Dermatology

When she was 3 years old, a lesion appeared on this child’s face. It was small and caused little to no concern for several years. The child is now 9, and about a year ago, the lesion began to enlarge, ultimately reaching its present size.

First thought to be a pimple, the lesion was later deemed to be “cystic in nature” by another provider. By that point, however, the lesion was quite prominent—to the extent that it intrudes into the patient’s visual field. Perhaps more significantly for someone her age, it has prompted looks and comments that make her uncomfortable.

Fortunately, the lesion causes no pain or physical discomfort, and no other lesions have manifested. The child’s health is generally excellent.

EXAMINATION
A firm nodule, measuring 1.0 by 0.8 cm, is located on the patient’s left upper nasal sidewall. It stands out on an otherwise pristine face free of other blemishes. The lesion is predominantly red, with faint epidermal disturbance in the center. No punctum is appreciated. The lesion is quite firm on palpation, with just a hint of fluctuance but no tenderness or increased warmth.

Excision is clearly indicated; however, the wait for an appointment with a plastic surgeon is currently weeks to months. So an attempt is made to reduce the prominence of the lesion through incision and drainage, which also offers an opportunity to visualize its contents and possibly confirm a diagnosis. The lesion is opened with a #11 blade, and copious amounts of whitish, grainy material is digitally extruded.

What’s the diagnosis?

DISCUSSION
The contents are consistent with those of a somewhat unusual lesion, commonly called pilomatricoma. It is also known as calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe and pilomatrixoma.

This type of cyst is derived from the hair matrix and is commonly seen on the face, neck, scalp, and arms of children and young adults. This patient’s lesion was atypical in its prominence and erythema, at odds with the firm bluish intradermal papule or nodule usually seen in these cases. But the unique contents established the diagnosis with considerable certainty.

All that remained was the excision—which, given the patient’s age and the cosmetic concerns, would require above-average surgical skills. Once removed, the sample will be sent for pathologic examination, which should show anucleate squamous cells (“ghost cells”), benign viable squamous cells with a lining consisting of basaloid cells. Calcifications with foreign body giant cells account for the pathognomic white flecks seen in the extruded material.

Pilomatricoma’s cause is debatable, but it appears to involve increased levels of beta catenin caused by mutations of the APC gene. This effectively inhibits apoptosis, leading to focal increases in cell growth.

The differential for this type of lesion includes simple acne cyst (unlikely in such a young child), carbuncle (which would have been quite painful and full of pus), or even squamous cell carcinoma.

TAKE-HOME LEARNING POINTS

• Pilomatricomas are benign cysts usually seen on the face, neck, scalp, and arms of children and young adults.
• The typical pilomatricoma (sometimes called calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe) is an intradermal papule or nodule, often displaying a faintly bluish color, that is relatively firm on palpation.
• The contents of a pilomatricoma usually consist of whitish curds or flecks of material that represent calcified tissue mixed with foreign body giant cells.
• Pilomatricoma has little or no malignant potential but is often cosmetically significant.

When she was 3 years old, a lesion appeared on this child’s face. It was small and caused little to no concern for several years. The child is now 9, and about a year ago, the lesion began to enlarge, ultimately reaching its present size.

First thought to be a pimple, the lesion was later deemed to be “cystic in nature” by another provider. By that point, however, the lesion was quite prominent—to the extent that it intrudes into the patient’s visual field. Perhaps more significantly for someone her age, it has prompted looks and comments that make her uncomfortable.

Fortunately, the lesion causes no pain or physical discomfort, and no other lesions have manifested. The child’s health is generally excellent.

EXAMINATION
A firm nodule, measuring 1.0 by 0.8 cm, is located on the patient’s left upper nasal sidewall. It stands out on an otherwise pristine face free of other blemishes. The lesion is predominantly red, with faint epidermal disturbance in the center. No punctum is appreciated. The lesion is quite firm on palpation, with just a hint of fluctuance but no tenderness or increased warmth.

Excision is clearly indicated; however, the wait for an appointment with a plastic surgeon is currently weeks to months. So an attempt is made to reduce the prominence of the lesion through incision and drainage, which also offers an opportunity to visualize its contents and possibly confirm a diagnosis. The lesion is opened with a #11 blade, and copious amounts of whitish, grainy material is digitally extruded.

What’s the diagnosis?

DISCUSSION
The contents are consistent with those of a somewhat unusual lesion, commonly called pilomatricoma. It is also known as calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe and pilomatrixoma.

This type of cyst is derived from the hair matrix and is commonly seen on the face, neck, scalp, and arms of children and young adults. This patient’s lesion was atypical in its prominence and erythema, at odds with the firm bluish intradermal papule or nodule usually seen in these cases. But the unique contents established the diagnosis with considerable certainty.

All that remained was the excision—which, given the patient’s age and the cosmetic concerns, would require above-average surgical skills. Once removed, the sample will be sent for pathologic examination, which should show anucleate squamous cells (“ghost cells”), benign viable squamous cells with a lining consisting of basaloid cells. Calcifications with foreign body giant cells account for the pathognomic white flecks seen in the extruded material.

Pilomatricoma’s cause is debatable, but it appears to involve increased levels of beta catenin caused by mutations of the APC gene. This effectively inhibits apoptosis, leading to focal increases in cell growth.

The differential for this type of lesion includes simple acne cyst (unlikely in such a young child), carbuncle (which would have been quite painful and full of pus), or even squamous cell carcinoma.

TAKE-HOME LEARNING POINTS

• Pilomatricomas are benign cysts usually seen on the face, neck, scalp, and arms of children and young adults.
• The typical pilomatricoma (sometimes called calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe) is an intradermal papule or nodule, often displaying a faintly bluish color, that is relatively firm on palpation.
• The contents of a pilomatricoma usually consist of whitish curds or flecks of material that represent calcified tissue mixed with foreign body giant cells.
• Pilomatricoma has little or no malignant potential but is often cosmetically significant.

When she was 3 years old, a lesion appeared on this child’s face. It was small and caused little to no concern for several years. The child is now 9, and about a year ago, the lesion began to enlarge, ultimately reaching its present size.

First thought to be a pimple, the lesion was later deemed to be “cystic in nature” by another provider. By that point, however, the lesion was quite prominent—to the extent that it intrudes into the patient’s visual field. Perhaps more significantly for someone her age, it has prompted looks and comments that make her uncomfortable.

Fortunately, the lesion causes no pain or physical discomfort, and no other lesions have manifested. The child’s health is generally excellent.

EXAMINATION
A firm nodule, measuring 1.0 by 0.8 cm, is located on the patient’s left upper nasal sidewall. It stands out on an otherwise pristine face free of other blemishes. The lesion is predominantly red, with faint epidermal disturbance in the center. No punctum is appreciated. The lesion is quite firm on palpation, with just a hint of fluctuance but no tenderness or increased warmth.

Excision is clearly indicated; however, the wait for an appointment with a plastic surgeon is currently weeks to months. So an attempt is made to reduce the prominence of the lesion through incision and drainage, which also offers an opportunity to visualize its contents and possibly confirm a diagnosis. The lesion is opened with a #11 blade, and copious amounts of whitish, grainy material is digitally extruded.

What’s the diagnosis?

DISCUSSION
The contents are consistent with those of a somewhat unusual lesion, commonly called pilomatricoma. It is also known as calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe and pilomatrixoma.

This type of cyst is derived from the hair matrix and is commonly seen on the face, neck, scalp, and arms of children and young adults. This patient’s lesion was atypical in its prominence and erythema, at odds with the firm bluish intradermal papule or nodule usually seen in these cases. But the unique contents established the diagnosis with considerable certainty.

All that remained was the excision—which, given the patient’s age and the cosmetic concerns, would require above-average surgical skills. Once removed, the sample will be sent for pathologic examination, which should show anucleate squamous cells (“ghost cells”), benign viable squamous cells with a lining consisting of basaloid cells. Calcifications with foreign body giant cells account for the pathognomic white flecks seen in the extruded material.

Pilomatricoma’s cause is debatable, but it appears to involve increased levels of beta catenin caused by mutations of the APC gene. This effectively inhibits apoptosis, leading to focal increases in cell growth.

The differential for this type of lesion includes simple acne cyst (unlikely in such a young child), carbuncle (which would have been quite painful and full of pus), or even squamous cell carcinoma.

TAKE-HOME LEARNING POINTS

• Pilomatricomas are benign cysts usually seen on the face, neck, scalp, and arms of children and young adults.
• The typical pilomatricoma (sometimes called calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe) is an intradermal papule or nodule, often displaying a faintly bluish color, that is relatively firm on palpation.
• The contents of a pilomatricoma usually consist of whitish curds or flecks of material that represent calcified tissue mixed with foreign body giant cells.
• Pilomatricoma has little or no malignant potential but is often cosmetically significant.

Dermatologists are prescribing fewer antibiotics for acne and rosacea, but prescribing after dermatologic surgery has increased in the past decade.

In a study published online Jan. 16 in JAMA Dermatology, researchers report the results of a cross-sectional analysis of antibiotic prescribing by 11,986 dermatologists between 2008 and 2016, using commercial claims data.

The analysis showed that, over this period of time, the overall rate of antibiotic prescribing by dermatologists decreased by 36.6%, from 3.36 courses per 100 dermatologist visits to 2.13 courses. In particular, antibiotic prescribing for acne decreased by 28.1%, from 11.76 courses per 100 visits to 8.45 courses, and for rosacea it decreased by 18.1%, from 10.89 courses per 100 visits to 8.92 courses.

John S. Barbieri, MD, of the department of dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, and his coauthors described the overall decline in antibiotic prescribing as “encouraging,” considering that in 2013 dermatologists were identified as the “most frequent prescribers of oral antibiotics per clinician.” The decline resulted in an estimated 480,000 fewer antibiotic courses a year, they noted.

“Much of the decrease in extended courses of antibiotic therapy is associated with visits for acne and rosacea,” they wrote. “Although recent guidelines suggest limiting the duration of therapy in this patient population, course duration has remained stable over time, suggesting that this decrease may be due to fewer patients being treated with antibiotics rather than patients being treated for a shorter duration.”

However, the rate of oral antibiotic prescriptions associated with surgical visits increased by 69.6%, from 3.92 courses per 100 visits to 6.65. This increase was concerning, given the risk of surgical-site infections was low, the authors pointed out. “In addition, a 2008 advisory statement on antibiotic prophylaxis recommends single-dose perioperative antibiotics for patients at increased risk of surgical-site infection,” they added.

The study also noted a 35.3% increase in antibiotic prescribing for cysts and a 3.2% increase for hidradenitis suppurativa.

Over the entire study period, nearly 1 million courses of oral antibiotics were prescribed. Doxycycline hyclate accounted for around one quarter of prescriptions, as did minocycline, while 19.9% of prescriptions were for cephalexin.

“Given the low rate of infectious complications, even for Mohs surgery, and the lack of evidence to support the use of prolonged rather than single-dose perioperative regimens, the postoperative courses of antibiotics identified in this study may increase risks to patients without substantial benefits,” they added.

The study was partly supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Skin Diseases. No conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Barbieri J et al. JAMA Dermatology. 2019 Jan 16. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4944.

Dermatologists are prescribing fewer antibiotics for acne and rosacea, but prescribing after dermatologic surgery has increased in the past decade.

In a study published online Jan. 16 in JAMA Dermatology, researchers report the results of a cross-sectional analysis of antibiotic prescribing by 11,986 dermatologists between 2008 and 2016, using commercial claims data.

The analysis showed that, over this period of time, the overall rate of antibiotic prescribing by dermatologists decreased by 36.6%, from 3.36 courses per 100 dermatologist visits to 2.13 courses. In particular, antibiotic prescribing for acne decreased by 28.1%, from 11.76 courses per 100 visits to 8.45 courses, and for rosacea it decreased by 18.1%, from 10.89 courses per 100 visits to 8.92 courses.

John S. Barbieri, MD, of the department of dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, and his coauthors described the overall decline in antibiotic prescribing as “encouraging,” considering that in 2013 dermatologists were identified as the “most frequent prescribers of oral antibiotics per clinician.” The decline resulted in an estimated 480,000 fewer antibiotic courses a year, they noted.

“Much of the decrease in extended courses of antibiotic therapy is associated with visits for acne and rosacea,” they wrote. “Although recent guidelines suggest limiting the duration of therapy in this patient population, course duration has remained stable over time, suggesting that this decrease may be due to fewer patients being treated with antibiotics rather than patients being treated for a shorter duration.”

However, the rate of oral antibiotic prescriptions associated with surgical visits increased by 69.6%, from 3.92 courses per 100 visits to 6.65. This increase was concerning, given the risk of surgical-site infections was low, the authors pointed out. “In addition, a 2008 advisory statement on antibiotic prophylaxis recommends single-dose perioperative antibiotics for patients at increased risk of surgical-site infection,” they added.

The study also noted a 35.3% increase in antibiotic prescribing for cysts and a 3.2% increase for hidradenitis suppurativa.

Over the entire study period, nearly 1 million courses of oral antibiotics were prescribed. Doxycycline hyclate accounted for around one quarter of prescriptions, as did minocycline, while 19.9% of prescriptions were for cephalexin.

“Given the low rate of infectious complications, even for Mohs surgery, and the lack of evidence to support the use of prolonged rather than single-dose perioperative regimens, the postoperative courses of antibiotics identified in this study may increase risks to patients without substantial benefits,” they added.

The study was partly supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Skin Diseases. No conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Barbieri J et al. JAMA Dermatology. 2019 Jan 16. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4944.

Dermatologists are prescribing fewer antibiotics for acne and rosacea, but prescribing after dermatologic surgery has increased in the past decade.

In a study published online Jan. 16 in JAMA Dermatology, researchers report the results of a cross-sectional analysis of antibiotic prescribing by 11,986 dermatologists between 2008 and 2016, using commercial claims data.

The analysis showed that, over this period of time, the overall rate of antibiotic prescribing by dermatologists decreased by 36.6%, from 3.36 courses per 100 dermatologist visits to 2.13 courses. In particular, antibiotic prescribing for acne decreased by 28.1%, from 11.76 courses per 100 visits to 8.45 courses, and for rosacea it decreased by 18.1%, from 10.89 courses per 100 visits to 8.92 courses.

John S. Barbieri, MD, of the department of dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, and his coauthors described the overall decline in antibiotic prescribing as “encouraging,” considering that in 2013 dermatologists were identified as the “most frequent prescribers of oral antibiotics per clinician.” The decline resulted in an estimated 480,000 fewer antibiotic courses a year, they noted.

“Much of the decrease in extended courses of antibiotic therapy is associated with visits for acne and rosacea,” they wrote. “Although recent guidelines suggest limiting the duration of therapy in this patient population, course duration has remained stable over time, suggesting that this decrease may be due to fewer patients being treated with antibiotics rather than patients being treated for a shorter duration.”

