Case Letter

To the Editor:

A 53-year-old woman was referred by her oncologist to our dermatology office with lesions on the face and body that presented 8 days after starting vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily for metastatic melanoma. The patient denied any symptoms from the lesions but was concerned they would spread to cover her entire face and body.

The patient's medical history included a diagnosis of metastatic melanoma 6 years prior to presentation. She stated that the primary cutaneous melanoma site was unknown. The patient had endured numerous surgeries to excise lymph node tumors, with some lesions up to 3 cm. The patient recently started vemurafenib, a treatment for BRAF V600E mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. The patient's personal history was notable for hepatitis A, B, and C, and her family history revealed her mother had metastatic lung cancer.

Physical examination revealed numerous 2- to 3-mm, round-oval, flesh-colored to light-brown papules on the cheeks, chest, abdomen (Figure 1), back, and both arms and legs. Some papules were inflamed and some had a stuck-on appearance. Lesions on the chest between the breasts and inframammary region were slightly inflamed. Two skin biopsies were performed. Biopsy of the lesion on the right lateral back revealed solar lentigo, early macular seborrheic keratosis, and a focus of inflamed mild solar keratosis. The dermis showed a mild superficial perivascular and interstitial inflammatory infiltrate composed mostly of lymphocytes, histiocytes, and eosinophils. There were occasional melanophages present (Figure 2). Biopsy of the lesion between the breasts revealed inflamed verrucous seborrheic keratosis (Figure 3).

We treated the lesion on the right lateral back with cycles of cryotherapy and explained to the patient that the lesion between the breasts was benign. We also reiterated to the patient the importance of wearing sun-protective clothing and UVA/UVB sunblock with a sun protection factor of 30 or higher.

Our patient was diagnosed with pneumonia and subsequently had to discontinue vemurafenib. During the period of nontreatment, the keratotic lesions cleared with postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and no epidermal changes, which showed a possible inference of a direct relationship between the vemurafenib and the appearance of the nonmalignant cutaneous lesions. Although this report only represents 1 patient, other patients possibly can benefit from a modified dose of vemurafenib, which either would resolve or lessen the quantity of these lesions.

Vemurafenib is the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for nonresectable metastatic melanoma with the BRAF V600E mutation as detected by a US Food and Drug Administration-approved test.^1,2 Mutated BRAF is present in approximately 60% of cutaneous melanomas.³ Vemurafenib targets the oncogenic BRAF V600E making the protein inactive, thus inhibiting cell proliferation and leading to apoptosis and shrinkage of the metastatic tumors.^3-5 Vemurafenib has a response rate of more than 50% and is associated with rapid improvement in quality of life.³

Cutaneous side effects include increased incidence of squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthomas, appearing approximately 7 to 8 weeks after starting vemurafenib.⁴ The incidence of these lesions increases in patients 65 years and older and in patients with prior skin cancer and chronic sun exposure. The paradoxical activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by mutant BRAF-selective inhibitors provides an explanation of the induction of squamous cell carcinomas.⁴ Prior to the initiation of vemurafenib, all patients should receive a total-body skin examination and every 2 months thereafter while on treatment. After discontinuation of the medicine, the patient should continue to receive total-body skin evaluations every 6 months indefinitely.

Patients should be aware of the potential for mild to severe photosensitivity reactions. They should be advised to limit their sun exposure time and to wear sun-protective clothing when outdoors. The use of broad-spectrum UVA/UVB sunscreen and lip protectant with a sun protection factor of 30 or higher also should be stressed.^6,7 Patients should be aware that UVA rays penetrate glass; therefore, UV-protective clothing should be worn throughout the day and during all seasons.⁷

In clinical trials of vemurafenib, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis was reported in 2 patients.^8,9 Clinical trials also reported patients developing new primary malignant melanoma lesions.¹⁰ These findings further emphasize the need for patients to undergo total-body skin examinations during and after treatment.

Other possible dermatologic reactions include a generalized rash, erythema, alopecia, and pruritus.^2,3 The development of benign growths associated with patients on vemurafenib include follicular plugging seen in keratosis pilaris, palmar and plantar hyperkeratosis, seborrheic dermatitis-like rashes, verrucous keratosis, and acantholytic dyskeratosis.^8,11,12

We report a case of nonmalignant growths occurring 8 days after starting vemurafenib. This case illustrates potential cutaneous adverse reactions that were benign yet still of great concern to our patient. Many of these nonmalignant cutaneous findings are associated with abnormal follicular keratinization thought to be secondary to abnormal signaling of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway that occurs with the use of BRAF inhibitors.⁸ Although in this case malignant lesions were not discovered, the need for total-body skin examinations exists during all stages of treatment. Supportive care and reassurance should be given to patients along with local treatments including topical therapies (steroids, retinoids), cryotherapy, and biopsies or excisions when necessary.^13,14

To the Editor:

A 53-year-old woman was referred by her oncologist to our dermatology office with lesions on the face and body that presented 8 days after starting vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily for metastatic melanoma. The patient denied any symptoms from the lesions but was concerned they would spread to cover her entire face and body.

The patient's medical history included a diagnosis of metastatic melanoma 6 years prior to presentation. She stated that the primary cutaneous melanoma site was unknown. The patient had endured numerous surgeries to excise lymph node tumors, with some lesions up to 3 cm. The patient recently started vemurafenib, a treatment for BRAF V600E mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. The patient's personal history was notable for hepatitis A, B, and C, and her family history revealed her mother had metastatic lung cancer.

Physical examination revealed numerous 2- to 3-mm, round-oval, flesh-colored to light-brown papules on the cheeks, chest, abdomen (Figure 1), back, and both arms and legs. Some papules were inflamed and some had a stuck-on appearance. Lesions on the chest between the breasts and inframammary region were slightly inflamed. Two skin biopsies were performed. Biopsy of the lesion on the right lateral back revealed solar lentigo, early macular seborrheic keratosis, and a focus of inflamed mild solar keratosis. The dermis showed a mild superficial perivascular and interstitial inflammatory infiltrate composed mostly of lymphocytes, histiocytes, and eosinophils. There were occasional melanophages present (Figure 2). Biopsy of the lesion between the breasts revealed inflamed verrucous seborrheic keratosis (Figure 3).

We treated the lesion on the right lateral back with cycles of cryotherapy and explained to the patient that the lesion between the breasts was benign. We also reiterated to the patient the importance of wearing sun-protective clothing and UVA/UVB sunblock with a sun protection factor of 30 or higher.

Our patient was diagnosed with pneumonia and subsequently had to discontinue vemurafenib. During the period of nontreatment, the keratotic lesions cleared with postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and no epidermal changes, which showed a possible inference of a direct relationship between the vemurafenib and the appearance of the nonmalignant cutaneous lesions. Although this report only represents 1 patient, other patients possibly can benefit from a modified dose of vemurafenib, which either would resolve or lessen the quantity of these lesions.

Vemurafenib is the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for nonresectable metastatic melanoma with the BRAF V600E mutation as detected by a US Food and Drug Administration-approved test.^1,2 Mutated BRAF is present in approximately 60% of cutaneous melanomas.³ Vemurafenib targets the oncogenic BRAF V600E making the protein inactive, thus inhibiting cell proliferation and leading to apoptosis and shrinkage of the metastatic tumors.^3-5 Vemurafenib has a response rate of more than 50% and is associated with rapid improvement in quality of life.³

Cutaneous side effects include increased incidence of squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthomas, appearing approximately 7 to 8 weeks after starting vemurafenib.⁴ The incidence of these lesions increases in patients 65 years and older and in patients with prior skin cancer and chronic sun exposure. The paradoxical activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by mutant BRAF-selective inhibitors provides an explanation of the induction of squamous cell carcinomas.⁴ Prior to the initiation of vemurafenib, all patients should receive a total-body skin examination and every 2 months thereafter while on treatment. After discontinuation of the medicine, the patient should continue to receive total-body skin evaluations every 6 months indefinitely.

Patients should be aware of the potential for mild to severe photosensitivity reactions. They should be advised to limit their sun exposure time and to wear sun-protective clothing when outdoors. The use of broad-spectrum UVA/UVB sunscreen and lip protectant with a sun protection factor of 30 or higher also should be stressed.^6,7 Patients should be aware that UVA rays penetrate glass; therefore, UV-protective clothing should be worn throughout the day and during all seasons.⁷

In clinical trials of vemurafenib, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis was reported in 2 patients.^8,9 Clinical trials also reported patients developing new primary malignant melanoma lesions.¹⁰ These findings further emphasize the need for patients to undergo total-body skin examinations during and after treatment.

Other possible dermatologic reactions include a generalized rash, erythema, alopecia, and pruritus.^2,3 The development of benign growths associated with patients on vemurafenib include follicular plugging seen in keratosis pilaris, palmar and plantar hyperkeratosis, seborrheic dermatitis-like rashes, verrucous keratosis, and acantholytic dyskeratosis.^8,11,12

We report a case of nonmalignant growths occurring 8 days after starting vemurafenib. This case illustrates potential cutaneous adverse reactions that were benign yet still of great concern to our patient. Many of these nonmalignant cutaneous findings are associated with abnormal follicular keratinization thought to be secondary to abnormal signaling of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway that occurs with the use of BRAF inhibitors.⁸ Although in this case malignant lesions were not discovered, the need for total-body skin examinations exists during all stages of treatment. Supportive care and reassurance should be given to patients along with local treatments including topical therapies (steroids, retinoids), cryotherapy, and biopsies or excisions when necessary.^13,14

To the Editor:

A 53-year-old woman was referred by her oncologist to our dermatology office with lesions on the face and body that presented 8 days after starting vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily for metastatic melanoma. The patient denied any symptoms from the lesions but was concerned they would spread to cover her entire face and body.

The patient's medical history included a diagnosis of metastatic melanoma 6 years prior to presentation. She stated that the primary cutaneous melanoma site was unknown. The patient had endured numerous surgeries to excise lymph node tumors, with some lesions up to 3 cm. The patient recently started vemurafenib, a treatment for BRAF V600E mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. The patient's personal history was notable for hepatitis A, B, and C, and her family history revealed her mother had metastatic lung cancer.

Physical examination revealed numerous 2- to 3-mm, round-oval, flesh-colored to light-brown papules on the cheeks, chest, abdomen (Figure 1), back, and both arms and legs. Some papules were inflamed and some had a stuck-on appearance. Lesions on the chest between the breasts and inframammary region were slightly inflamed. Two skin biopsies were performed. Biopsy of the lesion on the right lateral back revealed solar lentigo, early macular seborrheic keratosis, and a focus of inflamed mild solar keratosis. The dermis showed a mild superficial perivascular and interstitial inflammatory infiltrate composed mostly of lymphocytes, histiocytes, and eosinophils. There were occasional melanophages present (Figure 2). Biopsy of the lesion between the breasts revealed inflamed verrucous seborrheic keratosis (Figure 3).

We treated the lesion on the right lateral back with cycles of cryotherapy and explained to the patient that the lesion between the breasts was benign. We also reiterated to the patient the importance of wearing sun-protective clothing and UVA/UVB sunblock with a sun protection factor of 30 or higher.

Our patient was diagnosed with pneumonia and subsequently had to discontinue vemurafenib. During the period of nontreatment, the keratotic lesions cleared with postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and no epidermal changes, which showed a possible inference of a direct relationship between the vemurafenib and the appearance of the nonmalignant cutaneous lesions. Although this report only represents 1 patient, other patients possibly can benefit from a modified dose of vemurafenib, which either would resolve or lessen the quantity of these lesions.

Vemurafenib is the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for nonresectable metastatic melanoma with the BRAF V600E mutation as detected by a US Food and Drug Administration-approved test.^1,2 Mutated BRAF is present in approximately 60% of cutaneous melanomas.³ Vemurafenib targets the oncogenic BRAF V600E making the protein inactive, thus inhibiting cell proliferation and leading to apoptosis and shrinkage of the metastatic tumors.^3-5 Vemurafenib has a response rate of more than 50% and is associated with rapid improvement in quality of life.³

Cutaneous side effects include increased incidence of squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthomas, appearing approximately 7 to 8 weeks after starting vemurafenib.⁴ The incidence of these lesions increases in patients 65 years and older and in patients with prior skin cancer and chronic sun exposure. The paradoxical activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by mutant BRAF-selective inhibitors provides an explanation of the induction of squamous cell carcinomas.⁴ Prior to the initiation of vemurafenib, all patients should receive a total-body skin examination and every 2 months thereafter while on treatment. After discontinuation of the medicine, the patient should continue to receive total-body skin evaluations every 6 months indefinitely.

Patients should be aware of the potential for mild to severe photosensitivity reactions. They should be advised to limit their sun exposure time and to wear sun-protective clothing when outdoors. The use of broad-spectrum UVA/UVB sunscreen and lip protectant with a sun protection factor of 30 or higher also should be stressed.^6,7 Patients should be aware that UVA rays penetrate glass; therefore, UV-protective clothing should be worn throughout the day and during all seasons.⁷

In clinical trials of vemurafenib, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis was reported in 2 patients.^8,9 Clinical trials also reported patients developing new primary malignant melanoma lesions.¹⁰ These findings further emphasize the need for patients to undergo total-body skin examinations during and after treatment.

Other possible dermatologic reactions include a generalized rash, erythema, alopecia, and pruritus.^2,3 The development of benign growths associated with patients on vemurafenib include follicular plugging seen in keratosis pilaris, palmar and plantar hyperkeratosis, seborrheic dermatitis-like rashes, verrucous keratosis, and acantholytic dyskeratosis.^8,11,12

We report a case of nonmalignant growths occurring 8 days after starting vemurafenib. This case illustrates potential cutaneous adverse reactions that were benign yet still of great concern to our patient. Many of these nonmalignant cutaneous findings are associated with abnormal follicular keratinization thought to be secondary to abnormal signaling of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway that occurs with the use of BRAF inhibitors.⁸ Although in this case malignant lesions were not discovered, the need for total-body skin examinations exists during all stages of treatment. Supportive care and reassurance should be given to patients along with local treatments including topical therapies (steroids, retinoids), cryotherapy, and biopsies or excisions when necessary.^13,14

To the Editor:

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common and serious complication seen most often with bone marrow transplantation and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. With these therapies, functional lymphoid cells are transferred from an immunocompetent donor into a nongenetically identical recipient, or "host." Because of the allogeneic nature of these transplants, the transplanted lymphoid cells have a high potential to recognize and treat the host's cells as foreign, and the resultant clinical and pathologic picture is that of GVHD. The primary organ systems affected in this immune response are the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and hepatobiliary system.^1,2 Cutaneous manifestations are by far the most common.³

Although notable gains have been made in elucidating the causes, risk factors, and mechanisms that result in the clinical picture of GVHD, gaps in our knowledge and understanding still exist. Our patient represents a unique case of unilateral GVHD occurring along Blaschko lines, which has important implications for both recognizing and understanding the pathogenesis of GVHD.

A 35-year-old woman was diagnosed with stage IV follicular lymphoma and received various chemotherapy regimens over the next 4 years. Unfortunately, her disease progressed despite treatment. At 39 years of age, she underwent a nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from a single HLA-mismatched sibling. She was placed on prednisone and cyclosporine for immunosuppression. High-dose acyclovir prophylaxis also was initiated given her history of zoster affecting the right C3 dermatome. Successful engraftment was achieved, with molecular studies showing 100% of cells following transplantation were of donor origin. Restaging at 1 and 2 years following transplantation found her to be in complete remission.

At 2 years following transplantation, she began a slow taper of immunosuppressive medications. She was successfully weaned off prednisone and continued to gradually reduce the cyclosporine dose. Toward the end of the cyclosporine taper 3 months later, she developed a pruritic eruption on the left proximal arm.

She was seen in a bone marrow transplant clinic 4 weeks after the rash developed. On examination, she had multiple, violaceous, lichenoid papules coalescing into linear bandlike plaques. One plaque extended along the left upper arm and 2 others encircled the left hemithorax, respecting the midline. She was treated empirically for zoster with valacyclovir 1 g 3 times daily based on the presumed dermatomal distribution of the eruption. Despite treatment, the rash progressed, and she developed fever. Eight days later, she was admitted with concern for disseminated zoster (Figure). Viral tissue cultures and polymerase chain reaction analysis of the lesions were negative for varicella-zoster virus and herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2. Biopsies of skin lesions on the arm and trunk were both consistent with GVHD. 

Given the clinical history, characteristic lesion morphology, and distinct linear distribution along with histopathological confirmation, a diagnosis of GVHD along Blaschko lines was made. Recognizing the cause to be immunogenic rather than infectious, immunosuppressive medications were started. In addition to increasing the prednisone and cyclosporine back to therapeutic levels, she received weekly methylprednisolone. With treatment, she showed gradual but marked improvement.

Six cases of linear GVHD have occurred as an isotopic response along dermatomes previously affected by varicella-zoster virus.^4-8 These cases give credence to the idea that a cutaneous viral infection may alter the skin through unknown mechanisms, predisposing it to become affected by GVHD. Notably, this phenomenon occurred despite absence of a persistent viral genome when assessed using polymerase chain reaction analysis.⁴

An additional 3 cases of GVHD occurring in a dermatomal distribution without any prior infections in those areas have been reported.^9,10 Of note, 2 of 3 patients did have episodes of zoster occur at other sites following transplantation and did not develop GVHD symptoms in any of those locations.⁹ Interestingly, controversy exists as to whether the distribution of these lesions was dermatomal or followed Blaschko lines.¹¹

Two cases of linear GVHD have been reported in which lesions were identified as occurring along Blaschko lines.^12,13 The lines of Blaschko, first described in 1901, correspond to cellular migration patterns during embryological development.¹⁴ Postzygotic mutations causing epidermal cell mosaicism may result in skin disorders occurring in segmental areas defined by the Blaschko lines.^15-17 Accordingly, the Blaschko-linear pattern in GVHD suggests cellular mosaicism as the etiology in this case. Although the host's immune system develops immunotolerance to both cellular lineages during maturation, transplanted lymphoid cells from a nongenetically identical sibling may identify just one of the cell lines as nonself, producing a selective pattern of GVHD¹⁸ confined to the distribution of the genetically disparate cell line, which occurs along the lines of Blaschko in the skin. Candidate genes for mutations that would produce a mosaic following transplant GVHD include any of the 25 to 30 known minor histocompatibility antigens (or any of the several hundred yet to be found).¹⁹ Although well established for monogenic dominant disorders, in 2007 it was recognized that a postzygotic mutation can cause many complex polygenetic disorders, including GVHD, to manifest in a limited segmental pattern. This understanding, along with retrospective case review, has brought into question previously reported "dermatomal" or "zosteriform" presentations of GVHD, asserting that the linear patterns were misidentified and thus inappropriately attributed to a postviral response.²⁰ Recognition of the Blaschko-linear distribution holds significance in both identifying lesion etiology and understanding disease pathogenesis and treatment.

Our patient illustrates a case of a Blaschko-linear GVHD. The distinctive pattern of her physical findings strongly favored epidermal cell mosaicism as the etiology of her disease. More than just a phenotypically unique case, it provided further insight into the complex etiology underlying GVHD and iterated the basic concepts of Blaschko lines and genetic alterations in development.

To the Editor:

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common and serious complication seen most often with bone marrow transplantation and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. With these therapies, functional lymphoid cells are transferred from an immunocompetent donor into a nongenetically identical recipient, or "host." Because of the allogeneic nature of these transplants, the transplanted lymphoid cells have a high potential to recognize and treat the host's cells as foreign, and the resultant clinical and pathologic picture is that of GVHD. The primary organ systems affected in this immune response are the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and hepatobiliary system.^1,2 Cutaneous manifestations are by far the most common.³

Although notable gains have been made in elucidating the causes, risk factors, and mechanisms that result in the clinical picture of GVHD, gaps in our knowledge and understanding still exist. Our patient represents a unique case of unilateral GVHD occurring along Blaschko lines, which has important implications for both recognizing and understanding the pathogenesis of GVHD.

A 35-year-old woman was diagnosed with stage IV follicular lymphoma and received various chemotherapy regimens over the next 4 years. Unfortunately, her disease progressed despite treatment. At 39 years of age, she underwent a nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from a single HLA-mismatched sibling. She was placed on prednisone and cyclosporine for immunosuppression. High-dose acyclovir prophylaxis also was initiated given her history of zoster affecting the right C3 dermatome. Successful engraftment was achieved, with molecular studies showing 100% of cells following transplantation were of donor origin. Restaging at 1 and 2 years following transplantation found her to be in complete remission.

At 2 years following transplantation, she began a slow taper of immunosuppressive medications. She was successfully weaned off prednisone and continued to gradually reduce the cyclosporine dose. Toward the end of the cyclosporine taper 3 months later, she developed a pruritic eruption on the left proximal arm.

She was seen in a bone marrow transplant clinic 4 weeks after the rash developed. On examination, she had multiple, violaceous, lichenoid papules coalescing into linear bandlike plaques. One plaque extended along the left upper arm and 2 others encircled the left hemithorax, respecting the midline. She was treated empirically for zoster with valacyclovir 1 g 3 times daily based on the presumed dermatomal distribution of the eruption. Despite treatment, the rash progressed, and she developed fever. Eight days later, she was admitted with concern for disseminated zoster (Figure). Viral tissue cultures and polymerase chain reaction analysis of the lesions were negative for varicella-zoster virus and herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2. Biopsies of skin lesions on the arm and trunk were both consistent with GVHD. 

Given the clinical history, characteristic lesion morphology, and distinct linear distribution along with histopathological confirmation, a diagnosis of GVHD along Blaschko lines was made. Recognizing the cause to be immunogenic rather than infectious, immunosuppressive medications were started. In addition to increasing the prednisone and cyclosporine back to therapeutic levels, she received weekly methylprednisolone. With treatment, she showed gradual but marked improvement.

Six cases of linear GVHD have occurred as an isotopic response along dermatomes previously affected by varicella-zoster virus.^4-8 These cases give credence to the idea that a cutaneous viral infection may alter the skin through unknown mechanisms, predisposing it to become affected by GVHD. Notably, this phenomenon occurred despite absence of a persistent viral genome when assessed using polymerase chain reaction analysis.⁴

An additional 3 cases of GVHD occurring in a dermatomal distribution without any prior infections in those areas have been reported.^9,10 Of note, 2 of 3 patients did have episodes of zoster occur at other sites following transplantation and did not develop GVHD symptoms in any of those locations.⁹ Interestingly, controversy exists as to whether the distribution of these lesions was dermatomal or followed Blaschko lines.¹¹

Two cases of linear GVHD have been reported in which lesions were identified as occurring along Blaschko lines.^12,13 The lines of Blaschko, first described in 1901, correspond to cellular migration patterns during embryological development.¹⁴ Postzygotic mutations causing epidermal cell mosaicism may result in skin disorders occurring in segmental areas defined by the Blaschko lines.^15-17 Accordingly, the Blaschko-linear pattern in GVHD suggests cellular mosaicism as the etiology in this case. Although the host's immune system develops immunotolerance to both cellular lineages during maturation, transplanted lymphoid cells from a nongenetically identical sibling may identify just one of the cell lines as nonself, producing a selective pattern of GVHD¹⁸ confined to the distribution of the genetically disparate cell line, which occurs along the lines of Blaschko in the skin. Candidate genes for mutations that would produce a mosaic following transplant GVHD include any of the 25 to 30 known minor histocompatibility antigens (or any of the several hundred yet to be found).¹⁹ Although well established for monogenic dominant disorders, in 2007 it was recognized that a postzygotic mutation can cause many complex polygenetic disorders, including GVHD, to manifest in a limited segmental pattern. This understanding, along with retrospective case review, has brought into question previously reported "dermatomal" or "zosteriform" presentations of GVHD, asserting that the linear patterns were misidentified and thus inappropriately attributed to a postviral response.²⁰ Recognition of the Blaschko-linear distribution holds significance in both identifying lesion etiology and understanding disease pathogenesis and treatment.

Our patient illustrates a case of a Blaschko-linear GVHD. The distinctive pattern of her physical findings strongly favored epidermal cell mosaicism as the etiology of her disease. More than just a phenotypically unique case, it provided further insight into the complex etiology underlying GVHD and iterated the basic concepts of Blaschko lines and genetic alterations in development.

To the Editor:

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common and serious complication seen most often with bone marrow transplantation and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. With these therapies, functional lymphoid cells are transferred from an immunocompetent donor into a nongenetically identical recipient, or "host." Because of the allogeneic nature of these transplants, the transplanted lymphoid cells have a high potential to recognize and treat the host's cells as foreign, and the resultant clinical and pathologic picture is that of GVHD. The primary organ systems affected in this immune response are the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and hepatobiliary system.^1,2 Cutaneous manifestations are by far the most common.³

Although notable gains have been made in elucidating the causes, risk factors, and mechanisms that result in the clinical picture of GVHD, gaps in our knowledge and understanding still exist. Our patient represents a unique case of unilateral GVHD occurring along Blaschko lines, which has important implications for both recognizing and understanding the pathogenesis of GVHD.

A 35-year-old woman was diagnosed with stage IV follicular lymphoma and received various chemotherapy regimens over the next 4 years. Unfortunately, her disease progressed despite treatment. At 39 years of age, she underwent a nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from a single HLA-mismatched sibling. She was placed on prednisone and cyclosporine for immunosuppression. High-dose acyclovir prophylaxis also was initiated given her history of zoster affecting the right C3 dermatome. Successful engraftment was achieved, with molecular studies showing 100% of cells following transplantation were of donor origin. Restaging at 1 and 2 years following transplantation found her to be in complete remission.

At 2 years following transplantation, she began a slow taper of immunosuppressive medications. She was successfully weaned off prednisone and continued to gradually reduce the cyclosporine dose. Toward the end of the cyclosporine taper 3 months later, she developed a pruritic eruption on the left proximal arm.

She was seen in a bone marrow transplant clinic 4 weeks after the rash developed. On examination, she had multiple, violaceous, lichenoid papules coalescing into linear bandlike plaques. One plaque extended along the left upper arm and 2 others encircled the left hemithorax, respecting the midline. She was treated empirically for zoster with valacyclovir 1 g 3 times daily based on the presumed dermatomal distribution of the eruption. Despite treatment, the rash progressed, and she developed fever. Eight days later, she was admitted with concern for disseminated zoster (Figure). Viral tissue cultures and polymerase chain reaction analysis of the lesions were negative for varicella-zoster virus and herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2. Biopsies of skin lesions on the arm and trunk were both consistent with GVHD. 

Given the clinical history, characteristic lesion morphology, and distinct linear distribution along with histopathological confirmation, a diagnosis of GVHD along Blaschko lines was made. Recognizing the cause to be immunogenic rather than infectious, immunosuppressive medications were started. In addition to increasing the prednisone and cyclosporine back to therapeutic levels, she received weekly methylprednisolone. With treatment, she showed gradual but marked improvement.

Six cases of linear GVHD have occurred as an isotopic response along dermatomes previously affected by varicella-zoster virus.^4-8 These cases give credence to the idea that a cutaneous viral infection may alter the skin through unknown mechanisms, predisposing it to become affected by GVHD. Notably, this phenomenon occurred despite absence of a persistent viral genome when assessed using polymerase chain reaction analysis.⁴

An additional 3 cases of GVHD occurring in a dermatomal distribution without any prior infections in those areas have been reported.^9,10 Of note, 2 of 3 patients did have episodes of zoster occur at other sites following transplantation and did not develop GVHD symptoms in any of those locations.⁹ Interestingly, controversy exists as to whether the distribution of these lesions was dermatomal or followed Blaschko lines.¹¹

Two cases of linear GVHD have been reported in which lesions were identified as occurring along Blaschko lines.^12,13 The lines of Blaschko, first described in 1901, correspond to cellular migration patterns during embryological development.¹⁴ Postzygotic mutations causing epidermal cell mosaicism may result in skin disorders occurring in segmental areas defined by the Blaschko lines.^15-17 Accordingly, the Blaschko-linear pattern in GVHD suggests cellular mosaicism as the etiology in this case. Although the host's immune system develops immunotolerance to both cellular lineages during maturation, transplanted lymphoid cells from a nongenetically identical sibling may identify just one of the cell lines as nonself, producing a selective pattern of GVHD¹⁸ confined to the distribution of the genetically disparate cell line, which occurs along the lines of Blaschko in the skin. Candidate genes for mutations that would produce a mosaic following transplant GVHD include any of the 25 to 30 known minor histocompatibility antigens (or any of the several hundred yet to be found).¹⁹ Although well established for monogenic dominant disorders, in 2007 it was recognized that a postzygotic mutation can cause many complex polygenetic disorders, including GVHD, to manifest in a limited segmental pattern. This understanding, along with retrospective case review, has brought into question previously reported "dermatomal" or "zosteriform" presentations of GVHD, asserting that the linear patterns were misidentified and thus inappropriately attributed to a postviral response.²⁰ Recognition of the Blaschko-linear distribution holds significance in both identifying lesion etiology and understanding disease pathogenesis and treatment.

Our patient illustrates a case of a Blaschko-linear GVHD. The distinctive pattern of her physical findings strongly favored epidermal cell mosaicism as the etiology of her disease. More than just a phenotypically unique case, it provided further insight into the complex etiology underlying GVHD and iterated the basic concepts of Blaschko lines and genetic alterations in development.

To the Editor:

Richner-Hanhart syndrome, also known as tyrosinemia type II or oculocutaneous tyrosinemia, is a rare autosomal-recessive, childhood-onset, metabolic hereditary disease.¹ A deficiency of tyrosine aminotransferase leads to an accumulation of tyrosine amino acid. It is characterized by the association of palmoplantar hyperkeratosis, bilateral keratitis, and neurological disorders.

An 18-month-old girl with recurrent warts of 6 months' duration was admitted to the dermatology department. She had been treated repeatedly with acyclovir for recurrent bilateral herpetic keratitis with major photophobia since 9 months of age with no response. Clinical presentation included punctate hyperkeratosis of the fingers and toes (Figure, A), severe photophobia with decreased visual acuity, and speech delay.

Her medical record showed a break of the growth curve with a weight of 9.25 kg (3rd percentile), a height of 80 cm (50th percentile), and a head circumference of 45 cm (50th percentile). Her parents were nonconsanguineous. The association of bilateral dendritic keratitis with punctate palmoplantar keratosis suggested a diagnosis of Richner-Hanhart syndrome. Diagnosis was confirmed by an elevated plasma level of tyrosine (1580 µmol/L; reference range, 40-80 µmol/L).

A low tyrosine and low phenylalanine diet (no animal proteins) was immediately introduced, with supplementation of amino acids, vitamins, and trace elements. After 8 days, the plasma level of tyrosinemia decreased by a factor of 4 (392 µmol/L). After 1 month, the cutaneous and ocular lesions completely resolved (Figure, B). Discrete psychomotor slowing still persisted for 1 year and then reached complete normalization. Genetic analysis showed a composite heterozygous mutation of the tyrosine aminotransferase gene, TAT, on chromosome 16. The mutation detected in the patient's mother was an A to V substitution at codon 147 (A147V). The second mutation was detected in the father; it was an 8 nucleotides duplication and then a substitution leading to a premature stop codon at codon 37 (R37X).

Richner-Hanhart syndrome is a rare autosomal-recessive disorder that is more common in Italy and in areas where inbreeding is prevalent^1,2; however, no data are available on disease prevalence. It is caused by a homozygous mutation in the TAT gene located on chromosome 16q22.³ Tyrosine aminotransferase is an important enzyme involved in the tyrosine and phenylalanine metabolic degradation pathway located in the hepatic cytosol. Symptoms are due to the accumulation of tyrosine and its metabolite. Diagnosis is confirmed by an elevated plasma level of tyrosine (>500 µmol/L). This oculocutaneous syndrome is characterized by bilateral pseudodendritic keratitis, palmoplantar hyperkeratosis, and a variable degree of mental retardation.1 In contrast to tyrosinemia type II, types I and III do not affect the skin.

Intrafamilial and interfamilial phenotypic variability is reported. A large spectrum of mutations within the TAT gene have been reported.^4-7 These mutations lead to a reduction or an absence in the activity of hepatic tyrosine aminotransferase. The degradation pathway of tyrosine involving TAT occurs mainly in the liver. This process also is present in the mitochondria where the enzyme is called aspartate aminotransferase.^1,2 The mechanism by which Richner-Hanhart syndrome causes painful palmoplantar keratosis and keratitis remains unknown. It has been suggested that intracellular L-tyrosine crystals initiate an inflammation process resulting in the typical skin lesions and keratitis.⁸ There is some evidence that patients with higher values of tyrosine in early life are more likely to develop neurological problems.¹ In addition, phenotype variability has been observed, even among individuals sharing the same pathogenic mutation.⁴

Tyrosinemia type II typically demonstrates ocular symptoms (75% of cases) that usually occur in the first year of life.⁸ They are characterized by photophobia, redness, and increase of lacrimation. Examination reveals a superficial and bilateral punctate keratosis with corneal dystrophy, often misdiagnosed as herpetic keratosis, as in our case, which may delay the diagnosis.^9,10 Bilateral ocular lesions are suggestive, even if they are asymmetric.^8,11 Furthermore, negative fluorescein staining, negative culture, and resistance to antiviral treatment exclude the diagnosis of herpetic keratosis.^9,10

Skin lesions (85% of cases) typically appear in the first year of life. They are characterized by painful, irregular, limited, punctate hyperkeratosis on the palms and soles.¹ They are more frequent in weight-bearing areas and tend to improve during summer, possibly due to a seasonal change in dietary behavior.^4,12 Hyperkeratotic papules in a linear pattern also have been described on the flexor aspects of the fingers or toes.¹³ In our case, the lesions were misdiagnosed as warts for 6 months.

Retarded development affects 60% of patients with tyrosinemia type II. Expression of neurological symptoms is variable and could include mental retardation, nystagmus, tremors, ataxia, and convulsion.⁴ Lifetime follow-up of these patients is recommended.

Early initiation of a tyrosine-phenylalanine-restricted diet in infancy is the most effective therapy for Richner-Hanhart syndrome.¹³ The enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase normally converts the amino acid phenylalanine into amino acid tyrosine. Thus, dietary treatment of Richner-Hanhart syndrome requires restricting or eliminating foods high in phenylalanine and tyrosine with protein "medical food" substitute. The dietary treatment allows resolution of both eye and skin symptoms after a few days or weeks and also may prevent mental retardation. It is effective in lowering the plasma level to less than 400 µmol/L. The diet must be introduced as soon as Richner-Hanhart syndrome is suspected. Supplementation with essential amino acids, vitamins, and trace elements is needed. Early screening of siblings in families with Richner-Hanhart syndrome history is recommended, even in the absence of clinical findings. Careful dietary control of maternal plasma tyrosine level must be considered during future pregnancy for women.^4,14,15

Richner-Hanhart syndrome should be suspected in patients demonstrating cutaneous lesions, especially palmoplantar keratosis associated with bilateral pseudodendritic corneal lesions unresponsive to antiviral therapy.

To the Editor:

Richner-Hanhart syndrome, also known as tyrosinemia type II or oculocutaneous tyrosinemia, is a rare autosomal-recessive, childhood-onset, metabolic hereditary disease.¹ A deficiency of tyrosine aminotransferase leads to an accumulation of tyrosine amino acid. It is characterized by the association of palmoplantar hyperkeratosis, bilateral keratitis, and neurological disorders.

An 18-month-old girl with recurrent warts of 6 months' duration was admitted to the dermatology department. She had been treated repeatedly with acyclovir for recurrent bilateral herpetic keratitis with major photophobia since 9 months of age with no response. Clinical presentation included punctate hyperkeratosis of the fingers and toes (Figure, A), severe photophobia with decreased visual acuity, and speech delay.

Her medical record showed a break of the growth curve with a weight of 9.25 kg (3rd percentile), a height of 80 cm (50th percentile), and a head circumference of 45 cm (50th percentile). Her parents were nonconsanguineous. The association of bilateral dendritic keratitis with punctate palmoplantar keratosis suggested a diagnosis of Richner-Hanhart syndrome. Diagnosis was confirmed by an elevated plasma level of tyrosine (1580 µmol/L; reference range, 40-80 µmol/L).

A low tyrosine and low phenylalanine diet (no animal proteins) was immediately introduced, with supplementation of amino acids, vitamins, and trace elements. After 8 days, the plasma level of tyrosinemia decreased by a factor of 4 (392 µmol/L). After 1 month, the cutaneous and ocular lesions completely resolved (Figure, B). Discrete psychomotor slowing still persisted for 1 year and then reached complete normalization. Genetic analysis showed a composite heterozygous mutation of the tyrosine aminotransferase gene, TAT, on chromosome 16. The mutation detected in the patient's mother was an A to V substitution at codon 147 (A147V). The second mutation was detected in the father; it was an 8 nucleotides duplication and then a substitution leading to a premature stop codon at codon 37 (R37X).

Richner-Hanhart syndrome is a rare autosomal-recessive disorder that is more common in Italy and in areas where inbreeding is prevalent^1,2; however, no data are available on disease prevalence. It is caused by a homozygous mutation in the TAT gene located on chromosome 16q22.³ Tyrosine aminotransferase is an important enzyme involved in the tyrosine and phenylalanine metabolic degradation pathway located in the hepatic cytosol. Symptoms are due to the accumulation of tyrosine and its metabolite. Diagnosis is confirmed by an elevated plasma level of tyrosine (>500 µmol/L). This oculocutaneous syndrome is characterized by bilateral pseudodendritic keratitis, palmoplantar hyperkeratosis, and a variable degree of mental retardation.1 In contrast to tyrosinemia type II, types I and III do not affect the skin.

Intrafamilial and interfamilial phenotypic variability is reported. A large spectrum of mutations within the TAT gene have been reported.^4-7 These mutations lead to a reduction or an absence in the activity of hepatic tyrosine aminotransferase. The degradation pathway of tyrosine involving TAT occurs mainly in the liver. This process also is present in the mitochondria where the enzyme is called aspartate aminotransferase.^1,2 The mechanism by which Richner-Hanhart syndrome causes painful palmoplantar keratosis and keratitis remains unknown. It has been suggested that intracellular L-tyrosine crystals initiate an inflammation process resulting in the typical skin lesions and keratitis.⁸ There is some evidence that patients with higher values of tyrosine in early life are more likely to develop neurological problems.¹ In addition, phenotype variability has been observed, even among individuals sharing the same pathogenic mutation.⁴

Tyrosinemia type II typically demonstrates ocular symptoms (75% of cases) that usually occur in the first year of life.⁸ They are characterized by photophobia, redness, and increase of lacrimation. Examination reveals a superficial and bilateral punctate keratosis with corneal dystrophy, often misdiagnosed as herpetic keratosis, as in our case, which may delay the diagnosis.^9,10 Bilateral ocular lesions are suggestive, even if they are asymmetric.^8,11 Furthermore, negative fluorescein staining, negative culture, and resistance to antiviral treatment exclude the diagnosis of herpetic keratosis.^9,10

Skin lesions (85% of cases) typically appear in the first year of life. They are characterized by painful, irregular, limited, punctate hyperkeratosis on the palms and soles.¹ They are more frequent in weight-bearing areas and tend to improve during summer, possibly due to a seasonal change in dietary behavior.^4,12 Hyperkeratotic papules in a linear pattern also have been described on the flexor aspects of the fingers or toes.¹³ In our case, the lesions were misdiagnosed as warts for 6 months.

Retarded development affects 60% of patients with tyrosinemia type II. Expression of neurological symptoms is variable and could include mental retardation, nystagmus, tremors, ataxia, and convulsion.⁴ Lifetime follow-up of these patients is recommended.

Early initiation of a tyrosine-phenylalanine-restricted diet in infancy is the most effective therapy for Richner-Hanhart syndrome.¹³ The enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase normally converts the amino acid phenylalanine into amino acid tyrosine. Thus, dietary treatment of Richner-Hanhart syndrome requires restricting or eliminating foods high in phenylalanine and tyrosine with protein "medical food" substitute. The dietary treatment allows resolution of both eye and skin symptoms after a few days or weeks and also may prevent mental retardation. It is effective in lowering the plasma level to less than 400 µmol/L. The diet must be introduced as soon as Richner-Hanhart syndrome is suspected. Supplementation with essential amino acids, vitamins, and trace elements is needed. Early screening of siblings in families with Richner-Hanhart syndrome history is recommended, even in the absence of clinical findings. Careful dietary control of maternal plasma tyrosine level must be considered during future pregnancy for women.^4,14,15

Richner-Hanhart syndrome should be suspected in patients demonstrating cutaneous lesions, especially palmoplantar keratosis associated with bilateral pseudodendritic corneal lesions unresponsive to antiviral therapy.

To the Editor:

Richner-Hanhart syndrome, also known as tyrosinemia type II or oculocutaneous tyrosinemia, is a rare autosomal-recessive, childhood-onset, metabolic hereditary disease.¹ A deficiency of tyrosine aminotransferase leads to an accumulation of tyrosine amino acid. It is characterized by the association of palmoplantar hyperkeratosis, bilateral keratitis, and neurological disorders.

An 18-month-old girl with recurrent warts of 6 months' duration was admitted to the dermatology department. She had been treated repeatedly with acyclovir for recurrent bilateral herpetic keratitis with major photophobia since 9 months of age with no response. Clinical presentation included punctate hyperkeratosis of the fingers and toes (Figure, A), severe photophobia with decreased visual acuity, and speech delay.

Her medical record showed a break of the growth curve with a weight of 9.25 kg (3rd percentile), a height of 80 cm (50th percentile), and a head circumference of 45 cm (50th percentile). Her parents were nonconsanguineous. The association of bilateral dendritic keratitis with punctate palmoplantar keratosis suggested a diagnosis of Richner-Hanhart syndrome. Diagnosis was confirmed by an elevated plasma level of tyrosine (1580 µmol/L; reference range, 40-80 µmol/L).

A low tyrosine and low phenylalanine diet (no animal proteins) was immediately introduced, with supplementation of amino acids, vitamins, and trace elements. After 8 days, the plasma level of tyrosinemia decreased by a factor of 4 (392 µmol/L). After 1 month, the cutaneous and ocular lesions completely resolved (Figure, B). Discrete psychomotor slowing still persisted for 1 year and then reached complete normalization. Genetic analysis showed a composite heterozygous mutation of the tyrosine aminotransferase gene, TAT, on chromosome 16. The mutation detected in the patient's mother was an A to V substitution at codon 147 (A147V). The second mutation was detected in the father; it was an 8 nucleotides duplication and then a substitution leading to a premature stop codon at codon 37 (R37X).

Richner-Hanhart syndrome is a rare autosomal-recessive disorder that is more common in Italy and in areas where inbreeding is prevalent^1,2; however, no data are available on disease prevalence. It is caused by a homozygous mutation in the TAT gene located on chromosome 16q22.³ Tyrosine aminotransferase is an important enzyme involved in the tyrosine and phenylalanine metabolic degradation pathway located in the hepatic cytosol. Symptoms are due to the accumulation of tyrosine and its metabolite. Diagnosis is confirmed by an elevated plasma level of tyrosine (>500 µmol/L). This oculocutaneous syndrome is characterized by bilateral pseudodendritic keratitis, palmoplantar hyperkeratosis, and a variable degree of mental retardation.1 In contrast to tyrosinemia type II, types I and III do not affect the skin.

Intrafamilial and interfamilial phenotypic variability is reported. A large spectrum of mutations within the TAT gene have been reported.^4-7 These mutations lead to a reduction or an absence in the activity of hepatic tyrosine aminotransferase. The degradation pathway of tyrosine involving TAT occurs mainly in the liver. This process also is present in the mitochondria where the enzyme is called aspartate aminotransferase.^1,2 The mechanism by which Richner-Hanhart syndrome causes painful palmoplantar keratosis and keratitis remains unknown. It has been suggested that intracellular L-tyrosine crystals initiate an inflammation process resulting in the typical skin lesions and keratitis.⁸ There is some evidence that patients with higher values of tyrosine in early life are more likely to develop neurological problems.¹ In addition, phenotype variability has been observed, even among individuals sharing the same pathogenic mutation.⁴

Tyrosinemia type II typically demonstrates ocular symptoms (75% of cases) that usually occur in the first year of life.⁸ They are characterized by photophobia, redness, and increase of lacrimation. Examination reveals a superficial and bilateral punctate keratosis with corneal dystrophy, often misdiagnosed as herpetic keratosis, as in our case, which may delay the diagnosis.^9,10 Bilateral ocular lesions are suggestive, even if they are asymmetric.^8,11 Furthermore, negative fluorescein staining, negative culture, and resistance to antiviral treatment exclude the diagnosis of herpetic keratosis.^9,10

Skin lesions (85% of cases) typically appear in the first year of life. They are characterized by painful, irregular, limited, punctate hyperkeratosis on the palms and soles.¹ They are more frequent in weight-bearing areas and tend to improve during summer, possibly due to a seasonal change in dietary behavior.^4,12 Hyperkeratotic papules in a linear pattern also have been described on the flexor aspects of the fingers or toes.¹³ In our case, the lesions were misdiagnosed as warts for 6 months.

Retarded development affects 60% of patients with tyrosinemia type II. Expression of neurological symptoms is variable and could include mental retardation, nystagmus, tremors, ataxia, and convulsion.⁴ Lifetime follow-up of these patients is recommended.

Early initiation of a tyrosine-phenylalanine-restricted diet in infancy is the most effective therapy for Richner-Hanhart syndrome.¹³ The enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase normally converts the amino acid phenylalanine into amino acid tyrosine. Thus, dietary treatment of Richner-Hanhart syndrome requires restricting or eliminating foods high in phenylalanine and tyrosine with protein "medical food" substitute. The dietary treatment allows resolution of both eye and skin symptoms after a few days or weeks and also may prevent mental retardation. It is effective in lowering the plasma level to less than 400 µmol/L. The diet must be introduced as soon as Richner-Hanhart syndrome is suspected. Supplementation with essential amino acids, vitamins, and trace elements is needed. Early screening of siblings in families with Richner-Hanhart syndrome history is recommended, even in the absence of clinical findings. Careful dietary control of maternal plasma tyrosine level must be considered during future pregnancy for women.^4,14,15

Richner-Hanhart syndrome should be suspected in patients demonstrating cutaneous lesions, especially palmoplantar keratosis associated with bilateral pseudodendritic corneal lesions unresponsive to antiviral therapy.

To the Editor:

The combination of menthol and methyl salicylate found in a variety of over-the-counter (OTC) creams in conjunction with a heat source such as a heating pad used for musculoskeletal symptoms can be a dire combination due to increased systemic absorption with associated toxicity and localized effects ranging from contact dermatitis or irritation to burn or necrosis.^1-6 We present a case of localized burn due a combination of topical methyl salicylate and heating pad use. We also discuss 2 commonly encountered side effects in the literature—localized burns and systemic toxicity associated with percutaneous absorption—and provide specific considerations related to the geriatric and pediatric populations.

A 62-year-old woman with a history of eczematous dermatitis and osteoarthritis with pain of the left shoulder presented to the dermatology clinic with painful skin-related changes on the left arm of 1 week’s duration. She was prescribed acetaminophen and ibuprofen. However, she self-medicated the left shoulder pain with 2 OTC products containing topical menthol and/or methyl salicylate in combination with a heating pad and likely fell asleep with this combination therapy applied. She noticed the burn the next morning. On examination, the left arm exhibited a geometric, irregularly shaped, erythematous, scaly plaque with a sharp transverse linear demarcation proximally and numerous erythematous linear scaly plaques oriented in an axial orientation with less-defined borders distally (Figure). The patient was diagnosed with burn secondary to combination of topical methyl salicylate and heating pad use. The patient was advised to discontinue the topical medication and to use caution with the heating pad in the future. She was prescribed pramoxine-hydrocortisone lotion to be applied to the affected area twice daily up to 5 days weekly until resolution. Subsequent evaluations revealed progressive improvement with only mild postinflammatory hyperpigmentation noted at 6 months after the burn.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released statements in 2012 regarding concern for burns related to use of OTC musculoskeletal pain relievers, with 43 cases of burns reported due to methyl salicylate and menthol from 2004 to 2010. Most of the second- and third-degree burns occurred following topical applications of products containing either menthol monotherapy or a combination of methyl salicylate and menthol.^1,2 In 2006, the FDA had already ordered 5 firms to stop compounding topical pain relief formulations containing these ingredients, with concerns that it puts patients at increased risk because the compounded formulations had not received FDA approval.³ Despite package warnings, patients may not be aware of the concerning side effects and risks associated with use of OTC creams, especially in combination with occlusion or heating pad use. Our case highlights the importance of ongoing patient education and physician counseling when encountering patients with arthritis or musculoskeletal pain who may often try various OTC self-treatments for pain relief.⁷

In 2012, the FDA reports stated that the cases of mild to serious burns were associated with methyl salicylate and menthol usage, in some cases 24 hours after first usage. Typically, these effects occur when concentrations are more than either 3% menthol alone or a combination of more than 3% menthol and more than 10% methyl salicylate.^1,2 In our case, the patient had been using 2 different OTC products that may have contained as much as 11% menthol and/or 30% methyl salicylate. Electronic resources are available that disclose safety instructions including not to occlude the site, not to use on wounds, and not to be used in conjunction with a heating pad.^8,9 Skin breakdown and vasodilation are more likely to occur in a setting of heat and occlusion, which allows for more absorption and localized side effects.^4,10 Localized reactions may range from contact dermatitis⁴ to muscle necrosis.⁵

The most noteworthy case of localized destruction described a 62-year-old man who had applied topical methyl salicylate and menthol to the forearms, calves, and thighs, then intermittently used a heating pad for 15 to 20 minutes (total duration).⁵ He subsequently developed erythema and numerous 7.62- to 10.16-cm bullae, which was thought to be consistent with contact dermatitis. Three days later, he was found to have full-thickness cutaneous, fascial, and muscle necrosis in a linear pattern. He was hospitalized for approximately 1 year and treated with extensive debridement and a skin graft. His serum creatinine level increased from 0.7 mg per 100 mL to 2.7 mg per 100 mL (reference range, 0.6–1.2 mg/dL) with evidence of toxic nephrosis and persistent interstitial nephritis, demonstrating the severity of localized destruction that may result when combining these products with direct heat and potential subsequent systemic consequences of this combination.⁵

The systemic absorption of OTC formulations also has been studied. Morra et al¹⁰ studied 12 volunteers (6 women, 6 men) who applied either 5 g of methyl salicylate ointment 12.5% twice daily for 4 days to an area on the thigh (approximately equal to 567 mg salicylate) or trolamine cream 10% twice for 1 day. The participants underwent a break for 7 days and then switched to the alternate treatment. They found that 0.31 to 0.91 mg/L methyl salicylate was detected in the serum 1 hour after applying the ointment consisting of methyl salicylate, and 2 to 6 mg/L methyl salicylate was detected on day 4. Therapeutic serum salicylate levels are 150 to 300 mg/L. They found that approximately 22% of the methyl salicylate also was found in urine samples on day 4. Although these figures may appear small, this study was prompted when a 62-year-old man presented to the emergency department with symptoms of salicylate toxicity and a serum concentration of 518 mg/L from twice-daily use of an OTC formulation containing methyl salicylate over the course of multiple weeks.¹⁰ Additionally, those who have aspirin hypersensitivity should be cautious when using such products due to the risk for reported angioedema.⁴

Providers must exercise extreme caution while caring for geriatric patients, especially if patients are taking warfarin. The combined effects of warfarin and methyl salicylate have previously caused cutaneous purpura, gastrointestinal bleeding, and elevated international normalized ratio values.^4,10 Older individuals also have increased skin fragility, allowing microtraumatic insult to easily develop. This fragility, along with an overall decreased intactness of the skin barrier, may lead to increased skin absorption. Furthermore, the addition of applying any heat source places the geriatric patient at greater risk for adverse events.¹⁰

In considering the limits of age, the pediatric population also has been studied regarding salicylate toxicity. Most commonly, oral ingestion has caused fatalities, as oil of wintergreen has been cited as extremely dangerous for children if swallowed; doses as small as a teaspoon (5 mL: 7000 mg salicylate) have resulted in fatalities.^4,6 Although the consumption of a large amount of a cream- or ointment-based product is unlikely due to the consistency of the medication,⁶ the thought does merit consideration in the inquisitive toddler age group. For a 15-kg toddler, 150 mg/kg of aspirin or 2250 mg of aspirin, is considered the toxic level, which upon conversion to methyl salicylate levels using a 1.4 factor equates to 1607 mg of methyl salicylate to reach toxicity.⁶ If using a product with methyl salicylate 30% composition, 1 g of the product contains 300 mg of methyl salicylate; therefore if the toddler consumed approximately 5.3 g of the product (1607 mg methyl salicylate [toxic level] divided by 300 mg methyl salicylate per 1 g of product), he/she would reach toxic levels.^6,11 To put this into perspective, a 2-oz tube contains 57 g (approximately 10 times the toxic dose) of the product.⁸ Thus, although there is less concern overall for consumption of cream- or ointment-based methyl salicylate, there still is potential for harm if a small child were to ingest such a product containing higher percentages of methyl salicylate.⁶

There also have been reports of pediatric toxicity related to percutaneous absorption, even leading to pediatric fatality.^4,6 In particular, there was a case of a young boy hospitalized with ichthyosis who received escalating doses of percutaneous salicylate, which resulted in toxicity; when therapy was discontinued, he experienced full recovery.¹² In 2007, a 17-year-old adolescent girl died from methyl salicylate toxicity after numerous applications of salicylate-containing products in conjunction with medicated pads.⁷

Although the FDA has drawn attention and encouraged caution with use of OTC topical musculoskeletal pain relievers, the importance of ensuring patients are fully aware of potential burns, permanent skin or muscle damage, and even death if used inappropriately cannot be overstated. The FDA consumer health information website has 2 patient-directed handouts^2,3 that may be useful to post in patient waiting areas to increase overall understanding of the risks associated with OTC products containing methyl salicylate and menthol ingredients. Fortunately, our patient suffered only mild postinflammatory hyperpigmentation without substantial sustained consequences.

To the Editor:

The combination of menthol and methyl salicylate found in a variety of over-the-counter (OTC) creams in conjunction with a heat source such as a heating pad used for musculoskeletal symptoms can be a dire combination due to increased systemic absorption with associated toxicity and localized effects ranging from contact dermatitis or irritation to burn or necrosis.^1-6 We present a case of localized burn due a combination of topical methyl salicylate and heating pad use. We also discuss 2 commonly encountered side effects in the literature—localized burns and systemic toxicity associated with percutaneous absorption—and provide specific considerations related to the geriatric and pediatric populations.

A 62-year-old woman with a history of eczematous dermatitis and osteoarthritis with pain of the left shoulder presented to the dermatology clinic with painful skin-related changes on the left arm of 1 week’s duration. She was prescribed acetaminophen and ibuprofen. However, she self-medicated the left shoulder pain with 2 OTC products containing topical menthol and/or methyl salicylate in combination with a heating pad and likely fell asleep with this combination therapy applied. She noticed the burn the next morning. On examination, the left arm exhibited a geometric, irregularly shaped, erythematous, scaly plaque with a sharp transverse linear demarcation proximally and numerous erythematous linear scaly plaques oriented in an axial orientation with less-defined borders distally (Figure). The patient was diagnosed with burn secondary to combination of topical methyl salicylate and heating pad use. The patient was advised to discontinue the topical medication and to use caution with the heating pad in the future. She was prescribed pramoxine-hydrocortisone lotion to be applied to the affected area twice daily up to 5 days weekly until resolution. Subsequent evaluations revealed progressive improvement with only mild postinflammatory hyperpigmentation noted at 6 months after the burn.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released statements in 2012 regarding concern for burns related to use of OTC musculoskeletal pain relievers, with 43 cases of burns reported due to methyl salicylate and menthol from 2004 to 2010. Most of the second- and third-degree burns occurred following topical applications of products containing either menthol monotherapy or a combination of methyl salicylate and menthol.^1,2 In 2006, the FDA had already ordered 5 firms to stop compounding topical pain relief formulations containing these ingredients, with concerns that it puts patients at increased risk because the compounded formulations had not received FDA approval.³ Despite package warnings, patients may not be aware of the concerning side effects and risks associated with use of OTC creams, especially in combination with occlusion or heating pad use. Our case highlights the importance of ongoing patient education and physician counseling when encountering patients with arthritis or musculoskeletal pain who may often try various OTC self-treatments for pain relief.⁷

In 2012, the FDA reports stated that the cases of mild to serious burns were associated with methyl salicylate and menthol usage, in some cases 24 hours after first usage. Typically, these effects occur when concentrations are more than either 3% menthol alone or a combination of more than 3% menthol and more than 10% methyl salicylate.^1,2 In our case, the patient had been using 2 different OTC products that may have contained as much as 11% menthol and/or 30% methyl salicylate. Electronic resources are available that disclose safety instructions including not to occlude the site, not to use on wounds, and not to be used in conjunction with a heating pad.^8,9 Skin breakdown and vasodilation are more likely to occur in a setting of heat and occlusion, which allows for more absorption and localized side effects.^4,10 Localized reactions may range from contact dermatitis⁴ to muscle necrosis.⁵

The most noteworthy case of localized destruction described a 62-year-old man who had applied topical methyl salicylate and menthol to the forearms, calves, and thighs, then intermittently used a heating pad for 15 to 20 minutes (total duration).⁵ He subsequently developed erythema and numerous 7.62- to 10.16-cm bullae, which was thought to be consistent with contact dermatitis. Three days later, he was found to have full-thickness cutaneous, fascial, and muscle necrosis in a linear pattern. He was hospitalized for approximately 1 year and treated with extensive debridement and a skin graft. His serum creatinine level increased from 0.7 mg per 100 mL to 2.7 mg per 100 mL (reference range, 0.6–1.2 mg/dL) with evidence of toxic nephrosis and persistent interstitial nephritis, demonstrating the severity of localized destruction that may result when combining these products with direct heat and potential subsequent systemic consequences of this combination.⁵

The systemic absorption of OTC formulations also has been studied. Morra et al¹⁰ studied 12 volunteers (6 women, 6 men) who applied either 5 g of methyl salicylate ointment 12.5% twice daily for 4 days to an area on the thigh (approximately equal to 567 mg salicylate) or trolamine cream 10% twice for 1 day. The participants underwent a break for 7 days and then switched to the alternate treatment. They found that 0.31 to 0.91 mg/L methyl salicylate was detected in the serum 1 hour after applying the ointment consisting of methyl salicylate, and 2 to 6 mg/L methyl salicylate was detected on day 4. Therapeutic serum salicylate levels are 150 to 300 mg/L. They found that approximately 22% of the methyl salicylate also was found in urine samples on day 4. Although these figures may appear small, this study was prompted when a 62-year-old man presented to the emergency department with symptoms of salicylate toxicity and a serum concentration of 518 mg/L from twice-daily use of an OTC formulation containing methyl salicylate over the course of multiple weeks.¹⁰ Additionally, those who have aspirin hypersensitivity should be cautious when using such products due to the risk for reported angioedema.⁴

Providers must exercise extreme caution while caring for geriatric patients, especially if patients are taking warfarin. The combined effects of warfarin and methyl salicylate have previously caused cutaneous purpura, gastrointestinal bleeding, and elevated international normalized ratio values.^4,10 Older individuals also have increased skin fragility, allowing microtraumatic insult to easily develop. This fragility, along with an overall decreased intactness of the skin barrier, may lead to increased skin absorption. Furthermore, the addition of applying any heat source places the geriatric patient at greater risk for adverse events.¹⁰

In considering the limits of age, the pediatric population also has been studied regarding salicylate toxicity. Most commonly, oral ingestion has caused fatalities, as oil of wintergreen has been cited as extremely dangerous for children if swallowed; doses as small as a teaspoon (5 mL: 7000 mg salicylate) have resulted in fatalities.^4,6 Although the consumption of a large amount of a cream- or ointment-based product is unlikely due to the consistency of the medication,⁶ the thought does merit consideration in the inquisitive toddler age group. For a 15-kg toddler, 150 mg/kg of aspirin or 2250 mg of aspirin, is considered the toxic level, which upon conversion to methyl salicylate levels using a 1.4 factor equates to 1607 mg of methyl salicylate to reach toxicity.⁶ If using a product with methyl salicylate 30% composition, 1 g of the product contains 300 mg of methyl salicylate; therefore if the toddler consumed approximately 5.3 g of the product (1607 mg methyl salicylate [toxic level] divided by 300 mg methyl salicylate per 1 g of product), he/she would reach toxic levels.^6,11 To put this into perspective, a 2-oz tube contains 57 g (approximately 10 times the toxic dose) of the product.⁸ Thus, although there is less concern overall for consumption of cream- or ointment-based methyl salicylate, there still is potential for harm if a small child were to ingest such a product containing higher percentages of methyl salicylate.⁶

There also have been reports of pediatric toxicity related to percutaneous absorption, even leading to pediatric fatality.^4,6 In particular, there was a case of a young boy hospitalized with ichthyosis who received escalating doses of percutaneous salicylate, which resulted in toxicity; when therapy was discontinued, he experienced full recovery.¹² In 2007, a 17-year-old adolescent girl died from methyl salicylate toxicity after numerous applications of salicylate-containing products in conjunction with medicated pads.⁷

Although the FDA has drawn attention and encouraged caution with use of OTC topical musculoskeletal pain relievers, the importance of ensuring patients are fully aware of potential burns, permanent skin or muscle damage, and even death if used inappropriately cannot be overstated. The FDA consumer health information website has 2 patient-directed handouts^2,3 that may be useful to post in patient waiting areas to increase overall understanding of the risks associated with OTC products containing methyl salicylate and menthol ingredients. Fortunately, our patient suffered only mild postinflammatory hyperpigmentation without substantial sustained consequences.

To the Editor:

The combination of menthol and methyl salicylate found in a variety of over-the-counter (OTC) creams in conjunction with a heat source such as a heating pad used for musculoskeletal symptoms can be a dire combination due to increased systemic absorption with associated toxicity and localized effects ranging from contact dermatitis or irritation to burn or necrosis.^1-6 We present a case of localized burn due a combination of topical methyl salicylate and heating pad use. We also discuss 2 commonly encountered side effects in the literature—localized burns and systemic toxicity associated with percutaneous absorption—and provide specific considerations related to the geriatric and pediatric populations.

A 62-year-old woman with a history of eczematous dermatitis and osteoarthritis with pain of the left shoulder presented to the dermatology clinic with painful skin-related changes on the left arm of 1 week’s duration. She was prescribed acetaminophen and ibuprofen. However, she self-medicated the left shoulder pain with 2 OTC products containing topical menthol and/or methyl salicylate in combination with a heating pad and likely fell asleep with this combination therapy applied. She noticed the burn the next morning. On examination, the left arm exhibited a geometric, irregularly shaped, erythematous, scaly plaque with a sharp transverse linear demarcation proximally and numerous erythematous linear scaly plaques oriented in an axial orientation with less-defined borders distally (Figure). The patient was diagnosed with burn secondary to combination of topical methyl salicylate and heating pad use. The patient was advised to discontinue the topical medication and to use caution with the heating pad in the future. She was prescribed pramoxine-hydrocortisone lotion to be applied to the affected area twice daily up to 5 days weekly until resolution. Subsequent evaluations revealed progressive improvement with only mild postinflammatory hyperpigmentation noted at 6 months after the burn.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released statements in 2012 regarding concern for burns related to use of OTC musculoskeletal pain relievers, with 43 cases of burns reported due to methyl salicylate and menthol from 2004 to 2010. Most of the second- and third-degree burns occurred following topical applications of products containing either menthol monotherapy or a combination of methyl salicylate and menthol.^1,2 In 2006, the FDA had already ordered 5 firms to stop compounding topical pain relief formulations containing these ingredients, with concerns that it puts patients at increased risk because the compounded formulations had not received FDA approval.³ Despite package warnings, patients may not be aware of the concerning side effects and risks associated with use of OTC creams, especially in combination with occlusion or heating pad use. Our case highlights the importance of ongoing patient education and physician counseling when encountering patients with arthritis or musculoskeletal pain who may often try various OTC self-treatments for pain relief.⁷

In 2012, the FDA reports stated that the cases of mild to serious burns were associated with methyl salicylate and menthol usage, in some cases 24 hours after first usage. Typically, these effects occur when concentrations are more than either 3% menthol alone or a combination of more than 3% menthol and more than 10% methyl salicylate.^1,2 In our case, the patient had been using 2 different OTC products that may have contained as much as 11% menthol and/or 30% methyl salicylate. Electronic resources are available that disclose safety instructions including not to occlude the site, not to use on wounds, and not to be used in conjunction with a heating pad.^8,9 Skin breakdown and vasodilation are more likely to occur in a setting of heat and occlusion, which allows for more absorption and localized side effects.^4,10 Localized reactions may range from contact dermatitis⁴ to muscle necrosis.⁵

The most noteworthy case of localized destruction described a 62-year-old man who had applied topical methyl salicylate and menthol to the forearms, calves, and thighs, then intermittently used a heating pad for 15 to 20 minutes (total duration).⁵ He subsequently developed erythema and numerous 7.62- to 10.16-cm bullae, which was thought to be consistent with contact dermatitis. Three days later, he was found to have full-thickness cutaneous, fascial, and muscle necrosis in a linear pattern. He was hospitalized for approximately 1 year and treated with extensive debridement and a skin graft. His serum creatinine level increased from 0.7 mg per 100 mL to 2.7 mg per 100 mL (reference range, 0.6–1.2 mg/dL) with evidence of toxic nephrosis and persistent interstitial nephritis, demonstrating the severity of localized destruction that may result when combining these products with direct heat and potential subsequent systemic consequences of this combination.⁵

The systemic absorption of OTC formulations also has been studied. Morra et al¹⁰ studied 12 volunteers (6 women, 6 men) who applied either 5 g of methyl salicylate ointment 12.5% twice daily for 4 days to an area on the thigh (approximately equal to 567 mg salicylate) or trolamine cream 10% twice for 1 day. The participants underwent a break for 7 days and then switched to the alternate treatment. They found that 0.31 to 0.91 mg/L methyl salicylate was detected in the serum 1 hour after applying the ointment consisting of methyl salicylate, and 2 to 6 mg/L methyl salicylate was detected on day 4. Therapeutic serum salicylate levels are 150 to 300 mg/L. They found that approximately 22% of the methyl salicylate also was found in urine samples on day 4. Although these figures may appear small, this study was prompted when a 62-year-old man presented to the emergency department with symptoms of salicylate toxicity and a serum concentration of 518 mg/L from twice-daily use of an OTC formulation containing methyl salicylate over the course of multiple weeks.¹⁰ Additionally, those who have aspirin hypersensitivity should be cautious when using such products due to the risk for reported angioedema.⁴

Providers must exercise extreme caution while caring for geriatric patients, especially if patients are taking warfarin. The combined effects of warfarin and methyl salicylate have previously caused cutaneous purpura, gastrointestinal bleeding, and elevated international normalized ratio values.^4,10 Older individuals also have increased skin fragility, allowing microtraumatic insult to easily develop. This fragility, along with an overall decreased intactness of the skin barrier, may lead to increased skin absorption. Furthermore, the addition of applying any heat source places the geriatric patient at greater risk for adverse events.¹⁰

In considering the limits of age, the pediatric population also has been studied regarding salicylate toxicity. Most commonly, oral ingestion has caused fatalities, as oil of wintergreen has been cited as extremely dangerous for children if swallowed; doses as small as a teaspoon (5 mL: 7000 mg salicylate) have resulted in fatalities.^4,6 Although the consumption of a large amount of a cream- or ointment-based product is unlikely due to the consistency of the medication,⁶ the thought does merit consideration in the inquisitive toddler age group. For a 15-kg toddler, 150 mg/kg of aspirin or 2250 mg of aspirin, is considered the toxic level, which upon conversion to methyl salicylate levels using a 1.4 factor equates to 1607 mg of methyl salicylate to reach toxicity.⁶ If using a product with methyl salicylate 30% composition, 1 g of the product contains 300 mg of methyl salicylate; therefore if the toddler consumed approximately 5.3 g of the product (1607 mg methyl salicylate [toxic level] divided by 300 mg methyl salicylate per 1 g of product), he/she would reach toxic levels.^6,11 To put this into perspective, a 2-oz tube contains 57 g (approximately 10 times the toxic dose) of the product.⁸ Thus, although there is less concern overall for consumption of cream- or ointment-based methyl salicylate, there still is potential for harm if a small child were to ingest such a product containing higher percentages of methyl salicylate.⁶

There also have been reports of pediatric toxicity related to percutaneous absorption, even leading to pediatric fatality.^4,6 In particular, there was a case of a young boy hospitalized with ichthyosis who received escalating doses of percutaneous salicylate, which resulted in toxicity; when therapy was discontinued, he experienced full recovery.¹² In 2007, a 17-year-old adolescent girl died from methyl salicylate toxicity after numerous applications of salicylate-containing products in conjunction with medicated pads.⁷

Although the FDA has drawn attention and encouraged caution with use of OTC topical musculoskeletal pain relievers, the importance of ensuring patients are fully aware of potential burns, permanent skin or muscle damage, and even death if used inappropriately cannot be overstated. The FDA consumer health information website has 2 patient-directed handouts^2,3 that may be useful to post in patient waiting areas to increase overall understanding of the risks associated with OTC products containing methyl salicylate and menthol ingredients. Fortunately, our patient suffered only mild postinflammatory hyperpigmentation without substantial sustained consequences.

To the Editor:

Primary mucinous carcinoma (PMC) is an exceedingly rare adnexal tumor with an incidence of 0.07 cases per million individuals.^1,2 First described by Lennox et al³ in 1952, this entity often presents as slow-growing, solitary nodules that often are soft on palpation but may have an indurated quality and range in color from reddish blue to flesh colored to white.⁴ Primary mucinous carcinoma most commonly is found on the eyelid (38%) but may affect other sites on the face (20.3%), scalp (16%), and axilla (10%).⁵ Historically, it has been thought to be more common among men; however, a 2005 large case series by Kazakov et al⁵ found that women were twice as likely to be affected. Primary mucinous carcinoma most frequently is diagnosed in the fifth through seventh decades of life, with a median age at onset of 63 years.^6,7 Because of its rarity, PMC is most frequently confused clinically with basal cell carcinoma, keratoacanthoma, apocrine hidrocystoma, epidermoid cyst, Kaposi sarcoma, neuroma, lacrimal sac tumor, squamous cell carcinoma, granulomatous tumors, and metastatic adenocarcinoma.^1,8-10

Primary mucinous carcinoma is thought to be derived from sweat glands, and select features such as decapitation secretion are more suggestive of apocrine than eccrine differentiation.^5,8 On histopathology, PMC classically is described as nests of epithelial cells floating in lakes of extracellular mucin, primarily in the dermis and subcutis. The nests are composed of basaloid cells in solid to cribriform arrangements, usually with a low mitotic count and little nuclear atypia. These nests are suspended within periodic acid–Schiff positive mucinous pools partitioned by delicate fibrous septa. The mucin produced by PMC is sialomucin, and as such it is hyaluronidase resistant and sialidase labile.⁶ At least 1 report has been made of the presence of psammoma bodies in PMC.¹¹

The neoplasm is characterized by an indolent course with frequent recurrence but rare metastasis.^5,12 Treatment is primarily surgical, with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) offering improved tissue conservation and reduced recurrence rates.¹² The diagnostic challenge lies in distinguishing PMC from a variety of metastatic mucinous internal malignancies that portend a notably greater morbidity and mortality to the patient. We describe a case of PMC, discuss the differentiation of PMC from metastatic mucinous carcinoma, and review the literature regarding treatment of this rare neoplasm.

A 65-year-old white woman was referred to our tertiary-care dermatologic surgery clinic for treatment of an incompletely excised mucinous carcinoma of the right lateral canthus (Figure 1). The clinically evident scar measured 0.5×0.5 cm. Although difficult to appreciate in Figure 1, a slight textural change of the surrounding skin, including the upper and lower eyelid, was apparent. Prior to her arrival to our clinic, the referring physician had completed a thorough review of systems and physical examination, which did not suggest an underlying malignancy. Computed tomography of the head, neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis revealed a mass in the thyroid that was removed and found to be benign. The patient’s cutaneous lesion was therefore considered to be a PMC of the skin.

Given the prior incomplete excision of the lesion and its periocular location, we treated the patient with MMS. After 6 surgical stages, we continued to see evidence of the neoplasm as it tracked medially along the orbicularis oculi muscle (Figure 2). Due to the patient’s physical and emotional exhaustion at this point, we discontinued MMS and referred her to a colleague in plastic surgery for further excision of the remaining focus of positivity as well as repair. The final Mohs defect measured 4.2×4.0 cm (Figure 3). Approximately 2.3×1.0 cm of tissue in the area of remaining tumor was excised by plastic surgery, and the defect was repaired with a cervicofacial advancement flap closure of the right cheek and lower eyelid and full-thickness skin graft of the left upper eyelid. Histopathologic investigation found the additional tissue resected to be free of residual tumor.

To diagnose a patient with PMC, one must first rule out cutaneous metastasis of various internal malignancies that may appear similar on histopathology. A full clinical investigation consisting of a thorough history, physical examination, and appropriate radiographic imaging is required. Cutaneous metastases most commonly arise from the breast or gastrointestinal tract (GIT) but also can originate from the prostate, lungs, ovaries, pancreas, and kidneys.⁵ Histologically, PMC may be identical to metastatic adenocarcinoma.¹³ Location on the body may be a clue to a lesion’s origin, as metastases from a mucinous adenocarcinoma of the breast typically occur on the chest, breast, or axilla,⁵ whereas PMC primarily is found on the head and neck.

Certain histopathologic features may be suggestive of either a primary or metastatic etiology. Lesions arising in the skin may reveal an in situ component representing ductal hyperplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia, or ductal carcinoma in situ. Identification of an in situ component defines a cutaneous primary neoplasm, but its absence does not exclude PMC.⁵ Additionally, metastatic lesions from the GIT typically have greater pleomorphism and “dirty” necrosis defined as eosinophilic foci containing nuclear debris.⁵

The expression pattern of cytokeratins (CKs) also can be suggestive. Primary mucinous carcinoma and metastatic breast adenocarcinoma are both CK7⁺ and CK20⁻. By contrast, mucinous adenocarcinoma of the GIT stains CK20⁺ and CK7⁻.¹⁴ Another marker that stains PMC is CK5 and CK6, though infrequently present. Levy et al¹⁵ reported positive staining for CK5 and CK6 in only 1 of 5 PMC cases. Positive staining for CK5 and CK6 has not been reported in any metastatic mucinous carcinoma.

The role of p63 immunostaining in the setting of mucinous carcinoma is controversial.^16-18 Some practi-tioners have reported using p63 immunostaining to assist in establishing the diagnosis of PMC but only after performing a clinical workup to search for any primary sites of mucinous carcinoma in other organs.¹¹ Other studies, however, have found select metastatic lesions from the breast^17,18 and GIT¹⁸ to stain positively with p63. It is important to remember that these clinical and pathologic features are only suggestive of the primary etiology and are not replacement for a full clinical investigation.

Primary mucinous carcinoma is considered an indolent tumor with the majority of patient morbidity attributable to local recurrence and regional metastasis. Although uncommon, regional and distant metastasis rates have been reported to be 11% and 3%, respectively.¹⁹ Direct lymphatic invasion has been reported and indicates a more aggressive tumor with shorter recurrence-free intervals and predicts nodal metastases. Paradela et al²⁰ recommended the use of D2-40, a monoclonal antibody and specific marker for lymphatic endothelium, to detect lymphatic invasion, particularly in node-negative primary tumors.

In one case of PMC on the jaw of a 39-year-old Japanese man, no recurrence or metastases were discovered until the 11th year of follow-up. At that time, he was found to have lung and bone metastases and died after 3 years.²¹ Other investigators report death occurring 4 to 24 months following diagnosis of distant metastases.^7,22 Direct extension of the tumor into skeletal muscle, periosteum, bone, and dura also has been documented.⁷

Treatment principally is surgical, with PMC known to be resistant to both chemotherapy and radiation therapy.^19,22 The recommended margins for simple excision range from 1 to 2 cm, but this method of treatment yields recurrence rates upward of 30% to 40%, especially for lesions located on the eyelid.^12,13 First utilized in PMC of the eyelid to conserve tissue, MMS is rapidly becoming the treatment of choice because of its notably improved recurrence rate. A case series of 4 PMCs of the eyelid treated via MMS or frozen section control found the recurrence rate to be 7%.²³ Another report of 2 cases of PMC treated by MMS reported no recurrence after 42 and 26 months.¹³ Ortiz et al⁷ reported an additional case of a patient treated by MMS that was recurrence free for 30 months at the time of publication. Further investigation is required to definitively recommend MMS on the basis of improved recurrence rate but should now be considered standard of care in recurrent, sizeable, or eyelid PMC.

Despite its ascension as treatment of choice in many cases of PMC, MMS is not without its risk of metastasis and recurrence. Tam et al²⁴ reported a case of PMC with multiple recurrences and metastases following 3 simple excisions and 2 excisions via MMS. Although the lesion’s previously recurrent nature increased the likelihood of failure of MMS, this case demonstrates that all patients should be followed periodically after the treatment of PMC.

We presented a case of PMC in which standard surgical margins would have been insufficient to clear the lesion. Mohs micrographic surgery was used to remove the majority of the tumor. As is common in PMC, the lesion was indolent and periocular in location. It also was incompletely excised due to notable subclinical extension, which is common for PMC. The distinction of PMC from metastatic mucinous carcinoma is paramount but sometimes difficult. Randomized controlled trials are lacking with regards to preferred method of treatment, but MMS has shown benefit and should be considered for recurrent lesions and lesions in cosmetically sensitive areas.

To the Editor:

Primary mucinous carcinoma (PMC) is an exceedingly rare adnexal tumor with an incidence of 0.07 cases per million individuals.^1,2 First described by Lennox et al³ in 1952, this entity often presents as slow-growing, solitary nodules that often are soft on palpation but may have an indurated quality and range in color from reddish blue to flesh colored to white.⁴ Primary mucinous carcinoma most commonly is found on the eyelid (38%) but may affect other sites on the face (20.3%), scalp (16%), and axilla (10%).⁵ Historically, it has been thought to be more common among men; however, a 2005 large case series by Kazakov et al⁵ found that women were twice as likely to be affected. Primary mucinous carcinoma most frequently is diagnosed in the fifth through seventh decades of life, with a median age at onset of 63 years.^6,7 Because of its rarity, PMC is most frequently confused clinically with basal cell carcinoma, keratoacanthoma, apocrine hidrocystoma, epidermoid cyst, Kaposi sarcoma, neuroma, lacrimal sac tumor, squamous cell carcinoma, granulomatous tumors, and metastatic adenocarcinoma.^1,8-10

Primary mucinous carcinoma is thought to be derived from sweat glands, and select features such as decapitation secretion are more suggestive of apocrine than eccrine differentiation.^5,8 On histopathology, PMC classically is described as nests of epithelial cells floating in lakes of extracellular mucin, primarily in the dermis and subcutis. The nests are composed of basaloid cells in solid to cribriform arrangements, usually with a low mitotic count and little nuclear atypia. These nests are suspended within periodic acid–Schiff positive mucinous pools partitioned by delicate fibrous septa. The mucin produced by PMC is sialomucin, and as such it is hyaluronidase resistant and sialidase labile.⁶ At least 1 report has been made of the presence of psammoma bodies in PMC.¹¹

The neoplasm is characterized by an indolent course with frequent recurrence but rare metastasis.^5,12 Treatment is primarily surgical, with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) offering improved tissue conservation and reduced recurrence rates.¹² The diagnostic challenge lies in distinguishing PMC from a variety of metastatic mucinous internal malignancies that portend a notably greater morbidity and mortality to the patient. We describe a case of PMC, discuss the differentiation of PMC from metastatic mucinous carcinoma, and review the literature regarding treatment of this rare neoplasm.

A 65-year-old white woman was referred to our tertiary-care dermatologic surgery clinic for treatment of an incompletely excised mucinous carcinoma of the right lateral canthus (Figure 1). The clinically evident scar measured 0.5×0.5 cm. Although difficult to appreciate in Figure 1, a slight textural change of the surrounding skin, including the upper and lower eyelid, was apparent. Prior to her arrival to our clinic, the referring physician had completed a thorough review of systems and physical examination, which did not suggest an underlying malignancy. Computed tomography of the head, neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis revealed a mass in the thyroid that was removed and found to be benign. The patient’s cutaneous lesion was therefore considered to be a PMC of the skin.

Given the prior incomplete excision of the lesion and its periocular location, we treated the patient with MMS. After 6 surgical stages, we continued to see evidence of the neoplasm as it tracked medially along the orbicularis oculi muscle (Figure 2). Due to the patient’s physical and emotional exhaustion at this point, we discontinued MMS and referred her to a colleague in plastic surgery for further excision of the remaining focus of positivity as well as repair. The final Mohs defect measured 4.2×4.0 cm (Figure 3). Approximately 2.3×1.0 cm of tissue in the area of remaining tumor was excised by plastic surgery, and the defect was repaired with a cervicofacial advancement flap closure of the right cheek and lower eyelid and full-thickness skin graft of the left upper eyelid. Histopathologic investigation found the additional tissue resected to be free of residual tumor.

To diagnose a patient with PMC, one must first rule out cutaneous metastasis of various internal malignancies that may appear similar on histopathology. A full clinical investigation consisting of a thorough history, physical examination, and appropriate radiographic imaging is required. Cutaneous metastases most commonly arise from the breast or gastrointestinal tract (GIT) but also can originate from the prostate, lungs, ovaries, pancreas, and kidneys.⁵ Histologically, PMC may be identical to metastatic adenocarcinoma.¹³ Location on the body may be a clue to a lesion’s origin, as metastases from a mucinous adenocarcinoma of the breast typically occur on the chest, breast, or axilla,⁵ whereas PMC primarily is found on the head and neck.

Certain histopathologic features may be suggestive of either a primary or metastatic etiology. Lesions arising in the skin may reveal an in situ component representing ductal hyperplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia, or ductal carcinoma in situ. Identification of an in situ component defines a cutaneous primary neoplasm, but its absence does not exclude PMC.⁵ Additionally, metastatic lesions from the GIT typically have greater pleomorphism and “dirty” necrosis defined as eosinophilic foci containing nuclear debris.⁵

The expression pattern of cytokeratins (CKs) also can be suggestive. Primary mucinous carcinoma and metastatic breast adenocarcinoma are both CK7⁺ and CK20⁻. By contrast, mucinous adenocarcinoma of the GIT stains CK20⁺ and CK7⁻.¹⁴ Another marker that stains PMC is CK5 and CK6, though infrequently present. Levy et al¹⁵ reported positive staining for CK5 and CK6 in only 1 of 5 PMC cases. Positive staining for CK5 and CK6 has not been reported in any metastatic mucinous carcinoma.

The role of p63 immunostaining in the setting of mucinous carcinoma is controversial.^16-18 Some practi-tioners have reported using p63 immunostaining to assist in establishing the diagnosis of PMC but only after performing a clinical workup to search for any primary sites of mucinous carcinoma in other organs.¹¹ Other studies, however, have found select metastatic lesions from the breast^17,18 and GIT¹⁸ to stain positively with p63. It is important to remember that these clinical and pathologic features are only suggestive of the primary etiology and are not replacement for a full clinical investigation.

Primary mucinous carcinoma is considered an indolent tumor with the majority of patient morbidity attributable to local recurrence and regional metastasis. Although uncommon, regional and distant metastasis rates have been reported to be 11% and 3%, respectively.¹⁹ Direct lymphatic invasion has been reported and indicates a more aggressive tumor with shorter recurrence-free intervals and predicts nodal metastases. Paradela et al²⁰ recommended the use of D2-40, a monoclonal antibody and specific marker for lymphatic endothelium, to detect lymphatic invasion, particularly in node-negative primary tumors.

In one case of PMC on the jaw of a 39-year-old Japanese man, no recurrence or metastases were discovered until the 11th year of follow-up. At that time, he was found to have lung and bone metastases and died after 3 years.²¹ Other investigators report death occurring 4 to 24 months following diagnosis of distant metastases.^7,22 Direct extension of the tumor into skeletal muscle, periosteum, bone, and dura also has been documented.⁷

Treatment principally is surgical, with PMC known to be resistant to both chemotherapy and radiation therapy.^19,22 The recommended margins for simple excision range from 1 to 2 cm, but this method of treatment yields recurrence rates upward of 30% to 40%, especially for lesions located on the eyelid.^12,13 First utilized in PMC of the eyelid to conserve tissue, MMS is rapidly becoming the treatment of choice because of its notably improved recurrence rate. A case series of 4 PMCs of the eyelid treated via MMS or frozen section control found the recurrence rate to be 7%.²³ Another report of 2 cases of PMC treated by MMS reported no recurrence after 42 and 26 months.¹³ Ortiz et al⁷ reported an additional case of a patient treated by MMS that was recurrence free for 30 months at the time of publication. Further investigation is required to definitively recommend MMS on the basis of improved recurrence rate but should now be considered standard of care in recurrent, sizeable, or eyelid PMC.

Despite its ascension as treatment of choice in many cases of PMC, MMS is not without its risk of metastasis and recurrence. Tam et al²⁴ reported a case of PMC with multiple recurrences and metastases following 3 simple excisions and 2 excisions via MMS. Although the lesion’s previously recurrent nature increased the likelihood of failure of MMS, this case demonstrates that all patients should be followed periodically after the treatment of PMC.

We presented a case of PMC in which standard surgical margins would have been insufficient to clear the lesion. Mohs micrographic surgery was used to remove the majority of the tumor. As is common in PMC, the lesion was indolent and periocular in location. It also was incompletely excised due to notable subclinical extension, which is common for PMC. The distinction of PMC from metastatic mucinous carcinoma is paramount but sometimes difficult. Randomized controlled trials are lacking with regards to preferred method of treatment, but MMS has shown benefit and should be considered for recurrent lesions and lesions in cosmetically sensitive areas.

To the Editor:

Primary mucinous carcinoma (PMC) is an exceedingly rare adnexal tumor with an incidence of 0.07 cases per million individuals.^1,2 First described by Lennox et al³ in 1952, this entity often presents as slow-growing, solitary nodules that often are soft on palpation but may have an indurated quality and range in color from reddish blue to flesh colored to white.⁴ Primary mucinous carcinoma most commonly is found on the eyelid (38%) but may affect other sites on the face (20.3%), scalp (16%), and axilla (10%).⁵ Historically, it has been thought to be more common among men; however, a 2005 large case series by Kazakov et al⁵ found that women were twice as likely to be affected. Primary mucinous carcinoma most frequently is diagnosed in the fifth through seventh decades of life, with a median age at onset of 63 years.^6,7 Because of its rarity, PMC is most frequently confused clinically with basal cell carcinoma, keratoacanthoma, apocrine hidrocystoma, epidermoid cyst, Kaposi sarcoma, neuroma, lacrimal sac tumor, squamous cell carcinoma, granulomatous tumors, and metastatic adenocarcinoma.^1,8-10

Primary mucinous carcinoma is thought to be derived from sweat glands, and select features such as decapitation secretion are more suggestive of apocrine than eccrine differentiation.^5,8 On histopathology, PMC classically is described as nests of epithelial cells floating in lakes of extracellular mucin, primarily in the dermis and subcutis. The nests are composed of basaloid cells in solid to cribriform arrangements, usually with a low mitotic count and little nuclear atypia. These nests are suspended within periodic acid–Schiff positive mucinous pools partitioned by delicate fibrous septa. The mucin produced by PMC is sialomucin, and as such it is hyaluronidase resistant and sialidase labile.⁶ At least 1 report has been made of the presence of psammoma bodies in PMC.¹¹

The neoplasm is characterized by an indolent course with frequent recurrence but rare metastasis.^5,12 Treatment is primarily surgical, with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) offering improved tissue conservation and reduced recurrence rates.¹² The diagnostic challenge lies in distinguishing PMC from a variety of metastatic mucinous internal malignancies that portend a notably greater morbidity and mortality to the patient. We describe a case of PMC, discuss the differentiation of PMC from metastatic mucinous carcinoma, and review the literature regarding treatment of this rare neoplasm.

A 65-year-old white woman was referred to our tertiary-care dermatologic surgery clinic for treatment of an incompletely excised mucinous carcinoma of the right lateral canthus (Figure 1). The clinically evident scar measured 0.5×0.5 cm. Although difficult to appreciate in Figure 1, a slight textural change of the surrounding skin, including the upper and lower eyelid, was apparent. Prior to her arrival to our clinic, the referring physician had completed a thorough review of systems and physical examination, which did not suggest an underlying malignancy. Computed tomography of the head, neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis revealed a mass in the thyroid that was removed and found to be benign. The patient’s cutaneous lesion was therefore considered to be a PMC of the skin.

Given the prior incomplete excision of the lesion and its periocular location, we treated the patient with MMS. After 6 surgical stages, we continued to see evidence of the neoplasm as it tracked medially along the orbicularis oculi muscle (Figure 2). Due to the patient’s physical and emotional exhaustion at this point, we discontinued MMS and referred her to a colleague in plastic surgery for further excision of the remaining focus of positivity as well as repair. The final Mohs defect measured 4.2×4.0 cm (Figure 3). Approximately 2.3×1.0 cm of tissue in the area of remaining tumor was excised by plastic surgery, and the defect was repaired with a cervicofacial advancement flap closure of the right cheek and lower eyelid and full-thickness skin graft of the left upper eyelid. Histopathologic investigation found the additional tissue resected to be free of residual tumor.

To diagnose a patient with PMC, one must first rule out cutaneous metastasis of various internal malignancies that may appear similar on histopathology. A full clinical investigation consisting of a thorough history, physical examination, and appropriate radiographic imaging is required. Cutaneous metastases most commonly arise from the breast or gastrointestinal tract (GIT) but also can originate from the prostate, lungs, ovaries, pancreas, and kidneys.⁵ Histologically, PMC may be identical to metastatic adenocarcinoma.¹³ Location on the body may be a clue to a lesion’s origin, as metastases from a mucinous adenocarcinoma of the breast typically occur on the chest, breast, or axilla,⁵ whereas PMC primarily is found on the head and neck.

Certain histopathologic features may be suggestive of either a primary or metastatic etiology. Lesions arising in the skin may reveal an in situ component representing ductal hyperplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia, or ductal carcinoma in situ. Identification of an in situ component defines a cutaneous primary neoplasm, but its absence does not exclude PMC.⁵ Additionally, metastatic lesions from the GIT typically have greater pleomorphism and “dirty” necrosis defined as eosinophilic foci containing nuclear debris.⁵

The expression pattern of cytokeratins (CKs) also can be suggestive. Primary mucinous carcinoma and metastatic breast adenocarcinoma are both CK7⁺ and CK20⁻. By contrast, mucinous adenocarcinoma of the GIT stains CK20⁺ and CK7⁻.¹⁴ Another marker that stains PMC is CK5 and CK6, though infrequently present. Levy et al¹⁵ reported positive staining for CK5 and CK6 in only 1 of 5 PMC cases. Positive staining for CK5 and CK6 has not been reported in any metastatic mucinous carcinoma.

The role of p63 immunostaining in the setting of mucinous carcinoma is controversial.^16-18 Some practi-tioners have reported using p63 immunostaining to assist in establishing the diagnosis of PMC but only after performing a clinical workup to search for any primary sites of mucinous carcinoma in other organs.¹¹ Other studies, however, have found select metastatic lesions from the breast^17,18 and GIT¹⁸ to stain positively with p63. It is important to remember that these clinical and pathologic features are only suggestive of the primary etiology and are not replacement for a full clinical investigation.

Primary mucinous carcinoma is considered an indolent tumor with the majority of patient morbidity attributable to local recurrence and regional metastasis. Although uncommon, regional and distant metastasis rates have been reported to be 11% and 3%, respectively.¹⁹ Direct lymphatic invasion has been reported and indicates a more aggressive tumor with shorter recurrence-free intervals and predicts nodal metastases. Paradela et al²⁰ recommended the use of D2-40, a monoclonal antibody and specific marker for lymphatic endothelium, to detect lymphatic invasion, particularly in node-negative primary tumors.

In one case of PMC on the jaw of a 39-year-old Japanese man, no recurrence or metastases were discovered until the 11th year of follow-up. At that time, he was found to have lung and bone metastases and died after 3 years.²¹ Other investigators report death occurring 4 to 24 months following diagnosis of distant metastases.^7,22 Direct extension of the tumor into skeletal muscle, periosteum, bone, and dura also has been documented.⁷

Treatment principally is surgical, with PMC known to be resistant to both chemotherapy and radiation therapy.^19,22 The recommended margins for simple excision range from 1 to 2 cm, but this method of treatment yields recurrence rates upward of 30% to 40%, especially for lesions located on the eyelid.^12,13 First utilized in PMC of the eyelid to conserve tissue, MMS is rapidly becoming the treatment of choice because of its notably improved recurrence rate. A case series of 4 PMCs of the eyelid treated via MMS or frozen section control found the recurrence rate to be 7%.²³ Another report of 2 cases of PMC treated by MMS reported no recurrence after 42 and 26 months.¹³ Ortiz et al⁷ reported an additional case of a patient treated by MMS that was recurrence free for 30 months at the time of publication. Further investigation is required to definitively recommend MMS on the basis of improved recurrence rate but should now be considered standard of care in recurrent, sizeable, or eyelid PMC.

Despite its ascension as treatment of choice in many cases of PMC, MMS is not without its risk of metastasis and recurrence. Tam et al²⁴ reported a case of PMC with multiple recurrences and metastases following 3 simple excisions and 2 excisions via MMS. Although the lesion’s previously recurrent nature increased the likelihood of failure of MMS, this case demonstrates that all patients should be followed periodically after the treatment of PMC.

We presented a case of PMC in which standard surgical margins would have been insufficient to clear the lesion. Mohs micrographic surgery was used to remove the majority of the tumor. As is common in PMC, the lesion was indolent and periocular in location. It also was incompletely excised due to notable subclinical extension, which is common for PMC. The distinction of PMC from metastatic mucinous carcinoma is paramount but sometimes difficult. Randomized controlled trials are lacking with regards to preferred method of treatment, but MMS has shown benefit and should be considered for recurrent lesions and lesions in cosmetically sensitive areas.

To the Editor:

Acrodermatitis enteropathica (AE) is an inherited defect in zinc absorption that leads to hypozincemia. Its clinical presentation can vary based on serum zinc level and ranges from periorificial erosive dermatitis to psoriasiform dermatitis.¹ Recognition of the cutaneous manifestations of zinc deficiency can lead to early intervention with zinc supplementation and prevention of long-term morbidity and even mortality. In our case, the coexistence of a bullous acral dermatosis with the additional feature of extensor digital dermatitis with fissuring suggests a diagnosis of AE and can alert the astute clinician to the need for testing of serum zinc levels and/or treatment with zinc supplementation. Causes of acquired zinc deficiency that have been reported in the literature include eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, Crohn disease, food allergy, intestinal parasitic infestations, and an inborn error of metabolism known as nonketotic hyperglycemia (Table).^2-4

RELATED ARTICLE: Acquired Acrodermatitis Enteropathica Secondary to Alcoholism

A 42-year-old woman with a medical history of rheumatoid arthritis and short bowel syndrome due to multiple small bowel obstructions with subsequent bowel resections who was on chronic total parenteral nutrition (TPN) presented with bullae on the hands, shins, and feet. The patient initially noticed small erythematous macules on the hands and feet months prior to presentation. Three weeks prior to presentation, bullae started to form on the hands, mostly between the web spaces; dorsal aspects of the feet; and anterior aspects of the shins. The patient denied any oral ulcers. One day prior to presentation the patient was seen at an outside hospital and was started on prednisone 5 mg daily, oral clindamycin, mupirocin ointment, and nystatin-triamcinolone cream. These medications failed to improve her condition. On review of systems, the patient denied any fever, chills, eye pain, or dysuria.

Upon initial presentation the patient appeared weak and fatigued, though vital signs were normal. Physical examination revealed multiple flaccid bullae in the web spaces of the hands and shallow erosions with hemorrhagic crusts on the bilateral wrists. She also had violaceous patches in the extensor creases of the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and distal interphalangeal joints, which were strikingly symmetric (Figure 1). Prominent flaccid bullae and shallow erosions with hemorrhagic crusts also were present on the bilateral shins and dorsal aspects of the feet (Figure 2). No oral ulcers were present. A punch biopsy from the dorsal aspect of the left foot revealed psoriasiform hyperplasia of the epidermis with prominent ballooning degeneration and hyperkeratosis/parakeratosis (Figure 3); a periodic acid–Schiff stain was negative for fungal organisms.

Given the biopsy results and clinical presentation, a nutritional deficiency was suspected and serum levels of zinc, vitamin B₁, vitamin B₂, and vitamin B₃ were assessed. Vitamins B₁, B₂, and B₃ all were within reference range, but the patient’s serum zinc level was found to be low at 11 μg/mL (reference range, 55–150 μg/mL). The alkaline phosphatase level also was measured to be low at 22 U/L (reference range, 31–103 U/L). Additionally, a hepatitis panel was drawn and glucagon levels were checked, which were found to be within reference range. These findings were consistent with a diagnosis of acquired AE. Prednisone and clindamycin were stopped and the patient was started on zinc supplementation in her TPN therapy. Mupirocin ointment was continued on the existing bullae. Upon discharge 10 days later, there were no new bullae and the existing bullae had sloughed off, revealing healthy skin underneath.

Zinc is an essential trace element and can be found in high concentration in foods such as shellfish, green vegetables, legumes, nuts, and whole grains.⁶ The majority of zinc is absorbed in the jejunum; as such, many cases of acquired zinc deficiency leading to AE are dueto disorders that affect the small intestine.² Conditions that may lead to poor gastrointestinal zinc absorption include alcoholism, eating disorders, TPN, burns, surgery, and malignancies.^2,7

Diagnosis typically is made based on characteristic clinical features, biopsy results, and a measurement of the serum zinc concentration. Although a low serum zinc level supports the diagnosis, serum zinc concentration is not a reliable indicator of body zinc stores and a normal serum zinc concentration does not rule out AE. The gold standard for diagnosis is the resolution of lesions after zinc supplementation.¹ Notably, because the production of alkaline phosphatase is dependent on zinc, levels of this enzyme also may be low in cases of AE,⁶ as in our patient.

The clinical manifestations of AE can vary greatly; patients may initially present with eczematous pink scaly plaques, which may subsequently become vesicular, bullous, pustular, or desquamative. The lesions may develop over the arms and legs as well as the anogenital and periorificial areas.⁵ Other notable manifestations that may present early in the course of AE include angular cheilitis followed by paronychia. In patients who are not promptly treated, long-term zinc deficiency may lead to growth delay, mental slowing, poor wound healing, anemia, and anorexia.⁵ Of note, deficiencies of branched-chain amino acids and essential fatty acids may appear clinically similar to AE.²

Zinc replacement is the treatment of choice for patients with AE due to dietary deficiency, and replacement therapy should begin with 0.5 to 1 mg/kg daily of elemental zinc.⁵ Response to acquired AE with zinc supplementation often is rapid. Lesions tend to resolve within days to weeks depending on the degree of deficiency.²

Although AE is an uncommon dermatosis in the United States, it is an important diagnosis to make because its clinical features are fairly specific and early zinc supplementation allows for full resolution of the disease without permanent sequelae. The diagnosis of AE should be strongly considered when features of an acral bullous dermatosis are combined with a fissured dermatitis of extensor joints of the hands or elbows. It is particularly important to recognize that alcoholics, burn victims, postsurgical patients, and those with malignancies and eating disorders are at an increased risk for developing this nutritional deficiency.

To the Editor:

Acrodermatitis enteropathica (AE) is an inherited defect in zinc absorption that leads to hypozincemia. Its clinical presentation can vary based on serum zinc level and ranges from periorificial erosive dermatitis to psoriasiform dermatitis.¹ Recognition of the cutaneous manifestations of zinc deficiency can lead to early intervention with zinc supplementation and prevention of long-term morbidity and even mortality. In our case, the coexistence of a bullous acral dermatosis with the additional feature of extensor digital dermatitis with fissuring suggests a diagnosis of AE and can alert the astute clinician to the need for testing of serum zinc levels and/or treatment with zinc supplementation. Causes of acquired zinc deficiency that have been reported in the literature include eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, Crohn disease, food allergy, intestinal parasitic infestations, and an inborn error of metabolism known as nonketotic hyperglycemia (Table).^2-4

RELATED ARTICLE: Acquired Acrodermatitis Enteropathica Secondary to Alcoholism

A 42-year-old woman with a medical history of rheumatoid arthritis and short bowel syndrome due to multiple small bowel obstructions with subsequent bowel resections who was on chronic total parenteral nutrition (TPN) presented with bullae on the hands, shins, and feet. The patient initially noticed small erythematous macules on the hands and feet months prior to presentation. Three weeks prior to presentation, bullae started to form on the hands, mostly between the web spaces; dorsal aspects of the feet; and anterior aspects of the shins. The patient denied any oral ulcers. One day prior to presentation the patient was seen at an outside hospital and was started on prednisone 5 mg daily, oral clindamycin, mupirocin ointment, and nystatin-triamcinolone cream. These medications failed to improve her condition. On review of systems, the patient denied any fever, chills, eye pain, or dysuria.

Upon initial presentation the patient appeared weak and fatigued, though vital signs were normal. Physical examination revealed multiple flaccid bullae in the web spaces of the hands and shallow erosions with hemorrhagic crusts on the bilateral wrists. She also had violaceous patches in the extensor creases of the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and distal interphalangeal joints, which were strikingly symmetric (Figure 1). Prominent flaccid bullae and shallow erosions with hemorrhagic crusts also were present on the bilateral shins and dorsal aspects of the feet (Figure 2). No oral ulcers were present. A punch biopsy from the dorsal aspect of the left foot revealed psoriasiform hyperplasia of the epidermis with prominent ballooning degeneration and hyperkeratosis/parakeratosis (Figure 3); a periodic acid–Schiff stain was negative for fungal organisms.

Given the biopsy results and clinical presentation, a nutritional deficiency was suspected and serum levels of zinc, vitamin B₁, vitamin B₂, and vitamin B₃ were assessed. Vitamins B₁, B₂, and B₃ all were within reference range, but the patient’s serum zinc level was found to be low at 11 μg/mL (reference range, 55–150 μg/mL). The alkaline phosphatase level also was measured to be low at 22 U/L (reference range, 31–103 U/L). Additionally, a hepatitis panel was drawn and glucagon levels were checked, which were found to be within reference range. These findings were consistent with a diagnosis of acquired AE. Prednisone and clindamycin were stopped and the patient was started on zinc supplementation in her TPN therapy. Mupirocin ointment was continued on the existing bullae. Upon discharge 10 days later, there were no new bullae and the existing bullae had sloughed off, revealing healthy skin underneath.

Zinc is an essential trace element and can be found in high concentration in foods such as shellfish, green vegetables, legumes, nuts, and whole grains.⁶ The majority of zinc is absorbed in the jejunum; as such, many cases of acquired zinc deficiency leading to AE are dueto disorders that affect the small intestine.² Conditions that may lead to poor gastrointestinal zinc absorption include alcoholism, eating disorders, TPN, burns, surgery, and malignancies.^2,7

Diagnosis typically is made based on characteristic clinical features, biopsy results, and a measurement of the serum zinc concentration. Although a low serum zinc level supports the diagnosis, serum zinc concentration is not a reliable indicator of body zinc stores and a normal serum zinc concentration does not rule out AE. The gold standard for diagnosis is the resolution of lesions after zinc supplementation.¹ Notably, because the production of alkaline phosphatase is dependent on zinc, levels of this enzyme also may be low in cases of AE,⁶ as in our patient.

The clinical manifestations of AE can vary greatly; patients may initially present with eczematous pink scaly plaques, which may subsequently become vesicular, bullous, pustular, or desquamative. The lesions may develop over the arms and legs as well as the anogenital and periorificial areas.⁵ Other notable manifestations that may present early in the course of AE include angular cheilitis followed by paronychia. In patients who are not promptly treated, long-term zinc deficiency may lead to growth delay, mental slowing, poor wound healing, anemia, and anorexia.⁵ Of note, deficiencies of branched-chain amino acids and essential fatty acids may appear clinically similar to AE.²

Zinc replacement is the treatment of choice for patients with AE due to dietary deficiency, and replacement therapy should begin with 0.5 to 1 mg/kg daily of elemental zinc.⁵ Response to acquired AE with zinc supplementation often is rapid. Lesions tend to resolve within days to weeks depending on the degree of deficiency.²

Although AE is an uncommon dermatosis in the United States, it is an important diagnosis to make because its clinical features are fairly specific and early zinc supplementation allows for full resolution of the disease without permanent sequelae. The diagnosis of AE should be strongly considered when features of an acral bullous dermatosis are combined with a fissured dermatitis of extensor joints of the hands or elbows. It is particularly important to recognize that alcoholics, burn victims, postsurgical patients, and those with malignancies and eating disorders are at an increased risk for developing this nutritional deficiency.

To the Editor:

Acrodermatitis enteropathica (AE) is an inherited defect in zinc absorption that leads to hypozincemia. Its clinical presentation can vary based on serum zinc level and ranges from periorificial erosive dermatitis to psoriasiform dermatitis.¹ Recognition of the cutaneous manifestations of zinc deficiency can lead to early intervention with zinc supplementation and prevention of long-term morbidity and even mortality. In our case, the coexistence of a bullous acral dermatosis with the additional feature of extensor digital dermatitis with fissuring suggests a diagnosis of AE and can alert the astute clinician to the need for testing of serum zinc levels and/or treatment with zinc supplementation. Causes of acquired zinc deficiency that have been reported in the literature include eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, Crohn disease, food allergy, intestinal parasitic infestations, and an inborn error of metabolism known as nonketotic hyperglycemia (Table).^2-4

RELATED ARTICLE: Acquired Acrodermatitis Enteropathica Secondary to Alcoholism

A 42-year-old woman with a medical history of rheumatoid arthritis and short bowel syndrome due to multiple small bowel obstructions with subsequent bowel resections who was on chronic total parenteral nutrition (TPN) presented with bullae on the hands, shins, and feet. The patient initially noticed small erythematous macules on the hands and feet months prior to presentation. Three weeks prior to presentation, bullae started to form on the hands, mostly between the web spaces; dorsal aspects of the feet; and anterior aspects of the shins. The patient denied any oral ulcers. One day prior to presentation the patient was seen at an outside hospital and was started on prednisone 5 mg daily, oral clindamycin, mupirocin ointment, and nystatin-triamcinolone cream. These medications failed to improve her condition. On review of systems, the patient denied any fever, chills, eye pain, or dysuria.

Upon initial presentation the patient appeared weak and fatigued, though vital signs were normal. Physical examination revealed multiple flaccid bullae in the web spaces of the hands and shallow erosions with hemorrhagic crusts on the bilateral wrists. She also had violaceous patches in the extensor creases of the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and distal interphalangeal joints, which were strikingly symmetric (Figure 1). Prominent flaccid bullae and shallow erosions with hemorrhagic crusts also were present on the bilateral shins and dorsal aspects of the feet (Figure 2). No oral ulcers were present. A punch biopsy from the dorsal aspect of the left foot revealed psoriasiform hyperplasia of the epidermis with prominent ballooning degeneration and hyperkeratosis/parakeratosis (Figure 3); a periodic acid–Schiff stain was negative for fungal organisms.

Given the biopsy results and clinical presentation, a nutritional deficiency was suspected and serum levels of zinc, vitamin B₁, vitamin B₂, and vitamin B₃ were assessed. Vitamins B₁, B₂, and B₃ all were within reference range, but the patient’s serum zinc level was found to be low at 11 μg/mL (reference range, 55–150 μg/mL). The alkaline phosphatase level also was measured to be low at 22 U/L (reference range, 31–103 U/L). Additionally, a hepatitis panel was drawn and glucagon levels were checked, which were found to be within reference range. These findings were consistent with a diagnosis of acquired AE. Prednisone and clindamycin were stopped and the patient was started on zinc supplementation in her TPN therapy. Mupirocin ointment was continued on the existing bullae. Upon discharge 10 days later, there were no new bullae and the existing bullae had sloughed off, revealing healthy skin underneath.

Zinc is an essential trace element and can be found in high concentration in foods such as shellfish, green vegetables, legumes, nuts, and whole grains.⁶ The majority of zinc is absorbed in the jejunum; as such, many cases of acquired zinc deficiency leading to AE are dueto disorders that affect the small intestine.² Conditions that may lead to poor gastrointestinal zinc absorption include alcoholism, eating disorders, TPN, burns, surgery, and malignancies.^2,7

Diagnosis typically is made based on characteristic clinical features, biopsy results, and a measurement of the serum zinc concentration. Although a low serum zinc level supports the diagnosis, serum zinc concentration is not a reliable indicator of body zinc stores and a normal serum zinc concentration does not rule out AE. The gold standard for diagnosis is the resolution of lesions after zinc supplementation.¹ Notably, because the production of alkaline phosphatase is dependent on zinc, levels of this enzyme also may be low in cases of AE,⁶ as in our patient.

The clinical manifestations of AE can vary greatly; patients may initially present with eczematous pink scaly plaques, which may subsequently become vesicular, bullous, pustular, or desquamative. The lesions may develop over the arms and legs as well as the anogenital and periorificial areas.⁵ Other notable manifestations that may present early in the course of AE include angular cheilitis followed by paronychia. In patients who are not promptly treated, long-term zinc deficiency may lead to growth delay, mental slowing, poor wound healing, anemia, and anorexia.⁵ Of note, deficiencies of branched-chain amino acids and essential fatty acids may appear clinically similar to AE.²

Zinc replacement is the treatment of choice for patients with AE due to dietary deficiency, and replacement therapy should begin with 0.5 to 1 mg/kg daily of elemental zinc.⁵ Response to acquired AE with zinc supplementation often is rapid. Lesions tend to resolve within days to weeks depending on the degree of deficiency.²

Although AE is an uncommon dermatosis in the United States, it is an important diagnosis to make because its clinical features are fairly specific and early zinc supplementation allows for full resolution of the disease without permanent sequelae. The diagnosis of AE should be strongly considered when features of an acral bullous dermatosis are combined with a fissured dermatitis of extensor joints of the hands or elbows. It is particularly important to recognize that alcoholics, burn victims, postsurgical patients, and those with malignancies and eating disorders are at an increased risk for developing this nutritional deficiency.

To the Editor:

Chronic UV exposure has been linked to increased skin fragility and the development of purpuric lesions, a benign condition known as actinic purpura and commonly seen in elderly patients. Petechial skin changes acutely following intense sun exposure is a rare phenomenon referred to as sunburn purpura, photolocalized purpura, or solar purpura.

A 19-year-old woman presented with red and purple spots on the pretibial region of both legs extending to the thigh. One week prior to presentation she had a severe sunburn affecting most of the body, which resolved without blistering. Two days later, the spots appeared within the most severely sunburned areas of both legs. The patient reported that the lesions were mildly painful to palpation, but she was more concerned about the appearance. She denied any history of similar skin changes associated with sun exposure. The patient was otherwise healthy and denied any recent illnesses. She noted a history of mild bruising and bleeding with a resulting unremarkable workup by her primary care physician. The only medication taken was etonogestrel-ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring.

The scalp, face, arms, trunk, and legs were examined, and nonpalpable petechial changes were noted on the anterior aspect of the legs (Figure 1), with changes more prominent on the distal aspect of the legs. Mild superficial epidermal exfoliation was noted on both anterior thighs. The area of the lesions was not warm. The lesions were mildly tender to palpation. The remainder of the physical examination was unremarkable.

Given the timing of onset, preceding sun exposure, and the morphologic characteristics of the lesions, sunburn purpura was suspected. A punch biopsy of the anterior aspect of the left thigh was performed to rule out vasculitis. Microscopic examination revealed reactive epidermal changes with mild vascular ectasia and erythrocyte extravasation not associated with appreciable inflammation or evidence of vascular injury (Figure 2). Biopsy exposure to fluorescein-labeled antibodies directed against IgG, IgM, IgA, C3, and polyvalent immunoglobulins (IgG, IgM, and IgA) yielded no immunofluorescence. These biopsy results were consistent with sunburn purpura. Given the patient's normal platelet count, a diagnosis of idiopathic sunburn purpura was made. The patient was informed of the biopsy results and advised that the petechiae should resolve without treatment in 1 to 2 weeks, which occurred.

Sunburn purpura remains a rare phenomenon in which a petechial or purpuric rash develops acutely after intense sun exposure. We prefer the term sunburn purpura because it reflects the acuity of the phenomenon, as opposed to the previous labels solar purpura or photolocalized purpura, which also could suggest causality from chronic sun exposure. It has been proposed that sunburn purpura is a finding associated with a number of conditions rather than a unique entity.¹ The following characteristics can be helpful in describing the development of sunburn purpura: delay following UV exposure, gross morphology, histologic findings, and possible associated medical conditions.¹ Our case represents an important addition to the literature, as it differs from previously reported cases. Most importantly, the nonspecific biopsy findings and unremarkable laboratory findings associated with our case may represent primary or idiopathic sunburn purpura.

Previously reported cases of sunburn purpura have occurred in patients aged 10 to 66 years. It has been seen following UV exposure, vigorous exercise and high-dose aspirin, or concurrent fluoroquinolone therapy, or in the setting of erythropoietic protoporphyria, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, or polymorphous light eruption.^2-8 When performed, histology has revealed capillaritis, solar elastosis, perivascular infiltrate, lymphocytic perivascular infiltrate with dermal edema, or leukocytoclastic vasculitis.^1,2,7-9 Our patient did not have a history of erythropoietic protoporphyria, polymorphous light eruption, or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. She had not recently exercised, was not thrombocytopenic, and was not taking antiplatelet medications. She had no recent history of fluoroquinolone use. On histologic examination, our patient's biopsy demonstrated nonspecific petechial changes without signs of chronic UV exposure, dermal edema, vasculitis, lymphocytic infiltrate, or capillaritis.

Idiopathic sunburn purpura should only be diagnosed after other conditions are excluded. When evaluating a patient who presents with new-onset petechial rash following sun exposure, it is important to rule out vasculitis or thrombocytopenia as the cause, which is best achieved through skin biopsy and a platelet count, respectively. If there are no associated symptoms or thrombocytopenia and biopsy shows nonspecific vascular ectasia and erythrocyte extravasation, the physician should consider the diagnosis of idiopathic sunburn (solar or photolocalized) purpura. Along with regular UV protection, the physician should advise that the rash typically resolves without treatment in 1 to 2 weeks.

To the Editor:

Chronic UV exposure has been linked to increased skin fragility and the development of purpuric lesions, a benign condition known as actinic purpura and commonly seen in elderly patients. Petechial skin changes acutely following intense sun exposure is a rare phenomenon referred to as sunburn purpura, photolocalized purpura, or solar purpura.

A 19-year-old woman presented with red and purple spots on the pretibial region of both legs extending to the thigh. One week prior to presentation she had a severe sunburn affecting most of the body, which resolved without blistering. Two days later, the spots appeared within the most severely sunburned areas of both legs. The patient reported that the lesions were mildly painful to palpation, but she was more concerned about the appearance. She denied any history of similar skin changes associated with sun exposure. The patient was otherwise healthy and denied any recent illnesses. She noted a history of mild bruising and bleeding with a resulting unremarkable workup by her primary care physician. The only medication taken was etonogestrel-ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring.

The scalp, face, arms, trunk, and legs were examined, and nonpalpable petechial changes were noted on the anterior aspect of the legs (Figure 1), with changes more prominent on the distal aspect of the legs. Mild superficial epidermal exfoliation was noted on both anterior thighs. The area of the lesions was not warm. The lesions were mildly tender to palpation. The remainder of the physical examination was unremarkable.

Given the timing of onset, preceding sun exposure, and the morphologic characteristics of the lesions, sunburn purpura was suspected. A punch biopsy of the anterior aspect of the left thigh was performed to rule out vasculitis. Microscopic examination revealed reactive epidermal changes with mild vascular ectasia and erythrocyte extravasation not associated with appreciable inflammation or evidence of vascular injury (Figure 2). Biopsy exposure to fluorescein-labeled antibodies directed against IgG, IgM, IgA, C3, and polyvalent immunoglobulins (IgG, IgM, and IgA) yielded no immunofluorescence. These biopsy results were consistent with sunburn purpura. Given the patient's normal platelet count, a diagnosis of idiopathic sunburn purpura was made. The patient was informed of the biopsy results and advised that the petechiae should resolve without treatment in 1 to 2 weeks, which occurred.

Sunburn purpura remains a rare phenomenon in which a petechial or purpuric rash develops acutely after intense sun exposure. We prefer the term sunburn purpura because it reflects the acuity of the phenomenon, as opposed to the previous labels solar purpura or photolocalized purpura, which also could suggest causality from chronic sun exposure. It has been proposed that sunburn purpura is a finding associated with a number of conditions rather than a unique entity.¹ The following characteristics can be helpful in describing the development of sunburn purpura: delay following UV exposure, gross morphology, histologic findings, and possible associated medical conditions.¹ Our case represents an important addition to the literature, as it differs from previously reported cases. Most importantly, the nonspecific biopsy findings and unremarkable laboratory findings associated with our case may represent primary or idiopathic sunburn purpura.

Previously reported cases of sunburn purpura have occurred in patients aged 10 to 66 years. It has been seen following UV exposure, vigorous exercise and high-dose aspirin, or concurrent fluoroquinolone therapy, or in the setting of erythropoietic protoporphyria, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, or polymorphous light eruption.^2-8 When performed, histology has revealed capillaritis, solar elastosis, perivascular infiltrate, lymphocytic perivascular infiltrate with dermal edema, or leukocytoclastic vasculitis.^1,2,7-9 Our patient did not have a history of erythropoietic protoporphyria, polymorphous light eruption, or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. She had not recently exercised, was not thrombocytopenic, and was not taking antiplatelet medications. She had no recent history of fluoroquinolone use. On histologic examination, our patient's biopsy demonstrated nonspecific petechial changes without signs of chronic UV exposure, dermal edema, vasculitis, lymphocytic infiltrate, or capillaritis.

Idiopathic sunburn purpura should only be diagnosed after other conditions are excluded. When evaluating a patient who presents with new-onset petechial rash following sun exposure, it is important to rule out vasculitis or thrombocytopenia as the cause, which is best achieved through skin biopsy and a platelet count, respectively. If there are no associated symptoms or thrombocytopenia and biopsy shows nonspecific vascular ectasia and erythrocyte extravasation, the physician should consider the diagnosis of idiopathic sunburn (solar or photolocalized) purpura. Along with regular UV protection, the physician should advise that the rash typically resolves without treatment in 1 to 2 weeks.

To the Editor:

Chronic UV exposure has been linked to increased skin fragility and the development of purpuric lesions, a benign condition known as actinic purpura and commonly seen in elderly patients. Petechial skin changes acutely following intense sun exposure is a rare phenomenon referred to as sunburn purpura, photolocalized purpura, or solar purpura.

A 19-year-old woman presented with red and purple spots on the pretibial region of both legs extending to the thigh. One week prior to presentation she had a severe sunburn affecting most of the body, which resolved without blistering. Two days later, the spots appeared within the most severely sunburned areas of both legs. The patient reported that the lesions were mildly painful to palpation, but she was more concerned about the appearance. She denied any history of similar skin changes associated with sun exposure. The patient was otherwise healthy and denied any recent illnesses. She noted a history of mild bruising and bleeding with a resulting unremarkable workup by her primary care physician. The only medication taken was etonogestrel-ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring.

The scalp, face, arms, trunk, and legs were examined, and nonpalpable petechial changes were noted on the anterior aspect of the legs (Figure 1), with changes more prominent on the distal aspect of the legs. Mild superficial epidermal exfoliation was noted on both anterior thighs. The area of the lesions was not warm. The lesions were mildly tender to palpation. The remainder of the physical examination was unremarkable.

Given the timing of onset, preceding sun exposure, and the morphologic characteristics of the lesions, sunburn purpura was suspected. A punch biopsy of the anterior aspect of the left thigh was performed to rule out vasculitis. Microscopic examination revealed reactive epidermal changes with mild vascular ectasia and erythrocyte extravasation not associated with appreciable inflammation or evidence of vascular injury (Figure 2). Biopsy exposure to fluorescein-labeled antibodies directed against IgG, IgM, IgA, C3, and polyvalent immunoglobulins (IgG, IgM, and IgA) yielded no immunofluorescence. These biopsy results were consistent with sunburn purpura. Given the patient's normal platelet count, a diagnosis of idiopathic sunburn purpura was made. The patient was informed of the biopsy results and advised that the petechiae should resolve without treatment in 1 to 2 weeks, which occurred.

Sunburn purpura remains a rare phenomenon in which a petechial or purpuric rash develops acutely after intense sun exposure. We prefer the term sunburn purpura because it reflects the acuity of the phenomenon, as opposed to the previous labels solar purpura or photolocalized purpura, which also could suggest causality from chronic sun exposure. It has been proposed that sunburn purpura is a finding associated with a number of conditions rather than a unique entity.¹ The following characteristics can be helpful in describing the development of sunburn purpura: delay following UV exposure, gross morphology, histologic findings, and possible associated medical conditions.¹ Our case represents an important addition to the literature, as it differs from previously reported cases. Most importantly, the nonspecific biopsy findings and unremarkable laboratory findings associated with our case may represent primary or idiopathic sunburn purpura.

Previously reported cases of sunburn purpura have occurred in patients aged 10 to 66 years. It has been seen following UV exposure, vigorous exercise and high-dose aspirin, or concurrent fluoroquinolone therapy, or in the setting of erythropoietic protoporphyria, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, or polymorphous light eruption.^2-8 When performed, histology has revealed capillaritis, solar elastosis, perivascular infiltrate, lymphocytic perivascular infiltrate with dermal edema, or leukocytoclastic vasculitis.^1,2,7-9 Our patient did not have a history of erythropoietic protoporphyria, polymorphous light eruption, or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. She had not recently exercised, was not thrombocytopenic, and was not taking antiplatelet medications. She had no recent history of fluoroquinolone use. On histologic examination, our patient's biopsy demonstrated nonspecific petechial changes without signs of chronic UV exposure, dermal edema, vasculitis, lymphocytic infiltrate, or capillaritis.

Idiopathic sunburn purpura should only be diagnosed after other conditions are excluded. When evaluating a patient who presents with new-onset petechial rash following sun exposure, it is important to rule out vasculitis or thrombocytopenia as the cause, which is best achieved through skin biopsy and a platelet count, respectively. If there are no associated symptoms or thrombocytopenia and biopsy shows nonspecific vascular ectasia and erythrocyte extravasation, the physician should consider the diagnosis of idiopathic sunburn (solar or photolocalized) purpura. Along with regular UV protection, the physician should advise that the rash typically resolves without treatment in 1 to 2 weeks.

To the Editor:

Purpura annularis telangiectodes of Majocchi (PATM) is a type of pigmented purpuric dermatosis (PPD). Patients present with nonblanchable, annular, symmetric, purpuric, and telangiectatic patches, often on the legs, with histology revealing a perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate and extravasated erythrocytes.^1,2 A variety of medications have been linked to the development of PPD. We describe a case of levofloxacin-induced PATM.

RELATED ARTICLE: Granulomatous Changes Associated With Pigmented Purpuric Dermatosis

A 42-year-old man presented with a rash on the arms, trunk, abdomen, and legs of 1 month’s duration. He reported no associated itching, bleeding, or pain, and no history of a similar rash. He had a history of hypothyroidism and had been taking levothyroxine for years. He had no known allergies and no history of childhood eczema, asthma, or allergic rhinitis. Notably, the rash started shortly after the patient finished a 2-week course of levofloxacin, an antibiotic he had not taken in the past. The patient resided with his wife, 3 children, and a pet dog, and no family members had the rash. Prior to presentation, the patient had tried econazole cream and then triamcinolone acetonide cream 0.5% without any clinical improvement.

A complete review of systems was unremarkable. Physical examination revealed scattered, reddish brown, annular, nonscaly patches on the back, abdomen (Figure 1), arms, and legs with nonblanching petechiae within the patches.

A punch biopsy of the left inner thigh demonstrated patchy interface dermatitis, superficial perivascular inflammation, and numerous extravasated red blood cells in the papillary dermis (Figure 2). The histologic features were compatible with the clinical impression of PATM. The patient presented for a follow-up visit 2 weeks later with no new lesions and the old lesions were rapidly fading (Figure 3).

Pigmented purpuric dermatoses are a group of conditions that have different clinical morphologies but similar histopathologic examinations.² All PPDs are characterized by nonblanching, nonpalpable, purpuric lesions that often are bilaterally symmetrical and present on the legs.^2,3 Although the precise etiology of these conditions is not known, most cases include a perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate along with the presence of extravasated erythrocytes and hemosiderin deposition in the dermis.² Of note, PATM often is idiopathic and patients usually present with no associated comorbidities.³ The currently established PPDs include progressive pigmentary dermatosis (Schamberg disease), PATM, pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatosis of Gougerot and Blum, lichen aureus, and eczematidlike purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis.^2,4

RELATED ARTICLE: Granulomatous Pigmented Purpuric Dermatosis

The lesions of PATM are symmetrically distributed on the bilateral legs and may be symptomatic in most cases, with severe pruritus being reported in several drug-induced PATM cases.^3,5 Although the exact etiology of PPDs currently is unknown, some contributing factors that are thought to play a role include exercise, venous stasis, gravitational dependence, capillary fragility, hypertension, drugs, chemical exposure or ingestions, and contact allergy to dyes.³ Some of the drugs known to cause drug-induced PPDs fall into the class of sedatives, stimulants, antibiotics, cardiovascular drugs, vitamins, and nutritional supplements.^3,6 Some medications that have been reported to cause PPDs include acetaminophen, aspirin, carbamazepine, diltiazem, furosemide, glipizide, hydralazine, infliximab, isotretinoin, lorazepam, minocycline, nitroglycerine, and sildenafil.^3,7-15

Although the mechanism of drug-induced PPD is not completely understood, it is thought that the ingested substance leads to an immunologic response in the capillary endothelium, which results in a cell-mediated immune response causing vascular damage.³ The ingested substance may act as a hapten, stimulating antibody formation and immune-mediated injury, leading to the clinical presentation of nonblanching, symmetric, purpuric, telangiectatic, and atrophic patches at the site of injury.^1,3

Levofloxacin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that has activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. It inhibits the enzymes DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, preventing bacteria from undergoing proper DNA synthesis.¹⁶ Our patient’s rash began shortly after a 2-week course of levofloxacin and faded within a few weeks of discontinuing the drug; the clinical presentation, time course, and histologic appearance of the lesions were consistent with the diagnosis of drug-induced PPD. Of note, solar capillaritis has been reported following a phototoxic reaction induced by levofloxacin.¹⁷ Our case differs in that our patient had annular lesions on both photoprotected and photoexposed skin.

The first-line interventions for the treatment of PPDs are nonpharmacologic, such as discontinuation of an offending drug or allergen or wearing supportive stockings if there are signs of venous stasis. Other interventions include the use of a medium- or high-potency topical corticosteroid once to twice daily to affected areas for 4 to 6 weeks.¹⁸ Some case series also have shown improvement with narrowband UVB treatment after 24 to 28 treatment sessions or with psoralen plus UVA phototherapy within 7 to 20 treatments.^19,20 If the above measures are unsuccessful in resolving symptoms, other treatment alternatives may include pentoxifylline, griseofulvin, colchicine, cyclosporine, and methotrexate. The potential benefit of treatment must be weighed against the side-effect profile of these medications.^2,21-24 Of note, oral rutoside (50 mg twice daily) and ascorbic acid (500 mg twice daily) were administered to 3 patients with chronic progressive pigmented purpura. At the end of the 4-week treatment period, complete clearance of skin lesions was seen in all patients with no adverse reactions noted.²⁵

Despite these treatment options, PATM does not necessitate treatment given its benign course and often self-resolving nature.²⁶ In cases of drug-induced PPD such as in our patient, discontinuation of the offending drug often may lead to resolution.

In summary, PATM is a PPD that has been associated with different etiologic factors. If PATM is suspected to be caused by a drug, discontinuation of the offending agent usually results in resolution of symptoms, as it did in our case with fading of lesions within a few weeks after the patient was no longer taking levofloxacin.

To the Editor:

Purpura annularis telangiectodes of Majocchi (PATM) is a type of pigmented purpuric dermatosis (PPD). Patients present with nonblanchable, annular, symmetric, purpuric, and telangiectatic patches, often on the legs, with histology revealing a perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate and extravasated erythrocytes.^1,2 A variety of medications have been linked to the development of PPD. We describe a case of levofloxacin-induced PATM.

RELATED ARTICLE: Granulomatous Changes Associated With Pigmented Purpuric Dermatosis

A 42-year-old man presented with a rash on the arms, trunk, abdomen, and legs of 1 month’s duration. He reported no associated itching, bleeding, or pain, and no history of a similar rash. He had a history of hypothyroidism and had been taking levothyroxine for years. He had no known allergies and no history of childhood eczema, asthma, or allergic rhinitis. Notably, the rash started shortly after the patient finished a 2-week course of levofloxacin, an antibiotic he had not taken in the past. The patient resided with his wife, 3 children, and a pet dog, and no family members had the rash. Prior to presentation, the patient had tried econazole cream and then triamcinolone acetonide cream 0.5% without any clinical improvement.

A complete review of systems was unremarkable. Physical examination revealed scattered, reddish brown, annular, nonscaly patches on the back, abdomen (Figure 1), arms, and legs with nonblanching petechiae within the patches.

A punch biopsy of the left inner thigh demonstrated patchy interface dermatitis, superficial perivascular inflammation, and numerous extravasated red blood cells in the papillary dermis (Figure 2). The histologic features were compatible with the clinical impression of PATM. The patient presented for a follow-up visit 2 weeks later with no new lesions and the old lesions were rapidly fading (Figure 3).

Pigmented purpuric dermatoses are a group of conditions that have different clinical morphologies but similar histopathologic examinations.² All PPDs are characterized by nonblanching, nonpalpable, purpuric lesions that often are bilaterally symmetrical and present on the legs.^2,3 Although the precise etiology of these conditions is not known, most cases include a perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate along with the presence of extravasated erythrocytes and hemosiderin deposition in the dermis.² Of note, PATM often is idiopathic and patients usually present with no associated comorbidities.³ The currently established PPDs include progressive pigmentary dermatosis (Schamberg disease), PATM, pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatosis of Gougerot and Blum, lichen aureus, and eczematidlike purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis.^2,4

RELATED ARTICLE: Granulomatous Pigmented Purpuric Dermatosis

The lesions of PATM are symmetrically distributed on the bilateral legs and may be symptomatic in most cases, with severe pruritus being reported in several drug-induced PATM cases.^3,5 Although the exact etiology of PPDs currently is unknown, some contributing factors that are thought to play a role include exercise, venous stasis, gravitational dependence, capillary fragility, hypertension, drugs, chemical exposure or ingestions, and contact allergy to dyes.³ Some of the drugs known to cause drug-induced PPDs fall into the class of sedatives, stimulants, antibiotics, cardiovascular drugs, vitamins, and nutritional supplements.^3,6 Some medications that have been reported to cause PPDs include acetaminophen, aspirin, carbamazepine, diltiazem, furosemide, glipizide, hydralazine, infliximab, isotretinoin, lorazepam, minocycline, nitroglycerine, and sildenafil.^3,7-15

Although the mechanism of drug-induced PPD is not completely understood, it is thought that the ingested substance leads to an immunologic response in the capillary endothelium, which results in a cell-mediated immune response causing vascular damage.³ The ingested substance may act as a hapten, stimulating antibody formation and immune-mediated injury, leading to the clinical presentation of nonblanching, symmetric, purpuric, telangiectatic, and atrophic patches at the site of injury.^1,3

Levofloxacin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that has activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. It inhibits the enzymes DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, preventing bacteria from undergoing proper DNA synthesis.¹⁶ Our patient’s rash began shortly after a 2-week course of levofloxacin and faded within a few weeks of discontinuing the drug; the clinical presentation, time course, and histologic appearance of the lesions were consistent with the diagnosis of drug-induced PPD. Of note, solar capillaritis has been reported following a phototoxic reaction induced by levofloxacin.¹⁷ Our case differs in that our patient had annular lesions on both photoprotected and photoexposed skin.

The first-line interventions for the treatment of PPDs are nonpharmacologic, such as discontinuation of an offending drug or allergen or wearing supportive stockings if there are signs of venous stasis. Other interventions include the use of a medium- or high-potency topical corticosteroid once to twice daily to affected areas for 4 to 6 weeks.¹⁸ Some case series also have shown improvement with narrowband UVB treatment after 24 to 28 treatment sessions or with psoralen plus UVA phototherapy within 7 to 20 treatments.^19,20 If the above measures are unsuccessful in resolving symptoms, other treatment alternatives may include pentoxifylline, griseofulvin, colchicine, cyclosporine, and methotrexate. The potential benefit of treatment must be weighed against the side-effect profile of these medications.^2,21-24 Of note, oral rutoside (50 mg twice daily) and ascorbic acid (500 mg twice daily) were administered to 3 patients with chronic progressive pigmented purpura. At the end of the 4-week treatment period, complete clearance of skin lesions was seen in all patients with no adverse reactions noted.²⁵

Despite these treatment options, PATM does not necessitate treatment given its benign course and often self-resolving nature.²⁶ In cases of drug-induced PPD such as in our patient, discontinuation of the offending drug often may lead to resolution.

In summary, PATM is a PPD that has been associated with different etiologic factors. If PATM is suspected to be caused by a drug, discontinuation of the offending agent usually results in resolution of symptoms, as it did in our case with fading of lesions within a few weeks after the patient was no longer taking levofloxacin.

To the Editor:

Purpura annularis telangiectodes of Majocchi (PATM) is a type of pigmented purpuric dermatosis (PPD). Patients present with nonblanchable, annular, symmetric, purpuric, and telangiectatic patches, often on the legs, with histology revealing a perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate and extravasated erythrocytes.^1,2 A variety of medications have been linked to the development of PPD. We describe a case of levofloxacin-induced PATM.

RELATED ARTICLE: Granulomatous Changes Associated With Pigmented Purpuric Dermatosis

A 42-year-old man presented with a rash on the arms, trunk, abdomen, and legs of 1 month’s duration. He reported no associated itching, bleeding, or pain, and no history of a similar rash. He had a history of hypothyroidism and had been taking levothyroxine for years. He had no known allergies and no history of childhood eczema, asthma, or allergic rhinitis. Notably, the rash started shortly after the patient finished a 2-week course of levofloxacin, an antibiotic he had not taken in the past. The patient resided with his wife, 3 children, and a pet dog, and no family members had the rash. Prior to presentation, the patient had tried econazole cream and then triamcinolone acetonide cream 0.5% without any clinical improvement.

A complete review of systems was unremarkable. Physical examination revealed scattered, reddish brown, annular, nonscaly patches on the back, abdomen (Figure 1), arms, and legs with nonblanching petechiae within the patches.

A punch biopsy of the left inner thigh demonstrated patchy interface dermatitis, superficial perivascular inflammation, and numerous extravasated red blood cells in the papillary dermis (Figure 2). The histologic features were compatible with the clinical impression of PATM. The patient presented for a follow-up visit 2 weeks later with no new lesions and the old lesions were rapidly fading (Figure 3).

Pigmented purpuric dermatoses are a group of conditions that have different clinical morphologies but similar histopathologic examinations.² All PPDs are characterized by nonblanching, nonpalpable, purpuric lesions that often are bilaterally symmetrical and present on the legs.^2,3 Although the precise etiology of these conditions is not known, most cases include a perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate along with the presence of extravasated erythrocytes and hemosiderin deposition in the dermis.² Of note, PATM often is idiopathic and patients usually present with no associated comorbidities.³ The currently established PPDs include progressive pigmentary dermatosis (Schamberg disease), PATM, pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatosis of Gougerot and Blum, lichen aureus, and eczematidlike purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis.^2,4

RELATED ARTICLE: Granulomatous Pigmented Purpuric Dermatosis

The lesions of PATM are symmetrically distributed on the bilateral legs and may be symptomatic in most cases, with severe pruritus being reported in several drug-induced PATM cases.^3,5 Although the exact etiology of PPDs currently is unknown, some contributing factors that are thought to play a role include exercise, venous stasis, gravitational dependence, capillary fragility, hypertension, drugs, chemical exposure or ingestions, and contact allergy to dyes.³ Some of the drugs known to cause drug-induced PPDs fall into the class of sedatives, stimulants, antibiotics, cardiovascular drugs, vitamins, and nutritional supplements.^3,6 Some medications that have been reported to cause PPDs include acetaminophen, aspirin, carbamazepine, diltiazem, furosemide, glipizide, hydralazine, infliximab, isotretinoin, lorazepam, minocycline, nitroglycerine, and sildenafil.^3,7-15

Although the mechanism of drug-induced PPD is not completely understood, it is thought that the ingested substance leads to an immunologic response in the capillary endothelium, which results in a cell-mediated immune response causing vascular damage.³ The ingested substance may act as a hapten, stimulating antibody formation and immune-mediated injury, leading to the clinical presentation of nonblanching, symmetric, purpuric, telangiectatic, and atrophic patches at the site of injury.^1,3

Levofloxacin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that has activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. It inhibits the enzymes DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, preventing bacteria from undergoing proper DNA synthesis.¹⁶ Our patient’s rash began shortly after a 2-week course of levofloxacin and faded within a few weeks of discontinuing the drug; the clinical presentation, time course, and histologic appearance of the lesions were consistent with the diagnosis of drug-induced PPD. Of note, solar capillaritis has been reported following a phototoxic reaction induced by levofloxacin.¹⁷ Our case differs in that our patient had annular lesions on both photoprotected and photoexposed skin.

The first-line interventions for the treatment of PPDs are nonpharmacologic, such as discontinuation of an offending drug or allergen or wearing supportive stockings if there are signs of venous stasis. Other interventions include the use of a medium- or high-potency topical corticosteroid once to twice daily to affected areas for 4 to 6 weeks.¹⁸ Some case series also have shown improvement with narrowband UVB treatment after 24 to 28 treatment sessions or with psoralen plus UVA phototherapy within 7 to 20 treatments.^19,20 If the above measures are unsuccessful in resolving symptoms, other treatment alternatives may include pentoxifylline, griseofulvin, colchicine, cyclosporine, and methotrexate. The potential benefit of treatment must be weighed against the side-effect profile of these medications.^2,21-24 Of note, oral rutoside (50 mg twice daily) and ascorbic acid (500 mg twice daily) were administered to 3 patients with chronic progressive pigmented purpura. At the end of the 4-week treatment period, complete clearance of skin lesions was seen in all patients with no adverse reactions noted.²⁵

Despite these treatment options, PATM does not necessitate treatment given its benign course and often self-resolving nature.²⁶ In cases of drug-induced PPD such as in our patient, discontinuation of the offending drug often may lead to resolution.

In summary, PATM is a PPD that has been associated with different etiologic factors. If PATM is suspected to be caused by a drug, discontinuation of the offending agent usually results in resolution of symptoms, as it did in our case with fading of lesions within a few weeks after the patient was no longer taking levofloxacin.

To the Editor:

A 69-year-old woman with no history of immunodeficiency presented 1 month after a thorn from her locally grown Madagascar palm plant (Pachypodium lamerei) pierced the skin. The patient developed a painful nodule at the site on the left elbow (Figure 1). An excisional biopsy by an outside dermatologist was performed, which showed granulomatous inflammation within the dermis with epidermal hyperplasia and the presence of golden brown spherules (medlar bodies). The diagnosis was a dermal fungal infection consistent with chromoblastomycosis. A curative surgical excision was performed, and medlar bodies were seen adjacent to a polarizable foreign body consistent with plant material on histology (Figure 2). Because the lesion was localized, adjuvant medical treatment was not deemed necessary. The patient has not had any recurrence in the last 1.5 years since the resection.

The categorization of chromoblastomycosis includes a chronic fungal infection of the cutaneous and subcutaneous tissues by dematiaceous (pigmented) fungi. This definition is such that there are a multitude of organisms that can be the primary cause of this diagnosis. Generally, infection follows a traumatic permeation of the skin by a foreign body contaminated by the causative organism in agricultural workers. The most common dematiaceous pathogens are Fonsecaea pedrosoi, Phialophora verrucosa, and Cladosporium carrionii; however, the specific causative organism varies heavily on geographic location. With inoculation by a foreign body, a small papule develops at the site of the lesion. Several years after the primary infection, nodules and verrucous erythematous plaques develop in the same area, and patients present with concerns of pain and pruritus.¹ Lesions usually are localized to the initial area of inoculation, generally a break in the skin by the offending foreign body, on the legs, arms, or hands, but hematogenous or lymphatic dissemination with distant transmission due to scratching also can occur. Ulceration due to secondary bacterial infection is another possible manifestation, resulting in a foul odor and less commonly lymphedema. Rarely, squamous cell carcinoma is a complication.²

RELATED ARTICLE: Fungal Foes: Presentations of Chromoblastomycosis Post–Hurricane Ike

On histopathology, thick-walled sclerotic bodies termed medlar bodies or copper pennies are pathognomonic for chromoblastomycosis and represent the fungal elements. Grossly, black dots can be seen on the skin in the affected areas from the transepidermal elimination of the fungi.^1,2 However, there is no specificity for determining the causative organism in this manner, or even with culture, as it is difficult to differentiate the species morphologically. More advanced tests can help, such as polymerase chain reaction or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, where available.² Hematoxylin and eosin stain also shows epidermal hyperplasia and dermal mononuclear infiltrate.

Treatment modalities include surgical excision, cryotherapy, pharmacologic treatment, and combination therapy. Localized lesions often can be resected, but more severe infections can require pharmacologic treatment. Unfortunately, there tends to be a high risk for relapse with most antifungal modalities. The combination of itraconazole and terbinafine has been shown to offer the best medical therapy with lower risk for refractoriness to treatment by producing a synergistic effect between the 2 antifungals.^2,3 Many surgical treatments often are combined with oral antifungals to try to attain complete eradication in deep or extensive lesions, as seen in a case in which oral terbinafine was used prior to surgery to reduce the size of the lesion, followed by complete resection.⁴ With localized lesions that are resectable, a wide and deep incision often can be curative. Cryotherapy also may be coupled with surgical excision or pharmacologic therapy. Most literature suggests that cryotherapy or the use of antifungals prior to excision offers improved outcomes.^2,5 Prognosis tends to be good for chromoblastomycoses, particularly with smaller lesions. Complete eradication varies greatly on the size and depth of the lesion, independent of the causative pathogen.

Our patient’s presentation with chromoblastomycosis is unique because of the source of infection, which was a plant grown from seeds in a local nursery in South Florida and then sold to the patient. The majority of chromoblastomycosis infections occur in agricultural workers, typically in tropical climates such as South and Central America, the Caribbean, and Mexico.^1,2 Historically, infections in the United States have been uncommon, with the majority presenting in patients on prolonged corticosteroid therapy or with other immunosuppressive conditions.^6,7 This presentation of a chromoblastomycosis infection in a 69-year-old woman with no history of immunosuppression or chronic disease can serve as a teaching point about atypical presentations of the disease. The Madagascar palm plant that was responsible for the initial lesion in our case is a member of the Pachypodium species of plant that is endemic to Madagascar, one of the few regions outside of Latin America that has displayed numerous cases of chromoblastomycosis. In this fashion, a domestic gardener can now become exposed to dematiaceous pathogens that normally are not found in the continental United States, and knowledge of this possible exposure source can be crucial in the diagnosis and management of similar patients.

To the Editor:

A 69-year-old woman with no history of immunodeficiency presented 1 month after a thorn from her locally grown Madagascar palm plant (Pachypodium lamerei) pierced the skin. The patient developed a painful nodule at the site on the left elbow (Figure 1). An excisional biopsy by an outside dermatologist was performed, which showed granulomatous inflammation within the dermis with epidermal hyperplasia and the presence of golden brown spherules (medlar bodies). The diagnosis was a dermal fungal infection consistent with chromoblastomycosis. A curative surgical excision was performed, and medlar bodies were seen adjacent to a polarizable foreign body consistent with plant material on histology (Figure 2). Because the lesion was localized, adjuvant medical treatment was not deemed necessary. The patient has not had any recurrence in the last 1.5 years since the resection.

The categorization of chromoblastomycosis includes a chronic fungal infection of the cutaneous and subcutaneous tissues by dematiaceous (pigmented) fungi. This definition is such that there are a multitude of organisms that can be the primary cause of this diagnosis. Generally, infection follows a traumatic permeation of the skin by a foreign body contaminated by the causative organism in agricultural workers. The most common dematiaceous pathogens are Fonsecaea pedrosoi, Phialophora verrucosa, and Cladosporium carrionii; however, the specific causative organism varies heavily on geographic location. With inoculation by a foreign body, a small papule develops at the site of the lesion. Several years after the primary infection, nodules and verrucous erythematous plaques develop in the same area, and patients present with concerns of pain and pruritus.¹ Lesions usually are localized to the initial area of inoculation, generally a break in the skin by the offending foreign body, on the legs, arms, or hands, but hematogenous or lymphatic dissemination with distant transmission due to scratching also can occur. Ulceration due to secondary bacterial infection is another possible manifestation, resulting in a foul odor and less commonly lymphedema. Rarely, squamous cell carcinoma is a complication.²

RELATED ARTICLE: Fungal Foes: Presentations of Chromoblastomycosis Post–Hurricane Ike

On histopathology, thick-walled sclerotic bodies termed medlar bodies or copper pennies are pathognomonic for chromoblastomycosis and represent the fungal elements. Grossly, black dots can be seen on the skin in the affected areas from the transepidermal elimination of the fungi.^1,2 However, there is no specificity for determining the causative organism in this manner, or even with culture, as it is difficult to differentiate the species morphologically. More advanced tests can help, such as polymerase chain reaction or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, where available.² Hematoxylin and eosin stain also shows epidermal hyperplasia and dermal mononuclear infiltrate.

Treatment modalities include surgical excision, cryotherapy, pharmacologic treatment, and combination therapy. Localized lesions often can be resected, but more severe infections can require pharmacologic treatment. Unfortunately, there tends to be a high risk for relapse with most antifungal modalities. The combination of itraconazole and terbinafine has been shown to offer the best medical therapy with lower risk for refractoriness to treatment by producing a synergistic effect between the 2 antifungals.^2,3 Many surgical treatments often are combined with oral antifungals to try to attain complete eradication in deep or extensive lesions, as seen in a case in which oral terbinafine was used prior to surgery to reduce the size of the lesion, followed by complete resection.⁴ With localized lesions that are resectable, a wide and deep incision often can be curative. Cryotherapy also may be coupled with surgical excision or pharmacologic therapy. Most literature suggests that cryotherapy or the use of antifungals prior to excision offers improved outcomes.^2,5 Prognosis tends to be good for chromoblastomycoses, particularly with smaller lesions. Complete eradication varies greatly on the size and depth of the lesion, independent of the causative pathogen.

Our patient’s presentation with chromoblastomycosis is unique because of the source of infection, which was a plant grown from seeds in a local nursery in South Florida and then sold to the patient. The majority of chromoblastomycosis infections occur in agricultural workers, typically in tropical climates such as South and Central America, the Caribbean, and Mexico.^1,2 Historically, infections in the United States have been uncommon, with the majority presenting in patients on prolonged corticosteroid therapy or with other immunosuppressive conditions.^6,7 This presentation of a chromoblastomycosis infection in a 69-year-old woman with no history of immunosuppression or chronic disease can serve as a teaching point about atypical presentations of the disease. The Madagascar palm plant that was responsible for the initial lesion in our case is a member of the Pachypodium species of plant that is endemic to Madagascar, one of the few regions outside of Latin America that has displayed numerous cases of chromoblastomycosis. In this fashion, a domestic gardener can now become exposed to dematiaceous pathogens that normally are not found in the continental United States, and knowledge of this possible exposure source can be crucial in the diagnosis and management of similar patients.

To the Editor:

A 69-year-old woman with no history of immunodeficiency presented 1 month after a thorn from her locally grown Madagascar palm plant (Pachypodium lamerei) pierced the skin. The patient developed a painful nodule at the site on the left elbow (Figure 1). An excisional biopsy by an outside dermatologist was performed, which showed granulomatous inflammation within the dermis with epidermal hyperplasia and the presence of golden brown spherules (medlar bodies). The diagnosis was a dermal fungal infection consistent with chromoblastomycosis. A curative surgical excision was performed, and medlar bodies were seen adjacent to a polarizable foreign body consistent with plant material on histology (Figure 2). Because the lesion was localized, adjuvant medical treatment was not deemed necessary. The patient has not had any recurrence in the last 1.5 years since the resection.

The categorization of chromoblastomycosis includes a chronic fungal infection of the cutaneous and subcutaneous tissues by dematiaceous (pigmented) fungi. This definition is such that there are a multitude of organisms that can be the primary cause of this diagnosis. Generally, infection follows a traumatic permeation of the skin by a foreign body contaminated by the causative organism in agricultural workers. The most common dematiaceous pathogens are Fonsecaea pedrosoi, Phialophora verrucosa, and Cladosporium carrionii; however, the specific causative organism varies heavily on geographic location. With inoculation by a foreign body, a small papule develops at the site of the lesion. Several years after the primary infection, nodules and verrucous erythematous plaques develop in the same area, and patients present with concerns of pain and pruritus.¹ Lesions usually are localized to the initial area of inoculation, generally a break in the skin by the offending foreign body, on the legs, arms, or hands, but hematogenous or lymphatic dissemination with distant transmission due to scratching also can occur. Ulceration due to secondary bacterial infection is another possible manifestation, resulting in a foul odor and less commonly lymphedema. Rarely, squamous cell carcinoma is a complication.²

RELATED ARTICLE: Fungal Foes: Presentations of Chromoblastomycosis Post–Hurricane Ike

On histopathology, thick-walled sclerotic bodies termed medlar bodies or copper pennies are pathognomonic for chromoblastomycosis and represent the fungal elements. Grossly, black dots can be seen on the skin in the affected areas from the transepidermal elimination of the fungi.^1,2 However, there is no specificity for determining the causative organism in this manner, or even with culture, as it is difficult to differentiate the species morphologically. More advanced tests can help, such as polymerase chain reaction or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, where available.² Hematoxylin and eosin stain also shows epidermal hyperplasia and dermal mononuclear infiltrate.

Treatment modalities include surgical excision, cryotherapy, pharmacologic treatment, and combination therapy. Localized lesions often can be resected, but more severe infections can require pharmacologic treatment. Unfortunately, there tends to be a high risk for relapse with most antifungal modalities. The combination of itraconazole and terbinafine has been shown to offer the best medical therapy with lower risk for refractoriness to treatment by producing a synergistic effect between the 2 antifungals.^2,3 Many surgical treatments often are combined with oral antifungals to try to attain complete eradication in deep or extensive lesions, as seen in a case in which oral terbinafine was used prior to surgery to reduce the size of the lesion, followed by complete resection.⁴ With localized lesions that are resectable, a wide and deep incision often can be curative. Cryotherapy also may be coupled with surgical excision or pharmacologic therapy. Most literature suggests that cryotherapy or the use of antifungals prior to excision offers improved outcomes.^2,5 Prognosis tends to be good for chromoblastomycoses, particularly with smaller lesions. Complete eradication varies greatly on the size and depth of the lesion, independent of the causative pathogen.

Our patient’s presentation with chromoblastomycosis is unique because of the source of infection, which was a plant grown from seeds in a local nursery in South Florida and then sold to the patient. The majority of chromoblastomycosis infections occur in agricultural workers, typically in tropical climates such as South and Central America, the Caribbean, and Mexico.^1,2 Historically, infections in the United States have been uncommon, with the majority presenting in patients on prolonged corticosteroid therapy or with other immunosuppressive conditions.^6,7 This presentation of a chromoblastomycosis infection in a 69-year-old woman with no history of immunosuppression or chronic disease can serve as a teaching point about atypical presentations of the disease. The Madagascar palm plant that was responsible for the initial lesion in our case is a member of the Pachypodium species of plant that is endemic to Madagascar, one of the few regions outside of Latin America that has displayed numerous cases of chromoblastomycosis. In this fashion, a domestic gardener can now become exposed to dematiaceous pathogens that normally are not found in the continental United States, and knowledge of this possible exposure source can be crucial in the diagnosis and management of similar patients.

To the Editor:

A 55-year-old man presented with hyperpigmented brown macules on the lips, hands, and fingertips of 6 years’ duration. The spots were persistent, asymptomatic, and had not changed in size. The patient denied a history of alopecia or dystrophic nails. He also denied a family history of similar skin findings. He had no personal history of cancer and a colonoscopy performed 5 years prior revealed no notable abnormalities. His medications included amlodipine and hydrocodone-acetaminophen. His mother died of “abdominal bleeding” at 74 years of age and his father died of a brain tumor at 64 years of age. Physical examination demonstrated numerous well-defined, dark brown macules of variable size distributed on the lower and upper mucosal lips (Figure 1A), buccal mucosa, hard palate, and gingiva, as well as the dorsal aspect of the fingers (Figure 1B) and volar aspect of the fingertips (Figure 1C).

A shave biopsy of a dark brown macule from the lower lip (Figure 2) was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed pigmentation of the basal layer of the epidermis with pigment-laden cells in the dermis immediately deep to the surface epithelium. Immunoperoxidase stains showed a normal number and distribution of melanocytes.

A diagnosis of Laugier-Hunziker syndrome (LHS) was made given the age of onset; distribution of pigmentation; and lack of pathologic colonoscopic findings, personal history of cancer, or gastrointestinal tract symptoms.

Benign hyperpigmentation of the lips and fingers has been reported.¹ The average age of onset of LHS is 52 years, and it typically is diagnosed in white adults.^1,2 In LHS, pigmentation is most commonly distributed on the lips, especially the lower lips and oral mucosa.² Pigmentation of the nails in the form of longitudinal melanonychia is present in approximately half of cases.^2,3 There also may be pigmentation of the neck; thorax; abdomen; and acral surfaces, especially the fingertips.^1-3 Rarely, pigmented macules can occur on the genitalia or sclera.^1,2 Unlike Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, the diagnosis of LHS does not result from a germline mutation and carries no risk of gastrointestinal polyposis or internal malignancy.^3,4 The histopathology of a pigmented macule of LHS shows a normal number and morphology of melanocytes. Epidermal basement membrane pigmentation is common, with pigment-laden macrophages evident in the papillary dermis.³

RELATED ARTICLE: Asymptomatic Lower Lip Hyperpigmentation From Laugier-Hunziker Syndrome

The differential diagnosis of multiple lentigines is broad and includes Peutz-Jeghers syndrome; LEOPARD (lentigines, electrocardiographic conduction abnormalities, ocular hypertelorism, pulmonary stenosis, abnormalities of genitalia, retardation of growth, deafness) syndrome; Carney complexes, including LAMB (lentigines, atrial myxoma, mucocutaneous myxoma, blue nevi) and NAME (nevi, atrial myxoma, myxoid neurofibroma, ephelide) syndromes⁵; primary adrenocortical insufficiency (Addison disease); and idiopathic melanoplakia^.2 Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, an autosomal-dominant syndrome with mucocutaneous lentigines, has a similar clinical appearance to LHS; therefore, it is necessary to exclude this diagnosis due to its association with intestinal hamartomatous polyps and internal malignancies (Table).^3,6,7

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is characterized by mucocutaneous hyperpigmentation and intestinal hamartomatous polyposis and is associated with internal malignancies of the colon, breast, pancreas, stomach, small intestines, ovaries, lung, and Sertoli cells in men.^6,7 Associated gastrointestinal tract malignancies in descending order of frequency are colon (39%), pancreatic (36%), gastric (29%), and small intestine (13%).¹ It is caused by a germ line mutation of the serine/threonine kinase 11 gene, STK11. Although the appearance and distribution of the mucocutaneous lentigines is similar to individuals with LHS, by contrast the lentiginosis in individuals with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is present from birth or develops during infancy.⁶ Aggressive cancer screening guidelines aid in early detection and begin at 8 years of age with a baseline colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy; future screening is dictated by the presence or absence of polyps. If no polyps are detected at 8 years of age, a colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy are repeated at 18 years of age and then every 3 years until 50 years of age.⁸

In an adult patient, the diagnosis of LHS can be made clinically and a correct diagnosis prevents frequent and unpleasant gastrointestinal tract cancer screening examinations. Lampe et al² described a man with LHS who was incorrectly diagnosed with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and experienced a colonic perforation as a complication of a screening colonoscopy. Their case report underscores the importance of making the correct diagnosis of LHS to avoid undertaking unnecessary aggressive cancer screening regimens.²

Although LHS is a benign condition that does not require treatment, Q-switched alexandrite or erbium:YAG laser therapy has been shown to improve the pigmentary findings associated with LHS.^9,10 It has been suggested that LHS should be renamed Laugier-Hunziker pigmentation² or mucocutaneous lentiginosis of Laugier and Hunziker¹ to differentiate LHS as simply a disorder of pigmentation rather than a potentially morbid genetic defect, as in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.

To the Editor:

A 55-year-old man presented with hyperpigmented brown macules on the lips, hands, and fingertips of 6 years’ duration. The spots were persistent, asymptomatic, and had not changed in size. The patient denied a history of alopecia or dystrophic nails. He also denied a family history of similar skin findings. He had no personal history of cancer and a colonoscopy performed 5 years prior revealed no notable abnormalities. His medications included amlodipine and hydrocodone-acetaminophen. His mother died of “abdominal bleeding” at 74 years of age and his father died of a brain tumor at 64 years of age. Physical examination demonstrated numerous well-defined, dark brown macules of variable size distributed on the lower and upper mucosal lips (Figure 1A), buccal mucosa, hard palate, and gingiva, as well as the dorsal aspect of the fingers (Figure 1B) and volar aspect of the fingertips (Figure 1C).

A shave biopsy of a dark brown macule from the lower lip (Figure 2) was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed pigmentation of the basal layer of the epidermis with pigment-laden cells in the dermis immediately deep to the surface epithelium. Immunoperoxidase stains showed a normal number and distribution of melanocytes.

A diagnosis of Laugier-Hunziker syndrome (LHS) was made given the age of onset; distribution of pigmentation; and lack of pathologic colonoscopic findings, personal history of cancer, or gastrointestinal tract symptoms.

Benign hyperpigmentation of the lips and fingers has been reported.¹ The average age of onset of LHS is 52 years, and it typically is diagnosed in white adults.^1,2 In LHS, pigmentation is most commonly distributed on the lips, especially the lower lips and oral mucosa.² Pigmentation of the nails in the form of longitudinal melanonychia is present in approximately half of cases.^2,3 There also may be pigmentation of the neck; thorax; abdomen; and acral surfaces, especially the fingertips.^1-3 Rarely, pigmented macules can occur on the genitalia or sclera.^1,2 Unlike Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, the diagnosis of LHS does not result from a germline mutation and carries no risk of gastrointestinal polyposis or internal malignancy.^3,4 The histopathology of a pigmented macule of LHS shows a normal number and morphology of melanocytes. Epidermal basement membrane pigmentation is common, with pigment-laden macrophages evident in the papillary dermis.³

RELATED ARTICLE: Asymptomatic Lower Lip Hyperpigmentation From Laugier-Hunziker Syndrome

The differential diagnosis of multiple lentigines is broad and includes Peutz-Jeghers syndrome; LEOPARD (lentigines, electrocardiographic conduction abnormalities, ocular hypertelorism, pulmonary stenosis, abnormalities of genitalia, retardation of growth, deafness) syndrome; Carney complexes, including LAMB (lentigines, atrial myxoma, mucocutaneous myxoma, blue nevi) and NAME (nevi, atrial myxoma, myxoid neurofibroma, ephelide) syndromes⁵; primary adrenocortical insufficiency (Addison disease); and idiopathic melanoplakia^.2 Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, an autosomal-dominant syndrome with mucocutaneous lentigines, has a similar clinical appearance to LHS; therefore, it is necessary to exclude this diagnosis due to its association with intestinal hamartomatous polyps and internal malignancies (Table).^3,6,7

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is characterized by mucocutaneous hyperpigmentation and intestinal hamartomatous polyposis and is associated with internal malignancies of the colon, breast, pancreas, stomach, small intestines, ovaries, lung, and Sertoli cells in men.^6,7 Associated gastrointestinal tract malignancies in descending order of frequency are colon (39%), pancreatic (36%), gastric (29%), and small intestine (13%).¹ It is caused by a germ line mutation of the serine/threonine kinase 11 gene, STK11. Although the appearance and distribution of the mucocutaneous lentigines is similar to individuals with LHS, by contrast the lentiginosis in individuals with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is present from birth or develops during infancy.⁶ Aggressive cancer screening guidelines aid in early detection and begin at 8 years of age with a baseline colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy; future screening is dictated by the presence or absence of polyps. If no polyps are detected at 8 years of age, a colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy are repeated at 18 years of age and then every 3 years until 50 years of age.⁸

In an adult patient, the diagnosis of LHS can be made clinically and a correct diagnosis prevents frequent and unpleasant gastrointestinal tract cancer screening examinations. Lampe et al² described a man with LHS who was incorrectly diagnosed with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and experienced a colonic perforation as a complication of a screening colonoscopy. Their case report underscores the importance of making the correct diagnosis of LHS to avoid undertaking unnecessary aggressive cancer screening regimens.²

Although LHS is a benign condition that does not require treatment, Q-switched alexandrite or erbium:YAG laser therapy has been shown to improve the pigmentary findings associated with LHS.^9,10 It has been suggested that LHS should be renamed Laugier-Hunziker pigmentation² or mucocutaneous lentiginosis of Laugier and Hunziker¹ to differentiate LHS as simply a disorder of pigmentation rather than a potentially morbid genetic defect, as in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.

To the Editor:

A 55-year-old man presented with hyperpigmented brown macules on the lips, hands, and fingertips of 6 years’ duration. The spots were persistent, asymptomatic, and had not changed in size. The patient denied a history of alopecia or dystrophic nails. He also denied a family history of similar skin findings. He had no personal history of cancer and a colonoscopy performed 5 years prior revealed no notable abnormalities. His medications included amlodipine and hydrocodone-acetaminophen. His mother died of “abdominal bleeding” at 74 years of age and his father died of a brain tumor at 64 years of age. Physical examination demonstrated numerous well-defined, dark brown macules of variable size distributed on the lower and upper mucosal lips (Figure 1A), buccal mucosa, hard palate, and gingiva, as well as the dorsal aspect of the fingers (Figure 1B) and volar aspect of the fingertips (Figure 1C).

A shave biopsy of a dark brown macule from the lower lip (Figure 2) was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed pigmentation of the basal layer of the epidermis with pigment-laden cells in the dermis immediately deep to the surface epithelium. Immunoperoxidase stains showed a normal number and distribution of melanocytes.

A diagnosis of Laugier-Hunziker syndrome (LHS) was made given the age of onset; distribution of pigmentation; and lack of pathologic colonoscopic findings, personal history of cancer, or gastrointestinal tract symptoms.

Benign hyperpigmentation of the lips and fingers has been reported.¹ The average age of onset of LHS is 52 years, and it typically is diagnosed in white adults.^1,2 In LHS, pigmentation is most commonly distributed on the lips, especially the lower lips and oral mucosa.² Pigmentation of the nails in the form of longitudinal melanonychia is present in approximately half of cases.^2,3 There also may be pigmentation of the neck; thorax; abdomen; and acral surfaces, especially the fingertips.^1-3 Rarely, pigmented macules can occur on the genitalia or sclera.^1,2 Unlike Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, the diagnosis of LHS does not result from a germline mutation and carries no risk of gastrointestinal polyposis or internal malignancy.^3,4 The histopathology of a pigmented macule of LHS shows a normal number and morphology of melanocytes. Epidermal basement membrane pigmentation is common, with pigment-laden macrophages evident in the papillary dermis.³

RELATED ARTICLE: Asymptomatic Lower Lip Hyperpigmentation From Laugier-Hunziker Syndrome

The differential diagnosis of multiple lentigines is broad and includes Peutz-Jeghers syndrome; LEOPARD (lentigines, electrocardiographic conduction abnormalities, ocular hypertelorism, pulmonary stenosis, abnormalities of genitalia, retardation of growth, deafness) syndrome; Carney complexes, including LAMB (lentigines, atrial myxoma, mucocutaneous myxoma, blue nevi) and NAME (nevi, atrial myxoma, myxoid neurofibroma, ephelide) syndromes⁵; primary adrenocortical insufficiency (Addison disease); and idiopathic melanoplakia^.2 Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, an autosomal-dominant syndrome with mucocutaneous lentigines, has a similar clinical appearance to LHS; therefore, it is necessary to exclude this diagnosis due to its association with intestinal hamartomatous polyps and internal malignancies (Table).^3,6,7

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is characterized by mucocutaneous hyperpigmentation and intestinal hamartomatous polyposis and is associated with internal malignancies of the colon, breast, pancreas, stomach, small intestines, ovaries, lung, and Sertoli cells in men.^6,7 Associated gastrointestinal tract malignancies in descending order of frequency are colon (39%), pancreatic (36%), gastric (29%), and small intestine (13%).¹ It is caused by a germ line mutation of the serine/threonine kinase 11 gene, STK11. Although the appearance and distribution of the mucocutaneous lentigines is similar to individuals with LHS, by contrast the lentiginosis in individuals with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is present from birth or develops during infancy.⁶ Aggressive cancer screening guidelines aid in early detection and begin at 8 years of age with a baseline colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy; future screening is dictated by the presence or absence of polyps. If no polyps are detected at 8 years of age, a colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy are repeated at 18 years of age and then every 3 years until 50 years of age.⁸

In an adult patient, the diagnosis of LHS can be made clinically and a correct diagnosis prevents frequent and unpleasant gastrointestinal tract cancer screening examinations. Lampe et al² described a man with LHS who was incorrectly diagnosed with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and experienced a colonic perforation as a complication of a screening colonoscopy. Their case report underscores the importance of making the correct diagnosis of LHS to avoid undertaking unnecessary aggressive cancer screening regimens.²

Although LHS is a benign condition that does not require treatment, Q-switched alexandrite or erbium:YAG laser therapy has been shown to improve the pigmentary findings associated with LHS.^9,10 It has been suggested that LHS should be renamed Laugier-Hunziker pigmentation² or mucocutaneous lentiginosis of Laugier and Hunziker¹ to differentiate LHS as simply a disorder of pigmentation rather than a potentially morbid genetic defect, as in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.