User login
ASCO 2018: Dr. Walter M. Stadler gives his top picks in prostate cancer research
The theme of this year’s annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology is Delivering Discoveries: Expanding the Reach of Precision Medicine. Of the more than 2,500 abstracts accepted for presentation,
• 5000, A randomized, phase 3 trial between adjuvant docetaxel and surveillance after radical radiotherapy for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer: Results of SPCG-13 trial.
• 5002, A randomized study of finite abiraterone acetate (AA) plus leuprolide (LHRHa) versus LHRHa in biochemically recurrent nonmetastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer (M0HNPC).
• 5004, The PROPHECY trial: Multicenter prospective trial of circulating tumor cell (CTC) AR-V7 detection in men with mCRPC receiving abiraterone (A) or enzalutamide (E).
• LBA5005, Overall survival between African American (AA) and Caucasian (C) men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
• 5006, Results of PROSPECT: A randomized, phase 3 trial of PROSTVAC-V/F (PRO) in men with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
• 5007, KEYNOTE-199: Pembrolizumab (pembro) for docetaxel-refractory metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
• 5020, Microsatellite instability in prostate cancer and response to immune checkpoint blockade.
• 5012, Phenotypic and genomic characterization of CTCs as a biomarker for prediction of Veliparib therapy benefit in mCRPC.
• 5022, Radium-223 retreatment in an international, open-label, phase 1/2 study in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases: 2-year follow-up.
• 5032, Association of metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).
• 5040, Lutetium-177 PSMA617 theranostics in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Interim results of a phase 2 trial.
Dr. Walter M. Stadler, is the Fred C. Buffett Professor of Medicine and Surgery; deputy director of the University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center; associate dean for clinical research; chief, section of hematology/oncology; and director, genitourinary oncology program at the University of Chicago.
The theme of this year’s annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology is Delivering Discoveries: Expanding the Reach of Precision Medicine. Of the more than 2,500 abstracts accepted for presentation,
• 5000, A randomized, phase 3 trial between adjuvant docetaxel and surveillance after radical radiotherapy for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer: Results of SPCG-13 trial.
• 5002, A randomized study of finite abiraterone acetate (AA) plus leuprolide (LHRHa) versus LHRHa in biochemically recurrent nonmetastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer (M0HNPC).
• 5004, The PROPHECY trial: Multicenter prospective trial of circulating tumor cell (CTC) AR-V7 detection in men with mCRPC receiving abiraterone (A) or enzalutamide (E).
• LBA5005, Overall survival between African American (AA) and Caucasian (C) men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
• 5006, Results of PROSPECT: A randomized, phase 3 trial of PROSTVAC-V/F (PRO) in men with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
• 5007, KEYNOTE-199: Pembrolizumab (pembro) for docetaxel-refractory metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
• 5020, Microsatellite instability in prostate cancer and response to immune checkpoint blockade.
• 5012, Phenotypic and genomic characterization of CTCs as a biomarker for prediction of Veliparib therapy benefit in mCRPC.
• 5022, Radium-223 retreatment in an international, open-label, phase 1/2 study in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases: 2-year follow-up.
• 5032, Association of metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).
• 5040, Lutetium-177 PSMA617 theranostics in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Interim results of a phase 2 trial.
Dr. Walter M. Stadler, is the Fred C. Buffett Professor of Medicine and Surgery; deputy director of the University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center; associate dean for clinical research; chief, section of hematology/oncology; and director, genitourinary oncology program at the University of Chicago.
The theme of this year’s annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology is Delivering Discoveries: Expanding the Reach of Precision Medicine. Of the more than 2,500 abstracts accepted for presentation,
• 5000, A randomized, phase 3 trial between adjuvant docetaxel and surveillance after radical radiotherapy for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer: Results of SPCG-13 trial.
• 5002, A randomized study of finite abiraterone acetate (AA) plus leuprolide (LHRHa) versus LHRHa in biochemically recurrent nonmetastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer (M0HNPC).
• 5004, The PROPHECY trial: Multicenter prospective trial of circulating tumor cell (CTC) AR-V7 detection in men with mCRPC receiving abiraterone (A) or enzalutamide (E).
• LBA5005, Overall survival between African American (AA) and Caucasian (C) men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
• 5006, Results of PROSPECT: A randomized, phase 3 trial of PROSTVAC-V/F (PRO) in men with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
• 5007, KEYNOTE-199: Pembrolizumab (pembro) for docetaxel-refractory metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
• 5020, Microsatellite instability in prostate cancer and response to immune checkpoint blockade.
• 5012, Phenotypic and genomic characterization of CTCs as a biomarker for prediction of Veliparib therapy benefit in mCRPC.
• 5022, Radium-223 retreatment in an international, open-label, phase 1/2 study in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases: 2-year follow-up.
• 5032, Association of metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).
• 5040, Lutetium-177 PSMA617 theranostics in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Interim results of a phase 2 trial.
Dr. Walter M. Stadler, is the Fred C. Buffett Professor of Medicine and Surgery; deputy director of the University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center; associate dean for clinical research; chief, section of hematology/oncology; and director, genitourinary oncology program at the University of Chicago.
IncobotulinumtoxinA May Reduce Sialorrhea in Parkinson’s Disease
LOS ANGELES—IncobotulinumtoxinA may treat sialorrhea in Parkinson’s disease and other neurologic disorders effectively, according to a trial described at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. The treatment effect may persist for as long as 16 weeks.
Various neurologic disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), may cause troublesome sialorrhea. Olaf Michel, PhD, Vice Chair of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at the University Hospital Brussels, and colleagues conducted a phase III trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA as a treatment for sialorrhea.
The researchers enrolled 184 participants (age 18 to 80) with chronic troublesome sialorrhea resulting from Parkinson’s disease or atypical parkinsonism, stroke, or traumatic brain injury (TBI) into the trial. They randomized participants in a double-blinded fashion to 75 U of incobotulinumtoxinA (ie, the low-dose group), 100 U of incobotulinumtoxinA (ie, the high-dose group), or placebo. The low-dose group received 15 U in each submandibular gland and 22.5, in each parotid gland. The high-dose group received 20 U in each submandibular gland and 30 U in each parotid gland. Follow-up lasted for 16 weeks after injection. The study’s primary outcomes were unstimulated salivary flow rate (uSFR) at week four, compared with baseline, and Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS) at week four.
In all, 74 participants were randomized to the low dose, 74 to the high dose, and 36 to placebo. The three groups were well balanced, but the proportion of women in the placebo group was lower than that in the treatment groups. Sialorrhea was associated with Parkinson’s disease in 70.6% of patients, atypical Parkinson syndromes in 8.7%, stroke in 17.9%, and TBI in 2.7%.
The investigators localized injection sites using anatomical landmarks in 39.2% of the low-dose group, 44.6% of the high-dose group, and 50% of the placebo group. They used ultrasound guidance to localize injection sites in 60.8% of the low-dose group, 55.4% of the high-dose group, and 50% of the placebo group.
At week four, changes in uSFR and GICS were similar in the placebo and low-dose groups. Improvements in these measures reached statistical significance in the high-dose group at week four, however. At weeks eight through 12, the improvements in uSFR and GICS in both active treatment groups were significant. Improvements in the uSFR and GICS in both dose groups were maintained at week 16, but were lower in the low-dose group than in the high-dose group. Dr. Michel and colleagues observed no relevant differences in outcomes according to the technique used to localize injection sites. They also observed no unexpected side effects.
At the end of the 16-week study, all patients entered a 48-week extension period during which they received three additional injections of dose-blinded incobotulinumtoxinA at 16-week intervals. The treatment effect stabilized and did not decline during the extension, and the investigators observed no accumulation of adverse events.
LOS ANGELES—IncobotulinumtoxinA may treat sialorrhea in Parkinson’s disease and other neurologic disorders effectively, according to a trial described at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. The treatment effect may persist for as long as 16 weeks.
Various neurologic disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), may cause troublesome sialorrhea. Olaf Michel, PhD, Vice Chair of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at the University Hospital Brussels, and colleagues conducted a phase III trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA as a treatment for sialorrhea.
The researchers enrolled 184 participants (age 18 to 80) with chronic troublesome sialorrhea resulting from Parkinson’s disease or atypical parkinsonism, stroke, or traumatic brain injury (TBI) into the trial. They randomized participants in a double-blinded fashion to 75 U of incobotulinumtoxinA (ie, the low-dose group), 100 U of incobotulinumtoxinA (ie, the high-dose group), or placebo. The low-dose group received 15 U in each submandibular gland and 22.5, in each parotid gland. The high-dose group received 20 U in each submandibular gland and 30 U in each parotid gland. Follow-up lasted for 16 weeks after injection. The study’s primary outcomes were unstimulated salivary flow rate (uSFR) at week four, compared with baseline, and Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS) at week four.
In all, 74 participants were randomized to the low dose, 74 to the high dose, and 36 to placebo. The three groups were well balanced, but the proportion of women in the placebo group was lower than that in the treatment groups. Sialorrhea was associated with Parkinson’s disease in 70.6% of patients, atypical Parkinson syndromes in 8.7%, stroke in 17.9%, and TBI in 2.7%.
The investigators localized injection sites using anatomical landmarks in 39.2% of the low-dose group, 44.6% of the high-dose group, and 50% of the placebo group. They used ultrasound guidance to localize injection sites in 60.8% of the low-dose group, 55.4% of the high-dose group, and 50% of the placebo group.
At week four, changes in uSFR and GICS were similar in the placebo and low-dose groups. Improvements in these measures reached statistical significance in the high-dose group at week four, however. At weeks eight through 12, the improvements in uSFR and GICS in both active treatment groups were significant. Improvements in the uSFR and GICS in both dose groups were maintained at week 16, but were lower in the low-dose group than in the high-dose group. Dr. Michel and colleagues observed no relevant differences in outcomes according to the technique used to localize injection sites. They also observed no unexpected side effects.
At the end of the 16-week study, all patients entered a 48-week extension period during which they received three additional injections of dose-blinded incobotulinumtoxinA at 16-week intervals. The treatment effect stabilized and did not decline during the extension, and the investigators observed no accumulation of adverse events.
LOS ANGELES—IncobotulinumtoxinA may treat sialorrhea in Parkinson’s disease and other neurologic disorders effectively, according to a trial described at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. The treatment effect may persist for as long as 16 weeks.
Various neurologic disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), may cause troublesome sialorrhea. Olaf Michel, PhD, Vice Chair of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at the University Hospital Brussels, and colleagues conducted a phase III trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA as a treatment for sialorrhea.
The researchers enrolled 184 participants (age 18 to 80) with chronic troublesome sialorrhea resulting from Parkinson’s disease or atypical parkinsonism, stroke, or traumatic brain injury (TBI) into the trial. They randomized participants in a double-blinded fashion to 75 U of incobotulinumtoxinA (ie, the low-dose group), 100 U of incobotulinumtoxinA (ie, the high-dose group), or placebo. The low-dose group received 15 U in each submandibular gland and 22.5, in each parotid gland. The high-dose group received 20 U in each submandibular gland and 30 U in each parotid gland. Follow-up lasted for 16 weeks after injection. The study’s primary outcomes were unstimulated salivary flow rate (uSFR) at week four, compared with baseline, and Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS) at week four.
In all, 74 participants were randomized to the low dose, 74 to the high dose, and 36 to placebo. The three groups were well balanced, but the proportion of women in the placebo group was lower than that in the treatment groups. Sialorrhea was associated with Parkinson’s disease in 70.6% of patients, atypical Parkinson syndromes in 8.7%, stroke in 17.9%, and TBI in 2.7%.
The investigators localized injection sites using anatomical landmarks in 39.2% of the low-dose group, 44.6% of the high-dose group, and 50% of the placebo group. They used ultrasound guidance to localize injection sites in 60.8% of the low-dose group, 55.4% of the high-dose group, and 50% of the placebo group.
At week four, changes in uSFR and GICS were similar in the placebo and low-dose groups. Improvements in these measures reached statistical significance in the high-dose group at week four, however. At weeks eight through 12, the improvements in uSFR and GICS in both active treatment groups were significant. Improvements in the uSFR and GICS in both dose groups were maintained at week 16, but were lower in the low-dose group than in the high-dose group. Dr. Michel and colleagues observed no relevant differences in outcomes according to the technique used to localize injection sites. They also observed no unexpected side effects.
At the end of the 16-week study, all patients entered a 48-week extension period during which they received three additional injections of dose-blinded incobotulinumtoxinA at 16-week intervals. The treatment effect stabilized and did not decline during the extension, and the investigators observed no accumulation of adverse events.
Retinal Changes Indicate Parkinson’s Disease Pathology Severity
The accumulation of phosphorylated α-synuclein in the retina may serve as a biomarker of brain pathology severity and aid in diagnosis and monitoring of Parkinson’s disease, according to data published online ahead of print May 8 in Movement Disorders.
“These data suggest that phosphorylated α-synuclein accumulates in the retina in parallel with that in the brain, including in early stages preceding development of clinical signs of parkinsonism or dementia,” said Nicolás Cuenca, PhD, Assistant Professor of Physiology, Genetics, and Microbiology at the University of Alicante in Spain, and colleagues.
Parkinson’s disease pathology is mainly characterized by the accumulation of pathologic α-synuclein deposits in the brain, but little is known about how synucleinopathy affects the retina.
Dr. Cuenca and colleagues used immunohistochemistry to evaluate the presence of phosphorylated α-synuclein deposits in the retina of nine autopsied subjects with Parkinson’s disease, four with incidental Lewy body disease, and six controls. Eligible subjects had motor parkinsonism, Lewy body pathology, and pigmented neuron loss in the substantia nigra at autopsy. For each subject, the researchers compared the amount of retinal synucleinopathy with indicators of brain disease severity.
All subjects with Parkinson’s disease and three subjects with incidental Lewy body disease had phosphorylated α-synuclein deposits in ganglion cell perikarya, dendrites, and axons. Some of the deposits resembled brain Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites. Cells that contained phosphorylated α-synuclein had different morphologies, soma sizes (ie, from 15 µm to 30 µm), dendritic lengths (ie, from 570 µm to 1,620 µm), and receptive fields. Control subjects did not show any phosphorylated α-synuclein immunoreactivity in their retinas, however.
