User login
Unintended consequences in the drive to simplify computerized test ordering
“X marks the spot!”
It’s one of the classic pirate tropes, bringing to mind images of Long John Silver, buried treasure, and a secret map with an “X” to show the hidden gold.
Today that “X” (or, in some cases, a check mark or radio button) seems to be indicating where the money is to be lost, rather than found.
Hospital computer systems are increasingly reliant on preprogrammed order lists that you check off rather than the actual test itself. We’ve gone from having to write out the tests we want, to typing them into a box, to checking them off with a mouse.
I’ve seen systems where you’re offered a menu such as:
A. Brain MRI (noncontrast)
B. Brain MRI (w/wo contrast)
C. Head MRA (noncontrast)
D. Head MRA (with contrast)
E. Neck MRA (noncontrast)
F. Neck MRA (with contrast)
G. Brain MRI and head/neck MRA (noncontrast)
H. Brain MRI and head/neck MRA (w/wo contrast)
And that’s just for the brain and its vascular supply. Expand that to the rest of the nervous system, then to the whole body, then to other tests (labs) ... and you get the idea.
I suppose the driving force here is to make the system easier to use. Doctors are busy. It saves time just have to check a box if you want three tests, rather than note all of them individually.
But it’s really not that hard to check off three. Probably less than 5 seconds (as of my last time on call). And this is where, to me, X marks the spot where the money isn’t.
Humans, like most animals, are pretty good at defaulting to a low-energy setting. So if you only have to check off one box instead of three, or five, or whatever, why bother?
If the patient is being admitted for a stroke/TIA, then it makes sense to do the brain MRI and head/neck MRA. But what if it’s just headaches, or a new seizure, or a concussion? I see plenty of times when more tests are done than necessary, simply because the ordering physician either didn’t know what was really needed or because it was easier to just check the box.
This is not, in my experience, rare. I’d say anywhere from one-third to half of patients I’ve consulted on had an overkill neurological work-up, in which tests with no medical indications had been ordered. They’ve generally already been put in the system, or even done, before I get to the bedside.
I suppose one could say they should wait for the specialist to get there before any of the costly tests are ordered, but that opens up another can of worms. What if a critical finding that needed to be acted upon isn’t found in time because of such a rule? Not only that, but waiting for me to show up and order tests means it will take longer to get them done, adding onto the hospital stay, and (again) running up costs.
So that’s not an answer, either. There really isn’t one, unfortunately.
But, in our haste to make things easier, or faster, or even just flashier, the trend seems to be at the cost of doing things reasonably. At the same time that we’re trying to save money, the single “X” may be marking the spot where we’re actually throwing it away.
Dr. Block has a solo neurology practice in Scottsdale, Ariz.
“X marks the spot!”
It’s one of the classic pirate tropes, bringing to mind images of Long John Silver, buried treasure, and a secret map with an “X” to show the hidden gold.
Today that “X” (or, in some cases, a check mark or radio button) seems to be indicating where the money is to be lost, rather than found.
Hospital computer systems are increasingly reliant on preprogrammed order lists that you check off rather than the actual test itself. We’ve gone from having to write out the tests we want, to typing them into a box, to checking them off with a mouse.
I’ve seen systems where you’re offered a menu such as:
A. Brain MRI (noncontrast)
B. Brain MRI (w/wo contrast)
C. Head MRA (noncontrast)
D. Head MRA (with contrast)
E. Neck MRA (noncontrast)
F. Neck MRA (with contrast)
G. Brain MRI and head/neck MRA (noncontrast)
H. Brain MRI and head/neck MRA (w/wo contrast)
And that’s just for the brain and its vascular supply. Expand that to the rest of the nervous system, then to the whole body, then to other tests (labs) ... and you get the idea.
I suppose the driving force here is to make the system easier to use. Doctors are busy. It saves time just have to check a box if you want three tests, rather than note all of them individually.
But it’s really not that hard to check off three. Probably less than 5 seconds (as of my last time on call). And this is where, to me, X marks the spot where the money isn’t.
Humans, like most animals, are pretty good at defaulting to a low-energy setting. So if you only have to check off one box instead of three, or five, or whatever, why bother?
If the patient is being admitted for a stroke/TIA, then it makes sense to do the brain MRI and head/neck MRA. But what if it’s just headaches, or a new seizure, or a concussion? I see plenty of times when more tests are done than necessary, simply because the ordering physician either didn’t know what was really needed or because it was easier to just check the box.
This is not, in my experience, rare. I’d say anywhere from one-third to half of patients I’ve consulted on had an overkill neurological work-up, in which tests with no medical indications had been ordered. They’ve generally already been put in the system, or even done, before I get to the bedside.
I suppose one could say they should wait for the specialist to get there before any of the costly tests are ordered, but that opens up another can of worms. What if a critical finding that needed to be acted upon isn’t found in time because of such a rule? Not only that, but waiting for me to show up and order tests means it will take longer to get them done, adding onto the hospital stay, and (again) running up costs.
So that’s not an answer, either. There really isn’t one, unfortunately.
But, in our haste to make things easier, or faster, or even just flashier, the trend seems to be at the cost of doing things reasonably. At the same time that we’re trying to save money, the single “X” may be marking the spot where we’re actually throwing it away.
Dr. Block has a solo neurology practice in Scottsdale, Ariz.
“X marks the spot!”
It’s one of the classic pirate tropes, bringing to mind images of Long John Silver, buried treasure, and a secret map with an “X” to show the hidden gold.
Today that “X” (or, in some cases, a check mark or radio button) seems to be indicating where the money is to be lost, rather than found.
Hospital computer systems are increasingly reliant on preprogrammed order lists that you check off rather than the actual test itself. We’ve gone from having to write out the tests we want, to typing them into a box, to checking them off with a mouse.
I’ve seen systems where you’re offered a menu such as:
A. Brain MRI (noncontrast)
B. Brain MRI (w/wo contrast)
C. Head MRA (noncontrast)
D. Head MRA (with contrast)
E. Neck MRA (noncontrast)
F. Neck MRA (with contrast)
G. Brain MRI and head/neck MRA (noncontrast)
H. Brain MRI and head/neck MRA (w/wo contrast)
And that’s just for the brain and its vascular supply. Expand that to the rest of the nervous system, then to the whole body, then to other tests (labs) ... and you get the idea.
I suppose the driving force here is to make the system easier to use. Doctors are busy. It saves time just have to check a box if you want three tests, rather than note all of them individually.
But it’s really not that hard to check off three. Probably less than 5 seconds (as of my last time on call). And this is where, to me, X marks the spot where the money isn’t.
Humans, like most animals, are pretty good at defaulting to a low-energy setting. So if you only have to check off one box instead of three, or five, or whatever, why bother?
If the patient is being admitted for a stroke/TIA, then it makes sense to do the brain MRI and head/neck MRA. But what if it’s just headaches, or a new seizure, or a concussion? I see plenty of times when more tests are done than necessary, simply because the ordering physician either didn’t know what was really needed or because it was easier to just check the box.
This is not, in my experience, rare. I’d say anywhere from one-third to half of patients I’ve consulted on had an overkill neurological work-up, in which tests with no medical indications had been ordered. They’ve generally already been put in the system, or even done, before I get to the bedside.
I suppose one could say they should wait for the specialist to get there before any of the costly tests are ordered, but that opens up another can of worms. What if a critical finding that needed to be acted upon isn’t found in time because of such a rule? Not only that, but waiting for me to show up and order tests means it will take longer to get them done, adding onto the hospital stay, and (again) running up costs.
So that’s not an answer, either. There really isn’t one, unfortunately.
But, in our haste to make things easier, or faster, or even just flashier, the trend seems to be at the cost of doing things reasonably. At the same time that we’re trying to save money, the single “X” may be marking the spot where we’re actually throwing it away.
Dr. Block has a solo neurology practice in Scottsdale, Ariz.
A new era of TTP treatment
Earlier this year, the Food and Drug Administration approved Cablivi (caplacizumab-yhdp) (Sanofi Genzyme, Cambridge, Mass.) for the treatment of acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), making it the first medication specifically indicated for the treatment of TTP.
The approval of caplacizumab and the clinical trial results that approval is based on are the most promising developments in the treatment of TTP since the introduction of plasma exchange (PE) therapy. However, many questions remain about how to best administer caplacizumab, specifically, which patients should receive it? Should all TTP patients start on caplacizumab therapy or should it be limited to patients with histories of TTP or those slow to respond to standard therapy with PE and immunosuppression?
TTP is a rare thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia caused by the inhibition of ADAMTS13, a metalloproteinase, which cleaves large-molecular-weight von Willebrand factor (vWF) multimers. Caplacizumab is a humanized bivalent, variable domain-only immunoglobulin fragment. The drug targets the A1 domain of vWF and inhibits the binding between vWF and the platelet glycoprotein Ib-IX-V receptor, preventing the formation of the microvascular thrombi and platelet loss associated with TTP.
FDA approval of caplacizumab came shortly after the publication of the results of the HERCULES trial in the New England Journal of Medicine by Marie Scully, MD, and her colleagues (N Engl J Med. 2019; 380[4]: 335-46).
HERCULES was an international phase 3, double blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of caplacizumab. In total, 145 patients participated in the trial. Caplacizumab or placebo were given in addition to standard therapy of plasma exchange (PE) and immunosuppression. Caplacizumab or placebo were administered as an intravenous loading dose prior to the first PE after randomization and subcutaneously once daily until 30 days after the last PE. All patients received daily PE until 2 days after platelet count normalization.
The primary measure of the study was the time to platelet count response of greater than 150 x 109/L following the cessation of daily PE. Secondary measures included TTP-related death; TTP relapse; major thromboembolic events; proportion of subjects with refractory TTP; normalization of organ damage markers including lactate dehydrogenase, cardiac troponin I, and serum creatinine; and other adverse events.
The authors found that the median time of normalization of the platelet count was shorter in the caplacizumab group, compared with placebo, with the caplacizumab group being 1.55 times more likely to have a normalized platelet count at any given time point in the study. While statistically significant differences were identified in the rate of platelet normalization, the median number of days of PE until normalization was only 2 days less in the caplacizumab group (five treatments) than in the placebo group (seven treatments), which may not be clinically significant for the treating physician.
In fact, the secondary endpoints of the study seem much more clinically promising in the treatment of TTP. The composite rate of TTP-related death, TTP recurrence, or major thromboembolic events during the treatment period was significantly lower in the caplacizumab group (12%) versus placebo (49%). No TTP-related deaths occurred in the caplacizumab group. The caplacizumab group was also statistically less likely to have a TTP exacerbation, defined as disease recurrence within 30 days from the last PE, than the placebo group.
End organ damage serum markers also improved faster in the caplacizumab group, although there was no significant difference between groups. Overall hospitalization (median of 9 vs. 12 days) and ICU stays (median of 3 vs. 5 days) were shorter in the caplacizumab group, compared with the placebo group.
While several relapses, defined as disease recurrence after 30 days from the last PE, occurred in the caplacizumab group, the relapses were only found in patients with ADAMTS13 activity of less than 10% at the end of the treatment period. Mild side effects, such as mucocutaneous bleeding were more frequent in the caplacizumab group. No major bleeding complications were observed.
The HERCULES trial generates more questions about the role of ADAMTS13 activity testing to monitor treatment response and to make therapy decisions. Extremely low ADAMTS13 activity levels at the cessation of therapy may be a sign of treatment inadequacy and may warrant closer follow-up of at-risk patients on caplacizumab.
Sanofi Genzyme estimates that the U.S. list price will be approximately $270,000 for a standard treatment course, according to a news release from the company. Whether payers will add it to formularies remains uncertain, but the high drug cost may be countered by potential savings in the reduction of hospital and ICU days with caplacizumab therapy. Sanofi Genzyme will also have a patient support program for eligible patients.
Caplacizumab has been approved in Europe since August 2018, but is not readily available in the United States. Given the dearth of clinical experience with the drug outside of the TITAN and HERCULES trials, strong recommendations for when and how to initiate therapy remain elusive.
As caplacizumab is further introduced into clinical practice, more studies are needed to identify which patient groups will benefit most from therapy. The current data for caplacizumab shows that it will be used as an adjunct to standard PE therapy, rather than as a replacement. How the drug is used in combination with current TTP treatments – such as corticosteroids, rituximab, bortezomib, vincristine, N-acetylcysteine, and splenectomy – should be evaluated to identify which treatment combinations not only improve platelet counts, but also reduce mortality and morbidity while remaining cost effective.
Dr. Ricci is a staff physician and Apheresis Director at the Taussig Cancer Institute at the Cleveland Clinic. She reported having no conflicts of interest.
Earlier this year, the Food and Drug Administration approved Cablivi (caplacizumab-yhdp) (Sanofi Genzyme, Cambridge, Mass.) for the treatment of acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), making it the first medication specifically indicated for the treatment of TTP.
The approval of caplacizumab and the clinical trial results that approval is based on are the most promising developments in the treatment of TTP since the introduction of plasma exchange (PE) therapy. However, many questions remain about how to best administer caplacizumab, specifically, which patients should receive it? Should all TTP patients start on caplacizumab therapy or should it be limited to patients with histories of TTP or those slow to respond to standard therapy with PE and immunosuppression?
TTP is a rare thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia caused by the inhibition of ADAMTS13, a metalloproteinase, which cleaves large-molecular-weight von Willebrand factor (vWF) multimers. Caplacizumab is a humanized bivalent, variable domain-only immunoglobulin fragment. The drug targets the A1 domain of vWF and inhibits the binding between vWF and the platelet glycoprotein Ib-IX-V receptor, preventing the formation of the microvascular thrombi and platelet loss associated with TTP.
FDA approval of caplacizumab came shortly after the publication of the results of the HERCULES trial in the New England Journal of Medicine by Marie Scully, MD, and her colleagues (N Engl J Med. 2019; 380[4]: 335-46).
HERCULES was an international phase 3, double blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of caplacizumab. In total, 145 patients participated in the trial. Caplacizumab or placebo were given in addition to standard therapy of plasma exchange (PE) and immunosuppression. Caplacizumab or placebo were administered as an intravenous loading dose prior to the first PE after randomization and subcutaneously once daily until 30 days after the last PE. All patients received daily PE until 2 days after platelet count normalization.
The primary measure of the study was the time to platelet count response of greater than 150 x 109/L following the cessation of daily PE. Secondary measures included TTP-related death; TTP relapse; major thromboembolic events; proportion of subjects with refractory TTP; normalization of organ damage markers including lactate dehydrogenase, cardiac troponin I, and serum creatinine; and other adverse events.
The authors found that the median time of normalization of the platelet count was shorter in the caplacizumab group, compared with placebo, with the caplacizumab group being 1.55 times more likely to have a normalized platelet count at any given time point in the study. While statistically significant differences were identified in the rate of platelet normalization, the median number of days of PE until normalization was only 2 days less in the caplacizumab group (five treatments) than in the placebo group (seven treatments), which may not be clinically significant for the treating physician.
In fact, the secondary endpoints of the study seem much more clinically promising in the treatment of TTP. The composite rate of TTP-related death, TTP recurrence, or major thromboembolic events during the treatment period was significantly lower in the caplacizumab group (12%) versus placebo (49%). No TTP-related deaths occurred in the caplacizumab group. The caplacizumab group was also statistically less likely to have a TTP exacerbation, defined as disease recurrence within 30 days from the last PE, than the placebo group.
End organ damage serum markers also improved faster in the caplacizumab group, although there was no significant difference between groups. Overall hospitalization (median of 9 vs. 12 days) and ICU stays (median of 3 vs. 5 days) were shorter in the caplacizumab group, compared with the placebo group.
While several relapses, defined as disease recurrence after 30 days from the last PE, occurred in the caplacizumab group, the relapses were only found in patients with ADAMTS13 activity of less than 10% at the end of the treatment period. Mild side effects, such as mucocutaneous bleeding were more frequent in the caplacizumab group. No major bleeding complications were observed.
The HERCULES trial generates more questions about the role of ADAMTS13 activity testing to monitor treatment response and to make therapy decisions. Extremely low ADAMTS13 activity levels at the cessation of therapy may be a sign of treatment inadequacy and may warrant closer follow-up of at-risk patients on caplacizumab.
Sanofi Genzyme estimates that the U.S. list price will be approximately $270,000 for a standard treatment course, according to a news release from the company. Whether payers will add it to formularies remains uncertain, but the high drug cost may be countered by potential savings in the reduction of hospital and ICU days with caplacizumab therapy. Sanofi Genzyme will also have a patient support program for eligible patients.
Caplacizumab has been approved in Europe since August 2018, but is not readily available in the United States. Given the dearth of clinical experience with the drug outside of the TITAN and HERCULES trials, strong recommendations for when and how to initiate therapy remain elusive.
As caplacizumab is further introduced into clinical practice, more studies are needed to identify which patient groups will benefit most from therapy. The current data for caplacizumab shows that it will be used as an adjunct to standard PE therapy, rather than as a replacement. How the drug is used in combination with current TTP treatments – such as corticosteroids, rituximab, bortezomib, vincristine, N-acetylcysteine, and splenectomy – should be evaluated to identify which treatment combinations not only improve platelet counts, but also reduce mortality and morbidity while remaining cost effective.
Dr. Ricci is a staff physician and Apheresis Director at the Taussig Cancer Institute at the Cleveland Clinic. She reported having no conflicts of interest.
Earlier this year, the Food and Drug Administration approved Cablivi (caplacizumab-yhdp) (Sanofi Genzyme, Cambridge, Mass.) for the treatment of acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), making it the first medication specifically indicated for the treatment of TTP.
The approval of caplacizumab and the clinical trial results that approval is based on are the most promising developments in the treatment of TTP since the introduction of plasma exchange (PE) therapy. However, many questions remain about how to best administer caplacizumab, specifically, which patients should receive it? Should all TTP patients start on caplacizumab therapy or should it be limited to patients with histories of TTP or those slow to respond to standard therapy with PE and immunosuppression?
TTP is a rare thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia caused by the inhibition of ADAMTS13, a metalloproteinase, which cleaves large-molecular-weight von Willebrand factor (vWF) multimers. Caplacizumab is a humanized bivalent, variable domain-only immunoglobulin fragment. The drug targets the A1 domain of vWF and inhibits the binding between vWF and the platelet glycoprotein Ib-IX-V receptor, preventing the formation of the microvascular thrombi and platelet loss associated with TTP.
FDA approval of caplacizumab came shortly after the publication of the results of the HERCULES trial in the New England Journal of Medicine by Marie Scully, MD, and her colleagues (N Engl J Med. 2019; 380[4]: 335-46).
HERCULES was an international phase 3, double blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of caplacizumab. In total, 145 patients participated in the trial. Caplacizumab or placebo were given in addition to standard therapy of plasma exchange (PE) and immunosuppression. Caplacizumab or placebo were administered as an intravenous loading dose prior to the first PE after randomization and subcutaneously once daily until 30 days after the last PE. All patients received daily PE until 2 days after platelet count normalization.
The primary measure of the study was the time to platelet count response of greater than 150 x 109/L following the cessation of daily PE. Secondary measures included TTP-related death; TTP relapse; major thromboembolic events; proportion of subjects with refractory TTP; normalization of organ damage markers including lactate dehydrogenase, cardiac troponin I, and serum creatinine; and other adverse events.
The authors found that the median time of normalization of the platelet count was shorter in the caplacizumab group, compared with placebo, with the caplacizumab group being 1.55 times more likely to have a normalized platelet count at any given time point in the study. While statistically significant differences were identified in the rate of platelet normalization, the median number of days of PE until normalization was only 2 days less in the caplacizumab group (five treatments) than in the placebo group (seven treatments), which may not be clinically significant for the treating physician.
In fact, the secondary endpoints of the study seem much more clinically promising in the treatment of TTP. The composite rate of TTP-related death, TTP recurrence, or major thromboembolic events during the treatment period was significantly lower in the caplacizumab group (12%) versus placebo (49%). No TTP-related deaths occurred in the caplacizumab group. The caplacizumab group was also statistically less likely to have a TTP exacerbation, defined as disease recurrence within 30 days from the last PE, than the placebo group.
End organ damage serum markers also improved faster in the caplacizumab group, although there was no significant difference between groups. Overall hospitalization (median of 9 vs. 12 days) and ICU stays (median of 3 vs. 5 days) were shorter in the caplacizumab group, compared with the placebo group.
While several relapses, defined as disease recurrence after 30 days from the last PE, occurred in the caplacizumab group, the relapses were only found in patients with ADAMTS13 activity of less than 10% at the end of the treatment period. Mild side effects, such as mucocutaneous bleeding were more frequent in the caplacizumab group. No major bleeding complications were observed.
The HERCULES trial generates more questions about the role of ADAMTS13 activity testing to monitor treatment response and to make therapy decisions. Extremely low ADAMTS13 activity levels at the cessation of therapy may be a sign of treatment inadequacy and may warrant closer follow-up of at-risk patients on caplacizumab.
Sanofi Genzyme estimates that the U.S. list price will be approximately $270,000 for a standard treatment course, according to a news release from the company. Whether payers will add it to formularies remains uncertain, but the high drug cost may be countered by potential savings in the reduction of hospital and ICU days with caplacizumab therapy. Sanofi Genzyme will also have a patient support program for eligible patients.
Caplacizumab has been approved in Europe since August 2018, but is not readily available in the United States. Given the dearth of clinical experience with the drug outside of the TITAN and HERCULES trials, strong recommendations for when and how to initiate therapy remain elusive.
As caplacizumab is further introduced into clinical practice, more studies are needed to identify which patient groups will benefit most from therapy. The current data for caplacizumab shows that it will be used as an adjunct to standard PE therapy, rather than as a replacement. How the drug is used in combination with current TTP treatments – such as corticosteroids, rituximab, bortezomib, vincristine, N-acetylcysteine, and splenectomy – should be evaluated to identify which treatment combinations not only improve platelet counts, but also reduce mortality and morbidity while remaining cost effective.
Dr. Ricci is a staff physician and Apheresis Director at the Taussig Cancer Institute at the Cleveland Clinic. She reported having no conflicts of interest.
For Latino patients, mental illness often goes untreated
Intergenerational trauma, attitudes can allow cycles of depression, anxiety to continue
The stigma tied to mental illness can be particularly difficult to overcome for people of Latin American descent, writes Concepción de León in El Espace, a column in the New York Times focused on news and culture relevant to Latinx communities. Sometimes those seeking help run into familiar mantras. “Let me know if any of these sound familiar: 'Boys don’t cry. We don’t air family business. You have to be strong. Turn to God.' These refrains (all of which I’ve heard at least once...) are just some of the responses that people dealing with mental health challenges in Latino communities have come to know well,” Ms. de León wrote. The unequal access to mental health services and health insurance that is a reality for some Latinos compounds the problem. The result is that mental illness can go untreated. Indeed, according to Ms. de León, Latinos, who are just as likely to suffer from a mental illness as non-Hispanic whites, are half as likely to seek treatment. Adriana Alejandre, a Latina who is a licensed marriage and family therapist in Los Angeles, is seeking to change that statistic. Through her podcast, Latinx Therapy, she seeks to spread the word that seeking therapy for mental illness is a positive step. There’s a long way to go, partly because Latino communities tend to value the group over the individual. “The downfall is that people suffer in silence,” said Ms. Alejandre. Therapy is important for some Latinos, according to Ms. Alejandre, because of intergenerational trauma that “allows the cycle to continue – whether it’s trauma, whether it’s depression, anxiety, domestic violence.” Ms. de León said one strategy she used for more than 1 year while she was in therapy was to set boundaries by not sharing what she was doing with family members. Ms. Alejandre said. “But the system will not change if someone does not initiate the change.” The New York Times.
Some state governments are seeking to make mental health services more available. The proposed budget of democratic Gov. Tony Evers of Wisconsin aims to allocate $22 million in mental health funding to school districts in the state to pay for social workers, psychologists, counselors, and nurses. The money would come on top of the $3 million designated by his predecessor and continues the efforts in Wisconsin to give children with mental health problems more access to needed help. The proposed budget also would add $7 million to a state program that works with local health agencies with the goal of providing mental health services for students and would allocate about $2.5 million annually for school staff training. The news is welcome to school districts across Wisconsin. “Schools are struggling to meet all of those [mental health] needs. I think there is an understanding that this is really something we need to be addressing,” said Joanne Juhnke, policy director at Wisconsin Family Ties, which helps families with children who have mental health challenges. Post Crescent, part of the USA Today network.
In Pennsylvania, the state Supreme Court is set to rule on whether those who provide mental health treatment to people addicted to illicit drugs can be free from prosecution. Right now, they are not. As reported in the Legal Intelligence, the case concerns two physicians at a drug addiction treatment facility who treated a man with an opioid addiction. In July 2018, a three-judge Superior Court panel upheld that physicians should not have liability protections under the Mental Health Procedures Act (MHPA). The ruling reversed a lower court decision. The Superior Court judges sympathized with the view that treatment of mental illness in drug treatment facilities be given more legal leeway. Whether that leeway remains in place depends on the Supreme Court. If judges decide no, physicians who recognize signs of mental illness in patients being treated for drug addiction would treat the illness at the risk of subsequent liability. The case has again raised the issue of whether alcoholism and drug dependency should be considered mental illnesses. “We don’t believe it was the intended purpose of the MPHA to include drug addiction. Our concern is we don’t want hospitals or rehab facilities just having patients be seen by psychiatrists in order to invoke the MHPA,” said Patrick Mintzer, the lawyer who will argue the cases before the court. A counter view came from Jack Panella, one of the three Superior Court judges. In his decision, he wrote: “In light of current scientific research, as well as the recent addition of ‘addiction disorders’ to the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual–5, we suggest that the Department of Human Services revise this definition.” The Legal Intelligence.
An op-ed in the Des Moines Register applauds republican Gov. Kim Reynolds for introducing two bills that are aimed at expanding mental health services to children and family in Iowa. “After decades of discussion and growing public support, these two bills take a huge step toward establishing a children’s mental health system,” wrote guest columnists Erin Drinnin of the United Way of Central Iowa and Kim Scorza of Seasons Center for Behavioral Health. The two also serve as cochairs of the Coalition to Advance Mental Health in Iowa for Kids (CAMHI4Kids), which includes more than 50 organizations. “Just like building a house requires a sturdy foundation, these bills are an important first step toward creating a structure for children’s mental well-being. In particular, CAMHI4Kids appreciates that these bills establish a voice and a seat for children and families at a regional level, using a system that is already in place,” wrote Ms. Drinnin and Ms. Scorza. The legislation would spell out the core services that would be available regardless of location in Iowa. The services would be geared toward children, rather than adults, reflecting the different mental health needs of children. “These important steps would finally sew together a patchwork of care that families currently must navigate with little direction. If a child is hurt on the playground, a caregiver knows to follow a clear path of care to help that child recover. But for a caregiver who is concerned about a child’s mental health, they often don’t know where to turn for help and must seek out services that might not exist in their community,” wrote Ms. Drinnin and Ms. Scorza. In Iowa, 80,000 children have a diagnosed serious emotional disturbance. About half of children aged 14 years and older with mental illness drop out of high school, and 70% of youth in Iowa’s juvenile justice system have a mental illness. “We are proud that Iowa is working together in a bipartisan way to ensure that our kids have the best start for future success,” wrote Ms. Drinnin and Ms. Scorza. Des Moines Register.
Bill Reilly is the peer support program manager for Bert Nash Community Mental Health Center in Douglas County, Kan. His mental health troubles began in childhood and led to stints in alcohol rehabilitation and mental hospitals, and he tried to end his life several times. But Mr. Reilly now offers his experience to those in trouble. “Those [experiences] can be viewed as a negative until you turn that conversation around and ask, ‘How can this be helpful to another person?’ And to me, that’s where the urgency comes into the work that we’re doing because a clinical relationship is one thing, but a peer support relationship is something different.” He was speaking in support of an initiative that seeks to train and place peer support people in hospital emergency departments in Kansas. The initiative is being spearheaded by Bob Tryanski, Douglas County director of behavioral health projects. “In addition to giving folks the opportunity to have the work experience in an environment where we need peer support, we would wrap around those peers with training, professional development, with coaching and support in an ongoing way,” Mr. Tryanski said, “so that they could become real, robust, huge resources, not just to the emergency department but in our community.” If approved, hiring and training of peers would begin in April, with the goal of having six people in place in emergency rooms by the summer and hiring an additional six people by year end. LJWorld.com.
Intergenerational trauma, attitudes can allow cycles of depression, anxiety to continue
Intergenerational trauma, attitudes can allow cycles of depression, anxiety to continue
The stigma tied to mental illness can be particularly difficult to overcome for people of Latin American descent, writes Concepción de León in El Espace, a column in the New York Times focused on news and culture relevant to Latinx communities. Sometimes those seeking help run into familiar mantras. “Let me know if any of these sound familiar: 'Boys don’t cry. We don’t air family business. You have to be strong. Turn to God.' These refrains (all of which I’ve heard at least once...) are just some of the responses that people dealing with mental health challenges in Latino communities have come to know well,” Ms. de León wrote. The unequal access to mental health services and health insurance that is a reality for some Latinos compounds the problem. The result is that mental illness can go untreated. Indeed, according to Ms. de León, Latinos, who are just as likely to suffer from a mental illness as non-Hispanic whites, are half as likely to seek treatment. Adriana Alejandre, a Latina who is a licensed marriage and family therapist in Los Angeles, is seeking to change that statistic. Through her podcast, Latinx Therapy, she seeks to spread the word that seeking therapy for mental illness is a positive step. There’s a long way to go, partly because Latino communities tend to value the group over the individual. “The downfall is that people suffer in silence,” said Ms. Alejandre. Therapy is important for some Latinos, according to Ms. Alejandre, because of intergenerational trauma that “allows the cycle to continue – whether it’s trauma, whether it’s depression, anxiety, domestic violence.” Ms. de León said one strategy she used for more than 1 year while she was in therapy was to set boundaries by not sharing what she was doing with family members. Ms. Alejandre said. “But the system will not change if someone does not initiate the change.” The New York Times.
Some state governments are seeking to make mental health services more available. The proposed budget of democratic Gov. Tony Evers of Wisconsin aims to allocate $22 million in mental health funding to school districts in the state to pay for social workers, psychologists, counselors, and nurses. The money would come on top of the $3 million designated by his predecessor and continues the efforts in Wisconsin to give children with mental health problems more access to needed help. The proposed budget also would add $7 million to a state program that works with local health agencies with the goal of providing mental health services for students and would allocate about $2.5 million annually for school staff training. The news is welcome to school districts across Wisconsin. “Schools are struggling to meet all of those [mental health] needs. I think there is an understanding that this is really something we need to be addressing,” said Joanne Juhnke, policy director at Wisconsin Family Ties, which helps families with children who have mental health challenges. Post Crescent, part of the USA Today network.
In Pennsylvania, the state Supreme Court is set to rule on whether those who provide mental health treatment to people addicted to illicit drugs can be free from prosecution. Right now, they are not. As reported in the Legal Intelligence, the case concerns two physicians at a drug addiction treatment facility who treated a man with an opioid addiction. In July 2018, a three-judge Superior Court panel upheld that physicians should not have liability protections under the Mental Health Procedures Act (MHPA). The ruling reversed a lower court decision. The Superior Court judges sympathized with the view that treatment of mental illness in drug treatment facilities be given more legal leeway. Whether that leeway remains in place depends on the Supreme Court. If judges decide no, physicians who recognize signs of mental illness in patients being treated for drug addiction would treat the illness at the risk of subsequent liability. The case has again raised the issue of whether alcoholism and drug dependency should be considered mental illnesses. “We don’t believe it was the intended purpose of the MPHA to include drug addiction. Our concern is we don’t want hospitals or rehab facilities just having patients be seen by psychiatrists in order to invoke the MHPA,” said Patrick Mintzer, the lawyer who will argue the cases before the court. A counter view came from Jack Panella, one of the three Superior Court judges. In his decision, he wrote: “In light of current scientific research, as well as the recent addition of ‘addiction disorders’ to the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual–5, we suggest that the Department of Human Services revise this definition.” The Legal Intelligence.
An op-ed in the Des Moines Register applauds republican Gov. Kim Reynolds for introducing two bills that are aimed at expanding mental health services to children and family in Iowa. “After decades of discussion and growing public support, these two bills take a huge step toward establishing a children’s mental health system,” wrote guest columnists Erin Drinnin of the United Way of Central Iowa and Kim Scorza of Seasons Center for Behavioral Health. The two also serve as cochairs of the Coalition to Advance Mental Health in Iowa for Kids (CAMHI4Kids), which includes more than 50 organizations. “Just like building a house requires a sturdy foundation, these bills are an important first step toward creating a structure for children’s mental well-being. In particular, CAMHI4Kids appreciates that these bills establish a voice and a seat for children and families at a regional level, using a system that is already in place,” wrote Ms. Drinnin and Ms. Scorza. The legislation would spell out the core services that would be available regardless of location in Iowa. The services would be geared toward children, rather than adults, reflecting the different mental health needs of children. “These important steps would finally sew together a patchwork of care that families currently must navigate with little direction. If a child is hurt on the playground, a caregiver knows to follow a clear path of care to help that child recover. But for a caregiver who is concerned about a child’s mental health, they often don’t know where to turn for help and must seek out services that might not exist in their community,” wrote Ms. Drinnin and Ms. Scorza. In Iowa, 80,000 children have a diagnosed serious emotional disturbance. About half of children aged 14 years and older with mental illness drop out of high school, and 70% of youth in Iowa’s juvenile justice system have a mental illness. “We are proud that Iowa is working together in a bipartisan way to ensure that our kids have the best start for future success,” wrote Ms. Drinnin and Ms. Scorza. Des Moines Register.
Bill Reilly is the peer support program manager for Bert Nash Community Mental Health Center in Douglas County, Kan. His mental health troubles began in childhood and led to stints in alcohol rehabilitation and mental hospitals, and he tried to end his life several times. But Mr. Reilly now offers his experience to those in trouble. “Those [experiences] can be viewed as a negative until you turn that conversation around and ask, ‘How can this be helpful to another person?’ And to me, that’s where the urgency comes into the work that we’re doing because a clinical relationship is one thing, but a peer support relationship is something different.” He was speaking in support of an initiative that seeks to train and place peer support people in hospital emergency departments in Kansas. The initiative is being spearheaded by Bob Tryanski, Douglas County director of behavioral health projects. “In addition to giving folks the opportunity to have the work experience in an environment where we need peer support, we would wrap around those peers with training, professional development, with coaching and support in an ongoing way,” Mr. Tryanski said, “so that they could become real, robust, huge resources, not just to the emergency department but in our community.” If approved, hiring and training of peers would begin in April, with the goal of having six people in place in emergency rooms by the summer and hiring an additional six people by year end. LJWorld.com.
The stigma tied to mental illness can be particularly difficult to overcome for people of Latin American descent, writes Concepción de León in El Espace, a column in the New York Times focused on news and culture relevant to Latinx communities. Sometimes those seeking help run into familiar mantras. “Let me know if any of these sound familiar: 'Boys don’t cry. We don’t air family business. You have to be strong. Turn to God.' These refrains (all of which I’ve heard at least once...) are just some of the responses that people dealing with mental health challenges in Latino communities have come to know well,” Ms. de León wrote. The unequal access to mental health services and health insurance that is a reality for some Latinos compounds the problem. The result is that mental illness can go untreated. Indeed, according to Ms. de León, Latinos, who are just as likely to suffer from a mental illness as non-Hispanic whites, are half as likely to seek treatment. Adriana Alejandre, a Latina who is a licensed marriage and family therapist in Los Angeles, is seeking to change that statistic. Through her podcast, Latinx Therapy, she seeks to spread the word that seeking therapy for mental illness is a positive step. There’s a long way to go, partly because Latino communities tend to value the group over the individual. “The downfall is that people suffer in silence,” said Ms. Alejandre. Therapy is important for some Latinos, according to Ms. Alejandre, because of intergenerational trauma that “allows the cycle to continue – whether it’s trauma, whether it’s depression, anxiety, domestic violence.” Ms. de León said one strategy she used for more than 1 year while she was in therapy was to set boundaries by not sharing what she was doing with family members. Ms. Alejandre said. “But the system will not change if someone does not initiate the change.” The New York Times.
Some state governments are seeking to make mental health services more available. The proposed budget of democratic Gov. Tony Evers of Wisconsin aims to allocate $22 million in mental health funding to school districts in the state to pay for social workers, psychologists, counselors, and nurses. The money would come on top of the $3 million designated by his predecessor and continues the efforts in Wisconsin to give children with mental health problems more access to needed help. The proposed budget also would add $7 million to a state program that works with local health agencies with the goal of providing mental health services for students and would allocate about $2.5 million annually for school staff training. The news is welcome to school districts across Wisconsin. “Schools are struggling to meet all of those [mental health] needs. I think there is an understanding that this is really something we need to be addressing,” said Joanne Juhnke, policy director at Wisconsin Family Ties, which helps families with children who have mental health challenges. Post Crescent, part of the USA Today network.
In Pennsylvania, the state Supreme Court is set to rule on whether those who provide mental health treatment to people addicted to illicit drugs can be free from prosecution. Right now, they are not. As reported in the Legal Intelligence, the case concerns two physicians at a drug addiction treatment facility who treated a man with an opioid addiction. In July 2018, a three-judge Superior Court panel upheld that physicians should not have liability protections under the Mental Health Procedures Act (MHPA). The ruling reversed a lower court decision. The Superior Court judges sympathized with the view that treatment of mental illness in drug treatment facilities be given more legal leeway. Whether that leeway remains in place depends on the Supreme Court. If judges decide no, physicians who recognize signs of mental illness in patients being treated for drug addiction would treat the illness at the risk of subsequent liability. The case has again raised the issue of whether alcoholism and drug dependency should be considered mental illnesses. “We don’t believe it was the intended purpose of the MPHA to include drug addiction. Our concern is we don’t want hospitals or rehab facilities just having patients be seen by psychiatrists in order to invoke the MHPA,” said Patrick Mintzer, the lawyer who will argue the cases before the court. A counter view came from Jack Panella, one of the three Superior Court judges. In his decision, he wrote: “In light of current scientific research, as well as the recent addition of ‘addiction disorders’ to the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual–5, we suggest that the Department of Human Services revise this definition.” The Legal Intelligence.
An op-ed in the Des Moines Register applauds republican Gov. Kim Reynolds for introducing two bills that are aimed at expanding mental health services to children and family in Iowa. “After decades of discussion and growing public support, these two bills take a huge step toward establishing a children’s mental health system,” wrote guest columnists Erin Drinnin of the United Way of Central Iowa and Kim Scorza of Seasons Center for Behavioral Health. The two also serve as cochairs of the Coalition to Advance Mental Health in Iowa for Kids (CAMHI4Kids), which includes more than 50 organizations. “Just like building a house requires a sturdy foundation, these bills are an important first step toward creating a structure for children’s mental well-being. In particular, CAMHI4Kids appreciates that these bills establish a voice and a seat for children and families at a regional level, using a system that is already in place,” wrote Ms. Drinnin and Ms. Scorza. The legislation would spell out the core services that would be available regardless of location in Iowa. The services would be geared toward children, rather than adults, reflecting the different mental health needs of children. “These important steps would finally sew together a patchwork of care that families currently must navigate with little direction. If a child is hurt on the playground, a caregiver knows to follow a clear path of care to help that child recover. But for a caregiver who is concerned about a child’s mental health, they often don’t know where to turn for help and must seek out services that might not exist in their community,” wrote Ms. Drinnin and Ms. Scorza. In Iowa, 80,000 children have a diagnosed serious emotional disturbance. About half of children aged 14 years and older with mental illness drop out of high school, and 70% of youth in Iowa’s juvenile justice system have a mental illness. “We are proud that Iowa is working together in a bipartisan way to ensure that our kids have the best start for future success,” wrote Ms. Drinnin and Ms. Scorza. Des Moines Register.
Bill Reilly is the peer support program manager for Bert Nash Community Mental Health Center in Douglas County, Kan. His mental health troubles began in childhood and led to stints in alcohol rehabilitation and mental hospitals, and he tried to end his life several times. But Mr. Reilly now offers his experience to those in trouble. “Those [experiences] can be viewed as a negative until you turn that conversation around and ask, ‘How can this be helpful to another person?’ And to me, that’s where the urgency comes into the work that we’re doing because a clinical relationship is one thing, but a peer support relationship is something different.” He was speaking in support of an initiative that seeks to train and place peer support people in hospital emergency departments in Kansas. The initiative is being spearheaded by Bob Tryanski, Douglas County director of behavioral health projects. “In addition to giving folks the opportunity to have the work experience in an environment where we need peer support, we would wrap around those peers with training, professional development, with coaching and support in an ongoing way,” Mr. Tryanski said, “so that they could become real, robust, huge resources, not just to the emergency department but in our community.” If approved, hiring and training of peers would begin in April, with the goal of having six people in place in emergency rooms by the summer and hiring an additional six people by year end. LJWorld.com.
Up-close view of climate change proves sobering
Dr. Carl Bell steps away from American College of Psychiatrists meeting and gets a jolt
It used to be difficult to conceive of writing about climate change in light of the illnesses we psychiatrists treat. But talking about climate change has become unavoidable. Sometimes, it seems that things weigh heavy on my heart, and I have to write about them – especially when it is serious.
David Alan Pollack, MD, has been talking about climate change for some years now, and while I understood his concern, I had yet to see the psychological effects up close and personal. After all, I live in Chicago, and we are surrounded by concrete and asphalt.
Thankfully, I also travel, and I get a chance to get into nature. While in Hawaii at the American College of Psychiatrists annual meeting in February, I went snorkeling in Hanauma Bay. I saw coral and fish. The problem is I have a very vivid memories of snorkeling in that exact same nature preserve, which also was a Marine Life Conservation District in 1972 while I was attending the American Psychiatric Association annual meeting.
