Hypertension

NEW ORLEANS – In children, ambulatory systolic daytime blood pressure load – the amount of time spent above the 95^th blood pressure percentile for age and height – predicts cardiovascular target-organ damage, specifically diastolic dysfunction and arterial stiffness, according to an investigation from the American Heart Association Strategically Focused Research Network.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

Blood pressure load is considered in the 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics BP guideline, but the new findings add granularity on how to use it in practice. It’s part of an effort “to supply data to guide future guidelines, rather than arbitrarily picking a number – the 95th percentile – out of the sky,” said lead investigator and pediatric cardiologist Elaine Urbina, MD, director of preventative cardiology at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, and senior author on the 2017 guideline.

In the absence of data linking specific BP levels to hard cardiovascular outcomes, as in adults, “we feel that load is helpful in determining risk categories for kids as we make decisions about who should get lifestyle counseling and who should get medication. It gets a little bit at blood pressure variability” and supplements the arbitrary 95th-percentile threshold, she said.

“If I saw a child with only a mild elevation of mean ambulatory blood pressure but they had increased load, it would prompt me to order an echocardiogram to look for target organ damage, which may then change my therapy from lifestyle to medication,” Dr. Urbina said at the joint scientific sessions of the American Heart Association Council on Hypertension, AHA Council on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and American Society of Hypertension.

These conclusions come from an investigation of 339 healthy adolescents with a mean age of 15.6 years at six sites across the United States. Office BP was averaged over six readings during two visits, and ambulatory pressure was taken every 20 minutes over 26 hours. BP load was correlated with measures of left ventricular mass index (LVMI), systolic and diastolic function (E/e’ ratio), and pulse wave velocity (PWV), a gauge of arterial stiffness.

Overall, 215 subjects spent less than 25% of their time above the 95th percentile and were classified as the low-load group, 62 were above that mark 25%-49% of the time (mid-load group), and 62 were over it at least half of the time (high-load group).

Both load category and load as a continuous variable were significant predictors of arterial stiffness and diastolic dysfunction even after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and mean daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure (P less than 0.0001).

Subjects in the high-load group, for instance, had a PWV above 5.5 m/sec, versus about 5.2 m/sec and less than 5 m/sec in the mid- and low-load groups, respectively. The high-load group had an E/e’ ratio above 7, versus 6 or less in the other groups. There was a trend for higher LVMI and reduced strain as well in the low- versus high-load groups.

Although the findings don’t indicate clinically relevant cardiovascular damage, children with higher loads seem to be “on the road to getting it,” Dr. Urbina said. Greater arterial stiffness means that high pulsatile pressures are transmitted to the microvasculature. Meanwhile, “the strength of the relationship with diastolic dysfunction worries me. It’s a precursor of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, for which there are no effective therapies. We have to identify the precursors early and treat them so these kids don’t get heart failure later in life.”

Almost two-thirds of the subjects were white, most of the remainder were black, and 58% were boys. There were no statistically significant differences in age, race, sex, or body mass index across the groups, but overall, the children were overweight, and those with high BP load were more insulin resistant and had higher clinic and ambulatory BPs.

The team is assessing cognitive performance as a function of BP load.

Ambulatory pressures were taken by the Spacelabs OnTrak monitor.

The work was funded by the AHA and the National Institutes of Health. The investigators had no commercial disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Urbina E. Joint Hypertension 2019, Abstract P2056.

NEW ORLEANS – In children, ambulatory systolic daytime blood pressure load – the amount of time spent above the 95^th blood pressure percentile for age and height – predicts cardiovascular target-organ damage, specifically diastolic dysfunction and arterial stiffness, according to an investigation from the American Heart Association Strategically Focused Research Network.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

Blood pressure load is considered in the 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics BP guideline, but the new findings add granularity on how to use it in practice. It’s part of an effort “to supply data to guide future guidelines, rather than arbitrarily picking a number – the 95th percentile – out of the sky,” said lead investigator and pediatric cardiologist Elaine Urbina, MD, director of preventative cardiology at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, and senior author on the 2017 guideline.

In the absence of data linking specific BP levels to hard cardiovascular outcomes, as in adults, “we feel that load is helpful in determining risk categories for kids as we make decisions about who should get lifestyle counseling and who should get medication. It gets a little bit at blood pressure variability” and supplements the arbitrary 95th-percentile threshold, she said.

“If I saw a child with only a mild elevation of mean ambulatory blood pressure but they had increased load, it would prompt me to order an echocardiogram to look for target organ damage, which may then change my therapy from lifestyle to medication,” Dr. Urbina said at the joint scientific sessions of the American Heart Association Council on Hypertension, AHA Council on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and American Society of Hypertension.

These conclusions come from an investigation of 339 healthy adolescents with a mean age of 15.6 years at six sites across the United States. Office BP was averaged over six readings during two visits, and ambulatory pressure was taken every 20 minutes over 26 hours. BP load was correlated with measures of left ventricular mass index (LVMI), systolic and diastolic function (E/e’ ratio), and pulse wave velocity (PWV), a gauge of arterial stiffness.

Overall, 215 subjects spent less than 25% of their time above the 95th percentile and were classified as the low-load group, 62 were above that mark 25%-49% of the time (mid-load group), and 62 were over it at least half of the time (high-load group).

Both load category and load as a continuous variable were significant predictors of arterial stiffness and diastolic dysfunction even after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and mean daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure (P less than 0.0001).

Subjects in the high-load group, for instance, had a PWV above 5.5 m/sec, versus about 5.2 m/sec and less than 5 m/sec in the mid- and low-load groups, respectively. The high-load group had an E/e’ ratio above 7, versus 6 or less in the other groups. There was a trend for higher LVMI and reduced strain as well in the low- versus high-load groups.

Although the findings don’t indicate clinically relevant cardiovascular damage, children with higher loads seem to be “on the road to getting it,” Dr. Urbina said. Greater arterial stiffness means that high pulsatile pressures are transmitted to the microvasculature. Meanwhile, “the strength of the relationship with diastolic dysfunction worries me. It’s a precursor of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, for which there are no effective therapies. We have to identify the precursors early and treat them so these kids don’t get heart failure later in life.”

Almost two-thirds of the subjects were white, most of the remainder were black, and 58% were boys. There were no statistically significant differences in age, race, sex, or body mass index across the groups, but overall, the children were overweight, and those with high BP load were more insulin resistant and had higher clinic and ambulatory BPs.

The team is assessing cognitive performance as a function of BP load.

Ambulatory pressures were taken by the Spacelabs OnTrak monitor.

The work was funded by the AHA and the National Institutes of Health. The investigators had no commercial disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Urbina E. Joint Hypertension 2019, Abstract P2056.

NEW ORLEANS – In children, ambulatory systolic daytime blood pressure load – the amount of time spent above the 95^th blood pressure percentile for age and height – predicts cardiovascular target-organ damage, specifically diastolic dysfunction and arterial stiffness, according to an investigation from the American Heart Association Strategically Focused Research Network.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

Blood pressure load is considered in the 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics BP guideline, but the new findings add granularity on how to use it in practice. It’s part of an effort “to supply data to guide future guidelines, rather than arbitrarily picking a number – the 95th percentile – out of the sky,” said lead investigator and pediatric cardiologist Elaine Urbina, MD, director of preventative cardiology at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, and senior author on the 2017 guideline.

In the absence of data linking specific BP levels to hard cardiovascular outcomes, as in adults, “we feel that load is helpful in determining risk categories for kids as we make decisions about who should get lifestyle counseling and who should get medication. It gets a little bit at blood pressure variability” and supplements the arbitrary 95th-percentile threshold, she said.

“If I saw a child with only a mild elevation of mean ambulatory blood pressure but they had increased load, it would prompt me to order an echocardiogram to look for target organ damage, which may then change my therapy from lifestyle to medication,” Dr. Urbina said at the joint scientific sessions of the American Heart Association Council on Hypertension, AHA Council on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and American Society of Hypertension.

These conclusions come from an investigation of 339 healthy adolescents with a mean age of 15.6 years at six sites across the United States. Office BP was averaged over six readings during two visits, and ambulatory pressure was taken every 20 minutes over 26 hours. BP load was correlated with measures of left ventricular mass index (LVMI), systolic and diastolic function (E/e’ ratio), and pulse wave velocity (PWV), a gauge of arterial stiffness.

Overall, 215 subjects spent less than 25% of their time above the 95th percentile and were classified as the low-load group, 62 were above that mark 25%-49% of the time (mid-load group), and 62 were over it at least half of the time (high-load group).

Both load category and load as a continuous variable were significant predictors of arterial stiffness and diastolic dysfunction even after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and mean daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure (P less than 0.0001).

Subjects in the high-load group, for instance, had a PWV above 5.5 m/sec, versus about 5.2 m/sec and less than 5 m/sec in the mid- and low-load groups, respectively. The high-load group had an E/e’ ratio above 7, versus 6 or less in the other groups. There was a trend for higher LVMI and reduced strain as well in the low- versus high-load groups.

Although the findings don’t indicate clinically relevant cardiovascular damage, children with higher loads seem to be “on the road to getting it,” Dr. Urbina said. Greater arterial stiffness means that high pulsatile pressures are transmitted to the microvasculature. Meanwhile, “the strength of the relationship with diastolic dysfunction worries me. It’s a precursor of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, for which there are no effective therapies. We have to identify the precursors early and treat them so these kids don’t get heart failure later in life.”

Almost two-thirds of the subjects were white, most of the remainder were black, and 58% were boys. There were no statistically significant differences in age, race, sex, or body mass index across the groups, but overall, the children were overweight, and those with high BP load were more insulin resistant and had higher clinic and ambulatory BPs.

The team is assessing cognitive performance as a function of BP load.

Ambulatory pressures were taken by the Spacelabs OnTrak monitor.

The work was funded by the AHA and the National Institutes of Health. The investigators had no commercial disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Urbina E. Joint Hypertension 2019, Abstract P2056.

Men and women react differently to common drugs used to treat heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), according to findings from a new European study, and women may be able to safely cut their doses in half and get the same level of relief as that provided by larger doses.

“This study ... brings into question what the true optimal medical therapy is for women versus men,” the study authors, led by Bernadet T. Santema, MD, of the University Medical Center Groningen (the Netherlands), wrote in an article published in the Lancet.

Dr. Santema and colleagues noted that current guidelines for the use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) and beta-blockers for men and women with heart failure do not differentiate between the genders, despite findings showing that, “with the same dose, the maximum plasma concentrations of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and beta-blockers were up to 2.5 times higher in women than in men.”

In addition, the researchers wrote, women are much more likely than men to suffer side effects from medications, and the effects tend to be more severe.

HFrEF accounts for an estimated 50% of the 5.7 million patients with heart failure in the United States (Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Aug 24. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.58; Card Fail Rev. 2017;3[1]:7-11.)

For the new study, researchers launched an ad hoc analysis of the findings of a prospective study of HFrEF patients in 11 European countries (1,308 men and 402 women) who took drugs in the three classes. Patients were receiving suboptimal medication doses at the start of the study, and physicians were encouraged to increase their medication. The median follow-up for the primary endpoint was 21 months.

“In men, the lowest hazards of death or hospitalization for heart failure occurred at 100% of the recommended dose of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and beta-blockers, but women showed about 30% lower risk at only 50% of the recommended doses, with no further decrease in risk at higher dose levels,” the researchers wrote. “These sex differences were still present after adjusting for clinical covariates, including age and body surface area.”

