Members in the News

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 14:37

 

Rajiv Datta, MD, FACS, FRCS, chief of surgery, South Nassau Communities Hospital, Oceanside, NY, recently received South Nassau’s 2017 Mary Pearson Award. The award is presented annually to an individual for extraordinary effort and individual contributions that advance the hospital’s mission to provide compassionate care and standard-setting health care services.

Dr. Datta, also medical director, Gertrude & Louis Feil Cancer Center, Valley Stream, NY, and director, division of surgical oncology and head and neck surgery, joined South Nassau in 2001 and has since gained an international reputation for leadership and surgical innovation. His leadership allowed Gertrude & Louis Feil Cancer Center to be equipped with cutting-edge cancer treatment technology, and colleagues and patients recognize Dr. Datta for his surgical skill and compassionate demeanor.

Dr. Datta (far right) with South Nassau representatives (from left) Richard J. Murphy, president and chief executive officer; Lori Edelman, RN, director of patient care services and 2017 Cupola Award recipient; and Joe Fennessy, chair, board of directors
American College of Surgeons Regent Henri R. Ford, MD, MHA, FACS, FRCS, FAAP, in March was named the new dean of University of Miami, FL, Miller School of Medicine. Dr. Ford will start in his new position June 1. At press time, he was vice-president and surgeon-in-chief, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, CA; and professor of surgery and vice-dean for medical education, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.

A Haitian immigrant who moved to the U.S. with his family when he was 13 years old, Dr. Ford was drawn to the Miller School of Medicine position because of the University of Miami’s dedication to providing medical resources to Haiti after the devastating 2010 earthquake. Dr. Ford regularly visits Haiti to assist in procedures and train surgeons. He performed Haiti’s first separation of conjoined twins in 2015.

Dr. Henry Ford
In his upcoming role, Dr. Ford aims to make the University of Miami Health System and the Miller School of Medicine a primary location for those seeking the latest and best in health care and biomedical research.

Frederick L. Greene, MD, FACS, clinical professor of surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, was awarded the Southeastern Surgical Congress (SESC) Distinguished Service Award in February. The award is the SESC’s highest honor, awarded to a member for their continued contributions, commitment, and service to the Congress.

Dr. Frederick L Greene
Dr. Greene was a Lieutenant Commander in the U.S. Navy Medical Corps, serving as surgeon on the USS Nimitz and at the Naval Regional Medical Center in Portsmouth, Virginia. He worked on the surgical faculty at the University of South Carolina, Columbia, for 17 years, and then Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, for 15 years. Dr. Greene has authored peer-reviewed manuscripts, book chapters, and textbooks, and participated on several editorial boards.

 

 


The SESC noted that Dr. Greene earned the organization’s Distinguished Service Award for his contributions to the field of surgery, which significantly added to the SESC’s mission of supporting professional development and educational opportunities.

Dr. Natan Zundel
Natan Zundel, MD, FACS, FASMBS, clinical professor of surgery and vice-chairman, department of surgery, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami Beach, recently was awarded the 2017 American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) Foundation Master Educator Award.

The Master Educator Award recognizes an ASMBS member who has demonstrated excellence as a master educator and mentor in the field of bariatric surgery. Recipients of this award have made significant contributions in at least one of the following areas: educational leadership, curriculum development, and education research; have participated in national educational meetings, educational publications in peer-review journals, and the creation of innovative teaching programs; and contributed to the development of Continuing Medical Education programs.

Dr. Zundel, Secretary-Treasurer of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) South Florida Chapter, is a world-renowned expert in minimally invasive and bariatric surgery. He has given lectures across the world and trained surgeons of all levels in bariatric and minimally invasive procedures.
 

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Rajiv Datta, MD, FACS, FRCS, chief of surgery, South Nassau Communities Hospital, Oceanside, NY, recently received South Nassau’s 2017 Mary Pearson Award. The award is presented annually to an individual for extraordinary effort and individual contributions that advance the hospital’s mission to provide compassionate care and standard-setting health care services.

Dr. Datta, also medical director, Gertrude & Louis Feil Cancer Center, Valley Stream, NY, and director, division of surgical oncology and head and neck surgery, joined South Nassau in 2001 and has since gained an international reputation for leadership and surgical innovation. His leadership allowed Gertrude & Louis Feil Cancer Center to be equipped with cutting-edge cancer treatment technology, and colleagues and patients recognize Dr. Datta for his surgical skill and compassionate demeanor.

Dr. Datta (far right) with South Nassau representatives (from left) Richard J. Murphy, president and chief executive officer; Lori Edelman, RN, director of patient care services and 2017 Cupola Award recipient; and Joe Fennessy, chair, board of directors
American College of Surgeons Regent Henri R. Ford, MD, MHA, FACS, FRCS, FAAP, in March was named the new dean of University of Miami, FL, Miller School of Medicine. Dr. Ford will start in his new position June 1. At press time, he was vice-president and surgeon-in-chief, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, CA; and professor of surgery and vice-dean for medical education, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.

A Haitian immigrant who moved to the U.S. with his family when he was 13 years old, Dr. Ford was drawn to the Miller School of Medicine position because of the University of Miami’s dedication to providing medical resources to Haiti after the devastating 2010 earthquake. Dr. Ford regularly visits Haiti to assist in procedures and train surgeons. He performed Haiti’s first separation of conjoined twins in 2015.

Dr. Henry Ford
In his upcoming role, Dr. Ford aims to make the University of Miami Health System and the Miller School of Medicine a primary location for those seeking the latest and best in health care and biomedical research.

Frederick L. Greene, MD, FACS, clinical professor of surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, was awarded the Southeastern Surgical Congress (SESC) Distinguished Service Award in February. The award is the SESC’s highest honor, awarded to a member for their continued contributions, commitment, and service to the Congress.

Dr. Frederick L Greene
Dr. Greene was a Lieutenant Commander in the U.S. Navy Medical Corps, serving as surgeon on the USS Nimitz and at the Naval Regional Medical Center in Portsmouth, Virginia. He worked on the surgical faculty at the University of South Carolina, Columbia, for 17 years, and then Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, for 15 years. Dr. Greene has authored peer-reviewed manuscripts, book chapters, and textbooks, and participated on several editorial boards.

 

 


The SESC noted that Dr. Greene earned the organization’s Distinguished Service Award for his contributions to the field of surgery, which significantly added to the SESC’s mission of supporting professional development and educational opportunities.

Dr. Natan Zundel
Natan Zundel, MD, FACS, FASMBS, clinical professor of surgery and vice-chairman, department of surgery, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami Beach, recently was awarded the 2017 American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) Foundation Master Educator Award.

The Master Educator Award recognizes an ASMBS member who has demonstrated excellence as a master educator and mentor in the field of bariatric surgery. Recipients of this award have made significant contributions in at least one of the following areas: educational leadership, curriculum development, and education research; have participated in national educational meetings, educational publications in peer-review journals, and the creation of innovative teaching programs; and contributed to the development of Continuing Medical Education programs.

Dr. Zundel, Secretary-Treasurer of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) South Florida Chapter, is a world-renowned expert in minimally invasive and bariatric surgery. He has given lectures across the world and trained surgeons of all levels in bariatric and minimally invasive procedures.
 

 

Rajiv Datta, MD, FACS, FRCS, chief of surgery, South Nassau Communities Hospital, Oceanside, NY, recently received South Nassau’s 2017 Mary Pearson Award. The award is presented annually to an individual for extraordinary effort and individual contributions that advance the hospital’s mission to provide compassionate care and standard-setting health care services.

Dr. Datta, also medical director, Gertrude & Louis Feil Cancer Center, Valley Stream, NY, and director, division of surgical oncology and head and neck surgery, joined South Nassau in 2001 and has since gained an international reputation for leadership and surgical innovation. His leadership allowed Gertrude & Louis Feil Cancer Center to be equipped with cutting-edge cancer treatment technology, and colleagues and patients recognize Dr. Datta for his surgical skill and compassionate demeanor.

