User login
Former Farmer Is Short of Breath
ANSWER
The correct interpretation of this ECG includes normal sinus rhythm with left atrial enlargement and a left bundle branch block (LBBB). Normal sinus rhythm is evidenced by a P wave associated with each QRS complex with a consistent PR interval.
Left atrial enlargement is evidenced by a P-wave duration ≥ 120 ms in lead II, a notched P wave in the limb leads with a peak duration ≥ 4 ms, and a terminal P-wave negativity in lead V1 with a duration ≥ 4 ms and a depth ≥ 1 mm.
An LBBB is illustrated by the QRS duration ≥ 120 ms, a dominant S wave in lead V1, broad monophasic R waves in the lateral leads (including I, aVL, V5, and V6), and R-wave peak times of > 60 ms in leads V5 and V6.
Further work-up revealed elevated left end-diastolic filling pressures, volume overload, and pulmonary edema consistent with diastolic heart failure. Given the unclear etiology of the LBBB, cardiac catheterization was performed. It revealed no significant coronary artery disease.
ANSWER
The correct interpretation of this ECG includes normal sinus rhythm with left atrial enlargement and a left bundle branch block (LBBB). Normal sinus rhythm is evidenced by a P wave associated with each QRS complex with a consistent PR interval.
Left atrial enlargement is evidenced by a P-wave duration ≥ 120 ms in lead II, a notched P wave in the limb leads with a peak duration ≥ 4 ms, and a terminal P-wave negativity in lead V1 with a duration ≥ 4 ms and a depth ≥ 1 mm.
An LBBB is illustrated by the QRS duration ≥ 120 ms, a dominant S wave in lead V1, broad monophasic R waves in the lateral leads (including I, aVL, V5, and V6), and R-wave peak times of > 60 ms in leads V5 and V6.
Further work-up revealed elevated left end-diastolic filling pressures, volume overload, and pulmonary edema consistent with diastolic heart failure. Given the unclear etiology of the LBBB, cardiac catheterization was performed. It revealed no significant coronary artery disease.
ANSWER
The correct interpretation of this ECG includes normal sinus rhythm with left atrial enlargement and a left bundle branch block (LBBB). Normal sinus rhythm is evidenced by a P wave associated with each QRS complex with a consistent PR interval.
Left atrial enlargement is evidenced by a P-wave duration ≥ 120 ms in lead II, a notched P wave in the limb leads with a peak duration ≥ 4 ms, and a terminal P-wave negativity in lead V1 with a duration ≥ 4 ms and a depth ≥ 1 mm.
An LBBB is illustrated by the QRS duration ≥ 120 ms, a dominant S wave in lead V1, broad monophasic R waves in the lateral leads (including I, aVL, V5, and V6), and R-wave peak times of > 60 ms in leads V5 and V6.
Further work-up revealed elevated left end-diastolic filling pressures, volume overload, and pulmonary edema consistent with diastolic heart failure. Given the unclear etiology of the LBBB, cardiac catheterization was performed. It revealed no significant coronary artery disease.
A 67-year-old man has a history of chronic dyspnea. He is a retired farmer who says he “never had time” to seek medical help for anything other than cuts or broken bones. In the past two months, he’s noticed that his dyspnea has progressively worsened. When questioned, he admits that his legs began swelling around that time as well. Two days ago, he awoke from sleep unable to catch his breath. This morning, while walking to his mailbox, he became profoundly short of breath. He sat down by the side of the road and called 911. When the ambulance arrived, he felt much better but agreed to be taken to the emergency department, since his wife is away and he’s home alone. When questioned by the paramedics, he denied having chest pain, palpitations, productive or nonproductive cough, polyuria, polydipsia, nausea, or vomiting. Medical history is positive for hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and hypertension. He has had several fractures in his right ankle and left femur, which are well healed. Surgical history is remarkable for a cholecystectomy and multiple laceration repairs on his arms and hands (also well healed). His current medications include one aspirin per day and “a handful” of calcium carbonate tablets. Although he was prescribed “several heart pills” for hypertension, he hasn’t taken them or refilled the prescriptions for at least five years. He is allergic to penicillin and sulfa. He denies recreational or homeopathic drug use. He has never smoked, and he drinks one or two shots of bourbon on weekends. Family history includes a father who died in a farming accident and a mother who died of cervical cancer at age 85. He has seven siblings, all of whom are alive and well. The review of systems is remarkable only for GERD. Physical exam reveals a well-developed, obese male with a height of 6 ft 4 in and a weight of 278 lb. Vital signs include a blood pressure of 184/98 mm Hg; pulse, 90 beats/min; and respiratory rate, 20 breaths/min-1. He is afebrile. The HEENT exam is remarkable for atrophic glossitis. The neck shows no evidence of thyromegaly, and there are no carotid bruits or jugular venous distention. The chest is remarkable for diffuse wheezing and crackles in all lung bases. The cardiac exam reveals a regular rate of 90 beats/min, with no evidence of murmurs, rubs, or gallops. The abdomen is obese. There is no evidence of ascites or masses. Evidence of 2+ pitting edema to the midcalf is present bilaterally. The neurologic exam is grossly intact, and the psychiatric exam reveals the patient to be alert and oriented, with a bright affect. The working diagnosis in the emergency department is acute or chronic heart failure. A chest x-ray reveals moderate-to-severe pulmonary edema, cardiomegaly, and small bilateral effusions. Pertinent laboratory data include a serum glucose of 200 mg/dL and a B-type natriuretic peptide level of 590 pg/mL. All other lab values are within normal limits. An ECG reveals the following: a ventricular rate of 93 beats/min; PR interval, 168 ms; QRS duration, 156 ms; QT/QTc interval, 430/534 ms; P axis, 52°; R axis, 9°; and T axis, 171°. What is your interpretation of this ECG?
Hair Loss at a Very Young Age
ANSWER
The correct answer is trichotillomania (choice “c”). See Discussion for more information.
Alopecia mucinosa (choice “a”) is a rare cause of focal hair loss that can occur in children. However, it usually presents with papules or plaques, unlike the smooth skin surface seen here.
Alopecia areata (choice “b”), common in children, typically entails complete hair loss in a given area—or, as hair regrows, with hairs of equal length. The uneven hairs seen in trichotillomania help a great deal in distinguishing it from alopecia areata.
Traction alopecia (choice “d”) is focal hair loss caused by chronic tension related to hairstyling. Most common in African-American women, and typically affecting the frontal periphery of the scalp, it is an unlikely explanation for hair loss in a 10-year-old boy.
