Photo Challenge

The Diagnosis: Bimatoprost-Induced Hypertrichosis 

Latanoprost, a prostaglandin analogue, typically is prescribed by ophthalmologists as eye drops to reduce intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma.¹ Common adverse reactions of latanoprost drops include blurred vision, ocular irritation, darkening of the eyelid skin, and pigmentation of the iris. 

In 1997, Johnstone² reported hypertrichosis and increased pigmentation of the eyelashes of both eyes and adjacent skin after latanoprost drops were used in glaucoma patients. Subsequently, topical latanoprost and bimatoprost, a similar analogue, are now utilized for the cosmetic purpose of thickening and lengthening the eyelashes due to the hypertrichosis effect. Travoprost, another prostaglandin analogue used to treat glaucoma, also has been associated with periocular hypertrichosis.³ Concomitant poliosis of the eyelashes with hypertrichosis from latanoprost also has been reported.⁴ Our patient specifically purchased the eye drops (marketed as generic bimatoprost) to lengthen her eyelashes and had noticed an increase in length. She denied a family history of increased facial hair in females. 

Along with gingival hyperplasia, systemic cyclosporine may cause generalized hypertrichosis consisting of terminal hair growth, particularly on the face and forearms. However, hypertrichosis from cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% rarely has been reported⁵ but would be more likely to occur in a patient reporting a history of chronic dry eye. Oral acetazolamide, not eye drops, is prescribed for glaucoma and typically is not associated with hypertrichosis. Betamethasone and timolol eye drops may cause burning, stinging, redness, or watering of the eyes, but they do not typically cause hypertrichosis.  

Other systemic medications (eg, zidovudine, phenytoin, minoxidil, danazol, anabolic steroids) may cause hypertrichosis but not typically localized to the periocular area. Phenytoin usually causes hair growth on the limbs but not on the face and trunk. Oral minoxidil causes hypertrichosis, predominately on the face, lower legs, and forearms. 

Systemic conditions such as endocrine abnormalities or porphyria cutanea tarda also may cause hypertrichosis; however, it typically does not present in small focal areas, and other stigmata often are present such as signs of virilization in hirsutism (ie, deepening of voice, pattern alopecia, acne) or liver disease with photosensitive erosions and bullae that leave scars and milia in porphyria cutanea tarda. Acquired hypertrichosis lanuginosa deserves consideration, in part due to its association with lung and colon cancers; however, it consists of softer, downy, nonterminal hairs (malignant down) and is more generalized on the face. Malnutrition from anorexia nervosa may similarly induce hypertrichosis lanuginose.  

The molecular mechanism for latanoprost-induced hypertrichosis is unknown; however, it may promote anagen growth as well as hypertrophic changes in the affected follicles.⁶ Patients should use extreme caution when purchasing unregulated medications due to the risk for impurities, less stable formulation, or inaccurate concentrations. Comparison between brand name and approved generic latanoprost has found notable differences, including variations in active-ingredient concentration, poor stability in warmer temperatures, and higher levels of particulate matter.⁷ Some cosmetic eyelash enhancers sold over-the-counter or online may contain prostaglandin analogues, but they may not be listed as ingredients.⁸ One report noted a bimatoprost product with a concentration level double that of brand-name bimatoprost that was discovered using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.⁹ 

Treatment options for eliminating the excess hairs include discontinuing the prostaglandin analogue or applying it only to the eyelid margin with an appropriate applicator. Waxing, manual extraction, laser hair removal, electrolysis, and depilatory creams are alternative treatments. 

The Diagnosis: Bimatoprost-Induced Hypertrichosis 

Latanoprost, a prostaglandin analogue, typically is prescribed by ophthalmologists as eye drops to reduce intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma.¹ Common adverse reactions of latanoprost drops include blurred vision, ocular irritation, darkening of the eyelid skin, and pigmentation of the iris. 

In 1997, Johnstone² reported hypertrichosis and increased pigmentation of the eyelashes of both eyes and adjacent skin after latanoprost drops were used in glaucoma patients. Subsequently, topical latanoprost and bimatoprost, a similar analogue, are now utilized for the cosmetic purpose of thickening and lengthening the eyelashes due to the hypertrichosis effect. Travoprost, another prostaglandin analogue used to treat glaucoma, also has been associated with periocular hypertrichosis.³ Concomitant poliosis of the eyelashes with hypertrichosis from latanoprost also has been reported.⁴ Our patient specifically purchased the eye drops (marketed as generic bimatoprost) to lengthen her eyelashes and had noticed an increase in length. She denied a family history of increased facial hair in females. 

Along with gingival hyperplasia, systemic cyclosporine may cause generalized hypertrichosis consisting of terminal hair growth, particularly on the face and forearms. However, hypertrichosis from cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% rarely has been reported⁵ but would be more likely to occur in a patient reporting a history of chronic dry eye. Oral acetazolamide, not eye drops, is prescribed for glaucoma and typically is not associated with hypertrichosis. Betamethasone and timolol eye drops may cause burning, stinging, redness, or watering of the eyes, but they do not typically cause hypertrichosis.  

Other systemic medications (eg, zidovudine, phenytoin, minoxidil, danazol, anabolic steroids) may cause hypertrichosis but not typically localized to the periocular area. Phenytoin usually causes hair growth on the limbs but not on the face and trunk. Oral minoxidil causes hypertrichosis, predominately on the face, lower legs, and forearms. 

Systemic conditions such as endocrine abnormalities or porphyria cutanea tarda also may cause hypertrichosis; however, it typically does not present in small focal areas, and other stigmata often are present such as signs of virilization in hirsutism (ie, deepening of voice, pattern alopecia, acne) or liver disease with photosensitive erosions and bullae that leave scars and milia in porphyria cutanea tarda. Acquired hypertrichosis lanuginosa deserves consideration, in part due to its association with lung and colon cancers; however, it consists of softer, downy, nonterminal hairs (malignant down) and is more generalized on the face. Malnutrition from anorexia nervosa may similarly induce hypertrichosis lanuginose.  

The molecular mechanism for latanoprost-induced hypertrichosis is unknown; however, it may promote anagen growth as well as hypertrophic changes in the affected follicles.⁶ Patients should use extreme caution when purchasing unregulated medications due to the risk for impurities, less stable formulation, or inaccurate concentrations. Comparison between brand name and approved generic latanoprost has found notable differences, including variations in active-ingredient concentration, poor stability in warmer temperatures, and higher levels of particulate matter.⁷ Some cosmetic eyelash enhancers sold over-the-counter or online may contain prostaglandin analogues, but they may not be listed as ingredients.⁸ One report noted a bimatoprost product with a concentration level double that of brand-name bimatoprost that was discovered using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.⁹ 

Treatment options for eliminating the excess hairs include discontinuing the prostaglandin analogue or applying it only to the eyelid margin with an appropriate applicator. Waxing, manual extraction, laser hair removal, electrolysis, and depilatory creams are alternative treatments. 

The Diagnosis: Bimatoprost-Induced Hypertrichosis 

Latanoprost, a prostaglandin analogue, typically is prescribed by ophthalmologists as eye drops to reduce intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma.¹ Common adverse reactions of latanoprost drops include blurred vision, ocular irritation, darkening of the eyelid skin, and pigmentation of the iris. 

In 1997, Johnstone² reported hypertrichosis and increased pigmentation of the eyelashes of both eyes and adjacent skin after latanoprost drops were used in glaucoma patients. Subsequently, topical latanoprost and bimatoprost, a similar analogue, are now utilized for the cosmetic purpose of thickening and lengthening the eyelashes due to the hypertrichosis effect. Travoprost, another prostaglandin analogue used to treat glaucoma, also has been associated with periocular hypertrichosis.³ Concomitant poliosis of the eyelashes with hypertrichosis from latanoprost also has been reported.⁴ Our patient specifically purchased the eye drops (marketed as generic bimatoprost) to lengthen her eyelashes and had noticed an increase in length. She denied a family history of increased facial hair in females. 

Along with gingival hyperplasia, systemic cyclosporine may cause generalized hypertrichosis consisting of terminal hair growth, particularly on the face and forearms. However, hypertrichosis from cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% rarely has been reported⁵ but would be more likely to occur in a patient reporting a history of chronic dry eye. Oral acetazolamide, not eye drops, is prescribed for glaucoma and typically is not associated with hypertrichosis. Betamethasone and timolol eye drops may cause burning, stinging, redness, or watering of the eyes, but they do not typically cause hypertrichosis.  

Other systemic medications (eg, zidovudine, phenytoin, minoxidil, danazol, anabolic steroids) may cause hypertrichosis but not typically localized to the periocular area. Phenytoin usually causes hair growth on the limbs but not on the face and trunk. Oral minoxidil causes hypertrichosis, predominately on the face, lower legs, and forearms. 

Systemic conditions such as endocrine abnormalities or porphyria cutanea tarda also may cause hypertrichosis; however, it typically does not present in small focal areas, and other stigmata often are present such as signs of virilization in hirsutism (ie, deepening of voice, pattern alopecia, acne) or liver disease with photosensitive erosions and bullae that leave scars and milia in porphyria cutanea tarda. Acquired hypertrichosis lanuginosa deserves consideration, in part due to its association with lung and colon cancers; however, it consists of softer, downy, nonterminal hairs (malignant down) and is more generalized on the face. Malnutrition from anorexia nervosa may similarly induce hypertrichosis lanuginose.  

The molecular mechanism for latanoprost-induced hypertrichosis is unknown; however, it may promote anagen growth as well as hypertrophic changes in the affected follicles.⁶ Patients should use extreme caution when purchasing unregulated medications due to the risk for impurities, less stable formulation, or inaccurate concentrations. Comparison between brand name and approved generic latanoprost has found notable differences, including variations in active-ingredient concentration, poor stability in warmer temperatures, and higher levels of particulate matter.⁷ Some cosmetic eyelash enhancers sold over-the-counter or online may contain prostaglandin analogues, but they may not be listed as ingredients.⁸ One report noted a bimatoprost product with a concentration level double that of brand-name bimatoprost that was discovered using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.⁹ 

Treatment options for eliminating the excess hairs include discontinuing the prostaglandin analogue or applying it only to the eyelid margin with an appropriate applicator. Waxing, manual extraction, laser hair removal, electrolysis, and depilatory creams are alternative treatments. 

The Diagnosis: Lichen Nitidus 

Our patient represents a case of lichen nitidus (LN) that was diagnosed through clinicopathologic correlation, with the pathology results showing a lymphohistiocytic infiltrate in the papillary dermis enclosed by acanthotic rete ridges on either side. Lichen nitidus was first described by Pinkus in 1901 as a variant of lichen planus.¹ It is a rare chronic inflammatory disease that is most prevalent in children and adolescents.² Clinically, the lesions appear as 1- to 2-mm, shiny, flesh-colored papules with central umbilication.³ Typically, lesions are localized and discrete; however, vesicular, hemorrhagic, perforating, spinous follicular, linear, generalized, and actinic variants all have been reported in the literature. Lichen nitidus has a predilection for the lower abdomen, medial thighs, penis, forearms, ventral wrists, and hands.⁴ Cases of LN have been reported on the palms, soles, nails, and mucosa, presenting a diagnostic challenge.⁵ The pathogenesis of LN is unknown, and all races and sexes are affected equally.⁶  

Histopathologically, LN has distinct findings including a well-circumscribed lymphohistiocytic infiltrate in the papillary dermis embraced by elongated and acanthotic rete ridges.² These histopathologic characteristics were seen in our patient's biopsy specimen (Figure) and have been described as the ball-and-claw configuration. Lichen nitidus may be pruritic but typically is asymptomatic.⁷ It often spontaneously regresses within months to years without any treatment⁷; however, successful outcomes have been seen with topical steroids, UVA/UVB phototherapy, and retinoids.² Our patient was treated with topical steroids. 

The differential diagnosis for LN includes verruca plana, dyshidrotic eczema, acral persistent papular mucinosis (APPM), and molluscum contagiosum. Verruca plana can occur as 1- to 5-mm, grouped, flesh-colored papules on the face, neck, dorsal hands, wrists, or knees.⁸ Most commonly, verruca plana occurs due to human papillomavirus type 3 and less commonly human papillomavirus types 10, 27, and 41. Verruca plana is easily differentiated from LN on pathology with findings of epidermal hyperkeratosis, irregular acanthosis, and koilocytic changes.⁸  

Dyshidrotic eczema is a pruritic vesicular rash that is classically distributed symmetrically on the palmar aspects of the hands and lateral fingers.⁹ Histopathology of the lesions reveals spongiosis with an epidermal lymphocytic infiltrate. Exacerbating factors include exposure to allergens, stress, fungal infections, and genetic predisposition.⁹ 

Acral persistent papular mucinosis can present as multiple, 2- to 5-mm, flesh-colored papules on the dorsal aspects of the hands.¹⁰ However, the demographic is different from LN, as APPM most commonly affects middle-aged females versus adolescents. Lesions of APPM may multiply or spontaneously remit over time. Acral persistent papular mucinosis generally is asymptomatic but can be treated with cryotherapy, topical corticosteroids, electrodesiccation, or CO₂ lasers for cosmetic purposes. Acral persistent papular mucinosis can be easily distinguished from LN on histology, as it will show areas of focal, well-circumscribed mucin in the papillary dermis and a spared Grenz zone.¹⁰ 

Molluscum contagiosum is a common viral skin infection caused by the poxvirus that affects children and adults.¹¹ The skin lesions appear as 2- to 4-mm, dome-shaped, flesh-colored papules with central umbilication on the limbs, trunk, or face. Clinicians may choose to monitor lesions of molluscum contagiosum, as it is a self-limited condition, or it may be treated with cryotherapy, salicylic acid, imiquimod, curettage, laser, or cimetidine.¹¹ On histology, epidermal budlike proliferations can be appreciated in the dermis, and characteristic large, eosinophilic, intracytoplasmic inclusion or molluscum bodies are found in the epidermis.¹² 

The Diagnosis: Lichen Nitidus 

Our patient represents a case of lichen nitidus (LN) that was diagnosed through clinicopathologic correlation, with the pathology results showing a lymphohistiocytic infiltrate in the papillary dermis enclosed by acanthotic rete ridges on either side. Lichen nitidus was first described by Pinkus in 1901 as a variant of lichen planus.¹ It is a rare chronic inflammatory disease that is most prevalent in children and adolescents.² Clinically, the lesions appear as 1- to 2-mm, shiny, flesh-colored papules with central umbilication.³ Typically, lesions are localized and discrete; however, vesicular, hemorrhagic, perforating, spinous follicular, linear, generalized, and actinic variants all have been reported in the literature. Lichen nitidus has a predilection for the lower abdomen, medial thighs, penis, forearms, ventral wrists, and hands.⁴ Cases of LN have been reported on the palms, soles, nails, and mucosa, presenting a diagnostic challenge.⁵ The pathogenesis of LN is unknown, and all races and sexes are affected equally.⁶  

Histopathologically, LN has distinct findings including a well-circumscribed lymphohistiocytic infiltrate in the papillary dermis embraced by elongated and acanthotic rete ridges.² These histopathologic characteristics were seen in our patient's biopsy specimen (Figure) and have been described as the ball-and-claw configuration. Lichen nitidus may be pruritic but typically is asymptomatic.⁷ It often spontaneously regresses within months to years without any treatment⁷; however, successful outcomes have been seen with topical steroids, UVA/UVB phototherapy, and retinoids.² Our patient was treated with topical steroids. 

The differential diagnosis for LN includes verruca plana, dyshidrotic eczema, acral persistent papular mucinosis (APPM), and molluscum contagiosum. Verruca plana can occur as 1- to 5-mm, grouped, flesh-colored papules on the face, neck, dorsal hands, wrists, or knees.⁸ Most commonly, verruca plana occurs due to human papillomavirus type 3 and less commonly human papillomavirus types 10, 27, and 41. Verruca plana is easily differentiated from LN on pathology with findings of epidermal hyperkeratosis, irregular acanthosis, and koilocytic changes.⁸  

Dyshidrotic eczema is a pruritic vesicular rash that is classically distributed symmetrically on the palmar aspects of the hands and lateral fingers.⁹ Histopathology of the lesions reveals spongiosis with an epidermal lymphocytic infiltrate. Exacerbating factors include exposure to allergens, stress, fungal infections, and genetic predisposition.⁹ 

Acral persistent papular mucinosis can present as multiple, 2- to 5-mm, flesh-colored papules on the dorsal aspects of the hands.¹⁰ However, the demographic is different from LN, as APPM most commonly affects middle-aged females versus adolescents. Lesions of APPM may multiply or spontaneously remit over time. Acral persistent papular mucinosis generally is asymptomatic but can be treated with cryotherapy, topical corticosteroids, electrodesiccation, or CO₂ lasers for cosmetic purposes. Acral persistent papular mucinosis can be easily distinguished from LN on histology, as it will show areas of focal, well-circumscribed mucin in the papillary dermis and a spared Grenz zone.¹⁰ 

Molluscum contagiosum is a common viral skin infection caused by the poxvirus that affects children and adults.¹¹ The skin lesions appear as 2- to 4-mm, dome-shaped, flesh-colored papules with central umbilication on the limbs, trunk, or face. Clinicians may choose to monitor lesions of molluscum contagiosum, as it is a self-limited condition, or it may be treated with cryotherapy, salicylic acid, imiquimod, curettage, laser, or cimetidine.¹¹ On histology, epidermal budlike proliferations can be appreciated in the dermis, and characteristic large, eosinophilic, intracytoplasmic inclusion or molluscum bodies are found in the epidermis.¹² 

The Diagnosis: Lichen Nitidus 

Our patient represents a case of lichen nitidus (LN) that was diagnosed through clinicopathologic correlation, with the pathology results showing a lymphohistiocytic infiltrate in the papillary dermis enclosed by acanthotic rete ridges on either side. Lichen nitidus was first described by Pinkus in 1901 as a variant of lichen planus.¹ It is a rare chronic inflammatory disease that is most prevalent in children and adolescents.² Clinically, the lesions appear as 1- to 2-mm, shiny, flesh-colored papules with central umbilication.³ Typically, lesions are localized and discrete; however, vesicular, hemorrhagic, perforating, spinous follicular, linear, generalized, and actinic variants all have been reported in the literature. Lichen nitidus has a predilection for the lower abdomen, medial thighs, penis, forearms, ventral wrists, and hands.⁴ Cases of LN have been reported on the palms, soles, nails, and mucosa, presenting a diagnostic challenge.⁵ The pathogenesis of LN is unknown, and all races and sexes are affected equally.⁶  

Histopathologically, LN has distinct findings including a well-circumscribed lymphohistiocytic infiltrate in the papillary dermis embraced by elongated and acanthotic rete ridges.² These histopathologic characteristics were seen in our patient's biopsy specimen (Figure) and have been described as the ball-and-claw configuration. Lichen nitidus may be pruritic but typically is asymptomatic.⁷ It often spontaneously regresses within months to years without any treatment⁷; however, successful outcomes have been seen with topical steroids, UVA/UVB phototherapy, and retinoids.² Our patient was treated with topical steroids. 

The differential diagnosis for LN includes verruca plana, dyshidrotic eczema, acral persistent papular mucinosis (APPM), and molluscum contagiosum. Verruca plana can occur as 1- to 5-mm, grouped, flesh-colored papules on the face, neck, dorsal hands, wrists, or knees.⁸ Most commonly, verruca plana occurs due to human papillomavirus type 3 and less commonly human papillomavirus types 10, 27, and 41. Verruca plana is easily differentiated from LN on pathology with findings of epidermal hyperkeratosis, irregular acanthosis, and koilocytic changes.⁸  

Dyshidrotic eczema is a pruritic vesicular rash that is classically distributed symmetrically on the palmar aspects of the hands and lateral fingers.⁹ Histopathology of the lesions reveals spongiosis with an epidermal lymphocytic infiltrate. Exacerbating factors include exposure to allergens, stress, fungal infections, and genetic predisposition.⁹ 

Acral persistent papular mucinosis can present as multiple, 2- to 5-mm, flesh-colored papules on the dorsal aspects of the hands.¹⁰ However, the demographic is different from LN, as APPM most commonly affects middle-aged females versus adolescents. Lesions of APPM may multiply or spontaneously remit over time. Acral persistent papular mucinosis generally is asymptomatic but can be treated with cryotherapy, topical corticosteroids, electrodesiccation, or CO₂ lasers for cosmetic purposes. Acral persistent papular mucinosis can be easily distinguished from LN on histology, as it will show areas of focal, well-circumscribed mucin in the papillary dermis and a spared Grenz zone.¹⁰ 

Molluscum contagiosum is a common viral skin infection caused by the poxvirus that affects children and adults.¹¹ The skin lesions appear as 2- to 4-mm, dome-shaped, flesh-colored papules with central umbilication on the limbs, trunk, or face. Clinicians may choose to monitor lesions of molluscum contagiosum, as it is a self-limited condition, or it may be treated with cryotherapy, salicylic acid, imiquimod, curettage, laser, or cimetidine.¹¹ On histology, epidermal budlike proliferations can be appreciated in the dermis, and characteristic large, eosinophilic, intracytoplasmic inclusion or molluscum bodies are found in the epidermis.¹² 

The Diagnosis: Juvenile Dermatomyositis 

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare idiopathic inflammatory myopathy of childhood that is autoimmune in nature with an annual incidence ranging from 2.5 to 4.1 cases per million children. Its peak incidence is between 5 and 10 years of age, and it affects girls more than boys at a 2-fold to 5-fold greater rate.¹ Juvenile dermatomyositis is characterized by skeletal muscle weakness in the presence of distinctive rashes, including Gottron papules and heliotrope erythema. Muscle weakness typically is proximal and symmetrical, and eventually patients may have trouble rising from a seated position or lifting objects overhead. Other skin manifestations include nail fold capillary changes, calcinosis cutis, and less commonly ulcerations signifying vasculopathy of the skin.² A subset of patients will present with juvenile amyopathic dermatomyositis. These children have the characteristic skin changes without the muscle weakness or elevated muscle enzymes for more than 6 months; however, one-quarter may go on to develop mysositis.³ 

Diagnosis of JDM traditionally was based on the following 5 diagnostic criteria: characteristic skin rash, proximal muscle weakness, elevated muscle enzymes, myopathic changes on electromyogram, and typical muscle biopsy.¹ Current practice shows a broadening of diagnostic criteria using new techniques in the diagnosis of JDM. To make the diagnosis, the patient must have the characteristic skin manifestations with a minimum of 3 other criteria.⁴ A 2006 international consensus survey expanded the list of criteria to include typical findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nail fold capillaroscopy abnormalities, calcinosis, and
dysphonia.⁵  

To assess muscle disease, MRI is utilized because it is a reliable noninvasive tool to assess muscle inflammation. Muscle biopsy is only recommended if the diagnosis is unclear.⁵ The results of the MRI in our patient displayed symmetric mild fatty atrophy of the gluteus maximus muscle, as well as edema in the right rectus femoris and left vastus lateralis muscles, suggesting early findings of myositis. Muscle enzymes may not be diagnostic because  they are not always elevated at diagnosis. Our patient had a normal creatinine kinase level (92 U/L [reference range, <190 U/L]), and both aldolase and lactate dehydrogenase also were within reference range. Conversely, antinuclear antibodies frequently are positive in patients with JDM, such as in our patient at a 1:320 dilution, but are nonspecific and nondiagnostic. It is recommended to include nail fold capillaroscopy to evaluate periungual capillary changes because nailfold capillary density is a sensitive measure of both skin and muscle disease.⁵ Using dermoscopy, nail fold capillary dilation was observed in our patient. 

Other differential diagnoses can have somewhat similar clinical features to JDM. Infantile papular acrodermatitis, commonly referred to as Gianotti-Crosti syndrome, is a viral exanthem that affects children (median age, 2 years).⁶ The rash appears as monomorphous, flat-topped, pink to brown papules affecting the face, buttocks, and arms; it typically spontaneously resolves in 10 days.⁶ 

Juvenile-onset lupus is a chronic autoimmune disorder that can involve any organ system and typically affects children aged 11 to 12 years with a female preponderance. Skin manifestations are similar to adult-onset lupus and include malar rash, discoid rash, oral ulcerations, petechiae, palpable purpura, and digital telangiectasia and ulcers. ⁷ 

Juvenile scleroderma is rare connective-tissue disorder that also has multiple organ involvement. Cutaneous involvement can range from isolated morphealike plaques to diffuse sclerotic lesions with growth disturbances, contractures, and facial atrophy.⁸ 

Verrucae planae, commonly referred to as flat warts, are papules caused primarily by human papillomavirus types 3, 10, 28, and 41. Children and young adults commonly are affected, and warts can appear on the hands, as in our patient.⁶ 

Treatment of JDM depends on disease severity at initial presentation and requires a multidisciplinary approach. The mainstay of treatment is high-dose oral prednisone in combination with disease-modifying drugs such as methotrexate and cyclosporin A. Patients with more severe presentations (eg, ulcerative skin disease) or life-threatening organ involvement are treated with cyclophosphamide, usually in combination with high-dose glucocorticoids.⁹ 

Early detection with aggressive treatment is vital to reduce morbidity and mortality from organ damage and disease complications. Mortality rates have dropped to 3%¹⁰ in recent decades with the use of systemic glucocorticoids. Delayed treatment is associated with a prolonged disease course and poorer outcomes. Disease complications in children with JDM include osteoporosis, calcinosis, and intestinal perforation; however, with early treatment, children with JDM can expect full recovery and to live a normal life as compared to adults with dermatomyositis.¹⁰ 

Prior to our patient's diagnosis, the family was assigned to move to an overseas location through the US Military with no direct access to advanced medical care. Early detection and diagnosis of JDM through an astute clinical examination allowed the patient and her family to remain in the continental United States to continue receiving specialty care.   
 

The Diagnosis: Juvenile Dermatomyositis 

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare idiopathic inflammatory myopathy of childhood that is autoimmune in nature with an annual incidence ranging from 2.5 to 4.1 cases per million children. Its peak incidence is between 5 and 10 years of age, and it affects girls more than boys at a 2-fold to 5-fold greater rate.¹ Juvenile dermatomyositis is characterized by skeletal muscle weakness in the presence of distinctive rashes, including Gottron papules and heliotrope erythema. Muscle weakness typically is proximal and symmetrical, and eventually patients may have trouble rising from a seated position or lifting objects overhead. Other skin manifestations include nail fold capillary changes, calcinosis cutis, and less commonly ulcerations signifying vasculopathy of the skin.² A subset of patients will present with juvenile amyopathic dermatomyositis. These children have the characteristic skin changes without the muscle weakness or elevated muscle enzymes for more than 6 months; however, one-quarter may go on to develop mysositis.³ 

Diagnosis of JDM traditionally was based on the following 5 diagnostic criteria: characteristic skin rash, proximal muscle weakness, elevated muscle enzymes, myopathic changes on electromyogram, and typical muscle biopsy.¹ Current practice shows a broadening of diagnostic criteria using new techniques in the diagnosis of JDM. To make the diagnosis, the patient must have the characteristic skin manifestations with a minimum of 3 other criteria.⁴ A 2006 international consensus survey expanded the list of criteria to include typical findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nail fold capillaroscopy abnormalities, calcinosis, and
dysphonia.⁵  

To assess muscle disease, MRI is utilized because it is a reliable noninvasive tool to assess muscle inflammation. Muscle biopsy is only recommended if the diagnosis is unclear.⁵ The results of the MRI in our patient displayed symmetric mild fatty atrophy of the gluteus maximus muscle, as well as edema in the right rectus femoris and left vastus lateralis muscles, suggesting early findings of myositis. Muscle enzymes may not be diagnostic because  they are not always elevated at diagnosis. Our patient had a normal creatinine kinase level (92 U/L [reference range, <190 U/L]), and both aldolase and lactate dehydrogenase also were within reference range. Conversely, antinuclear antibodies frequently are positive in patients with JDM, such as in our patient at a 1:320 dilution, but are nonspecific and nondiagnostic. It is recommended to include nail fold capillaroscopy to evaluate periungual capillary changes because nailfold capillary density is a sensitive measure of both skin and muscle disease.⁵ Using dermoscopy, nail fold capillary dilation was observed in our patient. 

Other differential diagnoses can have somewhat similar clinical features to JDM. Infantile papular acrodermatitis, commonly referred to as Gianotti-Crosti syndrome, is a viral exanthem that affects children (median age, 2 years).⁶ The rash appears as monomorphous, flat-topped, pink to brown papules affecting the face, buttocks, and arms; it typically spontaneously resolves in 10 days.⁶ 

Juvenile-onset lupus is a chronic autoimmune disorder that can involve any organ system and typically affects children aged 11 to 12 years with a female preponderance. Skin manifestations are similar to adult-onset lupus and include malar rash, discoid rash, oral ulcerations, petechiae, palpable purpura, and digital telangiectasia and ulcers. ⁷ 

Juvenile scleroderma is rare connective-tissue disorder that also has multiple organ involvement. Cutaneous involvement can range from isolated morphealike plaques to diffuse sclerotic lesions with growth disturbances, contractures, and facial atrophy.⁸ 

Verrucae planae, commonly referred to as flat warts, are papules caused primarily by human papillomavirus types 3, 10, 28, and 41. Children and young adults commonly are affected, and warts can appear on the hands, as in our patient.⁶ 

Treatment of JDM depends on disease severity at initial presentation and requires a multidisciplinary approach. The mainstay of treatment is high-dose oral prednisone in combination with disease-modifying drugs such as methotrexate and cyclosporin A. Patients with more severe presentations (eg, ulcerative skin disease) or life-threatening organ involvement are treated with cyclophosphamide, usually in combination with high-dose glucocorticoids.⁹ 

Early detection with aggressive treatment is vital to reduce morbidity and mortality from organ damage and disease complications. Mortality rates have dropped to 3%¹⁰ in recent decades with the use of systemic glucocorticoids. Delayed treatment is associated with a prolonged disease course and poorer outcomes. Disease complications in children with JDM include osteoporosis, calcinosis, and intestinal perforation; however, with early treatment, children with JDM can expect full recovery and to live a normal life as compared to adults with dermatomyositis.¹⁰ 

Prior to our patient's diagnosis, the family was assigned to move to an overseas location through the US Military with no direct access to advanced medical care. Early detection and diagnosis of JDM through an astute clinical examination allowed the patient and her family to remain in the continental United States to continue receiving specialty care.   
 

The Diagnosis: Juvenile Dermatomyositis 

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare idiopathic inflammatory myopathy of childhood that is autoimmune in nature with an annual incidence ranging from 2.5 to 4.1 cases per million children. Its peak incidence is between 5 and 10 years of age, and it affects girls more than boys at a 2-fold to 5-fold greater rate.¹ Juvenile dermatomyositis is characterized by skeletal muscle weakness in the presence of distinctive rashes, including Gottron papules and heliotrope erythema. Muscle weakness typically is proximal and symmetrical, and eventually patients may have trouble rising from a seated position or lifting objects overhead. Other skin manifestations include nail fold capillary changes, calcinosis cutis, and less commonly ulcerations signifying vasculopathy of the skin.² A subset of patients will present with juvenile amyopathic dermatomyositis. These children have the characteristic skin changes without the muscle weakness or elevated muscle enzymes for more than 6 months; however, one-quarter may go on to develop mysositis.³ 

Diagnosis of JDM traditionally was based on the following 5 diagnostic criteria: characteristic skin rash, proximal muscle weakness, elevated muscle enzymes, myopathic changes on electromyogram, and typical muscle biopsy.¹ Current practice shows a broadening of diagnostic criteria using new techniques in the diagnosis of JDM. To make the diagnosis, the patient must have the characteristic skin manifestations with a minimum of 3 other criteria.⁴ A 2006 international consensus survey expanded the list of criteria to include typical findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nail fold capillaroscopy abnormalities, calcinosis, and
dysphonia.⁵  

To assess muscle disease, MRI is utilized because it is a reliable noninvasive tool to assess muscle inflammation. Muscle biopsy is only recommended if the diagnosis is unclear.⁵ The results of the MRI in our patient displayed symmetric mild fatty atrophy of the gluteus maximus muscle, as well as edema in the right rectus femoris and left vastus lateralis muscles, suggesting early findings of myositis. Muscle enzymes may not be diagnostic because  they are not always elevated at diagnosis. Our patient had a normal creatinine kinase level (92 U/L [reference range, <190 U/L]), and both aldolase and lactate dehydrogenase also were within reference range. Conversely, antinuclear antibodies frequently are positive in patients with JDM, such as in our patient at a 1:320 dilution, but are nonspecific and nondiagnostic. It is recommended to include nail fold capillaroscopy to evaluate periungual capillary changes because nailfold capillary density is a sensitive measure of both skin and muscle disease.⁵ Using dermoscopy, nail fold capillary dilation was observed in our patient. 

Other differential diagnoses can have somewhat similar clinical features to JDM. Infantile papular acrodermatitis, commonly referred to as Gianotti-Crosti syndrome, is a viral exanthem that affects children (median age, 2 years).⁶ The rash appears as monomorphous, flat-topped, pink to brown papules affecting the face, buttocks, and arms; it typically spontaneously resolves in 10 days.⁶ 

Juvenile-onset lupus is a chronic autoimmune disorder that can involve any organ system and typically affects children aged 11 to 12 years with a female preponderance. Skin manifestations are similar to adult-onset lupus and include malar rash, discoid rash, oral ulcerations, petechiae, palpable purpura, and digital telangiectasia and ulcers. ⁷ 

Juvenile scleroderma is rare connective-tissue disorder that also has multiple organ involvement. Cutaneous involvement can range from isolated morphealike plaques to diffuse sclerotic lesions with growth disturbances, contractures, and facial atrophy.⁸ 

Verrucae planae, commonly referred to as flat warts, are papules caused primarily by human papillomavirus types 3, 10, 28, and 41. Children and young adults commonly are affected, and warts can appear on the hands, as in our patient.⁶ 

Treatment of JDM depends on disease severity at initial presentation and requires a multidisciplinary approach. The mainstay of treatment is high-dose oral prednisone in combination with disease-modifying drugs such as methotrexate and cyclosporin A. Patients with more severe presentations (eg, ulcerative skin disease) or life-threatening organ involvement are treated with cyclophosphamide, usually in combination with high-dose glucocorticoids.⁹ 

Early detection with aggressive treatment is vital to reduce morbidity and mortality from organ damage and disease complications. Mortality rates have dropped to 3%¹⁰ in recent decades with the use of systemic glucocorticoids. Delayed treatment is associated with a prolonged disease course and poorer outcomes. Disease complications in children with JDM include osteoporosis, calcinosis, and intestinal perforation; however, with early treatment, children with JDM can expect full recovery and to live a normal life as compared to adults with dermatomyositis.¹⁰ 

Prior to our patient's diagnosis, the family was assigned to move to an overseas location through the US Military with no direct access to advanced medical care. Early detection and diagnosis of JDM through an astute clinical examination allowed the patient and her family to remain in the continental United States to continue receiving specialty care.   
 

The Diagnosis:  Primary Cutaneous Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumor  

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) were first described in 1996.¹ They comprise a family of rare mesenchymal neoplasms that have a unique characteristic of staining positive for melanocytic and smooth muscle markers on immunohistochemistry.² These neoplasms have been described in many areas of the body including the uterus, bladder, heart, pancreas, and prostate. The majority of PEComas are extracutaneous, with only 8% of reported cases originating on the skin.³ A case of primary cutaneous PEComa (pcPEComa) was described in 2003.⁴ The primary cutaneous form is extremely rare.^3,5-7  

A broad deep shave biopsy was performed in our patient in an attempt to sample the entire lesion. Histopathologic examination of the nodule demonstrated a dermal neoplasm comprised of a diffuse proliferation of large polygonal cells with abundant clear cytoplasm, fine chromatin, and prominent nucleoli (Figure 1A). Higher-power magnification showed moderate nuclear pleomorphism and only rare mitotic figures (Figure 1B).

Immunohistochemical staining revealed positivity for myomelanocytic markers with positivity for human melanoma black 45 (HMB-45)(Figure 2) and desmin (not shown). Additionally, the tumor was positive for CD163 and negative for smooth muscle actin, cytokeratin, and S-100 protein.  

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors are characterized histologically as mesenchymal neoplasms containing large epithelioid to spindled cells with a slightly granular, vacuolated cytoplasm. These cells often are found in close proximity to vascular structures.^3,5,8 The hallmark of PEComas is the expression of both melanocytic and muscle markers.^3,8 A review of staining patterns of pcPEComas emphasized that immunophenotypes between visceral and primary cutaneous forms may vary considerably.^3,5,8 The most consistent and sensitive melanocytic marker is HMB-45 (88%-92% positive).^3,8 Positive Melan-A staining varies in the literature from 0% to 50% of cases.³ Our patient's neoplasm expressed the characteristic myomelanocytic immunophenotype with both HMB-45 and desmin positivity. 

Given the histologic characteristics, these lesions can be mistaken for melanocytic and other nonmelanocytic tumors with a clear cell morphology such as balloon cell nevus, hypomelanotic blue nevus, and melanoma.^2,3 A pigmented case of pcPEComa was reported in 2015 and was originally diagnosed as metastatic melanoma.⁶ Unlike pcPEComa, melanoma usually stains positive with S-100 protein in up to 99% of cases⁸ and is negative for muscle markers; however, a case series reported S-100 protein positivity in 38% of pcPEComas.³ Nonmelanocytic neoplasms in the histologic differential diagnosis include clear cell sarcoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma, both of which show immunoreactivity for cytokeratin.⁹  

Histologic criteria exist for establishing malignancy potential for visceral PEComas but not for pcPEComas, though it has been suggested that the same malignancy criteria should be applied to pcPEComas.^3,9 Features associated with malignancy include size greater than 8 cm, mitotic activity greater than 1 mitosis per 50 high-power fields, infiltrative growth pattern, high nuclear grade, necrosis, and vascular invasion. Based on these criteria, fulfilling 2 or more features technically classifies the lesion as malignant, 1 feature classifies it as uncertain malignant potential, and a lack of these features renders the lesion benign.⁹  

The overwhelming majority of pcPEComas are considered benign. One case of pcPEComa was considered malignant with a high mitotic rate (5 mitoses per 10 high-power fields) and nuclear atypia.¹⁰ Further workup with thoracic computed tomography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography was negative for metastasis. Treatment with wide excision and radiotherapy was performed with no sign of recurrence at 24-month follow-up.¹⁰  

Although pcPEComas arising from the dermis seem to be benign overall, PEComas originating from the subcutaneous tissue may have greater malignancy potential. Two cases of subcutaneous PEComas presenting as nodules resulted in metastasis; one case had local nodal metastasis and another developed metastasis to the lungs months later.^10,11 

The Diagnosis:  Primary Cutaneous Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumor  

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) were first described in 1996.¹ They comprise a family of rare mesenchymal neoplasms that have a unique characteristic of staining positive for melanocytic and smooth muscle markers on immunohistochemistry.² These neoplasms have been described in many areas of the body including the uterus, bladder, heart, pancreas, and prostate. The majority of PEComas are extracutaneous, with only 8% of reported cases originating on the skin.³ A case of primary cutaneous PEComa (pcPEComa) was described in 2003.⁴ The primary cutaneous form is extremely rare.^3,5-7  

A broad deep shave biopsy was performed in our patient in an attempt to sample the entire lesion. Histopathologic examination of the nodule demonstrated a dermal neoplasm comprised of a diffuse proliferation of large polygonal cells with abundant clear cytoplasm, fine chromatin, and prominent nucleoli (Figure 1A). Higher-power magnification showed moderate nuclear pleomorphism and only rare mitotic figures (Figure 1B).

Immunohistochemical staining revealed positivity for myomelanocytic markers with positivity for human melanoma black 45 (HMB-45)(Figure 2) and desmin (not shown). Additionally, the tumor was positive for CD163 and negative for smooth muscle actin, cytokeratin, and S-100 protein.  

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors are characterized histologically as mesenchymal neoplasms containing large epithelioid to spindled cells with a slightly granular, vacuolated cytoplasm. These cells often are found in close proximity to vascular structures.^3,5,8 The hallmark of PEComas is the expression of both melanocytic and muscle markers.^3,8 A review of staining patterns of pcPEComas emphasized that immunophenotypes between visceral and primary cutaneous forms may vary considerably.^3,5,8 The most consistent and sensitive melanocytic marker is HMB-45 (88%-92% positive).^3,8 Positive Melan-A staining varies in the literature from 0% to 50% of cases.³ Our patient's neoplasm expressed the characteristic myomelanocytic immunophenotype with both HMB-45 and desmin positivity. 

Given the histologic characteristics, these lesions can be mistaken for melanocytic and other nonmelanocytic tumors with a clear cell morphology such as balloon cell nevus, hypomelanotic blue nevus, and melanoma.^2,3 A pigmented case of pcPEComa was reported in 2015 and was originally diagnosed as metastatic melanoma.⁶ Unlike pcPEComa, melanoma usually stains positive with S-100 protein in up to 99% of cases⁸ and is negative for muscle markers; however, a case series reported S-100 protein positivity in 38% of pcPEComas.³ Nonmelanocytic neoplasms in the histologic differential diagnosis include clear cell sarcoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma, both of which show immunoreactivity for cytokeratin.⁹  

Histologic criteria exist for establishing malignancy potential for visceral PEComas but not for pcPEComas, though it has been suggested that the same malignancy criteria should be applied to pcPEComas.^3,9 Features associated with malignancy include size greater than 8 cm, mitotic activity greater than 1 mitosis per 50 high-power fields, infiltrative growth pattern, high nuclear grade, necrosis, and vascular invasion. Based on these criteria, fulfilling 2 or more features technically classifies the lesion as malignant, 1 feature classifies it as uncertain malignant potential, and a lack of these features renders the lesion benign.⁹  

The overwhelming majority of pcPEComas are considered benign. One case of pcPEComa was considered malignant with a high mitotic rate (5 mitoses per 10 high-power fields) and nuclear atypia.¹⁰ Further workup with thoracic computed tomography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography was negative for metastasis. Treatment with wide excision and radiotherapy was performed with no sign of recurrence at 24-month follow-up.¹⁰  

Although pcPEComas arising from the dermis seem to be benign overall, PEComas originating from the subcutaneous tissue may have greater malignancy potential. Two cases of subcutaneous PEComas presenting as nodules resulted in metastasis; one case had local nodal metastasis and another developed metastasis to the lungs months later.^10,11 

The Diagnosis:  Primary Cutaneous Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumor  

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) were first described in 1996.¹ They comprise a family of rare mesenchymal neoplasms that have a unique characteristic of staining positive for melanocytic and smooth muscle markers on immunohistochemistry.² These neoplasms have been described in many areas of the body including the uterus, bladder, heart, pancreas, and prostate. The majority of PEComas are extracutaneous, with only 8% of reported cases originating on the skin.³ A case of primary cutaneous PEComa (pcPEComa) was described in 2003.⁴ The primary cutaneous form is extremely rare.^3,5-7  

A broad deep shave biopsy was performed in our patient in an attempt to sample the entire lesion. Histopathologic examination of the nodule demonstrated a dermal neoplasm comprised of a diffuse proliferation of large polygonal cells with abundant clear cytoplasm, fine chromatin, and prominent nucleoli (Figure 1A). Higher-power magnification showed moderate nuclear pleomorphism and only rare mitotic figures (Figure 1B).

Immunohistochemical staining revealed positivity for myomelanocytic markers with positivity for human melanoma black 45 (HMB-45)(Figure 2) and desmin (not shown). Additionally, the tumor was positive for CD163 and negative for smooth muscle actin, cytokeratin, and S-100 protein.  

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors are characterized histologically as mesenchymal neoplasms containing large epithelioid to spindled cells with a slightly granular, vacuolated cytoplasm. These cells often are found in close proximity to vascular structures.^3,5,8 The hallmark of PEComas is the expression of both melanocytic and muscle markers.^3,8 A review of staining patterns of pcPEComas emphasized that immunophenotypes between visceral and primary cutaneous forms may vary considerably.^3,5,8 The most consistent and sensitive melanocytic marker is HMB-45 (88%-92% positive).^3,8 Positive Melan-A staining varies in the literature from 0% to 50% of cases.³ Our patient's neoplasm expressed the characteristic myomelanocytic immunophenotype with both HMB-45 and desmin positivity. 

Given the histologic characteristics, these lesions can be mistaken for melanocytic and other nonmelanocytic tumors with a clear cell morphology such as balloon cell nevus, hypomelanotic blue nevus, and melanoma.^2,3 A pigmented case of pcPEComa was reported in 2015 and was originally diagnosed as metastatic melanoma.⁶ Unlike pcPEComa, melanoma usually stains positive with S-100 protein in up to 99% of cases⁸ and is negative for muscle markers; however, a case series reported S-100 protein positivity in 38% of pcPEComas.³ Nonmelanocytic neoplasms in the histologic differential diagnosis include clear cell sarcoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma, both of which show immunoreactivity for cytokeratin.⁹  

Histologic criteria exist for establishing malignancy potential for visceral PEComas but not for pcPEComas, though it has been suggested that the same malignancy criteria should be applied to pcPEComas.^3,9 Features associated with malignancy include size greater than 8 cm, mitotic activity greater than 1 mitosis per 50 high-power fields, infiltrative growth pattern, high nuclear grade, necrosis, and vascular invasion. Based on these criteria, fulfilling 2 or more features technically classifies the lesion as malignant, 1 feature classifies it as uncertain malignant potential, and a lack of these features renders the lesion benign.⁹  

The overwhelming majority of pcPEComas are considered benign. One case of pcPEComa was considered malignant with a high mitotic rate (5 mitoses per 10 high-power fields) and nuclear atypia.¹⁰ Further workup with thoracic computed tomography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography was negative for metastasis. Treatment with wide excision and radiotherapy was performed with no sign of recurrence at 24-month follow-up.¹⁰  

Although pcPEComas arising from the dermis seem to be benign overall, PEComas originating from the subcutaneous tissue may have greater malignancy potential. Two cases of subcutaneous PEComas presenting as nodules resulted in metastasis; one case had local nodal metastasis and another developed metastasis to the lungs months later.^10,11 

The Diagnosis: Disseminated Fusariosis  

Histologic evaluation of the punch biopsy demonstrated thrombosed vessels in the deep dermis and along fibrous septae of subcutaneous tissue, as well as delicate, thin-walled, branching hyphae with vesicular swellings (Figure). The hyphae were present within the vascular thrombi and extended into surrounding tissue. The fungal tissue culture eventually grew scant Fusarium. At the time of biopsy, there was a high index of suspicion for fungal infection, which supported the decision to empirically treat with anidulafungin and voriconazole.  

Differentiating the diagnosis in this case was done primarily with histopathology. Although Aspergillus also has slender hyphae, it lacks the vesicular swellings characteristic of fusariosis. Disseminated candidiasis would demonstrate budding yeast and pseudohyphae in the dermis. Ecthyma gangrenosum histologically presents as necrotizing hemorrhagic vasculitis with gram-negative rods in the walls of deeper vessels, characteristically sparing the intima. Leukemia cutis histologically varies but would display a neoplastic infiltrate of atypical monocytoid cells with nuclear pleomorphism.  

Our patient had been treated with palliative chemotherapy as a salvage regimen with idarubicin and cytarabine. She had persistent pancytopenia despite granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor therapy. The mortality rate for disseminated Fusarium infection approaches 100% when risk factors such as angiotropism and prolonged neutropenia are present.^1,2 Additionally, our patient's susceptibility profile subsequently demonstrated an elevated minimum inhibitory concentration to amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. The neutropenia and Fusarium infection were not responsive to treatment. She was discharged on palliative voriconazole with home hospice care.  

Fusarium species are soil-dwelling saprophytes and important plant pathogens that have increasingly emerged as rare but notable causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients.^1-3 More specifically, Fusarium infection is most commonly observed in patients with hematologic malignancy complicated by persistent neutropenia. The 3 most frequently encountered Fusarium species in human disease are Fusarium solani, Fusarium oxysporum, and Fusarium moniliforme, with F solani being the most virulent.^1,2 Infection with Fusarium may manifest as a broad range of presentations depending on the route of entry, such as endophthalmitis, sinusitis, pneumonia, and cutaneous lesions.¹ Disseminated infection is marked by skin lesions or positive blood cultures for Fusarium.³ This fungus is notorious for its limited susceptibility profile.¹ It requires systemic antifungal medications such as triazoles and amphotericin B. Fusarium is most susceptible in vitro to amphotericin B but often requires toxic dosages to be effective in decreasing fungal load.^2,3 The high mortality rate of disseminated fusariosis further emphasizes that prevention is an important component to protecting high-risk patients. Keeping patients in rooms with high-efficiency particulate arresting filters and limiting exposure to unsanitized tap water faucets can help decrease exposure; however, reducing immunosuppression and improving neutropenia are the most effective ways to prevent fusariosis.¹ Although skin breakdown can facilitate the spread of infection, it has been observed that immunosuppressed individuals do not necessarily have this finding.⁴ 

This case emphasizes the importance of considering disseminated fusariosis in patients with hematologic malignancy or other immunosuppressed conditions. The most important factors that should raise clinical suspicion are persistent neutropenia and recent corticosteroid therapy.¹ A clinical picture that suggests fungal infection should warrant consideration of prophylactic treatment as well as tissue and blood cultures to determine species and susceptibility.  
 

The Diagnosis: Disseminated Fusariosis  

Histologic evaluation of the punch biopsy demonstrated thrombosed vessels in the deep dermis and along fibrous septae of subcutaneous tissue, as well as delicate, thin-walled, branching hyphae with vesicular swellings (Figure). The hyphae were present within the vascular thrombi and extended into surrounding tissue. The fungal tissue culture eventually grew scant Fusarium. At the time of biopsy, there was a high index of suspicion for fungal infection, which supported the decision to empirically treat with anidulafungin and voriconazole.  

Differentiating the diagnosis in this case was done primarily with histopathology. Although Aspergillus also has slender hyphae, it lacks the vesicular swellings characteristic of fusariosis. Disseminated candidiasis would demonstrate budding yeast and pseudohyphae in the dermis. Ecthyma gangrenosum histologically presents as necrotizing hemorrhagic vasculitis with gram-negative rods in the walls of deeper vessels, characteristically sparing the intima. Leukemia cutis histologically varies but would display a neoplastic infiltrate of atypical monocytoid cells with nuclear pleomorphism.  

Our patient had been treated with palliative chemotherapy as a salvage regimen with idarubicin and cytarabine. She had persistent pancytopenia despite granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor therapy. The mortality rate for disseminated Fusarium infection approaches 100% when risk factors such as angiotropism and prolonged neutropenia are present.^1,2 Additionally, our patient's susceptibility profile subsequently demonstrated an elevated minimum inhibitory concentration to amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. The neutropenia and Fusarium infection were not responsive to treatment. She was discharged on palliative voriconazole with home hospice care.  

Fusarium species are soil-dwelling saprophytes and important plant pathogens that have increasingly emerged as rare but notable causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients.^1-3 More specifically, Fusarium infection is most commonly observed in patients with hematologic malignancy complicated by persistent neutropenia. The 3 most frequently encountered Fusarium species in human disease are Fusarium solani, Fusarium oxysporum, and Fusarium moniliforme, with F solani being the most virulent.^1,2 Infection with Fusarium may manifest as a broad range of presentations depending on the route of entry, such as endophthalmitis, sinusitis, pneumonia, and cutaneous lesions.¹ Disseminated infection is marked by skin lesions or positive blood cultures for Fusarium.³ This fungus is notorious for its limited susceptibility profile.¹ It requires systemic antifungal medications such as triazoles and amphotericin B. Fusarium is most susceptible in vitro to amphotericin B but often requires toxic dosages to be effective in decreasing fungal load.^2,3 The high mortality rate of disseminated fusariosis further emphasizes that prevention is an important component to protecting high-risk patients. Keeping patients in rooms with high-efficiency particulate arresting filters and limiting exposure to unsanitized tap water faucets can help decrease exposure; however, reducing immunosuppression and improving neutropenia are the most effective ways to prevent fusariosis.¹ Although skin breakdown can facilitate the spread of infection, it has been observed that immunosuppressed individuals do not necessarily have this finding.⁴ 

This case emphasizes the importance of considering disseminated fusariosis in patients with hematologic malignancy or other immunosuppressed conditions. The most important factors that should raise clinical suspicion are persistent neutropenia and recent corticosteroid therapy.¹ A clinical picture that suggests fungal infection should warrant consideration of prophylactic treatment as well as tissue and blood cultures to determine species and susceptibility.  
 

The Diagnosis: Disseminated Fusariosis  

Histologic evaluation of the punch biopsy demonstrated thrombosed vessels in the deep dermis and along fibrous septae of subcutaneous tissue, as well as delicate, thin-walled, branching hyphae with vesicular swellings (Figure). The hyphae were present within the vascular thrombi and extended into surrounding tissue. The fungal tissue culture eventually grew scant Fusarium. At the time of biopsy, there was a high index of suspicion for fungal infection, which supported the decision to empirically treat with anidulafungin and voriconazole.  

Differentiating the diagnosis in this case was done primarily with histopathology. Although Aspergillus also has slender hyphae, it lacks the vesicular swellings characteristic of fusariosis. Disseminated candidiasis would demonstrate budding yeast and pseudohyphae in the dermis. Ecthyma gangrenosum histologically presents as necrotizing hemorrhagic vasculitis with gram-negative rods in the walls of deeper vessels, characteristically sparing the intima. Leukemia cutis histologically varies but would display a neoplastic infiltrate of atypical monocytoid cells with nuclear pleomorphism.  

Our patient had been treated with palliative chemotherapy as a salvage regimen with idarubicin and cytarabine. She had persistent pancytopenia despite granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor therapy. The mortality rate for disseminated Fusarium infection approaches 100% when risk factors such as angiotropism and prolonged neutropenia are present.^1,2 Additionally, our patient's susceptibility profile subsequently demonstrated an elevated minimum inhibitory concentration to amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. The neutropenia and Fusarium infection were not responsive to treatment. She was discharged on palliative voriconazole with home hospice care.  

Fusarium species are soil-dwelling saprophytes and important plant pathogens that have increasingly emerged as rare but notable causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients.^1-3 More specifically, Fusarium infection is most commonly observed in patients with hematologic malignancy complicated by persistent neutropenia. The 3 most frequently encountered Fusarium species in human disease are Fusarium solani, Fusarium oxysporum, and Fusarium moniliforme, with F solani being the most virulent.^1,2 Infection with Fusarium may manifest as a broad range of presentations depending on the route of entry, such as endophthalmitis, sinusitis, pneumonia, and cutaneous lesions.¹ Disseminated infection is marked by skin lesions or positive blood cultures for Fusarium.³ This fungus is notorious for its limited susceptibility profile.¹ It requires systemic antifungal medications such as triazoles and amphotericin B. Fusarium is most susceptible in vitro to amphotericin B but often requires toxic dosages to be effective in decreasing fungal load.^2,3 The high mortality rate of disseminated fusariosis further emphasizes that prevention is an important component to protecting high-risk patients. Keeping patients in rooms with high-efficiency particulate arresting filters and limiting exposure to unsanitized tap water faucets can help decrease exposure; however, reducing immunosuppression and improving neutropenia are the most effective ways to prevent fusariosis.¹ Although skin breakdown can facilitate the spread of infection, it has been observed that immunosuppressed individuals do not necessarily have this finding.⁴ 

This case emphasizes the importance of considering disseminated fusariosis in patients with hematologic malignancy or other immunosuppressed conditions. The most important factors that should raise clinical suspicion are persistent neutropenia and recent corticosteroid therapy.¹ A clinical picture that suggests fungal infection should warrant consideration of prophylactic treatment as well as tissue and blood cultures to determine species and susceptibility.  
 

Microcystic lymphatic malformations, also known as lymphangioma circumscriptum, are rare hamar­tomatous lesions comprised of dilated lymphatic channels that can be both congenital and acquired.¹ They often present as translucent or hemorrhagic ves­icles of varying sizes that may contain lymphatic fluid and often can cluster together and appear verrucous (Figure 1). The differential diagnosis for microcystic lym­phatic malformations commonly includes molluscum contagiosum, squamous cell carcinoma, verruca vulgaris, or condylomas, as well as atypical vascular lesions. They most often are found in children as congenital lesions but also may be acquired. Most acquired cases are due to chronic inflammatory and scarring processes that damage lymphatic structures, including surgery, radiation, infec­tions, and even Crohn disease.^2,3 Because the differential diagnosis is so broad and the disease can clinically mimic other common disease processes, biopsies often are per­formed to determine the diagnosis. On biopsy, pathologic examination revealed well-circumscribed nodular lesions with large lymphatic channels often in a background of connective tissue stroma. Increased eosinophilic mate­rial, including mast cells, also was seen (Figure 2A). On immunohistochemistry, staining showed D2-40 posi­tivity (Figure 2B). 

Damage to lymphatics from radiation and postsurgi­cal excision of tumors are well-described causes of micro­cystic lymphatic malformations, as in our patient, with most instances in the literature occurring secondary to treatment of breast or cervical cancer.^4-6 In these acquired cases, the pathogenesis is thought to be due to destruc­tion and fibrosis at the layer of the reticular dermis, which causes lymphatic obstruction and subsequent dilation of superficial lymphatic channels.⁶ 

Microcystic lymphatic malformations can be difficult to distinguish from atypical vascular lesions, another common postradiation lesion. Both are benign well-circumscribed lesions that histologically do not extend into surrounding subcutaneous tissues and do not have multilayering of cells, mitosis, or hemorrhage.⁷ Although lymphatic lesions tend to form vesicles, atypical vas­cular lesions arising after radiation treatment present as erythematous or flesh-colored patches or papules. They also tend to be fairly superficial and often only involve the superficial to mid dermis. On histology they show thin-walled channels without erythrocytes that are lined by typical endothelial cells.⁷ Despite these differ­ences, both clinically and histopathologically these lesions can appear similar to acquired microcystic lymphatic malformations. It is important to differentiate between these two entities, as atypical vascular lesions have a slightly higher rate of transformation into malignant tumors such as angiosarcomas. 

Although angiosarcomas clinically may present as ery­thematous patches, plaques, or nodules similar to benign postradiation lesions, they tend to be more edematous than their benign counterparts.^7,8 Two other clinical fac­tors that can help determine if a postradiation lesion is benign or malignant are the size and time of onset of the lesion. Angiosarcomas tend to be much larger than benign postradiation lesions (median size, 7.5 cm) and tend to be more multifocal in nature.^8,9 They also tend to arise on average 5 to 7 years after the initial radiation treatment, while benign lesions arise sooner.⁹ 

Small, asymptomatic, acquired microcystic lymphatic malformations can be followed clinically without treat­ment, but these lesions do not commonly regress spon­taneously. Even when asymptomatic, many clinicians will opt for treatment to prevent secondary complications such as infections, drainage, and pain. Moreover, these lesions can have notable psychosocial impacts on patients due to poor cosmetic appearance. Unfortunately, there is no gold standard of treatment, and recurrence is com­mon, even after treatment. Historically, surgical excision was the treatment of choice, but this option carries a high risk for scarring, invasiveness, and recurrence. Recurrence rates of up to 23.1% have been reported with decreased effectiveness of resection, particularly in areas of deeper involvement.¹⁰ For these deeper lesions, CO2 laser therapy is a promising evolving therapy. It can penetrate up to the mid dermis and seems to destroy the lymphatic chan­nels between deep and surface lymphatics, preventing the cutaneous manifestations of the disease. It has the added benefit of minimal invasiveness and fewer side effects than complete excision, with most studies report­ing hyperpigmentation and scarring as the most common side effects.¹¹ Additional emerging therapies including sclerotherapy and isotretinoin have shown benefits in case studies. Sclerotherapy causes local tissue destruction and thrombosis leading to destruction of vessel lumens and fibrosis that halts disease progression and clears existing lesions.¹² Oral therapy with isotretinoin appears to work by inhibiting certain cytokines and acting as an antiangiogenic factor.¹³ Given the rarity of microcystic lymphatic malformations, further research must be done to determine definitive treatment. 

Acquired microcystic lymphatic malformation is an important sequela of radiation therapy and surgical exci­sion of malignancy. Despite its striking clinical appear­ance, it is sometimes difficult to diagnose given its rarity. It is important that clinicians are able to recognize it clini­cally and understand common treatment options to pre­vent both the mental stigma and complications, including secondary infections, drainage, and pain. 

Microcystic lymphatic malformations, also known as lymphangioma circumscriptum, are rare hamar­tomatous lesions comprised of dilated lymphatic channels that can be both congenital and acquired.¹ They often present as translucent or hemorrhagic ves­icles of varying sizes that may contain lymphatic fluid and often can cluster together and appear verrucous (Figure 1). The differential diagnosis for microcystic lym­phatic malformations commonly includes molluscum contagiosum, squamous cell carcinoma, verruca vulgaris, or condylomas, as well as atypical vascular lesions. They most often are found in children as congenital lesions but also may be acquired. Most acquired cases are due to chronic inflammatory and scarring processes that damage lymphatic structures, including surgery, radiation, infec­tions, and even Crohn disease.^2,3 Because the differential diagnosis is so broad and the disease can clinically mimic other common disease processes, biopsies often are per­formed to determine the diagnosis. On biopsy, pathologic examination revealed well-circumscribed nodular lesions with large lymphatic channels often in a background of connective tissue stroma. Increased eosinophilic mate­rial, including mast cells, also was seen (Figure 2A). On immunohistochemistry, staining showed D2-40 posi­tivity (Figure 2B). 

Damage to lymphatics from radiation and postsurgi­cal excision of tumors are well-described causes of micro­cystic lymphatic malformations, as in our patient, with most instances in the literature occurring secondary to treatment of breast or cervical cancer.^4-6 In these acquired cases, the pathogenesis is thought to be due to destruc­tion and fibrosis at the layer of the reticular dermis, which causes lymphatic obstruction and subsequent dilation of superficial lymphatic channels.⁶ 

Microcystic lymphatic malformations can be difficult to distinguish from atypical vascular lesions, another common postradiation lesion. Both are benign well-circumscribed lesions that histologically do not extend into surrounding subcutaneous tissues and do not have multilayering of cells, mitosis, or hemorrhage.⁷ Although lymphatic lesions tend to form vesicles, atypical vas­cular lesions arising after radiation treatment present as erythematous or flesh-colored patches or papules. They also tend to be fairly superficial and often only involve the superficial to mid dermis. On histology they show thin-walled channels without erythrocytes that are lined by typical endothelial cells.⁷ Despite these differ­ences, both clinically and histopathologically these lesions can appear similar to acquired microcystic lymphatic malformations. It is important to differentiate between these two entities, as atypical vascular lesions have a slightly higher rate of transformation into malignant tumors such as angiosarcomas. 

Although angiosarcomas clinically may present as ery­thematous patches, plaques, or nodules similar to benign postradiation lesions, they tend to be more edematous than their benign counterparts.^7,8 Two other clinical fac­tors that can help determine if a postradiation lesion is benign or malignant are the size and time of onset of the lesion. Angiosarcomas tend to be much larger than benign postradiation lesions (median size, 7.5 cm) and tend to be more multifocal in nature.^8,9 They also tend to arise on average 5 to 7 years after the initial radiation treatment, while benign lesions arise sooner.⁹ 

Small, asymptomatic, acquired microcystic lymphatic malformations can be followed clinically without treat­ment, but these lesions do not commonly regress spon­taneously. Even when asymptomatic, many clinicians will opt for treatment to prevent secondary complications such as infections, drainage, and pain. Moreover, these lesions can have notable psychosocial impacts on patients due to poor cosmetic appearance. Unfortunately, there is no gold standard of treatment, and recurrence is com­mon, even after treatment. Historically, surgical excision was the treatment of choice, but this option carries a high risk for scarring, invasiveness, and recurrence. Recurrence rates of up to 23.1% have been reported with decreased effectiveness of resection, particularly in areas of deeper involvement.¹⁰ For these deeper lesions, CO2 laser therapy is a promising evolving therapy. It can penetrate up to the mid dermis and seems to destroy the lymphatic chan­nels between deep and surface lymphatics, preventing the cutaneous manifestations of the disease. It has the added benefit of minimal invasiveness and fewer side effects than complete excision, with most studies report­ing hyperpigmentation and scarring as the most common side effects.¹¹ Additional emerging therapies including sclerotherapy and isotretinoin have shown benefits in case studies. Sclerotherapy causes local tissue destruction and thrombosis leading to destruction of vessel lumens and fibrosis that halts disease progression and clears existing lesions.¹² Oral therapy with isotretinoin appears to work by inhibiting certain cytokines and acting as an antiangiogenic factor.¹³ Given the rarity of microcystic lymphatic malformations, further research must be done to determine definitive treatment. 

Acquired microcystic lymphatic malformation is an important sequela of radiation therapy and surgical exci­sion of malignancy. Despite its striking clinical appear­ance, it is sometimes difficult to diagnose given its rarity. It is important that clinicians are able to recognize it clini­cally and understand common treatment options to pre­vent both the mental stigma and complications, including secondary infections, drainage, and pain. 

Microcystic lymphatic malformations, also known as lymphangioma circumscriptum, are rare hamar­tomatous lesions comprised of dilated lymphatic channels that can be both congenital and acquired.¹ They often present as translucent or hemorrhagic ves­icles of varying sizes that may contain lymphatic fluid and often can cluster together and appear verrucous (Figure 1). The differential diagnosis for microcystic lym­phatic malformations commonly includes molluscum contagiosum, squamous cell carcinoma, verruca vulgaris, or condylomas, as well as atypical vascular lesions. They most often are found in children as congenital lesions but also may be acquired. Most acquired cases are due to chronic inflammatory and scarring processes that damage lymphatic structures, including surgery, radiation, infec­tions, and even Crohn disease.^2,3 Because the differential diagnosis is so broad and the disease can clinically mimic other common disease processes, biopsies often are per­formed to determine the diagnosis. On biopsy, pathologic examination revealed well-circumscribed nodular lesions with large lymphatic channels often in a background of connective tissue stroma. Increased eosinophilic mate­rial, including mast cells, also was seen (Figure 2A). On immunohistochemistry, staining showed D2-40 posi­tivity (Figure 2B). 

Damage to lymphatics from radiation and postsurgi­cal excision of tumors are well-described causes of micro­cystic lymphatic malformations, as in our patient, with most instances in the literature occurring secondary to treatment of breast or cervical cancer.^4-6 In these acquired cases, the pathogenesis is thought to be due to destruc­tion and fibrosis at the layer of the reticular dermis, which causes lymphatic obstruction and subsequent dilation of superficial lymphatic channels.⁶ 

Microcystic lymphatic malformations can be difficult to distinguish from atypical vascular lesions, another common postradiation lesion. Both are benign well-circumscribed lesions that histologically do not extend into surrounding subcutaneous tissues and do not have multilayering of cells, mitosis, or hemorrhage.⁷ Although lymphatic lesions tend to form vesicles, atypical vas­cular lesions arising after radiation treatment present as erythematous or flesh-colored patches or papules. They also tend to be fairly superficial and often only involve the superficial to mid dermis. On histology they show thin-walled channels without erythrocytes that are lined by typical endothelial cells.⁷ Despite these differ­ences, both clinically and histopathologically these lesions can appear similar to acquired microcystic lymphatic malformations. It is important to differentiate between these two entities, as atypical vascular lesions have a slightly higher rate of transformation into malignant tumors such as angiosarcomas. 

Although angiosarcomas clinically may present as ery­thematous patches, plaques, or nodules similar to benign postradiation lesions, they tend to be more edematous than their benign counterparts.^7,8 Two other clinical fac­tors that can help determine if a postradiation lesion is benign or malignant are the size and time of onset of the lesion. Angiosarcomas tend to be much larger than benign postradiation lesions (median size, 7.5 cm) and tend to be more multifocal in nature.^8,9 They also tend to arise on average 5 to 7 years after the initial radiation treatment, while benign lesions arise sooner.⁹ 

Small, asymptomatic, acquired microcystic lymphatic malformations can be followed clinically without treat­ment, but these lesions do not commonly regress spon­taneously. Even when asymptomatic, many clinicians will opt for treatment to prevent secondary complications such as infections, drainage, and pain. Moreover, these lesions can have notable psychosocial impacts on patients due to poor cosmetic appearance. Unfortunately, there is no gold standard of treatment, and recurrence is com­mon, even after treatment. Historically, surgical excision was the treatment of choice, but this option carries a high risk for scarring, invasiveness, and recurrence. Recurrence rates of up to 23.1% have been reported with decreased effectiveness of resection, particularly in areas of deeper involvement.¹⁰ For these deeper lesions, CO2 laser therapy is a promising evolving therapy. It can penetrate up to the mid dermis and seems to destroy the lymphatic chan­nels between deep and surface lymphatics, preventing the cutaneous manifestations of the disease. It has the added benefit of minimal invasiveness and fewer side effects than complete excision, with most studies report­ing hyperpigmentation and scarring as the most common side effects.¹¹ Additional emerging therapies including sclerotherapy and isotretinoin have shown benefits in case studies. Sclerotherapy causes local tissue destruction and thrombosis leading to destruction of vessel lumens and fibrosis that halts disease progression and clears existing lesions.¹² Oral therapy with isotretinoin appears to work by inhibiting certain cytokines and acting as an antiangiogenic factor.¹³ Given the rarity of microcystic lymphatic malformations, further research must be done to determine definitive treatment. 

Acquired microcystic lymphatic malformation is an important sequela of radiation therapy and surgical exci­sion of malignancy. Despite its striking clinical appear­ance, it is sometimes difficult to diagnose given its rarity. It is important that clinicians are able to recognize it clini­cally and understand common treatment options to pre­vent both the mental stigma and complications, including secondary infections, drainage, and pain. 

Sarcoidosis is a systemic noncaseating granuloma­tous disease of unknown etiology. The skin is the second most common location for disease mani­festation following the lungs.¹ Cutaneous sarcoidosis is present in 35% of patients with sarcoidosis and may be further subtyped by its morphologic characteristics (eg, hyperpigmented, papular, nodular, atrophic, ulcer­ative, psoriasiform). Cutaneous sarcoidosis has an increased tendency to occur at areas of prior injury such as surgeries or tattoos.² Although sarcoidosis affects all races and sexes, it is more prevalent in women and in the black population.³ 

The clinical presentation of sarcoidosis is difficult due to its morphologic variation, allowing for a wide differential diagnosis. With our patient’s presentation of atrophic plaques, the differential diagnosis included granuloma annulare, necrobiosis lipoidica, tumid lupus erythematosus, leprosy, and sarcoidosis; however, biopsy is required for definitive diagnosis. The characteristic histopathology for cutaneous sarcoidosis includes nonca­seating granulomas (Figure, A) composed of epithelioid histiocytes with giant cells surrounded by a lympho­cytic infiltrate. Noncaseating granulomas are consid­ered specific to sarcoidosis and are present in 71% to 89% of biopsied lesions.⁴ Interestingly, our patient pre­sented with a rare subtype of atrophic ulcerative cutane­ous sarcoidosis, necrobiosis lipoidica–like sarcoidosis, which is more common in females and in the black population. It is characterized by pink to violaceous plaques with depressed centers and prominent necrotiz­ing granuloma (Figure, B) on histopathology. In a small case series, all 3 patients with necrobiosis lipoidica–like sarcoidosis were female and had systemic involvement at the time of diagnosis.⁵ 

Sarcoidosis typically is a systemic disease with only a limited number of cases presenting with isolated cutane­ous findings. Therefore, patients require a systemic evalu­ation, which may include a chest radiograph, complete blood cell count, ophthalmologic examinations, thyroid testing, and vitamin D monitoring, as well as an echocar­diogram and electrocardiogram.² 

Treatment is guided by the severity of disease. For isolated cutaneous lesions, topical or intralesional high-potency steroids have been shown to be effective.^6,7 Several studies also have shown phototherapy and laser therapy as well as surgical excision to be beneficial.^8-10 Once cutaneous lesions become disfiguring or systemic involvement is found, systemic corticosteroids or other immunomodulatory medications may be warranted.¹¹ Our patient was started on intralesional and topical high-potency steroids, which failed, and she was transitioned to methotrexate and adalimumab. Unfortunately, even with advanced therapies, our patient did not have notableresolution of the lesions.

Sarcoidosis is a systemic noncaseating granuloma­tous disease of unknown etiology. The skin is the second most common location for disease mani­festation following the lungs.¹ Cutaneous sarcoidosis is present in 35% of patients with sarcoidosis and may be further subtyped by its morphologic characteristics (eg, hyperpigmented, papular, nodular, atrophic, ulcer­ative, psoriasiform). Cutaneous sarcoidosis has an increased tendency to occur at areas of prior injury such as surgeries or tattoos.² Although sarcoidosis affects all races and sexes, it is more prevalent in women and in the black population.³ 

The clinical presentation of sarcoidosis is difficult due to its morphologic variation, allowing for a wide differential diagnosis. With our patient’s presentation of atrophic plaques, the differential diagnosis included granuloma annulare, necrobiosis lipoidica, tumid lupus erythematosus, leprosy, and sarcoidosis; however, biopsy is required for definitive diagnosis. The characteristic histopathology for cutaneous sarcoidosis includes nonca­seating granulomas (Figure, A) composed of epithelioid histiocytes with giant cells surrounded by a lympho­cytic infiltrate. Noncaseating granulomas are consid­ered specific to sarcoidosis and are present in 71% to 89% of biopsied lesions.⁴ Interestingly, our patient pre­sented with a rare subtype of atrophic ulcerative cutane­ous sarcoidosis, necrobiosis lipoidica–like sarcoidosis, which is more common in females and in the black population. It is characterized by pink to violaceous plaques with depressed centers and prominent necrotiz­ing granuloma (Figure, B) on histopathology. In a small case series, all 3 patients with necrobiosis lipoidica–like sarcoidosis were female and had systemic involvement at the time of diagnosis.⁵ 

Sarcoidosis typically is a systemic disease with only a limited number of cases presenting with isolated cutane­ous findings. Therefore, patients require a systemic evalu­ation, which may include a chest radiograph, complete blood cell count, ophthalmologic examinations, thyroid testing, and vitamin D monitoring, as well as an echocar­diogram and electrocardiogram.² 

Treatment is guided by the severity of disease. For isolated cutaneous lesions, topical or intralesional high-potency steroids have been shown to be effective.^6,7 Several studies also have shown phototherapy and laser therapy as well as surgical excision to be beneficial.^8-10 Once cutaneous lesions become disfiguring or systemic involvement is found, systemic corticosteroids or other immunomodulatory medications may be warranted.¹¹ Our patient was started on intralesional and topical high-potency steroids, which failed, and she was transitioned to methotrexate and adalimumab. Unfortunately, even with advanced therapies, our patient did not have notableresolution of the lesions.

Sarcoidosis is a systemic noncaseating granuloma­tous disease of unknown etiology. The skin is the second most common location for disease mani­festation following the lungs.¹ Cutaneous sarcoidosis is present in 35% of patients with sarcoidosis and may be further subtyped by its morphologic characteristics (eg, hyperpigmented, papular, nodular, atrophic, ulcer­ative, psoriasiform). Cutaneous sarcoidosis has an increased tendency to occur at areas of prior injury such as surgeries or tattoos.² Although sarcoidosis affects all races and sexes, it is more prevalent in women and in the black population.³ 

The clinical presentation of sarcoidosis is difficult due to its morphologic variation, allowing for a wide differential diagnosis. With our patient’s presentation of atrophic plaques, the differential diagnosis included granuloma annulare, necrobiosis lipoidica, tumid lupus erythematosus, leprosy, and sarcoidosis; however, biopsy is required for definitive diagnosis. The characteristic histopathology for cutaneous sarcoidosis includes nonca­seating granulomas (Figure, A) composed of epithelioid histiocytes with giant cells surrounded by a lympho­cytic infiltrate. Noncaseating granulomas are consid­ered specific to sarcoidosis and are present in 71% to 89% of biopsied lesions.⁴ Interestingly, our patient pre­sented with a rare subtype of atrophic ulcerative cutane­ous sarcoidosis, necrobiosis lipoidica–like sarcoidosis, which is more common in females and in the black population. It is characterized by pink to violaceous plaques with depressed centers and prominent necrotiz­ing granuloma (Figure, B) on histopathology. In a small case series, all 3 patients with necrobiosis lipoidica–like sarcoidosis were female and had systemic involvement at the time of diagnosis.⁵ 

Sarcoidosis typically is a systemic disease with only a limited number of cases presenting with isolated cutane­ous findings. Therefore, patients require a systemic evalu­ation, which may include a chest radiograph, complete blood cell count, ophthalmologic examinations, thyroid testing, and vitamin D monitoring, as well as an echocar­diogram and electrocardiogram.² 

Treatment is guided by the severity of disease. For isolated cutaneous lesions, topical or intralesional high-potency steroids have been shown to be effective.^6,7 Several studies also have shown phototherapy and laser therapy as well as surgical excision to be beneficial.^8-10 Once cutaneous lesions become disfiguring or systemic involvement is found, systemic corticosteroids or other immunomodulatory medications may be warranted.¹¹ Our patient was started on intralesional and topical high-potency steroids, which failed, and she was transitioned to methotrexate and adalimumab. Unfortunately, even with advanced therapies, our patient did not have notableresolution of the lesions.

The Diagnosis: Phytophotodermatitis

Initially, there was concern for autoimmune or connective tissue disease because of the edematous plaques localized over sun-exposed regions of the hands with marked sparing of the knuckles. Lupus erythematosus (LE), mixed connective tissue disease, CREST (calcinosis, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal motility disorders, sclerodactyly, telangiectasia) syndrome, dermatomyositis (DM), and erythromelalgia all were considered. Common disorders such as contact dermatitis and phytophotodermatitis remained in the differential diagnosis, though the patient adamantly denied any recent exposures. As part of the initial workup, laboratory studies including a complete blood cell count, comprehensive metabolic panel, serum lactate dehydrogenase, serum creatinine kinase, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and an antinuclear antibody panel were performed. Additionally, a punch biopsy at the border of the lesion was performed.

Lupus erythematosus was considered given the patient’s age and sex and the photoexposed location of the plaques. The photosensitive rash of LE classically affects the dorsal aspects of the hands while sparing the interphalangeal joints.^1,2 However, the patient had no nail fold findings consistent with systemic LE with no evidence of erythema or dilated tortuous vessels.³ Furthermore, there were no other cutaneous symptoms, and there was a negative review of systems, including malar/discoid rash, oral ulcers, photosensitivity, history of hematologic abnormalities, and end organ damage.^4,5 A negative antinuclear antibody serologic panel combined with a negative review of systems made the diagnosis of LE less likely.

Given the presenting clinical appearance, DM also was considered. Dermatomyositis traditionally displays ragged cuticular dystrophy with nail fold telangiectasia, mechanic hands, and involvement of the dorsal aspects of the hands with violaceous accentuation of the knuckles.⁶ The patient reported pruritus, which is common among DM patients; however, the nail folds were unaffected.⁷ Finally, she demonstrated sparing rather than involvement of the knuckles, which would be an unlikely presentation for DM.⁶

CREST syndrome, systemic sclerosis, and syndromes with overlapping features such as mixed connective tissue disease also were considered. The cutaneous features of CREST syndrome are characterized by initial edema of the digits with a subsequent taut and shiny indurated phase. Flexion contractures, ulceration, tapering of the digits, and loss of cutaneous fat pads can progressively occur.^8,9 Raynaud phenomenon is a common early finding in CREST syndrome or systemic sclerosis, and patients may develop ice pick digital infarcts and calcinosis in progressed disease.⁸ Common nail fold findings include periungual telangiectasia with dropout areas.^10,11 The marked edema and white discoloration of the knuckles in this patient could be mistaken for Raynaud phenomenon; however, she lacked pain or cold sensitivity and her discoloration was static.¹² Without sclerodermoid changes, nail fold findings, matted telangiectasia, taut skin, or systemic findings, a diagnosis of CREST syndrome, scleroderma, or other mixed connective tissue disease would be unlikely.⁸

Erythromelalgia is a clinical syndrome characterized by burning pain, erythema, and increased skin temperature that intermittently affects both the arms and legs. This rare disorder can be further classified into type 1 (associated with thrombocytopenia), type 2 (primary or idiopathic), and type 3 (associated with other medical cause excluding thrombocytopenia).^1,13 The patient endorsed some discomfort from the lesions but denied any subjective feeling of burning pain or increased skin temperature. Additionally, she had no family history of inheritable skin disorders and no personal history of polycythemia. Consequently, erythromelalgia remained less likely on the differential diagnosis.

The histology of the acral skin revealed mild focal spongiosis with no increase in dermal mucin on colloidal iron or mucopolysaccharide stains (Figure). After receiving the biopsy results and additional questioning of the patient, it was discovered that 2 days prior to her initial presentation she had juiced numerous limes by hand and subsequently spent a long period of time outside with sunlight exposure. Upon discovery of this additional historical information, the diagnosis of phytophotodermatitis was made.

Phytophotodermatitis is an erythematous inflammatory reaction that occurs on the skin after exposure to a plant-derived photosensitizer followed by UVA light radiation.¹⁴ This phenomenon was first described by the ancient Egyptians as a treatment for vitiligo.¹ The most common plant families that can cause this nonimmune cutaneous reaction include Apiaceae eg, hogweed, celery, dill, fennel) and Rutaceae (eg, citrus plants, rue).¹⁴ The psoralens or furocoumarins found in these plants bind loosely to DNA at their ground state but covalently bond to pyrimidine bases during photoexcitation with UVA, resulting in DNA damage and subsequent local inflammation.¹⁴ Given the patient’s clinical examination, pathology findings, and history, phytophotodermatitis secondary to lime juice exposure was confirmed. Two weeks after applying clobetasol ointment twice daily, the patient’s hands had returned to baseline with complete resolution of the erythematous lesions.

Although lime phytophotodermatitis is a routine diagnosis, this clinical case stands as an important reminder to demonstrate how common diseases can masquerade as more exotic cutaneous disorders. There often is a clinical desire to seek out more complicated diagnoses, particularly during residency training; however, this case reinforces the invaluable importance of collecting a thorough patient history, as it can ultimately minimize excessive testing and in some cases prevent unnecessary therapy.

The Diagnosis: Phytophotodermatitis

Initially, there was concern for autoimmune or connective tissue disease because of the edematous plaques localized over sun-exposed regions of the hands with marked sparing of the knuckles. Lupus erythematosus (LE), mixed connective tissue disease, CREST (calcinosis, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal motility disorders, sclerodactyly, telangiectasia) syndrome, dermatomyositis (DM), and erythromelalgia all were considered. Common disorders such as contact dermatitis and phytophotodermatitis remained in the differential diagnosis, though the patient adamantly denied any recent exposures. As part of the initial workup, laboratory studies including a complete blood cell count, comprehensive metabolic panel, serum lactate dehydrogenase, serum creatinine kinase, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and an antinuclear antibody panel were performed. Additionally, a punch biopsy at the border of the lesion was performed.

Lupus erythematosus was considered given the patient’s age and sex and the photoexposed location of the plaques. The photosensitive rash of LE classically affects the dorsal aspects of the hands while sparing the interphalangeal joints.^1,2 However, the patient had no nail fold findings consistent with systemic LE with no evidence of erythema or dilated tortuous vessels.³ Furthermore, there were no other cutaneous symptoms, and there was a negative review of systems, including malar/discoid rash, oral ulcers, photosensitivity, history of hematologic abnormalities, and end organ damage.^4,5 A negative antinuclear antibody serologic panel combined with a negative review of systems made the diagnosis of LE less likely.

Given the presenting clinical appearance, DM also was considered. Dermatomyositis traditionally displays ragged cuticular dystrophy with nail fold telangiectasia, mechanic hands, and involvement of the dorsal aspects of the hands with violaceous accentuation of the knuckles.⁶ The patient reported pruritus, which is common among DM patients; however, the nail folds were unaffected.⁷ Finally, she demonstrated sparing rather than involvement of the knuckles, which would be an unlikely presentation for DM.⁶

CREST syndrome, systemic sclerosis, and syndromes with overlapping features such as mixed connective tissue disease also were considered. The cutaneous features of CREST syndrome are characterized by initial edema of the digits with a subsequent taut and shiny indurated phase. Flexion contractures, ulceration, tapering of the digits, and loss of cutaneous fat pads can progressively occur.^8,9 Raynaud phenomenon is a common early finding in CREST syndrome or systemic sclerosis, and patients may develop ice pick digital infarcts and calcinosis in progressed disease.⁸ Common nail fold findings include periungual telangiectasia with dropout areas.^10,11 The marked edema and white discoloration of the knuckles in this patient could be mistaken for Raynaud phenomenon; however, she lacked pain or cold sensitivity and her discoloration was static.¹² Without sclerodermoid changes, nail fold findings, matted telangiectasia, taut skin, or systemic findings, a diagnosis of CREST syndrome, scleroderma, or other mixed connective tissue disease would be unlikely.⁸

Erythromelalgia is a clinical syndrome characterized by burning pain, erythema, and increased skin temperature that intermittently affects both the arms and legs. This rare disorder can be further classified into type 1 (associated with thrombocytopenia), type 2 (primary or idiopathic), and type 3 (associated with other medical cause excluding thrombocytopenia).^1,13 The patient endorsed some discomfort from the lesions but denied any subjective feeling of burning pain or increased skin temperature. Additionally, she had no family history of inheritable skin disorders and no personal history of polycythemia. Consequently, erythromelalgia remained less likely on the differential diagnosis.

The histology of the acral skin revealed mild focal spongiosis with no increase in dermal mucin on colloidal iron or mucopolysaccharide stains (Figure). After receiving the biopsy results and additional questioning of the patient, it was discovered that 2 days prior to her initial presentation she had juiced numerous limes by hand and subsequently spent a long period of time outside with sunlight exposure. Upon discovery of this additional historical information, the diagnosis of phytophotodermatitis was made.

Phytophotodermatitis is an erythematous inflammatory reaction that occurs on the skin after exposure to a plant-derived photosensitizer followed by UVA light radiation.¹⁴ This phenomenon was first described by the ancient Egyptians as a treatment for vitiligo.¹ The most common plant families that can cause this nonimmune cutaneous reaction include Apiaceae eg, hogweed, celery, dill, fennel) and Rutaceae (eg, citrus plants, rue).¹⁴ The psoralens or furocoumarins found in these plants bind loosely to DNA at their ground state but covalently bond to pyrimidine bases during photoexcitation with UVA, resulting in DNA damage and subsequent local inflammation.¹⁴ Given the patient’s clinical examination, pathology findings, and history, phytophotodermatitis secondary to lime juice exposure was confirmed. Two weeks after applying clobetasol ointment twice daily, the patient’s hands had returned to baseline with complete resolution of the erythematous lesions.

Although lime phytophotodermatitis is a routine diagnosis, this clinical case stands as an important reminder to demonstrate how common diseases can masquerade as more exotic cutaneous disorders. There often is a clinical desire to seek out more complicated diagnoses, particularly during residency training; however, this case reinforces the invaluable importance of collecting a thorough patient history, as it can ultimately minimize excessive testing and in some cases prevent unnecessary therapy.

The Diagnosis: Phytophotodermatitis

Initially, there was concern for autoimmune or connective tissue disease because of the edematous plaques localized over sun-exposed regions of the hands with marked sparing of the knuckles. Lupus erythematosus (LE), mixed connective tissue disease, CREST (calcinosis, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal motility disorders, sclerodactyly, telangiectasia) syndrome, dermatomyositis (DM), and erythromelalgia all were considered. Common disorders such as contact dermatitis and phytophotodermatitis remained in the differential diagnosis, though the patient adamantly denied any recent exposures. As part of the initial workup, laboratory studies including a complete blood cell count, comprehensive metabolic panel, serum lactate dehydrogenase, serum creatinine kinase, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and an antinuclear antibody panel were performed. Additionally, a punch biopsy at the border of the lesion was performed.

Lupus erythematosus was considered given the patient’s age and sex and the photoexposed location of the plaques. The photosensitive rash of LE classically affects the dorsal aspects of the hands while sparing the interphalangeal joints.^1,2 However, the patient had no nail fold findings consistent with systemic LE with no evidence of erythema or dilated tortuous vessels.³ Furthermore, there were no other cutaneous symptoms, and there was a negative review of systems, including malar/discoid rash, oral ulcers, photosensitivity, history of hematologic abnormalities, and end organ damage.^4,5 A negative antinuclear antibody serologic panel combined with a negative review of systems made the diagnosis of LE less likely.

Given the presenting clinical appearance, DM also was considered. Dermatomyositis traditionally displays ragged cuticular dystrophy with nail fold telangiectasia, mechanic hands, and involvement of the dorsal aspects of the hands with violaceous accentuation of the knuckles.⁶ The patient reported pruritus, which is common among DM patients; however, the nail folds were unaffected.⁷ Finally, she demonstrated sparing rather than involvement of the knuckles, which would be an unlikely presentation for DM.⁶

CREST syndrome, systemic sclerosis, and syndromes with overlapping features such as mixed connective tissue disease also were considered. The cutaneous features of CREST syndrome are characterized by initial edema of the digits with a subsequent taut and shiny indurated phase. Flexion contractures, ulceration, tapering of the digits, and loss of cutaneous fat pads can progressively occur.^8,9 Raynaud phenomenon is a common early finding in CREST syndrome or systemic sclerosis, and patients may develop ice pick digital infarcts and calcinosis in progressed disease.⁸ Common nail fold findings include periungual telangiectasia with dropout areas.^10,11 The marked edema and white discoloration of the knuckles in this patient could be mistaken for Raynaud phenomenon; however, she lacked pain or cold sensitivity and her discoloration was static.¹² Without sclerodermoid changes, nail fold findings, matted telangiectasia, taut skin, or systemic findings, a diagnosis of CREST syndrome, scleroderma, or other mixed connective tissue disease would be unlikely.⁸

Erythromelalgia is a clinical syndrome characterized by burning pain, erythema, and increased skin temperature that intermittently affects both the arms and legs. This rare disorder can be further classified into type 1 (associated with thrombocytopenia), type 2 (primary or idiopathic), and type 3 (associated with other medical cause excluding thrombocytopenia).^1,13 The patient endorsed some discomfort from the lesions but denied any subjective feeling of burning pain or increased skin temperature. Additionally, she had no family history of inheritable skin disorders and no personal history of polycythemia. Consequently, erythromelalgia remained less likely on the differential diagnosis.

The histology of the acral skin revealed mild focal spongiosis with no increase in dermal mucin on colloidal iron or mucopolysaccharide stains (Figure). After receiving the biopsy results and additional questioning of the patient, it was discovered that 2 days prior to her initial presentation she had juiced numerous limes by hand and subsequently spent a long period of time outside with sunlight exposure. Upon discovery of this additional historical information, the diagnosis of phytophotodermatitis was made.

Phytophotodermatitis is an erythematous inflammatory reaction that occurs on the skin after exposure to a plant-derived photosensitizer followed by UVA light radiation.¹⁴ This phenomenon was first described by the ancient Egyptians as a treatment for vitiligo.¹ The most common plant families that can cause this nonimmune cutaneous reaction include Apiaceae eg, hogweed, celery, dill, fennel) and Rutaceae (eg, citrus plants, rue).¹⁴ The psoralens or furocoumarins found in these plants bind loosely to DNA at their ground state but covalently bond to pyrimidine bases during photoexcitation with UVA, resulting in DNA damage and subsequent local inflammation.¹⁴ Given the patient’s clinical examination, pathology findings, and history, phytophotodermatitis secondary to lime juice exposure was confirmed. Two weeks after applying clobetasol ointment twice daily, the patient’s hands had returned to baseline with complete resolution of the erythematous lesions.

Although lime phytophotodermatitis is a routine diagnosis, this clinical case stands as an important reminder to demonstrate how common diseases can masquerade as more exotic cutaneous disorders. There often is a clinical desire to seek out more complicated diagnoses, particularly during residency training; however, this case reinforces the invaluable importance of collecting a thorough patient history, as it can ultimately minimize excessive testing and in some cases prevent unnecessary therapy.

The Diagnosis: Verrucous Carcinoma

An excisional biopsy revealed an endophytic and exophytic squamous proliferation with a papillomatous growth pattern, bulbous pushing border, and confluent parakeratosis (Figure). No fungal organisms were seen. Due to clinical and histological findings, a diagnosis of verrucous carcinoma (VC) was made.

Verrucous carcinoma is a rare variant of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with specific clinical and histological features.¹ These tumors have a slow and localized growth pattern but can be locally aggressive. Metastasis of VC is rare, giving VC an overall good prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate greater than 75%.² Verrucous carcinoma typically occurs in 1 of 3 locations: the oropharynx, genitals, or soles of the feet. Depending on the site of involvement, various names have been used in the literature to describe this entity, including Ackerman tumor (solitary oral mucosal lesion), Buschke-Lowenstein tumor (genital involvement), florid oral papillomatosis (multiple oral lesions), and carcinoma cuniculatum (sole of the foot).³ The most common sites for VC in the oral cavity are the buccal mucosa and gingiva.⁴

Verrucous carcinoma occurs more often among men in the sixth decade of life.³ The etiology of oral VC remains unclear; however, use of chewing tobacco, chemical carcinogens, chronic irritation, human papillomavirus (HPV), and poor oral hygiene have been reported as predisposing risk factors.^4,5 The role of HPV in the pathogenesis of VC remains controversial, but both low-risk types HPV-6 and HPV-11 and high-risk types HPV-16 and HPV-18 have been found in association with VC.^5,6

Clinically, oral VC lesions most often present as pink-white erythematous papules or plaques with exophytic cauliflowerlike surface alterations. Although the tumors are slow growing with little risk for metastasis, they may be locally invasive with deep involvement of the surrounding
structures.¹ Histopathologically, VC displays proliferation of the epithelium with downward growth into the connective tissue but usually without a pattern of true invasion. The epithelium is well differentiated and displays little pleomorphism or mitoses.^5,7 Obtaining a generous biopsy specimen is essential to view the diagnostic architecture of VC and rule out other entities, such as viral verruca, blastomycosis, SCC, and verruciform xanthoma. Squamous cell carcinoma characteristically has a more infiltrative border as opposed to the bulbous border of VC. In addition, the distribution of p53 and Ki-67 staining differs between SCC and VC. Squamous cell carcinoma shows positive p53 and Ki-67 staining for the full thickness of the epidermis, while VC has positive staining only in the lower third of the epidermis.⁵

Surgical resection is considered the first-line treatment of VC through excision or Mohs micrographic surgery. Radiation therapy is controversial due to the risk for anaplastic transformation. When surgery is not ideal due to the tumor size or location or the patient’s preference, other treatment modalities with reported success include intralesional interferon alfa; cryosurgery; topical imiquimod; and topical or systemic cytostatic agents such as bleomycin, 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, or methotrexate.^1,2

The Diagnosis: Verrucous Carcinoma

An excisional biopsy revealed an endophytic and exophytic squamous proliferation with a papillomatous growth pattern, bulbous pushing border, and confluent parakeratosis (Figure). No fungal organisms were seen. Due to clinical and histological findings, a diagnosis of verrucous carcinoma (VC) was made.

Verrucous carcinoma is a rare variant of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with specific clinical and histological features.¹ These tumors have a slow and localized growth pattern but can be locally aggressive. Metastasis of VC is rare, giving VC an overall good prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate greater than 75%.² Verrucous carcinoma typically occurs in 1 of 3 locations: the oropharynx, genitals, or soles of the feet. Depending on the site of involvement, various names have been used in the literature to describe this entity, including Ackerman tumor (solitary oral mucosal lesion), Buschke-Lowenstein tumor (genital involvement), florid oral papillomatosis (multiple oral lesions), and carcinoma cuniculatum (sole of the foot).³ The most common sites for VC in the oral cavity are the buccal mucosa and gingiva.⁴

Verrucous carcinoma occurs more often among men in the sixth decade of life.³ The etiology of oral VC remains unclear; however, use of chewing tobacco, chemical carcinogens, chronic irritation, human papillomavirus (HPV), and poor oral hygiene have been reported as predisposing risk factors.^4,5 The role of HPV in the pathogenesis of VC remains controversial, but both low-risk types HPV-6 and HPV-11 and high-risk types HPV-16 and HPV-18 have been found in association with VC.^5,6

Clinically, oral VC lesions most often present as pink-white erythematous papules or plaques with exophytic cauliflowerlike surface alterations. Although the tumors are slow growing with little risk for metastasis, they may be locally invasive with deep involvement of the surrounding
structures.¹ Histopathologically, VC displays proliferation of the epithelium with downward growth into the connective tissue but usually without a pattern of true invasion. The epithelium is well differentiated and displays little pleomorphism or mitoses.^5,7 Obtaining a generous biopsy specimen is essential to view the diagnostic architecture of VC and rule out other entities, such as viral verruca, blastomycosis, SCC, and verruciform xanthoma. Squamous cell carcinoma characteristically has a more infiltrative border as opposed to the bulbous border of VC. In addition, the distribution of p53 and Ki-67 staining differs between SCC and VC. Squamous cell carcinoma shows positive p53 and Ki-67 staining for the full thickness of the epidermis, while VC has positive staining only in the lower third of the epidermis.⁵

Surgical resection is considered the first-line treatment of VC through excision or Mohs micrographic surgery. Radiation therapy is controversial due to the risk for anaplastic transformation. When surgery is not ideal due to the tumor size or location or the patient’s preference, other treatment modalities with reported success include intralesional interferon alfa; cryosurgery; topical imiquimod; and topical or systemic cytostatic agents such as bleomycin, 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, or methotrexate.^1,2

The Diagnosis: Verrucous Carcinoma

An excisional biopsy revealed an endophytic and exophytic squamous proliferation with a papillomatous growth pattern, bulbous pushing border, and confluent parakeratosis (Figure). No fungal organisms were seen. Due to clinical and histological findings, a diagnosis of verrucous carcinoma (VC) was made.

Verrucous carcinoma is a rare variant of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with specific clinical and histological features.¹ These tumors have a slow and localized growth pattern but can be locally aggressive. Metastasis of VC is rare, giving VC an overall good prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate greater than 75%.² Verrucous carcinoma typically occurs in 1 of 3 locations: the oropharynx, genitals, or soles of the feet. Depending on the site of involvement, various names have been used in the literature to describe this entity, including Ackerman tumor (solitary oral mucosal lesion), Buschke-Lowenstein tumor (genital involvement), florid oral papillomatosis (multiple oral lesions), and carcinoma cuniculatum (sole of the foot).³ The most common sites for VC in the oral cavity are the buccal mucosa and gingiva.⁴

Verrucous carcinoma occurs more often among men in the sixth decade of life.³ The etiology of oral VC remains unclear; however, use of chewing tobacco, chemical carcinogens, chronic irritation, human papillomavirus (HPV), and poor oral hygiene have been reported as predisposing risk factors.^4,5 The role of HPV in the pathogenesis of VC remains controversial, but both low-risk types HPV-6 and HPV-11 and high-risk types HPV-16 and HPV-18 have been found in association with VC.^5,6

Clinically, oral VC lesions most often present as pink-white erythematous papules or plaques with exophytic cauliflowerlike surface alterations. Although the tumors are slow growing with little risk for metastasis, they may be locally invasive with deep involvement of the surrounding
structures.¹ Histopathologically, VC displays proliferation of the epithelium with downward growth into the connective tissue but usually without a pattern of true invasion. The epithelium is well differentiated and displays little pleomorphism or mitoses.^5,7 Obtaining a generous biopsy specimen is essential to view the diagnostic architecture of VC and rule out other entities, such as viral verruca, blastomycosis, SCC, and verruciform xanthoma. Squamous cell carcinoma characteristically has a more infiltrative border as opposed to the bulbous border of VC. In addition, the distribution of p53 and Ki-67 staining differs between SCC and VC. Squamous cell carcinoma shows positive p53 and Ki-67 staining for the full thickness of the epidermis, while VC has positive staining only in the lower third of the epidermis.⁵

Surgical resection is considered the first-line treatment of VC through excision or Mohs micrographic surgery. Radiation therapy is controversial due to the risk for anaplastic transformation. When surgery is not ideal due to the tumor size or location or the patient’s preference, other treatment modalities with reported success include intralesional interferon alfa; cryosurgery; topical imiquimod; and topical or systemic cytostatic agents such as bleomycin, 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, or methotrexate.^1,2

The Diagnosis: Pigmented Bowen Disease

A biopsy of the lesion was performed for suspected acral malignant melanoma. Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed acanthosis, elongation of rete ridges, and keratinocytes in complete disorder with atypical mitoses and pleomorphism affecting the full layer of the epidermis (Figure 1). The basement membrane was intact. Melanin pigmentation was increased in the lower epidermis and the upper dermis, and a lymphohistiocytic inflammatory infiltrate was present in the dermis. Staining for carcinoembryonic antigen (Figure 2) and melanoma
antigen (Figure 3) recognized by T cells (melan-A) both revealed negative results. Histopathologic findings led to the diagnosis of pigmented Bowen disease (BD).

Pigmented BD is a rare variant that accounts for 1.7% (N=420) to 5.5% (N=951) of all cases of BD.^1,2 It is reported to affect men more than women and to be more prevalent in individuals with higher Fitzpatrick skin types.³ Furthermore, exposure to UV radiation, chemicals (eg, arsenic), or human papillomavirus, as well as immunosuppression, are known to be related to pigmented BD.^2,4 Clinically, pigmented BD commonly involves nonexposed areas such as the anogenital area, trunk, and extremities, unlike typical BD that involves sun-exposed areas.⁵ In addition, it most frequently presents as a well-delineated, irregularly pigmented, asymptomatic
plaque and not as a scaly erythematous plaque. Therefore, the clinical diagnosis may be challenging. The differential diagnosis includes malignant melanoma, pigmented extramammary Paget disease, pigmented basal cell carcinoma, seborrheic keratosis, pigmented actinic keratosis, solar lentigo, and melanocytic nevi.

Histopathologically, a varying amount of melanin deposit is noted on hematoxylin and eosin staining, along with features of BD, including disarrayed atypical keratinocytes involving the full epidermis but not the basement membrane, with atypical individual cell keratinization.^3,5,6 Pigmented extramammary Paget disease can mimic pigmented BD clinically and pathologically, but Paget cells stain positive for anticytokeratin (CAM 5.2), carcinoembryonic antigen, and mucicarmine, whereas cells in pigmented BD stain negative.⁷ Moreover, negative staining for human melanoma black, melan-A, and S-100 helps differentiate malignant melanoma from pigmented BD.⁸

The prognosis of pigmented BD is similar to classic BD and is independent of the presence of melanin pigment.⁶ Therefore, the treatment options do not differ from those for typical BD and include surgical excision, cryotherapy, laser ablation, topical imiquimod or 5-fluorouracil, curettage, electrosurgery, and photodynamic therapy (PDT).

In our case, the patient and her family did not want surgical removal; therefore, 1 course of fractional laser-assisted PDT and 2 courses of ablative laser-assisted PDT were performed. Unfortunately, the lesion persisted, possibly because it was too large and pigmented. Two months later, ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% was applied (4 courses) after using an ablative laser over 3 consecutive days with a 1-month interval between courses. The lesion resolved without any adverse events.

The Diagnosis: Pigmented Bowen Disease

A biopsy of the lesion was performed for suspected acral malignant melanoma. Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed acanthosis, elongation of rete ridges, and keratinocytes in complete disorder with atypical mitoses and pleomorphism affecting the full layer of the epidermis (Figure 1). The basement membrane was intact. Melanin pigmentation was increased in the lower epidermis and the upper dermis, and a lymphohistiocytic inflammatory infiltrate was present in the dermis. Staining for carcinoembryonic antigen (Figure 2) and melanoma
antigen (Figure 3) recognized by T cells (melan-A) both revealed negative results. Histopathologic findings led to the diagnosis of pigmented Bowen disease (BD).

Pigmented BD is a rare variant that accounts for 1.7% (N=420) to 5.5% (N=951) of all cases of BD.^1,2 It is reported to affect men more than women and to be more prevalent in individuals with higher Fitzpatrick skin types.³ Furthermore, exposure to UV radiation, chemicals (eg, arsenic), or human papillomavirus, as well as immunosuppression, are known to be related to pigmented BD.^2,4 Clinically, pigmented BD commonly involves nonexposed areas such as the anogenital area, trunk, and extremities, unlike typical BD that involves sun-exposed areas.⁵ In addition, it most frequently presents as a well-delineated, irregularly pigmented, asymptomatic
plaque and not as a scaly erythematous plaque. Therefore, the clinical diagnosis may be challenging. The differential diagnosis includes malignant melanoma, pigmented extramammary Paget disease, pigmented basal cell carcinoma, seborrheic keratosis, pigmented actinic keratosis, solar lentigo, and melanocytic nevi.

Histopathologically, a varying amount of melanin deposit is noted on hematoxylin and eosin staining, along with features of BD, including disarrayed atypical keratinocytes involving the full epidermis but not the basement membrane, with atypical individual cell keratinization.^3,5,6 Pigmented extramammary Paget disease can mimic pigmented BD clinically and pathologically, but Paget cells stain positive for anticytokeratin (CAM 5.2), carcinoembryonic antigen, and mucicarmine, whereas cells in pigmented BD stain negative.⁷ Moreover, negative staining for human melanoma black, melan-A, and S-100 helps differentiate malignant melanoma from pigmented BD.⁸

The prognosis of pigmented BD is similar to classic BD and is independent of the presence of melanin pigment.⁶ Therefore, the treatment options do not differ from those for typical BD and include surgical excision, cryotherapy, laser ablation, topical imiquimod or 5-fluorouracil, curettage, electrosurgery, and photodynamic therapy (PDT).

In our case, the patient and her family did not want surgical removal; therefore, 1 course of fractional laser-assisted PDT and 2 courses of ablative laser-assisted PDT were performed. Unfortunately, the lesion persisted, possibly because it was too large and pigmented. Two months later, ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% was applied (4 courses) after using an ablative laser over 3 consecutive days with a 1-month interval between courses. The lesion resolved without any adverse events.

The Diagnosis: Pigmented Bowen Disease

A biopsy of the lesion was performed for suspected acral malignant melanoma. Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed acanthosis, elongation of rete ridges, and keratinocytes in complete disorder with atypical mitoses and pleomorphism affecting the full layer of the epidermis (Figure 1). The basement membrane was intact. Melanin pigmentation was increased in the lower epidermis and the upper dermis, and a lymphohistiocytic inflammatory infiltrate was present in the dermis. Staining for carcinoembryonic antigen (Figure 2) and melanoma
antigen (Figure 3) recognized by T cells (melan-A) both revealed negative results. Histopathologic findings led to the diagnosis of pigmented Bowen disease (BD).

Pigmented BD is a rare variant that accounts for 1.7% (N=420) to 5.5% (N=951) of all cases of BD.^1,2 It is reported to affect men more than women and to be more prevalent in individuals with higher Fitzpatrick skin types.³ Furthermore, exposure to UV radiation, chemicals (eg, arsenic), or human papillomavirus, as well as immunosuppression, are known to be related to pigmented BD.^2,4 Clinically, pigmented BD commonly involves nonexposed areas such as the anogenital area, trunk, and extremities, unlike typical BD that involves sun-exposed areas.⁵ In addition, it most frequently presents as a well-delineated, irregularly pigmented, asymptomatic
plaque and not as a scaly erythematous plaque. Therefore, the clinical diagnosis may be challenging. The differential diagnosis includes malignant melanoma, pigmented extramammary Paget disease, pigmented basal cell carcinoma, seborrheic keratosis, pigmented actinic keratosis, solar lentigo, and melanocytic nevi.

Histopathologically, a varying amount of melanin deposit is noted on hematoxylin and eosin staining, along with features of BD, including disarrayed atypical keratinocytes involving the full epidermis but not the basement membrane, with atypical individual cell keratinization.^3,5,6 Pigmented extramammary Paget disease can mimic pigmented BD clinically and pathologically, but Paget cells stain positive for anticytokeratin (CAM 5.2), carcinoembryonic antigen, and mucicarmine, whereas cells in pigmented BD stain negative.⁷ Moreover, negative staining for human melanoma black, melan-A, and S-100 helps differentiate malignant melanoma from pigmented BD.⁸

The prognosis of pigmented BD is similar to classic BD and is independent of the presence of melanin pigment.⁶ Therefore, the treatment options do not differ from those for typical BD and include surgical excision, cryotherapy, laser ablation, topical imiquimod or 5-fluorouracil, curettage, electrosurgery, and photodynamic therapy (PDT).

In our case, the patient and her family did not want surgical removal; therefore, 1 course of fractional laser-assisted PDT and 2 courses of ablative laser-assisted PDT were performed. Unfortunately, the lesion persisted, possibly because it was too large and pigmented. Two months later, ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% was applied (4 courses) after using an ablative laser over 3 consecutive days with a 1-month interval between courses. The lesion resolved without any adverse events.