Nephrology

Bardoxolone methyl may have reduced the risk of end-stage renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and stage 4 chronic kidney disease in a phase III clinical trial, but researchers stopped the study early after patients taking the drug had an increased rate of cardiovascular deaths, heart failure events, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke.

The BEACON trial had only an estimated 40% statistical power to determine bardoxolone methyl’s true effects, given its termination because of safety concerns, according to data reported at the annual Kidney Week meeting sponsored by the American Society of Nephrology.

The findings were simultaneously reported online Nov. 9 in the New England Journal of Medicine (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1306033).

Bardoxolone methyl, the most potent known activator of a transcription factor that regulates antioxidant genes, was previously shown to raise the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with diabetes-related kidney disease. However, it also increased the incidence of albuminuria and induced unintended weight loss.

To determine whether longer-term treatment with bardoxolone methyl might translate that eGFR benefit into a slower progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), Dr. Dick de Zeeuw of the University of Groningen (the Netherlands) and his associates performed the double-blind BEACON trial (Bardoxolone Methyl Evaluation in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Occurrence of Renal Events).

BEACON was sponsored by Reata Pharmaceuticals and included patients from the United States, Europe, Australia, Canada, Israel, and Mexico, resulting in a diverse patient population with regard to age, race/ethnicity, and area of residence. Both diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy were common comorbidities, as was cardiovascular disease.

The 2,185 study participants had type 2 diabetes and moderate to severe chronic kidney diseases, with a baseline eGFR of 15 to less than 30 mL/min per 1.73 m² of body surface area. They were randomly assigned to receive either once-daily bardoxolone methyl 20 mg (1,088 patients) or a matching placebo (1,097 patients), along with conventional background therapies given at the discretion of their treating physicians. Those included inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, insulin or other hypoglycemic agents, and appropriate cardiovascular medications.

The median duration of exposure was 7 months for bardoxolone methyl and 8 months for placebo, and the median follow-up for both was 9 months.

Bardoxolone significantly improved eGFR, compared with placebo, and fewer patients who took the drug progressed to ESRD. But BEACON was terminated early because of an excess of CV events among patients receiving bardoxolone methyl. That "truncated" study duration limited the trial’s statistical power.

The primary endpoint was a composite of progression to ESRD or cardiovascular death, and it occurred in 6% of both study groups. However, deaths from CV causes were significantly more frequent in the active treatment group (27 patients) than in the placebo group (19 patients), with a hazard ratio of 1.44, Dr. de Zeeuw reported.

In particular, 96 patients in the bardoxolone group had heart failure (HF) events, compared with only 55 patients in the placebo group. Moreover, significantly more of the HF events in the active treatment group were severe enough to require hospitalization or cause death.

Similarly, significantly more patients taking bardoxolone methyl had a composite outcome of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, HF hospitalization, or CV death. And the number of deaths from any cause was greater – though not significantly – with bardoxolone methyl (44 deaths) than with placebo (31 deaths) (HR, 1.47; P = .10).

Compared with placebo, bardoxolone methyl also raised blood pressure and heart rate, increased levels of B-type natriuretic peptide, raised the rate of albuminuria, and caused substantial unintended weight loss. The investigators were unable to determine whether there was a loss of body fat, intracellular (that is, skeletal muscle) water, or extracellular (interstitial) water. There was a concomitant fall in serum albumin and hemoglobin levels, which may reflect hemodilution caused by fluid retention, the investigators found.

The increases in blood pressure and heart rate "constitute a potentially potent combination of factors that are likely to precipitate HF in an at-risk population." and the increase in B-type natriuretic peptide "is consistent with an increase in left ventricular wall stress," Dr. de Zeeuw said.

The investigators attempted to identify patient characteristics that might be associated with the development of HF in the bardoxolone methyl recipients, but were unable to do so.

Reata Pharmaceuticals funded the BEACON trial. Dr. de Zeeuw reported ties to AbbVie, Astellas, Chemocentryx, Johnson & Johnson, and Reata, and his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

*This article was updated November 11, 2013.

Bardoxolone methyl may have reduced the risk of end-stage renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and stage 4 chronic kidney disease in a phase III clinical trial, but researchers stopped the study early after patients taking the drug had an increased rate of cardiovascular deaths, heart failure events, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke.

The BEACON trial had only an estimated 40% statistical power to determine bardoxolone methyl’s true effects, given its termination because of safety concerns, according to data reported at the annual Kidney Week meeting sponsored by the American Society of Nephrology.

The findings were simultaneously reported online Nov. 9 in the New England Journal of Medicine (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1306033).

Bardoxolone methyl, the most potent known activator of a transcription factor that regulates antioxidant genes, was previously shown to raise the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with diabetes-related kidney disease. However, it also increased the incidence of albuminuria and induced unintended weight loss.

To determine whether longer-term treatment with bardoxolone methyl might translate that eGFR benefit into a slower progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), Dr. Dick de Zeeuw of the University of Groningen (the Netherlands) and his associates performed the double-blind BEACON trial (Bardoxolone Methyl Evaluation in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Occurrence of Renal Events).

BEACON was sponsored by Reata Pharmaceuticals and included patients from the United States, Europe, Australia, Canada, Israel, and Mexico, resulting in a diverse patient population with regard to age, race/ethnicity, and area of residence. Both diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy were common comorbidities, as was cardiovascular disease.

The 2,185 study participants had type 2 diabetes and moderate to severe chronic kidney diseases, with a baseline eGFR of 15 to less than 30 mL/min per 1.73 m² of body surface area. They were randomly assigned to receive either once-daily bardoxolone methyl 20 mg (1,088 patients) or a matching placebo (1,097 patients), along with conventional background therapies given at the discretion of their treating physicians. Those included inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, insulin or other hypoglycemic agents, and appropriate cardiovascular medications.

The median duration of exposure was 7 months for bardoxolone methyl and 8 months for placebo, and the median follow-up for both was 9 months.

Bardoxolone significantly improved eGFR, compared with placebo, and fewer patients who took the drug progressed to ESRD. But BEACON was terminated early because of an excess of CV events among patients receiving bardoxolone methyl. That "truncated" study duration limited the trial’s statistical power.

The primary endpoint was a composite of progression to ESRD or cardiovascular death, and it occurred in 6% of both study groups. However, deaths from CV causes were significantly more frequent in the active treatment group (27 patients) than in the placebo group (19 patients), with a hazard ratio of 1.44, Dr. de Zeeuw reported.

In particular, 96 patients in the bardoxolone group had heart failure (HF) events, compared with only 55 patients in the placebo group. Moreover, significantly more of the HF events in the active treatment group were severe enough to require hospitalization or cause death.

Similarly, significantly more patients taking bardoxolone methyl had a composite outcome of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, HF hospitalization, or CV death. And the number of deaths from any cause was greater – though not significantly – with bardoxolone methyl (44 deaths) than with placebo (31 deaths) (HR, 1.47; P = .10).

Compared with placebo, bardoxolone methyl also raised blood pressure and heart rate, increased levels of B-type natriuretic peptide, raised the rate of albuminuria, and caused substantial unintended weight loss. The investigators were unable to determine whether there was a loss of body fat, intracellular (that is, skeletal muscle) water, or extracellular (interstitial) water. There was a concomitant fall in serum albumin and hemoglobin levels, which may reflect hemodilution caused by fluid retention, the investigators found.

The increases in blood pressure and heart rate "constitute a potentially potent combination of factors that are likely to precipitate HF in an at-risk population." and the increase in B-type natriuretic peptide "is consistent with an increase in left ventricular wall stress," Dr. de Zeeuw said.

The investigators attempted to identify patient characteristics that might be associated with the development of HF in the bardoxolone methyl recipients, but were unable to do so.

Reata Pharmaceuticals funded the BEACON trial. Dr. de Zeeuw reported ties to AbbVie, Astellas, Chemocentryx, Johnson & Johnson, and Reata, and his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

*This article was updated November 11, 2013.

Bardoxolone methyl may have reduced the risk of end-stage renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and stage 4 chronic kidney disease in a phase III clinical trial, but researchers stopped the study early after patients taking the drug had an increased rate of cardiovascular deaths, heart failure events, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke.

The BEACON trial had only an estimated 40% statistical power to determine bardoxolone methyl’s true effects, given its termination because of safety concerns, according to data reported at the annual Kidney Week meeting sponsored by the American Society of Nephrology.

The findings were simultaneously reported online Nov. 9 in the New England Journal of Medicine (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1306033).

Bardoxolone methyl, the most potent known activator of a transcription factor that regulates antioxidant genes, was previously shown to raise the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with diabetes-related kidney disease. However, it also increased the incidence of albuminuria and induced unintended weight loss.

To determine whether longer-term treatment with bardoxolone methyl might translate that eGFR benefit into a slower progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), Dr. Dick de Zeeuw of the University of Groningen (the Netherlands) and his associates performed the double-blind BEACON trial (Bardoxolone Methyl Evaluation in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Occurrence of Renal Events).

BEACON was sponsored by Reata Pharmaceuticals and included patients from the United States, Europe, Australia, Canada, Israel, and Mexico, resulting in a diverse patient population with regard to age, race/ethnicity, and area of residence. Both diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy were common comorbidities, as was cardiovascular disease.

The 2,185 study participants had type 2 diabetes and moderate to severe chronic kidney diseases, with a baseline eGFR of 15 to less than 30 mL/min per 1.73 m² of body surface area. They were randomly assigned to receive either once-daily bardoxolone methyl 20 mg (1,088 patients) or a matching placebo (1,097 patients), along with conventional background therapies given at the discretion of their treating physicians. Those included inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, insulin or other hypoglycemic agents, and appropriate cardiovascular medications.

The median duration of exposure was 7 months for bardoxolone methyl and 8 months for placebo, and the median follow-up for both was 9 months.

Bardoxolone significantly improved eGFR, compared with placebo, and fewer patients who took the drug progressed to ESRD. But BEACON was terminated early because of an excess of CV events among patients receiving bardoxolone methyl. That "truncated" study duration limited the trial’s statistical power.

The primary endpoint was a composite of progression to ESRD or cardiovascular death, and it occurred in 6% of both study groups. However, deaths from CV causes were significantly more frequent in the active treatment group (27 patients) than in the placebo group (19 patients), with a hazard ratio of 1.44, Dr. de Zeeuw reported.

In particular, 96 patients in the bardoxolone group had heart failure (HF) events, compared with only 55 patients in the placebo group. Moreover, significantly more of the HF events in the active treatment group were severe enough to require hospitalization or cause death.

Similarly, significantly more patients taking bardoxolone methyl had a composite outcome of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, HF hospitalization, or CV death. And the number of deaths from any cause was greater – though not significantly – with bardoxolone methyl (44 deaths) than with placebo (31 deaths) (HR, 1.47; P = .10).

Compared with placebo, bardoxolone methyl also raised blood pressure and heart rate, increased levels of B-type natriuretic peptide, raised the rate of albuminuria, and caused substantial unintended weight loss. The investigators were unable to determine whether there was a loss of body fat, intracellular (that is, skeletal muscle) water, or extracellular (interstitial) water. There was a concomitant fall in serum albumin and hemoglobin levels, which may reflect hemodilution caused by fluid retention, the investigators found.

The increases in blood pressure and heart rate "constitute a potentially potent combination of factors that are likely to precipitate HF in an at-risk population." and the increase in B-type natriuretic peptide "is consistent with an increase in left ventricular wall stress," Dr. de Zeeuw said.

The investigators attempted to identify patient characteristics that might be associated with the development of HF in the bardoxolone methyl recipients, but were unable to do so.

Reata Pharmaceuticals funded the BEACON trial. Dr. de Zeeuw reported ties to AbbVie, Astellas, Chemocentryx, Johnson & Johnson, and Reata, and his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

*This article was updated November 11, 2013.

ATLANTA – Following a Mediterranean-style diet may reduce the risk of chronic kidney disease, findings from the prospective Northern Manhattan Study suggest.

Among 900 subjects from the large community-based, multiethnic cohort who had requisite data available, 14% developed new chronic kidney disease (CKD) during a mean follow-up of 6.9 years. After adjustment for several potential confounders, including demographics, medication use, laboratory values, and medical history, following a Mediterranean-style diet was associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of incident stage 3 CKD, the primary outcome measure of the study (odds ratio, 0.50), Dr. Minesh Khatri of Columbia University, New York, reported at Kidney Week 2013.

Furthermore, each 1-unit increase in a previously developed 9-point score that measured the degree to which a subject followed a Mediterranean-style diet (the MeDi score) was associated with a 17% reduction in CKD risk (OR, 0.83), Dr. Khatri said.

©Dušan Zidar/Fotolia.com

A MeDi score of 5 or higher also was associated with a 42% reduction in the risk of rapid kidney function decline (OR, 0.58), and each 1-point increase in the score was associated with a 12% reduction in risk (OR, 0.88).

Continuous absolute change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was not significantly affected by the MeDi score, but a higher score was associated with a trend toward improvement.

Study participants were adults who were stroke free and had a mean age of 64 years at baseline. They underwent measurement of serum creatinine at baseline and at follow-up, as well as brain magnetic resonance imaging at follow-up. They also completed a dietary questionnaire at baseline, from which the MeDi score was derived.

Most (65%) were Hispanic, and 59% were women. Mean eGFR was 83.1 mL/min, with a mean annualized decline of 1.1 mL/min.

Incident CKD in this study was defined as a follow-up Modification of Diet in Renal Disease eGFR of less than 60 mL/min among subjects with eGFR greater than 60 mL/min at baseline.

"CKD is highly prevalent. The lifetime risk of stage 3 CKD in the United States may be as high as 59% ... [and] the consequences of CKD are of equal magnitude. CKD increases the risk of morbidity and mortality, especially from cardiovascular disease," Dr. Khatri said. Data show that the worse the kidney function, the greater the cardiovascular disease risk and the greater the likelihood of cardiovascular events, he noted.

The financial toll is also extensive, he said during a press briefing at the conference, which was sponsored by the American Society of Nephrology.

"On top of this, the therapeutic armamentarium for CKD is actually relatively limited. We’ve made tremendous strides in treating traditional risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, and protein in the urine, but most patients with CKD still have progressive kidney function decline over time. This therefore means we need novel approaches to prevent and ameliorate progression of CKD," he said.

Diet may be one such approach. Some diets have been studied in the context of improving CKD, but most studies have focused on protein restriction – an approach that may be harmful in some patients, such as the frail elderly. Few studies have looked at diet in the context of preventing CKD.

The Mediterranean diet – which generally includes high intake of fruits, vegetables, legumes, cereals, fish, and heart-healthy monounsaturated fats; lower intake of dairy, meats, and saturated fats; as well as moderate alcohol intake, has received a great deal of attention with respect to potential cardiovascular benefits. Studies have shown it has important benefits, including improvements in blood pressure, endothelial function, cholesterol, inflammation, and overall cardiovascular risk, Dr. Khatri said.

In fact, results from the randomized controlled PREDIMED study, published in April, demonstrated a 30% reduction in cardiovascular risk among those following a Mediterranean diet, compared with those following a standard low-fat diet (N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:1279-90), he noted.

The current study shows that a Mediterranean-style diet may have similarly beneficial effects for reducing CKD risk, which makes sense given the shared risk factors between CKD and cardiovascular disease, he said.

Larger observational trials and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and to elucidate the mechanisms by which a Mediterranean-style diet may protect against kidney disease, he said.

This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Khatri reported having no disclosures.

ATLANTA – Following a Mediterranean-style diet may reduce the risk of chronic kidney disease, findings from the prospective Northern Manhattan Study suggest.

Among 900 subjects from the large community-based, multiethnic cohort who had requisite data available, 14% developed new chronic kidney disease (CKD) during a mean follow-up of 6.9 years. After adjustment for several potential confounders, including demographics, medication use, laboratory values, and medical history, following a Mediterranean-style diet was associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of incident stage 3 CKD, the primary outcome measure of the study (odds ratio, 0.50), Dr. Minesh Khatri of Columbia University, New York, reported at Kidney Week 2013.

Furthermore, each 1-unit increase in a previously developed 9-point score that measured the degree to which a subject followed a Mediterranean-style diet (the MeDi score) was associated with a 17% reduction in CKD risk (OR, 0.83), Dr. Khatri said.

©Dušan Zidar/Fotolia.com

A MeDi score of 5 or higher also was associated with a 42% reduction in the risk of rapid kidney function decline (OR, 0.58), and each 1-point increase in the score was associated with a 12% reduction in risk (OR, 0.88).

Continuous absolute change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was not significantly affected by the MeDi score, but a higher score was associated with a trend toward improvement.

Study participants were adults who were stroke free and had a mean age of 64 years at baseline. They underwent measurement of serum creatinine at baseline and at follow-up, as well as brain magnetic resonance imaging at follow-up. They also completed a dietary questionnaire at baseline, from which the MeDi score was derived.

Most (65%) were Hispanic, and 59% were women. Mean eGFR was 83.1 mL/min, with a mean annualized decline of 1.1 mL/min.

Incident CKD in this study was defined as a follow-up Modification of Diet in Renal Disease eGFR of less than 60 mL/min among subjects with eGFR greater than 60 mL/min at baseline.

"CKD is highly prevalent. The lifetime risk of stage 3 CKD in the United States may be as high as 59% ... [and] the consequences of CKD are of equal magnitude. CKD increases the risk of morbidity and mortality, especially from cardiovascular disease," Dr. Khatri said. Data show that the worse the kidney function, the greater the cardiovascular disease risk and the greater the likelihood of cardiovascular events, he noted.

The financial toll is also extensive, he said during a press briefing at the conference, which was sponsored by the American Society of Nephrology.

"On top of this, the therapeutic armamentarium for CKD is actually relatively limited. We’ve made tremendous strides in treating traditional risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, and protein in the urine, but most patients with CKD still have progressive kidney function decline over time. This therefore means we need novel approaches to prevent and ameliorate progression of CKD," he said.

Diet may be one such approach. Some diets have been studied in the context of improving CKD, but most studies have focused on protein restriction – an approach that may be harmful in some patients, such as the frail elderly. Few studies have looked at diet in the context of preventing CKD.

The Mediterranean diet – which generally includes high intake of fruits, vegetables, legumes, cereals, fish, and heart-healthy monounsaturated fats; lower intake of dairy, meats, and saturated fats; as well as moderate alcohol intake, has received a great deal of attention with respect to potential cardiovascular benefits. Studies have shown it has important benefits, including improvements in blood pressure, endothelial function, cholesterol, inflammation, and overall cardiovascular risk, Dr. Khatri said.