The contrast between the two experiences leaves me with a glum, sad, disappointed, heart-broken feeling because it was an intimate and personal experience with climate change. In 1972, I saw every type of coral imaginable: brain coral, club finger coral, elk coral, great star coral, pillar coral, staghorn coral, table coral, and tube coral. If I remember correctly, there were corky sea fingers and sea fans, but not sea turtles. In 1972, I saw bigeyefish, damselfish, doctorfish, filefish, goatfish, gobies, hogfish, lemon butterflyfish, lizardfish, parrottfish, porcupinefish, pufferfish, queen angelfish, rock beauties, sergeant majors, soldierfish, spot-tail spot-tail butterflyfish, Spanish hogfish, squirrelfish, tangs, trunkfish, or any bluehead or yellowhead wrasses.
In 2019, I saw two pieces of coral less that 9 inches in diameter and not a single sea urchin. There were maybe three types of tropical fish that I was unfamiliar with seeing. The difference between what I saw in 1972 and what I saw in 2019 was like the difference between the rain forest in Puerto Rico and the dunes of the Sahara Desert.
Sure, I have heard David talk about the mental health effects of climate change on stress, anxiety, and depression, and I have always thought that he was right. But to see climate change up close and personal is a sobering experience. I apologize to them for being part of the system and process that is destroying the planet – and leaving them with a hot mess.
At this point, it seems to me that we cannot just try to save the planet by being better stewards of our garbage and pointing out measurable indicators of climate change. We need to actively rather than passively try to save the planet. Of course, the question is who will pay for the active efforts to depollute Earth. From what I saw for myself in Hanauma Bay, I don’t think we have much time. So I am hoping that more people will take the issue of climate change seriously.
Dr. Bell is a staff psychiatrist at Jackson Park Hospital’s Medical/Surgical-Psychiatry Inpatient Unit in Chicago, clinical psychiatrist emeritus in the department of psychiatry at the University of Illinois at Chicago, former president/CEO of Community Mental Health Council, and former director of the Institute for Juvenile Research (birthplace of child psychiatry), also in Chicago. Check out Dr. Bell’s new book, “Fetal Alcohol Exposure in the African-American Community,” at https://thirdworldpressfoundation.org/product/pre-order-fetal-alcohol-exposure-in-the-african-american-community/.
Dr. Carl Bell steps away from American College of Psychiatrists meeting and gets a jolt
Dr. Carl Bell steps away from American College of Psychiatrists meeting and gets a jolt
It used to be difficult to conceive of writing about climate change in light of the illnesses we psychiatrists treat. But talking about climate change has become unavoidable. Sometimes, it seems that things weigh heavy on my heart, and I have to write about them – especially when it is serious.
David Alan Pollack, MD, has been talking about climate change for some years now, and while I understood his concern, I had yet to see the psychological effects up close and personal. After all, I live in Chicago, and we are surrounded by concrete and asphalt.
Thankfully, I also travel, and I get a chance to get into nature. While in Hawaii at the American College of Psychiatrists annual meeting in February, I went snorkeling in Hanauma Bay. I saw coral and fish. The problem is I have a very vivid memories of snorkeling in that exact same nature preserve, which also was a Marine Life Conservation District in 1972 while I was attending the American Psychiatric Association annual meeting.
The contrast between the two experiences leaves me with a glum, sad, disappointed, heart-broken feeling because it was an intimate and personal experience with climate change. In 1972, I saw every type of coral imaginable: brain coral, club finger coral, elk coral, great star coral, pillar coral, staghorn coral, table coral, and tube coral. If I remember correctly, there were corky sea fingers and sea fans, but not sea turtles. In 1972, I saw bigeyefish, damselfish, doctorfish, filefish, goatfish, gobies, hogfish, lemon butterflyfish, lizardfish, parrottfish, porcupinefish, pufferfish, queen angelfish, rock beauties, sergeant majors, soldierfish, spot-tail spot-tail butterflyfish, Spanish hogfish, squirrelfish, tangs, trunkfish, or any bluehead or yellowhead wrasses.
In 2019, I saw two pieces of coral less that 9 inches in diameter and not a single sea urchin. There were maybe three types of tropical fish that I was unfamiliar with seeing. The difference between what I saw in 1972 and what I saw in 2019 was like the difference between the rain forest in Puerto Rico and the dunes of the Sahara Desert.
Sure, I have heard David talk about the mental health effects of climate change on stress, anxiety, and depression, and I have always thought that he was right. But to see climate change up close and personal is a sobering experience. I apologize to them for being part of the system and process that is destroying the planet – and leaving them with a hot mess.
At this point, it seems to me that we cannot just try to save the planet by being better stewards of our garbage and pointing out measurable indicators of climate change. We need to actively rather than passively try to save the planet. Of course, the question is who will pay for the active efforts to depollute Earth. From what I saw for myself in Hanauma Bay, I don’t think we have much time. So I am hoping that more people will take the issue of climate change seriously.
Dr. Bell is a staff psychiatrist at Jackson Park Hospital’s Medical/Surgical-Psychiatry Inpatient Unit in Chicago, clinical psychiatrist emeritus in the department of psychiatry at the University of Illinois at Chicago, former president/CEO of Community Mental Health Council, and former director of the Institute for Juvenile Research (birthplace of child psychiatry), also in Chicago. Check out Dr. Bell’s new book, “Fetal Alcohol Exposure in the African-American Community,” at https://thirdworldpressfoundation.org/product/pre-order-fetal-alcohol-exposure-in-the-african-american-community/.
It used to be difficult to conceive of writing about climate change in light of the illnesses we psychiatrists treat. But talking about climate change has become unavoidable. Sometimes, it seems that things weigh heavy on my heart, and I have to write about them – especially when it is serious.
David Alan Pollack, MD, has been talking about climate change for some years now, and while I understood his concern, I had yet to see the psychological effects up close and personal. After all, I live in Chicago, and we are surrounded by concrete and asphalt.
Thankfully, I also travel, and I get a chance to get into nature. While in Hawaii at the American College of Psychiatrists annual meeting in February, I went snorkeling in Hanauma Bay. I saw coral and fish. The problem is I have a very vivid memories of snorkeling in that exact same nature preserve, which also was a Marine Life Conservation District in 1972 while I was attending the American Psychiatric Association annual meeting.
The contrast between the two experiences leaves me with a glum, sad, disappointed, heart-broken feeling because it was an intimate and personal experience with climate change. In 1972, I saw every type of coral imaginable: brain coral, club finger coral, elk coral, great star coral, pillar coral, staghorn coral, table coral, and tube coral. If I remember correctly, there were corky sea fingers and sea fans, but not sea turtles. In 1972, I saw bigeyefish, damselfish, doctorfish, filefish, goatfish, gobies, hogfish, lemon butterflyfish, lizardfish, parrottfish, porcupinefish, pufferfish, queen angelfish, rock beauties, sergeant majors, soldierfish, spot-tail spot-tail butterflyfish, Spanish hogfish, squirrelfish, tangs, trunkfish, or any bluehead or yellowhead wrasses.
In 2019, I saw two pieces of coral less that 9 inches in diameter and not a single sea urchin. There were maybe three types of tropical fish that I was unfamiliar with seeing. The difference between what I saw in 1972 and what I saw in 2019 was like the difference between the rain forest in Puerto Rico and the dunes of the Sahara Desert.
Sure, I have heard David talk about the mental health effects of climate change on stress, anxiety, and depression, and I have always thought that he was right. But to see climate change up close and personal is a sobering experience. I apologize to them for being part of the system and process that is destroying the planet – and leaving them with a hot mess.
At this point, it seems to me that we cannot just try to save the planet by being better stewards of our garbage and pointing out measurable indicators of climate change. We need to actively rather than passively try to save the planet. Of course, the question is who will pay for the active efforts to depollute Earth. From what I saw for myself in Hanauma Bay, I don’t think we have much time. So I am hoping that more people will take the issue of climate change seriously.
Dr. Bell is a staff psychiatrist at Jackson Park Hospital’s Medical/Surgical-Psychiatry Inpatient Unit in Chicago, clinical psychiatrist emeritus in the department of psychiatry at the University of Illinois at Chicago, former president/CEO of Community Mental Health Council, and former director of the Institute for Juvenile Research (birthplace of child psychiatry), also in Chicago. Check out Dr. Bell’s new book, “Fetal Alcohol Exposure in the African-American Community,” at https://thirdworldpressfoundation.org/product/pre-order-fetal-alcohol-exposure-in-the-african-american-community/.
‘The birth of a mother is a complex process’
Softening the blow to women and families of severe perinatal, postpartum psychiatric disorders
Editor’s Note: Alison M. Heru, MD, the Families in Psychiatry columnist, invited Dr. Reinstein to address this topic.
“But this was not what I expected!” That’s a statement I have heard from countless new mothers.
Women often envision pregnancy and the postpartum period as a time of pure joy. The glow of an expectant woman and the excitement of the arrival of a new baby masks the reality that many women struggle emotionally when transitioning to motherhood. Like the birth of a child, the birth of a mother is a complex process. Upholding the myth that all women seamlessly transform into mothers can have devastating effects and hinder access to mental health care.
As a psychiatrist working on a women’s inpatient unit with a perinatal program, I treat women at times of crisis. What may have begun as mild anxiety or depression sometimes quickly spirals into severe psychiatric illness. The sheer force of these severe perinatal and postpartum psychiatric disorders often leaves women and families shocked and confused, wondering what happened to their crumbled dreams of early motherhood.
What must general psychiatrists know about perinatal and postpartum psychiatric disorders? Why is maternal mental health so important? What are the barriers to treatment for these women? How can general psychiatrists best support and treat these new mothers and their families?
What data show
Maternal depression is now known to be one of the most common complications of pregnancy. Studies have suggested that about 11% of women experience depression during pregnancy1 and approximately 17% of women are depressed in the postpartum period.2 Perinatal generalized anxiety disorder has been shown to have a prevalence of 8.5%-10.5% during pregnancy with a wider variance post partum.3 Approximately 3% of women in the general community develop PTSD symptoms following childbirth.4 Research suggests that about 2% of women develop obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms in the postpartum period.5 Postpartum psychosis, a rare but potentially devastating illness, occurs after 0.1%-0.2% of births.6
Importance of maternal mental health
There is a growing body of literature supporting both obstetric and pediatric adverse outcomes related to untreated psychiatric illness. Untreated maternal depression has been associated with obstetric complications, such as preterm delivery, preeclampsia, low birth weight, as well as the child’s developing cognitive function.7 Anxiety during pregnancy has been associated with both a shorter gestational period and adverse implications for fetal neurodevelopment.
These adverse effects were found to be even more potent in “pregnancy anxiety,” or anxiety specifically focused on the pregnancy, the birth experience, and the transition to motherhood.8 The psychotic symptoms occurring during postpartum psychosis can jeopardize the lives of both a woman and her child and carries a 4% risk of infanticide.9 Although there are limited data about the long-term effects of postpartum obsessive-compulsive disorders and PTSD, it is reasonable to assume that they might carry negative long-term implications for the mother and possibly her child.
Barriers to treatment
Despite the significant rates of mental illness, pregnant and new mothers often face barriers to receiving treatment. Many psychiatrists are hesitant to prescribe psychiatric medication to pregnant women because of concerns about teratogenic potential of psychiatric medications; similar concerns exist for newborn babies when prescribing medications to lactating mothers. In addition, the field of reproductive psychiatry is evolving at a rapid pace, making it difficult for busy psychiatrists to keep up with the ever-growing literature.
Also, it is hard to imagine a population that has more barriers to attending outpatient appointments. For many new mothers, the exhaustion and all-consuming work involved with taking care of a newborn are insurmountable barriers to obtaining mental health care. In addition, despite the awareness that new mothers often are more emotional, families can be slow to recognize the developing severity of a psychiatric illness during the peripartum and postpartum periods.
Supporting and treating new mothers
As general psychiatrists, there are several ways to directly help these women.
1. Expect the expected. Even in women with no prior psychiatric history, a significant percentage of expectant and postpartum women will develop acute psychiatric symptoms. Learn about the different presentations and treatments of perinatal and postpartum psychiatric disorders. For example, a woman might have thoughts of harming her baby in both postpartum psychosis and obsessive-compulsive disorder. However, the acuity and treatment of these two conditions drastically differ.
2. Learn more about psychiatric medications. Several apps and websites are available to psychiatrists to learn about the safety profile of psychiatric medications, such as Reprotox.org, mothertobaby.org, lactmed, and womensmentalhealth.org. Many medications are considered to be relatively safe during pregnancy and breastfeeding. It is important for psychiatrists to appreciate the risks when choosing not to prescribe to pregnant and postpartum women. Sometimes a known risk of a specific medication may be preferable to the unknown risk of leaving a woman susceptible to a severe psychiatric decompensation.
3. Involve all members of the family. A mother’s mental health has significant implications for the entire family. Psychoeducation for the family as well as frequent family sessions are key tools when treating this population. In addition, prescribing to pregnant women provides the opportunity for a psychiatrist to refine skills in joint decision making; it is crucial to involve both a patient and her spouse when discussing psychiatric medications.
4. Provide ready access and collaborate care. It is important to understand the potential rapid onset of psychiatric symptoms during the pregnancy and postpartum period. Psychiatrists should be prepared to collaborate care with other specialties. It is important to establish relationships with community psychotherapists specializing in maternal mental health, pediatricians, as well as obstetricians.
5. Learn when to seek a higher level of care. Although many women with perinatal and postpartum psychiatric symptoms can be managed as outpatients, women at times need a higher level of care. Similar to general psychiatry, women who are acutely suicidal or homicidal or have a sudden onset of psychotic and manic symptoms all should be evaluated immediately for inpatient hospitalization. Women with less severe symptoms but who require a higher level of care than typically offered in standard outpatient treatment should be candidates for partial hospitalization programs.
General intensive programs usually can accommodate these women, but it is ideal to refer this population to perinatal intensive programs. Postpartum Support International (postpartum.net) lists the nationwide inpatient and partial perinatal programs as well as regional and local services. An example of inpatient perinatal care is the women’s unit at Zucker Hillside Hospital (Northwell Health System, Glen Oaks, N.Y.), which houses an inpatient perinatal program. As a psychiatrist on the unit, I treat acute symptoms such as depression, anxiety, psychosis, mania, and catatonia that occur during the perinatal and postpartum periods. Given the severity of symptoms, I use a wide range of psychiatric medications with the possibility of electroconvulsive therapy when indicated. Psychotherapy staff on the unit offer specialized perinatal, mothers, and dialectical behavioral therapy groups. Breast pumps are available for women who wish to breastfeed. Accommodations are made for babies and children to visit their mother when clinically appropriate. Once discharged, women often are referred to Zucker Hillside’s own perinatal outpatient clinic for continued treatment. Similar models exist in select inpatient units as well as an increasing number of partial programs across the United States.
Conclusion
Psychiatric care for pregnant and new mothers can be challenging, but it is also immensely rewarding. Restoring a mother’s mental health usually leads to increased emotional stability for her entire family. Given the prevalence of maternal mental health disorders, psychiatrists in nearly every setting will encounter this population of women. With dedicated time devoted to reviewing the literature and learning about local resources, psychiatrists can feel comfortable treating women throughout the childbearing experience.
References
1. J Affect Disord. 2017 Sep;219:86-92.
2. J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Sep;104:235-48.
3. J Womens Health. (Larchmt). 2015 Sep;24(9):762-70.
4. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Jul;34(5):389-401.
5. Compr Psychiatry. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):503-9.
6. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;15(3):231-42.
7. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;61(3):533-43.
8. Curr Opinion Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;25(2):141-8.
9. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;166(4):405-8.
Dr. Reinstein is a psychiatry attending at Zucker Hillside Hospital. Her clinical interests include reproductive psychiatry and family therapy, with a specific focus on maternal mental health. Dr. Reinstein completed her adult psychiatry residency training at Montefiore Hospital/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, after graduating from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Yeshiva University, New York, with a BA in biology. She is one of the recipients of the 4th Annual Resident Recognition Award for Excellence in Family Oriented Care.
Softening the blow to women and families of severe perinatal, postpartum psychiatric disorders
Softening the blow to women and families of severe perinatal, postpartum psychiatric disorders
Editor’s Note: Alison M. Heru, MD, the Families in Psychiatry columnist, invited Dr. Reinstein to address this topic.
“But this was not what I expected!” That’s a statement I have heard from countless new mothers.
Women often envision pregnancy and the postpartum period as a time of pure joy. The glow of an expectant woman and the excitement of the arrival of a new baby masks the reality that many women struggle emotionally when transitioning to motherhood. Like the birth of a child, the birth of a mother is a complex process. Upholding the myth that all women seamlessly transform into mothers can have devastating effects and hinder access to mental health care.
As a psychiatrist working on a women’s inpatient unit with a perinatal program, I treat women at times of crisis. What may have begun as mild anxiety or depression sometimes quickly spirals into severe psychiatric illness. The sheer force of these severe perinatal and postpartum psychiatric disorders often leaves women and families shocked and confused, wondering what happened to their crumbled dreams of early motherhood.
What must general psychiatrists know about perinatal and postpartum psychiatric disorders? Why is maternal mental health so important? What are the barriers to treatment for these women? How can general psychiatrists best support and treat these new mothers and their families?
What data show
Maternal depression is now known to be one of the most common complications of pregnancy. Studies have suggested that about 11% of women experience depression during pregnancy1 and approximately 17% of women are depressed in the postpartum period.2 Perinatal generalized anxiety disorder has been shown to have a prevalence of 8.5%-10.5% during pregnancy with a wider variance post partum.3 Approximately 3% of women in the general community develop PTSD symptoms following childbirth.4 Research suggests that about 2% of women develop obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms in the postpartum period.5 Postpartum psychosis, a rare but potentially devastating illness, occurs after 0.1%-0.2% of births.6
Importance of maternal mental health
There is a growing body of literature supporting both obstetric and pediatric adverse outcomes related to untreated psychiatric illness. Untreated maternal depression has been associated with obstetric complications, such as preterm delivery, preeclampsia, low birth weight, as well as the child’s developing cognitive function.7 Anxiety during pregnancy has been associated with both a shorter gestational period and adverse implications for fetal neurodevelopment.
These adverse effects were found to be even more potent in “pregnancy anxiety,” or anxiety specifically focused on the pregnancy, the birth experience, and the transition to motherhood.8 The psychotic symptoms occurring during postpartum psychosis can jeopardize the lives of both a woman and her child and carries a 4% risk of infanticide.9 Although there are limited data about the long-term effects of postpartum obsessive-compulsive disorders and PTSD, it is reasonable to assume that they might carry negative long-term implications for the mother and possibly her child.
Barriers to treatment
Despite the significant rates of mental illness, pregnant and new mothers often face barriers to receiving treatment. Many psychiatrists are hesitant to prescribe psychiatric medication to pregnant women because of concerns about teratogenic potential of psychiatric medications; similar concerns exist for newborn babies when prescribing medications to lactating mothers. In addition, the field of reproductive psychiatry is evolving at a rapid pace, making it difficult for busy psychiatrists to keep up with the ever-growing literature.
Also, it is hard to imagine a population that has more barriers to attending outpatient appointments. For many new mothers, the exhaustion and all-consuming work involved with taking care of a newborn are insurmountable barriers to obtaining mental health care. In addition, despite the awareness that new mothers often are more emotional, families can be slow to recognize the developing severity of a psychiatric illness during the peripartum and postpartum periods.
Supporting and treating new mothers
As general psychiatrists, there are several ways to directly help these women.
1. Expect the expected. Even in women with no prior psychiatric history, a significant percentage of expectant and postpartum women will develop acute psychiatric symptoms. Learn about the different presentations and treatments of perinatal and postpartum psychiatric disorders. For example, a woman might have thoughts of harming her baby in both postpartum psychosis and obsessive-compulsive disorder. However, the acuity and treatment of these two conditions drastically differ.
2. Learn more about psychiatric medications. Several apps and websites are available to psychiatrists to learn about the safety profile of psychiatric medications, such as Reprotox.org, mothertobaby.org, lactmed, and womensmentalhealth.org. Many medications are considered to be relatively safe during pregnancy and breastfeeding. It is important for psychiatrists to appreciate the risks when choosing not to prescribe to pregnant and postpartum women. Sometimes a known risk of a specific medication may be preferable to the unknown risk of leaving a woman susceptible to a severe psychiatric decompensation.
3. Involve all members of the family. A mother’s mental health has significant implications for the entire family. Psychoeducation for the family as well as frequent family sessions are key tools when treating this population. In addition, prescribing to pregnant women provides the opportunity for a psychiatrist to refine skills in joint decision making; it is crucial to involve both a patient and her spouse when discussing psychiatric medications.
4. Provide ready access and collaborate care. It is important to understand the potential rapid onset of psychiatric symptoms during the pregnancy and postpartum period. Psychiatrists should be prepared to collaborate care with other specialties. It is important to establish relationships with community psychotherapists specializing in maternal mental health, pediatricians, as well as obstetricians.
5. Learn when to seek a higher level of care. Although many women with perinatal and postpartum psychiatric symptoms can be managed as outpatients, women at times need a higher level of care. Similar to general psychiatry, women who are acutely suicidal or homicidal or have a sudden onset of psychotic and manic symptoms all should be evaluated immediately for inpatient hospitalization. Women with less severe symptoms but who require a higher level of care than typically offered in standard outpatient treatment should be candidates for partial hospitalization programs.
General intensive programs usually can accommodate these women, but it is ideal to refer this population to perinatal intensive programs. Postpartum Support International (postpartum.net) lists the nationwide inpatient and partial perinatal programs as well as regional and local services. An example of inpatient perinatal care is the women’s unit at Zucker Hillside Hospital (Northwell Health System, Glen Oaks, N.Y.), which houses an inpatient perinatal program. As a psychiatrist on the unit, I treat acute symptoms such as depression, anxiety, psychosis, mania, and catatonia that occur during the perinatal and postpartum periods. Given the severity of symptoms, I use a wide range of psychiatric medications with the possibility of electroconvulsive therapy when indicated. Psychotherapy staff on the unit offer specialized perinatal, mothers, and dialectical behavioral therapy groups. Breast pumps are available for women who wish to breastfeed. Accommodations are made for babies and children to visit their mother when clinically appropriate. Once discharged, women often are referred to Zucker Hillside’s own perinatal outpatient clinic for continued treatment. Similar models exist in select inpatient units as well as an increasing number of partial programs across the United States.
Conclusion
Psychiatric care for pregnant and new mothers can be challenging, but it is also immensely rewarding. Restoring a mother’s mental health usually leads to increased emotional stability for her entire family. Given the prevalence of maternal mental health disorders, psychiatrists in nearly every setting will encounter this population of women. With dedicated time devoted to reviewing the literature and learning about local resources, psychiatrists can feel comfortable treating women throughout the childbearing experience.
References
1. J Affect Disord. 2017 Sep;219:86-92.
2. J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Sep;104:235-48.
3. J Womens Health. (Larchmt). 2015 Sep;24(9):762-70.
4. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Jul;34(5):389-401.
5. Compr Psychiatry. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):503-9.
6. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;15(3):231-42.
7. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;61(3):533-43.
8. Curr Opinion Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;25(2):141-8.
9. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;166(4):405-8.
Dr. Reinstein is a psychiatry attending at Zucker Hillside Hospital. Her clinical interests include reproductive psychiatry and family therapy, with a specific focus on maternal mental health. Dr. Reinstein completed her adult psychiatry residency training at Montefiore Hospital/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, after graduating from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Yeshiva University, New York, with a BA in biology. She is one of the recipients of the 4th Annual Resident Recognition Award for Excellence in Family Oriented Care.
Editor’s Note: Alison M. Heru, MD, the Families in Psychiatry columnist, invited Dr. Reinstein to address this topic.
“But this was not what I expected!” That’s a statement I have heard from countless new mothers.
Women often envision pregnancy and the postpartum period as a time of pure joy. The glow of an expectant woman and the excitement of the arrival of a new baby masks the reality that many women struggle emotionally when transitioning to motherhood. Like the birth of a child, the birth of a mother is a complex process. Upholding the myth that all women seamlessly transform into mothers can have devastating effects and hinder access to mental health care.
As a psychiatrist working on a women’s inpatient unit with a perinatal program, I treat women at times of crisis. What may have begun as mild anxiety or depression sometimes quickly spirals into severe psychiatric illness. The sheer force of these severe perinatal and postpartum psychiatric disorders often leaves women and families shocked and confused, wondering what happened to their crumbled dreams of early motherhood.
What must general psychiatrists know about perinatal and postpartum psychiatric disorders? Why is maternal mental health so important? What are the barriers to treatment for these women? How can general psychiatrists best support and treat these new mothers and their families?
What data show
Maternal depression is now known to be one of the most common complications of pregnancy. Studies have suggested that about 11% of women experience depression during pregnancy1 and approximately 17% of women are depressed in the postpartum period.2 Perinatal generalized anxiety disorder has been shown to have a prevalence of 8.5%-10.5% during pregnancy with a wider variance post partum.3 Approximately 3% of women in the general community develop PTSD symptoms following childbirth.4 Research suggests that about 2% of women develop obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms in the postpartum period.5 Postpartum psychosis, a rare but potentially devastating illness, occurs after 0.1%-0.2% of births.6
Importance of maternal mental health
There is a growing body of literature supporting both obstetric and pediatric adverse outcomes related to untreated psychiatric illness. Untreated maternal depression has been associated with obstetric complications, such as preterm delivery, preeclampsia, low birth weight, as well as the child’s developing cognitive function.7 Anxiety during pregnancy has been associated with both a shorter gestational period and adverse implications for fetal neurodevelopment.
These adverse effects were found to be even more potent in “pregnancy anxiety,” or anxiety specifically focused on the pregnancy, the birth experience, and the transition to motherhood.8 The psychotic symptoms occurring during postpartum psychosis can jeopardize the lives of both a woman and her child and carries a 4% risk of infanticide.9 Although there are limited data about the long-term effects of postpartum obsessive-compulsive disorders and PTSD, it is reasonable to assume that they might carry negative long-term implications for the mother and possibly her child.
Barriers to treatment
Despite the significant rates of mental illness, pregnant and new mothers often face barriers to receiving treatment. Many psychiatrists are hesitant to prescribe psychiatric medication to pregnant women because of concerns about teratogenic potential of psychiatric medications; similar concerns exist for newborn babies when prescribing medications to lactating mothers. In addition, the field of reproductive psychiatry is evolving at a rapid pace, making it difficult for busy psychiatrists to keep up with the ever-growing literature.
Also, it is hard to imagine a population that has more barriers to attending outpatient appointments. For many new mothers, the exhaustion and all-consuming work involved with taking care of a newborn are insurmountable barriers to obtaining mental health care. In addition, despite the awareness that new mothers often are more emotional, families can be slow to recognize the developing severity of a psychiatric illness during the peripartum and postpartum periods.
Supporting and treating new mothers
As general psychiatrists, there are several ways to directly help these women.
1. Expect the expected. Even in women with no prior psychiatric history, a significant percentage of expectant and postpartum women will develop acute psychiatric symptoms. Learn about the different presentations and treatments of perinatal and postpartum psychiatric disorders. For example, a woman might have thoughts of harming her baby in both postpartum psychosis and obsessive-compulsive disorder. However, the acuity and treatment of these two conditions drastically differ.
2. Learn more about psychiatric medications. Several apps and websites are available to psychiatrists to learn about the safety profile of psychiatric medications, such as Reprotox.org, mothertobaby.org, lactmed, and womensmentalhealth.org. Many medications are considered to be relatively safe during pregnancy and breastfeeding. It is important for psychiatrists to appreciate the risks when choosing not to prescribe to pregnant and postpartum women. Sometimes a known risk of a specific medication may be preferable to the unknown risk of leaving a woman susceptible to a severe psychiatric decompensation.
3. Involve all members of the family. A mother’s mental health has significant implications for the entire family. Psychoeducation for the family as well as frequent family sessions are key tools when treating this population. In addition, prescribing to pregnant women provides the opportunity for a psychiatrist to refine skills in joint decision making; it is crucial to involve both a patient and her spouse when discussing psychiatric medications.
4. Provide ready access and collaborate care. It is important to understand the potential rapid onset of psychiatric symptoms during the pregnancy and postpartum period. Psychiatrists should be prepared to collaborate care with other specialties. It is important to establish relationships with community psychotherapists specializing in maternal mental health, pediatricians, as well as obstetricians.
5. Learn when to seek a higher level of care. Although many women with perinatal and postpartum psychiatric symptoms can be managed as outpatients, women at times need a higher level of care. Similar to general psychiatry, women who are acutely suicidal or homicidal or have a sudden onset of psychotic and manic symptoms all should be evaluated immediately for inpatient hospitalization. Women with less severe symptoms but who require a higher level of care than typically offered in standard outpatient treatment should be candidates for partial hospitalization programs.
General intensive programs usually can accommodate these women, but it is ideal to refer this population to perinatal intensive programs. Postpartum Support International (postpartum.net) lists the nationwide inpatient and partial perinatal programs as well as regional and local services. An example of inpatient perinatal care is the women’s unit at Zucker Hillside Hospital (Northwell Health System, Glen Oaks, N.Y.), which houses an inpatient perinatal program. As a psychiatrist on the unit, I treat acute symptoms such as depression, anxiety, psychosis, mania, and catatonia that occur during the perinatal and postpartum periods. Given the severity of symptoms, I use a wide range of psychiatric medications with the possibility of electroconvulsive therapy when indicated. Psychotherapy staff on the unit offer specialized perinatal, mothers, and dialectical behavioral therapy groups. Breast pumps are available for women who wish to breastfeed. Accommodations are made for babies and children to visit their mother when clinically appropriate. Once discharged, women often are referred to Zucker Hillside’s own perinatal outpatient clinic for continued treatment. Similar models exist in select inpatient units as well as an increasing number of partial programs across the United States.
Conclusion
Psychiatric care for pregnant and new mothers can be challenging, but it is also immensely rewarding. Restoring a mother’s mental health usually leads to increased emotional stability for her entire family. Given the prevalence of maternal mental health disorders, psychiatrists in nearly every setting will encounter this population of women. With dedicated time devoted to reviewing the literature and learning about local resources, psychiatrists can feel comfortable treating women throughout the childbearing experience.
References
1. J Affect Disord. 2017 Sep;219:86-92.
2. J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Sep;104:235-48.
3. J Womens Health. (Larchmt). 2015 Sep;24(9):762-70.
4. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Jul;34(5):389-401.
5. Compr Psychiatry. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):503-9.
6. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;15(3):231-42.
7. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;61(3):533-43.
8. Curr Opinion Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;25(2):141-8.
9. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;166(4):405-8.
Dr. Reinstein is a psychiatry attending at Zucker Hillside Hospital. Her clinical interests include reproductive psychiatry and family therapy, with a specific focus on maternal mental health. Dr. Reinstein completed her adult psychiatry residency training at Montefiore Hospital/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, after graduating from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Yeshiva University, New York, with a BA in biology. She is one of the recipients of the 4th Annual Resident Recognition Award for Excellence in Family Oriented Care.
Firing patients
After last month’s
One might assume that, just as patients are free to choose or reject their doctors, physicians have an equal right to reject their patients; and to a certain extent, that’s true. There are no specific laws prohibiting a provider from terminating a patient relationship for any reason, other than a discriminatory one – race, nationality, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, and so on. However, our ethical obligations to “do no harm” and to place our patients’ welfare above our own self-interests dictate that dismissing a patient should be the absolute last resort, after all other options have been exhausted.
First, to avoid charges of arbitrary termination, you should draw up a specific list of situations that could merit a dismissal from your office, and add it to your office manual. Every list will probably differ in some respects, but for the sake of example, here is mine:
- Threats or violence toward physicians or staff.
- Inappropriate sexual advances toward physicians or staff.
- Providing false or misleading medical history.
- Repeated rude or disruptive behavior.
- Demands for unapproved, unindicated, or inappropriate treatments or medications (particularly controlled substances).
- Refusal to adhere to agreed-upon treatment plans.
- Repeated failure to keep scheduled appointments.
- Repeated failure to pay medical bills.
As with pretty much everything in a private practice, accurate and written documentation of dismissible behavior is essential. Record all incidents and assemble as much material evidence as possible from all available sources.
In most cases (except the first two infractions on our list, for which we have zero tolerance), we make every effort to resolve the problem amicably. We communicate with the patients in question, explain our concerns, and discuss options for resolution. I also may send a letter, repeating my concerns and proposed solutions, as further documentation of our efforts to achieve an amicable resolution. All verbal and written warnings are, of course, documented as well. If the patient has a managed care policy, we review the managed care contract, which sometimes includes specific requirements for dismissal of its patients.
When such efforts fail, we send the patient two letters – one certified with return receipt, the other by conventional first class, in case the patient refuses the certified copy – explaining the reason for dismissal, and that care will be discontinued in 30 days from the letter’s date. (Most attorneys and medical associations agree that 30 days is sufficient reasonable notice.) We offer to provide care during the interim period, include a list of names and contact information for potential alternate providers, and offer to transfer records after receiving written permission.
Following these precautions will usually protect you from charges of “patient abandonment,” which is generally defined as the unilateral severance by the physician of the physician-patient relationship without giving the patient sufficient advance notice to obtain the services of another practitioner, and at a time when the patient still requires medical attention.
Some states have their own unique definitions of patient abandonment. You should check with your state’s health department, and your attorney, for any unusual requirements in your state, because violating these could lead to intervention by your state licensing board. There also is the risk of civil litigation, which typically is not covered by malpractice policies and may not be covered by your general liability policy either.
Patients who feel that termination was unjustified also may respond with negative reviews on social media, which I’ve discussed in recent columns, and will again, soon.
If something untrue is posted about you on a doctor-rating site, take action. Reputable sites have their own reputations to protect and can usually be persuaded to remove anything that is demonstrably false, although you may need a lawyer’s letter to get their attention. Try to get the error removed entirely or corrected within the original posting. An erratum on some distant page of the website is likely to be ignored, and will leave the false information online, intact.
Unfair comments are unlikely to be removed unless they are blatantly libelous; but many sites allow you to post a response, giving your side of the story. (More on that in the near future.) Also, there is nothing wrong with encouraging happy patients to write favorable reviews on those same sites. Sauce for the goose, and all that.
Dr. Eastern practices dermatology and dermatologic surgery in Belleville, N.J. He is the author of numerous articles and textbook chapters, and is a longtime monthly columnist for Dermatology News. Write to him at [email protected].
After last month’s
One might assume that, just as patients are free to choose or reject their doctors, physicians have an equal right to reject their patients; and to a certain extent, that’s true. There are no specific laws prohibiting a provider from terminating a patient relationship for any reason, other than a discriminatory one – race, nationality, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, and so on. However, our ethical obligations to “do no harm” and to place our patients’ welfare above our own self-interests dictate that dismissing a patient should be the absolute last resort, after all other options have been exhausted.
First, to avoid charges of arbitrary termination, you should draw up a specific list of situations that could merit a dismissal from your office, and add it to your office manual. Every list will probably differ in some respects, but for the sake of example, here is mine:
- Threats or violence toward physicians or staff.
- Inappropriate sexual advances toward physicians or staff.
- Providing false or misleading medical history.
- Repeated rude or disruptive behavior.
- Demands for unapproved, unindicated, or inappropriate treatments or medications (particularly controlled substances).
- Refusal to adhere to agreed-upon treatment plans.
- Repeated failure to keep scheduled appointments.
- Repeated failure to pay medical bills.
As with pretty much everything in a private practice, accurate and written documentation of dismissible behavior is essential. Record all incidents and assemble as much material evidence as possible from all available sources.
In most cases (except the first two infractions on our list, for which we have zero tolerance), we make every effort to resolve the problem amicably. We communicate with the patients in question, explain our concerns, and discuss options for resolution. I also may send a letter, repeating my concerns and proposed solutions, as further documentation of our efforts to achieve an amicable resolution. All verbal and written warnings are, of course, documented as well. If the patient has a managed care policy, we review the managed care contract, which sometimes includes specific requirements for dismissal of its patients.
When such efforts fail, we send the patient two letters – one certified with return receipt, the other by conventional first class, in case the patient refuses the certified copy – explaining the reason for dismissal, and that care will be discontinued in 30 days from the letter’s date. (Most attorneys and medical associations agree that 30 days is sufficient reasonable notice.) We offer to provide care during the interim period, include a list of names and contact information for potential alternate providers, and offer to transfer records after receiving written permission.
Following these precautions will usually protect you from charges of “patient abandonment,” which is generally defined as the unilateral severance by the physician of the physician-patient relationship without giving the patient sufficient advance notice to obtain the services of another practitioner, and at a time when the patient still requires medical attention.
Some states have their own unique definitions of patient abandonment. You should check with your state’s health department, and your attorney, for any unusual requirements in your state, because violating these could lead to intervention by your state licensing board. There also is the risk of civil litigation, which typically is not covered by malpractice policies and may not be covered by your general liability policy either.
Patients who feel that termination was unjustified also may respond with negative reviews on social media, which I’ve discussed in recent columns, and will again, soon.
If something untrue is posted about you on a doctor-rating site, take action. Reputable sites have their own reputations to protect and can usually be persuaded to remove anything that is demonstrably false, although you may need a lawyer’s letter to get their attention. Try to get the error removed entirely or corrected within the original posting. An erratum on some distant page of the website is likely to be ignored, and will leave the false information online, intact.
Unfair comments are unlikely to be removed unless they are blatantly libelous; but many sites allow you to post a response, giving your side of the story. (More on that in the near future.) Also, there is nothing wrong with encouraging happy patients to write favorable reviews on those same sites. Sauce for the goose, and all that.
Dr. Eastern practices dermatology and dermatologic surgery in Belleville, N.J. He is the author of numerous articles and textbook chapters, and is a longtime monthly columnist for Dermatology News. Write to him at [email protected].
After last month’s
One might assume that, just as patients are free to choose or reject their doctors, physicians have an equal right to reject their patients; and to a certain extent, that’s true. There are no specific laws prohibiting a provider from terminating a patient relationship for any reason, other than a discriminatory one – race, nationality, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, and so on. However, our ethical obligations to “do no harm” and to place our patients’ welfare above our own self-interests dictate that dismissing a patient should be the absolute last resort, after all other options have been exhausted.
First, to avoid charges of arbitrary termination, you should draw up a specific list of situations that could merit a dismissal from your office, and add it to your office manual. Every list will probably differ in some respects, but for the sake of example, here is mine:
- Threats or violence toward physicians or staff.
- Inappropriate sexual advances toward physicians or staff.
- Providing false or misleading medical history.
- Repeated rude or disruptive behavior.
- Demands for unapproved, unindicated, or inappropriate treatments or medications (particularly controlled substances).
- Refusal to adhere to agreed-upon treatment plans.
- Repeated failure to keep scheduled appointments.
- Repeated failure to pay medical bills.
As with pretty much everything in a private practice, accurate and written documentation of dismissible behavior is essential. Record all incidents and assemble as much material evidence as possible from all available sources.
In most cases (except the first two infractions on our list, for which we have zero tolerance), we make every effort to resolve the problem amicably. We communicate with the patients in question, explain our concerns, and discuss options for resolution. I also may send a letter, repeating my concerns and proposed solutions, as further documentation of our efforts to achieve an amicable resolution. All verbal and written warnings are, of course, documented as well. If the patient has a managed care policy, we review the managed care contract, which sometimes includes specific requirements for dismissal of its patients.
When such efforts fail, we send the patient two letters – one certified with return receipt, the other by conventional first class, in case the patient refuses the certified copy – explaining the reason for dismissal, and that care will be discontinued in 30 days from the letter’s date. (Most attorneys and medical associations agree that 30 days is sufficient reasonable notice.) We offer to provide care during the interim period, include a list of names and contact information for potential alternate providers, and offer to transfer records after receiving written permission.
Following these precautions will usually protect you from charges of “patient abandonment,” which is generally defined as the unilateral severance by the physician of the physician-patient relationship without giving the patient sufficient advance notice to obtain the services of another practitioner, and at a time when the patient still requires medical attention.
Some states have their own unique definitions of patient abandonment. You should check with your state’s health department, and your attorney, for any unusual requirements in your state, because violating these could lead to intervention by your state licensing board. There also is the risk of civil litigation, which typically is not covered by malpractice policies and may not be covered by your general liability policy either.
Patients who feel that termination was unjustified also may respond with negative reviews on social media, which I’ve discussed in recent columns, and will again, soon.
If something untrue is posted about you on a doctor-rating site, take action. Reputable sites have their own reputations to protect and can usually be persuaded to remove anything that is demonstrably false, although you may need a lawyer’s letter to get their attention. Try to get the error removed entirely or corrected within the original posting. An erratum on some distant page of the website is likely to be ignored, and will leave the false information online, intact.
Unfair comments are unlikely to be removed unless they are blatantly libelous; but many sites allow you to post a response, giving your side of the story. (More on that in the near future.) Also, there is nothing wrong with encouraging happy patients to write favorable reviews on those same sites. Sauce for the goose, and all that.
Dr. Eastern practices dermatology and dermatologic surgery in Belleville, N.J. He is the author of numerous articles and textbook chapters, and is a longtime monthly columnist for Dermatology News. Write to him at [email protected].
Hypoglycemia in the elderly: Watch for atypical symptoms
We read with interest the review article by Keber and Fiebert, “Diabetes in the elderly: Matching meds to needs” (J Fam Pract. 2018;67:408-410,412-415). The authors have provided a timely overview of antidiabetes medications for elderly people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and their relative risks for hypoglycemia.
We’d like to add to this important conversation.
Aging, per se, modifies the glycemic thresholds for autonomic symptoms and cognitive impairment; in older nondiabetic men (mean + SD: age 65 ± 3 years), autonomic symptoms and cognitive dysfunction commence at identical glycemic thresholds (3 ± 0.2 mmol/L [54 ± 4 mg/dL]). By contrast, in younger men (age 23 ± 2 years), a significant gap is observed between the glycemic threshold for symptom generation (3.6 mmol/L [65 mg/dL]) and the onset of cognitive dysfunction (2.6 mmol/L [47 mg/dL]).1,2 The simultaneous occurrence of symptoms and cognitive impairment in older people may adversely affect their ability to recognize and treat hypoglycemia promptly.
In addition, hypoglycemia in older T2DM patients often presents with atypical neurologic symptoms, including incoordination and ataxia, slurring of speech, and visual disturbances, which either are not identified as hypoglycemia or are misdiagnosed as other medical disorders (eg, transient ischemic attack).3 Knowledge about hypoglycemia symptoms is poor, in both elderly people with diabetes and their relatives and caregivers, which compromises the ability to identify hypoglycemia and provide effective treatment.4 Education about the possible presentations of hypoglycemia and its effective treatment is essential for older patients and their relatives.
Jan Brož, MD
Prague, Czech Republic
1. Meneilly GS, Elahi D. Physiological importance of first-phase insulin release in elderly patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1326-1329.
2. Matyka K, Evans M, Lomas J, et al. Altered hierarchy of protective responses against severe hypoglycemia in normal aging in healthy men. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:135-141.
3. Jaap AJ, Jones GC, McCrimmon RJ, et al. Perceived symptoms of hypoglycaemia in elderly type 2 diabetic patients treated with insulin. Diabet Med. 1998;15:398-401.
4. Thomson FJ, Masson EA, Leeming JT, et al. Lack of knowledge of symptoms of hypoglycaemia by elderly diabetic patients. Age Ageing. 1991;20:404-406.
We read with interest the review article by Keber and Fiebert, “Diabetes in the elderly: Matching meds to needs” (J Fam Pract. 2018;67:408-410,412-415). The authors have provided a timely overview of antidiabetes medications for elderly people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and their relative risks for hypoglycemia.
We’d like to add to this important conversation.
Aging, per se, modifies the glycemic thresholds for autonomic symptoms and cognitive impairment; in older nondiabetic men (mean + SD: age 65 ± 3 years), autonomic symptoms and cognitive dysfunction commence at identical glycemic thresholds (3 ± 0.2 mmol/L [54 ± 4 mg/dL]). By contrast, in younger men (age 23 ± 2 years), a significant gap is observed between the glycemic threshold for symptom generation (3.6 mmol/L [65 mg/dL]) and the onset of cognitive dysfunction (2.6 mmol/L [47 mg/dL]).1,2 The simultaneous occurrence of symptoms and cognitive impairment in older people may adversely affect their ability to recognize and treat hypoglycemia promptly.
In addition, hypoglycemia in older T2DM patients often presents with atypical neurologic symptoms, including incoordination and ataxia, slurring of speech, and visual disturbances, which either are not identified as hypoglycemia or are misdiagnosed as other medical disorders (eg, transient ischemic attack).3 Knowledge about hypoglycemia symptoms is poor, in both elderly people with diabetes and their relatives and caregivers, which compromises the ability to identify hypoglycemia and provide effective treatment.4 Education about the possible presentations of hypoglycemia and its effective treatment is essential for older patients and their relatives.
Jan Brož, MD
Prague, Czech Republic
We read with interest the review article by Keber and Fiebert, “Diabetes in the elderly: Matching meds to needs” (J Fam Pract. 2018;67:408-410,412-415). The authors have provided a timely overview of antidiabetes medications for elderly people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and their relative risks for hypoglycemia.
We’d like to add to this important conversation.
Aging, per se, modifies the glycemic thresholds for autonomic symptoms and cognitive impairment; in older nondiabetic men (mean + SD: age 65 ± 3 years), autonomic symptoms and cognitive dysfunction commence at identical glycemic thresholds (3 ± 0.2 mmol/L [54 ± 4 mg/dL]). By contrast, in younger men (age 23 ± 2 years), a significant gap is observed between the glycemic threshold for symptom generation (3.6 mmol/L [65 mg/dL]) and the onset of cognitive dysfunction (2.6 mmol/L [47 mg/dL]).1,2 The simultaneous occurrence of symptoms and cognitive impairment in older people may adversely affect their ability to recognize and treat hypoglycemia promptly.
In addition, hypoglycemia in older T2DM patients often presents with atypical neurologic symptoms, including incoordination and ataxia, slurring of speech, and visual disturbances, which either are not identified as hypoglycemia or are misdiagnosed as other medical disorders (eg, transient ischemic attack).3 Knowledge about hypoglycemia symptoms is poor, in both elderly people with diabetes and their relatives and caregivers, which compromises the ability to identify hypoglycemia and provide effective treatment.4 Education about the possible presentations of hypoglycemia and its effective treatment is essential for older patients and their relatives.
Jan Brož, MD
Prague, Czech Republic
1. Meneilly GS, Elahi D. Physiological importance of first-phase insulin release in elderly patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1326-1329.
2. Matyka K, Evans M, Lomas J, et al. Altered hierarchy of protective responses against severe hypoglycemia in normal aging in healthy men. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:135-141.
3. Jaap AJ, Jones GC, McCrimmon RJ, et al. Perceived symptoms of hypoglycaemia in elderly type 2 diabetic patients treated with insulin. Diabet Med. 1998;15:398-401.
4. Thomson FJ, Masson EA, Leeming JT, et al. Lack of knowledge of symptoms of hypoglycaemia by elderly diabetic patients. Age Ageing. 1991;20:404-406.
1. Meneilly GS, Elahi D. Physiological importance of first-phase insulin release in elderly patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1326-1329.
2. Matyka K, Evans M, Lomas J, et al. Altered hierarchy of protective responses against severe hypoglycemia in normal aging in healthy men. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:135-141.
3. Jaap AJ, Jones GC, McCrimmon RJ, et al. Perceived symptoms of hypoglycaemia in elderly type 2 diabetic patients treated with insulin. Diabet Med. 1998;15:398-401.
4. Thomson FJ, Masson EA, Leeming JT, et al. Lack of knowledge of symptoms of hypoglycaemia by elderly diabetic patients. Age Ageing. 1991;20:404-406.
Another practice’s experiences in “dialing back opioids”
It is with much enthusiasm that we read the article “Dialing back opioids for chronic pain one conversation at a time” (J Fam Pract. 2018;67:753-757) about the author’s approach to opioid tapering. We have implemented a similar process in our own medical home practice, based on the continuity relationship and the Ecological Systems Theory.
The use of the human resources within the medical home—care coordinator, pharmacist, community health worker, etc— distributes the responsibility and lessens the burden of care for the family physician. The Ecological Systems Theory provides a structure for understanding the interaction between proximal influencers (eg, the team) and more distal influences (eg, national guidelines and institutional mandates).
Recently, we presented our findings at the 2018 North American Primary Care Research Group (NAPCRG) Annual Meeting. Our results showed a 50% decline in per capita medication use over an almost 14-month period.
We feel that opioid tapering provides both a counterpoint and a complementary method to medication-assisted therapies (MAT). A counterpoint, because MAT involves the diagnosis and treatment of opioid misuse disorder. At the core of that diagnosis is the question of whether all chronic opioid use should be labelled as “misuse.” Tapering involves no such diagnosis and focuses on the safety of minimal opioid use, which, when MAT is used appropriately, is also a primary concern.
We appreciate the approach that the authors took in their project and look forward to seeing further iterations.
Bharat Gopal, MD
Cristina Capannolo, DO
Corvallis, Ore
It is with much enthusiasm that we read the article “Dialing back opioids for chronic pain one conversation at a time” (J Fam Pract. 2018;67:753-757) about the author’s approach to opioid tapering. We have implemented a similar process in our own medical home practice, based on the continuity relationship and the Ecological Systems Theory.
The use of the human resources within the medical home—care coordinator, pharmacist, community health worker, etc— distributes the responsibility and lessens the burden of care for the family physician. The Ecological Systems Theory provides a structure for understanding the interaction between proximal influencers (eg, the team) and more distal influences (eg, national guidelines and institutional mandates).
Recently, we presented our findings at the 2018 North American Primary Care Research Group (NAPCRG) Annual Meeting. Our results showed a 50% decline in per capita medication use over an almost 14-month period.
We feel that opioid tapering provides both a counterpoint and a complementary method to medication-assisted therapies (MAT). A counterpoint, because MAT involves the diagnosis and treatment of opioid misuse disorder. At the core of that diagnosis is the question of whether all chronic opioid use should be labelled as “misuse.” Tapering involves no such diagnosis and focuses on the safety of minimal opioid use, which, when MAT is used appropriately, is also a primary concern.
We appreciate the approach that the authors took in their project and look forward to seeing further iterations.
Bharat Gopal, MD
Cristina Capannolo, DO
Corvallis, Ore
It is with much enthusiasm that we read the article “Dialing back opioids for chronic pain one conversation at a time” (J Fam Pract. 2018;67:753-757) about the author’s approach to opioid tapering. We have implemented a similar process in our own medical home practice, based on the continuity relationship and the Ecological Systems Theory.
The use of the human resources within the medical home—care coordinator, pharmacist, community health worker, etc— distributes the responsibility and lessens the burden of care for the family physician. The Ecological Systems Theory provides a structure for understanding the interaction between proximal influencers (eg, the team) and more distal influences (eg, national guidelines and institutional mandates).
Recently, we presented our findings at the 2018 North American Primary Care Research Group (NAPCRG) Annual Meeting. Our results showed a 50% decline in per capita medication use over an almost 14-month period.
We feel that opioid tapering provides both a counterpoint and a complementary method to medication-assisted therapies (MAT). A counterpoint, because MAT involves the diagnosis and treatment of opioid misuse disorder. At the core of that diagnosis is the question of whether all chronic opioid use should be labelled as “misuse.” Tapering involves no such diagnosis and focuses on the safety of minimal opioid use, which, when MAT is used appropriately, is also a primary concern.
We appreciate the approach that the authors took in their project and look forward to seeing further iterations.
Bharat Gopal, MD
Cristina Capannolo, DO
Corvallis, Ore
Should we upend health care? Yes! (But how?)
In his guest editorial, “Upending this country’s approach to health care” (J Fam Pract. 2018;67:744-745), T. R. Reid makes a number of good points. However, I disagree with his opinion that “This disgraceful state of affairs is not the fault of the nation’s physicians. Rather, the problems with health care in the United States stem from the system that American providers have to work in.”
Through our choices, we have helped create this current system. I started as a family practice attending physician in 1994 and worked in 2 community hospitals. One of these hospitals closed its doors in 2012 and the other merged with a large health care system in 2015. During my 25 years of practice, I watched all of my outstanding primary care colleagues (family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics; 25 to 30 in total) stop their practice of combined outpatient and inpatient work. I currently do not see any primary care physicians (who do outpatient work) during my hospital patient care. Yes, it’s lonely.
I believe this significant change in practice across the United States has led to unintended consequences. First, the administrative burdens (and likely costs) for hospitals and health care systems have risen. Newborn, pediatric, and adult hospitalist services had to be built or bolstered, and then maintained, and the growing number of employed physicians had to be managed. Second, primary care’s attractiveness to some medical students has declined. Should students want a practice where they will likely never take care of their patients in the office and the hospital?
I agree we have a “disgraceful state of affairs,” and we need to work together for the tough solutions. However, as health care leaders, we must take responsibility for our roles in creating the current system. We must acknowledge these roles and learn from them.
Chris Noah, MD
Middleville, Mich
As a longtime family medicine practitioner, I can’t agree more with Mr. Reid’s assessments of the state of our health care system. I have experienced health care from my practice as part of an HMO in Wisconsin, and in a hospital system in Raleigh, NC. Our “system” has done such a poor job of allocating its resources and has sacrificed so much to generate profit for the insurance and pharmaceutical corporations. The question is: How do we develop the political will to overcome these deep pockets to change the system? Victor Fuch’s article in the November issue of JAMA makes a very compelling case for a national health plan.1
Jeff Keil, MD
Cary, NC
1. Fuchs VR. How to make US health care more equitable and less costly: begin by replacing employment-based insurance. JAMA. 2018;320:2071-2072.
In his guest editorial, “Upending this country’s approach to health care” (J Fam Pract. 2018;67:744-745), T. R. Reid makes a number of good points. However, I disagree with his opinion that “This disgraceful state of affairs is not the fault of the nation’s physicians. Rather, the problems with health care in the United States stem from the system that American providers have to work in.”
Through our choices, we have helped create this current system. I started as a family practice attending physician in 1994 and worked in 2 community hospitals. One of these hospitals closed its doors in 2012 and the other merged with a large health care system in 2015. During my 25 years of practice, I watched all of my outstanding primary care colleagues (family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics; 25 to 30 in total) stop their practice of combined outpatient and inpatient work. I currently do not see any primary care physicians (who do outpatient work) during my hospital patient care. Yes, it’s lonely.
I believe this significant change in practice across the United States has led to unintended consequences. First, the administrative burdens (and likely costs) for hospitals and health care systems have risen. Newborn, pediatric, and adult hospitalist services had to be built or bolstered, and then maintained, and the growing number of employed physicians had to be managed. Second, primary care’s attractiveness to some medical students has declined. Should students want a practice where they will likely never take care of their patients in the office and the hospital?
I agree we have a “disgraceful state of affairs,” and we need to work together for the tough solutions. However, as health care leaders, we must take responsibility for our roles in creating the current system. We must acknowledge these roles and learn from them.
Chris Noah, MD
Middleville, Mich
As a longtime family medicine practitioner, I can’t agree more with Mr. Reid’s assessments of the state of our health care system. I have experienced health care from my practice as part of an HMO in Wisconsin, and in a hospital system in Raleigh, NC. Our “system” has done such a poor job of allocating its resources and has sacrificed so much to generate profit for the insurance and pharmaceutical corporations. The question is: How do we develop the political will to overcome these deep pockets to change the system? Victor Fuch’s article in the November issue of JAMA makes a very compelling case for a national health plan.1
Jeff Keil, MD
Cary, NC
In his guest editorial, “Upending this country’s approach to health care” (J Fam Pract. 2018;67:744-745), T. R. Reid makes a number of good points. However, I disagree with his opinion that “This disgraceful state of affairs is not the fault of the nation’s physicians. Rather, the problems with health care in the United States stem from the system that American providers have to work in.”
Through our choices, we have helped create this current system. I started as a family practice attending physician in 1994 and worked in 2 community hospitals. One of these hospitals closed its doors in 2012 and the other merged with a large health care system in 2015. During my 25 years of practice, I watched all of my outstanding primary care colleagues (family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics; 25 to 30 in total) stop their practice of combined outpatient and inpatient work. I currently do not see any primary care physicians (who do outpatient work) during my hospital patient care. Yes, it’s lonely.
I believe this significant change in practice across the United States has led to unintended consequences. First, the administrative burdens (and likely costs) for hospitals and health care systems have risen. Newborn, pediatric, and adult hospitalist services had to be built or bolstered, and then maintained, and the growing number of employed physicians had to be managed. Second, primary care’s attractiveness to some medical students has declined. Should students want a practice where they will likely never take care of their patients in the office and the hospital?
I agree we have a “disgraceful state of affairs,” and we need to work together for the tough solutions. However, as health care leaders, we must take responsibility for our roles in creating the current system. We must acknowledge these roles and learn from them.
Chris Noah, MD
Middleville, Mich
As a longtime family medicine practitioner, I can’t agree more with Mr. Reid’s assessments of the state of our health care system. I have experienced health care from my practice as part of an HMO in Wisconsin, and in a hospital system in Raleigh, NC. Our “system” has done such a poor job of allocating its resources and has sacrificed so much to generate profit for the insurance and pharmaceutical corporations. The question is: How do we develop the political will to overcome these deep pockets to change the system? Victor Fuch’s article in the November issue of JAMA makes a very compelling case for a national health plan.1
Jeff Keil, MD
Cary, NC
1. Fuchs VR. How to make US health care more equitable and less costly: begin by replacing employment-based insurance. JAMA. 2018;320:2071-2072.
1. Fuchs VR. How to make US health care more equitable and less costly: begin by replacing employment-based insurance. JAMA. 2018;320:2071-2072.
An update on treatment of depression
Paul is 13-year-old male in seventh grade with a history of inattentive ADHD and a positive family history of depression and anxiety in his mother. He always has had a few friends, but recently they have not wanted to hang out with him; he feels like people are ignoring him. For the past 2 months, Paul’s mood has gotten very low. He feels sad and also bored because he is not enjoying anything anymore. He feels as though he is “a loser,” and as though nothing will ever get better. His grades have dropped. He has thoughts of wishing he were dead, although he has no specific plan and says he wouldn’t do it because he doesn’t want to hurt his parents. He is looking at his phone at night and gets to bed late, then doesn’t want to get up in the morning. He sleeps until noon on weekends. Appetite is increased. He doesn’t have energy to do things on the weekends.
Discussion
Paul clearly meets diagnostic criteria for depression. He feels sad and has lost pleasure in activities he used to enjoy. He has negative, hopeless thoughts, and vague thoughts of death although no specific plans. He has vegetative signs of depression with increased appetite and sleep; he likely has worse concentration than usual, given that his grades have dropped. Energy is low.
Meta-analyses have demonstrated the efficacy of SSRIs (fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram) as well as venlafaxine, mirtazapine, and nefazodone with small to very small effect sizes.1 A large placebo effect is seen in many of these studies, correlating with the number of study sites – a feature of many industry-sponsored studies.
John Walkup, MD, a leading researcher on both medication and psychotherapeutic interventions in children’s mood disorders, has pointed out that the quality of industry-sponsored studies (vs. National Institute of Mental Health–sponsored studies) is likely lower, with more pressure to get in large numbers of patients in a short period of time, less trained investigators leading to less clear-cut diagnoses, and other sources of bias.2 This raises the question of whether we should weight NIMH-sponsored studies more heavily in meta-analyses.
A second factor to consider is the risk of harm, and a significant issue here is the question of whether suicidal ideation is increased among those patients taking SSRIs. Meta-analyses from the late 2000s, which balanced the number needed to treat vs. the number needed to harm, judged that for children under age 13 years, fluoxetine was the only antidepressant that was worth the cost-benefit ratio. However, in the past several years there has been a major improvement in the assessment of suicidal ideation in the form of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, a standardized method of assessing the presence and significance of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Studies that have used this assessment have found no significant increase in suicidal ideation with SSRIs vs. placebo.
The takeaway here is that the SSRIs can work, with fluoxetine, sertraline, and escitalopram leading the evidence, and that with refinements of the assessment they do not appear to increase the risk of suicidal ideation.3 Of course, it remains important to discuss this issue with families.
Psychotherapy is the other major treatment for depression. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and Interpersonal therapy (IPT) for adolescents show effectiveness in teens.4 Recent meta-analyses have gotten stronger through the use of stringent quality criteria and the inclusion of negative studies; these therapies continue to be considered well established. It is worthwhile to talk to therapists in your community to understand what type of treatment they offer. If you are hiring therapists to be embedded in your practice, look for people who have been trained in CBT or IPT. It is particularly helpful to know whether therapists have seen patients using CBT or IPT while getting supervision in these modalities.
CBT and IPT are different. CBT puts an emphasis on the thought-feeling-behavior triangle while IPT focuses more on relationships. Someone who has tried one and has not benefited nevertheless may benefit from the other.
Working with your patients to choose what type of psychotherapy modality for depression they would like is particularly effective.
Finally, be aware of how the environment may be affecting your patient. School issues related to peers, learning style or disabilities, and organization have a major effect on teens. In this case, Paul is looking at his phone nightly, which may be affecting both his sleep and self-esteem. Family issues continue to play a key role.
Paul was referred for CBT therapy, which was moderately helpful. After a few months, sertraline was added with further improvement. A key element in fully resolving Paul’s depression was his becoming involved in the drama club, which gave him the chance to meet a group of peers who shared his interests.
Dr. Hall is assistant professor of psychiatry and pediatrics at the University of Vermont, Burlington. She said she had no relevant financial disclosures. Email her at [email protected].
References
1. JAMA. 2007 Apr 18;297(15):1683-96.
2. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;174(5):430-7.
3. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2018. doi: 10.1089/cap.2017.0174.
4. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2017 Jan-Feb;46(1):11-43.
Paul is 13-year-old male in seventh grade with a history of inattentive ADHD and a positive family history of depression and anxiety in his mother. He always has had a few friends, but recently they have not wanted to hang out with him; he feels like people are ignoring him. For the past 2 months, Paul’s mood has gotten very low. He feels sad and also bored because he is not enjoying anything anymore. He feels as though he is “a loser,” and as though nothing will ever get better. His grades have dropped. He has thoughts of wishing he were dead, although he has no specific plan and says he wouldn’t do it because he doesn’t want to hurt his parents. He is looking at his phone at night and gets to bed late, then doesn’t want to get up in the morning. He sleeps until noon on weekends. Appetite is increased. He doesn’t have energy to do things on the weekends.
Discussion
Paul clearly meets diagnostic criteria for depression. He feels sad and has lost pleasure in activities he used to enjoy. He has negative, hopeless thoughts, and vague thoughts of death although no specific plans. He has vegetative signs of depression with increased appetite and sleep; he likely has worse concentration than usual, given that his grades have dropped. Energy is low.
Meta-analyses have demonstrated the efficacy of SSRIs (fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram) as well as venlafaxine, mirtazapine, and nefazodone with small to very small effect sizes.1 A large placebo effect is seen in many of these studies, correlating with the number of study sites – a feature of many industry-sponsored studies.
John Walkup, MD, a leading researcher on both medication and psychotherapeutic interventions in children’s mood disorders, has pointed out that the quality of industry-sponsored studies (vs. National Institute of Mental Health–sponsored studies) is likely lower, with more pressure to get in large numbers of patients in a short period of time, less trained investigators leading to less clear-cut diagnoses, and other sources of bias.2 This raises the question of whether we should weight NIMH-sponsored studies more heavily in meta-analyses.
A second factor to consider is the risk of harm, and a significant issue here is the question of whether suicidal ideation is increased among those patients taking SSRIs. Meta-analyses from the late 2000s, which balanced the number needed to treat vs. the number needed to harm, judged that for children under age 13 years, fluoxetine was the only antidepressant that was worth the cost-benefit ratio. However, in the past several years there has been a major improvement in the assessment of suicidal ideation in the form of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, a standardized method of assessing the presence and significance of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Studies that have used this assessment have found no significant increase in suicidal ideation with SSRIs vs. placebo.
The takeaway here is that the SSRIs can work, with fluoxetine, sertraline, and escitalopram leading the evidence, and that with refinements of the assessment they do not appear to increase the risk of suicidal ideation.3 Of course, it remains important to discuss this issue with families.
Psychotherapy is the other major treatment for depression. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and Interpersonal therapy (IPT) for adolescents show effectiveness in teens.4 Recent meta-analyses have gotten stronger through the use of stringent quality criteria and the inclusion of negative studies; these therapies continue to be considered well established. It is worthwhile to talk to therapists in your community to understand what type of treatment they offer. If you are hiring therapists to be embedded in your practice, look for people who have been trained in CBT or IPT. It is particularly helpful to know whether therapists have seen patients using CBT or IPT while getting supervision in these modalities.
CBT and IPT are different. CBT puts an emphasis on the thought-feeling-behavior triangle while IPT focuses more on relationships. Someone who has tried one and has not benefited nevertheless may benefit from the other.
Working with your patients to choose what type of psychotherapy modality for depression they would like is particularly effective.
Finally, be aware of how the environment may be affecting your patient. School issues related to peers, learning style or disabilities, and organization have a major effect on teens. In this case, Paul is looking at his phone nightly, which may be affecting both his sleep and self-esteem. Family issues continue to play a key role.
Paul was referred for CBT therapy, which was moderately helpful. After a few months, sertraline was added with further improvement. A key element in fully resolving Paul’s depression was his becoming involved in the drama club, which gave him the chance to meet a group of peers who shared his interests.
Dr. Hall is assistant professor of psychiatry and pediatrics at the University of Vermont, Burlington. She said she had no relevant financial disclosures. Email her at [email protected].
References
1. JAMA. 2007 Apr 18;297(15):1683-96.
2. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;174(5):430-7.
3. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2018. doi: 10.1089/cap.2017.0174.
4. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2017 Jan-Feb;46(1):11-43.
Paul is 13-year-old male in seventh grade with a history of inattentive ADHD and a positive family history of depression and anxiety in his mother. He always has had a few friends, but recently they have not wanted to hang out with him; he feels like people are ignoring him. For the past 2 months, Paul’s mood has gotten very low. He feels sad and also bored because he is not enjoying anything anymore. He feels as though he is “a loser,” and as though nothing will ever get better. His grades have dropped. He has thoughts of wishing he were dead, although he has no specific plan and says he wouldn’t do it because he doesn’t want to hurt his parents. He is looking at his phone at night and gets to bed late, then doesn’t want to get up in the morning. He sleeps until noon on weekends. Appetite is increased. He doesn’t have energy to do things on the weekends.
Discussion
Paul clearly meets diagnostic criteria for depression. He feels sad and has lost pleasure in activities he used to enjoy. He has negative, hopeless thoughts, and vague thoughts of death although no specific plans. He has vegetative signs of depression with increased appetite and sleep; he likely has worse concentration than usual, given that his grades have dropped. Energy is low.
Meta-analyses have demonstrated the efficacy of SSRIs (fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram) as well as venlafaxine, mirtazapine, and nefazodone with small to very small effect sizes.1 A large placebo effect is seen in many of these studies, correlating with the number of study sites – a feature of many industry-sponsored studies.
John Walkup, MD, a leading researcher on both medication and psychotherapeutic interventions in children’s mood disorders, has pointed out that the quality of industry-sponsored studies (vs. National Institute of Mental Health–sponsored studies) is likely lower, with more pressure to get in large numbers of patients in a short period of time, less trained investigators leading to less clear-cut diagnoses, and other sources of bias.2 This raises the question of whether we should weight NIMH-sponsored studies more heavily in meta-analyses.
A second factor to consider is the risk of harm, and a significant issue here is the question of whether suicidal ideation is increased among those patients taking SSRIs. Meta-analyses from the late 2000s, which balanced the number needed to treat vs. the number needed to harm, judged that for children under age 13 years, fluoxetine was the only antidepressant that was worth the cost-benefit ratio. However, in the past several years there has been a major improvement in the assessment of suicidal ideation in the form of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, a standardized method of assessing the presence and significance of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Studies that have used this assessment have found no significant increase in suicidal ideation with SSRIs vs. placebo.
The takeaway here is that the SSRIs can work, with fluoxetine, sertraline, and escitalopram leading the evidence, and that with refinements of the assessment they do not appear to increase the risk of suicidal ideation.3 Of course, it remains important to discuss this issue with families.
Psychotherapy is the other major treatment for depression. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and Interpersonal therapy (IPT) for adolescents show effectiveness in teens.4 Recent meta-analyses have gotten stronger through the use of stringent quality criteria and the inclusion of negative studies; these therapies continue to be considered well established. It is worthwhile to talk to therapists in your community to understand what type of treatment they offer. If you are hiring therapists to be embedded in your practice, look for people who have been trained in CBT or IPT. It is particularly helpful to know whether therapists have seen patients using CBT or IPT while getting supervision in these modalities.
CBT and IPT are different. CBT puts an emphasis on the thought-feeling-behavior triangle while IPT focuses more on relationships. Someone who has tried one and has not benefited nevertheless may benefit from the other.
Working with your patients to choose what type of psychotherapy modality for depression they would like is particularly effective.
Finally, be aware of how the environment may be affecting your patient. School issues related to peers, learning style or disabilities, and organization have a major effect on teens. In this case, Paul is looking at his phone nightly, which may be affecting both his sleep and self-esteem. Family issues continue to play a key role.
Paul was referred for CBT therapy, which was moderately helpful. After a few months, sertraline was added with further improvement. A key element in fully resolving Paul’s depression was his becoming involved in the drama club, which gave him the chance to meet a group of peers who shared his interests.
Dr. Hall is assistant professor of psychiatry and pediatrics at the University of Vermont, Burlington. She said she had no relevant financial disclosures. Email her at [email protected].
References
1. JAMA. 2007 Apr 18;297(15):1683-96.
2. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;174(5):430-7.
3. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2018. doi: 10.1089/cap.2017.0174.
4. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2017 Jan-Feb;46(1):11-43.








