Neurology

Narcolepsy was originally described in the late 1800s by the French physician Jean-Baptiste-Edouard Gélineau, who reported the case of a wine merchant suffering from somnolence. In this first description, he coined the term narcolepsie by joining the Greek words narke (numbness or stupor) and lepsis (attack).¹

Since then, the disorder has been further characterized, and some insight into its biological underpinnings has been established. Importantly, treatments have improved and expanded, facilitating its management and thereby improving quality of life for those with the disorder.

This review focuses on clinically relevant features of the disorder and proposes management strategies.

CLINICAL FEATURES

Narcolepsy is characterized by instability of sleep-wake transitions.

Daytime sleepiness

Clinically, narcolepsy manifests with excessive daytime sleepiness that can be personally and socially disabling. Cataplexy, sleep paralysis, and hypnagogic or hypnopompic hallucinations can also be present,^2,3 but they are not necessary for diagnosis. In fact, a minority of patients with narcolepsy have all these symptoms.⁴ Narcolepsy is divided into type 1 (with cataplexy) and type 2 (without cataplexy).²

Sleepiness tends to be worse with inactivity, and sleep can often be irresistible. Sleep attacks can come on suddenly and may be brief enough to manifest as a lapse in consciousness.

Short naps tend to be refreshing. Rapid eye movement (REM) latency—the interval between falling asleep and the onset of the REM sleep—is short in narcolepsy, and since the REM stage is when dreaming occurs, naps often include dreaming. Therefore, when taking a history, it is worthwhile to ask patients whether they dream during naps; a yes answer supports the diagnosis of narcolepsy.⁵

In children, sleepiness can manifest in reduced concentration and behavioral issues.⁶ Napping after age 5 or 6 is considered abnormal and may reflect pathologic sleepiness.⁷

Cataplexy

Cataplexy—transient muscle weakness triggered by emotion—is a specific feature of narcolepsy type 1. It often begins in the facial muscles and can manifest with slackening of the jaw or brief dropping of the head. However, episodes can be more dramatic and, if the trunk and limb muscles are affected, can result in collapsing to the ground.

Cataplexy usually has its onset at about the same time as the sleepiness associated with narcolepsy, but it can arise even years later.⁸ Episodes can last from a few seconds to 2 minutes. Consciousness is always preserved. A range of emotions can trigger cataplexy, but typically the emotion is a positive one such as laughter or excitement.⁹ Deep tendon reflexes disappear in cataplexy, so checking reflexes during a witnessed episode can be clinically valuable.²

Cataplexy can worsen with stress and insufficient sleep, occasionally with “status cataplecticus,” in which repeated, persistent episodes of cataplexy occur over several hours.⁸ Status cataplecticus can be spontaneous or an effect of withdrawal from anticataplectic medications.²

Cataplexy is thought to represent intrusion of REM sleep and its associated muscle atonia during wakefulness.

Sleep paralysis, hallucinations

Sleep paralysis and hallucinations are other features of narcolepsy that reflect this REM dissociation from sleep.

Sleep paralysis occurs most commonly upon awakening, but sometimes just before sleep onset. In most cases, it is manifested by inability to move the limbs or speak, lasting several seconds or, in rare cases, minutes at a time. Sleep paralysis can be associated with a sensation of fear or suffocation, especially when initially experienced.⁸

Hypnopompic hallucinations, occurring upon awakening, are more common than hypnagogic hallucinations, which are experienced before falling asleep. The hallucinations are often vivid and usually visual, although other types of hallucinations are possible. Unlike those that occur in psychotic disorders, the hallucinations tend to be associated with preserved insight that they are not real.¹⁰

Notably, both sleep paralysis and hallucinations are nonspecific symptoms that are common in the general population.^8,11,12

Fragmented sleep

Although they are very sleepy, people with narcolepsy generally cannot stay asleep for very long. Their sleep tends to be extremely fragmented, and they often wake up several times a night.²

This sleep pattern reflects the inherent instability of sleep-wake transitions in narcolepsy. In fact, over a 24-hour period, adults with narcolepsy have a normal amount of sleep.¹³ In children, however, when narcolepsy first arises, the 24-hour sleep time can increase abruptly and can sometimes be associated with persistent cataplexy that can manifest as a clumsy gait.¹⁴

Weight gain, obstructive sleep apnea

Weight gain is common, particularly after symptom onset, and especially in children. As a result, obesity is a frequent comorbidity.¹⁵ Because obstructive sleep apnea can consequently develop, all patients with narcolepsy require screening for sleep-disordered breathing.

Other sleep disorders often accompany narcolepsy and are more common than in the general population.¹⁶ In a study incorporating both clinical and polysomnographic data of 100 patients with narcolepsy, insomnia was the most common comorbid sleep disorder, with a prevalence of 28%; others were REM sleep behavior disorder (24%), restless legs syndrome (24%), obstructive sleep apnea (21%), and non-REM parasomnias.¹⁷

Narcolepsy has significant psychosocial consequences. As a result of their symptoms, people with narcolepsy may not be able to meet academic or work-related demands.

Additionally, their risk of a motor vehicle accident is 3 to 4 times higher than in the general population, and more than one-third of patients have been in an accident due to sleepiness.¹⁸ There is some evidence to show that treatment eliminates this risk.¹⁹

Few systematic studies have examined mood disorders in narcolepsy. However, studies tend to show a higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders than in the general population, with depression and anxiety the most com-mon.^20,21

DIAGNOSIS IS OFTEN DELAYED

The prevalence of narcolepsy type 1 is between 25 and 100 per 100,000 people.²² In a Mayo Clinic study,²³ the incidence of narcolepsy type 1 was estimated to be 0.74 per 100,000 person-years. Epidemiologic data on narcolepsy type 2 are sparse, but patients with narcolepsy without cataplexy are thought to represent only 36% of all narcolepsy patients.²³

Diagnosis is often delayed, with the average time between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis ranging from 8 to 22 years. With increasing awareness, the efficiency of the diagnostic process is improving, and this delay is expected to lessen accordingly.²⁴

Symptoms most commonly arise in the second decade; but the age at onset ranges significantly, between the first and fifth decades. Narcolepsy has a bimodal distribution in incidence, with the biggest peak at approximately age 15 and second smaller peak in the mid-30s. Some studies have suggested a slight male predominance.^23,25

DIAGNOSIS

History is key

The history should include specific questions about the hallmark features of narcolepsy, including cataplexy, sleep paralysis, and sleep-related hallucinations. For individual assessment of subjective sleepiness, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale or Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale can be administered quickly in the office setting.^26,27

The Epworth score is calculated from the self-rated likelihood of falling asleep in 8 different situations, with possible scores of 0 (would never doze) to 3 (high chance of dozing) on each question, for a total possible score of 0 to 24. Normal total scores are between 0 and 10, while scores greater than 10 reflect pathologic sleepiness. Scores on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in those with narcolepsy tend to reflect moderate to severe sleepiness, or at least 13, as opposed to patients with obstructive sleep apnea, whose scores commonly reflect milder sleepiness.²⁸

Testing with actigraphy and polysomnography

It is imperative to rule out insufficient sleep and other sleep disorders as a cause of daytime sleepiness. This can be done with a careful clinical history, actigraphy with sleep logs, and polysomnography.

In the 2 to 4 weeks before actigraphy and subsequent testing, all medications with alerting or sedating properties (including anti­depressants) should be tapered off to prevent influence on the results of the study.

Delayed sleep-phase disorder presents at a similar age as narcolepsy and can be associated with similar degrees of sleepiness. However, individuals with delayed sleep phase disorder have an inappropriately timed sleep-wake cycle so that there is a shift in their desired sleep onset and awakening times. It is common—prevalence estimates vary but average about 1% in the general population.²⁹

Insufficient sleep syndrome is even more common, especially in teenagers and young adults, with increasing family, social, and academic demands. Sleep needs vary across the life span. A teenager needs 8 to 10 hours of sleep per night, and a young adult needs 7 to 9 hours. A study of 1,285 high school students found that 10.4% were not getting enough sleep.³⁰

If actigraphy data suggest a circadian rhythm disorder or insufficient sleep that could explain the symptoms of sleepiness, then further testing should be halted and these specific issues should be addressed. In these cases, working with the patient toward maintaining a regular sleep-wake schedule with 7 to 8 hours of nightly sleep will often resolve symptoms.

If actigraphy demonstrates the patient is maintaining a regular sleep schedule and allowing adequate time for nightly sleep, the next step is polysomnography.

Polysomnography is performed to detect other disorders that can disrupt sleep, such as sleep-disordered breathing or periodic limb movement disorder.^2,5 In addition, polysomnography can provide assurance that adequate sleep was obtained prior to the next step in testing.

Multiple sleep latency test

If sufficient sleep is obtained on polysomnograpy (at least 6 hours for an adult) and no other sleep disorder is identified, a multiple sleep latency test is performed. A urine toxicology screen is typically performed on the day of the test to ensure that drugs are not affecting the results.

The multiple sleep latency test consists of 4 to 5 nap opportunities at 2-hour intervals in a quiet dark room conducive to sleep, during which both sleep and REM latency are recorded. The sleep latency of those with narcolepsy is significantly shortened, and the diagnosis of narcolepsy requires an average sleep latency of less than 8 minutes.

Given the propensity for REM sleep in narcolepsy, another essential feature for diagnosis is the sleep-onset REM period (SOREMP). A SOREMP is defined as a REM latency of less than 15 minutes. A diagnosis of narcolepsy re-quires a SOREMP in at least 2 of the naps in a multiple sleep latency test (or 1 nap if the shortened REM latency is seen during polysomnography).³¹

The multiple sleep latency test has an imperfect sensitivity, though, and should be repeated when there is a high suspicion of narcolepsy.^32–34 It is not completely specific either, and false-positive results occur. In fact, SOREMPs can be seen in the general population, particularly in those with a circadian rhythm disorder, insufficient sleep, or sleep-disordered breathing. Two or more SOREMPs in an multiple sleep latency test can be seen in a small proportion of the general population.³⁵ The results of a multiple sleep latency test should be interpreted in the clinical context.

Differential diagnosis

Narcolepsy type 1 is distinguished from type 2 by the presence of cataplexy. A cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin 1 level of 110 pg/mL or less, or less than one-third of the mean value obtained in normal individuals, can substitute for the multiple sleep latency test in diagnosing narcolepsy type 1.³¹ Currently, hypocretin testing is generally not performed in clinical practice, although it may become a routine part of the narcolepsy evaluation in the future.

Thus, according to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, 3rd edition,³¹ the diagnosis of narcolepsy type 1 requires excessive daytime sleepiness for at least 3 months that cannot be explained by another sleep disorder, medical or neurologic disorder, mental disorder, medication use, or substance use disorder, and at least 1 of the following:

• Cataplexy and mean sleep latency of 8 minutes or less with at least 2 SOREMPs on multiple sleep latency testing (1 of which can be on the preceding night’s polysomography)
• Cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin 1 levels less than 110 pg/mL or one-third the baseline normal levels and mean sleep latency ≤ 8 minutes with ≥ 2 SOREMPs on multiple sleep latency testing.

Similarly, the diagnosis of narcolepsy type 2 requires excessive daytime sleepiness for at least 3 months that cannot be explained by another sleep disorder, medical or neurological disorder, mental disorder, medication use, or substance use disorder, plus:

• Mean sleep latency of 8 minutes or less with at least 2 SOREMPs on multiple sleep latency testing.

Idiopathic hypersomnia, another disorder of central hypersomnolence, is also characterized by disabling sleepiness. It is diagnostically differentiated from narcolepsy, as there are fewer than 2 SOREMPs. As opposed to narcolepsy, in which naps tend to be refreshing, even prolonged naps in idiopathic hypersomnia are often not helpful in restoring wakefulness. In idiopathic hypersomnia, sleep is usually not fragmented, and there are few nocturnal arousals. Sleep times can often be prolonged as well, whereas in narcolepsy total sleep time through the day may not be increased but is not consolidated.

Kleine-Levin syndrome is a rarer disorder of hypersomnia. It is episodic compared with the relatively persistent sleepiness in narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia. Periods of hypersomnia occur intermittently for days to weeks and are accompanied by cognitive and behavioral changes including hyperphagia and hypersexuality.⁴

LINKED TO HYPOCRETIN DEFICIENCY

Over the past 2 decades, the underlying pathophysiology of narcolepsy type 1 has been better characterized.

Narcolepsy type 1 has been linked to a deficiency in hypocretin in the central nervous system.³⁶ Hypocretin (also known as orexin) is a hormone produced in the hypothalamus that acts on multiple brain regions and maintains alertness. For unclear reasons, hypothalamic neurons producing hypocretin are selectively reduced in narcolepsy type 1. Hypocretin also stabilizes wakefulness and inhibits REM sleep; therefore, hypocretin deficiency can lead to inappropriate intrusions of REM sleep onto wakefulness, leading to the hallmark features of narcolepsy—cataplexy, sleep-related hallucinations, and sleep paralysis.³⁷ According to one theory, cataplexy is triggered by emotional stimuli because of a pathway between the medial prefrontal cortex and the amygdala to the pons.³⁸

Cerebrospinal fluid levels of hypocretin in patients with narcolepsy type 2 tend to be normal, and the biologic underpinnings of narcolepsy type 2 remain mysterious. However, in the subgroup of those with narcolepsy type 2 in which hypocretin is low, many individuals go on to develop cataplexy, thereby evolving to narcolepsy type 1.³⁶

POSSIBLE AUTOIMMUNE BASIS

Narcolepsy is typically a sporadic disorder, although familial cases have been described. The risk of a parent with narcolepsy having a child who is affected is approximately 1%.⁵

Narcolepsy type 1 is strongly associated with HLA-DQB1*0602, with up to 95% of those affected having at least one allele.³⁹ Having 2 copies of the allele further increases the risk of developing narcolepsy.⁴⁰ However, this allele is far from specific for narcolepsy with cataplexy, as it occurs in 12% to 38% of the general population.⁴¹ Therefore, HLA typing currently has limited clinical utility. The exact cause is as yet unknown, but substantial literature proposes an autoimmune basis of the disorder, given the strong association with the HLA subtype.^42–44

After the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, there was a significant increase in the incidence of narcolepsy with cataplexy, which again sparked interest in an autoimmune etiology underlying the disorder. Pandemrix, an H1N1 vaccine produced as a result of the 2009 pandemic, appeared to also be associated with an increase in the incidence of narcolepsy. An association with other upper respiratory infections has also been noted, further supporting a possible autoimmune basis.

A few studies have looked for serum autoantibodies involved in the pathogenesis of narcolepsy. Thus far, only one has been identified, an antibody to Tribbles homolog 2, found in 20% to 40% of those with new onset of nar-colepsy.^42–44

TREATMENTS FOR DAYTIME SLEEPINESS

As with many chronic disorders, the treatment of narcolepsy consists of symptomatic rather than curative management, which can be done through both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic means.

Nondrug measures

Scheduled naps lasting 15 to 20 minutes can help improve alertness.⁴⁵ A consistent sleep schedule with good sleep hygiene, ensuring sufficient nightly sleep, is also important. In one study, the combination of scheduled naps and regular nocturnal sleep times reduced the level of daytime sleepiness and unintentional daytime sleep. Daytime naps were most helpful for those with the highest degree of daytime sleepiness.⁴⁵

Strategic use of caffeine can be helpful and can reduce dependence on pharmacologic treatment.

Screening should be performed routinely for other sleep disorders, such as sleep-disordered breathing, which should be treated if identified.^5,18 When being treated for other medical conditions, individuals with narcolepsy should avoid medications that can cause sedation, such as opiates or barbiturates; alcohol should be minimized or avoided.

Networking with other individuals with narcolepsy through support groups such as Narcolepsy Network can be valuable for learning coping skills and connecting with community resources. Psychological counseling for the patient, and sometimes the family, can also be useful. School-age children may need special accommodations such as schedule adjustments to allow for scheduled naps or frequent breaks to maintain alertness.

People with narcolepsy tend to function better in careers that do not require long periods of sitting, as sleepiness tends to be worse, but instead offer flexibility and require higher levels of activity that tend to combat sleepiness. They should not work as commercial drivers.¹⁸

While behavioral interventions in narcolepsy are vital, they are rarely sufficient, and drugs that promote daytime wakefulness are used as an adjunct (Table 2).⁴⁶

Realistic expectations should be established when starting, as some degree of residual sleepiness usually remains even with optimal medical therapy. Medications should be strategically scheduled to maximize alertness during necessary times such as at work or school or during driving. Patients should specifically be counseled to avoid driving if sleepy.^18,47

Modafinil is often used as a first-line therapy, given its favorable side-effect profile and low potential for abuse. Its pharmacologic action has been debated but it probably acts as a selective dopamine reuptake inhibitor. It is typically taken twice daily (upon waking and early afternoon) and is usually well tolerated.

Potential side effects include headache, nausea, dry mouth, anorexia, diarrhea, and, rarely, Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Cardiovascular side effects are minimal, making it a favorable choice in older patients.^18,48

A trial in 283 patients showed significantly lower levels of sleepiness in patients taking modafinil 200 mg or 400 mg than in a control group. Other trials have supported these findings and showed improved driving performance on modafinil.¹⁸

Notably, modafinil can increase the metabolism of oral contraceptives, thereby reducing their efficacy. Women of childbearing age should be warned about this interaction and should be transitioned to nonhormonal forms of contraception.^2,47

Armodafinil, a purified R-isomer of modafinil, has a longer half-life and requires only once-daily dosing.⁵

If modafinil or armodafinil fails to optimally manage daytime sleepiness, a traditional stimulant such as methylphenidate or an amphetamine is often used.

Methylphenidate and amphetamines primarily inhibit the reuptake and increase the release of the monoamines, mainly dopamine, and to a lesser degree serotonin and norepinephrine.

These drugs have more significant adverse effects that can involve the cardiovascular system, causing hypertension and arrhythmias. Anorexia, weight loss, and, particularly with high doses, psychosis can occur.⁴⁹

These drugs should be avoided in patients with a history of significant cardiovascular disease. Before starting stimulant therapy, a thorough cardiovascular examination should be done, often including electrocardiography to ensure there is no baseline arrhythmia.

Patients on these medications should be followed closely to ensure that blood pressure, pulse, and weight are not negatively affected.^18,50 Addiction and tolerance can develop with these drugs, and follow-up should include assessment for dependence. Some states may require prescription drug monitoring to ensure the drugs are not being abused or diverted.

Short- and long-acting formulations of both methylphenidate and amphetamines are available, and a long-acting form is often used in conjunction with a short-acting form as needed.¹⁸

Addiction and drug-seeking behavior can develop but are unusual in those taking stimulants to treat narcolepsy.⁴⁹

Follow-up

Residual daytime sleepiness can be measured subjectively through the Epworth Sleepiness Scale on follow-up. If necessary, a maintenance-of-wakefulness test can provide an objective assessment of treatment efficacy.¹⁸

As narcolepsy is a chronic disorder, treatment should evolve with time. Most medications that treat narcolepsy are categorized by the US Food and Drug Administration as pregnancy category C, as we do not have adequate studies in human pregnancies to evaluate their effects. When a patient with narcolepsy becomes pregnant, she should be counseled about the risks and benefits of remaining on therapy. Treatment should balance the risks of sleepiness with the potential risks of remaining on medications.⁵⁰ In the elderly, as cardiovascular comorbidities tend to increase, the risks and benefits of therapy should be routinely reevaluated.

For cataplexy

Sodium oxybate,^51–53 the most potent anticataplectic drug, is the sodium salt of gamma hydroxybutyrate, a metabolite of gamma-aminobutyric acid. Sodium oxybate can be prescribed in the United States, Canada, and Europe. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine recommends sodium oxybate for cataplexy, daytime sleepiness, and disrupted sleep based on 3 level-1 studies and 2 level-4 studies.⁴⁶

Sodium oxybate increases slow-wave sleep, improves sleep continuity, and often helps to mitigate daytime sleepiness. Due to its short half-life, its administration is unusual: the first dose is taken before bedtime and the second dose 2.5 to 4 hours later. Some patients set an alarm clock to take the second dose, while others awaken spontaneously to take the second dose. Most patients find that with adherence to dosing and safety instructions, sodium oxybate can serve as a highly effective form of treatment of both excessive sleepiness and cataplexy and may reduce the need for stimulant-based therapies.

The most common adverse effects are nausea, mood swings, and enuresis. Occasionally, psychosis can result and limit use of the drug. Obstructive sleep apnea can also develop or worsen.⁵² Because of its high salt content, sodium oxybate should be used with caution in those with heart failure, hypertension, or renal impairment. Its relative, gamma hydroxybutyrate, causes rapid sedation and has been notorious for illegal use as a date rape drug.

In the United States, sodium oxybate is distributed only through a central pharmacy to mitigate potential abuse. Due to this system, the rates of diversion are extremely low, estimated in a postmarketing analysis to be 1 instance per 5,200 patients treated. In the same study, abuse and dependence were both rare as well, about 1 case for every 2,600 and 6,500 patients treated.^6,18,52,53

Antidepressants promote the action of norepinephrine and, to a lesser degree, serotonin, thereby suppressing REM sleep.

Venlafaxine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is often used as a first-line treatment for cataplexy. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as fluoxetine are also used with success. Tricyclic antidepressants such as protriptyline or clomipramine are extremely effective for cataplexy, but are rarely used due to their adverse effects.^2,47

FUTURE WORK

While our understanding of narcolepsy has advanced, there are still gaps in our knowledge of the disorder—namely, the specific trigger for the loss of hypocretin neurons in type 1 narcolepsy and the underlying pathophysiology of type 2.

A number of emerging therapies target the hypocretin system, including peptide replacement, neuronal transplant, and immunotherapy preventing hypocretin neuronal cell death.^50,54,55 Additional drugs designed to improve alertness that do not involve the hypocretin system are also being developed, including a histamine inverse agonist.^50,56 Sodium oxybate and modafinil, although currently approved for use in adults, are still off-label in pediatric practice. Studies of the safety and efficacy of these medications in children are needed.^7,57

Narcolepsy was originally described in the late 1800s by the French physician Jean-Baptiste-Edouard Gélineau, who reported the case of a wine merchant suffering from somnolence. In this first description, he coined the term narcolepsie by joining the Greek words narke (numbness or stupor) and lepsis (attack).¹

Since then, the disorder has been further characterized, and some insight into its biological underpinnings has been established. Importantly, treatments have improved and expanded, facilitating its management and thereby improving quality of life for those with the disorder.

This review focuses on clinically relevant features of the disorder and proposes management strategies.

CLINICAL FEATURES

Narcolepsy is characterized by instability of sleep-wake transitions.

Daytime sleepiness

Clinically, narcolepsy manifests with excessive daytime sleepiness that can be personally and socially disabling. Cataplexy, sleep paralysis, and hypnagogic or hypnopompic hallucinations can also be present,^2,3 but they are not necessary for diagnosis. In fact, a minority of patients with narcolepsy have all these symptoms.⁴ Narcolepsy is divided into type 1 (with cataplexy) and type 2 (without cataplexy).²

Sleepiness tends to be worse with inactivity, and sleep can often be irresistible. Sleep attacks can come on suddenly and may be brief enough to manifest as a lapse in consciousness.

Short naps tend to be refreshing. Rapid eye movement (REM) latency—the interval between falling asleep and the onset of the REM sleep—is short in narcolepsy, and since the REM stage is when dreaming occurs, naps often include dreaming. Therefore, when taking a history, it is worthwhile to ask patients whether they dream during naps; a yes answer supports the diagnosis of narcolepsy.⁵

In children, sleepiness can manifest in reduced concentration and behavioral issues.⁶ Napping after age 5 or 6 is considered abnormal and may reflect pathologic sleepiness.⁷

Cataplexy

Cataplexy—transient muscle weakness triggered by emotion—is a specific feature of narcolepsy type 1. It often begins in the facial muscles and can manifest with slackening of the jaw or brief dropping of the head. However, episodes can be more dramatic and, if the trunk and limb muscles are affected, can result in collapsing to the ground.

Cataplexy usually has its onset at about the same time as the sleepiness associated with narcolepsy, but it can arise even years later.⁸ Episodes can last from a few seconds to 2 minutes. Consciousness is always preserved. A range of emotions can trigger cataplexy, but typically the emotion is a positive one such as laughter or excitement.⁹ Deep tendon reflexes disappear in cataplexy, so checking reflexes during a witnessed episode can be clinically valuable.²

Cataplexy can worsen with stress and insufficient sleep, occasionally with “status cataplecticus,” in which repeated, persistent episodes of cataplexy occur over several hours.⁸ Status cataplecticus can be spontaneous or an effect of withdrawal from anticataplectic medications.²

Cataplexy is thought to represent intrusion of REM sleep and its associated muscle atonia during wakefulness.

Sleep paralysis, hallucinations

Sleep paralysis and hallucinations are other features of narcolepsy that reflect this REM dissociation from sleep.

Sleep paralysis occurs most commonly upon awakening, but sometimes just before sleep onset. In most cases, it is manifested by inability to move the limbs or speak, lasting several seconds or, in rare cases, minutes at a time. Sleep paralysis can be associated with a sensation of fear or suffocation, especially when initially experienced.⁸

Hypnopompic hallucinations, occurring upon awakening, are more common than hypnagogic hallucinations, which are experienced before falling asleep. The hallucinations are often vivid and usually visual, although other types of hallucinations are possible. Unlike those that occur in psychotic disorders, the hallucinations tend to be associated with preserved insight that they are not real.¹⁰

Notably, both sleep paralysis and hallucinations are nonspecific symptoms that are common in the general population.^8,11,12

Fragmented sleep

Although they are very sleepy, people with narcolepsy generally cannot stay asleep for very long. Their sleep tends to be extremely fragmented, and they often wake up several times a night.²

This sleep pattern reflects the inherent instability of sleep-wake transitions in narcolepsy. In fact, over a 24-hour period, adults with narcolepsy have a normal amount of sleep.¹³ In children, however, when narcolepsy first arises, the 24-hour sleep time can increase abruptly and can sometimes be associated with persistent cataplexy that can manifest as a clumsy gait.¹⁴

Weight gain, obstructive sleep apnea

Weight gain is common, particularly after symptom onset, and especially in children. As a result, obesity is a frequent comorbidity.¹⁵ Because obstructive sleep apnea can consequently develop, all patients with narcolepsy require screening for sleep-disordered breathing.

Other sleep disorders often accompany narcolepsy and are more common than in the general population.¹⁶ In a study incorporating both clinical and polysomnographic data of 100 patients with narcolepsy, insomnia was the most common comorbid sleep disorder, with a prevalence of 28%; others were REM sleep behavior disorder (24%), restless legs syndrome (24%), obstructive sleep apnea (21%), and non-REM parasomnias.¹⁷

Narcolepsy has significant psychosocial consequences. As a result of their symptoms, people with narcolepsy may not be able to meet academic or work-related demands.

Additionally, their risk of a motor vehicle accident is 3 to 4 times higher than in the general population, and more than one-third of patients have been in an accident due to sleepiness.¹⁸ There is some evidence to show that treatment eliminates this risk.¹⁹

Few systematic studies have examined mood disorders in narcolepsy. However, studies tend to show a higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders than in the general population, with depression and anxiety the most com-mon.^20,21

DIAGNOSIS IS OFTEN DELAYED

The prevalence of narcolepsy type 1 is between 25 and 100 per 100,000 people.²² In a Mayo Clinic study,²³ the incidence of narcolepsy type 1 was estimated to be 0.74 per 100,000 person-years. Epidemiologic data on narcolepsy type 2 are sparse, but patients with narcolepsy without cataplexy are thought to represent only 36% of all narcolepsy patients.²³

Diagnosis is often delayed, with the average time between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis ranging from 8 to 22 years. With increasing awareness, the efficiency of the diagnostic process is improving, and this delay is expected to lessen accordingly.²⁴

Symptoms most commonly arise in the second decade; but the age at onset ranges significantly, between the first and fifth decades. Narcolepsy has a bimodal distribution in incidence, with the biggest peak at approximately age 15 and second smaller peak in the mid-30s. Some studies have suggested a slight male predominance.^23,25

DIAGNOSIS

History is key

The history should include specific questions about the hallmark features of narcolepsy, including cataplexy, sleep paralysis, and sleep-related hallucinations. For individual assessment of subjective sleepiness, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale or Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale can be administered quickly in the office setting.^26,27

The Epworth score is calculated from the self-rated likelihood of falling asleep in 8 different situations, with possible scores of 0 (would never doze) to 3 (high chance of dozing) on each question, for a total possible score of 0 to 24. Normal total scores are between 0 and 10, while scores greater than 10 reflect pathologic sleepiness. Scores on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in those with narcolepsy tend to reflect moderate to severe sleepiness, or at least 13, as opposed to patients with obstructive sleep apnea, whose scores commonly reflect milder sleepiness.²⁸

Testing with actigraphy and polysomnography

It is imperative to rule out insufficient sleep and other sleep disorders as a cause of daytime sleepiness. This can be done with a careful clinical history, actigraphy with sleep logs, and polysomnography.

In the 2 to 4 weeks before actigraphy and subsequent testing, all medications with alerting or sedating properties (including anti­depressants) should be tapered off to prevent influence on the results of the study.

Delayed sleep-phase disorder presents at a similar age as narcolepsy and can be associated with similar degrees of sleepiness. However, individuals with delayed sleep phase disorder have an inappropriately timed sleep-wake cycle so that there is a shift in their desired sleep onset and awakening times. It is common—prevalence estimates vary but average about 1% in the general population.²⁹

Insufficient sleep syndrome is even more common, especially in teenagers and young adults, with increasing family, social, and academic demands. Sleep needs vary across the life span. A teenager needs 8 to 10 hours of sleep per night, and a young adult needs 7 to 9 hours. A study of 1,285 high school students found that 10.4% were not getting enough sleep.³⁰

If actigraphy data suggest a circadian rhythm disorder or insufficient sleep that could explain the symptoms of sleepiness, then further testing should be halted and these specific issues should be addressed. In these cases, working with the patient toward maintaining a regular sleep-wake schedule with 7 to 8 hours of nightly sleep will often resolve symptoms.

If actigraphy demonstrates the patient is maintaining a regular sleep schedule and allowing adequate time for nightly sleep, the next step is polysomnography.

Polysomnography is performed to detect other disorders that can disrupt sleep, such as sleep-disordered breathing or periodic limb movement disorder.^2,5 In addition, polysomnography can provide assurance that adequate sleep was obtained prior to the next step in testing.

Multiple sleep latency test

If sufficient sleep is obtained on polysomnograpy (at least 6 hours for an adult) and no other sleep disorder is identified, a multiple sleep latency test is performed. A urine toxicology screen is typically performed on the day of the test to ensure that drugs are not affecting the results.

The multiple sleep latency test consists of 4 to 5 nap opportunities at 2-hour intervals in a quiet dark room conducive to sleep, during which both sleep and REM latency are recorded. The sleep latency of those with narcolepsy is significantly shortened, and the diagnosis of narcolepsy requires an average sleep latency of less than 8 minutes.

Given the propensity for REM sleep in narcolepsy, another essential feature for diagnosis is the sleep-onset REM period (SOREMP). A SOREMP is defined as a REM latency of less than 15 minutes. A diagnosis of narcolepsy re-quires a SOREMP in at least 2 of the naps in a multiple sleep latency test (or 1 nap if the shortened REM latency is seen during polysomnography).³¹

The multiple sleep latency test has an imperfect sensitivity, though, and should be repeated when there is a high suspicion of narcolepsy.^32–34 It is not completely specific either, and false-positive results occur. In fact, SOREMPs can be seen in the general population, particularly in those with a circadian rhythm disorder, insufficient sleep, or sleep-disordered breathing. Two or more SOREMPs in an multiple sleep latency test can be seen in a small proportion of the general population.³⁵ The results of a multiple sleep latency test should be interpreted in the clinical context.

Differential diagnosis

Narcolepsy type 1 is distinguished from type 2 by the presence of cataplexy. A cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin 1 level of 110 pg/mL or less, or less than one-third of the mean value obtained in normal individuals, can substitute for the multiple sleep latency test in diagnosing narcolepsy type 1.³¹ Currently, hypocretin testing is generally not performed in clinical practice, although it may become a routine part of the narcolepsy evaluation in the future.

Thus, according to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, 3rd edition,³¹ the diagnosis of narcolepsy type 1 requires excessive daytime sleepiness for at least 3 months that cannot be explained by another sleep disorder, medical or neurologic disorder, mental disorder, medication use, or substance use disorder, and at least 1 of the following:

• Cataplexy and mean sleep latency of 8 minutes or less with at least 2 SOREMPs on multiple sleep latency testing (1 of which can be on the preceding night’s polysomography)
• Cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin 1 levels less than 110 pg/mL or one-third the baseline normal levels and mean sleep latency ≤ 8 minutes with ≥ 2 SOREMPs on multiple sleep latency testing.

Similarly, the diagnosis of narcolepsy type 2 requires excessive daytime sleepiness for at least 3 months that cannot be explained by another sleep disorder, medical or neurological disorder, mental disorder, medication use, or substance use disorder, plus:

• Mean sleep latency of 8 minutes or less with at least 2 SOREMPs on multiple sleep latency testing.

Idiopathic hypersomnia, another disorder of central hypersomnolence, is also characterized by disabling sleepiness. It is diagnostically differentiated from narcolepsy, as there are fewer than 2 SOREMPs. As opposed to narcolepsy, in which naps tend to be refreshing, even prolonged naps in idiopathic hypersomnia are often not helpful in restoring wakefulness. In idiopathic hypersomnia, sleep is usually not fragmented, and there are few nocturnal arousals. Sleep times can often be prolonged as well, whereas in narcolepsy total sleep time through the day may not be increased but is not consolidated.

Kleine-Levin syndrome is a rarer disorder of hypersomnia. It is episodic compared with the relatively persistent sleepiness in narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia. Periods of hypersomnia occur intermittently for days to weeks and are accompanied by cognitive and behavioral changes including hyperphagia and hypersexuality.⁴

LINKED TO HYPOCRETIN DEFICIENCY

Over the past 2 decades, the underlying pathophysiology of narcolepsy type 1 has been better characterized.

Narcolepsy type 1 has been linked to a deficiency in hypocretin in the central nervous system.³⁶ Hypocretin (also known as orexin) is a hormone produced in the hypothalamus that acts on multiple brain regions and maintains alertness. For unclear reasons, hypothalamic neurons producing hypocretin are selectively reduced in narcolepsy type 1. Hypocretin also stabilizes wakefulness and inhibits REM sleep; therefore, hypocretin deficiency can lead to inappropriate intrusions of REM sleep onto wakefulness, leading to the hallmark features of narcolepsy—cataplexy, sleep-related hallucinations, and sleep paralysis.³⁷ According to one theory, cataplexy is triggered by emotional stimuli because of a pathway between the medial prefrontal cortex and the amygdala to the pons.³⁸

Cerebrospinal fluid levels of hypocretin in patients with narcolepsy type 2 tend to be normal, and the biologic underpinnings of narcolepsy type 2 remain mysterious. However, in the subgroup of those with narcolepsy type 2 in which hypocretin is low, many individuals go on to develop cataplexy, thereby evolving to narcolepsy type 1.³⁶

POSSIBLE AUTOIMMUNE BASIS

Narcolepsy is typically a sporadic disorder, although familial cases have been described. The risk of a parent with narcolepsy having a child who is affected is approximately 1%.⁵

Narcolepsy type 1 is strongly associated with HLA-DQB1*0602, with up to 95% of those affected having at least one allele.³⁹ Having 2 copies of the allele further increases the risk of developing narcolepsy.⁴⁰ However, this allele is far from specific for narcolepsy with cataplexy, as it occurs in 12% to 38% of the general population.⁴¹ Therefore, HLA typing currently has limited clinical utility. The exact cause is as yet unknown, but substantial literature proposes an autoimmune basis of the disorder, given the strong association with the HLA subtype.^42–44

After the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, there was a significant increase in the incidence of narcolepsy with cataplexy, which again sparked interest in an autoimmune etiology underlying the disorder. Pandemrix, an H1N1 vaccine produced as a result of the 2009 pandemic, appeared to also be associated with an increase in the incidence of narcolepsy. An association with other upper respiratory infections has also been noted, further supporting a possible autoimmune basis.

