Eccrine Porocarcinoma in 2 Patients

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 06/29/2023 - 09:34
Display Headline
Eccrine Porocarcinoma in 2 Patients

To the Editor:

Porocarcinoma is a rare malignancy of the eccrine sweat glands and is commonly misdiagnosed clinically. We present 2 cases of porocarcinoma and highlight key features of this uncommon disease.

A 1.4-cm, heterochromic, pedunculated, keratotic tumor with crusting on the right temporal scalp that was diagnosed as porocarcinoma.
FIGURE 1. A 1.4-cm, heterochromic, pedunculated, keratotic tumor with crusting on the right temporal scalp that was diagnosed as porocarcinoma.

A 65-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a chief concern of a bump on the head of 8 months' duration that gradually enlarged. The lesion recently became painful and contributed to frequent headaches. He reported a history of smoking 1 pack per day and denied trauma to the area or history of immunosuppression. He had no personal or family history of skin cancer. Physical examination revealed a 1.4-cm, heterochromic, pedunculated, keratotic tumor with crusting on the right temporal scalp (Figure 1). No lymphadenopathy was appreciated. The clinical differential diagnosis included irritated seborrheic keratosis, pyogenic granuloma, polypoid malignant melanoma, and nonmelanoma skin cancer. A biopsy of the lesion demonstrated a proliferation of cuboidal cells with focal ductular differentiation arranged in interanastamosing strands arising from the epidermis (Figure 2). Scattered mitotic figures, including atypical forms, cytologic atypia, and foci of necrosis, also were present. The findings were consistent with features of porocarcinoma. Contrast computed tomography of the neck showed no evidence of metastatic disease within the neck. A wide local excision was performed and yielded a tumor measuring 1.8×1.6×0.7 cm with a depth of 0.3 cm and uninvolved margins. No lymphovascular or perineural invasion was identified. At 4-month follow-up, the patient had a well-healed scar on the right scalp without evidence of recurrence or lymphadenopathy.

Histopathology revealed anastomosing epidermal strands of malignant cuboidal cells with ductular differentiation and less differentiated, deeper areas with necrosis (H&E, original magnification ×40).
FIGURE 2. Histopathology revealed anastomosing epidermal strands of malignant cuboidal cells with ductular differentiation and less differentiated, deeper areas with necrosis (H&E, original magnification ×40).

A 32-year-old woman presented to dermatology with a chief concern of a mass on the back of 2 years’ duration that rapidly enlarged and became painful following irritation from her bra strap 2 months earlier. She had no relevant medical history. Physical examination revealed a firm, tender, heterochromic nodule measuring 3.0×2.8 cm on the left mid back inferior to the left scapula (Figure 3). The lesion expressed serosanguineous discharge. No lymphadenopathy was appreciated on examination. The clinical differential diagnosis included an inflamed cyst, nodular melanoma, cutaneous metastasis, and nonmelanoma skin cancer. The patient underwent an excisional biopsy, which demonstrated porocarcinoma with positive margins, microsatellitosis, and evidence of lymphovascular invasion. Carcinoembryonic antigen immunohistochemistry highlighted ducts within the tumor (Figure 4). The patient underwent re-excision with 2-cm margins, and no residual tumor was appreciated on pathology.

A firm, tender, erythematous to black nodule measuring 3.0×2.8 cm on the left mid back inferior to the left scapula that was diagnosed as porocarcinoma.
FIGURE 3. A firm, tender, erythematous to black nodule measuring 3.0×2.8 cm on the left mid back inferior to the left scapula that was diagnosed as porocarcinoma.

Positron emission tomography and computed tomography revealed a hypermetabolic left axillary lymph node. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration was positive for malignant cells consistent with metastatic carcinoma. Dissection of left axillary lymph nodes yielded metastatic porocarcinoma in 2 of 13 nodes. The largest tumor deposit measured 0.9 cm, and no extracapsular extension was identified. The patient continues to be monitored with semiannual full-body skin examinations as well as positron emission tomography and computed tomography scans, with no evidence of recurrence 2 years later.

Immunohistochemistry with polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen Fast Red chromogen highlighted ducts within the tumor (original magnification ×200).
FIGURE 4. Immunohistochemistry with polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen Fast Red chromogen highlighted ducts within the tumor (original magnification ×200).

Porocarcinoma is a rare malignancy of the skin arising from the eccrine sweat glands1 with an incidence rate of 0.4 cases per 1 million person-years in the United States. These tumors represent 0.005% to 0.01% of all skin cancers.2 The mean age of onset is approximately 65 years with no predilection for sex. The mean time from initial presentation to treatment is 5.6 to 8.5 years.3-5

Eccrine sweat glands consist of a straight intradermal duct (syrinx); coiled intradermal duct; and spiral intraepidermal duct (acrosyringium), which opens onto the skin. Both eccrine poromas (solitary benign eccrine gland tumors) and eccrine porocarcinomas develop from the acrosyringium. Eccrine poromas most commonly are found in sites containing the highest density of eccrine glands such as the palms, soles, axillae, and forehead, whereas porocarcinomas most commonly are found on the head, neck, arms, and legs.1,3,4,6,7 A solitary painless nodule that may ulcerate or bleed is the most common presentation.1,3-5,7

The etiology of eccrine porocarcinoma is poorly understood, but it has been found to arise de novo or to develop from pre-existing poromas or even from nevus sebaceus of Jadassohn. Chronic sunlight exposure, irradiation, lymphedema, trauma, and immunosuppression (eg, Hodgkin disease, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, HIV) have been reported as potential predisposing factors.3,4,6,8,9

Eccrine porocarcinoma often is clinically misdiagnosed as nonmelanoma skin cancer, pyogenic granuloma, amelanotic melanoma, fibroma, verruca vulgaris, or metastatic carcinoma. Appropriate classification is essential, as metastasis is present in 25% to 31% of cases, and local recurrence occurs in 20% to 25% of cases.1,3-5,7

Microscopically, porocarcinomas are comprised of atypical basaloid epithelial cells with focal ductular differentiation. Typically, there is an extensive intraepidermal component that invades into the dermis in anastomosing ribbons and cords. The degree of nuclear atypia, mitotic activity, and invasive growth pattern, as well as the presence of necrosis, are useful histologic features to differentiate porocarcinoma from poroma, which may be present in the background. Given the sometimes-extensive squamous differentiation, porocarcinoma can be confused with squamous cell carcinoma. In these cases, immunohistochemical stains such as epithelial membrane antigen or carcinoembryonic antigen can be used to highlight the ductal differentiation.1,5,8,10

Poor histologic prognostic indicators include a high mitotic index (>14 mitoses per field), a tumor depth greater than 7 mm, and evidence of lymphovascular invasion. Positive lymph node involvement is associated with a 65% to 67% mortality rate.1,8

Because of its propensity to metastasize via the lymphatic system and the high mortality rate associated with such metastases, early identification and treatment are essential. Treatment is accomplished via Mohs micrographic surgery or wide local excision with negative margins. Lymphadenectomy is indicated if regional lymph nodes are involved. Radiation and chemotherapy have been used in patients with metastatic and recurrent disease with mixed results.1,3-5,7 There is no adequate standardized chemotherapy or drug regimen established for porocarcinoma.5 Tsunoda et al11 proposed that sentinel lymph node biopsy should be considered first-line management of eccrine porocarcinoma; however, this remains unproven on the basis of a limited case series. Others conclude that sentinel lymph node biopsy should be recommended for cases with poor histologic prognostic features.1,5

References
  1. Marone U, Caraco C, Anniciello AM, et al. Metastatic eccrine porocarcinoma: report of a case and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol. 2011;9:32.
  2. Blake PW, Bradford PT, Devesa SS, et al. Cutaneous appendageal carcinoma incidence and survival patterns in the United States: a population-based study. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146:625-632.
  3. Salih AM, Kakamad FH, Baba HO, et al. Porocarcinoma; presentation and management, a meta-analysis of 453 cases. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017;20:74-79.
  4. Ritter AM, Graham RS, Amaker B, et al. Intracranial extension of an eccrine porocarcinoma. case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:138-140.
  5. Khaja M, Ashraf U, Mehershahi S, et al. Recurrent metastatic eccrine porocarcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Case Rep. 2019;20:179-183.
  6. Sawaya JL, Khachemoune A. Poroma: a review of eccrine, apocrine, and malignant forms. Int J Dermatol. 2014;53:1053-1061.
  7. Lloyd MS, El-Muttardi N, Robson A. Eccrine porocarcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Can J Plast Surg. 2003;11:153-156.
  8. Robson A, Greene J, Ansari N, et al. Eccrine porocarcinoma (malignant eccrine poroma): a clinicopathologic study of 69 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:710-720.
  9. Tarkhan II, Domingo J. Metastasizing eccrine porocarcinoma developing in a sebaceous nevus of Jadassohn. report of a case. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:413‐415.
  10. Prieto VG, Shea CR, Celebi JK, et al. Adnexal tumors. In: Busam KJ. Dermatopathology: A Volume in the Foundations in Diagnostic Pathology Series. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2016:388-446.
  11. Tsunoda K, Onishi M, Maeda F, et al. Evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy for eccrine porocarcinoma. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99:691-692.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Duff is from the University of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson. Drs. Aleisa, Lopez, Forcucci, and Thiers are from the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Drs. Aleisa and Thiers are from the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, and Drs. Lopez and Forcucci are from Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: David B. Duff, MD, University of Mississippi School of Medicine, 720 Gillespie St, Jackson, MS 39202 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 111(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E22-E24
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Duff is from the University of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson. Drs. Aleisa, Lopez, Forcucci, and Thiers are from the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Drs. Aleisa and Thiers are from the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, and Drs. Lopez and Forcucci are from Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: David B. Duff, MD, University of Mississippi School of Medicine, 720 Gillespie St, Jackson, MS 39202 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Duff is from the University of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson. Drs. Aleisa, Lopez, Forcucci, and Thiers are from the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Drs. Aleisa and Thiers are from the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, and Drs. Lopez and Forcucci are from Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: David B. Duff, MD, University of Mississippi School of Medicine, 720 Gillespie St, Jackson, MS 39202 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF

To the Editor:

Porocarcinoma is a rare malignancy of the eccrine sweat glands and is commonly misdiagnosed clinically. We present 2 cases of porocarcinoma and highlight key features of this uncommon disease.

A 1.4-cm, heterochromic, pedunculated, keratotic tumor with crusting on the right temporal scalp that was diagnosed as porocarcinoma.
FIGURE 1. A 1.4-cm, heterochromic, pedunculated, keratotic tumor with crusting on the right temporal scalp that was diagnosed as porocarcinoma.

A 65-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a chief concern of a bump on the head of 8 months' duration that gradually enlarged. The lesion recently became painful and contributed to frequent headaches. He reported a history of smoking 1 pack per day and denied trauma to the area or history of immunosuppression. He had no personal or family history of skin cancer. Physical examination revealed a 1.4-cm, heterochromic, pedunculated, keratotic tumor with crusting on the right temporal scalp (Figure 1). No lymphadenopathy was appreciated. The clinical differential diagnosis included irritated seborrheic keratosis, pyogenic granuloma, polypoid malignant melanoma, and nonmelanoma skin cancer. A biopsy of the lesion demonstrated a proliferation of cuboidal cells with focal ductular differentiation arranged in interanastamosing strands arising from the epidermis (Figure 2). Scattered mitotic figures, including atypical forms, cytologic atypia, and foci of necrosis, also were present. The findings were consistent with features of porocarcinoma. Contrast computed tomography of the neck showed no evidence of metastatic disease within the neck. A wide local excision was performed and yielded a tumor measuring 1.8×1.6×0.7 cm with a depth of 0.3 cm and uninvolved margins. No lymphovascular or perineural invasion was identified. At 4-month follow-up, the patient had a well-healed scar on the right scalp without evidence of recurrence or lymphadenopathy.

Histopathology revealed anastomosing epidermal strands of malignant cuboidal cells with ductular differentiation and less differentiated, deeper areas with necrosis (H&E, original magnification ×40).
FIGURE 2. Histopathology revealed anastomosing epidermal strands of malignant cuboidal cells with ductular differentiation and less differentiated, deeper areas with necrosis (H&E, original magnification ×40).

A 32-year-old woman presented to dermatology with a chief concern of a mass on the back of 2 years’ duration that rapidly enlarged and became painful following irritation from her bra strap 2 months earlier. She had no relevant medical history. Physical examination revealed a firm, tender, heterochromic nodule measuring 3.0×2.8 cm on the left mid back inferior to the left scapula (Figure 3). The lesion expressed serosanguineous discharge. No lymphadenopathy was appreciated on examination. The clinical differential diagnosis included an inflamed cyst, nodular melanoma, cutaneous metastasis, and nonmelanoma skin cancer. The patient underwent an excisional biopsy, which demonstrated porocarcinoma with positive margins, microsatellitosis, and evidence of lymphovascular invasion. Carcinoembryonic antigen immunohistochemistry highlighted ducts within the tumor (Figure 4). The patient underwent re-excision with 2-cm margins, and no residual tumor was appreciated on pathology.

A firm, tender, erythematous to black nodule measuring 3.0×2.8 cm on the left mid back inferior to the left scapula that was diagnosed as porocarcinoma.
FIGURE 3. A firm, tender, erythematous to black nodule measuring 3.0×2.8 cm on the left mid back inferior to the left scapula that was diagnosed as porocarcinoma.

Positron emission tomography and computed tomography revealed a hypermetabolic left axillary lymph node. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration was positive for malignant cells consistent with metastatic carcinoma. Dissection of left axillary lymph nodes yielded metastatic porocarcinoma in 2 of 13 nodes. The largest tumor deposit measured 0.9 cm, and no extracapsular extension was identified. The patient continues to be monitored with semiannual full-body skin examinations as well as positron emission tomography and computed tomography scans, with no evidence of recurrence 2 years later.

Immunohistochemistry with polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen Fast Red chromogen highlighted ducts within the tumor (original magnification ×200).
FIGURE 4. Immunohistochemistry with polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen Fast Red chromogen highlighted ducts within the tumor (original magnification ×200).

Porocarcinoma is a rare malignancy of the skin arising from the eccrine sweat glands1 with an incidence rate of 0.4 cases per 1 million person-years in the United States. These tumors represent 0.005% to 0.01% of all skin cancers.2 The mean age of onset is approximately 65 years with no predilection for sex. The mean time from initial presentation to treatment is 5.6 to 8.5 years.3-5

Eccrine sweat glands consist of a straight intradermal duct (syrinx); coiled intradermal duct; and spiral intraepidermal duct (acrosyringium), which opens onto the skin. Both eccrine poromas (solitary benign eccrine gland tumors) and eccrine porocarcinomas develop from the acrosyringium. Eccrine poromas most commonly are found in sites containing the highest density of eccrine glands such as the palms, soles, axillae, and forehead, whereas porocarcinomas most commonly are found on the head, neck, arms, and legs.1,3,4,6,7 A solitary painless nodule that may ulcerate or bleed is the most common presentation.1,3-5,7

The etiology of eccrine porocarcinoma is poorly understood, but it has been found to arise de novo or to develop from pre-existing poromas or even from nevus sebaceus of Jadassohn. Chronic sunlight exposure, irradiation, lymphedema, trauma, and immunosuppression (eg, Hodgkin disease, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, HIV) have been reported as potential predisposing factors.3,4,6,8,9

Eccrine porocarcinoma often is clinically misdiagnosed as nonmelanoma skin cancer, pyogenic granuloma, amelanotic melanoma, fibroma, verruca vulgaris, or metastatic carcinoma. Appropriate classification is essential, as metastasis is present in 25% to 31% of cases, and local recurrence occurs in 20% to 25% of cases.1,3-5,7

Microscopically, porocarcinomas are comprised of atypical basaloid epithelial cells with focal ductular differentiation. Typically, there is an extensive intraepidermal component that invades into the dermis in anastomosing ribbons and cords. The degree of nuclear atypia, mitotic activity, and invasive growth pattern, as well as the presence of necrosis, are useful histologic features to differentiate porocarcinoma from poroma, which may be present in the background. Given the sometimes-extensive squamous differentiation, porocarcinoma can be confused with squamous cell carcinoma. In these cases, immunohistochemical stains such as epithelial membrane antigen or carcinoembryonic antigen can be used to highlight the ductal differentiation.1,5,8,10

Poor histologic prognostic indicators include a high mitotic index (>14 mitoses per field), a tumor depth greater than 7 mm, and evidence of lymphovascular invasion. Positive lymph node involvement is associated with a 65% to 67% mortality rate.1,8

Because of its propensity to metastasize via the lymphatic system and the high mortality rate associated with such metastases, early identification and treatment are essential. Treatment is accomplished via Mohs micrographic surgery or wide local excision with negative margins. Lymphadenectomy is indicated if regional lymph nodes are involved. Radiation and chemotherapy have been used in patients with metastatic and recurrent disease with mixed results.1,3-5,7 There is no adequate standardized chemotherapy or drug regimen established for porocarcinoma.5 Tsunoda et al11 proposed that sentinel lymph node biopsy should be considered first-line management of eccrine porocarcinoma; however, this remains unproven on the basis of a limited case series. Others conclude that sentinel lymph node biopsy should be recommended for cases with poor histologic prognostic features.1,5

To the Editor:

Porocarcinoma is a rare malignancy of the eccrine sweat glands and is commonly misdiagnosed clinically. We present 2 cases of porocarcinoma and highlight key features of this uncommon disease.

A 1.4-cm, heterochromic, pedunculated, keratotic tumor with crusting on the right temporal scalp that was diagnosed as porocarcinoma.
FIGURE 1. A 1.4-cm, heterochromic, pedunculated, keratotic tumor with crusting on the right temporal scalp that was diagnosed as porocarcinoma.

A 65-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a chief concern of a bump on the head of 8 months' duration that gradually enlarged. The lesion recently became painful and contributed to frequent headaches. He reported a history of smoking 1 pack per day and denied trauma to the area or history of immunosuppression. He had no personal or family history of skin cancer. Physical examination revealed a 1.4-cm, heterochromic, pedunculated, keratotic tumor with crusting on the right temporal scalp (Figure 1). No lymphadenopathy was appreciated. The clinical differential diagnosis included irritated seborrheic keratosis, pyogenic granuloma, polypoid malignant melanoma, and nonmelanoma skin cancer. A biopsy of the lesion demonstrated a proliferation of cuboidal cells with focal ductular differentiation arranged in interanastamosing strands arising from the epidermis (Figure 2). Scattered mitotic figures, including atypical forms, cytologic atypia, and foci of necrosis, also were present. The findings were consistent with features of porocarcinoma. Contrast computed tomography of the neck showed no evidence of metastatic disease within the neck. A wide local excision was performed and yielded a tumor measuring 1.8×1.6×0.7 cm with a depth of 0.3 cm and uninvolved margins. No lymphovascular or perineural invasion was identified. At 4-month follow-up, the patient had a well-healed scar on the right scalp without evidence of recurrence or lymphadenopathy.

Histopathology revealed anastomosing epidermal strands of malignant cuboidal cells with ductular differentiation and less differentiated, deeper areas with necrosis (H&E, original magnification ×40).
FIGURE 2. Histopathology revealed anastomosing epidermal strands of malignant cuboidal cells with ductular differentiation and less differentiated, deeper areas with necrosis (H&E, original magnification ×40).

A 32-year-old woman presented to dermatology with a chief concern of a mass on the back of 2 years’ duration that rapidly enlarged and became painful following irritation from her bra strap 2 months earlier. She had no relevant medical history. Physical examination revealed a firm, tender, heterochromic nodule measuring 3.0×2.8 cm on the left mid back inferior to the left scapula (Figure 3). The lesion expressed serosanguineous discharge. No lymphadenopathy was appreciated on examination. The clinical differential diagnosis included an inflamed cyst, nodular melanoma, cutaneous metastasis, and nonmelanoma skin cancer. The patient underwent an excisional biopsy, which demonstrated porocarcinoma with positive margins, microsatellitosis, and evidence of lymphovascular invasion. Carcinoembryonic antigen immunohistochemistry highlighted ducts within the tumor (Figure 4). The patient underwent re-excision with 2-cm margins, and no residual tumor was appreciated on pathology.

A firm, tender, erythematous to black nodule measuring 3.0×2.8 cm on the left mid back inferior to the left scapula that was diagnosed as porocarcinoma.
FIGURE 3. A firm, tender, erythematous to black nodule measuring 3.0×2.8 cm on the left mid back inferior to the left scapula that was diagnosed as porocarcinoma.

Positron emission tomography and computed tomography revealed a hypermetabolic left axillary lymph node. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration was positive for malignant cells consistent with metastatic carcinoma. Dissection of left axillary lymph nodes yielded metastatic porocarcinoma in 2 of 13 nodes. The largest tumor deposit measured 0.9 cm, and no extracapsular extension was identified. The patient continues to be monitored with semiannual full-body skin examinations as well as positron emission tomography and computed tomography scans, with no evidence of recurrence 2 years later.

Immunohistochemistry with polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen Fast Red chromogen highlighted ducts within the tumor (original magnification ×200).
FIGURE 4. Immunohistochemistry with polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen Fast Red chromogen highlighted ducts within the tumor (original magnification ×200).

Porocarcinoma is a rare malignancy of the skin arising from the eccrine sweat glands1 with an incidence rate of 0.4 cases per 1 million person-years in the United States. These tumors represent 0.005% to 0.01% of all skin cancers.2 The mean age of onset is approximately 65 years with no predilection for sex. The mean time from initial presentation to treatment is 5.6 to 8.5 years.3-5

Eccrine sweat glands consist of a straight intradermal duct (syrinx); coiled intradermal duct; and spiral intraepidermal duct (acrosyringium), which opens onto the skin. Both eccrine poromas (solitary benign eccrine gland tumors) and eccrine porocarcinomas develop from the acrosyringium. Eccrine poromas most commonly are found in sites containing the highest density of eccrine glands such as the palms, soles, axillae, and forehead, whereas porocarcinomas most commonly are found on the head, neck, arms, and legs.1,3,4,6,7 A solitary painless nodule that may ulcerate or bleed is the most common presentation.1,3-5,7

The etiology of eccrine porocarcinoma is poorly understood, but it has been found to arise de novo or to develop from pre-existing poromas or even from nevus sebaceus of Jadassohn. Chronic sunlight exposure, irradiation, lymphedema, trauma, and immunosuppression (eg, Hodgkin disease, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, HIV) have been reported as potential predisposing factors.3,4,6,8,9

Eccrine porocarcinoma often is clinically misdiagnosed as nonmelanoma skin cancer, pyogenic granuloma, amelanotic melanoma, fibroma, verruca vulgaris, or metastatic carcinoma. Appropriate classification is essential, as metastasis is present in 25% to 31% of cases, and local recurrence occurs in 20% to 25% of cases.1,3-5,7

Microscopically, porocarcinomas are comprised of atypical basaloid epithelial cells with focal ductular differentiation. Typically, there is an extensive intraepidermal component that invades into the dermis in anastomosing ribbons and cords. The degree of nuclear atypia, mitotic activity, and invasive growth pattern, as well as the presence of necrosis, are useful histologic features to differentiate porocarcinoma from poroma, which may be present in the background. Given the sometimes-extensive squamous differentiation, porocarcinoma can be confused with squamous cell carcinoma. In these cases, immunohistochemical stains such as epithelial membrane antigen or carcinoembryonic antigen can be used to highlight the ductal differentiation.1,5,8,10

Poor histologic prognostic indicators include a high mitotic index (>14 mitoses per field), a tumor depth greater than 7 mm, and evidence of lymphovascular invasion. Positive lymph node involvement is associated with a 65% to 67% mortality rate.1,8

Because of its propensity to metastasize via the lymphatic system and the high mortality rate associated with such metastases, early identification and treatment are essential. Treatment is accomplished via Mohs micrographic surgery or wide local excision with negative margins. Lymphadenectomy is indicated if regional lymph nodes are involved. Radiation and chemotherapy have been used in patients with metastatic and recurrent disease with mixed results.1,3-5,7 There is no adequate standardized chemotherapy or drug regimen established for porocarcinoma.5 Tsunoda et al11 proposed that sentinel lymph node biopsy should be considered first-line management of eccrine porocarcinoma; however, this remains unproven on the basis of a limited case series. Others conclude that sentinel lymph node biopsy should be recommended for cases with poor histologic prognostic features.1,5

References
  1. Marone U, Caraco C, Anniciello AM, et al. Metastatic eccrine porocarcinoma: report of a case and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol. 2011;9:32.
  2. Blake PW, Bradford PT, Devesa SS, et al. Cutaneous appendageal carcinoma incidence and survival patterns in the United States: a population-based study. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146:625-632.
  3. Salih AM, Kakamad FH, Baba HO, et al. Porocarcinoma; presentation and management, a meta-analysis of 453 cases. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017;20:74-79.
  4. Ritter AM, Graham RS, Amaker B, et al. Intracranial extension of an eccrine porocarcinoma. case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:138-140.
  5. Khaja M, Ashraf U, Mehershahi S, et al. Recurrent metastatic eccrine porocarcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Case Rep. 2019;20:179-183.
  6. Sawaya JL, Khachemoune A. Poroma: a review of eccrine, apocrine, and malignant forms. Int J Dermatol. 2014;53:1053-1061.
  7. Lloyd MS, El-Muttardi N, Robson A. Eccrine porocarcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Can J Plast Surg. 2003;11:153-156.
  8. Robson A, Greene J, Ansari N, et al. Eccrine porocarcinoma (malignant eccrine poroma): a clinicopathologic study of 69 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:710-720.
  9. Tarkhan II, Domingo J. Metastasizing eccrine porocarcinoma developing in a sebaceous nevus of Jadassohn. report of a case. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:413‐415.
  10. Prieto VG, Shea CR, Celebi JK, et al. Adnexal tumors. In: Busam KJ. Dermatopathology: A Volume in the Foundations in Diagnostic Pathology Series. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2016:388-446.
  11. Tsunoda K, Onishi M, Maeda F, et al. Evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy for eccrine porocarcinoma. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99:691-692.
References
  1. Marone U, Caraco C, Anniciello AM, et al. Metastatic eccrine porocarcinoma: report of a case and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol. 2011;9:32.
  2. Blake PW, Bradford PT, Devesa SS, et al. Cutaneous appendageal carcinoma incidence and survival patterns in the United States: a population-based study. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146:625-632.
  3. Salih AM, Kakamad FH, Baba HO, et al. Porocarcinoma; presentation and management, a meta-analysis of 453 cases. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017;20:74-79.
  4. Ritter AM, Graham RS, Amaker B, et al. Intracranial extension of an eccrine porocarcinoma. case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:138-140.
  5. Khaja M, Ashraf U, Mehershahi S, et al. Recurrent metastatic eccrine porocarcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Case Rep. 2019;20:179-183.
  6. Sawaya JL, Khachemoune A. Poroma: a review of eccrine, apocrine, and malignant forms. Int J Dermatol. 2014;53:1053-1061.
  7. Lloyd MS, El-Muttardi N, Robson A. Eccrine porocarcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Can J Plast Surg. 2003;11:153-156.
  8. Robson A, Greene J, Ansari N, et al. Eccrine porocarcinoma (malignant eccrine poroma): a clinicopathologic study of 69 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:710-720.
  9. Tarkhan II, Domingo J. Metastasizing eccrine porocarcinoma developing in a sebaceous nevus of Jadassohn. report of a case. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:413‐415.
  10. Prieto VG, Shea CR, Celebi JK, et al. Adnexal tumors. In: Busam KJ. Dermatopathology: A Volume in the Foundations in Diagnostic Pathology Series. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2016:388-446.
  11. Tsunoda K, Onishi M, Maeda F, et al. Evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy for eccrine porocarcinoma. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99:691-692.
Issue
Cutis - 111(6)
Issue
Cutis - 111(6)
Page Number
E22-E24
Page Number
E22-E24
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Eccrine Porocarcinoma in 2 Patients
Display Headline
Eccrine Porocarcinoma in 2 Patients
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Eccrine porocarcinoma is a rare malignancy that clinically mimics other cutaneous malignancies.
  • Early histologic diagnosis is essential, as lymphatic metastasis is common and carries a 65% to 67% mortality rate.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media

Progressive Telangiectatic Rash

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 03/12/2021 - 13:59

The Diagnosis: Cutaneous Collagenous Vasculopathy 

Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy (CCV) is an idiopathic microangiopathy of the small vessels in the superficial dermis. A condition first identified by Salama and Rosenthal1 in 2000, CCV likely is underreported, as its clinical mimickers are not routinely biopsied.2 It presents as asymptomatic telangiectatic macules, initially on the lower extremities and often spreading to the trunk. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy often is seen in middle-aged adults, and most patients have comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or cardiovascular disease. The exact etiology of this disease is unknown.3,4 

Histopathologically, CCV is characterized by dilated superficial vessels with thickened eosinophilic walls. The eosinophilic material is composed of hyalinized type IV collagen, which is periodic acid-Schiff positive and diastase resistant (Figure 1).3,4 Stains for amyloid are negative.  

Figure 1. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy. Periodic acid– Schiff staining demonstrated hyalinized vessel walls (original magnification ×200).

Generalized essential telangiectasia (GET) is a condition that presents with symmetric, blanchable, erythematous telangiectases.5 These lesions can occur alone or can accompany systemic diseases. Similar to CCV, the telangiectases tend to begin on the legs before gradually spreading to the trunk; however, this process more often is seen in females and occurs at an earlier age. Unlike CCV, GET can occur on mucosal surfaces, with cases of conjunctival and oral involvement reported.6 Generalized essential telangiectasia usually is a diagnosis of exclusion.7,8 It is thought that many CCV lesions have been misclassified clinically as GET, which highlights the importance of biopsy. Microscopically, GET is distinct from CCV in that the superficial dermis lacks thick-walled vessels.5,7 Although usually not associated with systemic diseases or progressive morbidity, treatment options are limited.8 

Livedoid vasculopathy, also known as atrophie blanche, is caused by fibrin thrombi occlusion of dermal vessels. Clinically, patients have recurrent telangiectatic papules and painful ulcers on the lower extremities that gradually heal, leaving behind white stellate scars. It is caused by an underlying prothrombotic state with a superimposed inflammatory response.9 Livedoid vasculopathy primarily affects middle-aged women, and many patients have comorbidities such as scleroderma or systemic lupus erythematosus. Histologically, the epidermis often is ulcerated, and thrombi are visualized within small vessels. Eosinophilic fibrinoid material is deposited in vessel walls, including but not confined to vessels at the base of the epidermal ulcer (Figure 2). The fibrinoid material is periodic acid-Schiff positive and diastase resistant and can be highlighted with immunofluorescence, which may help to distinguish this entity from CCV.1,9 As the disease progresses, vessels are diffusely hyalinized, and there is epidermal atrophy and dermal sclerosis. Treatment options include antiplatelet and fibrinolytic drugs with a multidisciplinary approach to resolve pain and scarring.9 

Figure 2. Livedoid vasculopathy (atrophie blanche). Fibrin thrombi within small vessels and vessel walls with adjacent stasis changes due to the anatomic site (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Primary systemic amyloidosis is a rare condition, and cutaneous manifestations are seen in approximately one-third of affected individuals. Amyloid deposition results in waxy papules that predominantly affect the face and periorbital areas but also may occur on the neck, flexural areas, and genitalia.5 Because the amyloid deposits also can be found within vessel walls, hemorrhagic lesions may occur. Microscopically, amorphous eosinophilic material can be found within the vessel walls, similar to CCV (Figure 3A); however, when stained with Congo red, cutaneous amyloidosis shows waxy red-orange material involving the vessel walls and exhibits apple green birefringence under polarization (Figure 3B).10 Amyloid also will be negative for type IV collagen, fibronectin, and laminin, whereas CCV will be positive.5

Figure 3. Amyloidosis. A, Amorphous eosinophilic material within the vessel walls (H&E, original magnification ×200). B, Waxy redorange material involving vessel walls (Congo red, original magnification ×200).
 Stasis dermatitis is a result of chronic venous insufficiency and causes characteristic clinical and histopathologic findings. In contrast to CCV, where hyalinized type IV collagen is deposited within the vessel wall, plasma and fibrin are deposited around the walls of capillaries in stasis dermatitis.11 Additional microscopic findings of stasis dermatitis include superficial dermal angioplasia, hemorrhage, and hemosiderin deposition (Figure 4).  
Figure 4. Stasis dermatitis. Thickened vessel walls with superficial dermal angioplasia, hemorrhage, and hemosiderin deposition (H&E, original magnification ×100).

References
  1. Salama S, Rosenthal D. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy with generalized telangiectasia: an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. J Cutan Pathol. 2000;27:40-48. 
  2. Bondier L, Tardieu M, Leveque P, et al. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy: report of two cases presenting as disseminated telangiectasias and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2017;39:682-688. 
  3. Sartori DS, Almeida HL Jr, Dorn TV, et al. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy: light and transmission electron microscopy. An Bras Dermatol. 2019;94:211-213.  
  4. Brady BG, Ortleb M, Boyd AS, et al. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015;8:49-52. 
  5. Patterson JW, ed. Vascular tumors. Weedon's Skin Pathology. 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2016:1069-1115. 
  6. Knöpfel N, Martín-Santiago A, Saus C, et al. Extensive acquired telangiectasias: comparison of generalized essential telangiectasia and cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2017;108:E21-E26.  
  7. Karimkhani C, Boyers LN, Olivere J, et al. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy. Cutis. 2019;103:E7-E8. 
  8. McGrae JD, Winkelmann RK. Generalized essential telangiectasia: report of a clinical and histochemical study of 13 patients with acquired cutaneous lesions. JAMA. 1963;185:909-913.  
  9. Vasudeva B, Neema S, Verma R. Livedoid vasculopathy: a review of pathogenesis and principles of management. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2016;82:478. 
  10. Ko CJ, Barr RJ. Color--pink. In: Ko CJ, Barr RJ, eds. Dermatopathology: Diagnosis by First Impression. 3rd ed. Wiley; 2016:303-322. 
  11. Clark ML, McGuinness AE, Vidal CI. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy: a unique case with positive direct immunofluorescence findings. Am J Dermatopathol. 2019;41:77-79. 
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Drs. Hannay and Forcucci are from the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Dr. Mazza-McCrann is from the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Madison E. Hannay, DO, 165 Ashley Ave, CH236E, Charleston, SC 29425 ([email protected]). 

Issue
cutis - 107(3)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
119, 125-126
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Drs. Hannay and Forcucci are from the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Dr. Mazza-McCrann is from the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Madison E. Hannay, DO, 165 Ashley Ave, CH236E, Charleston, SC 29425 ([email protected]). 

Author and Disclosure Information

From the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Drs. Hannay and Forcucci are from the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Dr. Mazza-McCrann is from the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Madison E. Hannay, DO, 165 Ashley Ave, CH236E, Charleston, SC 29425 ([email protected]). 

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

The Diagnosis: Cutaneous Collagenous Vasculopathy 

Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy (CCV) is an idiopathic microangiopathy of the small vessels in the superficial dermis. A condition first identified by Salama and Rosenthal1 in 2000, CCV likely is underreported, as its clinical mimickers are not routinely biopsied.2 It presents as asymptomatic telangiectatic macules, initially on the lower extremities and often spreading to the trunk. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy often is seen in middle-aged adults, and most patients have comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or cardiovascular disease. The exact etiology of this disease is unknown.3,4 

Histopathologically, CCV is characterized by dilated superficial vessels with thickened eosinophilic walls. The eosinophilic material is composed of hyalinized type IV collagen, which is periodic acid-Schiff positive and diastase resistant (Figure 1).3,4 Stains for amyloid are negative.  

Figure 1. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy. Periodic acid– Schiff staining demonstrated hyalinized vessel walls (original magnification ×200).

Generalized essential telangiectasia (GET) is a condition that presents with symmetric, blanchable, erythematous telangiectases.5 These lesions can occur alone or can accompany systemic diseases. Similar to CCV, the telangiectases tend to begin on the legs before gradually spreading to the trunk; however, this process more often is seen in females and occurs at an earlier age. Unlike CCV, GET can occur on mucosal surfaces, with cases of conjunctival and oral involvement reported.6 Generalized essential telangiectasia usually is a diagnosis of exclusion.7,8 It is thought that many CCV lesions have been misclassified clinically as GET, which highlights the importance of biopsy. Microscopically, GET is distinct from CCV in that the superficial dermis lacks thick-walled vessels.5,7 Although usually not associated with systemic diseases or progressive morbidity, treatment options are limited.8 

Livedoid vasculopathy, also known as atrophie blanche, is caused by fibrin thrombi occlusion of dermal vessels. Clinically, patients have recurrent telangiectatic papules and painful ulcers on the lower extremities that gradually heal, leaving behind white stellate scars. It is caused by an underlying prothrombotic state with a superimposed inflammatory response.9 Livedoid vasculopathy primarily affects middle-aged women, and many patients have comorbidities such as scleroderma or systemic lupus erythematosus. Histologically, the epidermis often is ulcerated, and thrombi are visualized within small vessels. Eosinophilic fibrinoid material is deposited in vessel walls, including but not confined to vessels at the base of the epidermal ulcer (Figure 2). The fibrinoid material is periodic acid-Schiff positive and diastase resistant and can be highlighted with immunofluorescence, which may help to distinguish this entity from CCV.1,9 As the disease progresses, vessels are diffusely hyalinized, and there is epidermal atrophy and dermal sclerosis. Treatment options include antiplatelet and fibrinolytic drugs with a multidisciplinary approach to resolve pain and scarring.9 

Figure 2. Livedoid vasculopathy (atrophie blanche). Fibrin thrombi within small vessels and vessel walls with adjacent stasis changes due to the anatomic site (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Primary systemic amyloidosis is a rare condition, and cutaneous manifestations are seen in approximately one-third of affected individuals. Amyloid deposition results in waxy papules that predominantly affect the face and periorbital areas but also may occur on the neck, flexural areas, and genitalia.5 Because the amyloid deposits also can be found within vessel walls, hemorrhagic lesions may occur. Microscopically, amorphous eosinophilic material can be found within the vessel walls, similar to CCV (Figure 3A); however, when stained with Congo red, cutaneous amyloidosis shows waxy red-orange material involving the vessel walls and exhibits apple green birefringence under polarization (Figure 3B).10 Amyloid also will be negative for type IV collagen, fibronectin, and laminin, whereas CCV will be positive.5

Figure 3. Amyloidosis. A, Amorphous eosinophilic material within the vessel walls (H&E, original magnification ×200). B, Waxy redorange material involving vessel walls (Congo red, original magnification ×200).
 Stasis dermatitis is a result of chronic venous insufficiency and causes characteristic clinical and histopathologic findings. In contrast to CCV, where hyalinized type IV collagen is deposited within the vessel wall, plasma and fibrin are deposited around the walls of capillaries in stasis dermatitis.11 Additional microscopic findings of stasis dermatitis include superficial dermal angioplasia, hemorrhage, and hemosiderin deposition (Figure 4).  
Figure 4. Stasis dermatitis. Thickened vessel walls with superficial dermal angioplasia, hemorrhage, and hemosiderin deposition (H&E, original magnification ×100).

The Diagnosis: Cutaneous Collagenous Vasculopathy 

Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy (CCV) is an idiopathic microangiopathy of the small vessels in the superficial dermis. A condition first identified by Salama and Rosenthal1 in 2000, CCV likely is underreported, as its clinical mimickers are not routinely biopsied.2 It presents as asymptomatic telangiectatic macules, initially on the lower extremities and often spreading to the trunk. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy often is seen in middle-aged adults, and most patients have comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or cardiovascular disease. The exact etiology of this disease is unknown.3,4 

Histopathologically, CCV is characterized by dilated superficial vessels with thickened eosinophilic walls. The eosinophilic material is composed of hyalinized type IV collagen, which is periodic acid-Schiff positive and diastase resistant (Figure 1).3,4 Stains for amyloid are negative.  

Figure 1. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy. Periodic acid– Schiff staining demonstrated hyalinized vessel walls (original magnification ×200).

Generalized essential telangiectasia (GET) is a condition that presents with symmetric, blanchable, erythematous telangiectases.5 These lesions can occur alone or can accompany systemic diseases. Similar to CCV, the telangiectases tend to begin on the legs before gradually spreading to the trunk; however, this process more often is seen in females and occurs at an earlier age. Unlike CCV, GET can occur on mucosal surfaces, with cases of conjunctival and oral involvement reported.6 Generalized essential telangiectasia usually is a diagnosis of exclusion.7,8 It is thought that many CCV lesions have been misclassified clinically as GET, which highlights the importance of biopsy. Microscopically, GET is distinct from CCV in that the superficial dermis lacks thick-walled vessels.5,7 Although usually not associated with systemic diseases or progressive morbidity, treatment options are limited.8 

Livedoid vasculopathy, also known as atrophie blanche, is caused by fibrin thrombi occlusion of dermal vessels. Clinically, patients have recurrent telangiectatic papules and painful ulcers on the lower extremities that gradually heal, leaving behind white stellate scars. It is caused by an underlying prothrombotic state with a superimposed inflammatory response.9 Livedoid vasculopathy primarily affects middle-aged women, and many patients have comorbidities such as scleroderma or systemic lupus erythematosus. Histologically, the epidermis often is ulcerated, and thrombi are visualized within small vessels. Eosinophilic fibrinoid material is deposited in vessel walls, including but not confined to vessels at the base of the epidermal ulcer (Figure 2). The fibrinoid material is periodic acid-Schiff positive and diastase resistant and can be highlighted with immunofluorescence, which may help to distinguish this entity from CCV.1,9 As the disease progresses, vessels are diffusely hyalinized, and there is epidermal atrophy and dermal sclerosis. Treatment options include antiplatelet and fibrinolytic drugs with a multidisciplinary approach to resolve pain and scarring.9 

Figure 2. Livedoid vasculopathy (atrophie blanche). Fibrin thrombi within small vessels and vessel walls with adjacent stasis changes due to the anatomic site (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Primary systemic amyloidosis is a rare condition, and cutaneous manifestations are seen in approximately one-third of affected individuals. Amyloid deposition results in waxy papules that predominantly affect the face and periorbital areas but also may occur on the neck, flexural areas, and genitalia.5 Because the amyloid deposits also can be found within vessel walls, hemorrhagic lesions may occur. Microscopically, amorphous eosinophilic material can be found within the vessel walls, similar to CCV (Figure 3A); however, when stained with Congo red, cutaneous amyloidosis shows waxy red-orange material involving the vessel walls and exhibits apple green birefringence under polarization (Figure 3B).10 Amyloid also will be negative for type IV collagen, fibronectin, and laminin, whereas CCV will be positive.5

Figure 3. Amyloidosis. A, Amorphous eosinophilic material within the vessel walls (H&E, original magnification ×200). B, Waxy redorange material involving vessel walls (Congo red, original magnification ×200).
 Stasis dermatitis is a result of chronic venous insufficiency and causes characteristic clinical and histopathologic findings. In contrast to CCV, where hyalinized type IV collagen is deposited within the vessel wall, plasma and fibrin are deposited around the walls of capillaries in stasis dermatitis.11 Additional microscopic findings of stasis dermatitis include superficial dermal angioplasia, hemorrhage, and hemosiderin deposition (Figure 4).  
Figure 4. Stasis dermatitis. Thickened vessel walls with superficial dermal angioplasia, hemorrhage, and hemosiderin deposition (H&E, original magnification ×100).

References
  1. Salama S, Rosenthal D. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy with generalized telangiectasia: an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. J Cutan Pathol. 2000;27:40-48. 
  2. Bondier L, Tardieu M, Leveque P, et al. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy: report of two cases presenting as disseminated telangiectasias and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2017;39:682-688. 
  3. Sartori DS, Almeida HL Jr, Dorn TV, et al. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy: light and transmission electron microscopy. An Bras Dermatol. 2019;94:211-213.  
  4. Brady BG, Ortleb M, Boyd AS, et al. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015;8:49-52. 
  5. Patterson JW, ed. Vascular tumors. Weedon's Skin Pathology. 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2016:1069-1115. 
  6. Knöpfel N, Martín-Santiago A, Saus C, et al. Extensive acquired telangiectasias: comparison of generalized essential telangiectasia and cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2017;108:E21-E26.  
  7. Karimkhani C, Boyers LN, Olivere J, et al. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy. Cutis. 2019;103:E7-E8. 
  8. McGrae JD, Winkelmann RK. Generalized essential telangiectasia: report of a clinical and histochemical study of 13 patients with acquired cutaneous lesions. JAMA. 1963;185:909-913.  
  9. Vasudeva B, Neema S, Verma R. Livedoid vasculopathy: a review of pathogenesis and principles of management. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2016;82:478. 
  10. Ko CJ, Barr RJ. Color--pink. In: Ko CJ, Barr RJ, eds. Dermatopathology: Diagnosis by First Impression. 3rd ed. Wiley; 2016:303-322. 
  11. Clark ML, McGuinness AE, Vidal CI. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy: a unique case with positive direct immunofluorescence findings. Am J Dermatopathol. 2019;41:77-79. 
References
  1. Salama S, Rosenthal D. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy with generalized telangiectasia: an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. J Cutan Pathol. 2000;27:40-48. 
  2. Bondier L, Tardieu M, Leveque P, et al. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy: report of two cases presenting as disseminated telangiectasias and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2017;39:682-688. 
  3. Sartori DS, Almeida HL Jr, Dorn TV, et al. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy: light and transmission electron microscopy. An Bras Dermatol. 2019;94:211-213.  
  4. Brady BG, Ortleb M, Boyd AS, et al. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015;8:49-52. 
  5. Patterson JW, ed. Vascular tumors. Weedon's Skin Pathology. 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2016:1069-1115. 
  6. Knöpfel N, Martín-Santiago A, Saus C, et al. Extensive acquired telangiectasias: comparison of generalized essential telangiectasia and cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2017;108:E21-E26.  
  7. Karimkhani C, Boyers LN, Olivere J, et al. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy. Cutis. 2019;103:E7-E8. 
  8. McGrae JD, Winkelmann RK. Generalized essential telangiectasia: report of a clinical and histochemical study of 13 patients with acquired cutaneous lesions. JAMA. 1963;185:909-913.  
  9. Vasudeva B, Neema S, Verma R. Livedoid vasculopathy: a review of pathogenesis and principles of management. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2016;82:478. 
  10. Ko CJ, Barr RJ. Color--pink. In: Ko CJ, Barr RJ, eds. Dermatopathology: Diagnosis by First Impression. 3rd ed. Wiley; 2016:303-322. 
  11. Clark ML, McGuinness AE, Vidal CI. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy: a unique case with positive direct immunofluorescence findings. Am J Dermatopathol. 2019;41:77-79. 
Issue
cutis - 107(3)
Issue
cutis - 107(3)
Page Number
119, 125-126
Page Number
119, 125-126
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Questionnaire Body

H&E, original magnification ×200 (clinical appearance of telangiectatic rash on the left leg [inset]).

A 54-year-old woman presented with purple-red vessels on the lower legs of 15 years’ duration with gradual proximal progression to involve the thighs, breasts, and forearms. A punch biopsy of the inner thigh was obtained for histopathologic evaluation.

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Fri, 03/12/2021 - 11:30
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 03/12/2021 - 11:30
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 03/12/2021 - 11:30
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Article PDF Media

Tender White Lesions on the Groin

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 04/29/2020 - 16:22
Display Headline
Tender White Lesions on the Groin

The Diagnosis: Candidal Intertrigo  

The biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of severe hyperkeratotic candidal intertrigo with no evidence of Hailey-Hailey disease. Hematoxylin and eosin- stained sections demonstrated irregular acanthosis and variable spongiosis. The stratum corneum was predominantly orthokeratotic with overlying psuedohyphae and yeast fungal elements (Figure 1). 

Figure 1. Irregular acanthosis and variable spongiosis. The stratum corneum was predominantly orthokeratotic. On higher magnification, yeast forms and pseudohyphae diagnostic of Candida albicans were appreciated (H&E, original magnification ×100; inset: H&E oil immersion, original magnification ×1000).

Hyperimmunoglobulinemia E syndrome (HIES), also known as hyper-IgE syndrome or Job syndrome, is a rare immunodeficiency disorder characterized by an eczematous dermatitis-like rash, recurrent skin and lung abscesses, eosinophilia, and elevated serum IgE. Facial asymmetry, prominent forehead, deep-set eyes, broad nose, and roughened facial skin with large pores are characteristic of the sporadic and autosomal-recessive forms. Other common findings include retained primary teeth, hyperextensible joints, and recurrent mucocutaneous candidiasis.

Although autosomal-dominant and autosomal-recessive inheritance patterns exist, sporadic mutations are the most common cause of HIES.2 Several genes have been implicated depending on the inheritance pattern. The majority of autosomal-dominant cases are associated with inactivating STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) mutations, whereas the majority of autosomal-recessive cases are associated with inactivating DOCK8 (dedicator of cytokinesis 8) mutations.1 Ultimately, all of these mutations lead to an impaired helper T cell (TH17) response, which is crucial for clearing fungal and extracellular bacterial infections.3  

Skin eruptions typically are the first manifestation of HIES; they appear within the first week to month of life as papulopustular eruptions on the face and scalp and rapidly generalize to the rest of the body, favoring the shoulders, arms, chest, and buttocks. The pustules then coalesce into crusted plaques that resemble atopic dermatitis, frequently with superimposed Staphylococcus aureus infection. On microscopy, the pustules are folliculocentric and often contain eosinophils, whereas the plaques may contain intraepidermal collections of eosinophils.1 

Mucocutaneous candidiasis is seen in approximately 60% of HIES cases and is closely linked to STAT3 inactivating mutations.3 Histologically, there is marked acanthosis with neutrophil exocytosis and abundant yeast and pseudohyphal forms within the stratum corneum (Figure 2).4 Cutaneous candidal infections typically require both oral and topical antifungal agents to clear the infection.3 Most cases of mucocutaneous candidiasis are caused by Candida albicans; however, other known culprits include Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida krusei.5,6 Of note, species identification and antifungal susceptibility studies may be useful in refractory cases, especially with C glabrata, which is known to acquire resistance to azoles, such as fluconazole, with emerging resistance to echinocandins.6  

Figure 2. A, The epidermis displayed irregular acanthosis and variable spongiosis. The stratum corneum was predominantly orthokeratotic with overlying fungal elements (H&E, original magnification ×100). B, Closer view of the cornified layer showed pseudohyphae and budding yeast (H&E oil immersion, original magnification ×1000).

The differential diagnosis of this groin eruption included Hailey-Hailey disease; pemphigus vegetans, Hallopeau type; tinea cruris; and inverse psoriasis. Hailey-Hailey disease can be complicated by a superimposed candidal infection with similar clinical features, and biopsy may be required for definitive diagnosis. Hailey-Hailey disease typically presents with macerated fissured plaques that resemble macerated tissue paper with red fissures (Figure 3). Biopsy confirms full-thickness acantholysis resembling a dilapidated brick wall with minimal dyskeratosis.1 Pemphigus vegetans is a localized variant of pemphigus vulgaris with a predilection for flexural surfaces. The lesions progress to vegetating erosive plaques.4 The Hallopeau type often is studded with pustules and typically remains more localized than the Neumann type. Direct immunofluorescence demonstrates intercellular deposition of IgG and C3, and routine sections characteristically show pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia with intraepidermal eosinophilic microabscesses.1,4 Tinea cruris is characterized by erythematous annular lesions with raised scaly borders spreading down the inner thighs.7 The epidermis is variably spongiotic with parakeratosis, and neutrophils often present in a layered stratum corneum with basketweave keratin above a layer of more compact and eosinophilic keratin. Fungal stains, such as periodic acid-Schiff, will highlight the fungal hyphae within the stratum corneum. The inguinal folds are a typical location for inverse psoriasis, which generally appears as thin, sharply demarcated, shiny red plaques with less scale than plaque psoriasis.1 Psoriasiform hyperplasia with a diminished granular layer and tortuous papillary dermal vessels would be expected histologically.1 

Figure 3. Hailey-Hailey disease with superimposed candidal infection. White macerated scale was seen overlying a large pink plaque and a smaller satellite pink scaly plaque in the groin.

References
  1. James WD, Berger TG, Elston DM. Andrews' Diseases of the Skin. 12th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2016. 
  2. Schwartz RA, Tarlow MM. Dermatologic manifestations of Job syndrome. Medscape website. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1050852-overview. Updated April 22, 2019. Accessed March 28, 2020. 
  3. Minegishi Y, Saito M. Cutaneous manifestations of hyper IgE syndrome. Allergol Int. 2012;61:191-196. 
  4. Patterson JW. Weedon's Skin Pathology. 4th ed. China: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2016. 
  5. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, et al. Executive summary: clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:409-417. 
  6. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Antifungal resistance. https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/antifungal-resistance.html. Updated March 17, 2020. Accessed April 20, 2020.  
  7. Tinea cruris. DermNet NZ website. https://www.dermnetnz.org/topics/tinea-cruris/. Published 2003. Accessed March 28, 2020. 
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Drs. O’Connor and Forcucci are from the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Drs. Zimmer and Elston are from the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Heather M. O’Connor, DO, Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 171 Ashley Ave, MSC908, Charleston, SC 29425 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 105(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E28-E30
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Drs. O’Connor and Forcucci are from the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Drs. Zimmer and Elston are from the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Heather M. O’Connor, DO, Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 171 Ashley Ave, MSC908, Charleston, SC 29425 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

From the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Drs. O’Connor and Forcucci are from the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Drs. Zimmer and Elston are from the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Heather M. O’Connor, DO, Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 171 Ashley Ave, MSC908, Charleston, SC 29425 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

The Diagnosis: Candidal Intertrigo  

The biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of severe hyperkeratotic candidal intertrigo with no evidence of Hailey-Hailey disease. Hematoxylin and eosin- stained sections demonstrated irregular acanthosis and variable spongiosis. The stratum corneum was predominantly orthokeratotic with overlying psuedohyphae and yeast fungal elements (Figure 1). 

Figure 1. Irregular acanthosis and variable spongiosis. The stratum corneum was predominantly orthokeratotic. On higher magnification, yeast forms and pseudohyphae diagnostic of Candida albicans were appreciated (H&E, original magnification ×100; inset: H&E oil immersion, original magnification ×1000).

Hyperimmunoglobulinemia E syndrome (HIES), also known as hyper-IgE syndrome or Job syndrome, is a rare immunodeficiency disorder characterized by an eczematous dermatitis-like rash, recurrent skin and lung abscesses, eosinophilia, and elevated serum IgE. Facial asymmetry, prominent forehead, deep-set eyes, broad nose, and roughened facial skin with large pores are characteristic of the sporadic and autosomal-recessive forms. Other common findings include retained primary teeth, hyperextensible joints, and recurrent mucocutaneous candidiasis.

Although autosomal-dominant and autosomal-recessive inheritance patterns exist, sporadic mutations are the most common cause of HIES.2 Several genes have been implicated depending on the inheritance pattern. The majority of autosomal-dominant cases are associated with inactivating STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) mutations, whereas the majority of autosomal-recessive cases are associated with inactivating DOCK8 (dedicator of cytokinesis 8) mutations.1 Ultimately, all of these mutations lead to an impaired helper T cell (TH17) response, which is crucial for clearing fungal and extracellular bacterial infections.3  

Skin eruptions typically are the first manifestation of HIES; they appear within the first week to month of life as papulopustular eruptions on the face and scalp and rapidly generalize to the rest of the body, favoring the shoulders, arms, chest, and buttocks. The pustules then coalesce into crusted plaques that resemble atopic dermatitis, frequently with superimposed Staphylococcus aureus infection. On microscopy, the pustules are folliculocentric and often contain eosinophils, whereas the plaques may contain intraepidermal collections of eosinophils.1 

Mucocutaneous candidiasis is seen in approximately 60% of HIES cases and is closely linked to STAT3 inactivating mutations.3 Histologically, there is marked acanthosis with neutrophil exocytosis and abundant yeast and pseudohyphal forms within the stratum corneum (Figure 2).4 Cutaneous candidal infections typically require both oral and topical antifungal agents to clear the infection.3 Most cases of mucocutaneous candidiasis are caused by Candida albicans; however, other known culprits include Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida krusei.5,6 Of note, species identification and antifungal susceptibility studies may be useful in refractory cases, especially with C glabrata, which is known to acquire resistance to azoles, such as fluconazole, with emerging resistance to echinocandins.6  

Figure 2. A, The epidermis displayed irregular acanthosis and variable spongiosis. The stratum corneum was predominantly orthokeratotic with overlying fungal elements (H&E, original magnification ×100). B, Closer view of the cornified layer showed pseudohyphae and budding yeast (H&E oil immersion, original magnification ×1000).

The differential diagnosis of this groin eruption included Hailey-Hailey disease; pemphigus vegetans, Hallopeau type; tinea cruris; and inverse psoriasis. Hailey-Hailey disease can be complicated by a superimposed candidal infection with similar clinical features, and biopsy may be required for definitive diagnosis. Hailey-Hailey disease typically presents with macerated fissured plaques that resemble macerated tissue paper with red fissures (Figure 3). Biopsy confirms full-thickness acantholysis resembling a dilapidated brick wall with minimal dyskeratosis.1 Pemphigus vegetans is a localized variant of pemphigus vulgaris with a predilection for flexural surfaces. The lesions progress to vegetating erosive plaques.4 The Hallopeau type often is studded with pustules and typically remains more localized than the Neumann type. Direct immunofluorescence demonstrates intercellular deposition of IgG and C3, and routine sections characteristically show pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia with intraepidermal eosinophilic microabscesses.1,4 Tinea cruris is characterized by erythematous annular lesions with raised scaly borders spreading down the inner thighs.7 The epidermis is variably spongiotic with parakeratosis, and neutrophils often present in a layered stratum corneum with basketweave keratin above a layer of more compact and eosinophilic keratin. Fungal stains, such as periodic acid-Schiff, will highlight the fungal hyphae within the stratum corneum. The inguinal folds are a typical location for inverse psoriasis, which generally appears as thin, sharply demarcated, shiny red plaques with less scale than plaque psoriasis.1 Psoriasiform hyperplasia with a diminished granular layer and tortuous papillary dermal vessels would be expected histologically.1 

Figure 3. Hailey-Hailey disease with superimposed candidal infection. White macerated scale was seen overlying a large pink plaque and a smaller satellite pink scaly plaque in the groin.

The Diagnosis: Candidal Intertrigo  

The biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of severe hyperkeratotic candidal intertrigo with no evidence of Hailey-Hailey disease. Hematoxylin and eosin- stained sections demonstrated irregular acanthosis and variable spongiosis. The stratum corneum was predominantly orthokeratotic with overlying psuedohyphae and yeast fungal elements (Figure 1). 

Figure 1. Irregular acanthosis and variable spongiosis. The stratum corneum was predominantly orthokeratotic. On higher magnification, yeast forms and pseudohyphae diagnostic of Candida albicans were appreciated (H&E, original magnification ×100; inset: H&E oil immersion, original magnification ×1000).

Hyperimmunoglobulinemia E syndrome (HIES), also known as hyper-IgE syndrome or Job syndrome, is a rare immunodeficiency disorder characterized by an eczematous dermatitis-like rash, recurrent skin and lung abscesses, eosinophilia, and elevated serum IgE. Facial asymmetry, prominent forehead, deep-set eyes, broad nose, and roughened facial skin with large pores are characteristic of the sporadic and autosomal-recessive forms. Other common findings include retained primary teeth, hyperextensible joints, and recurrent mucocutaneous candidiasis.

Although autosomal-dominant and autosomal-recessive inheritance patterns exist, sporadic mutations are the most common cause of HIES.2 Several genes have been implicated depending on the inheritance pattern. The majority of autosomal-dominant cases are associated with inactivating STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) mutations, whereas the majority of autosomal-recessive cases are associated with inactivating DOCK8 (dedicator of cytokinesis 8) mutations.1 Ultimately, all of these mutations lead to an impaired helper T cell (TH17) response, which is crucial for clearing fungal and extracellular bacterial infections.3  

Skin eruptions typically are the first manifestation of HIES; they appear within the first week to month of life as papulopustular eruptions on the face and scalp and rapidly generalize to the rest of the body, favoring the shoulders, arms, chest, and buttocks. The pustules then coalesce into crusted plaques that resemble atopic dermatitis, frequently with superimposed Staphylococcus aureus infection. On microscopy, the pustules are folliculocentric and often contain eosinophils, whereas the plaques may contain intraepidermal collections of eosinophils.1 

Mucocutaneous candidiasis is seen in approximately 60% of HIES cases and is closely linked to STAT3 inactivating mutations.3 Histologically, there is marked acanthosis with neutrophil exocytosis and abundant yeast and pseudohyphal forms within the stratum corneum (Figure 2).4 Cutaneous candidal infections typically require both oral and topical antifungal agents to clear the infection.3 Most cases of mucocutaneous candidiasis are caused by Candida albicans; however, other known culprits include Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida krusei.5,6 Of note, species identification and antifungal susceptibility studies may be useful in refractory cases, especially with C glabrata, which is known to acquire resistance to azoles, such as fluconazole, with emerging resistance to echinocandins.6  

Figure 2. A, The epidermis displayed irregular acanthosis and variable spongiosis. The stratum corneum was predominantly orthokeratotic with overlying fungal elements (H&E, original magnification ×100). B, Closer view of the cornified layer showed pseudohyphae and budding yeast (H&E oil immersion, original magnification ×1000).

The differential diagnosis of this groin eruption included Hailey-Hailey disease; pemphigus vegetans, Hallopeau type; tinea cruris; and inverse psoriasis. Hailey-Hailey disease can be complicated by a superimposed candidal infection with similar clinical features, and biopsy may be required for definitive diagnosis. Hailey-Hailey disease typically presents with macerated fissured plaques that resemble macerated tissue paper with red fissures (Figure 3). Biopsy confirms full-thickness acantholysis resembling a dilapidated brick wall with minimal dyskeratosis.1 Pemphigus vegetans is a localized variant of pemphigus vulgaris with a predilection for flexural surfaces. The lesions progress to vegetating erosive plaques.4 The Hallopeau type often is studded with pustules and typically remains more localized than the Neumann type. Direct immunofluorescence demonstrates intercellular deposition of IgG and C3, and routine sections characteristically show pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia with intraepidermal eosinophilic microabscesses.1,4 Tinea cruris is characterized by erythematous annular lesions with raised scaly borders spreading down the inner thighs.7 The epidermis is variably spongiotic with parakeratosis, and neutrophils often present in a layered stratum corneum with basketweave keratin above a layer of more compact and eosinophilic keratin. Fungal stains, such as periodic acid-Schiff, will highlight the fungal hyphae within the stratum corneum. The inguinal folds are a typical location for inverse psoriasis, which generally appears as thin, sharply demarcated, shiny red plaques with less scale than plaque psoriasis.1 Psoriasiform hyperplasia with a diminished granular layer and tortuous papillary dermal vessels would be expected histologically.1 

Figure 3. Hailey-Hailey disease with superimposed candidal infection. White macerated scale was seen overlying a large pink plaque and a smaller satellite pink scaly plaque in the groin.

References
  1. James WD, Berger TG, Elston DM. Andrews' Diseases of the Skin. 12th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2016. 
  2. Schwartz RA, Tarlow MM. Dermatologic manifestations of Job syndrome. Medscape website. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1050852-overview. Updated April 22, 2019. Accessed March 28, 2020. 
  3. Minegishi Y, Saito M. Cutaneous manifestations of hyper IgE syndrome. Allergol Int. 2012;61:191-196. 
  4. Patterson JW. Weedon's Skin Pathology. 4th ed. China: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2016. 
  5. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, et al. Executive summary: clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:409-417. 
  6. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Antifungal resistance. https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/antifungal-resistance.html. Updated March 17, 2020. Accessed April 20, 2020.  
  7. Tinea cruris. DermNet NZ website. https://www.dermnetnz.org/topics/tinea-cruris/. Published 2003. Accessed March 28, 2020. 
References
  1. James WD, Berger TG, Elston DM. Andrews' Diseases of the Skin. 12th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2016. 
  2. Schwartz RA, Tarlow MM. Dermatologic manifestations of Job syndrome. Medscape website. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1050852-overview. Updated April 22, 2019. Accessed March 28, 2020. 
  3. Minegishi Y, Saito M. Cutaneous manifestations of hyper IgE syndrome. Allergol Int. 2012;61:191-196. 
  4. Patterson JW. Weedon's Skin Pathology. 4th ed. China: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2016. 
  5. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, et al. Executive summary: clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:409-417. 
  6. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Antifungal resistance. https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/antifungal-resistance.html. Updated March 17, 2020. Accessed April 20, 2020.  
  7. Tinea cruris. DermNet NZ website. https://www.dermnetnz.org/topics/tinea-cruris/. Published 2003. Accessed March 28, 2020. 
Issue
Cutis - 105(4)
Issue
Cutis - 105(4)
Page Number
E28-E30
Page Number
E28-E30
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Tender White Lesions on the Groin
Display Headline
Tender White Lesions on the Groin
Sections
Questionnaire Body

A 28-year-old man with a history of hyperimmunoglobulinemia E syndrome (previously known as Job syndrome), coarse facial features, and multiple skin and soft tissue infections presented to the university dermatology clinic with persistent white, macerated, fissured groin plaques that were present for months. The lesions were tender and pruritic with a burning sensation. Treatment with topical terbinafine and oral fluconazole was attempted without resolution of the eruption. A biopsy of the groin lesion was performed.  

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 04/29/2020 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 04/29/2020 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Wed, 04/29/2020 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Article PDF Media

Solitary Nodule on the Thigh

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 05/22/2019 - 09:21
Display Headline
Solitary Nodule on the Thigh

The Diagnosis: Ruptured Molluscum

Molluscum contagiosum (MC) is caused by a DNA virus (MC virus) belonging to the poxvirus family. Molluscum contagiosum is common and predominantly seen in children and young adults. In sexually active adults, the lesions commonly occur in the genital region, abdomen, and inner thighs. In immunocompromised individuals, including those with AIDS, the lesions are more extensive and may cause disfigurement.1 Molluscum contagiosum involving epidermoid cysts has been reported.2

Histopathologically, MC can be classified as noninflammatory or inflammatory. In noninflamed lesions, multiple large, intracytoplasmic, eosinophilic inclusions (Henderson-Paterson bodies) appear within the lobulated endophytic and hyperplastic epidermis. Ultrastructurally, these bodies show membrane-bound collections of MC virus.1 Replicating Henderson-Paterson bodies can result in rupture and inflammation. This case demonstrates a palisading granuloma containing keratin with few Henderson-Paterson bodies (quiz image) due to prior rupture of a molluscum or molluscoid cyst.

Rheumatoid nodules, the most characteristic histopathologic lesions of rheumatoid arthritis, are most commonly found in the subcutis at points of pressure and may occur in connective tissue of numerous organs. Rheumatoid nodules are firm, nontender, and mobile within the subcutaneous tissue but may be fixed to underlying structures including the periosteum, tendons, or bursae.3,4 Occasionally, superficial nodules may perforate the epidermis.5 The inner central necrobiotic zone appears as intensely eosinophilic, amorphous fibrin and other cellular debris. This central area is surrounded by histiocytes in a palisaded configuration (Figure 1). Multinucleated foreign body giant cells also may be present. Occasionally, mast cells, eosinophils, and neutrophils are present.6,7

Figure 1. Rheumatoid nodule histopathology with a central fibrinous area surrounded by histiocytes in a palisaded pattern (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei presents with multiple discrete, smooth, yellow-brown to red, dome-shaped papules. The lesions typically are located on the central and lateral sides of the face and infrequently involve the neck. Other sites including the axillae, arms, hands, legs, and groin occasionally can be involved. Diascopy may reveal an apple jelly color.8,9 The histopathologic hallmark of lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei is an epithelioid cell granuloma with central necrosis (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei histopathology with palisading epithelioid cell granuloma with central necrosis (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is a soft tissue tumor with a known propensity for local recurrence, regional lymph node involvement, sporotrichoid spread, and distant metastases.10 The name was coined by Enzinger11 in 1970 during a review of 62 cases of a “peculiar form of sarcoma that has repeatedly been confused with a chronic inflammatory process, a necrotizing granuloma, and a squamous cell carcinoma.” Epithelioid sarcoma tends to grow slowly in a nodular or multinodular manner along fascial structures and tendons, often with central necrosis and ulceration of the overlying skin. Histopathologically, classic ES shows nodular masses of uniform plump epithelioid cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent central necrosis. A biphasic pattern is typical with spindle cells merging with epithelioid cells. Cellular atypia is relatively mild and mitoses are rare (Figure 3). Recurrent or metastatic lesions can show a greater degree of pleomorphism.12 Given the low-grade atypia in early lesions, this sarcoma is easily misdiagnosed as granulomatous dermatitis. Immunohistochemically, the majority of ES cases are positive for cytokeratins and epithelial membrane antigen; SMARCB1/INI-1 expression is characteristically lost.13

Figure 3. Epithelioid sarcoma histopathology with plump epithelioid and spindled cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent necrosis (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (formerly Wegener granulomatosis) is an autoimmune vasculitis highly associated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Clinical manifestations include systemic necrotizing vasculitis; necrotizing glomerulonephritis; and granulomatous inflammation, which predominantly involves the upper respiratory tract, skin, and mucosa.14,15 Skin involvement may be the initial manifestation of the disease and consists of palpable purpura, papules, ulcerations, vesicles, subcutaneous nodules, necrotizing ulcerations, papulonecrotic lesions, and petechiae. None of the findings are pathognomonic. The cutaneous histopathologic spectrum includes leukocytoclastic vasculitis, extravascular palisading granulomas, and granulomatous vasculitis.16 In the acute lesions of granulomatosis with polyangiitis, the predominant pattern of inflammation is not granulomatous but purulent with the appearance of an abscess. As it evolves, it develops a central zone of necrosis with extensive karyorrhectic debris and palisades of macrophages with scattered multinucleated giant cells (Figure 4).17

Figure 4. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis histopathology with necrosis and palisades of macrophages with scattered multinucleated giant cells with a central neutrophilic infiltrate (H&E, original magnification ×100).

 

 

 

References

1. Nandhini G, Rajkumar K, Kanth KS, et al. Molluscum contagiosum in a 12-year-old child—report of a case and review of literature. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7:63-66.

2. Phelps A, Murphy M, Elaba Z, et al. Molluscum contagiosum virus infection in benign cutaneous epithelial cystic lesions-report of 2 cases with different pathogenesis? Am J Dermatopathol. 2010;32:740-742.

3. Sayah A, English JC 3rd. Rheumatoid arthritis: a review of the cutaneous manifestations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53:191-209; quiz 210-192.

4. Sibbitt WL Jr, Williams RC Jr. Cutaneous manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Dermatol. 1982;21:563-572.

5. Barzilai A, Huszar M, Shpiro D, et al. Pseudorheumatoid nodules in adults: a juxta-articular form of nodular granuloma annulare. Am J Dermatopathol. 2005;27:1-5.

6. Garcia-Patos V. Rheumatoid nodule. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2007;26:100-107.

7. Patterson JW. Rheumatoid nodule and subcutaneous granuloma annulare. a comparative histologic study. Am J Dermatopathol. 1988;10:1-8.

8. Sehgal VN, Srivastava G, Aggarwal AK, et al. Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei part II: an overview. Skinmed. 2005;4:234-238.

9. Cymerman R, Rosenstein R, Shvartsbeyn M, et al. Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei. Dermatol Online J. 2015;21. pii:13030/qt6b83q5gp.

10. Sobanko JF, Meijer L, Nigra TP. Epithelioid sarcoma: a review and update. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2009;2:49-54.

11. Enzinger FM. Epitheloid sarcoma. a sarcoma simulating a granuloma or a carcinoma. Cancer. 1970;26:1029-1041.

12. Fisher C. Epithelioid sarcoma of Enzinger. Adv Anat Pathol. 2006;13:114-121.

13. Miettinen M, Fanburg-Smith JC, Virolainen M, et al. Epithelioid sarcoma: an immunohistochemical analysis of 112 classical and variant cases and a discussion of the differential diagnosis. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:934-942.

14. Lutalo PM, D’Cruz DP. Diagnosis and classification of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (aka Wegener’s granulomatosis)[published online January 29, 2014]. J Autoimmun. 2014;48-49:94-98.

15. Frances C, Du LT, Piette JC, et al. Wegener’s granulomatosis. dermatological manifestations in 75 cases with clinicopathologic correlation. Arch Dermatol. 1994;130:861-867.

16. Daoud MS, Gibson LE, DeRemee RA, et al. Cutaneous Wegener’s granulomatosis: clinical, histopathologic, and immunopathologic features of thirty patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;31:605-612.

17. Jennette JC. Nomenclature and classification of vasculitis: lessons learned from granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s granulomatosis). Clin Exp Immunol. 2011;164 (suppl 1):7-10.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Wu is from the Department of Dermatology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China. Dr. Wu also is from and Drs. Skipper, Elston, and Forcucci are from the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Drs. Wu and Elston are from the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, and Drs. Skipper and Forcucci are from the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Dirk M. Elston, MD, Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Ave, MSC 578, Charleston, SC 29425 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 103(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
16, 19-20
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Wu is from the Department of Dermatology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China. Dr. Wu also is from and Drs. Skipper, Elston, and Forcucci are from the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Drs. Wu and Elston are from the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, and Drs. Skipper and Forcucci are from the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Dirk M. Elston, MD, Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Ave, MSC 578, Charleston, SC 29425 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Wu is from the Department of Dermatology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China. Dr. Wu also is from and Drs. Skipper, Elston, and Forcucci are from the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Drs. Wu and Elston are from the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, and Drs. Skipper and Forcucci are from the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Dirk M. Elston, MD, Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Ave, MSC 578, Charleston, SC 29425 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

The Diagnosis: Ruptured Molluscum

Molluscum contagiosum (MC) is caused by a DNA virus (MC virus) belonging to the poxvirus family. Molluscum contagiosum is common and predominantly seen in children and young adults. In sexually active adults, the lesions commonly occur in the genital region, abdomen, and inner thighs. In immunocompromised individuals, including those with AIDS, the lesions are more extensive and may cause disfigurement.1 Molluscum contagiosum involving epidermoid cysts has been reported.2

Histopathologically, MC can be classified as noninflammatory or inflammatory. In noninflamed lesions, multiple large, intracytoplasmic, eosinophilic inclusions (Henderson-Paterson bodies) appear within the lobulated endophytic and hyperplastic epidermis. Ultrastructurally, these bodies show membrane-bound collections of MC virus.1 Replicating Henderson-Paterson bodies can result in rupture and inflammation. This case demonstrates a palisading granuloma containing keratin with few Henderson-Paterson bodies (quiz image) due to prior rupture of a molluscum or molluscoid cyst.

Rheumatoid nodules, the most characteristic histopathologic lesions of rheumatoid arthritis, are most commonly found in the subcutis at points of pressure and may occur in connective tissue of numerous organs. Rheumatoid nodules are firm, nontender, and mobile within the subcutaneous tissue but may be fixed to underlying structures including the periosteum, tendons, or bursae.3,4 Occasionally, superficial nodules may perforate the epidermis.5 The inner central necrobiotic zone appears as intensely eosinophilic, amorphous fibrin and other cellular debris. This central area is surrounded by histiocytes in a palisaded configuration (Figure 1). Multinucleated foreign body giant cells also may be present. Occasionally, mast cells, eosinophils, and neutrophils are present.6,7

Figure 1. Rheumatoid nodule histopathology with a central fibrinous area surrounded by histiocytes in a palisaded pattern (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei presents with multiple discrete, smooth, yellow-brown to red, dome-shaped papules. The lesions typically are located on the central and lateral sides of the face and infrequently involve the neck. Other sites including the axillae, arms, hands, legs, and groin occasionally can be involved. Diascopy may reveal an apple jelly color.8,9 The histopathologic hallmark of lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei is an epithelioid cell granuloma with central necrosis (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei histopathology with palisading epithelioid cell granuloma with central necrosis (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is a soft tissue tumor with a known propensity for local recurrence, regional lymph node involvement, sporotrichoid spread, and distant metastases.10 The name was coined by Enzinger11 in 1970 during a review of 62 cases of a “peculiar form of sarcoma that has repeatedly been confused with a chronic inflammatory process, a necrotizing granuloma, and a squamous cell carcinoma.” Epithelioid sarcoma tends to grow slowly in a nodular or multinodular manner along fascial structures and tendons, often with central necrosis and ulceration of the overlying skin. Histopathologically, classic ES shows nodular masses of uniform plump epithelioid cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent central necrosis. A biphasic pattern is typical with spindle cells merging with epithelioid cells. Cellular atypia is relatively mild and mitoses are rare (Figure 3). Recurrent or metastatic lesions can show a greater degree of pleomorphism.12 Given the low-grade atypia in early lesions, this sarcoma is easily misdiagnosed as granulomatous dermatitis. Immunohistochemically, the majority of ES cases are positive for cytokeratins and epithelial membrane antigen; SMARCB1/INI-1 expression is characteristically lost.13

Figure 3. Epithelioid sarcoma histopathology with plump epithelioid and spindled cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent necrosis (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (formerly Wegener granulomatosis) is an autoimmune vasculitis highly associated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Clinical manifestations include systemic necrotizing vasculitis; necrotizing glomerulonephritis; and granulomatous inflammation, which predominantly involves the upper respiratory tract, skin, and mucosa.14,15 Skin involvement may be the initial manifestation of the disease and consists of palpable purpura, papules, ulcerations, vesicles, subcutaneous nodules, necrotizing ulcerations, papulonecrotic lesions, and petechiae. None of the findings are pathognomonic. The cutaneous histopathologic spectrum includes leukocytoclastic vasculitis, extravascular palisading granulomas, and granulomatous vasculitis.16 In the acute lesions of granulomatosis with polyangiitis, the predominant pattern of inflammation is not granulomatous but purulent with the appearance of an abscess. As it evolves, it develops a central zone of necrosis with extensive karyorrhectic debris and palisades of macrophages with scattered multinucleated giant cells (Figure 4).17

Figure 4. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis histopathology with necrosis and palisades of macrophages with scattered multinucleated giant cells with a central neutrophilic infiltrate (H&E, original magnification ×100).

 

 

 

The Diagnosis: Ruptured Molluscum

Molluscum contagiosum (MC) is caused by a DNA virus (MC virus) belonging to the poxvirus family. Molluscum contagiosum is common and predominantly seen in children and young adults. In sexually active adults, the lesions commonly occur in the genital region, abdomen, and inner thighs. In immunocompromised individuals, including those with AIDS, the lesions are more extensive and may cause disfigurement.1 Molluscum contagiosum involving epidermoid cysts has been reported.2

Histopathologically, MC can be classified as noninflammatory or inflammatory. In noninflamed lesions, multiple large, intracytoplasmic, eosinophilic inclusions (Henderson-Paterson bodies) appear within the lobulated endophytic and hyperplastic epidermis. Ultrastructurally, these bodies show membrane-bound collections of MC virus.1 Replicating Henderson-Paterson bodies can result in rupture and inflammation. This case demonstrates a palisading granuloma containing keratin with few Henderson-Paterson bodies (quiz image) due to prior rupture of a molluscum or molluscoid cyst.

Rheumatoid nodules, the most characteristic histopathologic lesions of rheumatoid arthritis, are most commonly found in the subcutis at points of pressure and may occur in connective tissue of numerous organs. Rheumatoid nodules are firm, nontender, and mobile within the subcutaneous tissue but may be fixed to underlying structures including the periosteum, tendons, or bursae.3,4 Occasionally, superficial nodules may perforate the epidermis.5 The inner central necrobiotic zone appears as intensely eosinophilic, amorphous fibrin and other cellular debris. This central area is surrounded by histiocytes in a palisaded configuration (Figure 1). Multinucleated foreign body giant cells also may be present. Occasionally, mast cells, eosinophils, and neutrophils are present.6,7

Figure 1. Rheumatoid nodule histopathology with a central fibrinous area surrounded by histiocytes in a palisaded pattern (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei presents with multiple discrete, smooth, yellow-brown to red, dome-shaped papules. The lesions typically are located on the central and lateral sides of the face and infrequently involve the neck. Other sites including the axillae, arms, hands, legs, and groin occasionally can be involved. Diascopy may reveal an apple jelly color.8,9 The histopathologic hallmark of lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei is an epithelioid cell granuloma with central necrosis (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei histopathology with palisading epithelioid cell granuloma with central necrosis (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is a soft tissue tumor with a known propensity for local recurrence, regional lymph node involvement, sporotrichoid spread, and distant metastases.10 The name was coined by Enzinger11 in 1970 during a review of 62 cases of a “peculiar form of sarcoma that has repeatedly been confused with a chronic inflammatory process, a necrotizing granuloma, and a squamous cell carcinoma.” Epithelioid sarcoma tends to grow slowly in a nodular or multinodular manner along fascial structures and tendons, often with central necrosis and ulceration of the overlying skin. Histopathologically, classic ES shows nodular masses of uniform plump epithelioid cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent central necrosis. A biphasic pattern is typical with spindle cells merging with epithelioid cells. Cellular atypia is relatively mild and mitoses are rare (Figure 3). Recurrent or metastatic lesions can show a greater degree of pleomorphism.12 Given the low-grade atypia in early lesions, this sarcoma is easily misdiagnosed as granulomatous dermatitis. Immunohistochemically, the majority of ES cases are positive for cytokeratins and epithelial membrane antigen; SMARCB1/INI-1 expression is characteristically lost.13

Figure 3. Epithelioid sarcoma histopathology with plump epithelioid and spindled cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent necrosis (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (formerly Wegener granulomatosis) is an autoimmune vasculitis highly associated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Clinical manifestations include systemic necrotizing vasculitis; necrotizing glomerulonephritis; and granulomatous inflammation, which predominantly involves the upper respiratory tract, skin, and mucosa.14,15 Skin involvement may be the initial manifestation of the disease and consists of palpable purpura, papules, ulcerations, vesicles, subcutaneous nodules, necrotizing ulcerations, papulonecrotic lesions, and petechiae. None of the findings are pathognomonic. The cutaneous histopathologic spectrum includes leukocytoclastic vasculitis, extravascular palisading granulomas, and granulomatous vasculitis.16 In the acute lesions of granulomatosis with polyangiitis, the predominant pattern of inflammation is not granulomatous but purulent with the appearance of an abscess. As it evolves, it develops a central zone of necrosis with extensive karyorrhectic debris and palisades of macrophages with scattered multinucleated giant cells (Figure 4).17

Figure 4. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis histopathology with necrosis and palisades of macrophages with scattered multinucleated giant cells with a central neutrophilic infiltrate (H&E, original magnification ×100).

 

 

 

References

1. Nandhini G, Rajkumar K, Kanth KS, et al. Molluscum contagiosum in a 12-year-old child—report of a case and review of literature. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7:63-66.

2. Phelps A, Murphy M, Elaba Z, et al. Molluscum contagiosum virus infection in benign cutaneous epithelial cystic lesions-report of 2 cases with different pathogenesis? Am J Dermatopathol. 2010;32:740-742.

3. Sayah A, English JC 3rd. Rheumatoid arthritis: a review of the cutaneous manifestations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53:191-209; quiz 210-192.

4. Sibbitt WL Jr, Williams RC Jr. Cutaneous manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Dermatol. 1982;21:563-572.

5. Barzilai A, Huszar M, Shpiro D, et al. Pseudorheumatoid nodules in adults: a juxta-articular form of nodular granuloma annulare. Am J Dermatopathol. 2005;27:1-5.

6. Garcia-Patos V. Rheumatoid nodule. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2007;26:100-107.

7. Patterson JW. Rheumatoid nodule and subcutaneous granuloma annulare. a comparative histologic study. Am J Dermatopathol. 1988;10:1-8.

8. Sehgal VN, Srivastava G, Aggarwal AK, et al. Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei part II: an overview. Skinmed. 2005;4:234-238.

9. Cymerman R, Rosenstein R, Shvartsbeyn M, et al. Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei. Dermatol Online J. 2015;21. pii:13030/qt6b83q5gp.

10. Sobanko JF, Meijer L, Nigra TP. Epithelioid sarcoma: a review and update. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2009;2:49-54.

11. Enzinger FM. Epitheloid sarcoma. a sarcoma simulating a granuloma or a carcinoma. Cancer. 1970;26:1029-1041.

12. Fisher C. Epithelioid sarcoma of Enzinger. Adv Anat Pathol. 2006;13:114-121.

13. Miettinen M, Fanburg-Smith JC, Virolainen M, et al. Epithelioid sarcoma: an immunohistochemical analysis of 112 classical and variant cases and a discussion of the differential diagnosis. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:934-942.

14. Lutalo PM, D’Cruz DP. Diagnosis and classification of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (aka Wegener’s granulomatosis)[published online January 29, 2014]. J Autoimmun. 2014;48-49:94-98.

15. Frances C, Du LT, Piette JC, et al. Wegener’s granulomatosis. dermatological manifestations in 75 cases with clinicopathologic correlation. Arch Dermatol. 1994;130:861-867.

16. Daoud MS, Gibson LE, DeRemee RA, et al. Cutaneous Wegener’s granulomatosis: clinical, histopathologic, and immunopathologic features of thirty patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;31:605-612.

17. Jennette JC. Nomenclature and classification of vasculitis: lessons learned from granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s granulomatosis). Clin Exp Immunol. 2011;164 (suppl 1):7-10.

References

1. Nandhini G, Rajkumar K, Kanth KS, et al. Molluscum contagiosum in a 12-year-old child—report of a case and review of literature. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7:63-66.

2. Phelps A, Murphy M, Elaba Z, et al. Molluscum contagiosum virus infection in benign cutaneous epithelial cystic lesions-report of 2 cases with different pathogenesis? Am J Dermatopathol. 2010;32:740-742.

3. Sayah A, English JC 3rd. Rheumatoid arthritis: a review of the cutaneous manifestations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53:191-209; quiz 210-192.

4. Sibbitt WL Jr, Williams RC Jr. Cutaneous manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Dermatol. 1982;21:563-572.

5. Barzilai A, Huszar M, Shpiro D, et al. Pseudorheumatoid nodules in adults: a juxta-articular form of nodular granuloma annulare. Am J Dermatopathol. 2005;27:1-5.

6. Garcia-Patos V. Rheumatoid nodule. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2007;26:100-107.

7. Patterson JW. Rheumatoid nodule and subcutaneous granuloma annulare. a comparative histologic study. Am J Dermatopathol. 1988;10:1-8.

8. Sehgal VN, Srivastava G, Aggarwal AK, et al. Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei part II: an overview. Skinmed. 2005;4:234-238.

9. Cymerman R, Rosenstein R, Shvartsbeyn M, et al. Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei. Dermatol Online J. 2015;21. pii:13030/qt6b83q5gp.

10. Sobanko JF, Meijer L, Nigra TP. Epithelioid sarcoma: a review and update. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2009;2:49-54.

11. Enzinger FM. Epitheloid sarcoma. a sarcoma simulating a granuloma or a carcinoma. Cancer. 1970;26:1029-1041.

12. Fisher C. Epithelioid sarcoma of Enzinger. Adv Anat Pathol. 2006;13:114-121.

13. Miettinen M, Fanburg-Smith JC, Virolainen M, et al. Epithelioid sarcoma: an immunohistochemical analysis of 112 classical and variant cases and a discussion of the differential diagnosis. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:934-942.

14. Lutalo PM, D’Cruz DP. Diagnosis and classification of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (aka Wegener’s granulomatosis)[published online January 29, 2014]. J Autoimmun. 2014;48-49:94-98.

15. Frances C, Du LT, Piette JC, et al. Wegener’s granulomatosis. dermatological manifestations in 75 cases with clinicopathologic correlation. Arch Dermatol. 1994;130:861-867.

16. Daoud MS, Gibson LE, DeRemee RA, et al. Cutaneous Wegener’s granulomatosis: clinical, histopathologic, and immunopathologic features of thirty patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;31:605-612.

17. Jennette JC. Nomenclature and classification of vasculitis: lessons learned from granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s granulomatosis). Clin Exp Immunol. 2011;164 (suppl 1):7-10.

Issue
Cutis - 103(1)
Issue
Cutis - 103(1)
Page Number
16, 19-20
Page Number
16, 19-20
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Solitary Nodule on the Thigh
Display Headline
Solitary Nodule on the Thigh
Sections
Questionnaire Body

H&E, original magnification ×40 (inset, original magnification ×100).

A 17-year-old adolescent girl presented with a discrete nodule on the thigh.  

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Article PDF Media

Perianal Condyloma Acuminatum-like Plaque

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 01/10/2019 - 13:49
Display Headline
Perianal Condyloma Acuminatum-like Plaque

The Diagnosis: Metastatic Crohn Disease

Crohn disease (CD), a chronic inflammatory granulomatous disease of the gastrointestinal tract, has a wide spectrum of presentations.1 The condition may affect the vulva, perineum, or perianal skin by direct extension from the gastrointestinal tract or may appear as a separate and distinct cutaneous focus of disease referred to as metastatic Crohn disease (MCD).2

Cutaneous lesions of MCD include ulcers, fissures, sinus tracts, abscesses, and vegetative plaques, which typically extend in continuity with sites of intra-abdominal disease to the perineum, buttocks, or abdominal wall, as well as ostomy sites or incisional scars. Erythema nodosum and pyoderma gangrenosum are the most common nonspecific cutaneous manifestations. Other cutaneous lesions described in CD include polyarteritis nodosa, psoriasis, erythema multiforme, erythema elevatum diutinum, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, acne fulminans, pyoderma faciale, neutrophilic lobular panniculitis, granulomatous vasculitis, and porokeratosis.3

Perianal skin is the most common site of cutaneous involvement in individuals with CD. It is a marker of more severe disease and is associated with multiple surgical interventions and frequent relapses and has been reported in 22% of patients with CD.4 Most already had an existing diagnosis of gastrointestinal CD, which was active in one-third of individuals; however, 20% presented with disease at nongastrointestinal sites 2 months to 4 years prior to developing the gastrointestinal CD manifestations.5 Our patient presented with lesions on the perianal skin of 2 years' duration and a 6-month history of diarrhea. A colonoscopy demonstrated shallow ulcers involving the ileocecal portion of the gut, colon, and rectum. A biopsy from intestinal mucosal tissue showed acute and chronic inflammation with necrosis mixed with granulomatous inflammation, suggestive of CD.

Microscopically, the dominant histologic features of MCD are similar to those of bowel lesions, including an inflammatory infiltrate commonly consisting of sterile noncaseating sarcoidal granulomas, foreign body and Langhans giant cells, epithelioid histiocytes, and plasma cells surrounded by numerous mononuclear cells within the dermis with occasional extension into the subcutis (quiz image). Less common features include collagen degeneration, an infiltrate rich in eosinophils, dermal edema, and mixed lichenoid and granulomatous dermatitis.6

Metastatic CD often is misdiagnosed. A detailed history and physical examination may help narrow the differential; however, biopsy is necessary to establish a diagnosis of MCD. The histologic differential diagnosis of sarcoidal granulomatous inflammation of genital skin includes sarcoidosis, rheumatoid arthritis, leprosy or other mycobacterial and parasitic infection, granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), and granulomatous infiltrate associated with certain exogenous material (eg, silica, zirconium, beryllium, tattoo pigment).

Sarcoidosis is a multiorgan disease that most frequently affects the lungs, skin, and lymph nodes. Its etiopathogenesis has not been clearly elucidated.7 Cutaneous lesions are present in 20% to 35% of patients.8 Given the wide variability of clinical manifestations, cutaneous sarcoidosis is another one of the great imitators. Cutaneous lesions are classified as specific and nonspecific depending on the presence of noncaseating granulomas on histologic studies and include maculopapules, plaques, nodules, lupus pernio, scar infiltration, alopecia, ulcerative lesions, and hypopigmentation. The most common nonspecific lesion of cutaneous sarcoidosis is erythema nodosum. Other manifestations include calcifications, prurigo, erythema multiforme, nail clubbing, and Sweet syndrome.9

Histologic findings in sarcoidosis generally are independent of the respective organ and clinical disease presentation. The epidermis usually remains unchanged, whereas the dermis shows a superficial and deep nodular granulomatous infiltrate. Granulomas consist of epithelioid cells with only few giant cells and no surrounding lymphocytes or a very sparse lymphocytic infiltrate ("naked" granuloma)(Figure 1). Foreign bodies, including silica, are known to be able to induce sarcoid granulomas, especially in patients with sarcoidosis. A sarcoidal reaction in long-standing scar tissue points to a diagnosis of sarcoidosis.10

Figure 1. Cutaneous sarcoidosis. Granulomas with a sparse lymphocytic infiltrate (“naked” granuloma)(H&E, original magnification ×100).

Cutaneous tuberculosis primarily is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and less frequently Mycobacterium bovis.11,12 The manifestations of cutaneous tuberculosis depends on various factors such as the type of infection, mode of dissemination, host immunity, and whether it is a first-time infection or a recurrence. In Europe, the head and neck regions are most frequently affected.13 Lesions present as red-brown papules coalescing into a plaque. The tissue, especially in central parts of the lesion, is fragile (probe phenomenon). Diascopy shows the typical apple jelly-like color.

Histologically, cutaneous tuberculosis is characterized by typical tuberculoid granulomas with epithelioid cells and Langhans giant cells at the center surrounded by lymphocytes (Figure 2). Caseous necrosis as well as fibrosis may occur,14,15 and the granulomas tend to coalesce.

Figure 2. Cutaneous tuberculosis. Tuberculoid granuloma with epithelioid cells surrounded by many lymphocytes with central caseous necrosis (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis, formerly known as Wegener granulomatosis, is a complex, multisystemic disease with varying manifestations. The condition has been defined as a necrotizing granulomatous inflammation usually involving the upper and lower respiratory tracts and necrotizing vasculitis affecting predominantly small- to medium-sized vessels.16 The etiology of GPA is thought to be linked to environmental and infectious triggers inciting onset of disease in genetically predisposed individuals. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies play an important role in the pathogenesis of this disease. Cutaneous vasculitis secondary to GPA can present as papules, nodules, palpable purpura, ulcers resembling pyoderma gangrenosum, or necrotizing lesions leading to gangrene.17

The predominant histopathologic pattern in cutaneous lesions of GPA is leukocytoclastic vasculitis, which is present in up to 50% of biopsies.18 Characteristic findings that aid in establishing the diagnosis include histologic evidence of focal necrosis, fibrinoid degeneration, palisading granuloma surrounding neutrophils (Figure 3), and granulomatous vasculitis involving muscular vessel walls.19 Nonpalisading foci of necrosis or fibrinoid degeneration may precede the development of the typical palisading granuloma.20

Figure 3. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Palisaded granulomas with a central stellate collection of neutrophils. Multinucleate giant cells are present in the granulomas (H&E, original magnification ×100).

The typical histopathologic pattern of cutaneous amebiasis is ulceration with vascular necrosis (Figure 4).21 The organisms have prominent round nuclei and nucleoli and the cytoplasm may have a scalloped border.

Figure 4. Cutaneous amebiasis. Vascular necrosis with visible trophozoites (arrow)(H&E, original magnification ×400).

References
  1. Crohn BB, Ginzburg L, Oppenheimer GD. Landmark article Oct 25, 1932. regional ileitis. a pathologic and clinical entity. by Burril B. Crohn, Leon Gonzburg and Gordon D. Oppenheimer. JAMA. 1984;251:73-79.
  2. Parks AG, Morson BC, Pegum JS. Crohn's disease with cutaneous involvement. Proc R Soc Med. 1965;58:241-242.
  3. Weedon D. Miscellaneous conditions. Skin Pathology. 2nd ed. London, England: Churchill Livingstone; 2002:554.
  4. Samitz MH, Dana Jr AS, Rosenberg P. Cutaneous vasculitis in association with Crohn's disease. Cutis. 1970;6:51-56.
  5. Palamaras I, El-Jabbour J, Pietropaolo N, et al. Metastatic Crohn's disease: a review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22:1033-1043.
  6. Aberumand B, Howard J, Howard J. Metastatic Crohn's disease: an approach to an uncommon but important cutaneous disorder: a review [published online January 3, 2017]. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:8192150.
  7. Mahony J, Helms SE, Brodell RT. The sarcoidal granuloma: a unifying hypothesis for an enigmatic response. Clin Dermatol. 2014;32:654-659.
  8. Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolf K, et al. Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2003.
  9. Fernandez-Faith E, McDonnell J. Cutaneous sarcoidosis: differential diagnosis. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25:276-287.
  10. Walsh NM, Hanly JG, Tremaine R, et al. Cutaneous sarcoidosis and foreign bodies. Am J Dermatopathol. 1993;15:203-207.
  11. Semaan R, Traboulsi R, Kanj S. Primary Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex cutaneous infection: report of two cases and literature review. Int J Infect Dis. 2008;12:472-477.
  12. Lai-Cheong JE, Perez A, Tang V, et al. Cutaneous manifestations of tuberculosis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007;32:461-466.
  13. Marcoval J, Servitje O, Moreno A, et al. Lupus vulgaris. clinical, histopathologic, and bacteriologic study of 10 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26:404-407.
  14. Tronnier M, Wolff H. Dermatosen mit granulomatöser Entzündung. Histopathologie der Haut. In: Kerl H, Garbe C, Cerroni L, et al, eds. New York, NY: Springer; 2003.
  15. Min KW, Ko JY, Park CK. Histopathological spectrum of cutaneous tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections. J Cutan Pathol. 2012;39:582-595.
  16. Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Bacon PA, et al. 2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference nomenclature of vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:1-11.
  17. Comfere NI, Macaron NC, Gibson LE. Cutaneous manifestations of Wegener's granulomatosis: a clinicopathologic study of 17 patients and correlation to antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody status. J Cutan Pathol. 2007;34:739-747.
  18. Marzano AV, Vezzoli P, Berti E. Skin involvement in cutaneous and systemic vasculitis. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;12:467-476.
  19. Bramsiepe I, Danz B, Heine R, et al. Primary cutaneous manifestation of Wegener's granulomatosis [in German]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008;27:1429-1432.
  20. Daoud MS, Gibson LE, DeRemee RA, et al. Cutaneous Wegener's granulomatosis: clinical, histopathologic, and immunopathologic features of thirty patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;31:605-612.
  21. Guidry JA, Downing C, Tyring SK. Deep fungal infections, blastomycosis-like pyoderma, and granulomatous sexually transmitted infections. Dermatol Clin. 2015;33:595-607.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Dr. Luo also is from the Department of Dermatology, Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Command, Hubei, China.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Dirk M. Elston, MD, Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Ave, MSC 578, Charleston, SC 29425 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 101(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
248, 255-256, 259
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Dr. Luo also is from the Department of Dermatology, Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Command, Hubei, China.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Dirk M. Elston, MD, Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Ave, MSC 578, Charleston, SC 29425 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Dr. Luo also is from the Department of Dermatology, Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Command, Hubei, China.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Dirk M. Elston, MD, Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Ave, MSC 578, Charleston, SC 29425 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

The Diagnosis: Metastatic Crohn Disease

Crohn disease (CD), a chronic inflammatory granulomatous disease of the gastrointestinal tract, has a wide spectrum of presentations.1 The condition may affect the vulva, perineum, or perianal skin by direct extension from the gastrointestinal tract or may appear as a separate and distinct cutaneous focus of disease referred to as metastatic Crohn disease (MCD).2

Cutaneous lesions of MCD include ulcers, fissures, sinus tracts, abscesses, and vegetative plaques, which typically extend in continuity with sites of intra-abdominal disease to the perineum, buttocks, or abdominal wall, as well as ostomy sites or incisional scars. Erythema nodosum and pyoderma gangrenosum are the most common nonspecific cutaneous manifestations. Other cutaneous lesions described in CD include polyarteritis nodosa, psoriasis, erythema multiforme, erythema elevatum diutinum, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, acne fulminans, pyoderma faciale, neutrophilic lobular panniculitis, granulomatous vasculitis, and porokeratosis.3

Perianal skin is the most common site of cutaneous involvement in individuals with CD. It is a marker of more severe disease and is associated with multiple surgical interventions and frequent relapses and has been reported in 22% of patients with CD.4 Most already had an existing diagnosis of gastrointestinal CD, which was active in one-third of individuals; however, 20% presented with disease at nongastrointestinal sites 2 months to 4 years prior to developing the gastrointestinal CD manifestations.5 Our patient presented with lesions on the perianal skin of 2 years' duration and a 6-month history of diarrhea. A colonoscopy demonstrated shallow ulcers involving the ileocecal portion of the gut, colon, and rectum. A biopsy from intestinal mucosal tissue showed acute and chronic inflammation with necrosis mixed with granulomatous inflammation, suggestive of CD.

Microscopically, the dominant histologic features of MCD are similar to those of bowel lesions, including an inflammatory infiltrate commonly consisting of sterile noncaseating sarcoidal granulomas, foreign body and Langhans giant cells, epithelioid histiocytes, and plasma cells surrounded by numerous mononuclear cells within the dermis with occasional extension into the subcutis (quiz image). Less common features include collagen degeneration, an infiltrate rich in eosinophils, dermal edema, and mixed lichenoid and granulomatous dermatitis.6

Metastatic CD often is misdiagnosed. A detailed history and physical examination may help narrow the differential; however, biopsy is necessary to establish a diagnosis of MCD. The histologic differential diagnosis of sarcoidal granulomatous inflammation of genital skin includes sarcoidosis, rheumatoid arthritis, leprosy or other mycobacterial and parasitic infection, granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), and granulomatous infiltrate associated with certain exogenous material (eg, silica, zirconium, beryllium, tattoo pigment).

Sarcoidosis is a multiorgan disease that most frequently affects the lungs, skin, and lymph nodes. Its etiopathogenesis has not been clearly elucidated.7 Cutaneous lesions are present in 20% to 35% of patients.8 Given the wide variability of clinical manifestations, cutaneous sarcoidosis is another one of the great imitators. Cutaneous lesions are classified as specific and nonspecific depending on the presence of noncaseating granulomas on histologic studies and include maculopapules, plaques, nodules, lupus pernio, scar infiltration, alopecia, ulcerative lesions, and hypopigmentation. The most common nonspecific lesion of cutaneous sarcoidosis is erythema nodosum. Other manifestations include calcifications, prurigo, erythema multiforme, nail clubbing, and Sweet syndrome.9

Histologic findings in sarcoidosis generally are independent of the respective organ and clinical disease presentation. The epidermis usually remains unchanged, whereas the dermis shows a superficial and deep nodular granulomatous infiltrate. Granulomas consist of epithelioid cells with only few giant cells and no surrounding lymphocytes or a very sparse lymphocytic infiltrate ("naked" granuloma)(Figure 1). Foreign bodies, including silica, are known to be able to induce sarcoid granulomas, especially in patients with sarcoidosis. A sarcoidal reaction in long-standing scar tissue points to a diagnosis of sarcoidosis.10

Figure 1. Cutaneous sarcoidosis. Granulomas with a sparse lymphocytic infiltrate (“naked” granuloma)(H&E, original magnification ×100).

Cutaneous tuberculosis primarily is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and less frequently Mycobacterium bovis.11,12 The manifestations of cutaneous tuberculosis depends on various factors such as the type of infection, mode of dissemination, host immunity, and whether it is a first-time infection or a recurrence. In Europe, the head and neck regions are most frequently affected.13 Lesions present as red-brown papules coalescing into a plaque. The tissue, especially in central parts of the lesion, is fragile (probe phenomenon). Diascopy shows the typical apple jelly-like color.

Histologically, cutaneous tuberculosis is characterized by typical tuberculoid granulomas with epithelioid cells and Langhans giant cells at the center surrounded by lymphocytes (Figure 2). Caseous necrosis as well as fibrosis may occur,14,15 and the granulomas tend to coalesce.

Figure 2. Cutaneous tuberculosis. Tuberculoid granuloma with epithelioid cells surrounded by many lymphocytes with central caseous necrosis (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis, formerly known as Wegener granulomatosis, is a complex, multisystemic disease with varying manifestations. The condition has been defined as a necrotizing granulomatous inflammation usually involving the upper and lower respiratory tracts and necrotizing vasculitis affecting predominantly small- to medium-sized vessels.16 The etiology of GPA is thought to be linked to environmental and infectious triggers inciting onset of disease in genetically predisposed individuals. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies play an important role in the pathogenesis of this disease. Cutaneous vasculitis secondary to GPA can present as papules, nodules, palpable purpura, ulcers resembling pyoderma gangrenosum, or necrotizing lesions leading to gangrene.17

The predominant histopathologic pattern in cutaneous lesions of GPA is leukocytoclastic vasculitis, which is present in up to 50% of biopsies.18 Characteristic findings that aid in establishing the diagnosis include histologic evidence of focal necrosis, fibrinoid degeneration, palisading granuloma surrounding neutrophils (Figure 3), and granulomatous vasculitis involving muscular vessel walls.19 Nonpalisading foci of necrosis or fibrinoid degeneration may precede the development of the typical palisading granuloma.20

Figure 3. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Palisaded granulomas with a central stellate collection of neutrophils. Multinucleate giant cells are present in the granulomas (H&E, original magnification ×100).

The typical histopathologic pattern of cutaneous amebiasis is ulceration with vascular necrosis (Figure 4).21 The organisms have prominent round nuclei and nucleoli and the cytoplasm may have a scalloped border.

Figure 4. Cutaneous amebiasis. Vascular necrosis with visible trophozoites (arrow)(H&E, original magnification ×400).

The Diagnosis: Metastatic Crohn Disease

Crohn disease (CD), a chronic inflammatory granulomatous disease of the gastrointestinal tract, has a wide spectrum of presentations.1 The condition may affect the vulva, perineum, or perianal skin by direct extension from the gastrointestinal tract or may appear as a separate and distinct cutaneous focus of disease referred to as metastatic Crohn disease (MCD).2

Cutaneous lesions of MCD include ulcers, fissures, sinus tracts, abscesses, and vegetative plaques, which typically extend in continuity with sites of intra-abdominal disease to the perineum, buttocks, or abdominal wall, as well as ostomy sites or incisional scars. Erythema nodosum and pyoderma gangrenosum are the most common nonspecific cutaneous manifestations. Other cutaneous lesions described in CD include polyarteritis nodosa, psoriasis, erythema multiforme, erythema elevatum diutinum, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, acne fulminans, pyoderma faciale, neutrophilic lobular panniculitis, granulomatous vasculitis, and porokeratosis.3

Perianal skin is the most common site of cutaneous involvement in individuals with CD. It is a marker of more severe disease and is associated with multiple surgical interventions and frequent relapses and has been reported in 22% of patients with CD.4 Most already had an existing diagnosis of gastrointestinal CD, which was active in one-third of individuals; however, 20% presented with disease at nongastrointestinal sites 2 months to 4 years prior to developing the gastrointestinal CD manifestations.5 Our patient presented with lesions on the perianal skin of 2 years' duration and a 6-month history of diarrhea. A colonoscopy demonstrated shallow ulcers involving the ileocecal portion of the gut, colon, and rectum. A biopsy from intestinal mucosal tissue showed acute and chronic inflammation with necrosis mixed with granulomatous inflammation, suggestive of CD.

Microscopically, the dominant histologic features of MCD are similar to those of bowel lesions, including an inflammatory infiltrate commonly consisting of sterile noncaseating sarcoidal granulomas, foreign body and Langhans giant cells, epithelioid histiocytes, and plasma cells surrounded by numerous mononuclear cells within the dermis with occasional extension into the subcutis (quiz image). Less common features include collagen degeneration, an infiltrate rich in eosinophils, dermal edema, and mixed lichenoid and granulomatous dermatitis.6

Metastatic CD often is misdiagnosed. A detailed history and physical examination may help narrow the differential; however, biopsy is necessary to establish a diagnosis of MCD. The histologic differential diagnosis of sarcoidal granulomatous inflammation of genital skin includes sarcoidosis, rheumatoid arthritis, leprosy or other mycobacterial and parasitic infection, granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), and granulomatous infiltrate associated with certain exogenous material (eg, silica, zirconium, beryllium, tattoo pigment).

Sarcoidosis is a multiorgan disease that most frequently affects the lungs, skin, and lymph nodes. Its etiopathogenesis has not been clearly elucidated.7 Cutaneous lesions are present in 20% to 35% of patients.8 Given the wide variability of clinical manifestations, cutaneous sarcoidosis is another one of the great imitators. Cutaneous lesions are classified as specific and nonspecific depending on the presence of noncaseating granulomas on histologic studies and include maculopapules, plaques, nodules, lupus pernio, scar infiltration, alopecia, ulcerative lesions, and hypopigmentation. The most common nonspecific lesion of cutaneous sarcoidosis is erythema nodosum. Other manifestations include calcifications, prurigo, erythema multiforme, nail clubbing, and Sweet syndrome.9

Histologic findings in sarcoidosis generally are independent of the respective organ and clinical disease presentation. The epidermis usually remains unchanged, whereas the dermis shows a superficial and deep nodular granulomatous infiltrate. Granulomas consist of epithelioid cells with only few giant cells and no surrounding lymphocytes or a very sparse lymphocytic infiltrate ("naked" granuloma)(Figure 1). Foreign bodies, including silica, are known to be able to induce sarcoid granulomas, especially in patients with sarcoidosis. A sarcoidal reaction in long-standing scar tissue points to a diagnosis of sarcoidosis.10

Figure 1. Cutaneous sarcoidosis. Granulomas with a sparse lymphocytic infiltrate (“naked” granuloma)(H&E, original magnification ×100).

Cutaneous tuberculosis primarily is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and less frequently Mycobacterium bovis.11,12 The manifestations of cutaneous tuberculosis depends on various factors such as the type of infection, mode of dissemination, host immunity, and whether it is a first-time infection or a recurrence. In Europe, the head and neck regions are most frequently affected.13 Lesions present as red-brown papules coalescing into a plaque. The tissue, especially in central parts of the lesion, is fragile (probe phenomenon). Diascopy shows the typical apple jelly-like color.

Histologically, cutaneous tuberculosis is characterized by typical tuberculoid granulomas with epithelioid cells and Langhans giant cells at the center surrounded by lymphocytes (Figure 2). Caseous necrosis as well as fibrosis may occur,14,15 and the granulomas tend to coalesce.

Figure 2. Cutaneous tuberculosis. Tuberculoid granuloma with epithelioid cells surrounded by many lymphocytes with central caseous necrosis (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis, formerly known as Wegener granulomatosis, is a complex, multisystemic disease with varying manifestations. The condition has been defined as a necrotizing granulomatous inflammation usually involving the upper and lower respiratory tracts and necrotizing vasculitis affecting predominantly small- to medium-sized vessels.16 The etiology of GPA is thought to be linked to environmental and infectious triggers inciting onset of disease in genetically predisposed individuals. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies play an important role in the pathogenesis of this disease. Cutaneous vasculitis secondary to GPA can present as papules, nodules, palpable purpura, ulcers resembling pyoderma gangrenosum, or necrotizing lesions leading to gangrene.17

The predominant histopathologic pattern in cutaneous lesions of GPA is leukocytoclastic vasculitis, which is present in up to 50% of biopsies.18 Characteristic findings that aid in establishing the diagnosis include histologic evidence of focal necrosis, fibrinoid degeneration, palisading granuloma surrounding neutrophils (Figure 3), and granulomatous vasculitis involving muscular vessel walls.19 Nonpalisading foci of necrosis or fibrinoid degeneration may precede the development of the typical palisading granuloma.20

Figure 3. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Palisaded granulomas with a central stellate collection of neutrophils. Multinucleate giant cells are present in the granulomas (H&E, original magnification ×100).

The typical histopathologic pattern of cutaneous amebiasis is ulceration with vascular necrosis (Figure 4).21 The organisms have prominent round nuclei and nucleoli and the cytoplasm may have a scalloped border.

Figure 4. Cutaneous amebiasis. Vascular necrosis with visible trophozoites (arrow)(H&E, original magnification ×400).

References
  1. Crohn BB, Ginzburg L, Oppenheimer GD. Landmark article Oct 25, 1932. regional ileitis. a pathologic and clinical entity. by Burril B. Crohn, Leon Gonzburg and Gordon D. Oppenheimer. JAMA. 1984;251:73-79.
  2. Parks AG, Morson BC, Pegum JS. Crohn's disease with cutaneous involvement. Proc R Soc Med. 1965;58:241-242.
  3. Weedon D. Miscellaneous conditions. Skin Pathology. 2nd ed. London, England: Churchill Livingstone; 2002:554.
  4. Samitz MH, Dana Jr AS, Rosenberg P. Cutaneous vasculitis in association with Crohn's disease. Cutis. 1970;6:51-56.
  5. Palamaras I, El-Jabbour J, Pietropaolo N, et al. Metastatic Crohn's disease: a review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22:1033-1043.
  6. Aberumand B, Howard J, Howard J. Metastatic Crohn's disease: an approach to an uncommon but important cutaneous disorder: a review [published online January 3, 2017]. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:8192150.
  7. Mahony J, Helms SE, Brodell RT. The sarcoidal granuloma: a unifying hypothesis for an enigmatic response. Clin Dermatol. 2014;32:654-659.
  8. Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolf K, et al. Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2003.
  9. Fernandez-Faith E, McDonnell J. Cutaneous sarcoidosis: differential diagnosis. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25:276-287.
  10. Walsh NM, Hanly JG, Tremaine R, et al. Cutaneous sarcoidosis and foreign bodies. Am J Dermatopathol. 1993;15:203-207.
  11. Semaan R, Traboulsi R, Kanj S. Primary Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex cutaneous infection: report of two cases and literature review. Int J Infect Dis. 2008;12:472-477.
  12. Lai-Cheong JE, Perez A, Tang V, et al. Cutaneous manifestations of tuberculosis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007;32:461-466.
  13. Marcoval J, Servitje O, Moreno A, et al. Lupus vulgaris. clinical, histopathologic, and bacteriologic study of 10 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26:404-407.
  14. Tronnier M, Wolff H. Dermatosen mit granulomatöser Entzündung. Histopathologie der Haut. In: Kerl H, Garbe C, Cerroni L, et al, eds. New York, NY: Springer; 2003.
  15. Min KW, Ko JY, Park CK. Histopathological spectrum of cutaneous tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections. J Cutan Pathol. 2012;39:582-595.
  16. Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Bacon PA, et al. 2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference nomenclature of vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:1-11.
  17. Comfere NI, Macaron NC, Gibson LE. Cutaneous manifestations of Wegener's granulomatosis: a clinicopathologic study of 17 patients and correlation to antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody status. J Cutan Pathol. 2007;34:739-747.
  18. Marzano AV, Vezzoli P, Berti E. Skin involvement in cutaneous and systemic vasculitis. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;12:467-476.
  19. Bramsiepe I, Danz B, Heine R, et al. Primary cutaneous manifestation of Wegener's granulomatosis [in German]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008;27:1429-1432.
  20. Daoud MS, Gibson LE, DeRemee RA, et al. Cutaneous Wegener's granulomatosis: clinical, histopathologic, and immunopathologic features of thirty patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;31:605-612.
  21. Guidry JA, Downing C, Tyring SK. Deep fungal infections, blastomycosis-like pyoderma, and granulomatous sexually transmitted infections. Dermatol Clin. 2015;33:595-607.
References
  1. Crohn BB, Ginzburg L, Oppenheimer GD. Landmark article Oct 25, 1932. regional ileitis. a pathologic and clinical entity. by Burril B. Crohn, Leon Gonzburg and Gordon D. Oppenheimer. JAMA. 1984;251:73-79.
  2. Parks AG, Morson BC, Pegum JS. Crohn's disease with cutaneous involvement. Proc R Soc Med. 1965;58:241-242.
  3. Weedon D. Miscellaneous conditions. Skin Pathology. 2nd ed. London, England: Churchill Livingstone; 2002:554.
  4. Samitz MH, Dana Jr AS, Rosenberg P. Cutaneous vasculitis in association with Crohn's disease. Cutis. 1970;6:51-56.
  5. Palamaras I, El-Jabbour J, Pietropaolo N, et al. Metastatic Crohn's disease: a review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22:1033-1043.
  6. Aberumand B, Howard J, Howard J. Metastatic Crohn's disease: an approach to an uncommon but important cutaneous disorder: a review [published online January 3, 2017]. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:8192150.
  7. Mahony J, Helms SE, Brodell RT. The sarcoidal granuloma: a unifying hypothesis for an enigmatic response. Clin Dermatol. 2014;32:654-659.
  8. Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolf K, et al. Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2003.
  9. Fernandez-Faith E, McDonnell J. Cutaneous sarcoidosis: differential diagnosis. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25:276-287.
  10. Walsh NM, Hanly JG, Tremaine R, et al. Cutaneous sarcoidosis and foreign bodies. Am J Dermatopathol. 1993;15:203-207.
  11. Semaan R, Traboulsi R, Kanj S. Primary Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex cutaneous infection: report of two cases and literature review. Int J Infect Dis. 2008;12:472-477.
  12. Lai-Cheong JE, Perez A, Tang V, et al. Cutaneous manifestations of tuberculosis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007;32:461-466.
  13. Marcoval J, Servitje O, Moreno A, et al. Lupus vulgaris. clinical, histopathologic, and bacteriologic study of 10 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26:404-407.
  14. Tronnier M, Wolff H. Dermatosen mit granulomatöser Entzündung. Histopathologie der Haut. In: Kerl H, Garbe C, Cerroni L, et al, eds. New York, NY: Springer; 2003.
  15. Min KW, Ko JY, Park CK. Histopathological spectrum of cutaneous tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections. J Cutan Pathol. 2012;39:582-595.
  16. Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Bacon PA, et al. 2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference nomenclature of vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:1-11.
  17. Comfere NI, Macaron NC, Gibson LE. Cutaneous manifestations of Wegener's granulomatosis: a clinicopathologic study of 17 patients and correlation to antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody status. J Cutan Pathol. 2007;34:739-747.
  18. Marzano AV, Vezzoli P, Berti E. Skin involvement in cutaneous and systemic vasculitis. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;12:467-476.
  19. Bramsiepe I, Danz B, Heine R, et al. Primary cutaneous manifestation of Wegener's granulomatosis [in German]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008;27:1429-1432.
  20. Daoud MS, Gibson LE, DeRemee RA, et al. Cutaneous Wegener's granulomatosis: clinical, histopathologic, and immunopathologic features of thirty patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;31:605-612.
  21. Guidry JA, Downing C, Tyring SK. Deep fungal infections, blastomycosis-like pyoderma, and granulomatous sexually transmitted infections. Dermatol Clin. 2015;33:595-607.
Issue
Cutis - 101(4)
Issue
Cutis - 101(4)
Page Number
248, 255-256, 259
Page Number
248, 255-256, 259
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Perianal Condyloma Acuminatum-like Plaque
Display Headline
Perianal Condyloma Acuminatum-like Plaque
Sections
Questionnaire Body

H&E, original magnification ×40; inset, H&E, original magnification ×100.

A 19-year-old man presented with a perianal condyloma acuminatum-like plaque of 2 years' duration and a 6-month history of diarrhea.

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 04/04/2018 - 11:45
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 04/04/2018 - 11:45
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media