User login
Stay on top of perioperative medicine
The fluid, evolving nature of perioperative medicine lends itself to a lively literature review and research update, according to Steven L. Cohn, MD, SFHM, a presenter of “ ‘A Whole New World’ of Perioperative Medicine: The 2018 Update” on Monday, April 9, at HM18.
The perioperative medicine update has been a fixture at the SHM annual conference for several years and provides an opportunity to highlight articles that may affect practice, said Dr. Cohn of the University of Miami in an interview. “Our goals are to familiarize the attendees with this new data so they are aware, so they can review the key articles in detail on their own, and so they can then apply the new information in their clinical practices,” he said.
The agenda for the session involves a presentation of 10-15 articles published since HM17. Dr. Cohn and presenter Paul J. Grant, MD, SFHM, the director of the consultative and perioperative medicine program and an associate chief medical information officer at Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, will briefly review the objectives and methods of each study before moving on to focus primarily on the result and conclusions.
“The top take-home message is to try to keep up with the perioperative literature, particularly in cardiology, because the evidence base keeps expanding and changing,” said Dr. Cohn. “This session is designed to deliver new information and also to stimulate the attendees to periodically review the literature on their own during the year,” he said.
This year’s collection of articles will address a range of topics, Dr. Cohn said, but he highlighted several articles “that will be thought provoking and potentially impact clinical practice regarding perioperative surveillance with the new fifth generation high sensitivity troponin assay and management of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery. In particular, results from the MANAGE trial that was presented as a late-breaking trial at the American College of Cardiology meeting in March will be of interest to anyone involved in perioperative medicine,” he noted.
Dr. Cohn and Dr. Grant had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
“A Whole New World” of Perioperative Medicine: The 2018 Update
Monday, April 9, 2:00-2:40 p.m.
Crystal Ballroom G2/C-F
The fluid, evolving nature of perioperative medicine lends itself to a lively literature review and research update, according to Steven L. Cohn, MD, SFHM, a presenter of “ ‘A Whole New World’ of Perioperative Medicine: The 2018 Update” on Monday, April 9, at HM18.
The perioperative medicine update has been a fixture at the SHM annual conference for several years and provides an opportunity to highlight articles that may affect practice, said Dr. Cohn of the University of Miami in an interview. “Our goals are to familiarize the attendees with this new data so they are aware, so they can review the key articles in detail on their own, and so they can then apply the new information in their clinical practices,” he said.
The agenda for the session involves a presentation of 10-15 articles published since HM17. Dr. Cohn and presenter Paul J. Grant, MD, SFHM, the director of the consultative and perioperative medicine program and an associate chief medical information officer at Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, will briefly review the objectives and methods of each study before moving on to focus primarily on the result and conclusions.
“The top take-home message is to try to keep up with the perioperative literature, particularly in cardiology, because the evidence base keeps expanding and changing,” said Dr. Cohn. “This session is designed to deliver new information and also to stimulate the attendees to periodically review the literature on their own during the year,” he said.
This year’s collection of articles will address a range of topics, Dr. Cohn said, but he highlighted several articles “that will be thought provoking and potentially impact clinical practice regarding perioperative surveillance with the new fifth generation high sensitivity troponin assay and management of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery. In particular, results from the MANAGE trial that was presented as a late-breaking trial at the American College of Cardiology meeting in March will be of interest to anyone involved in perioperative medicine,” he noted.
Dr. Cohn and Dr. Grant had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
“A Whole New World” of Perioperative Medicine: The 2018 Update
Monday, April 9, 2:00-2:40 p.m.
Crystal Ballroom G2/C-F
The fluid, evolving nature of perioperative medicine lends itself to a lively literature review and research update, according to Steven L. Cohn, MD, SFHM, a presenter of “ ‘A Whole New World’ of Perioperative Medicine: The 2018 Update” on Monday, April 9, at HM18.
The perioperative medicine update has been a fixture at the SHM annual conference for several years and provides an opportunity to highlight articles that may affect practice, said Dr. Cohn of the University of Miami in an interview. “Our goals are to familiarize the attendees with this new data so they are aware, so they can review the key articles in detail on their own, and so they can then apply the new information in their clinical practices,” he said.
The agenda for the session involves a presentation of 10-15 articles published since HM17. Dr. Cohn and presenter Paul J. Grant, MD, SFHM, the director of the consultative and perioperative medicine program and an associate chief medical information officer at Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, will briefly review the objectives and methods of each study before moving on to focus primarily on the result and conclusions.
“The top take-home message is to try to keep up with the perioperative literature, particularly in cardiology, because the evidence base keeps expanding and changing,” said Dr. Cohn. “This session is designed to deliver new information and also to stimulate the attendees to periodically review the literature on their own during the year,” he said.
This year’s collection of articles will address a range of topics, Dr. Cohn said, but he highlighted several articles “that will be thought provoking and potentially impact clinical practice regarding perioperative surveillance with the new fifth generation high sensitivity troponin assay and management of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery. In particular, results from the MANAGE trial that was presented as a late-breaking trial at the American College of Cardiology meeting in March will be of interest to anyone involved in perioperative medicine,” he noted.
Dr. Cohn and Dr. Grant had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
“A Whole New World” of Perioperative Medicine: The 2018 Update
Monday, April 9, 2:00-2:40 p.m.
Crystal Ballroom G2/C-F
Fun in the Florida sun
Chris Harrington knows that not all the benefits of attending the Society of Hospital Medicine’s annual meetings come from the lectures and courses; there is the formation of friendships that endure.
“I am very grateful to SHM for allowing me the opportunity to accompany Bob to their annual conferences and leadership academies over the years,” said Mrs. Harrington, spouse of former SHM president Robert Harrington Jr., MD, SFHM in an interview.
“It truly has been a rewarding experience for me both as a spouse to travel with my husband and spend time with our friends, and as a health care professional to witness the tremendous growth of SHM membership and the educational and networking opportunities it provides to its members. Watching SHM become even more innovative in universally improving patient care has been an amazing experience as well.
“It is through many SHM conferences that Bob and I have met some wonderful people and have formed many lasting friendships that we will be forever grateful for,” she said.
Mrs. Harrington has some suggestions for activities in Orlando, starting with the Walt Disney World Resort theme parks, which are convenient to the meeting headquarters at the Orlando World Center Marriott. Other popular spots for those with kids (or the young at heart) include SeaWorld Orlando, Legoland Florida, and Universal’s Islands of Adventure, notably the Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey and the Jurassic Park River Adventure attractions.
Within the Orlando World Center Marriott, families can check out the pool complex with its waterslides and slide tower, as well as the kids’ activity center, interactive game room, and table tennis. The resort also offers full-day (10 a.m. to 5 p.m.) or half-day (10 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. or 1:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.) Kid’s World programs and evening Kid’s Night Out programs (6-10 p.m.) for children aged 4-12, so parents get some time to themselves.
For the fitness enthusiasts, “bring your golf clubs, tennis rackets, and running shoes,” Mrs. Harrington said. The resort offers eight tennis courts, volleyball courts, swimming pools for laps, and Hawk’s Landing, a championship golf course that includes a Jack Nicklaus Academy of Golf, should the urge for instruction strike.
Runners, set your alarms for the 5K SHM Fun Run at 6 a.m. on April 10. The Harringtons said they will sign up and be at the start line after a quick visit to the resort’s in-house Starbucks.
“If you want to unwind after a day of meetings and workshops or rejuvenate after a workout, make an appointment (as soon as possible) at the resort’s full service spa,” Mrs. Harrington advised. Spa services include manicures/pedicures, facials, and even couple’s massages, she noted.
Other activities for individuals and families include ZE Segway Tours, the nearby town of Celebration, and the Basilica of the National Shrine of Mary, Queen of the Universe.
Spouses seeking some shopping during meeting time may enjoy nearby outlet malls, the Florida Mall, and the high-end shops of the Mall at Millenia, Mrs Harrington said. One of her favorite “hidden gems” for out-of-town shopping is Park Avenue in Winter Park, which has many boutiques and restaurants. Mount Dora, a small town once known as the Antiques Capital of Florida, includes a wide variety of specialty shops, she noted, and foodies should explore the East End Market, an Orlando neighborhood market and cultural food hub inspired by Central Florida’s local farmers and food artisans.
When it’s time for dining out in Orlando, Mrs. Harrington recommended the Big Fin Seafood Kitchen, a family-owned upscale casual restaurant serving lobster, snow crabs, fresh raw oysters, sushi rolls, steaks, and pasta with an option for outdoor dining on a covered balcony. Christini’s Ristorante Italiano, the most-awarded fine dining Italian restaurant in Orlando for more than 30 years, is consistently popular, and Vines Grille and Wine Bar, “a gem on Orlando’s Restaurant Row,” Mrs. Harrington said, is a great choice for happy hour and features jazz and blues in the evenings starting about 7 p.m.
Finally, “I would recommend meeting some SHM staff members either at registration or between meetings,” Mrs. Harrington advised. “They have been so welcoming to me over the years and have been a great resource and support system. Also, be open to meeting other spouses at group outings, dinners, or networking events whenever you have the opportunity, as they might become a treasured friend,” she said.
Chris Harrington knows that not all the benefits of attending the Society of Hospital Medicine’s annual meetings come from the lectures and courses; there is the formation of friendships that endure.
“I am very grateful to SHM for allowing me the opportunity to accompany Bob to their annual conferences and leadership academies over the years,” said Mrs. Harrington, spouse of former SHM president Robert Harrington Jr., MD, SFHM in an interview.
“It truly has been a rewarding experience for me both as a spouse to travel with my husband and spend time with our friends, and as a health care professional to witness the tremendous growth of SHM membership and the educational and networking opportunities it provides to its members. Watching SHM become even more innovative in universally improving patient care has been an amazing experience as well.
“It is through many SHM conferences that Bob and I have met some wonderful people and have formed many lasting friendships that we will be forever grateful for,” she said.
Mrs. Harrington has some suggestions for activities in Orlando, starting with the Walt Disney World Resort theme parks, which are convenient to the meeting headquarters at the Orlando World Center Marriott. Other popular spots for those with kids (or the young at heart) include SeaWorld Orlando, Legoland Florida, and Universal’s Islands of Adventure, notably the Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey and the Jurassic Park River Adventure attractions.
Within the Orlando World Center Marriott, families can check out the pool complex with its waterslides and slide tower, as well as the kids’ activity center, interactive game room, and table tennis. The resort also offers full-day (10 a.m. to 5 p.m.) or half-day (10 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. or 1:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.) Kid’s World programs and evening Kid’s Night Out programs (6-10 p.m.) for children aged 4-12, so parents get some time to themselves.
For the fitness enthusiasts, “bring your golf clubs, tennis rackets, and running shoes,” Mrs. Harrington said. The resort offers eight tennis courts, volleyball courts, swimming pools for laps, and Hawk’s Landing, a championship golf course that includes a Jack Nicklaus Academy of Golf, should the urge for instruction strike.
Runners, set your alarms for the 5K SHM Fun Run at 6 a.m. on April 10. The Harringtons said they will sign up and be at the start line after a quick visit to the resort’s in-house Starbucks.
“If you want to unwind after a day of meetings and workshops or rejuvenate after a workout, make an appointment (as soon as possible) at the resort’s full service spa,” Mrs. Harrington advised. Spa services include manicures/pedicures, facials, and even couple’s massages, she noted.
Other activities for individuals and families include ZE Segway Tours, the nearby town of Celebration, and the Basilica of the National Shrine of Mary, Queen of the Universe.
Spouses seeking some shopping during meeting time may enjoy nearby outlet malls, the Florida Mall, and the high-end shops of the Mall at Millenia, Mrs Harrington said. One of her favorite “hidden gems” for out-of-town shopping is Park Avenue in Winter Park, which has many boutiques and restaurants. Mount Dora, a small town once known as the Antiques Capital of Florida, includes a wide variety of specialty shops, she noted, and foodies should explore the East End Market, an Orlando neighborhood market and cultural food hub inspired by Central Florida’s local farmers and food artisans.
When it’s time for dining out in Orlando, Mrs. Harrington recommended the Big Fin Seafood Kitchen, a family-owned upscale casual restaurant serving lobster, snow crabs, fresh raw oysters, sushi rolls, steaks, and pasta with an option for outdoor dining on a covered balcony. Christini’s Ristorante Italiano, the most-awarded fine dining Italian restaurant in Orlando for more than 30 years, is consistently popular, and Vines Grille and Wine Bar, “a gem on Orlando’s Restaurant Row,” Mrs. Harrington said, is a great choice for happy hour and features jazz and blues in the evenings starting about 7 p.m.
Finally, “I would recommend meeting some SHM staff members either at registration or between meetings,” Mrs. Harrington advised. “They have been so welcoming to me over the years and have been a great resource and support system. Also, be open to meeting other spouses at group outings, dinners, or networking events whenever you have the opportunity, as they might become a treasured friend,” she said.
Chris Harrington knows that not all the benefits of attending the Society of Hospital Medicine’s annual meetings come from the lectures and courses; there is the formation of friendships that endure.
“I am very grateful to SHM for allowing me the opportunity to accompany Bob to their annual conferences and leadership academies over the years,” said Mrs. Harrington, spouse of former SHM president Robert Harrington Jr., MD, SFHM in an interview.
“It truly has been a rewarding experience for me both as a spouse to travel with my husband and spend time with our friends, and as a health care professional to witness the tremendous growth of SHM membership and the educational and networking opportunities it provides to its members. Watching SHM become even more innovative in universally improving patient care has been an amazing experience as well.
“It is through many SHM conferences that Bob and I have met some wonderful people and have formed many lasting friendships that we will be forever grateful for,” she said.
Mrs. Harrington has some suggestions for activities in Orlando, starting with the Walt Disney World Resort theme parks, which are convenient to the meeting headquarters at the Orlando World Center Marriott. Other popular spots for those with kids (or the young at heart) include SeaWorld Orlando, Legoland Florida, and Universal’s Islands of Adventure, notably the Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey and the Jurassic Park River Adventure attractions.
Within the Orlando World Center Marriott, families can check out the pool complex with its waterslides and slide tower, as well as the kids’ activity center, interactive game room, and table tennis. The resort also offers full-day (10 a.m. to 5 p.m.) or half-day (10 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. or 1:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.) Kid’s World programs and evening Kid’s Night Out programs (6-10 p.m.) for children aged 4-12, so parents get some time to themselves.
For the fitness enthusiasts, “bring your golf clubs, tennis rackets, and running shoes,” Mrs. Harrington said. The resort offers eight tennis courts, volleyball courts, swimming pools for laps, and Hawk’s Landing, a championship golf course that includes a Jack Nicklaus Academy of Golf, should the urge for instruction strike.
Runners, set your alarms for the 5K SHM Fun Run at 6 a.m. on April 10. The Harringtons said they will sign up and be at the start line after a quick visit to the resort’s in-house Starbucks.
“If you want to unwind after a day of meetings and workshops or rejuvenate after a workout, make an appointment (as soon as possible) at the resort’s full service spa,” Mrs. Harrington advised. Spa services include manicures/pedicures, facials, and even couple’s massages, she noted.
Other activities for individuals and families include ZE Segway Tours, the nearby town of Celebration, and the Basilica of the National Shrine of Mary, Queen of the Universe.
Spouses seeking some shopping during meeting time may enjoy nearby outlet malls, the Florida Mall, and the high-end shops of the Mall at Millenia, Mrs Harrington said. One of her favorite “hidden gems” for out-of-town shopping is Park Avenue in Winter Park, which has many boutiques and restaurants. Mount Dora, a small town once known as the Antiques Capital of Florida, includes a wide variety of specialty shops, she noted, and foodies should explore the East End Market, an Orlando neighborhood market and cultural food hub inspired by Central Florida’s local farmers and food artisans.
When it’s time for dining out in Orlando, Mrs. Harrington recommended the Big Fin Seafood Kitchen, a family-owned upscale casual restaurant serving lobster, snow crabs, fresh raw oysters, sushi rolls, steaks, and pasta with an option for outdoor dining on a covered balcony. Christini’s Ristorante Italiano, the most-awarded fine dining Italian restaurant in Orlando for more than 30 years, is consistently popular, and Vines Grille and Wine Bar, “a gem on Orlando’s Restaurant Row,” Mrs. Harrington said, is a great choice for happy hour and features jazz and blues in the evenings starting about 7 p.m.
Finally, “I would recommend meeting some SHM staff members either at registration or between meetings,” Mrs. Harrington advised. “They have been so welcoming to me over the years and have been a great resource and support system. Also, be open to meeting other spouses at group outings, dinners, or networking events whenever you have the opportunity, as they might become a treasured friend,” she said.
Top hospital heart failure performance translates to longer survival
ORLANDO – Hospitals in the first quartile of short-term performance in treating heart failure patients had higher long-term survival rates for those patients, based on data from 317 hospitals that participated in a voluntary quality improvement program.
The burden of heart failure remains substantial in the United States, and health policies are increasingly focused on improving care for heart failure patients, said Ambarish Pandey, MD, of the University of Texas, Dallas, in a presentation at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
The researchers assessed hospital performance based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMR) in hospitals participating in the Get With the Guidelines–Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) registry, using a hierarchical, logistic regression model to calculate hospital-specific 30-day RSMRs.
Get With the Guidelines is a voluntary, observational quality improvement program that has been linked with CMS to capture long-term follow-up data, Dr. Pandey explained.
The study included 106,304 heart failure patients older than 65 years at 317 GWTG hospitals across the United States during 2005-2013. The hospitals were divided into performance quartiles based on 30-day RSMR. The 30-day RSMRs were 8.6%, 9.4%, 9.9%, and 10.7% in the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively.
There was a strong association between the top-performing hospitals and long-term survival rates for the patients that persisted beyond 30 days, said Dr. Pandey. The mortality rates after 5 years were 75.6%, 76.2%, 76.9%, and 79.6%, in the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively.
The hospitals in the first quartile were more likely than those in the fourth quartile to have primary percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities (80% vs. 73%), in-house cardiac surgery (66% vs. 57%), and a heart transplant center (13% vs. 2%).
In addition, the hospitals in the highest quartile had higher rates of adherence than those in the lowest quartile to guideline-directed heart failure therapies, including evidence-based beta-blocker use, ACE inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker use, postdischarge heart failure follow-up, implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement prior to discharge, and cardiac resynchronization therapy prior to discharge.The study was limited by a possible lack of generalizability to hospitals not participating in the GWTG program, Dr. Pandey said. In addition, “we cannot establish causation between hospital performance based on 30-day RSMR and long-term survival.”
However, the long-term survival advantage for heart failure patients treated at hospitals with the highest measures of short-term performance suggests that the 30-day RSMR could be used as an incentive for quality care and the improvement of long-term outcomes, he said.
Dr. Pandey had no financial conflicts to disclose. The Get With the Guidelines–Heart Failure program is supported by the American Heart Association, and has been previously funded by Medtronic, GlaxoSmithKline, Ortho-McNeil, and the AHA Pharmaceutical Roundtable. The findings were published simultaneously in JAMA Cardiology (2018 Mar 12. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0579).
SOURCE: Pandy A. ACC 2018.
ORLANDO – Hospitals in the first quartile of short-term performance in treating heart failure patients had higher long-term survival rates for those patients, based on data from 317 hospitals that participated in a voluntary quality improvement program.
The burden of heart failure remains substantial in the United States, and health policies are increasingly focused on improving care for heart failure patients, said Ambarish Pandey, MD, of the University of Texas, Dallas, in a presentation at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
The researchers assessed hospital performance based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMR) in hospitals participating in the Get With the Guidelines–Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) registry, using a hierarchical, logistic regression model to calculate hospital-specific 30-day RSMRs.
Get With the Guidelines is a voluntary, observational quality improvement program that has been linked with CMS to capture long-term follow-up data, Dr. Pandey explained.
The study included 106,304 heart failure patients older than 65 years at 317 GWTG hospitals across the United States during 2005-2013. The hospitals were divided into performance quartiles based on 30-day RSMR. The 30-day RSMRs were 8.6%, 9.4%, 9.9%, and 10.7% in the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively.
There was a strong association between the top-performing hospitals and long-term survival rates for the patients that persisted beyond 30 days, said Dr. Pandey. The mortality rates after 5 years were 75.6%, 76.2%, 76.9%, and 79.6%, in the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively.
The hospitals in the first quartile were more likely than those in the fourth quartile to have primary percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities (80% vs. 73%), in-house cardiac surgery (66% vs. 57%), and a heart transplant center (13% vs. 2%).
In addition, the hospitals in the highest quartile had higher rates of adherence than those in the lowest quartile to guideline-directed heart failure therapies, including evidence-based beta-blocker use, ACE inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker use, postdischarge heart failure follow-up, implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement prior to discharge, and cardiac resynchronization therapy prior to discharge.The study was limited by a possible lack of generalizability to hospitals not participating in the GWTG program, Dr. Pandey said. In addition, “we cannot establish causation between hospital performance based on 30-day RSMR and long-term survival.”
However, the long-term survival advantage for heart failure patients treated at hospitals with the highest measures of short-term performance suggests that the 30-day RSMR could be used as an incentive for quality care and the improvement of long-term outcomes, he said.
Dr. Pandey had no financial conflicts to disclose. The Get With the Guidelines–Heart Failure program is supported by the American Heart Association, and has been previously funded by Medtronic, GlaxoSmithKline, Ortho-McNeil, and the AHA Pharmaceutical Roundtable. The findings were published simultaneously in JAMA Cardiology (2018 Mar 12. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0579).
SOURCE: Pandy A. ACC 2018.
ORLANDO – Hospitals in the first quartile of short-term performance in treating heart failure patients had higher long-term survival rates for those patients, based on data from 317 hospitals that participated in a voluntary quality improvement program.
The burden of heart failure remains substantial in the United States, and health policies are increasingly focused on improving care for heart failure patients, said Ambarish Pandey, MD, of the University of Texas, Dallas, in a presentation at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
The researchers assessed hospital performance based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMR) in hospitals participating in the Get With the Guidelines–Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) registry, using a hierarchical, logistic regression model to calculate hospital-specific 30-day RSMRs.
Get With the Guidelines is a voluntary, observational quality improvement program that has been linked with CMS to capture long-term follow-up data, Dr. Pandey explained.
The study included 106,304 heart failure patients older than 65 years at 317 GWTG hospitals across the United States during 2005-2013. The hospitals were divided into performance quartiles based on 30-day RSMR. The 30-day RSMRs were 8.6%, 9.4%, 9.9%, and 10.7% in the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively.
There was a strong association between the top-performing hospitals and long-term survival rates for the patients that persisted beyond 30 days, said Dr. Pandey. The mortality rates after 5 years were 75.6%, 76.2%, 76.9%, and 79.6%, in the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively.
The hospitals in the first quartile were more likely than those in the fourth quartile to have primary percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities (80% vs. 73%), in-house cardiac surgery (66% vs. 57%), and a heart transplant center (13% vs. 2%).
In addition, the hospitals in the highest quartile had higher rates of adherence than those in the lowest quartile to guideline-directed heart failure therapies, including evidence-based beta-blocker use, ACE inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker use, postdischarge heart failure follow-up, implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement prior to discharge, and cardiac resynchronization therapy prior to discharge.The study was limited by a possible lack of generalizability to hospitals not participating in the GWTG program, Dr. Pandey said. In addition, “we cannot establish causation between hospital performance based on 30-day RSMR and long-term survival.”
However, the long-term survival advantage for heart failure patients treated at hospitals with the highest measures of short-term performance suggests that the 30-day RSMR could be used as an incentive for quality care and the improvement of long-term outcomes, he said.
Dr. Pandey had no financial conflicts to disclose. The Get With the Guidelines–Heart Failure program is supported by the American Heart Association, and has been previously funded by Medtronic, GlaxoSmithKline, Ortho-McNeil, and the AHA Pharmaceutical Roundtable. The findings were published simultaneously in JAMA Cardiology (2018 Mar 12. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0579).
SOURCE: Pandy A. ACC 2018.
REPORTING FROM ACC 2018
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Hospitals in the lowest quartile had a 22% higher 5-year mortality rate for heart failure patients compared with the highest quartile hospitals.
Study details: The data come from 106,304 heart failure patients admitted to 317 hospitals participating in a voluntary quality improvement program.
Disclosures: Dr. Pandey had no financial conflicts to disclose. The Get With the Guidelines–Heart Failure program is supported by the American Heart Association, and has been previously funded by Medtronic, GlaxoSmithKline, Ortho-McNeil, and the AHA Pharmaceutical Roundtable.
Source: Pandey A. ACC 2018.
VIDEO: PFO closure device 100% effective against future strokes
ORLANDO – Closing a patent foramen ovale reduced the incidence of stroke and other adverse events in patients at increased risk the DEFENSE-PRO trial.
“The potential association between patent foramen ovale [PFO] and cryptogenic stroke has been a controversial issue for decades,” Jae Kwan Song, MD, of Asan Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea, said in an interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
In this study, 60 patients with high-risk PFOs (at least 2 mm) were randomized to receive anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications alone, and 60 were randomized to medication plus implantation of the Amplatzer PFO closure device.
The device implantation was successful for all patients in the device group. The primary endpoint was a combination of stroke, vascular death, and major bleeding within 2 years of follow-up after the procedure.
After an average follow-up of 2.8 years, none of the patients in the device group and six (10%) of patients in the medication-only group experienced a primary endpoint event. The events in the medication-only group included five cases of ischemic stroke, two cases of TIMI-defined major bleeding, one cerebral hemorrhage, and one transient ischemic attack.
Nonfatal procedural complications included two cases of atrial fibrillation, one case of pericardial effusion, and one pseudoaneurysm.
The average age of the patients was 54 years in the medication-only group and 49 years in the device group, and roughly one-third of the patients in each group were male. The baseline clinical characteristics, including the presence of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and high cholesterol, were similar between the groups.
“We should consider two things before clinical decision of device closure,” Dr. Song said. First, exclude other causes of cryptogenic stroke; and second, conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the PFO to determine which patients are at highest risk and would be most likely to benefit from the procedure, he said.
To better determine which patients would benefit from the device implantation, Dr. Song and his colleagues used imaging to review data on the size and features of the PFO; patients with evidence of an atrial septal aneurysm or hypermobility (defined as a septal excursion 10 mm or larger) were deemed at especially high risk.
Dr. Song said that the next steps for research on management of PFOs include determining which medications are most effective in patients treated with medication alone, as well as clarifying the process of patient selection for device use based on PFO morphology.
The study was terminated early because of several factors, including low patient recruitment and the decision not to deny patients the closure treatment because of its demonstrated effectiveness, Dr. Song noted.
The study was supported by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation in Seoul, South Korea. Dr. Song had no financial conflicts to disclose. The findings were published simultaneously in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.046).
SOURCE: Song J. ACC 2018.
ORLANDO – Closing a patent foramen ovale reduced the incidence of stroke and other adverse events in patients at increased risk the DEFENSE-PRO trial.
“The potential association between patent foramen ovale [PFO] and cryptogenic stroke has been a controversial issue for decades,” Jae Kwan Song, MD, of Asan Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea, said in an interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
In this study, 60 patients with high-risk PFOs (at least 2 mm) were randomized to receive anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications alone, and 60 were randomized to medication plus implantation of the Amplatzer PFO closure device.
The device implantation was successful for all patients in the device group. The primary endpoint was a combination of stroke, vascular death, and major bleeding within 2 years of follow-up after the procedure.
After an average follow-up of 2.8 years, none of the patients in the device group and six (10%) of patients in the medication-only group experienced a primary endpoint event. The events in the medication-only group included five cases of ischemic stroke, two cases of TIMI-defined major bleeding, one cerebral hemorrhage, and one transient ischemic attack.
Nonfatal procedural complications included two cases of atrial fibrillation, one case of pericardial effusion, and one pseudoaneurysm.
The average age of the patients was 54 years in the medication-only group and 49 years in the device group, and roughly one-third of the patients in each group were male. The baseline clinical characteristics, including the presence of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and high cholesterol, were similar between the groups.
“We should consider two things before clinical decision of device closure,” Dr. Song said. First, exclude other causes of cryptogenic stroke; and second, conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the PFO to determine which patients are at highest risk and would be most likely to benefit from the procedure, he said.
To better determine which patients would benefit from the device implantation, Dr. Song and his colleagues used imaging to review data on the size and features of the PFO; patients with evidence of an atrial septal aneurysm or hypermobility (defined as a septal excursion 10 mm or larger) were deemed at especially high risk.
Dr. Song said that the next steps for research on management of PFOs include determining which medications are most effective in patients treated with medication alone, as well as clarifying the process of patient selection for device use based on PFO morphology.
The study was terminated early because of several factors, including low patient recruitment and the decision not to deny patients the closure treatment because of its demonstrated effectiveness, Dr. Song noted.
The study was supported by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation in Seoul, South Korea. Dr. Song had no financial conflicts to disclose. The findings were published simultaneously in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.046).
SOURCE: Song J. ACC 2018.
ORLANDO – Closing a patent foramen ovale reduced the incidence of stroke and other adverse events in patients at increased risk the DEFENSE-PRO trial.
“The potential association between patent foramen ovale [PFO] and cryptogenic stroke has been a controversial issue for decades,” Jae Kwan Song, MD, of Asan Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea, said in an interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
In this study, 60 patients with high-risk PFOs (at least 2 mm) were randomized to receive anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications alone, and 60 were randomized to medication plus implantation of the Amplatzer PFO closure device.
The device implantation was successful for all patients in the device group. The primary endpoint was a combination of stroke, vascular death, and major bleeding within 2 years of follow-up after the procedure.
After an average follow-up of 2.8 years, none of the patients in the device group and six (10%) of patients in the medication-only group experienced a primary endpoint event. The events in the medication-only group included five cases of ischemic stroke, two cases of TIMI-defined major bleeding, one cerebral hemorrhage, and one transient ischemic attack.
Nonfatal procedural complications included two cases of atrial fibrillation, one case of pericardial effusion, and one pseudoaneurysm.
The average age of the patients was 54 years in the medication-only group and 49 years in the device group, and roughly one-third of the patients in each group were male. The baseline clinical characteristics, including the presence of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and high cholesterol, were similar between the groups.
“We should consider two things before clinical decision of device closure,” Dr. Song said. First, exclude other causes of cryptogenic stroke; and second, conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the PFO to determine which patients are at highest risk and would be most likely to benefit from the procedure, he said.
To better determine which patients would benefit from the device implantation, Dr. Song and his colleagues used imaging to review data on the size and features of the PFO; patients with evidence of an atrial septal aneurysm or hypermobility (defined as a septal excursion 10 mm or larger) were deemed at especially high risk.
Dr. Song said that the next steps for research on management of PFOs include determining which medications are most effective in patients treated with medication alone, as well as clarifying the process of patient selection for device use based on PFO morphology.
The study was terminated early because of several factors, including low patient recruitment and the decision not to deny patients the closure treatment because of its demonstrated effectiveness, Dr. Song noted.
The study was supported by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation in Seoul, South Korea. Dr. Song had no financial conflicts to disclose. The findings were published simultaneously in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.046).
SOURCE: Song J. ACC 2018.
REPORTING FROM ACC 18
Key clinical point: Closure of patent foramen ovale resulted in no adverse events or recurrent strokes during 2 years’ follow-up.
Major finding: No adverse event or strokes occurred in the device-plus-medication group, compared with six events in the medication-only group.
Study details: The data come from DEFENSE-PFO, a randomized trial of 120 adults with a history of cryptogenic stroke and high-risk PFO.
Disclosures: DEFENSE-PFO was supported by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation in Seoul, South Korea. Dr. Song had no financial conflicts to disclose.
Source: Song J. ACC 2018.
Genetic Pap tests catch more cancers
A Pap test combined with assays for gene mutations showed an 81% and 33% sensitivity or identifying endometrial and ovarian cancer, respectively.
In a study published in Science Translational Medicine, Yuxuan Wang, MD, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and her colleagues used a polymerase chain reaction–based test known as PapSEEK to examine Pap brush samples from 382 women with endometrial cancer, 245 women with ovarian cancer, and 714 women without cancer.
Overall, 81% of the endometrial cancer patients and 29% of the ovarian cancer patients had detectable mutations on Pap smears taken with a Pap brush. Among endometrial cancer patients, the genetic test identified mutations in 78% of patients with early-stage disease and 89% of those with late-stage disease. Among ovarian cancer patients, the genetic test identified 28% of patients with early-stage disease and 30% of those with late-stage disease.
The investigators also used the genetic test on Tao brush samples from the intrauterine cavity from a subset of 123 patients with endometrial cancer, 51 with ovarian cancer, and 125 controls and identified genetic mutations in 93% and 45% of endometrial and ovarian cancers, respectively.
The results demonstrate the potential of mutation-based diagnostic testing, and samples taken with the Tao brush may be especially helpful for ovarian cancers, especially in samples combining Pap and plasma sample data, the researchers said.
The study was limited by several factors including its retrospective design and having a study population confined to women with known cancers, the researchers noted. More research is needed, but results suggest the potential for DNA analysis to catch cancers early in a screening setting, they said. “Our study lays the foundation for evaluating PapSEEK in a large prospective study,” ideally including patients at high risk for gynecologic cancers, they added.
The study was funded by multiple sources including the Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research, the National Institutes of Health, and the Stand Up to Cancer Colorectal Dream Team Translational Research Grant. Dr. Wang and several coauthors disclosed patent, equity, and royalty interest in technologies discussed in the paper. Four coauthors are cofounders of and stockholders in PapGene, which has licensed technologies related to the work described in the paper.
SOURCE: Wang Y et al. Sci Transl Med. 2018 Mar 21;10(433):eaap8793.
A Pap test combined with assays for gene mutations showed an 81% and 33% sensitivity or identifying endometrial and ovarian cancer, respectively.
In a study published in Science Translational Medicine, Yuxuan Wang, MD, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and her colleagues used a polymerase chain reaction–based test known as PapSEEK to examine Pap brush samples from 382 women with endometrial cancer, 245 women with ovarian cancer, and 714 women without cancer.
Overall, 81% of the endometrial cancer patients and 29% of the ovarian cancer patients had detectable mutations on Pap smears taken with a Pap brush. Among endometrial cancer patients, the genetic test identified mutations in 78% of patients with early-stage disease and 89% of those with late-stage disease. Among ovarian cancer patients, the genetic test identified 28% of patients with early-stage disease and 30% of those with late-stage disease.
The investigators also used the genetic test on Tao brush samples from the intrauterine cavity from a subset of 123 patients with endometrial cancer, 51 with ovarian cancer, and 125 controls and identified genetic mutations in 93% and 45% of endometrial and ovarian cancers, respectively.
The results demonstrate the potential of mutation-based diagnostic testing, and samples taken with the Tao brush may be especially helpful for ovarian cancers, especially in samples combining Pap and plasma sample data, the researchers said.
The study was limited by several factors including its retrospective design and having a study population confined to women with known cancers, the researchers noted. More research is needed, but results suggest the potential for DNA analysis to catch cancers early in a screening setting, they said. “Our study lays the foundation for evaluating PapSEEK in a large prospective study,” ideally including patients at high risk for gynecologic cancers, they added.
The study was funded by multiple sources including the Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research, the National Institutes of Health, and the Stand Up to Cancer Colorectal Dream Team Translational Research Grant. Dr. Wang and several coauthors disclosed patent, equity, and royalty interest in technologies discussed in the paper. Four coauthors are cofounders of and stockholders in PapGene, which has licensed technologies related to the work described in the paper.
SOURCE: Wang Y et al. Sci Transl Med. 2018 Mar 21;10(433):eaap8793.
A Pap test combined with assays for gene mutations showed an 81% and 33% sensitivity or identifying endometrial and ovarian cancer, respectively.
In a study published in Science Translational Medicine, Yuxuan Wang, MD, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and her colleagues used a polymerase chain reaction–based test known as PapSEEK to examine Pap brush samples from 382 women with endometrial cancer, 245 women with ovarian cancer, and 714 women without cancer.
Overall, 81% of the endometrial cancer patients and 29% of the ovarian cancer patients had detectable mutations on Pap smears taken with a Pap brush. Among endometrial cancer patients, the genetic test identified mutations in 78% of patients with early-stage disease and 89% of those with late-stage disease. Among ovarian cancer patients, the genetic test identified 28% of patients with early-stage disease and 30% of those with late-stage disease.
The investigators also used the genetic test on Tao brush samples from the intrauterine cavity from a subset of 123 patients with endometrial cancer, 51 with ovarian cancer, and 125 controls and identified genetic mutations in 93% and 45% of endometrial and ovarian cancers, respectively.
The results demonstrate the potential of mutation-based diagnostic testing, and samples taken with the Tao brush may be especially helpful for ovarian cancers, especially in samples combining Pap and plasma sample data, the researchers said.
The study was limited by several factors including its retrospective design and having a study population confined to women with known cancers, the researchers noted. More research is needed, but results suggest the potential for DNA analysis to catch cancers early in a screening setting, they said. “Our study lays the foundation for evaluating PapSEEK in a large prospective study,” ideally including patients at high risk for gynecologic cancers, they added.
The study was funded by multiple sources including the Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research, the National Institutes of Health, and the Stand Up to Cancer Colorectal Dream Team Translational Research Grant. Dr. Wang and several coauthors disclosed patent, equity, and royalty interest in technologies discussed in the paper. Four coauthors are cofounders of and stockholders in PapGene, which has licensed technologies related to the work described in the paper.
SOURCE: Wang Y et al. Sci Transl Med. 2018 Mar 21;10(433):eaap8793.
FROM SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Key clinical point: Genetics-based Pap test identified endometrial and ovarian cancers.
Major finding: Pap brush samples identified mutations in 81% of women with endometrial cancer and 29% of women with ovarian cancer.
Study details: Analysis of 1,915 Pap samples from 1,658 women; 1,002 were healthy controls, while 656 had gynecologic cancer.
Disclosures: The study was funded by multiple sources including the Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research, the National Institutes of Health, and the Stand Up to Cancer Colorectal Dream Team Translational Research Grant. Dr. Wang and several coauthors disclosed patent, equity, and royalty interest in technologies discussed in the paper. Four coauthors are cofounders of and stockholders in PapGene, which has licensed technologies related to the work described in the paper.
Source: Wang Y et al. Sci Transl Med. 2018 Mar 21;10(433):eaap8793.
Counsel children and young adults on skin cancer prevention
(USPSTF). The recommendations, published online March 20 in JAMA, advise clinicians to counsel young adults, children, and parents of young children who are aged 6 months to 24 years and have fair skin types about skin cancer prevention. Counseling for individuals aged 24 years and older should be based on a clinician’s assessment of patient risk.
The recommendations target asymptomatic individuals with no history of skin cancer who might be likely to sunburn easily, wrote David C. Grossman, MD, of Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, the corresponding author of the USPSTF recommendation statement, and his associates.
The task force found adequate (grade B) evidence to support behavioral counseling for children and young adults aged 6 months to 24 years with no notable risk of harm from this intervention. The task force gave a grade C recommendation for routine skin cancer counseling for adults older than 24 years, citing a small net benefit. In addition, the USPSTF found insufficient evidence (I statement) to evaluate the risks versus benefits of counseling adults about skin self-examination as a way to reduce skin cancer risk.
In the evidence report, lead author Nora B. Henrikson, PhD, of Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, and her colleagues addressed five topics: the effects of skin cancer prevention counseling on short- and long-term outcomes, the effects of primary care counseling interventions on skin cancer prevention behavior, the association between skin self-examination and skin cancer outcomes, the potential harms of counseling interventions, and the potential harms of skin self-examinations.
“Small to moderate effects of behavioral interventions on increased sun protection behaviors were observed in studies of all age groups, though overall, adult trial results were mixed and fewer studies demonstrated an intervention effect,” the researchers said.
The evidence review was limited by several factors including a focus on primary care intervention only and an exclusion of skin cancer survivors, the researchers noted. Although evidence does not show that sunburns are less frequent as a result of interventions, behavioral intervention can improve sun protection behavior, they said. However, intervention in adults “may lead to increased skin procedures without detecting additional atypical nevi or skin cancers,” they noted.
The recommendations are consistent with the draft recommendations published in 2017 and expand the recommendations from 2012 that advised counseling for individuals aged 10-24 years.
The research was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The authors had no financial conflicts to disclose.
SOURCE: Grossman DC et al. JAMA. 2018;319(11):1134-42.
The term “fair skin types” as used in the USPSTF recommendations is not necessarily helpful in identifying individuals who could benefit from skin cancer prevention counseling, June K. Robinson, MD, and Nina G. Jablonski, PhD, wrote in an accompanying editorial (JAMA. 2018;319[11]:1101-2). Hair and eye color do not predict sun sensitivity, and in general, men and individuals with darker skin don’t think they are at risk for skin cancer even when they sunburn, they noted.
“The terminology that is used by investigators and then incorporated into the USPSTF evidence base needs to evolve to include all persons at risk, without disenfranchising portions of the diverse U.S. population,” they said. In addition to skin type, physicians need to evaluate a patient’s melanoma risk based on lifestyle factors, such as time spent outdoors, photosensitizing medications, and sun protection habits, they added, but primary care clinicians often lack the time to offer personalized sun protection counseling.
“It would be better to encourage people to check the UV Index daily – or consider a mobile application that automatically provides it – and plan outdoor activities, especially physical activities, to be sun safe,” they said. In addition, individuals may be more likely to manage skin cancer risk with a mix of supportive messages via social media to augment in-person counseling from a clinician; furthermore, “normative approval by friends and peers can have a strong reinforcing influence on sun safety behaviors, particularly among youth, who are at a vulnerable age for acquiring melanoma risk,” they emphasized.
Dr. Robinson is a research professor of dermatology at Northwestern University, Chicago, and is the editor of JAMA Dermatology. She is supported in part by the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Jablonski is a professor of anthropology at Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Dr. Robinson had no financial conflicts to disclose; Dr. Jablonski has served on the scientific advisory board of the L’Oreal Group.
The term “fair skin types” as used in the USPSTF recommendations is not necessarily helpful in identifying individuals who could benefit from skin cancer prevention counseling, June K. Robinson, MD, and Nina G. Jablonski, PhD, wrote in an accompanying editorial (JAMA. 2018;319[11]:1101-2). Hair and eye color do not predict sun sensitivity, and in general, men and individuals with darker skin don’t think they are at risk for skin cancer even when they sunburn, they noted.
