Allowed Publications
Slot System
Featured Buckets
Featured Buckets Admin

Tinted Sunscreens: Consumer Preferences Based on Light, Medium, and Dark Skin Tones

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 11/02/2022 - 13:47
Display Headline
Tinted Sunscreens: Consumer Preferences Based on Light, Medium, and Dark Skin Tones
In Collaboration With The Skin Of Color Society

Sunscreen formulations typically protect from UV radiation (290–400 nm), as this is a well-established cause of photodamage, photoaging, and skin cancer.1 However, sunlight also consists of visible (400–700 nm) and infrared (>700 nm) radiation.2 In fact, UV radiation only comprises 5% to 7% of the solar radiation that reaches the surface of the earth, while visible and infrared lights comprise 44% and 53%, respectively.3 Visible light (VL) is the only portion of the solar spectrum visible to the human eye; it penetrates the skin to a depth range of 90 to 750 µm compared to 1.5 to 90 µm for UV radiation.4 Visible light also may come from artificial sources such as light bulbs and digital screens. The rapidly increasing use of smartphones, tablets, laptops, and other digital screens that emit high levels of short-wavelength VL has increased concerns about the safety of these devices. Although blue light exposure from screens is small compared with the amount of exposure from the sun, there is concern about the long-term effects of excessive screen time. Recent studies have demonstrated that exposure to light emitted from electronic devices, even for as little as 1 hour, may cause reactive oxygen species generation, apoptosis, collagen degradation, and necrosis of skin cells.5 Visible light increases tyrosinase activity and induces immediate erythema in light-skinned individuals and long-lasting pigmentation in dark-skinned individuals.4,6

Sunscreens consist of chemical and mineral active ingredients that contain UV filters designed to absorb, scatter, and reflect UV photons with wavelengths up to 380 nm. Historically, traditional options do not protect against the effects induced by VL, as these sunscreens use nanosized particles that help to reduce the white appearance and result in transparency of the product.7 To block VL, the topical agent must be visible. Tinted sunscreens (TSs) are products that combine UV and VL filters. They give a colored base coverage that is achieved by incorporating a blend of black, red, and yellow iron oxides (IOs) and/or pigmentary titanium dioxide (PTD)(ie, titanium dioxide [TD] that is not nanosized). Because TSs offer an instant glow and protect the skin from both sun and artificial light, they have become increasingly popular and have been incorporated into makeup and skin care products to facilitate daily convenient use.

The purpose of this analysis was to study current available options and product factors that may influence consumer preference when choosing a TS based on the reviewer characteristics.

 

Methods

The keyword sunscreen was searched in the broader category of skin care products on an online supplier of sunscreens (www.sephora.com). This supplier was chosen because, unlike other sources, specific reviewer characteristics regarding underlying skin tone also were available. The search produced 161 results. For the purpose of this analysis, only facial TSs containing IO and/or PTD were included. Each sunscreen was checked by the authors, and 58 sunscreens that met the inclusion criteria were identified and further reviewed. Descriptive data, including formulation, sun protection factor (SPF), ingredient type (chemical or physical), pigments used, shades available, additional benefits, price range, rating, and user reviews, were gathered. The authors extracted these data from the product information on the website, manufacturer claims, ratings, and reviewer comments on each of the listed sunscreens.

For each product, the content of the top 10 most helpful positive and negative reviews as voted by consumers (1160 total reviews, consisting of 1 or more comments) was analyzed. Two authors (H.D.L.G. and P.V.) coded consumer-reported comments for positive and negative descriptors into the categories of cosmetic elegance, performance, skin compatibility and tolerance, tone compatibility, and affordability. Cosmetic elegance was defined as any feature associated with skin sensation (eg, greasy), color (eg, white cast), scent, ability to blend, and overall appearance of the product on the skin. Product performance included SPF, effectiveness in preventing sunburn, coverage, and finish claims (ie, matte, glow, invisible). Skin compatibility and tolerance were represented in the reviewers’ comments and reflected how the product performed in association with underlying dermatologic conditions, skin type, and if there were any side effects such as irritation or allergic reactions. Tone compatibility referred to TS color similarity with users’ skin and shades available for individual products. Affordability reflected consumers’ perceptions of the product price. Comments may be included in multiple categories (eg, a product was noted to blend well on the skin but did not provide enough coverage). Of entries, 10% (116/1160 reviews) were coded by first author (H.D.L.G.) to ensure internal validity. Reviewer characteristics were consistently available and were used to determine the top 5 recommended products for light-, medium-, and dark-skinned individuals based on the number of 5-star ratings in each group. Porcelain, fair, and light were considered light skin tones. Medium, tan, and olive were considered medium skin tones. Deep, dark, and ebony were considered dark skin tones.

Results

Sunscreen Characteristics—Among the 161 screened products, 58 met the inclusion criteria. Four types of formulations were included: lotion, cream, liquid, and powder. Twenty-nine (50%) were creams, followed by lotions (19%), liquids (28%), and powders (3%). More than 79% (46/58) of products had a reported SPF of 30 or higher. Sunscreens with an active physical ingredient—the minerals TD and/or zinc oxide (ZO)—were most common (33/58 [57%]), followed by the chemical sunscreens avobenzone, octinoxate, oxybenzone, homosalate, octisalate, and/or octocrylene active ingredients (14/58 [24%]), and a combination of chemical and physical sunscreens (11/58 [19%]). Nearly all products (55/58 [95%]) contained pigmentary IO (red, CI 77491; yellow, CI 77492; black, CI 77499). Notably, only 38% (22/58) of products had more than 1 shade. All products had additional claims associated with being hydrating, having antiaging effects, smoothing texture, minimizing the appearance of pores, softening lines, and/or promoting even skin tone. Traditional physical sunscreens (those containing TD and/or ZO) were more expensive than chemical sunscreens, with a median price of $30. The median review rating was 4.5 of 5 stars, with a median of 2300 customer reviews per product. Findings are summarized in Table 1.

Tinted Sunscreen Characteristics and Descriptors of the Top 10 Most Helpful Positive and Negative Comments as Voted by Consumers

Positive Features of Sunscreens—Based on an analysis of total reviews (N=1160), cosmetic elegance was the most cited positive feature associated with TS products (31%), followed by product performance (10%). Skin compatibility and tolerance (7%), tone compatibility (7%), and affordability (7%) were cited less commonly as positive features. When negative features were cited, consumers mostly noted tone incompatibility (16%) and cosmetic elegance concerns (14%). Product performance (13%) was comparatively cited as a negative feature (Table 1). Exemplary positive comments categorized in cosmetic elegance included the subthemes of rubs in well and natural glow. Exemplary negative comments in cosmetic elegance and tone compatibility categories included the subthemes patchy/dry finish and color mismatch. Table 1 illustrates these findings.

 

 

Product Recommendations—The top 5 recommendations of the best TS for each skin tone are listed in Table 2. The mean price of the recommended products was $42 for 1 to 1.9 oz. Laura Mercier Tinted Moisturizer Oil Free Natural Skin Perfector broad spectrum SPF 20 (Laura Mercier) was the top product for all 3 groups. Similarly, of 58 products available, the same 5 products—Laura Mercier Tinted Moisturizer Oil Free Natural Skin Perfector broad spectrum SPF 20, IT Cosmetics CC+ Cream with SPF 50 (IT Cosmetics, LLC), Tarte Amazonian Clay BB Tinted Moisturizer Broad Spectrum SPF 20 (Tarte Cosmetics), NARS Pure Radiant Tinted Moisturizer Broad Spectrum SPF 30 (NARS Cosmetics), and Laura Mercier Tinted Moisturizer Natural Skin Perfector broad spectrum SPF 30—were considered the best among consumers of all skin tones, with the addition of 2 different products (bareMinerals Original Liquid Mineral Foundation Broad Spectrum SPF 20 [bareMinerals] and ILIA Super Serum Skin Tint SPF 40 Foundation [ILIA Beauty]) in the dark skin group. Notably, these products were the only ones on Sephora’s website that offered up to 30 (22 on average) different shades.

Top 5 Products as Rated by Reviewers With Light, Medium, and Dark Skin Tones

Comment

Tone Compatibility—Tinted sunscreens were created to extend the range of photoprotection into the VL spectrum. The goal of TSs is to incorporate pigments that blend in with the natural skin tone, produce a glow, and have an aesthetically pleasing appearance. To accommodate a variety of skin colors, different shades can be obtained by mixing different amounts of yellow, red, and black IO with or without PTD. The pigments and reflective compounds provide color, opacity, and a natural coverage. Our qualitative analysis provides information on the lack of diversity among shades available for TS, especially for darker skin tones. Of the 58 products evaluated, 62% (32/58) only had 1 shade. In our cohort, tone compatibility was the most commonly cited negative feature. Of note, 89% of these comments were from consumers with dark skin tones, and there was a disproportional number of reviews by darker-skinned individuals compared to users with light and medium skin tones. This is of particular importance, as TSs have been shown to protect against dermatoses that disproportionally affect individuals with skin of color. When comparing sunscreen formulations containing IO with regular mineral sunscreens, Dumbuya et al3 found that IO-containing formulations significantly protected against VL-induced pigmentation compared with untreated skin or mineral sunscreen with SPF 50 or higher in individuals with Fitzpatrick skin type IV (P<.001). Similarly, Bernstein et al8 found that exposing patients with Fitzpatrick skin types III and IV to blue-violet light resulted in marked hyperpigmentation that lasted up to 3 months. Visible light elicits immediate and persistent pigment darkening in individuals with Fitzpatrick skin phototype III and above via the photo-oxidation of pre-existing melanin and de novo melanogenesis.9 Tinted sunscreens formulated with IO have been shown to aid in the treatment of melasma and prevent hyperpigmentation in individuals with Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI.10 Patients with darker skin tones with dermatoses aggravated or induced by VL, such as melasma and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, may seek photoprotection provided by TS but find the lack of matching shades unappealing. The dearth of shade diversity that matches all skin tones can lead to inequities and disproportionally affect those with darker skin.

Performance—Tinted sunscreen formulations containing IO have been proven effective in protecting against high-energy VL, especially when combined synergistically with ZO.11 Kaye et al12 found that TSs containing IO and the inorganic filters TD or ZO reduced transmittance of VL more effectively than nontinted sunscreens containing TD or ZO alone or products containing organic filters. The decreased VL transmittance in the former is due to synergistic effects of the VL-scattering properties of the TD and the VL absorption properties of the IO. Similarly, Sayre et al13 demonstrated that IO was superior to TD and ZO in attenuating the transmission of VL. Bernstein et al14 found that darker shades containing higher percentages of IO increased the attenuation of VL to 98% compared with lighter shades attenuating 93%. This correlates with the results of prior studies highlighting the potential of TSs in protecting individuals with skin of color.3 In our cohort, comments regarding product performance and protection were mostly positive, claiming that consistent use reduced hyperpigmentation on the skin surface, giving the appearance of a more even skin tone.

Tolerability—Iron oxides are minerals known to be safe, gentle, and nontoxic on the surface of the skin.15 Two case reports of contact dermatitis due to IO have been reported.16,17 Within our cohort, only a few of the comments (6%) described negative product tolerance or compatibility with their skin type. However, it is more likely that these incompatibilities were due to other ingredients in the product or the individuals’ underlying dermatologic conditions.

Cosmetic Elegance—Most of the sunscreens available on the market today contain micronized forms of TD and ZO particles because they have better cosmetic acceptability.18 However, their reduced size compromises the protection provided against VL whereby the addition of IO is of vital importance. According to the RealSelf Sun Safety Report, only 11% of Americans wear sunscreen daily, and 46% never wear sunscreen.19 The most common reasons consumers reported for not wearing sunscreen included not liking how it looks on the skin, forgetting to apply it, and/or believing that application is inconvenient and time-consuming. Currently, TSs have been incorporated into daily-life products such as makeup, moisturizers, and serums, making application for users easy and convenient, decreasing the necessity of using multiple products, and offering the opportunity to choose from different presentations to make decisions for convenience and/or diverse occasions. Products containing IO blend in with the natural skin tone and have an aesthetically pleasing cosmetic appearance. In our cohort, comments regarding cosmetic elegance were highly valued and were present in multiple reviews (45%), with 69% being positive.

Affordability—In our cohort, product price was not predominantly mentioned in consumers’ reviews. However, negative comments regarding affordability were slightly higher than the positive (56% vs 44%). Notably, the mean price of our top recommendations was $42. Higher price was associated with products with a wider range of shades available. Prior studies have found similar results demonstrating that websites with recommendations on sunscreens for patients with skin of color compared with sunscreens for white or fair skin were more likely to recommend more expensive products (median, $14/oz vs $11.3/oz) despite the lower SPF level.20 According to Schneider,21 daily use of the cheapest sunscreen on the head/neck region recommended for white/pale skin ($2/oz) would lead to an annual cost of $61 compared to $182 for darker skin ($6/oz). This showcases the considerable variation in sunscreen prices for both populations that could potentiate disparities and vulnerability in the latter group.

Conclusion

Tinted sunscreens provide both functional and cosmetic benefits and are a safe, effective, and convenient way to protect against high-energy VL. This study suggests that patients with skin of color encounter difficulties in finding matching shades in TS products. These difficulties may stem from the lack of knowledge regarding dark complexions and undertones and the lack of representation of black and brown skin that has persisted in dermatology research journals and textbooks for decades.22 Our study provides important insights to help dermatologists improve their familiarity with the brands and characteristics of TSs geared to patients with all skin tones, including skin of color. Limitations include single-retailer information and inclusion of both highly and poorly rated comments with subjective data, limiting generalizability. The limited selection of shades for darker skin poses a roadblock to proper treatment and prevention. These data represent an area for improvement within the beauty industry and the dermatologic field to deliver culturally sensitive care by being knowledgeable about darker skin tones and TS formulations tailored to people with skin of color.

References
  1. McDaniel D, Farris P, Valacchi G. Atmospheric skin aging-contributors and inhibitors. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;17:124-137.
  2. Duteil L, Cardot-Leccia N, Queille-Roussel C, et al. Differences in visible light-induced pigmentation according to wavelengths: a clinical and histological study in comparison with UVB exposure. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014;27:822-826.
  3. Dumbuya H, Grimes PE, Lynch S, et al. Impact of iron-oxide containing formulations against visible light-induced skin pigmentation in skin of color individuals. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19:712-717.
  4. Lyons AB, Trullas C, Kohli I, et al. Photoprotection beyond ultraviolet radiation: a review of tinted sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:1393-1397.
  5. Austin E, Huang A, Adar T, et al. Electronic device generated light increases reactive oxygen species in human fibroblasts [published online February 5, 2018]. Lasers Surg Med. doi:10.1002/lsm.22794
  6. Randhawa M, Seo I, Liebel F, et al. Visible light induces melanogenesis in human skin through a photoadaptive response. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130949.
  7. Yeager DG, Lim HW. What’s new in photoprotection: a review of new concepts and controversies. Dermatol Clin. 2019;37:149-157.
  8. Bernstein EF, Sarkas HW, Boland P. Iron oxides in novel skin care formulations attenuate blue light for enhanced protection against skin damage. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20:532-537.
  9. Duteil L, Cardot-Leccia N, Queille-Roussel C, et al. Differences in visible light-induced pigmentation according to wavelengths: a clinical and histological study in comparison with UVB exposure. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014;27:822-826.
  10. Ruvolo E, Fair M, Hutson A, et al. Photoprotection against visible light-induced pigmentation. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2018;40:589-595.
  11. Cohen L, Brodsky MA, Zubair R, et al. Cutaneous interaction with visible light: what do we know. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;S0190-9622(20)30551-X.
  12. Kaye ET, Levin JA, Blank IH, et al. Efficiency of opaque photoprotective agents in the visible light range. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127:351-355.
  13. Sayre RM, Kollias N, Roberts RL, et al. Physical sunscreens. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1990;41:103-109.
  14. Bernstein EF, Sarkas HW, Boland P, et al. Beyond sun protection factor: an approach to environmental protection with novel mineral coatings in a vehicle containing a blend of skincare ingredients. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19:407-415.
  15. MacLeman E. Why are iron oxides used? Deep Science website. February 10, 2022. Accessed March 22, 2022. https://thedermreview.com/iron-oxides-ci-77491-ci-77492-ci-77499/
  16. Zugerman C. Contact dermatitis to yellow iron oxide. Contact Dermatitis. 1985;13:107-109.
  17. Saxena M, Warshaw E, Ahmed DD. Eyelid allergic contact dermatitis to black iron oxide. Am J Contact Dermat. 2001;12:38-39.
  18. Smijs TG, Pavel S. Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreens: focus on their safety and effectiveness. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2011;4:95-112.
  19. 2020 RealSelf Sun Safety Report: majority of Americans don’t use sunscreen daily. Practical Dermatology. May 6, 2020. Accessed March 22, 2022. https://practicaldermatology.com/news/realself-sun-safety-report-majority-of-americans-dont-use-sunscreen-daily
  20. Song H, Beckles A, Salian P, et al. Sunscreen recommendations for patients with skin of color in the popular press and in the dermatology clinic. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2020;7:165-170.
  21. Schneider J. The teaspoon rule of applying sunscreen. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:838-839.
  22. Nelson B. How dermatology is failing melanoma patients with skin of color: unanswered questions on risk and eye-opening disparities in outcomes are weighing heavily on melanoma patients with darker skin. in this article, part 1 of a 2-part series, we explore the deadly consequences of racism and inequality in cancer care. Cancer Cytopathol. 2020;128:7-8.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. De La Garza, Visutjindaporn, and Vashi are from the Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Massachusetts. Dr. Maymone is from the Department of Dermatology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. Dr. Vashi also is from the VA Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Neelam A. Vashi, MD, Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, 609 Albany St J502, Boston, MA 02118 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 109(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
198-203
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. De La Garza, Visutjindaporn, and Vashi are from the Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Massachusetts. Dr. Maymone is from the Department of Dermatology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. Dr. Vashi also is from the VA Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Neelam A. Vashi, MD, Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, 609 Albany St J502, Boston, MA 02118 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. De La Garza, Visutjindaporn, and Vashi are from the Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Massachusetts. Dr. Maymone is from the Department of Dermatology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. Dr. Vashi also is from the VA Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Neelam A. Vashi, MD, Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, 609 Albany St J502, Boston, MA 02118 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
In Collaboration With The Skin Of Color Society
In Collaboration With The Skin Of Color Society

Sunscreen formulations typically protect from UV radiation (290–400 nm), as this is a well-established cause of photodamage, photoaging, and skin cancer.1 However, sunlight also consists of visible (400–700 nm) and infrared (>700 nm) radiation.2 In fact, UV radiation only comprises 5% to 7% of the solar radiation that reaches the surface of the earth, while visible and infrared lights comprise 44% and 53%, respectively.3 Visible light (VL) is the only portion of the solar spectrum visible to the human eye; it penetrates the skin to a depth range of 90 to 750 µm compared to 1.5 to 90 µm for UV radiation.4 Visible light also may come from artificial sources such as light bulbs and digital screens. The rapidly increasing use of smartphones, tablets, laptops, and other digital screens that emit high levels of short-wavelength VL has increased concerns about the safety of these devices. Although blue light exposure from screens is small compared with the amount of exposure from the sun, there is concern about the long-term effects of excessive screen time. Recent studies have demonstrated that exposure to light emitted from electronic devices, even for as little as 1 hour, may cause reactive oxygen species generation, apoptosis, collagen degradation, and necrosis of skin cells.5 Visible light increases tyrosinase activity and induces immediate erythema in light-skinned individuals and long-lasting pigmentation in dark-skinned individuals.4,6

Sunscreens consist of chemical and mineral active ingredients that contain UV filters designed to absorb, scatter, and reflect UV photons with wavelengths up to 380 nm. Historically, traditional options do not protect against the effects induced by VL, as these sunscreens use nanosized particles that help to reduce the white appearance and result in transparency of the product.7 To block VL, the topical agent must be visible. Tinted sunscreens (TSs) are products that combine UV and VL filters. They give a colored base coverage that is achieved by incorporating a blend of black, red, and yellow iron oxides (IOs) and/or pigmentary titanium dioxide (PTD)(ie, titanium dioxide [TD] that is not nanosized). Because TSs offer an instant glow and protect the skin from both sun and artificial light, they have become increasingly popular and have been incorporated into makeup and skin care products to facilitate daily convenient use.

The purpose of this analysis was to study current available options and product factors that may influence consumer preference when choosing a TS based on the reviewer characteristics.

 

Methods

The keyword sunscreen was searched in the broader category of skin care products on an online supplier of sunscreens (www.sephora.com). This supplier was chosen because, unlike other sources, specific reviewer characteristics regarding underlying skin tone also were available. The search produced 161 results. For the purpose of this analysis, only facial TSs containing IO and/or PTD were included. Each sunscreen was checked by the authors, and 58 sunscreens that met the inclusion criteria were identified and further reviewed. Descriptive data, including formulation, sun protection factor (SPF), ingredient type (chemical or physical), pigments used, shades available, additional benefits, price range, rating, and user reviews, were gathered. The authors extracted these data from the product information on the website, manufacturer claims, ratings, and reviewer comments on each of the listed sunscreens.

For each product, the content of the top 10 most helpful positive and negative reviews as voted by consumers (1160 total reviews, consisting of 1 or more comments) was analyzed. Two authors (H.D.L.G. and P.V.) coded consumer-reported comments for positive and negative descriptors into the categories of cosmetic elegance, performance, skin compatibility and tolerance, tone compatibility, and affordability. Cosmetic elegance was defined as any feature associated with skin sensation (eg, greasy), color (eg, white cast), scent, ability to blend, and overall appearance of the product on the skin. Product performance included SPF, effectiveness in preventing sunburn, coverage, and finish claims (ie, matte, glow, invisible). Skin compatibility and tolerance were represented in the reviewers’ comments and reflected how the product performed in association with underlying dermatologic conditions, skin type, and if there were any side effects such as irritation or allergic reactions. Tone compatibility referred to TS color similarity with users’ skin and shades available for individual products. Affordability reflected consumers’ perceptions of the product price. Comments may be included in multiple categories (eg, a product was noted to blend well on the skin but did not provide enough coverage). Of entries, 10% (116/1160 reviews) were coded by first author (H.D.L.G.) to ensure internal validity. Reviewer characteristics were consistently available and were used to determine the top 5 recommended products for light-, medium-, and dark-skinned individuals based on the number of 5-star ratings in each group. Porcelain, fair, and light were considered light skin tones. Medium, tan, and olive were considered medium skin tones. Deep, dark, and ebony were considered dark skin tones.

Results

Sunscreen Characteristics—Among the 161 screened products, 58 met the inclusion criteria. Four types of formulations were included: lotion, cream, liquid, and powder. Twenty-nine (50%) were creams, followed by lotions (19%), liquids (28%), and powders (3%). More than 79% (46/58) of products had a reported SPF of 30 or higher. Sunscreens with an active physical ingredient—the minerals TD and/or zinc oxide (ZO)—were most common (33/58 [57%]), followed by the chemical sunscreens avobenzone, octinoxate, oxybenzone, homosalate, octisalate, and/or octocrylene active ingredients (14/58 [24%]), and a combination of chemical and physical sunscreens (11/58 [19%]). Nearly all products (55/58 [95%]) contained pigmentary IO (red, CI 77491; yellow, CI 77492; black, CI 77499). Notably, only 38% (22/58) of products had more than 1 shade. All products had additional claims associated with being hydrating, having antiaging effects, smoothing texture, minimizing the appearance of pores, softening lines, and/or promoting even skin tone. Traditional physical sunscreens (those containing TD and/or ZO) were more expensive than chemical sunscreens, with a median price of $30. The median review rating was 4.5 of 5 stars, with a median of 2300 customer reviews per product. Findings are summarized in Table 1.

Tinted Sunscreen Characteristics and Descriptors of the Top 10 Most Helpful Positive and Negative Comments as Voted by Consumers

Positive Features of Sunscreens—Based on an analysis of total reviews (N=1160), cosmetic elegance was the most cited positive feature associated with TS products (31%), followed by product performance (10%). Skin compatibility and tolerance (7%), tone compatibility (7%), and affordability (7%) were cited less commonly as positive features. When negative features were cited, consumers mostly noted tone incompatibility (16%) and cosmetic elegance concerns (14%). Product performance (13%) was comparatively cited as a negative feature (Table 1). Exemplary positive comments categorized in cosmetic elegance included the subthemes of rubs in well and natural glow. Exemplary negative comments in cosmetic elegance and tone compatibility categories included the subthemes patchy/dry finish and color mismatch. Table 1 illustrates these findings.

 

 

Product Recommendations—The top 5 recommendations of the best TS for each skin tone are listed in Table 2. The mean price of the recommended products was $42 for 1 to 1.9 oz. Laura Mercier Tinted Moisturizer Oil Free Natural Skin Perfector broad spectrum SPF 20 (Laura Mercier) was the top product for all 3 groups. Similarly, of 58 products available, the same 5 products—Laura Mercier Tinted Moisturizer Oil Free Natural Skin Perfector broad spectrum SPF 20, IT Cosmetics CC+ Cream with SPF 50 (IT Cosmetics, LLC), Tarte Amazonian Clay BB Tinted Moisturizer Broad Spectrum SPF 20 (Tarte Cosmetics), NARS Pure Radiant Tinted Moisturizer Broad Spectrum SPF 30 (NARS Cosmetics), and Laura Mercier Tinted Moisturizer Natural Skin Perfector broad spectrum SPF 30—were considered the best among consumers of all skin tones, with the addition of 2 different products (bareMinerals Original Liquid Mineral Foundation Broad Spectrum SPF 20 [bareMinerals] and ILIA Super Serum Skin Tint SPF 40 Foundation [ILIA Beauty]) in the dark skin group. Notably, these products were the only ones on Sephora’s website that offered up to 30 (22 on average) different shades.

Top 5 Products as Rated by Reviewers With Light, Medium, and Dark Skin Tones

Comment

Tone Compatibility—Tinted sunscreens were created to extend the range of photoprotection into the VL spectrum. The goal of TSs is to incorporate pigments that blend in with the natural skin tone, produce a glow, and have an aesthetically pleasing appearance. To accommodate a variety of skin colors, different shades can be obtained by mixing different amounts of yellow, red, and black IO with or without PTD. The pigments and reflective compounds provide color, opacity, and a natural coverage. Our qualitative analysis provides information on the lack of diversity among shades available for TS, especially for darker skin tones. Of the 58 products evaluated, 62% (32/58) only had 1 shade. In our cohort, tone compatibility was the most commonly cited negative feature. Of note, 89% of these comments were from consumers with dark skin tones, and there was a disproportional number of reviews by darker-skinned individuals compared to users with light and medium skin tones. This is of particular importance, as TSs have been shown to protect against dermatoses that disproportionally affect individuals with skin of color. When comparing sunscreen formulations containing IO with regular mineral sunscreens, Dumbuya et al3 found that IO-containing formulations significantly protected against VL-induced pigmentation compared with untreated skin or mineral sunscreen with SPF 50 or higher in individuals with Fitzpatrick skin type IV (P<.001). Similarly, Bernstein et al8 found that exposing patients with Fitzpatrick skin types III and IV to blue-violet light resulted in marked hyperpigmentation that lasted up to 3 months. Visible light elicits immediate and persistent pigment darkening in individuals with Fitzpatrick skin phototype III and above via the photo-oxidation of pre-existing melanin and de novo melanogenesis.9 Tinted sunscreens formulated with IO have been shown to aid in the treatment of melasma and prevent hyperpigmentation in individuals with Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI.10 Patients with darker skin tones with dermatoses aggravated or induced by VL, such as melasma and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, may seek photoprotection provided by TS but find the lack of matching shades unappealing. The dearth of shade diversity that matches all skin tones can lead to inequities and disproportionally affect those with darker skin.

Performance—Tinted sunscreen formulations containing IO have been proven effective in protecting against high-energy VL, especially when combined synergistically with ZO.11 Kaye et al12 found that TSs containing IO and the inorganic filters TD or ZO reduced transmittance of VL more effectively than nontinted sunscreens containing TD or ZO alone or products containing organic filters. The decreased VL transmittance in the former is due to synergistic effects of the VL-scattering properties of the TD and the VL absorption properties of the IO. Similarly, Sayre et al13 demonstrated that IO was superior to TD and ZO in attenuating the transmission of VL. Bernstein et al14 found that darker shades containing higher percentages of IO increased the attenuation of VL to 98% compared with lighter shades attenuating 93%. This correlates with the results of prior studies highlighting the potential of TSs in protecting individuals with skin of color.3 In our cohort, comments regarding product performance and protection were mostly positive, claiming that consistent use reduced hyperpigmentation on the skin surface, giving the appearance of a more even skin tone.

Tolerability—Iron oxides are minerals known to be safe, gentle, and nontoxic on the surface of the skin.15 Two case reports of contact dermatitis due to IO have been reported.16,17 Within our cohort, only a few of the comments (6%) described negative product tolerance or compatibility with their skin type. However, it is more likely that these incompatibilities were due to other ingredients in the product or the individuals’ underlying dermatologic conditions.

Cosmetic Elegance—Most of the sunscreens available on the market today contain micronized forms of TD and ZO particles because they have better cosmetic acceptability.18 However, their reduced size compromises the protection provided against VL whereby the addition of IO is of vital importance. According to the RealSelf Sun Safety Report, only 11% of Americans wear sunscreen daily, and 46% never wear sunscreen.19 The most common reasons consumers reported for not wearing sunscreen included not liking how it looks on the skin, forgetting to apply it, and/or believing that application is inconvenient and time-consuming. Currently, TSs have been incorporated into daily-life products such as makeup, moisturizers, and serums, making application for users easy and convenient, decreasing the necessity of using multiple products, and offering the opportunity to choose from different presentations to make decisions for convenience and/or diverse occasions. Products containing IO blend in with the natural skin tone and have an aesthetically pleasing cosmetic appearance. In our cohort, comments regarding cosmetic elegance were highly valued and were present in multiple reviews (45%), with 69% being positive.

Affordability—In our cohort, product price was not predominantly mentioned in consumers’ reviews. However, negative comments regarding affordability were slightly higher than the positive (56% vs 44%). Notably, the mean price of our top recommendations was $42. Higher price was associated with products with a wider range of shades available. Prior studies have found similar results demonstrating that websites with recommendations on sunscreens for patients with skin of color compared with sunscreens for white or fair skin were more likely to recommend more expensive products (median, $14/oz vs $11.3/oz) despite the lower SPF level.20 According to Schneider,21 daily use of the cheapest sunscreen on the head/neck region recommended for white/pale skin ($2/oz) would lead to an annual cost of $61 compared to $182 for darker skin ($6/oz). This showcases the considerable variation in sunscreen prices for both populations that could potentiate disparities and vulnerability in the latter group.

Conclusion

Tinted sunscreens provide both functional and cosmetic benefits and are a safe, effective, and convenient way to protect against high-energy VL. This study suggests that patients with skin of color encounter difficulties in finding matching shades in TS products. These difficulties may stem from the lack of knowledge regarding dark complexions and undertones and the lack of representation of black and brown skin that has persisted in dermatology research journals and textbooks for decades.22 Our study provides important insights to help dermatologists improve their familiarity with the brands and characteristics of TSs geared to patients with all skin tones, including skin of color. Limitations include single-retailer information and inclusion of both highly and poorly rated comments with subjective data, limiting generalizability. The limited selection of shades for darker skin poses a roadblock to proper treatment and prevention. These data represent an area for improvement within the beauty industry and the dermatologic field to deliver culturally sensitive care by being knowledgeable about darker skin tones and TS formulations tailored to people with skin of color.

Sunscreen formulations typically protect from UV radiation (290–400 nm), as this is a well-established cause of photodamage, photoaging, and skin cancer.1 However, sunlight also consists of visible (400–700 nm) and infrared (>700 nm) radiation.2 In fact, UV radiation only comprises 5% to 7% of the solar radiation that reaches the surface of the earth, while visible and infrared lights comprise 44% and 53%, respectively.3 Visible light (VL) is the only portion of the solar spectrum visible to the human eye; it penetrates the skin to a depth range of 90 to 750 µm compared to 1.5 to 90 µm for UV radiation.4 Visible light also may come from artificial sources such as light bulbs and digital screens. The rapidly increasing use of smartphones, tablets, laptops, and other digital screens that emit high levels of short-wavelength VL has increased concerns about the safety of these devices. Although blue light exposure from screens is small compared with the amount of exposure from the sun, there is concern about the long-term effects of excessive screen time. Recent studies have demonstrated that exposure to light emitted from electronic devices, even for as little as 1 hour, may cause reactive oxygen species generation, apoptosis, collagen degradation, and necrosis of skin cells.5 Visible light increases tyrosinase activity and induces immediate erythema in light-skinned individuals and long-lasting pigmentation in dark-skinned individuals.4,6

Sunscreens consist of chemical and mineral active ingredients that contain UV filters designed to absorb, scatter, and reflect UV photons with wavelengths up to 380 nm. Historically, traditional options do not protect against the effects induced by VL, as these sunscreens use nanosized particles that help to reduce the white appearance and result in transparency of the product.7 To block VL, the topical agent must be visible. Tinted sunscreens (TSs) are products that combine UV and VL filters. They give a colored base coverage that is achieved by incorporating a blend of black, red, and yellow iron oxides (IOs) and/or pigmentary titanium dioxide (PTD)(ie, titanium dioxide [TD] that is not nanosized). Because TSs offer an instant glow and protect the skin from both sun and artificial light, they have become increasingly popular and have been incorporated into makeup and skin care products to facilitate daily convenient use.

The purpose of this analysis was to study current available options and product factors that may influence consumer preference when choosing a TS based on the reviewer characteristics.

 

Methods

The keyword sunscreen was searched in the broader category of skin care products on an online supplier of sunscreens (www.sephora.com). This supplier was chosen because, unlike other sources, specific reviewer characteristics regarding underlying skin tone also were available. The search produced 161 results. For the purpose of this analysis, only facial TSs containing IO and/or PTD were included. Each sunscreen was checked by the authors, and 58 sunscreens that met the inclusion criteria were identified and further reviewed. Descriptive data, including formulation, sun protection factor (SPF), ingredient type (chemical or physical), pigments used, shades available, additional benefits, price range, rating, and user reviews, were gathered. The authors extracted these data from the product information on the website, manufacturer claims, ratings, and reviewer comments on each of the listed sunscreens.

For each product, the content of the top 10 most helpful positive and negative reviews as voted by consumers (1160 total reviews, consisting of 1 or more comments) was analyzed. Two authors (H.D.L.G. and P.V.) coded consumer-reported comments for positive and negative descriptors into the categories of cosmetic elegance, performance, skin compatibility and tolerance, tone compatibility, and affordability. Cosmetic elegance was defined as any feature associated with skin sensation (eg, greasy), color (eg, white cast), scent, ability to blend, and overall appearance of the product on the skin. Product performance included SPF, effectiveness in preventing sunburn, coverage, and finish claims (ie, matte, glow, invisible). Skin compatibility and tolerance were represented in the reviewers’ comments and reflected how the product performed in association with underlying dermatologic conditions, skin type, and if there were any side effects such as irritation or allergic reactions. Tone compatibility referred to TS color similarity with users’ skin and shades available for individual products. Affordability reflected consumers’ perceptions of the product price. Comments may be included in multiple categories (eg, a product was noted to blend well on the skin but did not provide enough coverage). Of entries, 10% (116/1160 reviews) were coded by first author (H.D.L.G.) to ensure internal validity. Reviewer characteristics were consistently available and were used to determine the top 5 recommended products for light-, medium-, and dark-skinned individuals based on the number of 5-star ratings in each group. Porcelain, fair, and light were considered light skin tones. Medium, tan, and olive were considered medium skin tones. Deep, dark, and ebony were considered dark skin tones.

Results

Sunscreen Characteristics—Among the 161 screened products, 58 met the inclusion criteria. Four types of formulations were included: lotion, cream, liquid, and powder. Twenty-nine (50%) were creams, followed by lotions (19%), liquids (28%), and powders (3%). More than 79% (46/58) of products had a reported SPF of 30 or higher. Sunscreens with an active physical ingredient—the minerals TD and/or zinc oxide (ZO)—were most common (33/58 [57%]), followed by the chemical sunscreens avobenzone, octinoxate, oxybenzone, homosalate, octisalate, and/or octocrylene active ingredients (14/58 [24%]), and a combination of chemical and physical sunscreens (11/58 [19%]). Nearly all products (55/58 [95%]) contained pigmentary IO (red, CI 77491; yellow, CI 77492; black, CI 77499). Notably, only 38% (22/58) of products had more than 1 shade. All products had additional claims associated with being hydrating, having antiaging effects, smoothing texture, minimizing the appearance of pores, softening lines, and/or promoting even skin tone. Traditional physical sunscreens (those containing TD and/or ZO) were more expensive than chemical sunscreens, with a median price of $30. The median review rating was 4.5 of 5 stars, with a median of 2300 customer reviews per product. Findings are summarized in Table 1.

Tinted Sunscreen Characteristics and Descriptors of the Top 10 Most Helpful Positive and Negative Comments as Voted by Consumers

Positive Features of Sunscreens—Based on an analysis of total reviews (N=1160), cosmetic elegance was the most cited positive feature associated with TS products (31%), followed by product performance (10%). Skin compatibility and tolerance (7%), tone compatibility (7%), and affordability (7%) were cited less commonly as positive features. When negative features were cited, consumers mostly noted tone incompatibility (16%) and cosmetic elegance concerns (14%). Product performance (13%) was comparatively cited as a negative feature (Table 1). Exemplary positive comments categorized in cosmetic elegance included the subthemes of rubs in well and natural glow. Exemplary negative comments in cosmetic elegance and tone compatibility categories included the subthemes patchy/dry finish and color mismatch. Table 1 illustrates these findings.

 

 

Product Recommendations—The top 5 recommendations of the best TS for each skin tone are listed in Table 2. The mean price of the recommended products was $42 for 1 to 1.9 oz. Laura Mercier Tinted Moisturizer Oil Free Natural Skin Perfector broad spectrum SPF 20 (Laura Mercier) was the top product for all 3 groups. Similarly, of 58 products available, the same 5 products—Laura Mercier Tinted Moisturizer Oil Free Natural Skin Perfector broad spectrum SPF 20, IT Cosmetics CC+ Cream with SPF 50 (IT Cosmetics, LLC), Tarte Amazonian Clay BB Tinted Moisturizer Broad Spectrum SPF 20 (Tarte Cosmetics), NARS Pure Radiant Tinted Moisturizer Broad Spectrum SPF 30 (NARS Cosmetics), and Laura Mercier Tinted Moisturizer Natural Skin Perfector broad spectrum SPF 30—were considered the best among consumers of all skin tones, with the addition of 2 different products (bareMinerals Original Liquid Mineral Foundation Broad Spectrum SPF 20 [bareMinerals] and ILIA Super Serum Skin Tint SPF 40 Foundation [ILIA Beauty]) in the dark skin group. Notably, these products were the only ones on Sephora’s website that offered up to 30 (22 on average) different shades.

Top 5 Products as Rated by Reviewers With Light, Medium, and Dark Skin Tones

Comment

Tone Compatibility—Tinted sunscreens were created to extend the range of photoprotection into the VL spectrum. The goal of TSs is to incorporate pigments that blend in with the natural skin tone, produce a glow, and have an aesthetically pleasing appearance. To accommodate a variety of skin colors, different shades can be obtained by mixing different amounts of yellow, red, and black IO with or without PTD. The pigments and reflective compounds provide color, opacity, and a natural coverage. Our qualitative analysis provides information on the lack of diversity among shades available for TS, especially for darker skin tones. Of the 58 products evaluated, 62% (32/58) only had 1 shade. In our cohort, tone compatibility was the most commonly cited negative feature. Of note, 89% of these comments were from consumers with dark skin tones, and there was a disproportional number of reviews by darker-skinned individuals compared to users with light and medium skin tones. This is of particular importance, as TSs have been shown to protect against dermatoses that disproportionally affect individuals with skin of color. When comparing sunscreen formulations containing IO with regular mineral sunscreens, Dumbuya et al3 found that IO-containing formulations significantly protected against VL-induced pigmentation compared with untreated skin or mineral sunscreen with SPF 50 or higher in individuals with Fitzpatrick skin type IV (P<.001). Similarly, Bernstein et al8 found that exposing patients with Fitzpatrick skin types III and IV to blue-violet light resulted in marked hyperpigmentation that lasted up to 3 months. Visible light elicits immediate and persistent pigment darkening in individuals with Fitzpatrick skin phototype III and above via the photo-oxidation of pre-existing melanin and de novo melanogenesis.9 Tinted sunscreens formulated with IO have been shown to aid in the treatment of melasma and prevent hyperpigmentation in individuals with Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI.10 Patients with darker skin tones with dermatoses aggravated or induced by VL, such as melasma and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, may seek photoprotection provided by TS but find the lack of matching shades unappealing. The dearth of shade diversity that matches all skin tones can lead to inequities and disproportionally affect those with darker skin.

Performance—Tinted sunscreen formulations containing IO have been proven effective in protecting against high-energy VL, especially when combined synergistically with ZO.11 Kaye et al12 found that TSs containing IO and the inorganic filters TD or ZO reduced transmittance of VL more effectively than nontinted sunscreens containing TD or ZO alone or products containing organic filters. The decreased VL transmittance in the former is due to synergistic effects of the VL-scattering properties of the TD and the VL absorption properties of the IO. Similarly, Sayre et al13 demonstrated that IO was superior to TD and ZO in attenuating the transmission of VL. Bernstein et al14 found that darker shades containing higher percentages of IO increased the attenuation of VL to 98% compared with lighter shades attenuating 93%. This correlates with the results of prior studies highlighting the potential of TSs in protecting individuals with skin of color.3 In our cohort, comments regarding product performance and protection were mostly positive, claiming that consistent use reduced hyperpigmentation on the skin surface, giving the appearance of a more even skin tone.

Tolerability—Iron oxides are minerals known to be safe, gentle, and nontoxic on the surface of the skin.15 Two case reports of contact dermatitis due to IO have been reported.16,17 Within our cohort, only a few of the comments (6%) described negative product tolerance or compatibility with their skin type. However, it is more likely that these incompatibilities were due to other ingredients in the product or the individuals’ underlying dermatologic conditions.

Cosmetic Elegance—Most of the sunscreens available on the market today contain micronized forms of TD and ZO particles because they have better cosmetic acceptability.18 However, their reduced size compromises the protection provided against VL whereby the addition of IO is of vital importance. According to the RealSelf Sun Safety Report, only 11% of Americans wear sunscreen daily, and 46% never wear sunscreen.19 The most common reasons consumers reported for not wearing sunscreen included not liking how it looks on the skin, forgetting to apply it, and/or believing that application is inconvenient and time-consuming. Currently, TSs have been incorporated into daily-life products such as makeup, moisturizers, and serums, making application for users easy and convenient, decreasing the necessity of using multiple products, and offering the opportunity to choose from different presentations to make decisions for convenience and/or diverse occasions. Products containing IO blend in with the natural skin tone and have an aesthetically pleasing cosmetic appearance. In our cohort, comments regarding cosmetic elegance were highly valued and were present in multiple reviews (45%), with 69% being positive.

Affordability—In our cohort, product price was not predominantly mentioned in consumers’ reviews. However, negative comments regarding affordability were slightly higher than the positive (56% vs 44%). Notably, the mean price of our top recommendations was $42. Higher price was associated with products with a wider range of shades available. Prior studies have found similar results demonstrating that websites with recommendations on sunscreens for patients with skin of color compared with sunscreens for white or fair skin were more likely to recommend more expensive products (median, $14/oz vs $11.3/oz) despite the lower SPF level.20 According to Schneider,21 daily use of the cheapest sunscreen on the head/neck region recommended for white/pale skin ($2/oz) would lead to an annual cost of $61 compared to $182 for darker skin ($6/oz). This showcases the considerable variation in sunscreen prices for both populations that could potentiate disparities and vulnerability in the latter group.

Conclusion

Tinted sunscreens provide both functional and cosmetic benefits and are a safe, effective, and convenient way to protect against high-energy VL. This study suggests that patients with skin of color encounter difficulties in finding matching shades in TS products. These difficulties may stem from the lack of knowledge regarding dark complexions and undertones and the lack of representation of black and brown skin that has persisted in dermatology research journals and textbooks for decades.22 Our study provides important insights to help dermatologists improve their familiarity with the brands and characteristics of TSs geared to patients with all skin tones, including skin of color. Limitations include single-retailer information and inclusion of both highly and poorly rated comments with subjective data, limiting generalizability. The limited selection of shades for darker skin poses a roadblock to proper treatment and prevention. These data represent an area for improvement within the beauty industry and the dermatologic field to deliver culturally sensitive care by being knowledgeable about darker skin tones and TS formulations tailored to people with skin of color.

References
  1. McDaniel D, Farris P, Valacchi G. Atmospheric skin aging-contributors and inhibitors. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;17:124-137.
  2. Duteil L, Cardot-Leccia N, Queille-Roussel C, et al. Differences in visible light-induced pigmentation according to wavelengths: a clinical and histological study in comparison with UVB exposure. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014;27:822-826.
  3. Dumbuya H, Grimes PE, Lynch S, et al. Impact of iron-oxide containing formulations against visible light-induced skin pigmentation in skin of color individuals. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19:712-717.
  4. Lyons AB, Trullas C, Kohli I, et al. Photoprotection beyond ultraviolet radiation: a review of tinted sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:1393-1397.
  5. Austin E, Huang A, Adar T, et al. Electronic device generated light increases reactive oxygen species in human fibroblasts [published online February 5, 2018]. Lasers Surg Med. doi:10.1002/lsm.22794
  6. Randhawa M, Seo I, Liebel F, et al. Visible light induces melanogenesis in human skin through a photoadaptive response. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130949.
  7. Yeager DG, Lim HW. What’s new in photoprotection: a review of new concepts and controversies. Dermatol Clin. 2019;37:149-157.
  8. Bernstein EF, Sarkas HW, Boland P. Iron oxides in novel skin care formulations attenuate blue light for enhanced protection against skin damage. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20:532-537.
  9. Duteil L, Cardot-Leccia N, Queille-Roussel C, et al. Differences in visible light-induced pigmentation according to wavelengths: a clinical and histological study in comparison with UVB exposure. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014;27:822-826.
  10. Ruvolo E, Fair M, Hutson A, et al. Photoprotection against visible light-induced pigmentation. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2018;40:589-595.
  11. Cohen L, Brodsky MA, Zubair R, et al. Cutaneous interaction with visible light: what do we know. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;S0190-9622(20)30551-X.
  12. Kaye ET, Levin JA, Blank IH, et al. Efficiency of opaque photoprotective agents in the visible light range. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127:351-355.
  13. Sayre RM, Kollias N, Roberts RL, et al. Physical sunscreens. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1990;41:103-109.
  14. Bernstein EF, Sarkas HW, Boland P, et al. Beyond sun protection factor: an approach to environmental protection with novel mineral coatings in a vehicle containing a blend of skincare ingredients. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19:407-415.
  15. MacLeman E. Why are iron oxides used? Deep Science website. February 10, 2022. Accessed March 22, 2022. https://thedermreview.com/iron-oxides-ci-77491-ci-77492-ci-77499/
  16. Zugerman C. Contact dermatitis to yellow iron oxide. Contact Dermatitis. 1985;13:107-109.
  17. Saxena M, Warshaw E, Ahmed DD. Eyelid allergic contact dermatitis to black iron oxide. Am J Contact Dermat. 2001;12:38-39.
  18. Smijs TG, Pavel S. Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreens: focus on their safety and effectiveness. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2011;4:95-112.
  19. 2020 RealSelf Sun Safety Report: majority of Americans don’t use sunscreen daily. Practical Dermatology. May 6, 2020. Accessed March 22, 2022. https://practicaldermatology.com/news/realself-sun-safety-report-majority-of-americans-dont-use-sunscreen-daily
  20. Song H, Beckles A, Salian P, et al. Sunscreen recommendations for patients with skin of color in the popular press and in the dermatology clinic. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2020;7:165-170.
  21. Schneider J. The teaspoon rule of applying sunscreen. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:838-839.
  22. Nelson B. How dermatology is failing melanoma patients with skin of color: unanswered questions on risk and eye-opening disparities in outcomes are weighing heavily on melanoma patients with darker skin. in this article, part 1 of a 2-part series, we explore the deadly consequences of racism and inequality in cancer care. Cancer Cytopathol. 2020;128:7-8.
References
  1. McDaniel D, Farris P, Valacchi G. Atmospheric skin aging-contributors and inhibitors. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;17:124-137.
  2. Duteil L, Cardot-Leccia N, Queille-Roussel C, et al. Differences in visible light-induced pigmentation according to wavelengths: a clinical and histological study in comparison with UVB exposure. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014;27:822-826.
  3. Dumbuya H, Grimes PE, Lynch S, et al. Impact of iron-oxide containing formulations against visible light-induced skin pigmentation in skin of color individuals. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19:712-717.
  4. Lyons AB, Trullas C, Kohli I, et al. Photoprotection beyond ultraviolet radiation: a review of tinted sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:1393-1397.
  5. Austin E, Huang A, Adar T, et al. Electronic device generated light increases reactive oxygen species in human fibroblasts [published online February 5, 2018]. Lasers Surg Med. doi:10.1002/lsm.22794
  6. Randhawa M, Seo I, Liebel F, et al. Visible light induces melanogenesis in human skin through a photoadaptive response. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130949.
  7. Yeager DG, Lim HW. What’s new in photoprotection: a review of new concepts and controversies. Dermatol Clin. 2019;37:149-157.
  8. Bernstein EF, Sarkas HW, Boland P. Iron oxides in novel skin care formulations attenuate blue light for enhanced protection against skin damage. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20:532-537.
  9. Duteil L, Cardot-Leccia N, Queille-Roussel C, et al. Differences in visible light-induced pigmentation according to wavelengths: a clinical and histological study in comparison with UVB exposure. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014;27:822-826.
  10. Ruvolo E, Fair M, Hutson A, et al. Photoprotection against visible light-induced pigmentation. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2018;40:589-595.
  11. Cohen L, Brodsky MA, Zubair R, et al. Cutaneous interaction with visible light: what do we know. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;S0190-9622(20)30551-X.
  12. Kaye ET, Levin JA, Blank IH, et al. Efficiency of opaque photoprotective agents in the visible light range. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127:351-355.
  13. Sayre RM, Kollias N, Roberts RL, et al. Physical sunscreens. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1990;41:103-109.
  14. Bernstein EF, Sarkas HW, Boland P, et al. Beyond sun protection factor: an approach to environmental protection with novel mineral coatings in a vehicle containing a blend of skincare ingredients. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19:407-415.
  15. MacLeman E. Why are iron oxides used? Deep Science website. February 10, 2022. Accessed March 22, 2022. https://thedermreview.com/iron-oxides-ci-77491-ci-77492-ci-77499/
  16. Zugerman C. Contact dermatitis to yellow iron oxide. Contact Dermatitis. 1985;13:107-109.
  17. Saxena M, Warshaw E, Ahmed DD. Eyelid allergic contact dermatitis to black iron oxide. Am J Contact Dermat. 2001;12:38-39.
  18. Smijs TG, Pavel S. Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreens: focus on their safety and effectiveness. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2011;4:95-112.
  19. 2020 RealSelf Sun Safety Report: majority of Americans don’t use sunscreen daily. Practical Dermatology. May 6, 2020. Accessed March 22, 2022. https://practicaldermatology.com/news/realself-sun-safety-report-majority-of-americans-dont-use-sunscreen-daily
  20. Song H, Beckles A, Salian P, et al. Sunscreen recommendations for patients with skin of color in the popular press and in the dermatology clinic. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2020;7:165-170.
  21. Schneider J. The teaspoon rule of applying sunscreen. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:838-839.
  22. Nelson B. How dermatology is failing melanoma patients with skin of color: unanswered questions on risk and eye-opening disparities in outcomes are weighing heavily on melanoma patients with darker skin. in this article, part 1 of a 2-part series, we explore the deadly consequences of racism and inequality in cancer care. Cancer Cytopathol. 2020;128:7-8.
Issue
Cutis - 109(4)
Issue
Cutis - 109(4)
Page Number
198-203
Page Number
198-203
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Tinted Sunscreens: Consumer Preferences Based on Light, Medium, and Dark Skin Tones
Display Headline
Tinted Sunscreens: Consumer Preferences Based on Light, Medium, and Dark Skin Tones
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Visible light has been shown to increase tyrosinase activity and induce immediate erythema in light-skinned individuals and long-lasting pigmentation in dark-skinned individuals.
  • The formulation of sunscreens with iron oxides and pigmentary titanium dioxide are a safe and effective way to protect against high-energy visible light, especially when combined with zinc oxide.
  • Physicians should be aware of sunscreen characteristics that patients like and dislike to tailor recommendations that are appropriate for each individual to enhance adherence.
  • Cosmetic elegance and tone compatibility are the most important criteria for individuals seeking tinted sunscreens.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media

The Leaky Pipeline: A Narrative Review of Diversity in Dermatology

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/10/2022 - 12:36
Display Headline
The Leaky Pipeline: A Narrative Review of Diversity in Dermatology
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society

With a majority-minority population expected in the United States by 2044, improving diversity and cultural competency in the dermatology workforce is now more important than ever. A more diverse workforce increases the cultural competence of all providers, provides greater opportunities for mentorship and sponsorship of underrepresented minority (URM) trainees, establishes a more inclusive environment for learners, and enhances the knowledge and productivity of the workforce.1-3 Additionally, it is imperative to address clinical care disparities seen in minority patients in dermatology, including treatment of skin cancer, psoriasis, acne, atopic dermatitis, and other diseases.4-7

Despite the attention that has been devoted to improving diversity in medicine,8-10 dermatology remains one of the least diverse specialties, prompting additional calls to action within the field.11 Why does the lack of diversity still exist in dermatology, and what is the path to correcting this problem? In this article, we review the evidence of diversity barriers at different stages of medical education training that may impede academic advancement for minority learners pursuing careers in dermatology.

Undergraduate Medical Education

The term leaky pipeline refers to the progressive decline in the number of URMs along a given career path, including in dermatology. The Association of American Medical Colleges defines URMs as racial/ethnic populations that are “underrepresented in the medical profession relative to their numbers in the general population.”9 The first leak in the pipeline is that URMs are not applying to medical school. From 2002 and 2017, rates of both application and matriculation to medical school were lower by 30% to 70% in URM groups compared to White students, including Hispanic, Black, and American Indian/Alaska Native students.12,13 The decision not to apply to medical school was greater in URM undergraduate students irrespective of scholastic ability as measured by SAT scores.14

A striking statistic is that the number of Black men matriculating into medical school in 2014 was less than it was in 1978 despite the increase in the number of US medical schools and efforts to recruit more diverse student populations. The Association of American Medical Colleges identified potential reasons for this decline, including poor early education, lack of mentorship, negative perceptions of Black men due to racial stereotypes, and lack of financial and academic resources to support the application process.8,13,15-17 Implicit racial bias by admission committees also may play a role.

Medical School Matriculation and Applying to Dermatology Residency

There is greater representation of URM students in medical school than in dermatology residency, which means URM students are either not applying to dermatology programs or they are not matching into the specialty. In the Electronic Residency Application Service’s 2016-2017 application cycle (N=776), there were 76 (9.8%) URM dermatology residency applicants.18 In 2018, there was a notable decline in representation of Black students among residency applicants (4.9%) to matched residents (3.7%), and there were only 133 (9.3%) URM dermatology residents in total (PGY2-PGY4 classes).19 The lack of exposure to medical subspecialties and the recommendation by medical schools for URM medical students to pursue careers in primary care have been cited as reasons that these students may not apply to residency programs in specialty care.20,21 The presence of an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education dermatology residency program, fellowships, and dermatology interest groups at their medical schools correlated with higher proportions of URM students applying to dermatology programs.20

Underrepresented minority students face critical challenges during medical school, including receiving lower grades in both standardized and school-designated assessments and clerkship grades.21,22 A 2019 National Board of Medical Examiners study found that Hispanic and Black test takers scored 12.1 and 16.6 points lower than White men, respectively, on the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1.23 Black and Asian students also were less likely than White students to be selected as members of the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society (AΩA), even after accounting for USMLE Step 1 scores, research productivity, community service, leadership, and Gold Humanism Honor Society membership.24 Taken together, the emphasis on clinical grades, USMLE scores, and AΩA status as recruitment and selection criteria likely deters URM students from applying to and may preclude them from successfully matching into highly selective specialties such as dermatology.25

A recent cross-sectional study showed that lack of equitable resources, lack of support, financial constrictions, and lack of group identity were 4 barriers to URM students matching into dermatology.26 Dermatology is a competitive specialty with the highest median Electronic Residency Application Service applications submitted per US applicant (n=90)27 and an approximate total cost per US applicant of $10,781.28,29 Disadvantaged URM applicants noted relying on loans while non-URM applicants cited family financial support as being beneficial.26 In addition, an increasing number of applicants take gap years for research, which pose additional costs for finances and resources. In contrast, mentorship and participation in pipeline/enrichment programs were factors associated with URM students matching into dermatology.26

 

 

Dermatology Residency and the Transition to Advanced Dermatology Fellowships

Similar to the transition from medical school into dermatology residency, URM dermatology residents are either not applying to fellowships or are not getting in. In the 2018-2019 academic year, there were no Black, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, or American Indian/Alaska Native Mohs micrographic surgery and dermatologic oncology fellows.19 Similarly, there were no Black, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, or American Indian/Alaska Native dermatopathology fellows. There were 4 (6%) Hispanic dermatopathology fellows.19

There also is marked underrepresentation of minority groups—and minimal growth over time—in the dermatology procedural subspecialty. Whereas the percentage of female Mohs surgeons increased considerably from 1985 to 2005 (12.7% to 40.9%, respectively), the percentage of URM Mohs surgeons remained steady from 4.2% to 4.6%, respectively, and remained at 4.5% in 2014.30

There are no available data on the race/ethnicity of fellowship applicants, as these demographic data for the application process have not been consistently or traditionally collected. The reasons why there are so few URM dermatology fellows is not known; whether this is due to a lack of mentorship or whether other factors lead to residents not applying for advanced training needs further study. Financial factors related to prolonged training, which include lower salaries and delayed loan repayment, may present barriers to applying to fellowships.

Lack of URM Academic Faculty in Dermatology

At the academic faculty level, URM representation continues to worsen. Lett et al31 found that there is declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine relative to US census data for 16 US medical specialties, including dermatology, with growing underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic faculty at the associate professor and full professor levels and underrepresentation in all faculty ranks. From 1970 to 2018, URM faculty in dermatology only increased from 4.8% to 7.4%, respectively. Non-URM female and male faculty members increased by 13.8 and 10.8 faculty members per year, respectively, while URM female and male faculty members increased by 1.2 and 0.8 faculty members per year, respectively.32

Underrepresentation of minorities seen in dermatology faculty may result from clinical demands, minority taxation (defined as the extensive service requirements uniquely experienced by URM faculty to disproportionately serve as representatives on academic committees and to mentor URM students), and barriers to academic promotion, which are challenges uniquely encountered by URMs in academic dermatology.33 Increased clinical demand may result from the fact that URM physicians are more likely to care for underserved populations, those of lower socioeconomic status, non-English–speaking patients, those on Medicaid, and those who are uninsured, which may impact renumeration. Minority tax experienced by URM faculty includes mentoring URM medical students, providing cultural expertise to departments and institutions, and participating in community service projects and outreach programs. Specifically, many institutional committees require the participation of a URM member, resulting in URM faculty members experiencing higher committee service burden. Many, if not all, of these responsibilities often are not compensated through salary or academic promotion.

A Call to Action

There are several steps that can be taken to create a pathway to dermatology that is inclusive, flexible, and supportive of URMs.

Increase early exposure to dermatology in medical school. Early exposure and mentorship opportunities are associated with higher rates of students pursuing specialty field careers.34 Increased early opportunities allow for URM students to consider and explore a career in dermatology; receive mentorship; and ensure that dermatology, including topics related to skin of color (SOC), is incorporated into their learning. The American Academy of Dermatology has contributed to these efforts by its presence at every national meeting of the Student National Medical Association and Latino Medical Student Association, as well as its involvement with Nth Dimensions, which offers various educational opportunities for URM medical students.

Implement equitable grading and holistic review processes in medical school. Racial/ethnic differences in clinical grading and standardized test scores in medical school demonstrate why holistic review of dermatology residency applicants is needed and why other metrics such as USMLE scores and AΩA status should be de-emphasized or eliminated when evaluating candidates. To support equity, many medical schools have eliminated honors grading, and some schools have eliminated AΩA distinction.

 

 

Increase diversity of dermatology residents and residency programs. Implicit bias training for a medical school admissions committee has been shown to increase diversity in medical school enrollment.35 Whether implicit bias training and other diversity training may benefit dermatology residency selection must be examined, including study of unintended consequences, such as reduced diversity, increased microaggressions toward minority colleagues, and the illusion of fairness.36-39 Increasing representation is not sufficient—creating inclusive residency training environments is a critical parallel aim. Prioritizing diversity in dermatology residency recruitment is imperative. Creating dermatology residency positions specifically for URM residents may be an important option, as done at the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and Duke University (Durham, North Carolina).

Create effective programs for URM mentorship. Due to the competitive nature of dermatology residency, the need for mentors in dermatology is critically vital for URM medical students, especially those without a home dermatology program at their medical school. Further development of formal mentorship and pipeline programs is essential at both the local and national levels. Some national examples of these initiatives include diversity mentorship programs offered by the American Academy of Dermatology, Skin of Color Society, Women’s Dermatologic Society, and Student National Medical Association. Many institutional programs also offer invaluable opportunities, such as the summer research fellowship at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF); visiting clerkship grants for URMs at the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, Maryland); and integrated programs, such as the Visiting Elective Scholarship Program at UCSF, which provides funding and faculty mentorship for URM students completing an away rotation at UCSF.

Establish longitudinal skin-of-color curricula and increased opportunities for research. More robust SOC training may lead to an increasingly diverse workforce. It is important that medical student and dermatology resident and fellow education include training on SOC to ensure high-quality care to diverse patient populations, which also may enhance the knowledge of trainees, encourage clinical and research interest in this field, and reduce health care disparities. Increasing research opportunities and offering formalized longitudinal training in SOC as well as incorporating more diverse images in medical school education may foster greater interest in this field at a time when trainees are establishing their career interests. At present, there is considerable room for improvement. Nijhawan et al40 surveyed 63 dermatology chief residents and 41 program directors and found only 14.3% and 14.6%, respectively, reported having an expert who conducts clinic specializing in SOC. Only 52.4% and 65.9% reported having didactic sessions or lectures focused on SOC diseases, and 30.2% and 12.2% reported having a dedicated rotation for residents to gain experience in SOC.40 A more recent study showed that when faculty were asked to incorporate more SOC content into lectures, the most commonly identified barrier to implementation was a lack of SOC images.41 Additionally, there remains a paucity of published research on this topic, with SOC articles representing only 2.7% of the literature.42 These numbers demonstrate the continued need for a more inclusive and comprehensive curriculum in dermatology residency programs and more robust funding for SOC research.

Recruit and support URM faculty. Increasing diversity in dermatology residency programs likely will increase the number of potential URMs pursuing additional fellowship training and academic dermatology with active career mentorship and support. In addition, promoting faculty retention by combatting the progressive loss of URMs at all faculty levels is paramount. Mentorship for URM physicians has been shown to play a key role in the decision to pursue academic medicine as well as academic productivity and job satisfaction.43,44 The visibility, cultural competency, clinical work, academic productivity, and mentorship efforts that URM faculty provide are essential to enhancing patient care, teaching diverse groups of learners, and recruiting more diverse trainees. Protected time to participate in professional development opportunities has been shown to improve recruitment and retention of URM faculty and offer additional opportunities for junior faculty to find mentors.35,36 Incentivizing clinical care of underserved populations also may augment financial stability for URM physicians who choose to care for these patients. Finally, diversity work and community service should be legitimized and count toward faculty promotion.

Conclusion

There are numerous factors that contribute to the leaky pipeline in dermatology (eFigure). Many challenges that are unique to the URM population disadvantage these students from entering medical school, applying to dermatology residency, matching into dermatology fellowships, pursuing and staying in faculty positions, and achieving faculty advancement into leadership positions. With each progressive step along this trajectory, there is less minority representation. All dermatologists, regardless of race/ethnicity, need to play an active role and must prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts at all levels of education and training for the betterment of the specialty.

Schematic of the leaky pipeline in dermatology and potential action items and solutions at each stage of academic development
eFIGURE. Schematic of the leaky pipeline in dermatology and potential action items and solutions at each stage of academic development. Asterisk indicates unpublished data, Association of American Medical Colleges Diversity in Medicine: Facts and Figures, 2013.

References
  1. Dixon G, Kind T, Wright J, et al. Factors that influence the choice of academic pediatrics by underrepresented minorities. Pediatrics. 2019;144:E20182759. doi:10.1542/peds.2018-2759
  2. Yehia BR, Cronholm PF, Wilson N, et al. Mentorship and pursuit of academic medicine careers: a mixed methods study of residents from diverse backgrounds. BMC Med Educ. 2014:14:2-26. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-26
  3. Saha S, Guiton G, Wimmers PF, et al. Student body racial and ethnic composition and diversity-related outcomes in US medical schools. JAMA. 2008;300:1135-1145. doi:10.1001/jama.300.10.1135
  4. Hsu DY, Gordon K, Silverberg JI. The patient burden of psoriasis in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75:33-41. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.03.048
  5. Silverberg JI. Racial and ethnic disparities in atopic dermatitis. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2015;4:44-48.
  6. Buster KJ, Sevens EI, Elmets CA. Dermatologic health disparities. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30:53-59. doi:10.1016/j.det.2011.08.002
  7. Barbieri JS, Shin DB, Wang S, et al. Association of race/ethnicity with differences in health care use and treatment for acne. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:312-319. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4818
  8. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Colburn L, et al. The Right Thing To Do, The Smart Thing to Do: Enhancing Diversity in the Health Professions. National Academies Press; 2001.
  9. Association of American Medical Colleges. Minorities in medical education: fact and figures 2019. Accessed December 9, 2021. https://www.aamc.org/datareports/workforce/report/diversity-medicine-facts-and-figures-2019
  10. Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) standards on diversity. University of South Florida Health website. Accessed December 9, 2021. https://health.usf.edu/~/media/Files/Medicine/MD%20Program/Diversity/LCMEStandardsonDiversity1.ashx?la=en
  11. Granstein RD, Cornelius L, Shinkai K. Diversity in dermatology—a call for action. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:499-500. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0296
  12. Lett LA, Murdock HM, Orji W, et al. Trends in racial/ethnic representation among US medical students. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e1910490. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10490
  13. Association of American Medical Colleges. Altering the course: Black males in medicine. Published 2015. Accessed December 8, 2021. https://store.aamc.org/downloadable/download/sample/sample_id/84/
  14. Barr DA, Gonzalez ME, Wanat SF. The leaky pipeline: factors associated with early decline in interest in premedical studies among underrepresented minority undergraduate students. Acad Med. 2008;83:5:503-511. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31816bda16
  15. Flores RL. The rising gap between rich and poor: a look at the persistence of educational disparities in the United States and why we should worry. Cogent Soc Sci. 2017;3:1323698.
  16. Jackson D. Why am I behind? an examination of low income and minority students’ preparedness for college. McNair Sch J. 2012;13:121-138.
  17. Rothstein R. The racial achievement gap, segregated schools, andsegregated neighborhoods: a constitutional insult. Race Soc Probl. 2015;7:21-30.
  18. Association of American Medical Colleges. Residency Applicants From US MD Granting Medical Schools to ACGME-Accredited Programs by Specialty and Race/Ethnicity. Association of American Medical Colleges; 2017.
  19. Brotherton SE, Etzel SL. Graduate medical education, 2018-2019. JAMA. 2019;322:996-1016. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.10155
  20. Barnes LA, Bae GH, Nambudiri V. Sex and racial/ethnic diversity of US medical students and their exposure to dermatology programs. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155:490-491. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5025
  21. Soliman YS, Rzepecki AK, Guzman AK. Understanding perceived barriers of minority medical students pursuing a career in dermatology. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155:252-254. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4813
  22. Low D, Pollack SW, Liao Z, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in clinical grading in medical school. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31:487-496. doi:10.1080/10401334.2019.1597724
  23. Rubright JD, Jodoin M, Barone MA. Examining demographics, prior academic performance and United States medical licensing examination scores. Acad Med. 2019;94;364-370. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002366
  24. Boatright D, Ross D, O’Connor P, et al. Racial disparities in medical student membership in the alpha omega honor society. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:659-665. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9623
  25. Gorouhi F, Alikhan A, Rezaei A, et al. Dermatology residency selection criteria with an emphasis on program characteristics: a national program director survey [published online March 17, 2014]. Dermatol Res Pract. doi:10.1155/2014/692760
  26. Vasquez R, Jeong H, Florez-Pollack S, et al. What are the barriers faced by underrepresented minorities applying to dermatology? a qualitative cross-sectional study of applicants applying to a large dermatology residency program. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:1770-1773. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.067
  27. Results of the 2019 NRMP applicant survey by preferred specialty and applicant type. National Resident Matching Program website. Published July 2019. Accessed December 8, 2021. https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Applicant-Survey-Report-2019.pdf
  28. Mansouri B, Walker GD, Mitchell J, et al. The cost of applying to dermatology residency: 2014 data estimates. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:754-756. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.10.049
  29. Polacco MA, Lally J, Walls A, et al. Digging into debt: the financial burden associated with the otolaryngology match. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;12:1091-1096. doi:10.1177/0194599816686538
  30. Feng H, Feng PW, Geronemus RG. Diversity in the US Mohs micrographic surgery workforce. Dermatol Surg. 2020:46:1451-1455. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000002080
  31. Lett LA, Orji WU, Sebro R. Declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine: a longitudinal study of 16 US medical specialties. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0207274. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.020727432. Xierali IM, Nivet MA, Pandya AG. US Dermatology department faculty diversity trends by sex and underrepresented-in-medicine status, 1970-2018. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:280-287. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4297
  32. Okoye GA. Supporting underrepresented minority women in academic dermatology. Intl J Womens Dermatol. 2020;6:57-60. doi:10.1016/j.ijwd.2019.09.009
  33. Bernstein J, Dicaprio MR, Mehta S. The relationship between required medical school instruction in musculoskeletal medicine and application rates to orthopaedic surgery residency programs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2335-2338. doi:10.2106/00004623-200410000-00031
  34. Capers Q, Clinchot D, McDougle L, et al. Implicit racial bias in medical school admissions. Acad Med. 2017;92:365-369. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001388
  35. Dobbin F, Kalev A. Why diversity programs fail. Harvard Business Rev. 2016;52-60. Accessed December 8, 2021. https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diversity-programs-fail
  36. Kalev A, Dobbin F, Kelly E. Best practices or best guesses? assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. Am Sociol Rev. 2006;71:589-617.
  37. Sanchez JI, Medkik N. The effects of diversity awareness training on differential treatment. Group Organ Manag. 2004;29:517-536.
  38. Kaiser CR, Major B, Jurcevic I, et al. Presumed fair: ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013;104:504-519. doi:10.1037/a0030838
  39. Nijhawan RI, Jacob SE, Woolery-Lloyd H. Skin of color education in dermatology residency programs: does residency training reflect the changing demographics of the United States? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59:615-617.
  40. Jia JL, Gordon JS, Lester JC, et al. Integrating skin of color and sexual and gender minority content into dermatology residency curricula: a prospective program initiative [published online April 16, 2021]. J Am Acad Dermatol. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.04.018
  41. Amuzie AU, Lia JL, Taylor SC, et al. Skin of color article representation in dermatology literature 2009-2019: higher citation counts and opportunities for inclusion [published online March 24, 2021]. J Am Acad Dermatol. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.063
  42. Beech BM, Calles-Escandon J, Hairston KC, et al. Mentoring programs for underrepresented minority faculty in academic medical center: a systematic review of the literature. Acad Med. 2013;88:541-549. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828589e3
  43. Daley S, Wingard DL, Reznik V. Improving the retention of underrepresented minority faculty in academic medicine. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98:1435-1440. doi:10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31449-8
  44. Association of American Medical Colleges. US medical school faculty by sex, race/ethnicity, rank, and department, 2019. Published December 31, 2019. Accessed December 20, 2021. https://www.aamc.org/media/8476/download?attachment
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Williams is from the Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio. Dr. Shinkai is from the Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

The eFigure is available in the Appendix online at www.mdedge.com/dermatology.

Correspondence: Kiyanna Williams, MD, 2049 E 100th St, Cleveland, OH 44106 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 109(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
27-E1
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Williams is from the Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio. Dr. Shinkai is from the Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

The eFigure is available in the Appendix online at www.mdedge.com/dermatology.

Correspondence: Kiyanna Williams, MD, 2049 E 100th St, Cleveland, OH 44106 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Williams is from the Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio. Dr. Shinkai is from the Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

The eFigure is available in the Appendix online at www.mdedge.com/dermatology.

Correspondence: Kiyanna Williams, MD, 2049 E 100th St, Cleveland, OH 44106 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society

With a majority-minority population expected in the United States by 2044, improving diversity and cultural competency in the dermatology workforce is now more important than ever. A more diverse workforce increases the cultural competence of all providers, provides greater opportunities for mentorship and sponsorship of underrepresented minority (URM) trainees, establishes a more inclusive environment for learners, and enhances the knowledge and productivity of the workforce.1-3 Additionally, it is imperative to address clinical care disparities seen in minority patients in dermatology, including treatment of skin cancer, psoriasis, acne, atopic dermatitis, and other diseases.4-7

Despite the attention that has been devoted to improving diversity in medicine,8-10 dermatology remains one of the least diverse specialties, prompting additional calls to action within the field.11 Why does the lack of diversity still exist in dermatology, and what is the path to correcting this problem? In this article, we review the evidence of diversity barriers at different stages of medical education training that may impede academic advancement for minority learners pursuing careers in dermatology.

