User login
Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Preferences
The 2012 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy conducted a systematic review focusing on patient values and preferences regarding antithrombotic therapy, including thromboprophylaxis.[1] They found that patient values and preferences are highly variable and should be considered when developing future clinical practice guidelines. Notably, there were no studies evaluating patient preferences for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, which is prescribed for the vast majority of hospitalized patients.
Historically, interventions to prevent VTE have focused on increasing prescriptions of prophylaxis. At the Johns Hopkins Hospital, we implemented a mandatory clinical decision support tool in our computerized provider order entry system.[2] Following implementation of this tool, prescription of risk‐appropriate VTE prophylaxis dramatically increased for both medical and surgical patients.[3, 4, 5] These efforts were made with the implicit and incorrect assumption that prescribed medication doses will always be administered to patients, when in fact patient refusal is a leading cause of nonadministration. Studies of VTE prophylaxis administration have reported that 10% to 12% of doses are not administered to patients.[6] Alarmingly, it has been reported that among medically ill patients, between 10% and 30% of doses are not administered, with patient refusal as the most frequently documented reason.
The purpose of this study was to assess patient preferences regarding pharmacological VTE prophylaxis.
METHODS
Study Design
A sample of consecutive hospitalized patients on select medicine and surgical floors previously identified as low‐ and high‐performing units at our institution in regard to administration rates of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was assembled from a daily electronic report of patients prescribed pharmacological VTE prophylaxis (Allscripts Sunrise, Chicago, IL) from December 2012 to March 2013. These units were identified in a study conducted at our institution as the lowest‐ and highest‐performing units in regard to incidence of administration of ordered pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. From this data analysis, we chose the 2 lowest‐performing and 2 highest‐performing units on the medical and surgical service. To be eligible for this study, patients had to have an active order for 1 of the following VTE prophylaxis regimens: unfractionated heparin 5000 units or 7500 units administered subcutaneously every 8 or 12 hours, enoxaparin 30 mg administered subcutaneously every 12 hours or 40 mg administered subcutaneously every 24 hours. Participants had to be at least 18 years of age and hospitalized for at least 2 days on their respective units. Patients who were nonEnglish speaking, those previously enrolled in this study, or those unable to provide consent were excluded from the study.
Data Collection
Demographic information was collected, including patient‐reported education level. To determine their preference for VTE prophylaxis, patients were provided a survey, which included being asked, Would you prefer a pill or a shot to prevent blood clots, if they both worked equally well. The survey was created by the study team to collect information from patients regarding their baseline knowledge of VTE and preference regarding pharmacologic prophylaxis. Additional data included the patient's education level to determine potential association with preference. The survey was verbally administered by 1 investigator (A.W.) to all patients. Patients were asked to explain their rationale for their stated preference in regard to VTE prophylaxis. Patient rationale was subsequently coded to allow for uniformity among patient responses based on patterns in responses. Our electronic medication record allows us to identify patients who refused their medication through nursing documentation. Patients with documented refusal of ordered pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis were asked about the rationale for their refusal. This study was approved by the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board.
Statistical Analysis
Quantitative data from the surveys were analyzed using Minitab (Minitab Inc., State College, PA). A [2] test analysis was performed for categorical data, as appropriate. A P value 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
RESULTS
Quantitative Results
We interviewed patients regarding their preferred route of administration of VTE prophylaxis. Overall, 339 patients were screened for this study. Sixty patients were not eligible to participate. Forty‐seven were unable to provide consent, and 13 were nonEnglish speaking. Of the 269 remaining eligible patients, 227 (84.4%) consented to participate.
Baseline demographics of the participants are presented in Table 1, categorized on the basis of their preferred route of administration for VTE prophylaxis. A majority of patients indicated a preference for an oral formulation of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. There was no association between education level or service type on preference. Preference for an oral formulation was largely influenced by patient‐reported pain and bruising associated with subcutaneous administration (Table 2). A substantial majority of patients reporting a preference for a subcutaneous formulation and emphasized a belief that this route was associated with a faster onset of action. Among patients who preferred an oral formulation (n=137), 71 patients (51.8%) were documented as having refused at least 1 dose of ordered VTE prophylaxis. Patients who preferred a subcutaneous route of VTE prophylaxis were less likely to refuse prophylaxis, with only 22 patients (35.5%) having a documented refusal of at least 1 dose (P0.0001).
| Enteral, n=137 | Parenteral, n=62 | No Preference, n=28 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Age, y, mean ( SD) | 49.5 (14.7) | 51.7 (16.1) | 48.9 (14.6) |
| Male, n (%) | 74 (54.0) | 38 (61.3) | 15 (53.6) |
| Race n (%) | |||
| Caucasian | 81 (59.1) | 31 (50.0) | 14 (50.0) |
| African American | 50 (36.5) | 28 (45.2) | 14 (50.0) |
| Education level, n (%) | |||
| High school or less | 46 (33.6) | 27 (43.5) | 14 (50.0) |
| College | 68 (49.6) | 21 (33.9) | 9 (32.1) |
| Advanced degree | 10 (7.3) | 8 (12.9) | 2 (7.1) |
| Unable to obtain | 13 (9.5) | 6 (9.7) | 3 (10.8) |
| Past history of VTE, n (%) | 12 (8.8) | 9 (14.5) | 2 (7.1) |
| Type of unit, n (%) | |||
| Medical | 59 (43.1) | 24 (38.7) | 17 (60.7) |
| Surgical | 78 (56.9) | 38 (61.3) | 11 (39.3) |
| Documented refusal of ordered prophylaxis, n (%) | 71 (51.8) | 20 (32.3) | 9 (32.1) |
| Length of hospital stay prior to inclusion in study, d, median (IQR) | 4.0 (3.07.0) | 3.0 (3.05.0) | 4.0 (2.05.0) |
| Patients preferring enteral route, n (%) | 137 (60.4) |
| Dislike of needles | 41 (30.0) |
| Pain from injection | 38 (27.7) |
| Ease of use | 18 (13.1) |
| Bruising from injection | 9 (6.6) |
| Other/no rationale | 31 (22.6) |
| Patients preferring injection route, n (%) | 62 (27.5) |
| Faster onset of action | 25 (40.3) |
| Pill burden | 11 (17.7) |
| Ease of use | 9 (14.5) |
| Other/no rationale | 17 (27.5) |
| Patients with no preference, n (%) | 28 (12.4) |
DISCUSSION
Using a mixed‐methods approach, we report the first survey evaluating patient preferences regarding pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. We found that a majority of patients preferred an oral route of administration. Nevertheless, a substantial number of patients favored a subcutaneous route of administration believing it to be associated with a faster onset of action. Of interest, patients favoring subcutaneous injections were significantly less likely to refuse doses of ordered VTE prophylaxis. Given that all patients were prescribed a subcutaneous form of VTE prophylaxis, matching patient preference to VTE prophylaxis prescription could potentially increase adherence and reduce patient refusal of ordered prophylaxis. Considering the large number of patients who preferred an oral route of administration, the availability of an oral formulation may potentially result in improved adherence to inpatient VTE prophylaxis.
Our findings have significant implications for healthcare providers, and for patient safety and quality‐improvement researchers. VTE prophylaxis is an important patient‐safety practice, particularly for medically ill patients, which is believed to be underprescribed.[7] Recent studies have demonstrated that a significant number of doses of VTE prophylaxis are not administered, primarily due to patient refusal.[6] Our data indicate that tailoring the route of prophylaxis administration to patient preference may represent a feasible strategy to improve VTE prophylaxis administration rates. Recently, several target‐specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) have been approved for a variety of clinical indications, and all have been investigated for VTE prophylaxis.[7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15] However, no agent is currently US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved for primary prevention of VTE, although apixaban and rivaroxaban are FDA approved for VTE prevention in joint replacement.[13, 14] Although in some instances these TSOACs were noted to demonstrate only equivalent efficacy to standard subcutaneous forms of VTE prophylaxis, our data suggest that perhaps in some patients, use of these agents may result in better outcomes due to improved adherence to therapy due to a preferred oral route of administration. We think this hypothesis warrants further investigation.
Our study also underscores the importance of considering patient preferences when caring for patients as emphasized by the 2012 ACCP guidelines.[1] Our results indicate that consideration of patient preferences may lead to better patient care and better outcomes. Interestingly, there were no differences in preference based on education level or the type of service to which the patient was admitted. Clarification of uninformed opinions regarding the rationale for preference may also lead to more informed decisions by patients.
This study has a number of limitations. We only included patients on the internal medicine and general surgical services. It is possible that patients on other specialty services may have different opinions regarding prophylaxis that were not captured in our sample. Similarly, our sample size was limited, and approximately 15% of potential subjects did not participate. We do believe that our population is reflective of our institution based upon our previously published evaluation of multiple hospital units and the inclusion of low‐ and high‐performing units on both the medical and surgical services. Nevertheless, we believe that much more investigation of patient perspectives on VTE prophylaxis needs to be done to inform decision making, including the impact of patient preferences on VTE‐related outcomes. Additionally, we did not evaluate potential predictors of preference including admission diagnosis and duration of hospital length of stay.
In conclusion, we conducted a mixed‐methods analysis of patient preferences regarding pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. Matching patient preference to ordered VTE prophylaxis may increase adherence to ordered prophylaxis. In this era of increasingly patient‐centered healthcare and expanding options for VTE prophylaxis, we believe information on patient preferences will be helpful to tailoring options for prevention and treatment.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Disclosures: Dr. Haut is the primary investigator of the Mentored Clinician Scientist Development Award K08 1K08HS017952‐01 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality entitled Does Screening Variability Make DVT an Unreliable Quality Measure of Trauma Care? Dr. Haut receives royalties from Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins for a book he coauthored (Avoiding Common ICU Errors). He has received honoraria for various speaking engagements regarding clinical, quality, and safety topics and has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. Dr. Streiff has received research funding from Sanofi‐Aventis and Bristol‐Myers Squibb; honoraria for Continuing Medial Education lectures from Sanofi‐Aventis and Ortho‐McNeil; consulted for Sanofi‐Aventis, Eisai, Daiichi‐Sankyo, and Janssen HealthCare; and has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. Mr. Lau, Drs. Haut, Streiff, and Shermock are supported by a contract from the Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute titled Preventing Venous Thromboembolism: Empowering Patients and Enabling Patient‐Centered Care via Health Information Technology (CE‐12‐11‐4489). Ms. Hobson has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. All others have no relevant funding or conflicts of interest to report.
- , , , et al. Patient values and preferences in decision making for antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review. Chest. 2012;141(2):e1S–e23S.
- , , , et al. Lessons from the Johns Hopkins Multi‐Disciplinary Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prevention Collaborative. BMJ. 2012;344:e3935.
- , , , et al. Impact of a venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis “smart order set”: improved compliance, fewer events. Am J Hematol. 2013;88(7):545–549.
- , , , et al. Improved prophylaxis and decreased preventable harm with a mandatory computerized clinical decision support tool for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in trauma patients. Arch Surg. 2012;147(10):901–907.
- , , , , . Linking processes and outcomes: a key strategy to prevent and report harm from venous thromboembolism in surgical patients. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(3):299–300.
- , , , et al. Patterns of non‐administration of ordered doses of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: implications for intervention strategies. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66311.
- , , , et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross‐sectional study. Lancet. 2008;371:387–394.
- , , , et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2765–2775.
- , , , et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthoplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2776–2786.
- , , , , , . Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:594–604.
- , , , , , . Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement (ADVANCE‐2): a randomized double‐blind trial. Lancet. 2010;275:807–815.
- , , , et al. Rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty. Pooled analysis of four studies. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105:444–453.
- , , , et al. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2167–2177.
- , , , et al. Efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis with low‐molecular‐weight heparin or rivaroxaban in hip and knee replacement surgery: findings from the ORTHO‐TEP registry. Thromb Haemost. 2013;109:154–163.
- , , , et al. Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:513–523.
The 2012 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy conducted a systematic review focusing on patient values and preferences regarding antithrombotic therapy, including thromboprophylaxis.[1] They found that patient values and preferences are highly variable and should be considered when developing future clinical practice guidelines. Notably, there were no studies evaluating patient preferences for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, which is prescribed for the vast majority of hospitalized patients.
Historically, interventions to prevent VTE have focused on increasing prescriptions of prophylaxis. At the Johns Hopkins Hospital, we implemented a mandatory clinical decision support tool in our computerized provider order entry system.[2] Following implementation of this tool, prescription of risk‐appropriate VTE prophylaxis dramatically increased for both medical and surgical patients.[3, 4, 5] These efforts were made with the implicit and incorrect assumption that prescribed medication doses will always be administered to patients, when in fact patient refusal is a leading cause of nonadministration. Studies of VTE prophylaxis administration have reported that 10% to 12% of doses are not administered to patients.[6] Alarmingly, it has been reported that among medically ill patients, between 10% and 30% of doses are not administered, with patient refusal as the most frequently documented reason.
The purpose of this study was to assess patient preferences regarding pharmacological VTE prophylaxis.
METHODS
Study Design
A sample of consecutive hospitalized patients on select medicine and surgical floors previously identified as low‐ and high‐performing units at our institution in regard to administration rates of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was assembled from a daily electronic report of patients prescribed pharmacological VTE prophylaxis (Allscripts Sunrise, Chicago, IL) from December 2012 to March 2013. These units were identified in a study conducted at our institution as the lowest‐ and highest‐performing units in regard to incidence of administration of ordered pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. From this data analysis, we chose the 2 lowest‐performing and 2 highest‐performing units on the medical and surgical service. To be eligible for this study, patients had to have an active order for 1 of the following VTE prophylaxis regimens: unfractionated heparin 5000 units or 7500 units administered subcutaneously every 8 or 12 hours, enoxaparin 30 mg administered subcutaneously every 12 hours or 40 mg administered subcutaneously every 24 hours. Participants had to be at least 18 years of age and hospitalized for at least 2 days on their respective units. Patients who were nonEnglish speaking, those previously enrolled in this study, or those unable to provide consent were excluded from the study.
Data Collection
Demographic information was collected, including patient‐reported education level. To determine their preference for VTE prophylaxis, patients were provided a survey, which included being asked, Would you prefer a pill or a shot to prevent blood clots, if they both worked equally well. The survey was created by the study team to collect information from patients regarding their baseline knowledge of VTE and preference regarding pharmacologic prophylaxis. Additional data included the patient's education level to determine potential association with preference. The survey was verbally administered by 1 investigator (A.W.) to all patients. Patients were asked to explain their rationale for their stated preference in regard to VTE prophylaxis. Patient rationale was subsequently coded to allow for uniformity among patient responses based on patterns in responses. Our electronic medication record allows us to identify patients who refused their medication through nursing documentation. Patients with documented refusal of ordered pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis were asked about the rationale for their refusal. This study was approved by the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board.
Statistical Analysis
Quantitative data from the surveys were analyzed using Minitab (Minitab Inc., State College, PA). A [2] test analysis was performed for categorical data, as appropriate. A P value 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
RESULTS
Quantitative Results
We interviewed patients regarding their preferred route of administration of VTE prophylaxis. Overall, 339 patients were screened for this study. Sixty patients were not eligible to participate. Forty‐seven were unable to provide consent, and 13 were nonEnglish speaking. Of the 269 remaining eligible patients, 227 (84.4%) consented to participate.
Baseline demographics of the participants are presented in Table 1, categorized on the basis of their preferred route of administration for VTE prophylaxis. A majority of patients indicated a preference for an oral formulation of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. There was no association between education level or service type on preference. Preference for an oral formulation was largely influenced by patient‐reported pain and bruising associated with subcutaneous administration (Table 2). A substantial majority of patients reporting a preference for a subcutaneous formulation and emphasized a belief that this route was associated with a faster onset of action. Among patients who preferred an oral formulation (n=137), 71 patients (51.8%) were documented as having refused at least 1 dose of ordered VTE prophylaxis. Patients who preferred a subcutaneous route of VTE prophylaxis were less likely to refuse prophylaxis, with only 22 patients (35.5%) having a documented refusal of at least 1 dose (P0.0001).
| Enteral, n=137 | Parenteral, n=62 | No Preference, n=28 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Age, y, mean ( SD) | 49.5 (14.7) | 51.7 (16.1) | 48.9 (14.6) |
| Male, n (%) | 74 (54.0) | 38 (61.3) | 15 (53.6) |
| Race n (%) | |||
| Caucasian | 81 (59.1) | 31 (50.0) | 14 (50.0) |
| African American | 50 (36.5) | 28 (45.2) | 14 (50.0) |
| Education level, n (%) | |||
| High school or less | 46 (33.6) | 27 (43.5) | 14 (50.0) |
| College | 68 (49.6) | 21 (33.9) | 9 (32.1) |
| Advanced degree | 10 (7.3) | 8 (12.9) | 2 (7.1) |
| Unable to obtain | 13 (9.5) | 6 (9.7) | 3 (10.8) |
| Past history of VTE, n (%) | 12 (8.8) | 9 (14.5) | 2 (7.1) |
| Type of unit, n (%) | |||
| Medical | 59 (43.1) | 24 (38.7) | 17 (60.7) |
| Surgical | 78 (56.9) | 38 (61.3) | 11 (39.3) |
| Documented refusal of ordered prophylaxis, n (%) | 71 (51.8) | 20 (32.3) | 9 (32.1) |
| Length of hospital stay prior to inclusion in study, d, median (IQR) | 4.0 (3.07.0) | 3.0 (3.05.0) | 4.0 (2.05.0) |
| Patients preferring enteral route, n (%) | 137 (60.4) |
| Dislike of needles | 41 (30.0) |
| Pain from injection | 38 (27.7) |
| Ease of use | 18 (13.1) |
| Bruising from injection | 9 (6.6) |
| Other/no rationale | 31 (22.6) |
| Patients preferring injection route, n (%) | 62 (27.5) |
| Faster onset of action | 25 (40.3) |
| Pill burden | 11 (17.7) |
| Ease of use | 9 (14.5) |
| Other/no rationale | 17 (27.5) |
| Patients with no preference, n (%) | 28 (12.4) |
DISCUSSION
Using a mixed‐methods approach, we report the first survey evaluating patient preferences regarding pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. We found that a majority of patients preferred an oral route of administration. Nevertheless, a substantial number of patients favored a subcutaneous route of administration believing it to be associated with a faster onset of action. Of interest, patients favoring subcutaneous injections were significantly less likely to refuse doses of ordered VTE prophylaxis. Given that all patients were prescribed a subcutaneous form of VTE prophylaxis, matching patient preference to VTE prophylaxis prescription could potentially increase adherence and reduce patient refusal of ordered prophylaxis. Considering the large number of patients who preferred an oral route of administration, the availability of an oral formulation may potentially result in improved adherence to inpatient VTE prophylaxis.
Our findings have significant implications for healthcare providers, and for patient safety and quality‐improvement researchers. VTE prophylaxis is an important patient‐safety practice, particularly for medically ill patients, which is believed to be underprescribed.[7] Recent studies have demonstrated that a significant number of doses of VTE prophylaxis are not administered, primarily due to patient refusal.[6] Our data indicate that tailoring the route of prophylaxis administration to patient preference may represent a feasible strategy to improve VTE prophylaxis administration rates. Recently, several target‐specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) have been approved for a variety of clinical indications, and all have been investigated for VTE prophylaxis.[7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15] However, no agent is currently US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved for primary prevention of VTE, although apixaban and rivaroxaban are FDA approved for VTE prevention in joint replacement.[13, 14] Although in some instances these TSOACs were noted to demonstrate only equivalent efficacy to standard subcutaneous forms of VTE prophylaxis, our data suggest that perhaps in some patients, use of these agents may result in better outcomes due to improved adherence to therapy due to a preferred oral route of administration. We think this hypothesis warrants further investigation.
Our study also underscores the importance of considering patient preferences when caring for patients as emphasized by the 2012 ACCP guidelines.[1] Our results indicate that consideration of patient preferences may lead to better patient care and better outcomes. Interestingly, there were no differences in preference based on education level or the type of service to which the patient was admitted. Clarification of uninformed opinions regarding the rationale for preference may also lead to more informed decisions by patients.
This study has a number of limitations. We only included patients on the internal medicine and general surgical services. It is possible that patients on other specialty services may have different opinions regarding prophylaxis that were not captured in our sample. Similarly, our sample size was limited, and approximately 15% of potential subjects did not participate. We do believe that our population is reflective of our institution based upon our previously published evaluation of multiple hospital units and the inclusion of low‐ and high‐performing units on both the medical and surgical services. Nevertheless, we believe that much more investigation of patient perspectives on VTE prophylaxis needs to be done to inform decision making, including the impact of patient preferences on VTE‐related outcomes. Additionally, we did not evaluate potential predictors of preference including admission diagnosis and duration of hospital length of stay.
In conclusion, we conducted a mixed‐methods analysis of patient preferences regarding pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. Matching patient preference to ordered VTE prophylaxis may increase adherence to ordered prophylaxis. In this era of increasingly patient‐centered healthcare and expanding options for VTE prophylaxis, we believe information on patient preferences will be helpful to tailoring options for prevention and treatment.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Disclosures: Dr. Haut is the primary investigator of the Mentored Clinician Scientist Development Award K08 1K08HS017952‐01 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality entitled Does Screening Variability Make DVT an Unreliable Quality Measure of Trauma Care? Dr. Haut receives royalties from Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins for a book he coauthored (Avoiding Common ICU Errors). He has received honoraria for various speaking engagements regarding clinical, quality, and safety topics and has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. Dr. Streiff has received research funding from Sanofi‐Aventis and Bristol‐Myers Squibb; honoraria for Continuing Medial Education lectures from Sanofi‐Aventis and Ortho‐McNeil; consulted for Sanofi‐Aventis, Eisai, Daiichi‐Sankyo, and Janssen HealthCare; and has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. Mr. Lau, Drs. Haut, Streiff, and Shermock are supported by a contract from the Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute titled Preventing Venous Thromboembolism: Empowering Patients and Enabling Patient‐Centered Care via Health Information Technology (CE‐12‐11‐4489). Ms. Hobson has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. All others have no relevant funding or conflicts of interest to report.
The 2012 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy conducted a systematic review focusing on patient values and preferences regarding antithrombotic therapy, including thromboprophylaxis.[1] They found that patient values and preferences are highly variable and should be considered when developing future clinical practice guidelines. Notably, there were no studies evaluating patient preferences for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, which is prescribed for the vast majority of hospitalized patients.
Historically, interventions to prevent VTE have focused on increasing prescriptions of prophylaxis. At the Johns Hopkins Hospital, we implemented a mandatory clinical decision support tool in our computerized provider order entry system.[2] Following implementation of this tool, prescription of risk‐appropriate VTE prophylaxis dramatically increased for both medical and surgical patients.[3, 4, 5] These efforts were made with the implicit and incorrect assumption that prescribed medication doses will always be administered to patients, when in fact patient refusal is a leading cause of nonadministration. Studies of VTE prophylaxis administration have reported that 10% to 12% of doses are not administered to patients.[6] Alarmingly, it has been reported that among medically ill patients, between 10% and 30% of doses are not administered, with patient refusal as the most frequently documented reason.
The purpose of this study was to assess patient preferences regarding pharmacological VTE prophylaxis.
METHODS
Study Design
A sample of consecutive hospitalized patients on select medicine and surgical floors previously identified as low‐ and high‐performing units at our institution in regard to administration rates of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was assembled from a daily electronic report of patients prescribed pharmacological VTE prophylaxis (Allscripts Sunrise, Chicago, IL) from December 2012 to March 2013. These units were identified in a study conducted at our institution as the lowest‐ and highest‐performing units in regard to incidence of administration of ordered pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. From this data analysis, we chose the 2 lowest‐performing and 2 highest‐performing units on the medical and surgical service. To be eligible for this study, patients had to have an active order for 1 of the following VTE prophylaxis regimens: unfractionated heparin 5000 units or 7500 units administered subcutaneously every 8 or 12 hours, enoxaparin 30 mg administered subcutaneously every 12 hours or 40 mg administered subcutaneously every 24 hours. Participants had to be at least 18 years of age and hospitalized for at least 2 days on their respective units. Patients who were nonEnglish speaking, those previously enrolled in this study, or those unable to provide consent were excluded from the study.
Data Collection
Demographic information was collected, including patient‐reported education level. To determine their preference for VTE prophylaxis, patients were provided a survey, which included being asked, Would you prefer a pill or a shot to prevent blood clots, if they both worked equally well. The survey was created by the study team to collect information from patients regarding their baseline knowledge of VTE and preference regarding pharmacologic prophylaxis. Additional data included the patient's education level to determine potential association with preference. The survey was verbally administered by 1 investigator (A.W.) to all patients. Patients were asked to explain their rationale for their stated preference in regard to VTE prophylaxis. Patient rationale was subsequently coded to allow for uniformity among patient responses based on patterns in responses. Our electronic medication record allows us to identify patients who refused their medication through nursing documentation. Patients with documented refusal of ordered pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis were asked about the rationale for their refusal. This study was approved by the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board.
Statistical Analysis
Quantitative data from the surveys were analyzed using Minitab (Minitab Inc., State College, PA). A [2] test analysis was performed for categorical data, as appropriate. A P value 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
RESULTS
Quantitative Results
We interviewed patients regarding their preferred route of administration of VTE prophylaxis. Overall, 339 patients were screened for this study. Sixty patients were not eligible to participate. Forty‐seven were unable to provide consent, and 13 were nonEnglish speaking. Of the 269 remaining eligible patients, 227 (84.4%) consented to participate.
Baseline demographics of the participants are presented in Table 1, categorized on the basis of their preferred route of administration for VTE prophylaxis. A majority of patients indicated a preference for an oral formulation of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. There was no association between education level or service type on preference. Preference for an oral formulation was largely influenced by patient‐reported pain and bruising associated with subcutaneous administration (Table 2). A substantial majority of patients reporting a preference for a subcutaneous formulation and emphasized a belief that this route was associated with a faster onset of action. Among patients who preferred an oral formulation (n=137), 71 patients (51.8%) were documented as having refused at least 1 dose of ordered VTE prophylaxis. Patients who preferred a subcutaneous route of VTE prophylaxis were less likely to refuse prophylaxis, with only 22 patients (35.5%) having a documented refusal of at least 1 dose (P0.0001).
| Enteral, n=137 | Parenteral, n=62 | No Preference, n=28 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Age, y, mean ( SD) | 49.5 (14.7) | 51.7 (16.1) | 48.9 (14.6) |
| Male, n (%) | 74 (54.0) | 38 (61.3) | 15 (53.6) |
| Race n (%) | |||
| Caucasian | 81 (59.1) | 31 (50.0) | 14 (50.0) |
| African American | 50 (36.5) | 28 (45.2) | 14 (50.0) |
| Education level, n (%) | |||
| High school or less | 46 (33.6) | 27 (43.5) | 14 (50.0) |
| College | 68 (49.6) | 21 (33.9) | 9 (32.1) |
| Advanced degree | 10 (7.3) | 8 (12.9) | 2 (7.1) |
| Unable to obtain | 13 (9.5) | 6 (9.7) | 3 (10.8) |
| Past history of VTE, n (%) | 12 (8.8) | 9 (14.5) | 2 (7.1) |
| Type of unit, n (%) | |||
| Medical | 59 (43.1) | 24 (38.7) | 17 (60.7) |
| Surgical | 78 (56.9) | 38 (61.3) | 11 (39.3) |
| Documented refusal of ordered prophylaxis, n (%) | 71 (51.8) | 20 (32.3) | 9 (32.1) |
| Length of hospital stay prior to inclusion in study, d, median (IQR) | 4.0 (3.07.0) | 3.0 (3.05.0) | 4.0 (2.05.0) |
| Patients preferring enteral route, n (%) | 137 (60.4) |
| Dislike of needles | 41 (30.0) |
| Pain from injection | 38 (27.7) |
| Ease of use | 18 (13.1) |
| Bruising from injection | 9 (6.6) |
| Other/no rationale | 31 (22.6) |
| Patients preferring injection route, n (%) | 62 (27.5) |
| Faster onset of action | 25 (40.3) |
| Pill burden | 11 (17.7) |
| Ease of use | 9 (14.5) |
| Other/no rationale | 17 (27.5) |
| Patients with no preference, n (%) | 28 (12.4) |
DISCUSSION
Using a mixed‐methods approach, we report the first survey evaluating patient preferences regarding pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. We found that a majority of patients preferred an oral route of administration. Nevertheless, a substantial number of patients favored a subcutaneous route of administration believing it to be associated with a faster onset of action. Of interest, patients favoring subcutaneous injections were significantly less likely to refuse doses of ordered VTE prophylaxis. Given that all patients were prescribed a subcutaneous form of VTE prophylaxis, matching patient preference to VTE prophylaxis prescription could potentially increase adherence and reduce patient refusal of ordered prophylaxis. Considering the large number of patients who preferred an oral route of administration, the availability of an oral formulation may potentially result in improved adherence to inpatient VTE prophylaxis.
Our findings have significant implications for healthcare providers, and for patient safety and quality‐improvement researchers. VTE prophylaxis is an important patient‐safety practice, particularly for medically ill patients, which is believed to be underprescribed.[7] Recent studies have demonstrated that a significant number of doses of VTE prophylaxis are not administered, primarily due to patient refusal.[6] Our data indicate that tailoring the route of prophylaxis administration to patient preference may represent a feasible strategy to improve VTE prophylaxis administration rates. Recently, several target‐specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) have been approved for a variety of clinical indications, and all have been investigated for VTE prophylaxis.[7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15] However, no agent is currently US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved for primary prevention of VTE, although apixaban and rivaroxaban are FDA approved for VTE prevention in joint replacement.[13, 14] Although in some instances these TSOACs were noted to demonstrate only equivalent efficacy to standard subcutaneous forms of VTE prophylaxis, our data suggest that perhaps in some patients, use of these agents may result in better outcomes due to improved adherence to therapy due to a preferred oral route of administration. We think this hypothesis warrants further investigation.
Our study also underscores the importance of considering patient preferences when caring for patients as emphasized by the 2012 ACCP guidelines.[1] Our results indicate that consideration of patient preferences may lead to better patient care and better outcomes. Interestingly, there were no differences in preference based on education level or the type of service to which the patient was admitted. Clarification of uninformed opinions regarding the rationale for preference may also lead to more informed decisions by patients.
This study has a number of limitations. We only included patients on the internal medicine and general surgical services. It is possible that patients on other specialty services may have different opinions regarding prophylaxis that were not captured in our sample. Similarly, our sample size was limited, and approximately 15% of potential subjects did not participate. We do believe that our population is reflective of our institution based upon our previously published evaluation of multiple hospital units and the inclusion of low‐ and high‐performing units on both the medical and surgical services. Nevertheless, we believe that much more investigation of patient perspectives on VTE prophylaxis needs to be done to inform decision making, including the impact of patient preferences on VTE‐related outcomes. Additionally, we did not evaluate potential predictors of preference including admission diagnosis and duration of hospital length of stay.
In conclusion, we conducted a mixed‐methods analysis of patient preferences regarding pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. Matching patient preference to ordered VTE prophylaxis may increase adherence to ordered prophylaxis. In this era of increasingly patient‐centered healthcare and expanding options for VTE prophylaxis, we believe information on patient preferences will be helpful to tailoring options for prevention and treatment.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Disclosures: Dr. Haut is the primary investigator of the Mentored Clinician Scientist Development Award K08 1K08HS017952‐01 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality entitled Does Screening Variability Make DVT an Unreliable Quality Measure of Trauma Care? Dr. Haut receives royalties from Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins for a book he coauthored (Avoiding Common ICU Errors). He has received honoraria for various speaking engagements regarding clinical, quality, and safety topics and has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. Dr. Streiff has received research funding from Sanofi‐Aventis and Bristol‐Myers Squibb; honoraria for Continuing Medial Education lectures from Sanofi‐Aventis and Ortho‐McNeil; consulted for Sanofi‐Aventis, Eisai, Daiichi‐Sankyo, and Janssen HealthCare; and has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. Mr. Lau, Drs. Haut, Streiff, and Shermock are supported by a contract from the Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute titled Preventing Venous Thromboembolism: Empowering Patients and Enabling Patient‐Centered Care via Health Information Technology (CE‐12‐11‐4489). Ms. Hobson has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. All others have no relevant funding or conflicts of interest to report.
- , , , et al. Patient values and preferences in decision making for antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review. Chest. 2012;141(2):e1S–e23S.
- , , , et al. Lessons from the Johns Hopkins Multi‐Disciplinary Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prevention Collaborative. BMJ. 2012;344:e3935.
- , , , et al. Impact of a venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis “smart order set”: improved compliance, fewer events. Am J Hematol. 2013;88(7):545–549.
- , , , et al. Improved prophylaxis and decreased preventable harm with a mandatory computerized clinical decision support tool for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in trauma patients. Arch Surg. 2012;147(10):901–907.
- , , , , . Linking processes and outcomes: a key strategy to prevent and report harm from venous thromboembolism in surgical patients. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(3):299–300.
- , , , et al. Patterns of non‐administration of ordered doses of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: implications for intervention strategies. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66311.
- , , , et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross‐sectional study. Lancet. 2008;371:387–394.
- , , , et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2765–2775.
- , , , et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthoplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2776–2786.
- , , , , , . Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:594–604.
- , , , , , . Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement (ADVANCE‐2): a randomized double‐blind trial. Lancet. 2010;275:807–815.
- , , , et al. Rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty. Pooled analysis of four studies. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105:444–453.
- , , , et al. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2167–2177.
- , , , et al. Efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis with low‐molecular‐weight heparin or rivaroxaban in hip and knee replacement surgery: findings from the ORTHO‐TEP registry. Thromb Haemost. 2013;109:154–163.
- , , , et al. Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:513–523.
- , , , et al. Patient values and preferences in decision making for antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review. Chest. 2012;141(2):e1S–e23S.
- , , , et al. Lessons from the Johns Hopkins Multi‐Disciplinary Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prevention Collaborative. BMJ. 2012;344:e3935.
- , , , et al. Impact of a venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis “smart order set”: improved compliance, fewer events. Am J Hematol. 2013;88(7):545–549.
- , , , et al. Improved prophylaxis and decreased preventable harm with a mandatory computerized clinical decision support tool for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in trauma patients. Arch Surg. 2012;147(10):901–907.
- , , , , . Linking processes and outcomes: a key strategy to prevent and report harm from venous thromboembolism in surgical patients. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(3):299–300.
- , , , et al. Patterns of non‐administration of ordered doses of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: implications for intervention strategies. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66311.
- , , , et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross‐sectional study. Lancet. 2008;371:387–394.
- , , , et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2765–2775.
- , , , et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthoplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2776–2786.
- , , , , , . Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:594–604.
- , , , , , . Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement (ADVANCE‐2): a randomized double‐blind trial. Lancet. 2010;275:807–815.
- , , , et al. Rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty. Pooled analysis of four studies. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105:444–453.
- , , , et al. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2167–2177.
- , , , et al. Efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis with low‐molecular‐weight heparin or rivaroxaban in hip and knee replacement surgery: findings from the ORTHO‐TEP registry. Thromb Haemost. 2013;109:154–163.
- , , , et al. Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:513–523.
Letter to the Editor
We thank Dr. Louwrens for his response to our article, Front‐Line Ordering Clinicians: Matching Workforce to Workload.[1] We agree that matching workload and workforce is essential to optimizing health and financial outcomes, as well as patient and workforce satisfaction.
The articles by Elliot et al.[2] and Wachter[3] are important discussions on the relationships among workforce, efficiency, and quality outcomes. However, as Wachter notes, the same ratios are not applicable to all settings. With this in mind, our matrix tool allows individual practice settings to modify variables (such as the desired front‐line ordering clinician to workload units) based on local circumstances and validation. The tool also allows users to add variables (such as support infrastructure) that may be relevant to their setting.
We also appreciate Dr. Louwrens' comments on factors that impede the optimal matching of workload to workforce. Although barriers and resistance will always exist, we think that a data‐driven approach to measuring workload and workforce can help demonstrate need in a systematic way that can help overcome pushback. Further research correlating use of the tool to improved quality and cost outcomes will help demonstrate to institutions and payers that better matching of workforce to workload, including through flexible staffing strategies, yields higher‐value outcomes.
- , , , et al. Front‐line ordering clinicians: matching workforce to workload. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(7):457–462.
- , , , et al. Effect of hospitalist workload on the quality and efficiency of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):786–793.
- . Hospitalist workload: the search for the magic number. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):794–795.
We thank Dr. Louwrens for his response to our article, Front‐Line Ordering Clinicians: Matching Workforce to Workload.[1] We agree that matching workload and workforce is essential to optimizing health and financial outcomes, as well as patient and workforce satisfaction.
The articles by Elliot et al.[2] and Wachter[3] are important discussions on the relationships among workforce, efficiency, and quality outcomes. However, as Wachter notes, the same ratios are not applicable to all settings. With this in mind, our matrix tool allows individual practice settings to modify variables (such as the desired front‐line ordering clinician to workload units) based on local circumstances and validation. The tool also allows users to add variables (such as support infrastructure) that may be relevant to their setting.
We also appreciate Dr. Louwrens' comments on factors that impede the optimal matching of workload to workforce. Although barriers and resistance will always exist, we think that a data‐driven approach to measuring workload and workforce can help demonstrate need in a systematic way that can help overcome pushback. Further research correlating use of the tool to improved quality and cost outcomes will help demonstrate to institutions and payers that better matching of workforce to workload, including through flexible staffing strategies, yields higher‐value outcomes.
We thank Dr. Louwrens for his response to our article, Front‐Line Ordering Clinicians: Matching Workforce to Workload.[1] We agree that matching workload and workforce is essential to optimizing health and financial outcomes, as well as patient and workforce satisfaction.
The articles by Elliot et al.[2] and Wachter[3] are important discussions on the relationships among workforce, efficiency, and quality outcomes. However, as Wachter notes, the same ratios are not applicable to all settings. With this in mind, our matrix tool allows individual practice settings to modify variables (such as the desired front‐line ordering clinician to workload units) based on local circumstances and validation. The tool also allows users to add variables (such as support infrastructure) that may be relevant to their setting.
We also appreciate Dr. Louwrens' comments on factors that impede the optimal matching of workload to workforce. Although barriers and resistance will always exist, we think that a data‐driven approach to measuring workload and workforce can help demonstrate need in a systematic way that can help overcome pushback. Further research correlating use of the tool to improved quality and cost outcomes will help demonstrate to institutions and payers that better matching of workforce to workload, including through flexible staffing strategies, yields higher‐value outcomes.
- , , , et al. Front‐line ordering clinicians: matching workforce to workload. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(7):457–462.
- , , , et al. Effect of hospitalist workload on the quality and efficiency of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):786–793.
- . Hospitalist workload: the search for the magic number. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):794–795.
- , , , et al. Front‐line ordering clinicians: matching workforce to workload. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(7):457–462.
- , , , et al. Effect of hospitalist workload on the quality and efficiency of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):786–793.
- . Hospitalist workload: the search for the magic number. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):794–795.
Letter to the Editor
I applaud the authors of Front‐Line Ordering Clinicians: Matching Workforce to Workload[1] for opening up a dialogue addressing an escalating workforce‐workload mismatch.
Indirectly pertaining to workforce and workload, Elliot et al. and Wachter published data supporting 15 patients a day, improving length of stay and lowering costs.[2, 3] Although unproven, many believe a cap may produce care of higher quality and safety.
Some regional factors impeding an optimal patient workload are: (1) flexibility limitations (as touted in the matrix care model), (2) recruitment difficulties, (3) realistic usefulness of support infrastructure (eg, variation in electronic health record ease of use, midlevel/resident availability, transitions of care support infrastructure), (4) payer mix dictating inadequate workforce, and (5) failure of hospital administrators in recognizing differences and adapting operations management to the work of physicians (high hospitalist turnover might suggest such an ailment).
Physicians in denial over the adverse effects of excessive load, or simply concerned over financial losses, may obstruct necessary safety changes. Astonishingly, and shamefully, agents for safety change can be labeled as counter‐ or unproductive!
Mandating a more manageable workload, somewhat akin to the Federal Aviation Administration's rest rules for pilots, already soundly validated by established fatigue science, may be on the horizon. Further studies into the elusive world of physician workflow might guide this.
- , , , et al. Front‐line ordering clinicians: matching workforce to workload. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(7):457–462.
- , , , et al. Effect of hospitalist workload on the quality and efficiency of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):786–793.
- . Hospitalist workload: the search for the magic number. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):794–795.
I applaud the authors of Front‐Line Ordering Clinicians: Matching Workforce to Workload[1] for opening up a dialogue addressing an escalating workforce‐workload mismatch.
Indirectly pertaining to workforce and workload, Elliot et al. and Wachter published data supporting 15 patients a day, improving length of stay and lowering costs.[2, 3] Although unproven, many believe a cap may produce care of higher quality and safety.
Some regional factors impeding an optimal patient workload are: (1) flexibility limitations (as touted in the matrix care model), (2) recruitment difficulties, (3) realistic usefulness of support infrastructure (eg, variation in electronic health record ease of use, midlevel/resident availability, transitions of care support infrastructure), (4) payer mix dictating inadequate workforce, and (5) failure of hospital administrators in recognizing differences and adapting operations management to the work of physicians (high hospitalist turnover might suggest such an ailment).
Physicians in denial over the adverse effects of excessive load, or simply concerned over financial losses, may obstruct necessary safety changes. Astonishingly, and shamefully, agents for safety change can be labeled as counter‐ or unproductive!
Mandating a more manageable workload, somewhat akin to the Federal Aviation Administration's rest rules for pilots, already soundly validated by established fatigue science, may be on the horizon. Further studies into the elusive world of physician workflow might guide this.
I applaud the authors of Front‐Line Ordering Clinicians: Matching Workforce to Workload[1] for opening up a dialogue addressing an escalating workforce‐workload mismatch.
Indirectly pertaining to workforce and workload, Elliot et al. and Wachter published data supporting 15 patients a day, improving length of stay and lowering costs.[2, 3] Although unproven, many believe a cap may produce care of higher quality and safety.
Some regional factors impeding an optimal patient workload are: (1) flexibility limitations (as touted in the matrix care model), (2) recruitment difficulties, (3) realistic usefulness of support infrastructure (eg, variation in electronic health record ease of use, midlevel/resident availability, transitions of care support infrastructure), (4) payer mix dictating inadequate workforce, and (5) failure of hospital administrators in recognizing differences and adapting operations management to the work of physicians (high hospitalist turnover might suggest such an ailment).
Physicians in denial over the adverse effects of excessive load, or simply concerned over financial losses, may obstruct necessary safety changes. Astonishingly, and shamefully, agents for safety change can be labeled as counter‐ or unproductive!
Mandating a more manageable workload, somewhat akin to the Federal Aviation Administration's rest rules for pilots, already soundly validated by established fatigue science, may be on the horizon. Further studies into the elusive world of physician workflow might guide this.
- , , , et al. Front‐line ordering clinicians: matching workforce to workload. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(7):457–462.
- , , , et al. Effect of hospitalist workload on the quality and efficiency of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):786–793.
- . Hospitalist workload: the search for the magic number. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):794–795.
- , , , et al. Front‐line ordering clinicians: matching workforce to workload. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(7):457–462.
- , , , et al. Effect of hospitalist workload on the quality and efficiency of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):786–793.
- . Hospitalist workload: the search for the magic number. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):794–795.
Best practices for the surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy
During the 43rd AAGL Global Congress, held November 17–21 in Vancouver, British Columbia, Sarah L. Cohen, MD, MPH, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, stepped attendees through diagnosis and surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy, noting the approaches backed by the highest-quality data.
The incidence of adnexal masses in pregnancy is 1 in every 600 live births. A mass can be benign or malignant. Among benign masses found in pregnancy are functional cysts, teratomas, and the corpus luteum.
Work-up
Ultrasound imaging is a valuable component of the work-up, owing to its risk-free nature. Magnetic resonance imaging may be appropriate in selected cases, but gadolinium contrast should be avoided.
In pregnancy, the aim is to limit ionizing radiation to less than 5 to 10 rads to minimize the risk of childhood malignancy/leukemia, with no single imaging study exceeding 5 rads.
Tumor markers may be helpful, but careful interpretation is critical, taking into account the effects of pregnancy itself on CA-125 (which peaks in the first trimester), human chorionic gonadotropin, alpha fetoprotein, inhibin A, and lactate dehydrogenase.
When expectant management may be appropriate
Watchful waiting may be considered for simple cysts less than 6 cm in size, provided the patient is asymptomatic with no signs of malignancy.
Surgery is indicated when the patient is symptomatic, when there is a concern for malignancy, and when a persistent mass exceeds 10 cm in size.
As always, elective surgery is preferable, as emergent surgery in pregnancy is associated with a risk of preterm labor of 22% to 35%.
Optimal timing of surgery
Surgery can be performed safely in any trimester, provided the gynecologist is aware of special concerns. For example, in the first trimester, organogenesis is under way and the corpus luteum is still present. If the corpus luteum is removed, progesterone supplementation is necessary.
When surgery can be postponed to the second trimester, it allows time for possible resolution of the mass.
Mode of surgery
Laparoscopy allows for faster recovery, less pain (and, therefore, lower narcotic exposure to the fetus), and improved maternal ventilation.
Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism is indicated through the use of pneumatic compression devices and, when appropriate, heparin.
Initial port placement can be performed using a Hassan technique, Veress needle, or optical trocar.
Insufflation pressures of 10 to 15 mm Hg are safe, with intraoperative monitoring of carbon dioxide.
Availability of guidelines
Surgeons should make use of guidelines, when feasible, to guide surgery. For example, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) publishes guidelines on surgery during pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also offers guidelines.
Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.
During the 43rd AAGL Global Congress, held November 17–21 in Vancouver, British Columbia, Sarah L. Cohen, MD, MPH, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, stepped attendees through diagnosis and surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy, noting the approaches backed by the highest-quality data.
The incidence of adnexal masses in pregnancy is 1 in every 600 live births. A mass can be benign or malignant. Among benign masses found in pregnancy are functional cysts, teratomas, and the corpus luteum.
Work-up
Ultrasound imaging is a valuable component of the work-up, owing to its risk-free nature. Magnetic resonance imaging may be appropriate in selected cases, but gadolinium contrast should be avoided.
In pregnancy, the aim is to limit ionizing radiation to less than 5 to 10 rads to minimize the risk of childhood malignancy/leukemia, with no single imaging study exceeding 5 rads.
Tumor markers may be helpful, but careful interpretation is critical, taking into account the effects of pregnancy itself on CA-125 (which peaks in the first trimester), human chorionic gonadotropin, alpha fetoprotein, inhibin A, and lactate dehydrogenase.
When expectant management may be appropriate
Watchful waiting may be considered for simple cysts less than 6 cm in size, provided the patient is asymptomatic with no signs of malignancy.
Surgery is indicated when the patient is symptomatic, when there is a concern for malignancy, and when a persistent mass exceeds 10 cm in size.
As always, elective surgery is preferable, as emergent surgery in pregnancy is associated with a risk of preterm labor of 22% to 35%.
Optimal timing of surgery
Surgery can be performed safely in any trimester, provided the gynecologist is aware of special concerns. For example, in the first trimester, organogenesis is under way and the corpus luteum is still present. If the corpus luteum is removed, progesterone supplementation is necessary.
When surgery can be postponed to the second trimester, it allows time for possible resolution of the mass.
Mode of surgery
Laparoscopy allows for faster recovery, less pain (and, therefore, lower narcotic exposure to the fetus), and improved maternal ventilation.
Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism is indicated through the use of pneumatic compression devices and, when appropriate, heparin.
Initial port placement can be performed using a Hassan technique, Veress needle, or optical trocar.
Insufflation pressures of 10 to 15 mm Hg are safe, with intraoperative monitoring of carbon dioxide.
Availability of guidelines
Surgeons should make use of guidelines, when feasible, to guide surgery. For example, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) publishes guidelines on surgery during pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also offers guidelines.
Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.
During the 43rd AAGL Global Congress, held November 17–21 in Vancouver, British Columbia, Sarah L. Cohen, MD, MPH, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, stepped attendees through diagnosis and surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy, noting the approaches backed by the highest-quality data.
The incidence of adnexal masses in pregnancy is 1 in every 600 live births. A mass can be benign or malignant. Among benign masses found in pregnancy are functional cysts, teratomas, and the corpus luteum.
Work-up
Ultrasound imaging is a valuable component of the work-up, owing to its risk-free nature. Magnetic resonance imaging may be appropriate in selected cases, but gadolinium contrast should be avoided.
In pregnancy, the aim is to limit ionizing radiation to less than 5 to 10 rads to minimize the risk of childhood malignancy/leukemia, with no single imaging study exceeding 5 rads.
Tumor markers may be helpful, but careful interpretation is critical, taking into account the effects of pregnancy itself on CA-125 (which peaks in the first trimester), human chorionic gonadotropin, alpha fetoprotein, inhibin A, and lactate dehydrogenase.
When expectant management may be appropriate
Watchful waiting may be considered for simple cysts less than 6 cm in size, provided the patient is asymptomatic with no signs of malignancy.
Surgery is indicated when the patient is symptomatic, when there is a concern for malignancy, and when a persistent mass exceeds 10 cm in size.
As always, elective surgery is preferable, as emergent surgery in pregnancy is associated with a risk of preterm labor of 22% to 35%.
Optimal timing of surgery
Surgery can be performed safely in any trimester, provided the gynecologist is aware of special concerns. For example, in the first trimester, organogenesis is under way and the corpus luteum is still present. If the corpus luteum is removed, progesterone supplementation is necessary.
When surgery can be postponed to the second trimester, it allows time for possible resolution of the mass.
Mode of surgery
Laparoscopy allows for faster recovery, less pain (and, therefore, lower narcotic exposure to the fetus), and improved maternal ventilation.
Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism is indicated through the use of pneumatic compression devices and, when appropriate, heparin.
Initial port placement can be performed using a Hassan technique, Veress needle, or optical trocar.
Insufflation pressures of 10 to 15 mm Hg are safe, with intraoperative monitoring of carbon dioxide.
Availability of guidelines
Surgeons should make use of guidelines, when feasible, to guide surgery. For example, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) publishes guidelines on surgery during pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also offers guidelines.
Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.
Sickle cell anemia trial halted because of early success
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute announced the premature termination of TWiTCH, its clinical trial of children with sickle cell disease, because researchers met their goal ahead of schedule.
The NHLBI stated in a press release that the trial was stopped in agreement with the recommendations of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) – an independent group of experts that regularly reviews accumulating data from ongoing clinical trials and makes recommendations to investigators and sponsors on how to move forward.
“The DSMB’s planned first interim analysis of the TWiTCH study data indicated that the study had reached its primary and most important endpoint,” the NHLBI said in the statement. “As such, they recommended that the study end due to early results, particularly given that the strength of the statistical finding was unlikely to change with the collection of additional data.”
TWiTCH (Transcranial Doppler with Transfusions Changing to Hydroxyurea) was a phase III clinical trial created to determine whether daily doses of hydroxyurea lower the transcranial Doppler (TCD) blood velocity in children with sickle cell disease with the same efficacy as that of blood transfusions. Currently, hydroxyurea is the only Food and Drug Administration–approved drug for sickle cell disease, a disorder that affects children and puts them at increased risk for stroke if they have high TCD blood flow velocities.
According to the data accrued by the researchers prior to the study’s termination, hydroxyurea was found to be “not inferior to (that is, no worse than) regular blood transfusions in lowering TCD velocities in children with sickle cell disease who are at high risk for stroke.”
“The results of TWiTCH will allow the families of children with sickle cell disease and who are at increased risk of stroke, to choose between two equally effective preventive therapies,” Dr. Keith Hoots, director of the NHLBI’s division of blood diseases and resources, said in an interview. “The TWiTCH trial is the most recent example of NHLBI’s ongoing commitment to the development of new therapies for the prevention and treatment of stroke in children with sickle cell disease.”
According to information from the American Society of Hematology, the trial included 25 participating centers from around the United States, and was funded by the NHLBI with sponsorship from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute announced the premature termination of TWiTCH, its clinical trial of children with sickle cell disease, because researchers met their goal ahead of schedule.
The NHLBI stated in a press release that the trial was stopped in agreement with the recommendations of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) – an independent group of experts that regularly reviews accumulating data from ongoing clinical trials and makes recommendations to investigators and sponsors on how to move forward.
“The DSMB’s planned first interim analysis of the TWiTCH study data indicated that the study had reached its primary and most important endpoint,” the NHLBI said in the statement. “As such, they recommended that the study end due to early results, particularly given that the strength of the statistical finding was unlikely to change with the collection of additional data.”
TWiTCH (Transcranial Doppler with Transfusions Changing to Hydroxyurea) was a phase III clinical trial created to determine whether daily doses of hydroxyurea lower the transcranial Doppler (TCD) blood velocity in children with sickle cell disease with the same efficacy as that of blood transfusions. Currently, hydroxyurea is the only Food and Drug Administration–approved drug for sickle cell disease, a disorder that affects children and puts them at increased risk for stroke if they have high TCD blood flow velocities.
According to the data accrued by the researchers prior to the study’s termination, hydroxyurea was found to be “not inferior to (that is, no worse than) regular blood transfusions in lowering TCD velocities in children with sickle cell disease who are at high risk for stroke.”
“The results of TWiTCH will allow the families of children with sickle cell disease and who are at increased risk of stroke, to choose between two equally effective preventive therapies,” Dr. Keith Hoots, director of the NHLBI’s division of blood diseases and resources, said in an interview. “The TWiTCH trial is the most recent example of NHLBI’s ongoing commitment to the development of new therapies for the prevention and treatment of stroke in children with sickle cell disease.”
According to information from the American Society of Hematology, the trial included 25 participating centers from around the United States, and was funded by the NHLBI with sponsorship from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute announced the premature termination of TWiTCH, its clinical trial of children with sickle cell disease, because researchers met their goal ahead of schedule.
The NHLBI stated in a press release that the trial was stopped in agreement with the recommendations of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) – an independent group of experts that regularly reviews accumulating data from ongoing clinical trials and makes recommendations to investigators and sponsors on how to move forward.
“The DSMB’s planned first interim analysis of the TWiTCH study data indicated that the study had reached its primary and most important endpoint,” the NHLBI said in the statement. “As such, they recommended that the study end due to early results, particularly given that the strength of the statistical finding was unlikely to change with the collection of additional data.”
TWiTCH (Transcranial Doppler with Transfusions Changing to Hydroxyurea) was a phase III clinical trial created to determine whether daily doses of hydroxyurea lower the transcranial Doppler (TCD) blood velocity in children with sickle cell disease with the same efficacy as that of blood transfusions. Currently, hydroxyurea is the only Food and Drug Administration–approved drug for sickle cell disease, a disorder that affects children and puts them at increased risk for stroke if they have high TCD blood flow velocities.
According to the data accrued by the researchers prior to the study’s termination, hydroxyurea was found to be “not inferior to (that is, no worse than) regular blood transfusions in lowering TCD velocities in children with sickle cell disease who are at high risk for stroke.”
“The results of TWiTCH will allow the families of children with sickle cell disease and who are at increased risk of stroke, to choose between two equally effective preventive therapies,” Dr. Keith Hoots, director of the NHLBI’s division of blood diseases and resources, said in an interview. “The TWiTCH trial is the most recent example of NHLBI’s ongoing commitment to the development of new therapies for the prevention and treatment of stroke in children with sickle cell disease.”
According to information from the American Society of Hematology, the trial included 25 participating centers from around the United States, and was funded by the NHLBI with sponsorship from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.
New and Noteworthy Information—December 2014
Two-year folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation did not improve performance in four cognitive domains in elderly people with elevated homocysteine levels, according to a study published online ahead of print November 12 in Neurology. A total of 2,919 participants with an average age of 74 took either a tablet with 400 μg of folic acid and 500 μg of vitamin B12, or a placebo every day for two years. Tests of memory and thinking skills were performed at the beginning and end of the study. All participants had high blood levels of homocysteine. “While the homocysteine levels decreased by more in the group taking the B vitamins than in the group taking the placebo, unfortunately, there was no difference between the two groups in the scores on the thinking and memory tests,” the researchers stated.
Among more than 43,000 children treated in 25 emergency departments for blunt head trauma, traumatic brain injury (TBI) was identified on CT scans in 7% of the patients, according to a study published November 13 in the New England Journal of Medicine. In children 12 and younger, falls were the most common cause of head injury—among those younger than 2, falls accounted for 77% of head injuries, and in those 2 to 12, falls accounted for 38% of injuries. In children ages 13 to 17, 24% of injuries were due to assault, 19% were sports-related, and 18% resulted from motor vehicle accidents. Among all cases, 98% had mild head trauma. During diagnosis and treatment, cranial CT scans were performed on 37% of the children, “many arguably unnecessarily,” according to the researchers.
Preadmission use of COX-2 inhibitors was associated with increased 30-day mortality after ischemic stroke, but not hemorrhagic stroke, according to a study published online ahead of print November 5 in Neurology. Researchers analyzed records of 100,243 patients hospitalized for a first stroke between 2004 and 2012 and deaths within one month after the stroke. The investigators examined whether participants were current, former, or nonusers of these drugs within two months of the stroke. Overall, people who were current users of COX-2 inhibitors were 19% more likely to die after stroke than were people who did not take the drugs. New users of the older COX-2 drugs were 42% more likely to die from stroke than were those who were not taking the drugs.
Once-daily, low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, nonfatal stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction among patients age 60 or older with atherosclerotic risk factors, according to a study published online ahead of print November 17 in JAMA. This study included 14,464 Japanese patients with hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes mellitus who were randomized to aspirin (100 mg/d) or no aspirin in addition to ongoing medications. The researchers found no statistically significant difference between the two groups in time to the primary end point. The cumulative primary event rate was similar in participants in the aspirin group (2.77%) and those in the no-aspirin group (2.96%) five years after randomization. Aspirin significantly reduced the incidence of nonfatal heart attack and transient ischemic attack, and significantly increased the risk of extracranial hemorrhage requiring transfusion or hospitalization.
Overall symptom burden is the only independent predictor of prolonged symptoms after sport-related concussion, investigators reported online ahead of print November 7 in Neurology. The researchers conducted a prospective cohort study of 531 patients in a sports concussion clinic. Participants completed questionnaires that included the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS). Patients ranged in age from 7 to 26 (mean age, 14.6). The mean PCSS score at the initial visit was 26, and mean time to presentation was 12 days. Only total score on symptom inventory was independently associated with symptoms lasting longer than 28 days. No other potential predictor variables were independently associated with symptom duration or were useful in developing the optimal regression decision tree. Most participants with an initial PCSS score of less than 13 had resolution of their symptoms within 28 days of injury.
The ketogenic diet and modified Atkins diet show modest efficacy, although in some patients the effect is “remarkable” in the treatment of refractory epilepsy in adults, according to a study published online ahead of print October 29 in Neurology. Researchers reviewed five studies on the ketogenic diet that included 47 people and five studies on the modified Atkins diet that included 85 people. The investigators found that across all studies, 32% of people treated with the ketogenic diet and 29% of those treated with the modified Atkins diet had a 50% or better reduction in their seizures. Nine percent in the ketogenic treatment group and 5% in the modified Atkins group had a greater than 90% reduction in seizures. “These studies show the diets are moderately to very effective as another option for people with epilepsy,” stated the study authors.
The evaluation of serum micro-RNAs may help to identify the severity of brain injury and the risk of developing adverse effects after traumatic brain injury (TBI), according to a study published November 7 in PLoS One. Researchers identified a unique and specific group of microRNAs, which were detected in blood immediately after injury to the brain in mice. The results suggest that the microRNAs can be measured in the blood as proxies for mild TBI. The microRNA panel identified in this study is unique and does not overlap with blood microRNAs of post-traumatic stress disorder, as previously reported. “This important finding is a step forward in identifying objective biomarkers for mild TBI that may be further validated to accurately and cost effectively identify mild TBI in service members and civilians with brain injuries,” said the investigators.
The FDA has approved Lemtrada (alemtuzumab) for the treatment of patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). The approval comes nearly one year after the FDA declined to approve the drug, citing a lack of well-controlled data from clinical studies at the time indicating that the benefits had outweighed the risks. After an appeal by Genzyme (Cambridge, Massachusetts) and a new review by the FDA, the agency approved the drug based on two pivotal, randomized phase III, open-label, rater-blinded studies, comparing treatment with Lemtrada to interferon beta-1a, in patients with relapsing-remitting MS who were either new to treatment (CARE-MS I) or who had relapsed while on prior therapy (CARE-MS II). Lemtrada is recommended for patients who have had an inadequate response to two or more drugs indicated for the treatment of MS.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) exhibited a dose-dependent inverse association with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), according to a study published online ahead of print November 10 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers included 729 patients diagnosed with ALS between January 2002 and December 2008. The patients were compared with 14,580 controls. Fifteen percent of patients with ALS reported ACEI use between two and five years before their ALS diagnosis, and 18% of the control group without ALS reported ACEI use. When compared with patients who did not use ACEIs, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.83 for the group prescribed ACEIs lower than 449.5 of the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) and 0.43 cDDD for the group with a cumulative ACEI use of greater than 449.5 cDDD.
Patients treated at hospitals with higher volumes of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) cases have lower in-hospital mortality, independent of patient and hospital characteristics, according to a study published in the November Neurosurgery. In a large nationwide registry, researchers identified nearly 32,000 patients with SAH treated at 685 United States hospitals between 2003 and 2012. The median annual case volume per hospital was 8.5 patients. Mean in-hospital mortality was 25.7% but was lower with increasing annual SAH volume. Hospital SAH volume was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79 for quartile 4 vs quartile 1), independent of patient and other hospital characteristics. “Our results may have significant implications for regional stroke policies and procedures and affirm the recent recommendations that patients with SAH be treated at high-volume centers,” said study authors.
The use of a specialized ambulance—stroke emergency mobile unit (STEMO)—increases the percentage of patients receiving thrombolysis within 60 minutes, according to a study published online ahead of print November 17 in JAMA Neurology. A total of 3,213 emergency calls for suspected stroke occurred during weeks when STEMO was available, and 2,969 calls occurred during control weeks when STEMO was not available. Two hundred of 614 patients with stroke (32.6%) received thrombolysis when the STEMO was deployed, and 330 of 1,497 patients (22%) received thrombolysis in conventional care. Median onset to treatment was 24.5 minutes shorter after STEMO deployment, compared with conventional care. In all ischemic strokes, the rate of “golden hour” thrombolysis increased from 16 of the 1,497 patients (1.1%) during conventional care to 62 of 614 (10.1%) after STEMO deployment. Overall, golden hour thrombolysis entails no risk to the patients’ safety and is associated with better short-term outcomes, according to the researchers.
Granger causality (GC) analysis of intracranial EEG (iEEG) has the potential to increase understanding of preictal network activity and help improve surgical outcomes in cases of otherwise ambiguous iEEG onset, according to a study published online ahead of print November 4 in Epilepsia. In 10 retrospective and two prospective patients with epilepsy, iEEG was recorded at 500 or 1,000 Hz, using as many as 128 surface and depth electrodes. In all patients, the researchers found significant, widespread preictal GC network activity at peak frequencies from 80 to 250 Hz, beginning two to 42 seconds before visible electrographic onset. In the two prospective patients, GC source/sink comparisons supported the exclusion of early ictal regions that were not the dominant causal sources and contributed to planning of more limited surgical resections. Both groups of patients had a class 1 outcome at one year.
Tiny silent acute infarcts may be a cause of leukoaraiosis, a finding that points toward a potentially treatable form of dementia, investigators reported online ahead of print October 4 in Annals of Neurology. The study involved five patients with leukoaraiosis who underwent detailed MRI scanning of their brains every week for 16 consecutive weeks. The MRI scans revealed new tiny spots arising de novo in the cerebral white matter. The lesions were “clinically silent and had the signature features of acute ischemic stroke, according to the researchers. “With time, the characteristics of these lesions approached those of pre-existing leukoaraiosis,” the study authors stated.
—Kimberly D. Williams
Two-year folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation did not improve performance in four cognitive domains in elderly people with elevated homocysteine levels, according to a study published online ahead of print November 12 in Neurology. A total of 2,919 participants with an average age of 74 took either a tablet with 400 μg of folic acid and 500 μg of vitamin B12, or a placebo every day for two years. Tests of memory and thinking skills were performed at the beginning and end of the study. All participants had high blood levels of homocysteine. “While the homocysteine levels decreased by more in the group taking the B vitamins than in the group taking the placebo, unfortunately, there was no difference between the two groups in the scores on the thinking and memory tests,” the researchers stated.
Among more than 43,000 children treated in 25 emergency departments for blunt head trauma, traumatic brain injury (TBI) was identified on CT scans in 7% of the patients, according to a study published November 13 in the New England Journal of Medicine. In children 12 and younger, falls were the most common cause of head injury—among those younger than 2, falls accounted for 77% of head injuries, and in those 2 to 12, falls accounted for 38% of injuries. In children ages 13 to 17, 24% of injuries were due to assault, 19% were sports-related, and 18% resulted from motor vehicle accidents. Among all cases, 98% had mild head trauma. During diagnosis and treatment, cranial CT scans were performed on 37% of the children, “many arguably unnecessarily,” according to the researchers.
Preadmission use of COX-2 inhibitors was associated with increased 30-day mortality after ischemic stroke, but not hemorrhagic stroke, according to a study published online ahead of print November 5 in Neurology. Researchers analyzed records of 100,243 patients hospitalized for a first stroke between 2004 and 2012 and deaths within one month after the stroke. The investigators examined whether participants were current, former, or nonusers of these drugs within two months of the stroke. Overall, people who were current users of COX-2 inhibitors were 19% more likely to die after stroke than were people who did not take the drugs. New users of the older COX-2 drugs were 42% more likely to die from stroke than were those who were not taking the drugs.
Once-daily, low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, nonfatal stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction among patients age 60 or older with atherosclerotic risk factors, according to a study published online ahead of print November 17 in JAMA. This study included 14,464 Japanese patients with hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes mellitus who were randomized to aspirin (100 mg/d) or no aspirin in addition to ongoing medications. The researchers found no statistically significant difference between the two groups in time to the primary end point. The cumulative primary event rate was similar in participants in the aspirin group (2.77%) and those in the no-aspirin group (2.96%) five years after randomization. Aspirin significantly reduced the incidence of nonfatal heart attack and transient ischemic attack, and significantly increased the risk of extracranial hemorrhage requiring transfusion or hospitalization.
Overall symptom burden is the only independent predictor of prolonged symptoms after sport-related concussion, investigators reported online ahead of print November 7 in Neurology. The researchers conducted a prospective cohort study of 531 patients in a sports concussion clinic. Participants completed questionnaires that included the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS). Patients ranged in age from 7 to 26 (mean age, 14.6). The mean PCSS score at the initial visit was 26, and mean time to presentation was 12 days. Only total score on symptom inventory was independently associated with symptoms lasting longer than 28 days. No other potential predictor variables were independently associated with symptom duration or were useful in developing the optimal regression decision tree. Most participants with an initial PCSS score of less than 13 had resolution of their symptoms within 28 days of injury.
The ketogenic diet and modified Atkins diet show modest efficacy, although in some patients the effect is “remarkable” in the treatment of refractory epilepsy in adults, according to a study published online ahead of print October 29 in Neurology. Researchers reviewed five studies on the ketogenic diet that included 47 people and five studies on the modified Atkins diet that included 85 people. The investigators found that across all studies, 32% of people treated with the ketogenic diet and 29% of those treated with the modified Atkins diet had a 50% or better reduction in their seizures. Nine percent in the ketogenic treatment group and 5% in the modified Atkins group had a greater than 90% reduction in seizures. “These studies show the diets are moderately to very effective as another option for people with epilepsy,” stated the study authors.
The evaluation of serum micro-RNAs may help to identify the severity of brain injury and the risk of developing adverse effects after traumatic brain injury (TBI), according to a study published November 7 in PLoS One. Researchers identified a unique and specific group of microRNAs, which were detected in blood immediately after injury to the brain in mice. The results suggest that the microRNAs can be measured in the blood as proxies for mild TBI. The microRNA panel identified in this study is unique and does not overlap with blood microRNAs of post-traumatic stress disorder, as previously reported. “This important finding is a step forward in identifying objective biomarkers for mild TBI that may be further validated to accurately and cost effectively identify mild TBI in service members and civilians with brain injuries,” said the investigators.
The FDA has approved Lemtrada (alemtuzumab) for the treatment of patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). The approval comes nearly one year after the FDA declined to approve the drug, citing a lack of well-controlled data from clinical studies at the time indicating that the benefits had outweighed the risks. After an appeal by Genzyme (Cambridge, Massachusetts) and a new review by the FDA, the agency approved the drug based on two pivotal, randomized phase III, open-label, rater-blinded studies, comparing treatment with Lemtrada to interferon beta-1a, in patients with relapsing-remitting MS who were either new to treatment (CARE-MS I) or who had relapsed while on prior therapy (CARE-MS II). Lemtrada is recommended for patients who have had an inadequate response to two or more drugs indicated for the treatment of MS.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) exhibited a dose-dependent inverse association with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), according to a study published online ahead of print November 10 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers included 729 patients diagnosed with ALS between January 2002 and December 2008. The patients were compared with 14,580 controls. Fifteen percent of patients with ALS reported ACEI use between two and five years before their ALS diagnosis, and 18% of the control group without ALS reported ACEI use. When compared with patients who did not use ACEIs, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.83 for the group prescribed ACEIs lower than 449.5 of the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) and 0.43 cDDD for the group with a cumulative ACEI use of greater than 449.5 cDDD.
Patients treated at hospitals with higher volumes of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) cases have lower in-hospital mortality, independent of patient and hospital characteristics, according to a study published in the November Neurosurgery. In a large nationwide registry, researchers identified nearly 32,000 patients with SAH treated at 685 United States hospitals between 2003 and 2012. The median annual case volume per hospital was 8.5 patients. Mean in-hospital mortality was 25.7% but was lower with increasing annual SAH volume. Hospital SAH volume was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79 for quartile 4 vs quartile 1), independent of patient and other hospital characteristics. “Our results may have significant implications for regional stroke policies and procedures and affirm the recent recommendations that patients with SAH be treated at high-volume centers,” said study authors.
The use of a specialized ambulance—stroke emergency mobile unit (STEMO)—increases the percentage of patients receiving thrombolysis within 60 minutes, according to a study published online ahead of print November 17 in JAMA Neurology. A total of 3,213 emergency calls for suspected stroke occurred during weeks when STEMO was available, and 2,969 calls occurred during control weeks when STEMO was not available. Two hundred of 614 patients with stroke (32.6%) received thrombolysis when the STEMO was deployed, and 330 of 1,497 patients (22%) received thrombolysis in conventional care. Median onset to treatment was 24.5 minutes shorter after STEMO deployment, compared with conventional care. In all ischemic strokes, the rate of “golden hour” thrombolysis increased from 16 of the 1,497 patients (1.1%) during conventional care to 62 of 614 (10.1%) after STEMO deployment. Overall, golden hour thrombolysis entails no risk to the patients’ safety and is associated with better short-term outcomes, according to the researchers.
Granger causality (GC) analysis of intracranial EEG (iEEG) has the potential to increase understanding of preictal network activity and help improve surgical outcomes in cases of otherwise ambiguous iEEG onset, according to a study published online ahead of print November 4 in Epilepsia. In 10 retrospective and two prospective patients with epilepsy, iEEG was recorded at 500 or 1,000 Hz, using as many as 128 surface and depth electrodes. In all patients, the researchers found significant, widespread preictal GC network activity at peak frequencies from 80 to 250 Hz, beginning two to 42 seconds before visible electrographic onset. In the two prospective patients, GC source/sink comparisons supported the exclusion of early ictal regions that were not the dominant causal sources and contributed to planning of more limited surgical resections. Both groups of patients had a class 1 outcome at one year.
Tiny silent acute infarcts may be a cause of leukoaraiosis, a finding that points toward a potentially treatable form of dementia, investigators reported online ahead of print October 4 in Annals of Neurology. The study involved five patients with leukoaraiosis who underwent detailed MRI scanning of their brains every week for 16 consecutive weeks. The MRI scans revealed new tiny spots arising de novo in the cerebral white matter. The lesions were “clinically silent and had the signature features of acute ischemic stroke, according to the researchers. “With time, the characteristics of these lesions approached those of pre-existing leukoaraiosis,” the study authors stated.
—Kimberly D. Williams
Two-year folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation did not improve performance in four cognitive domains in elderly people with elevated homocysteine levels, according to a study published online ahead of print November 12 in Neurology. A total of 2,919 participants with an average age of 74 took either a tablet with 400 μg of folic acid and 500 μg of vitamin B12, or a placebo every day for two years. Tests of memory and thinking skills were performed at the beginning and end of the study. All participants had high blood levels of homocysteine. “While the homocysteine levels decreased by more in the group taking the B vitamins than in the group taking the placebo, unfortunately, there was no difference between the two groups in the scores on the thinking and memory tests,” the researchers stated.
Among more than 43,000 children treated in 25 emergency departments for blunt head trauma, traumatic brain injury (TBI) was identified on CT scans in 7% of the patients, according to a study published November 13 in the New England Journal of Medicine. In children 12 and younger, falls were the most common cause of head injury—among those younger than 2, falls accounted for 77% of head injuries, and in those 2 to 12, falls accounted for 38% of injuries. In children ages 13 to 17, 24% of injuries were due to assault, 19% were sports-related, and 18% resulted from motor vehicle accidents. Among all cases, 98% had mild head trauma. During diagnosis and treatment, cranial CT scans were performed on 37% of the children, “many arguably unnecessarily,” according to the researchers.
Preadmission use of COX-2 inhibitors was associated with increased 30-day mortality after ischemic stroke, but not hemorrhagic stroke, according to a study published online ahead of print November 5 in Neurology. Researchers analyzed records of 100,243 patients hospitalized for a first stroke between 2004 and 2012 and deaths within one month after the stroke. The investigators examined whether participants were current, former, or nonusers of these drugs within two months of the stroke. Overall, people who were current users of COX-2 inhibitors were 19% more likely to die after stroke than were people who did not take the drugs. New users of the older COX-2 drugs were 42% more likely to die from stroke than were those who were not taking the drugs.
Once-daily, low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, nonfatal stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction among patients age 60 or older with atherosclerotic risk factors, according to a study published online ahead of print November 17 in JAMA. This study included 14,464 Japanese patients with hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes mellitus who were randomized to aspirin (100 mg/d) or no aspirin in addition to ongoing medications. The researchers found no statistically significant difference between the two groups in time to the primary end point. The cumulative primary event rate was similar in participants in the aspirin group (2.77%) and those in the no-aspirin group (2.96%) five years after randomization. Aspirin significantly reduced the incidence of nonfatal heart attack and transient ischemic attack, and significantly increased the risk of extracranial hemorrhage requiring transfusion or hospitalization.
Overall symptom burden is the only independent predictor of prolonged symptoms after sport-related concussion, investigators reported online ahead of print November 7 in Neurology. The researchers conducted a prospective cohort study of 531 patients in a sports concussion clinic. Participants completed questionnaires that included the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS). Patients ranged in age from 7 to 26 (mean age, 14.6). The mean PCSS score at the initial visit was 26, and mean time to presentation was 12 days. Only total score on symptom inventory was independently associated with symptoms lasting longer than 28 days. No other potential predictor variables were independently associated with symptom duration or were useful in developing the optimal regression decision tree. Most participants with an initial PCSS score of less than 13 had resolution of their symptoms within 28 days of injury.
The ketogenic diet and modified Atkins diet show modest efficacy, although in some patients the effect is “remarkable” in the treatment of refractory epilepsy in adults, according to a study published online ahead of print October 29 in Neurology. Researchers reviewed five studies on the ketogenic diet that included 47 people and five studies on the modified Atkins diet that included 85 people. The investigators found that across all studies, 32% of people treated with the ketogenic diet and 29% of those treated with the modified Atkins diet had a 50% or better reduction in their seizures. Nine percent in the ketogenic treatment group and 5% in the modified Atkins group had a greater than 90% reduction in seizures. “These studies show the diets are moderately to very effective as another option for people with epilepsy,” stated the study authors.
The evaluation of serum micro-RNAs may help to identify the severity of brain injury and the risk of developing adverse effects after traumatic brain injury (TBI), according to a study published November 7 in PLoS One. Researchers identified a unique and specific group of microRNAs, which were detected in blood immediately after injury to the brain in mice. The results suggest that the microRNAs can be measured in the blood as proxies for mild TBI. The microRNA panel identified in this study is unique and does not overlap with blood microRNAs of post-traumatic stress disorder, as previously reported. “This important finding is a step forward in identifying objective biomarkers for mild TBI that may be further validated to accurately and cost effectively identify mild TBI in service members and civilians with brain injuries,” said the investigators.
The FDA has approved Lemtrada (alemtuzumab) for the treatment of patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). The approval comes nearly one year after the FDA declined to approve the drug, citing a lack of well-controlled data from clinical studies at the time indicating that the benefits had outweighed the risks. After an appeal by Genzyme (Cambridge, Massachusetts) and a new review by the FDA, the agency approved the drug based on two pivotal, randomized phase III, open-label, rater-blinded studies, comparing treatment with Lemtrada to interferon beta-1a, in patients with relapsing-remitting MS who were either new to treatment (CARE-MS I) or who had relapsed while on prior therapy (CARE-MS II). Lemtrada is recommended for patients who have had an inadequate response to two or more drugs indicated for the treatment of MS.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) exhibited a dose-dependent inverse association with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), according to a study published online ahead of print November 10 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers included 729 patients diagnosed with ALS between January 2002 and December 2008. The patients were compared with 14,580 controls. Fifteen percent of patients with ALS reported ACEI use between two and five years before their ALS diagnosis, and 18% of the control group without ALS reported ACEI use. When compared with patients who did not use ACEIs, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.83 for the group prescribed ACEIs lower than 449.5 of the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) and 0.43 cDDD for the group with a cumulative ACEI use of greater than 449.5 cDDD.
Patients treated at hospitals with higher volumes of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) cases have lower in-hospital mortality, independent of patient and hospital characteristics, according to a study published in the November Neurosurgery. In a large nationwide registry, researchers identified nearly 32,000 patients with SAH treated at 685 United States hospitals between 2003 and 2012. The median annual case volume per hospital was 8.5 patients. Mean in-hospital mortality was 25.7% but was lower with increasing annual SAH volume. Hospital SAH volume was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79 for quartile 4 vs quartile 1), independent of patient and other hospital characteristics. “Our results may have significant implications for regional stroke policies and procedures and affirm the recent recommendations that patients with SAH be treated at high-volume centers,” said study authors.
The use of a specialized ambulance—stroke emergency mobile unit (STEMO)—increases the percentage of patients receiving thrombolysis within 60 minutes, according to a study published online ahead of print November 17 in JAMA Neurology. A total of 3,213 emergency calls for suspected stroke occurred during weeks when STEMO was available, and 2,969 calls occurred during control weeks when STEMO was not available. Two hundred of 614 patients with stroke (32.6%) received thrombolysis when the STEMO was deployed, and 330 of 1,497 patients (22%) received thrombolysis in conventional care. Median onset to treatment was 24.5 minutes shorter after STEMO deployment, compared with conventional care. In all ischemic strokes, the rate of “golden hour” thrombolysis increased from 16 of the 1,497 patients (1.1%) during conventional care to 62 of 614 (10.1%) after STEMO deployment. Overall, golden hour thrombolysis entails no risk to the patients’ safety and is associated with better short-term outcomes, according to the researchers.
Granger causality (GC) analysis of intracranial EEG (iEEG) has the potential to increase understanding of preictal network activity and help improve surgical outcomes in cases of otherwise ambiguous iEEG onset, according to a study published online ahead of print November 4 in Epilepsia. In 10 retrospective and two prospective patients with epilepsy, iEEG was recorded at 500 or 1,000 Hz, using as many as 128 surface and depth electrodes. In all patients, the researchers found significant, widespread preictal GC network activity at peak frequencies from 80 to 250 Hz, beginning two to 42 seconds before visible electrographic onset. In the two prospective patients, GC source/sink comparisons supported the exclusion of early ictal regions that were not the dominant causal sources and contributed to planning of more limited surgical resections. Both groups of patients had a class 1 outcome at one year.
Tiny silent acute infarcts may be a cause of leukoaraiosis, a finding that points toward a potentially treatable form of dementia, investigators reported online ahead of print October 4 in Annals of Neurology. The study involved five patients with leukoaraiosis who underwent detailed MRI scanning of their brains every week for 16 consecutive weeks. The MRI scans revealed new tiny spots arising de novo in the cerebral white matter. The lesions were “clinically silent and had the signature features of acute ischemic stroke, according to the researchers. “With time, the characteristics of these lesions approached those of pre-existing leukoaraiosis,” the study authors stated.
—Kimberly D. Williams
Therapy delivers long-term benefits in hemophilia B
Credit: University College
London Hospitals
A novel gene therapy can provide lasting clinical improvement for men with severe hemophilia B, according to research published in NEJM.
In a study of 10 men, the therapy increased factor IX levels, reduced bleeding episodes, and decreased the use of prophylactic factor IX concentrate. The therapy also allowed some patients to adopt a more active lifestyle.
Four patients experienced temporary increases in liver enzymes, but none reported late toxic effects at a median follow-up of 3 years.
“The data we are reporting mark a paradigm shift in treatment of hemophilia B and lay the groundwork for curing this major bleeding disorder,” said study author Amit Nathwani, MBChB, PhD, of the University College London Cancer Institute in the UK.
“The results also provide a solid platform for developing this gene transfer approach for treatment of other disorders, ranging from other congenital clotting deficiencies like hemophilia A to inborn errors of metabolism such as phenylketonuria.”
The therapy consists of a serotype 8 pseudotyped, self-complementary adeno-associated virus (AAV8) vector expressing a codon-optimized factor IX transgene (scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco).
Dr Nathwani and his colleagues tested scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco in 10 men with severe hemophilia B to determine the durability of transgene expression, the vector dose-response relationship, and the level of persistent or late toxicity.
Six of the patients had been enrolled in a phase 1 dose-escalation trial, with 2 patients each receiving a low, intermediate, or high dose of the therapy. The other 4 patients received the high dose (2 × 1012 vector genomes per kg of body weight). Patients received scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco as a single infusion.
Factor IX levels rose in all 10 men following the infusion and have remained stable for a median of 3.2 years (range, 1.5 to 4.3 years).
Overall, episodes of spontaneous bleeding declined 90%. The use of factor IX replacement therapy dropped about 92% in the first 12 months after treatment with scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco.
In the 6 participants who received the highest dose of therapy, factor IX levels increased from less than 1% of normal levels to 5% or more.
The increase transformed their disease from severe to mild and enabled participation in sports such as soccer without the need for factor IX replacement therapy or an increase in the risk of bleeding.
Episodes of spontaneous bleeding and the use of factor IX replacement therapy declined for these patients more than 94% in the next 12 months.
Liver enzymes rose in 4 of the 6 patients who received the highest dose of scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco, possibly due to an immune response against the vector. The men had no symptoms and remained otherwise healthy. Their liver enzymes returned to the normal range following brief treatment with steroids.
“This study provides the first clear demonstration of the long-term safety and efficacy of gene therapy,” said study author Andrew Davidoff, MD, of St Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.
“The results so far have made a profound difference in the lives of study participants by dramatically reducing their risk of bleeding.”
Prior to receiving scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco, 7 of the men received factor IX replacement therapy at least once a week to prevent bleeding episodes. Others used replacement therapy as needed to halt bleeding or prior to surgeries.
Since joining the trial, 4 of these men ended the routine factor IX injections. And none have suffered spontaneous bleeding despite increased physical activity.
“Some patients have not required clotting factor injections for more than 4 years, which has been life-changing,” Dr Nathwani said.
The researchers estimated that overall spending on factor IX replacement therapy for study participants is down more than $2.5 million.
Twelve men have now joined this ongoing phase 1/2 trial. Half were treated at the University College London and half at St. Jude.
Discussions are underway about expanding the trial to include younger patients with hemophilia B. Meanwhile, work continues to improve and expand use of the vector for the treatment of hemophilia A.
Credit: University College
London Hospitals
A novel gene therapy can provide lasting clinical improvement for men with severe hemophilia B, according to research published in NEJM.
In a study of 10 men, the therapy increased factor IX levels, reduced bleeding episodes, and decreased the use of prophylactic factor IX concentrate. The therapy also allowed some patients to adopt a more active lifestyle.
Four patients experienced temporary increases in liver enzymes, but none reported late toxic effects at a median follow-up of 3 years.
“The data we are reporting mark a paradigm shift in treatment of hemophilia B and lay the groundwork for curing this major bleeding disorder,” said study author Amit Nathwani, MBChB, PhD, of the University College London Cancer Institute in the UK.
“The results also provide a solid platform for developing this gene transfer approach for treatment of other disorders, ranging from other congenital clotting deficiencies like hemophilia A to inborn errors of metabolism such as phenylketonuria.”
The therapy consists of a serotype 8 pseudotyped, self-complementary adeno-associated virus (AAV8) vector expressing a codon-optimized factor IX transgene (scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco).
Dr Nathwani and his colleagues tested scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco in 10 men with severe hemophilia B to determine the durability of transgene expression, the vector dose-response relationship, and the level of persistent or late toxicity.
Six of the patients had been enrolled in a phase 1 dose-escalation trial, with 2 patients each receiving a low, intermediate, or high dose of the therapy. The other 4 patients received the high dose (2 × 1012 vector genomes per kg of body weight). Patients received scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco as a single infusion.
Factor IX levels rose in all 10 men following the infusion and have remained stable for a median of 3.2 years (range, 1.5 to 4.3 years).
Overall, episodes of spontaneous bleeding declined 90%. The use of factor IX replacement therapy dropped about 92% in the first 12 months after treatment with scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco.
In the 6 participants who received the highest dose of therapy, factor IX levels increased from less than 1% of normal levels to 5% or more.
The increase transformed their disease from severe to mild and enabled participation in sports such as soccer without the need for factor IX replacement therapy or an increase in the risk of bleeding.
Episodes of spontaneous bleeding and the use of factor IX replacement therapy declined for these patients more than 94% in the next 12 months.
Liver enzymes rose in 4 of the 6 patients who received the highest dose of scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco, possibly due to an immune response against the vector. The men had no symptoms and remained otherwise healthy. Their liver enzymes returned to the normal range following brief treatment with steroids.
“This study provides the first clear demonstration of the long-term safety and efficacy of gene therapy,” said study author Andrew Davidoff, MD, of St Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.
“The results so far have made a profound difference in the lives of study participants by dramatically reducing their risk of bleeding.”
Prior to receiving scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco, 7 of the men received factor IX replacement therapy at least once a week to prevent bleeding episodes. Others used replacement therapy as needed to halt bleeding or prior to surgeries.
Since joining the trial, 4 of these men ended the routine factor IX injections. And none have suffered spontaneous bleeding despite increased physical activity.
“Some patients have not required clotting factor injections for more than 4 years, which has been life-changing,” Dr Nathwani said.
The researchers estimated that overall spending on factor IX replacement therapy for study participants is down more than $2.5 million.
Twelve men have now joined this ongoing phase 1/2 trial. Half were treated at the University College London and half at St. Jude.
Discussions are underway about expanding the trial to include younger patients with hemophilia B. Meanwhile, work continues to improve and expand use of the vector for the treatment of hemophilia A.
Credit: University College
London Hospitals
A novel gene therapy can provide lasting clinical improvement for men with severe hemophilia B, according to research published in NEJM.
In a study of 10 men, the therapy increased factor IX levels, reduced bleeding episodes, and decreased the use of prophylactic factor IX concentrate. The therapy also allowed some patients to adopt a more active lifestyle.
Four patients experienced temporary increases in liver enzymes, but none reported late toxic effects at a median follow-up of 3 years.
“The data we are reporting mark a paradigm shift in treatment of hemophilia B and lay the groundwork for curing this major bleeding disorder,” said study author Amit Nathwani, MBChB, PhD, of the University College London Cancer Institute in the UK.
“The results also provide a solid platform for developing this gene transfer approach for treatment of other disorders, ranging from other congenital clotting deficiencies like hemophilia A to inborn errors of metabolism such as phenylketonuria.”
The therapy consists of a serotype 8 pseudotyped, self-complementary adeno-associated virus (AAV8) vector expressing a codon-optimized factor IX transgene (scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco).
Dr Nathwani and his colleagues tested scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco in 10 men with severe hemophilia B to determine the durability of transgene expression, the vector dose-response relationship, and the level of persistent or late toxicity.
Six of the patients had been enrolled in a phase 1 dose-escalation trial, with 2 patients each receiving a low, intermediate, or high dose of the therapy. The other 4 patients received the high dose (2 × 1012 vector genomes per kg of body weight). Patients received scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco as a single infusion.
Factor IX levels rose in all 10 men following the infusion and have remained stable for a median of 3.2 years (range, 1.5 to 4.3 years).
Overall, episodes of spontaneous bleeding declined 90%. The use of factor IX replacement therapy dropped about 92% in the first 12 months after treatment with scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco.
In the 6 participants who received the highest dose of therapy, factor IX levels increased from less than 1% of normal levels to 5% or more.
The increase transformed their disease from severe to mild and enabled participation in sports such as soccer without the need for factor IX replacement therapy or an increase in the risk of bleeding.
Episodes of spontaneous bleeding and the use of factor IX replacement therapy declined for these patients more than 94% in the next 12 months.
Liver enzymes rose in 4 of the 6 patients who received the highest dose of scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco, possibly due to an immune response against the vector. The men had no symptoms and remained otherwise healthy. Their liver enzymes returned to the normal range following brief treatment with steroids.
“This study provides the first clear demonstration of the long-term safety and efficacy of gene therapy,” said study author Andrew Davidoff, MD, of St Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.
“The results so far have made a profound difference in the lives of study participants by dramatically reducing their risk of bleeding.”
Prior to receiving scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco, 7 of the men received factor IX replacement therapy at least once a week to prevent bleeding episodes. Others used replacement therapy as needed to halt bleeding or prior to surgeries.
Since joining the trial, 4 of these men ended the routine factor IX injections. And none have suffered spontaneous bleeding despite increased physical activity.
“Some patients have not required clotting factor injections for more than 4 years, which has been life-changing,” Dr Nathwani said.
The researchers estimated that overall spending on factor IX replacement therapy for study participants is down more than $2.5 million.
Twelve men have now joined this ongoing phase 1/2 trial. Half were treated at the University College London and half at St. Jude.
Discussions are underway about expanding the trial to include younger patients with hemophilia B. Meanwhile, work continues to improve and expand use of the vector for the treatment of hemophilia A.
Hydroxyurea proves comparable to transfusion in SCD
Credit: St Jude Children’s
Research Hospital
Treatment with hydroxyurea is a comparable alternative to blood transfusions for reducing the risk of stroke in children with sickle cell disease (SCD), according to the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
Early results of the phase 3 TWiTCH trial showed that daily doses of hydroxyurea lower the transcranial Doppler (TCD) blood velocity in children with SCD to a similar degree as blood transfusions, thereby decreasing the risk of stroke.
Based on these findings, the NHLBI has terminated the trial early, about a year before it was originally scheduled to end.
“Early results indicate that TWiTCH is a success,” said Russell E. Ware, MD, PhD, principal investigator of the study and director of hematology at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.
“A group of outside experts has been reviewing the TWiTCH data every few months to ensure the safety of children in the clinical trial and to monitor the data. This group met recently and, after careful consideration of the interim data results, recommended that the study be stopped since hydroxyurea worked as well as transfusions to lower TCD velocities.”
The NHLBI said it cannot release results from the TWiTCH trial, but some details are available. Researchers enrolled 121 children between the ages of 4 and 16 who had SCD and abnormally elevated TCD velocities.
Half of patients received transfusions, and the other half received daily hydroxyurea, which has not yet been approved for children with SCD.
The clinical data-collection portion of the study was originally scheduled for the 24-month mark, but collection was stopped after only half of the children completed the treatment phase.
At the first interim analysis, a data and safety monitoring board found that hydroxyurea was not inferior to regular blood transfusions in lowering TCD velocities. And the board said the strength of the statistical finding was unlikely to change with the collection of additional data.
After reviewing the board’s recommendation, the NHLBI decided to end the study early, as the primary endpoint had been met.
Study participants have been notified about the trial’s ending, and they will have the opportunity to receive the care they feel is best suited for them.
“No child should ever suffer a stroke, which is why it was so important for the NHLBI to support the TWiTCH trial,” said Gary Gibbons, MD, director of the NHLBI. “This critical research finding opens the door to more treatment options for clinicians trying to prevent strokes in children living with the sickle cell disease.”
Credit: St Jude Children’s
Research Hospital
Treatment with hydroxyurea is a comparable alternative to blood transfusions for reducing the risk of stroke in children with sickle cell disease (SCD), according to the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
Early results of the phase 3 TWiTCH trial showed that daily doses of hydroxyurea lower the transcranial Doppler (TCD) blood velocity in children with SCD to a similar degree as blood transfusions, thereby decreasing the risk of stroke.
Based on these findings, the NHLBI has terminated the trial early, about a year before it was originally scheduled to end.
“Early results indicate that TWiTCH is a success,” said Russell E. Ware, MD, PhD, principal investigator of the study and director of hematology at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.
“A group of outside experts has been reviewing the TWiTCH data every few months to ensure the safety of children in the clinical trial and to monitor the data. This group met recently and, after careful consideration of the interim data results, recommended that the study be stopped since hydroxyurea worked as well as transfusions to lower TCD velocities.”
The NHLBI said it cannot release results from the TWiTCH trial, but some details are available. Researchers enrolled 121 children between the ages of 4 and 16 who had SCD and abnormally elevated TCD velocities.
Half of patients received transfusions, and the other half received daily hydroxyurea, which has not yet been approved for children with SCD.
The clinical data-collection portion of the study was originally scheduled for the 24-month mark, but collection was stopped after only half of the children completed the treatment phase.
At the first interim analysis, a data and safety monitoring board found that hydroxyurea was not inferior to regular blood transfusions in lowering TCD velocities. And the board said the strength of the statistical finding was unlikely to change with the collection of additional data.
After reviewing the board’s recommendation, the NHLBI decided to end the study early, as the primary endpoint had been met.
Study participants have been notified about the trial’s ending, and they will have the opportunity to receive the care they feel is best suited for them.
“No child should ever suffer a stroke, which is why it was so important for the NHLBI to support the TWiTCH trial,” said Gary Gibbons, MD, director of the NHLBI. “This critical research finding opens the door to more treatment options for clinicians trying to prevent strokes in children living with the sickle cell disease.”
Credit: St Jude Children’s
Research Hospital
Treatment with hydroxyurea is a comparable alternative to blood transfusions for reducing the risk of stroke in children with sickle cell disease (SCD), according to the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
Early results of the phase 3 TWiTCH trial showed that daily doses of hydroxyurea lower the transcranial Doppler (TCD) blood velocity in children with SCD to a similar degree as blood transfusions, thereby decreasing the risk of stroke.
Based on these findings, the NHLBI has terminated the trial early, about a year before it was originally scheduled to end.
“Early results indicate that TWiTCH is a success,” said Russell E. Ware, MD, PhD, principal investigator of the study and director of hematology at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.
“A group of outside experts has been reviewing the TWiTCH data every few months to ensure the safety of children in the clinical trial and to monitor the data. This group met recently and, after careful consideration of the interim data results, recommended that the study be stopped since hydroxyurea worked as well as transfusions to lower TCD velocities.”
The NHLBI said it cannot release results from the TWiTCH trial, but some details are available. Researchers enrolled 121 children between the ages of 4 and 16 who had SCD and abnormally elevated TCD velocities.
Half of patients received transfusions, and the other half received daily hydroxyurea, which has not yet been approved for children with SCD.
The clinical data-collection portion of the study was originally scheduled for the 24-month mark, but collection was stopped after only half of the children completed the treatment phase.
At the first interim analysis, a data and safety monitoring board found that hydroxyurea was not inferior to regular blood transfusions in lowering TCD velocities. And the board said the strength of the statistical finding was unlikely to change with the collection of additional data.
After reviewing the board’s recommendation, the NHLBI decided to end the study early, as the primary endpoint had been met.
Study participants have been notified about the trial’s ending, and they will have the opportunity to receive the care they feel is best suited for them.
“No child should ever suffer a stroke, which is why it was so important for the NHLBI to support the TWiTCH trial,” said Gary Gibbons, MD, director of the NHLBI. “This critical research finding opens the door to more treatment options for clinicians trying to prevent strokes in children living with the sickle cell disease.”
EZH2 inhibitor is active in NHL with wild-type EZH2
BARCELONA—A small molecule inhibitor of EZH2 has shown “encouraging” activity in patients with advanced non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to researchers.
In a phase 1 study, 4 of 10 heavily pretreated NHL patients responded to the drug, E7438 (also known as EPZ6438), with 1 patient achieving a complete response.
And E7438’s activity was not dependent upon the presence of an EZH2 mutation, as all 4 patients had wild-type EZH2.
The drug also demonstrated activity in a patient with a malignant rhabdoid tumor in the brain.
“In this study, responses were seen in patients with lymphoma who were refractory to, or relapsed after, prior standard treatments, as well as in a patient with a malignant disease for which there is no available standard medical treatment [rhabdoid tumor in the brain],” said study investigator Vincent Ribrag, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France.
Dr Ribrag and his colleagues also found E7438 to be well-tolerated. There were no grade 3 adverse events and only 1 grade 4 event at the maximum dose level.
The researchers presented these data at the 26th EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics as abstract LBA6. Investigators from Esai and Epizyme, the companies developing E7438, were involved in this trial.
The study included 24 patients who ranged in age from 24 to 84. Twelve patients had solid tumor malignancies, and 12 had NHL. Six patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 5 had follicular lymphoma (FL), and 1 had marginal zone lymphoma.
All of the patients were heavily pretreated. Fourteen had received between 2 and 4 prior therapies, and 9 had received more than 4 prior treatments.
E7438 was given in 5 dosing cohorts: 100 mg BID (n=6), 200 mg BID (n=3), 400 mg BID (n=3), 800 mg BID (n=6), and 1600 mg BID (n=6).
‘Encouraging activity’
Twenty patients were evaluable for efficacy as of October 20. Among the 10 patients with solid tumor malignancies, 1 responded. The patient with an INI1-deficient malignant rhabdoid tumor achieved a partial response and remains on study.
Four of the 10 evaluable NHL patients achieved a partial response or better, including 1 complete response. Responses were seen across a range of doses, up to the 800 mg BID dose.
Among the 5 evaluable DLBCL patients, 3 achieved a partial response or better. One patient with a partial response subsequently evolved to a complete response upon continued treatment and remains on study at 41 weeks of treatment. One of the 2 patients who achieved a partial response remains on study.
Among the 4 evaluable patients with FL, 1 achieved a partial response and remains on study. Three FL patients achieved stable disease, and 2 of these patients remain on study.
The patient with marginal zone lymphoma achieved stable disease and remains on study.
Confirmatory sequencing in a central lab showed that all 10 NHL patients who were evaluable for efficacy had wild-type EZH2, and responses were observed in both germinal center and non-germinal center lymphoma.
“These results provide encouraging evidence of antitumor activity with [E7438] . . . , including the potential for responses to improve with continued treatment,” said Peter Ho, MD, PhD, chief development officer at Epizyme.
“Given the clinical activity we saw in both wild-type EZH2 and non-germinal center lymphoma patients, our plan for the first phase 2 NHL study is to evaluate EPZ-6438 in DLBCL and FL patients with and without EZH2 mutations.”
‘Little toxicity’
All 24 patients were evaluable for safety and tolerability. The majority of adverse events were grade 1 or 2. Events occurring in more than 10% of patients included asthenia, decreased appetite, and nausea.
The only grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event was grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 1 patient who received the drug at 1600 mg, which met the criteria for a dose-limiting toxicity.
There were no adverse events that required treatment withdrawal or dose reduction. However, 3 events resulted in dose interruption.
“The maximum tolerated dose was not reached because there was little toxicity observed,” Dr Ribrag said. “Since we saw that the drug was active at doses lower than the maximum dose of 1600 mg twice a day, the dose used for the phase 2 trials planned for 2015 may be lower.”
E7438 was rapidly absorbed and eliminated, with a terminal half-life of 3 to 6 hours. In addition, H3K27Me3 inhibition in the skin, a marker of biologic activity, correlated to treatment exposure, with near maximal inhibition predicted by pharmacokinetic exposure at 800 mg.
Currently, a phase 2 dose of 800 mg BID is under consideration. A final recommendation for the phase 2 dose will be approved by a data monitoring committee based on efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters.
BARCELONA—A small molecule inhibitor of EZH2 has shown “encouraging” activity in patients with advanced non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to researchers.
In a phase 1 study, 4 of 10 heavily pretreated NHL patients responded to the drug, E7438 (also known as EPZ6438), with 1 patient achieving a complete response.
And E7438’s activity was not dependent upon the presence of an EZH2 mutation, as all 4 patients had wild-type EZH2.
The drug also demonstrated activity in a patient with a malignant rhabdoid tumor in the brain.
“In this study, responses were seen in patients with lymphoma who were refractory to, or relapsed after, prior standard treatments, as well as in a patient with a malignant disease for which there is no available standard medical treatment [rhabdoid tumor in the brain],” said study investigator Vincent Ribrag, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France.
Dr Ribrag and his colleagues also found E7438 to be well-tolerated. There were no grade 3 adverse events and only 1 grade 4 event at the maximum dose level.
The researchers presented these data at the 26th EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics as abstract LBA6. Investigators from Esai and Epizyme, the companies developing E7438, were involved in this trial.
The study included 24 patients who ranged in age from 24 to 84. Twelve patients had solid tumor malignancies, and 12 had NHL. Six patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 5 had follicular lymphoma (FL), and 1 had marginal zone lymphoma.
All of the patients were heavily pretreated. Fourteen had received between 2 and 4 prior therapies, and 9 had received more than 4 prior treatments.
E7438 was given in 5 dosing cohorts: 100 mg BID (n=6), 200 mg BID (n=3), 400 mg BID (n=3), 800 mg BID (n=6), and 1600 mg BID (n=6).
‘Encouraging activity’
Twenty patients were evaluable for efficacy as of October 20. Among the 10 patients with solid tumor malignancies, 1 responded. The patient with an INI1-deficient malignant rhabdoid tumor achieved a partial response and remains on study.
Four of the 10 evaluable NHL patients achieved a partial response or better, including 1 complete response. Responses were seen across a range of doses, up to the 800 mg BID dose.
Among the 5 evaluable DLBCL patients, 3 achieved a partial response or better. One patient with a partial response subsequently evolved to a complete response upon continued treatment and remains on study at 41 weeks of treatment. One of the 2 patients who achieved a partial response remains on study.
Among the 4 evaluable patients with FL, 1 achieved a partial response and remains on study. Three FL patients achieved stable disease, and 2 of these patients remain on study.
The patient with marginal zone lymphoma achieved stable disease and remains on study.
Confirmatory sequencing in a central lab showed that all 10 NHL patients who were evaluable for efficacy had wild-type EZH2, and responses were observed in both germinal center and non-germinal center lymphoma.
“These results provide encouraging evidence of antitumor activity with [E7438] . . . , including the potential for responses to improve with continued treatment,” said Peter Ho, MD, PhD, chief development officer at Epizyme.
“Given the clinical activity we saw in both wild-type EZH2 and non-germinal center lymphoma patients, our plan for the first phase 2 NHL study is to evaluate EPZ-6438 in DLBCL and FL patients with and without EZH2 mutations.”
‘Little toxicity’
All 24 patients were evaluable for safety and tolerability. The majority of adverse events were grade 1 or 2. Events occurring in more than 10% of patients included asthenia, decreased appetite, and nausea.
The only grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event was grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 1 patient who received the drug at 1600 mg, which met the criteria for a dose-limiting toxicity.
There were no adverse events that required treatment withdrawal or dose reduction. However, 3 events resulted in dose interruption.
“The maximum tolerated dose was not reached because there was little toxicity observed,” Dr Ribrag said. “Since we saw that the drug was active at doses lower than the maximum dose of 1600 mg twice a day, the dose used for the phase 2 trials planned for 2015 may be lower.”
E7438 was rapidly absorbed and eliminated, with a terminal half-life of 3 to 6 hours. In addition, H3K27Me3 inhibition in the skin, a marker of biologic activity, correlated to treatment exposure, with near maximal inhibition predicted by pharmacokinetic exposure at 800 mg.
Currently, a phase 2 dose of 800 mg BID is under consideration. A final recommendation for the phase 2 dose will be approved by a data monitoring committee based on efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters.
BARCELONA—A small molecule inhibitor of EZH2 has shown “encouraging” activity in patients with advanced non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to researchers.
In a phase 1 study, 4 of 10 heavily pretreated NHL patients responded to the drug, E7438 (also known as EPZ6438), with 1 patient achieving a complete response.
And E7438’s activity was not dependent upon the presence of an EZH2 mutation, as all 4 patients had wild-type EZH2.
The drug also demonstrated activity in a patient with a malignant rhabdoid tumor in the brain.
“In this study, responses were seen in patients with lymphoma who were refractory to, or relapsed after, prior standard treatments, as well as in a patient with a malignant disease for which there is no available standard medical treatment [rhabdoid tumor in the brain],” said study investigator Vincent Ribrag, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France.
Dr Ribrag and his colleagues also found E7438 to be well-tolerated. There were no grade 3 adverse events and only 1 grade 4 event at the maximum dose level.
The researchers presented these data at the 26th EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics as abstract LBA6. Investigators from Esai and Epizyme, the companies developing E7438, were involved in this trial.
The study included 24 patients who ranged in age from 24 to 84. Twelve patients had solid tumor malignancies, and 12 had NHL. Six patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 5 had follicular lymphoma (FL), and 1 had marginal zone lymphoma.
All of the patients were heavily pretreated. Fourteen had received between 2 and 4 prior therapies, and 9 had received more than 4 prior treatments.
E7438 was given in 5 dosing cohorts: 100 mg BID (n=6), 200 mg BID (n=3), 400 mg BID (n=3), 800 mg BID (n=6), and 1600 mg BID (n=6).
‘Encouraging activity’
Twenty patients were evaluable for efficacy as of October 20. Among the 10 patients with solid tumor malignancies, 1 responded. The patient with an INI1-deficient malignant rhabdoid tumor achieved a partial response and remains on study.
Four of the 10 evaluable NHL patients achieved a partial response or better, including 1 complete response. Responses were seen across a range of doses, up to the 800 mg BID dose.
Among the 5 evaluable DLBCL patients, 3 achieved a partial response or better. One patient with a partial response subsequently evolved to a complete response upon continued treatment and remains on study at 41 weeks of treatment. One of the 2 patients who achieved a partial response remains on study.
Among the 4 evaluable patients with FL, 1 achieved a partial response and remains on study. Three FL patients achieved stable disease, and 2 of these patients remain on study.
The patient with marginal zone lymphoma achieved stable disease and remains on study.
Confirmatory sequencing in a central lab showed that all 10 NHL patients who were evaluable for efficacy had wild-type EZH2, and responses were observed in both germinal center and non-germinal center lymphoma.
“These results provide encouraging evidence of antitumor activity with [E7438] . . . , including the potential for responses to improve with continued treatment,” said Peter Ho, MD, PhD, chief development officer at Epizyme.
“Given the clinical activity we saw in both wild-type EZH2 and non-germinal center lymphoma patients, our plan for the first phase 2 NHL study is to evaluate EPZ-6438 in DLBCL and FL patients with and without EZH2 mutations.”
‘Little toxicity’
All 24 patients were evaluable for safety and tolerability. The majority of adverse events were grade 1 or 2. Events occurring in more than 10% of patients included asthenia, decreased appetite, and nausea.
The only grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event was grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 1 patient who received the drug at 1600 mg, which met the criteria for a dose-limiting toxicity.
There were no adverse events that required treatment withdrawal or dose reduction. However, 3 events resulted in dose interruption.
“The maximum tolerated dose was not reached because there was little toxicity observed,” Dr Ribrag said. “Since we saw that the drug was active at doses lower than the maximum dose of 1600 mg twice a day, the dose used for the phase 2 trials planned for 2015 may be lower.”
E7438 was rapidly absorbed and eliminated, with a terminal half-life of 3 to 6 hours. In addition, H3K27Me3 inhibition in the skin, a marker of biologic activity, correlated to treatment exposure, with near maximal inhibition predicted by pharmacokinetic exposure at 800 mg.
Currently, a phase 2 dose of 800 mg BID is under consideration. A final recommendation for the phase 2 dose will be approved by a data monitoring committee based on efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters.
FDA grants drug orphan designation for AML
Credit: Lance Liotta
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation for the Axl inhibitor BGB324 to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
BGB324 is a highly selective small molecule inhibitor of the Axl receptor tyrosine kinase. It blocks the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, a key driver in drug resistance and metastasis.
BerGenBio, the company developing BGB324, has estimated that more than 50% of AML patients have elevated levels of Axl.
And a study published in Blood last year showed that Axl inhibition by BGB324 prompts antileukemic activity in FLT3-mutated and FLT3-wild-type AML.
Earlier this month, BerGenBio said the first patient had been dosed in its multicenter phase 1b trial of BGB324 in patients with AML.
The primary goal of this 2-part trial is to investigate the safety and tolerability of BGB324 as a single agent and in combination with cytarabine. Secondary endpoints include clinical response and assessment of novel biomarkers.
The study will be conducted at 6 sites in Norway, Germany, and the US. BerGenBio expects data from this trial to be available in 2015.
The FDA’s orphan designation will provide BerGenBio with access to various development incentives for BGB324.
This includes tax credits for qualified clinical testing, exemption from prescription drug user fees for BGB324 in AML, and 7 years of market exclusivity in the US upon FDA approval.
Credit: Lance Liotta
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation for the Axl inhibitor BGB324 to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
BGB324 is a highly selective small molecule inhibitor of the Axl receptor tyrosine kinase. It blocks the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, a key driver in drug resistance and metastasis.
BerGenBio, the company developing BGB324, has estimated that more than 50% of AML patients have elevated levels of Axl.
And a study published in Blood last year showed that Axl inhibition by BGB324 prompts antileukemic activity in FLT3-mutated and FLT3-wild-type AML.
Earlier this month, BerGenBio said the first patient had been dosed in its multicenter phase 1b trial of BGB324 in patients with AML.
The primary goal of this 2-part trial is to investigate the safety and tolerability of BGB324 as a single agent and in combination with cytarabine. Secondary endpoints include clinical response and assessment of novel biomarkers.
The study will be conducted at 6 sites in Norway, Germany, and the US. BerGenBio expects data from this trial to be available in 2015.
The FDA’s orphan designation will provide BerGenBio with access to various development incentives for BGB324.
This includes tax credits for qualified clinical testing, exemption from prescription drug user fees for BGB324 in AML, and 7 years of market exclusivity in the US upon FDA approval.
Credit: Lance Liotta
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation for the Axl inhibitor BGB324 to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
BGB324 is a highly selective small molecule inhibitor of the Axl receptor tyrosine kinase. It blocks the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, a key driver in drug resistance and metastasis.
BerGenBio, the company developing BGB324, has estimated that more than 50% of AML patients have elevated levels of Axl.
And a study published in Blood last year showed that Axl inhibition by BGB324 prompts antileukemic activity in FLT3-mutated and FLT3-wild-type AML.
Earlier this month, BerGenBio said the first patient had been dosed in its multicenter phase 1b trial of BGB324 in patients with AML.
The primary goal of this 2-part trial is to investigate the safety and tolerability of BGB324 as a single agent and in combination with cytarabine. Secondary endpoints include clinical response and assessment of novel biomarkers.
The study will be conducted at 6 sites in Norway, Germany, and the US. BerGenBio expects data from this trial to be available in 2015.
The FDA’s orphan designation will provide BerGenBio with access to various development incentives for BGB324.
This includes tax credits for qualified clinical testing, exemption from prescription drug user fees for BGB324 in AML, and 7 years of market exclusivity in the US upon FDA approval.