Micrograph showing DLBCL

 

Results of a phase 3 study suggest that obinutuzumab may not confer a benefit over standard therapy in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

The data showed that obinutuzumab plus CHOP chemotherapy does not improve progression-free survival (PFS) in DLBCL patients, when compared to rituximab plus CHOP.

Adverse events with both treatment regimens were consistent with those seen in previous clinical trials, according to Genentech and Biogen, the companies developing obinutuzumab.

The companies have not released any data from this trial, known as GOYA, but they said results will be presented at an upcoming medical meeting.

“Two previous studies showed [obinutuzumab] helped people with previously untreated follicular lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia live longer without their disease worsening compared to [rituximab], when each was combined with chemotherapy,” said Sandra Horning, MD, chief medical officer and head of global product development at Genentech.

“We were hopeful we could show a similar result for people with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and once again improve on the standard of care. We will continue to analyze the GOYA data to better understand the results, and to study other investigational treatments in this disease with the goal of further helping these patients.”

The GOYA trial enrolled 1418 previously untreated patients with CD20-positive DLBCL. The patients were randomized to receive obinutuzumab at 1000 mg every 21 days or rituximab at 375 mg/m² every 21 days for 8 cycles, in addition to 6 to 8 cycles of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) every 21 days.

The primary endpoint of the study is investigator-assessed PFS, with secondary endpoints including PFS assessed by an independent review committee, response rate, overall survival, disease-free survival, and safety profile.

Obinutuzumab is an engineered monoclonal antibody designed to attach to CD20, a protein found on certain B cells. The drug is thought to work by attacking targeted cells both directly and together with the immune system.

In the US and the European Union (EU), obinutuzumab is approved for use in combination with chlorambucil to treat adults with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Obinutuzumab is also approved in the US and the EU to treat patients with follicular lymphoma. The drug can be given, first in combination with bendamustine and then alone as maintenance therapy, to adults with follicular lymphoma who did not respond to a rituximab-containing regimen or whose disease returned after such treatment.

Obinutuzumab is marketed as Gazyvaro in the EU and Switzerland and Gazyva in the rest of the world.

 

 

Micrograph showing DLBCL

 

Results of a phase 3 study suggest that obinutuzumab may not confer a benefit over standard therapy in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

The data showed that obinutuzumab plus CHOP chemotherapy does not improve progression-free survival (PFS) in DLBCL patients, when compared to rituximab plus CHOP.

Adverse events with both treatment regimens were consistent with those seen in previous clinical trials, according to Genentech and Biogen, the companies developing obinutuzumab.

The companies have not released any data from this trial, known as GOYA, but they said results will be presented at an upcoming medical meeting.

“Two previous studies showed [obinutuzumab] helped people with previously untreated follicular lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia live longer without their disease worsening compared to [rituximab], when each was combined with chemotherapy,” said Sandra Horning, MD, chief medical officer and head of global product development at Genentech.

“We were hopeful we could show a similar result for people with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and once again improve on the standard of care. We will continue to analyze the GOYA data to better understand the results, and to study other investigational treatments in this disease with the goal of further helping these patients.”

The GOYA trial enrolled 1418 previously untreated patients with CD20-positive DLBCL. The patients were randomized to receive obinutuzumab at 1000 mg every 21 days or rituximab at 375 mg/m² every 21 days for 8 cycles, in addition to 6 to 8 cycles of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) every 21 days.

The primary endpoint of the study is investigator-assessed PFS, with secondary endpoints including PFS assessed by an independent review committee, response rate, overall survival, disease-free survival, and safety profile.

Obinutuzumab is an engineered monoclonal antibody designed to attach to CD20, a protein found on certain B cells. The drug is thought to work by attacking targeted cells both directly and together with the immune system.

In the US and the European Union (EU), obinutuzumab is approved for use in combination with chlorambucil to treat adults with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Obinutuzumab is also approved in the US and the EU to treat patients with follicular lymphoma. The drug can be given, first in combination with bendamustine and then alone as maintenance therapy, to adults with follicular lymphoma who did not respond to a rituximab-containing regimen or whose disease returned after such treatment.

Obinutuzumab is marketed as Gazyvaro in the EU and Switzerland and Gazyva in the rest of the world.

 

 

Micrograph showing DLBCL

 

Results of a phase 3 study suggest that obinutuzumab may not confer a benefit over standard therapy in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

The data showed that obinutuzumab plus CHOP chemotherapy does not improve progression-free survival (PFS) in DLBCL patients, when compared to rituximab plus CHOP.

Adverse events with both treatment regimens were consistent with those seen in previous clinical trials, according to Genentech and Biogen, the companies developing obinutuzumab.

The companies have not released any data from this trial, known as GOYA, but they said results will be presented at an upcoming medical meeting.

“Two previous studies showed [obinutuzumab] helped people with previously untreated follicular lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia live longer without their disease worsening compared to [rituximab], when each was combined with chemotherapy,” said Sandra Horning, MD, chief medical officer and head of global product development at Genentech.

“We were hopeful we could show a similar result for people with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and once again improve on the standard of care. We will continue to analyze the GOYA data to better understand the results, and to study other investigational treatments in this disease with the goal of further helping these patients.”

The GOYA trial enrolled 1418 previously untreated patients with CD20-positive DLBCL. The patients were randomized to receive obinutuzumab at 1000 mg every 21 days or rituximab at 375 mg/m² every 21 days for 8 cycles, in addition to 6 to 8 cycles of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) every 21 days.