DISCUSSION
Trichotillomania (TT) means, literally, “hair-pulling madness.” But in reality, there’s little actual plucking of hairs in this common condition. Instead, patients habitually manipulate hair by twirling and tugging, which weakens the shafts and follicles and renders them more susceptible to everyday wear and tear. In some cases, individual hairs speed through their growth phases and others break off in mid-shaft. All of this contributes to the classic “uneven” look of TT.
Patients with TT tend to be in the 4-to-17 age range, and most have issues with unresolved anxiety that manifest in part with manipulation of the hair. Officially considered an impulse control disorder, TT in most cases belongs to the psychiatrist’s domain.
In this case, it was enormously helpful to have corroboration from the patient and his mother regarding his role in creating and perpetuating the problem. Had that not been the case—or in the event of other doubts as to the correct diagnosis—biopsy could have been performed to rule out most of the other items in the differential, particularly alopecia areata.
Interestingly enough, studies have shown that the more sharply defined the area of hair loss, the more likely the patient is to admit his/her role in its creation. However, as is often the case with scientific research, contradictory findings have also been made.
TREATMENT
Treatment of TT is problematic, since no medications have proven to be completely helpful. Psychiatrists use a combination of medication, cognitive behavioral therapy, and other behavior modifications that are designed to overcome the habitual component of the problem. Most cases of TT resolve on their own, but in severe cases that persist for years, permanent hair loss can result.
In this case, there was enough insight and motivation on the part of the patient and his family to stop the offending behavior and allow the hair to regrow.
ANSWER
The correct answer is trichotillomania (choice “c”). See Discussion for more information.
Alopecia mucinosa (choice “a”) is a rare cause of focal hair loss that can occur in children. However, it usually presents with papules or plaques, unlike the smooth skin surface seen here.
Alopecia areata (choice “b”), common in children, typically entails complete hair loss in a given area—or, as hair regrows, with hairs of equal length. The uneven hairs seen in trichotillomania help a great deal in distinguishing it from alopecia areata.
Traction alopecia (choice “d”) is focal hair loss caused by chronic tension related to hairstyling. Most common in African-American women, and typically affecting the frontal periphery of the scalp, it is an unlikely explanation for hair loss in a 10-year-old boy.
DISCUSSION
Trichotillomania (TT) means, literally, “hair-pulling madness.” But in reality, there’s little actual plucking of hairs in this common condition. Instead, patients habitually manipulate hair by twirling and tugging, which weakens the shafts and follicles and renders them more susceptible to everyday wear and tear. In some cases, individual hairs speed through their growth phases and others break off in mid-shaft. All of this contributes to the classic “uneven” look of TT.
Patients with TT tend to be in the 4-to-17 age range, and most have issues with unresolved anxiety that manifest in part with manipulation of the hair. Officially considered an impulse control disorder, TT in most cases belongs to the psychiatrist’s domain.
In this case, it was enormously helpful to have corroboration from the patient and his mother regarding his role in creating and perpetuating the problem. Had that not been the case—or in the event of other doubts as to the correct diagnosis—biopsy could have been performed to rule out most of the other items in the differential, particularly alopecia areata.
Interestingly enough, studies have shown that the more sharply defined the area of hair loss, the more likely the patient is to admit his/her role in its creation. However, as is often the case with scientific research, contradictory findings have also been made.
TREATMENT
Treatment of TT is problematic, since no medications have proven to be completely helpful. Psychiatrists use a combination of medication, cognitive behavioral therapy, and other behavior modifications that are designed to overcome the habitual component of the problem. Most cases of TT resolve on their own, but in severe cases that persist for years, permanent hair loss can result.
In this case, there was enough insight and motivation on the part of the patient and his family to stop the offending behavior and allow the hair to regrow.
ANSWER
The correct answer is trichotillomania (choice “c”). See Discussion for more information.
Alopecia mucinosa (choice “a”) is a rare cause of focal hair loss that can occur in children. However, it usually presents with papules or plaques, unlike the smooth skin surface seen here.
Alopecia areata (choice “b”), common in children, typically entails complete hair loss in a given area—or, as hair regrows, with hairs of equal length. The uneven hairs seen in trichotillomania help a great deal in distinguishing it from alopecia areata.
Traction alopecia (choice “d”) is focal hair loss caused by chronic tension related to hairstyling. Most common in African-American women, and typically affecting the frontal periphery of the scalp, it is an unlikely explanation for hair loss in a 10-year-old boy.
DISCUSSION
Trichotillomania (TT) means, literally, “hair-pulling madness.” But in reality, there’s little actual plucking of hairs in this common condition. Instead, patients habitually manipulate hair by twirling and tugging, which weakens the shafts and follicles and renders them more susceptible to everyday wear and tear. In some cases, individual hairs speed through their growth phases and others break off in mid-shaft. All of this contributes to the classic “uneven” look of TT.
Patients with TT tend to be in the 4-to-17 age range, and most have issues with unresolved anxiety that manifest in part with manipulation of the hair. Officially considered an impulse control disorder, TT in most cases belongs to the psychiatrist’s domain.
In this case, it was enormously helpful to have corroboration from the patient and his mother regarding his role in creating and perpetuating the problem. Had that not been the case—or in the event of other doubts as to the correct diagnosis—biopsy could have been performed to rule out most of the other items in the differential, particularly alopecia areata.
Interestingly enough, studies have shown that the more sharply defined the area of hair loss, the more likely the patient is to admit his/her role in its creation. However, as is often the case with scientific research, contradictory findings have also been made.
TREATMENT
Treatment of TT is problematic, since no medications have proven to be completely helpful. Psychiatrists use a combination of medication, cognitive behavioral therapy, and other behavior modifications that are designed to overcome the habitual component of the problem. Most cases of TT resolve on their own, but in severe cases that persist for years, permanent hair loss can result.
In this case, there was enough insight and motivation on the part of the patient and his family to stop the offending behavior and allow the hair to regrow.
