AHA wants e-cigarettes regulated but notes they help some smokers quit

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 13:54
Display Headline
AHA wants e-cigarettes regulated but notes they help some smokers quit

The American Heart Association has released its recommendations regarding the sale and usage of e-cigarettes, cautioning that the devices should be regulated to avoid enticing children to smoke while also saying that e-cigarettes could be used as a way to help some current smokers quit.

The guidelines, published online Aug. 24 in Circulation, state that clinicians "should not discourage" their patients from resorting to e-cigarettes if other approved forms of smoking cessation, such as the nicotine patch, have been exhausted. The AHA warned, however, that further studies are needed to fully understand the effects of e-cigarette usage, stressing that e-cigarettes have not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration as an acceptable smoking cessation device and could contain low amounts of toxic chemicals that would prove more harmful than helpful to patients in the long run.

©goldy/Thinkstockphotos.com
E-cigarettes may help some smokers quit, but more research is needed to fully understand the effects of e-cigarette usage, doctors said.

"E-cigarettes have caused a major shift in the tobacco-control landscape," Aruni Bhatnagar, Ph.D., lead author of the guidelines and chair of cardiovascular medicine at the University of Louisville, Ky., said in a statement. "It’s critical that we rigorously examine the long-term impact of this new technology on public health, cardiovascular disease, and stroke, and pay careful attention to the effect of e-cigarettes on adolescents."

For now, the AHA says that clinicians should tell their patients who use e-cigarettes to set a firm quit date, warning that any device that delivers nicotine into the body is harmful and likely lethal.

"Nicotine is a dangerous and highly addictive chemical no matter what form it takes – conventional cigarettes or some other tobacco product," Dr. Elliott Antman, AHA president, said in the statement. "Every life that has been lost to tobacco addiction" could have been saved, he noted.

To that end, the AHA also called for strong regulations regarding the potential marketability of e-cigarettes to youngsters. The group recommended a federal ban on the sale of e-cigarettes to minors, warning that the devices could become a gateway to actual cigarettes for young people who see e-cigarettes as "high-tech, accessible, and convenient," according to a JAMA Pediatrics study of 40,000 middle and high school students. The AHA also recommended that all existing rules and regulations in place for tobacco-related products should apply to e-cigarettes.

"We must protect future generations from any potential smokescreens in the tobacco product landscape that will cause us to lose precious ground in the fight to make our nation 100% tobacco-free," Dr. Antman said.

According to the AHA, 20 million Americans have lost their lives to tobacco over the last 50 years.

[email protected]

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
smoking, cigarette, e-cigarette, smoking cessation, tobacco, quit smoking,
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

The American Heart Association has released its recommendations regarding the sale and usage of e-cigarettes, cautioning that the devices should be regulated to avoid enticing children to smoke while also saying that e-cigarettes could be used as a way to help some current smokers quit.

The guidelines, published online Aug. 24 in Circulation, state that clinicians "should not discourage" their patients from resorting to e-cigarettes if other approved forms of smoking cessation, such as the nicotine patch, have been exhausted. The AHA warned, however, that further studies are needed to fully understand the effects of e-cigarette usage, stressing that e-cigarettes have not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration as an acceptable smoking cessation device and could contain low amounts of toxic chemicals that would prove more harmful than helpful to patients in the long run.

©goldy/Thinkstockphotos.com
E-cigarettes may help some smokers quit, but more research is needed to fully understand the effects of e-cigarette usage, doctors said.

"E-cigarettes have caused a major shift in the tobacco-control landscape," Aruni Bhatnagar, Ph.D., lead author of the guidelines and chair of cardiovascular medicine at the University of Louisville, Ky., said in a statement. "It’s critical that we rigorously examine the long-term impact of this new technology on public health, cardiovascular disease, and stroke, and pay careful attention to the effect of e-cigarettes on adolescents."

For now, the AHA says that clinicians should tell their patients who use e-cigarettes to set a firm quit date, warning that any device that delivers nicotine into the body is harmful and likely lethal.

"Nicotine is a dangerous and highly addictive chemical no matter what form it takes – conventional cigarettes or some other tobacco product," Dr. Elliott Antman, AHA president, said in the statement. "Every life that has been lost to tobacco addiction" could have been saved, he noted.

To that end, the AHA also called for strong regulations regarding the potential marketability of e-cigarettes to youngsters. The group recommended a federal ban on the sale of e-cigarettes to minors, warning that the devices could become a gateway to actual cigarettes for young people who see e-cigarettes as "high-tech, accessible, and convenient," according to a JAMA Pediatrics study of 40,000 middle and high school students. The AHA also recommended that all existing rules and regulations in place for tobacco-related products should apply to e-cigarettes.

"We must protect future generations from any potential smokescreens in the tobacco product landscape that will cause us to lose precious ground in the fight to make our nation 100% tobacco-free," Dr. Antman said.

According to the AHA, 20 million Americans have lost their lives to tobacco over the last 50 years.

[email protected]

The American Heart Association has released its recommendations regarding the sale and usage of e-cigarettes, cautioning that the devices should be regulated to avoid enticing children to smoke while also saying that e-cigarettes could be used as a way to help some current smokers quit.

The guidelines, published online Aug. 24 in Circulation, state that clinicians "should not discourage" their patients from resorting to e-cigarettes if other approved forms of smoking cessation, such as the nicotine patch, have been exhausted. The AHA warned, however, that further studies are needed to fully understand the effects of e-cigarette usage, stressing that e-cigarettes have not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration as an acceptable smoking cessation device and could contain low amounts of toxic chemicals that would prove more harmful than helpful to patients in the long run.

©goldy/Thinkstockphotos.com
E-cigarettes may help some smokers quit, but more research is needed to fully understand the effects of e-cigarette usage, doctors said.

"E-cigarettes have caused a major shift in the tobacco-control landscape," Aruni Bhatnagar, Ph.D., lead author of the guidelines and chair of cardiovascular medicine at the University of Louisville, Ky., said in a statement. "It’s critical that we rigorously examine the long-term impact of this new technology on public health, cardiovascular disease, and stroke, and pay careful attention to the effect of e-cigarettes on adolescents."

For now, the AHA says that clinicians should tell their patients who use e-cigarettes to set a firm quit date, warning that any device that delivers nicotine into the body is harmful and likely lethal.

"Nicotine is a dangerous and highly addictive chemical no matter what form it takes – conventional cigarettes or some other tobacco product," Dr. Elliott Antman, AHA president, said in the statement. "Every life that has been lost to tobacco addiction" could have been saved, he noted.

To that end, the AHA also called for strong regulations regarding the potential marketability of e-cigarettes to youngsters. The group recommended a federal ban on the sale of e-cigarettes to minors, warning that the devices could become a gateway to actual cigarettes for young people who see e-cigarettes as "high-tech, accessible, and convenient," according to a JAMA Pediatrics study of 40,000 middle and high school students. The AHA also recommended that all existing rules and regulations in place for tobacco-related products should apply to e-cigarettes.

"We must protect future generations from any potential smokescreens in the tobacco product landscape that will cause us to lose precious ground in the fight to make our nation 100% tobacco-free," Dr. Antman said.

According to the AHA, 20 million Americans have lost their lives to tobacco over the last 50 years.

[email protected]

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
AHA wants e-cigarettes regulated but notes they help some smokers quit
Display Headline
AHA wants e-cigarettes regulated but notes they help some smokers quit
Legacy Keywords
smoking, cigarette, e-cigarette, smoking cessation, tobacco, quit smoking,
Legacy Keywords
smoking, cigarette, e-cigarette, smoking cessation, tobacco, quit smoking,
Sections
Article Source

FROM CIRCULATION

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Gestational diabetes and the Barker Hypothesis

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/03/2022 - 15:47
Display Headline
Gestational diabetes and the Barker Hypothesis

Although there are some glimmers of hope that U.S. birthweights may be declining, the average infant birthweight has remained significantly tilted toward obesity. Moreover, and alarming number of infants, children, and adolescents are obese.

In 2007-2008, 9.5% of infants and toddlers were at or above the 95th percentile of the weight-for-recumbent-length growth charts. Among children and adolescents aged 2-19 years, 11.9% were at or above the 97th percentile of the body-mass-index-for-age growth charts; 16.9% were at or above the 95th percentile; and 31.7% were at or above the 85th percentile of BMI for age (JAMA 2010;303:242-9).

While more recent reports of obesity in children indicate a modest decline in obesity among 2- to 5-year-olds (JAMA 2014;311:806-14), an alarming number of infants and children have excess adiposity (roughly twice what is expected). In addition, cardiovascular mortality later in life continues to rise.

The question arises, have childhood and adult obesity rates remained high because mothers are feeding their children the wrong foods or because these children were born obese? One also wonders, with respect to cardiovascular mortality in adulthood, is the in utero environment playing a role?

 

 

Old lessons, growing relevance

More than 3 decades ago, the late British physician Dr. David Barker got us thinking about how a challenging life in the womb can set us up for downstream ill health. He studied births from 1910 to 1945 and found that the cardiovascular mortality of individuals born during that time was inversely related to birthweight. Smaller babies, he found, could have cardiovascular mortality risks that were double or even quadruple the risks of larger babies.

Dr. Barker theorized that, when faced with undernutrition, the fetus adapts by sending more blood to the brain and sacrificing blood flow to less essential tissues. His theory about how growth and nutrition before birth may affect the heart became known as the "Barker Hypothesis." It was initially controversial, but it led to an explosion of research – especially since 2000 – on various downstream effects of the intrauterine environment.

Investigators have learned that it is not only cardiovascular mortality that is affected by low birthweight, but also the risk of developing diabetes and being overweight. This is because the fetus makes less essential systems insulin resistant. Insulin resistance persists in the womb and after birth as well, predisposing individuals to insulin resistance and obesity, both of which are closely linked to the risk of metabolic syndrome – a group of risk factors that raises the likelihood of developing heart disease, stroke, and diabetes.

In fact, further research on cohorts of Barker children – individuals who had low birthweights – has shown that not only have they had higher rates of cardiovascular disease, but they have had higher blood sugars and higher rates of insulin resistance as well.

Today, we appreciate a fuller picture of the Barker data, one that shows a reversal of this trend when birthweights reach 4,000-4,500 grams. At this point, what was a progressively downward slope of cardiovascular mortality rates with increasing birthweight suddenly shoots upward again when birthweight exceeds 4,000 g.

It is this end of the curve that is most relevant – and most concerning – for ob.gyns. today. Our problem in the United States is not so much one of starving or growth-restricted newborns, as these babies account for 5% or less of all births. It is one of overweight and obese newborns who now represent as many as 1 in 7 births. Just like the Barker babies who were growth restricted, these newborns have high insulin levels and increased risk of cardiovascular disease as adults.

 

 

Changing the trajectory

Both maternal obesity and gestational diabetes get at the heart of the Barker Hypothesis, albeit a twist, in that excessive maternal adiposity and associated insulin resistance results in high maternal blood glucose, transferring excessive nutrients to the fetus. This causes accumulation of fat in the fetus and programs the fetus for an increased and persistent risk of adiposity after birth, early-onset metabolic syndrome, and downstream cardiovascular disease in adulthood.

Dr. Dana Dabelea’s sibling study of almost 15 years ago demonstrated the long-term impact of the adverse intrauterine environment associated with maternal diabetes. Matched siblings who were born after their mothers had developed diabetes had almost double the rate of obesity as adolescents, compared with the siblings born before their mothers were diagnosed with diabetes. In childhood, these siblings ate at the same table and came from the same gene pools (with the same fathers), but they experienced dramatically different health outcomes (Diabetes 2000:49:2208-11).

This landmark study has been reproduced by other investigators who have compared children of mothers who had gestational diabetes and/or were overweight, with children whose mothers did not have gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or were of normal weight. Such studies have consistently shown that, faced with either or both maternal obesity and diabetes in utero, offspring were significantly more likely to become overweight children and adults with insulin resistance and other components of the metabolic syndrome.

Importantly, we have evidence from randomized trials that interventions to treat GDM can effectively reduce rates of newborn obesity. While differences in birthweight between treatment and no-treatment arms have been modest, reductions in neonatal body fat, as measured by skin-fold thickness, the ponderal index, and birthweight percentile, have been highly significant.

The offspring of mothers who were treated in these trials, the Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:2477-86), and a study by Dr. Mark B. Landon and his colleagues (N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:1339-48), had approximately half of the newborn adiposity than did offspring of mothers who were not treated. In the latter study, maternal dietary measures alone were successful in reducing neonatal adiposity in over 80% of infants.

While published follow-up data of the offspring in these cohorts have covered only 5-8 years (showing persistently less adiposity in the treated groups), the offspring in the Australian cohort are still being monitored. Based on the cohort and case-control studies summarized above, it seems fair to expect that the children of mothers who were treated for GDM will have significantly better health profiles into and through adulthood.

 

 

We know from the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study that what were formerly considered mild and inconsequential maternal blood glucose levels are instead potentially quite harmful. The study showed a clear linear relationship between maternal fasting blood glucose levels, fetal cord blood insulin concentrations (a reflection of fetal glucose levels), and newborn body fat percentage (N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358:1991-2002).

Interestingly, Dr. Patrick Catalano’s analysis of data from the HAPO study (Diabetes Care 2012;35:780-6) shows us more: Maternal obesity is almost as strong a driver of newborn obesity as is GDM. Compared with GDM (which increased the percentage of infant birthweights to greater than the 90th percentile by a factor of 2.19), maternal obesity alone increased the frequency of LGA by a factor of 1.73, and maternal obesity and GDM together increased LGA newborns by 3.62-fold.

In light of these recent findings, it is critical that we not only treat our patients who have GDM, but that we attempt to interrupt the chain of obesity that passes from mother to fetus, and from obese newborns onto their subsequent offspring.

A growing proportion of women across all race and ethnicity groups gain more than 40 pounds during pregnancy for singleton births, and many of them do not lose the weight between pregnancies. Increasingly, we have patients whose first child may not have been exposed to obesity in utero, but whose second child is exposed to overweight or obesity and higher levels of insulin resistance and glycemia.

The Institute of Medicine documented these issues in its 2009 report, "Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines." Data on maternal postpartum weights are not widely available, but data that have been collected suggest that gaining above recommended ranges is associated with excess maternal weight retention post partum, regardless of prepregnancy BMI. Women who gained above the range recommended by the IOM in 1990 had postpartum weight retention of 15-20 pounds. Among women who gained excessive amounts of weight, moreover, more than 40% retained more than 20 pounds, according to the report.

We must break the intergenerational transfer of obesity and insulin resistance by liberally treating GDM and optimizing glucose control during pregnancy. More importantly, we must emphasize to women the importance of having healthy weights at the time of conception. Recent research affirms that moderately simple interventions, such as dietary improvements and exercise can go a long way to achieving these goals. If we don’t – in keeping with the knowledge spurred on by Dr. Barker – we will be programming more newborns for life with insulin resistance, obesity, and disease.

Dr. Moore is a perinatologist who is chair of the department of reproductive medicine at the University of California, San Diego. He said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Related Articles

Although there are some glimmers of hope that U.S. birthweights may be declining, the average infant birthweight has remained significantly tilted toward obesity. Moreover, and alarming number of infants, children, and adolescents are obese.

In 2007-2008, 9.5% of infants and toddlers were at or above the 95th percentile of the weight-for-recumbent-length growth charts. Among children and adolescents aged 2-19 years, 11.9% were at or above the 97th percentile of the body-mass-index-for-age growth charts; 16.9% were at or above the 95th percentile; and 31.7% were at or above the 85th percentile of BMI for age (JAMA 2010;303:242-9).

While more recent reports of obesity in children indicate a modest decline in obesity among 2- to 5-year-olds (JAMA 2014;311:806-14), an alarming number of infants and children have excess adiposity (roughly twice what is expected). In addition, cardiovascular mortality later in life continues to rise.

The question arises, have childhood and adult obesity rates remained high because mothers are feeding their children the wrong foods or because these children were born obese? One also wonders, with respect to cardiovascular mortality in adulthood, is the in utero environment playing a role?

 

 

Old lessons, growing relevance

More than 3 decades ago, the late British physician Dr. David Barker got us thinking about how a challenging life in the womb can set us up for downstream ill health. He studied births from 1910 to 1945 and found that the cardiovascular mortality of individuals born during that time was inversely related to birthweight. Smaller babies, he found, could have cardiovascular mortality risks that were double or even quadruple the risks of larger babies.

Dr. Barker theorized that, when faced with undernutrition, the fetus adapts by sending more blood to the brain and sacrificing blood flow to less essential tissues. His theory about how growth and nutrition before birth may affect the heart became known as the "Barker Hypothesis." It was initially controversial, but it led to an explosion of research – especially since 2000 – on various downstream effects of the intrauterine environment.

Investigators have learned that it is not only cardiovascular mortality that is affected by low birthweight, but also the risk of developing diabetes and being overweight. This is because the fetus makes less essential systems insulin resistant. Insulin resistance persists in the womb and after birth as well, predisposing individuals to insulin resistance and obesity, both of which are closely linked to the risk of metabolic syndrome – a group of risk factors that raises the likelihood of developing heart disease, stroke, and diabetes.

In fact, further research on cohorts of Barker children – individuals who had low birthweights – has shown that not only have they had higher rates of cardiovascular disease, but they have had higher blood sugars and higher rates of insulin resistance as well.

Today, we appreciate a fuller picture of the Barker data, one that shows a reversal of this trend when birthweights reach 4,000-4,500 grams. At this point, what was a progressively downward slope of cardiovascular mortality rates with increasing birthweight suddenly shoots upward again when birthweight exceeds 4,000 g.

It is this end of the curve that is most relevant – and most concerning – for ob.gyns. today. Our problem in the United States is not so much one of starving or growth-restricted newborns, as these babies account for 5% or less of all births. It is one of overweight and obese newborns who now represent as many as 1 in 7 births. Just like the Barker babies who were growth restricted, these newborns have high insulin levels and increased risk of cardiovascular disease as adults.

 

 

Changing the trajectory

Both maternal obesity and gestational diabetes get at the heart of the Barker Hypothesis, albeit a twist, in that excessive maternal adiposity and associated insulin resistance results in high maternal blood glucose, transferring excessive nutrients to the fetus. This causes accumulation of fat in the fetus and programs the fetus for an increased and persistent risk of adiposity after birth, early-onset metabolic syndrome, and downstream cardiovascular disease in adulthood.

Dr. Dana Dabelea’s sibling study of almost 15 years ago demonstrated the long-term impact of the adverse intrauterine environment associated with maternal diabetes. Matched siblings who were born after their mothers had developed diabetes had almost double the rate of obesity as adolescents, compared with the siblings born before their mothers were diagnosed with diabetes. In childhood, these siblings ate at the same table and came from the same gene pools (with the same fathers), but they experienced dramatically different health outcomes (Diabetes 2000:49:2208-11).

This landmark study has been reproduced by other investigators who have compared children of mothers who had gestational diabetes and/or were overweight, with children whose mothers did not have gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or were of normal weight. Such studies have consistently shown that, faced with either or both maternal obesity and diabetes in utero, offspring were significantly more likely to become overweight children and adults with insulin resistance and other components of the metabolic syndrome.

Importantly, we have evidence from randomized trials that interventions to treat GDM can effectively reduce rates of newborn obesity. While differences in birthweight between treatment and no-treatment arms have been modest, reductions in neonatal body fat, as measured by skin-fold thickness, the ponderal index, and birthweight percentile, have been highly significant.

The offspring of mothers who were treated in these trials, the Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:2477-86), and a study by Dr. Mark B. Landon and his colleagues (N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:1339-48), had approximately half of the newborn adiposity than did offspring of mothers who were not treated. In the latter study, maternal dietary measures alone were successful in reducing neonatal adiposity in over 80% of infants.

While published follow-up data of the offspring in these cohorts have covered only 5-8 years (showing persistently less adiposity in the treated groups), the offspring in the Australian cohort are still being monitored. Based on the cohort and case-control studies summarized above, it seems fair to expect that the children of mothers who were treated for GDM will have significantly better health profiles into and through adulthood.

 

 

We know from the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study that what were formerly considered mild and inconsequential maternal blood glucose levels are instead potentially quite harmful. The study showed a clear linear relationship between maternal fasting blood glucose levels, fetal cord blood insulin concentrations (a reflection of fetal glucose levels), and newborn body fat percentage (N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358:1991-2002).

Interestingly, Dr. Patrick Catalano’s analysis of data from the HAPO study (Diabetes Care 2012;35:780-6) shows us more: Maternal obesity is almost as strong a driver of newborn obesity as is GDM. Compared with GDM (which increased the percentage of infant birthweights to greater than the 90th percentile by a factor of 2.19), maternal obesity alone increased the frequency of LGA by a factor of 1.73, and maternal obesity and GDM together increased LGA newborns by 3.62-fold.

In light of these recent findings, it is critical that we not only treat our patients who have GDM, but that we attempt to interrupt the chain of obesity that passes from mother to fetus, and from obese newborns onto their subsequent offspring.

A growing proportion of women across all race and ethnicity groups gain more than 40 pounds during pregnancy for singleton births, and many of them do not lose the weight between pregnancies. Increasingly, we have patients whose first child may not have been exposed to obesity in utero, but whose second child is exposed to overweight or obesity and higher levels of insulin resistance and glycemia.

The Institute of Medicine documented these issues in its 2009 report, "Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines." Data on maternal postpartum weights are not widely available, but data that have been collected suggest that gaining above recommended ranges is associated with excess maternal weight retention post partum, regardless of prepregnancy BMI. Women who gained above the range recommended by the IOM in 1990 had postpartum weight retention of 15-20 pounds. Among women who gained excessive amounts of weight, moreover, more than 40% retained more than 20 pounds, according to the report.

We must break the intergenerational transfer of obesity and insulin resistance by liberally treating GDM and optimizing glucose control during pregnancy. More importantly, we must emphasize to women the importance of having healthy weights at the time of conception. Recent research affirms that moderately simple interventions, such as dietary improvements and exercise can go a long way to achieving these goals. If we don’t – in keeping with the knowledge spurred on by Dr. Barker – we will be programming more newborns for life with insulin resistance, obesity, and disease.

Dr. Moore is a perinatologist who is chair of the department of reproductive medicine at the University of California, San Diego. He said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

Although there are some glimmers of hope that U.S. birthweights may be declining, the average infant birthweight has remained significantly tilted toward obesity. Moreover, and alarming number of infants, children, and adolescents are obese.

In 2007-2008, 9.5% of infants and toddlers were at or above the 95th percentile of the weight-for-recumbent-length growth charts. Among children and adolescents aged 2-19 years, 11.9% were at or above the 97th percentile of the body-mass-index-for-age growth charts; 16.9% were at or above the 95th percentile; and 31.7% were at or above the 85th percentile of BMI for age (JAMA 2010;303:242-9).

While more recent reports of obesity in children indicate a modest decline in obesity among 2- to 5-year-olds (JAMA 2014;311:806-14), an alarming number of infants and children have excess adiposity (roughly twice what is expected). In addition, cardiovascular mortality later in life continues to rise.

The question arises, have childhood and adult obesity rates remained high because mothers are feeding their children the wrong foods or because these children were born obese? One also wonders, with respect to cardiovascular mortality in adulthood, is the in utero environment playing a role?

 

 

Old lessons, growing relevance

More than 3 decades ago, the late British physician Dr. David Barker got us thinking about how a challenging life in the womb can set us up for downstream ill health. He studied births from 1910 to 1945 and found that the cardiovascular mortality of individuals born during that time was inversely related to birthweight. Smaller babies, he found, could have cardiovascular mortality risks that were double or even quadruple the risks of larger babies.

Dr. Barker theorized that, when faced with undernutrition, the fetus adapts by sending more blood to the brain and sacrificing blood flow to less essential tissues. His theory about how growth and nutrition before birth may affect the heart became known as the "Barker Hypothesis." It was initially controversial, but it led to an explosion of research – especially since 2000 – on various downstream effects of the intrauterine environment.

Investigators have learned that it is not only cardiovascular mortality that is affected by low birthweight, but also the risk of developing diabetes and being overweight. This is because the fetus makes less essential systems insulin resistant. Insulin resistance persists in the womb and after birth as well, predisposing individuals to insulin resistance and obesity, both of which are closely linked to the risk of metabolic syndrome – a group of risk factors that raises the likelihood of developing heart disease, stroke, and diabetes.

In fact, further research on cohorts of Barker children – individuals who had low birthweights – has shown that not only have they had higher rates of cardiovascular disease, but they have had higher blood sugars and higher rates of insulin resistance as well.

Today, we appreciate a fuller picture of the Barker data, one that shows a reversal of this trend when birthweights reach 4,000-4,500 grams. At this point, what was a progressively downward slope of cardiovascular mortality rates with increasing birthweight suddenly shoots upward again when birthweight exceeds 4,000 g.

It is this end of the curve that is most relevant – and most concerning – for ob.gyns. today. Our problem in the United States is not so much one of starving or growth-restricted newborns, as these babies account for 5% or less of all births. It is one of overweight and obese newborns who now represent as many as 1 in 7 births. Just like the Barker babies who were growth restricted, these newborns have high insulin levels and increased risk of cardiovascular disease as adults.

 

 

Changing the trajectory

Both maternal obesity and gestational diabetes get at the heart of the Barker Hypothesis, albeit a twist, in that excessive maternal adiposity and associated insulin resistance results in high maternal blood glucose, transferring excessive nutrients to the fetus. This causes accumulation of fat in the fetus and programs the fetus for an increased and persistent risk of adiposity after birth, early-onset metabolic syndrome, and downstream cardiovascular disease in adulthood.

Dr. Dana Dabelea’s sibling study of almost 15 years ago demonstrated the long-term impact of the adverse intrauterine environment associated with maternal diabetes. Matched siblings who were born after their mothers had developed diabetes had almost double the rate of obesity as adolescents, compared with the siblings born before their mothers were diagnosed with diabetes. In childhood, these siblings ate at the same table and came from the same gene pools (with the same fathers), but they experienced dramatically different health outcomes (Diabetes 2000:49:2208-11).

This landmark study has been reproduced by other investigators who have compared children of mothers who had gestational diabetes and/or were overweight, with children whose mothers did not have gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or were of normal weight. Such studies have consistently shown that, faced with either or both maternal obesity and diabetes in utero, offspring were significantly more likely to become overweight children and adults with insulin resistance and other components of the metabolic syndrome.

Importantly, we have evidence from randomized trials that interventions to treat GDM can effectively reduce rates of newborn obesity. While differences in birthweight between treatment and no-treatment arms have been modest, reductions in neonatal body fat, as measured by skin-fold thickness, the ponderal index, and birthweight percentile, have been highly significant.

The offspring of mothers who were treated in these trials, the Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:2477-86), and a study by Dr. Mark B. Landon and his colleagues (N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:1339-48), had approximately half of the newborn adiposity than did offspring of mothers who were not treated. In the latter study, maternal dietary measures alone were successful in reducing neonatal adiposity in over 80% of infants.

While published follow-up data of the offspring in these cohorts have covered only 5-8 years (showing persistently less adiposity in the treated groups), the offspring in the Australian cohort are still being monitored. Based on the cohort and case-control studies summarized above, it seems fair to expect that the children of mothers who were treated for GDM will have significantly better health profiles into and through adulthood.

 

 

We know from the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study that what were formerly considered mild and inconsequential maternal blood glucose levels are instead potentially quite harmful. The study showed a clear linear relationship between maternal fasting blood glucose levels, fetal cord blood insulin concentrations (a reflection of fetal glucose levels), and newborn body fat percentage (N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358:1991-2002).

Interestingly, Dr. Patrick Catalano’s analysis of data from the HAPO study (Diabetes Care 2012;35:780-6) shows us more: Maternal obesity is almost as strong a driver of newborn obesity as is GDM. Compared with GDM (which increased the percentage of infant birthweights to greater than the 90th percentile by a factor of 2.19), maternal obesity alone increased the frequency of LGA by a factor of 1.73, and maternal obesity and GDM together increased LGA newborns by 3.62-fold.

In light of these recent findings, it is critical that we not only treat our patients who have GDM, but that we attempt to interrupt the chain of obesity that passes from mother to fetus, and from obese newborns onto their subsequent offspring.

A growing proportion of women across all race and ethnicity groups gain more than 40 pounds during pregnancy for singleton births, and many of them do not lose the weight between pregnancies. Increasingly, we have patients whose first child may not have been exposed to obesity in utero, but whose second child is exposed to overweight or obesity and higher levels of insulin resistance and glycemia.

The Institute of Medicine documented these issues in its 2009 report, "Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines." Data on maternal postpartum weights are not widely available, but data that have been collected suggest that gaining above recommended ranges is associated with excess maternal weight retention post partum, regardless of prepregnancy BMI. Women who gained above the range recommended by the IOM in 1990 had postpartum weight retention of 15-20 pounds. Among women who gained excessive amounts of weight, moreover, more than 40% retained more than 20 pounds, according to the report.

We must break the intergenerational transfer of obesity and insulin resistance by liberally treating GDM and optimizing glucose control during pregnancy. More importantly, we must emphasize to women the importance of having healthy weights at the time of conception. Recent research affirms that moderately simple interventions, such as dietary improvements and exercise can go a long way to achieving these goals. If we don’t – in keeping with the knowledge spurred on by Dr. Barker – we will be programming more newborns for life with insulin resistance, obesity, and disease.

Dr. Moore is a perinatologist who is chair of the department of reproductive medicine at the University of California, San Diego. He said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Gestational diabetes and the Barker Hypothesis
Display Headline
Gestational diabetes and the Barker Hypothesis
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

The fetal origins hypothesis

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 09:49
Display Headline
The fetal origins hypothesis

On Aug. 27, 2013, the field of obstetrics and gynecology suffered a great loss: the passing of Dr. David J.P. Barker. Dr. Barker was a visionary and leader whose hypothesis about the links between a mother’s health and the long-term health of her children was controversial when he first posed it in the late 1980s. However, after subsequent decades of maternal-fetal practice and research, his idea that preventing chronic disease starts with a healthy mother and baby, is embraced by the medical and science communities today.

Dr. E. Albert Reece

I was just starting my career when Dr. Barker’s hypothesis, known then as the "fetal origins hypothesis" but subsequently referred to as the "Barker Hypothesis," was published. During my fellowship in maternal-fetal medicine at Yale University, I had the privilege of attending one of Dr. Barker’s lectures and meeting him. While my colleagues and I thought him an eloquent and impassioned speaker, Dr. Barker’s theory – that there was a relationship between a person’s birth weight and his or her lifetime risk for chronic disease – was highly contentious. He had based his hypothesis on large epidemiological studies conducted in Finland, India, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States – all of which revealed that the lower a person’s birth weight, the higher his or her risk for developing coronary heart disease. In addition, he concluded that the lower a person’s birth weight, but the faster the weight gain after age 2 years, the higher a person’s risk for hypertension, stroke, and type 2 diabetes.

At that time, we did not fully realize the significance, gravity, and enormity of Dr. Barker’s contribution to the ob.gyn. field. I could not imagine the impact that his work would have on my professional path. Dr. Barker’s early papers often concluded with a section looking to the future, and in one of them he stated that "we now need to progress beyond epidemiologic associations [between in utero conditions and health later in life] to greater understanding of the cellular and molecular processes that underlie them"(Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000;71:1344s-52s). From my work as a physician with diabetic pregnant women to my scientific research devoted to understanding how, at the molecular level, maternal diabetes affects the developing fetus, I have a great appreciation and respect for Dr. Barker’s work.

Therefore, I am very pleased that this month’s Master Class is devoted to a discussion of how the Barker Hypothesis applies today. We have invited Dr. Thomas R. Moore, a perinatologist who is chair of the department of reproductive medicine at the University of California, San Diego, to give his reflection on how Dr. Barker’s once radical ideas revolutionized our field.

Dr. Reece, who specializes in maternal-fetal medicine, is vice president for medical affairs at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, as well as the John Z. and Akiko K. Bowers Distinguished Professor and dean of the school of medicine. Dr. Reece said he had no relevant financial disclosures. He is the medical editor of the Master Class column. Contact him at [email protected].

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
Dr. David J.P. Barker, chronic disease, fetal health,
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

On Aug. 27, 2013, the field of obstetrics and gynecology suffered a great loss: the passing of Dr. David J.P. Barker. Dr. Barker was a visionary and leader whose hypothesis about the links between a mother’s health and the long-term health of her children was controversial when he first posed it in the late 1980s. However, after subsequent decades of maternal-fetal practice and research, his idea that preventing chronic disease starts with a healthy mother and baby, is embraced by the medical and science communities today.

Dr. E. Albert Reece

I was just starting my career when Dr. Barker’s hypothesis, known then as the "fetal origins hypothesis" but subsequently referred to as the "Barker Hypothesis," was published. During my fellowship in maternal-fetal medicine at Yale University, I had the privilege of attending one of Dr. Barker’s lectures and meeting him. While my colleagues and I thought him an eloquent and impassioned speaker, Dr. Barker’s theory – that there was a relationship between a person’s birth weight and his or her lifetime risk for chronic disease – was highly contentious. He had based his hypothesis on large epidemiological studies conducted in Finland, India, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States – all of which revealed that the lower a person’s birth weight, the higher his or her risk for developing coronary heart disease. In addition, he concluded that the lower a person’s birth weight, but the faster the weight gain after age 2 years, the higher a person’s risk for hypertension, stroke, and type 2 diabetes.

At that time, we did not fully realize the significance, gravity, and enormity of Dr. Barker’s contribution to the ob.gyn. field. I could not imagine the impact that his work would have on my professional path. Dr. Barker’s early papers often concluded with a section looking to the future, and in one of them he stated that "we now need to progress beyond epidemiologic associations [between in utero conditions and health later in life] to greater understanding of the cellular and molecular processes that underlie them"(Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000;71:1344s-52s). From my work as a physician with diabetic pregnant women to my scientific research devoted to understanding how, at the molecular level, maternal diabetes affects the developing fetus, I have a great appreciation and respect for Dr. Barker’s work.

Therefore, I am very pleased that this month’s Master Class is devoted to a discussion of how the Barker Hypothesis applies today. We have invited Dr. Thomas R. Moore, a perinatologist who is chair of the department of reproductive medicine at the University of California, San Diego, to give his reflection on how Dr. Barker’s once radical ideas revolutionized our field.

Dr. Reece, who specializes in maternal-fetal medicine, is vice president for medical affairs at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, as well as the John Z. and Akiko K. Bowers Distinguished Professor and dean of the school of medicine. Dr. Reece said he had no relevant financial disclosures. He is the medical editor of the Master Class column. Contact him at [email protected].

On Aug. 27, 2013, the field of obstetrics and gynecology suffered a great loss: the passing of Dr. David J.P. Barker. Dr. Barker was a visionary and leader whose hypothesis about the links between a mother’s health and the long-term health of her children was controversial when he first posed it in the late 1980s. However, after subsequent decades of maternal-fetal practice and research, his idea that preventing chronic disease starts with a healthy mother and baby, is embraced by the medical and science communities today.

Dr. E. Albert Reece

I was just starting my career when Dr. Barker’s hypothesis, known then as the "fetal origins hypothesis" but subsequently referred to as the "Barker Hypothesis," was published. During my fellowship in maternal-fetal medicine at Yale University, I had the privilege of attending one of Dr. Barker’s lectures and meeting him. While my colleagues and I thought him an eloquent and impassioned speaker, Dr. Barker’s theory – that there was a relationship between a person’s birth weight and his or her lifetime risk for chronic disease – was highly contentious. He had based his hypothesis on large epidemiological studies conducted in Finland, India, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States – all of which revealed that the lower a person’s birth weight, the higher his or her risk for developing coronary heart disease. In addition, he concluded that the lower a person’s birth weight, but the faster the weight gain after age 2 years, the higher a person’s risk for hypertension, stroke, and type 2 diabetes.

At that time, we did not fully realize the significance, gravity, and enormity of Dr. Barker’s contribution to the ob.gyn. field. I could not imagine the impact that his work would have on my professional path. Dr. Barker’s early papers often concluded with a section looking to the future, and in one of them he stated that "we now need to progress beyond epidemiologic associations [between in utero conditions and health later in life] to greater understanding of the cellular and molecular processes that underlie them"(Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000;71:1344s-52s). From my work as a physician with diabetic pregnant women to my scientific research devoted to understanding how, at the molecular level, maternal diabetes affects the developing fetus, I have a great appreciation and respect for Dr. Barker’s work.

Therefore, I am very pleased that this month’s Master Class is devoted to a discussion of how the Barker Hypothesis applies today. We have invited Dr. Thomas R. Moore, a perinatologist who is chair of the department of reproductive medicine at the University of California, San Diego, to give his reflection on how Dr. Barker’s once radical ideas revolutionized our field.

Dr. Reece, who specializes in maternal-fetal medicine, is vice president for medical affairs at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, as well as the John Z. and Akiko K. Bowers Distinguished Professor and dean of the school of medicine. Dr. Reece said he had no relevant financial disclosures. He is the medical editor of the Master Class column. Contact him at [email protected].

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
The fetal origins hypothesis
Display Headline
The fetal origins hypothesis
Legacy Keywords
Dr. David J.P. Barker, chronic disease, fetal health,
Legacy Keywords
Dr. David J.P. Barker, chronic disease, fetal health,
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Autoantibody profile may affect the number and size of RA bone erosions

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 13:54
Display Headline
Autoantibody profile may affect the number and size of RA bone erosions

Rheumatoid arthritis patients who tested positive for both rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated protein antibodies showed a greater prevalence and size of bone erosions than did patients who came up negative for both in a prospective cohort study.

High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT revealed a prevalence of around 5.35 bone erosions per patient among 112 who were positive for both rheumatoid factor (RF) and anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), compared with 2.49 in 69 who were negative for both of the autoantibodies. Another 29 patients who were ACPA positive and RH negative had 2.41 erosions, while 28 patients who were ACPA negative and RH positive had 2.00 erosions. The size of the bone erosion had a similar pattern, with the greatest volume observed in patients positive for both autoantibodies (7.66 mm3), followed by ACPA-positive patients (6.20 mm3), patients negative for both autoantibodies (3.32 mm3), and RH-positive patients (2.76 mm3).

The size of erosions was also associated with the presence and titer of rheumatoid factor in ACPA-positive but not ACPA-negative patients (Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014 Aug. 12 [doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205428]).

"These observations suggest that RF may act as an enhancer of bone loss in patients with RA, and acts as an additive to ACPAs," wrote Dr. Carolin Hecht of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (Germany) and colleagues.

The study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Bundesministerium fu¨r Bildung und Forschung, the Marie Curie project OSTEOIMMUNE, the TEAM and MASTERSWITCH projects of the European Union, and the IMI-funded project BTCure. There were no other conflicts of interest declared.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
Rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatoid factor, anticitrullinated protein, bone erosion,
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Rheumatoid arthritis patients who tested positive for both rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated protein antibodies showed a greater prevalence and size of bone erosions than did patients who came up negative for both in a prospective cohort study.

High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT revealed a prevalence of around 5.35 bone erosions per patient among 112 who were positive for both rheumatoid factor (RF) and anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), compared with 2.49 in 69 who were negative for both of the autoantibodies. Another 29 patients who were ACPA positive and RH negative had 2.41 erosions, while 28 patients who were ACPA negative and RH positive had 2.00 erosions. The size of the bone erosion had a similar pattern, with the greatest volume observed in patients positive for both autoantibodies (7.66 mm3), followed by ACPA-positive patients (6.20 mm3), patients negative for both autoantibodies (3.32 mm3), and RH-positive patients (2.76 mm3).

The size of erosions was also associated with the presence and titer of rheumatoid factor in ACPA-positive but not ACPA-negative patients (Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014 Aug. 12 [doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205428]).

"These observations suggest that RF may act as an enhancer of bone loss in patients with RA, and acts as an additive to ACPAs," wrote Dr. Carolin Hecht of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (Germany) and colleagues.

The study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Bundesministerium fu¨r Bildung und Forschung, the Marie Curie project OSTEOIMMUNE, the TEAM and MASTERSWITCH projects of the European Union, and the IMI-funded project BTCure. There were no other conflicts of interest declared.

Rheumatoid arthritis patients who tested positive for both rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated protein antibodies showed a greater prevalence and size of bone erosions than did patients who came up negative for both in a prospective cohort study.

High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT revealed a prevalence of around 5.35 bone erosions per patient among 112 who were positive for both rheumatoid factor (RF) and anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), compared with 2.49 in 69 who were negative for both of the autoantibodies. Another 29 patients who were ACPA positive and RH negative had 2.41 erosions, while 28 patients who were ACPA negative and RH positive had 2.00 erosions. The size of the bone erosion had a similar pattern, with the greatest volume observed in patients positive for both autoantibodies (7.66 mm3), followed by ACPA-positive patients (6.20 mm3), patients negative for both autoantibodies (3.32 mm3), and RH-positive patients (2.76 mm3).

The size of erosions was also associated with the presence and titer of rheumatoid factor in ACPA-positive but not ACPA-negative patients (Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014 Aug. 12 [doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205428]).

"These observations suggest that RF may act as an enhancer of bone loss in patients with RA, and acts as an additive to ACPAs," wrote Dr. Carolin Hecht of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (Germany) and colleagues.

The study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Bundesministerium fu¨r Bildung und Forschung, the Marie Curie project OSTEOIMMUNE, the TEAM and MASTERSWITCH projects of the European Union, and the IMI-funded project BTCure. There were no other conflicts of interest declared.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Autoantibody profile may affect the number and size of RA bone erosions
Display Headline
Autoantibody profile may affect the number and size of RA bone erosions
Legacy Keywords
Rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatoid factor, anticitrullinated protein, bone erosion,
Legacy Keywords
Rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatoid factor, anticitrullinated protein, bone erosion,
Sections
Article Source

FROM ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: RF may enhance the loss of bone in patients who are positive for ACPAs.

Major finding: There was a prevalence of around 5.35 bone erosions per patient among 112 who were positive for both rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated protein antibodies, compared with 2.49 in 69 who were negative for both of the autoantibodies.

Data source: A prospective cohort study in 238 patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Bundesministerium fu¨r Bildung und Forschung, the Marie Curie project OSTEOIMMUNE, the TEAM and MASTERSWITCH projects of the European Union, and the IMI-funded project BTCure.

2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 13:54
Display Headline
2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Major Recommendations

The levels of evidence supporting the recommendations (A-C) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Recommendations for the Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and Biologic Agents in Patients Who Qualify for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

This 2012 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommendations update incorporates the evidence from systematic literature review synthesis and recommendations from 2008 and rates updated and new clinical scenarios regarding the use of DMARDs and biologic agents for the treatment of RA. Terms used in the recommendations are defined in Table 2 of the original guideline document. The 2012 recommendations are listed in the 4 sections below and in the following order:

  1. Indications for and switching DMARDs and biologic agents: early RA (indications, see Figure 1 in the original guideline document) followed by established RA (indications and switching, see Figure 2 in the original guideline document), along with details of the level of evidence supporting these recommendations (see Supplementary Appendix 7, available in the online version at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2151-4658 
    )
  2. Use of biologic agents in patients with hepatitis, malignancy, or congestive heart failure (CHF) who qualify for RA management (see Table 4 in the original guideline document)
  3. Screening for tuberculosis (TB) in patients starting or currently receiving biologic agents as part of their RA therapy (see Figure 3 in the original guideline document)
  4. Vaccination in patients starting or currently receiving DMARDs or biologic agents as part of their RA therapy (see Table 5 in the original guideline document)

The recommendations in the text below and in Tables 4 and 5 in the original guideline document represent the results of the 2012 update only, whereas Figures 1–3 in the original guideline document also incorporate some of the 2008 ACR RA recommendations that did not change. Areas of uncertainty by the panel (that did not lead to recommendations) are noted in Supplementary Appendix 8 (available in the online version of this article at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2151-4658 

).

