ACS Surgery News

BOSTON – A study of over 60 years of patient data from the Mayo Clinic suggests a reconsideration of the routine use of unilateral thyroid lobectomy (UL) as the initial treatment for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

“Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma [PTM] patients have a normal life expectancy and typically are cured by adequate tumor resection. More than 99% of PTM patients are not at risk of either distant spread or mortality from cancer,” said Dr. Ian D. Hay of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Unilateral thyroid lobectomy is one treatment option for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma along with conventional bilateral nodal resection approaches of near-total thyroidectomy (NT) or total thyroidectomy (TT), or selective radioactive iodine remnant ablation (RRA).

Awareness of PTM is not new; examination of thyroid glands at autopsy going back decades has revealed their presence in 6%-36% of samples. A more recent development is the use of high-resolution ultrasound-guided biopsies of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) lesions as small as 3 cm. For example, at the Mayo Clinic the diagnosis of PTM was about one annually from 1935 to 1944, while from 2005 to 2014 the average was close to one per day. “At Mayo, 34% of PTCs seen since 1995 are PTMs,” Dr. Hay said at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.

The best initial management of PTMs is disputed, with observation favored by some, TT and RRA favored by others, and ethanol ablation having been found to be effective by institutions including the Mayo Clinic. UL has been deemphasized, despite the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines recommendation of UL as the usual surgical procedure for adults with PTM.

Dr. Hay and his colleagues sought to provide some clarity to the issue by taking advantage of the institute’s database of adult (18+ years) PTM patients who were consecutively treated from 1935 to 2014. The decades of data allowed a long-term look at patient outcomes. They examined data from 1,345 patients, 954 women and 391 men with a median age at surgery of 48 years. The mean follow-up was 15.4 years, representing almost 21,000 patient years. Data on tumor recurrence and cause-specific mortality were derived from a data base of over 4,300 PTC patients representing over 66,000 patient-years of observation.

Median tumor size was 7 mm (range, 0.08-1.0 cm). Extrathyroid invasion was evident in 18 (1.3%) cases and 298 tumors (26%) were multifocal. There were 399 (30%) node-positive tumors at diagnosis and 4 (0.3%) cases featuring initial distant metastases.

The mean MACIS (metastasis, age at presentation, completeness of surgical resection, invasion [extrathyroidal], size) score was 4.25 with little variation in score over time. Almost all (96%) patients had a MACIS score of under 6. Bilateral lobar resection was done in 1,132 (95%) patients, with NT or TT comprising 80% of the cases. UL was done in only 202 (15%) cases. The use of TT skyrocketed from 3% of the cases done in the first 2 decades to 40% in the last 2 decades. Regional nodes were removed at surgery in 743 (55%) cases, either by “node picking” (23%) or compartmental dissection (32%).

Overall survival following surgery in PTM patients was similar to age- and gender-matched controls (397 deaths observed, 431 deaths expected; P = .16). Only four (0.3%) patients died of PTM. The rates of locoregional recurrence were similar for the unilateral and bilateral approaches (P = .90). In 1,148 patients with potentially curable PTM, defined as the absence of metastasis at diagnosis and no gross residual disease, the rates of tumor recurrence 10, 20, and 40 years after surgery were 6%, 7%, and 10%, respectively. In these 1,148 patients, the 30-year locoregional recurrence rates after UL alone were similar to those seen after NT or TT followed by RRA (P = .99).

UL did not result in permanent unilateral vocal cord paresis or permanent hypoparathyroidism. These adversities were more likely to develop following bilateral lobectomy.

“Since [UL] produces comparable recurrence results when compared to bilateral surgery and is not associated with either cord paresis or hypoparathyroidism, then perhaps it is overdue for institutions like Mayo to individualize our treatment policies and more often employ UL when surgery, and not observation or ultrasound-guided percutaneous ethanol ablation, is chosen to treat PTM,” said Dr. Hay.

Dr. Hay was adamant on the overuse of ultrasound in the detection of small-diameter carcinomas in the decision for bilateral surgery. “It’s embarrassing how much we are wasting resources and doing too much ultrasound too often,” he said in an interview.

Dr. Hay had no disclosures.

BOSTON – A study of over 60 years of patient data from the Mayo Clinic suggests a reconsideration of the routine use of unilateral thyroid lobectomy (UL) as the initial treatment for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

“Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma [PTM] patients have a normal life expectancy and typically are cured by adequate tumor resection. More than 99% of PTM patients are not at risk of either distant spread or mortality from cancer,” said Dr. Ian D. Hay of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Unilateral thyroid lobectomy is one treatment option for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma along with conventional bilateral nodal resection approaches of near-total thyroidectomy (NT) or total thyroidectomy (TT), or selective radioactive iodine remnant ablation (RRA).

Awareness of PTM is not new; examination of thyroid glands at autopsy going back decades has revealed their presence in 6%-36% of samples. A more recent development is the use of high-resolution ultrasound-guided biopsies of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) lesions as small as 3 cm. For example, at the Mayo Clinic the diagnosis of PTM was about one annually from 1935 to 1944, while from 2005 to 2014 the average was close to one per day. “At Mayo, 34% of PTCs seen since 1995 are PTMs,” Dr. Hay said at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.

The best initial management of PTMs is disputed, with observation favored by some, TT and RRA favored by others, and ethanol ablation having been found to be effective by institutions including the Mayo Clinic. UL has been deemphasized, despite the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines recommendation of UL as the usual surgical procedure for adults with PTM.

Dr. Hay and his colleagues sought to provide some clarity to the issue by taking advantage of the institute’s database of adult (18+ years) PTM patients who were consecutively treated from 1935 to 2014. The decades of data allowed a long-term look at patient outcomes. They examined data from 1,345 patients, 954 women and 391 men with a median age at surgery of 48 years. The mean follow-up was 15.4 years, representing almost 21,000 patient years. Data on tumor recurrence and cause-specific mortality were derived from a data base of over 4,300 PTC patients representing over 66,000 patient-years of observation.

Median tumor size was 7 mm (range, 0.08-1.0 cm). Extrathyroid invasion was evident in 18 (1.3%) cases and 298 tumors (26%) were multifocal. There were 399 (30%) node-positive tumors at diagnosis and 4 (0.3%) cases featuring initial distant metastases.

The mean MACIS (metastasis, age at presentation, completeness of surgical resection, invasion [extrathyroidal], size) score was 4.25 with little variation in score over time. Almost all (96%) patients had a MACIS score of under 6. Bilateral lobar resection was done in 1,132 (95%) patients, with NT or TT comprising 80% of the cases. UL was done in only 202 (15%) cases. The use of TT skyrocketed from 3% of the cases done in the first 2 decades to 40% in the last 2 decades. Regional nodes were removed at surgery in 743 (55%) cases, either by “node picking” (23%) or compartmental dissection (32%).

Overall survival following surgery in PTM patients was similar to age- and gender-matched controls (397 deaths observed, 431 deaths expected; P = .16). Only four (0.3%) patients died of PTM. The rates of locoregional recurrence were similar for the unilateral and bilateral approaches (P = .90). In 1,148 patients with potentially curable PTM, defined as the absence of metastasis at diagnosis and no gross residual disease, the rates of tumor recurrence 10, 20, and 40 years after surgery were 6%, 7%, and 10%, respectively. In these 1,148 patients, the 30-year locoregional recurrence rates after UL alone were similar to those seen after NT or TT followed by RRA (P = .99).

UL did not result in permanent unilateral vocal cord paresis or permanent hypoparathyroidism. These adversities were more likely to develop following bilateral lobectomy.

“Since [UL] produces comparable recurrence results when compared to bilateral surgery and is not associated with either cord paresis or hypoparathyroidism, then perhaps it is overdue for institutions like Mayo to individualize our treatment policies and more often employ UL when surgery, and not observation or ultrasound-guided percutaneous ethanol ablation, is chosen to treat PTM,” said Dr. Hay.

Dr. Hay was adamant on the overuse of ultrasound in the detection of small-diameter carcinomas in the decision for bilateral surgery. “It’s embarrassing how much we are wasting resources and doing too much ultrasound too often,” he said in an interview.

Dr. Hay had no disclosures.

BOSTON – A study of over 60 years of patient data from the Mayo Clinic suggests a reconsideration of the routine use of unilateral thyroid lobectomy (UL) as the initial treatment for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

“Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma [PTM] patients have a normal life expectancy and typically are cured by adequate tumor resection. More than 99% of PTM patients are not at risk of either distant spread or mortality from cancer,” said Dr. Ian D. Hay of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Unilateral thyroid lobectomy is one treatment option for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma along with conventional bilateral nodal resection approaches of near-total thyroidectomy (NT) or total thyroidectomy (TT), or selective radioactive iodine remnant ablation (RRA).

Awareness of PTM is not new; examination of thyroid glands at autopsy going back decades has revealed their presence in 6%-36% of samples. A more recent development is the use of high-resolution ultrasound-guided biopsies of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) lesions as small as 3 cm. For example, at the Mayo Clinic the diagnosis of PTM was about one annually from 1935 to 1944, while from 2005 to 2014 the average was close to one per day. “At Mayo, 34% of PTCs seen since 1995 are PTMs,” Dr. Hay said at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.

The best initial management of PTMs is disputed, with observation favored by some, TT and RRA favored by others, and ethanol ablation having been found to be effective by institutions including the Mayo Clinic. UL has been deemphasized, despite the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines recommendation of UL as the usual surgical procedure for adults with PTM.

Dr. Hay and his colleagues sought to provide some clarity to the issue by taking advantage of the institute’s database of adult (18+ years) PTM patients who were consecutively treated from 1935 to 2014. The decades of data allowed a long-term look at patient outcomes. They examined data from 1,345 patients, 954 women and 391 men with a median age at surgery of 48 years. The mean follow-up was 15.4 years, representing almost 21,000 patient years. Data on tumor recurrence and cause-specific mortality were derived from a data base of over 4,300 PTC patients representing over 66,000 patient-years of observation.

Median tumor size was 7 mm (range, 0.08-1.0 cm). Extrathyroid invasion was evident in 18 (1.3%) cases and 298 tumors (26%) were multifocal. There were 399 (30%) node-positive tumors at diagnosis and 4 (0.3%) cases featuring initial distant metastases.

The mean MACIS (metastasis, age at presentation, completeness of surgical resection, invasion [extrathyroidal], size) score was 4.25 with little variation in score over time. Almost all (96%) patients had a MACIS score of under 6. Bilateral lobar resection was done in 1,132 (95%) patients, with NT or TT comprising 80% of the cases. UL was done in only 202 (15%) cases. The use of TT skyrocketed from 3% of the cases done in the first 2 decades to 40% in the last 2 decades. Regional nodes were removed at surgery in 743 (55%) cases, either by “node picking” (23%) or compartmental dissection (32%).

Overall survival following surgery in PTM patients was similar to age- and gender-matched controls (397 deaths observed, 431 deaths expected; P = .16). Only four (0.3%) patients died of PTM. The rates of locoregional recurrence were similar for the unilateral and bilateral approaches (P = .90). In 1,148 patients with potentially curable PTM, defined as the absence of metastasis at diagnosis and no gross residual disease, the rates of tumor recurrence 10, 20, and 40 years after surgery were 6%, 7%, and 10%, respectively. In these 1,148 patients, the 30-year locoregional recurrence rates after UL alone were similar to those seen after NT or TT followed by RRA (P = .99).

UL did not result in permanent unilateral vocal cord paresis or permanent hypoparathyroidism. These adversities were more likely to develop following bilateral lobectomy.

“Since [UL] produces comparable recurrence results when compared to bilateral surgery and is not associated with either cord paresis or hypoparathyroidism, then perhaps it is overdue for institutions like Mayo to individualize our treatment policies and more often employ UL when surgery, and not observation or ultrasound-guided percutaneous ethanol ablation, is chosen to treat PTM,” said Dr. Hay.

Dr. Hay was adamant on the overuse of ultrasound in the detection of small-diameter carcinomas in the decision for bilateral surgery. “It’s embarrassing how much we are wasting resources and doing too much ultrasound too often,” he said in an interview.

Dr. Hay had no disclosures.

HOLLYWOOD, FLA. – The National Comprehensive Cancer Network has issued new guidelines for the diagnosis and management of vulvar cancer.

Vulvar cancers are rare neoplasms, with an estimated U.S. annual incidence of 5,950 cases, and 1,110 deaths. The majority of cases (about 90%) are of squamous cell histology.

Treatment of vulvar cancer has evolved from en bloc resections used throughout most of the 20th century, to more refined techniques, said Dr. Benjamin E. Greer, professor of gynecological oncology at the University of Washington in Seattle.

“In the 1980s, we started to modify treatment to reduce morbidity,” he said at the annual conference of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

With older, more radical techniques, groin breakdown, leg edema, and impaired sexual function were common post-surgery consequences. Current practice, however, is to perform regional lymph node management for unilateral cancers, radical local excision rather than en bloc resections, separate groin incisions, lymphatic mapping, radiation, chemotherapy, and, if necessary, exenteration, Dr. Greer noted.

The guidelines note that adequate surgical margins – 1 to 2 cm – at the time of primary surgery appear to be essential for reducing risk of local recurrence, and that if margins are within 8 mm of tumor, the surgeon should consider re-excision or adjuvant radiation.

Lymph node status is the most important determinant of survival, with historical reports showing overall survival following surgery of 70% to 80% among patients with negative nodes, compared with 30% to 40% of those with positive nodes, he said.

Evaluation of bilateral inguinofemoral groin nodes should be performed in patients with lesions in the vulvar midline, and ipsilateral groin node evaluation should be performed for those with lateral lesions lying more than 2 cm from the vulvar midline. Additionally, select patients may require sentinel lymph node biopsy, the guidelines state.

Unilateral carcinomas of the vulva can be treated with limited radical vulvectomy and ipsilateral inguinal femoral node dissection. Lymph node dissection can be performed through a separate incision. For patients with positive nodes, adjuvant radiation may aid in disease control. Patients with inoperable carcinomas are recommended to receive radiation and chemotherapy.

Radiation for vulvar cancer

“For early stage tumors, adjuvant radiotherapy is an effective treatment modality that significantly decreases recurrence, especially in surgically resected groins, and it leads to improvement in relapse-free and overall survival,” said Dr. Wui-Jin Koh, medical director for radiation oncology at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.

Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation may provide additional therapeutic benefit, especially for patients with advanced, unresectable tumors, and it may help to address systemic risk in patients with multiple positive lymph nodes, Dr. Koh said.

The guidelines state that radiation can be given with external beam radiation delivered via a 3D-conformal or intensity modulated (IMRT) technique, with brachytherapy boost for some tumors where the anatomy permits.

“Careful attention should be taken to ensure adequate tumor coverage by combining clinical examination, imaging findings, and appropriate nodal volumes at risk to define the target volume,” the guideline states.

For adjuvant therapy, doses of 50.4 Gy divided in 1.8 Gy fractions should be delivered once daily 5 days per week, with minimal treatment breaks.

For treatment of unresectable tumors, doses range from 59.4 Gy to 64.8 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions, with a boost dose to approximately 70 Gy for large lymph nodes in select cases.

Residual disease

The decision to provide additional treatment following surgery is based on whether the patient is clinically negative for residual tumor at the primary site and nodes.

“If one has negative margins and negative nodes? Observation, absolutely,” Dr. Koh said. “If one has positive margins for invasive disease, our recommendation is to re-excise and not go straight to radiation, and if one can do it and get negative margins, again observe the majority of them.”

“Use radiation very judiciously,” he added. “Only if patients have positive margins or have unresectable primary disease do we routinely recommend radiation.”

Locally advanced disease

For patients who cannot be treated with conventional or sphincter-sparing, organ preserving surgery upfront, the recommendation is to provide chemoradiation, with initial radiation to the primary site, groins, and pelvis, and concurrent week cisplatin at a dose of 30-40 mg/m² per week. The recommended radiation doses are 45 Gy to at-risk, microscopic clinical tumor volume, and 57.6 to 60 Gy to gross tumor volume (primary site and nodes).

“If one uses IMRT, you need to be very generous with the volumes,” Dr. Koh said.

The panelists also recommend re-imaging and re-evaluating patients 6 to 8 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation, with possible resection or biopsy of the primary tumor site, and limited groin resection of imaged residual disease.

For patients with clearly node-positive disease, “my general preference is to give upfront chemoradiation therapy to avoid delay of primary therapy, and then resect residual nodes after the chemoradiation is done,” he said.

HOLLYWOOD, FLA. – The National Comprehensive Cancer Network has issued new guidelines for the diagnosis and management of vulvar cancer.

Vulvar cancers are rare neoplasms, with an estimated U.S. annual incidence of 5,950 cases, and 1,110 deaths. The majority of cases (about 90%) are of squamous cell histology.

Treatment of vulvar cancer has evolved from en bloc resections used throughout most of the 20th century, to more refined techniques, said Dr. Benjamin E. Greer, professor of gynecological oncology at the University of Washington in Seattle.

“In the 1980s, we started to modify treatment to reduce morbidity,” he said at the annual conference of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

With older, more radical techniques, groin breakdown, leg edema, and impaired sexual function were common post-surgery consequences. Current practice, however, is to perform regional lymph node management for unilateral cancers, radical local excision rather than en bloc resections, separate groin incisions, lymphatic mapping, radiation, chemotherapy, and, if necessary, exenteration, Dr. Greer noted.

The guidelines note that adequate surgical margins – 1 to 2 cm – at the time of primary surgery appear to be essential for reducing risk of local recurrence, and that if margins are within 8 mm of tumor, the surgeon should consider re-excision or adjuvant radiation.