A 10-year-old boy is referred to dermatology with a four-month history of hair loss. The affected area of the vertex is now large enough to alarm his mother, who accompanies him to his appointment. The child’s primary care provider had diagnosed alopecia areata and prescribed triamcinolone 0.1% solution. But after a month of twice-daily application, even more hair has been lost. There is no family history of alopecia areata or other autoimmune disease. The child is otherwise healthy, although he is being treated by a psychiatrist for attention deficit disorder and chronic anxiety (with two medications whose names are unknown). The patient denies any symptoms associated with his hair loss, and his mother denies any skin changes in the affected area. However, she emphasizes that she has seen her son manipulating the area with his hand on several occasions, despite her attempts to make him stop. When pressed, the patient finally admits that throughout the day he twirls and tugs on his hair—although he denies actually pulling out any. On inspection, an 11 x 8–cm oval area of distinct and sharply demarcated hair loss is noted in the vertex scalp. Hairs of different lengths are noted in the central portion of the site; some have obviously been broken off, while others are longer, with thin, tapering ends. There is no disruption (eg, scaling, redness, edema) in the surface of the scalp, but the whole area is darker (brown) than the surrounding, uninvolved scalp. No other areas of hair loss are noted in the scalp or face. No nodes are palpable in the neck.
Growing Lesion Impedes Finger Flexion
ANSWER
The correct answer is implantation cyst (choice “b”). This type of cyst is typically caused by trauma (eg, a puncture wound), and its contents are in stark contrast to those of ganglion cysts (choice “a”), which are thick and clear.
Warts (choice “c”) are essentially an epidermal process, not subcutaneous. They almost always disrupt normal skin lines, which often curve around the wart—a finding that was missing in this case.
Acquired digital fibrokeratomas (choice “d”) are benign solid tumors frequently seen on fingers. However, they are more epidermal than intradermal and demonstrate a diagnostic feature called an epidermal collarette (missing in this case).
DISCUSSION
Sometimes called implantation dermoid cysts, these sacs have a well-defined white cyst wall and cheesy, often odoriferous contents. Although common on hands and fingers, they can occur in almost any location and as a result of many types of trauma.
This includes surgical trauma, which effectively implants surface adnexal tissue (eg, the sebaceous apparatus) where it can continue to produce and accumulate its cheesy contents over time. Patients often forget the trauma that caused the cyst, but it is still worth inquiring into.
Merely emptying the sac can confirm the diagnosis; however, this almost always results in recurrence. Fortunately, implantation cysts are usually easily removed with minimal risk to hand function.
As with almost any tissue removed from the body, the specimen needs to be sent for pathologic examination. In addition to the differential items already noted, a number of rare or unusual conditions can present in a similar fashion, including eccrine carcinoma and a variety of sarcomas.
This patient recovered from his surgery without complication. Pathologic examination confirmed the benign nature of the lesion.
ANSWER
The correct answer is implantation cyst (choice “b”). This type of cyst is typically caused by trauma (eg, a puncture wound), and its contents are in stark contrast to those of ganglion cysts (choice “a”), which are thick and clear.
Warts (choice “c”) are essentially an epidermal process, not subcutaneous. They almost always disrupt normal skin lines, which often curve around the wart—a finding that was missing in this case.
Acquired digital fibrokeratomas (choice “d”) are benign solid tumors frequently seen on fingers. However, they are more epidermal than intradermal and demonstrate a diagnostic feature called an epidermal collarette (missing in this case).
DISCUSSION
Sometimes called implantation dermoid cysts, these sacs have a well-defined white cyst wall and cheesy, often odoriferous contents. Although common on hands and fingers, they can occur in almost any location and as a result of many types of trauma.
This includes surgical trauma, which effectively implants surface adnexal tissue (eg, the sebaceous apparatus) where it can continue to produce and accumulate its cheesy contents over time. Patients often forget the trauma that caused the cyst, but it is still worth inquiring into.
Merely emptying the sac can confirm the diagnosis; however, this almost always results in recurrence. Fortunately, implantation cysts are usually easily removed with minimal risk to hand function.
As with almost any tissue removed from the body, the specimen needs to be sent for pathologic examination. In addition to the differential items already noted, a number of rare or unusual conditions can present in a similar fashion, including eccrine carcinoma and a variety of sarcomas.
This patient recovered from his surgery without complication. Pathologic examination confirmed the benign nature of the lesion.
ANSWER
The correct answer is implantation cyst (choice “b”). This type of cyst is typically caused by trauma (eg, a puncture wound), and its contents are in stark contrast to those of ganglion cysts (choice “a”), which are thick and clear.
Warts (choice “c”) are essentially an epidermal process, not subcutaneous. They almost always disrupt normal skin lines, which often curve around the wart—a finding that was missing in this case.
Acquired digital fibrokeratomas (choice “d”) are benign solid tumors frequently seen on fingers. However, they are more epidermal than intradermal and demonstrate a diagnostic feature called an epidermal collarette (missing in this case).
DISCUSSION
Sometimes called implantation dermoid cysts, these sacs have a well-defined white cyst wall and cheesy, often odoriferous contents. Although common on hands and fingers, they can occur in almost any location and as a result of many types of trauma.
This includes surgical trauma, which effectively implants surface adnexal tissue (eg, the sebaceous apparatus) where it can continue to produce and accumulate its cheesy contents over time. Patients often forget the trauma that caused the cyst, but it is still worth inquiring into.
Merely emptying the sac can confirm the diagnosis; however, this almost always results in recurrence. Fortunately, implantation cysts are usually easily removed with minimal risk to hand function.
As with almost any tissue removed from the body, the specimen needs to be sent for pathologic examination. In addition to the differential items already noted, a number of rare or unusual conditions can present in a similar fashion, including eccrine carcinoma and a variety of sarcomas.
This patient recovered from his surgery without complication. Pathologic examination confirmed the benign nature of the lesion.
For several years, a 45-year-old man has had an asymptomatic lesion on the volar aspect of his fourth finger. The lesion is growing and increasingly “in the way.” That, coupled with the patient’s concern about cancer or other serious disease, leads him to request referral to dermatology. There is no history of similar lesions anywhere on his body. Additional questioning reveals that several months prior to the lesion’s manifestation, the patient sustained a puncture wound to the same finger. Initially, the affected area was only a millimeter or two in size. X-rays ordered by his primary care provider did not indicate any bony abnormality, nor did they shed any light on the lesion itself. An impressive 2.6 cm in diameter, the lesion is prominent in vertical elevation as well. Motor and sensory function are found to be intact, although the bulk of the lesion prohibits full flexion of the finger. The lesion is opaque to attempted transillumination. No surface changes are apparent in the overlying skin. Skin lines are intact and parallel. The lesion is quite firm but compressible. The decision is made to excise the lesion, employing a digital block and tourniquet. A football-shaped ellipse of skin with 50° angles on the ends is removed from the surface, revealing a glistening white, smooth mass that comes out intact, with very little blunt dissection. Motor function is again assessed and found to be intact. The large angles in the ends of the ellipse allow the wound edges to be pulled together with interrupted vertical mattress sutures and no leftover redundant skin. The lesion is submitted intact for pathologic examination.
Neck Pain With No Palpable Tenderness
ANSWER
The image shows an acute fracture at the base of the odontoid with evidence of posterior displacement of the fracture fragment. Such fractures are typically unstable.
In addition, there is evidence of a fracture and subluxation at the C4/C5 level. However, given the degree of sclerosis and chronic changes present, this finding is likely an old one.
The patient was maintained in a collar on bedrest. Subsequently, he underwent odontoid pinning to stabilize the fractures.
ANSWER
The image shows an acute fracture at the base of the odontoid with evidence of posterior displacement of the fracture fragment. Such fractures are typically unstable.
In addition, there is evidence of a fracture and subluxation at the C4/C5 level. However, given the degree of sclerosis and chronic changes present, this finding is likely an old one.
The patient was maintained in a collar on bedrest. Subsequently, he underwent odontoid pinning to stabilize the fractures.
ANSWER
The image shows an acute fracture at the base of the odontoid with evidence of posterior displacement of the fracture fragment. Such fractures are typically unstable.
In addition, there is evidence of a fracture and subluxation at the C4/C5 level. However, given the degree of sclerosis and chronic changes present, this finding is likely an old one.
The patient was maintained in a collar on bedrest. Subsequently, he underwent odontoid pinning to stabilize the fractures.
A 65-year-old man presents with neck pain following a fall. Earlier this evening, he says, he fell off his porch (approximately four feet in height) and hit the top/front of his head on the ground. He denies any loss of consciousness, adding that he only came in for evaluation at the urging of his family. The patient denies any extremity weakness or paresthesias. He also denies any significant medical history, although his sister, who has accompanied him, states that he drinks alcohol “regularly and heavily.” Physical examination reveals a man who appears much older than his stated age and is uncomfortable, but not in obvious distress. His vital signs are normal. He is currently wearing a hard cervical collar. There is no palpable tenderness posteriorly along his cervical spine. He is able to move all of his extremities well. His strength is good, and his sensation is intact. A lateral radiograph of the patient’s cervical spine is shown. What is your impression?
Is Lingering “Flu” Responsible for Lethargy?
ANSWER
This ECG shows a junctional rhythm with a rate of 47 beats/min and an incomplete right bundle branch block (RBBB). The QRS complexes are narrow, indicating conduction originating at or above the atrioventricular (AV) node.
With the absence of a P wave for every QRS complex, the origin of each beat occurs at the level of the AV node, with depolarization of the ventricles via the normal conduction pathway. Intrinsic automaticity of the AV node results in a rate of 40 to 60 beats/min. There may be retrograde conduction from the AV node into the atria; however, it is not apparent in this ECG.
An incomplete RBBB is evidenced by a QRS complex with a duration > 100 ms and ≤ 120 ms with a terminal R wave (eg, rsR’) in lead V1 and a slurred S wave in leads I and V6 (more common with complete RBBB).
The presence of new-onset junctional rhythm with an incomplete RBBB is suspicious for conduction system disease. Given her symptomatic bradycardia, the patient underwent implantation of a dual-chamber permanent pacemaker. She has since returned to her normal activities.
Of note: Careful examination of the baseline in this tracing raises suspicion for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, according to her primary care provider, this patient had had no previous episodes of AF. Intracardiac electrograms taken during her pacemaker implantation ruled out this diagnosis.
ANSWER
This ECG shows a junctional rhythm with a rate of 47 beats/min and an incomplete right bundle branch block (RBBB). The QRS complexes are narrow, indicating conduction originating at or above the atrioventricular (AV) node.
With the absence of a P wave for every QRS complex, the origin of each beat occurs at the level of the AV node, with depolarization of the ventricles via the normal conduction pathway. Intrinsic automaticity of the AV node results in a rate of 40 to 60 beats/min. There may be retrograde conduction from the AV node into the atria; however, it is not apparent in this ECG.
An incomplete RBBB is evidenced by a QRS complex with a duration > 100 ms and ≤ 120 ms with a terminal R wave (eg, rsR’) in lead V1 and a slurred S wave in leads I and V6 (more common with complete RBBB).
The presence of new-onset junctional rhythm with an incomplete RBBB is suspicious for conduction system disease. Given her symptomatic bradycardia, the patient underwent implantation of a dual-chamber permanent pacemaker. She has since returned to her normal activities.
Of note: Careful examination of the baseline in this tracing raises suspicion for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, according to her primary care provider, this patient had had no previous episodes of AF. Intracardiac electrograms taken during her pacemaker implantation ruled out this diagnosis.
ANSWER
This ECG shows a junctional rhythm with a rate of 47 beats/min and an incomplete right bundle branch block (RBBB). The QRS complexes are narrow, indicating conduction originating at or above the atrioventricular (AV) node.
With the absence of a P wave for every QRS complex, the origin of each beat occurs at the level of the AV node, with depolarization of the ventricles via the normal conduction pathway. Intrinsic automaticity of the AV node results in a rate of 40 to 60 beats/min. There may be retrograde conduction from the AV node into the atria; however, it is not apparent in this ECG.
An incomplete RBBB is evidenced by a QRS complex with a duration > 100 ms and ≤ 120 ms with a terminal R wave (eg, rsR’) in lead V1 and a slurred S wave in leads I and V6 (more common with complete RBBB).
The presence of new-onset junctional rhythm with an incomplete RBBB is suspicious for conduction system disease. Given her symptomatic bradycardia, the patient underwent implantation of a dual-chamber permanent pacemaker. She has since returned to her normal activities.
Of note: Careful examination of the baseline in this tracing raises suspicion for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, according to her primary care provider, this patient had had no previous episodes of AF. Intracardiac electrograms taken during her pacemaker implantation ruled out this diagnosis.
Accompanied by her daughter, whom she is visiting from out of town, a 72-year-old woman presents with a two-week history of lethargy. She says she had “the flu” three weeks ago and just can’t seem to recover from it. According to her daughter, she doesn’t appear ill but seems to tire very easily after simple tasks such as walking from her bedroom to the kitchen. The patient denies fever, chills, orthopnea, dyspnea, and cough. There have been no episodes of near-syncope or syncope. She repeatedly states that she is “just so tired.” Prior to the onset of her flulike symptoms, she was very active in her retirement community, dancing, gardening, and going on sponsored trips to a local casino without difficulty. She says she wouldn’t even attempt those activities in her current state, as any activity immediately exhausts her. Medical history is remarkable for hypertension, hypothyroidism, osteoarthritis, and diabetes. Surgical history is remarkable for a cholecystectomy, abdominal hysterectomy, and removal of several lipomas from her upper extremities. Her current medications include aspirin, hydrochlorothiazide, lisinopril, metformin, and levothyroxine. She is allergic to penicillin and sulfa, both of which cause hives and flushing. Social history reveals that she is a retired junior high school librarian, the mother of three living children, and a widow. She is a smoker, with a one-pack-per-day history from age 14 until her husband died four years ago. She quit at that time but has recently started again, smoking half a pack per day (but “only” when she goes to the casino). She does not use alcohol or recreational drugs. The review of systems is positive for corrective lenses and symptoms suggestive of a urinary tract infection. On physical exam, her blood pressure is 138/92 mm Hg; pulse, 50 beats/min; respiratory rate, 16 breaths/min-1; and temperature, 98.4°F. Her weight is 224 lb, and her height is 62 in. She walks with the assistance of a cane and appears tired and apprehensive. Pertinent physical findings include bilateral cataracts, clear lung fields, and a soft, early systolic murmur at the left lower sternal border. She has two well-healed scars on her abdomen and multiple well-healed scars on both upper extremities. Her hands show evidence of osteoarthritis, and she has limited range of motion but no pain in her right hip. The neurologic exam is grossly intact. Laboratory tests and an ECG are performed. The ECG findings include a ventricular rate of 47 beats/min; PR interval, not measured; QRS duration, 120 ms; QT/QTc interval, 454/401 ms; P axis, not measured; R axis, 171°; and T axis, 51°. What is your interpretation of this ECG—and does it provide an explanation for the patient’s recent lethargy?
Construction Worker Falls From Scaffolding
A 45-year-old construction worker is brought to your facility for evaluation following a fall. He was at a job site, standing on scaffolding approximately 20 feet above the ground, when he accidentally fell. He does not remember for sure, but he thinks he landed on his face. He did briefly lose consciousness. He is complaining of right-side facial pain and right wrist pain. His medical history is unremarkable. The physical exam reveals stable vital signs. The patient appears somewhat uncomfortable but is in no obvious distress. There is a moderate amount of periorbital soft-tissue swelling around his right eye, with moderate associated tenderness. Pupils are equal and react well bilaterally. Examination of the right wrist shows a moderate amount of soft-tissue swelling. The patient is unable to flex or extend his wrist due to pain. Good pulses and capillary refill of the nail beds are noted. There is also moderate tenderness along the base of the first metacarpal. Radiograph of the right wrist is shown. What is your impression?
Now Insured, Patient Wants to “Get Checked Out”
ANSWER
There are three findings on this ECG: unusual P waves consistent with a possible ectopic atrial rhythm, a prolonged QT interval, and T-wave abnormalities in the lateral leads.
Note that the P waves are negative in leads I and II, as well as in all chest leads. This is highly suggestive of an ectopic atrial rhythm originating low in the atria, conducting retrograde into the atria, and overriding the sinoatrial node. Limb lead reversal would result in negative P waves in lead I, but not in other leads.
A prolonged QT interval is determined by consulting any of the standard charts that correlate maximum heart rates with QT intervals and gender. In men, the QT interval is considered “prolonged” when it exceeds 440 ms, unless the heart rate is extremely slow.
Finally, T-wave inversions are present in the lateral leads (V5, V6). Although this may be an indication of lateral ischemia, there is no clinical correlation in this patient.
ANSWER
There are three findings on this ECG: unusual P waves consistent with a possible ectopic atrial rhythm, a prolonged QT interval, and T-wave abnormalities in the lateral leads.
Note that the P waves are negative in leads I and II, as well as in all chest leads. This is highly suggestive of an ectopic atrial rhythm originating low in the atria, conducting retrograde into the atria, and overriding the sinoatrial node. Limb lead reversal would result in negative P waves in lead I, but not in other leads.
A prolonged QT interval is determined by consulting any of the standard charts that correlate maximum heart rates with QT intervals and gender. In men, the QT interval is considered “prolonged” when it exceeds 440 ms, unless the heart rate is extremely slow.
Finally, T-wave inversions are present in the lateral leads (V5, V6). Although this may be an indication of lateral ischemia, there is no clinical correlation in this patient.
ANSWER
There are three findings on this ECG: unusual P waves consistent with a possible ectopic atrial rhythm, a prolonged QT interval, and T-wave abnormalities in the lateral leads.
Note that the P waves are negative in leads I and II, as well as in all chest leads. This is highly suggestive of an ectopic atrial rhythm originating low in the atria, conducting retrograde into the atria, and overriding the sinoatrial node. Limb lead reversal would result in negative P waves in lead I, but not in other leads.
A prolonged QT interval is determined by consulting any of the standard charts that correlate maximum heart rates with QT intervals and gender. In men, the QT interval is considered “prolonged” when it exceeds 440 ms, unless the heart rate is extremely slow.
Finally, T-wave inversions are present in the lateral leads (V5, V6). Although this may be an indication of lateral ischemia, there is no clinical correlation in this patient.
A 37-year-old man presents to your office to establish care. After being unemployed for two years, he recently obtained a position with a local manufacturing company and, as a result, has health benefits. He wants to “get checked out.” He has not seen a health care provider since having his tonsils removed at age 14. He says he is rarely ill, aside from an occasional cold. Besides the tonsillectomy, medical history is positive for a right clavicular fracture at age 6 and a left inguinal hernia repair at age 9. He had chickenpox and recalls that his immunizations were up to date until he graduated high school. His only medication is ibuprofen as needed for aches and pains. He has no known drug allergies. He uses two herbal supplements, fenugreek seed and horny goat weed, daily. He admits to recreational marijuana use. Family history is remarkable for coronary artery disease (father), diabetes (mother), and depression (sister). He consumes one six-pack of beer weekly and has smoked one pack of cigarettes per day for the past 23 years. He isn’t interested in quitting smoking. The patient is divorced, without children. He has been collecting unemployment since his last position was terminated due to budget constraints. A 20-point comprehensive review of systems is negative, with the exception of occasional palpitations and a productive morning smoker’s cough that quickly resolves. He states he’s “as healthy as a horse.” The physical exam reveals a thin, healthy-appearing middle-aged male. He is 72 in tall and weighs 167 lb. His blood pressure is 108/66 mm Hg; pulse, 70 beats/min and regular; respiratory rate, 14 breaths/min-1; and temperature, 98.4°F. The head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat (HEENT) exam is remarkable for poor dentition, with multiple caries readily visible. The tonsils are absent. Coarse expiratory crackles are present in both bases and clear with vigorous coughing. The abdominal exam is positive for a well-healed scar in the left inguinal crease. The remainder of the physical exam is normal. As part of a new patient visit, a chest x-ray and ECG are obtained. The ECG shows the following: a ventricular rate of 69 beats/min; PR interval, 178 ms; QRS duration, 90ms; QT/QTc interval, 442/473 ms; P axis, 231°; R axis, 84°; and T axis, 93°. What is your interpretation of this ECG?
A Purplish Rash on the Instep
ANSWER
The correct answer is lichen planus (choice “d”), an inflammatory condition marked by pathognomic histologic changes such as those described. Hardly on the tip of most primary care providers’ tongues, lichen planus is nonetheless quite commonly occuring.
Tinea pedis (choice “a”) certainly belongs in the differential, but it would be unusual in a woman of this age. The biopsy effectively ruled it out, as it did psoriasis (choice “b”) and contact dermatitis (choice “c”).
DISCUSSION
Lichen planus (LP) is the prototypical lichenoid interface dermatitis; an inflammatory infiltrate erases the normally well-defined dermoepidermal junction, replacing it with a jagged “sawtooth” band of lymphocytes. In the process, the cells it kills off (keratinocytes) collect at this interface and are incorporated as necrotic keratinocytes into the papillary dermis.
Classically, the recognition of LP is taught with “The Ps.” LP is said to be:
• Papular
• Planar
• Purple
• Polygonal
• Pruritic
• Plaquish
• Penile
• Puzzling
The word “puzzling” may sound nebulous, but it is actually quite useful for dermatology providers. It comes into play whenever a condition stumps us—as in, “What in the world is this?” This puzzlement causes us to at least consider LP.
LP is often papular, and these papules often have flat (planar) tops. The purple color is more striking in lighter-skinned patients. (Almost all inflammatory conditions are more difficult to diagnose in those with darker skin.) More typically, LP lesions are multi-angular or polygonal, often plaquish, and almost invariably pruritic.
LP is common on the legs and/or trunk, favoring the sacral area. It can affect the scalp (being in the differential for hair loss), can cause nail dystrophy, and is relatively common in the mouth, where it presents as a lacy, reticular, slightly erosive process, usually affecting the buccal mucosae. It may be found on the penis, where it is usually confined to the distal shaft and proximal coronal areas.
Like many otherwise benign conditions, LP can present with bullae. In anterior tibial areas, especially on darker-skinned persons, it can be remarkably hypertrophic.
The cause is usually unknown, although certain drugs—especially the antimalarials, gold salts, and penicillamine—have been known to cause LP-like eruptions. It’s been my observation that flares of LP are prompted by stress (certainly present in this patient’s case). LP may have a connection to hepatitis, although no convincing connection has been established.
TREATMENT
This patient’s condition was treated with topical class I corticosteroid ointment (halobetasol). For her, having a certain diagnosis was almost as important as successful treatment.
ANSWER
The correct answer is lichen planus (choice “d”), an inflammatory condition marked by pathognomic histologic changes such as those described. Hardly on the tip of most primary care providers’ tongues, lichen planus is nonetheless quite commonly occuring.
Tinea pedis (choice “a”) certainly belongs in the differential, but it would be unusual in a woman of this age. The biopsy effectively ruled it out, as it did psoriasis (choice “b”) and contact dermatitis (choice “c”).
DISCUSSION
Lichen planus (LP) is the prototypical lichenoid interface dermatitis; an inflammatory infiltrate erases the normally well-defined dermoepidermal junction, replacing it with a jagged “sawtooth” band of lymphocytes. In the process, the cells it kills off (keratinocytes) collect at this interface and are incorporated as necrotic keratinocytes into the papillary dermis.
Classically, the recognition of LP is taught with “The Ps.” LP is said to be:
• Papular
• Planar
• Purple
• Polygonal
• Pruritic
• Plaquish
• Penile
• Puzzling
The word “puzzling” may sound nebulous, but it is actually quite useful for dermatology providers. It comes into play whenever a condition stumps us—as in, “What in the world is this?” This puzzlement causes us to at least consider LP.
LP is often papular, and these papules often have flat (planar) tops. The purple color is more striking in lighter-skinned patients. (Almost all inflammatory conditions are more difficult to diagnose in those with darker skin.) More typically, LP lesions are multi-angular or polygonal, often plaquish, and almost invariably pruritic.
LP is common on the legs and/or trunk, favoring the sacral area. It can affect the scalp (being in the differential for hair loss), can cause nail dystrophy, and is relatively common in the mouth, where it presents as a lacy, reticular, slightly erosive process, usually affecting the buccal mucosae. It may be found on the penis, where it is usually confined to the distal shaft and proximal coronal areas.
Like many otherwise benign conditions, LP can present with bullae. In anterior tibial areas, especially on darker-skinned persons, it can be remarkably hypertrophic.
The cause is usually unknown, although certain drugs—especially the antimalarials, gold salts, and penicillamine—have been known to cause LP-like eruptions. It’s been my observation that flares of LP are prompted by stress (certainly present in this patient’s case). LP may have a connection to hepatitis, although no convincing connection has been established.
TREATMENT
This patient’s condition was treated with topical class I corticosteroid ointment (halobetasol). For her, having a certain diagnosis was almost as important as successful treatment.
ANSWER
The correct answer is lichen planus (choice “d”), an inflammatory condition marked by pathognomic histologic changes such as those described. Hardly on the tip of most primary care providers’ tongues, lichen planus is nonetheless quite commonly occuring.
Tinea pedis (choice “a”) certainly belongs in the differential, but it would be unusual in a woman of this age. The biopsy effectively ruled it out, as it did psoriasis (choice “b”) and contact dermatitis (choice “c”).
DISCUSSION
Lichen planus (LP) is the prototypical lichenoid interface dermatitis; an inflammatory infiltrate erases the normally well-defined dermoepidermal junction, replacing it with a jagged “sawtooth” band of lymphocytes. In the process, the cells it kills off (keratinocytes) collect at this interface and are incorporated as necrotic keratinocytes into the papillary dermis.
