Official Newspaper of the American College of Surgeons

Top Sections
From the Editor
Palliative Care
The Right Choice?
The Rural Surgeon
sn
Main menu
SN Main Menu
Explore menu
SN Explore Menu
Proclivity ID
18821001
Unpublish
Specialty Focus
Pain
Colon and Rectal
General Surgery
Plastic Surgery
Cardiothoracic
Altmetric
Article Authors "autobrand" affiliation
MDedge News
DSM Affiliated
Display in offset block
Disqus Exclude
Best Practices
CE/CME
Education Center
Medical Education Library
Enable Disqus
Display Author and Disclosure Link
Publication Type
News
Slot System
Top 25
Disable Sticky Ads
Disable Ad Block Mitigation
Featured Buckets Admin
Show Ads on this Publication's Homepage
Consolidated Pub
Show Article Page Numbers on TOC
Display logo in consolidated pubs except when content has these publications
Use larger logo size
Off
publication_blueconic_enabled
Off
Show More Destinations Menu
Disable Adhesion on Publication
Off
Restore Menu Label on Mobile Navigation
Disable Facebook Pixel from Publication
Exclude this publication from publication selection on articles and quiz

Are Hysterectomies Really on the Decline?

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 16:11
Display Headline
Are Hysterectomies Really on the Decline?

LAS VEGAS – The number of hysterectomies in the United States appears to be on the decline, despite a 10% increase in minimally invasive cases.

Based on updated surveillance data, an estimated 479,229 hysterectomies were performed in the United States in 2009, of which 24% used a laparoscopic approach.

Patrice Wendling/IMNG Medical Media
Dr. Sarah Cohen

By comparison, there were 518,828 hysterectomies in 2005, 14% of which were laparoscopic: 64% were abdominal and 22% were vaginal (Obstet. Gynecol. 2009;114:1041-8).

Whether this represents a real decline in hysterectomies is unclear, Dr. Sarah Cohen of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston said at the 41st AAGL Global Congress.

The current analysis included oncologic cases, whereas the 2005 analysis looked only at gynecologic hysterectomies for benign disease.

On the other hand, both analyses are based on the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), which represents a 20% stratified random sample of discharges from all community hospitals in the United States. It is the largest national all-payer database of hospital discharges, but that’s where it stops.

"It’s possible that there are a number of nonsurgical options being offered to patients; however, I do think this also represents the increase in outpatient surgeries being offered, and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases aren’t able to account for those," she said. "Particularly, we may be underestimating laparoscopic and vaginal procedures that are being done in ambulatory settings."

Hysterectomy is the most common nonobstetric surgical procedure among women, with 600,000 typically cited as the annual number of procedures.

Dr. Cohen and her colleagues sought to verify this number using ICD-9 codes in the 2009 NIS – the most recent year available – to abstract information about any patient who underwent a hysterectomy during her hospitalization, including oncologic cases. Obstetric hysterectomies were excluded. The data were then weighted to give national estimates.

The mean patient age was 48 years, and the predominant indications were uterine fibroids (47%) and menstrual disorders (45%). Adnexal surgery occurred in 57% of cases.

Abdominal hysterectomy made up 58% of cases and vaginal hysterectomy 17% in the updated analysis, compared with 64% and 22% in the 2005 NIS, Dr. Cohen said.

In regression analysis, factors associated with laparoscopic surgery compared with abdominal surgery were younger age, white race, an indication of prolapse, menstrual disorder or endometriosis, living in an urban area, having a high income, having private insurance, and living in the Western United States.

When the regressions were repeated to compare laparoscopic with vaginal surgery, factors favoring the laparoscopic approach were age 40-49, black race, any nonprolapse indication, concomitant adnexal surgery, living in an urban area, having a high income, having private insurance, and living in the Northeastern United States.

Based on a systematic review of the literature, seven articles have been published in the past 5 years regarding hysterectomy surveillance, Dr. Cohen observed.

Although the NIS database may be incomplete, the bidirectional trends of falling overall numbers and rising laparoscopic procedures appear to be holding. An analysis of the 2003 NIS revealed 602,457 hysterectomies, with the abdominal route the most common at 66%, followed by the vaginal (22%) and laparoscopic (12%) routes (Obstet. Gynecol. 2007;110:1091-5).

Dr. Cohen said it’s critical to continue evaluating trends in hysterectomy performance, particularly with increasing outpatient minimally invasive procedures, and that he and his colleagues plan to incorporate state-level ambulatory surgery databases to capture outpatient procedures. They also will perform subgroup analyses of benign and oncologic cases, and look at factors associated with concomitant adnexal procedures.

Dr. Cohen reported no relevant financial disclosures.

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
hysterectomy, Dr. Sara Cohen, laparoscopic hysterectomy, 41st AAGL Global Congress.
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

LAS VEGAS – The number of hysterectomies in the United States appears to be on the decline, despite a 10% increase in minimally invasive cases.

Based on updated surveillance data, an estimated 479,229 hysterectomies were performed in the United States in 2009, of which 24% used a laparoscopic approach.

Patrice Wendling/IMNG Medical Media
Dr. Sarah Cohen

By comparison, there were 518,828 hysterectomies in 2005, 14% of which were laparoscopic: 64% were abdominal and 22% were vaginal (Obstet. Gynecol. 2009;114:1041-8).

Whether this represents a real decline in hysterectomies is unclear, Dr. Sarah Cohen of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston said at the 41st AAGL Global Congress.

The current analysis included oncologic cases, whereas the 2005 analysis looked only at gynecologic hysterectomies for benign disease.

On the other hand, both analyses are based on the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), which represents a 20% stratified random sample of discharges from all community hospitals in the United States. It is the largest national all-payer database of hospital discharges, but that’s where it stops.

"It’s possible that there are a number of nonsurgical options being offered to patients; however, I do think this also represents the increase in outpatient surgeries being offered, and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases aren’t able to account for those," she said. "Particularly, we may be underestimating laparoscopic and vaginal procedures that are being done in ambulatory settings."

Hysterectomy is the most common nonobstetric surgical procedure among women, with 600,000 typically cited as the annual number of procedures.

Dr. Cohen and her colleagues sought to verify this number using ICD-9 codes in the 2009 NIS – the most recent year available – to abstract information about any patient who underwent a hysterectomy during her hospitalization, including oncologic cases. Obstetric hysterectomies were excluded. The data were then weighted to give national estimates.

The mean patient age was 48 years, and the predominant indications were uterine fibroids (47%) and menstrual disorders (45%). Adnexal surgery occurred in 57% of cases.

Abdominal hysterectomy made up 58% of cases and vaginal hysterectomy 17% in the updated analysis, compared with 64% and 22% in the 2005 NIS, Dr. Cohen said.

In regression analysis, factors associated with laparoscopic surgery compared with abdominal surgery were younger age, white race, an indication of prolapse, menstrual disorder or endometriosis, living in an urban area, having a high income, having private insurance, and living in the Western United States.

When the regressions were repeated to compare laparoscopic with vaginal surgery, factors favoring the laparoscopic approach were age 40-49, black race, any nonprolapse indication, concomitant adnexal surgery, living in an urban area, having a high income, having private insurance, and living in the Northeastern United States.

Based on a systematic review of the literature, seven articles have been published in the past 5 years regarding hysterectomy surveillance, Dr. Cohen observed.

Although the NIS database may be incomplete, the bidirectional trends of falling overall numbers and rising laparoscopic procedures appear to be holding. An analysis of the 2003 NIS revealed 602,457 hysterectomies, with the abdominal route the most common at 66%, followed by the vaginal (22%) and laparoscopic (12%) routes (Obstet. Gynecol. 2007;110:1091-5).

Dr. Cohen said it’s critical to continue evaluating trends in hysterectomy performance, particularly with increasing outpatient minimally invasive procedures, and that he and his colleagues plan to incorporate state-level ambulatory surgery databases to capture outpatient procedures. They also will perform subgroup analyses of benign and oncologic cases, and look at factors associated with concomitant adnexal procedures.

Dr. Cohen reported no relevant financial disclosures.

LAS VEGAS – The number of hysterectomies in the United States appears to be on the decline, despite a 10% increase in minimally invasive cases.

Based on updated surveillance data, an estimated 479,229 hysterectomies were performed in the United States in 2009, of which 24% used a laparoscopic approach.

Patrice Wendling/IMNG Medical Media
Dr. Sarah Cohen

By comparison, there were 518,828 hysterectomies in 2005, 14% of which were laparoscopic: 64% were abdominal and 22% were vaginal (Obstet. Gynecol. 2009;114:1041-8).

Whether this represents a real decline in hysterectomies is unclear, Dr. Sarah Cohen of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston said at the 41st AAGL Global Congress.

The current analysis included oncologic cases, whereas the 2005 analysis looked only at gynecologic hysterectomies for benign disease.

On the other hand, both analyses are based on the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), which represents a 20% stratified random sample of discharges from all community hospitals in the United States. It is the largest national all-payer database of hospital discharges, but that’s where it stops.

"It’s possible that there are a number of nonsurgical options being offered to patients; however, I do think this also represents the increase in outpatient surgeries being offered, and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases aren’t able to account for those," she said. "Particularly, we may be underestimating laparoscopic and vaginal procedures that are being done in ambulatory settings."

Hysterectomy is the most common nonobstetric surgical procedure among women, with 600,000 typically cited as the annual number of procedures.

Dr. Cohen and her colleagues sought to verify this number using ICD-9 codes in the 2009 NIS – the most recent year available – to abstract information about any patient who underwent a hysterectomy during her hospitalization, including oncologic cases. Obstetric hysterectomies were excluded. The data were then weighted to give national estimates.

The mean patient age was 48 years, and the predominant indications were uterine fibroids (47%) and menstrual disorders (45%). Adnexal surgery occurred in 57% of cases.

Abdominal hysterectomy made up 58% of cases and vaginal hysterectomy 17% in the updated analysis, compared with 64% and 22% in the 2005 NIS, Dr. Cohen said.

In regression analysis, factors associated with laparoscopic surgery compared with abdominal surgery were younger age, white race, an indication of prolapse, menstrual disorder or endometriosis, living in an urban area, having a high income, having private insurance, and living in the Western United States.

When the regressions were repeated to compare laparoscopic with vaginal surgery, factors favoring the laparoscopic approach were age 40-49, black race, any nonprolapse indication, concomitant adnexal surgery, living in an urban area, having a high income, having private insurance, and living in the Northeastern United States.

Based on a systematic review of the literature, seven articles have been published in the past 5 years regarding hysterectomy surveillance, Dr. Cohen observed.

Although the NIS database may be incomplete, the bidirectional trends of falling overall numbers and rising laparoscopic procedures appear to be holding. An analysis of the 2003 NIS revealed 602,457 hysterectomies, with the abdominal route the most common at 66%, followed by the vaginal (22%) and laparoscopic (12%) routes (Obstet. Gynecol. 2007;110:1091-5).

Dr. Cohen said it’s critical to continue evaluating trends in hysterectomy performance, particularly with increasing outpatient minimally invasive procedures, and that he and his colleagues plan to incorporate state-level ambulatory surgery databases to capture outpatient procedures. They also will perform subgroup analyses of benign and oncologic cases, and look at factors associated with concomitant adnexal procedures.

Dr. Cohen reported no relevant financial disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Are Hysterectomies Really on the Decline?
Display Headline
Are Hysterectomies Really on the Decline?
Legacy Keywords
hysterectomy, Dr. Sara Cohen, laparoscopic hysterectomy, 41st AAGL Global Congress.
Legacy Keywords
hysterectomy, Dr. Sara Cohen, laparoscopic hysterectomy, 41st AAGL Global Congress.
Article Source

AT THE 41ST AAGL GLOBAL CONGRESS

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Major Finding: An estimated 479,229 hysterectomies were performed in 2009, compared with 518,828 in 2005.

Data Source: Data are from an analysis of the 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Disclosures: Dr. Cohen reported no relevant financial disclosures.

Kidneys Benefited From Everolimus After Liver Transplant

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 12:21
Display Headline
Kidneys Benefited From Everolimus After Liver Transplant

BOSTON – Everolimus given with a reduced dose of tacrolimus to liver transplant patients yielded similar rates of acute rejection, graft loss, and death, but better kidney function than standard-dose tacrolimus alone at 2 years in a randomized, open-label, multicenter, controlled trial.

These 2-year results confirm and build on the recently published results of the trial at 1 year (Am. J. Transpl. 2012;12:3008-20), lead investigator Dr. Faouzi Saliba of Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France, reported at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Since the first study was published 9 years ago documenting a cumulative incidence of chronic renal failure of 28% after 10 years of tacrolimus treatment after liver transplant (N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;349:931-40), another study has reported estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) of less than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (stage 3 chronic kidney failure) for 58% of liver transplant recipients after 5 years of treatment with tacrolimus (Liver Transpl. 2009:15:1083-91).

On the basis of the effectiveness of everolimus in reducing the dose of calcineurin inhibitor needed for immunosuppression without reducing efficacy in patients with de novo kidney transplantation (Am. J. Transpl. 2010;10:1401-13), Dr. Saliba and his coinvestigators conducted the current trial.

