Uptake of new heart failure drugs slow despite guidelines

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 16:40

 

SNOWMASS, COLO. – As William T. Abraham, MD, speaks to colleagues around the country about heart failure therapy, he has noticed that the first-in-class drug ivabradine remains below the radar of most physicians.

“I’ve found that this is an agent that very few people know about, even though it’s been FDA [Food and Drug Administration] approved for about 3 years. It’s used fairly extensively in Europe because that’s where the pivotal SHIFT trial was done, but not very much in the United States,” according to Dr. Abraham, professor of medicine, physiology, and cell biology and director of the division of cardiovascular medicine at Ohio State University in Columbus.

That’s likely to change as word spreads about the May 2016 update of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. The update incorporated evidence-based recommendations on the use of two important new heart failure medications: ivabradine (Corlanor), which received a moderate class IIa recommendation, meaning the drug “should be considered,” and sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto), which received the strongest class I recommendation.

In the right patients, these two oral medications improve heart failure morbidity and mortality significantly beyond what’s achievable with what has been the gold standard, guideline-directed medical therapy. Dr. Abraham described how to get started using the two medications at the Annual Cardiovascular Conference at Snowmass.

Ivabradine

Ivabradine is a selective inhibitor of the sinoatrial pacemaker modulating I(f) current. It acts by slowing the sinus rate without reducing myocardial contractility.

“This agent does one thing and one thing alone: It lowers heart rate,” the cardiologist explained.

And that, he added, was sufficient to significantly reduce the risks of death due to heart failure and recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure in the pivotal SHIFT trial.

SHIFT included 6,505 patients with moderate to severe heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and a resting heart rate above 70 bpm despite background guideline-directed medical therapy. Participants were randomized double blind to ivabradine titrated to a maximum of 7.5 mg twice daily or placebo and followed for a median of about 23 months. The rate of death due to heart failure was 3% with ivabradine and 5% with placebo, for a statistically significant 26% relative risk reduction favoring ivabradine.

But the drug’s main benefit was in reducing recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure, an endpoint of particular interest to health policy officials given that heart failure hospitalizations chew up a substantial proportion of the Medicare budget. Ivabradine reduced first hospitalizations for heart failure during the study period by 25%, second hospitalizations by 34%, and third hospitalizations by 29% (Eur Heart J. 2012 Nov;33[22]:2813-20).

The ACC/AHA guideline update stresses the importance of reserving ivabradine for heart failure patients whose resting heart rate exceeds 70 bpm, despite being on their maximum tolerated dose of a beta-blocker, Dr. Abraham noted.

Ivabradine is contraindicated in the setting of acute decompensated heart failure, severe liver disease, or hypotension, in patients on any of the numerous agents that strongly inhibit the enzyme cytochrome P450 3A4, and in those who have sick sinus syndrome, have sinoatrial block, or are pacemaker dependent.

Sacubitril/valsartan

Sacubitril inhibits neprilysin, an enzyme that blocks the action of endogenous vasoactive peptides including bradykinin, substance P, and natriuretic peptides, all of which counter important maladaptive mechanisms in heart failure. Sacubitril has been combined with the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan to form the first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, or ARNI, formerly known as LCZ696 and now marketed as Entresto.

In the pivotal double-blind PARADIGM-HF trial, 8,442 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were randomized to the ARNI at 200 mg b.i.d. or to enalapril at 10 mg b.i.d. on top of background guideline-directed medical therapy. The trial was stopped early because of evidence of overwhelming benefit: a 20% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular death and a 21% decrease in the risk of heart failure hospitalizations in the sacubitril/valsartan group, as well as significant reductions in heart failure symptoms and physical limitations (N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371[11]:993-1004).

The updated heart failure guidelines strongly recommend that patients with heart failure should be treated with either an ACE inhibitor, an angiotensin receptor blocker, or an ARNI. Further, patients who remain symptomatic on an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker should be switched to an ARNI; that’s a class Ib recommendation based upon the results of PARADIGM-HF.

In getting started using the ARNI, Dr. Abraham said it’s important to understand as background the selective nature of the PARADIGM-HF study design. During the single-blind run-in period of 5-8 weeks, roughly 10% of patients dropped out because they couldn’t tolerate enalapril at 10 mg b.i.d., and a similar percentage dropped out during the ARNI run-in. Thus, patients who couldn’t tolerate a low dose of an ACE inhibitor weren’t in the study. And patients capable of tolerating guideline-recommended full-dose ACE inhibitor therapy were not specifically sought for participation.

“So there are some unanswered questions about the ARNI. If you’re just getting started with this compound in treating your heart failure patients, my own feeling is you should maybe aim for the type of patient that was included in this trial: patients who could tolerate a moderate dose of an ACE inhibitor and had generally good blood pressure. That’s a great way to begin to get experience with this agent in heart failure,” the cardiologist advised.

He reported serving as a consultant to Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Novartis, and St. Jude Medical.

 

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

SNOWMASS, COLO. – As William T. Abraham, MD, speaks to colleagues around the country about heart failure therapy, he has noticed that the first-in-class drug ivabradine remains below the radar of most physicians.

“I’ve found that this is an agent that very few people know about, even though it’s been FDA [Food and Drug Administration] approved for about 3 years. It’s used fairly extensively in Europe because that’s where the pivotal SHIFT trial was done, but not very much in the United States,” according to Dr. Abraham, professor of medicine, physiology, and cell biology and director of the division of cardiovascular medicine at Ohio State University in Columbus.

That’s likely to change as word spreads about the May 2016 update of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. The update incorporated evidence-based recommendations on the use of two important new heart failure medications: ivabradine (Corlanor), which received a moderate class IIa recommendation, meaning the drug “should be considered,” and sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto), which received the strongest class I recommendation.

In the right patients, these two oral medications improve heart failure morbidity and mortality significantly beyond what’s achievable with what has been the gold standard, guideline-directed medical therapy. Dr. Abraham described how to get started using the two medications at the Annual Cardiovascular Conference at Snowmass.

Ivabradine

Ivabradine is a selective inhibitor of the sinoatrial pacemaker modulating I(f) current. It acts by slowing the sinus rate without reducing myocardial contractility.

“This agent does one thing and one thing alone: It lowers heart rate,” the cardiologist explained.

And that, he added, was sufficient to significantly reduce the risks of death due to heart failure and recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure in the pivotal SHIFT trial.

SHIFT included 6,505 patients with moderate to severe heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and a resting heart rate above 70 bpm despite background guideline-directed medical therapy. Participants were randomized double blind to ivabradine titrated to a maximum of 7.5 mg twice daily or placebo and followed for a median of about 23 months. The rate of death due to heart failure was 3% with ivabradine and 5% with placebo, for a statistically significant 26% relative risk reduction favoring ivabradine.

But the drug’s main benefit was in reducing recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure, an endpoint of particular interest to health policy officials given that heart failure hospitalizations chew up a substantial proportion of the Medicare budget. Ivabradine reduced first hospitalizations for heart failure during the study period by 25%, second hospitalizations by 34%, and third hospitalizations by 29% (Eur Heart J. 2012 Nov;33[22]:2813-20).

The ACC/AHA guideline update stresses the importance of reserving ivabradine for heart failure patients whose resting heart rate exceeds 70 bpm, despite being on their maximum tolerated dose of a beta-blocker, Dr. Abraham noted.

Ivabradine is contraindicated in the setting of acute decompensated heart failure, severe liver disease, or hypotension, in patients on any of the numerous agents that strongly inhibit the enzyme cytochrome P450 3A4, and in those who have sick sinus syndrome, have sinoatrial block, or are pacemaker dependent.

Sacubitril/valsartan

Sacubitril inhibits neprilysin, an enzyme that blocks the action of endogenous vasoactive peptides including bradykinin, substance P, and natriuretic peptides, all of which counter important maladaptive mechanisms in heart failure. Sacubitril has been combined with the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan to form the first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, or ARNI, formerly known as LCZ696 and now marketed as Entresto.

In the pivotal double-blind PARADIGM-HF trial, 8,442 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were randomized to the ARNI at 200 mg b.i.d. or to enalapril at 10 mg b.i.d. on top of background guideline-directed medical therapy. The trial was stopped early because of evidence of overwhelming benefit: a 20% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular death and a 21% decrease in the risk of heart failure hospitalizations in the sacubitril/valsartan group, as well as significant reductions in heart failure symptoms and physical limitations (N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371[11]:993-1004).

The updated heart failure guidelines strongly recommend that patients with heart failure should be treated with either an ACE inhibitor, an angiotensin receptor blocker, or an ARNI. Further, patients who remain symptomatic on an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker should be switched to an ARNI; that’s a class Ib recommendation based upon the results of PARADIGM-HF.

In getting started using the ARNI, Dr. Abraham said it’s important to understand as background the selective nature of the PARADIGM-HF study design. During the single-blind run-in period of 5-8 weeks, roughly 10% of patients dropped out because they couldn’t tolerate enalapril at 10 mg b.i.d., and a similar percentage dropped out during the ARNI run-in. Thus, patients who couldn’t tolerate a low dose of an ACE inhibitor weren’t in the study. And patients capable of tolerating guideline-recommended full-dose ACE inhibitor therapy were not specifically sought for participation.

“So there are some unanswered questions about the ARNI. If you’re just getting started with this compound in treating your heart failure patients, my own feeling is you should maybe aim for the type of patient that was included in this trial: patients who could tolerate a moderate dose of an ACE inhibitor and had generally good blood pressure. That’s a great way to begin to get experience with this agent in heart failure,” the cardiologist advised.

He reported serving as a consultant to Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Novartis, and St. Jude Medical.

 

 

 

SNOWMASS, COLO. – As William T. Abraham, MD, speaks to colleagues around the country about heart failure therapy, he has noticed that the first-in-class drug ivabradine remains below the radar of most physicians.

“I’ve found that this is an agent that very few people know about, even though it’s been FDA [Food and Drug Administration] approved for about 3 years. It’s used fairly extensively in Europe because that’s where the pivotal SHIFT trial was done, but not very much in the United States,” according to Dr. Abraham, professor of medicine, physiology, and cell biology and director of the division of cardiovascular medicine at Ohio State University in Columbus.

That’s likely to change as word spreads about the May 2016 update of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. The update incorporated evidence-based recommendations on the use of two important new heart failure medications: ivabradine (Corlanor), which received a moderate class IIa recommendation, meaning the drug “should be considered,” and sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto), which received the strongest class I recommendation.

In the right patients, these two oral medications improve heart failure morbidity and mortality significantly beyond what’s achievable with what has been the gold standard, guideline-directed medical therapy. Dr. Abraham described how to get started using the two medications at the Annual Cardiovascular Conference at Snowmass.

Ivabradine

Ivabradine is a selective inhibitor of the sinoatrial pacemaker modulating I(f) current. It acts by slowing the sinus rate without reducing myocardial contractility.

“This agent does one thing and one thing alone: It lowers heart rate,” the cardiologist explained.

And that, he added, was sufficient to significantly reduce the risks of death due to heart failure and recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure in the pivotal SHIFT trial.

SHIFT included 6,505 patients with moderate to severe heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and a resting heart rate above 70 bpm despite background guideline-directed medical therapy. Participants were randomized double blind to ivabradine titrated to a maximum of 7.5 mg twice daily or placebo and followed for a median of about 23 months. The rate of death due to heart failure was 3% with ivabradine and 5% with placebo, for a statistically significant 26% relative risk reduction favoring ivabradine.

But the drug’s main benefit was in reducing recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure, an endpoint of particular interest to health policy officials given that heart failure hospitalizations chew up a substantial proportion of the Medicare budget. Ivabradine reduced first hospitalizations for heart failure during the study period by 25%, second hospitalizations by 34%, and third hospitalizations by 29% (Eur Heart J. 2012 Nov;33[22]:2813-20).

The ACC/AHA guideline update stresses the importance of reserving ivabradine for heart failure patients whose resting heart rate exceeds 70 bpm, despite being on their maximum tolerated dose of a beta-blocker, Dr. Abraham noted.

Ivabradine is contraindicated in the setting of acute decompensated heart failure, severe liver disease, or hypotension, in patients on any of the numerous agents that strongly inhibit the enzyme cytochrome P450 3A4, and in those who have sick sinus syndrome, have sinoatrial block, or are pacemaker dependent.

Sacubitril/valsartan

Sacubitril inhibits neprilysin, an enzyme that blocks the action of endogenous vasoactive peptides including bradykinin, substance P, and natriuretic peptides, all of which counter important maladaptive mechanisms in heart failure. Sacubitril has been combined with the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan to form the first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, or ARNI, formerly known as LCZ696 and now marketed as Entresto.

In the pivotal double-blind PARADIGM-HF trial, 8,442 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were randomized to the ARNI at 200 mg b.i.d. or to enalapril at 10 mg b.i.d. on top of background guideline-directed medical therapy. The trial was stopped early because of evidence of overwhelming benefit: a 20% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular death and a 21% decrease in the risk of heart failure hospitalizations in the sacubitril/valsartan group, as well as significant reductions in heart failure symptoms and physical limitations (N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371[11]:993-1004).

The updated heart failure guidelines strongly recommend that patients with heart failure should be treated with either an ACE inhibitor, an angiotensin receptor blocker, or an ARNI. Further, patients who remain symptomatic on an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker should be switched to an ARNI; that’s a class Ib recommendation based upon the results of PARADIGM-HF.

In getting started using the ARNI, Dr. Abraham said it’s important to understand as background the selective nature of the PARADIGM-HF study design. During the single-blind run-in period of 5-8 weeks, roughly 10% of patients dropped out because they couldn’t tolerate enalapril at 10 mg b.i.d., and a similar percentage dropped out during the ARNI run-in. Thus, patients who couldn’t tolerate a low dose of an ACE inhibitor weren’t in the study. And patients capable of tolerating guideline-recommended full-dose ACE inhibitor therapy were not specifically sought for participation.

“So there are some unanswered questions about the ARNI. If you’re just getting started with this compound in treating your heart failure patients, my own feeling is you should maybe aim for the type of patient that was included in this trial: patients who could tolerate a moderate dose of an ACE inhibitor and had generally good blood pressure. That’s a great way to begin to get experience with this agent in heart failure,” the cardiologist advised.

He reported serving as a consultant to Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Novartis, and St. Jude Medical.

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM THE CARDIOVASCULAR CONFERENCE AT SNOWMASS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Boston - Rich History, Lively Cultural Scene

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 04/05/2017 - 10:54

There is history around every corner in Boston. This vibrant city is rich with art, music, and dance institutions, theatre and cultural attractions, distinguished dining and nightlife venues, world-class shopping and championship sports teams that attract millions of visitors each year.

 

The city’s downtown neighborhoods, each with its own personality, offer endless unique experiences, and Boston’s proximity to other must-see sites all around New England make it one of the country’s most diverse and exciting locales.Each of the city’s neighborhoods has a remarkably different style and tone. From the Back Bay’s cosmopolitan streets and ornate Victorian townhouses to the aromas spilling into the narrow and jumbled 17th-century streets of Boston’s North End to the spirited and funky neighborhood squares of Cambridge – all within easy distance from one another.Boston is “America’s Walking City.” Even though it is one of the largest cities in the country, its accessibility is unparalleled. And while sightseeing on foot is easy, Boston also has an excellent public transportation system to help you get around.

Boston is also known as the mecca of medicine. Boston is home to some of the most prestigious hospitals and medical schools, physicians, and medical scientists in the world. Thoralf M. Sundt, III, MD, and the AATS Centennial Committee have organized an engaging social program for the AATS Centennial.

Tour 1: ITALIAN GASTRONOMY NORTH END MARKET TOUR
Sunday, April 30, 2017
10:30 a.m.– 1:15 p.m.
Cost: $95 per person

Marcio Silva/Thinkstock
You will be transported to the North End to spend the afternoon with one of Boston’s greatest epicurean resources, Michele Topor. She will whisk your group away to both clandestine and conspicuous culinary landmarks, transforming guests into connoisseurs of the finest Italian fare. Heads will be spinning and bellies full, for this tour is a culinary dynamo! Ms. Topor is a certified chef, instructor, and a renowed gastronomic sage. You will visit a total of six renowned stores, including a pastry shop, coffee/spice store, green grocer, salumeria (deli), and liquor store.

 

Tour 2: A VISIT TO THE ISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM
Monday, May 1, 2017
12:15 p.m. – 2:45 p.m.
Cost: $85 per person

Victorgrigas/ Wikimedia Commons
You will travel by private motor coach to the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum. It has been reported that at the Museum’s opening on New Year’s Day 1903, Isabella Gardner served her guests champagne and doughnuts. Today, each guest will be given a small bag of freshly baked donuts along with a mini can of champagne to mirror the very first evening the museum was open.

Enjoy the Gardners’ compilation of tapestries, exquisite antique furniture, and famous collections while hearing wonderful anecdotes about Mrs. Gardner’s sophisticated and eclectic life and the famous heist. A docent will be available to guidevisitors.
 

Tour 3: BEACON HILL CIRCLE “BEHIND THE BRAHMIN DOORS”
Tuesday, May 2, 2017
9:15 a.m. – 11:45 a.m.
Cost: $110 per person

LUNAMARINA/Thinkstock
You will travel by motor coach to Beacon Hill, where you will be met by a guide for the morning tour. Enjoy exclusive access into three private homes on Beacon Hill in a 19th-century residential neighborhood north of the Boston Common and Public Gardens. Get a glimpse of the elegant living spaces behind the unassuming doors.


*Preregistration for social events and tours are required. Tours require a minimum number of participants. All tours will depart from the Hynes Convention Center.

For additional visit information and things to do in Boston, go to https://www.bostonusa.com/things-to-do.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

There is history around every corner in Boston. This vibrant city is rich with art, music, and dance institutions, theatre and cultural attractions, distinguished dining and nightlife venues, world-class shopping and championship sports teams that attract millions of visitors each year.

 

The city’s downtown neighborhoods, each with its own personality, offer endless unique experiences, and Boston’s proximity to other must-see sites all around New England make it one of the country’s most diverse and exciting locales.Each of the city’s neighborhoods has a remarkably different style and tone. From the Back Bay’s cosmopolitan streets and ornate Victorian townhouses to the aromas spilling into the narrow and jumbled 17th-century streets of Boston’s North End to the spirited and funky neighborhood squares of Cambridge – all within easy distance from one another.Boston is “America’s Walking City.” Even though it is one of the largest cities in the country, its accessibility is unparalleled. And while sightseeing on foot is easy, Boston also has an excellent public transportation system to help you get around.

Boston is also known as the mecca of medicine. Boston is home to some of the most prestigious hospitals and medical schools, physicians, and medical scientists in the world. Thoralf M. Sundt, III, MD, and the AATS Centennial Committee have organized an engaging social program for the AATS Centennial.

Tour 1: ITALIAN GASTRONOMY NORTH END MARKET TOUR
Sunday, April 30, 2017
10:30 a.m.– 1:15 p.m.
Cost: $95 per person

Marcio Silva/Thinkstock
You will be transported to the North End to spend the afternoon with one of Boston’s greatest epicurean resources, Michele Topor. She will whisk your group away to both clandestine and conspicuous culinary landmarks, transforming guests into connoisseurs of the finest Italian fare. Heads will be spinning and bellies full, for this tour is a culinary dynamo! Ms. Topor is a certified chef, instructor, and a renowed gastronomic sage. You will visit a total of six renowned stores, including a pastry shop, coffee/spice store, green grocer, salumeria (deli), and liquor store.

 

Tour 2: A VISIT TO THE ISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM
Monday, May 1, 2017
12:15 p.m. – 2:45 p.m.
Cost: $85 per person

Victorgrigas/ Wikimedia Commons
You will travel by private motor coach to the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum. It has been reported that at the Museum’s opening on New Year’s Day 1903, Isabella Gardner served her guests champagne and doughnuts. Today, each guest will be given a small bag of freshly baked donuts along with a mini can of champagne to mirror the very first evening the museum was open.

Enjoy the Gardners’ compilation of tapestries, exquisite antique furniture, and famous collections while hearing wonderful anecdotes about Mrs. Gardner’s sophisticated and eclectic life and the famous heist. A docent will be available to guidevisitors.
 

Tour 3: BEACON HILL CIRCLE “BEHIND THE BRAHMIN DOORS”
Tuesday, May 2, 2017
9:15 a.m. – 11:45 a.m.
Cost: $110 per person

LUNAMARINA/Thinkstock
You will travel by motor coach to Beacon Hill, where you will be met by a guide for the morning tour. Enjoy exclusive access into three private homes on Beacon Hill in a 19th-century residential neighborhood north of the Boston Common and Public Gardens. Get a glimpse of the elegant living spaces behind the unassuming doors.


*Preregistration for social events and tours are required. Tours require a minimum number of participants. All tours will depart from the Hynes Convention Center.

For additional visit information and things to do in Boston, go to https://www.bostonusa.com/things-to-do.

There is history around every corner in Boston. This vibrant city is rich with art, music, and dance institutions, theatre and cultural attractions, distinguished dining and nightlife venues, world-class shopping and championship sports teams that attract millions of visitors each year.

 

The city’s downtown neighborhoods, each with its own personality, offer endless unique experiences, and Boston’s proximity to other must-see sites all around New England make it one of the country’s most diverse and exciting locales.Each of the city’s neighborhoods has a remarkably different style and tone. From the Back Bay’s cosmopolitan streets and ornate Victorian townhouses to the aromas spilling into the narrow and jumbled 17th-century streets of Boston’s North End to the spirited and funky neighborhood squares of Cambridge – all within easy distance from one another.Boston is “America’s Walking City.” Even though it is one of the largest cities in the country, its accessibility is unparalleled. And while sightseeing on foot is easy, Boston also has an excellent public transportation system to help you get around.

Boston is also known as the mecca of medicine. Boston is home to some of the most prestigious hospitals and medical schools, physicians, and medical scientists in the world. Thoralf M. Sundt, III, MD, and the AATS Centennial Committee have organized an engaging social program for the AATS Centennial.

Tour 1: ITALIAN GASTRONOMY NORTH END MARKET TOUR
Sunday, April 30, 2017
10:30 a.m.– 1:15 p.m.
Cost: $95 per person

Marcio Silva/Thinkstock
You will be transported to the North End to spend the afternoon with one of Boston’s greatest epicurean resources, Michele Topor. She will whisk your group away to both clandestine and conspicuous culinary landmarks, transforming guests into connoisseurs of the finest Italian fare. Heads will be spinning and bellies full, for this tour is a culinary dynamo! Ms. Topor is a certified chef, instructor, and a renowed gastronomic sage. You will visit a total of six renowned stores, including a pastry shop, coffee/spice store, green grocer, salumeria (deli), and liquor store.

 

Tour 2: A VISIT TO THE ISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM
Monday, May 1, 2017
12:15 p.m. – 2:45 p.m.
Cost: $85 per person

Victorgrigas/ Wikimedia Commons
You will travel by private motor coach to the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum. It has been reported that at the Museum’s opening on New Year’s Day 1903, Isabella Gardner served her guests champagne and doughnuts. Today, each guest will be given a small bag of freshly baked donuts along with a mini can of champagne to mirror the very first evening the museum was open.

Enjoy the Gardners’ compilation of tapestries, exquisite antique furniture, and famous collections while hearing wonderful anecdotes about Mrs. Gardner’s sophisticated and eclectic life and the famous heist. A docent will be available to guidevisitors.
 

Tour 3: BEACON HILL CIRCLE “BEHIND THE BRAHMIN DOORS”
Tuesday, May 2, 2017
9:15 a.m. – 11:45 a.m.
Cost: $110 per person

LUNAMARINA/Thinkstock
You will travel by motor coach to Beacon Hill, where you will be met by a guide for the morning tour. Enjoy exclusive access into three private homes on Beacon Hill in a 19th-century residential neighborhood north of the Boston Common and Public Gardens. Get a glimpse of the elegant living spaces behind the unassuming doors.


*Preregistration for social events and tours are required. Tours require a minimum number of participants. All tours will depart from the Hynes Convention Center.

For additional visit information and things to do in Boston, go to https://www.bostonusa.com/things-to-do.

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Off-the-shelf T cells an option for post-HCT viral infections

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 10:02

 

ORLANDO– Infusions of banked multivirus-specific T lymphocytes were associated with complete or partial responses in 93% of 42 patients who had undergone hematopoietic cell transplants and had drug-refractory viral illnesses. Further, these patients experienced minimal new or reactivated graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

Viral infections cause nearly 40% of deaths after alternative donor hematopoietic cell transfer (HCT), Ifigeneia Tzannou, MD, said at the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Banked, “off-the-shelf” donor virus-resistant T cells can be an alternative to antiviral drugs, which are far from universally effective and may have serious side effects.

Kari Oakes/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Ifigeneia Tzannou


“Traditionally, we have generated T cells for infusion from the stem cell donor” by isolating and then stimulating and expanding the peripheral blood mononuclear cells for about 10 days ex vivo, said Dr. Tzannou. At that point, the clonal multivirus-resistant T cells can then be transferred to the recipient.

Donor-derived T cells have been used to prevent and treat Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), adenovirus (AdV), BK virus (BKV), and human herpes virus 6 (HHV6) infections. The approach has been safe, reconstituting antiviral immunity and clearing disease effectively, with a 94% response rate reported in one recent study. However, said Dr. Tzannou, donor-derived virus-specific T cells (VSTs) have their limitations. Donors are increasingly younger and cord blood is being used more commonly, so there are growing numbers of donors who are seronegative for pathogenic viruses. In addition, the 10 days of production time and the additional week or 10 days required for release means that donor-derived VSTs can’t be urgently used.

The concept of banked third party VST therapy came about to address those limitations, said Dr. Tzannou of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.

In a banked VST scenario, donor T cells with specific multiviral immunity are human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typed, expanded, and cryopreserved. A post-HCT patient with drug-refractory viral illness can receive T cells that are partially matched at HLA –A, HLA-B, or HLA-DR. Dr. Tzannou said that her group has now generated a bank of 59 VST lines to use in clinical testing of the third party approach.

In the study, Dr. Tzannou and her colleagues included both pediatric and adult post-allo-HCT patients with refractory EBV, CMV, AdV, BKV, and/or HHV6 infections. All had either failed a 14-day trial of antiviral therapy or could not tolerate antivirals. Patients could not be on more than 0.5 mg/kg per day of prednisone; they had to have an absolute neutrophil count above 500 per microliter and hemoglobin greater than 8 g/dL. Patients were excluded if they had acute GVHD of grade 2 or higher. There had to be a compatible VST line available that matched both the patient’s illness and HLA typing.

Patients initially received 20,000,000 VST cells per square meter of body surface area. If the investigators saw a partial response, patients could receive additional VST doses every 2 weeks.

Of the 42 patients infused, 23 received one infusion and 19 required two or more infusions. Seven study participants had two viral infections; 18 had CMV, 2 had EBV, 9 had AdV, 17 had BKV, and 3 had HHV6.

Dr. Tzannou and her colleagues tracked the virus-specific T cells and viral load for particular viruses. Virus-specific peripheral T cell counts also rose measurably and viral load plummeted within 2 weeks of VST infusions for most patients.

Overall, 93% of patients met the primary outcome measure of achieving complete or partial response; a partial response was defined as a 50% or better decrease in the viral load and/or clinical improvement.

All of the 17 BKV patients treated to date had tissue disease; 15 had hemorrhagic cystitis and 2 had nephritis. All responded to VSTs, and all of those with hemorrhagic cystitis had symptomatic improvement or resolution.

Overall, the safety profile for VST was good, said Dr. Tzannou. Four patients developed grade 1 acute cutaneous GVHD within 45 days of infusion; one of these developed de novo, but resolved with topical steroids. Another patient had a flare of gastrointestinal GVHD when immunosuppresion was being tapered. One more patient had a transient fever post infusion that resolved spontaneously, said Dr. Tzannou.

Next steps include a multicenter registration study, said Dr. Tzannou, who reports being a consultant for ViraCyte, which helped fund the study.
 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

ORLANDO– Infusions of banked multivirus-specific T lymphocytes were associated with complete or partial responses in 93% of 42 patients who had undergone hematopoietic cell transplants and had drug-refractory viral illnesses. Further, these patients experienced minimal new or reactivated graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

Viral infections cause nearly 40% of deaths after alternative donor hematopoietic cell transfer (HCT), Ifigeneia Tzannou, MD, said at the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Banked, “off-the-shelf” donor virus-resistant T cells can be an alternative to antiviral drugs, which are far from universally effective and may have serious side effects.

Kari Oakes/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Ifigeneia Tzannou


“Traditionally, we have generated T cells for infusion from the stem cell donor” by isolating and then stimulating and expanding the peripheral blood mononuclear cells for about 10 days ex vivo, said Dr. Tzannou. At that point, the clonal multivirus-resistant T cells can then be transferred to the recipient.

Donor-derived T cells have been used to prevent and treat Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), adenovirus (AdV), BK virus (BKV), and human herpes virus 6 (HHV6) infections. The approach has been safe, reconstituting antiviral immunity and clearing disease effectively, with a 94% response rate reported in one recent study. However, said Dr. Tzannou, donor-derived virus-specific T cells (VSTs) have their limitations. Donors are increasingly younger and cord blood is being used more commonly, so there are growing numbers of donors who are seronegative for pathogenic viruses. In addition, the 10 days of production time and the additional week or 10 days required for release means that donor-derived VSTs can’t be urgently used.

The concept of banked third party VST therapy came about to address those limitations, said Dr. Tzannou of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.

In a banked VST scenario, donor T cells with specific multiviral immunity are human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typed, expanded, and cryopreserved. A post-HCT patient with drug-refractory viral illness can receive T cells that are partially matched at HLA –A, HLA-B, or HLA-DR. Dr. Tzannou said that her group has now generated a bank of 59 VST lines to use in clinical testing of the third party approach.

In the study, Dr. Tzannou and her colleagues included both pediatric and adult post-allo-HCT patients with refractory EBV, CMV, AdV, BKV, and/or HHV6 infections. All had either failed a 14-day trial of antiviral therapy or could not tolerate antivirals. Patients could not be on more than 0.5 mg/kg per day of prednisone; they had to have an absolute neutrophil count above 500 per microliter and hemoglobin greater than 8 g/dL. Patients were excluded if they had acute GVHD of grade 2 or higher. There had to be a compatible VST line available that matched both the patient’s illness and HLA typing.

Patients initially received 20,000,000 VST cells per square meter of body surface area. If the investigators saw a partial response, patients could receive additional VST doses every 2 weeks.

Of the 42 patients infused, 23 received one infusion and 19 required two or more infusions. Seven study participants had two viral infections; 18 had CMV, 2 had EBV, 9 had AdV, 17 had BKV, and 3 had HHV6.

Dr. Tzannou and her colleagues tracked the virus-specific T cells and viral load for particular viruses. Virus-specific peripheral T cell counts also rose measurably and viral load plummeted within 2 weeks of VST infusions for most patients.

Overall, 93% of patients met the primary outcome measure of achieving complete or partial response; a partial response was defined as a 50% or better decrease in the viral load and/or clinical improvement.

All of the 17 BKV patients treated to date had tissue disease; 15 had hemorrhagic cystitis and 2 had nephritis. All responded to VSTs, and all of those with hemorrhagic cystitis had symptomatic improvement or resolution.

Overall, the safety profile for VST was good, said Dr. Tzannou. Four patients developed grade 1 acute cutaneous GVHD within 45 days of infusion; one of these developed de novo, but resolved with topical steroids. Another patient had a flare of gastrointestinal GVHD when immunosuppresion was being tapered. One more patient had a transient fever post infusion that resolved spontaneously, said Dr. Tzannou.

Next steps include a multicenter registration study, said Dr. Tzannou, who reports being a consultant for ViraCyte, which helped fund the study.
 

 

ORLANDO– Infusions of banked multivirus-specific T lymphocytes were associated with complete or partial responses in 93% of 42 patients who had undergone hematopoietic cell transplants and had drug-refractory viral illnesses. Further, these patients experienced minimal new or reactivated graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

Viral infections cause nearly 40% of deaths after alternative donor hematopoietic cell transfer (HCT), Ifigeneia Tzannou, MD, said at the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Banked, “off-the-shelf” donor virus-resistant T cells can be an alternative to antiviral drugs, which are far from universally effective and may have serious side effects.

Kari Oakes/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Ifigeneia Tzannou


“Traditionally, we have generated T cells for infusion from the stem cell donor” by isolating and then stimulating and expanding the peripheral blood mononuclear cells for about 10 days ex vivo, said Dr. Tzannou. At that point, the clonal multivirus-resistant T cells can then be transferred to the recipient.

Donor-derived T cells have been used to prevent and treat Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), adenovirus (AdV), BK virus (BKV), and human herpes virus 6 (HHV6) infections. The approach has been safe, reconstituting antiviral immunity and clearing disease effectively, with a 94% response rate reported in one recent study. However, said Dr. Tzannou, donor-derived virus-specific T cells (VSTs) have their limitations. Donors are increasingly younger and cord blood is being used more commonly, so there are growing numbers of donors who are seronegative for pathogenic viruses. In addition, the 10 days of production time and the additional week or 10 days required for release means that donor-derived VSTs can’t be urgently used.

The concept of banked third party VST therapy came about to address those limitations, said Dr. Tzannou of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.

In a banked VST scenario, donor T cells with specific multiviral immunity are human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typed, expanded, and cryopreserved. A post-HCT patient with drug-refractory viral illness can receive T cells that are partially matched at HLA –A, HLA-B, or HLA-DR. Dr. Tzannou said that her group has now generated a bank of 59 VST lines to use in clinical testing of the third party approach.

In the study, Dr. Tzannou and her colleagues included both pediatric and adult post-allo-HCT patients with refractory EBV, CMV, AdV, BKV, and/or HHV6 infections. All had either failed a 14-day trial of antiviral therapy or could not tolerate antivirals. Patients could not be on more than 0.5 mg/kg per day of prednisone; they had to have an absolute neutrophil count above 500 per microliter and hemoglobin greater than 8 g/dL. Patients were excluded if they had acute GVHD of grade 2 or higher. There had to be a compatible VST line available that matched both the patient’s illness and HLA typing.

Patients initially received 20,000,000 VST cells per square meter of body surface area. If the investigators saw a partial response, patients could receive additional VST doses every 2 weeks.

Of the 42 patients infused, 23 received one infusion and 19 required two or more infusions. Seven study participants had two viral infections; 18 had CMV, 2 had EBV, 9 had AdV, 17 had BKV, and 3 had HHV6.

Dr. Tzannou and her colleagues tracked the virus-specific T cells and viral load for particular viruses. Virus-specific peripheral T cell counts also rose measurably and viral load plummeted within 2 weeks of VST infusions for most patients.

Overall, 93% of patients met the primary outcome measure of achieving complete or partial response; a partial response was defined as a 50% or better decrease in the viral load and/or clinical improvement.

All of the 17 BKV patients treated to date had tissue disease; 15 had hemorrhagic cystitis and 2 had nephritis. All responded to VSTs, and all of those with hemorrhagic cystitis had symptomatic improvement or resolution.

Overall, the safety profile for VST was good, said Dr. Tzannou. Four patients developed grade 1 acute cutaneous GVHD within 45 days of infusion; one of these developed de novo, but resolved with topical steroids. Another patient had a flare of gastrointestinal GVHD when immunosuppresion was being tapered. One more patient had a transient fever post infusion that resolved spontaneously, said Dr. Tzannou.

Next steps include a multicenter registration study, said Dr. Tzannou, who reports being a consultant for ViraCyte, which helped fund the study.
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT THE 2017 BMT TANDEM MEETINGS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Banked donor T cell infusions might prove an alternative to donor-derived virus-specific T cells for patients who have drug-refractory viral illnesses after hematopoietic cell transplant.

Major finding: With banked multivirus-specific T cells, viral illnesses either improved or resolved in 93% of 42 patients.

Data source: Clinical trial of 42 postallogeneic hematopoietic cell transfer patients who had any of five viral illnesses and had either failed a 14-day trial of antiviral therapy or could not tolerate antivirals.

Disclosures: Dr. Tzannou is a consultant for Incyte, which partially funded the trial and is developing third-party VSTs.

Pruritic Rash on the Buttock

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 01/10/2019 - 13:40
Display Headline
Pruritic Rash on the Buttock

Cutaneous Larva Migrans 

Cutaneous larva migrans (CLM) is caused by the larval migration of animal hookworms. Ancylostoma braziliense, Ancylostoma ceylanicum, and Ancylostoma caninum are the species most commonly associated with the disease. The hookworm is endemic to tropical and subtropical climates in areas such as Africa, Southeast Asia, South America, and the southeastern United States.1 Although cats and dogs are most commonly affected, humans can be infected if they are exposed to sand or soil containing hookworm larvae, often due to contamination from animal feces.2 Cutaneous larva migrans is characterized by pruritic erythematous papules and linear or serpiginous, reddish brown, elevated tracks most commonly appearing on the feet, buttocks, thighs, and lower legs; however, lesions can appear anywhere. In human hosts, the larvae travel in the epidermis and are unable to invade the dermis; it is speculated that they lack the collagenase enzymes required to penetrate the basement membrane before invading the dermis.2 

On histopathology, there typically are small cavities in the epidermis corresponding to the track of the larvae.3 There often is a spongiotic dermatitis with a mixed inflammatory infiltrate following the larvae with scattered eosinophils. The migrating larvae may be up to 1 mm in size and have bilateral double alae, or winglike projections, on the side of the body (Figure 1).4 The larvae are difficult to find on histopathology because they often travel beyond the areas that demonstrate clinical findings. The diagnosis of CLM is mostly clinical, but if a biopsy is performed, the specimen should be taken ahead of the track. 

Figure 1. Cutaneous larva migrans with Ancylostoma larvae with bilateral double alae, or winglike projections (arrows) on the side of the body (H&E, original magnification ×40).

Disseminated strongyloidiasis is caused by Strongyloides stercoralis. When filariform larvae migrate out of the intestinal tract into the skin, they can cause an urticarial rash and serpiginous patterns on the skin that can move 5 to 15 cm per hour, a clinical condition known as larva currens. In immunocompromised individuals, there can be hyperinfection with diffuse petechial thumbprint purpura seen clinically, which characteristically radiate from the periumbilical area.1 On pathology, there may be numerous larvae found between the dermal collagen bundles, measuring 9 to 15 µm in diameter. Rarely, they also can be found in small blood vessels.3 They often are accompanied by extravasated red blood cells in the tissues (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Disseminated strongyloidiasis with Strongyloides larvae migrating between collagen bundles in the dermis with extravasated red blood cells (arrow)(H&E, original magnification ×20).

Myiasis represents the largest pathogen in the differential diagnosis for CLM. In myiasis, fly larvae will infest human tissue, usually by forming a small cavity in the dermis or subcutaneous tissue. The larvae are visible to the human eye and can be up to several centimeters in length. In the skin, the histology of myiasis usually is accompanied by a heavy mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate with many eosinophils. Fragments of the larvae are seen encased by a thick chitinous cuticle with widely spaced spines or pigmented setae (Figure 3) on the surface of the cuticle.5 Layers of striated muscle and internal organs may be seen beneath the cuticle.3

Figure 3. Myiasis larva in a patient with setae (arrows) on the surface of the cuticle (H&E, original magnification ×2).

Onchocerciasis, or river blindness, is a parasitic disease caused by Onchocerca volvulus that is most often seen in sub-Saharan Africa. It may cause the skin finding of an onchocercoma, a subcutaneous nodule made up of Onchocerca nematodes. However, when the filaria disseminate, it may cause onchocerciasis with cutaneous findings of an eczematous dermatitis with itching and lichenification.1 In onchocercal dermatitis, microfilariae may be found in the dermis and there may be a mild dermal chronic inflammatory infiltrate with eosinophils.3 These microfilariae are smaller than Strongyloides larvae (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Onchocerciasis microfilaria (arrow) between collagen bundles (H&E, original magnification ×40).

Sarcoptes scabiei are mites that are pathologically found limited to the stratum corneum. There often is a spongiotic dermatitis as the mite travels with an accompanying mixed cell inflammatory infiltrate with many eosinophils. One or more mites may be seen with or without eggs and excreta or scybala (Figure 5). Pink pigtails may be seen connected to the stratum corneum, representing egg fragments or casings left behind after the mite hatches.3 The female mite measures up to 0.4 mm in length.3

Figure 5. Scabies with pigtails connected to the stratum corneum, representing egg fragments or casing left behind after the mite hatches (H&E, original magnification ×20).

References
  1. Lupi O, Downing C, Lee M, et al. Mucocutaneous manifestations of helminth infections. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73:929-944.
  2. James WD, Berger T, Elston D. Andrews' Diseases of the Skin: Clinical Dermatology. 12th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2016.
  3. Patterson J. Weedon's Skin Pathology. 4th ed. London, England: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2016.
  4. Milner D. Diagnostic Pathology: Infectious Diseases. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2015.
  5. Ferringer T, Peckham S, Ko CJ, et al. Dermatopathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2013.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Mr. Osswald is from the College of Science, University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Gilson is from UT Health San Antonio Cancer Therapy & Research Center, Texas.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Robert T. Gilson, MD, UT Health San Antonio Cancer Therapy & Research Center, 7979 Wurzbach Rd, San Antonio, TX 78229-4427 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 99(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
232, 262, 264
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Mr. Osswald is from the College of Science, University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Gilson is from UT Health San Antonio Cancer Therapy & Research Center, Texas.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Robert T. Gilson, MD, UT Health San Antonio Cancer Therapy & Research Center, 7979 Wurzbach Rd, San Antonio, TX 78229-4427 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Mr. Osswald is from the College of Science, University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Gilson is from UT Health San Antonio Cancer Therapy & Research Center, Texas.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Robert T. Gilson, MD, UT Health San Antonio Cancer Therapy & Research Center, 7979 Wurzbach Rd, San Antonio, TX 78229-4427 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Cutaneous Larva Migrans 

Cutaneous larva migrans (CLM) is caused by the larval migration of animal hookworms. Ancylostoma braziliense, Ancylostoma ceylanicum, and Ancylostoma caninum are the species most commonly associated with the disease. The hookworm is endemic to tropical and subtropical climates in areas such as Africa, Southeast Asia, South America, and the southeastern United States.1 Although cats and dogs are most commonly affected, humans can be infected if they are exposed to sand or soil containing hookworm larvae, often due to contamination from animal feces.2 Cutaneous larva migrans is characterized by pruritic erythematous papules and linear or serpiginous, reddish brown, elevated tracks most commonly appearing on the feet, buttocks, thighs, and lower legs; however, lesions can appear anywhere. In human hosts, the larvae travel in the epidermis and are unable to invade the dermis; it is speculated that they lack the collagenase enzymes required to penetrate the basement membrane before invading the dermis.2 

On histopathology, there typically are small cavities in the epidermis corresponding to the track of the larvae.3 There often is a spongiotic dermatitis with a mixed inflammatory infiltrate following the larvae with scattered eosinophils. The migrating larvae may be up to 1 mm in size and have bilateral double alae, or winglike projections, on the side of the body (Figure 1).4 The larvae are difficult to find on histopathology because they often travel beyond the areas that demonstrate clinical findings. The diagnosis of CLM is mostly clinical, but if a biopsy is performed, the specimen should be taken ahead of the track. 

Figure 1. Cutaneous larva migrans with Ancylostoma larvae with bilateral double alae, or winglike projections (arrows) on the side of the body (H&E, original magnification ×40).

Disseminated strongyloidiasis is caused by Strongyloides stercoralis. When filariform larvae migrate out of the intestinal tract into the skin, they can cause an urticarial rash and serpiginous patterns on the skin that can move 5 to 15 cm per hour, a clinical condition known as larva currens. In immunocompromised individuals, there can be hyperinfection with diffuse petechial thumbprint purpura seen clinically, which characteristically radiate from the periumbilical area.1 On pathology, there may be numerous larvae found between the dermal collagen bundles, measuring 9 to 15 µm in diameter. Rarely, they also can be found in small blood vessels.3 They often are accompanied by extravasated red blood cells in the tissues (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Disseminated strongyloidiasis with Strongyloides larvae migrating between collagen bundles in the dermis with extravasated red blood cells (arrow)(H&E, original magnification ×20).

Myiasis represents the largest pathogen in the differential diagnosis for CLM. In myiasis, fly larvae will infest human tissue, usually by forming a small cavity in the dermis or subcutaneous tissue. The larvae are visible to the human eye and can be up to several centimeters in length. In the skin, the histology of myiasis usually is accompanied by a heavy mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate with many eosinophils. Fragments of the larvae are seen encased by a thick chitinous cuticle with widely spaced spines or pigmented setae (Figure 3) on the surface of the cuticle.5 Layers of striated muscle and internal organs may be seen beneath the cuticle.3

Figure 3. Myiasis larva in a patient with setae (arrows) on the surface of the cuticle (H&E, original magnification ×2).

Onchocerciasis, or river blindness, is a parasitic disease caused by Onchocerca volvulus that is most often seen in sub-Saharan Africa. It may cause the skin finding of an onchocercoma, a subcutaneous nodule made up of Onchocerca nematodes. However, when the filaria disseminate, it may cause onchocerciasis with cutaneous findings of an eczematous dermatitis with itching and lichenification.1 In onchocercal dermatitis, microfilariae may be found in the dermis and there may be a mild dermal chronic inflammatory infiltrate with eosinophils.3 These microfilariae are smaller than Strongyloides larvae (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Onchocerciasis microfilaria (arrow) between collagen bundles (H&E, original magnification ×40).

Sarcoptes scabiei are mites that are pathologically found limited to the stratum corneum. There often is a spongiotic dermatitis as the mite travels with an accompanying mixed cell inflammatory infiltrate with many eosinophils. One or more mites may be seen with or without eggs and excreta or scybala (Figure 5). Pink pigtails may be seen connected to the stratum corneum, representing egg fragments or casings left behind after the mite hatches.3 The female mite measures up to 0.4 mm in length.3

Figure 5. Scabies with pigtails connected to the stratum corneum, representing egg fragments or casing left behind after the mite hatches (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Cutaneous Larva Migrans 

Cutaneous larva migrans (CLM) is caused by the larval migration of animal hookworms. Ancylostoma braziliense, Ancylostoma ceylanicum, and Ancylostoma caninum are the species most commonly associated with the disease. The hookworm is endemic to tropical and subtropical climates in areas such as Africa, Southeast Asia, South America, and the southeastern United States.1 Although cats and dogs are most commonly affected, humans can be infected if they are exposed to sand or soil containing hookworm larvae, often due to contamination from animal feces.2 Cutaneous larva migrans is characterized by pruritic erythematous papules and linear or serpiginous, reddish brown, elevated tracks most commonly appearing on the feet, buttocks, thighs, and lower legs; however, lesions can appear anywhere. In human hosts, the larvae travel in the epidermis and are unable to invade the dermis; it is speculated that they lack the collagenase enzymes required to penetrate the basement membrane before invading the dermis.2 

On histopathology, there typically are small cavities in the epidermis corresponding to the track of the larvae.3 There often is a spongiotic dermatitis with a mixed inflammatory infiltrate following the larvae with scattered eosinophils. The migrating larvae may be up to 1 mm in size and have bilateral double alae, or winglike projections, on the side of the body (Figure 1).4 The larvae are difficult to find on histopathology because they often travel beyond the areas that demonstrate clinical findings. The diagnosis of CLM is mostly clinical, but if a biopsy is performed, the specimen should be taken ahead of the track. 

Figure 1. Cutaneous larva migrans with Ancylostoma larvae with bilateral double alae, or winglike projections (arrows) on the side of the body (H&E, original magnification ×40).

Disseminated strongyloidiasis is caused by Strongyloides stercoralis. When filariform larvae migrate out of the intestinal tract into the skin, they can cause an urticarial rash and serpiginous patterns on the skin that can move 5 to 15 cm per hour, a clinical condition known as larva currens. In immunocompromised individuals, there can be hyperinfection with diffuse petechial thumbprint purpura seen clinically, which characteristically radiate from the periumbilical area.1 On pathology, there may be numerous larvae found between the dermal collagen bundles, measuring 9 to 15 µm in diameter. Rarely, they also can be found in small blood vessels.3 They often are accompanied by extravasated red blood cells in the tissues (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Disseminated strongyloidiasis with Strongyloides larvae migrating between collagen bundles in the dermis with extravasated red blood cells (arrow)(H&E, original magnification ×20).

Myiasis represents the largest pathogen in the differential diagnosis for CLM. In myiasis, fly larvae will infest human tissue, usually by forming a small cavity in the dermis or subcutaneous tissue. The larvae are visible to the human eye and can be up to several centimeters in length. In the skin, the histology of myiasis usually is accompanied by a heavy mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate with many eosinophils. Fragments of the larvae are seen encased by a thick chitinous cuticle with widely spaced spines or pigmented setae (Figure 3) on the surface of the cuticle.5 Layers of striated muscle and internal organs may be seen beneath the cuticle.3

Figure 3. Myiasis larva in a patient with setae (arrows) on the surface of the cuticle (H&E, original magnification ×2).

Onchocerciasis, or river blindness, is a parasitic disease caused by Onchocerca volvulus that is most often seen in sub-Saharan Africa. It may cause the skin finding of an onchocercoma, a subcutaneous nodule made up of Onchocerca nematodes. However, when the filaria disseminate, it may cause onchocerciasis with cutaneous findings of an eczematous dermatitis with itching and lichenification.1 In onchocercal dermatitis, microfilariae may be found in the dermis and there may be a mild dermal chronic inflammatory infiltrate with eosinophils.3 These microfilariae are smaller than Strongyloides larvae (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Onchocerciasis microfilaria (arrow) between collagen bundles (H&E, original magnification ×40).

Sarcoptes scabiei are mites that are pathologically found limited to the stratum corneum. There often is a spongiotic dermatitis as the mite travels with an accompanying mixed cell inflammatory infiltrate with many eosinophils. One or more mites may be seen with or without eggs and excreta or scybala (Figure 5). Pink pigtails may be seen connected to the stratum corneum, representing egg fragments or casings left behind after the mite hatches.3 The female mite measures up to 0.4 mm in length.3

Figure 5. Scabies with pigtails connected to the stratum corneum, representing egg fragments or casing left behind after the mite hatches (H&E, original magnification ×20).

References
  1. Lupi O, Downing C, Lee M, et al. Mucocutaneous manifestations of helminth infections. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73:929-944.
  2. James WD, Berger T, Elston D. Andrews' Diseases of the Skin: Clinical Dermatology. 12th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2016.
  3. Patterson J. Weedon's Skin Pathology. 4th ed. London, England: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2016.
  4. Milner D. Diagnostic Pathology: Infectious Diseases. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2015.
  5. Ferringer T, Peckham S, Ko CJ, et al. Dermatopathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2013.
References
  1. Lupi O, Downing C, Lee M, et al. Mucocutaneous manifestations of helminth infections. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73:929-944.
  2. James WD, Berger T, Elston D. Andrews' Diseases of the Skin: Clinical Dermatology. 12th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2016.
  3. Patterson J. Weedon's Skin Pathology. 4th ed. London, England: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2016.
  4. Milner D. Diagnostic Pathology: Infectious Diseases. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2015.
  5. Ferringer T, Peckham S, Ko CJ, et al. Dermatopathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2013.
Issue
Cutis - 99(4)
Issue
Cutis - 99(4)
Page Number
232, 262, 264
Page Number
232, 262, 264
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Pruritic Rash on the Buttock
Display Headline
Pruritic Rash on the Buttock
Sections
Questionnaire Body

H&E, original magnification ×10.

An 18-year-old man presented with a several-week history of an expanding pruritic serpiginous and linear eruption on the buttock. The patient recently had spent some time vacationing at the beach in the southeastern United States. Physical examination revealed erythematous linear papules and serpiginous raised tracks on the buttock. A biopsy of the lesion was performed.
 
 

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Large Hyperpigmented Plaques on the Trunk of a Newborn

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 01/10/2019 - 13:40
Display Headline
Large Hyperpigmented Plaques on the Trunk of a Newborn

The Diagnosis: Cutaneous Mastocytoma

Physical examination revealed a 58×51-mm hyperpigmented plaque with central pink coloration and scale on the right side of the back as well as a 39×33-mm pink plaque with a hyperpigmented border on the left side of the flank (Figure 1). At follow-up 2 weeks later, the patient's parents reported that blisters formed within both of the plaques. The blisters ruptured a few hours after forming and drained clear fluid with scant blood. Both plaques contained erosions from the ruptured bullae but remained the same size with no surrounding erythema or warmth. A 4-mm punch biopsy was performed of intact skin from the back lesion (Figure 2A). Histologic examination revealed a cellular infiltrate of monotonous bland cells that completely filled the dermis without epidermal involvement, along with occasional intermixed eosinophils. The morphology of these infiltrating cells was compatible with mast cells confirmed by strongly positive Leder staining (Figure 2B).

Figure 1. Cutaneous mastocytoma. Lesion on the left side of the flank 1 month after birth during a follow-up visit.

Figure 2. A 4-mm punch biopsy of the lesion on the right side of the back revealed an infiltrate of monotonous bland cells that filled the dermis with occasional eosinophils (A)(H&E, original magnification ×10). Leder stain of the biopsy specimen was strongly positive for mast cell infiltrate (B)(original magnification ×20).

Mastocytosis encompasses a rare group of disorders characterized by abnormal mast cell accumulation or mast cell mediator release in various tissues. These disorders can be classified as either systemic mastocytosis with mast cell infiltration into bone marrow or other extracutaneous organs, or cutaneous mastocytosis with disease limited to the skin.1 Mutations involving activation of the c-Kit receptor in stimulating mast cell growth and development have been implicated in both systemic and cutaneous forms of the disease.2,3

Cutaneous mastocytosis is most often diagnosed in childhood and typically is characterized by spontaneous regression before puberty in a majority of cases.1,4 Under the World Health Organization classification system, cutaneous mastocytosis can be further subdivided into 3 disorders (listed in order of most to least common): urticaria pigmentosa (also known as maculopapular cutaneous mastocytosis) with typical, plaque, and nodular forms; cutaneous mastocytoma (as seen in this patient); and diffuse cutaneous mastocytosis.5 Compared to the widespread distribution of small macules and papules in urticaria pigmentosa, the cutaneous mastocytoma subtype presents with 1 to 6 brown to orange-yellow plaques or nodules measuring more than 1 cm in diameter. Cutaneous mastocytoma typically presents in infancy and is located most commonly on the trunk and extremities, though it may be found on the face or scalp. The plaques of mastocytoma often have well-defined margins, and these lesions may become bullous or demonstrate Darier sign of urtication and erythema on physical stimulation. Patients most commonly experience pruritus from mast cell degranulation and rarely exhibit systemic symptoms of mast cell mediator release; however, generalized flushing, hypotension, headaches, and gastrointestinal symptoms may occur, particularly if the lesion is vigorously rubbed.6,7 Conditions in the differential include aplasia cutis congenita, connective tissue nevus, epidermal nevus, and epidermolysis bullosa. They should not elicit a blister if rubbed, except for epidermolysis bullosa, which can easily be differentiated based on histology.

The workup for cutaneous mastocytosis in the pediatric population may include a biopsy of lesional skin, though in many cases the characteristic cutaneous manifestations are sufficient to make a diagnosis. Histologically, biopsy results often reveal abundant diffuse dermal infiltration of mast cells, which are characterized by their large pink granular cytoplasm and round dense central nuclei. In pediatric patients, mast cells typically are restricted to the dermis, and there is a low risk for hematologic abnormalities, thereby precluding the need for bone marrow examination in the absence of organomegaly or notable peripheral blood abnormalities such as severe cytopenia.5,6

Management of cutaneous mastocytosis consists of avoidance of mast cell degranulation triggers and symptomatic treatment of histamine release. Triggers include certain medications (eg, narcotic analgesics, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, iodinated contrast agents, antibiotics, muscle relaxants), mechanical irritation, insect stings, spicy foods, stress, or extreme temperature changes.8 Symptomatic treatment can be achieved through topical corticosteroid or oral antihistamine use. Along with decreasing pruritus, topical corticosteroids also may be helpful in decreasing time to spontaneous resolution and healing.7 The patient in this case was treated with desonide ointment 0.05% daily to both lesions as well as mupirocin ointment 2% as needed for erosions. These treatments helped reduce the patient's symptoms, but her lesions persisted over a follow-up period of 4 months.

References
  1. Valent P, Sperr WR, Schwartz LB, et al. Diagnosis and classification of mast cell proliferative disorders: delineation from immunologic diseases and non-mast cell hematopoietic neoplasms. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114:3-11.  
  2. Bibi S, Langenfeld F, Jeanningros S, et al. Molecular defects in mastocytosis: KIT and beyond KIT. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2014;34:239-262.  
  3. Yavuz AS, Lipsky PE, Yavuz S, et al. Evidence for the involvement of a hematopoietic progenitor cell in systemic mastocytosis from single-cell analysis of mutations in the c-kit gene. Blood. 2002;100:661-665.  
  4. Méni C, Bruneau J, Georgin-Lavialle S, et al. Paediatric mastocytosis: a systematic review of 1747 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172:642-651.  
  5. Valent P, Horny HP, Escribano L, et al. Diagnostic criteria and classification of mastocytosis: a consensus proposal. Leuk Res. 2001;25:603-625.  
  6. Wolff K, Komar M, Petzelbauer P. Clinical and histopathological aspects of cutaneous mastocytosis. Leuk Res. 2001;25:519-528.  
  7. Patrizi A, Tabanelli M, Neri I, et al. Topical corticosteroids versus "wait and see" in the management of solitary mastocytoma in pediatric patients: a long-term follow-up. Dermatol Ther. 2015;28:57-61.  
  8. Bonadonna P, Lombardo C. Drug allergy in mastocytosis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2014;34:397-405.  
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Schenck is from the Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. Drs. Blechman, Kaley, and Greer are from the Department of Dermatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Adam B. Blechman, MD, University of Virginia Health System, Department of Dermatology, 1221 Lee St, PO Box 800718, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0718 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 99(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
230, 261, 264
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Schenck is from the Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. Drs. Blechman, Kaley, and Greer are from the Department of Dermatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Adam B. Blechman, MD, University of Virginia Health System, Department of Dermatology, 1221 Lee St, PO Box 800718, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0718 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Schenck is from the Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. Drs. Blechman, Kaley, and Greer are from the Department of Dermatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Adam B. Blechman, MD, University of Virginia Health System, Department of Dermatology, 1221 Lee St, PO Box 800718, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0718 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

The Diagnosis: Cutaneous Mastocytoma

Physical examination revealed a 58×51-mm hyperpigmented plaque with central pink coloration and scale on the right side of the back as well as a 39×33-mm pink plaque with a hyperpigmented border on the left side of the flank (Figure 1). At follow-up 2 weeks later, the patient's parents reported that blisters formed within both of the plaques. The blisters ruptured a few hours after forming and drained clear fluid with scant blood. Both plaques contained erosions from the ruptured bullae but remained the same size with no surrounding erythema or warmth. A 4-mm punch biopsy was performed of intact skin from the back lesion (Figure 2A). Histologic examination revealed a cellular infiltrate of monotonous bland cells that completely filled the dermis without epidermal involvement, along with occasional intermixed eosinophils. The morphology of these infiltrating cells was compatible with mast cells confirmed by strongly positive Leder staining (Figure 2B).

Figure 1. Cutaneous mastocytoma. Lesion on the left side of the flank 1 month after birth during a follow-up visit.

Figure 2. A 4-mm punch biopsy of the lesion on the right side of the back revealed an infiltrate of monotonous bland cells that filled the dermis with occasional eosinophils (A)(H&E, original magnification ×10). Leder stain of the biopsy specimen was strongly positive for mast cell infiltrate (B)(original magnification ×20).

Mastocytosis encompasses a rare group of disorders characterized by abnormal mast cell accumulation or mast cell mediator release in various tissues. These disorders can be classified as either systemic mastocytosis with mast cell infiltration into bone marrow or other extracutaneous organs, or cutaneous mastocytosis with disease limited to the skin.1 Mutations involving activation of the c-Kit receptor in stimulating mast cell growth and development have been implicated in both systemic and cutaneous forms of the disease.2,3

Cutaneous mastocytosis is most often diagnosed in childhood and typically is characterized by spontaneous regression before puberty in a majority of cases.1,4 Under the World Health Organization classification system, cutaneous mastocytosis can be further subdivided into 3 disorders (listed in order of most to least common): urticaria pigmentosa (also known as maculopapular cutaneous mastocytosis) with typical, plaque, and nodular forms; cutaneous mastocytoma (as seen in this patient); and diffuse cutaneous mastocytosis.5 Compared to the widespread distribution of small macules and papules in urticaria pigmentosa, the cutaneous mastocytoma subtype presents with 1 to 6 brown to orange-yellow plaques or nodules measuring more than 1 cm in diameter. Cutaneous mastocytoma typically presents in infancy and is located most commonly on the trunk and extremities, though it may be found on the face or scalp. The plaques of mastocytoma often have well-defined margins, and these lesions may become bullous or demonstrate Darier sign of urtication and erythema on physical stimulation. Patients most commonly experience pruritus from mast cell degranulation and rarely exhibit systemic symptoms of mast cell mediator release; however, generalized flushing, hypotension, headaches, and gastrointestinal symptoms may occur, particularly if the lesion is vigorously rubbed.6,7 Conditions in the differential include aplasia cutis congenita, connective tissue nevus, epidermal nevus, and epidermolysis bullosa. They should not elicit a blister if rubbed, except for epidermolysis bullosa, which can easily be differentiated based on histology.

The workup for cutaneous mastocytosis in the pediatric population may include a biopsy of lesional skin, though in many cases the characteristic cutaneous manifestations are sufficient to make a diagnosis. Histologically, biopsy results often reveal abundant diffuse dermal infiltration of mast cells, which are characterized by their large pink granular cytoplasm and round dense central nuclei. In pediatric patients, mast cells typically are restricted to the dermis, and there is a low risk for hematologic abnormalities, thereby precluding the need for bone marrow examination in the absence of organomegaly or notable peripheral blood abnormalities such as severe cytopenia.5,6

Management of cutaneous mastocytosis consists of avoidance of mast cell degranulation triggers and symptomatic treatment of histamine release. Triggers include certain medications (eg, narcotic analgesics, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, iodinated contrast agents, antibiotics, muscle relaxants), mechanical irritation, insect stings, spicy foods, stress, or extreme temperature changes.8 Symptomatic treatment can be achieved through topical corticosteroid or oral antihistamine use. Along with decreasing pruritus, topical corticosteroids also may be helpful in decreasing time to spontaneous resolution and healing.7 The patient in this case was treated with desonide ointment 0.05% daily to both lesions as well as mupirocin ointment 2% as needed for erosions. These treatments helped reduce the patient's symptoms, but her lesions persisted over a follow-up period of 4 months.

The Diagnosis: Cutaneous Mastocytoma

Physical examination revealed a 58×51-mm hyperpigmented plaque with central pink coloration and scale on the right side of the back as well as a 39×33-mm pink plaque with a hyperpigmented border on the left side of the flank (Figure 1). At follow-up 2 weeks later, the patient's parents reported that blisters formed within both of the plaques. The blisters ruptured a few hours after forming and drained clear fluid with scant blood. Both plaques contained erosions from the ruptured bullae but remained the same size with no surrounding erythema or warmth. A 4-mm punch biopsy was performed of intact skin from the back lesion (Figure 2A). Histologic examination revealed a cellular infiltrate of monotonous bland cells that completely filled the dermis without epidermal involvement, along with occasional intermixed eosinophils. The morphology of these infiltrating cells was compatible with mast cells confirmed by strongly positive Leder staining (Figure 2B).

Figure 1. Cutaneous mastocytoma. Lesion on the left side of the flank 1 month after birth during a follow-up visit.

Figure 2. A 4-mm punch biopsy of the lesion on the right side of the back revealed an infiltrate of monotonous bland cells that filled the dermis with occasional eosinophils (A)(H&E, original magnification ×10). Leder stain of the biopsy specimen was strongly positive for mast cell infiltrate (B)(original magnification ×20).

Mastocytosis encompasses a rare group of disorders characterized by abnormal mast cell accumulation or mast cell mediator release in various tissues. These disorders can be classified as either systemic mastocytosis with mast cell infiltration into bone marrow or other extracutaneous organs, or cutaneous mastocytosis with disease limited to the skin.1 Mutations involving activation of the c-Kit receptor in stimulating mast cell growth and development have been implicated in both systemic and cutaneous forms of the disease.2,3

Cutaneous mastocytosis is most often diagnosed in childhood and typically is characterized by spontaneous regression before puberty in a majority of cases.1,4 Under the World Health Organization classification system, cutaneous mastocytosis can be further subdivided into 3 disorders (listed in order of most to least common): urticaria pigmentosa (also known as maculopapular cutaneous mastocytosis) with typical, plaque, and nodular forms; cutaneous mastocytoma (as seen in this patient); and diffuse cutaneous mastocytosis.5 Compared to the widespread distribution of small macules and papules in urticaria pigmentosa, the cutaneous mastocytoma subtype presents with 1 to 6 brown to orange-yellow plaques or nodules measuring more than 1 cm in diameter. Cutaneous mastocytoma typically presents in infancy and is located most commonly on the trunk and extremities, though it may be found on the face or scalp. The plaques of mastocytoma often have well-defined margins, and these lesions may become bullous or demonstrate Darier sign of urtication and erythema on physical stimulation. Patients most commonly experience pruritus from mast cell degranulation and rarely exhibit systemic symptoms of mast cell mediator release; however, generalized flushing, hypotension, headaches, and gastrointestinal symptoms may occur, particularly if the lesion is vigorously rubbed.6,7 Conditions in the differential include aplasia cutis congenita, connective tissue nevus, epidermal nevus, and epidermolysis bullosa. They should not elicit a blister if rubbed, except for epidermolysis bullosa, which can easily be differentiated based on histology.

The workup for cutaneous mastocytosis in the pediatric population may include a biopsy of lesional skin, though in many cases the characteristic cutaneous manifestations are sufficient to make a diagnosis. Histologically, biopsy results often reveal abundant diffuse dermal infiltration of mast cells, which are characterized by their large pink granular cytoplasm and round dense central nuclei. In pediatric patients, mast cells typically are restricted to the dermis, and there is a low risk for hematologic abnormalities, thereby precluding the need for bone marrow examination in the absence of organomegaly or notable peripheral blood abnormalities such as severe cytopenia.5,6

Management of cutaneous mastocytosis consists of avoidance of mast cell degranulation triggers and symptomatic treatment of histamine release. Triggers include certain medications (eg, narcotic analgesics, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, iodinated contrast agents, antibiotics, muscle relaxants), mechanical irritation, insect stings, spicy foods, stress, or extreme temperature changes.8 Symptomatic treatment can be achieved through topical corticosteroid or oral antihistamine use. Along with decreasing pruritus, topical corticosteroids also may be helpful in decreasing time to spontaneous resolution and healing.7 The patient in this case was treated with desonide ointment 0.05% daily to both lesions as well as mupirocin ointment 2% as needed for erosions. These treatments helped reduce the patient's symptoms, but her lesions persisted over a follow-up period of 4 months.

References
  1. Valent P, Sperr WR, Schwartz LB, et al. Diagnosis and classification of mast cell proliferative disorders: delineation from immunologic diseases and non-mast cell hematopoietic neoplasms. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114:3-11.  
  2. Bibi S, Langenfeld F, Jeanningros S, et al. Molecular defects in mastocytosis: KIT and beyond KIT. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2014;34:239-262.  
  3. Yavuz AS, Lipsky PE, Yavuz S, et al. Evidence for the involvement of a hematopoietic progenitor cell in systemic mastocytosis from single-cell analysis of mutations in the c-kit gene. Blood. 2002;100:661-665.  
  4. Méni C, Bruneau J, Georgin-Lavialle S, et al. Paediatric mastocytosis: a systematic review of 1747 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172:642-651.  
  5. Valent P, Horny HP, Escribano L, et al. Diagnostic criteria and classification of mastocytosis: a consensus proposal. Leuk Res. 2001;25:603-625.  
  6. Wolff K, Komar M, Petzelbauer P. Clinical and histopathological aspects of cutaneous mastocytosis. Leuk Res. 2001;25:519-528.  
  7. Patrizi A, Tabanelli M, Neri I, et al. Topical corticosteroids versus "wait and see" in the management of solitary mastocytoma in pediatric patients: a long-term follow-up. Dermatol Ther. 2015;28:57-61.  
  8. Bonadonna P, Lombardo C. Drug allergy in mastocytosis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2014;34:397-405.  
References
  1. Valent P, Sperr WR, Schwartz LB, et al. Diagnosis and classification of mast cell proliferative disorders: delineation from immunologic diseases and non-mast cell hematopoietic neoplasms. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114:3-11.  
  2. Bibi S, Langenfeld F, Jeanningros S, et al. Molecular defects in mastocytosis: KIT and beyond KIT. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2014;34:239-262.  
  3. Yavuz AS, Lipsky PE, Yavuz S, et al. Evidence for the involvement of a hematopoietic progenitor cell in systemic mastocytosis from single-cell analysis of mutations in the c-kit gene. Blood. 2002;100:661-665.  
  4. Méni C, Bruneau J, Georgin-Lavialle S, et al. Paediatric mastocytosis: a systematic review of 1747 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172:642-651.  
  5. Valent P, Horny HP, Escribano L, et al. Diagnostic criteria and classification of mastocytosis: a consensus proposal. Leuk Res. 2001;25:603-625.  
  6. Wolff K, Komar M, Petzelbauer P. Clinical and histopathological aspects of cutaneous mastocytosis. Leuk Res. 2001;25:519-528.  
  7. Patrizi A, Tabanelli M, Neri I, et al. Topical corticosteroids versus "wait and see" in the management of solitary mastocytoma in pediatric patients: a long-term follow-up. Dermatol Ther. 2015;28:57-61.  
  8. Bonadonna P, Lombardo C. Drug allergy in mastocytosis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2014;34:397-405.  
Issue
Cutis - 99(4)
Issue
Cutis - 99(4)
Page Number
230, 261, 264
Page Number
230, 261, 264
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Large Hyperpigmented Plaques on the Trunk of a Newborn
Display Headline
Large Hyperpigmented Plaques on the Trunk of a Newborn
Sections
Questionnaire Body

A 4-day-old girl with no notable medical history presented with 2 pink lesions on the right side of the back and left side of the flank. Both lesions were present at birth and had not changed in size, shape, or color in the first 4 days of life. She had no constitutional symptoms. The child was a full-term newborn, and her mother experienced no pregnancy or delivery complications. She had no family history of similar skin findings.  
 

 

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
PubMed ID
28492596
Article PDF Media

Systemic Hypothermia as Treatment for an Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in a Professional Football Player: 9-Year Follow-Up

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 09/19/2019 - 13:22
Display Headline
Systemic Hypothermia as Treatment for an Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in a Professional Football Player: 9-Year Follow-Up

Take-Home Points

  • Importance of on-field management.
  • Preseason drilling of spinal injury management.
  • Early and rapid intervention.
  • Possible benefit of moderate systemic hypothermia as treatment for acute cervical injury.

In 2010, we reported the case of a professional American football player who sustained a complete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) while tackling an opposing player.1 He received prompt medical and surgical care based on then-current recommendations, but was also treated with systemic hypothermia soon after his injury. Although systemic hypothermia had been used in the management of other neurologic injuries at that time, it had not been used in humans with acute SCI, except as described in 2 case reports.2,3 However, Dietrich4 described early emerging animal data on the efficacy of systemic hypothermia for acute SCI. We now provide a clinical update on our patient, who provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.

Case Report

During a National Football League game, the player sustained a C3–C4 fracture-dislocation after a helmet-to-helmet hit on an opposing player. He fell face down on the ground and did not move. The team’s physician and trainer rushed to the player’s side, immediately assessed him, and initiated the emergency spinal resuscitation protocol.

As per protocol, the assigned team leader took charge of managing the player’s head to maintain in-line traction with the helmet in place until the head was secured in place on a backboard designed to accommodate the helmet.

Figure 1.
In addition, 6 assistants were tasked with rolling the player to prone position with his head in traction. An equipment technician rapidly removed the player’s mask, leaving the helmet in place. The trauma ABCs (airway, breathing, circulation) were assessed. Once the airway was stable, the 6-person roll technique was used, under the team leader’s direction, to place the player on the backboard and secure him to it. Paramedics were ready to commence resuscitation, and an ambulance was driven onto the field (Figures 1-3).

Complete motor paralysis and sensory loss (American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] level A) were noted below the clavicles during physical examination by the head athletic trainer and 2 independent physicians, and by self-report.
Figure 2.
The patient was breathing adequately despite feeling dyspneic. He was transferred to the ambulance within 15 minutes of injury, and there he received intravenous methylprednisolone in accordance with the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) 2 protocol (Figure 3).5
Figure 3.
With the goal being to achieve relative hypothermia, chilled saline was infused intravenously, rotating ice packs were applied to the axillae and groin, the patient’s garments were removed, and the ambient temperature in the ambulance was lowered to 55°F. Repeated clinical examination in the ambulance revealed bulbocavernosus response, indicating resolution of spinal shock, though there was still no motor or sensory function below the clavicles (remained ASIA level A). During transportation, the patient was hemodynamically monitored and found to be stable, with no evidence of neurogenic shock. After 30 minutes of resuscitation, he showed slight improvement; by the time the ambulance arrived at the emergency department, crude pressure and vibratory sensation in the extremities were apparent.

On arrival at the hospital, the patient had a core temperature of 98°F, which is substantially lower than the average core temperature (≤101.7°F) of an active football player.6He had a normal level of consciousness and normal cranial nerve function but remained without any voluntary motor function in the extremities and still had no sensation below the clavicles, except crude pressure sensation in one hand while in the emergency department. After the helmet and shoulder pads were removed, per National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA) protocol(Figure 2), he was stabilized, and a hard cervical collar was placed. A lateral radiograph (Figure 4) showed a C3–C4 facet dislocation with about 46% anterior translation of C3 on C4 and obvious disruption of the facets.
Figure 4.
Computed tomography (CT) confirmed a left C3–C4 complete facet dislocation and a right C3–C4 facet subluxation with a “perched” facet, and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) measurements showed the same canal compromise (~55%) found with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After CT and before MRI, repeat clinical examination revealed persistent complete motor paralysis and rudimentary sensation to deep pressure below the nipples, with proprioception indicating anterior cord syndrome. At this point, hyperreflexia and nonsustained clonus were noted. MRI showed a small right central and paracentral disk herniation superimposed on signal change within the cord as it was draped over the posterosuperior aspect of C4.

About 3 hours after injury, the patient was taken to the operating room. Although closed reduction improved alignment dramatically, it failed to completely reduce the dislocated left C3–C4 facet. An hour later, anterior C3–C4 discectomy was performed from the front with instrumented anterior interbody fusion. This was immediately followed by posterior decompressive laminectomy, bilateral facet reduction, and fusion with instrumentation. Surgery was completed within about 4 hours, almost exactly 7 hours after injury. Anesthesia records indicated a core temperature range of 94.1°F to 95.3°F with passive cooling during surgery. CT and MRI performed within 4 hours after surgery showed excellent cord decompression.

The next morning, about 14.5 hours after injury, the patient demonstrated a flicker of the adductor muscles of the lower extremities. An examination an hour later revealed 1/5 quadriceps, 2/5 adductors, and 1/5 gastrocnemius/soleus. A nurse’s hourly examinations and the surgeon’s repeat examinations revealed no other motor function. Sensory function was more difficult to evaluate because of sedation, but rudimentary sensation was noted throughout the lower extremities, and proprioception and vibratory sensation were noted as well. With passive cooling, it was difficult to consistently maintain moderate hypothermia; the patient’s core temperature ranged from 94.8°F to 98.8°F by 6:00 a.m. Therefore, the decision was made to place a Cordis sheath in the left femoral vein and introduce an intra-vena cava cooling catheter through it. This catheter was highly effective in maintaining the patient’s temperature at about 92.5°F.

Over the next 36 hours, the patient demonstrated increased motor activity in the upper and lower extremities: 1/5 biceps, 2-3/5 triceps, 3/5 quadriceps. He was slowly rewarmed and, on postoperative day 3, extubated.
Figure 5.
Continued intravascular cooling was used for several more days to maintain normal body temperature and avoid hyperthermia. During his 12-day hospital stay, the patient showed improvement in all leg muscle groups (3-4/5 motor strength) and minimal return of upper extremity motor function (0/5 deltoids, 1/5 biceps, 3/5 triceps, 1/5 first dorsal interosseous) After discharge to a rehabilitation facility, the patient improved dramatically, but discernible deficits in sensation, strength, coordination, and endurance (ASIA level D) lasted several months, improving only slowly. A year after injury, he was ambulating independently and having normal bowel, bladder, and sexual function but residual sensory deficits in the hands and feet (glove-and-stocking distribution) and significant deficits in fine motor movement.

At 2 years, the patient underwent another anterior-only cervical procedure: The inferior adjacent segment (C4–C5) was fused because of neck pain and deformity.
Figure 6.
Residual deficits now included only occasional tingling in fingertips and toe tips, and the patient continued to improve. Nine years after injury, he had a relapse of mechanical neck pain only and was being treated for additional adjacent segment disease.

With respect to the original injury and the evolution in cord appearance, the patient had solid arthrodesis from C3–C5 with instrumentation in good position. There was evidence of loss of lordosis at C5–C6 with disk dessication and broad-based bulging. The spinal cord had evidence of myelomalacia; this was noted when the patient was in rehabilitation, 1 month after injury. The 2-cm × 11-mm area of myelomalacia was directly posterior to the fused C3–C4 interval (original MRI, Figure 5; 2-week MRI, Figure 6).

 

 

Conclusion

At the time this player was injured, use of systemic hypothermia with standard therapy for acute SCI was unique and controversial. Since then, smaller randomized human studies have described the tolerable safety profile, efficacy, and potential benefits of this intervention in acute SCI in humans.8-10 Now, modest systemic hypothermia can be one of many tools considered in the treatment of acute SCI. Before it can become the standard of care, however, additional larger prospective randomized studies need to be completed.

Am J Orthop. 2017;46(2):E79-E82. Copyright Frontline Medical Communications Inc. 2017. All rights reserved.

References

1. Cappuccino A, Bisson LJ, Carpenter B, Marzo J, Dietrich WD 3rd, Cappuccino H. The use of systemic hypothermia for the treatment of an acute cervical spinal cord injury in a professional football player. Spine. 2010;35(2):E57-E62.

2. Goldstein J. Lowering body temp shows promise for trauma treatment. Spinal Cord Injury Information Pages news blog. http://www.sci-info-pages.com/2006/05/lowering-body-temp-shows-promise-for.html. Published May 3, 2006. Accessed March 19, 2009.

3. Hartemink KJ, Wisselink W, Rauwerda JA, Girbes AR, Polderman KH. Novel applications of therapeutic hypothermia: report of three cases. Crit Care. 2004;8(5):R343-R346.

4. Dietrich WD. Presidential address presented at: 34th Annual Meeting of the Cervical Spine Research Society; November 30, 2006; Palm Beach, FL.

5. Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(20):1405-1411.

6. Horodyski MB, LuCante K, Escobar E, et al. Intermittent Cool, Dry Air Underneath Football Shoulder Pads Assists in Temperature Homeostasis. In: The American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Proceedings 2008; 87-88.

7. Kleiner DM, Almquist JL, Bailes J, et al; Inter-Association Task Force for Appropriate Care of the Spine-Injured Athlete. Prehospital Care of the Spine-Injured Athlete. Dallas, TX: National Athletic Trainers’ Association; 2001. http://www.msata.org/Resources/Documents/PreHospitalCare4SpineInjuredAthlete.pdf. Published March 2001. Accessed January 10, 2017.

8. Dididze M, Green BA, Dietrich WD, Vanni S, Wang MY, Levi AD. Systemic hypothermia in acute cervical spinal cord injury: a case-controlled study. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(5):395-400.

9. Levi AD, Casella G, Green BA, et al. Clinical outcomes using modest intravascular hypothermia after acute cervical spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(4):670-677.

10. Levi AD, Green BA, Wang MY, et al. Clinical application of modest hypothermia after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26(3):407-415.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Authors’ Disclosure Statement: The authors report no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Issue
The American Journal of Orthopedics - 46(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E79-E82
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Authors’ Disclosure Statement: The authors report no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Author and Disclosure Information

Authors’ Disclosure Statement: The authors report no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Article PDF
Article PDF

Take-Home Points

  • Importance of on-field management.
  • Preseason drilling of spinal injury management.
  • Early and rapid intervention.
  • Possible benefit of moderate systemic hypothermia as treatment for acute cervical injury.

In 2010, we reported the case of a professional American football player who sustained a complete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) while tackling an opposing player.1 He received prompt medical and surgical care based on then-current recommendations, but was also treated with systemic hypothermia soon after his injury. Although systemic hypothermia had been used in the management of other neurologic injuries at that time, it had not been used in humans with acute SCI, except as described in 2 case reports.2,3 However, Dietrich4 described early emerging animal data on the efficacy of systemic hypothermia for acute SCI. We now provide a clinical update on our patient, who provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.

Case Report

During a National Football League game, the player sustained a C3–C4 fracture-dislocation after a helmet-to-helmet hit on an opposing player. He fell face down on the ground and did not move. The team’s physician and trainer rushed to the player’s side, immediately assessed him, and initiated the emergency spinal resuscitation protocol.

As per protocol, the assigned team leader took charge of managing the player’s head to maintain in-line traction with the helmet in place until the head was secured in place on a backboard designed to accommodate the helmet.

Figure 1.
In addition, 6 assistants were tasked with rolling the player to prone position with his head in traction. An equipment technician rapidly removed the player’s mask, leaving the helmet in place. The trauma ABCs (airway, breathing, circulation) were assessed. Once the airway was stable, the 6-person roll technique was used, under the team leader’s direction, to place the player on the backboard and secure him to it. Paramedics were ready to commence resuscitation, and an ambulance was driven onto the field (Figures 1-3).

Complete motor paralysis and sensory loss (American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] level A) were noted below the clavicles during physical examination by the head athletic trainer and 2 independent physicians, and by self-report.
Figure 2.
The patient was breathing adequately despite feeling dyspneic. He was transferred to the ambulance within 15 minutes of injury, and there he received intravenous methylprednisolone in accordance with the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) 2 protocol (Figure 3).5
Figure 3.
With the goal being to achieve relative hypothermia, chilled saline was infused intravenously, rotating ice packs were applied to the axillae and groin, the patient’s garments were removed, and the ambient temperature in the ambulance was lowered to 55°F. Repeated clinical examination in the ambulance revealed bulbocavernosus response, indicating resolution of spinal shock, though there was still no motor or sensory function below the clavicles (remained ASIA level A). During transportation, the patient was hemodynamically monitored and found to be stable, with no evidence of neurogenic shock. After 30 minutes of resuscitation, he showed slight improvement; by the time the ambulance arrived at the emergency department, crude pressure and vibratory sensation in the extremities were apparent.

On arrival at the hospital, the patient had a core temperature of 98°F, which is substantially lower than the average core temperature (≤101.7°F) of an active football player.6He had a normal level of consciousness and normal cranial nerve function but remained without any voluntary motor function in the extremities and still had no sensation below the clavicles, except crude pressure sensation in one hand while in the emergency department. After the helmet and shoulder pads were removed, per National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA) protocol(Figure 2), he was stabilized, and a hard cervical collar was placed. A lateral radiograph (Figure 4) showed a C3–C4 facet dislocation with about 46% anterior translation of C3 on C4 and obvious disruption of the facets.
Figure 4.
Computed tomography (CT) confirmed a left C3–C4 complete facet dislocation and a right C3–C4 facet subluxation with a “perched” facet, and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) measurements showed the same canal compromise (~55%) found with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After CT and before MRI, repeat clinical examination revealed persistent complete motor paralysis and rudimentary sensation to deep pressure below the nipples, with proprioception indicating anterior cord syndrome. At this point, hyperreflexia and nonsustained clonus were noted. MRI showed a small right central and paracentral disk herniation superimposed on signal change within the cord as it was draped over the posterosuperior aspect of C4.

About 3 hours after injury, the patient was taken to the operating room. Although closed reduction improved alignment dramatically, it failed to completely reduce the dislocated left C3–C4 facet. An hour later, anterior C3–C4 discectomy was performed from the front with instrumented anterior interbody fusion. This was immediately followed by posterior decompressive laminectomy, bilateral facet reduction, and fusion with instrumentation. Surgery was completed within about 4 hours, almost exactly 7 hours after injury. Anesthesia records indicated a core temperature range of 94.1°F to 95.3°F with passive cooling during surgery. CT and MRI performed within 4 hours after surgery showed excellent cord decompression.

The next morning, about 14.5 hours after injury, the patient demonstrated a flicker of the adductor muscles of the lower extremities. An examination an hour later revealed 1/5 quadriceps, 2/5 adductors, and 1/5 gastrocnemius/soleus. A nurse’s hourly examinations and the surgeon’s repeat examinations revealed no other motor function. Sensory function was more difficult to evaluate because of sedation, but rudimentary sensation was noted throughout the lower extremities, and proprioception and vibratory sensation were noted as well. With passive cooling, it was difficult to consistently maintain moderate hypothermia; the patient’s core temperature ranged from 94.8°F to 98.8°F by 6:00 a.m. Therefore, the decision was made to place a Cordis sheath in the left femoral vein and introduce an intra-vena cava cooling catheter through it. This catheter was highly effective in maintaining the patient’s temperature at about 92.5°F.

Over the next 36 hours, the patient demonstrated increased motor activity in the upper and lower extremities: 1/5 biceps, 2-3/5 triceps, 3/5 quadriceps. He was slowly rewarmed and, on postoperative day 3, extubated.
Figure 5.
Continued intravascular cooling was used for several more days to maintain normal body temperature and avoid hyperthermia. During his 12-day hospital stay, the patient showed improvement in all leg muscle groups (3-4/5 motor strength) and minimal return of upper extremity motor function (0/5 deltoids, 1/5 biceps, 3/5 triceps, 1/5 first dorsal interosseous) After discharge to a rehabilitation facility, the patient improved dramatically, but discernible deficits in sensation, strength, coordination, and endurance (ASIA level D) lasted several months, improving only slowly. A year after injury, he was ambulating independently and having normal bowel, bladder, and sexual function but residual sensory deficits in the hands and feet (glove-and-stocking distribution) and significant deficits in fine motor movement.

At 2 years, the patient underwent another anterior-only cervical procedure: The inferior adjacent segment (C4–C5) was fused because of neck pain and deformity.
Figure 6.
Residual deficits now included only occasional tingling in fingertips and toe tips, and the patient continued to improve. Nine years after injury, he had a relapse of mechanical neck pain only and was being treated for additional adjacent segment disease.

With respect to the original injury and the evolution in cord appearance, the patient had solid arthrodesis from C3–C5 with instrumentation in good position. There was evidence of loss of lordosis at C5–C6 with disk dessication and broad-based bulging. The spinal cord had evidence of myelomalacia; this was noted when the patient was in rehabilitation, 1 month after injury. The 2-cm × 11-mm area of myelomalacia was directly posterior to the fused C3–C4 interval (original MRI, Figure 5; 2-week MRI, Figure 6).

 

 

Conclusion

At the time this player was injured, use of systemic hypothermia with standard therapy for acute SCI was unique and controversial. Since then, smaller randomized human studies have described the tolerable safety profile, efficacy, and potential benefits of this intervention in acute SCI in humans.8-10 Now, modest systemic hypothermia can be one of many tools considered in the treatment of acute SCI. Before it can become the standard of care, however, additional larger prospective randomized studies need to be completed.

Am J Orthop. 2017;46(2):E79-E82. Copyright Frontline Medical Communications Inc. 2017. All rights reserved.

Take-Home Points

  • Importance of on-field management.
  • Preseason drilling of spinal injury management.
  • Early and rapid intervention.
  • Possible benefit of moderate systemic hypothermia as treatment for acute cervical injury.

In 2010, we reported the case of a professional American football player who sustained a complete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) while tackling an opposing player.1 He received prompt medical and surgical care based on then-current recommendations, but was also treated with systemic hypothermia soon after his injury. Although systemic hypothermia had been used in the management of other neurologic injuries at that time, it had not been used in humans with acute SCI, except as described in 2 case reports.2,3 However, Dietrich4 described early emerging animal data on the efficacy of systemic hypothermia for acute SCI. We now provide a clinical update on our patient, who provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.

Case Report

During a National Football League game, the player sustained a C3–C4 fracture-dislocation after a helmet-to-helmet hit on an opposing player. He fell face down on the ground and did not move. The team’s physician and trainer rushed to the player’s side, immediately assessed him, and initiated the emergency spinal resuscitation protocol.

As per protocol, the assigned team leader took charge of managing the player’s head to maintain in-line traction with the helmet in place until the head was secured in place on a backboard designed to accommodate the helmet.

Figure 1.
In addition, 6 assistants were tasked with rolling the player to prone position with his head in traction. An equipment technician rapidly removed the player’s mask, leaving the helmet in place. The trauma ABCs (airway, breathing, circulation) were assessed. Once the airway was stable, the 6-person roll technique was used, under the team leader’s direction, to place the player on the backboard and secure him to it. Paramedics were ready to commence resuscitation, and an ambulance was driven onto the field (Figures 1-3).

Complete motor paralysis and sensory loss (American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] level A) were noted below the clavicles during physical examination by the head athletic trainer and 2 independent physicians, and by self-report.
Figure 2.
The patient was breathing adequately despite feeling dyspneic. He was transferred to the ambulance within 15 minutes of injury, and there he received intravenous methylprednisolone in accordance with the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) 2 protocol (Figure 3).5
Figure 3.
With the goal being to achieve relative hypothermia, chilled saline was infused intravenously, rotating ice packs were applied to the axillae and groin, the patient’s garments were removed, and the ambient temperature in the ambulance was lowered to 55°F. Repeated clinical examination in the ambulance revealed bulbocavernosus response, indicating resolution of spinal shock, though there was still no motor or sensory function below the clavicles (remained ASIA level A). During transportation, the patient was hemodynamically monitored and found to be stable, with no evidence of neurogenic shock. After 30 minutes of resuscitation, he showed slight improvement; by the time the ambulance arrived at the emergency department, crude pressure and vibratory sensation in the extremities were apparent.

On arrival at the hospital, the patient had a core temperature of 98°F, which is substantially lower than the average core temperature (≤101.7°F) of an active football player.6He had a normal level of consciousness and normal cranial nerve function but remained without any voluntary motor function in the extremities and still had no sensation below the clavicles, except crude pressure sensation in one hand while in the emergency department. After the helmet and shoulder pads were removed, per National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA) protocol(Figure 2), he was stabilized, and a hard cervical collar was placed. A lateral radiograph (Figure 4) showed a C3–C4 facet dislocation with about 46% anterior translation of C3 on C4 and obvious disruption of the facets.
Figure 4.
Computed tomography (CT) confirmed a left C3–C4 complete facet dislocation and a right C3–C4 facet subluxation with a “perched” facet, and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) measurements showed the same canal compromise (~55%) found with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After CT and before MRI, repeat clinical examination revealed persistent complete motor paralysis and rudimentary sensation to deep pressure below the nipples, with proprioception indicating anterior cord syndrome. At this point, hyperreflexia and nonsustained clonus were noted. MRI showed a small right central and paracentral disk herniation superimposed on signal change within the cord as it was draped over the posterosuperior aspect of C4.

About 3 hours after injury, the patient was taken to the operating room. Although closed reduction improved alignment dramatically, it failed to completely reduce the dislocated left C3–C4 facet. An hour later, anterior C3–C4 discectomy was performed from the front with instrumented anterior interbody fusion. This was immediately followed by posterior decompressive laminectomy, bilateral facet reduction, and fusion with instrumentation. Surgery was completed within about 4 hours, almost exactly 7 hours after injury. Anesthesia records indicated a core temperature range of 94.1°F to 95.3°F with passive cooling during surgery. CT and MRI performed within 4 hours after surgery showed excellent cord decompression.

The next morning, about 14.5 hours after injury, the patient demonstrated a flicker of the adductor muscles of the lower extremities. An examination an hour later revealed 1/5 quadriceps, 2/5 adductors, and 1/5 gastrocnemius/soleus. A nurse’s hourly examinations and the surgeon’s repeat examinations revealed no other motor function. Sensory function was more difficult to evaluate because of sedation, but rudimentary sensation was noted throughout the lower extremities, and proprioception and vibratory sensation were noted as well. With passive cooling, it was difficult to consistently maintain moderate hypothermia; the patient’s core temperature ranged from 94.8°F to 98.8°F by 6:00 a.m. Therefore, the decision was made to place a Cordis sheath in the left femoral vein and introduce an intra-vena cava cooling catheter through it. This catheter was highly effective in maintaining the patient’s temperature at about 92.5°F.

Over the next 36 hours, the patient demonstrated increased motor activity in the upper and lower extremities: 1/5 biceps, 2-3/5 triceps, 3/5 quadriceps. He was slowly rewarmed and, on postoperative day 3, extubated.
Figure 5.
Continued intravascular cooling was used for several more days to maintain normal body temperature and avoid hyperthermia. During his 12-day hospital stay, the patient showed improvement in all leg muscle groups (3-4/5 motor strength) and minimal return of upper extremity motor function (0/5 deltoids, 1/5 biceps, 3/5 triceps, 1/5 first dorsal interosseous) After discharge to a rehabilitation facility, the patient improved dramatically, but discernible deficits in sensation, strength, coordination, and endurance (ASIA level D) lasted several months, improving only slowly. A year after injury, he was ambulating independently and having normal bowel, bladder, and sexual function but residual sensory deficits in the hands and feet (glove-and-stocking distribution) and significant deficits in fine motor movement.

At 2 years, the patient underwent another anterior-only cervical procedure: The inferior adjacent segment (C4–C5) was fused because of neck pain and deformity.
Figure 6.
Residual deficits now included only occasional tingling in fingertips and toe tips, and the patient continued to improve. Nine years after injury, he had a relapse of mechanical neck pain only and was being treated for additional adjacent segment disease.

With respect to the original injury and the evolution in cord appearance, the patient had solid arthrodesis from C3–C5 with instrumentation in good position. There was evidence of loss of lordosis at C5–C6 with disk dessication and broad-based bulging. The spinal cord had evidence of myelomalacia; this was noted when the patient was in rehabilitation, 1 month after injury. The 2-cm × 11-mm area of myelomalacia was directly posterior to the fused C3–C4 interval (original MRI, Figure 5; 2-week MRI, Figure 6).

 

 

Conclusion

At the time this player was injured, use of systemic hypothermia with standard therapy for acute SCI was unique and controversial. Since then, smaller randomized human studies have described the tolerable safety profile, efficacy, and potential benefits of this intervention in acute SCI in humans.8-10 Now, modest systemic hypothermia can be one of many tools considered in the treatment of acute SCI. Before it can become the standard of care, however, additional larger prospective randomized studies need to be completed.

Am J Orthop. 2017;46(2):E79-E82. Copyright Frontline Medical Communications Inc. 2017. All rights reserved.

References

1. Cappuccino A, Bisson LJ, Carpenter B, Marzo J, Dietrich WD 3rd, Cappuccino H. The use of systemic hypothermia for the treatment of an acute cervical spinal cord injury in a professional football player. Spine. 2010;35(2):E57-E62.

2. Goldstein J. Lowering body temp shows promise for trauma treatment. Spinal Cord Injury Information Pages news blog. http://www.sci-info-pages.com/2006/05/lowering-body-temp-shows-promise-for.html. Published May 3, 2006. Accessed March 19, 2009.

3. Hartemink KJ, Wisselink W, Rauwerda JA, Girbes AR, Polderman KH. Novel applications of therapeutic hypothermia: report of three cases. Crit Care. 2004;8(5):R343-R346.

4. Dietrich WD. Presidential address presented at: 34th Annual Meeting of the Cervical Spine Research Society; November 30, 2006; Palm Beach, FL.

5. Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(20):1405-1411.

6. Horodyski MB, LuCante K, Escobar E, et al. Intermittent Cool, Dry Air Underneath Football Shoulder Pads Assists in Temperature Homeostasis. In: The American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Proceedings 2008; 87-88.

7. Kleiner DM, Almquist JL, Bailes J, et al; Inter-Association Task Force for Appropriate Care of the Spine-Injured Athlete. Prehospital Care of the Spine-Injured Athlete. Dallas, TX: National Athletic Trainers’ Association; 2001. http://www.msata.org/Resources/Documents/PreHospitalCare4SpineInjuredAthlete.pdf. Published March 2001. Accessed January 10, 2017.

8. Dididze M, Green BA, Dietrich WD, Vanni S, Wang MY, Levi AD. Systemic hypothermia in acute cervical spinal cord injury: a case-controlled study. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(5):395-400.

9. Levi AD, Casella G, Green BA, et al. Clinical outcomes using modest intravascular hypothermia after acute cervical spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(4):670-677.

10. Levi AD, Green BA, Wang MY, et al. Clinical application of modest hypothermia after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26(3):407-415.

References

1. Cappuccino A, Bisson LJ, Carpenter B, Marzo J, Dietrich WD 3rd, Cappuccino H. The use of systemic hypothermia for the treatment of an acute cervical spinal cord injury in a professional football player. Spine. 2010;35(2):E57-E62.

2. Goldstein J. Lowering body temp shows promise for trauma treatment. Spinal Cord Injury Information Pages news blog. http://www.sci-info-pages.com/2006/05/lowering-body-temp-shows-promise-for.html. Published May 3, 2006. Accessed March 19, 2009.

3. Hartemink KJ, Wisselink W, Rauwerda JA, Girbes AR, Polderman KH. Novel applications of therapeutic hypothermia: report of three cases. Crit Care. 2004;8(5):R343-R346.

4. Dietrich WD. Presidential address presented at: 34th Annual Meeting of the Cervical Spine Research Society; November 30, 2006; Palm Beach, FL.

5. Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(20):1405-1411.

6. Horodyski MB, LuCante K, Escobar E, et al. Intermittent Cool, Dry Air Underneath Football Shoulder Pads Assists in Temperature Homeostasis. In: The American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Proceedings 2008; 87-88.

7. Kleiner DM, Almquist JL, Bailes J, et al; Inter-Association Task Force for Appropriate Care of the Spine-Injured Athlete. Prehospital Care of the Spine-Injured Athlete. Dallas, TX: National Athletic Trainers’ Association; 2001. http://www.msata.org/Resources/Documents/PreHospitalCare4SpineInjuredAthlete.pdf. Published March 2001. Accessed January 10, 2017.

8. Dididze M, Green BA, Dietrich WD, Vanni S, Wang MY, Levi AD. Systemic hypothermia in acute cervical spinal cord injury: a case-controlled study. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(5):395-400.

9. Levi AD, Casella G, Green BA, et al. Clinical outcomes using modest intravascular hypothermia after acute cervical spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(4):670-677.

10. Levi AD, Green BA, Wang MY, et al. Clinical application of modest hypothermia after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26(3):407-415.

Issue
The American Journal of Orthopedics - 46(2)
Issue
The American Journal of Orthopedics - 46(2)
Page Number
E79-E82
Page Number
E79-E82
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Systemic Hypothermia as Treatment for an Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in a Professional Football Player: 9-Year Follow-Up
Display Headline
Systemic Hypothermia as Treatment for an Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in a Professional Football Player: 9-Year Follow-Up
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Involuntary treatment symposia at APA

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 14:53

 

Involuntary treatment is an everyday event in the emergency department and on the inpatient unit, but, for both patients and advocates, it remains the most distressing and controversial aspect of psychiatric care. We all value medical autonomy, and, even when people may be too ill to make decisions about their own care, the issue of whether to force treatment gets sticky. On the other hand, the decision not to force someone to get care when they are very sick has its own risks and distresses, and sometimes groups clash.

If you don’t believe me, check outside the convention center during the upcoming American Psychiatric Association’s annual meeting in San Diego this May. Every year, there are protesters: antipsychiatry groups who feel our treatments offer more harm than good. For those who believe the field is sullied by the pharmaceutical companies and that the treatments are harmful, forcing those treatments upon people is all the more egregious. Most years, protesters come from the Church of Scientology and MindFreedom International to make their feelings known. The pitch of the protests varies, as does the length of time they stay, but, some years, there are marchers, megaphones, and jumbotrons.

Dr. Dinah Miller
Dr. Dinah Miller
I’ve spent the last few years talking with a wide variety of patients and professionals about their views on psychiatry and on involuntary care in particular. The culmination of that project was the publication of a book I wrote with forensic psychiatrist, Annette Hanson, MD, “Committed: The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care” (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016). With the battlefield defined, we’ve put together two symposia on involuntary care with presenters from around the country.

“The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care” will be held Wednesday, May 24, from 2 to 5 p.m. As the title suggests, the “combatants” will represent all sides. Roger Peele, MD, has been part of the APA’s governance since 1975. He will be traveling from Maryland to discuss why involuntary treatment is a good thing, an option that should be used more liberally with legislation that should be less restrictive. Former APA President Paul Appelbaum, MD, a forensic psychiatrist, will be coming from Columbia University in New York to talk about the APA’s stance on involuntary treatment over time.

On the other side of the debate, Elyn Saks, JD, PhD, will be talking about patient rights. Dr. Saks is the author of “The Center Cannot Hold: My Journey Through Madness” (New York: Hyperion, 2007), a memoir of her own experiences with treatment for schizophrenia. She is the founder of the Saks Institute for Mental Health Law, Policy, and Ethics at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles.

Finally, Al Galves, PhD, is on the board of directors of MindFreedom International, one of the groups that traditionally has picketed our meeting. He will be traveling from New Mexico to represent that group’s viewpoint. Dr. Galves also has a fascinating background: He holds degrees in government administration, as well as a doctorate in clinical psychology. He is the author of “Harness Your Dark Side: Mastering Jealousy, Rage, Frustration, and Other Negative Emotions” (Falls Hills, N.J.: New Horizon Press, 2012), and he has a long history of treatment for depression. I believe this is the first time that a member of MFI has spoken at an APA meeting.

Dr. Hanson will be the discussant who sums up what we learn from these diverse and esteemed speakers. I invite you to come for what is certain to be a lively symposium, but please leave your picket signs at the door. Our hope is not to fuel the battle but to provide an arena where diverse viewpoints can be expressed and heard. In our increasingly polarized world, we’d like to think that it is still possible to consider a variety of ideas without firing any artillery.

To add to the controversy, outpatient civil commitment continues to be held out as a panacea to get people treatment before they become dangerous. Still, each state handles outpatient care differently, if at all, so a symposium, “Outpatient Commitment: A Tour Across the States,” will be held on Tuesday, May 23, from 8 to 11 a.m. Two speakers will be coming from New York state, Ryan Bell, JD, MD, and Kimberly Butler, LCSW, MS, to talk about their experiences running an assisted outpatient treatment program in Rochester, N.Y. Erin Klekot, MD, will be talking about her experiences in Ohio. Adam Nelson, MD, will discuss the programs in California that are starting to be implemented.

Finally, Mustafa Mufti, MD, will be talking about the experience in Delaware, where they have had a great deal of experience with outpatient commitment – not without some contention – and where the state hospital and outpatient programs have been investigated by the Department of Justice. Our discussant will be Marvin Swartz, MD, from North Carolina. Dr. Swartz has coauthored the seminal studies on outpatient civil commitment results from both New York City and North Carolina.

If you’re coming to the APA, do join us. If not, both sessions are slated to be part of APA’s Meeting On Demand. Dr. Hanson will try to stream parts of the Battleground session on Periscope (wifi permitting) – follow her on Twitter if you’re interested in updates.

Finally, if you’d like to look up any session, either by topic or by presenter, the APA has provided a useful search function.

See you in San Diego!
 

 

 

To learn more about the latest book by Dr. Miller and Dr. Hanson, “Committed: The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care,” visit https://jhupbooks.press.jhu.edu/content/committed.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Involuntary treatment is an everyday event in the emergency department and on the inpatient unit, but, for both patients and advocates, it remains the most distressing and controversial aspect of psychiatric care. We all value medical autonomy, and, even when people may be too ill to make decisions about their own care, the issue of whether to force treatment gets sticky. On the other hand, the decision not to force someone to get care when they are very sick has its own risks and distresses, and sometimes groups clash.

If you don’t believe me, check outside the convention center during the upcoming American Psychiatric Association’s annual meeting in San Diego this May. Every year, there are protesters: antipsychiatry groups who feel our treatments offer more harm than good. For those who believe the field is sullied by the pharmaceutical companies and that the treatments are harmful, forcing those treatments upon people is all the more egregious. Most years, protesters come from the Church of Scientology and MindFreedom International to make their feelings known. The pitch of the protests varies, as does the length of time they stay, but, some years, there are marchers, megaphones, and jumbotrons.

Dr. Dinah Miller
Dr. Dinah Miller
I’ve spent the last few years talking with a wide variety of patients and professionals about their views on psychiatry and on involuntary care in particular. The culmination of that project was the publication of a book I wrote with forensic psychiatrist, Annette Hanson, MD, “Committed: The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care” (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016). With the battlefield defined, we’ve put together two symposia on involuntary care with presenters from around the country.

“The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care” will be held Wednesday, May 24, from 2 to 5 p.m. As the title suggests, the “combatants” will represent all sides. Roger Peele, MD, has been part of the APA’s governance since 1975. He will be traveling from Maryland to discuss why involuntary treatment is a good thing, an option that should be used more liberally with legislation that should be less restrictive. Former APA President Paul Appelbaum, MD, a forensic psychiatrist, will be coming from Columbia University in New York to talk about the APA’s stance on involuntary treatment over time.

On the other side of the debate, Elyn Saks, JD, PhD, will be talking about patient rights. Dr. Saks is the author of “The Center Cannot Hold: My Journey Through Madness” (New York: Hyperion, 2007), a memoir of her own experiences with treatment for schizophrenia. She is the founder of the Saks Institute for Mental Health Law, Policy, and Ethics at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles.

Finally, Al Galves, PhD, is on the board of directors of MindFreedom International, one of the groups that traditionally has picketed our meeting. He will be traveling from New Mexico to represent that group’s viewpoint. Dr. Galves also has a fascinating background: He holds degrees in government administration, as well as a doctorate in clinical psychology. He is the author of “Harness Your Dark Side: Mastering Jealousy, Rage, Frustration, and Other Negative Emotions” (Falls Hills, N.J.: New Horizon Press, 2012), and he has a long history of treatment for depression. I believe this is the first time that a member of MFI has spoken at an APA meeting.

Dr. Hanson will be the discussant who sums up what we learn from these diverse and esteemed speakers. I invite you to come for what is certain to be a lively symposium, but please leave your picket signs at the door. Our hope is not to fuel the battle but to provide an arena where diverse viewpoints can be expressed and heard. In our increasingly polarized world, we’d like to think that it is still possible to consider a variety of ideas without firing any artillery.

To add to the controversy, outpatient civil commitment continues to be held out as a panacea to get people treatment before they become dangerous. Still, each state handles outpatient care differently, if at all, so a symposium, “Outpatient Commitment: A Tour Across the States,” will be held on Tuesday, May 23, from 8 to 11 a.m. Two speakers will be coming from New York state, Ryan Bell, JD, MD, and Kimberly Butler, LCSW, MS, to talk about their experiences running an assisted outpatient treatment program in Rochester, N.Y. Erin Klekot, MD, will be talking about her experiences in Ohio. Adam Nelson, MD, will discuss the programs in California that are starting to be implemented.

Finally, Mustafa Mufti, MD, will be talking about the experience in Delaware, where they have had a great deal of experience with outpatient commitment – not without some contention – and where the state hospital and outpatient programs have been investigated by the Department of Justice. Our discussant will be Marvin Swartz, MD, from North Carolina. Dr. Swartz has coauthored the seminal studies on outpatient civil commitment results from both New York City and North Carolina.

If you’re coming to the APA, do join us. If not, both sessions are slated to be part of APA’s Meeting On Demand. Dr. Hanson will try to stream parts of the Battleground session on Periscope (wifi permitting) – follow her on Twitter if you’re interested in updates.

Finally, if you’d like to look up any session, either by topic or by presenter, the APA has provided a useful search function.

See you in San Diego!
 

 

 

To learn more about the latest book by Dr. Miller and Dr. Hanson, “Committed: The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care,” visit https://jhupbooks.press.jhu.edu/content/committed.

 

Involuntary treatment is an everyday event in the emergency department and on the inpatient unit, but, for both patients and advocates, it remains the most distressing and controversial aspect of psychiatric care. We all value medical autonomy, and, even when people may be too ill to make decisions about their own care, the issue of whether to force treatment gets sticky. On the other hand, the decision not to force someone to get care when they are very sick has its own risks and distresses, and sometimes groups clash.

If you don’t believe me, check outside the convention center during the upcoming American Psychiatric Association’s annual meeting in San Diego this May. Every year, there are protesters: antipsychiatry groups who feel our treatments offer more harm than good. For those who believe the field is sullied by the pharmaceutical companies and that the treatments are harmful, forcing those treatments upon people is all the more egregious. Most years, protesters come from the Church of Scientology and MindFreedom International to make their feelings known. The pitch of the protests varies, as does the length of time they stay, but, some years, there are marchers, megaphones, and jumbotrons.

Dr. Dinah Miller
Dr. Dinah Miller
I’ve spent the last few years talking with a wide variety of patients and professionals about their views on psychiatry and on involuntary care in particular. The culmination of that project was the publication of a book I wrote with forensic psychiatrist, Annette Hanson, MD, “Committed: The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care” (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016). With the battlefield defined, we’ve put together two symposia on involuntary care with presenters from around the country.

“The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care” will be held Wednesday, May 24, from 2 to 5 p.m. As the title suggests, the “combatants” will represent all sides. Roger Peele, MD, has been part of the APA’s governance since 1975. He will be traveling from Maryland to discuss why involuntary treatment is a good thing, an option that should be used more liberally with legislation that should be less restrictive. Former APA President Paul Appelbaum, MD, a forensic psychiatrist, will be coming from Columbia University in New York to talk about the APA’s stance on involuntary treatment over time.

On the other side of the debate, Elyn Saks, JD, PhD, will be talking about patient rights. Dr. Saks is the author of “The Center Cannot Hold: My Journey Through Madness” (New York: Hyperion, 2007), a memoir of her own experiences with treatment for schizophrenia. She is the founder of the Saks Institute for Mental Health Law, Policy, and Ethics at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles.

Finally, Al Galves, PhD, is on the board of directors of MindFreedom International, one of the groups that traditionally has picketed our meeting. He will be traveling from New Mexico to represent that group’s viewpoint. Dr. Galves also has a fascinating background: He holds degrees in government administration, as well as a doctorate in clinical psychology. He is the author of “Harness Your Dark Side: Mastering Jealousy, Rage, Frustration, and Other Negative Emotions” (Falls Hills, N.J.: New Horizon Press, 2012), and he has a long history of treatment for depression. I believe this is the first time that a member of MFI has spoken at an APA meeting.

Dr. Hanson will be the discussant who sums up what we learn from these diverse and esteemed speakers. I invite you to come for what is certain to be a lively symposium, but please leave your picket signs at the door. Our hope is not to fuel the battle but to provide an arena where diverse viewpoints can be expressed and heard. In our increasingly polarized world, we’d like to think that it is still possible to consider a variety of ideas without firing any artillery.

To add to the controversy, outpatient civil commitment continues to be held out as a panacea to get people treatment before they become dangerous. Still, each state handles outpatient care differently, if at all, so a symposium, “Outpatient Commitment: A Tour Across the States,” will be held on Tuesday, May 23, from 8 to 11 a.m. Two speakers will be coming from New York state, Ryan Bell, JD, MD, and Kimberly Butler, LCSW, MS, to talk about their experiences running an assisted outpatient treatment program in Rochester, N.Y. Erin Klekot, MD, will be talking about her experiences in Ohio. Adam Nelson, MD, will discuss the programs in California that are starting to be implemented.

Finally, Mustafa Mufti, MD, will be talking about the experience in Delaware, where they have had a great deal of experience with outpatient commitment – not without some contention – and where the state hospital and outpatient programs have been investigated by the Department of Justice. Our discussant will be Marvin Swartz, MD, from North Carolina. Dr. Swartz has coauthored the seminal studies on outpatient civil commitment results from both New York City and North Carolina.

If you’re coming to the APA, do join us. If not, both sessions are slated to be part of APA’s Meeting On Demand. Dr. Hanson will try to stream parts of the Battleground session on Periscope (wifi permitting) – follow her on Twitter if you’re interested in updates.

Finally, if you’d like to look up any session, either by topic or by presenter, the APA has provided a useful search function.

See you in San Diego!
 

 

 

To learn more about the latest book by Dr. Miller and Dr. Hanson, “Committed: The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care,” visit https://jhupbooks.press.jhu.edu/content/committed.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Tips from 'the father of modern networking'

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/14/2018 - 12:00

Ivan Misner once spent one week on Necker Island – the tony 74-acre island in the British Virgin Islands that is entirely owned by billionaire Sir Richard Branson – because he met a guy at a convention.

And Misner is really good at networking.

“I stayed in touch with the person, and when there was an opportunity, I got invited to this incredible ethics program on Necker where I had a chance to meet Sir Richard. It all comes from building relationships with people,” said Misner, founder and chairman of BNI (Business Network International), a 32-year-old global business networking platform based in Charlotte, N.C., that has led CNN to call him “the father of modern networking.”

Ivan Misner
One of HM17’s biggest draws will be the opportunity for hospitalists and other attendees to connect with their counterparts across the country. Sometimes it’s to broaden one’s network in the hopes of advancing on a career path. Other times it’s to get introduced to practice leaders in medical niches such as anticoagulation. Still other times it’s to be exposed to thought leaders, top researchers, and national power brokers who could provide access, insight, or both in the future.

The why doesn’t matter most, Misner said. A person’s approach to networking, regardless of the hoped-for outcome, should always remain the same.

“The two key themes that I would address would be the mindset and the skill set,” he said.

The mindset is making sure one’s approach doesn’t “feel artificial,” Misner said.

“A lot of people, when they go to some kind of networking environment, they feel like they need to get a shower afterwards and think, ‘Ick, I don’t like that,’” Misner said. “The best way to become an effective networker is to go to networking events with the idea of being willing to help people and really believe in that and practice that. I’ve been doing this a long time and where I see it done wrong is when people use face-to-face networking as a cold-calling opportunity.”

Instead, Misner suggests, approach networking like it is “more about farming than it is about hunting.” Cultivate relationships with time and tenacity and don’t just expect them to be instant. Once the approach is set, Misner has a process he calls VCP – visibility, credibility, and profitability.

“Credibility is what takes time,” he said. “You really want to build credibility with somebody. It doesn’t happen overnight. People have to get to know, like, and trust you. It is the most time consuming portion of the VCP process... then, and only then, can you get to profitability. Where people know who you are, they know what you do, they know you’re good at it, and they’re willing to refer a business to you. They’re willing to put you in touch with other people.”

But even when a relationship gets struck early on, networking must be more than a few minutes at an SHM conference, a local chapter mixer, or a medical school reunion.

It’s the follow-up that makes all the impact. Misner calls that process 24/7/30.

Within 24 hours, send the person a note. An email, or even the seemingly lost art of a hand-written card. (If your handwriting is sloppy, Misner often recommends services that will send out legible notes on your behalf.)

Within a week, connect on social media. Focus on whatever platform that person has on their business card, or email signature. Connect where they like to connect to show the person you’re willing to make the effort.

Within a month, reach out to the person and set a time to talk, either face-to-face or via a telecommunication service like Skype.

“It’s these touch points that you make with people that build the relationship,” Misner said. “Without building a real relationship, there is almost no value in the networking effort because you basically are just waiting to stumble upon opportunities as opposed to building relationships and opportunities. It has to be more than just bumping into somebody at a meeting... otherwise you’re really wasting your time.”

Misner also notes that the point of networking is collaboration at some point. That partnership could be working on a research paper or a pilot project. Or just even getting a phone call returned to talk about something important to you.

“It’s not what you know or who you know, it’s how well you know each other that really counts,” he added. “And meeting people at events like HM17 is only the start of the process. It’s not the end of the process by any means, if you want to do this well.”

Meeting/Event
Publications
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

Ivan Misner once spent one week on Necker Island – the tony 74-acre island in the British Virgin Islands that is entirely owned by billionaire Sir Richard Branson – because he met a guy at a convention.

And Misner is really good at networking.

“I stayed in touch with the person, and when there was an opportunity, I got invited to this incredible ethics program on Necker where I had a chance to meet Sir Richard. It all comes from building relationships with people,” said Misner, founder and chairman of BNI (Business Network International), a 32-year-old global business networking platform based in Charlotte, N.C., that has led CNN to call him “the father of modern networking.”

Ivan Misner
One of HM17’s biggest draws will be the opportunity for hospitalists and other attendees to connect with their counterparts across the country. Sometimes it’s to broaden one’s network in the hopes of advancing on a career path. Other times it’s to get introduced to practice leaders in medical niches such as anticoagulation. Still other times it’s to be exposed to thought leaders, top researchers, and national power brokers who could provide access, insight, or both in the future.

The why doesn’t matter most, Misner said. A person’s approach to networking, regardless of the hoped-for outcome, should always remain the same.

“The two key themes that I would address would be the mindset and the skill set,” he said.

The mindset is making sure one’s approach doesn’t “feel artificial,” Misner said.

“A lot of people, when they go to some kind of networking environment, they feel like they need to get a shower afterwards and think, ‘Ick, I don’t like that,’” Misner said. “The best way to become an effective networker is to go to networking events with the idea of being willing to help people and really believe in that and practice that. I’ve been doing this a long time and where I see it done wrong is when people use face-to-face networking as a cold-calling opportunity.”

Instead, Misner suggests, approach networking like it is “more about farming than it is about hunting.” Cultivate relationships with time and tenacity and don’t just expect them to be instant. Once the approach is set, Misner has a process he calls VCP – visibility, credibility, and profitability.

“Credibility is what takes time,” he said. “You really want to build credibility with somebody. It doesn’t happen overnight. People have to get to know, like, and trust you. It is the most time consuming portion of the VCP process... then, and only then, can you get to profitability. Where people know who you are, they know what you do, they know you’re good at it, and they’re willing to refer a business to you. They’re willing to put you in touch with other people.”

But even when a relationship gets struck early on, networking must be more than a few minutes at an SHM conference, a local chapter mixer, or a medical school reunion.

It’s the follow-up that makes all the impact. Misner calls that process 24/7/30.

Within 24 hours, send the person a note. An email, or even the seemingly lost art of a hand-written card. (If your handwriting is sloppy, Misner often recommends services that will send out legible notes on your behalf.)

Within a week, connect on social media. Focus on whatever platform that person has on their business card, or email signature. Connect where they like to connect to show the person you’re willing to make the effort.

Within a month, reach out to the person and set a time to talk, either face-to-face or via a telecommunication service like Skype.

“It’s these touch points that you make with people that build the relationship,” Misner said. “Without building a real relationship, there is almost no value in the networking effort because you basically are just waiting to stumble upon opportunities as opposed to building relationships and opportunities. It has to be more than just bumping into somebody at a meeting... otherwise you’re really wasting your time.”

Misner also notes that the point of networking is collaboration at some point. That partnership could be working on a research paper or a pilot project. Or just even getting a phone call returned to talk about something important to you.

“It’s not what you know or who you know, it’s how well you know each other that really counts,” he added. “And meeting people at events like HM17 is only the start of the process. It’s not the end of the process by any means, if you want to do this well.”

Ivan Misner once spent one week on Necker Island – the tony 74-acre island in the British Virgin Islands that is entirely owned by billionaire Sir Richard Branson – because he met a guy at a convention.

And Misner is really good at networking.

“I stayed in touch with the person, and when there was an opportunity, I got invited to this incredible ethics program on Necker where I had a chance to meet Sir Richard. It all comes from building relationships with people,” said Misner, founder and chairman of BNI (Business Network International), a 32-year-old global business networking platform based in Charlotte, N.C., that has led CNN to call him “the father of modern networking.”

Ivan Misner
One of HM17’s biggest draws will be the opportunity for hospitalists and other attendees to connect with their counterparts across the country. Sometimes it’s to broaden one’s network in the hopes of advancing on a career path. Other times it’s to get introduced to practice leaders in medical niches such as anticoagulation. Still other times it’s to be exposed to thought leaders, top researchers, and national power brokers who could provide access, insight, or both in the future.

The why doesn’t matter most, Misner said. A person’s approach to networking, regardless of the hoped-for outcome, should always remain the same.

“The two key themes that I would address would be the mindset and the skill set,” he said.

The mindset is making sure one’s approach doesn’t “feel artificial,” Misner said.

“A lot of people, when they go to some kind of networking environment, they feel like they need to get a shower afterwards and think, ‘Ick, I don’t like that,’” Misner said. “The best way to become an effective networker is to go to networking events with the idea of being willing to help people and really believe in that and practice that. I’ve been doing this a long time and where I see it done wrong is when people use face-to-face networking as a cold-calling opportunity.”

Instead, Misner suggests, approach networking like it is “more about farming than it is about hunting.” Cultivate relationships with time and tenacity and don’t just expect them to be instant. Once the approach is set, Misner has a process he calls VCP – visibility, credibility, and profitability.

“Credibility is what takes time,” he said. “You really want to build credibility with somebody. It doesn’t happen overnight. People have to get to know, like, and trust you. It is the most time consuming portion of the VCP process... then, and only then, can you get to profitability. Where people know who you are, they know what you do, they know you’re good at it, and they’re willing to refer a business to you. They’re willing to put you in touch with other people.”

But even when a relationship gets struck early on, networking must be more than a few minutes at an SHM conference, a local chapter mixer, or a medical school reunion.

It’s the follow-up that makes all the impact. Misner calls that process 24/7/30.

Within 24 hours, send the person a note. An email, or even the seemingly lost art of a hand-written card. (If your handwriting is sloppy, Misner often recommends services that will send out legible notes on your behalf.)

Within a week, connect on social media. Focus on whatever platform that person has on their business card, or email signature. Connect where they like to connect to show the person you’re willing to make the effort.

Within a month, reach out to the person and set a time to talk, either face-to-face or via a telecommunication service like Skype.

“It’s these touch points that you make with people that build the relationship,” Misner said. “Without building a real relationship, there is almost no value in the networking effort because you basically are just waiting to stumble upon opportunities as opposed to building relationships and opportunities. It has to be more than just bumping into somebody at a meeting... otherwise you’re really wasting your time.”

Misner also notes that the point of networking is collaboration at some point. That partnership could be working on a research paper or a pilot project. Or just even getting a phone call returned to talk about something important to you.

“It’s not what you know or who you know, it’s how well you know each other that really counts,” he added. “And meeting people at events like HM17 is only the start of the process. It’s not the end of the process by any means, if you want to do this well.”

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Transitioning from your current medical practice: an abbreviated step-by-step guide

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/14/2018 - 12:00

You have decided it is time to move on from your current hospital or medical group position and transition into a new role. While this decision is exciting and well-earned after years of hard work, it is critical that you make a plan and take specific steps to ensure that the transition is seamless.

The steps below are recommendations to make this process smoother.
 

Step 1: Determine how you are leaving the practice and your proposed timeline

Before anything else, you should decide how you are leaving your practice. Are you leaving the practice of medicine altogether, or are you simply leaving your current position for a different position elsewhere? This distinction will dictate what steps are necessary. Timing is also critical when leaving a practice, as it will dictate what steps should be taken and when. Having specific but realistic goals is imperative. Select a goal date for leaving the practice, but be aware that this goal may need to be adjusted.

Step 2: Create your team of advisers

Whether you are leaving your current practice or transitioning to a different position, it is extremely important to have the right individuals on your team. You should consider enlisting an attorney, a financial adviser, and an accountant to help facilitate the process. Enlisting lawyers with certain areas of expertise, such as in the areas of employment restrictive covenants, health care, or tax, may also be extremely beneficial and helpful throughout the process.

Steven M. Harris

Step 3: Review your current employment agreement

It is quite likely that at the onset of your current employment arrangement, you signed an employment agreement with your hospital or group. You will want to carefully review this agreement, as it may contain provisions that can affect the steps you should take before you leave your current practice and work elsewhere. These provisions include the following:

a) Noncompetition provisions

It is critical to determine whether or not there are any restrictive covenants in your employment agreement that limit where you can work after you transition from your current practice into a new role. Restrictive covenants include noncompetition and nonsolicitation provisions, and prohibit employees from working at certain places or in certain geographic areas after they leave their current place of employment. Rules surrounding restrictive covenants vary from state to state. If there are restrictive covenants in your agreement, be sure to understand the scope of the covenant, including the geographic and temporal scope, as well as the types of medicine you are prohibited from practicing. If the covenants seem too broad or unnecessarily restrictive, consult with an attorney, as overly broad or unduly burdensome covenants are often unenforceable. However, a state-by-state analysis is required.

b) Notice and termination provisions

It is important to review whether or not there are any notice requirements in your employment agreement, which may require you to notify your employer in advance of a departure. Make sure to comply with the time requirements in the notice provision to avoid a breach of the agreement. It is also critical to determine whether terminating an agreement early will result in any termination penalties. At times, employers will impose a penalty if an employee prematurely terminates a working relationship. Understanding the penalties associated with terminating your agreement will allow you to decide whether you want to cancel the agreement and pay the penalty or push back your timeline until the end of the agreement’s term to avoid termination fees.

Step 4: Licensure obligations

macrovector/Thinkstock
To comply with licensure requirements on your behalf, you will want to determine the license obligations in the state you practice. If you are leaving your hospital job to work in another state, you will want to determine whether you need to become licensed in that new state. If you are transitioning into a nonmedical role, you will want to determine whether you have to change your license status in the state where you are licensed.

Further, if your practice bills Medicare, you will want to file certain forms with Medicare to show that you are either changing your practice location or leaving medicine. For example, if you are leaving the hospital or group to practice elsewhere, you will need to fill out forms in order for your old group to submit claims and receive payments for Medicare services you provided while you were still part of that group. Furthermore, you will need to file reassignment forms to allow your new practice to bill on your behalf. Understanding which forms to complete can be confusing, so enlisting the help of a healthcare attorney may be worthwhile.
 

 

 

Step 5: Discuss your transition with your insurance representative

Even after you leave your current practice, you may be exposed to litigation for services you provided while you were employed or otherwise retained by such practice. To ensure that you are protected, discuss your insurance policy with your insurance representative. Review whether your insurance policy is “occurrence” or “claims-made.” If you have an occurrence policy, you are protected from covered incidents that occur during the policy period, regardless if your policy is still in existence. Claims-made policies only provide coverage for claims where both the incident and the claim occur during the policy period. For example, if you cancel your policy on March 1, and are sued on April 1 for an incident that allegedly occurred on Feb. 1, your claims-made insurance policy will not protect you. Therefore, it is important to analyze your policies to determine if tail insurance is needed.

There are a number of other issues you will want to address before you leave your practice, including financial responsibilities and medical record and privacy obligations. To ensure that you leave your practice properly, you should contact an experienced lawyer who can help you navigate this process.
 

Steven M. Harris is a nationally recognized health care attorney and a member of the law firm McDonald Hopkins LLC in Chicago. Write to him at [email protected].

Publications
Topics
Sections

You have decided it is time to move on from your current hospital or medical group position and transition into a new role. While this decision is exciting and well-earned after years of hard work, it is critical that you make a plan and take specific steps to ensure that the transition is seamless.

The steps below are recommendations to make this process smoother.
 

Step 1: Determine how you are leaving the practice and your proposed timeline

Before anything else, you should decide how you are leaving your practice. Are you leaving the practice of medicine altogether, or are you simply leaving your current position for a different position elsewhere? This distinction will dictate what steps are necessary. Timing is also critical when leaving a practice, as it will dictate what steps should be taken and when. Having specific but realistic goals is imperative. Select a goal date for leaving the practice, but be aware that this goal may need to be adjusted.

Step 2: Create your team of advisers

Whether you are leaving your current practice or transitioning to a different position, it is extremely important to have the right individuals on your team. You should consider enlisting an attorney, a financial adviser, and an accountant to help facilitate the process. Enlisting lawyers with certain areas of expertise, such as in the areas of employment restrictive covenants, health care, or tax, may also be extremely beneficial and helpful throughout the process.

Steven M. Harris

Step 3: Review your current employment agreement

It is quite likely that at the onset of your current employment arrangement, you signed an employment agreement with your hospital or group. You will want to carefully review this agreement, as it may contain provisions that can affect the steps you should take before you leave your current practice and work elsewhere. These provisions include the following:

a) Noncompetition provisions

It is critical to determine whether or not there are any restrictive covenants in your employment agreement that limit where you can work after you transition from your current practice into a new role. Restrictive covenants include noncompetition and nonsolicitation provisions, and prohibit employees from working at certain places or in certain geographic areas after they leave their current place of employment. Rules surrounding restrictive covenants vary from state to state. If there are restrictive covenants in your agreement, be sure to understand the scope of the covenant, including the geographic and temporal scope, as well as the types of medicine you are prohibited from practicing. If the covenants seem too broad or unnecessarily restrictive, consult with an attorney, as overly broad or unduly burdensome covenants are often unenforceable. However, a state-by-state analysis is required.

b) Notice and termination provisions

It is important to review whether or not there are any notice requirements in your employment agreement, which may require you to notify your employer in advance of a departure. Make sure to comply with the time requirements in the notice provision to avoid a breach of the agreement. It is also critical to determine whether terminating an agreement early will result in any termination penalties. At times, employers will impose a penalty if an employee prematurely terminates a working relationship. Understanding the penalties associated with terminating your agreement will allow you to decide whether you want to cancel the agreement and pay the penalty or push back your timeline until the end of the agreement’s term to avoid termination fees.

Step 4: Licensure obligations

macrovector/Thinkstock
To comply with licensure requirements on your behalf, you will want to determine the license obligations in the state you practice. If you are leaving your hospital job to work in another state, you will want to determine whether you need to become licensed in that new state. If you are transitioning into a nonmedical role, you will want to determine whether you have to change your license status in the state where you are licensed.

Further, if your practice bills Medicare, you will want to file certain forms with Medicare to show that you are either changing your practice location or leaving medicine. For example, if you are leaving the hospital or group to practice elsewhere, you will need to fill out forms in order for your old group to submit claims and receive payments for Medicare services you provided while you were still part of that group. Furthermore, you will need to file reassignment forms to allow your new practice to bill on your behalf. Understanding which forms to complete can be confusing, so enlisting the help of a healthcare attorney may be worthwhile.
 

 

 

Step 5: Discuss your transition with your insurance representative

Even after you leave your current practice, you may be exposed to litigation for services you provided while you were employed or otherwise retained by such practice. To ensure that you are protected, discuss your insurance policy with your insurance representative. Review whether your insurance policy is “occurrence” or “claims-made.” If you have an occurrence policy, you are protected from covered incidents that occur during the policy period, regardless if your policy is still in existence. Claims-made policies only provide coverage for claims where both the incident and the claim occur during the policy period. For example, if you cancel your policy on March 1, and are sued on April 1 for an incident that allegedly occurred on Feb. 1, your claims-made insurance policy will not protect you. Therefore, it is important to analyze your policies to determine if tail insurance is needed.

There are a number of other issues you will want to address before you leave your practice, including financial responsibilities and medical record and privacy obligations. To ensure that you leave your practice properly, you should contact an experienced lawyer who can help you navigate this process.
 

Steven M. Harris is a nationally recognized health care attorney and a member of the law firm McDonald Hopkins LLC in Chicago. Write to him at [email protected].

You have decided it is time to move on from your current hospital or medical group position and transition into a new role. While this decision is exciting and well-earned after years of hard work, it is critical that you make a plan and take specific steps to ensure that the transition is seamless.

The steps below are recommendations to make this process smoother.
 

Step 1: Determine how you are leaving the practice and your proposed timeline

Before anything else, you should decide how you are leaving your practice. Are you leaving the practice of medicine altogether, or are you simply leaving your current position for a different position elsewhere? This distinction will dictate what steps are necessary. Timing is also critical when leaving a practice, as it will dictate what steps should be taken and when. Having specific but realistic goals is imperative. Select a goal date for leaving the practice, but be aware that this goal may need to be adjusted.

Step 2: Create your team of advisers

Whether you are leaving your current practice or transitioning to a different position, it is extremely important to have the right individuals on your team. You should consider enlisting an attorney, a financial adviser, and an accountant to help facilitate the process. Enlisting lawyers with certain areas of expertise, such as in the areas of employment restrictive covenants, health care, or tax, may also be extremely beneficial and helpful throughout the process.

Steven M. Harris

Step 3: Review your current employment agreement

It is quite likely that at the onset of your current employment arrangement, you signed an employment agreement with your hospital or group. You will want to carefully review this agreement, as it may contain provisions that can affect the steps you should take before you leave your current practice and work elsewhere. These provisions include the following:

a) Noncompetition provisions

It is critical to determine whether or not there are any restrictive covenants in your employment agreement that limit where you can work after you transition from your current practice into a new role. Restrictive covenants include noncompetition and nonsolicitation provisions, and prohibit employees from working at certain places or in certain geographic areas after they leave their current place of employment. Rules surrounding restrictive covenants vary from state to state. If there are restrictive covenants in your agreement, be sure to understand the scope of the covenant, including the geographic and temporal scope, as well as the types of medicine you are prohibited from practicing. If the covenants seem too broad or unnecessarily restrictive, consult with an attorney, as overly broad or unduly burdensome covenants are often unenforceable. However, a state-by-state analysis is required.

b) Notice and termination provisions

It is important to review whether or not there are any notice requirements in your employment agreement, which may require you to notify your employer in advance of a departure. Make sure to comply with the time requirements in the notice provision to avoid a breach of the agreement. It is also critical to determine whether terminating an agreement early will result in any termination penalties. At times, employers will impose a penalty if an employee prematurely terminates a working relationship. Understanding the penalties associated with terminating your agreement will allow you to decide whether you want to cancel the agreement and pay the penalty or push back your timeline until the end of the agreement’s term to avoid termination fees.

Step 4: Licensure obligations

macrovector/Thinkstock
To comply with licensure requirements on your behalf, you will want to determine the license obligations in the state you practice. If you are leaving your hospital job to work in another state, you will want to determine whether you need to become licensed in that new state. If you are transitioning into a nonmedical role, you will want to determine whether you have to change your license status in the state where you are licensed.

Further, if your practice bills Medicare, you will want to file certain forms with Medicare to show that you are either changing your practice location or leaving medicine. For example, if you are leaving the hospital or group to practice elsewhere, you will need to fill out forms in order for your old group to submit claims and receive payments for Medicare services you provided while you were still part of that group. Furthermore, you will need to file reassignment forms to allow your new practice to bill on your behalf. Understanding which forms to complete can be confusing, so enlisting the help of a healthcare attorney may be worthwhile.
 

 

 

Step 5: Discuss your transition with your insurance representative

Even after you leave your current practice, you may be exposed to litigation for services you provided while you were employed or otherwise retained by such practice. To ensure that you are protected, discuss your insurance policy with your insurance representative. Review whether your insurance policy is “occurrence” or “claims-made.” If you have an occurrence policy, you are protected from covered incidents that occur during the policy period, regardless if your policy is still in existence. Claims-made policies only provide coverage for claims where both the incident and the claim occur during the policy period. For example, if you cancel your policy on March 1, and are sued on April 1 for an incident that allegedly occurred on Feb. 1, your claims-made insurance policy will not protect you. Therefore, it is important to analyze your policies to determine if tail insurance is needed.

There are a number of other issues you will want to address before you leave your practice, including financial responsibilities and medical record and privacy obligations. To ensure that you leave your practice properly, you should contact an experienced lawyer who can help you navigate this process.
 

Steven M. Harris is a nationally recognized health care attorney and a member of the law firm McDonald Hopkins LLC in Chicago. Write to him at [email protected].

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Antibodies Part 3: In whose corner is genome editing’s best cut-man sitting?

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 14:53

 

We are in the midst of a revolution in genome editing. Science now exists in “AC,” or after CRISPR. Able to speedily and efficiently make genomic cuts with surgical precision, CRISPR/Cas9 is used almost ubiquitously now in the scientific community to study and alter DNA across fields ranging from medicine to agriculture to zoology. The possibilities of the biological and therapeutic implications are seemingly endless, as are the important ethical implications of their impact. Likely because of the latter, CRISPR technology has made its way from publications like Science and Nature into the lay public domains of Newsweek and NBC News.

In fact, CRISPR technology made its way into one of my favorite podcasts, WNYC’s “Radio Lab” in June 20151. The episode was entitled “Antibodies Part 1,” perhaps assuming that other technologies would also be discussed later although that has never happened. Actually, in an update early this year, the podcast jokingly addressed never moving on to “Part 2,” then followed with an update on how far CRISPR technology has progressed. Putting aside the technological advances and the early clinical applications, as well as the immense ethical considerations, CRISPR technology faces a new controversy, not one from a white coat but rather from a black robe.

Dr. Aaron Viny
This past December, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) heard testimony over a CRISPR patent dispute, which centered on Jennifer Doudna, PhD, at the University of California, Berkeley, and Feng Zhang, PhD, at the Broad Institute, Cambridge, Mass. Both investigators have pioneered using the CRISPR/Cas9 system in their respective published work and each of their institutions have applied for patents to protect the application of the technology for scientific and therapeutic applications.

In her CommonHealth blog2, Carey Goldberg of WBUR Boston Public Radio compared the case with the bout between undefeated Muhammad Ali and undefeated Joe Frazier at New York’s Madison Square Garden. Both men had legitimate claims to the title of World Heavyweight Champion. What transpired is now known as the “Fight of the Century.”

The analogy is apt. Boxing is about speed and control. Ali dominated the first three rounds with his jab, a punch that is both offensive with its attack and defensive in keeping one’s opponent at a distance. Dr. Doudna and her collaborator Emmanuelle Charpentier, PhD, published their work first (Science. 2012 Aug 17;337[6096]:816-21)3. UC Berkeley filed their patent first in May 2012.

Boxing is about timing and opportunity. Under the barrage of Ali’s jabs, Frazier found an inside position and caught Ali with a left hook. Dr. Zhang’s work followed closely after but had previously applied the technology in murine and human cells (Science. 2013 Feb 15; 339[6121]:819-23)4. The Broad Institute used this key difference to apply for its own patents under expedited review, which were granted in April 2014.

Boxing is about a punch and a counterpunch. Though fatigued, Ali continued to connect with combination punches. Frazier’s left hook pummeled Ali’s jaw. UC Berkeley filed an interference motion to invalidate the Broad Institute patent claim on the basis that the extension to eukaryotic cells was “obvious” based on the published work by Dr. Doudna’s group. In February, USPTO ruled that the Broad patent application may proceed, citing “patentably distinct subject matter.” Initial reports had indicated that Berkeley may appeal the decision, but no official filings have been made public.

Like the Fight of the Century, this case may go the distance and be decided by the judges. In a unanimous decision, Joe Frazier won the first of three epic bouts. The final scorecard is not known in the patent disputes; on March 28, the European Patent Office announced it will grant the patent application on behalf of Dr. Doudna and Dr. Charpentier.

Much like a prizefight, Wall Street has also been taking bets on who will prevail, with CRISPR-based biotech backing both sides mirroring the mid-bout odds, just as Ali dominated early with the jab, until Frazier evened the match with a left hook to the jaw. Ali fell to his knee on the canvas in the 11th round; will the European Patent Office decision prove to be a slip or a decisive knockdown? With so much at stake, the only assurance is that, as with the Ali-Frazier bout, there is likely more fighting to be done.

References:

1. Radio Lab

2. CommonHealth blog

3. Jinek M, et al., A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012 Aug 17;337(6096):816-21.

4. Le Cong et al., Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas Systems. Science. 2013 Feb 15;339(6121):819-23. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas Systems.

Science. 2017 Feb 15: Round one of CRISPR patent legal battle goes to the Broad Institute.

StreetInsider.com: CRISPR Therapeutics (CRSP) says EPO to grant CRISPR/Cas gene editing patent.
 

 

 

Dr. Viny is with the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, N.Y., where he is a clinical instructor, is on the staff of the leukemia service, and is a clinical researcher in the Ross Levine Lab. Contact Dr. Viny at [email protected].

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

We are in the midst of a revolution in genome editing. Science now exists in “AC,” or after CRISPR. Able to speedily and efficiently make genomic cuts with surgical precision, CRISPR/Cas9 is used almost ubiquitously now in the scientific community to study and alter DNA across fields ranging from medicine to agriculture to zoology. The possibilities of the biological and therapeutic implications are seemingly endless, as are the important ethical implications of their impact. Likely because of the latter, CRISPR technology has made its way from publications like Science and Nature into the lay public domains of Newsweek and NBC News.

In fact, CRISPR technology made its way into one of my favorite podcasts, WNYC’s “Radio Lab” in June 20151. The episode was entitled “Antibodies Part 1,” perhaps assuming that other technologies would also be discussed later although that has never happened. Actually, in an update early this year, the podcast jokingly addressed never moving on to “Part 2,” then followed with an update on how far CRISPR technology has progressed. Putting aside the technological advances and the early clinical applications, as well as the immense ethical considerations, CRISPR technology faces a new controversy, not one from a white coat but rather from a black robe.

Dr. Aaron Viny
This past December, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) heard testimony over a CRISPR patent dispute, which centered on Jennifer Doudna, PhD, at the University of California, Berkeley, and Feng Zhang, PhD, at the Broad Institute, Cambridge, Mass. Both investigators have pioneered using the CRISPR/Cas9 system in their respective published work and each of their institutions have applied for patents to protect the application of the technology for scientific and therapeutic applications.

In her CommonHealth blog2, Carey Goldberg of WBUR Boston Public Radio compared the case with the bout between undefeated Muhammad Ali and undefeated Joe Frazier at New York’s Madison Square Garden. Both men had legitimate claims to the title of World Heavyweight Champion. What transpired is now known as the “Fight of the Century.”

The analogy is apt. Boxing is about speed and control. Ali dominated the first three rounds with his jab, a punch that is both offensive with its attack and defensive in keeping one’s opponent at a distance. Dr. Doudna and her collaborator Emmanuelle Charpentier, PhD, published their work first (Science. 2012 Aug 17;337[6096]:816-21)3. UC Berkeley filed their patent first in May 2012.

Boxing is about timing and opportunity. Under the barrage of Ali’s jabs, Frazier found an inside position and caught Ali with a left hook. Dr. Zhang’s work followed closely after but had previously applied the technology in murine and human cells (Science. 2013 Feb 15; 339[6121]:819-23)4. The Broad Institute used this key difference to apply for its own patents under expedited review, which were granted in April 2014.

Boxing is about a punch and a counterpunch. Though fatigued, Ali continued to connect with combination punches. Frazier’s left hook pummeled Ali’s jaw. UC Berkeley filed an interference motion to invalidate the Broad Institute patent claim on the basis that the extension to eukaryotic cells was “obvious” based on the published work by Dr. Doudna’s group. In February, USPTO ruled that the Broad patent application may proceed, citing “patentably distinct subject matter.” Initial reports had indicated that Berkeley may appeal the decision, but no official filings have been made public.

Like the Fight of the Century, this case may go the distance and be decided by the judges. In a unanimous decision, Joe Frazier won the first of three epic bouts. The final scorecard is not known in the patent disputes; on March 28, the European Patent Office announced it will grant the patent application on behalf of Dr. Doudna and Dr. Charpentier.

Much like a prizefight, Wall Street has also been taking bets on who will prevail, with CRISPR-based biotech backing both sides mirroring the mid-bout odds, just as Ali dominated early with the jab, until Frazier evened the match with a left hook to the jaw. Ali fell to his knee on the canvas in the 11th round; will the European Patent Office decision prove to be a slip or a decisive knockdown? With so much at stake, the only assurance is that, as with the Ali-Frazier bout, there is likely more fighting to be done.

References:

1. Radio Lab

2. CommonHealth blog

3. Jinek M, et al., A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012 Aug 17;337(6096):816-21.

4. Le Cong et al., Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas Systems. Science. 2013 Feb 15;339(6121):819-23. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas Systems.

Science. 2017 Feb 15: Round one of CRISPR patent legal battle goes to the Broad Institute.

StreetInsider.com: CRISPR Therapeutics (CRSP) says EPO to grant CRISPR/Cas gene editing patent.
 

 

 

Dr. Viny is with the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, N.Y., where he is a clinical instructor, is on the staff of the leukemia service, and is a clinical researcher in the Ross Levine Lab. Contact Dr. Viny at [email protected].

 

We are in the midst of a revolution in genome editing. Science now exists in “AC,” or after CRISPR. Able to speedily and efficiently make genomic cuts with surgical precision, CRISPR/Cas9 is used almost ubiquitously now in the scientific community to study and alter DNA across fields ranging from medicine to agriculture to zoology. The possibilities of the biological and therapeutic implications are seemingly endless, as are the important ethical implications of their impact. Likely because of the latter, CRISPR technology has made its way from publications like Science and Nature into the lay public domains of Newsweek and NBC News.

In fact, CRISPR technology made its way into one of my favorite podcasts, WNYC’s “Radio Lab” in June 20151. The episode was entitled “Antibodies Part 1,” perhaps assuming that other technologies would also be discussed later although that has never happened. Actually, in an update early this year, the podcast jokingly addressed never moving on to “Part 2,” then followed with an update on how far CRISPR technology has progressed. Putting aside the technological advances and the early clinical applications, as well as the immense ethical considerations, CRISPR technology faces a new controversy, not one from a white coat but rather from a black robe.

Dr. Aaron Viny
This past December, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) heard testimony over a CRISPR patent dispute, which centered on Jennifer Doudna, PhD, at the University of California, Berkeley, and Feng Zhang, PhD, at the Broad Institute, Cambridge, Mass. Both investigators have pioneered using the CRISPR/Cas9 system in their respective published work and each of their institutions have applied for patents to protect the application of the technology for scientific and therapeutic applications.

In her CommonHealth blog2, Carey Goldberg of WBUR Boston Public Radio compared the case with the bout between undefeated Muhammad Ali and undefeated Joe Frazier at New York’s Madison Square Garden. Both men had legitimate claims to the title of World Heavyweight Champion. What transpired is now known as the “Fight of the Century.”

The analogy is apt. Boxing is about speed and control. Ali dominated the first three rounds with his jab, a punch that is both offensive with its attack and defensive in keeping one’s opponent at a distance. Dr. Doudna and her collaborator Emmanuelle Charpentier, PhD, published their work first (Science. 2012 Aug 17;337[6096]:816-21)3. UC Berkeley filed their patent first in May 2012.

Boxing is about timing and opportunity. Under the barrage of Ali’s jabs, Frazier found an inside position and caught Ali with a left hook. Dr. Zhang’s work followed closely after but had previously applied the technology in murine and human cells (Science. 2013 Feb 15; 339[6121]:819-23)4. The Broad Institute used this key difference to apply for its own patents under expedited review, which were granted in April 2014.

Boxing is about a punch and a counterpunch. Though fatigued, Ali continued to connect with combination punches. Frazier’s left hook pummeled Ali’s jaw. UC Berkeley filed an interference motion to invalidate the Broad Institute patent claim on the basis that the extension to eukaryotic cells was “obvious” based on the published work by Dr. Doudna’s group. In February, USPTO ruled that the Broad patent application may proceed, citing “patentably distinct subject matter.” Initial reports had indicated that Berkeley may appeal the decision, but no official filings have been made public.

Like the Fight of the Century, this case may go the distance and be decided by the judges. In a unanimous decision, Joe Frazier won the first of three epic bouts. The final scorecard is not known in the patent disputes; on March 28, the European Patent Office announced it will grant the patent application on behalf of Dr. Doudna and Dr. Charpentier.

Much like a prizefight, Wall Street has also been taking bets on who will prevail, with CRISPR-based biotech backing both sides mirroring the mid-bout odds, just as Ali dominated early with the jab, until Frazier evened the match with a left hook to the jaw. Ali fell to his knee on the canvas in the 11th round; will the European Patent Office decision prove to be a slip or a decisive knockdown? With so much at stake, the only assurance is that, as with the Ali-Frazier bout, there is likely more fighting to be done.

References:

1. Radio Lab

2. CommonHealth blog

3. Jinek M, et al., A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012 Aug 17;337(6096):816-21.

4. Le Cong et al., Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas Systems. Science. 2013 Feb 15;339(6121):819-23. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas Systems.

Science. 2017 Feb 15: Round one of CRISPR patent legal battle goes to the Broad Institute.

StreetInsider.com: CRISPR Therapeutics (CRSP) says EPO to grant CRISPR/Cas gene editing patent.
 

 

 

Dr. Viny is with the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, N.Y., where he is a clinical instructor, is on the staff of the leukemia service, and is a clinical researcher in the Ross Levine Lab. Contact Dr. Viny at [email protected].

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME