User login
Virus-Specific T-Cell Infusions May Resolve Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy
Two of three patients cleared JC virus from CSF after infusion.
Infusion of allogeneic BK virus-specific T cells may be an effective treatment for patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), according to a report in the October 11 New England Journal of Medicine. The infusion cleared JC virus from the CSF of two patients and reduced viral load in the third, reported lead author Muharrem Muftuoglu, MD, of the Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and colleagues. One of the patients completely recovered and returned to work; this outcome was unprecedented in PML therapy.
“Several approaches for the treatment of PML, including the use of antiviral medications and mirtazapine, have been tested, with poor results,” the investigators said. Although virus-specific T-cell infusion is a novel approach to treating PML, this method has been used for other conditions. “Several groups, including ours, have successfully used viral-specific T cells to treat BK virus infection after stem-cell transplantation,” the investigators said. “Because BK virus and JC virus are genetically similar to one another and share a number of immunogenic proteins with a substantial degree of sequence homology ... we hypothesized that T cells developed against BK virus may also be effective against JC virus infection.”
This hypothesis proved correct. The investigators infused three patients with PML with “cryopreserved, third-party–produced, viral-specific T cells that had been designed for the treatment of patients with BK virus infection after stem-cell transplantation.” Each patient presented with a different condition and PML-precipitating therapy. The first patient was a 32-year-old woman with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia who had received a cord-blood transplantation, the second a 73-year-old woman with JAK2-positive myeloproliferative neoplasia on ruxolitinib therapy, and the third a 35-year-old man with HIV who had received highly active antiretroviral therapy.
T-cell infusions cleared JC virus from the CSF of the woman with leukemia (three infusions) and the man with HIV (four infusions). These patients recovered to different degrees.The woman had full resolution of symptoms, while the man had slurred speech and walked with a cane. Treatment reduced JC viral load in the elderly woman with myeloproliferative neoplasia (two infusions), but she did not clear the virus and died about eight months later.
No adverse events occurred, but two patients developed immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. This outcome was likely caused by the T-cell infusion, since absolute T-cell counts remained steady and white matter enhancement was detected on MRI within four weeks of treatment. Still, the investigators were optimistic about future potential.
“Third-party–produced, ‘off-the-shelf,’ partially HLA-matched, BK virus–specific T cells may serve as therapy for PML,” the investigators concluded. “Further study in a larger group of patients is required to determine the success rate, durability, and longer-term adverse events associated with this treatment.”
The study was funded by the MD Anderson Cancer Center Moon Shots Program and the National Institutes of Health.
—Will Pass
Suggested Reading
Muftuoglu M, Olson A, Marin D, et al. Allogeneic BK specific T cells for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(15):1443-1451.
Two of three patients cleared JC virus from CSF after infusion.
Two of three patients cleared JC virus from CSF after infusion.
Infusion of allogeneic BK virus-specific T cells may be an effective treatment for patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), according to a report in the October 11 New England Journal of Medicine. The infusion cleared JC virus from the CSF of two patients and reduced viral load in the third, reported lead author Muharrem Muftuoglu, MD, of the Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and colleagues. One of the patients completely recovered and returned to work; this outcome was unprecedented in PML therapy.
“Several approaches for the treatment of PML, including the use of antiviral medications and mirtazapine, have been tested, with poor results,” the investigators said. Although virus-specific T-cell infusion is a novel approach to treating PML, this method has been used for other conditions. “Several groups, including ours, have successfully used viral-specific T cells to treat BK virus infection after stem-cell transplantation,” the investigators said. “Because BK virus and JC virus are genetically similar to one another and share a number of immunogenic proteins with a substantial degree of sequence homology ... we hypothesized that T cells developed against BK virus may also be effective against JC virus infection.”
This hypothesis proved correct. The investigators infused three patients with PML with “cryopreserved, third-party–produced, viral-specific T cells that had been designed for the treatment of patients with BK virus infection after stem-cell transplantation.” Each patient presented with a different condition and PML-precipitating therapy. The first patient was a 32-year-old woman with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia who had received a cord-blood transplantation, the second a 73-year-old woman with JAK2-positive myeloproliferative neoplasia on ruxolitinib therapy, and the third a 35-year-old man with HIV who had received highly active antiretroviral therapy.
T-cell infusions cleared JC virus from the CSF of the woman with leukemia (three infusions) and the man with HIV (four infusions). These patients recovered to different degrees.The woman had full resolution of symptoms, while the man had slurred speech and walked with a cane. Treatment reduced JC viral load in the elderly woman with myeloproliferative neoplasia (two infusions), but she did not clear the virus and died about eight months later.
No adverse events occurred, but two patients developed immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. This outcome was likely caused by the T-cell infusion, since absolute T-cell counts remained steady and white matter enhancement was detected on MRI within four weeks of treatment. Still, the investigators were optimistic about future potential.
“Third-party–produced, ‘off-the-shelf,’ partially HLA-matched, BK virus–specific T cells may serve as therapy for PML,” the investigators concluded. “Further study in a larger group of patients is required to determine the success rate, durability, and longer-term adverse events associated with this treatment.”
The study was funded by the MD Anderson Cancer Center Moon Shots Program and the National Institutes of Health.
—Will Pass
Suggested Reading
Muftuoglu M, Olson A, Marin D, et al. Allogeneic BK specific T cells for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(15):1443-1451.
Infusion of allogeneic BK virus-specific T cells may be an effective treatment for patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), according to a report in the October 11 New England Journal of Medicine. The infusion cleared JC virus from the CSF of two patients and reduced viral load in the third, reported lead author Muharrem Muftuoglu, MD, of the Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and colleagues. One of the patients completely recovered and returned to work; this outcome was unprecedented in PML therapy.
“Several approaches for the treatment of PML, including the use of antiviral medications and mirtazapine, have been tested, with poor results,” the investigators said. Although virus-specific T-cell infusion is a novel approach to treating PML, this method has been used for other conditions. “Several groups, including ours, have successfully used viral-specific T cells to treat BK virus infection after stem-cell transplantation,” the investigators said. “Because BK virus and JC virus are genetically similar to one another and share a number of immunogenic proteins with a substantial degree of sequence homology ... we hypothesized that T cells developed against BK virus may also be effective against JC virus infection.”
This hypothesis proved correct. The investigators infused three patients with PML with “cryopreserved, third-party–produced, viral-specific T cells that had been designed for the treatment of patients with BK virus infection after stem-cell transplantation.” Each patient presented with a different condition and PML-precipitating therapy. The first patient was a 32-year-old woman with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia who had received a cord-blood transplantation, the second a 73-year-old woman with JAK2-positive myeloproliferative neoplasia on ruxolitinib therapy, and the third a 35-year-old man with HIV who had received highly active antiretroviral therapy.
T-cell infusions cleared JC virus from the CSF of the woman with leukemia (three infusions) and the man with HIV (four infusions). These patients recovered to different degrees.The woman had full resolution of symptoms, while the man had slurred speech and walked with a cane. Treatment reduced JC viral load in the elderly woman with myeloproliferative neoplasia (two infusions), but she did not clear the virus and died about eight months later.
No adverse events occurred, but two patients developed immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. This outcome was likely caused by the T-cell infusion, since absolute T-cell counts remained steady and white matter enhancement was detected on MRI within four weeks of treatment. Still, the investigators were optimistic about future potential.
“Third-party–produced, ‘off-the-shelf,’ partially HLA-matched, BK virus–specific T cells may serve as therapy for PML,” the investigators concluded. “Further study in a larger group of patients is required to determine the success rate, durability, and longer-term adverse events associated with this treatment.”
The study was funded by the MD Anderson Cancer Center Moon Shots Program and the National Institutes of Health.
—Will Pass
Suggested Reading
Muftuoglu M, Olson A, Marin D, et al. Allogeneic BK specific T cells for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(15):1443-1451.
Panel Provides Recommendations for Managing Cognitive Changes in MS
Baseline screening and periodic reassessments aid in the monitoring of treatment response and disease progression.
The National Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Society has developed recommendations for the identification and management of cognitive impairment in MS. The recommendations, which were endorsed by the Consortium of MS Centers and the International MS Cognition Society, were published online ahead of print October 10 in Multiple Sclerosis Journal.
Cognitive change may affect between 34% and 65% of adults with MS. Decreases in information processing and memory are the most common changes, and cognitive impairment may arise before MRI abnormalities that indicate MS. These changes can affect patients’ ability to work, drive, manage money, and participate in activities.
Patients and Clinicians Need Information
Patients and caregivers should receive information about common cognitive changes in MS and how they affect everyday life, said Rosalind Kalb, PhD, Vice President of the Professional Resource Center at the National MS Society in New York, and coauthors. Patients and caregivers also should be told about the high prevalence of cognitive symptoms in MS and the need for ongoing assessments. Similarly, clinicians need information about how cognitive impairments affect medical decision-making and adherence, said the authors. Clinicians also need referral resources for cognitive assessment and treatment.
All adults and children age 8 or older diagnosed with MS should, as a minimum, undergo early baseline screening with the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) or another validated screening tool, according to the recommendations. These patients should be reassessed with the same instrument annually or more often, as needed, to detect disease activity, assess for treatment effects or relapse recovery, monitor progression of cognitive impairment, and screen for new cognitive problems.
In addition to the SDMT, screening tools that have been validated in patients with MS include the Processing Speed Test, Computerized Speed Cognitive Test, MS Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire, Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS, Brief Repeatable Neuropsychological Battery, and Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS.
Interventions May Improve or Maintain Function
An adult who tests positive for cognitive impairment on initial screening should undergo a more comprehensive assessment, especially if the person has comorbidities that raise concerns or is applying for disability due to cognitive impairment. A child with an unexplained change in school performance should receive a neuropsychologic evaluation, said Dr. Kalb and colleagues.
Furthermore, adults and children should be offered remedial interventions or accommodations to improve function at home, work, or school. Appropriately trained professionals should deliver these interventions to address “objectively measured deficits in attention, processing speed, memory and learning, and performance of everyday functional tasks,” said the authors. Clinicians can consider contextualized treatment (eg, self-generated learning tasks) and noncontextualized treatment (eg, memory-retrieval practice and computer-based attention interventions) for remediation of everyday activities, according to the recommendations.
Emerging research supports the potential for exercise to benefit cognitive processing speed in patients with MS. Trials of symptomatic pharmacologic treatments for cognitive impairment related to MS have yielded inconclusive results, however. In addition, few pivotal trials of disease-modifying therapies have incorporated cognitive outcome measures.
—Erik Greb
Suggested Reading
Kalb R, Beier M, Benedict RH, et al. Recommendations for cognitive screening and management in multiple sclerosis care. Mult Scler. 2018 Oct 10 [Epub ahead of print].
Baseline screening and periodic reassessments aid in the monitoring of treatment response and disease progression.
Baseline screening and periodic reassessments aid in the monitoring of treatment response and disease progression.
The National Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Society has developed recommendations for the identification and management of cognitive impairment in MS. The recommendations, which were endorsed by the Consortium of MS Centers and the International MS Cognition Society, were published online ahead of print October 10 in Multiple Sclerosis Journal.
Cognitive change may affect between 34% and 65% of adults with MS. Decreases in information processing and memory are the most common changes, and cognitive impairment may arise before MRI abnormalities that indicate MS. These changes can affect patients’ ability to work, drive, manage money, and participate in activities.
Patients and Clinicians Need Information
Patients and caregivers should receive information about common cognitive changes in MS and how they affect everyday life, said Rosalind Kalb, PhD, Vice President of the Professional Resource Center at the National MS Society in New York, and coauthors. Patients and caregivers also should be told about the high prevalence of cognitive symptoms in MS and the need for ongoing assessments. Similarly, clinicians need information about how cognitive impairments affect medical decision-making and adherence, said the authors. Clinicians also need referral resources for cognitive assessment and treatment.
All adults and children age 8 or older diagnosed with MS should, as a minimum, undergo early baseline screening with the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) or another validated screening tool, according to the recommendations. These patients should be reassessed with the same instrument annually or more often, as needed, to detect disease activity, assess for treatment effects or relapse recovery, monitor progression of cognitive impairment, and screen for new cognitive problems.
In addition to the SDMT, screening tools that have been validated in patients with MS include the Processing Speed Test, Computerized Speed Cognitive Test, MS Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire, Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS, Brief Repeatable Neuropsychological Battery, and Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS.
Interventions May Improve or Maintain Function
An adult who tests positive for cognitive impairment on initial screening should undergo a more comprehensive assessment, especially if the person has comorbidities that raise concerns or is applying for disability due to cognitive impairment. A child with an unexplained change in school performance should receive a neuropsychologic evaluation, said Dr. Kalb and colleagues.
Furthermore, adults and children should be offered remedial interventions or accommodations to improve function at home, work, or school. Appropriately trained professionals should deliver these interventions to address “objectively measured deficits in attention, processing speed, memory and learning, and performance of everyday functional tasks,” said the authors. Clinicians can consider contextualized treatment (eg, self-generated learning tasks) and noncontextualized treatment (eg, memory-retrieval practice and computer-based attention interventions) for remediation of everyday activities, according to the recommendations.
Emerging research supports the potential for exercise to benefit cognitive processing speed in patients with MS. Trials of symptomatic pharmacologic treatments for cognitive impairment related to MS have yielded inconclusive results, however. In addition, few pivotal trials of disease-modifying therapies have incorporated cognitive outcome measures.
—Erik Greb
Suggested Reading
Kalb R, Beier M, Benedict RH, et al. Recommendations for cognitive screening and management in multiple sclerosis care. Mult Scler. 2018 Oct 10 [Epub ahead of print].
The National Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Society has developed recommendations for the identification and management of cognitive impairment in MS. The recommendations, which were endorsed by the Consortium of MS Centers and the International MS Cognition Society, were published online ahead of print October 10 in Multiple Sclerosis Journal.
Cognitive change may affect between 34% and 65% of adults with MS. Decreases in information processing and memory are the most common changes, and cognitive impairment may arise before MRI abnormalities that indicate MS. These changes can affect patients’ ability to work, drive, manage money, and participate in activities.
Patients and Clinicians Need Information
Patients and caregivers should receive information about common cognitive changes in MS and how they affect everyday life, said Rosalind Kalb, PhD, Vice President of the Professional Resource Center at the National MS Society in New York, and coauthors. Patients and caregivers also should be told about the high prevalence of cognitive symptoms in MS and the need for ongoing assessments. Similarly, clinicians need information about how cognitive impairments affect medical decision-making and adherence, said the authors. Clinicians also need referral resources for cognitive assessment and treatment.
All adults and children age 8 or older diagnosed with MS should, as a minimum, undergo early baseline screening with the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) or another validated screening tool, according to the recommendations. These patients should be reassessed with the same instrument annually or more often, as needed, to detect disease activity, assess for treatment effects or relapse recovery, monitor progression of cognitive impairment, and screen for new cognitive problems.
In addition to the SDMT, screening tools that have been validated in patients with MS include the Processing Speed Test, Computerized Speed Cognitive Test, MS Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire, Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS, Brief Repeatable Neuropsychological Battery, and Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS.