In fact, results from the randomized controlled PREDIMED study, published in April, demonstrated a 30% reduction in cardiovascular risk among those following a Mediterranean diet, compared with those following a standard low-fat diet (N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:1279-90), he noted.

The current study shows that a Mediterranean-style diet may have similarly beneficial effects for reducing CKD risk, which makes sense given the shared risk factors between CKD and cardiovascular disease, he said.

Larger observational trials and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and to elucidate the mechanisms by which a Mediterranean-style diet may protect against kidney disease, he said.

This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Khatri reported having no disclosures.

ATLANTA – Following a Mediterranean-style diet may reduce the risk of chronic kidney disease, findings from the prospective Northern Manhattan Study suggest.

Among 900 subjects from the large community-based, multiethnic cohort who had requisite data available, 14% developed new chronic kidney disease (CKD) during a mean follow-up of 6.9 years. After adjustment for several potential confounders, including demographics, medication use, laboratory values, and medical history, following a Mediterranean-style diet was associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of incident stage 3 CKD, the primary outcome measure of the study (odds ratio, 0.50), Dr. Minesh Khatri of Columbia University, New York, reported at Kidney Week 2013.

Furthermore, each 1-unit increase in a previously developed 9-point score that measured the degree to which a subject followed a Mediterranean-style diet (the MeDi score) was associated with a 17% reduction in CKD risk (OR, 0.83), Dr. Khatri said.

©Dušan Zidar/Fotolia.com

A MeDi score of 5 or higher also was associated with a 42% reduction in the risk of rapid kidney function decline (OR, 0.58), and each 1-point increase in the score was associated with a 12% reduction in risk (OR, 0.88).

Continuous absolute change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was not significantly affected by the MeDi score, but a higher score was associated with a trend toward improvement.

Study participants were adults who were stroke free and had a mean age of 64 years at baseline. They underwent measurement of serum creatinine at baseline and at follow-up, as well as brain magnetic resonance imaging at follow-up. They also completed a dietary questionnaire at baseline, from which the MeDi score was derived.

Most (65%) were Hispanic, and 59% were women. Mean eGFR was 83.1 mL/min, with a mean annualized decline of 1.1 mL/min.

Incident CKD in this study was defined as a follow-up Modification of Diet in Renal Disease eGFR of less than 60 mL/min among subjects with eGFR greater than 60 mL/min at baseline.

"CKD is highly prevalent. The lifetime risk of stage 3 CKD in the United States may be as high as 59% ... [and] the consequences of CKD are of equal magnitude. CKD increases the risk of morbidity and mortality, especially from cardiovascular disease," Dr. Khatri said. Data show that the worse the kidney function, the greater the cardiovascular disease risk and the greater the likelihood of cardiovascular events, he noted.

The financial toll is also extensive, he said during a press briefing at the conference, which was sponsored by the American Society of Nephrology.

"On top of this, the therapeutic armamentarium for CKD is actually relatively limited. We’ve made tremendous strides in treating traditional risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, and protein in the urine, but most patients with CKD still have progressive kidney function decline over time. This therefore means we need novel approaches to prevent and ameliorate progression of CKD," he said.

Diet may be one such approach. Some diets have been studied in the context of improving CKD, but most studies have focused on protein restriction – an approach that may be harmful in some patients, such as the frail elderly. Few studies have looked at diet in the context of preventing CKD.

The Mediterranean diet – which generally includes high intake of fruits, vegetables, legumes, cereals, fish, and heart-healthy monounsaturated fats; lower intake of dairy, meats, and saturated fats; as well as moderate alcohol intake, has received a great deal of attention with respect to potential cardiovascular benefits. Studies have shown it has important benefits, including improvements in blood pressure, endothelial function, cholesterol, inflammation, and overall cardiovascular risk, Dr. Khatri said.

In fact, results from the randomized controlled PREDIMED study, published in April, demonstrated a 30% reduction in cardiovascular risk among those following a Mediterranean diet, compared with those following a standard low-fat diet (N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:1279-90), he noted.

The current study shows that a Mediterranean-style diet may have similarly beneficial effects for reducing CKD risk, which makes sense given the shared risk factors between CKD and cardiovascular disease, he said.

Larger observational trials and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and to elucidate the mechanisms by which a Mediterranean-style diet may protect against kidney disease, he said.

This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Khatri reported having no disclosures.

LAS VEGAS – In a study of patients who experienced a failed midurethral sling, urethral bulking injection was associated with a greater than threefold increased risk of failure compared with a repeat midurethral sling procedure, a retrospective analysis showed.

In addition, the diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency conferred a greater than fourfold risk of failure compared with patients without the diagnosis, regardless of which procedure was performed.

Those are findings from the largest cohort study to date evaluating failure of midurethral sling (MUS), and the only one to include both repeat MUS procedures and urethral bulking injections.

"This study provides important baseline data for surgeons when faced with MUS failure," Dr. Anthony Gaddi said at the annual meeting of the American Urogynecologic Society. "Prospective, randomized data with validated subjective and objective outcomes is warranted."

In an effort to compare the efficacy and safety of a repeat MUS procedure with urethral bulking injection after failed primary MUS, Dr. Gaddi and his associates performed an electronic chart review of patients from the Southern California Permanente Medical Group who underwent MUS for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) between 2008 and 2011.

The primary outcome was a measure of subjective failure, defined as a complaint of SUI, or objective failure, defined as documentation of a positive cough stress test, urodynamic stress incontinence, or reoperation for SUI, said Dr. Gaddi of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of California, Irvine. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and adverse events.

For the 7,412 MUS procedures performed between 2008 and 2011, there were 165 repeat procedures for sling failure. Of these, 98 were repeat MUS procedures and 67 were urethral bulking injections. The mean age of patients was 58 years, their mean body mass index was 29.3 kg/m², 65% were menopausal, and 59% were white.

Dr. Gaddi reported that there were 11 failures in the MUS group (11.2%), compared with 26 failures in the bulking group (38.8%), a difference that reached significance (P less than .01).

In multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients who underwent urethral bulking injections experienced a 3.7-fold increased risk of failure compared with those in the repeat MUS group. In addition, patients with a preoperative diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency experienced a 4.45-fold higher risk of failure compared with those who had no such deficiency, regardless of which procedure was performed.

Perioperative complications were similar between the two groups, "suggesting that both are safe options in this cohort," Dr. Gaddi said.

He acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its retrospective design, and "difficulty standardizing our definition of failure. The low number of complications among our repeat procedures limits conclusions that can be made about safety."

Dr. Gaddi said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.

[email protected]

LAS VEGAS – In a study of patients who experienced a failed midurethral sling, urethral bulking injection was associated with a greater than threefold increased risk of failure compared with a repeat midurethral sling procedure, a retrospective analysis showed.

In addition, the diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency conferred a greater than fourfold risk of failure compared with patients without the diagnosis, regardless of which procedure was performed.

Those are findings from the largest cohort study to date evaluating failure of midurethral sling (MUS), and the only one to include both repeat MUS procedures and urethral bulking injections.

"This study provides important baseline data for surgeons when faced with MUS failure," Dr. Anthony Gaddi said at the annual meeting of the American Urogynecologic Society. "Prospective, randomized data with validated subjective and objective outcomes is warranted."

In an effort to compare the efficacy and safety of a repeat MUS procedure with urethral bulking injection after failed primary MUS, Dr. Gaddi and his associates performed an electronic chart review of patients from the Southern California Permanente Medical Group who underwent MUS for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) between 2008 and 2011.

The primary outcome was a measure of subjective failure, defined as a complaint of SUI, or objective failure, defined as documentation of a positive cough stress test, urodynamic stress incontinence, or reoperation for SUI, said Dr. Gaddi of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of California, Irvine. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and adverse events.

For the 7,412 MUS procedures performed between 2008 and 2011, there were 165 repeat procedures for sling failure. Of these, 98 were repeat MUS procedures and 67 were urethral bulking injections. The mean age of patients was 58 years, their mean body mass index was 29.3 kg/m², 65% were menopausal, and 59% were white.

Dr. Gaddi reported that there were 11 failures in the MUS group (11.2%), compared with 26 failures in the bulking group (38.8%), a difference that reached significance (P less than .01).

In multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients who underwent urethral bulking injections experienced a 3.7-fold increased risk of failure compared with those in the repeat MUS group. In addition, patients with a preoperative diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency experienced a 4.45-fold higher risk of failure compared with those who had no such deficiency, regardless of which procedure was performed.

Perioperative complications were similar between the two groups, "suggesting that both are safe options in this cohort," Dr. Gaddi said.

He acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its retrospective design, and "difficulty standardizing our definition of failure. The low number of complications among our repeat procedures limits conclusions that can be made about safety."

Dr. Gaddi said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.

[email protected]

LAS VEGAS – In a study of patients who experienced a failed midurethral sling, urethral bulking injection was associated with a greater than threefold increased risk of failure compared with a repeat midurethral sling procedure, a retrospective analysis showed.

In addition, the diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency conferred a greater than fourfold risk of failure compared with patients without the diagnosis, regardless of which procedure was performed.

Those are findings from the largest cohort study to date evaluating failure of midurethral sling (MUS), and the only one to include both repeat MUS procedures and urethral bulking injections.

"This study provides important baseline data for surgeons when faced with MUS failure," Dr. Anthony Gaddi said at the annual meeting of the American Urogynecologic Society. "Prospective, randomized data with validated subjective and objective outcomes is warranted."