The primary endpoint of the study is investigator-assessed PFS, with secondary endpoints including PFS assessed by an independent review committee, response rate, overall survival, disease-free survival, and safety profile.

Obinutuzumab is an engineered monoclonal antibody designed to attach to CD20, a protein found on certain B cells. The drug is thought to work by attacking targeted cells both directly and together with the immune system.

In the US and the European Union (EU), obinutuzumab is approved for use in combination with chlorambucil to treat adults with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Obinutuzumab is also approved in the US and the EU to treat patients with follicular lymphoma. The drug can be given, first in combination with bendamustine and then alone as maintenance therapy, to adults with follicular lymphoma who did not respond to a rituximab-containing regimen or whose disease returned after such treatment.

Obinutuzumab is marketed as Gazyvaro in the EU and Switzerland and Gazyva in the rest of the world.

Donated blood

Photo courtesy of UAB Hospital

SAN DIEGO—Blood management guidelines can save millions of dollars and drastically reduce the waste of donated blood, according to a group of investigators.

A team at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee, developed blood utilization practice guidelines that resulted in $2 million in savings and a 30% reduction in blood use from 2011 to 2015.

The investigators presented these results in a poster at the 2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP®) Conference.

“The transfusion committee at Vanderbilt was interested in evaluating how we could implement evidence-based guidelines around restrictive transfusion,” said investigator Barbara J. Martin, RN.

To that end, the team first decided to change the standard practice of ordering 2 units of blood per patient. The investigators modified the medical center’s computerized provider order entry system to allow for blood ordering to be based on a specific assessment of each case, rather than a standard order of 2 units.

This change reduced red blood cell transfusions by more than 30%—from 675 units per 1000 discharges in 2011 to 432 units per 1000 discharges in 2015.

The investigators also noted that, for general and vascular surgery patients who underwent NSQIP- targeted procedures—including colectomy, proctectomy, ventral hernia, and appendectomy—between 5% and 6% were transfused with an average of 2.4 units of blood per patient in 2015.

In comparison, 11% of such patients were transfused with an average of 4.6 units of blood per patient in 2011.

“We found that, in that particular population, many of whom are transfused for acute blood loss, we still saw a significant decrease in the number of units transfused into the patient,” Martin said.

In addition to addressing blood utilization, the investigators developed guidelines to reduce waste. These guidelines state that, when more than 1 unit of blood is ordered, it must be sent in a cooler rather than the pneumatic tube. Coolers were reconfigured to optimize temperature management.

Furthermore, a specific member of the staff is tasked with “ownership” of the blood products, including returning unused product to the blood bank. Finally, individual unit wastage is reported to clinical leaders for review, and aggregate data are reported monthly.

The use of these guidelines resulted in fewer than 80 units of blood being wasted in 2015, down from 300 units in 2011.

Martin said the guidelines she and her colleagues developed could easily be implemented at other medical centers.

“Blood is a limited resource,” she noted, “and we have a responsibility as a healthcare provider to optimize the use of a resource that is difficult to get and only available through altruistic donations.”

Donated blood

Photo courtesy of UAB Hospital

SAN DIEGO—Blood management guidelines can save millions of dollars and drastically reduce the waste of donated blood, according to a group of investigators.

A team at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee, developed blood utilization practice guidelines that resulted in $2 million in savings and a 30% reduction in blood use from 2011 to 2015.

The investigators presented these results in a poster at the 2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP®) Conference.

“The transfusion committee at Vanderbilt was interested in evaluating how we could implement evidence-based guidelines around restrictive transfusion,” said investigator Barbara J. Martin, RN.

To that end, the team first decided to change the standard practice of ordering 2 units of blood per patient. The investigators modified the medical center’s computerized provider order entry system to allow for blood ordering to be based on a specific assessment of each case, rather than a standard order of 2 units.

This change reduced red blood cell transfusions by more than 30%—from 675 units per 1000 discharges in 2011 to 432 units per 1000 discharges in 2015.

The investigators also noted that, for general and vascular surgery patients who underwent NSQIP- targeted procedures—including colectomy, proctectomy, ventral hernia, and appendectomy—between 5% and 6% were transfused with an average of 2.4 units of blood per patient in 2015.

In comparison, 11% of such patients were transfused with an average of 4.6 units of blood per patient in 2011.

“We found that, in that particular population, many of whom are transfused for acute blood loss, we still saw a significant decrease in the number of units transfused into the patient,” Martin said.

In addition to addressing blood utilization, the investigators developed guidelines to reduce waste. These guidelines state that, when more than 1 unit of blood is ordered, it must be sent in a cooler rather than the pneumatic tube. Coolers were reconfigured to optimize temperature management.

Furthermore, a specific member of the staff is tasked with “ownership” of the blood products, including returning unused product to the blood bank. Finally, individual unit wastage is reported to clinical leaders for review, and aggregate data are reported monthly.

The use of these guidelines resulted in fewer than 80 units of blood being wasted in 2015, down from 300 units in 2011.

Martin said the guidelines she and her colleagues developed could easily be implemented at other medical centers.

“Blood is a limited resource,” she noted, “and we have a responsibility as a healthcare provider to optimize the use of a resource that is difficult to get and only available through altruistic donations.”

Donated blood

Photo courtesy of UAB Hospital

SAN DIEGO—Blood management guidelines can save millions of dollars and drastically reduce the waste of donated blood, according to a group of investigators.

A team at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee, developed blood utilization practice guidelines that resulted in $2 million in savings and a 30% reduction in blood use from 2011 to 2015.

The investigators presented these results in a poster at the 2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP®) Conference.

“The transfusion committee at Vanderbilt was interested in evaluating how we could implement evidence-based guidelines around restrictive transfusion,” said investigator Barbara J. Martin, RN.

To that end, the team first decided to change the standard practice of ordering 2 units of blood per patient. The investigators modified the medical center’s computerized provider order entry system to allow for blood ordering to be based on a specific assessment of each case, rather than a standard order of 2 units.

This change reduced red blood cell transfusions by more than 30%—from 675 units per 1000 discharges in 2011 to 432 units per 1000 discharges in 2015.

The investigators also noted that, for general and vascular surgery patients who underwent NSQIP- targeted procedures—including colectomy, proctectomy, ventral hernia, and appendectomy—between 5% and 6% were transfused with an average of 2.4 units of blood per patient in 2015.

In comparison, 11% of such patients were transfused with an average of 4.6 units of blood per patient in 2011.

“We found that, in that particular population, many of whom are transfused for acute blood loss, we still saw a significant decrease in the number of units transfused into the patient,” Martin said.

In addition to addressing blood utilization, the investigators developed guidelines to reduce waste. These guidelines state that, when more than 1 unit of blood is ordered, it must be sent in a cooler rather than the pneumatic tube. Coolers were reconfigured to optimize temperature management.

Furthermore, a specific member of the staff is tasked with “ownership” of the blood products, including returning unused product to the blood bank. Finally, individual unit wastage is reported to clinical leaders for review, and aggregate data are reported monthly.

The use of these guidelines resulted in fewer than 80 units of blood being wasted in 2015, down from 300 units in 2011.

Martin said the guidelines she and her colleagues developed could easily be implemented at other medical centers.

“Blood is a limited resource,” she noted, “and we have a responsibility as a healthcare provider to optimize the use of a resource that is difficult to get and only available through altruistic donations.”

First impressions of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ proposed updated to the physician fee schedule for 2017 are positive, according to the American College of Physicians.

“We think it’s a great foundation,” Robert B. Doherty, ACP senior vice president of government affairs and public policy, said in an interview.

©TheaDesign/Thinkstock

The proposed update, published July 15 in the Federal Register, brings in a number of new policies aimed at improving physician payment for caring for patients with multiple chronic conditions; mental and behavioral health issues; and cognitive impairment or mobility-related issues.

Among the provisions in the 800+-page proposal, are revised billing codes that would more accurately recognize the work of primary care and other cognitive specialties. The changes, according to CMS, will help “better identify and value primary care, care management, and cognitive services.” Comments on the proposed rule are due Sept. 6, 2016.

The agency is proposing a number of coding changes that “could improve health care delivery for all types of services holding the most promise for healthier people and smarter spending, and advance our health equity goals,” according to a CMS fact sheet.

The proposed fee schedule also would update how quality is measured and reported by accountable care organizations in the Medicare Shared Savings Program; align Accountable Care Organization reporting with the Physician Quality Reporting System; and change how beneficiaries are assigned to an ACO. Potentially misvalued services also would continue to be reviewed under the proposal.

“We think this is a big step forward,” Mr. Doherty said. “There is a lot in this proposed rule to strengthen primary care and particularly to reduce barriers to the ability of primary care physicians to take care of patients with chronic illnesses and patients who have mental or behavioral health conditions.”

“There are a number of specific provisions we are very happy to see in the proposed rule, including improvements in the existing codes for chronic care management, creating new codes for more complex chronic care management, simplifying the billing for those codes, creating reimbursement for a team-based primary and behavioral health care services, expansion of a program to help prevent diabetes and patients who are at high risk of developing diabetes and a whole host of other things,” he continued, adding that upon first inspection, there was nothing that stood out as being a proposal that they were not happy with, though he expects when ACP staff drills deeper into the details, the organization will make recommendations to better strengthen the overall proposal.

The agency is also proposing a code to allow for the payment of advanced care planning services furnished via telehealth.

[email protected]

First impressions of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ proposed updated to the physician fee schedule for 2017 are positive, according to the American College of Physicians.

“We think it’s a great foundation,” Robert B. Doherty, ACP senior vice president of government affairs and public policy, said in an interview.

©TheaDesign/Thinkstock

The proposed update, published July 15 in the Federal Register, brings in a number of new policies aimed at improving physician payment for caring for patients with multiple chronic conditions; mental and behavioral health issues; and cognitive impairment or mobility-related issues.

Among the provisions in the 800+-page proposal, are revised billing codes that would more accurately recognize the work of primary care and other cognitive specialties. The changes, according to CMS, will help “better identify and value primary care, care management, and cognitive services.” Comments on the proposed rule are due Sept. 6, 2016.

The agency is proposing a number of coding changes that “could improve health care delivery for all types of services holding the most promise for healthier people and smarter spending, and advance our health equity goals,” according to a CMS fact sheet.

The proposed fee schedule also would update how quality is measured and reported by accountable care organizations in the Medicare Shared Savings Program; align Accountable Care Organization reporting with the Physician Quality Reporting System; and change how beneficiaries are assigned to an ACO. Potentially misvalued services also would continue to be reviewed under the proposal.

“We think this is a big step forward,” Mr. Doherty said. “There is a lot in this proposed rule to strengthen primary care and particularly to reduce barriers to the ability of primary care physicians to take care of patients with chronic illnesses and patients who have mental or behavioral health conditions.”

“There are a number of specific provisions we are very happy to see in the proposed rule, including improvements in the existing codes for chronic care management, creating new codes for more complex chronic care management, simplifying the billing for those codes, creating reimbursement for a team-based primary and behavioral health care services, expansion of a program to help prevent diabetes and patients who are at high risk of developing diabetes and a whole host of other things,” he continued, adding that upon first inspection, there was nothing that stood out as being a proposal that they were not happy with, though he expects when ACP staff drills deeper into the details, the organization will make recommendations to better strengthen the overall proposal.

The agency is also proposing a code to allow for the payment of advanced care planning services furnished via telehealth.

[email protected]

First impressions of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ proposed updated to the physician fee schedule for 2017 are positive, according to the American College of Physicians.

“We think it’s a great foundation,” Robert B. Doherty, ACP senior vice president of government affairs and public policy, said in an interview.

©TheaDesign/Thinkstock

The proposed update, published July 15 in the Federal Register, brings in a number of new policies aimed at improving physician payment for caring for patients with multiple chronic conditions; mental and behavioral health issues; and cognitive impairment or mobility-related issues.

Among the provisions in the 800+-page proposal, are revised billing codes that would more accurately recognize the work of primary care and other cognitive specialties. The changes, according to CMS, will help “better identify and value primary care, care management, and cognitive services.” Comments on the proposed rule are due Sept. 6, 2016.

The agency is proposing a number of coding changes that “could improve health care delivery for all types of services holding the most promise for healthier people and smarter spending, and advance our health equity goals,” according to a CMS fact sheet.

The proposed fee schedule also would update how quality is measured and reported by accountable care organizations in the Medicare Shared Savings Program; align Accountable Care Organization reporting with the Physician Quality Reporting System; and change how beneficiaries are assigned to an ACO. Potentially misvalued services also would continue to be reviewed under the proposal.

“We think this is a big step forward,” Mr. Doherty said. “There is a lot in this proposed rule to strengthen primary care and particularly to reduce barriers to the ability of primary care physicians to take care of patients with chronic illnesses and patients who have mental or behavioral health conditions.”

“There are a number of specific provisions we are very happy to see in the proposed rule, including improvements in the existing codes for chronic care management, creating new codes for more complex chronic care management, simplifying the billing for those codes, creating reimbursement for a team-based primary and behavioral health care services, expansion of a program to help prevent diabetes and patients who are at high risk of developing diabetes and a whole host of other things,” he continued, adding that upon first inspection, there was nothing that stood out as being a proposal that they were not happy with, though he expects when ACP staff drills deeper into the details, the organization will make recommendations to better strengthen the overall proposal.

The agency is also proposing a code to allow for the payment of advanced care planning services furnished via telehealth.

[email protected]

Ceritinib produced clinically meaningful, durable responses in patients who had advanced non–small-cell lung cancer and a history of multiple treatments with chemotherapies and crizotinib, according to investigators.

Ceritinib was effective even in patients with brain metastases, and it both reduced a high tumor burden and improved lung symptoms, said Lucio Crino, MD, of the University Medical School of Perugia (Italy) and his associates.

©Sebastian Kaulitzki/Thinkstock

They assessed ceritinib in a single-arm, open-label, phase II trial involving 140 adults with advanced ALK-rearranged non–small-cell lung cancer at 51 sites worldwide who had received at least two lines of antineoplastic chemotherapy and had progressed while taking crizotinib. A total of 100 patients (72%) had brain metastases.

After a median follow-up of 11 months (range, 0-19 months), the overall response rate was 38.6% and the disease control rate was 77.1%. Tumor burden was significantly reduced in 75.2% of patients. Treatment response was rapid, occurring at a median of 1.8 months, and durable, lasting for a median of 9.7 months. Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months, median overall survival was 14.9 months, and the 1-year overall survival rate was 63.8%.

Treatment response was similar in the subgroup of patients who had brain metastases at baseline: Their overall response rate was 33.0%, the disease control rate was 74.0%, the median duration of response was 9.2 months, and median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (J Clin Oncol. 2016 July 17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.5936).

No new or unexpected adverse events occurred. All patients reported at least one adverse event, most commonly nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting. Most adverse events were managed without dose interruption or reduction. There was a trend toward improvement in lung symptoms such as cough, pain, and dyspnea, and both health-related quality of life and functional capacity were generally maintained throughout ceritinib treatment, Dr. Crino and his associates said.

Ceritinib produced clinically meaningful, durable responses in patients who had advanced non–small-cell lung cancer and a history of multiple treatments with chemotherapies and crizotinib, according to investigators.

Ceritinib was effective even in patients with brain metastases, and it both reduced a high tumor burden and improved lung symptoms, said Lucio Crino, MD, of the University Medical School of Perugia (Italy) and his associates.

©Sebastian Kaulitzki/Thinkstock

They assessed ceritinib in a single-arm, open-label, phase II trial involving 140 adults with advanced ALK-rearranged non–small-cell lung cancer at 51 sites worldwide who had received at least two lines of antineoplastic chemotherapy and had progressed while taking crizotinib. A total of 100 patients (72%) had brain metastases.

After a median follow-up of 11 months (range, 0-19 months), the overall response rate was 38.6% and the disease control rate was 77.1%. Tumor burden was significantly reduced in 75.2% of patients. Treatment response was rapid, occurring at a median of 1.8 months, and durable, lasting for a median of 9.7 months. Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months, median overall survival was 14.9 months, and the 1-year overall survival rate was 63.8%.

Treatment response was similar in the subgroup of patients who had brain metastases at baseline: Their overall response rate was 33.0%, the disease control rate was 74.0%, the median duration of response was 9.2 months, and median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (J Clin Oncol. 2016 July 17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.5936).

No new or unexpected adverse events occurred. All patients reported at least one adverse event, most commonly nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting. Most adverse events were managed without dose interruption or reduction. There was a trend toward improvement in lung symptoms such as cough, pain, and dyspnea, and both health-related quality of life and functional capacity were generally maintained throughout ceritinib treatment, Dr. Crino and his associates said.

Ceritinib produced clinically meaningful, durable responses in patients who had advanced non–small-cell lung cancer and a history of multiple treatments with chemotherapies and crizotinib, according to investigators.

Ceritinib was effective even in patients with brain metastases, and it both reduced a high tumor burden and improved lung symptoms, said Lucio Crino, MD, of the University Medical School of Perugia (Italy) and his associates.

©Sebastian Kaulitzki/Thinkstock

They assessed ceritinib in a single-arm, open-label, phase II trial involving 140 adults with advanced ALK-rearranged non–small-cell lung cancer at 51 sites worldwide who had received at least two lines of antineoplastic chemotherapy and had progressed while taking crizotinib. A total of 100 patients (72%) had brain metastases.

After a median follow-up of 11 months (range, 0-19 months), the overall response rate was 38.6% and the disease control rate was 77.1%. Tumor burden was significantly reduced in 75.2% of patients. Treatment response was rapid, occurring at a median of 1.8 months, and durable, lasting for a median of 9.7 months. Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months, median overall survival was 14.9 months, and the 1-year overall survival rate was 63.8%.

Treatment response was similar in the subgroup of patients who had brain metastases at baseline: Their overall response rate was 33.0%, the disease control rate was 74.0%, the median duration of response was 9.2 months, and median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (J Clin Oncol. 2016 July 17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.5936).

No new or unexpected adverse events occurred. All patients reported at least one adverse event, most commonly nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting. Most adverse events were managed without dose interruption or reduction. There was a trend toward improvement in lung symptoms such as cough, pain, and dyspnea, and both health-related quality of life and functional capacity were generally maintained throughout ceritinib treatment, Dr. Crino and his associates said.

Among patients with rectal cancer, delaying surgery for 11 weeks after the end of radiochemotherapy does not improve pathologic complete response rates, investigators reported.

Previously, the Lyon trial, the only randomized controlled study to investigate the effects of delaying surgery following the end of radiochemotherapy (RCT), found that compared with a 2-week delay, a 6-week delay significantly increased the number of patients who experienced complete response (53.1% vs. 71.7%, P = .007). The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effect of a longer interval between RCT and surgery on pathologic complete response (pCR) rates.

For the phase III, multicenter, randomized trial, 265 patients with mid or lower rectal cancer were randomized to receive surgery at 7 weeks (n = 133) or 11 weeks (n = 132) following the end of RCT.

Baseline tumor characteristics and patient demographics were similar between the two study arms; the majority of patients had stage cT3 rectal cancer (82%).

There was no significant difference in pathologic complete response rate between the study arms (15% for 7-week group vs. 17.4% for 11-week group, P = .5983), reported Jeremie Lefevre, MD, of Hopital Saint-Antoine, Paris, and his associates (J Clin Oncol. 2016 July. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.6049).

Overall morbidity was significantly increased in the 11-week group (44.5% v 32%; P = .04), primarily explained by an increase in medical complications (32.8% vs. 19.2%; P = .01), the investigators wrote.

The French Ministry of Health funded the study. Dr. Lefevre and seven of his associates reported serving in advisory roles, receiving financial compensation, or participating in the speakers bureau for multiple companies.

[email protected]

On Twitter @jessnicolecraig

Among patients with rectal cancer, delaying surgery for 11 weeks after the end of radiochemotherapy does not improve pathologic complete response rates, investigators reported.

Previously, the Lyon trial, the only randomized controlled study to investigate the effects of delaying surgery following the end of radiochemotherapy (RCT), found that compared with a 2-week delay, a 6-week delay significantly increased the number of patients who experienced complete response (53.1% vs. 71.7%, P = .007). The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effect of a longer interval between RCT and surgery on pathologic complete response (pCR) rates.

For the phase III, multicenter, randomized trial, 265 patients with mid or lower rectal cancer were randomized to receive surgery at 7 weeks (n = 133) or 11 weeks (n = 132) following the end of RCT.

Baseline tumor characteristics and patient demographics were similar between the two study arms; the majority of patients had stage cT3 rectal cancer (82%).

There was no significant difference in pathologic complete response rate between the study arms (15% for 7-week group vs. 17.4% for 11-week group, P = .5983), reported Jeremie Lefevre, MD, of Hopital Saint-Antoine, Paris, and his associates (J Clin Oncol. 2016 July. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.6049).

Overall morbidity was significantly increased in the 11-week group (44.5% v 32%; P = .04), primarily explained by an increase in medical complications (32.8% vs. 19.2%; P = .01), the investigators wrote.

The French Ministry of Health funded the study. Dr. Lefevre and seven of his associates reported serving in advisory roles, receiving financial compensation, or participating in the speakers bureau for multiple companies.

[email protected]

On Twitter @jessnicolecraig

Among patients with rectal cancer, delaying surgery for 11 weeks after the end of radiochemotherapy does not improve pathologic complete response rates, investigators reported.

Previously, the Lyon trial, the only randomized controlled study to investigate the effects of delaying surgery following the end of radiochemotherapy (RCT), found that compared with a 2-week delay, a 6-week delay significantly increased the number of patients who experienced complete response (53.1% vs. 71.7%, P = .007). The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effect of a longer interval between RCT and surgery on pathologic complete response (pCR) rates.

For the phase III, multicenter, randomized trial, 265 patients with mid or lower rectal cancer were randomized to receive surgery at 7 weeks (n = 133) or 11 weeks (n = 132) following the end of RCT.

Baseline tumor characteristics and patient demographics were similar between the two study arms; the majority of patients had stage cT3 rectal cancer (82%).

There was no significant difference in pathologic complete response rate between the study arms (15% for 7-week group vs. 17.4% for 11-week group, P = .5983), reported Jeremie Lefevre, MD, of Hopital Saint-Antoine, Paris, and his associates (J Clin Oncol. 2016 July. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.6049).

Overall morbidity was significantly increased in the 11-week group (44.5% v 32%; P = .04), primarily explained by an increase in medical complications (32.8% vs. 19.2%; P = .01), the investigators wrote.

The French Ministry of Health funded the study. Dr. Lefevre and seven of his associates reported serving in advisory roles, receiving financial compensation, or participating in the speakers bureau for multiple companies.

[email protected]

On Twitter @jessnicolecraig

To determine if genetic variation influences the susceptibility to traumatic brain injury and the subsequent posttraumatic seizures, Anne Ritter and her associates from the University of Pittsburgh analyzed the relationship between posttraumatic seizures and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Thirty two SNPs were evaluated within SLC1A1 and SLC1A6, which are protein coding genes for glutamate transporters. (Glutamate transporters control glutamate levels and excitatory neurotransmission and have been associated with traumatic brain injury.) The analysis found that among 253 individuals, 49 had experienced posttraumatic seizures. Within this smaller group, they found genotypes at SNP rs10974620 (SLC1A1) linked to the time to the first seizure during a three year follow-up. And after factoring in several confounding variables, rs10974620 remained statistically significant (P = .017).

Rittner AC, Kammerer CM, Brooks MM, Conley YP, Wagner AM. Genetic variation in neuronal glutamate transport genes and associations with posttraumatic seizure. Epilepsia. 2016;57(6):984-993. 

To determine if genetic variation influences the susceptibility to traumatic brain injury and the subsequent posttraumatic seizures, Anne Ritter and her associates from the University of Pittsburgh analyzed the relationship between posttraumatic seizures and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Thirty two SNPs were evaluated within SLC1A1 and SLC1A6, which are protein coding genes for glutamate transporters. (Glutamate transporters control glutamate levels and excitatory neurotransmission and have been associated with traumatic brain injury.) The analysis found that among 253 individuals, 49 had experienced posttraumatic seizures. Within this smaller group, they found genotypes at SNP rs10974620 (SLC1A1) linked to the time to the first seizure during a three year follow-up. And after factoring in several confounding variables, rs10974620 remained statistically significant (P = .017).

Rittner AC, Kammerer CM, Brooks MM, Conley YP, Wagner AM. Genetic variation in neuronal glutamate transport genes and associations with posttraumatic seizure. Epilepsia. 2016;57(6):984-993. 

To determine if genetic variation influences the susceptibility to traumatic brain injury and the subsequent posttraumatic seizures, Anne Ritter and her associates from the University of Pittsburgh analyzed the relationship between posttraumatic seizures and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Thirty two SNPs were evaluated within SLC1A1 and SLC1A6, which are protein coding genes for glutamate transporters. (Glutamate transporters control glutamate levels and excitatory neurotransmission and have been associated with traumatic brain injury.) The analysis found that among 253 individuals, 49 had experienced posttraumatic seizures. Within this smaller group, they found genotypes at SNP rs10974620 (SLC1A1) linked to the time to the first seizure during a three year follow-up. And after factoring in several confounding variables, rs10974620 remained statistically significant (P = .017).

Rittner AC, Kammerer CM, Brooks MM, Conley YP, Wagner AM. Genetic variation in neuronal glutamate transport genes and associations with posttraumatic seizure. Epilepsia. 2016;57(6):984-993. 

To determine the unique characteristics of cluster seizures, investigators looked at 92 subjects, 83% of whom had at least one seizure cluster. They found that seizures occurring within a cluster were significantly shorter than the last seizure that occurred in the cluster. They also discovered that the terminal seizure in a cluster is similar to duration in isolated seizures that are not part of a cluster. Finally, the researchers found that cluster seizures are more likely to occur in the frontal and temporal lobes.

Ferastraoaru V, Schulze-Bonhage A, Lipton RB, Dumpelmann M, Legatt AD, Hunt SR. Termination of seizure clusters is related to duration of focal seizures. Epilepsia. 2016;57(6):889-895.

To determine the unique characteristics of cluster seizures, investigators looked at 92 subjects, 83% of whom had at least one seizure cluster. They found that seizures occurring within a cluster were significantly shorter than the last seizure that occurred in the cluster. They also discovered that the terminal seizure in a cluster is similar to duration in isolated seizures that are not part of a cluster. Finally, the researchers found that cluster seizures are more likely to occur in the frontal and temporal lobes.

Ferastraoaru V, Schulze-Bonhage A, Lipton RB, Dumpelmann M, Legatt AD, Hunt SR. Termination of seizure clusters is related to duration of focal seizures. Epilepsia. 2016;57(6):889-895.

To determine the unique characteristics of cluster seizures, investigators looked at 92 subjects, 83% of whom had at least one seizure cluster. They found that seizures occurring within a cluster were significantly shorter than the last seizure that occurred in the cluster. They also discovered that the terminal seizure in a cluster is similar to duration in isolated seizures that are not part of a cluster. Finally, the researchers found that cluster seizures are more likely to occur in the frontal and temporal lobes.

Ferastraoaru V, Schulze-Bonhage A, Lipton RB, Dumpelmann M, Legatt AD, Hunt SR. Termination of seizure clusters is related to duration of focal seizures. Epilepsia. 2016;57(6):889-895.

Health officials are looking into a case of Zika virus infection in Utah, where a person was infected after caring for an elderly family member with the virus.

In the new case, the person had not recently traveled to an area with Zika and had not had sex with anyone with Zika infection or who had traveled to an area with Zika. Also, there is no current evidence that the Aedes mosquitoes, known to spread Zika virus, have been active in Utah.

©Devonyu/Thinkstock

The elderly Utah man who was first infected with Zika died in late June of unknown causes. He had traveled to an area with Zika, and laboratory tests revealed that he had virus levels more than 100,000 times higher than seen in other samples of infected people, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The Utah Department of Health and the CDC are investigating the possible cause of infection.

“We are trying to determine if the contact between the very sick elderly patient and the person played a role in how the person got sick,” Satish Pillai, PhD, deputy incident manager with CDC’s Zika response, said during a news conference. “We don’t have all of the answers right now, but we will continue to share the information as it comes available.”

CDC currently is not altering its instructions on the use of personal protective equipment.

“I think what this highlights is the fact that when you have an infection like Zika virus ... wherein a good percentage of patients don’t actually have symptoms, it means that it’s as important as ever to stick with good adherence to standard precautions,” Dr. Pillai said. “Just like we assume anybody might carry hepatitis or HIV, we don’t wait for a positive diagnosis in order to prevent blood or body fluid exposure. The same thing is true with Zika virus, and I think this is a great example of why we should never take chances, but always adhere to careful standards of touching.”

“The new case in Utah is a surprise, showing that we still have more to learn about Zika,” Erin Staples, MD, PhD, CDC medical epidemiologist on the ground in Utah, said in a statement. “Fortunately, the patient recovered quickly, and from what we have seen with more than 1,300 travel-associated cases of Zika in the continental United States and Hawaii, nonsexual spread from one person to another does not appear to be common.”

Health officials are looking into a case of Zika virus infection in Utah, where a person was infected after caring for an elderly family member with the virus.

In the new case, the person had not recently traveled to an area with Zika and had not had sex with anyone with Zika infection or who had traveled to an area with Zika. Also, there is no current evidence that the Aedes mosquitoes, known to spread Zika virus, have been active in Utah.

©Devonyu/Thinkstock

The elderly Utah man who was first infected with Zika died in late June of unknown causes. He had traveled to an area with Zika, and laboratory tests revealed that he had virus levels more than 100,000 times higher than seen in other samples of infected people, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The Utah Department of Health and the CDC are investigating the possible cause of infection.

“We are trying to determine if the contact between the very sick elderly patient and the person played a role in how the person got sick,” Satish Pillai, PhD, deputy incident manager with CDC’s Zika response, said during a news conference. “We don’t have all of the answers right now, but we will continue to share the information as it comes available.”

CDC currently is not altering its instructions on the use of personal protective equipment.

“I think what this highlights is the fact that when you have an infection like Zika virus ... wherein a good percentage of patients don’t actually have symptoms, it means that it’s as important as ever to stick with good adherence to standard precautions,” Dr. Pillai said. “Just like we assume anybody might carry hepatitis or HIV, we don’t wait for a positive diagnosis in order to prevent blood or body fluid exposure. The same thing is true with Zika virus, and I think this is a great example of why we should never take chances, but always adhere to careful standards of touching.”

“The new case in Utah is a surprise, showing that we still have more to learn about Zika,” Erin Staples, MD, PhD, CDC medical epidemiologist on the ground in Utah, said in a statement. “Fortunately, the patient recovered quickly, and from what we have seen with more than 1,300 travel-associated cases of Zika in the continental United States and Hawaii, nonsexual spread from one person to another does not appear to be common.”

Health officials are looking into a case of Zika virus infection in Utah, where a person was infected after caring for an elderly family member with the virus.

In the new case, the person had not recently traveled to an area with Zika and had not had sex with anyone with Zika infection or who had traveled to an area with Zika. Also, there is no current evidence that the Aedes mosquitoes, known to spread Zika virus, have been active in Utah.

©Devonyu/Thinkstock

The elderly Utah man who was first infected with Zika died in late June of unknown causes. He had traveled to an area with Zika, and laboratory tests revealed that he had virus levels more than 100,000 times higher than seen in other samples of infected people, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The Utah Department of Health and the CDC are investigating the possible cause of infection.

“We are trying to determine if the contact between the very sick elderly patient and the person played a role in how the person got sick,” Satish Pillai, PhD, deputy incident manager with CDC’s Zika response, said during a news conference. “We don’t have all of the answers right now, but we will continue to share the information as it comes available.”

CDC currently is not altering its instructions on the use of personal protective equipment.

“I think what this highlights is the fact that when you have an infection like Zika virus ... wherein a good percentage of patients don’t actually have symptoms, it means that it’s as important as ever to stick with good adherence to standard precautions,” Dr. Pillai said. “Just like we assume anybody might carry hepatitis or HIV, we don’t wait for a positive diagnosis in order to prevent blood or body fluid exposure. The same thing is true with Zika virus, and I think this is a great example of why we should never take chances, but always adhere to careful standards of touching.”

“The new case in Utah is a surprise, showing that we still have more to learn about Zika,” Erin Staples, MD, PhD, CDC medical epidemiologist on the ground in Utah, said in a statement. “Fortunately, the patient recovered quickly, and from what we have seen with more than 1,300 travel-associated cases of Zika in the continental United States and Hawaii, nonsexual spread from one person to another does not appear to be common.”

Health officials are looking into a case of Zika virus infection in Utah, where a person was infected after caring for an elderly family member with the virus.

In the new case, the person had not recently traveled to an area with Zika and had not had sex with anyone with Zika infection or who had traveled to an area with Zika. Also, there is no current evidence that the Aedes mosquitoes, known to spread Zika virus, have been active in Utah.

©Devonyu/Thinkstock

The elderly Utah man who was first infected with Zika died in late June of unknown causes. He had traveled to an area with Zika, and laboratory tests revealed that he had virus levels more than 100,000 times higher than seen in other samples of infected people, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The Utah Department of Health and the CDC are investigating the possible cause of infection.

“We are trying to determine if the contact between the very sick elderly patient and the person played a role in how the person got sick,” Satish Pillai, PhD, deputy incident manager with CDC’s Zika response, said during a news conference. “We don’t have all of the answers right now, but we will continue to share the information as it comes available.”

CDC currently is not altering its instructions on the use of personal protective equipment.

“I think what this highlights is the fact that when you have an infection like Zika virus ... wherein a good percentage of patients don’t actually have symptoms, it means that it’s as important as ever to stick with good adherence to standard precautions,” Dr. Pillai said. “Just like we assume anybody might carry hepatitis or HIV, we don’t wait for a positive diagnosis in order to prevent blood or body fluid exposure. The same thing is true with Zika virus, and I think this is a great example of why we should never take chances, but always adhere to careful standards of touching.”

“The new case in Utah is a surprise, showing that we still have more to learn about Zika,” Erin Staples, MD, PhD, CDC medical epidemiologist on the ground in Utah, said in a statement. “Fortunately, the patient recovered quickly, and from what we have seen with more than 1,300 travel-associated cases of Zika in the continental United States and Hawaii, nonsexual spread from one person to another does not appear to be common.”

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryellenny

Health officials are looking into a case of Zika virus infection in Utah, where a person was infected after caring for an elderly family member with the virus.

In the new case, the person had not recently traveled to an area with Zika and had not had sex with anyone with Zika infection or who had traveled to an area with Zika. Also, there is no current evidence that the Aedes mosquitoes, known to spread Zika virus, have been active in Utah.

©Devonyu/Thinkstock

The elderly Utah man who was first infected with Zika died in late June of unknown causes. He had traveled to an area with Zika, and laboratory tests revealed that he had virus levels more than 100,000 times higher than seen in other samples of infected people, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The Utah Department of Health and the CDC are investigating the possible cause of infection.

“We are trying to determine if the contact between the very sick elderly patient and the person played a role in how the person got sick,” Satish Pillai, PhD, deputy incident manager with CDC’s Zika response, said during a news conference. “We don’t have all of the answers right now, but we will continue to share the information as it comes available.”

CDC currently is not altering its instructions on the use of personal protective equipment.

“I think what this highlights is the fact that when you have an infection like Zika virus ... wherein a good percentage of patients don’t actually have symptoms, it means that it’s as important as ever to stick with good adherence to standard precautions,” Dr. Pillai said. “Just like we assume anybody might carry hepatitis or HIV, we don’t wait for a positive diagnosis in order to prevent blood or body fluid exposure. The same thing is true with Zika virus, and I think this is a great example of why we should never take chances, but always adhere to careful standards of touching.”

“The new case in Utah is a surprise, showing that we still have more to learn about Zika,” Erin Staples, MD, PhD, CDC medical epidemiologist on the ground in Utah, said in a statement. “Fortunately, the patient recovered quickly, and from what we have seen with more than 1,300 travel-associated cases of Zika in the continental United States and Hawaii, nonsexual spread from one person to another does not appear to be common.”

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryellenny

Health officials are looking into a case of Zika virus infection in Utah, where a person was infected after caring for an elderly family member with the virus.

In the new case, the person had not recently traveled to an area with Zika and had not had sex with anyone with Zika infection or who had traveled to an area with Zika. Also, there is no current evidence that the Aedes mosquitoes, known to spread Zika virus, have been active in Utah.

©Devonyu/Thinkstock

The elderly Utah man who was first infected with Zika died in late June of unknown causes. He had traveled to an area with Zika, and laboratory tests revealed that he had virus levels more than 100,000 times higher than seen in other samples of infected people, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The Utah Department of Health and the CDC are investigating the possible cause of infection.

“We are trying to determine if the contact between the very sick elderly patient and the person played a role in how the person got sick,” Satish Pillai, PhD, deputy incident manager with CDC’s Zika response, said during a news conference. “We don’t have all of the answers right now, but we will continue to share the information as it comes available.”

CDC currently is not altering its instructions on the use of personal protective equipment.

“I think what this highlights is the fact that when you have an infection like Zika virus ... wherein a good percentage of patients don’t actually have symptoms, it means that it’s as important as ever to stick with good adherence to standard precautions,” Dr. Pillai said. “Just like we assume anybody might carry hepatitis or HIV, we don’t wait for a positive diagnosis in order to prevent blood or body fluid exposure. The same thing is true with Zika virus, and I think this is a great example of why we should never take chances, but always adhere to careful standards of touching.”

“The new case in Utah is a surprise, showing that we still have more to learn about Zika,” Erin Staples, MD, PhD, CDC medical epidemiologist on the ground in Utah, said in a statement. “Fortunately, the patient recovered quickly, and from what we have seen with more than 1,300 travel-associated cases of Zika in the continental United States and Hawaii, nonsexual spread from one person to another does not appear to be common.”

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryellenny