Antithrombotic agents linked to hematuria-related complications

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Antithrombotic agents linked to hematuria-related complications

Photo courtesy of CDC
Doctor and hospitalized patient

New research suggests antithrombotic agents increase the risk of hematuria-related complications in older adults.

The study included more than 2.5 million Canadians over the age of 65.

The subjects had an increased risk of emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and urologic procedures to manage visible hematuria if they had received anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet agents.

Robert K. Nam, MD, of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and his colleagues reported these findings in JAMA.

The researchers examined rates of hematuria-related complications in 2,518,064 citizens of Ontario who were 66 and older between 2002 and 2014.

In all, 808,897 patients received at least 1 prescription for an antithrombotic agent over the study period. This included apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, warfarin, aspirin, and “other” antiplatelet agents.

At a median follow-up of 7.3 years, the incidence density rates (per 1000 person-years) of hematuria-related complications were 123.95 events among patients who were exposed to antithrombotic agents and 80.17 events among patients who were not (difference=43.8; 95% CI, 43.0-44.6; P<0.001; incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.44; 95% CI, 1.42-1.46).

The incidence density rates of emergency department visits were 7.05 and 2.51, respectively (difference=4.5; 95% CI, 4.3-4.7; P<0.001; IRR=2.80; 95% CI, 2.74-2.86).

The incidence density rates of hospitalizations were 11.12 and 5.42, respectively (difference=5.7; 95% CI, 5.5-5.9; P<0.001; IRR=2.03; 95% CI, 2.00-2.06).

And the incidence density rates of urologic procedures were 105.78 and 72.24, respectively (difference=33.5; 95% CI, 32.8-34.3; P<0.001; IRR=1.37; 95% CI, 1.36-1.39).

The association between antithrombotic agents and hematuria-related complications was present for all the antithrombotic agents examined.

The researchers noted that this study had limitations. In particular, the cohort was restricted to patients age 66 and older because of funding eligibility for prescription medications in Ontario. Given the interaction between age and the association of antithrombotic therapies with hematuria-related complications, these results are not directly applicable to younger patients.

Publications
Topics

Photo courtesy of CDC
Doctor and hospitalized patient

New research suggests antithrombotic agents increase the risk of hematuria-related complications in older adults.

The study included more than 2.5 million Canadians over the age of 65.

The subjects had an increased risk of emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and urologic procedures to manage visible hematuria if they had received anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet agents.

Robert K. Nam, MD, of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and his colleagues reported these findings in JAMA.

The researchers examined rates of hematuria-related complications in 2,518,064 citizens of Ontario who were 66 and older between 2002 and 2014.

In all, 808,897 patients received at least 1 prescription for an antithrombotic agent over the study period. This included apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, warfarin, aspirin, and “other” antiplatelet agents.

At a median follow-up of 7.3 years, the incidence density rates (per 1000 person-years) of hematuria-related complications were 123.95 events among patients who were exposed to antithrombotic agents and 80.17 events among patients who were not (difference=43.8; 95% CI, 43.0-44.6; P<0.001; incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.44; 95% CI, 1.42-1.46).

The incidence density rates of emergency department visits were 7.05 and 2.51, respectively (difference=4.5; 95% CI, 4.3-4.7; P<0.001; IRR=2.80; 95% CI, 2.74-2.86).

The incidence density rates of hospitalizations were 11.12 and 5.42, respectively (difference=5.7; 95% CI, 5.5-5.9; P<0.001; IRR=2.03; 95% CI, 2.00-2.06).

And the incidence density rates of urologic procedures were 105.78 and 72.24, respectively (difference=33.5; 95% CI, 32.8-34.3; P<0.001; IRR=1.37; 95% CI, 1.36-1.39).

The association between antithrombotic agents and hematuria-related complications was present for all the antithrombotic agents examined.

The researchers noted that this study had limitations. In particular, the cohort was restricted to patients age 66 and older because of funding eligibility for prescription medications in Ontario. Given the interaction between age and the association of antithrombotic therapies with hematuria-related complications, these results are not directly applicable to younger patients.

Photo courtesy of CDC
Doctor and hospitalized patient

New research suggests antithrombotic agents increase the risk of hematuria-related complications in older adults.

The study included more than 2.5 million Canadians over the age of 65.

The subjects had an increased risk of emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and urologic procedures to manage visible hematuria if they had received anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet agents.

Robert K. Nam, MD, of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and his colleagues reported these findings in JAMA.

The researchers examined rates of hematuria-related complications in 2,518,064 citizens of Ontario who were 66 and older between 2002 and 2014.

In all, 808,897 patients received at least 1 prescription for an antithrombotic agent over the study period. This included apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, warfarin, aspirin, and “other” antiplatelet agents.

At a median follow-up of 7.3 years, the incidence density rates (per 1000 person-years) of hematuria-related complications were 123.95 events among patients who were exposed to antithrombotic agents and 80.17 events among patients who were not (difference=43.8; 95% CI, 43.0-44.6; P<0.001; incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.44; 95% CI, 1.42-1.46).

The incidence density rates of emergency department visits were 7.05 and 2.51, respectively (difference=4.5; 95% CI, 4.3-4.7; P<0.001; IRR=2.80; 95% CI, 2.74-2.86).

The incidence density rates of hospitalizations were 11.12 and 5.42, respectively (difference=5.7; 95% CI, 5.5-5.9; P<0.001; IRR=2.03; 95% CI, 2.00-2.06).

And the incidence density rates of urologic procedures were 105.78 and 72.24, respectively (difference=33.5; 95% CI, 32.8-34.3; P<0.001; IRR=1.37; 95% CI, 1.36-1.39).

The association between antithrombotic agents and hematuria-related complications was present for all the antithrombotic agents examined.

The researchers noted that this study had limitations. In particular, the cohort was restricted to patients age 66 and older because of funding eligibility for prescription medications in Ontario. Given the interaction between age and the association of antithrombotic therapies with hematuria-related complications, these results are not directly applicable to younger patients.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Antithrombotic agents linked to hematuria-related complications
Display Headline
Antithrombotic agents linked to hematuria-related complications
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Clinical trials summary: AGILE

Article Type
Changed

 

Study of AG-120 (Ivosidenib) vs. Placebo in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia With an IDH1 Mutation (AGILE)

AG120-C-009 (NCT03173248) will evaluate the efficacy and safety of AG-120 (ivosidenib) plus azacitidine vs. placebo plus azacitidine in adult subjects with previously untreated IDH1m AML who are considered appropriate candidates for non-intensive therapy.

 

The primary endpoint of this global, phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial is overall survival. Key secondary efficacy endpoints are event-free survival, rate of complete remission, rate of complete remission with partial hematologic recovery, and overall response rate. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive either oral AG-120 or matched placebo, both administered in combination with subcutaneous or intravenous azacitidine. An estimated 392 subjects will participate in the study, which is sponsored by Agios Pharmaceuticals. Estimated completion date is June 2022.

Locations: UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles; Illinois Cancer Specialists, Niles, Illinois; Indiana Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Indianapolis; Norton Cancer Institute, Louisville, Kentucky; Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Gabrail Cancer Center, Canton, Ohio; Oncology Hematology Care, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio; Greenville Health System Cancer Institute, Greenville, South Carolina; Baylor Research Institute, Dallas.

Contact: Medical Affairs Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; (844) 633-2332, e-mail: [email protected]

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Study of AG-120 (Ivosidenib) vs. Placebo in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia With an IDH1 Mutation (AGILE)

AG120-C-009 (NCT03173248) will evaluate the efficacy and safety of AG-120 (ivosidenib) plus azacitidine vs. placebo plus azacitidine in adult subjects with previously untreated IDH1m AML who are considered appropriate candidates for non-intensive therapy.

 

The primary endpoint of this global, phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial is overall survival. Key secondary efficacy endpoints are event-free survival, rate of complete remission, rate of complete remission with partial hematologic recovery, and overall response rate. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive either oral AG-120 or matched placebo, both administered in combination with subcutaneous or intravenous azacitidine. An estimated 392 subjects will participate in the study, which is sponsored by Agios Pharmaceuticals. Estimated completion date is June 2022.

Locations: UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles; Illinois Cancer Specialists, Niles, Illinois; Indiana Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Indianapolis; Norton Cancer Institute, Louisville, Kentucky; Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Gabrail Cancer Center, Canton, Ohio; Oncology Hematology Care, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio; Greenville Health System Cancer Institute, Greenville, South Carolina; Baylor Research Institute, Dallas.

Contact: Medical Affairs Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; (844) 633-2332, e-mail: [email protected]

 

Study of AG-120 (Ivosidenib) vs. Placebo in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia With an IDH1 Mutation (AGILE)

AG120-C-009 (NCT03173248) will evaluate the efficacy and safety of AG-120 (ivosidenib) plus azacitidine vs. placebo plus azacitidine in adult subjects with previously untreated IDH1m AML who are considered appropriate candidates for non-intensive therapy.

 

The primary endpoint of this global, phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial is overall survival. Key secondary efficacy endpoints are event-free survival, rate of complete remission, rate of complete remission with partial hematologic recovery, and overall response rate. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive either oral AG-120 or matched placebo, both administered in combination with subcutaneous or intravenous azacitidine. An estimated 392 subjects will participate in the study, which is sponsored by Agios Pharmaceuticals. Estimated completion date is June 2022.

Locations: UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles; Illinois Cancer Specialists, Niles, Illinois; Indiana Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Indianapolis; Norton Cancer Institute, Louisville, Kentucky; Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Gabrail Cancer Center, Canton, Ohio; Oncology Hematology Care, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio; Greenville Health System Cancer Institute, Greenville, South Carolina; Baylor Research Institute, Dallas.

Contact: Medical Affairs Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; (844) 633-2332, e-mail: [email protected]

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Nearly 80% of health care personnel stepped up for flu shots

Article Type
Changed

 

Nearly four out of five health care personnel in the United States received a flu vaccination during the 2016-2017 flu season, but a majority of those working in long-term care settings were not vaccinated, based on data from an Internet survey of more than 2,000 individuals that was conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

A total of 78.6% of the survey’s respondents said they’d been vaccinated during the 2016-2017 season. Vaccination coverage for health care personnel overall has remained in the 77%-79% range in recent years, but that represents an increase from 64% in 2010-2011.

“As in previous seasons, the highest coverage was among HCP whose workplace had vaccination requirements,” noted Carla L. Black, PhD, of the CDC, and colleagues (MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Sep 29;66[38]:1009-15). The researchers reviewed data collected from an Internet panel survey of 2,438 health care personnel between March 28, 2017, and April 19, 2017.

Physicians boasted the highest vaccination coverage in 2016-2017 (96%), followed by pharmacists (94%), nurses (93%), nurse practitioners and physician assistants (92%), other clinical providers (80%), nonclinical health care providers (74%), and aides and assistants (69%).

Flu vaccination rates were highest among HCPs working in a hospital setting (92%); 94% of survey respondents in hospitals reported either having a vaccination requirement at work or being provided at least 1 day of on-site vaccination.

Vaccination rates were lowest among health care personnel in long-term care settings (68%), where only 26% reported a workplace vaccination requirement. However, vaccination rates in long-term care rose to 90% when employers required vaccination.

The report’s findings were limited by several factors, including the use of a volunteer sample, the reliance on self-reports, and the potential differences between Internet survey results and population-based estimates of flu vaccination.

However, “in the absence of vaccination requirements, the findings in this study support the recommendations found in the Guide to Community Preventive Services, which include active promotion of on-site vaccination at no cost or low cost to increase influenza vaccination coverage among HCPs,” the researchers said.

The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Nearly four out of five health care personnel in the United States received a flu vaccination during the 2016-2017 flu season, but a majority of those working in long-term care settings were not vaccinated, based on data from an Internet survey of more than 2,000 individuals that was conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

A total of 78.6% of the survey’s respondents said they’d been vaccinated during the 2016-2017 season. Vaccination coverage for health care personnel overall has remained in the 77%-79% range in recent years, but that represents an increase from 64% in 2010-2011.

“As in previous seasons, the highest coverage was among HCP whose workplace had vaccination requirements,” noted Carla L. Black, PhD, of the CDC, and colleagues (MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Sep 29;66[38]:1009-15). The researchers reviewed data collected from an Internet panel survey of 2,438 health care personnel between March 28, 2017, and April 19, 2017.

Physicians boasted the highest vaccination coverage in 2016-2017 (96%), followed by pharmacists (94%), nurses (93%), nurse practitioners and physician assistants (92%), other clinical providers (80%), nonclinical health care providers (74%), and aides and assistants (69%).

Flu vaccination rates were highest among HCPs working in a hospital setting (92%); 94% of survey respondents in hospitals reported either having a vaccination requirement at work or being provided at least 1 day of on-site vaccination.

Vaccination rates were lowest among health care personnel in long-term care settings (68%), where only 26% reported a workplace vaccination requirement. However, vaccination rates in long-term care rose to 90% when employers required vaccination.

The report’s findings were limited by several factors, including the use of a volunteer sample, the reliance on self-reports, and the potential differences between Internet survey results and population-based estimates of flu vaccination.

However, “in the absence of vaccination requirements, the findings in this study support the recommendations found in the Guide to Community Preventive Services, which include active promotion of on-site vaccination at no cost or low cost to increase influenza vaccination coverage among HCPs,” the researchers said.

The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

 

Nearly four out of five health care personnel in the United States received a flu vaccination during the 2016-2017 flu season, but a majority of those working in long-term care settings were not vaccinated, based on data from an Internet survey of more than 2,000 individuals that was conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

A total of 78.6% of the survey’s respondents said they’d been vaccinated during the 2016-2017 season. Vaccination coverage for health care personnel overall has remained in the 77%-79% range in recent years, but that represents an increase from 64% in 2010-2011.

“As in previous seasons, the highest coverage was among HCP whose workplace had vaccination requirements,” noted Carla L. Black, PhD, of the CDC, and colleagues (MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Sep 29;66[38]:1009-15). The researchers reviewed data collected from an Internet panel survey of 2,438 health care personnel between March 28, 2017, and April 19, 2017.

Physicians boasted the highest vaccination coverage in 2016-2017 (96%), followed by pharmacists (94%), nurses (93%), nurse practitioners and physician assistants (92%), other clinical providers (80%), nonclinical health care providers (74%), and aides and assistants (69%).

Flu vaccination rates were highest among HCPs working in a hospital setting (92%); 94% of survey respondents in hospitals reported either having a vaccination requirement at work or being provided at least 1 day of on-site vaccination.

Vaccination rates were lowest among health care personnel in long-term care settings (68%), where only 26% reported a workplace vaccination requirement. However, vaccination rates in long-term care rose to 90% when employers required vaccination.

The report’s findings were limited by several factors, including the use of a volunteer sample, the reliance on self-reports, and the potential differences between Internet survey results and population-based estimates of flu vaccination.

However, “in the absence of vaccination requirements, the findings in this study support the recommendations found in the Guide to Community Preventive Services, which include active promotion of on-site vaccination at no cost or low cost to increase influenza vaccination coverage among HCPs,” the researchers said.

The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM MMWR

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Employer mandates and convenient workplace opportunities increased flu vaccination among health care personnel.

Major finding: Overall flu vaccination coverage among U.S. health care personnel was 78.6% in the 2016-2017 season

Data source: The data come from an Internet survey of 2,438 health care personnel.

Disclosures: The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Disqus Comments
Default

Hyperlipidemia diagnosis protects against breast cancer

Article Type
Changed

 

– Women diagnosed with hyperlipidemia had a strikingly reduced risk of subsequently developing breast cancer in a big-data, case-control study, Paul R. Carter, MD, reported at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.

Moreover, those baseline hyperlipidemic women who later got breast cancer had a 40% lower risk of all-cause mortality than did matched nonhyperlipidemic controls diagnosed with the malignancy during follow-up, according to Dr. Carter, a cardiology fellow at Cambridge (England) University.

The inference isn’t that hyperlipidemia somehow protects against the most common type of cancer in women. Indeed, preclinical evidence indicates high cholesterol drives several key steps in carcinogenesis. Rather, the strong implication is that the explanation for the observed preventive effect lies in the pleotropic effects of the statin therapy routinely prescribed in accordance with guidelines once women received the diagnosis of hyperlipidemia, he continued.

“The results of this study provide the strongest justification to date for a clinical trial evaluating the protective effect of statins in patients with breast cancer, and this is what we intend to do,” according to Dr. Carter.

He presented a retrospective longitudinal study of the Algorithm for Comorbidities, Associations, Length of Stay and Mortality database, comprising more than 1.2 million patients admitted for various reasons to selected hospitals in northern England during 2000-2014. This big-data study entailed recruitment of 16,043 women aged 40 years and older who were diagnosed with hyperlipidemia during their hospital stay along with an equal number of age-matched women with normal lipid levels. None of the participants had a breast cancer diagnosis at baseline.

Dr. Paul R. Carter
During follow-up, 0.5% of the baseline hyperlipidemic women were diagnosed with breast cancer, as were 0.8% of controls. Because of the large patient numbers involved, this difference was statistically significant, with the baseline hyperlipidemic women showing a 33% reduction in the risk of breast cancer, compared with controls in a multivariate regression analysis adjusted for age, ethnicity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obesity, MI, and heart failure.

The all-cause mortality rate in baseline hyperlipidemic women who later developed breast cancer was 27.4%, significantly lower than the 37.4% rate in normolipidemic women with breast cancer. This translated into an adjusted 40% relative risk reduction.

All-cause mortality occurred during follow-up in 13.7% of breast cancer–free women with baseline hyperlipidemia, compared with 23.6% of nonhyperlipidemic controls without breast cancer.

In an analysis adjusted for age, ethnicity, and the top-10 causes of death in the U.K., women with baseline hyperlipidemia were 40% less likely to die during follow-up than were women without high cholesterol.

Dr. Carter reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding his study, which was conducted free of commercial support.
Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Women diagnosed with hyperlipidemia had a strikingly reduced risk of subsequently developing breast cancer in a big-data, case-control study, Paul R. Carter, MD, reported at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.

Moreover, those baseline hyperlipidemic women who later got breast cancer had a 40% lower risk of all-cause mortality than did matched nonhyperlipidemic controls diagnosed with the malignancy during follow-up, according to Dr. Carter, a cardiology fellow at Cambridge (England) University.

The inference isn’t that hyperlipidemia somehow protects against the most common type of cancer in women. Indeed, preclinical evidence indicates high cholesterol drives several key steps in carcinogenesis. Rather, the strong implication is that the explanation for the observed preventive effect lies in the pleotropic effects of the statin therapy routinely prescribed in accordance with guidelines once women received the diagnosis of hyperlipidemia, he continued.

“The results of this study provide the strongest justification to date for a clinical trial evaluating the protective effect of statins in patients with breast cancer, and this is what we intend to do,” according to Dr. Carter.

He presented a retrospective longitudinal study of the Algorithm for Comorbidities, Associations, Length of Stay and Mortality database, comprising more than 1.2 million patients admitted for various reasons to selected hospitals in northern England during 2000-2014. This big-data study entailed recruitment of 16,043 women aged 40 years and older who were diagnosed with hyperlipidemia during their hospital stay along with an equal number of age-matched women with normal lipid levels. None of the participants had a breast cancer diagnosis at baseline.

Dr. Paul R. Carter
During follow-up, 0.5% of the baseline hyperlipidemic women were diagnosed with breast cancer, as were 0.8% of controls. Because of the large patient numbers involved, this difference was statistically significant, with the baseline hyperlipidemic women showing a 33% reduction in the risk of breast cancer, compared with controls in a multivariate regression analysis adjusted for age, ethnicity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obesity, MI, and heart failure.

The all-cause mortality rate in baseline hyperlipidemic women who later developed breast cancer was 27.4%, significantly lower than the 37.4% rate in normolipidemic women with breast cancer. This translated into an adjusted 40% relative risk reduction.

All-cause mortality occurred during follow-up in 13.7% of breast cancer–free women with baseline hyperlipidemia, compared with 23.6% of nonhyperlipidemic controls without breast cancer.

In an analysis adjusted for age, ethnicity, and the top-10 causes of death in the U.K., women with baseline hyperlipidemia were 40% less likely to die during follow-up than were women without high cholesterol.

Dr. Carter reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding his study, which was conducted free of commercial support.

 

– Women diagnosed with hyperlipidemia had a strikingly reduced risk of subsequently developing breast cancer in a big-data, case-control study, Paul R. Carter, MD, reported at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.

Moreover, those baseline hyperlipidemic women who later got breast cancer had a 40% lower risk of all-cause mortality than did matched nonhyperlipidemic controls diagnosed with the malignancy during follow-up, according to Dr. Carter, a cardiology fellow at Cambridge (England) University.

The inference isn’t that hyperlipidemia somehow protects against the most common type of cancer in women. Indeed, preclinical evidence indicates high cholesterol drives several key steps in carcinogenesis. Rather, the strong implication is that the explanation for the observed preventive effect lies in the pleotropic effects of the statin therapy routinely prescribed in accordance with guidelines once women received the diagnosis of hyperlipidemia, he continued.

“The results of this study provide the strongest justification to date for a clinical trial evaluating the protective effect of statins in patients with breast cancer, and this is what we intend to do,” according to Dr. Carter.

He presented a retrospective longitudinal study of the Algorithm for Comorbidities, Associations, Length of Stay and Mortality database, comprising more than 1.2 million patients admitted for various reasons to selected hospitals in northern England during 2000-2014. This big-data study entailed recruitment of 16,043 women aged 40 years and older who were diagnosed with hyperlipidemia during their hospital stay along with an equal number of age-matched women with normal lipid levels. None of the participants had a breast cancer diagnosis at baseline.

Dr. Paul R. Carter
During follow-up, 0.5% of the baseline hyperlipidemic women were diagnosed with breast cancer, as were 0.8% of controls. Because of the large patient numbers involved, this difference was statistically significant, with the baseline hyperlipidemic women showing a 33% reduction in the risk of breast cancer, compared with controls in a multivariate regression analysis adjusted for age, ethnicity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obesity, MI, and heart failure.

The all-cause mortality rate in baseline hyperlipidemic women who later developed breast cancer was 27.4%, significantly lower than the 37.4% rate in normolipidemic women with breast cancer. This translated into an adjusted 40% relative risk reduction.

All-cause mortality occurred during follow-up in 13.7% of breast cancer–free women with baseline hyperlipidemia, compared with 23.6% of nonhyperlipidemic controls without breast cancer.

In an analysis adjusted for age, ethnicity, and the top-10 causes of death in the U.K., women with baseline hyperlipidemia were 40% less likely to die during follow-up than were women without high cholesterol.

Dr. Carter reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding his study, which was conducted free of commercial support.
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT THE ESC CONGRESS 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Statins may prevent or reduce mortality from breast cancer.

Major finding: The risk of subsequent development of breast cancer was one-third lower in women diagnosed with hyperlipidemia than in controls with normal lipid levels.

Data source: A retrospective longitudinal case-control study of 16,043 U.K. women aged 40 years or older when diagnosed with hyperlipidemia and an equal number of age-matched women with normal lipids.

Disclosures: The presenter reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding his study, which was conducted free of commercial support.

Disqus Comments
Default

Insulin pumps associated with lower risk of ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycemia in kids

Article Type
Changed

 

Children with type 1 diabetes mellitus who use insulin pumps are at a lower risk for ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycemia, compared with those receiving insulin by injection, according to a population-based cohort study from the University of Ulm, Germany.

The study participants were all younger than 20 years of age and were divided into the following groups for data analysis: 1.5-5 years; 6-10 years; 11-15 years; or 16-19 years. The study evaluated both primary and secondary outcomes to analyze the effectiveness of insulin pumps vs. traditional insulin injections. The primary outcomes were the rates of ketoacidosis and hypoglycemia severe enough to require assistance from another person to administer intravenous carbohydrates or induce hypoglycemic coma. The secondary outcomes were serum levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), daily insulin dose, prandial to total insulin ratio, frequency of self-monitoring blood glucose level, and body mass index, according to Beate Karges, MD, of the University of Aachen (Germany), Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, and her colleagues.

After applying selection criteria, 30,579 patients treated for type 1 diabetes were selected for analysis. Of the 30,579, a 1 to 1 matched cohort of 19,628 patients, split into equal sized groups, was created for propensity score analysis to compare the effect of treatment between insulin pumps and injects. The matched cohort was also included in the entire cohort for another propensity score analysis. Of the entire 30,579 patients, 14,119 used pump therapy and 16,460 used traditional daily insulin injections.

In the matched cohort, event rates for both severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemic coma were much lower with insulin pumps than with traditional insulin injections (9.55 vs. 13.97 per 100 patient-years and 2.30 vs. 2.96 per 100 patient-years, respectively). The pattern of pump therapy lowering rates of severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemic coma was observed in entire cohort as well, according to the investigators (JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318[14]:1358-66).

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Mbbradford/CC-by-3.0
Insulin pump with infusion set
Similar results were observed in the matched cohort for ketoacidosis rates. Patients using insulin pump therapy exhibited much lower rates of ketoacidosis (2.29 vs 2.80 per 100 patient-years). The pattern of pump therapy lowering rates of severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemic coma was observed in the entire cohort as well.

The secondary outcomes of the matched cohort did not share as consistent a pattern as the primary outcomes. HbA1c levels were lower in pump users (8.04% vs. 8.22%). Total daily insulin doses were lower in pump users, but the prandial to total insulin ratio was higher. Daily frequency of self-monitoring blood glucose level was also elevated in pump users.

“These findings provide evidence for improved clinical outcomes associated with insulin pump therapy, compared with injection therapy, in children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes,” Dr. Karges and her colleagues wrote.

The study was funded by both the Competence Network Diabetes Mellitus and the German Center for Diabetes Research. Thomas Kapellen, MD, had received funding from the European Commission concerning closed-loop systems as well as speaking fees for pharmaceuticals companies including Abbott, Medtronic, and Novo Nordisk. No other authors reported financial conflicts.
Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Children with type 1 diabetes mellitus who use insulin pumps are at a lower risk for ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycemia, compared with those receiving insulin by injection, according to a population-based cohort study from the University of Ulm, Germany.

The study participants were all younger than 20 years of age and were divided into the following groups for data analysis: 1.5-5 years; 6-10 years; 11-15 years; or 16-19 years. The study evaluated both primary and secondary outcomes to analyze the effectiveness of insulin pumps vs. traditional insulin injections. The primary outcomes were the rates of ketoacidosis and hypoglycemia severe enough to require assistance from another person to administer intravenous carbohydrates or induce hypoglycemic coma. The secondary outcomes were serum levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), daily insulin dose, prandial to total insulin ratio, frequency of self-monitoring blood glucose level, and body mass index, according to Beate Karges, MD, of the University of Aachen (Germany), Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, and her colleagues.

After applying selection criteria, 30,579 patients treated for type 1 diabetes were selected for analysis. Of the 30,579, a 1 to 1 matched cohort of 19,628 patients, split into equal sized groups, was created for propensity score analysis to compare the effect of treatment between insulin pumps and injects. The matched cohort was also included in the entire cohort for another propensity score analysis. Of the entire 30,579 patients, 14,119 used pump therapy and 16,460 used traditional daily insulin injections.

In the matched cohort, event rates for both severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemic coma were much lower with insulin pumps than with traditional insulin injections (9.55 vs. 13.97 per 100 patient-years and 2.30 vs. 2.96 per 100 patient-years, respectively). The pattern of pump therapy lowering rates of severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemic coma was observed in entire cohort as well, according to the investigators (JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318[14]:1358-66).

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Mbbradford/CC-by-3.0
Insulin pump with infusion set
Similar results were observed in the matched cohort for ketoacidosis rates. Patients using insulin pump therapy exhibited much lower rates of ketoacidosis (2.29 vs 2.80 per 100 patient-years). The pattern of pump therapy lowering rates of severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemic coma was observed in the entire cohort as well.

The secondary outcomes of the matched cohort did not share as consistent a pattern as the primary outcomes. HbA1c levels were lower in pump users (8.04% vs. 8.22%). Total daily insulin doses were lower in pump users, but the prandial to total insulin ratio was higher. Daily frequency of self-monitoring blood glucose level was also elevated in pump users.

“These findings provide evidence for improved clinical outcomes associated with insulin pump therapy, compared with injection therapy, in children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes,” Dr. Karges and her colleagues wrote.

The study was funded by both the Competence Network Diabetes Mellitus and the German Center for Diabetes Research. Thomas Kapellen, MD, had received funding from the European Commission concerning closed-loop systems as well as speaking fees for pharmaceuticals companies including Abbott, Medtronic, and Novo Nordisk. No other authors reported financial conflicts.

 

Children with type 1 diabetes mellitus who use insulin pumps are at a lower risk for ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycemia, compared with those receiving insulin by injection, according to a population-based cohort study from the University of Ulm, Germany.

The study participants were all younger than 20 years of age and were divided into the following groups for data analysis: 1.5-5 years; 6-10 years; 11-15 years; or 16-19 years. The study evaluated both primary and secondary outcomes to analyze the effectiveness of insulin pumps vs. traditional insulin injections. The primary outcomes were the rates of ketoacidosis and hypoglycemia severe enough to require assistance from another person to administer intravenous carbohydrates or induce hypoglycemic coma. The secondary outcomes were serum levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), daily insulin dose, prandial to total insulin ratio, frequency of self-monitoring blood glucose level, and body mass index, according to Beate Karges, MD, of the University of Aachen (Germany), Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, and her colleagues.

After applying selection criteria, 30,579 patients treated for type 1 diabetes were selected for analysis. Of the 30,579, a 1 to 1 matched cohort of 19,628 patients, split into equal sized groups, was created for propensity score analysis to compare the effect of treatment between insulin pumps and injects. The matched cohort was also included in the entire cohort for another propensity score analysis. Of the entire 30,579 patients, 14,119 used pump therapy and 16,460 used traditional daily insulin injections.

In the matched cohort, event rates for both severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemic coma were much lower with insulin pumps than with traditional insulin injections (9.55 vs. 13.97 per 100 patient-years and 2.30 vs. 2.96 per 100 patient-years, respectively). The pattern of pump therapy lowering rates of severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemic coma was observed in entire cohort as well, according to the investigators (JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318[14]:1358-66).

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Mbbradford/CC-by-3.0
Insulin pump with infusion set
Similar results were observed in the matched cohort for ketoacidosis rates. Patients using insulin pump therapy exhibited much lower rates of ketoacidosis (2.29 vs 2.80 per 100 patient-years). The pattern of pump therapy lowering rates of severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemic coma was observed in the entire cohort as well.

The secondary outcomes of the matched cohort did not share as consistent a pattern as the primary outcomes. HbA1c levels were lower in pump users (8.04% vs. 8.22%). Total daily insulin doses were lower in pump users, but the prandial to total insulin ratio was higher. Daily frequency of self-monitoring blood glucose level was also elevated in pump users.

“These findings provide evidence for improved clinical outcomes associated with insulin pump therapy, compared with injection therapy, in children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes,” Dr. Karges and her colleagues wrote.

The study was funded by both the Competence Network Diabetes Mellitus and the German Center for Diabetes Research. Thomas Kapellen, MD, had received funding from the European Commission concerning closed-loop systems as well as speaking fees for pharmaceuticals companies including Abbott, Medtronic, and Novo Nordisk. No other authors reported financial conflicts.
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM JAMA

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Insulin pumps are associated with lower risks of ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycemia in young patients.

Major finding: Patients using insulin pumps had lower rates of hypoglycemia (9.55 per 100 patient-years) and severe ketoacidosis (3.64 per 100 patient-years).

Data source: Population cohort study of 30,579 patients from the Diabetes Prospective Follow-up Initiative Database.

Disclosures: The study was funded by both the Competence Network Diabetes Mellitus and the German Center for Diabetes Research. Thomas Kapellen, MD, had received funding from the European Commission concerning closed-loop systems as well as speaking fees for pharmaceutical companies including Abbott, Medtronic, and Novo Nordisk. No other authors reported financial conflicts.

Disqus Comments
Default

Revisions proposed for sexual behaviors in ICD-11

Article Type
Changed

 

– A move to depathologize paraphilias that do not adversely affect self or others is at the heart of changes suggested for the eleventh revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems.

The upcoming version of the World Health Organization document, slated for release in 2018, would reduce the number of named F65 classifications from nine to five, Richard B. Krueger, MD, said at the meeting of the World Psychiatric Association.

Three behaviors now included – fetishism, fetishistic transvestitism, and sadomasochism – would be dropped altogether, said Dr. Krueger of Columbia University, New York. Others would be streamlined into four more general diagnostic groupings (exhibitionism, voyeurism, pedophilia, and coercive sexual sadism disorderA fifth diagnosis, frotteuristic disorder, would be added in light of its fairly common presentation in clinical practice. Two new general categories would address unspecified behaviors that potentially are criminal, or which cause distress or danger to the individual who performs them, Dr. Krueger said.

The proposed changes would bring the document more in line with the DSM-5, said Dr. Krueger, who also leads the Working Group on the Classification of Sexual Disorders and Sexual Health. WHO charged the committee with reviewing the evidence and making recommendations for categories related to sexuality that are contained in the chapter of Mental and Behavioral Disorders in ICD-10.

Dr. Richard Krueger
“The proposed guidelines for paraphilic disorders are now conceptually closer to DSM-5 in that they require a sustained, focused, and intense pattern of sexual arousal as manifested by persistent sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviors,” he said. “Also, the individual must have acted on these thoughts, fantasies, or urges, or be markedly distressed by them.”

This definition parallels the A criterion in the paraphilic definitions in the DSM-5, which identifies a pattern of “recurrent and intense sexual arousal” as well as the B criterion, which specifies that the person “has acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.”

The proposed revisions reflect a growing acceptance of the immense variation in human sexual behavior, and the depathologization of some of them, as long as they do not affect public health, said Dr. Krueger, a psychiatrist with expertise in forensic and sexual psychiatry.

“In a general sense, this is analogous to the situation that we faced with alcohol and drug users in the early 20th century, when the main treatment was incarceration. In the 1940s and 50s, if you admitted an alcoholic to the hospital for delirium tremens, you could risk losing your admitting privileges. This is similar to where we are now with the paraphilic disorders,” he said, with most of them still considered potentially criminal.

That paraphilic disorders will remain at all in ICD-11 is something of a compromise.

“At first, we considered outright deletion of this section. Many psychiatrists have suggested we have no business with these disorders, since paraphilias are largely dealt with in the legal system. Some feel that psychiatrists should not be involved with them at all. But there has been a lot of discussion about the public health impact of these behaviors. For example, about 50% of men incarcerated for crimes against children meet the diagnostic criteria for pedophilia, and about 10% of crimes that result in incarceration in the U.S. are sexual crimes. There is also forensic usage of these diagnoses in many countries in Europe, and in Great Britain, the U.S., and Canada, so we felt that it’s important to maintain them” as diagnosable disorders. Keeping official diagnostic codes alive also helps encourage research into epidemiology and potential treatments, he added.

The committee’s first recommendation is to change the name of the chapter from “Disorders of Sexual Preference” to “Paraphilic Disorders.”

“This better represents the content of the section, which involves atypical sexual interests,” Dr. Krueger said. “The word ‘disorders’ was added to clarify that these atypical interests have to be pathological. That is, they must result in action against a nonconsenting individual, or cause severe distress or significant risk of injury or death to the patient.”

This emphasis on a pathological aspect to the diagnoses leads directly to the elimination of the fetishism, transvestitism, and sadomasochism categories, which are considered largely benign. “These have no public health importance, generally no association with distress or functional impairment, and including them can result in stigmatization with no discernible health benefit,” Dr. Krueger said. “If you’re a sadomasochist and not bothered by it, and engage alone or with a consenting person, it’s not a problem. Why should these categories be retained if they are not associated with distress or dysfunction? If they are not, then clearly they are not disorders.”

The remaining diagnoses were not as cut-and-dried, he said. Voyeurism, exhibitionism, pedophilia, and frotteurism clearly can affect others who are either unwilling or unable to consent because of age or other circumstances – for example, children, unaware targets, and animals. These behaviors also present with different intensities, from solitary imaginings to well planned and executed acts.

Sadomasochism did retain an altered diagnostic code as a new entity: coercive sexual sadism disorder. While many practice sadomasochism with a willing partner and are not disturbed by it, the committee acknowledged that crimes of sexual sadism are a serious threat to public health and should be recognized as such.

The committee also added two general categories to cover unnamed paraphilias, of which there are many.

“Other paraphilic disorder involving nonconsenting individuals” may be used for a behavior in which the focus of arousal is unwilling or unable to consent, but not specified. Zoophilia would fall into this category, as would other potentially criminal acts. “We can capture a huge variety of paraphilic behaviors under this rubric,” Dr. Krueger said.

During discussion, some clinicians expressed concern that, in its effort to depathologize solitary behavior, the proposal shortchanges patients who suffer deeply from their sexual behaviors. An example, one British psychiatrist said, is the person who is distressed because he can’t experience sexual enjoyment without a particular object or behavior. The final diagnostic category, “Other paraphilic disorder involving solitary behavior or consenting individuals,” will serve that person’s needs, Dr. Krueger said.

“This is an attempt to address the concern if a behavior markedly distresses a person, outside of the rather normal fear of social rejection, or if the behavior poses a serious risk, such as asphyxiophilia.”

The draft proposal was published earlier this year in Archives of Sexual Behavior (2017 Jul;46[5]:1529-45).

Dr. Krueger had no financial disclosures.

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– A move to depathologize paraphilias that do not adversely affect self or others is at the heart of changes suggested for the eleventh revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems.

The upcoming version of the World Health Organization document, slated for release in 2018, would reduce the number of named F65 classifications from nine to five, Richard B. Krueger, MD, said at the meeting of the World Psychiatric Association.

Three behaviors now included – fetishism, fetishistic transvestitism, and sadomasochism – would be dropped altogether, said Dr. Krueger of Columbia University, New York. Others would be streamlined into four more general diagnostic groupings (exhibitionism, voyeurism, pedophilia, and coercive sexual sadism disorderA fifth diagnosis, frotteuristic disorder, would be added in light of its fairly common presentation in clinical practice. Two new general categories would address unspecified behaviors that potentially are criminal, or which cause distress or danger to the individual who performs them, Dr. Krueger said.

The proposed changes would bring the document more in line with the DSM-5, said Dr. Krueger, who also leads the Working Group on the Classification of Sexual Disorders and Sexual Health. WHO charged the committee with reviewing the evidence and making recommendations for categories related to sexuality that are contained in the chapter of Mental and Behavioral Disorders in ICD-10.

Dr. Richard Krueger
“The proposed guidelines for paraphilic disorders are now conceptually closer to DSM-5 in that they require a sustained, focused, and intense pattern of sexual arousal as manifested by persistent sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviors,” he said. “Also, the individual must have acted on these thoughts, fantasies, or urges, or be markedly distressed by them.”

This definition parallels the A criterion in the paraphilic definitions in the DSM-5, which identifies a pattern of “recurrent and intense sexual arousal” as well as the B criterion, which specifies that the person “has acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.”

The proposed revisions reflect a growing acceptance of the immense variation in human sexual behavior, and the depathologization of some of them, as long as they do not affect public health, said Dr. Krueger, a psychiatrist with expertise in forensic and sexual psychiatry.

“In a general sense, this is analogous to the situation that we faced with alcohol and drug users in the early 20th century, when the main treatment was incarceration. In the 1940s and 50s, if you admitted an alcoholic to the hospital for delirium tremens, you could risk losing your admitting privileges. This is similar to where we are now with the paraphilic disorders,” he said, with most of them still considered potentially criminal.

That paraphilic disorders will remain at all in ICD-11 is something of a compromise.

“At first, we considered outright deletion of this section. Many psychiatrists have suggested we have no business with these disorders, since paraphilias are largely dealt with in the legal system. Some feel that psychiatrists should not be involved with them at all. But there has been a lot of discussion about the public health impact of these behaviors. For example, about 50% of men incarcerated for crimes against children meet the diagnostic criteria for pedophilia, and about 10% of crimes that result in incarceration in the U.S. are sexual crimes. There is also forensic usage of these diagnoses in many countries in Europe, and in Great Britain, the U.S., and Canada, so we felt that it’s important to maintain them” as diagnosable disorders. Keeping official diagnostic codes alive also helps encourage research into epidemiology and potential treatments, he added.

The committee’s first recommendation is to change the name of the chapter from “Disorders of Sexual Preference” to “Paraphilic Disorders.”

“This better represents the content of the section, which involves atypical sexual interests,” Dr. Krueger said. “The word ‘disorders’ was added to clarify that these atypical interests have to be pathological. That is, they must result in action against a nonconsenting individual, or cause severe distress or significant risk of injury or death to the patient.”

This emphasis on a pathological aspect to the diagnoses leads directly to the elimination of the fetishism, transvestitism, and sadomasochism categories, which are considered largely benign. “These have no public health importance, generally no association with distress or functional impairment, and including them can result in stigmatization with no discernible health benefit,” Dr. Krueger said. “If you’re a sadomasochist and not bothered by it, and engage alone or with a consenting person, it’s not a problem. Why should these categories be retained if they are not associated with distress or dysfunction? If they are not, then clearly they are not disorders.”

The remaining diagnoses were not as cut-and-dried, he said. Voyeurism, exhibitionism, pedophilia, and frotteurism clearly can affect others who are either unwilling or unable to consent because of age or other circumstances – for example, children, unaware targets, and animals. These behaviors also present with different intensities, from solitary imaginings to well planned and executed acts.

Sadomasochism did retain an altered diagnostic code as a new entity: coercive sexual sadism disorder. While many practice sadomasochism with a willing partner and are not disturbed by it, the committee acknowledged that crimes of sexual sadism are a serious threat to public health and should be recognized as such.

The committee also added two general categories to cover unnamed paraphilias, of which there are many.

“Other paraphilic disorder involving nonconsenting individuals” may be used for a behavior in which the focus of arousal is unwilling or unable to consent, but not specified. Zoophilia would fall into this category, as would other potentially criminal acts. “We can capture a huge variety of paraphilic behaviors under this rubric,” Dr. Krueger said.

During discussion, some clinicians expressed concern that, in its effort to depathologize solitary behavior, the proposal shortchanges patients who suffer deeply from their sexual behaviors. An example, one British psychiatrist said, is the person who is distressed because he can’t experience sexual enjoyment without a particular object or behavior. The final diagnostic category, “Other paraphilic disorder involving solitary behavior or consenting individuals,” will serve that person’s needs, Dr. Krueger said.