The researchers analyzed an Asian registry (3,539 men, 961 women) as a comparison and found the identical numbers.

“Our study provides evidence supporting the hypothesis that women with HFrEF might have the best outcomes with lower doses of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and beta-blockers than do men, and lower doses than recommended in international guidelines for heart failure,” they wrote. However, they added that it was not likely that sex-specific studies analyzing doses would be performed.

In an accompanying editorial, Heather P. Whitley, PharmD, and Warren D. Smith, PharmD, noted that clinical research has often failed to take gender differences into account. They wrote that the study – the first of its kind – was well executed and raises important questions, but the analysis did not take into account the prevalence of adverse effects or the serum concentrations of the various medications. Although those limitations weaken the findings, the study still offers evidence that gender-based, drug-dose guidelines deserve consideration, wrote Dr. Whitley, of Auburn (Ala.) University, and Dr. Smith, of Baptist Health System, Montgomery, Ala (Lancet. 2019 Aug 22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736[19]31812-4).

The study was funded by the European Commission. Several study authors reported various disclosures. Dr. Whitley and Dr. Smith reported no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Santema BT et al. Lancet. 2019 Aug 22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31792-1.

Men and women react differently to common drugs used to treat heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), according to findings from a new European study, and women may be able to safely cut their doses in half and get the same level of relief as that provided by larger doses.

“This study ... brings into question what the true optimal medical therapy is for women versus men,” the study authors, led by Bernadet T. Santema, MD, of the University Medical Center Groningen (the Netherlands), wrote in an article published in the Lancet.

Dr. Santema and colleagues noted that current guidelines for the use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) and beta-blockers for men and women with heart failure do not differentiate between the genders, despite findings showing that, “with the same dose, the maximum plasma concentrations of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and beta-blockers were up to 2.5 times higher in women than in men.”

In addition, the researchers wrote, women are much more likely than men to suffer side effects from medications, and the effects tend to be more severe.

HFrEF accounts for an estimated 50% of the 5.7 million patients with heart failure in the United States (Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Aug 24. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.58; Card Fail Rev. 2017;3[1]:7-11.)

For the new study, researchers launched an ad hoc analysis of the findings of a prospective study of HFrEF patients in 11 European countries (1,308 men and 402 women) who took drugs in the three classes. Patients were receiving suboptimal medication doses at the start of the study, and physicians were encouraged to increase their medication. The median follow-up for the primary endpoint was 21 months.

“In men, the lowest hazards of death or hospitalization for heart failure occurred at 100% of the recommended dose of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and beta-blockers, but women showed about 30% lower risk at only 50% of the recommended doses, with no further decrease in risk at higher dose levels,” the researchers wrote. “These sex differences were still present after adjusting for clinical covariates, including age and body surface area.”

The researchers analyzed an Asian registry (3,539 men, 961 women) as a comparison and found the identical numbers.

“Our study provides evidence supporting the hypothesis that women with HFrEF might have the best outcomes with lower doses of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and beta-blockers than do men, and lower doses than recommended in international guidelines for heart failure,” they wrote. However, they added that it was not likely that sex-specific studies analyzing doses would be performed.

In an accompanying editorial, Heather P. Whitley, PharmD, and Warren D. Smith, PharmD, noted that clinical research has often failed to take gender differences into account. They wrote that the study – the first of its kind – was well executed and raises important questions, but the analysis did not take into account the prevalence of adverse effects or the serum concentrations of the various medications. Although those limitations weaken the findings, the study still offers evidence that gender-based, drug-dose guidelines deserve consideration, wrote Dr. Whitley, of Auburn (Ala.) University, and Dr. Smith, of Baptist Health System, Montgomery, Ala (Lancet. 2019 Aug 22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736[19]31812-4).

The study was funded by the European Commission. Several study authors reported various disclosures. Dr. Whitley and Dr. Smith reported no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Santema BT et al. Lancet. 2019 Aug 22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31792-1.

Men and women react differently to common drugs used to treat heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), according to findings from a new European study, and women may be able to safely cut their doses in half and get the same level of relief as that provided by larger doses.

“This study ... brings into question what the true optimal medical therapy is for women versus men,” the study authors, led by Bernadet T. Santema, MD, of the University Medical Center Groningen (the Netherlands), wrote in an article published in the Lancet.

Dr. Santema and colleagues noted that current guidelines for the use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) and beta-blockers for men and women with heart failure do not differentiate between the genders, despite findings showing that, “with the same dose, the maximum plasma concentrations of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and beta-blockers were up to 2.5 times higher in women than in men.”

In addition, the researchers wrote, women are much more likely than men to suffer side effects from medications, and the effects tend to be more severe.

HFrEF accounts for an estimated 50% of the 5.7 million patients with heart failure in the United States (Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Aug 24. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.58; Card Fail Rev. 2017;3[1]:7-11.)

For the new study, researchers launched an ad hoc analysis of the findings of a prospective study of HFrEF patients in 11 European countries (1,308 men and 402 women) who took drugs in the three classes. Patients were receiving suboptimal medication doses at the start of the study, and physicians were encouraged to increase their medication. The median follow-up for the primary endpoint was 21 months.

“In men, the lowest hazards of death or hospitalization for heart failure occurred at 100% of the recommended dose of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and beta-blockers, but women showed about 30% lower risk at only 50% of the recommended doses, with no further decrease in risk at higher dose levels,” the researchers wrote. “These sex differences were still present after adjusting for clinical covariates, including age and body surface area.”

The researchers analyzed an Asian registry (3,539 men, 961 women) as a comparison and found the identical numbers.

“Our study provides evidence supporting the hypothesis that women with HFrEF might have the best outcomes with lower doses of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and beta-blockers than do men, and lower doses than recommended in international guidelines for heart failure,” they wrote. However, they added that it was not likely that sex-specific studies analyzing doses would be performed.

In an accompanying editorial, Heather P. Whitley, PharmD, and Warren D. Smith, PharmD, noted that clinical research has often failed to take gender differences into account. They wrote that the study – the first of its kind – was well executed and raises important questions, but the analysis did not take into account the prevalence of adverse effects or the serum concentrations of the various medications. Although those limitations weaken the findings, the study still offers evidence that gender-based, drug-dose guidelines deserve consideration, wrote Dr. Whitley, of Auburn (Ala.) University, and Dr. Smith, of Baptist Health System, Montgomery, Ala (Lancet. 2019 Aug 22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736[19]31812-4).

The study was funded by the European Commission. Several study authors reported various disclosures. Dr. Whitley and Dr. Smith reported no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Santema BT et al. Lancet. 2019 Aug 22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31792-1.

The rate of chronic hypertension during pregnancy has increased significantly in the United States since 1970 and is more common in older women and in black women, according to a population-based, cross-sectional analysis.

Jovanmandic/Getty Images

Researchers analyzed data from more than 151 million women with delivery-related hospitalizations in the United States between 1970 and 2010 and found that the rate of chronic hypertension in pregnancy increased steadily over time from 1970 to 1990, plateaued from 1990 to 2000, then increased again to 2010.

The analysis revealed an average annual increase of 6% – which was higher among white women than among black women – and an overall 13-fold increase from 1970 to 2010. These increases appeared to be independent of rates of obesity and smoking. The findings were published in Hypertension.

The rates of chronic hypertension also increased with maternal age, among both black and white women.

“The strong association between age and rates of chronic hypertension underscores the potential for both biological and social determinants of health to influence risk,” wrote Cande V. Ananth, PhD, from the Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., and coauthors. “The period effect in chronic hypertension in pregnancy is thus largely a product of the age effect and the increasing mean age at first birth in the U.S.”

The overall prevalence of chronic hypertension in pregnancy was 0.63%, but was twofold higher in black women, compared with white women (1.24% vs. 0.53%). The authors noted that black women experienced disproportionally higher rates of ischemic placental disease, pregestational and gestational diabetes, preterm delivery and perinatal mortality, which may be a consequences of higher rates of obesity, social disadvantage, smoking, and less access to care.

“This disparity may also be related to the higher tendency of black women to develop vascular disease at an earlier age than white women, which may also explain why the age-associated increase in chronic hypertension among black women is relatively smaller than white women,” they wrote. “The persistent race disparity in chronic hypertension is also a cause for continued concern and underscores the role of complex population dynamics that shape risks.”

This was the largest study to evaluate changes in the prevalence of chronic hypertension in pregnancy over time and particularly how the prevalence is influenced by age, period, and birth cohort.

In regard to the 13-fold increase from 1970 to 2010, the researchers suggested that changing diagnostic criteria for hypertension, as well as earlier access to prenatal care, may have played a part. For example, the American College of Cardiology recently modified their guidelines to include patients with systolic and diastolic blood pressures of 130-139 mm Hg and 80-89 mm Hg as stage 1 hypertension, which they noted would increase the prevalence rates of chronic hypertension during pregnancy.

The researchers reported having no outside funding and no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Ananth CV et al. Hypertension. 2019 Sept 9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12968.

The rate of chronic hypertension during pregnancy has increased significantly in the United States since 1970 and is more common in older women and in black women, according to a population-based, cross-sectional analysis.

Jovanmandic/Getty Images

Researchers analyzed data from more than 151 million women with delivery-related hospitalizations in the United States between 1970 and 2010 and found that the rate of chronic hypertension in pregnancy increased steadily over time from 1970 to 1990, plateaued from 1990 to 2000, then increased again to 2010.

The analysis revealed an average annual increase of 6% – which was higher among white women than among black women – and an overall 13-fold increase from 1970 to 2010. These increases appeared to be independent of rates of obesity and smoking. The findings were published in Hypertension.

The rates of chronic hypertension also increased with maternal age, among both black and white women.

“The strong association between age and rates of chronic hypertension underscores the potential for both biological and social determinants of health to influence risk,” wrote Cande V. Ananth, PhD, from the Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., and coauthors. “The period effect in chronic hypertension in pregnancy is thus largely a product of the age effect and the increasing mean age at first birth in the U.S.”

The overall prevalence of chronic hypertension in pregnancy was 0.63%, but was twofold higher in black women, compared with white women (1.24% vs. 0.53%). The authors noted that black women experienced disproportionally higher rates of ischemic placental disease, pregestational and gestational diabetes, preterm delivery and perinatal mortality, which may be a consequences of higher rates of obesity, social disadvantage, smoking, and less access to care.

“This disparity may also be related to the higher tendency of black women to develop vascular disease at an earlier age than white women, which may also explain why the age-associated increase in chronic hypertension among black women is relatively smaller than white women,” they wrote. “The persistent race disparity in chronic hypertension is also a cause for continued concern and underscores the role of complex population dynamics that shape risks.”

This was the largest study to evaluate changes in the prevalence of chronic hypertension in pregnancy over time and particularly how the prevalence is influenced by age, period, and birth cohort.

In regard to the 13-fold increase from 1970 to 2010, the researchers suggested that changing diagnostic criteria for hypertension, as well as earlier access to prenatal care, may have played a part. For example, the American College of Cardiology recently modified their guidelines to include patients with systolic and diastolic blood pressures of 130-139 mm Hg and 80-89 mm Hg as stage 1 hypertension, which they noted would increase the prevalence rates of chronic hypertension during pregnancy.

The researchers reported having no outside funding and no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Ananth CV et al. Hypertension. 2019 Sept 9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12968.

The rate of chronic hypertension during pregnancy has increased significantly in the United States since 1970 and is more common in older women and in black women, according to a population-based, cross-sectional analysis.

Jovanmandic/Getty Images

Researchers analyzed data from more than 151 million women with delivery-related hospitalizations in the United States between 1970 and 2010 and found that the rate of chronic hypertension in pregnancy increased steadily over time from 1970 to 1990, plateaued from 1990 to 2000, then increased again to 2010.

The analysis revealed an average annual increase of 6% – which was higher among white women than among black women – and an overall 13-fold increase from 1970 to 2010. These increases appeared to be independent of rates of obesity and smoking. The findings were published in Hypertension.

The rates of chronic hypertension also increased with maternal age, among both black and white women.

“The strong association between age and rates of chronic hypertension underscores the potential for both biological and social determinants of health to influence risk,” wrote Cande V. Ananth, PhD, from the Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., and coauthors. “The period effect in chronic hypertension in pregnancy is thus largely a product of the age effect and the increasing mean age at first birth in the U.S.”

The overall prevalence of chronic hypertension in pregnancy was 0.63%, but was twofold higher in black women, compared with white women (1.24% vs. 0.53%). The authors noted that black women experienced disproportionally higher rates of ischemic placental disease, pregestational and gestational diabetes, preterm delivery and perinatal mortality, which may be a consequences of higher rates of obesity, social disadvantage, smoking, and less access to care.

“This disparity may also be related to the higher tendency of black women to develop vascular disease at an earlier age than white women, which may also explain why the age-associated increase in chronic hypertension among black women is relatively smaller than white women,” they wrote. “The persistent race disparity in chronic hypertension is also a cause for continued concern and underscores the role of complex population dynamics that shape risks.”

This was the largest study to evaluate changes in the prevalence of chronic hypertension in pregnancy over time and particularly how the prevalence is influenced by age, period, and birth cohort.

In regard to the 13-fold increase from 1970 to 2010, the researchers suggested that changing diagnostic criteria for hypertension, as well as earlier access to prenatal care, may have played a part. For example, the American College of Cardiology recently modified their guidelines to include patients with systolic and diastolic blood pressures of 130-139 mm Hg and 80-89 mm Hg as stage 1 hypertension, which they noted would increase the prevalence rates of chronic hypertension during pregnancy.

The researchers reported having no outside funding and no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Ananth CV et al. Hypertension. 2019 Sept 9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12968.

Pediatric cancer survivors have a higher likelihood of experiencing a cardiac event, developing diabetes, or having hypertension at a median 10-year follow-up, according to results from a recent research letter published in Circulation.

Ashna Khanna of the University of Toronto and colleagues identified 7,289 pediatric patients in the Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario Networked Information System who were diagnosed with cancer at median age of 7 years old, who were treated between 1987 and 2010, and who were cancer survivors for 5 years. Each patient was matched to five cancer-free control subjects who were a median of 24 years old at the 10-year follow-up (36,205 cancer-free individuals). The researchers studied whether pediatric cancer survivors experienced cardiac events, such as heart failure, arrhythmia, pericardial disease, valvular disease, or coronary artery disease. They also evaluated the incidence of diabetes and hypertension in each group.

Of the children who survived cancer, 2.8% (n = 203) experienced at least one cardiac event versus 0.9% of controls (P less than .001). The cancer survivors experienced 3.2 cardiac events per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 2.8-3.6), compared with the control group in which there was a rate of 0.9 cardiac events per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 0.9-1.9).

With regard to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, associated factors included cancer relapse or subsequent cancer (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7) and a 250-mg/m² or greater dose of doxorubicin-equivalent anthracycline chemotherapy, compared with a dose of less than 250 mg/m² or no anthracycline chemotherapy (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.9). Patients who developed diabetes mellitus before a CVD diagnosis were also at higher risk of CVD (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.6-5.8).

Heart failure risk was also statistically significant in patients with relapse and subsequent childhood cancer (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7), a 250-mg/m² or greater dose of doxorubicin-equivalent anthracycline chemotherapy (HR, 8.6; 95% CI, 4.5-16.6), diabetes (HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.8-10.7), and hypertension (HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3-7.9).

“While anthracycline chemotherapy may induce heart disease, many patients require this cancer treatment to survive,” Paul Nathan, MD, of the Hospital for Sick Children in Canada and a study coauthor said in a statement. “Doctors should address heart disease risk factors – such as diabetes and hypertension – that can be modified.”

This study was funded in part from a grant by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. Several authors reported support from noncommercial sources. The other authors reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Khanna A et al. Circulation. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041403.

Pediatric cancer survivors have a higher likelihood of experiencing a cardiac event, developing diabetes, or having hypertension at a median 10-year follow-up, according to results from a recent research letter published in Circulation.

Ashna Khanna of the University of Toronto and colleagues identified 7,289 pediatric patients in the Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario Networked Information System who were diagnosed with cancer at median age of 7 years old, who were treated between 1987 and 2010, and who were cancer survivors for 5 years. Each patient was matched to five cancer-free control subjects who were a median of 24 years old at the 10-year follow-up (36,205 cancer-free individuals). The researchers studied whether pediatric cancer survivors experienced cardiac events, such as heart failure, arrhythmia, pericardial disease, valvular disease, or coronary artery disease. They also evaluated the incidence of diabetes and hypertension in each group.

Of the children who survived cancer, 2.8% (n = 203) experienced at least one cardiac event versus 0.9% of controls (P less than .001). The cancer survivors experienced 3.2 cardiac events per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 2.8-3.6), compared with the control group in which there was a rate of 0.9 cardiac events per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 0.9-1.9).

With regard to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, associated factors included cancer relapse or subsequent cancer (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7) and a 250-mg/m² or greater dose of doxorubicin-equivalent anthracycline chemotherapy, compared with a dose of less than 250 mg/m² or no anthracycline chemotherapy (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.9). Patients who developed diabetes mellitus before a CVD diagnosis were also at higher risk of CVD (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.6-5.8).

Heart failure risk was also statistically significant in patients with relapse and subsequent childhood cancer (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7), a 250-mg/m² or greater dose of doxorubicin-equivalent anthracycline chemotherapy (HR, 8.6; 95% CI, 4.5-16.6), diabetes (HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.8-10.7), and hypertension (HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3-7.9).

“While anthracycline chemotherapy may induce heart disease, many patients require this cancer treatment to survive,” Paul Nathan, MD, of the Hospital for Sick Children in Canada and a study coauthor said in a statement. “Doctors should address heart disease risk factors – such as diabetes and hypertension – that can be modified.”

This study was funded in part from a grant by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. Several authors reported support from noncommercial sources. The other authors reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Khanna A et al. Circulation. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041403.

Pediatric cancer survivors have a higher likelihood of experiencing a cardiac event, developing diabetes, or having hypertension at a median 10-year follow-up, according to results from a recent research letter published in Circulation.

Ashna Khanna of the University of Toronto and colleagues identified 7,289 pediatric patients in the Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario Networked Information System who were diagnosed with cancer at median age of 7 years old, who were treated between 1987 and 2010, and who were cancer survivors for 5 years. Each patient was matched to five cancer-free control subjects who were a median of 24 years old at the 10-year follow-up (36,205 cancer-free individuals). The researchers studied whether pediatric cancer survivors experienced cardiac events, such as heart failure, arrhythmia, pericardial disease, valvular disease, or coronary artery disease. They also evaluated the incidence of diabetes and hypertension in each group.

Of the children who survived cancer, 2.8% (n = 203) experienced at least one cardiac event versus 0.9% of controls (P less than .001). The cancer survivors experienced 3.2 cardiac events per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 2.8-3.6), compared with the control group in which there was a rate of 0.9 cardiac events per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 0.9-1.9).

With regard to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, associated factors included cancer relapse or subsequent cancer (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7) and a 250-mg/m² or greater dose of doxorubicin-equivalent anthracycline chemotherapy, compared with a dose of less than 250 mg/m² or no anthracycline chemotherapy (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.9). Patients who developed diabetes mellitus before a CVD diagnosis were also at higher risk of CVD (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.6-5.8).

Heart failure risk was also statistically significant in patients with relapse and subsequent childhood cancer (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7), a 250-mg/m² or greater dose of doxorubicin-equivalent anthracycline chemotherapy (HR, 8.6; 95% CI, 4.5-16.6), diabetes (HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.8-10.7), and hypertension (HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3-7.9).

“While anthracycline chemotherapy may induce heart disease, many patients require this cancer treatment to survive,” Paul Nathan, MD, of the Hospital for Sick Children in Canada and a study coauthor said in a statement. “Doctors should address heart disease risk factors – such as diabetes and hypertension – that can be modified.”

This study was funded in part from a grant by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. Several authors reported support from noncommercial sources. The other authors reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Khanna A et al. Circulation. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041403.

NEW ORLEANS – An arm cuff that’s one size too small in children will artificially elevate blood pressure 5 mm Hg, while one size too large will drop it 5 mm Hg, according to investigators from Columbia University in New York.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

There are five cuff sizes in pediatrics, depending on a child’s arm circumference. Ideally, it’s measured beforehand so the right cuff size is used, but that doesn’t always happen in everyday practice.

Sometimes, clinicians just estimate arm size before choosing a cuff or opt for the medium-sized cuff in most kids; other times, the correct size has gone missing, said lead investigator Ruchi Gupta Mahajan, MD, a pediatric nephrology fellow at Columbia.

For those situations, she and her colleagues wanted to quantify how much the wrong cuff size throws off blood pressure readings in children, something that’s been done before in adult medicine, but not in pediatrics.

The idea was to give clinicians a decent estimate of true blood pressure even when the cuff isn’t quite right, something that’s particularly important with an increasing emphasis on catching hypertension as early as possible in children, she said.

After her subjects sat quietly for 10 minutes, Dr. Mahajan took automated blood pressure readings on 137 children; once with the right cuff size, once with a cuff one size too small, and once with a cuff one size too big, with a minute apart between readings.

The children were aged 4-12 years old and were in the office for wellness visits. None of them had heart or kidney disease, and none were on steroids or any other medications that affect blood pressure. There were a few more boys than girls, and almost all the children were Hispanic.

Overall, systolic blood pressure was an average of 5 mm Hg less with the larger cuff and 5 mm Hg more with the smaller cuff. The finding was the same in both girls and boys, and it held across age groups and in under, over, and normal weight children.

“I was really surprised there was no difference between ages, 4-12 years of age, its just a single number: 5. [Even] if [you] don’t have the appropriate cuff size,” the finding means that it’s still possible to have a good estimate of blood pressure, Dr. Mahajan said at the joint scientific sessions of the American Heart Association (AHA) Council on Hypertension, AHA Council on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and American Society of Hypertension.

Meanwhile, cuff size didn’t have any statistically significant effect on diastolic pressure.

There was no outside funding for the study and Dr. Mahajan reported having no disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Mahajan RG et al. Joint Hypertension 2019, Abstract P182.

NEW ORLEANS – An arm cuff that’s one size too small in children will artificially elevate blood pressure 5 mm Hg, while one size too large will drop it 5 mm Hg, according to investigators from Columbia University in New York.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

There are five cuff sizes in pediatrics, depending on a child’s arm circumference. Ideally, it’s measured beforehand so the right cuff size is used, but that doesn’t always happen in everyday practice.

