MDedge Dermatology

Key clinical point: Dupilumab with or without topical corticosteroids (TCS) was beneficial in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) regardless of any prior use of systemic nonsteroidal immunosuppressants (NSISS).

Major finding: Compared with placebo with/without TCS, dupilumab with/without TCS showed significant improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index, SCORing AD, Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, and quality of life in patients with/without prior use of NSISS (P less than .001) by week 16 which continued through week 52 of treatment.

Study details: Findings are from a post hoc analysis of 4 phase 3 clinical trials including 1553 patients with moderate-to-severe AD randomly assigned to placebo or dupilumab as monotherapy for 16 weeks or with concomitant TCS for 16/52 weeks.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Some of the authors declared receiving grants, honoraria and serving as consultant or speaker or on advisory board for various sources. Some of the authors declared being employees and/or holding stocks/stock options at Sanofi, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc or Sanofi Genzyme.

Source: Griffiths C et al. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00558-0.

Key clinical point: Dupilumab with or without topical corticosteroids (TCS) was beneficial in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) regardless of any prior use of systemic nonsteroidal immunosuppressants (NSISS).

Major finding: Compared with placebo with/without TCS, dupilumab with/without TCS showed significant improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index, SCORing AD, Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, and quality of life in patients with/without prior use of NSISS (P less than .001) by week 16 which continued through week 52 of treatment.

Study details: Findings are from a post hoc analysis of 4 phase 3 clinical trials including 1553 patients with moderate-to-severe AD randomly assigned to placebo or dupilumab as monotherapy for 16 weeks or with concomitant TCS for 16/52 weeks.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Some of the authors declared receiving grants, honoraria and serving as consultant or speaker or on advisory board for various sources. Some of the authors declared being employees and/or holding stocks/stock options at Sanofi, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc or Sanofi Genzyme.

Source: Griffiths C et al. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00558-0.

Key clinical point: Dupilumab with or without topical corticosteroids (TCS) was beneficial in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) regardless of any prior use of systemic nonsteroidal immunosuppressants (NSISS).

Major finding: Compared with placebo with/without TCS, dupilumab with/without TCS showed significant improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index, SCORing AD, Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, and quality of life in patients with/without prior use of NSISS (P less than .001) by week 16 which continued through week 52 of treatment.

Study details: Findings are from a post hoc analysis of 4 phase 3 clinical trials including 1553 patients with moderate-to-severe AD randomly assigned to placebo or dupilumab as monotherapy for 16 weeks or with concomitant TCS for 16/52 weeks.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Some of the authors declared receiving grants, honoraria and serving as consultant or speaker or on advisory board for various sources. Some of the authors declared being employees and/or holding stocks/stock options at Sanofi, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc or Sanofi Genzyme.

Source: Griffiths C et al. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00558-0.

Key clinical point: In real world clinical practice, combination of tacrolimus ointment and dupilumab was an effective and safe treatment option for facial atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: On 16 weeks of treatment, a significant decrease was observed in average scores including Investigator’s Global Assessment, overall Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), and head/neck EASI (P less than .0001). Moreover, the rate of improvement in head/neck EASI scores significantly correlated with the rate of improvement in the overall EASI scores (Pearson’s r, 0.61; P less than .01). None of the patients developed herpes simplex, whereas 2 patients developed conjunctivitis.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective chart review of 109 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who initiated dupilumab, of which 60 patients also used tacrolimus ointment. Of these, 20 patients used tacrolimus ointment without any topical steroids.

Disclosures: This work was supported by grants from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.

Source: Matsutani M et al. J Dermatol. 2021 Jun 22. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16039.

Key clinical point: In real world clinical practice, combination of tacrolimus ointment and dupilumab was an effective and safe treatment option for facial atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: On 16 weeks of treatment, a significant decrease was observed in average scores including Investigator’s Global Assessment, overall Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), and head/neck EASI (P less than .0001). Moreover, the rate of improvement in head/neck EASI scores significantly correlated with the rate of improvement in the overall EASI scores (Pearson’s r, 0.61; P less than .01). None of the patients developed herpes simplex, whereas 2 patients developed conjunctivitis.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective chart review of 109 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who initiated dupilumab, of which 60 patients also used tacrolimus ointment. Of these, 20 patients used tacrolimus ointment without any topical steroids.

Disclosures: This work was supported by grants from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.

Source: Matsutani M et al. J Dermatol. 2021 Jun 22. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16039.

Key clinical point: In real world clinical practice, combination of tacrolimus ointment and dupilumab was an effective and safe treatment option for facial atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: On 16 weeks of treatment, a significant decrease was observed in average scores including Investigator’s Global Assessment, overall Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), and head/neck EASI (P less than .0001). Moreover, the rate of improvement in head/neck EASI scores significantly correlated with the rate of improvement in the overall EASI scores (Pearson’s r, 0.61; P less than .01). None of the patients developed herpes simplex, whereas 2 patients developed conjunctivitis.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective chart review of 109 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who initiated dupilumab, of which 60 patients also used tacrolimus ointment. Of these, 20 patients used tacrolimus ointment without any topical steroids.

Disclosures: This work was supported by grants from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.

Source: Matsutani M et al. J Dermatol. 2021 Jun 22. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16039.

Key clinical point: Baricitinib therapy resulted in clinically meaningful improvement in itch severity leading to significantly better quality of life (QoL) in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: By week 16, higher proportion of patients receiving baricitinib 2 mg (25.2%; P less than .0001) and 1 mg (15.9%; P = .0114) vs placebo (5.7%) experienced improvements in itch severity. Higher proportion of patients with vs without itch improvement showed no impact of AD on QoL (P less than .0001).

Study details: Findings are from a post hoc analysis of phase 3 trial, BREEZE-AD5 involving 440 adults with moderate-to-severe AD who received baricitinib 1 mg, 2 mg, or placebo once daily.

Disclosures: This work was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. Some of the authors declared receiving grants, funding, consulting fees, and/or honoraria from and/or serving as board member, speaker, advisor, and/or investigator for various sources including Eli Lilly. Five of the authors declared being employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly.

Source: Lio PA et al. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021 Jun 28. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2021.1914308.

Key clinical point: Baricitinib therapy resulted in clinically meaningful improvement in itch severity leading to significantly better quality of life (QoL) in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: By week 16, higher proportion of patients receiving baricitinib 2 mg (25.2%; P less than .0001) and 1 mg (15.9%; P = .0114) vs placebo (5.7%) experienced improvements in itch severity. Higher proportion of patients with vs without itch improvement showed no impact of AD on QoL (P less than .0001).

Study details: Findings are from a post hoc analysis of phase 3 trial, BREEZE-AD5 involving 440 adults with moderate-to-severe AD who received baricitinib 1 mg, 2 mg, or placebo once daily.

Disclosures: This work was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. Some of the authors declared receiving grants, funding, consulting fees, and/or honoraria from and/or serving as board member, speaker, advisor, and/or investigator for various sources including Eli Lilly. Five of the authors declared being employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly.

Source: Lio PA et al. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021 Jun 28. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2021.1914308.

Key clinical point: Baricitinib therapy resulted in clinically meaningful improvement in itch severity leading to significantly better quality of life (QoL) in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: By week 16, higher proportion of patients receiving baricitinib 2 mg (25.2%; P less than .0001) and 1 mg (15.9%; P = .0114) vs placebo (5.7%) experienced improvements in itch severity. Higher proportion of patients with vs without itch improvement showed no impact of AD on QoL (P less than .0001).

Study details: Findings are from a post hoc analysis of phase 3 trial, BREEZE-AD5 involving 440 adults with moderate-to-severe AD who received baricitinib 1 mg, 2 mg, or placebo once daily.

Disclosures: This work was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. Some of the authors declared receiving grants, funding, consulting fees, and/or honoraria from and/or serving as board member, speaker, advisor, and/or investigator for various sources including Eli Lilly. Five of the authors declared being employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly.

Source: Lio PA et al. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021 Jun 28. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2021.1914308.

Key clinical point: Abrocitinib monotherapy was associated with a rapid and profound relief in atopic dermatitis (AD) itch.

Major finding: A higher proportion of patients receiving abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg vs placebo experienced clinically meaningful itch improvement at week 2 (44.2% and 24.9% vs 5.8%), which continued through week 12 (57.3% and 42.9% vs 16.5%; both P less than .05). Mean percentage reductions in itch scores 24 hours after the first dose were greater for abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg vs placebo which was maintained through week 12 (−56.1 and −42.3 vs −19.5).

Study details: Findings are from a pooled analysis of 1 phase 2b (NCT02780167) and 2 phase 3 (JADE MONO-1 and JADE MONO-2) trials including 942 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who received abrocitinib 200 mg, abrocitinib 100 mg, or placebo.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Pfizer, Inc. Some of the authors declared receiving grants and personal fees and/or serving as consultant, speaker, advisor, and/or principal investigator for various sources including Pfizer. Six of the authors declared being employees and shareholders of Pfizer, Inc.

Source: Kim BS et al. Dermatitis. 2021 Jul 7. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000770.

Key clinical point: Abrocitinib monotherapy was associated with a rapid and profound relief in atopic dermatitis (AD) itch.

Major finding: A higher proportion of patients receiving abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg vs placebo experienced clinically meaningful itch improvement at week 2 (44.2% and 24.9% vs 5.8%), which continued through week 12 (57.3% and 42.9% vs 16.5%; both P less than .05). Mean percentage reductions in itch scores 24 hours after the first dose were greater for abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg vs placebo which was maintained through week 12 (−56.1 and −42.3 vs −19.5).

Study details: Findings are from a pooled analysis of 1 phase 2b (NCT02780167) and 2 phase 3 (JADE MONO-1 and JADE MONO-2) trials including 942 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who received abrocitinib 200 mg, abrocitinib 100 mg, or placebo.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Pfizer, Inc. Some of the authors declared receiving grants and personal fees and/or serving as consultant, speaker, advisor, and/or principal investigator for various sources including Pfizer. Six of the authors declared being employees and shareholders of Pfizer, Inc.

Source: Kim BS et al. Dermatitis. 2021 Jul 7. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000770.

Key clinical point: Abrocitinib monotherapy was associated with a rapid and profound relief in atopic dermatitis (AD) itch.

Major finding: A higher proportion of patients receiving abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg vs placebo experienced clinically meaningful itch improvement at week 2 (44.2% and 24.9% vs 5.8%), which continued through week 12 (57.3% and 42.9% vs 16.5%; both P less than .05). Mean percentage reductions in itch scores 24 hours after the first dose were greater for abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg vs placebo which was maintained through week 12 (−56.1 and −42.3 vs −19.5).

Study details: Findings are from a pooled analysis of 1 phase 2b (NCT02780167) and 2 phase 3 (JADE MONO-1 and JADE MONO-2) trials including 942 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who received abrocitinib 200 mg, abrocitinib 100 mg, or placebo.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Pfizer, Inc. Some of the authors declared receiving grants and personal fees and/or serving as consultant, speaker, advisor, and/or principal investigator for various sources including Pfizer. Six of the authors declared being employees and shareholders of Pfizer, Inc.

Source: Kim BS et al. Dermatitis. 2021 Jul 7. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000770.

Key clinical point: Majority of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) who tested positive for COVID-19 experienced subclinical infection; however, extended treatment with systemic corticosteroids during the pandemic increased chances of COVID-19-associated hospitalization.

Major finding: Most (93.1%) of the COVID-19 infections in patients with AD were subclinical. COVID-19-related complications resulted in 6% hospitalizations, 0.3% mechanical ventilations, and 1.1% deaths. Intake of systemic corticosteroids for 2 or more months during the pandemic was associated with hospitalizations related to COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.96; P = .005). However, mortality associated with COVID-19 was not predicted by AD-related variables.

Study details: Findings are from a nested case-control study including 3618 patients with AD who tested positive for COVID-19.

Disclosures: No funding source was identified. Dr. Cohen declared serving as an advisor, investigator, or speaker for various sources. The other authors had no disclosures.

Source: Kridin K et al. Dermatitis. 2021 Jun 15. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000772.

Key clinical point: Majority of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) who tested positive for COVID-19 experienced subclinical infection; however, extended treatment with systemic corticosteroids during the pandemic increased chances of COVID-19-associated hospitalization.

Major finding: Most (93.1%) of the COVID-19 infections in patients with AD were subclinical. COVID-19-related complications resulted in 6% hospitalizations, 0.3% mechanical ventilations, and 1.1% deaths. Intake of systemic corticosteroids for 2 or more months during the pandemic was associated with hospitalizations related to COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.96; P = .005). However, mortality associated with COVID-19 was not predicted by AD-related variables.

Study details: Findings are from a nested case-control study including 3618 patients with AD who tested positive for COVID-19.

Disclosures: No funding source was identified. Dr. Cohen declared serving as an advisor, investigator, or speaker for various sources. The other authors had no disclosures.

Source: Kridin K et al. Dermatitis. 2021 Jun 15. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000772.

Key clinical point: Majority of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) who tested positive for COVID-19 experienced subclinical infection; however, extended treatment with systemic corticosteroids during the pandemic increased chances of COVID-19-associated hospitalization.

Major finding: Most (93.1%) of the COVID-19 infections in patients with AD were subclinical. COVID-19-related complications resulted in 6% hospitalizations, 0.3% mechanical ventilations, and 1.1% deaths. Intake of systemic corticosteroids for 2 or more months during the pandemic was associated with hospitalizations related to COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.96; P = .005). However, mortality associated with COVID-19 was not predicted by AD-related variables.

Study details: Findings are from a nested case-control study including 3618 patients with AD who tested positive for COVID-19.

Disclosures: No funding source was identified. Dr. Cohen declared serving as an advisor, investigator, or speaker for various sources. The other authors had no disclosures.

Source: Kridin K et al. Dermatitis. 2021 Jun 15. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000772.

Key clinical point: Delgocitinib ointment was effective and safe for up to 56 weeks in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: By the end of initial 4-week treatment, least-squares mean percentage change from baseline in the modified Eczema Area and Severity Index (mEASI) score was significantly greater for delgocitinib vs vehicle (−39.3% vs +10.9%; P less than .001) groups. Improvement in mEASI score continued through the 52-week extension phase. Treatment-related mild adverse events were reported by only 9.7% of patients.

Study details: Findings are from a phase 3 study including 137 Japanese patients aged 2-15 years with mild/moderate/severe AD randomly allocated to either delgocitinib (0.25%) or vehicle ointment for 4 weeks. Eligible patients entered the 52-week extension study phase to receive 0.25% or 0.5% delgocitinib ointment.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Japan Tobacco Inc. and Torii Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Some of the authors declared receiving consulting fees, research grants, speaker honoraria, and/or advisory board honoraria from various sources including Japan Tobacco Inc. Two authors declared being employees of Japan Tobacco Inc.

Source: Nakagawa H et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Jun 9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.014.

Key clinical point: Delgocitinib ointment was effective and safe for up to 56 weeks in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: By the end of initial 4-week treatment, least-squares mean percentage change from baseline in the modified Eczema Area and Severity Index (mEASI) score was significantly greater for delgocitinib vs vehicle (−39.3% vs +10.9%; P less than .001) groups. Improvement in mEASI score continued through the 52-week extension phase. Treatment-related mild adverse events were reported by only 9.7% of patients.

Study details: Findings are from a phase 3 study including 137 Japanese patients aged 2-15 years with mild/moderate/severe AD randomly allocated to either delgocitinib (0.25%) or vehicle ointment for 4 weeks. Eligible patients entered the 52-week extension study phase to receive 0.25% or 0.5% delgocitinib ointment.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Japan Tobacco Inc. and Torii Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Some of the authors declared receiving consulting fees, research grants, speaker honoraria, and/or advisory board honoraria from various sources including Japan Tobacco Inc. Two authors declared being employees of Japan Tobacco Inc.

Source: Nakagawa H et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Jun 9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.014.

Key clinical point: Delgocitinib ointment was effective and safe for up to 56 weeks in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: By the end of initial 4-week treatment, least-squares mean percentage change from baseline in the modified Eczema Area and Severity Index (mEASI) score was significantly greater for delgocitinib vs vehicle (−39.3% vs +10.9%; P less than .001) groups. Improvement in mEASI score continued through the 52-week extension phase. Treatment-related mild adverse events were reported by only 9.7% of patients.

Study details: Findings are from a phase 3 study including 137 Japanese patients aged 2-15 years with mild/moderate/severe AD randomly allocated to either delgocitinib (0.25%) or vehicle ointment for 4 weeks. Eligible patients entered the 52-week extension study phase to receive 0.25% or 0.5% delgocitinib ointment.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Japan Tobacco Inc. and Torii Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Some of the authors declared receiving consulting fees, research grants, speaker honoraria, and/or advisory board honoraria from various sources including Japan Tobacco Inc. Two authors declared being employees of Japan Tobacco Inc.

Source: Nakagawa H et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Jun 9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.014.

Key clinical point: A topical cream containing cultured autologous antimicrobial-producing coagulase-negative strain of Staphylococcus (CoNS-AM+) safely decreased Staphylococcus aureus colonization and improved disease severity in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At the end of treatment, CoNS-AM+ reduced S. aureus colonization on lesioned skin by 99.2% compared with the vehicle (mean of log10 ratio to baseline, −1.702 vs 0.671; P = .01), which persisted even 4 days after treatment (P = .03). On day 11, Eczema Area and Severity Index scores improved significantly in patients receiving CoNS-AM+ vs vehicle (P = .04). No serious adverse events were recorded in either group.

Study details: This was a double-blind, vehicle-controlled randomized clinical trial of 11 adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD randomly assigned to either CoNS-AM+ (n=5) or the vehicle (n=6).

Disclosures: This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Health. Dr. Nakatsuji, Dr. Gallo, and Dr. Shafiq reported receiving grants and/or consulting fees from and holding patent/pending patent, and/or holding equity in various sources.

Source: Nakatsuji T et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Jun 16. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.1311.

Key clinical point: A topical cream containing cultured autologous antimicrobial-producing coagulase-negative strain of Staphylococcus (CoNS-AM+) safely decreased Staphylococcus aureus colonization and improved disease severity in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At the end of treatment, CoNS-AM+ reduced S. aureus colonization on lesioned skin by 99.2% compared with the vehicle (mean of log10 ratio to baseline, −1.702 vs 0.671; P = .01), which persisted even 4 days after treatment (P = .03). On day 11, Eczema Area and Severity Index scores improved significantly in patients receiving CoNS-AM+ vs vehicle (P = .04). No serious adverse events were recorded in either group.

Study details: This was a double-blind, vehicle-controlled randomized clinical trial of 11 adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD randomly assigned to either CoNS-AM+ (n=5) or the vehicle (n=6).

Disclosures: This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Health. Dr. Nakatsuji, Dr. Gallo, and Dr. Shafiq reported receiving grants and/or consulting fees from and holding patent/pending patent, and/or holding equity in various sources.

Source: Nakatsuji T et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Jun 16. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.1311.

Key clinical point: A topical cream containing cultured autologous antimicrobial-producing coagulase-negative strain of Staphylococcus (CoNS-AM+) safely decreased Staphylococcus aureus colonization and improved disease severity in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At the end of treatment, CoNS-AM+ reduced S. aureus colonization on lesioned skin by 99.2% compared with the vehicle (mean of log10 ratio to baseline, −1.702 vs 0.671; P = .01), which persisted even 4 days after treatment (P = .03). On day 11, Eczema Area and Severity Index scores improved significantly in patients receiving CoNS-AM+ vs vehicle (P = .04). No serious adverse events were recorded in either group.

Study details: This was a double-blind, vehicle-controlled randomized clinical trial of 11 adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD randomly assigned to either CoNS-AM+ (n=5) or the vehicle (n=6).

Disclosures: This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Health. Dr. Nakatsuji, Dr. Gallo, and Dr. Shafiq reported receiving grants and/or consulting fees from and holding patent/pending patent, and/or holding equity in various sources.

Source: Nakatsuji T et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Jun 16. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.1311.

With COVID, the fun never ends

Welcome to America’s favorite pandemic-themed game show! Let’s play Covidiot Proof! And now, here’s your host, the lovely and talented Anthony Grouchy!

sabelskaya/iStock/Getty Images Plus

Tony: Hello everyone! Our first category today is America or [blank], and the first clue is for you, Don. This country requires “individuals to use a health pass to patronize indoor establishments such as restaurants, bars, nightclubs and cinemas.”

Don: Freedom-loving Americans would never stand for that, Tony, so I’m going to say Greece.

Tony: That’s correct, Don. One hundred points for you. Okay Joe, here’s your clue: In this country, some people wear disguises to get a COVID vaccination so their friends and families won’t find out.

Joe: Sounds like communism to me, Tony. I’ll say Cuba.

Tony: Sorry Joe, that’s incorrect. Don?

Don: The friends and families sound like freedom-loving Americans, so it must be America.

Tony: It is America. Missouri, to be exact. And now, one last question for both of you to win the game. True or false? Did the pastor of a church in Tennessee say that mask-wearers would be kicked out of the building because “I am not playing these Democrat games up in this church”?

Joe: That’s fake news, Tony. It’s gotta be false.

Tony: Incorrect! It’s absolutely true. That means today’s winner is … Joe? Yes, I’m being told that Tennessee goes to Joe.

Don: That’s bulls#&@! I won this thing! I’ll see you in court!
 

More money, more life

Does it seem to you that the wealthy live forever, while the less financially comfortable live shorter lives? If you answered, yes, it turns out that you’re right.

utah778/Thinkstock

Researchers analyzed the effect of net worth at midlife with mortality. To take out genetic differences among the sample of 5,400 adults aged 46 years, the investigators also studied a subset of 2,490 twin and sibling pairs.

“The within-family association provides strong evidence that an association between wealth accumulation and life expectancy exists, because comparing siblings within the same family to each other controls for all of the life experience and biology that they share,” said coauthor Eric Finegood of Northwestern University, Chicago.

But what if one sibling has a history of cancer, heart disease, or other health conditions? The cost of treatment and employment limitations could affect someone’s ability to stack their wealth, right? Absolutely. The researchers took that into account and looked at only healthy individuals and found the same results. More money, longer life.

We have the policies and programs in place for heart health, diabetes prevention, and smoking cessation, as they are seen as major threats to public health. So why not do the same for financial security? A low bank account may just be more harmful.
 

Holding the ‘health care and wellness’ gun

Cigarettes are not good for us. We know this.

seanika/ThinkStock

It’s, therefore, not surprising to learn that a business has requested for a U.K. ban on the sale of cigarettes by 2030. However, when that someone turns out to be the CEO of Philip Morris International, tobacco company and maker of Marlboro cigarettes, things get a little confusing.

Banning cigarettes, according to Jacek Olczak, would reduce confusion among consumers, many of whom feel that the alternatives are worse for their health. His company can “see the world without cigarettes ... and actually, the sooner it happens, the better it is for everyone.” A truly noble sentiment from the CEO of a large tobacco company. Nothing nefarious going on here.

Philip Morris International is actually leaning hard into nonsmoking means of tobacco consumption, even going so far as to brand itself a “health care and wellness company” on a mission to “unsmoke the world.” And if those aren’t egregious business euphemisms, we don’t know what is.

Of course, for all the completely believable and sincere rhetoric, the fact is that Marlboros are still on the shelves. Philip Morris is still making and advertising them. If their concern was genuine, why wouldn’t they just stop manufacturing them now?

So, we ask ourselves if this a selfless act of kindness or is it an unscrupulous corporate act to get a leg up on their competitors? We’ll leave it up to the readers to decide.

Okay, we lied, it’s the second one.
 

Autopsy of the living dead

Imagine the absolute terror you’d feel if you opened your eyes to bright, blinding white lights only to see a bone saw 3 inches from your forehead and getting closer by the second. Horrifying for you, certainly, but think about the poor pathologist behind the saw who probably thought a zombie apocalypse was coming. This was close to being a reality for a 29-year-old prisoner at the Asturias Central Penitentiary in Spain.

Gonzalo Montoya Jiménez was discovered in his cell unresponsive. Three physicians examined him and found he was showing signs of death, such as cyanosis and rigor mortis. Mr. Jiménez was processed like any other body and was sent, in a body bag, to a hospital mortuary, where he spent time in a freezer for body preservation. Just before he was due for his autopsy, he began showing signs of life.

It’s not completely clear why this happened to poor Mr. Jiménez, but it was reported that he wasn’t feeling well the day before and that he has epilepsy. Hospital officials suggested he may have been cataleptic, possibly because he had trouble adhering to his medication schedule.

Mr. Jiménez was moved to another hospital under armed guard after coming back to life and regained consciousness after a day or so. Talk about cheating death.
 

With COVID, the fun never ends

Welcome to America’s favorite pandemic-themed game show! Let’s play Covidiot Proof! And now, here’s your host, the lovely and talented Anthony Grouchy!

sabelskaya/iStock/Getty Images Plus

Tony: Hello everyone! Our first category today is America or [blank], and the first clue is for you, Don. This country requires “individuals to use a health pass to patronize indoor establishments such as restaurants, bars, nightclubs and cinemas.”

Don: Freedom-loving Americans would never stand for that, Tony, so I’m going to say Greece.

Tony: That’s correct, Don. One hundred points for you. Okay Joe, here’s your clue: In this country, some people wear disguises to get a COVID vaccination so their friends and families won’t find out.

Joe: Sounds like communism to me, Tony. I’ll say Cuba.

Tony: Sorry Joe, that’s incorrect. Don?

Don: The friends and families sound like freedom-loving Americans, so it must be America.

Tony: It is America. Missouri, to be exact. And now, one last question for both of you to win the game. True or false? Did the pastor of a church in Tennessee say that mask-wearers would be kicked out of the building because “I am not playing these Democrat games up in this church”?

Joe: That’s fake news, Tony. It’s gotta be false.

Tony: Incorrect! It’s absolutely true. That means today’s winner is … Joe? Yes, I’m being told that Tennessee goes to Joe.

Don: That’s bulls#&@! I won this thing! I’ll see you in court!
 

More money, more life

Does it seem to you that the wealthy live forever, while the less financially comfortable live shorter lives? If you answered, yes, it turns out that you’re right.

utah778/Thinkstock

Researchers analyzed the effect of net worth at midlife with mortality. To take out genetic differences among the sample of 5,400 adults aged 46 years, the investigators also studied a subset of 2,490 twin and sibling pairs.

“The within-family association provides strong evidence that an association between wealth accumulation and life expectancy exists, because comparing siblings within the same family to each other controls for all of the life experience and biology that they share,” said coauthor Eric Finegood of Northwestern University, Chicago.

But what if one sibling has a history of cancer, heart disease, or other health conditions? The cost of treatment and employment limitations could affect someone’s ability to stack their wealth, right? Absolutely. The researchers took that into account and looked at only healthy individuals and found the same results. More money, longer life.

We have the policies and programs in place for heart health, diabetes prevention, and smoking cessation, as they are seen as major threats to public health. So why not do the same for financial security? A low bank account may just be more harmful.
 

Holding the ‘health care and wellness’ gun

Cigarettes are not good for us. We know this.

seanika/ThinkStock

It’s, therefore, not surprising to learn that a business has requested for a U.K. ban on the sale of cigarettes by 2030. However, when that someone turns out to be the CEO of Philip Morris International, tobacco company and maker of Marlboro cigarettes, things get a little confusing.

Banning cigarettes, according to Jacek Olczak, would reduce confusion among consumers, many of whom feel that the alternatives are worse for their health. His company can “see the world without cigarettes ... and actually, the sooner it happens, the better it is for everyone.” A truly noble sentiment from the CEO of a large tobacco company. Nothing nefarious going on here.

Philip Morris International is actually leaning hard into nonsmoking means of tobacco consumption, even going so far as to brand itself a “health care and wellness company” on a mission to “unsmoke the world.” And if those aren’t egregious business euphemisms, we don’t know what is.

Of course, for all the completely believable and sincere rhetoric, the fact is that Marlboros are still on the shelves. Philip Morris is still making and advertising them. If their concern was genuine, why wouldn’t they just stop manufacturing them now?

So, we ask ourselves if this a selfless act of kindness or is it an unscrupulous corporate act to get a leg up on their competitors? We’ll leave it up to the readers to decide.

Okay, we lied, it’s the second one.
 

Autopsy of the living dead

Imagine the absolute terror you’d feel if you opened your eyes to bright, blinding white lights only to see a bone saw 3 inches from your forehead and getting closer by the second. Horrifying for you, certainly, but think about the poor pathologist behind the saw who probably thought a zombie apocalypse was coming. This was close to being a reality for a 29-year-old prisoner at the Asturias Central Penitentiary in Spain.

Gonzalo Montoya Jiménez was discovered in his cell unresponsive. Three physicians examined him and found he was showing signs of death, such as cyanosis and rigor mortis. Mr. Jiménez was processed like any other body and was sent, in a body bag, to a hospital mortuary, where he spent time in a freezer for body preservation. Just before he was due for his autopsy, he began showing signs of life.

It’s not completely clear why this happened to poor Mr. Jiménez, but it was reported that he wasn’t feeling well the day before and that he has epilepsy. Hospital officials suggested he may have been cataleptic, possibly because he had trouble adhering to his medication schedule.

Mr. Jiménez was moved to another hospital under armed guard after coming back to life and regained consciousness after a day or so. Talk about cheating death.
 

With COVID, the fun never ends

Welcome to America’s favorite pandemic-themed game show! Let’s play Covidiot Proof! And now, here’s your host, the lovely and talented Anthony Grouchy!

sabelskaya/iStock/Getty Images Plus

Tony: Hello everyone! Our first category today is America or [blank], and the first clue is for you, Don. This country requires “individuals to use a health pass to patronize indoor establishments such as restaurants, bars, nightclubs and cinemas.”

Don: Freedom-loving Americans would never stand for that, Tony, so I’m going to say Greece.

Tony: That’s correct, Don. One hundred points for you. Okay Joe, here’s your clue: In this country, some people wear disguises to get a COVID vaccination so their friends and families won’t find out.

Joe: Sounds like communism to me, Tony. I’ll say Cuba.

Tony: Sorry Joe, that’s incorrect. Don?

Don: The friends and families sound like freedom-loving Americans, so it must be America.

Tony: It is America. Missouri, to be exact. And now, one last question for both of you to win the game. True or false? Did the pastor of a church in Tennessee say that mask-wearers would be kicked out of the building because “I am not playing these Democrat games up in this church”?

Joe: That’s fake news, Tony. It’s gotta be false.

Tony: Incorrect! It’s absolutely true. That means today’s winner is … Joe? Yes, I’m being told that Tennessee goes to Joe.

Don: That’s bulls#&@! I won this thing! I’ll see you in court!
 

More money, more life

Does it seem to you that the wealthy live forever, while the less financially comfortable live shorter lives? If you answered, yes, it turns out that you’re right.

utah778/Thinkstock

Researchers analyzed the effect of net worth at midlife with mortality. To take out genetic differences among the sample of 5,400 adults aged 46 years, the investigators also studied a subset of 2,490 twin and sibling pairs.

“The within-family association provides strong evidence that an association between wealth accumulation and life expectancy exists, because comparing siblings within the same family to each other controls for all of the life experience and biology that they share,” said coauthor Eric Finegood of Northwestern University, Chicago.

But what if one sibling has a history of cancer, heart disease, or other health conditions? The cost of treatment and employment limitations could affect someone’s ability to stack their wealth, right? Absolutely. The researchers took that into account and looked at only healthy individuals and found the same results. More money, longer life.

We have the policies and programs in place for heart health, diabetes prevention, and smoking cessation, as they are seen as major threats to public health. So why not do the same for financial security? A low bank account may just be more harmful.
 

Holding the ‘health care and wellness’ gun

Cigarettes are not good for us. We know this.

seanika/ThinkStock

It’s, therefore, not surprising to learn that a business has requested for a U.K. ban on the sale of cigarettes by 2030. However, when that someone turns out to be the CEO of Philip Morris International, tobacco company and maker of Marlboro cigarettes, things get a little confusing.

Banning cigarettes, according to Jacek Olczak, would reduce confusion among consumers, many of whom feel that the alternatives are worse for their health. His company can “see the world without cigarettes ... and actually, the sooner it happens, the better it is for everyone.” A truly noble sentiment from the CEO of a large tobacco company. Nothing nefarious going on here.

Philip Morris International is actually leaning hard into nonsmoking means of tobacco consumption, even going so far as to brand itself a “health care and wellness company” on a mission to “unsmoke the world.” And if those aren’t egregious business euphemisms, we don’t know what is.

Of course, for all the completely believable and sincere rhetoric, the fact is that Marlboros are still on the shelves. Philip Morris is still making and advertising them. If their concern was genuine, why wouldn’t they just stop manufacturing them now?

So, we ask ourselves if this a selfless act of kindness or is it an unscrupulous corporate act to get a leg up on their competitors? We’ll leave it up to the readers to decide.

Okay, we lied, it’s the second one.
 

Autopsy of the living dead

Imagine the absolute terror you’d feel if you opened your eyes to bright, blinding white lights only to see a bone saw 3 inches from your forehead and getting closer by the second. Horrifying for you, certainly, but think about the poor pathologist behind the saw who probably thought a zombie apocalypse was coming. This was close to being a reality for a 29-year-old prisoner at the Asturias Central Penitentiary in Spain.

Gonzalo Montoya Jiménez was discovered in his cell unresponsive. Three physicians examined him and found he was showing signs of death, such as cyanosis and rigor mortis. Mr. Jiménez was processed like any other body and was sent, in a body bag, to a hospital mortuary, where he spent time in a freezer for body preservation. Just before he was due for his autopsy, he began showing signs of life.

It’s not completely clear why this happened to poor Mr. Jiménez, but it was reported that he wasn’t feeling well the day before and that he has epilepsy. Hospital officials suggested he may have been cataleptic, possibly because he had trouble adhering to his medication schedule.

Mr. Jiménez was moved to another hospital under armed guard after coming back to life and regained consciousness after a day or so. Talk about cheating death.
 

When used for appropriate patients, MRI imaging is helpful in congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN) management and may help predict neurologic outcomes or drive neurosurgical intervention, results from a small multi-institutional study showed.

“The majority of congenital nevi are considered low risk for cutaneous and/or systemic complications,” Holly Neale said at the annual meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology. “However, a subset of children born with higher-risk congenital nevi require close monitoring, as some features of congenital nevi have been associated with cutaneous melanoma, central nervous system melanoma, melanin in the brain or spine, and structural irregularities in the brain or spine. It’s important to understand which congenital nevi are considered higher risk in order to guide management and counseling decisions.”

One major management decision is to do a screening magnetic resonance image of the CNS to evaluate for neurologic involvement, said Ms. Neale, a fourth-year medical student at the University of Massachusetts, Worcester. Prior studies have shown that congenital nevi that are bigger than 20 cm, posterior axial location, and having more than one congenital nevus may predict CNS abnormalities, while recent guidelines from experts in the field suggest that any child with more than one congenital nevus at birth undergo screening MRI.

“However, guidelines are evolving, and more data is required to better understand the CNS abnormalities and patient outcomes for children with congenital nevi,” said Ms. Neale, who spent the past year as a pediatric dermatology research fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

To address this knowledge gap, she and colleagues at the University of Massachusetts, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Boston Children’s Hospital performed a retrospective chart review between Jan. 1, 2009, and Dec. 31, 2019, of individuals ages 18 and younger who had an MRI of the brain or spine with at least one dermatologist-diagnosed nevus as identified via key words in the medical record. Of the 909 patients screened, 46 met inclusion criteria, evenly split between males and females.

The most common location of the largest nevus was the trunk (in 41% of patients), followed by lesions that spanned multiple regions. More than one-third of patients had giant nevi (greater than 40 cm).

“The majority of images were considered nonconcerning, which includes normal, benign, or other findings such as trauma related, infectious, or orthopedic, which we did not classify as abnormal as it did not guide our study question,” Ms. Neale said. Specifically, 8% of spine images and 27% of brain images were considered “concerning,” defined as any finding that prompted further workup or monitoring, which includes findings concerning for melanin.

The most common brain finding was melanin (in eight children), and one child with brain melanin also had findings suggestive of melanin in the thoracic spine. The most common finding in spine MRIs was fatty filum (in four children), requiring intervention for tethering in only one individual. No cases of cutaneous melanoma developed during the study period, and only one patient with abnormal imaging had CNS melanoma, which was fatal.

All patients with findings suggestive of CNS melanin had more than four nevi present at birth, which is in line with current imaging screening guidelines. In addition, children with concerning imaging had higher rates of death, neurodevelopmental problems, seizures, and neurosurgery, compared with their counterparts with unremarkable imaging findings. Describing preliminary analyses, Ms. Neale said that a chi square analysis was performed to test statistical significance of these differences, “and neurosurgery was the only variable that children with concerning imaging were significantly more likely to experience, although sample size limits detection for the other variables.”

The authors concluded that MRI is a helpful tool when used in the appropriate clinical context for the management of congenital nevi. “As more children undergo imaging, we may discover more nonmelanin abnormalities,” she said.

Joseph M. Lam, MD, who was asked to comment on the study, said that the increased risk of CNS melanin in patients with larger lesions and in those with multiple lesions confirms previous reports.

“It is interesting to note that some patients with nonconcerning imaging results still had neurodevelopmental problems and seizures, albeit at a lower rate than those with concerning imaging results,” said Dr. Lam, a pediatric dermatologist at British Columbia Children’s Hospital, Vancouver. “The lack of a control group for comparison of rates of neurological sequelae, such as NDP, seizures and nonmelanin structural anomalies, limits the generalizability of the findings. However, this is a nice study that helps us understand better the CNS anomalies in CMN.”

Ms. Neale acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the lack of a control group without CMN, the small number of patients, the potential for referral bias, and its retrospective design. Also, the proximity of the study period does not allow for chronic follow-up and detection of the development of melanoma or other problems in the future.

Ms. Neale and associates reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Lam disclosed that he has received speaker fees from Pierre Fabre.

[email protected]

When used for appropriate patients, MRI imaging is helpful in congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN) management and may help predict neurologic outcomes or drive neurosurgical intervention, results from a small multi-institutional study showed.

“The majority of congenital nevi are considered low risk for cutaneous and/or systemic complications,” Holly Neale said at the annual meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology. “However, a subset of children born with higher-risk congenital nevi require close monitoring, as some features of congenital nevi have been associated with cutaneous melanoma, central nervous system melanoma, melanin in the brain or spine, and structural irregularities in the brain or spine. It’s important to understand which congenital nevi are considered higher risk in order to guide management and counseling decisions.”

One major management decision is to do a screening magnetic resonance image of the CNS to evaluate for neurologic involvement, said Ms. Neale, a fourth-year medical student at the University of Massachusetts, Worcester. Prior studies have shown that congenital nevi that are bigger than 20 cm, posterior axial location, and having more than one congenital nevus may predict CNS abnormalities, while recent guidelines from experts in the field suggest that any child with more than one congenital nevus at birth undergo screening MRI.

“However, guidelines are evolving, and more data is required to better understand the CNS abnormalities and patient outcomes for children with congenital nevi,” said Ms. Neale, who spent the past year as a pediatric dermatology research fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

To address this knowledge gap, she and colleagues at the University of Massachusetts, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Boston Children’s Hospital performed a retrospective chart review between Jan. 1, 2009, and Dec. 31, 2019, of individuals ages 18 and younger who had an MRI of the brain or spine with at least one dermatologist-diagnosed nevus as identified via key words in the medical record. Of the 909 patients screened, 46 met inclusion criteria, evenly split between males and females.

The most common location of the largest nevus was the trunk (in 41% of patients), followed by lesions that spanned multiple regions. More than one-third of patients had giant nevi (greater than 40 cm).

“The majority of images were considered nonconcerning, which includes normal, benign, or other findings such as trauma related, infectious, or orthopedic, which we did not classify as abnormal as it did not guide our study question,” Ms. Neale said. Specifically, 8% of spine images and 27% of brain images were considered “concerning,” defined as any finding that prompted further workup or monitoring, which includes findings concerning for melanin.

The most common brain finding was melanin (in eight children), and one child with brain melanin also had findings suggestive of melanin in the thoracic spine. The most common finding in spine MRIs was fatty filum (in four children), requiring intervention for tethering in only one individual. No cases of cutaneous melanoma developed during the study period, and only one patient with abnormal imaging had CNS melanoma, which was fatal.

All patients with findings suggestive of CNS melanin had more than four nevi present at birth, which is in line with current imaging screening guidelines. In addition, children with concerning imaging had higher rates of death, neurodevelopmental problems, seizures, and neurosurgery, compared with their counterparts with unremarkable imaging findings. Describing preliminary analyses, Ms. Neale said that a chi square analysis was performed to test statistical significance of these differences, “and neurosurgery was the only variable that children with concerning imaging were significantly more likely to experience, although sample size limits detection for the other variables.”

The authors concluded that MRI is a helpful tool when used in the appropriate clinical context for the management of congenital nevi. “As more children undergo imaging, we may discover more nonmelanin abnormalities,” she said.

Joseph M. Lam, MD, who was asked to comment on the study, said that the increased risk of CNS melanin in patients with larger lesions and in those with multiple lesions confirms previous reports.

“It is interesting to note that some patients with nonconcerning imaging results still had neurodevelopmental problems and seizures, albeit at a lower rate than those with concerning imaging results,” said Dr. Lam, a pediatric dermatologist at British Columbia Children’s Hospital, Vancouver. “The lack of a control group for comparison of rates of neurological sequelae, such as NDP, seizures and nonmelanin structural anomalies, limits the generalizability of the findings. However, this is a nice study that helps us understand better the CNS anomalies in CMN.”

Ms. Neale acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the lack of a control group without CMN, the small number of patients, the potential for referral bias, and its retrospective design. Also, the proximity of the study period does not allow for chronic follow-up and detection of the development of melanoma or other problems in the future.

Ms. Neale and associates reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Lam disclosed that he has received speaker fees from Pierre Fabre.

[email protected]

When used for appropriate patients, MRI imaging is helpful in congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN) management and may help predict neurologic outcomes or drive neurosurgical intervention, results from a small multi-institutional study showed.

“The majority of congenital nevi are considered low risk for cutaneous and/or systemic complications,” Holly Neale said at the annual meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology. “However, a subset of children born with higher-risk congenital nevi require close monitoring, as some features of congenital nevi have been associated with cutaneous melanoma, central nervous system melanoma, melanin in the brain or spine, and structural irregularities in the brain or spine. It’s important to understand which congenital nevi are considered higher risk in order to guide management and counseling decisions.”

One major management decision is to do a screening magnetic resonance image of the CNS to evaluate for neurologic involvement, said Ms. Neale, a fourth-year medical student at the University of Massachusetts, Worcester. Prior studies have shown that congenital nevi that are bigger than 20 cm, posterior axial location, and having more than one congenital nevus may predict CNS abnormalities, while recent guidelines from experts in the field suggest that any child with more than one congenital nevus at birth undergo screening MRI.

“However, guidelines are evolving, and more data is required to better understand the CNS abnormalities and patient outcomes for children with congenital nevi,” said Ms. Neale, who spent the past year as a pediatric dermatology research fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

To address this knowledge gap, she and colleagues at the University of Massachusetts, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Boston Children’s Hospital performed a retrospective chart review between Jan. 1, 2009, and Dec. 31, 2019, of individuals ages 18 and younger who had an MRI of the brain or spine with at least one dermatologist-diagnosed nevus as identified via key words in the medical record. Of the 909 patients screened, 46 met inclusion criteria, evenly split between males and females.

The most common location of the largest nevus was the trunk (in 41% of patients), followed by lesions that spanned multiple regions. More than one-third of patients had giant nevi (greater than 40 cm).

“The majority of images were considered nonconcerning, which includes normal, benign, or other findings such as trauma related, infectious, or orthopedic, which we did not classify as abnormal as it did not guide our study question,” Ms. Neale said. Specifically, 8% of spine images and 27% of brain images were considered “concerning,” defined as any finding that prompted further workup or monitoring, which includes findings concerning for melanin.

The most common brain finding was melanin (in eight children), and one child with brain melanin also had findings suggestive of melanin in the thoracic spine. The most common finding in spine MRIs was fatty filum (in four children), requiring intervention for tethering in only one individual. No cases of cutaneous melanoma developed during the study period, and only one patient with abnormal imaging had CNS melanoma, which was fatal.

All patients with findings suggestive of CNS melanin had more than four nevi present at birth, which is in line with current imaging screening guidelines. In addition, children with concerning imaging had higher rates of death, neurodevelopmental problems, seizures, and neurosurgery, compared with their counterparts with unremarkable imaging findings. Describing preliminary analyses, Ms. Neale said that a chi square analysis was performed to test statistical significance of these differences, “and neurosurgery was the only variable that children with concerning imaging were significantly more likely to experience, although sample size limits detection for the other variables.”

The authors concluded that MRI is a helpful tool when used in the appropriate clinical context for the management of congenital nevi. “As more children undergo imaging, we may discover more nonmelanin abnormalities,” she said.

Joseph M. Lam, MD, who was asked to comment on the study, said that the increased risk of CNS melanin in patients with larger lesions and in those with multiple lesions confirms previous reports.

“It is interesting to note that some patients with nonconcerning imaging results still had neurodevelopmental problems and seizures, albeit at a lower rate than those with concerning imaging results,” said Dr. Lam, a pediatric dermatologist at British Columbia Children’s Hospital, Vancouver. “The lack of a control group for comparison of rates of neurological sequelae, such as NDP, seizures and nonmelanin structural anomalies, limits the generalizability of the findings. However, this is a nice study that helps us understand better the CNS anomalies in CMN.”

Ms. Neale acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the lack of a control group without CMN, the small number of patients, the potential for referral bias, and its retrospective design. Also, the proximity of the study period does not allow for chronic follow-up and detection of the development of melanoma or other problems in the future.

Ms. Neale and associates reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Lam disclosed that he has received speaker fees from Pierre Fabre.

[email protected]

The environmental impact of virtual isotretinoin management at West Virginia University Hospital (WVUH) in 2020 has been estimated in a new study: A reduction of 5,137 kg of greenhouse gas emissions in carbon dioxide equivalents.

In what they say is “one of the first studies to evaluate the environmental impact of any aspect of dermatology,” the authors of the retrospective cross-sectional study identified patients who had virtual visits for isotretinoin management between March 25 and May 29, 2020, – the period during which all such visits were conducted virtually in keeping with hospital recommendations to minimize the spread of COVID-19.

The investigators, from the department of dermatology and the department of civil and environmental engineering at West Virginia University, Morgantown, then counted the number of virtual visits that occurred during this period and through Dec. 1, 2020, (175 virtual visits), calculated the distance patients would have traveled round-trip had these visits been in-person, and converted miles saved into the environmental impact using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Federal Highway Administration data and relevant EPA standards.

Most patients had elected to continue virtual visits after May 29, the point at which patients were given the option to return to the WVUH clinic. (Patients who initiated treatment during the 2-month identification period were not included.)

The investigators determined that virtual management of isotretinoin saved a median of 37.8 miles per visit during the study period of March 25 to Dec. 1, and estimated that the virtual visits reduced total travel by 14,450 miles. For the analysis, patients were assumed to use light-duty vehicles.

In addition to calculating the reduction in emissions during the study period (5,137 kg of CO₂equivalents) they used patient census data from 2019 to 2020 and data from the study period to project the mileage – and the associated emissions – that would be saved annually if all in-person visits for isotretinoin management occurred virtually.

Their calculation for a projected emissions reduction with 1 year of all-virtual isotretinoin management was 49,400 kg of greenhouse gas emissions in CO₂equivalents. This is the emission load released when 24,690 kg of coal are burned or 6.3 million smartphones are charged, the researchers wrote.

“Considering that more than 1,000,000 prescriptions of isotretinoin are authorized annually in the United States, the environmental impact could be magnified if virtual delivery of isotretinoin care is adopted on a national scale,” they commented.“Given the serious consequences of global climate change, analysis of the environmental impact of all fields of medicine, including dermatology, is warranted,” they added.

The reduced greenhouse gas emissions are “definitely [being taken] into consideration for future decisions about virtual visits” in the department of dermatology, said Zachary Zinn, MD, residency director and associate professor in the department of dermatology at West Virginia University, Morgantown, who is the senior author of the study. “The main benefit of virtual care in my opinion,” he said in an interview, “is the potential to reduce our carbon footprint.”

Justin Lee, MD, an intern at WVU and the study’s first author, said that the research team was motivated to think about how they “could reduce the negative environmental impact of practicing dermatology” after they read a paper about the environmental impact of endoscopy, written by a gastroenterologist.

In the study, no pregnancies occurred and monthly tests were performed, but “formal assessment of pregnancy risk with virtual isotretinoin management would be warranted,” Dr. Lee and coauthors wrote, noting too that, while no differences were seen with respect to isotretinoin side effects, these were not formally analyzed.

Dr. Zinn said that he and colleagues at WVUH are currently conducting clinical trials to assess the quality and efficacy of virtual care for patients with acne, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis. Delivering care virtually “will be easier to do if there are data supporting [its] quality and efficacy,” he said. Rosacea is another condition that may be amendable to virtual care, he noted.

Meanwhile, he said, isotretinoin management is “well suited” for virtual visits. When initiating isotretinoin treatment, Dr. Zinn now “proactively inquires” if patients would like to pursue their follow-up visits virtually. “I’ll note that it will save the time and decrease the burden of travel, including the financial cost as well as the environmental cost of travel,” he said, estimating that about half of their management visits are currently virtual.

Asked about the study, Misha Rosenbach, MD, associate professor of dermatology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, said the reduced carbon footprint calculated by the researchers and its downstream health benefits “should be taken into consideration by [dermatology] departments, insurers and policymakers” when making decisions about teledermatology.

While environmental impact is “not something I think most institutions are considering for virtual versus in-person care, they should be. And some are,” said Dr. Rosenbach, a founder and cochair of the American Academy of Dermatology Expert Resource Group for Climate Change and Environmental Issues.

Limitations of the study include the generalizability of the results. The impact of virtual isotretinoin management “may be less in predominantly urban areas” than it is in predominately rural West Virginia, the study authors note. And in the case of West Virginia, travel to a local laboratory and pharmacy offsets some of the environmental benefits for the virtual care, they noted. Such travel wasn’t accounted for in the study, but it was found to be a fraction of travel to the WVU hospital clinic. (Patients traveled a median of 5.8 miles to a lab 2.4 times from March 25 to Dec. 1, 2020.)

Dr. Lee will start his dermatology residency at WVU next year. The study was funded by a grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation. The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest, according to Dr. Lee.

The environmental impact of virtual isotretinoin management at West Virginia University Hospital (WVUH) in 2020 has been estimated in a new study: A reduction of 5,137 kg of greenhouse gas emissions in carbon dioxide equivalents.

In what they say is “one of the first studies to evaluate the environmental impact of any aspect of dermatology,” the authors of the retrospective cross-sectional study identified patients who had virtual visits for isotretinoin management between March 25 and May 29, 2020, – the period during which all such visits were conducted virtually in keeping with hospital recommendations to minimize the spread of COVID-19.

The investigators, from the department of dermatology and the department of civil and environmental engineering at West Virginia University, Morgantown, then counted the number of virtual visits that occurred during this period and through Dec. 1, 2020, (175 virtual visits), calculated the distance patients would have traveled round-trip had these visits been in-person, and converted miles saved into the environmental impact using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Federal Highway Administration data and relevant EPA standards.

Most patients had elected to continue virtual visits after May 29, the point at which patients were given the option to return to the WVUH clinic. (Patients who initiated treatment during the 2-month identification period were not included.)

The investigators determined that virtual management of isotretinoin saved a median of 37.8 miles per visit during the study period of March 25 to Dec. 1, and estimated that the virtual visits reduced total travel by 14,450 miles. For the analysis, patients were assumed to use light-duty vehicles.

In addition to calculating the reduction in emissions during the study period (5,137 kg of CO₂equivalents) they used patient census data from 2019 to 2020 and data from the study period to project the mileage – and the associated emissions – that would be saved annually if all in-person visits for isotretinoin management occurred virtually.

Their calculation for a projected emissions reduction with 1 year of all-virtual isotretinoin management was 49,400 kg of greenhouse gas emissions in CO₂equivalents. This is the emission load released when 24,690 kg of coal are burned or 6.3 million smartphones are charged, the researchers wrote.

“Considering that more than 1,000,000 prescriptions of isotretinoin are authorized annually in the United States, the environmental impact could be magnified if virtual delivery of isotretinoin care is adopted on a national scale,” they commented.“Given the serious consequences of global climate change, analysis of the environmental impact of all fields of medicine, including dermatology, is warranted,” they added.

The reduced greenhouse gas emissions are “definitely [being taken] into consideration for future decisions about virtual visits” in the department of dermatology, said Zachary Zinn, MD, residency director and associate professor in the department of dermatology at West Virginia University, Morgantown, who is the senior author of the study. “The main benefit of virtual care in my opinion,” he said in an interview, “is the potential to reduce our carbon footprint.”

Justin Lee, MD, an intern at WVU and the study’s first author, said that the research team was motivated to think about how they “could reduce the negative environmental impact of practicing dermatology” after they read a paper about the environmental impact of endoscopy, written by a gastroenterologist.

In the study, no pregnancies occurred and monthly tests were performed, but “formal assessment of pregnancy risk with virtual isotretinoin management would be warranted,” Dr. Lee and coauthors wrote, noting too that, while no differences were seen with respect to isotretinoin side effects, these were not formally analyzed.

Dr. Zinn said that he and colleagues at WVUH are currently conducting clinical trials to assess the quality and efficacy of virtual care for patients with acne, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis. Delivering care virtually “will be easier to do if there are data supporting [its] quality and efficacy,” he said. Rosacea is another condition that may be amendable to virtual care, he noted.

Meanwhile, he said, isotretinoin management is “well suited” for virtual visits. When initiating isotretinoin treatment, Dr. Zinn now “proactively inquires” if patients would like to pursue their follow-up visits virtually. “I’ll note that it will save the time and decrease the burden of travel, including the financial cost as well as the environmental cost of travel,” he said, estimating that about half of their management visits are currently virtual.

Asked about the study, Misha Rosenbach, MD, associate professor of dermatology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, said the reduced carbon footprint calculated by the researchers and its downstream health benefits “should be taken into consideration by [dermatology] departments, insurers and policymakers” when making decisions about teledermatology.

While environmental impact is “not something I think most institutions are considering for virtual versus in-person care, they should be. And some are,” said Dr. Rosenbach, a founder and cochair of the American Academy of Dermatology Expert Resource Group for Climate Change and Environmental Issues.

Limitations of the study include the generalizability of the results. The impact of virtual isotretinoin management “may be less in predominantly urban areas” than it is in predominately rural West Virginia, the study authors note. And in the case of West Virginia, travel to a local laboratory and pharmacy offsets some of the environmental benefits for the virtual care, they noted. Such travel wasn’t accounted for in the study, but it was found to be a fraction of travel to the WVU hospital clinic. (Patients traveled a median of 5.8 miles to a lab 2.4 times from March 25 to Dec. 1, 2020.)

Dr. Lee will start his dermatology residency at WVU next year. The study was funded by a grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation. The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest, according to Dr. Lee.

The environmental impact of virtual isotretinoin management at West Virginia University Hospital (WVUH) in 2020 has been estimated in a new study: A reduction of 5,137 kg of greenhouse gas emissions in carbon dioxide equivalents.

In what they say is “one of the first studies to evaluate the environmental impact of any aspect of dermatology,” the authors of the retrospective cross-sectional study identified patients who had virtual visits for isotretinoin management between March 25 and May 29, 2020, – the period during which all such visits were conducted virtually in keeping with hospital recommendations to minimize the spread of COVID-19.

The investigators, from the department of dermatology and the department of civil and environmental engineering at West Virginia University, Morgantown, then counted the number of virtual visits that occurred during this period and through Dec. 1, 2020, (175 virtual visits), calculated the distance patients would have traveled round-trip had these visits been in-person, and converted miles saved into the environmental impact using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Federal Highway Administration data and relevant EPA standards.

Most patients had elected to continue virtual visits after May 29, the point at which patients were given the option to return to the WVUH clinic. (Patients who initiated treatment during the 2-month identification period were not included.)

The investigators determined that virtual management of isotretinoin saved a median of 37.8 miles per visit during the study period of March 25 to Dec. 1, and estimated that the virtual visits reduced total travel by 14,450 miles. For the analysis, patients were assumed to use light-duty vehicles.

In addition to calculating the reduction in emissions during the study period (5,137 kg of CO₂equivalents) they used patient census data from 2019 to 2020 and data from the study period to project the mileage – and the associated emissions – that would be saved annually if all in-person visits for isotretinoin management occurred virtually.

Their calculation for a projected emissions reduction with 1 year of all-virtual isotretinoin management was 49,400 kg of greenhouse gas emissions in CO₂equivalents. This is the emission load released when 24,690 kg of coal are burned or 6.3 million smartphones are charged, the researchers wrote.

“Considering that more than 1,000,000 prescriptions of isotretinoin are authorized annually in the United States, the environmental impact could be magnified if virtual delivery of isotretinoin care is adopted on a national scale,” they commented.“Given the serious consequences of global climate change, analysis of the environmental impact of all fields of medicine, including dermatology, is warranted,” they added.

The reduced greenhouse gas emissions are “definitely [being taken] into consideration for future decisions about virtual visits” in the department of dermatology, said Zachary Zinn, MD, residency director and associate professor in the department of dermatology at West Virginia University, Morgantown, who is the senior author of the study. “The main benefit of virtual care in my opinion,” he said in an interview, “is the potential to reduce our carbon footprint.”

Justin Lee, MD, an intern at WVU and the study’s first author, said that the research team was motivated to think about how they “could reduce the negative environmental impact of practicing dermatology” after they read a paper about the environmental impact of endoscopy, written by a gastroenterologist.

In the study, no pregnancies occurred and monthly tests were performed, but “formal assessment of pregnancy risk with virtual isotretinoin management would be warranted,” Dr. Lee and coauthors wrote, noting too that, while no differences were seen with respect to isotretinoin side effects, these were not formally analyzed.

Dr. Zinn said that he and colleagues at WVUH are currently conducting clinical trials to assess the quality and efficacy of virtual care for patients with acne, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis. Delivering care virtually “will be easier to do if there are data supporting [its] quality and efficacy,” he said. Rosacea is another condition that may be amendable to virtual care, he noted.

Meanwhile, he said, isotretinoin management is “well suited” for virtual visits. When initiating isotretinoin treatment, Dr. Zinn now “proactively inquires” if patients would like to pursue their follow-up visits virtually. “I’ll note that it will save the time and decrease the burden of travel, including the financial cost as well as the environmental cost of travel,” he said, estimating that about half of their management visits are currently virtual.

Asked about the study, Misha Rosenbach, MD, associate professor of dermatology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, said the reduced carbon footprint calculated by the researchers and its downstream health benefits “should be taken into consideration by [dermatology] departments, insurers and policymakers” when making decisions about teledermatology.

While environmental impact is “not something I think most institutions are considering for virtual versus in-person care, they should be. And some are,” said Dr. Rosenbach, a founder and cochair of the American Academy of Dermatology Expert Resource Group for Climate Change and Environmental Issues.

Limitations of the study include the generalizability of the results. The impact of virtual isotretinoin management “may be less in predominantly urban areas” than it is in predominately rural West Virginia, the study authors note. And in the case of West Virginia, travel to a local laboratory and pharmacy offsets some of the environmental benefits for the virtual care, they noted. Such travel wasn’t accounted for in the study, but it was found to be a fraction of travel to the WVU hospital clinic. (Patients traveled a median of 5.8 miles to a lab 2.4 times from March 25 to Dec. 1, 2020.)

Dr. Lee will start his dermatology residency at WVU next year. The study was funded by a grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation. The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest, according to Dr. Lee.