Interventions May Improve or Maintain Function
An adult who tests positive for cognitive impairment on initial screening should undergo a more comprehensive assessment, especially if the person has comorbidities that raise concerns or is applying for disability due to cognitive impairment. A child with an unexplained change in school performance should receive a neuropsychologic evaluation, said Dr. Kalb and colleagues.
Furthermore, adults and children should be offered remedial interventions or accommodations to improve function at home, work, or school. Appropriately trained professionals should deliver these interventions to address “objectively measured deficits in attention, processing speed, memory and learning, and performance of everyday functional tasks,” said the authors. Clinicians can consider contextualized treatment (eg, self-generated learning tasks) and noncontextualized treatment (eg, memory-retrieval practice and computer-based attention interventions) for remediation of everyday activities, according to the recommendations.
Emerging research supports the potential for exercise to benefit cognitive processing speed in patients with MS. Trials of symptomatic pharmacologic treatments for cognitive impairment related to MS have yielded inconclusive results, however. In addition, few pivotal trials of disease-modifying therapies have incorporated cognitive outcome measures.
—Erik Greb
Suggested Reading
Kalb R, Beier M, Benedict RH, et al. Recommendations for cognitive screening and management in multiple sclerosis care. Mult Scler. 2018 Oct 10 [Epub ahead of print].
Increased risk of atrial fibrillation with migraine aura
The presence of visual aura during migraine is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, a study in Neurology has found.
Researchers reported an analysis of data from the longitudinal, community-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, which included 11,939 individuals with no history of atrial fibrillation or stroke. Of these, 426 experienced migraines with visual aura, 1,090 experienced migraines without aura, 1,018 experienced nonmigraine headache, and 9,405 experienced no headache.
After adjustment for age and sex, individuals who had migraine with visual aura showed a significant 46% increase in the risk of incident atrial fibrillation when compared with those who experienced migraine without aura and a 39% increased risk when compared with individuals who did not experience headache (P = .004). After adjustment for risk factors such as hypertension, smoking, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart failure, the hazard ratio of incident atrial fibrillation was 1.30 for migraineurs with aura, compared with people without headache. In addition, the hazard ratio of incident atrial fibrillation was 1.39 for migraineurs with aura, compared with migraineurs without aura.
In contrast, individuals who experienced migraines without aura did not show a significantly increased risk of atrial fibrillation.
“This finding has important clinical implications and may help us better understand the atrial fibrillation mediation of the migraine-stroke link,” wrote Souvik Sen, MD, MPH, a professor in the department of neurology at the University of South Carolina, Columbia, and his coauthors. “A randomized clinical trial may help ascertain whether patients with migraine with visual aura may benefit from atrial fibrillation detection and subsequent anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy as a primary stroke prevention strategy.”
The study also showed a significant interaction with age and sex. While men who experienced migraine with aura had an 89% higher risk of atrial fibrillation, women with aura showed no increase in risk, compared with individuals who experienced no headache. Similarly, only individuals aged 60 years or older who experienced migraine with aura showed an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, while those younger than 60 years did not.
The authors noted that previous case reports have recorded the incidence of atrial fibrillation during a migraine attack. Autonomic dysfunction influences the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation and migraine.
“Cardiac arrhythmia recordings have been shown to be present in ECGs of patients while experiencing migraine headaches as compared with migraine-free phases,” they wrote. “This hypothesis is further supported by atrial fibrillation ablation procedures that have shown tendencies to reduce migraine symptoms and frequencies.”
In regard to the role that migraine aura played in this, they speculated as to whether migraine aura could be the result of cardioembolic stroke that might have occurred because of the atrial fibrillation.
Overall, 167 patients had incident cardioembolic strokes, and researchers suggested strokes in 87% of these cases could be attributed to the atrial fibrillation that came before the stroke.
The stroke incidence rate also was around twice as high in individuals who experienced migraine with aura, compared with those who experienced migraine without aura (4.1 per 1,000 person-years vs. 2.07 per 1,000 person-years).
The study authors acknowledged that patent foramen ovale, which was not assessed in ARIC, is a possible confounder. Previous studies have showed that patent foramen ovale is more common in younger individuals with migraine and particularly in patients who experience migraine with aura.
However, they also noted that trials of patent foramen ovale closures as a treatment for migraine have not shown success in reducing migraine frequency and, therefore, argued against patent foramen ovale as being a major confounder.
The study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the American Heart Association. One author declared grants from the National Institutes of health, one declared research support from Tian Medical, and one author is an associate editor for Neurology. No other conflicts of interest were declared.
SOURCE: Sen S et al. Neurology. 2018;91:1-9.
This article was updated 12/12/18.
The presence of visual aura during migraine is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, a study in Neurology has found.
Researchers reported an analysis of data from the longitudinal, community-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, which included 11,939 individuals with no history of atrial fibrillation or stroke. Of these, 426 experienced migraines with visual aura, 1,090 experienced migraines without aura, 1,018 experienced nonmigraine headache, and 9,405 experienced no headache.
After adjustment for age and sex, individuals who had migraine with visual aura showed a significant 46% increase in the risk of incident atrial fibrillation when compared with those who experienced migraine without aura and a 39% increased risk when compared with individuals who did not experience headache (P = .004). After adjustment for risk factors such as hypertension, smoking, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart failure, the hazard ratio of incident atrial fibrillation was 1.30 for migraineurs with aura, compared with people without headache. In addition, the hazard ratio of incident atrial fibrillation was 1.39 for migraineurs with aura, compared with migraineurs without aura.
In contrast, individuals who experienced migraines without aura did not show a significantly increased risk of atrial fibrillation.
“This finding has important clinical implications and may help us better understand the atrial fibrillation mediation of the migraine-stroke link,” wrote Souvik Sen, MD, MPH, a professor in the department of neurology at the University of South Carolina, Columbia, and his coauthors. “A randomized clinical trial may help ascertain whether patients with migraine with visual aura may benefit from atrial fibrillation detection and subsequent anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy as a primary stroke prevention strategy.”
The study also showed a significant interaction with age and sex. While men who experienced migraine with aura had an 89% higher risk of atrial fibrillation, women with aura showed no increase in risk, compared with individuals who experienced no headache. Similarly, only individuals aged 60 years or older who experienced migraine with aura showed an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, while those younger than 60 years did not.
The authors noted that previous case reports have recorded the incidence of atrial fibrillation during a migraine attack. Autonomic dysfunction influences the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation and migraine.
“Cardiac arrhythmia recordings have been shown to be present in ECGs of patients while experiencing migraine headaches as compared with migraine-free phases,” they wrote. “This hypothesis is further supported by atrial fibrillation ablation procedures that have shown tendencies to reduce migraine symptoms and frequencies.”
In regard to the role that migraine aura played in this, they speculated as to whether migraine aura could be the result of cardioembolic stroke that might have occurred because of the atrial fibrillation.
Overall, 167 patients had incident cardioembolic strokes, and researchers suggested strokes in 87% of these cases could be attributed to the atrial fibrillation that came before the stroke.
The stroke incidence rate also was around twice as high in individuals who experienced migraine with aura, compared with those who experienced migraine without aura (4.1 per 1,000 person-years vs. 2.07 per 1,000 person-years).
The study authors acknowledged that patent foramen ovale, which was not assessed in ARIC, is a possible confounder. Previous studies have showed that patent foramen ovale is more common in younger individuals with migraine and particularly in patients who experience migraine with aura.
However, they also noted that trials of patent foramen ovale closures as a treatment for migraine have not shown success in reducing migraine frequency and, therefore, argued against patent foramen ovale as being a major confounder.
The study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the American Heart Association. One author declared grants from the National Institutes of health, one declared research support from Tian Medical, and one author is an associate editor for Neurology. No other conflicts of interest were declared.
SOURCE: Sen S et al. Neurology. 2018;91:1-9.
This article was updated 12/12/18.
The presence of visual aura during migraine is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, a study in Neurology has found.
Researchers reported an analysis of data from the longitudinal, community-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, which included 11,939 individuals with no history of atrial fibrillation or stroke. Of these, 426 experienced migraines with visual aura, 1,090 experienced migraines without aura, 1,018 experienced nonmigraine headache, and 9,405 experienced no headache.
After adjustment for age and sex, individuals who had migraine with visual aura showed a significant 46% increase in the risk of incident atrial fibrillation when compared with those who experienced migraine without aura and a 39% increased risk when compared with individuals who did not experience headache (P = .004). After adjustment for risk factors such as hypertension, smoking, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart failure, the hazard ratio of incident atrial fibrillation was 1.30 for migraineurs with aura, compared with people without headache. In addition, the hazard ratio of incident atrial fibrillation was 1.39 for migraineurs with aura, compared with migraineurs without aura.
In contrast, individuals who experienced migraines without aura did not show a significantly increased risk of atrial fibrillation.
“This finding has important clinical implications and may help us better understand the atrial fibrillation mediation of the migraine-stroke link,” wrote Souvik Sen, MD, MPH, a professor in the department of neurology at the University of South Carolina, Columbia, and his coauthors. “A randomized clinical trial may help ascertain whether patients with migraine with visual aura may benefit from atrial fibrillation detection and subsequent anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy as a primary stroke prevention strategy.”
The study also showed a significant interaction with age and sex. While men who experienced migraine with aura had an 89% higher risk of atrial fibrillation, women with aura showed no increase in risk, compared with individuals who experienced no headache. Similarly, only individuals aged 60 years or older who experienced migraine with aura showed an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, while those younger than 60 years did not.
The authors noted that previous case reports have recorded the incidence of atrial fibrillation during a migraine attack. Autonomic dysfunction influences the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation and migraine.
“Cardiac arrhythmia recordings have been shown to be present in ECGs of patients while experiencing migraine headaches as compared with migraine-free phases,” they wrote. “This hypothesis is further supported by atrial fibrillation ablation procedures that have shown tendencies to reduce migraine symptoms and frequencies.”
In regard to the role that migraine aura played in this, they speculated as to whether migraine aura could be the result of cardioembolic stroke that might have occurred because of the atrial fibrillation.
Overall, 167 patients had incident cardioembolic strokes, and researchers suggested strokes in 87% of these cases could be attributed to the atrial fibrillation that came before the stroke.
The stroke incidence rate also was around twice as high in individuals who experienced migraine with aura, compared with those who experienced migraine without aura (4.1 per 1,000 person-years vs. 2.07 per 1,000 person-years).
The study authors acknowledged that patent foramen ovale, which was not assessed in ARIC, is a possible confounder. Previous studies have showed that patent foramen ovale is more common in younger individuals with migraine and particularly in patients who experience migraine with aura.
However, they also noted that trials of patent foramen ovale closures as a treatment for migraine have not shown success in reducing migraine frequency and, therefore, argued against patent foramen ovale as being a major confounder.
The study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the American Heart Association. One author declared grants from the National Institutes of health, one declared research support from Tian Medical, and one author is an associate editor for Neurology. No other conflicts of interest were declared.
SOURCE: Sen S et al. Neurology. 2018;91:1-9.
This article was updated 12/12/18.
FROM NEUROLOGY
Key clinical point: Aura in migraine is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation.
Major finding: Individuals who experience migraine with aura have a 39% higher risk of atrial fibrillation than do those without aura or without migraine.
Study details: The longitudinal, community-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study in 11,939 individuals.
Disclosures: The study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the American Heart Association. One author declared grants from the National Institutes of health, one declared research support from Tian Medical, and one author is an associate editor for Neurology. No other conflicts of interest were declared.
Source: Sen S et al. Neurology. 2018;91:1-9.
Can biomarkers detect concussions? It’s complicated
A series of three studies in college students showed that some serum markers are associated with concussion but the background level of the markers can vary considerably. There was no association between the markers and history of concussion, and they markers varied significantly by sex and race.
The work, published in Neurology, suggests that there is hope for finding biomarkers for concussion, but much more work needs to be done.
Serum levels of amyloid beta 42 (Abeta42), total tau, and S100 calcium binding protein B (S100B) were associated with concussion, especially when tests were performed within 4 hours of the injury. However, the varying background levels indicate that these biomarkers are not yet ready for clinical application.
All three studies looked at serum levels of Abeta42, total tau, S100B, ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2), and 2’,3’-cyclic-nucleotide 3’-phosphodiesterase (CNPase).
In the first study, researchers recruited 415 college athletes without a concussion (61% male, 40% white). The researchers took measurements outside of the athletes’ competitive sports season to maximize the odds that the levels would represent a true baseline. The median time between blood draw and the last risk of head impact was 80 days (mean, 98.4 days; interquartile range, 38-204 days).
Males had higher levels of UCH-L1 (Cohen d = 0.75; P less than .001) and S100B (Cohen d = 0.56; P less than .001), while females had higher levels of CNPase (Cohen d = 0.43; P less than .001). White subjects had higher levels of Abeta42 (Cohen d = .28; P = .005) and CNPase (Cohen d = 0.46; P less than .001). Black subjects had higher levels of UCH-L1 (Cohen d = 0.61; P less than .001) and S100 B (Cohen d = 1.1; P less than .001).
The measurements were not particularly reliable, with retests over 6- to 12-month periods yielding varying results such that none of the test/retest cutoff points reached the cutoff for acceptable reliability.
The second study was an observational cohort study of the same 415 subjects. The researchers assessed the self-reported concussion history and the cumulative exposure to collision sports with serum levels of the above biomarkers. The only relationship between a biomarker history and self-reported concussions was higher baseline Abeta42, but that had a small effect size (P = .005). Among football players, there was no association between approximate number of head impacts and any baseline biomarker.
The third study looked at 31 subjects who had experienced a sports-related concussion, 29 of whom had had both a baseline and a postconcussion blood draw, and compared them with nonconcussed, demographically matched athletes.
Of all the biomarkers studied, only levels of S100B rose following a concussion, with 67% of concussed subjects experiencing such a change (P = .003). When the researchers restricted the analysis to subjects who had a blood draw within 4 hours of the concussion, 88% of the tests showed an increase (P = .001). UCH-L1 also rose in 86% of subjects, but this change was not significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons (P greater than .007).
Compared with controls, concussed individuals had significantly higher levels of Abeta42, total tau, S100B, and GFAP. Of the concussed patients, 79.4% had Abeta42 levels higher than the median of controls, 67.6% had higher levels of total tau than the median of controls, and 83.3% had higher levels of S100B. Restriction of analysis to blood drawn within 4 hours of the injury yielded values of 81.3%, 75.0%, and 88.2%, respectively.
When limited to blood draws taken within 4 hours of injury, the researchers found fair diagnostic accuracy for measurements of Abeta42 (area under the curve, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.91), total tau (AUC, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.90), and S100B (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64-0.85). Abeta42 concentrations higher than 13.7 pg/mL were 75.0% sensitive and 82.4% specific to a sports-related concussion. Total tau concentrations higher than 1.7 pg/mL detected sports-related concussions at 75.0% sensitivity and 66.3% specificity, with acceptable diagnostic accuracy for white subjects (AUC, 0.82, 95% CI, 0.72-0.93). Also for white participants, S100B concentrations higher than 53 pg/mL predicted sports-related concussions with 83.3% sensitivity and 74.6% specificity.