Classically, the recognition of LP is taught with “The Ps.” LP is said to be:
• Papular
• Planar
• Purple
• Polygonal
• Pruritic
• Plaquish
• Penile
• Puzzling
The word “puzzling” may sound nebulous, but it is actually quite useful for dermatology providers. It comes into play whenever a condition stumps us—as in, “What in the world is this?” This puzzlement causes us to at least consider LP.
LP is often papular, and these papules often have flat (planar) tops. The purple color is more striking in lighter-skinned patients. (Almost all inflammatory conditions are more difficult to diagnose in those with darker skin.) More typically, LP lesions are multi-angular or polygonal, often plaquish, and almost invariably pruritic.
LP is common on the legs and/or trunk, favoring the sacral area. It can affect the scalp (being in the differential for hair loss), can cause nail dystrophy, and is relatively common in the mouth, where it presents as a lacy, reticular, slightly erosive process, usually affecting the buccal mucosae. It may be found on the penis, where it is usually confined to the distal shaft and proximal coronal areas.
Like many otherwise benign conditions, LP can present with bullae. In anterior tibial areas, especially on darker-skinned persons, it can be remarkably hypertrophic.
The cause is usually unknown, although certain drugs—especially the antimalarials, gold salts, and penicillamine—have been known to cause LP-like eruptions. It’s been my observation that flares of LP are prompted by stress (certainly present in this patient’s case). LP may have a connection to hepatitis, although no convincing connection has been established.
TREATMENT
This patient’s condition was treated with topical class I corticosteroid ointment (halobetasol). For her, having a certain diagnosis was almost as important as successful treatment.
Several months ago, an itchy rash appeared on the foot of this 61-year-old African-American woman. She tried using a variety of OTC and prescription products, including tolnaftate cream, hydrocortisone 1% cream, and triamcinolone cream, but the rash persisted. She reports that the triamcinolone cream did relieve the itching for a few minutes after application, but the symptoms always returned. The rash has gradually grown. The patient, a retired schoolteacher, denies any other skin problems. She does have several relatively minor health problems, including hypertension (well controlled with metoprolol) and mild reactive airway disease (related to a 20-year history of smoking). The rash manifested around the time she was forced to retire in an unforeseen downsizing effort by her school district. As a result, she lost her health care coverage and could not afford private insurance for herself and her husband (neither of whom are old enough to qualify for Medicare). The rash, which covers a roughly 12 × 8–cm area, begins on her left instep and spills onto the lower ankle. It is quite dark, as would be expected in a person with type V skin, but there is a slightly purplish tinge to it. The surface of the affected area is a bit shiny and atrophic, and the margins are well defined and annular. There is almost no scaling, and the rest of the skin on her feet and legs is well within normal limits. A 4-mm punch biopsy is performed on the lesion. The pathology report shows obliteration of the dermoepidermal junction by a bandlike lymphocytic infiltrate in the papillary dermis, associated with vacuolar changes and the accumulation of necrotic keratinocytes in the basal layer.
Man Has “a Couple of Blocks Somewhere”
ANSWER
The correct interpretation includes sinus bradycardia with first-degree block, a single premature atrial beat with aberrancy, right bundle branch block, left anterior fascicular block (bifascicular block), left ventricular hypertrophy, and T-wave inversions in the inferior leads.
In sinus bradycardia, there is a P wave for every QRS complex with a rate less than 60 beats/min. First-degree block is evidenced by a PR interval ≥ 200 ms.
A single premature atrial contraction is seen as the ninth beat on the ECG. Aberrancy refers to the appearance of the QRS complex; the impulse arises above the AV node but propagates down the AV node and His-Purkinje system to the ventricles before the conduction system is fully repolarized. This results in a QRS complex with intrinsic conduction similar to a normally conducted beat, which then becomes wide and uncharacteristic. Additionally, it resets the sinus node, resulting in a pause before the next normally conducted P wave.
A right bundle branch block is evidenced by the presence of normal conduction with a QRS duration > 120 ms, a terminal R wave in lead V1 (R, rR’, rsR’, or qR), and slurred S waves in leads I and V6.
The presence of left anterior fascicular block is confirmed by the left-axis deviation (–59° in this ECG), a qR complex in leads I and aVL, and an rS pattern in leads II, III, and aVF. The presence of both a right bundle and left anterior fascicular block constitutes bifascicular block. (This is a conduction problem and does not refer to blockage in the arteries, as the patient believed!)
Criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy are met when the sum of the S wave in V1 and the R wave in either V5 or V6 is ≥ 35 mm and the R wave in aVL is ≥ 11 mm.
Two other things to note in this ECG are the presence of T-wave inversions in the inferior leads (II, III, aVF) which are of unclear reason; and the presence of biphasic P waves that do not meet criteria for either right or left atrial hypertrophy.
ANSWER
The correct interpretation includes sinus bradycardia with first-degree block, a single premature atrial beat with aberrancy, right bundle branch block, left anterior fascicular block (bifascicular block), left ventricular hypertrophy, and T-wave inversions in the inferior leads.
In sinus bradycardia, there is a P wave for every QRS complex with a rate less than 60 beats/min. First-degree block is evidenced by a PR interval ≥ 200 ms.
A single premature atrial contraction is seen as the ninth beat on the ECG. Aberrancy refers to the appearance of the QRS complex; the impulse arises above the AV node but propagates down the AV node and His-Purkinje system to the ventricles before the conduction system is fully repolarized. This results in a QRS complex with intrinsic conduction similar to a normally conducted beat, which then becomes wide and uncharacteristic. Additionally, it resets the sinus node, resulting in a pause before the next normally conducted P wave.
A right bundle branch block is evidenced by the presence of normal conduction with a QRS duration > 120 ms, a terminal R wave in lead V1 (R, rR’, rsR’, or qR), and slurred S waves in leads I and V6.
The presence of left anterior fascicular block is confirmed by the left-axis deviation (–59° in this ECG), a qR complex in leads I and aVL, and an rS pattern in leads II, III, and aVF. The presence of both a right bundle and left anterior fascicular block constitutes bifascicular block. (This is a conduction problem and does not refer to blockage in the arteries, as the patient believed!)
Criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy are met when the sum of the S wave in V1 and the R wave in either V5 or V6 is ≥ 35 mm and the R wave in aVL is ≥ 11 mm.
Two other things to note in this ECG are the presence of T-wave inversions in the inferior leads (II, III, aVF) which are of unclear reason; and the presence of biphasic P waves that do not meet criteria for either right or left atrial hypertrophy.
ANSWER
The correct interpretation includes sinus bradycardia with first-degree block, a single premature atrial beat with aberrancy, right bundle branch block, left anterior fascicular block (bifascicular block), left ventricular hypertrophy, and T-wave inversions in the inferior leads.
In sinus bradycardia, there is a P wave for every QRS complex with a rate less than 60 beats/min. First-degree block is evidenced by a PR interval ≥ 200 ms.
A single premature atrial contraction is seen as the ninth beat on the ECG. Aberrancy refers to the appearance of the QRS complex; the impulse arises above the AV node but propagates down the AV node and His-Purkinje system to the ventricles before the conduction system is fully repolarized. This results in a QRS complex with intrinsic conduction similar to a normally conducted beat, which then becomes wide and uncharacteristic. Additionally, it resets the sinus node, resulting in a pause before the next normally conducted P wave.
A right bundle branch block is evidenced by the presence of normal conduction with a QRS duration > 120 ms, a terminal R wave in lead V1 (R, rR’, rsR’, or qR), and slurred S waves in leads I and V6.
The presence of left anterior fascicular block is confirmed by the left-axis deviation (–59° in this ECG), a qR complex in leads I and aVL, and an rS pattern in leads II, III, and aVF. The presence of both a right bundle and left anterior fascicular block constitutes bifascicular block. (This is a conduction problem and does not refer to blockage in the arteries, as the patient believed!)
Criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy are met when the sum of the S wave in V1 and the R wave in either V5 or V6 is ≥ 35 mm and the R wave in aVL is ≥ 11 mm.
Two other things to note in this ECG are the presence of T-wave inversions in the inferior leads (II, III, aVF) which are of unclear reason; and the presence of biphasic P waves that do not meet criteria for either right or left atrial hypertrophy.
A 69-year-old man presents for a routine appointment. His cardiac history is remarkable for systemic hypertension, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, pulmonary hypertension, and dyspnea on exertion. He says a previous provider told him his ECG had “a couple of blocks,” which he believes are “somewhere in the arteries.” He regularly feels lightheaded if he rises from a lying or sitting position too quickly, but he has never lost consciousness. He denies any history of chest pain or symptoms suggestive of angina. Reviewing his prior cardiac workup, you find an echocardiogram that shows moderate left ventricular enlargement with a left ventricular ejection fraction estimated at 35% to 40%; a severely enlarged left atrium; and mild thickening of the mitral leaflets as well as mild mitral regurgitation. A report from an old ECG (conducted at an outside institution) reveals sinus bradycardia, bifascicular block, and left ventricular hypertrophy. Cardiac catheterization performed two years ago showed diffuse disease with no lesions > 30%. Pulmonary function testing showed mild airflow obstruction, no restrictive component, and mildly decreased diffusing capacity. Medical history is positive for two benign colonic polyps that were removed during his last colonoscopy and a remote history of malaria while traveling in Africa 10 years ago. He also has a history of depression, which has been well controlled by medication. His list of medications includes carvedilol, fluoxetine, melatonin, and lisinopril. He is allergic to atenolol and metoprolol. His family history is remarkable for type 1 diabetes (mother). He is a retired baggage handler for a major airline at a nearby international airport. Since high school, he has smoked between one-half and one pack of cigarettes per day. He typically consumes a 12-pack of beer on the weekends. The review of systems is remarkable for corrective lenses, occasional headaches, and dyspnea. The patient denies any other symptoms. Physical examination reveals a blood pressure of 138/80 mm Hg; pulse, 64 beats/min; respiratory rate, 14 breaths/min-1; and O2 saturation, 97%. His height is 188 cm; weight, 107 kg; and BMI, 30. The lungs are clear to auscultation and percussion. The cardiac exam reveals no jugular venous distention, a normal rate and rhythm with occasional skipped beats, and a soft, grade II/VI blowing systolic murmur best heard at the left lower sternal border. The point of maximum impulse is palpable in the left anterior axillary line. The abdomen is soft and nontender, with no organomegaly. The genitourinary exam is normal. Peripheral pulses are 2+ bilaterally in both upper and lower extremities. There is no peripheral edema, and the neurologic exam is grossly intact. The patient is sent for a chest x-ray and an ECG. The latter reveals the following: a ventricular rate of 59 beats/min; PR interval, 284 ms; QRS duration, 130 ms; QT/QTc interval, 472/467 ms; P axis, 70°; R axis, –59°; and T axis, –29°. What is your interpretation of this ECG?
Woman Assaulted on Street
The chest radiograph demonstrates a massive amount of soft tissue and subcutaneous emphysema extending from the neck down through the chest and into the lower chest/upper abdomen. In addition, there are several fractured posterior ribs bilaterally. No large pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum is noted.
Because of the extent and mechanism of injury, CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis had already been ordered. Arrangements were also made for the patient to be admitted to the ICU for closer observation.
The chest radiograph demonstrates a massive amount of soft tissue and subcutaneous emphysema extending from the neck down through the chest and into the lower chest/upper abdomen. In addition, there are several fractured posterior ribs bilaterally. No large pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum is noted.
Because of the extent and mechanism of injury, CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis had already been ordered. Arrangements were also made for the patient to be admitted to the ICU for closer observation.
The chest radiograph demonstrates a massive amount of soft tissue and subcutaneous emphysema extending from the neck down through the chest and into the lower chest/upper abdomen. In addition, there are several fractured posterior ribs bilaterally. No large pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum is noted.
Because of the extent and mechanism of injury, CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis had already been ordered. Arrangements were also made for the patient to be admitted to the ICU for closer observation.
A 40-year-old woman is brought in by EMS for evaluation of injuries secondary to being assaulted. She was out walking late last night when she was approached by two men who pushed her to the ground and began punching and kicking her repeatedly on her face, chest, and back. She is primarily complaining of chest wall and back pain. Her medical history is significant for hypertension, diet-controlled diabetes, and “some sort of heart problem” for which she takes medication. Surgical history is significant for hysterectomy, cholecystectomy, and appendectomy. She smokes more than a pack of cigarettes per day and consumes at least a six-pack of beer daily. Initial exam shows an anxious female who appears somewhat uncomfortable but is in no obvious distress. Her vital signs are as follows: blood pressure, 130/88 mm Hg; pulse, 120 beats/min; respiratory rate, 22 breaths/min; and O2 saturation, 100% on room air. Physical exam reveals extensive facial/periorbital swelling, as well as swelling in the neck. Some splinting is noted. There is extensive crepitus noted within the soft tissue of the face, neck, and chest wall. Also, there is moderate tenderness bilaterally over the ribs. Chest radiograph is obtained (shown). What is your impression?