The Lewy-type synucleinopathy density in the retina significantly correlated with Lewy-type synucleinopathy density in the brain, with the Unified Parkinson’s disease pathology stage, and with the motor subscale of the Unifed Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. Confirmation of disease by autopsy partly compensated for the small number of subjects, according to the authors.
“Further investigations of the eye in Parkinson’s disease are desirable, given that ocular structures are involved in the pathology of several neurodegenerative diseases,” said Dr. Cuenca and colleagues.
—Erica Tricarico
Suggested Reading
Ortuño-Lizarán I, Beach TG, Serrano GE, et al. Phosphorylated α-synuclein in the retina is a biomarker of Parkinson’s disease pathology severity. Mov Disord. 2018 May 8 [Epub ahead of print].
Ma LJ, Xu LL, Mao CJ, et al. Progressive changes in the retinal structure of patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2018;8(1):85-92.
The accumulation of phosphorylated α-synuclein in the retina may serve as a biomarker of brain pathology severity and aid in diagnosis and monitoring of Parkinson’s disease, according to data published online ahead of print May 8 in Movement Disorders.
“These data suggest that phosphorylated α-synuclein accumulates in the retina in parallel with that in the brain, including in early stages preceding development of clinical signs of parkinsonism or dementia,” said Nicolás Cuenca, PhD, Assistant Professor of Physiology, Genetics, and Microbiology at the University of Alicante in Spain, and colleagues.
Parkinson’s disease pathology is mainly characterized by the accumulation of pathologic α-synuclein deposits in the brain, but little is known about how synucleinopathy affects the retina.
Dr. Cuenca and colleagues used immunohistochemistry to evaluate the presence of phosphorylated α-synuclein deposits in the retina of nine autopsied subjects with Parkinson’s disease, four with incidental Lewy body disease, and six controls. Eligible subjects had motor parkinsonism, Lewy body pathology, and pigmented neuron loss in the substantia nigra at autopsy. For each subject, the researchers compared the amount of retinal synucleinopathy with indicators of brain disease severity.
All subjects with Parkinson’s disease and three subjects with incidental Lewy body disease had phosphorylated α-synuclein deposits in ganglion cell perikarya, dendrites, and axons. Some of the deposits resembled brain Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites. Cells that contained phosphorylated α-synuclein had different morphologies, soma sizes (ie, from 15 µm to 30 µm), dendritic lengths (ie, from 570 µm to 1,620 µm), and receptive fields. Control subjects did not show any phosphorylated α-synuclein immunoreactivity in their retinas, however.
The Lewy-type synucleinopathy density in the retina significantly correlated with Lewy-type synucleinopathy density in the brain, with the Unified Parkinson’s disease pathology stage, and with the motor subscale of the Unifed Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. Confirmation of disease by autopsy partly compensated for the small number of subjects, according to the authors.
“Further investigations of the eye in Parkinson’s disease are desirable, given that ocular structures are involved in the pathology of several neurodegenerative diseases,” said Dr. Cuenca and colleagues.
—Erica Tricarico
Suggested Reading
Ortuño-Lizarán I, Beach TG, Serrano GE, et al. Phosphorylated α-synuclein in the retina is a biomarker of Parkinson’s disease pathology severity. Mov Disord. 2018 May 8 [Epub ahead of print].
Ma LJ, Xu LL, Mao CJ, et al. Progressive changes in the retinal structure of patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2018;8(1):85-92.
The accumulation of phosphorylated α-synuclein in the retina may serve as a biomarker of brain pathology severity and aid in diagnosis and monitoring of Parkinson’s disease, according to data published online ahead of print May 8 in Movement Disorders.
“These data suggest that phosphorylated α-synuclein accumulates in the retina in parallel with that in the brain, including in early stages preceding development of clinical signs of parkinsonism or dementia,” said Nicolás Cuenca, PhD, Assistant Professor of Physiology, Genetics, and Microbiology at the University of Alicante in Spain, and colleagues.
Parkinson’s disease pathology is mainly characterized by the accumulation of pathologic α-synuclein deposits in the brain, but little is known about how synucleinopathy affects the retina.
Dr. Cuenca and colleagues used immunohistochemistry to evaluate the presence of phosphorylated α-synuclein deposits in the retina of nine autopsied subjects with Parkinson’s disease, four with incidental Lewy body disease, and six controls. Eligible subjects had motor parkinsonism, Lewy body pathology, and pigmented neuron loss in the substantia nigra at autopsy. For each subject, the researchers compared the amount of retinal synucleinopathy with indicators of brain disease severity.
All subjects with Parkinson’s disease and three subjects with incidental Lewy body disease had phosphorylated α-synuclein deposits in ganglion cell perikarya, dendrites, and axons. Some of the deposits resembled brain Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites. Cells that contained phosphorylated α-synuclein had different morphologies, soma sizes (ie, from 15 µm to 30 µm), dendritic lengths (ie, from 570 µm to 1,620 µm), and receptive fields. Control subjects did not show any phosphorylated α-synuclein immunoreactivity in their retinas, however.
The Lewy-type synucleinopathy density in the retina significantly correlated with Lewy-type synucleinopathy density in the brain, with the Unified Parkinson’s disease pathology stage, and with the motor subscale of the Unifed Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. Confirmation of disease by autopsy partly compensated for the small number of subjects, according to the authors.
“Further investigations of the eye in Parkinson’s disease are desirable, given that ocular structures are involved in the pathology of several neurodegenerative diseases,” said Dr. Cuenca and colleagues.
—Erica Tricarico
Suggested Reading
Ortuño-Lizarán I, Beach TG, Serrano GE, et al. Phosphorylated α-synuclein in the retina is a biomarker of Parkinson’s disease pathology severity. Mov Disord. 2018 May 8 [Epub ahead of print].
Ma LJ, Xu LL, Mao CJ, et al. Progressive changes in the retinal structure of patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2018;8(1):85-92.
How Common Are Comorbidities in Chronic Versus Episodic Migraine?
LOS ANGELES—Significantly more patients with chronic migraine versus episodic migraine report cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, psychiatric, and sleep-related symptoms and conditions, according to research presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
Certain comorbidities, including allergies, insomnia, and neck pain, have relative frequencies in chronic migraine that are at least 10% greater than in episodic migraine. “Mechanisms explaining this association might include direct causality (eg, chronic migraine causes the comorbidity), reverse causality (eg, the condition increases chronic migraine risk), and shared genetic or environmental risk factors,” said Richard B. Lipton, MD, Edwin S. Lowe Chair in Neurology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, and colleagues. Detection bias also may contribute to the association, they said.
Examining Relative Frequencies
Migraineurs often present with concomitant conditions that may exacerbate the disease, and many comorbidities occur more frequently in chronic migraine than in episodic migraine. To replicate and extend research on comorbid medical conditions in a systematically recruited sample of people with episodic and chronic migraine, Dr. Lipton and colleagues analyzed data from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study, a prospective web-based survey designed to characterize self-reported headache symptoms and severity in a representative sample of people with migraine in the United States.
The CaMEO study included a comorbidities-and-endophenotypes module that asked respondents whether they ever had specific symptoms or conditions and, if present, whether they had been confirmed or diagnosed by a doctor. The investigators analyzed self-reported data for symptoms easily identified by respondents and physician-diagnosed data for conditions that required a medical diagnosis. The researchers used chi-squared analysis to compare the relative frequencies of symptoms and conditions. Percentages for female-specific conditions (eg, polycystic ovary syndrome) were calculated by comparison with female migraineurs. Dr. Lipton and colleagues presented data about respiratory, sleep disorder, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal comorbidities in one study and data about pain, psychiatric, and endocrine or neurologic comorbidities in another study.
In all, 16,763 CaMEO respondents with migraine received the comorbidities-and-endophenotypes module, and 12,810 provided valid responses. The analysis included 1,111 respondents (8.7%) with chronic migraine (ie, 15 or more headache days per month for more than three months) and 11,699 (91.3%) with episodic migraine (ie, fewer than 15 headache days per month). Compared with the episodic migraine group, the chronic migraine group had a similar mean age (41.3 vs 41.9), was more likely to be female (74.2% vs 81.5%), was more likely to be white (84.0% vs 88.7%), and had a higher mean BMI (27.7 kg/m2 vs 28.7 kg/m2). Compared with respondents with episodic migraine, respondents with chronic migraine more frequently reported allodynia, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depression and had a greater mean Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) score.
A Range of Symptoms and Conditions
Of the 31 respiratory, sleep disorder, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal comorbidities assessed, the relative frequencies were significantly higher in chronic migraine for 93.5%. The following five conditions or groups of conditions had relative frequencies at least 10% higher in chronic migraine than episodic migraine: allergies, hay fever, or allergic rhinitis (61.2% vs 51.2%); sinusitis or sinus infection (63.5% vs 52.7%); insomnia (50.2% vs 35.6%); vertigo, dizziness, or balance problems (29.7% vs 17.8%); and gastroesophageal reflux disease (24.4% vs 14.3%).
Of the 28 pain, psychiatric, and endocrine or neurologic comorbidities assessed, the relative frequencies were significantly higher in chronic migraine for 85.7%. The following five conditions had relative frequencies more than 10% higher in chronic migraine than in episodic migraine: chronic back pain (37.6% vs 22.5%), chronic pain (22.2% vs 7.4%), neck pain (55.3% vs 38.1%), anxiety (42.2% vs 25.7%), and depression (45.6% vs 28.1%).
The Likelihood of Medication Overuse
Of the eight endocrine or neurologic comorbidities assessed (ie, hyperhidrosis, diabetes, seizures, spasticity, underactive thyroid or thyroid medication, cervical dystonia, gout, and polycystic ovary syndrome), all but gout and polycystic ovary syndrome had significantly higher relative frequencies in chronic migraine.
When the researchers used latent class analysis to identify natural subgroups of migraine based on profiles of comorbidities and concomitant conditions, they found that a subgroup with the most comorbidities was more likely to include individuals with chronic migraine (23.1% vs 4.8%) and had greater proportions of individuals with grade IV MIDAS scores (ie, severe disability; 48.1% vs 15.1%), allodynia (67.6% vs 38.3%), medication overuse (36.4% vs 8.9%), and aura (40.1% vs 23.9%), compared with a subgroup with the fewest comorbidities
The studies were funded by Allergan.
—Jake Remaly
Suggested Reading
Adams AM, Serrano D, Buse DC, et al. The impact of chronic migraine: The Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study methods and baseline results. Cephalalgia. 2015;35(7):563-578.
LOS ANGELES—Significantly more patients with chronic migraine versus episodic migraine report cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, psychiatric, and sleep-related symptoms and conditions, according to research presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
Certain comorbidities, including allergies, insomnia, and neck pain, have relative frequencies in chronic migraine that are at least 10% greater than in episodic migraine. “Mechanisms explaining this association might include direct causality (eg, chronic migraine causes the comorbidity), reverse causality (eg, the condition increases chronic migraine risk), and shared genetic or environmental risk factors,” said Richard B. Lipton, MD, Edwin S. Lowe Chair in Neurology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, and colleagues. Detection bias also may contribute to the association, they said.
Examining Relative Frequencies
Migraineurs often present with concomitant conditions that may exacerbate the disease, and many comorbidities occur more frequently in chronic migraine than in episodic migraine. To replicate and extend research on comorbid medical conditions in a systematically recruited sample of people with episodic and chronic migraine, Dr. Lipton and colleagues analyzed data from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study, a prospective web-based survey designed to characterize self-reported headache symptoms and severity in a representative sample of people with migraine in the United States.
The CaMEO study included a comorbidities-and-endophenotypes module that asked respondents whether they ever had specific symptoms or conditions and, if present, whether they had been confirmed or diagnosed by a doctor. The investigators analyzed self-reported data for symptoms easily identified by respondents and physician-diagnosed data for conditions that required a medical diagnosis. The researchers used chi-squared analysis to compare the relative frequencies of symptoms and conditions. Percentages for female-specific conditions (eg, polycystic ovary syndrome) were calculated by comparison with female migraineurs. Dr. Lipton and colleagues presented data about respiratory, sleep disorder, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal comorbidities in one study and data about pain, psychiatric, and endocrine or neurologic comorbidities in another study.
In all, 16,763 CaMEO respondents with migraine received the comorbidities-and-endophenotypes module, and 12,810 provided valid responses. The analysis included 1,111 respondents (8.7%) with chronic migraine (ie, 15 or more headache days per month for more than three months) and 11,699 (91.3%) with episodic migraine (ie, fewer than 15 headache days per month). Compared with the episodic migraine group, the chronic migraine group had a similar mean age (41.3 vs 41.9), was more likely to be female (74.2% vs 81.5%), was more likely to be white (84.0% vs 88.7%), and had a higher mean BMI (27.7 kg/m2 vs 28.7 kg/m2). Compared with respondents with episodic migraine, respondents with chronic migraine more frequently reported allodynia, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depression and had a greater mean Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) score.
A Range of Symptoms and Conditions
Of the 31 respiratory, sleep disorder, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal comorbidities assessed, the relative frequencies were significantly higher in chronic migraine for 93.5%. The following five conditions or groups of conditions had relative frequencies at least 10% higher in chronic migraine than episodic migraine: allergies, hay fever, or allergic rhinitis (61.2% vs 51.2%); sinusitis or sinus infection (63.5% vs 52.7%); insomnia (50.2% vs 35.6%); vertigo, dizziness, or balance problems (29.7% vs 17.8%); and gastroesophageal reflux disease (24.4% vs 14.3%).
Of the 28 pain, psychiatric, and endocrine or neurologic comorbidities assessed, the relative frequencies were significantly higher in chronic migraine for 85.7%. The following five conditions had relative frequencies more than 10% higher in chronic migraine than in episodic migraine: chronic back pain (37.6% vs 22.5%), chronic pain (22.2% vs 7.4%), neck pain (55.3% vs 38.1%), anxiety (42.2% vs 25.7%), and depression (45.6% vs 28.1%).
The Likelihood of Medication Overuse
Of the eight endocrine or neurologic comorbidities assessed (ie, hyperhidrosis, diabetes, seizures, spasticity, underactive thyroid or thyroid medication, cervical dystonia, gout, and polycystic ovary syndrome), all but gout and polycystic ovary syndrome had significantly higher relative frequencies in chronic migraine.