“The terminology that is used by investigators and then incorporated into the USPSTF evidence base needs to evolve to include all persons at risk, without disenfranchising portions of the diverse U.S. population,” they said. In addition to skin type, physicians need to evaluate a patient’s melanoma risk based on lifestyle factors, such as time spent outdoors, photosensitizing medications, and sun protection habits, they added, but primary care clinicians often lack the time to offer personalized sun protection counseling.
“It would be better to encourage people to check the UV Index daily – or consider a mobile application that automatically provides it – and plan outdoor activities, especially physical activities, to be sun safe,” they said. In addition, individuals may be more likely to manage skin cancer risk with a mix of supportive messages via social media to augment in-person counseling from a clinician; furthermore, “normative approval by friends and peers can have a strong reinforcing influence on sun safety behaviors, particularly among youth, who are at a vulnerable age for acquiring melanoma risk,” they emphasized.
Dr. Robinson is a research professor of dermatology at Northwestern University, Chicago, and is the editor of JAMA Dermatology. She is supported in part by the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Jablonski is a professor of anthropology at Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Dr. Robinson had no financial conflicts to disclose; Dr. Jablonski has served on the scientific advisory board of the L’Oreal Group.
The term “fair skin types” as used in the USPSTF recommendations is not necessarily helpful in identifying individuals who could benefit from skin cancer prevention counseling, June K. Robinson, MD, and Nina G. Jablonski, PhD, wrote in an accompanying editorial (JAMA. 2018;319[11]:1101-2). Hair and eye color do not predict sun sensitivity, and in general, men and individuals with darker skin don’t think they are at risk for skin cancer even when they sunburn, they noted.
“The terminology that is used by investigators and then incorporated into the USPSTF evidence base needs to evolve to include all persons at risk, without disenfranchising portions of the diverse U.S. population,” they said. In addition to skin type, physicians need to evaluate a patient’s melanoma risk based on lifestyle factors, such as time spent outdoors, photosensitizing medications, and sun protection habits, they added, but primary care clinicians often lack the time to offer personalized sun protection counseling.
“It would be better to encourage people to check the UV Index daily – or consider a mobile application that automatically provides it – and plan outdoor activities, especially physical activities, to be sun safe,” they said. In addition, individuals may be more likely to manage skin cancer risk with a mix of supportive messages via social media to augment in-person counseling from a clinician; furthermore, “normative approval by friends and peers can have a strong reinforcing influence on sun safety behaviors, particularly among youth, who are at a vulnerable age for acquiring melanoma risk,” they emphasized.
Dr. Robinson is a research professor of dermatology at Northwestern University, Chicago, and is the editor of JAMA Dermatology. She is supported in part by the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Jablonski is a professor of anthropology at Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Dr. Robinson had no financial conflicts to disclose; Dr. Jablonski has served on the scientific advisory board of the L’Oreal Group.
(USPSTF). The recommendations, published online March 20 in JAMA, advise clinicians to counsel young adults, children, and parents of young children who are aged 6 months to 24 years and have fair skin types about skin cancer prevention. Counseling for individuals aged 24 years and older should be based on a clinician’s assessment of patient risk.
The recommendations target asymptomatic individuals with no history of skin cancer who might be likely to sunburn easily, wrote David C. Grossman, MD, of Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, the corresponding author of the USPSTF recommendation statement, and his associates.
The task force found adequate (grade B) evidence to support behavioral counseling for children and young adults aged 6 months to 24 years with no notable risk of harm from this intervention. The task force gave a grade C recommendation for routine skin cancer counseling for adults older than 24 years, citing a small net benefit. In addition, the USPSTF found insufficient evidence (I statement) to evaluate the risks versus benefits of counseling adults about skin self-examination as a way to reduce skin cancer risk.
In the evidence report, lead author Nora B. Henrikson, PhD, of Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, and her colleagues addressed five topics: the effects of skin cancer prevention counseling on short- and long-term outcomes, the effects of primary care counseling interventions on skin cancer prevention behavior, the association between skin self-examination and skin cancer outcomes, the potential harms of counseling interventions, and the potential harms of skin self-examinations.
“Small to moderate effects of behavioral interventions on increased sun protection behaviors were observed in studies of all age groups, though overall, adult trial results were mixed and fewer studies demonstrated an intervention effect,” the researchers said.
The evidence review was limited by several factors including a focus on primary care intervention only and an exclusion of skin cancer survivors, the researchers noted. Although evidence does not show that sunburns are less frequent as a result of interventions, behavioral intervention can improve sun protection behavior, they said. However, intervention in adults “may lead to increased skin procedures without detecting additional atypical nevi or skin cancers,” they noted.
The recommendations are consistent with the draft recommendations published in 2017 and expand the recommendations from 2012 that advised counseling for individuals aged 10-24 years.
The research was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The authors had no financial conflicts to disclose.
SOURCE: Grossman DC et al. JAMA. 2018;319(11):1134-42.
(USPSTF). The recommendations, published online March 20 in JAMA, advise clinicians to counsel young adults, children, and parents of young children who are aged 6 months to 24 years and have fair skin types about skin cancer prevention. Counseling for individuals aged 24 years and older should be based on a clinician’s assessment of patient risk.
The recommendations target asymptomatic individuals with no history of skin cancer who might be likely to sunburn easily, wrote David C. Grossman, MD, of Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, the corresponding author of the USPSTF recommendation statement, and his associates.
The task force found adequate (grade B) evidence to support behavioral counseling for children and young adults aged 6 months to 24 years with no notable risk of harm from this intervention. The task force gave a grade C recommendation for routine skin cancer counseling for adults older than 24 years, citing a small net benefit. In addition, the USPSTF found insufficient evidence (I statement) to evaluate the risks versus benefits of counseling adults about skin self-examination as a way to reduce skin cancer risk.
In the evidence report, lead author Nora B. Henrikson, PhD, of Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, and her colleagues addressed five topics: the effects of skin cancer prevention counseling on short- and long-term outcomes, the effects of primary care counseling interventions on skin cancer prevention behavior, the association between skin self-examination and skin cancer outcomes, the potential harms of counseling interventions, and the potential harms of skin self-examinations.
“Small to moderate effects of behavioral interventions on increased sun protection behaviors were observed in studies of all age groups, though overall, adult trial results were mixed and fewer studies demonstrated an intervention effect,” the researchers said.
The evidence review was limited by several factors including a focus on primary care intervention only and an exclusion of skin cancer survivors, the researchers noted. Although evidence does not show that sunburns are less frequent as a result of interventions, behavioral intervention can improve sun protection behavior, they said. However, intervention in adults “may lead to increased skin procedures without detecting additional atypical nevi or skin cancers,” they noted.
The recommendations are consistent with the draft recommendations published in 2017 and expand the recommendations from 2012 that advised counseling for individuals aged 10-24 years.
The research was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The authors had no financial conflicts to disclose.
SOURCE: Grossman DC et al. JAMA. 2018;319(11):1134-42.
FROM JAMA
Key clinical point: Moderate evidence supports behavioral counseling to help reduce skin cancer risk in children and young adults.
Major finding: One trial that included 1,356 adults showed no difference in the number of skin cancers and atypical nevi between a control group and patients who received counseling to encourage skin examination.
Study details: The evidence review included 21 trials in 27 publications for a total of 20,561 individuals.
Disclosures: The review was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Source: Grossman DC et al. JAMA. 2018;319(11):1134-42.
SGLT2 inhibitors cut cardiovascular outcomes regardless of region
ORLANDO – Cardiovascular outcomes were significantly more favorable with sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors compared with other glucose-lowering drugs, according to data from more than 400,000 type 2 diabetes patients in the Middle East, Asia Pacific, and North America.
Data on cardiovascular outcomes from diabetes treatments in patients outside the United States and Europe are limited, said Mikhail Kosiborod, MD, of Saint Luke’s Mid-America Heart Institute and University of Missouri–Kansas City.
In fact, most patients with type 2 diabetes reside in the Asia-Pacific and the Middle East, he said in a presentation at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
Dr. Kosiborod was involved in a previous large pharmaco-epidemiologic study known as the Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiovascular Outcomes in New Users of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors (CVD-REAL), that showed SGLT2 inhibitor effects in a broad population of type 2 diabetes patients, but that study included only patients from Europe and North America, and focused on just two outcomes: all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure.
The study population included adults aged 18 years and older diagnosed with type 2 diabetes; a total of 235,064 treated with SGLT2 inhibitors and 235,064 treated with other GLDs. The participants were selected from national databases in Australia, Canada, Israel, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. Individuals with type 1 diabetes or gestational diabetes were excluded from the study.
Outcomes comparing SGLT2 inhibitors and other GLDs included all-cause death, all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure, hospitalization for heart failure, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the two treatment groups. Exposure time for patients in the SGLT2-inhibitor group was highest by far for dapagliflozin (75%), followed by empagliflozin, ipragliflozin, canagliflozin, tofogliflozin, and luseogliflozin at 9%, 8%, 4%, 3%, and 1%, respectively. (Ipragliflozin, tofogliflozin, and luseogliflozin are approved only in Japan.)
The researchers identified 5,216 deaths from any cause. Overall, treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor was associated with significantly lower risks of death (hazard ratio, 0.51), hospitalization for heart failure (HR, 0.64), death or hospitalization for heart failure (HR, 0.60), myocardial infarction (HR, 0.81), and stroke (HR, 0.68).
The findings remained consistent across countries and patient subgroups, and in patients with and without cardiovascular disease, Dr. Kosiborod noted.
The results were limited by several factors, including the observational nature of the study and incomplete mortality data, Dr. Kosiborod said. However, the results suggest that the SGLT2 inhibitors’ impacts on cardiovascular outcomes persist across categories of ethnicity, geography, and cardiovascular disease.
AstraZeneca supported the study. Dr. Kosiborod disclosed relationships with multiple companies including AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Glytec, and ZS Pharma. The findings were simultaneously published online (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.009).
SOURCE: Kosiborod M. ACC 2018.
ORLANDO – Cardiovascular outcomes were significantly more favorable with sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors compared with other glucose-lowering drugs, according to data from more than 400,000 type 2 diabetes patients in the Middle East, Asia Pacific, and North America.
Data on cardiovascular outcomes from diabetes treatments in patients outside the United States and Europe are limited, said Mikhail Kosiborod, MD, of Saint Luke’s Mid-America Heart Institute and University of Missouri–Kansas City.
In fact, most patients with type 2 diabetes reside in the Asia-Pacific and the Middle East, he said in a presentation at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
Dr. Kosiborod was involved in a previous large pharmaco-epidemiologic study known as the Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiovascular Outcomes in New Users of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors (CVD-REAL), that showed SGLT2 inhibitor effects in a broad population of type 2 diabetes patients, but that study included only patients from Europe and North America, and focused on just two outcomes: all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure.
The study population included adults aged 18 years and older diagnosed with type 2 diabetes; a total of 235,064 treated with SGLT2 inhibitors and 235,064 treated with other GLDs. The participants were selected from national databases in Australia, Canada, Israel, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. Individuals with type 1 diabetes or gestational diabetes were excluded from the study.
Outcomes comparing SGLT2 inhibitors and other GLDs included all-cause death, all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure, hospitalization for heart failure, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the two treatment groups. Exposure time for patients in the SGLT2-inhibitor group was highest by far for dapagliflozin (75%), followed by empagliflozin, ipragliflozin, canagliflozin, tofogliflozin, and luseogliflozin at 9%, 8%, 4%, 3%, and 1%, respectively. (Ipragliflozin, tofogliflozin, and luseogliflozin are approved only in Japan.)
The researchers identified 5,216 deaths from any cause. Overall, treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor was associated with significantly lower risks of death (hazard ratio, 0.51), hospitalization for heart failure (HR, 0.64), death or hospitalization for heart failure (HR, 0.60), myocardial infarction (HR, 0.81), and stroke (HR, 0.68).
The findings remained consistent across countries and patient subgroups, and in patients with and without cardiovascular disease, Dr. Kosiborod noted.
The results were limited by several factors, including the observational nature of the study and incomplete mortality data, Dr. Kosiborod said. However, the results suggest that the SGLT2 inhibitors’ impacts on cardiovascular outcomes persist across categories of ethnicity, geography, and cardiovascular disease.
AstraZeneca supported the study. Dr. Kosiborod disclosed relationships with multiple companies including AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Glytec, and ZS Pharma. The findings were simultaneously published online (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.009).
SOURCE: Kosiborod M. ACC 2018.
ORLANDO – Cardiovascular outcomes were significantly more favorable with sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors compared with other glucose-lowering drugs, according to data from more than 400,000 type 2 diabetes patients in the Middle East, Asia Pacific, and North America.
Data on cardiovascular outcomes from diabetes treatments in patients outside the United States and Europe are limited, said Mikhail Kosiborod, MD, of Saint Luke’s Mid-America Heart Institute and University of Missouri–Kansas City.
In fact, most patients with type 2 diabetes reside in the Asia-Pacific and the Middle East, he said in a presentation at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
Dr. Kosiborod was involved in a previous large pharmaco-epidemiologic study known as the Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiovascular Outcomes in New Users of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors (CVD-REAL), that showed SGLT2 inhibitor effects in a broad population of type 2 diabetes patients, but that study included only patients from Europe and North America, and focused on just two outcomes: all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure.
The study population included adults aged 18 years and older diagnosed with type 2 diabetes; a total of 235,064 treated with SGLT2 inhibitors and 235,064 treated with other GLDs. The participants were selected from national databases in Australia, Canada, Israel, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. Individuals with type 1 diabetes or gestational diabetes were excluded from the study.
Outcomes comparing SGLT2 inhibitors and other GLDs included all-cause death, all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure, hospitalization for heart failure, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the two treatment groups. Exposure time for patients in the SGLT2-inhibitor group was highest by far for dapagliflozin (75%), followed by empagliflozin, ipragliflozin, canagliflozin, tofogliflozin, and luseogliflozin at 9%, 8%, 4%, 3%, and 1%, respectively. (Ipragliflozin, tofogliflozin, and luseogliflozin are approved only in Japan.)
The researchers identified 5,216 deaths from any cause. Overall, treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor was associated with significantly lower risks of death (hazard ratio, 0.51), hospitalization for heart failure (HR, 0.64), death or hospitalization for heart failure (HR, 0.60), myocardial infarction (HR, 0.81), and stroke (HR, 0.68).
The findings remained consistent across countries and patient subgroups, and in patients with and without cardiovascular disease, Dr. Kosiborod noted.
The results were limited by several factors, including the observational nature of the study and incomplete mortality data, Dr. Kosiborod said. However, the results suggest that the SGLT2 inhibitors’ impacts on cardiovascular outcomes persist across categories of ethnicity, geography, and cardiovascular disease.
AstraZeneca supported the study. Dr. Kosiborod disclosed relationships with multiple companies including AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Glytec, and ZS Pharma. The findings were simultaneously published online (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.009).
SOURCE: Kosiborod M. ACC 2018.
REPORTING FROM ACC 18
Key clinical point: SGLT2 inhibitor use was linked to a lower risk of all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure, myocardial infarction, and stroke in a large, multinational study of adults with type 2 diabetes.
Major finding: All-cause mortality was significantly lower in patients treated with an SGLT2 inhibitor compared with other glucose lowering drugs (HR 0.51).
Study details: The data come from more than 400,000 adults with type 2 diabetes via databases in the Middle East, Asia Pacific, and North America.
Disclosures: AstraZeneca supported the study. Dr. Kosiborod disclosed relationships with AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Glytec, and ZS Pharma.
Source: Kosiborod M. ACC 2018.
Popular vaginal dryness products don’t beat placebos
based on data from a randomized trial of more than 300 patients suffering from genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), a constellation of symptoms including pain on vaginal penetration and vaginal dryness.
“Surveys of postmenopausal women demonstrate a preference for effective, nonhormonal therapies, often due to safety concerns,” wrote Caroline M. Mitchell, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and her colleagues. The report was published in JAMA Internal Medicine. The researchers randomized 302 postmenopausal women with GSM 1:1:1 to a Vagifem 10-microgram estradiol tablet and placebo gel, a placebo tablet and Replens gel, or a placebo tablet and a placebo gel.
The average age of the women was 61 years, 88% were white, and 81% were sexually active.
The primary outcome was a decrease in the most bothersome symptoms reported by the women after 12 weeks of treatment. The most common of these were pain on penetration (60%) and vulvovaginal dryness (21%).
After 12 weeks, the women reported no significant difference in most bothersome symptoms between estradiol or moisturizing gel, compared with placebo products (P = .25 and P = .31, respectively). The average improvement in symptom scores was similar between the estradiol tablet and placebo tablet (P = .64) and between the moisturizer and placebo gels (P = .17).
The study was limited by several factors including the homogenous population and the absence of a head-to-head comparison of treatments, the researchers noted. However, the results suggest that more research is needed about genitourinary syndrome of menopause, but that a nonprescription lubricating gel may be an appropriate estrogen-free choice, and that “treatment choice should be based on individual patient preferences regarding cost and formulation,” they said.
The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging. Dr. Mitchell is a consultant for Symbiomix Therapeutics, and coauthors reported grant support from Bayer and having served on a scientific advisory board for Sermonix.
SOURCE: Mitchell C et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0116.
The double-negative finding of the study suggests a potential change in clinical practice as to the value of estrogen for postmenopausal women, Alison J. Huang, MD, and Deborah Grady, MD, wrote in an editorial.
“Based on the results of this study, women and their physicians may want to take this one step further and conclude that postmenopausal women experiencing vulvovaginal symptoms should choose the cheapest moisturizer or lubricant available over the counter – at least until new evidence arises to suggest that there is any benefit to doing otherwise,” they said. The study compared popular active treatments – an estradiol tablet and a nonhormonal moisturizing gel – with placebo and not with each other, which could be considered a limitation, they said. However, the similar effectiveness of the treatments to placebo support a choice of treatments for vulvovaginal symptoms based on cost and patient preference for a particular formulation, they noted (JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0094).
Dr. Huang and Dr. Grady are affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco, and the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Dr. Huang disclosed research grants from Pfizer and Astellas Pharma. Dr. Grady has served as a consultant to MenoGeniX.
The double-negative finding of the study suggests a potential change in clinical practice as to the value of estrogen for postmenopausal women, Alison J. Huang, MD, and Deborah Grady, MD, wrote in an editorial.
“Based on the results of this study, women and their physicians may want to take this one step further and conclude that postmenopausal women experiencing vulvovaginal symptoms should choose the cheapest moisturizer or lubricant available over the counter – at least until new evidence arises to suggest that there is any benefit to doing otherwise,” they said. The study compared popular active treatments – an estradiol tablet and a nonhormonal moisturizing gel – with placebo and not with each other, which could be considered a limitation, they said. However, the similar effectiveness of the treatments to placebo support a choice of treatments for vulvovaginal symptoms based on cost and patient preference for a particular formulation, they noted (JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0094).
Dr. Huang and Dr. Grady are affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco, and the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Dr. Huang disclosed research grants from Pfizer and Astellas Pharma. Dr. Grady has served as a consultant to MenoGeniX.
The double-negative finding of the study suggests a potential change in clinical practice as to the value of estrogen for postmenopausal women, Alison J. Huang, MD, and Deborah Grady, MD, wrote in an editorial.
“Based on the results of this study, women and their physicians may want to take this one step further and conclude that postmenopausal women experiencing vulvovaginal symptoms should choose the cheapest moisturizer or lubricant available over the counter – at least until new evidence arises to suggest that there is any benefit to doing otherwise,” they said. The study compared popular active treatments – an estradiol tablet and a nonhormonal moisturizing gel – with placebo and not with each other, which could be considered a limitation, they said. However, the similar effectiveness of the treatments to placebo support a choice of treatments for vulvovaginal symptoms based on cost and patient preference for a particular formulation, they noted (JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0094).
Dr. Huang and Dr. Grady are affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco, and the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Dr. Huang disclosed research grants from Pfizer and Astellas Pharma. Dr. Grady has served as a consultant to MenoGeniX.
based on data from a randomized trial of more than 300 patients suffering from genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), a constellation of symptoms including pain on vaginal penetration and vaginal dryness.
“Surveys of postmenopausal women demonstrate a preference for effective, nonhormonal therapies, often due to safety concerns,” wrote Caroline M. Mitchell, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and her colleagues. The report was published in JAMA Internal Medicine. The researchers randomized 302 postmenopausal women with GSM 1:1:1 to a Vagifem 10-microgram estradiol tablet and placebo gel, a placebo tablet and Replens gel, or a placebo tablet and a placebo gel.
The average age of the women was 61 years, 88% were white, and 81% were sexually active.
The primary outcome was a decrease in the most bothersome symptoms reported by the women after 12 weeks of treatment. The most common of these were pain on penetration (60%) and vulvovaginal dryness (21%).
After 12 weeks, the women reported no significant difference in most bothersome symptoms between estradiol or moisturizing gel, compared with placebo products (P = .25 and P = .31, respectively). The average improvement in symptom scores was similar between the estradiol tablet and placebo tablet (P = .64) and between the moisturizer and placebo gels (P = .17).
The study was limited by several factors including the homogenous population and the absence of a head-to-head comparison of treatments, the researchers noted. However, the results suggest that more research is needed about genitourinary syndrome of menopause, but that a nonprescription lubricating gel may be an appropriate estrogen-free choice, and that “treatment choice should be based on individual patient preferences regarding cost and formulation,” they said.
The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging. Dr. Mitchell is a consultant for Symbiomix Therapeutics, and coauthors reported grant support from Bayer and having served on a scientific advisory board for Sermonix.
