User login
Hamstring tendinopathy implicated in persistent Lyme arthritis
CHICAGO – The big news regarding Lyme disease at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology was a report that hamstring tendon calcification is extremely common among patients who have persistent Lyme arthritis despite having undergone appropriate antibiotic therapy.
“This is a fascinating study,” Robert A. Kalish, MD, a Lyme disease expert not involved in the research, said regarding the report by Sheila L. Arvikar, MD, and her coworkers at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
One implication of this finding by a renowned group of Lyme disease researchers is that persistent posttreatment Lyme arthritis may in many cases be due to ongoing immunostimulation by spirochete remains located in hamstring tendons, a privileged, relatively avascular site where the foreign material may be able to evade immune clearance.
Also, as Dr. Arvikar pointed out in her presentation, calcific tendinopathy implies prior inflammation or degenerative changes. Thus, these calcific hamstring abnormalities implicate the hamstring tendons as a potential initial site of infection by hematogenously-spread Borrelia burgdorferi during the prearthritis phase of Lyme disease.
A further implication of the study is the possibility that hamstring tendon calcification could serve as a useful diagnostic aid in distinguishing Lyme arthritis from arthritis due to other causes. In the study, hamstring calcific tendinopathy was found in 28 of 31 adults and children with Lyme arthritis, 3 of 22 with knee osteoarthritis, and 1 of 14 patients with inflammatory arthritis, Dr. Arvikar noted.
She and her coinvestigators evaluated tendon pathology in their retrospective study of patients at the Massachusetts General Hospital Rheumatology Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Clinic. They used ultrasound because they have found it offers far better spatial resolution of calcification than does MRI or x-rays. The semimembranosus tendon was the hamstring tendon that most commonly exhibited calcification, although 11 patients with Lyme arthritis also had involvement of the semitendinosus tendon, compared with none of the controls with osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis.
In the eight patients with serial ultrasound evaluations over a period of up to 12 months, the calcification persisted but the symptoms of tendinitis and synovitis improved.
Dr. Arvikar and her colleagues are expanding the scope of their ongoing study by examining patients whose Lyme arthritis is milder than that of the initial population, including patients who haven’t yet received antibiotics. They are also evaluating more controls with inflammatory arthritis.
In a separate presentation, Dr. Kalish noted that Lyme arthritis, the manifestation of Lyme disease of greatest interest to rheumatologists, occurs in about 60% of untreated patients, with onset a mean of 6 months after the tick bite. It typically entails recurrent mono- or oligoarthritis of large joints. The knee is involved in roughly 95% of cases.
The natural history of untreated Lyme arthritis is a spontaneous resolution rate of 10%-20% per year. Since the 1980s, however, 4 weeks of oral doxycycline or amoxicillin has been the treatment of choice. About 10% of patients with Lyme arthritis continue to have active synovitis 3 months after their course of antibiotics.
“There are some patients you give the treatment to and their arthritis just melts away in a month, but some, no matter what you do with antibiotics, continue to have synovitis, often developing a highly proliferative palpable synovitis that is really gunked up and features obliterative microvascular lesions,” observed Dr. Kalish, a rheumatologist at Tufts University in Boston.
Dr. Kalish said that persistent posttreatment Lyme arthritis is most often due to a self-perpetuating immune response after the spirochete has been killed by antibiotics. He noted that patients with certain HLA-DRB1 haplotypes are more likely to experience persistent Lyme arthritis after standard recommended courses of antibiotics, and these DRB1 alleles correlate closely with the shared epitope associated with increased susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. Several candidate autoantigens have already been identified.
He noted that the Massachusetts General group, in an earlier study, demonstrated that the presence of B. burgdorferi DNA by PCR in synovial fluid from patients with persistent Lyme arthritis after antibiotic therapy was not a reliable indicator of active joint infection (Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Aug;63[8]:2238-47).
“This was a paradigm change for me in seeing this study, because prior to that I had used PCR somewhat to guide treatment and make management decisions,” Dr. Kalish said.
What’s a reasonable treatment strategy in patients with persistent Lyme arthritis despite 30 days of oral antibiotics? Dr. Kalish favors an algorithm similar to one published by Dr. Arvikar and Allen C. Steere, MD (Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015 Jun;29[2]:269-80). In the case of mild persistent arthritis, he opts for another 30 days of oral doxycycline. If the arthritis is moderate or severe, he goes with either another 30 days of doxycycline or 30 days of intravenous ceftriaxone.
If the arthritis still hasn’t resolved despite two 30-day rounds of antibiotic therapy, he prescribes an NSAID or hydroxychloroquine if the persistent arthritis is mild, or methotrexate if it’s moderate to severe. And if the arthritis still persists after 3-6 months of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy, he’ll consider synovectomy, which has a good success rate.
Neither Dr. Arvikar nor Dr. Kalish reported having any financial conflicts regarding their presentations.
SOURCE: Arvikar SL et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract 950.
CHICAGO – The big news regarding Lyme disease at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology was a report that hamstring tendon calcification is extremely common among patients who have persistent Lyme arthritis despite having undergone appropriate antibiotic therapy.
“This is a fascinating study,” Robert A. Kalish, MD, a Lyme disease expert not involved in the research, said regarding the report by Sheila L. Arvikar, MD, and her coworkers at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
One implication of this finding by a renowned group of Lyme disease researchers is that persistent posttreatment Lyme arthritis may in many cases be due to ongoing immunostimulation by spirochete remains located in hamstring tendons, a privileged, relatively avascular site where the foreign material may be able to evade immune clearance.
Also, as Dr. Arvikar pointed out in her presentation, calcific tendinopathy implies prior inflammation or degenerative changes. Thus, these calcific hamstring abnormalities implicate the hamstring tendons as a potential initial site of infection by hematogenously-spread Borrelia burgdorferi during the prearthritis phase of Lyme disease.
A further implication of the study is the possibility that hamstring tendon calcification could serve as a useful diagnostic aid in distinguishing Lyme arthritis from arthritis due to other causes. In the study, hamstring calcific tendinopathy was found in 28 of 31 adults and children with Lyme arthritis, 3 of 22 with knee osteoarthritis, and 1 of 14 patients with inflammatory arthritis, Dr. Arvikar noted.
She and her coinvestigators evaluated tendon pathology in their retrospective study of patients at the Massachusetts General Hospital Rheumatology Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Clinic. They used ultrasound because they have found it offers far better spatial resolution of calcification than does MRI or x-rays. The semimembranosus tendon was the hamstring tendon that most commonly exhibited calcification, although 11 patients with Lyme arthritis also had involvement of the semitendinosus tendon, compared with none of the controls with osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis.
In the eight patients with serial ultrasound evaluations over a period of up to 12 months, the calcification persisted but the symptoms of tendinitis and synovitis improved.
Dr. Arvikar and her colleagues are expanding the scope of their ongoing study by examining patients whose Lyme arthritis is milder than that of the initial population, including patients who haven’t yet received antibiotics. They are also evaluating more controls with inflammatory arthritis.
In a separate presentation, Dr. Kalish noted that Lyme arthritis, the manifestation of Lyme disease of greatest interest to rheumatologists, occurs in about 60% of untreated patients, with onset a mean of 6 months after the tick bite. It typically entails recurrent mono- or oligoarthritis of large joints. The knee is involved in roughly 95% of cases.
The natural history of untreated Lyme arthritis is a spontaneous resolution rate of 10%-20% per year. Since the 1980s, however, 4 weeks of oral doxycycline or amoxicillin has been the treatment of choice. About 10% of patients with Lyme arthritis continue to have active synovitis 3 months after their course of antibiotics.
“There are some patients you give the treatment to and their arthritis just melts away in a month, but some, no matter what you do with antibiotics, continue to have synovitis, often developing a highly proliferative palpable synovitis that is really gunked up and features obliterative microvascular lesions,” observed Dr. Kalish, a rheumatologist at Tufts University in Boston.
Dr. Kalish said that persistent posttreatment Lyme arthritis is most often due to a self-perpetuating immune response after the spirochete has been killed by antibiotics. He noted that patients with certain HLA-DRB1 haplotypes are more likely to experience persistent Lyme arthritis after standard recommended courses of antibiotics, and these DRB1 alleles correlate closely with the shared epitope associated with increased susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. Several candidate autoantigens have already been identified.
He noted that the Massachusetts General group, in an earlier study, demonstrated that the presence of B. burgdorferi DNA by PCR in synovial fluid from patients with persistent Lyme arthritis after antibiotic therapy was not a reliable indicator of active joint infection (Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Aug;63[8]:2238-47).
“This was a paradigm change for me in seeing this study, because prior to that I had used PCR somewhat to guide treatment and make management decisions,” Dr. Kalish said.
What’s a reasonable treatment strategy in patients with persistent Lyme arthritis despite 30 days of oral antibiotics? Dr. Kalish favors an algorithm similar to one published by Dr. Arvikar and Allen C. Steere, MD (Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015 Jun;29[2]:269-80). In the case of mild persistent arthritis, he opts for another 30 days of oral doxycycline. If the arthritis is moderate or severe, he goes with either another 30 days of doxycycline or 30 days of intravenous ceftriaxone.
If the arthritis still hasn’t resolved despite two 30-day rounds of antibiotic therapy, he prescribes an NSAID or hydroxychloroquine if the persistent arthritis is mild, or methotrexate if it’s moderate to severe. And if the arthritis still persists after 3-6 months of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy, he’ll consider synovectomy, which has a good success rate.
