Case Reports

THE CASE

A 4-year-old girl presented to her pediatrician with genital discomfort and dysuria of 6 months’ duration. The patient’s mother said that 3 days earlier, she noticed a tear near the child’s clitoris and a scab on the labia minora that the mother attributed to minor trauma from scratching. The pediatrician was concerned about genital trauma from sexual abuse and referred the patient to the emergency department, where a report with child protective services (CPS) was filed. The mother reported that the patient and her 8-year-old sibling spent 3 to 4 hours a day with a babysitter, who was always supervised, and the parents had no concerns about possible sexual abuse.

Physical examination by our institution’s Child Protection Team revealed clitoral hood swelling with subepithelial hemorrhages, a blood blister on the right labia minora, a fissure and subepithelial hemorrhages on the posterior fourchette, and a thin depigmented figure-of-eight lesion around the vulva and anus.

THE DIAGNOSIS

Since the clinical findings were consistent with prepubertal lichen sclerosus (LS), the CPS case was closed and the patient was referred to Pediatric Gynecology. Treatment with high-potency topical steroids was initiated with clobetasol ointment 0.05% twice daily for 2 weeks, then once daily for 2 weeks. She was then switched to triamcinolone ointment 0.01% twice daily for 2 weeks, then once daily for 2 weeks. These treatments were enough to stop the LS flare and decrease the anogenital itching.

DISCUSSION

Lichen sclerosus is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that primarily presents in the anogenital region; however, extragenital lesions on the upper extremities, thighs, and breasts have been reported in 15% to 20% of patients.¹ Lichen sclerosus most commonly affects females as a result of low estrogen and may occur during puberty or following menopause, but it also is seen in males.^1,2 The estimated prevalence of LS in prepubertal girls is 1 in 900.³ The effects of increased estrogen exposure on LS during puberty are not entirely clear. Lichen sclerosus previously was thought to improve with puberty, since it is not as common in women of reproductive age; however, studies have shown persistent symptoms after menarche in some patients.^4-6

The pathogenesis of LS is multifactorial, likely with an autoimmune component, as it often is associated with other autoimmune findings such as thyroiditis, alopecia, pernicious anemia, and vitiligo.² Diagnosis of prepubertal LS usually is made based on a review of the patient’s history and clinical examination. Presenting symptoms may include pruritus, skin irritation, vulvar pain, dysuria, bleeding from excoriations, fissures, and constipation.^1,3,7

On physical examination, LS can present on the anogenital skin as smooth white spots or wrinkled, blotchy, atrophic patches. The skin around the vaginal opening and anus is thin and often is described as resembling parchment or cigarette paper in a figure-of-eight pattern (FIGURE 1A). Vulvar and anal fissures and subepithelial hemorrhages with the appearance of blood blisters also can be found (FIGURE 1B).⁸ Affected areas are fragile and susceptible to minor trauma, which may result in bruising or bleeding (FIGURE 1C).

Over time, scarring can occur and may result in disruption of the anogenital architecture—specifically loss of the labia minora, narrowing of the introitus, and burying of the clitoris.^1,2 These changes can be similar to the scarring seen in postmenopausal women with LS.

Continue to: The differential diagnosis...

The differential diagnosis for prepubertal LS includes vitiligo, lichen planus, lichen simplex chronicus, psoriasis, eczema, vulvovaginitis, contact dermatitis, and trauma.^2,7 On average, it takes 1 to 2 years after onset of symptoms before a correct diagnosis of prepubertal LS is made, and trauma and/or sexual abuse often are first suspected.^7,9 For clinicians who are unfamiliar with prepubertal LS, the clinical findings of anogenital bruising and bleeding understandably may be suggestive of abuse. It is important to note that diagnosis of LS does not preclude the possibility of sexual abuse; in some cases, LS can be triggered or exacerbated by anogenital trauma, known as the Koebner phenomenon.²

Treatment. After the diagnosis of prepubertal LS is established, the goals of treatment are to provide symptom relief and prevent scarring of the external genitalia. To our knowledge, there have been no randomized controlled trials for treatment of LS in prepubertal girls. In general, acute symptoms are treated with high-potency topical steroids, such as clobetasol propionate or betamethasone valerate, and treatment regimens are variable.⁷

LS has an unpredictable clinical course and there often are recurrences that require repeat courses of topical steroids.⁹ Since concurrent bacterial infection is common,¹⁰ genital cultures should be obtained prior to initiation of topical steroids if an infection is suspected.

Diagnosis of lichen sclerosus should not preclude screening for sexual abuse, as symptoms can be triggered or exacerbated by trauma to the area.

Topical calcineurin inhibitors have been used successfully, but proof of their effectiveness is limited to case reports in the literature.⁷ Surgical treatment of LS typically is reserved for complications associated with symptomatic adhesions that are refractory to medical management.^7,11 Vulvar hygiene is paramount to symptom control, and topical emollients can be used to manage minor irritation.^7,8 In our patient, clobetasol and triamcinolone ointments were enough to stop the LS flare and decrease the anogenital itching.

THE TAKEAWAY

Although LS has very characteristic skin findings, the diagnosis continues to be challenging for physicians who are unfamiliar with this condition. Failure to recognize prepubertal LS not only delays diagnosis and treatment but also may lead to repeated genital examinations and investigation by CPS for suspected sexual abuse. As with any genital complaint in a prepubertal girl, diagnosis of LS should not preclude appropriate screening for sexual abuse. Although providers should be vigilant about potential sexual abuse, familiarity with skin conditions that mimic genital trauma is essential.

CORRESPONDENCE
Monica Rosen, MD, L4000 Women’s Hospital, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5276 Ann Arbor, MI 48109; [email protected]

THE CASE

A 4-year-old girl presented to her pediatrician with genital discomfort and dysuria of 6 months’ duration. The patient’s mother said that 3 days earlier, she noticed a tear near the child’s clitoris and a scab on the labia minora that the mother attributed to minor trauma from scratching. The pediatrician was concerned about genital trauma from sexual abuse and referred the patient to the emergency department, where a report with child protective services (CPS) was filed. The mother reported that the patient and her 8-year-old sibling spent 3 to 4 hours a day with a babysitter, who was always supervised, and the parents had no concerns about possible sexual abuse.

Physical examination by our institution’s Child Protection Team revealed clitoral hood swelling with subepithelial hemorrhages, a blood blister on the right labia minora, a fissure and subepithelial hemorrhages on the posterior fourchette, and a thin depigmented figure-of-eight lesion around the vulva and anus.

THE DIAGNOSIS

Since the clinical findings were consistent with prepubertal lichen sclerosus (LS), the CPS case was closed and the patient was referred to Pediatric Gynecology. Treatment with high-potency topical steroids was initiated with clobetasol ointment 0.05% twice daily for 2 weeks, then once daily for 2 weeks. She was then switched to triamcinolone ointment 0.01% twice daily for 2 weeks, then once daily for 2 weeks. These treatments were enough to stop the LS flare and decrease the anogenital itching.

DISCUSSION

Lichen sclerosus is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that primarily presents in the anogenital region; however, extragenital lesions on the upper extremities, thighs, and breasts have been reported in 15% to 20% of patients.¹ Lichen sclerosus most commonly affects females as a result of low estrogen and may occur during puberty or following menopause, but it also is seen in males.^1,2 The estimated prevalence of LS in prepubertal girls is 1 in 900.³ The effects of increased estrogen exposure on LS during puberty are not entirely clear. Lichen sclerosus previously was thought to improve with puberty, since it is not as common in women of reproductive age; however, studies have shown persistent symptoms after menarche in some patients.^4-6

The pathogenesis of LS is multifactorial, likely with an autoimmune component, as it often is associated with other autoimmune findings such as thyroiditis, alopecia, pernicious anemia, and vitiligo.² Diagnosis of prepubertal LS usually is made based on a review of the patient’s history and clinical examination. Presenting symptoms may include pruritus, skin irritation, vulvar pain, dysuria, bleeding from excoriations, fissures, and constipation.^1,3,7

On physical examination, LS can present on the anogenital skin as smooth white spots or wrinkled, blotchy, atrophic patches. The skin around the vaginal opening and anus is thin and often is described as resembling parchment or cigarette paper in a figure-of-eight pattern (FIGURE 1A). Vulvar and anal fissures and subepithelial hemorrhages with the appearance of blood blisters also can be found (FIGURE 1B).⁸ Affected areas are fragile and susceptible to minor trauma, which may result in bruising or bleeding (FIGURE 1C).

Over time, scarring can occur and may result in disruption of the anogenital architecture—specifically loss of the labia minora, narrowing of the introitus, and burying of the clitoris.^1,2 These changes can be similar to the scarring seen in postmenopausal women with LS.

Continue to: The differential diagnosis...

The differential diagnosis for prepubertal LS includes vitiligo, lichen planus, lichen simplex chronicus, psoriasis, eczema, vulvovaginitis, contact dermatitis, and trauma.^2,7 On average, it takes 1 to 2 years after onset of symptoms before a correct diagnosis of prepubertal LS is made, and trauma and/or sexual abuse often are first suspected.^7,9 For clinicians who are unfamiliar with prepubertal LS, the clinical findings of anogenital bruising and bleeding understandably may be suggestive of abuse. It is important to note that diagnosis of LS does not preclude the possibility of sexual abuse; in some cases, LS can be triggered or exacerbated by anogenital trauma, known as the Koebner phenomenon.²

Treatment. After the diagnosis of prepubertal LS is established, the goals of treatment are to provide symptom relief and prevent scarring of the external genitalia. To our knowledge, there have been no randomized controlled trials for treatment of LS in prepubertal girls. In general, acute symptoms are treated with high-potency topical steroids, such as clobetasol propionate or betamethasone valerate, and treatment regimens are variable.⁷

LS has an unpredictable clinical course and there often are recurrences that require repeat courses of topical steroids.⁹ Since concurrent bacterial infection is common,¹⁰ genital cultures should be obtained prior to initiation of topical steroids if an infection is suspected.

Diagnosis of lichen sclerosus should not preclude screening for sexual abuse, as symptoms can be triggered or exacerbated by trauma to the area.

Topical calcineurin inhibitors have been used successfully, but proof of their effectiveness is limited to case reports in the literature.⁷ Surgical treatment of LS typically is reserved for complications associated with symptomatic adhesions that are refractory to medical management.^7,11 Vulvar hygiene is paramount to symptom control, and topical emollients can be used to manage minor irritation.^7,8 In our patient, clobetasol and triamcinolone ointments were enough to stop the LS flare and decrease the anogenital itching.

THE TAKEAWAY

Although LS has very characteristic skin findings, the diagnosis continues to be challenging for physicians who are unfamiliar with this condition. Failure to recognize prepubertal LS not only delays diagnosis and treatment but also may lead to repeated genital examinations and investigation by CPS for suspected sexual abuse. As with any genital complaint in a prepubertal girl, diagnosis of LS should not preclude appropriate screening for sexual abuse. Although providers should be vigilant about potential sexual abuse, familiarity with skin conditions that mimic genital trauma is essential.

CORRESPONDENCE
Monica Rosen, MD, L4000 Women’s Hospital, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5276 Ann Arbor, MI 48109; [email protected]

THE CASE

A 4-year-old girl presented to her pediatrician with genital discomfort and dysuria of 6 months’ duration. The patient’s mother said that 3 days earlier, she noticed a tear near the child’s clitoris and a scab on the labia minora that the mother attributed to minor trauma from scratching. The pediatrician was concerned about genital trauma from sexual abuse and referred the patient to the emergency department, where a report with child protective services (CPS) was filed. The mother reported that the patient and her 8-year-old sibling spent 3 to 4 hours a day with a babysitter, who was always supervised, and the parents had no concerns about possible sexual abuse.

Physical examination by our institution’s Child Protection Team revealed clitoral hood swelling with subepithelial hemorrhages, a blood blister on the right labia minora, a fissure and subepithelial hemorrhages on the posterior fourchette, and a thin depigmented figure-of-eight lesion around the vulva and anus.

THE DIAGNOSIS

Since the clinical findings were consistent with prepubertal lichen sclerosus (LS), the CPS case was closed and the patient was referred to Pediatric Gynecology. Treatment with high-potency topical steroids was initiated with clobetasol ointment 0.05% twice daily for 2 weeks, then once daily for 2 weeks. She was then switched to triamcinolone ointment 0.01% twice daily for 2 weeks, then once daily for 2 weeks. These treatments were enough to stop the LS flare and decrease the anogenital itching.

DISCUSSION

Lichen sclerosus is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that primarily presents in the anogenital region; however, extragenital lesions on the upper extremities, thighs, and breasts have been reported in 15% to 20% of patients.¹ Lichen sclerosus most commonly affects females as a result of low estrogen and may occur during puberty or following menopause, but it also is seen in males.^1,2 The estimated prevalence of LS in prepubertal girls is 1 in 900.³ The effects of increased estrogen exposure on LS during puberty are not entirely clear. Lichen sclerosus previously was thought to improve with puberty, since it is not as common in women of reproductive age; however, studies have shown persistent symptoms after menarche in some patients.^4-6

The pathogenesis of LS is multifactorial, likely with an autoimmune component, as it often is associated with other autoimmune findings such as thyroiditis, alopecia, pernicious anemia, and vitiligo.² Diagnosis of prepubertal LS usually is made based on a review of the patient’s history and clinical examination. Presenting symptoms may include pruritus, skin irritation, vulvar pain, dysuria, bleeding from excoriations, fissures, and constipation.^1,3,7

On physical examination, LS can present on the anogenital skin as smooth white spots or wrinkled, blotchy, atrophic patches. The skin around the vaginal opening and anus is thin and often is described as resembling parchment or cigarette paper in a figure-of-eight pattern (FIGURE 1A). Vulvar and anal fissures and subepithelial hemorrhages with the appearance of blood blisters also can be found (FIGURE 1B).⁸ Affected areas are fragile and susceptible to minor trauma, which may result in bruising or bleeding (FIGURE 1C).

Over time, scarring can occur and may result in disruption of the anogenital architecture—specifically loss of the labia minora, narrowing of the introitus, and burying of the clitoris.^1,2 These changes can be similar to the scarring seen in postmenopausal women with LS.

Continue to: The differential diagnosis...

The differential diagnosis for prepubertal LS includes vitiligo, lichen planus, lichen simplex chronicus, psoriasis, eczema, vulvovaginitis, contact dermatitis, and trauma.^2,7 On average, it takes 1 to 2 years after onset of symptoms before a correct diagnosis of prepubertal LS is made, and trauma and/or sexual abuse often are first suspected.^7,9 For clinicians who are unfamiliar with prepubertal LS, the clinical findings of anogenital bruising and bleeding understandably may be suggestive of abuse. It is important to note that diagnosis of LS does not preclude the possibility of sexual abuse; in some cases, LS can be triggered or exacerbated by anogenital trauma, known as the Koebner phenomenon.²

Treatment. After the diagnosis of prepubertal LS is established, the goals of treatment are to provide symptom relief and prevent scarring of the external genitalia. To our knowledge, there have been no randomized controlled trials for treatment of LS in prepubertal girls. In general, acute symptoms are treated with high-potency topical steroids, such as clobetasol propionate or betamethasone valerate, and treatment regimens are variable.⁷

LS has an unpredictable clinical course and there often are recurrences that require repeat courses of topical steroids.⁹ Since concurrent bacterial infection is common,¹⁰ genital cultures should be obtained prior to initiation of topical steroids if an infection is suspected.

Diagnosis of lichen sclerosus should not preclude screening for sexual abuse, as symptoms can be triggered or exacerbated by trauma to the area.

Topical calcineurin inhibitors have been used successfully, but proof of their effectiveness is limited to case reports in the literature.⁷ Surgical treatment of LS typically is reserved for complications associated with symptomatic adhesions that are refractory to medical management.^7,11 Vulvar hygiene is paramount to symptom control, and topical emollients can be used to manage minor irritation.^7,8 In our patient, clobetasol and triamcinolone ointments were enough to stop the LS flare and decrease the anogenital itching.

THE TAKEAWAY

Although LS has very characteristic skin findings, the diagnosis continues to be challenging for physicians who are unfamiliar with this condition. Failure to recognize prepubertal LS not only delays diagnosis and treatment but also may lead to repeated genital examinations and investigation by CPS for suspected sexual abuse. As with any genital complaint in a prepubertal girl, diagnosis of LS should not preclude appropriate screening for sexual abuse. Although providers should be vigilant about potential sexual abuse, familiarity with skin conditions that mimic genital trauma is essential.

CORRESPONDENCE
Monica Rosen, MD, L4000 Women’s Hospital, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5276 Ann Arbor, MI 48109; [email protected]

CASE 1

Two days after reviving her boyfriend with naloxone, a woman and her 30-year-old boyfriend presented to our family medicine clinic. They explained that he had injected heroin and shortly thereafter he stopped breathing and his lips turned blue. The patient’s girlfriend did not call emergency medical services (EMS) at the time because she was afraid of getting arrested due to past incarceration for possession of illegal drugs. Instead, she revived him with naloxone that she found in his bag.

Both the patient and his girlfriend were scared and surprised by his “terrible reaction,” as he had previously purchased heroin from the same dealer and used the same dose without similar effects. However, the patient did note that the drug he purchased this time had a bright white tinge, when normally the drug was light yellow.

On physical examination, the patient’s heart rate and blood pressure were normal. There were needle track marks on both forearms, elbows, and upper arms. A laboratory workup obtained during this visit revealed anemia and a normal basic metabolic panel. A hepatitis C virus antibody test was positive, and a hepatic function panel revealed elevated transaminase levels. Urine toxicology was positive for opioids and negative for other substances.

CASE 2

A 58-year-old man with a history of chronic hepatitis C, polysubstance abuse, and schizophrenia was transported to the emergency department by EMS after his family found him unresponsive in his bedroom. The patient had agonal breathing when EMS arrived, so they administered naloxone (4 mg intranasal and 4 mg intravenous). His breathing improved, but his mental status did not. He was still obtunded upon arrival in the emergency department and vomited 4 tan-colored patches. The patient was tachycardic (heart rate, 108 beats/min), hypertensive (blood pressure, 189/95 mm Hg), and had rapid shallow breathing (respiratory rate, 38 breaths/min). He was intubated for airway protection, at which time 2 more tan-colored patches were removed from his pharynx.

Laboratory evaluation revealed an acute kidney injury with a high anion metabolic acidosis. A hepatic function panel showed elevated transaminase levels. Plasma acetaminophen and salicylate levels were normal. A computed tomography head scan was normal. Urine toxicology was negative for opioids but was positive for cocaine and benzodiazepines.

THE DIAGNOSIS

Opioid overdose caused the acute respiratory depression in both cases. In Case 1, the patient unknowingly overdosed on heroin laced with fentanyl, known as China White, which likely caused the drug’s bright white tinge. In Case 2, the patient’s overdose was the result of oral ingestion of fentanyl patches. (Limited urine toxicology was negative for opiates because fentanyl is a fully synthetic opioid that shows up only with a specific or extended assay. More on this in a bit.)

DISCUSSION

The fatal drug overdose epidemic in the United States is growing. From 2000 to 2014, the mortality rate from drug overdose increased by 137%, including a 200% increase in the rate of overdose deaths related to opioids (ie, pain medications, heroin).¹ Between 2013 and 2014, the age-adjusted mortality rate related to methadone, a synthetic opioid, remained unchanged; however, age-adjusted mortality rates related to natural and semisynthetic opioid pain medications, heroin, and synthetic opioids other than methadone (eg, fentanyl) increased by 9%, 26%, and 80%, respectively. In 2014, a sharp increase in overdose deaths related to synthetic opioids other than methadone coincided with law enforcement reports of increased availability of illegal fentanyl; however, the toxicology panel used by coroners and medical examiners at that time could not distinguish between illegal and prescription fentanyl.¹

Continue to: Among 70,237 drug overdose deaths...

Among 70,237 drug overdose deaths in the United States in 2017, 47,600 (67.8%) involved an opioid. From 2013 to 2017, drug overdose death rates increased in 35 of 50 states and the District of Columbia, and significant increases in death rates involving synthetic opioids occurred in 15 out of 20 states, likely driven by illicitly manufactured fentanyl.²

Fentanyl-laced heroin: More common, but not new

In October 1991, 3-methylfentanyl was identified in 16 fatal drug overdoses in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, contributing to a 4-fold increase in overdose deaths compared to the previous year. Fentanyl mixed with heroin and other drugs is commonly found in the Midwest, Northeast, and Southern regions of the United States; in 2014, more than 80% of fentanyl confiscations occurred in 10 states within these regions, with the highest incidence occurring in Ohio.³

When combined with fentanyl, heroin becomes 50 to 100 times more potent, resulting in a subjective high with exaggerated central nervous system depression manifesting as lethargy, miosis, and respiratory depression.⁴ Most drug users are unaware and unable to identify when heroin is laced with fentanyl, which may contribute to the rise in deaths from unintentional drug overdose.^1,5,6

Oral abuse of fentanyl patches can be fatal

Heroin is 50 to 100 times more potent when combined with fentanyl.

Outcomes from oral abuse of fentanyl patches have ranged from transient overdose symptoms, such as lethargy and respiratory depression, to death.^7-9 When administered in a medical setting, transbuccal fentanyl has a bioavailability of 50% to 65% across the buccal membrane. Nearly 20% of the drug escapes hepatic first pass metabolism when fentanyl patches are ingested orally and enters the systemic circulation, resulting in severe overdose and potentially death. Prolonged chewing and sucking on fentanyl patches increases the contact time with the buccal membrane, resulting in increased systemic absorption compared to oral ingestion without chewing/sucking.^7-9

Urine toxicology screening detects compounds based on a chemical assay for drugs—generally codeine, morphine, and their metabolites. Because fentanyl is a fully synthetic opioid, its structure is not like morphine or codeine. Therefore, fentanyl could not be detected on traditional urine toxicology screens for opiates. To detect the fentanyl, a urine drug screen would need an assay exclusively for fentanyl or its metabolite, norfentanyl.¹⁰ The fentanyl specific assay is increasingly available as part of commercially available, extended-panel urine toxicology testing.¹¹

Continue to: Survival of fentanyl overdose depends on naloxone availability

 

 

Survival of fentanyl overdose depends on naloxone availability

Naloxone is a safe and effective antidote to an opioid overdose. It comes in 3 preparations, including intramuscular and subcutaneous injections and an intranasal spray.¹² Concerns that naloxone will harm patients with opioid dependence are unfounded. Naloxone can induce symptoms of opioid withdrawal, such as yawning, lacrimation, piloerection, diaphoresis, myalgia, vomiting, and diarrhea. While these withdrawal symptoms are unpleasant, they are not life threatening.¹² Due to its high potency, large doses of naloxone (ie, 4–16 mg) are required to reverse the effects of a fentanyl overdose.¹³ Intranasal naloxone hydrochloride 4 mg delivered in a single spray is preferred due to the ease of administration. Repeat doses may be necessary if respiratory depression continues or recurs prior to the arrival of emergency medical services. Increasing the availability of naloxone to first responders has the potential to save many lives.⁶

THE TAKEAWAY

Fentanyl is a major contributor to the growing drug overdose crisis in the United States. When laced with heroin or consumed orally in the form of transdermal patches, fentanyl becomes more potent and is increasingly fatal. It’s crucial that primary care physicians be able to identify and educate at-risk patients about the fatal consequences of fentanyl overdose and coordinate care to help get them into an appropriate rehabilitation program.

In order to quickly recognize the signs of fentanyl-related overdose, it’s important to be alert for this possibility. At the bedside, the most easily recognized abnormality associated with fentanyl or other opioid overdose is a decline in respiratory rate culminating in apnea.¹⁰ A respiratory rate of 12 breaths/min or less in a patient who is not in physiologic sleep strongly suggests acute opioid intoxication, particularly when accompanied by miosis or stupor. Other signs include bradycardia, hypotension, and seizures from anoxia.¹⁰

Naloxone is a safe and effective antidote that is critical to the prevention of fatal opioid overdoses.

Apart from the severity of symptoms, it is hard to clinically distinguish fentanyl overdose from other opiate overdose incidents. Given the degree to which illegal opiates are contaminated with fentanyl in the United States,³ it is appropriate to screen for fentanyl with extended panel urine toxicology testing in patients with suspected opioid overdose.

CORRESPONDENCE
Jaividhya Dasarathy, MD, 2500 MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44109; [email protected]

CASE 1

Two days after reviving her boyfriend with naloxone, a woman and her 30-year-old boyfriend presented to our family medicine clinic. They explained that he had injected heroin and shortly thereafter he stopped breathing and his lips turned blue. The patient’s girlfriend did not call emergency medical services (EMS) at the time because she was afraid of getting arrested due to past incarceration for possession of illegal drugs. Instead, she revived him with naloxone that she found in his bag.

Both the patient and his girlfriend were scared and surprised by his “terrible reaction,” as he had previously purchased heroin from the same dealer and used the same dose without similar effects. However, the patient did note that the drug he purchased this time had a bright white tinge, when normally the drug was light yellow.

On physical examination, the patient’s heart rate and blood pressure were normal. There were needle track marks on both forearms, elbows, and upper arms. A laboratory workup obtained during this visit revealed anemia and a normal basic metabolic panel. A hepatitis C virus antibody test was positive, and a hepatic function panel revealed elevated transaminase levels. Urine toxicology was positive for opioids and negative for other substances.

CASE 2

A 58-year-old man with a history of chronic hepatitis C, polysubstance abuse, and schizophrenia was transported to the emergency department by EMS after his family found him unresponsive in his bedroom. The patient had agonal breathing when EMS arrived, so they administered naloxone (4 mg intranasal and 4 mg intravenous). His breathing improved, but his mental status did not. He was still obtunded upon arrival in the emergency department and vomited 4 tan-colored patches. The patient was tachycardic (heart rate, 108 beats/min), hypertensive (blood pressure, 189/95 mm Hg), and had rapid shallow breathing (respiratory rate, 38 breaths/min). He was intubated for airway protection, at which time 2 more tan-colored patches were removed from his pharynx.

Laboratory evaluation revealed an acute kidney injury with a high anion metabolic acidosis. A hepatic function panel showed elevated transaminase levels. Plasma acetaminophen and salicylate levels were normal. A computed tomography head scan was normal. Urine toxicology was negative for opioids but was positive for cocaine and benzodiazepines.

THE DIAGNOSIS

Opioid overdose caused the acute respiratory depression in both cases. In Case 1, the patient unknowingly overdosed on heroin laced with fentanyl, known as China White, which likely caused the drug’s bright white tinge. In Case 2, the patient’s overdose was the result of oral ingestion of fentanyl patches. (Limited urine toxicology was negative for opiates because fentanyl is a fully synthetic opioid that shows up only with a specific or extended assay. More on this in a bit.)

DISCUSSION

The fatal drug overdose epidemic in the United States is growing. From 2000 to 2014, the mortality rate from drug overdose increased by 137%, including a 200% increase in the rate of overdose deaths related to opioids (ie, pain medications, heroin).¹ Between 2013 and 2014, the age-adjusted mortality rate related to methadone, a synthetic opioid, remained unchanged; however, age-adjusted mortality rates related to natural and semisynthetic opioid pain medications, heroin, and synthetic opioids other than methadone (eg, fentanyl) increased by 9%, 26%, and 80%, respectively. In 2014, a sharp increase in overdose deaths related to synthetic opioids other than methadone coincided with law enforcement reports of increased availability of illegal fentanyl; however, the toxicology panel used by coroners and medical examiners at that time could not distinguish between illegal and prescription fentanyl.¹

Continue to: Among 70,237 drug overdose deaths...

Among 70,237 drug overdose deaths in the United States in 2017, 47,600 (67.8%) involved an opioid. From 2013 to 2017, drug overdose death rates increased in 35 of 50 states and the District of Columbia, and significant increases in death rates involving synthetic opioids occurred in 15 out of 20 states, likely driven by illicitly manufactured fentanyl.²

Fentanyl-laced heroin: More common, but not new

In October 1991, 3-methylfentanyl was identified in 16 fatal drug overdoses in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, contributing to a 4-fold increase in overdose deaths compared to the previous year. Fentanyl mixed with heroin and other drugs is commonly found in the Midwest, Northeast, and Southern regions of the United States; in 2014, more than 80% of fentanyl confiscations occurred in 10 states within these regions, with the highest incidence occurring in Ohio.³

When combined with fentanyl, heroin becomes 50 to 100 times more potent, resulting in a subjective high with exaggerated central nervous system depression manifesting as lethargy, miosis, and respiratory depression.⁴ Most drug users are unaware and unable to identify when heroin is laced with fentanyl, which may contribute to the rise in deaths from unintentional drug overdose.^1,5,6

Oral abuse of fentanyl patches can be fatal

Heroin is 50 to 100 times more potent when combined with fentanyl.

Outcomes from oral abuse of fentanyl patches have ranged from transient overdose symptoms, such as lethargy and respiratory depression, to death.^7-9 When administered in a medical setting, transbuccal fentanyl has a bioavailability of 50% to 65% across the buccal membrane. Nearly 20% of the drug escapes hepatic first pass metabolism when fentanyl patches are ingested orally and enters the systemic circulation, resulting in severe overdose and potentially death. Prolonged chewing and sucking on fentanyl patches increases the contact time with the buccal membrane, resulting in increased systemic absorption compared to oral ingestion without chewing/sucking.^7-9

Urine toxicology screening detects compounds based on a chemical assay for drugs—generally codeine, morphine, and their metabolites. Because fentanyl is a fully synthetic opioid, its structure is not like morphine or codeine. Therefore, fentanyl could not be detected on traditional urine toxicology screens for opiates. To detect the fentanyl, a urine drug screen would need an assay exclusively for fentanyl or its metabolite, norfentanyl.¹⁰ The fentanyl specific assay is increasingly available as part of commercially available, extended-panel urine toxicology testing.¹¹

Continue to: Survival of fentanyl overdose depends on naloxone availability

 

 

Survival of fentanyl overdose depends on naloxone availability

Naloxone is a safe and effective antidote to an opioid overdose. It comes in 3 preparations, including intramuscular and subcutaneous injections and an intranasal spray.¹² Concerns that naloxone will harm patients with opioid dependence are unfounded. Naloxone can induce symptoms of opioid withdrawal, such as yawning, lacrimation, piloerection, diaphoresis, myalgia, vomiting, and diarrhea. While these withdrawal symptoms are unpleasant, they are not life threatening.¹² Due to its high potency, large doses of naloxone (ie, 4–16 mg) are required to reverse the effects of a fentanyl overdose.¹³ Intranasal naloxone hydrochloride 4 mg delivered in a single spray is preferred due to the ease of administration. Repeat doses may be necessary if respiratory depression continues or recurs prior to the arrival of emergency medical services. Increasing the availability of naloxone to first responders has the potential to save many lives.⁶

THE TAKEAWAY

Fentanyl is a major contributor to the growing drug overdose crisis in the United States. When laced with heroin or consumed orally in the form of transdermal patches, fentanyl becomes more potent and is increasingly fatal. It’s crucial that primary care physicians be able to identify and educate at-risk patients about the fatal consequences of fentanyl overdose and coordinate care to help get them into an appropriate rehabilitation program.

In order to quickly recognize the signs of fentanyl-related overdose, it’s important to be alert for this possibility. At the bedside, the most easily recognized abnormality associated with fentanyl or other opioid overdose is a decline in respiratory rate culminating in apnea.¹⁰ A respiratory rate of 12 breaths/min or less in a patient who is not in physiologic sleep strongly suggests acute opioid intoxication, particularly when accompanied by miosis or stupor. Other signs include bradycardia, hypotension, and seizures from anoxia.¹⁰

Naloxone is a safe and effective antidote that is critical to the prevention of fatal opioid overdoses.

Apart from the severity of symptoms, it is hard to clinically distinguish fentanyl overdose from other opiate overdose incidents. Given the degree to which illegal opiates are contaminated with fentanyl in the United States,³ it is appropriate to screen for fentanyl with extended panel urine toxicology testing in patients with suspected opioid overdose.

CORRESPONDENCE
Jaividhya Dasarathy, MD, 2500 MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44109; [email protected]

CASE 1

Two days after reviving her boyfriend with naloxone, a woman and her 30-year-old boyfriend presented to our family medicine clinic. They explained that he had injected heroin and shortly thereafter he stopped breathing and his lips turned blue. The patient’s girlfriend did not call emergency medical services (EMS) at the time because she was afraid of getting arrested due to past incarceration for possession of illegal drugs. Instead, she revived him with naloxone that she found in his bag.

Both the patient and his girlfriend were scared and surprised by his “terrible reaction,” as he had previously purchased heroin from the same dealer and used the same dose without similar effects. However, the patient did note that the drug he purchased this time had a bright white tinge, when normally the drug was light yellow.

On physical examination, the patient’s heart rate and blood pressure were normal. There were needle track marks on both forearms, elbows, and upper arms. A laboratory workup obtained during this visit revealed anemia and a normal basic metabolic panel. A hepatitis C virus antibody test was positive, and a hepatic function panel revealed elevated transaminase levels. Urine toxicology was positive for opioids and negative for other substances.

CASE 2

A 58-year-old man with a history of chronic hepatitis C, polysubstance abuse, and schizophrenia was transported to the emergency department by EMS after his family found him unresponsive in his bedroom. The patient had agonal breathing when EMS arrived, so they administered naloxone (4 mg intranasal and 4 mg intravenous). His breathing improved, but his mental status did not. He was still obtunded upon arrival in the emergency department and vomited 4 tan-colored patches. The patient was tachycardic (heart rate, 108 beats/min), hypertensive (blood pressure, 189/95 mm Hg), and had rapid shallow breathing (respiratory rate, 38 breaths/min). He was intubated for airway protection, at which time 2 more tan-colored patches were removed from his pharynx.

Laboratory evaluation revealed an acute kidney injury with a high anion metabolic acidosis. A hepatic function panel showed elevated transaminase levels. Plasma acetaminophen and salicylate levels were normal. A computed tomography head scan was normal. Urine toxicology was negative for opioids but was positive for cocaine and benzodiazepines.

THE DIAGNOSIS

Opioid overdose caused the acute respiratory depression in both cases. In Case 1, the patient unknowingly overdosed on heroin laced with fentanyl, known as China White, which likely caused the drug’s bright white tinge. In Case 2, the patient’s overdose was the result of oral ingestion of fentanyl patches. (Limited urine toxicology was negative for opiates because fentanyl is a fully synthetic opioid that shows up only with a specific or extended assay. More on this in a bit.)

DISCUSSION

The fatal drug overdose epidemic in the United States is growing. From 2000 to 2014, the mortality rate from drug overdose increased by 137%, including a 200% increase in the rate of overdose deaths related to opioids (ie, pain medications, heroin).¹ Between 2013 and 2014, the age-adjusted mortality rate related to methadone, a synthetic opioid, remained unchanged; however, age-adjusted mortality rates related to natural and semisynthetic opioid pain medications, heroin, and synthetic opioids other than methadone (eg, fentanyl) increased by 9%, 26%, and 80%, respectively. In 2014, a sharp increase in overdose deaths related to synthetic opioids other than methadone coincided with law enforcement reports of increased availability of illegal fentanyl; however, the toxicology panel used by coroners and medical examiners at that time could not distinguish between illegal and prescription fentanyl.¹

Continue to: Among 70,237 drug overdose deaths...

Among 70,237 drug overdose deaths in the United States in 2017, 47,600 (67.8%) involved an opioid. From 2013 to 2017, drug overdose death rates increased in 35 of 50 states and the District of Columbia, and significant increases in death rates involving synthetic opioids occurred in 15 out of 20 states, likely driven by illicitly manufactured fentanyl.²

Fentanyl-laced heroin: More common, but not new

In October 1991, 3-methylfentanyl was identified in 16 fatal drug overdoses in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, contributing to a 4-fold increase in overdose deaths compared to the previous year. Fentanyl mixed with heroin and other drugs is commonly found in the Midwest, Northeast, and Southern regions of the United States; in 2014, more than 80% of fentanyl confiscations occurred in 10 states within these regions, with the highest incidence occurring in Ohio.³

When combined with fentanyl, heroin becomes 50 to 100 times more potent, resulting in a subjective high with exaggerated central nervous system depression manifesting as lethargy, miosis, and respiratory depression.⁴ Most drug users are unaware and unable to identify when heroin is laced with fentanyl, which may contribute to the rise in deaths from unintentional drug overdose.^1,5,6

Oral abuse of fentanyl patches can be fatal

Heroin is 50 to 100 times more potent when combined with fentanyl.

Outcomes from oral abuse of fentanyl patches have ranged from transient overdose symptoms, such as lethargy and respiratory depression, to death.^7-9 When administered in a medical setting, transbuccal fentanyl has a bioavailability of 50% to 65% across the buccal membrane. Nearly 20% of the drug escapes hepatic first pass metabolism when fentanyl patches are ingested orally and enters the systemic circulation, resulting in severe overdose and potentially death. Prolonged chewing and sucking on fentanyl patches increases the contact time with the buccal membrane, resulting in increased systemic absorption compared to oral ingestion without chewing/sucking.^7-9

Urine toxicology screening detects compounds based on a chemical assay for drugs—generally codeine, morphine, and their metabolites. Because fentanyl is a fully synthetic opioid, its structure is not like morphine or codeine. Therefore, fentanyl could not be detected on traditional urine toxicology screens for opiates. To detect the fentanyl, a urine drug screen would need an assay exclusively for fentanyl or its metabolite, norfentanyl.¹⁰ The fentanyl specific assay is increasingly available as part of commercially available, extended-panel urine toxicology testing.¹¹

Continue to: Survival of fentanyl overdose depends on naloxone availability

 

 

Survival of fentanyl overdose depends on naloxone availability

Naloxone is a safe and effective antidote to an opioid overdose. It comes in 3 preparations, including intramuscular and subcutaneous injections and an intranasal spray.¹² Concerns that naloxone will harm patients with opioid dependence are unfounded. Naloxone can induce symptoms of opioid withdrawal, such as yawning, lacrimation, piloerection, diaphoresis, myalgia, vomiting, and diarrhea. While these withdrawal symptoms are unpleasant, they are not life threatening.¹² Due to its high potency, large doses of naloxone (ie, 4–16 mg) are required to reverse the effects of a fentanyl overdose.¹³ Intranasal naloxone hydrochloride 4 mg delivered in a single spray is preferred due to the ease of administration. Repeat doses may be necessary if respiratory depression continues or recurs prior to the arrival of emergency medical services. Increasing the availability of naloxone to first responders has the potential to save many lives.⁶

THE TAKEAWAY

Fentanyl is a major contributor to the growing drug overdose crisis in the United States. When laced with heroin or consumed orally in the form of transdermal patches, fentanyl becomes more potent and is increasingly fatal. It’s crucial that primary care physicians be able to identify and educate at-risk patients about the fatal consequences of fentanyl overdose and coordinate care to help get them into an appropriate rehabilitation program.

In order to quickly recognize the signs of fentanyl-related overdose, it’s important to be alert for this possibility. At the bedside, the most easily recognized abnormality associated with fentanyl or other opioid overdose is a decline in respiratory rate culminating in apnea.¹⁰ A respiratory rate of 12 breaths/min or less in a patient who is not in physiologic sleep strongly suggests acute opioid intoxication, particularly when accompanied by miosis or stupor. Other signs include bradycardia, hypotension, and seizures from anoxia.¹⁰

Naloxone is a safe and effective antidote that is critical to the prevention of fatal opioid overdoses.

Apart from the severity of symptoms, it is hard to clinically distinguish fentanyl overdose from other opiate overdose incidents. Given the degree to which illegal opiates are contaminated with fentanyl in the United States,³ it is appropriate to screen for fentanyl with extended panel urine toxicology testing in patients with suspected opioid overdose.

CORRESPONDENCE
Jaividhya Dasarathy, MD, 2500 MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44109; [email protected]

Case Reports

Patient 1
A 56-year-old white man with a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, sleep apnea, bilateral knee replacement, and cataract removal presented to the emergency department with a worsening rash on the left posterior medial leg of 6 months’ duration. He reported associated redness and tenderness with the plaques as well as increased swelling and firmness of the leg. He was admitted to the hospital where the infectious disease team treated him with cefazolin for presumed cellulitis. His condition did not improve, and another course of cefazolin was started in addition to oral fluconazole and clotrimazole–betamethasone dipropionate lotion for a possible fungal cause. Again, treatment provided no improvement.

He was then evaluated by dermatology. On physical examination, the patient had edema, warmth, and induration of the left lower leg. There also was an annular and serpiginous indurated plaque with minimal scale on the left lower leg (Figure 1). A firm, dark red to purple plaque on the left medial thigh with mild scale was present. There also was scaling of the right plantar foot.

On physical examination, the patient had a 1-cm violaceous nodule on the extensor surface of the left mid forearm. An arteriovenous fistula was present proximal to the lesion on the left arm (Figure 3).

Comment

Presentation of AAD
Acroangiodermatitis is a rare chronic inflammatory skin process involving a reactive proliferation of capillaries and fibrosis of the skin that resembles Kaposi sarcoma both clinically and histopathologically. The condition has been reported in patients with chronic venous insufficiency,¹ congenital arteriovenous malformation,² acquired iatrogenic arteriovenous fistula,³ paralyzed extremity,⁴ suction socket lower limb prosthesis (amputees),⁵ and minor trauma.^6-8 The lesions of AAD tend to be circumscribed, slowly evolving, red-violaceous (or brown or dusky) macules, papules, or plaques that may become verrucous or develop into painful ulcerations. They generally occur on the distal dorsal aspects of the lower legs and feet.¹¹⁰

Variants of AAD
Mali et al⁹ first reported cutaneous manifestations resembling Kaposi sarcoma in 18 patients with chronic venous insufficiency in 1965. Two years later, Bluefarb and Adams¹⁰ described kaposiform skin lesions in one patient with a congenital arteriovenous malformation without chronic venous insufficiency. It was not until 1974, however, that Earhart et al¹¹ proposed the term pseudo-Kaposi sarcoma.^10,11 Based on these findings, AAD is described as 2 variants: Mali type and SBS.

Mali-type AAD is more common and typically occurs in elderly men. It classically presents bilaterally on the lower extremities in association with severe chronic venous insufficiency.⁵ Skin lesions usually occur on the medial aspect of the lower legs (as in patient 1), dorsum of the heel, hallux, or second toe.¹²

The etiology of Mali-type AAD is poorly understood. The leading theory is that the condition involves reduced perfusion due to chronic edema, resulting in neovascularization, fibroblast proliferation, hypertrophy, and inflammatory skin changes. When AAD occurs in the setting of a suction socket prosthesis, the negative pressure of the stump-socket environment is thought to alter local circulation, leading to proliferation of small blood vessels.^5,13

Stewart-Bluefarb syndrome usually involves a single extremity in young adults with congenital arteriovenous malformations, amputees, and individuals with hemiplegia or iatrogenic arteriovenous fistulae (as in patient 2).¹ It was once thought to occur secondary to Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome; however, SBS rarely is accompanied by limb hypertrophy.⁹ Pathogenesis is thought to involve an angiogenic response to a high perfusion rate and high oxygen saturation, which leads to fibroblast proliferation and reactive endothelial hyperplasia.^1,14

Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis
Prompt identification of an underlying arteriovenous anomaly is critical, given the sequelae of high-flow shunts, which may result in skin ulceration, limb length discrepancy, cortical thinning of bone with regional osteoporosis, and congestive heart failure.^1,5 Duplex ultrasonography is the first-line diagnostic modality because it is noninvasive and widely available. The key doppler feature of an arteriovenous malformation is low resistance and high diastolic pulsatile flow,¹ which should be confirmed with magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomography angiography if present on ultrasonography.

The differential diagnosis of AAD includes Kaposi sarcoma, reactive angioendotheliomatosis, diffuse dermal angiomatosis, intravascular histiocytosis, glomeruloid angioendotheliomatosis, and angiopericytomatosis.^15,16 These entities present as multiple erythematous, violaceous, purpuric patches and plaques generally on the extremities but can have a widely varied distribution. Some lesions evolve to necrosis or ulceration. Histopathologic analysis is useful to differentiate these entities.

Histopathology
The histopathologic features of AAD can be nonspecific; clinicopathologic correlation often is necessary to establish the diagnosis. Features include a proliferation of small thick-walled vessels, often in a lobular arrangement, in an edematous papillary dermis. Small thrombi may be observed. There may be increased fibroblasts; plump endothelial cells; a superficial mixed infiltrate comprised of lymphocytes, histiocytes, and eosinophils; and deposition of hemosiderin.^2,5 These characteristics overlap with features of Kaposi sarcoma; AAD, however, lacks slitlike vascular spaces, perivascular CD34⁺ expression, and nuclear atypia. A negative HHV-8 stain will assist in ruling out Kaposi sarcoma.^1,17

Management
Treatment reports are anecdotal. The goal is to correct underlying venous hypertension. Conservative measures with compression garments, intermittent pneumatic compression, and limb elevation are first line.¹⁸ Oral antibiotics and local wound care with topical emollients and corticosteroids have been shown to be effective treatments.^19-21

Oral erythromycin 500 mg 4 times daily for 3 weeks and clobetasol propionate cream 0.05% healed a lower extremity ulcer in a patient with Mali-type AAD.²¹ In another patient, conservative treatment of Mali-type AAD failed, but rapid improvement of 2 lower extremity ulcers resulted after 3 weeks of oral dapsone 50 mg twice daily.²²

A tissue matrix–protective agent (a heparan sulfate mimetic) was reported to completely resolve a patient’s lower extremity ulcer secondary to SBS after other treatment modalities failed.¹⁹ In the SBS variant of AAD, treatment should be directed toward obliterating the underlying arteriovenous malformation, which can be achieved by selective embolization, endovenous ablation, sclerotherapy, or surgical intervention.^1,2

Conclusion

Acroangiodermatitis is a rare entity that is characterized by erythematous violaceous papules and plaques of the extremities, commonly in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency or an arteriovenous shunt. Histopathologic analysis shows proliferation of capillaries with fibrosis, extravasation of erythrocytes, and deposition of hemosiderin without the spindle cells and slitlike vascular spaces characteristic of Kaposi sarcoma. Detection of an underlying arteriovenous malformation is essential, as the disease can have local and systemic consequences, such as skin ulceration and congestive heart failure.¹ Treatment options are conservative, directed toward local wound care, compression, and management of complications, such as ulceration and infection, as well as obliterating any underlying arteriovenous malformation.

Case Reports

Patient 1
A 56-year-old white man with a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, sleep apnea, bilateral knee replacement, and cataract removal presented to the emergency department with a worsening rash on the left posterior medial leg of 6 months’ duration. He reported associated redness and tenderness with the plaques as well as increased swelling and firmness of the leg. He was admitted to the hospital where the infectious disease team treated him with cefazolin for presumed cellulitis. His condition did not improve, and another course of cefazolin was started in addition to oral fluconazole and clotrimazole–betamethasone dipropionate lotion for a possible fungal cause. Again, treatment provided no improvement.

He was then evaluated by dermatology. On physical examination, the patient had edema, warmth, and induration of the left lower leg. There also was an annular and serpiginous indurated plaque with minimal scale on the left lower leg (Figure 1). A firm, dark red to purple plaque on the left medial thigh with mild scale was present. There also was scaling of the right plantar foot.

On physical examination, the patient had a 1-cm violaceous nodule on the extensor surface of the left mid forearm. An arteriovenous fistula was present proximal to the lesion on the left arm (Figure 3).

Comment

Presentation of AAD
Acroangiodermatitis is a rare chronic inflammatory skin process involving a reactive proliferation of capillaries and fibrosis of the skin that resembles Kaposi sarcoma both clinically and histopathologically. The condition has been reported in patients with chronic venous insufficiency,¹ congenital arteriovenous malformation,² acquired iatrogenic arteriovenous fistula,³ paralyzed extremity,⁴ suction socket lower limb prosthesis (amputees),⁵ and minor trauma.^6-8 The lesions of AAD tend to be circumscribed, slowly evolving, red-violaceous (or brown or dusky) macules, papules, or plaques that may become verrucous or develop into painful ulcerations. They generally occur on the distal dorsal aspects of the lower legs and feet.¹¹⁰

Variants of AAD
Mali et al⁹ first reported cutaneous manifestations resembling Kaposi sarcoma in 18 patients with chronic venous insufficiency in 1965. Two years later, Bluefarb and Adams¹⁰ described kaposiform skin lesions in one patient with a congenital arteriovenous malformation without chronic venous insufficiency. It was not until 1974, however, that Earhart et al¹¹ proposed the term pseudo-Kaposi sarcoma.^10,11 Based on these findings, AAD is described as 2 variants: Mali type and SBS.

Mali-type AAD is more common and typically occurs in elderly men. It classically presents bilaterally on the lower extremities in association with severe chronic venous insufficiency.⁵ Skin lesions usually occur on the medial aspect of the lower legs (as in patient 1), dorsum of the heel, hallux, or second toe.¹²

The etiology of Mali-type AAD is poorly understood. The leading theory is that the condition involves reduced perfusion due to chronic edema, resulting in neovascularization, fibroblast proliferation, hypertrophy, and inflammatory skin changes. When AAD occurs in the setting of a suction socket prosthesis, the negative pressure of the stump-socket environment is thought to alter local circulation, leading to proliferation of small blood vessels.^5,13

Stewart-Bluefarb syndrome usually involves a single extremity in young adults with congenital arteriovenous malformations, amputees, and individuals with hemiplegia or iatrogenic arteriovenous fistulae (as in patient 2).¹ It was once thought to occur secondary to Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome; however, SBS rarely is accompanied by limb hypertrophy.⁹ Pathogenesis is thought to involve an angiogenic response to a high perfusion rate and high oxygen saturation, which leads to fibroblast proliferation and reactive endothelial hyperplasia.^1,14

Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis
Prompt identification of an underlying arteriovenous anomaly is critical, given the sequelae of high-flow shunts, which may result in skin ulceration, limb length discrepancy, cortical thinning of bone with regional osteoporosis, and congestive heart failure.^1,5 Duplex ultrasonography is the first-line diagnostic modality because it is noninvasive and widely available. The key doppler feature of an arteriovenous malformation is low resistance and high diastolic pulsatile flow,¹ which should be confirmed with magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomography angiography if present on ultrasonography.

The differential diagnosis of AAD includes Kaposi sarcoma, reactive angioendotheliomatosis, diffuse dermal angiomatosis, intravascular histiocytosis, glomeruloid angioendotheliomatosis, and angiopericytomatosis.^15,16 These entities present as multiple erythematous, violaceous, purpuric patches and plaques generally on the extremities but can have a widely varied distribution. Some lesions evolve to necrosis or ulceration. Histopathologic analysis is useful to differentiate these entities.

Histopathology
The histopathologic features of AAD can be nonspecific; clinicopathologic correlation often is necessary to establish the diagnosis. Features include a proliferation of small thick-walled vessels, often in a lobular arrangement, in an edematous papillary dermis. Small thrombi may be observed. There may be increased fibroblasts; plump endothelial cells; a superficial mixed infiltrate comprised of lymphocytes, histiocytes, and eosinophils; and deposition of hemosiderin.^2,5 These characteristics overlap with features of Kaposi sarcoma; AAD, however, lacks slitlike vascular spaces, perivascular CD34⁺ expression, and nuclear atypia. A negative HHV-8 stain will assist in ruling out Kaposi sarcoma.^1,17

Management
Treatment reports are anecdotal. The goal is to correct underlying venous hypertension. Conservative measures with compression garments, intermittent pneumatic compression, and limb elevation are first line.¹⁸ Oral antibiotics and local wound care with topical emollients and corticosteroids have been shown to be effective treatments.^19-21

Oral erythromycin 500 mg 4 times daily for 3 weeks and clobetasol propionate cream 0.05% healed a lower extremity ulcer in a patient with Mali-type AAD.²¹ In another patient, conservative treatment of Mali-type AAD failed, but rapid improvement of 2 lower extremity ulcers resulted after 3 weeks of oral dapsone 50 mg twice daily.²²

A tissue matrix–protective agent (a heparan sulfate mimetic) was reported to completely resolve a patient’s lower extremity ulcer secondary to SBS after other treatment modalities failed.¹⁹ In the SBS variant of AAD, treatment should be directed toward obliterating the underlying arteriovenous malformation, which can be achieved by selective embolization, endovenous ablation, sclerotherapy, or surgical intervention.^1,2

Conclusion

Acroangiodermatitis is a rare entity that is characterized by erythematous violaceous papules and plaques of the extremities, commonly in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency or an arteriovenous shunt. Histopathologic analysis shows proliferation of capillaries with fibrosis, extravasation of erythrocytes, and deposition of hemosiderin without the spindle cells and slitlike vascular spaces characteristic of Kaposi sarcoma. Detection of an underlying arteriovenous malformation is essential, as the disease can have local and systemic consequences, such as skin ulceration and congestive heart failure.¹ Treatment options are conservative, directed toward local wound care, compression, and management of complications, such as ulceration and infection, as well as obliterating any underlying arteriovenous malformation.

Case Reports

Patient 1
A 56-year-old white man with a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, sleep apnea, bilateral knee replacement, and cataract removal presented to the emergency department with a worsening rash on the left posterior medial leg of 6 months’ duration. He reported associated redness and tenderness with the plaques as well as increased swelling and firmness of the leg. He was admitted to the hospital where the infectious disease team treated him with cefazolin for presumed cellulitis. His condition did not improve, and another course of cefazolin was started in addition to oral fluconazole and clotrimazole–betamethasone dipropionate lotion for a possible fungal cause. Again, treatment provided no improvement.

He was then evaluated by dermatology. On physical examination, the patient had edema, warmth, and induration of the left lower leg. There also was an annular and serpiginous indurated plaque with minimal scale on the left lower leg (Figure 1). A firm, dark red to purple plaque on the left medial thigh with mild scale was present. There also was scaling of the right plantar foot.

On physical examination, the patient had a 1-cm violaceous nodule on the extensor surface of the left mid forearm. An arteriovenous fistula was present proximal to the lesion on the left arm (Figure 3).

Comment

Presentation of AAD
Acroangiodermatitis is a rare chronic inflammatory skin process involving a reactive proliferation of capillaries and fibrosis of the skin that resembles Kaposi sarcoma both clinically and histopathologically. The condition has been reported in patients with chronic venous insufficiency,¹ congenital arteriovenous malformation,² acquired iatrogenic arteriovenous fistula,³ paralyzed extremity,⁴ suction socket lower limb prosthesis (amputees),⁵ and minor trauma.^6-8 The lesions of AAD tend to be circumscribed, slowly evolving, red-violaceous (or brown or dusky) macules, papules, or plaques that may become verrucous or develop into painful ulcerations. They generally occur on the distal dorsal aspects of the lower legs and feet.¹¹⁰

Variants of AAD
Mali et al⁹ first reported cutaneous manifestations resembling Kaposi sarcoma in 18 patients with chronic venous insufficiency in 1965. Two years later, Bluefarb and Adams¹⁰ described kaposiform skin lesions in one patient with a congenital arteriovenous malformation without chronic venous insufficiency. It was not until 1974, however, that Earhart et al¹¹ proposed the term pseudo-Kaposi sarcoma.^10,11 Based on these findings, AAD is described as 2 variants: Mali type and SBS.

Mali-type AAD is more common and typically occurs in elderly men. It classically presents bilaterally on the lower extremities in association with severe chronic venous insufficiency.⁵ Skin lesions usually occur on the medial aspect of the lower legs (as in patient 1), dorsum of the heel, hallux, or second toe.¹²

The etiology of Mali-type AAD is poorly understood. The leading theory is that the condition involves reduced perfusion due to chronic edema, resulting in neovascularization, fibroblast proliferation, hypertrophy, and inflammatory skin changes. When AAD occurs in the setting of a suction socket prosthesis, the negative pressure of the stump-socket environment is thought to alter local circulation, leading to proliferation of small blood vessels.^5,13

Stewart-Bluefarb syndrome usually involves a single extremity in young adults with congenital arteriovenous malformations, amputees, and individuals with hemiplegia or iatrogenic arteriovenous fistulae (as in patient 2).¹ It was once thought to occur secondary to Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome; however, SBS rarely is accompanied by limb hypertrophy.⁹ Pathogenesis is thought to involve an angiogenic response to a high perfusion rate and high oxygen saturation, which leads to fibroblast proliferation and reactive endothelial hyperplasia.^1,14

Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis
Prompt identification of an underlying arteriovenous anomaly is critical, given the sequelae of high-flow shunts, which may result in skin ulceration, limb length discrepancy, cortical thinning of bone with regional osteoporosis, and congestive heart failure.^1,5 Duplex ultrasonography is the first-line diagnostic modality because it is noninvasive and widely available. The key doppler feature of an arteriovenous malformation is low resistance and high diastolic pulsatile flow,¹ which should be confirmed with magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomography angiography if present on ultrasonography.

The differential diagnosis of AAD includes Kaposi sarcoma, reactive angioendotheliomatosis, diffuse dermal angiomatosis, intravascular histiocytosis, glomeruloid angioendotheliomatosis, and angiopericytomatosis.^15,16 These entities present as multiple erythematous, violaceous, purpuric patches and plaques generally on the extremities but can have a widely varied distribution. Some lesions evolve to necrosis or ulceration. Histopathologic analysis is useful to differentiate these entities.

Histopathology
The histopathologic features of AAD can be nonspecific; clinicopathologic correlation often is necessary to establish the diagnosis. Features include a proliferation of small thick-walled vessels, often in a lobular arrangement, in an edematous papillary dermis. Small thrombi may be observed. There may be increased fibroblasts; plump endothelial cells; a superficial mixed infiltrate comprised of lymphocytes, histiocytes, and eosinophils; and deposition of hemosiderin.^2,5 These characteristics overlap with features of Kaposi sarcoma; AAD, however, lacks slitlike vascular spaces, perivascular CD34⁺ expression, and nuclear atypia. A negative HHV-8 stain will assist in ruling out Kaposi sarcoma.^1,17

Management
Treatment reports are anecdotal. The goal is to correct underlying venous hypertension. Conservative measures with compression garments, intermittent pneumatic compression, and limb elevation are first line.¹⁸ Oral antibiotics and local wound care with topical emollients and corticosteroids have been shown to be effective treatments.^19-21

Oral erythromycin 500 mg 4 times daily for 3 weeks and clobetasol propionate cream 0.05% healed a lower extremity ulcer in a patient with Mali-type AAD.²¹ In another patient, conservative treatment of Mali-type AAD failed, but rapid improvement of 2 lower extremity ulcers resulted after 3 weeks of oral dapsone 50 mg twice daily.²²

A tissue matrix–protective agent (a heparan sulfate mimetic) was reported to completely resolve a patient’s lower extremity ulcer secondary to SBS after other treatment modalities failed.¹⁹ In the SBS variant of AAD, treatment should be directed toward obliterating the underlying arteriovenous malformation, which can be achieved by selective embolization, endovenous ablation, sclerotherapy, or surgical intervention.^1,2

Conclusion

Acroangiodermatitis is a rare entity that is characterized by erythematous violaceous papules and plaques of the extremities, commonly in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency or an arteriovenous shunt. Histopathologic analysis shows proliferation of capillaries with fibrosis, extravasation of erythrocytes, and deposition of hemosiderin without the spindle cells and slitlike vascular spaces characteristic of Kaposi sarcoma. Detection of an underlying arteriovenous malformation is essential, as the disease can have local and systemic consequences, such as skin ulceration and congestive heart failure.¹ Treatment options are conservative, directed toward local wound care, compression, and management of complications, such as ulceration and infection, as well as obliterating any underlying arteriovenous malformation.

Heparin is a naturally occurring anticoagulant and is commonly used to treat or prevent venous thrombosis or the extension of thrombosis.¹ Heparin is composed of 15-kDa chains of complex polysaccharides with repeating pentasaccharide sequences. These high-affinity pentasaccharide subunits bind and activate antithrombin III, which exerts its dominant anticoagulant effects through the inhibition of factor Xa.²

Adverse effects of heparin administration include bleeding, injection-site pain, and thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious side effect wherein antibodies are formed against platelet antigens and predispose the patient to venous and arterial thrombosis.³ Dermatologic adverse effects of heparin range from commonly reported injection-site eruptions to the more rarely described distant or generalized cutaneous reactions.⁴

Bullous hemorrhagic dermatosis is a poorly understood idiosyncratic drug reaction characterized by tense, blood-filled blisters that arise following the administration of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin or intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH). First reported in 2006 by Perrinaud et al,⁵ only a few case reports describing this phenomenon exist in the literature.^6-8 We report a unique case of hemorrhagic bullae limited to the oral mucosa.

Case Report

An 84-year-old man was admitted to the cardiology service with severe substernal chest pain. An electrocardiogram did not show any ST-segment elevations; however, he had elevated troponin T levels. He had a medical history of coronary artery disease complicated by myocardial infarction (MI), as well as ischemic cardiomyopathy, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, ischemic stroke, and pulmonary embolism for which he was on long-term anticoagulation for years with warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel. The patient was diagnosed with a non–ST-segment elevation MI. Accordingly, the patient’s warfarin was discontinued, and he was administered a bolus and continuous infusion of UFH. He also was continued on aspirin and clopidogrel. Within 6 hours of initiation of UFH, the patient noted multiple discrete swollen lesions in the mouth. Dermatology consultation and biopsy of the lesions were deferred due to acute management of the patient’s MI.

Physical examination revealed a moist oral mucosa with 7 slightly raised, hemorrhagic bullae ranging from 2 to 7 mm in diameter (Figure, A and B). One oral lesion was tense and had become denuded prior to evaluation. Laboratory testing included a normal platelet count (160,000/µL), a nearly therapeutic international normalized ratio (1.9), and a partial thromboplastin time that was initially normal (27 seconds) prior to admission and development of the oral lesions but found to be elevated (176 seconds) after admission and initial UFH bolus.

Comment

Heparin-Induced Skin Lesions
The 2 most common types of heparin-induced skin lesions are delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions and immune-mediated HIT. A 2009 Canadian study found that the overwhelming majority of heparin-induced skin lesions are due to delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions.⁴ The majority of these reactions occurred at or near the injection site on the abdomen and presented as eczematous plaques. Distant cutaneous involvement and lesions of the buccal mucosa were not as commonly reported. Female sex, obesity, and heparin treatment exceeding 9 days were identified as risk factors in the development of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions, but our patient did not have any of these risk factors.⁴

Types of HIT
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is one of the most serious adverse reactions to heparin administration. There are 2 subtypes of HIT, which differ in their clinical significance and pathophysiology.⁹ Type I HIT is a non–immune-mediated reaction that results from the direct effect of heparin on platelets, which causes platelet aggregation and thrombocytopenia. It presents within the first 2 days after heparin exposure.

Type II HIT is an immune-mediated response caused by the formation of IgG autoantibodies against the heparin–platelet factor 4 complex. Antibody formation and thrombocytopenia typically occur after 4 to 10 days of heparin exposure, and there can be devastating arterial and venous thrombotic complications.

Diagnosis of HIT
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia should be suspected in patients with a lowered platelet count, particularly if the decrease is more than 50% from baseline, and in patients who develop stroke, MI, pulmonary embolism, or deep vein thrombosis while on heparin. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was not observed in our patient, as his platelet count remained stable between 160,000 and 164,000/µL throughout his hospital stay and he did not develop any evidence of thrombosis.

Differential Diagnosis
Our patient’s lesions appeared morphologically similar to angina bullosa haemorrhagica, but this condition was less likely based on other clinical features. Typically, angina bullosa haemorrhagica appears as a solitary, blood-filled blister due to oral mucosal trauma from the ingestion of hard or abrasive food.¹⁰ Angina bullosa haemorrhagica most often is located on the soft palate because of its susceptibility to injury during mastication, and this lesion tends to be painful.¹¹ In contrast, our patient developed 7 painless lesions on the buccal mucosa, sparing the soft palate, and without any history of preceding trauma.

Bullous pemphigoid also was considered given the presence of tense bullae in an elderly patient. However, the rapid and spontaneous resolution of these lesions with complete lack of skin involvement made this diagnosis less likely.¹²

Heparin-Induced Bullous Hemorrhagic Dermatosis
Because our patient described a similar reaction while taking enoxaparin in the past, this case represents an idiosyncratic drug reaction, possibly from antibodies to a heparin-antigen complex. Heparin-induced bullous hemorrhagic dermatosis is a rarely reported condition with the majority of lesions presenting on the extremities.

Conclusion

We describe a rare side effect of heparin therapy characterized by discrete blisters on the oral mucosa. However, familiarity with the spectrum of reactions to heparin allowed the patient to continue heparin therapy despite this side effect, as the eruption was not life-threatening and the benefit of continuing heparin outweighed this adverse effect.

Heparin is a naturally occurring anticoagulant and is commonly used to treat or prevent venous thrombosis or the extension of thrombosis.¹ Heparin is composed of 15-kDa chains of complex polysaccharides with repeating pentasaccharide sequences. These high-affinity pentasaccharide subunits bind and activate antithrombin III, which exerts its dominant anticoagulant effects through the inhibition of factor Xa.²

Adverse effects of heparin administration include bleeding, injection-site pain, and thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious side effect wherein antibodies are formed against platelet antigens and predispose the patient to venous and arterial thrombosis.³ Dermatologic adverse effects of heparin range from commonly reported injection-site eruptions to the more rarely described distant or generalized cutaneous reactions.⁴

Bullous hemorrhagic dermatosis is a poorly understood idiosyncratic drug reaction characterized by tense, blood-filled blisters that arise following the administration of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin or intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH). First reported in 2006 by Perrinaud et al,⁵ only a few case reports describing this phenomenon exist in the literature.^6-8 We report a unique case of hemorrhagic bullae limited to the oral mucosa.

Case Report

An 84-year-old man was admitted to the cardiology service with severe substernal chest pain. An electrocardiogram did not show any ST-segment elevations; however, he had elevated troponin T levels. He had a medical history of coronary artery disease complicated by myocardial infarction (MI), as well as ischemic cardiomyopathy, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, ischemic stroke, and pulmonary embolism for which he was on long-term anticoagulation for years with warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel. The patient was diagnosed with a non–ST-segment elevation MI. Accordingly, the patient’s warfarin was discontinued, and he was administered a bolus and continuous infusion of UFH. He also was continued on aspirin and clopidogrel. Within 6 hours of initiation of UFH, the patient noted multiple discrete swollen lesions in the mouth. Dermatology consultation and biopsy of the lesions were deferred due to acute management of the patient’s MI.

Physical examination revealed a moist oral mucosa with 7 slightly raised, hemorrhagic bullae ranging from 2 to 7 mm in diameter (Figure, A and B). One oral lesion was tense and had become denuded prior to evaluation. Laboratory testing included a normal platelet count (160,000/µL), a nearly therapeutic international normalized ratio (1.9), and a partial thromboplastin time that was initially normal (27 seconds) prior to admission and development of the oral lesions but found to be elevated (176 seconds) after admission and initial UFH bolus.

Comment

Heparin-Induced Skin Lesions
The 2 most common types of heparin-induced skin lesions are delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions and immune-mediated HIT. A 2009 Canadian study found that the overwhelming majority of heparin-induced skin lesions are due to delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions.⁴ The majority of these reactions occurred at or near the injection site on the abdomen and presented as eczematous plaques. Distant cutaneous involvement and lesions of the buccal mucosa were not as commonly reported. Female sex, obesity, and heparin treatment exceeding 9 days were identified as risk factors in the development of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions, but our patient did not have any of these risk factors.⁴

Types of HIT
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is one of the most serious adverse reactions to heparin administration. There are 2 subtypes of HIT, which differ in their clinical significance and pathophysiology.⁹ Type I HIT is a non–immune-mediated reaction that results from the direct effect of heparin on platelets, which causes platelet aggregation and thrombocytopenia. It presents within the first 2 days after heparin exposure.

Type II HIT is an immune-mediated response caused by the formation of IgG autoantibodies against the heparin–platelet factor 4 complex. Antibody formation and thrombocytopenia typically occur after 4 to 10 days of heparin exposure, and there can be devastating arterial and venous thrombotic complications.

Diagnosis of HIT
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia should be suspected in patients with a lowered platelet count, particularly if the decrease is more than 50% from baseline, and in patients who develop stroke, MI, pulmonary embolism, or deep vein thrombosis while on heparin. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was not observed in our patient, as his platelet count remained stable between 160,000 and 164,000/µL throughout his hospital stay and he did not develop any evidence of thrombosis.

Differential Diagnosis
Our patient’s lesions appeared morphologically similar to angina bullosa haemorrhagica, but this condition was less likely based on other clinical features. Typically, angina bullosa haemorrhagica appears as a solitary, blood-filled blister due to oral mucosal trauma from the ingestion of hard or abrasive food.¹⁰ Angina bullosa haemorrhagica most often is located on the soft palate because of its susceptibility to injury during mastication, and this lesion tends to be painful.¹¹ In contrast, our patient developed 7 painless lesions on the buccal mucosa, sparing the soft palate, and without any history of preceding trauma.

Bullous pemphigoid also was considered given the presence of tense bullae in an elderly patient. However, the rapid and spontaneous resolution of these lesions with complete lack of skin involvement made this diagnosis less likely.¹²

Heparin-Induced Bullous Hemorrhagic Dermatosis
Because our patient described a similar reaction while taking enoxaparin in the past, this case represents an idiosyncratic drug reaction, possibly from antibodies to a heparin-antigen complex. Heparin-induced bullous hemorrhagic dermatosis is a rarely reported condition with the majority of lesions presenting on the extremities.

Conclusion

We describe a rare side effect of heparin therapy characterized by discrete blisters on the oral mucosa. However, familiarity with the spectrum of reactions to heparin allowed the patient to continue heparin therapy despite this side effect, as the eruption was not life-threatening and the benefit of continuing heparin outweighed this adverse effect.

Heparin is a naturally occurring anticoagulant and is commonly used to treat or prevent venous thrombosis or the extension of thrombosis.¹ Heparin is composed of 15-kDa chains of complex polysaccharides with repeating pentasaccharide sequences. These high-affinity pentasaccharide subunits bind and activate antithrombin III, which exerts its dominant anticoagulant effects through the inhibition of factor Xa.²

Adverse effects of heparin administration include bleeding, injection-site pain, and thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious side effect wherein antibodies are formed against platelet antigens and predispose the patient to venous and arterial thrombosis.³ Dermatologic adverse effects of heparin range from commonly reported injection-site eruptions to the more rarely described distant or generalized cutaneous reactions.⁴

Bullous hemorrhagic dermatosis is a poorly understood idiosyncratic drug reaction characterized by tense, blood-filled blisters that arise following the administration of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin or intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH). First reported in 2006 by Perrinaud et al,⁵ only a few case reports describing this phenomenon exist in the literature.^6-8 We report a unique case of hemorrhagic bullae limited to the oral mucosa.

Case Report

An 84-year-old man was admitted to the cardiology service with severe substernal chest pain. An electrocardiogram did not show any ST-segment elevations; however, he had elevated troponin T levels. He had a medical history of coronary artery disease complicated by myocardial infarction (MI), as well as ischemic cardiomyopathy, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, ischemic stroke, and pulmonary embolism for which he was on long-term anticoagulation for years with warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel. The patient was diagnosed with a non–ST-segment elevation MI. Accordingly, the patient’s warfarin was discontinued, and he was administered a bolus and continuous infusion of UFH. He also was continued on aspirin and clopidogrel. Within 6 hours of initiation of UFH, the patient noted multiple discrete swollen lesions in the mouth. Dermatology consultation and biopsy of the lesions were deferred due to acute management of the patient’s MI.

Physical examination revealed a moist oral mucosa with 7 slightly raised, hemorrhagic bullae ranging from 2 to 7 mm in diameter (Figure, A and B). One oral lesion was tense and had become denuded prior to evaluation. Laboratory testing included a normal platelet count (160,000/µL), a nearly therapeutic international normalized ratio (1.9), and a partial thromboplastin time that was initially normal (27 seconds) prior to admission and development of the oral lesions but found to be elevated (176 seconds) after admission and initial UFH bolus.

Comment

Heparin-Induced Skin Lesions
The 2 most common types of heparin-induced skin lesions are delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions and immune-mediated HIT. A 2009 Canadian study found that the overwhelming majority of heparin-induced skin lesions are due to delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions.⁴ The majority of these reactions occurred at or near the injection site on the abdomen and presented as eczematous plaques. Distant cutaneous involvement and lesions of the buccal mucosa were not as commonly reported. Female sex, obesity, and heparin treatment exceeding 9 days were identified as risk factors in the development of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions, but our patient did not have any of these risk factors.⁴

Types of HIT
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is one of the most serious adverse reactions to heparin administration. There are 2 subtypes of HIT, which differ in their clinical significance and pathophysiology.⁹ Type I HIT is a non–immune-mediated reaction that results from the direct effect of heparin on platelets, which causes platelet aggregation and thrombocytopenia. It presents within the first 2 days after heparin exposure.

Type II HIT is an immune-mediated response caused by the formation of IgG autoantibodies against the heparin–platelet factor 4 complex. Antibody formation and thrombocytopenia typically occur after 4 to 10 days of heparin exposure, and there can be devastating arterial and venous thrombotic complications.

Diagnosis of HIT
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia should be suspected in patients with a lowered platelet count, particularly if the decrease is more than 50% from baseline, and in patients who develop stroke, MI, pulmonary embolism, or deep vein thrombosis while on heparin. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was not observed in our patient, as his platelet count remained stable between 160,000 and 164,000/µL throughout his hospital stay and he did not develop any evidence of thrombosis.

Differential Diagnosis
Our patient’s lesions appeared morphologically similar to angina bullosa haemorrhagica, but this condition was less likely based on other clinical features. Typically, angina bullosa haemorrhagica appears as a solitary, blood-filled blister due to oral mucosal trauma from the ingestion of hard or abrasive food.¹⁰ Angina bullosa haemorrhagica most often is located on the soft palate because of its susceptibility to injury during mastication, and this lesion tends to be painful.¹¹ In contrast, our patient developed 7 painless lesions on the buccal mucosa, sparing the soft palate, and without any history of preceding trauma.

Bullous pemphigoid also was considered given the presence of tense bullae in an elderly patient. However, the rapid and spontaneous resolution of these lesions with complete lack of skin involvement made this diagnosis less likely.¹²

Heparin-Induced Bullous Hemorrhagic Dermatosis
Because our patient described a similar reaction while taking enoxaparin in the past, this case represents an idiosyncratic drug reaction, possibly from antibodies to a heparin-antigen complex. Heparin-induced bullous hemorrhagic dermatosis is a rarely reported condition with the majority of lesions presenting on the extremities.

Conclusion

We describe a rare side effect of heparin therapy characterized by discrete blisters on the oral mucosa. However, familiarity with the spectrum of reactions to heparin allowed the patient to continue heparin therapy despite this side effect, as the eruption was not life-threatening and the benefit of continuing heparin outweighed this adverse effect.

Case Report

A 65-year-old woman presented with stage IVA2 mycosis fungoides (MF)(T4N3M0B2)/Sézary syndrome (SS). A peripheral blood count contained 6000 Sézary cells with cerebriform nuclei, a CD2^+/−CD3⁺CD4⁺CD5^+/−CD7⁺CD8⁻CD26⁻immunophenotype, and a highly abnormal CD4 to CD8 ratio (70:1). Positron emission tomography and computed tomography demonstrated hypermetabolic subcutaneous nodules in the base of the neck and generalized lymphadenopathy. Lymph node biopsy showed involvement by T-cell lymphoma and dominant T-cell receptor γ clonality by polymerase chain reaction.

On initial presentation to the Cutaneous Lymphoma Clinic at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the patient was erythrodermic. She also was noted to have undulating wavy bands and concentric annular, ringlike, thin, erythematous plaques with trailing scale, giving a wood grain, zebra hide–like appearance involving the buttocks, abdomen, and lower extremities (Figure 1). Lesions were markedly pruritic and were advancing rapidly. A diagnosis of erythema gyratum repens (EGR)–like eruption was made.

Interferon alfa-2b and methotrexate therapy was initiated. Additionally, oral terbinafine (250 mg/d) was initiated for 14 days, resulting in complete resolution of the EGR-like eruption; nevertheless, diffuse erythema remained. Subsequently, within 3 months of treatment, the cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) improved with continued interferon alfa-2b and methotrexate. Erythroderma became minimal; the circulating Sézary cell count decreased by 50%. The patient ultimately had multiple relapses in erythroderma and progression of SS. Erythema gyratum repens–like lesions recurred on multiple occasions, with a temporary response to repeat courses of oral terbinafine.

Comment

Defining True EGR vs EGR-like Eruption
Sézary syndrome represents the leukemic stage of CTCL, which is defined by the triad of erythroderma; generalized lymphadenopathy; and neoplastic T cells in the skin, lymph nodes, and peripheral blood. It is well known that CTCL can mimic multiple benign and malignant dermatoses. One rare presentation of CTCL is an EGR-like eruption.

Erythema gyratum repens presents as rapidly advancing, erythematous, concentric bands that can be figurate, gyrate, or annular, with a fine trailing edge of scale (wood grain pattern). The diagnosis is based on the characteristic clinical pattern of EGR and by ruling out other mimicking conditions with biopsy.¹ Patients with the characteristic clinical pattern but with an alternate underlying dermatosis are described as having an EGR-like eruption rather than true EGR.

True EGR is most often but not always associated with underlying malignancy. Biopsy of true EGR eruptions show nonspecific histopathologic features, with perivascular superficial mononuclear dermatitis, occasional mild spongiosis, and focal parakeratosis; specific features of an alternate dermatosis are lacking.² In addition to CTCL, EGR-like eruptions have been described in a number of diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, erythema annulare centrifugum, bullous dermatosis, erythrokeratodermia variabilis, urticarial vasculitis, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, and neutrophilic dermatoses.

Prior Reports of EGR-like Eruption in Association With MF
According to a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms erythema gyratum repens in mycosis fungoides, mycosis fungoides with tinea, and concentric wood grain erythema, there have been 6 other cases of an EGR-like eruption in association with MF (Table). Poonawalla et al³ first described an EGR-like eruption (utilizing the term tinea pseudoimbricata) in a 55-year-old man with stage IB MF (T2N0M0B0). The patient had a preceding history of tinea pedis and tinea corporis that preceded the diagnosis of MF. At the time of MF diagnosis, the patient presented with extensive concentric, gyrate, wood grain, annular lesions. His MF was resistant to topical mechlorethamine, psoralen plus UVA, and oral bexarotene. The body surface area involvement decreased from 60% to less than 1% after institution of oral and topical antifungal therapy. It was postulated that the widespread dermatophytosis that preceded the development of MF may have been the persistent antigen leading to his disease. Preceding the diagnosis of MF, skin scrapings were floridly positive for dermatophyte hyphae. Fungal cultures from the affected areas of skin grew T rubrum.³

Moore et al⁴ described an EGR-like eruption on the trunk of a 73-year-old man with stage IA MF (T1N0M0B0). Biopsy was consistent with MF, but no fungal organisms were seen. Potassium hydroxide preparation and fungal cultures of the lesions also were negative for organisms. The patient was successfully treated with topical betamethasone.⁴Jouary et al⁵ described an EGR-like eruption in a 77-year-old man with stage III erythrodermic MF (T4N1M0B0). Biopsy showed mycelia on PAS stain. Subsequent culture isolated T rubrum. Terbinafine (250 mg/d) and ketoconazole cream 2% daily were initiated and the patient’s EGR-like rash quickly cleared, while MF progressed to SS.⁵

Cerri et al⁶ later described a case of EGR-like eruption in a 61-year-old man with stage I MF and an EGR-like eruption. Microscopic examination of potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparations and fungal culture of the lesions failed to demonstrate mycotic infection. There was no mention of PAS stain of skin biopsy specimens. In this case, the authors mentioned that EGR-like lesions preceded exacerbation of MF and questioned the prognostic significance of the EGR-like eruption in relation to MF.⁶

Holcomb et al⁷ reported the next case of a 75-year-old man with stage IIB MF (T3N0M0B0) with CD25⁺ and CD30⁺ large cell transformation who presented with an EGR-like eruption. In this case, PAS stain and KOH preparations were repeatedly negative for mycotic infection. Disease progression was not mentioned following the appearance of the EGR-like eruption.⁷

Nagase et al⁸ most recently described a case of a 73-year-old Japanese man with stage IB (T2N0M0B0) CD4⁻CD8⁻ MF and lung cancer who developed a cutaneous eruption mimicking EGR. Microscopy and culture excluded the presence of a mycotic infection. The patient achieved partial remission with photochemotherapy (psoralen plus UVA) combined with topical corticosteroids. No major changes in the patient’s skin lesions were noted following surgical resection of the lung cancer.⁸

Dermatophyte Infection
It is known that conventional tinea corporis can occur in the setting of CTCL. However, EGR-like eruptions in CTCL can be distinguished from standard tinea corporis by the classic morphology of EGR and clinical history of rapid migration of these characteristic lesions.

Tinea imbricata is known to have a clinical appearance that is similar to EGR, but the infection is caused by Tinea concentricum, which is limited to southwest Polynesia, Melanesia, Southeast Asia, India, and Central America. Although T rubrum was the dermatophyte isolated by Poonawalla et al,³ Jouary et al,⁵ and in our case, whether T rubrum infection in the setting of CTCL has any impact on prognosis needs further study.

Our case of an EGR-like eruption presented in a patient with SS and tinea corporis. Biopsy specimens showed CTCL and concomitant dermatophytic infection that was confirmed with PAS stain and identified as T rubrum. Interestingly, our patient’s EGR-like eruption cleared with oral terbinafine therapy, consistent with findings described by Poonawalla et al³ and Jouary et al⁵ in which treatment of the dermatophytic infection led to resolution of the EGR-like eruption, suggesting a causative role.

However, testing for dermatophytes was negative in the other reported cases of EGR-like eruptions in patients with MF, despite screening for the presence of fungal microorganisms using KOH preparation, PAS staining, or fungal culture, or a combination of these methods,^3-8 which raises the question: Do the cases reported without dermatophytic infection represent false-negative test results, or can the distinct clinical appearance of EGR indeed be seen in patients with CTCL who lack superimposed dermatophytosis? In 3 prior reported cases of EGR-like eruptions in MF, the eruption was preceded by immunosuppressive therapy.^5-7

Further investigation is needed to correlate the role of dermatophytic infection in EGR-like eruptions. Our case and the Jouary et al⁵ case reported dermatophyte-positive EGR-like eruptions in MF and SS detected with histopathologic analysis and PAS stain. This low-cost screening method should be considered in future cases. If the test result is dermatophyte positive, a 14-day course of oral terbinafine (250 mg/d) might induce resolution of the EGR-like eruption.

Conclusion

The role of dermatophyte-induced EGR or EGR-like eruptions in other settings also warrants further investigation to shed light on this poorly understood yet striking dermatologic condition. Our patient showed both MF and dermatophytes in skin biopsy results, regardless of whether those sites showed erythroderma or EGR-like features clinically. On 3 occasions, antifungal treatment cleared the EGR-like lesions and associated pruritus but not erythroderma. Therefore, it appears that the mere presence of dermatophytes was necessary but not sufficient to produce the EGR-like lesions observed in our case.

Case Report

A 65-year-old woman presented with stage IVA2 mycosis fungoides (MF)(T4N3M0B2)/Sézary syndrome (SS). A peripheral blood count contained 6000 Sézary cells with cerebriform nuclei, a CD2^+/−CD3⁺CD4⁺CD5^+/−CD7⁺CD8⁻CD26⁻immunophenotype, and a highly abnormal CD4 to CD8 ratio (70:1). Positron emission tomography and computed tomography demonstrated hypermetabolic subcutaneous nodules in the base of the neck and generalized lymphadenopathy. Lymph node biopsy showed involvement by T-cell lymphoma and dominant T-cell receptor γ clonality by polymerase chain reaction.

On initial presentation to the Cutaneous Lymphoma Clinic at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the patient was erythrodermic. She also was noted to have undulating wavy bands and concentric annular, ringlike, thin, erythematous plaques with trailing scale, giving a wood grain, zebra hide–like appearance involving the buttocks, abdomen, and lower extremities (Figure 1). Lesions were markedly pruritic and were advancing rapidly. A diagnosis of erythema gyratum repens (EGR)–like eruption was made.

Interferon alfa-2b and methotrexate therapy was initiated. Additionally, oral terbinafine (250 mg/d) was initiated for 14 days, resulting in complete resolution of the EGR-like eruption; nevertheless, diffuse erythema remained. Subsequently, within 3 months of treatment, the cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) improved with continued interferon alfa-2b and methotrexate. Erythroderma became minimal; the circulating Sézary cell count decreased by 50%. The patient ultimately had multiple relapses in erythroderma and progression of SS. Erythema gyratum repens–like lesions recurred on multiple occasions, with a temporary response to repeat courses of oral terbinafine.

Comment

Defining True EGR vs EGR-like Eruption
Sézary syndrome represents the leukemic stage of CTCL, which is defined by the triad of erythroderma; generalized lymphadenopathy; and neoplastic T cells in the skin, lymph nodes, and peripheral blood. It is well known that CTCL can mimic multiple benign and malignant dermatoses. One rare presentation of CTCL is an EGR-like eruption.

Erythema gyratum repens presents as rapidly advancing, erythematous, concentric bands that can be figurate, gyrate, or annular, with a fine trailing edge of scale (wood grain pattern). The diagnosis is based on the characteristic clinical pattern of EGR and by ruling out other mimicking conditions with biopsy.¹ Patients with the characteristic clinical pattern but with an alternate underlying dermatosis are described as having an EGR-like eruption rather than true EGR.

True EGR is most often but not always associated with underlying malignancy. Biopsy of true EGR eruptions show nonspecific histopathologic features, with perivascular superficial mononuclear dermatitis, occasional mild spongiosis, and focal parakeratosis; specific features of an alternate dermatosis are lacking.² In addition to CTCL, EGR-like eruptions have been described in a number of diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, erythema annulare centrifugum, bullous dermatosis, erythrokeratodermia variabilis, urticarial vasculitis, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, and neutrophilic dermatoses.

Prior Reports of EGR-like Eruption in Association With MF
According to a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms erythema gyratum repens in mycosis fungoides, mycosis fungoides with tinea, and concentric wood grain erythema, there have been 6 other cases of an EGR-like eruption in association with MF (Table). Poonawalla et al³ first described an EGR-like eruption (utilizing the term tinea pseudoimbricata) in a 55-year-old man with stage IB MF (T2N0M0B0). The patient had a preceding history of tinea pedis and tinea corporis that preceded the diagnosis of MF. At the time of MF diagnosis, the patient presented with extensive concentric, gyrate, wood grain, annular lesions. His MF was resistant to topical mechlorethamine, psoralen plus UVA, and oral bexarotene. The body surface area involvement decreased from 60% to less than 1% after institution of oral and topical antifungal therapy. It was postulated that the widespread dermatophytosis that preceded the development of MF may have been the persistent antigen leading to his disease. Preceding the diagnosis of MF, skin scrapings were floridly positive for dermatophyte hyphae. Fungal cultures from the affected areas of skin grew T rubrum.³

Moore et al⁴ described an EGR-like eruption on the trunk of a 73-year-old man with stage IA MF (T1N0M0B0). Biopsy was consistent with MF, but no fungal organisms were seen. Potassium hydroxide preparation and fungal cultures of the lesions also were negative for organisms. The patient was successfully treated with topical betamethasone.⁴Jouary et al⁵ described an EGR-like eruption in a 77-year-old man with stage III erythrodermic MF (T4N1M0B0). Biopsy showed mycelia on PAS stain. Subsequent culture isolated T rubrum. Terbinafine (250 mg/d) and ketoconazole cream 2% daily were initiated and the patient’s EGR-like rash quickly cleared, while MF progressed to SS.⁵

Cerri et al⁶ later described a case of EGR-like eruption in a 61-year-old man with stage I MF and an EGR-like eruption. Microscopic examination of potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparations and fungal culture of the lesions failed to demonstrate mycotic infection. There was no mention of PAS stain of skin biopsy specimens. In this case, the authors mentioned that EGR-like lesions preceded exacerbation of MF and questioned the prognostic significance of the EGR-like eruption in relation to MF.⁶

Holcomb et al⁷ reported the next case of a 75-year-old man with stage IIB MF (T3N0M0B0) with CD25⁺ and CD30⁺ large cell transformation who presented with an EGR-like eruption. In this case, PAS stain and KOH preparations were repeatedly negative for mycotic infection. Disease progression was not mentioned following the appearance of the EGR-like eruption.⁷

Nagase et al⁸ most recently described a case of a 73-year-old Japanese man with stage IB (T2N0M0B0) CD4⁻CD8⁻ MF and lung cancer who developed a cutaneous eruption mimicking EGR. Microscopy and culture excluded the presence of a mycotic infection. The patient achieved partial remission with photochemotherapy (psoralen plus UVA) combined with topical corticosteroids. No major changes in the patient’s skin lesions were noted following surgical resection of the lung cancer.⁸

Dermatophyte Infection
It is known that conventional tinea corporis can occur in the setting of CTCL. However, EGR-like eruptions in CTCL can be distinguished from standard tinea corporis by the classic morphology of EGR and clinical history of rapid migration of these characteristic lesions.

Tinea imbricata is known to have a clinical appearance that is similar to EGR, but the infection is caused by Tinea concentricum, which is limited to southwest Polynesia, Melanesia, Southeast Asia, India, and Central America. Although T rubrum was the dermatophyte isolated by Poonawalla et al,³ Jouary et al,⁵ and in our case, whether T rubrum infection in the setting of CTCL has any impact on prognosis needs further study.

Our case of an EGR-like eruption presented in a patient with SS and tinea corporis. Biopsy specimens showed CTCL and concomitant dermatophytic infection that was confirmed with PAS stain and identified as T rubrum. Interestingly, our patient’s EGR-like eruption cleared with oral terbinafine therapy, consistent with findings described by Poonawalla et al³ and Jouary et al⁵ in which treatment of the dermatophytic infection led to resolution of the EGR-like eruption, suggesting a causative role.

However, testing for dermatophytes was negative in the other reported cases of EGR-like eruptions in patients with MF, despite screening for the presence of fungal microorganisms using KOH preparation, PAS staining, or fungal culture, or a combination of these methods,^3-8 which raises the question: Do the cases reported without dermatophytic infection represent false-negative test results, or can the distinct clinical appearance of EGR indeed be seen in patients with CTCL who lack superimposed dermatophytosis? In 3 prior reported cases of EGR-like eruptions in MF, the eruption was preceded by immunosuppressive therapy.^5-7

Further investigation is needed to correlate the role of dermatophytic infection in EGR-like eruptions. Our case and the Jouary et al⁵ case reported dermatophyte-positive EGR-like eruptions in MF and SS detected with histopathologic analysis and PAS stain. This low-cost screening method should be considered in future cases. If the test result is dermatophyte positive, a 14-day course of oral terbinafine (250 mg/d) might induce resolution of the EGR-like eruption.

Conclusion

The role of dermatophyte-induced EGR or EGR-like eruptions in other settings also warrants further investigation to shed light on this poorly understood yet striking dermatologic condition. Our patient showed both MF and dermatophytes in skin biopsy results, regardless of whether those sites showed erythroderma or EGR-like features clinically. On 3 occasions, antifungal treatment cleared the EGR-like lesions and associated pruritus but not erythroderma. Therefore, it appears that the mere presence of dermatophytes was necessary but not sufficient to produce the EGR-like lesions observed in our case.

Case Report

A 65-year-old woman presented with stage IVA2 mycosis fungoides (MF)(T4N3M0B2)/Sézary syndrome (SS). A peripheral blood count contained 6000 Sézary cells with cerebriform nuclei, a CD2^+/−CD3⁺CD4⁺CD5^+/−CD7⁺CD8⁻CD26⁻immunophenotype, and a highly abnormal CD4 to CD8 ratio (70:1). Positron emission tomography and computed tomography demonstrated hypermetabolic subcutaneous nodules in the base of the neck and generalized lymphadenopathy. Lymph node biopsy showed involvement by T-cell lymphoma and dominant T-cell receptor γ clonality by polymerase chain reaction.

On initial presentation to the Cutaneous Lymphoma Clinic at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the patient was erythrodermic. She also was noted to have undulating wavy bands and concentric annular, ringlike, thin, erythematous plaques with trailing scale, giving a wood grain, zebra hide–like appearance involving the buttocks, abdomen, and lower extremities (Figure 1). Lesions were markedly pruritic and were advancing rapidly. A diagnosis of erythema gyratum repens (EGR)–like eruption was made.

Interferon alfa-2b and methotrexate therapy was initiated. Additionally, oral terbinafine (250 mg/d) was initiated for 14 days, resulting in complete resolution of the EGR-like eruption; nevertheless, diffuse erythema remained. Subsequently, within 3 months of treatment, the cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) improved with continued interferon alfa-2b and methotrexate. Erythroderma became minimal; the circulating Sézary cell count decreased by 50%. The patient ultimately had multiple relapses in erythroderma and progression of SS. Erythema gyratum repens–like lesions recurred on multiple occasions, with a temporary response to repeat courses of oral terbinafine.

Comment

Defining True EGR vs EGR-like Eruption
Sézary syndrome represents the leukemic stage of CTCL, which is defined by the triad of erythroderma; generalized lymphadenopathy; and neoplastic T cells in the skin, lymph nodes, and peripheral blood. It is well known that CTCL can mimic multiple benign and malignant dermatoses. One rare presentation of CTCL is an EGR-like eruption.

Erythema gyratum repens presents as rapidly advancing, erythematous, concentric bands that can be figurate, gyrate, or annular, with a fine trailing edge of scale (wood grain pattern). The diagnosis is based on the characteristic clinical pattern of EGR and by ruling out other mimicking conditions with biopsy.¹ Patients with the characteristic clinical pattern but with an alternate underlying dermatosis are described as having an EGR-like eruption rather than true EGR.

True EGR is most often but not always associated with underlying malignancy. Biopsy of true EGR eruptions show nonspecific histopathologic features, with perivascular superficial mononuclear dermatitis, occasional mild spongiosis, and focal parakeratosis; specific features of an alternate dermatosis are lacking.² In addition to CTCL, EGR-like eruptions have been described in a number of diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, erythema annulare centrifugum, bullous dermatosis, erythrokeratodermia variabilis, urticarial vasculitis, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, and neutrophilic dermatoses.

Prior Reports of EGR-like Eruption in Association With MF
According to a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms erythema gyratum repens in mycosis fungoides, mycosis fungoides with tinea, and concentric wood grain erythema, there have been 6 other cases of an EGR-like eruption in association with MF (Table). Poonawalla et al³ first described an EGR-like eruption (utilizing the term tinea pseudoimbricata) in a 55-year-old man with stage IB MF (T2N0M0B0). The patient had a preceding history of tinea pedis and tinea corporis that preceded the diagnosis of MF. At the time of MF diagnosis, the patient presented with extensive concentric, gyrate, wood grain, annular lesions. His MF was resistant to topical mechlorethamine, psoralen plus UVA, and oral bexarotene. The body surface area involvement decreased from 60% to less than 1% after institution of oral and topical antifungal therapy. It was postulated that the widespread dermatophytosis that preceded the development of MF may have been the persistent antigen leading to his disease. Preceding the diagnosis of MF, skin scrapings were floridly positive for dermatophyte hyphae. Fungal cultures from the affected areas of skin grew T rubrum.³

Moore et al⁴ described an EGR-like eruption on the trunk of a 73-year-old man with stage IA MF (T1N0M0B0). Biopsy was consistent with MF, but no fungal organisms were seen. Potassium hydroxide preparation and fungal cultures of the lesions also were negative for organisms. The patient was successfully treated with topical betamethasone.⁴Jouary et al⁵ described an EGR-like eruption in a 77-year-old man with stage III erythrodermic MF (T4N1M0B0). Biopsy showed mycelia on PAS stain. Subsequent culture isolated T rubrum. Terbinafine (250 mg/d) and ketoconazole cream 2% daily were initiated and the patient’s EGR-like rash quickly cleared, while MF progressed to SS.⁵

Cerri et al⁶ later described a case of EGR-like eruption in a 61-year-old man with stage I MF and an EGR-like eruption. Microscopic examination of potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparations and fungal culture of the lesions failed to demonstrate mycotic infection. There was no mention of PAS stain of skin biopsy specimens. In this case, the authors mentioned that EGR-like lesions preceded exacerbation of MF and questioned the prognostic significance of the EGR-like eruption in relation to MF.⁶

Holcomb et al⁷ reported the next case of a 75-year-old man with stage IIB MF (T3N0M0B0) with CD25⁺ and CD30⁺ large cell transformation who presented with an EGR-like eruption. In this case, PAS stain and KOH preparations were repeatedly negative for mycotic infection. Disease progression was not mentioned following the appearance of the EGR-like eruption.⁷

Nagase et al⁸ most recently described a case of a 73-year-old Japanese man with stage IB (T2N0M0B0) CD4⁻CD8⁻ MF and lung cancer who developed a cutaneous eruption mimicking EGR. Microscopy and culture excluded the presence of a mycotic infection. The patient achieved partial remission with photochemotherapy (psoralen plus UVA) combined with topical corticosteroids. No major changes in the patient’s skin lesions were noted following surgical resection of the lung cancer.⁸

Dermatophyte Infection
It is known that conventional tinea corporis can occur in the setting of CTCL. However, EGR-like eruptions in CTCL can be distinguished from standard tinea corporis by the classic morphology of EGR and clinical history of rapid migration of these characteristic lesions.

Tinea imbricata is known to have a clinical appearance that is similar to EGR, but the infection is caused by Tinea concentricum, which is limited to southwest Polynesia, Melanesia, Southeast Asia, India, and Central America. Although T rubrum was the dermatophyte isolated by Poonawalla et al,³ Jouary et al,⁵ and in our case, whether T rubrum infection in the setting of CTCL has any impact on prognosis needs further study.

Our case of an EGR-like eruption presented in a patient with SS and tinea corporis. Biopsy specimens showed CTCL and concomitant dermatophytic infection that was confirmed with PAS stain and identified as T rubrum. Interestingly, our patient’s EGR-like eruption cleared with oral terbinafine therapy, consistent with findings described by Poonawalla et al³ and Jouary et al⁵ in which treatment of the dermatophytic infection led to resolution of the EGR-like eruption, suggesting a causative role.

However, testing for dermatophytes was negative in the other reported cases of EGR-like eruptions in patients with MF, despite screening for the presence of fungal microorganisms using KOH preparation, PAS staining, or fungal culture, or a combination of these methods,^3-8 which raises the question: Do the cases reported without dermatophytic infection represent false-negative test results, or can the distinct clinical appearance of EGR indeed be seen in patients with CTCL who lack superimposed dermatophytosis? In 3 prior reported cases of EGR-like eruptions in MF, the eruption was preceded by immunosuppressive therapy.^5-7

Further investigation is needed to correlate the role of dermatophytic infection in EGR-like eruptions. Our case and the Jouary et al⁵ case reported dermatophyte-positive EGR-like eruptions in MF and SS detected with histopathologic analysis and PAS stain. This low-cost screening method should be considered in future cases. If the test result is dermatophyte positive, a 14-day course of oral terbinafine (250 mg/d) might induce resolution of the EGR-like eruption.

Conclusion

The role of dermatophyte-induced EGR or EGR-like eruptions in other settings also warrants further investigation to shed light on this poorly understood yet striking dermatologic condition. Our patient showed both MF and dermatophytes in skin biopsy results, regardless of whether those sites showed erythroderma or EGR-like features clinically. On 3 occasions, antifungal treatment cleared the EGR-like lesions and associated pruritus but not erythroderma. Therefore, it appears that the mere presence of dermatophytes was necessary but not sufficient to produce the EGR-like lesions observed in our case.

Many dermatologic procedures are performed on the face, such as skin biopsies, surgical excisions, and cosmetic procedures, which can increase the risk for accidental ocular injuries.^1,2 Ocular chemical burns have been reported to account for approximately 3% to 20% of ocular injuries^3,4 and are one of the few ocular emergencies dermatologists may encounter in practice. Given the potentially severe consequences of permanent vision changes or loss, it is important to take precautionary steps in preventing chemical exposures and know how to appropriately manage ophthalmic emergencies when they occur.^1,5-8 In this article, we describe a patient with a transient ocular chemical injury from exposure to aluminum chloride hexahydrate that completely resolved with immediate care. We also offer practical guidance for the general dermatologist in the acute management of acidic chemical burns to the eye, highlighting immediate copious irrigation as the most important step in preventing severe permanent damage. Given that aluminum chloride hexahydrate is an acidic solution, we focus predominantly on the approach to acidic chemical exposures to the eye.

Case Report

A 61-year-old woman was seen in the dermatology outpatient clinic for a shave biopsy on the left cheek followed by aluminum chloride application for hemostasis. Following the biopsy, the patient stated she felt the sensation that something had dripped into the left eye and she felt a burning pain. There was a 30- to 60-second delay in irrigation of the eye, as it was at first unclear what had occurred. The patient reported an increased burning sensation, and at that point she was instructed to begin flushing the eye with tap water from the examination room sink for 15 to 20 minutes; she wanted to stop irrigation after a few minutes, and convincing her to continue thorough irrigation was somewhat challenging. It was determined that aluminum chloride hexahydrate had dripped from an oversaturated cotton swab in transit from the tray to the biopsy site.

The patient was urgently directed to the ophthalmology clinic and evaluated by an ophthalmologist within 1 to 2 hours of chemical exposure. Visual acuity of the affected left eye was noted to be 20/30 -2 with correctional glasses, and slit lamp examination revealed moderate injection of the conjunctiva and sclera, and at least 3 punctate epithelial erosions and punctate staining of the inferior aspects of the cornea, consistent with a chemical injury. The remaining ocular examination was normal for both eyes. She was diagnosed with keratitis of the left eye from chemical exposure to aluminum chloride and was prescribed loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% and tobramycin ophthalmic solution 0.3% to be applied to the left eye 4 times daily, with follow-up 4 days later.

At follow-up, the patient denied any pain, though she was not using the prescribed eye drops consistently. On examination, the patient showed improvement in visual acuity to 20/20 -2 and complete resolution of the keratitis, with slit lamp examination showing clear conjunctiva, sclera, and cornea. Given complete resolution, the eye drops were discontinued.

Comment

Factors Contributing to Ocular Chemical Injuries
Chemical burns to the eyes during cosmetic or surgical procedures are one of the few acute ocular emergencies dermatologists may encounter in practice. If not managed properly, the eye may be permanently damaged. Therefore, dermatologists must be confident in the initial management of ocular chemical burns (Table 1; Figure).

Mechanism of Ocular Chemical Burns
The extent of injury is predominantly determined by 2 factors: (1) the chemical properties of the substance, and (2) the length of exposure.^5,9,10 Potential chemical exposures and their reported ocular effects are listed in Table 2.^11-21 Alkaline chemical burns often have the gravest outcome, as they can rapidly penetrate into the internal ocular structures, potentially leading to cataracts and glaucoma.⁹ Hydroxyl ions, often found in alkaline chemicals, are capable of rapidly denaturing the corneal matrix and triggering release of proteolytic enzymes through a series of inflammatory responses. Conversely, ocular damage from most acidic chemicals often is limited to the more superficial structures, such as the cornea and conjunctiva, given that acids may cause corneal proteins to coagulate, thus forming a barrier that slows further penetration into deeper structures.⁹ Nonetheless, corneal damage can still have a devastating impact on visual acuity, as the cornea provides 65% to 75% of the eye’s total focusing power.²² For both alkaline and acidic chemicals, immediate profuse irrigation is most critical in determining the clinical course.^23-26 To provide perspective, potent alkaline chemicals may penetrate into the anterior chamber of the eye within 15 seconds,⁹ and delayed initiation of irrigation by even 5 to 15 minutes may lead to irreversible intraocular damage.²⁷

Immediate Management
If potential chemical exposure to the eye is suspected either by the health care provider or patient, immediately irrigate the affected eye(s) for at least 15 to 30 minutes (longer for alkaline burns) with at least 1 to 2 L of irrigation fluid until the pH is between 7 and 7.2.^{3-5,9,27,34,35} Irrigation fluids reported to be used include normal saline, Ringer lactate solution, normal saline with sodium bicarbonate, and balanced salt solution.⁵ If no solutions are readily available, immediate irrigation with tap water is sufficient for diluting and washing away the chemical and has been reported to have better clinical outcomes than delaying irrigation.^5,24-26 Studies have shown that prolonged irrigation corresponded with reduced severity, shortened healing time, shorter in-hospital treatment duration, and quicker return to work.^5,26

If an eye wash station is not available, the patient can gently flush the eye under a sink faucet set to a gentle stream of lukewarm water.^6,7 The health care provider also may manually irrigate the eye. Necessary equipment includes a large syringe or clean eyecup, irrigating fluid, local anesthetic drops for comfort, a towel to soak up excessive fluid, and a bowl or kidney dish to collect the irrigated fluid.³⁴ Providers should first wash their hands. If necessary, anesthetic eye drops may be added for comfort. Lay a towel over the patient’s neck and shoulders and position the patient at a comfortable angle. Place a bowl adjacent to the patient’s cheek to collect the irrigating fluid and have the patient tilt his/her head such that the irrigated fluid would flow into the bowl. Pour a steady stream of the irrigating fluid over the eye from a height of no more than 5 cm.^6,7,34

During irrigation, ensure that the patient’s eye(s) is wide open and that all ocular surfaces, including the area underneath the eyelids, are thoroughly washed; everting the eyelids may be beneficial. Ask the patient to move his/her eye(s) in all directions while irrigating. If available, place a litmus strip in the conjunctival fornix to ensure that the goal pH of 7 to 7.2 is reached.⁹ The pH should be rechecked every 15 to 30 minutes to ensure there has been no change, as hidden crystalized chemical particles may continue to elute chemicals, causing further injury.³ Contact lenses, if present, should be removed as soon as practical, as lenses can trap chemicals; however, immediate initiation of irrigation should not be delayed⁸ (Table 1).

Identify and verify the chemical suspected to have been exposed to the patient’s eye. The material safety data sheet, which may often be found online if a hard copy is not available, may provide valuable information for the ophthalmologist.³⁶ After thorough irrigation, refer the patient urgently to ophthalmology or the emergency department for prompt evaluation. The emergency department is frequently equipped with polymethylmethacrylate scleral lenses, also called Morgan Lens, which consist of a plastic lens connected via tubing to a bag of irrigation fluid (eg, Ringer lactate solution), allowing for prolonged continuous irrigation of the conjunctiva and cornea. The ophthalmologist will conduct a visual acuity test and complete a thorough eye examination to assess the extent of ischemic injury to the conjunctiva or sclera and damage to the corneal epithelium and internal ocular structures.⁹

Generally, topical antibiotics, artificial tears, and topical steroids may be provided to patients with mild injury with close follow-up.^9,37 For higher-grade injuries, broad-spectrum topical antibiotics, oral antibiotics, topical corticosteroids, vitamin C, and surgical treatments may be additionally recommended (Table 3). Long-term follow-up may be recommended by the ophthalmologist to monitor for potential late complications, such as glaucoma from damage to the trabecular meshwork, corneal abnormalities and limbal stem cell deficiency, symblepharon formation, or eyelid abnormalities.⁹

Conclusion

We report a case of a transient chemical burn to the eye secondary to exposure to aluminum chloride hexahydrate. Complete resolution of the injury was achieved with prompt irrigation and urgent medical management by ophthalmology. This case emphasizes the potential for ocular emergencies in the dermatology setting and highlights the steps for appropriate management should a chemical burn to the eye occur. We emphasize the importance of immediate profuse irrigation for 15 to 30 minutes and urgent evaluation by an ophthalmologist. Dermatologists should be cognizant of potential hazards to the eye during facial procedures and always take proper precautions to decrease the risk for ocular injuries.

Many dermatologic procedures are performed on the face, such as skin biopsies, surgical excisions, and cosmetic procedures, which can increase the risk for accidental ocular injuries.^1,2 Ocular chemical burns have been reported to account for approximately 3% to 20% of ocular injuries^3,4 and are one of the few ocular emergencies dermatologists may encounter in practice. Given the potentially severe consequences of permanent vision changes or loss, it is important to take precautionary steps in preventing chemical exposures and know how to appropriately manage ophthalmic emergencies when they occur.^1,5-8 In this article, we describe a patient with a transient ocular chemical injury from exposure to aluminum chloride hexahydrate that completely resolved with immediate care. We also offer practical guidance for the general dermatologist in the acute management of acidic chemical burns to the eye, highlighting immediate copious irrigation as the most important step in preventing severe permanent damage. Given that aluminum chloride hexahydrate is an acidic solution, we focus predominantly on the approach to acidic chemical exposures to the eye.

Case Report

A 61-year-old woman was seen in the dermatology outpatient clinic for a shave biopsy on the left cheek followed by aluminum chloride application for hemostasis. Following the biopsy, the patient stated she felt the sensation that something had dripped into the left eye and she felt a burning pain. There was a 30- to 60-second delay in irrigation of the eye, as it was at first unclear what had occurred. The patient reported an increased burning sensation, and at that point she was instructed to begin flushing the eye with tap water from the examination room sink for 15 to 20 minutes; she wanted to stop irrigation after a few minutes, and convincing her to continue thorough irrigation was somewhat challenging. It was determined that aluminum chloride hexahydrate had dripped from an oversaturated cotton swab in transit from the tray to the biopsy site.

The patient was urgently directed to the ophthalmology clinic and evaluated by an ophthalmologist within 1 to 2 hours of chemical exposure. Visual acuity of the affected left eye was noted to be 20/30 -2 with correctional glasses, and slit lamp examination revealed moderate injection of the conjunctiva and sclera, and at least 3 punctate epithelial erosions and punctate staining of the inferior aspects of the cornea, consistent with a chemical injury. The remaining ocular examination was normal for both eyes. She was diagnosed with keratitis of the left eye from chemical exposure to aluminum chloride and was prescribed loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% and tobramycin ophthalmic solution 0.3% to be applied to the left eye 4 times daily, with follow-up 4 days later.

At follow-up, the patient denied any pain, though she was not using the prescribed eye drops consistently. On examination, the patient showed improvement in visual acuity to 20/20 -2 and complete resolution of the keratitis, with slit lamp examination showing clear conjunctiva, sclera, and cornea. Given complete resolution, the eye drops were discontinued.

Comment

Factors Contributing to Ocular Chemical Injuries
Chemical burns to the eyes during cosmetic or surgical procedures are one of the few acute ocular emergencies dermatologists may encounter in practice. If not managed properly, the eye may be permanently damaged. Therefore, dermatologists must be confident in the initial management of ocular chemical burns (Table 1; Figure).

Mechanism of Ocular Chemical Burns
The extent of injury is predominantly determined by 2 factors: (1) the chemical properties of the substance, and (2) the length of exposure.^5,9,10 Potential chemical exposures and their reported ocular effects are listed in Table 2.^11-21 Alkaline chemical burns often have the gravest outcome, as they can rapidly penetrate into the internal ocular structures, potentially leading to cataracts and glaucoma.⁹ Hydroxyl ions, often found in alkaline chemicals, are capable of rapidly denaturing the corneal matrix and triggering release of proteolytic enzymes through a series of inflammatory responses. Conversely, ocular damage from most acidic chemicals often is limited to the more superficial structures, such as the cornea and conjunctiva, given that acids may cause corneal proteins to coagulate, thus forming a barrier that slows further penetration into deeper structures.⁹ Nonetheless, corneal damage can still have a devastating impact on visual acuity, as the cornea provides 65% to 75% of the eye’s total focusing power.²² For both alkaline and acidic chemicals, immediate profuse irrigation is most critical in determining the clinical course.^23-26 To provide perspective, potent alkaline chemicals may penetrate into the anterior chamber of the eye within 15 seconds,⁹ and delayed initiation of irrigation by even 5 to 15 minutes may lead to irreversible intraocular damage.²⁷

Immediate Management
If potential chemical exposure to the eye is suspected either by the health care provider or patient, immediately irrigate the affected eye(s) for at least 15 to 30 minutes (longer for alkaline burns) with at least 1 to 2 L of irrigation fluid until the pH is between 7 and 7.2.^{3-5,9,27,34,35} Irrigation fluids reported to be used include normal saline, Ringer lactate solution, normal saline with sodium bicarbonate, and balanced salt solution.⁵ If no solutions are readily available, immediate irrigation with tap water is sufficient for diluting and washing away the chemical and has been reported to have better clinical outcomes than delaying irrigation.^5,24-26 Studies have shown that prolonged irrigation corresponded with reduced severity, shortened healing time, shorter in-hospital treatment duration, and quicker return to work.^5,26

If an eye wash station is not available, the patient can gently flush the eye under a sink faucet set to a gentle stream of lukewarm water.^6,7 The health care provider also may manually irrigate the eye. Necessary equipment includes a large syringe or clean eyecup, irrigating fluid, local anesthetic drops for comfort, a towel to soak up excessive fluid, and a bowl or kidney dish to collect the irrigated fluid.³⁴ Providers should first wash their hands. If necessary, anesthetic eye drops may be added for comfort. Lay a towel over the patient’s neck and shoulders and position the patient at a comfortable angle. Place a bowl adjacent to the patient’s cheek to collect the irrigating fluid and have the patient tilt his/her head such that the irrigated fluid would flow into the bowl. Pour a steady stream of the irrigating fluid over the eye from a height of no more than 5 cm.^6,7,34

During irrigation, ensure that the patient’s eye(s) is wide open and that all ocular surfaces, including the area underneath the eyelids, are thoroughly washed; everting the eyelids may be beneficial. Ask the patient to move his/her eye(s) in all directions while irrigating. If available, place a litmus strip in the conjunctival fornix to ensure that the goal pH of 7 to 7.2 is reached.⁹ The pH should be rechecked every 15 to 30 minutes to ensure there has been no change, as hidden crystalized chemical particles may continue to elute chemicals, causing further injury.³ Contact lenses, if present, should be removed as soon as practical, as lenses can trap chemicals; however, immediate initiation of irrigation should not be delayed⁸ (Table 1).

Identify and verify the chemical suspected to have been exposed to the patient’s eye. The material safety data sheet, which may often be found online if a hard copy is not available, may provide valuable information for the ophthalmologist.³⁶ After thorough irrigation, refer the patient urgently to ophthalmology or the emergency department for prompt evaluation. The emergency department is frequently equipped with polymethylmethacrylate scleral lenses, also called Morgan Lens, which consist of a plastic lens connected via tubing to a bag of irrigation fluid (eg, Ringer lactate solution), allowing for prolonged continuous irrigation of the conjunctiva and cornea. The ophthalmologist will conduct a visual acuity test and complete a thorough eye examination to assess the extent of ischemic injury to the conjunctiva or sclera and damage to the corneal epithelium and internal ocular structures.⁹

Generally, topical antibiotics, artificial tears, and topical steroids may be provided to patients with mild injury with close follow-up.^9,37 For higher-grade injuries, broad-spectrum topical antibiotics, oral antibiotics, topical corticosteroids, vitamin C, and surgical treatments may be additionally recommended (Table 3). Long-term follow-up may be recommended by the ophthalmologist to monitor for potential late complications, such as glaucoma from damage to the trabecular meshwork, corneal abnormalities and limbal stem cell deficiency, symblepharon formation, or eyelid abnormalities.⁹

Conclusion

We report a case of a transient chemical burn to the eye secondary to exposure to aluminum chloride hexahydrate. Complete resolution of the injury was achieved with prompt irrigation and urgent medical management by ophthalmology. This case emphasizes the potential for ocular emergencies in the dermatology setting and highlights the steps for appropriate management should a chemical burn to the eye occur. We emphasize the importance of immediate profuse irrigation for 15 to 30 minutes and urgent evaluation by an ophthalmologist. Dermatologists should be cognizant of potential hazards to the eye during facial procedures and always take proper precautions to decrease the risk for ocular injuries.

Many dermatologic procedures are performed on the face, such as skin biopsies, surgical excisions, and cosmetic procedures, which can increase the risk for accidental ocular injuries.^1,2 Ocular chemical burns have been reported to account for approximately 3% to 20% of ocular injuries^3,4 and are one of the few ocular emergencies dermatologists may encounter in practice. Given the potentially severe consequences of permanent vision changes or loss, it is important to take precautionary steps in preventing chemical exposures and know how to appropriately manage ophthalmic emergencies when they occur.^1,5-8 In this article, we describe a patient with a transient ocular chemical injury from exposure to aluminum chloride hexahydrate that completely resolved with immediate care. We also offer practical guidance for the general dermatologist in the acute management of acidic chemical burns to the eye, highlighting immediate copious irrigation as the most important step in preventing severe permanent damage. Given that aluminum chloride hexahydrate is an acidic solution, we focus predominantly on the approach to acidic chemical exposures to the eye.

Case Report

A 61-year-old woman was seen in the dermatology outpatient clinic for a shave biopsy on the left cheek followed by aluminum chloride application for hemostasis. Following the biopsy, the patient stated she felt the sensation that something had dripped into the left eye and she felt a burning pain. There was a 30- to 60-second delay in irrigation of the eye, as it was at first unclear what had occurred. The patient reported an increased burning sensation, and at that point she was instructed to begin flushing the eye with tap water from the examination room sink for 15 to 20 minutes; she wanted to stop irrigation after a few minutes, and convincing her to continue thorough irrigation was somewhat challenging. It was determined that aluminum chloride hexahydrate had dripped from an oversaturated cotton swab in transit from the tray to the biopsy site.

The patient was urgently directed to the ophthalmology clinic and evaluated by an ophthalmologist within 1 to 2 hours of chemical exposure. Visual acuity of the affected left eye was noted to be 20/30 -2 with correctional glasses, and slit lamp examination revealed moderate injection of the conjunctiva and sclera, and at least 3 punctate epithelial erosions and punctate staining of the inferior aspects of the cornea, consistent with a chemical injury. The remaining ocular examination was normal for both eyes. She was diagnosed with keratitis of the left eye from chemical exposure to aluminum chloride and was prescribed loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% and tobramycin ophthalmic solution 0.3% to be applied to the left eye 4 times daily, with follow-up 4 days later.

At follow-up, the patient denied any pain, though she was not using the prescribed eye drops consistently. On examination, the patient showed improvement in visual acuity to 20/20 -2 and complete resolution of the keratitis, with slit lamp examination showing clear conjunctiva, sclera, and cornea. Given complete resolution, the eye drops were discontinued.

Comment

Factors Contributing to Ocular Chemical Injuries
Chemical burns to the eyes during cosmetic or surgical procedures are one of the few acute ocular emergencies dermatologists may encounter in practice. If not managed properly, the eye may be permanently damaged. Therefore, dermatologists must be confident in the initial management of ocular chemical burns (Table 1; Figure).

Mechanism of Ocular Chemical Burns
The extent of injury is predominantly determined by 2 factors: (1) the chemical properties of the substance, and (2) the length of exposure.^5,9,10 Potential chemical exposures and their reported ocular effects are listed in Table 2.^11-21 Alkaline chemical burns often have the gravest outcome, as they can rapidly penetrate into the internal ocular structures, potentially leading to cataracts and glaucoma.⁹ Hydroxyl ions, often found in alkaline chemicals, are capable of rapidly denaturing the corneal matrix and triggering release of proteolytic enzymes through a series of inflammatory responses. Conversely, ocular damage from most acidic chemicals often is limited to the more superficial structures, such as the cornea and conjunctiva, given that acids may cause corneal proteins to coagulate, thus forming a barrier that slows further penetration into deeper structures.⁹ Nonetheless, corneal damage can still have a devastating impact on visual acuity, as the cornea provides 65% to 75% of the eye’s total focusing power.²² For both alkaline and acidic chemicals, immediate profuse irrigation is most critical in determining the clinical course.^23-26 To provide perspective, potent alkaline chemicals may penetrate into the anterior chamber of the eye within 15 seconds,⁹ and delayed initiation of irrigation by even 5 to 15 minutes may lead to irreversible intraocular damage.²⁷

Immediate Management
If potential chemical exposure to the eye is suspected either by the health care provider or patient, immediately irrigate the affected eye(s) for at least 15 to 30 minutes (longer for alkaline burns) with at least 1 to 2 L of irrigation fluid until the pH is between 7 and 7.2.^{3-5,9,27,34,35} Irrigation fluids reported to be used include normal saline, Ringer lactate solution, normal saline with sodium bicarbonate, and balanced salt solution.⁵ If no solutions are readily available, immediate irrigation with tap water is sufficient for diluting and washing away the chemical and has been reported to have better clinical outcomes than delaying irrigation.^5,24-26 Studies have shown that prolonged irrigation corresponded with reduced severity, shortened healing time, shorter in-hospital treatment duration, and quicker return to work.^5,26

If an eye wash station is not available, the patient can gently flush the eye under a sink faucet set to a gentle stream of lukewarm water.^6,7 The health care provider also may manually irrigate the eye. Necessary equipment includes a large syringe or clean eyecup, irrigating fluid, local anesthetic drops for comfort, a towel to soak up excessive fluid, and a bowl or kidney dish to collect the irrigated fluid.³⁴ Providers should first wash their hands. If necessary, anesthetic eye drops may be added for comfort. Lay a towel over the patient’s neck and shoulders and position the patient at a comfortable angle. Place a bowl adjacent to the patient’s cheek to collect the irrigating fluid and have the patient tilt his/her head such that the irrigated fluid would flow into the bowl. Pour a steady stream of the irrigating fluid over the eye from a height of no more than 5 cm.^6,7,34

During irrigation, ensure that the patient’s eye(s) is wide open and that all ocular surfaces, including the area underneath the eyelids, are thoroughly washed; everting the eyelids may be beneficial. Ask the patient to move his/her eye(s) in all directions while irrigating. If available, place a litmus strip in the conjunctival fornix to ensure that the goal pH of 7 to 7.2 is reached.⁹ The pH should be rechecked every 15 to 30 minutes to ensure there has been no change, as hidden crystalized chemical particles may continue to elute chemicals, causing further injury.³ Contact lenses, if present, should be removed as soon as practical, as lenses can trap chemicals; however, immediate initiation of irrigation should not be delayed⁸ (Table 1).

Identify and verify the chemical suspected to have been exposed to the patient’s eye. The material safety data sheet, which may often be found online if a hard copy is not available, may provide valuable information for the ophthalmologist.³⁶ After thorough irrigation, refer the patient urgently to ophthalmology or the emergency department for prompt evaluation. The emergency department is frequently equipped with polymethylmethacrylate scleral lenses, also called Morgan Lens, which consist of a plastic lens connected via tubing to a bag of irrigation fluid (eg, Ringer lactate solution), allowing for prolonged continuous irrigation of the conjunctiva and cornea. The ophthalmologist will conduct a visual acuity test and complete a thorough eye examination to assess the extent of ischemic injury to the conjunctiva or sclera and damage to the corneal epithelium and internal ocular structures.⁹

Generally, topical antibiotics, artificial tears, and topical steroids may be provided to patients with mild injury with close follow-up.^9,37 For higher-grade injuries, broad-spectrum topical antibiotics, oral antibiotics, topical corticosteroids, vitamin C, and surgical treatments may be additionally recommended (Table 3). Long-term follow-up may be recommended by the ophthalmologist to monitor for potential late complications, such as glaucoma from damage to the trabecular meshwork, corneal abnormalities and limbal stem cell deficiency, symblepharon formation, or eyelid abnormalities.⁹

Conclusion

We report a case of a transient chemical burn to the eye secondary to exposure to aluminum chloride hexahydrate. Complete resolution of the injury was achieved with prompt irrigation and urgent medical management by ophthalmology. This case emphasizes the potential for ocular emergencies in the dermatology setting and highlights the steps for appropriate management should a chemical burn to the eye occur. We emphasize the importance of immediate profuse irrigation for 15 to 30 minutes and urgent evaluation by an ophthalmologist. Dermatologists should be cognizant of potential hazards to the eye during facial procedures and always take proper precautions to decrease the risk for ocular injuries.

Case Report

A 53-year-old woman presented for an initial visit to the dermatology clinic for a growth under the right fifth fingernail of 1 year’s duration. She had no history of trauma to the digit or pain or bleeding. She self-treated with over-the-counter wart remover for several months without improvement. She reported no other skin concerns. She had a medical history of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and basal cell carcinoma of the nose; she was taking methotrexate and adalimumab for the RA. She had a family history of melanoma in her father.

On physical examination, a firm nontender nodule was noted on the distal nail bed of the right fifth fingernail with onycholysis; the nail plate was otherwise intact (Figure 1). All other nails were normal. A plain radiograph of the involved digit showed no bony abnormality. Excisional biopsy of the nodule was performed and analyzed by histopathology (Figure 2). The biopsy specimen showed a benign epidermis that was acanthotic and surmounted by hyperkeratotic scale. The dermis was fibrotic with collagen bundles assuming a vertical orientation to the long axis of the epidermis, typical of a fibrokeratoma. There were no atypical features in the dermal component or epidermis (Figure 2). These findings were consistent with the diagnosis of acquired digital fibrokeratoma (ADF). The patient tolerated excisional biopsy well and had no evidence of recurrence 4 months following excision.

Comment

History and Clinical Presentation
First described by Bart et al¹ in 1968, ADF is a rare benign fibrous tumor localized to the nail bed or periungual area.¹ Typically, it presents as a solitary flesh-colored papule measuring 3 to 5 mm in diameter. It can be keratotic with a surrounding collarette of elevated skin. Acquired digital fibrokeratoma usually is localized to the digits of the hands or feet; when presenting subungually, it is more commonly found arising from the proximal matrix or nail bed of the great toe. Observed nail changes include longitudinal grooves, trachyonychia, subungual hyperkeratosis, and onycholysis.² The affected nail can be painful, depending on the size and location of the tumor.

Acquired digital fibrokeratoma is more commonly found in middle-aged men; however, it has been reported among patients of various ages and in both sexes.^1,3 In a study of 20 cases, the average duration before presenting for medical advice was 28 months.² Acquired digital fibrokeratoma arises sporadically; some patients report prior local trauma. Lesions typically do not self-resolve.

Diagnosis
The diagnosis of ADF is made using a combination of clinical and histopathological findings. Dermoscopy is helpful and may show homogenous white or milky white structures, likely representing hyperkeratosis, proliferation of capillaries, and an increase in collagen bundles with a surrounding collarette of scale.^4,5 Histopathology shows acanthosis and hyperkeratosis of the epidermis. Collagen bundles assume a characteristic vertical orientation to the long axis of the epidermis.

Two other histomorphologic subtypes, less common than the type I variant, are the type II variant, in which the number of fibroblasts is increased and the number of elastic fibers is decreased, and the type III variant, in which the stroma are edematous and cell poor. There is an even greater reduction in elastic tissue content in the type III variant than in the type I variant. There is evidence that type II ADFs exhibit more hyperkeratosis clinically than the other 2 subtypes, but from a practical perspective, this subclassification is not conducted in routine practice because it does not have clinical significance.⁵

Differential Diagnosis
The clinical differential diagnosis of ADF is broad and includes squamous cell carcinoma, onychomatricoma, onychopapilloma, verruca vulgaris, supernumerary digit, neurofibroma, cellular digital fibroma, and Koenen tumor (periungual fibroma). Almost all of these entities are easily differentiated from ADF on biopsy. A fibrokeratoma does not exhibit the atypia seen in squamous cell carcinoma. The multiple fibroepithelial projections and nail plate perforations characteristic of onychomatricoma are not observed in ADF. Onychopapilloma shows acanthosis and papillomatosis, similar to ADF; however, onychopapilloma lacks the characteristic vertical orientation of collagen in ADF. Verruca vulgaris classically shows koilocytosis, dilated blood vessels in papillae, and hypergranulosis. A supernumerary digit clinically lacks a collarette of scale and often presents in a bilateral fashion on the lateral fifth digits in children; histopathologically, a supernumerary digit is distinct from an ADF in that nerve bundles are abundant in the dermis, defining a form of amputation neuroma. Neurofibroma exhibits a spindle cell proliferation that assumes a patternless disposition in the dermis, accompanied by mucin, mast cells, and delicate collagen. The defining cell populace has a typical serpiginous nuclear outline that is characteristic of a Schwann cell. Cellular digital fibroma can present similar to ADF; it is considered by some to be a mucin-poor variant of superficial acral fibromyxoma. Its morphology is distinct: a proliferation of bland-appearing spindled cells exhibiting a storiform or fascicular growth pattern and CD34 positivity.

The differential diagnosis to consider when ADF is suspected is a Koenen tumor, which resembles a fibrokeratoma clinically and also is localized to the digits. Koenen tumors can be differentiated from fibrokeratoma by its association with tuberous sclerosis; a multiple, rather than solitary, presentation; a distinctive clove-shaped gross appearance; and an appearance on histopathology of stellate-shaped fibroblasts with occasional giant cells. Despite these important differences, Koenen tumor does exhibit a striking morphologic similarity to ADF, given that the vertical orientation of collagen bundles in Koenen tumor is virtually identical to ADF.⁶

Management
There are no known associations between ADF and medication use, including methotrexate and adalimumab, which our patient was taking; additionally, no association with RA or other systemic disorder has been reported.² The preferred treatment of ADF is complete excision to the basal attachment of the tumor; recurrence is uncommon. Alternative therapies include destructive methods, such as cryotherapy, CO₂ laser ablation, and electrodesiccation.²

Case Report

A 53-year-old woman presented for an initial visit to the dermatology clinic for a growth under the right fifth fingernail of 1 year’s duration. She had no history of trauma to the digit or pain or bleeding. She self-treated with over-the-counter wart remover for several months without improvement. She reported no other skin concerns. She had a medical history of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and basal cell carcinoma of the nose; she was taking methotrexate and adalimumab for the RA. She had a family history of melanoma in her father.

On physical examination, a firm nontender nodule was noted on the distal nail bed of the right fifth fingernail with onycholysis; the nail plate was otherwise intact (Figure 1). All other nails were normal. A plain radiograph of the involved digit showed no bony abnormality. Excisional biopsy of the nodule was performed and analyzed by histopathology (Figure 2). The biopsy specimen showed a benign epidermis that was acanthotic and surmounted by hyperkeratotic scale. The dermis was fibrotic with collagen bundles assuming a vertical orientation to the long axis of the epidermis, typical of a fibrokeratoma. There were no atypical features in the dermal component or epidermis (Figure 2). These findings were consistent with the diagnosis of acquired digital fibrokeratoma (ADF). The patient tolerated excisional biopsy well and had no evidence of recurrence 4 months following excision.

Comment

History and Clinical Presentation
First described by Bart et al¹ in 1968, ADF is a rare benign fibrous tumor localized to the nail bed or periungual area.¹ Typically, it presents as a solitary flesh-colored papule measuring 3 to 5 mm in diameter. It can be keratotic with a surrounding collarette of elevated skin. Acquired digital fibrokeratoma usually is localized to the digits of the hands or feet; when presenting subungually, it is more commonly found arising from the proximal matrix or nail bed of the great toe. Observed nail changes include longitudinal grooves, trachyonychia, subungual hyperkeratosis, and onycholysis.² The affected nail can be painful, depending on the size and location of the tumor.

Acquired digital fibrokeratoma is more commonly found in middle-aged men; however, it has been reported among patients of various ages and in both sexes.^1,3 In a study of 20 cases, the average duration before presenting for medical advice was 28 months.² Acquired digital fibrokeratoma arises sporadically; some patients report prior local trauma. Lesions typically do not self-resolve.

Diagnosis
The diagnosis of ADF is made using a combination of clinical and histopathological findings. Dermoscopy is helpful and may show homogenous white or milky white structures, likely representing hyperkeratosis, proliferation of capillaries, and an increase in collagen bundles with a surrounding collarette of scale.^4,5 Histopathology shows acanthosis and hyperkeratosis of the epidermis. Collagen bundles assume a characteristic vertical orientation to the long axis of the epidermis.

Two other histomorphologic subtypes, less common than the type I variant, are the type II variant, in which the number of fibroblasts is increased and the number of elastic fibers is decreased, and the type III variant, in which the stroma are edematous and cell poor. There is an even greater reduction in elastic tissue content in the type III variant than in the type I variant. There is evidence that type II ADFs exhibit more hyperkeratosis clinically than the other 2 subtypes, but from a practical perspective, this subclassification is not conducted in routine practice because it does not have clinical significance.⁵

Differential Diagnosis
The clinical differential diagnosis of ADF is broad and includes squamous cell carcinoma, onychomatricoma, onychopapilloma, verruca vulgaris, supernumerary digit, neurofibroma, cellular digital fibroma, and Koenen tumor (periungual fibroma). Almost all of these entities are easily differentiated from ADF on biopsy. A fibrokeratoma does not exhibit the atypia seen in squamous cell carcinoma. The multiple fibroepithelial projections and nail plate perforations characteristic of onychomatricoma are not observed in ADF. Onychopapilloma shows acanthosis and papillomatosis, similar to ADF; however, onychopapilloma lacks the characteristic vertical orientation of collagen in ADF. Verruca vulgaris classically shows koilocytosis, dilated blood vessels in papillae, and hypergranulosis. A supernumerary digit clinically lacks a collarette of scale and often presents in a bilateral fashion on the lateral fifth digits in children; histopathologically, a supernumerary digit is distinct from an ADF in that nerve bundles are abundant in the dermis, defining a form of amputation neuroma. Neurofibroma exhibits a spindle cell proliferation that assumes a patternless disposition in the dermis, accompanied by mucin, mast cells, and delicate collagen. The defining cell populace has a typical serpiginous nuclear outline that is characteristic of a Schwann cell. Cellular digital fibroma can present similar to ADF; it is considered by some to be a mucin-poor variant of superficial acral fibromyxoma. Its morphology is distinct: a proliferation of bland-appearing spindled cells exhibiting a storiform or fascicular growth pattern and CD34 positivity.

The differential diagnosis to consider when ADF is suspected is a Koenen tumor, which resembles a fibrokeratoma clinically and also is localized to the digits. Koenen tumors can be differentiated from fibrokeratoma by its association with tuberous sclerosis; a multiple, rather than solitary, presentation; a distinctive clove-shaped gross appearance; and an appearance on histopathology of stellate-shaped fibroblasts with occasional giant cells. Despite these important differences, Koenen tumor does exhibit a striking morphologic similarity to ADF, given that the vertical orientation of collagen bundles in Koenen tumor is virtually identical to ADF.⁶

Management
There are no known associations between ADF and medication use, including methotrexate and adalimumab, which our patient was taking; additionally, no association with RA or other systemic disorder has been reported.² The preferred treatment of ADF is complete excision to the basal attachment of the tumor; recurrence is uncommon. Alternative therapies include destructive methods, such as cryotherapy, CO₂ laser ablation, and electrodesiccation.²

Case Report

A 53-year-old woman presented for an initial visit to the dermatology clinic for a growth under the right fifth fingernail of 1 year’s duration. She had no history of trauma to the digit or pain or bleeding. She self-treated with over-the-counter wart remover for several months without improvement. She reported no other skin concerns. She had a medical history of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and basal cell carcinoma of the nose; she was taking methotrexate and adalimumab for the RA. She had a family history of melanoma in her father.

On physical examination, a firm nontender nodule was noted on the distal nail bed of the right fifth fingernail with onycholysis; the nail plate was otherwise intact (Figure 1). All other nails were normal. A plain radiograph of the involved digit showed no bony abnormality. Excisional biopsy of the nodule was performed and analyzed by histopathology (Figure 2). The biopsy specimen showed a benign epidermis that was acanthotic and surmounted by hyperkeratotic scale. The dermis was fibrotic with collagen bundles assuming a vertical orientation to the long axis of the epidermis, typical of a fibrokeratoma. There were no atypical features in the dermal component or epidermis (Figure 2). These findings were consistent with the diagnosis of acquired digital fibrokeratoma (ADF). The patient tolerated excisional biopsy well and had no evidence of recurrence 4 months following excision.

Comment

History and Clinical Presentation
First described by Bart et al¹ in 1968, ADF is a rare benign fibrous tumor localized to the nail bed or periungual area.¹ Typically, it presents as a solitary flesh-colored papule measuring 3 to 5 mm in diameter. It can be keratotic with a surrounding collarette of elevated skin. Acquired digital fibrokeratoma usually is localized to the digits of the hands or feet; when presenting subungually, it is more commonly found arising from the proximal matrix or nail bed of the great toe. Observed nail changes include longitudinal grooves, trachyonychia, subungual hyperkeratosis, and onycholysis.² The affected nail can be painful, depending on the size and location of the tumor.

Acquired digital fibrokeratoma is more commonly found in middle-aged men; however, it has been reported among patients of various ages and in both sexes.^1,3 In a study of 20 cases, the average duration before presenting for medical advice was 28 months.² Acquired digital fibrokeratoma arises sporadically; some patients report prior local trauma. Lesions typically do not self-resolve.

Diagnosis
The diagnosis of ADF is made using a combination of clinical and histopathological findings. Dermoscopy is helpful and may show homogenous white or milky white structures, likely representing hyperkeratosis, proliferation of capillaries, and an increase in collagen bundles with a surrounding collarette of scale.^4,5 Histopathology shows acanthosis and hyperkeratosis of the epidermis. Collagen bundles assume a characteristic vertical orientation to the long axis of the epidermis.

Two other histomorphologic subtypes, less common than the type I variant, are the type II variant, in which the number of fibroblasts is increased and the number of elastic fibers is decreased, and the type III variant, in which the stroma are edematous and cell poor. There is an even greater reduction in elastic tissue content in the type III variant than in the type I variant. There is evidence that type II ADFs exhibit more hyperkeratosis clinically than the other 2 subtypes, but from a practical perspective, this subclassification is not conducted in routine practice because it does not have clinical significance.⁵

Differential Diagnosis
The clinical differential diagnosis of ADF is broad and includes squamous cell carcinoma, onychomatricoma, onychopapilloma, verruca vulgaris, supernumerary digit, neurofibroma, cellular digital fibroma, and Koenen tumor (periungual fibroma). Almost all of these entities are easily differentiated from ADF on biopsy. A fibrokeratoma does not exhibit the atypia seen in squamous cell carcinoma. The multiple fibroepithelial projections and nail plate perforations characteristic of onychomatricoma are not observed in ADF. Onychopapilloma shows acanthosis and papillomatosis, similar to ADF; however, onychopapilloma lacks the characteristic vertical orientation of collagen in ADF. Verruca vulgaris classically shows koilocytosis, dilated blood vessels in papillae, and hypergranulosis. A supernumerary digit clinically lacks a collarette of scale and often presents in a bilateral fashion on the lateral fifth digits in children; histopathologically, a supernumerary digit is distinct from an ADF in that nerve bundles are abundant in the dermis, defining a form of amputation neuroma. Neurofibroma exhibits a spindle cell proliferation that assumes a patternless disposition in the dermis, accompanied by mucin, mast cells, and delicate collagen. The defining cell populace has a typical serpiginous nuclear outline that is characteristic of a Schwann cell. Cellular digital fibroma can present similar to ADF; it is considered by some to be a mucin-poor variant of superficial acral fibromyxoma. Its morphology is distinct: a proliferation of bland-appearing spindled cells exhibiting a storiform or fascicular growth pattern and CD34 positivity.

The differential diagnosis to consider when ADF is suspected is a Koenen tumor, which resembles a fibrokeratoma clinically and also is localized to the digits. Koenen tumors can be differentiated from fibrokeratoma by its association with tuberous sclerosis; a multiple, rather than solitary, presentation; a distinctive clove-shaped gross appearance; and an appearance on histopathology of stellate-shaped fibroblasts with occasional giant cells. Despite these important differences, Koenen tumor does exhibit a striking morphologic similarity to ADF, given that the vertical orientation of collagen bundles in Koenen tumor is virtually identical to ADF.⁶

Management
There are no known associations between ADF and medication use, including methotrexate and adalimumab, which our patient was taking; additionally, no association with RA or other systemic disorder has been reported.² The preferred treatment of ADF is complete excision to the basal attachment of the tumor; recurrence is uncommon. Alternative therapies include destructive methods, such as cryotherapy, CO₂ laser ablation, and electrodesiccation.²

To the Editor:

A 68-year-old white man presented with a firm, gradually enlarging, mildly tender, grayish black papule with central ulceration on the left dorsal wrist of 4 months’ duration (Figure 1). His relevant medical history included multiple basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and squamous cell carcinomas, as well as a single-lung transplant 2 years prior, for which he was on chronic immunosuppressive therapy with azathioprine, everolimus, tacrolimus, and prednisone. The clinical differential diagnosis included pigmented BCC, malignant melanoma, and ulcerated squamous cell carcinoma.

Histologic examination of the lesion (Figure 2) demonstrated irregular nodules of basaloid tumor cells with rounded nuclei, visible nucleoli, and scant cytoplasm involving the dermis. The tumor produced abrupt matrical-type keratinization, forming ghost cells. The lesion also contained frequent mitotic figures, apoptotic cells, focal areas of necrosis, and abundant melanin pigment. Admixed throughout the lesion were pigmented and dendritic melanocytic cells. The overlying epidermis was focally ulcerated with an adjacent localized connection between the tumor and the epidermis. Keratinocyte atypia was found in the surrounding epidermis, which contained melanophages, solar elastosis, and scattered chronic inflammatory cells. An immunohistochemical study (Figure 3) for tyrosinase demonstrated abundant admixed melanocytic cells. β-Catenin expression was shown in both nuclear and cytoplasmic distributions, and there was focal labeling on BerEP4 staining. Based on these findings, a diagnosis of melanocytic matrical carcinoma (MMC) was made.

Melanocytic matricoma (MM), a rare adnexal tumor, was first described in 1999 by Carlson et al.¹ A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms melanocytic and matricoma yielded 24 reported cases in the English-language literature.^1-17 It consists of an admixed population of basaloid matrical and supramatrical cells, ghost cells, and dendritic melanocytes in a well-circumscribed dermal nodule, typically without epidermal or adnexal connection. In comparison to the more commonly described pilomatricoma, which can be uncommonly pigmented, MM typically has only focal areas of ghost cells and lacks cystic architecture.^1,9,10,18 A granulomatous reaction to keratinaceous debris is variably present.^1,9,10 Histologically, the scattered dendritic melanocytes are classically benign, but cases demonstrating melanocyte atypia have been reported.^10,13 Melanocytic matricoma appears most commonly as a black or gray papule on sun-damaged skin in older men and tends not to recur following complete excision; thus, MM is considered to be a clinically benign neoplasm. Given the demographics and distribution of the lesions, exposure to UV radiation is thought to play a contributory role in the pathogenesis.^2,10,19 Melanocytic matricoma is believed to recapitulate the hair follicle in the anagen phase, where there is close interplay between matrical keratinocytes and melanocytes prior to cessation of melanogenesis during the catagen phase.^5,6,8,20,21 Evidence demonstrating highly conserved β-catenin and downstream lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF1) expression, as well as pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 1 (PHLDA1) expression (as a marker for follicular stem cells), points to constitutive activity in the Wnt signaling pathway in follicular stem cells of the bulge area as a major agent of tumorigenesis.¹²

Melanocytic matrical carcinoma, also known as malignant MM or matrical carcinoma with melanocytic hyperplasia, may be considered the malignant counterpart to MM.²² A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms melanocytic matrical carcinoma, malignant melanocytic matricoma, and matrical carcinoma with melanocytic hyperplasia, with review of references to identify additional citations, yielded 13 reported cases of MMC in the English-language literature (Table).^19,22-30 As with MM, MMC is a biphasic tumor with basaloid matrical and supramatrical cells; focal areas of ghost cells; and admixed, banal-appearing dendritic melanocytes. However, the basaloid component also demonstrates nuclear atypia, mitoses, occasional ulceration, and variably poor circumscription. Clinically these lesions can mimic pigmented BCC, malignant melanoma, or other malignant adnexal tumors.²⁵ Their natural history is unknown due to few reported cases, but they can be correlated with matrical carcinomas, which were first described by Weedon et al³¹ in 1980. A summary of more than 130 cases of matrical carcinomas in the English-language literature found that MMCs have high rates of local recurrence and metastasize in approximately 13% of cases. Wide local excision demonstrated lower rates of recurrence than simple excision (23% vs 83%), but there were insufficient cases to determine the incidence following Mohs micrographic surgery.³² Melanocytic matrical carcinomas also demonstrate mutations in the β-catenin pathway,pointing to a similar pathogenesis as their benign counterparts or perhaps direct malignant transformation.^25,33,34

A subset of MMCs are combined cutaneous tumors (CCTs) consisting of epithelial neoplasms in close association with malignant melanocytes. Two of the more common variants include dermal squamomelanocytic tumors, a term first used by Pool et al,³⁵ and malignant basomelanocytic tumors, as named by Erickson et al,³⁶ but trichoblastomelanomas and other types have been documented.³⁷ Although CCTs typically occur in the same patient populations as MMCs, namely elderly white men with chronically sun-damaged skin,they exhibit several important distinctions.^37-39 By definition, CCTs have a malignant melanocytic component, whereas melanocytes are nonneoplastic in MMCs. The pathogenesis may differ as well. Various mechanisms for the close association of epithelial tumors and melanoma have been proposed, including field cancerization, tumor collision, tumor-tumor metastases, tumor colonization, and others, though CCTs likely arise through combinations of these processes depending upon their subtype.^37-39 Paracrine signaling may play an important role in the pathogenesis of both tumors.^5,6,8,38 As with MMCs, the prognosis of CCTs is limited by relatively few reported cases. Despite advanced Breslow depths in many cases, these tumors display more indolent behavior suggestive of melanoma in situ rather than invasive melanoma, perhaps due to dependence upon epithelial paracrine factors.^37,39-42

Solid-organ transplant recipients have higher rates of more aggressive malignancies, of which skin cancer is the most common.^43-49 Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin accounts for 95% of cutaneous malignancies in this population and occurs at approximately 65 times the rate of the general population.⁵⁰ The risk of other skin cancers also is increased, though less dramatically, including BCC (10-fold increased risk) and melanoma (2- to 8-fold increased risk).^46,50-53 The cause likely is multifactorial, including older age, history of skin cancer pretransplant, more than 5 years posttransplant, male sex, and incrementally as Fitzpatrick skin type decreases from VI to I.^54-56 Immunosuppressive therapy also plays a role in tumorigenesis. Azathioprine metabolites have specifically been implicated in UVA radiation–induced promutagenic oxidative damage to DNA.⁵⁷ Other studies have found no significant differences in the type of immunosuppressant used but instead have correlated rates of skin cancer to overall immunosuppression.^48,55,58 Lung transplant recipients in particular demonstrate high rates of cutaneous malignancy, likely due in part to the necessity of more potent immunosuppressive regimens. Nearly one-third of patients develop a cutaneous malignancy by 5 years and nearly half by 10 years posttransplant.⁵⁵

We report a rare case of MMC in a solid-organ transplant recipient. We hypothesize that the combination of UV radiation exposure–induced photodamage acquired pretransplant in addition to an aggressive immunosuppressive regimen with azathioprine and other agents posttransplant contributed to the development of this patient’s rare malignancy. Although rare, these tumors should remain in the differential diagnosis of clinicians and pathologists caring for this unique patient population.

To the Editor:

A 68-year-old white man presented with a firm, gradually enlarging, mildly tender, grayish black papule with central ulceration on the left dorsal wrist of 4 months’ duration (Figure 1). His relevant medical history included multiple basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and squamous cell carcinomas, as well as a single-lung transplant 2 years prior, for which he was on chronic immunosuppressive therapy with azathioprine, everolimus, tacrolimus, and prednisone. The clinical differential diagnosis included pigmented BCC, malignant melanoma, and ulcerated squamous cell carcinoma.

Histologic examination of the lesion (Figure 2) demonstrated irregular nodules of basaloid tumor cells with rounded nuclei, visible nucleoli, and scant cytoplasm involving the dermis. The tumor produced abrupt matrical-type keratinization, forming ghost cells. The lesion also contained frequent mitotic figures, apoptotic cells, focal areas of necrosis, and abundant melanin pigment. Admixed throughout the lesion were pigmented and dendritic melanocytic cells. The overlying epidermis was focally ulcerated with an adjacent localized connection between the tumor and the epidermis. Keratinocyte atypia was found in the surrounding epidermis, which contained melanophages, solar elastosis, and scattered chronic inflammatory cells. An immunohistochemical study (Figure 3) for tyrosinase demonstrated abundant admixed melanocytic cells. β-Catenin expression was shown in both nuclear and cytoplasmic distributions, and there was focal labeling on BerEP4 staining. Based on these findings, a diagnosis of melanocytic matrical carcinoma (MMC) was made.

Melanocytic matricoma (MM), a rare adnexal tumor, was first described in 1999 by Carlson et al.¹ A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms melanocytic and matricoma yielded 24 reported cases in the English-language literature.^1-17 It consists of an admixed population of basaloid matrical and supramatrical cells, ghost cells, and dendritic melanocytes in a well-circumscribed dermal nodule, typically without epidermal or adnexal connection. In comparison to the more commonly described pilomatricoma, which can be uncommonly pigmented, MM typically has only focal areas of ghost cells and lacks cystic architecture.^1,9,10,18 A granulomatous reaction to keratinaceous debris is variably present.^1,9,10 Histologically, the scattered dendritic melanocytes are classically benign, but cases demonstrating melanocyte atypia have been reported.^10,13 Melanocytic matricoma appears most commonly as a black or gray papule on sun-damaged skin in older men and tends not to recur following complete excision; thus, MM is considered to be a clinically benign neoplasm. Given the demographics and distribution of the lesions, exposure to UV radiation is thought to play a contributory role in the pathogenesis.^2,10,19 Melanocytic matricoma is believed to recapitulate the hair follicle in the anagen phase, where there is close interplay between matrical keratinocytes and melanocytes prior to cessation of melanogenesis during the catagen phase.^5,6,8,20,21 Evidence demonstrating highly conserved β-catenin and downstream lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF1) expression, as well as pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 1 (PHLDA1) expression (as a marker for follicular stem cells), points to constitutive activity in the Wnt signaling pathway in follicular stem cells of the bulge area as a major agent of tumorigenesis.¹²

Melanocytic matrical carcinoma, also known as malignant MM or matrical carcinoma with melanocytic hyperplasia, may be considered the malignant counterpart to MM.²² A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms melanocytic matrical carcinoma, malignant melanocytic matricoma, and matrical carcinoma with melanocytic hyperplasia, with review of references to identify additional citations, yielded 13 reported cases of MMC in the English-language literature (Table).^19,22-30 As with MM, MMC is a biphasic tumor with basaloid matrical and supramatrical cells; focal areas of ghost cells; and admixed, banal-appearing dendritic melanocytes. However, the basaloid component also demonstrates nuclear atypia, mitoses, occasional ulceration, and variably poor circumscription. Clinically these lesions can mimic pigmented BCC, malignant melanoma, or other malignant adnexal tumors.²⁵ Their natural history is unknown due to few reported cases, but they can be correlated with matrical carcinomas, which were first described by Weedon et al³¹ in 1980. A summary of more than 130 cases of matrical carcinomas in the English-language literature found that MMCs have high rates of local recurrence and metastasize in approximately 13% of cases. Wide local excision demonstrated lower rates of recurrence than simple excision (23% vs 83%), but there were insufficient cases to determine the incidence following Mohs micrographic surgery.³² Melanocytic matrical carcinomas also demonstrate mutations in the β-catenin pathway,pointing to a similar pathogenesis as their benign counterparts or perhaps direct malignant transformation.^25,33,34

A subset of MMCs are combined cutaneous tumors (CCTs) consisting of epithelial neoplasms in close association with malignant melanocytes. Two of the more common variants include dermal squamomelanocytic tumors, a term first used by Pool et al,³⁵ and malignant basomelanocytic tumors, as named by Erickson et al,³⁶ but trichoblastomelanomas and other types have been documented.³⁷ Although CCTs typically occur in the same patient populations as MMCs, namely elderly white men with chronically sun-damaged skin,they exhibit several important distinctions.^37-39 By definition, CCTs have a malignant melanocytic component, whereas melanocytes are nonneoplastic in MMCs. The pathogenesis may differ as well. Various mechanisms for the close association of epithelial tumors and melanoma have been proposed, including field cancerization, tumor collision, tumor-tumor metastases, tumor colonization, and others, though CCTs likely arise through combinations of these processes depending upon their subtype.^37-39 Paracrine signaling may play an important role in the pathogenesis of both tumors.^5,6,8,38 As with MMCs, the prognosis of CCTs is limited by relatively few reported cases. Despite advanced Breslow depths in many cases, these tumors display more indolent behavior suggestive of melanoma in situ rather than invasive melanoma, perhaps due to dependence upon epithelial paracrine factors.^37,39-42

Solid-organ transplant recipients have higher rates of more aggressive malignancies, of which skin cancer is the most common.^43-49 Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin accounts for 95% of cutaneous malignancies in this population and occurs at approximately 65 times the rate of the general population.⁵⁰ The risk of other skin cancers also is increased, though less dramatically, including BCC (10-fold increased risk) and melanoma (2- to 8-fold increased risk).^46,50-53 The cause likely is multifactorial, including older age, history of skin cancer pretransplant, more than 5 years posttransplant, male sex, and incrementally as Fitzpatrick skin type decreases from VI to I.^54-56 Immunosuppressive therapy also plays a role in tumorigenesis. Azathioprine metabolites have specifically been implicated in UVA radiation–induced promutagenic oxidative damage to DNA.⁵⁷ Other studies have found no significant differences in the type of immunosuppressant used but instead have correlated rates of skin cancer to overall immunosuppression.^48,55,58 Lung transplant recipients in particular demonstrate high rates of cutaneous malignancy, likely due in part to the necessity of more potent immunosuppressive regimens. Nearly one-third of patients develop a cutaneous malignancy by 5 years and nearly half by 10 years posttransplant.⁵⁵

We report a rare case of MMC in a solid-organ transplant recipient. We hypothesize that the combination of UV radiation exposure–induced photodamage acquired pretransplant in addition to an aggressive immunosuppressive regimen with azathioprine and other agents posttransplant contributed to the development of this patient’s rare malignancy. Although rare, these tumors should remain in the differential diagnosis of clinicians and pathologists caring for this unique patient population.

To the Editor:

A 68-year-old white man presented with a firm, gradually enlarging, mildly tender, grayish black papule with central ulceration on the left dorsal wrist of 4 months’ duration (Figure 1). His relevant medical history included multiple basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and squamous cell carcinomas, as well as a single-lung transplant 2 years prior, for which he was on chronic immunosuppressive therapy with azathioprine, everolimus, tacrolimus, and prednisone. The clinical differential diagnosis included pigmented BCC, malignant melanoma, and ulcerated squamous cell carcinoma.

Histologic examination of the lesion (Figure 2) demonstrated irregular nodules of basaloid tumor cells with rounded nuclei, visible nucleoli, and scant cytoplasm involving the dermis. The tumor produced abrupt matrical-type keratinization, forming ghost cells. The lesion also contained frequent mitotic figures, apoptotic cells, focal areas of necrosis, and abundant melanin pigment. Admixed throughout the lesion were pigmented and dendritic melanocytic cells. The overlying epidermis was focally ulcerated with an adjacent localized connection between the tumor and the epidermis. Keratinocyte atypia was found in the surrounding epidermis, which contained melanophages, solar elastosis, and scattered chronic inflammatory cells. An immunohistochemical study (Figure 3) for tyrosinase demonstrated abundant admixed melanocytic cells. β-Catenin expression was shown in both nuclear and cytoplasmic distributions, and there was focal labeling on BerEP4 staining. Based on these findings, a diagnosis of melanocytic matrical carcinoma (MMC) was made.

Melanocytic matricoma (MM), a rare adnexal tumor, was first described in 1999 by Carlson et al.¹ A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms melanocytic and matricoma yielded 24 reported cases in the English-language literature.^1-17 It consists of an admixed population of basaloid matrical and supramatrical cells, ghost cells, and dendritic melanocytes in a well-circumscribed dermal nodule, typically without epidermal or adnexal connection. In comparison to the more commonly described pilomatricoma, which can be uncommonly pigmented, MM typically has only focal areas of ghost cells and lacks cystic architecture.^1,9,10,18 A granulomatous reaction to keratinaceous debris is variably present.^1,9,10 Histologically, the scattered dendritic melanocytes are classically benign, but cases demonstrating melanocyte atypia have been reported.^10,13 Melanocytic matricoma appears most commonly as a black or gray papule on sun-damaged skin in older men and tends not to recur following complete excision; thus, MM is considered to be a clinically benign neoplasm. Given the demographics and distribution of the lesions, exposure to UV radiation is thought to play a contributory role in the pathogenesis.^2,10,19 Melanocytic matricoma is believed to recapitulate the hair follicle in the anagen phase, where there is close interplay between matrical keratinocytes and melanocytes prior to cessation of melanogenesis during the catagen phase.^5,6,8,20,21 Evidence demonstrating highly conserved β-catenin and downstream lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF1) expression, as well as pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 1 (PHLDA1) expression (as a marker for follicular stem cells), points to constitutive activity in the Wnt signaling pathway in follicular stem cells of the bulge area as a major agent of tumorigenesis.¹²

Melanocytic matrical carcinoma, also known as malignant MM or matrical carcinoma with melanocytic hyperplasia, may be considered the malignant counterpart to MM.²² A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms melanocytic matrical carcinoma, malignant melanocytic matricoma, and matrical carcinoma with melanocytic hyperplasia, with review of references to identify additional citations, yielded 13 reported cases of MMC in the English-language literature (Table).^19,22-30 As with MM, MMC is a biphasic tumor with basaloid matrical and supramatrical cells; focal areas of ghost cells; and admixed, banal-appearing dendritic melanocytes. However, the basaloid component also demonstrates nuclear atypia, mitoses, occasional ulceration, and variably poor circumscription. Clinically these lesions can mimic pigmented BCC, malignant melanoma, or other malignant adnexal tumors.²⁵ Their natural history is unknown due to few reported cases, but they can be correlated with matrical carcinomas, which were first described by Weedon et al³¹ in 1980. A summary of more than 130 cases of matrical carcinomas in the English-language literature found that MMCs have high rates of local recurrence and metastasize in approximately 13% of cases. Wide local excision demonstrated lower rates of recurrence than simple excision (23% vs 83%), but there were insufficient cases to determine the incidence following Mohs micrographic surgery.³² Melanocytic matrical carcinomas also demonstrate mutations in the β-catenin pathway,pointing to a similar pathogenesis as their benign counterparts or perhaps direct malignant transformation.^25,33,34

A subset of MMCs are combined cutaneous tumors (CCTs) consisting of epithelial neoplasms in close association with malignant melanocytes. Two of the more common variants include dermal squamomelanocytic tumors, a term first used by Pool et al,³⁵ and malignant basomelanocytic tumors, as named by Erickson et al,³⁶ but trichoblastomelanomas and other types have been documented.³⁷ Although CCTs typically occur in the same patient populations as MMCs, namely elderly white men with chronically sun-damaged skin,they exhibit several important distinctions.^37-39 By definition, CCTs have a malignant melanocytic component, whereas melanocytes are nonneoplastic in MMCs. The pathogenesis may differ as well. Various mechanisms for the close association of epithelial tumors and melanoma have been proposed, including field cancerization, tumor collision, tumor-tumor metastases, tumor colonization, and others, though CCTs likely arise through combinations of these processes depending upon their subtype.^37-39 Paracrine signaling may play an important role in the pathogenesis of both tumors.^5,6,8,38 As with MMCs, the prognosis of CCTs is limited by relatively few reported cases. Despite advanced Breslow depths in many cases, these tumors display more indolent behavior suggestive of melanoma in situ rather than invasive melanoma, perhaps due to dependence upon epithelial paracrine factors.^37,39-42

Solid-organ transplant recipients have higher rates of more aggressive malignancies, of which skin cancer is the most common.^43-49 Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin accounts for 95% of cutaneous malignancies in this population and occurs at approximately 65 times the rate of the general population.⁵⁰ The risk of other skin cancers also is increased, though less dramatically, including BCC (10-fold increased risk) and melanoma (2- to 8-fold increased risk).^46,50-53 The cause likely is multifactorial, including older age, history of skin cancer pretransplant, more than 5 years posttransplant, male sex, and incrementally as Fitzpatrick skin type decreases from VI to I.^54-56 Immunosuppressive therapy also plays a role in tumorigenesis. Azathioprine metabolites have specifically been implicated in UVA radiation–induced promutagenic oxidative damage to DNA.⁵⁷ Other studies have found no significant differences in the type of immunosuppressant used but instead have correlated rates of skin cancer to overall immunosuppression.^48,55,58 Lung transplant recipients in particular demonstrate high rates of cutaneous malignancy, likely due in part to the necessity of more potent immunosuppressive regimens. Nearly one-third of patients develop a cutaneous malignancy by 5 years and nearly half by 10 years posttransplant.⁵⁵

We report a rare case of MMC in a solid-organ transplant recipient. We hypothesize that the combination of UV radiation exposure–induced photodamage acquired pretransplant in addition to an aggressive immunosuppressive regimen with azathioprine and other agents posttransplant contributed to the development of this patient’s rare malignancy. Although rare, these tumors should remain in the differential diagnosis of clinicians and pathologists caring for this unique patient population.

Vandetanib is a once-daily oral multikinase inhibitor that targets the rearranged during transfection (RET) tyrosine kinase, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, and epidermal growth factor receptor. It has shown efficacy at doses of 300 mg daily in the treatment of progressive medullary thyroid cancer and has shown promise in non–small cell lung cancer and breast cancer. Vandetanib’s toxicity profile includes QT prolongation, diarrhea, and rash.^1-3 Cutaneous involvement has been described in the literature as a photodistributed drug reaction with both erythema multiforme (EM) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)–like eruptions, phototoxicity, and photoallergy (Table).^4-12 Photoinduction is the common thread, but various mechanisms have been proposed, including drug deposition within the dermis and direct toxicity to keratinocytes; however, an understanding of the varied presentation is lacking.

We present 3 cases of vandetanib photoinduced cutaneous toxicities and review the literature on this novel kinase inhibitor. This discussion highlights the spectrum of photosensitivity reactions to vandetanib among patients with varying histologic and clinical presentations.

Case Reports

Patient 1A
74-year-old woman with a history of recurrent metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and Fitzpatrick skin type III presented with erythematous, well-demarcated, photodistributed, eczematous papules that were coalescing into plaques on the scalp, hands, and face. The rash appeared sharply demarcated at the wrists bilaterally and principally involved the dorsal sun-exposed areas of her hands (Figure 1). The rash also involved the face and the V of the neck with sharp demarcation. Two weeks prior to onset, she initiated a phase 1 trial of oral vandetanib 100 mg twice daily and oral everolimus 5 mg daily. She did not recall practicing sun protection or experiencing increased sun exposure after starting that trial. The patient demonstrated symptom improvement with desonide cream, hydrocortisone cream 2.5%, and over-the-counter analgesic cream while continuing with the study drugs. However, she developed new, warm, painful papules on the hands and face. Phototesting and biopsy were not performed, and the etiology of the photosensitivity was unknown.

The patient was counseled about regular sun protection and was prescribed triamcinolone cream 0.1% for the arms and hydrocortisone cream 2.5% for the affected facial areas. Therapy with vandetanib and everolimus was continued without dose reduction or further cutaneous eruptions.

Patient 2
A 54-year-old man with a history of progressive medullary thyroid carcinoma and Fitzpatrick skin type II presented with erythematous, well-demarcated, photodistributed, edematous plaques and bullae of the head and neck, bilateral dorsal hands, and bilateral palms of 2 weeks’ duration. The rash spared the upper back and chest with a well-demarcated border (Figure 2A). There were ulcerations and erosions at the base of the neck and the dorsal hands (Figure 2B). He also had conjunctivitis but uninvolved oral and genital mucosae.

Two weeks before the rash appeared, oral vandetanib 300 mg daily was initiated. The patient initially noted some dry skin, which progressed to an eruption involving the face and neck and later the hands with palmar blistering and desquamation. Medication cessation for 1 month led to moderate improvement of the rash on the face and neck. He had not been practicing sun protection but did wear a baseball cap when outside. The patient did not recall an incidence of increased sun exposure. He underwent a skin biopsy of the right dorsal hand, which revealed interface dermatitis with dyskeratosis and subepidermal and intraepidermal bullae (Figure 3). The biopsy findings were most consistent with a phototoxic eruption. Phototesting was not performed.

Patient 3
A 73-year-old man with a history of metastatic lung carcinoma and Fitzpatrick skin type II presented with a rash on the scalp, face, and arms of 2.5 weeks’ duration. There was sharp demarcation at the edges of sun-exposed skin, and no bullae were noted (Figure 4). Prior to presentation, the patient started a 4-week phase 1 trial with vandetanib 300 mg daily and everolimus 10 mg daily. He did not recall any episodes of increased sun exposure. A punch biopsy of the arm showed an interface dermatitis suggestive of a phototoxic reaction. Phototesting was not performed to further clarify if there was a diminished minimal erythema dose with UVA or UVB radiation. Both drugs were discontinued, strict photoprotection was practiced, and triamcinolone cream 0.1% was initiated with resolution of rash. Vandetanib and everolimus were resumed at initial doses with strict photoprotection, and the rash has not recurred.

Comment

Adverse Events Associated With Vandetanib
Vandetanib is a novel multikinase inhibitor that targets RET tyrosine kinase, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, and epidermal growth factor receptor.^1,2 It currently is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of progressive medullary thyroid cancer and is being used in clinical trials for non–small cell lung cancer, glioma, advanced biliary tract cancer, breast cancer, and other advanced solid malignancies. Frequently reported adverse events (AEs) include QT prolongation, diarrhea, and rash.^1-3 In a large phase 3 trial, 45% of patients had a rash; of these, 4% were grade 3 and above.³ The most common reasons for dose decrease or cessation were diarrhea and rash (1% and 1.3%, respectively).¹³ Outside of a trial setting, 75% (45/60) of patients in one French study reported a cutaneous AE, with photosensitivity noted in 22% (13/60). Thus, cutaneous reactions tend to be a common occurrence for patients on this drug, requiring diligent dermatologic examinations.¹⁴ In one meta-analysis comprising 9 studies with a total of 2961 patients, the incidence of all-grade rash was 46.1% (95% CI, 40.6%-51.8%), and it was concluded that vandetanib has the highest association of all-grade rash among the anti–vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In this meta-analysis, the specific diagnosis of AEs was not further classified.¹⁵ In another cohort of vandetanib-treated patients, as many as 37% (28/63) of patients had photosensitivity, with no clarification of the etiology.¹⁶

Photoallergic vs Phototoxic Reactions
Photosensitivity reactions are cutaneous reactions that occur from UV light exposure, typically in conjunction with a photosensitizing agent. Photosensitivity reactions can be further classified into phototoxic and photoallergic reactions, which can be distinguished by histopathologic evaluation and history. Although phototoxic reactions will cause keratinocyte necrosis similar to a sunburn, photoallergic reactions will cause epidermal spongiosis similar to allergic contact dermatitis or eczema. Also, phototoxic reactions appear within 1 to 2 days of UV exposure and often are painful, whereas photoallergic reactions can be delayed for 2 to 3 weeks and usually are pruritic. Photosensitivity reactions related to vandetanib have been reported and are summarized in the Table.^4-12

Although reported cutaneous reactions to vandetanib thus far in the literature were reported as photoinduced reactions, there have been isolated case reports of other eruptions including cutaneous pigmentation⁵ and one case of SJS.⁹ According to a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms vandetanib and rash, we found that there are a variety of clinical findings, but most of the reported photosensitivity cases were phototoxic. Fava et al⁷ and Goldstein et al¹² both reported 1 photoallergic reaction each, plus patient 1 in our case series was noted to have a photoallergic reaction. Phototoxic reactions were reported in 4 patients (including our patient 2) who had dyskeratotic keratinocytes and vacuolar degeneration of the basal layer on histopathology.^4,8 Fava et al⁷ described a lichenoid infiltrate with spongiosis consistent with a photoallergic reaction, but Chang et al⁴ and Bota et al¹¹ described a lichenoid infiltrate with dyskeratotic cells. Also, Giacchero et al¹⁶ described a photosensitivity reaction in 28 of 63 patients. Although only 6 patients had biopsies performed, the range of photosensitivity reactions was demonstrated with lichenoid, dyskeratotic, and spongiotic reactions. However, the cases were not further defined as photoallergic or phototoxic.¹⁶ Vandetanib also has been associated with cutaneous blue pigmentation after likely phototoxic reactions. Pigment changes occurred after photosensitivity, but the clinical presentation of photosensitivity was not further characterized.^5,16

Classic Drug Eruptions
Two patients were described as having classic drug eruptions—EM¹⁰ and SJS⁹—in photodistributed locations. Histologically, these entities are identical to phototoxic reactions, resulting in epidermal necrosis and an interface dermatitis, but the presence of targetoid lesions on the palms prompted the diagnosis of photodistributed EM and SJS in both cases.^9,10 Unique to the SJS case was oral involvement.⁹

Distinguishing between a phototoxic reaction and photodistributed EM or SJS may be inconsequential if both can be prevented with photoprotection. Rechallenging patients with vandetanib while practicing photoprotection would help to clarify the mechanism, though this course is not always practical.

Mechanism of Action
As seen in our case series, cutaneous reactions occurred only on sun-exposed surfaces, and patients presented with sharp cutoff points that spared non–sun-exposed areas. Although clinically organized as a subtype of photosensitivity, the phototoxicity mechanism of action is considered a direct toxic effect on keratinocytes, which explains the histopathologic finding of dyskeratotic cells and the clinical spectrum of sunburn reaction, phototoxic EM, and SJS. UVA1 induces 2 photoproducts of vandetanib via a UVA1-mediated debromination process,¹⁷ but these photoproducts are not responsible for epidermal dyskeratosis.¹⁸ It was subsequently demonstrated that keratinocyte death was induced by apoptosis through photoinduced DNA cleavage and the formation of an aryl radical, which can induce further DNA damage.¹⁸ Caro-Gutierrez et al¹⁰ demonstrated a lowered minimal erythema dose in their patient with vandetanib-induced phototoxic EM.

Conversely, photoallergic reactions are considered immune-mediated delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions.^4,7,11 Although the mechanism of a photoallergic reaction remains unclear, it is possible that vandetanib or a metabolite (in susceptible patients) induces an immune-mediated delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction with repeated exposure to the compound, which may explain the varied timing of photoallergic onset, including the events featured in the Bota et al¹¹ case that occurred several months after drug initiation.

Conclusion

Considering the high prevalence of cutaneous AEs, especially varied photosensitivity reactions, these cases emphasize the importance of sun protection to help prevent dose reduction or drug cessation among patients taking vandetanib therapy.

Vandetanib is a once-daily oral multikinase inhibitor that targets the rearranged during transfection (RET) tyrosine kinase, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, and epidermal growth factor receptor. It has shown efficacy at doses of 300 mg daily in the treatment of progressive medullary thyroid cancer and has shown promise in non–small cell lung cancer and breast cancer. Vandetanib’s toxicity profile includes QT prolongation, diarrhea, and rash.^1-3 Cutaneous involvement has been described in the literature as a photodistributed drug reaction with both erythema multiforme (EM) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)–like eruptions, phototoxicity, and photoallergy (Table).^4-12 Photoinduction is the common thread, but various mechanisms have been proposed, including drug deposition within the dermis and direct toxicity to keratinocytes; however, an understanding of the varied presentation is lacking.

We present 3 cases of vandetanib photoinduced cutaneous toxicities and review the literature on this novel kinase inhibitor. This discussion highlights the spectrum of photosensitivity reactions to vandetanib among patients with varying histologic and clinical presentations.

Case Reports

Patient 1A
74-year-old woman with a history of recurrent metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and Fitzpatrick skin type III presented with erythematous, well-demarcated, photodistributed, eczematous papules that were coalescing into plaques on the scalp, hands, and face. The rash appeared sharply demarcated at the wrists bilaterally and principally involved the dorsal sun-exposed areas of her hands (Figure 1). The rash also involved the face and the V of the neck with sharp demarcation. Two weeks prior to onset, she initiated a phase 1 trial of oral vandetanib 100 mg twice daily and oral everolimus 5 mg daily. She did not recall practicing sun protection or experiencing increased sun exposure after starting that trial. The patient demonstrated symptom improvement with desonide cream, hydrocortisone cream 2.5%, and over-the-counter analgesic cream while continuing with the study drugs. However, she developed new, warm, painful papules on the hands and face. Phototesting and biopsy were not performed, and the etiology of the photosensitivity was unknown.

The patient was counseled about regular sun protection and was prescribed triamcinolone cream 0.1% for the arms and hydrocortisone cream 2.5% for the affected facial areas. Therapy with vandetanib and everolimus was continued without dose reduction or further cutaneous eruptions.

Patient 2
A 54-year-old man with a history of progressive medullary thyroid carcinoma and Fitzpatrick skin type II presented with erythematous, well-demarcated, photodistributed, edematous plaques and bullae of the head and neck, bilateral dorsal hands, and bilateral palms of 2 weeks’ duration. The rash spared the upper back and chest with a well-demarcated border (Figure 2A). There were ulcerations and erosions at the base of the neck and the dorsal hands (Figure 2B). He also had conjunctivitis but uninvolved oral and genital mucosae.

Two weeks before the rash appeared, oral vandetanib 300 mg daily was initiated. The patient initially noted some dry skin, which progressed to an eruption involving the face and neck and later the hands with palmar blistering and desquamation. Medication cessation for 1 month led to moderate improvement of the rash on the face and neck. He had not been practicing sun protection but did wear a baseball cap when outside. The patient did not recall an incidence of increased sun exposure. He underwent a skin biopsy of the right dorsal hand, which revealed interface dermatitis with dyskeratosis and subepidermal and intraepidermal bullae (Figure 3). The biopsy findings were most consistent with a phototoxic eruption. Phototesting was not performed.

Patient 3
A 73-year-old man with a history of metastatic lung carcinoma and Fitzpatrick skin type II presented with a rash on the scalp, face, and arms of 2.5 weeks’ duration. There was sharp demarcation at the edges of sun-exposed skin, and no bullae were noted (Figure 4). Prior to presentation, the patient started a 4-week phase 1 trial with vandetanib 300 mg daily and everolimus 10 mg daily. He did not recall any episodes of increased sun exposure. A punch biopsy of the arm showed an interface dermatitis suggestive of a phototoxic reaction. Phototesting was not performed to further clarify if there was a diminished minimal erythema dose with UVA or UVB radiation. Both drugs were discontinued, strict photoprotection was practiced, and triamcinolone cream 0.1% was initiated with resolution of rash. Vandetanib and everolimus were resumed at initial doses with strict photoprotection, and the rash has not recurred.

Comment

Adverse Events Associated With Vandetanib
Vandetanib is a novel multikinase inhibitor that targets RET tyrosine kinase, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, and epidermal growth factor receptor.^1,2 It currently is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of progressive medullary thyroid cancer and is being used in clinical trials for non–small cell lung cancer, glioma, advanced biliary tract cancer, breast cancer, and other advanced solid malignancies. Frequently reported adverse events (AEs) include QT prolongation, diarrhea, and rash.^1-3 In a large phase 3 trial, 45% of patients had a rash; of these, 4% were grade 3 and above.³ The most common reasons for dose decrease or cessation were diarrhea and rash (1% and 1.3%, respectively).¹³ Outside of a trial setting, 75% (45/60) of patients in one French study reported a cutaneous AE, with photosensitivity noted in 22% (13/60). Thus, cutaneous reactions tend to be a common occurrence for patients on this drug, requiring diligent dermatologic examinations.¹⁴ In one meta-analysis comprising 9 studies with a total of 2961 patients, the incidence of all-grade rash was 46.1% (95% CI, 40.6%-51.8%), and it was concluded that vandetanib has the highest association of all-grade rash among the anti–vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In this meta-analysis, the specific diagnosis of AEs was not further classified.¹⁵ In another cohort of vandetanib-treated patients, as many as 37% (28/63) of patients had photosensitivity, with no clarification of the etiology.¹⁶

Photoallergic vs Phototoxic Reactions
Photosensitivity reactions are cutaneous reactions that occur from UV light exposure, typically in conjunction with a photosensitizing agent. Photosensitivity reactions can be further classified into phototoxic and photoallergic reactions, which can be distinguished by histopathologic evaluation and history. Although phototoxic reactions will cause keratinocyte necrosis similar to a sunburn, photoallergic reactions will cause epidermal spongiosis similar to allergic contact dermatitis or eczema. Also, phototoxic reactions appear within 1 to 2 days of UV exposure and often are painful, whereas photoallergic reactions can be delayed for 2 to 3 weeks and usually are pruritic. Photosensitivity reactions related to vandetanib have been reported and are summarized in the Table.^4-12

Although reported cutaneous reactions to vandetanib thus far in the literature were reported as photoinduced reactions, there have been isolated case reports of other eruptions including cutaneous pigmentation⁵ and one case of SJS.⁹ According to a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms vandetanib and rash, we found that there are a variety of clinical findings, but most of the reported photosensitivity cases were phototoxic. Fava et al⁷ and Goldstein et al¹² both reported 1 photoallergic reaction each, plus patient 1 in our case series was noted to have a photoallergic reaction. Phototoxic reactions were reported in 4 patients (including our patient 2) who had dyskeratotic keratinocytes and vacuolar degeneration of the basal layer on histopathology.^4,8 Fava et al⁷ described a lichenoid infiltrate with spongiosis consistent with a photoallergic reaction, but Chang et al⁴ and Bota et al¹¹ described a lichenoid infiltrate with dyskeratotic cells. Also, Giacchero et al¹⁶ described a photosensitivity reaction in 28 of 63 patients. Although only 6 patients had biopsies performed, the range of photosensitivity reactions was demonstrated with lichenoid, dyskeratotic, and spongiotic reactions. However, the cases were not further defined as photoallergic or phototoxic.¹⁶ Vandetanib also has been associated with cutaneous blue pigmentation after likely phototoxic reactions. Pigment changes occurred after photosensitivity, but the clinical presentation of photosensitivity was not further characterized.^5,16

Classic Drug Eruptions
Two patients were described as having classic drug eruptions—EM¹⁰ and SJS⁹—in photodistributed locations. Histologically, these entities are identical to phototoxic reactions, resulting in epidermal necrosis and an interface dermatitis, but the presence of targetoid lesions on the palms prompted the diagnosis of photodistributed EM and SJS in both cases.^9,10 Unique to the SJS case was oral involvement.⁹

Distinguishing between a phototoxic reaction and photodistributed EM or SJS may be inconsequential if both can be prevented with photoprotection. Rechallenging patients with vandetanib while practicing photoprotection would help to clarify the mechanism, though this course is not always practical.

Mechanism of Action
As seen in our case series, cutaneous reactions occurred only on sun-exposed surfaces, and patients presented with sharp cutoff points that spared non–sun-exposed areas. Although clinically organized as a subtype of photosensitivity, the phototoxicity mechanism of action is considered a direct toxic effect on keratinocytes, which explains the histopathologic finding of dyskeratotic cells and the clinical spectrum of sunburn reaction, phototoxic EM, and SJS. UVA1 induces 2 photoproducts of vandetanib via a UVA1-mediated debromination process,¹⁷ but these photoproducts are not responsible for epidermal dyskeratosis.¹⁸ It was subsequently demonstrated that keratinocyte death was induced by apoptosis through photoinduced DNA cleavage and the formation of an aryl radical, which can induce further DNA damage.¹⁸ Caro-Gutierrez et al¹⁰ demonstrated a lowered minimal erythema dose in their patient with vandetanib-induced phototoxic EM.

Conversely, photoallergic reactions are considered immune-mediated delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions.^4,7,11 Although the mechanism of a photoallergic reaction remains unclear, it is possible that vandetanib or a metabolite (in susceptible patients) induces an immune-mediated delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction with repeated exposure to the compound, which may explain the varied timing of photoallergic onset, including the events featured in the Bota et al¹¹ case that occurred several months after drug initiation.

Conclusion

Considering the high prevalence of cutaneous AEs, especially varied photosensitivity reactions, these cases emphasize the importance of sun protection to help prevent dose reduction or drug cessation among patients taking vandetanib therapy.

Vandetanib is a once-daily oral multikinase inhibitor that targets the rearranged during transfection (RET) tyrosine kinase, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, and epidermal growth factor receptor. It has shown efficacy at doses of 300 mg daily in the treatment of progressive medullary thyroid cancer and has shown promise in non–small cell lung cancer and breast cancer. Vandetanib’s toxicity profile includes QT prolongation, diarrhea, and rash.^1-3 Cutaneous involvement has been described in the literature as a photodistributed drug reaction with both erythema multiforme (EM) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)–like eruptions, phototoxicity, and photoallergy (Table).^4-12 Photoinduction is the common thread, but various mechanisms have been proposed, including drug deposition within the dermis and direct toxicity to keratinocytes; however, an understanding of the varied presentation is lacking.

We present 3 cases of vandetanib photoinduced cutaneous toxicities and review the literature on this novel kinase inhibitor. This discussion highlights the spectrum of photosensitivity reactions to vandetanib among patients with varying histologic and clinical presentations.

Case Reports

Patient 1A
74-year-old woman with a history of recurrent metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and Fitzpatrick skin type III presented with erythematous, well-demarcated, photodistributed, eczematous papules that were coalescing into plaques on the scalp, hands, and face. The rash appeared sharply demarcated at the wrists bilaterally and principally involved the dorsal sun-exposed areas of her hands (Figure 1). The rash also involved the face and the V of the neck with sharp demarcation. Two weeks prior to onset, she initiated a phase 1 trial of oral vandetanib 100 mg twice daily and oral everolimus 5 mg daily. She did not recall practicing sun protection or experiencing increased sun exposure after starting that trial. The patient demonstrated symptom improvement with desonide cream, hydrocortisone cream 2.5%, and over-the-counter analgesic cream while continuing with the study drugs. However, she developed new, warm, painful papules on the hands and face. Phototesting and biopsy were not performed, and the etiology of the photosensitivity was unknown.

The patient was counseled about regular sun protection and was prescribed triamcinolone cream 0.1% for the arms and hydrocortisone cream 2.5% for the affected facial areas. Therapy with vandetanib and everolimus was continued without dose reduction or further cutaneous eruptions.

Patient 2
A 54-year-old man with a history of progressive medullary thyroid carcinoma and Fitzpatrick skin type II presented with erythematous, well-demarcated, photodistributed, edematous plaques and bullae of the head and neck, bilateral dorsal hands, and bilateral palms of 2 weeks’ duration. The rash spared the upper back and chest with a well-demarcated border (Figure 2A). There were ulcerations and erosions at the base of the neck and the dorsal hands (Figure 2B). He also had conjunctivitis but uninvolved oral and genital mucosae.

Two weeks before the rash appeared, oral vandetanib 300 mg daily was initiated. The patient initially noted some dry skin, which progressed to an eruption involving the face and neck and later the hands with palmar blistering and desquamation. Medication cessation for 1 month led to moderate improvement of the rash on the face and neck. He had not been practicing sun protection but did wear a baseball cap when outside. The patient did not recall an incidence of increased sun exposure. He underwent a skin biopsy of the right dorsal hand, which revealed interface dermatitis with dyskeratosis and subepidermal and intraepidermal bullae (Figure 3). The biopsy findings were most consistent with a phototoxic eruption. Phototesting was not performed.

Patient 3
A 73-year-old man with a history of metastatic lung carcinoma and Fitzpatrick skin type II presented with a rash on the scalp, face, and arms of 2.5 weeks’ duration. There was sharp demarcation at the edges of sun-exposed skin, and no bullae were noted (Figure 4). Prior to presentation, the patient started a 4-week phase 1 trial with vandetanib 300 mg daily and everolimus 10 mg daily. He did not recall any episodes of increased sun exposure. A punch biopsy of the arm showed an interface dermatitis suggestive of a phototoxic reaction. Phototesting was not performed to further clarify if there was a diminished minimal erythema dose with UVA or UVB radiation. Both drugs were discontinued, strict photoprotection was practiced, and triamcinolone cream 0.1% was initiated with resolution of rash. Vandetanib and everolimus were resumed at initial doses with strict photoprotection, and the rash has not recurred.

Comment

Adverse Events Associated With Vandetanib
Vandetanib is a novel multikinase inhibitor that targets RET tyrosine kinase, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, and epidermal growth factor receptor.^1,2 It currently is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of progressive medullary thyroid cancer and is being used in clinical trials for non–small cell lung cancer, glioma, advanced biliary tract cancer, breast cancer, and other advanced solid malignancies. Frequently reported adverse events (AEs) include QT prolongation, diarrhea, and rash.^1-3 In a large phase 3 trial, 45% of patients had a rash; of these, 4% were grade 3 and above.³ The most common reasons for dose decrease or cessation were diarrhea and rash (1% and 1.3%, respectively).¹³ Outside of a trial setting, 75% (45/60) of patients in one French study reported a cutaneous AE, with photosensitivity noted in 22% (13/60). Thus, cutaneous reactions tend to be a common occurrence for patients on this drug, requiring diligent dermatologic examinations.¹⁴ In one meta-analysis comprising 9 studies with a total of 2961 patients, the incidence of all-grade rash was 46.1% (95% CI, 40.6%-51.8%), and it was concluded that vandetanib has the highest association of all-grade rash among the anti–vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In this meta-analysis, the specific diagnosis of AEs was not further classified.¹⁵ In another cohort of vandetanib-treated patients, as many as 37% (28/63) of patients had photosensitivity, with no clarification of the etiology.¹⁶

Photoallergic vs Phototoxic Reactions
Photosensitivity reactions are cutaneous reactions that occur from UV light exposure, typically in conjunction with a photosensitizing agent. Photosensitivity reactions can be further classified into phototoxic and photoallergic reactions, which can be distinguished by histopathologic evaluation and history. Although phototoxic reactions will cause keratinocyte necrosis similar to a sunburn, photoallergic reactions will cause epidermal spongiosis similar to allergic contact dermatitis or eczema. Also, phototoxic reactions appear within 1 to 2 days of UV exposure and often are painful, whereas photoallergic reactions can be delayed for 2 to 3 weeks and usually are pruritic. Photosensitivity reactions related to vandetanib have been reported and are summarized in the Table.^4-12

Although reported cutaneous reactions to vandetanib thus far in the literature were reported as photoinduced reactions, there have been isolated case reports of other eruptions including cutaneous pigmentation⁵ and one case of SJS.⁹ According to a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms vandetanib and rash, we found that there are a variety of clinical findings, but most of the reported photosensitivity cases were phototoxic. Fava et al⁷ and Goldstein et al¹² both reported 1 photoallergic reaction each, plus patient 1 in our case series was noted to have a photoallergic reaction. Phototoxic reactions were reported in 4 patients (including our patient 2) who had dyskeratotic keratinocytes and vacuolar degeneration of the basal layer on histopathology.^4,8 Fava et al⁷ described a lichenoid infiltrate with spongiosis consistent with a photoallergic reaction, but Chang et al⁴ and Bota et al¹¹ described a lichenoid infiltrate with dyskeratotic cells. Also, Giacchero et al¹⁶ described a photosensitivity reaction in 28 of 63 patients. Although only 6 patients had biopsies performed, the range of photosensitivity reactions was demonstrated with lichenoid, dyskeratotic, and spongiotic reactions. However, the cases were not further defined as photoallergic or phototoxic.¹⁶ Vandetanib also has been associated with cutaneous blue pigmentation after likely phototoxic reactions. Pigment changes occurred after photosensitivity, but the clinical presentation of photosensitivity was not further characterized.^5,16

Classic Drug Eruptions
Two patients were described as having classic drug eruptions—EM¹⁰ and SJS⁹—in photodistributed locations. Histologically, these entities are identical to phototoxic reactions, resulting in epidermal necrosis and an interface dermatitis, but the presence of targetoid lesions on the palms prompted the diagnosis of photodistributed EM and SJS in both cases.^9,10 Unique to the SJS case was oral involvement.⁹

Distinguishing between a phototoxic reaction and photodistributed EM or SJS may be inconsequential if both can be prevented with photoprotection. Rechallenging patients with vandetanib while practicing photoprotection would help to clarify the mechanism, though this course is not always practical.

Mechanism of Action
As seen in our case series, cutaneous reactions occurred only on sun-exposed surfaces, and patients presented with sharp cutoff points that spared non–sun-exposed areas. Although clinically organized as a subtype of photosensitivity, the phototoxicity mechanism of action is considered a direct toxic effect on keratinocytes, which explains the histopathologic finding of dyskeratotic cells and the clinical spectrum of sunburn reaction, phototoxic EM, and SJS. UVA1 induces 2 photoproducts of vandetanib via a UVA1-mediated debromination process,¹⁷ but these photoproducts are not responsible for epidermal dyskeratosis.¹⁸ It was subsequently demonstrated that keratinocyte death was induced by apoptosis through photoinduced DNA cleavage and the formation of an aryl radical, which can induce further DNA damage.¹⁸ Caro-Gutierrez et al¹⁰ demonstrated a lowered minimal erythema dose in their patient with vandetanib-induced phototoxic EM.

Conversely, photoallergic reactions are considered immune-mediated delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions.^4,7,11 Although the mechanism of a photoallergic reaction remains unclear, it is possible that vandetanib or a metabolite (in susceptible patients) induces an immune-mediated delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction with repeated exposure to the compound, which may explain the varied timing of photoallergic onset, including the events featured in the Bota et al¹¹ case that occurred several months after drug initiation.

Conclusion

Considering the high prevalence of cutaneous AEs, especially varied photosensitivity reactions, these cases emphasize the importance of sun protection to help prevent dose reduction or drug cessation among patients taking vandetanib therapy.