Video

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Even when you know a patient’s serology and hear their symptoms and think you have a bead on their rheumatic disease, you might not. It’s vital to check the skin in patients with rheumatic disease to be sure the right disease is being treated and that they don’t actually have a more severe condition that might progress suddenly if left unchecked, said Alisa Femia, MD, assistant professor of dermatology at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.

In a session filled with pearls for rheumatologists on what to look for on their patients’ skin to help guide diagnosis and treatment, she told the story of a woman whom a rheumatologist colleague had correctly diagnosed with dermatomyositis. She was started on prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil, but her skin disease did not clear.

After examining her skin, Dr. Femia became immediately concerned.

“Despite prednisone, despite mycophenolate, here not only does she have Gottron’s papules, but she has erosions within her Gottron’s papules,” Dr. Femia said. The woman also had erosions within papules on her palms.

These were telltale signs of MDA5-associated dermatomyositis, which studies have found to be linked with interstitial lung disease (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Jul;65[1]:25-34). Under her care, these patients ideally undergo lung monitoring every 3 months, Dr. Femia said.

“That is a form of dermatomyositis that you cannot miss,” she said.

The effects of discoid lupus are another reason to take special care in skin examination. Once the disease, which involves a scaling of the skin, is obvious, there can be permanent aesthetic effects that could have been avoided with earlier detection and treatment, Dr. Femia said.

Clinicians should also be on the lookout for volume loss, or contour change, in discoid lupus patients, because that’s a sign of lupus panniculitis, which involves deeper lesions mainly to fatty areas such as the cheeks or thighs. The disease can progress fast, with sudden, massive loss of body volume, so therapy should be escalated quickly, she said.

“We want to treat these patients aggressively in order to avoid this.”

SOURCE: Femia A. CCR 2018.

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Even when you know a patient’s serology and hear their symptoms and think you have a bead on their rheumatic disease, you might not. It’s vital to check the skin in patients with rheumatic disease to be sure the right disease is being treated and that they don’t actually have a more severe condition that might progress suddenly if left unchecked, said Alisa Femia, MD, assistant professor of dermatology at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.

In a session filled with pearls for rheumatologists on what to look for on their patients’ skin to help guide diagnosis and treatment, she told the story of a woman whom a rheumatologist colleague had correctly diagnosed with dermatomyositis. She was started on prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil, but her skin disease did not clear.

After examining her skin, Dr. Femia became immediately concerned.

“Despite prednisone, despite mycophenolate, here not only does she have Gottron’s papules, but she has erosions within her Gottron’s papules,” Dr. Femia said. The woman also had erosions within papules on her palms.

These were telltale signs of MDA5-associated dermatomyositis, which studies have found to be linked with interstitial lung disease (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Jul;65[1]:25-34). Under her care, these patients ideally undergo lung monitoring every 3 months, Dr. Femia said.

“That is a form of dermatomyositis that you cannot miss,” she said.

The effects of discoid lupus are another reason to take special care in skin examination. Once the disease, which involves a scaling of the skin, is obvious, there can be permanent aesthetic effects that could have been avoided with earlier detection and treatment, Dr. Femia said.

Clinicians should also be on the lookout for volume loss, or contour change, in discoid lupus patients, because that’s a sign of lupus panniculitis, which involves deeper lesions mainly to fatty areas such as the cheeks or thighs. The disease can progress fast, with sudden, massive loss of body volume, so therapy should be escalated quickly, she said.

“We want to treat these patients aggressively in order to avoid this.”

SOURCE: Femia A. CCR 2018.

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Even when you know a patient’s serology and hear their symptoms and think you have a bead on their rheumatic disease, you might not. It’s vital to check the skin in patients with rheumatic disease to be sure the right disease is being treated and that they don’t actually have a more severe condition that might progress suddenly if left unchecked, said Alisa Femia, MD, assistant professor of dermatology at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.

In a session filled with pearls for rheumatologists on what to look for on their patients’ skin to help guide diagnosis and treatment, she told the story of a woman whom a rheumatologist colleague had correctly diagnosed with dermatomyositis. She was started on prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil, but her skin disease did not clear.

After examining her skin, Dr. Femia became immediately concerned.

“Despite prednisone, despite mycophenolate, here not only does she have Gottron’s papules, but she has erosions within her Gottron’s papules,” Dr. Femia said. The woman also had erosions within papules on her palms.

These were telltale signs of MDA5-associated dermatomyositis, which studies have found to be linked with interstitial lung disease (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Jul;65[1]:25-34). Under her care, these patients ideally undergo lung monitoring every 3 months, Dr. Femia said.

“That is a form of dermatomyositis that you cannot miss,” she said.

The effects of discoid lupus are another reason to take special care in skin examination. Once the disease, which involves a scaling of the skin, is obvious, there can be permanent aesthetic effects that could have been avoided with earlier detection and treatment, Dr. Femia said.

Clinicians should also be on the lookout for volume loss, or contour change, in discoid lupus patients, because that’s a sign of lupus panniculitis, which involves deeper lesions mainly to fatty areas such as the cheeks or thighs. The disease can progress fast, with sudden, massive loss of body volume, so therapy should be escalated quickly, she said.

“We want to treat these patients aggressively in order to avoid this.”

SOURCE: Femia A. CCR 2018.

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Clinicians have long wanted to avoid using corticosteroids in the treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). They’re drawing closer to getting their wish, said Christian Pagnoux, MD, of the department of internal medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto.

The drugs have been a cornerstone in the treatments of these diseases – including granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) – for decades, but they come at the price of osteoporosis, cardiovascular comorbidities, diabetes, increased infection risk, and other problems.

The emergence of newer therapies such as rituximab and complement C5a-blocker avacopan could mean less of a reliance on corticosteroids, Dr. Pagnoux said. The ongoing ADVOCATE trial is assessing the efficacy of avacopan with rituximab or cyclophosphamide, with or without a tapered dose of prednisone for the first 21 weeks.

“Whether we can use a lighter, briefer, shorter corticosteroid regimen for induction is really a burning question,” Dr. Pagnoux said. Avacopan “may totally replace corticosteroids in the very near future,” he said.

Another trial taking an intense look at winnowing corticosteroids from GPA and MPA treatment is the eagerly awaited PEXIVAS trial, an international effort of 700 patients that is the largest ever in AAV, Dr. Pagnoux said.

The primary endpoint in the trial is assessing plasma exchange versus no plasma exchange, but the use of corticosteroids is being assessed as well.

SOURCE: Pagnoux C. CCR 2018.

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Clinicians have long wanted to avoid using corticosteroids in the treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). They’re drawing closer to getting their wish, said Christian Pagnoux, MD, of the department of internal medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto.

The drugs have been a cornerstone in the treatments of these diseases – including granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) – for decades, but they come at the price of osteoporosis, cardiovascular comorbidities, diabetes, increased infection risk, and other problems.

The emergence of newer therapies such as rituximab and complement C5a-blocker avacopan could mean less of a reliance on corticosteroids, Dr. Pagnoux said. The ongoing ADVOCATE trial is assessing the efficacy of avacopan with rituximab or cyclophosphamide, with or without a tapered dose of prednisone for the first 21 weeks.

“Whether we can use a lighter, briefer, shorter corticosteroid regimen for induction is really a burning question,” Dr. Pagnoux said. Avacopan “may totally replace corticosteroids in the very near future,” he said.

Another trial taking an intense look at winnowing corticosteroids from GPA and MPA treatment is the eagerly awaited PEXIVAS trial, an international effort of 700 patients that is the largest ever in AAV, Dr. Pagnoux said.

The primary endpoint in the trial is assessing plasma exchange versus no plasma exchange, but the use of corticosteroids is being assessed as well.

SOURCE: Pagnoux C. CCR 2018.

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Clinicians have long wanted to avoid using corticosteroids in the treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). They’re drawing closer to getting their wish, said Christian Pagnoux, MD, of the department of internal medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto.

The drugs have been a cornerstone in the treatments of these diseases – including granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) – for decades, but they come at the price of osteoporosis, cardiovascular comorbidities, diabetes, increased infection risk, and other problems.

The emergence of newer therapies such as rituximab and complement C5a-blocker avacopan could mean less of a reliance on corticosteroids, Dr. Pagnoux said. The ongoing ADVOCATE trial is assessing the efficacy of avacopan with rituximab or cyclophosphamide, with or without a tapered dose of prednisone for the first 21 weeks.

“Whether we can use a lighter, briefer, shorter corticosteroid regimen for induction is really a burning question,” Dr. Pagnoux said. Avacopan “may totally replace corticosteroids in the very near future,” he said.

Another trial taking an intense look at winnowing corticosteroids from GPA and MPA treatment is the eagerly awaited PEXIVAS trial, an international effort of 700 patients that is the largest ever in AAV, Dr. Pagnoux said.

The primary endpoint in the trial is assessing plasma exchange versus no plasma exchange, but the use of corticosteroids is being assessed as well.

SOURCE: Pagnoux C. CCR 2018.

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Don’t be a slave to imaging when evaluating the patient with sarcoidosis.

“Sometimes, the worst-looking patients [on imaging] have the best prognosis,” Daniel Culver, DO, said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology. Patients with Löfgren’s syndrome are a very good example of this tenet, he said in an interview. Scans can look alarming, with multiple widespread granulomas. But Löfgren’s is generally a benign condition, despite its threatening mien.

Instead of imaging, “Let two things drive your decision to treat: danger to an organ, and quality of life,” said Dr. Culver, a pulmonologist and director of the Sarcoidosis Center of Excellence at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio; he is also president of the World Association for Sarcoidosis.

He agrees with a decision schema published in 2015 (Clin Chest Med. 2015;36[4]:751-67).

Six factors weigh in favor of treatment:

• Symptomatic disease.
• Impaired organ function.
• Disease endangering an organ.
• Progressive disease.
• Clear-cut disease activity.
• Low likelihood of remission.

These must be balanced – with patient input as the fulcrum – against five factors that favor conservative management:

• Minimal symptoms.
• Good organ function.
• Low risk of danger to organs.
• Inactive disease.
• Higher likelihood of remission.

The decision to embark on a treatment program, usually starting with a steroid-based regimen, can’t be taken lightly, Dr. Culver said. A 2017 study showed that steroids pose a cumulative risk of toxicities for sarcoidosis patients (Respir Med. 2017 Nov;132:9-14). Patients who started steroids faced more than a doubling in the risk of a toxic side effect by 96 months when compared with those who didn’t. But even short-term steroid use increased the risk of a toxicity, Dr. Culver said. The study noted that problems can begin to occur in as little as 1 month, at a cumulative dose as low as 1 g.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Culver D. CCR 2018.

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Don’t be a slave to imaging when evaluating the patient with sarcoidosis.

“Sometimes, the worst-looking patients [on imaging] have the best prognosis,” Daniel Culver, DO, said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology. Patients with Löfgren’s syndrome are a very good example of this tenet, he said in an interview. Scans can look alarming, with multiple widespread granulomas. But Löfgren’s is generally a benign condition, despite its threatening mien.

Instead of imaging, “Let two things drive your decision to treat: danger to an organ, and quality of life,” said Dr. Culver, a pulmonologist and director of the Sarcoidosis Center of Excellence at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio; he is also president of the World Association for Sarcoidosis.

He agrees with a decision schema published in 2015 (Clin Chest Med. 2015;36[4]:751-67).

Six factors weigh in favor of treatment:

• Symptomatic disease.
• Impaired organ function.
• Disease endangering an organ.
• Progressive disease.
• Clear-cut disease activity.
• Low likelihood of remission.

These must be balanced – with patient input as the fulcrum – against five factors that favor conservative management:

• Minimal symptoms.
• Good organ function.
• Low risk of danger to organs.
• Inactive disease.
• Higher likelihood of remission.

The decision to embark on a treatment program, usually starting with a steroid-based regimen, can’t be taken lightly, Dr. Culver said. A 2017 study showed that steroids pose a cumulative risk of toxicities for sarcoidosis patients (Respir Med. 2017 Nov;132:9-14). Patients who started steroids faced more than a doubling in the risk of a toxic side effect by 96 months when compared with those who didn’t. But even short-term steroid use increased the risk of a toxicity, Dr. Culver said. The study noted that problems can begin to occur in as little as 1 month, at a cumulative dose as low as 1 g.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Culver D. CCR 2018.

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Don’t be a slave to imaging when evaluating the patient with sarcoidosis.

“Sometimes, the worst-looking patients [on imaging] have the best prognosis,” Daniel Culver, DO, said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology. Patients with Löfgren’s syndrome are a very good example of this tenet, he said in an interview. Scans can look alarming, with multiple widespread granulomas. But Löfgren’s is generally a benign condition, despite its threatening mien.

Instead of imaging, “Let two things drive your decision to treat: danger to an organ, and quality of life,” said Dr. Culver, a pulmonologist and director of the Sarcoidosis Center of Excellence at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio; he is also president of the World Association for Sarcoidosis.

He agrees with a decision schema published in 2015 (Clin Chest Med. 2015;36[4]:751-67).

Six factors weigh in favor of treatment:

• Symptomatic disease.
• Impaired organ function.
• Disease endangering an organ.
• Progressive disease.
• Clear-cut disease activity.
• Low likelihood of remission.

These must be balanced – with patient input as the fulcrum – against five factors that favor conservative management:

• Minimal symptoms.
• Good organ function.
• Low risk of danger to organs.
• Inactive disease.
• Higher likelihood of remission.

The decision to embark on a treatment program, usually starting with a steroid-based regimen, can’t be taken lightly, Dr. Culver said. A 2017 study showed that steroids pose a cumulative risk of toxicities for sarcoidosis patients (Respir Med. 2017 Nov;132:9-14). Patients who started steroids faced more than a doubling in the risk of a toxic side effect by 96 months when compared with those who didn’t. But even short-term steroid use increased the risk of a toxicity, Dr. Culver said. The study noted that problems can begin to occur in as little as 1 month, at a cumulative dose as low as 1 g.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Culver D. CCR 2018.

BOSTON – Endocrinologists need to be familiar with new practice guidelines and changes in the landscape of transgender health care, Joshua D. Safer, MD, executive director of the Mount Sinai Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery, New York, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

“We endocrinologists ... need to be able to help (gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent) individuals, even if it’s just an occasional patient, to do what is safe and to be expert (in transgender health care), just as we are with other hormone treatments,” he said in a discussion of aspects of the Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline on endocrine treatment of gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent individuals.

The new guidelines, published in November 2017, update 2009 guidance from the society. Among the big changes are the recognition that there may be “compelling reasons” to start cross-sex hormonal therapy prior to the old age cutoff of 16 years, which is “very late if you’re thinking about it from a biological perspective,” said Dr. Safer.

Another major change challenges the idea that a mental health professional is necessary to diagnose adults. Rather, any knowledgeable clinician could make the diagnosis, according to Dr. Safer.

The guidelines also recommend that endocrinologists provide education regarding onset and time course of physical changes induced by sex hormone treatments to transgender individuals undergoing treatment.

BOSTON – Endocrinologists need to be familiar with new practice guidelines and changes in the landscape of transgender health care, Joshua D. Safer, MD, executive director of the Mount Sinai Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery, New York, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

“We endocrinologists ... need to be able to help (gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent) individuals, even if it’s just an occasional patient, to do what is safe and to be expert (in transgender health care), just as we are with other hormone treatments,” he said in a discussion of aspects of the Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline on endocrine treatment of gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent individuals.

The new guidelines, published in November 2017, update 2009 guidance from the society. Among the big changes are the recognition that there may be “compelling reasons” to start cross-sex hormonal therapy prior to the old age cutoff of 16 years, which is “very late if you’re thinking about it from a biological perspective,” said Dr. Safer.

Another major change challenges the idea that a mental health professional is necessary to diagnose adults. Rather, any knowledgeable clinician could make the diagnosis, according to Dr. Safer.

The guidelines also recommend that endocrinologists provide education regarding onset and time course of physical changes induced by sex hormone treatments to transgender individuals undergoing treatment.

BOSTON – Endocrinologists need to be familiar with new practice guidelines and changes in the landscape of transgender health care, Joshua D. Safer, MD, executive director of the Mount Sinai Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery, New York, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

“We endocrinologists ... need to be able to help (gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent) individuals, even if it’s just an occasional patient, to do what is safe and to be expert (in transgender health care), just as we are with other hormone treatments,” he said in a discussion of aspects of the Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline on endocrine treatment of gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent individuals.

The new guidelines, published in November 2017, update 2009 guidance from the society. Among the big changes are the recognition that there may be “compelling reasons” to start cross-sex hormonal therapy prior to the old age cutoff of 16 years, which is “very late if you’re thinking about it from a biological perspective,” said Dr. Safer.

Another major change challenges the idea that a mental health professional is necessary to diagnose adults. Rather, any knowledgeable clinician could make the diagnosis, according to Dr. Safer.

The guidelines also recommend that endocrinologists provide education regarding onset and time course of physical changes induced by sex hormone treatments to transgender individuals undergoing treatment.

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Lyme disease is spreading in the United States, which makes it a high priority for rheumatologists, who will need to care for an increasing number of patients with posttreatment disorders affecting the joints, an expert said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.

Sheila Arvikar, MD, an instructor in the rheumatology division at Harvard Medical School, Boston, said that the disease – the most common vector-borne illness in the United States – is no longer strictly confined to the U.S. Northeast and the upper Midwest, according to reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Neighboring areas are increasingly affected, the reports have shown.

That the disease may be spreading makes the need for awareness and better testing more acute, she said. Current testing is limited by a lack of sensitivity in early disease, and the standard two-tier combination of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot can be time consuming. But recent studies have found that whole cell sonicate ELISA combined with an ELISA for peptide C6 are equally or even more effective than the more cumbersome, two-tier version, Dr. Arvikar said.

A problem encountered by rheumatologists are patients who contracted Lyme disease but who continue to have joint pain and other symptoms despite treatment for the disease. This so-called posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS) can be similar to fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome, involving chronic symptoms but no chronic infection and no objective synovitis or inflammation.

There are no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatments for it, but options such as tricyclics, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, gabapentin, and pregabalin can be helpful, she said, along with exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapy. She also noted myriad alternative treatments marketed for PTLDS that have not been shown to be effective and can even be harmful, such as urine ingestion and treatment with bee venom.

“These patients are really desperate for anything to help with their symptoms, and there are lot of people out there who are preying on them with these therapies that aren’t really helpful. It’s important for us to be aware that these things are out there.”

Dr. Arvikar reported having no financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Arvikar S, CCR 2018.

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Lyme disease is spreading in the United States, which makes it a high priority for rheumatologists, who will need to care for an increasing number of patients with posttreatment disorders affecting the joints, an expert said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.

Sheila Arvikar, MD, an instructor in the rheumatology division at Harvard Medical School, Boston, said that the disease – the most common vector-borne illness in the United States – is no longer strictly confined to the U.S. Northeast and the upper Midwest, according to reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Neighboring areas are increasingly affected, the reports have shown.

That the disease may be spreading makes the need for awareness and better testing more acute, she said. Current testing is limited by a lack of sensitivity in early disease, and the standard two-tier combination of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot can be time consuming. But recent studies have found that whole cell sonicate ELISA combined with an ELISA for peptide C6 are equally or even more effective than the more cumbersome, two-tier version, Dr. Arvikar said.

A problem encountered by rheumatologists are patients who contracted Lyme disease but who continue to have joint pain and other symptoms despite treatment for the disease. This so-called posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS) can be similar to fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome, involving chronic symptoms but no chronic infection and no objective synovitis or inflammation.

There are no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatments for it, but options such as tricyclics, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, gabapentin, and pregabalin can be helpful, she said, along with exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapy. She also noted myriad alternative treatments marketed for PTLDS that have not been shown to be effective and can even be harmful, such as urine ingestion and treatment with bee venom.

“These patients are really desperate for anything to help with their symptoms, and there are lot of people out there who are preying on them with these therapies that aren’t really helpful. It’s important for us to be aware that these things are out there.”

Dr. Arvikar reported having no financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Arvikar S, CCR 2018.

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Lyme disease is spreading in the United States, which makes it a high priority for rheumatologists, who will need to care for an increasing number of patients with posttreatment disorders affecting the joints, an expert said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.

Sheila Arvikar, MD, an instructor in the rheumatology division at Harvard Medical School, Boston, said that the disease – the most common vector-borne illness in the United States – is no longer strictly confined to the U.S. Northeast and the upper Midwest, according to reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Neighboring areas are increasingly affected, the reports have shown.

That the disease may be spreading makes the need for awareness and better testing more acute, she said. Current testing is limited by a lack of sensitivity in early disease, and the standard two-tier combination of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot can be time consuming. But recent studies have found that whole cell sonicate ELISA combined with an ELISA for peptide C6 are equally or even more effective than the more cumbersome, two-tier version, Dr. Arvikar said.

A problem encountered by rheumatologists are patients who contracted Lyme disease but who continue to have joint pain and other symptoms despite treatment for the disease. This so-called posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS) can be similar to fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome, involving chronic symptoms but no chronic infection and no objective synovitis or inflammation.

There are no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatments for it, but options such as tricyclics, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, gabapentin, and pregabalin can be helpful, she said, along with exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapy. She also noted myriad alternative treatments marketed for PTLDS that have not been shown to be effective and can even be harmful, such as urine ingestion and treatment with bee venom.

“These patients are really desperate for anything to help with their symptoms, and there are lot of people out there who are preying on them with these therapies that aren’t really helpful. It’s important for us to be aware that these things are out there.”

Dr. Arvikar reported having no financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Arvikar S, CCR 2018.

BOSTON – Women with type 1 diabetes had a high prevalence of systemic collagen vascular diseases in a recent study, suggesting a global or progressive loss of immune tolerance, investigators reported at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

“The median time of diagnosis for most of those autoimmune diseases was years after the diabetes diagnosis,” according to investigator Yicheng Bao, a medical student at University of Missouri-Kansas City.*

“I think there’s some loss of immune tolerance in these patients with type 1 diabetes that really deserves more study as these patients get older,” Mr. Bao said in a video interview.

The study from Mr. Bao and his colleagues was based on patient questionnaire responses and medical chart reviews for 1,167 adults with type 1 diabetes, including 628 women.

They found that SCVDs occurred in 9.2% of women, who had a significantly higher risk versus men (adjusted odds ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-3.34; P less than 0.0001).

Rheumatoid arthritis was the most commonly diagnosed SCVD, occurring in 4.3% of the women, followed by psoriasis at 2.6% and lupus at 1.8%. Others occurring in less than 1% of women included Sjögren’s, mixed connective tissue disease, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, juvenile RA, and scleroderma.

Older women were at higher risk of SCVD, with a mean age of 53.6 years versus 46.3 years for women with no SCVD (P = 0.006).

*This article was updated on May 18, 2018.

BOSTON – Women with type 1 diabetes had a high prevalence of systemic collagen vascular diseases in a recent study, suggesting a global or progressive loss of immune tolerance, investigators reported at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

“The median time of diagnosis for most of those autoimmune diseases was years after the diabetes diagnosis,” according to investigator Yicheng Bao, a medical student at University of Missouri-Kansas City.*

“I think there’s some loss of immune tolerance in these patients with type 1 diabetes that really deserves more study as these patients get older,” Mr. Bao said in a video interview.

The study from Mr. Bao and his colleagues was based on patient questionnaire responses and medical chart reviews for 1,167 adults with type 1 diabetes, including 628 women.

They found that SCVDs occurred in 9.2% of women, who had a significantly higher risk versus men (adjusted odds ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-3.34; P less than 0.0001).

Rheumatoid arthritis was the most commonly diagnosed SCVD, occurring in 4.3% of the women, followed by psoriasis at 2.6% and lupus at 1.8%. Others occurring in less than 1% of women included Sjögren’s, mixed connective tissue disease, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, juvenile RA, and scleroderma.

Older women were at higher risk of SCVD, with a mean age of 53.6 years versus 46.3 years for women with no SCVD (P = 0.006).

*This article was updated on May 18, 2018.

BOSTON – Women with type 1 diabetes had a high prevalence of systemic collagen vascular diseases in a recent study, suggesting a global or progressive loss of immune tolerance, investigators reported at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

“The median time of diagnosis for most of those autoimmune diseases was years after the diabetes diagnosis,” according to investigator Yicheng Bao, a medical student at University of Missouri-Kansas City.*

“I think there’s some loss of immune tolerance in these patients with type 1 diabetes that really deserves more study as these patients get older,” Mr. Bao said in a video interview.

The study from Mr. Bao and his colleagues was based on patient questionnaire responses and medical chart reviews for 1,167 adults with type 1 diabetes, including 628 women.

They found that SCVDs occurred in 9.2% of women, who had a significantly higher risk versus men (adjusted odds ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-3.34; P less than 0.0001).

Rheumatoid arthritis was the most commonly diagnosed SCVD, occurring in 4.3% of the women, followed by psoriasis at 2.6% and lupus at 1.8%. Others occurring in less than 1% of women included Sjögren’s, mixed connective tissue disease, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, juvenile RA, and scleroderma.

Older women were at higher risk of SCVD, with a mean age of 53.6 years versus 46.3 years for women with no SCVD (P = 0.006).

*This article was updated on May 18, 2018.

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Patients with isolated skin vasculitis have always faced a frustrating clinical problem with no clear solution.

ARAMIS (A Randomized Multicenter Study for Isolated Skin Vasculitis) and its linked genetic investigation, CUTIS (Clinical Transcriptomics in Systemic Vasculitis), may finally identify not only optimal treatments but also insight into the root causes and predictors of treatment response, Christian Pagnoux, MD, said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.

“Isolated skin vasculitis is a much-understudied disease, with only one clinical trial to guide our treatment,” said Dr. Pagnoux of the Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto. In 1995, a 3-month trial randomized 41 patients to skin emollients or to colchicine 0.5 mg/day. Colchicine wasn’t significantly better, but some who had attained remission on it relapsed after discontinuing the drug, which suggested there might be some benefit (Arch Dermatol. 1995;131[12]:1399-1402).

That hint of efficacy in just three patients 23 years ago forms the sole basis of the typical treatment for this disorder: colchicine, Dr. Pagnoux said. “We know that it doesn’t work, yet we continue to prescribe it. Patients deserve better.”

ARAMIS and CUTIS are the first attempts since then at solving this puzzle. ARAMIS is now recruiting about 90 patients in 10 North American medical centers. The three-armed crossover trial will randomize patients to colchicine 0.6 mg twice a day, dapsone 150 mg/day, or azathioprine 2 mg/kg per day for 6 months. Nonresponders can then be rerandomized to one of the other two study drugs for another 6 months. The primary endpoint is clinical response. Secondary endpoints include changes in physician and patient global assessment of response, Skindex29 score, health-related quality of life, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.

ARAMIS patients may also participate in CUTIS, the linked histopathologic and genetic investigation. More broad-ranging than ARAMIS, CUTIS is seeking 50 patients with several forms of idiopathic vasculitis, including cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, drug-induced vasculitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, IgA vasculitis, isolated cutaneous vasculitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, polyarteritis nodosa, and urticarial vasculitis.

The study will examine histopathologic and transcriptomic characteristics in punch biopsies of the lesions. “We very much hope that gene expression profiling on these lesions will help define novel pathways and help us to classify and target therapies,” Dr. Pagnoux said.

To learn more about these studies and refer patients into them, visit the Rare Disease Network pages for ARAMIS and CUTIS.

Dr. Pagnoux had no financial disclosures relevant to either study.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Pagnoux C. CCR 2018

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Patients with isolated skin vasculitis have always faced a frustrating clinical problem with no clear solution.

ARAMIS (A Randomized Multicenter Study for Isolated Skin Vasculitis) and its linked genetic investigation, CUTIS (Clinical Transcriptomics in Systemic Vasculitis), may finally identify not only optimal treatments but also insight into the root causes and predictors of treatment response, Christian Pagnoux, MD, said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.

“Isolated skin vasculitis is a much-understudied disease, with only one clinical trial to guide our treatment,” said Dr. Pagnoux of the Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto. In 1995, a 3-month trial randomized 41 patients to skin emollients or to colchicine 0.5 mg/day. Colchicine wasn’t significantly better, but some who had attained remission on it relapsed after discontinuing the drug, which suggested there might be some benefit (Arch Dermatol. 1995;131[12]:1399-1402).

That hint of efficacy in just three patients 23 years ago forms the sole basis of the typical treatment for this disorder: colchicine, Dr. Pagnoux said. “We know that it doesn’t work, yet we continue to prescribe it. Patients deserve better.”

ARAMIS and CUTIS are the first attempts since then at solving this puzzle. ARAMIS is now recruiting about 90 patients in 10 North American medical centers. The three-armed crossover trial will randomize patients to colchicine 0.6 mg twice a day, dapsone 150 mg/day, or azathioprine 2 mg/kg per day for 6 months. Nonresponders can then be rerandomized to one of the other two study drugs for another 6 months. The primary endpoint is clinical response. Secondary endpoints include changes in physician and patient global assessment of response, Skindex29 score, health-related quality of life, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.

ARAMIS patients may also participate in CUTIS, the linked histopathologic and genetic investigation. More broad-ranging than ARAMIS, CUTIS is seeking 50 patients with several forms of idiopathic vasculitis, including cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, drug-induced vasculitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, IgA vasculitis, isolated cutaneous vasculitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, polyarteritis nodosa, and urticarial vasculitis.

The study will examine histopathologic and transcriptomic characteristics in punch biopsies of the lesions. “We very much hope that gene expression profiling on these lesions will help define novel pathways and help us to classify and target therapies,” Dr. Pagnoux said.

To learn more about these studies and refer patients into them, visit the Rare Disease Network pages for ARAMIS and CUTIS.

Dr. Pagnoux had no financial disclosures relevant to either study.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Pagnoux C. CCR 2018

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Patients with isolated skin vasculitis have always faced a frustrating clinical problem with no clear solution.

ARAMIS (A Randomized Multicenter Study for Isolated Skin Vasculitis) and its linked genetic investigation, CUTIS (Clinical Transcriptomics in Systemic Vasculitis), may finally identify not only optimal treatments but also insight into the root causes and predictors of treatment response, Christian Pagnoux, MD, said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.

“Isolated skin vasculitis is a much-understudied disease, with only one clinical trial to guide our treatment,” said Dr. Pagnoux of the Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto. In 1995, a 3-month trial randomized 41 patients to skin emollients or to colchicine 0.5 mg/day. Colchicine wasn’t significantly better, but some who had attained remission on it relapsed after discontinuing the drug, which suggested there might be some benefit (Arch Dermatol. 1995;131[12]:1399-1402).

That hint of efficacy in just three patients 23 years ago forms the sole basis of the typical treatment for this disorder: colchicine, Dr. Pagnoux said. “We know that it doesn’t work, yet we continue to prescribe it. Patients deserve better.”

ARAMIS and CUTIS are the first attempts since then at solving this puzzle. ARAMIS is now recruiting about 90 patients in 10 North American medical centers. The three-armed crossover trial will randomize patients to colchicine 0.6 mg twice a day, dapsone 150 mg/day, or azathioprine 2 mg/kg per day for 6 months. Nonresponders can then be rerandomized to one of the other two study drugs for another 6 months. The primary endpoint is clinical response. Secondary endpoints include changes in physician and patient global assessment of response, Skindex29 score, health-related quality of life, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.

ARAMIS patients may also participate in CUTIS, the linked histopathologic and genetic investigation. More broad-ranging than ARAMIS, CUTIS is seeking 50 patients with several forms of idiopathic vasculitis, including cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, drug-induced vasculitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, IgA vasculitis, isolated cutaneous vasculitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, polyarteritis nodosa, and urticarial vasculitis.

The study will examine histopathologic and transcriptomic characteristics in punch biopsies of the lesions. “We very much hope that gene expression profiling on these lesions will help define novel pathways and help us to classify and target therapies,” Dr. Pagnoux said.

To learn more about these studies and refer patients into them, visit the Rare Disease Network pages for ARAMIS and CUTIS.

Dr. Pagnoux had no financial disclosures relevant to either study.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Pagnoux C. CCR 2018

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Big data informing patient treatment, computer algorithms reading imaging instead of humans, and even accurate patient self-diagnosis could emerge over the next 10 years in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, an expert said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.

Gerd Burmester, MD, director of rheumatology and clinical immunology at Charité University in Berlin, trotted out staggering numbers on future medical data collection on patients. Data analytics companies project that more than 1,000 terabytes of data per lifetime is expected to be gathered, with just 10% expected to be clinical information and 30% in the form of “-omics,” such as proteomics and genomics, he said. The other 60% is expected to come from sensors and wearables that patients essentially collect themselves with their own devices, he said.

“We will have to use data in the interest of the patient,” he said. “This is the real secret. In order to do this, we need cognitive computing, which assesses structured and unstructured data and is self-learning.”

The days of images being read by human radiologists could be numbered, he said.

“There will be a revolution in imaging scoring,” he said, with computer algorithms generating scores, more quickly separating the normal scans from those that need clinical attention.

He described a possible scenario in which patients get genetic analyses, blood biomarker testing, and imaging performed at kiosks about town, producing a diagnosis without a single physician visit. It might seem fanciful, but when he asked the audience how many thought it was impossible over the next decade, no one raised a hand.

With advances such as the self-rheumatoid arthritis examination tool Rheuma-Check and the decline in cost for whole genome sequencing – along with wait times to see rheumatologists sometimes as long as 6 months – such a scenario might not be far fetched, Dr. Burmester said. It is possible, he said, because patient histories that used to sit in charts, images that used to be on film only, and genetic data that used to be unavailable, are all now in structured, digital form.

Referring to a recent commentary in the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Burmester said physicians have to accept the coming role of computer algorithms.

“If medicine wishes to stay in control of its own future,” he said, “physicians will not only have to embrace algorithms, they will also have to excel at developing and evaluating them, bringing machine-learning methods into the medical domain.”

SOURCE: Burmester, G. CCR 2018.

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Big data informing patient treatment, computer algorithms reading imaging instead of humans, and even accurate patient self-diagnosis could emerge over the next 10 years in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, an expert said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.

Gerd Burmester, MD, director of rheumatology and clinical immunology at Charité University in Berlin, trotted out staggering numbers on future medical data collection on patients. Data analytics companies project that more than 1,000 terabytes of data per lifetime is expected to be gathered, with just 10% expected to be clinical information and 30% in the form of “-omics,” such as proteomics and genomics, he said. The other 60% is expected to come from sensors and wearables that patients essentially collect themselves with their own devices, he said.

“We will have to use data in the interest of the patient,” he said. “This is the real secret. In order to do this, we need cognitive computing, which assesses structured and unstructured data and is self-learning.”

The days of images being read by human radiologists could be numbered, he said.

“There will be a revolution in imaging scoring,” he said, with computer algorithms generating scores, more quickly separating the normal scans from those that need clinical attention.

He described a possible scenario in which patients get genetic analyses, blood biomarker testing, and imaging performed at kiosks about town, producing a diagnosis without a single physician visit. It might seem fanciful, but when he asked the audience how many thought it was impossible over the next decade, no one raised a hand.

With advances such as the self-rheumatoid arthritis examination tool Rheuma-Check and the decline in cost for whole genome sequencing – along with wait times to see rheumatologists sometimes as long as 6 months – such a scenario might not be far fetched, Dr. Burmester said. It is possible, he said, because patient histories that used to sit in charts, images that used to be on film only, and genetic data that used to be unavailable, are all now in structured, digital form.

Referring to a recent commentary in the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Burmester said physicians have to accept the coming role of computer algorithms.

“If medicine wishes to stay in control of its own future,” he said, “physicians will not only have to embrace algorithms, they will also have to excel at developing and evaluating them, bringing machine-learning methods into the medical domain.”

SOURCE: Burmester, G. CCR 2018.

SANDESTIN, FLA. – Big data informing patient treatment, computer algorithms reading imaging instead of humans, and even accurate patient self-diagnosis could emerge over the next 10 years in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, an expert said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.

Gerd Burmester, MD, director of rheumatology and clinical immunology at Charité University in Berlin, trotted out staggering numbers on future medical data collection on patients. Data analytics companies project that more than 1,000 terabytes of data per lifetime is expected to be gathered, with just 10% expected to be clinical information and 30% in the form of “-omics,” such as proteomics and genomics, he said. The other 60% is expected to come from sensors and wearables that patients essentially collect themselves with their own devices, he said.

“We will have to use data in the interest of the patient,” he said. “This is the real secret. In order to do this, we need cognitive computing, which assesses structured and unstructured data and is self-learning.”

The days of images being read by human radiologists could be numbered, he said.

“There will be a revolution in imaging scoring,” he said, with computer algorithms generating scores, more quickly separating the normal scans from those that need clinical attention.

He described a possible scenario in which patients get genetic analyses, blood biomarker testing, and imaging performed at kiosks about town, producing a diagnosis without a single physician visit. It might seem fanciful, but when he asked the audience how many thought it was impossible over the next decade, no one raised a hand.

With advances such as the self-rheumatoid arthritis examination tool Rheuma-Check and the decline in cost for whole genome sequencing – along with wait times to see rheumatologists sometimes as long as 6 months – such a scenario might not be far fetched, Dr. Burmester said. It is possible, he said, because patient histories that used to sit in charts, images that used to be on film only, and genetic data that used to be unavailable, are all now in structured, digital form.

Referring to a recent commentary in the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Burmester said physicians have to accept the coming role of computer algorithms.

“If medicine wishes to stay in control of its own future,” he said, “physicians will not only have to embrace algorithms, they will also have to excel at developing and evaluating them, bringing machine-learning methods into the medical domain.”

SOURCE: Burmester, G. CCR 2018.

BOSTON – An index that takes into account the ratio between body mass index (BMI) and bone mineral density (BMD) correlated well with trabecular bone scores, a newer assessment of bone fragility. The index may help predict risk for fragility fractures in individuals with obesity when trabecular bone scores are not available.

“Obesity is traditionally thought to be protective against bone fractures,” said Mikiko Watanabe, MD, an endocrinologist at Sapienza University of Rome. “But recent evidence suggests that this is not entirely true, especially in morbidly obese patients.”

Lumbar spine BMD alone may not accurately capture bone fragility in patients with obesity, said Dr. Watanabe in an interview at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

Adding the trabecular bone score (TBS) to BMD gives additional information about bone microarchitecture, refining risk assessment for fragility fractures. This newer technology, however, may not be readily available and may be associated with extra cost.

Accordingly, said Dr. Watanabe, the study’s senior investigator, Sapienza University’s Carla Lubrano, MD, had the idea to index bone density to BMI, and then see how well the ratio correlated to TBS; obesity is known to be associated with lower TBS scores, indicating increased bone fragility.

Living in Italy, with relatively fewer medical resources available, “We were trying to find some readily available index that could predict the risk of fracture as well as the indexes that are around right now,” said Dr. Watanabe.

“We did find some very interesting data in our population of over 2,000 obese patients living in Rome,” she said. “We do confirm something from the literature, where BMD tends to go high with increasing BMI.” Further, the relatively weak correlation between TBS and BMI was confirmed in the investigators’ work (r = 0.3).

[email protected]

BOSTON – An index that takes into account the ratio between body mass index (BMI) and bone mineral density (BMD) correlated well with trabecular bone scores, a newer assessment of bone fragility. The index may help predict risk for fragility fractures in individuals with obesity when trabecular bone scores are not available.

“Obesity is traditionally thought to be protective against bone fractures,” said Mikiko Watanabe, MD, an endocrinologist at Sapienza University of Rome. “But recent evidence suggests that this is not entirely true, especially in morbidly obese patients.”

Lumbar spine BMD alone may not accurately capture bone fragility in patients with obesity, said Dr. Watanabe in an interview at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

Adding the trabecular bone score (TBS) to BMD gives additional information about bone microarchitecture, refining risk assessment for fragility fractures. This newer technology, however, may not be readily available and may be associated with extra cost.

Accordingly, said Dr. Watanabe, the study’s senior investigator, Sapienza University’s Carla Lubrano, MD, had the idea to index bone density to BMI, and then see how well the ratio correlated to TBS; obesity is known to be associated with lower TBS scores, indicating increased bone fragility.

Living in Italy, with relatively fewer medical resources available, “We were trying to find some readily available index that could predict the risk of fracture as well as the indexes that are around right now,” said Dr. Watanabe.

“We did find some very interesting data in our population of over 2,000 obese patients living in Rome,” she said. “We do confirm something from the literature, where BMD tends to go high with increasing BMI.” Further, the relatively weak correlation between TBS and BMI was confirmed in the investigators’ work (r = 0.3).

[email protected]

BOSTON – An index that takes into account the ratio between body mass index (BMI) and bone mineral density (BMD) correlated well with trabecular bone scores, a newer assessment of bone fragility. The index may help predict risk for fragility fractures in individuals with obesity when trabecular bone scores are not available.

“Obesity is traditionally thought to be protective against bone fractures,” said Mikiko Watanabe, MD, an endocrinologist at Sapienza University of Rome. “But recent evidence suggests that this is not entirely true, especially in morbidly obese patients.”

Lumbar spine BMD alone may not accurately capture bone fragility in patients with obesity, said Dr. Watanabe in an interview at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

Adding the trabecular bone score (TBS) to BMD gives additional information about bone microarchitecture, refining risk assessment for fragility fractures. This newer technology, however, may not be readily available and may be associated with extra cost.

Accordingly, said Dr. Watanabe, the study’s senior investigator, Sapienza University’s Carla Lubrano, MD, had the idea to index bone density to BMI, and then see how well the ratio correlated to TBS; obesity is known to be associated with lower TBS scores, indicating increased bone fragility.

Living in Italy, with relatively fewer medical resources available, “We were trying to find some readily available index that could predict the risk of fracture as well as the indexes that are around right now,” said Dr. Watanabe.

“We did find some very interesting data in our population of over 2,000 obese patients living in Rome,” she said. “We do confirm something from the literature, where BMD tends to go high with increasing BMI.” Further, the relatively weak correlation between TBS and BMI was confirmed in the investigators’ work (r = 0.3).

[email protected]

BOSTON – Acute weight loss during the first year after bariatric surgery has a significant effect on hemoglobin A_1c level improvement at 5 years’ follow-up, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

The data presented could help clinicians understand when and where to focus their efforts to help patients optimize weight loss in order to see the best long-term benefits of the procedure, according to presenter Keren Zhou, MD, an endocrinology fellow at the Cleveland Clinic.

“Clinicians need to really focus on that first year weight loss after bariatric surgery to try and optimize 5-year A_1c outcomes,” said Dr. Zhou. “It also answers another question people have been having, which is how much does weight regain after bariatric surgery really matter? What we’ve been able to show here is that weight regain didn’t look very correlated at all.”

Dr. Zhou and her colleagues developed the ancillary study using data from the STAMPEDE (Surgical Treatment and Medications Potentially Eradicate Diabetes Efficiently) trial, specifically looking at 96 patients: 49 who underwent bariatric surgery and 47 who had a sleeve gastrectomy.

Patients were majority female, on average 48 years old, with a mean body mass index of 36.5 and HbA_1c level of 9.4.

Overall, bariatric surgery patients lost an average of 27.2% in the first year, and regained around 8.2% from the first to fifth year, while sleeve gastrectomy lost and regained 25.1% and 9.4% respectively.

When comparing weight loss in the first year and HbA_1c levels, Dr. Zhou and her colleagues found a significant correlation for both bariatric surgery and sleeve gastrectomy patients (r +.34; P = .0006).

“It was interesting because when we graphically represented the weight changes in addition to the A_1c over time, we found that they actually correlated quite closely, but it was only when we did the statistical analysis on the numbers that we found that [in both groups] people who lost less weight had a higher A_1c at the 5-year mark,” said Dr. Zhou.

In the non–multivariable analysis, however, investigators found a more significant correlation between weight regain and HbA_1c levels in gastrectomy patients, however these findings changed when Dr. Zhou and her fellow investigators controlled for insulin use and baseline C-peptide.

In continuing studies, Dr. Zhou and her team will dive deeper into why these correlations exist, as right now they can only speculate.

Dr. Zhou reported no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Zhou K et al. AACE 18. Abstract 240-F.

BOSTON – Acute weight loss during the first year after bariatric surgery has a significant effect on hemoglobin A_1c level improvement at 5 years’ follow-up, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

The data presented could help clinicians understand when and where to focus their efforts to help patients optimize weight loss in order to see the best long-term benefits of the procedure, according to presenter Keren Zhou, MD, an endocrinology fellow at the Cleveland Clinic.

“Clinicians need to really focus on that first year weight loss after bariatric surgery to try and optimize 5-year A_1c outcomes,” said Dr. Zhou. “It also answers another question people have been having, which is how much does weight regain after bariatric surgery really matter? What we’ve been able to show here is that weight regain didn’t look very correlated at all.”

Dr. Zhou and her colleagues developed the ancillary study using data from the STAMPEDE (Surgical Treatment and Medications Potentially Eradicate Diabetes Efficiently) trial, specifically looking at 96 patients: 49 who underwent bariatric surgery and 47 who had a sleeve gastrectomy.

Patients were majority female, on average 48 years old, with a mean body mass index of 36.5 and HbA_1c level of 9.4.

Overall, bariatric surgery patients lost an average of 27.2% in the first year, and regained around 8.2% from the first to fifth year, while sleeve gastrectomy lost and regained 25.1% and 9.4% respectively.

When comparing weight loss in the first year and HbA_1c levels, Dr. Zhou and her colleagues found a significant correlation for both bariatric surgery and sleeve gastrectomy patients (r +.34; P = .0006).

“It was interesting because when we graphically represented the weight changes in addition to the A_1c over time, we found that they actually correlated quite closely, but it was only when we did the statistical analysis on the numbers that we found that [in both groups] people who lost less weight had a higher A_1c at the 5-year mark,” said Dr. Zhou.

In the non–multivariable analysis, however, investigators found a more significant correlation between weight regain and HbA_1c levels in gastrectomy patients, however these findings changed when Dr. Zhou and her fellow investigators controlled for insulin use and baseline C-peptide.

In continuing studies, Dr. Zhou and her team will dive deeper into why these correlations exist, as right now they can only speculate.

Dr. Zhou reported no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Zhou K et al. AACE 18. Abstract 240-F.

BOSTON – Acute weight loss during the first year after bariatric surgery has a significant effect on hemoglobin A_1c level improvement at 5 years’ follow-up, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

The data presented could help clinicians understand when and where to focus their efforts to help patients optimize weight loss in order to see the best long-term benefits of the procedure, according to presenter Keren Zhou, MD, an endocrinology fellow at the Cleveland Clinic.

“Clinicians need to really focus on that first year weight loss after bariatric surgery to try and optimize 5-year A_1c outcomes,” said Dr. Zhou. “It also answers another question people have been having, which is how much does weight regain after bariatric surgery really matter? What we’ve been able to show here is that weight regain didn’t look very correlated at all.”

Dr. Zhou and her colleagues developed the ancillary study using data from the STAMPEDE (Surgical Treatment and Medications Potentially Eradicate Diabetes Efficiently) trial, specifically looking at 96 patients: 49 who underwent bariatric surgery and 47 who had a sleeve gastrectomy.

Patients were majority female, on average 48 years old, with a mean body mass index of 36.5 and HbA_1c level of 9.4.

Overall, bariatric surgery patients lost an average of 27.2% in the first year, and regained around 8.2% from the first to fifth year, while sleeve gastrectomy lost and regained 25.1% and 9.4% respectively.

When comparing weight loss in the first year and HbA_1c levels, Dr. Zhou and her colleagues found a significant correlation for both bariatric surgery and sleeve gastrectomy patients (r +.34; P = .0006).

“It was interesting because when we graphically represented the weight changes in addition to the A_1c over time, we found that they actually correlated quite closely, but it was only when we did the statistical analysis on the numbers that we found that [in both groups] people who lost less weight had a higher A_1c at the 5-year mark,” said Dr. Zhou.

In the non–multivariable analysis, however, investigators found a more significant correlation between weight regain and HbA_1c levels in gastrectomy patients, however these findings changed when Dr. Zhou and her fellow investigators controlled for insulin use and baseline C-peptide.

In continuing studies, Dr. Zhou and her team will dive deeper into why these correlations exist, as right now they can only speculate.

Dr. Zhou reported no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Zhou K et al. AACE 18. Abstract 240-F.