Sometimes, clinicians just estimate arm size before choosing a cuff or opt for the medium-sized cuff in most kids; other times, the correct size has gone missing, said lead investigator Ruchi Gupta Mahajan, MD, a pediatric nephrology fellow at Columbia.

For those situations, she and her colleagues wanted to quantify how much the wrong cuff size throws off blood pressure readings in children, something that’s been done before in adult medicine, but not in pediatrics.

The idea was to give clinicians a decent estimate of true blood pressure even when the cuff isn’t quite right, something that’s particularly important with an increasing emphasis on catching hypertension as early as possible in children, she said.

After her subjects sat quietly for 10 minutes, Dr. Mahajan took automated blood pressure readings on 137 children; once with the right cuff size, once with a cuff one size too small, and once with a cuff one size too big, with a minute apart between readings.

The children were aged 4-12 years old and were in the office for wellness visits. None of them had heart or kidney disease, and none were on steroids or any other medications that affect blood pressure. There were a few more boys than girls, and almost all the children were Hispanic.

Overall, systolic blood pressure was an average of 5 mm Hg less with the larger cuff and 5 mm Hg more with the smaller cuff. The finding was the same in both girls and boys, and it held across age groups and in under, over, and normal weight children.

“I was really surprised there was no difference between ages, 4-12 years of age, its just a single number: 5. [Even] if [you] don’t have the appropriate cuff size,” the finding means that it’s still possible to have a good estimate of blood pressure, Dr. Mahajan said at the joint scientific sessions of the American Heart Association (AHA) Council on Hypertension, AHA Council on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and American Society of Hypertension.

Meanwhile, cuff size didn’t have any statistically significant effect on diastolic pressure.

There was no outside funding for the study and Dr. Mahajan reported having no disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Mahajan RG et al. Joint Hypertension 2019, Abstract P182.

NEW ORLEANS – An arm cuff that’s one size too small in children will artificially elevate blood pressure 5 mm Hg, while one size too large will drop it 5 mm Hg, according to investigators from Columbia University in New York.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

There are five cuff sizes in pediatrics, depending on a child’s arm circumference. Ideally, it’s measured beforehand so the right cuff size is used, but that doesn’t always happen in everyday practice.

Sometimes, clinicians just estimate arm size before choosing a cuff or opt for the medium-sized cuff in most kids; other times, the correct size has gone missing, said lead investigator Ruchi Gupta Mahajan, MD, a pediatric nephrology fellow at Columbia.

For those situations, she and her colleagues wanted to quantify how much the wrong cuff size throws off blood pressure readings in children, something that’s been done before in adult medicine, but not in pediatrics.

The idea was to give clinicians a decent estimate of true blood pressure even when the cuff isn’t quite right, something that’s particularly important with an increasing emphasis on catching hypertension as early as possible in children, she said.

After her subjects sat quietly for 10 minutes, Dr. Mahajan took automated blood pressure readings on 137 children; once with the right cuff size, once with a cuff one size too small, and once with a cuff one size too big, with a minute apart between readings.

The children were aged 4-12 years old and were in the office for wellness visits. None of them had heart or kidney disease, and none were on steroids or any other medications that affect blood pressure. There were a few more boys than girls, and almost all the children were Hispanic.

Overall, systolic blood pressure was an average of 5 mm Hg less with the larger cuff and 5 mm Hg more with the smaller cuff. The finding was the same in both girls and boys, and it held across age groups and in under, over, and normal weight children.

“I was really surprised there was no difference between ages, 4-12 years of age, its just a single number: 5. [Even] if [you] don’t have the appropriate cuff size,” the finding means that it’s still possible to have a good estimate of blood pressure, Dr. Mahajan said at the joint scientific sessions of the American Heart Association (AHA) Council on Hypertension, AHA Council on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and American Society of Hypertension.

Meanwhile, cuff size didn’t have any statistically significant effect on diastolic pressure.

There was no outside funding for the study and Dr. Mahajan reported having no disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Mahajan RG et al. Joint Hypertension 2019, Abstract P182.

NEW ORLEANS – Visceral adiposity, but not body mass index or total body fat, significantly correlated with elevated 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure, greater systolic variability, and masked hypertension in a study from the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Subjects in the highest quartile of visceral fat had a 6.3-fold greater odds of masked hypertension – normal in the office, but high at home – compared with those in the lowest quartile (95% confidence interval, 1.2-33.1).

The study findings suggest that central obesity, in particular, should trigger 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). “Every obese person should get a 24-hour” ABPM, but “we really need to be pushing [it] in people who have central adiposity. These are the patients ... we really need to focus on” because of the risk of masked hypertension, a “ticking time bomb” that greatly increases the risk of cardiovascular events, said lead investigator Jordana B. Cohen, MD, an assistant professor of medicine at the university.

The study also helps explain why body mass index (BMI) hasn’t been consistently linked to masked hypertension in previous studies; some studies likely included subjects with high BMIs but not central obesity.

Waist circumference, a marker of visceral adiposity, also correlated with elevated 24-hour systolic pressure and greater variability, but a trend for masked hypertension was not statistically significant, Dr. Cohen reported at the joint scientific sessions of the American Heart Association (AHA) Council on Hypertension, AHA Council on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and American Society of Hypertension.

It’s long been known that visceral fat – fat around the abdominal organs – is metabolically active and associated with greater cardiovascular risk, but its relationship to blood pressure hadn’t been well described, so Dr. Cohen and her team decided to take a look.

They ran whole body dual x-ray absorptiometry scans on 96 hypertensive adults on a stable dose of one antihypertensive drug for at least 2 months and correlated the findings with ABPM. Subjects were an average of 58 years old, almost 60% were women, almost half were black, and 54% were obese, with BMIs of at least 30 kg/m².

After adjustment for age, sex, race, and antihypertensive class, the team found a significant, linear correlation between visceral fat and mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure. Patients with a visceral adiposity of about 0.1 kg/m², for instance, had a mean pressure of around 130 mm Hg, compared with patients with more than 0.6 kg/m², who had a mean of almost 150 mm Hg. Findings were similar for waist circumference over a range of 70-150 cm.

The correlations were weak (r = 0.3), but Dr. Cohen said they might improve with ongoing enrollment. Both measures also correlated with systolic variability.

Overall, the highest quartiles of waist circumference and visceral adiposity correlated with the highest mean systolic pressures and greatest variability, compared with the lowest quartiles. Visceral adiposity was the only measure significantly linked with masked hypertension. Trends in those directions for increasing BMI and total body fat mass were not statistically significant.

Mean BMI in the study was 31.7 kg/m², and mean waist circumference was 104 cm. Mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure was 135 mm Hg and mean 24-hour systolic variability was 13 mm Hg. Almost 30% of the subjects had masked hypertension. Drug classes included beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, ACE-inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers.

Dr. Cohen plans to investigate drug response versus visceral adiposity once the recruitment goal of 150 subjects is reached.

There was no external funding, and the investigators reported that they didn’t have any relevant disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Cohen JB et al. Joint Hypertension 2019, Abstract P2052.

NEW ORLEANS – Visceral adiposity, but not body mass index or total body fat, significantly correlated with elevated 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure, greater systolic variability, and masked hypertension in a study from the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Subjects in the highest quartile of visceral fat had a 6.3-fold greater odds of masked hypertension – normal in the office, but high at home – compared with those in the lowest quartile (95% confidence interval, 1.2-33.1).

The study findings suggest that central obesity, in particular, should trigger 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). “Every obese person should get a 24-hour” ABPM, but “we really need to be pushing [it] in people who have central adiposity. These are the patients ... we really need to focus on” because of the risk of masked hypertension, a “ticking time bomb” that greatly increases the risk of cardiovascular events, said lead investigator Jordana B. Cohen, MD, an assistant professor of medicine at the university.

The study also helps explain why body mass index (BMI) hasn’t been consistently linked to masked hypertension in previous studies; some studies likely included subjects with high BMIs but not central obesity.

Waist circumference, a marker of visceral adiposity, also correlated with elevated 24-hour systolic pressure and greater variability, but a trend for masked hypertension was not statistically significant, Dr. Cohen reported at the joint scientific sessions of the American Heart Association (AHA) Council on Hypertension, AHA Council on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and American Society of Hypertension.

It’s long been known that visceral fat – fat around the abdominal organs – is metabolically active and associated with greater cardiovascular risk, but its relationship to blood pressure hadn’t been well described, so Dr. Cohen and her team decided to take a look.

They ran whole body dual x-ray absorptiometry scans on 96 hypertensive adults on a stable dose of one antihypertensive drug for at least 2 months and correlated the findings with ABPM. Subjects were an average of 58 years old, almost 60% were women, almost half were black, and 54% were obese, with BMIs of at least 30 kg/m².

After adjustment for age, sex, race, and antihypertensive class, the team found a significant, linear correlation between visceral fat and mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure. Patients with a visceral adiposity of about 0.1 kg/m², for instance, had a mean pressure of around 130 mm Hg, compared with patients with more than 0.6 kg/m², who had a mean of almost 150 mm Hg. Findings were similar for waist circumference over a range of 70-150 cm.

The correlations were weak (r = 0.3), but Dr. Cohen said they might improve with ongoing enrollment. Both measures also correlated with systolic variability.

Overall, the highest quartiles of waist circumference and visceral adiposity correlated with the highest mean systolic pressures and greatest variability, compared with the lowest quartiles. Visceral adiposity was the only measure significantly linked with masked hypertension. Trends in those directions for increasing BMI and total body fat mass were not statistically significant.

Mean BMI in the study was 31.7 kg/m², and mean waist circumference was 104 cm. Mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure was 135 mm Hg and mean 24-hour systolic variability was 13 mm Hg. Almost 30% of the subjects had masked hypertension. Drug classes included beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, ACE-inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers.

Dr. Cohen plans to investigate drug response versus visceral adiposity once the recruitment goal of 150 subjects is reached.

There was no external funding, and the investigators reported that they didn’t have any relevant disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Cohen JB et al. Joint Hypertension 2019, Abstract P2052.

NEW ORLEANS – Visceral adiposity, but not body mass index or total body fat, significantly correlated with elevated 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure, greater systolic variability, and masked hypertension in a study from the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Subjects in the highest quartile of visceral fat had a 6.3-fold greater odds of masked hypertension – normal in the office, but high at home – compared with those in the lowest quartile (95% confidence interval, 1.2-33.1).

The study findings suggest that central obesity, in particular, should trigger 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). “Every obese person should get a 24-hour” ABPM, but “we really need to be pushing [it] in people who have central adiposity. These are the patients ... we really need to focus on” because of the risk of masked hypertension, a “ticking time bomb” that greatly increases the risk of cardiovascular events, said lead investigator Jordana B. Cohen, MD, an assistant professor of medicine at the university.

The study also helps explain why body mass index (BMI) hasn’t been consistently linked to masked hypertension in previous studies; some studies likely included subjects with high BMIs but not central obesity.

Waist circumference, a marker of visceral adiposity, also correlated with elevated 24-hour systolic pressure and greater variability, but a trend for masked hypertension was not statistically significant, Dr. Cohen reported at the joint scientific sessions of the American Heart Association (AHA) Council on Hypertension, AHA Council on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and American Society of Hypertension.

It’s long been known that visceral fat – fat around the abdominal organs – is metabolically active and associated with greater cardiovascular risk, but its relationship to blood pressure hadn’t been well described, so Dr. Cohen and her team decided to take a look.

