Obstetrics

Was fetus’ wrist injured during cesarean delivery?

At 34 weeks’ gestation, a 39-year-old woman went to the hospital in preterm labor. Her history included a prior cesarean delivery. Ultrasonography (US) showed that the fetus was in a double-footling breech position. The ObGyn decided to perform a cesarean delivery when the fetal heart-rate monitor indicated distress.

After making a midline incision through the earlier scar, the ObGyn created a low transverse uterine incision with a scalpel. The mother’s uterus was thick because labor had not progressed. When the ObGyn was unable to deliver the baby through the low transverse incision, she performed a T-extension of the incision using bandage scissors while placing her free hand inside the uterus to shield the fetus from injury. After extensive manipulation, the baby was delivered and immediately handed to a neonatologist. After surgery, the neonatologist told the mother that the baby had sustained two lacerations to the ulnar side of the right wrist. The newborn was airlifted to another hospital for treatment of sepsis. There, an orthopedic hand surgeon examined the child and determined that the lacerations were superficial and only required sutures. The orthopedist saw the infant a month later and believed there was no significant wrist injury.

When the child began preschool, she started to experience cold intolerance and difficulty writing with her right hand. The child was referred to a pediatric neurologist, who found no nerve damage and ordered occupational therapy.

The original orthopedic surgeon examined the child when she was 7 years old and determined that the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon had been completely severed with a partial injury to the ulnar nerve. He recommended a return visit at age 14 for full assessment of the wrist injury.

PARENTS’ CLAIM The ObGyn did not properly shield the fetus when performing the T-extension incision during cesarean delivery. The child’s weakness will increase with age, ruling out some occupations.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE The ObGyn was not negligent; she had provided adequate protection of the fetus during both incisions.

VERDICT An Illinois defense verdict was returned.

Woman dies after tubal ligation

After a 42-year-old woman underwent tubal ligation, her surgeon was concerned about a possible bowel perforation and admitted her to the hospital. The next morning, a computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen did not reveal bowel injury.

That afternoon, when the patient reported shortness of breath, the surgeon called the hospitalist with concern for pulmonary embolism (PE). The hospitalist immediately ordered a CT scan of the chest, initiated PE protocol, and wrote “r/o PE” on the chart. A radiologist reminded the hospitalist of the earlier CT scan with concern for kidney damage from another dye study. The hospitalist cancelled the CT scan and PE protocol. After waiting 17 hours to run any further tests, a CT scan revealed massive bilateral PE. The patient was transferred to the ICU, but died the next day.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The 17-hour delay was negligent.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE There was no negligence. The patient died of septic shock, not PE.

VERDICT A $4 million Virginia verdict was returned.

Child born without hand and forearm

During prenatal care, a mother underwent US at 20 and 36 weeks; both studies were reported as normal. The child was born missing his left hand and part of his left forearm due to a congenital amputation. The child will require prosthetics for life.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The condition should have been seen during prenatal US; an abortion was still an option at 20 weeks.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE US was properly performed and evaluated. It can be difficult to differentiate the right from left extremities.

VERDICT A California defense verdict was returned.

After starting Yasmin, woman has stroke with permanent paralysis: $16.5M total award

When a 37-year-old woman reported irregular menstruation, her ObGyn prescribed drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol (Yasmin; Bayer). Thirteen days after starting the drug, the patient had a stroke. She is paralyzed on her left side, has limited ability to speak, cannot use her left arm and leg, and requires 24-hour care.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The ObGyn should have recognized that Yasmin was not appropriate for this patient because of the drug’s clotting risks. The patient’s risk factors included her age (over 35), borderline hypertension, overweight, history of smoking, and high cholesterol. The ObGyn should have offered safer alternatives, such as a progesterone-only pill. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a safety warning that all drospirenone-containing drugs may be associated with a higher risk of venous thrombosis during the first 6 months of use.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE According to Bayer, Yasmin is safe, and remains on the market. It was an appropriate drug to treat her irregular bleeding.

VERDICT Claims against the medical center that referred the patient to the ObGyn were settled for $2.5 million before trial. A $14 million Illinois verdict was returned against the ObGyn, for a total award of $16.5 million.

Who is at fault when pelvic mesh erodes?

In January 2011, an ObGyn implanted the Gyne­care TVT Obturator System (TVT‑O; Ethicon) during a midurethral sling procedure to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in a woman in her 60s. Shortly thereafter, the ObGyn left practice because of early-onset Alzheimer’s disease, and the patient’s care was taken over by a gynecologist.

At the 2-month postoperative visit, the gynecologist found that the mesh had eroded into the patient’s vagina. The gynecologist simply cut the mesh with a scissor, charted that a small erosion was present, and prescribed estrogen cream.

The patient continued to report pain, discomfort, pressure, difficulty voiding urine, continued incontinence, vaginal discharge, scarring, infection, odor, and bleeding.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The polypropylene mesh used during the midurethral sling procedure has been shown to be incompatible with human tissue. It promotes an immune response, which stimulates degradation of the pelvic tissue and can contribute to the development of severe adverse reactions to the mesh. Ethicon negligently designed, manufactured, marketed, labeled, and packaged the pelvic mesh products.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE Proper warnings were provided about the health risks associated with polypropylene mesh products. The medical device was not properly sized.

VERDICT A Texas jury rejected the patient’s claims that Ethicon did not provide proper warnings about the sling’s health risks and declined to award punitive damages.

However, the jury decided that the mesh implant was defectively designed, and returned a $1.2 million verdict against Ethicon.

Was suspected bowel injury treated properly?

A 40-year-old woman was referred to an ObGyn after reporting abnormal uterine bleeding to her primary care physician. The patient had very light menses every few weeks. The ObGyn performed an ablation procedure, without relief. A month later, the ObGyn performed robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. The next day, the patient reported abdominal pain. Suspecting a bowel injury, the ObGyn ordered a CT scan; the bowel appeared normal, so the ObGyn referred the patient to a surgeon. During exploratory laparotomy, the surgeon found and repaired a bowel injury. The patient developed significant complications from a necrotizing infection that included respiratory distress and ongoing wound care.

PATIENT’S CLAIM Conservative treatment should have been offered before surgery. The ObGyn should have waited longer after the ablation procedure before doing the hysterectomy. The ObGyn should have checked for a possible bowel injury before closing the hysterectomy.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE The bowel injury is a known complication of the procedure and was recognized and repaired in a timely manner.

VERDICT A Kentucky defense verdict was returned.

Pap smear improperly interpreted: Woman dies from cervical cancer

A 37-year-old woman underwent a pap smear in 2008 that was read by a cytotechnologist as normal. Two years later, the patient was found to have a golf-ball–sized cancerous tumor. She died from cervical cancer in 2011.

ESTATE’S CLAIM The cytotechnologist was negligent in misreading the 2008 Pap smear. If treatment had been started in 2008, the cancer could have been resolved with a simple conization biopsy.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE The Pap smear interpretation was reasonable. The cancer could not have been diagnosed in 2008. The patient was at fault for failing to follow-up Pap smears during the next 2 years.

VERDICT After assigning 75% fault to the cytotechnologist and 25% fault to the patient, a Florida jury returned a $20,870,200 verdict, which was reduced to $15,816,699. 

Disastrous off-label use of anticoagulation

When a pelvic abscess was found, a 50-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital for treatment. She was taking warfarin due to a history of venous thromboembolism.

Before the procedure, her physicians attempted to temporarily reverse her anticoagulation by administering Factor IX Complex (Profilnine SD, Grifols Biologicals). The dose ordered for the patient was nearly double the maximum recommended weight-based dose. Almost immediately after receiving the infusion, the patient went into cardiopulmonary arrest and died. An autopsy found the cause of death to be pulmonary emboli (PE).

ESTATE’S CLAIM An excessive dose of Profilnine caused PE. At the time of the incident, Profilnine was not FDA approved for warfarin reversal, although some off-label uses were recognized in emergent situations, such as intracranial bleeds.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE The case was settled during the trial.

VERDICT A $1.25 million Virginia settlement was reached.

Vesicovaginal fistula from ureteral injury

At a women’s health clinic, a patient reported continuous, heavy vaginal bleeding; pain; and shortness of breath when walking. She had a history of endometritis and multiple abdominal surgeries. Examination disclosed a profuse vaginal discharge, a normal cervix, and an enlarged uterus. The patient consented to abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed by an ObGyn assisted by  a resident.

During surgery, the ObGyn found that the patient’s uterus was at 16 to 20 weeks’ gestation size, with multiple serosal uterine fibroids and frank pus and necrosed fibroid tumors within the uterine cavity. The procedure took longer than planned because of extensive adhesions. After surgery, the patient was anemic and was given a beta-blocker for tachycardia. She was discharged 3 days later with 48 hours’ worth of intravenous antibiotics.

A month later, the patient reported urinary incontinence. She saw a urologist, who found a vesicovaginal fistula. The patient underwent nephrostomy-tube placement. Right ureterolysis and a right ureteral reimplant was performed 4 months later.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The ObGyn injured the right ureter during surgery.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE The ureter injury is a known risk of the procedure. The injury was due to an infection or delayed effects of ischemia. The patient had a good recovery with no residual injury.

VERDICT A Michigan defense verdict was returned.

Why did mother die after delivering twins?

After a 35-year-old woman gave birth to twins by cesarean delivery, she died. At autopsy, 4 liters of blood were found in her abdomen.

ESTATE’S CLAIM The ObGyn failed to recognize and treat an arterial or venous bleed during surgery.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE The patient  died from amniotic fluid embolism. Autopsy results showed right ventricular heart failure, respiratory failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

VERDICT A Florida defense verdict was returned.  

These cases were selected by the editors of OBG Management from Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts, with permission of the editor, Lewis Laska (www.verdictslaska.com). The information available to the editors about the cases presented here is sometimes incomplete. Moreover, the cases may or may not have merit. Nevertheless, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation and are meant to illustrate nationwide variation in jury verdicts and awards.

Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Was fetus’ wrist injured during cesarean delivery?

At 34 weeks’ gestation, a 39-year-old woman went to the hospital in preterm labor. Her history included a prior cesarean delivery. Ultrasonography (US) showed that the fetus was in a double-footling breech position. The ObGyn decided to perform a cesarean delivery when the fetal heart-rate monitor indicated distress.

After making a midline incision through the earlier scar, the ObGyn created a low transverse uterine incision with a scalpel. The mother’s uterus was thick because labor had not progressed. When the ObGyn was unable to deliver the baby through the low transverse incision, she performed a T-extension of the incision using bandage scissors while placing her free hand inside the uterus to shield the fetus from injury. After extensive manipulation, the baby was delivered and immediately handed to a neonatologist. After surgery, the neonatologist told the mother that the baby had sustained two lacerations to the ulnar side of the right wrist. The newborn was airlifted to another hospital for treatment of sepsis. There, an orthopedic hand surgeon examined the child and determined that the lacerations were superficial and only required sutures. The orthopedist saw the infant a month later and believed there was no significant wrist injury.

When the child began preschool, she started to experience cold intolerance and difficulty writing with her right hand. The child was referred to a pediatric neurologist, who found no nerve damage and ordered occupational therapy.

The original orthopedic surgeon examined the child when she was 7 years old and determined that the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon had been completely severed with a partial injury to the ulnar nerve. He recommended a return visit at age 14 for full assessment of the wrist injury.

PARENTS’ CLAIM The ObGyn did not properly shield the fetus when performing the T-extension incision during cesarean delivery. The child’s weakness will increase with age, ruling out some occupations.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE The ObGyn was not negligent; she had provided adequate protection of the fetus during both incisions.

VERDICT An Illinois defense verdict was returned.

Woman dies after tubal ligation

After a 42-year-old woman underwent tubal ligation, her surgeon was concerned about a possible bowel perforation and admitted her to the hospital. The next morning, a computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen did not reveal bowel injury.

That afternoon, when the patient reported shortness of breath, the surgeon called the hospitalist with concern for pulmonary embolism (PE). The hospitalist immediately ordered a CT scan of the chest, initiated PE protocol, and wrote “r/o PE” on the chart. A radiologist reminded the hospitalist of the earlier CT scan with concern for kidney damage from another dye study. The hospitalist cancelled the CT scan and PE protocol. After waiting 17 hours to run any further tests, a CT scan revealed massive bilateral PE. The patient was transferred to the ICU, but died the next day.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The 17-hour delay was negligent.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE There was no negligence. The patient died of septic shock, not PE.

VERDICT A $4 million Virginia verdict was returned.

Child born without hand and forearm

During prenatal care, a mother underwent US at 20 and 36 weeks; both studies were reported as normal. The child was born missing his left hand and part of his left forearm due to a congenital amputation. The child will require prosthetics for life.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The condition should have been seen during prenatal US; an abortion was still an option at 20 weeks.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE US was properly performed and evaluated. It can be difficult to differentiate the right from left extremities.

VERDICT A California defense verdict was returned.