However, the rate of oral antibiotic prescriptions associated with surgical visits increased by 69.6%, from 3.92 courses per 100 visits to 6.65. This increase was concerning, given the risk of surgical-site infections was low, the authors pointed out. “In addition, a 2008 advisory statement on antibiotic prophylaxis recommends single-dose perioperative antibiotics for patients at increased risk of surgical-site infection,” they added.

The study also noted a 35.3% increase in antibiotic prescribing for cysts and a 3.2% increase for hidradenitis suppurativa.

Over the entire study period, nearly 1 million courses of oral antibiotics were prescribed. Doxycycline hyclate accounted for around one quarter of prescriptions, as did minocycline, while 19.9% of prescriptions were for cephalexin.

“Given the low rate of infectious complications, even for Mohs surgery, and the lack of evidence to support the use of prolonged rather than single-dose perioperative regimens, the postoperative courses of antibiotics identified in this study may increase risks to patients without substantial benefits,” they added.

The study was partly supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Skin Diseases. No conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Barbieri J et al. JAMA Dermatology. 2019 Jan 16. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4944.

LAS VEGAS – Gynecologist Michael S. Baggish, MD, offered tips about diagnosis and treatment of vulvar conditions at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

Pubic lice

Treat with malathion 0.5% lotion (Ovide), permethrin 1%-5% (Nix), or lindane 1% (Kwell). Be aware that the U.S. Library of Medicine cautions that lindane can cause serious side effects, and patients should use it only “if there is some reason you cannot use the other medications or if you have tried the other medications and they have not worked.”

Pruritus (itchy skin)

Eliminate possible contact allergens such as soaps, detergents, and undergarments. Swabs with 2% acetic acid solution can assist with general hygiene. It’s important to address secondary infections, and control of diet and stress may be helpful.

Folliculitis (inflammation of hair follicles)

A salt water bath can be helpful. Try 2 cups of “Instant Ocean” – a sea salt product for aquariums – in a shallow bath twice daily.

It can be treated with silver sulfadiazine (Silvadene) cream (three times daily and at bedtime) or clindamycin (Cleocin) cream (three times daily and at bedtime).

Consider a systemic drug after culture results come back if needed.
 

Lichen sclerosus (a skin inflammation also known as white spot disease)

“I see a lot of lichen sclerosus,” Dr. Baggish said. “Every single practice day, I’m seeing two or three [cases].”

Topical treatments include testosterone cream (which has low efficacy) and topical corticosteroid creams and ointments (the standard treatment).

Other treatments provide better and more consistent results: Etretinate (Tegison), a retinoid that is expensive and can produce serious side effects, and injectable dexamethasone (Decadron), which can stop progression.

Be aware that 10% of patients with this condition may develop squamous cell carcinoma. Monitor for any changes in appearance and biopsy if needed.

Behçet’s disease (a blood vessel inflammation disorder also known as silk road disease)

This rare condition can cause mouth and genital ulcers and uveitis (eye inflammation). For treatment, start 40 mg prednisone for 2-3 days, then 20 mg for 2 days, then 10 mg for 4 days, then stop. Start treatment immediately if there are signs of an oral lesion.

Fox-Fordyce disease (an inflammatory response that blocks sweat ducts and causes intense itching)

Treatment includes estrogen (2.5 mg per day) and tretinoin (Retin-A, apply once daily), usually given together. Suggest that patients try the Instant Ocean salt water treatment in the bath once daily (see details above under folliculitis entry).

Genital warts

Vaporize the warts via laser. “If they look like they’re recurring, I put them on interferon for 3 months because otherwise they just keep recurring,” Dr. Baggish said. “You could put topical treatments on them, but they’ll recur.”

Dr. Baggish, of the University of California, San Francisco, had no relevant financial disclosures. The meeting was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

LAS VEGAS – Gynecologist Michael S. Baggish, MD, offered tips about diagnosis and treatment of vulvar conditions at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

Pubic lice

Treat with malathion 0.5% lotion (Ovide), permethrin 1%-5% (Nix), or lindane 1% (Kwell). Be aware that the U.S. Library of Medicine cautions that lindane can cause serious side effects, and patients should use it only “if there is some reason you cannot use the other medications or if you have tried the other medications and they have not worked.”

Pruritus (itchy skin)

Eliminate possible contact allergens such as soaps, detergents, and undergarments. Swabs with 2% acetic acid solution can assist with general hygiene. It’s important to address secondary infections, and control of diet and stress may be helpful.

Folliculitis (inflammation of hair follicles)

A salt water bath can be helpful. Try 2 cups of “Instant Ocean” – a sea salt product for aquariums – in a shallow bath twice daily.

It can be treated with silver sulfadiazine (Silvadene) cream (three times daily and at bedtime) or clindamycin (Cleocin) cream (three times daily and at bedtime).

Consider a systemic drug after culture results come back if needed.
 

Lichen sclerosus (a skin inflammation also known as white spot disease)

“I see a lot of lichen sclerosus,” Dr. Baggish said. “Every single practice day, I’m seeing two or three [cases].”

Topical treatments include testosterone cream (which has low efficacy) and topical corticosteroid creams and ointments (the standard treatment).

Other treatments provide better and more consistent results: Etretinate (Tegison), a retinoid that is expensive and can produce serious side effects, and injectable dexamethasone (Decadron), which can stop progression.

Be aware that 10% of patients with this condition may develop squamous cell carcinoma. Monitor for any changes in appearance and biopsy if needed.

Behçet’s disease (a blood vessel inflammation disorder also known as silk road disease)

This rare condition can cause mouth and genital ulcers and uveitis (eye inflammation). For treatment, start 40 mg prednisone for 2-3 days, then 20 mg for 2 days, then 10 mg for 4 days, then stop. Start treatment immediately if there are signs of an oral lesion.

Fox-Fordyce disease (an inflammatory response that blocks sweat ducts and causes intense itching)

Treatment includes estrogen (2.5 mg per day) and tretinoin (Retin-A, apply once daily), usually given together. Suggest that patients try the Instant Ocean salt water treatment in the bath once daily (see details above under folliculitis entry).

Genital warts

Vaporize the warts via laser. “If they look like they’re recurring, I put them on interferon for 3 months because otherwise they just keep recurring,” Dr. Baggish said. “You could put topical treatments on them, but they’ll recur.”

Dr. Baggish, of the University of California, San Francisco, had no relevant financial disclosures. The meeting was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

LAS VEGAS – Gynecologist Michael S. Baggish, MD, offered tips about diagnosis and treatment of vulvar conditions at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

Pubic lice

Treat with malathion 0.5% lotion (Ovide), permethrin 1%-5% (Nix), or lindane 1% (Kwell). Be aware that the U.S. Library of Medicine cautions that lindane can cause serious side effects, and patients should use it only “if there is some reason you cannot use the other medications or if you have tried the other medications and they have not worked.”

Pruritus (itchy skin)

Eliminate possible contact allergens such as soaps, detergents, and undergarments. Swabs with 2% acetic acid solution can assist with general hygiene. It’s important to address secondary infections, and control of diet and stress may be helpful.

Folliculitis (inflammation of hair follicles)

A salt water bath can be helpful. Try 2 cups of “Instant Ocean” – a sea salt product for aquariums – in a shallow bath twice daily.

It can be treated with silver sulfadiazine (Silvadene) cream (three times daily and at bedtime) or clindamycin (Cleocin) cream (three times daily and at bedtime).

Consider a systemic drug after culture results come back if needed.
 

Lichen sclerosus (a skin inflammation also known as white spot disease)

“I see a lot of lichen sclerosus,” Dr. Baggish said. “Every single practice day, I’m seeing two or three [cases].”

Topical treatments include testosterone cream (which has low efficacy) and topical corticosteroid creams and ointments (the standard treatment).

Other treatments provide better and more consistent results: Etretinate (Tegison), a retinoid that is expensive and can produce serious side effects, and injectable dexamethasone (Decadron), which can stop progression.

Be aware that 10% of patients with this condition may develop squamous cell carcinoma. Monitor for any changes in appearance and biopsy if needed.

Behçet’s disease (a blood vessel inflammation disorder also known as silk road disease)

This rare condition can cause mouth and genital ulcers and uveitis (eye inflammation). For treatment, start 40 mg prednisone for 2-3 days, then 20 mg for 2 days, then 10 mg for 4 days, then stop. Start treatment immediately if there are signs of an oral lesion.

Fox-Fordyce disease (an inflammatory response that blocks sweat ducts and causes intense itching)

Treatment includes estrogen (2.5 mg per day) and tretinoin (Retin-A, apply once daily), usually given together. Suggest that patients try the Instant Ocean salt water treatment in the bath once daily (see details above under folliculitis entry).

Genital warts

Vaporize the warts via laser. “If they look like they’re recurring, I put them on interferon for 3 months because otherwise they just keep recurring,” Dr. Baggish said. “You could put topical treatments on them, but they’ll recur.”

Dr. Baggish, of the University of California, San Francisco, had no relevant financial disclosures. The meeting was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

ORLANDO – When you extend your hand to a new patient, and he reflexively wipes his palm before shaking hands, be alert. It’s possible you’re seeing primary hyperhidrosis, a condition that’s both more common and more disabling than once thought.

Koldunov/iStock/Getty Images

“Looking at the biology of sweating, normally, it’s a good thing – we need it to survive. However, hyperhidrosis is too much of a good thing – it’s an excess of what is needed for normal biology,” said Adam Friedman, MD, speaking at the Orlando Dermatology Aesthetic and Clinical Conference.

Recent data, he pointed out, show that hyperhidrosis is more prevalent than previously thought – about 4.8% of individuals may have the condition, with about half having axillary hyperhidrosis. Symptoms peak in early adulthood, with adults aged 18-54 most affected. “These are the prime working years,” he said.

About 2% of teens are affected, and many adults report that symptoms began before they were 12 years old. Hand hyperhidrosis is a factor for computer and electronic device work, sports, and even handling paper and pencils, noted Dr. Friedman, professor of dermatology at George Washington University, Washington.

“Does it affect quality of life? Yes. We have data to support the impact. The adverse impact is actually greater than that of eczema and psoriasis,” he said, adding that patients won’t always bring up their concerns about sweating. “Often, it’s the patient who apologizes for having sweaty palms or who sticks to the paper on the exam table. It’s worth asking these patients if they are bothered by excessive sweating.”
 

Is it hyperhidrosis?

A 2016 paper defined hyperhidrosis as “a condition that involves chronic excessive sweating of the underarms, hands, feet, face, groin, or other bodily areas, which is much more than what is normal, and occurs regardless of temperature, exercise, or situation, and may have an impact on quality of life” (Arch Dermatol Res. 2016 Dec;308[10]:743-9). The amount of sweating can be four to five times that seen in healthy controls.

Other clues that excess sweating might be hyperhidrosis? General hyperhidrosis is a secondary syndrome that can be caused by a variety of conditions including endocrine and metabolic disorders and malignancies. Drugs and toxins can also cause generalized excessive sweating.

Focal hyperhidrosis can be primary idiopathic disease; some neuropathies and certain spinal diseases and spinal cord injury can also cause focal hyperhidrosis, though not usually in the axillary/palmar/plantar distribution seen in primary hyperhidrosis.

Before settling on primary hyperhidrosis, the history and exam should also account for other possibilities in the differential: social anxiety disorder, eccrine nevus, gustatory sweating, Frey syndrome, and impaired evaporation could all account for excess sweating, which is also a postsurgical phenomenon for some patients.

Diagnostic criteria call for “focal, visible, excessive sweating” persisting for at least 6 months with no apparent cause. Additionally, patients must have at least two of the additional following criteria: sweating that is bilateral and symmetric, occurs at least once weekly, impairs daily activities, and starts before age 25 years, as well as a positive family history of hyperhidrosis and cessation of sweating during sleep.

The last point is critical, Dr. Friedman said. “If you sweat a lot at night, it’s not hyperhidrosis!”

Though gravimetric evaluation is used in hyperhidrosis research, the history and exam are really where the diagnosis is made in practice, he noted. The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale is a brief, useful clinical tool that asks patients to peg the extent to which their sweating interferes with daily life.
 

Topical treatments to try

Topical antiperspirants and other topical agents are a logical place to start and may be required as part of step therapy by insurers. Many patients will already have tried clinical strength over-the-counter antiperspirants containing aluminum zirconium trichlorohydrex, but these products rate low in patient satisfaction among those with primary hyperhidrosis.

Prescription aluminum salts can be compounded to various strengths, with 10%-20% concentration appropriate for axillae and 30%-40% a good strength for palms and soles, according to Dr. Friedman. All of these agents work by precipitating out solids that form a shallow plug in sweat ducts, slowing the flow of perspiration.

Pearls for topical treatment include the need for the product to be on the skin for 6-8 hours overnight. “Remember hyperhidrosis patients do not sweat at night,” so this is the time when the occlusive plugs can form. Then residue can be washed off in the morning, and patients can apply a deodorant. “I remind my patients that antiperspirants are for sweating, and deodorants are for odor,” said Dr. Friedman. These products can damage fabric, and they can be irritating, a problem addressed with low-potency topical steroids.

Topical regimens don’t need to be adjusted for pediatric patients, said Dr. Friedman.

Iontophoresis has been around since the 1950s, is effective, has few side effects, and is considered first-line treatment for severe palmar and plantar hyperhidrosis. But he said there’s one big rub: time. To be effective, patients need 20-30 minutes of application of 15-20 milliamperes of current 3-4 times weekly, not a schedule that works for most patients or practitioners, Dr. Friedman noted.

A treatment recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for primary axillary hyperhidrosis is a topical anticholinergic, glycopyrronium tosylate, applied with wipes impregnated with glycopyrronium solution. This product significantly outperformed placebo in two clinical trials, with up to 64% of users meeting the primary endpoint of improving by at least 4 points on the Axillary Sweating Daily Diary (ASDD) scale. This product significantly outperformed placebo in two clinical trials, with 53% and 66% of users meeting the primary endpoint, improvement of at least 4 points from baseline in the weekly mean ASDD Item #2. It was approved in those aged 9 years and older.

“You can use this in kids, but you need to educate the kid and the parent or adult,” he said. “This is the last thing you do before bed, after brushing your teeth and after washing your face.”

Patients should apply one swipe to the clean skin of each underarm, and then wash their hands thoroughly. Clinical trials saw a greater proportion of off-target effects such as dry eyes and mouth and mydriasis in the active arm; unilateral mydriasis was more common than bilateral, underscoring the importance of hand washing as this was probably secondary transfer from hands to face during sleep, said Dr. Friedman. Patients can expect results in 2-3 weeks, and doses can be held as needed for anticholinergic side effects.

