Performing dermatologic procedures in infants, children, and teenagers presents many unique challenges. There may be unique diagnoses, different instruments, differences in skin biology, or different approaches to pain management and anesthesia; the inclusion of a third party (caregivers) in decision processes; or a need to assess maturity level or to optimize outcomes over the patient’s lifetime. The field of pediatric procedural dermatology is broad. This article reviews some of the more common procedures performed by pediatric dermatologists and some of the more common ethical and quality-of-life (QOL) considerations one might face in procedural pediatric dermatology. (The textbook Procedural Pediatric Dermatology¹ offers a thorough discussion of this topic.)

Quality of Life

More often than not, procedures are performed in pediatric dermatology to improve QOL rather than to prevent morbidity or mortality. In the case of many self-limited conditions, such as ingrown nails or pyogenic granulomas, it is clear that intervention will improve the patient’s QOL. In the case of warts and molluscum contagiosum, emotional, social, and cultural considerations play a large role in determining whether an intervention will improve QOL. Finally, some conditions, such as genodermatoses, giant congenital melanocytic nevi, and large vascular malformations, may be associated with additional systemic symptoms and may not have good treatment options for cure. In these cases, procedural interventions will result in a mixture of positive and negative QOL outcomes that can occur at the same time.

Bemmels et al² published a qualitative study that provides a good foundation for understanding the positive and negative effects of procedural interventions on children and teenagers. In their study, children and teenagers who underwent reconstructive surgery for craniofacial differences noted improved self-esteem and reduced stigmatization. However, they also experienced negative outcomes, including an addiction to attaining a perfect surgical face, missing school for treatments, difficulty adjusting to an evolving appearance, anxiety related to not knowing when treatments will end, and experiencing stigma related to undergoing surgery.² Thus, a comprehensive plan for the management of children who need ongoing procedures should include some level of psychosocial support. Two good references on supporting young patients with visible differences include CBT for Appearance Anxiety: Psychosocial Interventions for Anxiety Due to Visible Difference³ and Reaching Teens: Strength-Based, Trauma-Sensitive, Resilience-Building Communication Strategies Rooted in Positive Youth Development.⁴

Ethics

Ethical decisions in pediatric procedural dermatology differ from adult dermatology in 3 major ways: (1) the involvement of a third party (ie, parents or legal guardians), (2) the need to assess the maturity of the patient, and (3) the need to know local laws in the jurisdiction in which care is being provided. Ethical dilemmas occur when the desires of the child, parents/guardians, and dermatologist are not in alignment. In these cases, it is important to be prepared with a moral or ethical framework to guide decision-making when conflicts occur. Two great resources are the best interest standard⁵ and the publication entitled, “Informed Consent in Decision-making in Pediatric Practice,” from the American Academy of Pediatrics.⁶

In pediatrics, it often is better to conceptualize medical decision-making as a combination of informed permission and assent of the patient rather than informed consent. Informed permission describes how a parent or surrogate makes decisions for the child or adolescent and is similar to informed consent. A parent’s informed permission may be in conflict with a child’s wishes, but it is assumed that the parent is acting in the best interest of the child. Assent of the patient is the process of obtaining a minor’s agreement to undergo an intervention even though he/she may lack legal authority or decision-making capacity to provide standard informed consent. It is important to respect the child’s right to assent to interventions to the extent that their maturity level permits to develop trust with the dermatologist and medical encounters in general.

These differences emphasize an active process in which the patient, caregiver, and physician are all involved in the health care process and allow for increasing inclusion of the child as is developmentally appropriate. In the end, however, parents have the legal authority to give or withhold permission for a procedure.⁷ When this conflicts with a child’s dissent, the dermatologist will need to objectively explore the reasons for the conflict and decide if a procedure is not in the child’s best interests. If a mutual understanding cannot be reached between the dermatologist and parents, obtaining a second opinion is a good option.⁸

Common Diagnoses

The most common diagnoses unique to procedural pediatric dermatology include congenital melanocytic nevi, vascular anomalies, midline lesions, epidermal nevi, and pilomatricomas. Prior to intervening on these lesions, it is important to consider evaluating for associated diseases.

Congenital Melanocytic Nevi
Nevus Outreach has published best practices for the management of congenital melanocytic nevi.⁹ In newborns with a congenital melanocytic nevus greater than 3 cm in diameter or more than 20 satellite lesions, it is recommended that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and spine with and without gadolinium contrast be obtained before 6 months of age. Within the first 6 months of life, these children also should see ophthalmologists, neurologists, pediatric dermatologists, and plastic surgeons. These early referrals will help to establish a baseline for the patient and plan for possible interventions, if needed. Additionally, before 3 years of age, every child should be referred to psychology, even if he/she is asymptomatic.¹⁰

Vascular Anomalies
Prior to intervening on a vascular anomaly, it is important to accurately classify the lesion. Once the lesion is classified, an evaluation and treatment plan can be developed. The International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies has published a detailed classification guide that is a useful starting point in the management of vascular anomalies.¹¹ Once a diagnosis is confirmed, further evaluation may include imaging, specialty referrals, genetic testing, biopsy, or blood tests, and a pediatric dermatologist usually helps to coordinate the care of patients with complex vascular anomalies.

Midline Lesions
Certain lesions in the midline may have a higher risk for neural tube dysraphism, and imaging should be performed prior to any procedural intervention.¹² Midline cutaneous findings that are highly likely to be associated with dysraphism are lipomas, acrochordons, pseudotails, true tails, aplasia cutis congenita, congenital scars, dermoid cysts, dermoid sinuses, and infantile hemangiomas that are greater than 2.5 cm in diameter. An MRI should be performed for all high-risk lesions. Intermediate-risk lesions are atypical dimples (>5 mm in diameter or >2.5 cm from the anal verge), hemangiomas less than 2.5 cm in diameter, and hypertrichosis. An ultrasound can screen for spinal dysraphism in these cases as long as imaging is performed prior to 6 months of age. If the child is older than 6 months, an MRI should be performed. Low-risk lesions that do not require imaging are simple dimples, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, melanocytic nevi, port-wine stains, and telangiectases.

Epidermal Nevi
Children with epidermal nevi should have a complete physical examination, focusing on the skeletal system, central nervous system, and eyes. There are no specifically recommended imaging studies or referrals; however, several diagnostic clues can aid in the diagnosis of an epidermal nevus syndrome¹³:

• Schimmelpenning syndrome: extensive nevus sebaceous and bowing or pain in the legs after 2 years of age

• Phacomatosis pigmentokeratotica: nevus sebaceous and nevus spilus

• Nevus comedonicus syndrome: ipsilateral cataract

• Angora hair nevus syndrome: soft white hair within the nevus

• Becker nevus syndrome: breast hypoplasia

• Proteus syndrome: cerebriform plantar changes

• PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum: lipomas, macrodactyly, and/or vascular malformations

• Congenital hemidysplasia with ichthyosiform erythroderma and limb defects: inflammatory epidermal nevi, lateralization, ptychotropism, and ipsilateral limb defects

• Conradi-Hünermann-Happle syndrome: scaly red epidermal nevi without hair follicles and asymmetric limb shortening

Pilomatricomas
In addition to the tent sign—an angulated shape can be appreciated by stretching the skin overlying pilomatricomas—diagnosis of pilomatricoma can be confirmed by transillumination with an otoscope. In this case, a dark shadow typically is cast distal to where the otoscope touches the skin.¹⁴ In the case of multiple lesions, the patient should be evaluated for signs of myotonic dystrophy, Turner syndrome, and Gardner syndrome.¹⁵

Common Procedures

Pulsed Dye Laser
The pulsed dye laser is the most common laser used for red-colored lesions such as port-wine stains, facial telangiectases, and superficial hemangiomas. It also can be used to treat erythematous scars, verrucae, and psoriasis. In large vascular lesions, it typically is employed at 0.45 to 10 milliseconds every 4 to 6 weeks for 10 or more treatments. Port-wine stains preferably are treated within the first few months of life to provide the most fading without the need for general anesthesia.¹⁶ On the other hand, systemic therapy with propranolol is preferred over lasers for infantile hemangiomas.¹⁷

Long-Pulsed Alexandrite Laser (755 nm)
The alexandrite laser often is used to treat deeper vascular lesions such as venous lakes and hypertrophic port-wine stains. The operator needs to be cautious, as this laser has a higher incidence of scarring at the settings used to treat vascular lesions (typically fluences around 60–85 J/cm²).¹⁸ It also may be used for hair reduction in disorders with hypertrichosis or hidradenitis suppurativa.¹⁹

Long-Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser
The long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser also can be used to treat deep vascular lesions and remove unwanted hair. Because of its low window of safety in the treatment of vascular lesions, the alexandrite laser usually is preferred. However, it is the preferred laser for treatment of unwanted hair and hidradenitis suppurativa in darker skin types. It often provides a 50% reduction in hair density after 9 treatments.²⁰

Quality-Switched Lasers
Pigment granules in melanosomes and tattoo particles are targeted with quality-switched (QS) lasers. Typically, a device will contain a combination of QS 532-nm potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) lasers, QS 1064-nm Nd:YAG lasers, and QS 755-nm alexandrite lasers in 1 machine. In general, shorter wavelengths are used to treat epidermal lesions such as ephelides, lentigines, and café-au-lait macules. Longer wavelengths are used to treat deeper lesions such as nevus of Ota. A 2017 review suggested that café-au-lait macules with ragged borders (so-called coast of Maine borders) may respond well to QS lasers.²¹

Ablative Lasers
The 10,600-nm CO₂ laser and 2940-nm erbium:YAG laser can be used to debulk superficial tumors such as lymphangiomas, syringomas, angiofibromas, and xanthomas.²² These treatments have a higher risk for scarring than other lasers, so it is important to have a good understanding of desired clinical end points before using these devices.

Fractionated Lasers
Fractionated lasers can be nonablative (several devices are available in the 1410- to 1927-nm range) or ablative (CO₂ or erbium:YAG). In pediatrics, they are usually used to treat burn scars, traumatic scars, and mild to moderate acne scarring.²² The most common side effects from fractionated lasers are prolonged erythema or hyperpigmentation. In addition, it typically takes at least 3 treatments to notice improvements.

Excisions

Pediatric procedural dermatologists remove a variety of unique lesions through excision. A few tips are provided for some of the more common lesions that may be excised in children.

Accessory Tragi
Prior to excising an accessory tragus, the surgeon should consider documenting a facial nerve examination, as accessory tragi can be associated with complete or partial facial nerve dysfunction. Additionally, there usually is an underlying cartilage structure present within the tragus. The cartilage stalk also should be addressed during the excision to avoid a continued palpable deformity after excision.

Dermoid Cysts
Dermoid cysts are the most commonly diagnosed benign orbital lesion in children.²³ Exophytic periorbital lesions, which extend outside the orbital rim, can be removed through an infrabrow incision. Endophytic periorbital lesions, which are inside the orbital rim, should be removed through a crease incision. Midline lesions may have an intracranial extension and should be imaged through MRI and/or a computed tomography.²⁴ Because dermoid cysts usually are located below the orbicularis oculi muscle, the muscle should be fixed with a suture prior to closing with skin sutures.

Pilomatricomas
Typically, a linear incision is made overlying the lesion, and then the underlying tumor is removed with sharp or blunt dissection. However, if the overlying skin has been stretched thin, a lenticular excision that includes the thinned skin may improve cosmesis.

Congenital Nevi
Large congenital nevi typically are removed through staged excisions. Lower extremity lesions are best removed before 10 months of age or before walking begins to minimize wound tension. However, if the procedure is not performed in infancy, it is best to wait until walking becomes stable.²⁵ In older children, it is advisable to splint the affected lower extremity for 2 weeks to prevent dehiscence. The interval between excisions typically is 4 to 6 weeks for small lesions and 3 months for larger nevi.

Conclusion

Procedural pediatric dermatology is a broad and emerging field. As this article highlights, children are not small versions of adults and have unique biology, diseases, therapies, social situations, and ethical challenges from adults. This article provides a superficial overview of some of the more common issues faced by pediatric dermatologists and providers who perform procedures on infants, children, and teenagers. Readers who are interested in obtaining a more in-depth understanding of procedural pediatric dermatology should look at Procedural Pediatric Dermatology,¹ the first textbook to provide expert opinion and evidence-based information on procedural management of pediatric skin conditions.

Performing dermatologic procedures in infants, children, and teenagers presents many unique challenges. There may be unique diagnoses, different instruments, differences in skin biology, or different approaches to pain management and anesthesia; the inclusion of a third party (caregivers) in decision processes; or a need to assess maturity level or to optimize outcomes over the patient’s lifetime. The field of pediatric procedural dermatology is broad. This article reviews some of the more common procedures performed by pediatric dermatologists and some of the more common ethical and quality-of-life (QOL) considerations one might face in procedural pediatric dermatology. (The textbook Procedural Pediatric Dermatology¹ offers a thorough discussion of this topic.)

Quality of Life

More often than not, procedures are performed in pediatric dermatology to improve QOL rather than to prevent morbidity or mortality. In the case of many self-limited conditions, such as ingrown nails or pyogenic granulomas, it is clear that intervention will improve the patient’s QOL. In the case of warts and molluscum contagiosum, emotional, social, and cultural considerations play a large role in determining whether an intervention will improve QOL. Finally, some conditions, such as genodermatoses, giant congenital melanocytic nevi, and large vascular malformations, may be associated with additional systemic symptoms and may not have good treatment options for cure. In these cases, procedural interventions will result in a mixture of positive and negative QOL outcomes that can occur at the same time.

Bemmels et al² published a qualitative study that provides a good foundation for understanding the positive and negative effects of procedural interventions on children and teenagers. In their study, children and teenagers who underwent reconstructive surgery for craniofacial differences noted improved self-esteem and reduced stigmatization. However, they also experienced negative outcomes, including an addiction to attaining a perfect surgical face, missing school for treatments, difficulty adjusting to an evolving appearance, anxiety related to not knowing when treatments will end, and experiencing stigma related to undergoing surgery.² Thus, a comprehensive plan for the management of children who need ongoing procedures should include some level of psychosocial support. Two good references on supporting young patients with visible differences include CBT for Appearance Anxiety: Psychosocial Interventions for Anxiety Due to Visible Difference³ and Reaching Teens: Strength-Based, Trauma-Sensitive, Resilience-Building Communication Strategies Rooted in Positive Youth Development.⁴

Ethics

Ethical decisions in pediatric procedural dermatology differ from adult dermatology in 3 major ways: (1) the involvement of a third party (ie, parents or legal guardians), (2) the need to assess the maturity of the patient, and (3) the need to know local laws in the jurisdiction in which care is being provided. Ethical dilemmas occur when the desires of the child, parents/guardians, and dermatologist are not in alignment. In these cases, it is important to be prepared with a moral or ethical framework to guide decision-making when conflicts occur. Two great resources are the best interest standard⁵ and the publication entitled, “Informed Consent in Decision-making in Pediatric Practice,” from the American Academy of Pediatrics.⁶

In pediatrics, it often is better to conceptualize medical decision-making as a combination of informed permission and assent of the patient rather than informed consent. Informed permission describes how a parent or surrogate makes decisions for the child or adolescent and is similar to informed consent. A parent’s informed permission may be in conflict with a child’s wishes, but it is assumed that the parent is acting in the best interest of the child. Assent of the patient is the process of obtaining a minor’s agreement to undergo an intervention even though he/she may lack legal authority or decision-making capacity to provide standard informed consent. It is important to respect the child’s right to assent to interventions to the extent that their maturity level permits to develop trust with the dermatologist and medical encounters in general.

These differences emphasize an active process in which the patient, caregiver, and physician are all involved in the health care process and allow for increasing inclusion of the child as is developmentally appropriate. In the end, however, parents have the legal authority to give or withhold permission for a procedure.⁷ When this conflicts with a child’s dissent, the dermatologist will need to objectively explore the reasons for the conflict and decide if a procedure is not in the child’s best interests. If a mutual understanding cannot be reached between the dermatologist and parents, obtaining a second opinion is a good option.⁸

Common Diagnoses

The most common diagnoses unique to procedural pediatric dermatology include congenital melanocytic nevi, vascular anomalies, midline lesions, epidermal nevi, and pilomatricomas. Prior to intervening on these lesions, it is important to consider evaluating for associated diseases.

Congenital Melanocytic Nevi
Nevus Outreach has published best practices for the management of congenital melanocytic nevi.⁹ In newborns with a congenital melanocytic nevus greater than 3 cm in diameter or more than 20 satellite lesions, it is recommended that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and spine with and without gadolinium contrast be obtained before 6 months of age. Within the first 6 months of life, these children also should see ophthalmologists, neurologists, pediatric dermatologists, and plastic surgeons. These early referrals will help to establish a baseline for the patient and plan for possible interventions, if needed. Additionally, before 3 years of age, every child should be referred to psychology, even if he/she is asymptomatic.¹⁰

Vascular Anomalies
Prior to intervening on a vascular anomaly, it is important to accurately classify the lesion. Once the lesion is classified, an evaluation and treatment plan can be developed. The International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies has published a detailed classification guide that is a useful starting point in the management of vascular anomalies.¹¹ Once a diagnosis is confirmed, further evaluation may include imaging, specialty referrals, genetic testing, biopsy, or blood tests, and a pediatric dermatologist usually helps to coordinate the care of patients with complex vascular anomalies.

Midline Lesions
Certain lesions in the midline may have a higher risk for neural tube dysraphism, and imaging should be performed prior to any procedural intervention.¹² Midline cutaneous findings that are highly likely to be associated with dysraphism are lipomas, acrochordons, pseudotails, true tails, aplasia cutis congenita, congenital scars, dermoid cysts, dermoid sinuses, and infantile hemangiomas that are greater than 2.5 cm in diameter. An MRI should be performed for all high-risk lesions. Intermediate-risk lesions are atypical dimples (>5 mm in diameter or >2.5 cm from the anal verge), hemangiomas less than 2.5 cm in diameter, and hypertrichosis. An ultrasound can screen for spinal dysraphism in these cases as long as imaging is performed prior to 6 months of age. If the child is older than 6 months, an MRI should be performed. Low-risk lesions that do not require imaging are simple dimples, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, melanocytic nevi, port-wine stains, and telangiectases.

Epidermal Nevi
Children with epidermal nevi should have a complete physical examination, focusing on the skeletal system, central nervous system, and eyes. There are no specifically recommended imaging studies or referrals; however, several diagnostic clues can aid in the diagnosis of an epidermal nevus syndrome¹³:

• Schimmelpenning syndrome: extensive nevus sebaceous and bowing or pain in the legs after 2 years of age

• Phacomatosis pigmentokeratotica: nevus sebaceous and nevus spilus

• Nevus comedonicus syndrome: ipsilateral cataract

• Angora hair nevus syndrome: soft white hair within the nevus

• Becker nevus syndrome: breast hypoplasia

• Proteus syndrome: cerebriform plantar changes

• PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum: lipomas, macrodactyly, and/or vascular malformations

• Congenital hemidysplasia with ichthyosiform erythroderma and limb defects: inflammatory epidermal nevi, lateralization, ptychotropism, and ipsilateral limb defects

• Conradi-Hünermann-Happle syndrome: scaly red epidermal nevi without hair follicles and asymmetric limb shortening

Pilomatricomas
In addition to the tent sign—an angulated shape can be appreciated by stretching the skin overlying pilomatricomas—diagnosis of pilomatricoma can be confirmed by transillumination with an otoscope. In this case, a dark shadow typically is cast distal to where the otoscope touches the skin.¹⁴ In the case of multiple lesions, the patient should be evaluated for signs of myotonic dystrophy, Turner syndrome, and Gardner syndrome.¹⁵

Common Procedures

Pulsed Dye Laser
The pulsed dye laser is the most common laser used for red-colored lesions such as port-wine stains, facial telangiectases, and superficial hemangiomas. It also can be used to treat erythematous scars, verrucae, and psoriasis. In large vascular lesions, it typically is employed at 0.45 to 10 milliseconds every 4 to 6 weeks for 10 or more treatments. Port-wine stains preferably are treated within the first few months of life to provide the most fading without the need for general anesthesia.¹⁶ On the other hand, systemic therapy with propranolol is preferred over lasers for infantile hemangiomas.¹⁷

Long-Pulsed Alexandrite Laser (755 nm)
The alexandrite laser often is used to treat deeper vascular lesions such as venous lakes and hypertrophic port-wine stains. The operator needs to be cautious, as this laser has a higher incidence of scarring at the settings used to treat vascular lesions (typically fluences around 60–85 J/cm²).¹⁸ It also may be used for hair reduction in disorders with hypertrichosis or hidradenitis suppurativa.¹⁹

Long-Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser
The long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser also can be used to treat deep vascular lesions and remove unwanted hair. Because of its low window of safety in the treatment of vascular lesions, the alexandrite laser usually is preferred. However, it is the preferred laser for treatment of unwanted hair and hidradenitis suppurativa in darker skin types. It often provides a 50% reduction in hair density after 9 treatments.²⁰

Quality-Switched Lasers
Pigment granules in melanosomes and tattoo particles are targeted with quality-switched (QS) lasers. Typically, a device will contain a combination of QS 532-nm potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) lasers, QS 1064-nm Nd:YAG lasers, and QS 755-nm alexandrite lasers in 1 machine. In general, shorter wavelengths are used to treat epidermal lesions such as ephelides, lentigines, and café-au-lait macules. Longer wavelengths are used to treat deeper lesions such as nevus of Ota. A 2017 review suggested that café-au-lait macules with ragged borders (so-called coast of Maine borders) may respond well to QS lasers.²¹

Ablative Lasers
The 10,600-nm CO₂ laser and 2940-nm erbium:YAG laser can be used to debulk superficial tumors such as lymphangiomas, syringomas, angiofibromas, and xanthomas.²² These treatments have a higher risk for scarring than other lasers, so it is important to have a good understanding of desired clinical end points before using these devices.

Fractionated Lasers
Fractionated lasers can be nonablative (several devices are available in the 1410- to 1927-nm range) or ablative (CO₂ or erbium:YAG). In pediatrics, they are usually used to treat burn scars, traumatic scars, and mild to moderate acne scarring.²² The most common side effects from fractionated lasers are prolonged erythema or hyperpigmentation. In addition, it typically takes at least 3 treatments to notice improvements.

Excisions

Pediatric procedural dermatologists remove a variety of unique lesions through excision. A few tips are provided for some of the more common lesions that may be excised in children.

Accessory Tragi
Prior to excising an accessory tragus, the surgeon should consider documenting a facial nerve examination, as accessory tragi can be associated with complete or partial facial nerve dysfunction. Additionally, there usually is an underlying cartilage structure present within the tragus. The cartilage stalk also should be addressed during the excision to avoid a continued palpable deformity after excision.

Dermoid Cysts
Dermoid cysts are the most commonly diagnosed benign orbital lesion in children.²³ Exophytic periorbital lesions, which extend outside the orbital rim, can be removed through an infrabrow incision. Endophytic periorbital lesions, which are inside the orbital rim, should be removed through a crease incision. Midline lesions may have an intracranial extension and should be imaged through MRI and/or a computed tomography.²⁴ Because dermoid cysts usually are located below the orbicularis oculi muscle, the muscle should be fixed with a suture prior to closing with skin sutures.

Pilomatricomas
Typically, a linear incision is made overlying the lesion, and then the underlying tumor is removed with sharp or blunt dissection. However, if the overlying skin has been stretched thin, a lenticular excision that includes the thinned skin may improve cosmesis.

Congenital Nevi
Large congenital nevi typically are removed through staged excisions. Lower extremity lesions are best removed before 10 months of age or before walking begins to minimize wound tension. However, if the procedure is not performed in infancy, it is best to wait until walking becomes stable.²⁵ In older children, it is advisable to splint the affected lower extremity for 2 weeks to prevent dehiscence. The interval between excisions typically is 4 to 6 weeks for small lesions and 3 months for larger nevi.

Conclusion

Procedural pediatric dermatology is a broad and emerging field. As this article highlights, children are not small versions of adults and have unique biology, diseases, therapies, social situations, and ethical challenges from adults. This article provides a superficial overview of some of the more common issues faced by pediatric dermatologists and providers who perform procedures on infants, children, and teenagers. Readers who are interested in obtaining a more in-depth understanding of procedural pediatric dermatology should look at Procedural Pediatric Dermatology,¹ the first textbook to provide expert opinion and evidence-based information on procedural management of pediatric skin conditions.

Performing dermatologic procedures in infants, children, and teenagers presents many unique challenges. There may be unique diagnoses, different instruments, differences in skin biology, or different approaches to pain management and anesthesia; the inclusion of a third party (caregivers) in decision processes; or a need to assess maturity level or to optimize outcomes over the patient’s lifetime. The field of pediatric procedural dermatology is broad. This article reviews some of the more common procedures performed by pediatric dermatologists and some of the more common ethical and quality-of-life (QOL) considerations one might face in procedural pediatric dermatology. (The textbook Procedural Pediatric Dermatology¹ offers a thorough discussion of this topic.)

Quality of Life

More often than not, procedures are performed in pediatric dermatology to improve QOL rather than to prevent morbidity or mortality. In the case of many self-limited conditions, such as ingrown nails or pyogenic granulomas, it is clear that intervention will improve the patient’s QOL. In the case of warts and molluscum contagiosum, emotional, social, and cultural considerations play a large role in determining whether an intervention will improve QOL. Finally, some conditions, such as genodermatoses, giant congenital melanocytic nevi, and large vascular malformations, may be associated with additional systemic symptoms and may not have good treatment options for cure. In these cases, procedural interventions will result in a mixture of positive and negative QOL outcomes that can occur at the same time.

Bemmels et al² published a qualitative study that provides a good foundation for understanding the positive and negative effects of procedural interventions on children and teenagers. In their study, children and teenagers who underwent reconstructive surgery for craniofacial differences noted improved self-esteem and reduced stigmatization. However, they also experienced negative outcomes, including an addiction to attaining a perfect surgical face, missing school for treatments, difficulty adjusting to an evolving appearance, anxiety related to not knowing when treatments will end, and experiencing stigma related to undergoing surgery.² Thus, a comprehensive plan for the management of children who need ongoing procedures should include some level of psychosocial support. Two good references on supporting young patients with visible differences include CBT for Appearance Anxiety: Psychosocial Interventions for Anxiety Due to Visible Difference³ and Reaching Teens: Strength-Based, Trauma-Sensitive, Resilience-Building Communication Strategies Rooted in Positive Youth Development.⁴

Ethics

Ethical decisions in pediatric procedural dermatology differ from adult dermatology in 3 major ways: (1) the involvement of a third party (ie, parents or legal guardians), (2) the need to assess the maturity of the patient, and (3) the need to know local laws in the jurisdiction in which care is being provided. Ethical dilemmas occur when the desires of the child, parents/guardians, and dermatologist are not in alignment. In these cases, it is important to be prepared with a moral or ethical framework to guide decision-making when conflicts occur. Two great resources are the best interest standard⁵ and the publication entitled, “Informed Consent in Decision-making in Pediatric Practice,” from the American Academy of Pediatrics.⁶

In pediatrics, it often is better to conceptualize medical decision-making as a combination of informed permission and assent of the patient rather than informed consent. Informed permission describes how a parent or surrogate makes decisions for the child or adolescent and is similar to informed consent. A parent’s informed permission may be in conflict with a child’s wishes, but it is assumed that the parent is acting in the best interest of the child. Assent of the patient is the process of obtaining a minor’s agreement to undergo an intervention even though he/she may lack legal authority or decision-making capacity to provide standard informed consent. It is important to respect the child’s right to assent to interventions to the extent that their maturity level permits to develop trust with the dermatologist and medical encounters in general.

These differences emphasize an active process in which the patient, caregiver, and physician are all involved in the health care process and allow for increasing inclusion of the child as is developmentally appropriate. In the end, however, parents have the legal authority to give or withhold permission for a procedure.⁷ When this conflicts with a child’s dissent, the dermatologist will need to objectively explore the reasons for the conflict and decide if a procedure is not in the child’s best interests. If a mutual understanding cannot be reached between the dermatologist and parents, obtaining a second opinion is a good option.⁸

Common Diagnoses

The most common diagnoses unique to procedural pediatric dermatology include congenital melanocytic nevi, vascular anomalies, midline lesions, epidermal nevi, and pilomatricomas. Prior to intervening on these lesions, it is important to consider evaluating for associated diseases.

Congenital Melanocytic Nevi
Nevus Outreach has published best practices for the management of congenital melanocytic nevi.⁹ In newborns with a congenital melanocytic nevus greater than 3 cm in diameter or more than 20 satellite lesions, it is recommended that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and spine with and without gadolinium contrast be obtained before 6 months of age. Within the first 6 months of life, these children also should see ophthalmologists, neurologists, pediatric dermatologists, and plastic surgeons. These early referrals will help to establish a baseline for the patient and plan for possible interventions, if needed. Additionally, before 3 years of age, every child should be referred to psychology, even if he/she is asymptomatic.¹⁰

Vascular Anomalies
Prior to intervening on a vascular anomaly, it is important to accurately classify the lesion. Once the lesion is classified, an evaluation and treatment plan can be developed. The International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies has published a detailed classification guide that is a useful starting point in the management of vascular anomalies.¹¹ Once a diagnosis is confirmed, further evaluation may include imaging, specialty referrals, genetic testing, biopsy, or blood tests, and a pediatric dermatologist usually helps to coordinate the care of patients with complex vascular anomalies.

Midline Lesions
Certain lesions in the midline may have a higher risk for neural tube dysraphism, and imaging should be performed prior to any procedural intervention.¹² Midline cutaneous findings that are highly likely to be associated with dysraphism are lipomas, acrochordons, pseudotails, true tails, aplasia cutis congenita, congenital scars, dermoid cysts, dermoid sinuses, and infantile hemangiomas that are greater than 2.5 cm in diameter. An MRI should be performed for all high-risk lesions. Intermediate-risk lesions are atypical dimples (>5 mm in diameter or >2.5 cm from the anal verge), hemangiomas less than 2.5 cm in diameter, and hypertrichosis. An ultrasound can screen for spinal dysraphism in these cases as long as imaging is performed prior to 6 months of age. If the child is older than 6 months, an MRI should be performed. Low-risk lesions that do not require imaging are simple dimples, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, melanocytic nevi, port-wine stains, and telangiectases.

Epidermal Nevi
Children with epidermal nevi should have a complete physical examination, focusing on the skeletal system, central nervous system, and eyes. There are no specifically recommended imaging studies or referrals; however, several diagnostic clues can aid in the diagnosis of an epidermal nevus syndrome¹³:

• Schimmelpenning syndrome: extensive nevus sebaceous and bowing or pain in the legs after 2 years of age

• Phacomatosis pigmentokeratotica: nevus sebaceous and nevus spilus

• Nevus comedonicus syndrome: ipsilateral cataract

• Angora hair nevus syndrome: soft white hair within the nevus

• Becker nevus syndrome: breast hypoplasia

• Proteus syndrome: cerebriform plantar changes

• PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum: lipomas, macrodactyly, and/or vascular malformations

• Congenital hemidysplasia with ichthyosiform erythroderma and limb defects: inflammatory epidermal nevi, lateralization, ptychotropism, and ipsilateral limb defects

• Conradi-Hünermann-Happle syndrome: scaly red epidermal nevi without hair follicles and asymmetric limb shortening

Pilomatricomas
In addition to the tent sign—an angulated shape can be appreciated by stretching the skin overlying pilomatricomas—diagnosis of pilomatricoma can be confirmed by transillumination with an otoscope. In this case, a dark shadow typically is cast distal to where the otoscope touches the skin.¹⁴ In the case of multiple lesions, the patient should be evaluated for signs of myotonic dystrophy, Turner syndrome, and Gardner syndrome.¹⁵

Common Procedures

Pulsed Dye Laser
The pulsed dye laser is the most common laser used for red-colored lesions such as port-wine stains, facial telangiectases, and superficial hemangiomas. It also can be used to treat erythematous scars, verrucae, and psoriasis. In large vascular lesions, it typically is employed at 0.45 to 10 milliseconds every 4 to 6 weeks for 10 or more treatments. Port-wine stains preferably are treated within the first few months of life to provide the most fading without the need for general anesthesia.¹⁶ On the other hand, systemic therapy with propranolol is preferred over lasers for infantile hemangiomas.¹⁷

Long-Pulsed Alexandrite Laser (755 nm)
The alexandrite laser often is used to treat deeper vascular lesions such as venous lakes and hypertrophic port-wine stains. The operator needs to be cautious, as this laser has a higher incidence of scarring at the settings used to treat vascular lesions (typically fluences around 60–85 J/cm²).¹⁸ It also may be used for hair reduction in disorders with hypertrichosis or hidradenitis suppurativa.¹⁹

Long-Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser
The long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser also can be used to treat deep vascular lesions and remove unwanted hair. Because of its low window of safety in the treatment of vascular lesions, the alexandrite laser usually is preferred. However, it is the preferred laser for treatment of unwanted hair and hidradenitis suppurativa in darker skin types. It often provides a 50% reduction in hair density after 9 treatments.²⁰

Quality-Switched Lasers
Pigment granules in melanosomes and tattoo particles are targeted with quality-switched (QS) lasers. Typically, a device will contain a combination of QS 532-nm potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) lasers, QS 1064-nm Nd:YAG lasers, and QS 755-nm alexandrite lasers in 1 machine. In general, shorter wavelengths are used to treat epidermal lesions such as ephelides, lentigines, and café-au-lait macules. Longer wavelengths are used to treat deeper lesions such as nevus of Ota. A 2017 review suggested that café-au-lait macules with ragged borders (so-called coast of Maine borders) may respond well to QS lasers.²¹

Ablative Lasers
The 10,600-nm CO₂ laser and 2940-nm erbium:YAG laser can be used to debulk superficial tumors such as lymphangiomas, syringomas, angiofibromas, and xanthomas.²² These treatments have a higher risk for scarring than other lasers, so it is important to have a good understanding of desired clinical end points before using these devices.

Fractionated Lasers
Fractionated lasers can be nonablative (several devices are available in the 1410- to 1927-nm range) or ablative (CO₂ or erbium:YAG). In pediatrics, they are usually used to treat burn scars, traumatic scars, and mild to moderate acne scarring.²² The most common side effects from fractionated lasers are prolonged erythema or hyperpigmentation. In addition, it typically takes at least 3 treatments to notice improvements.

Excisions

Pediatric procedural dermatologists remove a variety of unique lesions through excision. A few tips are provided for some of the more common lesions that may be excised in children.

Accessory Tragi
Prior to excising an accessory tragus, the surgeon should consider documenting a facial nerve examination, as accessory tragi can be associated with complete or partial facial nerve dysfunction. Additionally, there usually is an underlying cartilage structure present within the tragus. The cartilage stalk also should be addressed during the excision to avoid a continued palpable deformity after excision.

Dermoid Cysts
Dermoid cysts are the most commonly diagnosed benign orbital lesion in children.²³ Exophytic periorbital lesions, which extend outside the orbital rim, can be removed through an infrabrow incision. Endophytic periorbital lesions, which are inside the orbital rim, should be removed through a crease incision. Midline lesions may have an intracranial extension and should be imaged through MRI and/or a computed tomography.²⁴ Because dermoid cysts usually are located below the orbicularis oculi muscle, the muscle should be fixed with a suture prior to closing with skin sutures.

Pilomatricomas
Typically, a linear incision is made overlying the lesion, and then the underlying tumor is removed with sharp or blunt dissection. However, if the overlying skin has been stretched thin, a lenticular excision that includes the thinned skin may improve cosmesis.

Congenital Nevi
Large congenital nevi typically are removed through staged excisions. Lower extremity lesions are best removed before 10 months of age or before walking begins to minimize wound tension. However, if the procedure is not performed in infancy, it is best to wait until walking becomes stable.²⁵ In older children, it is advisable to splint the affected lower extremity for 2 weeks to prevent dehiscence. The interval between excisions typically is 4 to 6 weeks for small lesions and 3 months for larger nevi.

Conclusion

Procedural pediatric dermatology is a broad and emerging field. As this article highlights, children are not small versions of adults and have unique biology, diseases, therapies, social situations, and ethical challenges from adults. This article provides a superficial overview of some of the more common issues faced by pediatric dermatologists and providers who perform procedures on infants, children, and teenagers. Readers who are interested in obtaining a more in-depth understanding of procedural pediatric dermatology should look at Procedural Pediatric Dermatology,¹ the first textbook to provide expert opinion and evidence-based information on procedural management of pediatric skin conditions.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is one of the most important treatment options for acute leukemias. However, posttransplant cancer recurrence remains a continuing issue. And while there are reasons to think that hypomethylating agents (HMAS) could be helpful as maintenance tools to prevent cancer recurrence after HCT in leukemia, a hematologist/oncologist told colleagues that the treatment isn’t yet ready for prime time.

“I don’t think you can prefer hypomethylating agents over anything right now. Unfortunately, there’s no data that we can hang our hat on that says they are of benefit in the posttransplant setting,” said Frederick Appelbaum, MD, executive vice president and deputy director of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, in a presentation at the virtual Acute Leukemia Forum of Hemedicus.

However, there’s still plenty of room for improvement for patients following HCT, he said, pointing to the findings of a 2020 study. The report, which he cowrote, found that 200-day mortality after HCT fell by a third from 2003-2007 to 2013-20017, but also noted that “relapse of cancer remains the largest obstacle to better survival outcomes.”

Dr. Appelbaum described the findings this way: “Without a doubt, the major limitation to transplants for hematologic malignancies today is disease recurrence,” he said. “In fact, if you look at patients after day 100, over 60% of the reason for failure is tumor regrowth. Thus, people are very anxious to look at any method that we can to prevent posttransplant relapse, including the use of hypomethylating agents.”

In regard to strategy, “we don’t have to get rid of every last leukemic cell. Just delaying recurrence might be enough,” he said. “If you can keep the patient from relapsing for the first 3 months, and then take the brakes off the immune suppression and allow immunity to regrow, that may be enough to allow increased numbers of patients to be cured of their disease.”
 

A potential role

Why might HMAS be a possible option after transplant? They do appear to play a role after chemotherapy, he said, pointing to four 2019 studies: One that examined decitabine and three that examined azacytidine: Here, here, and here.

“These four studies provide convincing evidence that hypomethylating-agent therapy after conventional chemotherapy may either prevent or delay relapse when given as maintenance,” Dr. Appelbaum said.

If HMAS work after standard chemotherapy, why might they fail to work after transplantation? “For one, by the time the disease has been able to go through chemotherapy and transplant, you’re left with highly resistant cells,” he said. “Therefore, hypomethylating agents may not be enough to get rid of the disease. Secondly, any of you who have tried to give a maintenance therapy after transplantation know how difficult it can be with CMV [cytomegalovirus] reactivation, count suppression with ganciclovir, graft-versus-host disease [GVHD] causing nausea and vomiting, diarrhea and renal dysfunction caused by calcineurin inhibitors. These are daily events during the first 3 months after transplantation, making drug administration difficult.”

In addition, he said, “even if you can give the drug, the clinical and disease variability may make it very difficult to detect an effect.”

In another study, researchers “did make a valiant attempt to study azacitidine in the posttransplant setting by randomizing 181 patients to either azacitidine or observation,” Dr. Appelbaum said. “Unfortunately, as they reported in 2018, they could not detect a difference in either disease-free or overall survival.”

The researchers reported that nearly 75% of patients in the azacitidine arm failed to complete the planned 12 cycles of treatment, he said. “The reasons for stopping the drug were pretty profound. Half of the patients stopped because they relapsed. Others had stopped because of grades three or four toxicity, death, or severe GVHD or significant infections. It is very difficult to give the drug.”

In the future, “if we truly want to optimize the benefit of using hypomethylating agents after transplantation, it’s going to be very important for us to understand how they work,” he said. “Understanding that would then help us to select which drug we should use, what the dosing and schedule might be, and also to select patients that might benefit from it. Unfortunately, right now, it’s pretty much of a black box. We don’t really understand the effects of hypomethylating agents in the posttransplant period.”

Still, he added, “without question, the results that we have seen with the use of hypomethylating agents after conventional chemotherapy – prolonging disease-free and, probably, overall survival – are going to provide a very, very strong stimulus to study hypomethylating agents after transplantation as well.”

Dr. Appelbaum reports no disclosures.

The Acute Leukemia Forum is held by Hemedicus, which is owned by the same company as this news organization.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is one of the most important treatment options for acute leukemias. However, posttransplant cancer recurrence remains a continuing issue. And while there are reasons to think that hypomethylating agents (HMAS) could be helpful as maintenance tools to prevent cancer recurrence after HCT in leukemia, a hematologist/oncologist told colleagues that the treatment isn’t yet ready for prime time.

“I don’t think you can prefer hypomethylating agents over anything right now. Unfortunately, there’s no data that we can hang our hat on that says they are of benefit in the posttransplant setting,” said Frederick Appelbaum, MD, executive vice president and deputy director of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, in a presentation at the virtual Acute Leukemia Forum of Hemedicus.

However, there’s still plenty of room for improvement for patients following HCT, he said, pointing to the findings of a 2020 study. The report, which he cowrote, found that 200-day mortality after HCT fell by a third from 2003-2007 to 2013-20017, but also noted that “relapse of cancer remains the largest obstacle to better survival outcomes.”

Dr. Appelbaum described the findings this way: “Without a doubt, the major limitation to transplants for hematologic malignancies today is disease recurrence,” he said. “In fact, if you look at patients after day 100, over 60% of the reason for failure is tumor regrowth. Thus, people are very anxious to look at any method that we can to prevent posttransplant relapse, including the use of hypomethylating agents.”

In regard to strategy, “we don’t have to get rid of every last leukemic cell. Just delaying recurrence might be enough,” he said. “If you can keep the patient from relapsing for the first 3 months, and then take the brakes off the immune suppression and allow immunity to regrow, that may be enough to allow increased numbers of patients to be cured of their disease.”
 

A potential role

Why might HMAS be a possible option after transplant? They do appear to play a role after chemotherapy, he said, pointing to four 2019 studies: One that examined decitabine and three that examined azacytidine: Here, here, and here.

“These four studies provide convincing evidence that hypomethylating-agent therapy after conventional chemotherapy may either prevent or delay relapse when given as maintenance,” Dr. Appelbaum said.

If HMAS work after standard chemotherapy, why might they fail to work after transplantation? “For one, by the time the disease has been able to go through chemotherapy and transplant, you’re left with highly resistant cells,” he said. “Therefore, hypomethylating agents may not be enough to get rid of the disease. Secondly, any of you who have tried to give a maintenance therapy after transplantation know how difficult it can be with CMV [cytomegalovirus] reactivation, count suppression with ganciclovir, graft-versus-host disease [GVHD] causing nausea and vomiting, diarrhea and renal dysfunction caused by calcineurin inhibitors. These are daily events during the first 3 months after transplantation, making drug administration difficult.”

In addition, he said, “even if you can give the drug, the clinical and disease variability may make it very difficult to detect an effect.”

In another study, researchers “did make a valiant attempt to study azacitidine in the posttransplant setting by randomizing 181 patients to either azacitidine or observation,” Dr. Appelbaum said. “Unfortunately, as they reported in 2018, they could not detect a difference in either disease-free or overall survival.”

The researchers reported that nearly 75% of patients in the azacitidine arm failed to complete the planned 12 cycles of treatment, he said. “The reasons for stopping the drug were pretty profound. Half of the patients stopped because they relapsed. Others had stopped because of grades three or four toxicity, death, or severe GVHD or significant infections. It is very difficult to give the drug.”

In the future, “if we truly want to optimize the benefit of using hypomethylating agents after transplantation, it’s going to be very important for us to understand how they work,” he said. “Understanding that would then help us to select which drug we should use, what the dosing and schedule might be, and also to select patients that might benefit from it. Unfortunately, right now, it’s pretty much of a black box. We don’t really understand the effects of hypomethylating agents in the posttransplant period.”

Still, he added, “without question, the results that we have seen with the use of hypomethylating agents after conventional chemotherapy – prolonging disease-free and, probably, overall survival – are going to provide a very, very strong stimulus to study hypomethylating agents after transplantation as well.”

Dr. Appelbaum reports no disclosures.

The Acute Leukemia Forum is held by Hemedicus, which is owned by the same company as this news organization.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is one of the most important treatment options for acute leukemias. However, posttransplant cancer recurrence remains a continuing issue. And while there are reasons to think that hypomethylating agents (HMAS) could be helpful as maintenance tools to prevent cancer recurrence after HCT in leukemia, a hematologist/oncologist told colleagues that the treatment isn’t yet ready for prime time.

“I don’t think you can prefer hypomethylating agents over anything right now. Unfortunately, there’s no data that we can hang our hat on that says they are of benefit in the posttransplant setting,” said Frederick Appelbaum, MD, executive vice president and deputy director of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, in a presentation at the virtual Acute Leukemia Forum of Hemedicus.

However, there’s still plenty of room for improvement for patients following HCT, he said, pointing to the findings of a 2020 study. The report, which he cowrote, found that 200-day mortality after HCT fell by a third from 2003-2007 to 2013-20017, but also noted that “relapse of cancer remains the largest obstacle to better survival outcomes.”

Dr. Appelbaum described the findings this way: “Without a doubt, the major limitation to transplants for hematologic malignancies today is disease recurrence,” he said. “In fact, if you look at patients after day 100, over 60% of the reason for failure is tumor regrowth. Thus, people are very anxious to look at any method that we can to prevent posttransplant relapse, including the use of hypomethylating agents.”

In regard to strategy, “we don’t have to get rid of every last leukemic cell. Just delaying recurrence might be enough,” he said. “If you can keep the patient from relapsing for the first 3 months, and then take the brakes off the immune suppression and allow immunity to regrow, that may be enough to allow increased numbers of patients to be cured of their disease.”
 

A potential role

Why might HMAS be a possible option after transplant? They do appear to play a role after chemotherapy, he said, pointing to four 2019 studies: One that examined decitabine and three that examined azacytidine: Here, here, and here.

“These four studies provide convincing evidence that hypomethylating-agent therapy after conventional chemotherapy may either prevent or delay relapse when given as maintenance,” Dr. Appelbaum said.

If HMAS work after standard chemotherapy, why might they fail to work after transplantation? “For one, by the time the disease has been able to go through chemotherapy and transplant, you’re left with highly resistant cells,” he said. “Therefore, hypomethylating agents may not be enough to get rid of the disease. Secondly, any of you who have tried to give a maintenance therapy after transplantation know how difficult it can be with CMV [cytomegalovirus] reactivation, count suppression with ganciclovir, graft-versus-host disease [GVHD] causing nausea and vomiting, diarrhea and renal dysfunction caused by calcineurin inhibitors. These are daily events during the first 3 months after transplantation, making drug administration difficult.”

In addition, he said, “even if you can give the drug, the clinical and disease variability may make it very difficult to detect an effect.”

In another study, researchers “did make a valiant attempt to study azacitidine in the posttransplant setting by randomizing 181 patients to either azacitidine or observation,” Dr. Appelbaum said. “Unfortunately, as they reported in 2018, they could not detect a difference in either disease-free or overall survival.”

The researchers reported that nearly 75% of patients in the azacitidine arm failed to complete the planned 12 cycles of treatment, he said. “The reasons for stopping the drug were pretty profound. Half of the patients stopped because they relapsed. Others had stopped because of grades three or four toxicity, death, or severe GVHD or significant infections. It is very difficult to give the drug.”

In the future, “if we truly want to optimize the benefit of using hypomethylating agents after transplantation, it’s going to be very important for us to understand how they work,” he said. “Understanding that would then help us to select which drug we should use, what the dosing and schedule might be, and also to select patients that might benefit from it. Unfortunately, right now, it’s pretty much of a black box. We don’t really understand the effects of hypomethylating agents in the posttransplant period.”

Still, he added, “without question, the results that we have seen with the use of hypomethylating agents after conventional chemotherapy – prolonging disease-free and, probably, overall survival – are going to provide a very, very strong stimulus to study hypomethylating agents after transplantation as well.”

Dr. Appelbaum reports no disclosures.

The Acute Leukemia Forum is held by Hemedicus, which is owned by the same company as this news organization.

As our specialty seeks to address its lack of racial diversity, many dermatologists have answered recent calls to action.^1,2 As we work toward dismantling systemic issues that have created pervasive inequality in our residency application review and interview processes, consideration also should be given to psychosocial issues that underrepresented-in-medicine (UIM) students face before their applications come to our attention. In this article, we explore how potential differences in the social capital of UIM and other disadvantaged dermatology residency applicants contribute to persistent homogeneity among dermatology training programs and the workforce.

The Theory of Capital

The concepts of economic, social, and cultural capital originate from the writings of social theorist Pierre Bourdieu.³ All 3 forms of capital are interconnected, and they relate to each other in ways that often facilitate social division and inequality. Economic capital denotes an individual’s economic resources or wealth, while cultural capital refers to the knowledge, behaviors, and skills that demonstrate his/her economic class (eg, communication style, table manners).³ Social capital refers to an individual’s interpersonal connections in personal and professional settings and can be subdivided into 3 categories: bonds, bridges, and linkages.^4,5 Herein, we will focus on bonds and bridges.

It has been suggested that bonds are important for “getting by,” while bridges are critical for “getting ahead.”⁵ Bonds refer to close relationships within a community of people with shared characteristics, such as racial/ethnic identity and culture, access to information, and resources (eg, family, friends). These bonds provide trust, safety, and financial and emotional support; however, they are considered to be inward-looking and can promote exclusion and homogeneity.⁵

On the other hand, bridges refer to social relationships that extend outward beyond one’s close circle of family and friends to other people with shared interests and goals who may have different social or cultural identities (eg, professional colleagues). These bridges are considered to be outward-looking and provide many benefits to individuals and society. They link diverse individuals, which tends to increase tolerance and disrupt stereotypes, and they facilitate the sharing of ideas, information, and innovation. Additionally, bridges between individuals from different networks facilitate access to increased resources and opportunities for all parties.⁵

The 3 forms of capital are inextricably linked. For example, with economic capital, a child’s family can purchase access to a prestigious private high school, where he/she will gain valuable social capital through bridges with other students and their families. At this school, the child also will accumulate cultural capital that increases his/her sense of belonging in these circles. Subsequently, both the social and cultural capital accumulated at this private high school can be exchanged for economic capital via social networks, skills, values, and behaviors that facilitate entry into higher education and professional training. As such, these 3 forms of capital work together to continue social/class divisions, hierarchies, and ultimately inequality.

Impact of Social Capital in Pursuing a Medical Career

For medical students whose bonds (ie, close family, friends) include physicians or other health care professionals, the journey to studying medicine and entering their chosen specialty will be facilitated by financial security, valuable “inside information” about the application process, study skills, and even clinical guidance. Additionally, these students will have access to professional networks for mentorship, shadowing experiences, and other potential advantages. Furthermore, social capital is associated with higher self-esteem,⁶ which likely improves academic performance and wards off imposter syndrome in these students.

For medical students from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds or those whose inner circles do not include physicians or other health care professionals, accumulating the social and cultural capital needed to successfully navigate a medical career is more difficult. Although they may receive support and encouragement from family and friends, they will not have access to the same valuable information and connections that facilitate success; rather, they will have a further distance to travel, and this distance should be acknowledged in the residency application review process.

Acquiring Social Capital as a UIM Student

Despite the benefits of social and cultural capital, acquiring them takes a toll. For those UIM students who start life from a disadvantaged place, the accumulation of social capital does not come easily; rather, it demands effort and time that has the potential to detract from a student’s focus on the academic demands of medical education.⁷ Programs that attempt to improve disadvantaged students’ access to credible information, role models, and mentors can help lift some of the burden from the individual student’s shoulders. For example, studies have demonstrated the benefits of harnessing technology to enhance mentorship programs that increase social capital of disadvantaged populations.^8-11 This approach already is in progress, bolstered by advances made in digital communications during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.¹² Student-led networking groups that connect remotely have been shown to build social capital bonds and bridges that facilitate collaborative learning, relationship building, and information sharing.^8-11 There are existing online UIM student networks that individual dermatologists, institutions, and national organizations can partner with to facilitate the construction of bridges between these UIM student groups and dermatologists who can provide accurate, high-yield information and professional networking; however, one limitation of this suggestion is the disparate access to technology in the UIM community.

Final Thoughts

It is important to note that assumptions should not be made about the level of economic, social, or cultural capital an individual possesses based on his/her race or ethnicity. Instead, mentors should attempt to be available to a diverse pool of students; take the time to get to know these students; and then provide the types of mentorship, information, exposure, and networking that each individual student needs. Another approach is to make a concerted effort to ensure that all students receive the same amount and quality of information about medical education and our specialty regardless of their level of economic, cultural, or social capital. Moreover, beyond the promotion of diversity through increasing numbers of UIM applicants, we should seek to reshape our specialty into a space that does not require students to subdue their existing diverse forms of capital but rather to bring these different perspectives and lived experiences to the table.¹³

As our specialty seeks to address its lack of racial diversity, many dermatologists have answered recent calls to action.^1,2 As we work toward dismantling systemic issues that have created pervasive inequality in our residency application review and interview processes, consideration also should be given to psychosocial issues that underrepresented-in-medicine (UIM) students face before their applications come to our attention. In this article, we explore how potential differences in the social capital of UIM and other disadvantaged dermatology residency applicants contribute to persistent homogeneity among dermatology training programs and the workforce.

The Theory of Capital

The concepts of economic, social, and cultural capital originate from the writings of social theorist Pierre Bourdieu.³ All 3 forms of capital are interconnected, and they relate to each other in ways that often facilitate social division and inequality. Economic capital denotes an individual’s economic resources or wealth, while cultural capital refers to the knowledge, behaviors, and skills that demonstrate his/her economic class (eg, communication style, table manners).³ Social capital refers to an individual’s interpersonal connections in personal and professional settings and can be subdivided into 3 categories: bonds, bridges, and linkages.^4,5 Herein, we will focus on bonds and bridges.

It has been suggested that bonds are important for “getting by,” while bridges are critical for “getting ahead.”⁵ Bonds refer to close relationships within a community of people with shared characteristics, such as racial/ethnic identity and culture, access to information, and resources (eg, family, friends). These bonds provide trust, safety, and financial and emotional support; however, they are considered to be inward-looking and can promote exclusion and homogeneity.⁵

On the other hand, bridges refer to social relationships that extend outward beyond one’s close circle of family and friends to other people with shared interests and goals who may have different social or cultural identities (eg, professional colleagues). These bridges are considered to be outward-looking and provide many benefits to individuals and society. They link diverse individuals, which tends to increase tolerance and disrupt stereotypes, and they facilitate the sharing of ideas, information, and innovation. Additionally, bridges between individuals from different networks facilitate access to increased resources and opportunities for all parties.⁵

The 3 forms of capital are inextricably linked. For example, with economic capital, a child’s family can purchase access to a prestigious private high school, where he/she will gain valuable social capital through bridges with other students and their families. At this school, the child also will accumulate cultural capital that increases his/her sense of belonging in these circles. Subsequently, both the social and cultural capital accumulated at this private high school can be exchanged for economic capital via social networks, skills, values, and behaviors that facilitate entry into higher education and professional training. As such, these 3 forms of capital work together to continue social/class divisions, hierarchies, and ultimately inequality.

Impact of Social Capital in Pursuing a Medical Career

For medical students whose bonds (ie, close family, friends) include physicians or other health care professionals, the journey to studying medicine and entering their chosen specialty will be facilitated by financial security, valuable “inside information” about the application process, study skills, and even clinical guidance. Additionally, these students will have access to professional networks for mentorship, shadowing experiences, and other potential advantages. Furthermore, social capital is associated with higher self-esteem,⁶ which likely improves academic performance and wards off imposter syndrome in these students.

For medical students from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds or those whose inner circles do not include physicians or other health care professionals, accumulating the social and cultural capital needed to successfully navigate a medical career is more difficult. Although they may receive support and encouragement from family and friends, they will not have access to the same valuable information and connections that facilitate success; rather, they will have a further distance to travel, and this distance should be acknowledged in the residency application review process.

Acquiring Social Capital as a UIM Student

Despite the benefits of social and cultural capital, acquiring them takes a toll. For those UIM students who start life from a disadvantaged place, the accumulation of social capital does not come easily; rather, it demands effort and time that has the potential to detract from a student’s focus on the academic demands of medical education.⁷ Programs that attempt to improve disadvantaged students’ access to credible information, role models, and mentors can help lift some of the burden from the individual student’s shoulders. For example, studies have demonstrated the benefits of harnessing technology to enhance mentorship programs that increase social capital of disadvantaged populations.^8-11 This approach already is in progress, bolstered by advances made in digital communications during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.¹² Student-led networking groups that connect remotely have been shown to build social capital bonds and bridges that facilitate collaborative learning, relationship building, and information sharing.^8-11 There are existing online UIM student networks that individual dermatologists, institutions, and national organizations can partner with to facilitate the construction of bridges between these UIM student groups and dermatologists who can provide accurate, high-yield information and professional networking; however, one limitation of this suggestion is the disparate access to technology in the UIM community.

Final Thoughts

It is important to note that assumptions should not be made about the level of economic, social, or cultural capital an individual possesses based on his/her race or ethnicity. Instead, mentors should attempt to be available to a diverse pool of students; take the time to get to know these students; and then provide the types of mentorship, information, exposure, and networking that each individual student needs. Another approach is to make a concerted effort to ensure that all students receive the same amount and quality of information about medical education and our specialty regardless of their level of economic, cultural, or social capital. Moreover, beyond the promotion of diversity through increasing numbers of UIM applicants, we should seek to reshape our specialty into a space that does not require students to subdue their existing diverse forms of capital but rather to bring these different perspectives and lived experiences to the table.¹³

As our specialty seeks to address its lack of racial diversity, many dermatologists have answered recent calls to action.^1,2 As we work toward dismantling systemic issues that have created pervasive inequality in our residency application review and interview processes, consideration also should be given to psychosocial issues that underrepresented-in-medicine (UIM) students face before their applications come to our attention. In this article, we explore how potential differences in the social capital of UIM and other disadvantaged dermatology residency applicants contribute to persistent homogeneity among dermatology training programs and the workforce.

The Theory of Capital

The concepts of economic, social, and cultural capital originate from the writings of social theorist Pierre Bourdieu.³ All 3 forms of capital are interconnected, and they relate to each other in ways that often facilitate social division and inequality. Economic capital denotes an individual’s economic resources or wealth, while cultural capital refers to the knowledge, behaviors, and skills that demonstrate his/her economic class (eg, communication style, table manners).³ Social capital refers to an individual’s interpersonal connections in personal and professional settings and can be subdivided into 3 categories: bonds, bridges, and linkages.^4,5 Herein, we will focus on bonds and bridges.

It has been suggested that bonds are important for “getting by,” while bridges are critical for “getting ahead.”⁵ Bonds refer to close relationships within a community of people with shared characteristics, such as racial/ethnic identity and culture, access to information, and resources (eg, family, friends). These bonds provide trust, safety, and financial and emotional support; however, they are considered to be inward-looking and can promote exclusion and homogeneity.⁵

On the other hand, bridges refer to social relationships that extend outward beyond one’s close circle of family and friends to other people with shared interests and goals who may have different social or cultural identities (eg, professional colleagues). These bridges are considered to be outward-looking and provide many benefits to individuals and society. They link diverse individuals, which tends to increase tolerance and disrupt stereotypes, and they facilitate the sharing of ideas, information, and innovation. Additionally, bridges between individuals from different networks facilitate access to increased resources and opportunities for all parties.⁵

The 3 forms of capital are inextricably linked. For example, with economic capital, a child’s family can purchase access to a prestigious private high school, where he/she will gain valuable social capital through bridges with other students and their families. At this school, the child also will accumulate cultural capital that increases his/her sense of belonging in these circles. Subsequently, both the social and cultural capital accumulated at this private high school can be exchanged for economic capital via social networks, skills, values, and behaviors that facilitate entry into higher education and professional training. As such, these 3 forms of capital work together to continue social/class divisions, hierarchies, and ultimately inequality.

Impact of Social Capital in Pursuing a Medical Career

For medical students whose bonds (ie, close family, friends) include physicians or other health care professionals, the journey to studying medicine and entering their chosen specialty will be facilitated by financial security, valuable “inside information” about the application process, study skills, and even clinical guidance. Additionally, these students will have access to professional networks for mentorship, shadowing experiences, and other potential advantages. Furthermore, social capital is associated with higher self-esteem,⁶ which likely improves academic performance and wards off imposter syndrome in these students.

For medical students from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds or those whose inner circles do not include physicians or other health care professionals, accumulating the social and cultural capital needed to successfully navigate a medical career is more difficult. Although they may receive support and encouragement from family and friends, they will not have access to the same valuable information and connections that facilitate success; rather, they will have a further distance to travel, and this distance should be acknowledged in the residency application review process.

Acquiring Social Capital as a UIM Student

Despite the benefits of social and cultural capital, acquiring them takes a toll. For those UIM students who start life from a disadvantaged place, the accumulation of social capital does not come easily; rather, it demands effort and time that has the potential to detract from a student’s focus on the academic demands of medical education.⁷ Programs that attempt to improve disadvantaged students’ access to credible information, role models, and mentors can help lift some of the burden from the individual student’s shoulders. For example, studies have demonstrated the benefits of harnessing technology to enhance mentorship programs that increase social capital of disadvantaged populations.^8-11 This approach already is in progress, bolstered by advances made in digital communications during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.¹² Student-led networking groups that connect remotely have been shown to build social capital bonds and bridges that facilitate collaborative learning, relationship building, and information sharing.^8-11 There are existing online UIM student networks that individual dermatologists, institutions, and national organizations can partner with to facilitate the construction of bridges between these UIM student groups and dermatologists who can provide accurate, high-yield information and professional networking; however, one limitation of this suggestion is the disparate access to technology in the UIM community.

Final Thoughts

It is important to note that assumptions should not be made about the level of economic, social, or cultural capital an individual possesses based on his/her race or ethnicity. Instead, mentors should attempt to be available to a diverse pool of students; take the time to get to know these students; and then provide the types of mentorship, information, exposure, and networking that each individual student needs. Another approach is to make a concerted effort to ensure that all students receive the same amount and quality of information about medical education and our specialty regardless of their level of economic, cultural, or social capital. Moreover, beyond the promotion of diversity through increasing numbers of UIM applicants, we should seek to reshape our specialty into a space that does not require students to subdue their existing diverse forms of capital but rather to bring these different perspectives and lived experiences to the table.¹³

In November 2019, the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) and the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) released their first set of recommendations for the management of pediatric psoriasis.¹ The pediatric guidelines discuss methods of quantifying disease severity in children, triggers and comorbidities, and the efficacy and safety of various therapeutic agents. This review aims to discuss, in a condensed form, special considerations unique to the management of children with psoriasis as presented in the guidelines as well as grade A– and grade B–level treatment recommendations (Table).

Quantifying Psoriasis Severity in Children

Percentage body surface area (BSA) involvement is the most common mode of grading psoriasis severity, with less than 3% BSA involvement being considered mild, 3% to 10% BSA moderate, and more than 10% severe disease. In children, the standard method of measuring BSA is the rule of 9’s: the head and each arm make up 9% of the total BSA, each leg and the front and back of the torso respectively each make up 18%, and the genitalia make up 1%. It also is important to consider impact on quality of life, which may be remarkable in spite of limited BSA involvement. The children’s dermatology life quality index score may be utilized in combination with affected BSA to determine the burden of psoriasis in context of impact on daily life. This metric is available in both written and cartoon form, and it consists of 10 questions that include variables such as severity of itch, impact on social life, and effects on sleep. Most notably, this tool incorporates pruritus,² which generally is addressed inadequately in pediatric psoriasis.

Triggers and Comorbidities in Pediatric Patients

In children, it is important to identify and eliminate modifiable factors that may prompt psoriasis flares. Infections, particularly group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal infections, are a major trigger in neonates and infants. Other exacerbating factors in children include emotional stress, secondhand cigarette smoke, Kawasaki disease, and withdrawal from systemic corticosteroids.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a burdensome comorbidity affecting children with psoriasis. The prevalence of joint disease is 15-times greater in children with psoriasis vs those without,³ and 80% of children with PsA develop rheumatologic symptoms, which typically include oligoarticular disease and dactylitis in infants and girls and enthesitis and axial joint involvement in boys and older children, years prior to the onset of cutaneous disease.⁴ Uveitis often occurs in children with psoriasis and PsA but not in those with isolated cutaneous disease.

Compared to unaffected children, pediatric patients with psoriasis have greater prevalence of metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors during childhood, including central obesity, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, insulin resistance, atherosclerosis, arrythmia, and valvular heart disease. Family history of obesity increases the risk for early-onset development of cutaneous lesions,^5,6 and weight reduction may alleviate severity of psoriasis lesions.⁷ In the United States, many of the metabolic associations observed are particularly robust in Black and Hispanic children vs those of other races. Furthermore, the prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease is 3- to 4-times higher in children with psoriasis compared to those without.

As with other cutaneous diseases, it is important to be aware of social and mental health concerns in children with psoriasis. The majority of pediatric patients with psoriasis experience name-calling, shaming, or bullying, and many have concerns from skin shedding and malodor. Independent risk for depression after the onset of psoriasis is high. Affected older children and adolescents are at increased risk for alcohol and drug abuse as well as eating disorders.

Despite these identified comorbidities, there are no unique screening recommendations for arthritis, ophthalmologic disease, metabolic disease, cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal tract disease, or mental health issues in children with psoriasis. Rather, these patients should be monitored according to the American Academy of Pediatrics or American Diabetes Association guidelines for all pediatric patients.^8,9 Nonetheless, educating patients and guardians about these potential issues may be warranted.

Topical Therapies

For children with mild to moderate psoriasis, topical therapies are first line. Despite being off label, topical corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy for localized psoriatic plaques in children. Topical vitamin D analogues—calcitriol and calcipotriol/calcipotriene—are highly effective and well tolerated, and they frequently are used in combination with topical corticosteroids. Topical calcineurin inhibitors, namely tacrolimus, also are used off label but are considered first line for sensitive regions of the skin in children, including the face, genitalia, and body folds. There currently is limited evidence for supporting the use of the topical vitamin A analogue tazarotene in children with psoriasis, though some consider its off-label use effective for pediatric nail psoriasis. It also may be used as an adjunct to topical corticosteroids to minimize irritation.

Although there is no gold standard topical regimen, combination therapy with a high-potency topical steroid and topical vitamin D analogue commonly is used to minimize steroid-induced side effects. For the first 2 weeks of treatment, they each may be applied once daily or mixed together and applied twice daily. For subsequent maintenance, topical calcipotriene may be applied on weekdays and topical steroids only on weekends. Combination calcipotriol–betamethasone dipropionate also is available as cream, ointment, foam, and suspension vehicles for use on the body and scalp in children aged 12 years and older. Tacrolimus ointment 0.1% may be applied in a thin layer up to twice daily. Concurrent emollient use also is recommended with these therapies.

Health care providers should educate patients and guardians about the potential side effects of topical therapies. They also should provide explicit instructions for amount, site, frequency, and duration of application. Topical corticosteroids commonly result in burning on application and may potentially cause skin thinning and striae with overuse. Topical vitamin D analogues may result in local irritation that may be improved by concurrent emollient use, and they generally should be avoided on sensitive sites. Topical calcineurin inhibitors are associated with burning, stinging, and pruritus, and the US Food and Drug Administration has issued a black-box warning related to risk for lymphoma with their chronic intermittent use. However, it was based on rare reports of lymphoma in transplant patients taking oral calcineurin inhibitors; no clinical trials to date in humans have demonstrated an increased risk for malignancy with topical calcineurin inhibitors.¹⁰ Tazarotene should be used cautiously in females of childbearing age given its teratogenic potential.

Children younger than 7 years are especially prone to suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis from topical corticosteroid therapy and theoretically hypercalcemia and hypervitaminosis D from topical vitamin D analogues, as their high BSA-to-volume ratio increases potential for systemic absorption. Children should avoid occlusive application of topical vitamin D analogues to large areas of the skin. Monitoring of vitamin D metabolites in the serum may be considered if calcipotriene or calcipotriol application to a large BSA is warranted.

Light-Based Therapy

In children with widespread psoriasis or those refractory to topical therapy, phototherapy may be considered. Narrowband UVB (311- to 313-nm wavelength) therapy is considered a first-line form of phototherapy in pediatric psoriasis. Mineral oil or emollient pretreatment to affected areas may augment the efficacy of UV-based treatments.¹¹ Excimer laser and UVA also may be efficacious, though evidence is limited in children. Treatment is recommended to start at 3 days a week, and once improvement is seen, the frequency can be decreased to 2 days a week. Once desired clearance is achieved, maintenance therapy can be continued at even longer intervals. Adjunctive use of tar preparations may potentiate the efficacy of phototherapy, though there is a theoretical increased risk for carcinogenicity with prolonged use of coal tar. Side effects of phototherapy include erythema, blistering hyperpigmentation, and pruritus. Psoralen is contraindicated in children younger than 12 years. All forms of phototherapy are contraindicated in children with generalized erythroderma and cutaneous cancer syndromes. Other important pediatric-specific considerations include anxiety that may be provoked by UV light machines and inconvenience of frequent appointments.

Nonbiologic Systemic Therapies

Systemic therapies may be considered in children with recalcitrant, widespread, or rapidly progressing psoriasis, particularly if the disease is accompanied by severe emotional and psychological burden. These drugs, which include methotrexate, cyclosporine, and acitretin (see eTable for recommended dosing), are advantageous in that they may be combined with other therapies; however, they have potential for dangerous toxicities.

Methotrexate is the most frequently utilized systemic therapy for psoriasis worldwide in children because of its low cost, once-weekly dosing, and the substantial amount of long-term efficacy and safety data available in the pediatric population. It is slow acting initially but has excellent long-term efficacy for nearly every subtype of psoriasis. The most common side effect of methotrexate is gastrointestinal tract intolerance. Nonetheless, adverse events are rare in children without prior history, with 1 large study (N=289) reporting no adverse events in more than 90% of patients aged 9 to 14 years treated with methotrexate.¹² Current guidelines recommend monitoring for bone marrow suppression and elevated transaminase levels 4 to 6 days after initiating treatment.¹ The absolute contraindications for methotrexate are pregnancy and liver disease, and caution should be taken in children with metabolic risk factors. Adolescents must be counseled regarding the elevated risk for hepatotoxicity associated with alcohol ingestion. Methotrexate therapy also requires 1 mg folic acid supplementation 6 to 7 days a week, which decreases the risk for developing folic acid deficiency and may decrease gastrointestinal tract intolerance and hepatic side effects that may result from therapy.

Cyclosporine is an effective and well-tolerated option for rapid control of severe psoriasis in children. It is useful for various types of psoriasis but generally is reserved for more severe subtypes, such as generalized pustular psoriasis, erythrodermic psoriasis, and uncontrolled plaque psoriasis. Long-term use of cyclosporine may result in renal toxicity and hypertension, and this therapy is absolutely contraindicated in children with kidney disease or hypertension at baseline. It is strongly recommended to evaluate blood pressure every week for the first month of therapy and at every subsequent follow-up visit, which may occur at variable intervals based on the judgement of the provider. Evaluation before and during treatment with cyclosporine also should include a complete blood cell count, complete metabolic panel, and lipid panel.

Systemic retinoids have a unique advantage over methotrexate and cyclosporine in that they are not immunosuppressive and therefore are not contraindicated in children who are very young or immunosuppressed. Children receiving systemic retinoids also can receive routine live vaccines—measles-mumps-rubella, varicella zoster, and rotavirus—that are contraindicated with other systemic therapies. Acitretin is particularly effective in pediatric patients with diffuse guttate psoriasis, pustular psoriasis, and palmoplantar psoriasis. Narrowband UVB therapy has been shown to augment the effectiveness of acitretin in children, which may allow for reduced acitretin dosing. Pustular psoriasis may respond as quickly as 3 weeks after initiation, whereas it may take 2 to 3 months before improvement is noticed in plaque psoriasis. Side effects of retinoids include skin dryness, hyperlipidemia, and gastrointestinal tract upset. The most severe long-term concern is skeletal toxicity, including premature epiphyseal closure, hyperostosis, periosteal bone formation, and decreased bone mineral density.¹ Vitamin A derivatives also are known teratogens and should be avoided in females of childbearing potential. Lipids and transaminases should be monitored routinely, and screening for depression and psychiatric symptoms should be performed frequently.¹

When utilizing systemic therapies, the objective should be to control the disease, maintain stability, and ultimately taper to the lowest effective dose or transition to a topical therapy, if feasible. Although no particular systemic therapy is recommended as first line for children with psoriasis, it is important to consider comorbidities, contraindications, monitoring frequency, mode of administration (injectable therapies elicit more psychological trauma in children than oral therapies), and expense when determining the best choice.

Biologics

Biologic agents are associated with very high to total psoriatic plaque clearance rates and require infrequent dosing and monitoring. However, their use may be limited by cost and injection phobias in children as well as limited evidence for their efficacy and safety in pediatric psoriasis. Several studies have established the safety and effectiveness of biologics in children with plaque psoriasis (see eTable for recommended dosing), whereas the evidence supporting their use in treating pustular and erythrodermic variants are limited to case reports and case series. The tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitor etanercept has been approved for use in children aged 4 years and older, and the IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor ustekinumab is approved in children aged 6 years and older. Other TNF-α inhibitors, namely infliximab and adalimumab, commonly are utilized off label for pediatric psoriasis. The most common side effect of biologic therapies in pediatric patients is injection-site reactions.¹ Prior to initiating therapy, children must undergo tuberculosis screening either by purified protein derivative testing or IFN-γ release assay. Testing should be repeated annually in individuals taking TNF-α inhibitors, though the utility of repeat testing when taking biologics in other classes is not clear. High-risk patients also should be screened for human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis. Follow-up frequency may range from every 3 months to annually, based on judgement of the provider. In children who develop loss of response to biologics, methotrexate can be added to the regimen to attenuate formation of efficacy-reducing antidrug antibodies.

Final Thoughts

When managing children with psoriasis, it is important for dermatologists to appropriately educate guardians and children on the disease course, as well as consider the psychological, emotional, social, and financial factors that may direct decision-making regarding optimal therapeutics. Dermatologists should consider collaboration with the child’s primary care physician and other specialists to ensure that all needs are met.

These guidelines provide a framework agreed upon by numerous experts in pediatric psoriasis, but they are limited by gaps in the research. There still is much to be learned regarding the pathophysiology of psoriasis; the risk for developing comorbidities during adulthood; and the efficacy and safety of certain therapeutics, particularly biologics, in pediatric patients with psoriasis.

In November 2019, the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) and the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) released their first set of recommendations for the management of pediatric psoriasis.¹ The pediatric guidelines discuss methods of quantifying disease severity in children, triggers and comorbidities, and the efficacy and safety of various therapeutic agents. This review aims to discuss, in a condensed form, special considerations unique to the management of children with psoriasis as presented in the guidelines as well as grade A– and grade B–level treatment recommendations (Table).

Quantifying Psoriasis Severity in Children

Percentage body surface area (BSA) involvement is the most common mode of grading psoriasis severity, with less than 3% BSA involvement being considered mild, 3% to 10% BSA moderate, and more than 10% severe disease. In children, the standard method of measuring BSA is the rule of 9’s: the head and each arm make up 9% of the total BSA, each leg and the front and back of the torso respectively each make up 18%, and the genitalia make up 1%. It also is important to consider impact on quality of life, which may be remarkable in spite of limited BSA involvement. The children’s dermatology life quality index score may be utilized in combination with affected BSA to determine the burden of psoriasis in context of impact on daily life. This metric is available in both written and cartoon form, and it consists of 10 questions that include variables such as severity of itch, impact on social life, and effects on sleep. Most notably, this tool incorporates pruritus,² which generally is addressed inadequately in pediatric psoriasis.

Triggers and Comorbidities in Pediatric Patients

In children, it is important to identify and eliminate modifiable factors that may prompt psoriasis flares. Infections, particularly group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal infections, are a major trigger in neonates and infants. Other exacerbating factors in children include emotional stress, secondhand cigarette smoke, Kawasaki disease, and withdrawal from systemic corticosteroids.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a burdensome comorbidity affecting children with psoriasis. The prevalence of joint disease is 15-times greater in children with psoriasis vs those without,³ and 80% of children with PsA develop rheumatologic symptoms, which typically include oligoarticular disease and dactylitis in infants and girls and enthesitis and axial joint involvement in boys and older children, years prior to the onset of cutaneous disease.⁴ Uveitis often occurs in children with psoriasis and PsA but not in those with isolated cutaneous disease.

Compared to unaffected children, pediatric patients with psoriasis have greater prevalence of metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors during childhood, including central obesity, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, insulin resistance, atherosclerosis, arrythmia, and valvular heart disease. Family history of obesity increases the risk for early-onset development of cutaneous lesions,^5,6 and weight reduction may alleviate severity of psoriasis lesions.⁷ In the United States, many of the metabolic associations observed are particularly robust in Black and Hispanic children vs those of other races. Furthermore, the prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease is 3- to 4-times higher in children with psoriasis compared to those without.

As with other cutaneous diseases, it is important to be aware of social and mental health concerns in children with psoriasis. The majority of pediatric patients with psoriasis experience name-calling, shaming, or bullying, and many have concerns from skin shedding and malodor. Independent risk for depression after the onset of psoriasis is high. Affected older children and adolescents are at increased risk for alcohol and drug abuse as well as eating disorders.

Despite these identified comorbidities, there are no unique screening recommendations for arthritis, ophthalmologic disease, metabolic disease, cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal tract disease, or mental health issues in children with psoriasis. Rather, these patients should be monitored according to the American Academy of Pediatrics or American Diabetes Association guidelines for all pediatric patients.^8,9 Nonetheless, educating patients and guardians about these potential issues may be warranted.

Topical Therapies

For children with mild to moderate psoriasis, topical therapies are first line. Despite being off label, topical corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy for localized psoriatic plaques in children. Topical vitamin D analogues—calcitriol and calcipotriol/calcipotriene—are highly effective and well tolerated, and they frequently are used in combination with topical corticosteroids. Topical calcineurin inhibitors, namely tacrolimus, also are used off label but are considered first line for sensitive regions of the skin in children, including the face, genitalia, and body folds. There currently is limited evidence for supporting the use of the topical vitamin A analogue tazarotene in children with psoriasis, though some consider its off-label use effective for pediatric nail psoriasis. It also may be used as an adjunct to topical corticosteroids to minimize irritation.

Although there is no gold standard topical regimen, combination therapy with a high-potency topical steroid and topical vitamin D analogue commonly is used to minimize steroid-induced side effects. For the first 2 weeks of treatment, they each may be applied once daily or mixed together and applied twice daily. For subsequent maintenance, topical calcipotriene may be applied on weekdays and topical steroids only on weekends. Combination calcipotriol–betamethasone dipropionate also is available as cream, ointment, foam, and suspension vehicles for use on the body and scalp in children aged 12 years and older. Tacrolimus ointment 0.1% may be applied in a thin layer up to twice daily. Concurrent emollient use also is recommended with these therapies.

Health care providers should educate patients and guardians about the potential side effects of topical therapies. They also should provide explicit instructions for amount, site, frequency, and duration of application. Topical corticosteroids commonly result in burning on application and may potentially cause skin thinning and striae with overuse. Topical vitamin D analogues may result in local irritation that may be improved by concurrent emollient use, and they generally should be avoided on sensitive sites. Topical calcineurin inhibitors are associated with burning, stinging, and pruritus, and the US Food and Drug Administration has issued a black-box warning related to risk for lymphoma with their chronic intermittent use. However, it was based on rare reports of lymphoma in transplant patients taking oral calcineurin inhibitors; no clinical trials to date in humans have demonstrated an increased risk for malignancy with topical calcineurin inhibitors.¹⁰ Tazarotene should be used cautiously in females of childbearing age given its teratogenic potential.

Children younger than 7 years are especially prone to suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis from topical corticosteroid therapy and theoretically hypercalcemia and hypervitaminosis D from topical vitamin D analogues, as their high BSA-to-volume ratio increases potential for systemic absorption. Children should avoid occlusive application of topical vitamin D analogues to large areas of the skin. Monitoring of vitamin D metabolites in the serum may be considered if calcipotriene or calcipotriol application to a large BSA is warranted.

Light-Based Therapy

In children with widespread psoriasis or those refractory to topical therapy, phototherapy may be considered. Narrowband UVB (311- to 313-nm wavelength) therapy is considered a first-line form of phototherapy in pediatric psoriasis. Mineral oil or emollient pretreatment to affected areas may augment the efficacy of UV-based treatments.¹¹ Excimer laser and UVA also may be efficacious, though evidence is limited in children. Treatment is recommended to start at 3 days a week, and once improvement is seen, the frequency can be decreased to 2 days a week. Once desired clearance is achieved, maintenance therapy can be continued at even longer intervals. Adjunctive use of tar preparations may potentiate the efficacy of phototherapy, though there is a theoretical increased risk for carcinogenicity with prolonged use of coal tar. Side effects of phototherapy include erythema, blistering hyperpigmentation, and pruritus. Psoralen is contraindicated in children younger than 12 years. All forms of phototherapy are contraindicated in children with generalized erythroderma and cutaneous cancer syndromes. Other important pediatric-specific considerations include anxiety that may be provoked by UV light machines and inconvenience of frequent appointments.

Nonbiologic Systemic Therapies

Systemic therapies may be considered in children with recalcitrant, widespread, or rapidly progressing psoriasis, particularly if the disease is accompanied by severe emotional and psychological burden. These drugs, which include methotrexate, cyclosporine, and acitretin (see eTable for recommended dosing), are advantageous in that they may be combined with other therapies; however, they have potential for dangerous toxicities.

Methotrexate is the most frequently utilized systemic therapy for psoriasis worldwide in children because of its low cost, once-weekly dosing, and the substantial amount of long-term efficacy and safety data available in the pediatric population. It is slow acting initially but has excellent long-term efficacy for nearly every subtype of psoriasis. The most common side effect of methotrexate is gastrointestinal tract intolerance. Nonetheless, adverse events are rare in children without prior history, with 1 large study (N=289) reporting no adverse events in more than 90% of patients aged 9 to 14 years treated with methotrexate.¹² Current guidelines recommend monitoring for bone marrow suppression and elevated transaminase levels 4 to 6 days after initiating treatment.¹ The absolute contraindications for methotrexate are pregnancy and liver disease, and caution should be taken in children with metabolic risk factors. Adolescents must be counseled regarding the elevated risk for hepatotoxicity associated with alcohol ingestion. Methotrexate therapy also requires 1 mg folic acid supplementation 6 to 7 days a week, which decreases the risk for developing folic acid deficiency and may decrease gastrointestinal tract intolerance and hepatic side effects that may result from therapy.

Cyclosporine is an effective and well-tolerated option for rapid control of severe psoriasis in children. It is useful for various types of psoriasis but generally is reserved for more severe subtypes, such as generalized pustular psoriasis, erythrodermic psoriasis, and uncontrolled plaque psoriasis. Long-term use of cyclosporine may result in renal toxicity and hypertension, and this therapy is absolutely contraindicated in children with kidney disease or hypertension at baseline. It is strongly recommended to evaluate blood pressure every week for the first month of therapy and at every subsequent follow-up visit, which may occur at variable intervals based on the judgement of the provider. Evaluation before and during treatment with cyclosporine also should include a complete blood cell count, complete metabolic panel, and lipid panel.

Systemic retinoids have a unique advantage over methotrexate and cyclosporine in that they are not immunosuppressive and therefore are not contraindicated in children who are very young or immunosuppressed. Children receiving systemic retinoids also can receive routine live vaccines—measles-mumps-rubella, varicella zoster, and rotavirus—that are contraindicated with other systemic therapies. Acitretin is particularly effective in pediatric patients with diffuse guttate psoriasis, pustular psoriasis, and palmoplantar psoriasis. Narrowband UVB therapy has been shown to augment the effectiveness of acitretin in children, which may allow for reduced acitretin dosing. Pustular psoriasis may respond as quickly as 3 weeks after initiation, whereas it may take 2 to 3 months before improvement is noticed in plaque psoriasis. Side effects of retinoids include skin dryness, hyperlipidemia, and gastrointestinal tract upset. The most severe long-term concern is skeletal toxicity, including premature epiphyseal closure, hyperostosis, periosteal bone formation, and decreased bone mineral density.¹ Vitamin A derivatives also are known teratogens and should be avoided in females of childbearing potential. Lipids and transaminases should be monitored routinely, and screening for depression and psychiatric symptoms should be performed frequently.¹

When utilizing systemic therapies, the objective should be to control the disease, maintain stability, and ultimately taper to the lowest effective dose or transition to a topical therapy, if feasible. Although no particular systemic therapy is recommended as first line for children with psoriasis, it is important to consider comorbidities, contraindications, monitoring frequency, mode of administration (injectable therapies elicit more psychological trauma in children than oral therapies), and expense when determining the best choice.

Biologics

Biologic agents are associated with very high to total psoriatic plaque clearance rates and require infrequent dosing and monitoring. However, their use may be limited by cost and injection phobias in children as well as limited evidence for their efficacy and safety in pediatric psoriasis. Several studies have established the safety and effectiveness of biologics in children with plaque psoriasis (see eTable for recommended dosing), whereas the evidence supporting their use in treating pustular and erythrodermic variants are limited to case reports and case series. The tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitor etanercept has been approved for use in children aged 4 years and older, and the IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor ustekinumab is approved in children aged 6 years and older. Other TNF-α inhibitors, namely infliximab and adalimumab, commonly are utilized off label for pediatric psoriasis. The most common side effect of biologic therapies in pediatric patients is injection-site reactions.¹ Prior to initiating therapy, children must undergo tuberculosis screening either by purified protein derivative testing or IFN-γ release assay. Testing should be repeated annually in individuals taking TNF-α inhibitors, though the utility of repeat testing when taking biologics in other classes is not clear. High-risk patients also should be screened for human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis. Follow-up frequency may range from every 3 months to annually, based on judgement of the provider. In children who develop loss of response to biologics, methotrexate can be added to the regimen to attenuate formation of efficacy-reducing antidrug antibodies.

Final Thoughts

When managing children with psoriasis, it is important for dermatologists to appropriately educate guardians and children on the disease course, as well as consider the psychological, emotional, social, and financial factors that may direct decision-making regarding optimal therapeutics. Dermatologists should consider collaboration with the child’s primary care physician and other specialists to ensure that all needs are met.

These guidelines provide a framework agreed upon by numerous experts in pediatric psoriasis, but they are limited by gaps in the research. There still is much to be learned regarding the pathophysiology of psoriasis; the risk for developing comorbidities during adulthood; and the efficacy and safety of certain therapeutics, particularly biologics, in pediatric patients with psoriasis.

In November 2019, the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) and the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) released their first set of recommendations for the management of pediatric psoriasis.¹ The pediatric guidelines discuss methods of quantifying disease severity in children, triggers and comorbidities, and the efficacy and safety of various therapeutic agents. This review aims to discuss, in a condensed form, special considerations unique to the management of children with psoriasis as presented in the guidelines as well as grade A– and grade B–level treatment recommendations (Table).

Quantifying Psoriasis Severity in Children

Percentage body surface area (BSA) involvement is the most common mode of grading psoriasis severity, with less than 3% BSA involvement being considered mild, 3% to 10% BSA moderate, and more than 10% severe disease. In children, the standard method of measuring BSA is the rule of 9’s: the head and each arm make up 9% of the total BSA, each leg and the front and back of the torso respectively each make up 18%, and the genitalia make up 1%. It also is important to consider impact on quality of life, which may be remarkable in spite of limited BSA involvement. The children’s dermatology life quality index score may be utilized in combination with affected BSA to determine the burden of psoriasis in context of impact on daily life. This metric is available in both written and cartoon form, and it consists of 10 questions that include variables such as severity of itch, impact on social life, and effects on sleep. Most notably, this tool incorporates pruritus,² which generally is addressed inadequately in pediatric psoriasis.

Triggers and Comorbidities in Pediatric Patients

In children, it is important to identify and eliminate modifiable factors that may prompt psoriasis flares. Infections, particularly group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal infections, are a major trigger in neonates and infants. Other exacerbating factors in children include emotional stress, secondhand cigarette smoke, Kawasaki disease, and withdrawal from systemic corticosteroids.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a burdensome comorbidity affecting children with psoriasis. The prevalence of joint disease is 15-times greater in children with psoriasis vs those without,³ and 80% of children with PsA develop rheumatologic symptoms, which typically include oligoarticular disease and dactylitis in infants and girls and enthesitis and axial joint involvement in boys and older children, years prior to the onset of cutaneous disease.⁴ Uveitis often occurs in children with psoriasis and PsA but not in those with isolated cutaneous disease.

Compared to unaffected children, pediatric patients with psoriasis have greater prevalence of metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors during childhood, including central obesity, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, insulin resistance, atherosclerosis, arrythmia, and valvular heart disease. Family history of obesity increases the risk for early-onset development of cutaneous lesions,^5,6 and weight reduction may alleviate severity of psoriasis lesions.⁷ In the United States, many of the metabolic associations observed are particularly robust in Black and Hispanic children vs those of other races. Furthermore, the prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease is 3- to 4-times higher in children with psoriasis compared to those without.

As with other cutaneous diseases, it is important to be aware of social and mental health concerns in children with psoriasis. The majority of pediatric patients with psoriasis experience name-calling, shaming, or bullying, and many have concerns from skin shedding and malodor. Independent risk for depression after the onset of psoriasis is high. Affected older children and adolescents are at increased risk for alcohol and drug abuse as well as eating disorders.

Despite these identified comorbidities, there are no unique screening recommendations for arthritis, ophthalmologic disease, metabolic disease, cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal tract disease, or mental health issues in children with psoriasis. Rather, these patients should be monitored according to the American Academy of Pediatrics or American Diabetes Association guidelines for all pediatric patients.^8,9 Nonetheless, educating patients and guardians about these potential issues may be warranted.

Topical Therapies

For children with mild to moderate psoriasis, topical therapies are first line. Despite being off label, topical corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy for localized psoriatic plaques in children. Topical vitamin D analogues—calcitriol and calcipotriol/calcipotriene—are highly effective and well tolerated, and they frequently are used in combination with topical corticosteroids. Topical calcineurin inhibitors, namely tacrolimus, also are used off label but are considered first line for sensitive regions of the skin in children, including the face, genitalia, and body folds. There currently is limited evidence for supporting the use of the topical vitamin A analogue tazarotene in children with psoriasis, though some consider its off-label use effective for pediatric nail psoriasis. It also may be used as an adjunct to topical corticosteroids to minimize irritation.

Although there is no gold standard topical regimen, combination therapy with a high-potency topical steroid and topical vitamin D analogue commonly is used to minimize steroid-induced side effects. For the first 2 weeks of treatment, they each may be applied once daily or mixed together and applied twice daily. For subsequent maintenance, topical calcipotriene may be applied on weekdays and topical steroids only on weekends. Combination calcipotriol–betamethasone dipropionate also is available as cream, ointment, foam, and suspension vehicles for use on the body and scalp in children aged 12 years and older. Tacrolimus ointment 0.1% may be applied in a thin layer up to twice daily. Concurrent emollient use also is recommended with these therapies.

Health care providers should educate patients and guardians about the potential side effects of topical therapies. They also should provide explicit instructions for amount, site, frequency, and duration of application. Topical corticosteroids commonly result in burning on application and may potentially cause skin thinning and striae with overuse. Topical vitamin D analogues may result in local irritation that may be improved by concurrent emollient use, and they generally should be avoided on sensitive sites. Topical calcineurin inhibitors are associated with burning, stinging, and pruritus, and the US Food and Drug Administration has issued a black-box warning related to risk for lymphoma with their chronic intermittent use. However, it was based on rare reports of lymphoma in transplant patients taking oral calcineurin inhibitors; no clinical trials to date in humans have demonstrated an increased risk for malignancy with topical calcineurin inhibitors.¹⁰ Tazarotene should be used cautiously in females of childbearing age given its teratogenic potential.

Children younger than 7 years are especially prone to suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis from topical corticosteroid therapy and theoretically hypercalcemia and hypervitaminosis D from topical vitamin D analogues, as their high BSA-to-volume ratio increases potential for systemic absorption. Children should avoid occlusive application of topical vitamin D analogues to large areas of the skin. Monitoring of vitamin D metabolites in the serum may be considered if calcipotriene or calcipotriol application to a large BSA is warranted.

Light-Based Therapy

In children with widespread psoriasis or those refractory to topical therapy, phototherapy may be considered. Narrowband UVB (311- to 313-nm wavelength) therapy is considered a first-line form of phototherapy in pediatric psoriasis. Mineral oil or emollient pretreatment to affected areas may augment the efficacy of UV-based treatments.¹¹ Excimer laser and UVA also may be efficacious, though evidence is limited in children. Treatment is recommended to start at 3 days a week, and once improvement is seen, the frequency can be decreased to 2 days a week. Once desired clearance is achieved, maintenance therapy can be continued at even longer intervals. Adjunctive use of tar preparations may potentiate the efficacy of phototherapy, though there is a theoretical increased risk for carcinogenicity with prolonged use of coal tar. Side effects of phototherapy include erythema, blistering hyperpigmentation, and pruritus. Psoralen is contraindicated in children younger than 12 years. All forms of phototherapy are contraindicated in children with generalized erythroderma and cutaneous cancer syndromes. Other important pediatric-specific considerations include anxiety that may be provoked by UV light machines and inconvenience of frequent appointments.

Nonbiologic Systemic Therapies

Systemic therapies may be considered in children with recalcitrant, widespread, or rapidly progressing psoriasis, particularly if the disease is accompanied by severe emotional and psychological burden. These drugs, which include methotrexate, cyclosporine, and acitretin (see eTable for recommended dosing), are advantageous in that they may be combined with other therapies; however, they have potential for dangerous toxicities.

Methotrexate is the most frequently utilized systemic therapy for psoriasis worldwide in children because of its low cost, once-weekly dosing, and the substantial amount of long-term efficacy and safety data available in the pediatric population. It is slow acting initially but has excellent long-term efficacy for nearly every subtype of psoriasis. The most common side effect of methotrexate is gastrointestinal tract intolerance. Nonetheless, adverse events are rare in children without prior history, with 1 large study (N=289) reporting no adverse events in more than 90% of patients aged 9 to 14 years treated with methotrexate.¹² Current guidelines recommend monitoring for bone marrow suppression and elevated transaminase levels 4 to 6 days after initiating treatment.¹ The absolute contraindications for methotrexate are pregnancy and liver disease, and caution should be taken in children with metabolic risk factors. Adolescents must be counseled regarding the elevated risk for hepatotoxicity associated with alcohol ingestion. Methotrexate therapy also requires 1 mg folic acid supplementation 6 to 7 days a week, which decreases the risk for developing folic acid deficiency and may decrease gastrointestinal tract intolerance and hepatic side effects that may result from therapy.

Cyclosporine is an effective and well-tolerated option for rapid control of severe psoriasis in children. It is useful for various types of psoriasis but generally is reserved for more severe subtypes, such as generalized pustular psoriasis, erythrodermic psoriasis, and uncontrolled plaque psoriasis. Long-term use of cyclosporine may result in renal toxicity and hypertension, and this therapy is absolutely contraindicated in children with kidney disease or hypertension at baseline. It is strongly recommended to evaluate blood pressure every week for the first month of therapy and at every subsequent follow-up visit, which may occur at variable intervals based on the judgement of the provider. Evaluation before and during treatment with cyclosporine also should include a complete blood cell count, complete metabolic panel, and lipid panel.

Systemic retinoids have a unique advantage over methotrexate and cyclosporine in that they are not immunosuppressive and therefore are not contraindicated in children who are very young or immunosuppressed. Children receiving systemic retinoids also can receive routine live vaccines—measles-mumps-rubella, varicella zoster, and rotavirus—that are contraindicated with other systemic therapies. Acitretin is particularly effective in pediatric patients with diffuse guttate psoriasis, pustular psoriasis, and palmoplantar psoriasis. Narrowband UVB therapy has been shown to augment the effectiveness of acitretin in children, which may allow for reduced acitretin dosing. Pustular psoriasis may respond as quickly as 3 weeks after initiation, whereas it may take 2 to 3 months before improvement is noticed in plaque psoriasis. Side effects of retinoids include skin dryness, hyperlipidemia, and gastrointestinal tract upset. The most severe long-term concern is skeletal toxicity, including premature epiphyseal closure, hyperostosis, periosteal bone formation, and decreased bone mineral density.¹ Vitamin A derivatives also are known teratogens and should be avoided in females of childbearing potential. Lipids and transaminases should be monitored routinely, and screening for depression and psychiatric symptoms should be performed frequently.¹

When utilizing systemic therapies, the objective should be to control the disease, maintain stability, and ultimately taper to the lowest effective dose or transition to a topical therapy, if feasible. Although no particular systemic therapy is recommended as first line for children with psoriasis, it is important to consider comorbidities, contraindications, monitoring frequency, mode of administration (injectable therapies elicit more psychological trauma in children than oral therapies), and expense when determining the best choice.

Biologics

Biologic agents are associated with very high to total psoriatic plaque clearance rates and require infrequent dosing and monitoring. However, their use may be limited by cost and injection phobias in children as well as limited evidence for their efficacy and safety in pediatric psoriasis. Several studies have established the safety and effectiveness of biologics in children with plaque psoriasis (see eTable for recommended dosing), whereas the evidence supporting their use in treating pustular and erythrodermic variants are limited to case reports and case series. The tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitor etanercept has been approved for use in children aged 4 years and older, and the IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor ustekinumab is approved in children aged 6 years and older. Other TNF-α inhibitors, namely infliximab and adalimumab, commonly are utilized off label for pediatric psoriasis. The most common side effect of biologic therapies in pediatric patients is injection-site reactions.¹ Prior to initiating therapy, children must undergo tuberculosis screening either by purified protein derivative testing or IFN-γ release assay. Testing should be repeated annually in individuals taking TNF-α inhibitors, though the utility of repeat testing when taking biologics in other classes is not clear. High-risk patients also should be screened for human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis. Follow-up frequency may range from every 3 months to annually, based on judgement of the provider. In children who develop loss of response to biologics, methotrexate can be added to the regimen to attenuate formation of efficacy-reducing antidrug antibodies.

Final Thoughts

When managing children with psoriasis, it is important for dermatologists to appropriately educate guardians and children on the disease course, as well as consider the psychological, emotional, social, and financial factors that may direct decision-making regarding optimal therapeutics. Dermatologists should consider collaboration with the child’s primary care physician and other specialists to ensure that all needs are met.

These guidelines provide a framework agreed upon by numerous experts in pediatric psoriasis, but they are limited by gaps in the research. There still is much to be learned regarding the pathophysiology of psoriasis; the risk for developing comorbidities during adulthood; and the efficacy and safety of certain therapeutics, particularly biologics, in pediatric patients with psoriasis.

Mercury poisoning affects multiple body systems, leading to variable clinical presentations. Mercury intoxication at low levels frequently presents with weakness, fatigue, weight loss, and abdominal pain. At higher levels of mercury intoxication, tremors and neurologic dysfunction are more prevalent.¹ Dermatologic manifestations of mercury exposure vary and include pink disease (acrodynia), mercury exanthem, contact dermatitis, and cutaneous granulomas. Untreated mercury poisoning may result in severe complications, including renal tubular necrosis, pneumonitis, persistent neurologic dysfunction, and fatality in some cases.^1,2

Pink disease is a rare disease that typically arises in infants and young children from chronic mercury exposure.³ We report a unique presentation of pink disease occurring in an 18-year-old woman following mercury exposure.

Case Report

An 18-year-old woman who was previously healthy presented to the hospital for evaluation of body aches and back pain. She reported a transient rash on the torso 2 weeks prior, but at the current presentation, only the distal upper and lower extremities were involved. A review of systems revealed myalgia, most severe in the lower back; muscle spasms; stiffness in the fingers; abdominal pain; constipation; paresthesia in the hands and feet; hyperhidrosis; and generalized weakness.

Vitals on admission revealed tachycardia (112 beats per minute). Physical examination revealed the patient was pale and fatigued; she appeared to be in pain, with observable facial grimacing and muscle spasms in the legs. She had poorly demarcated pink macules and papules scattered on the left palm (Figure 1), right forearm, right wrist, and dorsal aspects of the feet including the soles. A few pinpoint pustules were present on the left fifth digit.

A diagnosis of mercury poisoning was made along with a component of postinfectious reactive arthropathy due to Campylobacter. The myokymia and skin eruption were believed to be secondary to mercury poisoning. The patient was started on ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice daily), intravenous immunoglobulin for Campylobacter, a 2-week treatment regimen with the chelating agent succimer (500 mg twice daily) for mercury poisoning, and a 3-day regimen of pulse intravenous steroids (intravenous methylprednisolone 500 mg once daily) to reduce inflammation. Repeat mercury levels showed a downward trend, and the rash improved with time. All family members were advised to undergo testing for mercury exposure.

Comment

Manifestations of Mercury Poisoning
Dermatologic manifestations of mercury exposure are varied. The most common—allergic contact dermatitis—presents after repeat systemic or topical exposure.⁴ Mercury exanthem is an acute systemic contact dermatitis most commonly triggered by mercury vapor inhalation. It manifests as an erythematous maculopapular eruption predominantly involving the flexural areas and the anterior thighs in a V-shaped distribution.⁵ Purpura may be seen in severe cases. Cutaneous granulomas after direct injection of mercury also have been reported as well as cutaneous hyperpigmentation after chronic mercury absorption.⁶

Presentation of Pink Disease
Pink disease occurs in children after chronic mercury exposure. It was a common pediatric disorder in the 19th century due to the presence of mercury in certain anthelmintics and teething powders.⁷ However, prevalence drastically decreased after the removal of mercury from these products.³ Although pink disease classically was associated with mercury ingestion, cases also occurred secondary to external application of mercury.⁷ Additionally, in 1988 a case was reported in a 14-month-old girl after inhalation of mercury vapor from a spilled bottle of mercury.³

Pink disease begins with pink discoloration of the fingertips, nose, and toes, and later progresses to involvement of the hands and feet. Erythema, edema, and desquamation of the hands and feet are seen, along with irritability and autonomic dysfunction that manifests as profuse perspiration, tachycardia, and hypertension.³

Diagnosis of Pink Disease
The differential diagnosis of palmoplantar rash is broad and includes rickettsial disease; syphilis; scabies; toxic shock syndrome; infective endocarditis; meningococcal infection; hand-foot-and-mouth disease; dermatophytosis; and palmoplantar keratodermas. The involvement of the hands and feet in our patient, along with hyperhidrosis, tachycardia, and paresthesia, led us to believe that her condition was a variation of pink disease. The patient’s age at presentation (18 years) was unique, as it is atypical for pink disease. Although the polyarthropathy was attributed to Campylobacter, it is important to note that high levels of mercury exposure also have been associated with polyarthritis,⁸ polyneuropathy,⁴ and neuromuscular abnormalities on electromyography.⁴ Therefore, it is possible that the presence of these symptoms in our patient was either secondary to or compounded by mercury exposure.

Mercury Poisoning
Diagnosis of mercury poisoning can be made by assessing blood, urine, hair, or nail concentrations. However, as mercury deposits in multiple organs, individual concentrations do not correlate with total-body mercury levels.¹ Currently, no universal diagnostic criteria for mercury toxicity exist, though a provocation test with the chelating agent 2,3-dimercaptopropanesulfonate is considered reliable in assessing total-body mercury burden.¹

Elemental mercury, as found in some thermometers, dental amalgams, and electrical appliances (eg, certain switches, fluorescent light bulbs), can be converted to inorganic mercury in the body.⁹ Elemental mercury is vaporized at room temperature; the predominant route of exposure is by subsequent inhalation and lung absorbtion.¹⁰ Cutaneous absorption of high concentrations of elementary mercury in either liquid or vapor form may occur, though the rate is slow and absorption is poor. In cases of accidental exposure, contaminated clothing should be removed and immediately decontaminated or disposed. Exposed skin should be washed with a mild soap and water and rinsed thoroughly.¹⁰

The treatment of inorganic mercury poisoning is accomplished with the chelating agents succimer, dimercaptopropanesulfonate, dimercaprol, or D-penicillamine.¹ In symptomatic cases with high clinical suspicion, the first dose of chelation treatment should be initiated early without delay for laboratory confirmation, as treatment efficacy decreases with an increased interim between exposure and onset of chelation.¹¹ Combination chelation therapy also may be used in treatment. Plasma exchange or hemodialysis are treatment options for extreme, life-threatening cases.¹

Conclusion

Mercury exposure should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with a rash on the palms and soles, especially in young patients with systemic symptoms. A high level of suspicion and a thorough history can prevent a delay in treatment and an unnecessarily extensive and expensive workup. An emphasis on early diagnosis and treatment is important for optimal outcomes and can prevent the severe and potentially devastating consequences of mercury toxicity.

Mercury poisoning affects multiple body systems, leading to variable clinical presentations. Mercury intoxication at low levels frequently presents with weakness, fatigue, weight loss, and abdominal pain. At higher levels of mercury intoxication, tremors and neurologic dysfunction are more prevalent.¹ Dermatologic manifestations of mercury exposure vary and include pink disease (acrodynia), mercury exanthem, contact dermatitis, and cutaneous granulomas. Untreated mercury poisoning may result in severe complications, including renal tubular necrosis, pneumonitis, persistent neurologic dysfunction, and fatality in some cases.^1,2

Pink disease is a rare disease that typically arises in infants and young children from chronic mercury exposure.³ We report a unique presentation of pink disease occurring in an 18-year-old woman following mercury exposure.

Case Report

An 18-year-old woman who was previously healthy presented to the hospital for evaluation of body aches and back pain. She reported a transient rash on the torso 2 weeks prior, but at the current presentation, only the distal upper and lower extremities were involved. A review of systems revealed myalgia, most severe in the lower back; muscle spasms; stiffness in the fingers; abdominal pain; constipation; paresthesia in the hands and feet; hyperhidrosis; and generalized weakness.

Vitals on admission revealed tachycardia (112 beats per minute). Physical examination revealed the patient was pale and fatigued; she appeared to be in pain, with observable facial grimacing and muscle spasms in the legs. She had poorly demarcated pink macules and papules scattered on the left palm (Figure 1), right forearm, right wrist, and dorsal aspects of the feet including the soles. A few pinpoint pustules were present on the left fifth digit.

A diagnosis of mercury poisoning was made along with a component of postinfectious reactive arthropathy due to Campylobacter. The myokymia and skin eruption were believed to be secondary to mercury poisoning. The patient was started on ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice daily), intravenous immunoglobulin for Campylobacter, a 2-week treatment regimen with the chelating agent succimer (500 mg twice daily) for mercury poisoning, and a 3-day regimen of pulse intravenous steroids (intravenous methylprednisolone 500 mg once daily) to reduce inflammation. Repeat mercury levels showed a downward trend, and the rash improved with time. All family members were advised to undergo testing for mercury exposure.

Comment

Manifestations of Mercury Poisoning
Dermatologic manifestations of mercury exposure are varied. The most common—allergic contact dermatitis—presents after repeat systemic or topical exposure.⁴ Mercury exanthem is an acute systemic contact dermatitis most commonly triggered by mercury vapor inhalation. It manifests as an erythematous maculopapular eruption predominantly involving the flexural areas and the anterior thighs in a V-shaped distribution.⁵ Purpura may be seen in severe cases. Cutaneous granulomas after direct injection of mercury also have been reported as well as cutaneous hyperpigmentation after chronic mercury absorption.⁶

Presentation of Pink Disease
Pink disease occurs in children after chronic mercury exposure. It was a common pediatric disorder in the 19th century due to the presence of mercury in certain anthelmintics and teething powders.⁷ However, prevalence drastically decreased after the removal of mercury from these products.³ Although pink disease classically was associated with mercury ingestion, cases also occurred secondary to external application of mercury.⁷ Additionally, in 1988 a case was reported in a 14-month-old girl after inhalation of mercury vapor from a spilled bottle of mercury.³

Pink disease begins with pink discoloration of the fingertips, nose, and toes, and later progresses to involvement of the hands and feet. Erythema, edema, and desquamation of the hands and feet are seen, along with irritability and autonomic dysfunction that manifests as profuse perspiration, tachycardia, and hypertension.³

Diagnosis of Pink Disease
The differential diagnosis of palmoplantar rash is broad and includes rickettsial disease; syphilis; scabies; toxic shock syndrome; infective endocarditis; meningococcal infection; hand-foot-and-mouth disease; dermatophytosis; and palmoplantar keratodermas. The involvement of the hands and feet in our patient, along with hyperhidrosis, tachycardia, and paresthesia, led us to believe that her condition was a variation of pink disease. The patient’s age at presentation (18 years) was unique, as it is atypical for pink disease. Although the polyarthropathy was attributed to Campylobacter, it is important to note that high levels of mercury exposure also have been associated with polyarthritis,⁸ polyneuropathy,⁴ and neuromuscular abnormalities on electromyography.⁴ Therefore, it is possible that the presence of these symptoms in our patient was either secondary to or compounded by mercury exposure.

Mercury Poisoning
Diagnosis of mercury poisoning can be made by assessing blood, urine, hair, or nail concentrations. However, as mercury deposits in multiple organs, individual concentrations do not correlate with total-body mercury levels.¹ Currently, no universal diagnostic criteria for mercury toxicity exist, though a provocation test with the chelating agent 2,3-dimercaptopropanesulfonate is considered reliable in assessing total-body mercury burden.¹

Elemental mercury, as found in some thermometers, dental amalgams, and electrical appliances (eg, certain switches, fluorescent light bulbs), can be converted to inorganic mercury in the body.⁹ Elemental mercury is vaporized at room temperature; the predominant route of exposure is by subsequent inhalation and lung absorbtion.¹⁰ Cutaneous absorption of high concentrations of elementary mercury in either liquid or vapor form may occur, though the rate is slow and absorption is poor. In cases of accidental exposure, contaminated clothing should be removed and immediately decontaminated or disposed. Exposed skin should be washed with a mild soap and water and rinsed thoroughly.¹⁰

The treatment of inorganic mercury poisoning is accomplished with the chelating agents succimer, dimercaptopropanesulfonate, dimercaprol, or D-penicillamine.¹ In symptomatic cases with high clinical suspicion, the first dose of chelation treatment should be initiated early without delay for laboratory confirmation, as treatment efficacy decreases with an increased interim between exposure and onset of chelation.¹¹ Combination chelation therapy also may be used in treatment. Plasma exchange or hemodialysis are treatment options for extreme, life-threatening cases.¹

Conclusion

Mercury exposure should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with a rash on the palms and soles, especially in young patients with systemic symptoms. A high level of suspicion and a thorough history can prevent a delay in treatment and an unnecessarily extensive and expensive workup. An emphasis on early diagnosis and treatment is important for optimal outcomes and can prevent the severe and potentially devastating consequences of mercury toxicity.

Mercury poisoning affects multiple body systems, leading to variable clinical presentations. Mercury intoxication at low levels frequently presents with weakness, fatigue, weight loss, and abdominal pain. At higher levels of mercury intoxication, tremors and neurologic dysfunction are more prevalent.¹ Dermatologic manifestations of mercury exposure vary and include pink disease (acrodynia), mercury exanthem, contact dermatitis, and cutaneous granulomas. Untreated mercury poisoning may result in severe complications, including renal tubular necrosis, pneumonitis, persistent neurologic dysfunction, and fatality in some cases.^1,2

Pink disease is a rare disease that typically arises in infants and young children from chronic mercury exposure.³ We report a unique presentation of pink disease occurring in an 18-year-old woman following mercury exposure.

Case Report

An 18-year-old woman who was previously healthy presented to the hospital for evaluation of body aches and back pain. She reported a transient rash on the torso 2 weeks prior, but at the current presentation, only the distal upper and lower extremities were involved. A review of systems revealed myalgia, most severe in the lower back; muscle spasms; stiffness in the fingers; abdominal pain; constipation; paresthesia in the hands and feet; hyperhidrosis; and generalized weakness.

Vitals on admission revealed tachycardia (112 beats per minute). Physical examination revealed the patient was pale and fatigued; she appeared to be in pain, with observable facial grimacing and muscle spasms in the legs. She had poorly demarcated pink macules and papules scattered on the left palm (Figure 1), right forearm, right wrist, and dorsal aspects of the feet including the soles. A few pinpoint pustules were present on the left fifth digit.

A diagnosis of mercury poisoning was made along with a component of postinfectious reactive arthropathy due to Campylobacter. The myokymia and skin eruption were believed to be secondary to mercury poisoning. The patient was started on ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice daily), intravenous immunoglobulin for Campylobacter, a 2-week treatment regimen with the chelating agent succimer (500 mg twice daily) for mercury poisoning, and a 3-day regimen of pulse intravenous steroids (intravenous methylprednisolone 500 mg once daily) to reduce inflammation. Repeat mercury levels showed a downward trend, and the rash improved with time. All family members were advised to undergo testing for mercury exposure.

Comment

Manifestations of Mercury Poisoning
Dermatologic manifestations of mercury exposure are varied. The most common—allergic contact dermatitis—presents after repeat systemic or topical exposure.⁴ Mercury exanthem is an acute systemic contact dermatitis most commonly triggered by mercury vapor inhalation. It manifests as an erythematous maculopapular eruption predominantly involving the flexural areas and the anterior thighs in a V-shaped distribution.⁵ Purpura may be seen in severe cases. Cutaneous granulomas after direct injection of mercury also have been reported as well as cutaneous hyperpigmentation after chronic mercury absorption.⁶

Presentation of Pink Disease
Pink disease occurs in children after chronic mercury exposure. It was a common pediatric disorder in the 19th century due to the presence of mercury in certain anthelmintics and teething powders.⁷ However, prevalence drastically decreased after the removal of mercury from these products.³ Although pink disease classically was associated with mercury ingestion, cases also occurred secondary to external application of mercury.⁷ Additionally, in 1988 a case was reported in a 14-month-old girl after inhalation of mercury vapor from a spilled bottle of mercury.³

Pink disease begins with pink discoloration of the fingertips, nose, and toes, and later progresses to involvement of the hands and feet. Erythema, edema, and desquamation of the hands and feet are seen, along with irritability and autonomic dysfunction that manifests as profuse perspiration, tachycardia, and hypertension.³

Diagnosis of Pink Disease
The differential diagnosis of palmoplantar rash is broad and includes rickettsial disease; syphilis; scabies; toxic shock syndrome; infective endocarditis; meningococcal infection; hand-foot-and-mouth disease; dermatophytosis; and palmoplantar keratodermas. The involvement of the hands and feet in our patient, along with hyperhidrosis, tachycardia, and paresthesia, led us to believe that her condition was a variation of pink disease. The patient’s age at presentation (18 years) was unique, as it is atypical for pink disease. Although the polyarthropathy was attributed to Campylobacter, it is important to note that high levels of mercury exposure also have been associated with polyarthritis,⁸ polyneuropathy,⁴ and neuromuscular abnormalities on electromyography.⁴ Therefore, it is possible that the presence of these symptoms in our patient was either secondary to or compounded by mercury exposure.

Mercury Poisoning
Diagnosis of mercury poisoning can be made by assessing blood, urine, hair, or nail concentrations. However, as mercury deposits in multiple organs, individual concentrations do not correlate with total-body mercury levels.¹ Currently, no universal diagnostic criteria for mercury toxicity exist, though a provocation test with the chelating agent 2,3-dimercaptopropanesulfonate is considered reliable in assessing total-body mercury burden.¹

Elemental mercury, as found in some thermometers, dental amalgams, and electrical appliances (eg, certain switches, fluorescent light bulbs), can be converted to inorganic mercury in the body.⁹ Elemental mercury is vaporized at room temperature; the predominant route of exposure is by subsequent inhalation and lung absorbtion.¹⁰ Cutaneous absorption of high concentrations of elementary mercury in either liquid or vapor form may occur, though the rate is slow and absorption is poor. In cases of accidental exposure, contaminated clothing should be removed and immediately decontaminated or disposed. Exposed skin should be washed with a mild soap and water and rinsed thoroughly.¹⁰

The treatment of inorganic mercury poisoning is accomplished with the chelating agents succimer, dimercaptopropanesulfonate, dimercaprol, or D-penicillamine.¹ In symptomatic cases with high clinical suspicion, the first dose of chelation treatment should be initiated early without delay for laboratory confirmation, as treatment efficacy decreases with an increased interim between exposure and onset of chelation.¹¹ Combination chelation therapy also may be used in treatment. Plasma exchange or hemodialysis are treatment options for extreme, life-threatening cases.¹

Conclusion

Mercury exposure should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with a rash on the palms and soles, especially in young patients with systemic symptoms. A high level of suspicion and a thorough history can prevent a delay in treatment and an unnecessarily extensive and expensive workup. An emphasis on early diagnosis and treatment is important for optimal outcomes and can prevent the severe and potentially devastating consequences of mercury toxicity.

New CFTR [cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator] modulator therapies can offer life-altering benefits to some patients with cystic fibrosis, even those with advanced disease.

Triple combination therapy in cystic fibrosis patients with advanced lung disease appears to improve lung function, and may delay the need for lung transplantation, according to a multicenter analysis of patients taking elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor.

The study participants had a percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV₁) of 40% or below, or other high-risk factors. Researchers compared them to control patients who were genetically ineligible for triple combination therapy.

Previous studies of such patients on individual drugs or previous combinations showed increases in lung function in patients with advanced disease, though the magnitude of improvement varied across regimens. “With this improvement, it’s unclear how CFTR modulators should affect lung transplant referral timing,” Brent Bermingham, MD, said during a presentation of the study at the virtual North American Cystic Fibrosis Conference.

“The rationale for our study was that despite patients with advanced lung disease being excluded from phase III trials (of elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor), they are receiving a therapy with an unknown clinical efficacy and safety profile,” said Dr. Bermingham, a pulmonary and critical care fellow at the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

Lung transplant referral guidelines recommend that physicians initiate discussions about the potential benefit of lung transplant when FEV₁ drops below 50% of the predicted value. Patients should be referred for a transplant when the value is below 50% and rapidly declining (>20% decline in the past 12 months), when it drops below 40% with accompanying predictors of shortened survival, or when it drops below 30%. The guidelines were published before approval of triple combination therapy.

The researchers conducted an open-label retrospective analysis of 60 patients started on triple combination therapy between September 2019 and February 2020 at three centers in the Southeast. They compared percent predicted ppFEV₁ values prior to initiation of therapy to ppFEV₁ values obtained 2-12 weeks after the start of therapy. Patients on therapy were compared with 10 genetically ineligible controls. The two groups were generally similar aside from genetic status, though 100% of the therapy group had pancreatic insufficiency, compared with 90% of controls (P = .013).

The therapeutic group experienced a 7.8% increase in ppFEV₁ after starting therapy (P < .001), compared with a 0.5% decrease in controls (P = .65). Before initiation of therapy, 33% of the therapy group met the criteria for initiating a transplant discussion, while 67% had been recommended for transplant. After therapy, 55% met the criteria for discussion, 33% were recommended for transplant, and 12% no longer met the criteria for discussion of transplantation. Fifty percent of controls were in discussion, and this dropped to 40%, while 50% were referred for transplantation, and this increased to 60%. On therapy, transplant referral candidates had an increase of forced vital capacity from 48.9 to 59.16 (P < .001).

Adverse events were rare, with only one discontinuation that occurred following a lung transplant and was not believed to be treatment related.

“Our study had a large number of patients taken from multiple centers, which suggests generalizabilty and real-world experience,” said Dr. Bermingham.

The results are encouraging, said Robert J. Giusti, MD, clinical professor of pediatrics at the New York University and director of the Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Center.

“We’re all remarking how wonderful patients feel these days. It’s really a disease-altering treatment. But for the high-risk group, whose FEV₁ is less than 40%, those are the patients we’re more concerned about because we thought maybe they had too much lung disease, and that they wouldn’t benefit from triple combination. But they seem to be improving, so that’s very reassuring,” said Dr. Giusti, who was not involved in the study.

The study received funding from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and Dartmouth College. Dr. Bermingham and Dr. Giusti have no relevant financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Bermingham B et al. NACFC 2020, Abstract 645.

New CFTR [cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator] modulator therapies can offer life-altering benefits to some patients with cystic fibrosis, even those with advanced disease.

Triple combination therapy in cystic fibrosis patients with advanced lung disease appears to improve lung function, and may delay the need for lung transplantation, according to a multicenter analysis of patients taking elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor.

The study participants had a percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV₁) of 40% or below, or other high-risk factors. Researchers compared them to control patients who were genetically ineligible for triple combination therapy.

Previous studies of such patients on individual drugs or previous combinations showed increases in lung function in patients with advanced disease, though the magnitude of improvement varied across regimens. “With this improvement, it’s unclear how CFTR modulators should affect lung transplant referral timing,” Brent Bermingham, MD, said during a presentation of the study at the virtual North American Cystic Fibrosis Conference.

“The rationale for our study was that despite patients with advanced lung disease being excluded from phase III trials (of elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor), they are receiving a therapy with an unknown clinical efficacy and safety profile,” said Dr. Bermingham, a pulmonary and critical care fellow at the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

Lung transplant referral guidelines recommend that physicians initiate discussions about the potential benefit of lung transplant when FEV₁ drops below 50% of the predicted value. Patients should be referred for a transplant when the value is below 50% and rapidly declining (>20% decline in the past 12 months), when it drops below 40% with accompanying predictors of shortened survival, or when it drops below 30%. The guidelines were published before approval of triple combination therapy.

The researchers conducted an open-label retrospective analysis of 60 patients started on triple combination therapy between September 2019 and February 2020 at three centers in the Southeast. They compared percent predicted ppFEV₁ values prior to initiation of therapy to ppFEV₁ values obtained 2-12 weeks after the start of therapy. Patients on therapy were compared with 10 genetically ineligible controls. The two groups were generally similar aside from genetic status, though 100% of the therapy group had pancreatic insufficiency, compared with 90% of controls (P = .013).

The therapeutic group experienced a 7.8% increase in ppFEV₁ after starting therapy (P < .001), compared with a 0.5% decrease in controls (P = .65). Before initiation of therapy, 33% of the therapy group met the criteria for initiating a transplant discussion, while 67% had been recommended for transplant. After therapy, 55% met the criteria for discussion, 33% were recommended for transplant, and 12% no longer met the criteria for discussion of transplantation. Fifty percent of controls were in discussion, and this dropped to 40%, while 50% were referred for transplantation, and this increased to 60%. On therapy, transplant referral candidates had an increase of forced vital capacity from 48.9 to 59.16 (P < .001).

Adverse events were rare, with only one discontinuation that occurred following a lung transplant and was not believed to be treatment related.

“Our study had a large number of patients taken from multiple centers, which suggests generalizabilty and real-world experience,” said Dr. Bermingham.

The results are encouraging, said Robert J. Giusti, MD, clinical professor of pediatrics at the New York University and director of the Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Center.

“We’re all remarking how wonderful patients feel these days. It’s really a disease-altering treatment. But for the high-risk group, whose FEV₁ is less than 40%, those are the patients we’re more concerned about because we thought maybe they had too much lung disease, and that they wouldn’t benefit from triple combination. But they seem to be improving, so that’s very reassuring,” said Dr. Giusti, who was not involved in the study.

The study received funding from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and Dartmouth College. Dr. Bermingham and Dr. Giusti have no relevant financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Bermingham B et al. NACFC 2020, Abstract 645.

New CFTR [cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator] modulator therapies can offer life-altering benefits to some patients with cystic fibrosis, even those with advanced disease.

Triple combination therapy in cystic fibrosis patients with advanced lung disease appears to improve lung function, and may delay the need for lung transplantation, according to a multicenter analysis of patients taking elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor.

The study participants had a percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV₁) of 40% or below, or other high-risk factors. Researchers compared them to control patients who were genetically ineligible for triple combination therapy.

Previous studies of such patients on individual drugs or previous combinations showed increases in lung function in patients with advanced disease, though the magnitude of improvement varied across regimens. “With this improvement, it’s unclear how CFTR modulators should affect lung transplant referral timing,” Brent Bermingham, MD, said during a presentation of the study at the virtual North American Cystic Fibrosis Conference.

“The rationale for our study was that despite patients with advanced lung disease being excluded from phase III trials (of elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor), they are receiving a therapy with an unknown clinical efficacy and safety profile,” said Dr. Bermingham, a pulmonary and critical care fellow at the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

Lung transplant referral guidelines recommend that physicians initiate discussions about the potential benefit of lung transplant when FEV₁ drops below 50% of the predicted value. Patients should be referred for a transplant when the value is below 50% and rapidly declining (>20% decline in the past 12 months), when it drops below 40% with accompanying predictors of shortened survival, or when it drops below 30%. The guidelines were published before approval of triple combination therapy.

The researchers conducted an open-label retrospective analysis of 60 patients started on triple combination therapy between September 2019 and February 2020 at three centers in the Southeast. They compared percent predicted ppFEV₁ values prior to initiation of therapy to ppFEV₁ values obtained 2-12 weeks after the start of therapy. Patients on therapy were compared with 10 genetically ineligible controls. The two groups were generally similar aside from genetic status, though 100% of the therapy group had pancreatic insufficiency, compared with 90% of controls (P = .013).

The therapeutic group experienced a 7.8% increase in ppFEV₁ after starting therapy (P < .001), compared with a 0.5% decrease in controls (P = .65). Before initiation of therapy, 33% of the therapy group met the criteria for initiating a transplant discussion, while 67% had been recommended for transplant. After therapy, 55% met the criteria for discussion, 33% were recommended for transplant, and 12% no longer met the criteria for discussion of transplantation. Fifty percent of controls were in discussion, and this dropped to 40%, while 50% were referred for transplantation, and this increased to 60%. On therapy, transplant referral candidates had an increase of forced vital capacity from 48.9 to 59.16 (P < .001).

Adverse events were rare, with only one discontinuation that occurred following a lung transplant and was not believed to be treatment related.

“Our study had a large number of patients taken from multiple centers, which suggests generalizabilty and real-world experience,” said Dr. Bermingham.

The results are encouraging, said Robert J. Giusti, MD, clinical professor of pediatrics at the New York University and director of the Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Center.

“We’re all remarking how wonderful patients feel these days. It’s really a disease-altering treatment. But for the high-risk group, whose FEV₁ is less than 40%, those are the patients we’re more concerned about because we thought maybe they had too much lung disease, and that they wouldn’t benefit from triple combination. But they seem to be improving, so that’s very reassuring,” said Dr. Giusti, who was not involved in the study.

The study received funding from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and Dartmouth College. Dr. Bermingham and Dr. Giusti have no relevant financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Bermingham B et al. NACFC 2020, Abstract 645.

Characteristics

The ubiquitous human flea, Pulex irritans, is a hematophagous wingless ectoparasite in the order Siphonaptera (wingless siphon) that survives by consuming the blood of its mammalian and avian hosts. Due to diseases such as the bubonic plague, fleas have claimed more victims than all the wars ever fought; in the 14th century, the Black Death caused more than 200 million deaths. Fleas fossilized in amber have been found to be 200 million years old and closely resemble the modern human flea, demonstrating the resilience of the species.

The adult human flea is a small, reddish brown, laterally compressed, wingless insect that is approximately 2- to 3.5-mm long (females, 2.5–3.5 mm; males, 2–2.5 mm) and enclosed by a tough cuticle. Compared to the dog flea (Ctenocephalides canis) and cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis), P irritans has no combs or ctenidia (Figure 1). Fleas have large powerful hind legs enabling them to jump horizontally or vertically 200 times their body length (equivalent to a 6-foot human jumping 1200 feet) using stored muscle energy in a pad on the hind legs composed of the elastic protein resilin.¹ They feed off a wide variety of hosts, including humans, pigs, cats, dogs, goats, sheep, cattle, chickens, owls, foxes, rabbits, mice, and feral cats. The flea’s mouthparts are highly specialized for piercing the skin and sucking its blood meal via direct capillary cannulation.

Life Cycle

There are 4 stages of the flea life cycle: egg, larva, pupa, and adult. Most adult flea species mate on the host; the female will lay an average of 4 to 8 small white eggs on the host after each blood meal, laying more than 400 eggs during her lifetime. The eggs then drop from the host and hatch in approximately 4 to 6 days to become larvae. The active larvae feed on available organic matter in their environment, such as their parents’ feces and detritus, while undergoing 3 molts within 1 week to several months.² The larva then spins a silken cocoon from modified salivary glands to form the pupa. In favorable conditions, the pupa lasts only a few weeks; however, it can last for a year or more in unfavorable conditions. Triggers for emergence of the adult flea from the pupa include high humidity, warm temperatures, increased levels of carbon dioxide, and vibrations including sound. An adult P irritans flea can live for a few weeks to more than 1.5 years in favorable conditions of lower air temperature, high relative humidity, and access to a host.³

Related Diseases

Pulex irritans can be a vector for several human diseases. Yersinia pestis is a gram-negative bacteria that causes plague, a highly virulent disease that killed millions of people during its 3 largest human pandemics. The black rat (Rattus rattus) and the oriental rat flea (Xenopsylla cheopis) have been implicated as initial vectors; however, transmission may be human-to-human with pneumonic plague, and septicemic plague may be spread via Pulex fleas or body lice.^4,5 In 1971, Y pestis was isolated from P irritans on a dog in the home of a plague patient in Kayenta, Arizona.⁶Yersinia pestis bacterial DNA also was extracted from P irritans during a plague outbreak in Madagascar in 2014⁷ and was implicated in epidemiologic studies of plague in Tanzania from 1986 to 2004, suggesting it also plays a role in endemic disease.⁸

Bartonellosis is an emerging disease caused by different species of the gram-negative intracellular bacteria of the genus Bartonella transmitted by lice, ticks, and fleas. Bartonella quintana causes trench fever primarily transmitted by the human body louse, Pediculus humanus corporis, and resulted in more than 1 million cases during World War I. Trench fever is characterized by headache, fever, dizziness, and shin pain that lasts 1 to 3 days and recurs in cycles every 4 to 6 days. Other clinical manifestations of B quintana include chronic bacteremia, endocarditis, lymphadenopathy, and bacillary angiomatosis.⁹Bartonella henselae causes cat scratch fever, characterized by lymphadenopathy, fever, headache, joint pain, and lethargy from infected cat scratches or the bite of an infected flea. Bartonella rochalimae also has been found to cause a trench fever–like bacteremia.¹⁰Bartonella species have been found in P irritans, and the flea is implicated as a vector of bartonellosis in humans.^11-15

Rickettsioses are worldwide diseases caused by the gram-negative intracellular bacteria of the genus Rickettsia transmitted to humans via hematophagous arthropods. The rickettsiae traditionally have been classified into the spotted fever or typhus groups. The spotted fever group (ie, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, Mediterranean spotted fever) is transmitted via ticks. The typhus group is transmitted via lice (epidemic typhus) and fleas (endemic or murine typhus). Murine typhus can be caused by Rickettsia typhi in warm coastal areas around the world where the main mammal reservoir is the rat and the rat flea vector X cheopis. Clinical signs of infection are abrupt onset of fever, headaches, myalgia, malaise, and chills, with a truncal maculopapular rash progressing peripherally several days after the initial clinical signs. Rash is present in up to 50% of cases.¹⁶Rickettsia felis is an emerging flea-borne pathogen causing an acute febrile illness usually transmitted via the cat flea C felis.¹⁷Rickettsia species DNA have been found to be present in P irritans from dogs¹⁸ and livestock¹⁹ and pose a risk for causing rickettsioses in humans.

Environmental Treatment and Prevention

Flea bites present as intense, pruritic, urticarial to vesicular papules that usually are located on the lower extremities but also can be present on exposed areas of the upper extremities and hands (Figure 2). Human fleas infest clothing, and bites can be widespread. Topical antipruritics and corticosteroids can be used for controlling itch and the intense cutaneous inflammatory response. The flea host should be identified in areas of the home, school, farm, work, or local environment. House pets should be examined and treated by a veterinarian. The pet’s bedding should be washed and dried at high temperatures, and carpets and floors should be routinely vacuumed or cleaned to remove eggs, larvae, flea feces, and/or pupae. The killing of adult fleas with insecticidal products (eg, imidacloprid, fipronil, spinosad, selamectin, lufenuron, ivermectin) is the primary method of flea control. Use of insect growth regulators such as pyriproxyfen inhibits adult reproduction and blocks the organogenesis of immature larval stages via hormonal or enzymatic actions.²⁰ The combination of an insecticide and an insect growth regulator appears to be most effective in their synergistic actions against adult fleas and larvae. There have been reports of insecticidal resistance in the flea population, especially with pyrethroids.^21,22 A professional exterminator and veterinarian should be consulted. In recalcitrant cases, evaluation for other wild mammals or birds should be performed in unoccupied areas of the home such as the attic, crawl spaces, and basements, as well as inside walls.

Conclusion

The human flea, P irritans, is an important vector in the transmission of human diseases such as the bubonic plague, bartonellosis, and rickettsioses. Flea bites present as intensely pruritic, urticarial to vesicular papules that most commonly present on the lower extremities. Flea bites can be treated with topical steroids, and fleas can be controlled by a combination of insecticidal products and insect growth regulators.

Characteristics

The ubiquitous human flea, Pulex irritans, is a hematophagous wingless ectoparasite in the order Siphonaptera (wingless siphon) that survives by consuming the blood of its mammalian and avian hosts. Due to diseases such as the bubonic plague, fleas have claimed more victims than all the wars ever fought; in the 14th century, the Black Death caused more than 200 million deaths. Fleas fossilized in amber have been found to be 200 million years old and closely resemble the modern human flea, demonstrating the resilience of the species.

The adult human flea is a small, reddish brown, laterally compressed, wingless insect that is approximately 2- to 3.5-mm long (females, 2.5–3.5 mm; males, 2–2.5 mm) and enclosed by a tough cuticle. Compared to the dog flea (Ctenocephalides canis) and cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis), P irritans has no combs or ctenidia (Figure 1). Fleas have large powerful hind legs enabling them to jump horizontally or vertically 200 times their body length (equivalent to a 6-foot human jumping 1200 feet) using stored muscle energy in a pad on the hind legs composed of the elastic protein resilin.¹ They feed off a wide variety of hosts, including humans, pigs, cats, dogs, goats, sheep, cattle, chickens, owls, foxes, rabbits, mice, and feral cats. The flea’s mouthparts are highly specialized for piercing the skin and sucking its blood meal via direct capillary cannulation.

Life Cycle

There are 4 stages of the flea life cycle: egg, larva, pupa, and adult. Most adult flea species mate on the host; the female will lay an average of 4 to 8 small white eggs on the host after each blood meal, laying more than 400 eggs during her lifetime. The eggs then drop from the host and hatch in approximately 4 to 6 days to become larvae. The active larvae feed on available organic matter in their environment, such as their parents’ feces and detritus, while undergoing 3 molts within 1 week to several months.² The larva then spins a silken cocoon from modified salivary glands to form the pupa. In favorable conditions, the pupa lasts only a few weeks; however, it can last for a year or more in unfavorable conditions. Triggers for emergence of the adult flea from the pupa include high humidity, warm temperatures, increased levels of carbon dioxide, and vibrations including sound. An adult P irritans flea can live for a few weeks to more than 1.5 years in favorable conditions of lower air temperature, high relative humidity, and access to a host.³

Related Diseases

Pulex irritans can be a vector for several human diseases. Yersinia pestis is a gram-negative bacteria that causes plague, a highly virulent disease that killed millions of people during its 3 largest human pandemics. The black rat (Rattus rattus) and the oriental rat flea (Xenopsylla cheopis) have been implicated as initial vectors; however, transmission may be human-to-human with pneumonic plague, and septicemic plague may be spread via Pulex fleas or body lice.^4,5 In 1971, Y pestis was isolated from P irritans on a dog in the home of a plague patient in Kayenta, Arizona.⁶Yersinia pestis bacterial DNA also was extracted from P irritans during a plague outbreak in Madagascar in 2014⁷ and was implicated in epidemiologic studies of plague in Tanzania from 1986 to 2004, suggesting it also plays a role in endemic disease.⁸

Bartonellosis is an emerging disease caused by different species of the gram-negative intracellular bacteria of the genus Bartonella transmitted by lice, ticks, and fleas. Bartonella quintana causes trench fever primarily transmitted by the human body louse, Pediculus humanus corporis, and resulted in more than 1 million cases during World War I. Trench fever is characterized by headache, fever, dizziness, and shin pain that lasts 1 to 3 days and recurs in cycles every 4 to 6 days. Other clinical manifestations of B quintana include chronic bacteremia, endocarditis, lymphadenopathy, and bacillary angiomatosis.⁹Bartonella henselae causes cat scratch fever, characterized by lymphadenopathy, fever, headache, joint pain, and lethargy from infected cat scratches or the bite of an infected flea. Bartonella rochalimae also has been found to cause a trench fever–like bacteremia.¹⁰Bartonella species have been found in P irritans, and the flea is implicated as a vector of bartonellosis in humans.^11-15

Rickettsioses are worldwide diseases caused by the gram-negative intracellular bacteria of the genus Rickettsia transmitted to humans via hematophagous arthropods. The rickettsiae traditionally have been classified into the spotted fever or typhus groups. The spotted fever group (ie, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, Mediterranean spotted fever) is transmitted via ticks. The typhus group is transmitted via lice (epidemic typhus) and fleas (endemic or murine typhus). Murine typhus can be caused by Rickettsia typhi in warm coastal areas around the world where the main mammal reservoir is the rat and the rat flea vector X cheopis. Clinical signs of infection are abrupt onset of fever, headaches, myalgia, malaise, and chills, with a truncal maculopapular rash progressing peripherally several days after the initial clinical signs. Rash is present in up to 50% of cases.¹⁶Rickettsia felis is an emerging flea-borne pathogen causing an acute febrile illness usually transmitted via the cat flea C felis.¹⁷Rickettsia species DNA have been found to be present in P irritans from dogs¹⁸ and livestock¹⁹ and pose a risk for causing rickettsioses in humans.

Environmental Treatment and Prevention

Flea bites present as intense, pruritic, urticarial to vesicular papules that usually are located on the lower extremities but also can be present on exposed areas of the upper extremities and hands (Figure 2). Human fleas infest clothing, and bites can be widespread. Topical antipruritics and corticosteroids can be used for controlling itch and the intense cutaneous inflammatory response. The flea host should be identified in areas of the home, school, farm, work, or local environment. House pets should be examined and treated by a veterinarian. The pet’s bedding should be washed and dried at high temperatures, and carpets and floors should be routinely vacuumed or cleaned to remove eggs, larvae, flea feces, and/or pupae. The killing of adult fleas with insecticidal products (eg, imidacloprid, fipronil, spinosad, selamectin, lufenuron, ivermectin) is the primary method of flea control. Use of insect growth regulators such as pyriproxyfen inhibits adult reproduction and blocks the organogenesis of immature larval stages via hormonal or enzymatic actions.²⁰ The combination of an insecticide and an insect growth regulator appears to be most effective in their synergistic actions against adult fleas and larvae. There have been reports of insecticidal resistance in the flea population, especially with pyrethroids.^21,22 A professional exterminator and veterinarian should be consulted. In recalcitrant cases, evaluation for other wild mammals or birds should be performed in unoccupied areas of the home such as the attic, crawl spaces, and basements, as well as inside walls.

Conclusion

The human flea, P irritans, is an important vector in the transmission of human diseases such as the bubonic plague, bartonellosis, and rickettsioses. Flea bites present as intensely pruritic, urticarial to vesicular papules that most commonly present on the lower extremities. Flea bites can be treated with topical steroids, and fleas can be controlled by a combination of insecticidal products and insect growth regulators.

Characteristics

The ubiquitous human flea, Pulex irritans, is a hematophagous wingless ectoparasite in the order Siphonaptera (wingless siphon) that survives by consuming the blood of its mammalian and avian hosts. Due to diseases such as the bubonic plague, fleas have claimed more victims than all the wars ever fought; in the 14th century, the Black Death caused more than 200 million deaths. Fleas fossilized in amber have been found to be 200 million years old and closely resemble the modern human flea, demonstrating the resilience of the species.

The adult human flea is a small, reddish brown, laterally compressed, wingless insect that is approximately 2- to 3.5-mm long (females, 2.5–3.5 mm; males, 2–2.5 mm) and enclosed by a tough cuticle. Compared to the dog flea (Ctenocephalides canis) and cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis), P irritans has no combs or ctenidia (Figure 1). Fleas have large powerful hind legs enabling them to jump horizontally or vertically 200 times their body length (equivalent to a 6-foot human jumping 1200 feet) using stored muscle energy in a pad on the hind legs composed of the elastic protein resilin.¹ They feed off a wide variety of hosts, including humans, pigs, cats, dogs, goats, sheep, cattle, chickens, owls, foxes, rabbits, mice, and feral cats. The flea’s mouthparts are highly specialized for piercing the skin and sucking its blood meal via direct capillary cannulation.

Life Cycle

There are 4 stages of the flea life cycle: egg, larva, pupa, and adult. Most adult flea species mate on the host; the female will lay an average of 4 to 8 small white eggs on the host after each blood meal, laying more than 400 eggs during her lifetime. The eggs then drop from the host and hatch in approximately 4 to 6 days to become larvae. The active larvae feed on available organic matter in their environment, such as their parents’ feces and detritus, while undergoing 3 molts within 1 week to several months.² The larva then spins a silken cocoon from modified salivary glands to form the pupa. In favorable conditions, the pupa lasts only a few weeks; however, it can last for a year or more in unfavorable conditions. Triggers for emergence of the adult flea from the pupa include high humidity, warm temperatures, increased levels of carbon dioxide, and vibrations including sound. An adult P irritans flea can live for a few weeks to more than 1.5 years in favorable conditions of lower air temperature, high relative humidity, and access to a host.³

Related Diseases

Pulex irritans can be a vector for several human diseases. Yersinia pestis is a gram-negative bacteria that causes plague, a highly virulent disease that killed millions of people during its 3 largest human pandemics. The black rat (Rattus rattus) and the oriental rat flea (Xenopsylla cheopis) have been implicated as initial vectors; however, transmission may be human-to-human with pneumonic plague, and septicemic plague may be spread via Pulex fleas or body lice.^4,5 In 1971, Y pestis was isolated from P irritans on a dog in the home of a plague patient in Kayenta, Arizona.⁶Yersinia pestis bacterial DNA also was extracted from P irritans during a plague outbreak in Madagascar in 2014⁷ and was implicated in epidemiologic studies of plague in Tanzania from 1986 to 2004, suggesting it also plays a role in endemic disease.⁸

Bartonellosis is an emerging disease caused by different species of the gram-negative intracellular bacteria of the genus Bartonella transmitted by lice, ticks, and fleas. Bartonella quintana causes trench fever primarily transmitted by the human body louse, Pediculus humanus corporis, and resulted in more than 1 million cases during World War I. Trench fever is characterized by headache, fever, dizziness, and shin pain that lasts 1 to 3 days and recurs in cycles every 4 to 6 days. Other clinical manifestations of B quintana include chronic bacteremia, endocarditis, lymphadenopathy, and bacillary angiomatosis.⁹Bartonella henselae causes cat scratch fever, characterized by lymphadenopathy, fever, headache, joint pain, and lethargy from infected cat scratches or the bite of an infected flea. Bartonella rochalimae also has been found to cause a trench fever–like bacteremia.¹⁰Bartonella species have been found in P irritans, and the flea is implicated as a vector of bartonellosis in humans.^11-15

Rickettsioses are worldwide diseases caused by the gram-negative intracellular bacteria of the genus Rickettsia transmitted to humans via hematophagous arthropods. The rickettsiae traditionally have been classified into the spotted fever or typhus groups. The spotted fever group (ie, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, Mediterranean spotted fever) is transmitted via ticks. The typhus group is transmitted via lice (epidemic typhus) and fleas (endemic or murine typhus). Murine typhus can be caused by Rickettsia typhi in warm coastal areas around the world where the main mammal reservoir is the rat and the rat flea vector X cheopis. Clinical signs of infection are abrupt onset of fever, headaches, myalgia, malaise, and chills, with a truncal maculopapular rash progressing peripherally several days after the initial clinical signs. Rash is present in up to 50% of cases.¹⁶Rickettsia felis is an emerging flea-borne pathogen causing an acute febrile illness usually transmitted via the cat flea C felis.¹⁷Rickettsia species DNA have been found to be present in P irritans from dogs¹⁸ and livestock¹⁹ and pose a risk for causing rickettsioses in humans.

Environmental Treatment and Prevention

Flea bites present as intense, pruritic, urticarial to vesicular papules that usually are located on the lower extremities but also can be present on exposed areas of the upper extremities and hands (Figure 2). Human fleas infest clothing, and bites can be widespread. Topical antipruritics and corticosteroids can be used for controlling itch and the intense cutaneous inflammatory response. The flea host should be identified in areas of the home, school, farm, work, or local environment. House pets should be examined and treated by a veterinarian. The pet’s bedding should be washed and dried at high temperatures, and carpets and floors should be routinely vacuumed or cleaned to remove eggs, larvae, flea feces, and/or pupae. The killing of adult fleas with insecticidal products (eg, imidacloprid, fipronil, spinosad, selamectin, lufenuron, ivermectin) is the primary method of flea control. Use of insect growth regulators such as pyriproxyfen inhibits adult reproduction and blocks the organogenesis of immature larval stages via hormonal or enzymatic actions.²⁰ The combination of an insecticide and an insect growth regulator appears to be most effective in their synergistic actions against adult fleas and larvae. There have been reports of insecticidal resistance in the flea population, especially with pyrethroids.^21,22 A professional exterminator and veterinarian should be consulted. In recalcitrant cases, evaluation for other wild mammals or birds should be performed in unoccupied areas of the home such as the attic, crawl spaces, and basements, as well as inside walls.

Conclusion

The human flea, P irritans, is an important vector in the transmission of human diseases such as the bubonic plague, bartonellosis, and rickettsioses. Flea bites present as intensely pruritic, urticarial to vesicular papules that most commonly present on the lower extremities. Flea bites can be treated with topical steroids, and fleas can be controlled by a combination of insecticidal products and insect growth regulators.

Practice Gap

Nonmelanoma skin cancers most commonly are found on the head and neck. In these locations, many of these malignancies will meet criteria to undergo treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery. It is becoming increasingly common for patients to have multiple lesions treated at the same time, and sometimes these lesions can be in close proximity to one another. The final size of the adjacent defects, along with the amount of normal tissue remaining between them, will determine how to best repair both defects.¹ Many times, repair options are limited to the use of a larger and more extensive repair such as a flap or graft. We present a novel option to increase the options for surgical repair.

The Technique

We present a case of 2 large adjacent postsurgical defects where intraoperative tissue relaxation allowed for successful primary linear closure of both defects under notably decreased tension from baseline. A 70-year-old man presented for treatment of 2 adjacent invasive squamous cell carcinomas on the left temple and left frontal scalp. The initial lesion sizes were 2.0×1.0 and 2.0×2.0 cm, respectively. Mohs micrographic surgery was performed on both lesions, and the final defect sizes measured 2.0×1.4 and 3.0×1.6 cm, respectively. The island of normal tissue between the defects measured 2.3-cm wide. Different repair options were discussed with the patient, including allowing 1 or both lesions to heal via secondary intention, creating 1 large wound to repair with a full-thickness skin graft, using a large skin flap to cover both wounds, or utilizing a 2-to-Z flap.² We also discussed using an intraoperative skin relaxation device to stretch the skin around 1 or both defects and close both defects in a linear fashion; the patient opted for the latter treatment option.

The left temple had adequate mobility to perform a primary closure oriented horizontally along the long axis of the defect. Although it would have been a simple repair for this lesion, the superior defect on the frontal scalp would have been subjected to increased downward tension. The scalp defect was already under considerable tension with limited tissue mobility, so closing the temple defect horizontally would have required repair of the scalp defect using a skin graft or leaving it open to heal on its own. Similarly, the force necessary to close the frontal scalp wound first would have prevented primary closure of the temple defect.

A SUTUREGARD ISR device (Sutureguard Medical Inc) was secured centrally over both defects at a 90° angle to one another to provide intraoperative tissue relaxation without undermining. The devices were held in place by a US Pharmacopeia 2-0 nylon suture and allowed to sit for 60 minutes (Figure 1).³

Practice Implications

The methods of repairing 2 adjacent postsurgical defects are numerous and vary depending on the size of the individual defects, the location of the defects, and the amount of normal skin remaining between them. Various methods of closure for the adjacent defects include healing by secondary intention, primary linear closure, skin grafts, skin flaps, creating 1 larger wound to be repaired, or a combination of these approaches.^1,2,4,5

In our patient, closing the high-tension wound of the scalp would have prevented both wounds from being closed in a linear fashion without first stretching the tissue. Although Zitelli⁵ has cited that many wounds will heal well on their own despite a large size, many patients prefer the cosmetic appearance and shorter healing time of wounds that have been closed with sutures, particularly if those defects are greater than 8-mm wide. In contrast, patients preferred the cosmetic appearance of 4-mm wounds that healed via secondary intention.⁶ In our case, we closed the majority of the wound and left a small 4-mm-wide portion to heal on its own. The overall outcome was excellent and healed much quicker than leaving the entire scalp defect to heal by secondary intention.

The other methods of closure, such as a 2-to-Z flap, would have been difficult given the orientation of the lesions and the island between them.² To create this flap, an extensive amount of undermining would have been necessary, leading to serious disruption of the blood and nerve supply and an increased risk for flap necrosis. Creating 1 large wound and repairing with a flap would have similar requirements and complications.

Intraoperative tissue relaxation can be used to allow primary closure of adjacent wounds without the need for undermining. Prior research has shown that 30 minutes of stress relaxation with 20 Newtons of applied tension yields a 65% reduction in wound-closure tension.⁷ Orienting the devices between 45° to 90° angles to one another creates opposing tension vectors so that the closure of one defect does not prevent the closure of the other defect. Even in cases in which the defects cannot be completely approximated, closing the wound edges to create a smaller central defect can decrease healing time and lead to an excellent cosmetic outcome without the need for a flap or graft.

The SUTUREGARD ISR suture retention bridge also is cost-effective for the surgeon and the patient. The device and suture-guide washer are included in a set that retails for $35 each or $300 for a box of 12.⁸ The suture most commonly used to secure the device in our practice is 2-0 nylon and retails for approximately $34 for a box of 12,⁹ which brings the total cost with the device to around $38 per use. The updated Current Procedural Terminology guidelines from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services define that an intermediate repair requires a layered closure and may include, but does not require, limited undermining. A complex linear closure must meet criteria for an intermediate closure plus at least 1 additional criterion, such as exposure of cartilage, bone, or tendons within the defect; extensive undermining; wound-edge debridement; involvement of free margins; or use of a retention suture.¹⁰ Use of a suture retention bridge such as the SUTUREGARD ISR device and therefore a retention suture qualifies the repair as a complex linear closure. Overall, use of the device expands the surgeon’s choices for surgical closures and helps to limit the need for larger, more invasive repair procedures.

Practice Gap

Nonmelanoma skin cancers most commonly are found on the head and neck. In these locations, many of these malignancies will meet criteria to undergo treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery. It is becoming increasingly common for patients to have multiple lesions treated at the same time, and sometimes these lesions can be in close proximity to one another. The final size of the adjacent defects, along with the amount of normal tissue remaining between them, will determine how to best repair both defects.¹ Many times, repair options are limited to the use of a larger and more extensive repair such as a flap or graft. We present a novel option to increase the options for surgical repair.

The Technique

We present a case of 2 large adjacent postsurgical defects where intraoperative tissue relaxation allowed for successful primary linear closure of both defects under notably decreased tension from baseline. A 70-year-old man presented for treatment of 2 adjacent invasive squamous cell carcinomas on the left temple and left frontal scalp. The initial lesion sizes were 2.0×1.0 and 2.0×2.0 cm, respectively. Mohs micrographic surgery was performed on both lesions, and the final defect sizes measured 2.0×1.4 and 3.0×1.6 cm, respectively. The island of normal tissue between the defects measured 2.3-cm wide. Different repair options were discussed with the patient, including allowing 1 or both lesions to heal via secondary intention, creating 1 large wound to repair with a full-thickness skin graft, using a large skin flap to cover both wounds, or utilizing a 2-to-Z flap.² We also discussed using an intraoperative skin relaxation device to stretch the skin around 1 or both defects and close both defects in a linear fashion; the patient opted for the latter treatment option.

The left temple had adequate mobility to perform a primary closure oriented horizontally along the long axis of the defect. Although it would have been a simple repair for this lesion, the superior defect on the frontal scalp would have been subjected to increased downward tension. The scalp defect was already under considerable tension with limited tissue mobility, so closing the temple defect horizontally would have required repair of the scalp defect using a skin graft or leaving it open to heal on its own. Similarly, the force necessary to close the frontal scalp wound first would have prevented primary closure of the temple defect.

A SUTUREGARD ISR device (Sutureguard Medical Inc) was secured centrally over both defects at a 90° angle to one another to provide intraoperative tissue relaxation without undermining. The devices were held in place by a US Pharmacopeia 2-0 nylon suture and allowed to sit for 60 minutes (Figure 1).³

Practice Implications

The methods of repairing 2 adjacent postsurgical defects are numerous and vary depending on the size of the individual defects, the location of the defects, and the amount of normal skin remaining between them. Various methods of closure for the adjacent defects include healing by secondary intention, primary linear closure, skin grafts, skin flaps, creating 1 larger wound to be repaired, or a combination of these approaches.^1,2,4,5

In our patient, closing the high-tension wound of the scalp would have prevented both wounds from being closed in a linear fashion without first stretching the tissue. Although Zitelli⁵ has cited that many wounds will heal well on their own despite a large size, many patients prefer the cosmetic appearance and shorter healing time of wounds that have been closed with sutures, particularly if those defects are greater than 8-mm wide. In contrast, patients preferred the cosmetic appearance of 4-mm wounds that healed via secondary intention.⁶ In our case, we closed the majority of the wound and left a small 4-mm-wide portion to heal on its own. The overall outcome was excellent and healed much quicker than leaving the entire scalp defect to heal by secondary intention.

The other methods of closure, such as a 2-to-Z flap, would have been difficult given the orientation of the lesions and the island between them.² To create this flap, an extensive amount of undermining would have been necessary, leading to serious disruption of the blood and nerve supply and an increased risk for flap necrosis. Creating 1 large wound and repairing with a flap would have similar requirements and complications.

Intraoperative tissue relaxation can be used to allow primary closure of adjacent wounds without the need for undermining. Prior research has shown that 30 minutes of stress relaxation with 20 Newtons of applied tension yields a 65% reduction in wound-closure tension.⁷ Orienting the devices between 45° to 90° angles to one another creates opposing tension vectors so that the closure of one defect does not prevent the closure of the other defect. Even in cases in which the defects cannot be completely approximated, closing the wound edges to create a smaller central defect can decrease healing time and lead to an excellent cosmetic outcome without the need for a flap or graft.

The SUTUREGARD ISR suture retention bridge also is cost-effective for the surgeon and the patient. The device and suture-guide washer are included in a set that retails for $35 each or $300 for a box of 12.⁸ The suture most commonly used to secure the device in our practice is 2-0 nylon and retails for approximately $34 for a box of 12,⁹ which brings the total cost with the device to around $38 per use. The updated Current Procedural Terminology guidelines from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services define that an intermediate repair requires a layered closure and may include, but does not require, limited undermining. A complex linear closure must meet criteria for an intermediate closure plus at least 1 additional criterion, such as exposure of cartilage, bone, or tendons within the defect; extensive undermining; wound-edge debridement; involvement of free margins; or use of a retention suture.¹⁰ Use of a suture retention bridge such as the SUTUREGARD ISR device and therefore a retention suture qualifies the repair as a complex linear closure. Overall, use of the device expands the surgeon’s choices for surgical closures and helps to limit the need for larger, more invasive repair procedures.

Practice Gap

Nonmelanoma skin cancers most commonly are found on the head and neck. In these locations, many of these malignancies will meet criteria to undergo treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery. It is becoming increasingly common for patients to have multiple lesions treated at the same time, and sometimes these lesions can be in close proximity to one another. The final size of the adjacent defects, along with the amount of normal tissue remaining between them, will determine how to best repair both defects.¹ Many times, repair options are limited to the use of a larger and more extensive repair such as a flap or graft. We present a novel option to increase the options for surgical repair.

The Technique

We present a case of 2 large adjacent postsurgical defects where intraoperative tissue relaxation allowed for successful primary linear closure of both defects under notably decreased tension from baseline. A 70-year-old man presented for treatment of 2 adjacent invasive squamous cell carcinomas on the left temple and left frontal scalp. The initial lesion sizes were 2.0×1.0 and 2.0×2.0 cm, respectively. Mohs micrographic surgery was performed on both lesions, and the final defect sizes measured 2.0×1.4 and 3.0×1.6 cm, respectively. The island of normal tissue between the defects measured 2.3-cm wide. Different repair options were discussed with the patient, including allowing 1 or both lesions to heal via secondary intention, creating 1 large wound to repair with a full-thickness skin graft, using a large skin flap to cover both wounds, or utilizing a 2-to-Z flap.² We also discussed using an intraoperative skin relaxation device to stretch the skin around 1 or both defects and close both defects in a linear fashion; the patient opted for the latter treatment option.

The left temple had adequate mobility to perform a primary closure oriented horizontally along the long axis of the defect. Although it would have been a simple repair for this lesion, the superior defect on the frontal scalp would have been subjected to increased downward tension. The scalp defect was already under considerable tension with limited tissue mobility, so closing the temple defect horizontally would have required repair of the scalp defect using a skin graft or leaving it open to heal on its own. Similarly, the force necessary to close the frontal scalp wound first would have prevented primary closure of the temple defect.

A SUTUREGARD ISR device (Sutureguard Medical Inc) was secured centrally over both defects at a 90° angle to one another to provide intraoperative tissue relaxation without undermining. The devices were held in place by a US Pharmacopeia 2-0 nylon suture and allowed to sit for 60 minutes (Figure 1).³

Practice Implications

The methods of repairing 2 adjacent postsurgical defects are numerous and vary depending on the size of the individual defects, the location of the defects, and the amount of normal skin remaining between them. Various methods of closure for the adjacent defects include healing by secondary intention, primary linear closure, skin grafts, skin flaps, creating 1 larger wound to be repaired, or a combination of these approaches.^1,2,4,5

In our patient, closing the high-tension wound of the scalp would have prevented both wounds from being closed in a linear fashion without first stretching the tissue. Although Zitelli⁵ has cited that many wounds will heal well on their own despite a large size, many patients prefer the cosmetic appearance and shorter healing time of wounds that have been closed with sutures, particularly if those defects are greater than 8-mm wide. In contrast, patients preferred the cosmetic appearance of 4-mm wounds that healed via secondary intention.⁶ In our case, we closed the majority of the wound and left a small 4-mm-wide portion to heal on its own. The overall outcome was excellent and healed much quicker than leaving the entire scalp defect to heal by secondary intention.

The other methods of closure, such as a 2-to-Z flap, would have been difficult given the orientation of the lesions and the island between them.² To create this flap, an extensive amount of undermining would have been necessary, leading to serious disruption of the blood and nerve supply and an increased risk for flap necrosis. Creating 1 large wound and repairing with a flap would have similar requirements and complications.

Intraoperative tissue relaxation can be used to allow primary closure of adjacent wounds without the need for undermining. Prior research has shown that 30 minutes of stress relaxation with 20 Newtons of applied tension yields a 65% reduction in wound-closure tension.⁷ Orienting the devices between 45° to 90° angles to one another creates opposing tension vectors so that the closure of one defect does not prevent the closure of the other defect. Even in cases in which the defects cannot be completely approximated, closing the wound edges to create a smaller central defect can decrease healing time and lead to an excellent cosmetic outcome without the need for a flap or graft.

The SUTUREGARD ISR suture retention bridge also is cost-effective for the surgeon and the patient. The device and suture-guide washer are included in a set that retails for $35 each or $300 for a box of 12.⁸ The suture most commonly used to secure the device in our practice is 2-0 nylon and retails for approximately $34 for a box of 12,⁹ which brings the total cost with the device to around $38 per use. The updated Current Procedural Terminology guidelines from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services define that an intermediate repair requires a layered closure and may include, but does not require, limited undermining. A complex linear closure must meet criteria for an intermediate closure plus at least 1 additional criterion, such as exposure of cartilage, bone, or tendons within the defect; extensive undermining; wound-edge debridement; involvement of free margins; or use of a retention suture.¹⁰ Use of a suture retention bridge such as the SUTUREGARD ISR device and therefore a retention suture qualifies the repair as a complex linear closure. Overall, use of the device expands the surgeon’s choices for surgical closures and helps to limit the need for larger, more invasive repair procedures.

Pilonidal disease (PD) is common in Turkey. In a study in Turkey, 19,013 young patients aged 17 to 28 years were examined; PD was detected in 6.6% of patients (0.37% of females in the cohort and 6.23% of males).¹ The incidence of PD in military personnel (women 18 years and older; men 22 years and older) is remarkably higher, with an incidence of 9% reported in Turkish soldiers.²

Pilonidal disease has become common in Turkish adolescents, who now experience an increase in desk time because of computer use and a long duration of preparation for high school and university entrance examinations. In adolescent and adult population studies, Yildiz et al³ and Harlak et al⁴ reported that sitting for 6 hours or more per day was found to significantly increase the risk for PD compared to the control group (P=.028 and P<.001, respectively).

Surgery for PD often is followed by a considerable and unpleasant postoperative course, with a long period of limited physical activity, loss of school time, and reduced social relationships. The recurrence rate of PD is reported to be as high as 40% to 50% after incision and drainage, 40% to 55% with rigorous hygiene and weekly shaving, and as high as 30% following operative intervention. Drawbacks of operative intervention include associated morbidity; lost work and school time; and prolonged wound healing, which can take days to months.^5-7

For these reasons, minimally invasive surgical techniques have become popular for treating PD in adolescents, as surgery can cause less disruption of the school and examination schedule and provide an earlier return to normal activities. Gips et al⁸—who operated on 1358 adults using skin trephines to extirpate pilonidal pits and the underlying fistulous tract and hair debris—reported a low recurrence rate and good postoperative functional outcomes with this technique. Herein, we present our short-duration experience with the Gips procedure of minimally invasive sinusectomy in adolescent PD.

Methods

Patients
We performed a retrospective medical record review of patients with symptomatic PD who were treated in our clinic between January 2018 and February 2019 using the Gips procedure of minimally invasive sinusectomy. We identified 19 patients younger than 17 years. Patients with acute inflammation and an acute undrained collection of pits were treated with incision and drainage, with close clinical follow-up until inflammation resolved. We also recommended that patients take a warm sitz bath at least once daily and chemically epilate the hair in the affected area if they were hirsute.

Gips Procedure
For all patients, the Gips procedure was performed in the left lateral position under general anesthesia using a laryngeal mask airway for anesthesia. Patients were closely shaved (if hirsute) then prepared with povidone-iodine solution. First, each fistulous opening was probed to assess depth and direction of underlying tracts using a thin (0.5–1.0 mm), round-tipped probe. Next, a trephine—comprising a cylindrical blade on a handle—was used to remove cylindrical cores of tissue. All visible median pits and lateral fistulous skin openings were excised using skin trephines of various diameters (Figure, A and B). Once the pilonidal cavity was reached, attention was directed to removing all residual underlying tissue—granulation tissue, debris, and hair—through all available accesses. The cavity was cleaned with hydrogen peroxide and normal saline. Then, all trephine-made openings were left unpacked or were packed for only a few hours and were not sutured (Figure, C and D); a light gauze bandage was eventually applied with a minimum of tape and skin traction. Patients were kept supine during a 1- or 2-hour clinical observation period before they were discharged.

Results

Of the 19 patients who underwent the Gips procedure, 17 (90%) were male; 2 (10%) were female. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) body mass index was 25 (3.7). (Body mass index was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.) The mean age (SD) of patients was 15 (1.1) years (range, 12–17 years). The most common symptom at presentation was purulent discharge (11/19 [58%]). Other common symptoms included pain (8/19 [42%]), pilonidal abscess (6/19 [32%]), and bleeding (4/19 [21%]). Nine patients (47%) had prior abscess drainage at presentation; 1 (5%) had previously undergone surgery, and 5 (26%) previously had phenol injections.

The median (SD) length of stay in the hospital was 15 (3.2) hours (range, 11–22 hours). The mean (SD) time before returning to daily activities and school was 2 (0.6) days (range, 1–3 days). In our patients, the Gips procedure was performed on either a Thursday or more often a Friday; therefore, patients could be scheduled to be discharged from the hospital and return to home the next day, and then return to school on Monday. All patients were advised to take an oral analgesic for 2 days following the procedure.

The mean (SD) duration of the operative procedure was 14 (3) minutes (range, 10–20 minutes). One patient (5%) developed bleeding that ceased spontaneously. The mean (SD) complete wound healing time was 3 (0.6) weeks (range, 2–4 weeks).

Postoperative clinical examination and telephone interviews were performed for follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 5 months (range, 1–13 months); 17 of 19 patients (89%) made a complete recovery. Two patients (11%) reported recurrence in the third and fourth months following the procedure and were treated with a repeat Gips procedure 6 months after the first treatment. Improvement was noted after a second Gips procedure in 1 of 2 patients who had recurrence, leaving the success rate of the procedure in our practice at 95% (18/19).

Comment

Treatment Options for PD
Various treatment methods for PD have been postulated,^5-7 including incision and drainage, hair removal and hygiene alone, excision and primary wound closure, excision and secondary wound closure, and various flap techniques. More recently, there has been a dramatic shift to management of patients with PD in an outpatient setting. The Gips procedure, an innovative minimally surgical technique for PD, was introduced in 2008 based on a large consecutive series of more than 1300 patients.⁸ Studies have shown promising results and minimal recovery time for the Gips procedure in adult and pediatric patients.^8-10

Nevertheless, conventional excision down to the sacral fascia, with or without midline or asymmetrical closure, is still the procedure performed most often for PD worldwide.^5,10 This surgery often requires general anesthesia and a long period of postoperative care; furthermore, children who undergo conventional excision at this age generally experience lengthy periods of missing school. In addition, conventional excision is associated with a notable recurrence rate and a potentially unacceptable cosmetic result.^10,11 Therefore, we prefer the Gips procedure of minimally invasive sinusectomy to treat PD in adolescents.

A larger study from an Israeli military pilonidal sinus clinic, in which 1358 adult PD patients were treated with the Gips procedure under local anesthesia, showed a recurrence rate of 13% at 5 years and 16% at 10 years.⁸Di Castro et al¹⁰ reported use of the same technique on 2347 patients and demonstrated a recurrence rate of 5.8% at a median follow-up of 16 months. Speter et al⁹ compared minimal incision using trephines and wide excision on a matched cohort of 42 adolescent patients (mean age, 16 years). Findings indicated better functional outcomes, shorter duration of analgesia required (≤48 hours), and fewer sick days in the minimal incision group but failed to demonstrate a statistically significant difference in overall recurrence. An overall favorable outcome was reported in 61.9% (26/42) of patients in the minimal incision group and 45% (19/42) in the wide excision group. Reoperation was performed in 28% (12/42) of patients in the minimal incision group and 9% (4/42) of the wide excision group.⁹ Delshad et al⁵ found that pit-picking procedures resolved pilonidal symptoms in 92% (47/51) of patients, without recurrence at 5 months on average.

Advantages of the Gips Procedure
Advantages of the Gips procedure are numerous. It is easily applicable, inexpensive, well tolerated, and requires minimal postoperative care. Placing the patient in the lateral position for the procedure—rather than the prone position that is required for more extensive surgical procedures—is highly feasible, permitting the easy application of a laryngeal mask for anesthesia. The Gips procedure can be performed on patients with severe PD after a period of improved hygiene and hair control and allows for less morbidity than older surgical techniques. Overall, results are satisfactory.

Health services and the hospital admissions process are less costly in university hospitals in Turkey. This procedure costs an average of 400 Turkish liras (<US $50). For that reason, patients in our review were discharged the next day; however, patients could be discharged within a few hours. In the future, it is possible for appropriate cases to be managed in an outpatient setting with sedation and local anesthesia only. Because their postoperative courses are eventless, these patients can be managed without hospitalization.

Recovery is quick and allows for early return to school and other physical activities. Because the procedure was most often performed on the last school day of the week, we did not see any restriction of physical or social activities in our patients.

Lastly, this procedure can be applied to PD patients who have previously undergone extensive surgery or phenol injection, as was the case in our patients.

Conclusion

The Gips procedure is an easy-to-use technique in children and adolescents with PD. It has a high success rate and places fewer restrictions on school and social activities than traditional surgical therapies.

Pilonidal disease (PD) is common in Turkey. In a study in Turkey, 19,013 young patients aged 17 to 28 years were examined; PD was detected in 6.6% of patients (0.37% of females in the cohort and 6.23% of males).¹ The incidence of PD in military personnel (women 18 years and older; men 22 years and older) is remarkably higher, with an incidence of 9% reported in Turkish soldiers.²

Pilonidal disease has become common in Turkish adolescents, who now experience an increase in desk time because of computer use and a long duration of preparation for high school and university entrance examinations. In adolescent and adult population studies, Yildiz et al³ and Harlak et al⁴ reported that sitting for 6 hours or more per day was found to significantly increase the risk for PD compared to the control group (P=.028 and P<.001, respectively).

Surgery for PD often is followed by a considerable and unpleasant postoperative course, with a long period of limited physical activity, loss of school time, and reduced social relationships. The recurrence rate of PD is reported to be as high as 40% to 50% after incision and drainage, 40% to 55% with rigorous hygiene and weekly shaving, and as high as 30% following operative intervention. Drawbacks of operative intervention include associated morbidity; lost work and school time; and prolonged wound healing, which can take days to months.^5-7

For these reasons, minimally invasive surgical techniques have become popular for treating PD in adolescents, as surgery can cause less disruption of the school and examination schedule and provide an earlier return to normal activities. Gips et al⁸—who operated on 1358 adults using skin trephines to extirpate pilonidal pits and the underlying fistulous tract and hair debris—reported a low recurrence rate and good postoperative functional outcomes with this technique. Herein, we present our short-duration experience with the Gips procedure of minimally invasive sinusectomy in adolescent PD.

Methods

Patients
We performed a retrospective medical record review of patients with symptomatic PD who were treated in our clinic between January 2018 and February 2019 using the Gips procedure of minimally invasive sinusectomy. We identified 19 patients younger than 17 years. Patients with acute inflammation and an acute undrained collection of pits were treated with incision and drainage, with close clinical follow-up until inflammation resolved. We also recommended that patients take a warm sitz bath at least once daily and chemically epilate the hair in the affected area if they were hirsute.

Gips Procedure
For all patients, the Gips procedure was performed in the left lateral position under general anesthesia using a laryngeal mask airway for anesthesia. Patients were closely shaved (if hirsute) then prepared with povidone-iodine solution. First, each fistulous opening was probed to assess depth and direction of underlying tracts using a thin (0.5–1.0 mm), round-tipped probe. Next, a trephine—comprising a cylindrical blade on a handle—was used to remove cylindrical cores of tissue. All visible median pits and lateral fistulous skin openings were excised using skin trephines of various diameters (Figure, A and B). Once the pilonidal cavity was reached, attention was directed to removing all residual underlying tissue—granulation tissue, debris, and hair—through all available accesses. The cavity was cleaned with hydrogen peroxide and normal saline. Then, all trephine-made openings were left unpacked or were packed for only a few hours and were not sutured (Figure, C and D); a light gauze bandage was eventually applied with a minimum of tape and skin traction. Patients were kept supine during a 1- or 2-hour clinical observation period before they were discharged.

Results

Of the 19 patients who underwent the Gips procedure, 17 (90%) were male; 2 (10%) were female. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) body mass index was 25 (3.7). (Body mass index was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.) The mean age (SD) of patients was 15 (1.1) years (range, 12–17 years). The most common symptom at presentation was purulent discharge (11/19 [58%]). Other common symptoms included pain (8/19 [42%]), pilonidal abscess (6/19 [32%]), and bleeding (4/19 [21%]). Nine patients (47%) had prior abscess drainage at presentation; 1 (5%) had previously undergone surgery, and 5 (26%) previously had phenol injections.

The median (SD) length of stay in the hospital was 15 (3.2) hours (range, 11–22 hours). The mean (SD) time before returning to daily activities and school was 2 (0.6) days (range, 1–3 days). In our patients, the Gips procedure was performed on either a Thursday or more often a Friday; therefore, patients could be scheduled to be discharged from the hospital and return to home the next day, and then return to school on Monday. All patients were advised to take an oral analgesic for 2 days following the procedure.

The mean (SD) duration of the operative procedure was 14 (3) minutes (range, 10–20 minutes). One patient (5%) developed bleeding that ceased spontaneously. The mean (SD) complete wound healing time was 3 (0.6) weeks (range, 2–4 weeks).

Postoperative clinical examination and telephone interviews were performed for follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 5 months (range, 1–13 months); 17 of 19 patients (89%) made a complete recovery. Two patients (11%) reported recurrence in the third and fourth months following the procedure and were treated with a repeat Gips procedure 6 months after the first treatment. Improvement was noted after a second Gips procedure in 1 of 2 patients who had recurrence, leaving the success rate of the procedure in our practice at 95% (18/19).

Comment

Treatment Options for PD
Various treatment methods for PD have been postulated,^5-7 including incision and drainage, hair removal and hygiene alone, excision and primary wound closure, excision and secondary wound closure, and various flap techniques. More recently, there has been a dramatic shift to management of patients with PD in an outpatient setting. The Gips procedure, an innovative minimally surgical technique for PD, was introduced in 2008 based on a large consecutive series of more than 1300 patients.⁸ Studies have shown promising results and minimal recovery time for the Gips procedure in adult and pediatric patients.^8-10

Nevertheless, conventional excision down to the sacral fascia, with or without midline or asymmetrical closure, is still the procedure performed most often for PD worldwide.^5,10 This surgery often requires general anesthesia and a long period of postoperative care; furthermore, children who undergo conventional excision at this age generally experience lengthy periods of missing school. In addition, conventional excision is associated with a notable recurrence rate and a potentially unacceptable cosmetic result.^10,11 Therefore, we prefer the Gips procedure of minimally invasive sinusectomy to treat PD in adolescents.

A larger study from an Israeli military pilonidal sinus clinic, in which 1358 adult PD patients were treated with the Gips procedure under local anesthesia, showed a recurrence rate of 13% at 5 years and 16% at 10 years.⁸Di Castro et al¹⁰ reported use of the same technique on 2347 patients and demonstrated a recurrence rate of 5.8% at a median follow-up of 16 months. Speter et al⁹ compared minimal incision using trephines and wide excision on a matched cohort of 42 adolescent patients (mean age, 16 years). Findings indicated better functional outcomes, shorter duration of analgesia required (≤48 hours), and fewer sick days in the minimal incision group but failed to demonstrate a statistically significant difference in overall recurrence. An overall favorable outcome was reported in 61.9% (26/42) of patients in the minimal incision group and 45% (19/42) in the wide excision group. Reoperation was performed in 28% (12/42) of patients in the minimal incision group and 9% (4/42) of the wide excision group.⁹ Delshad et al⁵ found that pit-picking procedures resolved pilonidal symptoms in 92% (47/51) of patients, without recurrence at 5 months on average.

Advantages of the Gips Procedure
Advantages of the Gips procedure are numerous. It is easily applicable, inexpensive, well tolerated, and requires minimal postoperative care. Placing the patient in the lateral position for the procedure—rather than the prone position that is required for more extensive surgical procedures—is highly feasible, permitting the easy application of a laryngeal mask for anesthesia. The Gips procedure can be performed on patients with severe PD after a period of improved hygiene and hair control and allows for less morbidity than older surgical techniques. Overall, results are satisfactory.

Health services and the hospital admissions process are less costly in university hospitals in Turkey. This procedure costs an average of 400 Turkish liras (<US $50). For that reason, patients in our review were discharged the next day; however, patients could be discharged within a few hours. In the future, it is possible for appropriate cases to be managed in an outpatient setting with sedation and local anesthesia only. Because their postoperative courses are eventless, these patients can be managed without hospitalization.

Recovery is quick and allows for early return to school and other physical activities. Because the procedure was most often performed on the last school day of the week, we did not see any restriction of physical or social activities in our patients.

Lastly, this procedure can be applied to PD patients who have previously undergone extensive surgery or phenol injection, as was the case in our patients.

Conclusion

The Gips procedure is an easy-to-use technique in children and adolescents with PD. It has a high success rate and places fewer restrictions on school and social activities than traditional surgical therapies.

Pilonidal disease (PD) is common in Turkey. In a study in Turkey, 19,013 young patients aged 17 to 28 years were examined; PD was detected in 6.6% of patients (0.37% of females in the cohort and 6.23% of males).¹ The incidence of PD in military personnel (women 18 years and older; men 22 years and older) is remarkably higher, with an incidence of 9% reported in Turkish soldiers.²

Pilonidal disease has become common in Turkish adolescents, who now experience an increase in desk time because of computer use and a long duration of preparation for high school and university entrance examinations. In adolescent and adult population studies, Yildiz et al³ and Harlak et al⁴ reported that sitting for 6 hours or more per day was found to significantly increase the risk for PD compared to the control group (P=.028 and P<.001, respectively).

Surgery for PD often is followed by a considerable and unpleasant postoperative course, with a long period of limited physical activity, loss of school time, and reduced social relationships. The recurrence rate of PD is reported to be as high as 40% to 50% after incision and drainage, 40% to 55% with rigorous hygiene and weekly shaving, and as high as 30% following operative intervention. Drawbacks of operative intervention include associated morbidity; lost work and school time; and prolonged wound healing, which can take days to months.^5-7

For these reasons, minimally invasive surgical techniques have become popular for treating PD in adolescents, as surgery can cause less disruption of the school and examination schedule and provide an earlier return to normal activities. Gips et al⁸—who operated on 1358 adults using skin trephines to extirpate pilonidal pits and the underlying fistulous tract and hair debris—reported a low recurrence rate and good postoperative functional outcomes with this technique. Herein, we present our short-duration experience with the Gips procedure of minimally invasive sinusectomy in adolescent PD.

Methods

Patients
We performed a retrospective medical record review of patients with symptomatic PD who were treated in our clinic between January 2018 and February 2019 using the Gips procedure of minimally invasive sinusectomy. We identified 19 patients younger than 17 years. Patients with acute inflammation and an acute undrained collection of pits were treated with incision and drainage, with close clinical follow-up until inflammation resolved. We also recommended that patients take a warm sitz bath at least once daily and chemically epilate the hair in the affected area if they were hirsute.

Gips Procedure
For all patients, the Gips procedure was performed in the left lateral position under general anesthesia using a laryngeal mask airway for anesthesia. Patients were closely shaved (if hirsute) then prepared with povidone-iodine solution. First, each fistulous opening was probed to assess depth and direction of underlying tracts using a thin (0.5–1.0 mm), round-tipped probe. Next, a trephine—comprising a cylindrical blade on a handle—was used to remove cylindrical cores of tissue. All visible median pits and lateral fistulous skin openings were excised using skin trephines of various diameters (Figure, A and B). Once the pilonidal cavity was reached, attention was directed to removing all residual underlying tissue—granulation tissue, debris, and hair—through all available accesses. The cavity was cleaned with hydrogen peroxide and normal saline. Then, all trephine-made openings were left unpacked or were packed for only a few hours and were not sutured (Figure, C and D); a light gauze bandage was eventually applied with a minimum of tape and skin traction. Patients were kept supine during a 1- or 2-hour clinical observation period before they were discharged.

Results

Of the 19 patients who underwent the Gips procedure, 17 (90%) were male; 2 (10%) were female. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) body mass index was 25 (3.7). (Body mass index was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.) The mean age (SD) of patients was 15 (1.1) years (range, 12–17 years). The most common symptom at presentation was purulent discharge (11/19 [58%]). Other common symptoms included pain (8/19 [42%]), pilonidal abscess (6/19 [32%]), and bleeding (4/19 [21%]). Nine patients (47%) had prior abscess drainage at presentation; 1 (5%) had previously undergone surgery, and 5 (26%) previously had phenol injections.

The median (SD) length of stay in the hospital was 15 (3.2) hours (range, 11–22 hours). The mean (SD) time before returning to daily activities and school was 2 (0.6) days (range, 1–3 days). In our patients, the Gips procedure was performed on either a Thursday or more often a Friday; therefore, patients could be scheduled to be discharged from the hospital and return to home the next day, and then return to school on Monday. All patients were advised to take an oral analgesic for 2 days following the procedure.

The mean (SD) duration of the operative procedure was 14 (3) minutes (range, 10–20 minutes). One patient (5%) developed bleeding that ceased spontaneously. The mean (SD) complete wound healing time was 3 (0.6) weeks (range, 2–4 weeks).

Postoperative clinical examination and telephone interviews were performed for follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 5 months (range, 1–13 months); 17 of 19 patients (89%) made a complete recovery. Two patients (11%) reported recurrence in the third and fourth months following the procedure and were treated with a repeat Gips procedure 6 months after the first treatment. Improvement was noted after a second Gips procedure in 1 of 2 patients who had recurrence, leaving the success rate of the procedure in our practice at 95% (18/19).

Comment

Treatment Options for PD
Various treatment methods for PD have been postulated,^5-7 including incision and drainage, hair removal and hygiene alone, excision and primary wound closure, excision and secondary wound closure, and various flap techniques. More recently, there has been a dramatic shift to management of patients with PD in an outpatient setting. The Gips procedure, an innovative minimally surgical technique for PD, was introduced in 2008 based on a large consecutive series of more than 1300 patients.⁸ Studies have shown promising results and minimal recovery time for the Gips procedure in adult and pediatric patients.^8-10

Nevertheless, conventional excision down to the sacral fascia, with or without midline or asymmetrical closure, is still the procedure performed most often for PD worldwide.^5,10 This surgery often requires general anesthesia and a long period of postoperative care; furthermore, children who undergo conventional excision at this age generally experience lengthy periods of missing school. In addition, conventional excision is associated with a notable recurrence rate and a potentially unacceptable cosmetic result.^10,11 Therefore, we prefer the Gips procedure of minimally invasive sinusectomy to treat PD in adolescents.

A larger study from an Israeli military pilonidal sinus clinic, in which 1358 adult PD patients were treated with the Gips procedure under local anesthesia, showed a recurrence rate of 13% at 5 years and 16% at 10 years.⁸Di Castro et al¹⁰ reported use of the same technique on 2347 patients and demonstrated a recurrence rate of 5.8% at a median follow-up of 16 months. Speter et al⁹ compared minimal incision using trephines and wide excision on a matched cohort of 42 adolescent patients (mean age, 16 years). Findings indicated better functional outcomes, shorter duration of analgesia required (≤48 hours), and fewer sick days in the minimal incision group but failed to demonstrate a statistically significant difference in overall recurrence. An overall favorable outcome was reported in 61.9% (26/42) of patients in the minimal incision group and 45% (19/42) in the wide excision group. Reoperation was performed in 28% (12/42) of patients in the minimal incision group and 9% (4/42) of the wide excision group.⁹ Delshad et al⁵ found that pit-picking procedures resolved pilonidal symptoms in 92% (47/51) of patients, without recurrence at 5 months on average.

Advantages of the Gips Procedure
Advantages of the Gips procedure are numerous. It is easily applicable, inexpensive, well tolerated, and requires minimal postoperative care. Placing the patient in the lateral position for the procedure—rather than the prone position that is required for more extensive surgical procedures—is highly feasible, permitting the easy application of a laryngeal mask for anesthesia. The Gips procedure can be performed on patients with severe PD after a period of improved hygiene and hair control and allows for less morbidity than older surgical techniques. Overall, results are satisfactory.

Health services and the hospital admissions process are less costly in university hospitals in Turkey. This procedure costs an average of 400 Turkish liras (<US $50). For that reason, patients in our review were discharged the next day; however, patients could be discharged within a few hours. In the future, it is possible for appropriate cases to be managed in an outpatient setting with sedation and local anesthesia only. Because their postoperative courses are eventless, these patients can be managed without hospitalization.

Recovery is quick and allows for early return to school and other physical activities. Because the procedure was most often performed on the last school day of the week, we did not see any restriction of physical or social activities in our patients.

Lastly, this procedure can be applied to PD patients who have previously undergone extensive surgery or phenol injection, as was the case in our patients.

Conclusion

The Gips procedure is an easy-to-use technique in children and adolescents with PD. It has a high success rate and places fewer restrictions on school and social activities than traditional surgical therapies.

Most fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) in the hospital setting or the ED are performed for inappropriate indications, according to new data.

“This is the largest study that focuses exclusively on the use of FIT in the ED, inpatient wards, and in the ICU, and it shows significant misuse,” said investigator Umer Bhatti, MD, from Indiana University, Indianapolis.

The only “validated indication” for FIT is to screen for colorectal cancer. However, “99.5% of the FIT tests done in our study were for inappropriate indications,” he reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology, where the study was honored with an ACG Presidential Poster Award.

And the inappropriate use of FIT in these settings had no positive effect on clinical decision-making, he added.

For their study, Dr. Bhatti and colleagues looked at all instances of FIT use in their hospital’s electronic medical records from November 2017 to October 2019 to assess how often FIT was being used, the indications for which it was being used, and the impact of its use on clinical care.

They identified 550 patients, 48% of whom were women, who underwent at least one FIT test. Mean age of the study cohort was 54 years. Only three of the tests, or 0.5%, were performed to screen for colorectal cancer (95% confidence interval, 0.09%-1.52%).

Among the indications documented for FIT were anemia in 242 (44.0%) patients, suspected GI bleeding in 225 (40.9%), abdominal pain in 31 (5.6%), and change in bowel habits in 19 (3.5%).

The tests were performed most often in the ED (45.3%) and on the hospital floor (42.2%), but were also performed in the ICU (10.5%) and burn unit (2.0%).

Overall, 297 of the tests, or 54%, were negative, and 253, or 46%, were positive.

“GI consults were obtained in 46.2% of the FIT-positive group, compared with 13.1% of the FIT-negative patients” (odds ratio, 5.93; 95% CI, 3.88-9.04, P < .0001), Dr. Bhatti reported.

Among FIT-positive patients, those with overt bleeding were more likely to receive a GI consultation than those without (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.9-5.5; P < .0001).

Of the 117 FIT-positive patients who underwent a GI consultation, upper endoscopy was a more common outcome than colonoscopy (51.3% vs. 23.1%; P < .0001). Of the 34 patients who underwent colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, one was diagnosed with colorectal cancer and one with advanced adenoma.

Overt GI bleeding was a better predictor of a GI consultation than a positive FIT result. In fact, use of FIT for patients with overt GI bleeding indicates a poor understanding of the test’s utility, the investigators reported.

“For patients with overt GI bleeding, having a positive FIT made no difference on how often a bleeding source was identified on endoscopy, suggesting that FIT should not be used to guide decisions about endoscopy or hospitalization,” Dr. Bhatti said.

In light of these findings, the team urges their peers to consider measures to reduce FIT tests for unnecessary indications.

“We feel that FIT is unfit for use in the inpatient and emergency settings, and measures should be taken to curb its use,” Dr. Bhatti concluded. “We presented our data to our hospital leadership and a decision was made to remove the FIT as an orderable test from the EMR.”

These results are “striking,” said Jennifer Christie, MD, from the University, Atlanta.

“We should be educating our ER providers and inpatient providers about the proper use of FIT,” she said in an interview. “Another option – and this has been done in many settings with the fecal occult blood test – is just take FIT off the units or out of the ER, so providers won’t be tempted to use it as an assessment of these patients. Because often times, as this study showed, it doesn’t really impact outcomes.”

In fact, unnecessary FI testing could put patients at risk for unnecessary procedures. “We also know that calling for an inpatient or ER consult from a gastroenterologist may increase both length of stay and costs,” she added.

Dr. Bhatti and Dr. Christie disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com.

Most fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) in the hospital setting or the ED are performed for inappropriate indications, according to new data.

“This is the largest study that focuses exclusively on the use of FIT in the ED, inpatient wards, and in the ICU, and it shows significant misuse,” said investigator Umer Bhatti, MD, from Indiana University, Indianapolis.

The only “validated indication” for FIT is to screen for colorectal cancer. However, “99.5% of the FIT tests done in our study were for inappropriate indications,” he reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology, where the study was honored with an ACG Presidential Poster Award.

And the inappropriate use of FIT in these settings had no positive effect on clinical decision-making, he added.

For their study, Dr. Bhatti and colleagues looked at all instances of FIT use in their hospital’s electronic medical records from November 2017 to October 2019 to assess how often FIT was being used, the indications for which it was being used, and the impact of its use on clinical care.

They identified 550 patients, 48% of whom were women, who underwent at least one FIT test. Mean age of the study cohort was 54 years. Only three of the tests, or 0.5%, were performed to screen for colorectal cancer (95% confidence interval, 0.09%-1.52%).

Among the indications documented for FIT were anemia in 242 (44.0%) patients, suspected GI bleeding in 225 (40.9%), abdominal pain in 31 (5.6%), and change in bowel habits in 19 (3.5%).

The tests were performed most often in the ED (45.3%) and on the hospital floor (42.2%), but were also performed in the ICU (10.5%) and burn unit (2.0%).

Overall, 297 of the tests, or 54%, were negative, and 253, or 46%, were positive.

“GI consults were obtained in 46.2% of the FIT-positive group, compared with 13.1% of the FIT-negative patients” (odds ratio, 5.93; 95% CI, 3.88-9.04, P < .0001), Dr. Bhatti reported.

Among FIT-positive patients, those with overt bleeding were more likely to receive a GI consultation than those without (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.9-5.5; P < .0001).

Of the 117 FIT-positive patients who underwent a GI consultation, upper endoscopy was a more common outcome than colonoscopy (51.3% vs. 23.1%; P < .0001). Of the 34 patients who underwent colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, one was diagnosed with colorectal cancer and one with advanced adenoma.

Overt GI bleeding was a better predictor of a GI consultation than a positive FIT result. In fact, use of FIT for patients with overt GI bleeding indicates a poor understanding of the test’s utility, the investigators reported.

“For patients with overt GI bleeding, having a positive FIT made no difference on how often a bleeding source was identified on endoscopy, suggesting that FIT should not be used to guide decisions about endoscopy or hospitalization,” Dr. Bhatti said.

In light of these findings, the team urges their peers to consider measures to reduce FIT tests for unnecessary indications.

“We feel that FIT is unfit for use in the inpatient and emergency settings, and measures should be taken to curb its use,” Dr. Bhatti concluded. “We presented our data to our hospital leadership and a decision was made to remove the FIT as an orderable test from the EMR.”

These results are “striking,” said Jennifer Christie, MD, from the University, Atlanta.

“We should be educating our ER providers and inpatient providers about the proper use of FIT,” she said in an interview. “Another option – and this has been done in many settings with the fecal occult blood test – is just take FIT off the units or out of the ER, so providers won’t be tempted to use it as an assessment of these patients. Because often times, as this study showed, it doesn’t really impact outcomes.”

In fact, unnecessary FI testing could put patients at risk for unnecessary procedures. “We also know that calling for an inpatient or ER consult from a gastroenterologist may increase both length of stay and costs,” she added.

Dr. Bhatti and Dr. Christie disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com.

Most fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) in the hospital setting or the ED are performed for inappropriate indications, according to new data.

“This is the largest study that focuses exclusively on the use of FIT in the ED, inpatient wards, and in the ICU, and it shows significant misuse,” said investigator Umer Bhatti, MD, from Indiana University, Indianapolis.

The only “validated indication” for FIT is to screen for colorectal cancer. However, “99.5% of the FIT tests done in our study were for inappropriate indications,” he reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology, where the study was honored with an ACG Presidential Poster Award.

And the inappropriate use of FIT in these settings had no positive effect on clinical decision-making, he added.

For their study, Dr. Bhatti and colleagues looked at all instances of FIT use in their hospital’s electronic medical records from November 2017 to October 2019 to assess how often FIT was being used, the indications for which it was being used, and the impact of its use on clinical care.

They identified 550 patients, 48% of whom were women, who underwent at least one FIT test. Mean age of the study cohort was 54 years. Only three of the tests, or 0.5%, were performed to screen for colorectal cancer (95% confidence interval, 0.09%-1.52%).

Among the indications documented for FIT were anemia in 242 (44.0%) patients, suspected GI bleeding in 225 (40.9%), abdominal pain in 31 (5.6%), and change in bowel habits in 19 (3.5%).

The tests were performed most often in the ED (45.3%) and on the hospital floor (42.2%), but were also performed in the ICU (10.5%) and burn unit (2.0%).

Overall, 297 of the tests, or 54%, were negative, and 253, or 46%, were positive.

“GI consults were obtained in 46.2% of the FIT-positive group, compared with 13.1% of the FIT-negative patients” (odds ratio, 5.93; 95% CI, 3.88-9.04, P < .0001), Dr. Bhatti reported.

Among FIT-positive patients, those with overt bleeding were more likely to receive a GI consultation than those without (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.9-5.5; P < .0001).

Of the 117 FIT-positive patients who underwent a GI consultation, upper endoscopy was a more common outcome than colonoscopy (51.3% vs. 23.1%; P < .0001). Of the 34 patients who underwent colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, one was diagnosed with colorectal cancer and one with advanced adenoma.

Overt GI bleeding was a better predictor of a GI consultation than a positive FIT result. In fact, use of FIT for patients with overt GI bleeding indicates a poor understanding of the test’s utility, the investigators reported.

“For patients with overt GI bleeding, having a positive FIT made no difference on how often a bleeding source was identified on endoscopy, suggesting that FIT should not be used to guide decisions about endoscopy or hospitalization,” Dr. Bhatti said.

In light of these findings, the team urges their peers to consider measures to reduce FIT tests for unnecessary indications.

“We feel that FIT is unfit for use in the inpatient and emergency settings, and measures should be taken to curb its use,” Dr. Bhatti concluded. “We presented our data to our hospital leadership and a decision was made to remove the FIT as an orderable test from the EMR.”

These results are “striking,” said Jennifer Christie, MD, from the University, Atlanta.

“We should be educating our ER providers and inpatient providers about the proper use of FIT,” she said in an interview. “Another option – and this has been done in many settings with the fecal occult blood test – is just take FIT off the units or out of the ER, so providers won’t be tempted to use it as an assessment of these patients. Because often times, as this study showed, it doesn’t really impact outcomes.”

In fact, unnecessary FI testing could put patients at risk for unnecessary procedures. “We also know that calling for an inpatient or ER consult from a gastroenterologist may increase both length of stay and costs,” she added.

Dr. Bhatti and Dr. Christie disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com.