When the researchers used latent class analysis to identify natural subgroups of migraine based on profiles of comorbidities and concomitant conditions, they found that a subgroup with the most comorbidities was more likely to include individuals with chronic migraine (23.1% vs 4.8%) and had greater proportions of individuals with grade IV MIDAS scores (ie, severe disability; 48.1% vs 15.1%), allodynia (67.6% vs 38.3%), medication overuse (36.4% vs 8.9%), and aura (40.1% vs 23.9%), compared with a subgroup with the fewest comorbidities
The studies were funded by Allergan.
—Jake Remaly
Suggested Reading
Adams AM, Serrano D, Buse DC, et al. The impact of chronic migraine: The Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study methods and baseline results. Cephalalgia. 2015;35(7):563-578.
LOS ANGELES—Significantly more patients with chronic migraine versus episodic migraine report cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, psychiatric, and sleep-related symptoms and conditions, according to research presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
Certain comorbidities, including allergies, insomnia, and neck pain, have relative frequencies in chronic migraine that are at least 10% greater than in episodic migraine. “Mechanisms explaining this association might include direct causality (eg, chronic migraine causes the comorbidity), reverse causality (eg, the condition increases chronic migraine risk), and shared genetic or environmental risk factors,” said Richard B. Lipton, MD, Edwin S. Lowe Chair in Neurology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, and colleagues. Detection bias also may contribute to the association, they said.
Examining Relative Frequencies
Migraineurs often present with concomitant conditions that may exacerbate the disease, and many comorbidities occur more frequently in chronic migraine than in episodic migraine. To replicate and extend research on comorbid medical conditions in a systematically recruited sample of people with episodic and chronic migraine, Dr. Lipton and colleagues analyzed data from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study, a prospective web-based survey designed to characterize self-reported headache symptoms and severity in a representative sample of people with migraine in the United States.
The CaMEO study included a comorbidities-and-endophenotypes module that asked respondents whether they ever had specific symptoms or conditions and, if present, whether they had been confirmed or diagnosed by a doctor. The investigators analyzed self-reported data for symptoms easily identified by respondents and physician-diagnosed data for conditions that required a medical diagnosis. The researchers used chi-squared analysis to compare the relative frequencies of symptoms and conditions. Percentages for female-specific conditions (eg, polycystic ovary syndrome) were calculated by comparison with female migraineurs. Dr. Lipton and colleagues presented data about respiratory, sleep disorder, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal comorbidities in one study and data about pain, psychiatric, and endocrine or neurologic comorbidities in another study.
In all, 16,763 CaMEO respondents with migraine received the comorbidities-and-endophenotypes module, and 12,810 provided valid responses. The analysis included 1,111 respondents (8.7%) with chronic migraine (ie, 15 or more headache days per month for more than three months) and 11,699 (91.3%) with episodic migraine (ie, fewer than 15 headache days per month). Compared with the episodic migraine group, the chronic migraine group had a similar mean age (41.3 vs 41.9), was more likely to be female (74.2% vs 81.5%), was more likely to be white (84.0% vs 88.7%), and had a higher mean BMI (27.7 kg/m2 vs 28.7 kg/m2). Compared with respondents with episodic migraine, respondents with chronic migraine more frequently reported allodynia, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depression and had a greater mean Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) score.
A Range of Symptoms and Conditions
Of the 31 respiratory, sleep disorder, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal comorbidities assessed, the relative frequencies were significantly higher in chronic migraine for 93.5%. The following five conditions or groups of conditions had relative frequencies at least 10% higher in chronic migraine than episodic migraine: allergies, hay fever, or allergic rhinitis (61.2% vs 51.2%); sinusitis or sinus infection (63.5% vs 52.7%); insomnia (50.2% vs 35.6%); vertigo, dizziness, or balance problems (29.7% vs 17.8%); and gastroesophageal reflux disease (24.4% vs 14.3%).
Of the 28 pain, psychiatric, and endocrine or neurologic comorbidities assessed, the relative frequencies were significantly higher in chronic migraine for 85.7%. The following five conditions had relative frequencies more than 10% higher in chronic migraine than in episodic migraine: chronic back pain (37.6% vs 22.5%), chronic pain (22.2% vs 7.4%), neck pain (55.3% vs 38.1%), anxiety (42.2% vs 25.7%), and depression (45.6% vs 28.1%).
The Likelihood of Medication Overuse
Of the eight endocrine or neurologic comorbidities assessed (ie, hyperhidrosis, diabetes, seizures, spasticity, underactive thyroid or thyroid medication, cervical dystonia, gout, and polycystic ovary syndrome), all but gout and polycystic ovary syndrome had significantly higher relative frequencies in chronic migraine.
When the researchers used latent class analysis to identify natural subgroups of migraine based on profiles of comorbidities and concomitant conditions, they found that a subgroup with the most comorbidities was more likely to include individuals with chronic migraine (23.1% vs 4.8%) and had greater proportions of individuals with grade IV MIDAS scores (ie, severe disability; 48.1% vs 15.1%), allodynia (67.6% vs 38.3%), medication overuse (36.4% vs 8.9%), and aura (40.1% vs 23.9%), compared with a subgroup with the fewest comorbidities
The studies were funded by Allergan.
—Jake Remaly
Suggested Reading
Adams AM, Serrano D, Buse DC, et al. The impact of chronic migraine: The Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study methods and baseline results. Cephalalgia. 2015;35(7):563-578.
Interim Results Show Efficacy for a Novel MS Drug
LOS ANGELES—Preliminary results for annualized relapse rate and MRI parameters support ALKS 8700 (also known as BIIB098) as an oral treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), said Richard A. Leigh-Pemberton, MD, and colleagues, who presented interim phase III findings at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. Dr. Leigh-Pemberton is Senior Medical Director at Alkermes in Waltham, Massachusetts.
ALKS 8700 is a prodrug of monomethyl fumarate, which is the active metabolite of dimethyl fumarate. It is being developed as an oral disease-modifying therapy for relapsing forms of MS and is designed to treat the disease in a manner similar to that of dimethyl fumarate, but with the potential for improved gastrointestinal tolerability. Two phase III studies are ongoing—EVOLVE-MS-1, an open-label study evaluating the long-term safety and tolerability of ALKS 8700 (462 mg twice daily) over 96 weeks, and EVOLVE-MS-2, a five-week, randomized, double-blind study evaluating the gastrointestinal tolerability of ALKS 8700 (462 mg twice daily) and dimethyl fumarate (240 mg twice daily).
Interim exploratory results on relapse rates and one-year MRI end points from the ongoing EVOLVE-MS-1 study were reported.
Approximately 900 patients will be enrolled in EVOLVE-MS-1. Main inclusion criteria include patients ages 18 to 65 with a confirmed diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS according to the 2010 revised McDonald criteria, an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 6 or lower, and no evidence of relapse within 30 days prior to starting the study drug. Main exclusion criteria include a diagnosis of progressive forms of MS, pregnancy or breastfeeding, history of other clinically significant medical condition, any clinically significant abnormal laboratory test at screening, and an absolute lymphocyte count less than 0.9 × 103/µL.
As of the January 12, 2018, data cutoff for this interim analysis, 528 de novo patients (those who had not participated in any prior study of ALKS 8700) had enrolled in EVOLVE-MS-1, and 374 had completed a one-year MRI assessment. Mean age was approximately 41, and about 70% were female. Median follow-up was 0.93 patient years for the de novo patients, and annualized relapse
This study was sponsored by Alkermes and Biogen.
—Glenn S. Williams
LOS ANGELES—Preliminary results for annualized relapse rate and MRI parameters support ALKS 8700 (also known as BIIB098) as an oral treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), said Richard A. Leigh-Pemberton, MD, and colleagues, who presented interim phase III findings at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. Dr. Leigh-Pemberton is Senior Medical Director at Alkermes in Waltham, Massachusetts.
ALKS 8700 is a prodrug of monomethyl fumarate, which is the active metabolite of dimethyl fumarate. It is being developed as an oral disease-modifying therapy for relapsing forms of MS and is designed to treat the disease in a manner similar to that of dimethyl fumarate, but with the potential for improved gastrointestinal tolerability. Two phase III studies are ongoing—EVOLVE-MS-1, an open-label study evaluating the long-term safety and tolerability of ALKS 8700 (462 mg twice daily) over 96 weeks, and EVOLVE-MS-2, a five-week, randomized, double-blind study evaluating the gastrointestinal tolerability of ALKS 8700 (462 mg twice daily) and dimethyl fumarate (240 mg twice daily).
Interim exploratory results on relapse rates and one-year MRI end points from the ongoing EVOLVE-MS-1 study were reported.
Approximately 900 patients will be enrolled in EVOLVE-MS-1. Main inclusion criteria include patients ages 18 to 65 with a confirmed diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS according to the 2010 revised McDonald criteria, an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 6 or lower, and no evidence of relapse within 30 days prior to starting the study drug. Main exclusion criteria include a diagnosis of progressive forms of MS, pregnancy or breastfeeding, history of other clinically significant medical condition, any clinically significant abnormal laboratory test at screening, and an absolute lymphocyte count less than 0.9 × 103/µL.
As of the January 12, 2018, data cutoff for this interim analysis, 528 de novo patients (those who had not participated in any prior study of ALKS 8700) had enrolled in EVOLVE-MS-1, and 374 had completed a one-year MRI assessment. Mean age was approximately 41, and about 70% were female. Median follow-up was 0.93 patient years for the de novo patients, and annualized relapse
This study was sponsored by Alkermes and Biogen.
—Glenn S. Williams
LOS ANGELES—Preliminary results for annualized relapse rate and MRI parameters support ALKS 8700 (also known as BIIB098) as an oral treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), said Richard A. Leigh-Pemberton, MD, and colleagues, who presented interim phase III findings at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. Dr. Leigh-Pemberton is Senior Medical Director at Alkermes in Waltham, Massachusetts.
ALKS 8700 is a prodrug of monomethyl fumarate, which is the active metabolite of dimethyl fumarate. It is being developed as an oral disease-modifying therapy for relapsing forms of MS and is designed to treat the disease in a manner similar to that of dimethyl fumarate, but with the potential for improved gastrointestinal tolerability. Two phase III studies are ongoing—EVOLVE-MS-1, an open-label study evaluating the long-term safety and tolerability of ALKS 8700 (462 mg twice daily) over 96 weeks, and EVOLVE-MS-2, a five-week, randomized, double-blind study evaluating the gastrointestinal tolerability of ALKS 8700 (462 mg twice daily) and dimethyl fumarate (240 mg twice daily).
Interim exploratory results on relapse rates and one-year MRI end points from the ongoing EVOLVE-MS-1 study were reported.
Approximately 900 patients will be enrolled in EVOLVE-MS-1. Main inclusion criteria include patients ages 18 to 65 with a confirmed diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS according to the 2010 revised McDonald criteria, an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 6 or lower, and no evidence of relapse within 30 days prior to starting the study drug. Main exclusion criteria include a diagnosis of progressive forms of MS, pregnancy or breastfeeding, history of other clinically significant medical condition, any clinically significant abnormal laboratory test at screening, and an absolute lymphocyte count less than 0.9 × 103/µL.
As of the January 12, 2018, data cutoff for this interim analysis, 528 de novo patients (those who had not participated in any prior study of ALKS 8700) had enrolled in EVOLVE-MS-1, and 374 had completed a one-year MRI assessment. Mean age was approximately 41, and about 70% were female. Median follow-up was 0.93 patient years for the de novo patients, and annualized relapse
This study was sponsored by Alkermes and Biogen.
—Glenn S. Williams
Product Update: FUJIFILM; Freemie, Preventeza, and C-Panty
NEW VISUALIZATION SYSTEMS FROM FUJIFILM
FUJIFILM New Development, USA, has introduced 2 visualization systems for minimally invasive surgery. Using proprietary technology, the Ultra-Slim Video Laparoscope System (EL-580FN) delivers enhanced image resolution, color fidelity, and display quality, says FUJIFILM. The product features include “Chip on the Tip” high-definition digital imaging processing, less fogging, autoclave sterilization reprocessing, and a low profile, lightweight ergonomic handle. The 3.8-mm-diameter distal end was designed to improve workflow, reduce physician fatigue, and potentially reduce the size of incisions. The accompanying Digital Video Processor System is used for endoscopic procedures with automatic light control, an anti-blur function for motion images, and digital zoom.
FUJIFILM reports that the Full High Definition Surgical Visualization System is designed for a wide variety of surgical applications and offers edge enhancement, automatic gain control, dynamic contrast function, selective color enhancement, smoke reduction, and grid removal features. It includes a portfolio of rigid scopes, cameras, and video processing systems.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT: http://www.fujifilmusa.com
FREEMIE BREAST MILK COLLECTION SYSTEM
Freemie® offers a hands-free breast-milk collection system with the Freemie Liberty Mobile Hands Free Breast Pump System and Next Generation Freemie Closed System Collection Cups.
The concealable pump has a rechargeable battery and hospital-power suction for single or double pumping. Programmable memory buttons allow the mother to preset or adjust speed and suction functions. Tubing lengths can be changed so that the pump can be placed on a desk, worn with a detachable belt clip, or carried in a bag.
Freemie says the cups are lower-profile and more compact than other pump system cups, and when placed on the breast under the mother’s bra, can be easily removed so that milk can be transferred to storage. Each cup, with a 25 mm or 28 mm funnel and valve, holds 8 oz of milk.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT: http://www.freemie.com
PREVENTEZA: EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTIVE
Combe, Inc, the maker of Vagisil®, has launched Preventeza™ (levonorgestrel tablet, 1.5 mg), an emergency contraceptive for the prevention of pregnancy if unprotected sex or failed birth control occurs.
Available online or over-the-counter as a single tablet, Preventeza is a proven option to help women prevent pregnancy before it starts by using a higher dose of levonorgestrel than most birth control pills. It must be used within 72 hours of unprotected intercourse, and is not intended to be used as regular birth control. Combe says that Preventeza works mainly by stopping the release of an egg from the ovary and may also prevent fertilization of an egg or prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in the uterus. Combe also says that levonorgestrel 1.5 mg will not work if the woman is already pregnant and will not affect an existing pregnancy.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT: https://www.vagisil.com/products/preventeza-emergency-contraceptive
UPSPRING’S C-PANTY FOR POSTCESAREAN RECOVERY
UpSpring® says that its patented C-Panty® undergarment provides medical-grade compression and speeds recovery after cesarean delivery. C-Panty helps to reduce swelling and discomfort, supports weakened muscles, and reduces the incision bulge without hooks, straps, or Velcro that might irritate the incision area.
C-Panty’s medical-grade silicone panel suppresses the formation of excess or improperly formed collagen, which can contribute to scarring, says UpSpring. The silicone may help reduce itchiness, and can lessen the chance of infection at the incision area. The silicone is durable, washable, and integrated into the panty, eliminating the need for scar gel or scar gel pads.
The C-Panty can be worn immediately after birth and for up to 12 months. If worn when the incision is not healed, the silicone panel should be covered with a panty liner or pad. Once the incision has healed, the covering can be discontinued.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT: https://www.upspringbaby.com/cpanty
NEW VISUALIZATION SYSTEMS FROM FUJIFILM
FUJIFILM New Development, USA, has introduced 2 visualization systems for minimally invasive surgery. Using proprietary technology, the Ultra-Slim Video Laparoscope System (EL-580FN) delivers enhanced image resolution, color fidelity, and display quality, says FUJIFILM. The product features include “Chip on the Tip” high-definition digital imaging processing, less fogging, autoclave sterilization reprocessing, and a low profile, lightweight ergonomic handle. The 3.8-mm-diameter distal end was designed to improve workflow, reduce physician fatigue, and potentially reduce the size of incisions. The accompanying Digital Video Processor System is used for endoscopic procedures with automatic light control, an anti-blur function for motion images, and digital zoom.
FUJIFILM reports that the Full High Definition Surgical Visualization System is designed for a wide variety of surgical applications and offers edge enhancement, automatic gain control, dynamic contrast function, selective color enhancement, smoke reduction, and grid removal features. It includes a portfolio of rigid scopes, cameras, and video processing systems.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT: http://www.fujifilmusa.com
FREEMIE BREAST MILK COLLECTION SYSTEM
Freemie® offers a hands-free breast-milk collection system with the Freemie Liberty Mobile Hands Free Breast Pump System and Next Generation Freemie Closed System Collection Cups.
The concealable pump has a rechargeable battery and hospital-power suction for single or double pumping. Programmable memory buttons allow the mother to preset or adjust speed and suction functions. Tubing lengths can be changed so that the pump can be placed on a desk, worn with a detachable belt clip, or carried in a bag.
Freemie says the cups are lower-profile and more compact than other pump system cups, and when placed on the breast under the mother’s bra, can be easily removed so that milk can be transferred to storage. Each cup, with a 25 mm or 28 mm funnel and valve, holds 8 oz of milk.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT: http://www.freemie.com
PREVENTEZA: EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTIVE
Combe, Inc, the maker of Vagisil®, has launched Preventeza™ (levonorgestrel tablet, 1.5 mg), an emergency contraceptive for the prevention of pregnancy if unprotected sex or failed birth control occurs.
Available online or over-the-counter as a single tablet, Preventeza is a proven option to help women prevent pregnancy before it starts by using a higher dose of levonorgestrel than most birth control pills. It must be used within 72 hours of unprotected intercourse, and is not intended to be used as regular birth control. Combe says that Preventeza works mainly by stopping the release of an egg from the ovary and may also prevent fertilization of an egg or prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in the uterus. Combe also says that levonorgestrel 1.5 mg will not work if the woman is already pregnant and will not affect an existing pregnancy.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT: https://www.vagisil.com/products/preventeza-emergency-contraceptive
UPSPRING’S C-PANTY FOR POSTCESAREAN RECOVERY
UpSpring® says that its patented C-Panty® undergarment provides medical-grade compression and speeds recovery after cesarean delivery. C-Panty helps to reduce swelling and discomfort, supports weakened muscles, and reduces the incision bulge without hooks, straps, or Velcro that might irritate the incision area.
C-Panty’s medical-grade silicone panel suppresses the formation of excess or improperly formed collagen, which can contribute to scarring, says UpSpring. The silicone may help reduce itchiness, and can lessen the chance of infection at the incision area. The silicone is durable, washable, and integrated into the panty, eliminating the need for scar gel or scar gel pads.
The C-Panty can be worn immediately after birth and for up to 12 months. If worn when the incision is not healed, the silicone panel should be covered with a panty liner or pad. Once the incision has healed, the covering can be discontinued.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT: https://www.upspringbaby.com/cpanty
NEW VISUALIZATION SYSTEMS FROM FUJIFILM
FUJIFILM New Development, USA, has introduced 2 visualization systems for minimally invasive surgery. Using proprietary technology, the Ultra-Slim Video Laparoscope System (EL-580FN) delivers enhanced image resolution, color fidelity, and display quality, says FUJIFILM. The product features include “Chip on the Tip” high-definition digital imaging processing, less fogging, autoclave sterilization reprocessing, and a low profile, lightweight ergonomic handle. The 3.8-mm-diameter distal end was designed to improve workflow, reduce physician fatigue, and potentially reduce the size of incisions. The accompanying Digital Video Processor System is used for endoscopic procedures with automatic light control, an anti-blur function for motion images, and digital zoom.
FUJIFILM reports that the Full High Definition Surgical Visualization System is designed for a wide variety of surgical applications and offers edge enhancement, automatic gain control, dynamic contrast function, selective color enhancement, smoke reduction, and grid removal features. It includes a portfolio of rigid scopes, cameras, and video processing systems.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT: http://www.fujifilmusa.com
FREEMIE BREAST MILK COLLECTION SYSTEM
Freemie® offers a hands-free breast-milk collection system with the Freemie Liberty Mobile Hands Free Breast Pump System and Next Generation Freemie Closed System Collection Cups.
The concealable pump has a rechargeable battery and hospital-power suction for single or double pumping. Programmable memory buttons allow the mother to preset or adjust speed and suction functions. Tubing lengths can be changed so that the pump can be placed on a desk, worn with a detachable belt clip, or carried in a bag.
Freemie says the cups are lower-profile and more compact than other pump system cups, and when placed on the breast under the mother’s bra, can be easily removed so that milk can be transferred to storage. Each cup, with a 25 mm or 28 mm funnel and valve, holds 8 oz of milk.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT: http://www.freemie.com
PREVENTEZA: EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTIVE
Combe, Inc, the maker of Vagisil®, has launched Preventeza™ (levonorgestrel tablet, 1.5 mg), an emergency contraceptive for the prevention of pregnancy if unprotected sex or failed birth control occurs.
Available online or over-the-counter as a single tablet, Preventeza is a proven option to help women prevent pregnancy before it starts by using a higher dose of levonorgestrel than most birth control pills. It must be used within 72 hours of unprotected intercourse, and is not intended to be used as regular birth control. Combe says that Preventeza works mainly by stopping the release of an egg from the ovary and may also prevent fertilization of an egg or prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in the uterus. Combe also says that levonorgestrel 1.5 mg will not work if the woman is already pregnant and will not affect an existing pregnancy.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT: https://www.vagisil.com/products/preventeza-emergency-contraceptive
UPSPRING’S C-PANTY FOR POSTCESAREAN RECOVERY
UpSpring® says that its patented C-Panty® undergarment provides medical-grade compression and speeds recovery after cesarean delivery. C-Panty helps to reduce swelling and discomfort, supports weakened muscles, and reduces the incision bulge without hooks, straps, or Velcro that might irritate the incision area.
C-Panty’s medical-grade silicone panel suppresses the formation of excess or improperly formed collagen, which can contribute to scarring, says UpSpring. The silicone may help reduce itchiness, and can lessen the chance of infection at the incision area. The silicone is durable, washable, and integrated into the panty, eliminating the need for scar gel or scar gel pads.
The C-Panty can be worn immediately after birth and for up to 12 months. If worn when the incision is not healed, the silicone panel should be covered with a panty liner or pad. Once the incision has healed, the covering can be discontinued.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT: https://www.upspringbaby.com/cpanty
Endometrial cancer survivors may need long-term cardiovascular monitoring
Endometrial cancer survivors are at increased long-term risk for a number of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, results of a large, population-based study suggest.
Even after adjustment for potentially confounding factors, the cohort of 2,648 endometrial cancer survivors in this retrospective study had a “high burden” of cardiovascular events compared with 10,503 age-matched women, according to the investigators.
That finding highlights a need for increased monitoring and risk management for cardiovascular disease in endometrial cancer survivors, potentially for up to 10 years, according to Sean Soisson, a PhD student in the division of public health at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, and his coinvestigators.
The study, published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, is not the first to find associations between endometrial cancer and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. However, many of the previous studies had small sample sizes, relied on patient-reported outcomes, or lacked a comparison group, according to investigators.
The study was based on data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Utah Cancer Registry for women diagnosed between 1997 and 2012 with an invasive first primary endometrial cancer. The investigators identified cardiovascular disease diagnoses in those patients based on review of electronic medical records and ambulatory surgery and inpatient data.
Endometrial cancer survivors had elevated risks for hypertension, heart disease, and blood vessel diseases at 1-5 years after diagnosis, and for some diseases, the risk persisted at 5-10 years after diagnosis, the investigators found.
Survivors were about 50% more likely to be diagnosed with cardiac dysrhythmias compared with the general population both at 1-5 years (hazard ratio, 1.55; 99% confidence interval, 1.23-1.97) and 5-10 years (HR, 1.41; 99% CI, 1.06-1.88) after diagnosis, according to reported data.
There was a twofold increase in risk of phlebitis, thrombophlebitis, and thromboembolism for survivors (HR, 2.07, 99% CI, 1.57-2.72), and risk remained elevated in the 5- to 10-year time frame (HR, 1.53; 99% CI, 1.08-2.17), data show.
Similar increases in risk were reported for other cardiovascular diseases at 1-5 years, and in some cases also at 5-10 years. Cerebrovascular disease was the only major category where no increased risk was found among endometrial cancer survivors, the investigators said.
Type of cancer treatment also may have influenced risk. Among patients who had endometrial cancer, radiation therapy and chemotherapy both increased risk for cardiovascular disorders versus surgery. Advanced age and obesity may have increased risk, the investigators added.
“Studies that examine risk for long-term cardiovascular outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors are becoming increasingly more critical because of the high overall survival rate among individuals diagnosed with endometrial cancer, the large number of endometrial cancer survivors, the projected increase in the number of endometrial cancer diagnoses, the introduction of more complex therapies, and the high mortality due to cardiovascular disease among endometrial cancer survivors,” the authors wrote.
The National Cancer Institute and other organizations supported the study. The authors had no conflicts of interest to disclose.
SOURCE: Soisson S, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 May 8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy070.
Endometrial cancer survivors are at increased long-term risk for a number of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, results of a large, population-based study suggest.
Even after adjustment for potentially confounding factors, the cohort of 2,648 endometrial cancer survivors in this retrospective study had a “high burden” of cardiovascular events compared with 10,503 age-matched women, according to the investigators.
That finding highlights a need for increased monitoring and risk management for cardiovascular disease in endometrial cancer survivors, potentially for up to 10 years, according to Sean Soisson, a PhD student in the division of public health at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, and his coinvestigators.
The study, published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, is not the first to find associations between endometrial cancer and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. However, many of the previous studies had small sample sizes, relied on patient-reported outcomes, or lacked a comparison group, according to investigators.
The study was based on data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Utah Cancer Registry for women diagnosed between 1997 and 2012 with an invasive first primary endometrial cancer. The investigators identified cardiovascular disease diagnoses in those patients based on review of electronic medical records and ambulatory surgery and inpatient data.
Endometrial cancer survivors had elevated risks for hypertension, heart disease, and blood vessel diseases at 1-5 years after diagnosis, and for some diseases, the risk persisted at 5-10 years after diagnosis, the investigators found.
Survivors were about 50% more likely to be diagnosed with cardiac dysrhythmias compared with the general population both at 1-5 years (hazard ratio, 1.55; 99% confidence interval, 1.23-1.97) and 5-10 years (HR, 1.41; 99% CI, 1.06-1.88) after diagnosis, according to reported data.
There was a twofold increase in risk of phlebitis, thrombophlebitis, and thromboembolism for survivors (HR, 2.07, 99% CI, 1.57-2.72), and risk remained elevated in the 5- to 10-year time frame (HR, 1.53; 99% CI, 1.08-2.17), data show.
Similar increases in risk were reported for other cardiovascular diseases at 1-5 years, and in some cases also at 5-10 years. Cerebrovascular disease was the only major category where no increased risk was found among endometrial cancer survivors, the investigators said.
Type of cancer treatment also may have influenced risk. Among patients who had endometrial cancer, radiation therapy and chemotherapy both increased risk for cardiovascular disorders versus surgery. Advanced age and obesity may have increased risk, the investigators added.
“Studies that examine risk for long-term cardiovascular outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors are becoming increasingly more critical because of the high overall survival rate among individuals diagnosed with endometrial cancer, the large number of endometrial cancer survivors, the projected increase in the number of endometrial cancer diagnoses, the introduction of more complex therapies, and the high mortality due to cardiovascular disease among endometrial cancer survivors,” the authors wrote.
The National Cancer Institute and other organizations supported the study. The authors had no conflicts of interest to disclose.
SOURCE: Soisson S, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 May 8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy070.
Endometrial cancer survivors are at increased long-term risk for a number of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, results of a large, population-based study suggest.
Even after adjustment for potentially confounding factors, the cohort of 2,648 endometrial cancer survivors in this retrospective study had a “high burden” of cardiovascular events compared with 10,503 age-matched women, according to the investigators.
That finding highlights a need for increased monitoring and risk management for cardiovascular disease in endometrial cancer survivors, potentially for up to 10 years, according to Sean Soisson, a PhD student in the division of public health at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, and his coinvestigators.
The study, published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, is not the first to find associations between endometrial cancer and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. However, many of the previous studies had small sample sizes, relied on patient-reported outcomes, or lacked a comparison group, according to investigators.
The study was based on data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Utah Cancer Registry for women diagnosed between 1997 and 2012 with an invasive first primary endometrial cancer. The investigators identified cardiovascular disease diagnoses in those patients based on review of electronic medical records and ambulatory surgery and inpatient data.
Endometrial cancer survivors had elevated risks for hypertension, heart disease, and blood vessel diseases at 1-5 years after diagnosis, and for some diseases, the risk persisted at 5-10 years after diagnosis, the investigators found.
Survivors were about 50% more likely to be diagnosed with cardiac dysrhythmias compared with the general population both at 1-5 years (hazard ratio, 1.55; 99% confidence interval, 1.23-1.97) and 5-10 years (HR, 1.41; 99% CI, 1.06-1.88) after diagnosis, according to reported data.
There was a twofold increase in risk of phlebitis, thrombophlebitis, and thromboembolism for survivors (HR, 2.07, 99% CI, 1.57-2.72), and risk remained elevated in the 5- to 10-year time frame (HR, 1.53; 99% CI, 1.08-2.17), data show.
Similar increases in risk were reported for other cardiovascular diseases at 1-5 years, and in some cases also at 5-10 years. Cerebrovascular disease was the only major category where no increased risk was found among endometrial cancer survivors, the investigators said.
Type of cancer treatment also may have influenced risk. Among patients who had endometrial cancer, radiation therapy and chemotherapy both increased risk for cardiovascular disorders versus surgery. Advanced age and obesity may have increased risk, the investigators added.
“Studies that examine risk for long-term cardiovascular outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors are becoming increasingly more critical because of the high overall survival rate among individuals diagnosed with endometrial cancer, the large number of endometrial cancer survivors, the projected increase in the number of endometrial cancer diagnoses, the introduction of more complex therapies, and the high mortality due to cardiovascular disease among endometrial cancer survivors,” the authors wrote.
The National Cancer Institute and other organizations supported the study. The authors had no conflicts of interest to disclose.
SOURCE: Soisson S, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 May 8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy070.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
Key clinical point: Endometrial cancer survivors may require increased monitoring for cardiovascular disease up to 10 years after diagnosis.
Major finding: Survivors were at increased risk of phlebitis, thrombophlebitis, and thromboembolism (HR, 2.07), cardiac dysrhythmias (HR, 1.55), and other cardiovascular diseases at 1-5 years after diagnosis, with some risks persisting in the 5- to 10-year evaluation time frame.
Study details: A retrospective, population-based cohort study of 2,648 endometrial cancer survivors diagnosed between 1997 and 2012 and 10,503 age-matched controls.
Disclosures: The National Cancer Institute and other organizations supported the study. The authors had no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Source: Soisson S et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 May 8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy070.
2018 Update on menopause
Our knowledge regarding the benefits and risks of systemic menopausal hormone therapy (HT) has continued to evolve since the 2002 publication of the initial findings of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). In late 2017, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued its recommendation against the use of menopausal HT for the prevention of chronic conditions. In this Menopause Update, Dr. JoAnn Manson, Dr. JoAnn Pinkerton, and I detail why we do not support the Task Force’s recommendation. In a sidebar discussion, Dr. Manson also reviews the results of 2 WHI HT trials, published in September 2017, that analyzed mortality in trial participants over an 18-year follow-up.
In addition, I summarize an observational study that assessed the association of HT and Alzheimer disease (AD) as well as a clinical trial that compared the impact of oral versus transdermal estrogen on sexuality in recently menopausal women.
What's the impact of long-term use of systemic HT on Alzheimer disease risk?
Imtiaz B, Tuppurainen M, Rikkonen T, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and Alzheimer disease: a prospective cohort study. Neurology. 2017;88(11):1062-1068.
Data from the WHI HT randomized trials have clarified that initiation of oral HT among women aged 65 and older increases the risk of cognitive decline. By contrast, an analysis of younger WHI participants found that oral HT had no impact on cognitive function. Recently, Imtiaz and colleagues conducted a prospective cohort study of postmenopausal HT and AD in women residing in a Finnish county, with 25 years of follow-up. A diagnosis of AD was based on administrative health records and use of medications prescribed specifically to treat dementia. Use of systemic HT was identified via self-report. Overall, among more than 8,000 women followed, 227 cases of AD (mean age, 72 years) were identified.
In an analysis that controlled for factors including age, body mass index, alcohol use, smoking, physical activity, occupation status, and parity, up to 5 years of HT use was not associated with a risk of being diagnosed with AD. Five to 10 years of HT use was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.89, an 11% risk reduction that did not achieve statistical significance. By contrast, more than 10 years' use of systemic HT was associated with an HR of 0.53, a statistically significant 47% reduction in risk of AD.1
Other studies found conflicting results
Three large randomized trials found that HT initiated early in menopause and continued for less than 7 years had no impact on cognitive function.2-4 The Cache County (Utah) long-term prospective cohort study, however, found that HT started early in menopause and continued for 10 years or longer was associated with a significant reduction in risk of AD.5
Of note are results from the 2017 report of 18-year cumulative mortality among WHI participants (see the box on page 30). In that study, mortality from AD and other dementia was lower among participants who were randomly assigned to treatment with estrogen alone versus placebo (HR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.94). With estrogen-progestin therapy, the HR was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.77-1.11), and the pooled HR for the 2 trials was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.74-0.98).6
NAMS guidance
The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) HT position statement recommends that prevention of dementia should not be considered an indication for HT use since definitive data are not available.7 The statement indicates also that estrogen therapy may have positive cognitive benefits when initiated immediately after early surgical menopause and taken until the average age of menopause to prevent health risks seen with early loss of hormones.
Definitive data from long-term randomized clinical trials are not likely to become available. Observational trials continue to have methodologic issues, such as "healthy user bias," but the studies are reassuring that initiating HT close to menopause does not increase the risk of dementia. The long-term Finnish study by Imtiaz and colleagues and the Cache County study provide tentative observational data support for a "critical window" hypothesis, leaving open the possibility that initiating systemic HT soon after menopause onset and continuing it long term may reduce the risk of AD. Discussion is needed on individual patient characteristics, potential benefits and risks, and ongoing assessment over time.
Read Dr. Manson’s discussion of 18 years of follow-up data on menopause.
JoAnn E. Manson, MD, DrPH, NCMP
A new analysis from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized trials examined all-cause and cause-specific mortality during the intervention and postintervention follow-up periods.1 We followed more than 27,000 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 (mean age, 63) who were recruited to 2 randomized WHI trials of HT between 1993 and 1998. The trials continued until 2002 for the estrogen-progestin trial and to 2004 for the estrogen-alone trial. The trials ran for 5 to 7 years' duration, with post-stopping follow-up for an additional 10 to 12 years (total cumulative follow-up of 18 years).
The participants were randomly assigned to receive active treatment or placebo. The interventions were conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) versus placebo for women with an intact uterus and CEE alone versus placebo for women who had a hysterectomy.
All-cause mortality did not increase with HT use
The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality in the 2 pooled trials and in each trial individually. We found that there was no link between HT and all-cause mortality in the overall study population (ages 50-79) in either trial. However, there was a trend toward lower all-cause mortality among the younger women in both trials. In women aged 50 to 59, there was a statistically significant 31% lower risk of mortality in the pooled trials among women taking active HT compared with those taking placebo, but no reduction in mortality with HT among older women (P for trend by age = .01).
Notably, all-cause mortality provides a critically important summary measure for interventions such as HT that have a complex matrix of benefits and risks. We know that HT has a number of benefits in menopausal women. It reduces hot flashes and other menopausal symptoms. It lowers the risk of hip fracture, other types of bone fractures, and type 2 diabetes. However, HT increases the risk of venous thrombosis, stroke, and some forms of cancer.
A summary measure that assesses the net effect of a medication on serious and life-threatening health outcomes is very important. As such, all-cause mortality is the ultimate bottom line for the balance of benefits and risks. This speaks to why we conducted the mortality analysis--WHI is the largest randomized trial of HT with long-term follow-up, allowing detailed analyses by age group. Although there have been previous reports on individual health outcomes in the WHI trials, no previous report had specifically focused on all-cause and cause-specific mortality with HT, stratified by age group, over long-term follow-up.
Hopefully the results of this study will alleviate some of the anxiety associated with HT because, as mentioned, there was no increase in overall total mortality or specific major causes of death. In addition, the younger women had a trend toward benefit for all-cause mortality.
We think that these findings support the recommendations from The North American Menopause Society and other professional societies that endorse the use of HT for managing bothersome menopausal symptoms, especially when started in early menopause. These results should be reassuring that there is no increase in mortality with HT use. Although these findings do not support prescribing HT for the express purpose of trying to prevent cardiovascular disease, dementia, or other chronic diseases (due to some potential risks), they do support an important role of HT for management of bothersome hot flashes, especially in early menopause.
Cause-specific mortality
Regarding cause-specific mortality and HT use, we looked in detail at deaths from cardiovascular causes, cancer, dementia, and other major illness. Overall, we observed no increase or decrease in cardiovascular or cancer deaths. In the estrogen-alone trial, there was a surprising finding of a 26% reduction in dementia deaths. In the estrogen-progestin trial, the results were neutral for dementia deaths.
Overall, the cause-specific mortality results were neutral. This is surprising because even for total cancer deaths there was no increase or decrease, despite a great deal of anxiety about cancer risk with HT. It appears that for cancer, HT has complex effects: it increases some types of cancer, such as breast cancer, and decreases others, such as endometrial cancer (in the estrogen-progestin group), and possibly colorectal cancer. Moreover, CEE alone was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality, but it remains unclear if this applies to other formulations. HT's net effect on total cancer mortality was neutral in both trials, that is, no increase or decrease.
Cautions and takeaways
We need to keep in mind that in current clinical practice, lower doses and different formulations and routes of administration of HT are now often used, including transdermal estradiol patches, gels, sprays, and micronized progesterone. These formulations, and the lower doses, may have an even more favorable benefit-risk profile. We need additional research on the long-term benefits and risks of these newer formulations and lower dosages.
Generally, these findings from the WHI trials indicate that for women who have significant hot flashes, night sweats, or other bothersome menopausal symptoms, it's important to discuss their symptoms with their health care provider and understand that hormone therapy may be an option for them. If it's not an option, many other treatments are available, including nonhormonal prescription medications, nonprescription medications, and behavioral approaches.
These findings should alleviate some fear about HT use, especially in younger women who have an overall favorable trend in terms of all-cause mortality with treatment, plus a much lower absolute risk of adverse events than older women. In a woman in early menopause who has bothersome hot flashes or other symptoms that disrupt her sleep or impair her quality of life, it's likely that the benefits of HT will outweigh the risks.
Reference
- Manson JE, Aragaki AK, Rossouw JE, et al; for the WHI Investigators. Menopausal hormone therapy and long-term all-cause and cause-specific mortality: the Women's Health Initiative randomized trials. JAMA. 2017;318(10):927-938.
Read how the route of HT may affect sexuality outcomes.
Oral vs transdermal estrogen therapy: Is one preferable regarding sexuality?
Taylor HS, Tal A, Pal L, et al. Effects of oral vs transdermal estrogen therapy on sexual function in early post menopause: ancillary study of the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS). JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(10):1471-1479.
If route of administration of systemic HT influences sexuality outcomes in menopausal women, this would inform how we counsel our patients regarding HT.
Recently, Taylor and colleagues conducted a randomized clinical trial to examine the effects of HT's route of administration on sexual function.8 The 4-year Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS) ancillary sexual study randomly assigned 670 recently menopausal women to 0.45 mg of oral conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), an 0.05-mg estradiol transdermal patch, or placebo (with oral micronized progesterone for those on active treatment). The participants were aged 42 to 58 years and were within 36 months from their last menstrual period.
Participants were evaluated using the Female Sexual Function Inventory (FSFI) questionnaire, which assessed desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. The FSFI is scored using a point range of 0 to 36. A higher FSFI score indicates better sexual function. An FSFI score less than 26.55 depicts low sexual function (LSF).
Transdermal estrogen improved sexual function scores
Treatment with oral CEE was associated with no significant change in FSFI score compared with placebo, although benefits were seen for lubrication. By contrast, estrogen patch use improved the FSFI score (mean improvement, 2.6). Although improvement in FSFI score with transdermal estrogen was limited to participants with baseline LSF, most participants in fact had LSF at baseline.
Oral estrogen increases the liver's production of sex hormone-binding globulin, resulting in lower free (bioavailable) testosterone. Transdermal estrogen does not produce this effect. Accordingly, sexuality concerns may represent a reason to prefer the use of transdermal as opposed to oral estrogen.
Read about the authors’ concern over new USPSTF guidance.
The USPSTF recommendation against menopausal HT use for prevention of chronic conditions: Guidance that may confuse--and mislead
US Preventive Services Task Force; Grossman DC, CurrySJ, Owens DK, et al. Hormone therapy for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in postmenopausal women: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2017;318(22):2224-2233.
In late 2017, the USPSTF issued its recommendation against the use of menopausal HT for prevention of chronic conditions.9 We are concerned that this recommendation will be misconstrued as suggesting that the use of HT is not appropriate for any indication, including treatment of bothersome menopausal symptoms.
Although the Task Force's report briefly indicated that the guidance does not refer to HT use for treatment of symptoms, this important disclaimer likely will be overlooked or ignored by many readers. The result may be increased uncertainty and anxiety in decision making regarding HT use. Thus, we might see a further decline in the proportion of menopausal women who are prescribed appropriate treatment for symptoms that impair quality of life.
HT use improves menopausal symptoms
According to the 2017 NAMS Position Statement, for symptomatic women in early menopause (that is, younger than age 60 or within 10 years of menopause onset) and free of contraindications to treatment, use of systemic HT is appropriate.7 Currently, clinicians are reluctant to prescribe HT, and women are apprehensive regarding its use.10 Unfortunately, the USPSTF guidance may further discourage appropriate treatment of menopausal symptoms.
Findings from randomized clinical trials, as well as preclinical, clinical, and epidemiologic studies, clarify the favorable benefit-risk profile for HT use by recently menopausal women with bothersome vasomotor and related menopausal symptoms.7,10-12
Notably, the USPSTF guidance does not address women with premature or early menopause, those with persistent (long-duration) vasomotor symptoms, or women at increased risk for osteoporosis and related fractures. Furthermore, the prevalent and undertreated condition, genitourinary syndrome of menopause, deserves but does not receive attention.
In recent decades, our understanding regarding HT's benefits and risks has advanced substantially. Guidance for clinicians and women should reflect this evolution and underscore the individualization and shared decision making that facilitates appropriate decisions regarding the use of HT.
Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.
- Imtiaz B, Tuppurainen M, Rikkonen T, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and Alzheimer disease: a prospective cohort study. Neurology. 2017;88(11):1062–1068.
- Espeland MA, Shumaker SA, Leng I, et al; WHIMSY Study Group. Long-term effects on cognitive function of postmenopausal hormone therapy prescribed to women aged 50 to 55 years. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(15):1429–1436.
- Gleason CE, Dowling NM, Wharton W, et al. Effects of hormone therapy on cognition and mood in recently postmenopausal women: findings from the randomized, controlled KEEPS-Cognitive and Affective Study. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001833;discussion e1001833.
- Henderson VW, St John JA, Hodis HN, et al. Cognitive effects of estradiol after menopause: a randomized trial of the timing hypothesis. Neurology. 2016;87(7):699–708.
- Shao H, Breitner JC, Whitmer RA, et al; Cache County Investigators. Hormone therapy and Alzheimer disease dementia: new findings from the Cache County Study. Neurology. 2012;79(18):1846–1852.
- Manson JE, Aragaki AK, Rossouw JE, et al; the WHI Investigators. Menopausal hormone therapy and long-term all-cause and cause-specific mortality: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trials. JAMA. 2017;318(10):927–938.
- NAMS 2017 Hormone Therapy Position Statement Advisory Panel. The 2017 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2017;24(7):728–753.
- Taylor HS, Tal A, Pal L, et al. Effects of oral vs transdermal estrogen therapy on sexual function in early post menopause: ancillary study of the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS). JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(10):1471–1479.
- US Preventive Services Task Force; Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK, et al. Hormone therapy for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in postmenopausal women: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2017;318(22):2224–2233.
- Manson JE, Kaunitz AM. Menopause management—getting clinical care back on track. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(9):803–806.
- Kaunitz AM, Manson JE. Management of menopausal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126(4):859–876.
- Manson JE, Chlebowski RT, Stefanick ML, et al. Menopausal hormone therapy and health outcomes during the intervention and extended poststopping phases of the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trials. JAMA. 2013;310(13):1353–1368.
Our knowledge regarding the benefits and risks of systemic menopausal hormone therapy (HT) has continued to evolve since the 2002 publication of the initial findings of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). In late 2017, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued its recommendation against the use of menopausal HT for the prevention of chronic conditions. In this Menopause Update, Dr. JoAnn Manson, Dr. JoAnn Pinkerton, and I detail why we do not support the Task Force’s recommendation. In a sidebar discussion, Dr. Manson also reviews the results of 2 WHI HT trials, published in September 2017, that analyzed mortality in trial participants over an 18-year follow-up.
In addition, I summarize an observational study that assessed the association of HT and Alzheimer disease (AD) as well as a clinical trial that compared the impact of oral versus transdermal estrogen on sexuality in recently menopausal women.
What's the impact of long-term use of systemic HT on Alzheimer disease risk?
Imtiaz B, Tuppurainen M, Rikkonen T, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and Alzheimer disease: a prospective cohort study. Neurology. 2017;88(11):1062-1068.
Data from the WHI HT randomized trials have clarified that initiation of oral HT among women aged 65 and older increases the risk of cognitive decline. By contrast, an analysis of younger WHI participants found that oral HT had no impact on cognitive function. Recently, Imtiaz and colleagues conducted a prospective cohort study of postmenopausal HT and AD in women residing in a Finnish county, with 25 years of follow-up. A diagnosis of AD was based on administrative health records and use of medications prescribed specifically to treat dementia. Use of systemic HT was identified via self-report. Overall, among more than 8,000 women followed, 227 cases of AD (mean age, 72 years) were identified.
In an analysis that controlled for factors including age, body mass index, alcohol use, smoking, physical activity, occupation status, and parity, up to 5 years of HT use was not associated with a risk of being diagnosed with AD. Five to 10 years of HT use was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.89, an 11% risk reduction that did not achieve statistical significance. By contrast, more than 10 years' use of systemic HT was associated with an HR of 0.53, a statistically significant 47% reduction in risk of AD.1
Other studies found conflicting results
Three large randomized trials found that HT initiated early in menopause and continued for less than 7 years had no impact on cognitive function.2-4 The Cache County (Utah) long-term prospective cohort study, however, found that HT started early in menopause and continued for 10 years or longer was associated with a significant reduction in risk of AD.5
Of note are results from the 2017 report of 18-year cumulative mortality among WHI participants (see the box on page 30). In that study, mortality from AD and other dementia was lower among participants who were randomly assigned to treatment with estrogen alone versus placebo (HR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.94). With estrogen-progestin therapy, the HR was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.77-1.11), and the pooled HR for the 2 trials was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.74-0.98).6
NAMS guidance
The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) HT position statement recommends that prevention of dementia should not be considered an indication for HT use since definitive data are not available.7 The statement indicates also that estrogen therapy may have positive cognitive benefits when initiated immediately after early surgical menopause and taken until the average age of menopause to prevent health risks seen with early loss of hormones.
Definitive data from long-term randomized clinical trials are not likely to become available. Observational trials continue to have methodologic issues, such as "healthy user bias," but the studies are reassuring that initiating HT close to menopause does not increase the risk of dementia. The long-term Finnish study by Imtiaz and colleagues and the Cache County study provide tentative observational data support for a "critical window" hypothesis, leaving open the possibility that initiating systemic HT soon after menopause onset and continuing it long term may reduce the risk of AD. Discussion is needed on individual patient characteristics, potential benefits and risks, and ongoing assessment over time.
Read Dr. Manson’s discussion of 18 years of follow-up data on menopause.
JoAnn E. Manson, MD, DrPH, NCMP
A new analysis from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized trials examined all-cause and cause-specific mortality during the intervention and postintervention follow-up periods.1 We followed more than 27,000 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 (mean age, 63) who were recruited to 2 randomized WHI trials of HT between 1993 and 1998. The trials continued until 2002 for the estrogen-progestin trial and to 2004 for the estrogen-alone trial. The trials ran for 5 to 7 years' duration, with post-stopping follow-up for an additional 10 to 12 years (total cumulative follow-up of 18 years).
The participants were randomly assigned to receive active treatment or placebo. The interventions were conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) versus placebo for women with an intact uterus and CEE alone versus placebo for women who had a hysterectomy.
All-cause mortality did not increase with HT use
The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality in the 2 pooled trials and in each trial individually. We found that there was no link between HT and all-cause mortality in the overall study population (ages 50-79) in either trial. However, there was a trend toward lower all-cause mortality among the younger women in both trials. In women aged 50 to 59, there was a statistically significant 31% lower risk of mortality in the pooled trials among women taking active HT compared with those taking placebo, but no reduction in mortality with HT among older women (P for trend by age = .01).
Notably, all-cause mortality provides a critically important summary measure for interventions such as HT that have a complex matrix of benefits and risks. We know that HT has a number of benefits in menopausal women. It reduces hot flashes and other menopausal symptoms. It lowers the risk of hip fracture, other types of bone fractures, and type 2 diabetes. However, HT increases the risk of venous thrombosis, stroke, and some forms of cancer.
A summary measure that assesses the net effect of a medication on serious and life-threatening health outcomes is very important. As such, all-cause mortality is the ultimate bottom line for the balance of benefits and risks. This speaks to why we conducted the mortality analysis--WHI is the largest randomized trial of HT with long-term follow-up, allowing detailed analyses by age group. Although there have been previous reports on individual health outcomes in the WHI trials, no previous report had specifically focused on all-cause and cause-specific mortality with HT, stratified by age group, over long-term follow-up.
Hopefully the results of this study will alleviate some of the anxiety associated with HT because, as mentioned, there was no increase in overall total mortality or specific major causes of death. In addition, the younger women had a trend toward benefit for all-cause mortality.
We think that these findings support the recommendations from The North American Menopause Society and other professional societies that endorse the use of HT for managing bothersome menopausal symptoms, especially when started in early menopause. These results should be reassuring that there is no increase in mortality with HT use. Although these findings do not support prescribing HT for the express purpose of trying to prevent cardiovascular disease, dementia, or other chronic diseases (due to some potential risks), they do support an important role of HT for management of bothersome hot flashes, especially in early menopause.
Cause-specific mortality
Regarding cause-specific mortality and HT use, we looked in detail at deaths from cardiovascular causes, cancer, dementia, and other major illness. Overall, we observed no increase or decrease in cardiovascular or cancer deaths. In the estrogen-alone trial, there was a surprising finding of a 26% reduction in dementia deaths. In the estrogen-progestin trial, the results were neutral for dementia deaths.
Overall, the cause-specific mortality results were neutral. This is surprising because even for total cancer deaths there was no increase or decrease, despite a great deal of anxiety about cancer risk with HT. It appears that for cancer, HT has complex effects: it increases some types of cancer, such as breast cancer, and decreases others, such as endometrial cancer (in the estrogen-progestin group), and possibly colorectal cancer. Moreover, CEE alone was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality, but it remains unclear if this applies to other formulations. HT's net effect on total cancer mortality was neutral in both trials, that is, no increase or decrease.
Cautions and takeaways
We need to keep in mind that in current clinical practice, lower doses and different formulations and routes of administration of HT are now often used, including transdermal estradiol patches, gels, sprays, and micronized progesterone. These formulations, and the lower doses, may have an even more favorable benefit-risk profile. We need additional research on the long-term benefits and risks of these newer formulations and lower dosages.
Generally, these findings from the WHI trials indicate that for women who have significant hot flashes, night sweats, or other bothersome menopausal symptoms, it's important to discuss their symptoms with their health care provider and understand that hormone therapy may be an option for them. If it's not an option, many other treatments are available, including nonhormonal prescription medications, nonprescription medications, and behavioral approaches.
These findings should alleviate some fear about HT use, especially in younger women who have an overall favorable trend in terms of all-cause mortality with treatment, plus a much lower absolute risk of adverse events than older women. In a woman in early menopause who has bothersome hot flashes or other symptoms that disrupt her sleep or impair her quality of life, it's likely that the benefits of HT will outweigh the risks.
Reference
- Manson JE, Aragaki AK, Rossouw JE, et al; for the WHI Investigators. Menopausal hormone therapy and long-term all-cause and cause-specific mortality: the Women's Health Initiative randomized trials. JAMA. 2017;318(10):927-938.
Read how the route of HT may affect sexuality outcomes.
Oral vs transdermal estrogen therapy: Is one preferable regarding sexuality?
Taylor HS, Tal A, Pal L, et al. Effects of oral vs transdermal estrogen therapy on sexual function in early post menopause: ancillary study of the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS). JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(10):1471-1479.
If route of administration of systemic HT influences sexuality outcomes in menopausal women, this would inform how we counsel our patients regarding HT.
Recently, Taylor and colleagues conducted a randomized clinical trial to examine the effects of HT's route of administration on sexual function.8 The 4-year Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS) ancillary sexual study randomly assigned 670 recently menopausal women to 0.45 mg of oral conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), an 0.05-mg estradiol transdermal patch, or placebo (with oral micronized progesterone for those on active treatment). The participants were aged 42 to 58 years and were within 36 months from their last menstrual period.
Participants were evaluated using the Female Sexual Function Inventory (FSFI) questionnaire, which assessed desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. The FSFI is scored using a point range of 0 to 36. A higher FSFI score indicates better sexual function. An FSFI score less than 26.55 depicts low sexual function (LSF).
Transdermal estrogen improved sexual function scores
Treatment with oral CEE was associated with no significant change in FSFI score compared with placebo, although benefits were seen for lubrication. By contrast, estrogen patch use improved the FSFI score (mean improvement, 2.6). Although improvement in FSFI score with transdermal estrogen was limited to participants with baseline LSF, most participants in fact had LSF at baseline.
Oral estrogen increases the liver's production of sex hormone-binding globulin, resulting in lower free (bioavailable) testosterone. Transdermal estrogen does not produce this effect. Accordingly, sexuality concerns may represent a reason to prefer the use of transdermal as opposed to oral estrogen.
Read about the authors’ concern over new USPSTF guidance.
The USPSTF recommendation against menopausal HT use for prevention of chronic conditions: Guidance that may confuse--and mislead
US Preventive Services Task Force; Grossman DC, CurrySJ, Owens DK, et al. Hormone therapy for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in postmenopausal women: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2017;318(22):2224-2233.
In late 2017, the USPSTF issued its recommendation against the use of menopausal HT for prevention of chronic conditions.9 We are concerned that this recommendation will be misconstrued as suggesting that the use of HT is not appropriate for any indication, including treatment of bothersome menopausal symptoms.
Although the Task Force's report briefly indicated that the guidance does not refer to HT use for treatment of symptoms, this important disclaimer likely will be overlooked or ignored by many readers. The result may be increased uncertainty and anxiety in decision making regarding HT use. Thus, we might see a further decline in the proportion of menopausal women who are prescribed appropriate treatment for symptoms that impair quality of life.
HT use improves menopausal symptoms
According to the 2017 NAMS Position Statement, for symptomatic women in early menopause (that is, younger than age 60 or within 10 years of menopause onset) and free of contraindications to treatment, use of systemic HT is appropriate.7 Currently, clinicians are reluctant to prescribe HT, and women are apprehensive regarding its use.10 Unfortunately, the USPSTF guidance may further discourage appropriate treatment of menopausal symptoms.
Findings from randomized clinical trials, as well as preclinical, clinical, and epidemiologic studies, clarify the favorable benefit-risk profile for HT use by recently menopausal women with bothersome vasomotor and related menopausal symptoms.7,10-12
Notably, the USPSTF guidance does not address women with premature or early menopause, those with persistent (long-duration) vasomotor symptoms, or women at increased risk for osteoporosis and related fractures. Furthermore, the prevalent and undertreated condition, genitourinary syndrome of menopause, deserves but does not receive attention.
In recent decades, our understanding regarding HT's benefits and risks has advanced substantially. Guidance for clinicians and women should reflect this evolution and underscore the individualization and shared decision making that facilitates appropriate decisions regarding the use of HT.
Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.
Our knowledge regarding the benefits and risks of systemic menopausal hormone therapy (HT) has continued to evolve since the 2002 publication of the initial findings of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). In late 2017, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued its recommendation against the use of menopausal HT for the prevention of chronic conditions. In this Menopause Update, Dr. JoAnn Manson, Dr. JoAnn Pinkerton, and I detail why we do not support the Task Force’s recommendation. In a sidebar discussion, Dr. Manson also reviews the results of 2 WHI HT trials, published in September 2017, that analyzed mortality in trial participants over an 18-year follow-up.
In addition, I summarize an observational study that assessed the association of HT and Alzheimer disease (AD) as well as a clinical trial that compared the impact of oral versus transdermal estrogen on sexuality in recently menopausal women.
What's the impact of long-term use of systemic HT on Alzheimer disease risk?
Imtiaz B, Tuppurainen M, Rikkonen T, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and Alzheimer disease: a prospective cohort study. Neurology. 2017;88(11):1062-1068.
Data from the WHI HT randomized trials have clarified that initiation of oral HT among women aged 65 and older increases the risk of cognitive decline. By contrast, an analysis of younger WHI participants found that oral HT had no impact on cognitive function. Recently, Imtiaz and colleagues conducted a prospective cohort study of postmenopausal HT and AD in women residing in a Finnish county, with 25 years of follow-up. A diagnosis of AD was based on administrative health records and use of medications prescribed specifically to treat dementia. Use of systemic HT was identified via self-report. Overall, among more than 8,000 women followed, 227 cases of AD (mean age, 72 years) were identified.
In an analysis that controlled for factors including age, body mass index, alcohol use, smoking, physical activity, occupation status, and parity, up to 5 years of HT use was not associated with a risk of being diagnosed with AD. Five to 10 years of HT use was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.89, an 11% risk reduction that did not achieve statistical significance. By contrast, more than 10 years' use of systemic HT was associated with an HR of 0.53, a statistically significant 47% reduction in risk of AD.1
Other studies found conflicting results
Three large randomized trials found that HT initiated early in menopause and continued for less than 7 years had no impact on cognitive function.2-4 The Cache County (Utah) long-term prospective cohort study, however, found that HT started early in menopause and continued for 10 years or longer was associated with a significant reduction in risk of AD.5
Of note are results from the 2017 report of 18-year cumulative mortality among WHI participants (see the box on page 30). In that study, mortality from AD and other dementia was lower among participants who were randomly assigned to treatment with estrogen alone versus placebo (HR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.94). With estrogen-progestin therapy, the HR was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.77-1.11), and the pooled HR for the 2 trials was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.74-0.98).6
NAMS guidance
The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) HT position statement recommends that prevention of dementia should not be considered an indication for HT use since definitive data are not available.7 The statement indicates also that estrogen therapy may have positive cognitive benefits when initiated immediately after early surgical menopause and taken until the average age of menopause to prevent health risks seen with early loss of hormones.
Definitive data from long-term randomized clinical trials are not likely to become available. Observational trials continue to have methodologic issues, such as "healthy user bias," but the studies are reassuring that initiating HT close to menopause does not increase the risk of dementia. The long-term Finnish study by Imtiaz and colleagues and the Cache County study provide tentative observational data support for a "critical window" hypothesis, leaving open the possibility that initiating systemic HT soon after menopause onset and continuing it long term may reduce the risk of AD. Discussion is needed on individual patient characteristics, potential benefits and risks, and ongoing assessment over time.
Read Dr. Manson’s discussion of 18 years of follow-up data on menopause.
JoAnn E. Manson, MD, DrPH, NCMP
A new analysis from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized trials examined all-cause and cause-specific mortality during the intervention and postintervention follow-up periods.1 We followed more than 27,000 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 (mean age, 63) who were recruited to 2 randomized WHI trials of HT between 1993 and 1998. The trials continued until 2002 for the estrogen-progestin trial and to 2004 for the estrogen-alone trial. The trials ran for 5 to 7 years' duration, with post-stopping follow-up for an additional 10 to 12 years (total cumulative follow-up of 18 years).
The participants were randomly assigned to receive active treatment or placebo. The interventions were conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) versus placebo for women with an intact uterus and CEE alone versus placebo for women who had a hysterectomy.
All-cause mortality did not increase with HT use
The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality in the 2 pooled trials and in each trial individually. We found that there was no link between HT and all-cause mortality in the overall study population (ages 50-79) in either trial. However, there was a trend toward lower all-cause mortality among the younger women in both trials. In women aged 50 to 59, there was a statistically significant 31% lower risk of mortality in the pooled trials among women taking active HT compared with those taking placebo, but no reduction in mortality with HT among older women (P for trend by age = .01).
Notably, all-cause mortality provides a critically important summary measure for interventions such as HT that have a complex matrix of benefits and risks. We know that HT has a number of benefits in menopausal women. It reduces hot flashes and other menopausal symptoms. It lowers the risk of hip fracture, other types of bone fractures, and type 2 diabetes. However, HT increases the risk of venous thrombosis, stroke, and some forms of cancer.
A summary measure that assesses the net effect of a medication on serious and life-threatening health outcomes is very important. As such, all-cause mortality is the ultimate bottom line for the balance of benefits and risks. This speaks to why we conducted the mortality analysis--WHI is the largest randomized trial of HT with long-term follow-up, allowing detailed analyses by age group. Although there have been previous reports on individual health outcomes in the WHI trials, no previous report had specifically focused on all-cause and cause-specific mortality with HT, stratified by age group, over long-term follow-up.
Hopefully the results of this study will alleviate some of the anxiety associated with HT because, as mentioned, there was no increase in overall total mortality or specific major causes of death. In addition, the younger women had a trend toward benefit for all-cause mortality.
We think that these findings support the recommendations from The North American Menopause Society and other professional societies that endorse the use of HT for managing bothersome menopausal symptoms, especially when started in early menopause. These results should be reassuring that there is no increase in mortality with HT use. Although these findings do not support prescribing HT for the express purpose of trying to prevent cardiovascular disease, dementia, or other chronic diseases (due to some potential risks), they do support an important role of HT for management of bothersome hot flashes, especially in early menopause.
Cause-specific mortality
Regarding cause-specific mortality and HT use, we looked in detail at deaths from cardiovascular causes, cancer, dementia, and other major illness. Overall, we observed no increase or decrease in cardiovascular or cancer deaths. In the estrogen-alone trial, there was a surprising finding of a 26% reduction in dementia deaths. In the estrogen-progestin trial, the results were neutral for dementia deaths.
Overall, the cause-specific mortality results were neutral. This is surprising because even for total cancer deaths there was no increase or decrease, despite a great deal of anxiety about cancer risk with HT. It appears that for cancer, HT has complex effects: it increases some types of cancer, such as breast cancer, and decreases others, such as endometrial cancer (in the estrogen-progestin group), and possibly colorectal cancer. Moreover, CEE alone was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality, but it remains unclear if this applies to other formulations. HT's net effect on total cancer mortality was neutral in both trials, that is, no increase or decrease.
Cautions and takeaways
We need to keep in mind that in current clinical practice, lower doses and different formulations and routes of administration of HT are now often used, including transdermal estradiol patches, gels, sprays, and micronized progesterone. These formulations, and the lower doses, may have an even more favorable benefit-risk profile. We need additional research on the long-term benefits and risks of these newer formulations and lower dosages.
Generally, these findings from the WHI trials indicate that for women who have significant hot flashes, night sweats, or other bothersome menopausal symptoms, it's important to discuss their symptoms with their health care provider and understand that hormone therapy may be an option for them. If it's not an option, many other treatments are available, including nonhormonal prescription medications, nonprescription medications, and behavioral approaches.
These findings should alleviate some fear about HT use, especially in younger women who have an overall favorable trend in terms of all-cause mortality with treatment, plus a much lower absolute risk of adverse events than older women. In a woman in early menopause who has bothersome hot flashes or other symptoms that disrupt her sleep or impair her quality of life, it's likely that the benefits of HT will outweigh the risks.
Reference
- Manson JE, Aragaki AK, Rossouw JE, et al; for the WHI Investigators. Menopausal hormone therapy and long-term all-cause and cause-specific mortality: the Women's Health Initiative randomized trials. JAMA. 2017;318(10):927-938.
Read how the route of HT may affect sexuality outcomes.
Oral vs transdermal estrogen therapy: Is one preferable regarding sexuality?
Taylor HS, Tal A, Pal L, et al. Effects of oral vs transdermal estrogen therapy on sexual function in early post menopause: ancillary study of the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS). JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(10):1471-1479.
If route of administration of systemic HT influences sexuality outcomes in menopausal women, this would inform how we counsel our patients regarding HT.
Recently, Taylor and colleagues conducted a randomized clinical trial to examine the effects of HT's route of administration on sexual function.8 The 4-year Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS) ancillary sexual study randomly assigned 670 recently menopausal women to 0.45 mg of oral conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), an 0.05-mg estradiol transdermal patch, or placebo (with oral micronized progesterone for those on active treatment). The participants were aged 42 to 58 years and were within 36 months from their last menstrual period.
Participants were evaluated using the Female Sexual Function Inventory (FSFI) questionnaire, which assessed desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. The FSFI is scored using a point range of 0 to 36. A higher FSFI score indicates better sexual function. An FSFI score less than 26.55 depicts low sexual function (LSF).
Transdermal estrogen improved sexual function scores
Treatment with oral CEE was associated with no significant change in FSFI score compared with placebo, although benefits were seen for lubrication. By contrast, estrogen patch use improved the FSFI score (mean improvement, 2.6). Although improvement in FSFI score with transdermal estrogen was limited to participants with baseline LSF, most participants in fact had LSF at baseline.
Oral estrogen increases the liver's production of sex hormone-binding globulin, resulting in lower free (bioavailable) testosterone. Transdermal estrogen does not produce this effect. Accordingly, sexuality concerns may represent a reason to prefer the use of transdermal as opposed to oral estrogen.
Read about the authors’ concern over new USPSTF guidance.
The USPSTF recommendation against menopausal HT use for prevention of chronic conditions: Guidance that may confuse--and mislead
US Preventive Services Task Force; Grossman DC, CurrySJ, Owens DK, et al. Hormone therapy for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in postmenopausal women: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2017;318(22):2224-2233.
In late 2017, the USPSTF issued its recommendation against the use of menopausal HT for prevention of chronic conditions.9 We are concerned that this recommendation will be misconstrued as suggesting that the use of HT is not appropriate for any indication, including treatment of bothersome menopausal symptoms.
Although the Task Force's report briefly indicated that the guidance does not refer to HT use for treatment of symptoms, this important disclaimer likely will be overlooked or ignored by many readers. The result may be increased uncertainty and anxiety in decision making regarding HT use. Thus, we might see a further decline in the proportion of menopausal women who are prescribed appropriate treatment for symptoms that impair quality of life.
HT use improves menopausal symptoms
According to the 2017 NAMS Position Statement, for symptomatic women in early menopause (that is, younger than age 60 or within 10 years of menopause onset) and free of contraindications to treatment, use of systemic HT is appropriate.7 Currently, clinicians are reluctant to prescribe HT, and women are apprehensive regarding its use.10 Unfortunately, the USPSTF guidance may further discourage appropriate treatment of menopausal symptoms.
Findings from randomized clinical trials, as well as preclinical, clinical, and epidemiologic studies, clarify the favorable benefit-risk profile for HT use by recently menopausal women with bothersome vasomotor and related menopausal symptoms.7,10-12
Notably, the USPSTF guidance does not address women with premature or early menopause, those with persistent (long-duration) vasomotor symptoms, or women at increased risk for osteoporosis and related fractures. Furthermore, the prevalent and undertreated condition, genitourinary syndrome of menopause, deserves but does not receive attention.
In recent decades, our understanding regarding HT's benefits and risks has advanced substantially. Guidance for clinicians and women should reflect this evolution and underscore the individualization and shared decision making that facilitates appropriate decisions regarding the use of HT.
Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.
- Imtiaz B, Tuppurainen M, Rikkonen T, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and Alzheimer disease: a prospective cohort study. Neurology. 2017;88(11):1062–1068.
- Espeland MA, Shumaker SA, Leng I, et al; WHIMSY Study Group. Long-term effects on cognitive function of postmenopausal hormone therapy prescribed to women aged 50 to 55 years. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(15):1429–1436.
- Gleason CE, Dowling NM, Wharton W, et al. Effects of hormone therapy on cognition and mood in recently postmenopausal women: findings from the randomized, controlled KEEPS-Cognitive and Affective Study. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001833;discussion e1001833.
- Henderson VW, St John JA, Hodis HN, et al. Cognitive effects of estradiol after menopause: a randomized trial of the timing hypothesis. Neurology. 2016;87(7):699–708.
- Shao H, Breitner JC, Whitmer RA, et al; Cache County Investigators. Hormone therapy and Alzheimer disease dementia: new findings from the Cache County Study. Neurology. 2012;79(18):1846–1852.
- Manson JE, Aragaki AK, Rossouw JE, et al; the WHI Investigators. Menopausal hormone therapy and long-term all-cause and cause-specific mortality: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trials. JAMA. 2017;318(10):927–938.
- NAMS 2017 Hormone Therapy Position Statement Advisory Panel. The 2017 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2017;24(7):728–753.
- Taylor HS, Tal A, Pal L, et al. Effects of oral vs transdermal estrogen therapy on sexual function in early post menopause: ancillary study of the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS). JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(10):1471–1479.
- US Preventive Services Task Force; Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK, et al. Hormone therapy for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in postmenopausal women: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2017;318(22):2224–2233.
- Manson JE, Kaunitz AM. Menopause management—getting clinical care back on track. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(9):803–806.
- Kaunitz AM, Manson JE. Management of menopausal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126(4):859–876.
- Manson JE, Chlebowski RT, Stefanick ML, et al. Menopausal hormone therapy and health outcomes during the intervention and extended poststopping phases of the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trials. JAMA. 2013;310(13):1353–1368.
- Imtiaz B, Tuppurainen M, Rikkonen T, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and Alzheimer disease: a prospective cohort study. Neurology. 2017;88(11):1062–1068.
- Espeland MA, Shumaker SA, Leng I, et al; WHIMSY Study Group. Long-term effects on cognitive function of postmenopausal hormone therapy prescribed to women aged 50 to 55 years. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(15):1429–1436.
- Gleason CE, Dowling NM, Wharton W, et al. Effects of hormone therapy on cognition and mood in recently postmenopausal women: findings from the randomized, controlled KEEPS-Cognitive and Affective Study. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001833;discussion e1001833.
- Henderson VW, St John JA, Hodis HN, et al. Cognitive effects of estradiol after menopause: a randomized trial of the timing hypothesis. Neurology. 2016;87(7):699–708.
- Shao H, Breitner JC, Whitmer RA, et al; Cache County Investigators. Hormone therapy and Alzheimer disease dementia: new findings from the Cache County Study. Neurology. 2012;79(18):1846–1852.
- Manson JE, Aragaki AK, Rossouw JE, et al; the WHI Investigators. Menopausal hormone therapy and long-term all-cause and cause-specific mortality: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trials. JAMA. 2017;318(10):927–938.
- NAMS 2017 Hormone Therapy Position Statement Advisory Panel. The 2017 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2017;24(7):728–753.
- Taylor HS, Tal A, Pal L, et al. Effects of oral vs transdermal estrogen therapy on sexual function in early post menopause: ancillary study of the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS). JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(10):1471–1479.
- US Preventive Services Task Force; Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK, et al. Hormone therapy for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in postmenopausal women: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2017;318(22):2224–2233.
- Manson JE, Kaunitz AM. Menopause management—getting clinical care back on track. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(9):803–806.
- Kaunitz AM, Manson JE. Management of menopausal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126(4):859–876.
- Manson JE, Chlebowski RT, Stefanick ML, et al. Menopausal hormone therapy and health outcomes during the intervention and extended poststopping phases of the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trials. JAMA. 2013;310(13):1353–1368.
June 2018 Question 2
Correct answer: C
Rationale
This patient has long-standing diabetes with associated complications from prolonged hyperglycemia, with symptoms of delayed gastric emptying. The next best step would be to perform a gastric-emptying study or scintigraphy to confirm the diagnosis of diabetic gastroparesis. A dietitian consult will be necessary once gastroparesis is confirmed, since dietary modifications are the mainstay of treatment. Strict blood glucose control is necessary to prevent worsening gastrointestinal symptoms, and an evaluation by an endocrinologist is reasonable if gastroparesis is confirmed. A trial of metoclopramide may be necessary if gastroparesis symptoms are not controlled with dietary modifications, but it would not be first-line treatment in diabetic gastroparesis.
References
1. Camilleri M. Advances in diabetic gastroparesis. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2002;2:47-56.
2. Camilleri M, Vazquez-Roque MI. Gastric dysmotility at the organ level in gastroparesis. In: Parkman H, McCallum R. Gastroparesis: Pathophysiology, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 37-46.
Correct answer: C
Rationale
This patient has long-standing diabetes with associated complications from prolonged hyperglycemia, with symptoms of delayed gastric emptying. The next best step would be to perform a gastric-emptying study or scintigraphy to confirm the diagnosis of diabetic gastroparesis. A dietitian consult will be necessary once gastroparesis is confirmed, since dietary modifications are the mainstay of treatment. Strict blood glucose control is necessary to prevent worsening gastrointestinal symptoms, and an evaluation by an endocrinologist is reasonable if gastroparesis is confirmed. A trial of metoclopramide may be necessary if gastroparesis symptoms are not controlled with dietary modifications, but it would not be first-line treatment in diabetic gastroparesis.
References
1. Camilleri M. Advances in diabetic gastroparesis. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2002;2:47-56.
2. Camilleri M, Vazquez-Roque MI. Gastric dysmotility at the organ level in gastroparesis. In: Parkman H, McCallum R. Gastroparesis: Pathophysiology, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 37-46.
Correct answer: C
Rationale
This patient has long-standing diabetes with associated complications from prolonged hyperglycemia, with symptoms of delayed gastric emptying. The next best step would be to perform a gastric-emptying study or scintigraphy to confirm the diagnosis of diabetic gastroparesis. A dietitian consult will be necessary once gastroparesis is confirmed, since dietary modifications are the mainstay of treatment. Strict blood glucose control is necessary to prevent worsening gastrointestinal symptoms, and an evaluation by an endocrinologist is reasonable if gastroparesis is confirmed. A trial of metoclopramide may be necessary if gastroparesis symptoms are not controlled with dietary modifications, but it would not be first-line treatment in diabetic gastroparesis.
References
1. Camilleri M. Advances in diabetic gastroparesis. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2002;2:47-56.
2. Camilleri M, Vazquez-Roque MI. Gastric dysmotility at the organ level in gastroparesis. In: Parkman H, McCallum R. Gastroparesis: Pathophysiology, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 37-46.
A 55-year-old obese man with long-standing type 2 diabetes mellitus complains of nausea and early satiety for over a year. His medical history is significant for retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy. His diabetes is treated with subcutaneous insulin and an oral hypoglycemic agent, but his recent glycosylated hemoglobin was 11.2%. Since the onset of symptoms, he has lost approximately 30 pounds. Recent upper endoscopy was normal.
Mild TBI May Increase Risk of Parkinson’s Disease Among Military Veterans
Among military veterans, mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with a 56% increased risk of developing Parkinson’s disease over 12 years of follow-up, according to data published online ahead of print April 18 in Neurology. Prior TBI also is associated with a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease two years earlier than among controls.
“Our findings highlight the critical importance of unraveling mechanisms subserving the association between TBI and Parkinson’s disease to inform treatment and prevention of post-TBI Parkinson’s disease,” said Raquel C. Gardner, MD, Assistant Professor of Neurology at the University of California, San Francisco.
A Longitudinal Cohort Study
Every year, mild TBI affects an estimated 42 million people worldwide. It is especially common among athletes and military personnel and is a growing epidemic among the elderly. In 2008, the Institute of Medicine found sufficient evidence to suggest an association between moderate to severe TBI and a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, but limited evidence for an association between mild TBI with loss of consciousness and a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. One small case–control study assessed the risk of Parkinson’s disease following mild TBI among military veterans, but the results were inconclusive, said the authors.
Dr. Gardner and colleagues conducted a longitudinal cohort study to evaluate the risk of Parkinson’s disease following TBI, including mild TBI, among patients in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). They analyzed data from three nationwide VHA health care system databases and identified patients with a diagnosis of TBI from October 2002 to September 2014. Participants were age 18 or older without Parkinson’s disease or dementia at baseline and were age-matched 1:1 to a random sample of patients without TBI.
Researchers defined moderate to severe TBI as a loss of consciousness for more than 30 minutes, alteration of consciousness for more than 24 hours, or amnesia for more than 24 hours. They defined mild TBI as loss of consciousness for zero to 30 minutes, alteration of consciousness for a moment to 24 hours, or amnesia for zero to 24 hours.
TBI exposure and severity were determined via detailed clinical assessments or ICD-9 codes using Department of Defense and Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center criteria. Baseline comorbidities and incident Parkinson’s disease at more than one year post TBI were identified using ICD-9 codes. In addition, investigators used Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for demographics and medical and psychiatric comorbidities to assess risk of Parkinson’s disease after TBI.
Prior TBI Was Associated With Minority Status
A total of 325,870 patients were included in the study with an average age of 47.9 and an average follow-up of 4.6 years. In all, 1,462 patients were diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease during follow-up. After adjusting for age, sex, race, education, and other health conditions, the researchers found that patients with any severity of TBI had a 71% increased risk of Parkinson’s disease; participants with moderate to severe TBI had an 83% increased risk.
Overall, patients with prior TBI were diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease at a significantly younger age, had significantly higher prevalence of non-Hispanic black and Hispanic race or ethnicity, and had significantly higher prevalence of all medical and psychiatric comorbidities, compared with those without prior TBI.
“Given the growing evidence for several potentially modifiable risk factors for Parkinson’s disease, an important area for future research will be to determine whether improved management of specific highly prevalent comorbidities among TBI-exposed veterans may reduce risk of subsequent Parkinson’s disease,” said the researchers.
Strengths of this study include the use of physicians’ diagnosis of TBI and Parkinson’s disease, a longitudinal cohort design, and a large sample size. One of the study’s limitations was the use of ICD-9 codes for the diagnosis of TBI and Parkinson’s disease, which may have overlooked some cases, such as TBI with polytrauma or mild
—Erica Tricarico
Suggested Reading
Gardner RC, Byers AL, Barnes DE, et al. Mild TBI and risk of Parkinson disease: a chronic effects of neurotrauma consortium study. Neurology. 2018 Apr 18 [Epub ahead of print].
Among military veterans, mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with a 56% increased risk of developing Parkinson’s disease over 12 years of follow-up, according to data published online ahead of print April 18 in Neurology. Prior TBI also is associated with a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease two years earlier than among controls.
“Our findings highlight the critical importance of unraveling mechanisms subserving the association between TBI and Parkinson’s disease to inform treatment and prevention of post-TBI Parkinson’s disease,” said Raquel C. Gardner, MD, Assistant Professor of Neurology at the University of California, San Francisco.
A Longitudinal Cohort Study
Every year, mild TBI affects an estimated 42 million people worldwide. It is especially common among athletes and military personnel and is a growing epidemic among the elderly. In 2008, the Institute of Medicine found sufficient evidence to suggest an association between moderate to severe TBI and a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, but limited evidence for an association between mild TBI with loss of consciousness and a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. One small case–control study assessed the risk of Parkinson’s disease following mild TBI among military veterans, but the results were inconclusive, said the authors.
Dr. Gardner and colleagues conducted a longitudinal cohort study to evaluate the risk of Parkinson’s disease following TBI, including mild TBI, among patients in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). They analyzed data from three nationwide VHA health care system databases and identified patients with a diagnosis of TBI from October 2002 to September 2014. Participants were age 18 or older without Parkinson’s disease or dementia at baseline and were age-matched 1:1 to a random sample of patients without TBI.
Researchers defined moderate to severe TBI as a loss of consciousness for more than 30 minutes, alteration of consciousness for more than 24 hours, or amnesia for more than 24 hours. They defined mild TBI as loss of consciousness for zero to 30 minutes, alteration of consciousness for a moment to 24 hours, or amnesia for zero to 24 hours.
TBI exposure and severity were determined via detailed clinical assessments or ICD-9 codes using Department of Defense and Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center criteria. Baseline comorbidities and incident Parkinson’s disease at more than one year post TBI were identified using ICD-9 codes. In addition, investigators used Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for demographics and medical and psychiatric comorbidities to assess risk of Parkinson’s disease after TBI.
Prior TBI Was Associated With Minority Status
A total of 325,870 patients were included in the study with an average age of 47.9 and an average follow-up of 4.6 years. In all, 1,462 patients were diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease during follow-up. After adjusting for age, sex, race, education, and other health conditions, the researchers found that patients with any severity of TBI had a 71% increased risk of Parkinson’s disease; participants with moderate to severe TBI had an 83% increased risk.
Overall, patients with prior TBI were diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease at a significantly younger age, had significantly higher prevalence of non-Hispanic black and Hispanic race or ethnicity, and had significantly higher prevalence of all medical and psychiatric comorbidities, compared with those without prior TBI.
“Given the growing evidence for several potentially modifiable risk factors for Parkinson’s disease, an important area for future research will be to determine whether improved management of specific highly prevalent comorbidities among TBI-exposed veterans may reduce risk of subsequent Parkinson’s disease,” said the researchers.
Strengths of this study include the use of physicians’ diagnosis of TBI and Parkinson’s disease, a longitudinal cohort design, and a large sample size. One of the study’s limitations was the use of ICD-9 codes for the diagnosis of TBI and Parkinson’s disease, which may have overlooked some cases, such as TBI with polytrauma or mild
—Erica Tricarico
Suggested Reading
Gardner RC, Byers AL, Barnes DE, et al. Mild TBI and risk of Parkinson disease: a chronic effects of neurotrauma consortium study. Neurology. 2018 Apr 18 [Epub ahead of print].
Among military veterans, mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with a 56% increased risk of developing Parkinson’s disease over 12 years of follow-up, according to data published online ahead of print April 18 in Neurology. Prior TBI also is associated with a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease two years earlier than among controls.
“Our findings highlight the critical importance of unraveling mechanisms subserving the association between TBI and Parkinson’s disease to inform treatment and prevention of post-TBI Parkinson’s disease,” said Raquel C. Gardner, MD, Assistant Professor of Neurology at the University of California, San Francisco.
A Longitudinal Cohort Study
Every year, mild TBI affects an estimated 42 million people worldwide. It is especially common among athletes and military personnel and is a growing epidemic among the elderly. In 2008, the Institute of Medicine found sufficient evidence to suggest an association between moderate to severe TBI and a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, but limited evidence for an association between mild TBI with loss of consciousness and a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. One small case–control study assessed the risk of Parkinson’s disease following mild TBI among military veterans, but the results were inconclusive, said the authors.
Dr. Gardner and colleagues conducted a longitudinal cohort study to evaluate the risk of Parkinson’s disease following TBI, including mild TBI, among patients in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). They analyzed data from three nationwide VHA health care system databases and identified patients with a diagnosis of TBI from October 2002 to September 2014. Participants were age 18 or older without Parkinson’s disease or dementia at baseline and were age-matched 1:1 to a random sample of patients without TBI.
Researchers defined moderate to severe TBI as a loss of consciousness for more than 30 minutes, alteration of consciousness for more than 24 hours, or amnesia for more than 24 hours. They defined mild TBI as loss of consciousness for zero to 30 minutes, alteration of consciousness for a moment to 24 hours, or amnesia for zero to 24 hours.
TBI exposure and severity were determined via detailed clinical assessments or ICD-9 codes using Department of Defense and Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center criteria. Baseline comorbidities and incident Parkinson’s disease at more than one year post TBI were identified using ICD-9 codes. In addition, investigators used Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for demographics and medical and psychiatric comorbidities to assess risk of Parkinson’s disease after TBI.
Prior TBI Was Associated With Minority Status
A total of 325,870 patients were included in the study with an average age of 47.9 and an average follow-up of 4.6 years. In all, 1,462 patients were diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease during follow-up. After adjusting for age, sex, race, education, and other health conditions, the researchers found that patients with any severity of TBI had a 71% increased risk of Parkinson’s disease; participants with moderate to severe TBI had an 83% increased risk.
Overall, patients with prior TBI were diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease at a significantly younger age, had significantly higher prevalence of non-Hispanic black and Hispanic race or ethnicity, and had significantly higher prevalence of all medical and psychiatric comorbidities, compared with those without prior TBI.
“Given the growing evidence for several potentially modifiable risk factors for Parkinson’s disease, an important area for future research will be to determine whether improved management of specific highly prevalent comorbidities among TBI-exposed veterans may reduce risk of subsequent Parkinson’s disease,” said the researchers.
Strengths of this study include the use of physicians’ diagnosis of TBI and Parkinson’s disease, a longitudinal cohort design, and a large sample size. One of the study’s limitations was the use of ICD-9 codes for the diagnosis of TBI and Parkinson’s disease, which may have overlooked some cases, such as TBI with polytrauma or mild
—Erica Tricarico
Suggested Reading
Gardner RC, Byers AL, Barnes DE, et al. Mild TBI and risk of Parkinson disease: a chronic effects of neurotrauma consortium study. Neurology. 2018 Apr 18 [Epub ahead of print].