They ran whole body dual x-ray absorptiometry scans on 96 hypertensive adults on a stable dose of one antihypertensive drug for at least 2 months and correlated the findings with ABPM. Subjects were an average of 58 years old, almost 60% were women, almost half were black, and 54% were obese, with BMIs of at least 30 kg/m².

After adjustment for age, sex, race, and antihypertensive class, the team found a significant, linear correlation between visceral fat and mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure. Patients with a visceral adiposity of about 0.1 kg/m², for instance, had a mean pressure of around 130 mm Hg, compared with patients with more than 0.6 kg/m², who had a mean of almost 150 mm Hg. Findings were similar for waist circumference over a range of 70-150 cm.

The correlations were weak (r = 0.3), but Dr. Cohen said they might improve with ongoing enrollment. Both measures also correlated with systolic variability.

Overall, the highest quartiles of waist circumference and visceral adiposity correlated with the highest mean systolic pressures and greatest variability, compared with the lowest quartiles. Visceral adiposity was the only measure significantly linked with masked hypertension. Trends in those directions for increasing BMI and total body fat mass were not statistically significant.

Mean BMI in the study was 31.7 kg/m², and mean waist circumference was 104 cm. Mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure was 135 mm Hg and mean 24-hour systolic variability was 13 mm Hg. Almost 30% of the subjects had masked hypertension. Drug classes included beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, ACE-inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers.

Dr. Cohen plans to investigate drug response versus visceral adiposity once the recruitment goal of 150 subjects is reached.

There was no external funding, and the investigators reported that they didn’t have any relevant disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Cohen JB et al. Joint Hypertension 2019, Abstract P2052.

PARIS – In rural Peru, a comprehensive community-wide strategy to replace conventional table salt with a formulation that was 25% potassium chloride halved incident hypertension, also dropping blood pressure in participants with baseline hypertension.

The multifaceted intervention targeted six villages at the far north of Peru, replacing table salt with the lower-sodium substitute, J. Jaime Miranda, MD, PhD, said at a prevention-focused, late-breaking research session at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology. The 75/25 mixture had a palatable proportion of potassium, and was easily produced by combining table salt with potassium chloride crystals.

Dr. Miranda, director of the CRONICAS Center of Excellence at the Cayetano Heredia Peruvian University, Lima, and colleagues enrolled virtually all adult residents of the six villages in the study; patients who reported heart disease or chronic kidney disease were excluded.

“We wanted to achieve and shape a pragmatic study – and a pragmatic study that incorporates day-to-day behavior. We eat every day, but we think very little of our salt habits,” said Dr. Miranda in a video interview.

In all, 2,376 of 2,605 potential participants enrolled in the study, which used a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized, controlled trial design. To track the primary outcome measures of systolic and diastolic BP, measurements were obtained every 5 months for a total of seven rounds of measurement, said Dr. Miranda.

Dr. Miranda said that the investigators borrowed principles from social marketing to ensure community-wide replacement of table salt with the low-sodium substitute. This meant that they branded and packaged the low-sodium salt and gave it to participants at no cost – but with a catch. To receive the low-sodium salt, participants had to turn in their table salt.

The effort was supported by promotional events and a trained “sales force” who brought messaging to families, restaurants, and key voices in the community. The attractively packaged replacement salt was distributed with a similarly branded shaker. “We wanted to guarantee the full replacement of salt in the entire village,” explained Dr. Miranda.

At the end of the study, individuals with hypertension saw a decrease in systolic BP of 1.92 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, –3.29 to –0.54).

New hypertension diagnoses, a secondary outcome measure, fell by 55% in participating villages; the hazard ratio for hypertension incidence was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.31-0.66) in a fully adjusted statistical model that accounted for clustering at the village level, as well as age, sex, education, wealth index, and body mass index, said Dr. Miranda.

Older village residents with hypertension saw greater BP reduction; for those aged at least 60 years, the mean reduction was 2.17 mm Hg (95% CI, –3.67 to –0.68).

The positive findings were met with broad applause during his presentation, a response that made his 15-hour trip from Lima to Paris worthwhile, said Dr. Miranda.

Adherence was assessed by obtaining 24-hour urine samples from a random sample of 100 participants before and after the study. “This was my biggest fear – that as soon as we left the door, people would go and throw it away,” said Dr. Miranda. Among these participants, excreted potassium rose, indicating adherence, but sodium stayed basically the same. Possible explanations included that individuals were adding table salt to their diets, or that other prepared foods or condiments contained high amounts of sodium.

The study shows the feasibility of a community-wide intervention that achieved the dual aims of population-wide reductions in BP and reduction in incident BP, and of achieving clinically meaningful benefits for the high-risk population, said Dr. Miranda. He remarked that the population was young overall, with a mean age of 43 years and a low mean baseline systolic BP of 113, making the modest population-wide reduction more notable.

“We wanted to shift the entire distribution of blood pressure in the village. And with that, we see gains not only in public health, but also effective improvements in blood pressure in those at high risk, particularly those who tend to have high blood pressure,” said Dr. Miranda.

Discussant Bruce Neal, MD, professor of medicine at the University of Sydney and senior director of the George Institute for Global Health in Newtown, Australia, congratulated Dr. Miranda and colleagues on accomplishing “a truly enormous project.” He began by noting that, though the reductions were modest, “the low starting blood pressures were almost certainly responsible for the magnitude of effect seen in this study.” He added that “this is nonetheless a worthwhile blood pressure reduction, particularly if it was sustained throughout life.”

Addressing the lack of decrease in excreted urine sodium, Dr. Neal noted that participants may have supplemented their diet with additional sodium by one means or another, “which might also have attenuated the blood pressure difference – but it could also reflect the challenges of measuring sodium and potassium effectively with 24-hour urine samples, which are difficult to collect.”

The lack of adverse effects was notable, said Dr. Neal. “When considering the use of salt substitute at the population level, the first question that arises is: ‘What about the risks of hyperkalemia?’

“I think those risks are probably greatly overstated,” he said, noting that only individuals with severe chronic kidney disease would likely be affected, and those individuals are already well versed on the importance of avoiding excess dietary potassium.

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health through the Global Alliance for Chronic Disease program. Dr. Miranda reported that he had no conflicts of interest. Dr. Neal reported that he has financial relationships with Nu-Tec Salt and a Beijing-based salt manufacturer, related to research into salt substitutes.

PARIS – In rural Peru, a comprehensive community-wide strategy to replace conventional table salt with a formulation that was 25% potassium chloride halved incident hypertension, also dropping blood pressure in participants with baseline hypertension.

The multifaceted intervention targeted six villages at the far north of Peru, replacing table salt with the lower-sodium substitute, J. Jaime Miranda, MD, PhD, said at a prevention-focused, late-breaking research session at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology. The 75/25 mixture had a palatable proportion of potassium, and was easily produced by combining table salt with potassium chloride crystals.

Dr. Miranda, director of the CRONICAS Center of Excellence at the Cayetano Heredia Peruvian University, Lima, and colleagues enrolled virtually all adult residents of the six villages in the study; patients who reported heart disease or chronic kidney disease were excluded.

“We wanted to achieve and shape a pragmatic study – and a pragmatic study that incorporates day-to-day behavior. We eat every day, but we think very little of our salt habits,” said Dr. Miranda in a video interview.

In all, 2,376 of 2,605 potential participants enrolled in the study, which used a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized, controlled trial design. To track the primary outcome measures of systolic and diastolic BP, measurements were obtained every 5 months for a total of seven rounds of measurement, said Dr. Miranda.

Dr. Miranda said that the investigators borrowed principles from social marketing to ensure community-wide replacement of table salt with the low-sodium substitute. This meant that they branded and packaged the low-sodium salt and gave it to participants at no cost – but with a catch. To receive the low-sodium salt, participants had to turn in their table salt.

The effort was supported by promotional events and a trained “sales force” who brought messaging to families, restaurants, and key voices in the community. The attractively packaged replacement salt was distributed with a similarly branded shaker. “We wanted to guarantee the full replacement of salt in the entire village,” explained Dr. Miranda.

At the end of the study, individuals with hypertension saw a decrease in systolic BP of 1.92 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, –3.29 to –0.54).

New hypertension diagnoses, a secondary outcome measure, fell by 55% in participating villages; the hazard ratio for hypertension incidence was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.31-0.66) in a fully adjusted statistical model that accounted for clustering at the village level, as well as age, sex, education, wealth index, and body mass index, said Dr. Miranda.

Older village residents with hypertension saw greater BP reduction; for those aged at least 60 years, the mean reduction was 2.17 mm Hg (95% CI, –3.67 to –0.68).

The positive findings were met with broad applause during his presentation, a response that made his 15-hour trip from Lima to Paris worthwhile, said Dr. Miranda.

Adherence was assessed by obtaining 24-hour urine samples from a random sample of 100 participants before and after the study. “This was my biggest fear – that as soon as we left the door, people would go and throw it away,” said Dr. Miranda. Among these participants, excreted potassium rose, indicating adherence, but sodium stayed basically the same. Possible explanations included that individuals were adding table salt to their diets, or that other prepared foods or condiments contained high amounts of sodium.

The study shows the feasibility of a community-wide intervention that achieved the dual aims of population-wide reductions in BP and reduction in incident BP, and of achieving clinically meaningful benefits for the high-risk population, said Dr. Miranda. He remarked that the population was young overall, with a mean age of 43 years and a low mean baseline systolic BP of 113, making the modest population-wide reduction more notable.

“We wanted to shift the entire distribution of blood pressure in the village. And with that, we see gains not only in public health, but also effective improvements in blood pressure in those at high risk, particularly those who tend to have high blood pressure,” said Dr. Miranda.

Discussant Bruce Neal, MD, professor of medicine at the University of Sydney and senior director of the George Institute for Global Health in Newtown, Australia, congratulated Dr. Miranda and colleagues on accomplishing “a truly enormous project.” He began by noting that, though the reductions were modest, “the low starting blood pressures were almost certainly responsible for the magnitude of effect seen in this study.” He added that “this is nonetheless a worthwhile blood pressure reduction, particularly if it was sustained throughout life.”

Addressing the lack of decrease in excreted urine sodium, Dr. Neal noted that participants may have supplemented their diet with additional sodium by one means or another, “which might also have attenuated the blood pressure difference – but it could also reflect the challenges of measuring sodium and potassium effectively with 24-hour urine samples, which are difficult to collect.”

The lack of adverse effects was notable, said Dr. Neal. “When considering the use of salt substitute at the population level, the first question that arises is: ‘What about the risks of hyperkalemia?’

“I think those risks are probably greatly overstated,” he said, noting that only individuals with severe chronic kidney disease would likely be affected, and those individuals are already well versed on the importance of avoiding excess dietary potassium.

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health through the Global Alliance for Chronic Disease program. Dr. Miranda reported that he had no conflicts of interest. Dr. Neal reported that he has financial relationships with Nu-Tec Salt and a Beijing-based salt manufacturer, related to research into salt substitutes.

PARIS – In rural Peru, a comprehensive community-wide strategy to replace conventional table salt with a formulation that was 25% potassium chloride halved incident hypertension, also dropping blood pressure in participants with baseline hypertension.

The multifaceted intervention targeted six villages at the far north of Peru, replacing table salt with the lower-sodium substitute, J. Jaime Miranda, MD, PhD, said at a prevention-focused, late-breaking research session at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology. The 75/25 mixture had a palatable proportion of potassium, and was easily produced by combining table salt with potassium chloride crystals.

Dr. Miranda, director of the CRONICAS Center of Excellence at the Cayetano Heredia Peruvian University, Lima, and colleagues enrolled virtually all adult residents of the six villages in the study; patients who reported heart disease or chronic kidney disease were excluded.

“We wanted to achieve and shape a pragmatic study – and a pragmatic study that incorporates day-to-day behavior. We eat every day, but we think very little of our salt habits,” said Dr. Miranda in a video interview.

In all, 2,376 of 2,605 potential participants enrolled in the study, which used a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized, controlled trial design. To track the primary outcome measures of systolic and diastolic BP, measurements were obtained every 5 months for a total of seven rounds of measurement, said Dr. Miranda.

Dr. Miranda said that the investigators borrowed principles from social marketing to ensure community-wide replacement of table salt with the low-sodium substitute. This meant that they branded and packaged the low-sodium salt and gave it to participants at no cost – but with a catch. To receive the low-sodium salt, participants had to turn in their table salt.

The effort was supported by promotional events and a trained “sales force” who brought messaging to families, restaurants, and key voices in the community. The attractively packaged replacement salt was distributed with a similarly branded shaker. “We wanted to guarantee the full replacement of salt in the entire village,” explained Dr. Miranda.

At the end of the study, individuals with hypertension saw a decrease in systolic BP of 1.92 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, –3.29 to –0.54).

New hypertension diagnoses, a secondary outcome measure, fell by 55% in participating villages; the hazard ratio for hypertension incidence was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.31-0.66) in a fully adjusted statistical model that accounted for clustering at the village level, as well as age, sex, education, wealth index, and body mass index, said Dr. Miranda.

Older village residents with hypertension saw greater BP reduction; for those aged at least 60 years, the mean reduction was 2.17 mm Hg (95% CI, –3.67 to –0.68).

The positive findings were met with broad applause during his presentation, a response that made his 15-hour trip from Lima to Paris worthwhile, said Dr. Miranda.

Adherence was assessed by obtaining 24-hour urine samples from a random sample of 100 participants before and after the study. “This was my biggest fear – that as soon as we left the door, people would go and throw it away,” said Dr. Miranda. Among these participants, excreted potassium rose, indicating adherence, but sodium stayed basically the same. Possible explanations included that individuals were adding table salt to their diets, or that other prepared foods or condiments contained high amounts of sodium.

The study shows the feasibility of a community-wide intervention that achieved the dual aims of population-wide reductions in BP and reduction in incident BP, and of achieving clinically meaningful benefits for the high-risk population, said Dr. Miranda. He remarked that the population was young overall, with a mean age of 43 years and a low mean baseline systolic BP of 113, making the modest population-wide reduction more notable.

“We wanted to shift the entire distribution of blood pressure in the village. And with that, we see gains not only in public health, but also effective improvements in blood pressure in those at high risk, particularly those who tend to have high blood pressure,” said Dr. Miranda.

Discussant Bruce Neal, MD, professor of medicine at the University of Sydney and senior director of the George Institute for Global Health in Newtown, Australia, congratulated Dr. Miranda and colleagues on accomplishing “a truly enormous project.” He began by noting that, though the reductions were modest, “the low starting blood pressures were almost certainly responsible for the magnitude of effect seen in this study.” He added that “this is nonetheless a worthwhile blood pressure reduction, particularly if it was sustained throughout life.”

Addressing the lack of decrease in excreted urine sodium, Dr. Neal noted that participants may have supplemented their diet with additional sodium by one means or another, “which might also have attenuated the blood pressure difference – but it could also reflect the challenges of measuring sodium and potassium effectively with 24-hour urine samples, which are difficult to collect.”

The lack of adverse effects was notable, said Dr. Neal. “When considering the use of salt substitute at the population level, the first question that arises is: ‘What about the risks of hyperkalemia?’

“I think those risks are probably greatly overstated,” he said, noting that only individuals with severe chronic kidney disease would likely be affected, and those individuals are already well versed on the importance of avoiding excess dietary potassium.

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health through the Global Alliance for Chronic Disease program. Dr. Miranda reported that he had no conflicts of interest. Dr. Neal reported that he has financial relationships with Nu-Tec Salt and a Beijing-based salt manufacturer, related to research into salt substitutes.

A community-based care model to control hypertension led by nonphysician health care workers significantly reduced cardiovascular disease risk over 12 months, data from a cluster-controlled randomized study has shown.

Hypertension remains the most common risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but fewer than 20% of individuals with hypertension have their blood pressure controlled, wrote Jon-David Schwalm, MD, of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont., and colleagues. To help control hypertension in underserved populations, the researchers tested a care model involving nonphysician health workers (NPHWs), primary care physicians, and family members.

The HOPE4 study, presented at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology and published simultaneously in the Lancet, included 1,371 adults aged 50 years and older with new or poorly controlled hypertension from 30 communities in Colombia and Malaysia. Sixteen communities were randomized to usual care and 14 to an intervention. The intervention included community screening and treatment of cardiovascular disease risk factors by NPHWs, free medications recommended by NPHWs under physician supervision, and family support for treatment adherence.

After 12 months, the Framingham Risk Scores for 10-year cardiovascular disease risk were significantly lower in the intervention group, compared with the control group (–11.17% vs. –6.40%). In addition, the intervention group showed a significant 11.45 mm Hg greater reduction in systolic blood pressure and a significant 0.41 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol, compared with controls (P less than .0001 for both measures).

Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Approximately 74% of the participants had a history of poorly controlled hypertension, while the remaining patients had new hypertension diagnoses.

“NPHWs were found to be consistently accurate in their ability to identify cardiovascular risk (patient identified by NPHWs as having poorly controlled blood pressure and medication was indicated) and recommend appropriate therapies (antihypertensives and statin as per the study algorithm) when compared with the assessment by local primary care physicians,” the researchers wrote. The study shows how effectively NPHWs can help reduce cardiovascular disease risk at the community level with proper training, effective community outreach, and task sharing with physicians and family members, they noted.

The findings were limited by the inability to assess the safety of specific medications, but no differences in adverse events were reported between the intervention and control groups. Other limitations included the screening of controls for cardiovascular disease risk at baseline, which meant that controls may have modified their behavior as a result, the researchers noted. In addition, the study was not blinded and surrogate outcomes were used because of the short study duration and relatively small sample size, they said.

However, the results support the use of a comprehensive, NPHW-led model, and “the HOPE 4 strategy could help to attain the UN General Assembly Action Plan for a one-third reduction in premature mortality from cardiovascular disease” by 2030, the researchers concluded.

The study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Grand Challenges Canada; Ontario SPOR Support Unit and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Boehringer Ingelheim; Department of Management of Non-Communicable Diseases, World Health Organization; and the Population Health Research Institute. Lead author Dr. Schwalm and several coauthors disclosed grants to their institutions for this study from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Boehringer Ingelheim, and the Department of Management of Non-Communicable Diseases, WHO.

SOURCE: Schwalm J-D et al. Lancet. 2019 Sept 2. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(19)31949-X.

A community-based care model to control hypertension led by nonphysician health care workers significantly reduced cardiovascular disease risk over 12 months, data from a cluster-controlled randomized study has shown.

Hypertension remains the most common risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but fewer than 20% of individuals with hypertension have their blood pressure controlled, wrote Jon-David Schwalm, MD, of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont., and colleagues. To help control hypertension in underserved populations, the researchers tested a care model involving nonphysician health workers (NPHWs), primary care physicians, and family members.

The HOPE4 study, presented at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology and published simultaneously in the Lancet, included 1,371 adults aged 50 years and older with new or poorly controlled hypertension from 30 communities in Colombia and Malaysia. Sixteen communities were randomized to usual care and 14 to an intervention. The intervention included community screening and treatment of cardiovascular disease risk factors by NPHWs, free medications recommended by NPHWs under physician supervision, and family support for treatment adherence.

After 12 months, the Framingham Risk Scores for 10-year cardiovascular disease risk were significantly lower in the intervention group, compared with the control group (–11.17% vs. –6.40%). In addition, the intervention group showed a significant 11.45 mm Hg greater reduction in systolic blood pressure and a significant 0.41 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol, compared with controls (P less than .0001 for both measures).

Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Approximately 74% of the participants had a history of poorly controlled hypertension, while the remaining patients had new hypertension diagnoses.

“NPHWs were found to be consistently accurate in their ability to identify cardiovascular risk (patient identified by NPHWs as having poorly controlled blood pressure and medication was indicated) and recommend appropriate therapies (antihypertensives and statin as per the study algorithm) when compared with the assessment by local primary care physicians,” the researchers wrote. The study shows how effectively NPHWs can help reduce cardiovascular disease risk at the community level with proper training, effective community outreach, and task sharing with physicians and family members, they noted.

The findings were limited by the inability to assess the safety of specific medications, but no differences in adverse events were reported between the intervention and control groups. Other limitations included the screening of controls for cardiovascular disease risk at baseline, which meant that controls may have modified their behavior as a result, the researchers noted. In addition, the study was not blinded and surrogate outcomes were used because of the short study duration and relatively small sample size, they said.

However, the results support the use of a comprehensive, NPHW-led model, and “the HOPE 4 strategy could help to attain the UN General Assembly Action Plan for a one-third reduction in premature mortality from cardiovascular disease” by 2030, the researchers concluded.

The study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Grand Challenges Canada; Ontario SPOR Support Unit and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Boehringer Ingelheim; Department of Management of Non-Communicable Diseases, World Health Organization; and the Population Health Research Institute. Lead author Dr. Schwalm and several coauthors disclosed grants to their institutions for this study from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Boehringer Ingelheim, and the Department of Management of Non-Communicable Diseases, WHO.

SOURCE: Schwalm J-D et al. Lancet. 2019 Sept 2. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(19)31949-X.

A community-based care model to control hypertension led by nonphysician health care workers significantly reduced cardiovascular disease risk over 12 months, data from a cluster-controlled randomized study has shown.

Hypertension remains the most common risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but fewer than 20% of individuals with hypertension have their blood pressure controlled, wrote Jon-David Schwalm, MD, of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont., and colleagues. To help control hypertension in underserved populations, the researchers tested a care model involving nonphysician health workers (NPHWs), primary care physicians, and family members.

The HOPE4 study, presented at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology and published simultaneously in the Lancet, included 1,371 adults aged 50 years and older with new or poorly controlled hypertension from 30 communities in Colombia and Malaysia. Sixteen communities were randomized to usual care and 14 to an intervention. The intervention included community screening and treatment of cardiovascular disease risk factors by NPHWs, free medications recommended by NPHWs under physician supervision, and family support for treatment adherence.

After 12 months, the Framingham Risk Scores for 10-year cardiovascular disease risk were significantly lower in the intervention group, compared with the control group (–11.17% vs. –6.40%). In addition, the intervention group showed a significant 11.45 mm Hg greater reduction in systolic blood pressure and a significant 0.41 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol, compared with controls (P less than .0001 for both measures).

Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Approximately 74% of the participants had a history of poorly controlled hypertension, while the remaining patients had new hypertension diagnoses.