Systemic choices are limited

There are no FDA-approved systemic agents for hyperhidrosis, and the literature holds only case reports or small series, Dr. Friedman pointed out.

Though systemic treatment may be more effective in generalized hyperhidrosis and for patients with dysautonomia-associated hyperhidrosis, glycopyrrolate is a logical choice if a systemic anticholinergic is desired. A starting dose of 1 mg twice daily can be titrated for effect to about 6 mg daily. Though off-target effects may be a dose-limiting factor, glycopyrrolate is not very lipid soluble, so it penetrates the blood-brain barrier relatively poorly, he said.

Oxybutynin is available in many forms, including a slow-release tablet that permits once-daily dosing. Starting at 5-10 mg daily is a good idea, but dosing may need to be increased to as high as 20 mg daily to be effective. However, patients will often experience “major side effects” with oxybutynin, including significant xerostomia, constipation, blurred vision, and difficulty urinating.

For children, small studies have seen improvement with glycopyrrolate at an average dose of about 2 mg/day. Oxybutynin, which has been extensively studied in the pediatric population, was also effective, but central nervous system adverse events were common.

For some, beta-adrenergic blockade can be an extremely valuable tool, said Dr. Friedman. When sweating is linked to social phobia or performance anxiety, 10-20 mg of atenolol about an hour before the performance or public appearance can make a big difference. Bradycardia, atrioventricular block, and asthma are all contraindications, and the usual precautions should be taken with a host of other comorbidities, he noted.

It’s a good idea to check resting blood pressure and heart rate and take body mass into consideration, and adjust the dose downward appropriately. A key pearl: “Have them do a test run at home, to make sure they don’t keel over on the podium!” said Dr. Friedman.
 

Botulinum toxin tips and tricks

Botulinum toxin can be very effective and works directly by blocking acetylcholine release at the junction of the sympathetic sudomotor neuron and the sweat gland.

Before treatment, make sure the patient prepares correctly by abstaining from over-the-counter deodorants or antiperspirants, and resting without exertion or drinking hot beverages for about 30 minutes before the procedure.

To ascertain the follicular outline of the area to be injected, the iodine starch test can be used: Paint the axilla with iodine, allow it to dry, and then dust corn starch over the area. The follicular outline is mapped by the purple-blue reaction of the starch and iodine in the presence of moisture from perspiration, Dr. Friedman said.

Applying topical analgesia 30 minutes prior to the procedure helps with patient discomfort with axillary injections. When it comes time to inject, a shallow approach with the bevel side up works well, with a goal of blanketing the field identified by the iodine starch test with small aliquots of toxin placed 1-2 centimeters apart, said Dr. Friedman. However, for patients who might have tattoos that extend to the axillary area, “Avoid the ink!”

Patients will start to see improvement within 2-4 days, and although the literature says a toxin treatment can last 6-9 months, Dr. Friedman said he sees patients coming back in 4-5 months.

Obtaining botulinum toxin can be done in one of two ways: the “buy and bill” approach has the dermatologist purchasing the medication, using CPT 64650 and J code J0585 – “Remember the units!” said Dr. Friedman, because reimbursement will be based on the volume of toxin purchased.. This route may be cheaper for the patient because it avoids a medication copay. The physician obtains preauthorization for both the medication and procedure with this strategy.

The other route is to have the provider prescribe botulinum toxin and the patient purchase it at a regular or specialty pharmacy. In this case, the pharmacist obtains precertification for the medication, but the physician still needs to be precertified – and bill – for the injection procedure itself. This scenario is less risky for the physician but may trigger two separate copays for the patient.

Botulinum toxin can be effective for up to 90% of patients, but at a cost: Without insurance reimbursement, treatments can cost in the neighborhood of $1,500.

A good resource for patients and clinicians is the International Hyperhidrosis Society’s website (sweathelp.org), said Dr. Friedman.

Dr. Friedman disclosed relationships with multiple pharmaceutical and cosmetic companies, including Dermira, which markets topical glycopyrronium tosylate as Qbrexza.

[email protected]

ORLANDO – When you extend your hand to a new patient, and he reflexively wipes his palm before shaking hands, be alert. It’s possible you’re seeing primary hyperhidrosis, a condition that’s both more common and more disabling than once thought.

Koldunov/iStock/Getty Images

“Looking at the biology of sweating, normally, it’s a good thing – we need it to survive. However, hyperhidrosis is too much of a good thing – it’s an excess of what is needed for normal biology,” said Adam Friedman, MD, speaking at the Orlando Dermatology Aesthetic and Clinical Conference.

Recent data, he pointed out, show that hyperhidrosis is more prevalent than previously thought – about 4.8% of individuals may have the condition, with about half having axillary hyperhidrosis. Symptoms peak in early adulthood, with adults aged 18-54 most affected. “These are the prime working years,” he said.

About 2% of teens are affected, and many adults report that symptoms began before they were 12 years old. Hand hyperhidrosis is a factor for computer and electronic device work, sports, and even handling paper and pencils, noted Dr. Friedman, professor of dermatology at George Washington University, Washington.

“Does it affect quality of life? Yes. We have data to support the impact. The adverse impact is actually greater than that of eczema and psoriasis,” he said, adding that patients won’t always bring up their concerns about sweating. “Often, it’s the patient who apologizes for having sweaty palms or who sticks to the paper on the exam table. It’s worth asking these patients if they are bothered by excessive sweating.”
 

Is it hyperhidrosis?

A 2016 paper defined hyperhidrosis as “a condition that involves chronic excessive sweating of the underarms, hands, feet, face, groin, or other bodily areas, which is much more than what is normal, and occurs regardless of temperature, exercise, or situation, and may have an impact on quality of life” (Arch Dermatol Res. 2016 Dec;308[10]:743-9). The amount of sweating can be four to five times that seen in healthy controls.

Other clues that excess sweating might be hyperhidrosis? General hyperhidrosis is a secondary syndrome that can be caused by a variety of conditions including endocrine and metabolic disorders and malignancies. Drugs and toxins can also cause generalized excessive sweating.

Focal hyperhidrosis can be primary idiopathic disease; some neuropathies and certain spinal diseases and spinal cord injury can also cause focal hyperhidrosis, though not usually in the axillary/palmar/plantar distribution seen in primary hyperhidrosis.

Before settling on primary hyperhidrosis, the history and exam should also account for other possibilities in the differential: social anxiety disorder, eccrine nevus, gustatory sweating, Frey syndrome, and impaired evaporation could all account for excess sweating, which is also a postsurgical phenomenon for some patients.

Diagnostic criteria call for “focal, visible, excessive sweating” persisting for at least 6 months with no apparent cause. Additionally, patients must have at least two of the additional following criteria: sweating that is bilateral and symmetric, occurs at least once weekly, impairs daily activities, and starts before age 25 years, as well as a positive family history of hyperhidrosis and cessation of sweating during sleep.

The last point is critical, Dr. Friedman said. “If you sweat a lot at night, it’s not hyperhidrosis!”

Though gravimetric evaluation is used in hyperhidrosis research, the history and exam are really where the diagnosis is made in practice, he noted. The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale is a brief, useful clinical tool that asks patients to peg the extent to which their sweating interferes with daily life.
 

Topical treatments to try

Topical antiperspirants and other topical agents are a logical place to start and may be required as part of step therapy by insurers. Many patients will already have tried clinical strength over-the-counter antiperspirants containing aluminum zirconium trichlorohydrex, but these products rate low in patient satisfaction among those with primary hyperhidrosis.

Prescription aluminum salts can be compounded to various strengths, with 10%-20% concentration appropriate for axillae and 30%-40% a good strength for palms and soles, according to Dr. Friedman. All of these agents work by precipitating out solids that form a shallow plug in sweat ducts, slowing the flow of perspiration.

Pearls for topical treatment include the need for the product to be on the skin for 6-8 hours overnight. “Remember hyperhidrosis patients do not sweat at night,” so this is the time when the occlusive plugs can form. Then residue can be washed off in the morning, and patients can apply a deodorant. “I remind my patients that antiperspirants are for sweating, and deodorants are for odor,” said Dr. Friedman. These products can damage fabric, and they can be irritating, a problem addressed with low-potency topical steroids.

Topical regimens don’t need to be adjusted for pediatric patients, said Dr. Friedman.

Iontophoresis has been around since the 1950s, is effective, has few side effects, and is considered first-line treatment for severe palmar and plantar hyperhidrosis. But he said there’s one big rub: time. To be effective, patients need 20-30 minutes of application of 15-20 milliamperes of current 3-4 times weekly, not a schedule that works for most patients or practitioners, Dr. Friedman noted.

A treatment recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for primary axillary hyperhidrosis is a topical anticholinergic, glycopyrronium tosylate, applied with wipes impregnated with glycopyrronium solution. This product significantly outperformed placebo in two clinical trials, with up to 64% of users meeting the primary endpoint of improving by at least 4 points on the Axillary Sweating Daily Diary (ASDD) scale. This product significantly outperformed placebo in two clinical trials, with 53% and 66% of users meeting the primary endpoint, improvement of at least 4 points from baseline in the weekly mean ASDD Item #2. It was approved in those aged 9 years and older.

“You can use this in kids, but you need to educate the kid and the parent or adult,” he said. “This is the last thing you do before bed, after brushing your teeth and after washing your face.”

Patients should apply one swipe to the clean skin of each underarm, and then wash their hands thoroughly. Clinical trials saw a greater proportion of off-target effects such as dry eyes and mouth and mydriasis in the active arm; unilateral mydriasis was more common than bilateral, underscoring the importance of hand washing as this was probably secondary transfer from hands to face during sleep, said Dr. Friedman. Patients can expect results in 2-3 weeks, and doses can be held as needed for anticholinergic side effects.

Systemic choices are limited

There are no FDA-approved systemic agents for hyperhidrosis, and the literature holds only case reports or small series, Dr. Friedman pointed out.

Though systemic treatment may be more effective in generalized hyperhidrosis and for patients with dysautonomia-associated hyperhidrosis, glycopyrrolate is a logical choice if a systemic anticholinergic is desired. A starting dose of 1 mg twice daily can be titrated for effect to about 6 mg daily. Though off-target effects may be a dose-limiting factor, glycopyrrolate is not very lipid soluble, so it penetrates the blood-brain barrier relatively poorly, he said.

Oxybutynin is available in many forms, including a slow-release tablet that permits once-daily dosing. Starting at 5-10 mg daily is a good idea, but dosing may need to be increased to as high as 20 mg daily to be effective. However, patients will often experience “major side effects” with oxybutynin, including significant xerostomia, constipation, blurred vision, and difficulty urinating.

For children, small studies have seen improvement with glycopyrrolate at an average dose of about 2 mg/day. Oxybutynin, which has been extensively studied in the pediatric population, was also effective, but central nervous system adverse events were common.

For some, beta-adrenergic blockade can be an extremely valuable tool, said Dr. Friedman. When sweating is linked to social phobia or performance anxiety, 10-20 mg of atenolol about an hour before the performance or public appearance can make a big difference. Bradycardia, atrioventricular block, and asthma are all contraindications, and the usual precautions should be taken with a host of other comorbidities, he noted.

It’s a good idea to check resting blood pressure and heart rate and take body mass into consideration, and adjust the dose downward appropriately. A key pearl: “Have them do a test run at home, to make sure they don’t keel over on the podium!” said Dr. Friedman.
 

Botulinum toxin tips and tricks

Botulinum toxin can be very effective and works directly by blocking acetylcholine release at the junction of the sympathetic sudomotor neuron and the sweat gland.

Before treatment, make sure the patient prepares correctly by abstaining from over-the-counter deodorants or antiperspirants, and resting without exertion or drinking hot beverages for about 30 minutes before the procedure.

To ascertain the follicular outline of the area to be injected, the iodine starch test can be used: Paint the axilla with iodine, allow it to dry, and then dust corn starch over the area. The follicular outline is mapped by the purple-blue reaction of the starch and iodine in the presence of moisture from perspiration, Dr. Friedman said.

Applying topical analgesia 30 minutes prior to the procedure helps with patient discomfort with axillary injections. When it comes time to inject, a shallow approach with the bevel side up works well, with a goal of blanketing the field identified by the iodine starch test with small aliquots of toxin placed 1-2 centimeters apart, said Dr. Friedman. However, for patients who might have tattoos that extend to the axillary area, “Avoid the ink!”

Patients will start to see improvement within 2-4 days, and although the literature says a toxin treatment can last 6-9 months, Dr. Friedman said he sees patients coming back in 4-5 months.

Obtaining botulinum toxin can be done in one of two ways: the “buy and bill” approach has the dermatologist purchasing the medication, using CPT 64650 and J code J0585 – “Remember the units!” said Dr. Friedman, because reimbursement will be based on the volume of toxin purchased.. This route may be cheaper for the patient because it avoids a medication copay. The physician obtains preauthorization for both the medication and procedure with this strategy.

The other route is to have the provider prescribe botulinum toxin and the patient purchase it at a regular or specialty pharmacy. In this case, the pharmacist obtains precertification for the medication, but the physician still needs to be precertified – and bill – for the injection procedure itself. This scenario is less risky for the physician but may trigger two separate copays for the patient.

Botulinum toxin can be effective for up to 90% of patients, but at a cost: Without insurance reimbursement, treatments can cost in the neighborhood of $1,500.

A good resource for patients and clinicians is the International Hyperhidrosis Society’s website (sweathelp.org), said Dr. Friedman.

Dr. Friedman disclosed relationships with multiple pharmaceutical and cosmetic companies, including Dermira, which markets topical glycopyrronium tosylate as Qbrexza.

[email protected]

ORLANDO – When you extend your hand to a new patient, and he reflexively wipes his palm before shaking hands, be alert. It’s possible you’re seeing primary hyperhidrosis, a condition that’s both more common and more disabling than once thought.

Koldunov/iStock/Getty Images

“Looking at the biology of sweating, normally, it’s a good thing – we need it to survive. However, hyperhidrosis is too much of a good thing – it’s an excess of what is needed for normal biology,” said Adam Friedman, MD, speaking at the Orlando Dermatology Aesthetic and Clinical Conference.

Recent data, he pointed out, show that hyperhidrosis is more prevalent than previously thought – about 4.8% of individuals may have the condition, with about half having axillary hyperhidrosis. Symptoms peak in early adulthood, with adults aged 18-54 most affected. “These are the prime working years,” he said.

About 2% of teens are affected, and many adults report that symptoms began before they were 12 years old. Hand hyperhidrosis is a factor for computer and electronic device work, sports, and even handling paper and pencils, noted Dr. Friedman, professor of dermatology at George Washington University, Washington.

“Does it affect quality of life? Yes. We have data to support the impact. The adverse impact is actually greater than that of eczema and psoriasis,” he said, adding that patients won’t always bring up their concerns about sweating. “Often, it’s the patient who apologizes for having sweaty palms or who sticks to the paper on the exam table. It’s worth asking these patients if they are bothered by excessive sweating.”
 

Is it hyperhidrosis?

A 2016 paper defined hyperhidrosis as “a condition that involves chronic excessive sweating of the underarms, hands, feet, face, groin, or other bodily areas, which is much more than what is normal, and occurs regardless of temperature, exercise, or situation, and may have an impact on quality of life” (Arch Dermatol Res. 2016 Dec;308[10]:743-9). The amount of sweating can be four to five times that seen in healthy controls.

Other clues that excess sweating might be hyperhidrosis? General hyperhidrosis is a secondary syndrome that can be caused by a variety of conditions including endocrine and metabolic disorders and malignancies. Drugs and toxins can also cause generalized excessive sweating.

Focal hyperhidrosis can be primary idiopathic disease; some neuropathies and certain spinal diseases and spinal cord injury can also cause focal hyperhidrosis, though not usually in the axillary/palmar/plantar distribution seen in primary hyperhidrosis.

Before settling on primary hyperhidrosis, the history and exam should also account for other possibilities in the differential: social anxiety disorder, eccrine nevus, gustatory sweating, Frey syndrome, and impaired evaporation could all account for excess sweating, which is also a postsurgical phenomenon for some patients.

Diagnostic criteria call for “focal, visible, excessive sweating” persisting for at least 6 months with no apparent cause. Additionally, patients must have at least two of the additional following criteria: sweating that is bilateral and symmetric, occurs at least once weekly, impairs daily activities, and starts before age 25 years, as well as a positive family history of hyperhidrosis and cessation of sweating during sleep.

The last point is critical, Dr. Friedman said. “If you sweat a lot at night, it’s not hyperhidrosis!”

Though gravimetric evaluation is used in hyperhidrosis research, the history and exam are really where the diagnosis is made in practice, he noted. The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale is a brief, useful clinical tool that asks patients to peg the extent to which their sweating interferes with daily life.
 

Topical treatments to try

Topical antiperspirants and other topical agents are a logical place to start and may be required as part of step therapy by insurers. Many patients will already have tried clinical strength over-the-counter antiperspirants containing aluminum zirconium trichlorohydrex, but these products rate low in patient satisfaction among those with primary hyperhidrosis.

Prescription aluminum salts can be compounded to various strengths, with 10%-20% concentration appropriate for axillae and 30%-40% a good strength for palms and soles, according to Dr. Friedman. All of these agents work by precipitating out solids that form a shallow plug in sweat ducts, slowing the flow of perspiration.

Pearls for topical treatment include the need for the product to be on the skin for 6-8 hours overnight. “Remember hyperhidrosis patients do not sweat at night,” so this is the time when the occlusive plugs can form. Then residue can be washed off in the morning, and patients can apply a deodorant. “I remind my patients that antiperspirants are for sweating, and deodorants are for odor,” said Dr. Friedman. These products can damage fabric, and they can be irritating, a problem addressed with low-potency topical steroids.

Topical regimens don’t need to be adjusted for pediatric patients, said Dr. Friedman.

Iontophoresis has been around since the 1950s, is effective, has few side effects, and is considered first-line treatment for severe palmar and plantar hyperhidrosis. But he said there’s one big rub: time. To be effective, patients need 20-30 minutes of application of 15-20 milliamperes of current 3-4 times weekly, not a schedule that works for most patients or practitioners, Dr. Friedman noted.

A treatment recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for primary axillary hyperhidrosis is a topical anticholinergic, glycopyrronium tosylate, applied with wipes impregnated with glycopyrronium solution. This product significantly outperformed placebo in two clinical trials, with up to 64% of users meeting the primary endpoint of improving by at least 4 points on the Axillary Sweating Daily Diary (ASDD) scale. This product significantly outperformed placebo in two clinical trials, with 53% and 66% of users meeting the primary endpoint, improvement of at least 4 points from baseline in the weekly mean ASDD Item #2. It was approved in those aged 9 years and older.

“You can use this in kids, but you need to educate the kid and the parent or adult,” he said. “This is the last thing you do before bed, after brushing your teeth and after washing your face.”

Patients should apply one swipe to the clean skin of each underarm, and then wash their hands thoroughly. Clinical trials saw a greater proportion of off-target effects such as dry eyes and mouth and mydriasis in the active arm; unilateral mydriasis was more common than bilateral, underscoring the importance of hand washing as this was probably secondary transfer from hands to face during sleep, said Dr. Friedman. Patients can expect results in 2-3 weeks, and doses can be held as needed for anticholinergic side effects.

Systemic choices are limited

There are no FDA-approved systemic agents for hyperhidrosis, and the literature holds only case reports or small series, Dr. Friedman pointed out.

Though systemic treatment may be more effective in generalized hyperhidrosis and for patients with dysautonomia-associated hyperhidrosis, glycopyrrolate is a logical choice if a systemic anticholinergic is desired. A starting dose of 1 mg twice daily can be titrated for effect to about 6 mg daily. Though off-target effects may be a dose-limiting factor, glycopyrrolate is not very lipid soluble, so it penetrates the blood-brain barrier relatively poorly, he said.

Oxybutynin is available in many forms, including a slow-release tablet that permits once-daily dosing. Starting at 5-10 mg daily is a good idea, but dosing may need to be increased to as high as 20 mg daily to be effective. However, patients will often experience “major side effects” with oxybutynin, including significant xerostomia, constipation, blurred vision, and difficulty urinating.

For children, small studies have seen improvement with glycopyrrolate at an average dose of about 2 mg/day. Oxybutynin, which has been extensively studied in the pediatric population, was also effective, but central nervous system adverse events were common.

For some, beta-adrenergic blockade can be an extremely valuable tool, said Dr. Friedman. When sweating is linked to social phobia or performance anxiety, 10-20 mg of atenolol about an hour before the performance or public appearance can make a big difference. Bradycardia, atrioventricular block, and asthma are all contraindications, and the usual precautions should be taken with a host of other comorbidities, he noted.

It’s a good idea to check resting blood pressure and heart rate and take body mass into consideration, and adjust the dose downward appropriately. A key pearl: “Have them do a test run at home, to make sure they don’t keel over on the podium!” said Dr. Friedman.
 

Botulinum toxin tips and tricks

Botulinum toxin can be very effective and works directly by blocking acetylcholine release at the junction of the sympathetic sudomotor neuron and the sweat gland.

Before treatment, make sure the patient prepares correctly by abstaining from over-the-counter deodorants or antiperspirants, and resting without exertion or drinking hot beverages for about 30 minutes before the procedure.

To ascertain the follicular outline of the area to be injected, the iodine starch test can be used: Paint the axilla with iodine, allow it to dry, and then dust corn starch over the area. The follicular outline is mapped by the purple-blue reaction of the starch and iodine in the presence of moisture from perspiration, Dr. Friedman said.

Applying topical analgesia 30 minutes prior to the procedure helps with patient discomfort with axillary injections. When it comes time to inject, a shallow approach with the bevel side up works well, with a goal of blanketing the field identified by the iodine starch test with small aliquots of toxin placed 1-2 centimeters apart, said Dr. Friedman. However, for patients who might have tattoos that extend to the axillary area, “Avoid the ink!”

Patients will start to see improvement within 2-4 days, and although the literature says a toxin treatment can last 6-9 months, Dr. Friedman said he sees patients coming back in 4-5 months.

Obtaining botulinum toxin can be done in one of two ways: the “buy and bill” approach has the dermatologist purchasing the medication, using CPT 64650 and J code J0585 – “Remember the units!” said Dr. Friedman, because reimbursement will be based on the volume of toxin purchased.. This route may be cheaper for the patient because it avoids a medication copay. The physician obtains preauthorization for both the medication and procedure with this strategy.

The other route is to have the provider prescribe botulinum toxin and the patient purchase it at a regular or specialty pharmacy. In this case, the pharmacist obtains precertification for the medication, but the physician still needs to be precertified – and bill – for the injection procedure itself. This scenario is less risky for the physician but may trigger two separate copays for the patient.

Botulinum toxin can be effective for up to 90% of patients, but at a cost: Without insurance reimbursement, treatments can cost in the neighborhood of $1,500.

A good resource for patients and clinicians is the International Hyperhidrosis Society’s website (sweathelp.org), said Dr. Friedman.

Dr. Friedman disclosed relationships with multiple pharmaceutical and cosmetic companies, including Dermira, which markets topical glycopyrronium tosylate as Qbrexza.

[email protected]

Rosacea has several known comorbidities, but the widespread use of their relative, rather than absolute, risks “may result in overestimation of the clinical importance of exposures,” Leonardo A. Tjahjono and his associates wrote.

For a patient with rosacea, the relative risk of hepatic cancer is 1.42, but the attributable risk and the number needed to harm (NNH), which provide “a clearer, absolute picture regarding the association” with rosacea, are 0.46 per 10,000 patient-years and 21,645, respectively. The relative risk of comorbid breast cancer is 1.25, compared with an attributable risk of 6.23 per 10,000 patient-years and an NNH of 1,606, Mr. Tjahjono of Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, N.C., and his associates reported in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.


Physician misconceptions based on patients’ relative risks of comorbidities may lead to increased cancer screenings, which “can provide great benefit in a proper context; however, they are not without consequences. For example, 0.7 % of liver biopsies result in severe intraperitoneal hematoma,” the investigators said.

The absolute risks – calculated by the investigators using cohort studies that were conducted from June 1, 2008, to June 1, 2018 – present “a better understanding regarding rosacea’s impact on public health and clinical settings, “ they wrote.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Tjahjono LA et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jan 14. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.013.

Rosacea has several known comorbidities, but the widespread use of their relative, rather than absolute, risks “may result in overestimation of the clinical importance of exposures,” Leonardo A. Tjahjono and his associates wrote.

For a patient with rosacea, the relative risk of hepatic cancer is 1.42, but the attributable risk and the number needed to harm (NNH), which provide “a clearer, absolute picture regarding the association” with rosacea, are 0.46 per 10,000 patient-years and 21,645, respectively. The relative risk of comorbid breast cancer is 1.25, compared with an attributable risk of 6.23 per 10,000 patient-years and an NNH of 1,606, Mr. Tjahjono of Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, N.C., and his associates reported in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.


Physician misconceptions based on patients’ relative risks of comorbidities may lead to increased cancer screenings, which “can provide great benefit in a proper context; however, they are not without consequences. For example, 0.7 % of liver biopsies result in severe intraperitoneal hematoma,” the investigators said.

The absolute risks – calculated by the investigators using cohort studies that were conducted from June 1, 2008, to June 1, 2018 – present “a better understanding regarding rosacea’s impact on public health and clinical settings, “ they wrote.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Tjahjono LA et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jan 14. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.013.

Rosacea has several known comorbidities, but the widespread use of their relative, rather than absolute, risks “may result in overestimation of the clinical importance of exposures,” Leonardo A. Tjahjono and his associates wrote.

For a patient with rosacea, the relative risk of hepatic cancer is 1.42, but the attributable risk and the number needed to harm (NNH), which provide “a clearer, absolute picture regarding the association” with rosacea, are 0.46 per 10,000 patient-years and 21,645, respectively. The relative risk of comorbid breast cancer is 1.25, compared with an attributable risk of 6.23 per 10,000 patient-years and an NNH of 1,606, Mr. Tjahjono of Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, N.C., and his associates reported in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.


Physician misconceptions based on patients’ relative risks of comorbidities may lead to increased cancer screenings, which “can provide great benefit in a proper context; however, they are not without consequences. For example, 0.7 % of liver biopsies result in severe intraperitoneal hematoma,” the investigators said.

The absolute risks – calculated by the investigators using cohort studies that were conducted from June 1, 2008, to June 1, 2018 – present “a better understanding regarding rosacea’s impact on public health and clinical settings, “ they wrote.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Tjahjono LA et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jan 14. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.013.

A 3-year-old girl presented with a rapidly progressing rash. The rash began the previous day with redness around her lips and nose (FIGURE 1). Twelve hours later, the rash had progressed to involve her neck, trunk, and inguinal area (FIGURE 2). The child’s parents reported that she had no recent illnesses or treatment with antibiotics.

On physical examination, she was febrile (101.8° F) and irritable throughout the encounter. She had perioral and nasolabial erythema and dryness. Her lips were dry with no intraoral mucosal lesions, and her conjunctiva was clear. She had a tender erythrodermal rash that was most prominent on her neck folds, back, and inguinal folds. Superficial layers of skin sloughed off when pressure was applied to areas along her back.

WHAT IS YOUR DIAGNOSIS?
HOW WOULD YOU TREAT THIS PATIENT?

Based on the patient’s classic presentation and exam findings, the physician suspected staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome. SSSS is a rare but serious condition that progresses quickly with high fevers and diffuse painful erythema. The exact epidemiology of SSSS is unclear; some articles report incidences between 0.09 and 0.13 cases per 1 million people.¹ The mortality rate is about 5% due to complications of sepsis, superinfection, and electrolyte disturbances.²

SSSS is caused by Staphylococcus aureus from a localized source that produces exfoliative toxins A and B that spread hematogenously, causing extensive epidermal damage. Exotoxins bind to desmosomes, causing skin cells to lose adherence.³ Histopathology shows intraepidermal cleavage through the stratum granulosum.

Infants and younger children appear more likely to be affected by SSSS, although it may occur in older children or adults who are immunocompromised. It may be that younger children are most susceptible due to a lack of antibodies to the toxin produced or because of a delayed clearance of the toxin-antibody complex from an immature renal system.

Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome progresses quickly, with high fevers and diffuse, painful erythema.

What you’ll see. Patients with SSSS may have a prodrome of irritability, malaise, and fever. The rash is first noticeable as erythema in the flexural areas.⁴ The erythematous tender patches spread and coalesce into a scarlatiniform erythema. Fragile bullae become large sheets of epidermis that slough (a positive Nikolsky’s sign).⁵ The desquamated areas can exhibit a scalded appearance.³

Differential diagnosis includes TEN and SJS

There is a broad differential for vesiculobullous rashes, ranging from self-limiting conditions to those that are life threatening.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), and erythema multiforme major (EMM) are immunological reactions to certain drugs or infections varying in the severity of their presentation. EMM, SJS, and TEN involve the mucosal surfaces, while SSSS does not. The histopathology of these conditions also differs from SSSS as they have keratinocyte necrosis of varying levels of the skin, whereas SSSS only involves the epidermis.