Neither Dr. Arvikar nor Dr. Kalish reported having any financial conflicts regarding their presentations.
SOURCE: Arvikar SL et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract 950.
CHICAGO – The big news regarding Lyme disease at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology was a report that hamstring tendon calcification is extremely common among patients who have persistent Lyme arthritis despite having undergone appropriate antibiotic therapy.
“This is a fascinating study,” Robert A. Kalish, MD, a Lyme disease expert not involved in the research, said regarding the report by Sheila L. Arvikar, MD, and her coworkers at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
One implication of this finding by a renowned group of Lyme disease researchers is that persistent posttreatment Lyme arthritis may in many cases be due to ongoing immunostimulation by spirochete remains located in hamstring tendons, a privileged, relatively avascular site where the foreign material may be able to evade immune clearance.
Also, as Dr. Arvikar pointed out in her presentation, calcific tendinopathy implies prior inflammation or degenerative changes. Thus, these calcific hamstring abnormalities implicate the hamstring tendons as a potential initial site of infection by hematogenously-spread Borrelia burgdorferi during the prearthritis phase of Lyme disease.
A further implication of the study is the possibility that hamstring tendon calcification could serve as a useful diagnostic aid in distinguishing Lyme arthritis from arthritis due to other causes. In the study, hamstring calcific tendinopathy was found in 28 of 31 adults and children with Lyme arthritis, 3 of 22 with knee osteoarthritis, and 1 of 14 patients with inflammatory arthritis, Dr. Arvikar noted.
She and her coinvestigators evaluated tendon pathology in their retrospective study of patients at the Massachusetts General Hospital Rheumatology Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Clinic. They used ultrasound because they have found it offers far better spatial resolution of calcification than does MRI or x-rays. The semimembranosus tendon was the hamstring tendon that most commonly exhibited calcification, although 11 patients with Lyme arthritis also had involvement of the semitendinosus tendon, compared with none of the controls with osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis.
In the eight patients with serial ultrasound evaluations over a period of up to 12 months, the calcification persisted but the symptoms of tendinitis and synovitis improved.
Dr. Arvikar and her colleagues are expanding the scope of their ongoing study by examining patients whose Lyme arthritis is milder than that of the initial population, including patients who haven’t yet received antibiotics. They are also evaluating more controls with inflammatory arthritis.
In a separate presentation, Dr. Kalish noted that Lyme arthritis, the manifestation of Lyme disease of greatest interest to rheumatologists, occurs in about 60% of untreated patients, with onset a mean of 6 months after the tick bite. It typically entails recurrent mono- or oligoarthritis of large joints. The knee is involved in roughly 95% of cases.
The natural history of untreated Lyme arthritis is a spontaneous resolution rate of 10%-20% per year. Since the 1980s, however, 4 weeks of oral doxycycline or amoxicillin has been the treatment of choice. About 10% of patients with Lyme arthritis continue to have active synovitis 3 months after their course of antibiotics.
“There are some patients you give the treatment to and their arthritis just melts away in a month, but some, no matter what you do with antibiotics, continue to have synovitis, often developing a highly proliferative palpable synovitis that is really gunked up and features obliterative microvascular lesions,” observed Dr. Kalish, a rheumatologist at Tufts University in Boston.
Dr. Kalish said that persistent posttreatment Lyme arthritis is most often due to a self-perpetuating immune response after the spirochete has been killed by antibiotics. He noted that patients with certain HLA-DRB1 haplotypes are more likely to experience persistent Lyme arthritis after standard recommended courses of antibiotics, and these DRB1 alleles correlate closely with the shared epitope associated with increased susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. Several candidate autoantigens have already been identified.
He noted that the Massachusetts General group, in an earlier study, demonstrated that the presence of B. burgdorferi DNA by PCR in synovial fluid from patients with persistent Lyme arthritis after antibiotic therapy was not a reliable indicator of active joint infection (Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Aug;63[8]:2238-47).
“This was a paradigm change for me in seeing this study, because prior to that I had used PCR somewhat to guide treatment and make management decisions,” Dr. Kalish said.
What’s a reasonable treatment strategy in patients with persistent Lyme arthritis despite 30 days of oral antibiotics? Dr. Kalish favors an algorithm similar to one published by Dr. Arvikar and Allen C. Steere, MD (Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015 Jun;29[2]:269-80). In the case of mild persistent arthritis, he opts for another 30 days of oral doxycycline. If the arthritis is moderate or severe, he goes with either another 30 days of doxycycline or 30 days of intravenous ceftriaxone.
If the arthritis still hasn’t resolved despite two 30-day rounds of antibiotic therapy, he prescribes an NSAID or hydroxychloroquine if the persistent arthritis is mild, or methotrexate if it’s moderate to severe. And if the arthritis still persists after 3-6 months of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy, he’ll consider synovectomy, which has a good success rate.
Neither Dr. Arvikar nor Dr. Kalish reported having any financial conflicts regarding their presentations.
SOURCE: Arvikar SL et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract 950.
REPORTING FROM THE ACR ANNUAL MEETING
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Ultrasound evidence of hamstring calcific tendinopathy was found in 28 of 31 patients with persistent posttreatment Lyme arthritis, compared with 3 of 22 patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Study details: This was a retrospective imaging study of hamstring tendon status in 31 patients with persistent posttreatment Lyme arthritis, 22 patients with osteoarthritis, and 14 with inflammatory arthritis.
Disclosures: The presenter reported having no financial conflicts regarding the study, conducted free of commercial support.
Source: Arvikar SL et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract 950.
Federal Partners Developing Limb-Loss Registry
The NIH and DoD are working on a new database that aims to establish the number of people in the US living with limb loss and to provide insight on their challenges and needs.
The Limb Loss and Preservation Registry, expected to be operational in 2020, will address a “significant public health knowledge gap,” said Dr. Alison Cernich, director of the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. She says the information housed in the database will be vital to preventing limb loss, improving amputation surgeries, refining rehabilitation approaches, and guiding the development of devices for people who have lost limbs. Researchers will be able to sort the data by age, gender, and type of limb loss.
The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development has awarded a 5-year contract, capped at $5 million, to the Mayo Clinic to develop and launch the registry.
The NIH and DoD chose to join resources because there are not enough amputations within the DoD alone to provide a suitable sample for statistically valid conclusions, Dr. Cernich said. Moreover, data available from the DoD and the VA do not include service members who leave the military and seek care in the private sector. Cernich says the partnership between federal agencies will allow them to collect data that will “inform research and improve the lives of all citizens coping with limb loss.”
The NIH and DoD are working on a new database that aims to establish the number of people in the US living with limb loss and to provide insight on their challenges and needs.
The Limb Loss and Preservation Registry, expected to be operational in 2020, will address a “significant public health knowledge gap,” said Dr. Alison Cernich, director of the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. She says the information housed in the database will be vital to preventing limb loss, improving amputation surgeries, refining rehabilitation approaches, and guiding the development of devices for people who have lost limbs. Researchers will be able to sort the data by age, gender, and type of limb loss.
The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development has awarded a 5-year contract, capped at $5 million, to the Mayo Clinic to develop and launch the registry.
The NIH and DoD chose to join resources because there are not enough amputations within the DoD alone to provide a suitable sample for statistically valid conclusions, Dr. Cernich said. Moreover, data available from the DoD and the VA do not include service members who leave the military and seek care in the private sector. Cernich says the partnership between federal agencies will allow them to collect data that will “inform research and improve the lives of all citizens coping with limb loss.”
The NIH and DoD are working on a new database that aims to establish the number of people in the US living with limb loss and to provide insight on their challenges and needs.
The Limb Loss and Preservation Registry, expected to be operational in 2020, will address a “significant public health knowledge gap,” said Dr. Alison Cernich, director of the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. She says the information housed in the database will be vital to preventing limb loss, improving amputation surgeries, refining rehabilitation approaches, and guiding the development of devices for people who have lost limbs. Researchers will be able to sort the data by age, gender, and type of limb loss.
The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development has awarded a 5-year contract, capped at $5 million, to the Mayo Clinic to develop and launch the registry.
The NIH and DoD chose to join resources because there are not enough amputations within the DoD alone to provide a suitable sample for statistically valid conclusions, Dr. Cernich said. Moreover, data available from the DoD and the VA do not include service members who leave the military and seek care in the private sector. Cernich says the partnership between federal agencies will allow them to collect data that will “inform research and improve the lives of all citizens coping with limb loss.”
U.S. life expectancy drops
driving an increase in outpatient services, the American Society of Hematology releases new guidelines on VTE ahead of ASH 2018 and commentary from Francis Collins, MD, denouncing reports from China on CRISPR-cas9 editing on embryos.
Amazon Alexa
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify Also today, an increase of less-distressed patients is
driving an increase in outpatient services, the American Society of Hematology releases new guidelines on VTE ahead of ASH 2018 and commentary from Francis Collins, MD, denouncing reports from China on CRISPR-cas9 editing on embryos.
Amazon Alexa
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify Also today, an increase of less-distressed patients is
driving an increase in outpatient services, the American Society of Hematology releases new guidelines on VTE ahead of ASH 2018 and commentary from Francis Collins, MD, denouncing reports from China on CRISPR-cas9 editing on embryos.
Amazon Alexa
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify Also today, an increase of less-distressed patients is
Serious side effect of AML treatment going unnoticed, FDA warns
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has released a safety communication warning that cases of differentiation syndrome are going unnoticed in patients treated with the IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib (Idhifa).
Enasidenib is FDA-approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and an IDH2 mutation.
The drug is known to be associated with differentiation syndrome, and the prescribing information contains a boxed warning about this life-threatening condition.
However, the FDA has found that patients and healthcare providers are missing the signs and symptoms of differentiation syndrome, and some patients are not receiving the necessary treatment in time.
The FDA is also warning that differentiation syndrome has been observed in AML patients taking the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib (Tibsovo).
However, the agency has not provided many details on cases related to this drug, which is FDA-approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory AML who have an IDH1 mutation.
Recognizing differentiation syndrome
The FDA says differentiation syndrome may occur anywhere from 10 days to 5 months after starting enasidenib.
The agency is advising healthcare providers to describe the symptoms of differentiation syndrome to patients, both when starting them on enasidenib and at follow-up visits.
Symptoms of differentiation syndrome include:
- Acute respiratory distress represented by dyspnea and/or hypoxia and a need for supplemental oxygen
- Pulmonary infiltrates and pleural effusion
- Fever
- Lymphadenopathy
- Bone pain
- Peripheral edema with rapid weight gain
- Pericardial effusion
- Hepatic, renal, and multiorgan dysfunction.
The FDA notes that differentiation syndrome may be mistaken for cardiogenic pulmonary edema, pneumonia, or sepsis.
Treatment
If healthcare providers suspect differentiation syndrome, they should promptly administer oral or intravenous corticosteroids, such as dexamethasone at 10 mg every 12 hours, according to the FDA.
Providers should also monitor hemodynamics until improvement and provide supportive care as necessary.
If patients continue to experience renal dysfunction or severe pulmonary symptoms requiring intubation or ventilator support for more than 48 hours after starting corticosteroids, enasidenib should be stopped until signs and symptoms of differentiation syndrome are no longer severe.
Corticosteroids should be tapered only after the symptoms resolve completely, as differentiation syndrome may recur if treatment is stopped too soon.
Cases of differentiation syndrome
The FDA notes that, in the phase 1/2 trial that supported the U.S. approval of enasidenib, at least 14% of patients experienced differentiation syndrome.
The manufacturer’s latest safety report includes 5 deaths (from May 1, 2018, to July 31, 2018) associated with differentiation syndrome in patients taking enasidenib.
Differentiation syndrome was listed as the only cause of death in two cases. In the remaining three cases, patients also had hemorrhagic stroke, pneumonia and sepsis, and sepsis alone.
One patient received systemic corticosteroids promptly but may have died of sepsis during hospitalization. In another patient, differentiation syndrome was not diagnosed or treated promptly. Treatment details are not available for the remaining three patients, according to the FDA.
The FDA has also performed a systematic analysis of differentiation syndrome in 293 patients treated with enasidenib (n=214) or ivosidenib (n=179).
With both drugs, the incidence of differentiation syndrome was 19%. The condition was fatal in 6% (n=2) of ivosidenib-treated patients and 5% (n=2) of enasidenib-treated patients.
Additional results from this analysis are scheduled to be presented at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 288).
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has released a safety communication warning that cases of differentiation syndrome are going unnoticed in patients treated with the IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib (Idhifa).
Enasidenib is FDA-approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and an IDH2 mutation.
The drug is known to be associated with differentiation syndrome, and the prescribing information contains a boxed warning about this life-threatening condition.
However, the FDA has found that patients and healthcare providers are missing the signs and symptoms of differentiation syndrome, and some patients are not receiving the necessary treatment in time.
The FDA is also warning that differentiation syndrome has been observed in AML patients taking the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib (Tibsovo).
However, the agency has not provided many details on cases related to this drug, which is FDA-approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory AML who have an IDH1 mutation.
Recognizing differentiation syndrome
The FDA says differentiation syndrome may occur anywhere from 10 days to 5 months after starting enasidenib.
The agency is advising healthcare providers to describe the symptoms of differentiation syndrome to patients, both when starting them on enasidenib and at follow-up visits.
Symptoms of differentiation syndrome include:
- Acute respiratory distress represented by dyspnea and/or hypoxia and a need for supplemental oxygen
- Pulmonary infiltrates and pleural effusion
- Fever
- Lymphadenopathy
- Bone pain
- Peripheral edema with rapid weight gain
- Pericardial effusion
- Hepatic, renal, and multiorgan dysfunction.
The FDA notes that differentiation syndrome may be mistaken for cardiogenic pulmonary edema, pneumonia, or sepsis.
Treatment
If healthcare providers suspect differentiation syndrome, they should promptly administer oral or intravenous corticosteroids, such as dexamethasone at 10 mg every 12 hours, according to the FDA.
Providers should also monitor hemodynamics until improvement and provide supportive care as necessary.
If patients continue to experience renal dysfunction or severe pulmonary symptoms requiring intubation or ventilator support for more than 48 hours after starting corticosteroids, enasidenib should be stopped until signs and symptoms of differentiation syndrome are no longer severe.
Corticosteroids should be tapered only after the symptoms resolve completely, as differentiation syndrome may recur if treatment is stopped too soon.
Cases of differentiation syndrome
The FDA notes that, in the phase 1/2 trial that supported the U.S. approval of enasidenib, at least 14% of patients experienced differentiation syndrome.
The manufacturer’s latest safety report includes 5 deaths (from May 1, 2018, to July 31, 2018) associated with differentiation syndrome in patients taking enasidenib.
Differentiation syndrome was listed as the only cause of death in two cases. In the remaining three cases, patients also had hemorrhagic stroke, pneumonia and sepsis, and sepsis alone.
One patient received systemic corticosteroids promptly but may have died of sepsis during hospitalization. In another patient, differentiation syndrome was not diagnosed or treated promptly. Treatment details are not available for the remaining three patients, according to the FDA.
The FDA has also performed a systematic analysis of differentiation syndrome in 293 patients treated with enasidenib (n=214) or ivosidenib (n=179).
With both drugs, the incidence of differentiation syndrome was 19%. The condition was fatal in 6% (n=2) of ivosidenib-treated patients and 5% (n=2) of enasidenib-treated patients.
Additional results from this analysis are scheduled to be presented at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 288).
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has released a safety communication warning that cases of differentiation syndrome are going unnoticed in patients treated with the IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib (Idhifa).
Enasidenib is FDA-approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and an IDH2 mutation.
The drug is known to be associated with differentiation syndrome, and the prescribing information contains a boxed warning about this life-threatening condition.
However, the FDA has found that patients and healthcare providers are missing the signs and symptoms of differentiation syndrome, and some patients are not receiving the necessary treatment in time.
The FDA is also warning that differentiation syndrome has been observed in AML patients taking the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib (Tibsovo).
However, the agency has not provided many details on cases related to this drug, which is FDA-approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory AML who have an IDH1 mutation.
Recognizing differentiation syndrome
The FDA says differentiation syndrome may occur anywhere from 10 days to 5 months after starting enasidenib.
The agency is advising healthcare providers to describe the symptoms of differentiation syndrome to patients, both when starting them on enasidenib and at follow-up visits.
Symptoms of differentiation syndrome include:
- Acute respiratory distress represented by dyspnea and/or hypoxia and a need for supplemental oxygen
- Pulmonary infiltrates and pleural effusion
- Fever
- Lymphadenopathy
- Bone pain
- Peripheral edema with rapid weight gain
- Pericardial effusion
- Hepatic, renal, and multiorgan dysfunction.
The FDA notes that differentiation syndrome may be mistaken for cardiogenic pulmonary edema, pneumonia, or sepsis.
Treatment
If healthcare providers suspect differentiation syndrome, they should promptly administer oral or intravenous corticosteroids, such as dexamethasone at 10 mg every 12 hours, according to the FDA.
Providers should also monitor hemodynamics until improvement and provide supportive care as necessary.
If patients continue to experience renal dysfunction or severe pulmonary symptoms requiring intubation or ventilator support for more than 48 hours after starting corticosteroids, enasidenib should be stopped until signs and symptoms of differentiation syndrome are no longer severe.
Corticosteroids should be tapered only after the symptoms resolve completely, as differentiation syndrome may recur if treatment is stopped too soon.
Cases of differentiation syndrome
The FDA notes that, in the phase 1/2 trial that supported the U.S. approval of enasidenib, at least 14% of patients experienced differentiation syndrome.
The manufacturer’s latest safety report includes 5 deaths (from May 1, 2018, to July 31, 2018) associated with differentiation syndrome in patients taking enasidenib.
Differentiation syndrome was listed as the only cause of death in two cases. In the remaining three cases, patients also had hemorrhagic stroke, pneumonia and sepsis, and sepsis alone.
One patient received systemic corticosteroids promptly but may have died of sepsis during hospitalization. In another patient, differentiation syndrome was not diagnosed or treated promptly. Treatment details are not available for the remaining three patients, according to the FDA.
The FDA has also performed a systematic analysis of differentiation syndrome in 293 patients treated with enasidenib (n=214) or ivosidenib (n=179).
With both drugs, the incidence of differentiation syndrome was 19%. The condition was fatal in 6% (n=2) of ivosidenib-treated patients and 5% (n=2) of enasidenib-treated patients.
Additional results from this analysis are scheduled to be presented at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 288).
Your guide to ASH 2018: Abstracts to watch
With more than 3,000 scientific abstracts at the 2018 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, it can be tough to figure out what research is most relevant to practice. But the editorial advisory board of Hematology News is making it easier this year with their picks for what to watch and why.
Lymphomas
Brian T. Hill, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic, offered his top picks in lymphoma research. Results of the phase 3 international Alliance North American Intergroup Study A041202 will be presented during the ASH plenary session at 2 p.m. PT on Sunday, Dec. 2 in Hall AB of the San Diego Convention Center (Abstract 6). The study compared bendamustine plus rituximab with ibrutinib and the combination of ibrutinib plus rituximab to see if the ibrutinib-containing therapies would have superior progression-free survival (PFS) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), compared with chemoimmunotherapy. Results indicate that ibrutinib had superior PFS in older patients with CLL and could be a standard of care in this population.
The study is worth watching because it is the first report of a head-to-head trial of chemotherapy versus ibrutinib for first-line treatment of CLL, Dr. Hill said.
Two more studies offer important reports of “real world” experiences with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.
In one multicenter retrospective study, researchers evaluated the outcomes of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma when it is used a standard care. The researchers will report that 30-day responses in the real-world setting were comparable to the best responses seen in the ZUMA-1 trial. The full results will be reported at 9:30 a.m. PT on Saturday, Dec. 1 in Pacific Ballroom 20 of the Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina (Abstract 91).
Another retrospective analysis looked at the use of axi-cell and revealed some critical differences from ZUMA-1, specifically the overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were lower than those reported in the pivotal clinical trial. The findings will be reported at 9:45 a.m. PT on Saturday, Dec. 1 in Pacific Ballroom 20 of the Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina (Abstract 92).
Researchers will also present the unblinded results from the ECHELON-2 study, which compared the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (CHP) versus standard CHOP for the treatment of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma. The results will be presented at 6:15 p.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in room 6F of the San Diego convention center (Abstract 997).
Previously reported blinded pooled data showed that the treatment was well tolerated with 3-year PFS of 53% and OS of 73%.
“This should be a new standard of care for T-cell lymphomas,” Dr. Hill said.
CAR T-cell therapy
There are a number of abstracts featuring the latest results on CAR T-cell therapy. Helen Heslop, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, recommended an updated analysis from the ELIANA study, which looked at the efficacy and safety of tisagenlecleucel in for children and young adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
“Longer-term follow-up of the ELIANA study shows encouraging remission-duration data in pediatric and young adults with ALL without additional therapy,” Dr. Heslop said.
The findings will be presented at 4:30 p.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in room 6A at the San Diego Convention Center (Abstract 895).
Another notable presentation will feature results from a phase 1B/2 trial evaluating infusion of CAR T cells targeting the CD30 molecule and encoding the CD28 endodomain (CD30.CAR-Ts) after lymphodepleting chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
The researchers will report that there was a significant PFS advances for who received the highest dose level of the CAR T treatment, combined with bendamustine and fludarabine.
The study will be presented at 11 a.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in room 6F at the San Diego Convention Center (Abstract 681).
Dr. Heslop also recommends another study being presented in the same session, which also shows encouraging results with CD30.CAR-Ts. Dr. Heslop is one of the co-investigators on the phase 1 RELY-30 trial, which is evaluating the efficacy of CD30.CAR-Ts after lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Preliminary results suggest a substantial improvement in efficacy. The findings will be presented at 10:45 a.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in room 6F of the San Diego Convention Center (Abstract 680).
MDS/MPN
Vikas Gupta, MD, of Princess Margaret Cancer Center in Toronto, highlighted three abstracts to watch in the areas of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN).
The phase 3 Medalist trial is a randomized double-blind placebo controlled study of luspatercept to treatment anemia in patients with MDS with ring sideroblasts who require red blood cell transfusion. The researchers will report significantly reduced transfusion burdens for luspatercept, compared with placebo.
“This is a practice-changing, pivotal trial in the field of MDS for the treatment of anemia,” Dr. Gupta said.
The findings will be presented at 2 p.m. PT on Sunday, Dec. 2 during the plenary session in Hall AB in the San Diego Convention Center (Abstract 1).
Also during the Sunday plenary session is a presentation on MPN therapy (Abstract 4). Researchers will present data on secreted mutant calreticulins as rogue cytokines trigger thrombopoietin receptor (TpoR) activation, specifically in CALR-mutated cells.
“This study investigates in to the mechanistic oncogenetic aspects of mutant calreticulin, and has potential for therapeutic approaches in the future,” Dr. Gupta said.
The ASH meeting will also feature the final analysis of the MPN-RC 112 consortium trial of pegylated interferon alfa-2a versus hydroxyurea for the treatment of high-risk polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). The researchers will report that the CR rates at 12 and 24 months were similar in patients treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2a and hydroxyurea, but pegylated interferon alfa-2a was associated with a higher rate of serious toxicities.
“There is a continuous debate on optimal first-line cytoreductive therapy for high risk PV/ET, and this is one of the first randomized study to answer this question,” Dr. Gupta said.
The findings will be presented at 7 a.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in Grand Hall D at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (Abstract 577).
AML
For attendees interested in the latest developments in acute myeloid leukemia, Thomas Fischer, MD, of Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg (Germany), highlighted three don’t-miss sessions.
In an analysis of a large cohort of FLT3-ITD mutated AML patients in the RATIFY trial, researchers looked at the prognostic impact of ITD insertion site.
“Interestingly, in this large cohort of 452 FLT3-ITD mutated AML, the negative prognostic impact of beta1-sheet insertion site of FLT3-ITD could be confirmed,” Dr. Fischer said. “Further analysis of a potential predictive effect on outcome of midostaurin treatment is ongoing and will be very interesting.”
The findings will be presented at 5 p.m. PT on Sunday, Dec. 2 in Seaport Ballroom F at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (Abstract 435).
Another notable presentation features results from the phase 2 RADIUS trial, a randomized study comparing standard of care, with and without midostaurin, after allogeneic stem cell transplant in FLT3-ITD–mutated AML.
“Here, efficacy and toxicity of midostaurin was investigated in a [minimal residual disease] situation post-alloSCT,” Dr. Fischer said. “Interestingly, adding midostaurin to standard of care reduced the risk of relapse at 18 months post-alloSCT by 46%.”
The complete findings will be presented at 10:45 a.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in Seaport Ballroom F at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (Abstract 662).
Dr. Fischer singled out another study looking at the efficacy and safety of single-agent quizartinib in patients with FLT3-ITD mutated AML. In this large, randomized trial the researchers noted a significant improvement in CR rates and survival benefit with the single agent FLT3 inhibitors, compared with salvage chemotherapy for patients with relapsed/refractory mutated AML.
The findings will be presented at 8 a.m. on Monday, Dec. 3 in Seaport Ballroom F at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (Abstract 563).
Notable posters
Iberia Romina Sosa, MD, PhD, of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, suggested several posters worth visiting in the areas of thrombosis and bleeding.
Poster 1134 looks at the TNF-alpha driven inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction in the platelet hyperreactivity of aging and MPN.
How do you know if your therapy for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura is working? Poster 3736 examines the measurement of cell-derived microparticles as a possible tool to monitor response to therapy.
You don’t have to be taking aspirin to have a bleeding profile characteristic with consumption of a cyclooxygenase inhibitor. Poster 1156 provides a first report of a platelet function disorder caused by autosomal recessive inheritance of PTGS1.
Poster 2477 takes a closer look at fitusiran, an antithrombin inhibitor, which improves thrombin generation in patients with hemophilia A or B. Protocol amendments for safety monitoring move fitusiran to phase 3 trials, Dr. Sosa said.
With more than 3,000 scientific abstracts at the 2018 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, it can be tough to figure out what research is most relevant to practice. But the editorial advisory board of Hematology News is making it easier this year with their picks for what to watch and why.
Lymphomas
Brian T. Hill, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic, offered his top picks in lymphoma research. Results of the phase 3 international Alliance North American Intergroup Study A041202 will be presented during the ASH plenary session at 2 p.m. PT on Sunday, Dec. 2 in Hall AB of the San Diego Convention Center (Abstract 6). The study compared bendamustine plus rituximab with ibrutinib and the combination of ibrutinib plus rituximab to see if the ibrutinib-containing therapies would have superior progression-free survival (PFS) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), compared with chemoimmunotherapy. Results indicate that ibrutinib had superior PFS in older patients with CLL and could be a standard of care in this population.
The study is worth watching because it is the first report of a head-to-head trial of chemotherapy versus ibrutinib for first-line treatment of CLL, Dr. Hill said.
Two more studies offer important reports of “real world” experiences with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.
In one multicenter retrospective study, researchers evaluated the outcomes of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma when it is used a standard care. The researchers will report that 30-day responses in the real-world setting were comparable to the best responses seen in the ZUMA-1 trial. The full results will be reported at 9:30 a.m. PT on Saturday, Dec. 1 in Pacific Ballroom 20 of the Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina (Abstract 91).