Following a 30-day run-in period in which liver transplant recipients received tacrolimus with or without mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone, the investigators randomized 719 patients to three arms: two arms with everolimus 3-8 ng/mL, tacrolimus reduced to 3-5 ng/mL, and prednisone, and a control arm with tacrolimus dosed to a standard 8-12 ng/mL plus prednisone. After 4 months, in one of the reduced-dose arms, tacrolimus was withdrawn and the everolimus dose was increased to 8-10 ng/mL (231 patients), whereas the dose of everolimus was kept constant in the other reduced-dose arm (245 patients) and the dose of tacrolimus was kept the same in the control arm (243 patients). Prednisone could be eliminated at 4 months in any arm. However, enrollment into the tacrolimus withdrawal arm was stopped at the time of conversion to everolimus alone because of a high rate of rejection episodes, and the trial’s protocol was amended to compare efficacy between only the reduced-dose and control arms.

By 2 years, the number of patients who completed the study was similar in both the reduced-dose and control arms (82% vs. 84%, respectively), and similar percentages in each group remained on the study medications at 2 years (58% vs. 68%, respectively).

In each group, recipients were mostly men (74%) and white (80%-86%), with a mean age of 54 years and mean donor age of 49 years. They had a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 19, and eGFRs of about 80 mL/min per 1.73 m2.

Mean levels of tacrolimus dropped from 10.5 ng/mL at randomization to 4 ng/mL at 2 years in the dose-reduction arm, compared with 10 ng/mL to 7 ng/mL in the control arm.

At 2 years in the intent-to-treat population, the groups had similar rates of the composite primary end point of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft failure, and death (10.5% in the dose-reduction arm and 12.5% in the control arm). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred at a significantly lower rate among dose-reduced patients (6%) than among control patients (13%). All of the episodes of acute rejection in the tacrolimus dose-reduced patients were borderline or mild based on the Banff rejection activity index. However, liver biopsies at 1 and 2 years were only part of the trial’s protocol for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. The decision to biopsy was otherwise left up to the physicians of each center.

At 1 year, there appeared to be less fibrosis in patients who received everolimus, Dr. Saliba said in response to a question from the audience. In about half of the 75 HCV-infected patients in the dose-reduction arm, liver biopsies showed less fibrosis of at least stage 1 than in patients with HCV infection in the other group. The investigators are now analyzing 2-year data, he said.

The dose-reduced group maintained significantly better eGFR than the control group, through the duration of the trial, finishing with levels of 66 vs. 78 mL/min per 1.73 m2.

Several types of adverse events with an incidence of at least 10% occurred more often in the dose-reduction arm than in the control arm, including leucopenia (13% vs. 5%), peripheral edema (20% vs. 13%), and hypercholesterolemia (11% vs. 4%).

Proteinuria of less than 0.5 g/24 hours occurred in 92%-93% of the patients; none of the patients had severe proteinuria of 3 g/24 hours or more.

 

 

One audience member noted that the most important patients to study in this clinical population are those on the borderline of renal failure with low eGFR and elevated creatinine, who would benefit most from improved renal function. Dr. Saliba said that at the time of randomization, the investigators looked at levels of eGFR in each group and over the course of the 2 years, more patients in the standard-dose tacrolimus arm had worsened renal function, whereas many in the dose-reduction arm had improved or at least stable renal function, and few had worsened function.

The study was sponsored by Novartis, which manufactures everolimus. Dr. Saliba reported financial ties to Novartis and Astellas Pharma (manufacturer of tacrolimus), as well as other companies that manufacture drugs used by liver transplant patients. Several other investigators reported financial ties to companies that manufacture antirejection drugs used in liver transplant patients, including Novartis. Three study investigators are employees of Novartis.

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
everolimus liver transplant, everolimus kidneys, kidneys liver transplant, Dr. Faouzi Saliba, liver disease meeting
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

BOSTON – Everolimus given with a reduced dose of tacrolimus to liver transplant patients yielded similar rates of acute rejection, graft loss, and death, but better kidney function than standard-dose tacrolimus alone at 2 years in a randomized, open-label, multicenter, controlled trial.

These 2-year results confirm and build on the recently published results of the trial at 1 year (Am. J. Transpl. 2012;12:3008-20), lead investigator Dr. Faouzi Saliba of Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France, reported at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Since the first study was published 9 years ago documenting a cumulative incidence of chronic renal failure of 28% after 10 years of tacrolimus treatment after liver transplant (N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;349:931-40), another study has reported estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) of less than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (stage 3 chronic kidney failure) for 58% of liver transplant recipients after 5 years of treatment with tacrolimus (Liver Transpl. 2009:15:1083-91).

On the basis of the effectiveness of everolimus in reducing the dose of calcineurin inhibitor needed for immunosuppression without reducing efficacy in patients with de novo kidney transplantation (Am. J. Transpl. 2010;10:1401-13), Dr. Saliba and his coinvestigators conducted the current trial.

Following a 30-day run-in period in which liver transplant recipients received tacrolimus with or without mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone, the investigators randomized 719 patients to three arms: two arms with everolimus 3-8 ng/mL, tacrolimus reduced to 3-5 ng/mL, and prednisone, and a control arm with tacrolimus dosed to a standard 8-12 ng/mL plus prednisone. After 4 months, in one of the reduced-dose arms, tacrolimus was withdrawn and the everolimus dose was increased to 8-10 ng/mL (231 patients), whereas the dose of everolimus was kept constant in the other reduced-dose arm (245 patients) and the dose of tacrolimus was kept the same in the control arm (243 patients). Prednisone could be eliminated at 4 months in any arm. However, enrollment into the tacrolimus withdrawal arm was stopped at the time of conversion to everolimus alone because of a high rate of rejection episodes, and the trial’s protocol was amended to compare efficacy between only the reduced-dose and control arms.

By 2 years, the number of patients who completed the study was similar in both the reduced-dose and control arms (82% vs. 84%, respectively), and similar percentages in each group remained on the study medications at 2 years (58% vs. 68%, respectively).

In each group, recipients were mostly men (74%) and white (80%-86%), with a mean age of 54 years and mean donor age of 49 years. They had a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 19, and eGFRs of about 80 mL/min per 1.73 m2.

Mean levels of tacrolimus dropped from 10.5 ng/mL at randomization to 4 ng/mL at 2 years in the dose-reduction arm, compared with 10 ng/mL to 7 ng/mL in the control arm.

At 2 years in the intent-to-treat population, the groups had similar rates of the composite primary end point of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft failure, and death (10.5% in the dose-reduction arm and 12.5% in the control arm). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred at a significantly lower rate among dose-reduced patients (6%) than among control patients (13%). All of the episodes of acute rejection in the tacrolimus dose-reduced patients were borderline or mild based on the Banff rejection activity index. However, liver biopsies at 1 and 2 years were only part of the trial’s protocol for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. The decision to biopsy was otherwise left up to the physicians of each center.

At 1 year, there appeared to be less fibrosis in patients who received everolimus, Dr. Saliba said in response to a question from the audience. In about half of the 75 HCV-infected patients in the dose-reduction arm, liver biopsies showed less fibrosis of at least stage 1 than in patients with HCV infection in the other group. The investigators are now analyzing 2-year data, he said.

The dose-reduced group maintained significantly better eGFR than the control group, through the duration of the trial, finishing with levels of 66 vs. 78 mL/min per 1.73 m2.

Several types of adverse events with an incidence of at least 10% occurred more often in the dose-reduction arm than in the control arm, including leucopenia (13% vs. 5%), peripheral edema (20% vs. 13%), and hypercholesterolemia (11% vs. 4%).

Proteinuria of less than 0.5 g/24 hours occurred in 92%-93% of the patients; none of the patients had severe proteinuria of 3 g/24 hours or more.

 

 

One audience member noted that the most important patients to study in this clinical population are those on the borderline of renal failure with low eGFR and elevated creatinine, who would benefit most from improved renal function. Dr. Saliba said that at the time of randomization, the investigators looked at levels of eGFR in each group and over the course of the 2 years, more patients in the standard-dose tacrolimus arm had worsened renal function, whereas many in the dose-reduction arm had improved or at least stable renal function, and few had worsened function.

The study was sponsored by Novartis, which manufactures everolimus. Dr. Saliba reported financial ties to Novartis and Astellas Pharma (manufacturer of tacrolimus), as well as other companies that manufacture drugs used by liver transplant patients. Several other investigators reported financial ties to companies that manufacture antirejection drugs used in liver transplant patients, including Novartis. Three study investigators are employees of Novartis.

BOSTON – Everolimus given with a reduced dose of tacrolimus to liver transplant patients yielded similar rates of acute rejection, graft loss, and death, but better kidney function than standard-dose tacrolimus alone at 2 years in a randomized, open-label, multicenter, controlled trial.

These 2-year results confirm and build on the recently published results of the trial at 1 year (Am. J. Transpl. 2012;12:3008-20), lead investigator Dr. Faouzi Saliba of Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France, reported at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Since the first study was published 9 years ago documenting a cumulative incidence of chronic renal failure of 28% after 10 years of tacrolimus treatment after liver transplant (N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;349:931-40), another study has reported estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) of less than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (stage 3 chronic kidney failure) for 58% of liver transplant recipients after 5 years of treatment with tacrolimus (Liver Transpl. 2009:15:1083-91).

On the basis of the effectiveness of everolimus in reducing the dose of calcineurin inhibitor needed for immunosuppression without reducing efficacy in patients with de novo kidney transplantation (Am. J. Transpl. 2010;10:1401-13), Dr. Saliba and his coinvestigators conducted the current trial.

Following a 30-day run-in period in which liver transplant recipients received tacrolimus with or without mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone, the investigators randomized 719 patients to three arms: two arms with everolimus 3-8 ng/mL, tacrolimus reduced to 3-5 ng/mL, and prednisone, and a control arm with tacrolimus dosed to a standard 8-12 ng/mL plus prednisone. After 4 months, in one of the reduced-dose arms, tacrolimus was withdrawn and the everolimus dose was increased to 8-10 ng/mL (231 patients), whereas the dose of everolimus was kept constant in the other reduced-dose arm (245 patients) and the dose of tacrolimus was kept the same in the control arm (243 patients). Prednisone could be eliminated at 4 months in any arm. However, enrollment into the tacrolimus withdrawal arm was stopped at the time of conversion to everolimus alone because of a high rate of rejection episodes, and the trial’s protocol was amended to compare efficacy between only the reduced-dose and control arms.

By 2 years, the number of patients who completed the study was similar in both the reduced-dose and control arms (82% vs. 84%, respectively), and similar percentages in each group remained on the study medications at 2 years (58% vs. 68%, respectively).

In each group, recipients were mostly men (74%) and white (80%-86%), with a mean age of 54 years and mean donor age of 49 years. They had a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 19, and eGFRs of about 80 mL/min per 1.73 m2.

Mean levels of tacrolimus dropped from 10.5 ng/mL at randomization to 4 ng/mL at 2 years in the dose-reduction arm, compared with 10 ng/mL to 7 ng/mL in the control arm.

At 2 years in the intent-to-treat population, the groups had similar rates of the composite primary end point of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft failure, and death (10.5% in the dose-reduction arm and 12.5% in the control arm). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred at a significantly lower rate among dose-reduced patients (6%) than among control patients (13%). All of the episodes of acute rejection in the tacrolimus dose-reduced patients were borderline or mild based on the Banff rejection activity index. However, liver biopsies at 1 and 2 years were only part of the trial’s protocol for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. The decision to biopsy was otherwise left up to the physicians of each center.

At 1 year, there appeared to be less fibrosis in patients who received everolimus, Dr. Saliba said in response to a question from the audience. In about half of the 75 HCV-infected patients in the dose-reduction arm, liver biopsies showed less fibrosis of at least stage 1 than in patients with HCV infection in the other group. The investigators are now analyzing 2-year data, he said.

The dose-reduced group maintained significantly better eGFR than the control group, through the duration of the trial, finishing with levels of 66 vs. 78 mL/min per 1.73 m2.

Several types of adverse events with an incidence of at least 10% occurred more often in the dose-reduction arm than in the control arm, including leucopenia (13% vs. 5%), peripheral edema (20% vs. 13%), and hypercholesterolemia (11% vs. 4%).

Proteinuria of less than 0.5 g/24 hours occurred in 92%-93% of the patients; none of the patients had severe proteinuria of 3 g/24 hours or more.

 

 

One audience member noted that the most important patients to study in this clinical population are those on the borderline of renal failure with low eGFR and elevated creatinine, who would benefit most from improved renal function. Dr. Saliba said that at the time of randomization, the investigators looked at levels of eGFR in each group and over the course of the 2 years, more patients in the standard-dose tacrolimus arm had worsened renal function, whereas many in the dose-reduction arm had improved or at least stable renal function, and few had worsened function.

The study was sponsored by Novartis, which manufactures everolimus. Dr. Saliba reported financial ties to Novartis and Astellas Pharma (manufacturer of tacrolimus), as well as other companies that manufacture drugs used by liver transplant patients. Several other investigators reported financial ties to companies that manufacture antirejection drugs used in liver transplant patients, including Novartis. Three study investigators are employees of Novartis.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Kidneys Benefited From Everolimus After Liver Transplant
Display Headline
Kidneys Benefited From Everolimus After Liver Transplant
Legacy Keywords
everolimus liver transplant, everolimus kidneys, kidneys liver transplant, Dr. Faouzi Saliba, liver disease meeting
Legacy Keywords
everolimus liver transplant, everolimus kidneys, kidneys liver transplant, Dr. Faouzi Saliba, liver disease meeting
Article Source

AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Major Finding: At 2 years in the intent-to-treat population, the groups had similar rates of the composite primary end point of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft failure, and death (10.5% in the dose-reduction arm and 12.5% in the control arm).

Data Source: This was a randomized, open-label, multicenter, controlled trial of 719 liver transplant recipients testing the addition of everolimus with or without the withdrawal of tacrolimus (4 months after transplant) or tacrolimus alone.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Novartis, which manufactures everolimus. Dr. Saliba reported financial ties to Novartis and Astellas Pharma (manufacturer of tacrolimus), as well as other companies that manufacture drugs used by liver transplant patients. Several other investigators reported financial ties to companies that manufacture antirejection drugs used in liver transplant patients, including Novartis. Three study investigators are employees of Novartis.

ADVANCE: TAVI Survival Remains High With CoreValve

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 12:20
Display Headline
ADVANCE: TAVI Survival Remains High With CoreValve

Survival rates remained high 1 year after implantation with the transcatheter aortic CoreValve in the postmarket ADVANCE study, initial results show.

At 1 year, overall survival was 82.1% and cardiovascular survival 88.2%. This compares with survival rates of 87.4% and 91.7% at 6 months and 95.5% and 96.6% at 30 days, principal investigator Dr. Axel Linke reported at Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2012.

"I think they’re outstanding," he said in an interview. "If you put it into the perspective of the PARTNER A and B cohorts [in the pivotal trial in the Sapien transcatheter valve system], our mortality rate is, in absolute values, 8 to 13% lower."

One explanation is that the 1,015-patient, postmarket ADVANCE study sought out centers experienced with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The 44 centers in Western Europe, Asia, and South America were required to have performed at least 40 TAVI procedures, with some German centers having done as many as 500, to be certified by a TAVI proctor and to have a heart team in place.

"Clearly, our centers were out of the learning curve," remarked Dr. Linke of the University of Leipzig (Germany) Heart Center.

By comparison, some centers in the PARTNER trial of the Edwards Lifesciences Sapien valve contributed just six or seven patients and were selected based on their experience with general cardiologic intervention, he observed.

The 1-year survival rates in ADVANCE also surpass those from early registries, notably the French Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards Registry, where the initial experience with TAVI was associated with interventional mistakes, which were linked to early mortality, Dr. Linke said.

The CoreValve System has been implanted in more than 30,000 patients since its approval in the European Union in 2007, but is limited to investigational use in the United States and Japan.

No details were presented regarding mortality in various subgroups or complications such as stroke, paravalvular leaks or left bundle branch block (LBBB). A recent analysis raised concerns about LBBB, showing that one-third of 202 consecutive patients with no prior conduction disturbances developed new-onset LBBB after TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve (Sapien or Sapien XT). Although it resolved in 37.7% by hospital discharge and 57.3% at 6- to 12-month follow-up, patients with persistent LBBB had a significantly higher incidence of syncope and complete atrioventricular block requiring a permanent pacemaker (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012;60:1743-52 [doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.035]).

Dr. Linke said they will look at LBBB in more detailed analyses expected from ADVANCE in the coming weeks, but that there’s been no evidence of a problem with LBBB in earlier follow-up in ADVANCE or from other CoreValve users.

"Survival curves are absolutely identical up to the 6-month follow-up, so there’s no reason to believe they should be worse afterwards, although I can’t be exactly sure right now," he said, adding that in the publication, survival curves from patients with and without new-onset LBBB "started to diverge very early."

Quality of life data from ADVANCE, reported in a separate poster session at the meeting, showed significant benefits with the CoreValve, even among higher-risk patients.

Scores on the European Quality of Life–5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), which ranges from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health), improved from 0.62 at baseline to 0.72 at 1 month, where it remained at 6 months, both highly significant differences from baseline.

On the Short Form Health Survey–12 (SF-12), scores at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months were 32.8, 39, and 39.7 for the physical component and 46.2, 48.5, and 50 for the mental component.

"Basically, whatever is gained, is gained very early from the baseline to the 1-month follow-up in the majority of the cases," said Dr. Linke.

The 322 higher-risk patients entering the study with a logistic EuroSCORE of more than 20 had significantly worse baseline health-related quality of life than did those with a EuroSCORE of 10 or less, but experienced significant improvements after TAVI on the EQ-5D at 1 month and on both components of the SF-12 at 6 months, all significant changes.

The access route used during TAVI had no impact on quality of life improvement at 6 months.

Dr. Linke reported serving as an adviser or consultant for Medtronic, which sponsored the study.

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
ADVANCE study, transcatheter aortic CoreValve, TAVI survival, Dr. Axel Linke, Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2012
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

Survival rates remained high 1 year after implantation with the transcatheter aortic CoreValve in the postmarket ADVANCE study, initial results show.

At 1 year, overall survival was 82.1% and cardiovascular survival 88.2%. This compares with survival rates of 87.4% and 91.7% at 6 months and 95.5% and 96.6% at 30 days, principal investigator Dr. Axel Linke reported at Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2012.

"I think they’re outstanding," he said in an interview. "If you put it into the perspective of the PARTNER A and B cohorts [in the pivotal trial in the Sapien transcatheter valve system], our mortality rate is, in absolute values, 8 to 13% lower."

One explanation is that the 1,015-patient, postmarket ADVANCE study sought out centers experienced with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The 44 centers in Western Europe, Asia, and South America were required to have performed at least 40 TAVI procedures, with some German centers having done as many as 500, to be certified by a TAVI proctor and to have a heart team in place.

"Clearly, our centers were out of the learning curve," remarked Dr. Linke of the University of Leipzig (Germany) Heart Center.

By comparison, some centers in the PARTNER trial of the Edwards Lifesciences Sapien valve contributed just six or seven patients and were selected based on their experience with general cardiologic intervention, he observed.

The 1-year survival rates in ADVANCE also surpass those from early registries, notably the French Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards Registry, where the initial experience with TAVI was associated with interventional mistakes, which were linked to early mortality, Dr. Linke said.

The CoreValve System has been implanted in more than 30,000 patients since its approval in the European Union in 2007, but is limited to investigational use in the United States and Japan.

No details were presented regarding mortality in various subgroups or complications such as stroke, paravalvular leaks or left bundle branch block (LBBB). A recent analysis raised concerns about LBBB, showing that one-third of 202 consecutive patients with no prior conduction disturbances developed new-onset LBBB after TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve (Sapien or Sapien XT). Although it resolved in 37.7% by hospital discharge and 57.3% at 6- to 12-month follow-up, patients with persistent LBBB had a significantly higher incidence of syncope and complete atrioventricular block requiring a permanent pacemaker (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012;60:1743-52 [doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.035]).

Dr. Linke said they will look at LBBB in more detailed analyses expected from ADVANCE in the coming weeks, but that there’s been no evidence of a problem with LBBB in earlier follow-up in ADVANCE or from other CoreValve users.

"Survival curves are absolutely identical up to the 6-month follow-up, so there’s no reason to believe they should be worse afterwards, although I can’t be exactly sure right now," he said, adding that in the publication, survival curves from patients with and without new-onset LBBB "started to diverge very early."

Quality of life data from ADVANCE, reported in a separate poster session at the meeting, showed significant benefits with the CoreValve, even among higher-risk patients.

Scores on the European Quality of Life–5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), which ranges from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health), improved from 0.62 at baseline to 0.72 at 1 month, where it remained at 6 months, both highly significant differences from baseline.

On the Short Form Health Survey–12 (SF-12), scores at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months were 32.8, 39, and 39.7 for the physical component and 46.2, 48.5, and 50 for the mental component.

"Basically, whatever is gained, is gained very early from the baseline to the 1-month follow-up in the majority of the cases," said Dr. Linke.

The 322 higher-risk patients entering the study with a logistic EuroSCORE of more than 20 had significantly worse baseline health-related quality of life than did those with a EuroSCORE of 10 or less, but experienced significant improvements after TAVI on the EQ-5D at 1 month and on both components of the SF-12 at 6 months, all significant changes.

The access route used during TAVI had no impact on quality of life improvement at 6 months.

Dr. Linke reported serving as an adviser or consultant for Medtronic, which sponsored the study.

Survival rates remained high 1 year after implantation with the transcatheter aortic CoreValve in the postmarket ADVANCE study, initial results show.

At 1 year, overall survival was 82.1% and cardiovascular survival 88.2%. This compares with survival rates of 87.4% and 91.7% at 6 months and 95.5% and 96.6% at 30 days, principal investigator Dr. Axel Linke reported at Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2012.

"I think they’re outstanding," he said in an interview. "If you put it into the perspective of the PARTNER A and B cohorts [in the pivotal trial in the Sapien transcatheter valve system], our mortality rate is, in absolute values, 8 to 13% lower."

One explanation is that the 1,015-patient, postmarket ADVANCE study sought out centers experienced with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The 44 centers in Western Europe, Asia, and South America were required to have performed at least 40 TAVI procedures, with some German centers having done as many as 500, to be certified by a TAVI proctor and to have a heart team in place.

"Clearly, our centers were out of the learning curve," remarked Dr. Linke of the University of Leipzig (Germany) Heart Center.

By comparison, some centers in the PARTNER trial of the Edwards Lifesciences Sapien valve contributed just six or seven patients and were selected based on their experience with general cardiologic intervention, he observed.

The 1-year survival rates in ADVANCE also surpass those from early registries, notably the French Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards Registry, where the initial experience with TAVI was associated with interventional mistakes, which were linked to early mortality, Dr. Linke said.

The CoreValve System has been implanted in more than 30,000 patients since its approval in the European Union in 2007, but is limited to investigational use in the United States and Japan.

No details were presented regarding mortality in various subgroups or complications such as stroke, paravalvular leaks or left bundle branch block (LBBB). A recent analysis raised concerns about LBBB, showing that one-third of 202 consecutive patients with no prior conduction disturbances developed new-onset LBBB after TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve (Sapien or Sapien XT). Although it resolved in 37.7% by hospital discharge and 57.3% at 6- to 12-month follow-up, patients with persistent LBBB had a significantly higher incidence of syncope and complete atrioventricular block requiring a permanent pacemaker (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012;60:1743-52 [doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.035]).

Dr. Linke said they will look at LBBB in more detailed analyses expected from ADVANCE in the coming weeks, but that there’s been no evidence of a problem with LBBB in earlier follow-up in ADVANCE or from other CoreValve users.

"Survival curves are absolutely identical up to the 6-month follow-up, so there’s no reason to believe they should be worse afterwards, although I can’t be exactly sure right now," he said, adding that in the publication, survival curves from patients with and without new-onset LBBB "started to diverge very early."

Quality of life data from ADVANCE, reported in a separate poster session at the meeting, showed significant benefits with the CoreValve, even among higher-risk patients.

Scores on the European Quality of Life–5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), which ranges from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health), improved from 0.62 at baseline to 0.72 at 1 month, where it remained at 6 months, both highly significant differences from baseline.

On the Short Form Health Survey–12 (SF-12), scores at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months were 32.8, 39, and 39.7 for the physical component and 46.2, 48.5, and 50 for the mental component.

"Basically, whatever is gained, is gained very early from the baseline to the 1-month follow-up in the majority of the cases," said Dr. Linke.

The 322 higher-risk patients entering the study with a logistic EuroSCORE of more than 20 had significantly worse baseline health-related quality of life than did those with a EuroSCORE of 10 or less, but experienced significant improvements after TAVI on the EQ-5D at 1 month and on both components of the SF-12 at 6 months, all significant changes.

The access route used during TAVI had no impact on quality of life improvement at 6 months.

Dr. Linke reported serving as an adviser or consultant for Medtronic, which sponsored the study.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
ADVANCE: TAVI Survival Remains High With CoreValve
Display Headline
ADVANCE: TAVI Survival Remains High With CoreValve
Legacy Keywords
ADVANCE study, transcatheter aortic CoreValve, TAVI survival, Dr. Axel Linke, Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2012
Legacy Keywords
ADVANCE study, transcatheter aortic CoreValve, TAVI survival, Dr. Axel Linke, Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2012
Sections
Article Source

FROM TRANSCATHETER CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPEUTICS 2012

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Major Finding: At 1 year, overall survival was 82.1% and cardiovascular survival 88.2%.

Data Source: International, postmarket phase IV study of 1,015 patients with severe aortic stenosis implanted with the transcatheter CoreValve.

Disclosures: Dr. Linke reported serving as an advisor or consultant for Medtronic, which sponsored the study.

Acetaminophen-Linked Liver Failure Risk Heightened in Bariatric Surgery Patients

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 12:20
Display Headline
Acetaminophen-Linked Liver Failure Risk Heightened in Bariatric Surgery Patients

BOSTON – Prior bariatric surgery appears to be an independent risk factor for acetaminophen-related acute liver failure or injury, investigators reported at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

A retrospective study of patients with acute liver failure (ALF) showed that 9 of 54 (17%) patients with ALF attributed to acetaminophen (APAP-ALF) had previously had bariatric surgery, compared with none of 47 patients with ALF from other causes, said Dr. Edward W. Holt, a researcher at the California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco.

Dr. Edward W. Holt

Although previous studies have shown associations between bariatric surgery and between alcohol abuse and APAP-ALF, they found that there were no significant differences in rates of suicidal ideation, depression, or alcohol abuse between patients who underwent bariatric surgery and those who had not, suggesting that bariatric surgery itself was a risk factor, Dr. Holt said.

"We feel that the implications of these findings are important," he said. "If validated in a larger cohort, our novel finding may identify a new group of patients at higher risk for APAP-ALF. If validated, additional warnings for patients with prior bariatric surgery may be warranted, similar to those currently in place for patients who consume three or more alcoholic drinks daily."

Possible explanations for the association include higher peak serum concentrations of ethanol after a challenge in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery, as well as higher rates of suicidal behaviors among these patients, compared with controls.

The investigators retrospectively reviewed data from their center on a prospectively identified cohort of 101 patients with acute liver failure from acetaminophen and other causes, including drug-induced, infections, lymphoma, ischemia, and heatstroke. Of the 54 patients with APAP-ALF, 8 had undergone roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and one had a duodenal switch procedure, at a mean of nearly 6 years before diagnosis of ALF.

Among the patients in the APAP-ALF group, the prevalence of bariatric surgery was 25.3-fold higher than the estimated prevalence in the general population (16.7% vs. 0.5%; estimate based on published literature and national hospital discharge data).

The patients with APAP-ALF and ALF from other causes were similar in age, but there were more women (P = .02) and whites (P less than .0001) in the APAP-ALF group, and patients in this group had significantly fewer deaths (P less than .0006) and transplants (P less than .0001).

When the researchers looked at possible risk factors for ALF, they found that patients in the ALF/other group had significantly lower frequencies of depression (P less than .001), alcohol abuse (P = .01), and acetaminophen-containing combination analgesics (P less than .0001). But when they compared patients with or without bariatric surgery, there were no significant differences in any of the variables mentioned above.

Dr. Holt noted that the study was limited by its single-center design, inability to test proposed mechanisms for the increased risk seen in patients who had undergone bariatric surgery (such as changes in glutathione levels), and the inability to perform a logistic regression analysis, as none of the patients with non-APAP ALF had undergone surgery.

In the question-and-response portion following his presentation, Dr. Holt was asked whether liver biopsies had been performed to see if patients had background steatohepatitis or fibrosis that might account for the results, and whether body mass index data were available.

He noted that the patients came primarily from his institution’s wide referral base, and they therefore did not have all the demographic or clinical information about each patient that they would have liked.

The study was internally funded. Dr. Holt reported no relevant financial disclosures.

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
prior bariatric surgery, acute liver failure, acetaminophen-related liver failure, APAP-ALF, bariatric surgery liver failure
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

BOSTON – Prior bariatric surgery appears to be an independent risk factor for acetaminophen-related acute liver failure or injury, investigators reported at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

A retrospective study of patients with acute liver failure (ALF) showed that 9 of 54 (17%) patients with ALF attributed to acetaminophen (APAP-ALF) had previously had bariatric surgery, compared with none of 47 patients with ALF from other causes, said Dr. Edward W. Holt, a researcher at the California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco.

Dr. Edward W. Holt

Although previous studies have shown associations between bariatric surgery and between alcohol abuse and APAP-ALF, they found that there were no significant differences in rates of suicidal ideation, depression, or alcohol abuse between patients who underwent bariatric surgery and those who had not, suggesting that bariatric surgery itself was a risk factor, Dr. Holt said.

"We feel that the implications of these findings are important," he said. "If validated in a larger cohort, our novel finding may identify a new group of patients at higher risk for APAP-ALF. If validated, additional warnings for patients with prior bariatric surgery may be warranted, similar to those currently in place for patients who consume three or more alcoholic drinks daily."

Possible explanations for the association include higher peak serum concentrations of ethanol after a challenge in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery, as well as higher rates of suicidal behaviors among these patients, compared with controls.

The investigators retrospectively reviewed data from their center on a prospectively identified cohort of 101 patients with acute liver failure from acetaminophen and other causes, including drug-induced, infections, lymphoma, ischemia, and heatstroke. Of the 54 patients with APAP-ALF, 8 had undergone roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and one had a duodenal switch procedure, at a mean of nearly 6 years before diagnosis of ALF.

Among the patients in the APAP-ALF group, the prevalence of bariatric surgery was 25.3-fold higher than the estimated prevalence in the general population (16.7% vs. 0.5%; estimate based on published literature and national hospital discharge data).

The patients with APAP-ALF and ALF from other causes were similar in age, but there were more women (P = .02) and whites (P less than .0001) in the APAP-ALF group, and patients in this group had significantly fewer deaths (P less than .0006) and transplants (P less than .0001).

When the researchers looked at possible risk factors for ALF, they found that patients in the ALF/other group had significantly lower frequencies of depression (P less than .001), alcohol abuse (P = .01), and acetaminophen-containing combination analgesics (P less than .0001). But when they compared patients with or without bariatric surgery, there were no significant differences in any of the variables mentioned above.

Dr. Holt noted that the study was limited by its single-center design, inability to test proposed mechanisms for the increased risk seen in patients who had undergone bariatric surgery (such as changes in glutathione levels), and the inability to perform a logistic regression analysis, as none of the patients with non-APAP ALF had undergone surgery.

In the question-and-response portion following his presentation, Dr. Holt was asked whether liver biopsies had been performed to see if patients had background steatohepatitis or fibrosis that might account for the results, and whether body mass index data were available.

He noted that the patients came primarily from his institution’s wide referral base, and they therefore did not have all the demographic or clinical information about each patient that they would have liked.

The study was internally funded. Dr. Holt reported no relevant financial disclosures.

BOSTON – Prior bariatric surgery appears to be an independent risk factor for acetaminophen-related acute liver failure or injury, investigators reported at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

A retrospective study of patients with acute liver failure (ALF) showed that 9 of 54 (17%) patients with ALF attributed to acetaminophen (APAP-ALF) had previously had bariatric surgery, compared with none of 47 patients with ALF from other causes, said Dr. Edward W. Holt, a researcher at the California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco.

Dr. Edward W. Holt

Although previous studies have shown associations between bariatric surgery and between alcohol abuse and APAP-ALF, they found that there were no significant differences in rates of suicidal ideation, depression, or alcohol abuse between patients who underwent bariatric surgery and those who had not, suggesting that bariatric surgery itself was a risk factor, Dr. Holt said.

"We feel that the implications of these findings are important," he said. "If validated in a larger cohort, our novel finding may identify a new group of patients at higher risk for APAP-ALF. If validated, additional warnings for patients with prior bariatric surgery may be warranted, similar to those currently in place for patients who consume three or more alcoholic drinks daily."

Possible explanations for the association include higher peak serum concentrations of ethanol after a challenge in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery, as well as higher rates of suicidal behaviors among these patients, compared with controls.

The investigators retrospectively reviewed data from their center on a prospectively identified cohort of 101 patients with acute liver failure from acetaminophen and other causes, including drug-induced, infections, lymphoma, ischemia, and heatstroke. Of the 54 patients with APAP-ALF, 8 had undergone roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and one had a duodenal switch procedure, at a mean of nearly 6 years before diagnosis of ALF.

Among the patients in the APAP-ALF group, the prevalence of bariatric surgery was 25.3-fold higher than the estimated prevalence in the general population (16.7% vs. 0.5%; estimate based on published literature and national hospital discharge data).

The patients with APAP-ALF and ALF from other causes were similar in age, but there were more women (P = .02) and whites (P less than .0001) in the APAP-ALF group, and patients in this group had significantly fewer deaths (P less than .0006) and transplants (P less than .0001).

When the researchers looked at possible risk factors for ALF, they found that patients in the ALF/other group had significantly lower frequencies of depression (P less than .001), alcohol abuse (P = .01), and acetaminophen-containing combination analgesics (P less than .0001). But when they compared patients with or without bariatric surgery, there were no significant differences in any of the variables mentioned above.

Dr. Holt noted that the study was limited by its single-center design, inability to test proposed mechanisms for the increased risk seen in patients who had undergone bariatric surgery (such as changes in glutathione levels), and the inability to perform a logistic regression analysis, as none of the patients with non-APAP ALF had undergone surgery.

In the question-and-response portion following his presentation, Dr. Holt was asked whether liver biopsies had been performed to see if patients had background steatohepatitis or fibrosis that might account for the results, and whether body mass index data were available.

He noted that the patients came primarily from his institution’s wide referral base, and they therefore did not have all the demographic or clinical information about each patient that they would have liked.

The study was internally funded. Dr. Holt reported no relevant financial disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Acetaminophen-Linked Liver Failure Risk Heightened in Bariatric Surgery Patients
Display Headline
Acetaminophen-Linked Liver Failure Risk Heightened in Bariatric Surgery Patients
Legacy Keywords
prior bariatric surgery, acute liver failure, acetaminophen-related liver failure, APAP-ALF, bariatric surgery liver failure
Legacy Keywords
prior bariatric surgery, acute liver failure, acetaminophen-related liver failure, APAP-ALF, bariatric surgery liver failure
Sections
Article Source

AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Major Finding: Among patients with acute liver failure from acetaminophen, the prevalence of prior bariatric surgery was 25-fold higher than in the general population, suggesting bariatric surgery may be a risk factor for liver failure.

Data Source: This was a retrospective cohort study of 101 patients with liver failure from various causes.

Disclosures: The study was internally funded. Dr. Holt reported no relevant financial disclosures.

Serum Creatinine Elevations: Red Flag After Noncardiac Surgery

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 08:20
Display Headline
Serum Creatinine Elevations: Red Flag After Noncardiac Surgery

SAN DIEGO – Patients who have minor elevations in serum creatinine after noncardiac surgery may be more likely to require a longer postoperative hospital stay and face a twofold increased risk of dying during that stay, preliminary data from a German study have shown.

"This is a big problem, because minor kidney dysfunction may not be noticed postoperatively," Dr. Felix Kork said in an interview during a poster session at Kidney Week 2012 "About 2% of people in general have a small increase in serum creatinine. They are at a greater risk of dying and staying longer in the hospital. Therapeutic options are needed to prevent this minor kidney dysfunction perioperatively."

Dr. Felix Kork

Dr. Kork of the department of anesthesiology and intensive care medicine at Charité Hospital in Berlin and his associates retrospectively studied the records of 27,616 patients who underwent noncardiac surgery at Charité between 2006 and 2012. The researchers evaluated perioperative renal function by serum creatinine level.

After doing a multivariate analysis that adjusted for age, comorbidities, renal function, high-risk surgery, and postoperative admission to the ICU, the researchers observed that minor elevations in serum creatinine (defined as a range from 0.25 to 0.50 mg/dL) were independently associated with a prolonged hospital length of stay (HR for early discharge, 0.81) and a twofold increased risk of death during the postoperative hospital stay (OR, 1.99) compared with patients without an increase in serum creatinine level. Both findings were statistically significant.

"While adjusting for covariates, we also found that having received radio contrast agent before surgery is independently associated with a greater risk of mortality and hospital length of stay, whether there was kidney dysfunction after the radio contrast agent or not," Dr. Kork added. "We’re still looking into that [association]. It could be that those patients were sicker."

He acknowledged that the study’s retrospective design is a limitation. Because of this "we can only show the association between the serum creatinine increase and the outcome," he said. "We are planning a prospective study right now." Dr. Kork explained that the current study has been submitted for publication in an undisclosed journal, which will contain more detail about these findings.

Dr. Kork said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
serum creatinine, postsurgery, Dr. Felix Kork, Kidney Week 2012, kidney disease
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

SAN DIEGO – Patients who have minor elevations in serum creatinine after noncardiac surgery may be more likely to require a longer postoperative hospital stay and face a twofold increased risk of dying during that stay, preliminary data from a German study have shown.

"This is a big problem, because minor kidney dysfunction may not be noticed postoperatively," Dr. Felix Kork said in an interview during a poster session at Kidney Week 2012 "About 2% of people in general have a small increase in serum creatinine. They are at a greater risk of dying and staying longer in the hospital. Therapeutic options are needed to prevent this minor kidney dysfunction perioperatively."

Dr. Felix Kork

Dr. Kork of the department of anesthesiology and intensive care medicine at Charité Hospital in Berlin and his associates retrospectively studied the records of 27,616 patients who underwent noncardiac surgery at Charité between 2006 and 2012. The researchers evaluated perioperative renal function by serum creatinine level.

After doing a multivariate analysis that adjusted for age, comorbidities, renal function, high-risk surgery, and postoperative admission to the ICU, the researchers observed that minor elevations in serum creatinine (defined as a range from 0.25 to 0.50 mg/dL) were independently associated with a prolonged hospital length of stay (HR for early discharge, 0.81) and a twofold increased risk of death during the postoperative hospital stay (OR, 1.99) compared with patients without an increase in serum creatinine level. Both findings were statistically significant.

"While adjusting for covariates, we also found that having received radio contrast agent before surgery is independently associated with a greater risk of mortality and hospital length of stay, whether there was kidney dysfunction after the radio contrast agent or not," Dr. Kork added. "We’re still looking into that [association]. It could be that those patients were sicker."

He acknowledged that the study’s retrospective design is a limitation. Because of this "we can only show the association between the serum creatinine increase and the outcome," he said. "We are planning a prospective study right now." Dr. Kork explained that the current study has been submitted for publication in an undisclosed journal, which will contain more detail about these findings.

Dr. Kork said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.

SAN DIEGO – Patients who have minor elevations in serum creatinine after noncardiac surgery may be more likely to require a longer postoperative hospital stay and face a twofold increased risk of dying during that stay, preliminary data from a German study have shown.

"This is a big problem, because minor kidney dysfunction may not be noticed postoperatively," Dr. Felix Kork said in an interview during a poster session at Kidney Week 2012 "About 2% of people in general have a small increase in serum creatinine. They are at a greater risk of dying and staying longer in the hospital. Therapeutic options are needed to prevent this minor kidney dysfunction perioperatively."

Dr. Felix Kork

Dr. Kork of the department of anesthesiology and intensive care medicine at Charité Hospital in Berlin and his associates retrospectively studied the records of 27,616 patients who underwent noncardiac surgery at Charité between 2006 and 2012. The researchers evaluated perioperative renal function by serum creatinine level.

After doing a multivariate analysis that adjusted for age, comorbidities, renal function, high-risk surgery, and postoperative admission to the ICU, the researchers observed that minor elevations in serum creatinine (defined as a range from 0.25 to 0.50 mg/dL) were independently associated with a prolonged hospital length of stay (HR for early discharge, 0.81) and a twofold increased risk of death during the postoperative hospital stay (OR, 1.99) compared with patients without an increase in serum creatinine level. Both findings were statistically significant.

"While adjusting for covariates, we also found that having received radio contrast agent before surgery is independently associated with a greater risk of mortality and hospital length of stay, whether there was kidney dysfunction after the radio contrast agent or not," Dr. Kork added. "We’re still looking into that [association]. It could be that those patients were sicker."

He acknowledged that the study’s retrospective design is a limitation. Because of this "we can only show the association between the serum creatinine increase and the outcome," he said. "We are planning a prospective study right now." Dr. Kork explained that the current study has been submitted for publication in an undisclosed journal, which will contain more detail about these findings.

Dr. Kork said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Serum Creatinine Elevations: Red Flag After Noncardiac Surgery
Display Headline
Serum Creatinine Elevations: Red Flag After Noncardiac Surgery
Legacy Keywords
serum creatinine, postsurgery, Dr. Felix Kork, Kidney Week 2012, kidney disease
Legacy Keywords
serum creatinine, postsurgery, Dr. Felix Kork, Kidney Week 2012, kidney disease
Article Source

AT KIDNEY WEEK 2012

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Major Finding: Patients who experienced minor elevations in serum creatinine after noncardiac surgery had an increased risk of a prolonged hospital length of stay (HR for early discharge, 0.81; P less than .01) and a twofold increased risk of death during the postoperative hospital stay (OR, 1.99; P less than .01).

Data Source: A study of 27,616 patients who underwent noncardiac surgery at Charité Hospital in Berlin between 2006 and 2012.

Disclosures: Dr. Kork said he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.

Informed Consent: Information Transfer or Communication?

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 08:20
Display Headline
Informed Consent: Information Transfer or Communication?

Obtaining informed consent for surgery is one of the most common tasks surgeons perform. Ensuring that a patient has the capacity to make a decision and then explaining the indications, risks, and alternatives to the surgery is something that surgeons do hundreds of times a year. Although the process is routine, it reflects the importance of respecting patients’ autonomy in making informed decisions about their health care. Informed consent has been an accepted practice in American surgery for decades, but questions about the process can arise and elicit varied responses among surgeons.

Recently, an experienced colleague (Dr. S) called me to discuss a case that had been troubling him. A 68-year-old man had been referred to him for a surgical opinion after experiencing recurrent episodes of diverticulitis. He was a former insurance executive, now retired. He was married, but came without his wife to the appointment with Dr. S.

After completing the history and physical examination and reviewing the imaging, Dr. S recommended an elective sigmoid colon resection. He explained to the patient what was involved in the surgery and the expected recovery. According to Dr. S, the patient then stated, "I understand. When can we schedule it?" At this point, Dr. S stated that a few more things needed to be reviewed and began to discuss the potential risks of the surgery. The patient stopped him abruptly, saying that he knew that there were risks, but he preferred not to hear about them.

When Dr. S responded that it is always good to know the risks when deciding to have surgery, the patient stated, "Look, I trust my primary care doctor who sent me to see you. You seem like a good surgeon, and I have confidence in you. I don’t want to hear about the risks, because my hearing them won’t make them not happen and will only make me worry. I’ll sign anything that you want, but I don’t want you to tell me the risks."

Dr. S felt torn. He had always felt that the consent process was primarily about informing the patient of what could happen. Reviewing the potential risks would help the patient to become better informed in making the decision to have surgery. Dr. S felt that his patient’s desire not to be informed had short-circuited the process, and it now seemed incomplete.

Dr. S offered to call the patient’s wife to discuss the risks with her, but the patient said that would not be necessary since he was making his own decisions. Although there was no hostility in the patient’s remarks, Dr. S felt that he had pushed hard enough, so he obtained a signature on the consent form and documented in his note that he had offered to inform the patient of the risks but that the patient had refused to hear them.

In the 3 weeks between this office visit and the surgery, Dr. S related the case to a number of his surgical colleagues and received diametrically opposing views. One group of surgeons stated that as the surgeon, Dr. S had an ethical responsibility to ensure that his patient knew of the risks of the procedure. They felt strongly that unless Dr. S had reviewed these risks with the patient, the consent was not valid because "it was not truly informed." Another group of surgeons felt that the ethical responsibility was not to inform the patient, but rather to provide the opportunity for the patient to be informed. This second group felt that pushing the patient to hear information that he did not want to hear would actually be violating his autonomous choice not to be informed.

These opposing views of what to do in this case help to clarify what I believe is one of the central points of confusion about the informed consent process as it is currently used. Surgeons and patients alike often believe that the information transfer – that is, describing the risks of the surgery – is the central goal of the process. However, many studies have shown that patients do not actually remember much of what they are told by their surgeons. Specifically, few risks are remembered even on the same day that the surgeon has reviewed them and the consent form is signed. These data clearly suggest to me that the more important aspect of the informed consent process is the communication between the surgeon and the patient.

Communication suggests something more than providing a lecture to a patient. It suggests the importance of listening and responding to requests for more or less information. Given that the requirement for informed consent prior to surgery is grounded on the principle of respecting a patient’s autonomy, it seems clear that when a patient does not want to hear the information that a surgeon wants to convey, the surgeon must respect the patient’s choice not to be informed.

 

 

Although Dr. S had felt that something was missing in the consent process since it did not include "the usual discussion of risks," the patient’s choices had been respected and Dr. S had fully discharged his responsibilities in obtaining the patient’s informed consent.

Dr. Angelos is an ACS Fellow, the Linda Kohler Anderson Professor of Surgery and Surgical Ethics, chief, endocrine surgery, and associate director of the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics at the University of Chicago.

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Legacy Keywords
informed consent surgery, Dr. Peter Angelos
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Obtaining informed consent for surgery is one of the most common tasks surgeons perform. Ensuring that a patient has the capacity to make a decision and then explaining the indications, risks, and alternatives to the surgery is something that surgeons do hundreds of times a year. Although the process is routine, it reflects the importance of respecting patients’ autonomy in making informed decisions about their health care. Informed consent has been an accepted practice in American surgery for decades, but questions about the process can arise and elicit varied responses among surgeons.

Recently, an experienced colleague (Dr. S) called me to discuss a case that had been troubling him. A 68-year-old man had been referred to him for a surgical opinion after experiencing recurrent episodes of diverticulitis. He was a former insurance executive, now retired. He was married, but came without his wife to the appointment with Dr. S.

After completing the history and physical examination and reviewing the imaging, Dr. S recommended an elective sigmoid colon resection. He explained to the patient what was involved in the surgery and the expected recovery. According to Dr. S, the patient then stated, "I understand. When can we schedule it?" At this point, Dr. S stated that a few more things needed to be reviewed and began to discuss the potential risks of the surgery. The patient stopped him abruptly, saying that he knew that there were risks, but he preferred not to hear about them.

When Dr. S responded that it is always good to know the risks when deciding to have surgery, the patient stated, "Look, I trust my primary care doctor who sent me to see you. You seem like a good surgeon, and I have confidence in you. I don’t want to hear about the risks, because my hearing them won’t make them not happen and will only make me worry. I’ll sign anything that you want, but I don’t want you to tell me the risks."

Dr. S felt torn. He had always felt that the consent process was primarily about informing the patient of what could happen. Reviewing the potential risks would help the patient to become better informed in making the decision to have surgery. Dr. S felt that his patient’s desire not to be informed had short-circuited the process, and it now seemed incomplete.

Dr. S offered to call the patient’s wife to discuss the risks with her, but the patient said that would not be necessary since he was making his own decisions. Although there was no hostility in the patient’s remarks, Dr. S felt that he had pushed hard enough, so he obtained a signature on the consent form and documented in his note that he had offered to inform the patient of the risks but that the patient had refused to hear them.

In the 3 weeks between this office visit and the surgery, Dr. S related the case to a number of his surgical colleagues and received diametrically opposing views. One group of surgeons stated that as the surgeon, Dr. S had an ethical responsibility to ensure that his patient knew of the risks of the procedure. They felt strongly that unless Dr. S had reviewed these risks with the patient, the consent was not valid because "it was not truly informed." Another group of surgeons felt that the ethical responsibility was not to inform the patient, but rather to provide the opportunity for the patient to be informed. This second group felt that pushing the patient to hear information that he did not want to hear would actually be violating his autonomous choice not to be informed.

These opposing views of what to do in this case help to clarify what I believe is one of the central points of confusion about the informed consent process as it is currently used. Surgeons and patients alike often believe that the information transfer – that is, describing the risks of the surgery – is the central goal of the process. However, many studies have shown that patients do not actually remember much of what they are told by their surgeons. Specifically, few risks are remembered even on the same day that the surgeon has reviewed them and the consent form is signed. These data clearly suggest to me that the more important aspect of the informed consent process is the communication between the surgeon and the patient.

Communication suggests something more than providing a lecture to a patient. It suggests the importance of listening and responding to requests for more or less information. Given that the requirement for informed consent prior to surgery is grounded on the principle of respecting a patient’s autonomy, it seems clear that when a patient does not want to hear the information that a surgeon wants to convey, the surgeon must respect the patient’s choice not to be informed.

 

 

Although Dr. S had felt that something was missing in the consent process since it did not include "the usual discussion of risks," the patient’s choices had been respected and Dr. S had fully discharged his responsibilities in obtaining the patient’s informed consent.

Dr. Angelos is an ACS Fellow, the Linda Kohler Anderson Professor of Surgery and Surgical Ethics, chief, endocrine surgery, and associate director of the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics at the University of Chicago.

Obtaining informed consent for surgery is one of the most common tasks surgeons perform. Ensuring that a patient has the capacity to make a decision and then explaining the indications, risks, and alternatives to the surgery is something that surgeons do hundreds of times a year. Although the process is routine, it reflects the importance of respecting patients’ autonomy in making informed decisions about their health care. Informed consent has been an accepted practice in American surgery for decades, but questions about the process can arise and elicit varied responses among surgeons.

Recently, an experienced colleague (Dr. S) called me to discuss a case that had been troubling him. A 68-year-old man had been referred to him for a surgical opinion after experiencing recurrent episodes of diverticulitis. He was a former insurance executive, now retired. He was married, but came without his wife to the appointment with Dr. S.

After completing the history and physical examination and reviewing the imaging, Dr. S recommended an elective sigmoid colon resection. He explained to the patient what was involved in the surgery and the expected recovery. According to Dr. S, the patient then stated, "I understand. When can we schedule it?" At this point, Dr. S stated that a few more things needed to be reviewed and began to discuss the potential risks of the surgery. The patient stopped him abruptly, saying that he knew that there were risks, but he preferred not to hear about them.

When Dr. S responded that it is always good to know the risks when deciding to have surgery, the patient stated, "Look, I trust my primary care doctor who sent me to see you. You seem like a good surgeon, and I have confidence in you. I don’t want to hear about the risks, because my hearing them won’t make them not happen and will only make me worry. I’ll sign anything that you want, but I don’t want you to tell me the risks."

Dr. S felt torn. He had always felt that the consent process was primarily about informing the patient of what could happen. Reviewing the potential risks would help the patient to become better informed in making the decision to have surgery. Dr. S felt that his patient’s desire not to be informed had short-circuited the process, and it now seemed incomplete.

Dr. S offered to call the patient’s wife to discuss the risks with her, but the patient said that would not be necessary since he was making his own decisions. Although there was no hostility in the patient’s remarks, Dr. S felt that he had pushed hard enough, so he obtained a signature on the consent form and documented in his note that he had offered to inform the patient of the risks but that the patient had refused to hear them.

In the 3 weeks between this office visit and the surgery, Dr. S related the case to a number of his surgical colleagues and received diametrically opposing views. One group of surgeons stated that as the surgeon, Dr. S had an ethical responsibility to ensure that his patient knew of the risks of the procedure. They felt strongly that unless Dr. S had reviewed these risks with the patient, the consent was not valid because "it was not truly informed." Another group of surgeons felt that the ethical responsibility was not to inform the patient, but rather to provide the opportunity for the patient to be informed. This second group felt that pushing the patient to hear information that he did not want to hear would actually be violating his autonomous choice not to be informed.

These opposing views of what to do in this case help to clarify what I believe is one of the central points of confusion about the informed consent process as it is currently used. Surgeons and patients alike often believe that the information transfer – that is, describing the risks of the surgery – is the central goal of the process. However, many studies have shown that patients do not actually remember much of what they are told by their surgeons. Specifically, few risks are remembered even on the same day that the surgeon has reviewed them and the consent form is signed. These data clearly suggest to me that the more important aspect of the informed consent process is the communication between the surgeon and the patient.

Communication suggests something more than providing a lecture to a patient. It suggests the importance of listening and responding to requests for more or less information. Given that the requirement for informed consent prior to surgery is grounded on the principle of respecting a patient’s autonomy, it seems clear that when a patient does not want to hear the information that a surgeon wants to convey, the surgeon must respect the patient’s choice not to be informed.

 

 

Although Dr. S had felt that something was missing in the consent process since it did not include "the usual discussion of risks," the patient’s choices had been respected and Dr. S had fully discharged his responsibilities in obtaining the patient’s informed consent.

Dr. Angelos is an ACS Fellow, the Linda Kohler Anderson Professor of Surgery and Surgical Ethics, chief, endocrine surgery, and associate director of the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics at the University of Chicago.

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Informed Consent: Information Transfer or Communication?
Display Headline
Informed Consent: Information Transfer or Communication?
Legacy Keywords
informed consent surgery, Dr. Peter Angelos
Legacy Keywords
informed consent surgery, Dr. Peter Angelos
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

The Gift That Keeps on Giving

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 08:20
Display Headline
The Gift That Keeps on Giving

Although unraveling the human genome has been exciting and potentially beneficial, I was a bit dismayed to discover that our genes barely outnumber those of the chimpanzee and, in fact, are only 50% greater in number than those of the fruit fly. If they were able to communicate, even the most discriminating chimpanzee – and especially the humble fruit fly – would likely admit that they are several rungs below us on the animal kingdom ladder. Fortunately, it turns out that this is not the whole story.

The human microbiome project (HMP), close on the heels of the genome undertaking, has found that we have many more genes working for us than those located on the strands of our DNA. The HMP analysis reveals that each of us has more than 100 trillion microorganisms living in the many nooks and crannies of our bodies, with the highest concentration in the gastrointestinal tract. This population of microbes is incredibly diverse, and its exact composition is unique to each of us. Thus, in addition to the individuality granted to us by the genes we receive from our parents, each of us is also a distinctive and rather complex ecosystem.

Not only do these creatures live in and on us peacefully most of the time, they also add to our genetic complement. Whereas our DNA contains only 23,000 genes, these microorganisms in aggregate account for 100 times more genes, several of which transcribe proteins that are essential for our normal daily functioning. For example, they manufacture enzymes that allow digestion of complex carbohydrates that account for more than 10% of our daily calories and that would be indigestible if it were not for the contributions of this microscopic workforce. They also make a variety of vitamins (for example, folic acid, B2, and B12), and they have the capability of gearing production to one’s needs depending on diet and other circumstances. Furthermore, the microbiome likely plays a significant role in the development of our immune system.

When this large population of indigenous bacteria is in appropriate balance, all is well. However, when the equilibrium among species is disrupted by antibiotic therapy or other environmental influences, one or more of a long list of maladies may result. Alterations in the microbiome have been implicated as being a factor in diseases as diverse as colon and pancreatic cancer, diabetes, autism, multiple sclerosis, irritable bowel syndrome, and Clostridium difficile colitis. The latter, usually caused by antibiotic therapy, has even been treated successfully by restoring the microbiome to its normal state by means of a stool transplant from a normal donor. The relationship between the composition of the microbiome and the other disorders is less well understood but is fertile ground for further studies. Such investigations may open doors to future therapies for heretofore untreatable diseases.

Particularly fascinating is the association between the microbiome and the nutritional state. Since microbiomes play an important role in processing what we eat, it makes sense that these microscopic travelers might in part determine our body habitus. Dr. Jeffrey Gordon and his associates at Washington University, St. Louis, have investigated this intriguing prospect (Nature 2006;44:1022-3). They have shown in both animal and human studies that the composition of the microbiome is closely related to the degree of obesity or leanness of the subjects. Of the 100 or so known phyla of bacteria, only two, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, account for more than 90% of the microbes in our gastrointestinal tract. Obese mice and humans have a higher ratio of firmicutes to bacteroidetes than do their lean counterparts. Moreover, transplanting the microbiome from obese mice to germ-free animals results in an increase in the body fat of the latter group. Additionally, obese individuals who effectively diet over time increase their intestinal Bacteroidetes-to-Firmicutes ratio.

A common topic of discussion in Surgery News is the worldwide epidemic of obesity and its treatment with a variety of surgical procedures. It is within the realm of possibility that simply altering the microbiome of obese patients might help to resolve this affliction, which impairs the quality of life of so many.

So what is the gift that keeps on giving? It is our microbiome. For more than a century, bacteria have been considered one of the scourges of mankind. It is appropriate as the holiday season approaches that we finally acknowledge the contributions that these usually despised organisms make to our daily welfare. In turn and in the spirit of giving back, we can take some pride in the fact that we provide a warm and hospitable home for these friendly symbionts.

 

 

Dr. Rikkers is editor in chief of Surgery News.

Author and Disclosure Information

 

 

Publications
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

 

Author and Disclosure Information

 

 

Although unraveling the human genome has been exciting and potentially beneficial, I was a bit dismayed to discover that our genes barely outnumber those of the chimpanzee and, in fact, are only 50% greater in number than those of the fruit fly. If they were able to communicate, even the most discriminating chimpanzee – and especially the humble fruit fly – would likely admit that they are several rungs below us on the animal kingdom ladder. Fortunately, it turns out that this is not the whole story.

The human microbiome project (HMP), close on the heels of the genome undertaking, has found that we have many more genes working for us than those located on the strands of our DNA. The HMP analysis reveals that each of us has more than 100 trillion microorganisms living in the many nooks and crannies of our bodies, with the highest concentration in the gastrointestinal tract. This population of microbes is incredibly diverse, and its exact composition is unique to each of us. Thus, in addition to the individuality granted to us by the genes we receive from our parents, each of us is also a distinctive and rather complex ecosystem.

Not only do these creatures live in and on us peacefully most of the time, they also add to our genetic complement. Whereas our DNA contains only 23,000 genes, these microorganisms in aggregate account for 100 times more genes, several of which transcribe proteins that are essential for our normal daily functioning. For example, they manufacture enzymes that allow digestion of complex carbohydrates that account for more than 10% of our daily calories and that would be indigestible if it were not for the contributions of this microscopic workforce. They also make a variety of vitamins (for example, folic acid, B2, and B12), and they have the capability of gearing production to one’s needs depending on diet and other circumstances. Furthermore, the microbiome likely plays a significant role in the development of our immune system.

When this large population of indigenous bacteria is in appropriate balance, all is well. However, when the equilibrium among species is disrupted by antibiotic therapy or other environmental influences, one or more of a long list of maladies may result. Alterations in the microbiome have been implicated as being a factor in diseases as diverse as colon and pancreatic cancer, diabetes, autism, multiple sclerosis, irritable bowel syndrome, and Clostridium difficile colitis. The latter, usually caused by antibiotic therapy, has even been treated successfully by restoring the microbiome to its normal state by means of a stool transplant from a normal donor. The relationship between the composition of the microbiome and the other disorders is less well understood but is fertile ground for further studies. Such investigations may open doors to future therapies for heretofore untreatable diseases.

Particularly fascinating is the association between the microbiome and the nutritional state. Since microbiomes play an important role in processing what we eat, it makes sense that these microscopic travelers might in part determine our body habitus. Dr. Jeffrey Gordon and his associates at Washington University, St. Louis, have investigated this intriguing prospect (Nature 2006;44:1022-3). They have shown in both animal and human studies that the composition of the microbiome is closely related to the degree of obesity or leanness of the subjects. Of the 100 or so known phyla of bacteria, only two, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, account for more than 90% of the microbes in our gastrointestinal tract. Obese mice and humans have a higher ratio of firmicutes to bacteroidetes than do their lean counterparts. Moreover, transplanting the microbiome from obese mice to germ-free animals results in an increase in the body fat of the latter group. Additionally, obese individuals who effectively diet over time increase their intestinal Bacteroidetes-to-Firmicutes ratio.

A common topic of discussion in Surgery News is the worldwide epidemic of obesity and its treatment with a variety of surgical procedures. It is within the realm of possibility that simply altering the microbiome of obese patients might help to resolve this affliction, which impairs the quality of life of so many.

So what is the gift that keeps on giving? It is our microbiome. For more than a century, bacteria have been considered one of the scourges of mankind. It is appropriate as the holiday season approaches that we finally acknowledge the contributions that these usually despised organisms make to our daily welfare. In turn and in the spirit of giving back, we can take some pride in the fact that we provide a warm and hospitable home for these friendly symbionts.

 

 

Dr. Rikkers is editor in chief of Surgery News.

Although unraveling the human genome has been exciting and potentially beneficial, I was a bit dismayed to discover that our genes barely outnumber those of the chimpanzee and, in fact, are only 50% greater in number than those of the fruit fly. If they were able to communicate, even the most discriminating chimpanzee – and especially the humble fruit fly – would likely admit that they are several rungs below us on the animal kingdom ladder. Fortunately, it turns out that this is not the whole story.

The human microbiome project (HMP), close on the heels of the genome undertaking, has found that we have many more genes working for us than those located on the strands of our DNA. The HMP analysis reveals that each of us has more than 100 trillion microorganisms living in the many nooks and crannies of our bodies, with the highest concentration in the gastrointestinal tract. This population of microbes is incredibly diverse, and its exact composition is unique to each of us. Thus, in addition to the individuality granted to us by the genes we receive from our parents, each of us is also a distinctive and rather complex ecosystem.

Not only do these creatures live in and on us peacefully most of the time, they also add to our genetic complement. Whereas our DNA contains only 23,000 genes, these microorganisms in aggregate account for 100 times more genes, several of which transcribe proteins that are essential for our normal daily functioning. For example, they manufacture enzymes that allow digestion of complex carbohydrates that account for more than 10% of our daily calories and that would be indigestible if it were not for the contributions of this microscopic workforce. They also make a variety of vitamins (for example, folic acid, B2, and B12), and they have the capability of gearing production to one’s needs depending on diet and other circumstances. Furthermore, the microbiome likely plays a significant role in the development of our immune system.

When this large population of indigenous bacteria is in appropriate balance, all is well. However, when the equilibrium among species is disrupted by antibiotic therapy or other environmental influences, one or more of a long list of maladies may result. Alterations in the microbiome have been implicated as being a factor in diseases as diverse as colon and pancreatic cancer, diabetes, autism, multiple sclerosis, irritable bowel syndrome, and Clostridium difficile colitis. The latter, usually caused by antibiotic therapy, has even been treated successfully by restoring the microbiome to its normal state by means of a stool transplant from a normal donor. The relationship between the composition of the microbiome and the other disorders is less well understood but is fertile ground for further studies. Such investigations may open doors to future therapies for heretofore untreatable diseases.

Particularly fascinating is the association between the microbiome and the nutritional state. Since microbiomes play an important role in processing what we eat, it makes sense that these microscopic travelers might in part determine our body habitus. Dr. Jeffrey Gordon and his associates at Washington University, St. Louis, have investigated this intriguing prospect (Nature 2006;44:1022-3). They have shown in both animal and human studies that the composition of the microbiome is closely related to the degree of obesity or leanness of the subjects. Of the 100 or so known phyla of bacteria, only two, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, account for more than 90% of the microbes in our gastrointestinal tract. Obese mice and humans have a higher ratio of firmicutes to bacteroidetes than do their lean counterparts. Moreover, transplanting the microbiome from obese mice to germ-free animals results in an increase in the body fat of the latter group. Additionally, obese individuals who effectively diet over time increase their intestinal Bacteroidetes-to-Firmicutes ratio.

A common topic of discussion in Surgery News is the worldwide epidemic of obesity and its treatment with a variety of surgical procedures. It is within the realm of possibility that simply altering the microbiome of obese patients might help to resolve this affliction, which impairs the quality of life of so many.

So what is the gift that keeps on giving? It is our microbiome. For more than a century, bacteria have been considered one of the scourges of mankind. It is appropriate as the holiday season approaches that we finally acknowledge the contributions that these usually despised organisms make to our daily welfare. In turn and in the spirit of giving back, we can take some pride in the fact that we provide a warm and hospitable home for these friendly symbionts.

 

 

Dr. Rikkers is editor in chief of Surgery News.

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
The Gift That Keeps on Giving
Display Headline
The Gift That Keeps on Giving
Sections
Disallow All Ads

Benefit of Young Liver Donors Scrutinized in Study

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 12:20
Display Headline
Benefit of Young Liver Donors Scrutinized in Study

BOSTON – Younger age of deceased liver donors appeared to improve patient and graft survival when donors and recipients were both of younger age, but not when younger donor livers went to older recipients, according to a secondary analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network national database from 2002 to 2011.

"Matching younger recipients with younger donors appears to be the best strategy in order to maximize life years after liver transplantation. However, before this can be considered for allocation policy, much more work needs to be done," including analyses specific to United Network for Organ Sharing regions, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease groups, and modeling of the potential life-years saved with a change in allocation policy, said lead investigator Dr. Neehar D. Parikh of the Comprehensive Transplant Center at Northwestern University, Chicago.

The risk of recipient death is known to increase with advancing donor age, beginning at ages older than 40 years and especially with donors older than 60 years. Also, advancing recipient age has been shown, with some controversy, to affect outcomes negatively, Dr. Parikh said at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Dr. Parikh and his colleagues’ study of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database analyzed 26,849 cases of liver transplantation in which the donor was younger than the recipient, 782 cases in which they were the same age, and 12,107 cases in which the donor was older than the recipient. They also looked at outcomes of patients aged 18-40 years and those 60 years or older, based on the donor age.

As would be expected, recipients had progressively younger mean ages as the donor age increased: 56 years for recipients with younger donors, 52 years for same-age donors, and 48 years for older donors. Hepatitis C virus seropositivity was lowest in recipients who had an older donor (41%), followed by same-age recipient-donor pairs (51%), and recipients who had a younger donor (50%).

In Kaplan-Meier analyses, patient survival at 1 year was significantly worse for those who received a liver from a donor with an older age (86%) or the same age (86%) than from a younger donor (87.4%). Similar results were seen at 3 years between recipients of livers from older (74.5%), same age (73.5%), and younger donors (77.9%).

Older donor age increased the risk for patient death by 14% and graft failure by 13%, in comparison with younger donor age in an adjusted analysis.

For every 10-year increase in patient age for younger donors, the risk of patient mortality increased by 24% and graft failure by 17%. For every 10 years the donor was younger than the recipient, however, there was a 27% decline in the risk of patient mortality and 30% decrease in the risk of graft failure. A small but significance beneficial interaction was found between young donor age and young recipient age on both outcomes.

In contrast, for every 10 years the donor was older than the recipient, the risk of patient mortality increased 9% and the risk of graft failure increased by 22%, and there was no significant interaction between recipient and donor age.

When compared against donor and recipient pairs who were both aged 18-40 years, the risk of patient mortality and graft failure increased significantly for all other combinations of donor and recipient pairs: recipients aged 18-40 years and donors aged 60 years or older (hazard ratios of 1.76 and 1.49, respectively), recipients aged 60 years older and donors aged 18-40 years (HRs of 1.67 and 1.83), and recipients and donors both aged 60 years or older (HRs of 2.12 and 1.87). These results were consistent at both 1 and 3 years.

The overall results "suggest that there is something intrinsic about being older or having an older graft that cannot be remediated by graft or patient age factors," Dr. Parikh said.

The results might be explained in livers from older donors by impaired liver regeneration and increased susceptibility to ischemic reperfusion injury, while older recipients might have decreased circulating stem cells and more competing risks that are not adequately risk adjusted in the available data in older recipients, he said.

One audience member noted that there is still a "huge survival advantage" in all patient populations that receive younger donor livers and that allocating organs based on age is a slippery slope.

Dr. Parikh and his colleagues had no relevant financial disclosures.

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
young liver donors, deceased liver donors, Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, liver meeting 2012
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

BOSTON – Younger age of deceased liver donors appeared to improve patient and graft survival when donors and recipients were both of younger age, but not when younger donor livers went to older recipients, according to a secondary analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network national database from 2002 to 2011.

"Matching younger recipients with younger donors appears to be the best strategy in order to maximize life years after liver transplantation. However, before this can be considered for allocation policy, much more work needs to be done," including analyses specific to United Network for Organ Sharing regions, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease groups, and modeling of the potential life-years saved with a change in allocation policy, said lead investigator Dr. Neehar D. Parikh of the Comprehensive Transplant Center at Northwestern University, Chicago.

The risk of recipient death is known to increase with advancing donor age, beginning at ages older than 40 years and especially with donors older than 60 years. Also, advancing recipient age has been shown, with some controversy, to affect outcomes negatively, Dr. Parikh said at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Dr. Parikh and his colleagues’ study of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database analyzed 26,849 cases of liver transplantation in which the donor was younger than the recipient, 782 cases in which they were the same age, and 12,107 cases in which the donor was older than the recipient. They also looked at outcomes of patients aged 18-40 years and those 60 years or older, based on the donor age.

As would be expected, recipients had progressively younger mean ages as the donor age increased: 56 years for recipients with younger donors, 52 years for same-age donors, and 48 years for older donors. Hepatitis C virus seropositivity was lowest in recipients who had an older donor (41%), followed by same-age recipient-donor pairs (51%), and recipients who had a younger donor (50%).

In Kaplan-Meier analyses, patient survival at 1 year was significantly worse for those who received a liver from a donor with an older age (86%) or the same age (86%) than from a younger donor (87.4%). Similar results were seen at 3 years between recipients of livers from older (74.5%), same age (73.5%), and younger donors (77.9%).

Older donor age increased the risk for patient death by 14% and graft failure by 13%, in comparison with younger donor age in an adjusted analysis.

For every 10-year increase in patient age for younger donors, the risk of patient mortality increased by 24% and graft failure by 17%. For every 10 years the donor was younger than the recipient, however, there was a 27% decline in the risk of patient mortality and 30% decrease in the risk of graft failure. A small but significance beneficial interaction was found between young donor age and young recipient age on both outcomes.

In contrast, for every 10 years the donor was older than the recipient, the risk of patient mortality increased 9% and the risk of graft failure increased by 22%, and there was no significant interaction between recipient and donor age.

When compared against donor and recipient pairs who were both aged 18-40 years, the risk of patient mortality and graft failure increased significantly for all other combinations of donor and recipient pairs: recipients aged 18-40 years and donors aged 60 years or older (hazard ratios of 1.76 and 1.49, respectively), recipients aged 60 years older and donors aged 18-40 years (HRs of 1.67 and 1.83), and recipients and donors both aged 60 years or older (HRs of 2.12 and 1.87). These results were consistent at both 1 and 3 years.

The overall results "suggest that there is something intrinsic about being older or having an older graft that cannot be remediated by graft or patient age factors," Dr. Parikh said.

The results might be explained in livers from older donors by impaired liver regeneration and increased susceptibility to ischemic reperfusion injury, while older recipients might have decreased circulating stem cells and more competing risks that are not adequately risk adjusted in the available data in older recipients, he said.

One audience member noted that there is still a "huge survival advantage" in all patient populations that receive younger donor livers and that allocating organs based on age is a slippery slope.

Dr. Parikh and his colleagues had no relevant financial disclosures.

BOSTON – Younger age of deceased liver donors appeared to improve patient and graft survival when donors and recipients were both of younger age, but not when younger donor livers went to older recipients, according to a secondary analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network national database from 2002 to 2011.

"Matching younger recipients with younger donors appears to be the best strategy in order to maximize life years after liver transplantation. However, before this can be considered for allocation policy, much more work needs to be done," including analyses specific to United Network for Organ Sharing regions, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease groups, and modeling of the potential life-years saved with a change in allocation policy, said lead investigator Dr. Neehar D. Parikh of the Comprehensive Transplant Center at Northwestern University, Chicago.

The risk of recipient death is known to increase with advancing donor age, beginning at ages older than 40 years and especially with donors older than 60 years. Also, advancing recipient age has been shown, with some controversy, to affect outcomes negatively, Dr. Parikh said at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Dr. Parikh and his colleagues’ study of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database analyzed 26,849 cases of liver transplantation in which the donor was younger than the recipient, 782 cases in which they were the same age, and 12,107 cases in which the donor was older than the recipient. They also looked at outcomes of patients aged 18-40 years and those 60 years or older, based on the donor age.

As would be expected, recipients had progressively younger mean ages as the donor age increased: 56 years for recipients with younger donors, 52 years for same-age donors, and 48 years for older donors. Hepatitis C virus seropositivity was lowest in recipients who had an older donor (41%), followed by same-age recipient-donor pairs (51%), and recipients who had a younger donor (50%).

In Kaplan-Meier analyses, patient survival at 1 year was significantly worse for those who received a liver from a donor with an older age (86%) or the same age (86%) than from a younger donor (87.4%). Similar results were seen at 3 years between recipients of livers from older (74.5%), same age (73.5%), and younger donors (77.9%).

Older donor age increased the risk for patient death by 14% and graft failure by 13%, in comparison with younger donor age in an adjusted analysis.

For every 10-year increase in patient age for younger donors, the risk of patient mortality increased by 24% and graft failure by 17%. For every 10 years the donor was younger than the recipient, however, there was a 27% decline in the risk of patient mortality and 30% decrease in the risk of graft failure. A small but significance beneficial interaction was found between young donor age and young recipient age on both outcomes.

In contrast, for every 10 years the donor was older than the recipient, the risk of patient mortality increased 9% and the risk of graft failure increased by 22%, and there was no significant interaction between recipient and donor age.

When compared against donor and recipient pairs who were both aged 18-40 years, the risk of patient mortality and graft failure increased significantly for all other combinations of donor and recipient pairs: recipients aged 18-40 years and donors aged 60 years or older (hazard ratios of 1.76 and 1.49, respectively), recipients aged 60 years older and donors aged 18-40 years (HRs of 1.67 and 1.83), and recipients and donors both aged 60 years or older (HRs of 2.12 and 1.87). These results were consistent at both 1 and 3 years.

The overall results "suggest that there is something intrinsic about being older or having an older graft that cannot be remediated by graft or patient age factors," Dr. Parikh said.

The results might be explained in livers from older donors by impaired liver regeneration and increased susceptibility to ischemic reperfusion injury, while older recipients might have decreased circulating stem cells and more competing risks that are not adequately risk adjusted in the available data in older recipients, he said.

One audience member noted that there is still a "huge survival advantage" in all patient populations that receive younger donor livers and that allocating organs based on age is a slippery slope.

Dr. Parikh and his colleagues had no relevant financial disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Benefit of Young Liver Donors Scrutinized in Study
Display Headline
Benefit of Young Liver Donors Scrutinized in Study
Legacy Keywords
young liver donors, deceased liver donors, Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, liver meeting 2012
Legacy Keywords
young liver donors, deceased liver donors, Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, liver meeting 2012
Article Source

AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Major Finding: For every 10-year increase in patient age for younger donors, the risk of patient mortality increased by 24% and graft failure by 17%; for every 10 years the donor was younger than the recipient, there was a 27% decline in the risk of patient mortality and a 30% decrease in the risk of graft failure.

Data Source: This was a secondary analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network national database from 2002 to 2011 for adult cadaveric liver transplantation.

Disclosures: Dr. Parikh and his colleagues had no relevant financial disclosures.

Strontium May Spare More OA Knees from Surgery

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 03/13/2019 - 11:16
Display Headline
Strontium May Spare More OA Knees from Surgery

WASHINGTON – A daily dose of strontium ranelate was associated with a significant delay in joint space narrowing in adults with symptomatic primary knee osteoarthritis, based on data from the phase III Strontium Ranelate Knee Osteoarthritis Trial (SEKOIA).

Strontium renalate currently is not approved in the United States, but it is approved in more than 100 countries for treating osteoporosis, said Dr. Jean-Yves Reginster, who is head of the Center for Investigation in Bone and Articular Cartilage Metabolism at the University of Liège (Belgium).

 

 

Data from nonclinical studies have shown that strontium’s bone-building activity has a positive impact on cartilage as well, he noted at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

To examine the effectiveness of strontium ranelate on the progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA), Dr. Reginster and his colleagues randomized 1,683 adults with symptomatic primary knee OA to 1 g of strontium ranelate per day (566 patients), 2 g/day (558 patients), or a placebo (559 patients). Complete data were available for 1,371 patients. The average age of the patients was 63 years, and 69% were women.

Overall, treatment with either dose of strontium was associated with a significant delay in the radiographic progression of knee OA, which was assessed by measuring the radiological joint space narrowing (JSN) of the medial tibiofemoral compartment of the knee joint.

After 1 year, joint space width decreased by 0.27 mm in the 2-g/day group, 0.23 mm in the 1-g/day group, and 0.37 mm in the placebo group. The differences between the 2-g/day and 1-g/day groups and the placebo group were 0.10 mm and 0.14 mm, respectively.

Significantly less radiological progression was noted in both strontium groups, compared with the placebo group. The percentage of patients with radiological progression (defined as joint space narrowing of at least 0.5 mm) was 26% in the 2-g/day group, 22% in the 1-g/day group, and 33% in the placebo group.

"The structural effect is translated clinically into a lower number of patients having a radiological progression over thresholds predictive of OA-related surgery," Dr. Reginster said. The findings suggest that strontium ranelate could reduce the need for knee surgery in OA patients, he added.

In addition, significantly more patients in the 2-g/day group exceeded the minimally perceptible clinical improvement (MCPI) threshold, compared with the placebo patients, on subscores of pain, stiffness, and physical function. The percentage of patients in the 1-g/day group above this threshold was not significantly higher than in the placebo group.

No significant differences in adverse events were observed among the three groups, and the incidence of serious adverse events was 17% in all groups.

The study findings also appeared online on Nov. 9 (Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012 [doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202231]).

The study was sponsored by Servier. Dr. Reginster disclosed financial relationships with multiple companies, including Servier.

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

 

 

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
strontium ranelate, primary knee osteoarthritis, Strontium Ranelate Knee Osteoarthritis Trial, osteoarthritis treatment
Author and Disclosure Information

 

 

Author and Disclosure Information

 

 

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

WASHINGTON – A daily dose of strontium ranelate was associated with a significant delay in joint space narrowing in adults with symptomatic primary knee osteoarthritis, based on data from the phase III Strontium Ranelate Knee Osteoarthritis Trial (SEKOIA).

Strontium renalate currently is not approved in the United States, but it is approved in more than 100 countries for treating osteoporosis, said Dr. Jean-Yves Reginster, who is head of the Center for Investigation in Bone and Articular Cartilage Metabolism at the University of Liège (Belgium).

 

 

Data from nonclinical studies have shown that strontium’s bone-building activity has a positive impact on cartilage as well, he noted at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

To examine the effectiveness of strontium ranelate on the progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA), Dr. Reginster and his colleagues randomized 1,683 adults with symptomatic primary knee OA to 1 g of strontium ranelate per day (566 patients), 2 g/day (558 patients), or a placebo (559 patients). Complete data were available for 1,371 patients. The average age of the patients was 63 years, and 69% were women.

Overall, treatment with either dose of strontium was associated with a significant delay in the radiographic progression of knee OA, which was assessed by measuring the radiological joint space narrowing (JSN) of the medial tibiofemoral compartment of the knee joint.

After 1 year, joint space width decreased by 0.27 mm in the 2-g/day group, 0.23 mm in the 1-g/day group, and 0.37 mm in the placebo group. The differences between the 2-g/day and 1-g/day groups and the placebo group were 0.10 mm and 0.14 mm, respectively.

Significantly less radiological progression was noted in both strontium groups, compared with the placebo group. The percentage of patients with radiological progression (defined as joint space narrowing of at least 0.5 mm) was 26% in the 2-g/day group, 22% in the 1-g/day group, and 33% in the placebo group.

"The structural effect is translated clinically into a lower number of patients having a radiological progression over thresholds predictive of OA-related surgery," Dr. Reginster said. The findings suggest that strontium ranelate could reduce the need for knee surgery in OA patients, he added.

In addition, significantly more patients in the 2-g/day group exceeded the minimally perceptible clinical improvement (MCPI) threshold, compared with the placebo patients, on subscores of pain, stiffness, and physical function. The percentage of patients in the 1-g/day group above this threshold was not significantly higher than in the placebo group.

No significant differences in adverse events were observed among the three groups, and the incidence of serious adverse events was 17% in all groups.

The study findings also appeared online on Nov. 9 (Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012 [doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202231]).

The study was sponsored by Servier. Dr. Reginster disclosed financial relationships with multiple companies, including Servier.

WASHINGTON – A daily dose of strontium ranelate was associated with a significant delay in joint space narrowing in adults with symptomatic primary knee osteoarthritis, based on data from the phase III Strontium Ranelate Knee Osteoarthritis Trial (SEKOIA).

Strontium renalate currently is not approved in the United States, but it is approved in more than 100 countries for treating osteoporosis, said Dr. Jean-Yves Reginster, who is head of the Center for Investigation in Bone and Articular Cartilage Metabolism at the University of Liège (Belgium).

 

 

Data from nonclinical studies have shown that strontium’s bone-building activity has a positive impact on cartilage as well, he noted at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

To examine the effectiveness of strontium ranelate on the progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA), Dr. Reginster and his colleagues randomized 1,683 adults with symptomatic primary knee OA to 1 g of strontium ranelate per day (566 patients), 2 g/day (558 patients), or a placebo (559 patients). Complete data were available for 1,371 patients. The average age of the patients was 63 years, and 69% were women.

Overall, treatment with either dose of strontium was associated with a significant delay in the radiographic progression of knee OA, which was assessed by measuring the radiological joint space narrowing (JSN) of the medial tibiofemoral compartment of the knee joint.

After 1 year, joint space width decreased by 0.27 mm in the 2-g/day group, 0.23 mm in the 1-g/day group, and 0.37 mm in the placebo group. The differences between the 2-g/day and 1-g/day groups and the placebo group were 0.10 mm and 0.14 mm, respectively.

Significantly less radiological progression was noted in both strontium groups, compared with the placebo group. The percentage of patients with radiological progression (defined as joint space narrowing of at least 0.5 mm) was 26% in the 2-g/day group, 22% in the 1-g/day group, and 33% in the placebo group.

"The structural effect is translated clinically into a lower number of patients having a radiological progression over thresholds predictive of OA-related surgery," Dr. Reginster said. The findings suggest that strontium ranelate could reduce the need for knee surgery in OA patients, he added.

In addition, significantly more patients in the 2-g/day group exceeded the minimally perceptible clinical improvement (MCPI) threshold, compared with the placebo patients, on subscores of pain, stiffness, and physical function. The percentage of patients in the 1-g/day group above this threshold was not significantly higher than in the placebo group.

No significant differences in adverse events were observed among the three groups, and the incidence of serious adverse events was 17% in all groups.

The study findings also appeared online on Nov. 9 (Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012 [doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202231]).

The study was sponsored by Servier. Dr. Reginster disclosed financial relationships with multiple companies, including Servier.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Strontium May Spare More OA Knees from Surgery
Display Headline
Strontium May Spare More OA Knees from Surgery
Legacy Keywords
strontium ranelate, primary knee osteoarthritis, Strontium Ranelate Knee Osteoarthritis Trial, osteoarthritis treatment
Legacy Keywords
strontium ranelate, primary knee osteoarthritis, Strontium Ranelate Knee Osteoarthritis Trial, osteoarthritis treatment
Article Source

AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY

PURLs Copyright

Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Major Finding: A daily dose of 1 or 2 g of strontium ranelate was associated with a significant delay in the progression of knee osteoarthritis; joint space width decreased by 0.27 mm with 2 g/day, 0.23 mm with 1 g/day, and 0.37 mm with a placebo.

Data Source: The data come from a randomized trial of 1,683 adults with symptomatic primary knee OA.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Servier. Dr. Reginster disclosed financial relationships with multiple pharmaceutical companies, including Servier.

Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Acetaminophen Liver Failure Least Likely to Get Transplant

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 12:20
Display Headline
Acetaminophen Liver Failure Least Likely to Get Transplant

BOSTON – Acetaminophen toxicity is the most frequent cause of acute liver failure in the United States and its usually milder presentation, along with comorbid psychosocial issues, explain why fewer patients with the etiology undergo liver transplantation, compared with other causes, according to a 10-year retrospective study of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Acute Liver Failure database.

Dr. K. Rajender Reddy and his colleagues in the National Institutes of Health Acute Liver Failure Study Group set out to determine factors that could help clinicians to improve their selection of acute liver failure patients for liver transplantation listing and their decision to proceed with transplantation.

Dr. K. Rajender Reddy

At the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Dr. Reddy reported that of 1,144 patients who had at least 1 year of follow-up in the database, 491 (43%) had an acetaminophen etiology for acute liver failure, but only 26% of all patients listed for transplantation had an acetaminophen etiology and just 14% of all transplants occurred in patients with acetaminophen toxicity as the underlying cause.

In comparison, patients with other etiologies had higher listing and transplantation rates, with the highest being for autoimmune hepatitis (62% of all patients listed and 50% of all transplanted).

Overall during 2000-2010, 697 patients were not listed and not transplanted (group A), 177 were listed and not transplanted (group B), and 270 were listed and transplanted (group C). After 2 years of follow-up, patient survival was highest in group C (82%), followed by group A (47%) and group B (41%). Survival at 21 days followed the same pattern (C, 89%; A, 58%; B, 45%). Patients in groups A and B with acetaminophen etiology had greater 21-day survival than did those without an acetaminophen etiology.

Patients in group A had significantly higher rates of positive toxicology screens than did groups B and C (43% vs. 35% and 19%, respectively) and history of illicit drug use (10% vs. 4% and 2%).

Comparisons between patients who died in group B and all patients in group C could not find significant risk factors to explain the higher mortality in group B, including longer wait list times and variations in survival and transplant rates by geographic location, although greater coma severity may have contributed to the higher mortality, said Dr. Reddy, professor of medicine in the division of gastroenterology at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Dr. Reddy said that he had no relevant financial disclosures. The study was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases to the National Institutes of Health Acute Liver Failure Study Group.

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
acute liver failure, acetaminophen toxicity, liver failure causes, Dr. K. Rajender Reddy, liver disease meeting
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

BOSTON – Acetaminophen toxicity is the most frequent cause of acute liver failure in the United States and its usually milder presentation, along with comorbid psychosocial issues, explain why fewer patients with the etiology undergo liver transplantation, compared with other causes, according to a 10-year retrospective study of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Acute Liver Failure database.

Dr. K. Rajender Reddy and his colleagues in the National Institutes of Health Acute Liver Failure Study Group set out to determine factors that could help clinicians to improve their selection of acute liver failure patients for liver transplantation listing and their decision to proceed with transplantation.

Dr. K. Rajender Reddy

At the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Dr. Reddy reported that of 1,144 patients who had at least 1 year of follow-up in the database, 491 (43%) had an acetaminophen etiology for acute liver failure, but only 26% of all patients listed for transplantation had an acetaminophen etiology and just 14% of all transplants occurred in patients with acetaminophen toxicity as the underlying cause.

In comparison, patients with other etiologies had higher listing and transplantation rates, with the highest being for autoimmune hepatitis (62% of all patients listed and 50% of all transplanted).

Overall during 2000-2010, 697 patients were not listed and not transplanted (group A), 177 were listed and not transplanted (group B), and 270 were listed and transplanted (group C). After 2 years of follow-up, patient survival was highest in group C (82%), followed by group A (47%) and group B (41%). Survival at 21 days followed the same pattern (C, 89%; A, 58%; B, 45%). Patients in groups A and B with acetaminophen etiology had greater 21-day survival than did those without an acetaminophen etiology.

Patients in group A had significantly higher rates of positive toxicology screens than did groups B and C (43% vs. 35% and 19%, respectively) and history of illicit drug use (10% vs. 4% and 2%).

Comparisons between patients who died in group B and all patients in group C could not find significant risk factors to explain the higher mortality in group B, including longer wait list times and variations in survival and transplant rates by geographic location, although greater coma severity may have contributed to the higher mortality, said Dr. Reddy, professor of medicine in the division of gastroenterology at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Dr. Reddy said that he had no relevant financial disclosures. The study was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases to the National Institutes of Health Acute Liver Failure Study Group.

BOSTON – Acetaminophen toxicity is the most frequent cause of acute liver failure in the United States and its usually milder presentation, along with comorbid psychosocial issues, explain why fewer patients with the etiology undergo liver transplantation, compared with other causes, according to a 10-year retrospective study of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Acute Liver Failure database.

Dr. K. Rajender Reddy and his colleagues in the National Institutes of Health Acute Liver Failure Study Group set out to determine factors that could help clinicians to improve their selection of acute liver failure patients for liver transplantation listing and their decision to proceed with transplantation.

Dr. K. Rajender Reddy

At the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Dr. Reddy reported that of 1,144 patients who had at least 1 year of follow-up in the database, 491 (43%) had an acetaminophen etiology for acute liver failure, but only 26% of all patients listed for transplantation had an acetaminophen etiology and just 14% of all transplants occurred in patients with acetaminophen toxicity as the underlying cause.

In comparison, patients with other etiologies had higher listing and transplantation rates, with the highest being for autoimmune hepatitis (62% of all patients listed and 50% of all transplanted).

Overall during 2000-2010, 697 patients were not listed and not transplanted (group A), 177 were listed and not transplanted (group B), and 270 were listed and transplanted (group C). After 2 years of follow-up, patient survival was highest in group C (82%), followed by group A (47%) and group B (41%). Survival at 21 days followed the same pattern (C, 89%; A, 58%; B, 45%). Patients in groups A and B with acetaminophen etiology had greater 21-day survival than did those without an acetaminophen etiology.

Patients in group A had significantly higher rates of positive toxicology screens than did groups B and C (43% vs. 35% and 19%, respectively) and history of illicit drug use (10% vs. 4% and 2%).

Comparisons between patients who died in group B and all patients in group C could not find significant risk factors to explain the higher mortality in group B, including longer wait list times and variations in survival and transplant rates by geographic location, although greater coma severity may have contributed to the higher mortality, said Dr. Reddy, professor of medicine in the division of gastroenterology at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Dr. Reddy said that he had no relevant financial disclosures. The study was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases to the National Institutes of Health Acute Liver Failure Study Group.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Acetaminophen Liver Failure Least Likely to Get Transplant
Display Headline
Acetaminophen Liver Failure Least Likely to Get Transplant
Legacy Keywords
acute liver failure, acetaminophen toxicity, liver failure causes, Dr. K. Rajender Reddy, liver disease meeting
Legacy Keywords
acute liver failure, acetaminophen toxicity, liver failure causes, Dr. K. Rajender Reddy, liver disease meeting
Article Source

AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Major Finding: A total of 43% in the study had an acetaminophen etiology for acute liver failure, but only 26% of all patients listed for transplantation had an acetaminophen etiology and just 14% of all transplants occurred in patients with acetaminophen toxicity as the underlying cause.

Data Source: This was a 10-year retrospective study of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Acute Liver Failure database.

Disclosures: Dr. Reddy said he had no relevant financial disclosures. The study was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases to the National Institutes of Health Acute Liver Failure Study Group.