8 common questions about newborn circumcision

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 11:10
Display Headline
8 common questions about newborn circumcision

In the United States, circumcision is the fourth most common surgical procedure—behind cataract removal, cesarean delivery, and joint replacement.1 This operation, which dates to ancient times, is chosen for medical, personal, or religious reasons. It is performed on 77% of males born in the United States and on 42% of those born elsewhere who are living in this country.2 Whether it is performed depends not only on the parents’ race, ethnic background, and religion but also on region: US circumcision rates range from 74% in the Midwest to 30% in the West, and in between are the Northeast (67%) and the South (61%).3

Circumcision is not without controversy. Some claim that it is unnecessary cosmetic surgery, that it is genital mutilation, that the patient cannot choose it or object to it, or that it decreases sexual satisfaction.

In this article, I review 8 common questions about circumcision and provide data-based answers to them.

1. Should a newborn be circumcised?

For many years, the medical benefits of circumcision were scientifically ambiguous. With no clear answers, some thought that parents should base their decision for or against circumcision not on any potential medical benefit but rather on their family or religious tradition, or on a social standard, that is, what the majority of families in their community do.

Over the past 20 years, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated real medical benefits of circumcision. In 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), which previously had been neutral on the subject, issued a task force report concluding that the health benefits of circumcision outweigh its risks and justify access to the procedure.3,4 However, the report stopped short of recommending circumcision.

Opponents have expressed several concerns about circumcision. First, they say, it is painful and unnecessary, and performing it when life has just begun takes the decision away from the adult-to-be, who may want to be uncircumcised as an adult but will have no recourse. Second, they say circumcision will diminish the adult’s sexual pleasure. However, there is no proof this occurs, and it is unclear how the claim could be adequately verified.5

Health benefits of circumcision3


  • Prevention of phimosis and balanoposthitis (inflammation of glans and foreskin), penile retraction disorders, and penile cancer
  • Fewer infant urinary tract infections
  • Decreased spread of human papillomavirus–related disease, including cervical cancer and its precursors, to sexual partners
  • Lower risk of acquiring, harboring, and spreading human immunodeficiency virus infection, herpes virus infection, and other sexually transmitted diseases
  • Easier genital hygiene
  • No need for circumcision later in life, when the procedure is more involved

2. What is the best analgesia for circumcision?

Although in decades past circumcision was often performed without any analgesia, in the United States analgesia is now standard of care. The AAP Task Force on Circumcision formalized this standard in a 2012 policy statement.4 For newborn circumcision, analgesia can be given in the form of analgesic cream, penile ring block, or dorsal nerve block.

Analgesic EMLA cream (a mixture of local anesthetics such as lidocaine 2.5%/prilocaine 2.5%) is easy to use but is minimally effective in relieving circumcision pain,6 although some investigators have reported it is efficacious compared with placebo.7 When used, the analgesic cream is applied 30 to 60 minutes before circumcision.

Both penile ring block and dorsal nerve block with 1% lidocaine are easy to administer and are very effective.8,9 They are best used with buffered lidocaine, which partially relieves the burning that occurs with injection. With both methods, the smaller the needle used (preferably 30 gauge), the better.

These 2 block methods have different injection sites. For the ring block, small amounts of lidocaine (1 to 1.5 mL) are given in a series of injections around the entire circumference of the base of the penis. The dorsal block targets the 2 dorsal nerves located at 10 o’clock and 2 o’clock at the base of the penis. Epinephrine, given its vasoconstrictive properties and the potential for necrosis, should never be used with local analgesia for penile infiltration.

Analgesia can be supplemented with comfort measures, such as a pacifier, sugar water, gentle rubbing on the forehead, and soothing speech.10

 

Related article:
Circumcision impedes viral disease. Will opposition fade?

 

3. What conditions are required for safe circumcision?

As circumcision is not medically required and need not occur in the days immediately after birth, it should be performed only when conditions are optimal:

  • A pediatrician or other practitioner must first examine the newborn.
  • The newborn must be full-term, healthy, and stable.
    • The best time to circumcise a baby born prematurely is right before discharge from the intensive care nursery.
  • The penis must be of normal size and without anatomical defect—no micropenis, hypospadias, or penoscrotal webbing.
  • The lower abdominal fat pad must not be so large that it will cause the shaft’s skin to cover the exposed penile head.
  • If there is a family history of a bleeding disorder, the newborn must be evaluated for the disorder before the circumcision.
  • The newborn must have received his vitamin K shot.

4. What is the best circumcision method?

Circumcision can be performed with the Gomco circumcision clamp, the Mogen circumcision clamp, or the PlastiBell circumcision device. Each device works well, provides excellent results, and has its pluses and minuses. Practitioners should use the device with which they are most familiar and comfortable, which likely will be the device they used in training.

In the United States, the Gomco clamp is perhaps the most commonly used device. It provides good cosmetic results, and its metal “bell” protects the entire head of the penis. Of the 3 methods, however, it is the most difficult—the partially cut foreskin must be threaded between the bell and the clamp frame before the clamp is tightened. In many cases, too, there is bleeding at the penile frenulum.

The Mogen clamp, another commonly used device, also is used in traditional Jewish circumcisions. Of the 3 methods, it is the quickest, produces the best hemostasis, and is associated with the least discomfort.10 To those unfamiliar with the method, there may seem to be a potential for amputation of the head of the penis, but actually there virtually is no risk, as an indentation on the penile side of the clamp protects the penile head.

The PlastiBell device is very easy to use but must stay on until the foreskin becomes necrotic and the bell and foreskin fall off on their own—a process that takes 7 to 10 days. Many parents dislike this method because its final result is not immediate and they have to contend with a medical implement during their newborn’s first week home.

Electrocautery is not recommended. Some clinicians, especially urologists, use electrocautery as the cutting mechanism for circumcision. A review of the literature, however, reveals that electrocautery has not been studied head-to-head against traditional techniques, and that various significant complications—transected penile head, severe burns, meatal stenosis—have been reported.11,12 It is certainly not a mainstream procedure for neonatal circumcision.

Evaluate penile anatomy for abnormalities

Before performing any circumcision, the head of the penis should be examined to rule out hypospadias or other penile abnormalities. This is because the foreskin is utilized in certain penile repair procedures. The pediatrician should perform an initial examination of the penis at the formal newborn physical within 24 hours of delivery. The clinician performing the circumcision should re-examine the penis just before the procedure is begun—by pushing back the foreskin as much as possible—as well as during the procedure, once the foreskin is lifted off the penile head but before the foreskin is excised.

 

Read about how to ensure the best outcome of circumcision.

 

 

5. When is the best time to perform a circumcision?

The medical literature provides no firm answer to this question. The younger the baby, the easier it is to perform a circumcision as a simple procedure with local anesthesia. The older the baby, the larger the penis and the more aware the baby will be of his surroundings. Both these factors will make the procedure more difficult.

Most clinicians would be reluctant to perform a circumcision in the office or clinic after the baby is 6 to 8 weeks old. If a family desires their son to be circumcised after that time—or a medical condition precludes earlier circumcision—the procedure is best performed by a pediatric urologist in the operating room.

 

Related article:
Circumcision accident: $1.3M verdict

 

6. What are the potential complications of circumcision?

The rate of circumcision complications is very low: 0.2%.13 That being said, the 3 most common types of complications are postoperative bleeding, infection, and damage to the penis.

Far and away the most common complication is postoperative bleeding , usually at the frenulum of the head of the penis (the 6 o’clock position). In most cases, the bleeding is light to moderate. It is controlled with direct pressure applied for several minutes, the use of processed gelatin (Gelfoam) or cellulose (Surgicel), sparing use of silver nitrate, or placement of a polyglycolic acid (Vicryl) 5-0 suture.

Infection, an unusual occurrence, is seen within 24 to 72 hours after circumcision. It is marked by swelling, redness, and a foul-smelling mucus discharge. This discharge must be differentiated from dried fibrin, which is commonly seen on the head of the penis in the days after circumcision but has no odor or association with erythema, fever, or infant fussiness. True infection should be treated, in collaboration with the child’s pediatrician, with a staphylococcal-sensitive penicillin (such as dicloxacillin).

More serious is damage to the penis, which ranges from accidental dilation of the meatus to partial amputation of the penile glans. Any such injury should immediately prompt a consultation with a pediatric urologist.

More of a nuisance than a complication is the sliding of the penile shaft’s skin up and over the glans. This is a relatively frequent occurrence after normal, successful circumcisions. Parents of an affected newborn should be instructed to gently slide the skin back until the head of the penis is completely exposed again. After several days, the skin will adhere to its proper position on the shaft.

Take steps to ensure the best circumcision outcome
  • Just before the procedure, have a face-to-face discussion with the parents. Confirm that they want the circumcision done, explain exactly what it entails, and let them know they will receive complete aftercare instructions.
  • Make sure one of the parents signs the consent form.
  • Circumcise the right baby! Check the identification bracelet and confirm that the newborn’s hospital and chart numbers match.
  • Prevent excessive hip movement by securing the baby's legs. The usual solution is a specially designed plastic restraint board with Velcro straps for the legs.
  • Examine the infant’s penile anatomy prior to the procedure to make certain it is normal.
  • For pain relief, administer enough analgesia, as either dorsal nerve block or penile ring block (the best methods). Before injection, draw the plunger of the syringe back to make certain that the needle is not in a blood vessel.
  • During the procedure, make sure the entire membranous layer of foreskin covering the head of the penis is separated from the glans.
  • Watch the penis for several minutes after the circumcision to make sure there is no bleeding.

7. What is a Jewish ritual circumcision?

For their newborn’s circumcision, Jewish parents may choose a bris ceremony, formally called a brit milah, in fulfillment of religious tradition. The ceremony involves a brief religious service, circumcision with the traditional Mogen clamp, a special blessing, and an official religious naming rite. The bris traditionally is performed by a mohel, a rabbi or other religious official trained in circumcision. Many parents have the bris done by a mohel who is a medical doctor. In the United States, the availability of both types of mohels varies.

8. Who should perform circumcisions—obstetricians or pediatricians?

The answer to this question depends on where you practice. In some communities or hospitals, the obstetrician performs newborn circumcision, while in other places the pediatrician does. In addition, depending on local circumstances or the specific population involved, circumcisions may be performed by a pediatric urologist, nurse practitioner, or even out of hospital by a trained religiously affiliated practitioner.

Obstetricians began doing circumcisions for 2 reasons. First, obstetricians are surgically trained whereas pediatricians are not. It was therefore thought to be more appropriate for obstetricians to do this minor surgical procedure. Second, circumcisions used to be done right in the delivery room shortly after delivery. It was thought that the crying induced by performing the circumcision helped clear the baby’s lungs and invigorated sluggish babies. Now, however, in-hospital circumcisions are usually done in the days following delivery, after the baby has had the opportunity to undergo his first physical examination to make sure that all is well and that the penile anatomy is normal.

Clinician experience, proper protocol contribute to a safe procedure

In the United States, a large percentage of male infants are circumcised. Although circumcision has known medical benefits, the procedure generally is performed for family, religious, or cultural reasons. Circumcision is a safe and straightforward procedure but has its risks and potential complications. As with most surgeries, the best outcomes are achieved by practitioners who are well trained, who perform the procedure under supervision until their experience is sufficient, and who follow correct protocol during the entire operation.

 

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

References
  1. Dallas ME. The 10 most common surgeries in the US. Healthgrades website. https://www.healthgrades.com/explore/the-10-most-common-surgeries-in-the-us. Reviewed August 15, 2017. Accessed October 2, 2017.
  2. Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman EW. Circumcision in the United States: prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practice. JAMA. 1997;277(13):1052–1057.
  3. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Male circumcision. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):e756–e785.
  4. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):585–586.
  5. Morris BJ, Krieger JN. Does male circumcision affect sexual function, sensitivity, or satisfaction? A systematic review. J Sex Med. 2013;10(11):2644–2657.
  6. Howard FM, Howard CR, Fortune K, Generelli P, Zolnoun D, tenHoopen C. A randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of EMLA and dorsal penile nerve block for pain relief during neonatal circumcision. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998;5(4):196.
  7. Taddio A, Stevens B, Craig K, et al. Efficacy and safety of lidocaine-prilocaine cream for pain during circumcision. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(17):1197–1201.
  8. Lander J, Brady-Fryer B, Metcalfe JB, Nazarali S, Muttitt S. Comparison of ring block, dorsal penile nerve block, and topical anesthesia for neonatal circumcision: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;278(24):2157–2162.
  9. Hardwick-Smith S, Mastrobattista JM, Wallace PA, Ritchey ML. Ring block for neonatal circumcision. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91(6):930–934.
  10. Kaufman GE, Cimo S, Miller LW, Blass EM. An evaluation of the effects of sucrose on neonatal pain with 2 commonly used circumcision methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(3):564–568.
  11. Tucker SC, Cerqueiro J, Sterne GD, Bracka A. Circumcision: a refined technique and 5 year review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001;83(2):121–125.
  12. Fraser ID, Tjoe J. Circumcision using bipolar scissors can be a safe and simple operation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000;82(3):190–191.
  13. Wiswell TE, Geschke DW. Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcised boys. Pediatrics. 1989;83(6):1011–1015.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Lerner is Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

The author reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Issue
OBG Management - 30(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
27-31
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Lerner is Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

The author reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Lerner is Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

The author reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Article PDF
Article PDF

In the United States, circumcision is the fourth most common surgical procedure—behind cataract removal, cesarean delivery, and joint replacement.1 This operation, which dates to ancient times, is chosen for medical, personal, or religious reasons. It is performed on 77% of males born in the United States and on 42% of those born elsewhere who are living in this country.2 Whether it is performed depends not only on the parents’ race, ethnic background, and religion but also on region: US circumcision rates range from 74% in the Midwest to 30% in the West, and in between are the Northeast (67%) and the South (61%).3

Circumcision is not without controversy. Some claim that it is unnecessary cosmetic surgery, that it is genital mutilation, that the patient cannot choose it or object to it, or that it decreases sexual satisfaction.

In this article, I review 8 common questions about circumcision and provide data-based answers to them.

1. Should a newborn be circumcised?

For many years, the medical benefits of circumcision were scientifically ambiguous. With no clear answers, some thought that parents should base their decision for or against circumcision not on any potential medical benefit but rather on their family or religious tradition, or on a social standard, that is, what the majority of families in their community do.

Over the past 20 years, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated real medical benefits of circumcision. In 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), which previously had been neutral on the subject, issued a task force report concluding that the health benefits of circumcision outweigh its risks and justify access to the procedure.3,4 However, the report stopped short of recommending circumcision.

Opponents have expressed several concerns about circumcision. First, they say, it is painful and unnecessary, and performing it when life has just begun takes the decision away from the adult-to-be, who may want to be uncircumcised as an adult but will have no recourse. Second, they say circumcision will diminish the adult’s sexual pleasure. However, there is no proof this occurs, and it is unclear how the claim could be adequately verified.5

Health benefits of circumcision3


  • Prevention of phimosis and balanoposthitis (inflammation of glans and foreskin), penile retraction disorders, and penile cancer
  • Fewer infant urinary tract infections
  • Decreased spread of human papillomavirus–related disease, including cervical cancer and its precursors, to sexual partners
  • Lower risk of acquiring, harboring, and spreading human immunodeficiency virus infection, herpes virus infection, and other sexually transmitted diseases
  • Easier genital hygiene
  • No need for circumcision later in life, when the procedure is more involved

2. What is the best analgesia for circumcision?

Although in decades past circumcision was often performed without any analgesia, in the United States analgesia is now standard of care. The AAP Task Force on Circumcision formalized this standard in a 2012 policy statement.4 For newborn circumcision, analgesia can be given in the form of analgesic cream, penile ring block, or dorsal nerve block.

Analgesic EMLA cream (a mixture of local anesthetics such as lidocaine 2.5%/prilocaine 2.5%) is easy to use but is minimally effective in relieving circumcision pain,6 although some investigators have reported it is efficacious compared with placebo.7 When used, the analgesic cream is applied 30 to 60 minutes before circumcision.

Both penile ring block and dorsal nerve block with 1% lidocaine are easy to administer and are very effective.8,9 They are best used with buffered lidocaine, which partially relieves the burning that occurs with injection. With both methods, the smaller the needle used (preferably 30 gauge), the better.

These 2 block methods have different injection sites. For the ring block, small amounts of lidocaine (1 to 1.5 mL) are given in a series of injections around the entire circumference of the base of the penis. The dorsal block targets the 2 dorsal nerves located at 10 o’clock and 2 o’clock at the base of the penis. Epinephrine, given its vasoconstrictive properties and the potential for necrosis, should never be used with local analgesia for penile infiltration.

Analgesia can be supplemented with comfort measures, such as a pacifier, sugar water, gentle rubbing on the forehead, and soothing speech.10

 

Related article:
Circumcision impedes viral disease. Will opposition fade?

 

3. What conditions are required for safe circumcision?

As circumcision is not medically required and need not occur in the days immediately after birth, it should be performed only when conditions are optimal:

  • A pediatrician or other practitioner must first examine the newborn.
  • The newborn must be full-term, healthy, and stable.
    • The best time to circumcise a baby born prematurely is right before discharge from the intensive care nursery.
  • The penis must be of normal size and without anatomical defect—no micropenis, hypospadias, or penoscrotal webbing.
  • The lower abdominal fat pad must not be so large that it will cause the shaft’s skin to cover the exposed penile head.
  • If there is a family history of a bleeding disorder, the newborn must be evaluated for the disorder before the circumcision.
  • The newborn must have received his vitamin K shot.

4. What is the best circumcision method?

Circumcision can be performed with the Gomco circumcision clamp, the Mogen circumcision clamp, or the PlastiBell circumcision device. Each device works well, provides excellent results, and has its pluses and minuses. Practitioners should use the device with which they are most familiar and comfortable, which likely will be the device they used in training.

In the United States, the Gomco clamp is perhaps the most commonly used device. It provides good cosmetic results, and its metal “bell” protects the entire head of the penis. Of the 3 methods, however, it is the most difficult—the partially cut foreskin must be threaded between the bell and the clamp frame before the clamp is tightened. In many cases, too, there is bleeding at the penile frenulum.

The Mogen clamp, another commonly used device, also is used in traditional Jewish circumcisions. Of the 3 methods, it is the quickest, produces the best hemostasis, and is associated with the least discomfort.10 To those unfamiliar with the method, there may seem to be a potential for amputation of the head of the penis, but actually there virtually is no risk, as an indentation on the penile side of the clamp protects the penile head.

The PlastiBell device is very easy to use but must stay on until the foreskin becomes necrotic and the bell and foreskin fall off on their own—a process that takes 7 to 10 days. Many parents dislike this method because its final result is not immediate and they have to contend with a medical implement during their newborn’s first week home.

Electrocautery is not recommended. Some clinicians, especially urologists, use electrocautery as the cutting mechanism for circumcision. A review of the literature, however, reveals that electrocautery has not been studied head-to-head against traditional techniques, and that various significant complications—transected penile head, severe burns, meatal stenosis—have been reported.11,12 It is certainly not a mainstream procedure for neonatal circumcision.

Evaluate penile anatomy for abnormalities

Before performing any circumcision, the head of the penis should be examined to rule out hypospadias or other penile abnormalities. This is because the foreskin is utilized in certain penile repair procedures. The pediatrician should perform an initial examination of the penis at the formal newborn physical within 24 hours of delivery. The clinician performing the circumcision should re-examine the penis just before the procedure is begun—by pushing back the foreskin as much as possible—as well as during the procedure, once the foreskin is lifted off the penile head but before the foreskin is excised.

 

Read about how to ensure the best outcome of circumcision.

 

 

5. When is the best time to perform a circumcision?

The medical literature provides no firm answer to this question. The younger the baby, the easier it is to perform a circumcision as a simple procedure with local anesthesia. The older the baby, the larger the penis and the more aware the baby will be of his surroundings. Both these factors will make the procedure more difficult.

Most clinicians would be reluctant to perform a circumcision in the office or clinic after the baby is 6 to 8 weeks old. If a family desires their son to be circumcised after that time—or a medical condition precludes earlier circumcision—the procedure is best performed by a pediatric urologist in the operating room.

 

Related article:
Circumcision accident: $1.3M verdict

 

6. What are the potential complications of circumcision?

The rate of circumcision complications is very low: 0.2%.13 That being said, the 3 most common types of complications are postoperative bleeding, infection, and damage to the penis.

Far and away the most common complication is postoperative bleeding , usually at the frenulum of the head of the penis (the 6 o’clock position). In most cases, the bleeding is light to moderate. It is controlled with direct pressure applied for several minutes, the use of processed gelatin (Gelfoam) or cellulose (Surgicel), sparing use of silver nitrate, or placement of a polyglycolic acid (Vicryl) 5-0 suture.

Infection, an unusual occurrence, is seen within 24 to 72 hours after circumcision. It is marked by swelling, redness, and a foul-smelling mucus discharge. This discharge must be differentiated from dried fibrin, which is commonly seen on the head of the penis in the days after circumcision but has no odor or association with erythema, fever, or infant fussiness. True infection should be treated, in collaboration with the child’s pediatrician, with a staphylococcal-sensitive penicillin (such as dicloxacillin).

More serious is damage to the penis, which ranges from accidental dilation of the meatus to partial amputation of the penile glans. Any such injury should immediately prompt a consultation with a pediatric urologist.

More of a nuisance than a complication is the sliding of the penile shaft’s skin up and over the glans. This is a relatively frequent occurrence after normal, successful circumcisions. Parents of an affected newborn should be instructed to gently slide the skin back until the head of the penis is completely exposed again. After several days, the skin will adhere to its proper position on the shaft.

Take steps to ensure the best circumcision outcome
  • Just before the procedure, have a face-to-face discussion with the parents. Confirm that they want the circumcision done, explain exactly what it entails, and let them know they will receive complete aftercare instructions.
  • Make sure one of the parents signs the consent form.
  • Circumcise the right baby! Check the identification bracelet and confirm that the newborn’s hospital and chart numbers match.
  • Prevent excessive hip movement by securing the baby's legs. The usual solution is a specially designed plastic restraint board with Velcro straps for the legs.
  • Examine the infant’s penile anatomy prior to the procedure to make certain it is normal.
  • For pain relief, administer enough analgesia, as either dorsal nerve block or penile ring block (the best methods). Before injection, draw the plunger of the syringe back to make certain that the needle is not in a blood vessel.
  • During the procedure, make sure the entire membranous layer of foreskin covering the head of the penis is separated from the glans.
  • Watch the penis for several minutes after the circumcision to make sure there is no bleeding.

7. What is a Jewish ritual circumcision?

For their newborn’s circumcision, Jewish parents may choose a bris ceremony, formally called a brit milah, in fulfillment of religious tradition. The ceremony involves a brief religious service, circumcision with the traditional Mogen clamp, a special blessing, and an official religious naming rite. The bris traditionally is performed by a mohel, a rabbi or other religious official trained in circumcision. Many parents have the bris done by a mohel who is a medical doctor. In the United States, the availability of both types of mohels varies.

8. Who should perform circumcisions—obstetricians or pediatricians?

The answer to this question depends on where you practice. In some communities or hospitals, the obstetrician performs newborn circumcision, while in other places the pediatrician does. In addition, depending on local circumstances or the specific population involved, circumcisions may be performed by a pediatric urologist, nurse practitioner, or even out of hospital by a trained religiously affiliated practitioner.

Obstetricians began doing circumcisions for 2 reasons. First, obstetricians are surgically trained whereas pediatricians are not. It was therefore thought to be more appropriate for obstetricians to do this minor surgical procedure. Second, circumcisions used to be done right in the delivery room shortly after delivery. It was thought that the crying induced by performing the circumcision helped clear the baby’s lungs and invigorated sluggish babies. Now, however, in-hospital circumcisions are usually done in the days following delivery, after the baby has had the opportunity to undergo his first physical examination to make sure that all is well and that the penile anatomy is normal.

Clinician experience, proper protocol contribute to a safe procedure

In the United States, a large percentage of male infants are circumcised. Although circumcision has known medical benefits, the procedure generally is performed for family, religious, or cultural reasons. Circumcision is a safe and straightforward procedure but has its risks and potential complications. As with most surgeries, the best outcomes are achieved by practitioners who are well trained, who perform the procedure under supervision until their experience is sufficient, and who follow correct protocol during the entire operation.

 

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

In the United States, circumcision is the fourth most common surgical procedure—behind cataract removal, cesarean delivery, and joint replacement.1 This operation, which dates to ancient times, is chosen for medical, personal, or religious reasons. It is performed on 77% of males born in the United States and on 42% of those born elsewhere who are living in this country.2 Whether it is performed depends not only on the parents’ race, ethnic background, and religion but also on region: US circumcision rates range from 74% in the Midwest to 30% in the West, and in between are the Northeast (67%) and the South (61%).3

Circumcision is not without controversy. Some claim that it is unnecessary cosmetic surgery, that it is genital mutilation, that the patient cannot choose it or object to it, or that it decreases sexual satisfaction.

In this article, I review 8 common questions about circumcision and provide data-based answers to them.

1. Should a newborn be circumcised?

For many years, the medical benefits of circumcision were scientifically ambiguous. With no clear answers, some thought that parents should base their decision for or against circumcision not on any potential medical benefit but rather on their family or religious tradition, or on a social standard, that is, what the majority of families in their community do.

Over the past 20 years, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated real medical benefits of circumcision. In 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), which previously had been neutral on the subject, issued a task force report concluding that the health benefits of circumcision outweigh its risks and justify access to the procedure.3,4 However, the report stopped short of recommending circumcision.

Opponents have expressed several concerns about circumcision. First, they say, it is painful and unnecessary, and performing it when life has just begun takes the decision away from the adult-to-be, who may want to be uncircumcised as an adult but will have no recourse. Second, they say circumcision will diminish the adult’s sexual pleasure. However, there is no proof this occurs, and it is unclear how the claim could be adequately verified.5

Health benefits of circumcision3


  • Prevention of phimosis and balanoposthitis (inflammation of glans and foreskin), penile retraction disorders, and penile cancer
  • Fewer infant urinary tract infections
  • Decreased spread of human papillomavirus–related disease, including cervical cancer and its precursors, to sexual partners
  • Lower risk of acquiring, harboring, and spreading human immunodeficiency virus infection, herpes virus infection, and other sexually transmitted diseases
  • Easier genital hygiene
  • No need for circumcision later in life, when the procedure is more involved

2. What is the best analgesia for circumcision?

Although in decades past circumcision was often performed without any analgesia, in the United States analgesia is now standard of care. The AAP Task Force on Circumcision formalized this standard in a 2012 policy statement.4 For newborn circumcision, analgesia can be given in the form of analgesic cream, penile ring block, or dorsal nerve block.

Analgesic EMLA cream (a mixture of local anesthetics such as lidocaine 2.5%/prilocaine 2.5%) is easy to use but is minimally effective in relieving circumcision pain,6 although some investigators have reported it is efficacious compared with placebo.7 When used, the analgesic cream is applied 30 to 60 minutes before circumcision.

Both penile ring block and dorsal nerve block with 1% lidocaine are easy to administer and are very effective.8,9 They are best used with buffered lidocaine, which partially relieves the burning that occurs with injection. With both methods, the smaller the needle used (preferably 30 gauge), the better.

These 2 block methods have different injection sites. For the ring block, small amounts of lidocaine (1 to 1.5 mL) are given in a series of injections around the entire circumference of the base of the penis. The dorsal block targets the 2 dorsal nerves located at 10 o’clock and 2 o’clock at the base of the penis. Epinephrine, given its vasoconstrictive properties and the potential for necrosis, should never be used with local analgesia for penile infiltration.

Analgesia can be supplemented with comfort measures, such as a pacifier, sugar water, gentle rubbing on the forehead, and soothing speech.10

 

Related article:
Circumcision impedes viral disease. Will opposition fade?

 

3. What conditions are required for safe circumcision?

As circumcision is not medically required and need not occur in the days immediately after birth, it should be performed only when conditions are optimal:

  • A pediatrician or other practitioner must first examine the newborn.
  • The newborn must be full-term, healthy, and stable.
    • The best time to circumcise a baby born prematurely is right before discharge from the intensive care nursery.
  • The penis must be of normal size and without anatomical defect—no micropenis, hypospadias, or penoscrotal webbing.
  • The lower abdominal fat pad must not be so large that it will cause the shaft’s skin to cover the exposed penile head.
  • If there is a family history of a bleeding disorder, the newborn must be evaluated for the disorder before the circumcision.
  • The newborn must have received his vitamin K shot.

4. What is the best circumcision method?

Circumcision can be performed with the Gomco circumcision clamp, the Mogen circumcision clamp, or the PlastiBell circumcision device. Each device works well, provides excellent results, and has its pluses and minuses. Practitioners should use the device with which they are most familiar and comfortable, which likely will be the device they used in training.

In the United States, the Gomco clamp is perhaps the most commonly used device. It provides good cosmetic results, and its metal “bell” protects the entire head of the penis. Of the 3 methods, however, it is the most difficult—the partially cut foreskin must be threaded between the bell and the clamp frame before the clamp is tightened. In many cases, too, there is bleeding at the penile frenulum.

The Mogen clamp, another commonly used device, also is used in traditional Jewish circumcisions. Of the 3 methods, it is the quickest, produces the best hemostasis, and is associated with the least discomfort.10 To those unfamiliar with the method, there may seem to be a potential for amputation of the head of the penis, but actually there virtually is no risk, as an indentation on the penile side of the clamp protects the penile head.

The PlastiBell device is very easy to use but must stay on until the foreskin becomes necrotic and the bell and foreskin fall off on their own—a process that takes 7 to 10 days. Many parents dislike this method because its final result is not immediate and they have to contend with a medical implement during their newborn’s first week home.

Electrocautery is not recommended. Some clinicians, especially urologists, use electrocautery as the cutting mechanism for circumcision. A review of the literature, however, reveals that electrocautery has not been studied head-to-head against traditional techniques, and that various significant complications—transected penile head, severe burns, meatal stenosis—have been reported.11,12 It is certainly not a mainstream procedure for neonatal circumcision.

Evaluate penile anatomy for abnormalities

Before performing any circumcision, the head of the penis should be examined to rule out hypospadias or other penile abnormalities. This is because the foreskin is utilized in certain penile repair procedures. The pediatrician should perform an initial examination of the penis at the formal newborn physical within 24 hours of delivery. The clinician performing the circumcision should re-examine the penis just before the procedure is begun—by pushing back the foreskin as much as possible—as well as during the procedure, once the foreskin is lifted off the penile head but before the foreskin is excised.

 

Read about how to ensure the best outcome of circumcision.

 

 

5. When is the best time to perform a circumcision?

The medical literature provides no firm answer to this question. The younger the baby, the easier it is to perform a circumcision as a simple procedure with local anesthesia. The older the baby, the larger the penis and the more aware the baby will be of his surroundings. Both these factors will make the procedure more difficult.

Most clinicians would be reluctant to perform a circumcision in the office or clinic after the baby is 6 to 8 weeks old. If a family desires their son to be circumcised after that time—or a medical condition precludes earlier circumcision—the procedure is best performed by a pediatric urologist in the operating room.

 

Related article:
Circumcision accident: $1.3M verdict

 

6. What are the potential complications of circumcision?

The rate of circumcision complications is very low: 0.2%.13 That being said, the 3 most common types of complications are postoperative bleeding, infection, and damage to the penis.

Far and away the most common complication is postoperative bleeding , usually at the frenulum of the head of the penis (the 6 o’clock position). In most cases, the bleeding is light to moderate. It is controlled with direct pressure applied for several minutes, the use of processed gelatin (Gelfoam) or cellulose (Surgicel), sparing use of silver nitrate, or placement of a polyglycolic acid (Vicryl) 5-0 suture.

Infection, an unusual occurrence, is seen within 24 to 72 hours after circumcision. It is marked by swelling, redness, and a foul-smelling mucus discharge. This discharge must be differentiated from dried fibrin, which is commonly seen on the head of the penis in the days after circumcision but has no odor or association with erythema, fever, or infant fussiness. True infection should be treated, in collaboration with the child’s pediatrician, with a staphylococcal-sensitive penicillin (such as dicloxacillin).

More serious is damage to the penis, which ranges from accidental dilation of the meatus to partial amputation of the penile glans. Any such injury should immediately prompt a consultation with a pediatric urologist.

More of a nuisance than a complication is the sliding of the penile shaft’s skin up and over the glans. This is a relatively frequent occurrence after normal, successful circumcisions. Parents of an affected newborn should be instructed to gently slide the skin back until the head of the penis is completely exposed again. After several days, the skin will adhere to its proper position on the shaft.

Take steps to ensure the best circumcision outcome
  • Just before the procedure, have a face-to-face discussion with the parents. Confirm that they want the circumcision done, explain exactly what it entails, and let them know they will receive complete aftercare instructions.
  • Make sure one of the parents signs the consent form.
  • Circumcise the right baby! Check the identification bracelet and confirm that the newborn’s hospital and chart numbers match.
  • Prevent excessive hip movement by securing the baby's legs. The usual solution is a specially designed plastic restraint board with Velcro straps for the legs.
  • Examine the infant’s penile anatomy prior to the procedure to make certain it is normal.
  • For pain relief, administer enough analgesia, as either dorsal nerve block or penile ring block (the best methods). Before injection, draw the plunger of the syringe back to make certain that the needle is not in a blood vessel.
  • During the procedure, make sure the entire membranous layer of foreskin covering the head of the penis is separated from the glans.
  • Watch the penis for several minutes after the circumcision to make sure there is no bleeding.

7. What is a Jewish ritual circumcision?

For their newborn’s circumcision, Jewish parents may choose a bris ceremony, formally called a brit milah, in fulfillment of religious tradition. The ceremony involves a brief religious service, circumcision with the traditional Mogen clamp, a special blessing, and an official religious naming rite. The bris traditionally is performed by a mohel, a rabbi or other religious official trained in circumcision. Many parents have the bris done by a mohel who is a medical doctor. In the United States, the availability of both types of mohels varies.

8. Who should perform circumcisions—obstetricians or pediatricians?

The answer to this question depends on where you practice. In some communities or hospitals, the obstetrician performs newborn circumcision, while in other places the pediatrician does. In addition, depending on local circumstances or the specific population involved, circumcisions may be performed by a pediatric urologist, nurse practitioner, or even out of hospital by a trained religiously affiliated practitioner.

Obstetricians began doing circumcisions for 2 reasons. First, obstetricians are surgically trained whereas pediatricians are not. It was therefore thought to be more appropriate for obstetricians to do this minor surgical procedure. Second, circumcisions used to be done right in the delivery room shortly after delivery. It was thought that the crying induced by performing the circumcision helped clear the baby’s lungs and invigorated sluggish babies. Now, however, in-hospital circumcisions are usually done in the days following delivery, after the baby has had the opportunity to undergo his first physical examination to make sure that all is well and that the penile anatomy is normal.

Clinician experience, proper protocol contribute to a safe procedure

In the United States, a large percentage of male infants are circumcised. Although circumcision has known medical benefits, the procedure generally is performed for family, religious, or cultural reasons. Circumcision is a safe and straightforward procedure but has its risks and potential complications. As with most surgeries, the best outcomes are achieved by practitioners who are well trained, who perform the procedure under supervision until their experience is sufficient, and who follow correct protocol during the entire operation.

 

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

References
  1. Dallas ME. The 10 most common surgeries in the US. Healthgrades website. https://www.healthgrades.com/explore/the-10-most-common-surgeries-in-the-us. Reviewed August 15, 2017. Accessed October 2, 2017.
  2. Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman EW. Circumcision in the United States: prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practice. JAMA. 1997;277(13):1052–1057.
  3. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Male circumcision. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):e756–e785.
  4. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):585–586.
  5. Morris BJ, Krieger JN. Does male circumcision affect sexual function, sensitivity, or satisfaction? A systematic review. J Sex Med. 2013;10(11):2644–2657.
  6. Howard FM, Howard CR, Fortune K, Generelli P, Zolnoun D, tenHoopen C. A randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of EMLA and dorsal penile nerve block for pain relief during neonatal circumcision. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998;5(4):196.
  7. Taddio A, Stevens B, Craig K, et al. Efficacy and safety of lidocaine-prilocaine cream for pain during circumcision. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(17):1197–1201.
  8. Lander J, Brady-Fryer B, Metcalfe JB, Nazarali S, Muttitt S. Comparison of ring block, dorsal penile nerve block, and topical anesthesia for neonatal circumcision: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;278(24):2157–2162.
  9. Hardwick-Smith S, Mastrobattista JM, Wallace PA, Ritchey ML. Ring block for neonatal circumcision. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91(6):930–934.
  10. Kaufman GE, Cimo S, Miller LW, Blass EM. An evaluation of the effects of sucrose on neonatal pain with 2 commonly used circumcision methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(3):564–568.
  11. Tucker SC, Cerqueiro J, Sterne GD, Bracka A. Circumcision: a refined technique and 5 year review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001;83(2):121–125.
  12. Fraser ID, Tjoe J. Circumcision using bipolar scissors can be a safe and simple operation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000;82(3):190–191.
  13. Wiswell TE, Geschke DW. Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcised boys. Pediatrics. 1989;83(6):1011–1015.
References
  1. Dallas ME. The 10 most common surgeries in the US. Healthgrades website. https://www.healthgrades.com/explore/the-10-most-common-surgeries-in-the-us. Reviewed August 15, 2017. Accessed October 2, 2017.
  2. Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman EW. Circumcision in the United States: prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practice. JAMA. 1997;277(13):1052–1057.
  3. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Male circumcision. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):e756–e785.
  4. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):585–586.
  5. Morris BJ, Krieger JN. Does male circumcision affect sexual function, sensitivity, or satisfaction? A systematic review. J Sex Med. 2013;10(11):2644–2657.
  6. Howard FM, Howard CR, Fortune K, Generelli P, Zolnoun D, tenHoopen C. A randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of EMLA and dorsal penile nerve block for pain relief during neonatal circumcision. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998;5(4):196.
  7. Taddio A, Stevens B, Craig K, et al. Efficacy and safety of lidocaine-prilocaine cream for pain during circumcision. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(17):1197–1201.
  8. Lander J, Brady-Fryer B, Metcalfe JB, Nazarali S, Muttitt S. Comparison of ring block, dorsal penile nerve block, and topical anesthesia for neonatal circumcision: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;278(24):2157–2162.
  9. Hardwick-Smith S, Mastrobattista JM, Wallace PA, Ritchey ML. Ring block for neonatal circumcision. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91(6):930–934.
  10. Kaufman GE, Cimo S, Miller LW, Blass EM. An evaluation of the effects of sucrose on neonatal pain with 2 commonly used circumcision methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(3):564–568.
  11. Tucker SC, Cerqueiro J, Sterne GD, Bracka A. Circumcision: a refined technique and 5 year review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001;83(2):121–125.
  12. Fraser ID, Tjoe J. Circumcision using bipolar scissors can be a safe and simple operation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000;82(3):190–191.
  13. Wiswell TE, Geschke DW. Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcised boys. Pediatrics. 1989;83(6):1011–1015.
Issue
OBG Management - 30(1)
Issue
OBG Management - 30(1)
Page Number
27-31
Page Number
27-31
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
8 common questions about newborn circumcision
Display Headline
8 common questions about newborn circumcision
Sections
Citation Override
OBG Manag. 2018 January;30(1):27-31. Published online October 13, 2017.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article PDF Media

Choosing location after discharge wisely

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/14/2018 - 11:55
A novel, important skill for the inpatient team

 

Of all the care decisions we make during a hospital stay, perhaps the one with the biggest implications for cost and quality is the one determining the location to which we send the patient after discharge.

Yet ironically, we haven’t typically participated in this decision, but instead have left it up to case managers and others to work with patients to determine discharge location. This is a missed opportunity, as patients first look to their doctor for guidance on this decision. Absent such guidance, they turn to other care team members for the conversation. With a principal focus on hospital length of stay, we have prioritized when patients are ready to leave over where they go after they leave.

Dr. Win Whitcomb
Discharge location has a large impact on quality and cost. The hazards of going to a postacute facility are similar to the hazards of hospitalization – delirium, falls, infection, and deconditioning are well-documented adverse effects. We may invoke the argument that, all things being equal, a facility is safer than home. Yet, there is scant evidence supporting this assertion. At the same time, when contemplating a home discharge, a capable caregiver is often in short supply, and patients requiring assistance may have few options but to go to a facility.

In terms of cost during hospitalization and for the 30 days after discharge, for common conditions such as pneumonia, heart failure, COPD, or major joint replacement, Medicare spends nearly as much on postacute care – home health, skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation, long-term acute care hospitals – as for hospital care.1 Further, an Institute of Medicine analysis showed that geographic variation in postacute care spending is responsible for three-quarters of all variation in Medicare spending.2 Such variation raises questions about the rigor with which postacute care decisions are made by hospital teams.

Perhaps most striking of all, hospitalist care (versus that of traditional primary care providers) has been associated with excess discharge rates to skilled nursing facilities, and savings that accrue under hospitalists during hospitalization are more than outweighed by spending on care during the postacute period.3

All of this leads me to my point: Hospitalists and inpatient teams need a defined process for selecting the most appropriate discharge location. Such a location should ideally be the least restrictive location suitable for a patient’s needs. In the box below, I propose a framework for the process. The domains listed in the box should be evaluated and discussed by the team, with early input and final approval by the patient and caregiver(s). The domains listed are not intended to be an exhaustive list, but rather to serve as the basis for discussion during discharge team rounds.

Identifying patient factors informing an optimal discharge location may represent a new skill set for many hospitalists and underscores the value of collaboration with team members who can provide needed information. In April, the Society of Hospital Medicine published the Revised Core Competencies in Hospital Medicine. In the Care of the Older Patient section, the authors state that hospitalists should be able to “describe postacute care options that can enable older patients to regain functional capacity.”4 Inherent in this competency is an understanding of not only patient factors in postacute care location decisions, but also the differing capabilities of home health agencies, skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, and long-term acute care hospitals.
 

Dr. Whitcomb is chief medical officer at Remedy Partners in Darien, Conn., and cofounder and past president of the Society of Hospital Medicine. Contact him at [email protected].

References

1. Mechanic R. Post-acute care – the next frontier for controlling Medicare spending. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:692-4.

2. Newhouse JP, et al. Geographic variation in Medicare services. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1465-8.

3. Kuo YF, et al. Association of hospitalist care with medical utilization after discharge: evidence of cost shift from a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(3):152-9.

4. Nichani S, et al. Core Competencies in Hospital Medicine 2017 Revision. Section 3: Healthcare Systems. J Hosp Med. 2017 April;12(1):S55-S82.
 

Framework for Selecting Appropriate Discharge Location

Patient Independence

  • Can the patient perform activities of daily living?
  • Can the patient ambulate?
  • Is there cognitive impairment?

Caregiver Availability

  • If the patient needs it, is a caregiver who is capable and reliable available? If so, to what extent is s/he available?

Therapy Needs

  • Does the patient require PT, OT, and/or ST?
  • How much and for how long?
 

 

Skilled Nursing Needs

  • What, if anything, does the patient require in this area? For example, a new PEG tube, wound care, IV therapies, etc.

Social Factors

  • Is there access to transportation, food, and safe housing?

Home Factors

  • Are there stairs to enter the house or to get to the bedroom or bathroom?
  • Has the home been modified to accommodate special needs? Is the home inhabitable?
Publications
Topics
Sections
A novel, important skill for the inpatient team
A novel, important skill for the inpatient team

 

Of all the care decisions we make during a hospital stay, perhaps the one with the biggest implications for cost and quality is the one determining the location to which we send the patient after discharge.

Yet ironically, we haven’t typically participated in this decision, but instead have left it up to case managers and others to work with patients to determine discharge location. This is a missed opportunity, as patients first look to their doctor for guidance on this decision. Absent such guidance, they turn to other care team members for the conversation. With a principal focus on hospital length of stay, we have prioritized when patients are ready to leave over where they go after they leave.

Dr. Win Whitcomb
Discharge location has a large impact on quality and cost. The hazards of going to a postacute facility are similar to the hazards of hospitalization – delirium, falls, infection, and deconditioning are well-documented adverse effects. We may invoke the argument that, all things being equal, a facility is safer than home. Yet, there is scant evidence supporting this assertion. At the same time, when contemplating a home discharge, a capable caregiver is often in short supply, and patients requiring assistance may have few options but to go to a facility.

In terms of cost during hospitalization and for the 30 days after discharge, for common conditions such as pneumonia, heart failure, COPD, or major joint replacement, Medicare spends nearly as much on postacute care – home health, skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation, long-term acute care hospitals – as for hospital care.1 Further, an Institute of Medicine analysis showed that geographic variation in postacute care spending is responsible for three-quarters of all variation in Medicare spending.2 Such variation raises questions about the rigor with which postacute care decisions are made by hospital teams.

Perhaps most striking of all, hospitalist care (versus that of traditional primary care providers) has been associated with excess discharge rates to skilled nursing facilities, and savings that accrue under hospitalists during hospitalization are more than outweighed by spending on care during the postacute period.3

All of this leads me to my point: Hospitalists and inpatient teams need a defined process for selecting the most appropriate discharge location. Such a location should ideally be the least restrictive location suitable for a patient’s needs. In the box below, I propose a framework for the process. The domains listed in the box should be evaluated and discussed by the team, with early input and final approval by the patient and caregiver(s). The domains listed are not intended to be an exhaustive list, but rather to serve as the basis for discussion during discharge team rounds.

Identifying patient factors informing an optimal discharge location may represent a new skill set for many hospitalists and underscores the value of collaboration with team members who can provide needed information. In April, the Society of Hospital Medicine published the Revised Core Competencies in Hospital Medicine. In the Care of the Older Patient section, the authors state that hospitalists should be able to “describe postacute care options that can enable older patients to regain functional capacity.”4 Inherent in this competency is an understanding of not only patient factors in postacute care location decisions, but also the differing capabilities of home health agencies, skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, and long-term acute care hospitals.
 

Dr. Whitcomb is chief medical officer at Remedy Partners in Darien, Conn., and cofounder and past president of the Society of Hospital Medicine. Contact him at [email protected].

References

1. Mechanic R. Post-acute care – the next frontier for controlling Medicare spending. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:692-4.

2. Newhouse JP, et al. Geographic variation in Medicare services. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1465-8.

3. Kuo YF, et al. Association of hospitalist care with medical utilization after discharge: evidence of cost shift from a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(3):152-9.

4. Nichani S, et al. Core Competencies in Hospital Medicine 2017 Revision. Section 3: Healthcare Systems. J Hosp Med. 2017 April;12(1):S55-S82.
 

Framework for Selecting Appropriate Discharge Location

Patient Independence

  • Can the patient perform activities of daily living?
  • Can the patient ambulate?
  • Is there cognitive impairment?

Caregiver Availability

  • If the patient needs it, is a caregiver who is capable and reliable available? If so, to what extent is s/he available?

Therapy Needs

  • Does the patient require PT, OT, and/or ST?
  • How much and for how long?
 

 

Skilled Nursing Needs

  • What, if anything, does the patient require in this area? For example, a new PEG tube, wound care, IV therapies, etc.

Social Factors

  • Is there access to transportation, food, and safe housing?

Home Factors

  • Are there stairs to enter the house or to get to the bedroom or bathroom?
  • Has the home been modified to accommodate special needs? Is the home inhabitable?

 

Of all the care decisions we make during a hospital stay, perhaps the one with the biggest implications for cost and quality is the one determining the location to which we send the patient after discharge.

Yet ironically, we haven’t typically participated in this decision, but instead have left it up to case managers and others to work with patients to determine discharge location. This is a missed opportunity, as patients first look to their doctor for guidance on this decision. Absent such guidance, they turn to other care team members for the conversation. With a principal focus on hospital length of stay, we have prioritized when patients are ready to leave over where they go after they leave.

Dr. Win Whitcomb
Discharge location has a large impact on quality and cost. The hazards of going to a postacute facility are similar to the hazards of hospitalization – delirium, falls, infection, and deconditioning are well-documented adverse effects. We may invoke the argument that, all things being equal, a facility is safer than home. Yet, there is scant evidence supporting this assertion. At the same time, when contemplating a home discharge, a capable caregiver is often in short supply, and patients requiring assistance may have few options but to go to a facility.

In terms of cost during hospitalization and for the 30 days after discharge, for common conditions such as pneumonia, heart failure, COPD, or major joint replacement, Medicare spends nearly as much on postacute care – home health, skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation, long-term acute care hospitals – as for hospital care.1 Further, an Institute of Medicine analysis showed that geographic variation in postacute care spending is responsible for three-quarters of all variation in Medicare spending.2 Such variation raises questions about the rigor with which postacute care decisions are made by hospital teams.

Perhaps most striking of all, hospitalist care (versus that of traditional primary care providers) has been associated with excess discharge rates to skilled nursing facilities, and savings that accrue under hospitalists during hospitalization are more than outweighed by spending on care during the postacute period.3

All of this leads me to my point: Hospitalists and inpatient teams need a defined process for selecting the most appropriate discharge location. Such a location should ideally be the least restrictive location suitable for a patient’s needs. In the box below, I propose a framework for the process. The domains listed in the box should be evaluated and discussed by the team, with early input and final approval by the patient and caregiver(s). The domains listed are not intended to be an exhaustive list, but rather to serve as the basis for discussion during discharge team rounds.

Identifying patient factors informing an optimal discharge location may represent a new skill set for many hospitalists and underscores the value of collaboration with team members who can provide needed information. In April, the Society of Hospital Medicine published the Revised Core Competencies in Hospital Medicine. In the Care of the Older Patient section, the authors state that hospitalists should be able to “describe postacute care options that can enable older patients to regain functional capacity.”4 Inherent in this competency is an understanding of not only patient factors in postacute care location decisions, but also the differing capabilities of home health agencies, skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, and long-term acute care hospitals.
 

Dr. Whitcomb is chief medical officer at Remedy Partners in Darien, Conn., and cofounder and past president of the Society of Hospital Medicine. Contact him at [email protected].

References

1. Mechanic R. Post-acute care – the next frontier for controlling Medicare spending. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:692-4.

2. Newhouse JP, et al. Geographic variation in Medicare services. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1465-8.

3. Kuo YF, et al. Association of hospitalist care with medical utilization after discharge: evidence of cost shift from a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(3):152-9.

4. Nichani S, et al. Core Competencies in Hospital Medicine 2017 Revision. Section 3: Healthcare Systems. J Hosp Med. 2017 April;12(1):S55-S82.
 

Framework for Selecting Appropriate Discharge Location

Patient Independence

  • Can the patient perform activities of daily living?
  • Can the patient ambulate?
  • Is there cognitive impairment?

Caregiver Availability

  • If the patient needs it, is a caregiver who is capable and reliable available? If so, to what extent is s/he available?

Therapy Needs

  • Does the patient require PT, OT, and/or ST?
  • How much and for how long?
 

 

Skilled Nursing Needs

  • What, if anything, does the patient require in this area? For example, a new PEG tube, wound care, IV therapies, etc.

Social Factors

  • Is there access to transportation, food, and safe housing?

Home Factors

  • Are there stairs to enter the house or to get to the bedroom or bathroom?
  • Has the home been modified to accommodate special needs? Is the home inhabitable?
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

New and Noteworthy Information—January 2018

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/07/2019 - 10:37

Sleep Improves After Retirement

Transition to statutory retirement is associated with a decrease in sleep difficulties, especially waking up too early in the morning and nonrestorative sleep, according to a study published online ahead of print November 16, 2017, in Sleep. The study included 5,807 public sector employees who retired between 2000 and 2011. Participants were administered the Jenkins Sleep Problem Scale Questionnaire before and after retirement in surveys conducted every four years. At the last study wave before retirement, 30% of the participants had sleep difficulties. The risk ratio for having sleep difficulties in the first study wave following retirement, compared with the last study wave preceding retirement, was 0.89. The decreases in sleep difficulties occurred primarily among people with psychologic distress, suboptimal self-rated health, short sleep duration, and job strain before retirement.

Myllyntausta S, Salo P, Kronholm E, et al. Changes in sleep difficulties during the transition to statutory retirement. Sleep. 2017 Nov 16 [Epub ahead of print].

Vigorous Exercise May Delay Parkinson’s Disease Progression

High-intensity treadmill exercise may be feasible and prescribed safely for patients with Parkinson’s disease, according to a study published online ahead of print December 11, 2017, in JAMA Neurology. The randomized clinical trial included 128 participants between ages 40 and 80. Participants were at an early stage of the disease and not taking Parkinson’s disease medication. Investigators randomized the population to high-intensity exercise, moderate-intensity exercise, or a control condition. At baseline and six months, clinicians assessed the participants using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Participants in the study had a UPDRS score of about 20 at baseline. At six months, the high-intensity group’s score stayed at 20, and the moderate exercise group worsened by 1.5 points. The control group’s score worsened by three points.

Schenkman M, Moore CG, Kohrt WM, et al. Effect of high-intensity treadmill exercise on motor symptoms in patients with de novo Parkinson disease: a phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Dec 11 [Epub ahead of print].

Can Exposure to Terror Raise the Risk of Headache?

Exposure to terror increases the risk of persistent weekly and daily migraine and tension-type headache in adolescent survivors above expected levels, according to a study published online ahead of print December 13, 2017, in Neurology. Investigators interviewed 213 survivors of a terror attack in Norway. Half were male, the mean age was 17.7, and 13 survivors were severely injured. Participants provided information about their headache frequency four to five months after the attack. For each survivor, eight matched controls were drawn from the Young-HUNT3 Study. After exposure to terror, the odds ratio for migraine was 4.27, and that for tension-type headache was 3.39, as estimated in multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for injury, sex, age, family structure and economy, prior exposure to physical or sexual violence, and psychologic distress.

Stensland SØ, Zwart JA, Wentzel-Larsen T, Dyb G. The headache of terror: a matched cohort study of adolescents from the Utøya and the HUNT Study. Neurology. 2017 Dec 13 [Epub ahead of print].

Diet Reduces Disability and Symptoms of MS

A healthy diet and a composite healthy lifestyle are associated with less disability and symptom burden in multiple sclerosis (MS), according to a study published online ahead of print December 6, 2017, in Neurology. The study involved 6,989 people with MS who completed questionnaires about their diet as part of the North American Research Committee registry. The questionnaire estimated intake of fruits, vegetables and legumes, whole grains, added sugars, and red and processed meats. Researchers constructed an overall diet quality score for each individual based on the food groups. Participants with diet quality scores in the highest quintile had lower levels of disability and lower depression scores. Individuals reporting a composite healthy lifestyle had lower odds of reporting severe fatigue, depression, pain, or cognitive impairment.

Fitzgerald KC, Tyry T, Salter A, et al. Diet quality is associated with disability and symptom severity in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2017 Dec 6 [Epub ahead of print].

What Are the Effects of Childhood Convulsive Status Epilepticus?

Childhood convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is associated with substantial long-term neurologic morbidity, but primarily in people who have epilepsy, neurologic abnormalities, or both before the episode of CSE, according to a study published online ahead of print December 5, 2017, in Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. Researchers followed a population-based childhood CSE cohort. Of 203 survivors, 134 were assessed at a median follow-up of 8.9 years. Lasting neurologic conditions, including epilepsy, learning disabilities, and movement problems, were more common among participants than expected for children from the general population. Children who had existing neurologic or developmental issues at the time of CSE were more likely to have a neurologic problem at follow-up. Children without a neurologic or developmental issue tended to have better outcomes.

 

 

Pujar SS, Martinos MM, Cortina-Borja M, et al. Long-term prognosis after childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2017 Dec 5 [Epub ahead of print].

Protein Aggregation May Not Affect Cognition in Parkinson’s Disease

Patterns of cortical β-amyloid and tau do not differ between people with Parkinson’s disease who are cognitively normal (PD-CN), people with Parkinson’s disease with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI), and healthy older adults, according to a study published online ahead of print December 11, 2017, in JAMA Neurology. This cross-sectional study included 29 patients with Parkinson’s disease from a tertiary care medical center and research institutions. Imaging measures were compared with those of 49 healthy control participants. Outcomes were tau PET measurements of groups of patients with PD-CN and PD-MCI. Of the participants, 47 were female, and the mean age was 71.1. Voxelwise contrasts of whole-brain tau PET uptake between patients with PD-CN and patients with PD-MCI, and between patients with Parkinson’s disease and β-amyloid-negative controls, did not reveal significant differences.

Winer JR, Maass A, Pressman P, et al. Associations between tau, β-amyloid, and cognition in Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Dec 11 [Epub ahead of print].

Hormone Therapy Not Linked to Increased Stroke Risk

Postmenopausal hormone therapy is not associated with increased risk of stroke, provided that it is started early, according to a study published November 17 in PLoS Medicine. Researchers analyzed data on postmenopausal hormone therapy from five cohort studies including 88,914 women, combined with data from national registries on diagnoses and causes of death during a follow-up period. During a median follow-up of 14.3 years, 6,371 first-time stroke events (1,080 hemorrhagic) were recorded. Hormone therapy was not linked to increased risk of stroke if the therapy was initiated within five years of menopausal onset, regardless of means of administration, type of therapy, active substance, and treatment duration. In subanalyses, researchers observed an increase in risk for hemorrhagic stroke if the therapy contained the active substance conjugated equine estrogens.

Carrasquilla GD, Frumento P, Berglund A, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of stroke: a pooled analysis of data from population-based cohort studies. PLoS Med. 2017;14(11):e1002445.

Restless Sleep May Be Linked to Parkinson’s Disease

In patients with idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (IRBD), PET shows increased microglial activation in the substantia nigra, along with reduced dopaminergic function in the putamen, according to a study published in the October 2017 issue of Lancet Neurology. This prospective, case–control PET study included 20 patients with IRBD and no clinical evidence of parkinsonism and cognitive impairment recruited from tertiary sleep centers and 19 healthy controls. 11C-PK11195 binding was increased on the left side of the substantia nigra in patients with IRBD, compared with controls, but not on the right side. 11C-PK11195 binding was not significantly increased in the putamen and caudate of patients with IRBD. 18F-DOPA uptake was reduced in IRBD in the left putamen and right putamen, but not in the caudate.

Stokholm MG, Iranzo A, Østergaard K, et al. Assessment of neuroinflammation in patients with idiopathic rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder: a case-control study. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(10):789-796.

Can Playing Video Games Benefit the Brains of Older Adults?

Playing 3D video games may prevent mild cognitive impairment and, perhaps, Alzheimer’s disease, according to a study published December 6, 2017, in PLoS One. In two separate studies, adults in their 20s played 3D video games on platforms such as Super Mario 64. The gray matter in their hippocampus increased after training. Researchers examined whether the results could be replicated in healthy seniors. Thirty-three people, ages 55 to 75, were randomly assigned to one of three groups. The video game experimental group engaged in 3D-platform video game training over six months. An active control group took a series of self-directed, computerized piano lessons, and a no-contact control group did not engage in any intervention. Participants in the video-game cohort had increases in gray matter volume in the hippocampus and cerebellum. Their short-term memory also improved.

West GL, Zendel BR, Konishi K, et al. Playing Super Mario 64 increases hippocampal grey matter in older adults. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0187779.

FDA Approves Vercise Deep Brain Stimulation System

The FDA has approved the Vercise Deep Brain Stimulation System (DBS) to treat symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. The approval is based on the INTREPID study, a multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial of DBS for Parkinson’s disease in the US. The study evaluated the system’s safety and efficacy in 292 patients at 23 sites. The Vercise DBS System successfully met its primary end point of mean change in waking hours with good symptom control. The filing also was supported by safety data from the VANTAGE study, in which 40 patients treated with the system demonstrated a 63% improvement in motor function at 52 weeks from baseline, as measured by the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale III. Boston Scientific markets Vercise.

 

 

Can Social Relationships Aid Cognitive Function?

Although superagers (ie, people older than 80 with episodic memory as good as that of a middle-aged adult) and their cognitively average-for-age peers report similarly high levels of psychological well-being, superagers demonstrate greater levels of positive social relationships, according to a study published October 23, 2017, in PLoS One. Thirty-one superagers and 19 cognitively average-for-age peers completed the Ryff 42-item Psychological Well-Being questionnaire, which includes subscales of autonomy, positive relations with others, environmental mastery, personal growth, purpose in life, and self-acceptance. The groups did not differ on demographic factors, including estimated premorbid intelligence. Compared with cognitively average-for-age peers, superagers endorsed greater levels of positive relations with others. Superagers had a median overall score of 40 in positive relations with others, compared with 36 in the control group.

Cook Maher A, Kielb S, Loyer E, et al. Psychological well-being in elderly adults with extraordinary episodic memory. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186413.

—Kimberly Williams

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
4-5
Sections

Sleep Improves After Retirement

Transition to statutory retirement is associated with a decrease in sleep difficulties, especially waking up too early in the morning and nonrestorative sleep, according to a study published online ahead of print November 16, 2017, in Sleep. The study included 5,807 public sector employees who retired between 2000 and 2011. Participants were administered the Jenkins Sleep Problem Scale Questionnaire before and after retirement in surveys conducted every four years. At the last study wave before retirement, 30% of the participants had sleep difficulties. The risk ratio for having sleep difficulties in the first study wave following retirement, compared with the last study wave preceding retirement, was 0.89. The decreases in sleep difficulties occurred primarily among people with psychologic distress, suboptimal self-rated health, short sleep duration, and job strain before retirement.

Myllyntausta S, Salo P, Kronholm E, et al. Changes in sleep difficulties during the transition to statutory retirement. Sleep. 2017 Nov 16 [Epub ahead of print].

Vigorous Exercise May Delay Parkinson’s Disease Progression

High-intensity treadmill exercise may be feasible and prescribed safely for patients with Parkinson’s disease, according to a study published online ahead of print December 11, 2017, in JAMA Neurology. The randomized clinical trial included 128 participants between ages 40 and 80. Participants were at an early stage of the disease and not taking Parkinson’s disease medication. Investigators randomized the population to high-intensity exercise, moderate-intensity exercise, or a control condition. At baseline and six months, clinicians assessed the participants using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Participants in the study had a UPDRS score of about 20 at baseline. At six months, the high-intensity group’s score stayed at 20, and the moderate exercise group worsened by 1.5 points. The control group’s score worsened by three points.

Schenkman M, Moore CG, Kohrt WM, et al. Effect of high-intensity treadmill exercise on motor symptoms in patients with de novo Parkinson disease: a phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Dec 11 [Epub ahead of print].

Can Exposure to Terror Raise the Risk of Headache?

Exposure to terror increases the risk of persistent weekly and daily migraine and tension-type headache in adolescent survivors above expected levels, according to a study published online ahead of print December 13, 2017, in Neurology. Investigators interviewed 213 survivors of a terror attack in Norway. Half were male, the mean age was 17.7, and 13 survivors were severely injured. Participants provided information about their headache frequency four to five months after the attack. For each survivor, eight matched controls were drawn from the Young-HUNT3 Study. After exposure to terror, the odds ratio for migraine was 4.27, and that for tension-type headache was 3.39, as estimated in multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for injury, sex, age, family structure and economy, prior exposure to physical or sexual violence, and psychologic distress.

Stensland SØ, Zwart JA, Wentzel-Larsen T, Dyb G. The headache of terror: a matched cohort study of adolescents from the Utøya and the HUNT Study. Neurology. 2017 Dec 13 [Epub ahead of print].

Diet Reduces Disability and Symptoms of MS

A healthy diet and a composite healthy lifestyle are associated with less disability and symptom burden in multiple sclerosis (MS), according to a study published online ahead of print December 6, 2017, in Neurology. The study involved 6,989 people with MS who completed questionnaires about their diet as part of the North American Research Committee registry. The questionnaire estimated intake of fruits, vegetables and legumes, whole grains, added sugars, and red and processed meats. Researchers constructed an overall diet quality score for each individual based on the food groups. Participants with diet quality scores in the highest quintile had lower levels of disability and lower depression scores. Individuals reporting a composite healthy lifestyle had lower odds of reporting severe fatigue, depression, pain, or cognitive impairment.

Fitzgerald KC, Tyry T, Salter A, et al. Diet quality is associated with disability and symptom severity in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2017 Dec 6 [Epub ahead of print].

What Are the Effects of Childhood Convulsive Status Epilepticus?

Childhood convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is associated with substantial long-term neurologic morbidity, but primarily in people who have epilepsy, neurologic abnormalities, or both before the episode of CSE, according to a study published online ahead of print December 5, 2017, in Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. Researchers followed a population-based childhood CSE cohort. Of 203 survivors, 134 were assessed at a median follow-up of 8.9 years. Lasting neurologic conditions, including epilepsy, learning disabilities, and movement problems, were more common among participants than expected for children from the general population. Children who had existing neurologic or developmental issues at the time of CSE were more likely to have a neurologic problem at follow-up. Children without a neurologic or developmental issue tended to have better outcomes.

 

 

Pujar SS, Martinos MM, Cortina-Borja M, et al. Long-term prognosis after childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2017 Dec 5 [Epub ahead of print].

Protein Aggregation May Not Affect Cognition in Parkinson’s Disease

Patterns of cortical β-amyloid and tau do not differ between people with Parkinson’s disease who are cognitively normal (PD-CN), people with Parkinson’s disease with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI), and healthy older adults, according to a study published online ahead of print December 11, 2017, in JAMA Neurology. This cross-sectional study included 29 patients with Parkinson’s disease from a tertiary care medical center and research institutions. Imaging measures were compared with those of 49 healthy control participants. Outcomes were tau PET measurements of groups of patients with PD-CN and PD-MCI. Of the participants, 47 were female, and the mean age was 71.1. Voxelwise contrasts of whole-brain tau PET uptake between patients with PD-CN and patients with PD-MCI, and between patients with Parkinson’s disease and β-amyloid-negative controls, did not reveal significant differences.

Winer JR, Maass A, Pressman P, et al. Associations between tau, β-amyloid, and cognition in Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Dec 11 [Epub ahead of print].

Hormone Therapy Not Linked to Increased Stroke Risk

Postmenopausal hormone therapy is not associated with increased risk of stroke, provided that it is started early, according to a study published November 17 in PLoS Medicine. Researchers analyzed data on postmenopausal hormone therapy from five cohort studies including 88,914 women, combined with data from national registries on diagnoses and causes of death during a follow-up period. During a median follow-up of 14.3 years, 6,371 first-time stroke events (1,080 hemorrhagic) were recorded. Hormone therapy was not linked to increased risk of stroke if the therapy was initiated within five years of menopausal onset, regardless of means of administration, type of therapy, active substance, and treatment duration. In subanalyses, researchers observed an increase in risk for hemorrhagic stroke if the therapy contained the active substance conjugated equine estrogens.

Carrasquilla GD, Frumento P, Berglund A, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of stroke: a pooled analysis of data from population-based cohort studies. PLoS Med. 2017;14(11):e1002445.

Restless Sleep May Be Linked to Parkinson’s Disease

In patients with idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (IRBD), PET shows increased microglial activation in the substantia nigra, along with reduced dopaminergic function in the putamen, according to a study published in the October 2017 issue of Lancet Neurology. This prospective, case–control PET study included 20 patients with IRBD and no clinical evidence of parkinsonism and cognitive impairment recruited from tertiary sleep centers and 19 healthy controls. 11C-PK11195 binding was increased on the left side of the substantia nigra in patients with IRBD, compared with controls, but not on the right side. 11C-PK11195 binding was not significantly increased in the putamen and caudate of patients with IRBD. 18F-DOPA uptake was reduced in IRBD in the left putamen and right putamen, but not in the caudate.

Stokholm MG, Iranzo A, Østergaard K, et al. Assessment of neuroinflammation in patients with idiopathic rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder: a case-control study. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(10):789-796.

Can Playing Video Games Benefit the Brains of Older Adults?

Playing 3D video games may prevent mild cognitive impairment and, perhaps, Alzheimer’s disease, according to a study published December 6, 2017, in PLoS One. In two separate studies, adults in their 20s played 3D video games on platforms such as Super Mario 64. The gray matter in their hippocampus increased after training. Researchers examined whether the results could be replicated in healthy seniors. Thirty-three people, ages 55 to 75, were randomly assigned to one of three groups. The video game experimental group engaged in 3D-platform video game training over six months. An active control group took a series of self-directed, computerized piano lessons, and a no-contact control group did not engage in any intervention. Participants in the video-game cohort had increases in gray matter volume in the hippocampus and cerebellum. Their short-term memory also improved.

West GL, Zendel BR, Konishi K, et al. Playing Super Mario 64 increases hippocampal grey matter in older adults. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0187779.

FDA Approves Vercise Deep Brain Stimulation System

The FDA has approved the Vercise Deep Brain Stimulation System (DBS) to treat symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. The approval is based on the INTREPID study, a multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial of DBS for Parkinson’s disease in the US. The study evaluated the system’s safety and efficacy in 292 patients at 23 sites. The Vercise DBS System successfully met its primary end point of mean change in waking hours with good symptom control. The filing also was supported by safety data from the VANTAGE study, in which 40 patients treated with the system demonstrated a 63% improvement in motor function at 52 weeks from baseline, as measured by the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale III. Boston Scientific markets Vercise.

 

 

Can Social Relationships Aid Cognitive Function?

Although superagers (ie, people older than 80 with episodic memory as good as that of a middle-aged adult) and their cognitively average-for-age peers report similarly high levels of psychological well-being, superagers demonstrate greater levels of positive social relationships, according to a study published October 23, 2017, in PLoS One. Thirty-one superagers and 19 cognitively average-for-age peers completed the Ryff 42-item Psychological Well-Being questionnaire, which includes subscales of autonomy, positive relations with others, environmental mastery, personal growth, purpose in life, and self-acceptance. The groups did not differ on demographic factors, including estimated premorbid intelligence. Compared with cognitively average-for-age peers, superagers endorsed greater levels of positive relations with others. Superagers had a median overall score of 40 in positive relations with others, compared with 36 in the control group.

Cook Maher A, Kielb S, Loyer E, et al. Psychological well-being in elderly adults with extraordinary episodic memory. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186413.

—Kimberly Williams

Sleep Improves After Retirement

Transition to statutory retirement is associated with a decrease in sleep difficulties, especially waking up too early in the morning and nonrestorative sleep, according to a study published online ahead of print November 16, 2017, in Sleep. The study included 5,807 public sector employees who retired between 2000 and 2011. Participants were administered the Jenkins Sleep Problem Scale Questionnaire before and after retirement in surveys conducted every four years. At the last study wave before retirement, 30% of the participants had sleep difficulties. The risk ratio for having sleep difficulties in the first study wave following retirement, compared with the last study wave preceding retirement, was 0.89. The decreases in sleep difficulties occurred primarily among people with psychologic distress, suboptimal self-rated health, short sleep duration, and job strain before retirement.

Myllyntausta S, Salo P, Kronholm E, et al. Changes in sleep difficulties during the transition to statutory retirement. Sleep. 2017 Nov 16 [Epub ahead of print].

Vigorous Exercise May Delay Parkinson’s Disease Progression

High-intensity treadmill exercise may be feasible and prescribed safely for patients with Parkinson’s disease, according to a study published online ahead of print December 11, 2017, in JAMA Neurology. The randomized clinical trial included 128 participants between ages 40 and 80. Participants were at an early stage of the disease and not taking Parkinson’s disease medication. Investigators randomized the population to high-intensity exercise, moderate-intensity exercise, or a control condition. At baseline and six months, clinicians assessed the participants using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Participants in the study had a UPDRS score of about 20 at baseline. At six months, the high-intensity group’s score stayed at 20, and the moderate exercise group worsened by 1.5 points. The control group’s score worsened by three points.

Schenkman M, Moore CG, Kohrt WM, et al. Effect of high-intensity treadmill exercise on motor symptoms in patients with de novo Parkinson disease: a phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Dec 11 [Epub ahead of print].

Can Exposure to Terror Raise the Risk of Headache?

Exposure to terror increases the risk of persistent weekly and daily migraine and tension-type headache in adolescent survivors above expected levels, according to a study published online ahead of print December 13, 2017, in Neurology. Investigators interviewed 213 survivors of a terror attack in Norway. Half were male, the mean age was 17.7, and 13 survivors were severely injured. Participants provided information about their headache frequency four to five months after the attack. For each survivor, eight matched controls were drawn from the Young-HUNT3 Study. After exposure to terror, the odds ratio for migraine was 4.27, and that for tension-type headache was 3.39, as estimated in multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for injury, sex, age, family structure and economy, prior exposure to physical or sexual violence, and psychologic distress.

Stensland SØ, Zwart JA, Wentzel-Larsen T, Dyb G. The headache of terror: a matched cohort study of adolescents from the Utøya and the HUNT Study. Neurology. 2017 Dec 13 [Epub ahead of print].

Diet Reduces Disability and Symptoms of MS

A healthy diet and a composite healthy lifestyle are associated with less disability and symptom burden in multiple sclerosis (MS), according to a study published online ahead of print December 6, 2017, in Neurology. The study involved 6,989 people with MS who completed questionnaires about their diet as part of the North American Research Committee registry. The questionnaire estimated intake of fruits, vegetables and legumes, whole grains, added sugars, and red and processed meats. Researchers constructed an overall diet quality score for each individual based on the food groups. Participants with diet quality scores in the highest quintile had lower levels of disability and lower depression scores. Individuals reporting a composite healthy lifestyle had lower odds of reporting severe fatigue, depression, pain, or cognitive impairment.

Fitzgerald KC, Tyry T, Salter A, et al. Diet quality is associated with disability and symptom severity in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2017 Dec 6 [Epub ahead of print].

What Are the Effects of Childhood Convulsive Status Epilepticus?

Childhood convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is associated with substantial long-term neurologic morbidity, but primarily in people who have epilepsy, neurologic abnormalities, or both before the episode of CSE, according to a study published online ahead of print December 5, 2017, in Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. Researchers followed a population-based childhood CSE cohort. Of 203 survivors, 134 were assessed at a median follow-up of 8.9 years. Lasting neurologic conditions, including epilepsy, learning disabilities, and movement problems, were more common among participants than expected for children from the general population. Children who had existing neurologic or developmental issues at the time of CSE were more likely to have a neurologic problem at follow-up. Children without a neurologic or developmental issue tended to have better outcomes.

 

 

Pujar SS, Martinos MM, Cortina-Borja M, et al. Long-term prognosis after childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2017 Dec 5 [Epub ahead of print].

Protein Aggregation May Not Affect Cognition in Parkinson’s Disease

Patterns of cortical β-amyloid and tau do not differ between people with Parkinson’s disease who are cognitively normal (PD-CN), people with Parkinson’s disease with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI), and healthy older adults, according to a study published online ahead of print December 11, 2017, in JAMA Neurology. This cross-sectional study included 29 patients with Parkinson’s disease from a tertiary care medical center and research institutions. Imaging measures were compared with those of 49 healthy control participants. Outcomes were tau PET measurements of groups of patients with PD-CN and PD-MCI. Of the participants, 47 were female, and the mean age was 71.1. Voxelwise contrasts of whole-brain tau PET uptake between patients with PD-CN and patients with PD-MCI, and between patients with Parkinson’s disease and β-amyloid-negative controls, did not reveal significant differences.

Winer JR, Maass A, Pressman P, et al. Associations between tau, β-amyloid, and cognition in Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Dec 11 [Epub ahead of print].

Hormone Therapy Not Linked to Increased Stroke Risk

Postmenopausal hormone therapy is not associated with increased risk of stroke, provided that it is started early, according to a study published November 17 in PLoS Medicine. Researchers analyzed data on postmenopausal hormone therapy from five cohort studies including 88,914 women, combined with data from national registries on diagnoses and causes of death during a follow-up period. During a median follow-up of 14.3 years, 6,371 first-time stroke events (1,080 hemorrhagic) were recorded. Hormone therapy was not linked to increased risk of stroke if the therapy was initiated within five years of menopausal onset, regardless of means of administration, type of therapy, active substance, and treatment duration. In subanalyses, researchers observed an increase in risk for hemorrhagic stroke if the therapy contained the active substance conjugated equine estrogens.

Carrasquilla GD, Frumento P, Berglund A, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of stroke: a pooled analysis of data from population-based cohort studies. PLoS Med. 2017;14(11):e1002445.

Restless Sleep May Be Linked to Parkinson’s Disease

In patients with idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (IRBD), PET shows increased microglial activation in the substantia nigra, along with reduced dopaminergic function in the putamen, according to a study published in the October 2017 issue of Lancet Neurology. This prospective, case–control PET study included 20 patients with IRBD and no clinical evidence of parkinsonism and cognitive impairment recruited from tertiary sleep centers and 19 healthy controls. 11C-PK11195 binding was increased on the left side of the substantia nigra in patients with IRBD, compared with controls, but not on the right side. 11C-PK11195 binding was not significantly increased in the putamen and caudate of patients with IRBD. 18F-DOPA uptake was reduced in IRBD in the left putamen and right putamen, but not in the caudate.

Stokholm MG, Iranzo A, Østergaard K, et al. Assessment of neuroinflammation in patients with idiopathic rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder: a case-control study. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(10):789-796.

Can Playing Video Games Benefit the Brains of Older Adults?

Playing 3D video games may prevent mild cognitive impairment and, perhaps, Alzheimer’s disease, according to a study published December 6, 2017, in PLoS One. In two separate studies, adults in their 20s played 3D video games on platforms such as Super Mario 64. The gray matter in their hippocampus increased after training. Researchers examined whether the results could be replicated in healthy seniors. Thirty-three people, ages 55 to 75, were randomly assigned to one of three groups. The video game experimental group engaged in 3D-platform video game training over six months. An active control group took a series of self-directed, computerized piano lessons, and a no-contact control group did not engage in any intervention. Participants in the video-game cohort had increases in gray matter volume in the hippocampus and cerebellum. Their short-term memory also improved.

West GL, Zendel BR, Konishi K, et al. Playing Super Mario 64 increases hippocampal grey matter in older adults. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0187779.

FDA Approves Vercise Deep Brain Stimulation System

The FDA has approved the Vercise Deep Brain Stimulation System (DBS) to treat symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. The approval is based on the INTREPID study, a multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial of DBS for Parkinson’s disease in the US. The study evaluated the system’s safety and efficacy in 292 patients at 23 sites. The Vercise DBS System successfully met its primary end point of mean change in waking hours with good symptom control. The filing also was supported by safety data from the VANTAGE study, in which 40 patients treated with the system demonstrated a 63% improvement in motor function at 52 weeks from baseline, as measured by the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale III. Boston Scientific markets Vercise.

 

 

Can Social Relationships Aid Cognitive Function?

Although superagers (ie, people older than 80 with episodic memory as good as that of a middle-aged adult) and their cognitively average-for-age peers report similarly high levels of psychological well-being, superagers demonstrate greater levels of positive social relationships, according to a study published October 23, 2017, in PLoS One. Thirty-one superagers and 19 cognitively average-for-age peers completed the Ryff 42-item Psychological Well-Being questionnaire, which includes subscales of autonomy, positive relations with others, environmental mastery, personal growth, purpose in life, and self-acceptance. The groups did not differ on demographic factors, including estimated premorbid intelligence. Compared with cognitively average-for-age peers, superagers endorsed greater levels of positive relations with others. Superagers had a median overall score of 40 in positive relations with others, compared with 36 in the control group.

Cook Maher A, Kielb S, Loyer E, et al. Psychological well-being in elderly adults with extraordinary episodic memory. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186413.

—Kimberly Williams

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(1)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(1)
Page Number
4-5
Page Number
4-5
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

MRI Reveals Lymphatic Vessels in Dura

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 15:52
Imaging meningeal lymphatics may allow researchers to study potential abnormalities in neurologic disorders.

Researchers have visualized lymphatic vessels in the dura mater of humans on MRI, according to a short report published October 3, 2017, in eLife. They also have identified lymphatic vessels in brain tissue samples using immunostaining. The results suggest that the vessels could act as a pipeline between the brain and the immune system.

“Overall, our data clearly and consistently demonstrate the existence of lymphatic vessels within the dura mater of human and nonhuman primates,” said Daniel S. Reich, MD, PhD, Senior Investigator at the NINDS, and colleagues. “The ability to image the meningeal lymphatics noninvasively immediately suggests the possibility of studying potential abnormalities” in neurologic disorders, they said.

Daniel S. Reich, MD, PhD

A Fundamental Shift

In most of the body, lymphatic vessels transport immune cells and waste products from organs to the bloodstream, but the brain was thought not to have lymphatic vessels. In 2015, however, researchers found evidence of the brain’s lymphatic system in the dura of mice. Dr. Reich saw a presentation by an author of one the mouse studies, Jonathan Kipnis, PhD, Chair of the Department of Neuroscience at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, and “was completely surprised.”

“In medical school, we were taught that the brain has no lymphatic system,” Dr. Reich said. “After Dr. Kipnis’s talk, I thought maybe we could find it in human brains.”

Dr. Reich and colleagues scanned the brains of five healthy volunteers who had been injected with gadobutrol, a dye used during MRI scans to visualize brain blood vessels. Gadobutrol that had leaked out of blood vessels in the dura as part of a normal process collected inside lymphatic vessels in the dura and showed up as bright white lines on MRI. “We watched people’s brains drain fluid into these vessels,” said Dr. Reich. When they repeated the experiment using a different dye that leaks much less out of blood vessels (ie, gadofosveset), the lymphatic vessels did not appear on imaging.

Similar findings were observed in monkeys.

The lymphatic vessels had been difficult to identify because they resemble blood vessels, which are far more numerous, the researchers said.

“These results could fundamentally change the way we think about how the brain and immune system interrelate,” said Walter J. Koroshetz, MD, NINDS director.

Meningeal Lymphatic Network

MRI showed collection of interstitial gadolinium within dural lymphatic vessels in all five of the healthy volunteers (ages 28 to 53, three women) and all three of the common marmoset monkeys studied. The vessels had a maximum apparent diameter of approximately 1 mm. “Our results suggest that in the dura, similar to many other organs throughout the body, small intravascular molecules extravasate into the interstitium and then, under a hydrostatic pressure gradient, collect into lymphatic capillaries through a loose lymphatic endothelium,” the researchers said. “On 3D rendering of subtraction MRI images, dural lymphatics are seen running parallel to the dural venous sinuses, especially the superior sagittal and straight sinuses, and alongside branches of the middle meningeal artery. The topography of the meningeal lymphatics fits with the previously described network in rodents.”

Courtesy of the Reich Lab, NIH/NINDS
A 3D rendering of the topography of the dural lymphatic vasculature, as seen on a 3-T gadolinium-enhanced MRI scan. The image shows lymphatic vessels running primarily along the major dural venous sinuses. The choroid plexus also is visible.

Although MRI shows large, slow-flow lymphatic ducts, “blind-ending and small lymphatic capillaries, clearly seen by histopathology, are unlikely to be revealed by MRI,” the researchers noted. In addition, they “could not prove whether dural lymphatic vessels drain immune cells, CSF, or other substances from the brain to deep cervical lymph nodes” or assess any link with the glymphatic system. “A comprehensive map of the meningeal lymphatic network would have implications for unraveling the ways in which the meningeal lymphatics participate in waste clearance and in immune cell trafficking within the CNS,” the researchers said.

Neuropathologic evaluation focused on dura samples from two formalin-fixed brains (from patients ages 60 and 77 with longstanding progressive multiple sclerosis) and from a 33-year-old patient with refractory epilepsy undergoing anterior temporal lobectomy.

Future studies may examine the role that dural lymphatics play in inflammatory pathologic conditions. The researchers have observed “clusters of extravascular CD3+ lymphocytes and CD68+ phagocytic meningeal macrophages … in the dura of several multiple sclerosis autopsies, confirming intense immune cell trafficking and communication.” Furthermore, “lymphatic dysfunction might impair waste clearance in neurodegenerative diseases and aging, in line with the recently captured deposition of β-amyloid in human dura in elderly people,” the researchers said.

—Jake Remaly

Suggested Reading

Absinta M, Ha SK, Nair G, et al. Human and nonhuman primate meninges harbor lymphatic vessels that can be visualized noninvasively by MRI. Elife. 2017 Oct 3;6:e29738.

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
13
Sections
Related Articles
Imaging meningeal lymphatics may allow researchers to study potential abnormalities in neurologic disorders.
Imaging meningeal lymphatics may allow researchers to study potential abnormalities in neurologic disorders.

Researchers have visualized lymphatic vessels in the dura mater of humans on MRI, according to a short report published October 3, 2017, in eLife. They also have identified lymphatic vessels in brain tissue samples using immunostaining. The results suggest that the vessels could act as a pipeline between the brain and the immune system.

“Overall, our data clearly and consistently demonstrate the existence of lymphatic vessels within the dura mater of human and nonhuman primates,” said Daniel S. Reich, MD, PhD, Senior Investigator at the NINDS, and colleagues. “The ability to image the meningeal lymphatics noninvasively immediately suggests the possibility of studying potential abnormalities” in neurologic disorders, they said.

Daniel S. Reich, MD, PhD

A Fundamental Shift

In most of the body, lymphatic vessels transport immune cells and waste products from organs to the bloodstream, but the brain was thought not to have lymphatic vessels. In 2015, however, researchers found evidence of the brain’s lymphatic system in the dura of mice. Dr. Reich saw a presentation by an author of one the mouse studies, Jonathan Kipnis, PhD, Chair of the Department of Neuroscience at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, and “was completely surprised.”

“In medical school, we were taught that the brain has no lymphatic system,” Dr. Reich said. “After Dr. Kipnis’s talk, I thought maybe we could find it in human brains.”

Dr. Reich and colleagues scanned the brains of five healthy volunteers who had been injected with gadobutrol, a dye used during MRI scans to visualize brain blood vessels. Gadobutrol that had leaked out of blood vessels in the dura as part of a normal process collected inside lymphatic vessels in the dura and showed up as bright white lines on MRI. “We watched people’s brains drain fluid into these vessels,” said Dr. Reich. When they repeated the experiment using a different dye that leaks much less out of blood vessels (ie, gadofosveset), the lymphatic vessels did not appear on imaging.

Similar findings were observed in monkeys.

The lymphatic vessels had been difficult to identify because they resemble blood vessels, which are far more numerous, the researchers said.

“These results could fundamentally change the way we think about how the brain and immune system interrelate,” said Walter J. Koroshetz, MD, NINDS director.

Meningeal Lymphatic Network

MRI showed collection of interstitial gadolinium within dural lymphatic vessels in all five of the healthy volunteers (ages 28 to 53, three women) and all three of the common marmoset monkeys studied. The vessels had a maximum apparent diameter of approximately 1 mm. “Our results suggest that in the dura, similar to many other organs throughout the body, small intravascular molecules extravasate into the interstitium and then, under a hydrostatic pressure gradient, collect into lymphatic capillaries through a loose lymphatic endothelium,” the researchers said. “On 3D rendering of subtraction MRI images, dural lymphatics are seen running parallel to the dural venous sinuses, especially the superior sagittal and straight sinuses, and alongside branches of the middle meningeal artery. The topography of the meningeal lymphatics fits with the previously described network in rodents.”

Courtesy of the Reich Lab, NIH/NINDS
A 3D rendering of the topography of the dural lymphatic vasculature, as seen on a 3-T gadolinium-enhanced MRI scan. The image shows lymphatic vessels running primarily along the major dural venous sinuses. The choroid plexus also is visible.

Although MRI shows large, slow-flow lymphatic ducts, “blind-ending and small lymphatic capillaries, clearly seen by histopathology, are unlikely to be revealed by MRI,” the researchers noted. In addition, they “could not prove whether dural lymphatic vessels drain immune cells, CSF, or other substances from the brain to deep cervical lymph nodes” or assess any link with the glymphatic system. “A comprehensive map of the meningeal lymphatic network would have implications for unraveling the ways in which the meningeal lymphatics participate in waste clearance and in immune cell trafficking within the CNS,” the researchers said.

Neuropathologic evaluation focused on dura samples from two formalin-fixed brains (from patients ages 60 and 77 with longstanding progressive multiple sclerosis) and from a 33-year-old patient with refractory epilepsy undergoing anterior temporal lobectomy.

Future studies may examine the role that dural lymphatics play in inflammatory pathologic conditions. The researchers have observed “clusters of extravascular CD3+ lymphocytes and CD68+ phagocytic meningeal macrophages … in the dura of several multiple sclerosis autopsies, confirming intense immune cell trafficking and communication.” Furthermore, “lymphatic dysfunction might impair waste clearance in neurodegenerative diseases and aging, in line with the recently captured deposition of β-amyloid in human dura in elderly people,” the researchers said.

—Jake Remaly

Suggested Reading

Absinta M, Ha SK, Nair G, et al. Human and nonhuman primate meninges harbor lymphatic vessels that can be visualized noninvasively by MRI. Elife. 2017 Oct 3;6:e29738.

Researchers have visualized lymphatic vessels in the dura mater of humans on MRI, according to a short report published October 3, 2017, in eLife. They also have identified lymphatic vessels in brain tissue samples using immunostaining. The results suggest that the vessels could act as a pipeline between the brain and the immune system.

“Overall, our data clearly and consistently demonstrate the existence of lymphatic vessels within the dura mater of human and nonhuman primates,” said Daniel S. Reich, MD, PhD, Senior Investigator at the NINDS, and colleagues. “The ability to image the meningeal lymphatics noninvasively immediately suggests the possibility of studying potential abnormalities” in neurologic disorders, they said.

Daniel S. Reich, MD, PhD

A Fundamental Shift

In most of the body, lymphatic vessels transport immune cells and waste products from organs to the bloodstream, but the brain was thought not to have lymphatic vessels. In 2015, however, researchers found evidence of the brain’s lymphatic system in the dura of mice. Dr. Reich saw a presentation by an author of one the mouse studies, Jonathan Kipnis, PhD, Chair of the Department of Neuroscience at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, and “was completely surprised.”

“In medical school, we were taught that the brain has no lymphatic system,” Dr. Reich said. “After Dr. Kipnis’s talk, I thought maybe we could find it in human brains.”

Dr. Reich and colleagues scanned the brains of five healthy volunteers who had been injected with gadobutrol, a dye used during MRI scans to visualize brain blood vessels. Gadobutrol that had leaked out of blood vessels in the dura as part of a normal process collected inside lymphatic vessels in the dura and showed up as bright white lines on MRI. “We watched people’s brains drain fluid into these vessels,” said Dr. Reich. When they repeated the experiment using a different dye that leaks much less out of blood vessels (ie, gadofosveset), the lymphatic vessels did not appear on imaging.

Similar findings were observed in monkeys.

The lymphatic vessels had been difficult to identify because they resemble blood vessels, which are far more numerous, the researchers said.

“These results could fundamentally change the way we think about how the brain and immune system interrelate,” said Walter J. Koroshetz, MD, NINDS director.

Meningeal Lymphatic Network

MRI showed collection of interstitial gadolinium within dural lymphatic vessels in all five of the healthy volunteers (ages 28 to 53, three women) and all three of the common marmoset monkeys studied. The vessels had a maximum apparent diameter of approximately 1 mm. “Our results suggest that in the dura, similar to many other organs throughout the body, small intravascular molecules extravasate into the interstitium and then, under a hydrostatic pressure gradient, collect into lymphatic capillaries through a loose lymphatic endothelium,” the researchers said. “On 3D rendering of subtraction MRI images, dural lymphatics are seen running parallel to the dural venous sinuses, especially the superior sagittal and straight sinuses, and alongside branches of the middle meningeal artery. The topography of the meningeal lymphatics fits with the previously described network in rodents.”

Courtesy of the Reich Lab, NIH/NINDS
A 3D rendering of the topography of the dural lymphatic vasculature, as seen on a 3-T gadolinium-enhanced MRI scan. The image shows lymphatic vessels running primarily along the major dural venous sinuses. The choroid plexus also is visible.

Although MRI shows large, slow-flow lymphatic ducts, “blind-ending and small lymphatic capillaries, clearly seen by histopathology, are unlikely to be revealed by MRI,” the researchers noted. In addition, they “could not prove whether dural lymphatic vessels drain immune cells, CSF, or other substances from the brain to deep cervical lymph nodes” or assess any link with the glymphatic system. “A comprehensive map of the meningeal lymphatic network would have implications for unraveling the ways in which the meningeal lymphatics participate in waste clearance and in immune cell trafficking within the CNS,” the researchers said.

Neuropathologic evaluation focused on dura samples from two formalin-fixed brains (from patients ages 60 and 77 with longstanding progressive multiple sclerosis) and from a 33-year-old patient with refractory epilepsy undergoing anterior temporal lobectomy.

Future studies may examine the role that dural lymphatics play in inflammatory pathologic conditions. The researchers have observed “clusters of extravascular CD3+ lymphocytes and CD68+ phagocytic meningeal macrophages … in the dura of several multiple sclerosis autopsies, confirming intense immune cell trafficking and communication.” Furthermore, “lymphatic dysfunction might impair waste clearance in neurodegenerative diseases and aging, in line with the recently captured deposition of β-amyloid in human dura in elderly people,” the researchers said.

—Jake Remaly

Suggested Reading

Absinta M, Ha SK, Nair G, et al. Human and nonhuman primate meninges harbor lymphatic vessels that can be visualized noninvasively by MRI. Elife. 2017 Oct 3;6:e29738.

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(1)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(1)
Page Number
13
Page Number
13
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Massachusetts named healthiest state for 2017

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 14:43

 

A year of surprises ended with one more bit of unexpected news: Massachusetts, not Hawaii, is the healthiest state in the country, according to the annual “America’s Heath Rankings” report.

Massachusetts’ win may have knocked Hawaii out of the top spot for the first time since 2011, but the Aloha State was still second out of 50 in 2017. Two other New England states were in the top five: Vermont in third and Connecticut in fifth, with Utah sandwiched between them in fourth, the United Health Foundation said in its latest report.

For 2017, the anti-Massachusetts was Mississippi, which finished 50th for the second consecutive year and has never finished out of the bottom three in the 28 years of the rankings’ existence. The other states with the “most significant areas of opportunity for improvement in health and well-being” were Louisiana (ranked 49th), Arkansas (48th), Alabama (47th), and West Virginia (46th), the report said.

The report ranks states using 35 measures in five broad areas: behaviors, community and environment, policy, clinical care, and outcomes. The measures include drug-related death rate, percentage of children in poverty, public health funding per person, mental health provider rate, and diabetes rate.

“America’s Health Rankings” is funded entirely by the private, not-for-profit United Health Foundation, founded by UnitedHealth Group, which operates UnitedHealthcare.
 

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

A year of surprises ended with one more bit of unexpected news: Massachusetts, not Hawaii, is the healthiest state in the country, according to the annual “America’s Heath Rankings” report.

Massachusetts’ win may have knocked Hawaii out of the top spot for the first time since 2011, but the Aloha State was still second out of 50 in 2017. Two other New England states were in the top five: Vermont in third and Connecticut in fifth, with Utah sandwiched between them in fourth, the United Health Foundation said in its latest report.

For 2017, the anti-Massachusetts was Mississippi, which finished 50th for the second consecutive year and has never finished out of the bottom three in the 28 years of the rankings’ existence. The other states with the “most significant areas of opportunity for improvement in health and well-being” were Louisiana (ranked 49th), Arkansas (48th), Alabama (47th), and West Virginia (46th), the report said.

The report ranks states using 35 measures in five broad areas: behaviors, community and environment, policy, clinical care, and outcomes. The measures include drug-related death rate, percentage of children in poverty, public health funding per person, mental health provider rate, and diabetes rate.

“America’s Health Rankings” is funded entirely by the private, not-for-profit United Health Foundation, founded by UnitedHealth Group, which operates UnitedHealthcare.
 

 

A year of surprises ended with one more bit of unexpected news: Massachusetts, not Hawaii, is the healthiest state in the country, according to the annual “America’s Heath Rankings” report.

Massachusetts’ win may have knocked Hawaii out of the top spot for the first time since 2011, but the Aloha State was still second out of 50 in 2017. Two other New England states were in the top five: Vermont in third and Connecticut in fifth, with Utah sandwiched between them in fourth, the United Health Foundation said in its latest report.

For 2017, the anti-Massachusetts was Mississippi, which finished 50th for the second consecutive year and has never finished out of the bottom three in the 28 years of the rankings’ existence. The other states with the “most significant areas of opportunity for improvement in health and well-being” were Louisiana (ranked 49th), Arkansas (48th), Alabama (47th), and West Virginia (46th), the report said.

The report ranks states using 35 measures in five broad areas: behaviors, community and environment, policy, clinical care, and outcomes. The measures include drug-related death rate, percentage of children in poverty, public health funding per person, mental health provider rate, and diabetes rate.

“America’s Health Rankings” is funded entirely by the private, not-for-profit United Health Foundation, founded by UnitedHealth Group, which operates UnitedHealthcare.
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Is mannitol a good alternative agent for evaluating ureteral patency after gynecologic surgery?

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/04/2021 - 15:32
Display Headline
Is mannitol a good alternative agent for evaluating ureteral patency after gynecologic surgery?

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Although the incidence of lower urinary tract and ureteral injury following gynecologic surgery is low, intraoperative identification of ureteral patency can prevent serious long-term sequelae. Since the indigo carmine shortage in 2014, US surgeons have searched for multiple alternative agents. Intravenous methylene blue is suboptimal due to its systemic adverse effects and the length of time for dye excretion in the urine.

Grimes and colleagues conducted a study to determine if there was any significant difference in surgeon satisfaction among 4 different alternatives to indigo carmine for intraoperative ureteral patency evaluation.

 

Related article:
Farewell to indigo carmine

 

Details of the study

The investigators conducted a randomized clinical trial of 130 women undergoing benign gynecologic or pelvic reconstructive surgery. Four different regimens were used for intraoperative ureteral evaluation: 1) oral phenazopyridine 200 mg, 2) intravenous sodium fluorescein 25 mg, 3) mannitol bladder distention, and 4) normal saline bladder distention.

Study outcomes. The primary outcome was surgeon satisfaction based on a 0 to 100 point visual analog scale rating (with 0 indicating strong agreement, 100 indicating disagreement). Secondary outcomes included ease of ureteral jet visualization, time to surgeon confidence of ureteral patency, and occurrence of adverse events over 6 weeks.

Surgeon satisfaction rating. The investigators found statistically significant physician satisfaction with the use of mannitol as a bladder distention medium over oral phenazopyridine, and slightly better satisfaction compared with the use of intravenous sodium fluorescein or normal saline distention. The median (range) visual analog scores for ureteral patency were phenazopyridine, 48 (0–83); sodium fluorescein 20 (0–82); mannitol, 0 (0–44); and normal saline, 23 (3–96) (P<.001).

There was no difference across the 4 groups in the timing to surgeon confidence of ureteral patency, length of cystoscopy (on average, 3 minutes), and development of postoperative urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Most dissatisfaction related to phenazopyridine is the fact that the resulting orange-stained urine can obscure the bladder mucosa.

One significant adverse event was a protocol deviation in which 1 patient received an incorrect dose of IV sodium fluorescein (500 mg) instead of the recommended 25-mg dose.

 

Related article:
Alternative options for visualizing ureteral patency during intraoperative cystoscopy

 

Study strengths and weaknesses

The strength of this study is in its randomized design and power. Its major weakness is surgeon bias, since the surgeons could not possibly be blinded to the method used.

The study confirms the problem that phenazopyridine makes the urine so orange that bladder mucosal lesions and de novo hematuria could be difficult to detect. Recommending mannitol as a hypertonic distending medium (as it is used in hysteroscopy procedures), however, may be premature. Prior studies have shown increased postoperative UTIs when 50% and 10% dextrose was used versus normal saline for cystoscopy.1,2 Since the Grimes study protocol did not include postoperative urine collection for cultures, more research on UTIs after mannitol use would be needed before surgeons confidently could use it routinely.

In our practice, surgeons prefer that intravenous sodium fluorescein be administered just prior to cystoscopy and oral phenazopyridine en route to the operating room. I agree that a major disadvantage to phenazopyridine is the heavy orange staining that obscures visualization.

Finally, this study did not account for cost of the various methods; standard normal saline would be cheapest, followed by phenazopyridine.

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
This study showed that surgeon satisfaction was greatest with the use of mannitol as a distending medium for intraoperative evaluation of ureteral patency compared with oral phenazopyridine, intravenous sodium fluorescein, and normal saline distention. However, time to surgeon confidence of ureteral patency was similar with all 4 methods. More data are needed related to UTIs and the cost of mannitol compared with the other 3 methods.
-- Cheryl B. Iglesia, MD

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

References
  1. Narasimhulu DM, Prabakar C, Tang N, Bral P. 50% dextrose versus normal saline as distention media during cystoscopy for assessment of ureteric patency. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;199:38–41.
  2. Siff LN, Unger CA, Jelovsek JE, Paraiso MF, Ridgeway BM, Barber MD. Assessing ureteral patency using 10% dextrose cystoscopy fluid: evaluation of urinary tract infection rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):74.e1–e6.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Cheryl B. Iglesia, MD, is Director, Section of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, and Professor, Departments of ObGyn and Urology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. Dr. Iglesia is a member of the OBG MANAGEMENT Board of Editors.

The author reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Issue
OBG Management - 30(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
38, 37
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Cheryl B. Iglesia, MD, is Director, Section of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, and Professor, Departments of ObGyn and Urology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. Dr. Iglesia is a member of the OBG MANAGEMENT Board of Editors.

The author reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Author and Disclosure Information

Cheryl B. Iglesia, MD, is Director, Section of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, and Professor, Departments of ObGyn and Urology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. Dr. Iglesia is a member of the OBG MANAGEMENT Board of Editors.

The author reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Although the incidence of lower urinary tract and ureteral injury following gynecologic surgery is low, intraoperative identification of ureteral patency can prevent serious long-term sequelae. Since the indigo carmine shortage in 2014, US surgeons have searched for multiple alternative agents. Intravenous methylene blue is suboptimal due to its systemic adverse effects and the length of time for dye excretion in the urine.

Grimes and colleagues conducted a study to determine if there was any significant difference in surgeon satisfaction among 4 different alternatives to indigo carmine for intraoperative ureteral patency evaluation.

 

Related article:
Farewell to indigo carmine

 

Details of the study

The investigators conducted a randomized clinical trial of 130 women undergoing benign gynecologic or pelvic reconstructive surgery. Four different regimens were used for intraoperative ureteral evaluation: 1) oral phenazopyridine 200 mg, 2) intravenous sodium fluorescein 25 mg, 3) mannitol bladder distention, and 4) normal saline bladder distention.

Study outcomes. The primary outcome was surgeon satisfaction based on a 0 to 100 point visual analog scale rating (with 0 indicating strong agreement, 100 indicating disagreement). Secondary outcomes included ease of ureteral jet visualization, time to surgeon confidence of ureteral patency, and occurrence of adverse events over 6 weeks.

Surgeon satisfaction rating. The investigators found statistically significant physician satisfaction with the use of mannitol as a bladder distention medium over oral phenazopyridine, and slightly better satisfaction compared with the use of intravenous sodium fluorescein or normal saline distention. The median (range) visual analog scores for ureteral patency were phenazopyridine, 48 (0–83); sodium fluorescein 20 (0–82); mannitol, 0 (0–44); and normal saline, 23 (3–96) (P<.001).

There was no difference across the 4 groups in the timing to surgeon confidence of ureteral patency, length of cystoscopy (on average, 3 minutes), and development of postoperative urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Most dissatisfaction related to phenazopyridine is the fact that the resulting orange-stained urine can obscure the bladder mucosa.

One significant adverse event was a protocol deviation in which 1 patient received an incorrect dose of IV sodium fluorescein (500 mg) instead of the recommended 25-mg dose.

 

Related article:
Alternative options for visualizing ureteral patency during intraoperative cystoscopy

 

Study strengths and weaknesses

The strength of this study is in its randomized design and power. Its major weakness is surgeon bias, since the surgeons could not possibly be blinded to the method used.

The study confirms the problem that phenazopyridine makes the urine so orange that bladder mucosal lesions and de novo hematuria could be difficult to detect. Recommending mannitol as a hypertonic distending medium (as it is used in hysteroscopy procedures), however, may be premature. Prior studies have shown increased postoperative UTIs when 50% and 10% dextrose was used versus normal saline for cystoscopy.1,2 Since the Grimes study protocol did not include postoperative urine collection for cultures, more research on UTIs after mannitol use would be needed before surgeons confidently could use it routinely.

In our practice, surgeons prefer that intravenous sodium fluorescein be administered just prior to cystoscopy and oral phenazopyridine en route to the operating room. I agree that a major disadvantage to phenazopyridine is the heavy orange staining that obscures visualization.

Finally, this study did not account for cost of the various methods; standard normal saline would be cheapest, followed by phenazopyridine.

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
This study showed that surgeon satisfaction was greatest with the use of mannitol as a distending medium for intraoperative evaluation of ureteral patency compared with oral phenazopyridine, intravenous sodium fluorescein, and normal saline distention. However, time to surgeon confidence of ureteral patency was similar with all 4 methods. More data are needed related to UTIs and the cost of mannitol compared with the other 3 methods.
-- Cheryl B. Iglesia, MD

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Although the incidence of lower urinary tract and ureteral injury following gynecologic surgery is low, intraoperative identification of ureteral patency can prevent serious long-term sequelae. Since the indigo carmine shortage in 2014, US surgeons have searched for multiple alternative agents. Intravenous methylene blue is suboptimal due to its systemic adverse effects and the length of time for dye excretion in the urine.

Grimes and colleagues conducted a study to determine if there was any significant difference in surgeon satisfaction among 4 different alternatives to indigo carmine for intraoperative ureteral patency evaluation.

 

Related article:
Farewell to indigo carmine

 

Details of the study

The investigators conducted a randomized clinical trial of 130 women undergoing benign gynecologic or pelvic reconstructive surgery. Four different regimens were used for intraoperative ureteral evaluation: 1) oral phenazopyridine 200 mg, 2) intravenous sodium fluorescein 25 mg, 3) mannitol bladder distention, and 4) normal saline bladder distention.

Study outcomes. The primary outcome was surgeon satisfaction based on a 0 to 100 point visual analog scale rating (with 0 indicating strong agreement, 100 indicating disagreement). Secondary outcomes included ease of ureteral jet visualization, time to surgeon confidence of ureteral patency, and occurrence of adverse events over 6 weeks.

Surgeon satisfaction rating. The investigators found statistically significant physician satisfaction with the use of mannitol as a bladder distention medium over oral phenazopyridine, and slightly better satisfaction compared with the use of intravenous sodium fluorescein or normal saline distention. The median (range) visual analog scores for ureteral patency were phenazopyridine, 48 (0–83); sodium fluorescein 20 (0–82); mannitol, 0 (0–44); and normal saline, 23 (3–96) (P<.001).

There was no difference across the 4 groups in the timing to surgeon confidence of ureteral patency, length of cystoscopy (on average, 3 minutes), and development of postoperative urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Most dissatisfaction related to phenazopyridine is the fact that the resulting orange-stained urine can obscure the bladder mucosa.

One significant adverse event was a protocol deviation in which 1 patient received an incorrect dose of IV sodium fluorescein (500 mg) instead of the recommended 25-mg dose.

 

Related article:
Alternative options for visualizing ureteral patency during intraoperative cystoscopy

 

Study strengths and weaknesses

The strength of this study is in its randomized design and power. Its major weakness is surgeon bias, since the surgeons could not possibly be blinded to the method used.

The study confirms the problem that phenazopyridine makes the urine so orange that bladder mucosal lesions and de novo hematuria could be difficult to detect. Recommending mannitol as a hypertonic distending medium (as it is used in hysteroscopy procedures), however, may be premature. Prior studies have shown increased postoperative UTIs when 50% and 10% dextrose was used versus normal saline for cystoscopy.1,2 Since the Grimes study protocol did not include postoperative urine collection for cultures, more research on UTIs after mannitol use would be needed before surgeons confidently could use it routinely.

In our practice, surgeons prefer that intravenous sodium fluorescein be administered just prior to cystoscopy and oral phenazopyridine en route to the operating room. I agree that a major disadvantage to phenazopyridine is the heavy orange staining that obscures visualization.

Finally, this study did not account for cost of the various methods; standard normal saline would be cheapest, followed by phenazopyridine.

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
This study showed that surgeon satisfaction was greatest with the use of mannitol as a distending medium for intraoperative evaluation of ureteral patency compared with oral phenazopyridine, intravenous sodium fluorescein, and normal saline distention. However, time to surgeon confidence of ureteral patency was similar with all 4 methods. More data are needed related to UTIs and the cost of mannitol compared with the other 3 methods.
-- Cheryl B. Iglesia, MD

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

References
  1. Narasimhulu DM, Prabakar C, Tang N, Bral P. 50% dextrose versus normal saline as distention media during cystoscopy for assessment of ureteric patency. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;199:38–41.
  2. Siff LN, Unger CA, Jelovsek JE, Paraiso MF, Ridgeway BM, Barber MD. Assessing ureteral patency using 10% dextrose cystoscopy fluid: evaluation of urinary tract infection rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):74.e1–e6.
References
  1. Narasimhulu DM, Prabakar C, Tang N, Bral P. 50% dextrose versus normal saline as distention media during cystoscopy for assessment of ureteric patency. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;199:38–41.
  2. Siff LN, Unger CA, Jelovsek JE, Paraiso MF, Ridgeway BM, Barber MD. Assessing ureteral patency using 10% dextrose cystoscopy fluid: evaluation of urinary tract infection rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):74.e1–e6.
Issue
OBG Management - 30(1)
Issue
OBG Management - 30(1)
Page Number
38, 37
Page Number
38, 37
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Is mannitol a good alternative agent for evaluating ureteral patency after gynecologic surgery?
Display Headline
Is mannitol a good alternative agent for evaluating ureteral patency after gynecologic surgery?
Sections
Citation Override
OBG Manag. 2018 January;30(1):38, 37. Published online December 4, 2017.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Article PDF Media

Commentary—Study Heightens Awareness, But at What Cost?

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/07/2019 - 10:37

The study conducted by Brookmeyer and colleagues is a logical and thoughtful attempt to size the potential impact of Alzheimer's disease now and in the future, updating old-technology estimates based on actual diagnoses with new technologically derived diagnoses of preclinical neurodegenerative states. They acknowledge that the uncertainty in the actual disease burden we will face is centered on the question of conversion rates, which vary between studies and are far less certain in the preclinical stages than the symptomatic ones.
 
Scientific interest aside, the main purpose of an article like this is to heighten awareness and concern by demonstrating that symptomatic Alzheimer's disease is the tip of a much larger iceberg and warrants more funding for research and clinical care. The worry that articles like this—or that the media attention they receive—create for me, however, is that they potentially contribute to a growing public panic at a time when we still lack truly meaningful therapy. As a doctor, I want to give my patients with MCI and dementia reason to believe they still have a meaningful life and that there is hope, rather than having them feel that I have just pronounced a death sentence.

The attention paid by the Alzheimer's Association is understandable, given its mission of increasing awareness and supporting more funding, but it omits to mention another important article showing that dementia rates are actually declining when data are adjusted for our aging population (observed vs expected).
 
We need to maintain public awareness without creating panic. There is no question that Alzheimer's disease is a major public health issue that warrants all the funding we can provide to researchers seeking a cure. How to balance that need with the need to give our population hope that all is not lost when they misplace their keys is the challenge this article raises.

Richard J. Caselli, MD
Professor of Neurology
Mayo Clinic
Scottsdale, Arizona

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
25
Sections
Related Articles

The study conducted by Brookmeyer and colleagues is a logical and thoughtful attempt to size the potential impact of Alzheimer's disease now and in the future, updating old-technology estimates based on actual diagnoses with new technologically derived diagnoses of preclinical neurodegenerative states. They acknowledge that the uncertainty in the actual disease burden we will face is centered on the question of conversion rates, which vary between studies and are far less certain in the preclinical stages than the symptomatic ones.
 
Scientific interest aside, the main purpose of an article like this is to heighten awareness and concern by demonstrating that symptomatic Alzheimer's disease is the tip of a much larger iceberg and warrants more funding for research and clinical care. The worry that articles like this—or that the media attention they receive—create for me, however, is that they potentially contribute to a growing public panic at a time when we still lack truly meaningful therapy. As a doctor, I want to give my patients with MCI and dementia reason to believe they still have a meaningful life and that there is hope, rather than having them feel that I have just pronounced a death sentence.

The attention paid by the Alzheimer's Association is understandable, given its mission of increasing awareness and supporting more funding, but it omits to mention another important article showing that dementia rates are actually declining when data are adjusted for our aging population (observed vs expected).
 
We need to maintain public awareness without creating panic. There is no question that Alzheimer's disease is a major public health issue that warrants all the funding we can provide to researchers seeking a cure. How to balance that need with the need to give our population hope that all is not lost when they misplace their keys is the challenge this article raises.

Richard J. Caselli, MD
Professor of Neurology
Mayo Clinic
Scottsdale, Arizona

The study conducted by Brookmeyer and colleagues is a logical and thoughtful attempt to size the potential impact of Alzheimer's disease now and in the future, updating old-technology estimates based on actual diagnoses with new technologically derived diagnoses of preclinical neurodegenerative states. They acknowledge that the uncertainty in the actual disease burden we will face is centered on the question of conversion rates, which vary between studies and are far less certain in the preclinical stages than the symptomatic ones.
 
Scientific interest aside, the main purpose of an article like this is to heighten awareness and concern by demonstrating that symptomatic Alzheimer's disease is the tip of a much larger iceberg and warrants more funding for research and clinical care. The worry that articles like this—or that the media attention they receive—create for me, however, is that they potentially contribute to a growing public panic at a time when we still lack truly meaningful therapy. As a doctor, I want to give my patients with MCI and dementia reason to believe they still have a meaningful life and that there is hope, rather than having them feel that I have just pronounced a death sentence.

The attention paid by the Alzheimer's Association is understandable, given its mission of increasing awareness and supporting more funding, but it omits to mention another important article showing that dementia rates are actually declining when data are adjusted for our aging population (observed vs expected).
 
We need to maintain public awareness without creating panic. There is no question that Alzheimer's disease is a major public health issue that warrants all the funding we can provide to researchers seeking a cure. How to balance that need with the need to give our population hope that all is not lost when they misplace their keys is the challenge this article raises.

Richard J. Caselli, MD
Professor of Neurology
Mayo Clinic
Scottsdale, Arizona

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(1)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(1)
Page Number
25
Page Number
25
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Sodium Oxybate Reduces Daytime Sleepiness in Parkinson’s Disease

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 15:52
Researchers say that their sample size is insufficient to support conclusions about the treatment’s safety.

Sodium oxybate effectively treats excessive daytime sleepiness and nocturnal sleep disturbance in patients with Parkinson’s disease, according to research published in the January issue of JAMA Neurology. Patients receiving this therapy should be monitored with follow-up polysomnography to rule out treatment-related complications, the investigators said.

Many patients with Parkinson’s disease have excessive daytime sleepiness and disturbed sleep, but few treatments are available for them. An open-label study found that sodium oxybate, a first-line therapy for narcolepsy type 1, improved sleep and reduced daytime sleepiness in Parkinson’s disease.

A Phase II Crossover Study

To investigate this treatment further, Christian Baumann, MD, Senior Physician at University Hospital Zürich, and colleagues enrolled 18 patients into a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover phase IIa study. Eligible participants had Parkinson’s disease and regularly took dopaminergic medication. People with sleep apnea, cognitive problems, or depression, and those who took hypnotics, were excluded from the study.

Christian Baumann, MD

The researchers randomized participants in equal groups to sodium oxybate or placebo. Study medications were taken daily at bedtime and 2.5 to four hours later for six weeks. Doses were titrated between 3 g/night and 9 g/night according to efficacy and tolerability. After a two- to four-week washout period, participants crossed over to the opposite treatment arm for six weeks.

The trial’s primary efficacy end point was treatment effect on mean sleep latency (MSL), as measured by the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT). Secondary end points included change in subjective excessive daytime sleepiness (as measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]), sleep quality, and objective sleep parameters. The investigators measured outcomes in the sleep laboratory at baseline and after six weeks of therapy.

Adverse Events Were Mild or Moderate

Five patients were excluded because of sleep apnea, and one patient withdrew consent. Of the 12 patients randomized, two were women. At baseline, participants’ mean age was 62, and mean disease duration was 8.4 years. Two patients developed de novo sleep apnea during sodium oxybate treatment, and one of them dropped out.

In the intention-to-treat analysis, sodium oxybate increased MSL by 2.9 minutes and reduced ESS score by 4.2 points. In the per-protocol analysis, sodium oxybate increased MSL by 3.5 minutes and reduced ESS score by 5.2 points. The responder rate for sodium oxybate (ie, the percentage of patients who had an improvement in MSL of more than 50%) was 67%. ESS score normalized for half of patients.

Every patient who received sodium oxybate had adverse events of mild or moderate intensity. The majority of these adverse events resolved after dose adjustment. Four patients continued to have adverse events until the end of the study, but none dropped out because of them.

Sodium oxybate had a treatment effect “that, to our knowledge, is unmatched by any other intervention reported so far,” said Dr. Baumann and colleagues. Although the sample size was large enough to provide class I evidence of efficacy, it was insufficient to support conclusions about safety, said the researchers. Larger follow-up trials thus are necessary, they concluded.

—Erik Greb

Suggested Reading

Büchele F, Hackius M, Schreglmann SR, et al. Sodium oxybate for excessive daytime sleepiness and sleep disturbance in Parkinson disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(1):114-118.

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
12
Sections
Related Articles
Researchers say that their sample size is insufficient to support conclusions about the treatment’s safety.
Researchers say that their sample size is insufficient to support conclusions about the treatment’s safety.

Sodium oxybate effectively treats excessive daytime sleepiness and nocturnal sleep disturbance in patients with Parkinson’s disease, according to research published in the January issue of JAMA Neurology. Patients receiving this therapy should be monitored with follow-up polysomnography to rule out treatment-related complications, the investigators said.

Many patients with Parkinson’s disease have excessive daytime sleepiness and disturbed sleep, but few treatments are available for them. An open-label study found that sodium oxybate, a first-line therapy for narcolepsy type 1, improved sleep and reduced daytime sleepiness in Parkinson’s disease.

A Phase II Crossover Study

To investigate this treatment further, Christian Baumann, MD, Senior Physician at University Hospital Zürich, and colleagues enrolled 18 patients into a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover phase IIa study. Eligible participants had Parkinson’s disease and regularly took dopaminergic medication. People with sleep apnea, cognitive problems, or depression, and those who took hypnotics, were excluded from the study.

Christian Baumann, MD

The researchers randomized participants in equal groups to sodium oxybate or placebo. Study medications were taken daily at bedtime and 2.5 to four hours later for six weeks. Doses were titrated between 3 g/night and 9 g/night according to efficacy and tolerability. After a two- to four-week washout period, participants crossed over to the opposite treatment arm for six weeks.

The trial’s primary efficacy end point was treatment effect on mean sleep latency (MSL), as measured by the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT). Secondary end points included change in subjective excessive daytime sleepiness (as measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]), sleep quality, and objective sleep parameters. The investigators measured outcomes in the sleep laboratory at baseline and after six weeks of therapy.

Adverse Events Were Mild or Moderate

Five patients were excluded because of sleep apnea, and one patient withdrew consent. Of the 12 patients randomized, two were women. At baseline, participants’ mean age was 62, and mean disease duration was 8.4 years. Two patients developed de novo sleep apnea during sodium oxybate treatment, and one of them dropped out.

In the intention-to-treat analysis, sodium oxybate increased MSL by 2.9 minutes and reduced ESS score by 4.2 points. In the per-protocol analysis, sodium oxybate increased MSL by 3.5 minutes and reduced ESS score by 5.2 points. The responder rate for sodium oxybate (ie, the percentage of patients who had an improvement in MSL of more than 50%) was 67%. ESS score normalized for half of patients.

Every patient who received sodium oxybate had adverse events of mild or moderate intensity. The majority of these adverse events resolved after dose adjustment. Four patients continued to have adverse events until the end of the study, but none dropped out because of them.

Sodium oxybate had a treatment effect “that, to our knowledge, is unmatched by any other intervention reported so far,” said Dr. Baumann and colleagues. Although the sample size was large enough to provide class I evidence of efficacy, it was insufficient to support conclusions about safety, said the researchers. Larger follow-up trials thus are necessary, they concluded.

—Erik Greb

Suggested Reading

Büchele F, Hackius M, Schreglmann SR, et al. Sodium oxybate for excessive daytime sleepiness and sleep disturbance in Parkinson disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(1):114-118.

Sodium oxybate effectively treats excessive daytime sleepiness and nocturnal sleep disturbance in patients with Parkinson’s disease, according to research published in the January issue of JAMA Neurology. Patients receiving this therapy should be monitored with follow-up polysomnography to rule out treatment-related complications, the investigators said.

Many patients with Parkinson’s disease have excessive daytime sleepiness and disturbed sleep, but few treatments are available for them. An open-label study found that sodium oxybate, a first-line therapy for narcolepsy type 1, improved sleep and reduced daytime sleepiness in Parkinson’s disease.

A Phase II Crossover Study

To investigate this treatment further, Christian Baumann, MD, Senior Physician at University Hospital Zürich, and colleagues enrolled 18 patients into a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover phase IIa study. Eligible participants had Parkinson’s disease and regularly took dopaminergic medication. People with sleep apnea, cognitive problems, or depression, and those who took hypnotics, were excluded from the study.

Christian Baumann, MD

The researchers randomized participants in equal groups to sodium oxybate or placebo. Study medications were taken daily at bedtime and 2.5 to four hours later for six weeks. Doses were titrated between 3 g/night and 9 g/night according to efficacy and tolerability. After a two- to four-week washout period, participants crossed over to the opposite treatment arm for six weeks.

The trial’s primary efficacy end point was treatment effect on mean sleep latency (MSL), as measured by the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT). Secondary end points included change in subjective excessive daytime sleepiness (as measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]), sleep quality, and objective sleep parameters. The investigators measured outcomes in the sleep laboratory at baseline and after six weeks of therapy.

Adverse Events Were Mild or Moderate

Five patients were excluded because of sleep apnea, and one patient withdrew consent. Of the 12 patients randomized, two were women. At baseline, participants’ mean age was 62, and mean disease duration was 8.4 years. Two patients developed de novo sleep apnea during sodium oxybate treatment, and one of them dropped out.

In the intention-to-treat analysis, sodium oxybate increased MSL by 2.9 minutes and reduced ESS score by 4.2 points. In the per-protocol analysis, sodium oxybate increased MSL by 3.5 minutes and reduced ESS score by 5.2 points. The responder rate for sodium oxybate (ie, the percentage of patients who had an improvement in MSL of more than 50%) was 67%. ESS score normalized for half of patients.

Every patient who received sodium oxybate had adverse events of mild or moderate intensity. The majority of these adverse events resolved after dose adjustment. Four patients continued to have adverse events until the end of the study, but none dropped out because of them.

Sodium oxybate had a treatment effect “that, to our knowledge, is unmatched by any other intervention reported so far,” said Dr. Baumann and colleagues. Although the sample size was large enough to provide class I evidence of efficacy, it was insufficient to support conclusions about safety, said the researchers. Larger follow-up trials thus are necessary, they concluded.

—Erik Greb

Suggested Reading

Büchele F, Hackius M, Schreglmann SR, et al. Sodium oxybate for excessive daytime sleepiness and sleep disturbance in Parkinson disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(1):114-118.

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(1)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(1)
Page Number
12
Page Number
12
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Dementia: Past, Present, and Future

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/07/2019 - 10:37

Jeffrey Cummings, MD, ScD
Director, Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas

Disclosure: Jeffrey Cummings has provided consultation to Axovant, biOasis Technologies, Biogen, Boehinger-Ingelheim, Bracket, Dart, Eisai, Genentech, Grifols, Intracellular Therapies, Kyowa, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Medavante, Merck, Neurotrope, Novartis, Nutricia, Orion, Otsuka, Pfizer, Probiodrug, QR, Resverlogix, Servier, Suven, Takeda, Toyoma, and United Neuroscience companies.

Jeffrey Cummings, MD, ScD

As Neurology Reviews celebrates its 25th anniversary, we take this opportunity to look back and to look ahead in the area of dementia care and research. Most dementia research has focused on Alzheimer’s disease, although there have been important evolutions in the diagnosis, pathology, and potential interventions for frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders, dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson’s disease dementia, and vascular dementia.

Alzheimer’s Disease

Twenty-five years ago—coinciding with the inauguration of Neurology Reviews—the first treatment for Alzheimer’s disease, the cholinesterase inhibitor tacrine, was approved by the FDA. Tacrine had many limitations, including a short half-life and a propensity to cause hepatotoxicity, but it represented an historical breakthrough in transforming an untreatable disease into a treatable one. The approval energized the field and gave hope to thousands of patients with Alzheimer’s disease dementia.

Tacrine was followed by other cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in the next decade, with five drugs approved by the end of 2003. Unfortunately, no new agents have been approved for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease since that fertile period.1 Tremendous efforts are now being devoted to developing disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. There are promising preliminary observations for immunotherapies that remove amyloid-beta protein from the brain and stabilize cognitive decline.2 Progress in the development of disease-modifying treatments will transform the field, requiring much of the health care system and insurance companies, but offering an improved quality of life for millions of patients with Alzheimer’s disease.

Previous Advances

A major advance in understanding Alzheimer’s disease is the discovery that the disease begins with amyloid accumulation in mid-life, approximately 15 years before the onset of cognitive decline.3 The advent of amyloid imaging has allowed the visualization of fibrillar amyloid-comprising Alzheimer-type neuritic plaques in the brain of the living person. Scans become positive 15 years prior to the emergence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and progression to Alzheimer’s disease dementia. If one is destined to develop MCI at age 75, the scan would be positive by approximately age 60. CSF levels of amyloid beta decline simultaneously as the protein is trapped in the brain, thus resulting in positive amyloid imaging. More recently, findings from tau protein imaging have begun to remodel our understanding of the role of tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Tau imaging correlates with the emergence of symptoms in the MCI phase of Alzheimer’s disease.4 Tau correlates with cognitive decline; positive amyloid imaging does not.

Future Challenges

Looking to the future, it is likely that companion biomarkers such as amyloid and tau imaging will be approved for clinical use. They will enable neurologists to identify the patients whose brain changes match the mechanism of action of the intended treatment (eg, positive tau imaging for those to receive anti-tau therapy and positive amyloid imaging for individuals intended to receive anti-amyloid therapy).

Anticipated directions of therapy development include treatment of individuals before the onset of symptoms, phase-specific therapies that respond to the evolving state changes of Alzheimer’s disease, and combination therapies based on the observation that most patients with Alzheimer’s disease harbor multiple types of brain pathology.5 Alzheimer’s disease therapeutics will proceed in the direction of precision medicine with better matching of therapies to the features of the disorder for the individual patient.

The US health care system is unprepared for the advent of disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer’s disease. Recognition of patients with mild changes, availability of amyloid imaging to support diagnosis and identify therapeutic targets, and the number of infusion centers to administer monoclonal antibodies are all insufficient to respond to the large and growing number of patients with or at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Transformation of the system’s capacity will be needed as disease-modifying treatments emerge.

Advances in the understanding of frontotemporal dementia have not yet led to a breakthrough therapy. Frontotemporal dementia has been shown to be pathologically heterogeneous, with about half of the patients having an underlying tauopathy, and about half having TDP-43 as the associated aggregated protein.6 A few cases have rarer forms of pathology. Major phenotypes of frontotemporal dementia include behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, progressive nonfluent aphasia, and semantic dementia. Trials of new candidate therapies are progressing for frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders, and new treatments are anticipated.

Progress in understanding dementia with Lewy bodies has led to the publication of diagnostic criteria.7 The phenotype of parkinsonism, fluctuating cognition, and visual hallucinations is supported by decreased dopamine uptake on dopamine transporter (DaT) scanning and the presence of REM sleep behavior disorder. Lewy bodies are found in the limbic and neocortex at autopsy; many cases have concomitant amyloid plaques similar to those of Alzheimer’s disease. Parkinson’s disease dementia has many of the same features and is distinguished from dementia with Lewy bodies only by the order of appearance of major symptoms—dementia first in dementia with Lewy bodies, parkinsonism first in Parkinson’s disease dementia. Rivastigmine is approved for the symptomatic treatment of cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease dementia, and trials of new therapies are being conducted in Parkinson’s disease dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies. Alpha-synuclein is present in both disorders and is the target of new disease-modifying treatments currently in clinical trials.

Improved understanding of the basic biology of neurodegenerative disease is critically important and must be accelerated. This knowledge will provide the foundation for improved diagnostics and therapeutics essential for responding to the needs of the burgeoning number of patients with these late-life brain disorders.

 

 

References

1. Cummings JL, Morstorf T, Zhong K. Alzheimer’s disease drug-development pipeline: few candidates, frequent failures. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014;6(4):37-43.

2. Sevigny J, Chiao P, Bussiere T, et al. The antibody aducanumab reduces Aβ plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2016;537(7618):50-56.

3. Villemagne VL, Burnham S, Bourgeat P, et al. Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(4):357-367.

4. Johnson KA, Schultz A, Betensky RA, et al. Tau positron emission tomographic imaging in aging and early Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2016;79(1):110-119.

5. James BD, Wilson RS, Boyle PA, et al. TDP-43 stage, mixed pathologies, and clinical Alzheimer’s-type dementia. Brain. 2016;139(11):2983-2993.

6. Lashley T, Rohrer JD, Mead S, Revesz T. Review: an update on clinical, genetic and pathological aspects of frontotemporal lobar degenerations. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2015;41(7):858-881.

7. McKeith IG, Boeve BF, Dickson DW, et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology. 2017;89(1):88-100.

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
19-20
Sections

Jeffrey Cummings, MD, ScD
Director, Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas

Disclosure: Jeffrey Cummings has provided consultation to Axovant, biOasis Technologies, Biogen, Boehinger-Ingelheim, Bracket, Dart, Eisai, Genentech, Grifols, Intracellular Therapies, Kyowa, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Medavante, Merck, Neurotrope, Novartis, Nutricia, Orion, Otsuka, Pfizer, Probiodrug, QR, Resverlogix, Servier, Suven, Takeda, Toyoma, and United Neuroscience companies.

Jeffrey Cummings, MD, ScD

As Neurology Reviews celebrates its 25th anniversary, we take this opportunity to look back and to look ahead in the area of dementia care and research. Most dementia research has focused on Alzheimer’s disease, although there have been important evolutions in the diagnosis, pathology, and potential interventions for frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders, dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson’s disease dementia, and vascular dementia.

Alzheimer’s Disease

Twenty-five years ago—coinciding with the inauguration of Neurology Reviews—the first treatment for Alzheimer’s disease, the cholinesterase inhibitor tacrine, was approved by the FDA. Tacrine had many limitations, including a short half-life and a propensity to cause hepatotoxicity, but it represented an historical breakthrough in transforming an untreatable disease into a treatable one. The approval energized the field and gave hope to thousands of patients with Alzheimer’s disease dementia.

Tacrine was followed by other cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in the next decade, with five drugs approved by the end of 2003. Unfortunately, no new agents have been approved for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease since that fertile period.1 Tremendous efforts are now being devoted to developing disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. There are promising preliminary observations for immunotherapies that remove amyloid-beta protein from the brain and stabilize cognitive decline.2 Progress in the development of disease-modifying treatments will transform the field, requiring much of the health care system and insurance companies, but offering an improved quality of life for millions of patients with Alzheimer’s disease.

Previous Advances

A major advance in understanding Alzheimer’s disease is the discovery that the disease begins with amyloid accumulation in mid-life, approximately 15 years before the onset of cognitive decline.3 The advent of amyloid imaging has allowed the visualization of fibrillar amyloid-comprising Alzheimer-type neuritic plaques in the brain of the living person. Scans become positive 15 years prior to the emergence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and progression to Alzheimer’s disease dementia. If one is destined to develop MCI at age 75, the scan would be positive by approximately age 60. CSF levels of amyloid beta decline simultaneously as the protein is trapped in the brain, thus resulting in positive amyloid imaging. More recently, findings from tau protein imaging have begun to remodel our understanding of the role of tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Tau imaging correlates with the emergence of symptoms in the MCI phase of Alzheimer’s disease.4 Tau correlates with cognitive decline; positive amyloid imaging does not.

Future Challenges

Looking to the future, it is likely that companion biomarkers such as amyloid and tau imaging will be approved for clinical use. They will enable neurologists to identify the patients whose brain changes match the mechanism of action of the intended treatment (eg, positive tau imaging for those to receive anti-tau therapy and positive amyloid imaging for individuals intended to receive anti-amyloid therapy).

Anticipated directions of therapy development include treatment of individuals before the onset of symptoms, phase-specific therapies that respond to the evolving state changes of Alzheimer’s disease, and combination therapies based on the observation that most patients with Alzheimer’s disease harbor multiple types of brain pathology.5 Alzheimer’s disease therapeutics will proceed in the direction of precision medicine with better matching of therapies to the features of the disorder for the individual patient.

The US health care system is unprepared for the advent of disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer’s disease. Recognition of patients with mild changes, availability of amyloid imaging to support diagnosis and identify therapeutic targets, and the number of infusion centers to administer monoclonal antibodies are all insufficient to respond to the large and growing number of patients with or at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Transformation of the system’s capacity will be needed as disease-modifying treatments emerge.

Advances in the understanding of frontotemporal dementia have not yet led to a breakthrough therapy. Frontotemporal dementia has been shown to be pathologically heterogeneous, with about half of the patients having an underlying tauopathy, and about half having TDP-43 as the associated aggregated protein.6 A few cases have rarer forms of pathology. Major phenotypes of frontotemporal dementia include behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, progressive nonfluent aphasia, and semantic dementia. Trials of new candidate therapies are progressing for frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders, and new treatments are anticipated.

Progress in understanding dementia with Lewy bodies has led to the publication of diagnostic criteria.7 The phenotype of parkinsonism, fluctuating cognition, and visual hallucinations is supported by decreased dopamine uptake on dopamine transporter (DaT) scanning and the presence of REM sleep behavior disorder. Lewy bodies are found in the limbic and neocortex at autopsy; many cases have concomitant amyloid plaques similar to those of Alzheimer’s disease. Parkinson’s disease dementia has many of the same features and is distinguished from dementia with Lewy bodies only by the order of appearance of major symptoms—dementia first in dementia with Lewy bodies, parkinsonism first in Parkinson’s disease dementia. Rivastigmine is approved for the symptomatic treatment of cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease dementia, and trials of new therapies are being conducted in Parkinson’s disease dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies. Alpha-synuclein is present in both disorders and is the target of new disease-modifying treatments currently in clinical trials.

Improved understanding of the basic biology of neurodegenerative disease is critically important and must be accelerated. This knowledge will provide the foundation for improved diagnostics and therapeutics essential for responding to the needs of the burgeoning number of patients with these late-life brain disorders.

 

 

References

1. Cummings JL, Morstorf T, Zhong K. Alzheimer’s disease drug-development pipeline: few candidates, frequent failures. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014;6(4):37-43.

2. Sevigny J, Chiao P, Bussiere T, et al. The antibody aducanumab reduces Aβ plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2016;537(7618):50-56.

3. Villemagne VL, Burnham S, Bourgeat P, et al. Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(4):357-367.

4. Johnson KA, Schultz A, Betensky RA, et al. Tau positron emission tomographic imaging in aging and early Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2016;79(1):110-119.

5. James BD, Wilson RS, Boyle PA, et al. TDP-43 stage, mixed pathologies, and clinical Alzheimer’s-type dementia. Brain. 2016;139(11):2983-2993.

6. Lashley T, Rohrer JD, Mead S, Revesz T. Review: an update on clinical, genetic and pathological aspects of frontotemporal lobar degenerations. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2015;41(7):858-881.

7. McKeith IG, Boeve BF, Dickson DW, et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology. 2017;89(1):88-100.

Jeffrey Cummings, MD, ScD
Director, Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas

Disclosure: Jeffrey Cummings has provided consultation to Axovant, biOasis Technologies, Biogen, Boehinger-Ingelheim, Bracket, Dart, Eisai, Genentech, Grifols, Intracellular Therapies, Kyowa, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Medavante, Merck, Neurotrope, Novartis, Nutricia, Orion, Otsuka, Pfizer, Probiodrug, QR, Resverlogix, Servier, Suven, Takeda, Toyoma, and United Neuroscience companies.

Jeffrey Cummings, MD, ScD

As Neurology Reviews celebrates its 25th anniversary, we take this opportunity to look back and to look ahead in the area of dementia care and research. Most dementia research has focused on Alzheimer’s disease, although there have been important evolutions in the diagnosis, pathology, and potential interventions for frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders, dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson’s disease dementia, and vascular dementia.

Alzheimer’s Disease

Twenty-five years ago—coinciding with the inauguration of Neurology Reviews—the first treatment for Alzheimer’s disease, the cholinesterase inhibitor tacrine, was approved by the FDA. Tacrine had many limitations, including a short half-life and a propensity to cause hepatotoxicity, but it represented an historical breakthrough in transforming an untreatable disease into a treatable one. The approval energized the field and gave hope to thousands of patients with Alzheimer’s disease dementia.

Tacrine was followed by other cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in the next decade, with five drugs approved by the end of 2003. Unfortunately, no new agents have been approved for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease since that fertile period.1 Tremendous efforts are now being devoted to developing disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. There are promising preliminary observations for immunotherapies that remove amyloid-beta protein from the brain and stabilize cognitive decline.2 Progress in the development of disease-modifying treatments will transform the field, requiring much of the health care system and insurance companies, but offering an improved quality of life for millions of patients with Alzheimer’s disease.

Previous Advances

A major advance in understanding Alzheimer’s disease is the discovery that the disease begins with amyloid accumulation in mid-life, approximately 15 years before the onset of cognitive decline.3 The advent of amyloid imaging has allowed the visualization of fibrillar amyloid-comprising Alzheimer-type neuritic plaques in the brain of the living person. Scans become positive 15 years prior to the emergence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and progression to Alzheimer’s disease dementia. If one is destined to develop MCI at age 75, the scan would be positive by approximately age 60. CSF levels of amyloid beta decline simultaneously as the protein is trapped in the brain, thus resulting in positive amyloid imaging. More recently, findings from tau protein imaging have begun to remodel our understanding of the role of tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Tau imaging correlates with the emergence of symptoms in the MCI phase of Alzheimer’s disease.4 Tau correlates with cognitive decline; positive amyloid imaging does not.

Future Challenges

Looking to the future, it is likely that companion biomarkers such as amyloid and tau imaging will be approved for clinical use. They will enable neurologists to identify the patients whose brain changes match the mechanism of action of the intended treatment (eg, positive tau imaging for those to receive anti-tau therapy and positive amyloid imaging for individuals intended to receive anti-amyloid therapy).

Anticipated directions of therapy development include treatment of individuals before the onset of symptoms, phase-specific therapies that respond to the evolving state changes of Alzheimer’s disease, and combination therapies based on the observation that most patients with Alzheimer’s disease harbor multiple types of brain pathology.5 Alzheimer’s disease therapeutics will proceed in the direction of precision medicine with better matching of therapies to the features of the disorder for the individual patient.

The US health care system is unprepared for the advent of disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer’s disease. Recognition of patients with mild changes, availability of amyloid imaging to support diagnosis and identify therapeutic targets, and the number of infusion centers to administer monoclonal antibodies are all insufficient to respond to the large and growing number of patients with or at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Transformation of the system’s capacity will be needed as disease-modifying treatments emerge.

Advances in the understanding of frontotemporal dementia have not yet led to a breakthrough therapy. Frontotemporal dementia has been shown to be pathologically heterogeneous, with about half of the patients having an underlying tauopathy, and about half having TDP-43 as the associated aggregated protein.6 A few cases have rarer forms of pathology. Major phenotypes of frontotemporal dementia include behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, progressive nonfluent aphasia, and semantic dementia. Trials of new candidate therapies are progressing for frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders, and new treatments are anticipated.

Progress in understanding dementia with Lewy bodies has led to the publication of diagnostic criteria.7 The phenotype of parkinsonism, fluctuating cognition, and visual hallucinations is supported by decreased dopamine uptake on dopamine transporter (DaT) scanning and the presence of REM sleep behavior disorder. Lewy bodies are found in the limbic and neocortex at autopsy; many cases have concomitant amyloid plaques similar to those of Alzheimer’s disease. Parkinson’s disease dementia has many of the same features and is distinguished from dementia with Lewy bodies only by the order of appearance of major symptoms—dementia first in dementia with Lewy bodies, parkinsonism first in Parkinson’s disease dementia. Rivastigmine is approved for the symptomatic treatment of cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease dementia, and trials of new therapies are being conducted in Parkinson’s disease dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies. Alpha-synuclein is present in both disorders and is the target of new disease-modifying treatments currently in clinical trials.

Improved understanding of the basic biology of neurodegenerative disease is critically important and must be accelerated. This knowledge will provide the foundation for improved diagnostics and therapeutics essential for responding to the needs of the burgeoning number of patients with these late-life brain disorders.

 

 

References

1. Cummings JL, Morstorf T, Zhong K. Alzheimer’s disease drug-development pipeline: few candidates, frequent failures. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014;6(4):37-43.

2. Sevigny J, Chiao P, Bussiere T, et al. The antibody aducanumab reduces Aβ plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2016;537(7618):50-56.

3. Villemagne VL, Burnham S, Bourgeat P, et al. Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(4):357-367.

4. Johnson KA, Schultz A, Betensky RA, et al. Tau positron emission tomographic imaging in aging and early Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2016;79(1):110-119.

5. James BD, Wilson RS, Boyle PA, et al. TDP-43 stage, mixed pathologies, and clinical Alzheimer’s-type dementia. Brain. 2016;139(11):2983-2993.

6. Lashley T, Rohrer JD, Mead S, Revesz T. Review: an update on clinical, genetic and pathological aspects of frontotemporal lobar degenerations. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2015;41(7):858-881.

7. McKeith IG, Boeve BF, Dickson DW, et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology. 2017;89(1):88-100.

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(1)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(1)
Page Number
19-20
Page Number
19-20
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Forehead growth

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 08:52
Display Headline
Forehead growth

Based on the doughnut shape of the growth, and other similar-looking lesions on the patient’s face, the FP diagnosed sebaceous hyperplasia (SH).

SH is a common, benign condition of the sebaceous glands. It becomes more common on the face starting in middle age. The cells that form the sebaceous gland (sebocytes) accumulate lipid material as they migrate from the basal layer of the gland to the central duct, where they release the lipid content as sebum. In younger individuals, turnover of sebocytes occurs approximately every month. With aging, the sebocyte turnover slows down. This results in crowding of primitive sebocytes within the sebaceous gland, causing the benign hamartomatous enlargement known as SH. Fortunately, there is no known potential for malignant transformation.

SH is located on the face, particularly the cheeks, forehead and nose. (There are other variations of sebaceous hyperplasia found on the lips, areolas, and genitalia.) Single—or groups—of lesions appear as yellowish, soft, small papules ranging in size from 2 to 9 mm. Aging and genetics are the most common risk factors. A small amount of sebum can sometimes be expressed with gentle pressure.

Dermoscopy aids in distinguishing between SH and nodular basal cell carcinoma (BCC). SH has a pattern of crown vessels that extend toward the center of the lesion and do not cross the midline, whereas BCC has branching vessels that can be found randomly distributed throughout the lesion. A biopsy isn’t usually necessary, unless there are features suspicious for BCC. Options for removal include electrodesiccation, cryotherapy, laser treatment, photodynamic therapy, and shave excision. Electrodessication can be performed without anesthesia using a very low setting of an electrosurgical instrument.

The patient in this case wanted the SH removed, so a shave biopsy was performed to make sure this was not a BCC. Pathology confirmed SH and the cosmetic result was excellent.

 

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Smith M. Sebaceous hyperplasia. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 931-934.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 67(1)
Publications
Topics
Sections

Based on the doughnut shape of the growth, and other similar-looking lesions on the patient’s face, the FP diagnosed sebaceous hyperplasia (SH).

SH is a common, benign condition of the sebaceous glands. It becomes more common on the face starting in middle age. The cells that form the sebaceous gland (sebocytes) accumulate lipid material as they migrate from the basal layer of the gland to the central duct, where they release the lipid content as sebum. In younger individuals, turnover of sebocytes occurs approximately every month. With aging, the sebocyte turnover slows down. This results in crowding of primitive sebocytes within the sebaceous gland, causing the benign hamartomatous enlargement known as SH. Fortunately, there is no known potential for malignant transformation.

SH is located on the face, particularly the cheeks, forehead and nose. (There are other variations of sebaceous hyperplasia found on the lips, areolas, and genitalia.) Single—or groups—of lesions appear as yellowish, soft, small papules ranging in size from 2 to 9 mm. Aging and genetics are the most common risk factors. A small amount of sebum can sometimes be expressed with gentle pressure.

Dermoscopy aids in distinguishing between SH and nodular basal cell carcinoma (BCC). SH has a pattern of crown vessels that extend toward the center of the lesion and do not cross the midline, whereas BCC has branching vessels that can be found randomly distributed throughout the lesion. A biopsy isn’t usually necessary, unless there are features suspicious for BCC. Options for removal include electrodesiccation, cryotherapy, laser treatment, photodynamic therapy, and shave excision. Electrodessication can be performed without anesthesia using a very low setting of an electrosurgical instrument.

The patient in this case wanted the SH removed, so a shave biopsy was performed to make sure this was not a BCC. Pathology confirmed SH and the cosmetic result was excellent.

 

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Smith M. Sebaceous hyperplasia. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 931-934.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com

Based on the doughnut shape of the growth, and other similar-looking lesions on the patient’s face, the FP diagnosed sebaceous hyperplasia (SH).

SH is a common, benign condition of the sebaceous glands. It becomes more common on the face starting in middle age. The cells that form the sebaceous gland (sebocytes) accumulate lipid material as they migrate from the basal layer of the gland to the central duct, where they release the lipid content as sebum. In younger individuals, turnover of sebocytes occurs approximately every month. With aging, the sebocyte turnover slows down. This results in crowding of primitive sebocytes within the sebaceous gland, causing the benign hamartomatous enlargement known as SH. Fortunately, there is no known potential for malignant transformation.

SH is located on the face, particularly the cheeks, forehead and nose. (There are other variations of sebaceous hyperplasia found on the lips, areolas, and genitalia.) Single—or groups—of lesions appear as yellowish, soft, small papules ranging in size from 2 to 9 mm. Aging and genetics are the most common risk factors. A small amount of sebum can sometimes be expressed with gentle pressure.

Dermoscopy aids in distinguishing between SH and nodular basal cell carcinoma (BCC). SH has a pattern of crown vessels that extend toward the center of the lesion and do not cross the midline, whereas BCC has branching vessels that can be found randomly distributed throughout the lesion. A biopsy isn’t usually necessary, unless there are features suspicious for BCC. Options for removal include electrodesiccation, cryotherapy, laser treatment, photodynamic therapy, and shave excision. Electrodessication can be performed without anesthesia using a very low setting of an electrosurgical instrument.

The patient in this case wanted the SH removed, so a shave biopsy was performed to make sure this was not a BCC. Pathology confirmed SH and the cosmetic result was excellent.

 

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Smith M. Sebaceous hyperplasia. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 931-934.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 67(1)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 67(1)
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Forehead growth
Display Headline
Forehead growth
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default