SOURCE: Mitchell C et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0116.
based on data from a randomized trial of more than 300 patients suffering from genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), a constellation of symptoms including pain on vaginal penetration and vaginal dryness.
“Surveys of postmenopausal women demonstrate a preference for effective, nonhormonal therapies, often due to safety concerns,” wrote Caroline M. Mitchell, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and her colleagues. The report was published in JAMA Internal Medicine. The researchers randomized 302 postmenopausal women with GSM 1:1:1 to a Vagifem 10-microgram estradiol tablet and placebo gel, a placebo tablet and Replens gel, or a placebo tablet and a placebo gel.
The average age of the women was 61 years, 88% were white, and 81% were sexually active.
The primary outcome was a decrease in the most bothersome symptoms reported by the women after 12 weeks of treatment. The most common of these were pain on penetration (60%) and vulvovaginal dryness (21%).
After 12 weeks, the women reported no significant difference in most bothersome symptoms between estradiol or moisturizing gel, compared with placebo products (P = .25 and P = .31, respectively). The average improvement in symptom scores was similar between the estradiol tablet and placebo tablet (P = .64) and between the moisturizer and placebo gels (P = .17).
The study was limited by several factors including the homogenous population and the absence of a head-to-head comparison of treatments, the researchers noted. However, the results suggest that more research is needed about genitourinary syndrome of menopause, but that a nonprescription lubricating gel may be an appropriate estrogen-free choice, and that “treatment choice should be based on individual patient preferences regarding cost and formulation,” they said.
The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging. Dr. Mitchell is a consultant for Symbiomix Therapeutics, and coauthors reported grant support from Bayer and having served on a scientific advisory board for Sermonix.
SOURCE: Mitchell C et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0116.
FROM JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE
Key clinical point: Estradiol tablets had no increased benefit, compared with placebo, for relieving postmenopausal vulvovaginal symptoms.
Major finding: The improvement in vaginal discomfort after 12 weeks was not significantly different between an estradiol tablet and placebo (P = .64) or between a popular vaginal moisturizer and placebo (P = .17).
Study details: The data come from a randomized, clinical trial of 302 postmenopausal women.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging. Dr. Mitchell is a consultant for Symbiomix Therapeutics, and coauthors reported grant support from Bayer and having served on a scientific advisory board for Sermonix.
Source: Mitchell C et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0116.
VIDEO: Patient vouchers prompt physicians to prescribe top antiplatelet drugs
ORLANDO – Patients who received vouchers to cover copayments were more likely to receive prescriptions for more effective antiplatelet medication, according to data from a multicenter, randomized trial.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
“We know that guidelines are very clear; we need to treat patients with antiplatelet therapy for 12 months,” and that the most potent drug, ticagrelor, should be used, Tracy Wang, MD, of Duke University, Durham, N.C., said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology. However, in the United States, clopidogrel, though less effective, is prescribed much more often, and many patients discontinue their P2Y12 inhibitor therapy within the first year because of cost, she added.
“We hypothesized that, by reducing the out of pocket costs, treatment would be more evidence driven, rather than driven by what patients could afford,” she said.
The Affordability and Real-World Antiplatelet Treatment Effectiveness After Myocardial Infarction Study (ARTEMIS) included 11,001 MI patients at 301 hospitals across the United States. Patients in the treatment hospital group received a voucher to use at a pharmacy or through a mail-order pharmacy to reduce out of pocket costs. Randomization occurred at the hospital level, and hospital characteristics were similar between the groups.
Overall, patients in the treatment group were significantly more likely to receive a prescription for ticagrelor than clopidogrel (60% vs. 36%); 55% and 32% of patients in the usual care group were prescribed ticagrelor and clopidogrel, respectively. Nonpersistence, defined as a gap in P2Y12-inhibitor use of at least 30 days within 1 year, was significantly lower in the treatment group than it was in the usual care group based on patient reported analysis (13% vs. 16%).
However, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events was roughly 10% in both groups. The similar outcomes may stem from the fact that 28% of patients with vouchers did not fill their prescriptions for reasons that the study did not explore, said Dr. Wang.
All patients had health insurance: 64% private, 42% Medicare, 9% Medicaid. The average age of the patients was 62 years, and 31% were women. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between the groups.
The vouchers affected choice of treatment but didn’t help clinical outcomes, which suggests that copayment reduction should be part of a broader strategy to help patients with adherence over time, said Dr. Wang.
Next steps for research include taking a subset of patients who are more likely to be nonadherent and at high risk for adverse events and targeting them for additional intervention, she noted.
Discussant Craig J. Beavers, PharmD, of the University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, agreed that a multipronged approach is needed to get patients to take their medicines. “We have to figure out what other barriers there are,” he said. “The real trick is, even if you lead a horse to water, how to get them to drink it,” he said.
The study was funded by AstraZeneca. Dr. Wang disclosed relationships with companies including Gilead Sciences, Merck, and Sanofi Pasteur. Dr. Beavers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
SOURCE: Wang T. ACC 18.
ORLANDO – Patients who received vouchers to cover copayments were more likely to receive prescriptions for more effective antiplatelet medication, according to data from a multicenter, randomized trial.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
“We know that guidelines are very clear; we need to treat patients with antiplatelet therapy for 12 months,” and that the most potent drug, ticagrelor, should be used, Tracy Wang, MD, of Duke University, Durham, N.C., said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology. However, in the United States, clopidogrel, though less effective, is prescribed much more often, and many patients discontinue their P2Y12 inhibitor therapy within the first year because of cost, she added.
“We hypothesized that, by reducing the out of pocket costs, treatment would be more evidence driven, rather than driven by what patients could afford,” she said.
The Affordability and Real-World Antiplatelet Treatment Effectiveness After Myocardial Infarction Study (ARTEMIS) included 11,001 MI patients at 301 hospitals across the United States. Patients in the treatment hospital group received a voucher to use at a pharmacy or through a mail-order pharmacy to reduce out of pocket costs. Randomization occurred at the hospital level, and hospital characteristics were similar between the groups.
Overall, patients in the treatment group were significantly more likely to receive a prescription for ticagrelor than clopidogrel (60% vs. 36%); 55% and 32% of patients in the usual care group were prescribed ticagrelor and clopidogrel, respectively. Nonpersistence, defined as a gap in P2Y12-inhibitor use of at least 30 days within 1 year, was significantly lower in the treatment group than it was in the usual care group based on patient reported analysis (13% vs. 16%).
However, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events was roughly 10% in both groups. The similar outcomes may stem from the fact that 28% of patients with vouchers did not fill their prescriptions for reasons that the study did not explore, said Dr. Wang.
All patients had health insurance: 64% private, 42% Medicare, 9% Medicaid. The average age of the patients was 62 years, and 31% were women. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between the groups.
The vouchers affected choice of treatment but didn’t help clinical outcomes, which suggests that copayment reduction should be part of a broader strategy to help patients with adherence over time, said Dr. Wang.
Next steps for research include taking a subset of patients who are more likely to be nonadherent and at high risk for adverse events and targeting them for additional intervention, she noted.
Discussant Craig J. Beavers, PharmD, of the University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, agreed that a multipronged approach is needed to get patients to take their medicines. “We have to figure out what other barriers there are,” he said. “The real trick is, even if you lead a horse to water, how to get them to drink it,” he said.
The study was funded by AstraZeneca. Dr. Wang disclosed relationships with companies including Gilead Sciences, Merck, and Sanofi Pasteur. Dr. Beavers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
SOURCE: Wang T. ACC 18.
ORLANDO – Patients who received vouchers to cover copayments were more likely to receive prescriptions for more effective antiplatelet medication, according to data from a multicenter, randomized trial.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
“We know that guidelines are very clear; we need to treat patients with antiplatelet therapy for 12 months,” and that the most potent drug, ticagrelor, should be used, Tracy Wang, MD, of Duke University, Durham, N.C., said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology. However, in the United States, clopidogrel, though less effective, is prescribed much more often, and many patients discontinue their P2Y12 inhibitor therapy within the first year because of cost, she added.
“We hypothesized that, by reducing the out of pocket costs, treatment would be more evidence driven, rather than driven by what patients could afford,” she said.
The Affordability and Real-World Antiplatelet Treatment Effectiveness After Myocardial Infarction Study (ARTEMIS) included 11,001 MI patients at 301 hospitals across the United States. Patients in the treatment hospital group received a voucher to use at a pharmacy or through a mail-order pharmacy to reduce out of pocket costs. Randomization occurred at the hospital level, and hospital characteristics were similar between the groups.
Overall, patients in the treatment group were significantly more likely to receive a prescription for ticagrelor than clopidogrel (60% vs. 36%); 55% and 32% of patients in the usual care group were prescribed ticagrelor and clopidogrel, respectively. Nonpersistence, defined as a gap in P2Y12-inhibitor use of at least 30 days within 1 year, was significantly lower in the treatment group than it was in the usual care group based on patient reported analysis (13% vs. 16%).
However, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events was roughly 10% in both groups. The similar outcomes may stem from the fact that 28% of patients with vouchers did not fill their prescriptions for reasons that the study did not explore, said Dr. Wang.
All patients had health insurance: 64% private, 42% Medicare, 9% Medicaid. The average age of the patients was 62 years, and 31% were women. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between the groups.
The vouchers affected choice of treatment but didn’t help clinical outcomes, which suggests that copayment reduction should be part of a broader strategy to help patients with adherence over time, said Dr. Wang.
Next steps for research include taking a subset of patients who are more likely to be nonadherent and at high risk for adverse events and targeting them for additional intervention, she noted.
Discussant Craig J. Beavers, PharmD, of the University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, agreed that a multipronged approach is needed to get patients to take their medicines. “We have to figure out what other barriers there are,” he said. “The real trick is, even if you lead a horse to water, how to get them to drink it,” he said.
The study was funded by AstraZeneca. Dr. Wang disclosed relationships with companies including Gilead Sciences, Merck, and Sanofi Pasteur. Dr. Beavers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
SOURCE: Wang T. ACC 18.
REPORTING FROM ACC 18
Key clinical point: Physicians were more likely to prescribe ticagrelor after an MI when patients received vouchers.
Major finding: Patients with vouchers received prescriptions for ticagrelor significantly more than clopidogrel (60% vs. 36%).
Study details: The data come from a randomized trial of 301 hospitals in the United States and included 11,001 MI patients.
Disclosures: ARTEMIS was funded by AstraZeneca. Dr. Wang disclosed relationships with companies including Gilead Sciences, Merck, and Sanofi Pasteur. Dr. Beavers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
Source: Wang T. ACC 2018.
Barbershop intervention cuts blood pressure in black men
ORLANDO – Black men who received a pharmacist-led intervention in their local barbershops showed significantly improved blood pressure after 6 months, compared with controls, in a randomized trial of 319 individuals.
“Non-Hispanic black men still have the highest hypertension death rate of any group in the country. Something like 60% of black men have blood pressure of 140/90 or higher,” but they have relatively low rates of physician interaction for blood pressure management, compared with other groups, Ronald G. Victor, MD, of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
“Health outreach to barbershops has been well established in the lay press, but they only scratch the surface in terms of a scientific evaluation, and that’s what we did,” he noted.
The primary outcome was a change in systolic blood pressure at 6 months. The average decrease was 27.0 mm Hg in the intervention group, compared with 9.3 mm Hg in the control group.
Dr. Victor and colleagues identified a study population of non-Hispanic black men aged 35-79 years with a baseline blood pressure of at least 140 mm Hg who were regular patrons of their local barbershops. Of these, 139 were randomized to a pharmacist-led intervention in 28 barbershops, and 180 served as controls in 24 barbershops.
The intervention included monthly checkups with a pharmacist in the barbershop setting, along with blood pressure readings, medication management, electrolyte monitoring, and progress notes sent to each man’s primary care provider. In addition, the barbers encouraged blood pressure management and a healthy lifestyle during the men’s regular haircut visits, occurring about every 2 weeks. The control group received encouragement from their barbers and usual care from their primary care providers.
The average baseline systolic blood pressure was 152.8 mm Hg in the intervention group, which dropped to 125.8 mm Hg at 6 months. The controls’ average systolic blood pressure was 154.6 mm Hg at baseline and 145.4 at 6 months.
Dr. Victor said he was thrilled with the results, and that the intervention group’s improvement was roughly three times that seen in many blood pressure intervention studies. “We lost very few men to follow-up,” Dr. Victor said. “I can’t underestimate how important the buy-in of the barbers was,” he emphasized. The primary analysis included 132 intervention men and 171 controls with complete 6 months data.
The between-group difference for the primary outcome was 21.6 mm Hg in favor of the intervention,” Dr. Victor said. As a secondary outcome, the between-group difference in diastolic blood pressure was 14.9 mm Hg in favor of the intervention.
In addition, 64% and 12% of the intervention and control groups, respectively, achieved the blood pressure target of 130/80.
“We think the intervention effect is multifaceted,” said Dr. Victor. The pharmacists were doctorate level with specialty training, and prescribed more intense therapy than did a community clinic. In addition, the convenience and comfort of the community barbershop setting, and the endorsement by the barbers, who are significant figures in the community, contributed to the success of the study, he said.
“We think the whole package was important,” he emphasized.
The intervention was safe and well tolerated, with no adverse events. A total of three cases of reversible acute kidney injury occurred in the intervention group that were related to indapamide and resolved when it was discontinued.
“This [study] is a home run,” discussant Eileen Handberg, MD, said in a press conference, “This is taking care where patients live; this is ‘high-touch’ medicine,” she said. Also, the 9-mm Hg improvement in the control group was comparable with improvements in many previous blood pressure control trials, she noted.
Dr. Victor said he plans to expand the study by establishing similar protocols in other communities. Additional next steps for research include extending the current study for another 6 months, expanding the research criteria to include men with mild hypertension, and conducting a cost analysis, he said.
The study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others. Dr. Victor had no financial conflicts to disclose. Dr. Handberg disclosed relationships with multiple companies including Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead Sciences, Ionis, and Relypsa.
The findings were published online simultaneously with Dr. Victor’s report (N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 11; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1717250).
SOURCE: Victor R et al. ACC 2018.
ORLANDO – Black men who received a pharmacist-led intervention in their local barbershops showed significantly improved blood pressure after 6 months, compared with controls, in a randomized trial of 319 individuals.
“Non-Hispanic black men still have the highest hypertension death rate of any group in the country. Something like 60% of black men have blood pressure of 140/90 or higher,” but they have relatively low rates of physician interaction for blood pressure management, compared with other groups, Ronald G. Victor, MD, of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
“Health outreach to barbershops has been well established in the lay press, but they only scratch the surface in terms of a scientific evaluation, and that’s what we did,” he noted.
The primary outcome was a change in systolic blood pressure at 6 months. The average decrease was 27.0 mm Hg in the intervention group, compared with 9.3 mm Hg in the control group.
Dr. Victor and colleagues identified a study population of non-Hispanic black men aged 35-79 years with a baseline blood pressure of at least 140 mm Hg who were regular patrons of their local barbershops. Of these, 139 were randomized to a pharmacist-led intervention in 28 barbershops, and 180 served as controls in 24 barbershops.
The intervention included monthly checkups with a pharmacist in the barbershop setting, along with blood pressure readings, medication management, electrolyte monitoring, and progress notes sent to each man’s primary care provider. In addition, the barbers encouraged blood pressure management and a healthy lifestyle during the men’s regular haircut visits, occurring about every 2 weeks. The control group received encouragement from their barbers and usual care from their primary care providers.
The average baseline systolic blood pressure was 152.8 mm Hg in the intervention group, which dropped to 125.8 mm Hg at 6 months. The controls’ average systolic blood pressure was 154.6 mm Hg at baseline and 145.4 at 6 months.
Dr. Victor said he was thrilled with the results, and that the intervention group’s improvement was roughly three times that seen in many blood pressure intervention studies. “We lost very few men to follow-up,” Dr. Victor said. “I can’t underestimate how important the buy-in of the barbers was,” he emphasized. The primary analysis included 132 intervention men and 171 controls with complete 6 months data.
The between-group difference for the primary outcome was 21.6 mm Hg in favor of the intervention,” Dr. Victor said. As a secondary outcome, the between-group difference in diastolic blood pressure was 14.9 mm Hg in favor of the intervention.
In addition, 64% and 12% of the intervention and control groups, respectively, achieved the blood pressure target of 130/80.
“We think the intervention effect is multifaceted,” said Dr. Victor. The pharmacists were doctorate level with specialty training, and prescribed more intense therapy than did a community clinic. In addition, the convenience and comfort of the community barbershop setting, and the endorsement by the barbers, who are significant figures in the community, contributed to the success of the study, he said.
“We think the whole package was important,” he emphasized.
The intervention was safe and well tolerated, with no adverse events. A total of three cases of reversible acute kidney injury occurred in the intervention group that were related to indapamide and resolved when it was discontinued.
“This [study] is a home run,” discussant Eileen Handberg, MD, said in a press conference, “This is taking care where patients live; this is ‘high-touch’ medicine,” she said. Also, the 9-mm Hg improvement in the control group was comparable with improvements in many previous blood pressure control trials, she noted.
Dr. Victor said he plans to expand the study by establishing similar protocols in other communities. Additional next steps for research include extending the current study for another 6 months, expanding the research criteria to include men with mild hypertension, and conducting a cost analysis, he said.
The study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others. Dr. Victor had no financial conflicts to disclose. Dr. Handberg disclosed relationships with multiple companies including Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead Sciences, Ionis, and Relypsa.
The findings were published online simultaneously with Dr. Victor’s report (N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 11; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1717250).
SOURCE: Victor R et al. ACC 2018.
ORLANDO – Black men who received a pharmacist-led intervention in their local barbershops showed significantly improved blood pressure after 6 months, compared with controls, in a randomized trial of 319 individuals.
“Non-Hispanic black men still have the highest hypertension death rate of any group in the country. Something like 60% of black men have blood pressure of 140/90 or higher,” but they have relatively low rates of physician interaction for blood pressure management, compared with other groups, Ronald G. Victor, MD, of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
“Health outreach to barbershops has been well established in the lay press, but they only scratch the surface in terms of a scientific evaluation, and that’s what we did,” he noted.
The primary outcome was a change in systolic blood pressure at 6 months. The average decrease was 27.0 mm Hg in the intervention group, compared with 9.3 mm Hg in the control group.
Dr. Victor and colleagues identified a study population of non-Hispanic black men aged 35-79 years with a baseline blood pressure of at least 140 mm Hg who were regular patrons of their local barbershops. Of these, 139 were randomized to a pharmacist-led intervention in 28 barbershops, and 180 served as controls in 24 barbershops.
The intervention included monthly checkups with a pharmacist in the barbershop setting, along with blood pressure readings, medication management, electrolyte monitoring, and progress notes sent to each man’s primary care provider. In addition, the barbers encouraged blood pressure management and a healthy lifestyle during the men’s regular haircut visits, occurring about every 2 weeks. The control group received encouragement from their barbers and usual care from their primary care providers.
The average baseline systolic blood pressure was 152.8 mm Hg in the intervention group, which dropped to 125.8 mm Hg at 6 months. The controls’ average systolic blood pressure was 154.6 mm Hg at baseline and 145.4 at 6 months.
Dr. Victor said he was thrilled with the results, and that the intervention group’s improvement was roughly three times that seen in many blood pressure intervention studies. “We lost very few men to follow-up,” Dr. Victor said. “I can’t underestimate how important the buy-in of the barbers was,” he emphasized. The primary analysis included 132 intervention men and 171 controls with complete 6 months data.
The between-group difference for the primary outcome was 21.6 mm Hg in favor of the intervention,” Dr. Victor said. As a secondary outcome, the between-group difference in diastolic blood pressure was 14.9 mm Hg in favor of the intervention.
In addition, 64% and 12% of the intervention and control groups, respectively, achieved the blood pressure target of 130/80.
“We think the intervention effect is multifaceted,” said Dr. Victor. The pharmacists were doctorate level with specialty training, and prescribed more intense therapy than did a community clinic. In addition, the convenience and comfort of the community barbershop setting, and the endorsement by the barbers, who are significant figures in the community, contributed to the success of the study, he said.
“We think the whole package was important,” he emphasized.
The intervention was safe and well tolerated, with no adverse events. A total of three cases of reversible acute kidney injury occurred in the intervention group that were related to indapamide and resolved when it was discontinued.
“This [study] is a home run,” discussant Eileen Handberg, MD, said in a press conference, “This is taking care where patients live; this is ‘high-touch’ medicine,” she said. Also, the 9-mm Hg improvement in the control group was comparable with improvements in many previous blood pressure control trials, she noted.
Dr. Victor said he plans to expand the study by establishing similar protocols in other communities. Additional next steps for research include extending the current study for another 6 months, expanding the research criteria to include men with mild hypertension, and conducting a cost analysis, he said.
The study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others. Dr. Victor had no financial conflicts to disclose. Dr. Handberg disclosed relationships with multiple companies including Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead Sciences, Ionis, and Relypsa.
The findings were published online simultaneously with Dr. Victor’s report (N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 11; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1717250).
SOURCE: Victor R et al. ACC 2018.
REPORTING FROM ACC 18
Key clinical point: Major finding: After 6 months, mean systolic blood pressure among men who received intervention dropped an average of 27 mm Hg, compared with 9 mm Hg in controls.
Study details: The data come from a cluster randomized trial including 319 black men who visited 52 barbershops.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others.
Source: Victor R et al. ACC 2018.