Map helps predict new cancer genes

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Map helps predict new cancer genes

Frederick Roth, PhD

Credit: Mount Sinai Hospital

Researchers say they’ve created the largest-scale map of direct interactions between proteins encoded by the human genome, and this has revealed dozens of genes that may be involved in cancers.

This human interactome map describes about 14,000 direct interactions between proteins.

The map is about 30% larger than previous maps and contains more high-quality interactions than have come from all previous studies combined, according to the researchers.

Frederick Roth, PhD, of the University of Toronto and Mount Sinai Hospital in Ontario, Canada, and his colleagues described their map in Cell.

First, the researchers identified protein interactions via lab experiments. Then, they used computer modelling to zoom in on proteins that connect to one or more other cancer proteins.

“We show, really for the first time, that cancer proteins are more likely to interconnect with one another than they are to connect to randomly chosen non-cancer proteins,” Dr Roth said.

“Once you see that proteins associated to the same disease are more likely to connect to each other, now you can use this network of interactions as a prediction tool to find new cancer proteins and the genes they encode.”

For example, two known cancer genes encoded two proteins that interacted with CTBP2, a protein encoded at a location tied to prostate cancer, which can spread to nearby lymph nodes. These two proteins are implicated in lymphoid tumors, suggesting that CTBP2 plays a role in the development of lymphoid tumors.

Using their predictive method, the researchers found that 60 of their predicted cancer genes fit into a known cancer pathway.

The study also revealed that the network of protein interactions in humans covers a much broader range of genes than some past research has suggested.

Dr Roth said studies often focus on “popular” proteins that have already been linked to disease or are interesting for other reasons, and this has created a bias in our understanding of protein interactions.

“One major conclusion of the paper is that when you look systematically for interactions, you find them everywhere,” he said.

He and his colleagues believe that knowledge of protein interactions is likely to inform worldwide efforts to sequence and interpret cancer genomes.

Publications
Topics

Frederick Roth, PhD

Credit: Mount Sinai Hospital

Researchers say they’ve created the largest-scale map of direct interactions between proteins encoded by the human genome, and this has revealed dozens of genes that may be involved in cancers.

This human interactome map describes about 14,000 direct interactions between proteins.

The map is about 30% larger than previous maps and contains more high-quality interactions than have come from all previous studies combined, according to the researchers.

Frederick Roth, PhD, of the University of Toronto and Mount Sinai Hospital in Ontario, Canada, and his colleagues described their map in Cell.

First, the researchers identified protein interactions via lab experiments. Then, they used computer modelling to zoom in on proteins that connect to one or more other cancer proteins.

“We show, really for the first time, that cancer proteins are more likely to interconnect with one another than they are to connect to randomly chosen non-cancer proteins,” Dr Roth said.

“Once you see that proteins associated to the same disease are more likely to connect to each other, now you can use this network of interactions as a prediction tool to find new cancer proteins and the genes they encode.”

For example, two known cancer genes encoded two proteins that interacted with CTBP2, a protein encoded at a location tied to prostate cancer, which can spread to nearby lymph nodes. These two proteins are implicated in lymphoid tumors, suggesting that CTBP2 plays a role in the development of lymphoid tumors.

Using their predictive method, the researchers found that 60 of their predicted cancer genes fit into a known cancer pathway.

The study also revealed that the network of protein interactions in humans covers a much broader range of genes than some past research has suggested.

Dr Roth said studies often focus on “popular” proteins that have already been linked to disease or are interesting for other reasons, and this has created a bias in our understanding of protein interactions.

“One major conclusion of the paper is that when you look systematically for interactions, you find them everywhere,” he said.

He and his colleagues believe that knowledge of protein interactions is likely to inform worldwide efforts to sequence and interpret cancer genomes.

Frederick Roth, PhD

Credit: Mount Sinai Hospital

Researchers say they’ve created the largest-scale map of direct interactions between proteins encoded by the human genome, and this has revealed dozens of genes that may be involved in cancers.

This human interactome map describes about 14,000 direct interactions between proteins.

The map is about 30% larger than previous maps and contains more high-quality interactions than have come from all previous studies combined, according to the researchers.

Frederick Roth, PhD, of the University of Toronto and Mount Sinai Hospital in Ontario, Canada, and his colleagues described their map in Cell.

First, the researchers identified protein interactions via lab experiments. Then, they used computer modelling to zoom in on proteins that connect to one or more other cancer proteins.

“We show, really for the first time, that cancer proteins are more likely to interconnect with one another than they are to connect to randomly chosen non-cancer proteins,” Dr Roth said.

“Once you see that proteins associated to the same disease are more likely to connect to each other, now you can use this network of interactions as a prediction tool to find new cancer proteins and the genes they encode.”

For example, two known cancer genes encoded two proteins that interacted with CTBP2, a protein encoded at a location tied to prostate cancer, which can spread to nearby lymph nodes. These two proteins are implicated in lymphoid tumors, suggesting that CTBP2 plays a role in the development of lymphoid tumors.

Using their predictive method, the researchers found that 60 of their predicted cancer genes fit into a known cancer pathway.

The study also revealed that the network of protein interactions in humans covers a much broader range of genes than some past research has suggested.

Dr Roth said studies often focus on “popular” proteins that have already been linked to disease or are interesting for other reasons, and this has created a bias in our understanding of protein interactions.

“One major conclusion of the paper is that when you look systematically for interactions, you find them everywhere,” he said.

He and his colleagues believe that knowledge of protein interactions is likely to inform worldwide efforts to sequence and interpret cancer genomes.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Map helps predict new cancer genes
Display Headline
Map helps predict new cancer genes
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

At what endometrial thickness should biopsy be performed in postmenopausal women without vaginal bleeding?

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
At what endometrial thickness should biopsy be performed in postmenopausal women without vaginal bleeding?

With no consensus regarding the normal endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women without vaginal bleeding, there are no guidelines for clinicians to follow on when to biopsy, if at all, in an older patient presenting with pelvic pain but no bleeding.

To determine at what endometrial thickness biopsy would be optimal, Michelle Louie, MD, and colleagues from Magee Women’s Hospital in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, performed a retrospective cohort analysis of postmenopausal women aged 50 or older who underwent transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) for indications other than vaginal bleeding. They presented their findings in an abstract at the 43rd AAGL Global Congress in Vancouver, Canada.

Details of the study

Patients were included if they had an endometrial lining of 4 mm or greater and excluded if they had a history of tamoxifen use, hormone replacement, endometrial ablation, hereditary cancer syndrome, or no available pathology results.

Of 462 biopsies, 435 (94.2%) had benign pathology, nine (2.0%) had carcinoma, and seven (1.5%) had atypical hyperplasia.

Endometrial thickness of 14 mm or greater was associated with atypical hyperplasia (odds ratio [OR], 4.29; P = .02), with a negative predictive value of 98.3%. A thickness of 15 mm or greater was associated with carcinoma (OR, 4.53; P = .03), with a negative predictive value of 98.5%.

Under 14 mm, the risk of hyperplasia was low, the authors found, at 0.08%. Below 15 mm, the risk of cancer was 0.06%.

They found no significant associations between endometrial lining TVUS appearance, age, parity, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and carcinoma or atypical hyperplasia.

When biopsy might not be necessary

Therefore, regardless of conventional risk factors for endometrial cancer, if a postmenopausal woman reports pelvic pain without vaginal bleeding, and is found to have a thickened endometrial lining of less than 14 mm on TVUS, biopsy might not be warranted, conclude the study authors.  

References

Reference

Louie M, Canavan T, Mansuria S. Threshold for endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal patients without vaginal bleeding. Abstract presented at: 43rd AAGL Global Congress; November 2014; Vancouver, Canada.

Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
OBG Management - 26(11)
Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
Michelle Louie MD, Magee, AAGL, endometrial cancer, endometrial thickness, endometrial biopsy, postmenopausal
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Related Articles

With no consensus regarding the normal endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women without vaginal bleeding, there are no guidelines for clinicians to follow on when to biopsy, if at all, in an older patient presenting with pelvic pain but no bleeding.

To determine at what endometrial thickness biopsy would be optimal, Michelle Louie, MD, and colleagues from Magee Women’s Hospital in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, performed a retrospective cohort analysis of postmenopausal women aged 50 or older who underwent transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) for indications other than vaginal bleeding. They presented their findings in an abstract at the 43rd AAGL Global Congress in Vancouver, Canada.

Details of the study

Patients were included if they had an endometrial lining of 4 mm or greater and excluded if they had a history of tamoxifen use, hormone replacement, endometrial ablation, hereditary cancer syndrome, or no available pathology results.

Of 462 biopsies, 435 (94.2%) had benign pathology, nine (2.0%) had carcinoma, and seven (1.5%) had atypical hyperplasia.

Endometrial thickness of 14 mm or greater was associated with atypical hyperplasia (odds ratio [OR], 4.29; P = .02), with a negative predictive value of 98.3%. A thickness of 15 mm or greater was associated with carcinoma (OR, 4.53; P = .03), with a negative predictive value of 98.5%.

Under 14 mm, the risk of hyperplasia was low, the authors found, at 0.08%. Below 15 mm, the risk of cancer was 0.06%.

They found no significant associations between endometrial lining TVUS appearance, age, parity, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and carcinoma or atypical hyperplasia.

When biopsy might not be necessary

Therefore, regardless of conventional risk factors for endometrial cancer, if a postmenopausal woman reports pelvic pain without vaginal bleeding, and is found to have a thickened endometrial lining of less than 14 mm on TVUS, biopsy might not be warranted, conclude the study authors.  

With no consensus regarding the normal endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women without vaginal bleeding, there are no guidelines for clinicians to follow on when to biopsy, if at all, in an older patient presenting with pelvic pain but no bleeding.

To determine at what endometrial thickness biopsy would be optimal, Michelle Louie, MD, and colleagues from Magee Women’s Hospital in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, performed a retrospective cohort analysis of postmenopausal women aged 50 or older who underwent transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) for indications other than vaginal bleeding. They presented their findings in an abstract at the 43rd AAGL Global Congress in Vancouver, Canada.

Details of the study

Patients were included if they had an endometrial lining of 4 mm or greater and excluded if they had a history of tamoxifen use, hormone replacement, endometrial ablation, hereditary cancer syndrome, or no available pathology results.

Of 462 biopsies, 435 (94.2%) had benign pathology, nine (2.0%) had carcinoma, and seven (1.5%) had atypical hyperplasia.

Endometrial thickness of 14 mm or greater was associated with atypical hyperplasia (odds ratio [OR], 4.29; P = .02), with a negative predictive value of 98.3%. A thickness of 15 mm or greater was associated with carcinoma (OR, 4.53; P = .03), with a negative predictive value of 98.5%.

Under 14 mm, the risk of hyperplasia was low, the authors found, at 0.08%. Below 15 mm, the risk of cancer was 0.06%.

They found no significant associations between endometrial lining TVUS appearance, age, parity, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and carcinoma or atypical hyperplasia.

When biopsy might not be necessary

Therefore, regardless of conventional risk factors for endometrial cancer, if a postmenopausal woman reports pelvic pain without vaginal bleeding, and is found to have a thickened endometrial lining of less than 14 mm on TVUS, biopsy might not be warranted, conclude the study authors.  

References

Reference

Louie M, Canavan T, Mansuria S. Threshold for endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal patients without vaginal bleeding. Abstract presented at: 43rd AAGL Global Congress; November 2014; Vancouver, Canada.

References

Reference

Louie M, Canavan T, Mansuria S. Threshold for endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal patients without vaginal bleeding. Abstract presented at: 43rd AAGL Global Congress; November 2014; Vancouver, Canada.

Issue
OBG Management - 26(11)
Issue
OBG Management - 26(11)
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
At what endometrial thickness should biopsy be performed in postmenopausal women without vaginal bleeding?
Display Headline
At what endometrial thickness should biopsy be performed in postmenopausal women without vaginal bleeding?
Legacy Keywords
Michelle Louie MD, Magee, AAGL, endometrial cancer, endometrial thickness, endometrial biopsy, postmenopausal
Legacy Keywords
Michelle Louie MD, Magee, AAGL, endometrial cancer, endometrial thickness, endometrial biopsy, postmenopausal
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

FDA OKs use of system to treat Ebola convalescent plasma

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
FDA OKs use of system to treat Ebola convalescent plasma

Plasma for transfusion

Credit: Cristina Granados

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted a clinical protocol to make the INTERCEPT Blood System available to treat plasma collected from Ebola survivors.

Transfusion of blood or plasma from recovered Ebola patients can be of benefit in patients with acute Ebola infections, but recovered patients may carry undetected pathogens such as malaria, which is where the INTERCEPT Blood System for plasma comes in.

The system is used for the preparation and storage of whole blood-derived and apheresis plasma (fresh or recently thawed). It can inactivate a range of viruses, bacteria, and parasites to reduce the risk of transmission via transfusion.

“The INTERCEPT pathogen inactivation process can diminish the risk of other pathogens that may contaminate the plasma of valuable Ebola convalescent donors and will provide a new therapeutic resource for patients with Ebola,” said Laurence Corash, MD, senior vice president and chief medical officer of Cerus Corporation, the company developing the INTERCEPT system.

The INTERCEPT Blood System for plasma does not have FDA approval. The agency has approved use of the system via an investigational device exemption (IDE). This allows for early access to a device not yet approved in the US when no satisfactory alternative is available to treat patients with serious or life-threatening conditions.

Under this IDE, investigators at Emory University will collect Ebola convalescent plasma from recovered patients and use the INTERCEPT system for onsite pathogen inactivation.

Following testing for Ebola antibodies at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the treated plasma will be stored at Emory for use with future patients. If needed, Emory will also supply the treated plasma for use at other Ebola treatment centers, such as the University of Nebraska Medical Center.

To further increase the availability of convalescent plasma, Cerus and the trial investigators are collaborating with the American Red Cross and America’s Blood Centers to create a national network of plasma collection sites to access recovered Ebola patients.

“Having a supply of convalescent plasma that has been through pathogen inactivation is critical to making this therapy readily available as new Ebola patients are diagnosed and urgently require treatment,” said Anne Winkler, MD, principal investigator for the study and an assistant professor at the Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia.

The World Health Organization recently identified convalescent plasma as a potentially promising experimental approach to treat Ebola, issuing interim guidance suggesting how the plasma should be sourced and supplied.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation recently announced a $5.7 million commitment to support efforts in Guinea and other Ebola-affected countries to scale up the production and evaluation of potential therapies for people infected with the Ebola virus, including convalescent plasma treated with pathogen inactivation.

Funding is being provided to Clinical Research Management, Inc., and an array of private sector partners to study Ebola convalescent plasma that will be collected through mobile donation units fully equipped with apheresis plasma collection systems and the INTERCEPT Blood System for plasma.

The INTERCEPT platelet and plasma systems have been approved for use in Europe for 8 years and are used in 20 countries. License applications for the systems are under FDA review, with an approval decision expected in 2015.

The FDA recently accepted Cerus’s clinical protocol to make the INTERCEPT Blood System for platelets available under an IDE to regions in the US and its territories with outbreaks of Chikungunya and dengue virus.

Publications
Topics

Plasma for transfusion

Credit: Cristina Granados

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted a clinical protocol to make the INTERCEPT Blood System available to treat plasma collected from Ebola survivors.

Transfusion of blood or plasma from recovered Ebola patients can be of benefit in patients with acute Ebola infections, but recovered patients may carry undetected pathogens such as malaria, which is where the INTERCEPT Blood System for plasma comes in.

The system is used for the preparation and storage of whole blood-derived and apheresis plasma (fresh or recently thawed). It can inactivate a range of viruses, bacteria, and parasites to reduce the risk of transmission via transfusion.

“The INTERCEPT pathogen inactivation process can diminish the risk of other pathogens that may contaminate the plasma of valuable Ebola convalescent donors and will provide a new therapeutic resource for patients with Ebola,” said Laurence Corash, MD, senior vice president and chief medical officer of Cerus Corporation, the company developing the INTERCEPT system.

The INTERCEPT Blood System for plasma does not have FDA approval. The agency has approved use of the system via an investigational device exemption (IDE). This allows for early access to a device not yet approved in the US when no satisfactory alternative is available to treat patients with serious or life-threatening conditions.

Under this IDE, investigators at Emory University will collect Ebola convalescent plasma from recovered patients and use the INTERCEPT system for onsite pathogen inactivation.

Following testing for Ebola antibodies at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the treated plasma will be stored at Emory for use with future patients. If needed, Emory will also supply the treated plasma for use at other Ebola treatment centers, such as the University of Nebraska Medical Center.

To further increase the availability of convalescent plasma, Cerus and the trial investigators are collaborating with the American Red Cross and America’s Blood Centers to create a national network of plasma collection sites to access recovered Ebola patients.

“Having a supply of convalescent plasma that has been through pathogen inactivation is critical to making this therapy readily available as new Ebola patients are diagnosed and urgently require treatment,” said Anne Winkler, MD, principal investigator for the study and an assistant professor at the Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia.

The World Health Organization recently identified convalescent plasma as a potentially promising experimental approach to treat Ebola, issuing interim guidance suggesting how the plasma should be sourced and supplied.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation recently announced a $5.7 million commitment to support efforts in Guinea and other Ebola-affected countries to scale up the production and evaluation of potential therapies for people infected with the Ebola virus, including convalescent plasma treated with pathogen inactivation.

Funding is being provided to Clinical Research Management, Inc., and an array of private sector partners to study Ebola convalescent plasma that will be collected through mobile donation units fully equipped with apheresis plasma collection systems and the INTERCEPT Blood System for plasma.

The INTERCEPT platelet and plasma systems have been approved for use in Europe for 8 years and are used in 20 countries. License applications for the systems are under FDA review, with an approval decision expected in 2015.

The FDA recently accepted Cerus’s clinical protocol to make the INTERCEPT Blood System for platelets available under an IDE to regions in the US and its territories with outbreaks of Chikungunya and dengue virus.

Plasma for transfusion

Credit: Cristina Granados

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted a clinical protocol to make the INTERCEPT Blood System available to treat plasma collected from Ebola survivors.

Transfusion of blood or plasma from recovered Ebola patients can be of benefit in patients with acute Ebola infections, but recovered patients may carry undetected pathogens such as malaria, which is where the INTERCEPT Blood System for plasma comes in.

The system is used for the preparation and storage of whole blood-derived and apheresis plasma (fresh or recently thawed). It can inactivate a range of viruses, bacteria, and parasites to reduce the risk of transmission via transfusion.

“The INTERCEPT pathogen inactivation process can diminish the risk of other pathogens that may contaminate the plasma of valuable Ebola convalescent donors and will provide a new therapeutic resource for patients with Ebola,” said Laurence Corash, MD, senior vice president and chief medical officer of Cerus Corporation, the company developing the INTERCEPT system.

The INTERCEPT Blood System for plasma does not have FDA approval. The agency has approved use of the system via an investigational device exemption (IDE). This allows for early access to a device not yet approved in the US when no satisfactory alternative is available to treat patients with serious or life-threatening conditions.

Under this IDE, investigators at Emory University will collect Ebola convalescent plasma from recovered patients and use the INTERCEPT system for onsite pathogen inactivation.

Following testing for Ebola antibodies at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the treated plasma will be stored at Emory for use with future patients. If needed, Emory will also supply the treated plasma for use at other Ebola treatment centers, such as the University of Nebraska Medical Center.

To further increase the availability of convalescent plasma, Cerus and the trial investigators are collaborating with the American Red Cross and America’s Blood Centers to create a national network of plasma collection sites to access recovered Ebola patients.

“Having a supply of convalescent plasma that has been through pathogen inactivation is critical to making this therapy readily available as new Ebola patients are diagnosed and urgently require treatment,” said Anne Winkler, MD, principal investigator for the study and an assistant professor at the Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia.

The World Health Organization recently identified convalescent plasma as a potentially promising experimental approach to treat Ebola, issuing interim guidance suggesting how the plasma should be sourced and supplied.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation recently announced a $5.7 million commitment to support efforts in Guinea and other Ebola-affected countries to scale up the production and evaluation of potential therapies for people infected with the Ebola virus, including convalescent plasma treated with pathogen inactivation.

Funding is being provided to Clinical Research Management, Inc., and an array of private sector partners to study Ebola convalescent plasma that will be collected through mobile donation units fully equipped with apheresis plasma collection systems and the INTERCEPT Blood System for plasma.

The INTERCEPT platelet and plasma systems have been approved for use in Europe for 8 years and are used in 20 countries. License applications for the systems are under FDA review, with an approval decision expected in 2015.

The FDA recently accepted Cerus’s clinical protocol to make the INTERCEPT Blood System for platelets available under an IDE to regions in the US and its territories with outbreaks of Chikungunya and dengue virus.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
FDA OKs use of system to treat Ebola convalescent plasma
Display Headline
FDA OKs use of system to treat Ebola convalescent plasma
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Compounds can target Ras pathway

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Compounds can target Ras pathway

Researcher in the lab

Credit: NIH

A newly identified class of compounds recognize a key target in the Ras signaling pathway and could therefore prove useful in treating a range of malignancies, according to research published in Chemistry & Biology.

The lead compound, NSC-658497, targeted the catalytic activation of Ras by an enzyme called SOS1.

NSC-658497 blocked SOS1-mediated molecular signaling in the Ras pathway that causes rapid cell proliferation, tumor development, and cancer.

“While Ras pathway activation is a dominant event happening in many diseases, so far, the immediate signaling module of the Ras pathway has been difficult to target,” said study author Yi Zheng, PhD, of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital in Ohio.

“Most strategies for treatment have been geared toward hitting molecular effectors that are farther downstream. In this study, we have identified synthetic compounds that specifically recognize the catalytic pocket of SOS1 and demonstrated that they are effective inhibitors of Ras signaling in cells. This establishes a novel targeting approach for cancers and Rasopathies that is useful in developing therapeutics.”

Rasopathies include a group of 9 developmental syndromes that are caused by mutations in the Ras pathway (Noonan, LEOPARD, hereditary Gingival fibromatosis type 1, Capillary malformation-AV malformation, Neurofibromatosis type 1, Legius, Costello, Cardio-facio-cutaneous, and autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndromes).

Dysregulation of the Ras pathway (including its SOS1 catalytic activator) is also linked to a number of malignancies, such as breast, pancreatic, and cervical cancers, as well as leukemia.

To find compounds that could target the Ras pathway, Dr Zheng and his colleagues tested 30,000 synthetic molecular compounds in a database maintained by the National Cancer Institute.

The researchers looked for the compounds’ ability to dock with the catalytic site of SOS1, which led them to identify NSC-658497 and derivatives as lead candidates for the development of a prospective drug.

The team then tested NSC-658497 in cell lines of mouse fibroblasts and prostate cancer. These experiments showed the compound successfully blocked SOS1-to-Ras signaling and the proliferation of cancer cells.

Dr Zheng said one of the researchers’ next steps is to transform NSC-658497 into a drug that can be administered to a living organism so the team can begin testing the inhibitor in mouse models of different Rasopathies and cancers.

One of the targeted approaches the researchers plan to explore is whether NSC-658497 might be most promising in individuals who have a subset of disease in which SOS1 is significantly overexpressed or mutated.

Publications
Topics

Researcher in the lab

Credit: NIH

A newly identified class of compounds recognize a key target in the Ras signaling pathway and could therefore prove useful in treating a range of malignancies, according to research published in Chemistry & Biology.

The lead compound, NSC-658497, targeted the catalytic activation of Ras by an enzyme called SOS1.

NSC-658497 blocked SOS1-mediated molecular signaling in the Ras pathway that causes rapid cell proliferation, tumor development, and cancer.

“While Ras pathway activation is a dominant event happening in many diseases, so far, the immediate signaling module of the Ras pathway has been difficult to target,” said study author Yi Zheng, PhD, of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital in Ohio.

“Most strategies for treatment have been geared toward hitting molecular effectors that are farther downstream. In this study, we have identified synthetic compounds that specifically recognize the catalytic pocket of SOS1 and demonstrated that they are effective inhibitors of Ras signaling in cells. This establishes a novel targeting approach for cancers and Rasopathies that is useful in developing therapeutics.”

Rasopathies include a group of 9 developmental syndromes that are caused by mutations in the Ras pathway (Noonan, LEOPARD, hereditary Gingival fibromatosis type 1, Capillary malformation-AV malformation, Neurofibromatosis type 1, Legius, Costello, Cardio-facio-cutaneous, and autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndromes).

Dysregulation of the Ras pathway (including its SOS1 catalytic activator) is also linked to a number of malignancies, such as breast, pancreatic, and cervical cancers, as well as leukemia.

To find compounds that could target the Ras pathway, Dr Zheng and his colleagues tested 30,000 synthetic molecular compounds in a database maintained by the National Cancer Institute.

The researchers looked for the compounds’ ability to dock with the catalytic site of SOS1, which led them to identify NSC-658497 and derivatives as lead candidates for the development of a prospective drug.

The team then tested NSC-658497 in cell lines of mouse fibroblasts and prostate cancer. These experiments showed the compound successfully blocked SOS1-to-Ras signaling and the proliferation of cancer cells.

Dr Zheng said one of the researchers’ next steps is to transform NSC-658497 into a drug that can be administered to a living organism so the team can begin testing the inhibitor in mouse models of different Rasopathies and cancers.

One of the targeted approaches the researchers plan to explore is whether NSC-658497 might be most promising in individuals who have a subset of disease in which SOS1 is significantly overexpressed or mutated.

Researcher in the lab

Credit: NIH

A newly identified class of compounds recognize a key target in the Ras signaling pathway and could therefore prove useful in treating a range of malignancies, according to research published in Chemistry & Biology.

The lead compound, NSC-658497, targeted the catalytic activation of Ras by an enzyme called SOS1.

NSC-658497 blocked SOS1-mediated molecular signaling in the Ras pathway that causes rapid cell proliferation, tumor development, and cancer.

“While Ras pathway activation is a dominant event happening in many diseases, so far, the immediate signaling module of the Ras pathway has been difficult to target,” said study author Yi Zheng, PhD, of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital in Ohio.

“Most strategies for treatment have been geared toward hitting molecular effectors that are farther downstream. In this study, we have identified synthetic compounds that specifically recognize the catalytic pocket of SOS1 and demonstrated that they are effective inhibitors of Ras signaling in cells. This establishes a novel targeting approach for cancers and Rasopathies that is useful in developing therapeutics.”

Rasopathies include a group of 9 developmental syndromes that are caused by mutations in the Ras pathway (Noonan, LEOPARD, hereditary Gingival fibromatosis type 1, Capillary malformation-AV malformation, Neurofibromatosis type 1, Legius, Costello, Cardio-facio-cutaneous, and autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndromes).

Dysregulation of the Ras pathway (including its SOS1 catalytic activator) is also linked to a number of malignancies, such as breast, pancreatic, and cervical cancers, as well as leukemia.

To find compounds that could target the Ras pathway, Dr Zheng and his colleagues tested 30,000 synthetic molecular compounds in a database maintained by the National Cancer Institute.

The researchers looked for the compounds’ ability to dock with the catalytic site of SOS1, which led them to identify NSC-658497 and derivatives as lead candidates for the development of a prospective drug.

The team then tested NSC-658497 in cell lines of mouse fibroblasts and prostate cancer. These experiments showed the compound successfully blocked SOS1-to-Ras signaling and the proliferation of cancer cells.

Dr Zheng said one of the researchers’ next steps is to transform NSC-658497 into a drug that can be administered to a living organism so the team can begin testing the inhibitor in mouse models of different Rasopathies and cancers.

One of the targeted approaches the researchers plan to explore is whether NSC-658497 might be most promising in individuals who have a subset of disease in which SOS1 is significantly overexpressed or mutated.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Compounds can target Ras pathway
Display Headline
Compounds can target Ras pathway
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Preferences

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Patient preferences regarding pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

The 2012 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy conducted a systematic review focusing on patient values and preferences regarding antithrombotic therapy, including thromboprophylaxis.[1] They found that patient values and preferences are highly variable and should be considered when developing future clinical practice guidelines. Notably, there were no studies evaluating patient preferences for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, which is prescribed for the vast majority of hospitalized patients.

Historically, interventions to prevent VTE have focused on increasing prescriptions of prophylaxis. At the Johns Hopkins Hospital, we implemented a mandatory clinical decision support tool in our computerized provider order entry system.[2] Following implementation of this tool, prescription of risk‐appropriate VTE prophylaxis dramatically increased for both medical and surgical patients.[3, 4, 5] These efforts were made with the implicit and incorrect assumption that prescribed medication doses will always be administered to patients, when in fact patient refusal is a leading cause of nonadministration. Studies of VTE prophylaxis administration have reported that 10% to 12% of doses are not administered to patients.[6] Alarmingly, it has been reported that among medically ill patients, between 10% and 30% of doses are not administered, with patient refusal as the most frequently documented reason.

The purpose of this study was to assess patient preferences regarding pharmacological VTE prophylaxis.

METHODS

Study Design

A sample of consecutive hospitalized patients on select medicine and surgical floors previously identified as low‐ and high‐performing units at our institution in regard to administration rates of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was assembled from a daily electronic report of patients prescribed pharmacological VTE prophylaxis (Allscripts Sunrise, Chicago, IL) from December 2012 to March 2013. These units were identified in a study conducted at our institution as the lowest‐ and highest‐performing units in regard to incidence of administration of ordered pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. From this data analysis, we chose the 2 lowest‐performing and 2 highest‐performing units on the medical and surgical service. To be eligible for this study, patients had to have an active order for 1 of the following VTE prophylaxis regimens: unfractionated heparin 5000 units or 7500 units administered subcutaneously every 8 or 12 hours, enoxaparin 30 mg administered subcutaneously every 12 hours or 40 mg administered subcutaneously every 24 hours. Participants had to be at least 18 years of age and hospitalized for at least 2 days on their respective units. Patients who were nonEnglish speaking, those previously enrolled in this study, or those unable to provide consent were excluded from the study.

Data Collection

Demographic information was collected, including patient‐reported education level. To determine their preference for VTE prophylaxis, patients were provided a survey, which included being asked, Would you prefer a pill or a shot to prevent blood clots, if they both worked equally well. The survey was created by the study team to collect information from patients regarding their baseline knowledge of VTE and preference regarding pharmacologic prophylaxis. Additional data included the patient's education level to determine potential association with preference. The survey was verbally administered by 1 investigator (A.W.) to all patients. Patients were asked to explain their rationale for their stated preference in regard to VTE prophylaxis. Patient rationale was subsequently coded to allow for uniformity among patient responses based on patterns in responses. Our electronic medication record allows us to identify patients who refused their medication through nursing documentation. Patients with documented refusal of ordered pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis were asked about the rationale for their refusal. This study was approved by the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board.

Statistical Analysis

Quantitative data from the surveys were analyzed using Minitab (Minitab Inc., State College, PA). A [2] test analysis was performed for categorical data, as appropriate. A P value 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Quantitative Results

We interviewed patients regarding their preferred route of administration of VTE prophylaxis. Overall, 339 patients were screened for this study. Sixty patients were not eligible to participate. Forty‐seven were unable to provide consent, and 13 were nonEnglish speaking. Of the 269 remaining eligible patients, 227 (84.4%) consented to participate.

Baseline demographics of the participants are presented in Table 1, categorized on the basis of their preferred route of administration for VTE prophylaxis. A majority of patients indicated a preference for an oral formulation of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. There was no association between education level or service type on preference. Preference for an oral formulation was largely influenced by patient‐reported pain and bruising associated with subcutaneous administration (Table 2). A substantial majority of patients reporting a preference for a subcutaneous formulation and emphasized a belief that this route was associated with a faster onset of action. Among patients who preferred an oral formulation (n=137), 71 patients (51.8%) were documented as having refused at least 1 dose of ordered VTE prophylaxis. Patients who preferred a subcutaneous route of VTE prophylaxis were less likely to refuse prophylaxis, with only 22 patients (35.5%) having a documented refusal of at least 1 dose (P0.0001).

Patient Demographics in Relation to Prophylaxis Preference
Enteral, n=137 Parenteral, n=62 No Preference, n=28
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

Age, y, mean ( SD) 49.5 (14.7) 51.7 (16.1) 48.9 (14.6)
Male, n (%) 74 (54.0) 38 (61.3) 15 (53.6)
Race n (%)
Caucasian 81 (59.1) 31 (50.0) 14 (50.0)
African American 50 (36.5) 28 (45.2) 14 (50.0)
Education level, n (%)
High school or less 46 (33.6) 27 (43.5) 14 (50.0)
College 68 (49.6) 21 (33.9) 9 (32.1)
Advanced degree 10 (7.3) 8 (12.9) 2 (7.1)
Unable to obtain 13 (9.5) 6 (9.7) 3 (10.8)
Past history of VTE, n (%) 12 (8.8) 9 (14.5) 2 (7.1)
Type of unit, n (%)
Medical 59 (43.1) 24 (38.7) 17 (60.7)
Surgical 78 (56.9) 38 (61.3) 11 (39.3)
Documented refusal of ordered prophylaxis, n (%) 71 (51.8) 20 (32.3) 9 (32.1)
Length of hospital stay prior to inclusion in study, d, median (IQR) 4.0 (3.07.0) 3.0 (3.05.0) 4.0 (2.05.0)
Patient Preferences and Rationale for Route of Administration for Pharmacological Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis
Patients preferring enteral route, n (%) 137 (60.4)
Dislike of needles 41 (30.0)
Pain from injection 38 (27.7)
Ease of use 18 (13.1)
Bruising from injection 9 (6.6)
Other/no rationale 31 (22.6)
Patients preferring injection route, n (%) 62 (27.5)
Faster onset of action 25 (40.3)
Pill burden 11 (17.7)
Ease of use 9 (14.5)
Other/no rationale 17 (27.5)
Patients with no preference, n (%) 28 (12.4)

DISCUSSION

Using a mixed‐methods approach, we report the first survey evaluating patient preferences regarding pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. We found that a majority of patients preferred an oral route of administration. Nevertheless, a substantial number of patients favored a subcutaneous route of administration believing it to be associated with a faster onset of action. Of interest, patients favoring subcutaneous injections were significantly less likely to refuse doses of ordered VTE prophylaxis. Given that all patients were prescribed a subcutaneous form of VTE prophylaxis, matching patient preference to VTE prophylaxis prescription could potentially increase adherence and reduce patient refusal of ordered prophylaxis. Considering the large number of patients who preferred an oral route of administration, the availability of an oral formulation may potentially result in improved adherence to inpatient VTE prophylaxis.

Our findings have significant implications for healthcare providers, and for patient safety and quality‐improvement researchers. VTE prophylaxis is an important patient‐safety practice, particularly for medically ill patients, which is believed to be underprescribed.[7] Recent studies have demonstrated that a significant number of doses of VTE prophylaxis are not administered, primarily due to patient refusal.[6] Our data indicate that tailoring the route of prophylaxis administration to patient preference may represent a feasible strategy to improve VTE prophylaxis administration rates. Recently, several target‐specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) have been approved for a variety of clinical indications, and all have been investigated for VTE prophylaxis.[7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15] However, no agent is currently US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved for primary prevention of VTE, although apixaban and rivaroxaban are FDA approved for VTE prevention in joint replacement.[13, 14] Although in some instances these TSOACs were noted to demonstrate only equivalent efficacy to standard subcutaneous forms of VTE prophylaxis, our data suggest that perhaps in some patients, use of these agents may result in better outcomes due to improved adherence to therapy due to a preferred oral route of administration. We think this hypothesis warrants further investigation.

Our study also underscores the importance of considering patient preferences when caring for patients as emphasized by the 2012 ACCP guidelines.[1] Our results indicate that consideration of patient preferences may lead to better patient care and better outcomes. Interestingly, there were no differences in preference based on education level or the type of service to which the patient was admitted. Clarification of uninformed opinions regarding the rationale for preference may also lead to more informed decisions by patients.

This study has a number of limitations. We only included patients on the internal medicine and general surgical services. It is possible that patients on other specialty services may have different opinions regarding prophylaxis that were not captured in our sample. Similarly, our sample size was limited, and approximately 15% of potential subjects did not participate. We do believe that our population is reflective of our institution based upon our previously published evaluation of multiple hospital units and the inclusion of low‐ and high‐performing units on both the medical and surgical services. Nevertheless, we believe that much more investigation of patient perspectives on VTE prophylaxis needs to be done to inform decision making, including the impact of patient preferences on VTE‐related outcomes. Additionally, we did not evaluate potential predictors of preference including admission diagnosis and duration of hospital length of stay.

In conclusion, we conducted a mixed‐methods analysis of patient preferences regarding pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. Matching patient preference to ordered VTE prophylaxis may increase adherence to ordered prophylaxis. In this era of increasingly patient‐centered healthcare and expanding options for VTE prophylaxis, we believe information on patient preferences will be helpful to tailoring options for prevention and treatment.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Disclosures: Dr. Haut is the primary investigator of the Mentored Clinician Scientist Development Award K08 1K08HS017952‐01 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality entitled Does Screening Variability Make DVT an Unreliable Quality Measure of Trauma Care? Dr. Haut receives royalties from Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins for a book he coauthored (Avoiding Common ICU Errors). He has received honoraria for various speaking engagements regarding clinical, quality, and safety topics and has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. Dr. Streiff has received research funding from Sanofi‐Aventis and Bristol‐Myers Squibb; honoraria for Continuing Medial Education lectures from Sanofi‐Aventis and Ortho‐McNeil; consulted for Sanofi‐Aventis, Eisai, Daiichi‐Sankyo, and Janssen HealthCare; and has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. Mr. Lau, Drs. Haut, Streiff, and Shermock are supported by a contract from the Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute titled Preventing Venous Thromboembolism: Empowering Patients and Enabling Patient‐Centered Care via Health Information Technology (CE‐12‐11‐4489). Ms. Hobson has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. All others have no relevant funding or conflicts of interest to report.

Files
References
  1. MacLean S, Mulla S, Akl EA, et al. Patient values and preferences in decision making for antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review. Chest. 2012;141(2):e1Se23S.
  2. Streiff MB, Carolan HT, Hobson DB, et al. Lessons from the Johns Hopkins Multi‐Disciplinary Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prevention Collaborative. BMJ. 2012;344:e3935.
  3. Zeidan AM, Streiff MB, Lau BD, et al. Impact of a venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis “smart order set”: improved compliance, fewer events. Am J Hematol. 2013;88(7):545549.
  4. Haut ER, Lau BD, Kraenzlin FS, et al. Improved prophylaxis and decreased preventable harm with a mandatory computerized clinical decision support tool for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in trauma patients. Arch Surg. 2012;147(10):901907.
  5. Aboagye JK, Lau BD, Schneider EB, Streiff MB, Haut ER. Linking processes and outcomes: a key strategy to prevent and report harm from venous thromboembolism in surgical patients. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(3):299300.
  6. Shermock KM, Lau BD, Haut ER, et al. Patterns of non‐administration of ordered doses of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: implications for intervention strategies. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66311.
  7. Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann J, et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross‐sectional study. Lancet. 2008;371:387394.
  8. Eriksson BI, Borris LC, Friedman LJ, et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:27652775.
  9. Lassen MR, Ageno W, Borris LC, et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthoplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:27762786.
  10. Lassen MR, Raskob GE, Gallus A, Pineo G, Chen D, Portman RJ. Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:594604.
  11. Lassen MR, Raskob GE, Gallus A, Pineo G, Chen D, Hornick P. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement (ADVANCE‐2): a randomized double‐blind trial. Lancet. 2010;275:807815.
  12. Turpie AG, Lassen MR, Eriksson BI, et al. Rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty. Pooled analysis of four studies. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105:444453.
  13. Goldhaber SZ, Leizorovicz A, Kakkar AK, et al. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:21672177.
  14. Beyer‐Westendorf J, Lützner J, Donath L, et al. Efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis with low‐molecular‐weight heparin or rivaroxaban in hip and knee replacement surgery: findings from the ORTHO‐TEP registry. Thromb Haemost. 2013;109:154163.
  15. Cohen AT, Spiro TE, Büller HR, et al. Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:513523.
Article PDF
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(2)
Page Number
108-111
Sections
Files
Files
Article PDF
Article PDF

The 2012 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy conducted a systematic review focusing on patient values and preferences regarding antithrombotic therapy, including thromboprophylaxis.[1] They found that patient values and preferences are highly variable and should be considered when developing future clinical practice guidelines. Notably, there were no studies evaluating patient preferences for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, which is prescribed for the vast majority of hospitalized patients.

Historically, interventions to prevent VTE have focused on increasing prescriptions of prophylaxis. At the Johns Hopkins Hospital, we implemented a mandatory clinical decision support tool in our computerized provider order entry system.[2] Following implementation of this tool, prescription of risk‐appropriate VTE prophylaxis dramatically increased for both medical and surgical patients.[3, 4, 5] These efforts were made with the implicit and incorrect assumption that prescribed medication doses will always be administered to patients, when in fact patient refusal is a leading cause of nonadministration. Studies of VTE prophylaxis administration have reported that 10% to 12% of doses are not administered to patients.[6] Alarmingly, it has been reported that among medically ill patients, between 10% and 30% of doses are not administered, with patient refusal as the most frequently documented reason.

The purpose of this study was to assess patient preferences regarding pharmacological VTE prophylaxis.

METHODS

Study Design

A sample of consecutive hospitalized patients on select medicine and surgical floors previously identified as low‐ and high‐performing units at our institution in regard to administration rates of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was assembled from a daily electronic report of patients prescribed pharmacological VTE prophylaxis (Allscripts Sunrise, Chicago, IL) from December 2012 to March 2013. These units were identified in a study conducted at our institution as the lowest‐ and highest‐performing units in regard to incidence of administration of ordered pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. From this data analysis, we chose the 2 lowest‐performing and 2 highest‐performing units on the medical and surgical service. To be eligible for this study, patients had to have an active order for 1 of the following VTE prophylaxis regimens: unfractionated heparin 5000 units or 7500 units administered subcutaneously every 8 or 12 hours, enoxaparin 30 mg administered subcutaneously every 12 hours or 40 mg administered subcutaneously every 24 hours. Participants had to be at least 18 years of age and hospitalized for at least 2 days on their respective units. Patients who were nonEnglish speaking, those previously enrolled in this study, or those unable to provide consent were excluded from the study.

Data Collection

Demographic information was collected, including patient‐reported education level. To determine their preference for VTE prophylaxis, patients were provided a survey, which included being asked, Would you prefer a pill or a shot to prevent blood clots, if they both worked equally well. The survey was created by the study team to collect information from patients regarding their baseline knowledge of VTE and preference regarding pharmacologic prophylaxis. Additional data included the patient's education level to determine potential association with preference. The survey was verbally administered by 1 investigator (A.W.) to all patients. Patients were asked to explain their rationale for their stated preference in regard to VTE prophylaxis. Patient rationale was subsequently coded to allow for uniformity among patient responses based on patterns in responses. Our electronic medication record allows us to identify patients who refused their medication through nursing documentation. Patients with documented refusal of ordered pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis were asked about the rationale for their refusal. This study was approved by the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board.

Statistical Analysis

Quantitative data from the surveys were analyzed using Minitab (Minitab Inc., State College, PA). A [2] test analysis was performed for categorical data, as appropriate. A P value 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Quantitative Results

We interviewed patients regarding their preferred route of administration of VTE prophylaxis. Overall, 339 patients were screened for this study. Sixty patients were not eligible to participate. Forty‐seven were unable to provide consent, and 13 were nonEnglish speaking. Of the 269 remaining eligible patients, 227 (84.4%) consented to participate.

Baseline demographics of the participants are presented in Table 1, categorized on the basis of their preferred route of administration for VTE prophylaxis. A majority of patients indicated a preference for an oral formulation of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. There was no association between education level or service type on preference. Preference for an oral formulation was largely influenced by patient‐reported pain and bruising associated with subcutaneous administration (Table 2). A substantial majority of patients reporting a preference for a subcutaneous formulation and emphasized a belief that this route was associated with a faster onset of action. Among patients who preferred an oral formulation (n=137), 71 patients (51.8%) were documented as having refused at least 1 dose of ordered VTE prophylaxis. Patients who preferred a subcutaneous route of VTE prophylaxis were less likely to refuse prophylaxis, with only 22 patients (35.5%) having a documented refusal of at least 1 dose (P0.0001).

Patient Demographics in Relation to Prophylaxis Preference
Enteral, n=137 Parenteral, n=62 No Preference, n=28
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

Age, y, mean ( SD) 49.5 (14.7) 51.7 (16.1) 48.9 (14.6)
Male, n (%) 74 (54.0) 38 (61.3) 15 (53.6)
Race n (%)
Caucasian 81 (59.1) 31 (50.0) 14 (50.0)
African American 50 (36.5) 28 (45.2) 14 (50.0)
Education level, n (%)
High school or less 46 (33.6) 27 (43.5) 14 (50.0)
College 68 (49.6) 21 (33.9) 9 (32.1)
Advanced degree 10 (7.3) 8 (12.9) 2 (7.1)
Unable to obtain 13 (9.5) 6 (9.7) 3 (10.8)
Past history of VTE, n (%) 12 (8.8) 9 (14.5) 2 (7.1)
Type of unit, n (%)
Medical 59 (43.1) 24 (38.7) 17 (60.7)
Surgical 78 (56.9) 38 (61.3) 11 (39.3)
Documented refusal of ordered prophylaxis, n (%) 71 (51.8) 20 (32.3) 9 (32.1)
Length of hospital stay prior to inclusion in study, d, median (IQR) 4.0 (3.07.0) 3.0 (3.05.0) 4.0 (2.05.0)
Patient Preferences and Rationale for Route of Administration for Pharmacological Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis
Patients preferring enteral route, n (%) 137 (60.4)
Dislike of needles 41 (30.0)
Pain from injection 38 (27.7)
Ease of use 18 (13.1)
Bruising from injection 9 (6.6)
Other/no rationale 31 (22.6)
Patients preferring injection route, n (%) 62 (27.5)
Faster onset of action 25 (40.3)
Pill burden 11 (17.7)
Ease of use 9 (14.5)
Other/no rationale 17 (27.5)
Patients with no preference, n (%) 28 (12.4)

DISCUSSION

Using a mixed‐methods approach, we report the first survey evaluating patient preferences regarding pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. We found that a majority of patients preferred an oral route of administration. Nevertheless, a substantial number of patients favored a subcutaneous route of administration believing it to be associated with a faster onset of action. Of interest, patients favoring subcutaneous injections were significantly less likely to refuse doses of ordered VTE prophylaxis. Given that all patients were prescribed a subcutaneous form of VTE prophylaxis, matching patient preference to VTE prophylaxis prescription could potentially increase adherence and reduce patient refusal of ordered prophylaxis. Considering the large number of patients who preferred an oral route of administration, the availability of an oral formulation may potentially result in improved adherence to inpatient VTE prophylaxis.

Our findings have significant implications for healthcare providers, and for patient safety and quality‐improvement researchers. VTE prophylaxis is an important patient‐safety practice, particularly for medically ill patients, which is believed to be underprescribed.[7] Recent studies have demonstrated that a significant number of doses of VTE prophylaxis are not administered, primarily due to patient refusal.[6] Our data indicate that tailoring the route of prophylaxis administration to patient preference may represent a feasible strategy to improve VTE prophylaxis administration rates. Recently, several target‐specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) have been approved for a variety of clinical indications, and all have been investigated for VTE prophylaxis.[7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15] However, no agent is currently US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved for primary prevention of VTE, although apixaban and rivaroxaban are FDA approved for VTE prevention in joint replacement.[13, 14] Although in some instances these TSOACs were noted to demonstrate only equivalent efficacy to standard subcutaneous forms of VTE prophylaxis, our data suggest that perhaps in some patients, use of these agents may result in better outcomes due to improved adherence to therapy due to a preferred oral route of administration. We think this hypothesis warrants further investigation.

Our study also underscores the importance of considering patient preferences when caring for patients as emphasized by the 2012 ACCP guidelines.[1] Our results indicate that consideration of patient preferences may lead to better patient care and better outcomes. Interestingly, there were no differences in preference based on education level or the type of service to which the patient was admitted. Clarification of uninformed opinions regarding the rationale for preference may also lead to more informed decisions by patients.

This study has a number of limitations. We only included patients on the internal medicine and general surgical services. It is possible that patients on other specialty services may have different opinions regarding prophylaxis that were not captured in our sample. Similarly, our sample size was limited, and approximately 15% of potential subjects did not participate. We do believe that our population is reflective of our institution based upon our previously published evaluation of multiple hospital units and the inclusion of low‐ and high‐performing units on both the medical and surgical services. Nevertheless, we believe that much more investigation of patient perspectives on VTE prophylaxis needs to be done to inform decision making, including the impact of patient preferences on VTE‐related outcomes. Additionally, we did not evaluate potential predictors of preference including admission diagnosis and duration of hospital length of stay.

In conclusion, we conducted a mixed‐methods analysis of patient preferences regarding pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. Matching patient preference to ordered VTE prophylaxis may increase adherence to ordered prophylaxis. In this era of increasingly patient‐centered healthcare and expanding options for VTE prophylaxis, we believe information on patient preferences will be helpful to tailoring options for prevention and treatment.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Disclosures: Dr. Haut is the primary investigator of the Mentored Clinician Scientist Development Award K08 1K08HS017952‐01 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality entitled Does Screening Variability Make DVT an Unreliable Quality Measure of Trauma Care? Dr. Haut receives royalties from Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins for a book he coauthored (Avoiding Common ICU Errors). He has received honoraria for various speaking engagements regarding clinical, quality, and safety topics and has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. Dr. Streiff has received research funding from Sanofi‐Aventis and Bristol‐Myers Squibb; honoraria for Continuing Medial Education lectures from Sanofi‐Aventis and Ortho‐McNeil; consulted for Sanofi‐Aventis, Eisai, Daiichi‐Sankyo, and Janssen HealthCare; and has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. Mr. Lau, Drs. Haut, Streiff, and Shermock are supported by a contract from the Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute titled Preventing Venous Thromboembolism: Empowering Patients and Enabling Patient‐Centered Care via Health Information Technology (CE‐12‐11‐4489). Ms. Hobson has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. All others have no relevant funding or conflicts of interest to report.

The 2012 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy conducted a systematic review focusing on patient values and preferences regarding antithrombotic therapy, including thromboprophylaxis.[1] They found that patient values and preferences are highly variable and should be considered when developing future clinical practice guidelines. Notably, there were no studies evaluating patient preferences for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, which is prescribed for the vast majority of hospitalized patients.

Historically, interventions to prevent VTE have focused on increasing prescriptions of prophylaxis. At the Johns Hopkins Hospital, we implemented a mandatory clinical decision support tool in our computerized provider order entry system.[2] Following implementation of this tool, prescription of risk‐appropriate VTE prophylaxis dramatically increased for both medical and surgical patients.[3, 4, 5] These efforts were made with the implicit and incorrect assumption that prescribed medication doses will always be administered to patients, when in fact patient refusal is a leading cause of nonadministration. Studies of VTE prophylaxis administration have reported that 10% to 12% of doses are not administered to patients.[6] Alarmingly, it has been reported that among medically ill patients, between 10% and 30% of doses are not administered, with patient refusal as the most frequently documented reason.

The purpose of this study was to assess patient preferences regarding pharmacological VTE prophylaxis.

METHODS

Study Design

A sample of consecutive hospitalized patients on select medicine and surgical floors previously identified as low‐ and high‐performing units at our institution in regard to administration rates of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was assembled from a daily electronic report of patients prescribed pharmacological VTE prophylaxis (Allscripts Sunrise, Chicago, IL) from December 2012 to March 2013. These units were identified in a study conducted at our institution as the lowest‐ and highest‐performing units in regard to incidence of administration of ordered pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. From this data analysis, we chose the 2 lowest‐performing and 2 highest‐performing units on the medical and surgical service. To be eligible for this study, patients had to have an active order for 1 of the following VTE prophylaxis regimens: unfractionated heparin 5000 units or 7500 units administered subcutaneously every 8 or 12 hours, enoxaparin 30 mg administered subcutaneously every 12 hours or 40 mg administered subcutaneously every 24 hours. Participants had to be at least 18 years of age and hospitalized for at least 2 days on their respective units. Patients who were nonEnglish speaking, those previously enrolled in this study, or those unable to provide consent were excluded from the study.

Data Collection

Demographic information was collected, including patient‐reported education level. To determine their preference for VTE prophylaxis, patients were provided a survey, which included being asked, Would you prefer a pill or a shot to prevent blood clots, if they both worked equally well. The survey was created by the study team to collect information from patients regarding their baseline knowledge of VTE and preference regarding pharmacologic prophylaxis. Additional data included the patient's education level to determine potential association with preference. The survey was verbally administered by 1 investigator (A.W.) to all patients. Patients were asked to explain their rationale for their stated preference in regard to VTE prophylaxis. Patient rationale was subsequently coded to allow for uniformity among patient responses based on patterns in responses. Our electronic medication record allows us to identify patients who refused their medication through nursing documentation. Patients with documented refusal of ordered pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis were asked about the rationale for their refusal. This study was approved by the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board.

Statistical Analysis

Quantitative data from the surveys were analyzed using Minitab (Minitab Inc., State College, PA). A [2] test analysis was performed for categorical data, as appropriate. A P value 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Quantitative Results

We interviewed patients regarding their preferred route of administration of VTE prophylaxis. Overall, 339 patients were screened for this study. Sixty patients were not eligible to participate. Forty‐seven were unable to provide consent, and 13 were nonEnglish speaking. Of the 269 remaining eligible patients, 227 (84.4%) consented to participate.

Baseline demographics of the participants are presented in Table 1, categorized on the basis of their preferred route of administration for VTE prophylaxis. A majority of patients indicated a preference for an oral formulation of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. There was no association between education level or service type on preference. Preference for an oral formulation was largely influenced by patient‐reported pain and bruising associated with subcutaneous administration (Table 2). A substantial majority of patients reporting a preference for a subcutaneous formulation and emphasized a belief that this route was associated with a faster onset of action. Among patients who preferred an oral formulation (n=137), 71 patients (51.8%) were documented as having refused at least 1 dose of ordered VTE prophylaxis. Patients who preferred a subcutaneous route of VTE prophylaxis were less likely to refuse prophylaxis, with only 22 patients (35.5%) having a documented refusal of at least 1 dose (P0.0001).

Patient Demographics in Relation to Prophylaxis Preference
Enteral, n=137 Parenteral, n=62 No Preference, n=28
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

Age, y, mean ( SD) 49.5 (14.7) 51.7 (16.1) 48.9 (14.6)
Male, n (%) 74 (54.0) 38 (61.3) 15 (53.6)
Race n (%)
Caucasian 81 (59.1) 31 (50.0) 14 (50.0)
African American 50 (36.5) 28 (45.2) 14 (50.0)
Education level, n (%)
High school or less 46 (33.6) 27 (43.5) 14 (50.0)
College 68 (49.6) 21 (33.9) 9 (32.1)
Advanced degree 10 (7.3) 8 (12.9) 2 (7.1)
Unable to obtain 13 (9.5) 6 (9.7) 3 (10.8)
Past history of VTE, n (%) 12 (8.8) 9 (14.5) 2 (7.1)
Type of unit, n (%)
Medical 59 (43.1) 24 (38.7) 17 (60.7)
Surgical 78 (56.9) 38 (61.3) 11 (39.3)
Documented refusal of ordered prophylaxis, n (%) 71 (51.8) 20 (32.3) 9 (32.1)
Length of hospital stay prior to inclusion in study, d, median (IQR) 4.0 (3.07.0) 3.0 (3.05.0) 4.0 (2.05.0)
Patient Preferences and Rationale for Route of Administration for Pharmacological Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis
Patients preferring enteral route, n (%) 137 (60.4)
Dislike of needles 41 (30.0)
Pain from injection 38 (27.7)
Ease of use 18 (13.1)
Bruising from injection 9 (6.6)
Other/no rationale 31 (22.6)
Patients preferring injection route, n (%) 62 (27.5)
Faster onset of action 25 (40.3)
Pill burden 11 (17.7)
Ease of use 9 (14.5)
Other/no rationale 17 (27.5)
Patients with no preference, n (%) 28 (12.4)

DISCUSSION

Using a mixed‐methods approach, we report the first survey evaluating patient preferences regarding pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. We found that a majority of patients preferred an oral route of administration. Nevertheless, a substantial number of patients favored a subcutaneous route of administration believing it to be associated with a faster onset of action. Of interest, patients favoring subcutaneous injections were significantly less likely to refuse doses of ordered VTE prophylaxis. Given that all patients were prescribed a subcutaneous form of VTE prophylaxis, matching patient preference to VTE prophylaxis prescription could potentially increase adherence and reduce patient refusal of ordered prophylaxis. Considering the large number of patients who preferred an oral route of administration, the availability of an oral formulation may potentially result in improved adherence to inpatient VTE prophylaxis.

Our findings have significant implications for healthcare providers, and for patient safety and quality‐improvement researchers. VTE prophylaxis is an important patient‐safety practice, particularly for medically ill patients, which is believed to be underprescribed.[7] Recent studies have demonstrated that a significant number of doses of VTE prophylaxis are not administered, primarily due to patient refusal.[6] Our data indicate that tailoring the route of prophylaxis administration to patient preference may represent a feasible strategy to improve VTE prophylaxis administration rates. Recently, several target‐specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) have been approved for a variety of clinical indications, and all have been investigated for VTE prophylaxis.[7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15] However, no agent is currently US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved for primary prevention of VTE, although apixaban and rivaroxaban are FDA approved for VTE prevention in joint replacement.[13, 14] Although in some instances these TSOACs were noted to demonstrate only equivalent efficacy to standard subcutaneous forms of VTE prophylaxis, our data suggest that perhaps in some patients, use of these agents may result in better outcomes due to improved adherence to therapy due to a preferred oral route of administration. We think this hypothesis warrants further investigation.

Our study also underscores the importance of considering patient preferences when caring for patients as emphasized by the 2012 ACCP guidelines.[1] Our results indicate that consideration of patient preferences may lead to better patient care and better outcomes. Interestingly, there were no differences in preference based on education level or the type of service to which the patient was admitted. Clarification of uninformed opinions regarding the rationale for preference may also lead to more informed decisions by patients.

This study has a number of limitations. We only included patients on the internal medicine and general surgical services. It is possible that patients on other specialty services may have different opinions regarding prophylaxis that were not captured in our sample. Similarly, our sample size was limited, and approximately 15% of potential subjects did not participate. We do believe that our population is reflective of our institution based upon our previously published evaluation of multiple hospital units and the inclusion of low‐ and high‐performing units on both the medical and surgical services. Nevertheless, we believe that much more investigation of patient perspectives on VTE prophylaxis needs to be done to inform decision making, including the impact of patient preferences on VTE‐related outcomes. Additionally, we did not evaluate potential predictors of preference including admission diagnosis and duration of hospital length of stay.

In conclusion, we conducted a mixed‐methods analysis of patient preferences regarding pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. Matching patient preference to ordered VTE prophylaxis may increase adherence to ordered prophylaxis. In this era of increasingly patient‐centered healthcare and expanding options for VTE prophylaxis, we believe information on patient preferences will be helpful to tailoring options for prevention and treatment.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Disclosures: Dr. Haut is the primary investigator of the Mentored Clinician Scientist Development Award K08 1K08HS017952‐01 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality entitled Does Screening Variability Make DVT an Unreliable Quality Measure of Trauma Care? Dr. Haut receives royalties from Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins for a book he coauthored (Avoiding Common ICU Errors). He has received honoraria for various speaking engagements regarding clinical, quality, and safety topics and has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. Dr. Streiff has received research funding from Sanofi‐Aventis and Bristol‐Myers Squibb; honoraria for Continuing Medial Education lectures from Sanofi‐Aventis and Ortho‐McNeil; consulted for Sanofi‐Aventis, Eisai, Daiichi‐Sankyo, and Janssen HealthCare; and has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. Mr. Lau, Drs. Haut, Streiff, and Shermock are supported by a contract from the Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute titled Preventing Venous Thromboembolism: Empowering Patients and Enabling Patient‐Centered Care via Health Information Technology (CE‐12‐11‐4489). Ms. Hobson has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. All others have no relevant funding or conflicts of interest to report.

References
  1. MacLean S, Mulla S, Akl EA, et al. Patient values and preferences in decision making for antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review. Chest. 2012;141(2):e1Se23S.
  2. Streiff MB, Carolan HT, Hobson DB, et al. Lessons from the Johns Hopkins Multi‐Disciplinary Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prevention Collaborative. BMJ. 2012;344:e3935.
  3. Zeidan AM, Streiff MB, Lau BD, et al. Impact of a venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis “smart order set”: improved compliance, fewer events. Am J Hematol. 2013;88(7):545549.
  4. Haut ER, Lau BD, Kraenzlin FS, et al. Improved prophylaxis and decreased preventable harm with a mandatory computerized clinical decision support tool for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in trauma patients. Arch Surg. 2012;147(10):901907.
  5. Aboagye JK, Lau BD, Schneider EB, Streiff MB, Haut ER. Linking processes and outcomes: a key strategy to prevent and report harm from venous thromboembolism in surgical patients. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(3):299300.
  6. Shermock KM, Lau BD, Haut ER, et al. Patterns of non‐administration of ordered doses of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: implications for intervention strategies. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66311.
  7. Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann J, et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross‐sectional study. Lancet. 2008;371:387394.
  8. Eriksson BI, Borris LC, Friedman LJ, et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:27652775.
  9. Lassen MR, Ageno W, Borris LC, et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthoplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:27762786.
  10. Lassen MR, Raskob GE, Gallus A, Pineo G, Chen D, Portman RJ. Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:594604.
  11. Lassen MR, Raskob GE, Gallus A, Pineo G, Chen D, Hornick P. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement (ADVANCE‐2): a randomized double‐blind trial. Lancet. 2010;275:807815.
  12. Turpie AG, Lassen MR, Eriksson BI, et al. Rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty. Pooled analysis of four studies. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105:444453.
  13. Goldhaber SZ, Leizorovicz A, Kakkar AK, et al. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:21672177.
  14. Beyer‐Westendorf J, Lützner J, Donath L, et al. Efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis with low‐molecular‐weight heparin or rivaroxaban in hip and knee replacement surgery: findings from the ORTHO‐TEP registry. Thromb Haemost. 2013;109:154163.
  15. Cohen AT, Spiro TE, Büller HR, et al. Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:513523.
References
  1. MacLean S, Mulla S, Akl EA, et al. Patient values and preferences in decision making for antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review. Chest. 2012;141(2):e1Se23S.
  2. Streiff MB, Carolan HT, Hobson DB, et al. Lessons from the Johns Hopkins Multi‐Disciplinary Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prevention Collaborative. BMJ. 2012;344:e3935.
  3. Zeidan AM, Streiff MB, Lau BD, et al. Impact of a venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis “smart order set”: improved compliance, fewer events. Am J Hematol. 2013;88(7):545549.
  4. Haut ER, Lau BD, Kraenzlin FS, et al. Improved prophylaxis and decreased preventable harm with a mandatory computerized clinical decision support tool for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in trauma patients. Arch Surg. 2012;147(10):901907.
  5. Aboagye JK, Lau BD, Schneider EB, Streiff MB, Haut ER. Linking processes and outcomes: a key strategy to prevent and report harm from venous thromboembolism in surgical patients. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(3):299300.
  6. Shermock KM, Lau BD, Haut ER, et al. Patterns of non‐administration of ordered doses of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: implications for intervention strategies. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66311.
  7. Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann J, et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross‐sectional study. Lancet. 2008;371:387394.
  8. Eriksson BI, Borris LC, Friedman LJ, et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:27652775.
  9. Lassen MR, Ageno W, Borris LC, et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthoplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:27762786.
  10. Lassen MR, Raskob GE, Gallus A, Pineo G, Chen D, Portman RJ. Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:594604.
  11. Lassen MR, Raskob GE, Gallus A, Pineo G, Chen D, Hornick P. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement (ADVANCE‐2): a randomized double‐blind trial. Lancet. 2010;275:807815.
  12. Turpie AG, Lassen MR, Eriksson BI, et al. Rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty. Pooled analysis of four studies. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105:444453.
  13. Goldhaber SZ, Leizorovicz A, Kakkar AK, et al. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:21672177.
  14. Beyer‐Westendorf J, Lützner J, Donath L, et al. Efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis with low‐molecular‐weight heparin or rivaroxaban in hip and knee replacement surgery: findings from the ORTHO‐TEP registry. Thromb Haemost. 2013;109:154163.
  15. Cohen AT, Spiro TE, Büller HR, et al. Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:513523.
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(2)
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(2)
Page Number
108-111
Page Number
108-111
Article Type
Display Headline
Patient preferences regarding pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis
Display Headline
Patient preferences regarding pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis
Sections
Article Source
© 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine
Disallow All Ads
Correspondence Location
Address for correspondence and reprint requests: Kenneth M. Shermock, PharmD, PhD, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287; Telephone: 410‐502‐7674; Fax: 410‐955‐0287; E‐mail: [email protected]
Content Gating
Gated (full article locked unless allowed per User)
Gating Strategy
First Peek Free
Article PDF Media
Media Files

Letter to the Editor

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
In response to “Front‐line ordering clinicians: Matching workforce to workload”

We thank Dr. Louwrens for his response to our article, Front‐Line Ordering Clinicians: Matching Workforce to Workload.[1] We agree that matching workload and workforce is essential to optimizing health and financial outcomes, as well as patient and workforce satisfaction.

The articles by Elliot et al.[2] and Wachter[3] are important discussions on the relationships among workforce, efficiency, and quality outcomes. However, as Wachter notes, the same ratios are not applicable to all settings. With this in mind, our matrix tool allows individual practice settings to modify variables (such as the desired front‐line ordering clinician to workload units) based on local circumstances and validation. The tool also allows users to add variables (such as support infrastructure) that may be relevant to their setting.

We also appreciate Dr. Louwrens' comments on factors that impede the optimal matching of workload to workforce. Although barriers and resistance will always exist, we think that a data‐driven approach to measuring workload and workforce can help demonstrate need in a systematic way that can help overcome pushback. Further research correlating use of the tool to improved quality and cost outcomes will help demonstrate to institutions and payers that better matching of workforce to workload, including through flexible staffing strategies, yields higher‐value outcomes.

References
  1. Fieldston ES, Zaoutis LB, Hicks PJ, et al. Front‐line ordering clinicians: matching workforce to workload. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(7):457462.
  2. Elliot DJ, Young RS, Brice J, et al. Effect of hospitalist workload on the quality and efficiency of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):786793.
  3. Wachter RM. Hospitalist workload: the search for the magic number. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):794795.
Article PDF
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(1)
Page Number
68-68
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF

We thank Dr. Louwrens for his response to our article, Front‐Line Ordering Clinicians: Matching Workforce to Workload.[1] We agree that matching workload and workforce is essential to optimizing health and financial outcomes, as well as patient and workforce satisfaction.

The articles by Elliot et al.[2] and Wachter[3] are important discussions on the relationships among workforce, efficiency, and quality outcomes. However, as Wachter notes, the same ratios are not applicable to all settings. With this in mind, our matrix tool allows individual practice settings to modify variables (such as the desired front‐line ordering clinician to workload units) based on local circumstances and validation. The tool also allows users to add variables (such as support infrastructure) that may be relevant to their setting.

We also appreciate Dr. Louwrens' comments on factors that impede the optimal matching of workload to workforce. Although barriers and resistance will always exist, we think that a data‐driven approach to measuring workload and workforce can help demonstrate need in a systematic way that can help overcome pushback. Further research correlating use of the tool to improved quality and cost outcomes will help demonstrate to institutions and payers that better matching of workforce to workload, including through flexible staffing strategies, yields higher‐value outcomes.

We thank Dr. Louwrens for his response to our article, Front‐Line Ordering Clinicians: Matching Workforce to Workload.[1] We agree that matching workload and workforce is essential to optimizing health and financial outcomes, as well as patient and workforce satisfaction.

The articles by Elliot et al.[2] and Wachter[3] are important discussions on the relationships among workforce, efficiency, and quality outcomes. However, as Wachter notes, the same ratios are not applicable to all settings. With this in mind, our matrix tool allows individual practice settings to modify variables (such as the desired front‐line ordering clinician to workload units) based on local circumstances and validation. The tool also allows users to add variables (such as support infrastructure) that may be relevant to their setting.

We also appreciate Dr. Louwrens' comments on factors that impede the optimal matching of workload to workforce. Although barriers and resistance will always exist, we think that a data‐driven approach to measuring workload and workforce can help demonstrate need in a systematic way that can help overcome pushback. Further research correlating use of the tool to improved quality and cost outcomes will help demonstrate to institutions and payers that better matching of workforce to workload, including through flexible staffing strategies, yields higher‐value outcomes.

References
  1. Fieldston ES, Zaoutis LB, Hicks PJ, et al. Front‐line ordering clinicians: matching workforce to workload. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(7):457462.
  2. Elliot DJ, Young RS, Brice J, et al. Effect of hospitalist workload on the quality and efficiency of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):786793.
  3. Wachter RM. Hospitalist workload: the search for the magic number. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):794795.
References
  1. Fieldston ES, Zaoutis LB, Hicks PJ, et al. Front‐line ordering clinicians: matching workforce to workload. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(7):457462.
  2. Elliot DJ, Young RS, Brice J, et al. Effect of hospitalist workload on the quality and efficiency of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):786793.
  3. Wachter RM. Hospitalist workload: the search for the magic number. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):794795.
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(1)
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(1)
Page Number
68-68
Page Number
68-68
Article Type
Display Headline
In response to “Front‐line ordering clinicians: Matching workforce to workload”
Display Headline
In response to “Front‐line ordering clinicians: Matching workforce to workload”
Sections
Article Source
© 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
Gated (full article locked unless allowed per User)
Gating Strategy
First Peek Free
Article PDF Media

Letter to the Editor

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
In reference to “Front‐line ordering clinicians: Matching workforce to workload”

I applaud the authors of Front‐Line Ordering Clinicians: Matching Workforce to Workload[1] for opening up a dialogue addressing an escalating workforce‐workload mismatch.

Indirectly pertaining to workforce and workload, Elliot et al. and Wachter published data supporting 15 patients a day, improving length of stay and lowering costs.[2, 3] Although unproven, many believe a cap may produce care of higher quality and safety.

Some regional factors impeding an optimal patient workload are: (1) flexibility limitations (as touted in the matrix care model), (2) recruitment difficulties, (3) realistic usefulness of support infrastructure (eg, variation in electronic health record ease of use, midlevel/resident availability, transitions of care support infrastructure), (4) payer mix dictating inadequate workforce, and (5) failure of hospital administrators in recognizing differences and adapting operations management to the work of physicians (high hospitalist turnover might suggest such an ailment).

Physicians in denial over the adverse effects of excessive load, or simply concerned over financial losses, may obstruct necessary safety changes. Astonishingly, and shamefully, agents for safety change can be labeled as counter‐ or unproductive!

Mandating a more manageable workload, somewhat akin to the Federal Aviation Administration's rest rules for pilots, already soundly validated by established fatigue science, may be on the horizon. Further studies into the elusive world of physician workflow might guide this.

References
  1. Fieldston ES, Zaoutis LB, Hicks PJ, et al. Front‐line ordering clinicians: matching workforce to workload. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(7):457462.
  2. Elliot DJ, Young RS, Brice J, et al. Effect of hospitalist workload on the quality and efficiency of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):786793.
  3. Wachter RM. Hospitalist workload: the search for the magic number. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):794795.
Article PDF
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(1)
Page Number
67-67
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF

I applaud the authors of Front‐Line Ordering Clinicians: Matching Workforce to Workload[1] for opening up a dialogue addressing an escalating workforce‐workload mismatch.

Indirectly pertaining to workforce and workload, Elliot et al. and Wachter published data supporting 15 patients a day, improving length of stay and lowering costs.[2, 3] Although unproven, many believe a cap may produce care of higher quality and safety.

Some regional factors impeding an optimal patient workload are: (1) flexibility limitations (as touted in the matrix care model), (2) recruitment difficulties, (3) realistic usefulness of support infrastructure (eg, variation in electronic health record ease of use, midlevel/resident availability, transitions of care support infrastructure), (4) payer mix dictating inadequate workforce, and (5) failure of hospital administrators in recognizing differences and adapting operations management to the work of physicians (high hospitalist turnover might suggest such an ailment).

Physicians in denial over the adverse effects of excessive load, or simply concerned over financial losses, may obstruct necessary safety changes. Astonishingly, and shamefully, agents for safety change can be labeled as counter‐ or unproductive!

Mandating a more manageable workload, somewhat akin to the Federal Aviation Administration's rest rules for pilots, already soundly validated by established fatigue science, may be on the horizon. Further studies into the elusive world of physician workflow might guide this.

I applaud the authors of Front‐Line Ordering Clinicians: Matching Workforce to Workload[1] for opening up a dialogue addressing an escalating workforce‐workload mismatch.

Indirectly pertaining to workforce and workload, Elliot et al. and Wachter published data supporting 15 patients a day, improving length of stay and lowering costs.[2, 3] Although unproven, many believe a cap may produce care of higher quality and safety.

Some regional factors impeding an optimal patient workload are: (1) flexibility limitations (as touted in the matrix care model), (2) recruitment difficulties, (3) realistic usefulness of support infrastructure (eg, variation in electronic health record ease of use, midlevel/resident availability, transitions of care support infrastructure), (4) payer mix dictating inadequate workforce, and (5) failure of hospital administrators in recognizing differences and adapting operations management to the work of physicians (high hospitalist turnover might suggest such an ailment).

Physicians in denial over the adverse effects of excessive load, or simply concerned over financial losses, may obstruct necessary safety changes. Astonishingly, and shamefully, agents for safety change can be labeled as counter‐ or unproductive!

Mandating a more manageable workload, somewhat akin to the Federal Aviation Administration's rest rules for pilots, already soundly validated by established fatigue science, may be on the horizon. Further studies into the elusive world of physician workflow might guide this.

References
  1. Fieldston ES, Zaoutis LB, Hicks PJ, et al. Front‐line ordering clinicians: matching workforce to workload. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(7):457462.
  2. Elliot DJ, Young RS, Brice J, et al. Effect of hospitalist workload on the quality and efficiency of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):786793.
  3. Wachter RM. Hospitalist workload: the search for the magic number. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):794795.
References
  1. Fieldston ES, Zaoutis LB, Hicks PJ, et al. Front‐line ordering clinicians: matching workforce to workload. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(7):457462.
  2. Elliot DJ, Young RS, Brice J, et al. Effect of hospitalist workload on the quality and efficiency of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):786793.
  3. Wachter RM. Hospitalist workload: the search for the magic number. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):794795.
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(1)
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(1)
Page Number
67-67
Page Number
67-67
Article Type
Display Headline
In reference to “Front‐line ordering clinicians: Matching workforce to workload”
Display Headline
In reference to “Front‐line ordering clinicians: Matching workforce to workload”
Sections
Article Source
© 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
Gated (full article locked unless allowed per User)
Gating Strategy
First Peek Free
Article PDF Media

Best practices for the surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Best practices for the surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy

During the 43rd AAGL Global Congress, held November 17–21 in Vancouver, British Columbia, Sarah L. Cohen, MD, MPH, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, stepped attendees through diagnosis and surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy, noting the approaches backed by the highest-quality data.

The incidence of adnexal masses in pregnancy is 1 in every 600 live births. A mass can be benign or malignant. Among benign masses found in pregnancy are functional cysts, teratomas, and the corpus luteum.

Work-up
Ultrasound imaging is a valuable component of the work-up, owing to its risk-free nature. Magnetic resonance imaging may be appropriate in selected cases, but gadolinium contrast should be avoided.

In pregnancy, the aim is to limit ionizing radiation to less than 5 to 10 rads to minimize the risk of childhood malignancy/leukemia, with no single imaging study exceeding 5 rads.

Tumor markers may be helpful, but careful interpretation is critical, taking into account the effects of pregnancy itself on CA-125 (which peaks in the first trimester), human chorionic gonadotropin, alpha fetoprotein, inhibin A, and lactate dehydrogenase.

When expectant management may be appropriate
Watchful waiting may be considered for simple cysts less than 6 cm in size, provided the patient is asymptomatic with no signs of malignancy.

Surgery is indicated when the patient is symptomatic, when there is a concern for malignancy, and when a persistent mass exceeds 10 cm in size.

As always, elective surgery is preferable, as emergent surgery in pregnancy is associated with a risk of preterm labor of 22% to 35%.

Optimal timing of surgery
Surgery can be performed safely in any trimester, provided the gynecologist is aware of special concerns. For example, in the first trimester, organogenesis is under way and the corpus luteum is still present. If the corpus luteum is removed, progesterone supplementation is necessary.

When surgery can be postponed to the second trimester, it allows time for possible resolution of the mass.

Mode of surgery
Laparoscopy allows for faster recovery, less pain (and, therefore, lower narcotic exposure to the fetus), and improved maternal ventilation.

Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism is indicated through the use of pneumatic compression devices and, when appropriate, heparin.

Initial port placement can be performed using a Hassan technique, Veress needle, or optical trocar.

Insufflation pressures of 10 to 15 mm Hg are safe, with intraoperative monitoring of carbon dioxide. 

Availability of guidelines
Surgeons should make use of guidelines, when feasible, to guide surgery. For example, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) publishes guidelines on surgery during pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also offers guidelines.

Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Janelle Yates, Senior Editor

Issue
OBG Management - 26(11)
Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
AAGL,AAGL Global Congress,Sarah L. Cohen MD MPH,diagnosis,surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy,surgery,adnexal masses, functional cysts,teratomas,corpus luteum,ionizing radiation,malignancy,leukemia,narcotic exposure,Prophylaxis,Hassan technique
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Janelle Yates, Senior Editor

Author and Disclosure Information

Janelle Yates, Senior Editor

Related Articles

During the 43rd AAGL Global Congress, held November 17–21 in Vancouver, British Columbia, Sarah L. Cohen, MD, MPH, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, stepped attendees through diagnosis and surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy, noting the approaches backed by the highest-quality data.

The incidence of adnexal masses in pregnancy is 1 in every 600 live births. A mass can be benign or malignant. Among benign masses found in pregnancy are functional cysts, teratomas, and the corpus luteum.

Work-up
Ultrasound imaging is a valuable component of the work-up, owing to its risk-free nature. Magnetic resonance imaging may be appropriate in selected cases, but gadolinium contrast should be avoided.

In pregnancy, the aim is to limit ionizing radiation to less than 5 to 10 rads to minimize the risk of childhood malignancy/leukemia, with no single imaging study exceeding 5 rads.

Tumor markers may be helpful, but careful interpretation is critical, taking into account the effects of pregnancy itself on CA-125 (which peaks in the first trimester), human chorionic gonadotropin, alpha fetoprotein, inhibin A, and lactate dehydrogenase.

When expectant management may be appropriate
Watchful waiting may be considered for simple cysts less than 6 cm in size, provided the patient is asymptomatic with no signs of malignancy.

Surgery is indicated when the patient is symptomatic, when there is a concern for malignancy, and when a persistent mass exceeds 10 cm in size.

As always, elective surgery is preferable, as emergent surgery in pregnancy is associated with a risk of preterm labor of 22% to 35%.

Optimal timing of surgery
Surgery can be performed safely in any trimester, provided the gynecologist is aware of special concerns. For example, in the first trimester, organogenesis is under way and the corpus luteum is still present. If the corpus luteum is removed, progesterone supplementation is necessary.

When surgery can be postponed to the second trimester, it allows time for possible resolution of the mass.

Mode of surgery
Laparoscopy allows for faster recovery, less pain (and, therefore, lower narcotic exposure to the fetus), and improved maternal ventilation.

Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism is indicated through the use of pneumatic compression devices and, when appropriate, heparin.

Initial port placement can be performed using a Hassan technique, Veress needle, or optical trocar.

Insufflation pressures of 10 to 15 mm Hg are safe, with intraoperative monitoring of carbon dioxide. 

Availability of guidelines
Surgeons should make use of guidelines, when feasible, to guide surgery. For example, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) publishes guidelines on surgery during pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also offers guidelines.

Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

During the 43rd AAGL Global Congress, held November 17–21 in Vancouver, British Columbia, Sarah L. Cohen, MD, MPH, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, stepped attendees through diagnosis and surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy, noting the approaches backed by the highest-quality data.

The incidence of adnexal masses in pregnancy is 1 in every 600 live births. A mass can be benign or malignant. Among benign masses found in pregnancy are functional cysts, teratomas, and the corpus luteum.

Work-up
Ultrasound imaging is a valuable component of the work-up, owing to its risk-free nature. Magnetic resonance imaging may be appropriate in selected cases, but gadolinium contrast should be avoided.

In pregnancy, the aim is to limit ionizing radiation to less than 5 to 10 rads to minimize the risk of childhood malignancy/leukemia, with no single imaging study exceeding 5 rads.

Tumor markers may be helpful, but careful interpretation is critical, taking into account the effects of pregnancy itself on CA-125 (which peaks in the first trimester), human chorionic gonadotropin, alpha fetoprotein, inhibin A, and lactate dehydrogenase.

When expectant management may be appropriate
Watchful waiting may be considered for simple cysts less than 6 cm in size, provided the patient is asymptomatic with no signs of malignancy.

Surgery is indicated when the patient is symptomatic, when there is a concern for malignancy, and when a persistent mass exceeds 10 cm in size.

As always, elective surgery is preferable, as emergent surgery in pregnancy is associated with a risk of preterm labor of 22% to 35%.

Optimal timing of surgery
Surgery can be performed safely in any trimester, provided the gynecologist is aware of special concerns. For example, in the first trimester, organogenesis is under way and the corpus luteum is still present. If the corpus luteum is removed, progesterone supplementation is necessary.

When surgery can be postponed to the second trimester, it allows time for possible resolution of the mass.

Mode of surgery
Laparoscopy allows for faster recovery, less pain (and, therefore, lower narcotic exposure to the fetus), and improved maternal ventilation.

Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism is indicated through the use of pneumatic compression devices and, when appropriate, heparin.

Initial port placement can be performed using a Hassan technique, Veress needle, or optical trocar.

Insufflation pressures of 10 to 15 mm Hg are safe, with intraoperative monitoring of carbon dioxide. 

Availability of guidelines
Surgeons should make use of guidelines, when feasible, to guide surgery. For example, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) publishes guidelines on surgery during pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also offers guidelines.

Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

References

References

Issue
OBG Management - 26(11)
Issue
OBG Management - 26(11)
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Best practices for the surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy
Display Headline
Best practices for the surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy
Legacy Keywords
AAGL,AAGL Global Congress,Sarah L. Cohen MD MPH,diagnosis,surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy,surgery,adnexal masses, functional cysts,teratomas,corpus luteum,ionizing radiation,malignancy,leukemia,narcotic exposure,Prophylaxis,Hassan technique
Legacy Keywords
AAGL,AAGL Global Congress,Sarah L. Cohen MD MPH,diagnosis,surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy,surgery,adnexal masses, functional cysts,teratomas,corpus luteum,ionizing radiation,malignancy,leukemia,narcotic exposure,Prophylaxis,Hassan technique
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Sickle cell anemia trial halted because of early success

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Sickle cell anemia trial halted because of early success

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute announced the premature termination of TWiTCH, its clinical trial of children with sickle cell disease, because researchers met their goal ahead of schedule.

The NHLBI stated in a press release that the trial was stopped in agreement with the recommendations of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) – an independent group of experts that regularly reviews accumulating data from ongoing clinical trials and makes recommendations to investigators and sponsors on how to move forward.

“The DSMB’s planned first interim analysis of the TWiTCH study data indicated that the study had reached its primary and most important endpoint,” the NHLBI said in the statement. “As such, they recommended that the study end due to early results, particularly given that the strength of the statistical finding was unlikely to change with the collection of additional data.”

TWiTCH (Transcranial Doppler with Transfusions Changing to Hydroxyurea) was a phase III clinical trial created to determine whether daily doses of hydroxyurea lower the transcranial Doppler (TCD) blood velocity in children with sickle cell disease with the same efficacy as that of blood transfusions. Currently, hydroxyurea is the only Food and Drug Administration–approved drug for sickle cell disease, a disorder that affects children and puts them at increased risk for stroke if they have high TCD blood flow velocities.

According to the data accrued by the researchers prior to the study’s termination, hydroxyurea was found to be “not inferior to (that is, no worse than) regular blood transfusions in lowering TCD velocities in children with sickle cell disease who are at high risk for stroke.”

“The results of TWiTCH will allow the families of children with sickle cell disease and who are at increased risk of stroke, to choose between two equally effective preventive therapies,” Dr. Keith Hoots, director of the NHLBI’s division of blood diseases and resources, said in an interview. “The TWiTCH trial is the most recent example of NHLBI’s ongoing commitment to the development of new therapies for the prevention and treatment of stroke in children with sickle cell disease.”

According to information from the American Society of Hematology, the trial included 25 participating centers from around the United States, and was funded by the NHLBI with sponsorship from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.

[email protected]

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
NIH, NHLBI, TCD, TWiTCH, sickle cell, children, transcranial Doppler, stroke, hydroxyurea, blood transfusions
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute announced the premature termination of TWiTCH, its clinical trial of children with sickle cell disease, because researchers met their goal ahead of schedule.

The NHLBI stated in a press release that the trial was stopped in agreement with the recommendations of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) – an independent group of experts that regularly reviews accumulating data from ongoing clinical trials and makes recommendations to investigators and sponsors on how to move forward.

“The DSMB’s planned first interim analysis of the TWiTCH study data indicated that the study had reached its primary and most important endpoint,” the NHLBI said in the statement. “As such, they recommended that the study end due to early results, particularly given that the strength of the statistical finding was unlikely to change with the collection of additional data.”

TWiTCH (Transcranial Doppler with Transfusions Changing to Hydroxyurea) was a phase III clinical trial created to determine whether daily doses of hydroxyurea lower the transcranial Doppler (TCD) blood velocity in children with sickle cell disease with the same efficacy as that of blood transfusions. Currently, hydroxyurea is the only Food and Drug Administration–approved drug for sickle cell disease, a disorder that affects children and puts them at increased risk for stroke if they have high TCD blood flow velocities.

According to the data accrued by the researchers prior to the study’s termination, hydroxyurea was found to be “not inferior to (that is, no worse than) regular blood transfusions in lowering TCD velocities in children with sickle cell disease who are at high risk for stroke.”

“The results of TWiTCH will allow the families of children with sickle cell disease and who are at increased risk of stroke, to choose between two equally effective preventive therapies,” Dr. Keith Hoots, director of the NHLBI’s division of blood diseases and resources, said in an interview. “The TWiTCH trial is the most recent example of NHLBI’s ongoing commitment to the development of new therapies for the prevention and treatment of stroke in children with sickle cell disease.”

According to information from the American Society of Hematology, the trial included 25 participating centers from around the United States, and was funded by the NHLBI with sponsorship from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.

[email protected]

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute announced the premature termination of TWiTCH, its clinical trial of children with sickle cell disease, because researchers met their goal ahead of schedule.

The NHLBI stated in a press release that the trial was stopped in agreement with the recommendations of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) – an independent group of experts that regularly reviews accumulating data from ongoing clinical trials and makes recommendations to investigators and sponsors on how to move forward.

“The DSMB’s planned first interim analysis of the TWiTCH study data indicated that the study had reached its primary and most important endpoint,” the NHLBI said in the statement. “As such, they recommended that the study end due to early results, particularly given that the strength of the statistical finding was unlikely to change with the collection of additional data.”

TWiTCH (Transcranial Doppler with Transfusions Changing to Hydroxyurea) was a phase III clinical trial created to determine whether daily doses of hydroxyurea lower the transcranial Doppler (TCD) blood velocity in children with sickle cell disease with the same efficacy as that of blood transfusions. Currently, hydroxyurea is the only Food and Drug Administration–approved drug for sickle cell disease, a disorder that affects children and puts them at increased risk for stroke if they have high TCD blood flow velocities.

According to the data accrued by the researchers prior to the study’s termination, hydroxyurea was found to be “not inferior to (that is, no worse than) regular blood transfusions in lowering TCD velocities in children with sickle cell disease who are at high risk for stroke.”

“The results of TWiTCH will allow the families of children with sickle cell disease and who are at increased risk of stroke, to choose between two equally effective preventive therapies,” Dr. Keith Hoots, director of the NHLBI’s division of blood diseases and resources, said in an interview. “The TWiTCH trial is the most recent example of NHLBI’s ongoing commitment to the development of new therapies for the prevention and treatment of stroke in children with sickle cell disease.”

According to information from the American Society of Hematology, the trial included 25 participating centers from around the United States, and was funded by the NHLBI with sponsorship from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.

[email protected]

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Sickle cell anemia trial halted because of early success
Display Headline
Sickle cell anemia trial halted because of early success
Legacy Keywords
NIH, NHLBI, TCD, TWiTCH, sickle cell, children, transcranial Doppler, stroke, hydroxyurea, blood transfusions
Legacy Keywords
NIH, NHLBI, TCD, TWiTCH, sickle cell, children, transcranial Doppler, stroke, hydroxyurea, blood transfusions
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

New and Noteworthy Information—December 2014

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
New and Noteworthy Information—December 2014

Two-year folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation did not improve performance in four cognitive domains in elderly people with elevated homocysteine levels, according to a study published online ahead of print November 12 in Neurology. A total of 2,919 participants with an average age of 74 took either a tablet with 400 μg of folic acid and 500 μg of vitamin B12, or a placebo every day for two years. Tests of memory and thinking skills were performed at the beginning and end of the study. All participants had high blood levels of homocysteine. “While the homocysteine levels decreased by more in the group taking the B vitamins than in the group taking the placebo, unfortunately, there was no difference between the two groups in the scores on the thinking and memory tests,” the researchers stated.

Among more than 43,000 children treated in 25 emergency departments for blunt head trauma, traumatic brain injury (TBI) was identified on CT scans in 7% of the patients, according to a study published November 13 in the New England Journal of Medicine. In children 12 and younger, falls were the most common cause of head injury—among those younger than 2, falls accounted for 77% of head injuries, and in those 2 to 12, falls accounted for 38% of injuries. In children ages 13 to 17, 24% of injuries were due to assault, 19% were sports-related, and 18% resulted from motor vehicle accidents. Among all cases, 98% had mild head trauma. During diagnosis and treatment, cranial CT scans were performed on 37% of the children, “many arguably unnecessarily,” according to the researchers.

Preadmission use of COX-2 inhibitors was associated with increased 30-day mortality after ischemic stroke, but not hemorrhagic stroke, according to a study published online ahead of print November 5 in Neurology. Researchers analyzed records of 100,243 patients hospitalized for a first stroke between 2004 and 2012 and deaths within one month after the stroke. The investigators examined whether participants were current, former, or nonusers of these drugs within two months of the stroke. Overall, people who were current users of COX-2 inhibitors were 19% more likely to die after stroke than were people who did not take the drugs. New users of the older COX-2 drugs were 42% more likely to die from stroke than were those who were not taking the drugs.

Once-daily, low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, nonfatal stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction among patients age 60 or older with atherosclerotic risk factors, according to a study published online ahead of print November 17 in JAMA. This study included 14,464 Japanese patients with hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes mellitus who were randomized to aspirin (100 mg/d) or no aspirin in addition to ongoing medications. The researchers found no statistically significant difference between the two groups in time to the primary end point. The cumulative primary event rate was similar in participants in the aspirin group (2.77%) and those in the no-aspirin group (2.96%) five years after randomization. Aspirin significantly reduced the incidence of nonfatal heart attack and transient ischemic attack, and significantly increased the risk of extracranial hemorrhage requiring transfusion or hospitalization.

Overall symptom burden is the only independent predictor of prolonged symptoms after sport-related concussion, investigators reported online ahead of print November 7 in Neurology. The researchers conducted a prospective cohort study of 531 patients in a sports concussion clinic. Participants completed questionnaires that included the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS). Patients ranged in age from 7 to 26 (mean age, 14.6). The mean PCSS score at the initial visit was 26, and mean time to presentation was 12 days. Only total score on symptom inventory was independently associated with symptoms lasting longer than 28 days. No other potential predictor variables were independently associated with symptom duration or were useful in developing the optimal regression decision tree. Most participants with an initial PCSS score of less than 13 had resolution of their symptoms within 28 days of injury.

The ketogenic diet and modified Atkins diet show modest efficacy, although in some patients the effect is “remarkable” in the treatment of refractory epilepsy in adults, according to a study published online ahead of print October 29 in Neurology. Researchers reviewed five studies on the ketogenic diet that included 47 people and five studies on the modified Atkins diet that included 85 people. The investigators found that across all studies, 32% of people treated with the ketogenic diet and 29% of those treated with the modified Atkins diet had a 50% or better reduction in their seizures. Nine percent in the ketogenic treatment group and 5% in the modified Atkins group had a greater than 90% reduction in seizures. “These studies show the diets are moderately to very effective as another option for people with epilepsy,” stated the study authors.

 

 

The evaluation of serum micro-RNAs may help to identify the severity of brain injury and the risk of developing adverse effects after traumatic brain injury (TBI), according to a study published November 7 in PLoS One. Researchers identified a unique and specific group of microRNAs, which were detected in blood immediately after injury to the brain in mice. The results suggest that the microRNAs can be measured in the blood as proxies for mild TBI. The microRNA panel identified in this study is unique and does not overlap with blood microRNAs of post-traumatic stress disorder, as previously reported. “This important finding is a step forward in identifying objective biomarkers for mild TBI that may be further validated to accurately and cost effectively identify mild TBI in service members and civilians with brain injuries,” said the investigators.

The FDA has approved Lemtrada (alemtuzumab) for the treatment of patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). The approval comes nearly one year after the FDA declined to approve the drug, citing a lack of well-controlled data from clinical studies at the time indicating that the benefits had outweighed the risks. After an appeal by Genzyme (Cambridge, Massachusetts) and a new review by the FDA, the agency approved the drug based on two pivotal, randomized phase III, open-label, rater-blinded studies, comparing treatment with Lemtrada to interferon beta-1a, in patients with relapsing-remitting MS who were either new to treatment (CARE-MS I) or who had relapsed while on prior therapy (CARE-MS II). Lemtrada is recommended for patients who have had an inadequate response to two or more drugs indicated for the treatment of MS.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) exhibited a dose-dependent inverse association with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), according to a study published online ahead of print November 10 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers included 729 patients diagnosed with ALS between January 2002 and December 2008. The patients were compared with 14,580 controls. Fifteen percent of patients with ALS reported ACEI use between two and five years before their ALS diagnosis, and 18% of the control group without ALS reported ACEI use. When compared with patients who did not use ACEIs, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.83 for the group prescribed ACEIs lower than 449.5 of the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) and 0.43 cDDD for the group with a cumulative ACEI use of greater than 449.5 cDDD.

Patients treated at hospitals with higher volumes of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) cases have lower in-hospital mortality, independent of patient and hospital characteristics, according to a study published in the November Neurosurgery. In a large nationwide registry, researchers identified nearly 32,000 patients with SAH treated at 685 United States hospitals between 2003 and 2012. The median annual case volume per hospital was 8.5 patients. Mean in-hospital mortality was 25.7% but was lower with increasing annual SAH volume. Hospital SAH volume was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79 for quartile 4 vs quartile 1), independent of patient and other hospital characteristics. “Our results may have significant implications for regional stroke policies and procedures and affirm the recent recommendations that patients with SAH be treated at high-volume centers,” said study authors.

The use of a specialized ambulance—stroke emergency mobile unit (STEMO)—increases the percentage of patients receiving thrombolysis within 60 minutes, according to a study published online ahead of print November 17 in JAMA Neurology. A total of 3,213 emergency calls for suspected stroke occurred during weeks when STEMO was available, and 2,969 calls occurred during control weeks when STEMO was not available. Two hundred of 614 patients with stroke (32.6%) received thrombolysis when the STEMO was deployed, and 330 of 1,497 patients (22%) received thrombolysis in conventional care. Median onset to treatment was 24.5 minutes shorter after STEMO deployment, compared with conventional care. In all ischemic strokes, the rate of “golden hour” thrombolysis increased from 16 of the 1,497 patients (1.1%) during conventional care to 62 of 614 (10.1%) after STEMO deployment. Overall, golden hour thrombolysis entails no risk to the patients’ safety and is associated with better short-term outcomes, according to the researchers.

Granger causality (GC) analysis of intracranial EEG (iEEG) has the potential to increase understanding of preictal network activity and help improve surgical outcomes in cases of otherwise ambiguous iEEG onset, according to a study published online ahead of print November 4 in Epilepsia. In 10 retrospective and two prospective patients with epilepsy, iEEG was recorded at 500 or 1,000 Hz, using as many as 128 surface and depth electrodes. In all patients, the researchers found significant, widespread preictal GC network activity at peak frequencies from 80 to 250 Hz, beginning two to 42 seconds before visible electrographic onset. In the two prospective patients, GC source/sink comparisons supported the exclusion of early ictal regions that were not the dominant causal sources and contributed to planning of more limited surgical resections. Both groups of patients had a class 1 outcome at one year.

 

 

Tiny silent acute infarcts may be a cause of leukoaraiosis, a finding that points toward a potentially treatable form of dementia, investigators reported online ahead of print October 4 in Annals of Neurology. The study involved five patients with leukoaraiosis who underwent detailed MRI scanning of their brains every week for 16 consecutive weeks. The MRI scans revealed new tiny spots arising de novo in the cerebral white matter. The lesions were “clinically silent and had the signature features of acute ischemic stroke, according to the researchers. “With time, the characteristics of these lesions approached those of pre-existing leukoaraiosis,” the study authors stated.

Kimberly D. Williams

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 22(12)
Publications
Page Number
6-7
Legacy Keywords
Kimberly D. Williams, TBI, dementia, stoke, concussion, epilepsy, MS, ALS
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Two-year folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation did not improve performance in four cognitive domains in elderly people with elevated homocysteine levels, according to a study published online ahead of print November 12 in Neurology. A total of 2,919 participants with an average age of 74 took either a tablet with 400 μg of folic acid and 500 μg of vitamin B12, or a placebo every day for two years. Tests of memory and thinking skills were performed at the beginning and end of the study. All participants had high blood levels of homocysteine. “While the homocysteine levels decreased by more in the group taking the B vitamins than in the group taking the placebo, unfortunately, there was no difference between the two groups in the scores on the thinking and memory tests,” the researchers stated.

Among more than 43,000 children treated in 25 emergency departments for blunt head trauma, traumatic brain injury (TBI) was identified on CT scans in 7% of the patients, according to a study published November 13 in the New England Journal of Medicine. In children 12 and younger, falls were the most common cause of head injury—among those younger than 2, falls accounted for 77% of head injuries, and in those 2 to 12, falls accounted for 38% of injuries. In children ages 13 to 17, 24% of injuries were due to assault, 19% were sports-related, and 18% resulted from motor vehicle accidents. Among all cases, 98% had mild head trauma. During diagnosis and treatment, cranial CT scans were performed on 37% of the children, “many arguably unnecessarily,” according to the researchers.

Preadmission use of COX-2 inhibitors was associated with increased 30-day mortality after ischemic stroke, but not hemorrhagic stroke, according to a study published online ahead of print November 5 in Neurology. Researchers analyzed records of 100,243 patients hospitalized for a first stroke between 2004 and 2012 and deaths within one month after the stroke. The investigators examined whether participants were current, former, or nonusers of these drugs within two months of the stroke. Overall, people who were current users of COX-2 inhibitors were 19% more likely to die after stroke than were people who did not take the drugs. New users of the older COX-2 drugs were 42% more likely to die from stroke than were those who were not taking the drugs.

Once-daily, low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, nonfatal stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction among patients age 60 or older with atherosclerotic risk factors, according to a study published online ahead of print November 17 in JAMA. This study included 14,464 Japanese patients with hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes mellitus who were randomized to aspirin (100 mg/d) or no aspirin in addition to ongoing medications. The researchers found no statistically significant difference between the two groups in time to the primary end point. The cumulative primary event rate was similar in participants in the aspirin group (2.77%) and those in the no-aspirin group (2.96%) five years after randomization. Aspirin significantly reduced the incidence of nonfatal heart attack and transient ischemic attack, and significantly increased the risk of extracranial hemorrhage requiring transfusion or hospitalization.

Overall symptom burden is the only independent predictor of prolonged symptoms after sport-related concussion, investigators reported online ahead of print November 7 in Neurology. The researchers conducted a prospective cohort study of 531 patients in a sports concussion clinic. Participants completed questionnaires that included the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS). Patients ranged in age from 7 to 26 (mean age, 14.6). The mean PCSS score at the initial visit was 26, and mean time to presentation was 12 days. Only total score on symptom inventory was independently associated with symptoms lasting longer than 28 days. No other potential predictor variables were independently associated with symptom duration or were useful in developing the optimal regression decision tree. Most participants with an initial PCSS score of less than 13 had resolution of their symptoms within 28 days of injury.

The ketogenic diet and modified Atkins diet show modest efficacy, although in some patients the effect is “remarkable” in the treatment of refractory epilepsy in adults, according to a study published online ahead of print October 29 in Neurology. Researchers reviewed five studies on the ketogenic diet that included 47 people and five studies on the modified Atkins diet that included 85 people. The investigators found that across all studies, 32% of people treated with the ketogenic diet and 29% of those treated with the modified Atkins diet had a 50% or better reduction in their seizures. Nine percent in the ketogenic treatment group and 5% in the modified Atkins group had a greater than 90% reduction in seizures. “These studies show the diets are moderately to very effective as another option for people with epilepsy,” stated the study authors.

 

 

The evaluation of serum micro-RNAs may help to identify the severity of brain injury and the risk of developing adverse effects after traumatic brain injury (TBI), according to a study published November 7 in PLoS One. Researchers identified a unique and specific group of microRNAs, which were detected in blood immediately after injury to the brain in mice. The results suggest that the microRNAs can be measured in the blood as proxies for mild TBI. The microRNA panel identified in this study is unique and does not overlap with blood microRNAs of post-traumatic stress disorder, as previously reported. “This important finding is a step forward in identifying objective biomarkers for mild TBI that may be further validated to accurately and cost effectively identify mild TBI in service members and civilians with brain injuries,” said the investigators.

The FDA has approved Lemtrada (alemtuzumab) for the treatment of patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). The approval comes nearly one year after the FDA declined to approve the drug, citing a lack of well-controlled data from clinical studies at the time indicating that the benefits had outweighed the risks. After an appeal by Genzyme (Cambridge, Massachusetts) and a new review by the FDA, the agency approved the drug based on two pivotal, randomized phase III, open-label, rater-blinded studies, comparing treatment with Lemtrada to interferon beta-1a, in patients with relapsing-remitting MS who were either new to treatment (CARE-MS I) or who had relapsed while on prior therapy (CARE-MS II). Lemtrada is recommended for patients who have had an inadequate response to two or more drugs indicated for the treatment of MS.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) exhibited a dose-dependent inverse association with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), according to a study published online ahead of print November 10 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers included 729 patients diagnosed with ALS between January 2002 and December 2008. The patients were compared with 14,580 controls. Fifteen percent of patients with ALS reported ACEI use between two and five years before their ALS diagnosis, and 18% of the control group without ALS reported ACEI use. When compared with patients who did not use ACEIs, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.83 for the group prescribed ACEIs lower than 449.5 of the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) and 0.43 cDDD for the group with a cumulative ACEI use of greater than 449.5 cDDD.

Patients treated at hospitals with higher volumes of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) cases have lower in-hospital mortality, independent of patient and hospital characteristics, according to a study published in the November Neurosurgery. In a large nationwide registry, researchers identified nearly 32,000 patients with SAH treated at 685 United States hospitals between 2003 and 2012. The median annual case volume per hospital was 8.5 patients. Mean in-hospital mortality was 25.7% but was lower with increasing annual SAH volume. Hospital SAH volume was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79 for quartile 4 vs quartile 1), independent of patient and other hospital characteristics. “Our results may have significant implications for regional stroke policies and procedures and affirm the recent recommendations that patients with SAH be treated at high-volume centers,” said study authors.

The use of a specialized ambulance—stroke emergency mobile unit (STEMO)—increases the percentage of patients receiving thrombolysis within 60 minutes, according to a study published online ahead of print November 17 in JAMA Neurology. A total of 3,213 emergency calls for suspected stroke occurred during weeks when STEMO was available, and 2,969 calls occurred during control weeks when STEMO was not available. Two hundred of 614 patients with stroke (32.6%) received thrombolysis when the STEMO was deployed, and 330 of 1,497 patients (22%) received thrombolysis in conventional care. Median onset to treatment was 24.5 minutes shorter after STEMO deployment, compared with conventional care. In all ischemic strokes, the rate of “golden hour” thrombolysis increased from 16 of the 1,497 patients (1.1%) during conventional care to 62 of 614 (10.1%) after STEMO deployment. Overall, golden hour thrombolysis entails no risk to the patients’ safety and is associated with better short-term outcomes, according to the researchers.

Granger causality (GC) analysis of intracranial EEG (iEEG) has the potential to increase understanding of preictal network activity and help improve surgical outcomes in cases of otherwise ambiguous iEEG onset, according to a study published online ahead of print November 4 in Epilepsia. In 10 retrospective and two prospective patients with epilepsy, iEEG was recorded at 500 or 1,000 Hz, using as many as 128 surface and depth electrodes. In all patients, the researchers found significant, widespread preictal GC network activity at peak frequencies from 80 to 250 Hz, beginning two to 42 seconds before visible electrographic onset. In the two prospective patients, GC source/sink comparisons supported the exclusion of early ictal regions that were not the dominant causal sources and contributed to planning of more limited surgical resections. Both groups of patients had a class 1 outcome at one year.

 

 

Tiny silent acute infarcts may be a cause of leukoaraiosis, a finding that points toward a potentially treatable form of dementia, investigators reported online ahead of print October 4 in Annals of Neurology. The study involved five patients with leukoaraiosis who underwent detailed MRI scanning of their brains every week for 16 consecutive weeks. The MRI scans revealed new tiny spots arising de novo in the cerebral white matter. The lesions were “clinically silent and had the signature features of acute ischemic stroke, according to the researchers. “With time, the characteristics of these lesions approached those of pre-existing leukoaraiosis,” the study authors stated.

Kimberly D. Williams

Two-year folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation did not improve performance in four cognitive domains in elderly people with elevated homocysteine levels, according to a study published online ahead of print November 12 in Neurology. A total of 2,919 participants with an average age of 74 took either a tablet with 400 μg of folic acid and 500 μg of vitamin B12, or a placebo every day for two years. Tests of memory and thinking skills were performed at the beginning and end of the study. All participants had high blood levels of homocysteine. “While the homocysteine levels decreased by more in the group taking the B vitamins than in the group taking the placebo, unfortunately, there was no difference between the two groups in the scores on the thinking and memory tests,” the researchers stated.

Among more than 43,000 children treated in 25 emergency departments for blunt head trauma, traumatic brain injury (TBI) was identified on CT scans in 7% of the patients, according to a study published November 13 in the New England Journal of Medicine. In children 12 and younger, falls were the most common cause of head injury—among those younger than 2, falls accounted for 77% of head injuries, and in those 2 to 12, falls accounted for 38% of injuries. In children ages 13 to 17, 24% of injuries were due to assault, 19% were sports-related, and 18% resulted from motor vehicle accidents. Among all cases, 98% had mild head trauma. During diagnosis and treatment, cranial CT scans were performed on 37% of the children, “many arguably unnecessarily,” according to the researchers.

Preadmission use of COX-2 inhibitors was associated with increased 30-day mortality after ischemic stroke, but not hemorrhagic stroke, according to a study published online ahead of print November 5 in Neurology. Researchers analyzed records of 100,243 patients hospitalized for a first stroke between 2004 and 2012 and deaths within one month after the stroke. The investigators examined whether participants were current, former, or nonusers of these drugs within two months of the stroke. Overall, people who were current users of COX-2 inhibitors were 19% more likely to die after stroke than were people who did not take the drugs. New users of the older COX-2 drugs were 42% more likely to die from stroke than were those who were not taking the drugs.

Once-daily, low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, nonfatal stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction among patients age 60 or older with atherosclerotic risk factors, according to a study published online ahead of print November 17 in JAMA. This study included 14,464 Japanese patients with hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes mellitus who were randomized to aspirin (100 mg/d) or no aspirin in addition to ongoing medications. The researchers found no statistically significant difference between the two groups in time to the primary end point. The cumulative primary event rate was similar in participants in the aspirin group (2.77%) and those in the no-aspirin group (2.96%) five years after randomization. Aspirin significantly reduced the incidence of nonfatal heart attack and transient ischemic attack, and significantly increased the risk of extracranial hemorrhage requiring transfusion or hospitalization.

Overall symptom burden is the only independent predictor of prolonged symptoms after sport-related concussion, investigators reported online ahead of print November 7 in Neurology. The researchers conducted a prospective cohort study of 531 patients in a sports concussion clinic. Participants completed questionnaires that included the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS). Patients ranged in age from 7 to 26 (mean age, 14.6). The mean PCSS score at the initial visit was 26, and mean time to presentation was 12 days. Only total score on symptom inventory was independently associated with symptoms lasting longer than 28 days. No other potential predictor variables were independently associated with symptom duration or were useful in developing the optimal regression decision tree. Most participants with an initial PCSS score of less than 13 had resolution of their symptoms within 28 days of injury.

The ketogenic diet and modified Atkins diet show modest efficacy, although in some patients the effect is “remarkable” in the treatment of refractory epilepsy in adults, according to a study published online ahead of print October 29 in Neurology. Researchers reviewed five studies on the ketogenic diet that included 47 people and five studies on the modified Atkins diet that included 85 people. The investigators found that across all studies, 32% of people treated with the ketogenic diet and 29% of those treated with the modified Atkins diet had a 50% or better reduction in their seizures. Nine percent in the ketogenic treatment group and 5% in the modified Atkins group had a greater than 90% reduction in seizures. “These studies show the diets are moderately to very effective as another option for people with epilepsy,” stated the study authors.

 

 

The evaluation of serum micro-RNAs may help to identify the severity of brain injury and the risk of developing adverse effects after traumatic brain injury (TBI), according to a study published November 7 in PLoS One. Researchers identified a unique and specific group of microRNAs, which were detected in blood immediately after injury to the brain in mice. The results suggest that the microRNAs can be measured in the blood as proxies for mild TBI. The microRNA panel identified in this study is unique and does not overlap with blood microRNAs of post-traumatic stress disorder, as previously reported. “This important finding is a step forward in identifying objective biomarkers for mild TBI that may be further validated to accurately and cost effectively identify mild TBI in service members and civilians with brain injuries,” said the investigators.

The FDA has approved Lemtrada (alemtuzumab) for the treatment of patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). The approval comes nearly one year after the FDA declined to approve the drug, citing a lack of well-controlled data from clinical studies at the time indicating that the benefits had outweighed the risks. After an appeal by Genzyme (Cambridge, Massachusetts) and a new review by the FDA, the agency approved the drug based on two pivotal, randomized phase III, open-label, rater-blinded studies, comparing treatment with Lemtrada to interferon beta-1a, in patients with relapsing-remitting MS who were either new to treatment (CARE-MS I) or who had relapsed while on prior therapy (CARE-MS II). Lemtrada is recommended for patients who have had an inadequate response to two or more drugs indicated for the treatment of MS.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) exhibited a dose-dependent inverse association with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), according to a study published online ahead of print November 10 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers included 729 patients diagnosed with ALS between January 2002 and December 2008. The patients were compared with 14,580 controls. Fifteen percent of patients with ALS reported ACEI use between two and five years before their ALS diagnosis, and 18% of the control group without ALS reported ACEI use. When compared with patients who did not use ACEIs, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.83 for the group prescribed ACEIs lower than 449.5 of the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) and 0.43 cDDD for the group with a cumulative ACEI use of greater than 449.5 cDDD.

Patients treated at hospitals with higher volumes of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) cases have lower in-hospital mortality, independent of patient and hospital characteristics, according to a study published in the November Neurosurgery. In a large nationwide registry, researchers identified nearly 32,000 patients with SAH treated at 685 United States hospitals between 2003 and 2012. The median annual case volume per hospital was 8.5 patients. Mean in-hospital mortality was 25.7% but was lower with increasing annual SAH volume. Hospital SAH volume was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79 for quartile 4 vs quartile 1), independent of patient and other hospital characteristics. “Our results may have significant implications for regional stroke policies and procedures and affirm the recent recommendations that patients with SAH be treated at high-volume centers,” said study authors.

The use of a specialized ambulance—stroke emergency mobile unit (STEMO)—increases the percentage of patients receiving thrombolysis within 60 minutes, according to a study published online ahead of print November 17 in JAMA Neurology. A total of 3,213 emergency calls for suspected stroke occurred during weeks when STEMO was available, and 2,969 calls occurred during control weeks when STEMO was not available. Two hundred of 614 patients with stroke (32.6%) received thrombolysis when the STEMO was deployed, and 330 of 1,497 patients (22%) received thrombolysis in conventional care. Median onset to treatment was 24.5 minutes shorter after STEMO deployment, compared with conventional care. In all ischemic strokes, the rate of “golden hour” thrombolysis increased from 16 of the 1,497 patients (1.1%) during conventional care to 62 of 614 (10.1%) after STEMO deployment. Overall, golden hour thrombolysis entails no risk to the patients’ safety and is associated with better short-term outcomes, according to the researchers.

Granger causality (GC) analysis of intracranial EEG (iEEG) has the potential to increase understanding of preictal network activity and help improve surgical outcomes in cases of otherwise ambiguous iEEG onset, according to a study published online ahead of print November 4 in Epilepsia. In 10 retrospective and two prospective patients with epilepsy, iEEG was recorded at 500 or 1,000 Hz, using as many as 128 surface and depth electrodes. In all patients, the researchers found significant, widespread preictal GC network activity at peak frequencies from 80 to 250 Hz, beginning two to 42 seconds before visible electrographic onset. In the two prospective patients, GC source/sink comparisons supported the exclusion of early ictal regions that were not the dominant causal sources and contributed to planning of more limited surgical resections. Both groups of patients had a class 1 outcome at one year.

 

 

Tiny silent acute infarcts may be a cause of leukoaraiosis, a finding that points toward a potentially treatable form of dementia, investigators reported online ahead of print October 4 in Annals of Neurology. The study involved five patients with leukoaraiosis who underwent detailed MRI scanning of their brains every week for 16 consecutive weeks. The MRI scans revealed new tiny spots arising de novo in the cerebral white matter. The lesions were “clinically silent and had the signature features of acute ischemic stroke, according to the researchers. “With time, the characteristics of these lesions approached those of pre-existing leukoaraiosis,” the study authors stated.

Kimberly D. Williams

References

References

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 22(12)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 22(12)
Page Number
6-7
Page Number
6-7
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
New and Noteworthy Information—December 2014
Display Headline
New and Noteworthy Information—December 2014
Legacy Keywords
Kimberly D. Williams, TBI, dementia, stoke, concussion, epilepsy, MS, ALS
Legacy Keywords
Kimberly D. Williams, TBI, dementia, stoke, concussion, epilepsy, MS, ALS
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article