“NPHWs were found to be consistently accurate in their ability to identify cardiovascular risk (patient identified by NPHWs as having poorly controlled blood pressure and medication was indicated) and recommend appropriate therapies (antihypertensives and statin as per the study algorithm) when compared with the assessment by local primary care physicians,” the researchers wrote. The study shows how effectively NPHWs can help reduce cardiovascular disease risk at the community level with proper training, effective community outreach, and task sharing with physicians and family members, they noted.

The findings were limited by the inability to assess the safety of specific medications, but no differences in adverse events were reported between the intervention and control groups. Other limitations included the screening of controls for cardiovascular disease risk at baseline, which meant that controls may have modified their behavior as a result, the researchers noted. In addition, the study was not blinded and surrogate outcomes were used because of the short study duration and relatively small sample size, they said.

However, the results support the use of a comprehensive, NPHW-led model, and “the HOPE 4 strategy could help to attain the UN General Assembly Action Plan for a one-third reduction in premature mortality from cardiovascular disease” by 2030, the researchers concluded.

The study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Grand Challenges Canada; Ontario SPOR Support Unit and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Boehringer Ingelheim; Department of Management of Non-Communicable Diseases, World Health Organization; and the Population Health Research Institute. Lead author Dr. Schwalm and several coauthors disclosed grants to their institutions for this study from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Boehringer Ingelheim, and the Department of Management of Non-Communicable Diseases, WHO.

SOURCE: Schwalm J-D et al. Lancet. 2019 Sept 2. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(19)31949-X.

An 88-year-old man with hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and atrial fibrillation presents with severe cerebral palsy and is diagnosed with a non–ST-elevation MI. He is found to have 90% left anterior descending artery occlusion and receives a drug-eluting stent. His current medications include warfarin, tiotropium, amlodipine, aspirin, and lisinopril. What anticoagulant therapy should he receive?

A) Clopidogrel, warfarin, and aspirin

B) Clopidogrel and aspirin

C) Clopidogrel and warfarin

D) Warfarin

E) Warfarin and aspirin

This issue comes up frequently with our patients with atrial fibrillation who are on anticoagulation, then have a coronary event and have a stent placed. What is the best approach to anticoagulation? I think for this patient adding clopidogrel, continuing warfarin, and stopping aspirin would be the best of the options presented.

Elderly patients have a higher risk of bleeding. They also have a greater chance of accumulating cardiovascular disease (atrial fibrillation, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and valvular disease) that requires anticoagulation. Dewilde et al. studied the difference in bleeding risk in patients who were on oral anticoagulants who then underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention.¹ Patients were assigned clopidogrel alone or clopidogrel plus aspirin in addition to their oral anticoagulant (warfarin). There was a significant increase in all-cause mortality in the patients who received clopidogrel plus aspirin (P = .027), and no significant difference in cardiac mortality between the two groups. There was a much higher risk of bleeding (44.4%) in the patients receiving triple therapy, compared with the double-therapy group (19.4%; P less than .0001).

In a large meta-analysis of over 7,000 patients by D’Ascenzo et al., there was no difference in thrombotic risk between double and triple therapy, and lower bleeding risk in patients who received double therapy.²

In a recently published article, Lopes et al. looked at the benefits and risks of antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation.³ The study included 4,614 patients, all of whom received a P2Y12 inhibitor. In addition, they received either apixaban or warfarin, and either aspirin or placebo. The patients who received apixaban had a lower risk of bleeding than those receiving warfarin (P less than .001), and those receiving aspirin had a higher risk than those receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 1.89; P less than .001). Patients using the combination of apixaban plus placebo had the lowest event rate per 100 years (16.8), followed by warfarin plus placebo (26.7), then apixaban plus aspirin (33.6), with warfarin plus aspirin having the highest event rate (49.1). The conclusion for the study was that regimens with apixaban without aspirin had less bleeding and hospitalizations without increased ischemic events, compared with regimens of warfarin with or without aspirin.

I think it is best to avoid aspirin in patients who are anticoagulated with warfarin, and likely this extends to Xa inhibitors as well.

Pearl: Avoid using triple anticoagulant therapy by eliminating aspirin.

Dr. Paauw is professor of medicine in the division of general internal medicine at the University of Washington, Seattle, and serves as third-year medical student clerkship director at the University of Washington. Contact Dr. Paauw at [email protected].

References

1. Dewilde WJ et al. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2013 Mar 30;381(9872):1107-15.

2. D’Ascenzo F et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and adjusted observational results of use of clopidogrel, aspirin, and oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2015 May 1;115(9):1185-93.

3. Lopes RD et al. Antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome or PCI in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 18;380(16):1509-24.

An 88-year-old man with hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and atrial fibrillation presents with severe cerebral palsy and is diagnosed with a non–ST-elevation MI. He is found to have 90% left anterior descending artery occlusion and receives a drug-eluting stent. His current medications include warfarin, tiotropium, amlodipine, aspirin, and lisinopril. What anticoagulant therapy should he receive?

A) Clopidogrel, warfarin, and aspirin

B) Clopidogrel and aspirin

C) Clopidogrel and warfarin

D) Warfarin

E) Warfarin and aspirin

This issue comes up frequently with our patients with atrial fibrillation who are on anticoagulation, then have a coronary event and have a stent placed. What is the best approach to anticoagulation? I think for this patient adding clopidogrel, continuing warfarin, and stopping aspirin would be the best of the options presented.

Elderly patients have a higher risk of bleeding. They also have a greater chance of accumulating cardiovascular disease (atrial fibrillation, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and valvular disease) that requires anticoagulation. Dewilde et al. studied the difference in bleeding risk in patients who were on oral anticoagulants who then underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention.¹ Patients were assigned clopidogrel alone or clopidogrel plus aspirin in addition to their oral anticoagulant (warfarin). There was a significant increase in all-cause mortality in the patients who received clopidogrel plus aspirin (P = .027), and no significant difference in cardiac mortality between the two groups. There was a much higher risk of bleeding (44.4%) in the patients receiving triple therapy, compared with the double-therapy group (19.4%; P less than .0001).

In a large meta-analysis of over 7,000 patients by D’Ascenzo et al., there was no difference in thrombotic risk between double and triple therapy, and lower bleeding risk in patients who received double therapy.²

In a recently published article, Lopes et al. looked at the benefits and risks of antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation.³ The study included 4,614 patients, all of whom received a P2Y12 inhibitor. In addition, they received either apixaban or warfarin, and either aspirin or placebo. The patients who received apixaban had a lower risk of bleeding than those receiving warfarin (P less than .001), and those receiving aspirin had a higher risk than those receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 1.89; P less than .001). Patients using the combination of apixaban plus placebo had the lowest event rate per 100 years (16.8), followed by warfarin plus placebo (26.7), then apixaban plus aspirin (33.6), with warfarin plus aspirin having the highest event rate (49.1). The conclusion for the study was that regimens with apixaban without aspirin had less bleeding and hospitalizations without increased ischemic events, compared with regimens of warfarin with or without aspirin.

I think it is best to avoid aspirin in patients who are anticoagulated with warfarin, and likely this extends to Xa inhibitors as well.

Pearl: Avoid using triple anticoagulant therapy by eliminating aspirin.

Dr. Paauw is professor of medicine in the division of general internal medicine at the University of Washington, Seattle, and serves as third-year medical student clerkship director at the University of Washington. Contact Dr. Paauw at [email protected].

References

1. Dewilde WJ et al. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2013 Mar 30;381(9872):1107-15.

2. D’Ascenzo F et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and adjusted observational results of use of clopidogrel, aspirin, and oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2015 May 1;115(9):1185-93.

3. Lopes RD et al. Antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome or PCI in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 18;380(16):1509-24.

An 88-year-old man with hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and atrial fibrillation presents with severe cerebral palsy and is diagnosed with a non–ST-elevation MI. He is found to have 90% left anterior descending artery occlusion and receives a drug-eluting stent. His current medications include warfarin, tiotropium, amlodipine, aspirin, and lisinopril. What anticoagulant therapy should he receive?

A) Clopidogrel, warfarin, and aspirin

B) Clopidogrel and aspirin

C) Clopidogrel and warfarin

D) Warfarin

E) Warfarin and aspirin

This issue comes up frequently with our patients with atrial fibrillation who are on anticoagulation, then have a coronary event and have a stent placed. What is the best approach to anticoagulation? I think for this patient adding clopidogrel, continuing warfarin, and stopping aspirin would be the best of the options presented.

Elderly patients have a higher risk of bleeding. They also have a greater chance of accumulating cardiovascular disease (atrial fibrillation, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and valvular disease) that requires anticoagulation. Dewilde et al. studied the difference in bleeding risk in patients who were on oral anticoagulants who then underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention.¹ Patients were assigned clopidogrel alone or clopidogrel plus aspirin in addition to their oral anticoagulant (warfarin). There was a significant increase in all-cause mortality in the patients who received clopidogrel plus aspirin (P = .027), and no significant difference in cardiac mortality between the two groups. There was a much higher risk of bleeding (44.4%) in the patients receiving triple therapy, compared with the double-therapy group (19.4%; P less than .0001).

In a large meta-analysis of over 7,000 patients by D’Ascenzo et al., there was no difference in thrombotic risk between double and triple therapy, and lower bleeding risk in patients who received double therapy.²

In a recently published article, Lopes et al. looked at the benefits and risks of antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation.³ The study included 4,614 patients, all of whom received a P2Y12 inhibitor. In addition, they received either apixaban or warfarin, and either aspirin or placebo. The patients who received apixaban had a lower risk of bleeding than those receiving warfarin (P less than .001), and those receiving aspirin had a higher risk than those receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 1.89; P less than .001). Patients using the combination of apixaban plus placebo had the lowest event rate per 100 years (16.8), followed by warfarin plus placebo (26.7), then apixaban plus aspirin (33.6), with warfarin plus aspirin having the highest event rate (49.1). The conclusion for the study was that regimens with apixaban without aspirin had less bleeding and hospitalizations without increased ischemic events, compared with regimens of warfarin with or without aspirin.

I think it is best to avoid aspirin in patients who are anticoagulated with warfarin, and likely this extends to Xa inhibitors as well.

Pearl: Avoid using triple anticoagulant therapy by eliminating aspirin.

Dr. Paauw is professor of medicine in the division of general internal medicine at the University of Washington, Seattle, and serves as third-year medical student clerkship director at the University of Washington. Contact Dr. Paauw at [email protected].

References

1. Dewilde WJ et al. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2013 Mar 30;381(9872):1107-15.

2. D’Ascenzo F et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and adjusted observational results of use of clopidogrel, aspirin, and oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2015 May 1;115(9):1185-93.

3. Lopes RD et al. Antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome or PCI in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 18;380(16):1509-24.

Uncontrolled hypertension among individuals aged 45-65 years of age is associated with an increased risk of subsequent dementia, according to a relatively large prospective population-based cohort study that followed patients for almost 30 years.

Ingram Publishing/ThinkStock

Even though previously published studies have not conclusively linked blood pressure control with a reduction in dementia risk, a second study, published simultaneously, did link blood pressure control with a smaller increase in white matter lesions, which are a marker of dementia risk. However, a reduction in total brain volume that accompanied this protection raised concern.

In the first of the two reports published Aug. 13 in JAMA, individuals 45-65 years of age participating in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study were followed for cognitive function in relation to blood pressure. The baseline visit took place in 1987-1989. Cognitive function was also evaluated at the fifth visit, which took place in 2011-2013, and the sixth visit, which took place in 2016-2017.

At the sixth visit, the incidence of dementia among patients who were normotensive at baseline and also normotensive at the fifth visit was 1.31 per 100 person-years. For those with hypertension (greater than 140/90 mm Hg) at the fifth visit but normotensive at baseline, the incidence was 1.99 per 100 patient-years. For those with hypertension at both time points, the incidence was 4.26 per 100 patient-years.

When translated into hazard ratios, those with midlife and late-life hypertension were nearly 50% more likely to develop dementia (HR, 1.49) relative to those who remained normotensive. For those who had only midlife hypertension, the risk was also significantly increased (HR, 1.41) relative to those who remained normotensive at both time points.

Those with midlife hypertension but late-life hypotension were also found to be at greater risk of dementia (HR, 1.62) relative to those who remained normotensive.

These data support the premise that uncontrolled midlife hypertension increases risk of dementia but do not touch on whether blood pressure reductions reduce this risk. However, a second study published simultaneously provided at least some evidence that blood pressure control might offer some protection.

In this report, which is a substudy of the previously published Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) MIND trial, brain volume changes were evaluated via MRI in 449 of the more than 2,000 patients included in the previously published trial (Williamson JD et al. JAMA. 2019;321[6]:553-61).

After a median 3.4 years of follow-up, mean white matter lesion volume increased only 0.92 cm³ in patients receiving intensive systolic blood pressure control, defined as less than 120 mm Hg, versus 1.45 cm³ in those with higher systolic blood pressures.

These substudy data are encouraging, but it is important to recognize that the previously published and larger SPRINT MIND trial did not achieve its endpoint. In that study, the protection against dementia was nonsignificant (HR, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.04).

In addition, the lower loss in white matter volume with intensive blood pressure lowering in the MRI substudy was accompanied with a greater loss in total brain volume (–30.6 vs. –26.9 cm³), which is considered a potentially negative effect.

As a result, the picture for risk management remains unclear, according to an editorial that accompanied publication of both studies.

“The important clinical question is whether changes of a few cubic millimeters in white matter hyperintensity volume or brain make a difference on brain function,” observed the author of the editorial, Shyam Prabhakaran, MD, of the department of neurology at the University of Chicago.

He believes that there are several findings from both studies that are “encouraging” in regard to blood pressure control for the prevention of dementia, but he also listed many unanswered questions, including why benefits observed to date have been so modest. He speculated that meaningful clinical benefits might depend on a multimodal approach that includes modification of other vascular risk factors, such as elevated lipids.

He also suggested that many issues regarding intensive blood pressure control for preventing dementia are unresolved, suggesting the need for more studies.

Not least, “later blood-pressure lowering interventions require careful monitoring for the potential cognitive harm associated with late-life hypotension,” Dr. Prabhakaran noted. Calling the effects of blood pressure control on brain health “nuanced,” he concluded that there is an opportunity for blood pressure modifications to prevent dementia, but stressed that optimal blood pressure targets for the purposes of preventing dementia are unknown.

The ARIC and SPRINT studies are supported by the National Institutes of Health. Several authors reported relationships with industry but no conflicts of interest relevant to this study.

SOURCES: Walker KA et al. JAMA. 2019;322(6):535-45; SPRINT MIND investigators. JAMA. 2019;322(6):524-34; Prabhakaran S. JAMA. 2019;322(6):512-3

Uncontrolled hypertension among individuals aged 45-65 years of age is associated with an increased risk of subsequent dementia, according to a relatively large prospective population-based cohort study that followed patients for almost 30 years.

Ingram Publishing/ThinkStock

Even though previously published studies have not conclusively linked blood pressure control with a reduction in dementia risk, a second study, published simultaneously, did link blood pressure control with a smaller increase in white matter lesions, which are a marker of dementia risk. However, a reduction in total brain volume that accompanied this protection raised concern.

In the first of the two reports published Aug. 13 in JAMA, individuals 45-65 years of age participating in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study were followed for cognitive function in relation to blood pressure. The baseline visit took place in 1987-1989. Cognitive function was also evaluated at the fifth visit, which took place in 2011-2013, and the sixth visit, which took place in 2016-2017.

At the sixth visit, the incidence of dementia among patients who were normotensive at baseline and also normotensive at the fifth visit was 1.31 per 100 person-years. For those with hypertension (greater than 140/90 mm Hg) at the fifth visit but normotensive at baseline, the incidence was 1.99 per 100 patient-years. For those with hypertension at both time points, the incidence was 4.26 per 100 patient-years.

When translated into hazard ratios, those with midlife and late-life hypertension were nearly 50% more likely to develop dementia (HR, 1.49) relative to those who remained normotensive. For those who had only midlife hypertension, the risk was also significantly increased (HR, 1.41) relative to those who remained normotensive at both time points.

Those with midlife hypertension but late-life hypotension were also found to be at greater risk of dementia (HR, 1.62) relative to those who remained normotensive.

These data support the premise that uncontrolled midlife hypertension increases risk of dementia but do not touch on whether blood pressure reductions reduce this risk. However, a second study published simultaneously provided at least some evidence that blood pressure control might offer some protection.

In this report, which is a substudy of the previously published Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) MIND trial, brain volume changes were evaluated via MRI in 449 of the more than 2,000 patients included in the previously published trial (Williamson JD et al. JAMA. 2019;321[6]:553-61).

After a median 3.4 years of follow-up, mean white matter lesion volume increased only 0.92 cm³ in patients receiving intensive systolic blood pressure control, defined as less than 120 mm Hg, versus 1.45 cm³ in those with higher systolic blood pressures.

These substudy data are encouraging, but it is important to recognize that the previously published and larger SPRINT MIND trial did not achieve its endpoint. In that study, the protection against dementia was nonsignificant (HR, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.04).

In addition, the lower loss in white matter volume with intensive blood pressure lowering in the MRI substudy was accompanied with a greater loss in total brain volume (–30.6 vs. –26.9 cm³), which is considered a potentially negative effect.

As a result, the picture for risk management remains unclear, according to an editorial that accompanied publication of both studies.

“The important clinical question is whether changes of a few cubic millimeters in white matter hyperintensity volume or brain make a difference on brain function,” observed the author of the editorial, Shyam Prabhakaran, MD, of the department of neurology at the University of Chicago.

He believes that there are several findings from both studies that are “encouraging” in regard to blood pressure control for the prevention of dementia, but he also listed many unanswered questions, including why benefits observed to date have been so modest. He speculated that meaningful clinical benefits might depend on a multimodal approach that includes modification of other vascular risk factors, such as elevated lipids.

He also suggested that many issues regarding intensive blood pressure control for preventing dementia are unresolved, suggesting the need for more studies.

Not least, “later blood-pressure lowering interventions require careful monitoring for the potential cognitive harm associated with late-life hypotension,” Dr. Prabhakaran noted. Calling the effects of blood pressure control on brain health “nuanced,” he concluded that there is an opportunity for blood pressure modifications to prevent dementia, but stressed that optimal blood pressure targets for the purposes of preventing dementia are unknown.

The ARIC and SPRINT studies are supported by the National Institutes of Health. Several authors reported relationships with industry but no conflicts of interest relevant to this study.

SOURCES: Walker KA et al. JAMA. 2019;322(6):535-45; SPRINT MIND investigators. JAMA. 2019;322(6):524-34; Prabhakaran S. JAMA. 2019;322(6):512-3

Uncontrolled hypertension among individuals aged 45-65 years of age is associated with an increased risk of subsequent dementia, according to a relatively large prospective population-based cohort study that followed patients for almost 30 years.

Ingram Publishing/ThinkStock

Even though previously published studies have not conclusively linked blood pressure control with a reduction in dementia risk, a second study, published simultaneously, did link blood pressure control with a smaller increase in white matter lesions, which are a marker of dementia risk. However, a reduction in total brain volume that accompanied this protection raised concern.

In the first of the two reports published Aug. 13 in JAMA, individuals 45-65 years of age participating in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study were followed for cognitive function in relation to blood pressure. The baseline visit took place in 1987-1989. Cognitive function was also evaluated at the fifth visit, which took place in 2011-2013, and the sixth visit, which took place in 2016-2017.

At the sixth visit, the incidence of dementia among patients who were normotensive at baseline and also normotensive at the fifth visit was 1.31 per 100 person-years. For those with hypertension (greater than 140/90 mm Hg) at the fifth visit but normotensive at baseline, the incidence was 1.99 per 100 patient-years. For those with hypertension at both time points, the incidence was 4.26 per 100 patient-years.

When translated into hazard ratios, those with midlife and late-life hypertension were nearly 50% more likely to develop dementia (HR, 1.49) relative to those who remained normotensive. For those who had only midlife hypertension, the risk was also significantly increased (HR, 1.41) relative to those who remained normotensive at both time points.

Those with midlife hypertension but late-life hypotension were also found to be at greater risk of dementia (HR, 1.62) relative to those who remained normotensive.

These data support the premise that uncontrolled midlife hypertension increases risk of dementia but do not touch on whether blood pressure reductions reduce this risk. However, a second study published simultaneously provided at least some evidence that blood pressure control might offer some protection.

In this report, which is a substudy of the previously published Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) MIND trial, brain volume changes were evaluated via MRI in 449 of the more than 2,000 patients included in the previously published trial (Williamson JD et al. JAMA. 2019;321[6]:553-61).

After a median 3.4 years of follow-up, mean white matter lesion volume increased only 0.92 cm³ in patients receiving intensive systolic blood pressure control, defined as less than 120 mm Hg, versus 1.45 cm³ in those with higher systolic blood pressures.

These substudy data are encouraging, but it is important to recognize that the previously published and larger SPRINT MIND trial did not achieve its endpoint. In that study, the protection against dementia was nonsignificant (HR, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.04).

In addition, the lower loss in white matter volume with intensive blood pressure lowering in the MRI substudy was accompanied with a greater loss in total brain volume (–30.6 vs. –26.9 cm³), which is considered a potentially negative effect.

As a result, the picture for risk management remains unclear, according to an editorial that accompanied publication of both studies.

“The important clinical question is whether changes of a few cubic millimeters in white matter hyperintensity volume or brain make a difference on brain function,” observed the author of the editorial, Shyam Prabhakaran, MD, of the department of neurology at the University of Chicago.

He believes that there are several findings from both studies that are “encouraging” in regard to blood pressure control for the prevention of dementia, but he also listed many unanswered questions, including why benefits observed to date have been so modest. He speculated that meaningful clinical benefits might depend on a multimodal approach that includes modification of other vascular risk factors, such as elevated lipids.

He also suggested that many issues regarding intensive blood pressure control for preventing dementia are unresolved, suggesting the need for more studies.

Not least, “later blood-pressure lowering interventions require careful monitoring for the potential cognitive harm associated with late-life hypotension,” Dr. Prabhakaran noted. Calling the effects of blood pressure control on brain health “nuanced,” he concluded that there is an opportunity for blood pressure modifications to prevent dementia, but stressed that optimal blood pressure targets for the purposes of preventing dementia are unknown.

The ARIC and SPRINT studies are supported by the National Institutes of Health. Several authors reported relationships with industry but no conflicts of interest relevant to this study.

SOURCES: Walker KA et al. JAMA. 2019;322(6):535-45; SPRINT MIND investigators. JAMA. 2019;322(6):524-34; Prabhakaran S. JAMA. 2019;322(6):512-3