SSSS also may be confused with drug reactions, such as DRESS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) syndrome. DRESS typically is associated with anticonvulsants and sulfonamides and may have peripheral eosinophilia and a transaminitis.⁴

Continue to: Other more self-limited vesiculobullous rashes...

Other more self-limited vesiculobullous rashes include human enteroviruses such as coxsackie virus (hand-foot-mouth disease), echovirus, and enterovirus. However, unlike SSSS, which only affects the epidermis, these disorders may produce epidermal necrosis resulting in epidermal-dermal separation and mucocutaneous blistering.⁴

Making the diagnosis

When a patient has classic SSSS, the diagnosis can be made based on exam findings and the patient’s history. Families will usually report a generalized rash in neonates with desquamation of the entire skin. Fever is often present. Recent exposures to other family members with skin and soft-tissue infections is a possibility. If there is doubt, a skin biopsy can be obtained for histology. Lab work may reveal an elevated white blood cell count; blood culture is often negative.

The primary site of S aureus infection is usually the nasopharynx, causing a mild upper respiratory tract infection; therefore, nasopharyngeal cultures may be positive.⁴ Cultures can also be drawn from blood, wounds, nares, and ocular exudates if there is suspicion. Cultures from the actual blisters are typically negative, as the toxin—not the actual bacteria—is responsible for the blistering. Unlike adults who experience SSSS, children typically have negative blood cultures.⁴

Prompt treatment is essential

Swift diagnosis and management of SSSS is important due to the risk of severe disease. It is important to start antibiotics early because methicillin-sensitive S aureus is a predominant cause of SSSS.² The epidemiology of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) continues to shift. A recent study suggests that empiric therapy with penicillinase-resistant penicillins, along with clindamycin, be employed until culture sensitivities are available to guide therapy.² Local resistance patterns to S aureus should help guide initial empiric antibiotic treatment. Patients should receive intravenous (IV) fluids to compensate for insensible fluid losses similar to an extensive burn wound. Wound dressings placed over sloughed skin can help prevent secondary infection.² Lastly, the use of anti-inflammatory drugs and opiates often depends upon the extent of pain the patient experiences.

Our patient was immediately started on IV clindamycin 10 mg/kg tid and IV fluids. She was given morphine 0.01 mg/kg for pain control. As expected, cultures of her nasopharynx, blood, and vulva did not grow S aureus. Although no organism was isolated, her rash rapidly improved, and she was discharged home to complete a 10-day oral course of clindamycin 10 mg/kg tid.

CORRESPONDENCE
Nicholas M. Potisek, MD, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157; [email protected]

A 3-year-old girl presented with a rapidly progressing rash. The rash began the previous day with redness around her lips and nose (FIGURE 1). Twelve hours later, the rash had progressed to involve her neck, trunk, and inguinal area (FIGURE 2). The child’s parents reported that she had no recent illnesses or treatment with antibiotics.

On physical examination, she was febrile (101.8° F) and irritable throughout the encounter. She had perioral and nasolabial erythema and dryness. Her lips were dry with no intraoral mucosal lesions, and her conjunctiva was clear. She had a tender erythrodermal rash that was most prominent on her neck folds, back, and inguinal folds. Superficial layers of skin sloughed off when pressure was applied to areas along her back.

WHAT IS YOUR DIAGNOSIS?
HOW WOULD YOU TREAT THIS PATIENT?

Based on the patient’s classic presentation and exam findings, the physician suspected staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome. SSSS is a rare but serious condition that progresses quickly with high fevers and diffuse painful erythema. The exact epidemiology of SSSS is unclear; some articles report incidences between 0.09 and 0.13 cases per 1 million people.¹ The mortality rate is about 5% due to complications of sepsis, superinfection, and electrolyte disturbances.²

SSSS is caused by Staphylococcus aureus from a localized source that produces exfoliative toxins A and B that spread hematogenously, causing extensive epidermal damage. Exotoxins bind to desmosomes, causing skin cells to lose adherence.³ Histopathology shows intraepidermal cleavage through the stratum granulosum.

Infants and younger children appear more likely to be affected by SSSS, although it may occur in older children or adults who are immunocompromised. It may be that younger children are most susceptible due to a lack of antibodies to the toxin produced or because of a delayed clearance of the toxin-antibody complex from an immature renal system.

Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome progresses quickly, with high fevers and diffuse, painful erythema.

What you’ll see. Patients with SSSS may have a prodrome of irritability, malaise, and fever. The rash is first noticeable as erythema in the flexural areas.⁴ The erythematous tender patches spread and coalesce into a scarlatiniform erythema. Fragile bullae become large sheets of epidermis that slough (a positive Nikolsky’s sign).⁵ The desquamated areas can exhibit a scalded appearance.³

Differential diagnosis includes TEN and SJS

There is a broad differential for vesiculobullous rashes, ranging from self-limiting conditions to those that are life threatening.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), and erythema multiforme major (EMM) are immunological reactions to certain drugs or infections varying in the severity of their presentation. EMM, SJS, and TEN involve the mucosal surfaces, while SSSS does not. The histopathology of these conditions also differs from SSSS as they have keratinocyte necrosis of varying levels of the skin, whereas SSSS only involves the epidermis.

SSSS also may be confused with drug reactions, such as DRESS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) syndrome. DRESS typically is associated with anticonvulsants and sulfonamides and may have peripheral eosinophilia and a transaminitis.⁴

Continue to: Other more self-limited vesiculobullous rashes...

Other more self-limited vesiculobullous rashes include human enteroviruses such as coxsackie virus (hand-foot-mouth disease), echovirus, and enterovirus. However, unlike SSSS, which only affects the epidermis, these disorders may produce epidermal necrosis resulting in epidermal-dermal separation and mucocutaneous blistering.⁴

Making the diagnosis

When a patient has classic SSSS, the diagnosis can be made based on exam findings and the patient’s history. Families will usually report a generalized rash in neonates with desquamation of the entire skin. Fever is often present. Recent exposures to other family members with skin and soft-tissue infections is a possibility. If there is doubt, a skin biopsy can be obtained for histology. Lab work may reveal an elevated white blood cell count; blood culture is often negative.

The primary site of S aureus infection is usually the nasopharynx, causing a mild upper respiratory tract infection; therefore, nasopharyngeal cultures may be positive.⁴ Cultures can also be drawn from blood, wounds, nares, and ocular exudates if there is suspicion. Cultures from the actual blisters are typically negative, as the toxin—not the actual bacteria—is responsible for the blistering. Unlike adults who experience SSSS, children typically have negative blood cultures.⁴

Prompt treatment is essential

Swift diagnosis and management of SSSS is important due to the risk of severe disease. It is important to start antibiotics early because methicillin-sensitive S aureus is a predominant cause of SSSS.² The epidemiology of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) continues to shift. A recent study suggests that empiric therapy with penicillinase-resistant penicillins, along with clindamycin, be employed until culture sensitivities are available to guide therapy.² Local resistance patterns to S aureus should help guide initial empiric antibiotic treatment. Patients should receive intravenous (IV) fluids to compensate for insensible fluid losses similar to an extensive burn wound. Wound dressings placed over sloughed skin can help prevent secondary infection.² Lastly, the use of anti-inflammatory drugs and opiates often depends upon the extent of pain the patient experiences.

Our patient was immediately started on IV clindamycin 10 mg/kg tid and IV fluids. She was given morphine 0.01 mg/kg for pain control. As expected, cultures of her nasopharynx, blood, and vulva did not grow S aureus. Although no organism was isolated, her rash rapidly improved, and she was discharged home to complete a 10-day oral course of clindamycin 10 mg/kg tid.

CORRESPONDENCE
Nicholas M. Potisek, MD, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157; [email protected]

A 3-year-old girl presented with a rapidly progressing rash. The rash began the previous day with redness around her lips and nose (FIGURE 1). Twelve hours later, the rash had progressed to involve her neck, trunk, and inguinal area (FIGURE 2). The child’s parents reported that she had no recent illnesses or treatment with antibiotics.

On physical examination, she was febrile (101.8° F) and irritable throughout the encounter. She had perioral and nasolabial erythema and dryness. Her lips were dry with no intraoral mucosal lesions, and her conjunctiva was clear. She had a tender erythrodermal rash that was most prominent on her neck folds, back, and inguinal folds. Superficial layers of skin sloughed off when pressure was applied to areas along her back.

WHAT IS YOUR DIAGNOSIS?
HOW WOULD YOU TREAT THIS PATIENT?

Based on the patient’s classic presentation and exam findings, the physician suspected staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome. SSSS is a rare but serious condition that progresses quickly with high fevers and diffuse painful erythema. The exact epidemiology of SSSS is unclear; some articles report incidences between 0.09 and 0.13 cases per 1 million people.¹ The mortality rate is about 5% due to complications of sepsis, superinfection, and electrolyte disturbances.²

SSSS is caused by Staphylococcus aureus from a localized source that produces exfoliative toxins A and B that spread hematogenously, causing extensive epidermal damage. Exotoxins bind to desmosomes, causing skin cells to lose adherence.³ Histopathology shows intraepidermal cleavage through the stratum granulosum.

Infants and younger children appear more likely to be affected by SSSS, although it may occur in older children or adults who are immunocompromised. It may be that younger children are most susceptible due to a lack of antibodies to the toxin produced or because of a delayed clearance of the toxin-antibody complex from an immature renal system.

Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome progresses quickly, with high fevers and diffuse, painful erythema.

What you’ll see. Patients with SSSS may have a prodrome of irritability, malaise, and fever. The rash is first noticeable as erythema in the flexural areas.⁴ The erythematous tender patches spread and coalesce into a scarlatiniform erythema. Fragile bullae become large sheets of epidermis that slough (a positive Nikolsky’s sign).⁵ The desquamated areas can exhibit a scalded appearance.³

Differential diagnosis includes TEN and SJS

There is a broad differential for vesiculobullous rashes, ranging from self-limiting conditions to those that are life threatening.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), and erythema multiforme major (EMM) are immunological reactions to certain drugs or infections varying in the severity of their presentation. EMM, SJS, and TEN involve the mucosal surfaces, while SSSS does not. The histopathology of these conditions also differs from SSSS as they have keratinocyte necrosis of varying levels of the skin, whereas SSSS only involves the epidermis.

SSSS also may be confused with drug reactions, such as DRESS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) syndrome. DRESS typically is associated with anticonvulsants and sulfonamides and may have peripheral eosinophilia and a transaminitis.⁴

Continue to: Other more self-limited vesiculobullous rashes...

Other more self-limited vesiculobullous rashes include human enteroviruses such as coxsackie virus (hand-foot-mouth disease), echovirus, and enterovirus. However, unlike SSSS, which only affects the epidermis, these disorders may produce epidermal necrosis resulting in epidermal-dermal separation and mucocutaneous blistering.⁴

Making the diagnosis

When a patient has classic SSSS, the diagnosis can be made based on exam findings and the patient’s history. Families will usually report a generalized rash in neonates with desquamation of the entire skin. Fever is often present. Recent exposures to other family members with skin and soft-tissue infections is a possibility. If there is doubt, a skin biopsy can be obtained for histology. Lab work may reveal an elevated white blood cell count; blood culture is often negative.

The primary site of S aureus infection is usually the nasopharynx, causing a mild upper respiratory tract infection; therefore, nasopharyngeal cultures may be positive.⁴ Cultures can also be drawn from blood, wounds, nares, and ocular exudates if there is suspicion. Cultures from the actual blisters are typically negative, as the toxin—not the actual bacteria—is responsible for the blistering. Unlike adults who experience SSSS, children typically have negative blood cultures.⁴

Prompt treatment is essential

Swift diagnosis and management of SSSS is important due to the risk of severe disease. It is important to start antibiotics early because methicillin-sensitive S aureus is a predominant cause of SSSS.² The epidemiology of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) continues to shift. A recent study suggests that empiric therapy with penicillinase-resistant penicillins, along with clindamycin, be employed until culture sensitivities are available to guide therapy.² Local resistance patterns to S aureus should help guide initial empiric antibiotic treatment. Patients should receive intravenous (IV) fluids to compensate for insensible fluid losses similar to an extensive burn wound. Wound dressings placed over sloughed skin can help prevent secondary infection.² Lastly, the use of anti-inflammatory drugs and opiates often depends upon the extent of pain the patient experiences.

Our patient was immediately started on IV clindamycin 10 mg/kg tid and IV fluids. She was given morphine 0.01 mg/kg for pain control. As expected, cultures of her nasopharynx, blood, and vulva did not grow S aureus. Although no organism was isolated, her rash rapidly improved, and she was discharged home to complete a 10-day oral course of clindamycin 10 mg/kg tid.

CORRESPONDENCE
Nicholas M. Potisek, MD, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157; [email protected]

THE CASE

A 56-year-old woman with a history of melanoma in situ presented with progressive dyspnea on exertion, cough productive of clear sputum, and right-sided rib pain radiating to the upper back of 5 weeks’ duration.

Twenty-four years earlier, the patient had undergone excision of a skin lesion from the right side of her back. Pathology revealed melanoma in situ with no evidence of invasion of the underlying dermis. Because of close margins, she underwent wider excision 2 weeks later and no residual tumor was found. The patient subsequently underwent routine biannual dermatologic follow-up and transitioned (within the past few years) to annual dermatologic follow-up. At a recent dermatologic visit (9 months earlier), there were no suspicious skin lesions.

At current presentation, she denied fever, chills, night sweats, or unintentional weight loss. On examination, her vital signs were normal. Her pulse oximetry on room air was 95% at rest and 94% with ambulation. She had decreased breath sounds at the right lung base and a fixed 2 × 2-cm nontender, indurated mass in the right upper anterior chest wall, superior to the right breast. A skin examination was not performed at this time.

A complete blood count revealed a white blood cell count of 8220/mcL (reference range, 4500–11,000/mcL), hemoglobin of 13.6 g/dL (reference range, 14–17.5 g/dL), and a platelet count of 162 × 103/mcL (reference range, 150–350 × 103/mcL). The patient’s electrolytes were within normal limits, with a creatinine level of 0.67 mg/dL (reference range, 0.1–1.2 mg/dL) and a calcium level of 9.4 mg/dL (reference range, 8.2–10.2 mg/dL). Lactate dehydrogenase was elevated at 308 U/L (reference range, 100–200 U/L).

A chest radiograph revealed a right upper lobe mass, right lower lobe consolidation, and a large right-sided pleural effusion (FIGURE 1). Chest computed tomography (CT) with intravenous contrast revealed a 5.2 × 5.7–cm right pleural-based mass with extension to the anterior chest wall, 3 left-sided pulmonary nodules, numerous right-sided pleural-based nodules (FIGURE 2), and multiple low-density liver lesions. An abdominal and pelvic CT scan revealed a 5.6 × 2.5 × 4.8–cm hepatic lesion (FIGURE 3) with scattered hepatic cysts.

THE DIAGNOSIS

A diagnostic thoracentesis was performed, and pleural fluid cytology results revealed metastatic melanoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed no evidence of metastases.

After the patient’s initial presentation, her dermatologist performed a biopsy on a pre-existing skin lesion on the patient’s left abdomen, which initially was thought to be a cherry angioma. This left abdominal skin lesion was in a location different from her previous melanoma in situ, which was located on the right side of the back. Biopsy results of the presumed cherry angioma revealed a nodular malignant melanoma (which was partially removed), adjacent to a cherry angioma (which was completely excised).

Continue to: Two primary melanomas

Two primary melanomas. Our patient had 2 different primary melanomas: a melanoma in situ on the right back diagnosed 24 years prior to the current presentation and the more recently identified melanoma on the left abdomen with metastases to the lung and liver.

We referred the patient to Oncology and she was enrolled in a clinical study with ipilimumab and nivolumab, monoclonal antibodies directed against negative regulators of T-cell activation.

DISCUSSION

In the United States, melanoma is the fifth leading cancer in men and the sixth leading cancer in women.¹ A prior history of melanoma or melanoma in situ increases the risk for a second melanoma,^2-4 and the risk remains elevated for more than 20 years after the initial diagnosis.² One- and 2-year survival rates for metastatic melanoma are 32% to 65% and 18% to 40%, respectively⁵; the 5-year survival rate of metastatic melanoma to the lung is approximately 16%.⁶

Recommendations regarding the appropriate follow-up of patients with a history of melanoma in situ and melanoma vary widely.⁷ For patients with a history of melanoma in situ, the American Academy of Dermatology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend annual skin examination indefinitely and self-examination of the skin and lymph nodes monthly.^4,7,8

Novel therapies are powerful allies in fight against melanoma

Previous standard treatment of metastatic melanoma included surgery, radiation, and cytotoxic chemotherapy. Resection rarely is curative in distant metastatic melanoma, and cytotoxic chemotherapy has low response rates, has a response duration of 4 to 6 months, and does not improve overall survival in advanced melanoma.^9-12

Continue to: Novel therapies...

Patients with a prior melanoma in situ or invasive melanoma have a higher risk for a subsequent invasive melanoma and require indefinite annual dermatologic follow-up.

Novel therapies, such as immunotherapy and molecular-targeted therapies, are dramatically increasing survival rates in metastatic melanoma. Melanoma frequently is associated with somatic mutations, and each patient may have a unique collection of mutations resulting in the expression of antigens that bind to certain T-cell receptors, which serve as targets for inhibitor immunotherapy.

Ipilimumab and nivolumab are monoclonal antibodies directed against negative regulators of T-cell activation. When ipilimumab and nivolumab bind to their receptors, feedback inhibition is prevented, which results in an immune response against the tumor. In a trial of 53 patients with advanced melanoma treated with both drugs, the overall survival rate at 1 and 2 years was 94% and 88%, respectively.¹³

Dabrafenib and trametinib. Mutations that activate the serine/threonine kinase gene, BRAF, are present in approximately 40% to 60% of advanced melanomas and lead to clonal expansion and tumor progression.^14,15 Inhibition of BRAF produces rapid tumor regression—even in extensive disease. Treatment with dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, and trametinib, a mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor, has been shown to be superior to a BRAF inhibitor alone and is associated with a survival rate of 72% at 1 year.¹⁶

Our patient. Seven months after enrolling in the clinical trial with ipilimumab and nivolumab, our patient developed brain metastases and was withdrawn from the trial. A resection of her brain metastases and radiation therapy followed. The patient was then started on molecular-targeted therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib. Twelve weeks later, a repeat CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis demonstrated an interval decrease in the size of the majority of the metastatic lesions, and a repeat brain MRI showed no additional metastases.

More than 4 years after her diagnosis, our patient remains on dabrafenib and trametinib therapy and her metastatic lesions to the lung and liver remain stable.

Continue to: THE TAKEAWAY

Patients with a prior melanoma in situ or invasive melanoma have a higher risk for a subsequent invasive melanoma, and this risk remains elevated for more than 20 years. While patients with a history of melanoma in situ do not require specific oncologic follow-up, they do require annual dermatologic follow-up indefinitely and should perform monthly self-examination of their skin and lymph nodes.

Heightened awareness of the risk for a second primary melanoma should prompt primary care physicians to conduct ongoing patient surveillance. Family physicians should also keep in mind that novel therapies for metastatic melanoma, such as molecular-targeted therapies and immunotherapy, are associated with a much higher survival rate than previous standard therapy.

CORRESPONDENCE
Iris Tong, MD, Associate Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 146 W River St, Providence, RI 02904; [email protected]

THE CASE

A 56-year-old woman with a history of melanoma in situ presented with progressive dyspnea on exertion, cough productive of clear sputum, and right-sided rib pain radiating to the upper back of 5 weeks’ duration.

Twenty-four years earlier, the patient had undergone excision of a skin lesion from the right side of her back. Pathology revealed melanoma in situ with no evidence of invasion of the underlying dermis. Because of close margins, she underwent wider excision 2 weeks later and no residual tumor was found. The patient subsequently underwent routine biannual dermatologic follow-up and transitioned (within the past few years) to annual dermatologic follow-up. At a recent dermatologic visit (9 months earlier), there were no suspicious skin lesions.

At current presentation, she denied fever, chills, night sweats, or unintentional weight loss. On examination, her vital signs were normal. Her pulse oximetry on room air was 95% at rest and 94% with ambulation. She had decreased breath sounds at the right lung base and a fixed 2 × 2-cm nontender, indurated mass in the right upper anterior chest wall, superior to the right breast. A skin examination was not performed at this time.

A complete blood count revealed a white blood cell count of 8220/mcL (reference range, 4500–11,000/mcL), hemoglobin of 13.6 g/dL (reference range, 14–17.5 g/dL), and a platelet count of 162 × 103/mcL (reference range, 150–350 × 103/mcL). The patient’s electrolytes were within normal limits, with a creatinine level of 0.67 mg/dL (reference range, 0.1–1.2 mg/dL) and a calcium level of 9.4 mg/dL (reference range, 8.2–10.2 mg/dL). Lactate dehydrogenase was elevated at 308 U/L (reference range, 100–200 U/L).

A chest radiograph revealed a right upper lobe mass, right lower lobe consolidation, and a large right-sided pleural effusion (FIGURE 1). Chest computed tomography (CT) with intravenous contrast revealed a 5.2 × 5.7–cm right pleural-based mass with extension to the anterior chest wall, 3 left-sided pulmonary nodules, numerous right-sided pleural-based nodules (FIGURE 2), and multiple low-density liver lesions. An abdominal and pelvic CT scan revealed a 5.6 × 2.5 × 4.8–cm hepatic lesion (FIGURE 3) with scattered hepatic cysts.

THE DIAGNOSIS

A diagnostic thoracentesis was performed, and pleural fluid cytology results revealed metastatic melanoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed no evidence of metastases.

After the patient’s initial presentation, her dermatologist performed a biopsy on a pre-existing skin lesion on the patient’s left abdomen, which initially was thought to be a cherry angioma. This left abdominal skin lesion was in a location different from her previous melanoma in situ, which was located on the right side of the back. Biopsy results of the presumed cherry angioma revealed a nodular malignant melanoma (which was partially removed), adjacent to a cherry angioma (which was completely excised).

Continue to: Two primary melanomas

Two primary melanomas. Our patient had 2 different primary melanomas: a melanoma in situ on the right back diagnosed 24 years prior to the current presentation and the more recently identified melanoma on the left abdomen with metastases to the lung and liver.

We referred the patient to Oncology and she was enrolled in a clinical study with ipilimumab and nivolumab, monoclonal antibodies directed against negative regulators of T-cell activation.

DISCUSSION

In the United States, melanoma is the fifth leading cancer in men and the sixth leading cancer in women.¹ A prior history of melanoma or melanoma in situ increases the risk for a second melanoma,^2-4 and the risk remains elevated for more than 20 years after the initial diagnosis.² One- and 2-year survival rates for metastatic melanoma are 32% to 65% and 18% to 40%, respectively⁵; the 5-year survival rate of metastatic melanoma to the lung is approximately 16%.⁶

Recommendations regarding the appropriate follow-up of patients with a history of melanoma in situ and melanoma vary widely.⁷ For patients with a history of melanoma in situ, the American Academy of Dermatology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend annual skin examination indefinitely and self-examination of the skin and lymph nodes monthly.^4,7,8

Novel therapies are powerful allies in fight against melanoma

Previous standard treatment of metastatic melanoma included surgery, radiation, and cytotoxic chemotherapy. Resection rarely is curative in distant metastatic melanoma, and cytotoxic chemotherapy has low response rates, has a response duration of 4 to 6 months, and does not improve overall survival in advanced melanoma.^9-12

Continue to: Novel therapies...

Patients with a prior melanoma in situ or invasive melanoma have a higher risk for a subsequent invasive melanoma and require indefinite annual dermatologic follow-up.

Novel therapies, such as immunotherapy and molecular-targeted therapies, are dramatically increasing survival rates in metastatic melanoma. Melanoma frequently is associated with somatic mutations, and each patient may have a unique collection of mutations resulting in the expression of antigens that bind to certain T-cell receptors, which serve as targets for inhibitor immunotherapy.

Ipilimumab and nivolumab are monoclonal antibodies directed against negative regulators of T-cell activation. When ipilimumab and nivolumab bind to their receptors, feedback inhibition is prevented, which results in an immune response against the tumor. In a trial of 53 patients with advanced melanoma treated with both drugs, the overall survival rate at 1 and 2 years was 94% and 88%, respectively.¹³

Dabrafenib and trametinib. Mutations that activate the serine/threonine kinase gene, BRAF, are present in approximately 40% to 60% of advanced melanomas and lead to clonal expansion and tumor progression.^14,15 Inhibition of BRAF produces rapid tumor regression—even in extensive disease. Treatment with dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, and trametinib, a mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor, has been shown to be superior to a BRAF inhibitor alone and is associated with a survival rate of 72% at 1 year.¹⁶

Our patient. Seven months after enrolling in the clinical trial with ipilimumab and nivolumab, our patient developed brain metastases and was withdrawn from the trial. A resection of her brain metastases and radiation therapy followed. The patient was then started on molecular-targeted therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib. Twelve weeks later, a repeat CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis demonstrated an interval decrease in the size of the majority of the metastatic lesions, and a repeat brain MRI showed no additional metastases.

More than 4 years after her diagnosis, our patient remains on dabrafenib and trametinib therapy and her metastatic lesions to the lung and liver remain stable.

Continue to: THE TAKEAWAY

Patients with a prior melanoma in situ or invasive melanoma have a higher risk for a subsequent invasive melanoma, and this risk remains elevated for more than 20 years. While patients with a history of melanoma in situ do not require specific oncologic follow-up, they do require annual dermatologic follow-up indefinitely and should perform monthly self-examination of their skin and lymph nodes.

Heightened awareness of the risk for a second primary melanoma should prompt primary care physicians to conduct ongoing patient surveillance. Family physicians should also keep in mind that novel therapies for metastatic melanoma, such as molecular-targeted therapies and immunotherapy, are associated with a much higher survival rate than previous standard therapy.

CORRESPONDENCE
Iris Tong, MD, Associate Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 146 W River St, Providence, RI 02904; [email protected]

THE CASE

A 56-year-old woman with a history of melanoma in situ presented with progressive dyspnea on exertion, cough productive of clear sputum, and right-sided rib pain radiating to the upper back of 5 weeks’ duration.

Twenty-four years earlier, the patient had undergone excision of a skin lesion from the right side of her back. Pathology revealed melanoma in situ with no evidence of invasion of the underlying dermis. Because of close margins, she underwent wider excision 2 weeks later and no residual tumor was found. The patient subsequently underwent routine biannual dermatologic follow-up and transitioned (within the past few years) to annual dermatologic follow-up. At a recent dermatologic visit (9 months earlier), there were no suspicious skin lesions.

At current presentation, she denied fever, chills, night sweats, or unintentional weight loss. On examination, her vital signs were normal. Her pulse oximetry on room air was 95% at rest and 94% with ambulation. She had decreased breath sounds at the right lung base and a fixed 2 × 2-cm nontender, indurated mass in the right upper anterior chest wall, superior to the right breast. A skin examination was not performed at this time.

A complete blood count revealed a white blood cell count of 8220/mcL (reference range, 4500–11,000/mcL), hemoglobin of 13.6 g/dL (reference range, 14–17.5 g/dL), and a platelet count of 162 × 103/mcL (reference range, 150–350 × 103/mcL). The patient’s electrolytes were within normal limits, with a creatinine level of 0.67 mg/dL (reference range, 0.1–1.2 mg/dL) and a calcium level of 9.4 mg/dL (reference range, 8.2–10.2 mg/dL). Lactate dehydrogenase was elevated at 308 U/L (reference range, 100–200 U/L).

A chest radiograph revealed a right upper lobe mass, right lower lobe consolidation, and a large right-sided pleural effusion (FIGURE 1). Chest computed tomography (CT) with intravenous contrast revealed a 5.2 × 5.7–cm right pleural-based mass with extension to the anterior chest wall, 3 left-sided pulmonary nodules, numerous right-sided pleural-based nodules (FIGURE 2), and multiple low-density liver lesions. An abdominal and pelvic CT scan revealed a 5.6 × 2.5 × 4.8–cm hepatic lesion (FIGURE 3) with scattered hepatic cysts.

THE DIAGNOSIS

A diagnostic thoracentesis was performed, and pleural fluid cytology results revealed metastatic melanoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed no evidence of metastases.

After the patient’s initial presentation, her dermatologist performed a biopsy on a pre-existing skin lesion on the patient’s left abdomen, which initially was thought to be a cherry angioma. This left abdominal skin lesion was in a location different from her previous melanoma in situ, which was located on the right side of the back. Biopsy results of the presumed cherry angioma revealed a nodular malignant melanoma (which was partially removed), adjacent to a cherry angioma (which was completely excised).

Continue to: Two primary melanomas

Two primary melanomas. Our patient had 2 different primary melanomas: a melanoma in situ on the right back diagnosed 24 years prior to the current presentation and the more recently identified melanoma on the left abdomen with metastases to the lung and liver.

We referred the patient to Oncology and she was enrolled in a clinical study with ipilimumab and nivolumab, monoclonal antibodies directed against negative regulators of T-cell activation.

DISCUSSION

In the United States, melanoma is the fifth leading cancer in men and the sixth leading cancer in women.¹ A prior history of melanoma or melanoma in situ increases the risk for a second melanoma,^2-4 and the risk remains elevated for more than 20 years after the initial diagnosis.² One- and 2-year survival rates for metastatic melanoma are 32% to 65% and 18% to 40%, respectively⁵; the 5-year survival rate of metastatic melanoma to the lung is approximately 16%.⁶

Recommendations regarding the appropriate follow-up of patients with a history of melanoma in situ and melanoma vary widely.⁷ For patients with a history of melanoma in situ, the American Academy of Dermatology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend annual skin examination indefinitely and self-examination of the skin and lymph nodes monthly.^4,7,8

Novel therapies are powerful allies in fight against melanoma

Previous standard treatment of metastatic melanoma included surgery, radiation, and cytotoxic chemotherapy. Resection rarely is curative in distant metastatic melanoma, and cytotoxic chemotherapy has low response rates, has a response duration of 4 to 6 months, and does not improve overall survival in advanced melanoma.^9-12

Continue to: Novel therapies...

Patients with a prior melanoma in situ or invasive melanoma have a higher risk for a subsequent invasive melanoma and require indefinite annual dermatologic follow-up.

Novel therapies, such as immunotherapy and molecular-targeted therapies, are dramatically increasing survival rates in metastatic melanoma. Melanoma frequently is associated with somatic mutations, and each patient may have a unique collection of mutations resulting in the expression of antigens that bind to certain T-cell receptors, which serve as targets for inhibitor immunotherapy.

Ipilimumab and nivolumab are monoclonal antibodies directed against negative regulators of T-cell activation. When ipilimumab and nivolumab bind to their receptors, feedback inhibition is prevented, which results in an immune response against the tumor. In a trial of 53 patients with advanced melanoma treated with both drugs, the overall survival rate at 1 and 2 years was 94% and 88%, respectively.¹³

Dabrafenib and trametinib. Mutations that activate the serine/threonine kinase gene, BRAF, are present in approximately 40% to 60% of advanced melanomas and lead to clonal expansion and tumor progression.^14,15 Inhibition of BRAF produces rapid tumor regression—even in extensive disease. Treatment with dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, and trametinib, a mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor, has been shown to be superior to a BRAF inhibitor alone and is associated with a survival rate of 72% at 1 year.¹⁶

Our patient. Seven months after enrolling in the clinical trial with ipilimumab and nivolumab, our patient developed brain metastases and was withdrawn from the trial. A resection of her brain metastases and radiation therapy followed. The patient was then started on molecular-targeted therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib. Twelve weeks later, a repeat CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis demonstrated an interval decrease in the size of the majority of the metastatic lesions, and a repeat brain MRI showed no additional metastases.

More than 4 years after her diagnosis, our patient remains on dabrafenib and trametinib therapy and her metastatic lesions to the lung and liver remain stable.

Continue to: THE TAKEAWAY

Patients with a prior melanoma in situ or invasive melanoma have a higher risk for a subsequent invasive melanoma, and this risk remains elevated for more than 20 years. While patients with a history of melanoma in situ do not require specific oncologic follow-up, they do require annual dermatologic follow-up indefinitely and should perform monthly self-examination of their skin and lymph nodes.

Heightened awareness of the risk for a second primary melanoma should prompt primary care physicians to conduct ongoing patient surveillance. Family physicians should also keep in mind that novel therapies for metastatic melanoma, such as molecular-targeted therapies and immunotherapy, are associated with a much higher survival rate than previous standard therapy.

CORRESPONDENCE
Iris Tong, MD, Associate Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 146 W River St, Providence, RI 02904; [email protected]

A 59-year-old woman presented to a dermatology clinic with an asymptomatic brown facial hyperpigmentation that had developed several years earlier, and had persisted, despite regular face washing. Physicians who previously treated this patient interpreted this as melasma and advised her to wear sunscreen. The condition was not aggravated by sun exposure. The patient reported that she was otherwise healthy.

Physical examination revealed a brown discoloration with a slightly rough texture. Upon rubbing the affected area with a 70% isopropyl alcohol pad, normal skin was revealed (FIGURE 1A) and brown flakes were apparent on the gauze (FIGURE 1B). 

WHAT IS YOUR DIAGNOSIS?
HOW WOULD YOU TREAT THIS PATIENT?

The physician diagnosed terra firma-forme dermatosis (TFFD) in this patient, noting the “dirty brown coloration” and distribution that did not suggest post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation or melasma. TFFD is a rare and benign form of acquired hyperpigmentation characterized by “velvety, pigmented patches or plaques.”¹ A simple bedside test, known as an “alcohol wipe test,” both confirms and treats TFFD; it involves rubbing the affected area with a 70% isopropyl alcohol pad.¹

TFFD is not a consequence of poor hygiene, but may be a result of “sticky” sebum that produces a buildup of keratin debris, sebum, and bacteria.

TFFD typically affects the face, neck, trunk, or ankles, but the scalp, axilla, back, and pubis also can be affected.¹ Histopathology will show negligible amounts of dermal inflammation, hyperkeratosis with mild acanthosis, and hyperkeratosis and papillomatosis.¹ Most patients diagnosed with TFFD report that the hyperpigmentation does not improve despite washing with soap and water.²

Hygiene is not a factor

In 2015, Greywal and Cohen followed the case presentations of 10 Caucasian patients with TFFD who presented with “brown and/or black plaques or papules or both.”² Many of the individuals followed in this case series reported “[practicing] good hygiene and showered a minimum of every other day or daily.”² The same was reported by the patient in this case. This suggests that TFFD is not a consequence of poor hygiene but perhaps a result of “sticky” sebum that produces a buildup of keratin debris, sebum, and bacteria on the skin.³ This produces the hyperpigmentation seen clinically.

Differential includes post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation

Several other hyperpigmentation disorders were considered on the initial differential diagnosis for this case, including melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. However, these 2 conditions are macular, whereas this hyperpigmented condition had a rough, mildly papular texture. Additionally, melasma flares up in the summer with UV exposure, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation presents with pruritus and/or a pre-existing rash.⁴ This patient reported that the condition did not itch nor change with increased sunlight, thus making melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation unlikely diagnoses.

Acanthosis nigricans also was considered because it presents with a velvety brown pigmentation similar to what was seen with this patient. Acanthosis nigricans, however, primarily affects flexural areas, not the face, making it improbable.

Continue to: Our patient

Our patient. A “wipe test” was performed on the patient. This removed the brown flaky scaling and revealed the underlying normal skin. We instructed the patient to wash daily with a soapy wash cloth and scrub with 70% isopropyl alcohol should the hyperpigmentation recur. The patient did not return.

CORRESPONDENCE
Robert T. Brodell, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216; [email protected]

A 59-year-old woman presented to a dermatology clinic with an asymptomatic brown facial hyperpigmentation that had developed several years earlier, and had persisted, despite regular face washing. Physicians who previously treated this patient interpreted this as melasma and advised her to wear sunscreen. The condition was not aggravated by sun exposure. The patient reported that she was otherwise healthy.

Physical examination revealed a brown discoloration with a slightly rough texture. Upon rubbing the affected area with a 70% isopropyl alcohol pad, normal skin was revealed (FIGURE 1A) and brown flakes were apparent on the gauze (FIGURE 1B). 

WHAT IS YOUR DIAGNOSIS?
HOW WOULD YOU TREAT THIS PATIENT?

The physician diagnosed terra firma-forme dermatosis (TFFD) in this patient, noting the “dirty brown coloration” and distribution that did not suggest post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation or melasma. TFFD is a rare and benign form of acquired hyperpigmentation characterized by “velvety, pigmented patches or plaques.”¹ A simple bedside test, known as an “alcohol wipe test,” both confirms and treats TFFD; it involves rubbing the affected area with a 70% isopropyl alcohol pad.¹

TFFD is not a consequence of poor hygiene, but may be a result of “sticky” sebum that produces a buildup of keratin debris, sebum, and bacteria.

TFFD typically affects the face, neck, trunk, or ankles, but the scalp, axilla, back, and pubis also can be affected.¹ Histopathology will show negligible amounts of dermal inflammation, hyperkeratosis with mild acanthosis, and hyperkeratosis and papillomatosis.¹ Most patients diagnosed with TFFD report that the hyperpigmentation does not improve despite washing with soap and water.²

Hygiene is not a factor

In 2015, Greywal and Cohen followed the case presentations of 10 Caucasian patients with TFFD who presented with “brown and/or black plaques or papules or both.”² Many of the individuals followed in this case series reported “[practicing] good hygiene and showered a minimum of every other day or daily.”² The same was reported by the patient in this case. This suggests that TFFD is not a consequence of poor hygiene but perhaps a result of “sticky” sebum that produces a buildup of keratin debris, sebum, and bacteria on the skin.³ This produces the hyperpigmentation seen clinically.

Differential includes post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation

Several other hyperpigmentation disorders were considered on the initial differential diagnosis for this case, including melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. However, these 2 conditions are macular, whereas this hyperpigmented condition had a rough, mildly papular texture. Additionally, melasma flares up in the summer with UV exposure, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation presents with pruritus and/or a pre-existing rash.⁴ This patient reported that the condition did not itch nor change with increased sunlight, thus making melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation unlikely diagnoses.

Acanthosis nigricans also was considered because it presents with a velvety brown pigmentation similar to what was seen with this patient. Acanthosis nigricans, however, primarily affects flexural areas, not the face, making it improbable.

Continue to: Our patient

Our patient. A “wipe test” was performed on the patient. This removed the brown flaky scaling and revealed the underlying normal skin. We instructed the patient to wash daily with a soapy wash cloth and scrub with 70% isopropyl alcohol should the hyperpigmentation recur. The patient did not return.

CORRESPONDENCE
Robert T. Brodell, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216; [email protected]

A 59-year-old woman presented to a dermatology clinic with an asymptomatic brown facial hyperpigmentation that had developed several years earlier, and had persisted, despite regular face washing. Physicians who previously treated this patient interpreted this as melasma and advised her to wear sunscreen. The condition was not aggravated by sun exposure. The patient reported that she was otherwise healthy.

Physical examination revealed a brown discoloration with a slightly rough texture. Upon rubbing the affected area with a 70% isopropyl alcohol pad, normal skin was revealed (FIGURE 1A) and brown flakes were apparent on the gauze (FIGURE 1B). 

WHAT IS YOUR DIAGNOSIS?
HOW WOULD YOU TREAT THIS PATIENT?

The physician diagnosed terra firma-forme dermatosis (TFFD) in this patient, noting the “dirty brown coloration” and distribution that did not suggest post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation or melasma. TFFD is a rare and benign form of acquired hyperpigmentation characterized by “velvety, pigmented patches or plaques.”¹ A simple bedside test, known as an “alcohol wipe test,” both confirms and treats TFFD; it involves rubbing the affected area with a 70% isopropyl alcohol pad.¹

TFFD is not a consequence of poor hygiene, but may be a result of “sticky” sebum that produces a buildup of keratin debris, sebum, and bacteria.

TFFD typically affects the face, neck, trunk, or ankles, but the scalp, axilla, back, and pubis also can be affected.¹ Histopathology will show negligible amounts of dermal inflammation, hyperkeratosis with mild acanthosis, and hyperkeratosis and papillomatosis.¹ Most patients diagnosed with TFFD report that the hyperpigmentation does not improve despite washing with soap and water.²

Hygiene is not a factor

In 2015, Greywal and Cohen followed the case presentations of 10 Caucasian patients with TFFD who presented with “brown and/or black plaques or papules or both.”² Many of the individuals followed in this case series reported “[practicing] good hygiene and showered a minimum of every other day or daily.”² The same was reported by the patient in this case. This suggests that TFFD is not a consequence of poor hygiene but perhaps a result of “sticky” sebum that produces a buildup of keratin debris, sebum, and bacteria on the skin.³ This produces the hyperpigmentation seen clinically.

Differential includes post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation

Several other hyperpigmentation disorders were considered on the initial differential diagnosis for this case, including melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. However, these 2 conditions are macular, whereas this hyperpigmented condition had a rough, mildly papular texture. Additionally, melasma flares up in the summer with UV exposure, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation presents with pruritus and/or a pre-existing rash.⁴ This patient reported that the condition did not itch nor change with increased sunlight, thus making melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation unlikely diagnoses.

Acanthosis nigricans also was considered because it presents with a velvety brown pigmentation similar to what was seen with this patient. Acanthosis nigricans, however, primarily affects flexural areas, not the face, making it improbable.

Continue to: Our patient

Our patient. A “wipe test” was performed on the patient. This removed the brown flaky scaling and revealed the underlying normal skin. We instructed the patient to wash daily with a soapy wash cloth and scrub with 70% isopropyl alcohol should the hyperpigmentation recur. The patient did not return.

CORRESPONDENCE
Robert T. Brodell, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216; [email protected]

PARIS – The more comorbid conditions present in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, the less likely they are to achieve complete clearance in response to biologic therapy, according to the results of the prospective observational PSO-BIO-REAL study.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“I think this reflects a picture that has been seen in other studies,” noted Mr. Ziegler, director of global patient access at Leo Pharma in Ballerup, Denmark.

The purpose of the 12-month PSO-BIO-REAL (PSOriasis treated with BIOlogics in REAL life) study was to assess the effectiveness of a variety of biologic agents in a real-world population typical of patients encountered in routine clinical practice, as opposed to more restrictive format of often-cited randomized trials, which generally feature a lengthy list of exclusions. One-third of participants were from the United States, with the rest drawn from four Western European countries. Their mean age was 47 years, with an 18.4-year history of psoriasis and a baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of 14.3.

Sixty percent of participants were starting treatment with a biologic agent for the first time. The other 40% had prior biologic experience. At physician discretion, 61% of enrollees were put on a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, either etanercept (Enbrel), adalimumab (Humira), or infliximab (Remicade); 30% initiated treatment with the interleukin-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab (Stelara); and 9% received secukinumab (Cosentyx), an interleukin-17 inhibitor.

The five most common comorbid conditions present at baseline were hypertension, present in 33.5% of participants; psoriatic arthritis (PsA), present in 28.1%; hyperlipidemia, 20.9%; diabetes, 13.9%, and depression, present in 13.7% of the psoriasis patients.

Baseline comorbidities were significantly more common among the biologic-experienced patients. For example, their prevalence of hypertension was 42%, compared with 28% in the biologic-naive group. PsA was present in 35% of the biologic-experienced and 23% of the biologic-naive patients. Nineteen percent of biologic-experienced patients had diabetes at baseline, as did 11% of the biologic-naive group.

During the 12-month study, 3.7% of patients developed a new comorbidity, the most common being anxiety, hypertension, PsA, depression, and hyperlipidemia.

The primary outcome in the study was the complete clearance rate – a PASI 100 response – at 6 months. It ranged from a high of 31% in patients with no baseline comorbid conditions to a low of 16.5% in those with three or more. The results were similar at 12 months.

Conversely, an inadequate therapeutic response as defined by a PASI 50 or less at 6 months occurred in 15% of psoriasis patients with no baseline comorbidities, 27% with one, 35% with two comorbid conditions, and 28% with three or more.

The major caveat regarding this study is that the observed association between comorbid conditions and complete clearance rates doesn’t prove causality, Mr. Ziegler noted.

The PSO-BIO-REAL study was sponsored by Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Leo Pharma. Mr. Ziegler is a Leo executive.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Ziegler F. EADV Congress, Abstract FC04.01.

PARIS – The more comorbid conditions present in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, the less likely they are to achieve complete clearance in response to biologic therapy, according to the results of the prospective observational PSO-BIO-REAL study.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“I think this reflects a picture that has been seen in other studies,” noted Mr. Ziegler, director of global patient access at Leo Pharma in Ballerup, Denmark.

The purpose of the 12-month PSO-BIO-REAL (PSOriasis treated with BIOlogics in REAL life) study was to assess the effectiveness of a variety of biologic agents in a real-world population typical of patients encountered in routine clinical practice, as opposed to more restrictive format of often-cited randomized trials, which generally feature a lengthy list of exclusions. One-third of participants were from the United States, with the rest drawn from four Western European countries. Their mean age was 47 years, with an 18.4-year history of psoriasis and a baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of 14.3.

Sixty percent of participants were starting treatment with a biologic agent for the first time. The other 40% had prior biologic experience. At physician discretion, 61% of enrollees were put on a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, either etanercept (Enbrel), adalimumab (Humira), or infliximab (Remicade); 30% initiated treatment with the interleukin-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab (Stelara); and 9% received secukinumab (Cosentyx), an interleukin-17 inhibitor.

The five most common comorbid conditions present at baseline were hypertension, present in 33.5% of participants; psoriatic arthritis (PsA), present in 28.1%; hyperlipidemia, 20.9%; diabetes, 13.9%, and depression, present in 13.7% of the psoriasis patients.

Baseline comorbidities were significantly more common among the biologic-experienced patients. For example, their prevalence of hypertension was 42%, compared with 28% in the biologic-naive group. PsA was present in 35% of the biologic-experienced and 23% of the biologic-naive patients. Nineteen percent of biologic-experienced patients had diabetes at baseline, as did 11% of the biologic-naive group.

During the 12-month study, 3.7% of patients developed a new comorbidity, the most common being anxiety, hypertension, PsA, depression, and hyperlipidemia.

The primary outcome in the study was the complete clearance rate – a PASI 100 response – at 6 months. It ranged from a high of 31% in patients with no baseline comorbid conditions to a low of 16.5% in those with three or more. The results were similar at 12 months.

Conversely, an inadequate therapeutic response as defined by a PASI 50 or less at 6 months occurred in 15% of psoriasis patients with no baseline comorbidities, 27% with one, 35% with two comorbid conditions, and 28% with three or more.

The major caveat regarding this study is that the observed association between comorbid conditions and complete clearance rates doesn’t prove causality, Mr. Ziegler noted.

The PSO-BIO-REAL study was sponsored by Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Leo Pharma. Mr. Ziegler is a Leo executive.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Ziegler F. EADV Congress, Abstract FC04.01.

PARIS – The more comorbid conditions present in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, the less likely they are to achieve complete clearance in response to biologic therapy, according to the results of the prospective observational PSO-BIO-REAL study.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“I think this reflects a picture that has been seen in other studies,” noted Mr. Ziegler, director of global patient access at Leo Pharma in Ballerup, Denmark.

The purpose of the 12-month PSO-BIO-REAL (PSOriasis treated with BIOlogics in REAL life) study was to assess the effectiveness of a variety of biologic agents in a real-world population typical of patients encountered in routine clinical practice, as opposed to more restrictive format of often-cited randomized trials, which generally feature a lengthy list of exclusions. One-third of participants were from the United States, with the rest drawn from four Western European countries. Their mean age was 47 years, with an 18.4-year history of psoriasis and a baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of 14.3.

Sixty percent of participants were starting treatment with a biologic agent for the first time. The other 40% had prior biologic experience. At physician discretion, 61% of enrollees were put on a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, either etanercept (Enbrel), adalimumab (Humira), or infliximab (Remicade); 30% initiated treatment with the interleukin-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab (Stelara); and 9% received secukinumab (Cosentyx), an interleukin-17 inhibitor.

The five most common comorbid conditions present at baseline were hypertension, present in 33.5% of participants; psoriatic arthritis (PsA), present in 28.1%; hyperlipidemia, 20.9%; diabetes, 13.9%, and depression, present in 13.7% of the psoriasis patients.

Baseline comorbidities were significantly more common among the biologic-experienced patients. For example, their prevalence of hypertension was 42%, compared with 28% in the biologic-naive group. PsA was present in 35% of the biologic-experienced and 23% of the biologic-naive patients. Nineteen percent of biologic-experienced patients had diabetes at baseline, as did 11% of the biologic-naive group.

During the 12-month study, 3.7% of patients developed a new comorbidity, the most common being anxiety, hypertension, PsA, depression, and hyperlipidemia.

The primary outcome in the study was the complete clearance rate – a PASI 100 response – at 6 months. It ranged from a high of 31% in patients with no baseline comorbid conditions to a low of 16.5% in those with three or more. The results were similar at 12 months.

Conversely, an inadequate therapeutic response as defined by a PASI 50 or less at 6 months occurred in 15% of psoriasis patients with no baseline comorbidities, 27% with one, 35% with two comorbid conditions, and 28% with three or more.

The major caveat regarding this study is that the observed association between comorbid conditions and complete clearance rates doesn’t prove causality, Mr. Ziegler noted.

The PSO-BIO-REAL study was sponsored by Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Leo Pharma. Mr. Ziegler is a Leo executive.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Ziegler F. EADV Congress, Abstract FC04.01.

GRAND CAYMAN, CAYMAN ISLANDS – Isotretinoin, the go-to guy for severe acne, may not be so much a local cop as a community organizer, Kenneth B. Gordon, MD, said at the meeting provided by Global Academy for Medical Education.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

“It now appears that with isotretinoin treatment, the diversity of the skin microbiome, and the diversity of P. [Propionibacterium] acnes in particular, is increased, and that the microbial community is replenished with the types associated with healthy skin,” said Dr. Gordon, professor and chair of dermatology at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. When these new bacteria move in, they push pathogenic species out of the neighborhood “and create a new skin microbial community. Maybe this is the real reason our patients tend to stay better, once we get them better with isotretinoin.”

Dr. Gordon discussed new data published last October in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology (J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Oct 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.09.023). In a letter to the editor, William H. McCoy, IV, MD, PhD, of Washington University, St. Louis, and his associates suggest that isotretinoin induces a “sebaceous drought,” which shifts the skin microbiome from pathogenic to normophysiological.

Isotretinoin is the gold standard treatment for severe acne, but its method of action has never been fully elucidated, Dr. Gordon said. It clearly targets the sebaceous gland – decreasing sebocyte proliferation and suppressing sebum production – but an emerging body of research suggests that the drug also markedly affects dermal microbial colonization.

The entire concept of a skin microbiome is nearly as new as this new concept of isotretinoin’s effect upon it. Only in the last few years have researchers begun to characterize the complex microbial film that keeps skin healthy and resistant to infection. Dermal dysbiosis has now been associated with acne, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, and atopic dermatitis.

The 2-year pilot study compared the dermal microbiome of isotretinoin-treated acne patients with that of patients with untreated acne and normal skin. Skin samples underwent genomic analysis before isotretinoin treatment, at several periods during treatment, and about 5 months after treatment stopped. Untreated controls were evaluated at baseline and at 2, 5, and 10 months.

Not surprisingly, before treatment the microbiome was similar in both acne groups, but markedly different from that seen in normal skin. As isotretinoin’s “oil drought” dragged on, levels of Cutibacterium acnes (the new appellation for P. acnes) declined. Staphylococcus species initially increased, but then declined as well. Simultaneously, four new taxa (Rothia, Flavobacterium, Enterobacter, and Micrococcus) increased. Most patients had a restructuring of their Propionibacterium community, populated largely by the less-pathogenic strains found on normal skin.

“We suggest that isotretinoin creates a Propionibacterium ‘population bottleneck’ that selects for ‘healthy’ Propionibacterium communities and other sebaceous skin taxa that persist after treatment, resulting in long-term acne remission [i.e., normal skin],” the investigators wrote.

This is a new and very exciting finding, Dr. Gordon commented. “It appears that the reason our isotretinoin patients stay better once they get better is not from targeting the sebaceous gland itself, but by repairing the skin’s microbiome and getting it back to normal.”

Dr. Gordon reported financial relationships with numerous pharmaceutical companies. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.

[email protected]

This article was updated 2/1/19.

GRAND CAYMAN, CAYMAN ISLANDS – Isotretinoin, the go-to guy for severe acne, may not be so much a local cop as a community organizer, Kenneth B. Gordon, MD, said at the meeting provided by Global Academy for Medical Education.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

“It now appears that with isotretinoin treatment, the diversity of the skin microbiome, and the diversity of P. [Propionibacterium] acnes in particular, is increased, and that the microbial community is replenished with the types associated with healthy skin,” said Dr. Gordon, professor and chair of dermatology at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. When these new bacteria move in, they push pathogenic species out of the neighborhood “and create a new skin microbial community. Maybe this is the real reason our patients tend to stay better, once we get them better with isotretinoin.”

Dr. Gordon discussed new data published last October in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology (J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Oct 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.09.023). In a letter to the editor, William H. McCoy, IV, MD, PhD, of Washington University, St. Louis, and his associates suggest that isotretinoin induces a “sebaceous drought,” which shifts the skin microbiome from pathogenic to normophysiological.

Isotretinoin is the gold standard treatment for severe acne, but its method of action has never been fully elucidated, Dr. Gordon said. It clearly targets the sebaceous gland – decreasing sebocyte proliferation and suppressing sebum production – but an emerging body of research suggests that the drug also markedly affects dermal microbial colonization.

The entire concept of a skin microbiome is nearly as new as this new concept of isotretinoin’s effect upon it. Only in the last few years have researchers begun to characterize the complex microbial film that keeps skin healthy and resistant to infection. Dermal dysbiosis has now been associated with acne, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, and atopic dermatitis.

The 2-year pilot study compared the dermal microbiome of isotretinoin-treated acne patients with that of patients with untreated acne and normal skin. Skin samples underwent genomic analysis before isotretinoin treatment, at several periods during treatment, and about 5 months after treatment stopped. Untreated controls were evaluated at baseline and at 2, 5, and 10 months.

Not surprisingly, before treatment the microbiome was similar in both acne groups, but markedly different from that seen in normal skin. As isotretinoin’s “oil drought” dragged on, levels of Cutibacterium acnes (the new appellation for P. acnes) declined. Staphylococcus species initially increased, but then declined as well. Simultaneously, four new taxa (Rothia, Flavobacterium, Enterobacter, and Micrococcus) increased. Most patients had a restructuring of their Propionibacterium community, populated largely by the less-pathogenic strains found on normal skin.

“We suggest that isotretinoin creates a Propionibacterium ‘population bottleneck’ that selects for ‘healthy’ Propionibacterium communities and other sebaceous skin taxa that persist after treatment, resulting in long-term acne remission [i.e., normal skin],” the investigators wrote.

This is a new and very exciting finding, Dr. Gordon commented. “It appears that the reason our isotretinoin patients stay better once they get better is not from targeting the sebaceous gland itself, but by repairing the skin’s microbiome and getting it back to normal.”

Dr. Gordon reported financial relationships with numerous pharmaceutical companies. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.

[email protected]

This article was updated 2/1/19.

GRAND CAYMAN, CAYMAN ISLANDS – Isotretinoin, the go-to guy for severe acne, may not be so much a local cop as a community organizer, Kenneth B. Gordon, MD, said at the meeting provided by Global Academy for Medical Education.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

“It now appears that with isotretinoin treatment, the diversity of the skin microbiome, and the diversity of P. [Propionibacterium] acnes in particular, is increased, and that the microbial community is replenished with the types associated with healthy skin,” said Dr. Gordon, professor and chair of dermatology at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. When these new bacteria move in, they push pathogenic species out of the neighborhood “and create a new skin microbial community. Maybe this is the real reason our patients tend to stay better, once we get them better with isotretinoin.”

Dr. Gordon discussed new data published last October in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology (J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Oct 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.09.023). In a letter to the editor, William H. McCoy, IV, MD, PhD, of Washington University, St. Louis, and his associates suggest that isotretinoin induces a “sebaceous drought,” which shifts the skin microbiome from pathogenic to normophysiological.

Isotretinoin is the gold standard treatment for severe acne, but its method of action has never been fully elucidated, Dr. Gordon said. It clearly targets the sebaceous gland – decreasing sebocyte proliferation and suppressing sebum production – but an emerging body of research suggests that the drug also markedly affects dermal microbial colonization.

The entire concept of a skin microbiome is nearly as new as this new concept of isotretinoin’s effect upon it. Only in the last few years have researchers begun to characterize the complex microbial film that keeps skin healthy and resistant to infection. Dermal dysbiosis has now been associated with acne, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, and atopic dermatitis.

The 2-year pilot study compared the dermal microbiome of isotretinoin-treated acne patients with that of patients with untreated acne and normal skin. Skin samples underwent genomic analysis before isotretinoin treatment, at several periods during treatment, and about 5 months after treatment stopped. Untreated controls were evaluated at baseline and at 2, 5, and 10 months.

Not surprisingly, before treatment the microbiome was similar in both acne groups, but markedly different from that seen in normal skin. As isotretinoin’s “oil drought” dragged on, levels of Cutibacterium acnes (the new appellation for P. acnes) declined. Staphylococcus species initially increased, but then declined as well. Simultaneously, four new taxa (Rothia, Flavobacterium, Enterobacter, and Micrococcus) increased. Most patients had a restructuring of their Propionibacterium community, populated largely by the less-pathogenic strains found on normal skin.

“We suggest that isotretinoin creates a Propionibacterium ‘population bottleneck’ that selects for ‘healthy’ Propionibacterium communities and other sebaceous skin taxa that persist after treatment, resulting in long-term acne remission [i.e., normal skin],” the investigators wrote.

This is a new and very exciting finding, Dr. Gordon commented. “It appears that the reason our isotretinoin patients stay better once they get better is not from targeting the sebaceous gland itself, but by repairing the skin’s microbiome and getting it back to normal.”

Dr. Gordon reported financial relationships with numerous pharmaceutical companies. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.

[email protected]

This article was updated 2/1/19.