A few studies have looked for serum autoantibodies involved in the pathogenesis of narcolepsy. Thus far, only one has been identified, an antibody to Tribbles homolog 2, found in 20% to 40% of those with new onset of nar-colepsy.^42–44

TREATMENTS FOR DAYTIME SLEEPINESS

As with many chronic disorders, the treatment of narcolepsy consists of symptomatic rather than curative management, which can be done through both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic means.

Nondrug measures

Scheduled naps lasting 15 to 20 minutes can help improve alertness.⁴⁵ A consistent sleep schedule with good sleep hygiene, ensuring sufficient nightly sleep, is also important. In one study, the combination of scheduled naps and regular nocturnal sleep times reduced the level of daytime sleepiness and unintentional daytime sleep. Daytime naps were most helpful for those with the highest degree of daytime sleepiness.⁴⁵

Strategic use of caffeine can be helpful and can reduce dependence on pharmacologic treatment.

Screening should be performed routinely for other sleep disorders, such as sleep-disordered breathing, which should be treated if identified.^5,18 When being treated for other medical conditions, individuals with narcolepsy should avoid medications that can cause sedation, such as opiates or barbiturates; alcohol should be minimized or avoided.

Networking with other individuals with narcolepsy through support groups such as Narcolepsy Network can be valuable for learning coping skills and connecting with community resources. Psychological counseling for the patient, and sometimes the family, can also be useful. School-age children may need special accommodations such as schedule adjustments to allow for scheduled naps or frequent breaks to maintain alertness.

People with narcolepsy tend to function better in careers that do not require long periods of sitting, as sleepiness tends to be worse, but instead offer flexibility and require higher levels of activity that tend to combat sleepiness. They should not work as commercial drivers.¹⁸

While behavioral interventions in narcolepsy are vital, they are rarely sufficient, and drugs that promote daytime wakefulness are used as an adjunct (Table 2).⁴⁶

Realistic expectations should be established when starting, as some degree of residual sleepiness usually remains even with optimal medical therapy. Medications should be strategically scheduled to maximize alertness during necessary times such as at work or school or during driving. Patients should specifically be counseled to avoid driving if sleepy.^18,47

Modafinil is often used as a first-line therapy, given its favorable side-effect profile and low potential for abuse. Its pharmacologic action has been debated but it probably acts as a selective dopamine reuptake inhibitor. It is typically taken twice daily (upon waking and early afternoon) and is usually well tolerated.

Potential side effects include headache, nausea, dry mouth, anorexia, diarrhea, and, rarely, Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Cardiovascular side effects are minimal, making it a favorable choice in older patients.^18,48

A trial in 283 patients showed significantly lower levels of sleepiness in patients taking modafinil 200 mg or 400 mg than in a control group. Other trials have supported these findings and showed improved driving performance on modafinil.¹⁸

Notably, modafinil can increase the metabolism of oral contraceptives, thereby reducing their efficacy. Women of childbearing age should be warned about this interaction and should be transitioned to nonhormonal forms of contraception.^2,47

Armodafinil, a purified R-isomer of modafinil, has a longer half-life and requires only once-daily dosing.⁵

If modafinil or armodafinil fails to optimally manage daytime sleepiness, a traditional stimulant such as methylphenidate or an amphetamine is often used.

Methylphenidate and amphetamines primarily inhibit the reuptake and increase the release of the monoamines, mainly dopamine, and to a lesser degree serotonin and norepinephrine.

These drugs have more significant adverse effects that can involve the cardiovascular system, causing hypertension and arrhythmias. Anorexia, weight loss, and, particularly with high doses, psychosis can occur.⁴⁹

These drugs should be avoided in patients with a history of significant cardiovascular disease. Before starting stimulant therapy, a thorough cardiovascular examination should be done, often including electrocardiography to ensure there is no baseline arrhythmia.

Patients on these medications should be followed closely to ensure that blood pressure, pulse, and weight are not negatively affected.^18,50 Addiction and tolerance can develop with these drugs, and follow-up should include assessment for dependence. Some states may require prescription drug monitoring to ensure the drugs are not being abused or diverted.

Short- and long-acting formulations of both methylphenidate and amphetamines are available, and a long-acting form is often used in conjunction with a short-acting form as needed.¹⁸

Addiction and drug-seeking behavior can develop but are unusual in those taking stimulants to treat narcolepsy.⁴⁹

Follow-up

Residual daytime sleepiness can be measured subjectively through the Epworth Sleepiness Scale on follow-up. If necessary, a maintenance-of-wakefulness test can provide an objective assessment of treatment efficacy.¹⁸

As narcolepsy is a chronic disorder, treatment should evolve with time. Most medications that treat narcolepsy are categorized by the US Food and Drug Administration as pregnancy category C, as we do not have adequate studies in human pregnancies to evaluate their effects. When a patient with narcolepsy becomes pregnant, she should be counseled about the risks and benefits of remaining on therapy. Treatment should balance the risks of sleepiness with the potential risks of remaining on medications.⁵⁰ In the elderly, as cardiovascular comorbidities tend to increase, the risks and benefits of therapy should be routinely reevaluated.

For cataplexy

Sodium oxybate,^51–53 the most potent anticataplectic drug, is the sodium salt of gamma hydroxybutyrate, a metabolite of gamma-aminobutyric acid. Sodium oxybate can be prescribed in the United States, Canada, and Europe. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine recommends sodium oxybate for cataplexy, daytime sleepiness, and disrupted sleep based on 3 level-1 studies and 2 level-4 studies.⁴⁶

Sodium oxybate increases slow-wave sleep, improves sleep continuity, and often helps to mitigate daytime sleepiness. Due to its short half-life, its administration is unusual: the first dose is taken before bedtime and the second dose 2.5 to 4 hours later. Some patients set an alarm clock to take the second dose, while others awaken spontaneously to take the second dose. Most patients find that with adherence to dosing and safety instructions, sodium oxybate can serve as a highly effective form of treatment of both excessive sleepiness and cataplexy and may reduce the need for stimulant-based therapies.

The most common adverse effects are nausea, mood swings, and enuresis. Occasionally, psychosis can result and limit use of the drug. Obstructive sleep apnea can also develop or worsen.⁵² Because of its high salt content, sodium oxybate should be used with caution in those with heart failure, hypertension, or renal impairment. Its relative, gamma hydroxybutyrate, causes rapid sedation and has been notorious for illegal use as a date rape drug.

In the United States, sodium oxybate is distributed only through a central pharmacy to mitigate potential abuse. Due to this system, the rates of diversion are extremely low, estimated in a postmarketing analysis to be 1 instance per 5,200 patients treated. In the same study, abuse and dependence were both rare as well, about 1 case for every 2,600 and 6,500 patients treated.^6,18,52,53

Antidepressants promote the action of norepinephrine and, to a lesser degree, serotonin, thereby suppressing REM sleep.

Venlafaxine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is often used as a first-line treatment for cataplexy. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as fluoxetine are also used with success. Tricyclic antidepressants such as protriptyline or clomipramine are extremely effective for cataplexy, but are rarely used due to their adverse effects.^2,47

FUTURE WORK

While our understanding of narcolepsy has advanced, there are still gaps in our knowledge of the disorder—namely, the specific trigger for the loss of hypocretin neurons in type 1 narcolepsy and the underlying pathophysiology of type 2.

A number of emerging therapies target the hypocretin system, including peptide replacement, neuronal transplant, and immunotherapy preventing hypocretin neuronal cell death.^50,54,55 Additional drugs designed to improve alertness that do not involve the hypocretin system are also being developed, including a histamine inverse agonist.^50,56 Sodium oxybate and modafinil, although currently approved for use in adults, are still off-label in pediatric practice. Studies of the safety and efficacy of these medications in children are needed.^7,57

Narcolepsy was originally described in the late 1800s by the French physician Jean-Baptiste-Edouard Gélineau, who reported the case of a wine merchant suffering from somnolence. In this first description, he coined the term narcolepsie by joining the Greek words narke (numbness or stupor) and lepsis (attack).¹

Since then, the disorder has been further characterized, and some insight into its biological underpinnings has been established. Importantly, treatments have improved and expanded, facilitating its management and thereby improving quality of life for those with the disorder.

This review focuses on clinically relevant features of the disorder and proposes management strategies.

CLINICAL FEATURES

Narcolepsy is characterized by instability of sleep-wake transitions.

Daytime sleepiness

Clinically, narcolepsy manifests with excessive daytime sleepiness that can be personally and socially disabling. Cataplexy, sleep paralysis, and hypnagogic or hypnopompic hallucinations can also be present,^2,3 but they are not necessary for diagnosis. In fact, a minority of patients with narcolepsy have all these symptoms.⁴ Narcolepsy is divided into type 1 (with cataplexy) and type 2 (without cataplexy).²

Sleepiness tends to be worse with inactivity, and sleep can often be irresistible. Sleep attacks can come on suddenly and may be brief enough to manifest as a lapse in consciousness.

Short naps tend to be refreshing. Rapid eye movement (REM) latency—the interval between falling asleep and the onset of the REM sleep—is short in narcolepsy, and since the REM stage is when dreaming occurs, naps often include dreaming. Therefore, when taking a history, it is worthwhile to ask patients whether they dream during naps; a yes answer supports the diagnosis of narcolepsy.⁵

In children, sleepiness can manifest in reduced concentration and behavioral issues.⁶ Napping after age 5 or 6 is considered abnormal and may reflect pathologic sleepiness.⁷

Cataplexy

Cataplexy—transient muscle weakness triggered by emotion—is a specific feature of narcolepsy type 1. It often begins in the facial muscles and can manifest with slackening of the jaw or brief dropping of the head. However, episodes can be more dramatic and, if the trunk and limb muscles are affected, can result in collapsing to the ground.

Cataplexy usually has its onset at about the same time as the sleepiness associated with narcolepsy, but it can arise even years later.⁸ Episodes can last from a few seconds to 2 minutes. Consciousness is always preserved. A range of emotions can trigger cataplexy, but typically the emotion is a positive one such as laughter or excitement.⁹ Deep tendon reflexes disappear in cataplexy, so checking reflexes during a witnessed episode can be clinically valuable.²

Cataplexy can worsen with stress and insufficient sleep, occasionally with “status cataplecticus,” in which repeated, persistent episodes of cataplexy occur over several hours.⁸ Status cataplecticus can be spontaneous or an effect of withdrawal from anticataplectic medications.²

Cataplexy is thought to represent intrusion of REM sleep and its associated muscle atonia during wakefulness.

Sleep paralysis, hallucinations

Sleep paralysis and hallucinations are other features of narcolepsy that reflect this REM dissociation from sleep.

Sleep paralysis occurs most commonly upon awakening, but sometimes just before sleep onset. In most cases, it is manifested by inability to move the limbs or speak, lasting several seconds or, in rare cases, minutes at a time. Sleep paralysis can be associated with a sensation of fear or suffocation, especially when initially experienced.⁸

Hypnopompic hallucinations, occurring upon awakening, are more common than hypnagogic hallucinations, which are experienced before falling asleep. The hallucinations are often vivid and usually visual, although other types of hallucinations are possible. Unlike those that occur in psychotic disorders, the hallucinations tend to be associated with preserved insight that they are not real.¹⁰

Notably, both sleep paralysis and hallucinations are nonspecific symptoms that are common in the general population.^8,11,12

Fragmented sleep

Although they are very sleepy, people with narcolepsy generally cannot stay asleep for very long. Their sleep tends to be extremely fragmented, and they often wake up several times a night.²

This sleep pattern reflects the inherent instability of sleep-wake transitions in narcolepsy. In fact, over a 24-hour period, adults with narcolepsy have a normal amount of sleep.¹³ In children, however, when narcolepsy first arises, the 24-hour sleep time can increase abruptly and can sometimes be associated with persistent cataplexy that can manifest as a clumsy gait.¹⁴

Weight gain, obstructive sleep apnea

Weight gain is common, particularly after symptom onset, and especially in children. As a result, obesity is a frequent comorbidity.¹⁵ Because obstructive sleep apnea can consequently develop, all patients with narcolepsy require screening for sleep-disordered breathing.

Other sleep disorders often accompany narcolepsy and are more common than in the general population.¹⁶ In a study incorporating both clinical and polysomnographic data of 100 patients with narcolepsy, insomnia was the most common comorbid sleep disorder, with a prevalence of 28%; others were REM sleep behavior disorder (24%), restless legs syndrome (24%), obstructive sleep apnea (21%), and non-REM parasomnias.¹⁷

Narcolepsy has significant psychosocial consequences. As a result of their symptoms, people with narcolepsy may not be able to meet academic or work-related demands.

Additionally, their risk of a motor vehicle accident is 3 to 4 times higher than in the general population, and more than one-third of patients have been in an accident due to sleepiness.¹⁸ There is some evidence to show that treatment eliminates this risk.¹⁹

Few systematic studies have examined mood disorders in narcolepsy. However, studies tend to show a higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders than in the general population, with depression and anxiety the most com-mon.^20,21

DIAGNOSIS IS OFTEN DELAYED

The prevalence of narcolepsy type 1 is between 25 and 100 per 100,000 people.²² In a Mayo Clinic study,²³ the incidence of narcolepsy type 1 was estimated to be 0.74 per 100,000 person-years. Epidemiologic data on narcolepsy type 2 are sparse, but patients with narcolepsy without cataplexy are thought to represent only 36% of all narcolepsy patients.²³

Diagnosis is often delayed, with the average time between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis ranging from 8 to 22 years. With increasing awareness, the efficiency of the diagnostic process is improving, and this delay is expected to lessen accordingly.²⁴

Symptoms most commonly arise in the second decade; but the age at onset ranges significantly, between the first and fifth decades. Narcolepsy has a bimodal distribution in incidence, with the biggest peak at approximately age 15 and second smaller peak in the mid-30s. Some studies have suggested a slight male predominance.^23,25

DIAGNOSIS

History is key

The history should include specific questions about the hallmark features of narcolepsy, including cataplexy, sleep paralysis, and sleep-related hallucinations. For individual assessment of subjective sleepiness, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale or Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale can be administered quickly in the office setting.^26,27

The Epworth score is calculated from the self-rated likelihood of falling asleep in 8 different situations, with possible scores of 0 (would never doze) to 3 (high chance of dozing) on each question, for a total possible score of 0 to 24. Normal total scores are between 0 and 10, while scores greater than 10 reflect pathologic sleepiness. Scores on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in those with narcolepsy tend to reflect moderate to severe sleepiness, or at least 13, as opposed to patients with obstructive sleep apnea, whose scores commonly reflect milder sleepiness.²⁸

Testing with actigraphy and polysomnography

It is imperative to rule out insufficient sleep and other sleep disorders as a cause of daytime sleepiness. This can be done with a careful clinical history, actigraphy with sleep logs, and polysomnography.

In the 2 to 4 weeks before actigraphy and subsequent testing, all medications with alerting or sedating properties (including anti­depressants) should be tapered off to prevent influence on the results of the study.

Delayed sleep-phase disorder presents at a similar age as narcolepsy and can be associated with similar degrees of sleepiness. However, individuals with delayed sleep phase disorder have an inappropriately timed sleep-wake cycle so that there is a shift in their desired sleep onset and awakening times. It is common—prevalence estimates vary but average about 1% in the general population.²⁹

Insufficient sleep syndrome is even more common, especially in teenagers and young adults, with increasing family, social, and academic demands. Sleep needs vary across the life span. A teenager needs 8 to 10 hours of sleep per night, and a young adult needs 7 to 9 hours. A study of 1,285 high school students found that 10.4% were not getting enough sleep.³⁰

If actigraphy data suggest a circadian rhythm disorder or insufficient sleep that could explain the symptoms of sleepiness, then further testing should be halted and these specific issues should be addressed. In these cases, working with the patient toward maintaining a regular sleep-wake schedule with 7 to 8 hours of nightly sleep will often resolve symptoms.

If actigraphy demonstrates the patient is maintaining a regular sleep schedule and allowing adequate time for nightly sleep, the next step is polysomnography.

Polysomnography is performed to detect other disorders that can disrupt sleep, such as sleep-disordered breathing or periodic limb movement disorder.^2,5 In addition, polysomnography can provide assurance that adequate sleep was obtained prior to the next step in testing.

Multiple sleep latency test

If sufficient sleep is obtained on polysomnograpy (at least 6 hours for an adult) and no other sleep disorder is identified, a multiple sleep latency test is performed. A urine toxicology screen is typically performed on the day of the test to ensure that drugs are not affecting the results.

The multiple sleep latency test consists of 4 to 5 nap opportunities at 2-hour intervals in a quiet dark room conducive to sleep, during which both sleep and REM latency are recorded. The sleep latency of those with narcolepsy is significantly shortened, and the diagnosis of narcolepsy requires an average sleep latency of less than 8 minutes.

Given the propensity for REM sleep in narcolepsy, another essential feature for diagnosis is the sleep-onset REM period (SOREMP). A SOREMP is defined as a REM latency of less than 15 minutes. A diagnosis of narcolepsy re-quires a SOREMP in at least 2 of the naps in a multiple sleep latency test (or 1 nap if the shortened REM latency is seen during polysomnography).³¹

The multiple sleep latency test has an imperfect sensitivity, though, and should be repeated when there is a high suspicion of narcolepsy.^32–34 It is not completely specific either, and false-positive results occur. In fact, SOREMPs can be seen in the general population, particularly in those with a circadian rhythm disorder, insufficient sleep, or sleep-disordered breathing. Two or more SOREMPs in an multiple sleep latency test can be seen in a small proportion of the general population.³⁵ The results of a multiple sleep latency test should be interpreted in the clinical context.

Differential diagnosis

Narcolepsy type 1 is distinguished from type 2 by the presence of cataplexy. A cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin 1 level of 110 pg/mL or less, or less than one-third of the mean value obtained in normal individuals, can substitute for the multiple sleep latency test in diagnosing narcolepsy type 1.³¹ Currently, hypocretin testing is generally not performed in clinical practice, although it may become a routine part of the narcolepsy evaluation in the future.