Dr. Datta (far right) with South Nassau representatives (from left) Richard J. Murphy, president and chief executive officer; Lori Edelman, RN, director of patient care services and 2017 Cupola Award recipient; and Joe Fennessy, chair, board of directors
American College of Surgeons Regent Henri R. Ford, MD, MHA, FACS, FRCS, FAAP, in March was named the new dean of University of Miami, FL, Miller School of Medicine. Dr. Ford will start in his new position June 1. At press time, he was vice-president and surgeon-in-chief, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, CA; and professor of surgery and vice-dean for medical education, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.

A Haitian immigrant who moved to the U.S. with his family when he was 13 years old, Dr. Ford was drawn to the Miller School of Medicine position because of the University of Miami’s dedication to providing medical resources to Haiti after the devastating 2010 earthquake. Dr. Ford regularly visits Haiti to assist in procedures and train surgeons. He performed Haiti’s first separation of conjoined twins in 2015.

Dr. Henry Ford
In his upcoming role, Dr. Ford aims to make the University of Miami Health System and the Miller School of Medicine a primary location for those seeking the latest and best in health care and biomedical research.

Frederick L. Greene, MD, FACS, clinical professor of surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, was awarded the Southeastern Surgical Congress (SESC) Distinguished Service Award in February. The award is the SESC’s highest honor, awarded to a member for their continued contributions, commitment, and service to the Congress.

Dr. Frederick L Greene
Dr. Greene was a Lieutenant Commander in the U.S. Navy Medical Corps, serving as surgeon on the USS Nimitz and at the Naval Regional Medical Center in Portsmouth, Virginia. He worked on the surgical faculty at the University of South Carolina, Columbia, for 17 years, and then Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, for 15 years. Dr. Greene has authored peer-reviewed manuscripts, book chapters, and textbooks, and participated on several editorial boards.

 

 


The SESC noted that Dr. Greene earned the organization’s Distinguished Service Award for his contributions to the field of surgery, which significantly added to the SESC’s mission of supporting professional development and educational opportunities.

Dr. Natan Zundel
Natan Zundel, MD, FACS, FASMBS, clinical professor of surgery and vice-chairman, department of surgery, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami Beach, recently was awarded the 2017 American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) Foundation Master Educator Award.

The Master Educator Award recognizes an ASMBS member who has demonstrated excellence as a master educator and mentor in the field of bariatric surgery. Recipients of this award have made significant contributions in at least one of the following areas: educational leadership, curriculum development, and education research; have participated in national educational meetings, educational publications in peer-review journals, and the creation of innovative teaching programs; and contributed to the development of Continuing Medical Education programs.

Dr. Zundel, Secretary-Treasurer of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) South Florida Chapter, is a world-renowned expert in minimally invasive and bariatric surgery. He has given lectures across the world and trained surgeons of all levels in bariatric and minimally invasive procedures.
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

ACS seeks surgeon feedback on administrative burdens

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 14:37

 

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Division of Advocacy and Health Policy (DAHP) seeks feedback from Fellows about existing Medicare documentation requirements that are unnecessary, difficult to understand, complicate the submission of claims, and delay patient care. The DAHP will use surgeon input to establish policy recommendations for regulatory relief under the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Documentation Requirements Simplification (DRS) Initiative. The key objectives of the DRS Initiative are to eliminate documentation requirements that are no longer needed and to simplify the remaining documentation requirements to reduce improper payments and appeals. To share your story about Medicare documentation burdens, contact Lauren Foe, ACS Regulatory Associate, at [email protected].

The ACS will be submitting comments to CMS about documentation requirements as part of the College’s Stop Overregulating My OR (SOMO) initiative, through which the DAHP highlights specific regulatory and legislative actions that should be taken to reduce burdens and enable surgeons to reinvest their time and resources in patients. More information about ACS regulatory relief efforts can be found on the SOMO website at www.facs.org/advocacy/regulatory/somo.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Division of Advocacy and Health Policy (DAHP) seeks feedback from Fellows about existing Medicare documentation requirements that are unnecessary, difficult to understand, complicate the submission of claims, and delay patient care. The DAHP will use surgeon input to establish policy recommendations for regulatory relief under the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Documentation Requirements Simplification (DRS) Initiative. The key objectives of the DRS Initiative are to eliminate documentation requirements that are no longer needed and to simplify the remaining documentation requirements to reduce improper payments and appeals. To share your story about Medicare documentation burdens, contact Lauren Foe, ACS Regulatory Associate, at [email protected].

The ACS will be submitting comments to CMS about documentation requirements as part of the College’s Stop Overregulating My OR (SOMO) initiative, through which the DAHP highlights specific regulatory and legislative actions that should be taken to reduce burdens and enable surgeons to reinvest their time and resources in patients. More information about ACS regulatory relief efforts can be found on the SOMO website at www.facs.org/advocacy/regulatory/somo.

 

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Division of Advocacy and Health Policy (DAHP) seeks feedback from Fellows about existing Medicare documentation requirements that are unnecessary, difficult to understand, complicate the submission of claims, and delay patient care. The DAHP will use surgeon input to establish policy recommendations for regulatory relief under the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Documentation Requirements Simplification (DRS) Initiative. The key objectives of the DRS Initiative are to eliminate documentation requirements that are no longer needed and to simplify the remaining documentation requirements to reduce improper payments and appeals. To share your story about Medicare documentation burdens, contact Lauren Foe, ACS Regulatory Associate, at [email protected].

The ACS will be submitting comments to CMS about documentation requirements as part of the College’s Stop Overregulating My OR (SOMO) initiative, through which the DAHP highlights specific regulatory and legislative actions that should be taken to reduce burdens and enable surgeons to reinvest their time and resources in patients. More information about ACS regulatory relief efforts can be found on the SOMO website at www.facs.org/advocacy/regulatory/somo.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Inaugural Stop the Bleed Day Captures Worldwide Attention

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 14:37

 

An estimated 886 bleeding control courses were offered in the days leading up to March 31, the official day of observance, and on the day of the event itself. These courses were led by approximately 3,460 instructors who are now filing reports with the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Stop the Bleed® office on the number of attendees who completed the training.

Media coverage of the event was significant, with hundreds of local media reports released about the Stop the Bleed Day in their hometown newspapers, television stations, online blogs, and other media outlets across the nation. To date, Stop the Bleed Day has captured 798 media mentions and more than 736 million media impressions.

The ACS Bleedingcontrol.org website was a major source of information about the day. In fact, during the month of March the website experienced a high volume of traffic (174,253 page views). The ACS National Stop the Bleed Day web page (www.bleedingcontrol.org/march31) captured 5,487 page views, and an informational video (goo.gl/QLRnwC) explaining what the event was about captured more than 1,200 views on YouTube. Stop the Bleed training can now be found in all 50 states and in 65 countries.
 

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

An estimated 886 bleeding control courses were offered in the days leading up to March 31, the official day of observance, and on the day of the event itself. These courses were led by approximately 3,460 instructors who are now filing reports with the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Stop the Bleed® office on the number of attendees who completed the training.

Media coverage of the event was significant, with hundreds of local media reports released about the Stop the Bleed Day in their hometown newspapers, television stations, online blogs, and other media outlets across the nation. To date, Stop the Bleed Day has captured 798 media mentions and more than 736 million media impressions.

The ACS Bleedingcontrol.org website was a major source of information about the day. In fact, during the month of March the website experienced a high volume of traffic (174,253 page views). The ACS National Stop the Bleed Day web page (www.bleedingcontrol.org/march31) captured 5,487 page views, and an informational video (goo.gl/QLRnwC) explaining what the event was about captured more than 1,200 views on YouTube. Stop the Bleed training can now be found in all 50 states and in 65 countries.
 

 

An estimated 886 bleeding control courses were offered in the days leading up to March 31, the official day of observance, and on the day of the event itself. These courses were led by approximately 3,460 instructors who are now filing reports with the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Stop the Bleed® office on the number of attendees who completed the training.

Media coverage of the event was significant, with hundreds of local media reports released about the Stop the Bleed Day in their hometown newspapers, television stations, online blogs, and other media outlets across the nation. To date, Stop the Bleed Day has captured 798 media mentions and more than 736 million media impressions.

The ACS Bleedingcontrol.org website was a major source of information about the day. In fact, during the month of March the website experienced a high volume of traffic (174,253 page views). The ACS National Stop the Bleed Day web page (www.bleedingcontrol.org/march31) captured 5,487 page views, and an informational video (goo.gl/QLRnwC) explaining what the event was about captured more than 1,200 views on YouTube. Stop the Bleed training can now be found in all 50 states and in 65 countries.
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Review the 2017 ACS member survey results

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 14:37

 

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) has posted the results of the 2017 Member Survey conducted last summer, to which more than 4,400 ACS Fellows and Associate Fellows responded. An infographic (available at www.facs.org/member-services/2017-survey provides an overview of member response rates, along with information on member work settings, overall satisfaction, the value of membership, the likelihood of recommending membership to others, top member benefits by importance and satisfaction, and member experiences with ACS Chapters. The ACS also has posted more detailed survey findings, available at www.facs.org/member-services/2017-survey/findings along with descriptions of the actions being taken in response to the results.

The survey results were presented to the Board of Regents at its October 2017 meeting. In addition, the results were discussed with the ACS Executive Leadership Team and have been used to develop the 2018 ACS strategic plan.

We value your membership and appreciate you providing this useful feedback. Questions or comments should be directed to the Division of Member Services at [email protected].

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) has posted the results of the 2017 Member Survey conducted last summer, to which more than 4,400 ACS Fellows and Associate Fellows responded. An infographic (available at www.facs.org/member-services/2017-survey provides an overview of member response rates, along with information on member work settings, overall satisfaction, the value of membership, the likelihood of recommending membership to others, top member benefits by importance and satisfaction, and member experiences with ACS Chapters. The ACS also has posted more detailed survey findings, available at www.facs.org/member-services/2017-survey/findings along with descriptions of the actions being taken in response to the results.

The survey results were presented to the Board of Regents at its October 2017 meeting. In addition, the results were discussed with the ACS Executive Leadership Team and have been used to develop the 2018 ACS strategic plan.

We value your membership and appreciate you providing this useful feedback. Questions or comments should be directed to the Division of Member Services at [email protected].

 

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) has posted the results of the 2017 Member Survey conducted last summer, to which more than 4,400 ACS Fellows and Associate Fellows responded. An infographic (available at www.facs.org/member-services/2017-survey provides an overview of member response rates, along with information on member work settings, overall satisfaction, the value of membership, the likelihood of recommending membership to others, top member benefits by importance and satisfaction, and member experiences with ACS Chapters. The ACS also has posted more detailed survey findings, available at www.facs.org/member-services/2017-survey/findings along with descriptions of the actions being taken in response to the results.

The survey results were presented to the Board of Regents at its October 2017 meeting. In addition, the results were discussed with the ACS Executive Leadership Team and have been used to develop the 2018 ACS strategic plan.

We value your membership and appreciate you providing this useful feedback. Questions or comments should be directed to the Division of Member Services at [email protected].

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Nominate a Colleague for Dr. Mary Edwards Walker Inspiring Women in Surgery Award

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 14:37

 

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Women in Surgery Committee (WiSC) is accepting nominations for the annual Dr. Mary Edwards Walker Inspiring Women in Surgery Award through May 31. The award will be presented at Clinical Congress 2018 in Boston, MA, in recognition of an individual’s significant contributions to the advancement of women in the field of surgery.

The award is named in honor of Mary Edwards Walker, MD, for her role as the first woman surgeon employed by the U.S. Army and the only woman to receive the Congressional Medal of Honor, the highest U.S. Armed Forces decoration for bravery. Dr. Walker’s example paved the way for women surgeons of today.

Nominees must have demonstrated a commitment to the advancement and inspiration of women in surgery and be members of the ACS, either in active practice or retired. WiSC members are ineligible for this award. The awardee is expected to attend Clinical Congress 2018 to accept the honor in person.

All nominations must be accompanied by the following documents:

• A letter of nomination outlining how the nominee has contributed to the advancement of women in the field of surgery

• An up-to-date curriculum vitae (CV) of the nominee

• Self-nominations are acceptable and should include a letter of reference

The letter of nomination and CV should be sent to Connie Bura at [email protected].

Read more about Dr. Walker, complete award eligibility requirements, and the selection process on the ACS website at www.facs.org/about-acs/governance/acs-committees/women-in-surgery-committee/edwards-walker. Questions can be submitted to [email protected].

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Women in Surgery Committee (WiSC) is accepting nominations for the annual Dr. Mary Edwards Walker Inspiring Women in Surgery Award through May 31. The award will be presented at Clinical Congress 2018 in Boston, MA, in recognition of an individual’s significant contributions to the advancement of women in the field of surgery.

The award is named in honor of Mary Edwards Walker, MD, for her role as the first woman surgeon employed by the U.S. Army and the only woman to receive the Congressional Medal of Honor, the highest U.S. Armed Forces decoration for bravery. Dr. Walker’s example paved the way for women surgeons of today.

Nominees must have demonstrated a commitment to the advancement and inspiration of women in surgery and be members of the ACS, either in active practice or retired. WiSC members are ineligible for this award. The awardee is expected to attend Clinical Congress 2018 to accept the honor in person.

All nominations must be accompanied by the following documents:

• A letter of nomination outlining how the nominee has contributed to the advancement of women in the field of surgery

• An up-to-date curriculum vitae (CV) of the nominee

• Self-nominations are acceptable and should include a letter of reference

The letter of nomination and CV should be sent to Connie Bura at [email protected].

Read more about Dr. Walker, complete award eligibility requirements, and the selection process on the ACS website at www.facs.org/about-acs/governance/acs-committees/women-in-surgery-committee/edwards-walker. Questions can be submitted to [email protected].

 

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Women in Surgery Committee (WiSC) is accepting nominations for the annual Dr. Mary Edwards Walker Inspiring Women in Surgery Award through May 31. The award will be presented at Clinical Congress 2018 in Boston, MA, in recognition of an individual’s significant contributions to the advancement of women in the field of surgery.

The award is named in honor of Mary Edwards Walker, MD, for her role as the first woman surgeon employed by the U.S. Army and the only woman to receive the Congressional Medal of Honor, the highest U.S. Armed Forces decoration for bravery. Dr. Walker’s example paved the way for women surgeons of today.

Nominees must have demonstrated a commitment to the advancement and inspiration of women in surgery and be members of the ACS, either in active practice or retired. WiSC members are ineligible for this award. The awardee is expected to attend Clinical Congress 2018 to accept the honor in person.

All nominations must be accompanied by the following documents:

• A letter of nomination outlining how the nominee has contributed to the advancement of women in the field of surgery

• An up-to-date curriculum vitae (CV) of the nominee

• Self-nominations are acceptable and should include a letter of reference

The letter of nomination and CV should be sent to Connie Bura at [email protected].

Read more about Dr. Walker, complete award eligibility requirements, and the selection process on the ACS website at www.facs.org/about-acs/governance/acs-committees/women-in-surgery-committee/edwards-walker. Questions can be submitted to [email protected].

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Apply for 2018 Claude H. Organ, Jr., MD, FACS, Traveling Fellowship

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 14:37

 

The family and friends of the late Claude H. Organ, Jr., MD, FACS, Past-President of the American College of Surgeons (ACS), have established an endowment through the ACS Foundation to provide funding for an annual fellowship to be awarded to an outstanding young surgeon from the Society of Black Academic Surgeons, the Association of Women Surgeons, or the Surgical Section of the National Medical Association. The ACS is accepting applications for the Claude H. Organ, Jr., MD, FACS, Traveling Fellowship through June 1.

The fellowship, in the amount of $5,000, enables a U.S. or Canadian Fellow or Associate Fellow younger than 45 years old who is a member of one of the previously mentioned societies to attend an educational meeting or make an extended visit to an institution of his or her choice, tailored to his or her research interests.

Past awardees have used their fellowships to develop their careers in creative ways. The 2017 fellow, Kakra Hughes, MD, FACS, visited locations in Ethiopia and Ghana to begin to develop partnerships and a program for resident training in vascular surgery.

The full requirements for the Claude H. Organ, Jr., MD, FACS, Traveling Fellowship are posted on the ACS website at www.facs.org/member-services/scholarships/special/organ. A decision regarding this year’s awardee is scheduled to be announced in August 2018. Questions and application materials should be submitted to the attention of the ACS Scholarships Administrator at [email protected].

