User login
Study finds secukinumab effective for moderate to severe scalp psoriasis
Secukinumab is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with moderate to severe scalp psoriasis, according to Dr. Jerry Bagel of the Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey, and his associates.
After 12 weeks of treatment with 300 mg of secukinumab, administered subcutaneously, 52.9% of the 50 patients who received secukinumab achieved a 90% reduction in their Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index score, and 35.3% achieved complete clearance of scalp psoriasis. Only 2% of the 47 patients in the placebo group achieved PSSI 90, and no one achieved complete clearance, in the phase 3b study.
“These promising results demonstrate the possibility of establishing PSSI 90 as a new benchmark for scalp psoriasis treatment outcome,” the investigators noted. Secukinumab (Cosentyx) is approved for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, active psoriatic arthritis, and in adult patients who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy, and ankylosing spondylitis.
Find the study in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.05.033).
Secukinumab is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with moderate to severe scalp psoriasis, according to Dr. Jerry Bagel of the Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey, and his associates.
After 12 weeks of treatment with 300 mg of secukinumab, administered subcutaneously, 52.9% of the 50 patients who received secukinumab achieved a 90% reduction in their Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index score, and 35.3% achieved complete clearance of scalp psoriasis. Only 2% of the 47 patients in the placebo group achieved PSSI 90, and no one achieved complete clearance, in the phase 3b study.
“These promising results demonstrate the possibility of establishing PSSI 90 as a new benchmark for scalp psoriasis treatment outcome,” the investigators noted. Secukinumab (Cosentyx) is approved for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, active psoriatic arthritis, and in adult patients who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy, and ankylosing spondylitis.
Find the study in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.05.033).
Secukinumab is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with moderate to severe scalp psoriasis, according to Dr. Jerry Bagel of the Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey, and his associates.
After 12 weeks of treatment with 300 mg of secukinumab, administered subcutaneously, 52.9% of the 50 patients who received secukinumab achieved a 90% reduction in their Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index score, and 35.3% achieved complete clearance of scalp psoriasis. Only 2% of the 47 patients in the placebo group achieved PSSI 90, and no one achieved complete clearance, in the phase 3b study.
“These promising results demonstrate the possibility of establishing PSSI 90 as a new benchmark for scalp psoriasis treatment outcome,” the investigators noted. Secukinumab (Cosentyx) is approved for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, active psoriatic arthritis, and in adult patients who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy, and ankylosing spondylitis.
Find the study in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.05.033).
FROM THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Alopecia may be permanent in one in four pediatric HSCT patients
CHICAGO – Late dermatologic manifestations in children who have received hematopoietic stem cell transplants may be more common than previously thought, according to results of a new study.
Johanna Song, MD, and her collaborators reported that, in their prospective pediatric study, 25% of patients had permanent alopecia and 16% had psoriasis, noting that late nonmalignant skin effects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have been studied primarily retrospectively, and in adults. Vitiligo and nail changes were also seen.
In a poster presentation at the World Congress of Dermatology, Dr. Song and her colleagues noted that these figures are higher than the previously reported pediatric rates of 1.7% for vitiligo and 15.6% for permanent alopecia. “Early recognition of these late effects can facilitate prompt and appropriate treatment, if desired,” they said.
The single-center, cross-sectional cohort study tracked pediatric patients over an 18-month period and included patients who were at least 1 year post allogeneic HSCT and had not relapsed. Patients who were not English speaking were excluded.
The median age of the 85 patients enrolled in the study was 13.8 years, and participants were a median of 3.6 years post transplant at the time of enrollment. The study’s analysis attempted to determine which patient, transplant, and disease factors might be associated with the late nonmalignant skin changes, according to Dr. Song, a resident dermatologist at Harvard University, Boston, and her colleagues.
Most – 52– of the patients (61.2%) had hematologic malignancies; 12 patients (14.1%) received their transplant for bone marrow failure, and 11 patients (12.5%) had immunodeficiency. Three patients (3.5%) received HSCT for other malignancies, and seven (8.2%) for nonmalignant diseases.
Diffuse hair thinning was seen in 13 (62%) of the 21 patients who had alopecia, while 11 (52%) of the patients with alopecia had an androgenetic hair loss pattern. Chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD), skin chronic GVHD, a HSCT regimen that included busulfan conditioning, and a family history of early male-pattern alopecia were all significantly associated with post-HSCT permanent alopecia (P less than .05 for all).
The patients with androgenetic alopecia may be experiencing an accelerated time course of a condition to which they are already genetically disposed, noted Dr. Song and her colleagues.
Psoriasis was commonly seen on the scalp, affecting 11 of the 14 patients with psoriasis (79%), and involved the face in five of the patients (36%). Just one patient had psoriasis elsewhere on the body. There was a nonsignificant trend towards human leukocyte antigen mismatch among patients who had psoriasis. Although “psoriasis may be a marker of persistent immune dysregulation,” the investigators said, they did not identify any associated risk factors that would point toward this mechanism in their analysis.
Twelve patients (14%) had vitiligo, with halo nevi seen in four of these patients. Children who were younger than age 10 years and those who received their transplant for primary immunodeficiency were significantly more likely to have vitiligo (P less than .05 for both). Specific possible mechanisms triggering vitiligo could include thymic dysfunction resulting in loss of self-tolerance, and donor alloreactivity against the patient’s host antigens, according to the authors.
Nail changes such as pterygium and nail pitting, ridging, or thickening were seen in just five patients, all of whom had chronic GVHD of the skin. “Nail changes are likely a result of persistent inflammation and immune dysregulation from chronic GVHD,” said Dr. Song.
These late effects “can significantly impact patients’ quality of life,” according to the authors, who called for larger studies that follow pediatric HSCT patients longitudinally, beginning before the transplant – and for more investigation into the pathogenesis of specific late effects.
Dr. Song reported no relevant conflicts of interest.
[email protected]
On Twitter @karioakes
CHICAGO – Late dermatologic manifestations in children who have received hematopoietic stem cell transplants may be more common than previously thought, according to results of a new study.
Johanna Song, MD, and her collaborators reported that, in their prospective pediatric study, 25% of patients had permanent alopecia and 16% had psoriasis, noting that late nonmalignant skin effects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have been studied primarily retrospectively, and in adults. Vitiligo and nail changes were also seen.
In a poster presentation at the World Congress of Dermatology, Dr. Song and her colleagues noted that these figures are higher than the previously reported pediatric rates of 1.7% for vitiligo and 15.6% for permanent alopecia. “Early recognition of these late effects can facilitate prompt and appropriate treatment, if desired,” they said.
The single-center, cross-sectional cohort study tracked pediatric patients over an 18-month period and included patients who were at least 1 year post allogeneic HSCT and had not relapsed. Patients who were not English speaking were excluded.
The median age of the 85 patients enrolled in the study was 13.8 years, and participants were a median of 3.6 years post transplant at the time of enrollment. The study’s analysis attempted to determine which patient, transplant, and disease factors might be associated with the late nonmalignant skin changes, according to Dr. Song, a resident dermatologist at Harvard University, Boston, and her colleagues.
Most – 52– of the patients (61.2%) had hematologic malignancies; 12 patients (14.1%) received their transplant for bone marrow failure, and 11 patients (12.5%) had immunodeficiency. Three patients (3.5%) received HSCT for other malignancies, and seven (8.2%) for nonmalignant diseases.
Diffuse hair thinning was seen in 13 (62%) of the 21 patients who had alopecia, while 11 (52%) of the patients with alopecia had an androgenetic hair loss pattern. Chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD), skin chronic GVHD, a HSCT regimen that included busulfan conditioning, and a family history of early male-pattern alopecia were all significantly associated with post-HSCT permanent alopecia (P less than .05 for all).
The patients with androgenetic alopecia may be experiencing an accelerated time course of a condition to which they are already genetically disposed, noted Dr. Song and her colleagues.
Psoriasis was commonly seen on the scalp, affecting 11 of the 14 patients with psoriasis (79%), and involved the face in five of the patients (36%). Just one patient had psoriasis elsewhere on the body. There was a nonsignificant trend towards human leukocyte antigen mismatch among patients who had psoriasis. Although “psoriasis may be a marker of persistent immune dysregulation,” the investigators said, they did not identify any associated risk factors that would point toward this mechanism in their analysis.
Twelve patients (14%) had vitiligo, with halo nevi seen in four of these patients. Children who were younger than age 10 years and those who received their transplant for primary immunodeficiency were significantly more likely to have vitiligo (P less than .05 for both). Specific possible mechanisms triggering vitiligo could include thymic dysfunction resulting in loss of self-tolerance, and donor alloreactivity against the patient’s host antigens, according to the authors.
Nail changes such as pterygium and nail pitting, ridging, or thickening were seen in just five patients, all of whom had chronic GVHD of the skin. “Nail changes are likely a result of persistent inflammation and immune dysregulation from chronic GVHD,” said Dr. Song.
These late effects “can significantly impact patients’ quality of life,” according to the authors, who called for larger studies that follow pediatric HSCT patients longitudinally, beginning before the transplant – and for more investigation into the pathogenesis of specific late effects.
Dr. Song reported no relevant conflicts of interest.
[email protected]
On Twitter @karioakes
CHICAGO – Late dermatologic manifestations in children who have received hematopoietic stem cell transplants may be more common than previously thought, according to results of a new study.
Johanna Song, MD, and her collaborators reported that, in their prospective pediatric study, 25% of patients had permanent alopecia and 16% had psoriasis, noting that late nonmalignant skin effects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have been studied primarily retrospectively, and in adults. Vitiligo and nail changes were also seen.
In a poster presentation at the World Congress of Dermatology, Dr. Song and her colleagues noted that these figures are higher than the previously reported pediatric rates of 1.7% for vitiligo and 15.6% for permanent alopecia. “Early recognition of these late effects can facilitate prompt and appropriate treatment, if desired,” they said.
The single-center, cross-sectional cohort study tracked pediatric patients over an 18-month period and included patients who were at least 1 year post allogeneic HSCT and had not relapsed. Patients who were not English speaking were excluded.
The median age of the 85 patients enrolled in the study was 13.8 years, and participants were a median of 3.6 years post transplant at the time of enrollment. The study’s analysis attempted to determine which patient, transplant, and disease factors might be associated with the late nonmalignant skin changes, according to Dr. Song, a resident dermatologist at Harvard University, Boston, and her colleagues.
Most – 52– of the patients (61.2%) had hematologic malignancies; 12 patients (14.1%) received their transplant for bone marrow failure, and 11 patients (12.5%) had immunodeficiency. Three patients (3.5%) received HSCT for other malignancies, and seven (8.2%) for nonmalignant diseases.
Diffuse hair thinning was seen in 13 (62%) of the 21 patients who had alopecia, while 11 (52%) of the patients with alopecia had an androgenetic hair loss pattern. Chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD), skin chronic GVHD, a HSCT regimen that included busulfan conditioning, and a family history of early male-pattern alopecia were all significantly associated with post-HSCT permanent alopecia (P less than .05 for all).
The patients with androgenetic alopecia may be experiencing an accelerated time course of a condition to which they are already genetically disposed, noted Dr. Song and her colleagues.
Psoriasis was commonly seen on the scalp, affecting 11 of the 14 patients with psoriasis (79%), and involved the face in five of the patients (36%). Just one patient had psoriasis elsewhere on the body. There was a nonsignificant trend towards human leukocyte antigen mismatch among patients who had psoriasis. Although “psoriasis may be a marker of persistent immune dysregulation,” the investigators said, they did not identify any associated risk factors that would point toward this mechanism in their analysis.
Twelve patients (14%) had vitiligo, with halo nevi seen in four of these patients. Children who were younger than age 10 years and those who received their transplant for primary immunodeficiency were significantly more likely to have vitiligo (P less than .05 for both). Specific possible mechanisms triggering vitiligo could include thymic dysfunction resulting in loss of self-tolerance, and donor alloreactivity against the patient’s host antigens, according to the authors.
Nail changes such as pterygium and nail pitting, ridging, or thickening were seen in just five patients, all of whom had chronic GVHD of the skin. “Nail changes are likely a result of persistent inflammation and immune dysregulation from chronic GVHD,” said Dr. Song.
These late effects “can significantly impact patients’ quality of life,” according to the authors, who called for larger studies that follow pediatric HSCT patients longitudinally, beginning before the transplant – and for more investigation into the pathogenesis of specific late effects.
Dr. Song reported no relevant conflicts of interest.
[email protected]
On Twitter @karioakes
AT WCPD 2017
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Permanent alopecia was seen in 25% of patients, and 16% had psoriasis a median of 3.6 years after transplant.
Data source: A single-center prospective study of 85 children in routine post-HSCT follow-up.
Disclosures: Dr. Song reported no conflicts of interest.
Adalimumab for Hidradenitis Suppurativa
We applaud Kimball et al1 on their report that adalimumab demonstrated clinical improvement in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) versus placebo in 2 phase 3 trials. Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic relapsing condition with painful subcutaneous abscesses, malodorous drainage, sinus tract formation, and scarring that typically occurs in the axillae and anogenital region. It impairs the quality of life for these patients, as evidenced by higher Dermatology Life Quality Index scores compared to psoriasis, pimples, hand rash, atopic eczema, or control.2
The exact pathogenesis of HS is unknown but likely involves a complex interaction of genetic, hormonal, immunologic, and environmental factors.3 The levels of inflammatory cytokines are elevated in HS lesions, specifically IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor α, IL-10, and CXCL9, as well as monokines from IFN-γ, IL-11, and IL-17A. Additionally, the dermis of affected regions contains IL-12– and IL-23–containing macrophages along with IL-17–producing T cells.3 These findings reveal many potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of HS.
PIONEER I and PIONEER II are similarly designed 36-week phase 3 trials of 633 patients with HS who were unresponsive to oral antibiotic treatment.1 By week 12, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving adalimumab demonstrated clinical improvement (≥50% reduction in total abscess and nodule count) compared to placebo in both trials (PIONEER I: 41.8% vs 26.0%, P=.003; PIONEER II: 58.9% vs 27.6%, P<.001). Secondary end points (inflammatory-nodule count, pain score, and disease severity) were only achieved in PIONEER II. The difference in clinical improvement between the trials is likely due to higher baseline disease severity in the HS patients in PIONEER I versus PIONEER II. No new safety risks were reported and were in accordance with prior adalimumab trials for other diseases. Notably, 10 paradoxical psoriasislike eruptions were reported.
Adalimumab is the first and only US Food and Drug Administration–approved therapy for HS. Further understanding of the pathogenesis of HS may result in additional biologic treatments for HS. We encourage the manufacturers of other biologic therapies, such as infliximab,4 ustekinumab,5 anakinra,6 secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab, to consider conducting further clinical trials in HS to enhance the therapeutic options available for this debilitating disease.
- Kimball AB, Okun MM, Williams DA, et al. Two Phase 3 trials of adalimumab for hidradenitis suppurativa. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:422-434.
- Vinding GR, Knudsen KM, Ellervik C, et al. Self-reported skin morbidities and health-related quality of life: a population-based nested case-control study. Dermatology. 2014;228:261-268.
- Deckers IE, van der Zee HH, Prens EP. Epidemiology of hidradenitis suppurativa: prevalence, pathogenesis, and factors associated with the development of HS. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2014;3:54-60.
- Ingram JR, Woo PN, Chua SL, et al. Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa: a Cochrane systematic review incorporating GRADE assessment of evidence quality. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174:970-978.
- Blok JL, Li K, Brodmerkel C, et al. Ustekinumab in hidradenitis suppurativa: clinical results and a search for potential biomarkers in serum. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174:839-846.
- Tzanetakou V, Kanni T, Giatrakou S, et al. Safety and efficacy of anakinra in severe hidradenitis suppurativa: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:52-59.
We applaud Kimball et al1 on their report that adalimumab demonstrated clinical improvement in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) versus placebo in 2 phase 3 trials. Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic relapsing condition with painful subcutaneous abscesses, malodorous drainage, sinus tract formation, and scarring that typically occurs in the axillae and anogenital region. It impairs the quality of life for these patients, as evidenced by higher Dermatology Life Quality Index scores compared to psoriasis, pimples, hand rash, atopic eczema, or control.2
The exact pathogenesis of HS is unknown but likely involves a complex interaction of genetic, hormonal, immunologic, and environmental factors.3 The levels of inflammatory cytokines are elevated in HS lesions, specifically IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor α, IL-10, and CXCL9, as well as monokines from IFN-γ, IL-11, and IL-17A. Additionally, the dermis of affected regions contains IL-12– and IL-23–containing macrophages along with IL-17–producing T cells.3 These findings reveal many potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of HS.
PIONEER I and PIONEER II are similarly designed 36-week phase 3 trials of 633 patients with HS who were unresponsive to oral antibiotic treatment.1 By week 12, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving adalimumab demonstrated clinical improvement (≥50% reduction in total abscess and nodule count) compared to placebo in both trials (PIONEER I: 41.8% vs 26.0%, P=.003; PIONEER II: 58.9% vs 27.6%, P<.001). Secondary end points (inflammatory-nodule count, pain score, and disease severity) were only achieved in PIONEER II. The difference in clinical improvement between the trials is likely due to higher baseline disease severity in the HS patients in PIONEER I versus PIONEER II. No new safety risks were reported and were in accordance with prior adalimumab trials for other diseases. Notably, 10 paradoxical psoriasislike eruptions were reported.
Adalimumab is the first and only US Food and Drug Administration–approved therapy for HS. Further understanding of the pathogenesis of HS may result in additional biologic treatments for HS. We encourage the manufacturers of other biologic therapies, such as infliximab,4 ustekinumab,5 anakinra,6 secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab, to consider conducting further clinical trials in HS to enhance the therapeutic options available for this debilitating disease.
We applaud Kimball et al1 on their report that adalimumab demonstrated clinical improvement in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) versus placebo in 2 phase 3 trials. Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic relapsing condition with painful subcutaneous abscesses, malodorous drainage, sinus tract formation, and scarring that typically occurs in the axillae and anogenital region. It impairs the quality of life for these patients, as evidenced by higher Dermatology Life Quality Index scores compared to psoriasis, pimples, hand rash, atopic eczema, or control.2
The exact pathogenesis of HS is unknown but likely involves a complex interaction of genetic, hormonal, immunologic, and environmental factors.3 The levels of inflammatory cytokines are elevated in HS lesions, specifically IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor α, IL-10, and CXCL9, as well as monokines from IFN-γ, IL-11, and IL-17A. Additionally, the dermis of affected regions contains IL-12– and IL-23–containing macrophages along with IL-17–producing T cells.3 These findings reveal many potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of HS.
PIONEER I and PIONEER II are similarly designed 36-week phase 3 trials of 633 patients with HS who were unresponsive to oral antibiotic treatment.1 By week 12, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving adalimumab demonstrated clinical improvement (≥50% reduction in total abscess and nodule count) compared to placebo in both trials (PIONEER I: 41.8% vs 26.0%, P=.003; PIONEER II: 58.9% vs 27.6%, P<.001). Secondary end points (inflammatory-nodule count, pain score, and disease severity) were only achieved in PIONEER II. The difference in clinical improvement between the trials is likely due to higher baseline disease severity in the HS patients in PIONEER I versus PIONEER II. No new safety risks were reported and were in accordance with prior adalimumab trials for other diseases. Notably, 10 paradoxical psoriasislike eruptions were reported.
Adalimumab is the first and only US Food and Drug Administration–approved therapy for HS. Further understanding of the pathogenesis of HS may result in additional biologic treatments for HS. We encourage the manufacturers of other biologic therapies, such as infliximab,4 ustekinumab,5 anakinra,6 secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab, to consider conducting further clinical trials in HS to enhance the therapeutic options available for this debilitating disease.
- Kimball AB, Okun MM, Williams DA, et al. Two Phase 3 trials of adalimumab for hidradenitis suppurativa. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:422-434.
- Vinding GR, Knudsen KM, Ellervik C, et al. Self-reported skin morbidities and health-related quality of life: a population-based nested case-control study. Dermatology. 2014;228:261-268.
- Deckers IE, van der Zee HH, Prens EP. Epidemiology of hidradenitis suppurativa: prevalence, pathogenesis, and factors associated with the development of HS. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2014;3:54-60.
- Ingram JR, Woo PN, Chua SL, et al. Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa: a Cochrane systematic review incorporating GRADE assessment of evidence quality. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174:970-978.
- Blok JL, Li K, Brodmerkel C, et al. Ustekinumab in hidradenitis suppurativa: clinical results and a search for potential biomarkers in serum. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174:839-846.
- Tzanetakou V, Kanni T, Giatrakou S, et al. Safety and efficacy of anakinra in severe hidradenitis suppurativa: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:52-59.
- Kimball AB, Okun MM, Williams DA, et al. Two Phase 3 trials of adalimumab for hidradenitis suppurativa. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:422-434.
- Vinding GR, Knudsen KM, Ellervik C, et al. Self-reported skin morbidities and health-related quality of life: a population-based nested case-control study. Dermatology. 2014;228:261-268.
- Deckers IE, van der Zee HH, Prens EP. Epidemiology of hidradenitis suppurativa: prevalence, pathogenesis, and factors associated with the development of HS. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2014;3:54-60.
- Ingram JR, Woo PN, Chua SL, et al. Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa: a Cochrane systematic review incorporating GRADE assessment of evidence quality. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174:970-978.
- Blok JL, Li K, Brodmerkel C, et al. Ustekinumab in hidradenitis suppurativa: clinical results and a search for potential biomarkers in serum. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174:839-846.
- Tzanetakou V, Kanni T, Giatrakou S, et al. Safety and efficacy of anakinra in severe hidradenitis suppurativa: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:52-59.
First interchangeability study for an adalimumab biosimilar has begun
The VOLTAIRE-X study of a biosimilar candidate for adalimumab (Humira) for chronic plaque psoriasis has enrolled its first patient, announced Boehringer Ingelheim, the biosimilar’s developer, on July 27.
This is the first study in the United States to investigate whether a biosimilar candidate should be granted an interchangeability designation with adalimumab. The candidate, BI 695501, is up against adalimumab’s 40-mg injection.
In VOLTAIRE-X, some patients will alternate between adalimumab and BI 695501, and others will take adalimumab continuously. The study will compare the pharmacokinetics, clinical outcomes, safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy between the two groups of patients. The estimated enrollment of adult patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis is 240, and the study is expected to conclude in July 2019.
A phase 3 study of BI 695501’s performance for rheumatoid arthritis patients, completed in 2016, demonstrated similar efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity.
The VOLTAIRE-X study of a biosimilar candidate for adalimumab (Humira) for chronic plaque psoriasis has enrolled its first patient, announced Boehringer Ingelheim, the biosimilar’s developer, on July 27.
This is the first study in the United States to investigate whether a biosimilar candidate should be granted an interchangeability designation with adalimumab. The candidate, BI 695501, is up against adalimumab’s 40-mg injection.
In VOLTAIRE-X, some patients will alternate between adalimumab and BI 695501, and others will take adalimumab continuously. The study will compare the pharmacokinetics, clinical outcomes, safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy between the two groups of patients. The estimated enrollment of adult patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis is 240, and the study is expected to conclude in July 2019.
A phase 3 study of BI 695501’s performance for rheumatoid arthritis patients, completed in 2016, demonstrated similar efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity.
The VOLTAIRE-X study of a biosimilar candidate for adalimumab (Humira) for chronic plaque psoriasis has enrolled its first patient, announced Boehringer Ingelheim, the biosimilar’s developer, on July 27.
This is the first study in the United States to investigate whether a biosimilar candidate should be granted an interchangeability designation with adalimumab. The candidate, BI 695501, is up against adalimumab’s 40-mg injection.
In VOLTAIRE-X, some patients will alternate between adalimumab and BI 695501, and others will take adalimumab continuously. The study will compare the pharmacokinetics, clinical outcomes, safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy between the two groups of patients. The estimated enrollment of adult patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis is 240, and the study is expected to conclude in July 2019.
A phase 3 study of BI 695501’s performance for rheumatoid arthritis patients, completed in 2016, demonstrated similar efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity.
Unresolved fatigue lingers for most PsA patients
MADRID – Fatigue is an important symptom in patients with psoriatic arthritis but often goes unaddressed when treatment only involves disease modifying drugs.
A survey of more than 1,000 patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Denmark found that more than half had moderate or severe levels of fatigue, and a principal component analysis of the sources of fatigue found three factors responsible for the majority of reported patient fatigue: chronic inflammation, chronic pain, and chronification of the PsA, Tanja S. Jørgensen, PhD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology.
“Pain is the most important symptom in patients with psoriatic arthritis, but fatigue is second-most important. It has a huge impact on patient quality of life,” she said.
“Just treating inflammation doesn’t do it all. We need to do more, think differently, think outside the box” of relying primarily on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, especially biological drugs, to resolve symptoms in PsA patients. “We should not think that biologicals do it all.”
The upshot is that PsA patients may have their inflammatory markers under control with treatment but still report that they don’t feel well, have pain, are tired, and have no energy.
But Dr. Jørgensen admitted that she couldn’t say with any certainty what additional interventions might help resolve pain and fatigue in PsA patients.
“I tell them to walk and be active; I think that may help. But we don’t really know what to do,” she said in an interview.
Her study included 1,062 PsA patients enrolled during December 2013-December 2014 in the Danish DANBIO registry of patients with inflammatory arthritides who received treatment with a biological drug. These participants also agreed to both complete a painDETECT Questionnaire and to rate their fatigue on a visual analog scale.
Dr. Jørgensen and her associates designated a visual analog scale score of at least 57 out of 100 as representing moderate or severe fatigue and found that 542 (51%) of the patients had fatigue self-ratings that fell in this range. Patients with this higher fatigue level also had significantly worse PsA with significantly higher numbers of swollen and tender joints, higher painDETECT scores, and higher scores on their Health Assessment Questionnaire and their 28-joint Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein.
When the researchers ran a principal component analysis on these data, they identified three primary factors contributing to fatigue. Chronic inflammation contributed 31% of the fatigue effect, chronification contributed 17%, and chronic pain contributed 15%, Dr. Jørgensen reported.
Dr. Jørgensen has received research support from AbbVie, Biogen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB.
[email protected]
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
MADRID – Fatigue is an important symptom in patients with psoriatic arthritis but often goes unaddressed when treatment only involves disease modifying drugs.
A survey of more than 1,000 patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Denmark found that more than half had moderate or severe levels of fatigue, and a principal component analysis of the sources of fatigue found three factors responsible for the majority of reported patient fatigue: chronic inflammation, chronic pain, and chronification of the PsA, Tanja S. Jørgensen, PhD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology.
“Pain is the most important symptom in patients with psoriatic arthritis, but fatigue is second-most important. It has a huge impact on patient quality of life,” she said.
“Just treating inflammation doesn’t do it all. We need to do more, think differently, think outside the box” of relying primarily on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, especially biological drugs, to resolve symptoms in PsA patients. “We should not think that biologicals do it all.”
The upshot is that PsA patients may have their inflammatory markers under control with treatment but still report that they don’t feel well, have pain, are tired, and have no energy.
But Dr. Jørgensen admitted that she couldn’t say with any certainty what additional interventions might help resolve pain and fatigue in PsA patients.
“I tell them to walk and be active; I think that may help. But we don’t really know what to do,” she said in an interview.
Her study included 1,062 PsA patients enrolled during December 2013-December 2014 in the Danish DANBIO registry of patients with inflammatory arthritides who received treatment with a biological drug. These participants also agreed to both complete a painDETECT Questionnaire and to rate their fatigue on a visual analog scale.
Dr. Jørgensen and her associates designated a visual analog scale score of at least 57 out of 100 as representing moderate or severe fatigue and found that 542 (51%) of the patients had fatigue self-ratings that fell in this range. Patients with this higher fatigue level also had significantly worse PsA with significantly higher numbers of swollen and tender joints, higher painDETECT scores, and higher scores on their Health Assessment Questionnaire and their 28-joint Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein.
When the researchers ran a principal component analysis on these data, they identified three primary factors contributing to fatigue. Chronic inflammation contributed 31% of the fatigue effect, chronification contributed 17%, and chronic pain contributed 15%, Dr. Jørgensen reported.
Dr. Jørgensen has received research support from AbbVie, Biogen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB.
[email protected]
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
MADRID – Fatigue is an important symptom in patients with psoriatic arthritis but often goes unaddressed when treatment only involves disease modifying drugs.
A survey of more than 1,000 patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Denmark found that more than half had moderate or severe levels of fatigue, and a principal component analysis of the sources of fatigue found three factors responsible for the majority of reported patient fatigue: chronic inflammation, chronic pain, and chronification of the PsA, Tanja S. Jørgensen, PhD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology.
“Pain is the most important symptom in patients with psoriatic arthritis, but fatigue is second-most important. It has a huge impact on patient quality of life,” she said.
“Just treating inflammation doesn’t do it all. We need to do more, think differently, think outside the box” of relying primarily on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, especially biological drugs, to resolve symptoms in PsA patients. “We should not think that biologicals do it all.”
The upshot is that PsA patients may have their inflammatory markers under control with treatment but still report that they don’t feel well, have pain, are tired, and have no energy.
But Dr. Jørgensen admitted that she couldn’t say with any certainty what additional interventions might help resolve pain and fatigue in PsA patients.
“I tell them to walk and be active; I think that may help. But we don’t really know what to do,” she said in an interview.
Her study included 1,062 PsA patients enrolled during December 2013-December 2014 in the Danish DANBIO registry of patients with inflammatory arthritides who received treatment with a biological drug. These participants also agreed to both complete a painDETECT Questionnaire and to rate their fatigue on a visual analog scale.
Dr. Jørgensen and her associates designated a visual analog scale score of at least 57 out of 100 as representing moderate or severe fatigue and found that 542 (51%) of the patients had fatigue self-ratings that fell in this range. Patients with this higher fatigue level also had significantly worse PsA with significantly higher numbers of swollen and tender joints, higher painDETECT scores, and higher scores on their Health Assessment Questionnaire and their 28-joint Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein.
When the researchers ran a principal component analysis on these data, they identified three primary factors contributing to fatigue. Chronic inflammation contributed 31% of the fatigue effect, chronification contributed 17%, and chronic pain contributed 15%, Dr. Jørgensen reported.
Dr. Jørgensen has received research support from AbbVie, Biogen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB.
[email protected]
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
AT THE EULAR 2017 CONGRESS
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Visual analog scoring showed 51% of patients rated their fatigue as 57 or higher on a 0-100 scale.
Data source: A review of 1,062 Danish psoriatic arthritis patients treated with a biological drug and enrolled in the DANBIO registry
Disclosures: Dr. Jørgensen has received research support from AbbVie, Biogen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB.
Children with psoriasis face multitude of comorbidities
CHICAGO – Children with psoriasis face a multitude of potential problems and comorbidities, ranging from anxiety and depression to obesity and metabolic disease, so early and proactive identification is key.
“These children are more likely to engage in high-risk behavior such as use of alcohol, tobacco, and drugs – a trend that continues into adult ages,” Kelly M. Cordoro, MD, said at the World Congress for Pediatric Dermatology. “They also have a higher association with inflammatory bowel disease, among other conditions. Those of us who care for pediatric psoriasis patients are on the front lines of recognition of these potential comorbidities, which allow for, ideally, prevention and certainly, early intervention.”
Obesity ranks as the most well understood comorbidity of psoriasis in children. Study after study has demonstrated this association. In addition, obese children with psoriasis may also harbor components of the metabolic syndrome – hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. “They’re not as much at risk for metabolic syndrome in the absence of obesity, but there’s still a small signal,” Dr. Cordoro said. “We ask ourselves this question as clinicians: Are these pediatric patients at risk for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease as they get older? In other words, what is the health of a 6-year-old, obese child with severe psoriasis, who may also have other components of the metabolic syndrome, going to be like when he is 35 or 40? Are these the children who go on to have cardiovascular events as documented in adult studies of psoriasis?”
To date, several studies have identified a clear link between psoriasis and obesity, and between psoriasis and hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia in certain populations. “There is a dose-response effect,” Dr. Cordoro said. “The more severe the psoriasis, the more likely the patient is to be obese, and vice versa.” In one study, researchers analyzed 409 psoriasis patients up to age 17 years in nine countries (JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:166-76). They concluded that globally, children with psoriasis have excess adiposity and increased central adiposity regardless of psoriasis severity. The researchers used multiple measures of adiposity, not just body mass index, but also waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio. “Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio are surrogates for central and visceral adiposity,” said Dr. Cordoro, who was involved with the study. “And central adiposity may be a more sensitive indicator of metabolic disease and cardiovascular risk than BMI [body mass index] alone.”
Another study demonstrated that high adiposity preceded psoriasis by up to 2 years in 93% of overweight or obese psoriatic children (JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150:573-4).
In a more recent analysis, researchers evaluated lipid function in 44 psoriatic children (J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136[1]:67-73). Compared with age-matched controls, children with psoriasis were found to have higher waist-to-hip ratio, higher insulin resistance, and 27% were obese. “There was no difference in fasting lipid levels but the blood profiles had atherogenic markers that are worrisome for ongoing risk for atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease,” Dr. Cordoro said.
Research among adults has demonstrated that psoriasis confers an independent risk of atherosclerosis, MI, stroke, and early cardiovascular-related mortality, the so-called “psoriatic march.” Theoretically, Dr. Cordoro said, severe psoriasis sets up a state of chronic systemic inflammation, which leads to insulin resistance, which predisposes affected individuals to endothelial dysfunction, and eventually can lead to atherosclerosis. “When atherosclerosis becomes unstable, now you’ve gone from having severe psoriasis into a situation where the chronic inflammation may have predisposed you to having a thrombotic event such as a heart attack or stroke,” she said. “Obesity replicates that same pattern. What does this all mean? Is this real or is this just a theory? We don’t know, but it’s certainly biologically plausible. It’s not been proven with long-term prospective studies, which we need.”
Dr. Cordoro went on to discuss the importance of assessing young psoriasis patients for psychiatric and emotional comorbidities, including anxiety, depression, and eating disorders. “These kids can become socially isolated, which can lead to more downstream effects: more anxiety, more depression, sometimes overeating and obesity,” she said. “It’s not only that the patient has situational anxiety or depression, the notion that ‘My skin looks terrible. I’m really depressed about it;’ it’s more than that. It turns out that the same inflammatory milieu in psoriasis lesions can be replicated in the brain inflammatory milieu in patients with depression and other psychiatric disorders. That’s fascinating to recognize that these comorbidities can be intrinsic. There’s a biological basis and not just a downstream effect.”
She advises clinicians who care for children with psoriasis to keep potential comorbidities in mind, and to make sure families understand that there can be psychiatric, emotional, and physical consequences to undertreated disease. “We do not yet know how to risk stratify these patients. At the very least, you want to identify overweight or obese children with moderate to severe disease for early intervention,” Dr. Cordoro said. “Weight loss and lifestyle interventions are the hardest goals to accomplish but are really critical. Prevention is the best strategy. We can help ourselves and help our patients by referring to obesity and nutrition experts who can not only help the child but get the entire family involved.”
In a consensus statement published online in JAMA Dermatology, a multidisciplinary panel of experts including Dr. Cordoro offer an evidence- and consensus-based approach to screening children with psoriasis, based on a review of 153 manuscripts in the medical literature. The panel recommends that all psoriasis patients 2-21 years of age should undergo annual measurements of blood pressure and BMI, and screenings for arthritis and mood disorders. “These don’t have to be formal mood disorder screens,” Dr. Cordoro said. “They can be informal questioning about anxiety and depression, like ‘How is your psoriasis impacting you? How do you feel about your psoriasis? What do you say when people ask you about your psoriasis?’ It’s also important to ask overweight patients what they’re doing to keep their weight in check. Oftentimes when you ask a question about mood or impact of disease or stigma or bullying, the child will be completely silent and either stay silent or start crying or start telling you their stories. It’s really important to ask, because it validates that their concerns are more than just about vanity but about their overall health, and that is a critical difference.”
Dr. Cordoro disclosed that she is a consultant for Pfizer and Valeant.
CHICAGO – Children with psoriasis face a multitude of potential problems and comorbidities, ranging from anxiety and depression to obesity and metabolic disease, so early and proactive identification is key.
“These children are more likely to engage in high-risk behavior such as use of alcohol, tobacco, and drugs – a trend that continues into adult ages,” Kelly M. Cordoro, MD, said at the World Congress for Pediatric Dermatology. “They also have a higher association with inflammatory bowel disease, among other conditions. Those of us who care for pediatric psoriasis patients are on the front lines of recognition of these potential comorbidities, which allow for, ideally, prevention and certainly, early intervention.”
Obesity ranks as the most well understood comorbidity of psoriasis in children. Study after study has demonstrated this association. In addition, obese children with psoriasis may also harbor components of the metabolic syndrome – hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. “They’re not as much at risk for metabolic syndrome in the absence of obesity, but there’s still a small signal,” Dr. Cordoro said. “We ask ourselves this question as clinicians: Are these pediatric patients at risk for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease as they get older? In other words, what is the health of a 6-year-old, obese child with severe psoriasis, who may also have other components of the metabolic syndrome, going to be like when he is 35 or 40? Are these the children who go on to have cardiovascular events as documented in adult studies of psoriasis?”
To date, several studies have identified a clear link between psoriasis and obesity, and between psoriasis and hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia in certain populations. “There is a dose-response effect,” Dr. Cordoro said. “The more severe the psoriasis, the more likely the patient is to be obese, and vice versa.” In one study, researchers analyzed 409 psoriasis patients up to age 17 years in nine countries (JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:166-76). They concluded that globally, children with psoriasis have excess adiposity and increased central adiposity regardless of psoriasis severity. The researchers used multiple measures of adiposity, not just body mass index, but also waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio. “Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio are surrogates for central and visceral adiposity,” said Dr. Cordoro, who was involved with the study. “And central adiposity may be a more sensitive indicator of metabolic disease and cardiovascular risk than BMI [body mass index] alone.”
Another study demonstrated that high adiposity preceded psoriasis by up to 2 years in 93% of overweight or obese psoriatic children (JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150:573-4).
In a more recent analysis, researchers evaluated lipid function in 44 psoriatic children (J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136[1]:67-73). Compared with age-matched controls, children with psoriasis were found to have higher waist-to-hip ratio, higher insulin resistance, and 27% were obese. “There was no difference in fasting lipid levels but the blood profiles had atherogenic markers that are worrisome for ongoing risk for atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease,” Dr. Cordoro said.
Research among adults has demonstrated that psoriasis confers an independent risk of atherosclerosis, MI, stroke, and early cardiovascular-related mortality, the so-called “psoriatic march.” Theoretically, Dr. Cordoro said, severe psoriasis sets up a state of chronic systemic inflammation, which leads to insulin resistance, which predisposes affected individuals to endothelial dysfunction, and eventually can lead to atherosclerosis. “When atherosclerosis becomes unstable, now you’ve gone from having severe psoriasis into a situation where the chronic inflammation may have predisposed you to having a thrombotic event such as a heart attack or stroke,” she said. “Obesity replicates that same pattern. What does this all mean? Is this real or is this just a theory? We don’t know, but it’s certainly biologically plausible. It’s not been proven with long-term prospective studies, which we need.”
Dr. Cordoro went on to discuss the importance of assessing young psoriasis patients for psychiatric and emotional comorbidities, including anxiety, depression, and eating disorders. “These kids can become socially isolated, which can lead to more downstream effects: more anxiety, more depression, sometimes overeating and obesity,” she said. “It’s not only that the patient has situational anxiety or depression, the notion that ‘My skin looks terrible. I’m really depressed about it;’ it’s more than that. It turns out that the same inflammatory milieu in psoriasis lesions can be replicated in the brain inflammatory milieu in patients with depression and other psychiatric disorders. That’s fascinating to recognize that these comorbidities can be intrinsic. There’s a biological basis and not just a downstream effect.”
She advises clinicians who care for children with psoriasis to keep potential comorbidities in mind, and to make sure families understand that there can be psychiatric, emotional, and physical consequences to undertreated disease. “We do not yet know how to risk stratify these patients. At the very least, you want to identify overweight or obese children with moderate to severe disease for early intervention,” Dr. Cordoro said. “Weight loss and lifestyle interventions are the hardest goals to accomplish but are really critical. Prevention is the best strategy. We can help ourselves and help our patients by referring to obesity and nutrition experts who can not only help the child but get the entire family involved.”
In a consensus statement published online in JAMA Dermatology, a multidisciplinary panel of experts including Dr. Cordoro offer an evidence- and consensus-based approach to screening children with psoriasis, based on a review of 153 manuscripts in the medical literature. The panel recommends that all psoriasis patients 2-21 years of age should undergo annual measurements of blood pressure and BMI, and screenings for arthritis and mood disorders. “These don’t have to be formal mood disorder screens,” Dr. Cordoro said. “They can be informal questioning about anxiety and depression, like ‘How is your psoriasis impacting you? How do you feel about your psoriasis? What do you say when people ask you about your psoriasis?’ It’s also important to ask overweight patients what they’re doing to keep their weight in check. Oftentimes when you ask a question about mood or impact of disease or stigma or bullying, the child will be completely silent and either stay silent or start crying or start telling you their stories. It’s really important to ask, because it validates that their concerns are more than just about vanity but about their overall health, and that is a critical difference.”
Dr. Cordoro disclosed that she is a consultant for Pfizer and Valeant.
CHICAGO – Children with psoriasis face a multitude of potential problems and comorbidities, ranging from anxiety and depression to obesity and metabolic disease, so early and proactive identification is key.
“These children are more likely to engage in high-risk behavior such as use of alcohol, tobacco, and drugs – a trend that continues into adult ages,” Kelly M. Cordoro, MD, said at the World Congress for Pediatric Dermatology. “They also have a higher association with inflammatory bowel disease, among other conditions. Those of us who care for pediatric psoriasis patients are on the front lines of recognition of these potential comorbidities, which allow for, ideally, prevention and certainly, early intervention.”
Obesity ranks as the most well understood comorbidity of psoriasis in children. Study after study has demonstrated this association. In addition, obese children with psoriasis may also harbor components of the metabolic syndrome – hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. “They’re not as much at risk for metabolic syndrome in the absence of obesity, but there’s still a small signal,” Dr. Cordoro said. “We ask ourselves this question as clinicians: Are these pediatric patients at risk for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease as they get older? In other words, what is the health of a 6-year-old, obese child with severe psoriasis, who may also have other components of the metabolic syndrome, going to be like when he is 35 or 40? Are these the children who go on to have cardiovascular events as documented in adult studies of psoriasis?”
To date, several studies have identified a clear link between psoriasis and obesity, and between psoriasis and hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia in certain populations. “There is a dose-response effect,” Dr. Cordoro said. “The more severe the psoriasis, the more likely the patient is to be obese, and vice versa.” In one study, researchers analyzed 409 psoriasis patients up to age 17 years in nine countries (JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:166-76). They concluded that globally, children with psoriasis have excess adiposity and increased central adiposity regardless of psoriasis severity. The researchers used multiple measures of adiposity, not just body mass index, but also waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio. “Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio are surrogates for central and visceral adiposity,” said Dr. Cordoro, who was involved with the study. “And central adiposity may be a more sensitive indicator of metabolic disease and cardiovascular risk than BMI [body mass index] alone.”
Another study demonstrated that high adiposity preceded psoriasis by up to 2 years in 93% of overweight or obese psoriatic children (JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150:573-4).
In a more recent analysis, researchers evaluated lipid function in 44 psoriatic children (J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136[1]:67-73). Compared with age-matched controls, children with psoriasis were found to have higher waist-to-hip ratio, higher insulin resistance, and 27% were obese. “There was no difference in fasting lipid levels but the blood profiles had atherogenic markers that are worrisome for ongoing risk for atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease,” Dr. Cordoro said.
Research among adults has demonstrated that psoriasis confers an independent risk of atherosclerosis, MI, stroke, and early cardiovascular-related mortality, the so-called “psoriatic march.” Theoretically, Dr. Cordoro said, severe psoriasis sets up a state of chronic systemic inflammation, which leads to insulin resistance, which predisposes affected individuals to endothelial dysfunction, and eventually can lead to atherosclerosis. “When atherosclerosis becomes unstable, now you’ve gone from having severe psoriasis into a situation where the chronic inflammation may have predisposed you to having a thrombotic event such as a heart attack or stroke,” she said. “Obesity replicates that same pattern. What does this all mean? Is this real or is this just a theory? We don’t know, but it’s certainly biologically plausible. It’s not been proven with long-term prospective studies, which we need.”
Dr. Cordoro went on to discuss the importance of assessing young psoriasis patients for psychiatric and emotional comorbidities, including anxiety, depression, and eating disorders. “These kids can become socially isolated, which can lead to more downstream effects: more anxiety, more depression, sometimes overeating and obesity,” she said. “It’s not only that the patient has situational anxiety or depression, the notion that ‘My skin looks terrible. I’m really depressed about it;’ it’s more than that. It turns out that the same inflammatory milieu in psoriasis lesions can be replicated in the brain inflammatory milieu in patients with depression and other psychiatric disorders. That’s fascinating to recognize that these comorbidities can be intrinsic. There’s a biological basis and not just a downstream effect.”
She advises clinicians who care for children with psoriasis to keep potential comorbidities in mind, and to make sure families understand that there can be psychiatric, emotional, and physical consequences to undertreated disease. “We do not yet know how to risk stratify these patients. At the very least, you want to identify overweight or obese children with moderate to severe disease for early intervention,” Dr. Cordoro said. “Weight loss and lifestyle interventions are the hardest goals to accomplish but are really critical. Prevention is the best strategy. We can help ourselves and help our patients by referring to obesity and nutrition experts who can not only help the child but get the entire family involved.”
In a consensus statement published online in JAMA Dermatology, a multidisciplinary panel of experts including Dr. Cordoro offer an evidence- and consensus-based approach to screening children with psoriasis, based on a review of 153 manuscripts in the medical literature. The panel recommends that all psoriasis patients 2-21 years of age should undergo annual measurements of blood pressure and BMI, and screenings for arthritis and mood disorders. “These don’t have to be formal mood disorder screens,” Dr. Cordoro said. “They can be informal questioning about anxiety and depression, like ‘How is your psoriasis impacting you? How do you feel about your psoriasis? What do you say when people ask you about your psoriasis?’ It’s also important to ask overweight patients what they’re doing to keep their weight in check. Oftentimes when you ask a question about mood or impact of disease or stigma or bullying, the child will be completely silent and either stay silent or start crying or start telling you their stories. It’s really important to ask, because it validates that their concerns are more than just about vanity but about their overall health, and that is a critical difference.”
Dr. Cordoro disclosed that she is a consultant for Pfizer and Valeant.
AT WCPD 2017
Ixekizumab helps PsA patients who failed a TNFi
MADRID – The anti–interleukin-17 drug ixekizumab, already on the U.S. market for treating psoriasis, showed efficacy and safety for treating psoriatic arthritis in patients who previously failed to respond to or tolerate a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor in a pivotal, phase 3 trial with 363 patients.
Treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with ixekizumab (Taltz) led to improvements, compared with placebo, in arthritis, physical function, and psoriasis. These patients were unresponsive to or intolerant of a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) at rates similar to previously reported response rates for PsA patients who were TNFi naive, Peter Nash, MD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology.
A published report with the data presented by Dr. Nash also recently appeared (Lancet. 2017;389[10086]:2317-27).
Based in part on the results from this trial, as well as results from a companion phase 3 trial that enrolled PsA patients naive to a TNFi (Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan; 6[1]:79-87), the company that markets ixekizumab, Eli Lilly, filed an application with the Food and Drug Administration in early 2017 to have a new label indication for PsA, said a company spokeswoman.
“At least half of PsA patients don’t get at least a 20% improvement [an ACR20 response] on a TNFi, and so they are looking for something else,” explained Mark C. Genovese, MD, professor of medicine and director of the Rheumatology Clinic at Stanford (Calif.) University and a coinvestigator on the trial reported by Dr. Nash. “There is pent up demand” for an alternative to a TNFi for treating PsA, Dr. Genovese said in an interview.
The finding also sets ixekizumab apart from secukinumab (Cosentyx), another interleukin-17 inhibitor that already has FDA approval for treating PsA but that has not been specifically tested in PsA patients who failed or didn’t tolerate a TNFi, he noted.
The SPIRIT-P2 results also showed superior outcomes for patients treated with an ixekizumab injection once every 2 or 4 weeks, compared with placebo, by several secondary measures, including ACR50 and ACR70 rates and minimal disease activity. The ACR70 rate after 24 weeks on treatment was 23% with a dose of ixekizumab every 4 weeks and none with placebo. Minimal disease activity was reached by about a quarter of patients on either dosage of the active drug and by 3% of patients on placebo.
Despite the apparent role for ixekizumab when TNFi treatment fails, the TNFi drug class remains the clear first-line choice for PsA patients who are starting a biological drug for the first time. Not only do the TNFis have a much longer and more extensive track record but they also generally receive better insurance coverage that minimizes out-of-pocket expenses for patients, Dr. Genovese said.
SPIRIT-P2 was sponsored by Eli Lilly, the company that markets ixekizumab. Dr. Nash has been a speaker for or consultant to and has received research funding from Eli Lily and for several other companies. Dr. Genovese has been a consultant to and has received research funding from Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Astellas, Galapagos, Pfizer, and Vertex.
[email protected]
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
MADRID – The anti–interleukin-17 drug ixekizumab, already on the U.S. market for treating psoriasis, showed efficacy and safety for treating psoriatic arthritis in patients who previously failed to respond to or tolerate a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor in a pivotal, phase 3 trial with 363 patients.
Treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with ixekizumab (Taltz) led to improvements, compared with placebo, in arthritis, physical function, and psoriasis. These patients were unresponsive to or intolerant of a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) at rates similar to previously reported response rates for PsA patients who were TNFi naive, Peter Nash, MD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology.
A published report with the data presented by Dr. Nash also recently appeared (Lancet. 2017;389[10086]:2317-27).
Based in part on the results from this trial, as well as results from a companion phase 3 trial that enrolled PsA patients naive to a TNFi (Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan; 6[1]:79-87), the company that markets ixekizumab, Eli Lilly, filed an application with the Food and Drug Administration in early 2017 to have a new label indication for PsA, said a company spokeswoman.
“At least half of PsA patients don’t get at least a 20% improvement [an ACR20 response] on a TNFi, and so they are looking for something else,” explained Mark C. Genovese, MD, professor of medicine and director of the Rheumatology Clinic at Stanford (Calif.) University and a coinvestigator on the trial reported by Dr. Nash. “There is pent up demand” for an alternative to a TNFi for treating PsA, Dr. Genovese said in an interview.
The finding also sets ixekizumab apart from secukinumab (Cosentyx), another interleukin-17 inhibitor that already has FDA approval for treating PsA but that has not been specifically tested in PsA patients who failed or didn’t tolerate a TNFi, he noted.
The SPIRIT-P2 results also showed superior outcomes for patients treated with an ixekizumab injection once every 2 or 4 weeks, compared with placebo, by several secondary measures, including ACR50 and ACR70 rates and minimal disease activity. The ACR70 rate after 24 weeks on treatment was 23% with a dose of ixekizumab every 4 weeks and none with placebo. Minimal disease activity was reached by about a quarter of patients on either dosage of the active drug and by 3% of patients on placebo.
Despite the apparent role for ixekizumab when TNFi treatment fails, the TNFi drug class remains the clear first-line choice for PsA patients who are starting a biological drug for the first time. Not only do the TNFis have a much longer and more extensive track record but they also generally receive better insurance coverage that minimizes out-of-pocket expenses for patients, Dr. Genovese said.
SPIRIT-P2 was sponsored by Eli Lilly, the company that markets ixekizumab. Dr. Nash has been a speaker for or consultant to and has received research funding from Eli Lily and for several other companies. Dr. Genovese has been a consultant to and has received research funding from Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Astellas, Galapagos, Pfizer, and Vertex.
[email protected]
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
MADRID – The anti–interleukin-17 drug ixekizumab, already on the U.S. market for treating psoriasis, showed efficacy and safety for treating psoriatic arthritis in patients who previously failed to respond to or tolerate a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor in a pivotal, phase 3 trial with 363 patients.
Treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with ixekizumab (Taltz) led to improvements, compared with placebo, in arthritis, physical function, and psoriasis. These patients were unresponsive to or intolerant of a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) at rates similar to previously reported response rates for PsA patients who were TNFi naive, Peter Nash, MD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology.
A published report with the data presented by Dr. Nash also recently appeared (Lancet. 2017;389[10086]:2317-27).
Based in part on the results from this trial, as well as results from a companion phase 3 trial that enrolled PsA patients naive to a TNFi (Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan; 6[1]:79-87), the company that markets ixekizumab, Eli Lilly, filed an application with the Food and Drug Administration in early 2017 to have a new label indication for PsA, said a company spokeswoman.
“At least half of PsA patients don’t get at least a 20% improvement [an ACR20 response] on a TNFi, and so they are looking for something else,” explained Mark C. Genovese, MD, professor of medicine and director of the Rheumatology Clinic at Stanford (Calif.) University and a coinvestigator on the trial reported by Dr. Nash. “There is pent up demand” for an alternative to a TNFi for treating PsA, Dr. Genovese said in an interview.
The finding also sets ixekizumab apart from secukinumab (Cosentyx), another interleukin-17 inhibitor that already has FDA approval for treating PsA but that has not been specifically tested in PsA patients who failed or didn’t tolerate a TNFi, he noted.
The SPIRIT-P2 results also showed superior outcomes for patients treated with an ixekizumab injection once every 2 or 4 weeks, compared with placebo, by several secondary measures, including ACR50 and ACR70 rates and minimal disease activity. The ACR70 rate after 24 weeks on treatment was 23% with a dose of ixekizumab every 4 weeks and none with placebo. Minimal disease activity was reached by about a quarter of patients on either dosage of the active drug and by 3% of patients on placebo.
Despite the apparent role for ixekizumab when TNFi treatment fails, the TNFi drug class remains the clear first-line choice for PsA patients who are starting a biological drug for the first time. Not only do the TNFis have a much longer and more extensive track record but they also generally receive better insurance coverage that minimizes out-of-pocket expenses for patients, Dr. Genovese said.
SPIRIT-P2 was sponsored by Eli Lilly, the company that markets ixekizumab. Dr. Nash has been a speaker for or consultant to and has received research funding from Eli Lily and for several other companies. Dr. Genovese has been a consultant to and has received research funding from Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Astellas, Galapagos, Pfizer, and Vertex.
[email protected]
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
AT THE EULAR 2017 CONGRESS
Key clinical point:
Major finding: The ACR20 rate after 24 weeks of treatment was 53% with monthly ixekizumab and 20% on placebo.
Data source: The SPIRIT-P2 trial, a phase 3 multicenter trial with 363 patients.
Disclosures: SPIRIT-P2 was sponsored by Eli Lilly, the company that markets ixekizumab (Taltz). Dr. Nash has been a speaker for or consultant to and has received research funding from Eli Lily and for several other companies. Dr. Genovese has been a consultant to and has received research funding from Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Astellas, Galapagos, Pfizer, and Vertex.
First IL-23 blocker, guselkumab, earns FDA approval for psoriasis
, based on three phase 3 studies of more than 2,000 adults, the manufacturer announced July 13.
The approved indication is for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy, according to a press release issued by Janssen Biotech, which stated that this is the first IL-23 blocker approved for psoriasis.
Results of one of the phase 3 trials, VOYAGE 1, included a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with guselkumab achieving at least a 90% improvement in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI 90) at 16 weeks, compared with placebo (73.3% vs. 2.9%). At 16 weeks, 85.1% of those treated with guselkumab achieved an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 (cleared) or 1 (minimal disease), compared with 6.9% of those on placebo. Superior responses continued through 48 weeks.
In an active comparator arm of the study comparing guselkumab with the TNF blocker adalimumab (Humira), a significantly higher proportion of those treated with guselkumab achieved PASI 90 scores (76.3% vs. 47.9%) and IGA 0/1 scores (80.5% vs. 55.4%) at week 48. The results were published in March (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Mar;76[3]:405-17).
Results of VOYAGE 2 comparing guselkumab with adalimumab included a PASI 90 rate of 66.1% at week 48 among adalimumab nonresponders who switched to guselkumab (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Mar;76[3]:418-31).
The most common serious adverse effects associated with treatment included upper respiratory infections, headache, injection site reactions, arthralgias, diarrhea, gastroenteritis, fungal skin infections, and herpes simplex infections, according to the company statement.
Phase 3 studies of guselkumab for active psoriatic arthritis and in comparison with secukinumab (Cosentyx) in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis are underway, according to Janssen, which is marketing guselkumab as Tremfya.
, based on three phase 3 studies of more than 2,000 adults, the manufacturer announced July 13.
The approved indication is for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy, according to a press release issued by Janssen Biotech, which stated that this is the first IL-23 blocker approved for psoriasis.
Results of one of the phase 3 trials, VOYAGE 1, included a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with guselkumab achieving at least a 90% improvement in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI 90) at 16 weeks, compared with placebo (73.3% vs. 2.9%). At 16 weeks, 85.1% of those treated with guselkumab achieved an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 (cleared) or 1 (minimal disease), compared with 6.9% of those on placebo. Superior responses continued through 48 weeks.
In an active comparator arm of the study comparing guselkumab with the TNF blocker adalimumab (Humira), a significantly higher proportion of those treated with guselkumab achieved PASI 90 scores (76.3% vs. 47.9%) and IGA 0/1 scores (80.5% vs. 55.4%) at week 48. The results were published in March (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Mar;76[3]:405-17).
Results of VOYAGE 2 comparing guselkumab with adalimumab included a PASI 90 rate of 66.1% at week 48 among adalimumab nonresponders who switched to guselkumab (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Mar;76[3]:418-31).
The most common serious adverse effects associated with treatment included upper respiratory infections, headache, injection site reactions, arthralgias, diarrhea, gastroenteritis, fungal skin infections, and herpes simplex infections, according to the company statement.
Phase 3 studies of guselkumab for active psoriatic arthritis and in comparison with secukinumab (Cosentyx) in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis are underway, according to Janssen, which is marketing guselkumab as Tremfya.
, based on three phase 3 studies of more than 2,000 adults, the manufacturer announced July 13.
The approved indication is for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy, according to a press release issued by Janssen Biotech, which stated that this is the first IL-23 blocker approved for psoriasis.
Results of one of the phase 3 trials, VOYAGE 1, included a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with guselkumab achieving at least a 90% improvement in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI 90) at 16 weeks, compared with placebo (73.3% vs. 2.9%). At 16 weeks, 85.1% of those treated with guselkumab achieved an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 (cleared) or 1 (minimal disease), compared with 6.9% of those on placebo. Superior responses continued through 48 weeks.
In an active comparator arm of the study comparing guselkumab with the TNF blocker adalimumab (Humira), a significantly higher proportion of those treated with guselkumab achieved PASI 90 scores (76.3% vs. 47.9%) and IGA 0/1 scores (80.5% vs. 55.4%) at week 48. The results were published in March (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Mar;76[3]:405-17).
Results of VOYAGE 2 comparing guselkumab with adalimumab included a PASI 90 rate of 66.1% at week 48 among adalimumab nonresponders who switched to guselkumab (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Mar;76[3]:418-31).
The most common serious adverse effects associated with treatment included upper respiratory infections, headache, injection site reactions, arthralgias, diarrhea, gastroenteritis, fungal skin infections, and herpes simplex infections, according to the company statement.
Phase 3 studies of guselkumab for active psoriatic arthritis and in comparison with secukinumab (Cosentyx) in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis are underway, according to Janssen, which is marketing guselkumab as Tremfya.
Comorbidities in psoriatic arthritis flag worse prognosis
MADRID – Comorbidities are relatively common in psoriatic arthritis patients, and they are more prevalent in patients with a worse disease course while on initial treatment with a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, based on data from more than 1,700 Danish patients.
The presence of comorbidities in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients on initial tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment “was associated with higher disease activity, shorter adherence to the first TNFi, and reduced clinical response,” Lars Erik Kristensen, MD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology.
To better understand the possible impact of comorbidities on PsA, he and his associates reviewed 1,750 Danish patients with PsA enrolled in a national registry at the time they began treatment with a TNFi. At the time they started treatment, 1,066 (61%) had no comorbidities, 493 (28%) had one comorbidity, and 191 (11%) had two or more comorbidities.
A comparison of the subgroups with no comorbidities and those with two or more showed several important and statistically significant differences in their baseline characteristics. Patients with at least two comorbidities had longer disease duration, and they had more active disease as measured by parameters including the Disease Activity Score 28 and the Health Assessment Questionnaire. Patients with two or more comorbidities also were older and had a higher average body mass index.
Further analyses showed that patients with two or more comorbidities were 72% more like to discontinue their TNFi treatment, compared with patients with no comorbidities – a statistically significant difference, Dr. Kristensen reported.
After 6 months of TNFi treatment, patients with two or more comorbidities had lower rates of achieving the American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50%, or 70% improvement criteria compared with patients with no comorbidities. For example, an ACR20 response occurred in 40% of patients with no comorbidities and in 31% of patients with two or more comorbidities after 6 months in an adjusted analysis.
Dr. Kristensen has been a consultant to or a speaker for several drug companies.
[email protected]
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
MADRID – Comorbidities are relatively common in psoriatic arthritis patients, and they are more prevalent in patients with a worse disease course while on initial treatment with a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, based on data from more than 1,700 Danish patients.
The presence of comorbidities in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients on initial tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment “was associated with higher disease activity, shorter adherence to the first TNFi, and reduced clinical response,” Lars Erik Kristensen, MD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology.
To better understand the possible impact of comorbidities on PsA, he and his associates reviewed 1,750 Danish patients with PsA enrolled in a national registry at the time they began treatment with a TNFi. At the time they started treatment, 1,066 (61%) had no comorbidities, 493 (28%) had one comorbidity, and 191 (11%) had two or more comorbidities.
A comparison of the subgroups with no comorbidities and those with two or more showed several important and statistically significant differences in their baseline characteristics. Patients with at least two comorbidities had longer disease duration, and they had more active disease as measured by parameters including the Disease Activity Score 28 and the Health Assessment Questionnaire. Patients with two or more comorbidities also were older and had a higher average body mass index.
Further analyses showed that patients with two or more comorbidities were 72% more like to discontinue their TNFi treatment, compared with patients with no comorbidities – a statistically significant difference, Dr. Kristensen reported.
After 6 months of TNFi treatment, patients with two or more comorbidities had lower rates of achieving the American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50%, or 70% improvement criteria compared with patients with no comorbidities. For example, an ACR20 response occurred in 40% of patients with no comorbidities and in 31% of patients with two or more comorbidities after 6 months in an adjusted analysis.
Dr. Kristensen has been a consultant to or a speaker for several drug companies.
[email protected]
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
MADRID – Comorbidities are relatively common in psoriatic arthritis patients, and they are more prevalent in patients with a worse disease course while on initial treatment with a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, based on data from more than 1,700 Danish patients.
The presence of comorbidities in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients on initial tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment “was associated with higher disease activity, shorter adherence to the first TNFi, and reduced clinical response,” Lars Erik Kristensen, MD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology.
To better understand the possible impact of comorbidities on PsA, he and his associates reviewed 1,750 Danish patients with PsA enrolled in a national registry at the time they began treatment with a TNFi. At the time they started treatment, 1,066 (61%) had no comorbidities, 493 (28%) had one comorbidity, and 191 (11%) had two or more comorbidities.
A comparison of the subgroups with no comorbidities and those with two or more showed several important and statistically significant differences in their baseline characteristics. Patients with at least two comorbidities had longer disease duration, and they had more active disease as measured by parameters including the Disease Activity Score 28 and the Health Assessment Questionnaire. Patients with two or more comorbidities also were older and had a higher average body mass index.
Further analyses showed that patients with two or more comorbidities were 72% more like to discontinue their TNFi treatment, compared with patients with no comorbidities – a statistically significant difference, Dr. Kristensen reported.
After 6 months of TNFi treatment, patients with two or more comorbidities had lower rates of achieving the American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50%, or 70% improvement criteria compared with patients with no comorbidities. For example, an ACR20 response occurred in 40% of patients with no comorbidities and in 31% of patients with two or more comorbidities after 6 months in an adjusted analysis.
Dr. Kristensen has been a consultant to or a speaker for several drug companies.
[email protected]
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
AT THE EULAR 2017 CONGRESS
Key clinical point: , compared with patients with no comorbidities.
Major finding: An ACR20 response occurred in 40% of patients with no comorbidities but only 31% of those with two or more comorbidities.
Data source: Review of national registry data for 1,750 Danish psoriatic arthritis patients.
Disclosures: Dr. Kristensen has been a consultant to or a speaker for several drug companies.
FDA approves abatacept for adults with psoriatic arthritis
The Food and Drug Administration has approved abatacept, a selective T-cell costimulation modulator, for treating adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), the manufacturer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, has announced.
Approval of abatacept (Orencia) was based on two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (PsA-I and PsA-II) in 594 adults with PsA for more than 7 years, according to the July 6 announcement. Patients had active PsA (at least three swollen joints and at least three tender joints), despite previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy and had one qualifying psoriatic skin lesion measuring at least 2 cm in diameter. The studies included patients treated with TNF inhibitors (TNFi) previously.
In the PsA-II trial, 424 patients received weekly doses of placebo or abatacept 25 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) without a loading dose for 24 weeks, followed by open-label abatacept at a dose of 125 mg SC weekly.
Compared with those on placebo, more patients treated with abatacept 10 mg/kg IV or 125 mg SC achieved an ACR 20 (American College of Rheumatology 20) response at 24 weeks: 47.5% vs. 19.0% and 39.4% vs. 22.3%, respectively (P less than .05).
Other results included a greater proportion of abatacept SC patients with at least a 0.35 decrease from baseline on the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index: 31% vs. 24% on placebo at 24 weeks. Responses were seen regardless of prior anti-TNFi treatment and regardless of concomitant non-biologic DMARD treatment. In addition, patients on abatacept IV and SC had improvements in enthesitis and dactylitis at 24 weeks.
The safety profile of abatacept in the two studies was “consistent with the safety profile” in rheumatoid arthritis, according to the company release.
Abatacept, initially approved in 2005, was previously approved for RA in adults and for juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Find the updated prescribing information for abatacept here.
The Food and Drug Administration has approved abatacept, a selective T-cell costimulation modulator, for treating adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), the manufacturer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, has announced.
Approval of abatacept (Orencia) was based on two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (PsA-I and PsA-II) in 594 adults with PsA for more than 7 years, according to the July 6 announcement. Patients had active PsA (at least three swollen joints and at least three tender joints), despite previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy and had one qualifying psoriatic skin lesion measuring at least 2 cm in diameter. The studies included patients treated with TNF inhibitors (TNFi) previously.
In the PsA-II trial, 424 patients received weekly doses of placebo or abatacept 25 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) without a loading dose for 24 weeks, followed by open-label abatacept at a dose of 125 mg SC weekly.
Compared with those on placebo, more patients treated with abatacept 10 mg/kg IV or 125 mg SC achieved an ACR 20 (American College of Rheumatology 20) response at 24 weeks: 47.5% vs. 19.0% and 39.4% vs. 22.3%, respectively (P less than .05).
Other results included a greater proportion of abatacept SC patients with at least a 0.35 decrease from baseline on the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index: 31% vs. 24% on placebo at 24 weeks. Responses were seen regardless of prior anti-TNFi treatment and regardless of concomitant non-biologic DMARD treatment. In addition, patients on abatacept IV and SC had improvements in enthesitis and dactylitis at 24 weeks.
The safety profile of abatacept in the two studies was “consistent with the safety profile” in rheumatoid arthritis, according to the company release.
Abatacept, initially approved in 2005, was previously approved for RA in adults and for juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Find the updated prescribing information for abatacept here.
The Food and Drug Administration has approved abatacept, a selective T-cell costimulation modulator, for treating adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), the manufacturer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, has announced.
Approval of abatacept (Orencia) was based on two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (PsA-I and PsA-II) in 594 adults with PsA for more than 7 years, according to the July 6 announcement. Patients had active PsA (at least three swollen joints and at least three tender joints), despite previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy and had one qualifying psoriatic skin lesion measuring at least 2 cm in diameter. The studies included patients treated with TNF inhibitors (TNFi) previously.
In the PsA-II trial, 424 patients received weekly doses of placebo or abatacept 25 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) without a loading dose for 24 weeks, followed by open-label abatacept at a dose of 125 mg SC weekly.
Compared with those on placebo, more patients treated with abatacept 10 mg/kg IV or 125 mg SC achieved an ACR 20 (American College of Rheumatology 20) response at 24 weeks: 47.5% vs. 19.0% and 39.4% vs. 22.3%, respectively (P less than .05).
Other results included a greater proportion of abatacept SC patients with at least a 0.35 decrease from baseline on the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index: 31% vs. 24% on placebo at 24 weeks. Responses were seen regardless of prior anti-TNFi treatment and regardless of concomitant non-biologic DMARD treatment. In addition, patients on abatacept IV and SC had improvements in enthesitis and dactylitis at 24 weeks.
The safety profile of abatacept in the two studies was “consistent with the safety profile” in rheumatoid arthritis, according to the company release.
Abatacept, initially approved in 2005, was previously approved for RA in adults and for juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Find the updated prescribing information for abatacept here.