After starting Yasmin, woman has stroke with permanent paralysis: $16.5M total award

When a 37-year-old woman reported irregular menstruation, her ObGyn prescribed drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol (Yasmin; Bayer). Thirteen days after starting the drug, the patient had a stroke. She is paralyzed on her left side, has limited ability to speak, cannot use her left arm and leg, and requires 24-hour care.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The ObGyn should have recognized that Yasmin was not appropriate for this patient because of the drug’s clotting risks. The patient’s risk factors included her age (over 35), borderline hypertension, overweight, history of smoking, and high cholesterol. The ObGyn should have offered safer alternatives, such as a progesterone-only pill. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a safety warning that all drospirenone-containing drugs may be associated with a higher risk of venous thrombosis during the first 6 months of use.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE According to Bayer, Yasmin is safe, and remains on the market. It was an appropriate drug to treat her irregular bleeding.

VERDICT Claims against the medical center that referred the patient to the ObGyn were settled for $2.5 million before trial. A $14 million Illinois verdict was returned against the ObGyn, for a total award of $16.5 million.

Who is at fault when pelvic mesh erodes?

In January 2011, an ObGyn implanted the Gyne­care TVT Obturator System (TVT‑O; Ethicon) during a midurethral sling procedure to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in a woman in her 60s. Shortly thereafter, the ObGyn left practice because of early-onset Alzheimer’s disease, and the patient’s care was taken over by a gynecologist.

At the 2-month postoperative visit, the gynecologist found that the mesh had eroded into the patient’s vagina. The gynecologist simply cut the mesh with a scissor, charted that a small erosion was present, and prescribed estrogen cream.

The patient continued to report pain, discomfort, pressure, difficulty voiding urine, continued incontinence, vaginal discharge, scarring, infection, odor, and bleeding.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The polypropylene mesh used during the midurethral sling procedure has been shown to be incompatible with human tissue. It promotes an immune response, which stimulates degradation of the pelvic tissue and can contribute to the development of severe adverse reactions to the mesh. Ethicon negligently designed, manufactured, marketed, labeled, and packaged the pelvic mesh products.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE Proper warnings were provided about the health risks associated with polypropylene mesh products. The medical device was not properly sized.

VERDICT A Texas jury rejected the patient’s claims that Ethicon did not provide proper warnings about the sling’s health risks and declined to award punitive damages.

However, the jury decided that the mesh implant was defectively designed, and returned a $1.2 million verdict against Ethicon.

Was suspected bowel injury treated properly?

A 40-year-old woman was referred to an ObGyn after reporting abnormal uterine bleeding to her primary care physician. The patient had very light menses every few weeks. The ObGyn performed an ablation procedure, without relief. A month later, the ObGyn performed robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. The next day, the patient reported abdominal pain. Suspecting a bowel injury, the ObGyn ordered a CT scan; the bowel appeared normal, so the ObGyn referred the patient to a surgeon. During exploratory laparotomy, the surgeon found and repaired a bowel injury. The patient developed significant complications from a necrotizing infection that included respiratory distress and ongoing wound care.

PATIENT’S CLAIM Conservative treatment should have been offered before surgery. The ObGyn should have waited longer after the ablation procedure before doing the hysterectomy. The ObGyn should have checked for a possible bowel injury before closing the hysterectomy.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE The bowel injury is a known complication of the procedure and was recognized and repaired in a timely manner.

VERDICT A Kentucky defense verdict was returned.

Pap smear improperly interpreted: Woman dies from cervical cancer

A 37-year-old woman underwent a pap smear in 2008 that was read by a cytotechnologist as normal. Two years later, the patient was found to have a golf-ball–sized cancerous tumor. She died from cervical cancer in 2011.

ESTATE’S CLAIM The cytotechnologist was negligent in misreading the 2008 Pap smear. If treatment had been started in 2008, the cancer could have been resolved with a simple conization biopsy.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE The Pap smear interpretation was reasonable. The cancer could not have been diagnosed in 2008. The patient was at fault for failing to follow-up Pap smears during the next 2 years.

VERDICT After assigning 75% fault to the cytotechnologist and 25% fault to the patient, a Florida jury returned a $20,870,200 verdict, which was reduced to $15,816,699. 

Disastrous off-label use of anticoagulation

When a pelvic abscess was found, a 50-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital for treatment. She was taking warfarin due to a history of venous thromboembolism.

Before the procedure, her physicians attempted to temporarily reverse her anticoagulation by administering Factor IX Complex (Profilnine SD, Grifols Biologicals). The dose ordered for the patient was nearly double the maximum recommended weight-based dose. Almost immediately after receiving the infusion, the patient went into cardiopulmonary arrest and died. An autopsy found the cause of death to be pulmonary emboli (PE).

ESTATE’S CLAIM An excessive dose of Profilnine caused PE. At the time of the incident, Profilnine was not FDA approved for warfarin reversal, although some off-label uses were recognized in emergent situations, such as intracranial bleeds.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE The case was settled during the trial.

VERDICT A $1.25 million Virginia settlement was reached.

Vesicovaginal fistula from ureteral injury

At a women’s health clinic, a patient reported continuous, heavy vaginal bleeding; pain; and shortness of breath when walking. She had a history of endometritis and multiple abdominal surgeries. Examination disclosed a profuse vaginal discharge, a normal cervix, and an enlarged uterus. The patient consented to abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed by an ObGyn assisted by  a resident.

During surgery, the ObGyn found that the patient’s uterus was at 16 to 20 weeks’ gestation size, with multiple serosal uterine fibroids and frank pus and necrosed fibroid tumors within the uterine cavity. The procedure took longer than planned because of extensive adhesions. After surgery, the patient was anemic and was given a beta-blocker for tachycardia. She was discharged 3 days later with 48 hours’ worth of intravenous antibiotics.

A month later, the patient reported urinary incontinence. She saw a urologist, who found a vesicovaginal fistula. The patient underwent nephrostomy-tube placement. Right ureterolysis and a right ureteral reimplant was performed 4 months later.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The ObGyn injured the right ureter during surgery.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE The ureter injury is a known risk of the procedure. The injury was due to an infection or delayed effects of ischemia. The patient had a good recovery with no residual injury.

VERDICT A Michigan defense verdict was returned.

Why did mother die after delivering twins?

After a 35-year-old woman gave birth to twins by cesarean delivery, she died. At autopsy, 4 liters of blood were found in her abdomen.

ESTATE’S CLAIM The ObGyn failed to recognize and treat an arterial or venous bleed during surgery.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE The patient  died from amniotic fluid embolism. Autopsy results showed right ventricular heart failure, respiratory failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

VERDICT A Florida defense verdict was returned.  

These cases were selected by the editors of OBG Management from Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts, with permission of the editor, Lewis Laska (www.verdictslaska.com). The information available to the editors about the cases presented here is sometimes incomplete. Moreover, the cases may or may not have merit. Nevertheless, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation and are meant to illustrate nationwide variation in jury verdicts and awards.

Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Was fetus’ wrist injured during cesarean delivery?

At 34 weeks’ gestation, a 39-year-old woman went to the hospital in preterm labor. Her history included a prior cesarean delivery. Ultrasonography (US) showed that the fetus was in a double-footling breech position. The ObGyn decided to perform a cesarean delivery when the fetal heart-rate monitor indicated distress.

After making a midline incision through the earlier scar, the ObGyn created a low transverse uterine incision with a scalpel. The mother’s uterus was thick because labor had not progressed. When the ObGyn was unable to deliver the baby through the low transverse incision, she performed a T-extension of the incision using bandage scissors while placing her free hand inside the uterus to shield the fetus from injury. After extensive manipulation, the baby was delivered and immediately handed to a neonatologist. After surgery, the neonatologist told the mother that the baby had sustained two lacerations to the ulnar side of the right wrist. The newborn was airlifted to another hospital for treatment of sepsis. There, an orthopedic hand surgeon examined the child and determined that the lacerations were superficial and only required sutures. The orthopedist saw the infant a month later and believed there was no significant wrist injury.

When the child began preschool, she started to experience cold intolerance and difficulty writing with her right hand. The child was referred to a pediatric neurologist, who found no nerve damage and ordered occupational therapy.

The original orthopedic surgeon examined the child when she was 7 years old and determined that the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon had been completely severed with a partial injury to the ulnar nerve. He recommended a return visit at age 14 for full assessment of the wrist injury.

PARENTS’ CLAIM The ObGyn did not properly shield the fetus when performing the T-extension incision during cesarean delivery. The child’s weakness will increase with age, ruling out some occupations.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE The ObGyn was not negligent; she had provided adequate protection of the fetus during both incisions.

VERDICT An Illinois defense verdict was returned.

Woman dies after tubal ligation

After a 42-year-old woman underwent tubal ligation, her surgeon was concerned about a possible bowel perforation and admitted her to the hospital. The next morning, a computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen did not reveal bowel injury.

That afternoon, when the patient reported shortness of breath, the surgeon called the hospitalist with concern for pulmonary embolism (PE). The hospitalist immediately ordered a CT scan of the chest, initiated PE protocol, and wrote “r/o PE” on the chart. A radiologist reminded the hospitalist of the earlier CT scan with concern for kidney damage from another dye study. The hospitalist cancelled the CT scan and PE protocol. After waiting 17 hours to run any further tests, a CT scan revealed massive bilateral PE. The patient was transferred to the ICU, but died the next day.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The 17-hour delay was negligent.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE There was no negligence. The patient died of septic shock, not PE.

VERDICT A $4 million Virginia verdict was returned.

Child born without hand and forearm

During prenatal care, a mother underwent US at 20 and 36 weeks; both studies were reported as normal. The child was born missing his left hand and part of his left forearm due to a congenital amputation. The child will require prosthetics for life.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The condition should have been seen during prenatal US; an abortion was still an option at 20 weeks.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE US was properly performed and evaluated. It can be difficult to differentiate the right from left extremities.

VERDICT A California defense verdict was returned.

After starting Yasmin, woman has stroke with permanent paralysis: $16.5M total award

When a 37-year-old woman reported irregular menstruation, her ObGyn prescribed drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol (Yasmin; Bayer). Thirteen days after starting the drug, the patient had a stroke. She is paralyzed on her left side, has limited ability to speak, cannot use her left arm and leg, and requires 24-hour care.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The ObGyn should have recognized that Yasmin was not appropriate for this patient because of the drug’s clotting risks. The patient’s risk factors included her age (over 35), borderline hypertension, overweight, history of smoking, and high cholesterol. The ObGyn should have offered safer alternatives, such as a progesterone-only pill. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a safety warning that all drospirenone-containing drugs may be associated with a higher risk of venous thrombosis during the first 6 months of use.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE According to Bayer, Yasmin is safe, and remains on the market. It was an appropriate drug to treat her irregular bleeding.

VERDICT Claims against the medical center that referred the patient to the ObGyn were settled for $2.5 million before trial. A $14 million Illinois verdict was returned against the ObGyn, for a total award of $16.5 million.

Who is at fault when pelvic mesh erodes?

In January 2011, an ObGyn implanted the Gyne­care TVT Obturator System (TVT‑O; Ethicon) during a midurethral sling procedure to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in a woman in her 60s. Shortly thereafter, the ObGyn left practice because of early-onset Alzheimer’s disease, and the patient’s care was taken over by a gynecologist.

At the 2-month postoperative visit, the gynecologist found that the mesh had eroded into the patient’s vagina. The gynecologist simply cut the mesh with a scissor, charted that a small erosion was present, and prescribed estrogen cream.

The patient continued to report pain, discomfort, pressure, difficulty voiding urine, continued incontinence, vaginal discharge, scarring, infection, odor, and bleeding.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The polypropylene mesh used during the midurethral sling procedure has been shown to be incompatible with human tissue. It promotes an immune response, which stimulates degradation of the pelvic tissue and can contribute to the development of severe adverse reactions to the mesh. Ethicon negligently designed, manufactured, marketed, labeled, and packaged the pelvic mesh products.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE Proper warnings were provided about the health risks associated with polypropylene mesh products. The medical device was not properly sized.

VERDICT A Texas jury rejected the patient’s claims that Ethicon did not provide proper warnings about the sling’s health risks and declined to award punitive damages.

However, the jury decided that the mesh implant was defectively designed, and returned a $1.2 million verdict against Ethicon.

Was suspected bowel injury treated properly?

A 40-year-old woman was referred to an ObGyn after reporting abnormal uterine bleeding to her primary care physician. The patient had very light menses every few weeks. The ObGyn performed an ablation procedure, without relief. A month later, the ObGyn performed robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. The next day, the patient reported abdominal pain. Suspecting a bowel injury, the ObGyn ordered a CT scan; the bowel appeared normal, so the ObGyn referred the patient to a surgeon. During exploratory laparotomy, the surgeon found and repaired a bowel injury. The patient developed significant complications from a necrotizing infection that included respiratory distress and ongoing wound care.

