Mydayis approved for teens, adults with ADHD

Article Type
Changed

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved a once-a-day treatment for patients aged 13 years and older with ADHD, Shire announced June 20 in a press release.

The approval of Mydayis was based on results from 16 clinical studies evaluating the medication in more than 1,600 adolescents (aged 13-17 years) and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In the placebo-controlled clinical studies, Mydayis significantly improved symptoms of ADHD, as measured by the ADHD-RS-IV and the Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP), in adults and adolescents. Improvement on the PERMP reached statistical significance beginning at 2 or 4 hours post dose and lasting up to 16 hours post dose.

In the phase III studies, a morning dose of Mydayis demonstrated superiority to placebo based on the change from baseline in the ADHD-RS-IV total score for adult and adolescent patients. The most common adverse reactions reported with Mydayis in adults were insomnia, decreased appetite, decreased weight, dry mouth, increased heart rate, and anxiety (incidence less than 5% and at a rate at least twice that of placebo). For pediatric patients, the most common adverse reactions were insomnia, decreased appetite, decreased weight, irritability, and nausea.

The medication, an amphetamine product, consists of three different types of drug-releasing beads.

“With this approval, we hope to help patients who need a once-daily treatment option,” Flemming Ornskov, MD, MPH, said in a press release. Dr. Ornskov is CEO of Shire.

It is estimated that 4.4% of adults have ADHD in the United States, and 50%-66% of children with ADHD may continue to have symptoms of the disorder as adults.

Mydayis will be commercially available in the United States in the third quarter of 2017.

Read the full press release here.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved a once-a-day treatment for patients aged 13 years and older with ADHD, Shire announced June 20 in a press release.

The approval of Mydayis was based on results from 16 clinical studies evaluating the medication in more than 1,600 adolescents (aged 13-17 years) and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In the placebo-controlled clinical studies, Mydayis significantly improved symptoms of ADHD, as measured by the ADHD-RS-IV and the Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP), in adults and adolescents. Improvement on the PERMP reached statistical significance beginning at 2 or 4 hours post dose and lasting up to 16 hours post dose.

In the phase III studies, a morning dose of Mydayis demonstrated superiority to placebo based on the change from baseline in the ADHD-RS-IV total score for adult and adolescent patients. The most common adverse reactions reported with Mydayis in adults were insomnia, decreased appetite, decreased weight, dry mouth, increased heart rate, and anxiety (incidence less than 5% and at a rate at least twice that of placebo). For pediatric patients, the most common adverse reactions were insomnia, decreased appetite, decreased weight, irritability, and nausea.

The medication, an amphetamine product, consists of three different types of drug-releasing beads.

“With this approval, we hope to help patients who need a once-daily treatment option,” Flemming Ornskov, MD, MPH, said in a press release. Dr. Ornskov is CEO of Shire.

It is estimated that 4.4% of adults have ADHD in the United States, and 50%-66% of children with ADHD may continue to have symptoms of the disorder as adults.

Mydayis will be commercially available in the United States in the third quarter of 2017.

Read the full press release here.

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved a once-a-day treatment for patients aged 13 years and older with ADHD, Shire announced June 20 in a press release.

The approval of Mydayis was based on results from 16 clinical studies evaluating the medication in more than 1,600 adolescents (aged 13-17 years) and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In the placebo-controlled clinical studies, Mydayis significantly improved symptoms of ADHD, as measured by the ADHD-RS-IV and the Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP), in adults and adolescents. Improvement on the PERMP reached statistical significance beginning at 2 or 4 hours post dose and lasting up to 16 hours post dose.

In the phase III studies, a morning dose of Mydayis demonstrated superiority to placebo based on the change from baseline in the ADHD-RS-IV total score for adult and adolescent patients. The most common adverse reactions reported with Mydayis in adults were insomnia, decreased appetite, decreased weight, dry mouth, increased heart rate, and anxiety (incidence less than 5% and at a rate at least twice that of placebo). For pediatric patients, the most common adverse reactions were insomnia, decreased appetite, decreased weight, irritability, and nausea.

The medication, an amphetamine product, consists of three different types of drug-releasing beads.

“With this approval, we hope to help patients who need a once-daily treatment option,” Flemming Ornskov, MD, MPH, said in a press release. Dr. Ornskov is CEO of Shire.

It is estimated that 4.4% of adults have ADHD in the United States, and 50%-66% of children with ADHD may continue to have symptoms of the disorder as adults.

Mydayis will be commercially available in the United States in the third quarter of 2017.

Read the full press release here.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

How to prevent secondary posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis

Article Type
Changed

 

– A variety of evidence-based strategies are available for preventing posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in patients who have already sustained an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. And they’re generally ignored, according to May Arna Risberg, PhD.

“We have a lot of knowledge. We can use secondary prevention strategies. And here I think we, as physical therapists, physicians, and orthopedic surgeons, are doing a lousy job because we are sending these ACL-injured patients back to sports before they have normalized knee function and quadriceps strength,” said Dr. Risberg, professor of sports medicine at the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences in Oslo.

With no proven disease-modifying therapy for KOA available to date, secondary prevention of posttraumatic KOA is worthy of high-priority status, she said at the World Congress on Osteoarthritis. An estimated 250,00 ACL injuries occur annually in the United States, and up to one-half of affected patients, most of whom are young, active people, will experience a second ACL rupture within the first few years after undergoing their initial reconstruction. This second ACL injury greatly increases their risk of developing posttraumatic KOA within 15-20 years, while they are still relatively young, she said.

Moreover, if the second ACL injury involves meniscus surgery, the 5-year risk of posttraumatic KOA roughly triples to up to 48%.

She highlighted a few effective strategies for preventing posttraumatic KOA in patients who already have an ACL injury.

Avoid reinjury

Dr. Risberg was senior author of a recent report from the prospective Delaware-Oslo Cohort Study involving 106 athletes who underwent ACL reconstruction following injury in what she termed level I sports. These are sports that entail lots of pivoting, jumping, and hard cutting, such as basketball, soccer, and handball.

In the first 2 years after ACL repair, 30% of patients who returned to participation in a level 1 sport experienced an ACL reinjury, compared with just 8% who opted for a lower-level sport. Athletes who returned to a level 1 sport had an adjusted 4.3 times greater ACL reinjury rate than those who didn’t, Dr. Risberg noted at the congress sponsored by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.

The good news is that this sharply increased reinjury risk was mitigated if return to a level 1 sport was delayed for at least 9 months post surgery and if the patient had regained quadriceps strength comparable to the uninjured side. For every month that return to sport was delayed out until 9 months post ACL reconstruction, the knee reinjury rate was reduced by 51% (Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:804-8).

In a meta-analysis by other investigators of 12 studies including 5,707 participants, weakness of the knee extensor muscles was independently associated with a 1.65 times increased risk of developing KOA (Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Feb;23[2]:171-7).

Attend to BMI

A discussion of the importance of maintaining a healthy body weight is an important aspect of patient education for athletes with knee injuries. In a cohort study of 988 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction, being overweight or obese was associated with a significantly increased risk of subsequent meniscal tears and chondral lesions (Am J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;43[12]:2966-73).

Also, it’s well established that obesity is a risk factor for knee OA, and Canadian investigators have shown that young athletes with a sports-related intra-articular knee injury were 3.75 times more likely to be overweight or obese 3-10 years post injury, compared with matched uninjured controls (Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Jul;23[7]:1122-9).

Consider prehabilitative exercise training

Dr. Risberg and coinvestigators have reported that preoperative quadriceps muscle strength deficits are predictive of impaired knee function, as measured by the Cincinnati Knee Score 2 years post surgery. She said she believes ACL reconstruction shouldn’t be done until quadriceps muscle strength is at least 80% of that in the uninjured limb (Br J Sports Med. 2009 May;43[5]:371-6). She and her coinvestigators have published the details of a 5-week progressive exercise therapy program in which they have shown results in significantly improved early postoperative knee function (J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Nov;40[11]:705-21). They now try to have patients complete the twice-weekly, 5-week program before final decisions are reached regarding whether to have ACL reconstruction.

Test all before okaying return to sport

It’s important to know if patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction have gotten full knee function back before determining if they’re ready for full-on sports participation. In the Delaware-Oslo Cohort Study, patients who delayed their return until at least 9 months after surgery and passed the return-to-sports test had a 5.6% reinjury rate within 2 years, while those who failed the return-to-sports criteria had a 38.2% ACL reinjury rate.

 

 

The return-to-sports testing utilized in this study entailed isokinetic quadriceps strength testing, the single hop leg test, the 14-item self-rated Knee Outcome Survey–Activities of Daily Living Scale, and a self-rated Global Rating Scale of perceived function on a 0-100 scale. To be cleared for return to sports, a patient had to demonstrate having regained at least 90% of quadriceps muscle strength and hop performance along with scoring in the normative range on both of the self-rating instruments.

Surgical vs. nonsurgical treatment of ACL rupture

The evidence on this score is conflicting, according to Dr. Risberg. While most physical therapists believe ACL reconstruction doesn’t protect against later development of KOA, as reflected in a meta-analysis of published studies (J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 19;96[4]:292-300), a more recent retrospective comparison of 964 patients with an isolated ACL tear and an equal number of matched controls concluded that patients treated nonoperatively were six times more likely to have been diagnosed with KOA and 16.7 times more likely to have undergone total knee replacement at a mean follow-up of 13.7 years than were those treated with ACL reconstruction (Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;44[7]:1699-707).

Dr. Risberg’s fellow panelist Jackie Whittaker, PhD, said that, as long as quadriceps muscle strengthening is a priority, it makes sense to strengthen the hamstring as well, particularly if the ACL reconstruction utilized the hamstring tendon.

“Also, I would add that it’s important to develop a relationship with these ACL-injured people, who are often very young. Preventing a disease that they’re going to get 20 years later isn’t a priority for them. You need to develop that relationship and build it up over time. Helping them set realistic expectations is very important. And we need to do what we can to help them find some sort of competitive outlet. A lot of these kids were very competitive, and now they’ve had an injury and can’t compete. They don’t want to go back to playing just any sport. They want to be able to be competitive, and if you don’t help them find another way to express that, they sort of give up on physical activity altogether,” according to Dr. Whittaker of the University of Alberta in Edmonton.

Dr. Risberg and Dr. Whittaker reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Related Articles

 

– A variety of evidence-based strategies are available for preventing posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in patients who have already sustained an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. And they’re generally ignored, according to May Arna Risberg, PhD.

“We have a lot of knowledge. We can use secondary prevention strategies. And here I think we, as physical therapists, physicians, and orthopedic surgeons, are doing a lousy job because we are sending these ACL-injured patients back to sports before they have normalized knee function and quadriceps strength,” said Dr. Risberg, professor of sports medicine at the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences in Oslo.

With no proven disease-modifying therapy for KOA available to date, secondary prevention of posttraumatic KOA is worthy of high-priority status, she said at the World Congress on Osteoarthritis. An estimated 250,00 ACL injuries occur annually in the United States, and up to one-half of affected patients, most of whom are young, active people, will experience a second ACL rupture within the first few years after undergoing their initial reconstruction. This second ACL injury greatly increases their risk of developing posttraumatic KOA within 15-20 years, while they are still relatively young, she said.

Moreover, if the second ACL injury involves meniscus surgery, the 5-year risk of posttraumatic KOA roughly triples to up to 48%.

She highlighted a few effective strategies for preventing posttraumatic KOA in patients who already have an ACL injury.

Avoid reinjury

Dr. Risberg was senior author of a recent report from the prospective Delaware-Oslo Cohort Study involving 106 athletes who underwent ACL reconstruction following injury in what she termed level I sports. These are sports that entail lots of pivoting, jumping, and hard cutting, such as basketball, soccer, and handball.

In the first 2 years after ACL repair, 30% of patients who returned to participation in a level 1 sport experienced an ACL reinjury, compared with just 8% who opted for a lower-level sport. Athletes who returned to a level 1 sport had an adjusted 4.3 times greater ACL reinjury rate than those who didn’t, Dr. Risberg noted at the congress sponsored by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.

The good news is that this sharply increased reinjury risk was mitigated if return to a level 1 sport was delayed for at least 9 months post surgery and if the patient had regained quadriceps strength comparable to the uninjured side. For every month that return to sport was delayed out until 9 months post ACL reconstruction, the knee reinjury rate was reduced by 51% (Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:804-8).

In a meta-analysis by other investigators of 12 studies including 5,707 participants, weakness of the knee extensor muscles was independently associated with a 1.65 times increased risk of developing KOA (Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Feb;23[2]:171-7).

Attend to BMI

A discussion of the importance of maintaining a healthy body weight is an important aspect of patient education for athletes with knee injuries. In a cohort study of 988 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction, being overweight or obese was associated with a significantly increased risk of subsequent meniscal tears and chondral lesions (Am J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;43[12]:2966-73).

Also, it’s well established that obesity is a risk factor for knee OA, and Canadian investigators have shown that young athletes with a sports-related intra-articular knee injury were 3.75 times more likely to be overweight or obese 3-10 years post injury, compared with matched uninjured controls (Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Jul;23[7]:1122-9).

Consider prehabilitative exercise training

Dr. Risberg and coinvestigators have reported that preoperative quadriceps muscle strength deficits are predictive of impaired knee function, as measured by the Cincinnati Knee Score 2 years post surgery. She said she believes ACL reconstruction shouldn’t be done until quadriceps muscle strength is at least 80% of that in the uninjured limb (Br J Sports Med. 2009 May;43[5]:371-6). She and her coinvestigators have published the details of a 5-week progressive exercise therapy program in which they have shown results in significantly improved early postoperative knee function (J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Nov;40[11]:705-21). They now try to have patients complete the twice-weekly, 5-week program before final decisions are reached regarding whether to have ACL reconstruction.

Test all before okaying return to sport

It’s important to know if patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction have gotten full knee function back before determining if they’re ready for full-on sports participation. In the Delaware-Oslo Cohort Study, patients who delayed their return until at least 9 months after surgery and passed the return-to-sports test had a 5.6% reinjury rate within 2 years, while those who failed the return-to-sports criteria had a 38.2% ACL reinjury rate.

 

 

The return-to-sports testing utilized in this study entailed isokinetic quadriceps strength testing, the single hop leg test, the 14-item self-rated Knee Outcome Survey–Activities of Daily Living Scale, and a self-rated Global Rating Scale of perceived function on a 0-100 scale. To be cleared for return to sports, a patient had to demonstrate having regained at least 90% of quadriceps muscle strength and hop performance along with scoring in the normative range on both of the self-rating instruments.

Surgical vs. nonsurgical treatment of ACL rupture

The evidence on this score is conflicting, according to Dr. Risberg. While most physical therapists believe ACL reconstruction doesn’t protect against later development of KOA, as reflected in a meta-analysis of published studies (J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 19;96[4]:292-300), a more recent retrospective comparison of 964 patients with an isolated ACL tear and an equal number of matched controls concluded that patients treated nonoperatively were six times more likely to have been diagnosed with KOA and 16.7 times more likely to have undergone total knee replacement at a mean follow-up of 13.7 years than were those treated with ACL reconstruction (Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;44[7]:1699-707).

Dr. Risberg’s fellow panelist Jackie Whittaker, PhD, said that, as long as quadriceps muscle strengthening is a priority, it makes sense to strengthen the hamstring as well, particularly if the ACL reconstruction utilized the hamstring tendon.

“Also, I would add that it’s important to develop a relationship with these ACL-injured people, who are often very young. Preventing a disease that they’re going to get 20 years later isn’t a priority for them. You need to develop that relationship and build it up over time. Helping them set realistic expectations is very important. And we need to do what we can to help them find some sort of competitive outlet. A lot of these kids were very competitive, and now they’ve had an injury and can’t compete. They don’t want to go back to playing just any sport. They want to be able to be competitive, and if you don’t help them find another way to express that, they sort of give up on physical activity altogether,” according to Dr. Whittaker of the University of Alberta in Edmonton.

Dr. Risberg and Dr. Whittaker reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

 

– A variety of evidence-based strategies are available for preventing posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in patients who have already sustained an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. And they’re generally ignored, according to May Arna Risberg, PhD.

“We have a lot of knowledge. We can use secondary prevention strategies. And here I think we, as physical therapists, physicians, and orthopedic surgeons, are doing a lousy job because we are sending these ACL-injured patients back to sports before they have normalized knee function and quadriceps strength,” said Dr. Risberg, professor of sports medicine at the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences in Oslo.

With no proven disease-modifying therapy for KOA available to date, secondary prevention of posttraumatic KOA is worthy of high-priority status, she said at the World Congress on Osteoarthritis. An estimated 250,00 ACL injuries occur annually in the United States, and up to one-half of affected patients, most of whom are young, active people, will experience a second ACL rupture within the first few years after undergoing their initial reconstruction. This second ACL injury greatly increases their risk of developing posttraumatic KOA within 15-20 years, while they are still relatively young, she said.

Moreover, if the second ACL injury involves meniscus surgery, the 5-year risk of posttraumatic KOA roughly triples to up to 48%.

She highlighted a few effective strategies for preventing posttraumatic KOA in patients who already have an ACL injury.

Avoid reinjury

Dr. Risberg was senior author of a recent report from the prospective Delaware-Oslo Cohort Study involving 106 athletes who underwent ACL reconstruction following injury in what she termed level I sports. These are sports that entail lots of pivoting, jumping, and hard cutting, such as basketball, soccer, and handball.

In the first 2 years after ACL repair, 30% of patients who returned to participation in a level 1 sport experienced an ACL reinjury, compared with just 8% who opted for a lower-level sport. Athletes who returned to a level 1 sport had an adjusted 4.3 times greater ACL reinjury rate than those who didn’t, Dr. Risberg noted at the congress sponsored by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.

The good news is that this sharply increased reinjury risk was mitigated if return to a level 1 sport was delayed for at least 9 months post surgery and if the patient had regained quadriceps strength comparable to the uninjured side. For every month that return to sport was delayed out until 9 months post ACL reconstruction, the knee reinjury rate was reduced by 51% (Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:804-8).

In a meta-analysis by other investigators of 12 studies including 5,707 participants, weakness of the knee extensor muscles was independently associated with a 1.65 times increased risk of developing KOA (Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Feb;23[2]:171-7).

Attend to BMI

A discussion of the importance of maintaining a healthy body weight is an important aspect of patient education for athletes with knee injuries. In a cohort study of 988 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction, being overweight or obese was associated with a significantly increased risk of subsequent meniscal tears and chondral lesions (Am J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;43[12]:2966-73).

Also, it’s well established that obesity is a risk factor for knee OA, and Canadian investigators have shown that young athletes with a sports-related intra-articular knee injury were 3.75 times more likely to be overweight or obese 3-10 years post injury, compared with matched uninjured controls (Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Jul;23[7]:1122-9).

Consider prehabilitative exercise training

Dr. Risberg and coinvestigators have reported that preoperative quadriceps muscle strength deficits are predictive of impaired knee function, as measured by the Cincinnati Knee Score 2 years post surgery. She said she believes ACL reconstruction shouldn’t be done until quadriceps muscle strength is at least 80% of that in the uninjured limb (Br J Sports Med. 2009 May;43[5]:371-6). She and her coinvestigators have published the details of a 5-week progressive exercise therapy program in which they have shown results in significantly improved early postoperative knee function (J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Nov;40[11]:705-21). They now try to have patients complete the twice-weekly, 5-week program before final decisions are reached regarding whether to have ACL reconstruction.

Test all before okaying return to sport

It’s important to know if patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction have gotten full knee function back before determining if they’re ready for full-on sports participation. In the Delaware-Oslo Cohort Study, patients who delayed their return until at least 9 months after surgery and passed the return-to-sports test had a 5.6% reinjury rate within 2 years, while those who failed the return-to-sports criteria had a 38.2% ACL reinjury rate.

 

 

The return-to-sports testing utilized in this study entailed isokinetic quadriceps strength testing, the single hop leg test, the 14-item self-rated Knee Outcome Survey–Activities of Daily Living Scale, and a self-rated Global Rating Scale of perceived function on a 0-100 scale. To be cleared for return to sports, a patient had to demonstrate having regained at least 90% of quadriceps muscle strength and hop performance along with scoring in the normative range on both of the self-rating instruments.

Surgical vs. nonsurgical treatment of ACL rupture

The evidence on this score is conflicting, according to Dr. Risberg. While most physical therapists believe ACL reconstruction doesn’t protect against later development of KOA, as reflected in a meta-analysis of published studies (J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 19;96[4]:292-300), a more recent retrospective comparison of 964 patients with an isolated ACL tear and an equal number of matched controls concluded that patients treated nonoperatively were six times more likely to have been diagnosed with KOA and 16.7 times more likely to have undergone total knee replacement at a mean follow-up of 13.7 years than were those treated with ACL reconstruction (Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;44[7]:1699-707).

Dr. Risberg’s fellow panelist Jackie Whittaker, PhD, said that, as long as quadriceps muscle strengthening is a priority, it makes sense to strengthen the hamstring as well, particularly if the ACL reconstruction utilized the hamstring tendon.

“Also, I would add that it’s important to develop a relationship with these ACL-injured people, who are often very young. Preventing a disease that they’re going to get 20 years later isn’t a priority for them. You need to develop that relationship and build it up over time. Helping them set realistic expectations is very important. And we need to do what we can to help them find some sort of competitive outlet. A lot of these kids were very competitive, and now they’ve had an injury and can’t compete. They don’t want to go back to playing just any sport. They want to be able to be competitive, and if you don’t help them find another way to express that, they sort of give up on physical activity altogether,” according to Dr. Whittaker of the University of Alberta in Edmonton.

Dr. Risberg and Dr. Whittaker reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM OARSI 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Newly Diagnosed Patients with Epilepsy Need Psychiatric Evaluation

Article Type
Changed
Pre-existing psychiatric disorders and iatrogenically induced symptoms warrant such evaluations.

Every patient who is initially diagnosed with epilepsy should also be evaluated for coexisting psychiatric problems, according to Andres Kanner with the Department of Neurology, University of Miami School of Medicine. Kanner noted that psychiatric comorbidities often existed in patients before they were diagnosed with a seizure. That, coupled with the fact that drug therapy and surgery for epilepsy often cause psychiatric symptoms, is part of the justification for conducting these evaluations.

Kanner AM. Psychiatric comorbidities in new onset epilepsy: Should they be always investigated? Seizure. 2017;49:79-82.

Publications
Sections
Pre-existing psychiatric disorders and iatrogenically induced symptoms warrant such evaluations.
Pre-existing psychiatric disorders and iatrogenically induced symptoms warrant such evaluations.

Every patient who is initially diagnosed with epilepsy should also be evaluated for coexisting psychiatric problems, according to Andres Kanner with the Department of Neurology, University of Miami School of Medicine. Kanner noted that psychiatric comorbidities often existed in patients before they were diagnosed with a seizure. That, coupled with the fact that drug therapy and surgery for epilepsy often cause psychiatric symptoms, is part of the justification for conducting these evaluations.

Kanner AM. Psychiatric comorbidities in new onset epilepsy: Should they be always investigated? Seizure. 2017;49:79-82.

Every patient who is initially diagnosed with epilepsy should also be evaluated for coexisting psychiatric problems, according to Andres Kanner with the Department of Neurology, University of Miami School of Medicine. Kanner noted that psychiatric comorbidities often existed in patients before they were diagnosed with a seizure. That, coupled with the fact that drug therapy and surgery for epilepsy often cause psychiatric symptoms, is part of the justification for conducting these evaluations.

Kanner AM. Psychiatric comorbidities in new onset epilepsy: Should they be always investigated? Seizure. 2017;49:79-82.

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Similar Adverse Effects Reported in Generic vs Brand AEDs

Article Type
Changed
Differences in reported AEs were likely due to biases against unapproved generics.

Although a recent analysis of adverse effects (AEs) found differences between AEs reported for generic versions compared with brand name versions of the 3 common antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), when approved generic formulations were compared to unapproved generics, reporting odds ratios were similar for authorized generic AEDs and generic AEDs. The researchers concluded that the differences were the result of perception biases. There were differences in drug AE reports of suicide and suicide ideation between authorized generic and brand name drugs that could not be explained by bias.

Rahman MM, Alatawi Y, Cheng N, et al. Comparison of brand versus generic antiepileptic drug adverse event reporting rates in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) [published online June 3, 2017]. Epilepsy Res. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.06.007

Publications
Sections
Differences in reported AEs were likely due to biases against unapproved generics.
Differences in reported AEs were likely due to biases against unapproved generics.

Although a recent analysis of adverse effects (AEs) found differences between AEs reported for generic versions compared with brand name versions of the 3 common antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), when approved generic formulations were compared to unapproved generics, reporting odds ratios were similar for authorized generic AEDs and generic AEDs. The researchers concluded that the differences were the result of perception biases. There were differences in drug AE reports of suicide and suicide ideation between authorized generic and brand name drugs that could not be explained by bias.

Rahman MM, Alatawi Y, Cheng N, et al. Comparison of brand versus generic antiepileptic drug adverse event reporting rates in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) [published online June 3, 2017]. Epilepsy Res. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.06.007

Although a recent analysis of adverse effects (AEs) found differences between AEs reported for generic versions compared with brand name versions of the 3 common antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), when approved generic formulations were compared to unapproved generics, reporting odds ratios were similar for authorized generic AEDs and generic AEDs. The researchers concluded that the differences were the result of perception biases. There were differences in drug AE reports of suicide and suicide ideation between authorized generic and brand name drugs that could not be explained by bias.

Rahman MM, Alatawi Y, Cheng N, et al. Comparison of brand versus generic antiepileptic drug adverse event reporting rates in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) [published online June 3, 2017]. Epilepsy Res. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.06.007

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Stress Linked to Recurrent Seizures in Adults

Article Type
Changed
Anxiety and mood disorders both increase the likelihood of a repeat event.

The likelihood of experiencing a recurrent seizure is closely linked to a person’s stress level, according to a recent study that looked at 52 individuals with a single unprovoked seizure and 29 with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The researchers, who looked at adult residents in low-income areas of Northern Manhattan and Harlem, New York City, found that generalized anxiety disorder increased the risk of a recurrent seizure threefold. In a second analysis, a mood disorder more than doubled the risk of a recurrent seizure.    

Baldin E, Hauser WS, Pack A, Hesdorffer DC. Stress is associated with an increased risk of recurrent seizures in adults. Epilepsia. 2017;58:1037-1046.

Publications
Sections
Anxiety and mood disorders both increase the likelihood of a repeat event.
Anxiety and mood disorders both increase the likelihood of a repeat event.

The likelihood of experiencing a recurrent seizure is closely linked to a person’s stress level, according to a recent study that looked at 52 individuals with a single unprovoked seizure and 29 with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The researchers, who looked at adult residents in low-income areas of Northern Manhattan and Harlem, New York City, found that generalized anxiety disorder increased the risk of a recurrent seizure threefold. In a second analysis, a mood disorder more than doubled the risk of a recurrent seizure.    

Baldin E, Hauser WS, Pack A, Hesdorffer DC. Stress is associated with an increased risk of recurrent seizures in adults. Epilepsia. 2017;58:1037-1046.

The likelihood of experiencing a recurrent seizure is closely linked to a person’s stress level, according to a recent study that looked at 52 individuals with a single unprovoked seizure and 29 with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The researchers, who looked at adult residents in low-income areas of Northern Manhattan and Harlem, New York City, found that generalized anxiety disorder increased the risk of a recurrent seizure threefold. In a second analysis, a mood disorder more than doubled the risk of a recurrent seizure.    

Baldin E, Hauser WS, Pack A, Hesdorffer DC. Stress is associated with an increased risk of recurrent seizures in adults. Epilepsia. 2017;58:1037-1046.

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

SPRINT: Intensive BP control cut cardiovascular risk in patients with prediabetes

Article Type
Changed

 

– Treating systolic hypertension to a target of 120 mm Hg instead of 140 mm Hg significantly reduced the rate of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with prediabetes, according to a post-hoc analysis of the multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).

Dr. Adam P. Bress
Clinicians continue to debate optimal SBP targets, especially in patients with diabetes or prediabetes. SPRINT, which was conducted at 102 clinical sites in the United States, randomly assigned adults aged 50 years and older who had a high risk of cardiovascular disease and average baseline SBPs of 130 to 180 mm Hg to antihypertensive therapy targeted to less than 140 mm Hg (standard control) or less than 120 mm Hg (intensive control). The primary endpoint was a composite of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome without myocardial infarction, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, and cardiovascular death. These outcomes affected about 1.6% of intensive control patients and 2.2% of standard control patients in the SPRINT trial each year (hazard ratio, 0.75; P less than .001) – a difference so stark that investigators stopped the trial early (N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103-16).

In contrast, intensive SBP control did not prevent cardiovascular events, compared with standard control among diabetic patients in the randomized, nonblinded ACCORD BP trial (N Engl J Med. 2010; 362:1575-85).

To help clarify SBP targets for prediabetic individuals, Dr. Bress and his associates parsed cardiovascular outcomes in SPRINT based on baseline fasting serum glucose (FSG) levels. More than 5,400 normoglycemic (average FSG, 91 mg per dL) patients and more than 3,800 prediabetic (average FSG, 110 mg per dL) patients were followed for a median of 3.3 years, after which 101 (1.6%) prediabetic intensive control patients and 144 (2.3%) prediabetic standard control patients experienced the combined primary endpoint (HR, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.9). The hazard ratio for normoglycemic patients was similar (0.9) and approached statistical significance.

Intensive SBP control also was associated with lower rates of individual cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality, compared with standard control in both normoglycemic and prediabetic patients, Dr. Bress and his associates reported. Wide confidence intervals precluded statistical significance for most individual outcomes, but intensive control was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality in normoglycemic patients (0.7% vs. 1.4% with standard control; HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9).

Serious adverse events affected about 37% of patients in all subgroups. Hypotension, syncope, bradycardia, and electrolyte abnormalities were slightly more common in the intensive control groups than the standard control groups, regardless of baseline FPG levels.

SPRINT was sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and Wake Forest University Health Sciences provided additional support. Dr. Bress disclosed research support from Novartis and the National Institutes of Health.
Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Treating systolic hypertension to a target of 120 mm Hg instead of 140 mm Hg significantly reduced the rate of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with prediabetes, according to a post-hoc analysis of the multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).

Dr. Adam P. Bress
Clinicians continue to debate optimal SBP targets, especially in patients with diabetes or prediabetes. SPRINT, which was conducted at 102 clinical sites in the United States, randomly assigned adults aged 50 years and older who had a high risk of cardiovascular disease and average baseline SBPs of 130 to 180 mm Hg to antihypertensive therapy targeted to less than 140 mm Hg (standard control) or less than 120 mm Hg (intensive control). The primary endpoint was a composite of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome without myocardial infarction, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, and cardiovascular death. These outcomes affected about 1.6% of intensive control patients and 2.2% of standard control patients in the SPRINT trial each year (hazard ratio, 0.75; P less than .001) – a difference so stark that investigators stopped the trial early (N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103-16).

In contrast, intensive SBP control did not prevent cardiovascular events, compared with standard control among diabetic patients in the randomized, nonblinded ACCORD BP trial (N Engl J Med. 2010; 362:1575-85).

To help clarify SBP targets for prediabetic individuals, Dr. Bress and his associates parsed cardiovascular outcomes in SPRINT based on baseline fasting serum glucose (FSG) levels. More than 5,400 normoglycemic (average FSG, 91 mg per dL) patients and more than 3,800 prediabetic (average FSG, 110 mg per dL) patients were followed for a median of 3.3 years, after which 101 (1.6%) prediabetic intensive control patients and 144 (2.3%) prediabetic standard control patients experienced the combined primary endpoint (HR, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.9). The hazard ratio for normoglycemic patients was similar (0.9) and approached statistical significance.

Intensive SBP control also was associated with lower rates of individual cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality, compared with standard control in both normoglycemic and prediabetic patients, Dr. Bress and his associates reported. Wide confidence intervals precluded statistical significance for most individual outcomes, but intensive control was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality in normoglycemic patients (0.7% vs. 1.4% with standard control; HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9).

Serious adverse events affected about 37% of patients in all subgroups. Hypotension, syncope, bradycardia, and electrolyte abnormalities were slightly more common in the intensive control groups than the standard control groups, regardless of baseline FPG levels.

SPRINT was sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and Wake Forest University Health Sciences provided additional support. Dr. Bress disclosed research support from Novartis and the National Institutes of Health.

 

– Treating systolic hypertension to a target of 120 mm Hg instead of 140 mm Hg significantly reduced the rate of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with prediabetes, according to a post-hoc analysis of the multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).

Dr. Adam P. Bress
Clinicians continue to debate optimal SBP targets, especially in patients with diabetes or prediabetes. SPRINT, which was conducted at 102 clinical sites in the United States, randomly assigned adults aged 50 years and older who had a high risk of cardiovascular disease and average baseline SBPs of 130 to 180 mm Hg to antihypertensive therapy targeted to less than 140 mm Hg (standard control) or less than 120 mm Hg (intensive control). The primary endpoint was a composite of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome without myocardial infarction, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, and cardiovascular death. These outcomes affected about 1.6% of intensive control patients and 2.2% of standard control patients in the SPRINT trial each year (hazard ratio, 0.75; P less than .001) – a difference so stark that investigators stopped the trial early (N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103-16).

In contrast, intensive SBP control did not prevent cardiovascular events, compared with standard control among diabetic patients in the randomized, nonblinded ACCORD BP trial (N Engl J Med. 2010; 362:1575-85).

To help clarify SBP targets for prediabetic individuals, Dr. Bress and his associates parsed cardiovascular outcomes in SPRINT based on baseline fasting serum glucose (FSG) levels. More than 5,400 normoglycemic (average FSG, 91 mg per dL) patients and more than 3,800 prediabetic (average FSG, 110 mg per dL) patients were followed for a median of 3.3 years, after which 101 (1.6%) prediabetic intensive control patients and 144 (2.3%) prediabetic standard control patients experienced the combined primary endpoint (HR, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.9). The hazard ratio for normoglycemic patients was similar (0.9) and approached statistical significance.

Intensive SBP control also was associated with lower rates of individual cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality, compared with standard control in both normoglycemic and prediabetic patients, Dr. Bress and his associates reported. Wide confidence intervals precluded statistical significance for most individual outcomes, but intensive control was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality in normoglycemic patients (0.7% vs. 1.4% with standard control; HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9).

Serious adverse events affected about 37% of patients in all subgroups. Hypotension, syncope, bradycardia, and electrolyte abnormalities were slightly more common in the intensive control groups than the standard control groups, regardless of baseline FPG levels.

SPRINT was sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and Wake Forest University Health Sciences provided additional support. Dr. Bress disclosed research support from Novartis and the National Institutes of Health.
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

AT THE ADA ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Treating systolic hypertension to a target of 120 mm Hg instead of 140 mm Hg significantly reduced the rate of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with prediabetes.

Major finding: After a median of 3.3 years, 1.6% of patients with prediabetes in the intensive control group and 2.2% of patients with prediabetes in the standard control group experienced myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome without myocardial infarction, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, or cardiovascular death.

Data source: SPRINT, a randomized, controlled, open-label trial comparing systolic blood pressure targets of less than 140 mm Hg (standard control) and less than 120 mm Hg (intensive control) in hypertensive patients without clinical diabetes who were older than 50 years and at high risk for cardiovascular disease.

Disclosures: SPRINT was sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and Wake Forest University Health Sciences provided additional support. Dr. Bress disclosed research support from Novartis and the National Institutes of Health.

Hospitalist movers and shakers - June/July 2017

Article Type
Changed

 

Three members of the hospital medicine community – Thiruvoipati Nanda Kumar, MD; Anthony Aghenta, MD, MS, FACP; and Angela Aboutalib, MD – recently were honored for their work by the International Association of HealthCare Professionals, earning spots in its publication, The Leading Physicians of the World.

Hospitalist and internist Dr. Nanda Kumar serves patients at Vibra Hospital in Redding, Calif., where he is also a clinical associate professor at the University of California at Davis. He is a member of both the Society of Hospital Medicine and the American Diabetes Association.

Dr. Aghenta is a 17-year veteran internist who currently serves as medical director for Coronado Healthcare Center in Phoenix. There, he also is affiliated with St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center. A member of SHM, Dr. Aghenta also has the title of Fellow of the American College of Physicians.

Dr. Aboutalib, whose experience as an internist includes expertise in hospital medicine, serves as hospitalist and medical director of clinical operations at U.S. Acute Care Solutions, Canton, Ohio. Previously, this member of the American College of Physicians served South Physicians as a hospitalist at Mercy Hospital in Chicago.
 

Andrew Dunn, MD, MPH, FACP, SFHM, recently was named chair-elect of the Board of Regents of the American College of Physicians (ACP), the national organization of internists. He assumed the role at the start of the ACP’s annual scientific meeting held in San Diego, March 30–April 1.

Dr. Andrew Dunn
Dr. Dunn is chief of hospital medicine of the Mount Sinai Health System, New York, and serves as professor of medicine at the Icahn Mount Sinai School of Medicine. He has been an ACP Board of Regents member and was chair of its Board of Governors, as well as governor of the ACP’s Manhattan/Bronx chapter.
 

Susan Herson, MD, has been named the new chief of staff at the Bath, N.Y., Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Dr. Herson comes to Bath from the Sioux Falls (S.D.) VA, where she was a hospitalist, a hospitalist-clinician educator, and medical director of clinical documentation improvement, while also serving as clinical assistant professor for New York Medical College and medical director at Norwalk (Conn.) Hospital.

Dr. Herson served in the U.S. Navy, doing her training at Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, Md. She was a general medical officer while stationed at U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, N.C.
 

Chad Whelan, MD, has been elevated to president of the Loyola (Ill.) University Medical Center, moving up from his chair as senior vice president and chief medical officer. This longtime hospitalist also serves as a professor of medicine in the Loyola Chicago Stritch School of Medicine.

Dr. Chad Whelan
Dr. Whelan is a former director of hospital medicine at Loyola and has held various positions, including associate chief medical officer, at the University of Chicago. He is an associate editor of the Journal of Hospital Medicine.
 

Kevin Tulipana, DO, recently was promoted to medical director of hospital medicine at Cancer Treatment Centers of America’s Southwest Regional Medical Center in Tulsa, Okla. Previously, Dr. Tulipana was a hospitalist in the special care unit at CTCA Tulsa.

Mustafa Sardini, MD, has been named Envision Physician Services’ 2017 Hospital Medicine Physician of the Year. Dr. Sardini is the site medical director as Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Sunnyvale, Texas. EPS presents the award to a hospitalist who peers deem as a leader in the industry.
 

Business moves

Physicians’ Alliance, (PAL) recently announced plans to partner with Penn State Health. As the largest independent physician group in Lancaster County, Pa., they will bring its more than 120 physicians, hospitalists, and dieticians to central Pennsylvania giant Penn State.

The alliance will allow patients of PAL physicians access to advanced care at Milton S. Hershey Medical Center and Penn State Children’s Hospital in Hershey.
 

Envision Healthcare, Greenwood Village, Colo. has created the Envision Physical Services (EPS) as a result of a merger with AmSurg ambulatory surgical center in December 2016. EPS combines EmCare and Sheridan Healthcare’s physician services divisions.

EPS specializes in hospital medicine, anesthesia, emergency medicine, radiology, and surgical services.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Three members of the hospital medicine community – Thiruvoipati Nanda Kumar, MD; Anthony Aghenta, MD, MS, FACP; and Angela Aboutalib, MD – recently were honored for their work by the International Association of HealthCare Professionals, earning spots in its publication, The Leading Physicians of the World.

Hospitalist and internist Dr. Nanda Kumar serves patients at Vibra Hospital in Redding, Calif., where he is also a clinical associate professor at the University of California at Davis. He is a member of both the Society of Hospital Medicine and the American Diabetes Association.

Dr. Aghenta is a 17-year veteran internist who currently serves as medical director for Coronado Healthcare Center in Phoenix. There, he also is affiliated with St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center. A member of SHM, Dr. Aghenta also has the title of Fellow of the American College of Physicians.

Dr. Aboutalib, whose experience as an internist includes expertise in hospital medicine, serves as hospitalist and medical director of clinical operations at U.S. Acute Care Solutions, Canton, Ohio. Previously, this member of the American College of Physicians served South Physicians as a hospitalist at Mercy Hospital in Chicago.
 

Andrew Dunn, MD, MPH, FACP, SFHM, recently was named chair-elect of the Board of Regents of the American College of Physicians (ACP), the national organization of internists. He assumed the role at the start of the ACP’s annual scientific meeting held in San Diego, March 30–April 1.

Dr. Andrew Dunn
Dr. Dunn is chief of hospital medicine of the Mount Sinai Health System, New York, and serves as professor of medicine at the Icahn Mount Sinai School of Medicine. He has been an ACP Board of Regents member and was chair of its Board of Governors, as well as governor of the ACP’s Manhattan/Bronx chapter.
 

Susan Herson, MD, has been named the new chief of staff at the Bath, N.Y., Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Dr. Herson comes to Bath from the Sioux Falls (S.D.) VA, where she was a hospitalist, a hospitalist-clinician educator, and medical director of clinical documentation improvement, while also serving as clinical assistant professor for New York Medical College and medical director at Norwalk (Conn.) Hospital.

Dr. Herson served in the U.S. Navy, doing her training at Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, Md. She was a general medical officer while stationed at U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, N.C.
 

Chad Whelan, MD, has been elevated to president of the Loyola (Ill.) University Medical Center, moving up from his chair as senior vice president and chief medical officer. This longtime hospitalist also serves as a professor of medicine in the Loyola Chicago Stritch School of Medicine.

Dr. Chad Whelan
Dr. Whelan is a former director of hospital medicine at Loyola and has held various positions, including associate chief medical officer, at the University of Chicago. He is an associate editor of the Journal of Hospital Medicine.
 

Kevin Tulipana, DO, recently was promoted to medical director of hospital medicine at Cancer Treatment Centers of America’s Southwest Regional Medical Center in Tulsa, Okla. Previously, Dr. Tulipana was a hospitalist in the special care unit at CTCA Tulsa.

Mustafa Sardini, MD, has been named Envision Physician Services’ 2017 Hospital Medicine Physician of the Year. Dr. Sardini is the site medical director as Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Sunnyvale, Texas. EPS presents the award to a hospitalist who peers deem as a leader in the industry.
 

Business moves

Physicians’ Alliance, (PAL) recently announced plans to partner with Penn State Health. As the largest independent physician group in Lancaster County, Pa., they will bring its more than 120 physicians, hospitalists, and dieticians to central Pennsylvania giant Penn State.

The alliance will allow patients of PAL physicians access to advanced care at Milton S. Hershey Medical Center and Penn State Children’s Hospital in Hershey.
 

Envision Healthcare, Greenwood Village, Colo. has created the Envision Physical Services (EPS) as a result of a merger with AmSurg ambulatory surgical center in December 2016. EPS combines EmCare and Sheridan Healthcare’s physician services divisions.

EPS specializes in hospital medicine, anesthesia, emergency medicine, radiology, and surgical services.

 

Three members of the hospital medicine community – Thiruvoipati Nanda Kumar, MD; Anthony Aghenta, MD, MS, FACP; and Angela Aboutalib, MD – recently were honored for their work by the International Association of HealthCare Professionals, earning spots in its publication, The Leading Physicians of the World.

Hospitalist and internist Dr. Nanda Kumar serves patients at Vibra Hospital in Redding, Calif., where he is also a clinical associate professor at the University of California at Davis. He is a member of both the Society of Hospital Medicine and the American Diabetes Association.

Dr. Aghenta is a 17-year veteran internist who currently serves as medical director for Coronado Healthcare Center in Phoenix. There, he also is affiliated with St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center. A member of SHM, Dr. Aghenta also has the title of Fellow of the American College of Physicians.

Dr. Aboutalib, whose experience as an internist includes expertise in hospital medicine, serves as hospitalist and medical director of clinical operations at U.S. Acute Care Solutions, Canton, Ohio. Previously, this member of the American College of Physicians served South Physicians as a hospitalist at Mercy Hospital in Chicago.
 

Andrew Dunn, MD, MPH, FACP, SFHM, recently was named chair-elect of the Board of Regents of the American College of Physicians (ACP), the national organization of internists. He assumed the role at the start of the ACP’s annual scientific meeting held in San Diego, March 30–April 1.

Dr. Andrew Dunn
Dr. Dunn is chief of hospital medicine of the Mount Sinai Health System, New York, and serves as professor of medicine at the Icahn Mount Sinai School of Medicine. He has been an ACP Board of Regents member and was chair of its Board of Governors, as well as governor of the ACP’s Manhattan/Bronx chapter.
 

Susan Herson, MD, has been named the new chief of staff at the Bath, N.Y., Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Dr. Herson comes to Bath from the Sioux Falls (S.D.) VA, where she was a hospitalist, a hospitalist-clinician educator, and medical director of clinical documentation improvement, while also serving as clinical assistant professor for New York Medical College and medical director at Norwalk (Conn.) Hospital.

Dr. Herson served in the U.S. Navy, doing her training at Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, Md. She was a general medical officer while stationed at U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, N.C.
 

Chad Whelan, MD, has been elevated to president of the Loyola (Ill.) University Medical Center, moving up from his chair as senior vice president and chief medical officer. This longtime hospitalist also serves as a professor of medicine in the Loyola Chicago Stritch School of Medicine.

Dr. Chad Whelan
Dr. Whelan is a former director of hospital medicine at Loyola and has held various positions, including associate chief medical officer, at the University of Chicago. He is an associate editor of the Journal of Hospital Medicine.
 

Kevin Tulipana, DO, recently was promoted to medical director of hospital medicine at Cancer Treatment Centers of America’s Southwest Regional Medical Center in Tulsa, Okla. Previously, Dr. Tulipana was a hospitalist in the special care unit at CTCA Tulsa.

Mustafa Sardini, MD, has been named Envision Physician Services’ 2017 Hospital Medicine Physician of the Year. Dr. Sardini is the site medical director as Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Sunnyvale, Texas. EPS presents the award to a hospitalist who peers deem as a leader in the industry.
 

Business moves

Physicians’ Alliance, (PAL) recently announced plans to partner with Penn State Health. As the largest independent physician group in Lancaster County, Pa., they will bring its more than 120 physicians, hospitalists, and dieticians to central Pennsylvania giant Penn State.

The alliance will allow patients of PAL physicians access to advanced care at Milton S. Hershey Medical Center and Penn State Children’s Hospital in Hershey.
 

Envision Healthcare, Greenwood Village, Colo. has created the Envision Physical Services (EPS) as a result of a merger with AmSurg ambulatory surgical center in December 2016. EPS combines EmCare and Sheridan Healthcare’s physician services divisions.

EPS specializes in hospital medicine, anesthesia, emergency medicine, radiology, and surgical services.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica

Surgeon volume tied to mitral valve surgery outcomes

Article Type
Changed

 

CHICAGO – A total annual surgeon volume of fewer than 25 operations was associated with increased 1-year mortality and reoperation rates, according to a study presented at the 2017 American Association for Thoracic Surgery Centennial.

Improvements in repair rates, survival, and freedom from reoperation increased with increasing surgeon case volumes, Joanna Chikwe, MD, and her colleagues at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, stated.

Dr. Joanna Chikwe
The study analyzed 5,475 adult patients who underwent primary mitral valve operations (replacement or repair) in New York state between Jan. 1, 2002, and Dec. 31, 2013. Patients in the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedure codes 35.23 and 35.24 for replacement and ICD-9-CM codes 35.12 and 35.33 for repair.

The researchers compared repair rates, long-term survival, and risk of postrepair reoperation in patients with degenerative disease according to total annual surgeon volume, which was defined as any mitral valve operation for any cause during the study period. The study was simultaneously published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2017 May 16;69[19]:2397-406).

Mitral valve repair is the preferred treatment, compared with valve replacement, for the treatment of severe mitral valve regurgitation in patients who have degenerative valve disease with mitral valve prolapse, and both U.S. and European guidelines strongly recommend valve repair whenever possible, according to Dr. Chikwe and her colleagues.

But, “mitral valve replacement unfortunately remains relatively common in patients with degenerative valve disease,” they stated.

A total of 313 surgeons from 41 institutions met the study eligibility criteria, according to the researchers. They performed a median of 10 mitral valve operations per year (range, 1-230). The median annual institutional mitral valve volume was 59 mitral valve operations, ranging from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 310 operations. Repair rates for primary mitral valve operations for any cause at all 41 institutions varied from 15% to 83%, and repair rates for degenerative mitral valve operations varied from 25% to 100%.

In the study cohort, surgeons with a total annual volume of less than 25 operations carried out 25% of procedures.

After multivariable adjustment, total annual surgeon volume was independently associated with the probability of mitral valve repair. The chance of repair increased significantly by 13% for every 10-case increment in total annual surgeon volume (P less than .001).

In addition, compared with patients operated on by surgeons with a total annual surgeon volume of 10 or fewer operations, patients operated on by surgeons with a total annual surgeon volume of greater than 50 operations were more than three times as likely to undergo mitral valve repair rather than replacement.

A total annual surgeon volume of less than 25 operations was associated with lower mitral valve repair rates and with increased 1-year mortality and mitral valve reoperation rates. Improvements in repair rates, survival, and freedom from reoperation increased with increasing surgeon case volumes.

After 1 year of repair or replacement, the actuarial survival of patients with degenerative mitral valve disease who were operated on by surgeons performing greater than 50 operations per year was 97.8%, compared with 94.1% for patients operated on by surgeons performing less than or equal to 10 operations a year.

Compared with replacement, mitral repair was significantly associated with better survival, but total annual surgeon volume still remained a significant independent predictor (P less than .001). In addition, for those patients who underwent mitral valve repair, total annual surgeon volume was a significant independent predictor of late death.

The results are important, the investigators noted, given that the median number of mitral valve operations performed annually by individual surgeons in the United States was five, according to an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database – and that, in New York state, most surgeons actually performed less than one mitral operation per month.

There were significant differences seen in the patient characteristics across surgeons’ case volume groups. The prevalence of congestive heart failure was significantly higher in patients operated on by surgeons with lower volumes, and the proportion of patients undergoing urgent surgery was also significantly higher for lower-volume surgeons.

“This leads to a double jeopardy, where sicker patients are adversely affected by the lower repair rates and poorer outcomes seen with lower-volume surgeons, and it underscores the need to refer the highest-risk patients to high-volume surgeons,” said Dr. Chickwe and her colleagues.

However, “even among high-volume surgeons, there was an observed variability of degenerative disease repair rates, ranging from 19% to nearly 100%,” they added. “This finding reflects that surgeon volume is not the only factor for better outcomes, and it emphasizes the need for more transparency of surgeon-related factors and outcomes of degenerative mitral valve surgery for patients and referring cardiologists.

“Considering that there was an incremental improvement in survival and probability of repair with increasing volume over 25 operations, one could make the argument that a minimum volume target of 50, or even more, operations would be optimal,” the researchers noted. “Developing more very high-volume surgeons experienced in mitral valve repair would likely be particularly beneficial for patients with complex but repairable mitral valve disease, and for asymptomatic patients whose repair feasibility would optimally approach 100%.”

Dr. David Adams is the national coprincipal investigator of the Core Valve United States Pivotal Trial, supported by Medtronic. Dr. Chikwe received speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. The other coauthors had no disclosures to report.
 
 

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

CHICAGO – A total annual surgeon volume of fewer than 25 operations was associated with increased 1-year mortality and reoperation rates, according to a study presented at the 2017 American Association for Thoracic Surgery Centennial.

Improvements in repair rates, survival, and freedom from reoperation increased with increasing surgeon case volumes, Joanna Chikwe, MD, and her colleagues at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, stated.

Dr. Joanna Chikwe
The study analyzed 5,475 adult patients who underwent primary mitral valve operations (replacement or repair) in New York state between Jan. 1, 2002, and Dec. 31, 2013. Patients in the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedure codes 35.23 and 35.24 for replacement and ICD-9-CM codes 35.12 and 35.33 for repair.

The researchers compared repair rates, long-term survival, and risk of postrepair reoperation in patients with degenerative disease according to total annual surgeon volume, which was defined as any mitral valve operation for any cause during the study period. The study was simultaneously published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2017 May 16;69[19]:2397-406).

Mitral valve repair is the preferred treatment, compared with valve replacement, for the treatment of severe mitral valve regurgitation in patients who have degenerative valve disease with mitral valve prolapse, and both U.S. and European guidelines strongly recommend valve repair whenever possible, according to Dr. Chikwe and her colleagues.

But, “mitral valve replacement unfortunately remains relatively common in patients with degenerative valve disease,” they stated.

A total of 313 surgeons from 41 institutions met the study eligibility criteria, according to the researchers. They performed a median of 10 mitral valve operations per year (range, 1-230). The median annual institutional mitral valve volume was 59 mitral valve operations, ranging from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 310 operations. Repair rates for primary mitral valve operations for any cause at all 41 institutions varied from 15% to 83%, and repair rates for degenerative mitral valve operations varied from 25% to 100%.

In the study cohort, surgeons with a total annual volume of less than 25 operations carried out 25% of procedures.

After multivariable adjustment, total annual surgeon volume was independently associated with the probability of mitral valve repair. The chance of repair increased significantly by 13% for every 10-case increment in total annual surgeon volume (P less than .001).

In addition, compared with patients operated on by surgeons with a total annual surgeon volume of 10 or fewer operations, patients operated on by surgeons with a total annual surgeon volume of greater than 50 operations were more than three times as likely to undergo mitral valve repair rather than replacement.

A total annual surgeon volume of less than 25 operations was associated with lower mitral valve repair rates and with increased 1-year mortality and mitral valve reoperation rates. Improvements in repair rates, survival, and freedom from reoperation increased with increasing surgeon case volumes.

After 1 year of repair or replacement, the actuarial survival of patients with degenerative mitral valve disease who were operated on by surgeons performing greater than 50 operations per year was 97.8%, compared with 94.1% for patients operated on by surgeons performing less than or equal to 10 operations a year.

Compared with replacement, mitral repair was significantly associated with better survival, but total annual surgeon volume still remained a significant independent predictor (P less than .001). In addition, for those patients who underwent mitral valve repair, total annual surgeon volume was a significant independent predictor of late death.

The results are important, the investigators noted, given that the median number of mitral valve operations performed annually by individual surgeons in the United States was five, according to an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database – and that, in New York state, most surgeons actually performed less than one mitral operation per month.

There were significant differences seen in the patient characteristics across surgeons’ case volume groups. The prevalence of congestive heart failure was significantly higher in patients operated on by surgeons with lower volumes, and the proportion of patients undergoing urgent surgery was also significantly higher for lower-volume surgeons.

“This leads to a double jeopardy, where sicker patients are adversely affected by the lower repair rates and poorer outcomes seen with lower-volume surgeons, and it underscores the need to refer the highest-risk patients to high-volume surgeons,” said Dr. Chickwe and her colleagues.

However, “even among high-volume surgeons, there was an observed variability of degenerative disease repair rates, ranging from 19% to nearly 100%,” they added. “This finding reflects that surgeon volume is not the only factor for better outcomes, and it emphasizes the need for more transparency of surgeon-related factors and outcomes of degenerative mitral valve surgery for patients and referring cardiologists.

“Considering that there was an incremental improvement in survival and probability of repair with increasing volume over 25 operations, one could make the argument that a minimum volume target of 50, or even more, operations would be optimal,” the researchers noted. “Developing more very high-volume surgeons experienced in mitral valve repair would likely be particularly beneficial for patients with complex but repairable mitral valve disease, and for asymptomatic patients whose repair feasibility would optimally approach 100%.”

Dr. David Adams is the national coprincipal investigator of the Core Valve United States Pivotal Trial, supported by Medtronic. Dr. Chikwe received speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. The other coauthors had no disclosures to report.
 
 

 

 

CHICAGO – A total annual surgeon volume of fewer than 25 operations was associated with increased 1-year mortality and reoperation rates, according to a study presented at the 2017 American Association for Thoracic Surgery Centennial.

Improvements in repair rates, survival, and freedom from reoperation increased with increasing surgeon case volumes, Joanna Chikwe, MD, and her colleagues at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, stated.

Dr. Joanna Chikwe
The study analyzed 5,475 adult patients who underwent primary mitral valve operations (replacement or repair) in New York state between Jan. 1, 2002, and Dec. 31, 2013. Patients in the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedure codes 35.23 and 35.24 for replacement and ICD-9-CM codes 35.12 and 35.33 for repair.

The researchers compared repair rates, long-term survival, and risk of postrepair reoperation in patients with degenerative disease according to total annual surgeon volume, which was defined as any mitral valve operation for any cause during the study period. The study was simultaneously published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2017 May 16;69[19]:2397-406).

Mitral valve repair is the preferred treatment, compared with valve replacement, for the treatment of severe mitral valve regurgitation in patients who have degenerative valve disease with mitral valve prolapse, and both U.S. and European guidelines strongly recommend valve repair whenever possible, according to Dr. Chikwe and her colleagues.

But, “mitral valve replacement unfortunately remains relatively common in patients with degenerative valve disease,” they stated.

A total of 313 surgeons from 41 institutions met the study eligibility criteria, according to the researchers. They performed a median of 10 mitral valve operations per year (range, 1-230). The median annual institutional mitral valve volume was 59 mitral valve operations, ranging from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 310 operations. Repair rates for primary mitral valve operations for any cause at all 41 institutions varied from 15% to 83%, and repair rates for degenerative mitral valve operations varied from 25% to 100%.

In the study cohort, surgeons with a total annual volume of less than 25 operations carried out 25% of procedures.

After multivariable adjustment, total annual surgeon volume was independently associated with the probability of mitral valve repair. The chance of repair increased significantly by 13% for every 10-case increment in total annual surgeon volume (P less than .001).

In addition, compared with patients operated on by surgeons with a total annual surgeon volume of 10 or fewer operations, patients operated on by surgeons with a total annual surgeon volume of greater than 50 operations were more than three times as likely to undergo mitral valve repair rather than replacement.

A total annual surgeon volume of less than 25 operations was associated with lower mitral valve repair rates and with increased 1-year mortality and mitral valve reoperation rates. Improvements in repair rates, survival, and freedom from reoperation increased with increasing surgeon case volumes.

After 1 year of repair or replacement, the actuarial survival of patients with degenerative mitral valve disease who were operated on by surgeons performing greater than 50 operations per year was 97.8%, compared with 94.1% for patients operated on by surgeons performing less than or equal to 10 operations a year.

Compared with replacement, mitral repair was significantly associated with better survival, but total annual surgeon volume still remained a significant independent predictor (P less than .001). In addition, for those patients who underwent mitral valve repair, total annual surgeon volume was a significant independent predictor of late death.

The results are important, the investigators noted, given that the median number of mitral valve operations performed annually by individual surgeons in the United States was five, according to an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database – and that, in New York state, most surgeons actually performed less than one mitral operation per month.

There were significant differences seen in the patient characteristics across surgeons’ case volume groups. The prevalence of congestive heart failure was significantly higher in patients operated on by surgeons with lower volumes, and the proportion of patients undergoing urgent surgery was also significantly higher for lower-volume surgeons.

“This leads to a double jeopardy, where sicker patients are adversely affected by the lower repair rates and poorer outcomes seen with lower-volume surgeons, and it underscores the need to refer the highest-risk patients to high-volume surgeons,” said Dr. Chickwe and her colleagues.

However, “even among high-volume surgeons, there was an observed variability of degenerative disease repair rates, ranging from 19% to nearly 100%,” they added. “This finding reflects that surgeon volume is not the only factor for better outcomes, and it emphasizes the need for more transparency of surgeon-related factors and outcomes of degenerative mitral valve surgery for patients and referring cardiologists.

“Considering that there was an incremental improvement in survival and probability of repair with increasing volume over 25 operations, one could make the argument that a minimum volume target of 50, or even more, operations would be optimal,” the researchers noted. “Developing more very high-volume surgeons experienced in mitral valve repair would likely be particularly beneficial for patients with complex but repairable mitral valve disease, and for asymptomatic patients whose repair feasibility would optimally approach 100%.”

Dr. David Adams is the national coprincipal investigator of the Core Valve United States Pivotal Trial, supported by Medtronic. Dr. Chikwe received speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. The other coauthors had no disclosures to report.
 
 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Active
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE AATS ANNUAL MEETING AND THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
CME ID
140945
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Mitral valve repair reoperation rates and 1-year survival improved with greater surgeon volume.

Major finding: Mitral valve reoperation rates steadily decreased with increasing surgeon volume until 25 operations per year, coupled to an improved 1-year survival for every 10 additional operations more than that.

Data source: A mandatory New York state database containing 5,475 patients who underwent mitral valve repair between 2002 and 2013.

Disclosures: Dr. David Adams is the national coprincipal investigator of the Core Valve United States Pivotal Trial, supported by Medtronic. Dr. Joanna Chikwe received speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. The other coauthors had no disclosures to report.

Flashback to 2013 and the attempt to repeal the SGR formula

Article Type
Changed

 

This month, our “Flashback” article highlights Congress’s long-term attempt to repeal the Sustainable Growth Rate formula for physician reimbursement and base our payments on patient health outcomes. Although the Medicare Access and Quality Improvement Act of 2013 (highlighted in our 2013 article) sponsored by Rep. Michael Burgess and passed unanimously in the House of Representatives did not become law, it did set the stage for the passage of H.R.2 – the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA). Also sponsored by Rep. Burgess and passed with bipartisan support, MACRA has now become the foundation for our transition from fee-for-service reimbursement to value-based care.

In just 2 short years, we have all become familiar with terms like MIPS (Merit-based Incentive Payment System) and APMs (Alternative Payment Models). These two methods of reimbursement will become the backbone of a growing percentage of our revenue going forward. Gastroenterologists should embrace these programs and work to find our unique position in the health care value chain.

A less well-known component of the MACRA, the Physician Focused Payment Model (PFPM), allows physicians to develop unique value-based payment models that can then be deployed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) as APMs. Project Sonar, an intensive medical home for patients with inflammatory bowel disease, was recently approved as the first PFPM, which may represent an opportunity for gastroenterologists to participate in APMs in 2018.

Do not reject the transition to value. Medicine is no different from most other industries in which value for the consumer is the major driver of business model change. Although physicians pride themselves on practicing quality medicine, quality cannot be our only focus. The cost of the services we provide must also be considered. Together, higher quality and lower cost drive value.

Our focus on cost should not only be directed at the specific services we ourselves provide, but should also be aimed at the total cost of care for the population of patients we are serving. We must be able to demonstrate to those who are taking the risk for payment that the real value of our services lies in improving the health and lowering the overall cost of care for a population of patients.

Larry R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF, FACG, is a managing partner of Illinois Gastroenterology Group, the Clinical Private Practice Councillor for the AGA, and serves on its Governing Board. He is president and chief medical officer of Project Sonar and an Associate Editor of GI & Hepatology News.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

This month, our “Flashback” article highlights Congress’s long-term attempt to repeal the Sustainable Growth Rate formula for physician reimbursement and base our payments on patient health outcomes. Although the Medicare Access and Quality Improvement Act of 2013 (highlighted in our 2013 article) sponsored by Rep. Michael Burgess and passed unanimously in the House of Representatives did not become law, it did set the stage for the passage of H.R.2 – the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA). Also sponsored by Rep. Burgess and passed with bipartisan support, MACRA has now become the foundation for our transition from fee-for-service reimbursement to value-based care.

In just 2 short years, we have all become familiar with terms like MIPS (Merit-based Incentive Payment System) and APMs (Alternative Payment Models). These two methods of reimbursement will become the backbone of a growing percentage of our revenue going forward. Gastroenterologists should embrace these programs and work to find our unique position in the health care value chain.

A less well-known component of the MACRA, the Physician Focused Payment Model (PFPM), allows physicians to develop unique value-based payment models that can then be deployed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) as APMs. Project Sonar, an intensive medical home for patients with inflammatory bowel disease, was recently approved as the first PFPM, which may represent an opportunity for gastroenterologists to participate in APMs in 2018.

Do not reject the transition to value. Medicine is no different from most other industries in which value for the consumer is the major driver of business model change. Although physicians pride themselves on practicing quality medicine, quality cannot be our only focus. The cost of the services we provide must also be considered. Together, higher quality and lower cost drive value.

Our focus on cost should not only be directed at the specific services we ourselves provide, but should also be aimed at the total cost of care for the population of patients we are serving. We must be able to demonstrate to those who are taking the risk for payment that the real value of our services lies in improving the health and lowering the overall cost of care for a population of patients.

Larry R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF, FACG, is a managing partner of Illinois Gastroenterology Group, the Clinical Private Practice Councillor for the AGA, and serves on its Governing Board. He is president and chief medical officer of Project Sonar and an Associate Editor of GI & Hepatology News.

 

This month, our “Flashback” article highlights Congress’s long-term attempt to repeal the Sustainable Growth Rate formula for physician reimbursement and base our payments on patient health outcomes. Although the Medicare Access and Quality Improvement Act of 2013 (highlighted in our 2013 article) sponsored by Rep. Michael Burgess and passed unanimously in the House of Representatives did not become law, it did set the stage for the passage of H.R.2 – the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA). Also sponsored by Rep. Burgess and passed with bipartisan support, MACRA has now become the foundation for our transition from fee-for-service reimbursement to value-based care.

In just 2 short years, we have all become familiar with terms like MIPS (Merit-based Incentive Payment System) and APMs (Alternative Payment Models). These two methods of reimbursement will become the backbone of a growing percentage of our revenue going forward. Gastroenterologists should embrace these programs and work to find our unique position in the health care value chain.

A less well-known component of the MACRA, the Physician Focused Payment Model (PFPM), allows physicians to develop unique value-based payment models that can then be deployed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) as APMs. Project Sonar, an intensive medical home for patients with inflammatory bowel disease, was recently approved as the first PFPM, which may represent an opportunity for gastroenterologists to participate in APMs in 2018.

Do not reject the transition to value. Medicine is no different from most other industries in which value for the consumer is the major driver of business model change. Although physicians pride themselves on practicing quality medicine, quality cannot be our only focus. The cost of the services we provide must also be considered. Together, higher quality and lower cost drive value.

Our focus on cost should not only be directed at the specific services we ourselves provide, but should also be aimed at the total cost of care for the population of patients we are serving. We must be able to demonstrate to those who are taking the risk for payment that the real value of our services lies in improving the health and lowering the overall cost of care for a population of patients.

Larry R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF, FACG, is a managing partner of Illinois Gastroenterology Group, the Clinical Private Practice Councillor for the AGA, and serves on its Governing Board. He is president and chief medical officer of Project Sonar and an Associate Editor of GI & Hepatology News.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

DURATION-8: Exenatide/dapagliflozin efficacy holds up at 1 year

Article Type
Changed

 

– A year of treatment with once-weekly exenatide and once-daily dapagliflozin significantly outperformed either therapy alone for patients whose type 2 diabetes was uncontrolled on metformin, investigators reported at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– A year of treatment with once-weekly exenatide and once-daily dapagliflozin significantly outperformed either therapy alone for patients whose type 2 diabetes was uncontrolled on metformin, investigators reported at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association.

 

– A year of treatment with once-weekly exenatide and once-daily dapagliflozin significantly outperformed either therapy alone for patients whose type 2 diabetes was uncontrolled on metformin, investigators reported at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT THE ADA ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Exenatide/dapagliflozin therapy was more effective than either drug alone in type 2 diabetes that was uncontrolled with metformin.

Major finding: At week 52, dual therapy significantly outperformed exenatide alone in terms of hemoglobin A1c, fasting and 2-hour postprandial glucose, body weight, and systolic blood pressure. Dual therapy also significantly topped dapagliflozin alone on glycemic measures.

Data source: DURATION-8, a double-blind, randomized, active-controlled phase III trial of 695 patients with type 2 diabetes.

Disclosures: AstraZeneca markets Byetta and Farxiga and sponsored the trial. Dr. Guja reported having been on a speakers bureau for AstraZeneca and disclosed ties to several other pharmaceutical companies.