Undergraduate Medical Education

The term leaky pipeline refers to the progressive decline in the number of URMs along a given career path, including in dermatology. The Association of American Medical Colleges defines URMs as racial/ethnic populations that are “underrepresented in the medical profession relative to their numbers in the general population.”9 The first leak in the pipeline is that URMs are not applying to medical school. From 2002 and 2017, rates of both application and matriculation to medical school were lower by 30% to 70% in URM groups compared to White students, including Hispanic, Black, and American Indian/Alaska Native students.12,13 The decision not to apply to medical school was greater in URM undergraduate students irrespective of scholastic ability as measured by SAT scores.14

A striking statistic is that the number of Black men matriculating into medical school in 2014 was less than it was in 1978 despite the increase in the number of US medical schools and efforts to recruit more diverse student populations. The Association of American Medical Colleges identified potential reasons for this decline, including poor early education, lack of mentorship, negative perceptions of Black men due to racial stereotypes, and lack of financial and academic resources to support the application process.8,13,15-17 Implicit racial bias by admission committees also may play a role.

Medical School Matriculation and Applying to Dermatology Residency

There is greater representation of URM students in medical school than in dermatology residency, which means URM students are either not applying to dermatology programs or they are not matching into the specialty. In the Electronic Residency Application Service’s 2016-2017 application cycle (N=776), there were 76 (9.8%) URM dermatology residency applicants.18 In 2018, there was a notable decline in representation of Black students among residency applicants (4.9%) to matched residents (3.7%), and there were only 133 (9.3%) URM dermatology residents in total (PGY2-PGY4 classes).19 The lack of exposure to medical subspecialties and the recommendation by medical schools for URM medical students to pursue careers in primary care have been cited as reasons that these students may not apply to residency programs in specialty care.20,21 The presence of an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education dermatology residency program, fellowships, and dermatology interest groups at their medical schools correlated with higher proportions of URM students applying to dermatology programs.20

Underrepresented minority students face critical challenges during medical school, including receiving lower grades in both standardized and school-designated assessments and clerkship grades.21,22 A 2019 National Board of Medical Examiners study found that Hispanic and Black test takers scored 12.1 and 16.6 points lower than White men, respectively, on the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1.23 Black and Asian students also were less likely than White students to be selected as members of the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society (AΩA), even after accounting for USMLE Step 1 scores, research productivity, community service, leadership, and Gold Humanism Honor Society membership.24 Taken together, the emphasis on clinical grades, USMLE scores, and AΩA status as recruitment and selection criteria likely deters URM students from applying to and may preclude them from successfully matching into highly selective specialties such as dermatology.25

A recent cross-sectional study showed that lack of equitable resources, lack of support, financial constrictions, and lack of group identity were 4 barriers to URM students matching into dermatology.26 Dermatology is a competitive specialty with the highest median Electronic Residency Application Service applications submitted per US applicant (n=90)27 and an approximate total cost per US applicant of $10,781.28,29 Disadvantaged URM applicants noted relying on loans while non-URM applicants cited family financial support as being beneficial.26 In addition, an increasing number of applicants take gap years for research, which pose additional costs for finances and resources. In contrast, mentorship and participation in pipeline/enrichment programs were factors associated with URM students matching into dermatology.26

 

 

Dermatology Residency and the Transition to Advanced Dermatology Fellowships

Similar to the transition from medical school into dermatology residency, URM dermatology residents are either not applying to fellowships or are not getting in. In the 2018-2019 academic year, there were no Black, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, or American Indian/Alaska Native Mohs micrographic surgery and dermatologic oncology fellows.19 Similarly, there were no Black, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, or American Indian/Alaska Native dermatopathology fellows. There were 4 (6%) Hispanic dermatopathology fellows.19

There also is marked underrepresentation of minority groups—and minimal growth over time—in the dermatology procedural subspecialty. Whereas the percentage of female Mohs surgeons increased considerably from 1985 to 2005 (12.7% to 40.9%, respectively), the percentage of URM Mohs surgeons remained steady from 4.2% to 4.6%, respectively, and remained at 4.5% in 2014.30

There are no available data on the race/ethnicity of fellowship applicants, as these demographic data for the application process have not been consistently or traditionally collected. The reasons why there are so few URM dermatology fellows is not known; whether this is due to a lack of mentorship or whether other factors lead to residents not applying for advanced training needs further study. Financial factors related to prolonged training, which include lower salaries and delayed loan repayment, may present barriers to applying to fellowships.

Lack of URM Academic Faculty in Dermatology

At the academic faculty level, URM representation continues to worsen. Lett et al31 found that there is declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine relative to US census data for 16 US medical specialties, including dermatology, with growing underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic faculty at the associate professor and full professor levels and underrepresentation in all faculty ranks. From 1970 to 2018, URM faculty in dermatology only increased from 4.8% to 7.4%, respectively. Non-URM female and male faculty members increased by 13.8 and 10.8 faculty members per year, respectively, while URM female and male faculty members increased by 1.2 and 0.8 faculty members per year, respectively.32

Underrepresentation of minorities seen in dermatology faculty may result from clinical demands, minority taxation (defined as the extensive service requirements uniquely experienced by URM faculty to disproportionately serve as representatives on academic committees and to mentor URM students), and barriers to academic promotion, which are challenges uniquely encountered by URMs in academic dermatology.33 Increased clinical demand may result from the fact that URM physicians are more likely to care for underserved populations, those of lower socioeconomic status, non-English–speaking patients, those on Medicaid, and those who are uninsured, which may impact renumeration. Minority tax experienced by URM faculty includes mentoring URM medical students, providing cultural expertise to departments and institutions, and participating in community service projects and outreach programs. Specifically, many institutional committees require the participation of a URM member, resulting in URM faculty members experiencing higher committee service burden. Many, if not all, of these responsibilities often are not compensated through salary or academic promotion.

A Call to Action

There are several steps that can be taken to create a pathway to dermatology that is inclusive, flexible, and supportive of URMs.

Increase early exposure to dermatology in medical school. Early exposure and mentorship opportunities are associated with higher rates of students pursuing specialty field careers.34 Increased early opportunities allow for URM students to consider and explore a career in dermatology; receive mentorship; and ensure that dermatology, including topics related to skin of color (SOC), is incorporated into their learning. The American Academy of Dermatology has contributed to these efforts by its presence at every national meeting of the Student National Medical Association and Latino Medical Student Association, as well as its involvement with Nth Dimensions, which offers various educational opportunities for URM medical students.

Implement equitable grading and holistic review processes in medical school. Racial/ethnic differences in clinical grading and standardized test scores in medical school demonstrate why holistic review of dermatology residency applicants is needed and why other metrics such as USMLE scores and AΩA status should be de-emphasized or eliminated when evaluating candidates. To support equity, many medical schools have eliminated honors grading, and some schools have eliminated AΩA distinction.

 

 

Increase diversity of dermatology residents and residency programs. Implicit bias training for a medical school admissions committee has been shown to increase diversity in medical school enrollment.35 Whether implicit bias training and other diversity training may benefit dermatology residency selection must be examined, including study of unintended consequences, such as reduced diversity, increased microaggressions toward minority colleagues, and the illusion of fairness.36-39 Increasing representation is not sufficient—creating inclusive residency training environments is a critical parallel aim. Prioritizing diversity in dermatology residency recruitment is imperative. Creating dermatology residency positions specifically for URM residents may be an important option, as done at the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and Duke University (Durham, North Carolina).

Create effective programs for URM mentorship. Due to the competitive nature of dermatology residency, the need for mentors in dermatology is critically vital for URM medical students, especially those without a home dermatology program at their medical school. Further development of formal mentorship and pipeline programs is essential at both the local and national levels. Some national examples of these initiatives include diversity mentorship programs offered by the American Academy of Dermatology, Skin of Color Society, Women’s Dermatologic Society, and Student National Medical Association. Many institutional programs also offer invaluable opportunities, such as the summer research fellowship at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF); visiting clerkship grants for URMs at the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, Maryland); and integrated programs, such as the Visiting Elective Scholarship Program at UCSF, which provides funding and faculty mentorship for URM students completing an away rotation at UCSF.

Establish longitudinal skin-of-color curricula and increased opportunities for research. More robust SOC training may lead to an increasingly diverse workforce. It is important that medical student and dermatology resident and fellow education include training on SOC to ensure high-quality care to diverse patient populations, which also may enhance the knowledge of trainees, encourage clinical and research interest in this field, and reduce health care disparities. Increasing research opportunities and offering formalized longitudinal training in SOC as well as incorporating more diverse images in medical school education may foster greater interest in this field at a time when trainees are establishing their career interests. At present, there is considerable room for improvement. Nijhawan et al40 surveyed 63 dermatology chief residents and 41 program directors and found only 14.3% and 14.6%, respectively, reported having an expert who conducts clinic specializing in SOC. Only 52.4% and 65.9% reported having didactic sessions or lectures focused on SOC diseases, and 30.2% and 12.2% reported having a dedicated rotation for residents to gain experience in SOC.40 A more recent study showed that when faculty were asked to incorporate more SOC content into lectures, the most commonly identified barrier to implementation was a lack of SOC images.41 Additionally, there remains a paucity of published research on this topic, with SOC articles representing only 2.7% of the literature.42 These numbers demonstrate the continued need for a more inclusive and comprehensive curriculum in dermatology residency programs and more robust funding for SOC research.

Recruit and support URM faculty. Increasing diversity in dermatology residency programs likely will increase the number of potential URMs pursuing additional fellowship training and academic dermatology with active career mentorship and support. In addition, promoting faculty retention by combatting the progressive loss of URMs at all faculty levels is paramount. Mentorship for URM physicians has been shown to play a key role in the decision to pursue academic medicine as well as academic productivity and job satisfaction.43,44 The visibility, cultural competency, clinical work, academic productivity, and mentorship efforts that URM faculty provide are essential to enhancing patient care, teaching diverse groups of learners, and recruiting more diverse trainees. Protected time to participate in professional development opportunities has been shown to improve recruitment and retention of URM faculty and offer additional opportunities for junior faculty to find mentors.35,36 Incentivizing clinical care of underserved populations also may augment financial stability for URM physicians who choose to care for these patients. Finally, diversity work and community service should be legitimized and count toward faculty promotion.

Conclusion

There are numerous factors that contribute to the leaky pipeline in dermatology (eFigure). Many challenges that are unique to the URM population disadvantage these students from entering medical school, applying to dermatology residency, matching into dermatology fellowships, pursuing and staying in faculty positions, and achieving faculty advancement into leadership positions. With each progressive step along this trajectory, there is less minority representation. All dermatologists, regardless of race/ethnicity, need to play an active role and must prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts at all levels of education and training for the betterment of the specialty.

Schematic of the leaky pipeline in dermatology and potential action items and solutions at each stage of academic development
eFIGURE. Schematic of the leaky pipeline in dermatology and potential action items and solutions at each stage of academic development. Asterisk indicates unpublished data, Association of American Medical Colleges Diversity in Medicine: Facts and Figures, 2013.

With a majority-minority population expected in the United States by 2044, improving diversity and cultural competency in the dermatology workforce is now more important than ever. A more diverse workforce increases the cultural competence of all providers, provides greater opportunities for mentorship and sponsorship of underrepresented minority (URM) trainees, establishes a more inclusive environment for learners, and enhances the knowledge and productivity of the workforce.1-3 Additionally, it is imperative to address clinical care disparities seen in minority patients in dermatology, including treatment of skin cancer, psoriasis, acne, atopic dermatitis, and other diseases.4-7

Despite the attention that has been devoted to improving diversity in medicine,8-10 dermatology remains one of the least diverse specialties, prompting additional calls to action within the field.11 Why does the lack of diversity still exist in dermatology, and what is the path to correcting this problem? In this article, we review the evidence of diversity barriers at different stages of medical education training that may impede academic advancement for minority learners pursuing careers in dermatology.

Undergraduate Medical Education

The term leaky pipeline refers to the progressive decline in the number of URMs along a given career path, including in dermatology. The Association of American Medical Colleges defines URMs as racial/ethnic populations that are “underrepresented in the medical profession relative to their numbers in the general population.”9 The first leak in the pipeline is that URMs are not applying to medical school. From 2002 and 2017, rates of both application and matriculation to medical school were lower by 30% to 70% in URM groups compared to White students, including Hispanic, Black, and American Indian/Alaska Native students.12,13 The decision not to apply to medical school was greater in URM undergraduate students irrespective of scholastic ability as measured by SAT scores.14

A striking statistic is that the number of Black men matriculating into medical school in 2014 was less than it was in 1978 despite the increase in the number of US medical schools and efforts to recruit more diverse student populations. The Association of American Medical Colleges identified potential reasons for this decline, including poor early education, lack of mentorship, negative perceptions of Black men due to racial stereotypes, and lack of financial and academic resources to support the application process.8,13,15-17 Implicit racial bias by admission committees also may play a role.

Medical School Matriculation and Applying to Dermatology Residency

There is greater representation of URM students in medical school than in dermatology residency, which means URM students are either not applying to dermatology programs or they are not matching into the specialty. In the Electronic Residency Application Service’s 2016-2017 application cycle (N=776), there were 76 (9.8%) URM dermatology residency applicants.18 In 2018, there was a notable decline in representation of Black students among residency applicants (4.9%) to matched residents (3.7%), and there were only 133 (9.3%) URM dermatology residents in total (PGY2-PGY4 classes).19 The lack of exposure to medical subspecialties and the recommendation by medical schools for URM medical students to pursue careers in primary care have been cited as reasons that these students may not apply to residency programs in specialty care.20,21 The presence of an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education dermatology residency program, fellowships, and dermatology interest groups at their medical schools correlated with higher proportions of URM students applying to dermatology programs.20

Underrepresented minority students face critical challenges during medical school, including receiving lower grades in both standardized and school-designated assessments and clerkship grades.21,22 A 2019 National Board of Medical Examiners study found that Hispanic and Black test takers scored 12.1 and 16.6 points lower than White men, respectively, on the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1.23 Black and Asian students also were less likely than White students to be selected as members of the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society (AΩA), even after accounting for USMLE Step 1 scores, research productivity, community service, leadership, and Gold Humanism Honor Society membership.24 Taken together, the emphasis on clinical grades, USMLE scores, and AΩA status as recruitment and selection criteria likely deters URM students from applying to and may preclude them from successfully matching into highly selective specialties such as dermatology.25

A recent cross-sectional study showed that lack of equitable resources, lack of support, financial constrictions, and lack of group identity were 4 barriers to URM students matching into dermatology.26 Dermatology is a competitive specialty with the highest median Electronic Residency Application Service applications submitted per US applicant (n=90)27 and an approximate total cost per US applicant of $10,781.28,29 Disadvantaged URM applicants noted relying on loans while non-URM applicants cited family financial support as being beneficial.26 In addition, an increasing number of applicants take gap years for research, which pose additional costs for finances and resources. In contrast, mentorship and participation in pipeline/enrichment programs were factors associated with URM students matching into dermatology.26

 

 

Dermatology Residency and the Transition to Advanced Dermatology Fellowships

Similar to the transition from medical school into dermatology residency, URM dermatology residents are either not applying to fellowships or are not getting in. In the 2018-2019 academic year, there were no Black, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, or American Indian/Alaska Native Mohs micrographic surgery and dermatologic oncology fellows.19 Similarly, there were no Black, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, or American Indian/Alaska Native dermatopathology fellows. There were 4 (6%) Hispanic dermatopathology fellows.19

There also is marked underrepresentation of minority groups—and minimal growth over time—in the dermatology procedural subspecialty. Whereas the percentage of female Mohs surgeons increased considerably from 1985 to 2005 (12.7% to 40.9%, respectively), the percentage of URM Mohs surgeons remained steady from 4.2% to 4.6%, respectively, and remained at 4.5% in 2014.30

There are no available data on the race/ethnicity of fellowship applicants, as these demographic data for the application process have not been consistently or traditionally collected. The reasons why there are so few URM dermatology fellows is not known; whether this is due to a lack of mentorship or whether other factors lead to residents not applying for advanced training needs further study. Financial factors related to prolonged training, which include lower salaries and delayed loan repayment, may present barriers to applying to fellowships.

Lack of URM Academic Faculty in Dermatology

At the academic faculty level, URM representation continues to worsen. Lett et al31 found that there is declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine relative to US census data for 16 US medical specialties, including dermatology, with growing underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic faculty at the associate professor and full professor levels and underrepresentation in all faculty ranks. From 1970 to 2018, URM faculty in dermatology only increased from 4.8% to 7.4%, respectively. Non-URM female and male faculty members increased by 13.8 and 10.8 faculty members per year, respectively, while URM female and male faculty members increased by 1.2 and 0.8 faculty members per year, respectively.32

Underrepresentation of minorities seen in dermatology faculty may result from clinical demands, minority taxation (defined as the extensive service requirements uniquely experienced by URM faculty to disproportionately serve as representatives on academic committees and to mentor URM students), and barriers to academic promotion, which are challenges uniquely encountered by URMs in academic dermatology.33 Increased clinical demand may result from the fact that URM physicians are more likely to care for underserved populations, those of lower socioeconomic status, non-English–speaking patients, those on Medicaid, and those who are uninsured, which may impact renumeration. Minority tax experienced by URM faculty includes mentoring URM medical students, providing cultural expertise to departments and institutions, and participating in community service projects and outreach programs. Specifically, many institutional committees require the participation of a URM member, resulting in URM faculty members experiencing higher committee service burden. Many, if not all, of these responsibilities often are not compensated through salary or academic promotion.

A Call to Action

There are several steps that can be taken to create a pathway to dermatology that is inclusive, flexible, and supportive of URMs.

Increase early exposure to dermatology in medical school. Early exposure and mentorship opportunities are associated with higher rates of students pursuing specialty field careers.34 Increased early opportunities allow for URM students to consider and explore a career in dermatology; receive mentorship; and ensure that dermatology, including topics related to skin of color (SOC), is incorporated into their learning. The American Academy of Dermatology has contributed to these efforts by its presence at every national meeting of the Student National Medical Association and Latino Medical Student Association, as well as its involvement with Nth Dimensions, which offers various educational opportunities for URM medical students.

Implement equitable grading and holistic review processes in medical school. Racial/ethnic differences in clinical grading and standardized test scores in medical school demonstrate why holistic review of dermatology residency applicants is needed and why other metrics such as USMLE scores and AΩA status should be de-emphasized or eliminated when evaluating candidates. To support equity, many medical schools have eliminated honors grading, and some schools have eliminated AΩA distinction.

 

 

Increase diversity of dermatology residents and residency programs. Implicit bias training for a medical school admissions committee has been shown to increase diversity in medical school enrollment.35 Whether implicit bias training and other diversity training may benefit dermatology residency selection must be examined, including study of unintended consequences, such as reduced diversity, increased microaggressions toward minority colleagues, and the illusion of fairness.36-39 Increasing representation is not sufficient—creating inclusive residency training environments is a critical parallel aim. Prioritizing diversity in dermatology residency recruitment is imperative. Creating dermatology residency positions specifically for URM residents may be an important option, as done at the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and Duke University (Durham, North Carolina).

Create effective programs for URM mentorship. Due to the competitive nature of dermatology residency, the need for mentors in dermatology is critically vital for URM medical students, especially those without a home dermatology program at their medical school. Further development of formal mentorship and pipeline programs is essential at both the local and national levels. Some national examples of these initiatives include diversity mentorship programs offered by the American Academy of Dermatology, Skin of Color Society, Women’s Dermatologic Society, and Student National Medical Association. Many institutional programs also offer invaluable opportunities, such as the summer research fellowship at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF); visiting clerkship grants for URMs at the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, Maryland); and integrated programs, such as the Visiting Elective Scholarship Program at UCSF, which provides funding and faculty mentorship for URM students completing an away rotation at UCSF.

Establish longitudinal skin-of-color curricula and increased opportunities for research. More robust SOC training may lead to an increasingly diverse workforce. It is important that medical student and dermatology resident and fellow education include training on SOC to ensure high-quality care to diverse patient populations, which also may enhance the knowledge of trainees, encourage clinical and research interest in this field, and reduce health care disparities. Increasing research opportunities and offering formalized longitudinal training in SOC as well as incorporating more diverse images in medical school education may foster greater interest in this field at a time when trainees are establishing their career interests. At present, there is considerable room for improvement. Nijhawan et al40 surveyed 63 dermatology chief residents and 41 program directors and found only 14.3% and 14.6%, respectively, reported having an expert who conducts clinic specializing in SOC. Only 52.4% and 65.9% reported having didactic sessions or lectures focused on SOC diseases, and 30.2% and 12.2% reported having a dedicated rotation for residents to gain experience in SOC.40 A more recent study showed that when faculty were asked to incorporate more SOC content into lectures, the most commonly identified barrier to implementation was a lack of SOC images.41 Additionally, there remains a paucity of published research on this topic, with SOC articles representing only 2.7% of the literature.42 These numbers demonstrate the continued need for a more inclusive and comprehensive curriculum in dermatology residency programs and more robust funding for SOC research.

Recruit and support URM faculty. Increasing diversity in dermatology residency programs likely will increase the number of potential URMs pursuing additional fellowship training and academic dermatology with active career mentorship and support. In addition, promoting faculty retention by combatting the progressive loss of URMs at all faculty levels is paramount. Mentorship for URM physicians has been shown to play a key role in the decision to pursue academic medicine as well as academic productivity and job satisfaction.43,44 The visibility, cultural competency, clinical work, academic productivity, and mentorship efforts that URM faculty provide are essential to enhancing patient care, teaching diverse groups of learners, and recruiting more diverse trainees. Protected time to participate in professional development opportunities has been shown to improve recruitment and retention of URM faculty and offer additional opportunities for junior faculty to find mentors.35,36 Incentivizing clinical care of underserved populations also may augment financial stability for URM physicians who choose to care for these patients. Finally, diversity work and community service should be legitimized and count toward faculty promotion.

Conclusion

There are numerous factors that contribute to the leaky pipeline in dermatology (eFigure). Many challenges that are unique to the URM population disadvantage these students from entering medical school, applying to dermatology residency, matching into dermatology fellowships, pursuing and staying in faculty positions, and achieving faculty advancement into leadership positions. With each progressive step along this trajectory, there is less minority representation. All dermatologists, regardless of race/ethnicity, need to play an active role and must prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts at all levels of education and training for the betterment of the specialty.

Schematic of the leaky pipeline in dermatology and potential action items and solutions at each stage of academic development
eFIGURE. Schematic of the leaky pipeline in dermatology and potential action items and solutions at each stage of academic development. Asterisk indicates unpublished data, Association of American Medical Colleges Diversity in Medicine: Facts and Figures, 2013.

References
  1. Dixon G, Kind T, Wright J, et al. Factors that influence the choice of academic pediatrics by underrepresented minorities. Pediatrics. 2019;144:E20182759. doi:10.1542/peds.2018-2759
  2. Yehia BR, Cronholm PF, Wilson N, et al. Mentorship and pursuit of academic medicine careers: a mixed methods study of residents from diverse backgrounds. BMC Med Educ. 2014:14:2-26. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-26
  3. Saha S, Guiton G, Wimmers PF, et al. Student body racial and ethnic composition and diversity-related outcomes in US medical schools. JAMA. 2008;300:1135-1145. doi:10.1001/jama.300.10.1135
  4. Hsu DY, Gordon K, Silverberg JI. The patient burden of psoriasis in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75:33-41. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.03.048
  5. Silverberg JI. Racial and ethnic disparities in atopic dermatitis. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2015;4:44-48.
  6. Buster KJ, Sevens EI, Elmets CA. Dermatologic health disparities. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30:53-59. doi:10.1016/j.det.2011.08.002
  7. Barbieri JS, Shin DB, Wang S, et al. Association of race/ethnicity with differences in health care use and treatment for acne. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:312-319. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4818
  8. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Colburn L, et al. The Right Thing To Do, The Smart Thing to Do: Enhancing Diversity in the Health Professions. National Academies Press; 2001.
  9. Association of American Medical Colleges. Minorities in medical education: fact and figures 2019. Accessed December 9, 2021. https://www.aamc.org/datareports/workforce/report/diversity-medicine-facts-and-figures-2019
  10. Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) standards on diversity. University of South Florida Health website. Accessed December 9, 2021. https://health.usf.edu/~/media/Files/Medicine/MD%20Program/Diversity/LCMEStandardsonDiversity1.ashx?la=en
  11. Granstein RD, Cornelius L, Shinkai K. Diversity in dermatology—a call for action. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:499-500. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0296
  12. Lett LA, Murdock HM, Orji W, et al. Trends in racial/ethnic representation among US medical students. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e1910490. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10490
  13. Association of American Medical Colleges. Altering the course: Black males in medicine. Published 2015. Accessed December 8, 2021. https://store.aamc.org/downloadable/download/sample/sample_id/84/
  14. Barr DA, Gonzalez ME, Wanat SF. The leaky pipeline: factors associated with early decline in interest in premedical studies among underrepresented minority undergraduate students. Acad Med. 2008;83:5:503-511. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31816bda16
  15. Flores RL. The rising gap between rich and poor: a look at the persistence of educational disparities in the United States and why we should worry. Cogent Soc Sci. 2017;3:1323698.
  16. Jackson D. Why am I behind? an examination of low income and minority students’ preparedness for college. McNair Sch J. 2012;13:121-138.
  17. Rothstein R. The racial achievement gap, segregated schools, andsegregated neighborhoods: a constitutional insult. Race Soc Probl. 2015;7:21-30.
  18. Association of American Medical Colleges. Residency Applicants From US MD Granting Medical Schools to ACGME-Accredited Programs by Specialty and Race/Ethnicity. Association of American Medical Colleges; 2017.
  19. Brotherton SE, Etzel SL. Graduate medical education, 2018-2019. JAMA. 2019;322:996-1016. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.10155
  20. Barnes LA, Bae GH, Nambudiri V. Sex and racial/ethnic diversity of US medical students and their exposure to dermatology programs. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155:490-491. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5025
  21. Soliman YS, Rzepecki AK, Guzman AK. Understanding perceived barriers of minority medical students pursuing a career in dermatology. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155:252-254. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4813
  22. Low D, Pollack SW, Liao Z, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in clinical grading in medical school. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31:487-496. doi:10.1080/10401334.2019.1597724
  23. Rubright JD, Jodoin M, Barone MA. Examining demographics, prior academic performance and United States medical licensing examination scores. Acad Med. 2019;94;364-370. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002366
  24. Boatright D, Ross D, O’Connor P, et al. Racial disparities in medical student membership in the alpha omega honor society. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:659-665. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9623
  25. Gorouhi F, Alikhan A, Rezaei A, et al. Dermatology residency selection criteria with an emphasis on program characteristics: a national program director survey [published online March 17, 2014]. Dermatol Res Pract. doi:10.1155/2014/692760
  26. Vasquez R, Jeong H, Florez-Pollack S, et al. What are the barriers faced by underrepresented minorities applying to dermatology? a qualitative cross-sectional study of applicants applying to a large dermatology residency program. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:1770-1773. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.067
  27. Results of the 2019 NRMP applicant survey by preferred specialty and applicant type. National Resident Matching Program website. Published July 2019. Accessed December 8, 2021. https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Applicant-Survey-Report-2019.pdf
  28. Mansouri B, Walker GD, Mitchell J, et al. The cost of applying to dermatology residency: 2014 data estimates. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:754-756. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.10.049
  29. Polacco MA, Lally J, Walls A, et al. Digging into debt: the financial burden associated with the otolaryngology match. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;12:1091-1096. doi:10.1177/0194599816686538
  30. Feng H, Feng PW, Geronemus RG. Diversity in the US Mohs micrographic surgery workforce. Dermatol Surg. 2020:46:1451-1455. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000002080
  31. Lett LA, Orji WU, Sebro R. Declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine: a longitudinal study of 16 US medical specialties. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0207274. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.020727432. Xierali IM, Nivet MA, Pandya AG. US Dermatology department faculty diversity trends by sex and underrepresented-in-medicine status, 1970-2018. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:280-287. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4297
  32. Okoye GA. Supporting underrepresented minority women in academic dermatology. Intl J Womens Dermatol. 2020;6:57-60. doi:10.1016/j.ijwd.2019.09.009
  33. Bernstein J, Dicaprio MR, Mehta S. The relationship between required medical school instruction in musculoskeletal medicine and application rates to orthopaedic surgery residency programs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2335-2338. doi:10.2106/00004623-200410000-00031
  34. Capers Q, Clinchot D, McDougle L, et al. Implicit racial bias in medical school admissions. Acad Med. 2017;92:365-369. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001388
  35. Dobbin F, Kalev A. Why diversity programs fail. Harvard Business Rev. 2016;52-60. Accessed December 8, 2021. https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diversity-programs-fail
  36. Kalev A, Dobbin F, Kelly E. Best practices or best guesses? assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. Am Sociol Rev. 2006;71:589-617.
  37. Sanchez JI, Medkik N. The effects of diversity awareness training on differential treatment. Group Organ Manag. 2004;29:517-536.
  38. Kaiser CR, Major B, Jurcevic I, et al. Presumed fair: ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013;104:504-519. doi:10.1037/a0030838
  39. Nijhawan RI, Jacob SE, Woolery-Lloyd H. Skin of color education in dermatology residency programs: does residency training reflect the changing demographics of the United States? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59:615-617.
  40. Jia JL, Gordon JS, Lester JC, et al. Integrating skin of color and sexual and gender minority content into dermatology residency curricula: a prospective program initiative [published online April 16, 2021]. J Am Acad Dermatol. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.04.018
  41. Amuzie AU, Lia JL, Taylor SC, et al. Skin of color article representation in dermatology literature 2009-2019: higher citation counts and opportunities for inclusion [published online March 24, 2021]. J Am Acad Dermatol. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.063
  42. Beech BM, Calles-Escandon J, Hairston KC, et al. Mentoring programs for underrepresented minority faculty in academic medical center: a systematic review of the literature. Acad Med. 2013;88:541-549. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828589e3
  43. Daley S, Wingard DL, Reznik V. Improving the retention of underrepresented minority faculty in academic medicine. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98:1435-1440. doi:10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31449-8
  44. Association of American Medical Colleges. US medical school faculty by sex, race/ethnicity, rank, and department, 2019. Published December 31, 2019. Accessed December 20, 2021. https://www.aamc.org/media/8476/download?attachment
References
  1. Dixon G, Kind T, Wright J, et al. Factors that influence the choice of academic pediatrics by underrepresented minorities. Pediatrics. 2019;144:E20182759. doi:10.1542/peds.2018-2759
  2. Yehia BR, Cronholm PF, Wilson N, et al. Mentorship and pursuit of academic medicine careers: a mixed methods study of residents from diverse backgrounds. BMC Med Educ. 2014:14:2-26. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-26
  3. Saha S, Guiton G, Wimmers PF, et al. Student body racial and ethnic composition and diversity-related outcomes in US medical schools. JAMA. 2008;300:1135-1145. doi:10.1001/jama.300.10.1135
  4. Hsu DY, Gordon K, Silverberg JI. The patient burden of psoriasis in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75:33-41. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.03.048
  5. Silverberg JI. Racial and ethnic disparities in atopic dermatitis. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2015;4:44-48.
  6. Buster KJ, Sevens EI, Elmets CA. Dermatologic health disparities. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30:53-59. doi:10.1016/j.det.2011.08.002
  7. Barbieri JS, Shin DB, Wang S, et al. Association of race/ethnicity with differences in health care use and treatment for acne. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:312-319. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4818
  8. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Colburn L, et al. The Right Thing To Do, The Smart Thing to Do: Enhancing Diversity in the Health Professions. National Academies Press; 2001.
  9. Association of American Medical Colleges. Minorities in medical education: fact and figures 2019. Accessed December 9, 2021. https://www.aamc.org/datareports/workforce/report/diversity-medicine-facts-and-figures-2019
  10. Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) standards on diversity. University of South Florida Health website. Accessed December 9, 2021. https://health.usf.edu/~/media/Files/Medicine/MD%20Program/Diversity/LCMEStandardsonDiversity1.ashx?la=en
  11. Granstein RD, Cornelius L, Shinkai K. Diversity in dermatology—a call for action. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:499-500. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0296
  12. Lett LA, Murdock HM, Orji W, et al. Trends in racial/ethnic representation among US medical students. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e1910490. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10490
  13. Association of American Medical Colleges. Altering the course: Black males in medicine. Published 2015. Accessed December 8, 2021. https://store.aamc.org/downloadable/download/sample/sample_id/84/
  14. Barr DA, Gonzalez ME, Wanat SF. The leaky pipeline: factors associated with early decline in interest in premedical studies among underrepresented minority undergraduate students. Acad Med. 2008;83:5:503-511. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31816bda16
  15. Flores RL. The rising gap between rich and poor: a look at the persistence of educational disparities in the United States and why we should worry. Cogent Soc Sci. 2017;3:1323698.
  16. Jackson D. Why am I behind? an examination of low income and minority students’ preparedness for college. McNair Sch J. 2012;13:121-138.
  17. Rothstein R. The racial achievement gap, segregated schools, andsegregated neighborhoods: a constitutional insult. Race Soc Probl. 2015;7:21-30.
  18. Association of American Medical Colleges. Residency Applicants From US MD Granting Medical Schools to ACGME-Accredited Programs by Specialty and Race/Ethnicity. Association of American Medical Colleges; 2017.
  19. Brotherton SE, Etzel SL. Graduate medical education, 2018-2019. JAMA. 2019;322:996-1016. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.10155
  20. Barnes LA, Bae GH, Nambudiri V. Sex and racial/ethnic diversity of US medical students and their exposure to dermatology programs. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155:490-491. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5025
  21. Soliman YS, Rzepecki AK, Guzman AK. Understanding perceived barriers of minority medical students pursuing a career in dermatology. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155:252-254. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4813
  22. Low D, Pollack SW, Liao Z, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in clinical grading in medical school. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31:487-496. doi:10.1080/10401334.2019.1597724
  23. Rubright JD, Jodoin M, Barone MA. Examining demographics, prior academic performance and United States medical licensing examination scores. Acad Med. 2019;94;364-370. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002366
  24. Boatright D, Ross D, O’Connor P, et al. Racial disparities in medical student membership in the alpha omega honor society. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:659-665. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9623
  25. Gorouhi F, Alikhan A, Rezaei A, et al. Dermatology residency selection criteria with an emphasis on program characteristics: a national program director survey [published online March 17, 2014]. Dermatol Res Pract. doi:10.1155/2014/692760
  26. Vasquez R, Jeong H, Florez-Pollack S, et al. What are the barriers faced by underrepresented minorities applying to dermatology? a qualitative cross-sectional study of applicants applying to a large dermatology residency program. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:1770-1773. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.067
  27. Results of the 2019 NRMP applicant survey by preferred specialty and applicant type. National Resident Matching Program website. Published July 2019. Accessed December 8, 2021. https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Applicant-Survey-Report-2019.pdf
  28. Mansouri B, Walker GD, Mitchell J, et al. The cost of applying to dermatology residency: 2014 data estimates. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:754-756. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.10.049
  29. Polacco MA, Lally J, Walls A, et al. Digging into debt: the financial burden associated with the otolaryngology match. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;12:1091-1096. doi:10.1177/0194599816686538
  30. Feng H, Feng PW, Geronemus RG. Diversity in the US Mohs micrographic surgery workforce. Dermatol Surg. 2020:46:1451-1455. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000002080
  31. Lett LA, Orji WU, Sebro R. Declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine: a longitudinal study of 16 US medical specialties. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0207274. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.020727432. Xierali IM, Nivet MA, Pandya AG. US Dermatology department faculty diversity trends by sex and underrepresented-in-medicine status, 1970-2018. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:280-287. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4297
  32. Okoye GA. Supporting underrepresented minority women in academic dermatology. Intl J Womens Dermatol. 2020;6:57-60. doi:10.1016/j.ijwd.2019.09.009
  33. Bernstein J, Dicaprio MR, Mehta S. The relationship between required medical school instruction in musculoskeletal medicine and application rates to orthopaedic surgery residency programs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2335-2338. doi:10.2106/00004623-200410000-00031
  34. Capers Q, Clinchot D, McDougle L, et al. Implicit racial bias in medical school admissions. Acad Med. 2017;92:365-369. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001388
  35. Dobbin F, Kalev A. Why diversity programs fail. Harvard Business Rev. 2016;52-60. Accessed December 8, 2021. https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diversity-programs-fail
  36. Kalev A, Dobbin F, Kelly E. Best practices or best guesses? assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. Am Sociol Rev. 2006;71:589-617.
  37. Sanchez JI, Medkik N. The effects of diversity awareness training on differential treatment. Group Organ Manag. 2004;29:517-536.
  38. Kaiser CR, Major B, Jurcevic I, et al. Presumed fair: ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013;104:504-519. doi:10.1037/a0030838
  39. Nijhawan RI, Jacob SE, Woolery-Lloyd H. Skin of color education in dermatology residency programs: does residency training reflect the changing demographics of the United States? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59:615-617.
  40. Jia JL, Gordon JS, Lester JC, et al. Integrating skin of color and sexual and gender minority content into dermatology residency curricula: a prospective program initiative [published online April 16, 2021]. J Am Acad Dermatol. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.04.018
  41. Amuzie AU, Lia JL, Taylor SC, et al. Skin of color article representation in dermatology literature 2009-2019: higher citation counts and opportunities for inclusion [published online March 24, 2021]. J Am Acad Dermatol. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.063
  42. Beech BM, Calles-Escandon J, Hairston KC, et al. Mentoring programs for underrepresented minority faculty in academic medical center: a systematic review of the literature. Acad Med. 2013;88:541-549. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828589e3
  43. Daley S, Wingard DL, Reznik V. Improving the retention of underrepresented minority faculty in academic medicine. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98:1435-1440. doi:10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31449-8
  44. Association of American Medical Colleges. US medical school faculty by sex, race/ethnicity, rank, and department, 2019. Published December 31, 2019. Accessed December 20, 2021. https://www.aamc.org/media/8476/download?attachment
Issue
Cutis - 109(1)
Issue
Cutis - 109(1)
Page Number
27-E1
Page Number
27-E1
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
The Leaky Pipeline: A Narrative Review of Diversity in Dermatology
Display Headline
The Leaky Pipeline: A Narrative Review of Diversity in Dermatology
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Dermatology remains the second least diverse specialty in medicine, which has important implications for the workforce and clinical excellence of the specialty.
  • Barriers presenting at different stages of medical education and training result in the loss of underrepresented minority (URM) learners pursuing or advancing careers in dermatology.
  • Understanding these barriers is the first step to creating and implementing important structural changes to the way we mentor, teach, and support URM students in the specialty.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media

Skin of Color in Preclinical Medical Education: A Cross-Institutional Comparison and A Call to Action

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 10/15/2021 - 12:27
Display Headline
Skin of Color in Preclinical Medical Education: A Cross-Institutional Comparison and A Call to Action
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society

A ccording to the US Census Bureau, more than half of all Americans are projected to belong to a minority group, defined as any group other than non-Hispanic White alone, by 2044. 1 Consequently, the United States rapidly is becoming a country in which the majority of citizens will have skin of color. Individuals with skin of color are of diverse ethnic backgrounds and include people of African, Latin American, Native American, Pacific Islander, and Asian descent, as well as interethnic backgrounds. 2 Throughout the country, dermatologists along with primary care practitioners may be confronted with certain cutaneous conditions that have varying disease presentations or processes in patients with skin of color. It also is important to note that racial categories are socially rather than biologically constructed, and the term skin of color includes a wide variety of diverse skin types. Nevertheless, the current literature thoroughly supports unique pathophysiologic differences in skin of color as well as variations in disease manifestation compared to White patients. 3-5 For example, the increased lability of melanosomes in skin of color patients, which increases their risk for postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, has been well documented. 5-7 There are various dermatologic conditions that also occur with higher frequency and manifest uniquely in people with darker, more pigmented skin, 7-9 and dermatologists, along with primary care physicians, should feel prepared to recognize and address them.

Extensive evidence also indicates that there are unique aspects to consider while managing certain skin diseases in patients with skin of color.8,10,11 Consequently, as noted on the Skin of Color Society (SOCS) website, “[a]n increase in the body of dermatological literature concerning skin of color as well as the advancement of both basic science and clinical investigational research is necessary to meet the needs of the expanding skin of color population.”2 In the meantime, current knowledge regarding cutaneous conditions that diversely or disproportionately affect skin of color should be actively disseminated to physicians in training. Although patients with skin of color should always have access to comprehensive care and knowledgeable practitioners, the current changes in national and regional demographics further underscore the need for a more thorough understanding of skin of color with regard to disease pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.

Several studies have found that medical students in the United States are minimally exposed to dermatology in general compared to other clinical specialties,12-14 which can easily lead to the underrecognition of disorders that may uniquely or disproportionately affect individuals with pigmented skin. Recent data showed that medical schools typically required fewer than 10 hours of dermatology instruction,12 and on average, dermatologic training made up less than 1% of a medical student’s undergraduate medical education.13,15,16 Consequently, less than 40% of primary care residents felt that their medical school curriculum adequately prepared them to manage common skin conditions.14 Although not all physicians should be expected to fully grasp the complexities of skin of color and its diagnostic and therapeutic implications, both practicing and training dermatologists have acknowledged a lack of exposure to skin of color. In one study, approximately 47% of dermatologists and dermatology residents reported that their medical training (medical school and/or residency) was inadequate in training them on skin conditions in Black patients. Furthermore, many who felt their training was lacking in skin of color identified the need for greater exposure to Black patients and training materials.15 The absence of comprehensive medical education regarding skin of color ultimately can be a disadvantage for both practitioners and patients, resulting in poorer outcomes. Furthermore, underrepresentation of skin of color may persist beyond undergraduate and graduate medical education. There also is evidence to suggest that noninclusion of skin of color pervades foundational dermatologic educational resources, including commonly used textbooks as well as continuing medical education disseminated at national conferences and meetings.17 Taken together, these findings highlight the need for more diverse and representative exposure to skin of color throughout medical training, which begins with a diverse inclusive undergraduate medical education in dermatology.

The objective of this study was to determine if the preclinical dermatology curriculum at 3 US medical schools provided adequate representation of skin of color patients in their didactic presentation slides.

Methods

Participants—Three US medical schools, a blend of private and public medical schools located across different geographic boundaries, agreed to participate in the study. All 3 institutions were current members of the American Medical Association (AMA) Accelerating Change in Medical Education consortium, whose primary goal is to create the medical school of the future and transform physician training.18 All 32 member institutions of the AMA consortium were contacted to request their participation in the study. As part of the consortium, these institutions have vowed to collectively work to develop and share the best models for educational advancement to improve care for patients, populations, and communities18 and would expectedly provide a more racially and ethnically inclusive curriculum than an institution not accountable to a group dedicated to identifying the best ways to deliver care for increasingly diverse communities.

Data Collection—Lectures were included if they were presented during dermatology preclinical courses in the 2015 to 2016 academic year. An uninvolved third party removed the names and identities of instructors to preserve anonymity. Two independent coders from different institutions extracted the data—lecture title, total number of clinical and histologic images, and number of skin of color images—from each of the anonymized lectures using a standardized coding form. We documented differences in skin of color noted in lectures and the disease context for the discussed differences, such as variations in clinical presentation, disease process, epidemiology/risk, and treatment between different skin phenotypes or ethnic groups. Photographs in which the coders were unable to differentiate whether the patient had skin of color were designated as indeterminate or unclear. Photographs appearing to represent Fitzpatrick skin types IV, V, and VI19 were categorically designated as skin of color, and those appearing to represent Fitzpatrick skin types I and II were described as not skin of color; however, images appearing to represent Fitzpatrick skin type III often were classified as not skin of color or indeterminate and occasionally skin of color. The Figure shows examples of images classified as skin of color, indeterminate, and not skin of color. Photographs often were classified as indeterminate due to poor lighting, close-up view photographs, or highlighted pathology obscuring the surrounding skin. We excluded duplicate photographs and histologic images from the analyses.

A–C, Examples of images classified as skin of color, indeterminate, and not skin of color, respectively

We also reviewed 19 conditions previously highlighted by the SOCS as areas of importance to skin of color patients.20 The coders tracked how many of these conditions were noted in each lecture. Duplicate discussion of these conditions was not included in the analyses. Any discrepancies between coders were resolved through additional slide review and discussion. The final coded data with the agreed upon changes were used for statistical analyses. Recent national demographic data from the US Census Bureau in 2019 describe approximately 39.9% of the population as belonging to racial/ethnic groups other than non-Hispanic/Latinx White.21 Consequently, the standard for adequate representation for skin of color photographs was set at 35% for the purpose of this study.

 

 

Results

Across all 3 institutions included in the study, the proportion of the total number of clinical photographs showing skin of color was 16% (290/1812). Eight percent of the total photographs (145/1812) were noted to be indeterminate (Table). For institution 1, 23.6% of photographs (155/658) showed skin of color, and 12.6% (83/658) were indeterminate. For institution 2, 13.1% (76/578) showed skin of color and 7.8% (45/578) were indeterminate. For institution 3, 10.2% (59/576) showed skin of color and 3% (17/576) were indeterminate.

Institutions 1, 2, and 3 had 18, 8, and 17 total dermatology lectures, respectively. Of the 19 conditions designated as areas of importance to skin of color patients by the SOCS, 16 (84.2%) were discussed by institution 1, 11 (57.9%) by institution 2, and 9 (47.4%) by institution 3 (eTable 1). Institution 3 did not include photographs of skin of color patients in its acne, psoriasis, or cutaneous malignancy lectures. Institution 1 also did not include any skin of color patients in its malignancy lecture. Lectures that focused on pigmentary disorders, atopic dermatitis, infectious conditions, and benign cutaneous neoplasms were more likely to display photographs of skin of color patients; for example, lectures that discussed infectious conditions, such as superficial mycoses, herpes viruses, human papillomavirus, syphilis, and atypical mycobacterial infections, were consistently among those with higher proportions of photographs of skin of color patients.

Throughout the entire preclinical dermatology course at all 3 institutions, of 2945 lecture slides, only 24 (0.8%) unique differences were noted between skin color and non–skin of color patients, with 10 total differences noted by institution 1, 6 by institution 2, and 8 by institution 3 (Table). The majority of these differences (19/24) were related to epidemiologic differences in prevalence among varying racial/ethnic groups, with only 5 instances highlighting differences in clinical presentation. There was only a single instance that elaborated on the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of the discussed difference. Of all 24 unique differences discussed, 8 were related to skin cancer, 3 were related to dermatitis, and 2 were related to the difference in manifestation of erythema in patients with darker skin (eTable 2).

 

Comment

The results of this study demonstrated that skin of color is underrepresented in the preclinical dermatology curriculum at these 3 institutions. Although only 16% of all included clinical photographs were of skin of color, individuals with skin of color will soon represent more than half of the total US population within the next 2 decades.1 To increase representation of skin of color patients, teaching faculty should consciously and deliberately include more photographs of skin of color patients for a wider variety of common conditions, including atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, in addition to those that tend to disparately affect skin of color patients, such as pseudofolliculitis barbae or melasma. Furthermore, they also can incorporate more detailed discussions about important differences seen in skin of color patients.

More Skin of Color Photographs in Psoriasis Lectures—At institution 3, there were no skin of color patients included in the psoriasis lecture, even though there is considerable data in the literature indicating notable differences in the clinical presentation, quality-of-life impact, and treatment of psoriasis in skin of color patients.11,22 There are multiple nuances in psoriasis manifestation in patients with skin of color, including less-conspicuous erythema in darker skin, higher degrees of dyspigmentation, and greater body surface area involvement. For Black patients with scalp psoriasis, the impact of hair texture, styling practices, and washing frequency are additional considerations that may impact disease severity and selection of topical therapy.11 The lack of inclusion of any skin of color patients in the psoriasis lecture at one institution further underscores the pressing need to prioritize communities of color in medical education.

 

 

More Skin of Color Photographs in Cutaneous Malignancy Lectures—Similarly, while a lecturer at institution 2 noted that acral lentiginous melanoma accounts for a considerable proportion of melanoma among skin of color patients,23 there was no mention of how melanoma generally is substantially more deadly in this population, potentially due to decreased awareness and inconsistent screening.24 Furthermore, at institutions 1 and 3, there were no photographs or discussion of skin of color patients during the cutaneous malignancy lectures. Evidence shows that more emphasis is needed for melanoma screening and awareness in skin of color populations to improve survival outcomes,24 and this begins with educating not only future dermatologists but all future physicians as well. The failure to include photographs of skin of color patients in discussions or lectures regarding cutaneous malignancies may serve to further perpetuate the harmful misperception that individuals with skin of color are unaffected by skin cancer.25,26

Analysis of Skin of Color Photographs in Infectious Disease Lectures—In addition, lectures discussing infectious etiologies were among those with the highest proportion of skin of color photographs. This relatively disproportionate representation of skin of color compared to the other lectures may contribute to the development of harmful stereotypes or the stigmatization of skin of color patients. Although skin of color should continue to be represented in similar lectures, teaching faculty should remain mindful of the potential unintended impact from lectures including relatively disproportionate amounts of skin of color, particularly when other lectures may have sparse to absent representation of skin of color.

More Photographs Available for Education—Overall, our findings may help to inform changes to preclinical dermatology medical education at other institutions to create more inclusive and representative curricula for skin of color patients. The ability of instructors to provide visual representation of various dermatologic conditions may be limited by the photographs available in certain textbooks with few examples of patients with skin of color; however, concerns regarding the lack of skin of color representation in dermatology training is not a novel discussion.17 Although it is the responsibility of all dermatologists to advocate for the inclusion of skin of color, many dermatologists of color have been leading the way in this movement for decades, publishing several textbooks to document various skin conditions in those with darker skin types and discuss unique considerations for patients with skin of color.27-29 Images from these textbooks can be utilized by programs to increase representation of skin of color in dermatology training. There also are multiple expanding online dermatologic databases, such as VisualDx, with an increasing focus on skin of color patients, some of which allow users to filter images by degree of skin pigmentation.30 Moreover, instructors also can work to diversify their curricula by highlighting more of the SOCS conditions of importance to skin of color patients, which have since been renamed and highlighted on the Patient Dermatology Education section of the SOCS website.20 These conditions, while not completely comprehensive, provide a useful starting point for medical educators to reevaluate for potential areas of improvement and inclusion.

There are several potential strategies that can be used to better represent skin of color in dermatologic preclinical medical education, including increasing awareness, especially among dermatology teaching faculty, of existing disparities in the representation of skin of color in the preclinical curricula. Additionally, all dermatology teaching materials could be reviewed at the department level prior to being disseminated to medical students to assess for instances in which skin of color could be prioritized for discussion or varying disease presentations in skin of color could be demonstrated. Finally, teaching faculty may consider photographing more clinical images of their skin of color patients to further develop a catalog of diverse images that can be used to teach students.

Study Limitations—Our study was unable to account for verbal discussion of skin of color not otherwise denoted or captured in lecture slides. Additional limitations include the utilization of Fitzpatrick skin types to describe and differentiate varying skin tones, as the Fitzpatrick scale originally was developed as a method to describe an individual’s response to UV exposure.19 The inability to further delineate the representation of darker skin types, such as those that may be classified as Fitzpatrick skin types V or VI,19 compared to those with lighter skin of color also was a limiting factor. This study was unable to assess for discussion of other common conditions affecting skin of color patients that were not listed as one of the priority conditions by SOCS. Photographs that were designated as indeterminate were difficult to elucidate as skin of color; however, it is possible that instructors may have verbally described these images as skin of color during lectures. Nonetheless, it may be beneficial for learners if teaching faculty were to clearly label instances where skin of color patients are shown or when notable differences are present.

 

 

Conclusion

Future studies would benefit from the inclusion of audio data from lectures, syllabi, and small group teaching materials from preclinical courses to more accurately assess representation of skin of color in dermatology training. Additionally, future studies also may expand to include images from lectures of overlapping clinical specialties, particularly infectious disease and rheumatology, to provide a broader assessment of skin of color exposure. Furthermore, repeat assessment may be beneficial to assess the longitudinal effectiveness of curricular changes at the institutions included in this study, comparing older lectures to more recent, updated lectures. This study also may be replicated at other medical schools to allow for wider comparison of curricula.

Acknowledgment—The authors wish to thank the institutions that offered and agreed to participate in this study with the hopes of improving medical education.

References
  1. Colby SL, Ortman JM. Projections of the size and composition of the US population: 2014 to 2060. United States Census Bureau website. Published March 2015. Accessed September 14, 2021. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2015/demo/p25-1143.pdf
  2. Learn more about SOCS. Skin of Color Society website. Accessed September 14, 2021. http://skinofcolorsociety.org/about-socs/
  3. Taylor SC. Skin of color: biology, structure, function, and implications for dermatologic disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46(suppl 2):S41-S62.
  4. Berardesca E, Maibach H. Ethnic skin: overview of structure and function. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(suppl 6):S139-S142.
  5. Callender VD, Surin-Lord SS, Davis EC, et al. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2011;12:87-99.
  6. Davis EC, Callender VD. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation: a review of the epidemiology, clinical features, and treatment options in skin of color. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010;3:20-31.
  7. Grimes PE, Stockton T. Pigmentary disorders in blacks. Dermatol Clin. 1988;6:271-281.
  8. Halder RM, Nootheti PK. Ethnic skin disorders overview. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(suppl 6):S143-S148.
  9. Alexis AF, Sergay AB, Taylor SC. Common dermatologic disorders in skin of color: a comparative practice survey. Cutis. 2007;80:387-394.
  10. Callender VD. Acne in ethnic skin: special considerations for therapy. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17:184-195.
  11. Alexis AF, Blackcloud P. Psoriasis in skin of color: epidemiology, genetics, clinical presentation, and treatment nuances. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2014;7:16-24.
  12. McCleskey PE, Gilson RT, DeVillez RL. Medical student core curriculum in dermatology survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61:30-35.
  13. Ramsay DL, Mayer F. National survey of undergraduate dermatologic medical education. Arch Dermatol.1985;121:1529-1530.
  14. Hansra NK, O’Sullivan P, Chen CL, et al. Medical school dermatology curriculum: are we adequately preparing primary care physicians? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61:23-29.
  15. Buster KJ, Stevens EI, Elmets CA. Dermatologic health disparities. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30:53-59, viii.
  16. Knable A, Hood AF, Pearson TG. Undergraduate medical education in dermatology: report from the AAD Interdisciplinary Education Committee, Subcommittee on Undergraduate Medical Education. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36:467-470.
  17. Ebede T, Papier A. Disparities in dermatology educational resources. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55:687-690.
  18. Skochelak SE, Stack SJ. Creating the medical schools of the future. Acad Med. 2017;92:16-19.
  19. Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:869-871.
  20. Skin of Color Society. Patient dermatology education. Accessed September 22, 2021. https://skinofcolorsociety.org/patient-dermatology-education
  21. QuickFacts: United States. US Census Bureau website. Updated July 1, 2019. Accessed September 14, 2021. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US#
  22. Kaufman BP, Alexis AF. Psoriasis in skin of color: insights into the epidemiology, clinical presentation, genetics, quality-of-life impact, and treatment of psoriasis in non-white racial/ethnic groups. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19:405-423.
  23. Bradford PT, Goldstein AM, McMaster ML, et al. Acral lentiginous melanoma: incidence and survival patterns in the United States, 1986-2005. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:427-434.
  24. Dawes SM, Tsai S, Gittleman H, et al. Racial disparities in melanoma survival. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75:983-991.
  25. Pipitone M, Robinson JK, Camara C, et al. Skin cancer awareness in suburban employees: a Hispanic perspective. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:118-123.
  26. Imahiyerobo-Ip J, Ip I, Jamal S, et al. Skin cancer awareness in communities of color. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64:198-200.
  27. Taylor SSC, Serrano AMA, Kelly AP, et al, eds. Taylor and Kelly’s Dermatology for Skin of Color. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2016.
  28. Dadzie OE, Petit A, Alexis AF, eds. Ethnic Dermatology: Principles and Practice. Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.
  29. Jackson-Richards D, Pandya AG, eds. Dermatology Atlas for Skin of Color. Springer; 2014.
  30. VisualDx. New VisualDx feature: skin of color sort. Published October 14, 2020. Accessed September 22, 2021. https://www.visualdx.com/blog/new-visualdx-feature-skin-of-color-sort/
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Okoro is from the Transitional Year Residency Program, Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, Georgia. Drs. Chau, Kawaoka, and Quereshi are from the Department of Dermatology, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. Dr. Wong is from the Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the US Government.

The eTables appear in the Appendix online at www.mdedge.com/dermatology.

Correspondence: Uzoamaka Okoro, MD, MSc, Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, 300 E Hospital Rd, Fort Gordon, GA 30905 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 108(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
204-e2
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Okoro is from the Transitional Year Residency Program, Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, Georgia. Drs. Chau, Kawaoka, and Quereshi are from the Department of Dermatology, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. Dr. Wong is from the Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the US Government.

The eTables appear in the Appendix online at www.mdedge.com/dermatology.

Correspondence: Uzoamaka Okoro, MD, MSc, Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, 300 E Hospital Rd, Fort Gordon, GA 30905 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Okoro is from the Transitional Year Residency Program, Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, Georgia. Drs. Chau, Kawaoka, and Quereshi are from the Department of Dermatology, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. Dr. Wong is from the Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the US Government.

The eTables appear in the Appendix online at www.mdedge.com/dermatology.

Correspondence: Uzoamaka Okoro, MD, MSc, Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, 300 E Hospital Rd, Fort Gordon, GA 30905 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society

A ccording to the US Census Bureau, more than half of all Americans are projected to belong to a minority group, defined as any group other than non-Hispanic White alone, by 2044. 1 Consequently, the United States rapidly is becoming a country in which the majority of citizens will have skin of color. Individuals with skin of color are of diverse ethnic backgrounds and include people of African, Latin American, Native American, Pacific Islander, and Asian descent, as well as interethnic backgrounds. 2 Throughout the country, dermatologists along with primary care practitioners may be confronted with certain cutaneous conditions that have varying disease presentations or processes in patients with skin of color. It also is important to note that racial categories are socially rather than biologically constructed, and the term skin of color includes a wide variety of diverse skin types. Nevertheless, the current literature thoroughly supports unique pathophysiologic differences in skin of color as well as variations in disease manifestation compared to White patients. 3-5 For example, the increased lability of melanosomes in skin of color patients, which increases their risk for postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, has been well documented. 5-7 There are various dermatologic conditions that also occur with higher frequency and manifest uniquely in people with darker, more pigmented skin, 7-9 and dermatologists, along with primary care physicians, should feel prepared to recognize and address them.

Extensive evidence also indicates that there are unique aspects to consider while managing certain skin diseases in patients with skin of color.8,10,11 Consequently, as noted on the Skin of Color Society (SOCS) website, “[a]n increase in the body of dermatological literature concerning skin of color as well as the advancement of both basic science and clinical investigational research is necessary to meet the needs of the expanding skin of color population.”2 In the meantime, current knowledge regarding cutaneous conditions that diversely or disproportionately affect skin of color should be actively disseminated to physicians in training. Although patients with skin of color should always have access to comprehensive care and knowledgeable practitioners, the current changes in national and regional demographics further underscore the need for a more thorough understanding of skin of color with regard to disease pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.

Several studies have found that medical students in the United States are minimally exposed to dermatology in general compared to other clinical specialties,12-14 which can easily lead to the underrecognition of disorders that may uniquely or disproportionately affect individuals with pigmented skin. Recent data showed that medical schools typically required fewer than 10 hours of dermatology instruction,12 and on average, dermatologic training made up less than 1% of a medical student’s undergraduate medical education.13,15,16 Consequently, less than 40% of primary care residents felt that their medical school curriculum adequately prepared them to manage common skin conditions.14 Although not all physicians should be expected to fully grasp the complexities of skin of color and its diagnostic and therapeutic implications, both practicing and training dermatologists have acknowledged a lack of exposure to skin of color. In one study, approximately 47% of dermatologists and dermatology residents reported that their medical training (medical school and/or residency) was inadequate in training them on skin conditions in Black patients. Furthermore, many who felt their training was lacking in skin of color identified the need for greater exposure to Black patients and training materials.15 The absence of comprehensive medical education regarding skin of color ultimately can be a disadvantage for both practitioners and patients, resulting in poorer outcomes. Furthermore, underrepresentation of skin of color may persist beyond undergraduate and graduate medical education. There also is evidence to suggest that noninclusion of skin of color pervades foundational dermatologic educational resources, including commonly used textbooks as well as continuing medical education disseminated at national conferences and meetings.17 Taken together, these findings highlight the need for more diverse and representative exposure to skin of color throughout medical training, which begins with a diverse inclusive undergraduate medical education in dermatology.

The objective of this study was to determine if the preclinical dermatology curriculum at 3 US medical schools provided adequate representation of skin of color patients in their didactic presentation slides.

Methods

Participants—Three US medical schools, a blend of private and public medical schools located across different geographic boundaries, agreed to participate in the study. All 3 institutions were current members of the American Medical Association (AMA) Accelerating Change in Medical Education consortium, whose primary goal is to create the medical school of the future and transform physician training.18 All 32 member institutions of the AMA consortium were contacted to request their participation in the study. As part of the consortium, these institutions have vowed to collectively work to develop and share the best models for educational advancement to improve care for patients, populations, and communities18 and would expectedly provide a more racially and ethnically inclusive curriculum than an institution not accountable to a group dedicated to identifying the best ways to deliver care for increasingly diverse communities.

Data Collection—Lectures were included if they were presented during dermatology preclinical courses in the 2015 to 2016 academic year. An uninvolved third party removed the names and identities of instructors to preserve anonymity. Two independent coders from different institutions extracted the data—lecture title, total number of clinical and histologic images, and number of skin of color images—from each of the anonymized lectures using a standardized coding form. We documented differences in skin of color noted in lectures and the disease context for the discussed differences, such as variations in clinical presentation, disease process, epidemiology/risk, and treatment between different skin phenotypes or ethnic groups. Photographs in which the coders were unable to differentiate whether the patient had skin of color were designated as indeterminate or unclear. Photographs appearing to represent Fitzpatrick skin types IV, V, and VI19 were categorically designated as skin of color, and those appearing to represent Fitzpatrick skin types I and II were described as not skin of color; however, images appearing to represent Fitzpatrick skin type III often were classified as not skin of color or indeterminate and occasionally skin of color. The Figure shows examples of images classified as skin of color, indeterminate, and not skin of color. Photographs often were classified as indeterminate due to poor lighting, close-up view photographs, or highlighted pathology obscuring the surrounding skin. We excluded duplicate photographs and histologic images from the analyses.

A–C, Examples of images classified as skin of color, indeterminate, and not skin of color, respectively

We also reviewed 19 conditions previously highlighted by the SOCS as areas of importance to skin of color patients.20 The coders tracked how many of these conditions were noted in each lecture. Duplicate discussion of these conditions was not included in the analyses. Any discrepancies between coders were resolved through additional slide review and discussion. The final coded data with the agreed upon changes were used for statistical analyses. Recent national demographic data from the US Census Bureau in 2019 describe approximately 39.9% of the population as belonging to racial/ethnic groups other than non-Hispanic/Latinx White.21 Consequently, the standard for adequate representation for skin of color photographs was set at 35% for the purpose of this study.

 

 

Results

Across all 3 institutions included in the study, the proportion of the total number of clinical photographs showing skin of color was 16% (290/1812). Eight percent of the total photographs (145/1812) were noted to be indeterminate (Table). For institution 1, 23.6% of photographs (155/658) showed skin of color, and 12.6% (83/658) were indeterminate. For institution 2, 13.1% (76/578) showed skin of color and 7.8% (45/578) were indeterminate. For institution 3, 10.2% (59/576) showed skin of color and 3% (17/576) were indeterminate.

Institutions 1, 2, and 3 had 18, 8, and 17 total dermatology lectures, respectively. Of the 19 conditions designated as areas of importance to skin of color patients by the SOCS, 16 (84.2%) were discussed by institution 1, 11 (57.9%) by institution 2, and 9 (47.4%) by institution 3 (eTable 1). Institution 3 did not include photographs of skin of color patients in its acne, psoriasis, or cutaneous malignancy lectures. Institution 1 also did not include any skin of color patients in its malignancy lecture. Lectures that focused on pigmentary disorders, atopic dermatitis, infectious conditions, and benign cutaneous neoplasms were more likely to display photographs of skin of color patients; for example, lectures that discussed infectious conditions, such as superficial mycoses, herpes viruses, human papillomavirus, syphilis, and atypical mycobacterial infections, were consistently among those with higher proportions of photographs of skin of color patients.

Throughout the entire preclinical dermatology course at all 3 institutions, of 2945 lecture slides, only 24 (0.8%) unique differences were noted between skin color and non–skin of color patients, with 10 total differences noted by institution 1, 6 by institution 2, and 8 by institution 3 (Table). The majority of these differences (19/24) were related to epidemiologic differences in prevalence among varying racial/ethnic groups, with only 5 instances highlighting differences in clinical presentation. There was only a single instance that elaborated on the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of the discussed difference. Of all 24 unique differences discussed, 8 were related to skin cancer, 3 were related to dermatitis, and 2 were related to the difference in manifestation of erythema in patients with darker skin (eTable 2).

 

Comment

The results of this study demonstrated that skin of color is underrepresented in the preclinical dermatology curriculum at these 3 institutions. Although only 16% of all included clinical photographs were of skin of color, individuals with skin of color will soon represent more than half of the total US population within the next 2 decades.1 To increase representation of skin of color patients, teaching faculty should consciously and deliberately include more photographs of skin of color patients for a wider variety of common conditions, including atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, in addition to those that tend to disparately affect skin of color patients, such as pseudofolliculitis barbae or melasma. Furthermore, they also can incorporate more detailed discussions about important differences seen in skin of color patients.

More Skin of Color Photographs in Psoriasis Lectures—At institution 3, there were no skin of color patients included in the psoriasis lecture, even though there is considerable data in the literature indicating notable differences in the clinical presentation, quality-of-life impact, and treatment of psoriasis in skin of color patients.11,22 There are multiple nuances in psoriasis manifestation in patients with skin of color, including less-conspicuous erythema in darker skin, higher degrees of dyspigmentation, and greater body surface area involvement. For Black patients with scalp psoriasis, the impact of hair texture, styling practices, and washing frequency are additional considerations that may impact disease severity and selection of topical therapy.11 The lack of inclusion of any skin of color patients in the psoriasis lecture at one institution further underscores the pressing need to prioritize communities of color in medical education.

 

 

More Skin of Color Photographs in Cutaneous Malignancy Lectures—Similarly, while a lecturer at institution 2 noted that acral lentiginous melanoma accounts for a considerable proportion of melanoma among skin of color patients,23 there was no mention of how melanoma generally is substantially more deadly in this population, potentially due to decreased awareness and inconsistent screening.24 Furthermore, at institutions 1 and 3, there were no photographs or discussion of skin of color patients during the cutaneous malignancy lectures. Evidence shows that more emphasis is needed for melanoma screening and awareness in skin of color populations to improve survival outcomes,24 and this begins with educating not only future dermatologists but all future physicians as well. The failure to include photographs of skin of color patients in discussions or lectures regarding cutaneous malignancies may serve to further perpetuate the harmful misperception that individuals with skin of color are unaffected by skin cancer.25,26

Analysis of Skin of Color Photographs in Infectious Disease Lectures—In addition, lectures discussing infectious etiologies were among those with the highest proportion of skin of color photographs. This relatively disproportionate representation of skin of color compared to the other lectures may contribute to the development of harmful stereotypes or the stigmatization of skin of color patients. Although skin of color should continue to be represented in similar lectures, teaching faculty should remain mindful of the potential unintended impact from lectures including relatively disproportionate amounts of skin of color, particularly when other lectures may have sparse to absent representation of skin of color.

More Photographs Available for Education—Overall, our findings may help to inform changes to preclinical dermatology medical education at other institutions to create more inclusive and representative curricula for skin of color patients. The ability of instructors to provide visual representation of various dermatologic conditions may be limited by the photographs available in certain textbooks with few examples of patients with skin of color; however, concerns regarding the lack of skin of color representation in dermatology training is not a novel discussion.17 Although it is the responsibility of all dermatologists to advocate for the inclusion of skin of color, many dermatologists of color have been leading the way in this movement for decades, publishing several textbooks to document various skin conditions in those with darker skin types and discuss unique considerations for patients with skin of color.27-29 Images from these textbooks can be utilized by programs to increase representation of skin of color in dermatology training. There also are multiple expanding online dermatologic databases, such as VisualDx, with an increasing focus on skin of color patients, some of which allow users to filter images by degree of skin pigmentation.30 Moreover, instructors also can work to diversify their curricula by highlighting more of the SOCS conditions of importance to skin of color patients, which have since been renamed and highlighted on the Patient Dermatology Education section of the SOCS website.20 These conditions, while not completely comprehensive, provide a useful starting point for medical educators to reevaluate for potential areas of improvement and inclusion.

There are several potential strategies that can be used to better represent skin of color in dermatologic preclinical medical education, including increasing awareness, especially among dermatology teaching faculty, of existing disparities in the representation of skin of color in the preclinical curricula. Additionally, all dermatology teaching materials could be reviewed at the department level prior to being disseminated to medical students to assess for instances in which skin of color could be prioritized for discussion or varying disease presentations in skin of color could be demonstrated. Finally, teaching faculty may consider photographing more clinical images of their skin of color patients to further develop a catalog of diverse images that can be used to teach students.

Study Limitations—Our study was unable to account for verbal discussion of skin of color not otherwise denoted or captured in lecture slides. Additional limitations include the utilization of Fitzpatrick skin types to describe and differentiate varying skin tones, as the Fitzpatrick scale originally was developed as a method to describe an individual’s response to UV exposure.19 The inability to further delineate the representation of darker skin types, such as those that may be classified as Fitzpatrick skin types V or VI,19 compared to those with lighter skin of color also was a limiting factor. This study was unable to assess for discussion of other common conditions affecting skin of color patients that were not listed as one of the priority conditions by SOCS. Photographs that were designated as indeterminate were difficult to elucidate as skin of color; however, it is possible that instructors may have verbally described these images as skin of color during lectures. Nonetheless, it may be beneficial for learners if teaching faculty were to clearly label instances where skin of color patients are shown or when notable differences are present.

 

 

Conclusion

Future studies would benefit from the inclusion of audio data from lectures, syllabi, and small group teaching materials from preclinical courses to more accurately assess representation of skin of color in dermatology training. Additionally, future studies also may expand to include images from lectures of overlapping clinical specialties, particularly infectious disease and rheumatology, to provide a broader assessment of skin of color exposure. Furthermore, repeat assessment may be beneficial to assess the longitudinal effectiveness of curricular changes at the institutions included in this study, comparing older lectures to more recent, updated lectures. This study also may be replicated at other medical schools to allow for wider comparison of curricula.

Acknowledgment—The authors wish to thank the institutions that offered and agreed to participate in this study with the hopes of improving medical education.

A ccording to the US Census Bureau, more than half of all Americans are projected to belong to a minority group, defined as any group other than non-Hispanic White alone, by 2044. 1 Consequently, the United States rapidly is becoming a country in which the majority of citizens will have skin of color. Individuals with skin of color are of diverse ethnic backgrounds and include people of African, Latin American, Native American, Pacific Islander, and Asian descent, as well as interethnic backgrounds. 2 Throughout the country, dermatologists along with primary care practitioners may be confronted with certain cutaneous conditions that have varying disease presentations or processes in patients with skin of color. It also is important to note that racial categories are socially rather than biologically constructed, and the term skin of color includes a wide variety of diverse skin types. Nevertheless, the current literature thoroughly supports unique pathophysiologic differences in skin of color as well as variations in disease manifestation compared to White patients. 3-5 For example, the increased lability of melanosomes in skin of color patients, which increases their risk for postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, has been well documented. 5-7 There are various dermatologic conditions that also occur with higher frequency and manifest uniquely in people with darker, more pigmented skin, 7-9 and dermatologists, along with primary care physicians, should feel prepared to recognize and address them.

Extensive evidence also indicates that there are unique aspects to consider while managing certain skin diseases in patients with skin of color.8,10,11 Consequently, as noted on the Skin of Color Society (SOCS) website, “[a]n increase in the body of dermatological literature concerning skin of color as well as the advancement of both basic science and clinical investigational research is necessary to meet the needs of the expanding skin of color population.”2 In the meantime, current knowledge regarding cutaneous conditions that diversely or disproportionately affect skin of color should be actively disseminated to physicians in training. Although patients with skin of color should always have access to comprehensive care and knowledgeable practitioners, the current changes in national and regional demographics further underscore the need for a more thorough understanding of skin of color with regard to disease pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.

Several studies have found that medical students in the United States are minimally exposed to dermatology in general compared to other clinical specialties,12-14 which can easily lead to the underrecognition of disorders that may uniquely or disproportionately affect individuals with pigmented skin. Recent data showed that medical schools typically required fewer than 10 hours of dermatology instruction,12 and on average, dermatologic training made up less than 1% of a medical student’s undergraduate medical education.13,15,16 Consequently, less than 40% of primary care residents felt that their medical school curriculum adequately prepared them to manage common skin conditions.14 Although not all physicians should be expected to fully grasp the complexities of skin of color and its diagnostic and therapeutic implications, both practicing and training dermatologists have acknowledged a lack of exposure to skin of color. In one study, approximately 47% of dermatologists and dermatology residents reported that their medical training (medical school and/or residency) was inadequate in training them on skin conditions in Black patients. Furthermore, many who felt their training was lacking in skin of color identified the need for greater exposure to Black patients and training materials.15 The absence of comprehensive medical education regarding skin of color ultimately can be a disadvantage for both practitioners and patients, resulting in poorer outcomes. Furthermore, underrepresentation of skin of color may persist beyond undergraduate and graduate medical education. There also is evidence to suggest that noninclusion of skin of color pervades foundational dermatologic educational resources, including commonly used textbooks as well as continuing medical education disseminated at national conferences and meetings.17 Taken together, these findings highlight the need for more diverse and representative exposure to skin of color throughout medical training, which begins with a diverse inclusive undergraduate medical education in dermatology.

The objective of this study was to determine if the preclinical dermatology curriculum at 3 US medical schools provided adequate representation of skin of color patients in their didactic presentation slides.

Methods

Participants—Three US medical schools, a blend of private and public medical schools located across different geographic boundaries, agreed to participate in the study. All 3 institutions were current members of the American Medical Association (AMA) Accelerating Change in Medical Education consortium, whose primary goal is to create the medical school of the future and transform physician training.18 All 32 member institutions of the AMA consortium were contacted to request their participation in the study. As part of the consortium, these institutions have vowed to collectively work to develop and share the best models for educational advancement to improve care for patients, populations, and communities18 and would expectedly provide a more racially and ethnically inclusive curriculum than an institution not accountable to a group dedicated to identifying the best ways to deliver care for increasingly diverse communities.

Data Collection—Lectures were included if they were presented during dermatology preclinical courses in the 2015 to 2016 academic year. An uninvolved third party removed the names and identities of instructors to preserve anonymity. Two independent coders from different institutions extracted the data—lecture title, total number of clinical and histologic images, and number of skin of color images—from each of the anonymized lectures using a standardized coding form. We documented differences in skin of color noted in lectures and the disease context for the discussed differences, such as variations in clinical presentation, disease process, epidemiology/risk, and treatment between different skin phenotypes or ethnic groups. Photographs in which the coders were unable to differentiate whether the patient had skin of color were designated as indeterminate or unclear. Photographs appearing to represent Fitzpatrick skin types IV, V, and VI19 were categorically designated as skin of color, and those appearing to represent Fitzpatrick skin types I and II were described as not skin of color; however, images appearing to represent Fitzpatrick skin type III often were classified as not skin of color or indeterminate and occasionally skin of color. The Figure shows examples of images classified as skin of color, indeterminate, and not skin of color. Photographs often were classified as indeterminate due to poor lighting, close-up view photographs, or highlighted pathology obscuring the surrounding skin. We excluded duplicate photographs and histologic images from the analyses.

A–C, Examples of images classified as skin of color, indeterminate, and not skin of color, respectively

We also reviewed 19 conditions previously highlighted by the SOCS as areas of importance to skin of color patients.20 The coders tracked how many of these conditions were noted in each lecture. Duplicate discussion of these conditions was not included in the analyses. Any discrepancies between coders were resolved through additional slide review and discussion. The final coded data with the agreed upon changes were used for statistical analyses. Recent national demographic data from the US Census Bureau in 2019 describe approximately 39.9% of the population as belonging to racial/ethnic groups other than non-Hispanic/Latinx White.21 Consequently, the standard for adequate representation for skin of color photographs was set at 35% for the purpose of this study.

 

 

Results

Across all 3 institutions included in the study, the proportion of the total number of clinical photographs showing skin of color was 16% (290/1812). Eight percent of the total photographs (145/1812) were noted to be indeterminate (Table). For institution 1, 23.6% of photographs (155/658) showed skin of color, and 12.6% (83/658) were indeterminate. For institution 2, 13.1% (76/578) showed skin of color and 7.8% (45/578) were indeterminate. For institution 3, 10.2% (59/576) showed skin of color and 3% (17/576) were indeterminate.

Institutions 1, 2, and 3 had 18, 8, and 17 total dermatology lectures, respectively. Of the 19 conditions designated as areas of importance to skin of color patients by the SOCS, 16 (84.2%) were discussed by institution 1, 11 (57.9%) by institution 2, and 9 (47.4%) by institution 3 (eTable 1). Institution 3 did not include photographs of skin of color patients in its acne, psoriasis, or cutaneous malignancy lectures. Institution 1 also did not include any skin of color patients in its malignancy lecture. Lectures that focused on pigmentary disorders, atopic dermatitis, infectious conditions, and benign cutaneous neoplasms were more likely to display photographs of skin of color patients; for example, lectures that discussed infectious conditions, such as superficial mycoses, herpes viruses, human papillomavirus, syphilis, and atypical mycobacterial infections, were consistently among those with higher proportions of photographs of skin of color patients.

Throughout the entire preclinical dermatology course at all 3 institutions, of 2945 lecture slides, only 24 (0.8%) unique differences were noted between skin color and non–skin of color patients, with 10 total differences noted by institution 1, 6 by institution 2, and 8 by institution 3 (Table). The majority of these differences (19/24) were related to epidemiologic differences in prevalence among varying racial/ethnic groups, with only 5 instances highlighting differences in clinical presentation. There was only a single instance that elaborated on the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of the discussed difference. Of all 24 unique differences discussed, 8 were related to skin cancer, 3 were related to dermatitis, and 2 were related to the difference in manifestation of erythema in patients with darker skin (eTable 2).

 

Comment

The results of this study demonstrated that skin of color is underrepresented in the preclinical dermatology curriculum at these 3 institutions. Although only 16% of all included clinical photographs were of skin of color, individuals with skin of color will soon represent more than half of the total US population within the next 2 decades.1 To increase representation of skin of color patients, teaching faculty should consciously and deliberately include more photographs of skin of color patients for a wider variety of common conditions, including atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, in addition to those that tend to disparately affect skin of color patients, such as pseudofolliculitis barbae or melasma. Furthermore, they also can incorporate more detailed discussions about important differences seen in skin of color patients.

More Skin of Color Photographs in Psoriasis Lectures—At institution 3, there were no skin of color patients included in the psoriasis lecture, even though there is considerable data in the literature indicating notable differences in the clinical presentation, quality-of-life impact, and treatment of psoriasis in skin of color patients.11,22 There are multiple nuances in psoriasis manifestation in patients with skin of color, including less-conspicuous erythema in darker skin, higher degrees of dyspigmentation, and greater body surface area involvement. For Black patients with scalp psoriasis, the impact of hair texture, styling practices, and washing frequency are additional considerations that may impact disease severity and selection of topical therapy.11 The lack of inclusion of any skin of color patients in the psoriasis lecture at one institution further underscores the pressing need to prioritize communities of color in medical education.

 

 

More Skin of Color Photographs in Cutaneous Malignancy Lectures—Similarly, while a lecturer at institution 2 noted that acral lentiginous melanoma accounts for a considerable proportion of melanoma among skin of color patients,23 there was no mention of how melanoma generally is substantially more deadly in this population, potentially due to decreased awareness and inconsistent screening.24 Furthermore, at institutions 1 and 3, there were no photographs or discussion of skin of color patients during the cutaneous malignancy lectures. Evidence shows that more emphasis is needed for melanoma screening and awareness in skin of color populations to improve survival outcomes,24 and this begins with educating not only future dermatologists but all future physicians as well. The failure to include photographs of skin of color patients in discussions or lectures regarding cutaneous malignancies may serve to further perpetuate the harmful misperception that individuals with skin of color are unaffected by skin cancer.25,26

Analysis of Skin of Color Photographs in Infectious Disease Lectures—In addition, lectures discussing infectious etiologies were among those with the highest proportion of skin of color photographs. This relatively disproportionate representation of skin of color compared to the other lectures may contribute to the development of harmful stereotypes or the stigmatization of skin of color patients. Although skin of color should continue to be represented in similar lectures, teaching faculty should remain mindful of the potential unintended impact from lectures including relatively disproportionate amounts of skin of color, particularly when other lectures may have sparse to absent representation of skin of color.

More Photographs Available for Education—Overall, our findings may help to inform changes to preclinical dermatology medical education at other institutions to create more inclusive and representative curricula for skin of color patients. The ability of instructors to provide visual representation of various dermatologic conditions may be limited by the photographs available in certain textbooks with few examples of patients with skin of color; however, concerns regarding the lack of skin of color representation in dermatology training is not a novel discussion.17 Although it is the responsibility of all dermatologists to advocate for the inclusion of skin of color, many dermatologists of color have been leading the way in this movement for decades, publishing several textbooks to document various skin conditions in those with darker skin types and discuss unique considerations for patients with skin of color.27-29 Images from these textbooks can be utilized by programs to increase representation of skin of color in dermatology training. There also are multiple expanding online dermatologic databases, such as VisualDx, with an increasing focus on skin of color patients, some of which allow users to filter images by degree of skin pigmentation.30 Moreover, instructors also can work to diversify their curricula by highlighting more of the SOCS conditions of importance to skin of color patients, which have since been renamed and highlighted on the Patient Dermatology Education section of the SOCS website.20 These conditions, while not completely comprehensive, provide a useful starting point for medical educators to reevaluate for potential areas of improvement and inclusion.

There are several potential strategies that can be used to better represent skin of color in dermatologic preclinical medical education, including increasing awareness, especially among dermatology teaching faculty, of existing disparities in the representation of skin of color in the preclinical curricula. Additionally, all dermatology teaching materials could be reviewed at the department level prior to being disseminated to medical students to assess for instances in which skin of color could be prioritized for discussion or varying disease presentations in skin of color could be demonstrated. Finally, teaching faculty may consider photographing more clinical images of their skin of color patients to further develop a catalog of diverse images that can be used to teach students.

Study Limitations—Our study was unable to account for verbal discussion of skin of color not otherwise denoted or captured in lecture slides. Additional limitations include the utilization of Fitzpatrick skin types to describe and differentiate varying skin tones, as the Fitzpatrick scale originally was developed as a method to describe an individual’s response to UV exposure.19 The inability to further delineate the representation of darker skin types, such as those that may be classified as Fitzpatrick skin types V or VI,19 compared to those with lighter skin of color also was a limiting factor. This study was unable to assess for discussion of other common conditions affecting skin of color patients that were not listed as one of the priority conditions by SOCS. Photographs that were designated as indeterminate were difficult to elucidate as skin of color; however, it is possible that instructors may have verbally described these images as skin of color during lectures. Nonetheless, it may be beneficial for learners if teaching faculty were to clearly label instances where skin of color patients are shown or when notable differences are present.

 

 

Conclusion

Future studies would benefit from the inclusion of audio data from lectures, syllabi, and small group teaching materials from preclinical courses to more accurately assess representation of skin of color in dermatology training. Additionally, future studies also may expand to include images from lectures of overlapping clinical specialties, particularly infectious disease and rheumatology, to provide a broader assessment of skin of color exposure. Furthermore, repeat assessment may be beneficial to assess the longitudinal effectiveness of curricular changes at the institutions included in this study, comparing older lectures to more recent, updated lectures. This study also may be replicated at other medical schools to allow for wider comparison of curricula.

Acknowledgment—The authors wish to thank the institutions that offered and agreed to participate in this study with the hopes of improving medical education.

References
  1. Colby SL, Ortman JM. Projections of the size and composition of the US population: 2014 to 2060. United States Census Bureau website. Published March 2015. Accessed September 14, 2021. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2015/demo/p25-1143.pdf
  2. Learn more about SOCS. Skin of Color Society website. Accessed September 14, 2021. http://skinofcolorsociety.org/about-socs/
  3. Taylor SC. Skin of color: biology, structure, function, and implications for dermatologic disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46(suppl 2):S41-S62.
  4. Berardesca E, Maibach H. Ethnic skin: overview of structure and function. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(suppl 6):S139-S142.
  5. Callender VD, Surin-Lord SS, Davis EC, et al. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2011;12:87-99.
  6. Davis EC, Callender VD. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation: a review of the epidemiology, clinical features, and treatment options in skin of color. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010;3:20-31.
  7. Grimes PE, Stockton T. Pigmentary disorders in blacks. Dermatol Clin. 1988;6:271-281.
  8. Halder RM, Nootheti PK. Ethnic skin disorders overview. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(suppl 6):S143-S148.
  9. Alexis AF, Sergay AB, Taylor SC. Common dermatologic disorders in skin of color: a comparative practice survey. Cutis. 2007;80:387-394.
  10. Callender VD. Acne in ethnic skin: special considerations for therapy. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17:184-195.
  11. Alexis AF, Blackcloud P. Psoriasis in skin of color: epidemiology, genetics, clinical presentation, and treatment nuances. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2014;7:16-24.
  12. McCleskey PE, Gilson RT, DeVillez RL. Medical student core curriculum in dermatology survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61:30-35.
  13. Ramsay DL, Mayer F. National survey of undergraduate dermatologic medical education. Arch Dermatol.1985;121:1529-1530.
  14. Hansra NK, O’Sullivan P, Chen CL, et al. Medical school dermatology curriculum: are we adequately preparing primary care physicians? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61:23-29.
  15. Buster KJ, Stevens EI, Elmets CA. Dermatologic health disparities. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30:53-59, viii.
  16. Knable A, Hood AF, Pearson TG. Undergraduate medical education in dermatology: report from the AAD Interdisciplinary Education Committee, Subcommittee on Undergraduate Medical Education. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36:467-470.
  17. Ebede T, Papier A. Disparities in dermatology educational resources. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55:687-690.
  18. Skochelak SE, Stack SJ. Creating the medical schools of the future. Acad Med. 2017;92:16-19.
  19. Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:869-871.
  20. Skin of Color Society. Patient dermatology education. Accessed September 22, 2021. https://skinofcolorsociety.org/patient-dermatology-education
  21. QuickFacts: United States. US Census Bureau website. Updated July 1, 2019. Accessed September 14, 2021. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US#
  22. Kaufman BP, Alexis AF. Psoriasis in skin of color: insights into the epidemiology, clinical presentation, genetics, quality-of-life impact, and treatment of psoriasis in non-white racial/ethnic groups. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19:405-423.
  23. Bradford PT, Goldstein AM, McMaster ML, et al. Acral lentiginous melanoma: incidence and survival patterns in the United States, 1986-2005. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:427-434.
  24. Dawes SM, Tsai S, Gittleman H, et al. Racial disparities in melanoma survival. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75:983-991.
  25. Pipitone M, Robinson JK, Camara C, et al. Skin cancer awareness in suburban employees: a Hispanic perspective. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:118-123.
  26. Imahiyerobo-Ip J, Ip I, Jamal S, et al. Skin cancer awareness in communities of color. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64:198-200.
  27. Taylor SSC, Serrano AMA, Kelly AP, et al, eds. Taylor and Kelly’s Dermatology for Skin of Color. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2016.
  28. Dadzie OE, Petit A, Alexis AF, eds. Ethnic Dermatology: Principles and Practice. Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.
  29. Jackson-Richards D, Pandya AG, eds. Dermatology Atlas for Skin of Color. Springer; 2014.
  30. VisualDx. New VisualDx feature: skin of color sort. Published October 14, 2020. Accessed September 22, 2021. https://www.visualdx.com/blog/new-visualdx-feature-skin-of-color-sort/
References
  1. Colby SL, Ortman JM. Projections of the size and composition of the US population: 2014 to 2060. United States Census Bureau website. Published March 2015. Accessed September 14, 2021. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2015/demo/p25-1143.pdf
  2. Learn more about SOCS. Skin of Color Society website. Accessed September 14, 2021. http://skinofcolorsociety.org/about-socs/
  3. Taylor SC. Skin of color: biology, structure, function, and implications for dermatologic disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46(suppl 2):S41-S62.
  4. Berardesca E, Maibach H. Ethnic skin: overview of structure and function. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(suppl 6):S139-S142.
  5. Callender VD, Surin-Lord SS, Davis EC, et al. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2011;12:87-99.
  6. Davis EC, Callender VD. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation: a review of the epidemiology, clinical features, and treatment options in skin of color. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010;3:20-31.
  7. Grimes PE, Stockton T. Pigmentary disorders in blacks. Dermatol Clin. 1988;6:271-281.
  8. Halder RM, Nootheti PK. Ethnic skin disorders overview. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(suppl 6):S143-S148.
  9. Alexis AF, Sergay AB, Taylor SC. Common dermatologic disorders in skin of color: a comparative practice survey. Cutis. 2007;80:387-394.
  10. Callender VD. Acne in ethnic skin: special considerations for therapy. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17:184-195.
  11. Alexis AF, Blackcloud P. Psoriasis in skin of color: epidemiology, genetics, clinical presentation, and treatment nuances. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2014;7:16-24.
  12. McCleskey PE, Gilson RT, DeVillez RL. Medical student core curriculum in dermatology survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61:30-35.
  13. Ramsay DL, Mayer F. National survey of undergraduate dermatologic medical education. Arch Dermatol.1985;121:1529-1530.
  14. Hansra NK, O’Sullivan P, Chen CL, et al. Medical school dermatology curriculum: are we adequately preparing primary care physicians? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61:23-29.
  15. Buster KJ, Stevens EI, Elmets CA. Dermatologic health disparities. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30:53-59, viii.
  16. Knable A, Hood AF, Pearson TG. Undergraduate medical education in dermatology: report from the AAD Interdisciplinary Education Committee, Subcommittee on Undergraduate Medical Education. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36:467-470.
  17. Ebede T, Papier A. Disparities in dermatology educational resources. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55:687-690.
  18. Skochelak SE, Stack SJ. Creating the medical schools of the future. Acad Med. 2017;92:16-19.
  19. Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:869-871.
  20. Skin of Color Society. Patient dermatology education. Accessed September 22, 2021. https://skinofcolorsociety.org/patient-dermatology-education
  21. QuickFacts: United States. US Census Bureau website. Updated July 1, 2019. Accessed September 14, 2021. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US#
  22. Kaufman BP, Alexis AF. Psoriasis in skin of color: insights into the epidemiology, clinical presentation, genetics, quality-of-life impact, and treatment of psoriasis in non-white racial/ethnic groups. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19:405-423.
  23. Bradford PT, Goldstein AM, McMaster ML, et al. Acral lentiginous melanoma: incidence and survival patterns in the United States, 1986-2005. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:427-434.
  24. Dawes SM, Tsai S, Gittleman H, et al. Racial disparities in melanoma survival. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75:983-991.
  25. Pipitone M, Robinson JK, Camara C, et al. Skin cancer awareness in suburban employees: a Hispanic perspective. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:118-123.
  26. Imahiyerobo-Ip J, Ip I, Jamal S, et al. Skin cancer awareness in communities of color. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64:198-200.
  27. Taylor SSC, Serrano AMA, Kelly AP, et al, eds. Taylor and Kelly’s Dermatology for Skin of Color. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2016.
  28. Dadzie OE, Petit A, Alexis AF, eds. Ethnic Dermatology: Principles and Practice. Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.
  29. Jackson-Richards D, Pandya AG, eds. Dermatology Atlas for Skin of Color. Springer; 2014.
  30. VisualDx. New VisualDx feature: skin of color sort. Published October 14, 2020. Accessed September 22, 2021. https://www.visualdx.com/blog/new-visualdx-feature-skin-of-color-sort/
Issue
Cutis - 108(4)
Issue
Cutis - 108(4)
Page Number
204-e2
Page Number
204-e2
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Skin of Color in Preclinical Medical Education: A Cross-Institutional Comparison and A Call to Action
Display Headline
Skin of Color in Preclinical Medical Education: A Cross-Institutional Comparison and A Call to Action
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • The United States rapidly is becoming a country in which the majority of citizens will have skin of color.
  • Our study results strongly suggest that skin of color may be seriously underrepresented in medical education and can guide modifications to preclinical dermatology medical education to develop a more comprehensive and inclusive curriculum.
  • Efforts should be made to increase images and discussion of skin of color in preclinical didactics.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media

Counseling About Traction Alopecia: A "Compliment, Discuss, and Suggest" Method

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 07/19/2021 - 09:53
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society


Traction alopecia (TA)--one of the most common types of hair loss in Black women (although not exclusive to Black women)--is reversible when early corrective measures are taken; if chronic tension continues, however, permanent scarring alopecia ensues. Dermatologists can prevent worsening of this distressing hair loss. Due to a dearth of training among dermatologists in conditions occurring in patients with tightly coiled hair, it is imperative to add practical methods to the body of dermatology literature, with the goal of enhancing cultural humility.  

Hairstyling among Black women often is a lengthy process and often results in relationship bonding with the hair care giver, in turn imparting hair care traditions to the next generation. Therefore, a well-received discussion about TA prevention not only has an impact on the patient but potentially on a multigenerational family of women and friends. We present a memory aid for discussing TA, with a focus on cultural humility and patient-centered communication. 

Factors contributing to the risk of TA are hairstyles and hair care practices commonly used in Black individuals, including braids, locs, weaves, wigs, and chemical straightening.1 These styles often are worn to increase hair manageability or as a creative expression of beauty. 

Discussing TA can be distressing for physicians and patients, especially in the setting of hair texture discordance. In a study that surveyed Black patients' perception of their dermatologic care both in and outside of a skin of color clinic, 71% of respondents (12/17) said that they prefer a race-concordant dermatologist. Some respondents reported that non-skin of color clinic dermatologists examined their hair with the end of a pencil or not at all; patients interpreted these interactions as disrespectful and racially insensitive.2 Another study found that only 30.2% (19/63) of dermatology chief residents and 12.2% (5/41) of program directors reported a specific rotation during which residents gained experience treating skin of color patients.3 

Due to a paucity of training in diagnosing and treating patients with tightly coiled hair who experience hair loss, some physicians might feel uncomfortable caring for patients who have tightly coiled hair. Although many Black patients prefer to see a race-concordant dermatologist because of their perceived cultural competence and shared experience, there is a paucity of Black dermatologists to see all patients who have tightly coiled hair.4 Therefore, all dermatologists should become skilled and comfortable discussing and treating TA in patients with all hair types. 

METHOD FOR COUNSELING 

The following scenarios are a guide to begin closing the competency gap in counseling about TA, using a "compliment, discuss, and suggest" method.  

Scenario 1 
A Black woman presents with a concern of "thinning edges" (a popular term on social media for TA). A hair-discordant dermatologist tells her, first, that she has TA caused by wearing tight hairstyles and, second, that the treatment is to stop wearing tight braids and weaves and to discontinue chemical relaxers. The dermatologist then leaves the room.  

The Patient's Perspective
It is not uncommon for the patient to have feelings of frustration about how they will style their hair, especially if they are unfamiliar with caring for their hair in its natural state.5 Also, they might have feelings of dismay that the loving childhood hair care giver, often their mother or grandmother, unintentionally harmed them with a tight style. They also might feel betrayed by their hairstylist, who might not have encouraged them to see a dermatologist, or who continued to oblige their request for a high-risk hairstyle. The patient might feel uncomfortable communicating the dermatologist's new recommendations to their hair care team, who also are part of her emotional support system. The patient also might think that the hair-discordant dermatologist has no idea what they "go through" with their hair.  

"Compliment, Discuss, and Suggest" Counseling
Traction alopecia is caused by tight hairstyles that often hurt when they are put in as tight braids, weaves, and ponytails.6 Risk increases if tight styles are applied to chemically straightened hair.1 Braids, sew-in weaves, and wigs with adhesive sometimes are referred to as protective styles. However, these styles can still lead to TA due to excessive tension.  

  • Compliment: "Your hair looks great. I know that you get many compliments."  
  • Discuss: "However, some of the styles might be increasing your risk for hair loss. Our goal is to preserve as many of your follicles as possible."  
  • Suggest: "Let's start by loosening the hairstyle if it is painful when being applied. Pain means inflammation, which can lead to scarring of hair follicles and worsening of hair loss." 

Using pronouns such as we, us, and our is intentional. Doing so signals that the dermatologist is a partner with the patient in the treatment of TA. Starting with a simple initial recommendation gives the patient time to process the common thoughts highlighted in The Patient's Perspective section.6  

Scenario 2 
A Black child (we'll call her "Janet") is accompanied by her mother for follow-up of mild atopic dermatitis on the body and scalp. When the dermatologist examines the patient's scalp, they note that she has the fringe sign--retained short hairs along the frontal hairline--that is consistent with TA. Janet's hair is adorned with 2 tight ponytails in the front with colorful decorative balls on ponytail ties, barrettes, and 6 cornrow braids in the back with plastic beads on the ends. The dermatologist counsels about the atopic dermatitis and leaves the room.  

"Compliment, Discuss, and Suggest" Counseling
The use of tight decorative balls on ponytail ties and numerous plastic beads increases the amount of tension and weight on the hair, which may lead to a higher risk for developing traction alopecia.6 It is quite common for children of African descent to wear hair adornments. Proper counseling regarding their use and possible implications is essential. 

  1. Compliment: "You're doing a great job controlling the atopic dermatitis, which can cause Janet's scalp to be dry. Also, her hair is beautiful--it looks like you spent a lot of time on her hair. And Janet, I like the color of your barrettes." 
  2. Discuss: "Mom, I just noticed that a few areas look tight. Let's look together." (The dermatologist points out areas where the scalp is tented upward due to traction, follicular pustules or papules, or the frontal fringe sign.) "I'm on a mission to #savetheedges because we want Janet to grow up with full edges." (Again, loss of "edges" refers to TA.) 
  3. Suggest: "When you do Janet's hair, it's OK if every hair is not in place. In fact, making styles look and feel 1 or 2 weeks old will lessen tension on the scalp. Remove Janet's hair ties to release tension when she is at home and while she's sleeping, if possible. Every minute that the hair is loose really does help."6  

The Parent's Perspective

All parents take pride in their children. In some Black communities, mothers are judged by how well they manage and style their children's hair. Some people might even suggest that parents of children with nonstyled, tightly coiled hair are not fit parents. Anthropologist Sylvia Boone, PhD, found that among the Mende tribe in Sierra Leone, "unkempt, 'neglected,' or 'messy' hair implied that a woman either had loose morals or was insane."7 

Braids are commonly worn by people of African heritage for a variety of reasons, including ease of manageability, to decrease daily hairstyling time, and as an expression of creativity. Intricate neat hairstyles, despite the risk of pain and TA, are perceived as a sign that the child is cared for and loved.6  

FINAL THOUGHTS 

Patient-centered communication is associated with the patient trusting the physician, which is especially important in race-discordant physician-patient relationships. A study found that patient-physician race discordance led to shorter visits, a lower rating of patient affect, and less shared decision-making.8 Moreover, in a study of primary care clinicians, implicit bias was found to affect communication patterns and social interactions, impacting patient outcomes. Downstream effects of racial bias resulted in less speaking, smiling, and social comments when interacting with Black patients.9  

These findings highlight the need to address interpersonal barriers to effective communication in race-discordant patient-physician dyads. A history of segregated neighborhoods and schools might contribute to structural barriers, resulting in lack of familiarity with cultural norms outside one's culture, which might globally perpetuate poor communication and patient outcomes.  

The "compliment, discuss, and suggest" method might lead to more positive physician-patient encounters by having the dermatologist focus on empathetically understanding the patient's perspective.10 Effective communication, understanding cultural hair care practices, and a thorough scalp examination are paramount for patients with tightly coiled hair.11 Early intervention in TA is crucial and involves partnering with patients and parents to amend high-risk hairstyling routines with cultural humility. 

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Grayson is from the Florida State University College of Medicine Internal Medicine Residency Program, Tallahassee. Dr. Heath is from the Department of Dermatology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Candrice R. Heath, MD, 3401 N Broad St, 5OB, Philadelphia, PA 19140 ([email protected]). 

Issue
cutis - 108(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
20-22
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Grayson is from the Florida State University College of Medicine Internal Medicine Residency Program, Tallahassee. Dr. Heath is from the Department of Dermatology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Candrice R. Heath, MD, 3401 N Broad St, 5OB, Philadelphia, PA 19140 ([email protected]). 

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Grayson is from the Florida State University College of Medicine Internal Medicine Residency Program, Tallahassee. Dr. Heath is from the Department of Dermatology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Candrice R. Heath, MD, 3401 N Broad St, 5OB, Philadelphia, PA 19140 ([email protected]). 

Article PDF
Article PDF
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society


Traction alopecia (TA)--one of the most common types of hair loss in Black women (although not exclusive to Black women)--is reversible when early corrective measures are taken; if chronic tension continues, however, permanent scarring alopecia ensues. Dermatologists can prevent worsening of this distressing hair loss. Due to a dearth of training among dermatologists in conditions occurring in patients with tightly coiled hair, it is imperative to add practical methods to the body of dermatology literature, with the goal of enhancing cultural humility.  

Hairstyling among Black women often is a lengthy process and often results in relationship bonding with the hair care giver, in turn imparting hair care traditions to the next generation. Therefore, a well-received discussion about TA prevention not only has an impact on the patient but potentially on a multigenerational family of women and friends. We present a memory aid for discussing TA, with a focus on cultural humility and patient-centered communication. 

Factors contributing to the risk of TA are hairstyles and hair care practices commonly used in Black individuals, including braids, locs, weaves, wigs, and chemical straightening.1 These styles often are worn to increase hair manageability or as a creative expression of beauty. 

Discussing TA can be distressing for physicians and patients, especially in the setting of hair texture discordance. In a study that surveyed Black patients' perception of their dermatologic care both in and outside of a skin of color clinic, 71% of respondents (12/17) said that they prefer a race-concordant dermatologist. Some respondents reported that non-skin of color clinic dermatologists examined their hair with the end of a pencil or not at all; patients interpreted these interactions as disrespectful and racially insensitive.2 Another study found that only 30.2% (19/63) of dermatology chief residents and 12.2% (5/41) of program directors reported a specific rotation during which residents gained experience treating skin of color patients.3 

Due to a paucity of training in diagnosing and treating patients with tightly coiled hair who experience hair loss, some physicians might feel uncomfortable caring for patients who have tightly coiled hair. Although many Black patients prefer to see a race-concordant dermatologist because of their perceived cultural competence and shared experience, there is a paucity of Black dermatologists to see all patients who have tightly coiled hair.4 Therefore, all dermatologists should become skilled and comfortable discussing and treating TA in patients with all hair types. 

METHOD FOR COUNSELING 

The following scenarios are a guide to begin closing the competency gap in counseling about TA, using a "compliment, discuss, and suggest" method.  

Scenario 1 
A Black woman presents with a concern of "thinning edges" (a popular term on social media for TA). A hair-discordant dermatologist tells her, first, that she has TA caused by wearing tight hairstyles and, second, that the treatment is to stop wearing tight braids and weaves and to discontinue chemical relaxers. The dermatologist then leaves the room.  

The Patient's Perspective
It is not uncommon for the patient to have feelings of frustration about how they will style their hair, especially if they are unfamiliar with caring for their hair in its natural state.5 Also, they might have feelings of dismay that the loving childhood hair care giver, often their mother or grandmother, unintentionally harmed them with a tight style. They also might feel betrayed by their hairstylist, who might not have encouraged them to see a dermatologist, or who continued to oblige their request for a high-risk hairstyle. The patient might feel uncomfortable communicating the dermatologist's new recommendations to their hair care team, who also are part of her emotional support system. The patient also might think that the hair-discordant dermatologist has no idea what they "go through" with their hair.  

"Compliment, Discuss, and Suggest" Counseling
Traction alopecia is caused by tight hairstyles that often hurt when they are put in as tight braids, weaves, and ponytails.6 Risk increases if tight styles are applied to chemically straightened hair.1 Braids, sew-in weaves, and wigs with adhesive sometimes are referred to as protective styles. However, these styles can still lead to TA due to excessive tension.  

  • Compliment: "Your hair looks great. I know that you get many compliments."  
  • Discuss: "However, some of the styles might be increasing your risk for hair loss. Our goal is to preserve as many of your follicles as possible."  
  • Suggest: "Let's start by loosening the hairstyle if it is painful when being applied. Pain means inflammation, which can lead to scarring of hair follicles and worsening of hair loss." 

Using pronouns such as we, us, and our is intentional. Doing so signals that the dermatologist is a partner with the patient in the treatment of TA. Starting with a simple initial recommendation gives the patient time to process the common thoughts highlighted in The Patient's Perspective section.6  

Scenario 2 
A Black child (we'll call her "Janet") is accompanied by her mother for follow-up of mild atopic dermatitis on the body and scalp. When the dermatologist examines the patient's scalp, they note that she has the fringe sign--retained short hairs along the frontal hairline--that is consistent with TA. Janet's hair is adorned with 2 tight ponytails in the front with colorful decorative balls on ponytail ties, barrettes, and 6 cornrow braids in the back with plastic beads on the ends. The dermatologist counsels about the atopic dermatitis and leaves the room.  

"Compliment, Discuss, and Suggest" Counseling
The use of tight decorative balls on ponytail ties and numerous plastic beads increases the amount of tension and weight on the hair, which may lead to a higher risk for developing traction alopecia.6 It is quite common for children of African descent to wear hair adornments. Proper counseling regarding their use and possible implications is essential. 

  1. Compliment: "You're doing a great job controlling the atopic dermatitis, which can cause Janet's scalp to be dry. Also, her hair is beautiful--it looks like you spent a lot of time on her hair. And Janet, I like the color of your barrettes." 
  2. Discuss: "Mom, I just noticed that a few areas look tight. Let's look together." (The dermatologist points out areas where the scalp is tented upward due to traction, follicular pustules or papules, or the frontal fringe sign.) "I'm on a mission to #savetheedges because we want Janet to grow up with full edges." (Again, loss of "edges" refers to TA.) 
  3. Suggest: "When you do Janet's hair, it's OK if every hair is not in place. In fact, making styles look and feel 1 or 2 weeks old will lessen tension on the scalp. Remove Janet's hair ties to release tension when she is at home and while she's sleeping, if possible. Every minute that the hair is loose really does help."6  

The Parent's Perspective

All parents take pride in their children. In some Black communities, mothers are judged by how well they manage and style their children's hair. Some people might even suggest that parents of children with nonstyled, tightly coiled hair are not fit parents. Anthropologist Sylvia Boone, PhD, found that among the Mende tribe in Sierra Leone, "unkempt, 'neglected,' or 'messy' hair implied that a woman either had loose morals or was insane."7 

Braids are commonly worn by people of African heritage for a variety of reasons, including ease of manageability, to decrease daily hairstyling time, and as an expression of creativity. Intricate neat hairstyles, despite the risk of pain and TA, are perceived as a sign that the child is cared for and loved.6  

FINAL THOUGHTS 

Patient-centered communication is associated with the patient trusting the physician, which is especially important in race-discordant physician-patient relationships. A study found that patient-physician race discordance led to shorter visits, a lower rating of patient affect, and less shared decision-making.8 Moreover, in a study of primary care clinicians, implicit bias was found to affect communication patterns and social interactions, impacting patient outcomes. Downstream effects of racial bias resulted in less speaking, smiling, and social comments when interacting with Black patients.9  

These findings highlight the need to address interpersonal barriers to effective communication in race-discordant patient-physician dyads. A history of segregated neighborhoods and schools might contribute to structural barriers, resulting in lack of familiarity with cultural norms outside one's culture, which might globally perpetuate poor communication and patient outcomes.  

The "compliment, discuss, and suggest" method might lead to more positive physician-patient encounters by having the dermatologist focus on empathetically understanding the patient's perspective.10 Effective communication, understanding cultural hair care practices, and a thorough scalp examination are paramount for patients with tightly coiled hair.11 Early intervention in TA is crucial and involves partnering with patients and parents to amend high-risk hairstyling routines with cultural humility. 


Traction alopecia (TA)--one of the most common types of hair loss in Black women (although not exclusive to Black women)--is reversible when early corrective measures are taken; if chronic tension continues, however, permanent scarring alopecia ensues. Dermatologists can prevent worsening of this distressing hair loss. Due to a dearth of training among dermatologists in conditions occurring in patients with tightly coiled hair, it is imperative to add practical methods to the body of dermatology literature, with the goal of enhancing cultural humility.  

Hairstyling among Black women often is a lengthy process and often results in relationship bonding with the hair care giver, in turn imparting hair care traditions to the next generation. Therefore, a well-received discussion about TA prevention not only has an impact on the patient but potentially on a multigenerational family of women and friends. We present a memory aid for discussing TA, with a focus on cultural humility and patient-centered communication. 

Factors contributing to the risk of TA are hairstyles and hair care practices commonly used in Black individuals, including braids, locs, weaves, wigs, and chemical straightening.1 These styles often are worn to increase hair manageability or as a creative expression of beauty. 

Discussing TA can be distressing for physicians and patients, especially in the setting of hair texture discordance. In a study that surveyed Black patients' perception of their dermatologic care both in and outside of a skin of color clinic, 71% of respondents (12/17) said that they prefer a race-concordant dermatologist. Some respondents reported that non-skin of color clinic dermatologists examined their hair with the end of a pencil or not at all; patients interpreted these interactions as disrespectful and racially insensitive.2 Another study found that only 30.2% (19/63) of dermatology chief residents and 12.2% (5/41) of program directors reported a specific rotation during which residents gained experience treating skin of color patients.3 

Due to a paucity of training in diagnosing and treating patients with tightly coiled hair who experience hair loss, some physicians might feel uncomfortable caring for patients who have tightly coiled hair. Although many Black patients prefer to see a race-concordant dermatologist because of their perceived cultural competence and shared experience, there is a paucity of Black dermatologists to see all patients who have tightly coiled hair.4 Therefore, all dermatologists should become skilled and comfortable discussing and treating TA in patients with all hair types. 

METHOD FOR COUNSELING 

The following scenarios are a guide to begin closing the competency gap in counseling about TA, using a "compliment, discuss, and suggest" method.  

Scenario 1 
A Black woman presents with a concern of "thinning edges" (a popular term on social media for TA). A hair-discordant dermatologist tells her, first, that she has TA caused by wearing tight hairstyles and, second, that the treatment is to stop wearing tight braids and weaves and to discontinue chemical relaxers. The dermatologist then leaves the room.  

The Patient's Perspective
It is not uncommon for the patient to have feelings of frustration about how they will style their hair, especially if they are unfamiliar with caring for their hair in its natural state.5 Also, they might have feelings of dismay that the loving childhood hair care giver, often their mother or grandmother, unintentionally harmed them with a tight style. They also might feel betrayed by their hairstylist, who might not have encouraged them to see a dermatologist, or who continued to oblige their request for a high-risk hairstyle. The patient might feel uncomfortable communicating the dermatologist's new recommendations to their hair care team, who also are part of her emotional support system. The patient also might think that the hair-discordant dermatologist has no idea what they "go through" with their hair.  

"Compliment, Discuss, and Suggest" Counseling
Traction alopecia is caused by tight hairstyles that often hurt when they are put in as tight braids, weaves, and ponytails.6 Risk increases if tight styles are applied to chemically straightened hair.1 Braids, sew-in weaves, and wigs with adhesive sometimes are referred to as protective styles. However, these styles can still lead to TA due to excessive tension.  

  • Compliment: "Your hair looks great. I know that you get many compliments."  
  • Discuss: "However, some of the styles might be increasing your risk for hair loss. Our goal is to preserve as many of your follicles as possible."  
  • Suggest: "Let's start by loosening the hairstyle if it is painful when being applied. Pain means inflammation, which can lead to scarring of hair follicles and worsening of hair loss." 

Using pronouns such as we, us, and our is intentional. Doing so signals that the dermatologist is a partner with the patient in the treatment of TA. Starting with a simple initial recommendation gives the patient time to process the common thoughts highlighted in The Patient's Perspective section.6  

Scenario 2 
A Black child (we'll call her "Janet") is accompanied by her mother for follow-up of mild atopic dermatitis on the body and scalp. When the dermatologist examines the patient's scalp, they note that she has the fringe sign--retained short hairs along the frontal hairline--that is consistent with TA. Janet's hair is adorned with 2 tight ponytails in the front with colorful decorative balls on ponytail ties, barrettes, and 6 cornrow braids in the back with plastic beads on the ends. The dermatologist counsels about the atopic dermatitis and leaves the room.  

"Compliment, Discuss, and Suggest" Counseling
The use of tight decorative balls on ponytail ties and numerous plastic beads increases the amount of tension and weight on the hair, which may lead to a higher risk for developing traction alopecia.6 It is quite common for children of African descent to wear hair adornments. Proper counseling regarding their use and possible implications is essential. 

  1. Compliment: "You're doing a great job controlling the atopic dermatitis, which can cause Janet's scalp to be dry. Also, her hair is beautiful--it looks like you spent a lot of time on her hair. And Janet, I like the color of your barrettes." 
  2. Discuss: "Mom, I just noticed that a few areas look tight. Let's look together." (The dermatologist points out areas where the scalp is tented upward due to traction, follicular pustules or papules, or the frontal fringe sign.) "I'm on a mission to #savetheedges because we want Janet to grow up with full edges." (Again, loss of "edges" refers to TA.) 
  3. Suggest: "When you do Janet's hair, it's OK if every hair is not in place. In fact, making styles look and feel 1 or 2 weeks old will lessen tension on the scalp. Remove Janet's hair ties to release tension when she is at home and while she's sleeping, if possible. Every minute that the hair is loose really does help."6  

The Parent's Perspective

All parents take pride in their children. In some Black communities, mothers are judged by how well they manage and style their children's hair. Some people might even suggest that parents of children with nonstyled, tightly coiled hair are not fit parents. Anthropologist Sylvia Boone, PhD, found that among the Mende tribe in Sierra Leone, "unkempt, 'neglected,' or 'messy' hair implied that a woman either had loose morals or was insane."7 

Braids are commonly worn by people of African heritage for a variety of reasons, including ease of manageability, to decrease daily hairstyling time, and as an expression of creativity. Intricate neat hairstyles, despite the risk of pain and TA, are perceived as a sign that the child is cared for and loved.6  

FINAL THOUGHTS 

Patient-centered communication is associated with the patient trusting the physician, which is especially important in race-discordant physician-patient relationships. A study found that patient-physician race discordance led to shorter visits, a lower rating of patient affect, and less shared decision-making.8 Moreover, in a study of primary care clinicians, implicit bias was found to affect communication patterns and social interactions, impacting patient outcomes. Downstream effects of racial bias resulted in less speaking, smiling, and social comments when interacting with Black patients.9  

These findings highlight the need to address interpersonal barriers to effective communication in race-discordant patient-physician dyads. A history of segregated neighborhoods and schools might contribute to structural barriers, resulting in lack of familiarity with cultural norms outside one's culture, which might globally perpetuate poor communication and patient outcomes.  

The "compliment, discuss, and suggest" method might lead to more positive physician-patient encounters by having the dermatologist focus on empathetically understanding the patient's perspective.10 Effective communication, understanding cultural hair care practices, and a thorough scalp examination are paramount for patients with tightly coiled hair.11 Early intervention in TA is crucial and involves partnering with patients and parents to amend high-risk hairstyling routines with cultural humility. 

Issue
cutis - 108(1)
Issue
cutis - 108(1)
Page Number
20-22
Page Number
20-22
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • When communicating with patients regarding traction alopecia (TA), it is crucial to display cultural humility and empathy.
  • Understanding the patient’s hair care goals and perspective allows dermatologists to take a more individualized approach to counseling about TA.
  • The “compliment, discuss, and suggest” method is an empathetic and culturally sensitive method for discussing TA with patients.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Thu, 07/15/2021 - 14:30
Un-Gate On Date
Thu, 07/15/2021 - 14:30
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Thu, 07/15/2021 - 14:30
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media

Atopic Dermatitis

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 07/09/2021 - 11:29

Photographs courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD.

The Comparison

A Pink scaling plaques and erythematous erosions in the antecubital fossae of a 6-year-old White boy.

B Violaceous, hyperpigmented, nummular plaques on the back and extensor surface of the right arm of a 16-month-old Black girl.

C Atopic dermatitis and follicular prominence/accentuation on the neck of a young Black girl.

Epidemiology

People of African descent have the highest atopic dermatitis prevalence and severity.

Key clinical features in people with darker skin tones include:

  • follicular prominence
  • papular morphology
  • prurigo nodules
  • hyperpigmented, violaceous-brown or gray plaques instead of erythematous plaques
  • lichenification
  • treatment resistant.1,2

Worth noting
Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and postinflammatory hypopigmentation may be more distressing to the patient/family than the atopic dermatitis itself.

Health disparity highlight
In the United States, patients with skin of color are more likely to be hospitalized with severe atopic dermatitis, have more substantial out-ofpocket costs, be underinsured, and have an increased number of missed days of work. Limited access to outpatient health care plays a role in exacerbating this health disparity.3,4

References
  1. McKenzie C, Silverberg JI. The prevalence and persistence of atopic dermatitis in urban United States children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;123:173-178.e1. doi:10.1016 /j.anai.2019.05.014 
  2. Kim Y, Bloomberg M, Rifas-Shiman SL, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in incidence and persistence of childhood atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139:827-834. doi:10.1016 /j.jid.2018.10.029 
  3. Narla S, Hsu DY, Thyssen JP, et al. Predictors of hospitalization, length of stay, and costs of care among adult and pediatric inpatients with atopic dermatitis in the United States. Dermatitis. 2018;29:22-31. doi:10.1097/DER.0000000000000323
  4. Silverberg JI. Health care utilization, patient costs, and access to care in US adults with eczema. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:743-752. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.5432
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Candrice R. Heath is from Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Dr. Richard P. Usatine is from the University of Texas Health at San Antonio.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Issue
cutis - 107(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
332
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Candrice R. Heath is from Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Dr. Richard P. Usatine is from the University of Texas Health at San Antonio.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Candrice R. Heath is from Temple University Hospital Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Dr. Richard P. Usatine is from the University of Texas Health at San Antonio.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Article PDF
Article PDF

Photographs courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD.

The Comparison

A Pink scaling plaques and erythematous erosions in the antecubital fossae of a 6-year-old White boy.

B Violaceous, hyperpigmented, nummular plaques on the back and extensor surface of the right arm of a 16-month-old Black girl.

C Atopic dermatitis and follicular prominence/accentuation on the neck of a young Black girl.

Epidemiology

People of African descent have the highest atopic dermatitis prevalence and severity.

Key clinical features in people with darker skin tones include:

  • follicular prominence
  • papular morphology
  • prurigo nodules
  • hyperpigmented, violaceous-brown or gray plaques instead of erythematous plaques
  • lichenification
  • treatment resistant.1,2

Worth noting
Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and postinflammatory hypopigmentation may be more distressing to the patient/family than the atopic dermatitis itself.

Health disparity highlight
In the United States, patients with skin of color are more likely to be hospitalized with severe atopic dermatitis, have more substantial out-ofpocket costs, be underinsured, and have an increased number of missed days of work. Limited access to outpatient health care plays a role in exacerbating this health disparity.3,4

Photographs courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD.

The Comparison

A Pink scaling plaques and erythematous erosions in the antecubital fossae of a 6-year-old White boy.

B Violaceous, hyperpigmented, nummular plaques on the back and extensor surface of the right arm of a 16-month-old Black girl.

C Atopic dermatitis and follicular prominence/accentuation on the neck of a young Black girl.

Epidemiology

People of African descent have the highest atopic dermatitis prevalence and severity.

Key clinical features in people with darker skin tones include:

  • follicular prominence
  • papular morphology
  • prurigo nodules
  • hyperpigmented, violaceous-brown or gray plaques instead of erythematous plaques
  • lichenification
  • treatment resistant.1,2

Worth noting
Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and postinflammatory hypopigmentation may be more distressing to the patient/family than the atopic dermatitis itself.

Health disparity highlight
In the United States, patients with skin of color are more likely to be hospitalized with severe atopic dermatitis, have more substantial out-ofpocket costs, be underinsured, and have an increased number of missed days of work. Limited access to outpatient health care plays a role in exacerbating this health disparity.3,4

References
  1. McKenzie C, Silverberg JI. The prevalence and persistence of atopic dermatitis in urban United States children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;123:173-178.e1. doi:10.1016 /j.anai.2019.05.014 
  2. Kim Y, Bloomberg M, Rifas-Shiman SL, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in incidence and persistence of childhood atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139:827-834. doi:10.1016 /j.jid.2018.10.029 
  3. Narla S, Hsu DY, Thyssen JP, et al. Predictors of hospitalization, length of stay, and costs of care among adult and pediatric inpatients with atopic dermatitis in the United States. Dermatitis. 2018;29:22-31. doi:10.1097/DER.0000000000000323
  4. Silverberg JI. Health care utilization, patient costs, and access to care in US adults with eczema. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:743-752. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.5432
References
  1. McKenzie C, Silverberg JI. The prevalence and persistence of atopic dermatitis in urban United States children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;123:173-178.e1. doi:10.1016 /j.anai.2019.05.014 
  2. Kim Y, Bloomberg M, Rifas-Shiman SL, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in incidence and persistence of childhood atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139:827-834. doi:10.1016 /j.jid.2018.10.029 
  3. Narla S, Hsu DY, Thyssen JP, et al. Predictors of hospitalization, length of stay, and costs of care among adult and pediatric inpatients with atopic dermatitis in the United States. Dermatitis. 2018;29:22-31. doi:10.1097/DER.0000000000000323
  4. Silverberg JI. Health care utilization, patient costs, and access to care in US adults with eczema. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:743-752. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.5432
Issue
cutis - 107(6)
Issue
cutis - 107(6)
Page Number
332
Page Number
332
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Mon, 06/14/2021 - 12:15
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 06/14/2021 - 12:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 06/14/2021 - 12:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media

Microaggressions in Medicine

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/25/2021 - 12:44
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society

As manifestations of overt racism and macroaggressions have gained increased visibility, there is a need for discussion of another expression of racism: microaggressions. Although racism classically is viewed as blatant structural, attitudinal, and behavioral prejudice, experts pose that the face of racism has evolved into a more covert insidious form. This form of racism was originally coined racial microaggressions by psychiatrist Chester M. Pierce, MD, 50 years ago.1,2 Since that time, microaggressions have further expanded to describe “brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral, and environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial, gender, sexual-orientation, and religious slights and insults to the target person or group.” 3 This article aims to define and depict examples of microaggressions in medicine, discuss the resulting harmful effects, and offer strategies to minimize and counter these negative ramifications.

What are microaggressions?

Microaggressions are behaviors that stem from implicit bias and occur at an interpersonal level. Implicit bias refers to unconscious stereotypes, assumptions, and beliefs held about an individual’s identity. One of the earliest microaggressions—invisibility—was characterized by Ralph Ellison in his novel Invisible Man. Ellison states, “I am invisible, understand, simply because people refuse to see me . . . When they approach me they see only my surroundings, themselves, or figments of their imagination—indeed, everything and anything except me.”4 This concept of invisibility is a primary microaggression faced by people of color.

In medicine, microaggressions and implicit bias may be encountered throughout medical training and clinical practice in interactions with colleagues, superiors, patients, and patients’ families.5,6 Examples of microaggressions in medicine include demeaning comments, nonverbal disrespect, generalizations of social identity, assumption of nonphysician status, role- or credential-questioning behavior, explicit epithets, rejection of care, questioning or inquiries of ethnic/racial origin, and sexual harassment.7

An example of microaggressions in medicine was fully displayed when physician Tamika Cross described her experience of being turned away from helping an unresponsive passenger during a flight emergency.

[T]he flight attendant yells “call overhead for a physician on board.” I raised my hand to grab her attention. She said to me “oh no sweetie put [your] hand down, we are looking for actual physicians or nurses or some type of medical personnel, we don’t have time to talk to you” . . . Another “seasoned” white male approaches the row and says he is a physician as well. She says to me “thanks for your help but he can help us, and he has his credentials.”8

What are the effects of microaggressions?

Although microaggressions may be unconscious and unintentional by the offender, the negative ramifications are notable. Recent studies report that women and underrepresented minority (URM) medical students, residents, and physicians experience microaggressions and implicit bias at a higher prevalence and frequency compared with their male and non-URM counterparts.7,9 Repetitive microaggressions are harmful to the health and safety of women and URM medical students, residents, physicians, other providers, and patients. The Table provides example scenarios of microaggressions in medicine categorized according to Berk.10

Microaggressions negatively impact physical, mental, and emotional well-being. Current data support that medical students and residents who experience microaggressions are more likely to report associated symptoms of burnout, depression, and suicidal thoughts.11,12 Subjection to persistent bias can lead to minority status stress and racial battle fatigue, creating feelings of invisibility, isolation, exclusion, and loneliness for those impacted.13,14

In the book Black Man in a White Coat: A Doctor’s Reflections on Race and Medicine, Damon Tweedy, MD, reflects on race in medicine. Tweedy notes his experience as a medical student when a professor mistakenly assumed he was a maintenance worker in the classroom. Tweedy describes how he internalized the exchange and, despite his success throughout the course of his medical training, combatted feelings of anxiety, self-doubt, and implied inferiority.15

Although microaggressions are harmful to one’s health, they also undermine the learning and teaching experience for students, residents, and faculty, and they detract from the larger goal of providing care for patients.11 Frequent devaluing and questioning of an individual’s contributions, qualifications, and credentials based on identity can lower productivity and problem-solving abilities. These behaviors cultivate an unwelcome and hostile work/learning environment that is stressful and polarizing for the recipient.

Despite the heavy burden of microaggressions, most students, residents, and faculty physicians do not report incidents to their institutions and feel that training, resources, and policies to respond to bias adequately are lacking.7 As a result of implicit bias and microaggressions, women and URM medical students and providers are unable to focus solely on the practice of medicine. They are tasked with the additional burden of shouldering the emotional and cognitive complexities that microaggressions produce.16

What are strategies to reduce microaggressions in medicine?

To minimize the harmful effects of microaggressions, intervention strategies must be implemented that reduce the likelihood of the occurrence of microaggressions and challenge the stereotypes that undergird implicit bias. These strategies include cultivating allies, followed by demanding structural accountability. Allies are members of the majority group who collectively collaborate with members of the nonmajority group to effect change through the promotion of diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts.17 Cultivating allies involves building a network of collaboration among these groups and emphasizes education. Education is critical for allies to address microaggressions at the interpersonal level. This process of education involves personal reflection and self-awareness in exploring one’s biases, fears, and assumptions. Integral to this step is broadening one’s acceptance of different cultures, racial/ethnic groups, and identities. There must be a willingness to engage in difficult or uncomfortable conversations and a readiness to actively listen to concerns rather than perpetuating further harm through avoidance and dismissive or defensive behavior.18

Demanding structural accountability facilitates deconstruction of bias and microaggression at the larger systemic level. This strategy involves implicit bias and antiracism training, development of retention plans, and identification of mentors for women and URM providers and students. Implicit bias and microaggression training and policies should be incorporated into medical education and resident curriculums. Similarly, educational resources and training must be made available to practicing physicians, faculty, and other providers through their institutions and places of employment. Equipping students and providers with the tools needed when microaggressions are witnessed or experienced demonstrates systemic-level accountability and communicates the importance of the issue. Furthermore, the development of retention plans and identification of mentors provide a support system and foster a culture of inclusion where recipients of microaggressions feel protected and valued. Increased feelings of inclusivity and belonging help bridge the gap created through microaggressions and implicit bias.

Final Thoughts

Despite an often covert nature, the detrimental effects of microaggressions are tangible and far reaching. As providers, we must strive to understand all categories of racism and expose the many ways prejudice manifests within medical training and clinical practice. It is our obligation to undertake the challenge of “making the ‘invisible’ visible” as we confront microaggressions and implicit bias to promote a safer and more inclusive medical community and workforce.19

References
  1. Torres MB, Salles A, Cochran A. Recognizing and reacting to microaggressions in medicine and surgery. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:868-872. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1648
  2. Williams MT. Microaggressions: clarification, evidence, and impact. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020;15:3-26. doi:10.1177/1745691619827499
  3. Sue DW. Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation. Wiley; 2010.
  4. Ellison R. Invisible Man. Random House; 1952. 
  5. Molina MF, Landry AI, Chary AN, et al. Addressing the elephant in the room: microaggressions in medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;76:387-391. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.04.009
  6. Overland MK, Zumsteg JM, Lindo EG, et al. Microaggressions in clinical training and practice. PM R. 2019;11:1004-1012. doi:10.1002/pmrj.12229
  7. de Bourmont SS, Burra A, Nouri SS, et al. Resident physician experiences with and responses to biased patients. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2021769. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21769
  8. TK Cross Facebook page. October 9, 2016. Accessed April 19, 2021. https://www.facebook.com/tamika.cross.52/posts/658443077654049
  9. Periyakoil VS, Chaudron L, Hill EV, et al. Common types of gender-based microaggressions in medicine. Acad Med. 2020;95:450-457. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003057
  10. Berk RA. Microaggressions trilogy: part 1. why do microaggressions matter? J Fac Dev. 2017;31:63-73.
  11. Chisholm LP, Jackson KR, Davidson HA, et al. Evaluation of racial microaggressions experienced during medical school training and the effect on medical student education and burnout: a validation study. J Natl Med Assoc. 2020:S0027-9684(20)30428-4. doi:10.1016/j.jnma.2020.11.009
  12. Hu YY, Ellis RJ, Hewitt DB, et al. Discrimination, abuse, harassment, and burnout in surgical residency training. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1741-1752. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1903759
  13. Acholonu RG, Oyeku SO. Addressing microaggressions in the health care workforce-a path toward achieving equity and inclusion. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:E2021770. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21770
  14. O’Keefe VM, Wingate LR, Cole AB, et al. Seemingly harmless racial communications are not so harmless: racial microaggressions lead to suicidal ideation by way of depression symptoms. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2015;45:567-576. doi:10.1111/sltb.12150
  15. Tweedy D. Black Man in a White Coat: A Doctor’s Reflections on Race and Medicine. Picador; 2016. 
  16. Osseo-Asare A, Balasuriya L, Huot SJ, et al. Minority resident physicians’ views on the role of race/ethnicity in their training experiences in the workplace. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:E182723. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2723
  17. Melaku TM, Beeman A, Smith DG, et al. Be a better ally. Harvard Business Review. Published November-December 2020. Accessed April 23, 2021. https://hbr.org/2020/11/be-a-better-ally
  18. Sue DW, Capodilupo CM, Torino GC, et al. Racial microaggressions in everyday life: implications for clinical practice. Am Psychol. 2007;62:271-286. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271
  19. Sue DW. Whiteness and ethnocentric monoculturalism: making the “invisible” visible. Am Psychol. 2004;59:761-769. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.761
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Feaster and Dr. McMichael are from the Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Dr. McKinley-Grant is from the Department of Dermatology, Howard University College of Medicine Hospital, Washington, DC.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Amy J. McMichael, MD, 4618 Country Club Rd, Winston-Salem, NC 27104 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 107(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
235-237
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Feaster and Dr. McMichael are from the Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Dr. McKinley-Grant is from the Department of Dermatology, Howard University College of Medicine Hospital, Washington, DC.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Amy J. McMichael, MD, 4618 Country Club Rd, Winston-Salem, NC 27104 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Feaster and Dr. McMichael are from the Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Dr. McKinley-Grant is from the Department of Dermatology, Howard University College of Medicine Hospital, Washington, DC.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Amy J. McMichael, MD, 4618 Country Club Rd, Winston-Salem, NC 27104 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society

As manifestations of overt racism and macroaggressions have gained increased visibility, there is a need for discussion of another expression of racism: microaggressions. Although racism classically is viewed as blatant structural, attitudinal, and behavioral prejudice, experts pose that the face of racism has evolved into a more covert insidious form. This form of racism was originally coined racial microaggressions by psychiatrist Chester M. Pierce, MD, 50 years ago.1,2 Since that time, microaggressions have further expanded to describe “brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral, and environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial, gender, sexual-orientation, and religious slights and insults to the target person or group.” 3 This article aims to define and depict examples of microaggressions in medicine, discuss the resulting harmful effects, and offer strategies to minimize and counter these negative ramifications.

What are microaggressions?

Microaggressions are behaviors that stem from implicit bias and occur at an interpersonal level. Implicit bias refers to unconscious stereotypes, assumptions, and beliefs held about an individual’s identity. One of the earliest microaggressions—invisibility—was characterized by Ralph Ellison in his novel Invisible Man. Ellison states, “I am invisible, understand, simply because people refuse to see me . . . When they approach me they see only my surroundings, themselves, or figments of their imagination—indeed, everything and anything except me.”4 This concept of invisibility is a primary microaggression faced by people of color.

In medicine, microaggressions and implicit bias may be encountered throughout medical training and clinical practice in interactions with colleagues, superiors, patients, and patients’ families.5,6 Examples of microaggressions in medicine include demeaning comments, nonverbal disrespect, generalizations of social identity, assumption of nonphysician status, role- or credential-questioning behavior, explicit epithets, rejection of care, questioning or inquiries of ethnic/racial origin, and sexual harassment.7

An example of microaggressions in medicine was fully displayed when physician Tamika Cross described her experience of being turned away from helping an unresponsive passenger during a flight emergency.

[T]he flight attendant yells “call overhead for a physician on board.” I raised my hand to grab her attention. She said to me “oh no sweetie put [your] hand down, we are looking for actual physicians or nurses or some type of medical personnel, we don’t have time to talk to you” . . . Another “seasoned” white male approaches the row and says he is a physician as well. She says to me “thanks for your help but he can help us, and he has his credentials.”8

What are the effects of microaggressions?

Although microaggressions may be unconscious and unintentional by the offender, the negative ramifications are notable. Recent studies report that women and underrepresented minority (URM) medical students, residents, and physicians experience microaggressions and implicit bias at a higher prevalence and frequency compared with their male and non-URM counterparts.7,9 Repetitive microaggressions are harmful to the health and safety of women and URM medical students, residents, physicians, other providers, and patients. The Table provides example scenarios of microaggressions in medicine categorized according to Berk.10

Microaggressions negatively impact physical, mental, and emotional well-being. Current data support that medical students and residents who experience microaggressions are more likely to report associated symptoms of burnout, depression, and suicidal thoughts.11,12 Subjection to persistent bias can lead to minority status stress and racial battle fatigue, creating feelings of invisibility, isolation, exclusion, and loneliness for those impacted.13,14

In the book Black Man in a White Coat: A Doctor’s Reflections on Race and Medicine, Damon Tweedy, MD, reflects on race in medicine. Tweedy notes his experience as a medical student when a professor mistakenly assumed he was a maintenance worker in the classroom. Tweedy describes how he internalized the exchange and, despite his success throughout the course of his medical training, combatted feelings of anxiety, self-doubt, and implied inferiority.15

Although microaggressions are harmful to one’s health, they also undermine the learning and teaching experience for students, residents, and faculty, and they detract from the larger goal of providing care for patients.11 Frequent devaluing and questioning of an individual’s contributions, qualifications, and credentials based on identity can lower productivity and problem-solving abilities. These behaviors cultivate an unwelcome and hostile work/learning environment that is stressful and polarizing for the recipient.

Despite the heavy burden of microaggressions, most students, residents, and faculty physicians do not report incidents to their institutions and feel that training, resources, and policies to respond to bias adequately are lacking.7 As a result of implicit bias and microaggressions, women and URM medical students and providers are unable to focus solely on the practice of medicine. They are tasked with the additional burden of shouldering the emotional and cognitive complexities that microaggressions produce.16

What are strategies to reduce microaggressions in medicine?

To minimize the harmful effects of microaggressions, intervention strategies must be implemented that reduce the likelihood of the occurrence of microaggressions and challenge the stereotypes that undergird implicit bias. These strategies include cultivating allies, followed by demanding structural accountability. Allies are members of the majority group who collectively collaborate with members of the nonmajority group to effect change through the promotion of diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts.17 Cultivating allies involves building a network of collaboration among these groups and emphasizes education. Education is critical for allies to address microaggressions at the interpersonal level. This process of education involves personal reflection and self-awareness in exploring one’s biases, fears, and assumptions. Integral to this step is broadening one’s acceptance of different cultures, racial/ethnic groups, and identities. There must be a willingness to engage in difficult or uncomfortable conversations and a readiness to actively listen to concerns rather than perpetuating further harm through avoidance and dismissive or defensive behavior.18

Demanding structural accountability facilitates deconstruction of bias and microaggression at the larger systemic level. This strategy involves implicit bias and antiracism training, development of retention plans, and identification of mentors for women and URM providers and students. Implicit bias and microaggression training and policies should be incorporated into medical education and resident curriculums. Similarly, educational resources and training must be made available to practicing physicians, faculty, and other providers through their institutions and places of employment. Equipping students and providers with the tools needed when microaggressions are witnessed or experienced demonstrates systemic-level accountability and communicates the importance of the issue. Furthermore, the development of retention plans and identification of mentors provide a support system and foster a culture of inclusion where recipients of microaggressions feel protected and valued. Increased feelings of inclusivity and belonging help bridge the gap created through microaggressions and implicit bias.

Final Thoughts

Despite an often covert nature, the detrimental effects of microaggressions are tangible and far reaching. As providers, we must strive to understand all categories of racism and expose the many ways prejudice manifests within medical training and clinical practice. It is our obligation to undertake the challenge of “making the ‘invisible’ visible” as we confront microaggressions and implicit bias to promote a safer and more inclusive medical community and workforce.19

As manifestations of overt racism and macroaggressions have gained increased visibility, there is a need for discussion of another expression of racism: microaggressions. Although racism classically is viewed as blatant structural, attitudinal, and behavioral prejudice, experts pose that the face of racism has evolved into a more covert insidious form. This form of racism was originally coined racial microaggressions by psychiatrist Chester M. Pierce, MD, 50 years ago.1,2 Since that time, microaggressions have further expanded to describe “brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral, and environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial, gender, sexual-orientation, and religious slights and insults to the target person or group.” 3 This article aims to define and depict examples of microaggressions in medicine, discuss the resulting harmful effects, and offer strategies to minimize and counter these negative ramifications.

What are microaggressions?

Microaggressions are behaviors that stem from implicit bias and occur at an interpersonal level. Implicit bias refers to unconscious stereotypes, assumptions, and beliefs held about an individual’s identity. One of the earliest microaggressions—invisibility—was characterized by Ralph Ellison in his novel Invisible Man. Ellison states, “I am invisible, understand, simply because people refuse to see me . . . When they approach me they see only my surroundings, themselves, or figments of their imagination—indeed, everything and anything except me.”4 This concept of invisibility is a primary microaggression faced by people of color.

In medicine, microaggressions and implicit bias may be encountered throughout medical training and clinical practice in interactions with colleagues, superiors, patients, and patients’ families.5,6 Examples of microaggressions in medicine include demeaning comments, nonverbal disrespect, generalizations of social identity, assumption of nonphysician status, role- or credential-questioning behavior, explicit epithets, rejection of care, questioning or inquiries of ethnic/racial origin, and sexual harassment.7

An example of microaggressions in medicine was fully displayed when physician Tamika Cross described her experience of being turned away from helping an unresponsive passenger during a flight emergency.

[T]he flight attendant yells “call overhead for a physician on board.” I raised my hand to grab her attention. She said to me “oh no sweetie put [your] hand down, we are looking for actual physicians or nurses or some type of medical personnel, we don’t have time to talk to you” . . . Another “seasoned” white male approaches the row and says he is a physician as well. She says to me “thanks for your help but he can help us, and he has his credentials.”8

What are the effects of microaggressions?

Although microaggressions may be unconscious and unintentional by the offender, the negative ramifications are notable. Recent studies report that women and underrepresented minority (URM) medical students, residents, and physicians experience microaggressions and implicit bias at a higher prevalence and frequency compared with their male and non-URM counterparts.7,9 Repetitive microaggressions are harmful to the health and safety of women and URM medical students, residents, physicians, other providers, and patients. The Table provides example scenarios of microaggressions in medicine categorized according to Berk.10

Microaggressions negatively impact physical, mental, and emotional well-being. Current data support that medical students and residents who experience microaggressions are more likely to report associated symptoms of burnout, depression, and suicidal thoughts.11,12 Subjection to persistent bias can lead to minority status stress and racial battle fatigue, creating feelings of invisibility, isolation, exclusion, and loneliness for those impacted.13,14

In the book Black Man in a White Coat: A Doctor’s Reflections on Race and Medicine, Damon Tweedy, MD, reflects on race in medicine. Tweedy notes his experience as a medical student when a professor mistakenly assumed he was a maintenance worker in the classroom. Tweedy describes how he internalized the exchange and, despite his success throughout the course of his medical training, combatted feelings of anxiety, self-doubt, and implied inferiority.15

Although microaggressions are harmful to one’s health, they also undermine the learning and teaching experience for students, residents, and faculty, and they detract from the larger goal of providing care for patients.11 Frequent devaluing and questioning of an individual’s contributions, qualifications, and credentials based on identity can lower productivity and problem-solving abilities. These behaviors cultivate an unwelcome and hostile work/learning environment that is stressful and polarizing for the recipient.

Despite the heavy burden of microaggressions, most students, residents, and faculty physicians do not report incidents to their institutions and feel that training, resources, and policies to respond to bias adequately are lacking.7 As a result of implicit bias and microaggressions, women and URM medical students and providers are unable to focus solely on the practice of medicine. They are tasked with the additional burden of shouldering the emotional and cognitive complexities that microaggressions produce.16

What are strategies to reduce microaggressions in medicine?

To minimize the harmful effects of microaggressions, intervention strategies must be implemented that reduce the likelihood of the occurrence of microaggressions and challenge the stereotypes that undergird implicit bias. These strategies include cultivating allies, followed by demanding structural accountability. Allies are members of the majority group who collectively collaborate with members of the nonmajority group to effect change through the promotion of diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts.17 Cultivating allies involves building a network of collaboration among these groups and emphasizes education. Education is critical for allies to address microaggressions at the interpersonal level. This process of education involves personal reflection and self-awareness in exploring one’s biases, fears, and assumptions. Integral to this step is broadening one’s acceptance of different cultures, racial/ethnic groups, and identities. There must be a willingness to engage in difficult or uncomfortable conversations and a readiness to actively listen to concerns rather than perpetuating further harm through avoidance and dismissive or defensive behavior.18

Demanding structural accountability facilitates deconstruction of bias and microaggression at the larger systemic level. This strategy involves implicit bias and antiracism training, development of retention plans, and identification of mentors for women and URM providers and students. Implicit bias and microaggression training and policies should be incorporated into medical education and resident curriculums. Similarly, educational resources and training must be made available to practicing physicians, faculty, and other providers through their institutions and places of employment. Equipping students and providers with the tools needed when microaggressions are witnessed or experienced demonstrates systemic-level accountability and communicates the importance of the issue. Furthermore, the development of retention plans and identification of mentors provide a support system and foster a culture of inclusion where recipients of microaggressions feel protected and valued. Increased feelings of inclusivity and belonging help bridge the gap created through microaggressions and implicit bias.

Final Thoughts

Despite an often covert nature, the detrimental effects of microaggressions are tangible and far reaching. As providers, we must strive to understand all categories of racism and expose the many ways prejudice manifests within medical training and clinical practice. It is our obligation to undertake the challenge of “making the ‘invisible’ visible” as we confront microaggressions and implicit bias to promote a safer and more inclusive medical community and workforce.19

References
  1. Torres MB, Salles A, Cochran A. Recognizing and reacting to microaggressions in medicine and surgery. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:868-872. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1648
  2. Williams MT. Microaggressions: clarification, evidence, and impact. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020;15:3-26. doi:10.1177/1745691619827499
  3. Sue DW. Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation. Wiley; 2010.
  4. Ellison R. Invisible Man. Random House; 1952. 
  5. Molina MF, Landry AI, Chary AN, et al. Addressing the elephant in the room: microaggressions in medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;76:387-391. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.04.009
  6. Overland MK, Zumsteg JM, Lindo EG, et al. Microaggressions in clinical training and practice. PM R. 2019;11:1004-1012. doi:10.1002/pmrj.12229
  7. de Bourmont SS, Burra A, Nouri SS, et al. Resident physician experiences with and responses to biased patients. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2021769. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21769
  8. TK Cross Facebook page. October 9, 2016. Accessed April 19, 2021. https://www.facebook.com/tamika.cross.52/posts/658443077654049
  9. Periyakoil VS, Chaudron L, Hill EV, et al. Common types of gender-based microaggressions in medicine. Acad Med. 2020;95:450-457. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003057
  10. Berk RA. Microaggressions trilogy: part 1. why do microaggressions matter? J Fac Dev. 2017;31:63-73.
  11. Chisholm LP, Jackson KR, Davidson HA, et al. Evaluation of racial microaggressions experienced during medical school training and the effect on medical student education and burnout: a validation study. J Natl Med Assoc. 2020:S0027-9684(20)30428-4. doi:10.1016/j.jnma.2020.11.009
  12. Hu YY, Ellis RJ, Hewitt DB, et al. Discrimination, abuse, harassment, and burnout in surgical residency training. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1741-1752. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1903759
  13. Acholonu RG, Oyeku SO. Addressing microaggressions in the health care workforce-a path toward achieving equity and inclusion. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:E2021770. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21770
  14. O’Keefe VM, Wingate LR, Cole AB, et al. Seemingly harmless racial communications are not so harmless: racial microaggressions lead to suicidal ideation by way of depression symptoms. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2015;45:567-576. doi:10.1111/sltb.12150
  15. Tweedy D. Black Man in a White Coat: A Doctor’s Reflections on Race and Medicine. Picador; 2016. 
  16. Osseo-Asare A, Balasuriya L, Huot SJ, et al. Minority resident physicians’ views on the role of race/ethnicity in their training experiences in the workplace. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:E182723. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2723
  17. Melaku TM, Beeman A, Smith DG, et al. Be a better ally. Harvard Business Review. Published November-December 2020. Accessed April 23, 2021. https://hbr.org/2020/11/be-a-better-ally
  18. Sue DW, Capodilupo CM, Torino GC, et al. Racial microaggressions in everyday life: implications for clinical practice. Am Psychol. 2007;62:271-286. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271
  19. Sue DW. Whiteness and ethnocentric monoculturalism: making the “invisible” visible. Am Psychol. 2004;59:761-769. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.761
References
  1. Torres MB, Salles A, Cochran A. Recognizing and reacting to microaggressions in medicine and surgery. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:868-872. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1648
  2. Williams MT. Microaggressions: clarification, evidence, and impact. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020;15:3-26. doi:10.1177/1745691619827499
  3. Sue DW. Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation. Wiley; 2010.
  4. Ellison R. Invisible Man. Random House; 1952. 
  5. Molina MF, Landry AI, Chary AN, et al. Addressing the elephant in the room: microaggressions in medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;76:387-391. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.04.009
  6. Overland MK, Zumsteg JM, Lindo EG, et al. Microaggressions in clinical training and practice. PM R. 2019;11:1004-1012. doi:10.1002/pmrj.12229
  7. de Bourmont SS, Burra A, Nouri SS, et al. Resident physician experiences with and responses to biased patients. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2021769. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21769
  8. TK Cross Facebook page. October 9, 2016. Accessed April 19, 2021. https://www.facebook.com/tamika.cross.52/posts/658443077654049
  9. Periyakoil VS, Chaudron L, Hill EV, et al. Common types of gender-based microaggressions in medicine. Acad Med. 2020;95:450-457. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003057
  10. Berk RA. Microaggressions trilogy: part 1. why do microaggressions matter? J Fac Dev. 2017;31:63-73.
  11. Chisholm LP, Jackson KR, Davidson HA, et al. Evaluation of racial microaggressions experienced during medical school training and the effect on medical student education and burnout: a validation study. J Natl Med Assoc. 2020:S0027-9684(20)30428-4. doi:10.1016/j.jnma.2020.11.009
  12. Hu YY, Ellis RJ, Hewitt DB, et al. Discrimination, abuse, harassment, and burnout in surgical residency training. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1741-1752. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1903759
  13. Acholonu RG, Oyeku SO. Addressing microaggressions in the health care workforce-a path toward achieving equity and inclusion. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:E2021770. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21770
  14. O’Keefe VM, Wingate LR, Cole AB, et al. Seemingly harmless racial communications are not so harmless: racial microaggressions lead to suicidal ideation by way of depression symptoms. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2015;45:567-576. doi:10.1111/sltb.12150
  15. Tweedy D. Black Man in a White Coat: A Doctor’s Reflections on Race and Medicine. Picador; 2016. 
  16. Osseo-Asare A, Balasuriya L, Huot SJ, et al. Minority resident physicians’ views on the role of race/ethnicity in their training experiences in the workplace. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:E182723. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2723
  17. Melaku TM, Beeman A, Smith DG, et al. Be a better ally. Harvard Business Review. Published November-December 2020. Accessed April 23, 2021. https://hbr.org/2020/11/be-a-better-ally
  18. Sue DW, Capodilupo CM, Torino GC, et al. Racial microaggressions in everyday life: implications for clinical practice. Am Psychol. 2007;62:271-286. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271
  19. Sue DW. Whiteness and ethnocentric monoculturalism: making the “invisible” visible. Am Psychol. 2004;59:761-769. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.761
Issue
Cutis - 107(5)
Issue
Cutis - 107(5)
Page Number
235-237
Page Number
235-237
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • As providers, we must strive to understand all categories of racism and expose the many ways prejudice manifests within medical training and clinical practice.
  • Intervention strategies must be implemented to reduce the likelihood of the occurrence of microaggressions in medicine and challenge the stereotypes that undergird implicit bias.
  • It is important to promote collaboration in diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts to demonstrate support for women and underrepresented minority medical students, residents, physicians, providers, and patients.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media

The Importance of Service Learning in Dermatology Residency: An Actionable Approach to Improve Resident Education and Skin Health Equity

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 03/08/2021 - 23:23
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society

Access to specialty care such as dermatology is a challenge for patients living in underserved communities.1 In 2019, there were 29.6 million individuals without health insurance in the United States—9.2% of the population—up from 28.6 million the prior year.2 Furthermore, Black and Hispanic patients, American Indian and Alaskan Natives, and Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islanders are more likely to be uninsured than their White counterparts.3 Community service activities such as free skin cancer screenings, partnerships with community practices, and teledermatology consultations through free clinics are instrumental in mitigating health care disparities and improving access to dermatologic care. In this article, we build on existing models from dermatology residency programs across the country to propose actionable methods to expand service-learning opportunities in dermatology residency training and increase health care equity in dermatology.

Why Service Learning?

Service learning is an educational approach that combines learning objectives with community service to provide a comprehensive scholastic experience and meet societal needs.4 In pilot studies of family medicine residents, service-learning initiatives enhanced the standard residency curriculum by promoting clinical practice resourcefulness.5 Dermatology Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements mandate that residents demonstrate an awareness of the larger context of health care, including social determinants of health.6 Likewise, dermatology residents must recognize the impact of socioeconomic status on health care utilization, treatment options, and patient adherence. With this understanding, residents can advocate for quality patient care and improve community-based health care systems.6

Service-learning projects can effectively meet the specific health needs of a community. In a service-learning environment, residents will understand a community-based health care approach and work with attending physician role models who exhibit a community service ethic.7 Residents also can gain interprofessional experience through collaborating with a team of social workers, community health workers, care coordinators, pharmacists, nurses, medical students, and attending physicians. Furthermore, residents can practice communicating effectively with patients and families across a range of socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds. Interprofessional, team-based care and interpersonal skill acquisition are both Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements for dermatology training.6 Through increased service-learning opportunities, dermatology trainees will learn to recognize and mitigate social determinants of health with a holistic, patient-centered treatment plan.

Free or low-cost medical clinics provide health care to more than 15 million Americans, many of whom identify with marginalized racial and ethnic groups.8 In a dermatology access study, a sample of clinics listed in the National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics database were contacted regarding the availability of dermatologic care; however, more than half of the sites were unresponsive or closed, and the remaining clinics offered limited access to dermatology services.9 The scarcity of free and low-cost dermatologic services likely contributes to adverse skin health outcomes for patients in underserved communities.10 By increasing service learning within dermatology residency training programs, access to dermatologic care will improve for underserved and uninsured populations.

Actionable Methods to Increase Service Learning in Dermatology Residency Training Programs

 

Utilize Programming Offered Through National Dermatology Associations and Societies
The American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) has developed programming through which faculty, residents, and private practice dermatologists perform community service targeting underserved populations. SPOT me , a skin cancer screening program, is the AAD’s longest-standing public health program through which it provides complimentary screening forms, handouts, and advertisements to facilitate skin cancer screening. AccessDerm is the AAD’s philanthropic teledermatology program that delivers dermatologic care to underserved communities. Camp Discovery and the Shade Structure Grant Program are additional initiatives promoted by the AAD to support volunteer services for communities while learning about dermatology. Residents may apply for AAD grants to subsidize participation in the Native American Health Service Resident Rotation Program, the Skin Care for Developing Countries program, or an international grant.

The Women’s Dermatologic Society hosts 3 primary umbrella community outreach initiatives: Play Safe in the Sun, Coast-2-Coast, and the Transforming Interconnecting Project Program Women’s Shelter Initiative. From uplifting and educating individuals in women’s shelters about skin care, oral hygiene, self-care, nutrition, and social skills to providing complimentary skin cancer screenings, the Women’s Dermatologic Society provides easily accessible tool kits and syllabi to facilitate project composition and completion by its members.

Implement Residency Class Service-Learning Projects
Incoming dermatology residents are regularly encouraged to draft research proposals at the beginning of each academic year. Encouraging residency classes to work collectively on a dermatology service-learning project likely will increase resident camaraderie and project success while minimizing internal competition. In developing a service-learning proposal, residents should engage with community leaders and groups to best understand how to meet the skin health needs of underserved communities. The project should have clear objectives, benchmarks, and full support of the dermatology department. Short-term service-learning projects are completed when set goals are achieved, while sustainable projects continue with each new resident class.

Partner With Existing Community or Federally Funded Clinics
Establishing partnerships with free or federally funded health centers is a reliable way to increase service-learning opportunities in dermatology residency training. Personal malpractice carriers often include free clinic coverage, and most states offer limited liability or immunity for physicians who volunteer their professional services or subsidize malpractice insurance purchases.11 In light of the global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, teledermatology options should be explored alongside in-person services. Although logistics may vary based on institutional preference, the following are our recommendations for building community partnerships for dermatology service learning (Figure):

Action items to build community partnerships for dermatology service learning. AAD indicates American Academy of Dermatology; WDS, Women's Dermatologic Society.

• Secure departmental and institutional support. This includes requesting supplies, donations, and dermatopathology support

• Designate a resident or faculty community service champion to lead clinic correspondence and oversee operative logistics. This individual will establish a working partnership with the community clinic, assess the needs of the patient population, and manage the clinic schedule. The champion also will initiate and maintain open lines of communication with community providers for continuity of care. This partnership with community providers allows for shared resources and mutual learning

• Solicit residents to volunteer on a rotating schedule. Although some residents are fully committed to community service and health care justice, all residents need to participate in the service-learning program

• Participate in sustainable community engagement on a schedule that suits the needs of the community and takes into consideration resident and attending availability

Final Thoughts

Service learning in dermatology residency training is essential to improve access to equitable dermatologic care and train clinically competent dermatologists who have experience practicing in resource-limited settings. Service learning places cultural awareness and an understanding of socioeconomic determinants of health at the forefront.12 Some dermatology residency programs treat a high percentage of medically underserved patients; others have integrated service learning into dermatology rotations, and a few programs offer community engagement–focused residency tracks.13-16 Each dermatology program should evaluate its workforce, resources, and nearby underserved communities to strategically develop a program-specific service-learning program. Service-learning clinics often are the sole means by which patients from underserved communities receive dermatologic care.17 A commitment to service learning in dermatology residency programs will improve skin health equity and improve dermatology residency education.

References
  1. Cook NL, Hicks LS, O’Malley J, et al. Access to specialty care and medical services in community health centers. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26:1459-1468.
  2. Broaddus M, Aron-Dine A. Uninsured rate rose again in 2019, further eroding earlier progress. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities website. Published September 15, 2020. Accessed February 9, 2021. https://www.cbpp.org/research/health/uninsured-rate-rose-again-in-2019-further-eroding-earlier-progress
  3. Artiga S, Orgera K, Damico A. Changes in health coverage by race and ethnicity since the ACA, 2010-2018. Kaiser Family Foundation website. Published March 5, 2020. Accessed February 9, 2021. https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/issue-brief/changes-in-health-coverage-by-race-and-ethnicity-since-the-aca-2010-2018/
  4. Martinez MG. H.R.2010 - 103rd Congress (1993-1994): National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993. AmeriCorps website. Accessed November 24, 2020. https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/2010
  5. Gefter L, Merrell SB, Rosas LG, et al. Service-based learning for residents: a success for communities and medical education. Fam Med. 2015;47:803-806.
  6. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Dermatology. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website. Updated July 1, 2020. Accessed February 9, 2021. https://acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/080_Dermatology_2020.pdf?ver=2020-06-29-161626-133
  7. 7. Blanco G, Vasquez R, Nezafati K, et al. How residency programs can foster practice for the underserved. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:158-159.
  8. Darnell JS. Free clinics in the United States: a nationwide survey. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:946.
  9. Madray V, Ginjupalli S, Hashmi O, et al. Access to dermatology services at free medical clinics: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81:245-246.
  10. Shi L, Stevens GD. Vulnerability and unmet health care needs: the influence of multiple risk factors. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:148-154.
  11. Benrud L, Darrah J, Johnson A. Liability considerations for physician volunteers in the US. Virtual Mentor. 2010;12:207-212.
  12. Service-learning plays vital role in understanding social determinants of health. AAMC website. Published September 27, 2016. Accessed February 22, 2021. https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/service-learning-plays-vital-role-understanding-social-determinants-health
  13. Sheu J, Gonzalez E, Gaeta JM, et al. Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program–Harvard Dermatology collaboration: a service-learning model providing care for an underserved population. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6:789-790.
  14. Ojeda VD, Romero L, Ortiz A. A model for sustainable laser tattoo removal services for adult probationers. Int J Prison Health. 2019;15:308-315.
  15. Diversity & Community Track (Dermatology Diversity and Community Engagement residency position). Penn Medicine Dermatology website. Accessed February 9, 2021. https://dermatology.upenn.edu/residents/diversity-community-track/
  16. Duke Dermatology Diversity and Community Engagement residency position (1529080A2). Duke Dermatology website. Accessed February 9, 2021. https://dermatology.duke.edu/node/4742
  17. Buster KJ, Stevens EI, Elmets CA. Dermatologic health disparities. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30:53-59.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Humphrey is from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania. Dr. James is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Victoria S. Humphrey, BS, 3708 Fifth Ave, Ste 500.68, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 ([email protected]).

Issue
cutis - 107(3)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
120-122
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Humphrey is from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania. Dr. James is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Victoria S. Humphrey, BS, 3708 Fifth Ave, Ste 500.68, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Humphrey is from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania. Dr. James is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Victoria S. Humphrey, BS, 3708 Fifth Ave, Ste 500.68, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society

Access to specialty care such as dermatology is a challenge for patients living in underserved communities.1 In 2019, there were 29.6 million individuals without health insurance in the United States—9.2% of the population—up from 28.6 million the prior year.2 Furthermore, Black and Hispanic patients, American Indian and Alaskan Natives, and Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islanders are more likely to be uninsured than their White counterparts.3 Community service activities such as free skin cancer screenings, partnerships with community practices, and teledermatology consultations through free clinics are instrumental in mitigating health care disparities and improving access to dermatologic care. In this article, we build on existing models from dermatology residency programs across the country to propose actionable methods to expand service-learning opportunities in dermatology residency training and increase health care equity in dermatology.

Why Service Learning?

Service learning is an educational approach that combines learning objectives with community service to provide a comprehensive scholastic experience and meet societal needs.4 In pilot studies of family medicine residents, service-learning initiatives enhanced the standard residency curriculum by promoting clinical practice resourcefulness.5 Dermatology Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements mandate that residents demonstrate an awareness of the larger context of health care, including social determinants of health.6 Likewise, dermatology residents must recognize the impact of socioeconomic status on health care utilization, treatment options, and patient adherence. With this understanding, residents can advocate for quality patient care and improve community-based health care systems.6

Service-learning projects can effectively meet the specific health needs of a community. In a service-learning environment, residents will understand a community-based health care approach and work with attending physician role models who exhibit a community service ethic.7 Residents also can gain interprofessional experience through collaborating with a team of social workers, community health workers, care coordinators, pharmacists, nurses, medical students, and attending physicians. Furthermore, residents can practice communicating effectively with patients and families across a range of socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds. Interprofessional, team-based care and interpersonal skill acquisition are both Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements for dermatology training.6 Through increased service-learning opportunities, dermatology trainees will learn to recognize and mitigate social determinants of health with a holistic, patient-centered treatment plan.

Free or low-cost medical clinics provide health care to more than 15 million Americans, many of whom identify with marginalized racial and ethnic groups.8 In a dermatology access study, a sample of clinics listed in the National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics database were contacted regarding the availability of dermatologic care; however, more than half of the sites were unresponsive or closed, and the remaining clinics offered limited access to dermatology services.9 The scarcity of free and low-cost dermatologic services likely contributes to adverse skin health outcomes for patients in underserved communities.10 By increasing service learning within dermatology residency training programs, access to dermatologic care will improve for underserved and uninsured populations.

Actionable Methods to Increase Service Learning in Dermatology Residency Training Programs

 

Utilize Programming Offered Through National Dermatology Associations and Societies
The American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) has developed programming through which faculty, residents, and private practice dermatologists perform community service targeting underserved populations. SPOT me , a skin cancer screening program, is the AAD’s longest-standing public health program through which it provides complimentary screening forms, handouts, and advertisements to facilitate skin cancer screening. AccessDerm is the AAD’s philanthropic teledermatology program that delivers dermatologic care to underserved communities. Camp Discovery and the Shade Structure Grant Program are additional initiatives promoted by the AAD to support volunteer services for communities while learning about dermatology. Residents may apply for AAD grants to subsidize participation in the Native American Health Service Resident Rotation Program, the Skin Care for Developing Countries program, or an international grant.

The Women’s Dermatologic Society hosts 3 primary umbrella community outreach initiatives: Play Safe in the Sun, Coast-2-Coast, and the Transforming Interconnecting Project Program Women’s Shelter Initiative. From uplifting and educating individuals in women’s shelters about skin care, oral hygiene, self-care, nutrition, and social skills to providing complimentary skin cancer screenings, the Women’s Dermatologic Society provides easily accessible tool kits and syllabi to facilitate project composition and completion by its members.

Implement Residency Class Service-Learning Projects
Incoming dermatology residents are regularly encouraged to draft research proposals at the beginning of each academic year. Encouraging residency classes to work collectively on a dermatology service-learning project likely will increase resident camaraderie and project success while minimizing internal competition. In developing a service-learning proposal, residents should engage with community leaders and groups to best understand how to meet the skin health needs of underserved communities. The project should have clear objectives, benchmarks, and full support of the dermatology department. Short-term service-learning projects are completed when set goals are achieved, while sustainable projects continue with each new resident class.

Partner With Existing Community or Federally Funded Clinics
Establishing partnerships with free or federally funded health centers is a reliable way to increase service-learning opportunities in dermatology residency training. Personal malpractice carriers often include free clinic coverage, and most states offer limited liability or immunity for physicians who volunteer their professional services or subsidize malpractice insurance purchases.11 In light of the global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, teledermatology options should be explored alongside in-person services. Although logistics may vary based on institutional preference, the following are our recommendations for building community partnerships for dermatology service learning (Figure):

Action items to build community partnerships for dermatology service learning. AAD indicates American Academy of Dermatology; WDS, Women's Dermatologic Society.

• Secure departmental and institutional support. This includes requesting supplies, donations, and dermatopathology support

• Designate a resident or faculty community service champion to lead clinic correspondence and oversee operative logistics. This individual will establish a working partnership with the community clinic, assess the needs of the patient population, and manage the clinic schedule. The champion also will initiate and maintain open lines of communication with community providers for continuity of care. This partnership with community providers allows for shared resources and mutual learning

• Solicit residents to volunteer on a rotating schedule. Although some residents are fully committed to community service and health care justice, all residents need to participate in the service-learning program

• Participate in sustainable community engagement on a schedule that suits the needs of the community and takes into consideration resident and attending availability

Final Thoughts

Service learning in dermatology residency training is essential to improve access to equitable dermatologic care and train clinically competent dermatologists who have experience practicing in resource-limited settings. Service learning places cultural awareness and an understanding of socioeconomic determinants of health at the forefront.12 Some dermatology residency programs treat a high percentage of medically underserved patients; others have integrated service learning into dermatology rotations, and a few programs offer community engagement–focused residency tracks.13-16 Each dermatology program should evaluate its workforce, resources, and nearby underserved communities to strategically develop a program-specific service-learning program. Service-learning clinics often are the sole means by which patients from underserved communities receive dermatologic care.17 A commitment to service learning in dermatology residency programs will improve skin health equity and improve dermatology residency education.

Access to specialty care such as dermatology is a challenge for patients living in underserved communities.1 In 2019, there were 29.6 million individuals without health insurance in the United States—9.2% of the population—up from 28.6 million the prior year.2 Furthermore, Black and Hispanic patients, American Indian and Alaskan Natives, and Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islanders are more likely to be uninsured than their White counterparts.3 Community service activities such as free skin cancer screenings, partnerships with community practices, and teledermatology consultations through free clinics are instrumental in mitigating health care disparities and improving access to dermatologic care. In this article, we build on existing models from dermatology residency programs across the country to propose actionable methods to expand service-learning opportunities in dermatology residency training and increase health care equity in dermatology.

Why Service Learning?

Service learning is an educational approach that combines learning objectives with community service to provide a comprehensive scholastic experience and meet societal needs.4 In pilot studies of family medicine residents, service-learning initiatives enhanced the standard residency curriculum by promoting clinical practice resourcefulness.5 Dermatology Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements mandate that residents demonstrate an awareness of the larger context of health care, including social determinants of health.6 Likewise, dermatology residents must recognize the impact of socioeconomic status on health care utilization, treatment options, and patient adherence. With this understanding, residents can advocate for quality patient care and improve community-based health care systems.6

Service-learning projects can effectively meet the specific health needs of a community. In a service-learning environment, residents will understand a community-based health care approach and work with attending physician role models who exhibit a community service ethic.7 Residents also can gain interprofessional experience through collaborating with a team of social workers, community health workers, care coordinators, pharmacists, nurses, medical students, and attending physicians. Furthermore, residents can practice communicating effectively with patients and families across a range of socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds. Interprofessional, team-based care and interpersonal skill acquisition are both Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements for dermatology training.6 Through increased service-learning opportunities, dermatology trainees will learn to recognize and mitigate social determinants of health with a holistic, patient-centered treatment plan.

Free or low-cost medical clinics provide health care to more than 15 million Americans, many of whom identify with marginalized racial and ethnic groups.8 In a dermatology access study, a sample of clinics listed in the National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics database were contacted regarding the availability of dermatologic care; however, more than half of the sites were unresponsive or closed, and the remaining clinics offered limited access to dermatology services.9 The scarcity of free and low-cost dermatologic services likely contributes to adverse skin health outcomes for patients in underserved communities.10 By increasing service learning within dermatology residency training programs, access to dermatologic care will improve for underserved and uninsured populations.

Actionable Methods to Increase Service Learning in Dermatology Residency Training Programs

 

Utilize Programming Offered Through National Dermatology Associations and Societies
The American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) has developed programming through which faculty, residents, and private practice dermatologists perform community service targeting underserved populations. SPOT me , a skin cancer screening program, is the AAD’s longest-standing public health program through which it provides complimentary screening forms, handouts, and advertisements to facilitate skin cancer screening. AccessDerm is the AAD’s philanthropic teledermatology program that delivers dermatologic care to underserved communities. Camp Discovery and the Shade Structure Grant Program are additional initiatives promoted by the AAD to support volunteer services for communities while learning about dermatology. Residents may apply for AAD grants to subsidize participation in the Native American Health Service Resident Rotation Program, the Skin Care for Developing Countries program, or an international grant.

The Women’s Dermatologic Society hosts 3 primary umbrella community outreach initiatives: Play Safe in the Sun, Coast-2-Coast, and the Transforming Interconnecting Project Program Women’s Shelter Initiative. From uplifting and educating individuals in women’s shelters about skin care, oral hygiene, self-care, nutrition, and social skills to providing complimentary skin cancer screenings, the Women’s Dermatologic Society provides easily accessible tool kits and syllabi to facilitate project composition and completion by its members.

Implement Residency Class Service-Learning Projects
Incoming dermatology residents are regularly encouraged to draft research proposals at the beginning of each academic year. Encouraging residency classes to work collectively on a dermatology service-learning project likely will increase resident camaraderie and project success while minimizing internal competition. In developing a service-learning proposal, residents should engage with community leaders and groups to best understand how to meet the skin health needs of underserved communities. The project should have clear objectives, benchmarks, and full support of the dermatology department. Short-term service-learning projects are completed when set goals are achieved, while sustainable projects continue with each new resident class.

Partner With Existing Community or Federally Funded Clinics
Establishing partnerships with free or federally funded health centers is a reliable way to increase service-learning opportunities in dermatology residency training. Personal malpractice carriers often include free clinic coverage, and most states offer limited liability or immunity for physicians who volunteer their professional services or subsidize malpractice insurance purchases.11 In light of the global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, teledermatology options should be explored alongside in-person services. Although logistics may vary based on institutional preference, the following are our recommendations for building community partnerships for dermatology service learning (Figure):

Action items to build community partnerships for dermatology service learning. AAD indicates American Academy of Dermatology; WDS, Women's Dermatologic Society.

• Secure departmental and institutional support. This includes requesting supplies, donations, and dermatopathology support

• Designate a resident or faculty community service champion to lead clinic correspondence and oversee operative logistics. This individual will establish a working partnership with the community clinic, assess the needs of the patient population, and manage the clinic schedule. The champion also will initiate and maintain open lines of communication with community providers for continuity of care. This partnership with community providers allows for shared resources and mutual learning

• Solicit residents to volunteer on a rotating schedule. Although some residents are fully committed to community service and health care justice, all residents need to participate in the service-learning program

• Participate in sustainable community engagement on a schedule that suits the needs of the community and takes into consideration resident and attending availability

Final Thoughts

Service learning in dermatology residency training is essential to improve access to equitable dermatologic care and train clinically competent dermatologists who have experience practicing in resource-limited settings. Service learning places cultural awareness and an understanding of socioeconomic determinants of health at the forefront.12 Some dermatology residency programs treat a high percentage of medically underserved patients; others have integrated service learning into dermatology rotations, and a few programs offer community engagement–focused residency tracks.13-16 Each dermatology program should evaluate its workforce, resources, and nearby underserved communities to strategically develop a program-specific service-learning program. Service-learning clinics often are the sole means by which patients from underserved communities receive dermatologic care.17 A commitment to service learning in dermatology residency programs will improve skin health equity and improve dermatology residency education.

References
  1. Cook NL, Hicks LS, O’Malley J, et al. Access to specialty care and medical services in community health centers. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26:1459-1468.
  2. Broaddus M, Aron-Dine A. Uninsured rate rose again in 2019, further eroding earlier progress. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities website. Published September 15, 2020. Accessed February 9, 2021. https://www.cbpp.org/research/health/uninsured-rate-rose-again-in-2019-further-eroding-earlier-progress
  3. Artiga S, Orgera K, Damico A. Changes in health coverage by race and ethnicity since the ACA, 2010-2018. Kaiser Family Foundation website. Published March 5, 2020. Accessed February 9, 2021. https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/issue-brief/changes-in-health-coverage-by-race-and-ethnicity-since-the-aca-2010-2018/
  4. Martinez MG. H.R.2010 - 103rd Congress (1993-1994): National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993. AmeriCorps website. Accessed November 24, 2020. https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/2010
  5. Gefter L, Merrell SB, Rosas LG, et al. Service-based learning for residents: a success for communities and medical education. Fam Med. 2015;47:803-806.
  6. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Dermatology. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website. Updated July 1, 2020. Accessed February 9, 2021. https://acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/080_Dermatology_2020.pdf?ver=2020-06-29-161626-133
  7. 7. Blanco G, Vasquez R, Nezafati K, et al. How residency programs can foster practice for the underserved. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:158-159.
  8. Darnell JS. Free clinics in the United States: a nationwide survey. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:946.
  9. Madray V, Ginjupalli S, Hashmi O, et al. Access to dermatology services at free medical clinics: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81:245-246.
  10. Shi L, Stevens GD. Vulnerability and unmet health care needs: the influence of multiple risk factors. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:148-154.
  11. Benrud L, Darrah J, Johnson A. Liability considerations for physician volunteers in the US. Virtual Mentor. 2010;12:207-212.
  12. Service-learning plays vital role in understanding social determinants of health. AAMC website. Published September 27, 2016. Accessed February 22, 2021. https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/service-learning-plays-vital-role-understanding-social-determinants-health
  13. Sheu J, Gonzalez E, Gaeta JM, et al. Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program–Harvard Dermatology collaboration: a service-learning model providing care for an underserved population. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6:789-790.
  14. Ojeda VD, Romero L, Ortiz A. A model for sustainable laser tattoo removal services for adult probationers. Int J Prison Health. 2019;15:308-315.
  15. Diversity & Community Track (Dermatology Diversity and Community Engagement residency position). Penn Medicine Dermatology website. Accessed February 9, 2021. https://dermatology.upenn.edu/residents/diversity-community-track/
  16. Duke Dermatology Diversity and Community Engagement residency position (1529080A2). Duke Dermatology website. Accessed February 9, 2021. https://dermatology.duke.edu/node/4742
  17. Buster KJ, Stevens EI, Elmets CA. Dermatologic health disparities. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30:53-59.
References
  1. Cook NL, Hicks LS, O’Malley J, et al. Access to specialty care and medical services in community health centers. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26:1459-1468.
  2. Broaddus M, Aron-Dine A. Uninsured rate rose again in 2019, further eroding earlier progress. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities website. Published September 15, 2020. Accessed February 9, 2021. https://www.cbpp.org/research/health/uninsured-rate-rose-again-in-2019-further-eroding-earlier-progress
  3. Artiga S, Orgera K, Damico A. Changes in health coverage by race and ethnicity since the ACA, 2010-2018. Kaiser Family Foundation website. Published March 5, 2020. Accessed February 9, 2021. https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/issue-brief/changes-in-health-coverage-by-race-and-ethnicity-since-the-aca-2010-2018/
  4. Martinez MG. H.R.2010 - 103rd Congress (1993-1994): National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993. AmeriCorps website. Accessed November 24, 2020. https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/2010
  5. Gefter L, Merrell SB, Rosas LG, et al. Service-based learning for residents: a success for communities and medical education. Fam Med. 2015;47:803-806.
  6. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Dermatology. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website. Updated July 1, 2020. Accessed February 9, 2021. https://acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/080_Dermatology_2020.pdf?ver=2020-06-29-161626-133
  7. 7. Blanco G, Vasquez R, Nezafati K, et al. How residency programs can foster practice for the underserved. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:158-159.
  8. Darnell JS. Free clinics in the United States: a nationwide survey. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:946.
  9. Madray V, Ginjupalli S, Hashmi O, et al. Access to dermatology services at free medical clinics: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81:245-246.
  10. Shi L, Stevens GD. Vulnerability and unmet health care needs: the influence of multiple risk factors. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:148-154.
  11. Benrud L, Darrah J, Johnson A. Liability considerations for physician volunteers in the US. Virtual Mentor. 2010;12:207-212.
  12. Service-learning plays vital role in understanding social determinants of health. AAMC website. Published September 27, 2016. Accessed February 22, 2021. https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/service-learning-plays-vital-role-understanding-social-determinants-health
  13. Sheu J, Gonzalez E, Gaeta JM, et al. Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program–Harvard Dermatology collaboration: a service-learning model providing care for an underserved population. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6:789-790.
  14. Ojeda VD, Romero L, Ortiz A. A model for sustainable laser tattoo removal services for adult probationers. Int J Prison Health. 2019;15:308-315.
  15. Diversity & Community Track (Dermatology Diversity and Community Engagement residency position). Penn Medicine Dermatology website. Accessed February 9, 2021. https://dermatology.upenn.edu/residents/diversity-community-track/
  16. Duke Dermatology Diversity and Community Engagement residency position (1529080A2). Duke Dermatology website. Accessed February 9, 2021. https://dermatology.duke.edu/node/4742
  17. Buster KJ, Stevens EI, Elmets CA. Dermatologic health disparities. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30:53-59.
Issue
cutis - 107(3)
Issue
cutis - 107(3)
Page Number
120-122
Page Number
120-122
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • In 2019, nearly 30 million Americans did not have health insurance. Dermatologists in the United States should be cognizant of the challenges faced by underserved patients when accessing dermatologic care.
  • Service learning is an educational approach that combines learning objectives with community service to provide a comprehensive learning experience, meet societal needs, and fulfill Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements.
  • Actionable methods to increase service learning in dermatology residency training include volunteering in community service programs offered by national dermatology organizations, implementing service-learning projects, and partnering with free and federally funded community practices.
  • Dermatology residents who participate in service learning will help increase access to equitable dermatologic care and experience practicing in settings with limited resources.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Article PDF Media

Bonds and Bridges: The Role of Social Capital in Building a More Diverse Dermatology Workforce

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 11/10/2020 - 13:43
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society

As our specialty seeks to address its lack of racial diversity, many dermatologists have answered recent calls to action.1,2 As we work toward dismantling systemic issues that have created pervasive inequality in our residency application review and interview processes, consideration also should be given to psychosocial issues that underrepresented-in-medicine (UIM) students face before their applications come to our attention. In this article, we explore how potential differences in the social capital of UIM and other disadvantaged dermatology residency applicants contribute to persistent homogeneity among dermatology training programs and the workforce.

The Theory of Capital

The concepts of economic, social, and cultural capital originate from the writings of social theorist Pierre Bourdieu.3 All 3 forms of capital are interconnected, and they relate to each other in ways that often facilitate social division and inequality. Economic capital denotes an individual’s economic resources or wealth, while cultural capital refers to the knowledge, behaviors, and skills that demonstrate his/her economic class (eg, communication style, table manners).3 Social capital refers to an individual’s interpersonal connections in personal and professional settings and can be subdivided into 3 categories: bonds, bridges, and linkages.4,5 Herein, we will focus on bonds and bridges.

It has been suggested that bonds are important for “getting by,” while bridges are critical for “getting ahead.”5 Bonds refer to close relationships within a community of people with shared characteristics, such as racial/ethnic identity and culture, access to information, and resources (eg, family, friends). These bonds provide trust, safety, and financial and emotional support; however, they are considered to be inward-looking and can promote exclusion and homogeneity.5

On the other hand, bridges refer to social relationships that extend outward beyond one’s close circle of family and friends to other people with shared interests and goals who may have different social or cultural identities (eg, professional colleagues). These bridges are considered to be outward-looking and provide many benefits to individuals and society. They link diverse individuals, which tends to increase tolerance and disrupt stereotypes, and they facilitate the sharing of ideas, information, and innovation. Additionally, bridges between individuals from different networks facilitate access to increased resources and opportunities for all parties.5

The 3 forms of capital are inextricably linked. For example, with economic capital, a child’s family can purchase access to a prestigious private high school, where he/she will gain valuable social capital through bridges with other students and their families. At this school, the child also will accumulate cultural capital that increases his/her sense of belonging in these circles. Subsequently, both the social and cultural capital accumulated at this private high school can be exchanged for economic capital via social networks, skills, values, and behaviors that facilitate entry into higher education and professional training. As such, these 3 forms of capital work together to continue social/class divisions, hierarchies, and ultimately inequality.

Impact of Social Capital in Pursuing a Medical Career

For medical students whose bonds (ie, close family, friends) include physicians or other health care professionals, the journey to studying medicine and entering their chosen specialty will be facilitated by financial security, valuable “inside information” about the application process, study skills, and even clinical guidance. Additionally, these students will have access to professional networks for mentorship, shadowing experiences, and other potential advantages. Furthermore, social capital is associated with higher self-esteem,6 which likely improves academic performance and wards off imposter syndrome in these students.

For medical students from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds or those whose inner circles do not include physicians or other health care professionals, accumulating the social and cultural capital needed to successfully navigate a medical career is more difficult. Although they may receive support and encouragement from family and friends, they will not have access to the same valuable information and connections that facilitate success; rather, they will have a further distance to travel, and this distance should be acknowledged in the residency application review process.

Acquiring Social Capital as a UIM Student

Despite the benefits of social and cultural capital, acquiring them takes a toll. For those UIM students who start life from a disadvantaged place, the accumulation of social capital does not come easily; rather, it demands effort and time that has the potential to detract from a student’s focus on the academic demands of medical education.7 Programs that attempt to improve disadvantaged students’ access to credible information, role models, and mentors can help lift some of the burden from the individual student’s shoulders. For example, studies have demonstrated the benefits of harnessing technology to enhance mentorship programs that increase social capital of disadvantaged populations.8-11 This approach already is in progress, bolstered by advances made in digital communications during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.12 Student-led networking groups that connect remotely have been shown to build social capital bonds and bridges that facilitate collaborative learning, relationship building, and information sharing.8-11 There are existing online UIM student networks that individual dermatologists, institutions, and national organizations can partner with to facilitate the construction of bridges between these UIM student groups and dermatologists who can provide accurate, high-yield information and professional networking; however, one limitation of this suggestion is the disparate access to technology in the UIM community.

Final Thoughts

It is important to note that assumptions should not be made about the level of economic, social, or cultural capital an individual possesses based on his/her race or ethnicity. Instead, mentors should attempt to be available to a diverse pool of students; take the time to get to know these students; and then provide the types of mentorship, information, exposure, and networking that each individual student needs. Another approach is to make a concerted effort to ensure that all students receive the same amount and quality of information about medical education and our specialty regardless of their level of economic, cultural, or social capital. Moreover, beyond the promotion of diversity through increasing numbers of UIM applicants, we should seek to reshape our specialty into a space that does not require students to subdue their existing diverse forms of capital but rather to bring these different perspectives and lived experiences to the table.13

References
  1. Bray JK, McMichael AJ, Huang WW, et al. Publication rates on the topic of racial and ethnic diversity in dermatology versus other specialties. Dermatol Online J. 2020;26:7.
  2. Pritchett EN, Pandya AG, Ferguson NN, et al. Diversity in dermatology: roadmap for improvement. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79:337-341.
  3. Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. In: Richardson J, ed. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood; 1986:241-258.
  4. Granovetter MS. The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol. 1973;78:1360-1380.
  5. Putnam RD. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. J Democracy. 1995;6:65-78.
  6. Han S. Longitudinal association between social capital and self-esteem: a matter of context. Psychiatry Research. 2015;226:340-346.
  7. Kirschling JM. Building social capital: leading and leveraging constituencies outside the college. J Nurs Educ. 2004;43:517-519.
  8. Radlick RL, Svedberg P, Nygren JM, et al. Digitally enhanced mentoring for immigrant youth social capital: protocol for a mixed methods pilot study and a randomized controlled trial [published online March 17, 2020]. JMIR Research Protocols. doi:10.2196/16472.
  9. Koh LC, Walker R, Wollersheim D, et al. I think someone is walking with me: the use of mobile phone for social capital development among women in four refugee communities. Int J Migration Health Social Care. 2018;14:411-424.
  10. Hartley A, Kassam AA. Social networking for learning in higher education: capitalising on social capital. ResearchGate website.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311097860_Social_Networking_for_Learning_in_Higher_Education_Capitalising_on_Social_Capital. Published November 2016. Accessed October 19, 2020.
  11. Zalon ML. Using technology to build community in professional associations. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2008;39:235-240.
  12. Stewart CR, Chernoff KA, Wildman HF, et al. Recommendations for medical student preparedness and equity for dermatology residency applications during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:E225-E226.
  13. Brosnan C, Southgate E, Outram S, et al. Experiences of medical students who are first in family to attend university. Med Educ. 2016;50:842-851.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Quartey and Ms. Edoror are from the University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore. Drs. Byrd and Okoye are from the Department of Dermatology, Howard University, Washington, DC.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Ginette A. Okoye, MD ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 106(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
242-244
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Quartey and Ms. Edoror are from the University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore. Drs. Byrd and Okoye are from the Department of Dermatology, Howard University, Washington, DC.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Ginette A. Okoye, MD ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Quartey and Ms. Edoror are from the University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore. Drs. Byrd and Okoye are from the Department of Dermatology, Howard University, Washington, DC.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Ginette A. Okoye, MD ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society

As our specialty seeks to address its lack of racial diversity, many dermatologists have answered recent calls to action.1,2 As we work toward dismantling systemic issues that have created pervasive inequality in our residency application review and interview processes, consideration also should be given to psychosocial issues that underrepresented-in-medicine (UIM) students face before their applications come to our attention. In this article, we explore how potential differences in the social capital of UIM and other disadvantaged dermatology residency applicants contribute to persistent homogeneity among dermatology training programs and the workforce.

The Theory of Capital

The concepts of economic, social, and cultural capital originate from the writings of social theorist Pierre Bourdieu.3 All 3 forms of capital are interconnected, and they relate to each other in ways that often facilitate social division and inequality. Economic capital denotes an individual’s economic resources or wealth, while cultural capital refers to the knowledge, behaviors, and skills that demonstrate his/her economic class (eg, communication style, table manners).3 Social capital refers to an individual’s interpersonal connections in personal and professional settings and can be subdivided into 3 categories: bonds, bridges, and linkages.4,5 Herein, we will focus on bonds and bridges.

It has been suggested that bonds are important for “getting by,” while bridges are critical for “getting ahead.”5 Bonds refer to close relationships within a community of people with shared characteristics, such as racial/ethnic identity and culture, access to information, and resources (eg, family, friends). These bonds provide trust, safety, and financial and emotional support; however, they are considered to be inward-looking and can promote exclusion and homogeneity.5

On the other hand, bridges refer to social relationships that extend outward beyond one’s close circle of family and friends to other people with shared interests and goals who may have different social or cultural identities (eg, professional colleagues). These bridges are considered to be outward-looking and provide many benefits to individuals and society. They link diverse individuals, which tends to increase tolerance and disrupt stereotypes, and they facilitate the sharing of ideas, information, and innovation. Additionally, bridges between individuals from different networks facilitate access to increased resources and opportunities for all parties.5

The 3 forms of capital are inextricably linked. For example, with economic capital, a child’s family can purchase access to a prestigious private high school, where he/she will gain valuable social capital through bridges with other students and their families. At this school, the child also will accumulate cultural capital that increases his/her sense of belonging in these circles. Subsequently, both the social and cultural capital accumulated at this private high school can be exchanged for economic capital via social networks, skills, values, and behaviors that facilitate entry into higher education and professional training. As such, these 3 forms of capital work together to continue social/class divisions, hierarchies, and ultimately inequality.

Impact of Social Capital in Pursuing a Medical Career

For medical students whose bonds (ie, close family, friends) include physicians or other health care professionals, the journey to studying medicine and entering their chosen specialty will be facilitated by financial security, valuable “inside information” about the application process, study skills, and even clinical guidance. Additionally, these students will have access to professional networks for mentorship, shadowing experiences, and other potential advantages. Furthermore, social capital is associated with higher self-esteem,6 which likely improves academic performance and wards off imposter syndrome in these students.

For medical students from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds or those whose inner circles do not include physicians or other health care professionals, accumulating the social and cultural capital needed to successfully navigate a medical career is more difficult. Although they may receive support and encouragement from family and friends, they will not have access to the same valuable information and connections that facilitate success; rather, they will have a further distance to travel, and this distance should be acknowledged in the residency application review process.

Acquiring Social Capital as a UIM Student

Despite the benefits of social and cultural capital, acquiring them takes a toll. For those UIM students who start life from a disadvantaged place, the accumulation of social capital does not come easily; rather, it demands effort and time that has the potential to detract from a student’s focus on the academic demands of medical education.7 Programs that attempt to improve disadvantaged students’ access to credible information, role models, and mentors can help lift some of the burden from the individual student’s shoulders. For example, studies have demonstrated the benefits of harnessing technology to enhance mentorship programs that increase social capital of disadvantaged populations.8-11 This approach already is in progress, bolstered by advances made in digital communications during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.12 Student-led networking groups that connect remotely have been shown to build social capital bonds and bridges that facilitate collaborative learning, relationship building, and information sharing.8-11 There are existing online UIM student networks that individual dermatologists, institutions, and national organizations can partner with to facilitate the construction of bridges between these UIM student groups and dermatologists who can provide accurate, high-yield information and professional networking; however, one limitation of this suggestion is the disparate access to technology in the UIM community.

Final Thoughts

It is important to note that assumptions should not be made about the level of economic, social, or cultural capital an individual possesses based on his/her race or ethnicity. Instead, mentors should attempt to be available to a diverse pool of students; take the time to get to know these students; and then provide the types of mentorship, information, exposure, and networking that each individual student needs. Another approach is to make a concerted effort to ensure that all students receive the same amount and quality of information about medical education and our specialty regardless of their level of economic, cultural, or social capital. Moreover, beyond the promotion of diversity through increasing numbers of UIM applicants, we should seek to reshape our specialty into a space that does not require students to subdue their existing diverse forms of capital but rather to bring these different perspectives and lived experiences to the table.13

As our specialty seeks to address its lack of racial diversity, many dermatologists have answered recent calls to action.1,2 As we work toward dismantling systemic issues that have created pervasive inequality in our residency application review and interview processes, consideration also should be given to psychosocial issues that underrepresented-in-medicine (UIM) students face before their applications come to our attention. In this article, we explore how potential differences in the social capital of UIM and other disadvantaged dermatology residency applicants contribute to persistent homogeneity among dermatology training programs and the workforce.

The Theory of Capital

The concepts of economic, social, and cultural capital originate from the writings of social theorist Pierre Bourdieu.3 All 3 forms of capital are interconnected, and they relate to each other in ways that often facilitate social division and inequality. Economic capital denotes an individual’s economic resources or wealth, while cultural capital refers to the knowledge, behaviors, and skills that demonstrate his/her economic class (eg, communication style, table manners).3 Social capital refers to an individual’s interpersonal connections in personal and professional settings and can be subdivided into 3 categories: bonds, bridges, and linkages.4,5 Herein, we will focus on bonds and bridges.

It has been suggested that bonds are important for “getting by,” while bridges are critical for “getting ahead.”5 Bonds refer to close relationships within a community of people with shared characteristics, such as racial/ethnic identity and culture, access to information, and resources (eg, family, friends). These bonds provide trust, safety, and financial and emotional support; however, they are considered to be inward-looking and can promote exclusion and homogeneity.5

On the other hand, bridges refer to social relationships that extend outward beyond one’s close circle of family and friends to other people with shared interests and goals who may have different social or cultural identities (eg, professional colleagues). These bridges are considered to be outward-looking and provide many benefits to individuals and society. They link diverse individuals, which tends to increase tolerance and disrupt stereotypes, and they facilitate the sharing of ideas, information, and innovation. Additionally, bridges between individuals from different networks facilitate access to increased resources and opportunities for all parties.5

The 3 forms of capital are inextricably linked. For example, with economic capital, a child’s family can purchase access to a prestigious private high school, where he/she will gain valuable social capital through bridges with other students and their families. At this school, the child also will accumulate cultural capital that increases his/her sense of belonging in these circles. Subsequently, both the social and cultural capital accumulated at this private high school can be exchanged for economic capital via social networks, skills, values, and behaviors that facilitate entry into higher education and professional training. As such, these 3 forms of capital work together to continue social/class divisions, hierarchies, and ultimately inequality.

Impact of Social Capital in Pursuing a Medical Career

For medical students whose bonds (ie, close family, friends) include physicians or other health care professionals, the journey to studying medicine and entering their chosen specialty will be facilitated by financial security, valuable “inside information” about the application process, study skills, and even clinical guidance. Additionally, these students will have access to professional networks for mentorship, shadowing experiences, and other potential advantages. Furthermore, social capital is associated with higher self-esteem,6 which likely improves academic performance and wards off imposter syndrome in these students.

For medical students from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds or those whose inner circles do not include physicians or other health care professionals, accumulating the social and cultural capital needed to successfully navigate a medical career is more difficult. Although they may receive support and encouragement from family and friends, they will not have access to the same valuable information and connections that facilitate success; rather, they will have a further distance to travel, and this distance should be acknowledged in the residency application review process.

Acquiring Social Capital as a UIM Student

Despite the benefits of social and cultural capital, acquiring them takes a toll. For those UIM students who start life from a disadvantaged place, the accumulation of social capital does not come easily; rather, it demands effort and time that has the potential to detract from a student’s focus on the academic demands of medical education.7 Programs that attempt to improve disadvantaged students’ access to credible information, role models, and mentors can help lift some of the burden from the individual student’s shoulders. For example, studies have demonstrated the benefits of harnessing technology to enhance mentorship programs that increase social capital of disadvantaged populations.8-11 This approach already is in progress, bolstered by advances made in digital communications during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.12 Student-led networking groups that connect remotely have been shown to build social capital bonds and bridges that facilitate collaborative learning, relationship building, and information sharing.8-11 There are existing online UIM student networks that individual dermatologists, institutions, and national organizations can partner with to facilitate the construction of bridges between these UIM student groups and dermatologists who can provide accurate, high-yield information and professional networking; however, one limitation of this suggestion is the disparate access to technology in the UIM community.

Final Thoughts

It is important to note that assumptions should not be made about the level of economic, social, or cultural capital an individual possesses based on his/her race or ethnicity. Instead, mentors should attempt to be available to a diverse pool of students; take the time to get to know these students; and then provide the types of mentorship, information, exposure, and networking that each individual student needs. Another approach is to make a concerted effort to ensure that all students receive the same amount and quality of information about medical education and our specialty regardless of their level of economic, cultural, or social capital. Moreover, beyond the promotion of diversity through increasing numbers of UIM applicants, we should seek to reshape our specialty into a space that does not require students to subdue their existing diverse forms of capital but rather to bring these different perspectives and lived experiences to the table.13

References
  1. Bray JK, McMichael AJ, Huang WW, et al. Publication rates on the topic of racial and ethnic diversity in dermatology versus other specialties. Dermatol Online J. 2020;26:7.
  2. Pritchett EN, Pandya AG, Ferguson NN, et al. Diversity in dermatology: roadmap for improvement. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79:337-341.
  3. Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. In: Richardson J, ed. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood; 1986:241-258.
  4. Granovetter MS. The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol. 1973;78:1360-1380.
  5. Putnam RD. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. J Democracy. 1995;6:65-78.
  6. Han S. Longitudinal association between social capital and self-esteem: a matter of context. Psychiatry Research. 2015;226:340-346.
  7. Kirschling JM. Building social capital: leading and leveraging constituencies outside the college. J Nurs Educ. 2004;43:517-519.
  8. Radlick RL, Svedberg P, Nygren JM, et al. Digitally enhanced mentoring for immigrant youth social capital: protocol for a mixed methods pilot study and a randomized controlled trial [published online March 17, 2020]. JMIR Research Protocols. doi:10.2196/16472.
  9. Koh LC, Walker R, Wollersheim D, et al. I think someone is walking with me: the use of mobile phone for social capital development among women in four refugee communities. Int J Migration Health Social Care. 2018;14:411-424.
  10. Hartley A, Kassam AA. Social networking for learning in higher education: capitalising on social capital. ResearchGate website.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311097860_Social_Networking_for_Learning_in_Higher_Education_Capitalising_on_Social_Capital. Published November 2016. Accessed October 19, 2020.
  11. Zalon ML. Using technology to build community in professional associations. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2008;39:235-240.
  12. Stewart CR, Chernoff KA, Wildman HF, et al. Recommendations for medical student preparedness and equity for dermatology residency applications during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:E225-E226.
  13. Brosnan C, Southgate E, Outram S, et al. Experiences of medical students who are first in family to attend university. Med Educ. 2016;50:842-851.
References
  1. Bray JK, McMichael AJ, Huang WW, et al. Publication rates on the topic of racial and ethnic diversity in dermatology versus other specialties. Dermatol Online J. 2020;26:7.
  2. Pritchett EN, Pandya AG, Ferguson NN, et al. Diversity in dermatology: roadmap for improvement. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79:337-341.
  3. Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. In: Richardson J, ed. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood; 1986:241-258.
  4. Granovetter MS. The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol. 1973;78:1360-1380.
  5. Putnam RD. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. J Democracy. 1995;6:65-78.
  6. Han S. Longitudinal association between social capital and self-esteem: a matter of context. Psychiatry Research. 2015;226:340-346.
  7. Kirschling JM. Building social capital: leading and leveraging constituencies outside the college. J Nurs Educ. 2004;43:517-519.
  8. Radlick RL, Svedberg P, Nygren JM, et al. Digitally enhanced mentoring for immigrant youth social capital: protocol for a mixed methods pilot study and a randomized controlled trial [published online March 17, 2020]. JMIR Research Protocols. doi:10.2196/16472.
  9. Koh LC, Walker R, Wollersheim D, et al. I think someone is walking with me: the use of mobile phone for social capital development among women in four refugee communities. Int J Migration Health Social Care. 2018;14:411-424.
  10. Hartley A, Kassam AA. Social networking for learning in higher education: capitalising on social capital. ResearchGate website.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311097860_Social_Networking_for_Learning_in_Higher_Education_Capitalising_on_Social_Capital. Published November 2016. Accessed October 19, 2020.
  11. Zalon ML. Using technology to build community in professional associations. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2008;39:235-240.
  12. Stewart CR, Chernoff KA, Wildman HF, et al. Recommendations for medical student preparedness and equity for dermatology residency applications during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:E225-E226.
  13. Brosnan C, Southgate E, Outram S, et al. Experiences of medical students who are first in family to attend university. Med Educ. 2016;50:842-851.
Issue
Cutis - 106(5)
Issue
Cutis - 106(5)
Page Number
242-244
Page Number
242-244
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Achieving diversity in the field of dermatology will require a concerted effort to equalize access to mentorship, information, exposure, and networking for students of all backgrounds.
  • Valuing diverse forms of capital in applicants ultimately will strengthen the dermatology workforce through inclusion of various lived experiences and perspectives.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Article PDF Media

How to Obtain a Dermatology Residency: A Guide Targeted to Underrepresented in Medicine Medical Students

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 10/29/2020 - 14:43
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society

There has been increasing attention focused on the lack of diversity within dermatology academic and residency programs.1-6 Several factors have been identified as contributing to this narrow pipeline of qualified applicants, including lack of mentorship, delayed exposure to the field, implicit bias, and lack of an overall holistic review of applications with overemphasis on board scores.1,5 In an effort to provide guidance to underrepresented in medicine (UIM) students who are interested in dermatology, the Skin of Color Society (SOCS) has created a detailed, step-by-step guide on how to obtain a position in a dermatology residency program,7 which was modeled after a similar resource created by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.8 Here, we highlight the main SOCS recommendations to help guide medical students through a systematic approach to becoming successful applicants for dermatology residency.

Start Early

Competitive fields such as dermatology require intentional efforts starting at the beginning of medical school. Regardless of what specialty is right for you, begin by constructing a well-rounded application for residency immediately. Start by shadowing dermatologists and attending Grand Rounds held in your institution’s dermatology department to ensure that this field is right for you. Students are encouraged to meet with academic advisors and upperclassmen to seek guidance on gaining early exposure to dermatology at their home institutions (or nearby programs) during their first year. As a platform for learning about community-based dermatology activities, join your school’s Dermatology Interest Group, keeping in mind that an executive position in such a group can help foster relationships with faculty and residents of the dermatology department. A long-term commitment to community service also contributes to your depth as an applicant. Getting involved early helps students uncover health disparities in medicine and allows time to formulate ideas to implement change. Forming a well-rounded application mandates maintaining good academic standing, and students should prioritize mastering the curriculum, excelling in clinical rotations, and studying for the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE).

Choose a Mentor

The summer between your first and second years of medical school is an opportune time to explore research opportunities. Students successfully complete research by taking ownership of a project, efficiently meeting deadlines, maintaining contact with research mentors by quickly responding to emails, and producing quality work. Research outside of dermatology also is valued. Research mentors often provide future letters of recommendation, so commit to doing an outstanding job. For those finding it difficult to locate a mentor, consider searching the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD)(https://www.aad.org/mentorship/) or SOCS (https://skinofcolorsociety.org/) websites. The AAD has an established Diversity Mentorship Program (https://www.aad.org/member/career/volunteer/diversity-mentorship) that provides members with direct guidance from dermatologists for 4 weeks. Students use this time to conduct research, learn more about the specialty, and foster a relationship with their mentor. Students can apply any year of medical school; however, the typical awardee usually is a third-year or fourth-year student. The AAD may provide a stipend to help offset expenses.

Prepare for Boards

Second year is a continuation of the agenda set forth in first year, now with the focus shifting toward board preparation and excelling in clinical core didactics and rotations. According to data from the 2018 National Resident Matching Program,9 the mean USMLE Step 1 score for US allopathic senior medical students who matched into dermatology was 249 compared to 241 who did not match into dermatology. However, the mean score is just that—a mean—and people have matched with lower scores. Do not be intimidated by this number; instead, be driven to commit the time and resources to master the content and do your personal best on the USMLE Step examinations. Given the shift in some programs for earlier clinical exposure and postponement of boards until the third year, the recommendations in this timeline can be catered to fit a medical student’s specific situation.

Build Your Application

The third year of medical school is a busy year. Prepare for third-year clinical rotations by speaking with upperclassmen and clinical preceptors as you progress through your rotations. Evaluations and recommendations are weighed heavily by residency program directors, as this information is used to ascertain your clinical abilities. Seek feedback from your preceptors early and often with a sincere attempt to integrate suggested improvements. Schedule a dermatology rotation at your home institution after completing the core rotations. Although they are not required, applicants may complete away rotations early in their fourth year; the application period for visiting student learning opportunities typically opens April 1 of the third year, if not earlier. Free resources are available to help prepare for your dermatology rotations. Start by reviewing the Basic Dermatology Curriculum on the AAD website (https://www.aad.org/member/education/residents/bdc). Make contributions to your Electronic Residency Application Service account by thinking about letter writers, your personal statement, scheduling the USMLE Step 2, and completing any pending publications.

Interviewing for Residency

During your fourth year of medical school, you will be completing dermatology rotations, submitting your applications through the Electronic Residency Application Service, and interviewing with residency programs. When deciding which programs to apply to, consider referencing the American Medical Association Residency and Fellowship Database (https://freida.ama-assn.org/Freida/#/). Also keep in mind that, depending on your competitiveness, you should expect to receive 1 interview for every 10 programs you apply to, thus the application process can be quite costly. It is highly encouraged that you ask for letters of recommendation prior to August 15 and that you submit your applications by September 15. Complete mock interviews with a mentor and research commonly asked questions. Prior to your interview day, you want to spend time researching the program, browsing faculty publications, and reviewing your application. Dress in a comfortable suit, shoes, and minimal accessories; arrive early knowing that your interview begins even before you meet your interviewer, so treat everyone you meet with respect. Refrain from speaking to anyone in a casual way and have questions prepared to ask each interviewer. After your interviews, be sure to write thank you notes or emails if a program does not specifically discourage postinterview communication. Continuous efforts will improve your success in obtaining a dermatology residency position.

Final Thoughts

Recent articles have underscored and emphasized the importance of diversity in our field, with a call to action to find meaningful and overdue solutions.2,6 We acknowledge the important role that mentors play in providing timely, honest, and encouraging guidance to UIM students interested in careers in dermatology. We hope to provide readily available and detailed guidance to these students on how they can present themselves as excellent and qualified applicants through this summary and other platforms.

Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the members of the SOCS Diversity Task Force for their assistance in creating the original guide.

References
  1. Chen A, Shinkai K. Rethinking how we select dermatology applicants—turning the tide. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:259-260.
  2. Granstein RD, Cornelius L, Shinkai K. Diversity in dermatology—a call for action. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:499-500.
  3. Imadojemu S, James WD. Increasing African American representation in dermatology. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:15-16.
  4. Pandya AG, Alexis AF, Berger TG, et al. Increasing racial and ethnic diversity in dermatology: a call to action. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:584-587.
  5. Pritchett EN, Pandya AG, Ferguson NN, et al. Diversity in dermatology: roadmap for improvement. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79:337-341.
  6. Taylor SC. Meeting the unique dermatologic needs of black patients [published online August 21, 2019]. JAMA Dermatol. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1963.
  7. Skin of Color Society. How to obtain a position in a dermatology residency program. https://skinofcolorsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/How-to-Obtain-a-Position-in-a-Dermatology-Residency-Program-10-08-2019.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2020.
  8. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. How to obtain an orthopedic residency by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://www.aaos.org/globalassets/about/diversity/how-to-obtain-an-orthopaedic-residency.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2020.
  9. Results and Data—2018 Main Residency Match. Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program; 2018. Published April 2018. Accessed June 24, 2020.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Rorex is from Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio. Dr. Ferguson is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City. Dr. Kundu is from the Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Roopal V. Kundu, MD, Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 North St Clair St, Ste 1600, Chicago, IL 60611 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 106(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
12-13
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Rorex is from Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio. Dr. Ferguson is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City. Dr. Kundu is from the Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Roopal V. Kundu, MD, Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 North St Clair St, Ste 1600, Chicago, IL 60611 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Rorex is from Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio. Dr. Ferguson is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City. Dr. Kundu is from the Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Roopal V. Kundu, MD, Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 North St Clair St, Ste 1600, Chicago, IL 60611 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society
In Collaboration With the Skin of Color Society

There has been increasing attention focused on the lack of diversity within dermatology academic and residency programs.1-6 Several factors have been identified as contributing to this narrow pipeline of qualified applicants, including lack of mentorship, delayed exposure to the field, implicit bias, and lack of an overall holistic review of applications with overemphasis on board scores.1,5 In an effort to provide guidance to underrepresented in medicine (UIM) students who are interested in dermatology, the Skin of Color Society (SOCS) has created a detailed, step-by-step guide on how to obtain a position in a dermatology residency program,7 which was modeled after a similar resource created by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.8 Here, we highlight the main SOCS recommendations to help guide medical students through a systematic approach to becoming successful applicants for dermatology residency.

Start Early

Competitive fields such as dermatology require intentional efforts starting at the beginning of medical school. Regardless of what specialty is right for you, begin by constructing a well-rounded application for residency immediately. Start by shadowing dermatologists and attending Grand Rounds held in your institution’s dermatology department to ensure that this field is right for you. Students are encouraged to meet with academic advisors and upperclassmen to seek guidance on gaining early exposure to dermatology at their home institutions (or nearby programs) during their first year. As a platform for learning about community-based dermatology activities, join your school’s Dermatology Interest Group, keeping in mind that an executive position in such a group can help foster relationships with faculty and residents of the dermatology department. A long-term commitment to community service also contributes to your depth as an applicant. Getting involved early helps students uncover health disparities in medicine and allows time to formulate ideas to implement change. Forming a well-rounded application mandates maintaining good academic standing, and students should prioritize mastering the curriculum, excelling in clinical rotations, and studying for the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE).

Choose a Mentor

The summer between your first and second years of medical school is an opportune time to explore research opportunities. Students successfully complete research by taking ownership of a project, efficiently meeting deadlines, maintaining contact with research mentors by quickly responding to emails, and producing quality work. Research outside of dermatology also is valued. Research mentors often provide future letters of recommendation, so commit to doing an outstanding job. For those finding it difficult to locate a mentor, consider searching the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD)(https://www.aad.org/mentorship/) or SOCS (https://skinofcolorsociety.org/) websites. The AAD has an established Diversity Mentorship Program (https://www.aad.org/member/career/volunteer/diversity-mentorship) that provides members with direct guidance from dermatologists for 4 weeks. Students use this time to conduct research, learn more about the specialty, and foster a relationship with their mentor. Students can apply any year of medical school; however, the typical awardee usually is a third-year or fourth-year student. The AAD may provide a stipend to help offset expenses.

Prepare for Boards

Second year is a continuation of the agenda set forth in first year, now with the focus shifting toward board preparation and excelling in clinical core didactics and rotations. According to data from the 2018 National Resident Matching Program,9 the mean USMLE Step 1 score for US allopathic senior medical students who matched into dermatology was 249 compared to 241 who did not match into dermatology. However, the mean score is just that—a mean—and people have matched with lower scores. Do not be intimidated by this number; instead, be driven to commit the time and resources to master the content and do your personal best on the USMLE Step examinations. Given the shift in some programs for earlier clinical exposure and postponement of boards until the third year, the recommendations in this timeline can be catered to fit a medical student’s specific situation.

Build Your Application

The third year of medical school is a busy year. Prepare for third-year clinical rotations by speaking with upperclassmen and clinical preceptors as you progress through your rotations. Evaluations and recommendations are weighed heavily by residency program directors, as this information is used to ascertain your clinical abilities. Seek feedback from your preceptors early and often with a sincere attempt to integrate suggested improvements. Schedule a dermatology rotation at your home institution after completing the core rotations. Although they are not required, applicants may complete away rotations early in their fourth year; the application period for visiting student learning opportunities typically opens April 1 of the third year, if not earlier. Free resources are available to help prepare for your dermatology rotations. Start by reviewing the Basic Dermatology Curriculum on the AAD website (https://www.aad.org/member/education/residents/bdc). Make contributions to your Electronic Residency Application Service account by thinking about letter writers, your personal statement, scheduling the USMLE Step 2, and completing any pending publications.

Interviewing for Residency

During your fourth year of medical school, you will be completing dermatology rotations, submitting your applications through the Electronic Residency Application Service, and interviewing with residency programs. When deciding which programs to apply to, consider referencing the American Medical Association Residency and Fellowship Database (https://freida.ama-assn.org/Freida/#/). Also keep in mind that, depending on your competitiveness, you should expect to receive 1 interview for every 10 programs you apply to, thus the application process can be quite costly. It is highly encouraged that you ask for letters of recommendation prior to August 15 and that you submit your applications by September 15. Complete mock interviews with a mentor and research commonly asked questions. Prior to your interview day, you want to spend time researching the program, browsing faculty publications, and reviewing your application. Dress in a comfortable suit, shoes, and minimal accessories; arrive early knowing that your interview begins even before you meet your interviewer, so treat everyone you meet with respect. Refrain from speaking to anyone in a casual way and have questions prepared to ask each interviewer. After your interviews, be sure to write thank you notes or emails if a program does not specifically discourage postinterview communication. Continuous efforts will improve your success in obtaining a dermatology residency position.

Final Thoughts

Recent articles have underscored and emphasized the importance of diversity in our field, with a call to action to find meaningful and overdue solutions.2,6 We acknowledge the important role that mentors play in providing timely, honest, and encouraging guidance to UIM students interested in careers in dermatology. We hope to provide readily available and detailed guidance to these students on how they can present themselves as excellent and qualified applicants through this summary and other platforms.

Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the members of the SOCS Diversity Task Force for their assistance in creating the original guide.

There has been increasing attention focused on the lack of diversity within dermatology academic and residency programs.1-6 Several factors have been identified as contributing to this narrow pipeline of qualified applicants, including lack of mentorship, delayed exposure to the field, implicit bias, and lack of an overall holistic review of applications with overemphasis on board scores.1,5 In an effort to provide guidance to underrepresented in medicine (UIM) students who are interested in dermatology, the Skin of Color Society (SOCS) has created a detailed, step-by-step guide on how to obtain a position in a dermatology residency program,7 which was modeled after a similar resource created by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.8 Here, we highlight the main SOCS recommendations to help guide medical students through a systematic approach to becoming successful applicants for dermatology residency.

Start Early

Competitive fields such as dermatology require intentional efforts starting at the beginning of medical school. Regardless of what specialty is right for you, begin by constructing a well-rounded application for residency immediately. Start by shadowing dermatologists and attending Grand Rounds held in your institution’s dermatology department to ensure that this field is right for you. Students are encouraged to meet with academic advisors and upperclassmen to seek guidance on gaining early exposure to dermatology at their home institutions (or nearby programs) during their first year. As a platform for learning about community-based dermatology activities, join your school’s Dermatology Interest Group, keeping in mind that an executive position in such a group can help foster relationships with faculty and residents of the dermatology department. A long-term commitment to community service also contributes to your depth as an applicant. Getting involved early helps students uncover health disparities in medicine and allows time to formulate ideas to implement change. Forming a well-rounded application mandates maintaining good academic standing, and students should prioritize mastering the curriculum, excelling in clinical rotations, and studying for the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE).

Choose a Mentor

The summer between your first and second years of medical school is an opportune time to explore research opportunities. Students successfully complete research by taking ownership of a project, efficiently meeting deadlines, maintaining contact with research mentors by quickly responding to emails, and producing quality work. Research outside of dermatology also is valued. Research mentors often provide future letters of recommendation, so commit to doing an outstanding job. For those finding it difficult to locate a mentor, consider searching the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD)(https://www.aad.org/mentorship/) or SOCS (https://skinofcolorsociety.org/) websites. The AAD has an established Diversity Mentorship Program (https://www.aad.org/member/career/volunteer/diversity-mentorship) that provides members with direct guidance from dermatologists for 4 weeks. Students use this time to conduct research, learn more about the specialty, and foster a relationship with their mentor. Students can apply any year of medical school; however, the typical awardee usually is a third-year or fourth-year student. The AAD may provide a stipend to help offset expenses.

Prepare for Boards

Second year is a continuation of the agenda set forth in first year, now with the focus shifting toward board preparation and excelling in clinical core didactics and rotations. According to data from the 2018 National Resident Matching Program,9 the mean USMLE Step 1 score for US allopathic senior medical students who matched into dermatology was 249 compared to 241 who did not match into dermatology. However, the mean score is just that—a mean—and people have matched with lower scores. Do not be intimidated by this number; instead, be driven to commit the time and resources to master the content and do your personal best on the USMLE Step examinations. Given the shift in some programs for earlier clinical exposure and postponement of boards until the third year, the recommendations in this timeline can be catered to fit a medical student’s specific situation.

Build Your Application

The third year of medical school is a busy year. Prepare for third-year clinical rotations by speaking with upperclassmen and clinical preceptors as you progress through your rotations. Evaluations and recommendations are weighed heavily by residency program directors, as this information is used to ascertain your clinical abilities. Seek feedback from your preceptors early and often with a sincere attempt to integrate suggested improvements. Schedule a dermatology rotation at your home institution after completing the core rotations. Although they are not required, applicants may complete away rotations early in their fourth year; the application period for visiting student learning opportunities typically opens April 1 of the third year, if not earlier. Free resources are available to help prepare for your dermatology rotations. Start by reviewing the Basic Dermatology Curriculum on the AAD website (https://www.aad.org/member/education/residents/bdc). Make contributions to your Electronic Residency Application Service account by thinking about letter writers, your personal statement, scheduling the USMLE Step 2, and completing any pending publications.

Interviewing for Residency

During your fourth year of medical school, you will be completing dermatology rotations, submitting your applications through the Electronic Residency Application Service, and interviewing with residency programs. When deciding which programs to apply to, consider referencing the American Medical Association Residency and Fellowship Database (https://freida.ama-assn.org/Freida/#/). Also keep in mind that, depending on your competitiveness, you should expect to receive 1 interview for every 10 programs you apply to, thus the application process can be quite costly. It is highly encouraged that you ask for letters of recommendation prior to August 15 and that you submit your applications by September 15. Complete mock interviews with a mentor and research commonly asked questions. Prior to your interview day, you want to spend time researching the program, browsing faculty publications, and reviewing your application. Dress in a comfortable suit, shoes, and minimal accessories; arrive early knowing that your interview begins even before you meet your interviewer, so treat everyone you meet with respect. Refrain from speaking to anyone in a casual way and have questions prepared to ask each interviewer. After your interviews, be sure to write thank you notes or emails if a program does not specifically discourage postinterview communication. Continuous efforts will improve your success in obtaining a dermatology residency position.

Final Thoughts

Recent articles have underscored and emphasized the importance of diversity in our field, with a call to action to find meaningful and overdue solutions.2,6 We acknowledge the important role that mentors play in providing timely, honest, and encouraging guidance to UIM students interested in careers in dermatology. We hope to provide readily available and detailed guidance to these students on how they can present themselves as excellent and qualified applicants through this summary and other platforms.

Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the members of the SOCS Diversity Task Force for their assistance in creating the original guide.

References
  1. Chen A, Shinkai K. Rethinking how we select dermatology applicants—turning the tide. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:259-260.
  2. Granstein RD, Cornelius L, Shinkai K. Diversity in dermatology—a call for action. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:499-500.
  3. Imadojemu S, James WD. Increasing African American representation in dermatology. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:15-16.
  4. Pandya AG, Alexis AF, Berger TG, et al. Increasing racial and ethnic diversity in dermatology: a call to action. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:584-587.
  5. Pritchett EN, Pandya AG, Ferguson NN, et al. Diversity in dermatology: roadmap for improvement. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79:337-341.
  6. Taylor SC. Meeting the unique dermatologic needs of black patients [published online August 21, 2019]. JAMA Dermatol. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1963.
  7. Skin of Color Society. How to obtain a position in a dermatology residency program. https://skinofcolorsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/How-to-Obtain-a-Position-in-a-Dermatology-Residency-Program-10-08-2019.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2020.
  8. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. How to obtain an orthopedic residency by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://www.aaos.org/globalassets/about/diversity/how-to-obtain-an-orthopaedic-residency.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2020.
  9. Results and Data—2018 Main Residency Match. Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program; 2018. Published April 2018. Accessed June 24, 2020.
References
  1. Chen A, Shinkai K. Rethinking how we select dermatology applicants—turning the tide. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:259-260.
  2. Granstein RD, Cornelius L, Shinkai K. Diversity in dermatology—a call for action. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:499-500.
  3. Imadojemu S, James WD. Increasing African American representation in dermatology. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:15-16.
  4. Pandya AG, Alexis AF, Berger TG, et al. Increasing racial and ethnic diversity in dermatology: a call to action. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:584-587.
  5. Pritchett EN, Pandya AG, Ferguson NN, et al. Diversity in dermatology: roadmap for improvement. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79:337-341.
  6. Taylor SC. Meeting the unique dermatologic needs of black patients [published online August 21, 2019]. JAMA Dermatol. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1963.
  7. Skin of Color Society. How to obtain a position in a dermatology residency program. https://skinofcolorsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/How-to-Obtain-a-Position-in-a-Dermatology-Residency-Program-10-08-2019.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2020.
  8. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. How to obtain an orthopedic residency by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://www.aaos.org/globalassets/about/diversity/how-to-obtain-an-orthopaedic-residency.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2020.
  9. Results and Data—2018 Main Residency Match. Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program; 2018. Published April 2018. Accessed June 24, 2020.
Issue
Cutis - 106(1)
Issue
Cutis - 106(1)
Page Number
12-13
Page Number
12-13
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Students interested in dermatology are encouraged to seek mentorship, strive for their academic best, and maintain their unique personal interests that make them a well-rounded applicant.
  • Increasing diversity in dermatology requires initiative from students as well as dermatologists who are willing to mentor and sponsor.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Article PDF Media