PATIENT’S CLAIM Conservative treatment should have been offered before surgery. The ObGyn should have waited longer after the ablation procedure before doing the hysterectomy. The ObGyn should have checked for a possible bowel injury before closing the hysterectomy.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE The bowel injury is a known complication of the procedure and was recognized and repaired in a timely manner.

VERDICT A Kentucky defense verdict was returned.

Pap smear improperly interpreted: Woman dies from cervical cancer

A 37-year-old woman underwent a pap smear in 2008 that was read by a cytotechnologist as normal. Two years later, the patient was found to have a golf-ball–sized cancerous tumor. She died from cervical cancer in 2011.

ESTATE’S CLAIM The cytotechnologist was negligent in misreading the 2008 Pap smear. If treatment had been started in 2008, the cancer could have been resolved with a simple conization biopsy.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE The Pap smear interpretation was reasonable. The cancer could not have been diagnosed in 2008. The patient was at fault for failing to follow-up Pap smears during the next 2 years.

VERDICT After assigning 75% fault to the cytotechnologist and 25% fault to the patient, a Florida jury returned a $20,870,200 verdict, which was reduced to $15,816,699. 

Disastrous off-label use of anticoagulation

When a pelvic abscess was found, a 50-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital for treatment. She was taking warfarin due to a history of venous thromboembolism.

Before the procedure, her physicians attempted to temporarily reverse her anticoagulation by administering Factor IX Complex (Profilnine SD, Grifols Biologicals). The dose ordered for the patient was nearly double the maximum recommended weight-based dose. Almost immediately after receiving the infusion, the patient went into cardiopulmonary arrest and died. An autopsy found the cause of death to be pulmonary emboli (PE).

ESTATE’S CLAIM An excessive dose of Profilnine caused PE. At the time of the incident, Profilnine was not FDA approved for warfarin reversal, although some off-label uses were recognized in emergent situations, such as intracranial bleeds.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE The case was settled during the trial.

VERDICT A $1.25 million Virginia settlement was reached.

Vesicovaginal fistula from ureteral injury

At a women’s health clinic, a patient reported continuous, heavy vaginal bleeding; pain; and shortness of breath when walking. She had a history of endometritis and multiple abdominal surgeries. Examination disclosed a profuse vaginal discharge, a normal cervix, and an enlarged uterus. The patient consented to abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed by an ObGyn assisted by  a resident.

During surgery, the ObGyn found that the patient’s uterus was at 16 to 20 weeks’ gestation size, with multiple serosal uterine fibroids and frank pus and necrosed fibroid tumors within the uterine cavity. The procedure took longer than planned because of extensive adhesions. After surgery, the patient was anemic and was given a beta-blocker for tachycardia. She was discharged 3 days later with 48 hours’ worth of intravenous antibiotics.

A month later, the patient reported urinary incontinence. She saw a urologist, who found a vesicovaginal fistula. The patient underwent nephrostomy-tube placement. Right ureterolysis and a right ureteral reimplant was performed 4 months later.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The ObGyn injured the right ureter during surgery.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE The ureter injury is a known risk of the procedure. The injury was due to an infection or delayed effects of ischemia. The patient had a good recovery with no residual injury.

VERDICT A Michigan defense verdict was returned.

Why did mother die after delivering twins?

After a 35-year-old woman gave birth to twins by cesarean delivery, she died. At autopsy, 4 liters of blood were found in her abdomen.

ESTATE’S CLAIM The ObGyn failed to recognize and treat an arterial or venous bleed during surgery.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE The patient  died from amniotic fluid embolism. Autopsy results showed right ventricular heart failure, respiratory failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

VERDICT A Florida defense verdict was returned.  

These cases were selected by the editors of OBG Management from Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts, with permission of the editor, Lewis Laska (www.verdictslaska.com). The information available to the editors about the cases presented here is sometimes incomplete. Moreover, the cases may or may not have merit. Nevertheless, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation and are meant to illustrate nationwide variation in jury verdicts and awards.

Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) after a delivery involving shoulder dystocia is not only a clinical disaster—it constitutes the second largest category of litigation in obstetrics.¹

Lawsuits that center on NBPP often feature plaintiff expert witnesses who claim that the only way a permanent brachial plexus injury can occur is by a clinician applying “excessive” traction on the fetal head during delivery. The same experts often claim that the mother had multiple risk factors for shoulder dystocia and should never have been allowed a trial of labor in the first place.

The jury is left suspecting that the NBPP was a disaster waiting to happen, with warning signs that were ignored by the clinician. Jurors also may be convinced that, when the dystocia occurred, the defendant handled it badly, causing a severe, lifelong injury to the beautiful child whose images they are shown in the courtroom.

But this scenario is far from accurate.

ACOG publishes new guidance on NBPPThe American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) periodically issues practice bulletins on the subject of shoulder dystocia, the most recent one written in 2002 and reaffirmed in 2013.2 These bulletins are, of necessity, relatively brief summaries of current thinking about the causes, pathophysiology, treatment, and preventability of shoulder dystocia and associated brachial plexus injuries.

In 2011, James Breeden, MD, then president-elect of ACOG, called for formation of a task force on NBPP. The task force’s report, Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy,³ was published earlier this year and represents ACOG’s official position on the important—but still controversial—subjects of shoulder dystocia and NBPP. This report should serve not only to help clinicians better understand and manage these entities but also as a foundational document in the prolific and complex medicolegal suits involving them.

Given the length of this report, however, a concise summary of the key takeaways is in order.

NBPP and shoulder dystocia are not always linked

Early in the report, ACOG presents three very important statements, all of which challenge claims that are frequently made by plaintiffs in brachial plexus injury cases:

1. NBPP can occur without concomitant, clinically recognizable shoulder dystocia, although it often is associated with shoulder dystocia.
2. In the presence of shoulder dystocia, all ancillary maneuvers necessarily increase strain on the brachial plexus, no matter how expertly the maneuvers are performed.
3. Recent multidisciplinary research now indicates that the existence of NBPP after birth does not prove that exogenous forces are the sole cause of this injury.

These findings raise a number of questions, including:

• Can NBPP be predicted and prevented?
• What is the pathophysiologic mechanism for NBPP with and without shoulder dystocia?
• Are there specific interventions that may reduce the frequency of NBPP?

In Part 1 of this article, I summarize ACOG data on whether and how NBPP might be predicted. Part 2, to follow in October 2014, will discuss the pathophysiologic mechanism for NBPP and discuss potential interventions.

The data on NBPP without shoulder dystocia
The results of 12 reports published between 1990 and 2011 describe NBPP (temporary and persistent) that occurred without concomitant shoulder dystocia. These reports indicate that 46% of NBPP cases occurred without documented shoulder dystocia (0.9 ­cases/1,000 births).

Persistent NBPP. Two of these reports provide data on persistent NBPP without shoulder dystocia. Even when injury to the brachial plexus was documented as lasting more than 1 year, 26% of cases occurred in the absence of documented shoulder dystocia.

NBPP sometimes can occur during ­cesarean delivery. Four studies evaluated more than 240,000 births and found a rate of NBPP with cesarean delivery ranging from 0.3 to 1.5 cases per 1,000 live births.

All of these studies are described in the ACOG report.

When NBPP is related to shoulder dystocia
Shoulder dystocia may occur when there is a lack of fit of the transverse diameter of the fetal shoulders through the different pelvic diameters the shoulders encounter as they descend through the pelvis during the course of labor and delivery. This lack of fit can be related to excessive size of the fetal shoulders, inadequacy of pelvic dimensions to allow passage of a given fetus, or both. Abnormalities of fetal anatomy, fetal presentation, and soft tissue obstruction are rarely the cause of shoulder dystocia.

The difference between anterior shoulder obstruction behind the symphysis pubis and posterior shoulder obstruction from arrest at the level of the sacral promontory also is discussed in the ACOG report. In both cases, it is this obstruction of the affected shoulder while the long axis of the body continues to be pushed downward that widens the angle between the neck and impacted shoulder and stretches the brachial plexus.

The ACOG report acknowledges that may cases of NBPP do occur in conjunction with shoulder dystocia and that the same biomechanical factors that predispose a fetus to develop NBPP are associated with shoulder dystocia as well. However, the report takes pains to point out that the frequent conjunction of these two entities—NBPP and shoulder dystocia—may lead to an “erroneous retrospective inference of causation.”

Risk and predictive factors

The ACOG report states: “Various risk factors have been described in association with NBPP. Overall, however, these risk factors have not been shown to be statistically ­reliable or clinically useful predictors for...NBPP.”

For example, fetal macrosomia, defined as a birth weight of 4,000 g or more, has been reported as a risk factor for NBPP either alone or in conjunction with maternal diabetes. Although NBPP does occur more frequently as birth weight increases, seven studies over the past 20 years have shown that most cases of NBPP occur in infants of mothers without diabetes and in infants who weigh less than 4,000 g.

Other studies have shown that, if cesarean delivery were performed in cases of suspected macrosomia, it would have only a limited effect on reducing the incidence of NBPP. Specifically, in women with diabetes who have an estimated fetal weight of more than 4,500 g, the positive predictive value for NBPP is only 5%. Without maternal diabetes, that figure is less than 2%.

Estimating fetal weight by ultrasound does not significantly enhance our ability to predict NBPP. Ultrasound estimates of birth weight usually fall within 15% to 20% of actual birth weight, and the sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting birth weights more than 4,500 g is only 40%.

Therefore, ultrasound estimates of birth weight are of limited utility for contemporaneous clinical management. Furthermore, no data exist to support the claim that estimated fetal weight can be used prophylactically to reduce the incidence of NBPP.

Recurrent shoulder dystocia may be predictive of future NBPP
Whether studied alone or with NBPP, risk factors for shoulder dystocia are not reliable predictors of its occurrence. This is not the case, however, for recurrent shoulder dystocia, where the risk of neonatal brachial plexus palsy can be as high as 4.5%, compared with 1% to 2% for a first episode of shoulder dystocia.

C5 and C6 roots merge to form the upper trunk, C7 root forms the middle trunk, and C8 and T1 roots merge to form the lower trunk.

The frequency of NBPP is “rare,” according to the ACOG report, which cites a rate of 1.5 cases for every 1,000 births. Favorable outcomes with complete recovery are estimated to range from 50% to 80%.3

Brachial plexus injuries are classically defined as Erb’s palsy—involving C5 and C6 nerve roots—or Klumpke’s palsy, in which there is damage to the C8 and T1 nerve roots.

Erb’s palsy is recognizable by the characteristic “waiter’s tip” position of the hand, which is caused by muscle imbalance in the shoulder and upper arm. Most NBPP injuries are Erb’s palsy, which affect 1.2 infants in every 1,000 births.

Klumpke’s palsy results in weakness of the hand and medial forearm muscles. It affects 0.05 infants in every 1,000 births. The remaining cases involve a combination of the two types of palsy.

These injuries can be temporary, resolving by 12 months after birth, or permanent. The rate of persistence of NBPP at 12 months ranges from 3% to 33%.

Can clinician maneuvers increase the likelihood of NBPP?

The ACOG report addresses the direction and angle of clinician traction at delivery. The report confirms what clinicians generally have been taught: The application of fundal pressure during a delivery in which shoulder dystocia is recognized can exacerbate shoulder impaction and can lead to an increased risk of NBPP.

Traction applied by the clinician and lateral bending of the fetal neck often are implicated as causative factors of NBPP. However, ACOG presents evidence that NBPP can occur entirely unrelated to clinician traction. The report cites studies involving both transient and persistent NBPP in fetuses delivered vaginally without evident shoulder dystocia. The same types of injury are sometimes seen in fetuses delivered by cesarean, as has been mentioned.

The report goes on to state:

Recommendations for practice

At the close of its second chapter (“Risk and predictive factors”), the ACOG report offers the same official recommendations that appear in its current practice bulletin on shoulder dystocia. It notes that there are three clinical situations in which it may be ­prudent to alter usual obstetric management, with an aim of reducing the risk of shoulder dystocia and NBPP:

• when fetal macrosomia is suspected, with fetal weight estimated to exceed 5,000 g in a woman without diabetes or 4,500 g in a woman with diabetes
• when the mother has a history of recognized shoulder dystocia, especially when neonatal injury was severe
• when midpelvic operative vaginal delivery is contemplated with a fetus estimated to weigh more than 4,000 g.

It is interesting to note that these recommendations are made, according to the report, “notwithstanding the unreliability of specific risk factors to predict NBPP or clinically apparent shoulder dystocia in a specific case.” The report further adds:

More to come

For ACOG’s conclusions on the pathophysiology and causation of NBPP, with a view toward formulating specific protective interventions, see Part 2 of this article, which will appear in the October 2014 issue of OBG Management.

Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) after a delivery involving shoulder dystocia is not only a clinical disaster—it constitutes the second largest category of litigation in obstetrics.¹

Lawsuits that center on NBPP often feature plaintiff expert witnesses who claim that the only way a permanent brachial plexus injury can occur is by a clinician applying “excessive” traction on the fetal head during delivery. The same experts often claim that the mother had multiple risk factors for shoulder dystocia and should never have been allowed a trial of labor in the first place.

The jury is left suspecting that the NBPP was a disaster waiting to happen, with warning signs that were ignored by the clinician. Jurors also may be convinced that, when the dystocia occurred, the defendant handled it badly, causing a severe, lifelong injury to the beautiful child whose images they are shown in the courtroom.

But this scenario is far from accurate.

ACOG publishes new guidance on NBPPThe American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) periodically issues practice bulletins on the subject of shoulder dystocia, the most recent one written in 2002 and reaffirmed in 2013.2 These bulletins are, of necessity, relatively brief summaries of current thinking about the causes, pathophysiology, treatment, and preventability of shoulder dystocia and associated brachial plexus injuries.

In 2011, James Breeden, MD, then president-elect of ACOG, called for formation of a task force on NBPP. The task force’s report, Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy,³ was published earlier this year and represents ACOG’s official position on the important—but still controversial—subjects of shoulder dystocia and NBPP. This report should serve not only to help clinicians better understand and manage these entities but also as a foundational document in the prolific and complex medicolegal suits involving them.

Given the length of this report, however, a concise summary of the key takeaways is in order.

NBPP and shoulder dystocia are not always linked

Early in the report, ACOG presents three very important statements, all of which challenge claims that are frequently made by plaintiffs in brachial plexus injury cases:

1. NBPP can occur without concomitant, clinically recognizable shoulder dystocia, although it often is associated with shoulder dystocia.
2. In the presence of shoulder dystocia, all ancillary maneuvers necessarily increase strain on the brachial plexus, no matter how expertly the maneuvers are performed.
3. Recent multidisciplinary research now indicates that the existence of NBPP after birth does not prove that exogenous forces are the sole cause of this injury.

These findings raise a number of questions, including:

• Can NBPP be predicted and prevented?
• What is the pathophysiologic mechanism for NBPP with and without shoulder dystocia?
• Are there specific interventions that may reduce the frequency of NBPP?

In Part 1 of this article, I summarize ACOG data on whether and how NBPP might be predicted. Part 2, to follow in October 2014, will discuss the pathophysiologic mechanism for NBPP and discuss potential interventions.

The data on NBPP without shoulder dystocia
The results of 12 reports published between 1990 and 2011 describe NBPP (temporary and persistent) that occurred without concomitant shoulder dystocia. These reports indicate that 46% of NBPP cases occurred without documented shoulder dystocia (0.9 ­cases/1,000 births).

Persistent NBPP. Two of these reports provide data on persistent NBPP without shoulder dystocia. Even when injury to the brachial plexus was documented as lasting more than 1 year, 26% of cases occurred in the absence of documented shoulder dystocia.

NBPP sometimes can occur during ­cesarean delivery. Four studies evaluated more than 240,000 births and found a rate of NBPP with cesarean delivery ranging from 0.3 to 1.5 cases per 1,000 live births.

All of these studies are described in the ACOG report.

When NBPP is related to shoulder dystocia
Shoulder dystocia may occur when there is a lack of fit of the transverse diameter of the fetal shoulders through the different pelvic diameters the shoulders encounter as they descend through the pelvis during the course of labor and delivery. This lack of fit can be related to excessive size of the fetal shoulders, inadequacy of pelvic dimensions to allow passage of a given fetus, or both. Abnormalities of fetal anatomy, fetal presentation, and soft tissue obstruction are rarely the cause of shoulder dystocia.

The difference between anterior shoulder obstruction behind the symphysis pubis and posterior shoulder obstruction from arrest at the level of the sacral promontory also is discussed in the ACOG report. In both cases, it is this obstruction of the affected shoulder while the long axis of the body continues to be pushed downward that widens the angle between the neck and impacted shoulder and stretches the brachial plexus.

The ACOG report acknowledges that may cases of NBPP do occur in conjunction with shoulder dystocia and that the same biomechanical factors that predispose a fetus to develop NBPP are associated with shoulder dystocia as well. However, the report takes pains to point out that the frequent conjunction of these two entities—NBPP and shoulder dystocia—may lead to an “erroneous retrospective inference of causation.”

Risk and predictive factors

The ACOG report states: “Various risk factors have been described in association with NBPP. Overall, however, these risk factors have not been shown to be statistically ­reliable or clinically useful predictors for...NBPP.”

For example, fetal macrosomia, defined as a birth weight of 4,000 g or more, has been reported as a risk factor for NBPP either alone or in conjunction with maternal diabetes. Although NBPP does occur more frequently as birth weight increases, seven studies over the past 20 years have shown that most cases of NBPP occur in infants of mothers without diabetes and in infants who weigh less than 4,000 g.

Other studies have shown that, if cesarean delivery were performed in cases of suspected macrosomia, it would have only a limited effect on reducing the incidence of NBPP. Specifically, in women with diabetes who have an estimated fetal weight of more than 4,500 g, the positive predictive value for NBPP is only 5%. Without maternal diabetes, that figure is less than 2%.

Estimating fetal weight by ultrasound does not significantly enhance our ability to predict NBPP. Ultrasound estimates of birth weight usually fall within 15% to 20% of actual birth weight, and the sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting birth weights more than 4,500 g is only 40%.

Therefore, ultrasound estimates of birth weight are of limited utility for contemporaneous clinical management. Furthermore, no data exist to support the claim that estimated fetal weight can be used prophylactically to reduce the incidence of NBPP.

Recurrent shoulder dystocia may be predictive of future NBPP
Whether studied alone or with NBPP, risk factors for shoulder dystocia are not reliable predictors of its occurrence. This is not the case, however, for recurrent shoulder dystocia, where the risk of neonatal brachial plexus palsy can be as high as 4.5%, compared with 1% to 2% for a first episode of shoulder dystocia.

C5 and C6 roots merge to form the upper trunk, C7 root forms the middle trunk, and C8 and T1 roots merge to form the lower trunk.

The frequency of NBPP is “rare,” according to the ACOG report, which cites a rate of 1.5 cases for every 1,000 births. Favorable outcomes with complete recovery are estimated to range from 50% to 80%.3

Brachial plexus injuries are classically defined as Erb’s palsy—involving C5 and C6 nerve roots—or Klumpke’s palsy, in which there is damage to the C8 and T1 nerve roots.

Erb’s palsy is recognizable by the characteristic “waiter’s tip” position of the hand, which is caused by muscle imbalance in the shoulder and upper arm. Most NBPP injuries are Erb’s palsy, which affect 1.2 infants in every 1,000 births.

Klumpke’s palsy results in weakness of the hand and medial forearm muscles. It affects 0.05 infants in every 1,000 births. The remaining cases involve a combination of the two types of palsy.

These injuries can be temporary, resolving by 12 months after birth, or permanent. The rate of persistence of NBPP at 12 months ranges from 3% to 33%.

Can clinician maneuvers increase the likelihood of NBPP?

The ACOG report addresses the direction and angle of clinician traction at delivery. The report confirms what clinicians generally have been taught: The application of fundal pressure during a delivery in which shoulder dystocia is recognized can exacerbate shoulder impaction and can lead to an increased risk of NBPP.

Traction applied by the clinician and lateral bending of the fetal neck often are implicated as causative factors of NBPP. However, ACOG presents evidence that NBPP can occur entirely unrelated to clinician traction. The report cites studies involving both transient and persistent NBPP in fetuses delivered vaginally without evident shoulder dystocia. The same types of injury are sometimes seen in fetuses delivered by cesarean, as has been mentioned.

The report goes on to state:

Recommendations for practice

At the close of its second chapter (“Risk and predictive factors”), the ACOG report offers the same official recommendations that appear in its current practice bulletin on shoulder dystocia. It notes that there are three clinical situations in which it may be ­prudent to alter usual obstetric management, with an aim of reducing the risk of shoulder dystocia and NBPP:

• when fetal macrosomia is suspected, with fetal weight estimated to exceed 5,000 g in a woman without diabetes or 4,500 g in a woman with diabetes
• when the mother has a history of recognized shoulder dystocia, especially when neonatal injury was severe
• when midpelvic operative vaginal delivery is contemplated with a fetus estimated to weigh more than 4,000 g.

It is interesting to note that these recommendations are made, according to the report, “notwithstanding the unreliability of specific risk factors to predict NBPP or clinically apparent shoulder dystocia in a specific case.” The report further adds:

More to come

For ACOG’s conclusions on the pathophysiology and causation of NBPP, with a view toward formulating specific protective interventions, see Part 2 of this article, which will appear in the October 2014 issue of OBG Management.

Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) after a delivery involving shoulder dystocia is not only a clinical disaster—it constitutes the second largest category of litigation in obstetrics.¹

Lawsuits that center on NBPP often feature plaintiff expert witnesses who claim that the only way a permanent brachial plexus injury can occur is by a clinician applying “excessive” traction on the fetal head during delivery. The same experts often claim that the mother had multiple risk factors for shoulder dystocia and should never have been allowed a trial of labor in the first place.

The jury is left suspecting that the NBPP was a disaster waiting to happen, with warning signs that were ignored by the clinician. Jurors also may be convinced that, when the dystocia occurred, the defendant handled it badly, causing a severe, lifelong injury to the beautiful child whose images they are shown in the courtroom.

But this scenario is far from accurate.

ACOG publishes new guidance on NBPPThe American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) periodically issues practice bulletins on the subject of shoulder dystocia, the most recent one written in 2002 and reaffirmed in 2013.2 These bulletins are, of necessity, relatively brief summaries of current thinking about the causes, pathophysiology, treatment, and preventability of shoulder dystocia and associated brachial plexus injuries.

In 2011, James Breeden, MD, then president-elect of ACOG, called for formation of a task force on NBPP. The task force’s report, Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy,³ was published earlier this year and represents ACOG’s official position on the important—but still controversial—subjects of shoulder dystocia and NBPP. This report should serve not only to help clinicians better understand and manage these entities but also as a foundational document in the prolific and complex medicolegal suits involving them.

Given the length of this report, however, a concise summary of the key takeaways is in order.

NBPP and shoulder dystocia are not always linked

Early in the report, ACOG presents three very important statements, all of which challenge claims that are frequently made by plaintiffs in brachial plexus injury cases:

1. NBPP can occur without concomitant, clinically recognizable shoulder dystocia, although it often is associated with shoulder dystocia.
2. In the presence of shoulder dystocia, all ancillary maneuvers necessarily increase strain on the brachial plexus, no matter how expertly the maneuvers are performed.
3. Recent multidisciplinary research now indicates that the existence of NBPP after birth does not prove that exogenous forces are the sole cause of this injury.

These findings raise a number of questions, including:

• Can NBPP be predicted and prevented?
• What is the pathophysiologic mechanism for NBPP with and without shoulder dystocia?
• Are there specific interventions that may reduce the frequency of NBPP?

In Part 1 of this article, I summarize ACOG data on whether and how NBPP might be predicted. Part 2, to follow in October 2014, will discuss the pathophysiologic mechanism for NBPP and discuss potential interventions.

The data on NBPP without shoulder dystocia
The results of 12 reports published between 1990 and 2011 describe NBPP (temporary and persistent) that occurred without concomitant shoulder dystocia. These reports indicate that 46% of NBPP cases occurred without documented shoulder dystocia (0.9 ­cases/1,000 births).

Persistent NBPP. Two of these reports provide data on persistent NBPP without shoulder dystocia. Even when injury to the brachial plexus was documented as lasting more than 1 year, 26% of cases occurred in the absence of documented shoulder dystocia.

NBPP sometimes can occur during ­cesarean delivery. Four studies evaluated more than 240,000 births and found a rate of NBPP with cesarean delivery ranging from 0.3 to 1.5 cases per 1,000 live births.

All of these studies are described in the ACOG report.

When NBPP is related to shoulder dystocia
Shoulder dystocia may occur when there is a lack of fit of the transverse diameter of the fetal shoulders through the different pelvic diameters the shoulders encounter as they descend through the pelvis during the course of labor and delivery. This lack of fit can be related to excessive size of the fetal shoulders, inadequacy of pelvic dimensions to allow passage of a given fetus, or both. Abnormalities of fetal anatomy, fetal presentation, and soft tissue obstruction are rarely the cause of shoulder dystocia.

The difference between anterior shoulder obstruction behind the symphysis pubis and posterior shoulder obstruction from arrest at the level of the sacral promontory also is discussed in the ACOG report. In both cases, it is this obstruction of the affected shoulder while the long axis of the body continues to be pushed downward that widens the angle between the neck and impacted shoulder and stretches the brachial plexus.

The ACOG report acknowledges that may cases of NBPP do occur in conjunction with shoulder dystocia and that the same biomechanical factors that predispose a fetus to develop NBPP are associated with shoulder dystocia as well. However, the report takes pains to point out that the frequent conjunction of these two entities—NBPP and shoulder dystocia—may lead to an “erroneous retrospective inference of causation.”