Thus, according to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, 3rd edition,³¹ the diagnosis of narcolepsy type 1 requires excessive daytime sleepiness for at least 3 months that cannot be explained by another sleep disorder, medical or neurologic disorder, mental disorder, medication use, or substance use disorder, and at least 1 of the following:

• Cataplexy and mean sleep latency of 8 minutes or less with at least 2 SOREMPs on multiple sleep latency testing (1 of which can be on the preceding night’s polysomography)
• Cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin 1 levels less than 110 pg/mL or one-third the baseline normal levels and mean sleep latency ≤ 8 minutes with ≥ 2 SOREMPs on multiple sleep latency testing.

Similarly, the diagnosis of narcolepsy type 2 requires excessive daytime sleepiness for at least 3 months that cannot be explained by another sleep disorder, medical or neurological disorder, mental disorder, medication use, or substance use disorder, plus:

• Mean sleep latency of 8 minutes or less with at least 2 SOREMPs on multiple sleep latency testing.

Idiopathic hypersomnia, another disorder of central hypersomnolence, is also characterized by disabling sleepiness. It is diagnostically differentiated from narcolepsy, as there are fewer than 2 SOREMPs. As opposed to narcolepsy, in which naps tend to be refreshing, even prolonged naps in idiopathic hypersomnia are often not helpful in restoring wakefulness. In idiopathic hypersomnia, sleep is usually not fragmented, and there are few nocturnal arousals. Sleep times can often be prolonged as well, whereas in narcolepsy total sleep time through the day may not be increased but is not consolidated.

Kleine-Levin syndrome is a rarer disorder of hypersomnia. It is episodic compared with the relatively persistent sleepiness in narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia. Periods of hypersomnia occur intermittently for days to weeks and are accompanied by cognitive and behavioral changes including hyperphagia and hypersexuality.⁴

LINKED TO HYPOCRETIN DEFICIENCY

Over the past 2 decades, the underlying pathophysiology of narcolepsy type 1 has been better characterized.

Narcolepsy type 1 has been linked to a deficiency in hypocretin in the central nervous system.³⁶ Hypocretin (also known as orexin) is a hormone produced in the hypothalamus that acts on multiple brain regions and maintains alertness. For unclear reasons, hypothalamic neurons producing hypocretin are selectively reduced in narcolepsy type 1. Hypocretin also stabilizes wakefulness and inhibits REM sleep; therefore, hypocretin deficiency can lead to inappropriate intrusions of REM sleep onto wakefulness, leading to the hallmark features of narcolepsy—cataplexy, sleep-related hallucinations, and sleep paralysis.³⁷ According to one theory, cataplexy is triggered by emotional stimuli because of a pathway between the medial prefrontal cortex and the amygdala to the pons.³⁸

Cerebrospinal fluid levels of hypocretin in patients with narcolepsy type 2 tend to be normal, and the biologic underpinnings of narcolepsy type 2 remain mysterious. However, in the subgroup of those with narcolepsy type 2 in which hypocretin is low, many individuals go on to develop cataplexy, thereby evolving to narcolepsy type 1.³⁶

POSSIBLE AUTOIMMUNE BASIS

Narcolepsy is typically a sporadic disorder, although familial cases have been described. The risk of a parent with narcolepsy having a child who is affected is approximately 1%.⁵

Narcolepsy type 1 is strongly associated with HLA-DQB1*0602, with up to 95% of those affected having at least one allele.³⁹ Having 2 copies of the allele further increases the risk of developing narcolepsy.⁴⁰ However, this allele is far from specific for narcolepsy with cataplexy, as it occurs in 12% to 38% of the general population.⁴¹ Therefore, HLA typing currently has limited clinical utility. The exact cause is as yet unknown, but substantial literature proposes an autoimmune basis of the disorder, given the strong association with the HLA subtype.^42–44

After the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, there was a significant increase in the incidence of narcolepsy with cataplexy, which again sparked interest in an autoimmune etiology underlying the disorder. Pandemrix, an H1N1 vaccine produced as a result of the 2009 pandemic, appeared to also be associated with an increase in the incidence of narcolepsy. An association with other upper respiratory infections has also been noted, further supporting a possible autoimmune basis.

A few studies have looked for serum autoantibodies involved in the pathogenesis of narcolepsy. Thus far, only one has been identified, an antibody to Tribbles homolog 2, found in 20% to 40% of those with new onset of nar-colepsy.^42–44

TREATMENTS FOR DAYTIME SLEEPINESS

As with many chronic disorders, the treatment of narcolepsy consists of symptomatic rather than curative management, which can be done through both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic means.

Nondrug measures

Scheduled naps lasting 15 to 20 minutes can help improve alertness.⁴⁵ A consistent sleep schedule with good sleep hygiene, ensuring sufficient nightly sleep, is also important. In one study, the combination of scheduled naps and regular nocturnal sleep times reduced the level of daytime sleepiness and unintentional daytime sleep. Daytime naps were most helpful for those with the highest degree of daytime sleepiness.⁴⁵

Strategic use of caffeine can be helpful and can reduce dependence on pharmacologic treatment.

Screening should be performed routinely for other sleep disorders, such as sleep-disordered breathing, which should be treated if identified.^5,18 When being treated for other medical conditions, individuals with narcolepsy should avoid medications that can cause sedation, such as opiates or barbiturates; alcohol should be minimized or avoided.

Networking with other individuals with narcolepsy through support groups such as Narcolepsy Network can be valuable for learning coping skills and connecting with community resources. Psychological counseling for the patient, and sometimes the family, can also be useful. School-age children may need special accommodations such as schedule adjustments to allow for scheduled naps or frequent breaks to maintain alertness.

People with narcolepsy tend to function better in careers that do not require long periods of sitting, as sleepiness tends to be worse, but instead offer flexibility and require higher levels of activity that tend to combat sleepiness. They should not work as commercial drivers.¹⁸

While behavioral interventions in narcolepsy are vital, they are rarely sufficient, and drugs that promote daytime wakefulness are used as an adjunct (Table 2).⁴⁶

Realistic expectations should be established when starting, as some degree of residual sleepiness usually remains even with optimal medical therapy. Medications should be strategically scheduled to maximize alertness during necessary times such as at work or school or during driving. Patients should specifically be counseled to avoid driving if sleepy.^18,47

Modafinil is often used as a first-line therapy, given its favorable side-effect profile and low potential for abuse. Its pharmacologic action has been debated but it probably acts as a selective dopamine reuptake inhibitor. It is typically taken twice daily (upon waking and early afternoon) and is usually well tolerated.

Potential side effects include headache, nausea, dry mouth, anorexia, diarrhea, and, rarely, Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Cardiovascular side effects are minimal, making it a favorable choice in older patients.^18,48

A trial in 283 patients showed significantly lower levels of sleepiness in patients taking modafinil 200 mg or 400 mg than in a control group. Other trials have supported these findings and showed improved driving performance on modafinil.¹⁸

Notably, modafinil can increase the metabolism of oral contraceptives, thereby reducing their efficacy. Women of childbearing age should be warned about this interaction and should be transitioned to nonhormonal forms of contraception.^2,47

Armodafinil, a purified R-isomer of modafinil, has a longer half-life and requires only once-daily dosing.⁵

If modafinil or armodafinil fails to optimally manage daytime sleepiness, a traditional stimulant such as methylphenidate or an amphetamine is often used.

Methylphenidate and amphetamines primarily inhibit the reuptake and increase the release of the monoamines, mainly dopamine, and to a lesser degree serotonin and norepinephrine.

These drugs have more significant adverse effects that can involve the cardiovascular system, causing hypertension and arrhythmias. Anorexia, weight loss, and, particularly with high doses, psychosis can occur.⁴⁹

These drugs should be avoided in patients with a history of significant cardiovascular disease. Before starting stimulant therapy, a thorough cardiovascular examination should be done, often including electrocardiography to ensure there is no baseline arrhythmia.

Patients on these medications should be followed closely to ensure that blood pressure, pulse, and weight are not negatively affected.^18,50 Addiction and tolerance can develop with these drugs, and follow-up should include assessment for dependence. Some states may require prescription drug monitoring to ensure the drugs are not being abused or diverted.

Short- and long-acting formulations of both methylphenidate and amphetamines are available, and a long-acting form is often used in conjunction with a short-acting form as needed.¹⁸

Addiction and drug-seeking behavior can develop but are unusual in those taking stimulants to treat narcolepsy.⁴⁹

Follow-up

Residual daytime sleepiness can be measured subjectively through the Epworth Sleepiness Scale on follow-up. If necessary, a maintenance-of-wakefulness test can provide an objective assessment of treatment efficacy.¹⁸

As narcolepsy is a chronic disorder, treatment should evolve with time. Most medications that treat narcolepsy are categorized by the US Food and Drug Administration as pregnancy category C, as we do not have adequate studies in human pregnancies to evaluate their effects. When a patient with narcolepsy becomes pregnant, she should be counseled about the risks and benefits of remaining on therapy. Treatment should balance the risks of sleepiness with the potential risks of remaining on medications.⁵⁰ In the elderly, as cardiovascular comorbidities tend to increase, the risks and benefits of therapy should be routinely reevaluated.

For cataplexy

Sodium oxybate,^51–53 the most potent anticataplectic drug, is the sodium salt of gamma hydroxybutyrate, a metabolite of gamma-aminobutyric acid. Sodium oxybate can be prescribed in the United States, Canada, and Europe. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine recommends sodium oxybate for cataplexy, daytime sleepiness, and disrupted sleep based on 3 level-1 studies and 2 level-4 studies.⁴⁶

Sodium oxybate increases slow-wave sleep, improves sleep continuity, and often helps to mitigate daytime sleepiness. Due to its short half-life, its administration is unusual: the first dose is taken before bedtime and the second dose 2.5 to 4 hours later. Some patients set an alarm clock to take the second dose, while others awaken spontaneously to take the second dose. Most patients find that with adherence to dosing and safety instructions, sodium oxybate can serve as a highly effective form of treatment of both excessive sleepiness and cataplexy and may reduce the need for stimulant-based therapies.

The most common adverse effects are nausea, mood swings, and enuresis. Occasionally, psychosis can result and limit use of the drug. Obstructive sleep apnea can also develop or worsen.⁵² Because of its high salt content, sodium oxybate should be used with caution in those with heart failure, hypertension, or renal impairment. Its relative, gamma hydroxybutyrate, causes rapid sedation and has been notorious for illegal use as a date rape drug.

In the United States, sodium oxybate is distributed only through a central pharmacy to mitigate potential abuse. Due to this system, the rates of diversion are extremely low, estimated in a postmarketing analysis to be 1 instance per 5,200 patients treated. In the same study, abuse and dependence were both rare as well, about 1 case for every 2,600 and 6,500 patients treated.^6,18,52,53

Antidepressants promote the action of norepinephrine and, to a lesser degree, serotonin, thereby suppressing REM sleep.

Venlafaxine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is often used as a first-line treatment for cataplexy. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as fluoxetine are also used with success. Tricyclic antidepressants such as protriptyline or clomipramine are extremely effective for cataplexy, but are rarely used due to their adverse effects.^2,47

FUTURE WORK

While our understanding of narcolepsy has advanced, there are still gaps in our knowledge of the disorder—namely, the specific trigger for the loss of hypocretin neurons in type 1 narcolepsy and the underlying pathophysiology of type 2.

A number of emerging therapies target the hypocretin system, including peptide replacement, neuronal transplant, and immunotherapy preventing hypocretin neuronal cell death.^50,54,55 Additional drugs designed to improve alertness that do not involve the hypocretin system are also being developed, including a histamine inverse agonist.^50,56 Sodium oxybate and modafinil, although currently approved for use in adults, are still off-label in pediatric practice. Studies of the safety and efficacy of these medications in children are needed.^7,57

Vasovagal syncope is usually benign, and although it often recurs, increasing fluid and salt intake and performing counter-pressure maneuvers are usually sufficient.¹ However, if patients continue to have syncopal episodes despite these first-line measures, other options include drug therapy with midodrine, fludrocortisone, beta-blockers, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; orthostatic training; and, in some cases, pacemaker implantation. The 2017 guidelines from the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and Heart Rhythm Society (ACC/AHA/HRS) are helpful in the management of these patients.¹

RATIONALE

Although vasovagal syncope is considered benign, it can result in injury and can significantly affect quality of life.

The diagnosis can often be established in the initial evaluation with a structured history, physical examination, and electrocardiography. If the diagnosis is still unclear, tilt-table testing can be useful and has an ACC/AHA/HRS class IIa (moderate) recommendation.¹ Once the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope is made, first-line measures can be instituted.

FIRST-LINE MEASURES

An explanation of the diagnosis, education on avoiding triggers such as prolonged standing and warm environments, coping with potentially stressful visits to the doctor or dentist, and reassurance that the condition is benign are all strongly recommended (class I).¹

Initial measures include performing physical counter-pressure maneuvers (class IIa), increasing salt and fluid intake (class IIb) in the absence of contraindications, and, in selected patients, reducing or withdrawing hypotensive medications when appropriate (class IIb).

Physical counter-pressure maneuvers are recommended for patients whose syncopal episodes have a sufficiently long prodromal period. Maneuvers include the following:

• Leg crossing: crossing the legs while tensing leg, abdominal, and buttock muscles
• Handgrip: maximally contracting a rubber ball or other object in the dominant hand
• Squatting
• Limb or abdominal contractions
• Arm tensing: contracting both arms by gripping one hand with the other and abducting both arms.²

The effectiveness of counter-pressure maneuvers was studied by van Dijk et al² in a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial that included 223 patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope associated with prodromal symptoms. They concluded that these maneuvers decreased the recurrence of syncopal episodes, with a relative risk reduction of 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.11–0.53, P < .005) and were low-cost and risk-free.

Confirming the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope with tilt-table testing may reassure the patient. It can also help the patient learn to identify the symptoms associated with a vasovagal episode, which in turn may encourage timely use of physical counter-pressure maneuvers at the onset.

The evidence for increasing salt and fluid intake for patients with vasovagal syncope is limited. But in the absence of a contraindication such as hypertension, renal disease, or heart failure, it may be reasonable to encourage the ingestion of 2 L to 3 L of fluid per day and a total of 6 g to 9 g of salt per day (around 1 to 2 heaping teaspoons of salt).¹

In patients who continue to have syncopal episodes despite adequate use of first-line measures, medical therapy can be considered. Unfortunately, evidence supporting drug therapy for recurrent syncope is limited.³ Options include midodrine (class IIa), fludrocortisone (class IIb), beta-blockers (class IIb), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (class IIb).¹

Midodrine has the strongest recommendation and is a reasonable option if there is no history of hypertension, heart failure, or urinary retention. It is a peripheral alpha-agonist that ameliorates the reduction in peripheral sympathetic neural outflow responsible for venous pooling and vasodepression in vasovagal syncope.^4–6

Fludrocortisone results in increased blood volume due to mineralocorticoid activity. In the Prevention of Syncope Trial 2 of fludrocortisone vs placebo, patients on fludrocortisone had a “marginally nonsignificant” reduction in recurrence of syncope over 1 year (hazard ratio 0.69, P = .069).⁷

Overall, beta-blockers have failed to prevent syncope in randomized controlled trials. But in a meta-analysis that included patients from the Prevention of Syncope Trial,⁸ an age-dependent benefit of beta-blockers was noted in patients age 42 and older.⁹ Therefore, a beta-blocker may be a reasonable option in patients in this age group with recurrent vasovagal syncope.¹

Serotonin has central effects on blood pressure and heart rate that can induce syncope. However, evidence for the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the prevention of recurrent vasovagal syncope has been contradictory in small trials.^10,11

When choosing a drug, contraindications should be considered, including possible effects during pregnancy in women of childbearing age.

OTHER MEASURES

Orthostatic training, with repetitive tilt-table testing until a test is negative, or with daily standing quietly against a wall for prolonged periods of time, has not been shown to have sustained benefit in reducing the recurrence of syncopal episodes (class IIb recommendation).¹

Dual-chamber pacing can be considered in carefully selected patients age 40 or older with syncope and documented asystole of at least 3 seconds or spontaneous pauses of at least 6 seconds without syncope on implantable loop recorder monitoring (class IIb recommendation).^1,12,13 Strict patient selection increases the likelihood that pacing will be effective.¹ For example, patients with documented asystole during syncope and a tilt-table test that induces minimal or no vasodepressor response are more likely to respond than patients with a positive tilt-table test with a vasodepressor (hypotensive) response.¹³

Tilt-table testing may also be considered to identify patients with a hypotensive response who would be less likely to respond to permanent cardiac pacing.¹⁴ 


Compression garments carry a class IIa recommendation for orthostatic hypotension,1 but they have not been adequately studied in vasovagal syncope.

Vasovagal syncope is usually benign, and although it often recurs, increasing fluid and salt intake and performing counter-pressure maneuvers are usually sufficient.¹ However, if patients continue to have syncopal episodes despite these first-line measures, other options include drug therapy with midodrine, fludrocortisone, beta-blockers, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; orthostatic training; and, in some cases, pacemaker implantation. The 2017 guidelines from the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and Heart Rhythm Society (ACC/AHA/HRS) are helpful in the management of these patients.¹

RATIONALE

Although vasovagal syncope is considered benign, it can result in injury and can significantly affect quality of life.

The diagnosis can often be established in the initial evaluation with a structured history, physical examination, and electrocardiography. If the diagnosis is still unclear, tilt-table testing can be useful and has an ACC/AHA/HRS class IIa (moderate) recommendation.¹ Once the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope is made, first-line measures can be instituted.

FIRST-LINE MEASURES

An explanation of the diagnosis, education on avoiding triggers such as prolonged standing and warm environments, coping with potentially stressful visits to the doctor or dentist, and reassurance that the condition is benign are all strongly recommended (class I).¹

Initial measures include performing physical counter-pressure maneuvers (class IIa), increasing salt and fluid intake (class IIb) in the absence of contraindications, and, in selected patients, reducing or withdrawing hypotensive medications when appropriate (class IIb).

Physical counter-pressure maneuvers are recommended for patients whose syncopal episodes have a sufficiently long prodromal period. Maneuvers include the following:

• Leg crossing: crossing the legs while tensing leg, abdominal, and buttock muscles
• Handgrip: maximally contracting a rubber ball or other object in the dominant hand
• Squatting
• Limb or abdominal contractions
• Arm tensing: contracting both arms by gripping one hand with the other and abducting both arms.²

The effectiveness of counter-pressure maneuvers was studied by van Dijk et al² in a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial that included 223 patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope associated with prodromal symptoms. They concluded that these maneuvers decreased the recurrence of syncopal episodes, with a relative risk reduction of 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.11–0.53, P < .005) and were low-cost and risk-free.

Confirming the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope with tilt-table testing may reassure the patient. It can also help the patient learn to identify the symptoms associated with a vasovagal episode, which in turn may encourage timely use of physical counter-pressure maneuvers at the onset.

The evidence for increasing salt and fluid intake for patients with vasovagal syncope is limited. But in the absence of a contraindication such as hypertension, renal disease, or heart failure, it may be reasonable to encourage the ingestion of 2 L to 3 L of fluid per day and a total of 6 g to 9 g of salt per day (around 1 to 2 heaping teaspoons of salt).¹

In patients who continue to have syncopal episodes despite adequate use of first-line measures, medical therapy can be considered. Unfortunately, evidence supporting drug therapy for recurrent syncope is limited.³ Options include midodrine (class IIa), fludrocortisone (class IIb), beta-blockers (class IIb), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (class IIb).¹

Midodrine has the strongest recommendation and is a reasonable option if there is no history of hypertension, heart failure, or urinary retention. It is a peripheral alpha-agonist that ameliorates the reduction in peripheral sympathetic neural outflow responsible for venous pooling and vasodepression in vasovagal syncope.^4–6

Fludrocortisone results in increased blood volume due to mineralocorticoid activity. In the Prevention of Syncope Trial 2 of fludrocortisone vs placebo, patients on fludrocortisone had a “marginally nonsignificant” reduction in recurrence of syncope over 1 year (hazard ratio 0.69, P = .069).⁷

Overall, beta-blockers have failed to prevent syncope in randomized controlled trials. But in a meta-analysis that included patients from the Prevention of Syncope Trial,⁸ an age-dependent benefit of beta-blockers was noted in patients age 42 and older.⁹ Therefore, a beta-blocker may be a reasonable option in patients in this age group with recurrent vasovagal syncope.¹

Serotonin has central effects on blood pressure and heart rate that can induce syncope. However, evidence for the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the prevention of recurrent vasovagal syncope has been contradictory in small trials.^10,11

When choosing a drug, contraindications should be considered, including possible effects during pregnancy in women of childbearing age.

OTHER MEASURES

Orthostatic training, with repetitive tilt-table testing until a test is negative, or with daily standing quietly against a wall for prolonged periods of time, has not been shown to have sustained benefit in reducing the recurrence of syncopal episodes (class IIb recommendation).¹

Dual-chamber pacing can be considered in carefully selected patients age 40 or older with syncope and documented asystole of at least 3 seconds or spontaneous pauses of at least 6 seconds without syncope on implantable loop recorder monitoring (class IIb recommendation).^1,12,13 Strict patient selection increases the likelihood that pacing will be effective.¹ For example, patients with documented asystole during syncope and a tilt-table test that induces minimal or no vasodepressor response are more likely to respond than patients with a positive tilt-table test with a vasodepressor (hypotensive) response.¹³

Tilt-table testing may also be considered to identify patients with a hypotensive response who would be less likely to respond to permanent cardiac pacing.¹⁴ 


Compression garments carry a class IIa recommendation for orthostatic hypotension,1 but they have not been adequately studied in vasovagal syncope.

Vasovagal syncope is usually benign, and although it often recurs, increasing fluid and salt intake and performing counter-pressure maneuvers are usually sufficient.¹ However, if patients continue to have syncopal episodes despite these first-line measures, other options include drug therapy with midodrine, fludrocortisone, beta-blockers, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; orthostatic training; and, in some cases, pacemaker implantation. The 2017 guidelines from the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and Heart Rhythm Society (ACC/AHA/HRS) are helpful in the management of these patients.¹

RATIONALE

Although vasovagal syncope is considered benign, it can result in injury and can significantly affect quality of life.

The diagnosis can often be established in the initial evaluation with a structured history, physical examination, and electrocardiography. If the diagnosis is still unclear, tilt-table testing can be useful and has an ACC/AHA/HRS class IIa (moderate) recommendation.¹ Once the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope is made, first-line measures can be instituted.

FIRST-LINE MEASURES

An explanation of the diagnosis, education on avoiding triggers such as prolonged standing and warm environments, coping with potentially stressful visits to the doctor or dentist, and reassurance that the condition is benign are all strongly recommended (class I).¹

Initial measures include performing physical counter-pressure maneuvers (class IIa), increasing salt and fluid intake (class IIb) in the absence of contraindications, and, in selected patients, reducing or withdrawing hypotensive medications when appropriate (class IIb).

Physical counter-pressure maneuvers are recommended for patients whose syncopal episodes have a sufficiently long prodromal period. Maneuvers include the following:

• Leg crossing: crossing the legs while tensing leg, abdominal, and buttock muscles
• Handgrip: maximally contracting a rubber ball or other object in the dominant hand
• Squatting
• Limb or abdominal contractions
• Arm tensing: contracting both arms by gripping one hand with the other and abducting both arms.²

The effectiveness of counter-pressure maneuvers was studied by van Dijk et al² in a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial that included 223 patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope associated with prodromal symptoms. They concluded that these maneuvers decreased the recurrence of syncopal episodes, with a relative risk reduction of 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.11–0.53, P < .005) and were low-cost and risk-free.

Confirming the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope with tilt-table testing may reassure the patient. It can also help the patient learn to identify the symptoms associated with a vasovagal episode, which in turn may encourage timely use of physical counter-pressure maneuvers at the onset.

The evidence for increasing salt and fluid intake for patients with vasovagal syncope is limited. But in the absence of a contraindication such as hypertension, renal disease, or heart failure, it may be reasonable to encourage the ingestion of 2 L to 3 L of fluid per day and a total of 6 g to 9 g of salt per day (around 1 to 2 heaping teaspoons of salt).¹

In patients who continue to have syncopal episodes despite adequate use of first-line measures, medical therapy can be considered. Unfortunately, evidence supporting drug therapy for recurrent syncope is limited.³ Options include midodrine (class IIa), fludrocortisone (class IIb), beta-blockers (class IIb), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (class IIb).¹

Midodrine has the strongest recommendation and is a reasonable option if there is no history of hypertension, heart failure, or urinary retention. It is a peripheral alpha-agonist that ameliorates the reduction in peripheral sympathetic neural outflow responsible for venous pooling and vasodepression in vasovagal syncope.^4–6

Fludrocortisone results in increased blood volume due to mineralocorticoid activity. In the Prevention of Syncope Trial 2 of fludrocortisone vs placebo, patients on fludrocortisone had a “marginally nonsignificant” reduction in recurrence of syncope over 1 year (hazard ratio 0.69, P = .069).⁷

Overall, beta-blockers have failed to prevent syncope in randomized controlled trials. But in a meta-analysis that included patients from the Prevention of Syncope Trial,⁸ an age-dependent benefit of beta-blockers was noted in patients age 42 and older.⁹ Therefore, a beta-blocker may be a reasonable option in patients in this age group with recurrent vasovagal syncope.¹

Serotonin has central effects on blood pressure and heart rate that can induce syncope. However, evidence for the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the prevention of recurrent vasovagal syncope has been contradictory in small trials.^10,11

When choosing a drug, contraindications should be considered, including possible effects during pregnancy in women of childbearing age.

OTHER MEASURES

Orthostatic training, with repetitive tilt-table testing until a test is negative, or with daily standing quietly against a wall for prolonged periods of time, has not been shown to have sustained benefit in reducing the recurrence of syncopal episodes (class IIb recommendation).¹

Dual-chamber pacing can be considered in carefully selected patients age 40 or older with syncope and documented asystole of at least 3 seconds or spontaneous pauses of at least 6 seconds without syncope on implantable loop recorder monitoring (class IIb recommendation).^1,12,13 Strict patient selection increases the likelihood that pacing will be effective.¹ For example, patients with documented asystole during syncope and a tilt-table test that induces minimal or no vasodepressor response are more likely to respond than patients with a positive tilt-table test with a vasodepressor (hypotensive) response.¹³

Tilt-table testing may also be considered to identify patients with a hypotensive response who would be less likely to respond to permanent cardiac pacing.¹⁴ 


Compression garments carry a class IIa recommendation for orthostatic hypotension,1 but they have not been adequately studied in vasovagal syncope.

NEW ORLEANS – A self-management program that focused on medication adherence, sleep, nutrition, and stress reduction was associated with decreased seizures and improved quality of life for adults with epilepsy.

Michele Sullivan/MDedge News

SMART (Self‐management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events) also was associated with improved depression scores and overall quality of life measures in participants, compared with a wait-listed control group, Martha Sajatovic, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

“I believe what we’re seeing is a result of improved self-management,” said Dr. Sajatovic, the Willard Brown Chair in Neurological Outcomes Research at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland. “This is multimodal, including better medication adherence, which in turn is related to better communication with the clinician. For example, if patients are not sleeping well or their medicine makes them nauseated or they experience sexual dysfunction, we encourage them to talk to their docs about what they can live with, and what they can’t.”

Presented as a poster during the meeting, the SMART study was also published in Epilepsia.

SMART is an 8-week online educational program delivered by a nurse educator and a “peer educator,” a person with epilepsy who has had at least three negative health events. The first session is an in-person visit during which the team gets acquainted and discusses goals. The remaining sessions are self-paced and delivered on computer tablets provided by the investigators.

SMART didn’t just focus on the physical issues of living with epilepsy, Dr. Sajatovic said in an interview. Sessions also discussed the stigma still associated with the disorder, and myths that unnecessarily inflate perceptions. Discussions include goal setting, epilepsy complications and how to manage them, the importance of good sleep hygiene, problem-solving skills, nutrition and substance abuse, exercise, and how to deal with medication side effects.

“One thing we really stressed was sharing information in a way that was accessible to all patients and fostered self-motivation,” she said. “Most of our participants had never been in a program like this before. It was very empowering for many.”

The researchers chose participants who were socioeconomically challenged for this project; 88% made less than $25,000 per year and 74% were unemployed. The mean age of participants was 41 years, 70% were black, and most had been living with epilepsy at least half of their life. About 70% lived alone, and 70% had experienced at least one seizure within the month before enrolling. Mental health comorbidities were common; 69% had depression, 32% had anxiety, and 13% had PTSD.

The study enrolled 120 people, who were evenly divided between the intervention group and the wait-list group. The primary outcome was the change in total negative health events from baseline to the study’s end. Negative health events were seizures and ED or hospital admissions for any other causes including attempts at self-harm, falls, and accidents.

Secondary outcomes included changes in depression scores as measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Quality of life was measured using the 10-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy; functional status was measured using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey.

At baseline, the total mean 6-month negative health events count was 15, with 13 events being seizures. The other events were hospital or ED visits for other reasons.

At the end of the study, the intervention group experienced a significant mean decrease of 10 fewer negative health events, compared with a decrease of 2 in the wait-listed group. This was largely driven by a mean of 7.8 fewer seizures in the active group, compared with a decrease of about 1.0 in the wait-listed group. The 6-month ER and hospitalization counts did not significantly change.

Among the secondary outcomes, depression, overall health, and quality of life all improved significantly in the intervention group, compared with the wait-listed group. The intervention group also had significant decreases in depression measures and improvements in daily function measures, Dr. Sajatovic said.

“It was so gratifying to see this. Most of our participants had never been in a program like this before. It was a chance for them to take control of their epilepsy, instead of simply having it control them,” she said.

This study was supported by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. Sajatovic had no financial disclosures related to this presentation.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Sajatovic M et al. AES 2018, Abstract 1.218.

NEW ORLEANS – A self-management program that focused on medication adherence, sleep, nutrition, and stress reduction was associated with decreased seizures and improved quality of life for adults with epilepsy.

Michele Sullivan/MDedge News

SMART (Self‐management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events) also was associated with improved depression scores and overall quality of life measures in participants, compared with a wait-listed control group, Martha Sajatovic, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

“I believe what we’re seeing is a result of improved self-management,” said Dr. Sajatovic, the Willard Brown Chair in Neurological Outcomes Research at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland. “This is multimodal, including better medication adherence, which in turn is related to better communication with the clinician. For example, if patients are not sleeping well or their medicine makes them nauseated or they experience sexual dysfunction, we encourage them to talk to their docs about what they can live with, and what they can’t.”

Presented as a poster during the meeting, the SMART study was also published in Epilepsia.

SMART is an 8-week online educational program delivered by a nurse educator and a “peer educator,” a person with epilepsy who has had at least three negative health events. The first session is an in-person visit during which the team gets acquainted and discusses goals. The remaining sessions are self-paced and delivered on computer tablets provided by the investigators.

SMART didn’t just focus on the physical issues of living with epilepsy, Dr. Sajatovic said in an interview. Sessions also discussed the stigma still associated with the disorder, and myths that unnecessarily inflate perceptions. Discussions include goal setting, epilepsy complications and how to manage them, the importance of good sleep hygiene, problem-solving skills, nutrition and substance abuse, exercise, and how to deal with medication side effects.

“One thing we really stressed was sharing information in a way that was accessible to all patients and fostered self-motivation,” she said. “Most of our participants had never been in a program like this before. It was very empowering for many.”

The researchers chose participants who were socioeconomically challenged for this project; 88% made less than $25,000 per year and 74% were unemployed. The mean age of participants was 41 years, 70% were black, and most had been living with epilepsy at least half of their life. About 70% lived alone, and 70% had experienced at least one seizure within the month before enrolling. Mental health comorbidities were common; 69% had depression, 32% had anxiety, and 13% had PTSD.

The study enrolled 120 people, who were evenly divided between the intervention group and the wait-list group. The primary outcome was the change in total negative health events from baseline to the study’s end. Negative health events were seizures and ED or hospital admissions for any other causes including attempts at self-harm, falls, and accidents.

Secondary outcomes included changes in depression scores as measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Quality of life was measured using the 10-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy; functional status was measured using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey.

At baseline, the total mean 6-month negative health events count was 15, with 13 events being seizures. The other events were hospital or ED visits for other reasons.

At the end of the study, the intervention group experienced a significant mean decrease of 10 fewer negative health events, compared with a decrease of 2 in the wait-listed group. This was largely driven by a mean of 7.8 fewer seizures in the active group, compared with a decrease of about 1.0 in the wait-listed group. The 6-month ER and hospitalization counts did not significantly change.

Among the secondary outcomes, depression, overall health, and quality of life all improved significantly in the intervention group, compared with the wait-listed group. The intervention group also had significant decreases in depression measures and improvements in daily function measures, Dr. Sajatovic said.

“It was so gratifying to see this. Most of our participants had never been in a program like this before. It was a chance for them to take control of their epilepsy, instead of simply having it control them,” she said.

This study was supported by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. Sajatovic had no financial disclosures related to this presentation.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Sajatovic M et al. AES 2018, Abstract 1.218.

NEW ORLEANS – A self-management program that focused on medication adherence, sleep, nutrition, and stress reduction was associated with decreased seizures and improved quality of life for adults with epilepsy.

Michele Sullivan/MDedge News

SMART (Self‐management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events) also was associated with improved depression scores and overall quality of life measures in participants, compared with a wait-listed control group, Martha Sajatovic, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

“I believe what we’re seeing is a result of improved self-management,” said Dr. Sajatovic, the Willard Brown Chair in Neurological Outcomes Research at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland. “This is multimodal, including better medication adherence, which in turn is related to better communication with the clinician. For example, if patients are not sleeping well or their medicine makes them nauseated or they experience sexual dysfunction, we encourage them to talk to their docs about what they can live with, and what they can’t.”

Presented as a poster during the meeting, the SMART study was also published in Epilepsia.

SMART is an 8-week online educational program delivered by a nurse educator and a “peer educator,” a person with epilepsy who has had at least three negative health events. The first session is an in-person visit during which the team gets acquainted and discusses goals. The remaining sessions are self-paced and delivered on computer tablets provided by the investigators.

SMART didn’t just focus on the physical issues of living with epilepsy, Dr. Sajatovic said in an interview. Sessions also discussed the stigma still associated with the disorder, and myths that unnecessarily inflate perceptions. Discussions include goal setting, epilepsy complications and how to manage them, the importance of good sleep hygiene, problem-solving skills, nutrition and substance abuse, exercise, and how to deal with medication side effects.

“One thing we really stressed was sharing information in a way that was accessible to all patients and fostered self-motivation,” she said. “Most of our participants had never been in a program like this before. It was very empowering for many.”

The researchers chose participants who were socioeconomically challenged for this project; 88% made less than $25,000 per year and 74% were unemployed. The mean age of participants was 41 years, 70% were black, and most had been living with epilepsy at least half of their life. About 70% lived alone, and 70% had experienced at least one seizure within the month before enrolling. Mental health comorbidities were common; 69% had depression, 32% had anxiety, and 13% had PTSD.

The study enrolled 120 people, who were evenly divided between the intervention group and the wait-list group. The primary outcome was the change in total negative health events from baseline to the study’s end. Negative health events were seizures and ED or hospital admissions for any other causes including attempts at self-harm, falls, and accidents.

Secondary outcomes included changes in depression scores as measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Quality of life was measured using the 10-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy; functional status was measured using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey.

At baseline, the total mean 6-month negative health events count was 15, with 13 events being seizures. The other events were hospital or ED visits for other reasons.

At the end of the study, the intervention group experienced a significant mean decrease of 10 fewer negative health events, compared with a decrease of 2 in the wait-listed group. This was largely driven by a mean of 7.8 fewer seizures in the active group, compared with a decrease of about 1.0 in the wait-listed group. The 6-month ER and hospitalization counts did not significantly change.

Among the secondary outcomes, depression, overall health, and quality of life all improved significantly in the intervention group, compared with the wait-listed group. The intervention group also had significant decreases in depression measures and improvements in daily function measures, Dr. Sajatovic said.

“It was so gratifying to see this. Most of our participants had never been in a program like this before. It was a chance for them to take control of their epilepsy, instead of simply having it control them,” she said.

This study was supported by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. Sajatovic had no financial disclosures related to this presentation.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Sajatovic M et al. AES 2018, Abstract 1.218.

NEW ORLEANS – Risk for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) may change over time and yearly patient risk assessments are advisable, based on study results presented at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

Based on 3 years of data collected from over 12,000 people with epilepsy, 27.0% who had been at high risk (three or more generalized tonic-clonic seizures [GTCs] per year) at baseline moved out of the high-risk category. In addition, 32.5% at medium risk (one to two GTCs per year) at baseline changed categories. Finally, 7.0% in the low-risk category (no GTC seizures in the last year) at baseline moved to a higher-risk category.

“An individual’s risk [of SUDEP] is not set in stone,” said Neishay Ayub, MD, of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, who presented the data at the meeting. “Our findings support the recommendation that for people with epilepsy who have ongoing generalized tonic-clonic seizures, the goal of treatment is to reduce GTCs and thereby lower SUDEP risk.”

A 2017 practice guideline summary from the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society identified the presence and frequency of GTCs and absence of seizure freedom as risk factors for SUDEP. Using these measures, Dr. Ayub and colleagues sought to stratify patients according to their risk of SUDEP and monitor how risk changed over time. They collected information about more than 1.4 million seizures that occurred from December 2007 to February 2018 in 12,402 users of the electronic diary Seizure Tracker.

For each user, the researchers calculated the number of generalized seizures for each year since the initial seizure diary entry. They categorized each user as being at low, medium, or high risk of SUDEP during each year. Low risk was defined as no generalized seizures in a year. Medium risk was defined as one or two generalized seizures in a year. High risk was defined as three or more generalized seizures in a year.

“The next step would be to see if we can confirm this patient-reported data with an objective study to determine when seizures did or did not occur,” said Daniel Goldenholz, MD, PhD, also of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and senior author of the study. “For example, assessing information using new FDA [Food and Drug Administration]-approved wearable seizure tracker devices could give us a more comprehensive picture.”

The study was funded by the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Ayub N et al. AES 2018, Abstract 2.158.

NEW ORLEANS – Risk for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) may change over time and yearly patient risk assessments are advisable, based on study results presented at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

Based on 3 years of data collected from over 12,000 people with epilepsy, 27.0% who had been at high risk (three or more generalized tonic-clonic seizures [GTCs] per year) at baseline moved out of the high-risk category. In addition, 32.5% at medium risk (one to two GTCs per year) at baseline changed categories. Finally, 7.0% in the low-risk category (no GTC seizures in the last year) at baseline moved to a higher-risk category.

“An individual’s risk [of SUDEP] is not set in stone,” said Neishay Ayub, MD, of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, who presented the data at the meeting. “Our findings support the recommendation that for people with epilepsy who have ongoing generalized tonic-clonic seizures, the goal of treatment is to reduce GTCs and thereby lower SUDEP risk.”

A 2017 practice guideline summary from the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society identified the presence and frequency of GTCs and absence of seizure freedom as risk factors for SUDEP. Using these measures, Dr. Ayub and colleagues sought to stratify patients according to their risk of SUDEP and monitor how risk changed over time. They collected information about more than 1.4 million seizures that occurred from December 2007 to February 2018 in 12,402 users of the electronic diary Seizure Tracker.

For each user, the researchers calculated the number of generalized seizures for each year since the initial seizure diary entry. They categorized each user as being at low, medium, or high risk of SUDEP during each year. Low risk was defined as no generalized seizures in a year. Medium risk was defined as one or two generalized seizures in a year. High risk was defined as three or more generalized seizures in a year.

“The next step would be to see if we can confirm this patient-reported data with an objective study to determine when seizures did or did not occur,” said Daniel Goldenholz, MD, PhD, also of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and senior author of the study. “For example, assessing information using new FDA [Food and Drug Administration]-approved wearable seizure tracker devices could give us a more comprehensive picture.”

The study was funded by the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Ayub N et al. AES 2018, Abstract 2.158.

NEW ORLEANS – Risk for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) may change over time and yearly patient risk assessments are advisable, based on study results presented at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

Based on 3 years of data collected from over 12,000 people with epilepsy, 27.0% who had been at high risk (three or more generalized tonic-clonic seizures [GTCs] per year) at baseline moved out of the high-risk category. In addition, 32.5% at medium risk (one to two GTCs per year) at baseline changed categories. Finally, 7.0% in the low-risk category (no GTC seizures in the last year) at baseline moved to a higher-risk category.

“An individual’s risk [of SUDEP] is not set in stone,” said Neishay Ayub, MD, of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, who presented the data at the meeting. “Our findings support the recommendation that for people with epilepsy who have ongoing generalized tonic-clonic seizures, the goal of treatment is to reduce GTCs and thereby lower SUDEP risk.”

A 2017 practice guideline summary from the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society identified the presence and frequency of GTCs and absence of seizure freedom as risk factors for SUDEP. Using these measures, Dr. Ayub and colleagues sought to stratify patients according to their risk of SUDEP and monitor how risk changed over time. They collected information about more than 1.4 million seizures that occurred from December 2007 to February 2018 in 12,402 users of the electronic diary Seizure Tracker.

For each user, the researchers calculated the number of generalized seizures for each year since the initial seizure diary entry. They categorized each user as being at low, medium, or high risk of SUDEP during each year. Low risk was defined as no generalized seizures in a year. Medium risk was defined as one or two generalized seizures in a year. High risk was defined as three or more generalized seizures in a year.

“The next step would be to see if we can confirm this patient-reported data with an objective study to determine when seizures did or did not occur,” said Daniel Goldenholz, MD, PhD, also of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and senior author of the study. “For example, assessing information using new FDA [Food and Drug Administration]-approved wearable seizure tracker devices could give us a more comprehensive picture.”

The study was funded by the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Ayub N et al. AES 2018, Abstract 2.158.

NEW ORLEANS – Depression severity is correlated with seizure frequency and quality of life in adults with epilepsy, according to an analysis presented at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

The conclusion comes from a study of 120 people with epilepsy, 62 of whom had at least moderate depression based on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM-R), Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-10) and Charlson Comorbidity Index were used to assess patients’ health literacy, quality of life, and medical comorbidity, respectively

Among demographic characteristics, only inability to work was significantly associated with depression severity. Higher 30-day seizure frequency, panic disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder were correlated with more severe depression severity. Medical comorbidity was not associated with increased risk of depression.

Identifying and treating psychiatric comorbidities should be part of the management of patients with epilepsy, said Martha X. Sajatovic, MD, director of the Neurological and Behavioral Outcomes Center at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, who presented the data. “Following up to ensure they receive treatment is vital, because it can truly change patient outcomes and help them achieve their best quality of life.”

The study findings are consistent with those of previous research indicating that people with symptoms of depression are more likely to have more frequent seizures and decreased quality of life, said Dr. Sajatovic.

“Health care providers should screen their epilepsy patients for depression, but they shouldn’t stop there,” she advised. “A person may have depressive symptoms that don’t reach the level of depression but should be assessed for other types of mental health issues that could easily be overlooked.”

Patients with epilepsy should respond to the PHQ-9 annually, or more frequently, if warranted, she added.

“It’s important that people with epilepsy who have depression or other mental health issues get treatment such as cognitive behavioral therapy and medication,” said Dr. Sajatovic. “Even being in a self-management program helps, because the better they are at self management, the less likely they are to suffer negative health effects.”

This study was supported by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention SIP 14-007 1U48DP005030.
 

[email protected]

SOURCE: Kumar N et al. AES 2018, Abstract 1.371.

NEW ORLEANS – Depression severity is correlated with seizure frequency and quality of life in adults with epilepsy, according to an analysis presented at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

The conclusion comes from a study of 120 people with epilepsy, 62 of whom had at least moderate depression based on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM-R), Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-10) and Charlson Comorbidity Index were used to assess patients’ health literacy, quality of life, and medical comorbidity, respectively

Among demographic characteristics, only inability to work was significantly associated with depression severity. Higher 30-day seizure frequency, panic disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder were correlated with more severe depression severity. Medical comorbidity was not associated with increased risk of depression.

Identifying and treating psychiatric comorbidities should be part of the management of patients with epilepsy, said Martha X. Sajatovic, MD, director of the Neurological and Behavioral Outcomes Center at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, who presented the data. “Following up to ensure they receive treatment is vital, because it can truly change patient outcomes and help them achieve their best quality of life.”

The study findings are consistent with those of previous research indicating that people with symptoms of depression are more likely to have more frequent seizures and decreased quality of life, said Dr. Sajatovic.

“Health care providers should screen their epilepsy patients for depression, but they shouldn’t stop there,” she advised. “A person may have depressive symptoms that don’t reach the level of depression but should be assessed for other types of mental health issues that could easily be overlooked.”

Patients with epilepsy should respond to the PHQ-9 annually, or more frequently, if warranted, she added.

“It’s important that people with epilepsy who have depression or other mental health issues get treatment such as cognitive behavioral therapy and medication,” said Dr. Sajatovic. “Even being in a self-management program helps, because the better they are at self management, the less likely they are to suffer negative health effects.”

This study was supported by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention SIP 14-007 1U48DP005030.
 

[email protected]

SOURCE: Kumar N et al. AES 2018, Abstract 1.371.

NEW ORLEANS – Depression severity is correlated with seizure frequency and quality of life in adults with epilepsy, according to an analysis presented at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

The conclusion comes from a study of 120 people with epilepsy, 62 of whom had at least moderate depression based on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM-R), Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-10) and Charlson Comorbidity Index were used to assess patients’ health literacy, quality of life, and medical comorbidity, respectively

Among demographic characteristics, only inability to work was significantly associated with depression severity. Higher 30-day seizure frequency, panic disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder were correlated with more severe depression severity. Medical comorbidity was not associated with increased risk of depression.

Identifying and treating psychiatric comorbidities should be part of the management of patients with epilepsy, said Martha X. Sajatovic, MD, director of the Neurological and Behavioral Outcomes Center at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, who presented the data. “Following up to ensure they receive treatment is vital, because it can truly change patient outcomes and help them achieve their best quality of life.”

The study findings are consistent with those of previous research indicating that people with symptoms of depression are more likely to have more frequent seizures and decreased quality of life, said Dr. Sajatovic.

“Health care providers should screen their epilepsy patients for depression, but they shouldn’t stop there,” she advised. “A person may have depressive symptoms that don’t reach the level of depression but should be assessed for other types of mental health issues that could easily be overlooked.”

Patients with epilepsy should respond to the PHQ-9 annually, or more frequently, if warranted, she added.

“It’s important that people with epilepsy who have depression or other mental health issues get treatment such as cognitive behavioral therapy and medication,” said Dr. Sajatovic. “Even being in a self-management program helps, because the better they are at self management, the less likely they are to suffer negative health effects.”

This study was supported by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention SIP 14-007 1U48DP005030.
 

[email protected]

SOURCE: Kumar N et al. AES 2018, Abstract 1.371.

NEW ORLEANS – Patients taking enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may require a clinically meaningful increase in their vitamin D doses to achieve the same 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) plasma levels as patients taking nonenzyme-inducing AEDs, based on a retrospective chart review presented at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

While patients receiving either type of AED had similar average 25(OH)D levels in the study (32.0 ng/mL in the enzyme-inducing AED group and 33.2 ng/mL in the noninducing AED group), those in the enzyme-inducing group required 1,587 U/day to meet the goal – a 409-unit increase in dose, compared with the 1,108 U/day dose taken by patients in the nonenzyme-inducing group.

“Patients taking enzyme-inducing AEDs may benefit from more intensive monitoring of their vitamin D supplementation, and clinicians should anticipate this likely pharmacokinetic interaction,” said Barry E. Gidal, PharmD, professor of pharmacy and neurology at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and his colleagues.

Researchers have suggested that enzyme-inducing AEDs may affect CYP450 isoenzymes, increase vitamin D metabolism, and reduce 25(OH)D plasma levels. “It follows … that a potential pharmacokinetic interaction could exist between enzyme-inducing AEDs and oral formulations of vitamin D used for supplementation,” the investigators said.

To test the hypothesis, Dr. Gidal and his colleagues reviewed the charts of patients with epilepsy who were on any AED regimen and were prescribed vitamin D at William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital in Madison, Wisconsin, between January 2013 and September 2017.

The researchers grouped patients by those using enzyme-inducing AEDs and those taking noninducing AEDs. Patients who were taking AEDs in both categories were placed in the enzyme-inducing AED group. Patients with malabsorptive conditions and patients using calcitriol were excluded from the analysis.

Data included AEDs used, prescription and over-the-counter vitamin D use, 25(OH)D plasma concentration, renal function, age, gender, and ethnicity. Patients’ 25(OH)D levels were measured using a chemiluminescence immunoassay, and a minimum 25(OH)D plasma level of 30 ng/mL was the therapeutic goal.

The multivariant analysis was adjusted for potentially confounding variables including 25(OH)D concentration, over-the-counter vitamin D use, chronic kidney disease, age, gender, and ethnicity.

The analysis included 1,113 observations from 315 patients, and 263 of the observations (23.6%) were in the enzyme-inducing AED group. The enzyme-inducing group and noninducing groups were mostly male (90.5% and 91.8%, respectively) and similar in average age (65.9 and 61.4 years, respectively). Variables were evenly distributed between the groups, with the exceptions of chronic kidney disease, which was less common in the enzyme-inducing group (6.1% vs. 13.8%), and ethnicity (78.7% Caucasian in the enzyme-inducing group vs. 87.7% Caucasian in the noninducing group). The most common enzyme-inducing AED was phenytoin (50.6%), followed by carbamazepine (31.9%), phenobarbital (14.1%), oxcarbazepine (6.8%), primidone (1.9%), and eslicarbazepine (0.8%).

Dr. Gidal reported honoraria from Eisai, Sunovion, Lundbeck, and GW Pharmaceuticals.
 

[email protected]

SOURCE: Gidal BE et al. AES 2018, Abstract 1.315.

NEW ORLEANS – Patients taking enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may require a clinically meaningful increase in their vitamin D doses to achieve the same 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) plasma levels as patients taking nonenzyme-inducing AEDs, based on a retrospective chart review presented at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

While patients receiving either type of AED had similar average 25(OH)D levels in the study (32.0 ng/mL in the enzyme-inducing AED group and 33.2 ng/mL in the noninducing AED group), those in the enzyme-inducing group required 1,587 U/day to meet the goal – a 409-unit increase in dose, compared with the 1,108 U/day dose taken by patients in the nonenzyme-inducing group.

“Patients taking enzyme-inducing AEDs may benefit from more intensive monitoring of their vitamin D supplementation, and clinicians should anticipate this likely pharmacokinetic interaction,” said Barry E. Gidal, PharmD, professor of pharmacy and neurology at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and his colleagues.

Researchers have suggested that enzyme-inducing AEDs may affect CYP450 isoenzymes, increase vitamin D metabolism, and reduce 25(OH)D plasma levels. “It follows … that a potential pharmacokinetic interaction could exist between enzyme-inducing AEDs and oral formulations of vitamin D used for supplementation,” the investigators said.

To test the hypothesis, Dr. Gidal and his colleagues reviewed the charts of patients with epilepsy who were on any AED regimen and were prescribed vitamin D at William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital in Madison, Wisconsin, between January 2013 and September 2017.

The researchers grouped patients by those using enzyme-inducing AEDs and those taking noninducing AEDs. Patients who were taking AEDs in both categories were placed in the enzyme-inducing AED group. Patients with malabsorptive conditions and patients using calcitriol were excluded from the analysis.

Data included AEDs used, prescription and over-the-counter vitamin D use, 25(OH)D plasma concentration, renal function, age, gender, and ethnicity. Patients’ 25(OH)D levels were measured using a chemiluminescence immunoassay, and a minimum 25(OH)D plasma level of 30 ng/mL was the therapeutic goal.

The multivariant analysis was adjusted for potentially confounding variables including 25(OH)D concentration, over-the-counter vitamin D use, chronic kidney disease, age, gender, and ethnicity.

The analysis included 1,113 observations from 315 patients, and 263 of the observations (23.6%) were in the enzyme-inducing AED group. The enzyme-inducing group and noninducing groups were mostly male (90.5% and 91.8%, respectively) and similar in average age (65.9 and 61.4 years, respectively). Variables were evenly distributed between the groups, with the exceptions of chronic kidney disease, which was less common in the enzyme-inducing group (6.1% vs. 13.8%), and ethnicity (78.7% Caucasian in the enzyme-inducing group vs. 87.7% Caucasian in the noninducing group). The most common enzyme-inducing AED was phenytoin (50.6%), followed by carbamazepine (31.9%), phenobarbital (14.1%), oxcarbazepine (6.8%), primidone (1.9%), and eslicarbazepine (0.8%).

Dr. Gidal reported honoraria from Eisai, Sunovion, Lundbeck, and GW Pharmaceuticals.
 

[email protected]

SOURCE: Gidal BE et al. AES 2018, Abstract 1.315.

NEW ORLEANS – Patients taking enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may require a clinically meaningful increase in their vitamin D doses to achieve the same 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) plasma levels as patients taking nonenzyme-inducing AEDs, based on a retrospective chart review presented at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

While patients receiving either type of AED had similar average 25(OH)D levels in the study (32.0 ng/mL in the enzyme-inducing AED group and 33.2 ng/mL in the noninducing AED group), those in the enzyme-inducing group required 1,587 U/day to meet the goal – a 409-unit increase in dose, compared with the 1,108 U/day dose taken by patients in the nonenzyme-inducing group.

“Patients taking enzyme-inducing AEDs may benefit from more intensive monitoring of their vitamin D supplementation, and clinicians should anticipate this likely pharmacokinetic interaction,” said Barry E. Gidal, PharmD, professor of pharmacy and neurology at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and his colleagues.

Researchers have suggested that enzyme-inducing AEDs may affect CYP450 isoenzymes, increase vitamin D metabolism, and reduce 25(OH)D plasma levels. “It follows … that a potential pharmacokinetic interaction could exist between enzyme-inducing AEDs and oral formulations of vitamin D used for supplementation,” the investigators said.

To test the hypothesis, Dr. Gidal and his colleagues reviewed the charts of patients with epilepsy who were on any AED regimen and were prescribed vitamin D at William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital in Madison, Wisconsin, between January 2013 and September 2017.

The researchers grouped patients by those using enzyme-inducing AEDs and those taking noninducing AEDs. Patients who were taking AEDs in both categories were placed in the enzyme-inducing AED group. Patients with malabsorptive conditions and patients using calcitriol were excluded from the analysis.

Data included AEDs used, prescription and over-the-counter vitamin D use, 25(OH)D plasma concentration, renal function, age, gender, and ethnicity. Patients’ 25(OH)D levels were measured using a chemiluminescence immunoassay, and a minimum 25(OH)D plasma level of 30 ng/mL was the therapeutic goal.

The multivariant analysis was adjusted for potentially confounding variables including 25(OH)D concentration, over-the-counter vitamin D use, chronic kidney disease, age, gender, and ethnicity.

The analysis included 1,113 observations from 315 patients, and 263 of the observations (23.6%) were in the enzyme-inducing AED group. The enzyme-inducing group and noninducing groups were mostly male (90.5% and 91.8%, respectively) and similar in average age (65.9 and 61.4 years, respectively). Variables were evenly distributed between the groups, with the exceptions of chronic kidney disease, which was less common in the enzyme-inducing group (6.1% vs. 13.8%), and ethnicity (78.7% Caucasian in the enzyme-inducing group vs. 87.7% Caucasian in the noninducing group). The most common enzyme-inducing AED was phenytoin (50.6%), followed by carbamazepine (31.9%), phenobarbital (14.1%), oxcarbazepine (6.8%), primidone (1.9%), and eslicarbazepine (0.8%).

Dr. Gidal reported honoraria from Eisai, Sunovion, Lundbeck, and GW Pharmaceuticals.
 

[email protected]

SOURCE: Gidal BE et al. AES 2018, Abstract 1.315.

NEW ORLEANS – Clinicians should screen patients with pediatric epilepsy for depression regularly, according to research described at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society. Referral to a mental health provider is adequate for most patients with moderately severe symptoms of depression, but some patients may require active intervention during the clinical visit, said the researchers.

“We know that depression is more common in people with epilepsy, compared to the general population, but there is less information about depression in children and teens than adults, and little is known about the factors that increase the likelihood of depressive symptoms,” said Hillary Thomas, PhD, a pediatric psychologist at Children’s Medical Center in Dallas. “Depression screening should be routine at epilepsy treatment centers and can identify children and teens who would benefit from intervention.”

Following 2015 guidelines from the American Academy of Neurology, the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center at Children’s Health System in Dallas developed a behavioral health screening protocol for teens with epilepsy. The center aims to identify patients with depressive symptoms and ensure that they are referred to appropriate behavioral health practitioners. Clinicians also review the screening data and seizure variables for their potential implications for clinical care. Researchers at the center also seek to elucidate the relationship between depressive symptoms and seizure diagnosis and treatment.

As part of the protocol, Dr. Thomas and her colleagues administer the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (adolescent version) to all patients aged 15-18 years during their visit to the epilepsy clinic. Patients with intellectual disability or other factors that prevent them from providing valid responses are excluded. If a patient’s PHQ-9 score indicates at least moderately severe depressive symptoms, or if he or she reports suicidal ideation, clinicians follow a specific response protocol that includes providing referrals, encouraging follow-up with the patient’s current mental health provider, and obtaining a suicide risk assessment from a psychologist or social worker. After the screener is completed, clinicians retrieve demographic and clinical data (e.g., seizure diagnosis, medication, number of clinic or emergency department visits) from the patient’s medical record and include them in a database for subsequent analysis.

Dr. Thomas and her colleagues presented data from 394 youth with epilepsy whom they had screened. Patients’ mean age was 16 years, and half of the population was female. The study population had rates of depression similar to those identified in previous studies, said Dr. Thomas. Approximately 87% of patients had minimal or mild depressive symptoms, and 8% had moderately severe depressive symptoms. Furthermore, 5% of the patients reported suicidal ideation or previous suicide attempt. Several of the patients with suicidal ideation had a current mental health provider, and the others required an in-clinic risk assessment. Overall, 13% of the population required behavioral health referral or intervention. When the researchers conducted chi-squared analysis, they found no significant association between seizure type and depression severity.

“Our results don’t mean that only 13% of the teens with epilepsy had depressive symptoms,” said Susan Arnold, MD, director of the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center and a coauthor of the study. “They indicate the significant percentage of teens whose level of depressive symptoms warranted behavioral health referrals or further evaluation or even intervention during a clinic visit. Health care providers need to be vigilant about continually screening children and teens for depression.” As part of each patient’s comprehensive care, epilepsy treatment centers should provide psychosocial teams that include social workers or psychologists, she added.

The investigators plan to continue analyzing the data for specific depression symptoms that are most common in teens. These symptoms could be the basis for developing additional resources for families, such as lists of warning signs and guides to symptom management, as well as group therapy and support groups.
 

[email protected]

SOURCE: Thomas HM et al. Abstract 1.388.

NEW ORLEANS – Clinicians should screen patients with pediatric epilepsy for depression regularly, according to research described at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society. Referral to a mental health provider is adequate for most patients with moderately severe symptoms of depression, but some patients may require active intervention during the clinical visit, said the researchers.

“We know that depression is more common in people with epilepsy, compared to the general population, but there is less information about depression in children and teens than adults, and little is known about the factors that increase the likelihood of depressive symptoms,” said Hillary Thomas, PhD, a pediatric psychologist at Children’s Medical Center in Dallas. “Depression screening should be routine at epilepsy treatment centers and can identify children and teens who would benefit from intervention.”

Following 2015 guidelines from the American Academy of Neurology, the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center at Children’s Health System in Dallas developed a behavioral health screening protocol for teens with epilepsy. The center aims to identify patients with depressive symptoms and ensure that they are referred to appropriate behavioral health practitioners. Clinicians also review the screening data and seizure variables for their potential implications for clinical care. Researchers at the center also seek to elucidate the relationship between depressive symptoms and seizure diagnosis and treatment.

As part of the protocol, Dr. Thomas and her colleagues administer the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (adolescent version) to all patients aged 15-18 years during their visit to the epilepsy clinic. Patients with intellectual disability or other factors that prevent them from providing valid responses are excluded. If a patient’s PHQ-9 score indicates at least moderately severe depressive symptoms, or if he or she reports suicidal ideation, clinicians follow a specific response protocol that includes providing referrals, encouraging follow-up with the patient’s current mental health provider, and obtaining a suicide risk assessment from a psychologist or social worker. After the screener is completed, clinicians retrieve demographic and clinical data (e.g., seizure diagnosis, medication, number of clinic or emergency department visits) from the patient’s medical record and include them in a database for subsequent analysis.

Dr. Thomas and her colleagues presented data from 394 youth with epilepsy whom they had screened. Patients’ mean age was 16 years, and half of the population was female. The study population had rates of depression similar to those identified in previous studies, said Dr. Thomas. Approximately 87% of patients had minimal or mild depressive symptoms, and 8% had moderately severe depressive symptoms. Furthermore, 5% of the patients reported suicidal ideation or previous suicide attempt. Several of the patients with suicidal ideation had a current mental health provider, and the others required an in-clinic risk assessment. Overall, 13% of the population required behavioral health referral or intervention. When the researchers conducted chi-squared analysis, they found no significant association between seizure type and depression severity.

“Our results don’t mean that only 13% of the teens with epilepsy had depressive symptoms,” said Susan Arnold, MD, director of the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center and a coauthor of the study. “They indicate the significant percentage of teens whose level of depressive symptoms warranted behavioral health referrals or further evaluation or even intervention during a clinic visit. Health care providers need to be vigilant about continually screening children and teens for depression.” As part of each patient’s comprehensive care, epilepsy treatment centers should provide psychosocial teams that include social workers or psychologists, she added.

The investigators plan to continue analyzing the data for specific depression symptoms that are most common in teens. These symptoms could be the basis for developing additional resources for families, such as lists of warning signs and guides to symptom management, as well as group therapy and support groups.
 

[email protected]

SOURCE: Thomas HM et al. Abstract 1.388.

NEW ORLEANS – Clinicians should screen patients with pediatric epilepsy for depression regularly, according to research described at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society. Referral to a mental health provider is adequate for most patients with moderately severe symptoms of depression, but some patients may require active intervention during the clinical visit, said the researchers.

“We know that depression is more common in people with epilepsy, compared to the general population, but there is less information about depression in children and teens than adults, and little is known about the factors that increase the likelihood of depressive symptoms,” said Hillary Thomas, PhD, a pediatric psychologist at Children’s Medical Center in Dallas. “Depression screening should be routine at epilepsy treatment centers and can identify children and teens who would benefit from intervention.”

Following 2015 guidelines from the American Academy of Neurology, the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center at Children’s Health System in Dallas developed a behavioral health screening protocol for teens with epilepsy. The center aims to identify patients with depressive symptoms and ensure that they are referred to appropriate behavioral health practitioners. Clinicians also review the screening data and seizure variables for their potential implications for clinical care. Researchers at the center also seek to elucidate the relationship between depressive symptoms and seizure diagnosis and treatment.

As part of the protocol, Dr. Thomas and her colleagues administer the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (adolescent version) to all patients aged 15-18 years during their visit to the epilepsy clinic. Patients with intellectual disability or other factors that prevent them from providing valid responses are excluded. If a patient’s PHQ-9 score indicates at least moderately severe depressive symptoms, or if he or she reports suicidal ideation, clinicians follow a specific response protocol that includes providing referrals, encouraging follow-up with the patient’s current mental health provider, and obtaining a suicide risk assessment from a psychologist or social worker. After the screener is completed, clinicians retrieve demographic and clinical data (e.g., seizure diagnosis, medication, number of clinic or emergency department visits) from the patient’s medical record and include them in a database for subsequent analysis.

Dr. Thomas and her colleagues presented data from 394 youth with epilepsy whom they had screened. Patients’ mean age was 16 years, and half of the population was female. The study population had rates of depression similar to those identified in previous studies, said Dr. Thomas. Approximately 87% of patients had minimal or mild depressive symptoms, and 8% had moderately severe depressive symptoms. Furthermore, 5% of the patients reported suicidal ideation or previous suicide attempt. Several of the patients with suicidal ideation had a current mental health provider, and the others required an in-clinic risk assessment. Overall, 13% of the population required behavioral health referral or intervention. When the researchers conducted chi-squared analysis, they found no significant association between seizure type and depression severity.

“Our results don’t mean that only 13% of the teens with epilepsy had depressive symptoms,” said Susan Arnold, MD, director of the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center and a coauthor of the study. “They indicate the significant percentage of teens whose level of depressive symptoms warranted behavioral health referrals or further evaluation or even intervention during a clinic visit. Health care providers need to be vigilant about continually screening children and teens for depression.” As part of each patient’s comprehensive care, epilepsy treatment centers should provide psychosocial teams that include social workers or psychologists, she added.

The investigators plan to continue analyzing the data for specific depression symptoms that are most common in teens. These symptoms could be the basis for developing additional resources for families, such as lists of warning signs and guides to symptom management, as well as group therapy and support groups.
 

[email protected]

SOURCE: Thomas HM et al. Abstract 1.388.

Acute flaccid myelitis appears to present most commonly as asymmetric weakness after respiratory viral infection and has distinctive MRI features that could help with early diagnosis.

In a paper published in JAMA Pediatrics, researchers presented the results of a retrospective case series of 45 children who were diagnosed between 2012 and 2016 with acute flaccid myelitis, or “pseudo polio,” using the Centers for Disease Control’s case definition.

Matthew J. Elrick, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and his coauthors came up with a set of reproducible and distinctive features of acute flaccid myelitis. These were the presence of a prodromal fever or viral syndrome; weakness in a lower motor neuron pattern involving one or more limbs, neck, face, and/or bulbar muscles; supportive evidence either from MRI, nerve conduction studies, or cerebrospinal fluid; and the absence of objective sensory deficits, supratentorial white matter, cortical lesions greater than 1 cm in size, encephalopathy, elevated cerebrospinal fluid without pleocytosis, or any other alternative diagnosis.

The researchers commented that, while the CDC case definition has helped with epidemiologic surveillance of acute flaccid myelitis, it may also pick up children with acute weakness caused by other conditions such as transverse myelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, ischemic myelopathy, and other myelopathies.

To identify clinical features that might help differentiate patients with acute flaccid myelitis, the researchers attempted to see how many alternative diagnoses were captured in the CDC case definition.

The patients in their study all presented with acute flaccid paralysis in at least one limb and with either an MRI showing a spinal cord lesion spanning one or more spinal segments but largely restricted to gray matter or pleocytosis of the cerebrospinal fluid. The researchers divided the cases into those who also met a well-defined alternative diagnosis – who they categorized as “acute flaccid myelitis with possible alternative diagnosis” (AFM-ad) – and those who were categorized as “restrictively defined AFM” (rAFM). Overall, 34 patients were classified as rAFM and 11 as AFM-ad.

Those in the rAFD group nearly all had asymmetric onset of symptoms, while those in the AFM-ad group were more likely to experience bilateral onset in their lower extremities, “reflecting the pattern of symptoms often seen in other causes of myelopathy such as transverse myelitis and ischemic injury,” the authors noted.

While both groups often presented with decreased muscle tone and reflexes, this was more likely to evolve to increased tone or hyperreflexia in the AFM-ad group. Patients with AFM-ad were also more likely to experience impaired bowel or bladder function.

On MRI, lesions were mostly or completely restricted to the spinal cord gray matter in patients with rAFM or to involve the dorsal pons. These patients did not have any supratentorial brain lesions.

Patients in the rAFM category also had lower cerebrospinal fluid protein values than those in the AFM-ad category, but this was the only cerebrospinal fluid difference between the two groups.

All patients categorized as having rAFM had an infectious prodrome – such as viral syndrome, fever, congestion, and cough – compared with 63.6% of the patients categorized as AFM-ad. The pathogen was identified in only 13 of the rAFM patients, and included 5 patients with enterovirus D68, 2 with unspecified enterovirus, 2 with rhinovirus, 2 with adenovirus, and 2 with mycoplasma. Of the three patients in the AFM-ad group whose pathogen was identified, one had an untyped rhinovirus/enterovirus and mycoplasma, one had a rhinovirus B, and one had enterovirus D68.

“These results highlight that the CDC case definition, while appropriately sensitive for epidemiologic ascertainment of possible AFM cases, also encompasses other neurologic diseases that can cause acute weakness,” the authors wrote. However, they acknowledged that acute flaccid myelitis was still poorly understood and their own definition of the disease may change as more children are diagnosed.

“We propose that the definition of rAFM presented here be used as a starting point for developing inclusion and exclusion criteria for future research studies of AFM,” they wrote.

The study was supported by Johns Hopkins University, the Bart McLean Fund for Neuroimmunology Research, and Project Restore. Two authors reported funding from private industry outside the submitted work and five reported support from or involvement with research and funding bodies.

SOURCE: Elrick MJ et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Nov 30. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4890.
 

Acute flaccid myelitis appears to present most commonly as asymmetric weakness after respiratory viral infection and has distinctive MRI features that could help with early diagnosis.

In a paper published in JAMA Pediatrics, researchers presented the results of a retrospective case series of 45 children who were diagnosed between 2012 and 2016 with acute flaccid myelitis, or “pseudo polio,” using the Centers for Disease Control’s case definition.

Matthew J. Elrick, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and his coauthors came up with a set of reproducible and distinctive features of acute flaccid myelitis. These were the presence of a prodromal fever or viral syndrome; weakness in a lower motor neuron pattern involving one or more limbs, neck, face, and/or bulbar muscles; supportive evidence either from MRI, nerve conduction studies, or cerebrospinal fluid; and the absence of objective sensory deficits, supratentorial white matter, cortical lesions greater than 1 cm in size, encephalopathy, elevated cerebrospinal fluid without pleocytosis, or any other alternative diagnosis.

The researchers commented that, while the CDC case definition has helped with epidemiologic surveillance of acute flaccid myelitis, it may also pick up children with acute weakness caused by other conditions such as transverse myelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, ischemic myelopathy, and other myelopathies.

To identify clinical features that might help differentiate patients with acute flaccid myelitis, the researchers attempted to see how many alternative diagnoses were captured in the CDC case definition.

The patients in their study all presented with acute flaccid paralysis in at least one limb and with either an MRI showing a spinal cord lesion spanning one or more spinal segments but largely restricted to gray matter or pleocytosis of the cerebrospinal fluid. The researchers divided the cases into those who also met a well-defined alternative diagnosis – who they categorized as “acute flaccid myelitis with possible alternative diagnosis” (AFM-ad) – and those who were categorized as “restrictively defined AFM” (rAFM). Overall, 34 patients were classified as rAFM and 11 as AFM-ad.

Those in the rAFD group nearly all had asymmetric onset of symptoms, while those in the AFM-ad group were more likely to experience bilateral onset in their lower extremities, “reflecting the pattern of symptoms often seen in other causes of myelopathy such as transverse myelitis and ischemic injury,” the authors noted.

While both groups often presented with decreased muscle tone and reflexes, this was more likely to evolve to increased tone or hyperreflexia in the AFM-ad group. Patients with AFM-ad were also more likely to experience impaired bowel or bladder function.

On MRI, lesions were mostly or completely restricted to the spinal cord gray matter in patients with rAFM or to involve the dorsal pons. These patients did not have any supratentorial brain lesions.

Patients in the rAFM category also had lower cerebrospinal fluid protein values than those in the AFM-ad category, but this was the only cerebrospinal fluid difference between the two groups.

All patients categorized as having rAFM had an infectious prodrome – such as viral syndrome, fever, congestion, and cough – compared with 63.6% of the patients categorized as AFM-ad. The pathogen was identified in only 13 of the rAFM patients, and included 5 patients with enterovirus D68, 2 with unspecified enterovirus, 2 with rhinovirus, 2 with adenovirus, and 2 with mycoplasma. Of the three patients in the AFM-ad group whose pathogen was identified, one had an untyped rhinovirus/enterovirus and mycoplasma, one had a rhinovirus B, and one had enterovirus D68.

“These results highlight that the CDC case definition, while appropriately sensitive for epidemiologic ascertainment of possible AFM cases, also encompasses other neurologic diseases that can cause acute weakness,” the authors wrote. However, they acknowledged that acute flaccid myelitis was still poorly understood and their own definition of the disease may change as more children are diagnosed.

“We propose that the definition of rAFM presented here be used as a starting point for developing inclusion and exclusion criteria for future research studies of AFM,” they wrote.

The study was supported by Johns Hopkins University, the Bart McLean Fund for Neuroimmunology Research, and Project Restore. Two authors reported funding from private industry outside the submitted work and five reported support from or involvement with research and funding bodies.

SOURCE: Elrick MJ et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Nov 30. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4890.
 

Acute flaccid myelitis appears to present most commonly as asymmetric weakness after respiratory viral infection and has distinctive MRI features that could help with early diagnosis.

In a paper published in JAMA Pediatrics, researchers presented the results of a retrospective case series of 45 children who were diagnosed between 2012 and 2016 with acute flaccid myelitis, or “pseudo polio,” using the Centers for Disease Control’s case definition.

Matthew J. Elrick, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and his coauthors came up with a set of reproducible and distinctive features of acute flaccid myelitis. These were the presence of a prodromal fever or viral syndrome; weakness in a lower motor neuron pattern involving one or more limbs, neck, face, and/or bulbar muscles; supportive evidence either from MRI, nerve conduction studies, or cerebrospinal fluid; and the absence of objective sensory deficits, supratentorial white matter, cortical lesions greater than 1 cm in size, encephalopathy, elevated cerebrospinal fluid without pleocytosis, or any other alternative diagnosis.

The researchers commented that, while the CDC case definition has helped with epidemiologic surveillance of acute flaccid myelitis, it may also pick up children with acute weakness caused by other conditions such as transverse myelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, ischemic myelopathy, and other myelopathies.

To identify clinical features that might help differentiate patients with acute flaccid myelitis, the researchers attempted to see how many alternative diagnoses were captured in the CDC case definition.

The patients in their study all presented with acute flaccid paralysis in at least one limb and with either an MRI showing a spinal cord lesion spanning one or more spinal segments but largely restricted to gray matter or pleocytosis of the cerebrospinal fluid. The researchers divided the cases into those who also met a well-defined alternative diagnosis – who they categorized as “acute flaccid myelitis with possible alternative diagnosis” (AFM-ad) – and those who were categorized as “restrictively defined AFM” (rAFM). Overall, 34 patients were classified as rAFM and 11 as AFM-ad.

Those in the rAFD group nearly all had asymmetric onset of symptoms, while those in the AFM-ad group were more likely to experience bilateral onset in their lower extremities, “reflecting the pattern of symptoms often seen in other causes of myelopathy such as transverse myelitis and ischemic injury,” the authors noted.

While both groups often presented with decreased muscle tone and reflexes, this was more likely to evolve to increased tone or hyperreflexia in the AFM-ad group. Patients with AFM-ad were also more likely to experience impaired bowel or bladder function.

On MRI, lesions were mostly or completely restricted to the spinal cord gray matter in patients with rAFM or to involve the dorsal pons. These patients did not have any supratentorial brain lesions.

Patients in the rAFM category also had lower cerebrospinal fluid protein values than those in the AFM-ad category, but this was the only cerebrospinal fluid difference between the two groups.

All patients categorized as having rAFM had an infectious prodrome – such as viral syndrome, fever, congestion, and cough – compared with 63.6% of the patients categorized as AFM-ad. The pathogen was identified in only 13 of the rAFM patients, and included 5 patients with enterovirus D68, 2 with unspecified enterovirus, 2 with rhinovirus, 2 with adenovirus, and 2 with mycoplasma. Of the three patients in the AFM-ad group whose pathogen was identified, one had an untyped rhinovirus/enterovirus and mycoplasma, one had a rhinovirus B, and one had enterovirus D68.

“These results highlight that the CDC case definition, while appropriately sensitive for epidemiologic ascertainment of possible AFM cases, also encompasses other neurologic diseases that can cause acute weakness,” the authors wrote. However, they acknowledged that acute flaccid myelitis was still poorly understood and their own definition of the disease may change as more children are diagnosed.

“We propose that the definition of rAFM presented here be used as a starting point for developing inclusion and exclusion criteria for future research studies of AFM,” they wrote.

The study was supported by Johns Hopkins University, the Bart McLean Fund for Neuroimmunology Research, and Project Restore. Two authors reported funding from private industry outside the submitted work and five reported support from or involvement with research and funding bodies.

SOURCE: Elrick MJ et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Nov 30. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4890.
 

Instances of stroke and arterial dissection in the head and neck have been reported in some multiple sclerosis patients soon after an infusion of alemtuzumab (Lemtrada), according to a safety announcement issued by the Food and Drug Administration on Nov. 29.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License

Since the FDA approved alemtuzumab in 2014 for relapsing forms of MS, 13 cases of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke or arterial dissection have been reported worldwide via the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, but “additional cases we are unaware of may have occurred,” the FDA said in the announcement.

Most of the patients who developed stroke or arterial lining tears showed symptoms within a day of taking the medication, although one patient reported symptoms three days after treatment. The drug is given via intravenous infusion and is generally reserved for patients with relapsing MS who have not responded adequately to other approved MS medications, according to the FDA.

Symptoms include sudden onset of the following: severe headache or neck pain; numbness or weakness in the arms or legs, especially on only one side of the body; confusion or trouble speaking or understanding speech; vision problems in one or both eyes; and dizziness, loss of balance, or difficulty walking.

As a result of the reports, the FDA has updated the drug label prescribing information and the patient Medication Guide to reflect these risks, and added the risk of stroke to the medication’s existing boxed warning.

Health care providers should remind patients of the potential for stroke and arterial dissection at each treatment visit and advise them to seek immediate medical attention if they experience any of the symptoms reported in previous cases. “The diagnosis is often complicated because early symptoms such as headache and neck pain are not specific,” according to the agency, but patients complaining of such symptoms should be evaluated immediately.

Alemtuzumab was also approved in May 2001 for treating B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) under the brand name Campath. The FDA will update the Campath label to reflect the new warnings and risks.

Instances of stroke and arterial dissection in the head and neck have been reported in some multiple sclerosis patients soon after an infusion of alemtuzumab (Lemtrada), according to a safety announcement issued by the Food and Drug Administration on Nov. 29.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License

Since the FDA approved alemtuzumab in 2014 for relapsing forms of MS, 13 cases of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke or arterial dissection have been reported worldwide via the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, but “additional cases we are unaware of may have occurred,” the FDA said in the announcement.

Most of the patients who developed stroke or arterial lining tears showed symptoms within a day of taking the medication, although one patient reported symptoms three days after treatment. The drug is given via intravenous infusion and is generally reserved for patients with relapsing MS who have not responded adequately to other approved MS medications, according to the FDA.

Symptoms include sudden onset of the following: severe headache or neck pain; numbness or weakness in the arms or legs, especially on only one side of the body; confusion or trouble speaking or understanding speech; vision problems in one or both eyes; and dizziness, loss of balance, or difficulty walking.

As a result of the reports, the FDA has updated the drug label prescribing information and the patient Medication Guide to reflect these risks, and added the risk of stroke to the medication’s existing boxed warning.

Health care providers should remind patients of the potential for stroke and arterial dissection at each treatment visit and advise them to seek immediate medical attention if they experience any of the symptoms reported in previous cases. “The diagnosis is often complicated because early symptoms such as headache and neck pain are not specific,” according to the agency, but patients complaining of such symptoms should be evaluated immediately.

Alemtuzumab was also approved in May 2001 for treating B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) under the brand name Campath. The FDA will update the Campath label to reflect the new warnings and risks.

Instances of stroke and arterial dissection in the head and neck have been reported in some multiple sclerosis patients soon after an infusion of alemtuzumab (Lemtrada), according to a safety announcement issued by the Food and Drug Administration on Nov. 29.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License

Since the FDA approved alemtuzumab in 2014 for relapsing forms of MS, 13 cases of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke or arterial dissection have been reported worldwide via the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, but “additional cases we are unaware of may have occurred,” the FDA said in the announcement.

Most of the patients who developed stroke or arterial lining tears showed symptoms within a day of taking the medication, although one patient reported symptoms three days after treatment. The drug is given via intravenous infusion and is generally reserved for patients with relapsing MS who have not responded adequately to other approved MS medications, according to the FDA.

Symptoms include sudden onset of the following: severe headache or neck pain; numbness or weakness in the arms or legs, especially on only one side of the body; confusion or trouble speaking or understanding speech; vision problems in one or both eyes; and dizziness, loss of balance, or difficulty walking.

As a result of the reports, the FDA has updated the drug label prescribing information and the patient Medication Guide to reflect these risks, and added the risk of stroke to the medication’s existing boxed warning.

Health care providers should remind patients of the potential for stroke and arterial dissection at each treatment visit and advise them to seek immediate medical attention if they experience any of the symptoms reported in previous cases. “The diagnosis is often complicated because early symptoms such as headache and neck pain are not specific,” according to the agency, but patients complaining of such symptoms should be evaluated immediately.

Alemtuzumab was also approved in May 2001 for treating B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) under the brand name Campath. The FDA will update the Campath label to reflect the new warnings and risks.

Three commonly used, brief cognitive tests erroneously identified dementia, resulting in more than a third of those screened being incorrectly classified, a retrospective analysis has concluded.

The likelihood of a false-positive or false-negative result declined sharply when all three tests were given, however; only about 2% of patients were misclassified in all three, David Llewellyn, PhD, and his colleagues reported in Neurology: Clinical Practice.

The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Memory Impairment Screen (MIS), and animal naming (AN) were susceptible to different measurement biases, wrote Dr. Llewellyn of the University of Exeter (U.K.).

Just one variable – an informant’s perception of the patient’s memory as unimpaired – consistently predicted inaccuracy in all three tests. Most of the patients in this category carried the diagnosis of cognitively impaired but not demented (CIND), a finding that has important clinical implications.

“These participants may be in the very early stages of conversion to dementia. ... Therefore, of those with low or borderline cognitive assessment results, reassessment to detect further decline may be appropriate.”

The study comprised 824 patients included in the Aging, Demographics and Memory Study, which is a subsample of the Health and Retirement Study. They completed the tests from 2001-2004, during which time they were a mean of 82 years old. A panel of experts adjudicated diagnoses, which they then parsed into all-cause dementia, CIND, or cognitively normal. The testing included a self and informant assessment of memory decline. The investigators also looked at 22 predictors of cognition, including patient characteristics, apolipoprotein E carriage (ApoE e4), and sociodemographic factors.

The prevalence of dementia was 35.3%; of the nondemented patients, 43% met the criteria for CIND. The team found that 35.7% of cases were misclassified by at least one test, 13.4% by two, and 1.7% by all three.

The MMSE was the least accurate, with a 21% misclassification rate, reflected in an 18.6% false-positive rate for those without dementia and a 2.4% rate of false-negative for those with dementia.

The MIS had a 16% misclassification rate, with a 9.5% rate of false-positive for those with no dementia and a 6.3% rate of false-negative for those without.

The AN had a 14% misclassification rate, with a 6.8% false-positive rate for those without dementia and a 7.7% false-negative rate for those with dementia.

For the MMSE, MIS, and AN, the number of participants with false-positives that met the criteria for CIND were 74.5%, 82.1%, and 82.1%, respectively.

In the final multivariate model, seven variables predicted misclassification, including black ethnicity for the MMSE; age, visual impairment, ApoeE4 noncarrier, and depression for the MIS; and no hyperlipidemia and normal informant memory assessment for the AN. Lower years of education and heart problems predicted misclassification on both the MMSE and AN.

An absence of informant-related poor memory predicted misclassification on all three tests.

“Failing to detect dementia can delay access to treatment and support, whereas false alarms lead to unnecessary investigations, causing pressure on health care systems,” Dr. Llewellyn said in a press statement. “Identifying people with dementia in a timely fashion is important, particularly as new methods of treatment come onstream. Our findings show that we desperately need more accurate and less biased ways of detecting dementia swiftly in clinic.”

The study was supported by the Halpin Trust, the Mary Kinross Charitable Trust, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, and the U.K. National Institute for Health Research. None of the authors reported any financial conflicts relevant to the work.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Llewellyn D et al. Neuro Clin Pract. 2019;1:1-9.

Three commonly used, brief cognitive tests erroneously identified dementia, resulting in more than a third of those screened being incorrectly classified, a retrospective analysis has concluded.

The likelihood of a false-positive or false-negative result declined sharply when all three tests were given, however; only about 2% of patients were misclassified in all three, David Llewellyn, PhD, and his colleagues reported in Neurology: Clinical Practice.

The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Memory Impairment Screen (MIS), and animal naming (AN) were susceptible to different measurement biases, wrote Dr. Llewellyn of the University of Exeter (U.K.).

Just one variable – an informant’s perception of the patient’s memory as unimpaired – consistently predicted inaccuracy in all three tests. Most of the patients in this category carried the diagnosis of cognitively impaired but not demented (CIND), a finding that has important clinical implications.

“These participants may be in the very early stages of conversion to dementia. ... Therefore, of those with low or borderline cognitive assessment results, reassessment to detect further decline may be appropriate.”

The study comprised 824 patients included in the Aging, Demographics and Memory Study, which is a subsample of the Health and Retirement Study. They completed the tests from 2001-2004, during which time they were a mean of 82 years old. A panel of experts adjudicated diagnoses, which they then parsed into all-cause dementia, CIND, or cognitively normal. The testing included a self and informant assessment of memory decline. The investigators also looked at 22 predictors of cognition, including patient characteristics, apolipoprotein E carriage (ApoE e4), and sociodemographic factors.

The prevalence of dementia was 35.3%; of the nondemented patients, 43% met the criteria for CIND. The team found that 35.7% of cases were misclassified by at least one test, 13.4% by two, and 1.7% by all three.

The MMSE was the least accurate, with a 21% misclassification rate, reflected in an 18.6% false-positive rate for those without dementia and a 2.4% rate of false-negative for those with dementia.

The MIS had a 16% misclassification rate, with a 9.5% rate of false-positive for those with no dementia and a 6.3% rate of false-negative for those without.

The AN had a 14% misclassification rate, with a 6.8% false-positive rate for those without dementia and a 7.7% false-negative rate for those with dementia.

For the MMSE, MIS, and AN, the number of participants with false-positives that met the criteria for CIND were 74.5%, 82.1%, and 82.1%, respectively.

In the final multivariate model, seven variables predicted misclassification, including black ethnicity for the MMSE; age, visual impairment, ApoeE4 noncarrier, and depression for the MIS; and no hyperlipidemia and normal informant memory assessment for the AN. Lower years of education and heart problems predicted misclassification on both the MMSE and AN.

An absence of informant-related poor memory predicted misclassification on all three tests.

“Failing to detect dementia can delay access to treatment and support, whereas false alarms lead to unnecessary investigations, causing pressure on health care systems,” Dr. Llewellyn said in a press statement. “Identifying people with dementia in a timely fashion is important, particularly as new methods of treatment come onstream. Our findings show that we desperately need more accurate and less biased ways of detecting dementia swiftly in clinic.”

The study was supported by the Halpin Trust, the Mary Kinross Charitable Trust, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, and the U.K. National Institute for Health Research. None of the authors reported any financial conflicts relevant to the work.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Llewellyn D et al. Neuro Clin Pract. 2019;1:1-9.

Three commonly used, brief cognitive tests erroneously identified dementia, resulting in more than a third of those screened being incorrectly classified, a retrospective analysis has concluded.

The likelihood of a false-positive or false-negative result declined sharply when all three tests were given, however; only about 2% of patients were misclassified in all three, David Llewellyn, PhD, and his colleagues reported in Neurology: Clinical Practice.

The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Memory Impairment Screen (MIS), and animal naming (AN) were susceptible to different measurement biases, wrote Dr. Llewellyn of the University of Exeter (U.K.).

Just one variable – an informant’s perception of the patient’s memory as unimpaired – consistently predicted inaccuracy in all three tests. Most of the patients in this category carried the diagnosis of cognitively impaired but not demented (CIND), a finding that has important clinical implications.

“These participants may be in the very early stages of conversion to dementia. ... Therefore, of those with low or borderline cognitive assessment results, reassessment to detect further decline may be appropriate.”

The study comprised 824 patients included in the Aging, Demographics and Memory Study, which is a subsample of the Health and Retirement Study. They completed the tests from 2001-2004, during which time they were a mean of 82 years old. A panel of experts adjudicated diagnoses, which they then parsed into all-cause dementia, CIND, or cognitively normal. The testing included a self and informant assessment of memory decline. The investigators also looked at 22 predictors of cognition, including patient characteristics, apolipoprotein E carriage (ApoE e4), and sociodemographic factors.

The prevalence of dementia was 35.3%; of the nondemented patients, 43% met the criteria for CIND. The team found that 35.7% of cases were misclassified by at least one test, 13.4% by two, and 1.7% by all three.

The MMSE was the least accurate, with a 21% misclassification rate, reflected in an 18.6% false-positive rate for those without dementia and a 2.4% rate of false-negative for those with dementia.

The MIS had a 16% misclassification rate, with a 9.5% rate of false-positive for those with no dementia and a 6.3% rate of false-negative for those without.

The AN had a 14% misclassification rate, with a 6.8% false-positive rate for those without dementia and a 7.7% false-negative rate for those with dementia.

For the MMSE, MIS, and AN, the number of participants with false-positives that met the criteria for CIND were 74.5%, 82.1%, and 82.1%, respectively.

In the final multivariate model, seven variables predicted misclassification, including black ethnicity for the MMSE; age, visual impairment, ApoeE4 noncarrier, and depression for the MIS; and no hyperlipidemia and normal informant memory assessment for the AN. Lower years of education and heart problems predicted misclassification on both the MMSE and AN.

An absence of informant-related poor memory predicted misclassification on all three tests.

“Failing to detect dementia can delay access to treatment and support, whereas false alarms lead to unnecessary investigations, causing pressure on health care systems,” Dr. Llewellyn said in a press statement. “Identifying people with dementia in a timely fashion is important, particularly as new methods of treatment come onstream. Our findings show that we desperately need more accurate and less biased ways of detecting dementia swiftly in clinic.”

The study was supported by the Halpin Trust, the Mary Kinross Charitable Trust, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, and the U.K. National Institute for Health Research. None of the authors reported any financial conflicts relevant to the work.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Llewellyn D et al. Neuro Clin Pract. 2019;1:1-9.