Another retrospective analysis looked at the use of axi-cell and revealed some critical differences from ZUMA-1, specifically the overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were lower than those reported in the pivotal clinical trial. The findings will be reported at 9:45 a.m. PT on Saturday, Dec. 1 in Pacific Ballroom 20 of the Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina (Abstract 92).
Researchers will also present the unblinded results from the ECHELON-2 study, which compared the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (CHP) versus standard CHOP for the treatment of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma. The results will be presented at 6:15 p.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in room 6F of the San Diego convention center (Abstract 997).
Previously reported blinded pooled data showed that the treatment was well tolerated with 3-year PFS of 53% and OS of 73%.
“This should be a new standard of care for T-cell lymphomas,” Dr. Hill said.
CAR T-cell therapy
There are a number of abstracts featuring the latest results on CAR T-cell therapy. Helen Heslop, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, recommended an updated analysis from the ELIANA study, which looked at the efficacy and safety of tisagenlecleucel in for children and young adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
“Longer-term follow-up of the ELIANA study shows encouraging remission-duration data in pediatric and young adults with ALL without additional therapy,” Dr. Heslop said.
The findings will be presented at 4:30 p.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in room 6A at the San Diego Convention Center (Abstract 895).
Another notable presentation will feature results from a phase 1B/2 trial evaluating infusion of CAR T cells targeting the CD30 molecule and encoding the CD28 endodomain (CD30.CAR-Ts) after lymphodepleting chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
The researchers will report that there was a significant PFS advances for who received the highest dose level of the CAR T treatment, combined with bendamustine and fludarabine.
The study will be presented at 11 a.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in room 6F at the San Diego Convention Center (Abstract 681).
Dr. Heslop also recommends another study being presented in the same session, which also shows encouraging results with CD30.CAR-Ts. Dr. Heslop is one of the co-investigators on the phase 1 RELY-30 trial, which is evaluating the efficacy of CD30.CAR-Ts after lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Preliminary results suggest a substantial improvement in efficacy. The findings will be presented at 10:45 a.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in room 6F of the San Diego Convention Center (Abstract 680).
MDS/MPN
Vikas Gupta, MD, of Princess Margaret Cancer Center in Toronto, highlighted three abstracts to watch in the areas of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN).
The phase 3 Medalist trial is a randomized double-blind placebo controlled study of luspatercept to treatment anemia in patients with MDS with ring sideroblasts who require red blood cell transfusion. The researchers will report significantly reduced transfusion burdens for luspatercept, compared with placebo.
“This is a practice-changing, pivotal trial in the field of MDS for the treatment of anemia,” Dr. Gupta said.
The findings will be presented at 2 p.m. PT on Sunday, Dec. 2 during the plenary session in Hall AB in the San Diego Convention Center (Abstract 1).
Also during the Sunday plenary session is a presentation on MPN therapy (Abstract 4). Researchers will present data on secreted mutant calreticulins as rogue cytokines trigger thrombopoietin receptor (TpoR) activation, specifically in CALR-mutated cells.
“This study investigates in to the mechanistic oncogenetic aspects of mutant calreticulin, and has potential for therapeutic approaches in the future,” Dr. Gupta said.
The ASH meeting will also feature the final analysis of the MPN-RC 112 consortium trial of pegylated interferon alfa-2a versus hydroxyurea for the treatment of high-risk polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). The researchers will report that the CR rates at 12 and 24 months were similar in patients treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2a and hydroxyurea, but pegylated interferon alfa-2a was associated with a higher rate of serious toxicities.
“There is a continuous debate on optimal first-line cytoreductive therapy for high risk PV/ET, and this is one of the first randomized study to answer this question,” Dr. Gupta said.
The findings will be presented at 7 a.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in Grand Hall D at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (Abstract 577).
AML
For attendees interested in the latest developments in acute myeloid leukemia, Thomas Fischer, MD, of Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg (Germany), highlighted three don’t-miss sessions.
In an analysis of a large cohort of FLT3-ITD mutated AML patients in the RATIFY trial, researchers looked at the prognostic impact of ITD insertion site.
“Interestingly, in this large cohort of 452 FLT3-ITD mutated AML, the negative prognostic impact of beta1-sheet insertion site of FLT3-ITD could be confirmed,” Dr. Fischer said. “Further analysis of a potential predictive effect on outcome of midostaurin treatment is ongoing and will be very interesting.”
The findings will be presented at 5 p.m. PT on Sunday, Dec. 2 in Seaport Ballroom F at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (Abstract 435).
Another notable presentation features results from the phase 2 RADIUS trial, a randomized study comparing standard of care, with and without midostaurin, after allogeneic stem cell transplant in FLT3-ITD–mutated AML.
“Here, efficacy and toxicity of midostaurin was investigated in a [minimal residual disease] situation post-alloSCT,” Dr. Fischer said. “Interestingly, adding midostaurin to standard of care reduced the risk of relapse at 18 months post-alloSCT by 46%.”
The complete findings will be presented at 10:45 a.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in Seaport Ballroom F at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (Abstract 662).
Dr. Fischer singled out another study looking at the efficacy and safety of single-agent quizartinib in patients with FLT3-ITD mutated AML. In this large, randomized trial the researchers noted a significant improvement in CR rates and survival benefit with the single agent FLT3 inhibitors, compared with salvage chemotherapy for patients with relapsed/refractory mutated AML.
The findings will be presented at 8 a.m. on Monday, Dec. 3 in Seaport Ballroom F at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (Abstract 563).
Notable posters
Iberia Romina Sosa, MD, PhD, of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, suggested several posters worth visiting in the areas of thrombosis and bleeding.
Poster 1134 looks at the TNF-alpha driven inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction in the platelet hyperreactivity of aging and MPN.
How do you know if your therapy for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura is working? Poster 3736 examines the measurement of cell-derived microparticles as a possible tool to monitor response to therapy.
You don’t have to be taking aspirin to have a bleeding profile characteristic with consumption of a cyclooxygenase inhibitor. Poster 1156 provides a first report of a platelet function disorder caused by autosomal recessive inheritance of PTGS1.
Poster 2477 takes a closer look at fitusiran, an antithrombin inhibitor, which improves thrombin generation in patients with hemophilia A or B. Protocol amendments for safety monitoring move fitusiran to phase 3 trials, Dr. Sosa said.
With more than 3,000 scientific abstracts at the 2018 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, it can be tough to figure out what research is most relevant to practice. But the editorial advisory board of Hematology News is making it easier this year with their picks for what to watch and why.
Lymphomas
Brian T. Hill, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic, offered his top picks in lymphoma research. Results of the phase 3 international Alliance North American Intergroup Study A041202 will be presented during the ASH plenary session at 2 p.m. PT on Sunday, Dec. 2 in Hall AB of the San Diego Convention Center (Abstract 6). The study compared bendamustine plus rituximab with ibrutinib and the combination of ibrutinib plus rituximab to see if the ibrutinib-containing therapies would have superior progression-free survival (PFS) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), compared with chemoimmunotherapy. Results indicate that ibrutinib had superior PFS in older patients with CLL and could be a standard of care in this population.
The study is worth watching because it is the first report of a head-to-head trial of chemotherapy versus ibrutinib for first-line treatment of CLL, Dr. Hill said.
Two more studies offer important reports of “real world” experiences with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.
In one multicenter retrospective study, researchers evaluated the outcomes of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma when it is used a standard care. The researchers will report that 30-day responses in the real-world setting were comparable to the best responses seen in the ZUMA-1 trial. The full results will be reported at 9:30 a.m. PT on Saturday, Dec. 1 in Pacific Ballroom 20 of the Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina (Abstract 91).
Another retrospective analysis looked at the use of axi-cell and revealed some critical differences from ZUMA-1, specifically the overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were lower than those reported in the pivotal clinical trial. The findings will be reported at 9:45 a.m. PT on Saturday, Dec. 1 in Pacific Ballroom 20 of the Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina (Abstract 92).
Researchers will also present the unblinded results from the ECHELON-2 study, which compared the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (CHP) versus standard CHOP for the treatment of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma. The results will be presented at 6:15 p.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in room 6F of the San Diego convention center (Abstract 997).
Previously reported blinded pooled data showed that the treatment was well tolerated with 3-year PFS of 53% and OS of 73%.
“This should be a new standard of care for T-cell lymphomas,” Dr. Hill said.
CAR T-cell therapy
There are a number of abstracts featuring the latest results on CAR T-cell therapy. Helen Heslop, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, recommended an updated analysis from the ELIANA study, which looked at the efficacy and safety of tisagenlecleucel in for children and young adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
“Longer-term follow-up of the ELIANA study shows encouraging remission-duration data in pediatric and young adults with ALL without additional therapy,” Dr. Heslop said.
The findings will be presented at 4:30 p.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in room 6A at the San Diego Convention Center (Abstract 895).
Another notable presentation will feature results from a phase 1B/2 trial evaluating infusion of CAR T cells targeting the CD30 molecule and encoding the CD28 endodomain (CD30.CAR-Ts) after lymphodepleting chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
The researchers will report that there was a significant PFS advances for who received the highest dose level of the CAR T treatment, combined with bendamustine and fludarabine.
The study will be presented at 11 a.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in room 6F at the San Diego Convention Center (Abstract 681).
Dr. Heslop also recommends another study being presented in the same session, which also shows encouraging results with CD30.CAR-Ts. Dr. Heslop is one of the co-investigators on the phase 1 RELY-30 trial, which is evaluating the efficacy of CD30.CAR-Ts after lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Preliminary results suggest a substantial improvement in efficacy. The findings will be presented at 10:45 a.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in room 6F of the San Diego Convention Center (Abstract 680).
MDS/MPN
Vikas Gupta, MD, of Princess Margaret Cancer Center in Toronto, highlighted three abstracts to watch in the areas of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN).
The phase 3 Medalist trial is a randomized double-blind placebo controlled study of luspatercept to treatment anemia in patients with MDS with ring sideroblasts who require red blood cell transfusion. The researchers will report significantly reduced transfusion burdens for luspatercept, compared with placebo.
“This is a practice-changing, pivotal trial in the field of MDS for the treatment of anemia,” Dr. Gupta said.
The findings will be presented at 2 p.m. PT on Sunday, Dec. 2 during the plenary session in Hall AB in the San Diego Convention Center (Abstract 1).
Also during the Sunday plenary session is a presentation on MPN therapy (Abstract 4). Researchers will present data on secreted mutant calreticulins as rogue cytokines trigger thrombopoietin receptor (TpoR) activation, specifically in CALR-mutated cells.
“This study investigates in to the mechanistic oncogenetic aspects of mutant calreticulin, and has potential for therapeutic approaches in the future,” Dr. Gupta said.
The ASH meeting will also feature the final analysis of the MPN-RC 112 consortium trial of pegylated interferon alfa-2a versus hydroxyurea for the treatment of high-risk polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). The researchers will report that the CR rates at 12 and 24 months were similar in patients treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2a and hydroxyurea, but pegylated interferon alfa-2a was associated with a higher rate of serious toxicities.
“There is a continuous debate on optimal first-line cytoreductive therapy for high risk PV/ET, and this is one of the first randomized study to answer this question,” Dr. Gupta said.
The findings will be presented at 7 a.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in Grand Hall D at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (Abstract 577).
AML
For attendees interested in the latest developments in acute myeloid leukemia, Thomas Fischer, MD, of Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg (Germany), highlighted three don’t-miss sessions.
In an analysis of a large cohort of FLT3-ITD mutated AML patients in the RATIFY trial, researchers looked at the prognostic impact of ITD insertion site.
“Interestingly, in this large cohort of 452 FLT3-ITD mutated AML, the negative prognostic impact of beta1-sheet insertion site of FLT3-ITD could be confirmed,” Dr. Fischer said. “Further analysis of a potential predictive effect on outcome of midostaurin treatment is ongoing and will be very interesting.”
The findings will be presented at 5 p.m. PT on Sunday, Dec. 2 in Seaport Ballroom F at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (Abstract 435).
Another notable presentation features results from the phase 2 RADIUS trial, a randomized study comparing standard of care, with and without midostaurin, after allogeneic stem cell transplant in FLT3-ITD–mutated AML.
“Here, efficacy and toxicity of midostaurin was investigated in a [minimal residual disease] situation post-alloSCT,” Dr. Fischer said. “Interestingly, adding midostaurin to standard of care reduced the risk of relapse at 18 months post-alloSCT by 46%.”
The complete findings will be presented at 10:45 a.m. PT on Monday, Dec. 3 in Seaport Ballroom F at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (Abstract 662).
Dr. Fischer singled out another study looking at the efficacy and safety of single-agent quizartinib in patients with FLT3-ITD mutated AML. In this large, randomized trial the researchers noted a significant improvement in CR rates and survival benefit with the single agent FLT3 inhibitors, compared with salvage chemotherapy for patients with relapsed/refractory mutated AML.
The findings will be presented at 8 a.m. on Monday, Dec. 3 in Seaport Ballroom F at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (Abstract 563).
Notable posters
Iberia Romina Sosa, MD, PhD, of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, suggested several posters worth visiting in the areas of thrombosis and bleeding.
Poster 1134 looks at the TNF-alpha driven inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction in the platelet hyperreactivity of aging and MPN.
How do you know if your therapy for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura is working? Poster 3736 examines the measurement of cell-derived microparticles as a possible tool to monitor response to therapy.
You don’t have to be taking aspirin to have a bleeding profile characteristic with consumption of a cyclooxygenase inhibitor. Poster 1156 provides a first report of a platelet function disorder caused by autosomal recessive inheritance of PTGS1.
Poster 2477 takes a closer look at fitusiran, an antithrombin inhibitor, which improves thrombin generation in patients with hemophilia A or B. Protocol amendments for safety monitoring move fitusiran to phase 3 trials, Dr. Sosa said.
Stroke, arterial dissection events reported with Lemtrada, FDA says
Instances of stroke and arterial dissection in the head and neck have been reported in some multiple sclerosis patients soon after an infusion of alemtuzumab (Lemtrada), according to a safety announcement issued by the Food and Drug Administration on Nov. 29.
Since the FDA approved alemtuzumab in 2014 for relapsing forms of MS, 13 cases of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke or arterial dissection have been reported worldwide via the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, but “additional cases we are unaware of may have occurred,” the FDA said in the announcement.
Most of the patients who developed stroke or arterial lining tears showed symptoms within a day of taking the medication, although one patient reported symptoms three days after treatment. The drug is given via intravenous infusion and is generally reserved for patients with relapsing MS who have not responded adequately to other approved MS medications, according to the FDA.
Symptoms include sudden onset of the following: severe headache or neck pain; numbness or weakness in the arms or legs, especially on only one side of the body; confusion or trouble speaking or understanding speech; vision problems in one or both eyes; and dizziness, loss of balance, or difficulty walking.
As a result of the reports, the FDA has updated the drug label prescribing information and the patient Medication Guide to reflect these risks, and added the risk of stroke to the medication’s existing boxed warning.
Health care providers should remind patients of the potential for stroke and arterial dissection at each treatment visit and advise them to seek immediate medical attention if they experience any of the symptoms reported in previous cases. “The diagnosis is often complicated because early symptoms such as headache and neck pain are not specific,” according to the agency, but patients complaining of such symptoms should be evaluated immediately.
Alemtuzumab was also approved in May 2001 for treating B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) under the brand name Campath. The FDA will update the Campath label to reflect the new warnings and risks.
Instances of stroke and arterial dissection in the head and neck have been reported in some multiple sclerosis patients soon after an infusion of alemtuzumab (Lemtrada), according to a safety announcement issued by the Food and Drug Administration on Nov. 29.
Since the FDA approved alemtuzumab in 2014 for relapsing forms of MS, 13 cases of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke or arterial dissection have been reported worldwide via the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, but “additional cases we are unaware of may have occurred,” the FDA said in the announcement.
Most of the patients who developed stroke or arterial lining tears showed symptoms within a day of taking the medication, although one patient reported symptoms three days after treatment. The drug is given via intravenous infusion and is generally reserved for patients with relapsing MS who have not responded adequately to other approved MS medications, according to the FDA.
Symptoms include sudden onset of the following: severe headache or neck pain; numbness or weakness in the arms or legs, especially on only one side of the body; confusion or trouble speaking or understanding speech; vision problems in one or both eyes; and dizziness, loss of balance, or difficulty walking.
As a result of the reports, the FDA has updated the drug label prescribing information and the patient Medication Guide to reflect these risks, and added the risk of stroke to the medication’s existing boxed warning.
Health care providers should remind patients of the potential for stroke and arterial dissection at each treatment visit and advise them to seek immediate medical attention if they experience any of the symptoms reported in previous cases. “The diagnosis is often complicated because early symptoms such as headache and neck pain are not specific,” according to the agency, but patients complaining of such symptoms should be evaluated immediately.
Alemtuzumab was also approved in May 2001 for treating B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) under the brand name Campath. The FDA will update the Campath label to reflect the new warnings and risks.
Instances of stroke and arterial dissection in the head and neck have been reported in some multiple sclerosis patients soon after an infusion of alemtuzumab (Lemtrada), according to a safety announcement issued by the Food and Drug Administration on Nov. 29.
Since the FDA approved alemtuzumab in 2014 for relapsing forms of MS, 13 cases of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke or arterial dissection have been reported worldwide via the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, but “additional cases we are unaware of may have occurred,” the FDA said in the announcement.
Most of the patients who developed stroke or arterial lining tears showed symptoms within a day of taking the medication, although one patient reported symptoms three days after treatment. The drug is given via intravenous infusion and is generally reserved for patients with relapsing MS who have not responded adequately to other approved MS medications, according to the FDA.
Symptoms include sudden onset of the following: severe headache or neck pain; numbness or weakness in the arms or legs, especially on only one side of the body; confusion or trouble speaking or understanding speech; vision problems in one or both eyes; and dizziness, loss of balance, or difficulty walking.
As a result of the reports, the FDA has updated the drug label prescribing information and the patient Medication Guide to reflect these risks, and added the risk of stroke to the medication’s existing boxed warning.
Health care providers should remind patients of the potential for stroke and arterial dissection at each treatment visit and advise them to seek immediate medical attention if they experience any of the symptoms reported in previous cases. “The diagnosis is often complicated because early symptoms such as headache and neck pain are not specific,” according to the agency, but patients complaining of such symptoms should be evaluated immediately.
Alemtuzumab was also approved in May 2001 for treating B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) under the brand name Campath. The FDA will update the Campath label to reflect the new warnings and risks.
Feds call for EHR interoperability. Again.
WASHINGTON – In what feels like a tradition, the need to solve interoperability issues was front and center once again as the key goal presented by Health and Human Services officials at the annual meeting of the Office of the National Coordinator.
“It is actually impossible to move to a future health system, the one that we need ... without a truly interoperable system,” HHS Deputy Secretary Eric Hargan said Nov. 29 during a keynote address.
“Patients need to be able to access their own records. Period,” he added.
Mr. Hargan emphasized that the HHS will define what it wants to see regarding interoperability, but leave it up to vendors and developers to come up with solutions on how this will be accomplished.
One example that he mentioned is Blue Button 2.0, a part of the MyHealthEData initiative, which allows Medicare patients to connect their claims data to apps to help them make informed decisions about their care.
“The use of apps here reflects to potential, we believe, for patient-centered technology to improve health,” Mr. Hargan said.
He also noted that the agency is looking at how existing law and regulation – such as the antikickback statute, the Stark law, HIPAA, and federal privacy regulations – might be hindering the transition to value-based care.
This analysis is “specifically focused on understanding as quickly as we can ... how current interpretations of these laws may be impeding value-based transformation and coordinated care,” Mr. Hargan said.
ONC is also taking a look at reducing provider burden, issuing a draft strategy for comment that specifically targets provider burden related to the use of EHRs and offer up a series of recommendations to help address it.
WASHINGTON – In what feels like a tradition, the need to solve interoperability issues was front and center once again as the key goal presented by Health and Human Services officials at the annual meeting of the Office of the National Coordinator.
“It is actually impossible to move to a future health system, the one that we need ... without a truly interoperable system,” HHS Deputy Secretary Eric Hargan said Nov. 29 during a keynote address.
“Patients need to be able to access their own records. Period,” he added.
Mr. Hargan emphasized that the HHS will define what it wants to see regarding interoperability, but leave it up to vendors and developers to come up with solutions on how this will be accomplished.
One example that he mentioned is Blue Button 2.0, a part of the MyHealthEData initiative, which allows Medicare patients to connect their claims data to apps to help them make informed decisions about their care.
“The use of apps here reflects to potential, we believe, for patient-centered technology to improve health,” Mr. Hargan said.
He also noted that the agency is looking at how existing law and regulation – such as the antikickback statute, the Stark law, HIPAA, and federal privacy regulations – might be hindering the transition to value-based care.
This analysis is “specifically focused on understanding as quickly as we can ... how current interpretations of these laws may be impeding value-based transformation and coordinated care,” Mr. Hargan said.
ONC is also taking a look at reducing provider burden, issuing a draft strategy for comment that specifically targets provider burden related to the use of EHRs and offer up a series of recommendations to help address it.
WASHINGTON – In what feels like a tradition, the need to solve interoperability issues was front and center once again as the key goal presented by Health and Human Services officials at the annual meeting of the Office of the National Coordinator.
“It is actually impossible to move to a future health system, the one that we need ... without a truly interoperable system,” HHS Deputy Secretary Eric Hargan said Nov. 29 during a keynote address.
“Patients need to be able to access their own records. Period,” he added.
Mr. Hargan emphasized that the HHS will define what it wants to see regarding interoperability, but leave it up to vendors and developers to come up with solutions on how this will be accomplished.
One example that he mentioned is Blue Button 2.0, a part of the MyHealthEData initiative, which allows Medicare patients to connect their claims data to apps to help them make informed decisions about their care.
“The use of apps here reflects to potential, we believe, for patient-centered technology to improve health,” Mr. Hargan said.
He also noted that the agency is looking at how existing law and regulation – such as the antikickback statute, the Stark law, HIPAA, and federal privacy regulations – might be hindering the transition to value-based care.
This analysis is “specifically focused on understanding as quickly as we can ... how current interpretations of these laws may be impeding value-based transformation and coordinated care,” Mr. Hargan said.
ONC is also taking a look at reducing provider burden, issuing a draft strategy for comment that specifically targets provider burden related to the use of EHRs and offer up a series of recommendations to help address it.
REPORTING FROM ONC 2018
Death row executions raise questions about competence
AUSTIN, TEX. – More than one-quarter of inmates executed during a recent 7-year period had a history confirming or suggesting they had a mental illness that might have called their competence for execution into question, according to new research.
Capital punishment remains legal in 31 U.S. states. In Ford v. Wainwright, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1986 that executing a person lacking competence violates the Eighth Amendment, yet many people with a history of mental illness have been executed, said Paulina Riess, MD, of the BronxCare Health System in New York, and her colleagues.
The question of appropriately determining whether someone is competent enough to be executed also is controversial, Dr. Riess and her colleagues noted in their research abstract at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. “The decision of whether one is competent ultimately falls into the hands of a forensic evaluator whose opinion should represent a clear and detailed explanation of a prison’s understanding, awareness, and comprehension of the pending execution.”
They also collected data on inmates’ age, race, instant offense, method of execution, and years spent on death row.
When the authors searched the literature for an evidence-based tool to provide “information regarding any history of mental illness pertaining to executed prisoners,” they found none and therefore relied on media coverage for their data on history of mental illness or disability or psychotropic medication treatment.
They found that 26% had a history of psychiatric illness, mental disability, or treatment with psychiatric medications.
Among 273 people executed from 2010-2017, all but 5 were men. Texas had the most executions at 80, followed by Florida (27), Georgia (23), Ohio (22), Oklahoma (21), and Alabama (17). Other states in the analysis included Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, and Virginia.
Five of the inmates were aged older than 70 years, and seven were under 30 years old. Most were aged 31-40 years (73 inmates) or 40-50 years (108 inmates). The racial breakdown was 147 whites, 90 blacks, 35 Hispanics, and 1 Native American.
Lethal injection was the method of execution for all – except one who died by firing squad and two who died by electrocution. Seven inmates had been convicted for mass murder or serial killing (one of whom also had a robbery conviction). The others all had homicide convictions, 61 of whom had at least one other conviction in addition to homicide – predominantly robbery or rape.
Of those with information available, 117 inmates spent 11-20 years on death row, 64 spent 21-30 years, and 15 spent 31-40 years. Only five inmates spent fewer than 5 years on death row, and 49 inmates spent 5-10 years.
The need to rely on media reports for data collection is a limitation of the study. “While gathering demographic information, team members unanimously reported a history of trauma in a large portion of those executed during the 7-year span examined,” the authors reported. “This is another limitation as trauma history could have been included as a separate variable.”
No disclosures were reported.
AUSTIN, TEX. – More than one-quarter of inmates executed during a recent 7-year period had a history confirming or suggesting they had a mental illness that might have called their competence for execution into question, according to new research.
Capital punishment remains legal in 31 U.S. states. In Ford v. Wainwright, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1986 that executing a person lacking competence violates the Eighth Amendment, yet many people with a history of mental illness have been executed, said Paulina Riess, MD, of the BronxCare Health System in New York, and her colleagues.
The question of appropriately determining whether someone is competent enough to be executed also is controversial, Dr. Riess and her colleagues noted in their research abstract at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. “The decision of whether one is competent ultimately falls into the hands of a forensic evaluator whose opinion should represent a clear and detailed explanation of a prison’s understanding, awareness, and comprehension of the pending execution.”
They also collected data on inmates’ age, race, instant offense, method of execution, and years spent on death row.
When the authors searched the literature for an evidence-based tool to provide “information regarding any history of mental illness pertaining to executed prisoners,” they found none and therefore relied on media coverage for their data on history of mental illness or disability or psychotropic medication treatment.
They found that 26% had a history of psychiatric illness, mental disability, or treatment with psychiatric medications.
Among 273 people executed from 2010-2017, all but 5 were men. Texas had the most executions at 80, followed by Florida (27), Georgia (23), Ohio (22), Oklahoma (21), and Alabama (17). Other states in the analysis included Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, and Virginia.
Five of the inmates were aged older than 70 years, and seven were under 30 years old. Most were aged 31-40 years (73 inmates) or 40-50 years (108 inmates). The racial breakdown was 147 whites, 90 blacks, 35 Hispanics, and 1 Native American.
Lethal injection was the method of execution for all – except one who died by firing squad and two who died by electrocution. Seven inmates had been convicted for mass murder or serial killing (one of whom also had a robbery conviction). The others all had homicide convictions, 61 of whom had at least one other conviction in addition to homicide – predominantly robbery or rape.
Of those with information available, 117 inmates spent 11-20 years on death row, 64 spent 21-30 years, and 15 spent 31-40 years. Only five inmates spent fewer than 5 years on death row, and 49 inmates spent 5-10 years.
The need to rely on media reports for data collection is a limitation of the study. “While gathering demographic information, team members unanimously reported a history of trauma in a large portion of those executed during the 7-year span examined,” the authors reported. “This is another limitation as trauma history could have been included as a separate variable.”
No disclosures were reported.
AUSTIN, TEX. – More than one-quarter of inmates executed during a recent 7-year period had a history confirming or suggesting they had a mental illness that might have called their competence for execution into question, according to new research.
Capital punishment remains legal in 31 U.S. states. In Ford v. Wainwright, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1986 that executing a person lacking competence violates the Eighth Amendment, yet many people with a history of mental illness have been executed, said Paulina Riess, MD, of the BronxCare Health System in New York, and her colleagues.
The question of appropriately determining whether someone is competent enough to be executed also is controversial, Dr. Riess and her colleagues noted in their research abstract at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. “The decision of whether one is competent ultimately falls into the hands of a forensic evaluator whose opinion should represent a clear and detailed explanation of a prison’s understanding, awareness, and comprehension of the pending execution.”
They also collected data on inmates’ age, race, instant offense, method of execution, and years spent on death row.
When the authors searched the literature for an evidence-based tool to provide “information regarding any history of mental illness pertaining to executed prisoners,” they found none and therefore relied on media coverage for their data on history of mental illness or disability or psychotropic medication treatment.
They found that 26% had a history of psychiatric illness, mental disability, or treatment with psychiatric medications.
Among 273 people executed from 2010-2017, all but 5 were men. Texas had the most executions at 80, followed by Florida (27), Georgia (23), Ohio (22), Oklahoma (21), and Alabama (17). Other states in the analysis included Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, and Virginia.
Five of the inmates were aged older than 70 years, and seven were under 30 years old. Most were aged 31-40 years (73 inmates) or 40-50 years (108 inmates). The racial breakdown was 147 whites, 90 blacks, 35 Hispanics, and 1 Native American.
Lethal injection was the method of execution for all – except one who died by firing squad and two who died by electrocution. Seven inmates had been convicted for mass murder or serial killing (one of whom also had a robbery conviction). The others all had homicide convictions, 61 of whom had at least one other conviction in addition to homicide – predominantly robbery or rape.
Of those with information available, 117 inmates spent 11-20 years on death row, 64 spent 21-30 years, and 15 spent 31-40 years. Only five inmates spent fewer than 5 years on death row, and 49 inmates spent 5-10 years.
The need to rely on media reports for data collection is a limitation of the study. “While gathering demographic information, team members unanimously reported a history of trauma in a large portion of those executed during the 7-year span examined,” the authors reported. “This is another limitation as trauma history could have been included as a separate variable.”
No disclosures were reported.
REPORTING FROM THE AAPL ANNUAL MEETING
AHA jewels, readmissions not best at ‘Best Hospitals,’ and more
challenge cholesterol guidelines for patients with type 1 diabetes. Also, we take a closer look at how smoke-free policies affect blood pressure, and how magazine-ranked “Best Hospitals” actually perform.
and study findingsSubscribe to Cardiocast wherever you get your podcasts.
Amazon Alexa
Apple Podcasts
challenge cholesterol guidelines for patients with type 1 diabetes. Also, we take a closer look at how smoke-free policies affect blood pressure, and how magazine-ranked “Best Hospitals” actually perform.
and study findingsSubscribe to Cardiocast wherever you get your podcasts.
Amazon Alexa
Apple Podcasts
challenge cholesterol guidelines for patients with type 1 diabetes. Also, we take a closer look at how smoke-free policies affect blood pressure, and how magazine-ranked “Best Hospitals” actually perform.
and study findingsSubscribe to Cardiocast wherever you get your podcasts.
Amazon Alexa
Apple Podcasts
Heart disease remains the leading cause of death in U.S.
The 10 leading causes of death in the United States remained unchanged over the past year, according to a new report from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Though life expectancy at birth decreased to 78.6 years in 2017, down from 78.7 years in 2016, that change was driven primarily by suicide and drug overdose.
However, heart disease remains the leading cause of death in the United States, at 165 deaths per 100,000 individuals in 2017. This represents a slight, statistically nonsignificant, decrease from the 165.5 deaths per 100,000 caused by heart disease in the previous year.
Other diseases related to cardiometabolic health saw increases. Stroke and diabetes each caused a small but significant increase in deaths in 2017, which saw a 1-year increase to 37.6 from 37.3 stroke deaths per 100,000 people. Diabetes deaths increased to 21.5 from 21 per 100,000 the previous year. Stroke was the fifth and diabetes the seventh most common cause of death, according to the data brief published by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).
Alzheimer’s disease deaths also increased significantly, from 30.3 per 100,000 in 2016 to 31 per 100,000 in 2017. Although Alzheimer’s exact etiology remains under study, cardiovascular disease factors and Alzheimer’s disease share many risk factors and are often comorbid .
“With a slight decrease in deaths from heart disease in 2017 and a slight increase in deaths from stroke, this lack of any major movement in these areas has been a trend we’ve seen the last couple of years,” said Ivor Benjamin, MD, president of the American Heart Association, in a press release. “It is discouraging after experiencing decades when heart disease and stroke death rates both dropped more dramatically.”
Infant deaths from congenital malformations decreased from 2016 to 2017, from 122.1 to 118.8 deaths per 100,000 live births. “While the report doesn’t specify death rates for specific types of congenital malformations, this is heartening news as it could reflect fewer deaths from congenital heart defects,” said the AHA in its release.
According to the CDC, the 10 leading causes of death together account for about three quarters of United States deaths. Cancer caused nearly as many deaths as heart disease – 152.5 per 100,000. This represented a significant decrease from the 155.8 cancer deaths per 100,000 seen in 2016. The remaining top 10 causes of death, in decreasing order, were unintentional injuries, chronic lower respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia, kidney disease, and suicide.
The 10 leading causes of death in the United States remained unchanged over the past year, according to a new report from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Though life expectancy at birth decreased to 78.6 years in 2017, down from 78.7 years in 2016, that change was driven primarily by suicide and drug overdose.
However, heart disease remains the leading cause of death in the United States, at 165 deaths per 100,000 individuals in 2017. This represents a slight, statistically nonsignificant, decrease from the 165.5 deaths per 100,000 caused by heart disease in the previous year.
Other diseases related to cardiometabolic health saw increases. Stroke and diabetes each caused a small but significant increase in deaths in 2017, which saw a 1-year increase to 37.6 from 37.3 stroke deaths per 100,000 people. Diabetes deaths increased to 21.5 from 21 per 100,000 the previous year. Stroke was the fifth and diabetes the seventh most common cause of death, according to the data brief published by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).
Alzheimer’s disease deaths also increased significantly, from 30.3 per 100,000 in 2016 to 31 per 100,000 in 2017. Although Alzheimer’s exact etiology remains under study, cardiovascular disease factors and Alzheimer’s disease share many risk factors and are often comorbid .
“With a slight decrease in deaths from heart disease in 2017 and a slight increase in deaths from stroke, this lack of any major movement in these areas has been a trend we’ve seen the last couple of years,” said Ivor Benjamin, MD, president of the American Heart Association, in a press release. “It is discouraging after experiencing decades when heart disease and stroke death rates both dropped more dramatically.”
Infant deaths from congenital malformations decreased from 2016 to 2017, from 122.1 to 118.8 deaths per 100,000 live births. “While the report doesn’t specify death rates for specific types of congenital malformations, this is heartening news as it could reflect fewer deaths from congenital heart defects,” said the AHA in its release.
According to the CDC, the 10 leading causes of death together account for about three quarters of United States deaths. Cancer caused nearly as many deaths as heart disease – 152.5 per 100,000. This represented a significant decrease from the 155.8 cancer deaths per 100,000 seen in 2016. The remaining top 10 causes of death, in decreasing order, were unintentional injuries, chronic lower respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia, kidney disease, and suicide.
The 10 leading causes of death in the United States remained unchanged over the past year, according to a new report from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Though life expectancy at birth decreased to 78.6 years in 2017, down from 78.7 years in 2016, that change was driven primarily by suicide and drug overdose.
However, heart disease remains the leading cause of death in the United States, at 165 deaths per 100,000 individuals in 2017. This represents a slight, statistically nonsignificant, decrease from the 165.5 deaths per 100,000 caused by heart disease in the previous year.
Other diseases related to cardiometabolic health saw increases. Stroke and diabetes each caused a small but significant increase in deaths in 2017, which saw a 1-year increase to 37.6 from 37.3 stroke deaths per 100,000 people. Diabetes deaths increased to 21.5 from 21 per 100,000 the previous year. Stroke was the fifth and diabetes the seventh most common cause of death, according to the data brief published by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).
Alzheimer’s disease deaths also increased significantly, from 30.3 per 100,000 in 2016 to 31 per 100,000 in 2017. Although Alzheimer’s exact etiology remains under study, cardiovascular disease factors and Alzheimer’s disease share many risk factors and are often comorbid .
“With a slight decrease in deaths from heart disease in 2017 and a slight increase in deaths from stroke, this lack of any major movement in these areas has been a trend we’ve seen the last couple of years,” said Ivor Benjamin, MD, president of the American Heart Association, in a press release. “It is discouraging after experiencing decades when heart disease and stroke death rates both dropped more dramatically.”
Infant deaths from congenital malformations decreased from 2016 to 2017, from 122.1 to 118.8 deaths per 100,000 live births. “While the report doesn’t specify death rates for specific types of congenital malformations, this is heartening news as it could reflect fewer deaths from congenital heart defects,” said the AHA in its release.
According to the CDC, the 10 leading causes of death together account for about three quarters of United States deaths. Cancer caused nearly as many deaths as heart disease – 152.5 per 100,000. This represented a significant decrease from the 155.8 cancer deaths per 100,000 seen in 2016. The remaining top 10 causes of death, in decreasing order, were unintentional injuries, chronic lower respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia, kidney disease, and suicide.
FROM A CDC DATA BRIEF