Risk and predictive factors

The ACOG report states: “Various risk factors have been described in association with NBPP. Overall, however, these risk factors have not been shown to be statistically ­reliable or clinically useful predictors for...NBPP.”

For example, fetal macrosomia, defined as a birth weight of 4,000 g or more, has been reported as a risk factor for NBPP either alone or in conjunction with maternal diabetes. Although NBPP does occur more frequently as birth weight increases, seven studies over the past 20 years have shown that most cases of NBPP occur in infants of mothers without diabetes and in infants who weigh less than 4,000 g.

Other studies have shown that, if cesarean delivery were performed in cases of suspected macrosomia, it would have only a limited effect on reducing the incidence of NBPP. Specifically, in women with diabetes who have an estimated fetal weight of more than 4,500 g, the positive predictive value for NBPP is only 5%. Without maternal diabetes, that figure is less than 2%.

Estimating fetal weight by ultrasound does not significantly enhance our ability to predict NBPP. Ultrasound estimates of birth weight usually fall within 15% to 20% of actual birth weight, and the sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting birth weights more than 4,500 g is only 40%.

Therefore, ultrasound estimates of birth weight are of limited utility for contemporaneous clinical management. Furthermore, no data exist to support the claim that estimated fetal weight can be used prophylactically to reduce the incidence of NBPP.

Recurrent shoulder dystocia may be predictive of future NBPP
Whether studied alone or with NBPP, risk factors for shoulder dystocia are not reliable predictors of its occurrence. This is not the case, however, for recurrent shoulder dystocia, where the risk of neonatal brachial plexus palsy can be as high as 4.5%, compared with 1% to 2% for a first episode of shoulder dystocia.

C5 and C6 roots merge to form the upper trunk, C7 root forms the middle trunk, and C8 and T1 roots merge to form the lower trunk.

The frequency of NBPP is “rare,” according to the ACOG report, which cites a rate of 1.5 cases for every 1,000 births. Favorable outcomes with complete recovery are estimated to range from 50% to 80%.3

Brachial plexus injuries are classically defined as Erb’s palsy—involving C5 and C6 nerve roots—or Klumpke’s palsy, in which there is damage to the C8 and T1 nerve roots.

Erb’s palsy is recognizable by the characteristic “waiter’s tip” position of the hand, which is caused by muscle imbalance in the shoulder and upper arm. Most NBPP injuries are Erb’s palsy, which affect 1.2 infants in every 1,000 births.

Klumpke’s palsy results in weakness of the hand and medial forearm muscles. It affects 0.05 infants in every 1,000 births. The remaining cases involve a combination of the two types of palsy.

These injuries can be temporary, resolving by 12 months after birth, or permanent. The rate of persistence of NBPP at 12 months ranges from 3% to 33%.

Can clinician maneuvers increase the likelihood of NBPP?

The ACOG report addresses the direction and angle of clinician traction at delivery. The report confirms what clinicians generally have been taught: The application of fundal pressure during a delivery in which shoulder dystocia is recognized can exacerbate shoulder impaction and can lead to an increased risk of NBPP.

Traction applied by the clinician and lateral bending of the fetal neck often are implicated as causative factors of NBPP. However, ACOG presents evidence that NBPP can occur entirely unrelated to clinician traction. The report cites studies involving both transient and persistent NBPP in fetuses delivered vaginally without evident shoulder dystocia. The same types of injury are sometimes seen in fetuses delivered by cesarean, as has been mentioned.

The report goes on to state:

Recommendations for practice

At the close of its second chapter (“Risk and predictive factors”), the ACOG report offers the same official recommendations that appear in its current practice bulletin on shoulder dystocia. It notes that there are three clinical situations in which it may be ­prudent to alter usual obstetric management, with an aim of reducing the risk of shoulder dystocia and NBPP:

• when fetal macrosomia is suspected, with fetal weight estimated to exceed 5,000 g in a woman without diabetes or 4,500 g in a woman with diabetes
• when the mother has a history of recognized shoulder dystocia, especially when neonatal injury was severe
• when midpelvic operative vaginal delivery is contemplated with a fetus estimated to weigh more than 4,000 g.

It is interesting to note that these recommendations are made, according to the report, “notwithstanding the unreliability of specific risk factors to predict NBPP or clinically apparent shoulder dystocia in a specific case.” The report further adds:

More to come

For ACOG’s conclusions on the pathophysiology and causation of NBPP, with a view toward formulating specific protective interventions, see Part 2 of this article, which will appear in the October 2014 issue of OBG Management.

Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Suddenly, indigo carmine is in short supply throughout the United States. One manufacturer has stopped production because of a raw materials shortage; another is experiencing manufacturing delays. Neither company can estimate a resupply or product return date.¹

Indigo carmine is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to localize ureteral orifices during cystoscopy and is commonly used in obstetrics and gynecology as a marker dye in the following additional situations:

• administered in a dilute solution via a catheter to back fill the bladder and test for bladder injury
• administered via a cannula in the uterine cavity to test the patency of the fallopian tubes
• injected into the amniotic fluid compartment to test for premature rupture of the membranes (PROM)
• injected into the amniotic fluid of a twin gestation to mark the amniotic fluid of one twin.

With this agent in short supply, we need to identify alternative marker dyes to use in our clinical practice. In this editorial, I provide a list of possible options to replace indigo carmine. Evidence supporting the use and safety of marker dyes in obstetrics and gynecology is based on small cohorts or case reports. The available evidence is of modest to low quality, and it is especially challenging to identify uncommon adverse effects. Consequently, expert opinion guides most practice recommendations.

Options to test the function of the ureters at cystoscopy
Given the lack of availability of indigo carmine, I recommend one of the following three options to test the function of the ureters at cystoscopy.

Partially fill the bladder with a solution of either sterile water or a 10% dextrose solution. (Experienced surgeons may prefer to use saline.) The turbulence of the interaction between the ureteral urine jet and instilled fluid in the bladder may permit visualization of the urine stream exiting the ureteral orifices as it swirls through the sterile water or dextrose solution. Both sterile water and a 10% dextrose solution offer a contrast in viscosity between the urine and the cystoscopy fluid, which may enhance the ability to detect the urine jet leaving the ureter.²

Administer IV methylene blue. Methylene blue is FDA approved for methemoglobinemia treatment. For this indication, it is administered intravenously at a dose of 1 to 2 mg/kgover 5 to 10 minutes. Paradoxically, when administered at a dose of >7 mg/kg, methylene blue can cause methemoglobinemia.³

Methylene blue often is provided as a 1% solution of 10 mg/mL in 10-mL vials. To use intravenous (IV) methylene blue to test ureteral function at cystoscopy, administer IV methylene blue 50 mg over 5 minutes. Use the cystoscope to view the colored urine exiting the ureteral orifices.^4,5 Administering a small dose of IV furosemide may accelerate the appearance of methylene blue in the urine.

When to use caution. Methylene blue blocks serotonin metabolism by inhibiting monoamine oxidase and may precipitate a serotonin syndrome in patients taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), or monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs).

Common findings in the serotonin syndrome include: temperature above 38° C (100.4° F), anxiety, agitation, delirium, clonus, tremor, and hypertonia.⁶ I recommend that you DO NOT use IV methylene blue in patients taking these medications.^7,8

Great caution should be used before administering IV methylene blue in the presence of the following clinical situations:

• renal impairment  
• G6PD deficiency
• pediatric patients.

Methylene blue never should be given by a subcutaneous or intrathecal route. In pregnant women it should never be injected into the amniotic fluid compartment.

Use preoperative oral phenazo-pyridine. If the preoperative plan includes a cystoscopy procedure to test ureteral function, administering oral phenazopyridine in the preoperative holding area will result in colorization of the urine within 30 minutes, and it will persist for approximately 4 to 5 hours. To use this approach, administer one dose of phenazopyridine (Pyridium, Azo-Gesic), 100 mg or 200 mg orally, 30 minutes to 1 hour before the planned surgical start time, in the preoperative holding area.⁹ During cystoscopy, the urine from the ureteral jet will be colored orange.

When to use caution. Phenazo­pyridine should not be administered to patients with G6PD deficiency.

Option to test for bladder injury
Methylene blue. If methylene blue is used to test the integrity of the bladder, I recommend diluting 10 mg methylene blue in 1 L normal saline and then instilling the dilute solution through a catheter into the bladder.¹⁰

It is unlikely that this technique will be associated with sufficient methylene blue absorption to cause a serotonin syndrome. Therefore, this technique can be used in patients taking SSRIs, SNRIs, and MAOIs.

Option to test patency of the fallopian tubes (chromopertubation)
Methylene blue. If methylene blue is used via a cannula in the uterine cavity to test the patency of the fallopian tubes, I recommend diluting 10 mg methylene blue in 150 mL normal saline and using the dilute solution to test tubal patency.

It is unlikely that this process will lead to sufficient methylene blue absorption to cause a serotonin syndrome. Therefore, this technique can be used in patients taking SSRIs, SNRIs and MAOIs. However, if intrauterine injection of the dilute dye solution results in extravasation of the dye into the pelvic veins, a significant amount of dye can enter the circulation.¹¹ There are case reports of anaphylaxis following intrauterine injection of methylene blue to test tubal patency.^12,13

Options to diagnose PROM and to use for twin amniocentesis
None. Most experts recommend against the intra-amniotic injection of methylene blue to diagnose PROM or in twin amniocentesis procedures. Methylene blue injected into the intra-amniotic fluid during amniocentesis in multiple gestations has been reported to cause fetal bowel obstruction or atresia.^14,15 Fetal death also has been reported.¹⁶ Decades ago, indocyanine green, which is FDA approved to determine cardiac output, liver blood flow, and hepatic function, was reported to be useful to mark one sac of a twin gestation during amniocentesis.¹⁷ With modern ultrasonography technology, the need to rely on a dye to mark a sac of a twin has decreased significantly.

Our only option is to cope—effectively as possible Over decades, the medical community develops patterns of patient care that are critically dependent on the availability of key pharmaceuticals and devices. When a pharmaceutical or device suddenly becomes unavailable, it can disrupt important patterns of patient care. Imagine the impact on obstetrics practice if oxytocin became unavailable due to manufacturing shortages. Likely, both market forces and government regulation are the root cause of the shortfalls. Preventing the adverse consequences of the sudden loss of key pharmaceuticals and devices is an important priority to ensure optimal care of our patients.

Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Suddenly, indigo carmine is in short supply throughout the United States. One manufacturer has stopped production because of a raw materials shortage; another is experiencing manufacturing delays. Neither company can estimate a resupply or product return date.¹

Indigo carmine is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to localize ureteral orifices during cystoscopy and is commonly used in obstetrics and gynecology as a marker dye in the following additional situations:

• administered in a dilute solution via a catheter to back fill the bladder and test for bladder injury
• administered via a cannula in the uterine cavity to test the patency of the fallopian tubes
• injected into the amniotic fluid compartment to test for premature rupture of the membranes (PROM)
• injected into the amniotic fluid of a twin gestation to mark the amniotic fluid of one twin.

With this agent in short supply, we need to identify alternative marker dyes to use in our clinical practice. In this editorial, I provide a list of possible options to replace indigo carmine. Evidence supporting the use and safety of marker dyes in obstetrics and gynecology is based on small cohorts or case reports. The available evidence is of modest to low quality, and it is especially challenging to identify uncommon adverse effects. Consequently, expert opinion guides most practice recommendations.

Options to test the function of the ureters at cystoscopy
Given the lack of availability of indigo carmine, I recommend one of the following three options to test the function of the ureters at cystoscopy.

Partially fill the bladder with a solution of either sterile water or a 10% dextrose solution. (Experienced surgeons may prefer to use saline.) The turbulence of the interaction between the ureteral urine jet and instilled fluid in the bladder may permit visualization of the urine stream exiting the ureteral orifices as it swirls through the sterile water or dextrose solution. Both sterile water and a 10% dextrose solution offer a contrast in viscosity between the urine and the cystoscopy fluid, which may enhance the ability to detect the urine jet leaving the ureter.²

Administer IV methylene blue. Methylene blue is FDA approved for methemoglobinemia treatment. For this indication, it is administered intravenously at a dose of 1 to 2 mg/kgover 5 to 10 minutes. Paradoxically, when administered at a dose of >7 mg/kg, methylene blue can cause methemoglobinemia.³

Methylene blue often is provided as a 1% solution of 10 mg/mL in 10-mL vials. To use intravenous (IV) methylene blue to test ureteral function at cystoscopy, administer IV methylene blue 50 mg over 5 minutes. Use the cystoscope to view the colored urine exiting the ureteral orifices.^4,5 Administering a small dose of IV furosemide may accelerate the appearance of methylene blue in the urine.

When to use caution. Methylene blue blocks serotonin metabolism by inhibiting monoamine oxidase and may precipitate a serotonin syndrome in patients taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), or monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs).

Common findings in the serotonin syndrome include: temperature above 38° C (100.4° F), anxiety, agitation, delirium, clonus, tremor, and hypertonia.⁶ I recommend that you DO NOT use IV methylene blue in patients taking these medications.^7,8

Great caution should be used before administering IV methylene blue in the presence of the following clinical situations:

• renal impairment  
• G6PD deficiency
• pediatric patients.

Methylene blue never should be given by a subcutaneous or intrathecal route. In pregnant women it should never be injected into the amniotic fluid compartment.

Use preoperative oral phenazo-pyridine. If the preoperative plan includes a cystoscopy procedure to test ureteral function, administering oral phenazopyridine in the preoperative holding area will result in colorization of the urine within 30 minutes, and it will persist for approximately 4 to 5 hours. To use this approach, administer one dose of phenazopyridine (Pyridium, Azo-Gesic), 100 mg or 200 mg orally, 30 minutes to 1 hour before the planned surgical start time, in the preoperative holding area.⁹ During cystoscopy, the urine from the ureteral jet will be colored orange.

When to use caution. Phenazo­pyridine should not be administered to patients with G6PD deficiency.

Option to test for bladder injury
Methylene blue. If methylene blue is used to test the integrity of the bladder, I recommend diluting 10 mg methylene blue in 1 L normal saline and then instilling the dilute solution through a catheter into the bladder.¹⁰

It is unlikely that this technique will be associated with sufficient methylene blue absorption to cause a serotonin syndrome. Therefore, this technique can be used in patients taking SSRIs, SNRIs, and MAOIs.

Option to test patency of the fallopian tubes (chromopertubation)
Methylene blue. If methylene blue is used via a cannula in the uterine cavity to test the patency of the fallopian tubes, I recommend diluting 10 mg methylene blue in 150 mL normal saline and using the dilute solution to test tubal patency.

It is unlikely that this process will lead to sufficient methylene blue absorption to cause a serotonin syndrome. Therefore, this technique can be used in patients taking SSRIs, SNRIs and MAOIs. However, if intrauterine injection of the dilute dye solution results in extravasation of the dye into the pelvic veins, a significant amount of dye can enter the circulation.¹¹ There are case reports of anaphylaxis following intrauterine injection of methylene blue to test tubal patency.^12,13

Options to diagnose PROM and to use for twin amniocentesis
None. Most experts recommend against the intra-amniotic injection of methylene blue to diagnose PROM or in twin amniocentesis procedures. Methylene blue injected into the intra-amniotic fluid during amniocentesis in multiple gestations has been reported to cause fetal bowel obstruction or atresia.^14,15 Fetal death also has been reported.¹⁶ Decades ago, indocyanine green, which is FDA approved to determine cardiac output, liver blood flow, and hepatic function, was reported to be useful to mark one sac of a twin gestation during amniocentesis.¹⁷ With modern ultrasonography technology, the need to rely on a dye to mark a sac of a twin has decreased significantly.

Our only option is to cope—effectively as possible Over decades, the medical community develops patterns of patient care that are critically dependent on the availability of key pharmaceuticals and devices. When a pharmaceutical or device suddenly becomes unavailable, it can disrupt important patterns of patient care. Imagine the impact on obstetrics practice if oxytocin became unavailable due to manufacturing shortages. Likely, both market forces and government regulation are the root cause of the shortfalls. Preventing the adverse consequences of the sudden loss of key pharmaceuticals and devices is an important priority to ensure optimal care of our patients.

Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Suddenly, indigo carmine is in short supply throughout the United States. One manufacturer has stopped production because of a raw materials shortage; another is experiencing manufacturing delays. Neither company can estimate a resupply or product return date.¹

Indigo carmine is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to localize ureteral orifices during cystoscopy and is commonly used in obstetrics and gynecology as a marker dye in the following additional situations:

• administered in a dilute solution via a catheter to back fill the bladder and test for bladder injury
• administered via a cannula in the uterine cavity to test the patency of the fallopian tubes
• injected into the amniotic fluid compartment to test for premature rupture of the membranes (PROM)
• injected into the amniotic fluid of a twin gestation to mark the amniotic fluid of one twin.

With this agent in short supply, we need to identify alternative marker dyes to use in our clinical practice. In this editorial, I provide a list of possible options to replace indigo carmine. Evidence supporting the use and safety of marker dyes in obstetrics and gynecology is based on small cohorts or case reports. The available evidence is of modest to low quality, and it is especially challenging to identify uncommon adverse effects. Consequently, expert opinion guides most practice recommendations.

Options to test the function of the ureters at cystoscopy
Given the lack of availability of indigo carmine, I recommend one of the following three options to test the function of the ureters at cystoscopy.

Partially fill the bladder with a solution of either sterile water or a 10% dextrose solution. (Experienced surgeons may prefer to use saline.) The turbulence of the interaction between the ureteral urine jet and instilled fluid in the bladder may permit visualization of the urine stream exiting the ureteral orifices as it swirls through the sterile water or dextrose solution. Both sterile water and a 10% dextrose solution offer a contrast in viscosity between the urine and the cystoscopy fluid, which may enhance the ability to detect the urine jet leaving the ureter.²

Administer IV methylene blue. Methylene blue is FDA approved for methemoglobinemia treatment. For this indication, it is administered intravenously at a dose of 1 to 2 mg/kgover 5 to 10 minutes. Paradoxically, when administered at a dose of >7 mg/kg, methylene blue can cause methemoglobinemia.³

Methylene blue often is provided as a 1% solution of 10 mg/mL in 10-mL vials. To use intravenous (IV) methylene blue to test ureteral function at cystoscopy, administer IV methylene blue 50 mg over 5 minutes. Use the cystoscope to view the colored urine exiting the ureteral orifices.^4,5 Administering a small dose of IV furosemide may accelerate the appearance of methylene blue in the urine.

When to use caution. Methylene blue blocks serotonin metabolism by inhibiting monoamine oxidase and may precipitate a serotonin syndrome in patients taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), or monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs).

Common findings in the serotonin syndrome include: temperature above 38° C (100.4° F), anxiety, agitation, delirium, clonus, tremor, and hypertonia.⁶ I recommend that you DO NOT use IV methylene blue in patients taking these medications.^7,8

Great caution should be used before administering IV methylene blue in the presence of the following clinical situations:

• renal impairment  
• G6PD deficiency
• pediatric patients.

Methylene blue never should be given by a subcutaneous or intrathecal route. In pregnant women it should never be injected into the amniotic fluid compartment.

Use preoperative oral phenazo-pyridine. If the preoperative plan includes a cystoscopy procedure to test ureteral function, administering oral phenazopyridine in the preoperative holding area will result in colorization of the urine within 30 minutes, and it will persist for approximately 4 to 5 hours. To use this approach, administer one dose of phenazopyridine (Pyridium, Azo-Gesic), 100 mg or 200 mg orally, 30 minutes to 1 hour before the planned surgical start time, in the preoperative holding area.⁹ During cystoscopy, the urine from the ureteral jet will be colored orange.

When to use caution. Phenazo­pyridine should not be administered to patients with G6PD deficiency.

Option to test for bladder injury
Methylene blue. If methylene blue is used to test the integrity of the bladder, I recommend diluting 10 mg methylene blue in 1 L normal saline and then instilling the dilute solution through a catheter into the bladder.¹⁰

It is unlikely that this technique will be associated with sufficient methylene blue absorption to cause a serotonin syndrome. Therefore, this technique can be used in patients taking SSRIs, SNRIs, and MAOIs.

Option to test patency of the fallopian tubes (chromopertubation)
Methylene blue. If methylene blue is used via a cannula in the uterine cavity to test the patency of the fallopian tubes, I recommend diluting 10 mg methylene blue in 150 mL normal saline and using the dilute solution to test tubal patency.

It is unlikely that this process will lead to sufficient methylene blue absorption to cause a serotonin syndrome. Therefore, this technique can be used in patients taking SSRIs, SNRIs and MAOIs. However, if intrauterine injection of the dilute dye solution results in extravasation of the dye into the pelvic veins, a significant amount of dye can enter the circulation.¹¹ There are case reports of anaphylaxis following intrauterine injection of methylene blue to test tubal patency.^12,13

Options to diagnose PROM and to use for twin amniocentesis
None. Most experts recommend against the intra-amniotic injection of methylene blue to diagnose PROM or in twin amniocentesis procedures. Methylene blue injected into the intra-amniotic fluid during amniocentesis in multiple gestations has been reported to cause fetal bowel obstruction or atresia.^14,15 Fetal death also has been reported.¹⁶ Decades ago, indocyanine green, which is FDA approved to determine cardiac output, liver blood flow, and hepatic function, was reported to be useful to mark one sac of a twin gestation during amniocentesis.¹⁷ With modern ultrasonography technology, the need to rely on a dye to mark a sac of a twin has decreased significantly.

Our only option is to cope—effectively as possible Over decades, the medical community develops patterns of patient care that are critically dependent on the availability of key pharmaceuticals and devices. When a pharmaceutical or device suddenly becomes unavailable, it can disrupt important patterns of patient care. Imagine the impact on obstetrics practice if oxytocin became unavailable due to manufacturing shortages. Likely, both market forces and government regulation are the root cause of the shortfalls. Preventing the adverse consequences of the sudden loss of key pharmaceuticals and devices is an important priority to ensure optimal care of our patients.

Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Although there are some glimmers of hope that U.S. birthweights may be declining, the average infant birthweight has remained significantly tilted toward obesity. Moreover, and alarming number of infants, children, and adolescents are obese.

In 2007-2008, 9.5% of infants and toddlers were at or above the 95th percentile of the weight-for-recumbent-length growth charts. Among children and adolescents aged 2-19 years, 11.9% were at or above the 97th percentile of the body-mass-index-for-age growth charts; 16.9% were at or above the 95th percentile; and 31.7% were at or above the 85th percentile of BMI for age (JAMA 2010;303:242-9).

While more recent reports of obesity in children indicate a modest decline in obesity among 2- to 5-year-olds (JAMA 2014;311:806-14), an alarming number of infants and children have excess adiposity (roughly twice what is expected). In addition, cardiovascular mortality later in life continues to rise.

The question arises, have childhood and adult obesity rates remained high because mothers are feeding their children the wrong foods or because these children were born obese? One also wonders, with respect to cardiovascular mortality in adulthood, is the in utero environment playing a role?

Old lessons, growing relevance

More than 3 decades ago, the late British physician Dr. David Barker got us thinking about how a challenging life in the womb can set us up for downstream ill health. He studied births from 1910 to 1945 and found that the cardiovascular mortality of individuals born during that time was inversely related to birthweight. Smaller babies, he found, could have cardiovascular mortality risks that were double or even quadruple the risks of larger babies.

Dr. Barker theorized that, when faced with undernutrition, the fetus adapts by sending more blood to the brain and sacrificing blood flow to less essential tissues. His theory about how growth and nutrition before birth may affect the heart became known as the "Barker Hypothesis." It was initially controversial, but it led to an explosion of research – especially since 2000 – on various downstream effects of the intrauterine environment.

Investigators have learned that it is not only cardiovascular mortality that is affected by low birthweight, but also the risk of developing diabetes and being overweight. This is because the fetus makes less essential systems insulin resistant. Insulin resistance persists in the womb and after birth as well, predisposing individuals to insulin resistance and obesity, both of which are closely linked to the risk of metabolic syndrome – a group of risk factors that raises the likelihood of developing heart disease, stroke, and diabetes.

In fact, further research on cohorts of Barker children – individuals who had low birthweights – has shown that not only have they had higher rates of cardiovascular disease, but they have had higher blood sugars and higher rates of insulin resistance as well.

Today, we appreciate a fuller picture of the Barker data, one that shows a reversal of this trend when birthweights reach 4,000-4,500 grams. At this point, what was a progressively downward slope of cardiovascular mortality rates with increasing birthweight suddenly shoots upward again when birthweight exceeds 4,000 g.

It is this end of the curve that is most relevant – and most concerning – for ob.gyns. today. Our problem in the United States is not so much one of starving or growth-restricted newborns, as these babies account for 5% or less of all births. It is one of overweight and obese newborns who now represent as many as 1 in 7 births. Just like the Barker babies who were growth restricted, these newborns have high insulin levels and increased risk of cardiovascular disease as adults.

Changing the trajectory

Both maternal obesity and gestational diabetes get at the heart of the Barker Hypothesis, albeit a twist, in that excessive maternal adiposity and associated insulin resistance results in high maternal blood glucose, transferring excessive nutrients to the fetus. This causes accumulation of fat in the fetus and programs the fetus for an increased and persistent risk of adiposity after birth, early-onset metabolic syndrome, and downstream cardiovascular disease in adulthood.

Dr. Dana Dabelea’s sibling study of almost 15 years ago demonstrated the long-term impact of the adverse intrauterine environment associated with maternal diabetes. Matched siblings who were born after their mothers had developed diabetes had almost double the rate of obesity as adolescents, compared with the siblings born before their mothers were diagnosed with diabetes. In childhood, these siblings ate at the same table and came from the same gene pools (with the same fathers), but they experienced dramatically different health outcomes (Diabetes 2000:49:2208-11).

This landmark study has been reproduced by other investigators who have compared children of mothers who had gestational diabetes and/or were overweight, with children whose mothers did not have gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or were of normal weight. Such studies have consistently shown that, faced with either or both maternal obesity and diabetes in utero, offspring were significantly more likely to become overweight children and adults with insulin resistance and other components of the metabolic syndrome.

Importantly, we have evidence from randomized trials that interventions to treat GDM can effectively reduce rates of newborn obesity. While differences in birthweight between treatment and no-treatment arms have been modest, reductions in neonatal body fat, as measured by skin-fold thickness, the ponderal index, and birthweight percentile, have been highly significant.

The offspring of mothers who were treated in these trials, the Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:2477-86), and a study by Dr. Mark B. Landon and his colleagues (N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:1339-48), had approximately half of the newborn adiposity than did offspring of mothers who were not treated. In the latter study, maternal dietary measures alone were successful in reducing neonatal adiposity in over 80% of infants.

While published follow-up data of the offspring in these cohorts have covered only 5-8 years (showing persistently less adiposity in the treated groups), the offspring in the Australian cohort are still being monitored. Based on the cohort and case-control studies summarized above, it seems fair to expect that the children of mothers who were treated for GDM will have significantly better health profiles into and through adulthood.

We know from the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study that what were formerly considered mild and inconsequential maternal blood glucose levels are instead potentially quite harmful. The study showed a clear linear relationship between maternal fasting blood glucose levels, fetal cord blood insulin concentrations (a reflection of fetal glucose levels), and newborn body fat percentage (N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358:1991-2002).

Interestingly, Dr. Patrick Catalano’s analysis of data from the HAPO study (Diabetes Care 2012;35:780-6) shows us more: Maternal obesity is almost as strong a driver of newborn obesity as is GDM. Compared with GDM (which increased the percentage of infant birthweights to greater than the 90th percentile by a factor of 2.19), maternal obesity alone increased the frequency of LGA by a factor of 1.73, and maternal obesity and GDM together increased LGA newborns by 3.62-fold.

In light of these recent findings, it is critical that we not only treat our patients who have GDM, but that we attempt to interrupt the chain of obesity that passes from mother to fetus, and from obese newborns onto their subsequent offspring.

A growing proportion of women across all race and ethnicity groups gain more than 40 pounds during pregnancy for singleton births, and many of them do not lose the weight between pregnancies. Increasingly, we have patients whose first child may not have been exposed to obesity in utero, but whose second child is exposed to overweight or obesity and higher levels of insulin resistance and glycemia.

The Institute of Medicine documented these issues in its 2009 report, "Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines." Data on maternal postpartum weights are not widely available, but data that have been collected suggest that gaining above recommended ranges is associated with excess maternal weight retention post partum, regardless of prepregnancy BMI. Women who gained above the range recommended by the IOM in 1990 had postpartum weight retention of 15-20 pounds. Among women who gained excessive amounts of weight, moreover, more than 40% retained more than 20 pounds, according to the report.

We must break the intergenerational transfer of obesity and insulin resistance by liberally treating GDM and optimizing glucose control during pregnancy. More importantly, we must emphasize to women the importance of having healthy weights at the time of conception. Recent research affirms that moderately simple interventions, such as dietary improvements and exercise can go a long way to achieving these goals. If we don’t – in keeping with the knowledge spurred on by Dr. Barker – we will be programming more newborns for life with insulin resistance, obesity, and disease.

Dr. Moore is a perinatologist who is chair of the department of reproductive medicine at the University of California, San Diego. He said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

Although there are some glimmers of hope that U.S. birthweights may be declining, the average infant birthweight has remained significantly tilted toward obesity. Moreover, and alarming number of infants, children, and adolescents are obese.

In 2007-2008, 9.5% of infants and toddlers were at or above the 95th percentile of the weight-for-recumbent-length growth charts. Among children and adolescents aged 2-19 years, 11.9% were at or above the 97th percentile of the body-mass-index-for-age growth charts; 16.9% were at or above the 95th percentile; and 31.7% were at or above the 85th percentile of BMI for age (JAMA 2010;303:242-9).

While more recent reports of obesity in children indicate a modest decline in obesity among 2- to 5-year-olds (JAMA 2014;311:806-14), an alarming number of infants and children have excess adiposity (roughly twice what is expected). In addition, cardiovascular mortality later in life continues to rise.

The question arises, have childhood and adult obesity rates remained high because mothers are feeding their children the wrong foods or because these children were born obese? One also wonders, with respect to cardiovascular mortality in adulthood, is the in utero environment playing a role?

Old lessons, growing relevance

More than 3 decades ago, the late British physician Dr. David Barker got us thinking about how a challenging life in the womb can set us up for downstream ill health. He studied births from 1910 to 1945 and found that the cardiovascular mortality of individuals born during that time was inversely related to birthweight. Smaller babies, he found, could have cardiovascular mortality risks that were double or even quadruple the risks of larger babies.

Dr. Barker theorized that, when faced with undernutrition, the fetus adapts by sending more blood to the brain and sacrificing blood flow to less essential tissues. His theory about how growth and nutrition before birth may affect the heart became known as the "Barker Hypothesis." It was initially controversial, but it led to an explosion of research – especially since 2000 – on various downstream effects of the intrauterine environment.

Investigators have learned that it is not only cardiovascular mortality that is affected by low birthweight, but also the risk of developing diabetes and being overweight. This is because the fetus makes less essential systems insulin resistant. Insulin resistance persists in the womb and after birth as well, predisposing individuals to insulin resistance and obesity, both of which are closely linked to the risk of metabolic syndrome – a group of risk factors that raises the likelihood of developing heart disease, stroke, and diabetes.

In fact, further research on cohorts of Barker children – individuals who had low birthweights – has shown that not only have they had higher rates of cardiovascular disease, but they have had higher blood sugars and higher rates of insulin resistance as well.

Today, we appreciate a fuller picture of the Barker data, one that shows a reversal of this trend when birthweights reach 4,000-4,500 grams. At this point, what was a progressively downward slope of cardiovascular mortality rates with increasing birthweight suddenly shoots upward again when birthweight exceeds 4,000 g.

It is this end of the curve that is most relevant – and most concerning – for ob.gyns. today. Our problem in the United States is not so much one of starving or growth-restricted newborns, as these babies account for 5% or less of all births. It is one of overweight and obese newborns who now represent as many as 1 in 7 births. Just like the Barker babies who were growth restricted, these newborns have high insulin levels and increased risk of cardiovascular disease as adults.

Changing the trajectory

Both maternal obesity and gestational diabetes get at the heart of the Barker Hypothesis, albeit a twist, in that excessive maternal adiposity and associated insulin resistance results in high maternal blood glucose, transferring excessive nutrients to the fetus. This causes accumulation of fat in the fetus and programs the fetus for an increased and persistent risk of adiposity after birth, early-onset metabolic syndrome, and downstream cardiovascular disease in adulthood.

Dr. Dana Dabelea’s sibling study of almost 15 years ago demonstrated the long-term impact of the adverse intrauterine environment associated with maternal diabetes. Matched siblings who were born after their mothers had developed diabetes had almost double the rate of obesity as adolescents, compared with the siblings born before their mothers were diagnosed with diabetes. In childhood, these siblings ate at the same table and came from the same gene pools (with the same fathers), but they experienced dramatically different health outcomes (Diabetes 2000:49:2208-11).

This landmark study has been reproduced by other investigators who have compared children of mothers who had gestational diabetes and/or were overweight, with children whose mothers did not have gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or were of normal weight. Such studies have consistently shown that, faced with either or both maternal obesity and diabetes in utero, offspring were significantly more likely to become overweight children and adults with insulin resistance and other components of the metabolic syndrome.

Importantly, we have evidence from randomized trials that interventions to treat GDM can effectively reduce rates of newborn obesity. While differences in birthweight between treatment and no-treatment arms have been modest, reductions in neonatal body fat, as measured by skin-fold thickness, the ponderal index, and birthweight percentile, have been highly significant.

The offspring of mothers who were treated in these trials, the Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:2477-86), and a study by Dr. Mark B. Landon and his colleagues (N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:1339-48), had approximately half of the newborn adiposity than did offspring of mothers who were not treated. In the latter study, maternal dietary measures alone were successful in reducing neonatal adiposity in over 80% of infants.

While published follow-up data of the offspring in these cohorts have covered only 5-8 years (showing persistently less adiposity in the treated groups), the offspring in the Australian cohort are still being monitored. Based on the cohort and case-control studies summarized above, it seems fair to expect that the children of mothers who were treated for GDM will have significantly better health profiles into and through adulthood.

We know from the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study that what were formerly considered mild and inconsequential maternal blood glucose levels are instead potentially quite harmful. The study showed a clear linear relationship between maternal fasting blood glucose levels, fetal cord blood insulin concentrations (a reflection of fetal glucose levels), and newborn body fat percentage (N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358:1991-2002).

Interestingly, Dr. Patrick Catalano’s analysis of data from the HAPO study (Diabetes Care 2012;35:780-6) shows us more: Maternal obesity is almost as strong a driver of newborn obesity as is GDM. Compared with GDM (which increased the percentage of infant birthweights to greater than the 90th percentile by a factor of 2.19), maternal obesity alone increased the frequency of LGA by a factor of 1.73, and maternal obesity and GDM together increased LGA newborns by 3.62-fold.

In light of these recent findings, it is critical that we not only treat our patients who have GDM, but that we attempt to interrupt the chain of obesity that passes from mother to fetus, and from obese newborns onto their subsequent offspring.

A growing proportion of women across all race and ethnicity groups gain more than 40 pounds during pregnancy for singleton births, and many of them do not lose the weight between pregnancies. Increasingly, we have patients whose first child may not have been exposed to obesity in utero, but whose second child is exposed to overweight or obesity and higher levels of insulin resistance and glycemia.

The Institute of Medicine documented these issues in its 2009 report, "Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines." Data on maternal postpartum weights are not widely available, but data that have been collected suggest that gaining above recommended ranges is associated with excess maternal weight retention post partum, regardless of prepregnancy BMI. Women who gained above the range recommended by the IOM in 1990 had postpartum weight retention of 15-20 pounds. Among women who gained excessive amounts of weight, moreover, more than 40% retained more than 20 pounds, according to the report.

We must break the intergenerational transfer of obesity and insulin resistance by liberally treating GDM and optimizing glucose control during pregnancy. More importantly, we must emphasize to women the importance of having healthy weights at the time of conception. Recent research affirms that moderately simple interventions, such as dietary improvements and exercise can go a long way to achieving these goals. If we don’t – in keeping with the knowledge spurred on by Dr. Barker – we will be programming more newborns for life with insulin resistance, obesity, and disease.

Dr. Moore is a perinatologist who is chair of the department of reproductive medicine at the University of California, San Diego. He said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

Although there are some glimmers of hope that U.S. birthweights may be declining, the average infant birthweight has remained significantly tilted toward obesity. Moreover, and alarming number of infants, children, and adolescents are obese.

In 2007-2008, 9.5% of infants and toddlers were at or above the 95th percentile of the weight-for-recumbent-length growth charts. Among children and adolescents aged 2-19 years, 11.9% were at or above the 97th percentile of the body-mass-index-for-age growth charts; 16.9% were at or above the 95th percentile; and 31.7% were at or above the 85th percentile of BMI for age (JAMA 2010;303:242-9).

While more recent reports of obesity in children indicate a modest decline in obesity among 2- to 5-year-olds (JAMA 2014;311:806-14), an alarming number of infants and children have excess adiposity (roughly twice what is expected). In addition, cardiovascular mortality later in life continues to rise.

The question arises, have childhood and adult obesity rates remained high because mothers are feeding their children the wrong foods or because these children were born obese? One also wonders, with respect to cardiovascular mortality in adulthood, is the in utero environment playing a role?

Old lessons, growing relevance

More than 3 decades ago, the late British physician Dr. David Barker got us thinking about how a challenging life in the womb can set us up for downstream ill health. He studied births from 1910 to 1945 and found that the cardiovascular mortality of individuals born during that time was inversely related to birthweight. Smaller babies, he found, could have cardiovascular mortality risks that were double or even quadruple the risks of larger babies.

Dr. Barker theorized that, when faced with undernutrition, the fetus adapts by sending more blood to the brain and sacrificing blood flow to less essential tissues. His theory about how growth and nutrition before birth may affect the heart became known as the "Barker Hypothesis." It was initially controversial, but it led to an explosion of research – especially since 2000 – on various downstream effects of the intrauterine environment.

Investigators have learned that it is not only cardiovascular mortality that is affected by low birthweight, but also the risk of developing diabetes and being overweight. This is because the fetus makes less essential systems insulin resistant. Insulin resistance persists in the womb and after birth as well, predisposing individuals to insulin resistance and obesity, both of which are closely linked to the risk of metabolic syndrome – a group of risk factors that raises the likelihood of developing heart disease, stroke, and diabetes.

In fact, further research on cohorts of Barker children – individuals who had low birthweights – has shown that not only have they had higher rates of cardiovascular disease, but they have had higher blood sugars and higher rates of insulin resistance as well.

Today, we appreciate a fuller picture of the Barker data, one that shows a reversal of this trend when birthweights reach 4,000-4,500 grams. At this point, what was a progressively downward slope of cardiovascular mortality rates with increasing birthweight suddenly shoots upward again when birthweight exceeds 4,000 g.

It is this end of the curve that is most relevant – and most concerning – for ob.gyns. today. Our problem in the United States is not so much one of starving or growth-restricted newborns, as these babies account for 5% or less of all births. It is one of overweight and obese newborns who now represent as many as 1 in 7 births. Just like the Barker babies who were growth restricted, these newborns have high insulin levels and increased risk of cardiovascular disease as adults.

Changing the trajectory

Both maternal obesity and gestational diabetes get at the heart of the Barker Hypothesis, albeit a twist, in that excessive maternal adiposity and associated insulin resistance results in high maternal blood glucose, transferring excessive nutrients to the fetus. This causes accumulation of fat in the fetus and programs the fetus for an increased and persistent risk of adiposity after birth, early-onset metabolic syndrome, and downstream cardiovascular disease in adulthood.

Dr. Dana Dabelea’s sibling study of almost 15 years ago demonstrated the long-term impact of the adverse intrauterine environment associated with maternal diabetes. Matched siblings who were born after their mothers had developed diabetes had almost double the rate of obesity as adolescents, compared with the siblings born before their mothers were diagnosed with diabetes. In childhood, these siblings ate at the same table and came from the same gene pools (with the same fathers), but they experienced dramatically different health outcomes (Diabetes 2000:49:2208-11).

This landmark study has been reproduced by other investigators who have compared children of mothers who had gestational diabetes and/or were overweight, with children whose mothers did not have gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or were of normal weight. Such studies have consistently shown that, faced with either or both maternal obesity and diabetes in utero, offspring were significantly more likely to become overweight children and adults with insulin resistance and other components of the metabolic syndrome.

Importantly, we have evidence from randomized trials that interventions to treat GDM can effectively reduce rates of newborn obesity. While differences in birthweight between treatment and no-treatment arms have been modest, reductions in neonatal body fat, as measured by skin-fold thickness, the ponderal index, and birthweight percentile, have been highly significant.

The offspring of mothers who were treated in these trials, the Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:2477-86), and a study by Dr. Mark B. Landon and his colleagues (N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:1339-48), had approximately half of the newborn adiposity than did offspring of mothers who were not treated. In the latter study, maternal dietary measures alone were successful in reducing neonatal adiposity in over 80% of infants.

While published follow-up data of the offspring in these cohorts have covered only 5-8 years (showing persistently less adiposity in the treated groups), the offspring in the Australian cohort are still being monitored. Based on the cohort and case-control studies summarized above, it seems fair to expect that the children of mothers who were treated for GDM will have significantly better health profiles into and through adulthood.

We know from the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study that what were formerly considered mild and inconsequential maternal blood glucose levels are instead potentially quite harmful. The study showed a clear linear relationship between maternal fasting blood glucose levels, fetal cord blood insulin concentrations (a reflection of fetal glucose levels), and newborn body fat percentage (N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358:1991-2002).

Interestingly, Dr. Patrick Catalano’s analysis of data from the HAPO study (Diabetes Care 2012;35:780-6) shows us more: Maternal obesity is almost as strong a driver of newborn obesity as is GDM. Compared with GDM (which increased the percentage of infant birthweights to greater than the 90th percentile by a factor of 2.19), maternal obesity alone increased the frequency of LGA by a factor of 1.73, and maternal obesity and GDM together increased LGA newborns by 3.62-fold.

In light of these recent findings, it is critical that we not only treat our patients who have GDM, but that we attempt to interrupt the chain of obesity that passes from mother to fetus, and from obese newborns onto their subsequent offspring.

A growing proportion of women across all race and ethnicity groups gain more than 40 pounds during pregnancy for singleton births, and many of them do not lose the weight between pregnancies. Increasingly, we have patients whose first child may not have been exposed to obesity in utero, but whose second child is exposed to overweight or obesity and higher levels of insulin resistance and glycemia.

The Institute of Medicine documented these issues in its 2009 report, "Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines." Data on maternal postpartum weights are not widely available, but data that have been collected suggest that gaining above recommended ranges is associated with excess maternal weight retention post partum, regardless of prepregnancy BMI. Women who gained above the range recommended by the IOM in 1990 had postpartum weight retention of 15-20 pounds. Among women who gained excessive amounts of weight, moreover, more than 40% retained more than 20 pounds, according to the report.

We must break the intergenerational transfer of obesity and insulin resistance by liberally treating GDM and optimizing glucose control during pregnancy. More importantly, we must emphasize to women the importance of having healthy weights at the time of conception. Recent research affirms that moderately simple interventions, such as dietary improvements and exercise can go a long way to achieving these goals. If we don’t – in keeping with the knowledge spurred on by Dr. Barker – we will be programming more newborns for life with insulin resistance, obesity, and disease.

Dr. Moore is a perinatologist who is chair of the department of reproductive medicine at the University of California, San Diego. He said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

On Aug. 27, 2013, the field of obstetrics and gynecology suffered a great loss: the passing of Dr. David J.P. Barker. Dr. Barker was a visionary and leader whose hypothesis about the links between a mother’s health and the long-term health of her children was controversial when he first posed it in the late 1980s. However, after subsequent decades of maternal-fetal practice and research, his idea that preventing chronic disease starts with a healthy mother and baby, is embraced by the medical and science communities today.

I was just starting my career when Dr. Barker’s hypothesis, known then as the "fetal origins hypothesis" but subsequently referred to as the "Barker Hypothesis," was published. During my fellowship in maternal-fetal medicine at Yale University, I had the privilege of attending one of Dr. Barker’s lectures and meeting him. While my colleagues and I thought him an eloquent and impassioned speaker, Dr. Barker’s theory – that there was a relationship between a person’s birth weight and his or her lifetime risk for chronic disease – was highly contentious. He had based his hypothesis on large epidemiological studies conducted in Finland, India, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States – all of which revealed that the lower a person’s birth weight, the higher his or her risk for developing coronary heart disease. In addition, he concluded that the lower a person’s birth weight, but the faster the weight gain after age 2 years, the higher a person’s risk for hypertension, stroke, and type 2 diabetes.

At that time, we did not fully realize the significance, gravity, and enormity of Dr. Barker’s contribution to the ob.gyn. field. I could not imagine the impact that his work would have on my professional path. Dr. Barker’s early papers often concluded with a section looking to the future, and in one of them he stated that "we now need to progress beyond epidemiologic associations [between in utero conditions and health later in life] to greater understanding of the cellular and molecular processes that underlie them"(Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000;71:1344s-52s). From my work as a physician with diabetic pregnant women to my scientific research devoted to understanding how, at the molecular level, maternal diabetes affects the developing fetus, I have a great appreciation and respect for Dr. Barker’s work.

Therefore, I am very pleased that this month’s Master Class is devoted to a discussion of how the Barker Hypothesis applies today. We have invited Dr. Thomas R. Moore, a perinatologist who is chair of the department of reproductive medicine at the University of California, San Diego, to give his reflection on how Dr. Barker’s once radical ideas revolutionized our field.

Dr. Reece, who specializes in maternal-fetal medicine, is vice president for medical affairs at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, as well as the John Z. and Akiko K. Bowers Distinguished Professor and dean of the school of medicine. Dr. Reece said he had no relevant financial disclosures. He is the medical editor of the Master Class column. Contact him at [email protected].

On Aug. 27, 2013, the field of obstetrics and gynecology suffered a great loss: the passing of Dr. David J.P. Barker. Dr. Barker was a visionary and leader whose hypothesis about the links between a mother’s health and the long-term health of her children was controversial when he first posed it in the late 1980s. However, after subsequent decades of maternal-fetal practice and research, his idea that preventing chronic disease starts with a healthy mother and baby, is embraced by the medical and science communities today.

I was just starting my career when Dr. Barker’s hypothesis, known then as the "fetal origins hypothesis" but subsequently referred to as the "Barker Hypothesis," was published. During my fellowship in maternal-fetal medicine at Yale University, I had the privilege of attending one of Dr. Barker’s lectures and meeting him. While my colleagues and I thought him an eloquent and impassioned speaker, Dr. Barker’s theory – that there was a relationship between a person’s birth weight and his or her lifetime risk for chronic disease – was highly contentious. He had based his hypothesis on large epidemiological studies conducted in Finland, India, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States – all of which revealed that the lower a person’s birth weight, the higher his or her risk for developing coronary heart disease. In addition, he concluded that the lower a person’s birth weight, but the faster the weight gain after age 2 years, the higher a person’s risk for hypertension, stroke, and type 2 diabetes.

At that time, we did not fully realize the significance, gravity, and enormity of Dr. Barker’s contribution to the ob.gyn. field. I could not imagine the impact that his work would have on my professional path. Dr. Barker’s early papers often concluded with a section looking to the future, and in one of them he stated that "we now need to progress beyond epidemiologic associations [between in utero conditions and health later in life] to greater understanding of the cellular and molecular processes that underlie them"(Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000;71:1344s-52s). From my work as a physician with diabetic pregnant women to my scientific research devoted to understanding how, at the molecular level, maternal diabetes affects the developing fetus, I have a great appreciation and respect for Dr. Barker’s work.

Therefore, I am very pleased that this month’s Master Class is devoted to a discussion of how the Barker Hypothesis applies today. We have invited Dr. Thomas R. Moore, a perinatologist who is chair of the department of reproductive medicine at the University of California, San Diego, to give his reflection on how Dr. Barker’s once radical ideas revolutionized our field.

Dr. Reece, who specializes in maternal-fetal medicine, is vice president for medical affairs at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, as well as the John Z. and Akiko K. Bowers Distinguished Professor and dean of the school of medicine. Dr. Reece said he had no relevant financial disclosures. He is the medical editor of the Master Class column. Contact him at [email protected].

On Aug. 27, 2013, the field of obstetrics and gynecology suffered a great loss: the passing of Dr. David J.P. Barker. Dr. Barker was a visionary and leader whose hypothesis about the links between a mother’s health and the long-term health of her children was controversial when he first posed it in the late 1980s. However, after subsequent decades of maternal-fetal practice and research, his idea that preventing chronic disease starts with a healthy mother and baby, is embraced by the medical and science communities today.

I was just starting my career when Dr. Barker’s hypothesis, known then as the "fetal origins hypothesis" but subsequently referred to as the "Barker Hypothesis," was published. During my fellowship in maternal-fetal medicine at Yale University, I had the privilege of attending one of Dr. Barker’s lectures and meeting him. While my colleagues and I thought him an eloquent and impassioned speaker, Dr. Barker’s theory – that there was a relationship between a person’s birth weight and his or her lifetime risk for chronic disease – was highly contentious. He had based his hypothesis on large epidemiological studies conducted in Finland, India, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States – all of which revealed that the lower a person’s birth weight, the higher his or her risk for developing coronary heart disease. In addition, he concluded that the lower a person’s birth weight, but the faster the weight gain after age 2 years, the higher a person’s risk for hypertension, stroke, and type 2 diabetes.

At that time, we did not fully realize the significance, gravity, and enormity of Dr. Barker’s contribution to the ob.gyn. field. I could not imagine the impact that his work would have on my professional path. Dr. Barker’s early papers often concluded with a section looking to the future, and in one of them he stated that "we now need to progress beyond epidemiologic associations [between in utero conditions and health later in life] to greater understanding of the cellular and molecular processes that underlie them"(Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000;71:1344s-52s). From my work as a physician with diabetic pregnant women to my scientific research devoted to understanding how, at the molecular level, maternal diabetes affects the developing fetus, I have a great appreciation and respect for Dr. Barker’s work.

Therefore, I am very pleased that this month’s Master Class is devoted to a discussion of how the Barker Hypothesis applies today. We have invited Dr. Thomas R. Moore, a perinatologist who is chair of the department of reproductive medicine at the University of California, San Diego, to give his reflection on how Dr. Barker’s once radical ideas revolutionized our field.

Dr. Reece, who specializes in maternal-fetal medicine, is vice president for medical affairs at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, as well as the John Z. and Akiko K. Bowers Distinguished Professor and dean of the school of medicine. Dr. Reece said he had no relevant financial disclosures. He is the medical editor of the Master Class column. Contact him at [email protected].