HIV

Oncologists should consider testing all patients with newly diagnosed cancers for infection with the hepatitis B and C viruses, a multicenter team has recommended.

A prospective study of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and HIV infections among 3,051 patients with newly diagnosed cancers showed that 6.5% of patients tested positive for previous HBV and 0.6% had chronic HBV infection. In addition, 2.4% of patients were positive for HCV, and 1.1% for HIV infections, reported Scott D. Ramsey, MD, PhD, from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and colleagues.

“Many patients had no known risk factors for infection, suggesting that current risk-based models for screening may be insufficient. Thus, we believe our results warrant consideration of universal testing of patients with newly diagnosed cancer for HBV and HCV infection, particularly if such an approach is shown to be cost effective,” they wrote in JAMA Oncology.

The investigators noted that patients with undiagnosed hepatitis and/or HIV infections could transmit them to unsuspecting caregivers, adding that “with effective treatments available, not screening for these viruses misses an opportunity to reduce future morbidity associated with these infections and to avoid viral reactivation during treatment, with resulting morbidity and mortality.”

To estimate the prevalence of the infections in patients with newly diagnosed cancers, investigators looked at a cohort of 3,051 patients with a cancer diagnosis made within the previous 120 days at nine academic medical centers and nine community oncology centers representing a total of 41 cancer clinics affiliated with the SWOG Cancer Research Network (formerly the Southwest Oncology Group).

The median patient age was 60.6 years. Female patients constitute 60.4% of the sample; 18.1% were black, and 18.3% were of Hispanic heritage.

Of 3,050 patients for whom HBV testing results were available, 6.5% (197) were positive for previous HBV infection, compared with an estimated U.S. population prevalence of 4.7%. In addition, 0.6% (19 patients) were found to have chronic HBV, compared with an estimated 0.3% US population prevalence.

HCV infections were detected in 2.4% (71 of 2990 patients), compared with an estimated population prevalence of 1.3%, and HIV infections were detected in 1.1%, compared with a background estimated population prevalence of 0.3%.

In all, 32 patients were diagnosed with viral infections by testing performed for the study, including 8 patients with chronic HBV, 22 with HCV, and 2 with HIV.

Additionally, the authors found that 4 patients with chronic HBV, 23 with HCV, and 7 with HIV had no identifiable risk factors.

The highest prevalence of infections occurred among patients with liver cancer, nonliver and noncolorectal cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, head and neck cancers, lung cancers, and prostate cancer. A finding of viral positivity changed the treatment plan in only 8% of all infected patients, however.

“Given that most HIV-infected patients in our study knew their viral status, the yield of universal HIV testing among patients with newly diagnosed cancer may likely be low. Although age-directed screening is recommended for HIV and HCV, uptake rates in primary care are variable and low overall,” Dr. Ramsey and his colleagues wrote.

The study was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Ramsey and several co-authors reported receiving NCI grants, and multiple co-authors reported grants and/or consulting fees from various companies.

SOURCE: Ramsey SD et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jan 17. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6437.

Oncologists should consider testing all patients with newly diagnosed cancers for infection with the hepatitis B and C viruses, a multicenter team has recommended.

A prospective study of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and HIV infections among 3,051 patients with newly diagnosed cancers showed that 6.5% of patients tested positive for previous HBV and 0.6% had chronic HBV infection. In addition, 2.4% of patients were positive for HCV, and 1.1% for HIV infections, reported Scott D. Ramsey, MD, PhD, from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and colleagues.

“Many patients had no known risk factors for infection, suggesting that current risk-based models for screening may be insufficient. Thus, we believe our results warrant consideration of universal testing of patients with newly diagnosed cancer for HBV and HCV infection, particularly if such an approach is shown to be cost effective,” they wrote in JAMA Oncology.

The investigators noted that patients with undiagnosed hepatitis and/or HIV infections could transmit them to unsuspecting caregivers, adding that “with effective treatments available, not screening for these viruses misses an opportunity to reduce future morbidity associated with these infections and to avoid viral reactivation during treatment, with resulting morbidity and mortality.”

To estimate the prevalence of the infections in patients with newly diagnosed cancers, investigators looked at a cohort of 3,051 patients with a cancer diagnosis made within the previous 120 days at nine academic medical centers and nine community oncology centers representing a total of 41 cancer clinics affiliated with the SWOG Cancer Research Network (formerly the Southwest Oncology Group).

The median patient age was 60.6 years. Female patients constitute 60.4% of the sample; 18.1% were black, and 18.3% were of Hispanic heritage.

Of 3,050 patients for whom HBV testing results were available, 6.5% (197) were positive for previous HBV infection, compared with an estimated U.S. population prevalence of 4.7%. In addition, 0.6% (19 patients) were found to have chronic HBV, compared with an estimated 0.3% US population prevalence.

HCV infections were detected in 2.4% (71 of 2990 patients), compared with an estimated population prevalence of 1.3%, and HIV infections were detected in 1.1%, compared with a background estimated population prevalence of 0.3%.

In all, 32 patients were diagnosed with viral infections by testing performed for the study, including 8 patients with chronic HBV, 22 with HCV, and 2 with HIV.

Additionally, the authors found that 4 patients with chronic HBV, 23 with HCV, and 7 with HIV had no identifiable risk factors.

The highest prevalence of infections occurred among patients with liver cancer, nonliver and noncolorectal cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, head and neck cancers, lung cancers, and prostate cancer. A finding of viral positivity changed the treatment plan in only 8% of all infected patients, however.

“Given that most HIV-infected patients in our study knew their viral status, the yield of universal HIV testing among patients with newly diagnosed cancer may likely be low. Although age-directed screening is recommended for HIV and HCV, uptake rates in primary care are variable and low overall,” Dr. Ramsey and his colleagues wrote.

The study was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Ramsey and several co-authors reported receiving NCI grants, and multiple co-authors reported grants and/or consulting fees from various companies.

SOURCE: Ramsey SD et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jan 17. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6437.

Oncologists should consider testing all patients with newly diagnosed cancers for infection with the hepatitis B and C viruses, a multicenter team has recommended.

A prospective study of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and HIV infections among 3,051 patients with newly diagnosed cancers showed that 6.5% of patients tested positive for previous HBV and 0.6% had chronic HBV infection. In addition, 2.4% of patients were positive for HCV, and 1.1% for HIV infections, reported Scott D. Ramsey, MD, PhD, from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and colleagues.

“Many patients had no known risk factors for infection, suggesting that current risk-based models for screening may be insufficient. Thus, we believe our results warrant consideration of universal testing of patients with newly diagnosed cancer for HBV and HCV infection, particularly if such an approach is shown to be cost effective,” they wrote in JAMA Oncology.

The investigators noted that patients with undiagnosed hepatitis and/or HIV infections could transmit them to unsuspecting caregivers, adding that “with effective treatments available, not screening for these viruses misses an opportunity to reduce future morbidity associated with these infections and to avoid viral reactivation during treatment, with resulting morbidity and mortality.”

To estimate the prevalence of the infections in patients with newly diagnosed cancers, investigators looked at a cohort of 3,051 patients with a cancer diagnosis made within the previous 120 days at nine academic medical centers and nine community oncology centers representing a total of 41 cancer clinics affiliated with the SWOG Cancer Research Network (formerly the Southwest Oncology Group).

The median patient age was 60.6 years. Female patients constitute 60.4% of the sample; 18.1% were black, and 18.3% were of Hispanic heritage.

Of 3,050 patients for whom HBV testing results were available, 6.5% (197) were positive for previous HBV infection, compared with an estimated U.S. population prevalence of 4.7%. In addition, 0.6% (19 patients) were found to have chronic HBV, compared with an estimated 0.3% US population prevalence.

HCV infections were detected in 2.4% (71 of 2990 patients), compared with an estimated population prevalence of 1.3%, and HIV infections were detected in 1.1%, compared with a background estimated population prevalence of 0.3%.

In all, 32 patients were diagnosed with viral infections by testing performed for the study, including 8 patients with chronic HBV, 22 with HCV, and 2 with HIV.

Additionally, the authors found that 4 patients with chronic HBV, 23 with HCV, and 7 with HIV had no identifiable risk factors.

The highest prevalence of infections occurred among patients with liver cancer, nonliver and noncolorectal cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, head and neck cancers, lung cancers, and prostate cancer. A finding of viral positivity changed the treatment plan in only 8% of all infected patients, however.

“Given that most HIV-infected patients in our study knew their viral status, the yield of universal HIV testing among patients with newly diagnosed cancer may likely be low. Although age-directed screening is recommended for HIV and HCV, uptake rates in primary care are variable and low overall,” Dr. Ramsey and his colleagues wrote.

The study was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Ramsey and several co-authors reported receiving NCI grants, and multiple co-authors reported grants and/or consulting fees from various companies.

SOURCE: Ramsey SD et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jan 17. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6437.

In a review of therapeutic issues for psoriasis patients who have such chronic infections as hepatitis, HIV, or latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) or those who fall into the category of special populations (pregnant women or children), significant concerns were directly tied to the mode of action of the drugs involved.

Courtesy NIH

In particular, “Most systemic agents for psoriasis are immunosuppressive, which poses a unique treatment challenge in patients with psoriasis with chronic infections because they are already immunosuppressed,” according to Shivani B. Kaushik, MD, a resident in the department of dermatology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and her colleague Mark G. Lebwohl, MD, professor and system chair of the department.

For example, the reviewers detailed a report of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) reactivation in patients with psoriasis who were taking biologics. Virus reactivation was noted in 2/175 patients who were positive for anti-HBc antibody, 3/97 patients with HCV infection, and 8/40 patients who were positive for HBsAg (the surface antigen of HBV). From this, they concluded that “biologics pose minimal risk for viral reactivation in patients with anti-HCV or anti-HBc antibodies, but they are of considerable risk in HBsAg-positive patients.” (J Amer Acad Derm. 2019 Jan;80:43-53).

Giving a specific example, Dr. Kaushik and her colleague pointed out that the safety of ustekinumab in patients with psoriasis with concurrent HCV and HBV infection was not clear. Viral reactivation and hepatocellular cancer were reported in one of four patients with HCV and in two of seven HBsAg-positive patients; and yet, another study showed that the successful use of ustekinumab for psoriasis had no impact on liver function or viral load in a patient with coexisting HCV.

Overall, “Patients should not be treated with immunosuppressive therapies during the acute stage. However, biologic treatment can be initiated in patients with chronic or resolved hepatitis under close monitoring and collaboration with a gastroenterologist,” the researchers stated.

In addition, they pointed out that methotrexate, another commonly prescribed drug for psoriasis, is absolutely contraindicated, although the use of cyclosporine remains controversial for those patients who are HCV-antibody positive.

“Most systemic agents used in psoriasis are immunosuppressive and require appropriate screening, monitoring, and prophylaxis when used in [psoriasis] patients with chronic infections, such as hepatitis, HIV, and LTBI,” the authors concluded.

The authors reported receiving funding from a number of pharmaceutical companies.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Kaushik BS et al. J Amer Acad Derm. 2019;80:43-53.
 

In a review of therapeutic issues for psoriasis patients who have such chronic infections as hepatitis, HIV, or latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) or those who fall into the category of special populations (pregnant women or children), significant concerns were directly tied to the mode of action of the drugs involved.

Courtesy NIH

In particular, “Most systemic agents for psoriasis are immunosuppressive, which poses a unique treatment challenge in patients with psoriasis with chronic infections because they are already immunosuppressed,” according to Shivani B. Kaushik, MD, a resident in the department of dermatology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and her colleague Mark G. Lebwohl, MD, professor and system chair of the department.

For example, the reviewers detailed a report of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) reactivation in patients with psoriasis who were taking biologics. Virus reactivation was noted in 2/175 patients who were positive for anti-HBc antibody, 3/97 patients with HCV infection, and 8/40 patients who were positive for HBsAg (the surface antigen of HBV). From this, they concluded that “biologics pose minimal risk for viral reactivation in patients with anti-HCV or anti-HBc antibodies, but they are of considerable risk in HBsAg-positive patients.” (J Amer Acad Derm. 2019 Jan;80:43-53).

Giving a specific example, Dr. Kaushik and her colleague pointed out that the safety of ustekinumab in patients with psoriasis with concurrent HCV and HBV infection was not clear. Viral reactivation and hepatocellular cancer were reported in one of four patients with HCV and in two of seven HBsAg-positive patients; and yet, another study showed that the successful use of ustekinumab for psoriasis had no impact on liver function or viral load in a patient with coexisting HCV.

Overall, “Patients should not be treated with immunosuppressive therapies during the acute stage. However, biologic treatment can be initiated in patients with chronic or resolved hepatitis under close monitoring and collaboration with a gastroenterologist,” the researchers stated.

In addition, they pointed out that methotrexate, another commonly prescribed drug for psoriasis, is absolutely contraindicated, although the use of cyclosporine remains controversial for those patients who are HCV-antibody positive.

“Most systemic agents used in psoriasis are immunosuppressive and require appropriate screening, monitoring, and prophylaxis when used in [psoriasis] patients with chronic infections, such as hepatitis, HIV, and LTBI,” the authors concluded.

The authors reported receiving funding from a number of pharmaceutical companies.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Kaushik BS et al. J Amer Acad Derm. 2019;80:43-53.
 

In a review of therapeutic issues for psoriasis patients who have such chronic infections as hepatitis, HIV, or latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) or those who fall into the category of special populations (pregnant women or children), significant concerns were directly tied to the mode of action of the drugs involved.

Courtesy NIH

In particular, “Most systemic agents for psoriasis are immunosuppressive, which poses a unique treatment challenge in patients with psoriasis with chronic infections because they are already immunosuppressed,” according to Shivani B. Kaushik, MD, a resident in the department of dermatology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and her colleague Mark G. Lebwohl, MD, professor and system chair of the department.

For example, the reviewers detailed a report of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) reactivation in patients with psoriasis who were taking biologics. Virus reactivation was noted in 2/175 patients who were positive for anti-HBc antibody, 3/97 patients with HCV infection, and 8/40 patients who were positive for HBsAg (the surface antigen of HBV). From this, they concluded that “biologics pose minimal risk for viral reactivation in patients with anti-HCV or anti-HBc antibodies, but they are of considerable risk in HBsAg-positive patients.” (J Amer Acad Derm. 2019 Jan;80:43-53).

Giving a specific example, Dr. Kaushik and her colleague pointed out that the safety of ustekinumab in patients with psoriasis with concurrent HCV and HBV infection was not clear. Viral reactivation and hepatocellular cancer were reported in one of four patients with HCV and in two of seven HBsAg-positive patients; and yet, another study showed that the successful use of ustekinumab for psoriasis had no impact on liver function or viral load in a patient with coexisting HCV.

Overall, “Patients should not be treated with immunosuppressive therapies during the acute stage. However, biologic treatment can be initiated in patients with chronic or resolved hepatitis under close monitoring and collaboration with a gastroenterologist,” the researchers stated.

In addition, they pointed out that methotrexate, another commonly prescribed drug for psoriasis, is absolutely contraindicated, although the use of cyclosporine remains controversial for those patients who are HCV-antibody positive.

“Most systemic agents used in psoriasis are immunosuppressive and require appropriate screening, monitoring, and prophylaxis when used in [psoriasis] patients with chronic infections, such as hepatitis, HIV, and LTBI,” the authors concluded.

The authors reported receiving funding from a number of pharmaceutical companies.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Kaushik BS et al. J Amer Acad Derm. 2019;80:43-53.
 

HIV-associated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a recently recognized entity and high index of suspicion is needed to diagnose these patients, according to Thomas Mathew, MD, and his colleagues at St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, India.

grandeduc/Thinkstock

“NMOSD can be associated with a wide range of autoimmune diseases but clinicians rarely diagnose NMOSD in cases of HIV infection and HIV-associated NMOSD is rarely mentioned in the conventional classification of NMOSD,” they stated.

Dr. Mathew and his colleagues reported the results of a case study they made of six cases of HIV-NMOSD identified from the literature and 1 HIV-infected patient from a registry for NMOSD that they had established, which had a total of 25 patients with the condition.

There were four men and three women in the study, ranging from 8 years to 49 years of age. The duration of HIV infection in these patients ranged from newly detected to 15 years, according to the report, published in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (2019 Jan;27:289-93).

Optic neuritis followed by myelitis was the commonest presentation, occurring in five of the seven patients. Of these, six patients were assayed for anti–aquaporin 4 antibodies, which are considered a serological marker of neuromyelitis optica; three patients were positive and three were negative.

All patients received immunomodulatory treatment. Five of the seven patients had a poor recovery from acute attacks, but no patient had further relapses while on immunomodulatory treatment and antiretroviral therapy.

Dr. Mathew and his colleagues suggested that all patients with HIV infection presenting with optic neuritis or/and myelitis, should have their anti–aquaporin 4 antibody status checked and in all patients of NMOSD, HIV infection should be ruled out.

“Prognosis of these patients is variable; residual neurological deficits were common but treatment prevented further attacks. Increased awareness of this association will lead to earlier diagnosis, early treatment and prevention of disability,” the researchers concluded.

The authors reported that they had no conflicts.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Mathew T et al. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:289-93.

HIV-associated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a recently recognized entity and high index of suspicion is needed to diagnose these patients, according to Thomas Mathew, MD, and his colleagues at St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, India.

grandeduc/Thinkstock

“NMOSD can be associated with a wide range of autoimmune diseases but clinicians rarely diagnose NMOSD in cases of HIV infection and HIV-associated NMOSD is rarely mentioned in the conventional classification of NMOSD,” they stated.

Dr. Mathew and his colleagues reported the results of a case study they made of six cases of HIV-NMOSD identified from the literature and 1 HIV-infected patient from a registry for NMOSD that they had established, which had a total of 25 patients with the condition.

There were four men and three women in the study, ranging from 8 years to 49 years of age. The duration of HIV infection in these patients ranged from newly detected to 15 years, according to the report, published in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (2019 Jan;27:289-93).

Optic neuritis followed by myelitis was the commonest presentation, occurring in five of the seven patients. Of these, six patients were assayed for anti–aquaporin 4 antibodies, which are considered a serological marker of neuromyelitis optica; three patients were positive and three were negative.

All patients received immunomodulatory treatment. Five of the seven patients had a poor recovery from acute attacks, but no patient had further relapses while on immunomodulatory treatment and antiretroviral therapy.

Dr. Mathew and his colleagues suggested that all patients with HIV infection presenting with optic neuritis or/and myelitis, should have their anti–aquaporin 4 antibody status checked and in all patients of NMOSD, HIV infection should be ruled out.

“Prognosis of these patients is variable; residual neurological deficits were common but treatment prevented further attacks. Increased awareness of this association will lead to earlier diagnosis, early treatment and prevention of disability,” the researchers concluded.

The authors reported that they had no conflicts.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Mathew T et al. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:289-93.

HIV-associated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a recently recognized entity and high index of suspicion is needed to diagnose these patients, according to Thomas Mathew, MD, and his colleagues at St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, India.

grandeduc/Thinkstock

“NMOSD can be associated with a wide range of autoimmune diseases but clinicians rarely diagnose NMOSD in cases of HIV infection and HIV-associated NMOSD is rarely mentioned in the conventional classification of NMOSD,” they stated.

Dr. Mathew and his colleagues reported the results of a case study they made of six cases of HIV-NMOSD identified from the literature and 1 HIV-infected patient from a registry for NMOSD that they had established, which had a total of 25 patients with the condition.

There were four men and three women in the study, ranging from 8 years to 49 years of age. The duration of HIV infection in these patients ranged from newly detected to 15 years, according to the report, published in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (2019 Jan;27:289-93).

Optic neuritis followed by myelitis was the commonest presentation, occurring in five of the seven patients. Of these, six patients were assayed for anti–aquaporin 4 antibodies, which are considered a serological marker of neuromyelitis optica; three patients were positive and three were negative.

All patients received immunomodulatory treatment. Five of the seven patients had a poor recovery from acute attacks, but no patient had further relapses while on immunomodulatory treatment and antiretroviral therapy.

Dr. Mathew and his colleagues suggested that all patients with HIV infection presenting with optic neuritis or/and myelitis, should have their anti–aquaporin 4 antibody status checked and in all patients of NMOSD, HIV infection should be ruled out.

“Prognosis of these patients is variable; residual neurological deficits were common but treatment prevented further attacks. Increased awareness of this association will lead to earlier diagnosis, early treatment and prevention of disability,” the researchers concluded.

The authors reported that they had no conflicts.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Mathew T et al. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:289-93.

Patients with HIV/AIDs are vulnerable to Talaromyces marneffei (T marneffei) infection, formerly penicilliosis. But in recent years more cases have been seen in patients not infected with HIV, too. Most cases originate in Southeast Asia: 10% of patients with AIDS in Hong Kong and 30% of patients in North Thailand, for example, have T marneffei infections. But patients with AIDS and penicilliosis travel, as do other immunocompromised patients. Thus, the first reported case of a patient with long-standing pulmonary sarcoidosis who developed T marneffei infection may have significance for clinicians caring for people with, or without, HIV.

Most patients with T marneffei infection have fever, weight loss, and malaise. Subcutaneous abscesses and papulelike ulcers are common (sometimes the lesions are very small). Anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, and diarrhea also are relatively common. However, while cough is a notable symptom, pneumonia is rare—even though the organism is inhaled.

The patient in this report, a native of Cangnan County (an endemic fungal area) in Southeast China, was admitted to the hospital with a 3-week history of daily hyperpyrexia and coughing sputum. When antibiotics did not help, a fungal culture revealed why: He had T marneffei infection. The clinicians say the preexisting pulmonary sarcoidosis covered the clinical features of T marneffei and initially misled them.

After 3 months of antifungal treatment, the patient’s physical condition improved. And the lung lesions were “markedly absorbed” after 3 months. The respiratory signs and skin lesions disappeared gradually after 8 days of treatment.

T marneffei infection is fatal if untreated. Early diagnosis and treatment with antifungals can be life saving.

Source:
Yu X, Miao K, Zhou C, et al. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):390.

Patients with HIV/AIDs are vulnerable to Talaromyces marneffei (T marneffei) infection, formerly penicilliosis. But in recent years more cases have been seen in patients not infected with HIV, too. Most cases originate in Southeast Asia: 10% of patients with AIDS in Hong Kong and 30% of patients in North Thailand, for example, have T marneffei infections. But patients with AIDS and penicilliosis travel, as do other immunocompromised patients. Thus, the first reported case of a patient with long-standing pulmonary sarcoidosis who developed T marneffei infection may have significance for clinicians caring for people with, or without, HIV.

Most patients with T marneffei infection have fever, weight loss, and malaise. Subcutaneous abscesses and papulelike ulcers are common (sometimes the lesions are very small). Anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, and diarrhea also are relatively common. However, while cough is a notable symptom, pneumonia is rare—even though the organism is inhaled.

The patient in this report, a native of Cangnan County (an endemic fungal area) in Southeast China, was admitted to the hospital with a 3-week history of daily hyperpyrexia and coughing sputum. When antibiotics did not help, a fungal culture revealed why: He had T marneffei infection. The clinicians say the preexisting pulmonary sarcoidosis covered the clinical features of T marneffei and initially misled them.

After 3 months of antifungal treatment, the patient’s physical condition improved. And the lung lesions were “markedly absorbed” after 3 months. The respiratory signs and skin lesions disappeared gradually after 8 days of treatment.

T marneffei infection is fatal if untreated. Early diagnosis and treatment with antifungals can be life saving.

Source:
Yu X, Miao K, Zhou C, et al. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):390.

Patients with HIV/AIDs are vulnerable to Talaromyces marneffei (T marneffei) infection, formerly penicilliosis. But in recent years more cases have been seen in patients not infected with HIV, too. Most cases originate in Southeast Asia: 10% of patients with AIDS in Hong Kong and 30% of patients in North Thailand, for example, have T marneffei infections. But patients with AIDS and penicilliosis travel, as do other immunocompromised patients. Thus, the first reported case of a patient with long-standing pulmonary sarcoidosis who developed T marneffei infection may have significance for clinicians caring for people with, or without, HIV.

Most patients with T marneffei infection have fever, weight loss, and malaise. Subcutaneous abscesses and papulelike ulcers are common (sometimes the lesions are very small). Anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, and diarrhea also are relatively common. However, while cough is a notable symptom, pneumonia is rare—even though the organism is inhaled.

The patient in this report, a native of Cangnan County (an endemic fungal area) in Southeast China, was admitted to the hospital with a 3-week history of daily hyperpyrexia and coughing sputum. When antibiotics did not help, a fungal culture revealed why: He had T marneffei infection. The clinicians say the preexisting pulmonary sarcoidosis covered the clinical features of T marneffei and initially misled them.

After 3 months of antifungal treatment, the patient’s physical condition improved. And the lung lesions were “markedly absorbed” after 3 months. The respiratory signs and skin lesions disappeared gradually after 8 days of treatment.

T marneffei infection is fatal if untreated. Early diagnosis and treatment with antifungals can be life saving.

Source:
Yu X, Miao K, Zhou C, et al. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):390.

CHICAGO – HIV infection remained linked with an increased risk for developing a cardiovascular disease event among U.S. patients, even in a recent era of antiretroviral therapy.

U.S. health insurance beneficiaries diagnosed with an HIV infection and likely put on antiretroviral therapy sometime during 2011-2015 had a statistically significant, 21% increased risk for the combination of MIs, coronary revascularizations, stroke, and lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) in a case-control, retrospective analysis, Robert S. Rosenson, MD, said in a poster he presented at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

“We looked at a contemporary population of people with HIV treated with antiretroviral therapy, and we looked at stroke and lower-extremity PAD [peripheral artery disease] as well as MI, while most prior studies only looked at MIs,” noted Dr. Rosenson, a professor of medicine and director of cardiometabolic disorders at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York.

The analysis found no significant differences in outcomes that linked with the specific type of antiretroviral therapy patients received. The most commonly used antiretroviral drug was a non–nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, taken by about 80% of the HIV-infected patients, Dr. Rosenson said. The 2011-2015 period examined in the study largely predated the more recent era, when integrase strand transfer inhibitor drugs have increasingly become the core agent for treating HIV infection.


Another key finding in the study was that a scant 19% of the people infected with HIV received statin treatment, and only 4% were on a high-intensity dosage. The 2018 guideline on cholesterol management identifies HIV infection as one of several “risk enhancers” that boost a person’s cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and intensify their need for statin treatment (Circulation. 2018 Nov 10. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625).

“Hopefully use of statins will increase in people with HIV, but of course we need evidence because so far the evidence does not show benefit,” he noted. In the data Dr. Rosenson reported, the HIV-infected patients who received a statin had roughly the same elevated risk for a CVD event as did HIV-infected patients who did not get a statin.

His study used data from a U.S. commercial database that combined Medicare patients with patients covered by commercial insurers. The analysis identified 82,426 people presumed recently infected by HIV based on either a hospitalization discharge with a diagnostic code for HIV or after filling at least two prescriptions for an antiretroviral drug during January 2011–June 2015. The researchers matched these cases on a 4:1 basis with 329,704 controls from the database matched by age, sex, and year for their index date. The total study cohort averaged about 45 years old, but the people infected by HIV averaged a couple of years older and also had at baseline an increased prevalence of several CVD risk factors and comorbidities. The people with HIV had a more than threefold higher rate of tobacco use, chronic kidney disease, and liver disease, and double the rate of diagnosed depression.

In a multivariate analysis that controlled for many demographic, social, and clinical variables, the results showed that the HIV-infected people had statistically significant higher rates of every individual element in the CVD composite. They had a 26% higher rate of MIs, a 17% higher rate of MIs plus coronary revascularization, a 30% higher rate of stroke, and a doubled rate of lower-extremity PAD.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Rosenson RS et al. Circulation. 2018 Nov 6;138[suppl 1]:A14410.

CHICAGO – HIV infection remained linked with an increased risk for developing a cardiovascular disease event among U.S. patients, even in a recent era of antiretroviral therapy.

U.S. health insurance beneficiaries diagnosed with an HIV infection and likely put on antiretroviral therapy sometime during 2011-2015 had a statistically significant, 21% increased risk for the combination of MIs, coronary revascularizations, stroke, and lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) in a case-control, retrospective analysis, Robert S. Rosenson, MD, said in a poster he presented at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

“We looked at a contemporary population of people with HIV treated with antiretroviral therapy, and we looked at stroke and lower-extremity PAD [peripheral artery disease] as well as MI, while most prior studies only looked at MIs,” noted Dr. Rosenson, a professor of medicine and director of cardiometabolic disorders at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York.

The analysis found no significant differences in outcomes that linked with the specific type of antiretroviral therapy patients received. The most commonly used antiretroviral drug was a non–nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, taken by about 80% of the HIV-infected patients, Dr. Rosenson said. The 2011-2015 period examined in the study largely predated the more recent era, when integrase strand transfer inhibitor drugs have increasingly become the core agent for treating HIV infection.


Another key finding in the study was that a scant 19% of the people infected with HIV received statin treatment, and only 4% were on a high-intensity dosage. The 2018 guideline on cholesterol management identifies HIV infection as one of several “risk enhancers” that boost a person’s cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and intensify their need for statin treatment (Circulation. 2018 Nov 10. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625).

“Hopefully use of statins will increase in people with HIV, but of course we need evidence because so far the evidence does not show benefit,” he noted. In the data Dr. Rosenson reported, the HIV-infected patients who received a statin had roughly the same elevated risk for a CVD event as did HIV-infected patients who did not get a statin.

His study used data from a U.S. commercial database that combined Medicare patients with patients covered by commercial insurers. The analysis identified 82,426 people presumed recently infected by HIV based on either a hospitalization discharge with a diagnostic code for HIV or after filling at least two prescriptions for an antiretroviral drug during January 2011–June 2015. The researchers matched these cases on a 4:1 basis with 329,704 controls from the database matched by age, sex, and year for their index date. The total study cohort averaged about 45 years old, but the people infected by HIV averaged a couple of years older and also had at baseline an increased prevalence of several CVD risk factors and comorbidities. The people with HIV had a more than threefold higher rate of tobacco use, chronic kidney disease, and liver disease, and double the rate of diagnosed depression.

In a multivariate analysis that controlled for many demographic, social, and clinical variables, the results showed that the HIV-infected people had statistically significant higher rates of every individual element in the CVD composite. They had a 26% higher rate of MIs, a 17% higher rate of MIs plus coronary revascularization, a 30% higher rate of stroke, and a doubled rate of lower-extremity PAD.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Rosenson RS et al. Circulation. 2018 Nov 6;138[suppl 1]:A14410.

CHICAGO – HIV infection remained linked with an increased risk for developing a cardiovascular disease event among U.S. patients, even in a recent era of antiretroviral therapy.

U.S. health insurance beneficiaries diagnosed with an HIV infection and likely put on antiretroviral therapy sometime during 2011-2015 had a statistically significant, 21% increased risk for the combination of MIs, coronary revascularizations, stroke, and lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) in a case-control, retrospective analysis, Robert S. Rosenson, MD, said in a poster he presented at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

“We looked at a contemporary population of people with HIV treated with antiretroviral therapy, and we looked at stroke and lower-extremity PAD [peripheral artery disease] as well as MI, while most prior studies only looked at MIs,” noted Dr. Rosenson, a professor of medicine and director of cardiometabolic disorders at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York.

The analysis found no significant differences in outcomes that linked with the specific type of antiretroviral therapy patients received. The most commonly used antiretroviral drug was a non–nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, taken by about 80% of the HIV-infected patients, Dr. Rosenson said. The 2011-2015 period examined in the study largely predated the more recent era, when integrase strand transfer inhibitor drugs have increasingly become the core agent for treating HIV infection.


Another key finding in the study was that a scant 19% of the people infected with HIV received statin treatment, and only 4% were on a high-intensity dosage. The 2018 guideline on cholesterol management identifies HIV infection as one of several “risk enhancers” that boost a person’s cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and intensify their need for statin treatment (Circulation. 2018 Nov 10. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625).

“Hopefully use of statins will increase in people with HIV, but of course we need evidence because so far the evidence does not show benefit,” he noted. In the data Dr. Rosenson reported, the HIV-infected patients who received a statin had roughly the same elevated risk for a CVD event as did HIV-infected patients who did not get a statin.

His study used data from a U.S. commercial database that combined Medicare patients with patients covered by commercial insurers. The analysis identified 82,426 people presumed recently infected by HIV based on either a hospitalization discharge with a diagnostic code for HIV or after filling at least two prescriptions for an antiretroviral drug during January 2011–June 2015. The researchers matched these cases on a 4:1 basis with 329,704 controls from the database matched by age, sex, and year for their index date. The total study cohort averaged about 45 years old, but the people infected by HIV averaged a couple of years older and also had at baseline an increased prevalence of several CVD risk factors and comorbidities. The people with HIV had a more than threefold higher rate of tobacco use, chronic kidney disease, and liver disease, and double the rate of diagnosed depression.

In a multivariate analysis that controlled for many demographic, social, and clinical variables, the results showed that the HIV-infected people had statistically significant higher rates of every individual element in the CVD composite. They had a 26% higher rate of MIs, a 17% higher rate of MIs plus coronary revascularization, a 30% higher rate of stroke, and a doubled rate of lower-extremity PAD.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Rosenson RS et al. Circulation. 2018 Nov 6;138[suppl 1]:A14410.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is valuable enough for the federal government to mandate insurance coverage, a group of experts told the personal finance website WalletHub, but individuals who are at risk for infection may be missing out for other reasons.

The effectiveness of PrEP is clear, those experts said, but 34% of primary care physicians and nurses in the United States are unaware of the preventive regimen, according to the WalletHub report, which also noted that the majority of Americans with AIDS (61%) are not seeing a specialist.

“Even among [men who have sex with men] in the U.S., coverage is only about 10%, which is abysmal. We can and need to do better. If we don’t pay now, we’ll pay later,” Steffanie Strathdee, PhD, associate dean of global health sciences and Harold Simon Professor at the University of California, San Diego, told WalletHub.

Those taking PrEP have a 90% chance of avoiding HIV infection, the report noted.

“Making PrEP available to all is a giant step forward in the fight against HIV. Mandating this critical prevention be covered by all insurance plans makes it part of mainstream medicine and will only increase its use and help prevent HIV acquisition in exposed populations. I can’t think of other low-risk, high-reward prophylaxis for a lifelong disease,” said Sharon Nachman, MD, professor of pediatrics and associate dean for research at the State University of New York at Stony Brook.

To get PrEP covered, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force needs to act, explained Gerald M. Oppenheimer, PhD, MPH, of the department of health policy and management at the City University of New York.

“Under the Affordable Care Act, if the [USPSTF] finds that PrEP serves as an effective prevention to disease and gives it a grade of A or B, all insurers must offer it free. That, of course, may lead to an increase in premiums. This is another example of pharmaceutical companies charging high prices in the U.S., compared to what other countries pay, and cries out for an amendment to Medicare Part D, allowing the federal government to negotiate lower drug prices,” he said.

[email protected]

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is valuable enough for the federal government to mandate insurance coverage, a group of experts told the personal finance website WalletHub, but individuals who are at risk for infection may be missing out for other reasons.

The effectiveness of PrEP is clear, those experts said, but 34% of primary care physicians and nurses in the United States are unaware of the preventive regimen, according to the WalletHub report, which also noted that the majority of Americans with AIDS (61%) are not seeing a specialist.

“Even among [men who have sex with men] in the U.S., coverage is only about 10%, which is abysmal. We can and need to do better. If we don’t pay now, we’ll pay later,” Steffanie Strathdee, PhD, associate dean of global health sciences and Harold Simon Professor at the University of California, San Diego, told WalletHub.

Those taking PrEP have a 90% chance of avoiding HIV infection, the report noted.

“Making PrEP available to all is a giant step forward in the fight against HIV. Mandating this critical prevention be covered by all insurance plans makes it part of mainstream medicine and will only increase its use and help prevent HIV acquisition in exposed populations. I can’t think of other low-risk, high-reward prophylaxis for a lifelong disease,” said Sharon Nachman, MD, professor of pediatrics and associate dean for research at the State University of New York at Stony Brook.

To get PrEP covered, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force needs to act, explained Gerald M. Oppenheimer, PhD, MPH, of the department of health policy and management at the City University of New York.

“Under the Affordable Care Act, if the [USPSTF] finds that PrEP serves as an effective prevention to disease and gives it a grade of A or B, all insurers must offer it free. That, of course, may lead to an increase in premiums. This is another example of pharmaceutical companies charging high prices in the U.S., compared to what other countries pay, and cries out for an amendment to Medicare Part D, allowing the federal government to negotiate lower drug prices,” he said.

[email protected]

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is valuable enough for the federal government to mandate insurance coverage, a group of experts told the personal finance website WalletHub, but individuals who are at risk for infection may be missing out for other reasons.

The effectiveness of PrEP is clear, those experts said, but 34% of primary care physicians and nurses in the United States are unaware of the preventive regimen, according to the WalletHub report, which also noted that the majority of Americans with AIDS (61%) are not seeing a specialist.

“Even among [men who have sex with men] in the U.S., coverage is only about 10%, which is abysmal. We can and need to do better. If we don’t pay now, we’ll pay later,” Steffanie Strathdee, PhD, associate dean of global health sciences and Harold Simon Professor at the University of California, San Diego, told WalletHub.

Those taking PrEP have a 90% chance of avoiding HIV infection, the report noted.

“Making PrEP available to all is a giant step forward in the fight against HIV. Mandating this critical prevention be covered by all insurance plans makes it part of mainstream medicine and will only increase its use and help prevent HIV acquisition in exposed populations. I can’t think of other low-risk, high-reward prophylaxis for a lifelong disease,” said Sharon Nachman, MD, professor of pediatrics and associate dean for research at the State University of New York at Stony Brook.

To get PrEP covered, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force needs to act, explained Gerald M. Oppenheimer, PhD, MPH, of the department of health policy and management at the City University of New York.

“Under the Affordable Care Act, if the [USPSTF] finds that PrEP serves as an effective prevention to disease and gives it a grade of A or B, all insurers must offer it free. That, of course, may lead to an increase in premiums. This is another example of pharmaceutical companies charging high prices in the U.S., compared to what other countries pay, and cries out for an amendment to Medicare Part D, allowing the federal government to negotiate lower drug prices,” he said.

[email protected]

In the year prior to HIV diagnosis, there were high rates of missed opportunities for HIV testing and sexual history documentation, according to a retrospective study of youth with HIV aged 14-26 years who were treated at an HIV clinic. These results demonstrate a failed need for routine HIV screening and counseling in adolescents, according to Nellie Riendeau Lazar, MPH, of Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and her colleagues.

alexskopje/ThinkStock

The researchers retrospectively identified 301 subjects between January 2009 and April 2015 who met their study criteria. A total of 58 of these (19%) had at least one visit in the care network in the year prior to diagnosis and their entry into the adolescent HIV clinic, and they were analyzed for missed diagnosis. The adolescent HIV clinic is part of a large care network in the Philadelphia area that includes a pediatric emergency department and a tertiary care hospital. At the time of the study, there were 31 primary care sites, according to the authors.

The mean age of the subjects in the study was 17. The majority (80%) were young men, African-American (93%), and men who have sex with men (81%). There were no significant differences seen in demographics between those with and without prior visits in the health system (J Adolesc Health. 2018;63:799-802).

The 58 subjects were seen in 179 health care visits in the year prior to their diagnosis: 56% outpatient, 40% emergency department, and 4% inpatient visits. Only 59% of these visits had any documentation of sexual history and “the overwhelming majority of those noting sexual activity included no other information,” such as number of partners, sex of partners, or condom use, according to the researchers.

Among the total cohort, 183 of 301 had never had an HIV test prior to their first positive test, even though 26% had been seen in the care network in the 3 years prior to their diagnosis. Among the 58 in the missed opportunity analysis, only 48% had HIV testing, even though 88% (51) had documented symptoms in their visits that could have been consistent with acute infection.

“Our findings support the most recent guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), recommending routine HIV screening for all adolescents, regardless of risk,” the researchers stated. “Adolescents may not always disclose sexual activity during routine assessment, and provider level barriers limit the reach of risk-based testing algorithms,” they added.

The authors reported that they had no conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Lazar NR et al. J Adolesc Health. 2018;63:799-802.

In the year prior to HIV diagnosis, there were high rates of missed opportunities for HIV testing and sexual history documentation, according to a retrospective study of youth with HIV aged 14-26 years who were treated at an HIV clinic. These results demonstrate a failed need for routine HIV screening and counseling in adolescents, according to Nellie Riendeau Lazar, MPH, of Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and her colleagues.

alexskopje/ThinkStock

The researchers retrospectively identified 301 subjects between January 2009 and April 2015 who met their study criteria. A total of 58 of these (19%) had at least one visit in the care network in the year prior to diagnosis and their entry into the adolescent HIV clinic, and they were analyzed for missed diagnosis. The adolescent HIV clinic is part of a large care network in the Philadelphia area that includes a pediatric emergency department and a tertiary care hospital. At the time of the study, there were 31 primary care sites, according to the authors.

The mean age of the subjects in the study was 17. The majority (80%) were young men, African-American (93%), and men who have sex with men (81%). There were no significant differences seen in demographics between those with and without prior visits in the health system (J Adolesc Health. 2018;63:799-802).

The 58 subjects were seen in 179 health care visits in the year prior to their diagnosis: 56% outpatient, 40% emergency department, and 4% inpatient visits. Only 59% of these visits had any documentation of sexual history and “the overwhelming majority of those noting sexual activity included no other information,” such as number of partners, sex of partners, or condom use, according to the researchers.

Among the total cohort, 183 of 301 had never had an HIV test prior to their first positive test, even though 26% had been seen in the care network in the 3 years prior to their diagnosis. Among the 58 in the missed opportunity analysis, only 48% had HIV testing, even though 88% (51) had documented symptoms in their visits that could have been consistent with acute infection.

“Our findings support the most recent guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), recommending routine HIV screening for all adolescents, regardless of risk,” the researchers stated. “Adolescents may not always disclose sexual activity during routine assessment, and provider level barriers limit the reach of risk-based testing algorithms,” they added.

The authors reported that they had no conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Lazar NR et al. J Adolesc Health. 2018;63:799-802.

In the year prior to HIV diagnosis, there were high rates of missed opportunities for HIV testing and sexual history documentation, according to a retrospective study of youth with HIV aged 14-26 years who were treated at an HIV clinic. These results demonstrate a failed need for routine HIV screening and counseling in adolescents, according to Nellie Riendeau Lazar, MPH, of Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and her colleagues.

alexskopje/ThinkStock

The researchers retrospectively identified 301 subjects between January 2009 and April 2015 who met their study criteria. A total of 58 of these (19%) had at least one visit in the care network in the year prior to diagnosis and their entry into the adolescent HIV clinic, and they were analyzed for missed diagnosis. The adolescent HIV clinic is part of a large care network in the Philadelphia area that includes a pediatric emergency department and a tertiary care hospital. At the time of the study, there were 31 primary care sites, according to the authors.

The mean age of the subjects in the study was 17. The majority (80%) were young men, African-American (93%), and men who have sex with men (81%). There were no significant differences seen in demographics between those with and without prior visits in the health system (J Adolesc Health. 2018;63:799-802).

The 58 subjects were seen in 179 health care visits in the year prior to their diagnosis: 56% outpatient, 40% emergency department, and 4% inpatient visits. Only 59% of these visits had any documentation of sexual history and “the overwhelming majority of those noting sexual activity included no other information,” such as number of partners, sex of partners, or condom use, according to the researchers.

Among the total cohort, 183 of 301 had never had an HIV test prior to their first positive test, even though 26% had been seen in the care network in the 3 years prior to their diagnosis. Among the 58 in the missed opportunity analysis, only 48% had HIV testing, even though 88% (51) had documented symptoms in their visits that could have been consistent with acute infection.

“Our findings support the most recent guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), recommending routine HIV screening for all adolescents, regardless of risk,” the researchers stated. “Adolescents may not always disclose sexual activity during routine assessment, and provider level barriers limit the reach of risk-based testing algorithms,” they added.

The authors reported that they had no conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Lazar NR et al. J Adolesc Health. 2018;63:799-802.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved the combination of lamivudine (3TC) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) known as Temixys for treatment of HIV-1 when used with other antiretrovirals. The approval is for adult and pediatric patients with HIV-1 who weigh at least 35 kg.

The approval is based on data through 144 weeks in a double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter trial in 600 antiretroviral-naive patients. The trial compared TDF/3TC plus efavirenz (EFV) with 3TC/EFV plus stavudine (d4T). The results showed similar responses at 144 weeks between both groups: 62% of patients taking TDF/3TC/EFV and 58% of patients taking d4T/3TC/EFV achieved and maintained fewer than 50 copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA.

The most common adverse events include headache, pain, depression, rash, and diarrhea. Prior to initiating treatment, patients should be tested for hepatitis B virus because there have been reports of 3TC-resistant strains of hepatitis B virus associated with treatment of HIV-1 with 3TC-containing regimens in coinfected patients. Patients should also be tested for estimated creatinine clearance, urine glucose, and urine protein because TDF/3TC is not recommended for patients with renal impairment.

The full prescribing information can be found on the FDA website.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved the combination of lamivudine (3TC) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) known as Temixys for treatment of HIV-1 when used with other antiretrovirals. The approval is for adult and pediatric patients with HIV-1 who weigh at least 35 kg.

The approval is based on data through 144 weeks in a double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter trial in 600 antiretroviral-naive patients. The trial compared TDF/3TC plus efavirenz (EFV) with 3TC/EFV plus stavudine (d4T). The results showed similar responses at 144 weeks between both groups: 62% of patients taking TDF/3TC/EFV and 58% of patients taking d4T/3TC/EFV achieved and maintained fewer than 50 copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA.

The most common adverse events include headache, pain, depression, rash, and diarrhea. Prior to initiating treatment, patients should be tested for hepatitis B virus because there have been reports of 3TC-resistant strains of hepatitis B virus associated with treatment of HIV-1 with 3TC-containing regimens in coinfected patients. Patients should also be tested for estimated creatinine clearance, urine glucose, and urine protein because TDF/3TC is not recommended for patients with renal impairment.

The full prescribing information can be found on the FDA website.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved the combination of lamivudine (3TC) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) known as Temixys for treatment of HIV-1 when used with other antiretrovirals. The approval is for adult and pediatric patients with HIV-1 who weigh at least 35 kg.

The approval is based on data through 144 weeks in a double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter trial in 600 antiretroviral-naive patients. The trial compared TDF/3TC plus efavirenz (EFV) with 3TC/EFV plus stavudine (d4T). The results showed similar responses at 144 weeks between both groups: 62% of patients taking TDF/3TC/EFV and 58% of patients taking d4T/3TC/EFV achieved and maintained fewer than 50 copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA.

The most common adverse events include headache, pain, depression, rash, and diarrhea. Prior to initiating treatment, patients should be tested for hepatitis B virus because there have been reports of 3TC-resistant strains of hepatitis B virus associated with treatment of HIV-1 with 3TC-containing regimens in coinfected patients. Patients should also be tested for estimated creatinine clearance, urine glucose, and urine protein because TDF/3TC is not recommended for patients with renal impairment.

The full prescribing information can be found on the FDA website.

[email protected]

Reliable treatment with broadly neutralizing antibodies—bNAbs—could change the future for people living with HIV. But studies have found that infusions of a single bNAb did not suppress HIV because some patients developed resistance.

Rockefeller University researchers, however, theorized that combining multiple antibodies that target distinct regions of HIV would both suppress the virus and prevent resistance. So in an NIH-supported pilot study, researhcers recruited 15 volunteers whose HIV was suppressed with antiretroviral treatment (ART) and who were sensitive to 3BNC117 and 10-1074, both potent bNAbs.

Participants received infusions of both bNAbs, stopped taking ART 2 days later, and received additional infusions 3 and 6 weeks later.

Of the 11 people who completed the study, 9 maintained viral suppression without ART for an average of 15 weeks, until the amount of bNAbs in their bodies fell below protective levels. In 2 of the 9, virus was controlled through the end of the 30-week follow-up period. The remaining 2 participants were found to harbor HIV resistant to at least 1 bNAb and experienced viral rebound before 12 weeks after stopping ART.

The researchers are enrolling people with HIV in a larger study to determine an optimal regimen of bNAbs.

Reliable treatment with broadly neutralizing antibodies—bNAbs—could change the future for people living with HIV. But studies have found that infusions of a single bNAb did not suppress HIV because some patients developed resistance.

Rockefeller University researchers, however, theorized that combining multiple antibodies that target distinct regions of HIV would both suppress the virus and prevent resistance. So in an NIH-supported pilot study, researhcers recruited 15 volunteers whose HIV was suppressed with antiretroviral treatment (ART) and who were sensitive to 3BNC117 and 10-1074, both potent bNAbs.

Participants received infusions of both bNAbs, stopped taking ART 2 days later, and received additional infusions 3 and 6 weeks later.

Of the 11 people who completed the study, 9 maintained viral suppression without ART for an average of 15 weeks, until the amount of bNAbs in their bodies fell below protective levels. In 2 of the 9, virus was controlled through the end of the 30-week follow-up period. The remaining 2 participants were found to harbor HIV resistant to at least 1 bNAb and experienced viral rebound before 12 weeks after stopping ART.

The researchers are enrolling people with HIV in a larger study to determine an optimal regimen of bNAbs.

Reliable treatment with broadly neutralizing antibodies—bNAbs—could change the future for people living with HIV. But studies have found that infusions of a single bNAb did not suppress HIV because some patients developed resistance.

Rockefeller University researchers, however, theorized that combining multiple antibodies that target distinct regions of HIV would both suppress the virus and prevent resistance. So in an NIH-supported pilot study, researhcers recruited 15 volunteers whose HIV was suppressed with antiretroviral treatment (ART) and who were sensitive to 3BNC117 and 10-1074, both potent bNAbs.

Participants received infusions of both bNAbs, stopped taking ART 2 days later, and received additional infusions 3 and 6 weeks later.

Of the 11 people who completed the study, 9 maintained viral suppression without ART for an average of 15 weeks, until the amount of bNAbs in their bodies fell below protective levels. In 2 of the 9, virus was controlled through the end of the 30-week follow-up period. The remaining 2 participants were found to harbor HIV resistant to at least 1 bNAb and experienced viral rebound before 12 weeks after stopping ART.

The researchers are enrolling people with HIV in a larger study to determine an optimal regimen of bNAbs.

Individuals aged 15-65 years, including pregnant women, should be screened for HIV infection, and those at risk should be given prophylaxis, according to draft recommendations issued by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The screening recommendation extends to younger adolescents and older adults at increased risk for HIV infection. The recommendations are level A.

varnent/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 3.0

HIV remains a significant public health issue in the United States, with rates rising among individuals aged 25-29 years, although the overall number of cases has dropped slightly, according to the USPSTF report.

HIV prevention is a multistep process that includes not only screening but also wearing condoms during sex and using clean needles and syringes if injecting drugs, the researchers noted.

However, those at high risk for HIV, such as intravenous drug users, can help reduce their risk by taking a daily pill, the researchers wrote.

In an evidence report submitted to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, researchers reviewed the Cochrane databases, MEDLINE, and Embase for studies up to June 2018. Based on data from 11 trials, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) consisting of antiretroviral therapy was associated with decreased risk of HIV infection, compared with placebo or no PrEP, with consistent effects across risk categories, the investigators noted.

The most common HIV risk factors include man-to-man sexual contact, injection drug use, having sex without a condom, exchanging sex for drugs or money, and having sex with an HIV-infected partner, according to the USPSTF report.

Although PrEP was associated with renal and gastrointestinal adverse effects, most were mild and resolved when the therapy either ended or continued long term. The use of PrEP does not absolve high-risk individuals from observing safety in sex activity and intravenous drug use, the researchers noted.

The Task Force’s draft recommendation statements and draft evidence reviews are available for public comment and are posted on the Task Force website at www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org. Comments can be submitted from Nov. 20, 2018, to Dec. 26, 2018, at www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/tfcomment.htm.

Individuals aged 15-65 years, including pregnant women, should be screened for HIV infection, and those at risk should be given prophylaxis, according to draft recommendations issued by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The screening recommendation extends to younger adolescents and older adults at increased risk for HIV infection. The recommendations are level A.

varnent/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 3.0

HIV remains a significant public health issue in the United States, with rates rising among individuals aged 25-29 years, although the overall number of cases has dropped slightly, according to the USPSTF report.

HIV prevention is a multistep process that includes not only screening but also wearing condoms during sex and using clean needles and syringes if injecting drugs, the researchers noted.

However, those at high risk for HIV, such as intravenous drug users, can help reduce their risk by taking a daily pill, the researchers wrote.

In an evidence report submitted to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, researchers reviewed the Cochrane databases, MEDLINE, and Embase for studies up to June 2018. Based on data from 11 trials, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) consisting of antiretroviral therapy was associated with decreased risk of HIV infection, compared with placebo or no PrEP, with consistent effects across risk categories, the investigators noted.

The most common HIV risk factors include man-to-man sexual contact, injection drug use, having sex without a condom, exchanging sex for drugs or money, and having sex with an HIV-infected partner, according to the USPSTF report.

Although PrEP was associated with renal and gastrointestinal adverse effects, most were mild and resolved when the therapy either ended or continued long term. The use of PrEP does not absolve high-risk individuals from observing safety in sex activity and intravenous drug use, the researchers noted.

The Task Force’s draft recommendation statements and draft evidence reviews are available for public comment and are posted on the Task Force website at www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org. Comments can be submitted from Nov. 20, 2018, to Dec. 26, 2018, at www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/tfcomment.htm.

Individuals aged 15-65 years, including pregnant women, should be screened for HIV infection, and those at risk should be given prophylaxis, according to draft recommendations issued by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The screening recommendation extends to younger adolescents and older adults at increased risk for HIV infection. The recommendations are level A.

varnent/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 3.0

HIV remains a significant public health issue in the United States, with rates rising among individuals aged 25-29 years, although the overall number of cases has dropped slightly, according to the USPSTF report.

HIV prevention is a multistep process that includes not only screening but also wearing condoms during sex and using clean needles and syringes if injecting drugs, the researchers noted.

However, those at high risk for HIV, such as intravenous drug users, can help reduce their risk by taking a daily pill, the researchers wrote.

In an evidence report submitted to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, researchers reviewed the Cochrane databases, MEDLINE, and Embase for studies up to June 2018. Based on data from 11 trials, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) consisting of antiretroviral therapy was associated with decreased risk of HIV infection, compared with placebo or no PrEP, with consistent effects across risk categories, the investigators noted.

The most common HIV risk factors include man-to-man sexual contact, injection drug use, having sex without a condom, exchanging sex for drugs or money, and having sex with an HIV-infected partner, according to the USPSTF report.

Although PrEP was associated with renal and gastrointestinal adverse effects, most were mild and resolved when the therapy either ended or continued long term. The use of PrEP does not absolve high-risk individuals from observing safety in sex activity and intravenous drug use, the researchers noted.

The Task Force’s draft recommendation statements and draft evidence reviews are available for public comment and are posted on the Task Force website at www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org. Comments can be submitted from Nov. 20, 2018, to Dec. 26, 2018, at www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/tfcomment.htm.