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The family and friends of the late Claude H. Organ, Jr., MD, FACS, Past-President of the American College of Surgeons (ACS), have established an endowment through the ACS Foundation to provide funding for an annual fellowship to be awarded to an outstanding young surgeon from the Society of Black Academic Surgeons, the Association of Women Surgeons, or the Surgical Section of the National Medical Association. The ACS is accepting applications for the Claude H. Organ, Jr., MD, FACS, Traveling Fellowship through June 1.

The fellowship, in the amount of $5,000, enables a U.S. or Canadian Fellow or Associate Fellow younger than 45 years old who is a member of one of the previously mentioned societies to attend an educational meeting or make an extended visit to an institution of his or her choice, tailored to his or her research interests.

Past awardees have used their fellowships to develop their careers in creative ways. The 2017 fellow, Kakra Hughes, MD, FACS, visited locations in Ethiopia and Ghana to begin to develop partnerships and a program for resident training in vascular surgery.

The full requirements for the Claude H. Organ, Jr., MD, FACS, Traveling Fellowship are posted on the ACS website at www.facs.org/member-services/scholarships/special/organ. A decision regarding this year’s awardee is scheduled to be announced in August 2018. Questions and application materials should be submitted to the attention of the ACS Scholarships Administrator at [email protected].

 

The family and friends of the late Claude H. Organ, Jr., MD, FACS, Past-President of the American College of Surgeons (ACS), have established an endowment through the ACS Foundation to provide funding for an annual fellowship to be awarded to an outstanding young surgeon from the Society of Black Academic Surgeons, the Association of Women Surgeons, or the Surgical Section of the National Medical Association. The ACS is accepting applications for the Claude H. Organ, Jr., MD, FACS, Traveling Fellowship through June 1.

The fellowship, in the amount of $5,000, enables a U.S. or Canadian Fellow or Associate Fellow younger than 45 years old who is a member of one of the previously mentioned societies to attend an educational meeting or make an extended visit to an institution of his or her choice, tailored to his or her research interests.

Past awardees have used their fellowships to develop their careers in creative ways. The 2017 fellow, Kakra Hughes, MD, FACS, visited locations in Ethiopia and Ghana to begin to develop partnerships and a program for resident training in vascular surgery.

The full requirements for the Claude H. Organ, Jr., MD, FACS, Traveling Fellowship are posted on the ACS website at www.facs.org/member-services/scholarships/special/organ. A decision regarding this year’s awardee is scheduled to be announced in August 2018. Questions and application materials should be submitted to the attention of the ACS Scholarships Administrator at [email protected].

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

CANVAS: Canagliflozin improved renal outcomes in diabetes

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/03/2022 - 15:19

AUSTIN, TEX. – Canagliflozin can improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes, even when they have mild or moderate kidney disease, new data from the CANVAS program suggested.

“The effect of canagliflozin on composite renal outcomes was large, particularly in people with preserved kidney function,” Brendon L. Neuen, MBBS, of University of New South Wales, Sydney, and his associates wrote in a poster. Baseline renal function also did not appear to affect the safety of canagliflozin, the investigators reported at a meeting sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation.

In patients with diabetes mellitus, increased proximal reabsorption of glucose and sodium decreases the amount of sodium reaching the macula densa in the distal convoluted tubule. This results in reduced use of adenosine triphosphate for sodium reabsorption, which thereby decreases adenosine release and vasoconstriction of afferent arterioles. Left unchecked, this dampening of the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism increases glomerular filtration and leads to diabetic nephropathy.

Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors such as canagliflozin (Invokana) and empagliflozin (Jardiance) help mitigate this pathology by vasoconstricting afferent arterioles. Previously, in an exploratory analysis of the multicenter, placebo-controlled EMPA-REG OUTCOME (Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes) trial, empagliflozin led to modest but statistically significant long-term reductions in urinary albumin secretion for diabetic patients, regardless of their baseline urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Aug;5[8]:610-21). Treatment with empagliflozin also significantly reduced the risk of developing microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria (P less than .0001).

The multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled CANVAS (Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study) and CANVAS-R (A Study of the Effects of Canagliflozin on Renal Endpoints in Adult Participants with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) trials included more than 10,000 adults with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk. In the primary analysis, canagliflozin significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke compared with placebo (N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377[7]:644-57).

Dr. Neuen and his associates compared the effects of canagliflozin on renal outcomes and safety among CANVAS patients whose estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was preserved (greater than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2) or reduced (less than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2). Actual mean eGFRs in each of these groups were 83 mL/min per 1.73 m2 and 49 mL/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. Compared with placebo, canagliflozin acutely reduced eGFR in patients with either preserved (average, –2.2 mL/min per 1.73 m2) or reduced (–2.83 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) baseline kidney function (P = 0.21).

 

 

Among patients with preserved function at baseline, canagliflozin was associated with a statistically significant 47% decrease in risk of renal death, end-stage kidney disease, or a 40% or greater drop in eGFR (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.73). Canagliflozin also showed renal benefits for patients with reduced kidney function, but the effect did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.49-1.17). Findings were similar when the researchers tweaked the composite renal endpoint by replacing the eGFR criterion with doubling of serum creatinine (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.75 and HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.37-1.77, respectively).

Canagliflozin has a black box warning for amputation risk. There was no indication that early renal function further increased this risk, the researchers reported. CANVAS patients who received canagliflozin underwent amputations (usually at the level of the toe or metatarsal) at rates of 6.3 per 1,000 person-years overall, 5.6 per 1,000 person-years in the setting of preserved kidney function, and 9.9 per 1,000 person-years in the setting of reduced kidney function. Rates in the placebo group were 3.4, 3.0, and 4.8 amputations per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Additionally, baseline renal status did not significantly affect risk of fracture, serious kidney-related adverse events, or serious acute kidney injury. Patients with baseline renal insufficiency were at increased risk of developing serious hyperkalemia (HR, 2.11; P = .06), but these events were uncommon in both treatment groups.

No CANVAS patient had stage 4 or worse kidney disease (eGFR less than 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2) at enrollment, the researchers noted. The ongoing phase 3 CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Endpoints in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial will shed more light on canagliflozin in the setting of renal disease, they added. This multicenter, double-blind trial compares canagliflozin with placebo in more than 4,000 patients with diabetic nephropathy. Results are expected in 2019.

Janssen funded the CANVAS and CANVAS-R trials. Disclosures were not provided.

SOURCE: Neuen BL et al. SCM 2018.
 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

AUSTIN, TEX. – Canagliflozin can improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes, even when they have mild or moderate kidney disease, new data from the CANVAS program suggested.

“The effect of canagliflozin on composite renal outcomes was large, particularly in people with preserved kidney function,” Brendon L. Neuen, MBBS, of University of New South Wales, Sydney, and his associates wrote in a poster. Baseline renal function also did not appear to affect the safety of canagliflozin, the investigators reported at a meeting sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation.

In patients with diabetes mellitus, increased proximal reabsorption of glucose and sodium decreases the amount of sodium reaching the macula densa in the distal convoluted tubule. This results in reduced use of adenosine triphosphate for sodium reabsorption, which thereby decreases adenosine release and vasoconstriction of afferent arterioles. Left unchecked, this dampening of the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism increases glomerular filtration and leads to diabetic nephropathy.

Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors such as canagliflozin (Invokana) and empagliflozin (Jardiance) help mitigate this pathology by vasoconstricting afferent arterioles. Previously, in an exploratory analysis of the multicenter, placebo-controlled EMPA-REG OUTCOME (Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes) trial, empagliflozin led to modest but statistically significant long-term reductions in urinary albumin secretion for diabetic patients, regardless of their baseline urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Aug;5[8]:610-21). Treatment with empagliflozin also significantly reduced the risk of developing microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria (P less than .0001).

The multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled CANVAS (Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study) and CANVAS-R (A Study of the Effects of Canagliflozin on Renal Endpoints in Adult Participants with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) trials included more than 10,000 adults with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk. In the primary analysis, canagliflozin significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke compared with placebo (N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377[7]:644-57).

Dr. Neuen and his associates compared the effects of canagliflozin on renal outcomes and safety among CANVAS patients whose estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was preserved (greater than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2) or reduced (less than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2). Actual mean eGFRs in each of these groups were 83 mL/min per 1.73 m2 and 49 mL/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. Compared with placebo, canagliflozin acutely reduced eGFR in patients with either preserved (average, –2.2 mL/min per 1.73 m2) or reduced (–2.83 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) baseline kidney function (P = 0.21).

 

 

Among patients with preserved function at baseline, canagliflozin was associated with a statistically significant 47% decrease in risk of renal death, end-stage kidney disease, or a 40% or greater drop in eGFR (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.73). Canagliflozin also showed renal benefits for patients with reduced kidney function, but the effect did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.49-1.17). Findings were similar when the researchers tweaked the composite renal endpoint by replacing the eGFR criterion with doubling of serum creatinine (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.75 and HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.37-1.77, respectively).

Canagliflozin has a black box warning for amputation risk. There was no indication that early renal function further increased this risk, the researchers reported. CANVAS patients who received canagliflozin underwent amputations (usually at the level of the toe or metatarsal) at rates of 6.3 per 1,000 person-years overall, 5.6 per 1,000 person-years in the setting of preserved kidney function, and 9.9 per 1,000 person-years in the setting of reduced kidney function. Rates in the placebo group were 3.4, 3.0, and 4.8 amputations per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Additionally, baseline renal status did not significantly affect risk of fracture, serious kidney-related adverse events, or serious acute kidney injury. Patients with baseline renal insufficiency were at increased risk of developing serious hyperkalemia (HR, 2.11; P = .06), but these events were uncommon in both treatment groups.

No CANVAS patient had stage 4 or worse kidney disease (eGFR less than 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2) at enrollment, the researchers noted. The ongoing phase 3 CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Endpoints in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial will shed more light on canagliflozin in the setting of renal disease, they added. This multicenter, double-blind trial compares canagliflozin with placebo in more than 4,000 patients with diabetic nephropathy. Results are expected in 2019.

Janssen funded the CANVAS and CANVAS-R trials. Disclosures were not provided.

SOURCE: Neuen BL et al. SCM 2018.
 

AUSTIN, TEX. – Canagliflozin can improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes, even when they have mild or moderate kidney disease, new data from the CANVAS program suggested.

“The effect of canagliflozin on composite renal outcomes was large, particularly in people with preserved kidney function,” Brendon L. Neuen, MBBS, of University of New South Wales, Sydney, and his associates wrote in a poster. Baseline renal function also did not appear to affect the safety of canagliflozin, the investigators reported at a meeting sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation.

In patients with diabetes mellitus, increased proximal reabsorption of glucose and sodium decreases the amount of sodium reaching the macula densa in the distal convoluted tubule. This results in reduced use of adenosine triphosphate for sodium reabsorption, which thereby decreases adenosine release and vasoconstriction of afferent arterioles. Left unchecked, this dampening of the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism increases glomerular filtration and leads to diabetic nephropathy.

Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors such as canagliflozin (Invokana) and empagliflozin (Jardiance) help mitigate this pathology by vasoconstricting afferent arterioles. Previously, in an exploratory analysis of the multicenter, placebo-controlled EMPA-REG OUTCOME (Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes) trial, empagliflozin led to modest but statistically significant long-term reductions in urinary albumin secretion for diabetic patients, regardless of their baseline urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Aug;5[8]:610-21). Treatment with empagliflozin also significantly reduced the risk of developing microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria (P less than .0001).

The multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled CANVAS (Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study) and CANVAS-R (A Study of the Effects of Canagliflozin on Renal Endpoints in Adult Participants with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) trials included more than 10,000 adults with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk. In the primary analysis, canagliflozin significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke compared with placebo (N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377[7]:644-57).

Dr. Neuen and his associates compared the effects of canagliflozin on renal outcomes and safety among CANVAS patients whose estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was preserved (greater than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2) or reduced (less than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2). Actual mean eGFRs in each of these groups were 83 mL/min per 1.73 m2 and 49 mL/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. Compared with placebo, canagliflozin acutely reduced eGFR in patients with either preserved (average, –2.2 mL/min per 1.73 m2) or reduced (–2.83 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) baseline kidney function (P = 0.21).

 

 

Among patients with preserved function at baseline, canagliflozin was associated with a statistically significant 47% decrease in risk of renal death, end-stage kidney disease, or a 40% or greater drop in eGFR (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.73). Canagliflozin also showed renal benefits for patients with reduced kidney function, but the effect did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.49-1.17). Findings were similar when the researchers tweaked the composite renal endpoint by replacing the eGFR criterion with doubling of serum creatinine (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.75 and HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.37-1.77, respectively).

Canagliflozin has a black box warning for amputation risk. There was no indication that early renal function further increased this risk, the researchers reported. CANVAS patients who received canagliflozin underwent amputations (usually at the level of the toe or metatarsal) at rates of 6.3 per 1,000 person-years overall, 5.6 per 1,000 person-years in the setting of preserved kidney function, and 9.9 per 1,000 person-years in the setting of reduced kidney function. Rates in the placebo group were 3.4, 3.0, and 4.8 amputations per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Additionally, baseline renal status did not significantly affect risk of fracture, serious kidney-related adverse events, or serious acute kidney injury. Patients with baseline renal insufficiency were at increased risk of developing serious hyperkalemia (HR, 2.11; P = .06), but these events were uncommon in both treatment groups.

No CANVAS patient had stage 4 or worse kidney disease (eGFR less than 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2) at enrollment, the researchers noted. The ongoing phase 3 CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Endpoints in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial will shed more light on canagliflozin in the setting of renal disease, they added. This multicenter, double-blind trial compares canagliflozin with placebo in more than 4,000 patients with diabetic nephropathy. Results are expected in 2019.

Janssen funded the CANVAS and CANVAS-R trials. Disclosures were not provided.

SOURCE: Neuen BL et al. SCM 2018.
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM SCM 18

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Canagliflozin improved kidney function and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Major finding: Reduction in risk of a composite endpoint (end-stage kidney disease, renal death, or at least 40% decline in eGFR) was 47% for patients with preserved baseline kidney function and 24% for patients with reduced baseline function.

Study details: Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of 10,140 patients (CANVAS and CANVAS-R).

Disclosures: Janssen funded the CANVAS and CANVAS-R trials.

Source: Neuen BL et al. SCM 2018.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

VIDEO: Health advisers boost type 2 diabetes adherence

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/03/2022 - 15:19

– A company that partners patients and health advisers claims to help patients with type 2 diabetes to manage their symptoms and lower their HbA1c levels.

The Pack Health program connects each patient with a health adviser, who contacts them five times a week using a mix of phone calls, text messages, and emails. The goals include helping patients to find clinicians in their area, make appointments, and adhere to treatment, Dhiren Patel, PharmD, medical director at Pack Health, said at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

In a prospective study of 756 type 2 diabetes patients, traditional modes of communication with a health coach were associated with a 1% decrease in HbA1c within 3 months and the reduction was maintained at 1 year. Patients lost an average of 5 pounds, and annual eye and foot exams increased by 17% and 19%, respectively.

Similar remote health coach initiatives are being used to help other patients with chronic health conditions as part of the Pack Health services, which Dr. Patel discussed in a video interview.

SOURCE: Patel D et al. AACE 2018. Abstract 1209.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

– A company that partners patients and health advisers claims to help patients with type 2 diabetes to manage their symptoms and lower their HbA1c levels.

The Pack Health program connects each patient with a health adviser, who contacts them five times a week using a mix of phone calls, text messages, and emails. The goals include helping patients to find clinicians in their area, make appointments, and adhere to treatment, Dhiren Patel, PharmD, medical director at Pack Health, said at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

In a prospective study of 756 type 2 diabetes patients, traditional modes of communication with a health coach were associated with a 1% decrease in HbA1c within 3 months and the reduction was maintained at 1 year. Patients lost an average of 5 pounds, and annual eye and foot exams increased by 17% and 19%, respectively.

Similar remote health coach initiatives are being used to help other patients with chronic health conditions as part of the Pack Health services, which Dr. Patel discussed in a video interview.

SOURCE: Patel D et al. AACE 2018. Abstract 1209.

– A company that partners patients and health advisers claims to help patients with type 2 diabetes to manage their symptoms and lower their HbA1c levels.

The Pack Health program connects each patient with a health adviser, who contacts them five times a week using a mix of phone calls, text messages, and emails. The goals include helping patients to find clinicians in their area, make appointments, and adhere to treatment, Dhiren Patel, PharmD, medical director at Pack Health, said at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

In a prospective study of 756 type 2 diabetes patients, traditional modes of communication with a health coach were associated with a 1% decrease in HbA1c within 3 months and the reduction was maintained at 1 year. Patients lost an average of 5 pounds, and annual eye and foot exams increased by 17% and 19%, respectively.

Similar remote health coach initiatives are being used to help other patients with chronic health conditions as part of the Pack Health services, which Dr. Patel discussed in a video interview.

SOURCE: Patel D et al. AACE 2018. Abstract 1209.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM AACE 2018

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

For Gram-negative bacteremias, 7 days of antibiotics is enough

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:40

– Seven days of antibiotic therapy was just as effective as 14 days for patients with Gram-negative bacteremias.

The shorter course was associated with similar cure rates and a faster return to normal activities, Dafna Yahav, MD, said at the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

Michele G. Sullivan/MDedge News
Dr. Dafna Yahav

“In patients hospitalized with Gram-negative bacteremia and sepsis, a course of 7 antibiotic days was not inferior to 14 days, and resulted in a more rapid return to baseline activity, “ said Dr. Yahav of the Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel. “This could lead to a change in accepted management algorithms and shortened antibiotic therapy. Potentially, though we did not show this in our trial, it may lead to reduced cost, reduced development of resistance, and fewer adverse events.”

During the past few years, a new dogma has emerged in antibiotic treatment paradigms, she said: Shorter is better. Brad Spellberg, MD, described this concept in his 2016 editorial in JAMA Internal Medicine, “The new antibiotic mantra” (Sep 1;176[9]:1254-5).

In it, Dr. Spellberg, of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, addressed the long-held view that a full 10- or 14-day course of antibiotics was necessary to decrease the risk of creating a resistant strain, even if clinical symptoms were long resolved.

However, he noted, there is little evidence supporting the idea that longer courses suppress the rise of resistance – and, in fact, some data support the opposite.

“To the contrary, specifically for pneumonia, studies have shown that longer courses of therapy result in more emergence of antibiotic resistance, which is consistent with everything we know about natural selection, the driver of antibiotic resistance,” he noted. “In only a few types of infections does resistance emerge at the site of infection; rather, resistance typically emerges off target, among colonizing flora away from the site of infection. Thus, all that is achieved by treating an infection with antibiotics for longer than the patient has symptoms is increased selective pressure driving antibiotic resistance among our colonizing microbial flora.”

 

 

The European Union and Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America have all recently updated their antibiotic stewardship guidelines to include a strong recommendation for the shortest effective duration of antimicrobial therapy.

However, most of the supporting data were drawn from randomized, controlled studies of patients with lung, skin, and kidney infections. Short-course treatments have not been adequately studied in bacteremia patients, Dr. Yahav said.

The aim of her study, which was investigator initiated and received no external funding, was to demonstrate the noninferiority of 7 days of antibiotic therapy, compared with 14 days, in patients with bacteremia arising from Gram-negative infections.

The randomized, open-label study comprised 604 patients in three hospitals: two in Israel and one in Italy. Patients were eligible if they had an aerobic Gram-negative bacteremia of any infection source that was either community- or hospital acquired. The medication choice was left up to the treating physician. Patients were assessed at discharge, and at days 30 and 90.
 

 

The primary outcome was a composite 90-day endpoint of all-cause mortality, clinical failure (relapse, new local complications, or distant complications), and readmission or hospital stay longer than 14 days. There were a number of secondary outcomes, including new infection, emergence of antibiotic resistance, total hospital and total antibiotic days, time to return to baseline activity, and adverse events.

The cohort was a mean of 71 years old. About 60% were functionally independent, and the mean Charlson comorbidity score was 2. Most of the infections (90%) were nosocomial. The urinary tract was the largest source of infection (69%). Other sources were abdominal, respiratory, central venous catheter, and skin or soft tissue.

Escherichia coli was the most common infective organism (62%), followed by Klebsiella species and Enterobacteriaceae. A small number of patients had Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas infections.

In the intent-to-treat analysis, the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality or extended hospital stay occurred in 46% of the 7-day group and 50% of the 14-day group – not significantly different. The results were nearly identical in the per-protocol analysis (46% vs. 49.6%).

 

 

Likewise, none of the secondary outcomes posted a significant difference in favor of one treatment arm, including relapse (2.9% vs. 2.7%) and resistance development (10.8% vs. 9.7%).

Dr. Yahav pointed out that total antibiotic-use days were significantly less in the 7-day group, (5 days) than in the 14-day group (10 days). Patients in the short-duration group returned to their normal activities a day earlier than those in the longer-term group (2 days vs. 3 days), a difference that was statistically significant.

The total hospital stay from randomization to day 90 was only half a day shorter in the short-term group (mean, 3 days vs. 3.5 days). That was not a significant finding.

There were some differences in adverse events, although none was statistically significant. The short-duration arm had slightly more cases of kidney injury (0.5%), fewer cases of liver function abnormalities (–1.5%), and half as many rashes (two vs. four). There were two cases of Clostridium difficile in the short-use arm and one in the long-use arm, also not a significant difference.
 

 


A subgroup analysis looked at outcomes among the different sources of infection (urinary tract vs. other), whether empirical antibiotics were used, and whether the induced resistance was multdrug or non–multidrug. All of those differences hovered close to the null, but generally favored short antibiotic treatment, Dr. Yahav noted.

“I would conclude from these data that is generally safe to stop antibiotics after 7 days of covering antibiotics for Gram-negative bacteremia patients, if they are hemodynamically stable and nonneutropenic at 7 days, and have no uncontrolled source of infection,” she concluded.

The investigator-initiated study had no outside funding.

SOURCE: Yahav D et al. ECCMID 2018. Oral abstract O1120.

 

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

– Seven days of antibiotic therapy was just as effective as 14 days for patients with Gram-negative bacteremias.

The shorter course was associated with similar cure rates and a faster return to normal activities, Dafna Yahav, MD, said at the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

Michele G. Sullivan/MDedge News
Dr. Dafna Yahav

“In patients hospitalized with Gram-negative bacteremia and sepsis, a course of 7 antibiotic days was not inferior to 14 days, and resulted in a more rapid return to baseline activity, “ said Dr. Yahav of the Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel. “This could lead to a change in accepted management algorithms and shortened antibiotic therapy. Potentially, though we did not show this in our trial, it may lead to reduced cost, reduced development of resistance, and fewer adverse events.”

During the past few years, a new dogma has emerged in antibiotic treatment paradigms, she said: Shorter is better. Brad Spellberg, MD, described this concept in his 2016 editorial in JAMA Internal Medicine, “The new antibiotic mantra” (Sep 1;176[9]:1254-5).

In it, Dr. Spellberg, of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, addressed the long-held view that a full 10- or 14-day course of antibiotics was necessary to decrease the risk of creating a resistant strain, even if clinical symptoms were long resolved.

However, he noted, there is little evidence supporting the idea that longer courses suppress the rise of resistance – and, in fact, some data support the opposite.

“To the contrary, specifically for pneumonia, studies have shown that longer courses of therapy result in more emergence of antibiotic resistance, which is consistent with everything we know about natural selection, the driver of antibiotic resistance,” he noted. “In only a few types of infections does resistance emerge at the site of infection; rather, resistance typically emerges off target, among colonizing flora away from the site of infection. Thus, all that is achieved by treating an infection with antibiotics for longer than the patient has symptoms is increased selective pressure driving antibiotic resistance among our colonizing microbial flora.”

 

 

The European Union and Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America have all recently updated their antibiotic stewardship guidelines to include a strong recommendation for the shortest effective duration of antimicrobial therapy.

However, most of the supporting data were drawn from randomized, controlled studies of patients with lung, skin, and kidney infections. Short-course treatments have not been adequately studied in bacteremia patients, Dr. Yahav said.

The aim of her study, which was investigator initiated and received no external funding, was to demonstrate the noninferiority of 7 days of antibiotic therapy, compared with 14 days, in patients with bacteremia arising from Gram-negative infections.

The randomized, open-label study comprised 604 patients in three hospitals: two in Israel and one in Italy. Patients were eligible if they had an aerobic Gram-negative bacteremia of any infection source that was either community- or hospital acquired. The medication choice was left up to the treating physician. Patients were assessed at discharge, and at days 30 and 90.
 

 

The primary outcome was a composite 90-day endpoint of all-cause mortality, clinical failure (relapse, new local complications, or distant complications), and readmission or hospital stay longer than 14 days. There were a number of secondary outcomes, including new infection, emergence of antibiotic resistance, total hospital and total antibiotic days, time to return to baseline activity, and adverse events.

The cohort was a mean of 71 years old. About 60% were functionally independent, and the mean Charlson comorbidity score was 2. Most of the infections (90%) were nosocomial. The urinary tract was the largest source of infection (69%). Other sources were abdominal, respiratory, central venous catheter, and skin or soft tissue.

Escherichia coli was the most common infective organism (62%), followed by Klebsiella species and Enterobacteriaceae. A small number of patients had Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas infections.

In the intent-to-treat analysis, the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality or extended hospital stay occurred in 46% of the 7-day group and 50% of the 14-day group – not significantly different. The results were nearly identical in the per-protocol analysis (46% vs. 49.6%).

 

 

Likewise, none of the secondary outcomes posted a significant difference in favor of one treatment arm, including relapse (2.9% vs. 2.7%) and resistance development (10.8% vs. 9.7%).

Dr. Yahav pointed out that total antibiotic-use days were significantly less in the 7-day group, (5 days) than in the 14-day group (10 days). Patients in the short-duration group returned to their normal activities a day earlier than those in the longer-term group (2 days vs. 3 days), a difference that was statistically significant.

The total hospital stay from randomization to day 90 was only half a day shorter in the short-term group (mean, 3 days vs. 3.5 days). That was not a significant finding.

There were some differences in adverse events, although none was statistically significant. The short-duration arm had slightly more cases of kidney injury (0.5%), fewer cases of liver function abnormalities (–1.5%), and half as many rashes (two vs. four). There were two cases of Clostridium difficile in the short-use arm and one in the long-use arm, also not a significant difference.
 

 


A subgroup analysis looked at outcomes among the different sources of infection (urinary tract vs. other), whether empirical antibiotics were used, and whether the induced resistance was multdrug or non–multidrug. All of those differences hovered close to the null, but generally favored short antibiotic treatment, Dr. Yahav noted.

“I would conclude from these data that is generally safe to stop antibiotics after 7 days of covering antibiotics for Gram-negative bacteremia patients, if they are hemodynamically stable and nonneutropenic at 7 days, and have no uncontrolled source of infection,” she concluded.

The investigator-initiated study had no outside funding.

SOURCE: Yahav D et al. ECCMID 2018. Oral abstract O1120.

 

 

– Seven days of antibiotic therapy was just as effective as 14 days for patients with Gram-negative bacteremias.

The shorter course was associated with similar cure rates and a faster return to normal activities, Dafna Yahav, MD, said at the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

Michele G. Sullivan/MDedge News
Dr. Dafna Yahav

“In patients hospitalized with Gram-negative bacteremia and sepsis, a course of 7 antibiotic days was not inferior to 14 days, and resulted in a more rapid return to baseline activity, “ said Dr. Yahav of the Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel. “This could lead to a change in accepted management algorithms and shortened antibiotic therapy. Potentially, though we did not show this in our trial, it may lead to reduced cost, reduced development of resistance, and fewer adverse events.”

During the past few years, a new dogma has emerged in antibiotic treatment paradigms, she said: Shorter is better. Brad Spellberg, MD, described this concept in his 2016 editorial in JAMA Internal Medicine, “The new antibiotic mantra” (Sep 1;176[9]:1254-5).

In it, Dr. Spellberg, of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, addressed the long-held view that a full 10- or 14-day course of antibiotics was necessary to decrease the risk of creating a resistant strain, even if clinical symptoms were long resolved.

However, he noted, there is little evidence supporting the idea that longer courses suppress the rise of resistance – and, in fact, some data support the opposite.

“To the contrary, specifically for pneumonia, studies have shown that longer courses of therapy result in more emergence of antibiotic resistance, which is consistent with everything we know about natural selection, the driver of antibiotic resistance,” he noted. “In only a few types of infections does resistance emerge at the site of infection; rather, resistance typically emerges off target, among colonizing flora away from the site of infection. Thus, all that is achieved by treating an infection with antibiotics for longer than the patient has symptoms is increased selective pressure driving antibiotic resistance among our colonizing microbial flora.”

 

 

The European Union and Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America have all recently updated their antibiotic stewardship guidelines to include a strong recommendation for the shortest effective duration of antimicrobial therapy.

However, most of the supporting data were drawn from randomized, controlled studies of patients with lung, skin, and kidney infections. Short-course treatments have not been adequately studied in bacteremia patients, Dr. Yahav said.

The aim of her study, which was investigator initiated and received no external funding, was to demonstrate the noninferiority of 7 days of antibiotic therapy, compared with 14 days, in patients with bacteremia arising from Gram-negative infections.

The randomized, open-label study comprised 604 patients in three hospitals: two in Israel and one in Italy. Patients were eligible if they had an aerobic Gram-negative bacteremia of any infection source that was either community- or hospital acquired. The medication choice was left up to the treating physician. Patients were assessed at discharge, and at days 30 and 90.
 

 

The primary outcome was a composite 90-day endpoint of all-cause mortality, clinical failure (relapse, new local complications, or distant complications), and readmission or hospital stay longer than 14 days. There were a number of secondary outcomes, including new infection, emergence of antibiotic resistance, total hospital and total antibiotic days, time to return to baseline activity, and adverse events.

The cohort was a mean of 71 years old. About 60% were functionally independent, and the mean Charlson comorbidity score was 2. Most of the infections (90%) were nosocomial. The urinary tract was the largest source of infection (69%). Other sources were abdominal, respiratory, central venous catheter, and skin or soft tissue.

Escherichia coli was the most common infective organism (62%), followed by Klebsiella species and Enterobacteriaceae. A small number of patients had Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas infections.

In the intent-to-treat analysis, the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality or extended hospital stay occurred in 46% of the 7-day group and 50% of the 14-day group – not significantly different. The results were nearly identical in the per-protocol analysis (46% vs. 49.6%).

 

 

Likewise, none of the secondary outcomes posted a significant difference in favor of one treatment arm, including relapse (2.9% vs. 2.7%) and resistance development (10.8% vs. 9.7%).

Dr. Yahav pointed out that total antibiotic-use days were significantly less in the 7-day group, (5 days) than in the 14-day group (10 days). Patients in the short-duration group returned to their normal activities a day earlier than those in the longer-term group (2 days vs. 3 days), a difference that was statistically significant.

The total hospital stay from randomization to day 90 was only half a day shorter in the short-term group (mean, 3 days vs. 3.5 days). That was not a significant finding.

There were some differences in adverse events, although none was statistically significant. The short-duration arm had slightly more cases of kidney injury (0.5%), fewer cases of liver function abnormalities (–1.5%), and half as many rashes (two vs. four). There were two cases of Clostridium difficile in the short-use arm and one in the long-use arm, also not a significant difference.
 

 


A subgroup analysis looked at outcomes among the different sources of infection (urinary tract vs. other), whether empirical antibiotics were used, and whether the induced resistance was multdrug or non–multidrug. All of those differences hovered close to the null, but generally favored short antibiotic treatment, Dr. Yahav noted.

“I would conclude from these data that is generally safe to stop antibiotics after 7 days of covering antibiotics for Gram-negative bacteremia patients, if they are hemodynamically stable and nonneutropenic at 7 days, and have no uncontrolled source of infection,” she concluded.

The investigator-initiated study had no outside funding.

SOURCE: Yahav D et al. ECCMID 2018. Oral abstract O1120.

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM ECCMID 2018

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Two weeks of antibiotic treatment conferred no benefits over 7 days of treatment in patients with Gram-negative bacteremias.

Major finding: All-cause mortality and extended hospital stay occurred in 46% of the 7-day group and 50% of the 14-day group – not significantly different.

Study details: The randomized, open-label trial comprised 604 patients.

Disclosures: The investigator-initiated study had no external funding. Dr. Yahav had no financial disclosures.

Source: Yahav D et al. ECCMID 2018. Oral Abstract O1120.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Blood type A linked to more-severe diarrhea

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 05/26/2021 - 13:49

Diarrhea associated with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) infection is more severe among individuals with blood type A, based on data from 106 adults exposed to the agent.

The reseachers speculate that the increased severity is related, in part, to the presence of an adhesin molecule known as EtpA, which binds to the surface of the cells and combines with blood group A glycans to promote a more severe infection.

“Our studies suggest that the many ETEC strains that produce the EtpA adhesin may be particularly well equipped to preferentially infect hosts who express A blood group antigen on mucosal surfaces,” wrote Pardeep Kumar, MD, of Washington University, Saint Louis, and his colleagues.

ETEC, associated with choleralike illness, remains a major cause of infectious diarrhea in developing countries. No current vaccine offers significant protection against it, but EtpA may be useful in vaccine development. “More recently discovered virulence factors and an improved understanding of ETEC microbial pathogenesis could offer additional avenues to protect those at highest risk for severe disease and uncover novel molecular targets for future vaccine development,” the researchers said.

In a study published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, the researchers examined blood samples from 106 adults who had participated in previous human infection model studies. The volunteers were challenged with an ETEC strain known as H10407 that was originally isolated from a case of choleralike illness.

Diarrhea was more frequent among A blood type individuals, compared with other types. Individuals with B or O blood types were significantly more likely to have no diarrhea or mild diarrhea after the E. coli challenge, compared with type A individuals (44% vs. 19%).

Overall, significantly more individuals with A or AB blood types developed moderate to severe diarrhea, compared with those with B or O blood types (81% vs. 56%). In addition, significantly more individuals with blood type A needed early initiation of antibiotic therapy, compared with those with B or O blood types (72% vs. 43%).

 

 

The study findings were limited by several factors, including the use of higher levels of bacteria to cause the infection than a typical exposure in nature. Also, the volunteers were treated with antibiotics once they met the criteria for severe diarrhea.

The researchers also noted that other blood group A lectins in addition to EtpA may not have been identified.

“While our recent studies have potentially important clinical and [vaccinological] implications, further study of the relationship between blood group, disease severity, and antigen expression could guide and inform use of these antigens in vaccines,” they wrote.

The study was supported by funds from the Enteric Vaccine Initiative of PATH, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Institutes of Health, and the Digestive Diseases Research Core Center at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Kumar P et al. J Clin Invest. 2018 May 17. doi: 10.1172/JCI97659.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Diarrhea associated with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) infection is more severe among individuals with blood type A, based on data from 106 adults exposed to the agent.

The reseachers speculate that the increased severity is related, in part, to the presence of an adhesin molecule known as EtpA, which binds to the surface of the cells and combines with blood group A glycans to promote a more severe infection.

“Our studies suggest that the many ETEC strains that produce the EtpA adhesin may be particularly well equipped to preferentially infect hosts who express A blood group antigen on mucosal surfaces,” wrote Pardeep Kumar, MD, of Washington University, Saint Louis, and his colleagues.

ETEC, associated with choleralike illness, remains a major cause of infectious diarrhea in developing countries. No current vaccine offers significant protection against it, but EtpA may be useful in vaccine development. “More recently discovered virulence factors and an improved understanding of ETEC microbial pathogenesis could offer additional avenues to protect those at highest risk for severe disease and uncover novel molecular targets for future vaccine development,” the researchers said.

In a study published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, the researchers examined blood samples from 106 adults who had participated in previous human infection model studies. The volunteers were challenged with an ETEC strain known as H10407 that was originally isolated from a case of choleralike illness.

Diarrhea was more frequent among A blood type individuals, compared with other types. Individuals with B or O blood types were significantly more likely to have no diarrhea or mild diarrhea after the E. coli challenge, compared with type A individuals (44% vs. 19%).

Overall, significantly more individuals with A or AB blood types developed moderate to severe diarrhea, compared with those with B or O blood types (81% vs. 56%). In addition, significantly more individuals with blood type A needed early initiation of antibiotic therapy, compared with those with B or O blood types (72% vs. 43%).

 

 

The study findings were limited by several factors, including the use of higher levels of bacteria to cause the infection than a typical exposure in nature. Also, the volunteers were treated with antibiotics once they met the criteria for severe diarrhea.

The researchers also noted that other blood group A lectins in addition to EtpA may not have been identified.

“While our recent studies have potentially important clinical and [vaccinological] implications, further study of the relationship between blood group, disease severity, and antigen expression could guide and inform use of these antigens in vaccines,” they wrote.

The study was supported by funds from the Enteric Vaccine Initiative of PATH, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Institutes of Health, and the Digestive Diseases Research Core Center at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Kumar P et al. J Clin Invest. 2018 May 17. doi: 10.1172/JCI97659.

Diarrhea associated with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) infection is more severe among individuals with blood type A, based on data from 106 adults exposed to the agent.

The reseachers speculate that the increased severity is related, in part, to the presence of an adhesin molecule known as EtpA, which binds to the surface of the cells and combines with blood group A glycans to promote a more severe infection.

“Our studies suggest that the many ETEC strains that produce the EtpA adhesin may be particularly well equipped to preferentially infect hosts who express A blood group antigen on mucosal surfaces,” wrote Pardeep Kumar, MD, of Washington University, Saint Louis, and his colleagues.

ETEC, associated with choleralike illness, remains a major cause of infectious diarrhea in developing countries. No current vaccine offers significant protection against it, but EtpA may be useful in vaccine development. “More recently discovered virulence factors and an improved understanding of ETEC microbial pathogenesis could offer additional avenues to protect those at highest risk for severe disease and uncover novel molecular targets for future vaccine development,” the researchers said.

In a study published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, the researchers examined blood samples from 106 adults who had participated in previous human infection model studies. The volunteers were challenged with an ETEC strain known as H10407 that was originally isolated from a case of choleralike illness.

Diarrhea was more frequent among A blood type individuals, compared with other types. Individuals with B or O blood types were significantly more likely to have no diarrhea or mild diarrhea after the E. coli challenge, compared with type A individuals (44% vs. 19%).

Overall, significantly more individuals with A or AB blood types developed moderate to severe diarrhea, compared with those with B or O blood types (81% vs. 56%). In addition, significantly more individuals with blood type A needed early initiation of antibiotic therapy, compared with those with B or O blood types (72% vs. 43%).

 

 

The study findings were limited by several factors, including the use of higher levels of bacteria to cause the infection than a typical exposure in nature. Also, the volunteers were treated with antibiotics once they met the criteria for severe diarrhea.

The researchers also noted that other blood group A lectins in addition to EtpA may not have been identified.

“While our recent studies have potentially important clinical and [vaccinological] implications, further study of the relationship between blood group, disease severity, and antigen expression could guide and inform use of these antigens in vaccines,” they wrote.

The study was supported by funds from the Enteric Vaccine Initiative of PATH, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Institutes of Health, and the Digestive Diseases Research Core Center at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Kumar P et al. J Clin Invest. 2018 May 17. doi: 10.1172/JCI97659.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Severe diarrhea was significantly more frequent in adults with an A blood type, compared with B or O types.

Major finding: The overall relative risk of moderate to severe diarrhea was 1.44 for A blood groups, compared with non-A blood groups.

Study details: The data come from 106 adult volunteers who had participated in previous human infection model studies.

Disclosures: The study was supported by funds from the PATH Enteric Vaccine Initiative, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Institutes of Health, and the Digestive Diseases Research Core Center at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Kumar P et al. J Clin Invest. 2018 May 17; doi: 10.1172/JCI97659.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica