User login
Coronary Artery Calcifications
Supplement Editor:
Vincent W. Dennis, MD
Contents
Medical logic and coronary calcifications
V.W. Dennis, MD
Noninvasive quantification of coronary artery calcification: Methods and prognostic value
S.S. Halliburton, PhD; A.E. Stillman, MD, PhD; and R.D. White, MD
Coronary artery calcification and end-stage renal disease: Vascular biology and clinical implications
P. Schoenhagen, MD, and E.M. Tuzcu, MD
Cardiovascular mortality in chronic renal failure: Hyperphosphatemia, coronary calcification, and the role of phosphate binders
R.A. Fatica, MD, and V.W. Dennis, MD
Supplement Editor:
Vincent W. Dennis, MD
Contents
Medical logic and coronary calcifications
V.W. Dennis, MD
Noninvasive quantification of coronary artery calcification: Methods and prognostic value
S.S. Halliburton, PhD; A.E. Stillman, MD, PhD; and R.D. White, MD
Coronary artery calcification and end-stage renal disease: Vascular biology and clinical implications
P. Schoenhagen, MD, and E.M. Tuzcu, MD
Cardiovascular mortality in chronic renal failure: Hyperphosphatemia, coronary calcification, and the role of phosphate binders
R.A. Fatica, MD, and V.W. Dennis, MD
Supplement Editor:
Vincent W. Dennis, MD
Contents
Medical logic and coronary calcifications
V.W. Dennis, MD
Noninvasive quantification of coronary artery calcification: Methods and prognostic value
S.S. Halliburton, PhD; A.E. Stillman, MD, PhD; and R.D. White, MD
Coronary artery calcification and end-stage renal disease: Vascular biology and clinical implications
P. Schoenhagen, MD, and E.M. Tuzcu, MD
Cardiovascular mortality in chronic renal failure: Hyperphosphatemia, coronary calcification, and the role of phosphate binders
R.A. Fatica, MD, and V.W. Dennis, MD
CME good and bad news: Now 1.5 hours, but you must go online
Lumbar canal stenosis: Start with nonsurgical therapy
Bariatric surgery for morbid obesity: Why, who, when, how, where, and then what?
Very-low-carbohydrate weight-loss diets revisited
Making good decisions about diet: Weight loss is not weight maintenance
Discussing breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy with women
Erratum (2002;70:185-192)
How to control migraines in patients with psychiatric disorders
Many of the 28 million people who suffer from migraine headaches each year1 need psychiatric care in addition to headache relief. Migraine headaches often coexist with depression,2 anxiety/panic disorders,2,3 bipolar disorder,4 and phobias,5 as well as with stroke6 and epilepsy.7 A study of 995 young adults found that anxiety disorders, phobias, major depression, panic disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder were two to five times more prevalent among migraine sufferers than among a control group (Table 1 ).2
Migraine sufferers know that at any time an attack could hamper their ability to work, care for their families, or engage in social activities. A nationwide study of migraineurs found that attacks often impaired their relationships with family and friends.8
Psychiatrists should screen patients for a history of migraine or other headaches and carefully consider the relationship between migraines and psychiatric disorders when prescribing treatment. In this article, we outline acute and preventive headache treatments and present two cases to help you treat these patients appropriately.
Table 1
PSYCHIATRIC COMORBIDITIES IN PATIENTS WITH VS. WITHOUT MIGRAINES*
| Migraineurs (%) (n = 128) | Controls (%) (n = 879) | |
|---|---|---|
| Any anxiety | 54 | 27 |
| Generalized anxiety disorder | 10 | 2 |
| Phobia | 40 | 21 |
| Major depression | 35 | 10 |
| Panic disorder | 11 | 2 |
| Obsessive-compulsive disorder | 9 | 2 |
| * Prevalence Source: Breslau N, Davis GC. Cephalalgia 1992;12(2):85-90. | ||
Table 2
THREE TYPES OF PRIMARY HEADACHE: DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
| Headache type | Age of onset (years) | Location | Duration | Frequency/timing | Severity | Quality | Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Migraine | 10 to 40 | Hemicranial | 4 to 72 hr | Variable | Moderate to severe | Throbbing, steady ache | Nausea; vomiting; photo/phono/osmophobia; neurologic deficits; aura |
| Tension-type | 20 to 50 | Bilateral/generalized | 30 min to 7 days+ | Variable | Dull ache, may wax and wane | Tight, band-like pressure | Generally none |
| Cluster | 15 to 40 | Unilateral, periorbital or retro-orbital | 15 to 180 min | 1 to 8 times per day or night | Excruciating | Boring, piercing | Ipsilateral, conjunctival injection, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, miosis, facial seating |
| Source: Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 1988;8(suppl 7):1-96. | |||||||
Headache definitions and diagnosis
Primary or secondary. Under the International Headache Society’s (IHS) 1988 headache classification and diagnostic criteria,9 headaches are primary or secondary:
- Primary headaches are benign recurrent headaches that commonly present in practice.
- Secondary headaches occur much less frequently and are caused by underlying pathology.
The possibility of secondary headache should be ruled out before a primary headache can be diagnosed. The following headache features should cause concern:
- Severe headache with abrupt onset
- Subacute or progressive headache over days or months
- Headache, nausea, vomiting, and fever not explained by systemic illness
- New-onset headache late in life
- Headache with neurologic signs or symptoms such as confusion, decreased level of consciousness, meningismus, or papilledema
- Headache following head trauma
- Patient history of sickle cell disease, malignancy, or HIV.
Headache types. The three major types of primary headache are migraine, tension-type, and cluster (Table 2 ). Tension-type is the most common, is often mild, and is either self-treated with over-the-counter medications or ignored. Migraine is the most troublesome headache in everyday practice. Cluster is the most severe and fortunately is rare.
Migraine with aura and migraine without aura are separate diagnoses. IHS criteria for diagnosing migraines without aura are listed in Table 3. According to the IHS, migraine with aura (or “classic migraine”) fulfills all the criteria for migraine without aura, with fully reversible neurologic symptoms indicating focal cerebral cortical and/or brain stem dysfunction.
Auras. About 15% of migraineurs experience auras. Symptoms develop within 5 to 20 minutes, usually last less than 1 hour, and fade before the headache’s onset. Gradual onset and history of previous attacks helps to distinguish aura from transient ischemic attacks. Auras may manifest as visual, sensory, motor, or brain-stem symptoms, or as combinations of these:
- Visual auras are most common, presenting as localized visual loss (scotoma), with flashing lights (scintillation) at margins or jagged edges (fortification).
- Sensory auras present as facial or limb paresthesias.
- Motor auras manifest as weakness or lack of coordination.
- Brain stem auras manifest as vertigo or double vision.
Migraine aura is considered part of the headache’s prodrome, which may occur days or hours before the headache’s onset. The aura may bring about:
- an altered mental state (e.g., depression, hyperactivity, euphoria, difficulty concentrating, dysphasia)
- neurologic symptoms (e.g., photophobia, phonophobia, hyperosmia, yawning)
- general bodily discomforts (e.g., anorexia, food craving, diarrhea, thirst, urination, fluid retention, cold feeling).
Despite their sometimes severe effects, migraines often remain undiagnosed.10 Migraine should be suspected in patients with recurrent moderate to severe disabling headaches (Box).11-15
Case 1: “Bad, sick headaches”
Ms. A, 23, a single parent with a 2-year-old child, has had trouble staying employed because of repeated illnesses. She made 17 visits to her primary care physician within 26 months. While her main complaint was headache, she also complained of other aches and pains, a lack of energy, and insomnia. Numerous examinations revealed no physical abnormalities.
She reported having “bad, sick headaches” that sometimes lasted 2 to 3 days. Bed rest helped but this was not always possible. The headache was throbbing and usually one-sided. She had no aura, and ibuprofen gave partial relief. She noted that her mother gets similar headaches.
Table 3
DIAGNOSTIC REQUIREMENTS FOR MIGRAINE WITHOUT AURA
Mandatory
|
At least 2 of the following:
|
| During headache At least one of the following:
|
| Additional features Migraine prodrome—A range of general, neurologic, and mental changes may occur hours or days before the headache’s onset General—Anorexia, food craving, diarrhea or constipation, thirst, urination, fluid retention, cold feeling Mental—Depression, hyperactivity, euphoria, difficulty concentrating, dysphasia Neurologic—Photophobia, phonophobia, hyperosmia, yawning |
| SOURCE: Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 1988;8(suppl 7):1-96. |
Ms. A was diagnosed with migraine without aura, and she was treated with sumatriptan, 100 mg (1 or 2 doses, as needed). Her headaches responded well to this treatment, but the frequency of attacks remained unchanged. She requested a change in her medicine.
The underlying mechanisms of migraine headaches are not completely understood.
Vascular causes. A recently described neurovascular mechanism11 suggests that perivascular neurogenic inflammation involving meningeal vessels causes migraine. The triptan drugs have been found to reverse this process and relieve the headache.12
Positron emission tomography has demonstrated increased blood flow during acute migraine in midline brain stem structures. This suggests the presence of a central migraine generator in that location.13
Heredity. A rare form of migraine, familial hemiplegic migraine, is associated with a genetic abnormality on chromosome 19.14
Nitric oxide. Nitroglycerine-induced migraine headache, caused by the release of nitric oxide in cerebral vessels, can be reversed by nitrous oxide synthase inhibitors, thus opening up intriguing possibilities of new therapeutic agents and increased understanding of underlying migraine mechanisms.15
Treating migraines
Acute treatment. Migraineurs whose attacks are infrequent and mild may find OTC analgesics or NSAIDs adequate. Most patients, however, require specific migraine treatment, usually with triptans. Acute oral treatment options include sumatriptan, 50 to 100 mg; rizatriptan, 10 mg; zolmitriptan, 2.5 to 5 mg; and eletriptan, 40 mg.
In case of vomiting or nausea, options include sumatriptan, 20 mg nasal spray or 6 mg SC; rizatriptan, 10 mg on a dissolving wafer; or dihydroergotamine, 2 mg nasal spray or 1 mg IM or SC. For severe nausea or vomiting, an anti-nauseant (e.g., prochlorperazine suppositories, 25 mg) may be of value.
Preventive treatment. Preventive treatment may be warranted, depending on attack frequency, severity, and the extent of disability caused. One prolonged, severe attack per month that responds poorly to acute treatment may indicate the need for preventive treatment. A range of preventative treatments is available (Table 4).
In Ms. A’s case, oral sumatriptan lessened the severity of the migraine attacks, and the addition of nortriptyline, 50 mg/d, reduced frequency by about 50%. She felt more energetic overall and was sleeping better.
Treating the psychiatric comorbidity
Behavioral therapy is used as an adjunct to pharmacologic headache treatment. This approach is usually considered after a poor or adverse response to treatment, or when pharmacologic treatment is contraindicated (e.g., during pregnancy).
Relaxation training, biofeedback, and cognitive-behavioral stress management are the most commonly used forms of behavioral therapy. Thirty-five to 55% improvement in migraine has been reported following such treatments.16
Cognitive-behavioral intervention has been shown to be effective in depression17 and anxiety disorders.18 When either psychiatric problem is comorbid with migraine, cognitive therapy can improve both the migraine and the psychiatric comorbidity.
Pharmacologic therapy. Depression is commonly associated with migraine and may be caused by living with chronic disabling headaches over time. In such cases, the depression will improve as the migraine responds to treatment. However, in cases where comorbid depression or anxiety trigger or exacerbate acute migraine attacks, neither the migraine nor the psychiatric problem responds until the underlying psychopathology is treated. In such cases, simultaneous psychiatric and migraine pharmacologic treatment is required.
We recommend that you treat the psychiatric comorbidity as it would be treated without a co-existing migraine. Be advised, however, that monoamine oxidase inhibitors are contraindicated in depression during the 2 weeks before treating the comorbid migraine with a triptan. If the patient does not respond or if there is concern regarding possible underlying pathology, consult with a clinician who specializes in headache treatment.
Precipitating and aggravating factors
Headache triggers. Helping patients to recognize headache triggers and aggravating factors is an important element in treating and preventing migraines. Identifying these factors in the patient history can help you establish a diagnosis and implement steps to avoid or reduce attack severity.
Table 4
TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR PREVENTING MIGRAINE ATTACKS
| Drug | Efficacy* | Side effects* | Indications | Contraindications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β blockers | 4+ | 2+ | Hypertension | Depression, asthma, diabetes, hypotension, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease |
| Ca channel blockers | 2+ | 1+ | Hypertension, angina, asthma, migraine aura | Constipation, hypotension |
| Tricyclic antidepressants | 4+ | 2+ | Depression, anxiety disorders, insomnia | Heart block, urinary retention, mania |
| Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors | 2+ | 1+ | Depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder | Mania |
| Monoamine oxidase inhibitors | 4+ | 4+ | Depression | Dietary restrictions |
| Divalproex/valproate | 4+ | 2+ | Epilepsy, anxiety disorders, mania | Liver disease, bleeding disorders, hair loss |
| Naproxen | 2+ | 2+ | Arthritis, other pain disorders | Gastritis, peptic ulcer |
| * Ratings on a scale from 1+ (lowest) to 4+ (highest). Table partially derived from data in: Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Smith, R (eds). Headache in primary care. Oxford, UK: Isis Medical Media, 1999. | ||||
Common migraine headache triggers include menstruation, stress, relaxation after stress, fatigue, too much or too little sleep, skipping meals, weather changes, high humidity, glare and flickering lights, loud or high-pitched noises, smoke or dust, strong perfumes or cooking aromas. Food triggers cause 10% of migraine cases. Chocolate, strong cheeses, red wine, beer, citrus fruits, and foods with monosodium glutamate and nitrate preservatives are common food triggers.
Tension-type headaches are triggered by stress or the end of a stress-filled day. Triggers for cluster-type headaches include alcohol, smoking during the cluster phase, and lying down during an attack.
Case 2: Flying the unfriendly skies
Ms. B, 38, is a mother of three who works as a flight attendant. She is separated from her husband and had filed for divorce because of repeated spousal abuse. She has visited her primary care physician multiple times for migraine, sinus problems, backache, and coccygodynia. Orthopedic and rectal examinations revealed no abnormalities.
Her headaches met the IHS diagnostic criteria for migraine with aura, and these responded well to zolmitriptan, 5 mg. The headaches usually occurred during days off from work, but her sinus problems also led to headaches and nasal stuffiness when she flew. Her headaches eventually occurred almost daily.
Her supervisor was unsympathetic. An otolaryngologist had prescribed decongestants and a course of desensitization, both of which brought only transient relief.
A counselor at work recommended that Ms. B go on sick leave and accept a transfer to a non-flying job. The patient was tearful and felt overwhelmed by her problems. She felt that life was no longer worth living. She agreed to see a psychiatrist, who diagnosed depression and anxiety disorder. The psychiatrist prescribed citalopram, 20 mg/d, and agreed to see her regularly to monitor progress.
Discussion. As a migraineur, Ms. B was at increased risk for depression and anxiety disorders.19 Migraine with aura is associated with an increased lifetime prevalence of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts.20
The exact mechanisms by which migraine and depression are related are unknown. Each disorder increases the risk for developing the other. The specificity of this relationship is strengthened by the fact that depression is not associated with a greater risk of severe nonmigrainous headache, even though a severe nonmigrainous headache may cause depression.21
The patient in case 1 responded well when an antidepressant was added to her treatment. In her case, the diagnosis of a depressive disorder remained an open question. Migraine attacks are known to be associated with mood change, lethargy, and cognitive changes. The picture may be further confounded because migraine without depression responds well to prophylaxis with antidepressants.
The patient in case 2, however, presented with a complex of interrelated headache and psychiatric problems of potentially dangerous proportions. Psychiatric problems in migraineurs may be deep-seated, and these patients may require urgent, specialized attention to avoid further serious disability and a possible tragic outcome.
Related resources
- Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Smith, R, eds. Headache in primary care. Oxford, UK: Isis Medical Media, 1999.
- Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Dalessio DJ. Wolff’s headache and other head pain (7th ed). New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
- Davidoff RA. Migraine. Manifestations, pathogenesis and management (2nd ed). New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
- International Headache Society. http://www.i-h-s.org
Drug brand names
- Citalopram • Celexa
- Dihydroergotamine • Migranal
- Eletriptan • Relpax
- Rizatriptan • Maxalt
- Sumatriptan • Imitrex
- Valproate sodium • Depakote
- Zolmitriptan • Zomig
Disclosure
Dr. Smith reports that he serves as a consultant to and is on the speakers’ bureau of AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals.
Dr. Hasse reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
1. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S, Diamond M, Reed M. Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache 2001;41(7):646-57.
2. Breslau N, Davis GC. Migraine, major depression and panic disorder: A prospective epidemiologic study of young adults. Cephalalgia 1992;12(2):85-90.
3. Stewart WF, Linet MS, Celentano DD. Migraine headaches and panic attacks. Psychosom Med 1989;51(5):559-69.
4. Mersky H, Peatfield RC. Headache in the psychiatrically ill. In: Olesen J, Tfelt-Hensen P, Welch KMA (eds). The headaches (2nd ed). Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 1999;962-3.
5. Davidoff RA. Comorbidity. In: Davidoff RA (ed). Migraine manifestations, pathogenesis, and management (2nd ed). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002;21-2.
6. Chang CL, Donaghy M, Poulter N. Migraine and stroke in young women: case-control study. BMJ 1999;318(7175):13-8.
7. Migraine-epilepsy relationships: epidemiological and genetic aspects. In: Andermann FA, Lugaresi E (eds). Migraine and epilepsy. Boston: Butterworths, 1987.
8. Smith R. Impact of migraine on the family. Headache 1998;38(6):423-6.
9. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 1988;8(suppl 7):1-96.
10. Smith R, Hasse LA, Ritchey PN, et al. Extent of migraine and migrainous headache in headache NOS patients in family practice. Cephalalgia 2001;21:291-2.
11. Olesen J, Friberg L, et al. Basic mechanisms in vascular headache. Neurol Clin 1990;8:801-15.
12. Sumatriptan—an oral dose-defining study. The Oral Sumatriptan Dose-Defining Study Group. Eur Neurol 1991;31(5):300-5.
13. Diener HC. Positron emission tomography studies in headache. Headache 1997;37(10):622-5.
14. Joutel A, Bousser MG, V Biousse, et al. A gene for familial hemiplegic migraine maps to chromosome 19. Nat Genet 1993;5(1):40-5.
15. Iadecola C, Pelligrino DA, Moskowitz MA, Lassen NA. Nitric oxide synthase inhibition and cerebrovascular regulation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1994;14(2):175-92.
16. Holroyd KA, Penzien DB, Lipchik GL. Efficacy of Behavioral Treatments. In: Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Dalessio DJ (eds). Wolf’s headache and other head pain (7th ed). New York: Oxford University Press, 2001;563-6.
17. Robinson LA, Berman JS, Neimeyer RA. Psychotherapy for the treatment of depression: A comprehensive review of controlled outcome research. Psychol Bull 1990;108:30-49.
18. Gould RA, Otto MW, et al. Cognitive behavioral and pharmacological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Behav Ther 1997;28:285-305.
19. Breslau N, Andreski P. Migraine, personality and psychiatric comorbidity. Headache 1995;35(7):382-6.
20. Breslau N. Migraine, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. Neurology 1992;42(2):392-5.
21. Breslau N, Schultz LR, Stewart WF, et al. Headache and major depression: is the association specific to migraine? Neurology 2000;54(2):308-13.
Many of the 28 million people who suffer from migraine headaches each year1 need psychiatric care in addition to headache relief. Migraine headaches often coexist with depression,2 anxiety/panic disorders,2,3 bipolar disorder,4 and phobias,5 as well as with stroke6 and epilepsy.7 A study of 995 young adults found that anxiety disorders, phobias, major depression, panic disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder were two to five times more prevalent among migraine sufferers than among a control group (Table 1 ).2
Migraine sufferers know that at any time an attack could hamper their ability to work, care for their families, or engage in social activities. A nationwide study of migraineurs found that attacks often impaired their relationships with family and friends.8
Psychiatrists should screen patients for a history of migraine or other headaches and carefully consider the relationship between migraines and psychiatric disorders when prescribing treatment. In this article, we outline acute and preventive headache treatments and present two cases to help you treat these patients appropriately.
Table 1
PSYCHIATRIC COMORBIDITIES IN PATIENTS WITH VS. WITHOUT MIGRAINES*
| Migraineurs (%) (n = 128) | Controls (%) (n = 879) | |
|---|---|---|
| Any anxiety | 54 | 27 |
| Generalized anxiety disorder | 10 | 2 |
| Phobia | 40 | 21 |
| Major depression | 35 | 10 |
| Panic disorder | 11 | 2 |
| Obsessive-compulsive disorder | 9 | 2 |
| * Prevalence Source: Breslau N, Davis GC. Cephalalgia 1992;12(2):85-90. | ||
Table 2
THREE TYPES OF PRIMARY HEADACHE: DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
| Headache type | Age of onset (years) | Location | Duration | Frequency/timing | Severity | Quality | Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Migraine | 10 to 40 | Hemicranial | 4 to 72 hr | Variable | Moderate to severe | Throbbing, steady ache | Nausea; vomiting; photo/phono/osmophobia; neurologic deficits; aura |
| Tension-type | 20 to 50 | Bilateral/generalized | 30 min to 7 days+ | Variable | Dull ache, may wax and wane | Tight, band-like pressure | Generally none |
| Cluster | 15 to 40 | Unilateral, periorbital or retro-orbital | 15 to 180 min | 1 to 8 times per day or night | Excruciating | Boring, piercing | Ipsilateral, conjunctival injection, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, miosis, facial seating |
| Source: Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 1988;8(suppl 7):1-96. | |||||||
Headache definitions and diagnosis
Primary or secondary. Under the International Headache Society’s (IHS) 1988 headache classification and diagnostic criteria,9 headaches are primary or secondary:
- Primary headaches are benign recurrent headaches that commonly present in practice.
- Secondary headaches occur much less frequently and are caused by underlying pathology.
The possibility of secondary headache should be ruled out before a primary headache can be diagnosed. The following headache features should cause concern:
- Severe headache with abrupt onset
- Subacute or progressive headache over days or months
- Headache, nausea, vomiting, and fever not explained by systemic illness
- New-onset headache late in life
- Headache with neurologic signs or symptoms such as confusion, decreased level of consciousness, meningismus, or papilledema
- Headache following head trauma
- Patient history of sickle cell disease, malignancy, or HIV.
Headache types. The three major types of primary headache are migraine, tension-type, and cluster (Table 2 ). Tension-type is the most common, is often mild, and is either self-treated with over-the-counter medications or ignored. Migraine is the most troublesome headache in everyday practice. Cluster is the most severe and fortunately is rare.
Migraine with aura and migraine without aura are separate diagnoses. IHS criteria for diagnosing migraines without aura are listed in Table 3. According to the IHS, migraine with aura (or “classic migraine”) fulfills all the criteria for migraine without aura, with fully reversible neurologic symptoms indicating focal cerebral cortical and/or brain stem dysfunction.
Auras. About 15% of migraineurs experience auras. Symptoms develop within 5 to 20 minutes, usually last less than 1 hour, and fade before the headache’s onset. Gradual onset and history of previous attacks helps to distinguish aura from transient ischemic attacks. Auras may manifest as visual, sensory, motor, or brain-stem symptoms, or as combinations of these:
- Visual auras are most common, presenting as localized visual loss (scotoma), with flashing lights (scintillation) at margins or jagged edges (fortification).
- Sensory auras present as facial or limb paresthesias.
- Motor auras manifest as weakness or lack of coordination.
- Brain stem auras manifest as vertigo or double vision.
Migraine aura is considered part of the headache’s prodrome, which may occur days or hours before the headache’s onset. The aura may bring about:
- an altered mental state (e.g., depression, hyperactivity, euphoria, difficulty concentrating, dysphasia)
- neurologic symptoms (e.g., photophobia, phonophobia, hyperosmia, yawning)
- general bodily discomforts (e.g., anorexia, food craving, diarrhea, thirst, urination, fluid retention, cold feeling).
Despite their sometimes severe effects, migraines often remain undiagnosed.10 Migraine should be suspected in patients with recurrent moderate to severe disabling headaches (Box).11-15
Case 1: “Bad, sick headaches”
Ms. A, 23, a single parent with a 2-year-old child, has had trouble staying employed because of repeated illnesses. She made 17 visits to her primary care physician within 26 months. While her main complaint was headache, she also complained of other aches and pains, a lack of energy, and insomnia. Numerous examinations revealed no physical abnormalities.
She reported having “bad, sick headaches” that sometimes lasted 2 to 3 days. Bed rest helped but this was not always possible. The headache was throbbing and usually one-sided. She had no aura, and ibuprofen gave partial relief. She noted that her mother gets similar headaches.
Table 3
DIAGNOSTIC REQUIREMENTS FOR MIGRAINE WITHOUT AURA
Mandatory
|
At least 2 of the following:
|
| During headache At least one of the following:
|
| Additional features Migraine prodrome—A range of general, neurologic, and mental changes may occur hours or days before the headache’s onset General—Anorexia, food craving, diarrhea or constipation, thirst, urination, fluid retention, cold feeling Mental—Depression, hyperactivity, euphoria, difficulty concentrating, dysphasia Neurologic—Photophobia, phonophobia, hyperosmia, yawning |
| SOURCE: Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 1988;8(suppl 7):1-96. |
Ms. A was diagnosed with migraine without aura, and she was treated with sumatriptan, 100 mg (1 or 2 doses, as needed). Her headaches responded well to this treatment, but the frequency of attacks remained unchanged. She requested a change in her medicine.
The underlying mechanisms of migraine headaches are not completely understood.
Vascular causes. A recently described neurovascular mechanism11 suggests that perivascular neurogenic inflammation involving meningeal vessels causes migraine. The triptan drugs have been found to reverse this process and relieve the headache.12
Positron emission tomography has demonstrated increased blood flow during acute migraine in midline brain stem structures. This suggests the presence of a central migraine generator in that location.13
Heredity. A rare form of migraine, familial hemiplegic migraine, is associated with a genetic abnormality on chromosome 19.14
Nitric oxide. Nitroglycerine-induced migraine headache, caused by the release of nitric oxide in cerebral vessels, can be reversed by nitrous oxide synthase inhibitors, thus opening up intriguing possibilities of new therapeutic agents and increased understanding of underlying migraine mechanisms.15
Treating migraines
Acute treatment. Migraineurs whose attacks are infrequent and mild may find OTC analgesics or NSAIDs adequate. Most patients, however, require specific migraine treatment, usually with triptans. Acute oral treatment options include sumatriptan, 50 to 100 mg; rizatriptan, 10 mg; zolmitriptan, 2.5 to 5 mg; and eletriptan, 40 mg.
In case of vomiting or nausea, options include sumatriptan, 20 mg nasal spray or 6 mg SC; rizatriptan, 10 mg on a dissolving wafer; or dihydroergotamine, 2 mg nasal spray or 1 mg IM or SC. For severe nausea or vomiting, an anti-nauseant (e.g., prochlorperazine suppositories, 25 mg) may be of value.
Preventive treatment. Preventive treatment may be warranted, depending on attack frequency, severity, and the extent of disability caused. One prolonged, severe attack per month that responds poorly to acute treatment may indicate the need for preventive treatment. A range of preventative treatments is available (Table 4).
In Ms. A’s case, oral sumatriptan lessened the severity of the migraine attacks, and the addition of nortriptyline, 50 mg/d, reduced frequency by about 50%. She felt more energetic overall and was sleeping better.
Treating the psychiatric comorbidity
Behavioral therapy is used as an adjunct to pharmacologic headache treatment. This approach is usually considered after a poor or adverse response to treatment, or when pharmacologic treatment is contraindicated (e.g., during pregnancy).
Relaxation training, biofeedback, and cognitive-behavioral stress management are the most commonly used forms of behavioral therapy. Thirty-five to 55% improvement in migraine has been reported following such treatments.16
Cognitive-behavioral intervention has been shown to be effective in depression17 and anxiety disorders.18 When either psychiatric problem is comorbid with migraine, cognitive therapy can improve both the migraine and the psychiatric comorbidity.
Pharmacologic therapy. Depression is commonly associated with migraine and may be caused by living with chronic disabling headaches over time. In such cases, the depression will improve as the migraine responds to treatment. However, in cases where comorbid depression or anxiety trigger or exacerbate acute migraine attacks, neither the migraine nor the psychiatric problem responds until the underlying psychopathology is treated. In such cases, simultaneous psychiatric and migraine pharmacologic treatment is required.
We recommend that you treat the psychiatric comorbidity as it would be treated without a co-existing migraine. Be advised, however, that monoamine oxidase inhibitors are contraindicated in depression during the 2 weeks before treating the comorbid migraine with a triptan. If the patient does not respond or if there is concern regarding possible underlying pathology, consult with a clinician who specializes in headache treatment.
Precipitating and aggravating factors
Headache triggers. Helping patients to recognize headache triggers and aggravating factors is an important element in treating and preventing migraines. Identifying these factors in the patient history can help you establish a diagnosis and implement steps to avoid or reduce attack severity.
Table 4
TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR PREVENTING MIGRAINE ATTACKS
| Drug | Efficacy* | Side effects* | Indications | Contraindications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β blockers | 4+ | 2+ | Hypertension | Depression, asthma, diabetes, hypotension, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease |
| Ca channel blockers | 2+ | 1+ | Hypertension, angina, asthma, migraine aura | Constipation, hypotension |
| Tricyclic antidepressants | 4+ | 2+ | Depression, anxiety disorders, insomnia | Heart block, urinary retention, mania |
| Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors | 2+ | 1+ | Depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder | Mania |
| Monoamine oxidase inhibitors | 4+ | 4+ | Depression | Dietary restrictions |
| Divalproex/valproate | 4+ | 2+ | Epilepsy, anxiety disorders, mania | Liver disease, bleeding disorders, hair loss |
| Naproxen | 2+ | 2+ | Arthritis, other pain disorders | Gastritis, peptic ulcer |
| * Ratings on a scale from 1+ (lowest) to 4+ (highest). Table partially derived from data in: Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Smith, R (eds). Headache in primary care. Oxford, UK: Isis Medical Media, 1999. | ||||
Common migraine headache triggers include menstruation, stress, relaxation after stress, fatigue, too much or too little sleep, skipping meals, weather changes, high humidity, glare and flickering lights, loud or high-pitched noises, smoke or dust, strong perfumes or cooking aromas. Food triggers cause 10% of migraine cases. Chocolate, strong cheeses, red wine, beer, citrus fruits, and foods with monosodium glutamate and nitrate preservatives are common food triggers.
Tension-type headaches are triggered by stress or the end of a stress-filled day. Triggers for cluster-type headaches include alcohol, smoking during the cluster phase, and lying down during an attack.
Case 2: Flying the unfriendly skies
Ms. B, 38, is a mother of three who works as a flight attendant. She is separated from her husband and had filed for divorce because of repeated spousal abuse. She has visited her primary care physician multiple times for migraine, sinus problems, backache, and coccygodynia. Orthopedic and rectal examinations revealed no abnormalities.
Her headaches met the IHS diagnostic criteria for migraine with aura, and these responded well to zolmitriptan, 5 mg. The headaches usually occurred during days off from work, but her sinus problems also led to headaches and nasal stuffiness when she flew. Her headaches eventually occurred almost daily.
Her supervisor was unsympathetic. An otolaryngologist had prescribed decongestants and a course of desensitization, both of which brought only transient relief.
A counselor at work recommended that Ms. B go on sick leave and accept a transfer to a non-flying job. The patient was tearful and felt overwhelmed by her problems. She felt that life was no longer worth living. She agreed to see a psychiatrist, who diagnosed depression and anxiety disorder. The psychiatrist prescribed citalopram, 20 mg/d, and agreed to see her regularly to monitor progress.
Discussion. As a migraineur, Ms. B was at increased risk for depression and anxiety disorders.19 Migraine with aura is associated with an increased lifetime prevalence of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts.20
The exact mechanisms by which migraine and depression are related are unknown. Each disorder increases the risk for developing the other. The specificity of this relationship is strengthened by the fact that depression is not associated with a greater risk of severe nonmigrainous headache, even though a severe nonmigrainous headache may cause depression.21
The patient in case 1 responded well when an antidepressant was added to her treatment. In her case, the diagnosis of a depressive disorder remained an open question. Migraine attacks are known to be associated with mood change, lethargy, and cognitive changes. The picture may be further confounded because migraine without depression responds well to prophylaxis with antidepressants.
The patient in case 2, however, presented with a complex of interrelated headache and psychiatric problems of potentially dangerous proportions. Psychiatric problems in migraineurs may be deep-seated, and these patients may require urgent, specialized attention to avoid further serious disability and a possible tragic outcome.
Related resources
- Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Smith, R, eds. Headache in primary care. Oxford, UK: Isis Medical Media, 1999.
- Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Dalessio DJ. Wolff’s headache and other head pain (7th ed). New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
- Davidoff RA. Migraine. Manifestations, pathogenesis and management (2nd ed). New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
- International Headache Society. http://www.i-h-s.org
Drug brand names
- Citalopram • Celexa
- Dihydroergotamine • Migranal
- Eletriptan • Relpax
- Rizatriptan • Maxalt
- Sumatriptan • Imitrex
- Valproate sodium • Depakote
- Zolmitriptan • Zomig
Disclosure
Dr. Smith reports that he serves as a consultant to and is on the speakers’ bureau of AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals.
Dr. Hasse reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Many of the 28 million people who suffer from migraine headaches each year1 need psychiatric care in addition to headache relief. Migraine headaches often coexist with depression,2 anxiety/panic disorders,2,3 bipolar disorder,4 and phobias,5 as well as with stroke6 and epilepsy.7 A study of 995 young adults found that anxiety disorders, phobias, major depression, panic disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder were two to five times more prevalent among migraine sufferers than among a control group (Table 1 ).2
Migraine sufferers know that at any time an attack could hamper their ability to work, care for their families, or engage in social activities. A nationwide study of migraineurs found that attacks often impaired their relationships with family and friends.8
Psychiatrists should screen patients for a history of migraine or other headaches and carefully consider the relationship between migraines and psychiatric disorders when prescribing treatment. In this article, we outline acute and preventive headache treatments and present two cases to help you treat these patients appropriately.
Table 1
PSYCHIATRIC COMORBIDITIES IN PATIENTS WITH VS. WITHOUT MIGRAINES*
| Migraineurs (%) (n = 128) | Controls (%) (n = 879) | |
|---|---|---|
| Any anxiety | 54 | 27 |
| Generalized anxiety disorder | 10 | 2 |
| Phobia | 40 | 21 |
| Major depression | 35 | 10 |
| Panic disorder | 11 | 2 |
| Obsessive-compulsive disorder | 9 | 2 |
| * Prevalence Source: Breslau N, Davis GC. Cephalalgia 1992;12(2):85-90. | ||
Table 2
THREE TYPES OF PRIMARY HEADACHE: DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
| Headache type | Age of onset (years) | Location | Duration | Frequency/timing | Severity | Quality | Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Migraine | 10 to 40 | Hemicranial | 4 to 72 hr | Variable | Moderate to severe | Throbbing, steady ache | Nausea; vomiting; photo/phono/osmophobia; neurologic deficits; aura |
| Tension-type | 20 to 50 | Bilateral/generalized | 30 min to 7 days+ | Variable | Dull ache, may wax and wane | Tight, band-like pressure | Generally none |
| Cluster | 15 to 40 | Unilateral, periorbital or retro-orbital | 15 to 180 min | 1 to 8 times per day or night | Excruciating | Boring, piercing | Ipsilateral, conjunctival injection, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, miosis, facial seating |
| Source: Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 1988;8(suppl 7):1-96. | |||||||
Headache definitions and diagnosis
Primary or secondary. Under the International Headache Society’s (IHS) 1988 headache classification and diagnostic criteria,9 headaches are primary or secondary:
- Primary headaches are benign recurrent headaches that commonly present in practice.
- Secondary headaches occur much less frequently and are caused by underlying pathology.
The possibility of secondary headache should be ruled out before a primary headache can be diagnosed. The following headache features should cause concern:
- Severe headache with abrupt onset
- Subacute or progressive headache over days or months
- Headache, nausea, vomiting, and fever not explained by systemic illness
- New-onset headache late in life
- Headache with neurologic signs or symptoms such as confusion, decreased level of consciousness, meningismus, or papilledema
- Headache following head trauma
- Patient history of sickle cell disease, malignancy, or HIV.
Headache types. The three major types of primary headache are migraine, tension-type, and cluster (Table 2 ). Tension-type is the most common, is often mild, and is either self-treated with over-the-counter medications or ignored. Migraine is the most troublesome headache in everyday practice. Cluster is the most severe and fortunately is rare.
Migraine with aura and migraine without aura are separate diagnoses. IHS criteria for diagnosing migraines without aura are listed in Table 3. According to the IHS, migraine with aura (or “classic migraine”) fulfills all the criteria for migraine without aura, with fully reversible neurologic symptoms indicating focal cerebral cortical and/or brain stem dysfunction.
Auras. About 15% of migraineurs experience auras. Symptoms develop within 5 to 20 minutes, usually last less than 1 hour, and fade before the headache’s onset. Gradual onset and history of previous attacks helps to distinguish aura from transient ischemic attacks. Auras may manifest as visual, sensory, motor, or brain-stem symptoms, or as combinations of these:
- Visual auras are most common, presenting as localized visual loss (scotoma), with flashing lights (scintillation) at margins or jagged edges (fortification).
- Sensory auras present as facial or limb paresthesias.
- Motor auras manifest as weakness or lack of coordination.
- Brain stem auras manifest as vertigo or double vision.
Migraine aura is considered part of the headache’s prodrome, which may occur days or hours before the headache’s onset. The aura may bring about:
- an altered mental state (e.g., depression, hyperactivity, euphoria, difficulty concentrating, dysphasia)
- neurologic symptoms (e.g., photophobia, phonophobia, hyperosmia, yawning)
- general bodily discomforts (e.g., anorexia, food craving, diarrhea, thirst, urination, fluid retention, cold feeling).
Despite their sometimes severe effects, migraines often remain undiagnosed.10 Migraine should be suspected in patients with recurrent moderate to severe disabling headaches (Box).11-15
Case 1: “Bad, sick headaches”
Ms. A, 23, a single parent with a 2-year-old child, has had trouble staying employed because of repeated illnesses. She made 17 visits to her primary care physician within 26 months. While her main complaint was headache, she also complained of other aches and pains, a lack of energy, and insomnia. Numerous examinations revealed no physical abnormalities.
She reported having “bad, sick headaches” that sometimes lasted 2 to 3 days. Bed rest helped but this was not always possible. The headache was throbbing and usually one-sided. She had no aura, and ibuprofen gave partial relief. She noted that her mother gets similar headaches.
Table 3
DIAGNOSTIC REQUIREMENTS FOR MIGRAINE WITHOUT AURA
Mandatory
|
At least 2 of the following:
|
| During headache At least one of the following:
|
| Additional features Migraine prodrome—A range of general, neurologic, and mental changes may occur hours or days before the headache’s onset General—Anorexia, food craving, diarrhea or constipation, thirst, urination, fluid retention, cold feeling Mental—Depression, hyperactivity, euphoria, difficulty concentrating, dysphasia Neurologic—Photophobia, phonophobia, hyperosmia, yawning |
| SOURCE: Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 1988;8(suppl 7):1-96. |
Ms. A was diagnosed with migraine without aura, and she was treated with sumatriptan, 100 mg (1 or 2 doses, as needed). Her headaches responded well to this treatment, but the frequency of attacks remained unchanged. She requested a change in her medicine.
The underlying mechanisms of migraine headaches are not completely understood.
Vascular causes. A recently described neurovascular mechanism11 suggests that perivascular neurogenic inflammation involving meningeal vessels causes migraine. The triptan drugs have been found to reverse this process and relieve the headache.12
Positron emission tomography has demonstrated increased blood flow during acute migraine in midline brain stem structures. This suggests the presence of a central migraine generator in that location.13
Heredity. A rare form of migraine, familial hemiplegic migraine, is associated with a genetic abnormality on chromosome 19.14
Nitric oxide. Nitroglycerine-induced migraine headache, caused by the release of nitric oxide in cerebral vessels, can be reversed by nitrous oxide synthase inhibitors, thus opening up intriguing possibilities of new therapeutic agents and increased understanding of underlying migraine mechanisms.15
Treating migraines
Acute treatment. Migraineurs whose attacks are infrequent and mild may find OTC analgesics or NSAIDs adequate. Most patients, however, require specific migraine treatment, usually with triptans. Acute oral treatment options include sumatriptan, 50 to 100 mg; rizatriptan, 10 mg; zolmitriptan, 2.5 to 5 mg; and eletriptan, 40 mg.
In case of vomiting or nausea, options include sumatriptan, 20 mg nasal spray or 6 mg SC; rizatriptan, 10 mg on a dissolving wafer; or dihydroergotamine, 2 mg nasal spray or 1 mg IM or SC. For severe nausea or vomiting, an anti-nauseant (e.g., prochlorperazine suppositories, 25 mg) may be of value.
Preventive treatment. Preventive treatment may be warranted, depending on attack frequency, severity, and the extent of disability caused. One prolonged, severe attack per month that responds poorly to acute treatment may indicate the need for preventive treatment. A range of preventative treatments is available (Table 4).
In Ms. A’s case, oral sumatriptan lessened the severity of the migraine attacks, and the addition of nortriptyline, 50 mg/d, reduced frequency by about 50%. She felt more energetic overall and was sleeping better.
Treating the psychiatric comorbidity
Behavioral therapy is used as an adjunct to pharmacologic headache treatment. This approach is usually considered after a poor or adverse response to treatment, or when pharmacologic treatment is contraindicated (e.g., during pregnancy).
Relaxation training, biofeedback, and cognitive-behavioral stress management are the most commonly used forms of behavioral therapy. Thirty-five to 55% improvement in migraine has been reported following such treatments.16
Cognitive-behavioral intervention has been shown to be effective in depression17 and anxiety disorders.18 When either psychiatric problem is comorbid with migraine, cognitive therapy can improve both the migraine and the psychiatric comorbidity.
Pharmacologic therapy. Depression is commonly associated with migraine and may be caused by living with chronic disabling headaches over time. In such cases, the depression will improve as the migraine responds to treatment. However, in cases where comorbid depression or anxiety trigger or exacerbate acute migraine attacks, neither the migraine nor the psychiatric problem responds until the underlying psychopathology is treated. In such cases, simultaneous psychiatric and migraine pharmacologic treatment is required.
We recommend that you treat the psychiatric comorbidity as it would be treated without a co-existing migraine. Be advised, however, that monoamine oxidase inhibitors are contraindicated in depression during the 2 weeks before treating the comorbid migraine with a triptan. If the patient does not respond or if there is concern regarding possible underlying pathology, consult with a clinician who specializes in headache treatment.
Precipitating and aggravating factors
Headache triggers. Helping patients to recognize headache triggers and aggravating factors is an important element in treating and preventing migraines. Identifying these factors in the patient history can help you establish a diagnosis and implement steps to avoid or reduce attack severity.
Table 4
TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR PREVENTING MIGRAINE ATTACKS
| Drug | Efficacy* | Side effects* | Indications | Contraindications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β blockers | 4+ | 2+ | Hypertension | Depression, asthma, diabetes, hypotension, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease |
| Ca channel blockers | 2+ | 1+ | Hypertension, angina, asthma, migraine aura | Constipation, hypotension |
| Tricyclic antidepressants | 4+ | 2+ | Depression, anxiety disorders, insomnia | Heart block, urinary retention, mania |
| Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors | 2+ | 1+ | Depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder | Mania |
| Monoamine oxidase inhibitors | 4+ | 4+ | Depression | Dietary restrictions |
| Divalproex/valproate | 4+ | 2+ | Epilepsy, anxiety disorders, mania | Liver disease, bleeding disorders, hair loss |
| Naproxen | 2+ | 2+ | Arthritis, other pain disorders | Gastritis, peptic ulcer |
| * Ratings on a scale from 1+ (lowest) to 4+ (highest). Table partially derived from data in: Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Smith, R (eds). Headache in primary care. Oxford, UK: Isis Medical Media, 1999. | ||||
Common migraine headache triggers include menstruation, stress, relaxation after stress, fatigue, too much or too little sleep, skipping meals, weather changes, high humidity, glare and flickering lights, loud or high-pitched noises, smoke or dust, strong perfumes or cooking aromas. Food triggers cause 10% of migraine cases. Chocolate, strong cheeses, red wine, beer, citrus fruits, and foods with monosodium glutamate and nitrate preservatives are common food triggers.
Tension-type headaches are triggered by stress or the end of a stress-filled day. Triggers for cluster-type headaches include alcohol, smoking during the cluster phase, and lying down during an attack.
Case 2: Flying the unfriendly skies
Ms. B, 38, is a mother of three who works as a flight attendant. She is separated from her husband and had filed for divorce because of repeated spousal abuse. She has visited her primary care physician multiple times for migraine, sinus problems, backache, and coccygodynia. Orthopedic and rectal examinations revealed no abnormalities.
Her headaches met the IHS diagnostic criteria for migraine with aura, and these responded well to zolmitriptan, 5 mg. The headaches usually occurred during days off from work, but her sinus problems also led to headaches and nasal stuffiness when she flew. Her headaches eventually occurred almost daily.
Her supervisor was unsympathetic. An otolaryngologist had prescribed decongestants and a course of desensitization, both of which brought only transient relief.
A counselor at work recommended that Ms. B go on sick leave and accept a transfer to a non-flying job. The patient was tearful and felt overwhelmed by her problems. She felt that life was no longer worth living. She agreed to see a psychiatrist, who diagnosed depression and anxiety disorder. The psychiatrist prescribed citalopram, 20 mg/d, and agreed to see her regularly to monitor progress.
Discussion. As a migraineur, Ms. B was at increased risk for depression and anxiety disorders.19 Migraine with aura is associated with an increased lifetime prevalence of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts.20
The exact mechanisms by which migraine and depression are related are unknown. Each disorder increases the risk for developing the other. The specificity of this relationship is strengthened by the fact that depression is not associated with a greater risk of severe nonmigrainous headache, even though a severe nonmigrainous headache may cause depression.21
The patient in case 1 responded well when an antidepressant was added to her treatment. In her case, the diagnosis of a depressive disorder remained an open question. Migraine attacks are known to be associated with mood change, lethargy, and cognitive changes. The picture may be further confounded because migraine without depression responds well to prophylaxis with antidepressants.
The patient in case 2, however, presented with a complex of interrelated headache and psychiatric problems of potentially dangerous proportions. Psychiatric problems in migraineurs may be deep-seated, and these patients may require urgent, specialized attention to avoid further serious disability and a possible tragic outcome.
Related resources
- Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Smith, R, eds. Headache in primary care. Oxford, UK: Isis Medical Media, 1999.
- Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Dalessio DJ. Wolff’s headache and other head pain (7th ed). New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
- Davidoff RA. Migraine. Manifestations, pathogenesis and management (2nd ed). New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
- International Headache Society. http://www.i-h-s.org
Drug brand names
- Citalopram • Celexa
- Dihydroergotamine • Migranal
- Eletriptan • Relpax
- Rizatriptan • Maxalt
- Sumatriptan • Imitrex
- Valproate sodium • Depakote
- Zolmitriptan • Zomig
Disclosure
Dr. Smith reports that he serves as a consultant to and is on the speakers’ bureau of AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals.
Dr. Hasse reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
1. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S, Diamond M, Reed M. Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache 2001;41(7):646-57.
2. Breslau N, Davis GC. Migraine, major depression and panic disorder: A prospective epidemiologic study of young adults. Cephalalgia 1992;12(2):85-90.
3. Stewart WF, Linet MS, Celentano DD. Migraine headaches and panic attacks. Psychosom Med 1989;51(5):559-69.
4. Mersky H, Peatfield RC. Headache in the psychiatrically ill. In: Olesen J, Tfelt-Hensen P, Welch KMA (eds). The headaches (2nd ed). Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 1999;962-3.
5. Davidoff RA. Comorbidity. In: Davidoff RA (ed). Migraine manifestations, pathogenesis, and management (2nd ed). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002;21-2.
6. Chang CL, Donaghy M, Poulter N. Migraine and stroke in young women: case-control study. BMJ 1999;318(7175):13-8.
7. Migraine-epilepsy relationships: epidemiological and genetic aspects. In: Andermann FA, Lugaresi E (eds). Migraine and epilepsy. Boston: Butterworths, 1987.
8. Smith R. Impact of migraine on the family. Headache 1998;38(6):423-6.
9. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 1988;8(suppl 7):1-96.
10. Smith R, Hasse LA, Ritchey PN, et al. Extent of migraine and migrainous headache in headache NOS patients in family practice. Cephalalgia 2001;21:291-2.
11. Olesen J, Friberg L, et al. Basic mechanisms in vascular headache. Neurol Clin 1990;8:801-15.
12. Sumatriptan—an oral dose-defining study. The Oral Sumatriptan Dose-Defining Study Group. Eur Neurol 1991;31(5):300-5.
13. Diener HC. Positron emission tomography studies in headache. Headache 1997;37(10):622-5.
14. Joutel A, Bousser MG, V Biousse, et al. A gene for familial hemiplegic migraine maps to chromosome 19. Nat Genet 1993;5(1):40-5.
15. Iadecola C, Pelligrino DA, Moskowitz MA, Lassen NA. Nitric oxide synthase inhibition and cerebrovascular regulation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1994;14(2):175-92.
16. Holroyd KA, Penzien DB, Lipchik GL. Efficacy of Behavioral Treatments. In: Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Dalessio DJ (eds). Wolf’s headache and other head pain (7th ed). New York: Oxford University Press, 2001;563-6.
17. Robinson LA, Berman JS, Neimeyer RA. Psychotherapy for the treatment of depression: A comprehensive review of controlled outcome research. Psychol Bull 1990;108:30-49.
18. Gould RA, Otto MW, et al. Cognitive behavioral and pharmacological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Behav Ther 1997;28:285-305.
19. Breslau N, Andreski P. Migraine, personality and psychiatric comorbidity. Headache 1995;35(7):382-6.
20. Breslau N. Migraine, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. Neurology 1992;42(2):392-5.
21. Breslau N, Schultz LR, Stewart WF, et al. Headache and major depression: is the association specific to migraine? Neurology 2000;54(2):308-13.
1. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S, Diamond M, Reed M. Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache 2001;41(7):646-57.
2. Breslau N, Davis GC. Migraine, major depression and panic disorder: A prospective epidemiologic study of young adults. Cephalalgia 1992;12(2):85-90.
3. Stewart WF, Linet MS, Celentano DD. Migraine headaches and panic attacks. Psychosom Med 1989;51(5):559-69.
4. Mersky H, Peatfield RC. Headache in the psychiatrically ill. In: Olesen J, Tfelt-Hensen P, Welch KMA (eds). The headaches (2nd ed). Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 1999;962-3.
5. Davidoff RA. Comorbidity. In: Davidoff RA (ed). Migraine manifestations, pathogenesis, and management (2nd ed). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002;21-2.
6. Chang CL, Donaghy M, Poulter N. Migraine and stroke in young women: case-control study. BMJ 1999;318(7175):13-8.
7. Migraine-epilepsy relationships: epidemiological and genetic aspects. In: Andermann FA, Lugaresi E (eds). Migraine and epilepsy. Boston: Butterworths, 1987.
8. Smith R. Impact of migraine on the family. Headache 1998;38(6):423-6.
9. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 1988;8(suppl 7):1-96.
10. Smith R, Hasse LA, Ritchey PN, et al. Extent of migraine and migrainous headache in headache NOS patients in family practice. Cephalalgia 2001;21:291-2.
11. Olesen J, Friberg L, et al. Basic mechanisms in vascular headache. Neurol Clin 1990;8:801-15.
12. Sumatriptan—an oral dose-defining study. The Oral Sumatriptan Dose-Defining Study Group. Eur Neurol 1991;31(5):300-5.
13. Diener HC. Positron emission tomography studies in headache. Headache 1997;37(10):622-5.
14. Joutel A, Bousser MG, V Biousse, et al. A gene for familial hemiplegic migraine maps to chromosome 19. Nat Genet 1993;5(1):40-5.
15. Iadecola C, Pelligrino DA, Moskowitz MA, Lassen NA. Nitric oxide synthase inhibition and cerebrovascular regulation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1994;14(2):175-92.
16. Holroyd KA, Penzien DB, Lipchik GL. Efficacy of Behavioral Treatments. In: Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Dalessio DJ (eds). Wolf’s headache and other head pain (7th ed). New York: Oxford University Press, 2001;563-6.
17. Robinson LA, Berman JS, Neimeyer RA. Psychotherapy for the treatment of depression: A comprehensive review of controlled outcome research. Psychol Bull 1990;108:30-49.
18. Gould RA, Otto MW, et al. Cognitive behavioral and pharmacological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Behav Ther 1997;28:285-305.
19. Breslau N, Andreski P. Migraine, personality and psychiatric comorbidity. Headache 1995;35(7):382-6.
20. Breslau N. Migraine, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. Neurology 1992;42(2):392-5.
21. Breslau N, Schultz LR, Stewart WF, et al. Headache and major depression: is the association specific to migraine? Neurology 2000;54(2):308-13.
A showdown with severe social phobia
History: Living in fear
Mr. I, 41, presents for an initial psychiatric evaluation. He saw a psychologist 8 years ago for a “mild depression,” which he described as a lack of motivation and difficulty concentrating. His mood has been chronically “flat” for the last 10 years. He complains of poor energy and decreased sleep because of irregular work hours, and admits to using over-the-counter caffeine pills to help him function.
The patient denies suicidal ideations, symptoms of guilt, psychotic symptoms, or crying spells, but has a history of alcoholism and cocaine abuse. (He has been sober for 5 years.) Significant recent stressors include a recent breakup with his girlfriend, which he adds “really hasn’t bothered me at all.”
Mr. I has been increasingly avoiding social situations. Though he denies having panic attacks, interaction with other people triggers shortness of breath and chest tight-ness, especially when speaking in public to strangers.
The fear of what others might think of him is dominating Mr. I’s life. For example, he would like to console a housemate whose mother died, but because he is afraid of how the friend will react, Mr. I has not approached him. He adds that he goes out of his way to avoid contact with his co-workers, working irregular hours and eating his lunch in his car rather than the office lounge—even in inclement weather.
Mr. I does attend Alcoholic Anonymous meetings, but often sits toward the back. He had led some meetings, but refused to even look up from the podium while doing so. His anxiety worsened, his heart rate increased, and his palms sweated while leading the group. He began attending different AA meetings so that others would not recognize him and volunteer him to lead.
He adds that he feels comfortable meeting and dating women, since these exchanges are “scripted.” As he gets to know his partner better, however, Mr. I becomes more self-conscious.
Which of Mr. I’s symptoms would you address first: the depressive or the phobic?
Drs. Yu’s, Gordon’s, and Maguire’s observations
Based on Mr. I’s presentation, one might at first diagnose major depressive disorder, but chronic avoidance patterns differentiate his illness from an endogenous depression. Mr. I was diagnosed as having social phobia, a disorder that has been gaining attention among researchers.
A phobia is defined as an irrational fear that produces conscious avoidance of the feared subject, activity, or situation. The presence or anticipation of the phobic entity elicits severe distress, though the affected person usually recognizes that the reaction is excessive. DSM-IV defines social phobia as a strong, persisting fear of potentially embarrassing situations (Box).1
Two peaks of onset have been described: one occurring before age 5, and the other between ages 11 and 17.2 The mean age of onset has been reported to be 15.2
- A marked and persistent fear of one or more social or performance situations in which the person is exposed to unfamiliar people or to possible scrutiny by others. The individual fears that he or she will act in a way (or show anxiety symptoms) that will be humiliating or embarrassing.
- Exposure to the feared social situation almost invariably provokes anxiety, which may take the form of a situational or predisposed panic attack.
- The person recognizes that the fear is excessive or unreasonable.
- The feared social or performance situations are avoided, or else endured with intense anxiety or distress.
- The avoidance, anxious anticipation, or distress in the feared social or performance situation(s) interferes significantly with the person’s normal routine, occupational or academic functioning, or social activities or relationships with others, or there is marked distress about having the phobia.
- In individuals younger than 18, the duration is at least 6 months.
- The fear or avoidance is not caused directly by a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse or medication) or general medical condition, and is not better accounted for by another mental disorder (e.g., panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, separation anxiety disorder, body dysmorphic disorder, a pervasive developmental disorder, or schizoid personality disorder).
- If a general medical condition or other mental disorder is present, the fear in criterion A is unrelated to it (e.g., the patient does not fear stuttering, trembling in Parkinson’s disease, or exhibiting abnormal eating behavior in anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa). Specify if:
SOURCE: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
DSM-IV describes two types of social phobia: generalized social phobia and performance phobia. Normal fear and shyness should be differentiated from social phobia. Medical conditions—including CNS tumors and cerebrovascular diseases—and drugs typically bring about neurologic and mental status symptoms that can confound the diagnosis.
Symptoms of other anxiety disorders, including panic disorder and agoraphobia, may mimic social phobia. Fear in social phobia is not present outside of, or in anticipation of, the feared situation. Social phobia also can be misdiagnosed as an avoidant personality, schizoid personality, or major depressive disorder.1
At this point, one should consider diagnosing Mr. I with social phobia, as evinced by his excessive avoidance of social situations. Mr. I also recognizes that his avoidance is excessive and causes difficulty in his daily functioning.
Behavioral inhibition in childhood is suggested to be more common in children with parents who had panic disorder. Generalized fear may manifest later as excessive shyness. Several studies have linked childhood behavior inhibition to social phobia.5-7’
First treatment: Pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy
Mr. I is interested in trying an antidepressant, but noted that about 6 years ago a brief course of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor led to difficulty sleeping and decreased libido and orgasm. He agrees to take bupropion SR, 100 mg/d, titrated after 2 weeks to 100 mg bid.
He also begins cognitive-behavioral and supportive therapy, during which he reveals that his pattern of avoidance took root in grade school, where he was often a quiet sidekick to the popular kids. During therapy, he describes visitations with his daughters, both of whom live with his ex-wife, as extremely difficult.
“I really don’t know what to say,” Mr. I says. “We often stare at each other during dessert, and I want to get it over with and go home.”
After 1 month, his bupropion SR is increased to 150 mg bid. One month later, his feelings of depression are under control. He sleeps well, no longer feels fatigued, and can concentrate. Still he isolates himself, fearing others’ disapproval. He has become more resistant to psychotherapy. “I know my patterns. I know what I do, but I can’t change it,” he says.
How would you treat Mr. I’s persistent social phobia? Would you switch his medications or augment existing ones? Does psychotherapy still have a role in treatment?
Drs. Yu’s, Gordon’s, and Maguire’s observations
Pharmacologic treatment of social phobia has spawned several neurochemical hypotheses. As beta-adrenergic antagonists have been proven efficacious in treating performance phobia, an adrenergic hypothesis suggests patients with performance phobia release more norepinephrine and epinephrine or are more sensitive to normal levels of these neuro-transmitters.8
The success of monoamine oxidase inhibitors in generalized social phobia suggests that dopamine plays a role in treating this form of the disorder. Central dopamine activity has been associated with positive emotions or extraversion.9
SSRIs have also demonstrated efficacy against generalized social phobia.10 Researchers have associated higher serotonin levels with increased social dominance11 and suggest that abnormal dopamine and serotonin levels contribute to the disorder’s pathogenesis.
Current treatments include psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, and studies suggest that a combination of the two may be more efficacious than either alone.8 Venlafaxine, phenelzine, buspirone, benzodiazepines, and SSRIs have all demonstrated effectiveness and tolerability in generalized social phobia. Beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists (e.g., atenolol, propranolol) are commonly administered to treat performance phobia shortly before exposure to the phobic stimulus.
An adequate time frame for psychopharmacologic treatment of social phobia has not been defined. In depression therapy, medications should be maintained for at least 4 to 5 weeks before considering the regimen unsuccessful.1
While Mr. I’s depression responded well to bupropion SR, a medication whose mechanism involves dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake, use of a medication that augments his serotonin may further improve his condition.
Cognitive and behavioral therapies also are indicated for both generalized social phobia and performance phobia. These should be considered along with medication therapy for Mr. I to treat his social phobia and prevent a relapse.
Despite the available evidence, however, the course and prognosis of social phobia are not clear. Data are still forthcoming on this recently recognized disorder.
Further treatment: Another neurotransmitter
Again cautious of potential adverse sexual effects, Mr. I agrees to try mirtazapine, 30 mg at bedtime, in addition to bupropion SR. He initially complains of sedation and lowered energy, but is willing to continue the mirtazapine, hoping that it will help his social phobia.
Two months after starting mirtazapine, Mr. I is still fearful at work and home, and his relationship with his order. Generalized fear may manifest later as excessive shyness. Several studies have linked childhood behavior inhibition to social phobia.5-7’ daughters has not improved. After another month, he reports that his sedation has resolved, but complains of increased fatigue and difficulty concentrating. He suspects that the bupropion SR has stopped working.
After another month, Mr. I self-discontinues the mirtazapine. Though he tries to participate in social situations, his anxiety has worsened. He goes to a country music club once a week but is afraid to ask anyone to dance.
Should you focus on Mr. I’s depression rather than his social phobia? If so, how do you change his treatment?
Drs. Yu’s, Gordon’s, and Maguire’s observations
The severity of Mr. I’s social phobia may be causing his depression. Both trials of bupropion SR and mirtazapine have been adequate for his depression but have not alleviated his social phobia.
Medications that affect gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels, specifically benzodiazepines, have not been tried. Benzodiazepines provide rapid relief with little risk in short-term treatment, but dependence/withdrawal risks increase greatly when given more than 4 to 6 months.8 Because of Mr. I’s chronic anxiety in social phobia and his history of alcoholism, benzodiazepines are not recommended.
The novel compound tiagabine has been shown to increase GABA in the synaptic cleft.12 GABA increases chloride conduction through its ligand-gated channels, creating a potential antianxiety effect similar to that produced by benzodiazepines.8,13,14 GAT-1, the predominant transporter, removes excess GABA.
Just as SSRIs inhibit serotonin reuptake and allow the neurotransmitter to act on its receptors to alleviate depression and anxiety, so does tiagabine inhibit GAT-1. Theoretically, tiagabine may relieve anxiety by increasing synaptic concentrations of GABA.
Tiagabine also has been shown to be well-tolerated without a known abuse or dependence potential.12 Possible adverse effects include impaired concentration, somnolence, fatigue, nausea, and dizziness. To avoid adverse effects, slow titration (about 4 mg per week) is recommended.
Changing treatment: Looking up
Tiagabine, 4 mg at bedtime, is added to help with Mr. I’s anxiety; he is instructed to increase the dosage by 4 mg every 5 days in divided doses. He began to sense improvement during the second week, at 4 mg bid, and 2 weeks later his anxiety has been greatly reduced. He can now sit quietly with his co-workers during coffee breaks and has begun training a co-worker, which he never dared to attempt before. At this point, he was tolerating tiagabine at 8 mg bid.
One month later, tiagabine is increased to 16 mg bid. Mr. I has noticed mild dizziness with each dosage increase, but each time it subsided within a day. He has been maintained on 16 mg bid.
Saying that his anxiety is now well-controlled, Mr. I enjoys at least one dance each week at the country music club he frequents. One week later, he led an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting—while looking up to his audience for the first time. He continues these activities and his therapy sessions, which are geared toward developing stronger skills to minimize his anxiety. He is considering lowering his medication dosages (though he is wary of a possible relapse) and furthering his therapy.
Related resources
- Anxiety Disorders Association of America www.adaa.org
- National Institute of Mental Health: Phobias from NLM’s MEDLINEplus http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/phobias.html
Author affiliations
Dr. Yu is a fellow in child and adolescent psychiatry, Dr. Gordon is a resident physician; and Dr. Maguire is assistant dean for continuing medical education, director of resident training, and associate clinical professor, department of psychiatry, University of California, Irvine.
Drug brand names
- Bupropion • Wellbutrin
- Buspirone • BuSpar
- Mirtazapine • Remeron
- Phenelzine • Nardil
- Tiagabine • Gabitril
- Venlafaxine • Effexor
Disclosure
Dr. Yu reports that he serves on the speaker’s bureau of Cephalon Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., and Pfizer Inc., and receives research/grant support from and serves as a consultant to Eli Lilly and Co.
Dr. Gordon reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.
Dr. Maguire reports that he receives research/grant support from, serves as a consultant to, and is on the speaker’s bureau of Eli Lilly and Co., is on the speaker’s bureau of Pfizer Inc., and receives research/grant support from Forest Laboratories and GlaxoSmithKline.
1. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Kaplan and Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry (7th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.
2. Schneier FR, Johnson J, Hornig CD, Liebowitz MR, Weissman MM. Social phobia: comorbidity and morbidity in an epidemiological sample. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:282-8.
3. Wacker HR, Mhllejans R, Klein KH, Battegay R. Identification of cases of anxiety disorders and affective disorders in the community according to ICD-10 and DSM-III-R using the composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 1992;2:91-100.
4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed), text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
5. Van Ameringen M, Mancini C, Oakman JM. The relationship of behavioral inhibition and shyness to anxiety disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 1998;186:425-31.
6. Schwartz CE, Snidman N, Kagan J. Adolescent social anxiety as an outcome of inhibited temperament in childhood. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999;38:1008-15.
7. Turner SM, Beidel DC, Townsley RM. Social phobia: relationship to shyness. Behav Res Ther 1990;28:497-505.
8. Stahl SM. Essential psychopharmacology: neuroscientific basis and practical application (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
9. Depue RA, Luciana M, Arbisi P, Collins P, Leon A. Dopamine and the structure of personality: relation of agonist induced dopamine activity to positive emotionality. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994;67:485-98.
10. Van Ameringen M, Mancini C, Oakman JM, Farvolden P. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of social phobia: the emerging gold standard. CNS Drugs 1999;11:307-15.
11. Knutson B, Wolkowitz OM, Cole SW, et al. Selective alteration of personality and social behavior by serotonergic intervention. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:373-9.
12. Physician’s Desk Reference (55th ed). Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics, 2001.
13. Bowery NG. Pharmacology of mammalian GABAB receptors. In: Enna SJ, Bowery NG (eds). The GABA receptors (2nd ed). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 1997;209-36.
14. Johnston GAR. Molecular biology, pharmacology, and physiology of GABAC receptors. In: Enna SJ, Bowery NG (eds). The GABA receptors (2nd ed). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 1997;297-323.
History: Living in fear
Mr. I, 41, presents for an initial psychiatric evaluation. He saw a psychologist 8 years ago for a “mild depression,” which he described as a lack of motivation and difficulty concentrating. His mood has been chronically “flat” for the last 10 years. He complains of poor energy and decreased sleep because of irregular work hours, and admits to using over-the-counter caffeine pills to help him function.
The patient denies suicidal ideations, symptoms of guilt, psychotic symptoms, or crying spells, but has a history of alcoholism and cocaine abuse. (He has been sober for 5 years.) Significant recent stressors include a recent breakup with his girlfriend, which he adds “really hasn’t bothered me at all.”
Mr. I has been increasingly avoiding social situations. Though he denies having panic attacks, interaction with other people triggers shortness of breath and chest tight-ness, especially when speaking in public to strangers.
The fear of what others might think of him is dominating Mr. I’s life. For example, he would like to console a housemate whose mother died, but because he is afraid of how the friend will react, Mr. I has not approached him. He adds that he goes out of his way to avoid contact with his co-workers, working irregular hours and eating his lunch in his car rather than the office lounge—even in inclement weather.
Mr. I does attend Alcoholic Anonymous meetings, but often sits toward the back. He had led some meetings, but refused to even look up from the podium while doing so. His anxiety worsened, his heart rate increased, and his palms sweated while leading the group. He began attending different AA meetings so that others would not recognize him and volunteer him to lead.
He adds that he feels comfortable meeting and dating women, since these exchanges are “scripted.” As he gets to know his partner better, however, Mr. I becomes more self-conscious.
Which of Mr. I’s symptoms would you address first: the depressive or the phobic?
Drs. Yu’s, Gordon’s, and Maguire’s observations
Based on Mr. I’s presentation, one might at first diagnose major depressive disorder, but chronic avoidance patterns differentiate his illness from an endogenous depression. Mr. I was diagnosed as having social phobia, a disorder that has been gaining attention among researchers.
A phobia is defined as an irrational fear that produces conscious avoidance of the feared subject, activity, or situation. The presence or anticipation of the phobic entity elicits severe distress, though the affected person usually recognizes that the reaction is excessive. DSM-IV defines social phobia as a strong, persisting fear of potentially embarrassing situations (Box).1
Two peaks of onset have been described: one occurring before age 5, and the other between ages 11 and 17.2 The mean age of onset has been reported to be 15.2
- A marked and persistent fear of one or more social or performance situations in which the person is exposed to unfamiliar people or to possible scrutiny by others. The individual fears that he or she will act in a way (or show anxiety symptoms) that will be humiliating or embarrassing.
- Exposure to the feared social situation almost invariably provokes anxiety, which may take the form of a situational or predisposed panic attack.
- The person recognizes that the fear is excessive or unreasonable.
- The feared social or performance situations are avoided, or else endured with intense anxiety or distress.
- The avoidance, anxious anticipation, or distress in the feared social or performance situation(s) interferes significantly with the person’s normal routine, occupational or academic functioning, or social activities or relationships with others, or there is marked distress about having the phobia.
- In individuals younger than 18, the duration is at least 6 months.
- The fear or avoidance is not caused directly by a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse or medication) or general medical condition, and is not better accounted for by another mental disorder (e.g., panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, separation anxiety disorder, body dysmorphic disorder, a pervasive developmental disorder, or schizoid personality disorder).
- If a general medical condition or other mental disorder is present, the fear in criterion A is unrelated to it (e.g., the patient does not fear stuttering, trembling in Parkinson’s disease, or exhibiting abnormal eating behavior in anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa). Specify if:
SOURCE: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
DSM-IV describes two types of social phobia: generalized social phobia and performance phobia. Normal fear and shyness should be differentiated from social phobia. Medical conditions—including CNS tumors and cerebrovascular diseases—and drugs typically bring about neurologic and mental status symptoms that can confound the diagnosis.
Symptoms of other anxiety disorders, including panic disorder and agoraphobia, may mimic social phobia. Fear in social phobia is not present outside of, or in anticipation of, the feared situation. Social phobia also can be misdiagnosed as an avoidant personality, schizoid personality, or major depressive disorder.1
At this point, one should consider diagnosing Mr. I with social phobia, as evinced by his excessive avoidance of social situations. Mr. I also recognizes that his avoidance is excessive and causes difficulty in his daily functioning.
Behavioral inhibition in childhood is suggested to be more common in children with parents who had panic disorder. Generalized fear may manifest later as excessive shyness. Several studies have linked childhood behavior inhibition to social phobia.5-7’
First treatment: Pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy
Mr. I is interested in trying an antidepressant, but noted that about 6 years ago a brief course of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor led to difficulty sleeping and decreased libido and orgasm. He agrees to take bupropion SR, 100 mg/d, titrated after 2 weeks to 100 mg bid.
He also begins cognitive-behavioral and supportive therapy, during which he reveals that his pattern of avoidance took root in grade school, where he was often a quiet sidekick to the popular kids. During therapy, he describes visitations with his daughters, both of whom live with his ex-wife, as extremely difficult.
“I really don’t know what to say,” Mr. I says. “We often stare at each other during dessert, and I want to get it over with and go home.”
After 1 month, his bupropion SR is increased to 150 mg bid. One month later, his feelings of depression are under control. He sleeps well, no longer feels fatigued, and can concentrate. Still he isolates himself, fearing others’ disapproval. He has become more resistant to psychotherapy. “I know my patterns. I know what I do, but I can’t change it,” he says.
How would you treat Mr. I’s persistent social phobia? Would you switch his medications or augment existing ones? Does psychotherapy still have a role in treatment?
Drs. Yu’s, Gordon’s, and Maguire’s observations
Pharmacologic treatment of social phobia has spawned several neurochemical hypotheses. As beta-adrenergic antagonists have been proven efficacious in treating performance phobia, an adrenergic hypothesis suggests patients with performance phobia release more norepinephrine and epinephrine or are more sensitive to normal levels of these neuro-transmitters.8
The success of monoamine oxidase inhibitors in generalized social phobia suggests that dopamine plays a role in treating this form of the disorder. Central dopamine activity has been associated with positive emotions or extraversion.9
SSRIs have also demonstrated efficacy against generalized social phobia.10 Researchers have associated higher serotonin levels with increased social dominance11 and suggest that abnormal dopamine and serotonin levels contribute to the disorder’s pathogenesis.
Current treatments include psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, and studies suggest that a combination of the two may be more efficacious than either alone.8 Venlafaxine, phenelzine, buspirone, benzodiazepines, and SSRIs have all demonstrated effectiveness and tolerability in generalized social phobia. Beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists (e.g., atenolol, propranolol) are commonly administered to treat performance phobia shortly before exposure to the phobic stimulus.
An adequate time frame for psychopharmacologic treatment of social phobia has not been defined. In depression therapy, medications should be maintained for at least 4 to 5 weeks before considering the regimen unsuccessful.1
While Mr. I’s depression responded well to bupropion SR, a medication whose mechanism involves dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake, use of a medication that augments his serotonin may further improve his condition.
Cognitive and behavioral therapies also are indicated for both generalized social phobia and performance phobia. These should be considered along with medication therapy for Mr. I to treat his social phobia and prevent a relapse.
Despite the available evidence, however, the course and prognosis of social phobia are not clear. Data are still forthcoming on this recently recognized disorder.
Further treatment: Another neurotransmitter
Again cautious of potential adverse sexual effects, Mr. I agrees to try mirtazapine, 30 mg at bedtime, in addition to bupropion SR. He initially complains of sedation and lowered energy, but is willing to continue the mirtazapine, hoping that it will help his social phobia.
Two months after starting mirtazapine, Mr. I is still fearful at work and home, and his relationship with his order. Generalized fear may manifest later as excessive shyness. Several studies have linked childhood behavior inhibition to social phobia.5-7’ daughters has not improved. After another month, he reports that his sedation has resolved, but complains of increased fatigue and difficulty concentrating. He suspects that the bupropion SR has stopped working.
After another month, Mr. I self-discontinues the mirtazapine. Though he tries to participate in social situations, his anxiety has worsened. He goes to a country music club once a week but is afraid to ask anyone to dance.
Should you focus on Mr. I’s depression rather than his social phobia? If so, how do you change his treatment?
Drs. Yu’s, Gordon’s, and Maguire’s observations
The severity of Mr. I’s social phobia may be causing his depression. Both trials of bupropion SR and mirtazapine have been adequate for his depression but have not alleviated his social phobia.
Medications that affect gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels, specifically benzodiazepines, have not been tried. Benzodiazepines provide rapid relief with little risk in short-term treatment, but dependence/withdrawal risks increase greatly when given more than 4 to 6 months.8 Because of Mr. I’s chronic anxiety in social phobia and his history of alcoholism, benzodiazepines are not recommended.
The novel compound tiagabine has been shown to increase GABA in the synaptic cleft.12 GABA increases chloride conduction through its ligand-gated channels, creating a potential antianxiety effect similar to that produced by benzodiazepines.8,13,14 GAT-1, the predominant transporter, removes excess GABA.
Just as SSRIs inhibit serotonin reuptake and allow the neurotransmitter to act on its receptors to alleviate depression and anxiety, so does tiagabine inhibit GAT-1. Theoretically, tiagabine may relieve anxiety by increasing synaptic concentrations of GABA.
Tiagabine also has been shown to be well-tolerated without a known abuse or dependence potential.12 Possible adverse effects include impaired concentration, somnolence, fatigue, nausea, and dizziness. To avoid adverse effects, slow titration (about 4 mg per week) is recommended.
Changing treatment: Looking up
Tiagabine, 4 mg at bedtime, is added to help with Mr. I’s anxiety; he is instructed to increase the dosage by 4 mg every 5 days in divided doses. He began to sense improvement during the second week, at 4 mg bid, and 2 weeks later his anxiety has been greatly reduced. He can now sit quietly with his co-workers during coffee breaks and has begun training a co-worker, which he never dared to attempt before. At this point, he was tolerating tiagabine at 8 mg bid.
One month later, tiagabine is increased to 16 mg bid. Mr. I has noticed mild dizziness with each dosage increase, but each time it subsided within a day. He has been maintained on 16 mg bid.
Saying that his anxiety is now well-controlled, Mr. I enjoys at least one dance each week at the country music club he frequents. One week later, he led an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting—while looking up to his audience for the first time. He continues these activities and his therapy sessions, which are geared toward developing stronger skills to minimize his anxiety. He is considering lowering his medication dosages (though he is wary of a possible relapse) and furthering his therapy.
Related resources
- Anxiety Disorders Association of America www.adaa.org
- National Institute of Mental Health: Phobias from NLM’s MEDLINEplus http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/phobias.html
Author affiliations
Dr. Yu is a fellow in child and adolescent psychiatry, Dr. Gordon is a resident physician; and Dr. Maguire is assistant dean for continuing medical education, director of resident training, and associate clinical professor, department of psychiatry, University of California, Irvine.
Drug brand names
- Bupropion • Wellbutrin
- Buspirone • BuSpar
- Mirtazapine • Remeron
- Phenelzine • Nardil
- Tiagabine • Gabitril
- Venlafaxine • Effexor
Disclosure
Dr. Yu reports that he serves on the speaker’s bureau of Cephalon Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., and Pfizer Inc., and receives research/grant support from and serves as a consultant to Eli Lilly and Co.
Dr. Gordon reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.
Dr. Maguire reports that he receives research/grant support from, serves as a consultant to, and is on the speaker’s bureau of Eli Lilly and Co., is on the speaker’s bureau of Pfizer Inc., and receives research/grant support from Forest Laboratories and GlaxoSmithKline.
History: Living in fear
Mr. I, 41, presents for an initial psychiatric evaluation. He saw a psychologist 8 years ago for a “mild depression,” which he described as a lack of motivation and difficulty concentrating. His mood has been chronically “flat” for the last 10 years. He complains of poor energy and decreased sleep because of irregular work hours, and admits to using over-the-counter caffeine pills to help him function.
The patient denies suicidal ideations, symptoms of guilt, psychotic symptoms, or crying spells, but has a history of alcoholism and cocaine abuse. (He has been sober for 5 years.) Significant recent stressors include a recent breakup with his girlfriend, which he adds “really hasn’t bothered me at all.”
Mr. I has been increasingly avoiding social situations. Though he denies having panic attacks, interaction with other people triggers shortness of breath and chest tight-ness, especially when speaking in public to strangers.
The fear of what others might think of him is dominating Mr. I’s life. For example, he would like to console a housemate whose mother died, but because he is afraid of how the friend will react, Mr. I has not approached him. He adds that he goes out of his way to avoid contact with his co-workers, working irregular hours and eating his lunch in his car rather than the office lounge—even in inclement weather.
Mr. I does attend Alcoholic Anonymous meetings, but often sits toward the back. He had led some meetings, but refused to even look up from the podium while doing so. His anxiety worsened, his heart rate increased, and his palms sweated while leading the group. He began attending different AA meetings so that others would not recognize him and volunteer him to lead.
He adds that he feels comfortable meeting and dating women, since these exchanges are “scripted.” As he gets to know his partner better, however, Mr. I becomes more self-conscious.
Which of Mr. I’s symptoms would you address first: the depressive or the phobic?
Drs. Yu’s, Gordon’s, and Maguire’s observations
Based on Mr. I’s presentation, one might at first diagnose major depressive disorder, but chronic avoidance patterns differentiate his illness from an endogenous depression. Mr. I was diagnosed as having social phobia, a disorder that has been gaining attention among researchers.
A phobia is defined as an irrational fear that produces conscious avoidance of the feared subject, activity, or situation. The presence or anticipation of the phobic entity elicits severe distress, though the affected person usually recognizes that the reaction is excessive. DSM-IV defines social phobia as a strong, persisting fear of potentially embarrassing situations (Box).1
Two peaks of onset have been described: one occurring before age 5, and the other between ages 11 and 17.2 The mean age of onset has been reported to be 15.2
- A marked and persistent fear of one or more social or performance situations in which the person is exposed to unfamiliar people or to possible scrutiny by others. The individual fears that he or she will act in a way (or show anxiety symptoms) that will be humiliating or embarrassing.
- Exposure to the feared social situation almost invariably provokes anxiety, which may take the form of a situational or predisposed panic attack.
- The person recognizes that the fear is excessive or unreasonable.
- The feared social or performance situations are avoided, or else endured with intense anxiety or distress.
- The avoidance, anxious anticipation, or distress in the feared social or performance situation(s) interferes significantly with the person’s normal routine, occupational or academic functioning, or social activities or relationships with others, or there is marked distress about having the phobia.
- In individuals younger than 18, the duration is at least 6 months.
- The fear or avoidance is not caused directly by a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse or medication) or general medical condition, and is not better accounted for by another mental disorder (e.g., panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, separation anxiety disorder, body dysmorphic disorder, a pervasive developmental disorder, or schizoid personality disorder).
- If a general medical condition or other mental disorder is present, the fear in criterion A is unrelated to it (e.g., the patient does not fear stuttering, trembling in Parkinson’s disease, or exhibiting abnormal eating behavior in anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa). Specify if:
SOURCE: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
DSM-IV describes two types of social phobia: generalized social phobia and performance phobia. Normal fear and shyness should be differentiated from social phobia. Medical conditions—including CNS tumors and cerebrovascular diseases—and drugs typically bring about neurologic and mental status symptoms that can confound the diagnosis.
Symptoms of other anxiety disorders, including panic disorder and agoraphobia, may mimic social phobia. Fear in social phobia is not present outside of, or in anticipation of, the feared situation. Social phobia also can be misdiagnosed as an avoidant personality, schizoid personality, or major depressive disorder.1
At this point, one should consider diagnosing Mr. I with social phobia, as evinced by his excessive avoidance of social situations. Mr. I also recognizes that his avoidance is excessive and causes difficulty in his daily functioning.
Behavioral inhibition in childhood is suggested to be more common in children with parents who had panic disorder. Generalized fear may manifest later as excessive shyness. Several studies have linked childhood behavior inhibition to social phobia.5-7’
First treatment: Pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy
Mr. I is interested in trying an antidepressant, but noted that about 6 years ago a brief course of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor led to difficulty sleeping and decreased libido and orgasm. He agrees to take bupropion SR, 100 mg/d, titrated after 2 weeks to 100 mg bid.
He also begins cognitive-behavioral and supportive therapy, during which he reveals that his pattern of avoidance took root in grade school, where he was often a quiet sidekick to the popular kids. During therapy, he describes visitations with his daughters, both of whom live with his ex-wife, as extremely difficult.
“I really don’t know what to say,” Mr. I says. “We often stare at each other during dessert, and I want to get it over with and go home.”
After 1 month, his bupropion SR is increased to 150 mg bid. One month later, his feelings of depression are under control. He sleeps well, no longer feels fatigued, and can concentrate. Still he isolates himself, fearing others’ disapproval. He has become more resistant to psychotherapy. “I know my patterns. I know what I do, but I can’t change it,” he says.
How would you treat Mr. I’s persistent social phobia? Would you switch his medications or augment existing ones? Does psychotherapy still have a role in treatment?
Drs. Yu’s, Gordon’s, and Maguire’s observations
Pharmacologic treatment of social phobia has spawned several neurochemical hypotheses. As beta-adrenergic antagonists have been proven efficacious in treating performance phobia, an adrenergic hypothesis suggests patients with performance phobia release more norepinephrine and epinephrine or are more sensitive to normal levels of these neuro-transmitters.8
The success of monoamine oxidase inhibitors in generalized social phobia suggests that dopamine plays a role in treating this form of the disorder. Central dopamine activity has been associated with positive emotions or extraversion.9
SSRIs have also demonstrated efficacy against generalized social phobia.10 Researchers have associated higher serotonin levels with increased social dominance11 and suggest that abnormal dopamine and serotonin levels contribute to the disorder’s pathogenesis.
Current treatments include psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, and studies suggest that a combination of the two may be more efficacious than either alone.8 Venlafaxine, phenelzine, buspirone, benzodiazepines, and SSRIs have all demonstrated effectiveness and tolerability in generalized social phobia. Beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists (e.g., atenolol, propranolol) are commonly administered to treat performance phobia shortly before exposure to the phobic stimulus.
An adequate time frame for psychopharmacologic treatment of social phobia has not been defined. In depression therapy, medications should be maintained for at least 4 to 5 weeks before considering the regimen unsuccessful.1
While Mr. I’s depression responded well to bupropion SR, a medication whose mechanism involves dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake, use of a medication that augments his serotonin may further improve his condition.
Cognitive and behavioral therapies also are indicated for both generalized social phobia and performance phobia. These should be considered along with medication therapy for Mr. I to treat his social phobia and prevent a relapse.
Despite the available evidence, however, the course and prognosis of social phobia are not clear. Data are still forthcoming on this recently recognized disorder.
Further treatment: Another neurotransmitter
Again cautious of potential adverse sexual effects, Mr. I agrees to try mirtazapine, 30 mg at bedtime, in addition to bupropion SR. He initially complains of sedation and lowered energy, but is willing to continue the mirtazapine, hoping that it will help his social phobia.
Two months after starting mirtazapine, Mr. I is still fearful at work and home, and his relationship with his order. Generalized fear may manifest later as excessive shyness. Several studies have linked childhood behavior inhibition to social phobia.5-7’ daughters has not improved. After another month, he reports that his sedation has resolved, but complains of increased fatigue and difficulty concentrating. He suspects that the bupropion SR has stopped working.
After another month, Mr. I self-discontinues the mirtazapine. Though he tries to participate in social situations, his anxiety has worsened. He goes to a country music club once a week but is afraid to ask anyone to dance.
Should you focus on Mr. I’s depression rather than his social phobia? If so, how do you change his treatment?
Drs. Yu’s, Gordon’s, and Maguire’s observations
The severity of Mr. I’s social phobia may be causing his depression. Both trials of bupropion SR and mirtazapine have been adequate for his depression but have not alleviated his social phobia.
Medications that affect gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels, specifically benzodiazepines, have not been tried. Benzodiazepines provide rapid relief with little risk in short-term treatment, but dependence/withdrawal risks increase greatly when given more than 4 to 6 months.8 Because of Mr. I’s chronic anxiety in social phobia and his history of alcoholism, benzodiazepines are not recommended.
The novel compound tiagabine has been shown to increase GABA in the synaptic cleft.12 GABA increases chloride conduction through its ligand-gated channels, creating a potential antianxiety effect similar to that produced by benzodiazepines.8,13,14 GAT-1, the predominant transporter, removes excess GABA.
Just as SSRIs inhibit serotonin reuptake and allow the neurotransmitter to act on its receptors to alleviate depression and anxiety, so does tiagabine inhibit GAT-1. Theoretically, tiagabine may relieve anxiety by increasing synaptic concentrations of GABA.
Tiagabine also has been shown to be well-tolerated without a known abuse or dependence potential.12 Possible adverse effects include impaired concentration, somnolence, fatigue, nausea, and dizziness. To avoid adverse effects, slow titration (about 4 mg per week) is recommended.
Changing treatment: Looking up
Tiagabine, 4 mg at bedtime, is added to help with Mr. I’s anxiety; he is instructed to increase the dosage by 4 mg every 5 days in divided doses. He began to sense improvement during the second week, at 4 mg bid, and 2 weeks later his anxiety has been greatly reduced. He can now sit quietly with his co-workers during coffee breaks and has begun training a co-worker, which he never dared to attempt before. At this point, he was tolerating tiagabine at 8 mg bid.
One month later, tiagabine is increased to 16 mg bid. Mr. I has noticed mild dizziness with each dosage increase, but each time it subsided within a day. He has been maintained on 16 mg bid.
Saying that his anxiety is now well-controlled, Mr. I enjoys at least one dance each week at the country music club he frequents. One week later, he led an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting—while looking up to his audience for the first time. He continues these activities and his therapy sessions, which are geared toward developing stronger skills to minimize his anxiety. He is considering lowering his medication dosages (though he is wary of a possible relapse) and furthering his therapy.
Related resources
- Anxiety Disorders Association of America www.adaa.org
- National Institute of Mental Health: Phobias from NLM’s MEDLINEplus http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/phobias.html
Author affiliations
Dr. Yu is a fellow in child and adolescent psychiatry, Dr. Gordon is a resident physician; and Dr. Maguire is assistant dean for continuing medical education, director of resident training, and associate clinical professor, department of psychiatry, University of California, Irvine.
Drug brand names
- Bupropion • Wellbutrin
- Buspirone • BuSpar
- Mirtazapine • Remeron
- Phenelzine • Nardil
- Tiagabine • Gabitril
- Venlafaxine • Effexor
Disclosure
Dr. Yu reports that he serves on the speaker’s bureau of Cephalon Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., and Pfizer Inc., and receives research/grant support from and serves as a consultant to Eli Lilly and Co.
Dr. Gordon reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.
Dr. Maguire reports that he receives research/grant support from, serves as a consultant to, and is on the speaker’s bureau of Eli Lilly and Co., is on the speaker’s bureau of Pfizer Inc., and receives research/grant support from Forest Laboratories and GlaxoSmithKline.
1. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Kaplan and Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry (7th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.
2. Schneier FR, Johnson J, Hornig CD, Liebowitz MR, Weissman MM. Social phobia: comorbidity and morbidity in an epidemiological sample. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:282-8.
3. Wacker HR, Mhllejans R, Klein KH, Battegay R. Identification of cases of anxiety disorders and affective disorders in the community according to ICD-10 and DSM-III-R using the composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 1992;2:91-100.
4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed), text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
5. Van Ameringen M, Mancini C, Oakman JM. The relationship of behavioral inhibition and shyness to anxiety disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 1998;186:425-31.
6. Schwartz CE, Snidman N, Kagan J. Adolescent social anxiety as an outcome of inhibited temperament in childhood. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999;38:1008-15.
7. Turner SM, Beidel DC, Townsley RM. Social phobia: relationship to shyness. Behav Res Ther 1990;28:497-505.
8. Stahl SM. Essential psychopharmacology: neuroscientific basis and practical application (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
9. Depue RA, Luciana M, Arbisi P, Collins P, Leon A. Dopamine and the structure of personality: relation of agonist induced dopamine activity to positive emotionality. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994;67:485-98.
10. Van Ameringen M, Mancini C, Oakman JM, Farvolden P. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of social phobia: the emerging gold standard. CNS Drugs 1999;11:307-15.
11. Knutson B, Wolkowitz OM, Cole SW, et al. Selective alteration of personality and social behavior by serotonergic intervention. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:373-9.
12. Physician’s Desk Reference (55th ed). Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics, 2001.
13. Bowery NG. Pharmacology of mammalian GABAB receptors. In: Enna SJ, Bowery NG (eds). The GABA receptors (2nd ed). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 1997;209-36.
14. Johnston GAR. Molecular biology, pharmacology, and physiology of GABAC receptors. In: Enna SJ, Bowery NG (eds). The GABA receptors (2nd ed). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 1997;297-323.
1. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Kaplan and Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry (7th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.
2. Schneier FR, Johnson J, Hornig CD, Liebowitz MR, Weissman MM. Social phobia: comorbidity and morbidity in an epidemiological sample. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:282-8.
3. Wacker HR, Mhllejans R, Klein KH, Battegay R. Identification of cases of anxiety disorders and affective disorders in the community according to ICD-10 and DSM-III-R using the composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 1992;2:91-100.
4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed), text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
5. Van Ameringen M, Mancini C, Oakman JM. The relationship of behavioral inhibition and shyness to anxiety disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 1998;186:425-31.
6. Schwartz CE, Snidman N, Kagan J. Adolescent social anxiety as an outcome of inhibited temperament in childhood. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999;38:1008-15.
7. Turner SM, Beidel DC, Townsley RM. Social phobia: relationship to shyness. Behav Res Ther 1990;28:497-505.
8. Stahl SM. Essential psychopharmacology: neuroscientific basis and practical application (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
9. Depue RA, Luciana M, Arbisi P, Collins P, Leon A. Dopamine and the structure of personality: relation of agonist induced dopamine activity to positive emotionality. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994;67:485-98.
10. Van Ameringen M, Mancini C, Oakman JM, Farvolden P. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of social phobia: the emerging gold standard. CNS Drugs 1999;11:307-15.
11. Knutson B, Wolkowitz OM, Cole SW, et al. Selective alteration of personality and social behavior by serotonergic intervention. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:373-9.
12. Physician’s Desk Reference (55th ed). Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics, 2001.
13. Bowery NG. Pharmacology of mammalian GABAB receptors. In: Enna SJ, Bowery NG (eds). The GABA receptors (2nd ed). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 1997;209-36.
14. Johnston GAR. Molecular biology, pharmacology, and physiology of GABAC receptors. In: Enna SJ, Bowery NG (eds). The GABA receptors (2nd ed). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 1997;297-323.