  1. Indications for Starting, Resuming, Adding, or Switching DMARDs or Biologic Agents

    The panel first describes a recommendation targeting remission or low disease activity in RA (section 1A). This is followed by recommendations for DMARD or biologic agent use in early RA (section 1B). Next, the panel provides recommendations for initiating and switching between DMARDs and biologic agents in established RA (section 1C).

    1A. Target Low Disease Activity or Remission

    The panel recommends targeting either low disease activity (see Table 3 in the original guideline document) or remission (see Table 2 in the original guideline document) in all patients with early RA (see Figure 1 in the original guideline document; level of evidence C) and established RA (see Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence C) receiving any DMARD or biologic agent.

    1B. Early RA (Disease Duration <6 Months)

    In patients with early RA, the panel recommends the use of DMARD monotherapy both for low disease activity and for moderate or high disease activity with the absence of poor prognostic features (see Figure 1 in the original guideline document; level of evidence A–C) (details are shown in Supplementary Appendix 7, available in the online version of this article at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2151-4658 

    ).

    In patients with early RA, the panel recommends the use of DMARD combination therapy (including double and triple therapy) in patients with moderate or high disease activity plus poor prognostic features (see Figure 1 in the original guideline document; level of evidence A–C).

    In patients with early RA, the panel also recommends the use of an anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic with or without methotrexate in patients who have high disease activity with poor prognostic features (see Figure 1 in the original guideline document; level of evidence A and B). Infliximab is the only exception and the recommendation is to use it in combination with methotrexate, but not as monotherapy.

    1C. Established RA (Disease Duration ≥6 Months or Meeting the 1987 ACR RA Classification Criteria)

    The remainder of panel recommendations regarding indications for DMARDs and biologic agents are for patients with established RA. The 3 subsections below define recommendations for initiating and switching therapies in established RA (see Figure 2 in the original guideline document). Where the prognosis is not mentioned, the recommendation to use/switch to a DMARD or a biologic agent applies to all patients, regardless of prognostic features.

    Initiating and Switching Among DMARDs

    If after 3 months of DMARD monotherapy (in patients without poor prognostic features), a patient deteriorates from low to moderate/high disease activity, then methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, or leflunomide should be added (see rectangle A of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence A and B).

    If after 3 months of methotrexate or methotrexate/DMARD combination, a patient still has moderate or high disease activity, then add another non-methotrexate DMARD or switch to a different non-methotrexate DMARD (see rectangle B of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence B and C).

    Switching from DMARDs to Biologic Agents

    If a patient has moderate or high disease activity after 3 months of methotrexate monotherapy or DMARD combination therapy, as an alternative to the DMARD recommendation just noted above, the panel recommends adding or switching to an anti-TNF biologic, abatacept, or rituximab (see rectangles C and D of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence A–C).

    If after 3 months of intensified DMARD combination therapy or after a second DMARD, a patient still has moderate or high disease activity, add or switch to an anti-TNF biologic (see rectangle C of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence C).

    Switching Among Biologic Agents Due to Lack of Benefit or Loss of Benefit

    If a patient still has moderate or high disease activity after 3 months of anti-TNF biologic therapy and this is due to a lack or loss of benefit, switching to another anti-TNF biologic or a non-TNF biologic is recommended (see rectangles F and G of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence B and C).

    If a patient still has moderate or high disease activity after 6 months of a non-TNF biologic and the failure is due to a lack or loss of benefit, switch to another non-TNF biologic or an anti-TNF biologic (see rectangles F and G of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence B and C). An assessment period of 6 months was chosen rather than 3 months, due to the anticipation that a longer time may be required for efficacy of a non-TNF biologic.

    Switching Among Biologic Agents Due to Harms/Adverse Events

    If a patient has high disease activity after failing an anti-TNF biologic because of a serious adverse event, switch to a non-TNF biologic (see rectangle E of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence C).

    If a patient has moderate or high disease activity after failing an anti-TNF biologic because of a nonserious adverse event, switch to another anti-TNF biologic or a non-TNF biologic (see rectangle F of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence B and C).

    If a patient has moderate or high disease activity after failing a non-TNF biologic because of an adverse event (serious or nonserious), switch to another non-TNF biologic or an anti-TNF biologic (see rectangle F of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence C).

  1. Use of Biologic Agents in RA Patients With Hepatitis, Malignancy, or Chronic Heart Failure (CHF), Qualifying for More Aggressive Treatment (level of evidence C for all recommendations)

    Hepatitis B or C

    The panel recommends that etanercept could potentially be used in RA patients with hepatitis C requiring RA treatment (see Table 4 in the original guideline document).

    The panel also recommends not using biologic agents in RA patients with untreated chronic hepatitis B (disease not treated due to contraindications to treatment or intolerable adverse events) and in RA patients with treated chronic hepatitis B with Child-Pugh class B and higher (see Table 4 in the original guideline document; for details of Child-Pugh classification, see Table 2 in the original guideline document). The panel did not make recommendations regarding the use of any biologic agent for treatment in RA patients with a history of hepatitis B and a positive hepatitis B core antibody.

    Malignancies

    For patients who have been treated for solid malignancies more than 5 years ago or who have been treated for nonmelanoma skin cancer more than 5 years ago, the panel recommends starting or resuming any biologic agent if those patients would otherwise qualify for this RA management strategy (see Table 4 in the original guideline document).

    The panel only recommends starting or resuming rituximab in RA patients with: 1) a previously treated solid malignancy within the last 5 years, 2) a previously treated nonmelanoma skin cancer within the last 5 years, 3) a previously treated melanoma skin cancer, or 4) a previously treated lymphoproliferative malignancy. Little is known about the effects of biologic therapy in patients with a history of a solid cancer within the past 5 years owing to the exclusion of such patients from participation in clinical trials and the lack of studies examining the risk of recurrent cancer in this subgroup of patients.

    CHF

    The panel recommends not using an anti-TNF biologic in RA patients with CHF that is New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV and who have an ejection fraction of 50% or less (see Table 4 in the original guideline document).

  1. TB Screening for Biologic Agents (level of evidence C for all recommendations except for initiation of biologic agents in patients being treated for latent TB infection [LTBI], where the level of evidence is B)

    The panel recommends screening to identify LTBI in all RA patients being considered for therapy with biologic agents, regardless of the presence of risk factors for LTBI (see diamond A of Figure 3 in the original guideline document). It recommends that clinicians assess the patient's medical history to identify risk factors for TB (specified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]) (see Table 2 in the original guideline document).

    The panel recommends the tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon-gamma–release assays (IGRAs) as the initial test in all RA patients starting biologic agents, regardless of risk factors for LTBI (see diamond A of Figure 3 in the original guideline document). It recommends the use of the IGRA over the TST in patients who had previously received a bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination, due to the high false-positive test rates for TST (see Figure 3 in the original guideline document).

    The panel recommends that RA patients with a positive initial or repeat TST or IGRA should have a chest radiograph and, if suggestive of active TB, a subsequent sputum examination to check for the presence of active TB (see diamonds B and C of Figure 3 in the original guideline document). RA patients with a negative screening TST or IGRA may not need further evaluation in the absence of risk factors and/or clinical suspicion for TB. Since patients with RA may have false-negative TST or IGRA results due to immunosuppression, a negative TST or IGRA should not be interpreted as excluding the possibility that a patient has LTBI. Accordingly, in immunosuppressed RA patients with risk factors for LTBI and negative initial screening tests, the panel recommends that a repeat TST or IGRA could be considered 1–3 weeks after the initial negative screening (see diamond A of Figure 3 in the original guideline document).

    If the RA patient has active or latent TB based on the test results, the panel recommends appropriate antitubercular treatment and consideration of referral to a specialist. Treatment with biologic agents can be initiated or resumed after 1 month of latent TB treatment with antitubercular medications and after completion of the treatment of active TB, as applicable (see Figure 3 in the original guideline document).

    The panel recommends annual testing in RA patients who live, travel, or work in situations where TB exposure is likely while they continue treatment with biologic agents (see diamond D of Figure 3 in the original guideline document). Patients who test positive for TST or IGRA at baseline can remain positive for these tests even after successful treatment of TB. These patients need monitoring for clinical signs and symptoms of recurrent TB, since repeating tests will not help in the diagnosis of recurrent TB.

  1. Vaccination in Patients Starting or Currently Receiving DMARDs or Biologic Agents as Part of Their RA Therapy (level of evidence C for all recommendations)

    The panel recommends that all killed (pneumococcal, influenza intramuscular, and hepatitis B), recombinant (human papillomavirus [HPV] vaccine for cervical cancer), and live attenuated (herpes zoster) vaccinations should be undertaken before starting a DMARD or a biologic agent (see Table 5 in the original guideline document).

    It also recommends that, if not previously done, vaccination with indicated pneumococcal (killed), influenza intramuscular (killed), hepatitis B (killed), and HPV vaccine (recombinant) should be undertaken in RA patients already taking a DMARD or a biologic agent (see Table 5 in the original guideline document).

    The panel recommends vaccination with herpes zoster vaccine in RA patients already taking a DMARD. All vaccines should be given based on age and risk, and physicians should refer to vaccine instructions and CDC recommendations for details about dosing and timing issues related to vaccinations.

Definitions:

Level of Evidence

  • Level of Evidence A: Data derived from multiple randomized clinical trials.
  • Level of Evidence B: Data derived from a single randomized trial, or nonrandomized studies.
  • Level of Evidence C: Only consensus opinion of experts, case studies, or standard-of-care.

Note: Level C evidence often denoted a circumstance where medical literature addressed the general topic under discussion but it did not address the specific clinical situations or scenarios reviewed by the panel.

 

 

Clinical Algorithm(s)

Clinical algorithms are provided in the original guideline document for the following:

  • 2012 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommendations update for the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as a disease duration <6 months
  • 2012 ACR recommendations update for the treatment of established RA, defined as a disease duration ≥6 months or meeting the 1987 ACR classification criteria
  • 2012 ACR recommendations update for tuberculosis (TB) screening with biologic agent use

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Major Recommendations

The levels of evidence supporting the recommendations (A-C) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Recommendations for the Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and Biologic Agents in Patients Who Qualify for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

This 2012 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommendations update incorporates the evidence from systematic literature review synthesis and recommendations from 2008 and rates updated and new clinical scenarios regarding the use of DMARDs and biologic agents for the treatment of RA. Terms used in the recommendations are defined in Table 2 of the original guideline document. The 2012 recommendations are listed in the 4 sections below and in the following order:

  1. Indications for and switching DMARDs and biologic agents: early RA (indications, see Figure 1 in the original guideline document) followed by established RA (indications and switching, see Figure 2 in the original guideline document), along with details of the level of evidence supporting these recommendations (see Supplementary Appendix 7, available in the online version at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2151-4658 
    )
  2. Use of biologic agents in patients with hepatitis, malignancy, or congestive heart failure (CHF) who qualify for RA management (see Table 4 in the original guideline document)
  3. Screening for tuberculosis (TB) in patients starting or currently receiving biologic agents as part of their RA therapy (see Figure 3 in the original guideline document)
  4. Vaccination in patients starting or currently receiving DMARDs or biologic agents as part of their RA therapy (see Table 5 in the original guideline document)

The recommendations in the text below and in Tables 4 and 5 in the original guideline document represent the results of the 2012 update only, whereas Figures 1–3 in the original guideline document also incorporate some of the 2008 ACR RA recommendations that did not change. Areas of uncertainty by the panel (that did not lead to recommendations) are noted in Supplementary Appendix 8 (available in the online version of this article at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2151-4658 

).

  1. Indications for Starting, Resuming, Adding, or Switching DMARDs or Biologic Agents

    The panel first describes a recommendation targeting remission or low disease activity in RA (section 1A). This is followed by recommendations for DMARD or biologic agent use in early RA (section 1B). Next, the panel provides recommendations for initiating and switching between DMARDs and biologic agents in established RA (section 1C).

    1A. Target Low Disease Activity or Remission

    The panel recommends targeting either low disease activity (see Table 3 in the original guideline document) or remission (see Table 2 in the original guideline document) in all patients with early RA (see Figure 1 in the original guideline document; level of evidence C) and established RA (see Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence C) receiving any DMARD or biologic agent.

    1B. Early RA (Disease Duration <6 Months)

    In patients with early RA, the panel recommends the use of DMARD monotherapy both for low disease activity and for moderate or high disease activity with the absence of poor prognostic features (see Figure 1 in the original guideline document; level of evidence A–C) (details are shown in Supplementary Appendix 7, available in the online version of this article at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2151-4658 

    ).

    In patients with early RA, the panel recommends the use of DMARD combination therapy (including double and triple therapy) in patients with moderate or high disease activity plus poor prognostic features (see Figure 1 in the original guideline document; level of evidence A–C).

    In patients with early RA, the panel also recommends the use of an anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic with or without methotrexate in patients who have high disease activity with poor prognostic features (see Figure 1 in the original guideline document; level of evidence A and B). Infliximab is the only exception and the recommendation is to use it in combination with methotrexate, but not as monotherapy.

    1C. Established RA (Disease Duration ≥6 Months or Meeting the 1987 ACR RA Classification Criteria)

    The remainder of panel recommendations regarding indications for DMARDs and biologic agents are for patients with established RA. The 3 subsections below define recommendations for initiating and switching therapies in established RA (see Figure 2 in the original guideline document). Where the prognosis is not mentioned, the recommendation to use/switch to a DMARD or a biologic agent applies to all patients, regardless of prognostic features.

    Initiating and Switching Among DMARDs

    If after 3 months of DMARD monotherapy (in patients without poor prognostic features), a patient deteriorates from low to moderate/high disease activity, then methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, or leflunomide should be added (see rectangle A of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence A and B).

    If after 3 months of methotrexate or methotrexate/DMARD combination, a patient still has moderate or high disease activity, then add another non-methotrexate DMARD or switch to a different non-methotrexate DMARD (see rectangle B of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence B and C).

    Switching from DMARDs to Biologic Agents

    If a patient has moderate or high disease activity after 3 months of methotrexate monotherapy or DMARD combination therapy, as an alternative to the DMARD recommendation just noted above, the panel recommends adding or switching to an anti-TNF biologic, abatacept, or rituximab (see rectangles C and D of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence A–C).

    If after 3 months of intensified DMARD combination therapy or after a second DMARD, a patient still has moderate or high disease activity, add or switch to an anti-TNF biologic (see rectangle C of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence C).

    Switching Among Biologic Agents Due to Lack of Benefit or Loss of Benefit

    If a patient still has moderate or high disease activity after 3 months of anti-TNF biologic therapy and this is due to a lack or loss of benefit, switching to another anti-TNF biologic or a non-TNF biologic is recommended (see rectangles F and G of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence B and C).

    If a patient still has moderate or high disease activity after 6 months of a non-TNF biologic and the failure is due to a lack or loss of benefit, switch to another non-TNF biologic or an anti-TNF biologic (see rectangles F and G of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence B and C). An assessment period of 6 months was chosen rather than 3 months, due to the anticipation that a longer time may be required for efficacy of a non-TNF biologic.

    Switching Among Biologic Agents Due to Harms/Adverse Events

    If a patient has high disease activity after failing an anti-TNF biologic because of a serious adverse event, switch to a non-TNF biologic (see rectangle E of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence C).

    If a patient has moderate or high disease activity after failing an anti-TNF biologic because of a nonserious adverse event, switch to another anti-TNF biologic or a non-TNF biologic (see rectangle F of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence B and C).

    If a patient has moderate or high disease activity after failing a non-TNF biologic because of an adverse event (serious or nonserious), switch to another non-TNF biologic or an anti-TNF biologic (see rectangle F of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence C).

  1. Use of Biologic Agents in RA Patients With Hepatitis, Malignancy, or Chronic Heart Failure (CHF), Qualifying for More Aggressive Treatment (level of evidence C for all recommendations)

    Hepatitis B or C

    The panel recommends that etanercept could potentially be used in RA patients with hepatitis C requiring RA treatment (see Table 4 in the original guideline document).

    The panel also recommends not using biologic agents in RA patients with untreated chronic hepatitis B (disease not treated due to contraindications to treatment or intolerable adverse events) and in RA patients with treated chronic hepatitis B with Child-Pugh class B and higher (see Table 4 in the original guideline document; for details of Child-Pugh classification, see Table 2 in the original guideline document). The panel did not make recommendations regarding the use of any biologic agent for treatment in RA patients with a history of hepatitis B and a positive hepatitis B core antibody.

    Malignancies

    For patients who have been treated for solid malignancies more than 5 years ago or who have been treated for nonmelanoma skin cancer more than 5 years ago, the panel recommends starting or resuming any biologic agent if those patients would otherwise qualify for this RA management strategy (see Table 4 in the original guideline document).

    The panel only recommends starting or resuming rituximab in RA patients with: 1) a previously treated solid malignancy within the last 5 years, 2) a previously treated nonmelanoma skin cancer within the last 5 years, 3) a previously treated melanoma skin cancer, or 4) a previously treated lymphoproliferative malignancy. Little is known about the effects of biologic therapy in patients with a history of a solid cancer within the past 5 years owing to the exclusion of such patients from participation in clinical trials and the lack of studies examining the risk of recurrent cancer in this subgroup of patients.

    CHF

    The panel recommends not using an anti-TNF biologic in RA patients with CHF that is New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV and who have an ejection fraction of 50% or less (see Table 4 in the original guideline document).

  1. TB Screening for Biologic Agents (level of evidence C for all recommendations except for initiation of biologic agents in patients being treated for latent TB infection [LTBI], where the level of evidence is B)

    The panel recommends screening to identify LTBI in all RA patients being considered for therapy with biologic agents, regardless of the presence of risk factors for LTBI (see diamond A of Figure 3 in the original guideline document). It recommends that clinicians assess the patient's medical history to identify risk factors for TB (specified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]) (see Table 2 in the original guideline document).

    The panel recommends the tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon-gamma–release assays (IGRAs) as the initial test in all RA patients starting biologic agents, regardless of risk factors for LTBI (see diamond A of Figure 3 in the original guideline document). It recommends the use of the IGRA over the TST in patients who had previously received a bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination, due to the high false-positive test rates for TST (see Figure 3 in the original guideline document).

    The panel recommends that RA patients with a positive initial or repeat TST or IGRA should have a chest radiograph and, if suggestive of active TB, a subsequent sputum examination to check for the presence of active TB (see diamonds B and C of Figure 3 in the original guideline document). RA patients with a negative screening TST or IGRA may not need further evaluation in the absence of risk factors and/or clinical suspicion for TB. Since patients with RA may have false-negative TST or IGRA results due to immunosuppression, a negative TST or IGRA should not be interpreted as excluding the possibility that a patient has LTBI. Accordingly, in immunosuppressed RA patients with risk factors for LTBI and negative initial screening tests, the panel recommends that a repeat TST or IGRA could be considered 1–3 weeks after the initial negative screening (see diamond A of Figure 3 in the original guideline document).

    If the RA patient has active or latent TB based on the test results, the panel recommends appropriate antitubercular treatment and consideration of referral to a specialist. Treatment with biologic agents can be initiated or resumed after 1 month of latent TB treatment with antitubercular medications and after completion of the treatment of active TB, as applicable (see Figure 3 in the original guideline document).

    The panel recommends annual testing in RA patients who live, travel, or work in situations where TB exposure is likely while they continue treatment with biologic agents (see diamond D of Figure 3 in the original guideline document). Patients who test positive for TST or IGRA at baseline can remain positive for these tests even after successful treatment of TB. These patients need monitoring for clinical signs and symptoms of recurrent TB, since repeating tests will not help in the diagnosis of recurrent TB.

  1. Vaccination in Patients Starting or Currently Receiving DMARDs or Biologic Agents as Part of Their RA Therapy (level of evidence C for all recommendations)

    The panel recommends that all killed (pneumococcal, influenza intramuscular, and hepatitis B), recombinant (human papillomavirus [HPV] vaccine for cervical cancer), and live attenuated (herpes zoster) vaccinations should be undertaken before starting a DMARD or a biologic agent (see Table 5 in the original guideline document).

    It also recommends that, if not previously done, vaccination with indicated pneumococcal (killed), influenza intramuscular (killed), hepatitis B (killed), and HPV vaccine (recombinant) should be undertaken in RA patients already taking a DMARD or a biologic agent (see Table 5 in the original guideline document).

    The panel recommends vaccination with herpes zoster vaccine in RA patients already taking a DMARD. All vaccines should be given based on age and risk, and physicians should refer to vaccine instructions and CDC recommendations for details about dosing and timing issues related to vaccinations.

Definitions:

Level of Evidence

  • Level of Evidence A: Data derived from multiple randomized clinical trials.
  • Level of Evidence B: Data derived from a single randomized trial, or nonrandomized studies.
  • Level of Evidence C: Only consensus opinion of experts, case studies, or standard-of-care.

Note: Level C evidence often denoted a circumstance where medical literature addressed the general topic under discussion but it did not address the specific clinical situations or scenarios reviewed by the panel.

 

 

Clinical Algorithm(s)

Clinical algorithms are provided in the original guideline document for the following:

  • 2012 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommendations update for the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as a disease duration <6 months
  • 2012 ACR recommendations update for the treatment of established RA, defined as a disease duration ≥6 months or meeting the 1987 ACR classification criteria
  • 2012 ACR recommendations update for tuberculosis (TB) screening with biologic agent use

Major Recommendations

The levels of evidence supporting the recommendations (A-C) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Recommendations for the Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and Biologic Agents in Patients Who Qualify for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

This 2012 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommendations update incorporates the evidence from systematic literature review synthesis and recommendations from 2008 and rates updated and new clinical scenarios regarding the use of DMARDs and biologic agents for the treatment of RA. Terms used in the recommendations are defined in Table 2 of the original guideline document. The 2012 recommendations are listed in the 4 sections below and in the following order:

  1. Indications for and switching DMARDs and biologic agents: early RA (indications, see Figure 1 in the original guideline document) followed by established RA (indications and switching, see Figure 2 in the original guideline document), along with details of the level of evidence supporting these recommendations (see Supplementary Appendix 7, available in the online version at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2151-4658 
    )
  2. Use of biologic agents in patients with hepatitis, malignancy, or congestive heart failure (CHF) who qualify for RA management (see Table 4 in the original guideline document)
  3. Screening for tuberculosis (TB) in patients starting or currently receiving biologic agents as part of their RA therapy (see Figure 3 in the original guideline document)
  4. Vaccination in patients starting or currently receiving DMARDs or biologic agents as part of their RA therapy (see Table 5 in the original guideline document)

The recommendations in the text below and in Tables 4 and 5 in the original guideline document represent the results of the 2012 update only, whereas Figures 1–3 in the original guideline document also incorporate some of the 2008 ACR RA recommendations that did not change. Areas of uncertainty by the panel (that did not lead to recommendations) are noted in Supplementary Appendix 8 (available in the online version of this article at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2151-4658 

).

  1. Indications for Starting, Resuming, Adding, or Switching DMARDs or Biologic Agents

    The panel first describes a recommendation targeting remission or low disease activity in RA (section 1A). This is followed by recommendations for DMARD or biologic agent use in early RA (section 1B). Next, the panel provides recommendations for initiating and switching between DMARDs and biologic agents in established RA (section 1C).

    1A. Target Low Disease Activity or Remission

    The panel recommends targeting either low disease activity (see Table 3 in the original guideline document) or remission (see Table 2 in the original guideline document) in all patients with early RA (see Figure 1 in the original guideline document; level of evidence C) and established RA (see Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence C) receiving any DMARD or biologic agent.

    1B. Early RA (Disease Duration <6 Months)

    In patients with early RA, the panel recommends the use of DMARD monotherapy both for low disease activity and for moderate or high disease activity with the absence of poor prognostic features (see Figure 1 in the original guideline document; level of evidence A–C) (details are shown in Supplementary Appendix 7, available in the online version of this article at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2151-4658 

    ).

    In patients with early RA, the panel recommends the use of DMARD combination therapy (including double and triple therapy) in patients with moderate or high disease activity plus poor prognostic features (see Figure 1 in the original guideline document; level of evidence A–C).

    In patients with early RA, the panel also recommends the use of an anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic with or without methotrexate in patients who have high disease activity with poor prognostic features (see Figure 1 in the original guideline document; level of evidence A and B). Infliximab is the only exception and the recommendation is to use it in combination with methotrexate, but not as monotherapy.

    1C. Established RA (Disease Duration ≥6 Months or Meeting the 1987 ACR RA Classification Criteria)

    The remainder of panel recommendations regarding indications for DMARDs and biologic agents are for patients with established RA. The 3 subsections below define recommendations for initiating and switching therapies in established RA (see Figure 2 in the original guideline document). Where the prognosis is not mentioned, the recommendation to use/switch to a DMARD or a biologic agent applies to all patients, regardless of prognostic features.

    Initiating and Switching Among DMARDs

    If after 3 months of DMARD monotherapy (in patients without poor prognostic features), a patient deteriorates from low to moderate/high disease activity, then methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, or leflunomide should be added (see rectangle A of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence A and B).

    If after 3 months of methotrexate or methotrexate/DMARD combination, a patient still has moderate or high disease activity, then add another non-methotrexate DMARD or switch to a different non-methotrexate DMARD (see rectangle B of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence B and C).

    Switching from DMARDs to Biologic Agents

    If a patient has moderate or high disease activity after 3 months of methotrexate monotherapy or DMARD combination therapy, as an alternative to the DMARD recommendation just noted above, the panel recommends adding or switching to an anti-TNF biologic, abatacept, or rituximab (see rectangles C and D of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence A–C).

    If after 3 months of intensified DMARD combination therapy or after a second DMARD, a patient still has moderate or high disease activity, add or switch to an anti-TNF biologic (see rectangle C of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence C).

    Switching Among Biologic Agents Due to Lack of Benefit or Loss of Benefit

    If a patient still has moderate or high disease activity after 3 months of anti-TNF biologic therapy and this is due to a lack or loss of benefit, switching to another anti-TNF biologic or a non-TNF biologic is recommended (see rectangles F and G of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence B and C).

    If a patient still has moderate or high disease activity after 6 months of a non-TNF biologic and the failure is due to a lack or loss of benefit, switch to another non-TNF biologic or an anti-TNF biologic (see rectangles F and G of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence B and C). An assessment period of 6 months was chosen rather than 3 months, due to the anticipation that a longer time may be required for efficacy of a non-TNF biologic.

    Switching Among Biologic Agents Due to Harms/Adverse Events

    If a patient has high disease activity after failing an anti-TNF biologic because of a serious adverse event, switch to a non-TNF biologic (see rectangle E of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence C).

    If a patient has moderate or high disease activity after failing an anti-TNF biologic because of a nonserious adverse event, switch to another anti-TNF biologic or a non-TNF biologic (see rectangle F of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence B and C).

    If a patient has moderate or high disease activity after failing a non-TNF biologic because of an adverse event (serious or nonserious), switch to another non-TNF biologic or an anti-TNF biologic (see rectangle F of Figure 2 in the original guideline document; level of evidence C).

  1. Use of Biologic Agents in RA Patients With Hepatitis, Malignancy, or Chronic Heart Failure (CHF), Qualifying for More Aggressive Treatment (level of evidence C for all recommendations)

    Hepatitis B or C

    The panel recommends that etanercept could potentially be used in RA patients with hepatitis C requiring RA treatment (see Table 4 in the original guideline document).

    The panel also recommends not using biologic agents in RA patients with untreated chronic hepatitis B (disease not treated due to contraindications to treatment or intolerable adverse events) and in RA patients with treated chronic hepatitis B with Child-Pugh class B and higher (see Table 4 in the original guideline document; for details of Child-Pugh classification, see Table 2 in the original guideline document). The panel did not make recommendations regarding the use of any biologic agent for treatment in RA patients with a history of hepatitis B and a positive hepatitis B core antibody.

    Malignancies

    For patients who have been treated for solid malignancies more than 5 years ago or who have been treated for nonmelanoma skin cancer more than 5 years ago, the panel recommends starting or resuming any biologic agent if those patients would otherwise qualify for this RA management strategy (see Table 4 in the original guideline document).

    The panel only recommends starting or resuming rituximab in RA patients with: 1) a previously treated solid malignancy within the last 5 years, 2) a previously treated nonmelanoma skin cancer within the last 5 years, 3) a previously treated melanoma skin cancer, or 4) a previously treated lymphoproliferative malignancy. Little is known about the effects of biologic therapy in patients with a history of a solid cancer within the past 5 years owing to the exclusion of such patients from participation in clinical trials and the lack of studies examining the risk of recurrent cancer in this subgroup of patients.

    CHF

    The panel recommends not using an anti-TNF biologic in RA patients with CHF that is New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV and who have an ejection fraction of 50% or less (see Table 4 in the original guideline document).

  1. TB Screening for Biologic Agents (level of evidence C for all recommendations except for initiation of biologic agents in patients being treated for latent TB infection [LTBI], where the level of evidence is B)

    The panel recommends screening to identify LTBI in all RA patients being considered for therapy with biologic agents, regardless of the presence of risk factors for LTBI (see diamond A of Figure 3 in the original guideline document). It recommends that clinicians assess the patient's medical history to identify risk factors for TB (specified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]) (see Table 2 in the original guideline document).

    The panel recommends the tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon-gamma–release assays (IGRAs) as the initial test in all RA patients starting biologic agents, regardless of risk factors for LTBI (see diamond A of Figure 3 in the original guideline document). It recommends the use of the IGRA over the TST in patients who had previously received a bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination, due to the high false-positive test rates for TST (see Figure 3 in the original guideline document).

    The panel recommends that RA patients with a positive initial or repeat TST or IGRA should have a chest radiograph and, if suggestive of active TB, a subsequent sputum examination to check for the presence of active TB (see diamonds B and C of Figure 3 in the original guideline document). RA patients with a negative screening TST or IGRA may not need further evaluation in the absence of risk factors and/or clinical suspicion for TB. Since patients with RA may have false-negative TST or IGRA results due to immunosuppression, a negative TST or IGRA should not be interpreted as excluding the possibility that a patient has LTBI. Accordingly, in immunosuppressed RA patients with risk factors for LTBI and negative initial screening tests, the panel recommends that a repeat TST or IGRA could be considered 1–3 weeks after the initial negative screening (see diamond A of Figure 3 in the original guideline document).

    If the RA patient has active or latent TB based on the test results, the panel recommends appropriate antitubercular treatment and consideration of referral to a specialist. Treatment with biologic agents can be initiated or resumed after 1 month of latent TB treatment with antitubercular medications and after completion of the treatment of active TB, as applicable (see Figure 3 in the original guideline document).

    The panel recommends annual testing in RA patients who live, travel, or work in situations where TB exposure is likely while they continue treatment with biologic agents (see diamond D of Figure 3 in the original guideline document). Patients who test positive for TST or IGRA at baseline can remain positive for these tests even after successful treatment of TB. These patients need monitoring for clinical signs and symptoms of recurrent TB, since repeating tests will not help in the diagnosis of recurrent TB.

  1. Vaccination in Patients Starting or Currently Receiving DMARDs or Biologic Agents as Part of Their RA Therapy (level of evidence C for all recommendations)

    The panel recommends that all killed (pneumococcal, influenza intramuscular, and hepatitis B), recombinant (human papillomavirus [HPV] vaccine for cervical cancer), and live attenuated (herpes zoster) vaccinations should be undertaken before starting a DMARD or a biologic agent (see Table 5 in the original guideline document).

    It also recommends that, if not previously done, vaccination with indicated pneumococcal (killed), influenza intramuscular (killed), hepatitis B (killed), and HPV vaccine (recombinant) should be undertaken in RA patients already taking a DMARD or a biologic agent (see Table 5 in the original guideline document).

    The panel recommends vaccination with herpes zoster vaccine in RA patients already taking a DMARD. All vaccines should be given based on age and risk, and physicians should refer to vaccine instructions and CDC recommendations for details about dosing and timing issues related to vaccinations.

Definitions:

Level of Evidence

  • Level of Evidence A: Data derived from multiple randomized clinical trials.
  • Level of Evidence B: Data derived from a single randomized trial, or nonrandomized studies.
  • Level of Evidence C: Only consensus opinion of experts, case studies, or standard-of-care.

Note: Level C evidence often denoted a circumstance where medical literature addressed the general topic under discussion but it did not address the specific clinical situations or scenarios reviewed by the panel.

 

 

Clinical Algorithm(s)

Clinical algorithms are provided in the original guideline document for the following:

  • 2012 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommendations update for the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as a disease duration <6 months
  • 2012 ACR recommendations update for the treatment of established RA, defined as a disease duration ≥6 months or meeting the 1987 ACR classification criteria
  • 2012 ACR recommendations update for tuberculosis (TB) screening with biologic agent use

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
Display Headline
2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

OBJECTIVE:

-To simplify the treatment algorithms for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and providers

-To provide clinicians with choices for treatments of patients with active RA, both in early and established disease phases

-To provide guidance regarding treatment choices in RA patients with comorbidities such as hepatitis, congestive heart failure (CHF), and malignancy

Guidelines are copyright © 2012 American College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved. The summary is provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.


Provider Resilience

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 03/27/2019 - 12:03
Display Headline
Provider Resilience

“Health care professionals know that they need to take care of themselves and tend to know what to do to fight stress—they just don’t take the time to do it.”  That is according to the National Center for Telehealth and Technology (T2), which brings to health care providers a mobile app designed to guide users on a daily path toward resilience. It is a reality check, like a call from a loved one, reminding the user to take a break and care for him- or herself before returning to work.

Part of self-care is avoiding compassion fatigue, which means avoiding negative feelings toward the ability to complete a job effectively or handle work-related stress. Compassion fatigue has 2 components, according to T2: burnout and secondary traumatic stress. To avoid or combat compassion fatigue, the app gives frontline providers tools to keep themselves productive and emotionally healthy as they help our nation’s service members, veterans, and their families.

DASHBOARD

The app’s home screen is a dashboard, which tracks wellbeing across 4 parameters, all based on self-assessments: vacation time, burnout scale, builders and killers checklist, and professional quality-of-life (ProQOL) measures. Each of these 4 assessments calculates the user’s resilience rating, displayed by a colored meter measuring from 0 (low) to 100 (high).

Beneath the resilience rating meter is a prominent vacation clock, running time down to the minute since the user’s last recorded vacation day. To measure burnout, the app offers a survey for 10 measures that should be updated by the user at least once a week. The question asked of users is, “How would you describe yourself as you approach your workday today?” All measures, including happy, trapped, satisfied, and preoccupied, can be rated from “Not at All” to “Very Much So.”  

Builders and Killers is a daily check-in on the user’s work-life balance. Selecting from a quick 10-item checklist across 2 pages is all it takes to update this section. Items from the list include “Did you take a short walk” and “Did you come to work sick today?” There are even 2 editable items where the user may enter his or her own “Personal Killer.”

The professional quality-of-life (ProQOL) quiz is the longest of all—30 questions—but the resilience rating relies on an update only every 30 days. This quiz measures 3 critical components of ProQOL: compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. Average scores provide the following output for each section:

1. Compassion Satisfaction: “You’ve scored in the average range of Compassion Satisfaction. … This suggests that you don’t find your work to be consistently satisfying, but that you do derive some degree of satisfaction from your daily work activities."

2. Burnout: “Your Burnout score is in the average range. … This may indicate that you are currently experiencing frustration in your work and may be feeling discouraged or ineffective. It may be worth reviewing your answers to see if you can pin down the source of these feelings and determine how you might improve your experience at work.”

3. Secondary Traumatic Stress: “If you are working with clients or patients who are describing highly traumatic experiences, be sure to focus on self-care, which includes maintaining physical, emotional, social, and spiritual supports.”

The dashboard also tracks how many days until the user needs to update each section, and daily reminders (push notifications) to do so may be modified in Settings.

TOOLS

There are 7 videos currently loaded into the app. Two informational videos (both running under 10 minutes) cover burnout and secondary traumatic stress so that users can gain a richer understanding either of what they are experiencing or what they are trying to avoid. The remaining 5 videos are shorter and  can be found in the “Remind Me Why I Do This” menu. These videos cover important patient characteristics that have been found to lead to compassion fatigue, including alcohol, anger, depression, depression support, and stigma.

Scrolling flashcards can be found in “Physical Exercise” and include an assortment of stretching exercises the user can perform at his or her work desk. And if stretching doesn’t release enough endorphins, the user can raise his or her spirit browsing the cartoons found in “I Need A Laugh.” All of the cartoons are office-related, updated daily, and archived for the user’s pleasure.

VALUE CARDS

Nearly 100 inspirational flashcards are loaded onto the app, each one defining a valuable character trait, associated quote, and affirmations. To scroll through the cards, which are listed alphabetically from “Acceptance” through “Unity,” simply swipe left or right. To flip the card over, swipe up or down on the screen.

 

 

FINAL THOUGHTS

Certain luxuries we have grown accustomed to, such as rotating a device to change display orientation, don’t perform on this app, a feature missed greatly when viewing videos and a good reason to use the app on a tablet, not a phone.

And although everyone needs the occasional short break or multiday vacation, tolerance levels differ from person to person. Hence, it is important to use the app over a period of time so that the user can learn what his or her “normal” is and track readings not necessarily against the general population, but against him- or herself on the plotted ProQOL and burnout graphs.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 31(8)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
72e
Legacy Keywords
The National Center for Telehealth and Technology, T2, Provider Resilience, mobile app, productivity, emotional health, compassion fatigue, burnout, secondary traumatic stress, vacation, stress, professional quality-of-life, ProQOL
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Related Articles

“Health care professionals know that they need to take care of themselves and tend to know what to do to fight stress—they just don’t take the time to do it.”  That is according to the National Center for Telehealth and Technology (T2), which brings to health care providers a mobile app designed to guide users on a daily path toward resilience. It is a reality check, like a call from a loved one, reminding the user to take a break and care for him- or herself before returning to work.

Part of self-care is avoiding compassion fatigue, which means avoiding negative feelings toward the ability to complete a job effectively or handle work-related stress. Compassion fatigue has 2 components, according to T2: burnout and secondary traumatic stress. To avoid or combat compassion fatigue, the app gives frontline providers tools to keep themselves productive and emotionally healthy as they help our nation’s service members, veterans, and their families.

DASHBOARD

The app’s home screen is a dashboard, which tracks wellbeing across 4 parameters, all based on self-assessments: vacation time, burnout scale, builders and killers checklist, and professional quality-of-life (ProQOL) measures. Each of these 4 assessments calculates the user’s resilience rating, displayed by a colored meter measuring from 0 (low) to 100 (high).

Beneath the resilience rating meter is a prominent vacation clock, running time down to the minute since the user’s last recorded vacation day. To measure burnout, the app offers a survey for 10 measures that should be updated by the user at least once a week. The question asked of users is, “How would you describe yourself as you approach your workday today?” All measures, including happy, trapped, satisfied, and preoccupied, can be rated from “Not at All” to “Very Much So.”  

Builders and Killers is a daily check-in on the user’s work-life balance. Selecting from a quick 10-item checklist across 2 pages is all it takes to update this section. Items from the list include “Did you take a short walk” and “Did you come to work sick today?” There are even 2 editable items where the user may enter his or her own “Personal Killer.”

The professional quality-of-life (ProQOL) quiz is the longest of all—30 questions—but the resilience rating relies on an update only every 30 days. This quiz measures 3 critical components of ProQOL: compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. Average scores provide the following output for each section:

1. Compassion Satisfaction: “You’ve scored in the average range of Compassion Satisfaction. … This suggests that you don’t find your work to be consistently satisfying, but that you do derive some degree of satisfaction from your daily work activities."

2. Burnout: “Your Burnout score is in the average range. … This may indicate that you are currently experiencing frustration in your work and may be feeling discouraged or ineffective. It may be worth reviewing your answers to see if you can pin down the source of these feelings and determine how you might improve your experience at work.”

3. Secondary Traumatic Stress: “If you are working with clients or patients who are describing highly traumatic experiences, be sure to focus on self-care, which includes maintaining physical, emotional, social, and spiritual supports.”

The dashboard also tracks how many days until the user needs to update each section, and daily reminders (push notifications) to do so may be modified in Settings.

TOOLS

There are 7 videos currently loaded into the app. Two informational videos (both running under 10 minutes) cover burnout and secondary traumatic stress so that users can gain a richer understanding either of what they are experiencing or what they are trying to avoid. The remaining 5 videos are shorter and  can be found in the “Remind Me Why I Do This” menu. These videos cover important patient characteristics that have been found to lead to compassion fatigue, including alcohol, anger, depression, depression support, and stigma.

Scrolling flashcards can be found in “Physical Exercise” and include an assortment of stretching exercises the user can perform at his or her work desk. And if stretching doesn’t release enough endorphins, the user can raise his or her spirit browsing the cartoons found in “I Need A Laugh.” All of the cartoons are office-related, updated daily, and archived for the user’s pleasure.

VALUE CARDS

Nearly 100 inspirational flashcards are loaded onto the app, each one defining a valuable character trait, associated quote, and affirmations. To scroll through the cards, which are listed alphabetically from “Acceptance” through “Unity,” simply swipe left or right. To flip the card over, swipe up or down on the screen.

 

 

FINAL THOUGHTS

Certain luxuries we have grown accustomed to, such as rotating a device to change display orientation, don’t perform on this app, a feature missed greatly when viewing videos and a good reason to use the app on a tablet, not a phone.

And although everyone needs the occasional short break or multiday vacation, tolerance levels differ from person to person. Hence, it is important to use the app over a period of time so that the user can learn what his or her “normal” is and track readings not necessarily against the general population, but against him- or herself on the plotted ProQOL and burnout graphs.

“Health care professionals know that they need to take care of themselves and tend to know what to do to fight stress—they just don’t take the time to do it.”  That is according to the National Center for Telehealth and Technology (T2), which brings to health care providers a mobile app designed to guide users on a daily path toward resilience. It is a reality check, like a call from a loved one, reminding the user to take a break and care for him- or herself before returning to work.

Part of self-care is avoiding compassion fatigue, which means avoiding negative feelings toward the ability to complete a job effectively or handle work-related stress. Compassion fatigue has 2 components, according to T2: burnout and secondary traumatic stress. To avoid or combat compassion fatigue, the app gives frontline providers tools to keep themselves productive and emotionally healthy as they help our nation’s service members, veterans, and their families.

DASHBOARD

The app’s home screen is a dashboard, which tracks wellbeing across 4 parameters, all based on self-assessments: vacation time, burnout scale, builders and killers checklist, and professional quality-of-life (ProQOL) measures. Each of these 4 assessments calculates the user’s resilience rating, displayed by a colored meter measuring from 0 (low) to 100 (high).

Beneath the resilience rating meter is a prominent vacation clock, running time down to the minute since the user’s last recorded vacation day. To measure burnout, the app offers a survey for 10 measures that should be updated by the user at least once a week. The question asked of users is, “How would you describe yourself as you approach your workday today?” All measures, including happy, trapped, satisfied, and preoccupied, can be rated from “Not at All” to “Very Much So.”  

Builders and Killers is a daily check-in on the user’s work-life balance. Selecting from a quick 10-item checklist across 2 pages is all it takes to update this section. Items from the list include “Did you take a short walk” and “Did you come to work sick today?” There are even 2 editable items where the user may enter his or her own “Personal Killer.”

The professional quality-of-life (ProQOL) quiz is the longest of all—30 questions—but the resilience rating relies on an update only every 30 days. This quiz measures 3 critical components of ProQOL: compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. Average scores provide the following output for each section:

1. Compassion Satisfaction: “You’ve scored in the average range of Compassion Satisfaction. … This suggests that you don’t find your work to be consistently satisfying, but that you do derive some degree of satisfaction from your daily work activities."

2. Burnout: “Your Burnout score is in the average range. … This may indicate that you are currently experiencing frustration in your work and may be feeling discouraged or ineffective. It may be worth reviewing your answers to see if you can pin down the source of these feelings and determine how you might improve your experience at work.”

3. Secondary Traumatic Stress: “If you are working with clients or patients who are describing highly traumatic experiences, be sure to focus on self-care, which includes maintaining physical, emotional, social, and spiritual supports.”

The dashboard also tracks how many days until the user needs to update each section, and daily reminders (push notifications) to do so may be modified in Settings.

TOOLS

There are 7 videos currently loaded into the app. Two informational videos (both running under 10 minutes) cover burnout and secondary traumatic stress so that users can gain a richer understanding either of what they are experiencing or what they are trying to avoid. The remaining 5 videos are shorter and  can be found in the “Remind Me Why I Do This” menu. These videos cover important patient characteristics that have been found to lead to compassion fatigue, including alcohol, anger, depression, depression support, and stigma.

Scrolling flashcards can be found in “Physical Exercise” and include an assortment of stretching exercises the user can perform at his or her work desk. And if stretching doesn’t release enough endorphins, the user can raise his or her spirit browsing the cartoons found in “I Need A Laugh.” All of the cartoons are office-related, updated daily, and archived for the user’s pleasure.

VALUE CARDS

Nearly 100 inspirational flashcards are loaded onto the app, each one defining a valuable character trait, associated quote, and affirmations. To scroll through the cards, which are listed alphabetically from “Acceptance” through “Unity,” simply swipe left or right. To flip the card over, swipe up or down on the screen.

 

 

FINAL THOUGHTS

Certain luxuries we have grown accustomed to, such as rotating a device to change display orientation, don’t perform on this app, a feature missed greatly when viewing videos and a good reason to use the app on a tablet, not a phone.

And although everyone needs the occasional short break or multiday vacation, tolerance levels differ from person to person. Hence, it is important to use the app over a period of time so that the user can learn what his or her “normal” is and track readings not necessarily against the general population, but against him- or herself on the plotted ProQOL and burnout graphs.

References

References

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 31(8)
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 31(8)
Page Number
72e
Page Number
72e
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Provider Resilience
Display Headline
Provider Resilience
Legacy Keywords
The National Center for Telehealth and Technology, T2, Provider Resilience, mobile app, productivity, emotional health, compassion fatigue, burnout, secondary traumatic stress, vacation, stress, professional quality-of-life, ProQOL
Legacy Keywords
The National Center for Telehealth and Technology, T2, Provider Resilience, mobile app, productivity, emotional health, compassion fatigue, burnout, secondary traumatic stress, vacation, stress, professional quality-of-life, ProQOL
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Risk factors for premature menopause in HL survivors

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 08/25/2014 - 06:00
Display Headline
Risk factors for premature menopause in HL survivors

Doctor examines patient

Credit: NCI

The risk of premature menopause among survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) may vary greatly, according to a study of more than 2000 women.

The results suggest that ovarian radiotherapy and certain chemotherapeutic regimens increase a woman’s risk of premature menopause.

And the radiation dose, number of treatment cycles, and patient age at treatment all influence that risk.

The findings appear in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Previous research suggested that women with HL who receive certain types of chemotherapy or radiotherapy are at an increased risk of early menopause, but there was insufficient information to provide patients with detailed advice.

To gain more insight, Anthony Swerdlow, DSc, of The Institute of Cancer Research in London, UK, and his colleagues studied 2127 women who were treated for HL in England or Wales between 1960 and 2004.

All of the women were younger than 36 at the time of treatment, and all had received chest radiotherapy, sometimes alongside other treatments.

Some 605 of the women underwent non-surgical menopause before the age of 40. The researchers said this was a large enough number for them to estimate accurate risks of menopause, depending on the type and dose of treatments patients received and the age they received them.

The team found that several treatments caused a sharp increase in premature menopause risk, and menopause was more like among women treated at older ages.

The risk of premature menopause increased more than 20-fold after ovarian radiotherapy, alkylating chemotherapy other than dacarbazine, or BEAM (bis-chloroethylnitrosourea, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) chemotherapy given prior to stem cell transplant.

However, there was no significant increase in risk after receiving adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD).

Within 5 years of treatment, menopause had occurred in 62.5% of patients who received ≥5 Gy of ovarian radiotherapy, 50.9% of patients who received BEAM, and 24.2% of patients who received ≥6 cycles of alkylating chemotherapy.

The cumulative risk of menopause by age 40 was 81.3% after ≥ 5 Gy of ovarian radiotherapy, 75.3% after BEAM, 49.1% after ≥ 6 cycles of alkylating chemotherapy, 3.0% after solely supradiaphragmatic radiotherapy, and 1.4% after ABVD.

“We hope our study will help women to understand better, in consultation with their doctors, their risks of future infertility following treatment for this malignancy,” Dr Swerdlow said.

“By looking in a much larger group of women than previous studies of this type, we were able to produce age- and treatment-specific risk estimates that we hope will be of practical use to individual women.”

Publications
Topics

Doctor examines patient

Credit: NCI

The risk of premature menopause among survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) may vary greatly, according to a study of more than 2000 women.

The results suggest that ovarian radiotherapy and certain chemotherapeutic regimens increase a woman’s risk of premature menopause.

And the radiation dose, number of treatment cycles, and patient age at treatment all influence that risk.

The findings appear in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Previous research suggested that women with HL who receive certain types of chemotherapy or radiotherapy are at an increased risk of early menopause, but there was insufficient information to provide patients with detailed advice.

To gain more insight, Anthony Swerdlow, DSc, of The Institute of Cancer Research in London, UK, and his colleagues studied 2127 women who were treated for HL in England or Wales between 1960 and 2004.

All of the women were younger than 36 at the time of treatment, and all had received chest radiotherapy, sometimes alongside other treatments.

Some 605 of the women underwent non-surgical menopause before the age of 40. The researchers said this was a large enough number for them to estimate accurate risks of menopause, depending on the type and dose of treatments patients received and the age they received them.

The team found that several treatments caused a sharp increase in premature menopause risk, and menopause was more like among women treated at older ages.

The risk of premature menopause increased more than 20-fold after ovarian radiotherapy, alkylating chemotherapy other than dacarbazine, or BEAM (bis-chloroethylnitrosourea, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) chemotherapy given prior to stem cell transplant.

However, there was no significant increase in risk after receiving adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD).

Within 5 years of treatment, menopause had occurred in 62.5% of patients who received ≥5 Gy of ovarian radiotherapy, 50.9% of patients who received BEAM, and 24.2% of patients who received ≥6 cycles of alkylating chemotherapy.

The cumulative risk of menopause by age 40 was 81.3% after ≥ 5 Gy of ovarian radiotherapy, 75.3% after BEAM, 49.1% after ≥ 6 cycles of alkylating chemotherapy, 3.0% after solely supradiaphragmatic radiotherapy, and 1.4% after ABVD.

“We hope our study will help women to understand better, in consultation with their doctors, their risks of future infertility following treatment for this malignancy,” Dr Swerdlow said.

“By looking in a much larger group of women than previous studies of this type, we were able to produce age- and treatment-specific risk estimates that we hope will be of practical use to individual women.”

Doctor examines patient

Credit: NCI

The risk of premature menopause among survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) may vary greatly, according to a study of more than 2000 women.

The results suggest that ovarian radiotherapy and certain chemotherapeutic regimens increase a woman’s risk of premature menopause.

And the radiation dose, number of treatment cycles, and patient age at treatment all influence that risk.

The findings appear in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Previous research suggested that women with HL who receive certain types of chemotherapy or radiotherapy are at an increased risk of early menopause, but there was insufficient information to provide patients with detailed advice.

To gain more insight, Anthony Swerdlow, DSc, of The Institute of Cancer Research in London, UK, and his colleagues studied 2127 women who were treated for HL in England or Wales between 1960 and 2004.

All of the women were younger than 36 at the time of treatment, and all had received chest radiotherapy, sometimes alongside other treatments.

Some 605 of the women underwent non-surgical menopause before the age of 40. The researchers said this was a large enough number for them to estimate accurate risks of menopause, depending on the type and dose of treatments patients received and the age they received them.

The team found that several treatments caused a sharp increase in premature menopause risk, and menopause was more like among women treated at older ages.

The risk of premature menopause increased more than 20-fold after ovarian radiotherapy, alkylating chemotherapy other than dacarbazine, or BEAM (bis-chloroethylnitrosourea, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) chemotherapy given prior to stem cell transplant.

However, there was no significant increase in risk after receiving adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD).

Within 5 years of treatment, menopause had occurred in 62.5% of patients who received ≥5 Gy of ovarian radiotherapy, 50.9% of patients who received BEAM, and 24.2% of patients who received ≥6 cycles of alkylating chemotherapy.

The cumulative risk of menopause by age 40 was 81.3% after ≥ 5 Gy of ovarian radiotherapy, 75.3% after BEAM, 49.1% after ≥ 6 cycles of alkylating chemotherapy, 3.0% after solely supradiaphragmatic radiotherapy, and 1.4% after ABVD.

“We hope our study will help women to understand better, in consultation with their doctors, their risks of future infertility following treatment for this malignancy,” Dr Swerdlow said.

“By looking in a much larger group of women than previous studies of this type, we were able to produce age- and treatment-specific risk estimates that we hope will be of practical use to individual women.”

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Risk factors for premature menopause in HL survivors
Display Headline
Risk factors for premature menopause in HL survivors
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

A new system for malaria diagnosis

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 08/25/2014 - 05:00
Display Headline
A new system for malaria diagnosis

Blood smear showing

Plasmodium falciparum

Credit: CDC/Mae Melvin

A semi-automated system may allow healthcare professionals to diagnose malaria infection with more than 90% accuracy.

With this system, a computer algorithm analyzes red blood cells from a digitized slide, ranks them according to the likelihood of infection, and presents the user with more than 100 images from which to make a diagnosis.

Johan Lundin, MD, PhD, of the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, and his colleagues described the system in PLOS ONE.

The researchers noted that high-quality microscopy is still the most accurate method for detecting malaria infection. However, as microscopy can be time-consuming, the team wanted to streamline the process by developing a semi-automated system.

“We are not suggesting that the whole malaria diagnostic process could or should be automated,” Dr Lundin said. “Rather, our aim is to develop methods that are significantly less labor-intensive than the traditional ones and have a potential to considerably increase the throughput in malaria diagnostics.”

The group’s method is based on computer vision algorithms similar to those used in facial recognition software. First, a thin layer of blood smeared on a microscope slide is digitized. Then, a computer algorithm analyzes more than 50,000 red blood cells per sample and ranks them according to the probability of malaria infection.

Next, the program creates a panel containing images of more than a hundred cells that are the most likely to be infected and presents that panel to the user. The final diagnosis is made by a healthcare professional based on the images.

To test this system, Dr Lundin and his colleagues used a set of samples from 19 patients already diagnosed with malaria and 12 control subjects. From each sample, the researchers created a digitized slide, and the system generated 128 images of the most probable parasite candidate regions.

Two expert microscopists viewed the images on a tablet computer to determine whether a subject was infected with Plasmodium falciparum.

The diagnostic sensitivity was 90% with one viewer and 95% for the other. The specificity was 100% for both viewers.

Based on these results, the researchers said this system has the potential to increase the throughput in malaria diagnostics. However, it does require some tweaking, and the team would like to expand its capabilities.

“The equipment needed for digitization of the samples is a challenge in developed countries,” said study author Nina Linder, MD, PhD, also of the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland. “In the next phase of our project, we will test the system in combination with inexpensive mobile microscopy devices that our group has also developed.”

“There is also a strong need for fast and accurate methods for measuring the malaria parasite load in a sample,” she added. “Various malaria drug screening programs are underway, and the parasite load in a large number of samples needs to be quantified for determining the efficacy of potential drugs. We are further developing the computer algorithms used in this study to meet this need as well.”

Lastly, the researchers said this system could be applied in various other fields of medicine. In addition to other infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, the group is planning to test the system’s utility in cancer diagnosis.

Publications
Topics

Blood smear showing

Plasmodium falciparum

Credit: CDC/Mae Melvin

A semi-automated system may allow healthcare professionals to diagnose malaria infection with more than 90% accuracy.

With this system, a computer algorithm analyzes red blood cells from a digitized slide, ranks them according to the likelihood of infection, and presents the user with more than 100 images from which to make a diagnosis.

Johan Lundin, MD, PhD, of the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, and his colleagues described the system in PLOS ONE.

The researchers noted that high-quality microscopy is still the most accurate method for detecting malaria infection. However, as microscopy can be time-consuming, the team wanted to streamline the process by developing a semi-automated system.

“We are not suggesting that the whole malaria diagnostic process could or should be automated,” Dr Lundin said. “Rather, our aim is to develop methods that are significantly less labor-intensive than the traditional ones and have a potential to considerably increase the throughput in malaria diagnostics.”

The group’s method is based on computer vision algorithms similar to those used in facial recognition software. First, a thin layer of blood smeared on a microscope slide is digitized. Then, a computer algorithm analyzes more than 50,000 red blood cells per sample and ranks them according to the probability of malaria infection.

Next, the program creates a panel containing images of more than a hundred cells that are the most likely to be infected and presents that panel to the user. The final diagnosis is made by a healthcare professional based on the images.

To test this system, Dr Lundin and his colleagues used a set of samples from 19 patients already diagnosed with malaria and 12 control subjects. From each sample, the researchers created a digitized slide, and the system generated 128 images of the most probable parasite candidate regions.

Two expert microscopists viewed the images on a tablet computer to determine whether a subject was infected with Plasmodium falciparum.

The diagnostic sensitivity was 90% with one viewer and 95% for the other. The specificity was 100% for both viewers.

Based on these results, the researchers said this system has the potential to increase the throughput in malaria diagnostics. However, it does require some tweaking, and the team would like to expand its capabilities.

“The equipment needed for digitization of the samples is a challenge in developed countries,” said study author Nina Linder, MD, PhD, also of the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland. “In the next phase of our project, we will test the system in combination with inexpensive mobile microscopy devices that our group has also developed.”

“There is also a strong need for fast and accurate methods for measuring the malaria parasite load in a sample,” she added. “Various malaria drug screening programs are underway, and the parasite load in a large number of samples needs to be quantified for determining the efficacy of potential drugs. We are further developing the computer algorithms used in this study to meet this need as well.”

Lastly, the researchers said this system could be applied in various other fields of medicine. In addition to other infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, the group is planning to test the system’s utility in cancer diagnosis.

Blood smear showing

Plasmodium falciparum

Credit: CDC/Mae Melvin

A semi-automated system may allow healthcare professionals to diagnose malaria infection with more than 90% accuracy.

With this system, a computer algorithm analyzes red blood cells from a digitized slide, ranks them according to the likelihood of infection, and presents the user with more than 100 images from which to make a diagnosis.

Johan Lundin, MD, PhD, of the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, and his colleagues described the system in PLOS ONE.

The researchers noted that high-quality microscopy is still the most accurate method for detecting malaria infection. However, as microscopy can be time-consuming, the team wanted to streamline the process by developing a semi-automated system.

“We are not suggesting that the whole malaria diagnostic process could or should be automated,” Dr Lundin said. “Rather, our aim is to develop methods that are significantly less labor-intensive than the traditional ones and have a potential to considerably increase the throughput in malaria diagnostics.”

The group’s method is based on computer vision algorithms similar to those used in facial recognition software. First, a thin layer of blood smeared on a microscope slide is digitized. Then, a computer algorithm analyzes more than 50,000 red blood cells per sample and ranks them according to the probability of malaria infection.

Next, the program creates a panel containing images of more than a hundred cells that are the most likely to be infected and presents that panel to the user. The final diagnosis is made by a healthcare professional based on the images.

To test this system, Dr Lundin and his colleagues used a set of samples from 19 patients already diagnosed with malaria and 12 control subjects. From each sample, the researchers created a digitized slide, and the system generated 128 images of the most probable parasite candidate regions.

Two expert microscopists viewed the images on a tablet computer to determine whether a subject was infected with Plasmodium falciparum.

The diagnostic sensitivity was 90% with one viewer and 95% for the other. The specificity was 100% for both viewers.

Based on these results, the researchers said this system has the potential to increase the throughput in malaria diagnostics. However, it does require some tweaking, and the team would like to expand its capabilities.

“The equipment needed for digitization of the samples is a challenge in developed countries,” said study author Nina Linder, MD, PhD, also of the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland. “In the next phase of our project, we will test the system in combination with inexpensive mobile microscopy devices that our group has also developed.”

“There is also a strong need for fast and accurate methods for measuring the malaria parasite load in a sample,” she added. “Various malaria drug screening programs are underway, and the parasite load in a large number of samples needs to be quantified for determining the efficacy of potential drugs. We are further developing the computer algorithms used in this study to meet this need as well.”

Lastly, the researchers said this system could be applied in various other fields of medicine. In addition to other infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, the group is planning to test the system’s utility in cancer diagnosis.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
A new system for malaria diagnosis
Display Headline
A new system for malaria diagnosis
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Product prevents bleeding in hemophilia A, company says

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 08/24/2014 - 05:00
Display Headline
Product prevents bleeding in hemophilia A, company says

Antihemophilic factor

A recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) product known as BAX 855 can prevent bleeding in hemophilia A patients, according to Baxter International, the company developing the product.

BAX 855 is a pegylated version of ADVATE, a full-length rFVIII product already approved to treat hemophilia A.

In a phase 3 study, BAX 855 met the primary endpoint of reducing annualized bleed rates (ABRs) among hemophilia A patients when used as prophylaxis rather than on-demand treatment.

The trial included 138 patients age 12 and older with previously treated hemophilia A. The patients received BAX 855 either twice weekly (45 IU/kg) or on-demand and were followed for 6 months.

The primary objective was to show that BAX 855 prophylaxis can reduce ABRs compared to on-demand treatment. The researchers’ other objectives were to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the compound when administered as prophylaxis or on-demand.

BAX 855 met its primary endpoint in the control and prevention of bleeding, routine prophylaxis, and perioperative management.

Patients in the twice-weekly prophylaxis arm experienced a 95% reduction in median ABR compared to those in the on-demand arm (1.9% vs 41.5%, respectively). BAX 855 was also effective in treating bleeding episodes, 96% of which were controlled with 1 or 2 infusions.

The half-life of BAX 855 was 1.4 to 1.5 times that of ADVATE, which is consistent with the findings from a phase 1 study.

No patients developed inhibitors to BAX 855 and no treatment-related serious adverse events, including hypersensitivity, were reported. The most common treatment-related adverse event was headache, which occurred in 3 patients.

Baxter said it expects to submit a biologics license application for BAX 855 to the US Food and Drug Administration before the end of 2014 and to present additional trial data in the coming months.

In addition to an ongoing continuation study for patients who have completed the pivotal trial, the company is starting a phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BAX 855 among 60 previously treated hemophilia A patients younger than 12 years of age.

Consistent with guidelines published by the European Medicines Agency that require a study in children less than 12 years of age prior to filing, Baxter expects to file a marketing authorization application with the agency upon the completing the pediatric study.

Publications
Topics

Antihemophilic factor

A recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) product known as BAX 855 can prevent bleeding in hemophilia A patients, according to Baxter International, the company developing the product.

BAX 855 is a pegylated version of ADVATE, a full-length rFVIII product already approved to treat hemophilia A.

In a phase 3 study, BAX 855 met the primary endpoint of reducing annualized bleed rates (ABRs) among hemophilia A patients when used as prophylaxis rather than on-demand treatment.

The trial included 138 patients age 12 and older with previously treated hemophilia A. The patients received BAX 855 either twice weekly (45 IU/kg) or on-demand and were followed for 6 months.

The primary objective was to show that BAX 855 prophylaxis can reduce ABRs compared to on-demand treatment. The researchers’ other objectives were to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the compound when administered as prophylaxis or on-demand.

BAX 855 met its primary endpoint in the control and prevention of bleeding, routine prophylaxis, and perioperative management.

Patients in the twice-weekly prophylaxis arm experienced a 95% reduction in median ABR compared to those in the on-demand arm (1.9% vs 41.5%, respectively). BAX 855 was also effective in treating bleeding episodes, 96% of which were controlled with 1 or 2 infusions.

The half-life of BAX 855 was 1.4 to 1.5 times that of ADVATE, which is consistent with the findings from a phase 1 study.

No patients developed inhibitors to BAX 855 and no treatment-related serious adverse events, including hypersensitivity, were reported. The most common treatment-related adverse event was headache, which occurred in 3 patients.

Baxter said it expects to submit a biologics license application for BAX 855 to the US Food and Drug Administration before the end of 2014 and to present additional trial data in the coming months.

In addition to an ongoing continuation study for patients who have completed the pivotal trial, the company is starting a phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BAX 855 among 60 previously treated hemophilia A patients younger than 12 years of age.

Consistent with guidelines published by the European Medicines Agency that require a study in children less than 12 years of age prior to filing, Baxter expects to file a marketing authorization application with the agency upon the completing the pediatric study.

Antihemophilic factor

A recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) product known as BAX 855 can prevent bleeding in hemophilia A patients, according to Baxter International, the company developing the product.

BAX 855 is a pegylated version of ADVATE, a full-length rFVIII product already approved to treat hemophilia A.

In a phase 3 study, BAX 855 met the primary endpoint of reducing annualized bleed rates (ABRs) among hemophilia A patients when used as prophylaxis rather than on-demand treatment.

The trial included 138 patients age 12 and older with previously treated hemophilia A. The patients received BAX 855 either twice weekly (45 IU/kg) or on-demand and were followed for 6 months.

The primary objective was to show that BAX 855 prophylaxis can reduce ABRs compared to on-demand treatment. The researchers’ other objectives were to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the compound when administered as prophylaxis or on-demand.

BAX 855 met its primary endpoint in the control and prevention of bleeding, routine prophylaxis, and perioperative management.

Patients in the twice-weekly prophylaxis arm experienced a 95% reduction in median ABR compared to those in the on-demand arm (1.9% vs 41.5%, respectively). BAX 855 was also effective in treating bleeding episodes, 96% of which were controlled with 1 or 2 infusions.

The half-life of BAX 855 was 1.4 to 1.5 times that of ADVATE, which is consistent with the findings from a phase 1 study.

No patients developed inhibitors to BAX 855 and no treatment-related serious adverse events, including hypersensitivity, were reported. The most common treatment-related adverse event was headache, which occurred in 3 patients.

Baxter said it expects to submit a biologics license application for BAX 855 to the US Food and Drug Administration before the end of 2014 and to present additional trial data in the coming months.

In addition to an ongoing continuation study for patients who have completed the pivotal trial, the company is starting a phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BAX 855 among 60 previously treated hemophilia A patients younger than 12 years of age.

Consistent with guidelines published by the European Medicines Agency that require a study in children less than 12 years of age prior to filing, Baxter expects to file a marketing authorization application with the agency upon the completing the pediatric study.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Product prevents bleeding in hemophilia A, company says
Display Headline
Product prevents bleeding in hemophilia A, company says
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

New technology enables malaria discovery

Article Type
Changed
Sat, 08/23/2014 - 05:00
Display Headline
New technology enables malaria discovery

Plasmodium sporozoite

Credit: Ute Frevert

and Margaret Shear

Researchers say they’ve developed a new computational method to predict the function of disease-causing genes and proteins, and this has enabled an important discovery.

The team used the method to study EXP1, a protein known to be essential to the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum, although its exact mechanism has been unclear.

The research revealed that EXP1 enables the parasite to detoxify the main metabolic byproducts it creates in red blood cells.

The researchers also found that EXP1 has a direct role in drug action and susceptibility to artesunate, an important member of the artemisinin drug family.

“Through this multiyear collaborative effort, we now have an improved understanding of the protective molecular mechanisms of the malaria parasite and its drug susceptibility to artesunate,” said study author Olivier Lichtarge, MD, PhD, of the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas.

“As we are witnessing a rise of resistance to artemisinins, these results may help [us in] finding new pathways to successor drugs.”

Dr Lichtarge and his colleagues described this research in Cell.

The team devised a computational method that allows biological information to flow from gene to gene across the supergenomic network.

“The network connects millions of genes from hundreds of species based on their interactions within the organism or based on their ancestral relations between different species,” said study author Andreas Martin Lisewski, PhD, also of the Baylor College of Medicine.

“Normally, computing the flow of functional information would be costly and slow, but we developed a compression method that reduces this gigantic network into one that is much smaller and now computationally tractable. The surprise is that these biological networks are compressible, much like digital data in today’s computers.”

To test their method, the researchers looked at functional predictions of P falciparum. It’s been more than 10 years since this parasite’s genome was fully sequenced, but little is known about the function for most of its genes.

“To better understand this disease, we need to identify more functions of the parasite’s genes,” Dr Lisewski said. “This understanding may eventually help us to stem the rise of drug-resistant malaria, such as the emerging resistance to artemisinins.”

With that in mind, the researchers used their computational method to study EXP1. And they discovered the protein is a membrane glutathione S-transferase that degrades cytotoxic hematin but is inhibited by artesunate.

Publications
Topics

Plasmodium sporozoite

Credit: Ute Frevert

and Margaret Shear

Researchers say they’ve developed a new computational method to predict the function of disease-causing genes and proteins, and this has enabled an important discovery.

The team used the method to study EXP1, a protein known to be essential to the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum, although its exact mechanism has been unclear.

The research revealed that EXP1 enables the parasite to detoxify the main metabolic byproducts it creates in red blood cells.

The researchers also found that EXP1 has a direct role in drug action and susceptibility to artesunate, an important member of the artemisinin drug family.

“Through this multiyear collaborative effort, we now have an improved understanding of the protective molecular mechanisms of the malaria parasite and its drug susceptibility to artesunate,” said study author Olivier Lichtarge, MD, PhD, of the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas.

“As we are witnessing a rise of resistance to artemisinins, these results may help [us in] finding new pathways to successor drugs.”

Dr Lichtarge and his colleagues described this research in Cell.

The team devised a computational method that allows biological information to flow from gene to gene across the supergenomic network.

“The network connects millions of genes from hundreds of species based on their interactions within the organism or based on their ancestral relations between different species,” said study author Andreas Martin Lisewski, PhD, also of the Baylor College of Medicine.

“Normally, computing the flow of functional information would be costly and slow, but we developed a compression method that reduces this gigantic network into one that is much smaller and now computationally tractable. The surprise is that these biological networks are compressible, much like digital data in today’s computers.”

To test their method, the researchers looked at functional predictions of P falciparum. It’s been more than 10 years since this parasite’s genome was fully sequenced, but little is known about the function for most of its genes.

“To better understand this disease, we need to identify more functions of the parasite’s genes,” Dr Lisewski said. “This understanding may eventually help us to stem the rise of drug-resistant malaria, such as the emerging resistance to artemisinins.”

With that in mind, the researchers used their computational method to study EXP1. And they discovered the protein is a membrane glutathione S-transferase that degrades cytotoxic hematin but is inhibited by artesunate.

Plasmodium sporozoite

Credit: Ute Frevert

and Margaret Shear

Researchers say they’ve developed a new computational method to predict the function of disease-causing genes and proteins, and this has enabled an important discovery.

The team used the method to study EXP1, a protein known to be essential to the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum, although its exact mechanism has been unclear.

The research revealed that EXP1 enables the parasite to detoxify the main metabolic byproducts it creates in red blood cells.

The researchers also found that EXP1 has a direct role in drug action and susceptibility to artesunate, an important member of the artemisinin drug family.

“Through this multiyear collaborative effort, we now have an improved understanding of the protective molecular mechanisms of the malaria parasite and its drug susceptibility to artesunate,” said study author Olivier Lichtarge, MD, PhD, of the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas.

“As we are witnessing a rise of resistance to artemisinins, these results may help [us in] finding new pathways to successor drugs.”

Dr Lichtarge and his colleagues described this research in Cell.

The team devised a computational method that allows biological information to flow from gene to gene across the supergenomic network.

“The network connects millions of genes from hundreds of species based on their interactions within the organism or based on their ancestral relations between different species,” said study author Andreas Martin Lisewski, PhD, also of the Baylor College of Medicine.

“Normally, computing the flow of functional information would be costly and slow, but we developed a compression method that reduces this gigantic network into one that is much smaller and now computationally tractable. The surprise is that these biological networks are compressible, much like digital data in today’s computers.”

To test their method, the researchers looked at functional predictions of P falciparum. It’s been more than 10 years since this parasite’s genome was fully sequenced, but little is known about the function for most of its genes.

“To better understand this disease, we need to identify more functions of the parasite’s genes,” Dr Lisewski said. “This understanding may eventually help us to stem the rise of drug-resistant malaria, such as the emerging resistance to artemisinins.”

With that in mind, the researchers used their computational method to study EXP1. And they discovered the protein is a membrane glutathione S-transferase that degrades cytotoxic hematin but is inhibited by artesunate.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
New technology enables malaria discovery
Display Headline
New technology enables malaria discovery
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica