Americans are getting more sleep

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 04/23/2019 - 12:37

 

Some Americans began getting more sleep over the period of 2003 through 2016, an analysis of data from the American Time Use Survey (ATUS) has suggested.

Many people living in the United States habitually sleep less than the recommended 7-9 hours each day. “Experimental studies have demonstrated that both acute total and chronic partial sleep restriction in healthy adults are associated with physiological changes that can be considered precursors of manifest diseases (e.g. decreased insulin sensitivity),” noted Mathias Basner, MD, PhD, and David F. Dinges, PhD, both of the division of sleep and chronobiology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, in their paper, which was published in the journal Sleep.

velusariot/Thinkstock

This new study is the first to have demonstrated that large parts of the U.S. population significantly increased their sleep between 2003 and 2016.

The investigators analyzed ATUS responses from 181,335 Americans aged 15 years and older; respondents included in the analysis were not active in the military or residing in institutions such as nursing homes or prisons. In 15- to 20-minute computer-assisted telephone interviews, the survey participants reported the activities they performed over a 24-hour period on a minute-by-minute basis. In-depth analyses only included groups “that showed a significant increase in sleep duration across survey years either on weekdays or weekends (or both): employed respondents, full-time students, and retirees.”

Using this data from ATUS, Dr. Basner and Dr. Dinges found that on workdays the prevalence of people who were sleeping 7 hours or less a day decreased by 0.44% per year (P less than .0001), while the percentage people who were sleeping more than 9 hours a day increased by 0.48% per year (P less than .0001).

Overall, respondents’ sleep increased by an average of 1.40 minutes during a weekday and 0.83 minutes during a weekend day every year.

These findings will be welcome news for organizations, such as the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, the Sleep Research Society, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, that have been campaigning for years to increase sleep time among Americans.

 

 


The researchers also observed that the percentage of respondents in short sleep duration categories decreased significantly, and the percentage of respondents in long sleep duration categories increased significantly across survey years. One of the “most pronounced changes” occurred in the size of the group of patients receiving 6-7 hours of sleep. This group decreased by 0.23% per year. The biggest change was seen in the category of patients receiving 9-10 hours of sleep, which increased by 0.24% per year.

“[The] change in sleep duration across survey years on weekdays can mostly be explained by respondents going to bed earlier at night and, to a lesser degree, by getting up later in the morning,” the researchers said. “On weekends/holidays, ‘time to bed’ shifted significantly to earlier bed times by 1.1 min/year across survey years, which was comparable to the shift observed on weekdays.”

Study participants aged 18-24 slept the most, with hours slept having “decreased with increasing age.” On weekdays, adults aged 45-54 years slept the least, and on weekends, adults aged 55-64 years got the least shuteye. Hispanic, Asian, and black respondents slept more than white and “other race/ethnicity” survey participants. The researchers also found that women overall got more sleep than men.

Dr. Basner and Dr. Dinges expressed optimism about Americans’ ongoing battle against chronic sleep deficiency. “These findings presented here suggest that we are on the right track ... even if there is still a long way to go,” they said.

The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Basner M et al. Sleep. 2018 Apr 1;41[4]:1-16.

Body

David Schulman, MD, FCCP, comments: For more than fifteen years, we have had evidence that sleep deprivation is not only associated with increased accident risk, but also other common causes of mortality, including cardiovascular disease and cancer. Despite this knowledge, decades of trending in sleep patterns of the United States population have continued to show declines in total sleep time, which have been attributed to multiple factors, including longer work hours and the pervasive use of electronics, which can serve both as a distraction from sleep and a contributor to circadian dysrhythmia.  

Dr. David Schulman, FCCP
The recent article by Basner and Dinges suggests, for the first time, that this trend may be reversing. Although the data suggest a minimal bump in sleep time (of approximately 1 minute per night, slightly more during weeknights than weekend nights), it is at least a move in the right direction. In a related editorial in the same issue of SLEEP, Ogilvie and Patel identify some possible problems with the paper; these include a non-validated tool for data collection, and the possible conflation of time in bed and sleep time. Even if the data are accurate, it is difficult to imagine that such a modest improvement in sleep duration would yield meaningful benefits in terms of daytime function and sleep-related morbidity.  

While our work in improving public awareness of sleep deprivation is far from done, perhaps this study is the first sign that a new day is dawning on improved sleep health for the country.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Body

David Schulman, MD, FCCP, comments: For more than fifteen years, we have had evidence that sleep deprivation is not only associated with increased accident risk, but also other common causes of mortality, including cardiovascular disease and cancer. Despite this knowledge, decades of trending in sleep patterns of the United States population have continued to show declines in total sleep time, which have been attributed to multiple factors, including longer work hours and the pervasive use of electronics, which can serve both as a distraction from sleep and a contributor to circadian dysrhythmia.  

Dr. David Schulman, FCCP
The recent article by Basner and Dinges suggests, for the first time, that this trend may be reversing. Although the data suggest a minimal bump in sleep time (of approximately 1 minute per night, slightly more during weeknights than weekend nights), it is at least a move in the right direction. In a related editorial in the same issue of SLEEP, Ogilvie and Patel identify some possible problems with the paper; these include a non-validated tool for data collection, and the possible conflation of time in bed and sleep time. Even if the data are accurate, it is difficult to imagine that such a modest improvement in sleep duration would yield meaningful benefits in terms of daytime function and sleep-related morbidity.  

While our work in improving public awareness of sleep deprivation is far from done, perhaps this study is the first sign that a new day is dawning on improved sleep health for the country.

Body

David Schulman, MD, FCCP, comments: For more than fifteen years, we have had evidence that sleep deprivation is not only associated with increased accident risk, but also other common causes of mortality, including cardiovascular disease and cancer. Despite this knowledge, decades of trending in sleep patterns of the United States population have continued to show declines in total sleep time, which have been attributed to multiple factors, including longer work hours and the pervasive use of electronics, which can serve both as a distraction from sleep and a contributor to circadian dysrhythmia.  

Dr. David Schulman, FCCP
The recent article by Basner and Dinges suggests, for the first time, that this trend may be reversing. Although the data suggest a minimal bump in sleep time (of approximately 1 minute per night, slightly more during weeknights than weekend nights), it is at least a move in the right direction. In a related editorial in the same issue of SLEEP, Ogilvie and Patel identify some possible problems with the paper; these include a non-validated tool for data collection, and the possible conflation of time in bed and sleep time. Even if the data are accurate, it is difficult to imagine that such a modest improvement in sleep duration would yield meaningful benefits in terms of daytime function and sleep-related morbidity.  

While our work in improving public awareness of sleep deprivation is far from done, perhaps this study is the first sign that a new day is dawning on improved sleep health for the country.

 

Some Americans began getting more sleep over the period of 2003 through 2016, an analysis of data from the American Time Use Survey (ATUS) has suggested.

Many people living in the United States habitually sleep less than the recommended 7-9 hours each day. “Experimental studies have demonstrated that both acute total and chronic partial sleep restriction in healthy adults are associated with physiological changes that can be considered precursors of manifest diseases (e.g. decreased insulin sensitivity),” noted Mathias Basner, MD, PhD, and David F. Dinges, PhD, both of the division of sleep and chronobiology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, in their paper, which was published in the journal Sleep.

velusariot/Thinkstock

This new study is the first to have demonstrated that large parts of the U.S. population significantly increased their sleep between 2003 and 2016.

The investigators analyzed ATUS responses from 181,335 Americans aged 15 years and older; respondents included in the analysis were not active in the military or residing in institutions such as nursing homes or prisons. In 15- to 20-minute computer-assisted telephone interviews, the survey participants reported the activities they performed over a 24-hour period on a minute-by-minute basis. In-depth analyses only included groups “that showed a significant increase in sleep duration across survey years either on weekdays or weekends (or both): employed respondents, full-time students, and retirees.”

Using this data from ATUS, Dr. Basner and Dr. Dinges found that on workdays the prevalence of people who were sleeping 7 hours or less a day decreased by 0.44% per year (P less than .0001), while the percentage people who were sleeping more than 9 hours a day increased by 0.48% per year (P less than .0001).

Overall, respondents’ sleep increased by an average of 1.40 minutes during a weekday and 0.83 minutes during a weekend day every year.

These findings will be welcome news for organizations, such as the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, the Sleep Research Society, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, that have been campaigning for years to increase sleep time among Americans.

 

 


The researchers also observed that the percentage of respondents in short sleep duration categories decreased significantly, and the percentage of respondents in long sleep duration categories increased significantly across survey years. One of the “most pronounced changes” occurred in the size of the group of patients receiving 6-7 hours of sleep. This group decreased by 0.23% per year. The biggest change was seen in the category of patients receiving 9-10 hours of sleep, which increased by 0.24% per year.

“[The] change in sleep duration across survey years on weekdays can mostly be explained by respondents going to bed earlier at night and, to a lesser degree, by getting up later in the morning,” the researchers said. “On weekends/holidays, ‘time to bed’ shifted significantly to earlier bed times by 1.1 min/year across survey years, which was comparable to the shift observed on weekdays.”

Study participants aged 18-24 slept the most, with hours slept having “decreased with increasing age.” On weekdays, adults aged 45-54 years slept the least, and on weekends, adults aged 55-64 years got the least shuteye. Hispanic, Asian, and black respondents slept more than white and “other race/ethnicity” survey participants. The researchers also found that women overall got more sleep than men.

Dr. Basner and Dr. Dinges expressed optimism about Americans’ ongoing battle against chronic sleep deficiency. “These findings presented here suggest that we are on the right track ... even if there is still a long way to go,” they said.

The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Basner M et al. Sleep. 2018 Apr 1;41[4]:1-16.

 

Some Americans began getting more sleep over the period of 2003 through 2016, an analysis of data from the American Time Use Survey (ATUS) has suggested.

Many people living in the United States habitually sleep less than the recommended 7-9 hours each day. “Experimental studies have demonstrated that both acute total and chronic partial sleep restriction in healthy adults are associated with physiological changes that can be considered precursors of manifest diseases (e.g. decreased insulin sensitivity),” noted Mathias Basner, MD, PhD, and David F. Dinges, PhD, both of the division of sleep and chronobiology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, in their paper, which was published in the journal Sleep.

velusariot/Thinkstock

This new study is the first to have demonstrated that large parts of the U.S. population significantly increased their sleep between 2003 and 2016.

The investigators analyzed ATUS responses from 181,335 Americans aged 15 years and older; respondents included in the analysis were not active in the military or residing in institutions such as nursing homes or prisons. In 15- to 20-minute computer-assisted telephone interviews, the survey participants reported the activities they performed over a 24-hour period on a minute-by-minute basis. In-depth analyses only included groups “that showed a significant increase in sleep duration across survey years either on weekdays or weekends (or both): employed respondents, full-time students, and retirees.”

Using this data from ATUS, Dr. Basner and Dr. Dinges found that on workdays the prevalence of people who were sleeping 7 hours or less a day decreased by 0.44% per year (P less than .0001), while the percentage people who were sleeping more than 9 hours a day increased by 0.48% per year (P less than .0001).

Overall, respondents’ sleep increased by an average of 1.40 minutes during a weekday and 0.83 minutes during a weekend day every year.

These findings will be welcome news for organizations, such as the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, the Sleep Research Society, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, that have been campaigning for years to increase sleep time among Americans.

 

 


The researchers also observed that the percentage of respondents in short sleep duration categories decreased significantly, and the percentage of respondents in long sleep duration categories increased significantly across survey years. One of the “most pronounced changes” occurred in the size of the group of patients receiving 6-7 hours of sleep. This group decreased by 0.23% per year. The biggest change was seen in the category of patients receiving 9-10 hours of sleep, which increased by 0.24% per year.

“[The] change in sleep duration across survey years on weekdays can mostly be explained by respondents going to bed earlier at night and, to a lesser degree, by getting up later in the morning,” the researchers said. “On weekends/holidays, ‘time to bed’ shifted significantly to earlier bed times by 1.1 min/year across survey years, which was comparable to the shift observed on weekdays.”

Study participants aged 18-24 slept the most, with hours slept having “decreased with increasing age.” On weekdays, adults aged 45-54 years slept the least, and on weekends, adults aged 55-64 years got the least shuteye. Hispanic, Asian, and black respondents slept more than white and “other race/ethnicity” survey participants. The researchers also found that women overall got more sleep than men.

Dr. Basner and Dr. Dinges expressed optimism about Americans’ ongoing battle against chronic sleep deficiency. “These findings presented here suggest that we are on the right track ... even if there is still a long way to go,” they said.

The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Basner M et al. Sleep. 2018 Apr 1;41[4]:1-16.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM SLEEP

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: The amount of time people in the United States spend sleeping has increased.

Major finding: On workdays, the prevalence of people who were sleeping 7 hours or less a day decreased by 0.44% per year, and the percentage of people who were sleeping more than 9 hours a day increased by 0.48% per year.

Study details: An analysis of survey responses from 181,335 Americans over 2003-2016.

Disclosures: The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Source: Basner M et al. Sleep. 2018 Apr 1;41(4):1-16.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Multiple solid tumors targeted by concept CAR T

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 12/11/2020 - 11:20

 

– Call it the CAR of the future – an investigational chimeric antigen receptor–T cell construct targeted against an antigen highly expressed on pediatric solid tumors has shown promising efficacy in preclinical studies.

Investigators found that the antigen, labeled B7-H3, was expressed on 84% of microarrays of pediatric solid tumors. More importantly, a single dose of CAR targeted to B7-H3 caused complete regression of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma xenografts and improved survival over an untransduced, CD19-targeted CAR in mice, Robbie Majzner, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News
Dr. Robbie Majzner
“B7-H3 is a promising target for CAR therapy given that it’s highly and homogeneously expressed on pediatric solid tumors,” said Dr. Majzner, of Stanford University (Calif.).

Dr. Majzner was the recipient of an ASPHO young investigator award for his team’s research into developing a CAR T that could be as effective against solid tumors as other CAR Ts have been against hematologic malignancies such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Solid tumors are more challenging to target than leukemias or lymphomas because of the small number of antigens expressed on most pediatric tumors, he said.

“Over 95% of tumors have a very low rate of mutations, which means that they have very few neoantigens which the immune system can recognize in order to attack,” he said.

In the Children’s Oncology Group ADVL1412 trial, single-agent immunotherapy with the anti–programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor nivolumab (Opdivo) showed no evidence of efficacy against either Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, or measurable neuroblastoma. PD–ligand 1 was found to be expressed in only a few of the 43 tumors studied, suggesting that checkpoint inhibitor therapy is unlikely to work in these solid tumors, he said.

 

 


In contrast, B7-H3 is highly expressed on many different pediatric solid tumors, including rhabdomyosarcoma (95% of tumors stained), Ewing sarcoma (89%), Wilms tumor (100%), neuroblastoma (82%), ganglioneuroblastoma and ganglioneuroma (53%), medulloblastoma (96%), glioblastoma multiforme (84%), and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (100%).

To see whether CAR T therapy might have better efficacy than checkpoint inhibitors in this population, the investigators created a B7-H3 CAR using the B7-H3 tumor–specific monoclonal antibody MGA271, which has been shown to be safe in both adults and children in early clinical trials.

In human tumor xenograft models of osteosarcoma, all mice who received a single dose of the B7-H3 CAR survived at least 70 days after tumor engraftment, whereas all control mice, who received the CD19 CAR, died by day 60 (P = .0067). Similarly, in a model of Ewing sarcoma, all mice treated with B7-H3 survived at least 100 days, whereas all controls were dead by day 50 (P = .0015).

The B7-H3 construct also showed good activity against a model of medulloblastoma, showing that it was capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier.

 

 


Since B7-H3 has been reported to be expressed on both myeloid and lymphoid leukemia cells, the investigators also tested the CAR against a murine model of leukemia generated by injection of K562, a well-characterized line of myeloid leukemia cells.

“While we found some increase in survival in the mice that received the B7-H3 CAR T cells, compared to mice that received untransduced CAR T cells, this clearly is not as effective as in our solid tumor models,” Dr. Majzner said.

Going back to the cell line, they discovered that expression of B7-H3 was considerably lower in the K562 cells than in either the osteosarcoma or medulloblastoma cell lines used in their other models.

They found that both in vitro and in vivo, high levels of B7-H3 expression were necessary to provoke the immune system into releasing cytokines necessary for an adequate antitumor response.

 

 


The investigators are currently planning clinical trials using the B7-H3 CAR T-cell construct in patients with solid tumors.

The work is supported by the Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration, the St. Baldrick’s Foundation, and Stand Up to Cancer. Dr. Majzner reported having no financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Majzner RG et al. ASPHO 2018, Abstract #PS2003.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Call it the CAR of the future – an investigational chimeric antigen receptor–T cell construct targeted against an antigen highly expressed on pediatric solid tumors has shown promising efficacy in preclinical studies.

Investigators found that the antigen, labeled B7-H3, was expressed on 84% of microarrays of pediatric solid tumors. More importantly, a single dose of CAR targeted to B7-H3 caused complete regression of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma xenografts and improved survival over an untransduced, CD19-targeted CAR in mice, Robbie Majzner, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News
Dr. Robbie Majzner
“B7-H3 is a promising target for CAR therapy given that it’s highly and homogeneously expressed on pediatric solid tumors,” said Dr. Majzner, of Stanford University (Calif.).

Dr. Majzner was the recipient of an ASPHO young investigator award for his team’s research into developing a CAR T that could be as effective against solid tumors as other CAR Ts have been against hematologic malignancies such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Solid tumors are more challenging to target than leukemias or lymphomas because of the small number of antigens expressed on most pediatric tumors, he said.

“Over 95% of tumors have a very low rate of mutations, which means that they have very few neoantigens which the immune system can recognize in order to attack,” he said.

In the Children’s Oncology Group ADVL1412 trial, single-agent immunotherapy with the anti–programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor nivolumab (Opdivo) showed no evidence of efficacy against either Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, or measurable neuroblastoma. PD–ligand 1 was found to be expressed in only a few of the 43 tumors studied, suggesting that checkpoint inhibitor therapy is unlikely to work in these solid tumors, he said.

 

 


In contrast, B7-H3 is highly expressed on many different pediatric solid tumors, including rhabdomyosarcoma (95% of tumors stained), Ewing sarcoma (89%), Wilms tumor (100%), neuroblastoma (82%), ganglioneuroblastoma and ganglioneuroma (53%), medulloblastoma (96%), glioblastoma multiforme (84%), and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (100%).

To see whether CAR T therapy might have better efficacy than checkpoint inhibitors in this population, the investigators created a B7-H3 CAR using the B7-H3 tumor–specific monoclonal antibody MGA271, which has been shown to be safe in both adults and children in early clinical trials.

In human tumor xenograft models of osteosarcoma, all mice who received a single dose of the B7-H3 CAR survived at least 70 days after tumor engraftment, whereas all control mice, who received the CD19 CAR, died by day 60 (P = .0067). Similarly, in a model of Ewing sarcoma, all mice treated with B7-H3 survived at least 100 days, whereas all controls were dead by day 50 (P = .0015).

The B7-H3 construct also showed good activity against a model of medulloblastoma, showing that it was capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier.

 

 


Since B7-H3 has been reported to be expressed on both myeloid and lymphoid leukemia cells, the investigators also tested the CAR against a murine model of leukemia generated by injection of K562, a well-characterized line of myeloid leukemia cells.

“While we found some increase in survival in the mice that received the B7-H3 CAR T cells, compared to mice that received untransduced CAR T cells, this clearly is not as effective as in our solid tumor models,” Dr. Majzner said.

Going back to the cell line, they discovered that expression of B7-H3 was considerably lower in the K562 cells than in either the osteosarcoma or medulloblastoma cell lines used in their other models.

They found that both in vitro and in vivo, high levels of B7-H3 expression were necessary to provoke the immune system into releasing cytokines necessary for an adequate antitumor response.

 

 


The investigators are currently planning clinical trials using the B7-H3 CAR T-cell construct in patients with solid tumors.

The work is supported by the Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration, the St. Baldrick’s Foundation, and Stand Up to Cancer. Dr. Majzner reported having no financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Majzner RG et al. ASPHO 2018, Abstract #PS2003.

 

– Call it the CAR of the future – an investigational chimeric antigen receptor–T cell construct targeted against an antigen highly expressed on pediatric solid tumors has shown promising efficacy in preclinical studies.

Investigators found that the antigen, labeled B7-H3, was expressed on 84% of microarrays of pediatric solid tumors. More importantly, a single dose of CAR targeted to B7-H3 caused complete regression of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma xenografts and improved survival over an untransduced, CD19-targeted CAR in mice, Robbie Majzner, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News
Dr. Robbie Majzner
“B7-H3 is a promising target for CAR therapy given that it’s highly and homogeneously expressed on pediatric solid tumors,” said Dr. Majzner, of Stanford University (Calif.).

Dr. Majzner was the recipient of an ASPHO young investigator award for his team’s research into developing a CAR T that could be as effective against solid tumors as other CAR Ts have been against hematologic malignancies such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Solid tumors are more challenging to target than leukemias or lymphomas because of the small number of antigens expressed on most pediatric tumors, he said.

“Over 95% of tumors have a very low rate of mutations, which means that they have very few neoantigens which the immune system can recognize in order to attack,” he said.

In the Children’s Oncology Group ADVL1412 trial, single-agent immunotherapy with the anti–programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor nivolumab (Opdivo) showed no evidence of efficacy against either Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, or measurable neuroblastoma. PD–ligand 1 was found to be expressed in only a few of the 43 tumors studied, suggesting that checkpoint inhibitor therapy is unlikely to work in these solid tumors, he said.

 

 


In contrast, B7-H3 is highly expressed on many different pediatric solid tumors, including rhabdomyosarcoma (95% of tumors stained), Ewing sarcoma (89%), Wilms tumor (100%), neuroblastoma (82%), ganglioneuroblastoma and ganglioneuroma (53%), medulloblastoma (96%), glioblastoma multiforme (84%), and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (100%).

To see whether CAR T therapy might have better efficacy than checkpoint inhibitors in this population, the investigators created a B7-H3 CAR using the B7-H3 tumor–specific monoclonal antibody MGA271, which has been shown to be safe in both adults and children in early clinical trials.

In human tumor xenograft models of osteosarcoma, all mice who received a single dose of the B7-H3 CAR survived at least 70 days after tumor engraftment, whereas all control mice, who received the CD19 CAR, died by day 60 (P = .0067). Similarly, in a model of Ewing sarcoma, all mice treated with B7-H3 survived at least 100 days, whereas all controls were dead by day 50 (P = .0015).

The B7-H3 construct also showed good activity against a model of medulloblastoma, showing that it was capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier.

 

 


Since B7-H3 has been reported to be expressed on both myeloid and lymphoid leukemia cells, the investigators also tested the CAR against a murine model of leukemia generated by injection of K562, a well-characterized line of myeloid leukemia cells.

“While we found some increase in survival in the mice that received the B7-H3 CAR T cells, compared to mice that received untransduced CAR T cells, this clearly is not as effective as in our solid tumor models,” Dr. Majzner said.

Going back to the cell line, they discovered that expression of B7-H3 was considerably lower in the K562 cells than in either the osteosarcoma or medulloblastoma cell lines used in their other models.

They found that both in vitro and in vivo, high levels of B7-H3 expression were necessary to provoke the immune system into releasing cytokines necessary for an adequate antitumor response.

 

 


The investigators are currently planning clinical trials using the B7-H3 CAR T-cell construct in patients with solid tumors.

The work is supported by the Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration, the St. Baldrick’s Foundation, and Stand Up to Cancer. Dr. Majzner reported having no financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Majzner RG et al. ASPHO 2018, Abstract #PS2003.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM ASPHO 2018

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: A CAR T-cell construct directed against B7-H3 showed efficacy against pediatric solid tumors in animal models.

Major finding: A single dose of the B7-H3 CAR caused complete regression of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma xenografts and extended survival in mice.

Study details: Preclinical research.

Disclosures: The work is supported by the Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration, St. Baldrick’s Foundation, and Stand Up to Cancer. Dr. Majzner reported having no financial disclosures.

Source: Majzner RG et al. ASPHO 2018, Abstract #PS2003.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article

Myelin antibody predicts ADEM relapse

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/07/2019 - 13:11

 

– There’s substantially higher risk of relapse and epilepsy after acute disseminated encephalomyelitis when children present with serum antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, according to British investigators.

“Traditionally, we told parents that ADEM [acute disseminated encephalomyelitis] is typically monophasic. I do tell parents now that the risk of relapse is higher if we see” myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-Ab), said senior investigator Yael Hacohen, MBBS, DPhil, a pediatric neurology lecturer at University College London.

There was also a strong trend for relapsing disease when children presented with seizures, and an increased risk of post-ADEM epilepsy with oligoclonal bands on cerebrospinal fluid analysis, a marker of inflammation.

ADEM is an acute CNS demyelinating disorder primarily affecting young children, often after upper respiratory tract infections and occasionally after measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination. Signs can include limb weakness, stumbling, and coma. Many children recover without incident, but some don’t.

There’s been an increasing number of reports of children – and adults – presenting with antibodies against MOG, a glycoprotein on the outermost layer of the myelin sheath. Its exact function is unknown, but antibodies have been found in a number of inflammatory CNS conditions, and its role in pathogenesis is being explored. Testing is available for clinical use, but it isn’t standardized. For now, titer levels aren’t being used to guide treatment at University College London, Dr. Hacohen said at the American Academy of Neurology annual meeting.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News
Dr. Yael Hacohen


The team reviewed 74 children with ADEM who presented at three pediatric neurology centers during 2005-2017, at a median age of 4.5 years. There were about equal numbers of boys and girls, and all had MRI abnormalities consistent with ADEM. Fifty children (68%) were MOG-ab positive.

 

 


Twenty-seven antibody-positive children (54%) relapsed, versus 3 of the 24 negative children (13%). Relapse was almost six times more likely with MOB-Ab (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-19.7; P = .002). The overall relapse rate of 42% (31/74) was higher than in previous studies, probably because of longer follow-up, lasting years in some cases.

Sixteen children (22%) presented with seizures, which nearly tripled the risk of relapse, although the finding wasn’t statistically significant (95% CI, 0.9-9.2; P = .06). There was a trend toward more seizures at onset in the MOG-Ab group.

Twelve children (16.2%) developed post-ADEM epilepsy, all but one MOG-Ab positive. The median time to seizure onset was 3 months. All of the children remained on antiepileptic medications at 2-year follow-up.

Oligoclonal bands were found in 8 of 37 children tested (22%), and also markedly increased the risk of post-ADEM seizures (odds ratio, 8.7; 95% CI, 1.5-54; P = .01).
 

 


“The majority of the children that we’ve looked at remain MOG-Ab positive. There may be a trend in antibody titers going down, but overall we didn’t find titers clinically useful. I know two children where titers went down. They relapsed,” and the titers went “up again, so we don’t’ really use them clinically for treatment,” Dr. Hacohen said.

“I think there is more to do” when it comes to optimizing ADEM management. “It’s a very heterogeneous [condition, and] I don’t want to put [everyone] on immunosuppression for years. I’ve got one patient who had an event, and 7 years later had a second event, and then was back to normal in a week.” On the other hand, “10%-20% of our patients do quite poorly and relapse on all treatments,” she said.

The investigators didn’t have any disclosures and there was no industry funding for the work.

SOURCE: Rossor T et al. Neurology. 2018 Apr 90(15 Suppl.):S35.004.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– There’s substantially higher risk of relapse and epilepsy after acute disseminated encephalomyelitis when children present with serum antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, according to British investigators.

“Traditionally, we told parents that ADEM [acute disseminated encephalomyelitis] is typically monophasic. I do tell parents now that the risk of relapse is higher if we see” myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-Ab), said senior investigator Yael Hacohen, MBBS, DPhil, a pediatric neurology lecturer at University College London.

There was also a strong trend for relapsing disease when children presented with seizures, and an increased risk of post-ADEM epilepsy with oligoclonal bands on cerebrospinal fluid analysis, a marker of inflammation.

ADEM is an acute CNS demyelinating disorder primarily affecting young children, often after upper respiratory tract infections and occasionally after measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination. Signs can include limb weakness, stumbling, and coma. Many children recover without incident, but some don’t.

There’s been an increasing number of reports of children – and adults – presenting with antibodies against MOG, a glycoprotein on the outermost layer of the myelin sheath. Its exact function is unknown, but antibodies have been found in a number of inflammatory CNS conditions, and its role in pathogenesis is being explored. Testing is available for clinical use, but it isn’t standardized. For now, titer levels aren’t being used to guide treatment at University College London, Dr. Hacohen said at the American Academy of Neurology annual meeting.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News
Dr. Yael Hacohen


The team reviewed 74 children with ADEM who presented at three pediatric neurology centers during 2005-2017, at a median age of 4.5 years. There were about equal numbers of boys and girls, and all had MRI abnormalities consistent with ADEM. Fifty children (68%) were MOG-ab positive.

 

 


Twenty-seven antibody-positive children (54%) relapsed, versus 3 of the 24 negative children (13%). Relapse was almost six times more likely with MOB-Ab (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-19.7; P = .002). The overall relapse rate of 42% (31/74) was higher than in previous studies, probably because of longer follow-up, lasting years in some cases.

Sixteen children (22%) presented with seizures, which nearly tripled the risk of relapse, although the finding wasn’t statistically significant (95% CI, 0.9-9.2; P = .06). There was a trend toward more seizures at onset in the MOG-Ab group.

Twelve children (16.2%) developed post-ADEM epilepsy, all but one MOG-Ab positive. The median time to seizure onset was 3 months. All of the children remained on antiepileptic medications at 2-year follow-up.

Oligoclonal bands were found in 8 of 37 children tested (22%), and also markedly increased the risk of post-ADEM seizures (odds ratio, 8.7; 95% CI, 1.5-54; P = .01).
 

 


“The majority of the children that we’ve looked at remain MOG-Ab positive. There may be a trend in antibody titers going down, but overall we didn’t find titers clinically useful. I know two children where titers went down. They relapsed,” and the titers went “up again, so we don’t’ really use them clinically for treatment,” Dr. Hacohen said.

“I think there is more to do” when it comes to optimizing ADEM management. “It’s a very heterogeneous [condition, and] I don’t want to put [everyone] on immunosuppression for years. I’ve got one patient who had an event, and 7 years later had a second event, and then was back to normal in a week.” On the other hand, “10%-20% of our patients do quite poorly and relapse on all treatments,” she said.

The investigators didn’t have any disclosures and there was no industry funding for the work.

SOURCE: Rossor T et al. Neurology. 2018 Apr 90(15 Suppl.):S35.004.

 

– There’s substantially higher risk of relapse and epilepsy after acute disseminated encephalomyelitis when children present with serum antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, according to British investigators.

“Traditionally, we told parents that ADEM [acute disseminated encephalomyelitis] is typically monophasic. I do tell parents now that the risk of relapse is higher if we see” myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-Ab), said senior investigator Yael Hacohen, MBBS, DPhil, a pediatric neurology lecturer at University College London.

There was also a strong trend for relapsing disease when children presented with seizures, and an increased risk of post-ADEM epilepsy with oligoclonal bands on cerebrospinal fluid analysis, a marker of inflammation.

ADEM is an acute CNS demyelinating disorder primarily affecting young children, often after upper respiratory tract infections and occasionally after measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination. Signs can include limb weakness, stumbling, and coma. Many children recover without incident, but some don’t.

There’s been an increasing number of reports of children – and adults – presenting with antibodies against MOG, a glycoprotein on the outermost layer of the myelin sheath. Its exact function is unknown, but antibodies have been found in a number of inflammatory CNS conditions, and its role in pathogenesis is being explored. Testing is available for clinical use, but it isn’t standardized. For now, titer levels aren’t being used to guide treatment at University College London, Dr. Hacohen said at the American Academy of Neurology annual meeting.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News
Dr. Yael Hacohen


The team reviewed 74 children with ADEM who presented at three pediatric neurology centers during 2005-2017, at a median age of 4.5 years. There were about equal numbers of boys and girls, and all had MRI abnormalities consistent with ADEM. Fifty children (68%) were MOG-ab positive.

 

 


Twenty-seven antibody-positive children (54%) relapsed, versus 3 of the 24 negative children (13%). Relapse was almost six times more likely with MOB-Ab (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-19.7; P = .002). The overall relapse rate of 42% (31/74) was higher than in previous studies, probably because of longer follow-up, lasting years in some cases.

Sixteen children (22%) presented with seizures, which nearly tripled the risk of relapse, although the finding wasn’t statistically significant (95% CI, 0.9-9.2; P = .06). There was a trend toward more seizures at onset in the MOG-Ab group.

Twelve children (16.2%) developed post-ADEM epilepsy, all but one MOG-Ab positive. The median time to seizure onset was 3 months. All of the children remained on antiepileptic medications at 2-year follow-up.

Oligoclonal bands were found in 8 of 37 children tested (22%), and also markedly increased the risk of post-ADEM seizures (odds ratio, 8.7; 95% CI, 1.5-54; P = .01).
 

 


“The majority of the children that we’ve looked at remain MOG-Ab positive. There may be a trend in antibody titers going down, but overall we didn’t find titers clinically useful. I know two children where titers went down. They relapsed,” and the titers went “up again, so we don’t’ really use them clinically for treatment,” Dr. Hacohen said.

“I think there is more to do” when it comes to optimizing ADEM management. “It’s a very heterogeneous [condition, and] I don’t want to put [everyone] on immunosuppression for years. I’ve got one patient who had an event, and 7 years later had a second event, and then was back to normal in a week.” On the other hand, “10%-20% of our patients do quite poorly and relapse on all treatments,” she said.

The investigators didn’t have any disclosures and there was no industry funding for the work.

SOURCE: Rossor T et al. Neurology. 2018 Apr 90(15 Suppl.):S35.004.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM AAN 2018

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies help to identify children who will have relapsing ADEM.

Major finding: Twenty-seven out of 50 antibody-positive children (54%) relapsed, versus 3 of 24 negative children (13%).

Study details: Review of 74 children with ADEM

Disclosures: There was no industry funding, and the investigators had no disclosures.

Source: Rossor T et al. Neurology. 2018 Apr 90(15 Suppl.):S35.004.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Diabetes spending topped $101 billion in 2013

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/03/2022 - 15:19

 

Spending on diabetes care in the United States showed its upward mobility by rising 175% from $37 billion in 1996 to $101 billion in 2013, according to investigators from the University of Washington, Seattle.

The largest share of personal health spending on diabetes in 2013 went for prescribed retail pharmaceuticals, which tallied over $58 billion. That was followed by ambulatory care at $24 billion, inpatient care at just under $10 billion, nursing home care at $9 billion, and emergency department care at $0.4 billion, Ellen Squires and her associates said in Diabetes Care.

The largest driver of the 175% ($64.4 billion) increase from 1996 to 2013 was the 76% that went to spending per encounter, which includes visits and prescriptions. Rising disease prevalence contributed about 50%, and population age (29.8%) and population size (29.5%) were nearly equal in their contribution, whereas service utilization (the number of visits and prescriptions) actually dropped almost 11%, the investigators said.



“The rate of increase in pharmaceutical spending was especially drastic from 2008 to 2013, and research suggests that these upward trends have continued in more recent years,” Ms. Squires and her associates wrote.

The analysis used data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation’s Disease Expenditure 2013 database and the Global Burden of Disease 2016 study. The current study was funded by the Peterson Center on Healthcare and the National Institute on Aging. One investigator receives research support from Medtronic Diabetes and is a consultant for Abbott Diabetes Care, Bigfoot Biomedical, Adocia, and Roche. No other relevant conflicts of interest were reported.

SOURCE: Squires E et al. Diabetes Care. 2018 May 10. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1376.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Spending on diabetes care in the United States showed its upward mobility by rising 175% from $37 billion in 1996 to $101 billion in 2013, according to investigators from the University of Washington, Seattle.

The largest share of personal health spending on diabetes in 2013 went for prescribed retail pharmaceuticals, which tallied over $58 billion. That was followed by ambulatory care at $24 billion, inpatient care at just under $10 billion, nursing home care at $9 billion, and emergency department care at $0.4 billion, Ellen Squires and her associates said in Diabetes Care.

The largest driver of the 175% ($64.4 billion) increase from 1996 to 2013 was the 76% that went to spending per encounter, which includes visits and prescriptions. Rising disease prevalence contributed about 50%, and population age (29.8%) and population size (29.5%) were nearly equal in their contribution, whereas service utilization (the number of visits and prescriptions) actually dropped almost 11%, the investigators said.



“The rate of increase in pharmaceutical spending was especially drastic from 2008 to 2013, and research suggests that these upward trends have continued in more recent years,” Ms. Squires and her associates wrote.

The analysis used data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation’s Disease Expenditure 2013 database and the Global Burden of Disease 2016 study. The current study was funded by the Peterson Center on Healthcare and the National Institute on Aging. One investigator receives research support from Medtronic Diabetes and is a consultant for Abbott Diabetes Care, Bigfoot Biomedical, Adocia, and Roche. No other relevant conflicts of interest were reported.

SOURCE: Squires E et al. Diabetes Care. 2018 May 10. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1376.

 

Spending on diabetes care in the United States showed its upward mobility by rising 175% from $37 billion in 1996 to $101 billion in 2013, according to investigators from the University of Washington, Seattle.

The largest share of personal health spending on diabetes in 2013 went for prescribed retail pharmaceuticals, which tallied over $58 billion. That was followed by ambulatory care at $24 billion, inpatient care at just under $10 billion, nursing home care at $9 billion, and emergency department care at $0.4 billion, Ellen Squires and her associates said in Diabetes Care.

The largest driver of the 175% ($64.4 billion) increase from 1996 to 2013 was the 76% that went to spending per encounter, which includes visits and prescriptions. Rising disease prevalence contributed about 50%, and population age (29.8%) and population size (29.5%) were nearly equal in their contribution, whereas service utilization (the number of visits and prescriptions) actually dropped almost 11%, the investigators said.



“The rate of increase in pharmaceutical spending was especially drastic from 2008 to 2013, and research suggests that these upward trends have continued in more recent years,” Ms. Squires and her associates wrote.

The analysis used data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation’s Disease Expenditure 2013 database and the Global Burden of Disease 2016 study. The current study was funded by the Peterson Center on Healthcare and the National Institute on Aging. One investigator receives research support from Medtronic Diabetes and is a consultant for Abbott Diabetes Care, Bigfoot Biomedical, Adocia, and Roche. No other relevant conflicts of interest were reported.

SOURCE: Squires E et al. Diabetes Care. 2018 May 10. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1376.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM DIABETES CARE

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

FDA: PrEP indication updated to include adolescents at risk of HIV infection

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:39

 

The following is the text of an announcement by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regarding a revision in the Truvada label to expand the PrEP indication to include at-risk adolescents. The new label change has not yet been posted.



The Food and Drug Administration approved revisions to the Truvada (emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) labeling to expand the Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) indication to include adolescents weighing at least 35 kg who are at risk of HIV-1 acquisition. The major labeling changes with respect to this expanded indication are summarized below. In addition, Section 8 was reformatted per the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR) and includes updated information specific to the use of Truvada for PrEP during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Other sections of labeling were reformatted for consistency with current and best labeling practices, as well as with labeling for other HIV fixed-dose combination products.

Indications and usage

1.2 HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)

Truvada is indicated in combination with safer sex practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to reduce the risk of sexually acquired HIV-1 in at-risk adults and adolescents weighing at least 35 kg. Individuals must have a negative HIV-1 test immediately prior to initiating Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP.

If clinical symptoms consistent with acute viral infection are present and recent (less than 1 month) exposures are suspected, delay starting PrEP for at least one month and reconfirm HIV-1 status or use a test cleared by the FDA as an aid in the diagnosis of HIV-1 infection, including acute or primary HIV-1 infection

When considering Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP, factors that help to identify individuals at risk may include:

– has partner(s) known to be HIV-1 infected, or

– engages in sexual activity within a high prevalence area or social network and has additional risk factors for HIV-1 acquisition, such as:

 

 

  • inconsistent or no condom use.
  • diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections.
  • exchange of sex for commodities (such as money, food, shelter, or drugs).
  • use of illicit drugs or alcohol dependence.
  • incarceration.
  • partner(s) of unknown HIV-1 status with any of the factors listed above.

Dosage and administration

2.1 Testing prior to initiation of Truvada for treatment of HIV-1 infection or for HIV-1 PrEP

Prior to or when initiating Truvada, test patients for hepatitis B virus infection [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)].

Prior to initiation and during use of Truvada, on a clinically appropriate schedule, assess serum creatinine, estimated creatinine clearance, urine glucose and urine protein in all patients. In patients with chronic kidney disease, also assess serum phosphorus

 

 


2.2 HIV-1 screening for individuals receiving Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP

Screen all patients for HIV-1 infection before initiating Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP and at least once every 3 months while taking Truvada



2.5 Recommended dosage for HIV-1 PrEP

The dosage of Truvada in HIV-1 uninfected adults and adolescents weighing at least 35 kg is one tablet (containing 200 mg of FTC and 300 mg of TDF) once daily taken orally with or without food.
 

 

6.0 Adverse reactions

Clinical trials in adolescent subjects

In a single-arm, open-label clinical trial (ATN113), in which 67 HIV-1 uninfected adolescent (15 to 18 years of age) men who have sex with men received Truvada once daily for HIV-1 PrEP, the safety profile of Truvada was similar to that observed in adults. Median duration to exposure of Truvada was 47 weeks.

In the ATN113 trial, median BMD increased from baseline to Week 48, +2.58% for lumbar spine and +0.72% for total body. One subject had significant (greater than or equal to 4%) total body BMD loss at Week 24. Median changes from baseline BMD Z-scores were 0.0 for lumbar spine and −0.2 for total body at Week 48. Three subjects showed a worsening (change from greater than −2 to less than or equal to −2) from baseline in their lumbar spine or total body BMD Z-scores at Week 24 or 48. Interpretation of these data, however, may be limited by the low rate of adherence to Truvada by Week 48.

8.4 Pediatric use

HIV-1 PrEP

The safety and effectiveness of Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP in at-risk adolescents weighing at least 35 kg is supported by data from adequate and well-controlled studies of Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP in adults with additional data from safety and pharmacokinetic studies in previously conducted trials with the individual drug products, FTC and TDF, in HIV-1 infected adults and pediatric subjects.

 

 

Safety, adherence, and resistance were evaluated in a single-arm, open-label clinical trial (ATN113) in which 67 HIV-1 uninfected at-risk adolescent men who have sex with men received Truvada once daily for HIV-1 PrEP. The mean age of subjects was 17 years (range, 15-18 years); 46% were Hispanic, 52% black, and 37% white. The safety profile of Truvada in ATN113 was similar to that observed in the adult HIV-1 PrEP trials.

In the ATN113 trial, HIV-1 seroconversion occurred in three subjects. Tenofovir diphosphate levels in dried blood spot assays indicate that these subjects had poor adherence. No tenofovir- or FTC-associated HIV-1 resistance substitutions were detected in virus isolated from the three subjects who seroconverted.

Adherence to study drug, as demonstrated by tenofovir diphosphate levels in dried blood spot assays, declined markedly after Week 12 once subjects switched from monthly to quarterly visits, suggesting that adolescents may benefit from more frequent visits and counseling.

12.0 Clinical pharmacology

HIV-1 PrEP

The pharmacokinetic data for tenofovir and FTC following administration of Truvada in HIV-1 uninfected adolescents weighing 35 kg and above are not available. The dosage recommendations of Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP in this population are based on safety and adherence data from the ATN113 trial [see Use in Specific Populations (8.4)] and known pharmacokinetic information in HIV-infected adolescents taking TDF and FTC for treatment.

 

 


ResistanceATN113 Trial

In ATN113, a clinical trial of HIV-1 seronegative adolescent subjects [see Use in Specific Populations (8.4)], no amino acid substitutions associated with resistance to FTC or TDF were detected at the time of seroconversion from any of the 3 subjects who became infected with HIV-1 during the trial. All 3 subjects who seroconverted were nonadherent to the recommended Truvada dosage.


The updated label will soon be available at drugs@fda or DailyMed.
Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The following is the text of an announcement by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regarding a revision in the Truvada label to expand the PrEP indication to include at-risk adolescents. The new label change has not yet been posted.



The Food and Drug Administration approved revisions to the Truvada (emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) labeling to expand the Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) indication to include adolescents weighing at least 35 kg who are at risk of HIV-1 acquisition. The major labeling changes with respect to this expanded indication are summarized below. In addition, Section 8 was reformatted per the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR) and includes updated information specific to the use of Truvada for PrEP during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Other sections of labeling were reformatted for consistency with current and best labeling practices, as well as with labeling for other HIV fixed-dose combination products.

Indications and usage

1.2 HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)

Truvada is indicated in combination with safer sex practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to reduce the risk of sexually acquired HIV-1 in at-risk adults and adolescents weighing at least 35 kg. Individuals must have a negative HIV-1 test immediately prior to initiating Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP.

If clinical symptoms consistent with acute viral infection are present and recent (less than 1 month) exposures are suspected, delay starting PrEP for at least one month and reconfirm HIV-1 status or use a test cleared by the FDA as an aid in the diagnosis of HIV-1 infection, including acute or primary HIV-1 infection

When considering Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP, factors that help to identify individuals at risk may include:

– has partner(s) known to be HIV-1 infected, or

– engages in sexual activity within a high prevalence area or social network and has additional risk factors for HIV-1 acquisition, such as:

 

 

  • inconsistent or no condom use.
  • diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections.
  • exchange of sex for commodities (such as money, food, shelter, or drugs).
  • use of illicit drugs or alcohol dependence.
  • incarceration.
  • partner(s) of unknown HIV-1 status with any of the factors listed above.

Dosage and administration

2.1 Testing prior to initiation of Truvada for treatment of HIV-1 infection or for HIV-1 PrEP

Prior to or when initiating Truvada, test patients for hepatitis B virus infection [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)].

Prior to initiation and during use of Truvada, on a clinically appropriate schedule, assess serum creatinine, estimated creatinine clearance, urine glucose and urine protein in all patients. In patients with chronic kidney disease, also assess serum phosphorus

 

 


2.2 HIV-1 screening for individuals receiving Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP

Screen all patients for HIV-1 infection before initiating Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP and at least once every 3 months while taking Truvada



2.5 Recommended dosage for HIV-1 PrEP

The dosage of Truvada in HIV-1 uninfected adults and adolescents weighing at least 35 kg is one tablet (containing 200 mg of FTC and 300 mg of TDF) once daily taken orally with or without food.
 

 

6.0 Adverse reactions

Clinical trials in adolescent subjects

In a single-arm, open-label clinical trial (ATN113), in which 67 HIV-1 uninfected adolescent (15 to 18 years of age) men who have sex with men received Truvada once daily for HIV-1 PrEP, the safety profile of Truvada was similar to that observed in adults. Median duration to exposure of Truvada was 47 weeks.

In the ATN113 trial, median BMD increased from baseline to Week 48, +2.58% for lumbar spine and +0.72% for total body. One subject had significant (greater than or equal to 4%) total body BMD loss at Week 24. Median changes from baseline BMD Z-scores were 0.0 for lumbar spine and −0.2 for total body at Week 48. Three subjects showed a worsening (change from greater than −2 to less than or equal to −2) from baseline in their lumbar spine or total body BMD Z-scores at Week 24 or 48. Interpretation of these data, however, may be limited by the low rate of adherence to Truvada by Week 48.

8.4 Pediatric use

HIV-1 PrEP

The safety and effectiveness of Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP in at-risk adolescents weighing at least 35 kg is supported by data from adequate and well-controlled studies of Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP in adults with additional data from safety and pharmacokinetic studies in previously conducted trials with the individual drug products, FTC and TDF, in HIV-1 infected adults and pediatric subjects.

 

 

Safety, adherence, and resistance were evaluated in a single-arm, open-label clinical trial (ATN113) in which 67 HIV-1 uninfected at-risk adolescent men who have sex with men received Truvada once daily for HIV-1 PrEP. The mean age of subjects was 17 years (range, 15-18 years); 46% were Hispanic, 52% black, and 37% white. The safety profile of Truvada in ATN113 was similar to that observed in the adult HIV-1 PrEP trials.

In the ATN113 trial, HIV-1 seroconversion occurred in three subjects. Tenofovir diphosphate levels in dried blood spot assays indicate that these subjects had poor adherence. No tenofovir- or FTC-associated HIV-1 resistance substitutions were detected in virus isolated from the three subjects who seroconverted.

Adherence to study drug, as demonstrated by tenofovir diphosphate levels in dried blood spot assays, declined markedly after Week 12 once subjects switched from monthly to quarterly visits, suggesting that adolescents may benefit from more frequent visits and counseling.

12.0 Clinical pharmacology

HIV-1 PrEP

The pharmacokinetic data for tenofovir and FTC following administration of Truvada in HIV-1 uninfected adolescents weighing 35 kg and above are not available. The dosage recommendations of Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP in this population are based on safety and adherence data from the ATN113 trial [see Use in Specific Populations (8.4)] and known pharmacokinetic information in HIV-infected adolescents taking TDF and FTC for treatment.

 

 


ResistanceATN113 Trial

In ATN113, a clinical trial of HIV-1 seronegative adolescent subjects [see Use in Specific Populations (8.4)], no amino acid substitutions associated with resistance to FTC or TDF were detected at the time of seroconversion from any of the 3 subjects who became infected with HIV-1 during the trial. All 3 subjects who seroconverted were nonadherent to the recommended Truvada dosage.


The updated label will soon be available at drugs@fda or DailyMed.

 

The following is the text of an announcement by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regarding a revision in the Truvada label to expand the PrEP indication to include at-risk adolescents. The new label change has not yet been posted.



The Food and Drug Administration approved revisions to the Truvada (emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) labeling to expand the Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) indication to include adolescents weighing at least 35 kg who are at risk of HIV-1 acquisition. The major labeling changes with respect to this expanded indication are summarized below. In addition, Section 8 was reformatted per the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR) and includes updated information specific to the use of Truvada for PrEP during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Other sections of labeling were reformatted for consistency with current and best labeling practices, as well as with labeling for other HIV fixed-dose combination products.

Indications and usage

1.2 HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)

Truvada is indicated in combination with safer sex practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to reduce the risk of sexually acquired HIV-1 in at-risk adults and adolescents weighing at least 35 kg. Individuals must have a negative HIV-1 test immediately prior to initiating Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP.

If clinical symptoms consistent with acute viral infection are present and recent (less than 1 month) exposures are suspected, delay starting PrEP for at least one month and reconfirm HIV-1 status or use a test cleared by the FDA as an aid in the diagnosis of HIV-1 infection, including acute or primary HIV-1 infection

When considering Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP, factors that help to identify individuals at risk may include:

– has partner(s) known to be HIV-1 infected, or

– engages in sexual activity within a high prevalence area or social network and has additional risk factors for HIV-1 acquisition, such as:

 

 

  • inconsistent or no condom use.
  • diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections.
  • exchange of sex for commodities (such as money, food, shelter, or drugs).
  • use of illicit drugs or alcohol dependence.
  • incarceration.
  • partner(s) of unknown HIV-1 status with any of the factors listed above.

Dosage and administration

2.1 Testing prior to initiation of Truvada for treatment of HIV-1 infection or for HIV-1 PrEP

Prior to or when initiating Truvada, test patients for hepatitis B virus infection [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)].

Prior to initiation and during use of Truvada, on a clinically appropriate schedule, assess serum creatinine, estimated creatinine clearance, urine glucose and urine protein in all patients. In patients with chronic kidney disease, also assess serum phosphorus

 

 


2.2 HIV-1 screening for individuals receiving Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP

Screen all patients for HIV-1 infection before initiating Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP and at least once every 3 months while taking Truvada



2.5 Recommended dosage for HIV-1 PrEP

The dosage of Truvada in HIV-1 uninfected adults and adolescents weighing at least 35 kg is one tablet (containing 200 mg of FTC and 300 mg of TDF) once daily taken orally with or without food.
 

 

6.0 Adverse reactions

Clinical trials in adolescent subjects

In a single-arm, open-label clinical trial (ATN113), in which 67 HIV-1 uninfected adolescent (15 to 18 years of age) men who have sex with men received Truvada once daily for HIV-1 PrEP, the safety profile of Truvada was similar to that observed in adults. Median duration to exposure of Truvada was 47 weeks.

In the ATN113 trial, median BMD increased from baseline to Week 48, +2.58% for lumbar spine and +0.72% for total body. One subject had significant (greater than or equal to 4%) total body BMD loss at Week 24. Median changes from baseline BMD Z-scores were 0.0 for lumbar spine and −0.2 for total body at Week 48. Three subjects showed a worsening (change from greater than −2 to less than or equal to −2) from baseline in their lumbar spine or total body BMD Z-scores at Week 24 or 48. Interpretation of these data, however, may be limited by the low rate of adherence to Truvada by Week 48.

8.4 Pediatric use

HIV-1 PrEP

The safety and effectiveness of Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP in at-risk adolescents weighing at least 35 kg is supported by data from adequate and well-controlled studies of Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP in adults with additional data from safety and pharmacokinetic studies in previously conducted trials with the individual drug products, FTC and TDF, in HIV-1 infected adults and pediatric subjects.

 

 

Safety, adherence, and resistance were evaluated in a single-arm, open-label clinical trial (ATN113) in which 67 HIV-1 uninfected at-risk adolescent men who have sex with men received Truvada once daily for HIV-1 PrEP. The mean age of subjects was 17 years (range, 15-18 years); 46% were Hispanic, 52% black, and 37% white. The safety profile of Truvada in ATN113 was similar to that observed in the adult HIV-1 PrEP trials.

In the ATN113 trial, HIV-1 seroconversion occurred in three subjects. Tenofovir diphosphate levels in dried blood spot assays indicate that these subjects had poor adherence. No tenofovir- or FTC-associated HIV-1 resistance substitutions were detected in virus isolated from the three subjects who seroconverted.

Adherence to study drug, as demonstrated by tenofovir diphosphate levels in dried blood spot assays, declined markedly after Week 12 once subjects switched from monthly to quarterly visits, suggesting that adolescents may benefit from more frequent visits and counseling.

12.0 Clinical pharmacology

HIV-1 PrEP

The pharmacokinetic data for tenofovir and FTC following administration of Truvada in HIV-1 uninfected adolescents weighing 35 kg and above are not available. The dosage recommendations of Truvada for HIV-1 PrEP in this population are based on safety and adherence data from the ATN113 trial [see Use in Specific Populations (8.4)] and known pharmacokinetic information in HIV-infected adolescents taking TDF and FTC for treatment.

 

 


ResistanceATN113 Trial

In ATN113, a clinical trial of HIV-1 seronegative adolescent subjects [see Use in Specific Populations (8.4)], no amino acid substitutions associated with resistance to FTC or TDF were detected at the time of seroconversion from any of the 3 subjects who became infected with HIV-1 during the trial. All 3 subjects who seroconverted were nonadherent to the recommended Truvada dosage.


The updated label will soon be available at drugs@fda or DailyMed.
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Study supports observation for select cases of porcelain gallbladder

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 10:09

 

Some adults with porcelain gallbladder may be eligible to forgo prophylactic cholecystectomy, suggest the results of a single-center retrospective study.

Over 1.7 years of median follow-up (range, 0 to 12.7 years), the observational group had no detected gallbladder malignancies and 4% developed adverse events versus 13% in the prophylactic cholecystectomy group (P = .15), wrote Haley DesJardins and her associates at Tufts University, Boston. The report was published in the Journal of the American College of Surgery.

The findings “still raise concern about an association between gallbladder wall calcifications and gallbladder malignancies, and therefore still suggest the need for cholecystectomy in the young, healthy, or symptomatic patient,” the researchers wrote. Nonetheless, surveillance for patients “who are poor surgical candidates is a reasonable approach, with a low risk of malignancy over a limited time frame.”

The investigators suggest that surgeons consider intervention when symptoms and workup points to gallbladder malignancy. But consider avoiding prophylactic cholecystectomy in patients with “limited life expectancy and significant comorbidities,” they emphasized. “Based on the results of this study, the act of prophylactic cholecystectomy for every single patient with gallbladder wall calcifications seems obsolete.”

The study comprised 113 patients with porcelain gallbladder diagnosed between 2004 and 2016. Radiographic reviews identified 70 definite cases and 43 “highly probable” cases. In all, 90 patients started out with observation only, of whom 26% with abdominal pain did not have cholecystectomy because of “significant comorbidities.” Four patients (4.4%) in the observational group subsequently underwent cholecystectomy for biliary colic, as part of liver transplantation, or for prophylactic reasons. None developed complications. In all, 11% developed new gallstones on follow-up imaging and 8% showed progression from focal to diffuse porcelain bladder, the researchers said. None developed gallbladder malignancy during 1.7 years of median follow-up.

jacoblund/Thinkstock
The operative group comprised 23 patients who underwent prophylactic cholecystectomy within 6 months of diagnosis. In all, 13% developed 30-day postoperative complications, including postoperative liver abscess after radical cholecystectomy, anastomotic biliary leakage after excision of the extra-hepatic bile duct for cholangiocarcinoma, and duodenal leak after synchronous repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer.

Histopathologies of the operative group identified two cases of gallbladder malignancy, of which one was detected on initial imaging. “This patient had a mass at the gallbladder infundibulum extending into the hepatic duct bifurcation,” the researchers explained. “It was not entirely evident whether the resected adenocarcinoma was originating from the gallbladder or from the bile duct. For the purpose of this study, this patient was listed as [having] gallbladder cancer.” The second case consisted of metastatic squamous cell gallbladder carcinoma.

 

 


The investigators concluded that “while it is seemingly very reasonable to observe asymptomatic patients with limited life expectancy and significant comorbidities, the decision to proceed with prophylactic cholecystectomy versus observation remains in the hands of the treating physician and patient; especially since absolute criteria or cut-offs cannot be defined at this point.”

No external funding sources were reported. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: DesJardins H et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr 22. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.026.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Some adults with porcelain gallbladder may be eligible to forgo prophylactic cholecystectomy, suggest the results of a single-center retrospective study.

Over 1.7 years of median follow-up (range, 0 to 12.7 years), the observational group had no detected gallbladder malignancies and 4% developed adverse events versus 13% in the prophylactic cholecystectomy group (P = .15), wrote Haley DesJardins and her associates at Tufts University, Boston. The report was published in the Journal of the American College of Surgery.

The findings “still raise concern about an association between gallbladder wall calcifications and gallbladder malignancies, and therefore still suggest the need for cholecystectomy in the young, healthy, or symptomatic patient,” the researchers wrote. Nonetheless, surveillance for patients “who are poor surgical candidates is a reasonable approach, with a low risk of malignancy over a limited time frame.”

The investigators suggest that surgeons consider intervention when symptoms and workup points to gallbladder malignancy. But consider avoiding prophylactic cholecystectomy in patients with “limited life expectancy and significant comorbidities,” they emphasized. “Based on the results of this study, the act of prophylactic cholecystectomy for every single patient with gallbladder wall calcifications seems obsolete.”

The study comprised 113 patients with porcelain gallbladder diagnosed between 2004 and 2016. Radiographic reviews identified 70 definite cases and 43 “highly probable” cases. In all, 90 patients started out with observation only, of whom 26% with abdominal pain did not have cholecystectomy because of “significant comorbidities.” Four patients (4.4%) in the observational group subsequently underwent cholecystectomy for biliary colic, as part of liver transplantation, or for prophylactic reasons. None developed complications. In all, 11% developed new gallstones on follow-up imaging and 8% showed progression from focal to diffuse porcelain bladder, the researchers said. None developed gallbladder malignancy during 1.7 years of median follow-up.

jacoblund/Thinkstock
The operative group comprised 23 patients who underwent prophylactic cholecystectomy within 6 months of diagnosis. In all, 13% developed 30-day postoperative complications, including postoperative liver abscess after radical cholecystectomy, anastomotic biliary leakage after excision of the extra-hepatic bile duct for cholangiocarcinoma, and duodenal leak after synchronous repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer.

Histopathologies of the operative group identified two cases of gallbladder malignancy, of which one was detected on initial imaging. “This patient had a mass at the gallbladder infundibulum extending into the hepatic duct bifurcation,” the researchers explained. “It was not entirely evident whether the resected adenocarcinoma was originating from the gallbladder or from the bile duct. For the purpose of this study, this patient was listed as [having] gallbladder cancer.” The second case consisted of metastatic squamous cell gallbladder carcinoma.

 

 


The investigators concluded that “while it is seemingly very reasonable to observe asymptomatic patients with limited life expectancy and significant comorbidities, the decision to proceed with prophylactic cholecystectomy versus observation remains in the hands of the treating physician and patient; especially since absolute criteria or cut-offs cannot be defined at this point.”

No external funding sources were reported. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: DesJardins H et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr 22. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.026.

 

Some adults with porcelain gallbladder may be eligible to forgo prophylactic cholecystectomy, suggest the results of a single-center retrospective study.

Over 1.7 years of median follow-up (range, 0 to 12.7 years), the observational group had no detected gallbladder malignancies and 4% developed adverse events versus 13% in the prophylactic cholecystectomy group (P = .15), wrote Haley DesJardins and her associates at Tufts University, Boston. The report was published in the Journal of the American College of Surgery.

The findings “still raise concern about an association between gallbladder wall calcifications and gallbladder malignancies, and therefore still suggest the need for cholecystectomy in the young, healthy, or symptomatic patient,” the researchers wrote. Nonetheless, surveillance for patients “who are poor surgical candidates is a reasonable approach, with a low risk of malignancy over a limited time frame.”

The investigators suggest that surgeons consider intervention when symptoms and workup points to gallbladder malignancy. But consider avoiding prophylactic cholecystectomy in patients with “limited life expectancy and significant comorbidities,” they emphasized. “Based on the results of this study, the act of prophylactic cholecystectomy for every single patient with gallbladder wall calcifications seems obsolete.”

The study comprised 113 patients with porcelain gallbladder diagnosed between 2004 and 2016. Radiographic reviews identified 70 definite cases and 43 “highly probable” cases. In all, 90 patients started out with observation only, of whom 26% with abdominal pain did not have cholecystectomy because of “significant comorbidities.” Four patients (4.4%) in the observational group subsequently underwent cholecystectomy for biliary colic, as part of liver transplantation, or for prophylactic reasons. None developed complications. In all, 11% developed new gallstones on follow-up imaging and 8% showed progression from focal to diffuse porcelain bladder, the researchers said. None developed gallbladder malignancy during 1.7 years of median follow-up.

jacoblund/Thinkstock
The operative group comprised 23 patients who underwent prophylactic cholecystectomy within 6 months of diagnosis. In all, 13% developed 30-day postoperative complications, including postoperative liver abscess after radical cholecystectomy, anastomotic biliary leakage after excision of the extra-hepatic bile duct for cholangiocarcinoma, and duodenal leak after synchronous repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer.

Histopathologies of the operative group identified two cases of gallbladder malignancy, of which one was detected on initial imaging. “This patient had a mass at the gallbladder infundibulum extending into the hepatic duct bifurcation,” the researchers explained. “It was not entirely evident whether the resected adenocarcinoma was originating from the gallbladder or from the bile duct. For the purpose of this study, this patient was listed as [having] gallbladder cancer.” The second case consisted of metastatic squamous cell gallbladder carcinoma.

 

 


The investigators concluded that “while it is seemingly very reasonable to observe asymptomatic patients with limited life expectancy and significant comorbidities, the decision to proceed with prophylactic cholecystectomy versus observation remains in the hands of the treating physician and patient; especially since absolute criteria or cut-offs cannot be defined at this point.”

No external funding sources were reported. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: DesJardins H et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr 22. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.026.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGERY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Observation is an option for select patients with porcelain gallbladder .

Major finding: Rates of adverse events were 4% with observation and 13% with surgery (P = .15).

Study details: Single-center retrospective cohort study of 113 patients.

Disclosures: No external funding sources were reported. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source: DesJardins H et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr 22. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.026.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Guidance coming for mTOR inhibitors in infantile TSC

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/07/2019 - 13:11

 

– Someday soon, physicians will probably have solid, evidence-based guidelines on how to use mTOR inhibitors in infants with tuberous sclerosis complex.

They couldn’t come soon enough. Everolimus (Afinitor) is being used off label more and more often in children under 2 years old for seizures and other manifestations of the genetic disorder, often with a decent response.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News
Dr. Darcy Krueger
But all the trials for everolimus and sirolimus (Rapamune), the other mTOR [mammalian target of rapamycin] inhibitor used in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), were done in older children and adults, so there’s uncertainty about using them in infants, and wide variation in how they’re used. Also, the few available case reports and series raise the possibility that side effects might be more common and perhaps serious in the very young, according to Darcy Krueger, MD, PhD, director of the Tuberous Sclerosis Clinic at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital.

“I get emails all the time saying ‘how would you start treatment at this age?’ and we say there are no data,” he said at the American Academy of Neurology annual meeting.

Dr. Krueger presented a survey of 19 TSC centers to get the ball rolling. They reported on treating 45 children under 2 years old, at least one child at each center. The goal of the survey was to establish a baseline “to allow us to move forward with what proper studies would look like, and what needs to be done. Two-thirds of patients have seizures before their first birthday; we need to establish a safety [and efficacy] profile well before 2 years of age,” and evidence-based guidelines, he said.

On average, everolimus treatment started at 11.7 months, and continued for 27 months. Sirolimus treatment started at a mean of 16 months and continued for 16 months. Dosing ranged from once a week to daily. In contrast to case reports that skew heavily toward rhabdomyomas, most of the children were treated for epilepsy and subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA). Almost all the centers had participated in a clinical evaluation of everolimus for TSC epilepsy and SEGAs in older children, “so there was familiarity and a comfort level” for those indications, Dr. Krueger said.

Everolimus was used much more often than was sirolimus, which probably reflects ongoing clinical development of the drug. A handful of children switched between the two, probably because of side effects. Most centers reported a favorable response. The average initial daily dose of everolimus was 1.05 mg/m2; the average initial daily dose of sirolimus was 0.42 mg/m2.

 

 


Thirty-five children (78%) had an adverse event (AE), usually infections or lipid problems. Most were mild or moderate and didn’t affect treatment. Seven children (16%) had severe grade 3 events.

“The frequency of these AEs and the severity and type were not different from the earlier trials,” but almost 40% of the children discontinued treatment due to AEs, which was “much higher” than in past trials. “I think this represents the lack of real data with which to guide clinical judgment. There was a high tendency with any AE for discontinuation,” Dr. Krueger said.



There were more boys than girls among the 45 children. The majority were from the United States, and predominantly Cincinnati Children’s Hospital. Most had TSC2 mutations, which are associated with worse disease than TSC1 mutations.

Dr. Krueger reported research funding and personal compensation from Novartis, maker of everolimus. Almost all of his coinvestigators reported ties to the company. The work was supported by the Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance, which is funded in part by Novartis.

SOURCE: Krueger D et al. Neurology. 2018 Apr 90(15 Suppl.):S35.003.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Someday soon, physicians will probably have solid, evidence-based guidelines on how to use mTOR inhibitors in infants with tuberous sclerosis complex.

They couldn’t come soon enough. Everolimus (Afinitor) is being used off label more and more often in children under 2 years old for seizures and other manifestations of the genetic disorder, often with a decent response.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News
Dr. Darcy Krueger
But all the trials for everolimus and sirolimus (Rapamune), the other mTOR [mammalian target of rapamycin] inhibitor used in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), were done in older children and adults, so there’s uncertainty about using them in infants, and wide variation in how they’re used. Also, the few available case reports and series raise the possibility that side effects might be more common and perhaps serious in the very young, according to Darcy Krueger, MD, PhD, director of the Tuberous Sclerosis Clinic at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital.

“I get emails all the time saying ‘how would you start treatment at this age?’ and we say there are no data,” he said at the American Academy of Neurology annual meeting.

Dr. Krueger presented a survey of 19 TSC centers to get the ball rolling. They reported on treating 45 children under 2 years old, at least one child at each center. The goal of the survey was to establish a baseline “to allow us to move forward with what proper studies would look like, and what needs to be done. Two-thirds of patients have seizures before their first birthday; we need to establish a safety [and efficacy] profile well before 2 years of age,” and evidence-based guidelines, he said.

On average, everolimus treatment started at 11.7 months, and continued for 27 months. Sirolimus treatment started at a mean of 16 months and continued for 16 months. Dosing ranged from once a week to daily. In contrast to case reports that skew heavily toward rhabdomyomas, most of the children were treated for epilepsy and subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA). Almost all the centers had participated in a clinical evaluation of everolimus for TSC epilepsy and SEGAs in older children, “so there was familiarity and a comfort level” for those indications, Dr. Krueger said.

Everolimus was used much more often than was sirolimus, which probably reflects ongoing clinical development of the drug. A handful of children switched between the two, probably because of side effects. Most centers reported a favorable response. The average initial daily dose of everolimus was 1.05 mg/m2; the average initial daily dose of sirolimus was 0.42 mg/m2.

 

 


Thirty-five children (78%) had an adverse event (AE), usually infections or lipid problems. Most were mild or moderate and didn’t affect treatment. Seven children (16%) had severe grade 3 events.

“The frequency of these AEs and the severity and type were not different from the earlier trials,” but almost 40% of the children discontinued treatment due to AEs, which was “much higher” than in past trials. “I think this represents the lack of real data with which to guide clinical judgment. There was a high tendency with any AE for discontinuation,” Dr. Krueger said.



There were more boys than girls among the 45 children. The majority were from the United States, and predominantly Cincinnati Children’s Hospital. Most had TSC2 mutations, which are associated with worse disease than TSC1 mutations.

Dr. Krueger reported research funding and personal compensation from Novartis, maker of everolimus. Almost all of his coinvestigators reported ties to the company. The work was supported by the Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance, which is funded in part by Novartis.

SOURCE: Krueger D et al. Neurology. 2018 Apr 90(15 Suppl.):S35.003.

 

– Someday soon, physicians will probably have solid, evidence-based guidelines on how to use mTOR inhibitors in infants with tuberous sclerosis complex.

They couldn’t come soon enough. Everolimus (Afinitor) is being used off label more and more often in children under 2 years old for seizures and other manifestations of the genetic disorder, often with a decent response.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News
Dr. Darcy Krueger
But all the trials for everolimus and sirolimus (Rapamune), the other mTOR [mammalian target of rapamycin] inhibitor used in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), were done in older children and adults, so there’s uncertainty about using them in infants, and wide variation in how they’re used. Also, the few available case reports and series raise the possibility that side effects might be more common and perhaps serious in the very young, according to Darcy Krueger, MD, PhD, director of the Tuberous Sclerosis Clinic at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital.

“I get emails all the time saying ‘how would you start treatment at this age?’ and we say there are no data,” he said at the American Academy of Neurology annual meeting.

Dr. Krueger presented a survey of 19 TSC centers to get the ball rolling. They reported on treating 45 children under 2 years old, at least one child at each center. The goal of the survey was to establish a baseline “to allow us to move forward with what proper studies would look like, and what needs to be done. Two-thirds of patients have seizures before their first birthday; we need to establish a safety [and efficacy] profile well before 2 years of age,” and evidence-based guidelines, he said.

On average, everolimus treatment started at 11.7 months, and continued for 27 months. Sirolimus treatment started at a mean of 16 months and continued for 16 months. Dosing ranged from once a week to daily. In contrast to case reports that skew heavily toward rhabdomyomas, most of the children were treated for epilepsy and subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA). Almost all the centers had participated in a clinical evaluation of everolimus for TSC epilepsy and SEGAs in older children, “so there was familiarity and a comfort level” for those indications, Dr. Krueger said.

Everolimus was used much more often than was sirolimus, which probably reflects ongoing clinical development of the drug. A handful of children switched between the two, probably because of side effects. Most centers reported a favorable response. The average initial daily dose of everolimus was 1.05 mg/m2; the average initial daily dose of sirolimus was 0.42 mg/m2.

 

 


Thirty-five children (78%) had an adverse event (AE), usually infections or lipid problems. Most were mild or moderate and didn’t affect treatment. Seven children (16%) had severe grade 3 events.

“The frequency of these AEs and the severity and type were not different from the earlier trials,” but almost 40% of the children discontinued treatment due to AEs, which was “much higher” than in past trials. “I think this represents the lack of real data with which to guide clinical judgment. There was a high tendency with any AE for discontinuation,” Dr. Krueger said.



There were more boys than girls among the 45 children. The majority were from the United States, and predominantly Cincinnati Children’s Hospital. Most had TSC2 mutations, which are associated with worse disease than TSC1 mutations.

Dr. Krueger reported research funding and personal compensation from Novartis, maker of everolimus. Almost all of his coinvestigators reported ties to the company. The work was supported by the Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance, which is funded in part by Novartis.

SOURCE: Krueger D et al. Neurology. 2018 Apr 90(15 Suppl.):S35.003.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM AAN 2018

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: A survey of treatment centers has begun to plug the evidence gap for using mTOR inhibitors in infants with tuberous sclerosis.

Major finding: Adverse events don’t seem more common than in trials of adults and older children, but the discontinuation rate is much higher, at about 40%.

Study details: Review of 45 children under 2 years old.

Disclosures: The lead investigator reported research funding and personal compensation from Novartis, maker of everolimus.

Source: Krueger D et al. Neurology. 2018 Apr 90(15 Suppl.):S35.003.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Long-acting bronchodilators increase CVD risk in certain COPD patients

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/14/2018 - 11:53

Background: Long-acting inhaled bronchodilator use (LABA or LAMA) in patients with COPD is the mainstay of treatment. Prior studies have reported a possible interaction between LABA or LAMA use and increased rates of cardiovascular events; however, the results have been variable. The findings have been confounded by incomplete medical records, exclusion of patients with CVD in bronchodilator trials, and high patient drop out rates. This study aims to assess the association between LABA or LAMA use in patients with COPD and the risk of CVD.

Study design: Nested case control study.

Setting: Taiwanese national database.

Synopsis: This study included 284,200 LABA and LAMA naive patients who were aged 40 years or older and had COPD (mean age, 71.4 years); it retrieved health care claims data from 2007 through 2011 for these patients from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. During a mean follow-up of 2.0 years, 37,719 patients experienced a cardiovascular event, and 146,139 matched controls were identified. LABA or LAMA use was measured in the year preceding the cardiovascular event and stratified by duration since initiation of LABA or LAMA treatment. Logistical regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios of CVD from LABA and LAMA treatment. New LABA use was associated with a 1.50-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.35-1.67; P less than .001) increased cardiovascular risk within 30 days of initiation, and new LAMA use was associated with a 1.52 fold (95% CI, 1.28-1.80; P less than .001) increased risk. In patients with prevalent LABA or LAMA use, the risk of CVD was absent or reduced.

Key limitations included the omission of contributors to cardiovascular disease, including smoking status and alcohol consumption, in the final analysis. Also, the contribution of worsening COPD to cardiovascular events was not accounted for.

Bottom line: Initiation of inhaled LABAs or LAMAs in patients with COPD is associated with a 1.5-fold increased risk of cardiovascular disease – including emergency or inpatient care for coronary artery disease, heart failure, ischemic stroke, or arrhythmia – in the first 30 days.

Citation: Wang MT et al. Association of cardiovascular risk with inhaled long-acting bronchodilators in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178(2):229-38.

Dr. Skinner is a hospitalist at Denver Health Medical Center and an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Background: Long-acting inhaled bronchodilator use (LABA or LAMA) in patients with COPD is the mainstay of treatment. Prior studies have reported a possible interaction between LABA or LAMA use and increased rates of cardiovascular events; however, the results have been variable. The findings have been confounded by incomplete medical records, exclusion of patients with CVD in bronchodilator trials, and high patient drop out rates. This study aims to assess the association between LABA or LAMA use in patients with COPD and the risk of CVD.

Study design: Nested case control study.

Setting: Taiwanese national database.

Synopsis: This study included 284,200 LABA and LAMA naive patients who were aged 40 years or older and had COPD (mean age, 71.4 years); it retrieved health care claims data from 2007 through 2011 for these patients from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. During a mean follow-up of 2.0 years, 37,719 patients experienced a cardiovascular event, and 146,139 matched controls were identified. LABA or LAMA use was measured in the year preceding the cardiovascular event and stratified by duration since initiation of LABA or LAMA treatment. Logistical regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios of CVD from LABA and LAMA treatment. New LABA use was associated with a 1.50-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.35-1.67; P less than .001) increased cardiovascular risk within 30 days of initiation, and new LAMA use was associated with a 1.52 fold (95% CI, 1.28-1.80; P less than .001) increased risk. In patients with prevalent LABA or LAMA use, the risk of CVD was absent or reduced.

Key limitations included the omission of contributors to cardiovascular disease, including smoking status and alcohol consumption, in the final analysis. Also, the contribution of worsening COPD to cardiovascular events was not accounted for.

Bottom line: Initiation of inhaled LABAs or LAMAs in patients with COPD is associated with a 1.5-fold increased risk of cardiovascular disease – including emergency or inpatient care for coronary artery disease, heart failure, ischemic stroke, or arrhythmia – in the first 30 days.

Citation: Wang MT et al. Association of cardiovascular risk with inhaled long-acting bronchodilators in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178(2):229-38.

Dr. Skinner is a hospitalist at Denver Health Medical Center and an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora.

Background: Long-acting inhaled bronchodilator use (LABA or LAMA) in patients with COPD is the mainstay of treatment. Prior studies have reported a possible interaction between LABA or LAMA use and increased rates of cardiovascular events; however, the results have been variable. The findings have been confounded by incomplete medical records, exclusion of patients with CVD in bronchodilator trials, and high patient drop out rates. This study aims to assess the association between LABA or LAMA use in patients with COPD and the risk of CVD.

Study design: Nested case control study.

Setting: Taiwanese national database.

Synopsis: This study included 284,200 LABA and LAMA naive patients who were aged 40 years or older and had COPD (mean age, 71.4 years); it retrieved health care claims data from 2007 through 2011 for these patients from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. During a mean follow-up of 2.0 years, 37,719 patients experienced a cardiovascular event, and 146,139 matched controls were identified. LABA or LAMA use was measured in the year preceding the cardiovascular event and stratified by duration since initiation of LABA or LAMA treatment. Logistical regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios of CVD from LABA and LAMA treatment. New LABA use was associated with a 1.50-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.35-1.67; P less than .001) increased cardiovascular risk within 30 days of initiation, and new LAMA use was associated with a 1.52 fold (95% CI, 1.28-1.80; P less than .001) increased risk. In patients with prevalent LABA or LAMA use, the risk of CVD was absent or reduced.

Key limitations included the omission of contributors to cardiovascular disease, including smoking status and alcohol consumption, in the final analysis. Also, the contribution of worsening COPD to cardiovascular events was not accounted for.

Bottom line: Initiation of inhaled LABAs or LAMAs in patients with COPD is associated with a 1.5-fold increased risk of cardiovascular disease – including emergency or inpatient care for coronary artery disease, heart failure, ischemic stroke, or arrhythmia – in the first 30 days.

Citation: Wang MT et al. Association of cardiovascular risk with inhaled long-acting bronchodilators in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178(2):229-38.

Dr. Skinner is a hospitalist at Denver Health Medical Center and an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

ESBL-B before colorectal surgery ups risk of surgical site infection

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:39

 

– Patients who are carriers of extended-spectrum beta lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-B) before colorectal surgery are at more than double the risk of surgical site infection, despite a standard prophylactic antibiotic regimen.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) occurred in 23% of those who tested positive for the pathogens preoperatively, compared with 10.5% of ESBL-B–negative patients – a significant increased risk of 2.25, Yehuda Carmeli, MD, said at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

ESBL-B was not the infective pathogen in most infection cases, but being a carrier increased the likelihood of an ESBL-B SSI. ESBL-B was the pathogen in 7.2% of the carriers and 1.6% of the noncarriers. However, investigators are still working to determine if the species present in the wound infection are the same as the ones present at baseline, said Dr. Carmeli of Tel Aviv Medical Center.

CDC/James Arche/Illustrators: Alissa Eckert and Jennifer Oosthuizen
But clearly, he said, the presence of ESBL-B before colorectal surgery is a risk that can’t be ignored – and that can’t be reduced with traditional preoperative precautions. A better alternative for these patients would most likely be a carbapenem. Dr. Carmeli’s colleague, Amir Nutman, MD, explored this idea in a related study, which also was presented at the meeting. It determined that ertapenem was a much better choice, cutting surgical site infections by 41% in ESBL-B carriers

All of these results are emerging from the WP4 study, which was carried out in three hospitals in Serbia, Switzerland, and Israel. Designed as a before-and-after trial, it tested the theory that identifying ESBL carriers and targeting presurgical antibiotic prophylaxis could improve their surgical outcomes.

WP4 was one of five studies in the multinational R-GNOSIS project. “Resistance in Gram-Negative Organisms: Studying Intervention Strategies” is a 12-million-euro, 5-year European collaborative research project designed to identify effective interventions for reducing the carriage, infection, and spread of multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. From 2012 to 2017, WP4 enrolled almost 4,000 adults scheduled to undergo colorectal surgery (excluding appendectomy or minor anorectal procedures).

Several of the studies were reported at ECCMID 2018.

 

 


This portion of R-GNOSIS was intended to investigate the relationship between ESBL-B carriage and postoperative surgical site infections among colorectal surgery patients.

The study comprised 3,626 patients who were preoperatively screened for ESBL-B within 2 weeks of colorectal surgery. The ESBL-B carriage rate was 15.3% overall, but ranged from 12% to 20% by site. Of the carriers, 222 were included in this study sample. They were randomly matched with 444 noncarriers.

Anywhere from 2 weeks to 2 days before surgery, all of the patients received a standard prophylactic antibiotic. This was most often an infusion of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 500 mg metronidazole. Other cephalosporins were allowed at the clinician’s discretion.

Patients were a mean of 62 years old. Nearly half (48%) had cardiovascular disease and about a third had undergone a prior colorectal surgical procedure. Cancer was the surgical indication in about 70%. Other indications were inflammatory bowel disease and diverticular disease.
 

 



Michele G Sullivan/MDedge News
Dr. Yehuda Carmeli
The study’s primary outcome was surgical site infection, which was assessed regularly during the hospital stay, at discharge, and by clinic visit or telephone call 30 days after discharge. The secondary outcomes were deep space surgical site infections and infections caused specifically by ESBL-B. ESBL-B was significantly associated with both surgical site infection (OR 2.25) and deep space infection (OR 2.25).

A multivariate analysis controlled for age, cardiovascular disease, indication for surgery, and whether the procedure included a rectal resection, retention of drain at the surgical site, or stoma. The model also controlled for National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance score, a three-point scale that estimates surgical infection risk. Among this cohort, 48% were at low risk, 43% at moderate risk, and 10% at high risk.

Dr. Carmeli made no financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Carmeli et al, ECCMID 2018, Oral Abstract O1133.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Patients who are carriers of extended-spectrum beta lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-B) before colorectal surgery are at more than double the risk of surgical site infection, despite a standard prophylactic antibiotic regimen.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) occurred in 23% of those who tested positive for the pathogens preoperatively, compared with 10.5% of ESBL-B–negative patients – a significant increased risk of 2.25, Yehuda Carmeli, MD, said at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

ESBL-B was not the infective pathogen in most infection cases, but being a carrier increased the likelihood of an ESBL-B SSI. ESBL-B was the pathogen in 7.2% of the carriers and 1.6% of the noncarriers. However, investigators are still working to determine if the species present in the wound infection are the same as the ones present at baseline, said Dr. Carmeli of Tel Aviv Medical Center.

CDC/James Arche/Illustrators: Alissa Eckert and Jennifer Oosthuizen
But clearly, he said, the presence of ESBL-B before colorectal surgery is a risk that can’t be ignored – and that can’t be reduced with traditional preoperative precautions. A better alternative for these patients would most likely be a carbapenem. Dr. Carmeli’s colleague, Amir Nutman, MD, explored this idea in a related study, which also was presented at the meeting. It determined that ertapenem was a much better choice, cutting surgical site infections by 41% in ESBL-B carriers

All of these results are emerging from the WP4 study, which was carried out in three hospitals in Serbia, Switzerland, and Israel. Designed as a before-and-after trial, it tested the theory that identifying ESBL carriers and targeting presurgical antibiotic prophylaxis could improve their surgical outcomes.

WP4 was one of five studies in the multinational R-GNOSIS project. “Resistance in Gram-Negative Organisms: Studying Intervention Strategies” is a 12-million-euro, 5-year European collaborative research project designed to identify effective interventions for reducing the carriage, infection, and spread of multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. From 2012 to 2017, WP4 enrolled almost 4,000 adults scheduled to undergo colorectal surgery (excluding appendectomy or minor anorectal procedures).

Several of the studies were reported at ECCMID 2018.

 

 


This portion of R-GNOSIS was intended to investigate the relationship between ESBL-B carriage and postoperative surgical site infections among colorectal surgery patients.

The study comprised 3,626 patients who were preoperatively screened for ESBL-B within 2 weeks of colorectal surgery. The ESBL-B carriage rate was 15.3% overall, but ranged from 12% to 20% by site. Of the carriers, 222 were included in this study sample. They were randomly matched with 444 noncarriers.

Anywhere from 2 weeks to 2 days before surgery, all of the patients received a standard prophylactic antibiotic. This was most often an infusion of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 500 mg metronidazole. Other cephalosporins were allowed at the clinician’s discretion.

Patients were a mean of 62 years old. Nearly half (48%) had cardiovascular disease and about a third had undergone a prior colorectal surgical procedure. Cancer was the surgical indication in about 70%. Other indications were inflammatory bowel disease and diverticular disease.
 

 



Michele G Sullivan/MDedge News
Dr. Yehuda Carmeli
The study’s primary outcome was surgical site infection, which was assessed regularly during the hospital stay, at discharge, and by clinic visit or telephone call 30 days after discharge. The secondary outcomes were deep space surgical site infections and infections caused specifically by ESBL-B. ESBL-B was significantly associated with both surgical site infection (OR 2.25) and deep space infection (OR 2.25).

A multivariate analysis controlled for age, cardiovascular disease, indication for surgery, and whether the procedure included a rectal resection, retention of drain at the surgical site, or stoma. The model also controlled for National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance score, a three-point scale that estimates surgical infection risk. Among this cohort, 48% were at low risk, 43% at moderate risk, and 10% at high risk.

Dr. Carmeli made no financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Carmeli et al, ECCMID 2018, Oral Abstract O1133.

 

– Patients who are carriers of extended-spectrum beta lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-B) before colorectal surgery are at more than double the risk of surgical site infection, despite a standard prophylactic antibiotic regimen.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) occurred in 23% of those who tested positive for the pathogens preoperatively, compared with 10.5% of ESBL-B–negative patients – a significant increased risk of 2.25, Yehuda Carmeli, MD, said at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

ESBL-B was not the infective pathogen in most infection cases, but being a carrier increased the likelihood of an ESBL-B SSI. ESBL-B was the pathogen in 7.2% of the carriers and 1.6% of the noncarriers. However, investigators are still working to determine if the species present in the wound infection are the same as the ones present at baseline, said Dr. Carmeli of Tel Aviv Medical Center.

CDC/James Arche/Illustrators: Alissa Eckert and Jennifer Oosthuizen
But clearly, he said, the presence of ESBL-B before colorectal surgery is a risk that can’t be ignored – and that can’t be reduced with traditional preoperative precautions. A better alternative for these patients would most likely be a carbapenem. Dr. Carmeli’s colleague, Amir Nutman, MD, explored this idea in a related study, which also was presented at the meeting. It determined that ertapenem was a much better choice, cutting surgical site infections by 41% in ESBL-B carriers

All of these results are emerging from the WP4 study, which was carried out in three hospitals in Serbia, Switzerland, and Israel. Designed as a before-and-after trial, it tested the theory that identifying ESBL carriers and targeting presurgical antibiotic prophylaxis could improve their surgical outcomes.

WP4 was one of five studies in the multinational R-GNOSIS project. “Resistance in Gram-Negative Organisms: Studying Intervention Strategies” is a 12-million-euro, 5-year European collaborative research project designed to identify effective interventions for reducing the carriage, infection, and spread of multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. From 2012 to 2017, WP4 enrolled almost 4,000 adults scheduled to undergo colorectal surgery (excluding appendectomy or minor anorectal procedures).

Several of the studies were reported at ECCMID 2018.

 

 


This portion of R-GNOSIS was intended to investigate the relationship between ESBL-B carriage and postoperative surgical site infections among colorectal surgery patients.

The study comprised 3,626 patients who were preoperatively screened for ESBL-B within 2 weeks of colorectal surgery. The ESBL-B carriage rate was 15.3% overall, but ranged from 12% to 20% by site. Of the carriers, 222 were included in this study sample. They were randomly matched with 444 noncarriers.

Anywhere from 2 weeks to 2 days before surgery, all of the patients received a standard prophylactic antibiotic. This was most often an infusion of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 500 mg metronidazole. Other cephalosporins were allowed at the clinician’s discretion.

Patients were a mean of 62 years old. Nearly half (48%) had cardiovascular disease and about a third had undergone a prior colorectal surgical procedure. Cancer was the surgical indication in about 70%. Other indications were inflammatory bowel disease and diverticular disease.
 

 



Michele G Sullivan/MDedge News
Dr. Yehuda Carmeli
The study’s primary outcome was surgical site infection, which was assessed regularly during the hospital stay, at discharge, and by clinic visit or telephone call 30 days after discharge. The secondary outcomes were deep space surgical site infections and infections caused specifically by ESBL-B. ESBL-B was significantly associated with both surgical site infection (OR 2.25) and deep space infection (OR 2.25).

A multivariate analysis controlled for age, cardiovascular disease, indication for surgery, and whether the procedure included a rectal resection, retention of drain at the surgical site, or stoma. The model also controlled for National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance score, a three-point scale that estimates surgical infection risk. Among this cohort, 48% were at low risk, 43% at moderate risk, and 10% at high risk.

Dr. Carmeli made no financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Carmeli et al, ECCMID 2018, Oral Abstract O1133.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM ECCMID 2018

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: ESBL-B colonization increased the risk of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery, despite use of standard preoperative antibiotics.

Major finding: ESBL-B carriage more than doubled the risk of a colorectal surgical site infection by (OR 2.25).

Study details: The prospective study comprised 222 carriers and 444 noncarriers.

Disclosures: The study is part of the R-GNOSIS project, a 12-million-euro, 5-year European collaborative research project designed to identify effective interventions for reducing the carriage, infection, and spread of multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

Source: Carmeli Y et al. ECCMID 2018, Oral Abstract O1130.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Simple QI intervention helped improve HPV vaccination rates

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:39

 

– Teaching simple quality improvement principles to individual pediatric practices can improve adolescent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates, results from a multicenter study showed.

“We know that HPV vaccination rates are low, and there have been many efforts to improve the vaccination rates nationwide,” one of the study authors, Manika Suryadevara, MD, said in an interview at the Pediatric Academic Societies meeting. “One reason that vaccine rates are low in adolescents is missed opportunities. Adolescents don’t always show up for routine well-child visits where immunization records are reviewed, but they may show up with a cold, a sprained ankle, or a hospital follow-up. Providers do not routinely check immunizations at these visits, then don’t recommend vaccine to those who need it. These are the missed opportunities we need to act upon.”

Doug Brunk/MDedge News
Dr. Manika Suryadevara
Dr. Suryadevara, of the State University of New York Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, and her associates recruited five large pediatric practices from the New York American Academy of Pediatrics Chapter 1 to participate in a quality improvement (QI) project aimed at reducing missed vaccination opportunities in an effort to improve vaccine completion rates. The project began by having one clinical provider and one staff member from each practice attend an educational training session about QI principles and tools such as a value stream map, an impact matrix, and plan-do-study-act cycles. The training session also covered HPV epidemiology and associated cancers, vaccination rates, and recommended systematic changes to improve practice vaccination rates. Following the training session, representatives from each practice performed a monthly chart review of 10-20 consecutive patients aged 11-12 years seen in the office and collected data regarding patient gender and age, type of visit (well-child, acute, follow-up, nurse-only), if HPV vaccine was due or not, provider vaccine recommendation documentation, and vaccines administered, “so they can see where their missed opportunities were,” she said.

Data were entered into the AAP Quality Improvement Data Aggregator and run charts were printed. Next, each practice held monthly team meetings for 5 months to discuss chart review data, run chart results, and to determine intervention change for the next cycle. “Most of the interventions included standing orders, optimizing nurse’s visits, using electronic medical reminders to review immunization records, and having immunization records pulled for all adolescents who show up in their practice,” Dr. Suryadevara said. “The goal of these systematic changes is to make the work flow seamless.”

Analysis of run chart data revealed that over the five monthly cycles, the HPV vaccine completion rate improved from 45% to 65%, while the overall HPV vaccine missed opportunities was reduced from 45% to 19%. Specifically, reductions in missed opportunities fell from 9% to 0% during well-child visits, from 80% to 61% during acute visits, from 25% to 0% during follow-up visits, and from 11% to 0% during nurse-only visits. “We did see missed opportunities for acute visits – those who come in sick, but even these missed opportunities decreased over the 6-month study period,” Dr. Suryadevara said.

During follow-up teleconference calls, practice representatives reported positive experiences about the QI process and outcome improvements. “Once the practices were able to pull everyone on board and develop practice changes, I wasn’t surprised that the interventions worked,” she said. “They were able to develop systematic interventions, change the work flow in their practice, and get the results we anticipated.”

The study was funded by the AAP Hub and Spoke Initiative. Dr. Suryadevara reported having no financial disclosures.

[email protected]

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Teaching simple quality improvement principles to individual pediatric practices can improve adolescent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates, results from a multicenter study showed.

“We know that HPV vaccination rates are low, and there have been many efforts to improve the vaccination rates nationwide,” one of the study authors, Manika Suryadevara, MD, said in an interview at the Pediatric Academic Societies meeting. “One reason that vaccine rates are low in adolescents is missed opportunities. Adolescents don’t always show up for routine well-child visits where immunization records are reviewed, but they may show up with a cold, a sprained ankle, or a hospital follow-up. Providers do not routinely check immunizations at these visits, then don’t recommend vaccine to those who need it. These are the missed opportunities we need to act upon.”

Doug Brunk/MDedge News
Dr. Manika Suryadevara
Dr. Suryadevara, of the State University of New York Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, and her associates recruited five large pediatric practices from the New York American Academy of Pediatrics Chapter 1 to participate in a quality improvement (QI) project aimed at reducing missed vaccination opportunities in an effort to improve vaccine completion rates. The project began by having one clinical provider and one staff member from each practice attend an educational training session about QI principles and tools such as a value stream map, an impact matrix, and plan-do-study-act cycles. The training session also covered HPV epidemiology and associated cancers, vaccination rates, and recommended systematic changes to improve practice vaccination rates. Following the training session, representatives from each practice performed a monthly chart review of 10-20 consecutive patients aged 11-12 years seen in the office and collected data regarding patient gender and age, type of visit (well-child, acute, follow-up, nurse-only), if HPV vaccine was due or not, provider vaccine recommendation documentation, and vaccines administered, “so they can see where their missed opportunities were,” she said.

Data were entered into the AAP Quality Improvement Data Aggregator and run charts were printed. Next, each practice held monthly team meetings for 5 months to discuss chart review data, run chart results, and to determine intervention change for the next cycle. “Most of the interventions included standing orders, optimizing nurse’s visits, using electronic medical reminders to review immunization records, and having immunization records pulled for all adolescents who show up in their practice,” Dr. Suryadevara said. “The goal of these systematic changes is to make the work flow seamless.”

Analysis of run chart data revealed that over the five monthly cycles, the HPV vaccine completion rate improved from 45% to 65%, while the overall HPV vaccine missed opportunities was reduced from 45% to 19%. Specifically, reductions in missed opportunities fell from 9% to 0% during well-child visits, from 80% to 61% during acute visits, from 25% to 0% during follow-up visits, and from 11% to 0% during nurse-only visits. “We did see missed opportunities for acute visits – those who come in sick, but even these missed opportunities decreased over the 6-month study period,” Dr. Suryadevara said.

During follow-up teleconference calls, practice representatives reported positive experiences about the QI process and outcome improvements. “Once the practices were able to pull everyone on board and develop practice changes, I wasn’t surprised that the interventions worked,” she said. “They were able to develop systematic interventions, change the work flow in their practice, and get the results we anticipated.”

The study was funded by the AAP Hub and Spoke Initiative. Dr. Suryadevara reported having no financial disclosures.

[email protected]

 

 

– Teaching simple quality improvement principles to individual pediatric practices can improve adolescent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates, results from a multicenter study showed.

“We know that HPV vaccination rates are low, and there have been many efforts to improve the vaccination rates nationwide,” one of the study authors, Manika Suryadevara, MD, said in an interview at the Pediatric Academic Societies meeting. “One reason that vaccine rates are low in adolescents is missed opportunities. Adolescents don’t always show up for routine well-child visits where immunization records are reviewed, but they may show up with a cold, a sprained ankle, or a hospital follow-up. Providers do not routinely check immunizations at these visits, then don’t recommend vaccine to those who need it. These are the missed opportunities we need to act upon.”

Doug Brunk/MDedge News
Dr. Manika Suryadevara
Dr. Suryadevara, of the State University of New York Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, and her associates recruited five large pediatric practices from the New York American Academy of Pediatrics Chapter 1 to participate in a quality improvement (QI) project aimed at reducing missed vaccination opportunities in an effort to improve vaccine completion rates. The project began by having one clinical provider and one staff member from each practice attend an educational training session about QI principles and tools such as a value stream map, an impact matrix, and plan-do-study-act cycles. The training session also covered HPV epidemiology and associated cancers, vaccination rates, and recommended systematic changes to improve practice vaccination rates. Following the training session, representatives from each practice performed a monthly chart review of 10-20 consecutive patients aged 11-12 years seen in the office and collected data regarding patient gender and age, type of visit (well-child, acute, follow-up, nurse-only), if HPV vaccine was due or not, provider vaccine recommendation documentation, and vaccines administered, “so they can see where their missed opportunities were,” she said.

Data were entered into the AAP Quality Improvement Data Aggregator and run charts were printed. Next, each practice held monthly team meetings for 5 months to discuss chart review data, run chart results, and to determine intervention change for the next cycle. “Most of the interventions included standing orders, optimizing nurse’s visits, using electronic medical reminders to review immunization records, and having immunization records pulled for all adolescents who show up in their practice,” Dr. Suryadevara said. “The goal of these systematic changes is to make the work flow seamless.”

Analysis of run chart data revealed that over the five monthly cycles, the HPV vaccine completion rate improved from 45% to 65%, while the overall HPV vaccine missed opportunities was reduced from 45% to 19%. Specifically, reductions in missed opportunities fell from 9% to 0% during well-child visits, from 80% to 61% during acute visits, from 25% to 0% during follow-up visits, and from 11% to 0% during nurse-only visits. “We did see missed opportunities for acute visits – those who come in sick, but even these missed opportunities decreased over the 6-month study period,” Dr. Suryadevara said.

During follow-up teleconference calls, practice representatives reported positive experiences about the QI process and outcome improvements. “Once the practices were able to pull everyone on board and develop practice changes, I wasn’t surprised that the interventions worked,” she said. “They were able to develop systematic interventions, change the work flow in their practice, and get the results we anticipated.”

The study was funded by the AAP Hub and Spoke Initiative. Dr. Suryadevara reported having no financial disclosures.

[email protected]

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM PAS 2018

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Teaching quality improvement to pediatric practices can improve adolescent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine completion rates.

Major finding: Over five monthly cycles, run chart data revealed HPV vaccine complete rate increased from 45% to 65%.

Study details: A quality improvement project conducted at five large pediatric practices in New York state aimed at reducing missed vaccination opportunities in an effort to improve HPV vaccination completion rates.

Disclosures: The study was funded by the American Academy of Pediatrics Hub and Spoke Initiative. Dr. Suryadevara reported having no financial disclosures.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica