Bipolar Disorder

Clinical Psychiatry News is pleased to announce that Andrea Murru, MD, PhD, has joined the Editorial Advisory Board.

Dr. Murru is senior clinician in the bipolar disorder and sleep disorder units of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona in Spain, and is a postdoctoral researcher of the Spanish Network of Research in Mental Health, which is led by Eduard Vieta, MD, PhD.

In addition, Dr. Murru is author of several scientific books and chapters and more than 70 peer-reviewed articles on the treatment of bipolar disorder. His research focuses on using, long-term treatments, and implementing clinical guidelines in daily practice. He also researches tolerability in patients with bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and sleep-related disorders and biomarkers.

He earned his medical degree from the University of Cagliari (Italy).
 

Clinical Psychiatry News is pleased to announce that Andrea Murru, MD, PhD, has joined the Editorial Advisory Board.

Dr. Murru is senior clinician in the bipolar disorder and sleep disorder units of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona in Spain, and is a postdoctoral researcher of the Spanish Network of Research in Mental Health, which is led by Eduard Vieta, MD, PhD.

In addition, Dr. Murru is author of several scientific books and chapters and more than 70 peer-reviewed articles on the treatment of bipolar disorder. His research focuses on using, long-term treatments, and implementing clinical guidelines in daily practice. He also researches tolerability in patients with bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and sleep-related disorders and biomarkers.

He earned his medical degree from the University of Cagliari (Italy).
 

Clinical Psychiatry News is pleased to announce that Andrea Murru, MD, PhD, has joined the Editorial Advisory Board.

Dr. Murru is senior clinician in the bipolar disorder and sleep disorder units of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona in Spain, and is a postdoctoral researcher of the Spanish Network of Research in Mental Health, which is led by Eduard Vieta, MD, PhD.

In addition, Dr. Murru is author of several scientific books and chapters and more than 70 peer-reviewed articles on the treatment of bipolar disorder. His research focuses on using, long-term treatments, and implementing clinical guidelines in daily practice. He also researches tolerability in patients with bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and sleep-related disorders and biomarkers.

He earned his medical degree from the University of Cagliari (Italy).
 

CASE Depression, or something else?

Ms. A, age 56, presents to the emergency department (ED) with depressed mood, poor sleep, anhedonia, irritability, agitation, and recent self-injurious behavior; she had super­ficially cut her wrists. She also has a longstanding history of multiple sclerosis (MS), depression, and anxiety. She is admitted voluntarily to an inpatient psychiatric unit.

According to medical records, at age 32, Ms. A was diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS, which initially presented with facial numbness, and later with optic neuritis with transient loss of vision. As her disease progressed to the secondary progressive type, she experienced spasticity and vertigo. In the past few years, she also had experienced cognitive difficulties, particularly with memory and focus.

Ms. A has a history of recurrent depressive symptoms that began at an unspecified time after being diagnosed with MS. In the past few years, she had greatly increased her alcohol use in response to multiple psychosocial stressors and as an attempt to self-medicate MS-related pain. Several years ago, Ms. A had been admitted to a rehabilitation facility to address her alcohol use.
 

In the past, Ms. A’s depressive symptoms had been treated with various antidepressants, including fluoxetine (unspecified dose), which for a time was effective. The most recently prescribed antidepressant was duloxetine, 60 mg/d, which was discontinued because Ms. A felt it activated her mood lability. A few years before this current hospitalization, Ms. A had been started on a trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine (20 mg/10 mg, twice daily), which was discontinued due to concomitant use of an unspecified serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) and subsequent precipitation of serotonin syndrome.

At the time of this current admission to the psychiatric unit, Ms. A is being treated for MS with rituximab (10 mg/mL IV, every 6 months). Additionally, just before her admission, she was taking alprazolam (.25 mg, 3 times per day) for anxiety. She denies experiencing any spasticity or vision impairment.

[polldaddy:10175070]

The authors’ observations

We initially considered a diagnosis of MDD due to Ms. A’s past history of depressive episodes, her recent increase in tearfulness and anhedonia, and her self-injurious behaviors. However, diagnosis of a mood disorder was complicated by her complex history of longstanding MS and other psychosocial factors.

Continue to: Several factors contribute to the neuro­psychiatric course of patients with MS...

EVALUATION No exacerbation of MS

Upon admission, Ms. A’s lability of affect is apparent as she quickly switches from being tearful to bright depending on the topic of discussion. She smiles when talking about the hobbies she enjoys and becomes tearful when speaking of personal problems within her family. She denies suicidal ideation/intent, shows no evidence of psychosis, and denies any history of bipolar disorder or recollection of hypomanic/manic symptoms. Overall, she exhibits low energy and difficulty sleeping, and reiterates her various psychosocial stressors, including her family history of depression and ongoing marital conflicts. Ms. A denies experiencing any acute exacerbations of clinical neurologic features of MS immediately before or during her admission. Laboratory values are normal, except for an elevated thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) value of 11.136 uIU/mL, which is expected given her history of hypothyroidism. Results of the most recent brain MRI scans for Ms. A are pending.

The authors’ observations

Although we considered a diagnosis of bipolar disorder–mixed subtype, this was less likely to be the diagnosis considering her lack of any frank manic/hypomanic symptoms or history of such symptoms. Additionally, while we also considered a diagnosis of pseudobulbar affect due to her current mood swings and past trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine, this diagnosis was also less likely because Ms. A’s affect was not characterized by uncontrollable outbursts of emotion but was congruent with her experiences and surroundings. For example, Ms. A smiled when talking about her hobbies and became tearful when speaking of conflicts within her family.

Given Ms. A’s mood dysregulation and lability and her history of depressive episodes that began to manifest after her diagnosis of MS was established, and after ruling out other etiologic psychiatric disorders, a diagnosis of mood disorder secondary to MS was made.

[polldaddy:10175136]

Continue to: TREATMENT Mood stabilization

We start Ms. A on divalproex sodium, 250 mg 2 times a day, which is eventually titrated to 250 mg every morning with an additional daily 750 mg (total daily dose of 1,000 mg) for mood stabilization. Additionally, quetiapine, 50 mg nightly, is added and eventually titrated to 300 mg to augment mood stabilization and to aid sleep. Before being admitted, Ms. A had been prescribed alprazolam for anxiety; she is switched to longer-acting clonazepam, .5 mg/d, to minimize the potential for withdrawal symptoms while she is hospitalized.

The authors’ observations

Definitive treatments for psychiatric conditions in patients with MS have been lacking, and current recommendations are based on regimens used to treat general psychiatric populations. For example, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are frequently considered for treatment of MDD in patients with MS, whereas SNRIs are considered for patients with concomitant neuropathic pain.¹³ Similarly, lithium and valproic acid (divalproex sodium) are the pharmacotherapies of choice for mood stabilization,² while CBT appears to be the main psychotherapy showing benefit for patients with MS who are depressed.¹⁴ As with any patient, response and reactions to treatment should be closely monitored. Given the lack of definitive regimens, along with the ambiguity of neurologic and psychiatric symptom etiology in terms of physiologic vs psychosocial contributions, the need for trial and error in terms of choice of treatment and optimal dosages becomes essential.

OUTCOME Improved mood, energy

After 2 weeks of inpatient treatment, Ms. A shows improvement in mood lability and energy levels, and she is able to tolerate titration of divalproex sodium and quetiapine to therapeutic levels. She is referred to an outpatient psychiatrist after discharge, as well as a follow-up appointment with her neurologist. On discharge, Ms. A expresses a commitment to treatment and hope for the future.

CASE Depression, or something else?

Ms. A, age 56, presents to the emergency department (ED) with depressed mood, poor sleep, anhedonia, irritability, agitation, and recent self-injurious behavior; she had super­ficially cut her wrists. She also has a longstanding history of multiple sclerosis (MS), depression, and anxiety. She is admitted voluntarily to an inpatient psychiatric unit.

According to medical records, at age 32, Ms. A was diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS, which initially presented with facial numbness, and later with optic neuritis with transient loss of vision. As her disease progressed to the secondary progressive type, she experienced spasticity and vertigo. In the past few years, she also had experienced cognitive difficulties, particularly with memory and focus.

Ms. A has a history of recurrent depressive symptoms that began at an unspecified time after being diagnosed with MS. In the past few years, she had greatly increased her alcohol use in response to multiple psychosocial stressors and as an attempt to self-medicate MS-related pain. Several years ago, Ms. A had been admitted to a rehabilitation facility to address her alcohol use.
 

In the past, Ms. A’s depressive symptoms had been treated with various antidepressants, including fluoxetine (unspecified dose), which for a time was effective. The most recently prescribed antidepressant was duloxetine, 60 mg/d, which was discontinued because Ms. A felt it activated her mood lability. A few years before this current hospitalization, Ms. A had been started on a trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine (20 mg/10 mg, twice daily), which was discontinued due to concomitant use of an unspecified serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) and subsequent precipitation of serotonin syndrome.

At the time of this current admission to the psychiatric unit, Ms. A is being treated for MS with rituximab (10 mg/mL IV, every 6 months). Additionally, just before her admission, she was taking alprazolam (.25 mg, 3 times per day) for anxiety. She denies experiencing any spasticity or vision impairment.

[polldaddy:10175070]

The authors’ observations

We initially considered a diagnosis of MDD due to Ms. A’s past history of depressive episodes, her recent increase in tearfulness and anhedonia, and her self-injurious behaviors. However, diagnosis of a mood disorder was complicated by her complex history of longstanding MS and other psychosocial factors.

Continue to: Several factors contribute to the neuro­psychiatric course of patients with MS...

EVALUATION No exacerbation of MS

Upon admission, Ms. A’s lability of affect is apparent as she quickly switches from being tearful to bright depending on the topic of discussion. She smiles when talking about the hobbies she enjoys and becomes tearful when speaking of personal problems within her family. She denies suicidal ideation/intent, shows no evidence of psychosis, and denies any history of bipolar disorder or recollection of hypomanic/manic symptoms. Overall, she exhibits low energy and difficulty sleeping, and reiterates her various psychosocial stressors, including her family history of depression and ongoing marital conflicts. Ms. A denies experiencing any acute exacerbations of clinical neurologic features of MS immediately before or during her admission. Laboratory values are normal, except for an elevated thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) value of 11.136 uIU/mL, which is expected given her history of hypothyroidism. Results of the most recent brain MRI scans for Ms. A are pending.

The authors’ observations

Although we considered a diagnosis of bipolar disorder–mixed subtype, this was less likely to be the diagnosis considering her lack of any frank manic/hypomanic symptoms or history of such symptoms. Additionally, while we also considered a diagnosis of pseudobulbar affect due to her current mood swings and past trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine, this diagnosis was also less likely because Ms. A’s affect was not characterized by uncontrollable outbursts of emotion but was congruent with her experiences and surroundings. For example, Ms. A smiled when talking about her hobbies and became tearful when speaking of conflicts within her family.

Given Ms. A’s mood dysregulation and lability and her history of depressive episodes that began to manifest after her diagnosis of MS was established, and after ruling out other etiologic psychiatric disorders, a diagnosis of mood disorder secondary to MS was made.

[polldaddy:10175136]

Continue to: TREATMENT Mood stabilization

We start Ms. A on divalproex sodium, 250 mg 2 times a day, which is eventually titrated to 250 mg every morning with an additional daily 750 mg (total daily dose of 1,000 mg) for mood stabilization. Additionally, quetiapine, 50 mg nightly, is added and eventually titrated to 300 mg to augment mood stabilization and to aid sleep. Before being admitted, Ms. A had been prescribed alprazolam for anxiety; she is switched to longer-acting clonazepam, .5 mg/d, to minimize the potential for withdrawal symptoms while she is hospitalized.

The authors’ observations

Definitive treatments for psychiatric conditions in patients with MS have been lacking, and current recommendations are based on regimens used to treat general psychiatric populations. For example, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are frequently considered for treatment of MDD in patients with MS, whereas SNRIs are considered for patients with concomitant neuropathic pain.¹³ Similarly, lithium and valproic acid (divalproex sodium) are the pharmacotherapies of choice for mood stabilization,² while CBT appears to be the main psychotherapy showing benefit for patients with MS who are depressed.¹⁴ As with any patient, response and reactions to treatment should be closely monitored. Given the lack of definitive regimens, along with the ambiguity of neurologic and psychiatric symptom etiology in terms of physiologic vs psychosocial contributions, the need for trial and error in terms of choice of treatment and optimal dosages becomes essential.

OUTCOME Improved mood, energy

After 2 weeks of inpatient treatment, Ms. A shows improvement in mood lability and energy levels, and she is able to tolerate titration of divalproex sodium and quetiapine to therapeutic levels. She is referred to an outpatient psychiatrist after discharge, as well as a follow-up appointment with her neurologist. On discharge, Ms. A expresses a commitment to treatment and hope for the future.

CASE Depression, or something else?

Ms. A, age 56, presents to the emergency department (ED) with depressed mood, poor sleep, anhedonia, irritability, agitation, and recent self-injurious behavior; she had super­ficially cut her wrists. She also has a longstanding history of multiple sclerosis (MS), depression, and anxiety. She is admitted voluntarily to an inpatient psychiatric unit.

According to medical records, at age 32, Ms. A was diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS, which initially presented with facial numbness, and later with optic neuritis with transient loss of vision. As her disease progressed to the secondary progressive type, she experienced spasticity and vertigo. In the past few years, she also had experienced cognitive difficulties, particularly with memory and focus.

Ms. A has a history of recurrent depressive symptoms that began at an unspecified time after being diagnosed with MS. In the past few years, she had greatly increased her alcohol use in response to multiple psychosocial stressors and as an attempt to self-medicate MS-related pain. Several years ago, Ms. A had been admitted to a rehabilitation facility to address her alcohol use.
 

In the past, Ms. A’s depressive symptoms had been treated with various antidepressants, including fluoxetine (unspecified dose), which for a time was effective. The most recently prescribed antidepressant was duloxetine, 60 mg/d, which was discontinued because Ms. A felt it activated her mood lability. A few years before this current hospitalization, Ms. A had been started on a trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine (20 mg/10 mg, twice daily), which was discontinued due to concomitant use of an unspecified serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) and subsequent precipitation of serotonin syndrome.

At the time of this current admission to the psychiatric unit, Ms. A is being treated for MS with rituximab (10 mg/mL IV, every 6 months). Additionally, just before her admission, she was taking alprazolam (.25 mg, 3 times per day) for anxiety. She denies experiencing any spasticity or vision impairment.

[polldaddy:10175070]

The authors’ observations

We initially considered a diagnosis of MDD due to Ms. A’s past history of depressive episodes, her recent increase in tearfulness and anhedonia, and her self-injurious behaviors. However, diagnosis of a mood disorder was complicated by her complex history of longstanding MS and other psychosocial factors.

Continue to: Several factors contribute to the neuro­psychiatric course of patients with MS...

EVALUATION No exacerbation of MS

Upon admission, Ms. A’s lability of affect is apparent as she quickly switches from being tearful to bright depending on the topic of discussion. She smiles when talking about the hobbies she enjoys and becomes tearful when speaking of personal problems within her family. She denies suicidal ideation/intent, shows no evidence of psychosis, and denies any history of bipolar disorder or recollection of hypomanic/manic symptoms. Overall, she exhibits low energy and difficulty sleeping, and reiterates her various psychosocial stressors, including her family history of depression and ongoing marital conflicts. Ms. A denies experiencing any acute exacerbations of clinical neurologic features of MS immediately before or during her admission. Laboratory values are normal, except for an elevated thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) value of 11.136 uIU/mL, which is expected given her history of hypothyroidism. Results of the most recent brain MRI scans for Ms. A are pending.

The authors’ observations

Although we considered a diagnosis of bipolar disorder–mixed subtype, this was less likely to be the diagnosis considering her lack of any frank manic/hypomanic symptoms or history of such symptoms. Additionally, while we also considered a diagnosis of pseudobulbar affect due to her current mood swings and past trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine, this diagnosis was also less likely because Ms. A’s affect was not characterized by uncontrollable outbursts of emotion but was congruent with her experiences and surroundings. For example, Ms. A smiled when talking about her hobbies and became tearful when speaking of conflicts within her family.

Given Ms. A’s mood dysregulation and lability and her history of depressive episodes that began to manifest after her diagnosis of MS was established, and after ruling out other etiologic psychiatric disorders, a diagnosis of mood disorder secondary to MS was made.

[polldaddy:10175136]

Continue to: TREATMENT Mood stabilization

We start Ms. A on divalproex sodium, 250 mg 2 times a day, which is eventually titrated to 250 mg every morning with an additional daily 750 mg (total daily dose of 1,000 mg) for mood stabilization. Additionally, quetiapine, 50 mg nightly, is added and eventually titrated to 300 mg to augment mood stabilization and to aid sleep. Before being admitted, Ms. A had been prescribed alprazolam for anxiety; she is switched to longer-acting clonazepam, .5 mg/d, to minimize the potential for withdrawal symptoms while she is hospitalized.

The authors’ observations

Definitive treatments for psychiatric conditions in patients with MS have been lacking, and current recommendations are based on regimens used to treat general psychiatric populations. For example, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are frequently considered for treatment of MDD in patients with MS, whereas SNRIs are considered for patients with concomitant neuropathic pain.¹³ Similarly, lithium and valproic acid (divalproex sodium) are the pharmacotherapies of choice for mood stabilization,² while CBT appears to be the main psychotherapy showing benefit for patients with MS who are depressed.¹⁴ As with any patient, response and reactions to treatment should be closely monitored. Given the lack of definitive regimens, along with the ambiguity of neurologic and psychiatric symptom etiology in terms of physiologic vs psychosocial contributions, the need for trial and error in terms of choice of treatment and optimal dosages becomes essential.

OUTCOME Improved mood, energy

After 2 weeks of inpatient treatment, Ms. A shows improvement in mood lability and energy levels, and she is able to tolerate titration of divalproex sodium and quetiapine to therapeutic levels. She is referred to an outpatient psychiatrist after discharge, as well as a follow-up appointment with her neurologist. On discharge, Ms. A expresses a commitment to treatment and hope for the future.

BARCELONA – Hypersomnia is a novel, previously unappreciated factor useful in tipping the balance in favor of an underlying bipolar predisposition in patients with an acute major depressive episode, Andrea Murru, MD, PhD, reported at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“This may help us in clinical practice. It’s an effective, costless, and highly objective clinical measure. It’s one question, and it takes a second. It’s simply asking the patient: ‘Are you sleeping more hours at night than usual?’ It’s a very simple clinical question that could really change the focus of treatment for a patient,” said Dr. Murru, a clinical psychiatrist in the bipolar disorders program of the University of Barcelona.