In an effort to compare the efficacy and safety of a repeat MUS procedure with urethral bulking injection after failed primary MUS, Dr. Gaddi and his associates performed an electronic chart review of patients from the Southern California Permanente Medical Group who underwent MUS for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) between 2008 and 2011.

The primary outcome was a measure of subjective failure, defined as a complaint of SUI, or objective failure, defined as documentation of a positive cough stress test, urodynamic stress incontinence, or reoperation for SUI, said Dr. Gaddi of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of California, Irvine. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and adverse events.

For the 7,412 MUS procedures performed between 2008 and 2011, there were 165 repeat procedures for sling failure. Of these, 98 were repeat MUS procedures and 67 were urethral bulking injections. The mean age of patients was 58 years, their mean body mass index was 29.3 kg/m², 65% were menopausal, and 59% were white.

Dr. Gaddi reported that there were 11 failures in the MUS group (11.2%), compared with 26 failures in the bulking group (38.8%), a difference that reached significance (P less than .01).

In multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients who underwent urethral bulking injections experienced a 3.7-fold increased risk of failure compared with those in the repeat MUS group. In addition, patients with a preoperative diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency experienced a 4.45-fold higher risk of failure compared with those who had no such deficiency, regardless of which procedure was performed.

Perioperative complications were similar between the two groups, "suggesting that both are safe options in this cohort," Dr. Gaddi said.

He acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its retrospective design, and "difficulty standardizing our definition of failure. The low number of complications among our repeat procedures limits conclusions that can be made about safety."

Dr. Gaddi said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.

[email protected]

LAS VEGAS – Onabotulinum toxin A and anticholinergic medications have similar cost effectiveness in the first 6 months of treatment for urge urinary incontinence, results from a multicenter randomized trial showed.

However, if costs and outcomes are considered through 9 months, Botox has significantly lower costs than anticholinergics but similar urge urinary incontinence (UUI) control, Dr. Anthony G. Visco reported at the annual meeting of the American Urogynecologic Society.

On behalf of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development–funded Pelvic Floor Disorders Network, Dr. Visco presented findings from an analysis of 231 women who participated in the ABC trial, which directly compared the safety and efficacy of a 6-month regimen of anticholinergic medications (solifenacin or trospium) to a single 100-U injection of Botox (N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;367:1803-13).

The current study sought to compare the cost effectiveness of anticholinergic medications and Botox for the management of urge urinary incontinence (UUI). The researchers adopted a societal cost perspective and included both direct costs such as physician visits/procedures and medication costs, as well as indirect costs such as incontinence pads, laundry use, and time lost from work.

Patients were randomized to one of the two groups and were followed for 6 months. At each month the researchers obtained bladder diaries, including the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OABq) and the Patient Global Symptom Control instrument (PGSC). At 6 months, all anticholinergic pills were stopped. Dr. Visco and his associates followed the patients up to an additional 6 months "to look at the effect of Botox using the PGSC scores to determine the duration of adequate symptom control," he said.

The researchers adopted two different measures of efficacy. In the first 6 months, efficacy outcome was the average reduction in UUI episodes, and utilities were obtained from the OABq completed at baseline through 6 months; quality-adjusted life-years were calculated and annualized from 6 months to a full year.

Between 6 and 9 months, the efficacy outcome was adequate symptom control as measured by the PGSC. "We chose 9 months because that was a period of time when half the participants in the Botox group still had adequate symptom control," explained Dr. Visco, chief of urogynecology and female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery at Duke University, Durham, N.C.

Cost analyses assumed that Botox patients incurred no additional costs between months 6 and 9 while those on anticholinergics incurred an additional 3 months of medication costs.

At 6 months the direct medical costs were similar between the anticholinergic and Botox groups ($1,339 vs. $1,266), as were the indirect costs ($150 vs. $106). Both treatments decreased the amount of UUI episodes by 3.3 per day. Both groups also had improvements in total quality-adjusted life-years (0.702 vs. 0.707) and in the annualized cost per quality-adjusted life-year ($57,890 vs. $55,869).

Dr. Visco noted that 74% of study participants who received Botox had adequate symptom control at 6 months. That decreased to 55% at the 9-month mark.

The cost-effectiveness analysis through 9 months revealed that anticholinergics cost $1,942 while Botox cost $1,266. Months of symptom control also were similar between the groups (a mean of 6.36 vs. 6.13, respectively), but in the analysis of cost per month of adequate symptom control, anticholinergics were significantly more expensive: $305 vs. $207 for Botox (P value less than .0001).

Dr. Visco acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the fact that true cost data were not available beyond 6 months and that the researchers evaluated only solifenacin or trospium. In addition, "quality-adjusted life-year data were limited to the first 6 months, and we are unable to comment on the cost effectiveness of multiple injections," he said. "Anticholinergic assumptions were also made between 6 and 9 months."

Dr. Visco said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

LAS VEGAS – Onabotulinum toxin A and anticholinergic medications have similar cost effectiveness in the first 6 months of treatment for urge urinary incontinence, results from a multicenter randomized trial showed.

However, if costs and outcomes are considered through 9 months, Botox has significantly lower costs than anticholinergics but similar urge urinary incontinence (UUI) control, Dr. Anthony G. Visco reported at the annual meeting of the American Urogynecologic Society.

On behalf of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development–funded Pelvic Floor Disorders Network, Dr. Visco presented findings from an analysis of 231 women who participated in the ABC trial, which directly compared the safety and efficacy of a 6-month regimen of anticholinergic medications (solifenacin or trospium) to a single 100-U injection of Botox (N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;367:1803-13).

The current study sought to compare the cost effectiveness of anticholinergic medications and Botox for the management of urge urinary incontinence (UUI). The researchers adopted a societal cost perspective and included both direct costs such as physician visits/procedures and medication costs, as well as indirect costs such as incontinence pads, laundry use, and time lost from work.

Patients were randomized to one of the two groups and were followed for 6 months. At each month the researchers obtained bladder diaries, including the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OABq) and the Patient Global Symptom Control instrument (PGSC). At 6 months, all anticholinergic pills were stopped. Dr. Visco and his associates followed the patients up to an additional 6 months "to look at the effect of Botox using the PGSC scores to determine the duration of adequate symptom control," he said.

The researchers adopted two different measures of efficacy. In the first 6 months, efficacy outcome was the average reduction in UUI episodes, and utilities were obtained from the OABq completed at baseline through 6 months; quality-adjusted life-years were calculated and annualized from 6 months to a full year.

Between 6 and 9 months, the efficacy outcome was adequate symptom control as measured by the PGSC. "We chose 9 months because that was a period of time when half the participants in the Botox group still had adequate symptom control," explained Dr. Visco, chief of urogynecology and female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery at Duke University, Durham, N.C.

Cost analyses assumed that Botox patients incurred no additional costs between months 6 and 9 while those on anticholinergics incurred an additional 3 months of medication costs.

At 6 months the direct medical costs were similar between the anticholinergic and Botox groups ($1,339 vs. $1,266), as were the indirect costs ($150 vs. $106). Both treatments decreased the amount of UUI episodes by 3.3 per day. Both groups also had improvements in total quality-adjusted life-years (0.702 vs. 0.707) and in the annualized cost per quality-adjusted life-year ($57,890 vs. $55,869).

Dr. Visco noted that 74% of study participants who received Botox had adequate symptom control at 6 months. That decreased to 55% at the 9-month mark.

The cost-effectiveness analysis through 9 months revealed that anticholinergics cost $1,942 while Botox cost $1,266. Months of symptom control also were similar between the groups (a mean of 6.36 vs. 6.13, respectively), but in the analysis of cost per month of adequate symptom control, anticholinergics were significantly more expensive: $305 vs. $207 for Botox (P value less than .0001).

Dr. Visco acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the fact that true cost data were not available beyond 6 months and that the researchers evaluated only solifenacin or trospium. In addition, "quality-adjusted life-year data were limited to the first 6 months, and we are unable to comment on the cost effectiveness of multiple injections," he said. "Anticholinergic assumptions were also made between 6 and 9 months."

Dr. Visco said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

LAS VEGAS – Onabotulinum toxin A and anticholinergic medications have similar cost effectiveness in the first 6 months of treatment for urge urinary incontinence, results from a multicenter randomized trial showed.

However, if costs and outcomes are considered through 9 months, Botox has significantly lower costs than anticholinergics but similar urge urinary incontinence (UUI) control, Dr. Anthony G. Visco reported at the annual meeting of the American Urogynecologic Society.

On behalf of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development–funded Pelvic Floor Disorders Network, Dr. Visco presented findings from an analysis of 231 women who participated in the ABC trial, which directly compared the safety and efficacy of a 6-month regimen of anticholinergic medications (solifenacin or trospium) to a single 100-U injection of Botox (N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;367:1803-13).

The current study sought to compare the cost effectiveness of anticholinergic medications and Botox for the management of urge urinary incontinence (UUI). The researchers adopted a societal cost perspective and included both direct costs such as physician visits/procedures and medication costs, as well as indirect costs such as incontinence pads, laundry use, and time lost from work.

Patients were randomized to one of the two groups and were followed for 6 months. At each month the researchers obtained bladder diaries, including the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OABq) and the Patient Global Symptom Control instrument (PGSC). At 6 months, all anticholinergic pills were stopped. Dr. Visco and his associates followed the patients up to an additional 6 months "to look at the effect of Botox using the PGSC scores to determine the duration of adequate symptom control," he said.

The researchers adopted two different measures of efficacy. In the first 6 months, efficacy outcome was the average reduction in UUI episodes, and utilities were obtained from the OABq completed at baseline through 6 months; quality-adjusted life-years were calculated and annualized from 6 months to a full year.

Between 6 and 9 months, the efficacy outcome was adequate symptom control as measured by the PGSC. "We chose 9 months because that was a period of time when half the participants in the Botox group still had adequate symptom control," explained Dr. Visco, chief of urogynecology and female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery at Duke University, Durham, N.C.

Cost analyses assumed that Botox patients incurred no additional costs between months 6 and 9 while those on anticholinergics incurred an additional 3 months of medication costs.

At 6 months the direct medical costs were similar between the anticholinergic and Botox groups ($1,339 vs. $1,266), as were the indirect costs ($150 vs. $106). Both treatments decreased the amount of UUI episodes by 3.3 per day. Both groups also had improvements in total quality-adjusted life-years (0.702 vs. 0.707) and in the annualized cost per quality-adjusted life-year ($57,890 vs. $55,869).

Dr. Visco noted that 74% of study participants who received Botox had adequate symptom control at 6 months. That decreased to 55% at the 9-month mark.

The cost-effectiveness analysis through 9 months revealed that anticholinergics cost $1,942 while Botox cost $1,266. Months of symptom control also were similar between the groups (a mean of 6.36 vs. 6.13, respectively), but in the analysis of cost per month of adequate symptom control, anticholinergics were significantly more expensive: $305 vs. $207 for Botox (P value less than .0001).

Dr. Visco acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the fact that true cost data were not available beyond 6 months and that the researchers evaluated only solifenacin or trospium. In addition, "quality-adjusted life-year data were limited to the first 6 months, and we are unable to comment on the cost effectiveness of multiple injections," he said. "Anticholinergic assumptions were also made between 6 and 9 months."

Dr. Visco said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

Cardiovascular disease burden is much greater among elderly patients with chronic kidney disease than in those without, the U.S. Renal Disease System reported.

Among Medicare fee-for-service enrollees aged 66 years and older, the prevalence of heart failure in 2011 was 43% for those with CKD and 19% for those without CKD. The prevalence of stroke and transient ischemic attack was 27% among CKD patients and 20% in those with no CKD. Acute MI prevalence in 2011 was 15% in CKD patients and 6% among enrollees without CKD, according to the USRDS.

[email protected]

Cardiovascular disease burden is much greater among elderly patients with chronic kidney disease than in those without, the U.S. Renal Disease System reported.

Among Medicare fee-for-service enrollees aged 66 years and older, the prevalence of heart failure in 2011 was 43% for those with CKD and 19% for those without CKD. The prevalence of stroke and transient ischemic attack was 27% among CKD patients and 20% in those with no CKD. Acute MI prevalence in 2011 was 15% in CKD patients and 6% among enrollees without CKD, according to the USRDS.

[email protected]

Cardiovascular disease burden is much greater among elderly patients with chronic kidney disease than in those without, the U.S. Renal Disease System reported.

Among Medicare fee-for-service enrollees aged 66 years and older, the prevalence of heart failure in 2011 was 43% for those with CKD and 19% for those without CKD. The prevalence of stroke and transient ischemic attack was 27% among CKD patients and 20% in those with no CKD. Acute MI prevalence in 2011 was 15% in CKD patients and 6% among enrollees without CKD, according to the USRDS.

[email protected]

Q If a pregnant woman has mild hypertension  (eg, 140/90 mm Hg) but no albuminuria, is she at higher risk for kidney disease as she ages?

Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia are two types of hypertension that occur during pregnancy. Both occur after 20 weeks’ gestation and include a blood pressure reading greater than 140/90 mm Hg and no maternal history of hypertension. Proteinuria does not occur in gestational hypertension as it does in preeclampsia (proteinuria ≥ 300 mg in a 24-h urine collection).

One study evaluated more than 26,000 Taiwanese women with hypertension during pregnancy and compared them to more than 200,000 women without hypertension during pregnancy. It was found that hypertension during pregnancy increased the risk for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) later in life. Preeclampsia and ­eclampsia were even more likely to increase the risk for ESRD, ­compared with gestational hypertension.¹

Preeclampsia occurs after 20 weeks’ gestation and includes elevated blood pressure (≥ 140 mm Hg systolic or ≥ 90 mm Hg diastolic) and proteinuria (≥ 0.3 g in 24 h).  Severe preeclampsia develops with the addition of worsening hypertension and proteinuria, oliguria less than 500 mL in 24 h, thrombocytopenia, hemolysis, el­e­vated liver enzymes, low platelets, pulmonary edema, and fetal growth restriction. Eclampsia is when seizures occur in addition to preeclampsia.² Gestational hypertension has also been linked with a higher risk for ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarcts and death, heart failure, ischem-
ic stroke, kidney disease, and diabetes.³

Because of the association between hypertension during pregnancy and subsequent development of CKD, it is very important that mothers who have hypertension during pregnancy continue to have their renal function monitored after delivery.

Mandy Trolinger, MS, RD, PA-C

Denver Nephrology
Denver, CO

Personal Note: Mandy is a two-time kidney transplant recipient. She delivered a healthy baby boy in 2012.

REFERENCES

1. Wang I-K, Muo C-H, Liang C-C, et al.  Association between hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and end-stage renal disease: a population-based study. CMAJ. 2013;85: 207-213.

2. McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA, Tierney LM, et al. Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment. 47th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Lange; 2008.

3. Männistö T, Mendola P, Vääräsmäki M, et al. Elevated blood pressure in pregnancy and subsequent chronic disease risk. Circulation. 2013;127:681-690.

4. Nevis IF, Reitsma A, Dominic A, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:2587-2598.

5. Hou S. Pregnancy in chronic renal insufficiency and end-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;33:235-252.

6. Davison JM. Dialysis, transplantation, and pregnancy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1991;17:127-132.

7. Asamiya Y, Otsubo S, Matsuda Y, et al. The importance of low blood urea nitrogen levels in pregnant patients undergoing hemodialysis to optimize birth weight and gestational age. Kidney Int. 2009;75:1217-1222.

8. Giatras I, Levy DP, Malone FD, et al. Pregnancy during dialysis: case report and management guidelines. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:3266-3272.

9. McKay DB, Josephson MA. Pregnancy in recipients of solid organs—effects on mother and child. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1281-1293.

10. Sifontis NM, Coscia LA, Constantinescu S, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients with exposure to mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Transplantation. 2006;82:1698-1702.

11. Kainz A, Harabacz I, Cowlrick IS, et al. Review of the course and outcome of 100 pregnancies in 84 women treated with tacrolimus. Transplantation. 2000;70:1718-1721.

12. Josephson MA. Pregnancy in renal transplant recipients: more questions answered, still more asked. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8: 182-183.

Q If a pregnant woman has mild hypertension  (eg, 140/90 mm Hg) but no albuminuria, is she at higher risk for kidney disease as she ages?

Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia are two types of hypertension that occur during pregnancy. Both occur after 20 weeks’ gestation and include a blood pressure reading greater than 140/90 mm Hg and no maternal history of hypertension. Proteinuria does not occur in gestational hypertension as it does in preeclampsia (proteinuria ≥ 300 mg in a 24-h urine collection).

One study evaluated more than 26,000 Taiwanese women with hypertension during pregnancy and compared them to more than 200,000 women without hypertension during pregnancy. It was found that hypertension during pregnancy increased the risk for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) later in life. Preeclampsia and ­eclampsia were even more likely to increase the risk for ESRD, ­compared with gestational hypertension.¹

Preeclampsia occurs after 20 weeks’ gestation and includes elevated blood pressure (≥ 140 mm Hg systolic or ≥ 90 mm Hg diastolic) and proteinuria (≥ 0.3 g in 24 h).  Severe preeclampsia develops with the addition of worsening hypertension and proteinuria, oliguria less than 500 mL in 24 h, thrombocytopenia, hemolysis, el­e­vated liver enzymes, low platelets, pulmonary edema, and fetal growth restriction. Eclampsia is when seizures occur in addition to preeclampsia.² Gestational hypertension has also been linked with a higher risk for ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarcts and death, heart failure, ischem-
ic stroke, kidney disease, and diabetes.³

Because of the association between hypertension during pregnancy and subsequent development of CKD, it is very important that mothers who have hypertension during pregnancy continue to have their renal function monitored after delivery.

Mandy Trolinger, MS, RD, PA-C

Denver Nephrology
Denver, CO

Personal Note: Mandy is a two-time kidney transplant recipient. She delivered a healthy baby boy in 2012.

REFERENCES

1. Wang I-K, Muo C-H, Liang C-C, et al.  Association between hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and end-stage renal disease: a population-based study. CMAJ. 2013;85: 207-213.

2. McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA, Tierney LM, et al. Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment. 47th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Lange; 2008.

3. Männistö T, Mendola P, Vääräsmäki M, et al. Elevated blood pressure in pregnancy and subsequent chronic disease risk. Circulation. 2013;127:681-690.

4. Nevis IF, Reitsma A, Dominic A, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:2587-2598.

5. Hou S. Pregnancy in chronic renal insufficiency and end-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;33:235-252.

6. Davison JM. Dialysis, transplantation, and pregnancy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1991;17:127-132.

7. Asamiya Y, Otsubo S, Matsuda Y, et al. The importance of low blood urea nitrogen levels in pregnant patients undergoing hemodialysis to optimize birth weight and gestational age. Kidney Int. 2009;75:1217-1222.

8. Giatras I, Levy DP, Malone FD, et al. Pregnancy during dialysis: case report and management guidelines. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:3266-3272.

9. McKay DB, Josephson MA. Pregnancy in recipients of solid organs—effects on mother and child. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1281-1293.

10. Sifontis NM, Coscia LA, Constantinescu S, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients with exposure to mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Transplantation. 2006;82:1698-1702.

11. Kainz A, Harabacz I, Cowlrick IS, et al. Review of the course and outcome of 100 pregnancies in 84 women treated with tacrolimus. Transplantation. 2000;70:1718-1721.

12. Josephson MA. Pregnancy in renal transplant recipients: more questions answered, still more asked. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8: 182-183.

Q If a pregnant woman has mild hypertension  (eg, 140/90 mm Hg) but no albuminuria, is she at higher risk for kidney disease as she ages?

Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia are two types of hypertension that occur during pregnancy. Both occur after 20 weeks’ gestation and include a blood pressure reading greater than 140/90 mm Hg and no maternal history of hypertension. Proteinuria does not occur in gestational hypertension as it does in preeclampsia (proteinuria ≥ 300 mg in a 24-h urine collection).

One study evaluated more than 26,000 Taiwanese women with hypertension during pregnancy and compared them to more than 200,000 women without hypertension during pregnancy. It was found that hypertension during pregnancy increased the risk for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) later in life. Preeclampsia and ­eclampsia were even more likely to increase the risk for ESRD, ­compared with gestational hypertension.¹

Preeclampsia occurs after 20 weeks’ gestation and includes elevated blood pressure (≥ 140 mm Hg systolic or ≥ 90 mm Hg diastolic) and proteinuria (≥ 0.3 g in 24 h).  Severe preeclampsia develops with the addition of worsening hypertension and proteinuria, oliguria less than 500 mL in 24 h, thrombocytopenia, hemolysis, el­e­vated liver enzymes, low platelets, pulmonary edema, and fetal growth restriction. Eclampsia is when seizures occur in addition to preeclampsia.² Gestational hypertension has also been linked with a higher risk for ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarcts and death, heart failure, ischem-
ic stroke, kidney disease, and diabetes.³

Because of the association between hypertension during pregnancy and subsequent development of CKD, it is very important that mothers who have hypertension during pregnancy continue to have their renal function monitored after delivery.

Mandy Trolinger, MS, RD, PA-C

Denver Nephrology
Denver, CO

Personal Note: Mandy is a two-time kidney transplant recipient. She delivered a healthy baby boy in 2012.

REFERENCES

1. Wang I-K, Muo C-H, Liang C-C, et al.  Association between hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and end-stage renal disease: a population-based study. CMAJ. 2013;85: 207-213.

2. McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA, Tierney LM, et al. Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment. 47th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Lange; 2008.

3. Männistö T, Mendola P, Vääräsmäki M, et al. Elevated blood pressure in pregnancy and subsequent chronic disease risk. Circulation. 2013;127:681-690.

4. Nevis IF, Reitsma A, Dominic A, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:2587-2598.

5. Hou S. Pregnancy in chronic renal insufficiency and end-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;33:235-252.

6. Davison JM. Dialysis, transplantation, and pregnancy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1991;17:127-132.

7. Asamiya Y, Otsubo S, Matsuda Y, et al. The importance of low blood urea nitrogen levels in pregnant patients undergoing hemodialysis to optimize birth weight and gestational age. Kidney Int. 2009;75:1217-1222.

8. Giatras I, Levy DP, Malone FD, et al. Pregnancy during dialysis: case report and management guidelines. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:3266-3272.

9. McKay DB, Josephson MA. Pregnancy in recipients of solid organs—effects on mother and child. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1281-1293.

10. Sifontis NM, Coscia LA, Constantinescu S, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients with exposure to mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Transplantation. 2006;82:1698-1702.

11. Kainz A, Harabacz I, Cowlrick IS, et al. Review of the course and outcome of 100 pregnancies in 84 women treated with tacrolimus. Transplantation. 2000;70:1718-1721.

12. Josephson MA. Pregnancy in renal transplant recipients: more questions answered, still more asked. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8: 182-183.

Q) I was having a “discussion” over lunch about CKD, pregnancy, and transplant. I said that dialysis patients cannot get pregnant, but someone said I was wrong. A friend said that transplant patients should not get pregnant because of the toxicity of the immunosuppressant medications they take, but another practitioner said that was in the “olden days.” What is the current state of the CKD, dialysis, and transplant patient and pregnancy? 

The first healthy baby delivered by a pregnant kidney transplant patient was born in 1958. With the advances in treatment of kidney disease, we are now seeing more pregnancies in these patients. However, they are still considered high risk and should be monitored by a transplant nephrologist and a high-risk obstetrician.⁴

 CKD patients (not on dialysis) are at increased risk for pregnancy complications. Maternal risks include gestational hypertension, preeclampsia/eclampsia, ESRD, or death. Fetal complications include prematurity, small-for-gestational-age babies, and stillbirth. It is very important to control hypertension because it is directly linked to fetal outcome; however, not all blood pressure medications are safe in pregnancy. ACE inhibitors, for example, are teratogenic and absolutely contraindicated.⁴

Fertility is decreased in dialysis patients; however, pregnancy occurs in 0.3% to 1.5% of women of childbearing age on dialysis. Pregnancy should be confirmed with an ultrasound because serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin can be falsely elevated in ESRD.⁵

It also can be difficult to monitor pregnancy weight gain due to fluid gains between dialysis treatments. Dialysis prescriptions should be increased either in time or frequency (or both), with a goal of keeping the blood urea nitrogen concentration below 50 mg/dL to improve maternal and fetal outcomes.^6,7 Other important factors to control are metabolic acidosis, hypocalcemia, and anemia (increased erythropoietin-stimulating agents may be needed). Frequent uterine and fetal monitoring is also indicated to prevent preterm labor due to the dialysis process. Preeclampsia, prematurity, low birth weight, and hypertension are the most common risks in these pregnancies.⁸

Renal transplantation often returns fertility to normal and allows pregnancy to occur; however, it is recommended that female patients wait until one year post-transplant if the transplanted kidney is from a living related donor (two years if from a deceased donor), have a serum creatinine level less than 1.5 mg/dL, and a urinary protein level less than 500 mg/d.⁹ The immunosuppression regimen usually needs adjustment because certain immunosuppressants are contraindicated in pregnancy and have been linked to teratogenic effects; however, data is still limited in this area.^10,11 Pregnant transplant recipients are at higher risk for preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm delivery, small-for-gestational-age babies, miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, and congenital abnormalities.¹²

The National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (www.ntpr.giftoflifeinstitute.org/) is an ongoing registry in the United States that reports on transplant pregnancies and their outcomes.  Data collected by the registry show that there have been many healthy pregnancies without any adverse maternal or fetal outcomes among transplant recipients.

Mandy Trolinger, MS, RD, PA-C

Denver Nephrology
Denver, CO

Personal Note: Mandy is a two-time kidney transplant recipient. She delivered a healthy baby boy in 2012.

REFERENCES

1. Wang I-K, Muo C-H, Liang C-C, et al.  Association between hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and end-stage renal disease: a population-based study. CMAJ. 2013;85: 207-213.

2. McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA, Tierney LM, et al. Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment. 47th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Lange; 2008.

3. Männistö T, Mendola P, Vääräsmäki M, et al. Elevated blood pressure in pregnancy and subsequent chronic disease risk. Circulation. 2013;127:681-690.

4. Nevis IF, Reitsma A, Dominic A, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:2587-2598.

5. Hou S. Pregnancy in chronic renal insufficiency and end-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;33:235-252.

6. Davison JM. Dialysis, transplantation, and pregnancy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1991;17:127-132.

7. Asamiya Y, Otsubo S, Matsuda Y, et al. The importance of low blood urea nitrogen levels in pregnant patients undergoing hemodialysis to optimize birth weight and gestational age. Kidney Int. 2009;75:1217-1222.

8. Giatras I, Levy DP, Malone FD, et al. Pregnancy during dialysis: case report and management guidelines. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:3266-3272.

9. McKay DB, Josephson MA. Pregnancy in recipients of solid organs—effects on mother and child. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1281-1293.

10. Sifontis NM, Coscia LA, Constantinescu S, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients with exposure to mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Transplantation. 2006;82:1698-1702.

11. Kainz A, Harabacz I, Cowlrick IS, et al. Review of the course and outcome of 100 pregnancies in 84 women treated with tacrolimus. Transplantation. 2000;70:1718-1721.

12. Josephson MA. Pregnancy in renal transplant recipients: more questions answered, still more asked. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8: 182-183.

Q) I was having a “discussion” over lunch about CKD, pregnancy, and transplant. I said that dialysis patients cannot get pregnant, but someone said I was wrong. A friend said that transplant patients should not get pregnant because of the toxicity of the immunosuppressant medications they take, but another practitioner said that was in the “olden days.” What is the current state of the CKD, dialysis, and transplant patient and pregnancy? 

The first healthy baby delivered by a pregnant kidney transplant patient was born in 1958. With the advances in treatment of kidney disease, we are now seeing more pregnancies in these patients. However, they are still considered high risk and should be monitored by a transplant nephrologist and a high-risk obstetrician.⁴

 CKD patients (not on dialysis) are at increased risk for pregnancy complications. Maternal risks include gestational hypertension, preeclampsia/eclampsia, ESRD, or death. Fetal complications include prematurity, small-for-gestational-age babies, and stillbirth. It is very important to control hypertension because it is directly linked to fetal outcome; however, not all blood pressure medications are safe in pregnancy. ACE inhibitors, for example, are teratogenic and absolutely contraindicated.⁴

Fertility is decreased in dialysis patients; however, pregnancy occurs in 0.3% to 1.5% of women of childbearing age on dialysis. Pregnancy should be confirmed with an ultrasound because serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin can be falsely elevated in ESRD.⁵

It also can be difficult to monitor pregnancy weight gain due to fluid gains between dialysis treatments. Dialysis prescriptions should be increased either in time or frequency (or both), with a goal of keeping the blood urea nitrogen concentration below 50 mg/dL to improve maternal and fetal outcomes.^6,7 Other important factors to control are metabolic acidosis, hypocalcemia, and anemia (increased erythropoietin-stimulating agents may be needed). Frequent uterine and fetal monitoring is also indicated to prevent preterm labor due to the dialysis process. Preeclampsia, prematurity, low birth weight, and hypertension are the most common risks in these pregnancies.⁸

Renal transplantation often returns fertility to normal and allows pregnancy to occur; however, it is recommended that female patients wait until one year post-transplant if the transplanted kidney is from a living related donor (two years if from a deceased donor), have a serum creatinine level less than 1.5 mg/dL, and a urinary protein level less than 500 mg/d.⁹ The immunosuppression regimen usually needs adjustment because certain immunosuppressants are contraindicated in pregnancy and have been linked to teratogenic effects; however, data is still limited in this area.^10,11 Pregnant transplant recipients are at higher risk for preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm delivery, small-for-gestational-age babies, miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, and congenital abnormalities.¹²

The National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (www.ntpr.giftoflifeinstitute.org/) is an ongoing registry in the United States that reports on transplant pregnancies and their outcomes.  Data collected by the registry show that there have been many healthy pregnancies without any adverse maternal or fetal outcomes among transplant recipients.

Mandy Trolinger, MS, RD, PA-C

Denver Nephrology
Denver, CO

Personal Note: Mandy is a two-time kidney transplant recipient. She delivered a healthy baby boy in 2012.

REFERENCES

1. Wang I-K, Muo C-H, Liang C-C, et al.  Association between hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and end-stage renal disease: a population-based study. CMAJ. 2013;85: 207-213.

2. McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA, Tierney LM, et al. Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment. 47th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Lange; 2008.

3. Männistö T, Mendola P, Vääräsmäki M, et al. Elevated blood pressure in pregnancy and subsequent chronic disease risk. Circulation. 2013;127:681-690.

4. Nevis IF, Reitsma A, Dominic A, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:2587-2598.

5. Hou S. Pregnancy in chronic renal insufficiency and end-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;33:235-252.

6. Davison JM. Dialysis, transplantation, and pregnancy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1991;17:127-132.

7. Asamiya Y, Otsubo S, Matsuda Y, et al. The importance of low blood urea nitrogen levels in pregnant patients undergoing hemodialysis to optimize birth weight and gestational age. Kidney Int. 2009;75:1217-1222.

8. Giatras I, Levy DP, Malone FD, et al. Pregnancy during dialysis: case report and management guidelines. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:3266-3272.

9. McKay DB, Josephson MA. Pregnancy in recipients of solid organs—effects on mother and child. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1281-1293.

10. Sifontis NM, Coscia LA, Constantinescu S, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients with exposure to mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Transplantation. 2006;82:1698-1702.

11. Kainz A, Harabacz I, Cowlrick IS, et al. Review of the course and outcome of 100 pregnancies in 84 women treated with tacrolimus. Transplantation. 2000;70:1718-1721.

12. Josephson MA. Pregnancy in renal transplant recipients: more questions answered, still more asked. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8: 182-183.

Q) I was having a “discussion” over lunch about CKD, pregnancy, and transplant. I said that dialysis patients cannot get pregnant, but someone said I was wrong. A friend said that transplant patients should not get pregnant because of the toxicity of the immunosuppressant medications they take, but another practitioner said that was in the “olden days.” What is the current state of the CKD, dialysis, and transplant patient and pregnancy? 

The first healthy baby delivered by a pregnant kidney transplant patient was born in 1958. With the advances in treatment of kidney disease, we are now seeing more pregnancies in these patients. However, they are still considered high risk and should be monitored by a transplant nephrologist and a high-risk obstetrician.⁴

 CKD patients (not on dialysis) are at increased risk for pregnancy complications. Maternal risks include gestational hypertension, preeclampsia/eclampsia, ESRD, or death. Fetal complications include prematurity, small-for-gestational-age babies, and stillbirth. It is very important to control hypertension because it is directly linked to fetal outcome; however, not all blood pressure medications are safe in pregnancy. ACE inhibitors, for example, are teratogenic and absolutely contraindicated.⁴

Fertility is decreased in dialysis patients; however, pregnancy occurs in 0.3% to 1.5% of women of childbearing age on dialysis. Pregnancy should be confirmed with an ultrasound because serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin can be falsely elevated in ESRD.⁵

It also can be difficult to monitor pregnancy weight gain due to fluid gains between dialysis treatments. Dialysis prescriptions should be increased either in time or frequency (or both), with a goal of keeping the blood urea nitrogen concentration below 50 mg/dL to improve maternal and fetal outcomes.^6,7 Other important factors to control are metabolic acidosis, hypocalcemia, and anemia (increased erythropoietin-stimulating agents may be needed). Frequent uterine and fetal monitoring is also indicated to prevent preterm labor due to the dialysis process. Preeclampsia, prematurity, low birth weight, and hypertension are the most common risks in these pregnancies.⁸

Renal transplantation often returns fertility to normal and allows pregnancy to occur; however, it is recommended that female patients wait until one year post-transplant if the transplanted kidney is from a living related donor (two years if from a deceased donor), have a serum creatinine level less than 1.5 mg/dL, and a urinary protein level less than 500 mg/d.⁹ The immunosuppression regimen usually needs adjustment because certain immunosuppressants are contraindicated in pregnancy and have been linked to teratogenic effects; however, data is still limited in this area.^10,11 Pregnant transplant recipients are at higher risk for preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm delivery, small-for-gestational-age babies, miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, and congenital abnormalities.¹²

The National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (www.ntpr.giftoflifeinstitute.org/) is an ongoing registry in the United States that reports on transplant pregnancies and their outcomes.  Data collected by the registry show that there have been many healthy pregnancies without any adverse maternal or fetal outcomes among transplant recipients.

Mandy Trolinger, MS, RD, PA-C

Denver Nephrology
Denver, CO

Personal Note: Mandy is a two-time kidney transplant recipient. She delivered a healthy baby boy in 2012.

REFERENCES

1. Wang I-K, Muo C-H, Liang C-C, et al.  Association between hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and end-stage renal disease: a population-based study. CMAJ. 2013;85: 207-213.

2. McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA, Tierney LM, et al. Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment. 47th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Lange; 2008.

3. Männistö T, Mendola P, Vääräsmäki M, et al. Elevated blood pressure in pregnancy and subsequent chronic disease risk. Circulation. 2013;127:681-690.

4. Nevis IF, Reitsma A, Dominic A, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:2587-2598.

5. Hou S. Pregnancy in chronic renal insufficiency and end-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;33:235-252.

6. Davison JM. Dialysis, transplantation, and pregnancy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1991;17:127-132.

7. Asamiya Y, Otsubo S, Matsuda Y, et al. The importance of low blood urea nitrogen levels in pregnant patients undergoing hemodialysis to optimize birth weight and gestational age. Kidney Int. 2009;75:1217-1222.

8. Giatras I, Levy DP, Malone FD, et al. Pregnancy during dialysis: case report and management guidelines. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:3266-3272.

9. McKay DB, Josephson MA. Pregnancy in recipients of solid organs—effects on mother and child. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1281-1293.

10. Sifontis NM, Coscia LA, Constantinescu S, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients with exposure to mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Transplantation. 2006;82:1698-1702.

11. Kainz A, Harabacz I, Cowlrick IS, et al. Review of the course and outcome of 100 pregnancies in 84 women treated with tacrolimus. Transplantation. 2000;70:1718-1721.

12. Josephson MA. Pregnancy in renal transplant recipients: more questions answered, still more asked. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8: 182-183.

DENVER – Before a new protocol was implemented, antimicrobial dosing in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy varied and was adherent to evidence-based recommendations in about one-quarter of antimicrobial orders, results from a single-center study showed.

"For any kind of renal replacement therapy, there is always an uncertainty as to how much residual antibiotic is being removed, how much residual renal function the patient has, and how much of the antibiotic is actually staying within the patient for them to achieve therapeutic levels of the drug to combat their infection," Jamie Wagner, Pharm.D., said in an interview during a poster session at the annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

"With renal replacement therapy, everything is dependent on the filter, the flow rate, and how much residual renal function the patient has. We set out to try to determine how well the interdisciplinary teams were adhering with dosing recommendations, defined as use of evidence-based dose for each CRRT [continuous renal replacement therapy] modality employed for the entire duration of antibiotics used during CRRT."

Dr. Wagner, an infectious diseases pharmacy fellow at the 802-bed Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, and her associates evaluated 246 antimicrobial orders placed for 43 patients from November 2008 to May 2012. Patients were included in the analysis if they had an order placed for a beta-lactam, vancomycin, tobramycin, gentamicin, or daptomycin; if they received the drug in the ICU; and if they were on CRRT at the time the drug was administered. Patients receiving intermittent hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis were excluded from the study.

Using medical records, the researchers evaluated demographics, CRRT modality, dates of changes in CRRT, and antibiotic dosing information. Each antibiotic order was evaluated for adherence to evidence-based dosing recommendation, which was the primary outcome of interest.

In August 2011, the Henry Ford Health System implemented an institutional guideline for antibiotic dosing in CRRT, which contained a summary of evidence-based dosing recommendations for the most common antimicrobial agents used in the ICU.

Of the 43 patients, 14 met study inclusion criteria before implementation of the guideline (group A), while the remaining 29 met inclusion criteria after implementation of the guideline (group B). The mean ages of patients in both groups were similar (55 years in group A vs. 59 years in group B), as were other variables.

Dr. Wagner reported that no differences were observed in antibiotic use between pre- and postguideline antibiotic orders. The three most commonly prescribed agents were vancomycin (32%), cefepime (21%), and aminoglycosides (15%). Following implementation of the guideline, overall adherence with evidence-based dosing recommendations improved from 24% to 49% between groups A and B, a difference which reached significance (P less than .001).

Four CRRT modalities changed significantly between groups A and B: continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) for 8-12 hours (24% vs. 0%, respectively); sustained, low-efficiency, daily diafiltration (SLEDD) for 8-12 hours with an F8 filter (29% vs. 6%); SLEDD for 8-12 hours with an F250 filter (14% vs. 1%); and SLEDD for 24 hours (11% vs. 75%).

Changes between modalities occurred in 13% of all orders assessed. Variables found to be associated with nonadherent orders were change of CRRT mode that resulted in a new recommended dose (7%), SLEDD for 8-12 hours (15%), and the use of any aminoglycoside (15%).

"Communication is key between all patient care providers on a daily basis," Dr. Wagner concluded. "At Henry Ford Hospital, providers must submit a new order for CRRT every single day for patients requiring antibiotic dosing. There needs to be communication about this between all providers involved in that patient’s care."

She acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including increased use of 24-hour SLEDD during the postguideline period, strict definition for adherence to the guideline, and the inability to systematically evaluate clinical response or residual function.

"Understanding factors associated with nonadherent orders can provide a starting point for clinicians to improve the antimicrobial use process in CRRT," she said.

Dr. Wagner said that she had no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

[email protected]

DENVER – Before a new protocol was implemented, antimicrobial dosing in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy varied and was adherent to evidence-based recommendations in about one-quarter of antimicrobial orders, results from a single-center study showed.

"For any kind of renal replacement therapy, there is always an uncertainty as to how much residual antibiotic is being removed, how much residual renal function the patient has, and how much of the antibiotic is actually staying within the patient for them to achieve therapeutic levels of the drug to combat their infection," Jamie Wagner, Pharm.D., said in an interview during a poster session at the annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

"With renal replacement therapy, everything is dependent on the filter, the flow rate, and how much residual renal function the patient has. We set out to try to determine how well the interdisciplinary teams were adhering with dosing recommendations, defined as use of evidence-based dose for each CRRT [continuous renal replacement therapy] modality employed for the entire duration of antibiotics used during CRRT."

Dr. Wagner, an infectious diseases pharmacy fellow at the 802-bed Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, and her associates evaluated 246 antimicrobial orders placed for 43 patients from November 2008 to May 2012. Patients were included in the analysis if they had an order placed for a beta-lactam, vancomycin, tobramycin, gentamicin, or daptomycin; if they received the drug in the ICU; and if they were on CRRT at the time the drug was administered. Patients receiving intermittent hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis were excluded from the study.

Using medical records, the researchers evaluated demographics, CRRT modality, dates of changes in CRRT, and antibiotic dosing information. Each antibiotic order was evaluated for adherence to evidence-based dosing recommendation, which was the primary outcome of interest.

In August 2011, the Henry Ford Health System implemented an institutional guideline for antibiotic dosing in CRRT, which contained a summary of evidence-based dosing recommendations for the most common antimicrobial agents used in the ICU.

Of the 43 patients, 14 met study inclusion criteria before implementation of the guideline (group A), while the remaining 29 met inclusion criteria after implementation of the guideline (group B). The mean ages of patients in both groups were similar (55 years in group A vs. 59 years in group B), as were other variables.

Dr. Wagner reported that no differences were observed in antibiotic use between pre- and postguideline antibiotic orders. The three most commonly prescribed agents were vancomycin (32%), cefepime (21%), and aminoglycosides (15%). Following implementation of the guideline, overall adherence with evidence-based dosing recommendations improved from 24% to 49% between groups A and B, a difference which reached significance (P less than .001).

Four CRRT modalities changed significantly between groups A and B: continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) for 8-12 hours (24% vs. 0%, respectively); sustained, low-efficiency, daily diafiltration (SLEDD) for 8-12 hours with an F8 filter (29% vs. 6%); SLEDD for 8-12 hours with an F250 filter (14% vs. 1%); and SLEDD for 24 hours (11% vs. 75%).

Changes between modalities occurred in 13% of all orders assessed. Variables found to be associated with nonadherent orders were change of CRRT mode that resulted in a new recommended dose (7%), SLEDD for 8-12 hours (15%), and the use of any aminoglycoside (15%).

"Communication is key between all patient care providers on a daily basis," Dr. Wagner concluded. "At Henry Ford Hospital, providers must submit a new order for CRRT every single day for patients requiring antibiotic dosing. There needs to be communication about this between all providers involved in that patient’s care."

She acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including increased use of 24-hour SLEDD during the postguideline period, strict definition for adherence to the guideline, and the inability to systematically evaluate clinical response or residual function.

"Understanding factors associated with nonadherent orders can provide a starting point for clinicians to improve the antimicrobial use process in CRRT," she said.

Dr. Wagner said that she had no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

[email protected]

DENVER – Before a new protocol was implemented, antimicrobial dosing in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy varied and was adherent to evidence-based recommendations in about one-quarter of antimicrobial orders, results from a single-center study showed.

"For any kind of renal replacement therapy, there is always an uncertainty as to how much residual antibiotic is being removed, how much residual renal function the patient has, and how much of the antibiotic is actually staying within the patient for them to achieve therapeutic levels of the drug to combat their infection," Jamie Wagner, Pharm.D., said in an interview during a poster session at the annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

"With renal replacement therapy, everything is dependent on the filter, the flow rate, and how much residual renal function the patient has. We set out to try to determine how well the interdisciplinary teams were adhering with dosing recommendations, defined as use of evidence-based dose for each CRRT [continuous renal replacement therapy] modality employed for the entire duration of antibiotics used during CRRT."

Dr. Wagner, an infectious diseases pharmacy fellow at the 802-bed Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, and her associates evaluated 246 antimicrobial orders placed for 43 patients from November 2008 to May 2012. Patients were included in the analysis if they had an order placed for a beta-lactam, vancomycin, tobramycin, gentamicin, or daptomycin; if they received the drug in the ICU; and if they were on CRRT at the time the drug was administered. Patients receiving intermittent hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis were excluded from the study.

Using medical records, the researchers evaluated demographics, CRRT modality, dates of changes in CRRT, and antibiotic dosing information. Each antibiotic order was evaluated for adherence to evidence-based dosing recommendation, which was the primary outcome of interest.

In August 2011, the Henry Ford Health System implemented an institutional guideline for antibiotic dosing in CRRT, which contained a summary of evidence-based dosing recommendations for the most common antimicrobial agents used in the ICU.

Of the 43 patients, 14 met study inclusion criteria before implementation of the guideline (group A), while the remaining 29 met inclusion criteria after implementation of the guideline (group B). The mean ages of patients in both groups were similar (55 years in group A vs. 59 years in group B), as were other variables.

Dr. Wagner reported that no differences were observed in antibiotic use between pre- and postguideline antibiotic orders. The three most commonly prescribed agents were vancomycin (32%), cefepime (21%), and aminoglycosides (15%). Following implementation of the guideline, overall adherence with evidence-based dosing recommendations improved from 24% to 49% between groups A and B, a difference which reached significance (P less than .001).

Four CRRT modalities changed significantly between groups A and B: continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) for 8-12 hours (24% vs. 0%, respectively); sustained, low-efficiency, daily diafiltration (SLEDD) for 8-12 hours with an F8 filter (29% vs. 6%); SLEDD for 8-12 hours with an F250 filter (14% vs. 1%); and SLEDD for 24 hours (11% vs. 75%).

Changes between modalities occurred in 13% of all orders assessed. Variables found to be associated with nonadherent orders were change of CRRT mode that resulted in a new recommended dose (7%), SLEDD for 8-12 hours (15%), and the use of any aminoglycoside (15%).

"Communication is key between all patient care providers on a daily basis," Dr. Wagner concluded. "At Henry Ford Hospital, providers must submit a new order for CRRT every single day for patients requiring antibiotic dosing. There needs to be communication about this between all providers involved in that patient’s care."

She acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including increased use of 24-hour SLEDD during the postguideline period, strict definition for adherence to the guideline, and the inability to systematically evaluate clinical response or residual function.

"Understanding factors associated with nonadherent orders can provide a starting point for clinicians to improve the antimicrobial use process in CRRT," she said.

Dr. Wagner said that she had no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

[email protected]