Lymph node status is the most important determinant of survival, with historical reports showing overall survival following surgery of 70% to 80% among patients with negative nodes, compared with 30% to 40% of those with positive nodes, he said.

Evaluation of bilateral inguinofemoral groin nodes should be performed in patients with lesions in the vulvar midline, and ipsilateral groin node evaluation should be performed for those with lateral lesions lying more than 2 cm from the vulvar midline. Additionally, select patients may require sentinel lymph node biopsy, the guidelines state.

Unilateral carcinomas of the vulva can be treated with limited radical vulvectomy and ipsilateral inguinal femoral node dissection. Lymph node dissection can be performed through a separate incision. For patients with positive nodes, adjuvant radiation may aid in disease control. Patients with inoperable carcinomas are recommended to receive radiation and chemotherapy.

Radiation for vulvar cancer

“For early stage tumors, adjuvant radiotherapy is an effective treatment modality that significantly decreases recurrence, especially in surgically resected groins, and it leads to improvement in relapse-free and overall survival,” said Dr. Wui-Jin Koh, medical director for radiation oncology at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.

Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation may provide additional therapeutic benefit, especially for patients with advanced, unresectable tumors, and it may help to address systemic risk in patients with multiple positive lymph nodes, Dr. Koh said.

The guidelines state that radiation can be given with external beam radiation delivered via a 3D-conformal or intensity modulated (IMRT) technique, with brachytherapy boost for some tumors where the anatomy permits.

“Careful attention should be taken to ensure adequate tumor coverage by combining clinical examination, imaging findings, and appropriate nodal volumes at risk to define the target volume,” the guideline states.

For adjuvant therapy, doses of 50.4 Gy divided in 1.8 Gy fractions should be delivered once daily 5 days per week, with minimal treatment breaks.

For treatment of unresectable tumors, doses range from 59.4 Gy to 64.8 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions, with a boost dose to approximately 70 Gy for large lymph nodes in select cases.

Residual disease

The decision to provide additional treatment following surgery is based on whether the patient is clinically negative for residual tumor at the primary site and nodes.

“If one has negative margins and negative nodes? Observation, absolutely,” Dr. Koh said. “If one has positive margins for invasive disease, our recommendation is to re-excise and not go straight to radiation, and if one can do it and get negative margins, again observe the majority of them.”

“Use radiation very judiciously,” he added. “Only if patients have positive margins or have unresectable primary disease do we routinely recommend radiation.”

Locally advanced disease

For patients who cannot be treated with conventional or sphincter-sparing, organ preserving surgery upfront, the recommendation is to provide chemoradiation, with initial radiation to the primary site, groins, and pelvis, and concurrent week cisplatin at a dose of 30-40 mg/m² per week. The recommended radiation doses are 45 Gy to at-risk, microscopic clinical tumor volume, and 57.6 to 60 Gy to gross tumor volume (primary site and nodes).

“If one uses IMRT, you need to be very generous with the volumes,” Dr. Koh said.

The panelists also recommend re-imaging and re-evaluating patients 6 to 8 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation, with possible resection or biopsy of the primary tumor site, and limited groin resection of imaged residual disease.

For patients with clearly node-positive disease, “my general preference is to give upfront chemoradiation therapy to avoid delay of primary therapy, and then resect residual nodes after the chemoradiation is done,” he said.

HOLLYWOOD, FLA. – The National Comprehensive Cancer Network has issued new guidelines for the diagnosis and management of vulvar cancer.

Vulvar cancers are rare neoplasms, with an estimated U.S. annual incidence of 5,950 cases, and 1,110 deaths. The majority of cases (about 90%) are of squamous cell histology.

Treatment of vulvar cancer has evolved from en bloc resections used throughout most of the 20th century, to more refined techniques, said Dr. Benjamin E. Greer, professor of gynecological oncology at the University of Washington in Seattle.

“In the 1980s, we started to modify treatment to reduce morbidity,” he said at the annual conference of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

With older, more radical techniques, groin breakdown, leg edema, and impaired sexual function were common post-surgery consequences. Current practice, however, is to perform regional lymph node management for unilateral cancers, radical local excision rather than en bloc resections, separate groin incisions, lymphatic mapping, radiation, chemotherapy, and, if necessary, exenteration, Dr. Greer noted.

The guidelines note that adequate surgical margins – 1 to 2 cm – at the time of primary surgery appear to be essential for reducing risk of local recurrence, and that if margins are within 8 mm of tumor, the surgeon should consider re-excision or adjuvant radiation.

Lymph node status is the most important determinant of survival, with historical reports showing overall survival following surgery of 70% to 80% among patients with negative nodes, compared with 30% to 40% of those with positive nodes, he said.

Evaluation of bilateral inguinofemoral groin nodes should be performed in patients with lesions in the vulvar midline, and ipsilateral groin node evaluation should be performed for those with lateral lesions lying more than 2 cm from the vulvar midline. Additionally, select patients may require sentinel lymph node biopsy, the guidelines state.

Unilateral carcinomas of the vulva can be treated with limited radical vulvectomy and ipsilateral inguinal femoral node dissection. Lymph node dissection can be performed through a separate incision. For patients with positive nodes, adjuvant radiation may aid in disease control. Patients with inoperable carcinomas are recommended to receive radiation and chemotherapy.

Radiation for vulvar cancer

“For early stage tumors, adjuvant radiotherapy is an effective treatment modality that significantly decreases recurrence, especially in surgically resected groins, and it leads to improvement in relapse-free and overall survival,” said Dr. Wui-Jin Koh, medical director for radiation oncology at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.

Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation may provide additional therapeutic benefit, especially for patients with advanced, unresectable tumors, and it may help to address systemic risk in patients with multiple positive lymph nodes, Dr. Koh said.

The guidelines state that radiation can be given with external beam radiation delivered via a 3D-conformal or intensity modulated (IMRT) technique, with brachytherapy boost for some tumors where the anatomy permits.

“Careful attention should be taken to ensure adequate tumor coverage by combining clinical examination, imaging findings, and appropriate nodal volumes at risk to define the target volume,” the guideline states.

For adjuvant therapy, doses of 50.4 Gy divided in 1.8 Gy fractions should be delivered once daily 5 days per week, with minimal treatment breaks.

For treatment of unresectable tumors, doses range from 59.4 Gy to 64.8 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions, with a boost dose to approximately 70 Gy for large lymph nodes in select cases.

Residual disease

The decision to provide additional treatment following surgery is based on whether the patient is clinically negative for residual tumor at the primary site and nodes.

“If one has negative margins and negative nodes? Observation, absolutely,” Dr. Koh said. “If one has positive margins for invasive disease, our recommendation is to re-excise and not go straight to radiation, and if one can do it and get negative margins, again observe the majority of them.”

“Use radiation very judiciously,” he added. “Only if patients have positive margins or have unresectable primary disease do we routinely recommend radiation.”

Locally advanced disease

For patients who cannot be treated with conventional or sphincter-sparing, organ preserving surgery upfront, the recommendation is to provide chemoradiation, with initial radiation to the primary site, groins, and pelvis, and concurrent week cisplatin at a dose of 30-40 mg/m² per week. The recommended radiation doses are 45 Gy to at-risk, microscopic clinical tumor volume, and 57.6 to 60 Gy to gross tumor volume (primary site and nodes).

“If one uses IMRT, you need to be very generous with the volumes,” Dr. Koh said.

The panelists also recommend re-imaging and re-evaluating patients 6 to 8 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation, with possible resection or biopsy of the primary tumor site, and limited groin resection of imaged residual disease.

For patients with clearly node-positive disease, “my general preference is to give upfront chemoradiation therapy to avoid delay of primary therapy, and then resect residual nodes after the chemoradiation is done,” he said.

AMSTERDAM – Patients with milder knee osteoarthritis symptoms or better quality of life before undergoing total knee replacement surgery gained less benefit from the surgery than did those who had more severe symptoms in two separate analyses of British and U.S. patients.

Additional evidence from total knee replacements (TKRs) performed on U.S. participants of the Osteoarthritis Initiative also suggest that as the use of TKR has increased to include less symptomatic patients, the overall cost-effectiveness of the procedure has declined.

©pixologicstudio/ thinkstockphotos.com

“Knee replacements are one of those interventions that are known to be very effective and very cost-effective,” Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva, Ph.D., of the University of Oxford (England) said during his presentation of National Health Service data from England at the World Congress on Osteoarthritis. Indeed, knee replacements are associated with significant improvements in pain, function, and quality of life, he said, but that is if you look at the mean values.

As the deciles for baseline knee pain and function decrease in severity, there are diminishing mean improvements and an increasing proportion of patients who do worse after the operation, he reported. Up to 17% of patients had unchanged or improved knee pain scores and up to 27% had lower quality of life scores. If minimally important differences were considered, these percentages rose to 40% and 48% of patients being worse off, respectively.

“The significant improvements seem to be overshadowing what happens to those patients who are doing worse,” Dr. Pinedo-Villanueva suggested. “So essentially cost-effectiveness is being driven by the magnitude of the change in those who do improve, and we don’t really see much about what is happening to those who are doing worse.”

Of over 215,000 records of knee replacement collected from all patients undergoing TKR in England during 2008-2012, Dr. Pinedo-Villanueva and his study coauthors found 117,844 had data on pre- and post-operative knee pain assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and quality of life measured with the EQ-5D instrument. The majority of replacements were in women (55%) and almost three quarters of patients had one or no comorbidities. Overall, the mean change in OKS was 15 points, improving from 19 to 34 (the higher the score the lesser the knee pain). EQ-5D scores also improved by a mean difference of 0.30 (from 0.41 to 0.70 where 1.0 is perfect health). Although the vast majority of patients had improved OKS and EQ-5D scores after surgery, unchanged or decreased scores were seen in 8% and 22% of patients, respectively.

“As we breakdown these data by deciles of baseline pain and function we see clearly that those starting at the lower decile improved the most, and that’s to be expected; they’ve a lot more to improve than the ones that came into the operation at the higher decile,” Dr. Pinedo-Villanueva said at the Congress, sponsored by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. But there were patients who fared worse at every decile, he noted.

Dr. Pinedo-Villanueva concluded that outcome prediction models were needed to try to reduce the number of patients who are apparently worse off after knee replacement and improve the efficiency of resource allocation.

The value of TKR in a contemporary U.S. population was the focus of a separate presentation by Dr. Bart Ferket of Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. Dr. Ferket reported the results of a study looking at the impact of TKR on patients’ quality of life, lifetime costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) while varying the use of TKR by patients’ functional status at baseline.

“In the United States, the rate at which total knee replacement is performed has doubled in the last two decades,” Dr. Ferket observed. This “disproportionate” increase has been attributed to expanding the eligibility criteria to include less symptomatic patients.

Using data collected over an 8-year period on 1,327 participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, Dr. Ferket and his associates at Mount Sinai and Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam (The Netherlands) discovered that the increased uptake of TKR might have affected the likely benefit and reduced the overall cost-effectiveness of the procedure.

At baseline, 17% of the participants, who all had knee osteoarthritis, had had a prior knee replacement.

Quality of life measured on the physical component scores (PCS) of the 12-item Short Form (SF-12) were generally improved after TKR but decreased in those who did not have a knee replaced. The effect on the mental component of the SF-12 was less clear, with possibly a decrease seen in some patients. Changes on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) showed a considerable benefit for knee replacement and there was a general decrease in pain medication over time in those who had surgery. The overall effect was more pronounced if patients with greater baseline symptoms were considered.

Cost-effectiveness modeling showed that reserving TKR for more seriously affected patients may make it more economically attractive. The QALYs gained from TKR was about 11 but as the number of QALYs increased, so did the relative lifetime cost, with increasing incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) as SF-12 PCS rose. ICERs were around $143,000, $160,000, $217,000, $385,000, and $1,175,000 considering patients with SF-12 PCS of less than 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50, respectively.

“The more lenient the eligibility criteria are, the higher the effectiveness, but also the higher the costs,” Dr. Ferket said. “The most cost-effective scenarios are actually more restrictive that what is currently seen in current practice in the U.S.”

Dr. Pinedo-Villanueva and Dr. Ferket reported having no financial disclosures.

AMSTERDAM – Patients with milder knee osteoarthritis symptoms or better quality of life before undergoing total knee replacement surgery gained less benefit from the surgery than did those who had more severe symptoms in two separate analyses of British and U.S. patients.

Additional evidence from total knee replacements (TKRs) performed on U.S. participants of the Osteoarthritis Initiative also suggest that as the use of TKR has increased to include less symptomatic patients, the overall cost-effectiveness of the procedure has declined.

©pixologicstudio/ thinkstockphotos.com

“Knee replacements are one of those interventions that are known to be very effective and very cost-effective,” Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva, Ph.D., of the University of Oxford (England) said during his presentation of National Health Service data from England at the World Congress on Osteoarthritis. Indeed, knee replacements are associated with significant improvements in pain, function, and quality of life, he said, but that is if you look at the mean values.

As the deciles for baseline knee pain and function decrease in severity, there are diminishing mean improvements and an increasing proportion of patients who do worse after the operation, he reported. Up to 17% of patients had unchanged or improved knee pain scores and up to 27% had lower quality of life scores. If minimally important differences were considered, these percentages rose to 40% and 48% of patients being worse off, respectively.

“The significant improvements seem to be overshadowing what happens to those patients who are doing worse,” Dr. Pinedo-Villanueva suggested. “So essentially cost-effectiveness is being driven by the magnitude of the change in those who do improve, and we don’t really see much about what is happening to those who are doing worse.”

Of over 215,000 records of knee replacement collected from all patients undergoing TKR in England during 2008-2012, Dr. Pinedo-Villanueva and his study coauthors found 117,844 had data on pre- and post-operative knee pain assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and quality of life measured with the EQ-5D instrument. The majority of replacements were in women (55%) and almost three quarters of patients had one or no comorbidities. Overall, the mean change in OKS was 15 points, improving from 19 to 34 (the higher the score the lesser the knee pain). EQ-5D scores also improved by a mean difference of 0.30 (from 0.41 to 0.70 where 1.0 is perfect health). Although the vast majority of patients had improved OKS and EQ-5D scores after surgery, unchanged or decreased scores were seen in 8% and 22% of patients, respectively.

“As we breakdown these data by deciles of baseline pain and function we see clearly that those starting at the lower decile improved the most, and that’s to be expected; they’ve a lot more to improve than the ones that came into the operation at the higher decile,” Dr. Pinedo-Villanueva said at the Congress, sponsored by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. But there were patients who fared worse at every decile, he noted.

Dr. Pinedo-Villanueva concluded that outcome prediction models were needed to try to reduce the number of patients who are apparently worse off after knee replacement and improve the efficiency of resource allocation.

The value of TKR in a contemporary U.S. population was the focus of a separate presentation by Dr. Bart Ferket of Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. Dr. Ferket reported the results of a study looking at the impact of TKR on patients’ quality of life, lifetime costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) while varying the use of TKR by patients’ functional status at baseline.

“In the United States, the rate at which total knee replacement is performed has doubled in the last two decades,” Dr. Ferket observed. This “disproportionate” increase has been attributed to expanding the eligibility criteria to include less symptomatic patients.

Using data collected over an 8-year period on 1,327 participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, Dr. Ferket and his associates at Mount Sinai and Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam (The Netherlands) discovered that the increased uptake of TKR might have affected the likely benefit and reduced the overall cost-effectiveness of the procedure.

At baseline, 17% of the participants, who all had knee osteoarthritis, had had a prior knee replacement.

Quality of life measured on the physical component scores (PCS) of the 12-item Short Form (SF-12) were generally improved after TKR but decreased in those who did not have a knee replaced. The effect on the mental component of the SF-12 was less clear, with possibly a decrease seen in some patients. Changes on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) showed a considerable benefit for knee replacement and there was a general decrease in pain medication over time in those who had surgery. The overall effect was more pronounced if patients with greater baseline symptoms were considered.

Cost-effectiveness modeling showed that reserving TKR for more seriously affected patients may make it more economically attractive. The QALYs gained from TKR was about 11 but as the number of QALYs increased, so did the relative lifetime cost, with increasing incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) as SF-12 PCS rose. ICERs were around $143,000, $160,000, $217,000, $385,000, and $1,175,000 considering patients with SF-12 PCS of less than 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50, respectively.

“The more lenient the eligibility criteria are, the higher the effectiveness, but also the higher the costs,” Dr. Ferket said. “The most cost-effective scenarios are actually more restrictive that what is currently seen in current practice in the U.S.”

Dr. Pinedo-Villanueva and Dr. Ferket reported having no financial disclosures.

AMSTERDAM – Patients with milder knee osteoarthritis symptoms or better quality of life before undergoing total knee replacement surgery gained less benefit from the surgery than did those who had more severe symptoms in two separate analyses of British and U.S. patients.

Additional evidence from total knee replacements (TKRs) performed on U.S. participants of the Osteoarthritis Initiative also suggest that as the use of TKR has increased to include less symptomatic patients, the overall cost-effectiveness of the procedure has declined.

©pixologicstudio/ thinkstockphotos.com

“Knee replacements are one of those interventions that are known to be very effective and very cost-effective,” Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva, Ph.D., of the University of Oxford (England) said during his presentation of National Health Service data from England at the World Congress on Osteoarthritis. Indeed, knee replacements are associated with significant improvements in pain, function, and quality of life, he said, but that is if you look at the mean values.

As the deciles for baseline knee pain and function decrease in severity, there are diminishing mean improvements and an increasing proportion of patients who do worse after the operation, he reported. Up to 17% of patients had unchanged or improved knee pain scores and up to 27% had lower quality of life scores. If minimally important differences were considered, these percentages rose to 40% and 48% of patients being worse off, respectively.

“The significant improvements seem to be overshadowing what happens to those patients who are doing worse,” Dr. Pinedo-Villanueva suggested. “So essentially cost-effectiveness is being driven by the magnitude of the change in those who do improve, and we don’t really see much about what is happening to those who are doing worse.”

Of over 215,000 records of knee replacement collected from all patients undergoing TKR in England during 2008-2012, Dr. Pinedo-Villanueva and his study coauthors found 117,844 had data on pre- and post-operative knee pain assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and quality of life measured with the EQ-5D instrument. The majority of replacements were in women (55%) and almost three quarters of patients had one or no comorbidities. Overall, the mean change in OKS was 15 points, improving from 19 to 34 (the higher the score the lesser the knee pain). EQ-5D scores also improved by a mean difference of 0.30 (from 0.41 to 0.70 where 1.0 is perfect health). Although the vast majority of patients had improved OKS and EQ-5D scores after surgery, unchanged or decreased scores were seen in 8% and 22% of patients, respectively.

“As we breakdown these data by deciles of baseline pain and function we see clearly that those starting at the lower decile improved the most, and that’s to be expected; they’ve a lot more to improve than the ones that came into the operation at the higher decile,” Dr. Pinedo-Villanueva said at the Congress, sponsored by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. But there were patients who fared worse at every decile, he noted.

Dr. Pinedo-Villanueva concluded that outcome prediction models were needed to try to reduce the number of patients who are apparently worse off after knee replacement and improve the efficiency of resource allocation.

The value of TKR in a contemporary U.S. population was the focus of a separate presentation by Dr. Bart Ferket of Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. Dr. Ferket reported the results of a study looking at the impact of TKR on patients’ quality of life, lifetime costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) while varying the use of TKR by patients’ functional status at baseline.

“In the United States, the rate at which total knee replacement is performed has doubled in the last two decades,” Dr. Ferket observed. This “disproportionate” increase has been attributed to expanding the eligibility criteria to include less symptomatic patients.

Using data collected over an 8-year period on 1,327 participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, Dr. Ferket and his associates at Mount Sinai and Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam (The Netherlands) discovered that the increased uptake of TKR might have affected the likely benefit and reduced the overall cost-effectiveness of the procedure.

At baseline, 17% of the participants, who all had knee osteoarthritis, had had a prior knee replacement.

Quality of life measured on the physical component scores (PCS) of the 12-item Short Form (SF-12) were generally improved after TKR but decreased in those who did not have a knee replaced. The effect on the mental component of the SF-12 was less clear, with possibly a decrease seen in some patients. Changes on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) showed a considerable benefit for knee replacement and there was a general decrease in pain medication over time in those who had surgery. The overall effect was more pronounced if patients with greater baseline symptoms were considered.

Cost-effectiveness modeling showed that reserving TKR for more seriously affected patients may make it more economically attractive. The QALYs gained from TKR was about 11 but as the number of QALYs increased, so did the relative lifetime cost, with increasing incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) as SF-12 PCS rose. ICERs were around $143,000, $160,000, $217,000, $385,000, and $1,175,000 considering patients with SF-12 PCS of less than 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50, respectively.

“The more lenient the eligibility criteria are, the higher the effectiveness, but also the higher the costs,” Dr. Ferket said. “The most cost-effective scenarios are actually more restrictive that what is currently seen in current practice in the U.S.”

Dr. Pinedo-Villanueva and Dr. Ferket reported having no financial disclosures.

Steatosis may be present in at least half of liver transplant recipients, and the prevalence increases significantly over time, according to data from a retrospective study of 548 adult patients.

Although steatosis is common after transplantation, the prevalence, risk factors, and impact on patient survival has not been well studied, wrote Dr. Irena Hejlova of the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine in Prague, Czech Republic, and her colleagues.

Courtesy of Wikimedia / Nephron / Creative Commons License

“Our study was the first to document that the prevalence of steatosis in LT [liver transplant] recipients may be far higher than previously reported,” they said.

The researchers reviewed liver biopsies and patient survival data and found steatosis in 309 (56%) of the patients, including 93 (17%) with significant steatosis (defined as greater than 33%). Pretransplant factors associated with significant steatosis included cirrhosis caused by alcohol consumption as well as a high body mass index. Post-transplant risk factors associated with increased risk of significant steatosis included increased body mass index, increased serum triglycerides, alcohol consumption, and type 2 diabetes. However, “Although patients transplanted for alcoholic cirrhosis are at an increased risk, the vast majority of post-transplant steatosis is nonalcohol-related,” the researchers noted.

The overall prevalence of steatosis increased from 30% at 1 year after transplant to 48% at 10 years after transplant. Post-transplant steatosis was not associated with worse patient survival in the short term, but the long-term survival of patients with significant steatosis tended to be worse.

Read the full study here (Liver Transpl. 2016 Apr 5. doi: 10.1002/lt.24393).

Steatosis may be present in at least half of liver transplant recipients, and the prevalence increases significantly over time, according to data from a retrospective study of 548 adult patients.

Although steatosis is common after transplantation, the prevalence, risk factors, and impact on patient survival has not been well studied, wrote Dr. Irena Hejlova of the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine in Prague, Czech Republic, and her colleagues.

Courtesy of Wikimedia / Nephron / Creative Commons License

“Our study was the first to document that the prevalence of steatosis in LT [liver transplant] recipients may be far higher than previously reported,” they said.

The researchers reviewed liver biopsies and patient survival data and found steatosis in 309 (56%) of the patients, including 93 (17%) with significant steatosis (defined as greater than 33%). Pretransplant factors associated with significant steatosis included cirrhosis caused by alcohol consumption as well as a high body mass index. Post-transplant risk factors associated with increased risk of significant steatosis included increased body mass index, increased serum triglycerides, alcohol consumption, and type 2 diabetes. However, “Although patients transplanted for alcoholic cirrhosis are at an increased risk, the vast majority of post-transplant steatosis is nonalcohol-related,” the researchers noted.

The overall prevalence of steatosis increased from 30% at 1 year after transplant to 48% at 10 years after transplant. Post-transplant steatosis was not associated with worse patient survival in the short term, but the long-term survival of patients with significant steatosis tended to be worse.

Read the full study here (Liver Transpl. 2016 Apr 5. doi: 10.1002/lt.24393).

Steatosis may be present in at least half of liver transplant recipients, and the prevalence increases significantly over time, according to data from a retrospective study of 548 adult patients.

Although steatosis is common after transplantation, the prevalence, risk factors, and impact on patient survival has not been well studied, wrote Dr. Irena Hejlova of the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine in Prague, Czech Republic, and her colleagues.

Courtesy of Wikimedia / Nephron / Creative Commons License

“Our study was the first to document that the prevalence of steatosis in LT [liver transplant] recipients may be far higher than previously reported,” they said.

The researchers reviewed liver biopsies and patient survival data and found steatosis in 309 (56%) of the patients, including 93 (17%) with significant steatosis (defined as greater than 33%). Pretransplant factors associated with significant steatosis included cirrhosis caused by alcohol consumption as well as a high body mass index. Post-transplant risk factors associated with increased risk of significant steatosis included increased body mass index, increased serum triglycerides, alcohol consumption, and type 2 diabetes. However, “Although patients transplanted for alcoholic cirrhosis are at an increased risk, the vast majority of post-transplant steatosis is nonalcohol-related,” the researchers noted.

The overall prevalence of steatosis increased from 30% at 1 year after transplant to 48% at 10 years after transplant. Post-transplant steatosis was not associated with worse patient survival in the short term, but the long-term survival of patients with significant steatosis tended to be worse.

Read the full study here (Liver Transpl. 2016 Apr 5. doi: 10.1002/lt.24393).

CHICAGO – The largest-ever randomized trial of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation has ended in a draw between radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation in safety and efficacy – and that actually represents a win for cryoablation, a simpler and far more easily mastered procedure, Dr. Karl-Heinz Kuck said at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

“We can teach physicians how to do cryoablation much more easily. That will allow more patients with atrial fibrillation to get access to catheter ablation, which is what we really need,” according to Dr. Kuck, principal investigator in the poetically named FIRE AND ICE trial and head of cardiology at St. Georg Hospital in Hamburg (Germany).

FIRE AND ICE included 769 patients in eight European countries. The participants, all of whom had antiarrhythmic drug–refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), were randomized to radiofrequency ablation – the long-time standard – or to cryoablation, a newer technology. Radiofrequency ablation was guided by three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping, while cryoablation utilized fluoroscopic guidance.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the 1-year rate of clinical failure, defined as an occurrence of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting for at least 30 seconds, or repeat ablation or the use of antiarrhythmic drugs following a 90-day postprocedural blanking period. The clinical failure rate was 34.6% in the cryoballoon group and similar at 35.9% in the radiofrequency group.

Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 10.2% of the cryoballoon group and 12.8% of the radiofrequency group, a nonsignificant difference. No procedural deaths occurred in the study.

There were, however, several significant procedural differences. Procedure time averaged 124 minutes in the cryoablation group, nearly 20 minutes less than the 142 minutes for radiofrequency ablation. However, the 17-minute fluoroscopy time in the radiofrequency group was 5 minutes shorter than for cryoablation.

Dr. Kuck said the study underestimates the true procedural differences because FIRE AND ICE was carried out by extremely experienced operators. In routine clinical practice involving non-elite operators, it’s not unusual for radiofrequency ablation fluoroscopy times to be two or even three times longer than the 17 minutes seen in the study. Plus, FIRE AND ICE was conducted when the procedure entailed two applications of the cryoballoon. Now only one application is recommended, cutting an additional 12 minutes off the total procedure time, he added.

Radiofrequency ablation takes longer because it entails creating a series of point-to-point lesions in a circle to isolate the pulmonary veins. With cryoablation, the balloon is moved into position, inflated, and a 3-minute-freeze is administered to create a circle of necrotic tissue in a single-step procedure.

Discussant Dr. Hugh G. Calkins praised the FIRE AND ICE investigators’ use of a rigorous definition of recurrence that required as little as a 30-second episode of atrial arrhythmia.

“That’s a very high bar, so I think the results are very impressive,” said Dr. Calkins, professor of medicine and of pediatrics and director of the cardiac arrhythmia service at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

He commented that “this study is a clear reminder that 90% success rates just don’t happen in this field,” despite what some practitioners have claimed.

Asked how he predicts the study results will influence the field of AF ablation, Dr. Kuck replied that he foresees much wider adoption of cryoablation and a stronger endorsement of the technology in updated guideline recommendations.

“I personally believe this will be the most important development in our field in the next several years,” he added.

The electrophysiologist noted that even though current guidelines give a class Ia recommendation to catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF that’s refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic drug, at present only 4% of such patients actually undergo the procedure.

“Having just 4% of patients with AF undergo catheter ablation cannot be what we are looking for as physicians,” Dr. Kuck said. “I believe if we want to roll out catheter ablation for AF, we need simple and safe tools. This trial elegantly shows that with a simpler device that allows single-shot isolation of the pulmonary veins, we can get the same safety and efficacy as with radiofrequency ablation. I often tell people that radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation is the most challenging procedure in all cardiology. We do this procedure from the groin in a moving heart. It’s a very complex technology.”

His dream, he continued, is that cryoablation will eventually enable patients with atrial fibrillation to be managed the same way electrophysiologists treat patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome; with the first episode, the patient goes to the electrophysiology catheterization lab for an ablation procedure.

“I think there’s a great message here: The cryoballoon will move catheter ablation from a niche procedure performed in specialized centers by the few guys in the world who can do it really well out into the broader world. To do that you need a tool that is safe, simple, and can be handled by the average doctor,” Dr. Kuck said.

Discussant Dr. Anthony DeMaria commented that it would be premature at this point to start thinking about cryoablation as a first approach to new-onset AF, given the roughly 35% clinical failure rate at 1 year seen in FIRE AND ICE. That rate doubtless would have been even higher had patients been equipped with implantable loop recorders, added Dr. DeMaria, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego.

Dr. Kuck conceded that the high recurrence rate is one of the great unsolved limitations of catheter ablation of AF.

“We don’t know how to get the pulmonary veins permanently isolated,” he said. “We can create acute lesions, but over time what we’ve seen is recovery of tissue and then reconduction by the pulmonary veins. I believe that 20% of the 40% recurrence rate is due to reconduction from the pulmonary veins, and the rest is probably due to triggers coming from other sites.”

The FIRE AND ICE trial was funded in part by Medtronic, which markets the Arctic Front Advance cryoablation catheter used in the study. Dr. Kuck reported serving on a speakers’ bureau for Medtronic and acting as a consultant to Biosense Webster, Edwards, and St. Jude.

Simultaneous with Dr. Kuck’s presentation at ACC 16, the results of FIRE AND ICE were published online (N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602014).

[email protected]

CHICAGO – The largest-ever randomized trial of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation has ended in a draw between radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation in safety and efficacy – and that actually represents a win for cryoablation, a simpler and far more easily mastered procedure, Dr. Karl-Heinz Kuck said at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

“We can teach physicians how to do cryoablation much more easily. That will allow more patients with atrial fibrillation to get access to catheter ablation, which is what we really need,” according to Dr. Kuck, principal investigator in the poetically named FIRE AND ICE trial and head of cardiology at St. Georg Hospital in Hamburg (Germany).

FIRE AND ICE included 769 patients in eight European countries. The participants, all of whom had antiarrhythmic drug–refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), were randomized to radiofrequency ablation – the long-time standard – or to cryoablation, a newer technology. Radiofrequency ablation was guided by three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping, while cryoablation utilized fluoroscopic guidance.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the 1-year rate of clinical failure, defined as an occurrence of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting for at least 30 seconds, or repeat ablation or the use of antiarrhythmic drugs following a 90-day postprocedural blanking period. The clinical failure rate was 34.6% in the cryoballoon group and similar at 35.9% in the radiofrequency group.

Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 10.2% of the cryoballoon group and 12.8% of the radiofrequency group, a nonsignificant difference. No procedural deaths occurred in the study.

There were, however, several significant procedural differences. Procedure time averaged 124 minutes in the cryoablation group, nearly 20 minutes less than the 142 minutes for radiofrequency ablation. However, the 17-minute fluoroscopy time in the radiofrequency group was 5 minutes shorter than for cryoablation.

Dr. Kuck said the study underestimates the true procedural differences because FIRE AND ICE was carried out by extremely experienced operators. In routine clinical practice involving non-elite operators, it’s not unusual for radiofrequency ablation fluoroscopy times to be two or even three times longer than the 17 minutes seen in the study. Plus, FIRE AND ICE was conducted when the procedure entailed two applications of the cryoballoon. Now only one application is recommended, cutting an additional 12 minutes off the total procedure time, he added.

Radiofrequency ablation takes longer because it entails creating a series of point-to-point lesions in a circle to isolate the pulmonary veins. With cryoablation, the balloon is moved into position, inflated, and a 3-minute-freeze is administered to create a circle of necrotic tissue in a single-step procedure.

Discussant Dr. Hugh G. Calkins praised the FIRE AND ICE investigators’ use of a rigorous definition of recurrence that required as little as a 30-second episode of atrial arrhythmia.

“That’s a very high bar, so I think the results are very impressive,” said Dr. Calkins, professor of medicine and of pediatrics and director of the cardiac arrhythmia service at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

He commented that “this study is a clear reminder that 90% success rates just don’t happen in this field,” despite what some practitioners have claimed.

Asked how he predicts the study results will influence the field of AF ablation, Dr. Kuck replied that he foresees much wider adoption of cryoablation and a stronger endorsement of the technology in updated guideline recommendations.

“I personally believe this will be the most important development in our field in the next several years,” he added.

The electrophysiologist noted that even though current guidelines give a class Ia recommendation to catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF that’s refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic drug, at present only 4% of such patients actually undergo the procedure.

“Having just 4% of patients with AF undergo catheter ablation cannot be what we are looking for as physicians,” Dr. Kuck said. “I believe if we want to roll out catheter ablation for AF, we need simple and safe tools. This trial elegantly shows that with a simpler device that allows single-shot isolation of the pulmonary veins, we can get the same safety and efficacy as with radiofrequency ablation. I often tell people that radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation is the most challenging procedure in all cardiology. We do this procedure from the groin in a moving heart. It’s a very complex technology.”

His dream, he continued, is that cryoablation will eventually enable patients with atrial fibrillation to be managed the same way electrophysiologists treat patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome; with the first episode, the patient goes to the electrophysiology catheterization lab for an ablation procedure.

“I think there’s a great message here: The cryoballoon will move catheter ablation from a niche procedure performed in specialized centers by the few guys in the world who can do it really well out into the broader world. To do that you need a tool that is safe, simple, and can be handled by the average doctor,” Dr. Kuck said.

Discussant Dr. Anthony DeMaria commented that it would be premature at this point to start thinking about cryoablation as a first approach to new-onset AF, given the roughly 35% clinical failure rate at 1 year seen in FIRE AND ICE. That rate doubtless would have been even higher had patients been equipped with implantable loop recorders, added Dr. DeMaria, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego.

Dr. Kuck conceded that the high recurrence rate is one of the great unsolved limitations of catheter ablation of AF.

“We don’t know how to get the pulmonary veins permanently isolated,” he said. “We can create acute lesions, but over time what we’ve seen is recovery of tissue and then reconduction by the pulmonary veins. I believe that 20% of the 40% recurrence rate is due to reconduction from the pulmonary veins, and the rest is probably due to triggers coming from other sites.”

The FIRE AND ICE trial was funded in part by Medtronic, which markets the Arctic Front Advance cryoablation catheter used in the study. Dr. Kuck reported serving on a speakers’ bureau for Medtronic and acting as a consultant to Biosense Webster, Edwards, and St. Jude.

Simultaneous with Dr. Kuck’s presentation at ACC 16, the results of FIRE AND ICE were published online (N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602014).

[email protected]

CHICAGO – The largest-ever randomized trial of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation has ended in a draw between radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation in safety and efficacy – and that actually represents a win for cryoablation, a simpler and far more easily mastered procedure, Dr. Karl-Heinz Kuck said at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

“We can teach physicians how to do cryoablation much more easily. That will allow more patients with atrial fibrillation to get access to catheter ablation, which is what we really need,” according to Dr. Kuck, principal investigator in the poetically named FIRE AND ICE trial and head of cardiology at St. Georg Hospital in Hamburg (Germany).

FIRE AND ICE included 769 patients in eight European countries. The participants, all of whom had antiarrhythmic drug–refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), were randomized to radiofrequency ablation – the long-time standard – or to cryoablation, a newer technology. Radiofrequency ablation was guided by three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping, while cryoablation utilized fluoroscopic guidance.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the 1-year rate of clinical failure, defined as an occurrence of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting for at least 30 seconds, or repeat ablation or the use of antiarrhythmic drugs following a 90-day postprocedural blanking period. The clinical failure rate was 34.6% in the cryoballoon group and similar at 35.9% in the radiofrequency group.

Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 10.2% of the cryoballoon group and 12.8% of the radiofrequency group, a nonsignificant difference. No procedural deaths occurred in the study.

There were, however, several significant procedural differences. Procedure time averaged 124 minutes in the cryoablation group, nearly 20 minutes less than the 142 minutes for radiofrequency ablation. However, the 17-minute fluoroscopy time in the radiofrequency group was 5 minutes shorter than for cryoablation.

Dr. Kuck said the study underestimates the true procedural differences because FIRE AND ICE was carried out by extremely experienced operators. In routine clinical practice involving non-elite operators, it’s not unusual for radiofrequency ablation fluoroscopy times to be two or even three times longer than the 17 minutes seen in the study. Plus, FIRE AND ICE was conducted when the procedure entailed two applications of the cryoballoon. Now only one application is recommended, cutting an additional 12 minutes off the total procedure time, he added.

Radiofrequency ablation takes longer because it entails creating a series of point-to-point lesions in a circle to isolate the pulmonary veins. With cryoablation, the balloon is moved into position, inflated, and a 3-minute-freeze is administered to create a circle of necrotic tissue in a single-step procedure.

Discussant Dr. Hugh G. Calkins praised the FIRE AND ICE investigators’ use of a rigorous definition of recurrence that required as little as a 30-second episode of atrial arrhythmia.

“That’s a very high bar, so I think the results are very impressive,” said Dr. Calkins, professor of medicine and of pediatrics and director of the cardiac arrhythmia service at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

He commented that “this study is a clear reminder that 90% success rates just don’t happen in this field,” despite what some practitioners have claimed.

Asked how he predicts the study results will influence the field of AF ablation, Dr. Kuck replied that he foresees much wider adoption of cryoablation and a stronger endorsement of the technology in updated guideline recommendations.

“I personally believe this will be the most important development in our field in the next several years,” he added.

The electrophysiologist noted that even though current guidelines give a class Ia recommendation to catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF that’s refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic drug, at present only 4% of such patients actually undergo the procedure.

“Having just 4% of patients with AF undergo catheter ablation cannot be what we are looking for as physicians,” Dr. Kuck said. “I believe if we want to roll out catheter ablation for AF, we need simple and safe tools. This trial elegantly shows that with a simpler device that allows single-shot isolation of the pulmonary veins, we can get the same safety and efficacy as with radiofrequency ablation. I often tell people that radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation is the most challenging procedure in all cardiology. We do this procedure from the groin in a moving heart. It’s a very complex technology.”

His dream, he continued, is that cryoablation will eventually enable patients with atrial fibrillation to be managed the same way electrophysiologists treat patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome; with the first episode, the patient goes to the electrophysiology catheterization lab for an ablation procedure.

“I think there’s a great message here: The cryoballoon will move catheter ablation from a niche procedure performed in specialized centers by the few guys in the world who can do it really well out into the broader world. To do that you need a tool that is safe, simple, and can be handled by the average doctor,” Dr. Kuck said.

Discussant Dr. Anthony DeMaria commented that it would be premature at this point to start thinking about cryoablation as a first approach to new-onset AF, given the roughly 35% clinical failure rate at 1 year seen in FIRE AND ICE. That rate doubtless would have been even higher had patients been equipped with implantable loop recorders, added Dr. DeMaria, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego.

Dr. Kuck conceded that the high recurrence rate is one of the great unsolved limitations of catheter ablation of AF.

“We don’t know how to get the pulmonary veins permanently isolated,” he said. “We can create acute lesions, but over time what we’ve seen is recovery of tissue and then reconduction by the pulmonary veins. I believe that 20% of the 40% recurrence rate is due to reconduction from the pulmonary veins, and the rest is probably due to triggers coming from other sites.”

The FIRE AND ICE trial was funded in part by Medtronic, which markets the Arctic Front Advance cryoablation catheter used in the study. Dr. Kuck reported serving on a speakers’ bureau for Medtronic and acting as a consultant to Biosense Webster, Edwards, and St. Jude.

Simultaneous with Dr. Kuck’s presentation at ACC 16, the results of FIRE AND ICE were published online (N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602014).

[email protected]

CHICAGO – Rate and rhythm control proved equally effective for treatment of new-onset post–cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation in a randomized trial that was far and away the largest ever to examine the best way to address this common and costly arrhythmia, Dr. A. Marc Gillinov said at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

Thus, either strategy is acceptable. That being said, rate control gets the edge as the initial treatment strategy because it avoids the considerable toxicities accompanying amiodarone for rhythm control, most of which arise only after patients have been discharged from the hospital. In contrast, when rate control doesn’t work, it becomes evident while the patient is still in the hospital, according to Dr. Gillinov, a cardiothoracic surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic .

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common complication of cardiac surgery, with an incidence variously reported at 20%-50%. It results in lengthier hospital stays, greater cost of care, and increased risks of mortality, stroke, heart failure, and infection. Postoperative AF adds an estimated $1 billion per year to health care costs in the United States.

While current ACC/AHA/Heart Rhythm Society joint guidelines recommend rate control with a beta-blocker as first-line therapy for patients with this postoperative complication, with a class I, level-of-evidence A rating, upon closer inspection the evidence cited mainly involves extrapolation from studies looking at how to prevent postoperative AF. Because no persuasive evidence existed as to how best to treat this common and economically and medically costly condition, Dr. Gillinov and his coinvestigators in the National Institutes of Health–funded Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network carried out a randomized trial 10-fold larger than anything prior.

The 23-site study included 2,109 patients enrolled prior to cardiac surgery, of whom 40% underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) while the other 60% had valve surgery, either alone or with CABG. These proportions reflect current cardiac surgery treatment patterns nationally. Overall, 33% of the cardiac surgery patients experienced postoperative AF. The incidence was 28% in patients who underwent isolated CABG but rose with increasing surgical complexity to nearly 50% in patients who had combined CABG and valve operations. The average time to onset of postoperative AF was 2.4 days.

A total of 523 patients with postoperative AF were randomized to rate or rhythm control. Rate control most often entailed use of a beta-blocker, while amiodarone was prescribed for rhythm control.

The primary endpoint in the trial was a measure of health care resource utilization: total days in hospital during a 60-day period starting from the time of randomization. This endpoint was a draw: a median of 5.1 days with rate control and 5.0 days with rhythm control.

At hospital discharge, 89.9% of patients in the rate control group and 93.5% in the rhythm control group had a stable heart rhythm without AF. From discharge to 60 days, 84.2% of patients in the rate control group and a similar 86.9% of the rhythm control group remained free of AF.

Rates of serious adverse events were similar in the two groups: 24.8 per 100 patient-months in the rate control arm and 26.4 per 100 patient-months in the rhythm control arm. Three patients in the rate control arm died during the 60-day study period, and two died in the rhythm control group.

Of note, roughly one-quarter of patients in each study arm crossed over to the other arm. In the rate control group, this was typically due to drug ineffectiveness, while in the rhythm control arm the switch was most often made in response to amiodarone side effects.

Roughly 43% of patients in each group were placed on anticoagulation with warfarin for 60 days according to study protocol, which called for such action if a patient remained in AF 48 hours after randomization.

There were five strokes, one case of transient ischemic attack, and four noncerebral thromboembolisms. Also, 21 bleeding events occurred, 17 of which were classified as serious; 90% of the bleeding events happened in patients on warfarin.

“I found the results very striking and very reassuring,” said discussant Hugh G. Calkins. “To me, the clinical message is clearly that rate control is the preference.”

It was troubling, however, to see that 10 thromboembolic events occurred in 523 patients over the course of just 60 days. “Should we be anticoagulating these postsurgical atrial fibrillation patients a lot more frequently?” asked Dr. Calkins, professor of medicine and of pediatrics and director of the cardiac arrhythmia service at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

Dr. Gillinov replied that he and his colleagues in the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network consider that to be the key remaining question regarding postoperative AF. They are now planning a clinical trial aimed at finding the optimal balance between stroke protection via anticoagulation and bleeding risk.

The National Institutes of Health and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research funded the work. Dr. Gillinov reported serving as a consultant to five surgical device companies, none of which played any role in the study.

Simultaneously with Dr. Gillinov’s presentation at ACC 16, the study results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine (doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602002).

[email protected]

CHICAGO – Rate and rhythm control proved equally effective for treatment of new-onset post–cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation in a randomized trial that was far and away the largest ever to examine the best way to address this common and costly arrhythmia, Dr. A. Marc Gillinov said at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

Thus, either strategy is acceptable. That being said, rate control gets the edge as the initial treatment strategy because it avoids the considerable toxicities accompanying amiodarone for rhythm control, most of which arise only after patients have been discharged from the hospital. In contrast, when rate control doesn’t work, it becomes evident while the patient is still in the hospital, according to Dr. Gillinov, a cardiothoracic surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic .

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common complication of cardiac surgery, with an incidence variously reported at 20%-50%. It results in lengthier hospital stays, greater cost of care, and increased risks of mortality, stroke, heart failure, and infection. Postoperative AF adds an estimated $1 billion per year to health care costs in the United States.

While current ACC/AHA/Heart Rhythm Society joint guidelines recommend rate control with a beta-blocker as first-line therapy for patients with this postoperative complication, with a class I, level-of-evidence A rating, upon closer inspection the evidence cited mainly involves extrapolation from studies looking at how to prevent postoperative AF. Because no persuasive evidence existed as to how best to treat this common and economically and medically costly condition, Dr. Gillinov and his coinvestigators in the National Institutes of Health–funded Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network carried out a randomized trial 10-fold larger than anything prior.

The 23-site study included 2,109 patients enrolled prior to cardiac surgery, of whom 40% underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) while the other 60% had valve surgery, either alone or with CABG. These proportions reflect current cardiac surgery treatment patterns nationally. Overall, 33% of the cardiac surgery patients experienced postoperative AF. The incidence was 28% in patients who underwent isolated CABG but rose with increasing surgical complexity to nearly 50% in patients who had combined CABG and valve operations. The average time to onset of postoperative AF was 2.4 days.

A total of 523 patients with postoperative AF were randomized to rate or rhythm control. Rate control most often entailed use of a beta-blocker, while amiodarone was prescribed for rhythm control.

The primary endpoint in the trial was a measure of health care resource utilization: total days in hospital during a 60-day period starting from the time of randomization. This endpoint was a draw: a median of 5.1 days with rate control and 5.0 days with rhythm control.

At hospital discharge, 89.9% of patients in the rate control group and 93.5% in the rhythm control group had a stable heart rhythm without AF. From discharge to 60 days, 84.2% of patients in the rate control group and a similar 86.9% of the rhythm control group remained free of AF.

Rates of serious adverse events were similar in the two groups: 24.8 per 100 patient-months in the rate control arm and 26.4 per 100 patient-months in the rhythm control arm. Three patients in the rate control arm died during the 60-day study period, and two died in the rhythm control group.

Of note, roughly one-quarter of patients in each study arm crossed over to the other arm. In the rate control group, this was typically due to drug ineffectiveness, while in the rhythm control arm the switch was most often made in response to amiodarone side effects.

Roughly 43% of patients in each group were placed on anticoagulation with warfarin for 60 days according to study protocol, which called for such action if a patient remained in AF 48 hours after randomization.

There were five strokes, one case of transient ischemic attack, and four noncerebral thromboembolisms. Also, 21 bleeding events occurred, 17 of which were classified as serious; 90% of the bleeding events happened in patients on warfarin.

“I found the results very striking and very reassuring,” said discussant Hugh G. Calkins. “To me, the clinical message is clearly that rate control is the preference.”

It was troubling, however, to see that 10 thromboembolic events occurred in 523 patients over the course of just 60 days. “Should we be anticoagulating these postsurgical atrial fibrillation patients a lot more frequently?” asked Dr. Calkins, professor of medicine and of pediatrics and director of the cardiac arrhythmia service at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

Dr. Gillinov replied that he and his colleagues in the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network consider that to be the key remaining question regarding postoperative AF. They are now planning a clinical trial aimed at finding the optimal balance between stroke protection via anticoagulation and bleeding risk.

The National Institutes of Health and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research funded the work. Dr. Gillinov reported serving as a consultant to five surgical device companies, none of which played any role in the study.

Simultaneously with Dr. Gillinov’s presentation at ACC 16, the study results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine (doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602002).

[email protected]

CHICAGO – Rate and rhythm control proved equally effective for treatment of new-onset post–cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation in a randomized trial that was far and away the largest ever to examine the best way to address this common and costly arrhythmia, Dr. A. Marc Gillinov said at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

Thus, either strategy is acceptable. That being said, rate control gets the edge as the initial treatment strategy because it avoids the considerable toxicities accompanying amiodarone for rhythm control, most of which arise only after patients have been discharged from the hospital. In contrast, when rate control doesn’t work, it becomes evident while the patient is still in the hospital, according to Dr. Gillinov, a cardiothoracic surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic .

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common complication of cardiac surgery, with an incidence variously reported at 20%-50%. It results in lengthier hospital stays, greater cost of care, and increased risks of mortality, stroke, heart failure, and infection. Postoperative AF adds an estimated $1 billion per year to health care costs in the United States.

While current ACC/AHA/Heart Rhythm Society joint guidelines recommend rate control with a beta-blocker as first-line therapy for patients with this postoperative complication, with a class I, level-of-evidence A rating, upon closer inspection the evidence cited mainly involves extrapolation from studies looking at how to prevent postoperative AF. Because no persuasive evidence existed as to how best to treat this common and economically and medically costly condition, Dr. Gillinov and his coinvestigators in the National Institutes of Health–funded Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network carried out a randomized trial 10-fold larger than anything prior.

The 23-site study included 2,109 patients enrolled prior to cardiac surgery, of whom 40% underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) while the other 60% had valve surgery, either alone or with CABG. These proportions reflect current cardiac surgery treatment patterns nationally. Overall, 33% of the cardiac surgery patients experienced postoperative AF. The incidence was 28% in patients who underwent isolated CABG but rose with increasing surgical complexity to nearly 50% in patients who had combined CABG and valve operations. The average time to onset of postoperative AF was 2.4 days.

A total of 523 patients with postoperative AF were randomized to rate or rhythm control. Rate control most often entailed use of a beta-blocker, while amiodarone was prescribed for rhythm control.

The primary endpoint in the trial was a measure of health care resource utilization: total days in hospital during a 60-day period starting from the time of randomization. This endpoint was a draw: a median of 5.1 days with rate control and 5.0 days with rhythm control.

At hospital discharge, 89.9% of patients in the rate control group and 93.5% in the rhythm control group had a stable heart rhythm without AF. From discharge to 60 days, 84.2% of patients in the rate control group and a similar 86.9% of the rhythm control group remained free of AF.

Rates of serious adverse events were similar in the two groups: 24.8 per 100 patient-months in the rate control arm and 26.4 per 100 patient-months in the rhythm control arm. Three patients in the rate control arm died during the 60-day study period, and two died in the rhythm control group.

Of note, roughly one-quarter of patients in each study arm crossed over to the other arm. In the rate control group, this was typically due to drug ineffectiveness, while in the rhythm control arm the switch was most often made in response to amiodarone side effects.

Roughly 43% of patients in each group were placed on anticoagulation with warfarin for 60 days according to study protocol, which called for such action if a patient remained in AF 48 hours after randomization.

There were five strokes, one case of transient ischemic attack, and four noncerebral thromboembolisms. Also, 21 bleeding events occurred, 17 of which were classified as serious; 90% of the bleeding events happened in patients on warfarin.

“I found the results very striking and very reassuring,” said discussant Hugh G. Calkins. “To me, the clinical message is clearly that rate control is the preference.”

It was troubling, however, to see that 10 thromboembolic events occurred in 523 patients over the course of just 60 days. “Should we be anticoagulating these postsurgical atrial fibrillation patients a lot more frequently?” asked Dr. Calkins, professor of medicine and of pediatrics and director of the cardiac arrhythmia service at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

Dr. Gillinov replied that he and his colleagues in the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network consider that to be the key remaining question regarding postoperative AF. They are now planning a clinical trial aimed at finding the optimal balance between stroke protection via anticoagulation and bleeding risk.

The National Institutes of Health and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research funded the work. Dr. Gillinov reported serving as a consultant to five surgical device companies, none of which played any role in the study.

Simultaneously with Dr. Gillinov’s presentation at ACC 16, the study results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine (doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602002).

[email protected]