He presented a post hoc analysis of 2,514 acutely depressed individuals who participated in the BRIDGE-II-MIX (Bipolar Disorders: Improving Diagnosis, Guidance and Education) study, an international, multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study aimed at better characterizing clinically valid mixed features of depression indicative of concurrent manic symptoms.

“This is one of a whole series of hypothesis-generating studies from BRIDGE-II-MIX that are trying to deal with the struggle of understanding whether all the elements that favor mixicity and an underpinning bipolar diathesis are fairly represented in the diagnostic criteria in DSM-5. And what we are basically finding is the DSM-5 criteria are leaving out important symptoms that really do play a role,” the psychiatrist said in an interview.

One of those missing factors, he continued, is hypersomnia. It was present in 16.8% of the study population, and he and his coinvestigators compared them in terms of clinical variables, current and past psychiatric symptoms, and sociodemographics with the 83.2% of patients with insomnia. That is, patients who got fewer hours of sleep than normal and felt fatigued during the next day were compared with those who felt a reduced need to sleep.

The two groups differed in important ways. Hypersomnia showed a powerful correlation with a physician diagnosis of major depressive episode with atypical features, being present in 32.2% of such patients, while a mere 1.8% had insomnia. Moreover, among patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder I or II, 20.6% reported hypersomnia, a significantly higher proportion than the 16% who had insomnia.

The finding that only 5% of BRIDGE-II-MIX participants with hypersomnia met DSM-5 criteria for a mixed-state specifier, a rate not significantly different from the 8.3% figure in those with insomnia, underscores the drawbacks of the DSM-5 criteria, according to Dr. Murru. He noted that, in contrast to the DSM-5 criteria, 32.9% of the hypersomniac patients with a major depressive episode met Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for a mixed-state specifier, a rate significantly higher than the 27.6% figure in patients with insomnia.

Specifically, the individual RDC mixed-state specifiers that stood out as significantly more frequent among depressed patients with hypersomnia than insomnia were racing thoughts, by a margin of 15.1% to 10.6%; impulsivity, 16.8% versus 13.2%; distractibility, 29.6% versus 23.4%; hypersexuality, which was present in 4% of patients with hypersomnia but only 2.3% with insomnia; irritable mood, 33.1% versus 24.8%; and a history of insufficient response to previous antidepressant therapy, 34.3%, compared with 27.1% in insomniacs.

When Dr. Murru and his coinvestigators performed a stepwise linear regression analysis to identify significant predictors of hypersomnia in patients with a major depressive episode, they found that the sleep abnormality keeps some interesting company. Patients with current bulimia were 4.21-fold more likely to have hypersomnia than those without the eating disorder. Current social phobia was associated with a 1.77-fold increased risk of hypersomnia; mood lability on prior antidepressant therapy carried a 1.37-fold risk, as did current mood lability; prior attempted suicide was associated with a 1.31-fold increased risk; being overweight or obese was associated with a 1.42-fold risk; currently being on a mood stabilizer carried a 1.33-fold increased risk of hypersomnia; and currently being on an atypical antipsychotic agent had a 1.36-fold greater risk.

Dr. Murru concluded that the take-home message of this study – “Of course, conceding it’s highly exploratory nature intrinsic to a post hoc analysis,” he noted – is that hypersomnia should be included among the symptoms that trigger the “with mixed features” specifier in patients with a major depressive episode.

The BRIDGE-II-MIX study was sponsored by Sanofi-Aventis. Dr. Murru reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding the study.

[email protected]

BARCELONA – Hypersomnia is a novel, previously unappreciated factor useful in tipping the balance in favor of an underlying bipolar predisposition in patients with an acute major depressive episode, Andrea Murru, MD, PhD, reported at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“This may help us in clinical practice. It’s an effective, costless, and highly objective clinical measure. It’s one question, and it takes a second. It’s simply asking the patient: ‘Are you sleeping more hours at night than usual?’ It’s a very simple clinical question that could really change the focus of treatment for a patient,” said Dr. Murru, a clinical psychiatrist in the bipolar disorders program of the University of Barcelona.

He presented a post hoc analysis of 2,514 acutely depressed individuals who participated in the BRIDGE-II-MIX (Bipolar Disorders: Improving Diagnosis, Guidance and Education) study, an international, multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study aimed at better characterizing clinically valid mixed features of depression indicative of concurrent manic symptoms.

“This is one of a whole series of hypothesis-generating studies from BRIDGE-II-MIX that are trying to deal with the struggle of understanding whether all the elements that favor mixicity and an underpinning bipolar diathesis are fairly represented in the diagnostic criteria in DSM-5. And what we are basically finding is the DSM-5 criteria are leaving out important symptoms that really do play a role,” the psychiatrist said in an interview.

One of those missing factors, he continued, is hypersomnia. It was present in 16.8% of the study population, and he and his coinvestigators compared them in terms of clinical variables, current and past psychiatric symptoms, and sociodemographics with the 83.2% of patients with insomnia. That is, patients who got fewer hours of sleep than normal and felt fatigued during the next day were compared with those who felt a reduced need to sleep.

The two groups differed in important ways. Hypersomnia showed a powerful correlation with a physician diagnosis of major depressive episode with atypical features, being present in 32.2% of such patients, while a mere 1.8% had insomnia. Moreover, among patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder I or II, 20.6% reported hypersomnia, a significantly higher proportion than the 16% who had insomnia.

The finding that only 5% of BRIDGE-II-MIX participants with hypersomnia met DSM-5 criteria for a mixed-state specifier, a rate not significantly different from the 8.3% figure in those with insomnia, underscores the drawbacks of the DSM-5 criteria, according to Dr. Murru. He noted that, in contrast to the DSM-5 criteria, 32.9% of the hypersomniac patients with a major depressive episode met Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for a mixed-state specifier, a rate significantly higher than the 27.6% figure in patients with insomnia.

Specifically, the individual RDC mixed-state specifiers that stood out as significantly more frequent among depressed patients with hypersomnia than insomnia were racing thoughts, by a margin of 15.1% to 10.6%; impulsivity, 16.8% versus 13.2%; distractibility, 29.6% versus 23.4%; hypersexuality, which was present in 4% of patients with hypersomnia but only 2.3% with insomnia; irritable mood, 33.1% versus 24.8%; and a history of insufficient response to previous antidepressant therapy, 34.3%, compared with 27.1% in insomniacs.

When Dr. Murru and his coinvestigators performed a stepwise linear regression analysis to identify significant predictors of hypersomnia in patients with a major depressive episode, they found that the sleep abnormality keeps some interesting company. Patients with current bulimia were 4.21-fold more likely to have hypersomnia than those without the eating disorder. Current social phobia was associated with a 1.77-fold increased risk of hypersomnia; mood lability on prior antidepressant therapy carried a 1.37-fold risk, as did current mood lability; prior attempted suicide was associated with a 1.31-fold increased risk; being overweight or obese was associated with a 1.42-fold risk; currently being on a mood stabilizer carried a 1.33-fold increased risk of hypersomnia; and currently being on an atypical antipsychotic agent had a 1.36-fold greater risk.

Dr. Murru concluded that the take-home message of this study – “Of course, conceding it’s highly exploratory nature intrinsic to a post hoc analysis,” he noted – is that hypersomnia should be included among the symptoms that trigger the “with mixed features” specifier in patients with a major depressive episode.

The BRIDGE-II-MIX study was sponsored by Sanofi-Aventis. Dr. Murru reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding the study.

[email protected]

BARCELONA – Hypersomnia is a novel, previously unappreciated factor useful in tipping the balance in favor of an underlying bipolar predisposition in patients with an acute major depressive episode, Andrea Murru, MD, PhD, reported at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“This may help us in clinical practice. It’s an effective, costless, and highly objective clinical measure. It’s one question, and it takes a second. It’s simply asking the patient: ‘Are you sleeping more hours at night than usual?’ It’s a very simple clinical question that could really change the focus of treatment for a patient,” said Dr. Murru, a clinical psychiatrist in the bipolar disorders program of the University of Barcelona.

He presented a post hoc analysis of 2,514 acutely depressed individuals who participated in the BRIDGE-II-MIX (Bipolar Disorders: Improving Diagnosis, Guidance and Education) study, an international, multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study aimed at better characterizing clinically valid mixed features of depression indicative of concurrent manic symptoms.

“This is one of a whole series of hypothesis-generating studies from BRIDGE-II-MIX that are trying to deal with the struggle of understanding whether all the elements that favor mixicity and an underpinning bipolar diathesis are fairly represented in the diagnostic criteria in DSM-5. And what we are basically finding is the DSM-5 criteria are leaving out important symptoms that really do play a role,” the psychiatrist said in an interview.

One of those missing factors, he continued, is hypersomnia. It was present in 16.8% of the study population, and he and his coinvestigators compared them in terms of clinical variables, current and past psychiatric symptoms, and sociodemographics with the 83.2% of patients with insomnia. That is, patients who got fewer hours of sleep than normal and felt fatigued during the next day were compared with those who felt a reduced need to sleep.

The two groups differed in important ways. Hypersomnia showed a powerful correlation with a physician diagnosis of major depressive episode with atypical features, being present in 32.2% of such patients, while a mere 1.8% had insomnia. Moreover, among patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder I or II, 20.6% reported hypersomnia, a significantly higher proportion than the 16% who had insomnia.

The finding that only 5% of BRIDGE-II-MIX participants with hypersomnia met DSM-5 criteria for a mixed-state specifier, a rate not significantly different from the 8.3% figure in those with insomnia, underscores the drawbacks of the DSM-5 criteria, according to Dr. Murru. He noted that, in contrast to the DSM-5 criteria, 32.9% of the hypersomniac patients with a major depressive episode met Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for a mixed-state specifier, a rate significantly higher than the 27.6% figure in patients with insomnia.

Specifically, the individual RDC mixed-state specifiers that stood out as significantly more frequent among depressed patients with hypersomnia than insomnia were racing thoughts, by a margin of 15.1% to 10.6%; impulsivity, 16.8% versus 13.2%; distractibility, 29.6% versus 23.4%; hypersexuality, which was present in 4% of patients with hypersomnia but only 2.3% with insomnia; irritable mood, 33.1% versus 24.8%; and a history of insufficient response to previous antidepressant therapy, 34.3%, compared with 27.1% in insomniacs.

When Dr. Murru and his coinvestigators performed a stepwise linear regression analysis to identify significant predictors of hypersomnia in patients with a major depressive episode, they found that the sleep abnormality keeps some interesting company. Patients with current bulimia were 4.21-fold more likely to have hypersomnia than those without the eating disorder. Current social phobia was associated with a 1.77-fold increased risk of hypersomnia; mood lability on prior antidepressant therapy carried a 1.37-fold risk, as did current mood lability; prior attempted suicide was associated with a 1.31-fold increased risk; being overweight or obese was associated with a 1.42-fold risk; currently being on a mood stabilizer carried a 1.33-fold increased risk of hypersomnia; and currently being on an atypical antipsychotic agent had a 1.36-fold greater risk.

Dr. Murru concluded that the take-home message of this study – “Of course, conceding it’s highly exploratory nature intrinsic to a post hoc analysis,” he noted – is that hypersomnia should be included among the symptoms that trigger the “with mixed features” specifier in patients with a major depressive episode.

The BRIDGE-II-MIX study was sponsored by Sanofi-Aventis. Dr. Murru reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding the study.

[email protected]

BARCELONA – Lithium and valproic acid are the treatments of choice for patients with bipolar disorder at increased risk for suicide, according to the findings of a large Finnish national study.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“We found that – surprise, surprise – lithium and valproic acid had the lowest risk of anyone committing suicide on them. And funnily enough, some antidepressants seemed to be correlated with a higher risk of committing suicide,” Markku Lähteenvuo, MD, PhD, said at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

However, he suspects that the correlation between antidepressant therapy and suicide in bipolar patients probably was caused by confounding by indication.

“I wouldn’t have as a take-home message that SSRI [selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor] antidepressants are bad for you; it’s probably rather that these are really bad cases, treatment gets initiated when someone gets worse, and the antidepressants just aren’t quick enough to really give an effect. It takes 3-4 weeks for an SSRI to really kick in, whereas mood stabilizers like lithium and valproic acid usually kick in almost immediately, within a couple of days to a week,” explained Dr. Lähteenvuo, a forensic psychiatrist at Niuvanniemi Hospital and the University of Eastern Finland, in Kuopio.

He presented a study of all suicides among the 18,018 Finnish patients hospitalized for bipolar disorder nationwide during 1996-2012. Using prospective national databases to follow patients for a mean of 7.2 years, he and his coinvestigators were able to determine what medications they were on when they committed suicide and the likelihood they were actually taking their prescribed medications at the time.


In a multivariate proportional hazards analysis adjusted for concomitant psychotropic medications, duration of bipolar illness, intervals of drug exposure and nonexposure, age, sex, and number of hospitalizations for suicidality within the prior 2 years, bipolar patients on lithium had a 67% lower risk of suicide than did those not on the drug. Those on valproic acid were 39% less likely to commit suicide than those not on that mood stabilizer. And bipolar patients on lithium were 42% less likely to die from suicide than those on valproic acid.

At the other extreme, patients on antidepressants were in aggregate 28% more likely to commit suicide than those who were not. This risk varied considerably according to the specific antidepressant: for example, escitalopram and mirtazapine were associated with 71% and 57% greater risks of suicide, respectively, than in patients not on those antidepressants, while patients on paroxetine, venlafaxine, or sertraline were not at increased risk.

Also, the use of sedatives was associated with a 52% greater likelihood of suicide, and benzodiazepines were linked to a 21% increase in risk. Again, as with antidepressants, these associations with increased risk of completed suicide could be attributable in part or in whole to confounding by indication, the psychiatrist noted. He and his colleagues are conducting further analyses examining that possibility.


Pending the outcome of that closer look, however, Dr. Lähteenvuo believes the study’s message to clinicians is clear: “The use of lithium is getting less and less common all the time because of side effects. That’s also true for valproic acid. Many bipolar patients are now prescribed only antidepressants, even though all the guidelines advise against it due to the risk of hypomania. We think that this is a bad trend and that lithium and valproic acid should be prescribed more. Also, as a safety precaution, anyone with bipolar disorder on antidepressants or benzodiazepines or sedatives should be followed especially closely for suicidal signals, because they could carry a really highly increased risk – up to 50% – due to the medication as well.”

He reported having no financial conflicts regarding the study, funded by the Finnish government.

Dr. Lähteenvuo also was first author of a recent study showing that among the various drugs prescribed for treatment of bipolar disorder, lithium was the clear winner for prevention of rehospitalization in the same national Finnish population of more than 18,000 bipolar patients (JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75[4]:347-55). One expert named this among the top four studies of the year in the field of mood disorders.

[email protected]

BARCELONA – Lithium and valproic acid are the treatments of choice for patients with bipolar disorder at increased risk for suicide, according to the findings of a large Finnish national study.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“We found that – surprise, surprise – lithium and valproic acid had the lowest risk of anyone committing suicide on them. And funnily enough, some antidepressants seemed to be correlated with a higher risk of committing suicide,” Markku Lähteenvuo, MD, PhD, said at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

However, he suspects that the correlation between antidepressant therapy and suicide in bipolar patients probably was caused by confounding by indication.

“I wouldn’t have as a take-home message that SSRI [selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor] antidepressants are bad for you; it’s probably rather that these are really bad cases, treatment gets initiated when someone gets worse, and the antidepressants just aren’t quick enough to really give an effect. It takes 3-4 weeks for an SSRI to really kick in, whereas mood stabilizers like lithium and valproic acid usually kick in almost immediately, within a couple of days to a week,” explained Dr. Lähteenvuo, a forensic psychiatrist at Niuvanniemi Hospital and the University of Eastern Finland, in Kuopio.

He presented a study of all suicides among the 18,018 Finnish patients hospitalized for bipolar disorder nationwide during 1996-2012. Using prospective national databases to follow patients for a mean of 7.2 years, he and his coinvestigators were able to determine what medications they were on when they committed suicide and the likelihood they were actually taking their prescribed medications at the time.


In a multivariate proportional hazards analysis adjusted for concomitant psychotropic medications, duration of bipolar illness, intervals of drug exposure and nonexposure, age, sex, and number of hospitalizations for suicidality within the prior 2 years, bipolar patients on lithium had a 67% lower risk of suicide than did those not on the drug. Those on valproic acid were 39% less likely to commit suicide than those not on that mood stabilizer. And bipolar patients on lithium were 42% less likely to die from suicide than those on valproic acid.

At the other extreme, patients on antidepressants were in aggregate 28% more likely to commit suicide than those who were not. This risk varied considerably according to the specific antidepressant: for example, escitalopram and mirtazapine were associated with 71% and 57% greater risks of suicide, respectively, than in patients not on those antidepressants, while patients on paroxetine, venlafaxine, or sertraline were not at increased risk.

Also, the use of sedatives was associated with a 52% greater likelihood of suicide, and benzodiazepines were linked to a 21% increase in risk. Again, as with antidepressants, these associations with increased risk of completed suicide could be attributable in part or in whole to confounding by indication, the psychiatrist noted. He and his colleagues are conducting further analyses examining that possibility.


Pending the outcome of that closer look, however, Dr. Lähteenvuo believes the study’s message to clinicians is clear: “The use of lithium is getting less and less common all the time because of side effects. That’s also true for valproic acid. Many bipolar patients are now prescribed only antidepressants, even though all the guidelines advise against it due to the risk of hypomania. We think that this is a bad trend and that lithium and valproic acid should be prescribed more. Also, as a safety precaution, anyone with bipolar disorder on antidepressants or benzodiazepines or sedatives should be followed especially closely for suicidal signals, because they could carry a really highly increased risk – up to 50% – due to the medication as well.”

He reported having no financial conflicts regarding the study, funded by the Finnish government.

Dr. Lähteenvuo also was first author of a recent study showing that among the various drugs prescribed for treatment of bipolar disorder, lithium was the clear winner for prevention of rehospitalization in the same national Finnish population of more than 18,000 bipolar patients (JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75[4]:347-55). One expert named this among the top four studies of the year in the field of mood disorders.

[email protected]

BARCELONA – Lithium and valproic acid are the treatments of choice for patients with bipolar disorder at increased risk for suicide, according to the findings of a large Finnish national study.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“We found that – surprise, surprise – lithium and valproic acid had the lowest risk of anyone committing suicide on them. And funnily enough, some antidepressants seemed to be correlated with a higher risk of committing suicide,” Markku Lähteenvuo, MD, PhD, said at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

However, he suspects that the correlation between antidepressant therapy and suicide in bipolar patients probably was caused by confounding by indication.

“I wouldn’t have as a take-home message that SSRI [selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor] antidepressants are bad for you; it’s probably rather that these are really bad cases, treatment gets initiated when someone gets worse, and the antidepressants just aren’t quick enough to really give an effect. It takes 3-4 weeks for an SSRI to really kick in, whereas mood stabilizers like lithium and valproic acid usually kick in almost immediately, within a couple of days to a week,” explained Dr. Lähteenvuo, a forensic psychiatrist at Niuvanniemi Hospital and the University of Eastern Finland, in Kuopio.

He presented a study of all suicides among the 18,018 Finnish patients hospitalized for bipolar disorder nationwide during 1996-2012. Using prospective national databases to follow patients for a mean of 7.2 years, he and his coinvestigators were able to determine what medications they were on when they committed suicide and the likelihood they were actually taking their prescribed medications at the time.


In a multivariate proportional hazards analysis adjusted for concomitant psychotropic medications, duration of bipolar illness, intervals of drug exposure and nonexposure, age, sex, and number of hospitalizations for suicidality within the prior 2 years, bipolar patients on lithium had a 67% lower risk of suicide than did those not on the drug. Those on valproic acid were 39% less likely to commit suicide than those not on that mood stabilizer. And bipolar patients on lithium were 42% less likely to die from suicide than those on valproic acid.

At the other extreme, patients on antidepressants were in aggregate 28% more likely to commit suicide than those who were not. This risk varied considerably according to the specific antidepressant: for example, escitalopram and mirtazapine were associated with 71% and 57% greater risks of suicide, respectively, than in patients not on those antidepressants, while patients on paroxetine, venlafaxine, or sertraline were not at increased risk.

Also, the use of sedatives was associated with a 52% greater likelihood of suicide, and benzodiazepines were linked to a 21% increase in risk. Again, as with antidepressants, these associations with increased risk of completed suicide could be attributable in part or in whole to confounding by indication, the psychiatrist noted. He and his colleagues are conducting further analyses examining that possibility.


Pending the outcome of that closer look, however, Dr. Lähteenvuo believes the study’s message to clinicians is clear: “The use of lithium is getting less and less common all the time because of side effects. That’s also true for valproic acid. Many bipolar patients are now prescribed only antidepressants, even though all the guidelines advise against it due to the risk of hypomania. We think that this is a bad trend and that lithium and valproic acid should be prescribed more. Also, as a safety precaution, anyone with bipolar disorder on antidepressants or benzodiazepines or sedatives should be followed especially closely for suicidal signals, because they could carry a really highly increased risk – up to 50% – due to the medication as well.”

He reported having no financial conflicts regarding the study, funded by the Finnish government.

Dr. Lähteenvuo also was first author of a recent study showing that among the various drugs prescribed for treatment of bipolar disorder, lithium was the clear winner for prevention of rehospitalization in the same national Finnish population of more than 18,000 bipolar patients (JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75[4]:347-55). One expert named this among the top four studies of the year in the field of mood disorders.

[email protected]

Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD)—a childhood condition of extreme irritability, anger, and frequent, intense temper outbursts—has been a source of controversy among clinicians in the field of pediatric mental health. Before DSM-5 was published, the validity of DMDD had been questioned because DMDD had failed a field trial; agreement between clinicians on the diagnosis of DMDD was poor.¹ Axelson² and Birmaher et al³ examined its validity in their COBY (Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth) sample. They concluded that only 19% met the criteria for DMDD in 3 times of follow-up. Furthermore, most DMDD criteria overlap with those of other common pediatric psychiatric disorders, including oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and pediatric bipolar disorder (BD). Because diagnosis of pediatric BD increased drastically from 2.9% to 15.1% between 1990 and 2000,⁴ it was believed that introducing DMDD as a diagnosis might lessen the overdiagnosis of pediatric BD by identifying children with chronic irritability and temper tantrums who previously would have been diagnosed with BD.

It is important to recognize that in pediatric patients, mood disorders present differently than they do in adults.⁵ In children/adolescents, mood disorders are less likely to present as distinct episodes (narrow band), but more likely to present as chronic, broad symptoms. Also, irritability is a common presentation in many pediatric psychiatric disorders, such as ODD, BD (irritability without elation),⁶ and depression. Thus, for many clinicians, determining the correct mood disorder diagnosis in pediatric patients can be challenging.

This article describes the diagnosis of DMDD, and how its presentation is similar to—and different from—those of other common pediatric psychiatric disorders.

_

The origin of DMDD

Many researchers have investigated the broadband phenotypical presentation of pediatric mood disorders, which have been mostly diagnosed in the psychiatric community as pediatric BD. Leibenluft⁷ identified a subtype of mood disorder that they termed “severe mood dysregulation” (SMD). Compared with the narrow-band, clearly episodic BD, SMD has a different trajectory, outcome, and findings on brain imaging. SMD is characterized by chronic irritability with abnormal mood (anger or sadness) at least half of the day on most days, with 3 hyperarousal symptoms, including pressured speech, racing thoughts or flight of ideas, intrusiveness, distractibility, insomnia, and agitation.⁸ Eventually, SMD became the foundation of the development of DMDD.

DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for DMDD include severe recurrent temper outbursts that are out of proportion to the situation, inconsistent with developmental level, and occurring on average ≥3 times per week, plus persistently irritable or angry mood for most of the day nearly every day.⁹ Additional criteria include the presence of symptoms for at least 12 months (without a symptom-free period of at least 3 consecutive months) in ≥2 settings (at home, at school, or with peers) with onset before age 10. The course of DMDD typically is chronic with accompanying severe temperament. The estimated 6-month to 1-year prevalence is 2% to 5%; the diagnosis is more common among males and school-age children than it is in females and adolescents.^9,10

_

DMDD or bipolar disorder?

A patient cannot be dually diagnosed with both disorders. If a patient exhibits a manic episode for more than 1 day, that would null and void the DMDD diagnosis. However, in a study to evaluate BD in pediatric patients, researchers divided BD symptoms into BD-specific categories (elevated mood, grandiosity, and increased goal-directed activity) and nonspecific symptoms such as irritability and talkativeness, distractibility, and flight of ideas or racing thoughts. They found that in the absence of specific symptoms, a diagnosis of BD is unlikely to be the correct diagnosis.¹¹ Hence, as a nonspecific symptom, chronic irritability should be attributed to the symptom count for DMDD, rather than BD. Most epidemiologic studies have concluded that depression and anxiety, and not irritability, are typically the preceeding presentations prior to the development of BD in young adults.¹² Chronic irritability, however, predicts major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders in later adolescence and one’s early twenties.¹³ Furthermore, BD commonly presents with infrequent and discrete episodes and a later age of onset, while DMDD presents with chronic and frequent, severe temper outbursts. Some differences between DMDD and BD are illustrated in Table 1.^11-13

Continue to: CASE 1

Ms. N, age 16, is brought to the outpatient psychiatry clinic by her parents for evaluation of mood symptoms, including irritability. Her mother claims her daughter was an introverted, anxious, shy child, but by the beginning of middle school, she began to feel irritable and frequently stayed up at night with little sleep. In high school, Ms. N had displayed several episodes of risk-taking behaviors, including taking her father’s vehicle for a drive despite not having a driver’s permit, running away for 2 days, and having unprotected sex.

During her assessment, Ms. N is pleasant and claims she usually has a great mood. She fought with her mother several times this year, which led her to run away. Her parents had divorced when Ms. N was 5 years old and have shared custody. Ms. N is doing well in school despite her parents’ concerns.

Diagnosis. The most likely diagnosis is emerging BD. Notice that Ms. N may have had anxiety symptoms before she developed irritability. She had a relatively late onset of symptoms that were episodic in nature, which further supports a diagnosis of BD.

_

>

DMDD or oppositional defiant disorder?

DMDD and ODD cannot be dually diagnosed. However, if a patient meets the criteria for both DMDD and ODD, only the DMDD diagnosis should be considered. One of many issues of DMDD is its similarity to ODD. In fact, more than 70% of patients with DMDD also meet the diagnostic criteria for ODD.^10,14 Some researchers have conceptualized DMDD as a severe form of ODD. However, there are a few differences that clinicians can use to distinguish the 2 disorders.

Compared with patients with ODD, those with DMDD more frequently experience severe irritability.¹⁵ Patients with ODD may present with delinquent behaviors and trouble with authority figures. Moreover, comorbidity with ADHD is twice as common in ODD; more than 65% of patients with ADHD have ODD vs 30% who have DMDD.^10,16 Finally, in general, children with DMDD have more social impairments compared with those with ODD. Differences between DMDD and BD are illustrated in Table 2.^10,14-16

Continue to: CASE 2

Mr. R, age 14, is brought to the emergency department (ED) by his parents after becoming very aggressive with them. He punched a wall and vandalized his room after his parents grounded him because of his previous defiant behavior. He had been suspended from school that day for disrespecting his teacher after he was caught fighting another student.

His parents describe Mr. R as a strong-willed, stubborn child. He has difficulty with rules and refuses to follow them. He is grouchy and irritable around adults, including the ED staff. Mr. R enjoys being with his friends and playing video games. He had been diagnosed with ADHD when he was in kindergarten, when his teacher noticed he had a poor attention span and could not sit still. According to his parents, Mr. R has “blown up” a few times before, smashing items in his room and shouting obscenities. Mr. R’s parents noticed that he is more defiant in concurrence with discontinuing his ADHD stimulant medication.

Diagnosis. The most likely diagnosis for Mr. R is ODD. Notice the comorbidity of ADHD, which is more commonly associated with ODD. The frequency and severity of his outbursts and irritability symptoms were lower than that typically associated with DMDD.

_

Treatment strategies for DMDD

Management of DMDD should focus on helping children and adolescents improve their emotional dysregulation.

Clinicians should always consider behavioral therapy as a first-line intervention. The behavioral planning team may include (but is not limited to) a behavior specialist, child psychiatrist, psychologist, therapist, skills trainer, teachers, and the caregiver(s). The plan should be implemented across all settings, including home and school. Furthermore, social skills training is necessary for many children with DMDD, who may require intensive behavioral modification planning. Comorbidity with ADHD should be addressed with a combination of behavioral planning and stimulant medications.¹⁷ If available, parent training and parent-child interactive therapy can help to improve defiant behavior.

Pharmacotherapy
Currently, no medications are FDA-approved for treating DMDD. Most pharmacologic trials that included patients with DMDD focused on managing chronic irritability and/or stabilizing comorbid disorders (ie, ADHD, depression, and anxiety).

Continue to: Stimulants

Stimulants. Previous trials examined the benefit of CNS stimulant medications, alone or in conjunction with behavioral therapy, in treating DMDD and comorbid ADHD. Methylphenidate results in a significant reduction in aggression¹⁸ with a dosing recommendation range from 1 to 1.2 mg/kg/d. CNS stimulants should be considered as first-line pharmacotherapy for DMDD, especially for patients with comorbid ADHD.

Anticonvulsants. Divalproex sodium is superior to placebo in treating aggression in children and adolescents.¹⁹ Trials found that divalproex sodium reduces irritability and aggression whether it is prescribed as monotherapy or combined with stimulant medications.¹⁹

Lithium is one of the main treatment options for mania in BD. The benefits of lithium for controlling aggression in DMDD are still under investigation. Earlier studies found that lithium significantly improves aggressive behavior in hospitalized pediatric with conduct disorder.^20,21 However, a later study that evaluated lithium vs placebo for children with SMD (which arguably is phenotypically related to the DMDD) found there were no significant differences in improvement of irritability symptoms between groups.²² More research is needed to determine if lithium may play a role in treating patients with DMDD.

Antipsychotics. Aripiprazole and risperidone are FDA-approved for treating irritability in autism. A 2017 meta-analysis found both medications were effective in controlling irritability and aggression in other diagnoses as well.²³ Other antipsychotic medications did not show sufficient benefits in treating irritability.²³ When considering antipsychotics, clinicians should weigh the risks of metabolic adverse effects and follow practice guidelines.

Antidepressants. A systematic review did not find that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors effectively reduce irritability.²⁴ However, in most of the studies evaluated, irritability was not the primary outcome measure.²⁴

Other medications. Alpha-2 agonists (guanfacine, clonidine), and atomoxetine may help irritability indirectly by improving ADHD symptoms.²⁵

Bottom Line

Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD), bipolar disorder, and oppositional defiant disorder have similar presentations and diagnostic criteria. The frequency and severity of irritability can be a distinguishing factor. Behavioral therapy is a first-line treatment. No medications are FDA-approved for treating DMDD, but pharmacotherapy may help reduce irritability and aggression.

Related Resources

• Rao U. DSM-5: disruptive mood dysregulation disorder. Asian J Psychiatr. 2014;11:119-123.
• Roy AK, Lopes V, Klein RG. Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a new diagnostic approach to chronic irritability in youth. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(9):918-924.

Drug Brand Names
Aripiprazole • Abilify
Atomoxetine • Strattera
Clonidine • Catapres
Divalproex sodium • Depakote, Depakote ER
Guanfacine • Intuniv, Tenex
Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid
Methylphenidate • Concerta, Ritalin
Risperidone • Risperdal

Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD)—a childhood condition of extreme irritability, anger, and frequent, intense temper outbursts—has been a source of controversy among clinicians in the field of pediatric mental health. Before DSM-5 was published, the validity of DMDD had been questioned because DMDD had failed a field trial; agreement between clinicians on the diagnosis of DMDD was poor.¹ Axelson² and Birmaher et al³ examined its validity in their COBY (Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth) sample. They concluded that only 19% met the criteria for DMDD in 3 times of follow-up. Furthermore, most DMDD criteria overlap with those of other common pediatric psychiatric disorders, including oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and pediatric bipolar disorder (BD). Because diagnosis of pediatric BD increased drastically from 2.9% to 15.1% between 1990 and 2000,⁴ it was believed that introducing DMDD as a diagnosis might lessen the overdiagnosis of pediatric BD by identifying children with chronic irritability and temper tantrums who previously would have been diagnosed with BD.

It is important to recognize that in pediatric patients, mood disorders present differently than they do in adults.⁵ In children/adolescents, mood disorders are less likely to present as distinct episodes (narrow band), but more likely to present as chronic, broad symptoms. Also, irritability is a common presentation in many pediatric psychiatric disorders, such as ODD, BD (irritability without elation),⁶ and depression. Thus, for many clinicians, determining the correct mood disorder diagnosis in pediatric patients can be challenging.

This article describes the diagnosis of DMDD, and how its presentation is similar to—and different from—those of other common pediatric psychiatric disorders.

_

The origin of DMDD

Many researchers have investigated the broadband phenotypical presentation of pediatric mood disorders, which have been mostly diagnosed in the psychiatric community as pediatric BD. Leibenluft⁷ identified a subtype of mood disorder that they termed “severe mood dysregulation” (SMD). Compared with the narrow-band, clearly episodic BD, SMD has a different trajectory, outcome, and findings on brain imaging. SMD is characterized by chronic irritability with abnormal mood (anger or sadness) at least half of the day on most days, with 3 hyperarousal symptoms, including pressured speech, racing thoughts or flight of ideas, intrusiveness, distractibility, insomnia, and agitation.⁸ Eventually, SMD became the foundation of the development of DMDD.

DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for DMDD include severe recurrent temper outbursts that are out of proportion to the situation, inconsistent with developmental level, and occurring on average ≥3 times per week, plus persistently irritable or angry mood for most of the day nearly every day.⁹ Additional criteria include the presence of symptoms for at least 12 months (without a symptom-free period of at least 3 consecutive months) in ≥2 settings (at home, at school, or with peers) with onset before age 10. The course of DMDD typically is chronic with accompanying severe temperament. The estimated 6-month to 1-year prevalence is 2% to 5%; the diagnosis is more common among males and school-age children than it is in females and adolescents.^9,10

_

DMDD or bipolar disorder?

A patient cannot be dually diagnosed with both disorders. If a patient exhibits a manic episode for more than 1 day, that would null and void the DMDD diagnosis. However, in a study to evaluate BD in pediatric patients, researchers divided BD symptoms into BD-specific categories (elevated mood, grandiosity, and increased goal-directed activity) and nonspecific symptoms such as irritability and talkativeness, distractibility, and flight of ideas or racing thoughts. They found that in the absence of specific symptoms, a diagnosis of BD is unlikely to be the correct diagnosis.¹¹ Hence, as a nonspecific symptom, chronic irritability should be attributed to the symptom count for DMDD, rather than BD. Most epidemiologic studies have concluded that depression and anxiety, and not irritability, are typically the preceeding presentations prior to the development of BD in young adults.¹² Chronic irritability, however, predicts major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders in later adolescence and one’s early twenties.¹³ Furthermore, BD commonly presents with infrequent and discrete episodes and a later age of onset, while DMDD presents with chronic and frequent, severe temper outbursts. Some differences between DMDD and BD are illustrated in Table 1.^11-13

Continue to: CASE 1

Ms. N, age 16, is brought to the outpatient psychiatry clinic by her parents for evaluation of mood symptoms, including irritability. Her mother claims her daughter was an introverted, anxious, shy child, but by the beginning of middle school, she began to feel irritable and frequently stayed up at night with little sleep. In high school, Ms. N had displayed several episodes of risk-taking behaviors, including taking her father’s vehicle for a drive despite not having a driver’s permit, running away for 2 days, and having unprotected sex.

During her assessment, Ms. N is pleasant and claims she usually has a great mood. She fought with her mother several times this year, which led her to run away. Her parents had divorced when Ms. N was 5 years old and have shared custody. Ms. N is doing well in school despite her parents’ concerns.

Diagnosis. The most likely diagnosis is emerging BD. Notice that Ms. N may have had anxiety symptoms before she developed irritability. She had a relatively late onset of symptoms that were episodic in nature, which further supports a diagnosis of BD.

_

>

DMDD or oppositional defiant disorder?

DMDD and ODD cannot be dually diagnosed. However, if a patient meets the criteria for both DMDD and ODD, only the DMDD diagnosis should be considered. One of many issues of DMDD is its similarity to ODD. In fact, more than 70% of patients with DMDD also meet the diagnostic criteria for ODD.^10,14 Some researchers have conceptualized DMDD as a severe form of ODD. However, there are a few differences that clinicians can use to distinguish the 2 disorders.

Compared with patients with ODD, those with DMDD more frequently experience severe irritability.¹⁵ Patients with ODD may present with delinquent behaviors and trouble with authority figures. Moreover, comorbidity with ADHD is twice as common in ODD; more than 65% of patients with ADHD have ODD vs 30% who have DMDD.^10,16 Finally, in general, children with DMDD have more social impairments compared with those with ODD. Differences between DMDD and BD are illustrated in Table 2.^10,14-16

Continue to: CASE 2

Mr. R, age 14, is brought to the emergency department (ED) by his parents after becoming very aggressive with them. He punched a wall and vandalized his room after his parents grounded him because of his previous defiant behavior. He had been suspended from school that day for disrespecting his teacher after he was caught fighting another student.

His parents describe Mr. R as a strong-willed, stubborn child. He has difficulty with rules and refuses to follow them. He is grouchy and irritable around adults, including the ED staff. Mr. R enjoys being with his friends and playing video games. He had been diagnosed with ADHD when he was in kindergarten, when his teacher noticed he had a poor attention span and could not sit still. According to his parents, Mr. R has “blown up” a few times before, smashing items in his room and shouting obscenities. Mr. R’s parents noticed that he is more defiant in concurrence with discontinuing his ADHD stimulant medication.

Diagnosis. The most likely diagnosis for Mr. R is ODD. Notice the comorbidity of ADHD, which is more commonly associated with ODD. The frequency and severity of his outbursts and irritability symptoms were lower than that typically associated with DMDD.

_

Treatment strategies for DMDD

Management of DMDD should focus on helping children and adolescents improve their emotional dysregulation.

Clinicians should always consider behavioral therapy as a first-line intervention. The behavioral planning team may include (but is not limited to) a behavior specialist, child psychiatrist, psychologist, therapist, skills trainer, teachers, and the caregiver(s). The plan should be implemented across all settings, including home and school. Furthermore, social skills training is necessary for many children with DMDD, who may require intensive behavioral modification planning. Comorbidity with ADHD should be addressed with a combination of behavioral planning and stimulant medications.¹⁷ If available, parent training and parent-child interactive therapy can help to improve defiant behavior.

Pharmacotherapy
Currently, no medications are FDA-approved for treating DMDD. Most pharmacologic trials that included patients with DMDD focused on managing chronic irritability and/or stabilizing comorbid disorders (ie, ADHD, depression, and anxiety).

Continue to: Stimulants

Stimulants. Previous trials examined the benefit of CNS stimulant medications, alone or in conjunction with behavioral therapy, in treating DMDD and comorbid ADHD. Methylphenidate results in a significant reduction in aggression¹⁸ with a dosing recommendation range from 1 to 1.2 mg/kg/d. CNS stimulants should be considered as first-line pharmacotherapy for DMDD, especially for patients with comorbid ADHD.

Anticonvulsants. Divalproex sodium is superior to placebo in treating aggression in children and adolescents.¹⁹ Trials found that divalproex sodium reduces irritability and aggression whether it is prescribed as monotherapy or combined with stimulant medications.¹⁹

Lithium is one of the main treatment options for mania in BD. The benefits of lithium for controlling aggression in DMDD are still under investigation. Earlier studies found that lithium significantly improves aggressive behavior in hospitalized pediatric with conduct disorder.^20,21 However, a later study that evaluated lithium vs placebo for children with SMD (which arguably is phenotypically related to the DMDD) found there were no significant differences in improvement of irritability symptoms between groups.²² More research is needed to determine if lithium may play a role in treating patients with DMDD.

Antipsychotics. Aripiprazole and risperidone are FDA-approved for treating irritability in autism. A 2017 meta-analysis found both medications were effective in controlling irritability and aggression in other diagnoses as well.²³ Other antipsychotic medications did not show sufficient benefits in treating irritability.²³ When considering antipsychotics, clinicians should weigh the risks of metabolic adverse effects and follow practice guidelines.

Antidepressants. A systematic review did not find that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors effectively reduce irritability.²⁴ However, in most of the studies evaluated, irritability was not the primary outcome measure.²⁴

Other medications. Alpha-2 agonists (guanfacine, clonidine), and atomoxetine may help irritability indirectly by improving ADHD symptoms.²⁵

Bottom Line

Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD), bipolar disorder, and oppositional defiant disorder have similar presentations and diagnostic criteria. The frequency and severity of irritability can be a distinguishing factor. Behavioral therapy is a first-line treatment. No medications are FDA-approved for treating DMDD, but pharmacotherapy may help reduce irritability and aggression.

Related Resources

• Rao U. DSM-5: disruptive mood dysregulation disorder. Asian J Psychiatr. 2014;11:119-123.
• Roy AK, Lopes V, Klein RG. Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a new diagnostic approach to chronic irritability in youth. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(9):918-924.

Drug Brand Names
Aripiprazole • Abilify
Atomoxetine • Strattera
Clonidine • Catapres
Divalproex sodium • Depakote, Depakote ER
Guanfacine • Intuniv, Tenex
Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid
Methylphenidate • Concerta, Ritalin
Risperidone • Risperdal

Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD)—a childhood condition of extreme irritability, anger, and frequent, intense temper outbursts—has been a source of controversy among clinicians in the field of pediatric mental health. Before DSM-5 was published, the validity of DMDD had been questioned because DMDD had failed a field trial; agreement between clinicians on the diagnosis of DMDD was poor.¹ Axelson² and Birmaher et al³ examined its validity in their COBY (Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth) sample. They concluded that only 19% met the criteria for DMDD in 3 times of follow-up. Furthermore, most DMDD criteria overlap with those of other common pediatric psychiatric disorders, including oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and pediatric bipolar disorder (BD). Because diagnosis of pediatric BD increased drastically from 2.9% to 15.1% between 1990 and 2000,⁴ it was believed that introducing DMDD as a diagnosis might lessen the overdiagnosis of pediatric BD by identifying children with chronic irritability and temper tantrums who previously would have been diagnosed with BD.

It is important to recognize that in pediatric patients, mood disorders present differently than they do in adults.⁵ In children/adolescents, mood disorders are less likely to present as distinct episodes (narrow band), but more likely to present as chronic, broad symptoms. Also, irritability is a common presentation in many pediatric psychiatric disorders, such as ODD, BD (irritability without elation),⁶ and depression. Thus, for many clinicians, determining the correct mood disorder diagnosis in pediatric patients can be challenging.

This article describes the diagnosis of DMDD, and how its presentation is similar to—and different from—those of other common pediatric psychiatric disorders.

_

The origin of DMDD

Many researchers have investigated the broadband phenotypical presentation of pediatric mood disorders, which have been mostly diagnosed in the psychiatric community as pediatric BD. Leibenluft⁷ identified a subtype of mood disorder that they termed “severe mood dysregulation” (SMD). Compared with the narrow-band, clearly episodic BD, SMD has a different trajectory, outcome, and findings on brain imaging. SMD is characterized by chronic irritability with abnormal mood (anger or sadness) at least half of the day on most days, with 3 hyperarousal symptoms, including pressured speech, racing thoughts or flight of ideas, intrusiveness, distractibility, insomnia, and agitation.⁸ Eventually, SMD became the foundation of the development of DMDD.

DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for DMDD include severe recurrent temper outbursts that are out of proportion to the situation, inconsistent with developmental level, and occurring on average ≥3 times per week, plus persistently irritable or angry mood for most of the day nearly every day.⁹ Additional criteria include the presence of symptoms for at least 12 months (without a symptom-free period of at least 3 consecutive months) in ≥2 settings (at home, at school, or with peers) with onset before age 10. The course of DMDD typically is chronic with accompanying severe temperament. The estimated 6-month to 1-year prevalence is 2% to 5%; the diagnosis is more common among males and school-age children than it is in females and adolescents.^9,10

_

DMDD or bipolar disorder?

A patient cannot be dually diagnosed with both disorders. If a patient exhibits a manic episode for more than 1 day, that would null and void the DMDD diagnosis. However, in a study to evaluate BD in pediatric patients, researchers divided BD symptoms into BD-specific categories (elevated mood, grandiosity, and increased goal-directed activity) and nonspecific symptoms such as irritability and talkativeness, distractibility, and flight of ideas or racing thoughts. They found that in the absence of specific symptoms, a diagnosis of BD is unlikely to be the correct diagnosis.¹¹ Hence, as a nonspecific symptom, chronic irritability should be attributed to the symptom count for DMDD, rather than BD. Most epidemiologic studies have concluded that depression and anxiety, and not irritability, are typically the preceeding presentations prior to the development of BD in young adults.¹² Chronic irritability, however, predicts major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders in later adolescence and one’s early twenties.¹³ Furthermore, BD commonly presents with infrequent and discrete episodes and a later age of onset, while DMDD presents with chronic and frequent, severe temper outbursts. Some differences between DMDD and BD are illustrated in Table 1.^11-13

Continue to: CASE 1

Ms. N, age 16, is brought to the outpatient psychiatry clinic by her parents for evaluation of mood symptoms, including irritability. Her mother claims her daughter was an introverted, anxious, shy child, but by the beginning of middle school, she began to feel irritable and frequently stayed up at night with little sleep. In high school, Ms. N had displayed several episodes of risk-taking behaviors, including taking her father’s vehicle for a drive despite not having a driver’s permit, running away for 2 days, and having unprotected sex.

During her assessment, Ms. N is pleasant and claims she usually has a great mood. She fought with her mother several times this year, which led her to run away. Her parents had divorced when Ms. N was 5 years old and have shared custody. Ms. N is doing well in school despite her parents’ concerns.

Diagnosis. The most likely diagnosis is emerging BD. Notice that Ms. N may have had anxiety symptoms before she developed irritability. She had a relatively late onset of symptoms that were episodic in nature, which further supports a diagnosis of BD.

_

>

DMDD or oppositional defiant disorder?

DMDD and ODD cannot be dually diagnosed. However, if a patient meets the criteria for both DMDD and ODD, only the DMDD diagnosis should be considered. One of many issues of DMDD is its similarity to ODD. In fact, more than 70% of patients with DMDD also meet the diagnostic criteria for ODD.^10,14 Some researchers have conceptualized DMDD as a severe form of ODD. However, there are a few differences that clinicians can use to distinguish the 2 disorders.

Compared with patients with ODD, those with DMDD more frequently experience severe irritability.¹⁵ Patients with ODD may present with delinquent behaviors and trouble with authority figures. Moreover, comorbidity with ADHD is twice as common in ODD; more than 65% of patients with ADHD have ODD vs 30% who have DMDD.^10,16 Finally, in general, children with DMDD have more social impairments compared with those with ODD. Differences between DMDD and BD are illustrated in Table 2.^10,14-16

Continue to: CASE 2

Mr. R, age 14, is brought to the emergency department (ED) by his parents after becoming very aggressive with them. He punched a wall and vandalized his room after his parents grounded him because of his previous defiant behavior. He had been suspended from school that day for disrespecting his teacher after he was caught fighting another student.

His parents describe Mr. R as a strong-willed, stubborn child. He has difficulty with rules and refuses to follow them. He is grouchy and irritable around adults, including the ED staff. Mr. R enjoys being with his friends and playing video games. He had been diagnosed with ADHD when he was in kindergarten, when his teacher noticed he had a poor attention span and could not sit still. According to his parents, Mr. R has “blown up” a few times before, smashing items in his room and shouting obscenities. Mr. R’s parents noticed that he is more defiant in concurrence with discontinuing his ADHD stimulant medication.

Diagnosis. The most likely diagnosis for Mr. R is ODD. Notice the comorbidity of ADHD, which is more commonly associated with ODD. The frequency and severity of his outbursts and irritability symptoms were lower than that typically associated with DMDD.

_

Treatment strategies for DMDD

Management of DMDD should focus on helping children and adolescents improve their emotional dysregulation.

Clinicians should always consider behavioral therapy as a first-line intervention. The behavioral planning team may include (but is not limited to) a behavior specialist, child psychiatrist, psychologist, therapist, skills trainer, teachers, and the caregiver(s). The plan should be implemented across all settings, including home and school. Furthermore, social skills training is necessary for many children with DMDD, who may require intensive behavioral modification planning. Comorbidity with ADHD should be addressed with a combination of behavioral planning and stimulant medications.¹⁷ If available, parent training and parent-child interactive therapy can help to improve defiant behavior.

Pharmacotherapy
Currently, no medications are FDA-approved for treating DMDD. Most pharmacologic trials that included patients with DMDD focused on managing chronic irritability and/or stabilizing comorbid disorders (ie, ADHD, depression, and anxiety).

Continue to: Stimulants

Stimulants. Previous trials examined the benefit of CNS stimulant medications, alone or in conjunction with behavioral therapy, in treating DMDD and comorbid ADHD. Methylphenidate results in a significant reduction in aggression¹⁸ with a dosing recommendation range from 1 to 1.2 mg/kg/d. CNS stimulants should be considered as first-line pharmacotherapy for DMDD, especially for patients with comorbid ADHD.

Anticonvulsants. Divalproex sodium is superior to placebo in treating aggression in children and adolescents.¹⁹ Trials found that divalproex sodium reduces irritability and aggression whether it is prescribed as monotherapy or combined with stimulant medications.¹⁹

Lithium is one of the main treatment options for mania in BD. The benefits of lithium for controlling aggression in DMDD are still under investigation. Earlier studies found that lithium significantly improves aggressive behavior in hospitalized pediatric with conduct disorder.^20,21 However, a later study that evaluated lithium vs placebo for children with SMD (which arguably is phenotypically related to the DMDD) found there were no significant differences in improvement of irritability symptoms between groups.²² More research is needed to determine if lithium may play a role in treating patients with DMDD.

Antipsychotics. Aripiprazole and risperidone are FDA-approved for treating irritability in autism. A 2017 meta-analysis found both medications were effective in controlling irritability and aggression in other diagnoses as well.²³ Other antipsychotic medications did not show sufficient benefits in treating irritability.²³ When considering antipsychotics, clinicians should weigh the risks of metabolic adverse effects and follow practice guidelines.

Antidepressants. A systematic review did not find that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors effectively reduce irritability.²⁴ However, in most of the studies evaluated, irritability was not the primary outcome measure.²⁴

Other medications. Alpha-2 agonists (guanfacine, clonidine), and atomoxetine may help irritability indirectly by improving ADHD symptoms.²⁵

Bottom Line

Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD), bipolar disorder, and oppositional defiant disorder have similar presentations and diagnostic criteria. The frequency and severity of irritability can be a distinguishing factor. Behavioral therapy is a first-line treatment. No medications are FDA-approved for treating DMDD, but pharmacotherapy may help reduce irritability and aggression.

Related Resources

• Rao U. DSM-5: disruptive mood dysregulation disorder. Asian J Psychiatr. 2014;11:119-123.
• Roy AK, Lopes V, Klein RG. Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a new diagnostic approach to chronic irritability in youth. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(9):918-924.

Drug Brand Names
Aripiprazole • Abilify
Atomoxetine • Strattera
Clonidine • Catapres
Divalproex sodium • Depakote, Depakote ER
Guanfacine • Intuniv, Tenex
Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid
Methylphenidate • Concerta, Ritalin
Risperidone • Risperdal

Bright light therapy (BLT) refers to the use of bright light to treat symptoms of depression. BLT was initially prescribed as a treatment for patients with seasonal affective disorder.¹ It was later found helpful for nonseasonal depression,² premenstrual dysphoric disorder, postpartum depression, and phase shift circadian disorders, including for patients with dementia whose cognitive function improved after treatment with BLT.³ More recent studies suggest year-round benefit for nonseasonal depression.² The American Psychiatric Association practice guidelines for the treatment of depression list BLT as an alternative and/or addition to pharmacologic and psychological treatment.⁴ BLT also may be beneficial for patients who are in the depressive phase of bipolar illness.

This article describes the evidence, rationale for use, mechanism of action, benefits, and safety profile of BLT for treating patients with bipolar depression.

Circadian rhythm disruption in bipolar disorder

Clinical manifestation. Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) spend more time in depression than in mania.⁵ Sleep disturbance is a core symptom of BD; patients typically have little need for sleep during a manic episode, and excess sleepiness during a depressive episode. Sleep complaints can be both precipitating factors and consequences of mood disorders. Patients with seasonal depression have excess sleepiness and weight gain in the winter followed by hypomanic-like symptoms in the spring, including decreased need for sleep and weight loss with psychomotor activation. In a recent review of sleep problems in patients with BD, Steinan et al⁶ reported that 20% of patients with euthymic mood in bipolar disorder experience a sleep disorder. Circadian disruption and “eveningness” (being more active during the evening) have been associated with mood episodes, functional impairment, poor quality of life, and treatment resistance.^7-10

Pathophysiology. Existing hypotheses for the biological mechanism underlying dysregulation of circadian rhythm in BD include changes in melatonin levels, expression of melatonin receptors in the CNS, and daily cortisol profiles.¹¹ Genetic evidence also links circadian rhythm dysregulation with BD. Two polymorphisms on the circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (CLOCK) gene that control circadian rhythm—aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like (ARNTL) and timeless circadian clock (TIMELESS)—have been linked to lithium responsiveness in BD.¹² In addition, Per2, Cry1, and Rev-Erbα expression—all components of the circadian clock—have been found to increase individual susceptibility to the therapeutic effects of lithium in mice.¹³ In addition, circadian rhythm dysregulation is associated with metabolic problems encountered by patients with BD, including weight gain, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease.¹⁴

Rationale for use

Regulation of a patient’s circadian rhythm disruption is a potential treatment for BD. Hashimoto et al¹⁵ demonstrated that midday bright light exposure can phase advance and increase the amplitude of nocturnal melatonin production in healthy individuals. Morning light therapy has been shown to increase blood serotonin throughout the day in both healthy individuals and in patients with nonseasonal depression; the effect was apparent with light intensities as low as 50 lux.¹⁶ Lithium may exert its therapeutic effect through its influence on the retino-hypothalamic-pineal tract and thus its effect on melatonin secretion.¹⁷

BLT is a logical choice to treat the depression phase of BD when exposure to sunlight is not feasible due to geographical location, season, or other factor. For patients who live in areas that receive frequent sunshine, an outside stroll for half an hour will likely achieve similar benefit to BLT.

The precise mechanism of action of BLT for bipolar depression has not yet been determined. It may be attributed to a phase-resetting effect via melanopsin and the suprachiasmatic nucleus (Box^18-24).

Continue to: BLT for BD...

Several studies and case reports have evaluated the use of BLT for bipolar depression. The number of participants in these studies is small, and there is no uniformity of methodology or patient selection.

Dauphinais et al (2012)²⁵ randomly assigned 44 patients with bipolar depression to BLT or a high-density or low-density negative ion generator for 8 weeks. They reported no difference in outcome between the various groups (50% vs 55.6%, remission and response rate). Only one patient in each group showed a switch to hypomania.

Carmadese et al (2015)²⁶ reported an open-label study of adjunctive BLT in 31 difficult-to-treat patients with depression (16 unipolar and 15 bipolar). Significant improvement was noted within 3 weeks and was sustained in 1 patient with bipolar depression 5 weeks after cessation of BLT.

Papatheodorou and Kutcher (1995)²⁷ treated 7 adolescents with bipolar depression with adjunctive BLT (10,000 lux twice per day). Three patients showed a marked response (>70% decrease from baseline Beck Depression Inventory and Symptom Check List scores). Two patients had a moderate response (40% to 47% decrease) and 2 patients obtained mild to no response. There were no reported adverse effects.

Benedetti et al (2014)²⁸ studied 141 patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Approximately one-quarter (23%) had a history of attempted suicide, and 83% had a history of drug resistance. The authors found a combination of total sleep deprivation, BLT, and lithium rapidly decreased suicidality and improved patients’ depressive symptoms.

Liebenluft et al (1995)²⁹ administered 13 trials of BLT to 9 patients with rapid-cycling BD during a 3-month period. Five patients received the treatment in the morning, 5 around midday, and 3 in the evening. Patients who received BLT at midday had the best outcome, while 3 of the 5 patients who received morning BLT developed unstable mood. The authors recommended titrating the duration of light exposure so that patients could skip a treatment if their mood was trending toward hypomania.

Sit et al (2007)³⁰ evaluated BLT in a case series of 9 women with bipolar I or II disorder in the depression phase. Patients were exposed to 50 lux of red light for 2 weeks, and then they received 7,000 lux BLT for 15, 30, and 45 minutes daily for 2 weeks (4 patients received morning light and 5 received midday light). Mood was assessed using the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale with Atypical Depression Supplement and the Mania Rating Scale. Of the 4 patients receiving morning BLT, one patient had a full response and the other 3 developed hypomania. Of the 5 patients who received midday BLT, 2 achieved full response, 2 showed early improvement but required a dose increase, and one remained depressed but had a full response when she was switched to morning BLT.

Tseng et al (2016)³¹ reported a meta-analysis of BLT for bipolar depression that included a total of 567 patients from 11 studies. They reported significant improvement with BLT alone or in combination with antidepressants or total sleep deprivation. They also reported significant improvement with BLT in 130 patients who were not receiving other treatments. There was no difference in the frequency of mood shifts between patients on BLT alone or in combination with other modalities. The authors reported no mood shift in any of the patients receiving concurrent mood stabilizers. They also reported no difference with the color of light, gender, or duration of illness.

Yorguner et al (2017)³² conducted a 2-week randomized, single-blind study of BLT as an add-on treatment for 32 patients with bipolar depression. Patients were randomly assigned to BLT or dim light, which they were administered each morning for 30 mins for 2 weeks. Sixteen patients who received BLT showed a significantly greater reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores (mean score of 24 at baseline down to 12) compared with 16 patients who received dim light (mean score of 24 at baseline down to 18). The authors also reported remission in 4 out of 4 patients who had seasonal depression, compared with 3 out of 12 who did not have seasonal depression (the other 9 showed response but not remission).

Zhou et al (2018)³³ conducted a multi-center, randomized, single-blind clinical trial of 63 patients with bipolar depression. Thirty-three patients received morning BLT, and 30 received dim red light therapy (control group). The authors reported a significantly higher response rate in the BLT group (78%) compared with the control group (43%).

Sit et al (2018)³⁴ conducted a 6-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of BLT vs dim red light in patients with bipolar I or II depression. Twenty-three patients were administered 7,000 lux bright white light, and 23 patients received 50 lux dim red light, at midday 5 days a week. The light dose was increased by 15 minutes every week up to 60 minutes by Week 4, unless the patient achieved remission. Patients were maintained on their usual medications, which included mood stabilizers and/or antidepressants. At Week 6, the group randomized to BLT had a significantly higher remission rate (68%) compared with patients who received dim red light (22%). Improvement was noted by Week 4. Patients receiving BLT also had significantly fewer depressive symptoms, and no mood polarity switch was noted.

Light box selection criteria. When selecting a light box or related BLT treatment apparatus, the Center for Environmental Therapeutics recommends consideration of the following factors³⁵:

• clinical efficacy
• ocular and dermatologic safety
• visual comfort.

The intensity of the light hitting the cornea depends on the distance from the light. In our experience, when the patient is facing the box it should provide 10,000 lux when he or she is 1 foot away at approximately a 45° angle (1 lux = 1 lumen per square meter). The light box selected should emit full spectrum white light with UV filter. The newest filters use LED, which is less expensive and more durable. Typically, we’ve found that it is most convenient for patients to use the light box in the morning before 9 am, but around noon is preferred for patients with BD. If using a light box is not feasible, we suggest the use of dawn light by the bedside before waking in the morning. Again, it is preferable to get some sunshine outdoors while taking a walk as long as geographical location and weather conditions permit.

Selecting a dose. The dose received is determined by the intensity emitted from the light source, distance from the light box, and duration of exposure.³⁶ Begin with midday light therapy between 12 noon and 2 pm at a daily dose of 15 minutes, and increase by 15 minutes every 2 weeks until the patient has achieved a euthymic mood.³⁴ Patients need not stare directly into the light source as long as the light is able to meet the eye at an angle of 30° to 60°.³⁵ The upper limit of midday light is 45 to 60 minutes, beyond which patients are more likely to have difficulty with adherence. Because morning BLT also may be effective, consider a change to morning light at a starting dose of 15 minutes for patients who respond partially or minimally to 45 to 60 mins of midday light, then increase it every week by an additional 7 to 15 mins.³⁵ For patients who respond to BLT, it is reasonable to continue light therapy for 12 months after remission to prevent relapses, similar to the recommendations for antidepressant therapy.³⁴

Monitor for adverse effects. Generally, BLT is well tolerated.³⁷ Adverse effects are rare; the most common ones include headache, eyestrain, nausea, and agitation.³⁸ One study found no adverse ocular effects from light therapy after 5 years of treatment.³⁹ Adverse effects tend to remit spontaneously or after dose reduction.³⁵ Evening administration of BLT may increase the incidence of sleep disturbances.⁴⁰ Like other biologic treatments for bipolar depression, BLT can precipitate manic/hypomanic and mixed states in susceptible patients, although the light dose can be titrated against emergent symptoms of hypomania.⁴¹

Bottom Line

Evidence suggests that bright light therapy is an effective, well tolerated, and affordable adjunct treatment for bipolar depression. Exposure to 5,000 to 7,000 lux around noon for 15 to 60 minutes will enhance the remission rate.

Related Resource

Mostert M, Dubovsky S. When bipolar treatment fails: what’s your next step? Current Psychiatry. 2008;7(1):39-46.

Drug Brand Name
Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid

Bright light therapy (BLT) refers to the use of bright light to treat symptoms of depression. BLT was initially prescribed as a treatment for patients with seasonal affective disorder.¹ It was later found helpful for nonseasonal depression,² premenstrual dysphoric disorder, postpartum depression, and phase shift circadian disorders, including for patients with dementia whose cognitive function improved after treatment with BLT.³ More recent studies suggest year-round benefit for nonseasonal depression.² The American Psychiatric Association practice guidelines for the treatment of depression list BLT as an alternative and/or addition to pharmacologic and psychological treatment.⁴ BLT also may be beneficial for patients who are in the depressive phase of bipolar illness.

This article describes the evidence, rationale for use, mechanism of action, benefits, and safety profile of BLT for treating patients with bipolar depression.

Circadian rhythm disruption in bipolar disorder

Clinical manifestation. Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) spend more time in depression than in mania.⁵ Sleep disturbance is a core symptom of BD; patients typically have little need for sleep during a manic episode, and excess sleepiness during a depressive episode. Sleep complaints can be both precipitating factors and consequences of mood disorders. Patients with seasonal depression have excess sleepiness and weight gain in the winter followed by hypomanic-like symptoms in the spring, including decreased need for sleep and weight loss with psychomotor activation. In a recent review of sleep problems in patients with BD, Steinan et al⁶ reported that 20% of patients with euthymic mood in bipolar disorder experience a sleep disorder. Circadian disruption and “eveningness” (being more active during the evening) have been associated with mood episodes, functional impairment, poor quality of life, and treatment resistance.^7-10

Pathophysiology. Existing hypotheses for the biological mechanism underlying dysregulation of circadian rhythm in BD include changes in melatonin levels, expression of melatonin receptors in the CNS, and daily cortisol profiles.¹¹ Genetic evidence also links circadian rhythm dysregulation with BD. Two polymorphisms on the circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (CLOCK) gene that control circadian rhythm—aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like (ARNTL) and timeless circadian clock (TIMELESS)—have been linked to lithium responsiveness in BD.¹² In addition, Per2, Cry1, and Rev-Erbα expression—all components of the circadian clock—have been found to increase individual susceptibility to the therapeutic effects of lithium in mice.¹³ In addition, circadian rhythm dysregulation is associated with metabolic problems encountered by patients with BD, including weight gain, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease.¹⁴

Rationale for use

Regulation of a patient’s circadian rhythm disruption is a potential treatment for BD. Hashimoto et al¹⁵ demonstrated that midday bright light exposure can phase advance and increase the amplitude of nocturnal melatonin production in healthy individuals. Morning light therapy has been shown to increase blood serotonin throughout the day in both healthy individuals and in patients with nonseasonal depression; the effect was apparent with light intensities as low as 50 lux.¹⁶ Lithium may exert its therapeutic effect through its influence on the retino-hypothalamic-pineal tract and thus its effect on melatonin secretion.¹⁷

BLT is a logical choice to treat the depression phase of BD when exposure to sunlight is not feasible due to geographical location, season, or other factor. For patients who live in areas that receive frequent sunshine, an outside stroll for half an hour will likely achieve similar benefit to BLT.

The precise mechanism of action of BLT for bipolar depression has not yet been determined. It may be attributed to a phase-resetting effect via melanopsin and the suprachiasmatic nucleus (Box^18-24).

Continue to: BLT for BD...

Several studies and case reports have evaluated the use of BLT for bipolar depression. The number of participants in these studies is small, and there is no uniformity of methodology or patient selection.

Dauphinais et al (2012)²⁵ randomly assigned 44 patients with bipolar depression to BLT or a high-density or low-density negative ion generator for 8 weeks. They reported no difference in outcome between the various groups (50% vs 55.6%, remission and response rate). Only one patient in each group showed a switch to hypomania.

Carmadese et al (2015)²⁶ reported an open-label study of adjunctive BLT in 31 difficult-to-treat patients with depression (16 unipolar and 15 bipolar). Significant improvement was noted within 3 weeks and was sustained in 1 patient with bipolar depression 5 weeks after cessation of BLT.

Papatheodorou and Kutcher (1995)²⁷ treated 7 adolescents with bipolar depression with adjunctive BLT (10,000 lux twice per day). Three patients showed a marked response (>70% decrease from baseline Beck Depression Inventory and Symptom Check List scores). Two patients had a moderate response (40% to 47% decrease) and 2 patients obtained mild to no response. There were no reported adverse effects.

Benedetti et al (2014)²⁸ studied 141 patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Approximately one-quarter (23%) had a history of attempted suicide, and 83% had a history of drug resistance. The authors found a combination of total sleep deprivation, BLT, and lithium rapidly decreased suicidality and improved patients’ depressive symptoms.

Liebenluft et al (1995)²⁹ administered 13 trials of BLT to 9 patients with rapid-cycling BD during a 3-month period. Five patients received the treatment in the morning, 5 around midday, and 3 in the evening. Patients who received BLT at midday had the best outcome, while 3 of the 5 patients who received morning BLT developed unstable mood. The authors recommended titrating the duration of light exposure so that patients could skip a treatment if their mood was trending toward hypomania.

Sit et al (2007)³⁰ evaluated BLT in a case series of 9 women with bipolar I or II disorder in the depression phase. Patients were exposed to 50 lux of red light for 2 weeks, and then they received 7,000 lux BLT for 15, 30, and 45 minutes daily for 2 weeks (4 patients received morning light and 5 received midday light). Mood was assessed using the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale with Atypical Depression Supplement and the Mania Rating Scale. Of the 4 patients receiving morning BLT, one patient had a full response and the other 3 developed hypomania. Of the 5 patients who received midday BLT, 2 achieved full response, 2 showed early improvement but required a dose increase, and one remained depressed but had a full response when she was switched to morning BLT.

Tseng et al (2016)³¹ reported a meta-analysis of BLT for bipolar depression that included a total of 567 patients from 11 studies. They reported significant improvement with BLT alone or in combination with antidepressants or total sleep deprivation. They also reported significant improvement with BLT in 130 patients who were not receiving other treatments. There was no difference in the frequency of mood shifts between patients on BLT alone or in combination with other modalities. The authors reported no mood shift in any of the patients receiving concurrent mood stabilizers. They also reported no difference with the color of light, gender, or duration of illness.

Yorguner et al (2017)³² conducted a 2-week randomized, single-blind study of BLT as an add-on treatment for 32 patients with bipolar depression. Patients were randomly assigned to BLT or dim light, which they were administered each morning for 30 mins for 2 weeks. Sixteen patients who received BLT showed a significantly greater reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores (mean score of 24 at baseline down to 12) compared with 16 patients who received dim light (mean score of 24 at baseline down to 18). The authors also reported remission in 4 out of 4 patients who had seasonal depression, compared with 3 out of 12 who did not have seasonal depression (the other 9 showed response but not remission).

Zhou et al (2018)³³ conducted a multi-center, randomized, single-blind clinical trial of 63 patients with bipolar depression. Thirty-three patients received morning BLT, and 30 received dim red light therapy (control group). The authors reported a significantly higher response rate in the BLT group (78%) compared with the control group (43%).

Sit et al (2018)³⁴ conducted a 6-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of BLT vs dim red light in patients with bipolar I or II depression. Twenty-three patients were administered 7,000 lux bright white light, and 23 patients received 50 lux dim red light, at midday 5 days a week. The light dose was increased by 15 minutes every week up to 60 minutes by Week 4, unless the patient achieved remission. Patients were maintained on their usual medications, which included mood stabilizers and/or antidepressants. At Week 6, the group randomized to BLT had a significantly higher remission rate (68%) compared with patients who received dim red light (22%). Improvement was noted by Week 4. Patients receiving BLT also had significantly fewer depressive symptoms, and no mood polarity switch was noted.

Light box selection criteria. When selecting a light box or related BLT treatment apparatus, the Center for Environmental Therapeutics recommends consideration of the following factors³⁵:

• clinical efficacy
• ocular and dermatologic safety
• visual comfort.

The intensity of the light hitting the cornea depends on the distance from the light. In our experience, when the patient is facing the box it should provide 10,000 lux when he or she is 1 foot away at approximately a 45° angle (1 lux = 1 lumen per square meter). The light box selected should emit full spectrum white light with UV filter. The newest filters use LED, which is less expensive and more durable. Typically, we’ve found that it is most convenient for patients to use the light box in the morning before 9 am, but around noon is preferred for patients with BD. If using a light box is not feasible, we suggest the use of dawn light by the bedside before waking in the morning. Again, it is preferable to get some sunshine outdoors while taking a walk as long as geographical location and weather conditions permit.

Selecting a dose. The dose received is determined by the intensity emitted from the light source, distance from the light box, and duration of exposure.³⁶ Begin with midday light therapy between 12 noon and 2 pm at a daily dose of 15 minutes, and increase by 15 minutes every 2 weeks until the patient has achieved a euthymic mood.³⁴ Patients need not stare directly into the light source as long as the light is able to meet the eye at an angle of 30° to 60°.³⁵ The upper limit of midday light is 45 to 60 minutes, beyond which patients are more likely to have difficulty with adherence. Because morning BLT also may be effective, consider a change to morning light at a starting dose of 15 minutes for patients who respond partially or minimally to 45 to 60 mins of midday light, then increase it every week by an additional 7 to 15 mins.³⁵ For patients who respond to BLT, it is reasonable to continue light therapy for 12 months after remission to prevent relapses, similar to the recommendations for antidepressant therapy.³⁴

Monitor for adverse effects. Generally, BLT is well tolerated.³⁷ Adverse effects are rare; the most common ones include headache, eyestrain, nausea, and agitation.³⁸ One study found no adverse ocular effects from light therapy after 5 years of treatment.³⁹ Adverse effects tend to remit spontaneously or after dose reduction.³⁵ Evening administration of BLT may increase the incidence of sleep disturbances.⁴⁰ Like other biologic treatments for bipolar depression, BLT can precipitate manic/hypomanic and mixed states in susceptible patients, although the light dose can be titrated against emergent symptoms of hypomania.⁴¹

Bottom Line

Evidence suggests that bright light therapy is an effective, well tolerated, and affordable adjunct treatment for bipolar depression. Exposure to 5,000 to 7,000 lux around noon for 15 to 60 minutes will enhance the remission rate.

Related Resource

Mostert M, Dubovsky S. When bipolar treatment fails: what’s your next step? Current Psychiatry. 2008;7(1):39-46.

Drug Brand Name
Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid

Bright light therapy (BLT) refers to the use of bright light to treat symptoms of depression. BLT was initially prescribed as a treatment for patients with seasonal affective disorder.¹ It was later found helpful for nonseasonal depression,² premenstrual dysphoric disorder, postpartum depression, and phase shift circadian disorders, including for patients with dementia whose cognitive function improved after treatment with BLT.³ More recent studies suggest year-round benefit for nonseasonal depression.² The American Psychiatric Association practice guidelines for the treatment of depression list BLT as an alternative and/or addition to pharmacologic and psychological treatment.⁴ BLT also may be beneficial for patients who are in the depressive phase of bipolar illness.

This article describes the evidence, rationale for use, mechanism of action, benefits, and safety profile of BLT for treating patients with bipolar depression.

Circadian rhythm disruption in bipolar disorder

Clinical manifestation. Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) spend more time in depression than in mania.⁵ Sleep disturbance is a core symptom of BD; patients typically have little need for sleep during a manic episode, and excess sleepiness during a depressive episode. Sleep complaints can be both precipitating factors and consequences of mood disorders. Patients with seasonal depression have excess sleepiness and weight gain in the winter followed by hypomanic-like symptoms in the spring, including decreased need for sleep and weight loss with psychomotor activation. In a recent review of sleep problems in patients with BD, Steinan et al⁶ reported that 20% of patients with euthymic mood in bipolar disorder experience a sleep disorder. Circadian disruption and “eveningness” (being more active during the evening) have been associated with mood episodes, functional impairment, poor quality of life, and treatment resistance.^7-10

Pathophysiology. Existing hypotheses for the biological mechanism underlying dysregulation of circadian rhythm in BD include changes in melatonin levels, expression of melatonin receptors in the CNS, and daily cortisol profiles.¹¹ Genetic evidence also links circadian rhythm dysregulation with BD. Two polymorphisms on the circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (CLOCK) gene that control circadian rhythm—aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like (ARNTL) and timeless circadian clock (TIMELESS)—have been linked to lithium responsiveness in BD.¹² In addition, Per2, Cry1, and Rev-Erbα expression—all components of the circadian clock—have been found to increase individual susceptibility to the therapeutic effects of lithium in mice.¹³ In addition, circadian rhythm dysregulation is associated with metabolic problems encountered by patients with BD, including weight gain, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease.¹⁴

Rationale for use

Regulation of a patient’s circadian rhythm disruption is a potential treatment for BD. Hashimoto et al¹⁵ demonstrated that midday bright light exposure can phase advance and increase the amplitude of nocturnal melatonin production in healthy individuals. Morning light therapy has been shown to increase blood serotonin throughout the day in both healthy individuals and in patients with nonseasonal depression; the effect was apparent with light intensities as low as 50 lux.¹⁶ Lithium may exert its therapeutic effect through its influence on the retino-hypothalamic-pineal tract and thus its effect on melatonin secretion.¹⁷

BLT is a logical choice to treat the depression phase of BD when exposure to sunlight is not feasible due to geographical location, season, or other factor. For patients who live in areas that receive frequent sunshine, an outside stroll for half an hour will likely achieve similar benefit to BLT.

The precise mechanism of action of BLT for bipolar depression has not yet been determined. It may be attributed to a phase-resetting effect via melanopsin and the suprachiasmatic nucleus (Box^18-24).

Continue to: BLT for BD...

Several studies and case reports have evaluated the use of BLT for bipolar depression. The number of participants in these studies is small, and there is no uniformity of methodology or patient selection.

Dauphinais et al (2012)²⁵ randomly assigned 44 patients with bipolar depression to BLT or a high-density or low-density negative ion generator for 8 weeks. They reported no difference in outcome between the various groups (50% vs 55.6%, remission and response rate). Only one patient in each group showed a switch to hypomania.

Carmadese et al (2015)²⁶ reported an open-label study of adjunctive BLT in 31 difficult-to-treat patients with depression (16 unipolar and 15 bipolar). Significant improvement was noted within 3 weeks and was sustained in 1 patient with bipolar depression 5 weeks after cessation of BLT.

Papatheodorou and Kutcher (1995)²⁷ treated 7 adolescents with bipolar depression with adjunctive BLT (10,000 lux twice per day). Three patients showed a marked response (>70% decrease from baseline Beck Depression Inventory and Symptom Check List scores). Two patients had a moderate response (40% to 47% decrease) and 2 patients obtained mild to no response. There were no reported adverse effects.

Benedetti et al (2014)²⁸ studied 141 patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Approximately one-quarter (23%) had a history of attempted suicide, and 83% had a history of drug resistance. The authors found a combination of total sleep deprivation, BLT, and lithium rapidly decreased suicidality and improved patients’ depressive symptoms.

Liebenluft et al (1995)²⁹ administered 13 trials of BLT to 9 patients with rapid-cycling BD during a 3-month period. Five patients received the treatment in the morning, 5 around midday, and 3 in the evening. Patients who received BLT at midday had the best outcome, while 3 of the 5 patients who received morning BLT developed unstable mood. The authors recommended titrating the duration of light exposure so that patients could skip a treatment if their mood was trending toward hypomania.

Sit et al (2007)³⁰ evaluated BLT in a case series of 9 women with bipolar I or II disorder in the depression phase. Patients were exposed to 50 lux of red light for 2 weeks, and then they received 7,000 lux BLT for 15, 30, and 45 minutes daily for 2 weeks (4 patients received morning light and 5 received midday light). Mood was assessed using the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale with Atypical Depression Supplement and the Mania Rating Scale. Of the 4 patients receiving morning BLT, one patient had a full response and the other 3 developed hypomania. Of the 5 patients who received midday BLT, 2 achieved full response, 2 showed early improvement but required a dose increase, and one remained depressed but had a full response when she was switched to morning BLT.

Tseng et al (2016)³¹ reported a meta-analysis of BLT for bipolar depression that included a total of 567 patients from 11 studies. They reported significant improvement with BLT alone or in combination with antidepressants or total sleep deprivation. They also reported significant improvement with BLT in 130 patients who were not receiving other treatments. There was no difference in the frequency of mood shifts between patients on BLT alone or in combination with other modalities. The authors reported no mood shift in any of the patients receiving concurrent mood stabilizers. They also reported no difference with the color of light, gender, or duration of illness.

Yorguner et al (2017)³² conducted a 2-week randomized, single-blind study of BLT as an add-on treatment for 32 patients with bipolar depression. Patients were randomly assigned to BLT or dim light, which they were administered each morning for 30 mins for 2 weeks. Sixteen patients who received BLT showed a significantly greater reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores (mean score of 24 at baseline down to 12) compared with 16 patients who received dim light (mean score of 24 at baseline down to 18). The authors also reported remission in 4 out of 4 patients who had seasonal depression, compared with 3 out of 12 who did not have seasonal depression (the other 9 showed response but not remission).

Zhou et al (2018)³³ conducted a multi-center, randomized, single-blind clinical trial of 63 patients with bipolar depression. Thirty-three patients received morning BLT, and 30 received dim red light therapy (control group). The authors reported a significantly higher response rate in the BLT group (78%) compared with the control group (43%).

Sit et al (2018)³⁴ conducted a 6-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of BLT vs dim red light in patients with bipolar I or II depression. Twenty-three patients were administered 7,000 lux bright white light, and 23 patients received 50 lux dim red light, at midday 5 days a week. The light dose was increased by 15 minutes every week up to 60 minutes by Week 4, unless the patient achieved remission. Patients were maintained on their usual medications, which included mood stabilizers and/or antidepressants. At Week 6, the group randomized to BLT had a significantly higher remission rate (68%) compared with patients who received dim red light (22%). Improvement was noted by Week 4. Patients receiving BLT also had significantly fewer depressive symptoms, and no mood polarity switch was noted.

Light box selection criteria. When selecting a light box or related BLT treatment apparatus, the Center for Environmental Therapeutics recommends consideration of the following factors³⁵:

• clinical efficacy
• ocular and dermatologic safety
• visual comfort.

The intensity of the light hitting the cornea depends on the distance from the light. In our experience, when the patient is facing the box it should provide 10,000 lux when he or she is 1 foot away at approximately a 45° angle (1 lux = 1 lumen per square meter). The light box selected should emit full spectrum white light with UV filter. The newest filters use LED, which is less expensive and more durable. Typically, we’ve found that it is most convenient for patients to use the light box in the morning before 9 am, but around noon is preferred for patients with BD. If using a light box is not feasible, we suggest the use of dawn light by the bedside before waking in the morning. Again, it is preferable to get some sunshine outdoors while taking a walk as long as geographical location and weather conditions permit.

Selecting a dose. The dose received is determined by the intensity emitted from the light source, distance from the light box, and duration of exposure.³⁶ Begin with midday light therapy between 12 noon and 2 pm at a daily dose of 15 minutes, and increase by 15 minutes every 2 weeks until the patient has achieved a euthymic mood.³⁴ Patients need not stare directly into the light source as long as the light is able to meet the eye at an angle of 30° to 60°.³⁵ The upper limit of midday light is 45 to 60 minutes, beyond which patients are more likely to have difficulty with adherence. Because morning BLT also may be effective, consider a change to morning light at a starting dose of 15 minutes for patients who respond partially or minimally to 45 to 60 mins of midday light, then increase it every week by an additional 7 to 15 mins.³⁵ For patients who respond to BLT, it is reasonable to continue light therapy for 12 months after remission to prevent relapses, similar to the recommendations for antidepressant therapy.³⁴

Monitor for adverse effects. Generally, BLT is well tolerated.³⁷ Adverse effects are rare; the most common ones include headache, eyestrain, nausea, and agitation.³⁸ One study found no adverse ocular effects from light therapy after 5 years of treatment.³⁹ Adverse effects tend to remit spontaneously or after dose reduction.³⁵ Evening administration of BLT may increase the incidence of sleep disturbances.⁴⁰ Like other biologic treatments for bipolar depression, BLT can precipitate manic/hypomanic and mixed states in susceptible patients, although the light dose can be titrated against emergent symptoms of hypomania.⁴¹

Bottom Line

Evidence suggests that bright light therapy is an effective, well tolerated, and affordable adjunct treatment for bipolar depression. Exposure to 5,000 to 7,000 lux around noon for 15 to 60 minutes will enhance the remission rate.

Related Resource

Mostert M, Dubovsky S. When bipolar treatment fails: what’s your next step? Current Psychiatry. 2008;7(1):39-46.

Drug Brand Name
Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid

BARCELONA – Young patients recently diagnosed with bipolar disorder are at double the 30-year risk of cardiovascular disease, compared with the general population, and their unaffected first-degree relatives are nearly as high risk, Klara Coello, MD, reported at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

The clinical implication of this finding is that unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with bipolar disorder – an affective disorder typically diagnosed at age 15-24 – should be targeted for intensified primary cardiovascular prevention, with a focus on smoking and dyslipidemia, both of which were more prevalent in these patients and their unaffected relatives than in the general population in her study, noted Dr. Coello, a doctoral candidate with the Copenhagen Affective Disorders Research Center at the University of Copenhagen.

She and her coinvestigators presented a cross-sectional study in which they calculated the 30-year Framingham Risk Scores for 221 patients recently diagnosed bipolar disorder – 95% of whom had been diagnosed within the past 2 years – along with 50 unaffected first-degree relatives and 119 age- and sex-matched controls. The investigators used the Framingham Risk Score because the widely used American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Estimator applies only to individuals aged 40 and up.

The key findings: The 30-year risk of cardiovascular disease for patients with bipolar was 98.5% greater than that of controls, and the calculated risk of the unaffected first-degree relatives was increased by 85.4%, compared with that of controls.

The Framingham Risk Score is determined on the basis of old-school cardiovascular risk factors, including age, gender, lipids, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking. The differences between the three study groups in terms of smoking prevalence accounted for most of the difference in projected 30-year cardiovascular risk: 45% of the bipolar patients were smokers, as were 20% of their first-degree relatives and 13% of controls.

The Danish finding of increased cardiovascular risk in young adults with bipolar disorder recapitulates an American Heart Association Scientific Statement, which was published in Circulation (2015 Sep 8;132[10]:965-86). The statement was intended to alert clinicians that these affective disorders constitute “moderate-risk” conditions for arterial dysfunction prior to age 30 and for premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). The statement declared that this risk is likely mediated not only by the classic cardiovascular risk factors but also by disease-related inflammation, oxidative stress, sleep disruption, and the adverse metabolic effects of many psychotropic medications.

“The magnitude of increased risk for CVD in adulthood is substantial,” according to the AHA expert panel’s scientific statement.

Dr. Coello’s study only took into account levels of the traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Where the study broke new ground that hadn’t been explored in the AHA scientific statement, however, was in identifying unaffected first-degree relatives as an additional at-risk group.

She reported having no financial conflicts regarding her study, which constitutes her PhD thesis.
 

[email protected]

BARCELONA – Young patients recently diagnosed with bipolar disorder are at double the 30-year risk of cardiovascular disease, compared with the general population, and their unaffected first-degree relatives are nearly as high risk, Klara Coello, MD, reported at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

The clinical implication of this finding is that unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with bipolar disorder – an affective disorder typically diagnosed at age 15-24 – should be targeted for intensified primary cardiovascular prevention, with a focus on smoking and dyslipidemia, both of which were more prevalent in these patients and their unaffected relatives than in the general population in her study, noted Dr. Coello, a doctoral candidate with the Copenhagen Affective Disorders Research Center at the University of Copenhagen.

She and her coinvestigators presented a cross-sectional study in which they calculated the 30-year Framingham Risk Scores for 221 patients recently diagnosed bipolar disorder – 95% of whom had been diagnosed within the past 2 years – along with 50 unaffected first-degree relatives and 119 age- and sex-matched controls. The investigators used the Framingham Risk Score because the widely used American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Estimator applies only to individuals aged 40 and up.

The key findings: The 30-year risk of cardiovascular disease for patients with bipolar was 98.5% greater than that of controls, and the calculated risk of the unaffected first-degree relatives was increased by 85.4%, compared with that of controls.

The Framingham Risk Score is determined on the basis of old-school cardiovascular risk factors, including age, gender, lipids, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking. The differences between the three study groups in terms of smoking prevalence accounted for most of the difference in projected 30-year cardiovascular risk: 45% of the bipolar patients were smokers, as were 20% of their first-degree relatives and 13% of controls.

The Danish finding of increased cardiovascular risk in young adults with bipolar disorder recapitulates an American Heart Association Scientific Statement, which was published in Circulation (2015 Sep 8;132[10]:965-86). The statement was intended to alert clinicians that these affective disorders constitute “moderate-risk” conditions for arterial dysfunction prior to age 30 and for premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). The statement declared that this risk is likely mediated not only by the classic cardiovascular risk factors but also by disease-related inflammation, oxidative stress, sleep disruption, and the adverse metabolic effects of many psychotropic medications.

“The magnitude of increased risk for CVD in adulthood is substantial,” according to the AHA expert panel’s scientific statement.

Dr. Coello’s study only took into account levels of the traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Where the study broke new ground that hadn’t been explored in the AHA scientific statement, however, was in identifying unaffected first-degree relatives as an additional at-risk group.

She reported having no financial conflicts regarding her study, which constitutes her PhD thesis.
 

[email protected]

BARCELONA – Young patients recently diagnosed with bipolar disorder are at double the 30-year risk of cardiovascular disease, compared with the general population, and their unaffected first-degree relatives are nearly as high risk, Klara Coello, MD, reported at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

The clinical implication of this finding is that unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with bipolar disorder – an affective disorder typically diagnosed at age 15-24 – should be targeted for intensified primary cardiovascular prevention, with a focus on smoking and dyslipidemia, both of which were more prevalent in these patients and their unaffected relatives than in the general population in her study, noted Dr. Coello, a doctoral candidate with the Copenhagen Affective Disorders Research Center at the University of Copenhagen.

She and her coinvestigators presented a cross-sectional study in which they calculated the 30-year Framingham Risk Scores for 221 patients recently diagnosed bipolar disorder – 95% of whom had been diagnosed within the past 2 years – along with 50 unaffected first-degree relatives and 119 age- and sex-matched controls. The investigators used the Framingham Risk Score because the widely used American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Estimator applies only to individuals aged 40 and up.

The key findings: The 30-year risk of cardiovascular disease for patients with bipolar was 98.5% greater than that of controls, and the calculated risk of the unaffected first-degree relatives was increased by 85.4%, compared with that of controls.

The Framingham Risk Score is determined on the basis of old-school cardiovascular risk factors, including age, gender, lipids, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking. The differences between the three study groups in terms of smoking prevalence accounted for most of the difference in projected 30-year cardiovascular risk: 45% of the bipolar patients were smokers, as were 20% of their first-degree relatives and 13% of controls.

The Danish finding of increased cardiovascular risk in young adults with bipolar disorder recapitulates an American Heart Association Scientific Statement, which was published in Circulation (2015 Sep 8;132[10]:965-86). The statement was intended to alert clinicians that these affective disorders constitute “moderate-risk” conditions for arterial dysfunction prior to age 30 and for premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). The statement declared that this risk is likely mediated not only by the classic cardiovascular risk factors but also by disease-related inflammation, oxidative stress, sleep disruption, and the adverse metabolic effects of many psychotropic medications.

“The magnitude of increased risk for CVD in adulthood is substantial,” according to the AHA expert panel’s scientific statement.

Dr. Coello’s study only took into account levels of the traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Where the study broke new ground that hadn’t been explored in the AHA scientific statement, however, was in identifying unaffected first-degree relatives as an additional at-risk group.

She reported having no financial conflicts regarding her study, which constitutes her PhD thesis.
 

[email protected]

BARCELONA – Among the handful of top publications on mood disorders during the first three-quarters of 2018 was a landmark comparison of the efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressants for acute treatment of major depressive disorder, Íria Grande, MD, PhD, said at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Dr. Grande, a psychiatrist at the bipolar disorders clinic of the University of Barcelona, shared her personal top picks.
 

‘Antidepressants work’

This epic systematic review and network meta-analysis (Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391[10128]:1357-66) encompassed 522 randomized double-blind trials with 116,477 participants with major depressive disorder assigned to 21 antidepressants or placebo, in some instances with an additional active comparator antidepressant arm. The report is a major extension of previous work by the same multinational group of investigators (Lancet. 2009 Feb 28;373[9665]:746-58), who initially scrutinized 12 older antidepressants in a total population only one-quarter the size of the updated analysis.

Based upon this vast randomized trial evidence, some of which came from unpublished studies tracked down by the investigators, the 21 antidepressants were rank-ordered in terms of effectiveness and acceptability. But in Dr. Grande’s view, the most important study finding wasn’t which antidepressant donned the crown of most effective or patient acceptable, it was the fact that all 21 drugs proved significantly more effective than placebo, with odds ratios ranging from 2.13 at the top end to 1.37 for reboxetine.

“The results showed antidepressants work. All of the antipsychiatry system is trying to show us that antidepressants do not work in major depression. Well, in this study, it has been proven that all antidepressants are more effective than placebo in major depressive disorder. I think social media should be made aware of that. (Lead investigator) Dr. Andrea Cipriani talked on the BBC about this article, and it had a high impact,” according to Dr. Grande.

All but three of the 21 antidepressants were deemed to be as acceptable as placebo, based upon study dropout rates. The exceptions were agomelatine and fluoxetine, which were 12%-14% more acceptable than placebo. “That’s strange, I think, but that’s what the clinical trial results showed,” she noted. The findings on clomipramine, which was 30% less acceptable than placebo, make sense, Dr. Grande said, “due to its muscarinic effects.”

She took issue with some of the specific study findings. For example, the two top-rated antidepressants in terms of efficacy were amitriptyline and mirtazapine, with odds ratios of 2.13 and 1.89, respectively.

“As a clinician, I don’t consider mirtazapine to be one of the best antidepressants, especially in major depression,” she said. “But these are the results, and as always, we have to adapt the evidence-based medicine and consider it from our clinical point of view.”

The investigators conducted a subanalysis restricted to placebo-controlled head-to-head studies with a comparator antidepressant which Dr. Grande found more interesting and informative than the overall analysis. In the head-to-head analysis, vortioxetine emerged as the top-rated antidepressant, both in efficacy, with an odds ratio of 2.0, as well as in acceptability.
 

Lithium vs. quetiapine

Finnish investigators used prospective national databases to examine the rates of psychiatric and all-cause hospitalization during a mean 7.2 years of follow-up in all 18,018 Finns hospitalized for bipolar disorder. The purpose was to assess the impact of various mood stabilizers on overall health outcomes in a real-world setting.

The big winner was lithium. In an analysis adjusted for concomitant psychotropic medications, duration of bipolar illness, and intervals of drug exposure and nonexposure, lithium was associated with the lowest risks of psychiatric rehospitalization and all-cause hospitalization, with relative risk reductions of 33% and 29%, respectively. In contrast, quetiapine, the most widely used antipsychotic agent, paled by comparison, achieving only an 8% reduction in the risk of psychiatric rehospitalization and a 7% decrease in all-cause hospitalization (JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 1;75[4]:347-55).

In addition, long-acting injectable antipsychotics were significantly more effective for prevention of hospitalization than oral antipsychotics.

“That is kind of shocking, because in some countries, long-acting injectables are not authorized and cannot be used. But I think after this article some regulatory changes are going to take place as a result,” Dr. Grande predicted.

“Another issue I thought was interesting, although it was not the main aim of the study, involved benzodiazepines. They increased the risk of hospitalizations, both for psychiatric illness and all other causes. So apart from giving lithium and long-acting injectable antipsychotics to our bipolar patients, we should also be really careful about the use of benzodiazepines,” she commented.
 

Intranasal esketamine for suicidality?

Esketamine nasal spray, a fast-acting N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist whose application for marketing approval in combination with a standard oral antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression is now under Food and Drug Administration review, also is being developed for another indication: reduction of suicidality in patients at imminent suicide risk. In a proof-of-concept study, intranasal esketamine resulted in a significant reduction in suicidal thoughts 4 hours after administration, compared with usual care – but not at 24 hours (Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;175[7]:620-30).

Phase 3 trials of intranasal esketamine for reduction of suicidality are ongoing. New and effective medications for this indication are sorely needed. The only drug approved for the indication of suicide prevention is clozapine.
 

‘Latest thinking’ on bipolar disorders

Dr. Grande coauthored a comprehensive review article on bipolar disorders that she recommended as worthwhile reading (Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Mar 8;4:18008. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.8).

“It covers all the latest thinking. It focuses on the early stages of the disorder, how epigenetic factors are essential, and many other topics, including the bipolarity index being developed at the University of Barcelona to classify drugs in terms of their capacity to prevent episodes of mania or depression in terms of number needed to treat and number needed to harm. It emphasizes the importance of intervening early and focusing on cognitive dysfunction,” Dr Grande said.
 

Psychedelics making a comeback

German and Swiss investigators used a facial expression discrimination task to demonstrate that psilocybin, a 5-hydroxytryptamine_2A–receptor agonist, decreases connectivity between the amygdala and regions of the brain important in emotion processing, including the striatum and frontal pole. The investigators theorized that this might be the mechanism for the psychedelic’s apparent antidepressant effects (Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Jun;28[6]:691-700).

Dr. Grande included this study in her top publications list because it reflects the rapidly growing rebirth of interest in psychedelics research among European psychiatrists.

Indeed, elsewhere at the ECNP congress David J. Nutt, DM, declared, “We now have the beginnings of some swinging of the pendulum back in a modern direction. Over the last 10 years there have been a small number of open studies, all done with psilocybin, which is somewhat easier to use than LSD. There are studies in OCD [obsessive-compulsive disorder], tobacco dependence, alcoholism, resistant depression, end-of-life mood changes with cancer and other terminal diseases, and at least two ongoing randomized trials in resistant depression.”

Dr. Nutt, professor of neuropsychopharmacology at Imperial College London, was senior author of the first proof-of-concept study of psilocybin accompanied by psychologic support as a novel therapy for moderate to severe treatment-resistant major depression (Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;3[7]:619-27).
 

Methylphenidate ineffective for treatment of acute mania

The MEMAP study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial testing what has been called the vigilance regulation model of mania. This model hypothesized that unstable regulation of wakefulness figures prominently in the pathogenesis of both mania and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. If true, investigators reasoned, then 2.5 days of methylphenidate at 20-40 mg/day should have a rapid antimanic effect similar to the drug’s benefits in ADHD. Dr. Grande had been a skeptic, and indeed, the trial was halted early for futility (Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Jan;28[1]:185-94).

She reported serving as a paid speaker for Lunbeck, Ferrer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Janssen. Her own research is funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

[email protected]

BARCELONA – Among the handful of top publications on mood disorders during the first three-quarters of 2018 was a landmark comparison of the efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressants for acute treatment of major depressive disorder, Íria Grande, MD, PhD, said at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Dr. Grande, a psychiatrist at the bipolar disorders clinic of the University of Barcelona, shared her personal top picks.
 

‘Antidepressants work’

This epic systematic review and network meta-analysis (Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391[10128]:1357-66) encompassed 522 randomized double-blind trials with 116,477 participants with major depressive disorder assigned to 21 antidepressants or placebo, in some instances with an additional active comparator antidepressant arm. The report is a major extension of previous work by the same multinational group of investigators (Lancet. 2009 Feb 28;373[9665]:746-58), who initially scrutinized 12 older antidepressants in a total population only one-quarter the size of the updated analysis.

Based upon this vast randomized trial evidence, some of which came from unpublished studies tracked down by the investigators, the 21 antidepressants were rank-ordered in terms of effectiveness and acceptability. But in Dr. Grande’s view, the most important study finding wasn’t which antidepressant donned the crown of most effective or patient acceptable, it was the fact that all 21 drugs proved significantly more effective than placebo, with odds ratios ranging from 2.13 at the top end to 1.37 for reboxetine.

“The results showed antidepressants work. All of the antipsychiatry system is trying to show us that antidepressants do not work in major depression. Well, in this study, it has been proven that all antidepressants are more effective than placebo in major depressive disorder. I think social media should be made aware of that. (Lead investigator) Dr. Andrea Cipriani talked on the BBC about this article, and it had a high impact,” according to Dr. Grande.

All but three of the 21 antidepressants were deemed to be as acceptable as placebo, based upon study dropout rates. The exceptions were agomelatine and fluoxetine, which were 12%-14% more acceptable than placebo. “That’s strange, I think, but that’s what the clinical trial results showed,” she noted. The findings on clomipramine, which was 30% less acceptable than placebo, make sense, Dr. Grande said, “due to its muscarinic effects.”

She took issue with some of the specific study findings. For example, the two top-rated antidepressants in terms of efficacy were amitriptyline and mirtazapine, with odds ratios of 2.13 and 1.89, respectively.

“As a clinician, I don’t consider mirtazapine to be one of the best antidepressants, especially in major depression,” she said. “But these are the results, and as always, we have to adapt the evidence-based medicine and consider it from our clinical point of view.”

The investigators conducted a subanalysis restricted to placebo-controlled head-to-head studies with a comparator antidepressant which Dr. Grande found more interesting and informative than the overall analysis. In the head-to-head analysis, vortioxetine emerged as the top-rated antidepressant, both in efficacy, with an odds ratio of 2.0, as well as in acceptability.
 

Lithium vs. quetiapine

Finnish investigators used prospective national databases to examine the rates of psychiatric and all-cause hospitalization during a mean 7.2 years of follow-up in all 18,018 Finns hospitalized for bipolar disorder. The purpose was to assess the impact of various mood stabilizers on overall health outcomes in a real-world setting.

The big winner was lithium. In an analysis adjusted for concomitant psychotropic medications, duration of bipolar illness, and intervals of drug exposure and nonexposure, lithium was associated with the lowest risks of psychiatric rehospitalization and all-cause hospitalization, with relative risk reductions of 33% and 29%, respectively. In contrast, quetiapine, the most widely used antipsychotic agent, paled by comparison, achieving only an 8% reduction in the risk of psychiatric rehospitalization and a 7% decrease in all-cause hospitalization (JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 1;75[4]:347-55).

In addition, long-acting injectable antipsychotics were significantly more effective for prevention of hospitalization than oral antipsychotics.

“That is kind of shocking, because in some countries, long-acting injectables are not authorized and cannot be used. But I think after this article some regulatory changes are going to take place as a result,” Dr. Grande predicted.

“Another issue I thought was interesting, although it was not the main aim of the study, involved benzodiazepines. They increased the risk of hospitalizations, both for psychiatric illness and all other causes. So apart from giving lithium and long-acting injectable antipsychotics to our bipolar patients, we should also be really careful about the use of benzodiazepines,” she commented.
 

Intranasal esketamine for suicidality?

Esketamine nasal spray, a fast-acting N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist whose application for marketing approval in combination with a standard oral antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression is now under Food and Drug Administration review, also is being developed for another indication: reduction of suicidality in patients at imminent suicide risk. In a proof-of-concept study, intranasal esketamine resulted in a significant reduction in suicidal thoughts 4 hours after administration, compared with usual care – but not at 24 hours (Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;175[7]:620-30).

Phase 3 trials of intranasal esketamine for reduction of suicidality are ongoing. New and effective medications for this indication are sorely needed. The only drug approved for the indication of suicide prevention is clozapine.
 

‘Latest thinking’ on bipolar disorders

Dr. Grande coauthored a comprehensive review article on bipolar disorders that she recommended as worthwhile reading (Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Mar 8;4:18008. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.8).

“It covers all the latest thinking. It focuses on the early stages of the disorder, how epigenetic factors are essential, and many other topics, including the bipolarity index being developed at the University of Barcelona to classify drugs in terms of their capacity to prevent episodes of mania or depression in terms of number needed to treat and number needed to harm. It emphasizes the importance of intervening early and focusing on cognitive dysfunction,” Dr Grande said.
 

Psychedelics making a comeback

German and Swiss investigators used a facial expression discrimination task to demonstrate that psilocybin, a 5-hydroxytryptamine_2A–receptor agonist, decreases connectivity between the amygdala and regions of the brain important in emotion processing, including the striatum and frontal pole. The investigators theorized that this might be the mechanism for the psychedelic’s apparent antidepressant effects (Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Jun;28[6]:691-700).

Dr. Grande included this study in her top publications list because it reflects the rapidly growing rebirth of interest in psychedelics research among European psychiatrists.

Indeed, elsewhere at the ECNP congress David J. Nutt, DM, declared, “We now have the beginnings of some swinging of the pendulum back in a modern direction. Over the last 10 years there have been a small number of open studies, all done with psilocybin, which is somewhat easier to use than LSD. There are studies in OCD [obsessive-compulsive disorder], tobacco dependence, alcoholism, resistant depression, end-of-life mood changes with cancer and other terminal diseases, and at least two ongoing randomized trials in resistant depression.”

Dr. Nutt, professor of neuropsychopharmacology at Imperial College London, was senior author of the first proof-of-concept study of psilocybin accompanied by psychologic support as a novel therapy for moderate to severe treatment-resistant major depression (Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;3[7]:619-27).
 

Methylphenidate ineffective for treatment of acute mania

The MEMAP study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial testing what has been called the vigilance regulation model of mania. This model hypothesized that unstable regulation of wakefulness figures prominently in the pathogenesis of both mania and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. If true, investigators reasoned, then 2.5 days of methylphenidate at 20-40 mg/day should have a rapid antimanic effect similar to the drug’s benefits in ADHD. Dr. Grande had been a skeptic, and indeed, the trial was halted early for futility (Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Jan;28[1]:185-94).

She reported serving as a paid speaker for Lunbeck, Ferrer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Janssen. Her own research is funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

[email protected]

BARCELONA – Among the handful of top publications on mood disorders during the first three-quarters of 2018 was a landmark comparison of the efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressants for acute treatment of major depressive disorder, Íria Grande, MD, PhD, said at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Dr. Grande, a psychiatrist at the bipolar disorders clinic of the University of Barcelona, shared her personal top picks.
 

‘Antidepressants work’

This epic systematic review and network meta-analysis (Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391[10128]:1357-66) encompassed 522 randomized double-blind trials with 116,477 participants with major depressive disorder assigned to 21 antidepressants or placebo, in some instances with an additional active comparator antidepressant arm. The report is a major extension of previous work by the same multinational group of investigators (Lancet. 2009 Feb 28;373[9665]:746-58), who initially scrutinized 12 older antidepressants in a total population only one-quarter the size of the updated analysis.

Based upon this vast randomized trial evidence, some of which came from unpublished studies tracked down by the investigators, the 21 antidepressants were rank-ordered in terms of effectiveness and acceptability. But in Dr. Grande’s view, the most important study finding wasn’t which antidepressant donned the crown of most effective or patient acceptable, it was the fact that all 21 drugs proved significantly more effective than placebo, with odds ratios ranging from 2.13 at the top end to 1.37 for reboxetine.

“The results showed antidepressants work. All of the antipsychiatry system is trying to show us that antidepressants do not work in major depression. Well, in this study, it has been proven that all antidepressants are more effective than placebo in major depressive disorder. I think social media should be made aware of that. (Lead investigator) Dr. Andrea Cipriani talked on the BBC about this article, and it had a high impact,” according to Dr. Grande.

All but three of the 21 antidepressants were deemed to be as acceptable as placebo, based upon study dropout rates. The exceptions were agomelatine and fluoxetine, which were 12%-14% more acceptable than placebo. “That’s strange, I think, but that’s what the clinical trial results showed,” she noted. The findings on clomipramine, which was 30% less acceptable than placebo, make sense, Dr. Grande said, “due to its muscarinic effects.”

She took issue with some of the specific study findings. For example, the two top-rated antidepressants in terms of efficacy were amitriptyline and mirtazapine, with odds ratios of 2.13 and 1.89, respectively.

“As a clinician, I don’t consider mirtazapine to be one of the best antidepressants, especially in major depression,” she said. “But these are the results, and as always, we have to adapt the evidence-based medicine and consider it from our clinical point of view.”

The investigators conducted a subanalysis restricted to placebo-controlled head-to-head studies with a comparator antidepressant which Dr. Grande found more interesting and informative than the overall analysis. In the head-to-head analysis, vortioxetine emerged as the top-rated antidepressant, both in efficacy, with an odds ratio of 2.0, as well as in acceptability.
 

Lithium vs. quetiapine

Finnish investigators used prospective national databases to examine the rates of psychiatric and all-cause hospitalization during a mean 7.2 years of follow-up in all 18,018 Finns hospitalized for bipolar disorder. The purpose was to assess the impact of various mood stabilizers on overall health outcomes in a real-world setting.

The big winner was lithium. In an analysis adjusted for concomitant psychotropic medications, duration of bipolar illness, and intervals of drug exposure and nonexposure, lithium was associated with the lowest risks of psychiatric rehospitalization and all-cause hospitalization, with relative risk reductions of 33% and 29%, respectively. In contrast, quetiapine, the most widely used antipsychotic agent, paled by comparison, achieving only an 8% reduction in the risk of psychiatric rehospitalization and a 7% decrease in all-cause hospitalization (JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 1;75[4]:347-55).

In addition, long-acting injectable antipsychotics were significantly more effective for prevention of hospitalization than oral antipsychotics.

“That is kind of shocking, because in some countries, long-acting injectables are not authorized and cannot be used. But I think after this article some regulatory changes are going to take place as a result,” Dr. Grande predicted.

“Another issue I thought was interesting, although it was not the main aim of the study, involved benzodiazepines. They increased the risk of hospitalizations, both for psychiatric illness and all other causes. So apart from giving lithium and long-acting injectable antipsychotics to our bipolar patients, we should also be really careful about the use of benzodiazepines,” she commented.
 

Intranasal esketamine for suicidality?

Esketamine nasal spray, a fast-acting N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist whose application for marketing approval in combination with a standard oral antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression is now under Food and Drug Administration review, also is being developed for another indication: reduction of suicidality in patients at imminent suicide risk. In a proof-of-concept study, intranasal esketamine resulted in a significant reduction in suicidal thoughts 4 hours after administration, compared with usual care – but not at 24 hours (Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;175[7]:620-30).

Phase 3 trials of intranasal esketamine for reduction of suicidality are ongoing. New and effective medications for this indication are sorely needed. The only drug approved for the indication of suicide prevention is clozapine.
 

‘Latest thinking’ on bipolar disorders

Dr. Grande coauthored a comprehensive review article on bipolar disorders that she recommended as worthwhile reading (Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Mar 8;4:18008. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.8).

“It covers all the latest thinking. It focuses on the early stages of the disorder, how epigenetic factors are essential, and many other topics, including the bipolarity index being developed at the University of Barcelona to classify drugs in terms of their capacity to prevent episodes of mania or depression in terms of number needed to treat and number needed to harm. It emphasizes the importance of intervening early and focusing on cognitive dysfunction,” Dr Grande said.
 

Psychedelics making a comeback

German and Swiss investigators used a facial expression discrimination task to demonstrate that psilocybin, a 5-hydroxytryptamine_2A–receptor agonist, decreases connectivity between the amygdala and regions of the brain important in emotion processing, including the striatum and frontal pole. The investigators theorized that this might be the mechanism for the psychedelic’s apparent antidepressant effects (Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Jun;28[6]:691-700).

Dr. Grande included this study in her top publications list because it reflects the rapidly growing rebirth of interest in psychedelics research among European psychiatrists.

Indeed, elsewhere at the ECNP congress David J. Nutt, DM, declared, “We now have the beginnings of some swinging of the pendulum back in a modern direction. Over the last 10 years there have been a small number of open studies, all done with psilocybin, which is somewhat easier to use than LSD. There are studies in OCD [obsessive-compulsive disorder], tobacco dependence, alcoholism, resistant depression, end-of-life mood changes with cancer and other terminal diseases, and at least two ongoing randomized trials in resistant depression.”

Dr. Nutt, professor of neuropsychopharmacology at Imperial College London, was senior author of the first proof-of-concept study of psilocybin accompanied by psychologic support as a novel therapy for moderate to severe treatment-resistant major depression (Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;3[7]:619-27).
 

Methylphenidate ineffective for treatment of acute mania

The MEMAP study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial testing what has been called the vigilance regulation model of mania. This model hypothesized that unstable regulation of wakefulness figures prominently in the pathogenesis of both mania and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. If true, investigators reasoned, then 2.5 days of methylphenidate at 20-40 mg/day should have a rapid antimanic effect similar to the drug’s benefits in ADHD. Dr. Grande had been a skeptic, and indeed, the trial was halted early for futility (Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Jan;28[1]:185-94).

She reported serving as a paid speaker for Lunbeck, Ferrer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Janssen. Her own research is funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

[email protected]

BARCELONA – A large Swedish national registry study has found no hint of increased cancer risk in bipolar patients on long-term lithium therapy.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“This is a very important null result. There is no increased risk for cancer for bipolar patients on lithium. It’s a bad rumor. It’s important to tell patients we’re very confident this is true. We studied every single type of cancer. We would have seen something here if there was something to see,” Lina Martinsson, MD, PhD, said at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Using comprehensive registry data on nearly 2.6 million Swedes aged 50-84 years with 4 years of follow-up, including 2,393 patients with bipolar disorder on long-term lithium and 3,049 patients not on lithium, the overall cancer incidence rate was 5.9% in the group on lithium and 6.0% in those not taking the drug. Those rates were not different from the general Swedish population, reported Dr. Martinsson, a senior psychiatrist at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm.

There was, however, a statistically significant increase in three types of cancer in bipolar patients not on lithium: Such patients had a 72% greater risk of lung cancer and other cancers of the respiratory system than the general population, a 47% increased risk of GI cancers, and a 150% greater risk of endocrine organ cancers.

“The increase in respiratory and digestive organ cancers might depend upon bipolar patients’ tendency for smoking and other types of hard living. We can’t explain the increase in endocrine cancers,” she said.

In contrast, the rates of these types of cancer were no different from the general population in bipolar patients taking lithium, hinting at a possible protective effect of the drug, although this remains speculative, the psychiatrist added.

The question of whether lithium is associated with increased cancer risk has been controversial. In particular, several groups have reported a possible increased risk of renal cancer on the basis of what Dr. Martinsson considers weak evidence. She felt a responsibility to undertake this definitive Swedish national study examining the issue because the cancer speculation arose following her earlier study demonstrating that bipolar patients on lithium had much longer telomeres than those not on the drug, and that the ones who responded well to lithium had longer telomeres than those who did not (Transl Psychiatry. 2013 May 21. doi: 10.1038/tp.2013.37).

“If longer telomere length gives longer life to the wrong cells, it might enhance the risk of cancer,” she noted.

But this theoretical concern did not hold up under close Swedish scrutiny. “Warnings for cancer in patients with long-term lithium treatment are unnecessary and ought to be omitted from the current policies,” Dr. Martinsson said.

She reported no financial conflicts regarding her study, which was funded by the Swedish Research Council.

[email protected]

BARCELONA – A large Swedish national registry study has found no hint of increased cancer risk in bipolar patients on long-term lithium therapy.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“This is a very important null result. There is no increased risk for cancer for bipolar patients on lithium. It’s a bad rumor. It’s important to tell patients we’re very confident this is true. We studied every single type of cancer. We would have seen something here if there was something to see,” Lina Martinsson, MD, PhD, said at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Using comprehensive registry data on nearly 2.6 million Swedes aged 50-84 years with 4 years of follow-up, including 2,393 patients with bipolar disorder on long-term lithium and 3,049 patients not on lithium, the overall cancer incidence rate was 5.9% in the group on lithium and 6.0% in those not taking the drug. Those rates were not different from the general Swedish population, reported Dr. Martinsson, a senior psychiatrist at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm.

There was, however, a statistically significant increase in three types of cancer in bipolar patients not on lithium: Such patients had a 72% greater risk of lung cancer and other cancers of the respiratory system than the general population, a 47% increased risk of GI cancers, and a 150% greater risk of endocrine organ cancers.

“The increase in respiratory and digestive organ cancers might depend upon bipolar patients’ tendency for smoking and other types of hard living. We can’t explain the increase in endocrine cancers,” she said.

In contrast, the rates of these types of cancer were no different from the general population in bipolar patients taking lithium, hinting at a possible protective effect of the drug, although this remains speculative, the psychiatrist added.

The question of whether lithium is associated with increased cancer risk has been controversial. In particular, several groups have reported a possible increased risk of renal cancer on the basis of what Dr. Martinsson considers weak evidence. She felt a responsibility to undertake this definitive Swedish national study examining the issue because the cancer speculation arose following her earlier study demonstrating that bipolar patients on lithium had much longer telomeres than those not on the drug, and that the ones who responded well to lithium had longer telomeres than those who did not (Transl Psychiatry. 2013 May 21. doi: 10.1038/tp.2013.37).

“If longer telomere length gives longer life to the wrong cells, it might enhance the risk of cancer,” she noted.

But this theoretical concern did not hold up under close Swedish scrutiny. “Warnings for cancer in patients with long-term lithium treatment are unnecessary and ought to be omitted from the current policies,” Dr. Martinsson said.

She reported no financial conflicts regarding her study, which was funded by the Swedish Research Council.

[email protected]

BARCELONA – A large Swedish national registry study has found no hint of increased cancer risk in bipolar patients on long-term lithium therapy.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“This is a very important null result. There is no increased risk for cancer for bipolar patients on lithium. It’s a bad rumor. It’s important to tell patients we’re very confident this is true. We studied every single type of cancer. We would have seen something here if there was something to see,” Lina Martinsson, MD, PhD, said at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Using comprehensive registry data on nearly 2.6 million Swedes aged 50-84 years with 4 years of follow-up, including 2,393 patients with bipolar disorder on long-term lithium and 3,049 patients not on lithium, the overall cancer incidence rate was 5.9% in the group on lithium and 6.0% in those not taking the drug. Those rates were not different from the general Swedish population, reported Dr. Martinsson, a senior psychiatrist at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm.

There was, however, a statistically significant increase in three types of cancer in bipolar patients not on lithium: Such patients had a 72% greater risk of lung cancer and other cancers of the respiratory system than the general population, a 47% increased risk of GI cancers, and a 150% greater risk of endocrine organ cancers.

“The increase in respiratory and digestive organ cancers might depend upon bipolar patients’ tendency for smoking and other types of hard living. We can’t explain the increase in endocrine cancers,” she said.

In contrast, the rates of these types of cancer were no different from the general population in bipolar patients taking lithium, hinting at a possible protective effect of the drug, although this remains speculative, the psychiatrist added.

The question of whether lithium is associated with increased cancer risk has been controversial. In particular, several groups have reported a possible increased risk of renal cancer on the basis of what Dr. Martinsson considers weak evidence. She felt a responsibility to undertake this definitive Swedish national study examining the issue because the cancer speculation arose following her earlier study demonstrating that bipolar patients on lithium had much longer telomeres than those not on the drug, and that the ones who responded well to lithium had longer telomeres than those who did not (Transl Psychiatry. 2013 May 21. doi: 10.1038/tp.2013.37).

“If longer telomere length gives longer life to the wrong cells, it might enhance the risk of cancer,” she noted.

But this theoretical concern did not hold up under close Swedish scrutiny. “Warnings for cancer in patients with long-term lithium treatment are unnecessary and ought to be omitted from the current policies,” Dr. Martinsson said.

She reported no financial conflicts regarding her study, which was funded by the Swedish Research Council.

[email protected]

BERLIN – Depression and bipolar disorder are major risk factors for worsening disability in people with multiple sclerosis, according to the results of a large Swedish registry-based study.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News

The presence of depression increased the risk of having a sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3.0 by 54% and 4.0 by 87%, and it doubled the risk of an EDSS of 6.0.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment also upped the risk of greater disability, with patients exposed to SSRIs having a 40% increased risk of a sustained EDSS of 3.0, a 97% chance of having a sustained EDSS of 4.0, and 2.2-fold increased risk of a sustained EDSS of 6.0.

“We know that mood disorders are highly prevalent in people with multiple sclerosis,” Stefanie Binzer, MD, said at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis. She gave her presentation at the meeting on Oct. 10, which was World Mental Health Day.

The presence of mood disorders is associated with reduced quality of life, said Dr. Binzer of the department of clinical neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. Furthermore, depression is the major risk factor for suicidality in patients with MS. However, before this study the effect of having a comorbid mood disorder on MS patients’ disability levels had not been established.

The investigators analyzed data from 5,875 patients in the Swedish MS registry between 2001 and 2014. By matching these patients to records in the Swedish National Patient Registry and the Swedish National Prescribed Drug Registry, they found that 8.5% (n = 502) had an International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), code for depression. Of these, 261 had received a diagnosis of depression before their diagnosis of MS.

Of 3,817 patients with MS onset between 2005 and 2014, 27.4% (n = 1,048) had collected at least one prescription for an SSRI.

“What we found was that MS patients with either an ICD code for depression or having been exposed to SSRIs had a significantly increased risk of reaching EDSS 3.0,” Dr. Binzer reported. The age at which patients reached these milestones were younger in both groups when compared with MS patients without depression, she observed.

“The difference between the groups [MS with and MS without depression] seemed to increased with EDSS,” Dr. Binzer said.

Although not statistically significant, there was a trend for patients with depression to be more likely to convert to secondary progressive MS, with a hazard ratio of 1.38 (95% confidence interval, 0.91-2.1).

“For a sensitivity analysis, we found that those who had depression prior to their first MS symptom, the median age when they reached EDSS 3.0 and 4.0 was reduced by 3 and 7 years, respectively,” Dr. Binzer said, adding that, unfortunately, there wasn’t enough power to look at the other endpoints.

In regard to bipolar disorder, 1.5% (n = 200) of 13,125 MS patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2014 were identified with this mood disorder. Its presence significantly increased the risk of MS patients reaching an EDSS score of 4.0 by 58% (95% CI, 1.1-2.28), but not EDSS 3.0 (HR = 1.34; 95% CI, 0.94-1.92) or 6.0 (HR = 1.16; 95% CI, 0.79-1.69). The latter could be due to smaller sample size, Dr. Binzer suggested.

The investigators’ analysis of the results stratified by sex, conducted because men tend to fare worse than women with MS and progress faster, showed that for both depression and bipolar disorder, men were at significantly higher risk of reaching sustained disability milestones. Indeed, compared with women, men with depression had a 61% increased risk and those with bipolar disorder a 31% increased risk of reaching an EDSS score of 6.0. They also had 51% and 32% increased risks of conversion to secondary progressive MS.

“We don’t know the mechanisms that underlie these associations,” Dr. Binzer noted. “Irrespective of the underlying mechanisms, [the study] clearly shows that it’s imperative that we recognize, early, mood disorders in MS patients, and manage them effectively in order to provide better care and hopefully reduce MS disability worsening.”

The research was funded by the Swedish Research Council and the Swedish Brain Foundation. Dr. Binzer has received speaker fees and travel grants from Biogen.

SOURCE: Binzer S et al. Mult Scler. 2018;24(Suppl 2):41. Abstract 99.

BERLIN – Depression and bipolar disorder are major risk factors for worsening disability in people with multiple sclerosis, according to the results of a large Swedish registry-based study.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News

The presence of depression increased the risk of having a sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3.0 by 54% and 4.0 by 87%, and it doubled the risk of an EDSS of 6.0.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment also upped the risk of greater disability, with patients exposed to SSRIs having a 40% increased risk of a sustained EDSS of 3.0, a 97% chance of having a sustained EDSS of 4.0, and 2.2-fold increased risk of a sustained EDSS of 6.0.

“We know that mood disorders are highly prevalent in people with multiple sclerosis,” Stefanie Binzer, MD, said at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis. She gave her presentation at the meeting on Oct. 10, which was World Mental Health Day.

The presence of mood disorders is associated with reduced quality of life, said Dr. Binzer of the department of clinical neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. Furthermore, depression is the major risk factor for suicidality in patients with MS. However, before this study the effect of having a comorbid mood disorder on MS patients’ disability levels had not been established.

The investigators analyzed data from 5,875 patients in the Swedish MS registry between 2001 and 2014. By matching these patients to records in the Swedish National Patient Registry and the Swedish National Prescribed Drug Registry, they found that 8.5% (n = 502) had an International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), code for depression. Of these, 261 had received a diagnosis of depression before their diagnosis of MS.

Of 3,817 patients with MS onset between 2005 and 2014, 27.4% (n = 1,048) had collected at least one prescription for an SSRI.

“What we found was that MS patients with either an ICD code for depression or having been exposed to SSRIs had a significantly increased risk of reaching EDSS 3.0,” Dr. Binzer reported. The age at which patients reached these milestones were younger in both groups when compared with MS patients without depression, she observed.

“The difference between the groups [MS with and MS without depression] seemed to increased with EDSS,” Dr. Binzer said.

Although not statistically significant, there was a trend for patients with depression to be more likely to convert to secondary progressive MS, with a hazard ratio of 1.38 (95% confidence interval, 0.91-2.1).

“For a sensitivity analysis, we found that those who had depression prior to their first MS symptom, the median age when they reached EDSS 3.0 and 4.0 was reduced by 3 and 7 years, respectively,” Dr. Binzer said, adding that, unfortunately, there wasn’t enough power to look at the other endpoints.

In regard to bipolar disorder, 1.5% (n = 200) of 13,125 MS patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2014 were identified with this mood disorder. Its presence significantly increased the risk of MS patients reaching an EDSS score of 4.0 by 58% (95% CI, 1.1-2.28), but not EDSS 3.0 (HR = 1.34; 95% CI, 0.94-1.92) or 6.0 (HR = 1.16; 95% CI, 0.79-1.69). The latter could be due to smaller sample size, Dr. Binzer suggested.

The investigators’ analysis of the results stratified by sex, conducted because men tend to fare worse than women with MS and progress faster, showed that for both depression and bipolar disorder, men were at significantly higher risk of reaching sustained disability milestones. Indeed, compared with women, men with depression had a 61% increased risk and those with bipolar disorder a 31% increased risk of reaching an EDSS score of 6.0. They also had 51% and 32% increased risks of conversion to secondary progressive MS.

“We don’t know the mechanisms that underlie these associations,” Dr. Binzer noted. “Irrespective of the underlying mechanisms, [the study] clearly shows that it’s imperative that we recognize, early, mood disorders in MS patients, and manage them effectively in order to provide better care and hopefully reduce MS disability worsening.”

The research was funded by the Swedish Research Council and the Swedish Brain Foundation. Dr. Binzer has received speaker fees and travel grants from Biogen.

SOURCE: Binzer S et al. Mult Scler. 2018;24(Suppl 2):41. Abstract 99.

BERLIN – Depression and bipolar disorder are major risk factors for worsening disability in people with multiple sclerosis, according to the results of a large Swedish registry-based study.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News

The presence of depression increased the risk of having a sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3.0 by 54% and 4.0 by 87%, and it doubled the risk of an EDSS of 6.0.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment also upped the risk of greater disability, with patients exposed to SSRIs having a 40% increased risk of a sustained EDSS of 3.0, a 97% chance of having a sustained EDSS of 4.0, and 2.2-fold increased risk of a sustained EDSS of 6.0.

“We know that mood disorders are highly prevalent in people with multiple sclerosis,” Stefanie Binzer, MD, said at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis. She gave her presentation at the meeting on Oct. 10, which was World Mental Health Day.

The presence of mood disorders is associated with reduced quality of life, said Dr. Binzer of the department of clinical neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. Furthermore, depression is the major risk factor for suicidality in patients with MS. However, before this study the effect of having a comorbid mood disorder on MS patients’ disability levels had not been established.

The investigators analyzed data from 5,875 patients in the Swedish MS registry between 2001 and 2014. By matching these patients to records in the Swedish National Patient Registry and the Swedish National Prescribed Drug Registry, they found that 8.5% (n = 502) had an International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), code for depression. Of these, 261 had received a diagnosis of depression before their diagnosis of MS.

Of 3,817 patients with MS onset between 2005 and 2014, 27.4% (n = 1,048) had collected at least one prescription for an SSRI.

“What we found was that MS patients with either an ICD code for depression or having been exposed to SSRIs had a significantly increased risk of reaching EDSS 3.0,” Dr. Binzer reported. The age at which patients reached these milestones were younger in both groups when compared with MS patients without depression, she observed.

“The difference between the groups [MS with and MS without depression] seemed to increased with EDSS,” Dr. Binzer said.

Although not statistically significant, there was a trend for patients with depression to be more likely to convert to secondary progressive MS, with a hazard ratio of 1.38 (95% confidence interval, 0.91-2.1).

“For a sensitivity analysis, we found that those who had depression prior to their first MS symptom, the median age when they reached EDSS 3.0 and 4.0 was reduced by 3 and 7 years, respectively,” Dr. Binzer said, adding that, unfortunately, there wasn’t enough power to look at the other endpoints.

In regard to bipolar disorder, 1.5% (n = 200) of 13,125 MS patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2014 were identified with this mood disorder. Its presence significantly increased the risk of MS patients reaching an EDSS score of 4.0 by 58% (95% CI, 1.1-2.28), but not EDSS 3.0 (HR = 1.34; 95% CI, 0.94-1.92) or 6.0 (HR = 1.16; 95% CI, 0.79-1.69). The latter could be due to smaller sample size, Dr. Binzer suggested.

The investigators’ analysis of the results stratified by sex, conducted because men tend to fare worse than women with MS and progress faster, showed that for both depression and bipolar disorder, men were at significantly higher risk of reaching sustained disability milestones. Indeed, compared with women, men with depression had a 61% increased risk and those with bipolar disorder a 31% increased risk of reaching an EDSS score of 6.0. They also had 51% and 32% increased risks of conversion to secondary progressive MS.

“We don’t know the mechanisms that underlie these associations,” Dr. Binzer noted. “Irrespective of the underlying mechanisms, [the study] clearly shows that it’s imperative that we recognize, early, mood disorders in MS patients, and manage them effectively in order to provide better care and hopefully reduce MS disability worsening.”

The research was funded by the Swedish Research Council and the Swedish Brain Foundation. Dr. Binzer has received speaker fees and travel grants from Biogen.

SOURCE: Binzer S et al. Mult Scler. 2018;24(Suppl 2):41. Abstract 99.