“This is an attempt to address the concern if a behavior markedly distresses a person, outside of the rather normal fear of social rejection, or if the behavior poses a serious risk, such as asphyxiophilia.”

The draft proposal was published earlier this year in Archives of Sexual Behavior (2017 Jul;46[5]:1529-45).

Dr. Krueger had no financial disclosures.

 

 

– A move to depathologize paraphilias that do not adversely affect self or others is at the heart of changes suggested for the eleventh revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems.

The upcoming version of the World Health Organization document, slated for release in 2018, would reduce the number of named F65 classifications from nine to five, Richard B. Krueger, MD, said at the meeting of the World Psychiatric Association.

Three behaviors now included – fetishism, fetishistic transvestitism, and sadomasochism – would be dropped altogether, said Dr. Krueger of Columbia University, New York. Others would be streamlined into four more general diagnostic groupings (exhibitionism, voyeurism, pedophilia, and coercive sexual sadism disorderA fifth diagnosis, frotteuristic disorder, would be added in light of its fairly common presentation in clinical practice. Two new general categories would address unspecified behaviors that potentially are criminal, or which cause distress or danger to the individual who performs them, Dr. Krueger said.

The proposed changes would bring the document more in line with the DSM-5, said Dr. Krueger, who also leads the Working Group on the Classification of Sexual Disorders and Sexual Health. WHO charged the committee with reviewing the evidence and making recommendations for categories related to sexuality that are contained in the chapter of Mental and Behavioral Disorders in ICD-10.

Dr. Richard Krueger
“The proposed guidelines for paraphilic disorders are now conceptually closer to DSM-5 in that they require a sustained, focused, and intense pattern of sexual arousal as manifested by persistent sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviors,” he said. “Also, the individual must have acted on these thoughts, fantasies, or urges, or be markedly distressed by them.”

This definition parallels the A criterion in the paraphilic definitions in the DSM-5, which identifies a pattern of “recurrent and intense sexual arousal” as well as the B criterion, which specifies that the person “has acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.”

The proposed revisions reflect a growing acceptance of the immense variation in human sexual behavior, and the depathologization of some of them, as long as they do not affect public health, said Dr. Krueger, a psychiatrist with expertise in forensic and sexual psychiatry.

“In a general sense, this is analogous to the situation that we faced with alcohol and drug users in the early 20th century, when the main treatment was incarceration. In the 1940s and 50s, if you admitted an alcoholic to the hospital for delirium tremens, you could risk losing your admitting privileges. This is similar to where we are now with the paraphilic disorders,” he said, with most of them still considered potentially criminal.

That paraphilic disorders will remain at all in ICD-11 is something of a compromise.

“At first, we considered outright deletion of this section. Many psychiatrists have suggested we have no business with these disorders, since paraphilias are largely dealt with in the legal system. Some feel that psychiatrists should not be involved with them at all. But there has been a lot of discussion about the public health impact of these behaviors. For example, about 50% of men incarcerated for crimes against children meet the diagnostic criteria for pedophilia, and about 10% of crimes that result in incarceration in the U.S. are sexual crimes. There is also forensic usage of these diagnoses in many countries in Europe, and in Great Britain, the U.S., and Canada, so we felt that it’s important to maintain them” as diagnosable disorders. Keeping official diagnostic codes alive also helps encourage research into epidemiology and potential treatments, he added.

The committee’s first recommendation is to change the name of the chapter from “Disorders of Sexual Preference” to “Paraphilic Disorders.”

“This better represents the content of the section, which involves atypical sexual interests,” Dr. Krueger said. “The word ‘disorders’ was added to clarify that these atypical interests have to be pathological. That is, they must result in action against a nonconsenting individual, or cause severe distress or significant risk of injury or death to the patient.”

This emphasis on a pathological aspect to the diagnoses leads directly to the elimination of the fetishism, transvestitism, and sadomasochism categories, which are considered largely benign. “These have no public health importance, generally no association with distress or functional impairment, and including them can result in stigmatization with no discernible health benefit,” Dr. Krueger said. “If you’re a sadomasochist and not bothered by it, and engage alone or with a consenting person, it’s not a problem. Why should these categories be retained if they are not associated with distress or dysfunction? If they are not, then clearly they are not disorders.”

The remaining diagnoses were not as cut-and-dried, he said. Voyeurism, exhibitionism, pedophilia, and frotteurism clearly can affect others who are either unwilling or unable to consent because of age or other circumstances – for example, children, unaware targets, and animals. These behaviors also present with different intensities, from solitary imaginings to well planned and executed acts.

Sadomasochism did retain an altered diagnostic code as a new entity: coercive sexual sadism disorder. While many practice sadomasochism with a willing partner and are not disturbed by it, the committee acknowledged that crimes of sexual sadism are a serious threat to public health and should be recognized as such.

The committee also added two general categories to cover unnamed paraphilias, of which there are many.

“Other paraphilic disorder involving nonconsenting individuals” may be used for a behavior in which the focus of arousal is unwilling or unable to consent, but not specified. Zoophilia would fall into this category, as would other potentially criminal acts. “We can capture a huge variety of paraphilic behaviors under this rubric,” Dr. Krueger said.

During discussion, some clinicians expressed concern that, in its effort to depathologize solitary behavior, the proposal shortchanges patients who suffer deeply from their sexual behaviors. An example, one British psychiatrist said, is the person who is distressed because he can’t experience sexual enjoyment without a particular object or behavior. The final diagnostic category, “Other paraphilic disorder involving solitary behavior or consenting individuals,” will serve that person’s needs, Dr. Krueger said.

“This is an attempt to address the concern if a behavior markedly distresses a person, outside of the rather normal fear of social rejection, or if the behavior poses a serious risk, such as asphyxiophilia.”

The draft proposal was published earlier this year in Archives of Sexual Behavior (2017 Jul;46[5]:1529-45).

Dr. Krueger had no financial disclosures.

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

AT WPA 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

HIV Testing Low Among Transgender Adults

Article Type
Changed
CDC researchers found that the trend of HIV testing is lower in some groups, based on gender and cultural identity.

Transgender men and women are at high risk for HIV infection. In a recent analysis of more than 9 million CDC-funded HIV test results, transgender women had the highest percentage of confirmed positive results (2.7%) of any gender category. But this group also tends to have too-low testing numbers. In a CDC study, only 36% of transgender women and 32% of transgender men reported being tested; only 10% of both groups had been tested in the past year. By comparison, gay and bisexual men reported getting tested at roughly twice the rates (61.8% ever and 21.6% past year).

Black transgender women and men had twice the prevalence of ever testing compared with their white counterparts (63%-67% vs 31%-33%). Transgender women who had been diagnosed with a depressive disorder had the highest prevalence of getting tested for HIV (69%).

Transgender persons face “unique barriers to testing,” the CDC researchers say, such as the HIV stigma within the transgender community, gender identity stigma in health care settings, and socioeconomic marginalization. The CDC is working on “innovative approaches” to delivering HIV testing and other prevention and support services to transgender persons who are at risk for or have newly diagnosed HIV.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Related Articles
CDC researchers found that the trend of HIV testing is lower in some groups, based on gender and cultural identity.
CDC researchers found that the trend of HIV testing is lower in some groups, based on gender and cultural identity.

Transgender men and women are at high risk for HIV infection. In a recent analysis of more than 9 million CDC-funded HIV test results, transgender women had the highest percentage of confirmed positive results (2.7%) of any gender category. But this group also tends to have too-low testing numbers. In a CDC study, only 36% of transgender women and 32% of transgender men reported being tested; only 10% of both groups had been tested in the past year. By comparison, gay and bisexual men reported getting tested at roughly twice the rates (61.8% ever and 21.6% past year).

Black transgender women and men had twice the prevalence of ever testing compared with their white counterparts (63%-67% vs 31%-33%). Transgender women who had been diagnosed with a depressive disorder had the highest prevalence of getting tested for HIV (69%).

Transgender persons face “unique barriers to testing,” the CDC researchers say, such as the HIV stigma within the transgender community, gender identity stigma in health care settings, and socioeconomic marginalization. The CDC is working on “innovative approaches” to delivering HIV testing and other prevention and support services to transgender persons who are at risk for or have newly diagnosed HIV.

Transgender men and women are at high risk for HIV infection. In a recent analysis of more than 9 million CDC-funded HIV test results, transgender women had the highest percentage of confirmed positive results (2.7%) of any gender category. But this group also tends to have too-low testing numbers. In a CDC study, only 36% of transgender women and 32% of transgender men reported being tested; only 10% of both groups had been tested in the past year. By comparison, gay and bisexual men reported getting tested at roughly twice the rates (61.8% ever and 21.6% past year).

Black transgender women and men had twice the prevalence of ever testing compared with their white counterparts (63%-67% vs 31%-33%). Transgender women who had been diagnosed with a depressive disorder had the highest prevalence of getting tested for HIV (69%).

Transgender persons face “unique barriers to testing,” the CDC researchers say, such as the HIV stigma within the transgender community, gender identity stigma in health care settings, and socioeconomic marginalization. The CDC is working on “innovative approaches” to delivering HIV testing and other prevention and support services to transgender persons who are at risk for or have newly diagnosed HIV.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Immunotherapy demonstrates potential for T-cell lymphoma

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Immunotherapy demonstrates potential for T-cell lymphoma

Image by Joshua Stokes
Natural killer cell destroying a cancer cell

Researchers have reported successful inhibition of the phosphatase SHIP1, which may be an effective approach for treating T-cell lymphoma.

The team found that intermittent treatment with a SHIP1 inhibitor prevented the immune exhaustion observed with SHIP1 deletion.

Intermittent SHIP1 inhibition enhanced the antitumor activity of natural killer (NK) cells and T cells in a mouse model of T-cell lymphoma.

The treatment also appeared to have a direct chemotherapeutic effect and induced immunological memory against lymphoma cells.

Matthew Gumbleton, MD, of SUNY Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, New York, and his colleagues reported these results in Science Signaling.

The researchers noted that previous efforts to inhibit SHIP1 have yielded disappointing results. Mice engineered to lack the SHIP1 gene had poorly responsive immune systems, potentially because overactivated cells became exhausted.

Dr Gumbleton and his colleagues found they could overcome this problem by administering a SHIP1 inhibitor—3-a-aminocholestane (3AC)—in a pulsed regimen of 2 consecutive treatment days per week.

The team tested this regimen in mouse models of colorectal cancer and T-cell lymphoma (RMA-Rae1).

In the lymphoma model, intermittent 3AC treatment increased the responsiveness of T cells and NK cells.

The treatment significantly increased the number of NK cells at the tumor site and the terminal maturation of the peripheral NK-cell compartment.

3AC also enhanced FasL-Fas–mediated killing of lymphoma cells. (NK cells induce apoptosis of target cells via Fas-FasL signaling.)

However, 3AC treatment reduced lymphoma burden in NK-cell-deficient mice as well. Therefore, the researchers believe 3AC may have a direct chemotherapeutic effect.

The team also found that intermittent 3AC treatment increased survival in lymphoma-bearing mice.

Treated mice had significantly longer survival than control mice. And some of the treated mice had long-term survival with no evidence of tumor burden, which suggests the treatment could be curative.

Additional experiments revealed that both NK cells and T cells were required to induce long-term survival in the lymphoma-bearing mice.

Finally, the researchers found evidence to suggest that 3AC treatment triggered “immunological memory capable of sustained and protective antitumor response that prevents relapse.”

The team infused hematolymphoid cells from either a naïve donor mouse or a lymphoma-challenged, 3AC-treated, long-term-surviving donor mouse into naïve host mice. The host mice were then challenged with RMA-Rae1 cells but didn’t receive 3AC.

Mice that received cells from the 3AC-treated donors had significantly better survival than mice that received cells from naive donors.

Based on these results, the researchers concluded that intermittent SHIP1 inhibition may be effective for treating and preventing relapse of T-cell lymphoma and other cancers.

Publications
Topics

Image by Joshua Stokes
Natural killer cell destroying a cancer cell

Researchers have reported successful inhibition of the phosphatase SHIP1, which may be an effective approach for treating T-cell lymphoma.

The team found that intermittent treatment with a SHIP1 inhibitor prevented the immune exhaustion observed with SHIP1 deletion.

Intermittent SHIP1 inhibition enhanced the antitumor activity of natural killer (NK) cells and T cells in a mouse model of T-cell lymphoma.

The treatment also appeared to have a direct chemotherapeutic effect and induced immunological memory against lymphoma cells.

Matthew Gumbleton, MD, of SUNY Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, New York, and his colleagues reported these results in Science Signaling.

The researchers noted that previous efforts to inhibit SHIP1 have yielded disappointing results. Mice engineered to lack the SHIP1 gene had poorly responsive immune systems, potentially because overactivated cells became exhausted.

Dr Gumbleton and his colleagues found they could overcome this problem by administering a SHIP1 inhibitor—3-a-aminocholestane (3AC)—in a pulsed regimen of 2 consecutive treatment days per week.

The team tested this regimen in mouse models of colorectal cancer and T-cell lymphoma (RMA-Rae1).

In the lymphoma model, intermittent 3AC treatment increased the responsiveness of T cells and NK cells.

The treatment significantly increased the number of NK cells at the tumor site and the terminal maturation of the peripheral NK-cell compartment.

3AC also enhanced FasL-Fas–mediated killing of lymphoma cells. (NK cells induce apoptosis of target cells via Fas-FasL signaling.)

However, 3AC treatment reduced lymphoma burden in NK-cell-deficient mice as well. Therefore, the researchers believe 3AC may have a direct chemotherapeutic effect.

The team also found that intermittent 3AC treatment increased survival in lymphoma-bearing mice.

Treated mice had significantly longer survival than control mice. And some of the treated mice had long-term survival with no evidence of tumor burden, which suggests the treatment could be curative.

Additional experiments revealed that both NK cells and T cells were required to induce long-term survival in the lymphoma-bearing mice.

Finally, the researchers found evidence to suggest that 3AC treatment triggered “immunological memory capable of sustained and protective antitumor response that prevents relapse.”

The team infused hematolymphoid cells from either a naïve donor mouse or a lymphoma-challenged, 3AC-treated, long-term-surviving donor mouse into naïve host mice. The host mice were then challenged with RMA-Rae1 cells but didn’t receive 3AC.

Mice that received cells from the 3AC-treated donors had significantly better survival than mice that received cells from naive donors.

Based on these results, the researchers concluded that intermittent SHIP1 inhibition may be effective for treating and preventing relapse of T-cell lymphoma and other cancers.

Image by Joshua Stokes
Natural killer cell destroying a cancer cell

Researchers have reported successful inhibition of the phosphatase SHIP1, which may be an effective approach for treating T-cell lymphoma.

The team found that intermittent treatment with a SHIP1 inhibitor prevented the immune exhaustion observed with SHIP1 deletion.

Intermittent SHIP1 inhibition enhanced the antitumor activity of natural killer (NK) cells and T cells in a mouse model of T-cell lymphoma.

The treatment also appeared to have a direct chemotherapeutic effect and induced immunological memory against lymphoma cells.

Matthew Gumbleton, MD, of SUNY Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, New York, and his colleagues reported these results in Science Signaling.

The researchers noted that previous efforts to inhibit SHIP1 have yielded disappointing results. Mice engineered to lack the SHIP1 gene had poorly responsive immune systems, potentially because overactivated cells became exhausted.

Dr Gumbleton and his colleagues found they could overcome this problem by administering a SHIP1 inhibitor—3-a-aminocholestane (3AC)—in a pulsed regimen of 2 consecutive treatment days per week.

The team tested this regimen in mouse models of colorectal cancer and T-cell lymphoma (RMA-Rae1).

In the lymphoma model, intermittent 3AC treatment increased the responsiveness of T cells and NK cells.

The treatment significantly increased the number of NK cells at the tumor site and the terminal maturation of the peripheral NK-cell compartment.

3AC also enhanced FasL-Fas–mediated killing of lymphoma cells. (NK cells induce apoptosis of target cells via Fas-FasL signaling.)

However, 3AC treatment reduced lymphoma burden in NK-cell-deficient mice as well. Therefore, the researchers believe 3AC may have a direct chemotherapeutic effect.

The team also found that intermittent 3AC treatment increased survival in lymphoma-bearing mice.

Treated mice had significantly longer survival than control mice. And some of the treated mice had long-term survival with no evidence of tumor burden, which suggests the treatment could be curative.

Additional experiments revealed that both NK cells and T cells were required to induce long-term survival in the lymphoma-bearing mice.

Finally, the researchers found evidence to suggest that 3AC treatment triggered “immunological memory capable of sustained and protective antitumor response that prevents relapse.”

The team infused hematolymphoid cells from either a naïve donor mouse or a lymphoma-challenged, 3AC-treated, long-term-surviving donor mouse into naïve host mice. The host mice were then challenged with RMA-Rae1 cells but didn’t receive 3AC.

Mice that received cells from the 3AC-treated donors had significantly better survival than mice that received cells from naive donors.

Based on these results, the researchers concluded that intermittent SHIP1 inhibition may be effective for treating and preventing relapse of T-cell lymphoma and other cancers.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Immunotherapy demonstrates potential for T-cell lymphoma
Display Headline
Immunotherapy demonstrates potential for T-cell lymphoma
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

AML trial placed on full clinical hold

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
AML trial placed on full clinical hold

Photo by Esther Dyson
Preparing drug for a trial

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed a full clinical hold on a phase 1/2 trial of SEL24, a dual PIM/FLT3 kinase inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The hold is due to a fatal cerebral adverse event that is considered possibly related to SEL24.

The clinical hold means no new patients will be enrolled in the trial and enrolled patients will not receive SEL24 until the hold is lifted.

Selvita S.A., the company developing SEL24, received a clinical hold letter from the FDA on October 6 and said it plans to work with the agency to have the hold lifted.

As part of this process, Selvita will provide the FDA with additional data and analysis on patients treated with SEL24 as well as a proposed protocol amendment.

The trial began in the first quarter of 2017. The study is designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose of SEL24 in patients with relapsed and refractory AML. The study began with a 25 mg daily dose, which was then escalated following cohort reviews.

One AML patient started treatment with a 150 mg dose of SEL24 as the third patient in this dose cohort and received 4 doses of the drug. This patient developed a life-threatening, grade 4 venous thrombus in the brain with subsequent intracerebral hemorrhage, which required hospitalization.

The patient died in hospice 4 days later due to the cerebral event. The patient’s death was subsequently evaluated as possibly related to SEL24.

A safety report and a review of data by the trial’s data monitoring committee were submitted to the FDA. The agency then placed a clinical hold on the trial and requested more safety data on patients who have received SEL24, as well as specific protocol changes and additional guidance to the study staff.

Selvita said it plans to comply with the requests and provide additional information to the agency and clinical trial centers, in collaboration with the Menarini Group, its global development partner for SEL24.

The FDA has 30 days from the receipt of Selvita’s response to let the company know whether the clinical hold is lifted.

Publications
Topics

Photo by Esther Dyson
Preparing drug for a trial

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed a full clinical hold on a phase 1/2 trial of SEL24, a dual PIM/FLT3 kinase inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The hold is due to a fatal cerebral adverse event that is considered possibly related to SEL24.

The clinical hold means no new patients will be enrolled in the trial and enrolled patients will not receive SEL24 until the hold is lifted.

Selvita S.A., the company developing SEL24, received a clinical hold letter from the FDA on October 6 and said it plans to work with the agency to have the hold lifted.

As part of this process, Selvita will provide the FDA with additional data and analysis on patients treated with SEL24 as well as a proposed protocol amendment.

The trial began in the first quarter of 2017. The study is designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose of SEL24 in patients with relapsed and refractory AML. The study began with a 25 mg daily dose, which was then escalated following cohort reviews.

One AML patient started treatment with a 150 mg dose of SEL24 as the third patient in this dose cohort and received 4 doses of the drug. This patient developed a life-threatening, grade 4 venous thrombus in the brain with subsequent intracerebral hemorrhage, which required hospitalization.

The patient died in hospice 4 days later due to the cerebral event. The patient’s death was subsequently evaluated as possibly related to SEL24.

A safety report and a review of data by the trial’s data monitoring committee were submitted to the FDA. The agency then placed a clinical hold on the trial and requested more safety data on patients who have received SEL24, as well as specific protocol changes and additional guidance to the study staff.

Selvita said it plans to comply with the requests and provide additional information to the agency and clinical trial centers, in collaboration with the Menarini Group, its global development partner for SEL24.

The FDA has 30 days from the receipt of Selvita’s response to let the company know whether the clinical hold is lifted.

Photo by Esther Dyson
Preparing drug for a trial

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed a full clinical hold on a phase 1/2 trial of SEL24, a dual PIM/FLT3 kinase inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The hold is due to a fatal cerebral adverse event that is considered possibly related to SEL24.

The clinical hold means no new patients will be enrolled in the trial and enrolled patients will not receive SEL24 until the hold is lifted.

Selvita S.A., the company developing SEL24, received a clinical hold letter from the FDA on October 6 and said it plans to work with the agency to have the hold lifted.

As part of this process, Selvita will provide the FDA with additional data and analysis on patients treated with SEL24 as well as a proposed protocol amendment.

The trial began in the first quarter of 2017. The study is designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose of SEL24 in patients with relapsed and refractory AML. The study began with a 25 mg daily dose, which was then escalated following cohort reviews.

One AML patient started treatment with a 150 mg dose of SEL24 as the third patient in this dose cohort and received 4 doses of the drug. This patient developed a life-threatening, grade 4 venous thrombus in the brain with subsequent intracerebral hemorrhage, which required hospitalization.

The patient died in hospice 4 days later due to the cerebral event. The patient’s death was subsequently evaluated as possibly related to SEL24.

A safety report and a review of data by the trial’s data monitoring committee were submitted to the FDA. The agency then placed a clinical hold on the trial and requested more safety data on patients who have received SEL24, as well as specific protocol changes and additional guidance to the study staff.

Selvita said it plans to comply with the requests and provide additional information to the agency and clinical trial centers, in collaboration with the Menarini Group, its global development partner for SEL24.

The FDA has 30 days from the receipt of Selvita’s response to let the company know whether the clinical hold is lifted.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
AML trial placed on full clinical hold
Display Headline
AML trial placed on full clinical hold
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

FDA rejects pegfilgrastim biosimilar

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
FDA rejects pegfilgrastim biosimilar

Photo by Rhoda Baer
Cancer patient receiving chemotherapy

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a complete response letter saying the agency cannot approve MYL-1401H, a proposed biosimilar of pegfilgrastim (Neulasta).

Biocon and Mylan are seeking approval of MYL-1401H to reduce the duration of neutropenia and the incidence of febrile neutropenia in adults receiving chemotherapy to treat non-myeloid malignancies.

Biocon and Mylan filed the biologics license application for MYL-1401H in February.

The FDA had planned to issue a decision on the application by October 9.

Biocon and Mylan said the FDA’s complete response letter relates to a pending update to the application. The update involves chemistry manufacturing and control data from facility requalification activities after recent plant modifications.

The complete response letter did not raise any questions on the biosimilarity of MYL-1401H, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data, clinical data, or immunogenicity. (Results of a phase 3 study presented at ESMO 2016 Congress suggested MYL-1401H is equivalent to Neulasta.)

Biocon and Mylan said they do not expect the complete response letter for MYL-1401H to impact the commercial launch timing of the drug in the US. The companies said they are committed to working with the FDA to resolve the issues outlined in the letter.

Publications
Topics

Photo by Rhoda Baer
Cancer patient receiving chemotherapy

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a complete response letter saying the agency cannot approve MYL-1401H, a proposed biosimilar of pegfilgrastim (Neulasta).

Biocon and Mylan are seeking approval of MYL-1401H to reduce the duration of neutropenia and the incidence of febrile neutropenia in adults receiving chemotherapy to treat non-myeloid malignancies.

Biocon and Mylan filed the biologics license application for MYL-1401H in February.

The FDA had planned to issue a decision on the application by October 9.

Biocon and Mylan said the FDA’s complete response letter relates to a pending update to the application. The update involves chemistry manufacturing and control data from facility requalification activities after recent plant modifications.

The complete response letter did not raise any questions on the biosimilarity of MYL-1401H, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data, clinical data, or immunogenicity. (Results of a phase 3 study presented at ESMO 2016 Congress suggested MYL-1401H is equivalent to Neulasta.)

Biocon and Mylan said they do not expect the complete response letter for MYL-1401H to impact the commercial launch timing of the drug in the US. The companies said they are committed to working with the FDA to resolve the issues outlined in the letter.

Photo by Rhoda Baer
Cancer patient receiving chemotherapy

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a complete response letter saying the agency cannot approve MYL-1401H, a proposed biosimilar of pegfilgrastim (Neulasta).

Biocon and Mylan are seeking approval of MYL-1401H to reduce the duration of neutropenia and the incidence of febrile neutropenia in adults receiving chemotherapy to treat non-myeloid malignancies.

Biocon and Mylan filed the biologics license application for MYL-1401H in February.

The FDA had planned to issue a decision on the application by October 9.

Biocon and Mylan said the FDA’s complete response letter relates to a pending update to the application. The update involves chemistry manufacturing and control data from facility requalification activities after recent plant modifications.

The complete response letter did not raise any questions on the biosimilarity of MYL-1401H, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data, clinical data, or immunogenicity. (Results of a phase 3 study presented at ESMO 2016 Congress suggested MYL-1401H is equivalent to Neulasta.)

Biocon and Mylan said they do not expect the complete response letter for MYL-1401H to impact the commercial launch timing of the drug in the US. The companies said they are committed to working with the FDA to resolve the issues outlined in the letter.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
FDA rejects pegfilgrastim biosimilar
Display Headline
FDA rejects pegfilgrastim biosimilar
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica