Historically, a variety of tools have been used to alter one’s appearance for cultural or religious purposes or to conform to standards of beauty. As a defining feature of the face, the lips provide a unique opportunity for facial aesthetic enhancement. There has been a paradigm shift in medicine favoring preventative health and a desire to slow and even reverse the aging process.¹ Acknowledging that product technology, skill sets, and cultural ideals continually evolve, this article highlights perioral anatomy, explains aging of the lower face, and reviews techniques to achieve perioral rejuvenation through volume restoration and muscle control.

Perioral Anatomy

The layers of the lips include the epidermis, subcutaneous tissue, orbicularis oris muscle fibers, and mucosa. The upper lip extends from the base of the nose to the mucosa inferiorly and to the nasolabial folds laterally. The curvilinear lower lip extends from the mucosa to the mandible inferiorly and to the oral commissures laterally.² Circumferential at the vermilion-cutaneous junction, a raised area of pale skin known as the white roll accentuates the vermilion border and provides an important landmark during lip augmentation.³ At the upper lip, this elevation of the vermilion joins at a V-shaped depression centrally to form the Cupid’s bow. The cutaneous upper lip has 2 raised vertical pillars known as the philtral columns, which are formed from decussating fibers of the orbicularis oris muscle.² The resultant midline depression is the philtrum. These defining features of the upper lip are to be preserved during augmentation procedures (Figure 1).⁴

The superior and inferior labial arteries, both branches of the facial artery, supply the upper and lower lip, respectively. The anastomotic arch of the superior labial artery is susceptible to injury from deep injection of the upper lip between the muscle layer and mucosa; therefore, caution must be exercised in this area.⁵ Injections into the vermilion and lower lip can be safely performed with less concern for vascular compromise. The vermilion derives its red color from the translucency of capillaries in the superficial papillae.² The capillary plexus at the papillae and rich sensory nerve network render the lip a highly vascular and sensitive structure.

Aging of the Lower Face

Subcutaneous fat atrophy, loss of elasticity, gravitational forces, and remodeling of the skeletal foundation all contribute to aging of the lower face. Starting as early as the third decade of life, intrinsic factors including hormonal changes and genetically determined processes produce alterations in skin quality and structure. Similarly, extrinsic aging through environmental influences, namely exposure to UV radiation and smoking, accelerate the loss of skin integrity.⁶

The decreased laxity of the skin in combination with repeated contraction of the orbicularis oris muscle results in perioral rhytides.⁷ For women in particular, vertically oriented perioral rhytides develop above the vermilion; terminal hair follicles, thicker skin, and a greater density of subcutaneous fat are presumptive protective factors for males.⁸ With time, the cutaneous portion of the upper lip lengthens and there is redistribution of volume with effacement of the upper lip vermilion.⁹ Additionally, the demarcation of the vermilion becomes blurred secondary to pallor, flattening of the philtral columns, and loss of projection of the Cupid’s bow.¹⁰

Downturning of the oral commissures is observed secondary to a combination of gravity, bone resorption, and soft tissue volume loss. Hyperactivity of the depressor anguli oris muscle exacerbates the mesolabial folds, producing marionette lines and a saddened expression.⁷ With ongoing volume loss and ligament laxity, tissue redistributes near the jaws and chin, giving rise to jowls. Similarly, perioral volume loss and descent of the malar fat-pad deepen the nasolabial folds in the aging midface.⁶

The main objective of perioral rejuvenation is to reinstate a harmonious refreshed look to the lower face; however, aesthetic analysis should occur within the context of the face as a whole, as the lips should complement the surrounding perioral cosmetic unit and overall skeletal foundation of the face. To accomplish this goal, the dermatologist’s armamentarium contains a broad variety of approaches including restriction of muscle movement, volume restoration, and surface contouring.

Volume Restoration

Treatment Options

In 2015, hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers constituted 80% of all injectable soft-tissue fillers, an 8% increase from 2014.¹¹ Hyaluronic acid has achieved immense popularity as a temporary dermal filler given its biocompatibility, longevity, and reversibility via hyaluronidase.¹²

Hyaluronic acid is a naturally occurring glycosaminoglycan that comprises the connective tissue matrix. The molecular composition affords HA its hydrophilic property, which augments dermal volume.⁷ Endogenous HA has a short half-life, and chemical modification by a cross-linking process extends longevity by 6 to 12 months. The various HA fillers are distinguished by method of purification, size of molecules, concentration and degree of cross-linking, and viscosity.^7,13,14 These differences dictate overall clinical performance such as flow properties, longevity, and stability. As a general rule, a high-viscosity product is more appropriate for deeper augmentation; fillers with low viscosity are more appropriate for correction of shallow defects.¹ Table 1 lists the HA fillers that are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for lip augmentation and/or perioral rhytides in adults 21 years and older.^15-17

Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy, longevity, and tolerability of different HA products are lacking in the literature and, where present, have strong industry influence.^18,19 The advent of assessment scales has provided an objective evaluation of perioral and lip augmentation, facilitating comparisons between products in both clinical research and practice.²⁰

Semipermanent biostimulatory dermal fillers such as calcium hydroxylapatite and poly-L-lactic acid are not recommended for lip augmentation due to an increased incidence of submucosal nodule formation.^6,14,21 Likewise, permanent fillers are not recommended given their irreversibility and risk of nodule formation around the lips.^14,22 Nonetheless, liquid silicone (purified polydimethylsiloxane) administered via a microdroplet technique (0.01 mL of silicone at a time, no more than 1 cc per lip per session) has been used off label as a permanent filling agent for lip augmentation with limited complications.²³ Regardless, trepidations about its use with respect to reported risks continue to limit its application.²²

Similarly, surgical lip implants such as expanded polytetrafluoroethylene is an option for a subset of patients desiring permanent enhancement but are less commonly utilized given the side-effect profile, irreversibility, and relatively invasive nature of the procedure.²² Lastly, autologous fat transfer has been used in correction of the nasolabial and mesolabial folds as well as in lip augmentation; however, irregular surface contours and unpredictable longevity secondary to postinjection resorption (20%–90%) has limited its popularity.^3,14,21

HA Injection Technique

With respect to HA fillers in the perioral area, numerous approaches have been described.^10,22 The techniques in Table 2 provide a foundation for lip rejuvenation.

Several injection techniques exist, including serial puncture, linear threading, cross-hatching, and fanning in a retrograde or anterograde manner.²⁴ A blunt microcannula (27 gauge, 38 mm) may be used in place of sharp needles and offers the benefit of increased patient comfort, reduced edema and ecchymosis, and shortened recovery period.^25,26 Gentle massage of the product after injection can assist with an even contour. Lastly, a key determinant of successful outcomes is using an adequate volume of HA filler (1–2 mL for shaping the vermilion border and volumizing the lips).²⁷ Figure 2 highlights a clinical example of HA filler for lip augmentation.

Fortunately, most complications encountered with HA lip augmentation are mild and transient. The most commonly observed side effects include injection-site reactions such as pain, erythema, and edema. Similarly, most adverse effects are related to injection technique. All HA fillers are prone to the Tyndall effect, a consequence of too superficial an injection plane. Patients with history of recurrent herpes simplex virus infections should receive prophylactic antiviral therapy.¹²

Muscle Control

An emerging concept in rejuvenation of the lower face recognizes not only restoration of volume but also control of muscle movement. Local injection of botulinum toxin type A induces relaxation of hyperfunctional facial muscles through temporary inhibition of neurotransmitter release.⁶ The potential for paralysis of the oral cavity may limit the application of botulinum toxin type A in that region.⁷ Nonetheless, the off-label potential of botulinum toxin type A has expanded to include several targets in the lower face. The orbicularis oris muscle is targeted to soften perioral rhytides. Conservative dosing (1–2 U per lip quadrant or approximately 5 U total) and superficial injection is emphasized in this area.²⁷ Similarly, the depressor anguli oris muscle is targeted by injection of 4 U bilaterally to soften the marionette lines. In the chin area, the mentalis muscle can be targeted by injection of 2 U deep into each belly of the muscle to reduce the mental crease and dimpling.²⁸ Combination treatment with dermal filler and neurotoxin demonstrates effects that last longer than either modality alone without additional adverse events.²⁹ With combination therapy, guidelines suggest treating with filler first.²⁷

Conclusion

A greater understanding of the extrinsic and intrinsic factors that contribute to the structural and surface changes of the aging face coupled with a preference for minimally invasive procedures has revolutionized the dermatologist’s approach to perioral rejuvenation. Serving as a focal point of the face, the lips and perioral skin are well poised to benefit from this paradigm shift. A multifaceted approach utilizing dermal fillers and neurotoxins may be most appropriate and has demonstrated optimal outcomes in facial aesthetics.

Historically, a variety of tools have been used to alter one’s appearance for cultural or religious purposes or to conform to standards of beauty. As a defining feature of the face, the lips provide a unique opportunity for facial aesthetic enhancement. There has been a paradigm shift in medicine favoring preventative health and a desire to slow and even reverse the aging process.¹ Acknowledging that product technology, skill sets, and cultural ideals continually evolve, this article highlights perioral anatomy, explains aging of the lower face, and reviews techniques to achieve perioral rejuvenation through volume restoration and muscle control.

Perioral Anatomy

The layers of the lips include the epidermis, subcutaneous tissue, orbicularis oris muscle fibers, and mucosa. The upper lip extends from the base of the nose to the mucosa inferiorly and to the nasolabial folds laterally. The curvilinear lower lip extends from the mucosa to the mandible inferiorly and to the oral commissures laterally.² Circumferential at the vermilion-cutaneous junction, a raised area of pale skin known as the white roll accentuates the vermilion border and provides an important landmark during lip augmentation.³ At the upper lip, this elevation of the vermilion joins at a V-shaped depression centrally to form the Cupid’s bow. The cutaneous upper lip has 2 raised vertical pillars known as the philtral columns, which are formed from decussating fibers of the orbicularis oris muscle.² The resultant midline depression is the philtrum. These defining features of the upper lip are to be preserved during augmentation procedures (Figure 1).⁴

The superior and inferior labial arteries, both branches of the facial artery, supply the upper and lower lip, respectively. The anastomotic arch of the superior labial artery is susceptible to injury from deep injection of the upper lip between the muscle layer and mucosa; therefore, caution must be exercised in this area.⁵ Injections into the vermilion and lower lip can be safely performed with less concern for vascular compromise. The vermilion derives its red color from the translucency of capillaries in the superficial papillae.² The capillary plexus at the papillae and rich sensory nerve network render the lip a highly vascular and sensitive structure.

Aging of the Lower Face

Subcutaneous fat atrophy, loss of elasticity, gravitational forces, and remodeling of the skeletal foundation all contribute to aging of the lower face. Starting as early as the third decade of life, intrinsic factors including hormonal changes and genetically determined processes produce alterations in skin quality and structure. Similarly, extrinsic aging through environmental influences, namely exposure to UV radiation and smoking, accelerate the loss of skin integrity.⁶

The decreased laxity of the skin in combination with repeated contraction of the orbicularis oris muscle results in perioral rhytides.⁷ For women in particular, vertically oriented perioral rhytides develop above the vermilion; terminal hair follicles, thicker skin, and a greater density of subcutaneous fat are presumptive protective factors for males.⁸ With time, the cutaneous portion of the upper lip lengthens and there is redistribution of volume with effacement of the upper lip vermilion.⁹ Additionally, the demarcation of the vermilion becomes blurred secondary to pallor, flattening of the philtral columns, and loss of projection of the Cupid’s bow.¹⁰

Downturning of the oral commissures is observed secondary to a combination of gravity, bone resorption, and soft tissue volume loss. Hyperactivity of the depressor anguli oris muscle exacerbates the mesolabial folds, producing marionette lines and a saddened expression.⁷ With ongoing volume loss and ligament laxity, tissue redistributes near the jaws and chin, giving rise to jowls. Similarly, perioral volume loss and descent of the malar fat-pad deepen the nasolabial folds in the aging midface.⁶

The main objective of perioral rejuvenation is to reinstate a harmonious refreshed look to the lower face; however, aesthetic analysis should occur within the context of the face as a whole, as the lips should complement the surrounding perioral cosmetic unit and overall skeletal foundation of the face. To accomplish this goal, the dermatologist’s armamentarium contains a broad variety of approaches including restriction of muscle movement, volume restoration, and surface contouring.

Volume Restoration

Treatment Options

In 2015, hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers constituted 80% of all injectable soft-tissue fillers, an 8% increase from 2014.¹¹ Hyaluronic acid has achieved immense popularity as a temporary dermal filler given its biocompatibility, longevity, and reversibility via hyaluronidase.¹²

Hyaluronic acid is a naturally occurring glycosaminoglycan that comprises the connective tissue matrix. The molecular composition affords HA its hydrophilic property, which augments dermal volume.⁷ Endogenous HA has a short half-life, and chemical modification by a cross-linking process extends longevity by 6 to 12 months. The various HA fillers are distinguished by method of purification, size of molecules, concentration and degree of cross-linking, and viscosity.^7,13,14 These differences dictate overall clinical performance such as flow properties, longevity, and stability. As a general rule, a high-viscosity product is more appropriate for deeper augmentation; fillers with low viscosity are more appropriate for correction of shallow defects.¹ Table 1 lists the HA fillers that are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for lip augmentation and/or perioral rhytides in adults 21 years and older.^15-17

Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy, longevity, and tolerability of different HA products are lacking in the literature and, where present, have strong industry influence.^18,19 The advent of assessment scales has provided an objective evaluation of perioral and lip augmentation, facilitating comparisons between products in both clinical research and practice.²⁰

Semipermanent biostimulatory dermal fillers such as calcium hydroxylapatite and poly-L-lactic acid are not recommended for lip augmentation due to an increased incidence of submucosal nodule formation.^6,14,21 Likewise, permanent fillers are not recommended given their irreversibility and risk of nodule formation around the lips.^14,22 Nonetheless, liquid silicone (purified polydimethylsiloxane) administered via a microdroplet technique (0.01 mL of silicone at a time, no more than 1 cc per lip per session) has been used off label as a permanent filling agent for lip augmentation with limited complications.²³ Regardless, trepidations about its use with respect to reported risks continue to limit its application.²²

Similarly, surgical lip implants such as expanded polytetrafluoroethylene is an option for a subset of patients desiring permanent enhancement but are less commonly utilized given the side-effect profile, irreversibility, and relatively invasive nature of the procedure.²² Lastly, autologous fat transfer has been used in correction of the nasolabial and mesolabial folds as well as in lip augmentation; however, irregular surface contours and unpredictable longevity secondary to postinjection resorption (20%–90%) has limited its popularity.^3,14,21

HA Injection Technique

With respect to HA fillers in the perioral area, numerous approaches have been described.^10,22 The techniques in Table 2 provide a foundation for lip rejuvenation.

Several injection techniques exist, including serial puncture, linear threading, cross-hatching, and fanning in a retrograde or anterograde manner.²⁴ A blunt microcannula (27 gauge, 38 mm) may be used in place of sharp needles and offers the benefit of increased patient comfort, reduced edema and ecchymosis, and shortened recovery period.^25,26 Gentle massage of the product after injection can assist with an even contour. Lastly, a key determinant of successful outcomes is using an adequate volume of HA filler (1–2 mL for shaping the vermilion border and volumizing the lips).²⁷ Figure 2 highlights a clinical example of HA filler for lip augmentation.

Fortunately, most complications encountered with HA lip augmentation are mild and transient. The most commonly observed side effects include injection-site reactions such as pain, erythema, and edema. Similarly, most adverse effects are related to injection technique. All HA fillers are prone to the Tyndall effect, a consequence of too superficial an injection plane. Patients with history of recurrent herpes simplex virus infections should receive prophylactic antiviral therapy.¹²

Muscle Control

An emerging concept in rejuvenation of the lower face recognizes not only restoration of volume but also control of muscle movement. Local injection of botulinum toxin type A induces relaxation of hyperfunctional facial muscles through temporary inhibition of neurotransmitter release.⁶ The potential for paralysis of the oral cavity may limit the application of botulinum toxin type A in that region.⁷ Nonetheless, the off-label potential of botulinum toxin type A has expanded to include several targets in the lower face. The orbicularis oris muscle is targeted to soften perioral rhytides. Conservative dosing (1–2 U per lip quadrant or approximately 5 U total) and superficial injection is emphasized in this area.²⁷ Similarly, the depressor anguli oris muscle is targeted by injection of 4 U bilaterally to soften the marionette lines. In the chin area, the mentalis muscle can be targeted by injection of 2 U deep into each belly of the muscle to reduce the mental crease and dimpling.²⁸ Combination treatment with dermal filler and neurotoxin demonstrates effects that last longer than either modality alone without additional adverse events.²⁹ With combination therapy, guidelines suggest treating with filler first.²⁷

Conclusion

A greater understanding of the extrinsic and intrinsic factors that contribute to the structural and surface changes of the aging face coupled with a preference for minimally invasive procedures has revolutionized the dermatologist’s approach to perioral rejuvenation. Serving as a focal point of the face, the lips and perioral skin are well poised to benefit from this paradigm shift. A multifaceted approach utilizing dermal fillers and neurotoxins may be most appropriate and has demonstrated optimal outcomes in facial aesthetics.

Historically, a variety of tools have been used to alter one’s appearance for cultural or religious purposes or to conform to standards of beauty. As a defining feature of the face, the lips provide a unique opportunity for facial aesthetic enhancement. There has been a paradigm shift in medicine favoring preventative health and a desire to slow and even reverse the aging process.¹ Acknowledging that product technology, skill sets, and cultural ideals continually evolve, this article highlights perioral anatomy, explains aging of the lower face, and reviews techniques to achieve perioral rejuvenation through volume restoration and muscle control.

Perioral Anatomy

The layers of the lips include the epidermis, subcutaneous tissue, orbicularis oris muscle fibers, and mucosa. The upper lip extends from the base of the nose to the mucosa inferiorly and to the nasolabial folds laterally. The curvilinear lower lip extends from the mucosa to the mandible inferiorly and to the oral commissures laterally.² Circumferential at the vermilion-cutaneous junction, a raised area of pale skin known as the white roll accentuates the vermilion border and provides an important landmark during lip augmentation.³ At the upper lip, this elevation of the vermilion joins at a V-shaped depression centrally to form the Cupid’s bow. The cutaneous upper lip has 2 raised vertical pillars known as the philtral columns, which are formed from decussating fibers of the orbicularis oris muscle.² The resultant midline depression is the philtrum. These defining features of the upper lip are to be preserved during augmentation procedures (Figure 1).⁴

The superior and inferior labial arteries, both branches of the facial artery, supply the upper and lower lip, respectively. The anastomotic arch of the superior labial artery is susceptible to injury from deep injection of the upper lip between the muscle layer and mucosa; therefore, caution must be exercised in this area.⁵ Injections into the vermilion and lower lip can be safely performed with less concern for vascular compromise. The vermilion derives its red color from the translucency of capillaries in the superficial papillae.² The capillary plexus at the papillae and rich sensory nerve network render the lip a highly vascular and sensitive structure.

Aging of the Lower Face

Subcutaneous fat atrophy, loss of elasticity, gravitational forces, and remodeling of the skeletal foundation all contribute to aging of the lower face. Starting as early as the third decade of life, intrinsic factors including hormonal changes and genetically determined processes produce alterations in skin quality and structure. Similarly, extrinsic aging through environmental influences, namely exposure to UV radiation and smoking, accelerate the loss of skin integrity.⁶

The decreased laxity of the skin in combination with repeated contraction of the orbicularis oris muscle results in perioral rhytides.⁷ For women in particular, vertically oriented perioral rhytides develop above the vermilion; terminal hair follicles, thicker skin, and a greater density of subcutaneous fat are presumptive protective factors for males.⁸ With time, the cutaneous portion of the upper lip lengthens and there is redistribution of volume with effacement of the upper lip vermilion.⁹ Additionally, the demarcation of the vermilion becomes blurred secondary to pallor, flattening of the philtral columns, and loss of projection of the Cupid’s bow.¹⁰

Downturning of the oral commissures is observed secondary to a combination of gravity, bone resorption, and soft tissue volume loss. Hyperactivity of the depressor anguli oris muscle exacerbates the mesolabial folds, producing marionette lines and a saddened expression.⁷ With ongoing volume loss and ligament laxity, tissue redistributes near the jaws and chin, giving rise to jowls. Similarly, perioral volume loss and descent of the malar fat-pad deepen the nasolabial folds in the aging midface.⁶

The main objective of perioral rejuvenation is to reinstate a harmonious refreshed look to the lower face; however, aesthetic analysis should occur within the context of the face as a whole, as the lips should complement the surrounding perioral cosmetic unit and overall skeletal foundation of the face. To accomplish this goal, the dermatologist’s armamentarium contains a broad variety of approaches including restriction of muscle movement, volume restoration, and surface contouring.

Volume Restoration

Treatment Options

In 2015, hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers constituted 80% of all injectable soft-tissue fillers, an 8% increase from 2014.¹¹ Hyaluronic acid has achieved immense popularity as a temporary dermal filler given its biocompatibility, longevity, and reversibility via hyaluronidase.¹²

Hyaluronic acid is a naturally occurring glycosaminoglycan that comprises the connective tissue matrix. The molecular composition affords HA its hydrophilic property, which augments dermal volume.⁷ Endogenous HA has a short half-life, and chemical modification by a cross-linking process extends longevity by 6 to 12 months. The various HA fillers are distinguished by method of purification, size of molecules, concentration and degree of cross-linking, and viscosity.^7,13,14 These differences dictate overall clinical performance such as flow properties, longevity, and stability. As a general rule, a high-viscosity product is more appropriate for deeper augmentation; fillers with low viscosity are more appropriate for correction of shallow defects.¹ Table 1 lists the HA fillers that are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for lip augmentation and/or perioral rhytides in adults 21 years and older.^15-17

Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy, longevity, and tolerability of different HA products are lacking in the literature and, where present, have strong industry influence.^18,19 The advent of assessment scales has provided an objective evaluation of perioral and lip augmentation, facilitating comparisons between products in both clinical research and practice.²⁰

Semipermanent biostimulatory dermal fillers such as calcium hydroxylapatite and poly-L-lactic acid are not recommended for lip augmentation due to an increased incidence of submucosal nodule formation.^6,14,21 Likewise, permanent fillers are not recommended given their irreversibility and risk of nodule formation around the lips.^14,22 Nonetheless, liquid silicone (purified polydimethylsiloxane) administered via a microdroplet technique (0.01 mL of silicone at a time, no more than 1 cc per lip per session) has been used off label as a permanent filling agent for lip augmentation with limited complications.²³ Regardless, trepidations about its use with respect to reported risks continue to limit its application.²²

Similarly, surgical lip implants such as expanded polytetrafluoroethylene is an option for a subset of patients desiring permanent enhancement but are less commonly utilized given the side-effect profile, irreversibility, and relatively invasive nature of the procedure.²² Lastly, autologous fat transfer has been used in correction of the nasolabial and mesolabial folds as well as in lip augmentation; however, irregular surface contours and unpredictable longevity secondary to postinjection resorption (20%–90%) has limited its popularity.^3,14,21

HA Injection Technique

With respect to HA fillers in the perioral area, numerous approaches have been described.^10,22 The techniques in Table 2 provide a foundation for lip rejuvenation.

Several injection techniques exist, including serial puncture, linear threading, cross-hatching, and fanning in a retrograde or anterograde manner.²⁴ A blunt microcannula (27 gauge, 38 mm) may be used in place of sharp needles and offers the benefit of increased patient comfort, reduced edema and ecchymosis, and shortened recovery period.^25,26 Gentle massage of the product after injection can assist with an even contour. Lastly, a key determinant of successful outcomes is using an adequate volume of HA filler (1–2 mL for shaping the vermilion border and volumizing the lips).²⁷ Figure 2 highlights a clinical example of HA filler for lip augmentation.

Fortunately, most complications encountered with HA lip augmentation are mild and transient. The most commonly observed side effects include injection-site reactions such as pain, erythema, and edema. Similarly, most adverse effects are related to injection technique. All HA fillers are prone to the Tyndall effect, a consequence of too superficial an injection plane. Patients with history of recurrent herpes simplex virus infections should receive prophylactic antiviral therapy.¹²

Muscle Control

An emerging concept in rejuvenation of the lower face recognizes not only restoration of volume but also control of muscle movement. Local injection of botulinum toxin type A induces relaxation of hyperfunctional facial muscles through temporary inhibition of neurotransmitter release.⁶ The potential for paralysis of the oral cavity may limit the application of botulinum toxin type A in that region.⁷ Nonetheless, the off-label potential of botulinum toxin type A has expanded to include several targets in the lower face. The orbicularis oris muscle is targeted to soften perioral rhytides. Conservative dosing (1–2 U per lip quadrant or approximately 5 U total) and superficial injection is emphasized in this area.²⁷ Similarly, the depressor anguli oris muscle is targeted by injection of 4 U bilaterally to soften the marionette lines. In the chin area, the mentalis muscle can be targeted by injection of 2 U deep into each belly of the muscle to reduce the mental crease and dimpling.²⁸ Combination treatment with dermal filler and neurotoxin demonstrates effects that last longer than either modality alone without additional adverse events.²⁹ With combination therapy, guidelines suggest treating with filler first.²⁷

Conclusion

A greater understanding of the extrinsic and intrinsic factors that contribute to the structural and surface changes of the aging face coupled with a preference for minimally invasive procedures has revolutionized the dermatologist’s approach to perioral rejuvenation. Serving as a focal point of the face, the lips and perioral skin are well poised to benefit from this paradigm shift. A multifaceted approach utilizing dermal fillers and neurotoxins may be most appropriate and has demonstrated optimal outcomes in facial aesthetics.

More than 40 AGA members, representing 24 states, visited Capitol Hill earlier this fall to fight for the science and practice of gastroenterology during AGA’s annual Advocacy Day.

NIH funding

AGA members met with lawmakers and their staffs on Sept. 16 to discuss the success that research and medical breakthroughs have had for their patients and encouraged Congress to support increased funding for NIH. Many members of Congress support increased funding for NIH, but a small group of House members is preventing passage of a bill that would increase funding for the institute by $1.25 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2017. The Senate Appropriations Committee passed a bill in June, on a vote of 29-1, to increase funding for NIH by $2 billion. Advocacy Day attendees urged their congressional offices to support the higher Senate number.

MACRA implementation

Members also discussed the need for congressional oversight to ensure that the Medicare Access & CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) law is being implemented as Congress intended. They shared their concerns over the impact this law could have on gastroenterologists, especially those in small or solo practices, and emphasized the need for CMS to provide flexibility to physicians to enable them to comply with the new requirements.

Participants highlighted the recent announcement that CMS will allow physicians more options for reporting in the first year as a positive sign that it is listening to the concerns voiced by Congress and the physician community on the regulatory burdens. AGA members also discussed the barriers that currently exist in qualifying as a specialty-focused alternative payment model (APM) and the need for continued flexibility to ensure that all physicians have the opportunity to participate in more value-based payment models.

Virtual advocacy

In conjunction with the Capitol Hill meetings, all AGA members were invited to participate in a Virtual Advocacy Day campaign. This additional component allowed all members to contact their members of Congress via email to voice their concerns about sustainable NIH funding for FY 2017 and the need for more congressional oversight of MACRA.

It’s not too late for you to show your support for the science and practice of GI. Contact your congressional representatives in support of important issues at www.gastroadvocacy.org/actionalerts.aspx.

More than 40 AGA members, representing 24 states, visited Capitol Hill earlier this fall to fight for the science and practice of gastroenterology during AGA’s annual Advocacy Day.

NIH funding

AGA members met with lawmakers and their staffs on Sept. 16 to discuss the success that research and medical breakthroughs have had for their patients and encouraged Congress to support increased funding for NIH. Many members of Congress support increased funding for NIH, but a small group of House members is preventing passage of a bill that would increase funding for the institute by $1.25 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2017. The Senate Appropriations Committee passed a bill in June, on a vote of 29-1, to increase funding for NIH by $2 billion. Advocacy Day attendees urged their congressional offices to support the higher Senate number.

MACRA implementation

Members also discussed the need for congressional oversight to ensure that the Medicare Access & CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) law is being implemented as Congress intended. They shared their concerns over the impact this law could have on gastroenterologists, especially those in small or solo practices, and emphasized the need for CMS to provide flexibility to physicians to enable them to comply with the new requirements.

Participants highlighted the recent announcement that CMS will allow physicians more options for reporting in the first year as a positive sign that it is listening to the concerns voiced by Congress and the physician community on the regulatory burdens. AGA members also discussed the barriers that currently exist in qualifying as a specialty-focused alternative payment model (APM) and the need for continued flexibility to ensure that all physicians have the opportunity to participate in more value-based payment models.

Virtual advocacy

In conjunction with the Capitol Hill meetings, all AGA members were invited to participate in a Virtual Advocacy Day campaign. This additional component allowed all members to contact their members of Congress via email to voice their concerns about sustainable NIH funding for FY 2017 and the need for more congressional oversight of MACRA.

It’s not too late for you to show your support for the science and practice of GI. Contact your congressional representatives in support of important issues at www.gastroadvocacy.org/actionalerts.aspx.

More than 40 AGA members, representing 24 states, visited Capitol Hill earlier this fall to fight for the science and practice of gastroenterology during AGA’s annual Advocacy Day.

NIH funding

AGA members met with lawmakers and their staffs on Sept. 16 to discuss the success that research and medical breakthroughs have had for their patients and encouraged Congress to support increased funding for NIH. Many members of Congress support increased funding for NIH, but a small group of House members is preventing passage of a bill that would increase funding for the institute by $1.25 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2017. The Senate Appropriations Committee passed a bill in June, on a vote of 29-1, to increase funding for NIH by $2 billion. Advocacy Day attendees urged their congressional offices to support the higher Senate number.

MACRA implementation

Members also discussed the need for congressional oversight to ensure that the Medicare Access & CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) law is being implemented as Congress intended. They shared their concerns over the impact this law could have on gastroenterologists, especially those in small or solo practices, and emphasized the need for CMS to provide flexibility to physicians to enable them to comply with the new requirements.

Participants highlighted the recent announcement that CMS will allow physicians more options for reporting in the first year as a positive sign that it is listening to the concerns voiced by Congress and the physician community on the regulatory burdens. AGA members also discussed the barriers that currently exist in qualifying as a specialty-focused alternative payment model (APM) and the need for continued flexibility to ensure that all physicians have the opportunity to participate in more value-based payment models.

Virtual advocacy

In conjunction with the Capitol Hill meetings, all AGA members were invited to participate in a Virtual Advocacy Day campaign. This additional component allowed all members to contact their members of Congress via email to voice their concerns about sustainable NIH funding for FY 2017 and the need for more congressional oversight of MACRA.

It’s not too late for you to show your support for the science and practice of GI. Contact your congressional representatives in support of important issues at www.gastroadvocacy.org/actionalerts.aspx.

AGA is committed to your success in gastroenterology. Make sure to renew your membership at www.gastro.org/renew to maintain your benefits and stay up to date on the latest discoveries in GI through subscriptions to leading publications. These include Gastroenterology, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, as well as members-only publications covering leading trends in the field.

Renew today and also maintain access to the AGA Community forum, where you can share topics and challenges spanning the GI landscape. You can also sign up for up to 6 of 13 section affiliations to discuss the needs and issues facing GI professionals.

Take advantage of these and other career-enhancing, members-only benefits like valuable patient care resources or research funding and publishing opportunities.

Renew before the Dec. 1 deadline.

While renewing your membership, please take a moment to update your AGA member profile and communications preferences to receive content customized to your needs and interests.

If you have any questions, please contact AGA Member Relations and Constituency Programs at [email protected] or 301-941-2651.
 

AGA is committed to your success in gastroenterology. Make sure to renew your membership at www.gastro.org/renew to maintain your benefits and stay up to date on the latest discoveries in GI through subscriptions to leading publications. These include Gastroenterology, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, as well as members-only publications covering leading trends in the field.

Renew today and also maintain access to the AGA Community forum, where you can share topics and challenges spanning the GI landscape. You can also sign up for up to 6 of 13 section affiliations to discuss the needs and issues facing GI professionals.

Take advantage of these and other career-enhancing, members-only benefits like valuable patient care resources or research funding and publishing opportunities.

Renew before the Dec. 1 deadline.

While renewing your membership, please take a moment to update your AGA member profile and communications preferences to receive content customized to your needs and interests.

If you have any questions, please contact AGA Member Relations and Constituency Programs at [email protected] or 301-941-2651.
 

AGA is committed to your success in gastroenterology. Make sure to renew your membership at www.gastro.org/renew to maintain your benefits and stay up to date on the latest discoveries in GI through subscriptions to leading publications. These include Gastroenterology, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, as well as members-only publications covering leading trends in the field.

Renew today and also maintain access to the AGA Community forum, where you can share topics and challenges spanning the GI landscape. You can also sign up for up to 6 of 13 section affiliations to discuss the needs and issues facing GI professionals.

Take advantage of these and other career-enhancing, members-only benefits like valuable patient care resources or research funding and publishing opportunities.

Renew before the Dec. 1 deadline.

While renewing your membership, please take a moment to update your AGA member profile and communications preferences to receive content customized to your needs and interests.

If you have any questions, please contact AGA Member Relations and Constituency Programs at [email protected] or 301-941-2651.
 

The AGA Research Foundation plays an important role in medical research by providing grants to young scientists at a critical time in their careers. In the 2016 research award cycle, the foundation provided more than $2.5 million in research award support to 66 scientists. We funded four Research Scholar Award (RSA) recipients; outside of the RSAs, the foundation provided several other funding vehicles for individuals ranging from high school students to established investigators.

With the support of our donors, we are building a community of researchers whose work serves the greater community and benefits all our patients. Here are just a few of the investigators the AGA Research Foundation is funding.
 

“I would like to thank the AGA Research Foundation and its donors for their generous support. This award is a critical step in allowing me to develop an infrastructure to support future research examining additional lifestyle risk factors for IBS.” – He will use this research funding to evaluate the association of early-life risk factors and risk of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in prospective multicenter cohorts.

“I am extremely honored to have received this award. This grant is instrumental in my career development as a physician-scientist working in the gut microbiome field. The opportunities and resources this award affords will gear me toward achieving my research goals.” – His research project aims to investigate the role of bacterial urease, which hydrolyzes host-derived urea into ammonia in the colon, in host and gut microbiota amino acid metabolism.

“I would like to thank the AGA Research Foundation for giving me this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to conduct valuable research under the mantles of so many well-known scientists in the GI field. This award motivates me to continue to strive for excellence in my professional pursuits.” – Elizabeth notes receiving this grant will enable more students from her university to embark on research activities.

Support talented investigators in gastroenterology and hepatology like Drs. Kyle Staller and Ting-Chin Shen, and student Elizabeth Edouard through the AGA Research Foundation. Make a tax-deductible donation today at www.gastro.org/donateonline.

The AGA Research Foundation plays an important role in medical research by providing grants to young scientists at a critical time in their careers. In the 2016 research award cycle, the foundation provided more than $2.5 million in research award support to 66 scientists. We funded four Research Scholar Award (RSA) recipients; outside of the RSAs, the foundation provided several other funding vehicles for individuals ranging from high school students to established investigators.

With the support of our donors, we are building a community of researchers whose work serves the greater community and benefits all our patients. Here are just a few of the investigators the AGA Research Foundation is funding.
 

“I would like to thank the AGA Research Foundation and its donors for their generous support. This award is a critical step in allowing me to develop an infrastructure to support future research examining additional lifestyle risk factors for IBS.” – He will use this research funding to evaluate the association of early-life risk factors and risk of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in prospective multicenter cohorts.

“I am extremely honored to have received this award. This grant is instrumental in my career development as a physician-scientist working in the gut microbiome field. The opportunities and resources this award affords will gear me toward achieving my research goals.” – His research project aims to investigate the role of bacterial urease, which hydrolyzes host-derived urea into ammonia in the colon, in host and gut microbiota amino acid metabolism.

“I would like to thank the AGA Research Foundation for giving me this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to conduct valuable research under the mantles of so many well-known scientists in the GI field. This award motivates me to continue to strive for excellence in my professional pursuits.” – Elizabeth notes receiving this grant will enable more students from her university to embark on research activities.

Support talented investigators in gastroenterology and hepatology like Drs. Kyle Staller and Ting-Chin Shen, and student Elizabeth Edouard through the AGA Research Foundation. Make a tax-deductible donation today at www.gastro.org/donateonline.

The AGA Research Foundation plays an important role in medical research by providing grants to young scientists at a critical time in their careers. In the 2016 research award cycle, the foundation provided more than $2.5 million in research award support to 66 scientists. We funded four Research Scholar Award (RSA) recipients; outside of the RSAs, the foundation provided several other funding vehicles for individuals ranging from high school students to established investigators.

With the support of our donors, we are building a community of researchers whose work serves the greater community and benefits all our patients. Here are just a few of the investigators the AGA Research Foundation is funding.
 

“I would like to thank the AGA Research Foundation and its donors for their generous support. This award is a critical step in allowing me to develop an infrastructure to support future research examining additional lifestyle risk factors for IBS.” – He will use this research funding to evaluate the association of early-life risk factors and risk of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in prospective multicenter cohorts.

“I am extremely honored to have received this award. This grant is instrumental in my career development as a physician-scientist working in the gut microbiome field. The opportunities and resources this award affords will gear me toward achieving my research goals.” – His research project aims to investigate the role of bacterial urease, which hydrolyzes host-derived urea into ammonia in the colon, in host and gut microbiota amino acid metabolism.

“I would like to thank the AGA Research Foundation for giving me this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to conduct valuable research under the mantles of so many well-known scientists in the GI field. This award motivates me to continue to strive for excellence in my professional pursuits.” – Elizabeth notes receiving this grant will enable more students from her university to embark on research activities.

Support talented investigators in gastroenterology and hepatology like Drs. Kyle Staller and Ting-Chin Shen, and student Elizabeth Edouard through the AGA Research Foundation. Make a tax-deductible donation today at www.gastro.org/donateonline.

HILTON HEAD, SC—Physicians sometimes order unnecessary medical tests and procedures for their patients, which results in wasteful spending and inappropriate care. Following medical associations’ practice recommendations, which have been collected by the Choosing Wisely initiative, can help physicians reduce waste in the health care system and provide appropriate treatment for patients, according to an overview presented at the 39th Annual Contemporary Clinical Neurology Symposium.

Avoiding Unnecessary Treatments and Tests

The American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation created the Choosing Wisely website to encourage dialogue between physicians and patients about the overuse of treatments and tests. An additional goal was to empower patients to make informed treatment decisions. More than 70 societies, including the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) and the American Headache Society, submitted recommendations to advise patients and clinicians about proper healthcare. “You can find a list of all the organizations that contributed on the Choosing Wisely website, and each one was asked to contribute five different topics for Choosing Wisely,” said Peter Donofrio, MD, Professor of Neurology at Vanderbilt University in Nashville.

The AAN recommends that clinicians not perform an EEG for headaches. In addition, the organization recommends that physicians not perform imaging of the carotid arteries for simple syncope without other neurologic symptoms. For patients with migraine, opioids or butalbital treatment should be a last resort. The AAN also recommends that doctors not prescribe interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate for patients with disability resulting from progressive, nonrelapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, because the drugs are ineffective. Finally, it advises doctors not to recommend carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis unless the complication rate from surgery is less than 3%.

The American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine recommends that physicians not perform MRI scans of the brain or spine for patients with peripheral neuropathy without signs of cerebral or spinal cord disease. In addition, the association discourages physicians from performing nerve conduction studies (NCSs) without a needle EMG for radiculopathy assessment. It also recommends that physicians not order or perform four-limb EMG/NCS testing for neck or back pain after trauma.

Treating Acute Low Back Pain and Headache

Other medical associations have made recommendations regarding the assessment and treatment of acute low back pain and headache. The North American Spine Society does not recommend advanced imaging of the spine within the first six weeks in patients with nonspecific acute low back pain in the absence of red flags.

The American Headache Society (AHS) recommends that physicians avoid advising prolonged or frequent use of over-the-counter pain medications for headache. The organization also discourages physicians from prescribing opioid or butalbital-containing medications as first-line treatment for recurrent headache disorders. Furthermore, it does not recommend surgical deactivation of migraine trigger points outside of a clinical trial. In addition, the society advises physicians not to perform CT imaging for headache when an MRI is available, except in emergency settings. The society also recommends that physicians should not perform neuroimaging studies for patients with stable headaches that meet migraine criteria.

When CT Scans Are Unnecessary in Children

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) advises that CT scans and MRI scans are not necessary in a child with simple febrile seizure. The AAP also does not recommend CT scans for the immediate evaluation of minor head injuries; clinical observation and Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) criteria should be used to determine whether imaging is indicated.

Treating Insomnia and Sleep Disorders

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine advises doctors not to prescribe medication for childhood insomnia, which usually arises from parent–child interactions and responds to behavioral intervention. In addition, the academy does not recommend the use of hypnotics as a primary therapy for chronic insomnia in adults; instead, it advises physicians to offer cognitive behavioral therapy and reserve medication for adjunctive treatment when necessary. It recommends that a polysomnography be avoided in chronic insomnia unless symptoms suggest a comorbid sleep disorder. Additional Choosing Wisely recommendations are available at www.choosingwisely.org.

—Erica Tricarico

Suggested Reading

Callaghan BC, De Lott LB, Kerber KA, et al. Neurology Choosing Wisely recommendations: 74 and growing. Neurol Clin Pract. 2015;5(5):439-447.

Langer-Gould AM, Anderson WE, Armstrong MJ, et al. The American Academy of Neurology’s top five choosing wisely recommendations. Neurology. 2013;81(11):1004-1011.

Loder E, Weisenbaum E, Fishberg B, et al. Choosing wisely in headache medicine: the American Headache Society’s list of five things physicians and patients should question. Headache. 2013;53(10):1651-1659.

HILTON HEAD, SC—Physicians sometimes order unnecessary medical tests and procedures for their patients, which results in wasteful spending and inappropriate care. Following medical associations’ practice recommendations, which have been collected by the Choosing Wisely initiative, can help physicians reduce waste in the health care system and provide appropriate treatment for patients, according to an overview presented at the 39th Annual Contemporary Clinical Neurology Symposium.

Avoiding Unnecessary Treatments and Tests

The American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation created the Choosing Wisely website to encourage dialogue between physicians and patients about the overuse of treatments and tests. An additional goal was to empower patients to make informed treatment decisions. More than 70 societies, including the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) and the American Headache Society, submitted recommendations to advise patients and clinicians about proper healthcare. “You can find a list of all the organizations that contributed on the Choosing Wisely website, and each one was asked to contribute five different topics for Choosing Wisely,” said Peter Donofrio, MD, Professor of Neurology at Vanderbilt University in Nashville.

The AAN recommends that clinicians not perform an EEG for headaches. In addition, the organization recommends that physicians not perform imaging of the carotid arteries for simple syncope without other neurologic symptoms. For patients with migraine, opioids or butalbital treatment should be a last resort. The AAN also recommends that doctors not prescribe interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate for patients with disability resulting from progressive, nonrelapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, because the drugs are ineffective. Finally, it advises doctors not to recommend carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis unless the complication rate from surgery is less than 3%.

The American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine recommends that physicians not perform MRI scans of the brain or spine for patients with peripheral neuropathy without signs of cerebral or spinal cord disease. In addition, the association discourages physicians from performing nerve conduction studies (NCSs) without a needle EMG for radiculopathy assessment. It also recommends that physicians not order or perform four-limb EMG/NCS testing for neck or back pain after trauma.

Treating Acute Low Back Pain and Headache

Other medical associations have made recommendations regarding the assessment and treatment of acute low back pain and headache. The North American Spine Society does not recommend advanced imaging of the spine within the first six weeks in patients with nonspecific acute low back pain in the absence of red flags.

The American Headache Society (AHS) recommends that physicians avoid advising prolonged or frequent use of over-the-counter pain medications for headache. The organization also discourages physicians from prescribing opioid or butalbital-containing medications as first-line treatment for recurrent headache disorders. Furthermore, it does not recommend surgical deactivation of migraine trigger points outside of a clinical trial. In addition, the society advises physicians not to perform CT imaging for headache when an MRI is available, except in emergency settings. The society also recommends that physicians should not perform neuroimaging studies for patients with stable headaches that meet migraine criteria.

When CT Scans Are Unnecessary in Children

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) advises that CT scans and MRI scans are not necessary in a child with simple febrile seizure. The AAP also does not recommend CT scans for the immediate evaluation of minor head injuries; clinical observation and Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) criteria should be used to determine whether imaging is indicated.

Treating Insomnia and Sleep Disorders

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine advises doctors not to prescribe medication for childhood insomnia, which usually arises from parent–child interactions and responds to behavioral intervention. In addition, the academy does not recommend the use of hypnotics as a primary therapy for chronic insomnia in adults; instead, it advises physicians to offer cognitive behavioral therapy and reserve medication for adjunctive treatment when necessary. It recommends that a polysomnography be avoided in chronic insomnia unless symptoms suggest a comorbid sleep disorder. Additional Choosing Wisely recommendations are available at www.choosingwisely.org.

—Erica Tricarico

Suggested Reading

Callaghan BC, De Lott LB, Kerber KA, et al. Neurology Choosing Wisely recommendations: 74 and growing. Neurol Clin Pract. 2015;5(5):439-447.

Langer-Gould AM, Anderson WE, Armstrong MJ, et al. The American Academy of Neurology’s top five choosing wisely recommendations. Neurology. 2013;81(11):1004-1011.

Loder E, Weisenbaum E, Fishberg B, et al. Choosing wisely in headache medicine: the American Headache Society’s list of five things physicians and patients should question. Headache. 2013;53(10):1651-1659.

HILTON HEAD, SC—Physicians sometimes order unnecessary medical tests and procedures for their patients, which results in wasteful spending and inappropriate care. Following medical associations’ practice recommendations, which have been collected by the Choosing Wisely initiative, can help physicians reduce waste in the health care system and provide appropriate treatment for patients, according to an overview presented at the 39th Annual Contemporary Clinical Neurology Symposium.

Avoiding Unnecessary Treatments and Tests

The American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation created the Choosing Wisely website to encourage dialogue between physicians and patients about the overuse of treatments and tests. An additional goal was to empower patients to make informed treatment decisions. More than 70 societies, including the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) and the American Headache Society, submitted recommendations to advise patients and clinicians about proper healthcare. “You can find a list of all the organizations that contributed on the Choosing Wisely website, and each one was asked to contribute five different topics for Choosing Wisely,” said Peter Donofrio, MD, Professor of Neurology at Vanderbilt University in Nashville.

The AAN recommends that clinicians not perform an EEG for headaches. In addition, the organization recommends that physicians not perform imaging of the carotid arteries for simple syncope without other neurologic symptoms. For patients with migraine, opioids or butalbital treatment should be a last resort. The AAN also recommends that doctors not prescribe interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate for patients with disability resulting from progressive, nonrelapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, because the drugs are ineffective. Finally, it advises doctors not to recommend carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis unless the complication rate from surgery is less than 3%.

The American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine recommends that physicians not perform MRI scans of the brain or spine for patients with peripheral neuropathy without signs of cerebral or spinal cord disease. In addition, the association discourages physicians from performing nerve conduction studies (NCSs) without a needle EMG for radiculopathy assessment. It also recommends that physicians not order or perform four-limb EMG/NCS testing for neck or back pain after trauma.

Treating Acute Low Back Pain and Headache

Other medical associations have made recommendations regarding the assessment and treatment of acute low back pain and headache. The North American Spine Society does not recommend advanced imaging of the spine within the first six weeks in patients with nonspecific acute low back pain in the absence of red flags.

The American Headache Society (AHS) recommends that physicians avoid advising prolonged or frequent use of over-the-counter pain medications for headache. The organization also discourages physicians from prescribing opioid or butalbital-containing medications as first-line treatment for recurrent headache disorders. Furthermore, it does not recommend surgical deactivation of migraine trigger points outside of a clinical trial. In addition, the society advises physicians not to perform CT imaging for headache when an MRI is available, except in emergency settings. The society also recommends that physicians should not perform neuroimaging studies for patients with stable headaches that meet migraine criteria.

When CT Scans Are Unnecessary in Children

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) advises that CT scans and MRI scans are not necessary in a child with simple febrile seizure. The AAP also does not recommend CT scans for the immediate evaluation of minor head injuries; clinical observation and Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) criteria should be used to determine whether imaging is indicated.

Treating Insomnia and Sleep Disorders

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine advises doctors not to prescribe medication for childhood insomnia, which usually arises from parent–child interactions and responds to behavioral intervention. In addition, the academy does not recommend the use of hypnotics as a primary therapy for chronic insomnia in adults; instead, it advises physicians to offer cognitive behavioral therapy and reserve medication for adjunctive treatment when necessary. It recommends that a polysomnography be avoided in chronic insomnia unless symptoms suggest a comorbid sleep disorder. Additional Choosing Wisely recommendations are available at www.choosingwisely.org.

—Erica Tricarico

Suggested Reading

Callaghan BC, De Lott LB, Kerber KA, et al. Neurology Choosing Wisely recommendations: 74 and growing. Neurol Clin Pract. 2015;5(5):439-447.

Langer-Gould AM, Anderson WE, Armstrong MJ, et al. The American Academy of Neurology’s top five choosing wisely recommendations. Neurology. 2013;81(11):1004-1011.

Loder E, Weisenbaum E, Fishberg B, et al. Choosing wisely in headache medicine: the American Headache Society’s list of five things physicians and patients should question. Headache. 2013;53(10):1651-1659.

Tattoos have been viewed as one of the most exotic forms of art for thousands of years. In ancient times, tattoos were used mainly for therapeutic and status purposes. According to British archeologist Joann Fletcher, the oldest evidence of tattoo use was found on the famous “Iceman,” a 5200-year-old frozen mummy that was discovered more than 20 years ago.¹ Tattoos were thought to be a form of therapy used to decrease joint pain. On the other hand, the ancient Egyptians used tattoos as symbols of wealth and high status; surprisingly, only women were tattooed. Fletcher also reported that tattoos were used as a form of therapy during pregnancy in upper-class women.¹

Tattoos have served different purposes in the last few centuries, making their way to the United States at the start of the 20th century.² New York City became the tattoo capital of the country. During this early period, male artists often would tattoo their wives so that they could advertise their work. After the Prohibition era, tattoos became widely used within the US Military, becoming a way to show pride and patriotism.²

Due to the permanent nature of tattoos, we sought to understand the reasons for obtaining this particular genre of body art. The purpose of this study was to provide a greater understanding of the current demographics of individuals who get tattoos, looking at specific trends in age and level of education of those who get tattoos as well as the motivation for tattoo placement. As dermatologists, it is essential to understand this patient population to be able to provide services (ie, tattoo removal) in the safe setting of a physician’s office.

Methods

The study was conducted at a private dermatology clinic in the Chicago (Illinois) metropolitan area with no institutional review board approval. Between January 2011 and December 2012, local patients with at least 1 tattoo were asked, with assumed consent, to fill out an investigator-developed survey containing 18 multiple-choice questions regarding age, educational and family background, and other factors. The race and gender of the respondents as well as the number of patients who declined to complete the survey were not recorded.

Results

A total of 363 patients completed the in-person survey. Responses were tabulated and converted into percentages for comparison (N=363). Data analysis was divided into 3 parameters: education level, health concerns, and motivation for getting a tattoo. Figure 1 shows that 70% of respondents had obtained a college degree or higher.

With regard to health concerns associated with tattoos, the majority of respondents (71%) claimed they were not concerned with the health risks (eg, infection with human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis C virus) associated with getting a tattoo. Also, only 6% of respondents admitted to being under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of getting a tattoo. Of 21 respondents who claimed drugs and/or alcohol were part of their tattoo experience, the highest level of education was high school in 7 respondents and 2 got their first tattoo when they were younger than 14 years.

Survey results revealed that the majority of respondents got a tattoo as an act of rememberance (Figure 2). For example, one respondent reported getting a tattoo for religious purposes, while another got a tattoo to celebrate and mark each level of completed education (ie, high school, college, graduate school). However, a high percentage of respondents (26%) got a tattoo for fun.

Comment

Although ancient tattoos were used for therapeutic purposes, this study revealed that tattoos are now obtained by individuals with higher levels of education to remember a loved one or purely for enjoyment. The potential health risks associated with getting a tattoo did not deter the respondents in this study. Converse to the popular belief that individuals are under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol when getting a tattoo, our study found that only 6% of respondents were under the influence. A comparable trend was found among US military service members in a similar study.³ The majority of respondents did not regret their tattoos and did not report taking a mind-altering substance. Tattoos serve as a symbol of one’s proud individualism.³ However, a 2001 study found a correlation between greater use of alcohol and marijuana among college students with tattoos and piecings.⁴ These circumstances may lead patients to seek consultation from a dermatologist for tattoo removal. Therefore, it is important to have a better understanding of this particular patient population to facilitate care in an efficient manner.

Evaluation of the gender and race of survey respondents would be useful in the future. Financial status of respondents also may be explored, as wealth and status were used by the ancient Egyptians to determine who could get a tattoo. A follow-up analysis on removal of tattoos also will be explored in the future.

Tattoos have been viewed as one of the most exotic forms of art for thousands of years. In ancient times, tattoos were used mainly for therapeutic and status purposes. According to British archeologist Joann Fletcher, the oldest evidence of tattoo use was found on the famous “Iceman,” a 5200-year-old frozen mummy that was discovered more than 20 years ago.¹ Tattoos were thought to be a form of therapy used to decrease joint pain. On the other hand, the ancient Egyptians used tattoos as symbols of wealth and high status; surprisingly, only women were tattooed. Fletcher also reported that tattoos were used as a form of therapy during pregnancy in upper-class women.¹

Tattoos have served different purposes in the last few centuries, making their way to the United States at the start of the 20th century.² New York City became the tattoo capital of the country. During this early period, male artists often would tattoo their wives so that they could advertise their work. After the Prohibition era, tattoos became widely used within the US Military, becoming a way to show pride and patriotism.²

Due to the permanent nature of tattoos, we sought to understand the reasons for obtaining this particular genre of body art. The purpose of this study was to provide a greater understanding of the current demographics of individuals who get tattoos, looking at specific trends in age and level of education of those who get tattoos as well as the motivation for tattoo placement. As dermatologists, it is essential to understand this patient population to be able to provide services (ie, tattoo removal) in the safe setting of a physician’s office.

Methods

The study was conducted at a private dermatology clinic in the Chicago (Illinois) metropolitan area with no institutional review board approval. Between January 2011 and December 2012, local patients with at least 1 tattoo were asked, with assumed consent, to fill out an investigator-developed survey containing 18 multiple-choice questions regarding age, educational and family background, and other factors. The race and gender of the respondents as well as the number of patients who declined to complete the survey were not recorded.

Results

A total of 363 patients completed the in-person survey. Responses were tabulated and converted into percentages for comparison (N=363). Data analysis was divided into 3 parameters: education level, health concerns, and motivation for getting a tattoo. Figure 1 shows that 70% of respondents had obtained a college degree or higher.

With regard to health concerns associated with tattoos, the majority of respondents (71%) claimed they were not concerned with the health risks (eg, infection with human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis C virus) associated with getting a tattoo. Also, only 6% of respondents admitted to being under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of getting a tattoo. Of 21 respondents who claimed drugs and/or alcohol were part of their tattoo experience, the highest level of education was high school in 7 respondents and 2 got their first tattoo when they were younger than 14 years.

Survey results revealed that the majority of respondents got a tattoo as an act of rememberance (Figure 2). For example, one respondent reported getting a tattoo for religious purposes, while another got a tattoo to celebrate and mark each level of completed education (ie, high school, college, graduate school). However, a high percentage of respondents (26%) got a tattoo for fun.

Comment

Although ancient tattoos were used for therapeutic purposes, this study revealed that tattoos are now obtained by individuals with higher levels of education to remember a loved one or purely for enjoyment. The potential health risks associated with getting a tattoo did not deter the respondents in this study. Converse to the popular belief that individuals are under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol when getting a tattoo, our study found that only 6% of respondents were under the influence. A comparable trend was found among US military service members in a similar study.³ The majority of respondents did not regret their tattoos and did not report taking a mind-altering substance. Tattoos serve as a symbol of one’s proud individualism.³ However, a 2001 study found a correlation between greater use of alcohol and marijuana among college students with tattoos and piecings.⁴ These circumstances may lead patients to seek consultation from a dermatologist for tattoo removal. Therefore, it is important to have a better understanding of this particular patient population to facilitate care in an efficient manner.

Evaluation of the gender and race of survey respondents would be useful in the future. Financial status of respondents also may be explored, as wealth and status were used by the ancient Egyptians to determine who could get a tattoo. A follow-up analysis on removal of tattoos also will be explored in the future.

Tattoos have been viewed as one of the most exotic forms of art for thousands of years. In ancient times, tattoos were used mainly for therapeutic and status purposes. According to British archeologist Joann Fletcher, the oldest evidence of tattoo use was found on the famous “Iceman,” a 5200-year-old frozen mummy that was discovered more than 20 years ago.¹ Tattoos were thought to be a form of therapy used to decrease joint pain. On the other hand, the ancient Egyptians used tattoos as symbols of wealth and high status; surprisingly, only women were tattooed. Fletcher also reported that tattoos were used as a form of therapy during pregnancy in upper-class women.¹

Tattoos have served different purposes in the last few centuries, making their way to the United States at the start of the 20th century.² New York City became the tattoo capital of the country. During this early period, male artists often would tattoo their wives so that they could advertise their work. After the Prohibition era, tattoos became widely used within the US Military, becoming a way to show pride and patriotism.²

Due to the permanent nature of tattoos, we sought to understand the reasons for obtaining this particular genre of body art. The purpose of this study was to provide a greater understanding of the current demographics of individuals who get tattoos, looking at specific trends in age and level of education of those who get tattoos as well as the motivation for tattoo placement. As dermatologists, it is essential to understand this patient population to be able to provide services (ie, tattoo removal) in the safe setting of a physician’s office.

Methods

The study was conducted at a private dermatology clinic in the Chicago (Illinois) metropolitan area with no institutional review board approval. Between January 2011 and December 2012, local patients with at least 1 tattoo were asked, with assumed consent, to fill out an investigator-developed survey containing 18 multiple-choice questions regarding age, educational and family background, and other factors. The race and gender of the respondents as well as the number of patients who declined to complete the survey were not recorded.

Results

A total of 363 patients completed the in-person survey. Responses were tabulated and converted into percentages for comparison (N=363). Data analysis was divided into 3 parameters: education level, health concerns, and motivation for getting a tattoo. Figure 1 shows that 70% of respondents had obtained a college degree or higher.

With regard to health concerns associated with tattoos, the majority of respondents (71%) claimed they were not concerned with the health risks (eg, infection with human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis C virus) associated with getting a tattoo. Also, only 6% of respondents admitted to being under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of getting a tattoo. Of 21 respondents who claimed drugs and/or alcohol were part of their tattoo experience, the highest level of education was high school in 7 respondents and 2 got their first tattoo when they were younger than 14 years.

Survey results revealed that the majority of respondents got a tattoo as an act of rememberance (Figure 2). For example, one respondent reported getting a tattoo for religious purposes, while another got a tattoo to celebrate and mark each level of completed education (ie, high school, college, graduate school). However, a high percentage of respondents (26%) got a tattoo for fun.

Comment

Although ancient tattoos were used for therapeutic purposes, this study revealed that tattoos are now obtained by individuals with higher levels of education to remember a loved one or purely for enjoyment. The potential health risks associated with getting a tattoo did not deter the respondents in this study. Converse to the popular belief that individuals are under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol when getting a tattoo, our study found that only 6% of respondents were under the influence. A comparable trend was found among US military service members in a similar study.³ The majority of respondents did not regret their tattoos and did not report taking a mind-altering substance. Tattoos serve as a symbol of one’s proud individualism.³ However, a 2001 study found a correlation between greater use of alcohol and marijuana among college students with tattoos and piecings.⁴ These circumstances may lead patients to seek consultation from a dermatologist for tattoo removal. Therefore, it is important to have a better understanding of this particular patient population to facilitate care in an efficient manner.

Evaluation of the gender and race of survey respondents would be useful in the future. Financial status of respondents also may be explored, as wealth and status were used by the ancient Egyptians to determine who could get a tattoo. A follow-up analysis on removal of tattoos also will be explored in the future.

Due to a submission error, the article “A Boxed Warning for Inadequate Psoriasis Treatment” (Cutis. 2016;98:206-207) did not contain the complete author disclosure information. The corrected disclosure statement appears below:

Ms. Kagha and Ms. Anderson report no conflict of interest. Dr. Blauvelt has served as a clinical study investigator and scientific adviser for AbbVie Inc; Amgen, Inc; Boehringer Ingelheim; Celgene Corporation; Dermira Inc; Eli Lilly and Company; Genentech, Inc; GlaxoSmithKline; Janssen Biotech, Inc; Merck & Co; Novartis; Pfizer Inc; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc; Sandoz, a Novartis Division; Sanofi; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd; UCB; and Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc, as well as a paid speaker for Eli Lilly and Company. Dr. Leonardi has served as an advisory board member and consultant for AbbVie Inc; Amgen, Inc; Boehringer Ingelheim; Dermira Inc; Eli Lilly and Company; Janssen Biotech, Inc; LEO Pharma; Pfizer Inc; Sandoz, a Novartis Division; UCB; and Vitae Pharmaceuticals. He also has been an investigator for AbbVie Inc; Actavis Pharma, Inc; Amgen, Inc; Boehringer Ingelheim; Celgene Corporation; Coherus BioSciences; Corrona, LLC; Dermira Inc; Eli Lilly and Company; Galderma Laboratories, LP; Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc; Janssen Biotech, Inc; LEO Pharma; Merck & Co; Novartis; Pfizer Inc; Sandoz, a Novartis Division; Stiefel, a GSK company; and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Leonardi also has been on the speaker’s bureau for AbbVie Inc; Celgene Corporation; Eli Lilly and Company; and Novartis. Dr. Feldman is a consultant, researcher, and/or speaker for AbbVie Inc; Amgen, Inc; Baxter; Boehringer Ingelheim; Celgene Corporation; Janssen Biotech, Inc; Merck & Co; Mylan; Novartis; Pfizer Inc; and Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.

The staff of Cutis^® makes every possible effort to ensure accuracy in its articles and apologizes for the mistake.

Due to a submission error, the article “A Boxed Warning for Inadequate Psoriasis Treatment” (Cutis. 2016;98:206-207) did not contain the complete author disclosure information. The corrected disclosure statement appears below:

Ms. Kagha and Ms. Anderson report no conflict of interest. Dr. Blauvelt has served as a clinical study investigator and scientific adviser for AbbVie Inc; Amgen, Inc; Boehringer Ingelheim; Celgene Corporation; Dermira Inc; Eli Lilly and Company; Genentech, Inc; GlaxoSmithKline; Janssen Biotech, Inc; Merck & Co; Novartis; Pfizer Inc; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc; Sandoz, a Novartis Division; Sanofi; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd; UCB; and Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc, as well as a paid speaker for Eli Lilly and Company. Dr. Leonardi has served as an advisory board member and consultant for AbbVie Inc; Amgen, Inc; Boehringer Ingelheim; Dermira Inc; Eli Lilly and Company; Janssen Biotech, Inc; LEO Pharma; Pfizer Inc; Sandoz, a Novartis Division; UCB; and Vitae Pharmaceuticals. He also has been an investigator for AbbVie Inc; Actavis Pharma, Inc; Amgen, Inc; Boehringer Ingelheim; Celgene Corporation; Coherus BioSciences; Corrona, LLC; Dermira Inc; Eli Lilly and Company; Galderma Laboratories, LP; Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc; Janssen Biotech, Inc; LEO Pharma; Merck & Co; Novartis; Pfizer Inc; Sandoz, a Novartis Division; Stiefel, a GSK company; and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Leonardi also has been on the speaker’s bureau for AbbVie Inc; Celgene Corporation; Eli Lilly and Company; and Novartis. Dr. Feldman is a consultant, researcher, and/or speaker for AbbVie Inc; Amgen, Inc; Baxter; Boehringer Ingelheim; Celgene Corporation; Janssen Biotech, Inc; Merck & Co; Mylan; Novartis; Pfizer Inc; and Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.

The staff of Cutis^® makes every possible effort to ensure accuracy in its articles and apologizes for the mistake.

Due to a submission error, the article “A Boxed Warning for Inadequate Psoriasis Treatment” (Cutis. 2016;98:206-207) did not contain the complete author disclosure information. The corrected disclosure statement appears below:

Ms. Kagha and Ms. Anderson report no conflict of interest. Dr. Blauvelt has served as a clinical study investigator and scientific adviser for AbbVie Inc; Amgen, Inc; Boehringer Ingelheim; Celgene Corporation; Dermira Inc; Eli Lilly and Company; Genentech, Inc; GlaxoSmithKline; Janssen Biotech, Inc; Merck & Co; Novartis; Pfizer Inc; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc; Sandoz, a Novartis Division; Sanofi; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd; UCB; and Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc, as well as a paid speaker for Eli Lilly and Company. Dr. Leonardi has served as an advisory board member and consultant for AbbVie Inc; Amgen, Inc; Boehringer Ingelheim; Dermira Inc; Eli Lilly and Company; Janssen Biotech, Inc; LEO Pharma; Pfizer Inc; Sandoz, a Novartis Division; UCB; and Vitae Pharmaceuticals. He also has been an investigator for AbbVie Inc; Actavis Pharma, Inc; Amgen, Inc; Boehringer Ingelheim; Celgene Corporation; Coherus BioSciences; Corrona, LLC; Dermira Inc; Eli Lilly and Company; Galderma Laboratories, LP; Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc; Janssen Biotech, Inc; LEO Pharma; Merck & Co; Novartis; Pfizer Inc; Sandoz, a Novartis Division; Stiefel, a GSK company; and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Leonardi also has been on the speaker’s bureau for AbbVie Inc; Celgene Corporation; Eli Lilly and Company; and Novartis. Dr. Feldman is a consultant, researcher, and/or speaker for AbbVie Inc; Amgen, Inc; Baxter; Boehringer Ingelheim; Celgene Corporation; Janssen Biotech, Inc; Merck & Co; Mylan; Novartis; Pfizer Inc; and Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.

The staff of Cutis^® makes every possible effort to ensure accuracy in its articles and apologizes for the mistake.

Two commonly used drugs to prevent migraine in adults, amitriptyline and topiramate, proved no better than placebo at preventing migraine in children and adolescents and also were associated with more adverse events in the double-blind, randomized Childhood and Adolescent Migraine Prevention (CHAMP) trial.

The findings of the trial, which was stopped early for futility following a recommendation from a data and safety monitoring board, suggest the adult model of migraine treatment in which both drugs have been effective may not apply to pediatric patients, according to the investigators (N Engl J Med 2016 Oct 27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610384). The study was published simultaneously with its presentation at the annual meeting of the Child Neurology Society in Vancouver.

Monkey Business Images Ltd./Thinkstock

Two commonly used drugs to prevent migraine in adults, amitriptyline and topiramate, proved no better than placebo at preventing migraine in children and adolescents and also were associated with more adverse events in the double-blind, randomized Childhood and Adolescent Migraine Prevention (CHAMP) trial.

The findings of the trial, which was stopped early for futility following a recommendation from a data and safety monitoring board, suggest the adult model of migraine treatment in which both drugs have been effective may not apply to pediatric patients, according to the investigators (N Engl J Med 2016 Oct 27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610384). The study was published simultaneously with its presentation at the annual meeting of the Child Neurology Society in Vancouver.

Monkey Business Images Ltd./Thinkstock

Two commonly used drugs to prevent migraine in adults, amitriptyline and topiramate, proved no better than placebo at preventing migraine in children and adolescents and also were associated with more adverse events in the double-blind, randomized Childhood and Adolescent Migraine Prevention (CHAMP) trial.

The findings of the trial, which was stopped early for futility following a recommendation from a data and safety monitoring board, suggest the adult model of migraine treatment in which both drugs have been effective may not apply to pediatric patients, according to the investigators (N Engl J Med 2016 Oct 27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610384). The study was published simultaneously with its presentation at the annual meeting of the Child Neurology Society in Vancouver.

Monkey Business Images Ltd./Thinkstock

It is an exciting time for dermatologists. In the 16 years that I have been in practice our knowledge of disease pathogenesis has increased and has shaped treatments that can now offer life-changing improvement for patients with extensive dermatologic disease. The everyday practice of cosmetic dermatology also has advanced. Sixteen years ago the only cosmetic options we had for our patients were bovine or human collagen injections, traditional CO₂ laser resurfacing, and the older generations of pulsed dye lasers. Neuromodulators were just being introduced. We quickly learned the limitations and complications associated with these modalities. Collagen injections were directed at fine perioral lines and lasted 3 to 4 months. The worst complication would be a bruise or an allergic reaction to the bovine collagen. If we really needed to restore volume beyond the perioral regions, our only option was autologous fat transfer. CO₂ laser resurfacing was used to firm skin, erase deep wrinkles, and improve sun damage, but its use was limited to older, fair-skinned individuals due to the inherent risk for hypopigmentation and depigmentation. Pulsed dye lasers similarly had no means of cooling the skin, thus they were limited to lighter-skinned individuals and had notable risk for blisters, burns, and hypopigmentation. Since then, our understanding of skin healing, laser-tissue interaction, and facial aging has driven the field to new heights of technological advances and safety. Just as I tell my patients and residents, there is no better time to be in this field than at this moment. Dermatologists have driven the advances behind many of the technologies that are now in widespread use among physicians in a variety of specialties.

Our understanding of facial aging has evolved to include the complex interplay of skeletal change, fat atrophy, and skin aging, which must all be considered when improving a patient’s appearance. Fillers have evolved in physical characteristics to give us the ability to choose between lift, spread, neocollagenesis, or water absorption. Thus, we can select the proper filler for the specific anatomic area we are rejuvenating.

Our understanding of photoaging and laser-tissue physics has allowed for the development of a newer generation of lasers ranging from fractionated lasers to noninvasive modalities that can safely be used in a variety of ethnic skin types to address acne scars, wrinkles, and inflammatory processes such as acne and rosacea. Similarly, the desire to tighten redundant skin has continued to drive ultrasound and radiofrequency technology and sparked growth in a newer field of cryolipolysis and chemical lipolysis agents.

Our dialogue with patients also has evolved to include the 4 R’s of antiaging: resurfacing the skin (eg, lasers, peels), refilling the lost volume (eg, fillers, fat), redraping the excess skin (eg, radiofrequency, ultrasound, laser, surgery), and relaxing dynamic lines (eg, neuromodulators). I propose an additional R: renewal! We must focus on the need for constant renewal so that patients maintain the results we have achieved. I apply the analogy of exercising to get into shape. One must go to the gym regularly to get to the desired level of fitness, but you do not stop exercising, otherwise you will quickly relapse to your former lack of fitness. Similarly, patients should receive the appropriate treatments to bring them to the desired level of rejuvenation, but then some form of constant renewal process is needed to maintain them at that level. Without the stimulation of the skin, the aging process continues and the cycle begins all over again.

In my practice, renewal is achieved by driving the skin to maintain the glow and smoothness that enhances the results of the fillers, neuromodulators, lasers, and peels that we have used. The skin is the first thing people notice. Without the glow, the patient will look good but not great. I tell patients that this part of the process is their responsibility. They must adhere to the skin care regimen specifically designed to address their needs. By incorporating the patient in the rejuvenation process, he/she is empowered to take control over the aging process and has grown more confident in you as a physician.

These are exciting times and there is still so much in the pipeline. By continually learning, reading, and attending workshops and meetings, you can make sure our specialty continue to be the leader in the antiaging field.

It is an exciting time for dermatologists. In the 16 years that I have been in practice our knowledge of disease pathogenesis has increased and has shaped treatments that can now offer life-changing improvement for patients with extensive dermatologic disease. The everyday practice of cosmetic dermatology also has advanced. Sixteen years ago the only cosmetic options we had for our patients were bovine or human collagen injections, traditional CO₂ laser resurfacing, and the older generations of pulsed dye lasers. Neuromodulators were just being introduced. We quickly learned the limitations and complications associated with these modalities. Collagen injections were directed at fine perioral lines and lasted 3 to 4 months. The worst complication would be a bruise or an allergic reaction to the bovine collagen. If we really needed to restore volume beyond the perioral regions, our only option was autologous fat transfer. CO₂ laser resurfacing was used to firm skin, erase deep wrinkles, and improve sun damage, but its use was limited to older, fair-skinned individuals due to the inherent risk for hypopigmentation and depigmentation. Pulsed dye lasers similarly had no means of cooling the skin, thus they were limited to lighter-skinned individuals and had notable risk for blisters, burns, and hypopigmentation. Since then, our understanding of skin healing, laser-tissue interaction, and facial aging has driven the field to new heights of technological advances and safety. Just as I tell my patients and residents, there is no better time to be in this field than at this moment. Dermatologists have driven the advances behind many of the technologies that are now in widespread use among physicians in a variety of specialties.

Our understanding of facial aging has evolved to include the complex interplay of skeletal change, fat atrophy, and skin aging, which must all be considered when improving a patient’s appearance. Fillers have evolved in physical characteristics to give us the ability to choose between lift, spread, neocollagenesis, or water absorption. Thus, we can select the proper filler for the specific anatomic area we are rejuvenating.

Our understanding of photoaging and laser-tissue physics has allowed for the development of a newer generation of lasers ranging from fractionated lasers to noninvasive modalities that can safely be used in a variety of ethnic skin types to address acne scars, wrinkles, and inflammatory processes such as acne and rosacea. Similarly, the desire to tighten redundant skin has continued to drive ultrasound and radiofrequency technology and sparked growth in a newer field of cryolipolysis and chemical lipolysis agents.

Our dialogue with patients also has evolved to include the 4 R’s of antiaging: resurfacing the skin (eg, lasers, peels), refilling the lost volume (eg, fillers, fat), redraping the excess skin (eg, radiofrequency, ultrasound, laser, surgery), and relaxing dynamic lines (eg, neuromodulators). I propose an additional R: renewal! We must focus on the need for constant renewal so that patients maintain the results we have achieved. I apply the analogy of exercising to get into shape. One must go to the gym regularly to get to the desired level of fitness, but you do not stop exercising, otherwise you will quickly relapse to your former lack of fitness. Similarly, patients should receive the appropriate treatments to bring them to the desired level of rejuvenation, but then some form of constant renewal process is needed to maintain them at that level. Without the stimulation of the skin, the aging process continues and the cycle begins all over again.

In my practice, renewal is achieved by driving the skin to maintain the glow and smoothness that enhances the results of the fillers, neuromodulators, lasers, and peels that we have used. The skin is the first thing people notice. Without the glow, the patient will look good but not great. I tell patients that this part of the process is their responsibility. They must adhere to the skin care regimen specifically designed to address their needs. By incorporating the patient in the rejuvenation process, he/she is empowered to take control over the aging process and has grown more confident in you as a physician.

These are exciting times and there is still so much in the pipeline. By continually learning, reading, and attending workshops and meetings, you can make sure our specialty continue to be the leader in the antiaging field.

It is an exciting time for dermatologists. In the 16 years that I have been in practice our knowledge of disease pathogenesis has increased and has shaped treatments that can now offer life-changing improvement for patients with extensive dermatologic disease. The everyday practice of cosmetic dermatology also has advanced. Sixteen years ago the only cosmetic options we had for our patients were bovine or human collagen injections, traditional CO₂ laser resurfacing, and the older generations of pulsed dye lasers. Neuromodulators were just being introduced. We quickly learned the limitations and complications associated with these modalities. Collagen injections were directed at fine perioral lines and lasted 3 to 4 months. The worst complication would be a bruise or an allergic reaction to the bovine collagen. If we really needed to restore volume beyond the perioral regions, our only option was autologous fat transfer. CO₂ laser resurfacing was used to firm skin, erase deep wrinkles, and improve sun damage, but its use was limited to older, fair-skinned individuals due to the inherent risk for hypopigmentation and depigmentation. Pulsed dye lasers similarly had no means of cooling the skin, thus they were limited to lighter-skinned individuals and had notable risk for blisters, burns, and hypopigmentation. Since then, our understanding of skin healing, laser-tissue interaction, and facial aging has driven the field to new heights of technological advances and safety. Just as I tell my patients and residents, there is no better time to be in this field than at this moment. Dermatologists have driven the advances behind many of the technologies that are now in widespread use among physicians in a variety of specialties.

Our understanding of facial aging has evolved to include the complex interplay of skeletal change, fat atrophy, and skin aging, which must all be considered when improving a patient’s appearance. Fillers have evolved in physical characteristics to give us the ability to choose between lift, spread, neocollagenesis, or water absorption. Thus, we can select the proper filler for the specific anatomic area we are rejuvenating.

Our understanding of photoaging and laser-tissue physics has allowed for the development of a newer generation of lasers ranging from fractionated lasers to noninvasive modalities that can safely be used in a variety of ethnic skin types to address acne scars, wrinkles, and inflammatory processes such as acne and rosacea. Similarly, the desire to tighten redundant skin has continued to drive ultrasound and radiofrequency technology and sparked growth in a newer field of cryolipolysis and chemical lipolysis agents.

Our dialogue with patients also has evolved to include the 4 R’s of antiaging: resurfacing the skin (eg, lasers, peels), refilling the lost volume (eg, fillers, fat), redraping the excess skin (eg, radiofrequency, ultrasound, laser, surgery), and relaxing dynamic lines (eg, neuromodulators). I propose an additional R: renewal! We must focus on the need for constant renewal so that patients maintain the results we have achieved. I apply the analogy of exercising to get into shape. One must go to the gym regularly to get to the desired level of fitness, but you do not stop exercising, otherwise you will quickly relapse to your former lack of fitness. Similarly, patients should receive the appropriate treatments to bring them to the desired level of rejuvenation, but then some form of constant renewal process is needed to maintain them at that level. Without the stimulation of the skin, the aging process continues and the cycle begins all over again.

In my practice, renewal is achieved by driving the skin to maintain the glow and smoothness that enhances the results of the fillers, neuromodulators, lasers, and peels that we have used. The skin is the first thing people notice. Without the glow, the patient will look good but not great. I tell patients that this part of the process is their responsibility. They must adhere to the skin care regimen specifically designed to address their needs. By incorporating the patient in the rejuvenation process, he/she is empowered to take control over the aging process and has grown more confident in you as a physician.

These are exciting times and there is still so much in the pipeline. By continually learning, reading, and attending workshops and meetings, you can make sure our specialty continue to be the leader in the antiaging field.

SAN FRANCISCO – Among the most significant concerns associated with youth’s increasing use of screen media is the impact on their sleep, according to two policy statements of the American Academy of Pediatrics on children and media use.

To help pediatricians better understand how media might affect sleep, Sujay Kansagra, MD, a pediatric neurologist at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., presented an overview of circadian rhythm disorders and how to address them during a program on electronic media at the AAP annual meeting.

maewjpho/Thinkstock

• A significant delay in major sleep episode in relation to desired or required sleep time and waking time (often involving a sleep time around 4 a.m.).

• The symptoms are present for more than 3 months.

• When allowed to choose a schedule, the person will exhibit improved sleep quality/duration and maintain delayed phase.

• A sleep log and/or actigraphy demonstrates a delay in timing of the sleep period for at least 7 days.

Because nearly all screen media emit light, use of such media in the evenings may contribute to this disorder. “When you combine light exposure with someone who has that later chronotype, you’re setting yourself up for disaster,” Dr. Kansagra said.

Delayed sleep-wake phase disorder can greatly interfere with school, work, and normal daily activities, and Dr. Kansagra outlined the major steps in preventing and/or treating it, starting with avoiding light exposure at night, whether from the TV, tablets, laptops, or cell phones.

“If they can’t avoid light completely, the brightness is also important,” he said. “We know that the brighter the light, the more likely you are to suppress your brain’s melatonin.” Therefore, reducing the brightness on devices that must be used can mitigate the problem, as can using red- or yellow-tinted light, provided as a “night mode” on some devices, instead of the blue light emitted by the majority of devices.

Next, he recommended that individuals maintain a set bedtime and wake time each day, including on the weekends. Although he acknowledged the challenge this schedule might present, particularly in teenagers, he described how detrimental it can be to stay up late and sleep in late on the weekends. If teens stay up until 11 p.m. throughout the week, then a little later on Friday night, and then up to 2 a.m. on Saturday night, they will likely sleep in until around 11 a.m. on Sunday. But if they need to get up at 6 a.m. for school Monday morning, that’s the equivalent of flying from Hawaii to New York in terms of jet lag effects, he explained.

“They will spend the rest of the school week slowly advancing their clock until the weekend and do it all over again,” Dr. Kansagra said. “They are perpetually jet lagged. No wonder they’re so angry all the time,” he joked. “It’s social jet lag.”

Such social jet lag leads to sleepiness throughout the week, often mistaken for laziness by frustrated parents, he said.

“Sleepiness is not laziness,” he emphasized. “It’s a problem with the quality or quantity of sleep. It’s really important to get parents’ buy in on this because it’s a contentious topic in a lot of families.”

After getting the child or teen on a regular schedule, the next important step in realigning a circadian rhythm and then maintaining it is to expose the person to light early in the morning – but after that temperature nadir that occurs 3 hours before waking. Meanwhile, 2-6 hours before their sleep time, youth trying to adjust their clocks can take a low dose of melatonin, around 0.5-1 mg. But he pointed out a common misconception about how melatonin works.

“Melatonin plays no role in fixing insomnia; melatonin doesn’t make you sleepy,” Dr. Kansagra said. “Melatonin just tells your brain what to do when it’s dark. Melatonin is good for shifting your circadian rhythm.”

But all of these steps can be successful only if the pediatrician and/or parent can convince the child or teen that it’s important to adjust their circadian rhythm. This can include discussions that lead them to realize or conclude that they are unpleasant, angry, or irritable when they don’t get enough sleep. Perhaps they have been told they are rude by a classmate on days they don’t get enough sleep, or perhaps they realize they do not perform as well while playing sports when they don’t have the rest they need. Children who can make those connections can help get the buy in needed to follow all the previous steps.

Some individuals, however, can be particularly resistant to adjusting the circadian rhythm, which calls for a much more dramatic and difficult treatment called chronotherapy. This treatment begins very counterintuitively by flipping the script: The youth should now actually try to stay up later than their bedtime while playing video games, watching TV, using a computer, or engaging in similar activities. Ideally, they should stay up until 6 a.m. and then sleep in as late as they wish.

The next evening, they should stay up even later – until 8 a.m. – and again sleep in as late as they need to. Each successive day, they should go to bed 2 hours later – 10 a.m., 12 p.m., 2 p.m., and so forth – and sleep the adequate amount anyone would need, until they eventually are going to bed at the time they should be, such as 8 p.m. or 10 p.m. Although this is a dramatic treatment, it can be very effective at resetting a person’s clock when other methods have not succeeded, he said.

The key practice-altering elements of Dr. Kansagra’s talk focused on using melatonin as a “clock-shifting” medication instead of a “sleep-inducing one” and dosing children at the appropriate time, 2-6 hours before bed. If nighttime use of light cannot be eliminated, have patients reduce the brightness and duration, and change the color, of the light to lessen its effect on the brain’s melatonin release. Finally, help families understand the concept of “social jet lag” so they grasp the importance of regular sleep times and do not mistake sleepiness for laziness.

Dr. Kansagra reported no relevant financial disclosures or external funding.


SAN FRANCISCO – Among the most significant concerns associated with youth’s increasing use of screen media is the impact on their sleep, according to two policy statements of the American Academy of Pediatrics on children and media use.

To help pediatricians better understand how media might affect sleep, Sujay Kansagra, MD, a pediatric neurologist at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., presented an overview of circadian rhythm disorders and how to address them during a program on electronic media at the AAP annual meeting.

maewjpho/Thinkstock

• A significant delay in major sleep episode in relation to desired or required sleep time and waking time (often involving a sleep time around 4 a.m.).

• The symptoms are present for more than 3 months.

• When allowed to choose a schedule, the person will exhibit improved sleep quality/duration and maintain delayed phase.

• A sleep log and/or actigraphy demonstrates a delay in timing of the sleep period for at least 7 days.

Because nearly all screen media emit light, use of such media in the evenings may contribute to this disorder. “When you combine light exposure with someone who has that later chronotype, you’re setting yourself up for disaster,” Dr. Kansagra said.

Delayed sleep-wake phase disorder can greatly interfere with school, work, and normal daily activities, and Dr. Kansagra outlined the major steps in preventing and/or treating it, starting with avoiding light exposure at night, whether from the TV, tablets, laptops, or cell phones.

“If they can’t avoid light completely, the brightness is also important,” he said. “We know that the brighter the light, the more likely you are to suppress your brain’s melatonin.” Therefore, reducing the brightness on devices that must be used can mitigate the problem, as can using red- or yellow-tinted light, provided as a “night mode” on some devices, instead of the blue light emitted by the majority of devices.

Next, he recommended that individuals maintain a set bedtime and wake time each day, including on the weekends. Although he acknowledged the challenge this schedule might present, particularly in teenagers, he described how detrimental it can be to stay up late and sleep in late on the weekends. If teens stay up until 11 p.m. throughout the week, then a little later on Friday night, and then up to 2 a.m. on Saturday night, they will likely sleep in until around 11 a.m. on Sunday. But if they need to get up at 6 a.m. for school Monday morning, that’s the equivalent of flying from Hawaii to New York in terms of jet lag effects, he explained.

“They will spend the rest of the school week slowly advancing their clock until the weekend and do it all over again,” Dr. Kansagra said. “They are perpetually jet lagged. No wonder they’re so angry all the time,” he joked. “It’s social jet lag.”

Such social jet lag leads to sleepiness throughout the week, often mistaken for laziness by frustrated parents, he said.

“Sleepiness is not laziness,” he emphasized. “It’s a problem with the quality or quantity of sleep. It’s really important to get parents’ buy in on this because it’s a contentious topic in a lot of families.”

After getting the child or teen on a regular schedule, the next important step in realigning a circadian rhythm and then maintaining it is to expose the person to light early in the morning – but after that temperature nadir that occurs 3 hours before waking. Meanwhile, 2-6 hours before their sleep time, youth trying to adjust their clocks can take a low dose of melatonin, around 0.5-1 mg. But he pointed out a common misconception about how melatonin works.

“Melatonin plays no role in fixing insomnia; melatonin doesn’t make you sleepy,” Dr. Kansagra said. “Melatonin just tells your brain what to do when it’s dark. Melatonin is good for shifting your circadian rhythm.”

But all of these steps can be successful only if the pediatrician and/or parent can convince the child or teen that it’s important to adjust their circadian rhythm. This can include discussions that lead them to realize or conclude that they are unpleasant, angry, or irritable when they don’t get enough sleep. Perhaps they have been told they are rude by a classmate on days they don’t get enough sleep, or perhaps they realize they do not perform as well while playing sports when they don’t have the rest they need. Children who can make those connections can help get the buy in needed to follow all the previous steps.

Some individuals, however, can be particularly resistant to adjusting the circadian rhythm, which calls for a much more dramatic and difficult treatment called chronotherapy. This treatment begins very counterintuitively by flipping the script: The youth should now actually try to stay up later than their bedtime while playing video games, watching TV, using a computer, or engaging in similar activities. Ideally, they should stay up until 6 a.m. and then sleep in as late as they wish.

The next evening, they should stay up even later – until 8 a.m. – and again sleep in as late as they need to. Each successive day, they should go to bed 2 hours later – 10 a.m., 12 p.m., 2 p.m., and so forth – and sleep the adequate amount anyone would need, until they eventually are going to bed at the time they should be, such as 8 p.m. or 10 p.m. Although this is a dramatic treatment, it can be very effective at resetting a person’s clock when other methods have not succeeded, he said.

The key practice-altering elements of Dr. Kansagra’s talk focused on using melatonin as a “clock-shifting” medication instead of a “sleep-inducing one” and dosing children at the appropriate time, 2-6 hours before bed. If nighttime use of light cannot be eliminated, have patients reduce the brightness and duration, and change the color, of the light to lessen its effect on the brain’s melatonin release. Finally, help families understand the concept of “social jet lag” so they grasp the importance of regular sleep times and do not mistake sleepiness for laziness.

Dr. Kansagra reported no relevant financial disclosures or external funding.


SAN FRANCISCO – Among the most significant concerns associated with youth’s increasing use of screen media is the impact on their sleep, according to two policy statements of the American Academy of Pediatrics on children and media use.

To help pediatricians better understand how media might affect sleep, Sujay Kansagra, MD, a pediatric neurologist at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., presented an overview of circadian rhythm disorders and how to address them during a program on electronic media at the AAP annual meeting.

maewjpho/Thinkstock

• A significant delay in major sleep episode in relation to desired or required sleep time and waking time (often involving a sleep time around 4 a.m.).

• The symptoms are present for more than 3 months.

• When allowed to choose a schedule, the person will exhibit improved sleep quality/duration and maintain delayed phase.

• A sleep log and/or actigraphy demonstrates a delay in timing of the sleep period for at least 7 days.

Because nearly all screen media emit light, use of such media in the evenings may contribute to this disorder. “When you combine light exposure with someone who has that later chronotype, you’re setting yourself up for disaster,” Dr. Kansagra said.

Delayed sleep-wake phase disorder can greatly interfere with school, work, and normal daily activities, and Dr. Kansagra outlined the major steps in preventing and/or treating it, starting with avoiding light exposure at night, whether from the TV, tablets, laptops, or cell phones.

“If they can’t avoid light completely, the brightness is also important,” he said. “We know that the brighter the light, the more likely you are to suppress your brain’s melatonin.” Therefore, reducing the brightness on devices that must be used can mitigate the problem, as can using red- or yellow-tinted light, provided as a “night mode” on some devices, instead of the blue light emitted by the majority of devices.

Next, he recommended that individuals maintain a set bedtime and wake time each day, including on the weekends. Although he acknowledged the challenge this schedule might present, particularly in teenagers, he described how detrimental it can be to stay up late and sleep in late on the weekends. If teens stay up until 11 p.m. throughout the week, then a little later on Friday night, and then up to 2 a.m. on Saturday night, they will likely sleep in until around 11 a.m. on Sunday. But if they need to get up at 6 a.m. for school Monday morning, that’s the equivalent of flying from Hawaii to New York in terms of jet lag effects, he explained.

“They will spend the rest of the school week slowly advancing their clock until the weekend and do it all over again,” Dr. Kansagra said. “They are perpetually jet lagged. No wonder they’re so angry all the time,” he joked. “It’s social jet lag.”

Such social jet lag leads to sleepiness throughout the week, often mistaken for laziness by frustrated parents, he said.

“Sleepiness is not laziness,” he emphasized. “It’s a problem with the quality or quantity of sleep. It’s really important to get parents’ buy in on this because it’s a contentious topic in a lot of families.”

After getting the child or teen on a regular schedule, the next important step in realigning a circadian rhythm and then maintaining it is to expose the person to light early in the morning – but after that temperature nadir that occurs 3 hours before waking. Meanwhile, 2-6 hours before their sleep time, youth trying to adjust their clocks can take a low dose of melatonin, around 0.5-1 mg. But he pointed out a common misconception about how melatonin works.

“Melatonin plays no role in fixing insomnia; melatonin doesn’t make you sleepy,” Dr. Kansagra said. “Melatonin just tells your brain what to do when it’s dark. Melatonin is good for shifting your circadian rhythm.”

But all of these steps can be successful only if the pediatrician and/or parent can convince the child or teen that it’s important to adjust their circadian rhythm. This can include discussions that lead them to realize or conclude that they are unpleasant, angry, or irritable when they don’t get enough sleep. Perhaps they have been told they are rude by a classmate on days they don’t get enough sleep, or perhaps they realize they do not perform as well while playing sports when they don’t have the rest they need. Children who can make those connections can help get the buy in needed to follow all the previous steps.

Some individuals, however, can be particularly resistant to adjusting the circadian rhythm, which calls for a much more dramatic and difficult treatment called chronotherapy. This treatment begins very counterintuitively by flipping the script: The youth should now actually try to stay up later than their bedtime while playing video games, watching TV, using a computer, or engaging in similar activities. Ideally, they should stay up until 6 a.m. and then sleep in as late as they wish.

The next evening, they should stay up even later – until 8 a.m. – and again sleep in as late as they need to. Each successive day, they should go to bed 2 hours later – 10 a.m., 12 p.m., 2 p.m., and so forth – and sleep the adequate amount anyone would need, until they eventually are going to bed at the time they should be, such as 8 p.m. or 10 p.m. Although this is a dramatic treatment, it can be very effective at resetting a person’s clock when other methods have not succeeded, he said.

The key practice-altering elements of Dr. Kansagra’s talk focused on using melatonin as a “clock-shifting” medication instead of a “sleep-inducing one” and dosing children at the appropriate time, 2-6 hours before bed. If nighttime use of light cannot be eliminated, have patients reduce the brightness and duration, and change the color, of the light to lessen its effect on the brain’s melatonin release. Finally, help families understand the concept of “social jet lag” so they grasp the importance of regular sleep times and do not mistake sleepiness for laziness.

Dr. Kansagra reported no relevant financial disclosures or external funding.