The researchers found no associations between biomarkers and performance on clinical tests or time away from sports.
SOURCE: BM Asken et al. Neurology. 2018. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006613.
Concussion diagnosis has been constrained by reliance on subjective evidence, particularly in mild cases. Concussions also often result from a wide range of injuries, but focusing on sports-related concussions offers a chance to study biomarkers in a more controlled way.
These three studies represent the most comprehensive sports-related concussion biomarker work to date. The message may be that, for sports-related concussions, serum biomarkers may be able to detect the occurrence of a concussion, but they cannot predict motor, neurobehavioral, or neurocognitive outcome measures.
The study results also underline the need for larger, more complex prospective studies.
Erin Bigler, PhD, is a professor of psychology and neuroscience at Brigham Young University. Ellen Deibert, MD, is a neurologist in York, Pa. These comments were taken from an accompanying editorial (Neurology. 2018. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006609 ). Dr. Bigler and Dr. Deibert have no relevant conflicts of interest.
Concussion diagnosis has been constrained by reliance on subjective evidence, particularly in mild cases. Concussions also often result from a wide range of injuries, but focusing on sports-related concussions offers a chance to study biomarkers in a more controlled way.
These three studies represent the most comprehensive sports-related concussion biomarker work to date. The message may be that, for sports-related concussions, serum biomarkers may be able to detect the occurrence of a concussion, but they cannot predict motor, neurobehavioral, or neurocognitive outcome measures.
The study results also underline the need for larger, more complex prospective studies.
Erin Bigler, PhD, is a professor of psychology and neuroscience at Brigham Young University. Ellen Deibert, MD, is a neurologist in York, Pa. These comments were taken from an accompanying editorial (Neurology. 2018. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006609 ). Dr. Bigler and Dr. Deibert have no relevant conflicts of interest.
Concussion diagnosis has been constrained by reliance on subjective evidence, particularly in mild cases. Concussions also often result from a wide range of injuries, but focusing on sports-related concussions offers a chance to study biomarkers in a more controlled way.
These three studies represent the most comprehensive sports-related concussion biomarker work to date. The message may be that, for sports-related concussions, serum biomarkers may be able to detect the occurrence of a concussion, but they cannot predict motor, neurobehavioral, or neurocognitive outcome measures.
The study results also underline the need for larger, more complex prospective studies.
Erin Bigler, PhD, is a professor of psychology and neuroscience at Brigham Young University. Ellen Deibert, MD, is a neurologist in York, Pa. These comments were taken from an accompanying editorial (Neurology. 2018. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006609 ). Dr. Bigler and Dr. Deibert have no relevant conflicts of interest.
A series of three studies in college students showed that some serum markers are associated with concussion but the background level of the markers can vary considerably. There was no association between the markers and history of concussion, and they markers varied significantly by sex and race.
The work, published in Neurology, suggests that there is hope for finding biomarkers for concussion, but much more work needs to be done.
Serum levels of amyloid beta 42 (Abeta42), total tau, and S100 calcium binding protein B (S100B) were associated with concussion, especially when tests were performed within 4 hours of the injury. However, the varying background levels indicate that these biomarkers are not yet ready for clinical application.
All three studies looked at serum levels of Abeta42, total tau, S100B, ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2), and 2’,3’-cyclic-nucleotide 3’-phosphodiesterase (CNPase).
In the first study, researchers recruited 415 college athletes without a concussion (61% male, 40% white). The researchers took measurements outside of the athletes’ competitive sports season to maximize the odds that the levels would represent a true baseline. The median time between blood draw and the last risk of head impact was 80 days (mean, 98.4 days; interquartile range, 38-204 days).
Males had higher levels of UCH-L1 (Cohen d = 0.75; P less than .001) and S100B (Cohen d = 0.56; P less than .001), while females had higher levels of CNPase (Cohen d = 0.43; P less than .001). White subjects had higher levels of Abeta42 (Cohen d = .28; P = .005) and CNPase (Cohen d = 0.46; P less than .001). Black subjects had higher levels of UCH-L1 (Cohen d = 0.61; P less than .001) and S100 B (Cohen d = 1.1; P less than .001).
The measurements were not particularly reliable, with retests over 6- to 12-month periods yielding varying results such that none of the test/retest cutoff points reached the cutoff for acceptable reliability.
The second study was an observational cohort study of the same 415 subjects. The researchers assessed the self-reported concussion history and the cumulative exposure to collision sports with serum levels of the above biomarkers. The only relationship between a biomarker history and self-reported concussions was higher baseline Abeta42, but that had a small effect size (P = .005). Among football players, there was no association between approximate number of head impacts and any baseline biomarker.
The third study looked at 31 subjects who had experienced a sports-related concussion, 29 of whom had had both a baseline and a postconcussion blood draw, and compared them with nonconcussed, demographically matched athletes.
Of all the biomarkers studied, only levels of S100B rose following a concussion, with 67% of concussed subjects experiencing such a change (P = .003). When the researchers restricted the analysis to subjects who had a blood draw within 4 hours of the concussion, 88% of the tests showed an increase (P = .001). UCH-L1 also rose in 86% of subjects, but this change was not significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons (P greater than .007).
Compared with controls, concussed individuals had significantly higher levels of Abeta42, total tau, S100B, and GFAP. Of the concussed patients, 79.4% had Abeta42 levels higher than the median of controls, 67.6% had higher levels of total tau than the median of controls, and 83.3% had higher levels of S100B. Restriction of analysis to blood drawn within 4 hours of the injury yielded values of 81.3%, 75.0%, and 88.2%, respectively.
When limited to blood draws taken within 4 hours of injury, the researchers found fair diagnostic accuracy for measurements of Abeta42 (area under the curve, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.91), total tau (AUC, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.90), and S100B (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64-0.85). Abeta42 concentrations higher than 13.7 pg/mL were 75.0% sensitive and 82.4% specific to a sports-related concussion. Total tau concentrations higher than 1.7 pg/mL detected sports-related concussions at 75.0% sensitivity and 66.3% specificity, with acceptable diagnostic accuracy for white subjects (AUC, 0.82, 95% CI, 0.72-0.93). Also for white participants, S100B concentrations higher than 53 pg/mL predicted sports-related concussions with 83.3% sensitivity and 74.6% specificity.
The researchers found no associations between biomarkers and performance on clinical tests or time away from sports.
SOURCE: BM Asken et al. Neurology. 2018. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006613.
A series of three studies in college students showed that some serum markers are associated with concussion but the background level of the markers can vary considerably. There was no association between the markers and history of concussion, and they markers varied significantly by sex and race.
The work, published in Neurology, suggests that there is hope for finding biomarkers for concussion, but much more work needs to be done.
Serum levels of amyloid beta 42 (Abeta42), total tau, and S100 calcium binding protein B (S100B) were associated with concussion, especially when tests were performed within 4 hours of the injury. However, the varying background levels indicate that these biomarkers are not yet ready for clinical application.
All three studies looked at serum levels of Abeta42, total tau, S100B, ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2), and 2’,3’-cyclic-nucleotide 3’-phosphodiesterase (CNPase).
In the first study, researchers recruited 415 college athletes without a concussion (61% male, 40% white). The researchers took measurements outside of the athletes’ competitive sports season to maximize the odds that the levels would represent a true baseline. The median time between blood draw and the last risk of head impact was 80 days (mean, 98.4 days; interquartile range, 38-204 days).
Males had higher levels of UCH-L1 (Cohen d = 0.75; P less than .001) and S100B (Cohen d = 0.56; P less than .001), while females had higher levels of CNPase (Cohen d = 0.43; P less than .001). White subjects had higher levels of Abeta42 (Cohen d = .28; P = .005) and CNPase (Cohen d = 0.46; P less than .001). Black subjects had higher levels of UCH-L1 (Cohen d = 0.61; P less than .001) and S100 B (Cohen d = 1.1; P less than .001).
The measurements were not particularly reliable, with retests over 6- to 12-month periods yielding varying results such that none of the test/retest cutoff points reached the cutoff for acceptable reliability.
The second study was an observational cohort study of the same 415 subjects. The researchers assessed the self-reported concussion history and the cumulative exposure to collision sports with serum levels of the above biomarkers. The only relationship between a biomarker history and self-reported concussions was higher baseline Abeta42, but that had a small effect size (P = .005). Among football players, there was no association between approximate number of head impacts and any baseline biomarker.
The third study looked at 31 subjects who had experienced a sports-related concussion, 29 of whom had had both a baseline and a postconcussion blood draw, and compared them with nonconcussed, demographically matched athletes.
Of all the biomarkers studied, only levels of S100B rose following a concussion, with 67% of concussed subjects experiencing such a change (P = .003). When the researchers restricted the analysis to subjects who had a blood draw within 4 hours of the concussion, 88% of the tests showed an increase (P = .001). UCH-L1 also rose in 86% of subjects, but this change was not significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons (P greater than .007).
Compared with controls, concussed individuals had significantly higher levels of Abeta42, total tau, S100B, and GFAP. Of the concussed patients, 79.4% had Abeta42 levels higher than the median of controls, 67.6% had higher levels of total tau than the median of controls, and 83.3% had higher levels of S100B. Restriction of analysis to blood drawn within 4 hours of the injury yielded values of 81.3%, 75.0%, and 88.2%, respectively.
When limited to blood draws taken within 4 hours of injury, the researchers found fair diagnostic accuracy for measurements of Abeta42 (area under the curve, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.91), total tau (AUC, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.90), and S100B (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64-0.85). Abeta42 concentrations higher than 13.7 pg/mL were 75.0% sensitive and 82.4% specific to a sports-related concussion. Total tau concentrations higher than 1.7 pg/mL detected sports-related concussions at 75.0% sensitivity and 66.3% specificity, with acceptable diagnostic accuracy for white subjects (AUC, 0.82, 95% CI, 0.72-0.93). Also for white participants, S100B concentrations higher than 53 pg/mL predicted sports-related concussions with 83.3% sensitivity and 74.6% specificity.
The researchers found no associations between biomarkers and performance on clinical tests or time away from sports.
SOURCE: BM Asken et al. Neurology. 2018. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006613.
FROM NEUROLOGY
Key clinical point: Serum biomarkers show promise in concussion diagnosis, but much work remains.
Major finding: Serum levels of Abeta42, total tau, and S100B were elevated after concussions.
Study details: Prospective studies on 415 college athletes.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the Head Health Initiative, Banyan Biomarkers, and the United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command.
Sources: BM Asken et al. Neurology. 2018. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006613.
Cognitive and Behavioral Problems Increase With ALS Disease Stage
Data raise the question of whether cognitive and behavioral change should be included in ALS diagnostic criteria.
Cognitive deficits and behavioral symptoms that are specific to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) occur more frequently as the disease progresses, according to research published online ahead of print September 12 in Neurology. Few patients are free of neuropsychologic impairment when they reach the final stage of the disease. It might be appropriate to include cognitive and behavioral change in the diagnostic criteria and future staging systems for ALS, said the authors.
In 2013, Elamin et al suggested that cognitive change in ALS may be associated with indirect measures of disease progression, such as total score on the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised. Christopher Crockford, PhD, a researcher at the University of Edinburgh, and colleagues sought to determine whether the cognitive and behavioral symptoms in ALS were more prevalent at more advanced stages of disease.
The Role of Letter Fluency Impairment
They conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study that included 161 patients from Edinburgh, Dublin, and London with possible, probable, or definite ALS, according to revised El Escorial diagnostic criteria. The researchers also recruited 80 healthy, matched controls. Through interviews, Dr. Crockford and colleagues elicited demographic and clinical data. They measured participants’ clinical staging with the King’s Clinical Staging System and neuropsychologic status with the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS).
The investigators did not observe significant differences between the patient and control groups in background variables. Approximately 67% of patients with ALS were male, compared with 60% of controls. Mean age at testing was approximately 61 in both groups. Among patients with ALS, 40 were in Stage 1, 45 were in Stage 2, 22 were in Stage 3, and 54 were in Stage 4.
Compared with controls, patients with ALS had significantly worse cognitive performance on all domains of the ECAS except visuospatial functioning. Dr. Crockford’s group found a significant cross-sectional effect across disease stages for ALS-specific functions (eg, executive, language, and letter fluency) and ECAS total score. They did not find a similar effect for ALS-nonspecific functions (eg, memory and visuospatial). In addition, rates of ALS-specific impairment and behavioral change increased with increasing disease stage.
Letter fluency impairment may explain the relationship between cognitive function and disease stage, said the authors. They observed higher rates of all behavioral problems in later King’s stages. Bulbar signs were significantly related to ALS-specific scores, ECAS total score, and behavioral scores. Site of onset was not related to these scores, however.
Intervention programs to alleviate the effect of patients’ neuropsychologic impairment on caregivers may be appropriate, said the authors. “Furthermore, clinicians should be cognizant of current neuropsychologic status when prescribing life-prolonging interventions to patients and implement support structures for those with a neuropsychologic impairment,” they added.
Informing Patients and Caregivers
Although Dr. Crockford and colleagues focused on the behavioral and cognitive effects of ALS, the disease may affect mental health as well, said Paul Wicks, PhD, Vice President of Innovation at PatientsLikeMe in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Steven M. Albert, PhD, Professor and Chair of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences at the University of Pittsburgh, in an accompanying editorial. The data show that the rates of major depression and depressed mood increase with increasing disease stage.
Drs. Wicks and Albert cited a survey in which 90% of patients and caregivers reported that their doctors had not told them that cognitive or psychologic symptoms can arise in ALS. “In our experience, colleagues report keeping the information from patients in order to spare them further distress,” they said. Yet most respondents to this survey reported that they would have liked to have been informed about these symptoms.
“Educating patients and caregivers that cognitive change is a part of ALS should be no different from similar discussions to be had in multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, and a range of other conditions,” said Drs. Wicks and Albert. “Keeping the truth from patients and caregivers is not protective; it is paternalistic, and it is time to stop. Only by facing up to the hard truth that one of the most dreaded conditions in medicine is even worse than we previously acknowledged can we take stock, marshal our resources, and make renewed plans to defeat our common enemy.”
Suggested Reading
Crockford C, Newton J, Lonergan K, et al. ALS-specific cognitive and behavior changes associated with advancing disease stage in ALS. Neurology. 2018 Sep 12 [Epub ahead of print].
Wicks P, Albert SM. It’s time to stop saying “the mind is unaffected” in ALS. Neurology. 2018 Sep 12 [Epub ahead of print].
Data raise the question of whether cognitive and behavioral change should be included in ALS diagnostic criteria.
Data raise the question of whether cognitive and behavioral change should be included in ALS diagnostic criteria.
Cognitive deficits and behavioral symptoms that are specific to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) occur more frequently as the disease progresses, according to research published online ahead of print September 12 in Neurology. Few patients are free of neuropsychologic impairment when they reach the final stage of the disease. It might be appropriate to include cognitive and behavioral change in the diagnostic criteria and future staging systems for ALS, said the authors.
In 2013, Elamin et al suggested that cognitive change in ALS may be associated with indirect measures of disease progression, such as total score on the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised. Christopher Crockford, PhD, a researcher at the University of Edinburgh, and colleagues sought to determine whether the cognitive and behavioral symptoms in ALS were more prevalent at more advanced stages of disease.
The Role of Letter Fluency Impairment
They conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study that included 161 patients from Edinburgh, Dublin, and London with possible, probable, or definite ALS, according to revised El Escorial diagnostic criteria. The researchers also recruited 80 healthy, matched controls. Through interviews, Dr. Crockford and colleagues elicited demographic and clinical data. They measured participants’ clinical staging with the King’s Clinical Staging System and neuropsychologic status with the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS).
The investigators did not observe significant differences between the patient and control groups in background variables. Approximately 67% of patients with ALS were male, compared with 60% of controls. Mean age at testing was approximately 61 in both groups. Among patients with ALS, 40 were in Stage 1, 45 were in Stage 2, 22 were in Stage 3, and 54 were in Stage 4.
Compared with controls, patients with ALS had significantly worse cognitive performance on all domains of the ECAS except visuospatial functioning. Dr. Crockford’s group found a significant cross-sectional effect across disease stages for ALS-specific functions (eg, executive, language, and letter fluency) and ECAS total score. They did not find a similar effect for ALS-nonspecific functions (eg, memory and visuospatial). In addition, rates of ALS-specific impairment and behavioral change increased with increasing disease stage.
Letter fluency impairment may explain the relationship between cognitive function and disease stage, said the authors. They observed higher rates of all behavioral problems in later King’s stages. Bulbar signs were significantly related to ALS-specific scores, ECAS total score, and behavioral scores. Site of onset was not related to these scores, however.
Intervention programs to alleviate the effect of patients’ neuropsychologic impairment on caregivers may be appropriate, said the authors. “Furthermore, clinicians should be cognizant of current neuropsychologic status when prescribing life-prolonging interventions to patients and implement support structures for those with a neuropsychologic impairment,” they added.
Informing Patients and Caregivers
Although Dr. Crockford and colleagues focused on the behavioral and cognitive effects of ALS, the disease may affect mental health as well, said Paul Wicks, PhD, Vice President of Innovation at PatientsLikeMe in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Steven M. Albert, PhD, Professor and Chair of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences at the University of Pittsburgh, in an accompanying editorial. The data show that the rates of major depression and depressed mood increase with increasing disease stage.
Drs. Wicks and Albert cited a survey in which 90% of patients and caregivers reported that their doctors had not told them that cognitive or psychologic symptoms can arise in ALS. “In our experience, colleagues report keeping the information from patients in order to spare them further distress,” they said. Yet most respondents to this survey reported that they would have liked to have been informed about these symptoms.
“Educating patients and caregivers that cognitive change is a part of ALS should be no different from similar discussions to be had in multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, and a range of other conditions,” said Drs. Wicks and Albert. “Keeping the truth from patients and caregivers is not protective; it is paternalistic, and it is time to stop. Only by facing up to the hard truth that one of the most dreaded conditions in medicine is even worse than we previously acknowledged can we take stock, marshal our resources, and make renewed plans to defeat our common enemy.”
Suggested Reading
Crockford C, Newton J, Lonergan K, et al. ALS-specific cognitive and behavior changes associated with advancing disease stage in ALS. Neurology. 2018 Sep 12 [Epub ahead of print].
Wicks P, Albert SM. It’s time to stop saying “the mind is unaffected” in ALS. Neurology. 2018 Sep 12 [Epub ahead of print].
Cognitive deficits and behavioral symptoms that are specific to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) occur more frequently as the disease progresses, according to research published online ahead of print September 12 in Neurology. Few patients are free of neuropsychologic impairment when they reach the final stage of the disease. It might be appropriate to include cognitive and behavioral change in the diagnostic criteria and future staging systems for ALS, said the authors.
In 2013, Elamin et al suggested that cognitive change in ALS may be associated with indirect measures of disease progression, such as total score on the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised. Christopher Crockford, PhD, a researcher at the University of Edinburgh, and colleagues sought to determine whether the cognitive and behavioral symptoms in ALS were more prevalent at more advanced stages of disease.
The Role of Letter Fluency Impairment
They conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study that included 161 patients from Edinburgh, Dublin, and London with possible, probable, or definite ALS, according to revised El Escorial diagnostic criteria. The researchers also recruited 80 healthy, matched controls. Through interviews, Dr. Crockford and colleagues elicited demographic and clinical data. They measured participants’ clinical staging with the King’s Clinical Staging System and neuropsychologic status with the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS).
The investigators did not observe significant differences between the patient and control groups in background variables. Approximately 67% of patients with ALS were male, compared with 60% of controls. Mean age at testing was approximately 61 in both groups. Among patients with ALS, 40 were in Stage 1, 45 were in Stage 2, 22 were in Stage 3, and 54 were in Stage 4.
Compared with controls, patients with ALS had significantly worse cognitive performance on all domains of the ECAS except visuospatial functioning. Dr. Crockford’s group found a significant cross-sectional effect across disease stages for ALS-specific functions (eg, executive, language, and letter fluency) and ECAS total score. They did not find a similar effect for ALS-nonspecific functions (eg, memory and visuospatial). In addition, rates of ALS-specific impairment and behavioral change increased with increasing disease stage.
Letter fluency impairment may explain the relationship between cognitive function and disease stage, said the authors. They observed higher rates of all behavioral problems in later King’s stages. Bulbar signs were significantly related to ALS-specific scores, ECAS total score, and behavioral scores. Site of onset was not related to these scores, however.
Intervention programs to alleviate the effect of patients’ neuropsychologic impairment on caregivers may be appropriate, said the authors. “Furthermore, clinicians should be cognizant of current neuropsychologic status when prescribing life-prolonging interventions to patients and implement support structures for those with a neuropsychologic impairment,” they added.
Informing Patients and Caregivers
Although Dr. Crockford and colleagues focused on the behavioral and cognitive effects of ALS, the disease may affect mental health as well, said Paul Wicks, PhD, Vice President of Innovation at PatientsLikeMe in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Steven M. Albert, PhD, Professor and Chair of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences at the University of Pittsburgh, in an accompanying editorial. The data show that the rates of major depression and depressed mood increase with increasing disease stage.
Drs. Wicks and Albert cited a survey in which 90% of patients and caregivers reported that their doctors had not told them that cognitive or psychologic symptoms can arise in ALS. “In our experience, colleagues report keeping the information from patients in order to spare them further distress,” they said. Yet most respondents to this survey reported that they would have liked to have been informed about these symptoms.
“Educating patients and caregivers that cognitive change is a part of ALS should be no different from similar discussions to be had in multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, and a range of other conditions,” said Drs. Wicks and Albert. “Keeping the truth from patients and caregivers is not protective; it is paternalistic, and it is time to stop. Only by facing up to the hard truth that one of the most dreaded conditions in medicine is even worse than we previously acknowledged can we take stock, marshal our resources, and make renewed plans to defeat our common enemy.”
Suggested Reading
Crockford C, Newton J, Lonergan K, et al. ALS-specific cognitive and behavior changes associated with advancing disease stage in ALS. Neurology. 2018 Sep 12 [Epub ahead of print].
Wicks P, Albert SM. It’s time to stop saying “the mind is unaffected” in ALS. Neurology. 2018 Sep 12 [Epub ahead of print].
Modeling Favors Immediate AED Treatment After an Unprovoked First Seizure
Factoring in quality of life, seizure risk, and side effects, a model prefers immediate over delayed treatment.
Immediate treatment of a first unprovoked seizure may be preferable to delayed treatment over a wide range of patients, including those who are at low risk of recurrent seizures, results of a decision analysis suggest.
Taking into account quality of life, seizure risk, and antiepileptic drug (AED) side effects, a model favored treatment of a patient with a single unprovoked seizure who did not meet the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) definition of epilepsy, investigators reported.
The model also favored treatment of patients who did meet ILAE criteria, namely, a 10-year recurrence risk greater than 60% in a patient with a single unprovoked seizure, according to the analysis, which was published in the October 9 issue of Neurology.
Together, these findings suggest that the current ILAE epilepsy definition is “too simplistic” for deciding whether to start or withhold AED treatment after a first unprovoked seizure, said M. Brandon Westover, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Neurology at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and his coauthors.
“A more precise and patient-personalized definition of epilepsy should encompass not only seizure recurrence probability but also a multitude of other risks and benefits associated with AED treatment,” they said.
Weighing Risks and Benefits
To determine which patients with a first unprovoked seizure might benefit from immediate AED treatment, Dr. Westover and his colleagues used a decision model with measures constructed from retrospective clinical trial data.
The goal of the simulation was to determine which treatment strategy—immediate or delayed AED treatment—would maximize the patient’s expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Toward that end, Dr. Westover and his coinvestigators considered three base cases, which represented various degrees of seizure-recurrence risk.
The first case was a 30-year-old man with no risk factors for recurrent seizure other than having had a first seizure. In that case, immediate and deferred AED treatment resulted in 19.04 and 18.65 QALYs, respectively.
“In dollar values, using the conservative approximation of $50,000/QALY gained, this difference in treatment outcomes would amount to $19,500 gained per individual,” Dr. Westover and his coauthors wrote in their report.
The second case was a 30-year-old woman who presented with a first unprovoked seizure and had positive MRI results that establish a high risk of recurrence. As expected, because of the high recurrence risk, this scenario also favored immediate treatment, with 15.23 and 14.75 QALYs, respectively, for the immediate and deferred strategies.
The final case was a wheelchair-bound 60-year-old woman with a first unprovoked seizure and high risk of recurrence, but also a high risk of AED adverse effects and a smaller expected quality of life reduction from further seizures. In this scenario, in which treatment might be “intuitively discouraged” because of the AED side-effect risk, the cohort simulation favored deferred AED treatment by a small margin, the investigators said.
“A high baseline risk for recurrent seizures does not by itself always favor immediate AED treatment,” they said.
Findings May Shift Discussions About Therapy
The conclusion of this decision analysis by Dr. Westover and colleagues is “likely correct” that early treatment of a first unprovoked seizure could be favorable in a wide range of clinical scenarios, according to the authors of an accompanying editorial.
The decision analysis is based on a reasonable, though not comprehensive, set of parameters to simulate base cases representative of common first-ever seizure clinical scenarios, said editorialists Claire S. Jacobs, MD, PhD, and Jong Woo Lee, MD, PhD, both with the Department of Neurology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.
Potentially the most controversial scenario addressed in the decision model, they noted, is the patient with low seizure recurrence risk but substantial quality of life decline upon recurrence. While that patient would not meet the commonly accepted 60% recurrence risk threshold that would indicate that treatment is warranted, this model favors immediate treatment because of the potentially disruptive effect of recurrence.
This study does not address important issues such as the cost of medication and patient preferences, they pointed out, and furthermore, QALYs can be difficult to integrate into clinical decision making.
Nonetheless, the findings are worth considering in clinical practice, the authors suggested. “At the very least, this study should, however subtly, shift the starting point of discussion with the patient toward a default of immediate, rather than deferred, treatment after a first unprovoked seizure and apparent absence of disease,” said Drs. Jacob and Lee.
The study was supported by NINDS.
—Andrew D. Bowser
Suggested Reading
Bao EL, Chao LY, Ni P, et al. Antiepileptic drug treatment after an unprovoked first seizure: a decision analysis. Neurology. 2018;91(15):e1429-e1439.
Jacobs CS, Lee JW. Immediate vs delayed treatment of first unprovoked seizure: to treat, or not to treat? Neurology. 2018;91(15):684-685.
Factoring in quality of life, seizure risk, and side effects, a model prefers immediate over delayed treatment.
Factoring in quality of life, seizure risk, and side effects, a model prefers immediate over delayed treatment.
Immediate treatment of a first unprovoked seizure may be preferable to delayed treatment over a wide range of patients, including those who are at low risk of recurrent seizures, results of a decision analysis suggest.
Taking into account quality of life, seizure risk, and antiepileptic drug (AED) side effects, a model favored treatment of a patient with a single unprovoked seizure who did not meet the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) definition of epilepsy, investigators reported.
The model also favored treatment of patients who did meet ILAE criteria, namely, a 10-year recurrence risk greater than 60% in a patient with a single unprovoked seizure, according to the analysis, which was published in the October 9 issue of Neurology.
Together, these findings suggest that the current ILAE epilepsy definition is “too simplistic” for deciding whether to start or withhold AED treatment after a first unprovoked seizure, said M. Brandon Westover, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Neurology at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and his coauthors.
“A more precise and patient-personalized definition of epilepsy should encompass not only seizure recurrence probability but also a multitude of other risks and benefits associated with AED treatment,” they said.
Weighing Risks and Benefits
To determine which patients with a first unprovoked seizure might benefit from immediate AED treatment, Dr. Westover and his colleagues used a decision model with measures constructed from retrospective clinical trial data.
The goal of the simulation was to determine which treatment strategy—immediate or delayed AED treatment—would maximize the patient’s expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Toward that end, Dr. Westover and his coinvestigators considered three base cases, which represented various degrees of seizure-recurrence risk.
The first case was a 30-year-old man with no risk factors for recurrent seizure other than having had a first seizure. In that case, immediate and deferred AED treatment resulted in 19.04 and 18.65 QALYs, respectively.
“In dollar values, using the conservative approximation of $50,000/QALY gained, this difference in treatment outcomes would amount to $19,500 gained per individual,” Dr. Westover and his coauthors wrote in their report.
The second case was a 30-year-old woman who presented with a first unprovoked seizure and had positive MRI results that establish a high risk of recurrence. As expected, because of the high recurrence risk, this scenario also favored immediate treatment, with 15.23 and 14.75 QALYs, respectively, for the immediate and deferred strategies.
The final case was a wheelchair-bound 60-year-old woman with a first unprovoked seizure and high risk of recurrence, but also a high risk of AED adverse effects and a smaller expected quality of life reduction from further seizures. In this scenario, in which treatment might be “intuitively discouraged” because of the AED side-effect risk, the cohort simulation favored deferred AED treatment by a small margin, the investigators said.
“A high baseline risk for recurrent seizures does not by itself always favor immediate AED treatment,” they said.
Findings May Shift Discussions About Therapy
The conclusion of this decision analysis by Dr. Westover and colleagues is “likely correct” that early treatment of a first unprovoked seizure could be favorable in a wide range of clinical scenarios, according to the authors of an accompanying editorial.
The decision analysis is based on a reasonable, though not comprehensive, set of parameters to simulate base cases representative of common first-ever seizure clinical scenarios, said editorialists Claire S. Jacobs, MD, PhD, and Jong Woo Lee, MD, PhD, both with the Department of Neurology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.
Potentially the most controversial scenario addressed in the decision model, they noted, is the patient with low seizure recurrence risk but substantial quality of life decline upon recurrence. While that patient would not meet the commonly accepted 60% recurrence risk threshold that would indicate that treatment is warranted, this model favors immediate treatment because of the potentially disruptive effect of recurrence.
This study does not address important issues such as the cost of medication and patient preferences, they pointed out, and furthermore, QALYs can be difficult to integrate into clinical decision making.
Nonetheless, the findings are worth considering in clinical practice, the authors suggested. “At the very least, this study should, however subtly, shift the starting point of discussion with the patient toward a default of immediate, rather than deferred, treatment after a first unprovoked seizure and apparent absence of disease,” said Drs. Jacob and Lee.
The study was supported by NINDS.
—Andrew D. Bowser
Suggested Reading
Bao EL, Chao LY, Ni P, et al. Antiepileptic drug treatment after an unprovoked first seizure: a decision analysis. Neurology. 2018;91(15):e1429-e1439.
Jacobs CS, Lee JW. Immediate vs delayed treatment of first unprovoked seizure: to treat, or not to treat? Neurology. 2018;91(15):684-685.
Immediate treatment of a first unprovoked seizure may be preferable to delayed treatment over a wide range of patients, including those who are at low risk of recurrent seizures, results of a decision analysis suggest.
Taking into account quality of life, seizure risk, and antiepileptic drug (AED) side effects, a model favored treatment of a patient with a single unprovoked seizure who did not meet the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) definition of epilepsy, investigators reported.
The model also favored treatment of patients who did meet ILAE criteria, namely, a 10-year recurrence risk greater than 60% in a patient with a single unprovoked seizure, according to the analysis, which was published in the October 9 issue of Neurology.
Together, these findings suggest that the current ILAE epilepsy definition is “too simplistic” for deciding whether to start or withhold AED treatment after a first unprovoked seizure, said M. Brandon Westover, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Neurology at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and his coauthors.
“A more precise and patient-personalized definition of epilepsy should encompass not only seizure recurrence probability but also a multitude of other risks and benefits associated with AED treatment,” they said.
Weighing Risks and Benefits
To determine which patients with a first unprovoked seizure might benefit from immediate AED treatment, Dr. Westover and his colleagues used a decision model with measures constructed from retrospective clinical trial data.
The goal of the simulation was to determine which treatment strategy—immediate or delayed AED treatment—would maximize the patient’s expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Toward that end, Dr. Westover and his coinvestigators considered three base cases, which represented various degrees of seizure-recurrence risk.
The first case was a 30-year-old man with no risk factors for recurrent seizure other than having had a first seizure. In that case, immediate and deferred AED treatment resulted in 19.04 and 18.65 QALYs, respectively.
“In dollar values, using the conservative approximation of $50,000/QALY gained, this difference in treatment outcomes would amount to $19,500 gained per individual,” Dr. Westover and his coauthors wrote in their report.
The second case was a 30-year-old woman who presented with a first unprovoked seizure and had positive MRI results that establish a high risk of recurrence. As expected, because of the high recurrence risk, this scenario also favored immediate treatment, with 15.23 and 14.75 QALYs, respectively, for the immediate and deferred strategies.
The final case was a wheelchair-bound 60-year-old woman with a first unprovoked seizure and high risk of recurrence, but also a high risk of AED adverse effects and a smaller expected quality of life reduction from further seizures. In this scenario, in which treatment might be “intuitively discouraged” because of the AED side-effect risk, the cohort simulation favored deferred AED treatment by a small margin, the investigators said.
“A high baseline risk for recurrent seizures does not by itself always favor immediate AED treatment,” they said.
Findings May Shift Discussions About Therapy
The conclusion of this decision analysis by Dr. Westover and colleagues is “likely correct” that early treatment of a first unprovoked seizure could be favorable in a wide range of clinical scenarios, according to the authors of an accompanying editorial.
The decision analysis is based on a reasonable, though not comprehensive, set of parameters to simulate base cases representative of common first-ever seizure clinical scenarios, said editorialists Claire S. Jacobs, MD, PhD, and Jong Woo Lee, MD, PhD, both with the Department of Neurology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.
Potentially the most controversial scenario addressed in the decision model, they noted, is the patient with low seizure recurrence risk but substantial quality of life decline upon recurrence. While that patient would not meet the commonly accepted 60% recurrence risk threshold that would indicate that treatment is warranted, this model favors immediate treatment because of the potentially disruptive effect of recurrence.
This study does not address important issues such as the cost of medication and patient preferences, they pointed out, and furthermore, QALYs can be difficult to integrate into clinical decision making.
Nonetheless, the findings are worth considering in clinical practice, the authors suggested. “At the very least, this study should, however subtly, shift the starting point of discussion with the patient toward a default of immediate, rather than deferred, treatment after a first unprovoked seizure and apparent absence of disease,” said Drs. Jacob and Lee.
The study was supported by NINDS.
—Andrew D. Bowser
Suggested Reading
Bao EL, Chao LY, Ni P, et al. Antiepileptic drug treatment after an unprovoked first seizure: a decision analysis. Neurology. 2018;91(15):e1429-e1439.
Jacobs CS, Lee JW. Immediate vs delayed treatment of first unprovoked seizure: to treat, or not to treat? Neurology. 2018;91(15):684-685.
Novel Nordic Study Reveals Diclofenac’s Cardiovascular Risks
Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was increased by 50%, compared with no therapy.
In the largest analysis ever of cardiovascular risk associated with the initiation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), diclofenac was associated with higher risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The study findings were published online September 4 in BMJ.
Those beginning diclofenac had a 50% increased 30-day risk for a composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), compared with individuals who did not initiate an NSAID or acetaminophen (95% confidence interval for incidence rate ratio, 1.4–1.7).
The risk was still significantly elevated when the study’s first author, Morten Schmidt, MD, PhD, of the Department of Clinical Epidemiology at Aarhus University in Denmark, and his colleagues compared diclofenac initiation with beginning other NSAIDs or acetaminophen. Compared with that associated with ibuprofen or acetaminophen, the MACE risk was elevated 20% in diclofenac initiators (95% CI, 1.1–1.3 for both). Initiating diclofenac was associated with 30% greater risk for MACE, compared with initiating naproxen (95% CI, 1.1–1.5).
“Diclofenac is the most frequently used NSAID in low-, middle-, and high-income countries and is available over the counter in most countries; therefore, its cardiovascular risk profile is of major clinical and public health importance,” said Dr. Schmidt and his coauthors.
In all, the study included 1,370,832 individuals who initiated diclofenac, 3,878,454 ibuprofen initiators, 291,490 naproxen initiators, and 764,781 acetaminophen initiators. Those starting diclofenac were compared with those starting other medications and with 1,303,209 individuals who sought health care but did not start one of the medications.
Novel Methodology
The researchers used the longstanding and comprehensive Danish health registry system to their advantage in designing a cohort trial that was modeled to resemble a clinical trial. For each month, beginning in 1996 and continuing through 2016, Dr. Schmidt and his collaborators assembled propensity-matched cohorts of individuals to compare each study group. The study design achieved many of the aims of a clinical trial while working within the ethical constraints of studying medications known to elevate cardiovascular risk.
For each 30-day period, the investigators tracked and compared cardiovascular outcomes for each group. Each month, data for a new cohort were collected, beginning a new “clinical trial.” Individuals could be included in more than one month’s worth of “trial” data as long as they continued to meet inclusion criteria.
The completeness of Danish health data meant that the researchers were confident in data about comorbidities, other prescription medications, and outcomes.
Dr. Schmidt and his colleagues performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses to look at the extent to which preexisting risks for cardiovascular disease mediated MACE risk on diclofenac initiation. They found that diclofenac initiators in the highest risk group had as many as 40 excess cardiovascular events per year—about half of them fatal—that were attributable to starting the medication. Although that group had the highest absolute risk, “the relative risks were highest in those with the lowest baseline risk,” said the investigators.
Secondary outcomes for the study included the association between medication use or non-use and each component of the composite primary outcome. These components included first-time occurrences of the nonfatal end points of atrial fibrillation or flutter, ischemic stroke, heart failure, and myocardial infarction. Cardiac death included death from any cardiac cause.
“Supporting use of a combined end point, event rates consistently increased for all individual outcomes” for diclofenac initiators, compared with those who did not start an NSAID, said Dr. Schmidt and his colleagues.
Individuals were excluded if they had known cardiovascular, kidney, liver, or ulcer disease and if they had malignancy or serious mental health diagnoses such as dementia or schizophrenia. Participants, mean age 48 to 56, had to be at least 18 and could not have filled a prescription for an NSAID within the previous 12 months. Men made up 36.6% to 46.3% of the cohorts.
Dr. Schmidt and his collaborators said that in comparison with other NSAIDs, the short half-life of diclofenac means that a supratherapeutic plasma concentration of diclofenac soon after initiation achieves not just cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), but also COX-1 inhibition. However, after those high levels fall, patients taking diclofenac spend a substantial period of time with unopposed COX-2 inhibition, a prothrombotic state that also is associated with blood pressure elevation, atherogenesis, and worsening of heart failure.
Diclofenac and ibuprofen entailed similar gastrointestinal bleeding risks, and both medications were associated with a higher risk of bleeding than were ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and no medication.
Public Health Implications
“Comparing diclofenac initiation with no NSAID initiation, the consistency between our results and those of previous meta-analyses of both trial and observational data provides strong evidence to guide clinical decision making,” said Dr. Schmidt and his coauthors.
“Considering its cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks, however, there is little justification to initiate diclofenac treatment before other traditional NSAIDs,” noted the investigators. “It is time to acknowledge the potential health risk of diclofenac and to reduce its use.”
The study was funded by the Department of Clinical Epidemiology Research Foundation, University of Aarhus, and by the Program for Clinical Research Infrastructure, funded by the Lundbeck Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation, and the Danish Research Council. The authors reported that they had no relevant conflicts of interest.
—Kari Oakes
Suggested Reading
Schmidt M, Sørensen HT, Pedersen L. Diclofenac use and cardiovascular risks: series of nationwide cohort studies. BMJ. 2018;362:k3426.
For expert commentary on this article, please visit our Migraine Resource Center online at https://www.mdedge.com/neurologyreviews/migraineresourcecenter/article/177937/headache-migraine/physician-commentary
Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was increased by 50%, compared with no therapy.
Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was increased by 50%, compared with no therapy.
In the largest analysis ever of cardiovascular risk associated with the initiation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), diclofenac was associated with higher risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The study findings were published online September 4 in BMJ.
Those beginning diclofenac had a 50% increased 30-day risk for a composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), compared with individuals who did not initiate an NSAID or acetaminophen (95% confidence interval for incidence rate ratio, 1.4–1.7).
The risk was still significantly elevated when the study’s first author, Morten Schmidt, MD, PhD, of the Department of Clinical Epidemiology at Aarhus University in Denmark, and his colleagues compared diclofenac initiation with beginning other NSAIDs or acetaminophen. Compared with that associated with ibuprofen or acetaminophen, the MACE risk was elevated 20% in diclofenac initiators (95% CI, 1.1–1.3 for both). Initiating diclofenac was associated with 30% greater risk for MACE, compared with initiating naproxen (95% CI, 1.1–1.5).
“Diclofenac is the most frequently used NSAID in low-, middle-, and high-income countries and is available over the counter in most countries; therefore, its cardiovascular risk profile is of major clinical and public health importance,” said Dr. Schmidt and his coauthors.
In all, the study included 1,370,832 individuals who initiated diclofenac, 3,878,454 ibuprofen initiators, 291,490 naproxen initiators, and 764,781 acetaminophen initiators. Those starting diclofenac were compared with those starting other medications and with 1,303,209 individuals who sought health care but did not start one of the medications.
Novel Methodology
The researchers used the longstanding and comprehensive Danish health registry system to their advantage in designing a cohort trial that was modeled to resemble a clinical trial. For each month, beginning in 1996 and continuing through 2016, Dr. Schmidt and his collaborators assembled propensity-matched cohorts of individuals to compare each study group. The study design achieved many of the aims of a clinical trial while working within the ethical constraints of studying medications known to elevate cardiovascular risk.
For each 30-day period, the investigators tracked and compared cardiovascular outcomes for each group. Each month, data for a new cohort were collected, beginning a new “clinical trial.” Individuals could be included in more than one month’s worth of “trial” data as long as they continued to meet inclusion criteria.
The completeness of Danish health data meant that the researchers were confident in data about comorbidities, other prescription medications, and outcomes.
Dr. Schmidt and his colleagues performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses to look at the extent to which preexisting risks for cardiovascular disease mediated MACE risk on diclofenac initiation. They found that diclofenac initiators in the highest risk group had as many as 40 excess cardiovascular events per year—about half of them fatal—that were attributable to starting the medication. Although that group had the highest absolute risk, “the relative risks were highest in those with the lowest baseline risk,” said the investigators.
Secondary outcomes for the study included the association between medication use or non-use and each component of the composite primary outcome. These components included first-time occurrences of the nonfatal end points of atrial fibrillation or flutter, ischemic stroke, heart failure, and myocardial infarction. Cardiac death included death from any cardiac cause.
“Supporting use of a combined end point, event rates consistently increased for all individual outcomes” for diclofenac initiators, compared with those who did not start an NSAID, said Dr. Schmidt and his colleagues.
Individuals were excluded if they had known cardiovascular, kidney, liver, or ulcer disease and if they had malignancy or serious mental health diagnoses such as dementia or schizophrenia. Participants, mean age 48 to 56, had to be at least 18 and could not have filled a prescription for an NSAID within the previous 12 months. Men made up 36.6% to 46.3% of the cohorts.
Dr. Schmidt and his collaborators said that in comparison with other NSAIDs, the short half-life of diclofenac means that a supratherapeutic plasma concentration of diclofenac soon after initiation achieves not just cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), but also COX-1 inhibition. However, after those high levels fall, patients taking diclofenac spend a substantial period of time with unopposed COX-2 inhibition, a prothrombotic state that also is associated with blood pressure elevation, atherogenesis, and worsening of heart failure.
Diclofenac and ibuprofen entailed similar gastrointestinal bleeding risks, and both medications were associated with a higher risk of bleeding than were ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and no medication.
Public Health Implications
“Comparing diclofenac initiation with no NSAID initiation, the consistency between our results and those of previous meta-analyses of both trial and observational data provides strong evidence to guide clinical decision making,” said Dr. Schmidt and his coauthors.
“Considering its cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks, however, there is little justification to initiate diclofenac treatment before other traditional NSAIDs,” noted the investigators. “It is time to acknowledge the potential health risk of diclofenac and to reduce its use.”
The study was funded by the Department of Clinical Epidemiology Research Foundation, University of Aarhus, and by the Program for Clinical Research Infrastructure, funded by the Lundbeck Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation, and the Danish Research Council. The authors reported that they had no relevant conflicts of interest.
—Kari Oakes
Suggested Reading
Schmidt M, Sørensen HT, Pedersen L. Diclofenac use and cardiovascular risks: series of nationwide cohort studies. BMJ. 2018;362:k3426.
For expert commentary on this article, please visit our Migraine Resource Center online at https://www.mdedge.com/neurologyreviews/migraineresourcecenter/article/177937/headache-migraine/physician-commentary
In the largest analysis ever of cardiovascular risk associated with the initiation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), diclofenac was associated with higher risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The study findings were published online September 4 in BMJ.
Those beginning diclofenac had a 50% increased 30-day risk for a composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), compared with individuals who did not initiate an NSAID or acetaminophen (95% confidence interval for incidence rate ratio, 1.4–1.7).
The risk was still significantly elevated when the study’s first author, Morten Schmidt, MD, PhD, of the Department of Clinical Epidemiology at Aarhus University in Denmark, and his colleagues compared diclofenac initiation with beginning other NSAIDs or acetaminophen. Compared with that associated with ibuprofen or acetaminophen, the MACE risk was elevated 20% in diclofenac initiators (95% CI, 1.1–1.3 for both). Initiating diclofenac was associated with 30% greater risk for MACE, compared with initiating naproxen (95% CI, 1.1–1.5).
“Diclofenac is the most frequently used NSAID in low-, middle-, and high-income countries and is available over the counter in most countries; therefore, its cardiovascular risk profile is of major clinical and public health importance,” said Dr. Schmidt and his coauthors.
In all, the study included 1,370,832 individuals who initiated diclofenac, 3,878,454 ibuprofen initiators, 291,490 naproxen initiators, and 764,781 acetaminophen initiators. Those starting diclofenac were compared with those starting other medications and with 1,303,209 individuals who sought health care but did not start one of the medications.
Novel Methodology
The researchers used the longstanding and comprehensive Danish health registry system to their advantage in designing a cohort trial that was modeled to resemble a clinical trial. For each month, beginning in 1996 and continuing through 2016, Dr. Schmidt and his collaborators assembled propensity-matched cohorts of individuals to compare each study group. The study design achieved many of the aims of a clinical trial while working within the ethical constraints of studying medications known to elevate cardiovascular risk.
For each 30-day period, the investigators tracked and compared cardiovascular outcomes for each group. Each month, data for a new cohort were collected, beginning a new “clinical trial.” Individuals could be included in more than one month’s worth of “trial” data as long as they continued to meet inclusion criteria.
The completeness of Danish health data meant that the researchers were confident in data about comorbidities, other prescription medications, and outcomes.
Dr. Schmidt and his colleagues performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses to look at the extent to which preexisting risks for cardiovascular disease mediated MACE risk on diclofenac initiation. They found that diclofenac initiators in the highest risk group had as many as 40 excess cardiovascular events per year—about half of them fatal—that were attributable to starting the medication. Although that group had the highest absolute risk, “the relative risks were highest in those with the lowest baseline risk,” said the investigators.
Secondary outcomes for the study included the association between medication use or non-use and each component of the composite primary outcome. These components included first-time occurrences of the nonfatal end points of atrial fibrillation or flutter, ischemic stroke, heart failure, and myocardial infarction. Cardiac death included death from any cardiac cause.
“Supporting use of a combined end point, event rates consistently increased for all individual outcomes” for diclofenac initiators, compared with those who did not start an NSAID, said Dr. Schmidt and his colleagues.
Individuals were excluded if they had known cardiovascular, kidney, liver, or ulcer disease and if they had malignancy or serious mental health diagnoses such as dementia or schizophrenia. Participants, mean age 48 to 56, had to be at least 18 and could not have filled a prescription for an NSAID within the previous 12 months. Men made up 36.6% to 46.3% of the cohorts.
Dr. Schmidt and his collaborators said that in comparison with other NSAIDs, the short half-life of diclofenac means that a supratherapeutic plasma concentration of diclofenac soon after initiation achieves not just cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), but also COX-1 inhibition. However, after those high levels fall, patients taking diclofenac spend a substantial period of time with unopposed COX-2 inhibition, a prothrombotic state that also is associated with blood pressure elevation, atherogenesis, and worsening of heart failure.
Diclofenac and ibuprofen entailed similar gastrointestinal bleeding risks, and both medications were associated with a higher risk of bleeding than were ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and no medication.
Public Health Implications
“Comparing diclofenac initiation with no NSAID initiation, the consistency between our results and those of previous meta-analyses of both trial and observational data provides strong evidence to guide clinical decision making,” said Dr. Schmidt and his coauthors.
“Considering its cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks, however, there is little justification to initiate diclofenac treatment before other traditional NSAIDs,” noted the investigators. “It is time to acknowledge the potential health risk of diclofenac and to reduce its use.”
The study was funded by the Department of Clinical Epidemiology Research Foundation, University of Aarhus, and by the Program for Clinical Research Infrastructure, funded by the Lundbeck Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation, and the Danish Research Council. The authors reported that they had no relevant conflicts of interest.
—Kari Oakes
Suggested Reading
Schmidt M, Sørensen HT, Pedersen L. Diclofenac use and cardiovascular risks: series of nationwide cohort studies. BMJ. 2018;362:k3426.
For expert commentary on this article, please visit our Migraine Resource Center online at https://www.mdedge.com/neurologyreviews/migraineresourcecenter/article/177937/headache-migraine/physician-commentary
Study: Problems persist with APMs
Physicians continue to support advanced alternative payment models despite the fact that operational issues have not improved over the last 4 years and new ones have cropped up, according to a follow-up survey conducted by the RAND Corporation for the American Medical Association.
“All the things we heard in 2014 were still present in 2018. Both the challenges that practices had experienced back in 2014 having to do with data timeliness, data completeness and accuracy, payment model execution, all those challenges persisted,” Mark W. Friedberg, MD, senior physician policy researcher at RAND, said in an interview.
RAND surveyed 31 practices of varying practice size and specialty across six geographic regions, some of which participated in the 2014 survey. Supplemental information was provided by interviews with 32 market observers, 8 health plan leaders, 10 hospital and hospital system leaders, 10 state and local medical society leaders, and 4 chapter leaders with MGMA (formerly the Medical Group Management Association).
“We had thought we would hear that the problem had gotten a little bit better since there has been some investment in trying to tamp down the wide range of measures that are involved in these alternative payment models,” Dr. Friedberg said. “We did not see any evidence of that having any effect on the practices that participated in this study this time around.”
Indeed, concerns reported in 2014 were again reported in 2018, along with a new set of concerns, including the perceived pace of change in alternative payment models (APMs), the complexity of APMs, and physician concerns over two-sided risk models.
“Practices, especially those that participated both times, said in 2014 we had these challenges [of rapid changes in APM models] and since then, things have just gotten a lot faster,” he said, noting that doctors are complaining of models that are going through changes, sometimes without much warning. “They are changing quite rapidly from year to year. If you look at the MACRA QPP [Quality Payment Program] for example, that model changes every year to some extent and those things are hard for them to keep up with.”
Running hand in hand with the change is the complexity of the changes, a result of expanding performance measures and uncertainty with thresholds for penalties and rewards and in some ways has had little impact on improving care.
Dr. Friedberg noted that some practices are hiring people to examine APMs to devise strategic ways to choose and report data for maximum return.
“In a practice, for example, if their quality of care was already very good, what these folks ended up doing was help them choose measures and work the attribution algorithms in a strategic way to either guarantee a bonus or minimize the risk of incurring a penalty,” he said.
He also noted that practices appear to becoming more risk averse.
“We heard a lot more of the following thing, which is that if [practices] were in a two-sided risk model, several of them reported trying and succeeding in some cases offloading the downside risk to partners,” Dr. Friedberg reported. “And what this resulted in was that the practice, even though from the payer’s perspective they are in a two-sided model, the practice was actually in a one-sided model with a partner who is taking all of the downside risk and a portion of the upside risk, leaving a small upside risk proposition that remained for the practice.”
He said the range of partners that were absorbing the downside risk included hospitals, device manufacturers, consulting companies, or private equity firms.
Despite the concerns surrounding APMs, Dr. Friedberg said that “we did not hear practices broadly saying that they just weren’t interested in alternative payment models. In general, practices still remained pretty enthusiastic about these alternative payment models in theory. If they could be made simpler, if the pace of change weren’t quite so fast, that they would have a chance to really do some important care improvements in alternative payment models.”
He noted some of the surveyed practices were able to make investments in care as a direct result of participating in APMs, such as in behavioral health capabilities in primary care, for example, leading to quality of care improvements.
However, these issues could reveal a future unwillingness to participate in APMs, especially two-sided risk models, something at least the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services are pushing for as a stated goal of the QPP is to get practices to participate in APMs and take on more risk.
The growing aversion to taking on downside risk could lead practices to simply stay in fee for service and simply take the payment penalty because it is a fixed amount that can be planned for, as opposed to the fluctuations of bonuses and penalties that comes with a rapidly changing APM environment, Dr. Friedberg said.
Going forward, the report makes a number of recommendations to help create an environment that would potentially make APMs more successful, including simplifying the models; creating stable, predictable, and moderately paced pathways to APM participation; making data available in a more timely fashion; minimizing downside risk or helping practices better manage it; and designing APMs that will encourage clinical changes to help improve the effectiveness of care delivered.
Physicians continue to support advanced alternative payment models despite the fact that operational issues have not improved over the last 4 years and new ones have cropped up, according to a follow-up survey conducted by the RAND Corporation for the American Medical Association.
“All the things we heard in 2014 were still present in 2018. Both the challenges that practices had experienced back in 2014 having to do with data timeliness, data completeness and accuracy, payment model execution, all those challenges persisted,” Mark W. Friedberg, MD, senior physician policy researcher at RAND, said in an interview.
RAND surveyed 31 practices of varying practice size and specialty across six geographic regions, some of which participated in the 2014 survey. Supplemental information was provided by interviews with 32 market observers, 8 health plan leaders, 10 hospital and hospital system leaders, 10 state and local medical society leaders, and 4 chapter leaders with MGMA (formerly the Medical Group Management Association).
“We had thought we would hear that the problem had gotten a little bit better since there has been some investment in trying to tamp down the wide range of measures that are involved in these alternative payment models,” Dr. Friedberg said. “We did not see any evidence of that having any effect on the practices that participated in this study this time around.”
Indeed, concerns reported in 2014 were again reported in 2018, along with a new set of concerns, including the perceived pace of change in alternative payment models (APMs), the complexity of APMs, and physician concerns over two-sided risk models.
“Practices, especially those that participated both times, said in 2014 we had these challenges [of rapid changes in APM models] and since then, things have just gotten a lot faster,” he said, noting that doctors are complaining of models that are going through changes, sometimes without much warning. “They are changing quite rapidly from year to year. If you look at the MACRA QPP [Quality Payment Program] for example, that model changes every year to some extent and those things are hard for them to keep up with.”
Running hand in hand with the change is the complexity of the changes, a result of expanding performance measures and uncertainty with thresholds for penalties and rewards and in some ways has had little impact on improving care.
Dr. Friedberg noted that some practices are hiring people to examine APMs to devise strategic ways to choose and report data for maximum return.
“In a practice, for example, if their quality of care was already very good, what these folks ended up doing was help them choose measures and work the attribution algorithms in a strategic way to either guarantee a bonus or minimize the risk of incurring a penalty,” he said.
He also noted that practices appear to becoming more risk averse.
“We heard a lot more of the following thing, which is that if [practices] were in a two-sided risk model, several of them reported trying and succeeding in some cases offloading the downside risk to partners,” Dr. Friedberg reported. “And what this resulted in was that the practice, even though from the payer’s perspective they are in a two-sided model, the practice was actually in a one-sided model with a partner who is taking all of the downside risk and a portion of the upside risk, leaving a small upside risk proposition that remained for the practice.”
He said the range of partners that were absorbing the downside risk included hospitals, device manufacturers, consulting companies, or private equity firms.
Despite the concerns surrounding APMs, Dr. Friedberg said that “we did not hear practices broadly saying that they just weren’t interested in alternative payment models. In general, practices still remained pretty enthusiastic about these alternative payment models in theory. If they could be made simpler, if the pace of change weren’t quite so fast, that they would have a chance to really do some important care improvements in alternative payment models.”
He noted some of the surveyed practices were able to make investments in care as a direct result of participating in APMs, such as in behavioral health capabilities in primary care, for example, leading to quality of care improvements.
However, these issues could reveal a future unwillingness to participate in APMs, especially two-sided risk models, something at least the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services are pushing for as a stated goal of the QPP is to get practices to participate in APMs and take on more risk.
The growing aversion to taking on downside risk could lead practices to simply stay in fee for service and simply take the payment penalty because it is a fixed amount that can be planned for, as opposed to the fluctuations of bonuses and penalties that comes with a rapidly changing APM environment, Dr. Friedberg said.
Going forward, the report makes a number of recommendations to help create an environment that would potentially make APMs more successful, including simplifying the models; creating stable, predictable, and moderately paced pathways to APM participation; making data available in a more timely fashion; minimizing downside risk or helping practices better manage it; and designing APMs that will encourage clinical changes to help improve the effectiveness of care delivered.
Physicians continue to support advanced alternative payment models despite the fact that operational issues have not improved over the last 4 years and new ones have cropped up, according to a follow-up survey conducted by the RAND Corporation for the American Medical Association.
“All the things we heard in 2014 were still present in 2018. Both the challenges that practices had experienced back in 2014 having to do with data timeliness, data completeness and accuracy, payment model execution, all those challenges persisted,” Mark W. Friedberg, MD, senior physician policy researcher at RAND, said in an interview.
RAND surveyed 31 practices of varying practice size and specialty across six geographic regions, some of which participated in the 2014 survey. Supplemental information was provided by interviews with 32 market observers, 8 health plan leaders, 10 hospital and hospital system leaders, 10 state and local medical society leaders, and 4 chapter leaders with MGMA (formerly the Medical Group Management Association).
“We had thought we would hear that the problem had gotten a little bit better since there has been some investment in trying to tamp down the wide range of measures that are involved in these alternative payment models,” Dr. Friedberg said. “We did not see any evidence of that having any effect on the practices that participated in this study this time around.”
Indeed, concerns reported in 2014 were again reported in 2018, along with a new set of concerns, including the perceived pace of change in alternative payment models (APMs), the complexity of APMs, and physician concerns over two-sided risk models.
“Practices, especially those that participated both times, said in 2014 we had these challenges [of rapid changes in APM models] and since then, things have just gotten a lot faster,” he said, noting that doctors are complaining of models that are going through changes, sometimes without much warning. “They are changing quite rapidly from year to year. If you look at the MACRA QPP [Quality Payment Program] for example, that model changes every year to some extent and those things are hard for them to keep up with.”
Running hand in hand with the change is the complexity of the changes, a result of expanding performance measures and uncertainty with thresholds for penalties and rewards and in some ways has had little impact on improving care.
Dr. Friedberg noted that some practices are hiring people to examine APMs to devise strategic ways to choose and report data for maximum return.
“In a practice, for example, if their quality of care was already very good, what these folks ended up doing was help them choose measures and work the attribution algorithms in a strategic way to either guarantee a bonus or minimize the risk of incurring a penalty,” he said.
He also noted that practices appear to becoming more risk averse.
“We heard a lot more of the following thing, which is that if [practices] were in a two-sided risk model, several of them reported trying and succeeding in some cases offloading the downside risk to partners,” Dr. Friedberg reported. “And what this resulted in was that the practice, even though from the payer’s perspective they are in a two-sided model, the practice was actually in a one-sided model with a partner who is taking all of the downside risk and a portion of the upside risk, leaving a small upside risk proposition that remained for the practice.”
He said the range of partners that were absorbing the downside risk included hospitals, device manufacturers, consulting companies, or private equity firms.
Despite the concerns surrounding APMs, Dr. Friedberg said that “we did not hear practices broadly saying that they just weren’t interested in alternative payment models. In general, practices still remained pretty enthusiastic about these alternative payment models in theory. If they could be made simpler, if the pace of change weren’t quite so fast, that they would have a chance to really do some important care improvements in alternative payment models.”
He noted some of the surveyed practices were able to make investments in care as a direct result of participating in APMs, such as in behavioral health capabilities in primary care, for example, leading to quality of care improvements.
However, these issues could reveal a future unwillingness to participate in APMs, especially two-sided risk models, something at least the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services are pushing for as a stated goal of the QPP is to get practices to participate in APMs and take on more risk.
The growing aversion to taking on downside risk could lead practices to simply stay in fee for service and simply take the payment penalty because it is a fixed amount that can be planned for, as opposed to the fluctuations of bonuses and penalties that comes with a rapidly changing APM environment, Dr. Friedberg said.
Going forward, the report makes a number of recommendations to help create an environment that would potentially make APMs more successful, including simplifying the models; creating stable, predictable, and moderately paced pathways to APM participation; making data available in a more timely fashion; minimizing downside risk or helping practices better manage it; and designing APMs that will encourage clinical changes to help improve the effectiveness of care delivered.
New MS Subtype Shows Absence of Cerebral White Matter Demyelination
A new subtype of multiple sclerosis (MS) called myelocortical MS is characterized by demyelination only in the spinal cord and cerebral cortex and not in the cerebral white matter, according to a study published online ahead of print August 21 in Lancet Neurology. The findings are based on an examination of the brains and spinal cords of 100 patients who died of MS.
Bruce D. Trapp, PhD, the Morris R. and Ruth V. Graham Endowed Chair in Biomedical Research at the Lerner Research Institute at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, and his coauthors said that while the demyelination of cerebral white matter is a pathologic hallmark of MS, previous research has found that only around half of cerebral T2-weighted hyperintense white matter lesions are demyelinated, and these lesions account for less than a third of variance in the rate of brain atrophy.
“In the absence of specific MRI metrics for demyelination, the relationship between cerebral white-matter demyelination and neurodegeneration remains speculative,” they said.
In this study, researchers scanned the brains with MRI before autopsy, then took centimeter-thick hemispheric slices to study the white-matter lesions. They identified 12 individuals as having what they describe as myelocortical MS, characterized by the absence of areas of cerebral white-matter discoloration indicative of demyelinated lesions.
The authors then compared these individuals with 12 individuals with typical MS matched by age, sex, MRI protocol, MS disease subtype, disease duration, and Expanded Disability Status Scale score.
Not Typical MS
They found that while individuals with myelocortical MS did not have demyelinated lesions in the cerebral white matter, they had areas of demyelinated lesions in the cerebral cortex similar to those of individuals with typical MS (median 4.45% vs 9.74%, respectively). However, the individuals with myelocortical MS had a significantly smaller area of spinal cord demyelination (median 3.81% vs 13.81%).
Individuals with myelocortical MS also had significantly lower mean cortical neuronal densities, compared with healthy control brains, in layer III, layer V, and layer VI. But individuals with typical MS only had a lower cortical neuronal density in layer V when compared with controls.
Dr. Trapp and colleagues also saw that in typical MS, neuronal density decreased as the area of brain white-matter demyelination increased. However, this negative linear correlation was not seen in myelocortical MS.
On MRI, researchers were still able to see abnormalities in the cerebral white matter in individuals with myelocortical MS, in T2-weighted, T1-weighted, and magnetization transfer ratios (MTR) images. They also found similar total T2-weighted and T1-weighted lesion volumes in individuals with myelocortical MS and those with typical MS, although individuals with typical MS had significantly greater MTR lesion volumes.
The Hallmarks of Myelocortical MS
“We propose that myelocortical MS is characterized by spinal cord demyelination, subpial cortical demyelination, and an absence of cerebral white-matter demyelination,” Dr. Trapp and colleagues wrote. “Our findings indicate that abnormal cerebral white-matter T2-T1-MTR regions of interest are not always demyelinated, and this pathologic evidence suggests that cerebral white-matter demyelination and cortical neuronal degeneration can be independent events in myelocortical MS.”
The authors acknowledged that one limitation of their study may have been selection bias, as all the patients in the study died from complications of advanced MS. They suggested that it was therefore not appropriate to conclude that the prevalence of myelocortical MS seen in their sample would be similar across the entire MS population, nor were the findings likely to apply to pateints with earlier stage disease.
The study received funding from the NIH and the National MS Society. One author is an employee of Renovo Neural, and three authors are employees of Biogen. One author declared a pending patent related to automated lesion segmentation from MRI images, and four authors declared funding, fees, and nonfinancial support from pharmaceutical companies.
—Bianca Nogrady
Suggested Reading
Trapp BD, Vignos M, Dudman J, et al. Cortical neuronal densities and cerebral white matter demyelination in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Aug 21 [Epub ahead of print].
A new subtype of multiple sclerosis (MS) called myelocortical MS is characterized by demyelination only in the spinal cord and cerebral cortex and not in the cerebral white matter, according to a study published online ahead of print August 21 in Lancet Neurology. The findings are based on an examination of the brains and spinal cords of 100 patients who died of MS.
Bruce D. Trapp, PhD, the Morris R. and Ruth V. Graham Endowed Chair in Biomedical Research at the Lerner Research Institute at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, and his coauthors said that while the demyelination of cerebral white matter is a pathologic hallmark of MS, previous research has found that only around half of cerebral T2-weighted hyperintense white matter lesions are demyelinated, and these lesions account for less than a third of variance in the rate of brain atrophy.
“In the absence of specific MRI metrics for demyelination, the relationship between cerebral white-matter demyelination and neurodegeneration remains speculative,” they said.
In this study, researchers scanned the brains with MRI before autopsy, then took centimeter-thick hemispheric slices to study the white-matter lesions. They identified 12 individuals as having what they describe as myelocortical MS, characterized by the absence of areas of cerebral white-matter discoloration indicative of demyelinated lesions.
The authors then compared these individuals with 12 individuals with typical MS matched by age, sex, MRI protocol, MS disease subtype, disease duration, and Expanded Disability Status Scale score.
Not Typical MS
They found that while individuals with myelocortical MS did not have demyelinated lesions in the cerebral white matter, they had areas of demyelinated lesions in the cerebral cortex similar to those of individuals with typical MS (median 4.45% vs 9.74%, respectively). However, the individuals with myelocortical MS had a significantly smaller area of spinal cord demyelination (median 3.81% vs 13.81%).
Individuals with myelocortical MS also had significantly lower mean cortical neuronal densities, compared with healthy control brains, in layer III, layer V, and layer VI. But individuals with typical MS only had a lower cortical neuronal density in layer V when compared with controls.
Dr. Trapp and colleagues also saw that in typical MS, neuronal density decreased as the area of brain white-matter demyelination increased. However, this negative linear correlation was not seen in myelocortical MS.
On MRI, researchers were still able to see abnormalities in the cerebral white matter in individuals with myelocortical MS, in T2-weighted, T1-weighted, and magnetization transfer ratios (MTR) images. They also found similar total T2-weighted and T1-weighted lesion volumes in individuals with myelocortical MS and those with typical MS, although individuals with typical MS had significantly greater MTR lesion volumes.
The Hallmarks of Myelocortical MS
“We propose that myelocortical MS is characterized by spinal cord demyelination, subpial cortical demyelination, and an absence of cerebral white-matter demyelination,” Dr. Trapp and colleagues wrote. “Our findings indicate that abnormal cerebral white-matter T2-T1-MTR regions of interest are not always demyelinated, and this pathologic evidence suggests that cerebral white-matter demyelination and cortical neuronal degeneration can be independent events in myelocortical MS.”
The authors acknowledged that one limitation of their study may have been selection bias, as all the patients in the study died from complications of advanced MS. They suggested that it was therefore not appropriate to conclude that the prevalence of myelocortical MS seen in their sample would be similar across the entire MS population, nor were the findings likely to apply to pateints with earlier stage disease.
The study received funding from the NIH and the National MS Society. One author is an employee of Renovo Neural, and three authors are employees of Biogen. One author declared a pending patent related to automated lesion segmentation from MRI images, and four authors declared funding, fees, and nonfinancial support from pharmaceutical companies.
—Bianca Nogrady
Suggested Reading
Trapp BD, Vignos M, Dudman J, et al. Cortical neuronal densities and cerebral white matter demyelination in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Aug 21 [Epub ahead of print].
A new subtype of multiple sclerosis (MS) called myelocortical MS is characterized by demyelination only in the spinal cord and cerebral cortex and not in the cerebral white matter, according to a study published online ahead of print August 21 in Lancet Neurology. The findings are based on an examination of the brains and spinal cords of 100 patients who died of MS.
Bruce D. Trapp, PhD, the Morris R. and Ruth V. Graham Endowed Chair in Biomedical Research at the Lerner Research Institute at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, and his coauthors said that while the demyelination of cerebral white matter is a pathologic hallmark of MS, previous research has found that only around half of cerebral T2-weighted hyperintense white matter lesions are demyelinated, and these lesions account for less than a third of variance in the rate of brain atrophy.
“In the absence of specific MRI metrics for demyelination, the relationship between cerebral white-matter demyelination and neurodegeneration remains speculative,” they said.
In this study, researchers scanned the brains with MRI before autopsy, then took centimeter-thick hemispheric slices to study the white-matter lesions. They identified 12 individuals as having what they describe as myelocortical MS, characterized by the absence of areas of cerebral white-matter discoloration indicative of demyelinated lesions.
The authors then compared these individuals with 12 individuals with typical MS matched by age, sex, MRI protocol, MS disease subtype, disease duration, and Expanded Disability Status Scale score.
Not Typical MS
They found that while individuals with myelocortical MS did not have demyelinated lesions in the cerebral white matter, they had areas of demyelinated lesions in the cerebral cortex similar to those of individuals with typical MS (median 4.45% vs 9.74%, respectively). However, the individuals with myelocortical MS had a significantly smaller area of spinal cord demyelination (median 3.81% vs 13.81%).
Individuals with myelocortical MS also had significantly lower mean cortical neuronal densities, compared with healthy control brains, in layer III, layer V, and layer VI. But individuals with typical MS only had a lower cortical neuronal density in layer V when compared with controls.
Dr. Trapp and colleagues also saw that in typical MS, neuronal density decreased as the area of brain white-matter demyelination increased. However, this negative linear correlation was not seen in myelocortical MS.
On MRI, researchers were still able to see abnormalities in the cerebral white matter in individuals with myelocortical MS, in T2-weighted, T1-weighted, and magnetization transfer ratios (MTR) images. They also found similar total T2-weighted and T1-weighted lesion volumes in individuals with myelocortical MS and those with typical MS, although individuals with typical MS had significantly greater MTR lesion volumes.
The Hallmarks of Myelocortical MS
“We propose that myelocortical MS is characterized by spinal cord demyelination, subpial cortical demyelination, and an absence of cerebral white-matter demyelination,” Dr. Trapp and colleagues wrote. “Our findings indicate that abnormal cerebral white-matter T2-T1-MTR regions of interest are not always demyelinated, and this pathologic evidence suggests that cerebral white-matter demyelination and cortical neuronal degeneration can be independent events in myelocortical MS.”
The authors acknowledged that one limitation of their study may have been selection bias, as all the patients in the study died from complications of advanced MS. They suggested that it was therefore not appropriate to conclude that the prevalence of myelocortical MS seen in their sample would be similar across the entire MS population, nor were the findings likely to apply to pateints with earlier stage disease.
The study received funding from the NIH and the National MS Society. One author is an employee of Renovo Neural, and three authors are employees of Biogen. One author declared a pending patent related to automated lesion segmentation from MRI images, and four authors declared funding, fees, and nonfinancial support from pharmaceutical companies.
—Bianca Nogrady
Suggested Reading
Trapp BD, Vignos M, Dudman J, et al. Cortical neuronal densities and cerebral white matter demyelination in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Aug 21 [Epub ahead of print].
Cardiovascular Health and Cognitive Decline: What Is the Connection?
Maintaining cardiovascular health may reduce white matter hyperintensities and decrease the risk of dementia.
Optimal measures of cardiovascular health are associated with brain health in adults, according to two studies published in the August 21 issue of JAMA.
In a French population-based cohort study, adults ages 65 and older with more cardiovascular health measures at ideal levels had a lower risk of dementia and lower rates of cognitive decline than did those with fewer optimal cardiovascular measures, such as blood pressure and physical activity.
In addition, a preliminary, cross-sectional study of younger adults found that the number of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors at recommended levels was associated with brain vessel structure and function and the number of white matter hyperintensities.
“These two studies convey an immediately actionable message to clinicians, policy makers, and patients,” said Jeffrey L. Saver, MD, and Mary Cushman, MD, in an accompanying editorial. “Available evidence indicates that to achieve a lifetime of robust brain health free of dementia, it is never too early or too late to strive for attainment of ideal cardiovascular health.” Dr. Saver is a Professor of Neurology and Director of the Stroke Center at the University of California, Los Angeles. Dr. Cushman is a Professor of Medicine and Pathology at Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont in Burlington.
Cardiovascular Health in Older Age
Vascular dementia is the second most common neuropathologic basis of dementia, after Alzheimer’s disease, and “most cases of dementia arise from a combination of [Alzheimer’s disease] and cerebrovascular pathology,” the editorialists noted. Studies have suggested a connection between cardiovascular health and dementia, but the evidence is limited.
Cécilia Samieri, PhD, a Senior Researcher at the Bordeaux Population Health Research Center at the Université de Bordeaux in France, and colleagues studied people age 65 and older from Bordeaux, Dijon, and Montpellier, France, to examine the association between cardiovascular health level and risk of dementia and cognitive decline in older adults.
The study included 6,626 people without a history of cardiovascular disease or dementia at baseline. Participants underwent in-person neuropsychologic testing between January 1999 and July 2016 and systematic detection of incident dementia. Participants had a mean age of 73.7, and 63.4% were women.
The investigators defined cardiovascular health using a seven-item tool from the American Heart Association (AHA). They determined the number of the AHA’s Life’s Simple Seven metrics that were at recommended levels (ie, nonsmoking, BMI < 25, regular physical activity, eating fish at least twice per week and fruits and vegetables at least three times per day, cholesterol < 200 mg/dL [untreated], fasting glucose < 100 mg/dL [untreated], and blood pressure < 120/80 mm Hg [untreated]).
Approximately 36.5% of the cohort had zero, one, or two optimal health metrics, 57.1% had three or four optimal health metrics, and 6.5% had five, six, or seven optimal health metrics.
During an average follow-up of 8.5 years, 745 participants developed dementia. Among participants with zero or one health metrics at optimal levels at baseline, the incidence rate of dementia was 1.76 per 100 person-years. Compared with this rate, the incidence rate per 100 person-years was 0.26 lower for participants with two optimal health metrics, 0.59 lower for participants with three optimal health metrics, 0.43 lower for participants with four optimal health metrics, 0.93 lower for participants with five optimal health metrics, and 0.96 lower for participants with six or seven optimal health metrics.
“In multivariable models, the hazard ratios for dementia were 0.90 per additional optimal metric,” the investigators said. “The study results support the recent recommendations of the AHA and the American Stroke Association for the promotion of the Life’s Simple Seven tool.”
Cerebrovascular Structure and Function in Young Adults
Wilby Williamson, BMBS
The researchers assessed patients’ cerebral vessel density, caliber, and tortuosity and brain white matter hyperintensity lesion count. In a subgroup of 52 participants, they assessed cerebral blood flow.
The researchers determined for each participant how many of eight modifiable risk factors were at recommended levels (ie, BMI < 25, highest tertile of cardiovascular fitness or physical activity, alcohol consumption < eight drinks per week, nonsmoker for more than six months, blood pressure on awake ambulatory monitoring < 130/80 mm Hg, a nonhypertensive diastolic response to exercise [ie, peak diastolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg], total cholesterol < 200 mg/dL, and fasting glucose < 100 mg/dL).
On average, participants had six of the eight modifiable cardiovascular risk factors at recommended levels.
In multivariable models, cardiovascular risk factors were associated with cerebrovascular structure and the number of white matter hyperintensities. “For each additional modifiable risk factor categorized as healthy, vessel density was greater by 0.3 vessels/cm3, vessel caliber was greater by 8 μm, and white matter hyperintensity lesions were fewer by 1.6 lesions. Among the 52 participants with available data, cerebral blood flow varied with vessel density and was 2.5 mL/100 g/min higher for each healthier category of a modifiable risk factor,” Dr. Williamson and colleagues said.
The findings suggest that “some individuals may be starting to diverge to different risk trajectories for brain vascular health in early adulthood,” the researchers said. The study was exploratory, however, and follow-up studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings, they said.
“The magnitude of changes was generally much less than would be expected to produce clinical symptoms such as cognitive impairment or gait difficulty,” said Drs. Saver and Cushman. The changes, however, “may portend more substantial abnormalities later in life,” they said. “Even during the late-life period, when septuagenarians become octogenarians, cardiovascular health is associated with substantial differences in cognitive trajectory and dementia onset.”
—Jake Remaly
Suggested Reading
Samieri C, Perier MC, Gaye B, et al. Association of cardiovascular health level in older age with cognitive decline and incident dementia. JAMA. 2018;320(7):657-664.
Saver JL, Cushman M. Striving for ideal cardiovascular and brain health: It is never too early or too late. JAMA. 2018; 320(7):645-647.
Williamson W, Lewandowski AJ, Forkert ND, et al. Association of cardiovascular risk factors with MRI indices of cerebrovascular structure and function and white matter hyperintensities in young adults. JAMA. 2018;320(7):665-673.
Maintaining cardiovascular health may reduce white matter hyperintensities and decrease the risk of dementia.
Maintaining cardiovascular health may reduce white matter hyperintensities and decrease the risk of dementia.
Optimal measures of cardiovascular health are associated with brain health in adults, according to two studies published in the August 21 issue of JAMA.
In a French population-based cohort study, adults ages 65 and older with more cardiovascular health measures at ideal levels had a lower risk of dementia and lower rates of cognitive decline than did those with fewer optimal cardiovascular measures, such as blood pressure and physical activity.
In addition, a preliminary, cross-sectional study of younger adults found that the number of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors at recommended levels was associated with brain vessel structure and function and the number of white matter hyperintensities.
“These two studies convey an immediately actionable message to clinicians, policy makers, and patients,” said Jeffrey L. Saver, MD, and Mary Cushman, MD, in an accompanying editorial. “Available evidence indicates that to achieve a lifetime of robust brain health free of dementia, it is never too early or too late to strive for attainment of ideal cardiovascular health.” Dr. Saver is a Professor of Neurology and Director of the Stroke Center at the University of California, Los Angeles. Dr. Cushman is a Professor of Medicine and Pathology at Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont in Burlington.
Cardiovascular Health in Older Age
Vascular dementia is the second most common neuropathologic basis of dementia, after Alzheimer’s disease, and “most cases of dementia arise from a combination of [Alzheimer’s disease] and cerebrovascular pathology,” the editorialists noted. Studies have suggested a connection between cardiovascular health and dementia, but the evidence is limited.
Cécilia Samieri, PhD, a Senior Researcher at the Bordeaux Population Health Research Center at the Université de Bordeaux in France, and colleagues studied people age 65 and older from Bordeaux, Dijon, and Montpellier, France, to examine the association between cardiovascular health level and risk of dementia and cognitive decline in older adults.
The study included 6,626 people without a history of cardiovascular disease or dementia at baseline. Participants underwent in-person neuropsychologic testing between January 1999 and July 2016 and systematic detection of incident dementia. Participants had a mean age of 73.7, and 63.4% were women.
The investigators defined cardiovascular health using a seven-item tool from the American Heart Association (AHA). They determined the number of the AHA’s Life’s Simple Seven metrics that were at recommended levels (ie, nonsmoking, BMI < 25, regular physical activity, eating fish at least twice per week and fruits and vegetables at least three times per day, cholesterol < 200 mg/dL [untreated], fasting glucose < 100 mg/dL [untreated], and blood pressure < 120/80 mm Hg [untreated]).
Approximately 36.5% of the cohort had zero, one, or two optimal health metrics, 57.1% had three or four optimal health metrics, and 6.5% had five, six, or seven optimal health metrics.
During an average follow-up of 8.5 years, 745 participants developed dementia. Among participants with zero or one health metrics at optimal levels at baseline, the incidence rate of dementia was 1.76 per 100 person-years. Compared with this rate, the incidence rate per 100 person-years was 0.26 lower for participants with two optimal health metrics, 0.59 lower for participants with three optimal health metrics, 0.43 lower for participants with four optimal health metrics, 0.93 lower for participants with five optimal health metrics, and 0.96 lower for participants with six or seven optimal health metrics.
“In multivariable models, the hazard ratios for dementia were 0.90 per additional optimal metric,” the investigators said. “The study results support the recent recommendations of the AHA and the American Stroke Association for the promotion of the Life’s Simple Seven tool.”
Cerebrovascular Structure and Function in Young Adults
Wilby Williamson, BMBS
The researchers assessed patients’ cerebral vessel density, caliber, and tortuosity and brain white matter hyperintensity lesion count. In a subgroup of 52 participants, they assessed cerebral blood flow.
The researchers determined for each participant how many of eight modifiable risk factors were at recommended levels (ie, BMI < 25, highest tertile of cardiovascular fitness or physical activity, alcohol consumption < eight drinks per week, nonsmoker for more than six months, blood pressure on awake ambulatory monitoring < 130/80 mm Hg, a nonhypertensive diastolic response to exercise [ie, peak diastolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg], total cholesterol < 200 mg/dL, and fasting glucose < 100 mg/dL).
On average, participants had six of the eight modifiable cardiovascular risk factors at recommended levels.
In multivariable models, cardiovascular risk factors were associated with cerebrovascular structure and the number of white matter hyperintensities. “For each additional modifiable risk factor categorized as healthy, vessel density was greater by 0.3 vessels/cm3, vessel caliber was greater by 8 μm, and white matter hyperintensity lesions were fewer by 1.6 lesions. Among the 52 participants with available data, cerebral blood flow varied with vessel density and was 2.5 mL/100 g/min higher for each healthier category of a modifiable risk factor,” Dr. Williamson and colleagues said.
The findings suggest that “some individuals may be starting to diverge to different risk trajectories for brain vascular health in early adulthood,” the researchers said. The study was exploratory, however, and follow-up studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings, they said.
“The magnitude of changes was generally much less than would be expected to produce clinical symptoms such as cognitive impairment or gait difficulty,” said Drs. Saver and Cushman. The changes, however, “may portend more substantial abnormalities later in life,” they said. “Even during the late-life period, when septuagenarians become octogenarians, cardiovascular health is associated with substantial differences in cognitive trajectory and dementia onset.”
—Jake Remaly
Suggested Reading
Samieri C, Perier MC, Gaye B, et al. Association of cardiovascular health level in older age with cognitive decline and incident dementia. JAMA. 2018;320(7):657-664.
Saver JL, Cushman M. Striving for ideal cardiovascular and brain health: It is never too early or too late. JAMA. 2018; 320(7):645-647.
Williamson W, Lewandowski AJ, Forkert ND, et al. Association of cardiovascular risk factors with MRI indices of cerebrovascular structure and function and white matter hyperintensities in young adults. JAMA. 2018;320(7):665-673.
Optimal measures of cardiovascular health are associated with brain health in adults, according to two studies published in the August 21 issue of JAMA.
In a French population-based cohort study, adults ages 65 and older with more cardiovascular health measures at ideal levels had a lower risk of dementia and lower rates of cognitive decline than did those with fewer optimal cardiovascular measures, such as blood pressure and physical activity.
In addition, a preliminary, cross-sectional study of younger adults found that the number of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors at recommended levels was associated with brain vessel structure and function and the number of white matter hyperintensities.
“These two studies convey an immediately actionable message to clinicians, policy makers, and patients,” said Jeffrey L. Saver, MD, and Mary Cushman, MD, in an accompanying editorial. “Available evidence indicates that to achieve a lifetime of robust brain health free of dementia, it is never too early or too late to strive for attainment of ideal cardiovascular health.” Dr. Saver is a Professor of Neurology and Director of the Stroke Center at the University of California, Los Angeles. Dr. Cushman is a Professor of Medicine and Pathology at Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont in Burlington.
Cardiovascular Health in Older Age
Vascular dementia is the second most common neuropathologic basis of dementia, after Alzheimer’s disease, and “most cases of dementia arise from a combination of [Alzheimer’s disease] and cerebrovascular pathology,” the editorialists noted. Studies have suggested a connection between cardiovascular health and dementia, but the evidence is limited.
Cécilia Samieri, PhD, a Senior Researcher at the Bordeaux Population Health Research Center at the Université de Bordeaux in France, and colleagues studied people age 65 and older from Bordeaux, Dijon, and Montpellier, France, to examine the association between cardiovascular health level and risk of dementia and cognitive decline in older adults.
The study included 6,626 people without a history of cardiovascular disease or dementia at baseline. Participants underwent in-person neuropsychologic testing between January 1999 and July 2016 and systematic detection of incident dementia. Participants had a mean age of 73.7, and 63.4% were women.
The investigators defined cardiovascular health using a seven-item tool from the American Heart Association (AHA). They determined the number of the AHA’s Life’s Simple Seven metrics that were at recommended levels (ie, nonsmoking, BMI < 25, regular physical activity, eating fish at least twice per week and fruits and vegetables at least three times per day, cholesterol < 200 mg/dL [untreated], fasting glucose < 100 mg/dL [untreated], and blood pressure < 120/80 mm Hg [untreated]).
Approximately 36.5% of the cohort had zero, one, or two optimal health metrics, 57.1% had three or four optimal health metrics, and 6.5% had five, six, or seven optimal health metrics.
During an average follow-up of 8.5 years, 745 participants developed dementia. Among participants with zero or one health metrics at optimal levels at baseline, the incidence rate of dementia was 1.76 per 100 person-years. Compared with this rate, the incidence rate per 100 person-years was 0.26 lower for participants with two optimal health metrics, 0.59 lower for participants with three optimal health metrics, 0.43 lower for participants with four optimal health metrics, 0.93 lower for participants with five optimal health metrics, and 0.96 lower for participants with six or seven optimal health metrics.
“In multivariable models, the hazard ratios for dementia were 0.90 per additional optimal metric,” the investigators said. “The study results support the recent recommendations of the AHA and the American Stroke Association for the promotion of the Life’s Simple Seven tool.”
Cerebrovascular Structure and Function in Young Adults
Wilby Williamson, BMBS
The researchers assessed patients’ cerebral vessel density, caliber, and tortuosity and brain white matter hyperintensity lesion count. In a subgroup of 52 participants, they assessed cerebral blood flow.
The researchers determined for each participant how many of eight modifiable risk factors were at recommended levels (ie, BMI < 25, highest tertile of cardiovascular fitness or physical activity, alcohol consumption < eight drinks per week, nonsmoker for more than six months, blood pressure on awake ambulatory monitoring < 130/80 mm Hg, a nonhypertensive diastolic response to exercise [ie, peak diastolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg], total cholesterol < 200 mg/dL, and fasting glucose < 100 mg/dL).
On average, participants had six of the eight modifiable cardiovascular risk factors at recommended levels.
In multivariable models, cardiovascular risk factors were associated with cerebrovascular structure and the number of white matter hyperintensities. “For each additional modifiable risk factor categorized as healthy, vessel density was greater by 0.3 vessels/cm3, vessel caliber was greater by 8 μm, and white matter hyperintensity lesions were fewer by 1.6 lesions. Among the 52 participants with available data, cerebral blood flow varied with vessel density and was 2.5 mL/100 g/min higher for each healthier category of a modifiable risk factor,” Dr. Williamson and colleagues said.
The findings suggest that “some individuals may be starting to diverge to different risk trajectories for brain vascular health in early adulthood,” the researchers said. The study was exploratory, however, and follow-up studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings, they said.
“The magnitude of changes was generally much less than would be expected to produce clinical symptoms such as cognitive impairment or gait difficulty,” said Drs. Saver and Cushman. The changes, however, “may portend more substantial abnormalities later in life,” they said. “Even during the late-life period, when septuagenarians become octogenarians, cardiovascular health is associated with substantial differences in cognitive trajectory and dementia onset.”
—Jake Remaly
Suggested Reading
Samieri C, Perier MC, Gaye B, et al. Association of cardiovascular health level in older age with cognitive decline and incident dementia. JAMA. 2018;320(7):657-664.
Saver JL, Cushman M. Striving for ideal cardiovascular and brain health: It is never too early or too late. JAMA. 2018; 320(7):645-647.
Williamson W, Lewandowski AJ, Forkert ND, et al. Association of cardiovascular risk factors with MRI indices of cerebrovascular structure and function and white matter hyperintensities in young adults. JAMA. 2018;320(7):665-673.