User login
EPA proposal on research data to be discussed at ATS meeting
A press conference on the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed policy on research data will be held at the American Thoracic Society International Conference on Sunday, May 20.
The conference, entitled “Silencing Science: EPA’s Proposed Policy on Research Data,” will occur at 11:15 a.m. Pacific Standard Time in the San Diego Convention Center, Meeting Room 23A (Upper Level).
For information about this press conference, contact Dacia Morris, director of communications and marketing of the ATS, at 212-315-8620.
A press conference on the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed policy on research data will be held at the American Thoracic Society International Conference on Sunday, May 20.
The conference, entitled “Silencing Science: EPA’s Proposed Policy on Research Data,” will occur at 11:15 a.m. Pacific Standard Time in the San Diego Convention Center, Meeting Room 23A (Upper Level).
For information about this press conference, contact Dacia Morris, director of communications and marketing of the ATS, at 212-315-8620.
A press conference on the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed policy on research data will be held at the American Thoracic Society International Conference on Sunday, May 20.
The conference, entitled “Silencing Science: EPA’s Proposed Policy on Research Data,” will occur at 11:15 a.m. Pacific Standard Time in the San Diego Convention Center, Meeting Room 23A (Upper Level).
For information about this press conference, contact Dacia Morris, director of communications and marketing of the ATS, at 212-315-8620.
FROM ATS 2018
VIDEO: Lyme disease spreading, but better testing may be coming
SANDESTIN, FLA. – Lyme disease is spreading in the United States, which makes it a high priority for rheumatologists, who will need to care for an increasing number of patients with posttreatment disorders affecting the joints, an expert said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.
Sheila Arvikar, MD, an instructor in the rheumatology division at Harvard Medical School, Boston, said that the disease – the most common vector-borne illness in the United States – is no longer strictly confined to the U.S. Northeast and the upper Midwest, according to reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Neighboring areas are increasingly affected, the reports have shown.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
That the disease may be spreading makes the need for awareness and better testing more acute, she said. Current testing is limited by a lack of sensitivity in early disease, and the standard two-tier combination of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot can be time consuming. But recent studies have found that whole cell sonicate ELISA combined with an ELISA for peptide C6 are equally or even more effective than the more cumbersome, two-tier version, Dr. Arvikar said.
A problem encountered by rheumatologists are patients who contracted Lyme disease but who continue to have joint pain and other symptoms despite treatment for the disease. This so-called posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS) can be similar to fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome, involving chronic symptoms but no chronic infection and no objective synovitis or inflammation.
There are no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatments for it, but options such as tricyclics, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, gabapentin, and pregabalin can be helpful, she said, along with exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapy. She also noted myriad alternative treatments marketed for PTLDS that have not been shown to be effective and can even be harmful, such as urine ingestion and treatment with bee venom.
“These patients are really desperate for anything to help with their symptoms, and there are lot of people out there who are preying on them with these therapies that aren’t really helpful. It’s important for us to be aware that these things are out there.”
Dr. Arvikar reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Arvikar S, CCR 2018.
SANDESTIN, FLA. – Lyme disease is spreading in the United States, which makes it a high priority for rheumatologists, who will need to care for an increasing number of patients with posttreatment disorders affecting the joints, an expert said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.
Sheila Arvikar, MD, an instructor in the rheumatology division at Harvard Medical School, Boston, said that the disease – the most common vector-borne illness in the United States – is no longer strictly confined to the U.S. Northeast and the upper Midwest, according to reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Neighboring areas are increasingly affected, the reports have shown.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
That the disease may be spreading makes the need for awareness and better testing more acute, she said. Current testing is limited by a lack of sensitivity in early disease, and the standard two-tier combination of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot can be time consuming. But recent studies have found that whole cell sonicate ELISA combined with an ELISA for peptide C6 are equally or even more effective than the more cumbersome, two-tier version, Dr. Arvikar said.
A problem encountered by rheumatologists are patients who contracted Lyme disease but who continue to have joint pain and other symptoms despite treatment for the disease. This so-called posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS) can be similar to fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome, involving chronic symptoms but no chronic infection and no objective synovitis or inflammation.
There are no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatments for it, but options such as tricyclics, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, gabapentin, and pregabalin can be helpful, she said, along with exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapy. She also noted myriad alternative treatments marketed for PTLDS that have not been shown to be effective and can even be harmful, such as urine ingestion and treatment with bee venom.
“These patients are really desperate for anything to help with their symptoms, and there are lot of people out there who are preying on them with these therapies that aren’t really helpful. It’s important for us to be aware that these things are out there.”
Dr. Arvikar reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Arvikar S, CCR 2018.
SANDESTIN, FLA. – Lyme disease is spreading in the United States, which makes it a high priority for rheumatologists, who will need to care for an increasing number of patients with posttreatment disorders affecting the joints, an expert said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.
Sheila Arvikar, MD, an instructor in the rheumatology division at Harvard Medical School, Boston, said that the disease – the most common vector-borne illness in the United States – is no longer strictly confined to the U.S. Northeast and the upper Midwest, according to reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Neighboring areas are increasingly affected, the reports have shown.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
That the disease may be spreading makes the need for awareness and better testing more acute, she said. Current testing is limited by a lack of sensitivity in early disease, and the standard two-tier combination of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot can be time consuming. But recent studies have found that whole cell sonicate ELISA combined with an ELISA for peptide C6 are equally or even more effective than the more cumbersome, two-tier version, Dr. Arvikar said.
A problem encountered by rheumatologists are patients who contracted Lyme disease but who continue to have joint pain and other symptoms despite treatment for the disease. This so-called posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS) can be similar to fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome, involving chronic symptoms but no chronic infection and no objective synovitis or inflammation.
There are no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatments for it, but options such as tricyclics, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, gabapentin, and pregabalin can be helpful, she said, along with exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapy. She also noted myriad alternative treatments marketed for PTLDS that have not been shown to be effective and can even be harmful, such as urine ingestion and treatment with bee venom.
“These patients are really desperate for anything to help with their symptoms, and there are lot of people out there who are preying on them with these therapies that aren’t really helpful. It’s important for us to be aware that these things are out there.”
Dr. Arvikar reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Arvikar S, CCR 2018.
EXPERT ANALYSIS AT CCR 18
Certolizumab pegol shows promise for nr-axSpA treatment
Certolizumab pegol was effective at treating nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis, the first drug to show positive results with the disease, according to topline data from a phase 3, placebo-controlled trial.
After 52 weeks, 47.2% of adult nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) patients within the C-AXSPAND trial who received certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) achieved at least a 2-point improvement on their Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, compared with 7.0% of nr-axSpA patients who received a placebo. In addition, patients who received certolizumab pegol also met the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria of 40% response after 12 weeks.
“People living with nr-axSpA frequently face delayed or incorrect diagnosis, and currently, in the U.S., there are no FDA-approved options to treat this condition. The C-AXSPAND study results provide important insights into the potential of Cimzia as an effective and durable treatment option for these patients,” Atul Deodhar, MD, professor of medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, and a lead investigator of the study, said in an announcement from certolizumab’s manufacturer, UCB.
Certolizumab pegol is currently indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe RA, active psoriatic arthritis, and active ankylosing spondylitis, as well as for the reduction of Crohn’s disease symptoms. The most common adverse events in RA, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis are upper respiratory tract infection, headache, hypertension, nasopharyngitis, back pain, pyrexia, pharyngitis, and rash.
Certolizumab pegol was effective at treating nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis, the first drug to show positive results with the disease, according to topline data from a phase 3, placebo-controlled trial.
After 52 weeks, 47.2% of adult nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) patients within the C-AXSPAND trial who received certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) achieved at least a 2-point improvement on their Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, compared with 7.0% of nr-axSpA patients who received a placebo. In addition, patients who received certolizumab pegol also met the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria of 40% response after 12 weeks.
“People living with nr-axSpA frequently face delayed or incorrect diagnosis, and currently, in the U.S., there are no FDA-approved options to treat this condition. The C-AXSPAND study results provide important insights into the potential of Cimzia as an effective and durable treatment option for these patients,” Atul Deodhar, MD, professor of medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, and a lead investigator of the study, said in an announcement from certolizumab’s manufacturer, UCB.
Certolizumab pegol is currently indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe RA, active psoriatic arthritis, and active ankylosing spondylitis, as well as for the reduction of Crohn’s disease symptoms. The most common adverse events in RA, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis are upper respiratory tract infection, headache, hypertension, nasopharyngitis, back pain, pyrexia, pharyngitis, and rash.
Certolizumab pegol was effective at treating nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis, the first drug to show positive results with the disease, according to topline data from a phase 3, placebo-controlled trial.
After 52 weeks, 47.2% of adult nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) patients within the C-AXSPAND trial who received certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) achieved at least a 2-point improvement on their Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, compared with 7.0% of nr-axSpA patients who received a placebo. In addition, patients who received certolizumab pegol also met the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria of 40% response after 12 weeks.
“People living with nr-axSpA frequently face delayed or incorrect diagnosis, and currently, in the U.S., there are no FDA-approved options to treat this condition. The C-AXSPAND study results provide important insights into the potential of Cimzia as an effective and durable treatment option for these patients,” Atul Deodhar, MD, professor of medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, and a lead investigator of the study, said in an announcement from certolizumab’s manufacturer, UCB.
Certolizumab pegol is currently indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe RA, active psoriatic arthritis, and active ankylosing spondylitis, as well as for the reduction of Crohn’s disease symptoms. The most common adverse events in RA, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis are upper respiratory tract infection, headache, hypertension, nasopharyngitis, back pain, pyrexia, pharyngitis, and rash.
Collagen drinks – do they really work?
The question is, do they really do anything? Previously, most collagen supplements in the beauty industry came in the form of a topical cream or an injectable, with collagen being the main filler of choice before hyaluronic acid fillers became available. Today, collagen supplementation in the form of oral pills and drinks is rampant. These drinks and “vitamins” are purported to improve skin and provide a more youthful appearance, both from an immediate and preventative standpoint. Some of the drinks come from companies in Japan and beyond. According to market forecasts, the collagen supplement industry is anticipated to be worth $6.63 billion by 2025, up from $3.71 billion in 2016. An email advertisement this month from NewBeauty magazine claims one brand of collagen supplementation “with grape seed extract [as] an effective collagen drink for the skin.” Each 1.7 oz. bottle contains 13,000 mg of marine hydrolyzed collagen with six antiaging ingredients that – the ad claims – will help visibly transform your skin to a fuller, firmer, younger look in as soon as 21 days.
Diet absolutely plays a role in our overall health and skin appearance. But can these concentrated collagen drinks provide an increased benefit?
We know from prior experience with injecting collagen in the lips – namely from bovine (such as Zyderm and Zyplast) or human-derived (such as Cosmoderm and CosmoPlast) sources – that it provided beautiful and often natural-appearing results, which, however, did not last. If longevity is an issue with collagen injections, assuming proper absorption from the gastrointestinal tract and subsequent integration into skin, how long should we expect the results from drinking collagen to last in skin, if any? If it does work and is something that improves skin when used on a continuous basis, is there an endpoint at which the benefit is maximized or where an excess of collagen could be detrimental?
Collagen disorders are those where there is inflammation or deficiency in collagen. Could supplementation improve these diseases? Or could supplementation exacerbate or bring on these disorders if consumed in excess? In collagen vascular diseases, such as scleroderma, where apparent autoimmune inflammation of collagen occurs, would supplementation exacerbate the disease by bringing about more collagen to attack, or would it improve the condition by providing new collagen where there may be a defect? Would it help in conditions of collagen deficiency, such as osteogenesis imperfecta?
Many questions about collagen drinks and supplementation remain to be answered. Photoprotection from an early age and a healthy diet that supports production of our bodies’ own natural collagen are the best measures for skin health. With the surplus of collagen drinks and supplements now on the market, objective studies should be conducted and are warranted to answer these question for ourselves and our patients.
Dr. Wesley and Dr. Talakoub are cocontributors to this column. Dr. Wesley practices dermatology in Beverly Hills, Calif. Dr. Talakoub is in private practice in McLean, Va. This month’s column is by Dr. Wesley. Write to them at [email protected]. They had no relevant disclosures.
The question is, do they really do anything? Previously, most collagen supplements in the beauty industry came in the form of a topical cream or an injectable, with collagen being the main filler of choice before hyaluronic acid fillers became available. Today, collagen supplementation in the form of oral pills and drinks is rampant. These drinks and “vitamins” are purported to improve skin and provide a more youthful appearance, both from an immediate and preventative standpoint. Some of the drinks come from companies in Japan and beyond. According to market forecasts, the collagen supplement industry is anticipated to be worth $6.63 billion by 2025, up from $3.71 billion in 2016. An email advertisement this month from NewBeauty magazine claims one brand of collagen supplementation “with grape seed extract [as] an effective collagen drink for the skin.” Each 1.7 oz. bottle contains 13,000 mg of marine hydrolyzed collagen with six antiaging ingredients that – the ad claims – will help visibly transform your skin to a fuller, firmer, younger look in as soon as 21 days.
Diet absolutely plays a role in our overall health and skin appearance. But can these concentrated collagen drinks provide an increased benefit?
We know from prior experience with injecting collagen in the lips – namely from bovine (such as Zyderm and Zyplast) or human-derived (such as Cosmoderm and CosmoPlast) sources – that it provided beautiful and often natural-appearing results, which, however, did not last. If longevity is an issue with collagen injections, assuming proper absorption from the gastrointestinal tract and subsequent integration into skin, how long should we expect the results from drinking collagen to last in skin, if any? If it does work and is something that improves skin when used on a continuous basis, is there an endpoint at which the benefit is maximized or where an excess of collagen could be detrimental?
Collagen disorders are those where there is inflammation or deficiency in collagen. Could supplementation improve these diseases? Or could supplementation exacerbate or bring on these disorders if consumed in excess? In collagen vascular diseases, such as scleroderma, where apparent autoimmune inflammation of collagen occurs, would supplementation exacerbate the disease by bringing about more collagen to attack, or would it improve the condition by providing new collagen where there may be a defect? Would it help in conditions of collagen deficiency, such as osteogenesis imperfecta?
Many questions about collagen drinks and supplementation remain to be answered. Photoprotection from an early age and a healthy diet that supports production of our bodies’ own natural collagen are the best measures for skin health. With the surplus of collagen drinks and supplements now on the market, objective studies should be conducted and are warranted to answer these question for ourselves and our patients.
Dr. Wesley and Dr. Talakoub are cocontributors to this column. Dr. Wesley practices dermatology in Beverly Hills, Calif. Dr. Talakoub is in private practice in McLean, Va. This month’s column is by Dr. Wesley. Write to them at [email protected]. They had no relevant disclosures.
The question is, do they really do anything? Previously, most collagen supplements in the beauty industry came in the form of a topical cream or an injectable, with collagen being the main filler of choice before hyaluronic acid fillers became available. Today, collagen supplementation in the form of oral pills and drinks is rampant. These drinks and “vitamins” are purported to improve skin and provide a more youthful appearance, both from an immediate and preventative standpoint. Some of the drinks come from companies in Japan and beyond. According to market forecasts, the collagen supplement industry is anticipated to be worth $6.63 billion by 2025, up from $3.71 billion in 2016. An email advertisement this month from NewBeauty magazine claims one brand of collagen supplementation “with grape seed extract [as] an effective collagen drink for the skin.” Each 1.7 oz. bottle contains 13,000 mg of marine hydrolyzed collagen with six antiaging ingredients that – the ad claims – will help visibly transform your skin to a fuller, firmer, younger look in as soon as 21 days.
Diet absolutely plays a role in our overall health and skin appearance. But can these concentrated collagen drinks provide an increased benefit?
We know from prior experience with injecting collagen in the lips – namely from bovine (such as Zyderm and Zyplast) or human-derived (such as Cosmoderm and CosmoPlast) sources – that it provided beautiful and often natural-appearing results, which, however, did not last. If longevity is an issue with collagen injections, assuming proper absorption from the gastrointestinal tract and subsequent integration into skin, how long should we expect the results from drinking collagen to last in skin, if any? If it does work and is something that improves skin when used on a continuous basis, is there an endpoint at which the benefit is maximized or where an excess of collagen could be detrimental?
Collagen disorders are those where there is inflammation or deficiency in collagen. Could supplementation improve these diseases? Or could supplementation exacerbate or bring on these disorders if consumed in excess? In collagen vascular diseases, such as scleroderma, where apparent autoimmune inflammation of collagen occurs, would supplementation exacerbate the disease by bringing about more collagen to attack, or would it improve the condition by providing new collagen where there may be a defect? Would it help in conditions of collagen deficiency, such as osteogenesis imperfecta?
Many questions about collagen drinks and supplementation remain to be answered. Photoprotection from an early age and a healthy diet that supports production of our bodies’ own natural collagen are the best measures for skin health. With the surplus of collagen drinks and supplements now on the market, objective studies should be conducted and are warranted to answer these question for ourselves and our patients.
Dr. Wesley and Dr. Talakoub are cocontributors to this column. Dr. Wesley practices dermatology in Beverly Hills, Calif. Dr. Talakoub is in private practice in McLean, Va. This month’s column is by Dr. Wesley. Write to them at [email protected]. They had no relevant disclosures.
CHEST® Physician’s preview of ATS 2018
Here is a glimpse of some of the important research that will be presented at this meeting.
The findings of several chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) drug trials will be discussed during a session entitled “ICS [Inhaled corticosteroids] in COPD: The Pendulum Keeps Swinging,” which is scheduled to occur at 9:15 a.m. in Room 14 A-B (Mezzanine Level). Among the research to be presented are the latest findings of the phase 3 IMPACT study of 10,355 symptomatic COPD patients with a history of moderate to severe exacerbations. This study compared the use of an inhaled therapy that comprised a corticosteroid, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), and a long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) with the use of two other therapy combinations – a corticosteroid and a LABA, or a LABA and a LAMA. (Lipson DA et al. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 18;378:1671-80). Patients were randomized to receive either a once-daily combination of 100 mcg fluticasone furoate (a corticosteroid); 62.5 mcg of the LAMA, umeclidinium; and 25 mcg of the LABA, vilanterol; or dual inhaled therapy involving either 100 mcg fluticasone furoate plus 25 mcg of vilanterol, or 62.5 mcg of umeclidinium plus 25 mcg of vilanterol for 52 weeks.
One of the updates on this trial is that using the triple therapy significantly reduced on-treatment all-cause mortality over using the LAMA (62.5 mcg of umeclidinium) plus LABA (25 mcg of the vilanterol) dual therapy. Fifty of the patients who received triple therapy died (1.20%), versus 49 patients in the corticosteroid plus LABA group (1.19%) and 30 patients (1.88%) in the LAMA plus LABA group. A 42.1% reduction in risk of all-cause mortality occurred for patients who took the triple therapy, when compared with patients who took the LAMA/LABA combo (95% confidence interval, 11.9%-61.9%; P = .011), according to an abstract on the ATS International Conference’s website.
At the same time on Sunday, researchers will be presenting their research in a session entitled “Sleep Disordered Breathing, Cardiovascular Disease, and Mortality,” in Room 3 (Upper Level) of the convention center. One of the abstracts that will be discussed compared the long-term effectiveness of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome with severe obstructive sleep apnea. In this multicenter open-label, randomized, controlled trial, Sanchez Quiroga M et al. analyzed the results for 202 patients who used one of the two treatments for at least 3 years. Among this study’s findings were that the mortality rates and the number of cardiovascular events that occurred were similar in the two treatment groups. The mortality rate for patients who used CPAP was 14.7%, compared with 11.3% for the patients who received NIV (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; P = .439), and the cardiovascular events per 100 person-years were 5.1 for CPAP and 7.46 for NIV (P = .315). The researchers concluded that both treatments are equally effective for the long term, but that CPAP should be “the preferred treatment modality,” because it’s cheaper and easier to implement.
On Monday morning, researchers will present their findings of the short-term cardiovascular effects of 30 pulmonary arterial hypertension patients’ use of the beta blocker carvedilol, in 3.125 mg doses taken twice a day. Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) decreased by an average of 11 mmHg (P = .003) in this double-blinded, randomized, controlled open-label trial with a 1-week run-in period. Cardiac output decreased by an average of –1.8 L/min (P less than .0001), but RVSP was inversely associated with cardiac output. “Short-term carvedilol could potentially identify a subgroup for long-term therapy based on initial drop in RVSP and heart rate response,” noted Farha SY et al. in their abstract. None of the patients experienced any side effects from taking the drug. More details on this research and other studies on pulmonary hypertension will be presented at 9:15 am in Area B (Hall A-B2, Ground level) of the convention center, in the session entitled “Surf’s Up: Riding the Wave of Clinical Research in Pulmonary Hypertension.”
Look for all of our on-site coverage of the conference at mdedge.com/chestphysician next week.
Here is a glimpse of some of the important research that will be presented at this meeting.
The findings of several chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) drug trials will be discussed during a session entitled “ICS [Inhaled corticosteroids] in COPD: The Pendulum Keeps Swinging,” which is scheduled to occur at 9:15 a.m. in Room 14 A-B (Mezzanine Level). Among the research to be presented are the latest findings of the phase 3 IMPACT study of 10,355 symptomatic COPD patients with a history of moderate to severe exacerbations. This study compared the use of an inhaled therapy that comprised a corticosteroid, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), and a long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) with the use of two other therapy combinations – a corticosteroid and a LABA, or a LABA and a LAMA. (Lipson DA et al. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 18;378:1671-80). Patients were randomized to receive either a once-daily combination of 100 mcg fluticasone furoate (a corticosteroid); 62.5 mcg of the LAMA, umeclidinium; and 25 mcg of the LABA, vilanterol; or dual inhaled therapy involving either 100 mcg fluticasone furoate plus 25 mcg of vilanterol, or 62.5 mcg of umeclidinium plus 25 mcg of vilanterol for 52 weeks.
One of the updates on this trial is that using the triple therapy significantly reduced on-treatment all-cause mortality over using the LAMA (62.5 mcg of umeclidinium) plus LABA (25 mcg of the vilanterol) dual therapy. Fifty of the patients who received triple therapy died (1.20%), versus 49 patients in the corticosteroid plus LABA group (1.19%) and 30 patients (1.88%) in the LAMA plus LABA group. A 42.1% reduction in risk of all-cause mortality occurred for patients who took the triple therapy, when compared with patients who took the LAMA/LABA combo (95% confidence interval, 11.9%-61.9%; P = .011), according to an abstract on the ATS International Conference’s website.
At the same time on Sunday, researchers will be presenting their research in a session entitled “Sleep Disordered Breathing, Cardiovascular Disease, and Mortality,” in Room 3 (Upper Level) of the convention center. One of the abstracts that will be discussed compared the long-term effectiveness of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome with severe obstructive sleep apnea. In this multicenter open-label, randomized, controlled trial, Sanchez Quiroga M et al. analyzed the results for 202 patients who used one of the two treatments for at least 3 years. Among this study’s findings were that the mortality rates and the number of cardiovascular events that occurred were similar in the two treatment groups. The mortality rate for patients who used CPAP was 14.7%, compared with 11.3% for the patients who received NIV (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; P = .439), and the cardiovascular events per 100 person-years were 5.1 for CPAP and 7.46 for NIV (P = .315). The researchers concluded that both treatments are equally effective for the long term, but that CPAP should be “the preferred treatment modality,” because it’s cheaper and easier to implement.
On Monday morning, researchers will present their findings of the short-term cardiovascular effects of 30 pulmonary arterial hypertension patients’ use of the beta blocker carvedilol, in 3.125 mg doses taken twice a day. Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) decreased by an average of 11 mmHg (P = .003) in this double-blinded, randomized, controlled open-label trial with a 1-week run-in period. Cardiac output decreased by an average of –1.8 L/min (P less than .0001), but RVSP was inversely associated with cardiac output. “Short-term carvedilol could potentially identify a subgroup for long-term therapy based on initial drop in RVSP and heart rate response,” noted Farha SY et al. in their abstract. None of the patients experienced any side effects from taking the drug. More details on this research and other studies on pulmonary hypertension will be presented at 9:15 am in Area B (Hall A-B2, Ground level) of the convention center, in the session entitled “Surf’s Up: Riding the Wave of Clinical Research in Pulmonary Hypertension.”
Look for all of our on-site coverage of the conference at mdedge.com/chestphysician next week.
Here is a glimpse of some of the important research that will be presented at this meeting.
The findings of several chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) drug trials will be discussed during a session entitled “ICS [Inhaled corticosteroids] in COPD: The Pendulum Keeps Swinging,” which is scheduled to occur at 9:15 a.m. in Room 14 A-B (Mezzanine Level). Among the research to be presented are the latest findings of the phase 3 IMPACT study of 10,355 symptomatic COPD patients with a history of moderate to severe exacerbations. This study compared the use of an inhaled therapy that comprised a corticosteroid, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), and a long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) with the use of two other therapy combinations – a corticosteroid and a LABA, or a LABA and a LAMA. (Lipson DA et al. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 18;378:1671-80). Patients were randomized to receive either a once-daily combination of 100 mcg fluticasone furoate (a corticosteroid); 62.5 mcg of the LAMA, umeclidinium; and 25 mcg of the LABA, vilanterol; or dual inhaled therapy involving either 100 mcg fluticasone furoate plus 25 mcg of vilanterol, or 62.5 mcg of umeclidinium plus 25 mcg of vilanterol for 52 weeks.
One of the updates on this trial is that using the triple therapy significantly reduced on-treatment all-cause mortality over using the LAMA (62.5 mcg of umeclidinium) plus LABA (25 mcg of the vilanterol) dual therapy. Fifty of the patients who received triple therapy died (1.20%), versus 49 patients in the corticosteroid plus LABA group (1.19%) and 30 patients (1.88%) in the LAMA plus LABA group. A 42.1% reduction in risk of all-cause mortality occurred for patients who took the triple therapy, when compared with patients who took the LAMA/LABA combo (95% confidence interval, 11.9%-61.9%; P = .011), according to an abstract on the ATS International Conference’s website.
At the same time on Sunday, researchers will be presenting their research in a session entitled “Sleep Disordered Breathing, Cardiovascular Disease, and Mortality,” in Room 3 (Upper Level) of the convention center. One of the abstracts that will be discussed compared the long-term effectiveness of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome with severe obstructive sleep apnea. In this multicenter open-label, randomized, controlled trial, Sanchez Quiroga M et al. analyzed the results for 202 patients who used one of the two treatments for at least 3 years. Among this study’s findings were that the mortality rates and the number of cardiovascular events that occurred were similar in the two treatment groups. The mortality rate for patients who used CPAP was 14.7%, compared with 11.3% for the patients who received NIV (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; P = .439), and the cardiovascular events per 100 person-years were 5.1 for CPAP and 7.46 for NIV (P = .315). The researchers concluded that both treatments are equally effective for the long term, but that CPAP should be “the preferred treatment modality,” because it’s cheaper and easier to implement.
On Monday morning, researchers will present their findings of the short-term cardiovascular effects of 30 pulmonary arterial hypertension patients’ use of the beta blocker carvedilol, in 3.125 mg doses taken twice a day. Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) decreased by an average of 11 mmHg (P = .003) in this double-blinded, randomized, controlled open-label trial with a 1-week run-in period. Cardiac output decreased by an average of –1.8 L/min (P less than .0001), but RVSP was inversely associated with cardiac output. “Short-term carvedilol could potentially identify a subgroup for long-term therapy based on initial drop in RVSP and heart rate response,” noted Farha SY et al. in their abstract. None of the patients experienced any side effects from taking the drug. More details on this research and other studies on pulmonary hypertension will be presented at 9:15 am in Area B (Hall A-B2, Ground level) of the convention center, in the session entitled “Surf’s Up: Riding the Wave of Clinical Research in Pulmonary Hypertension.”
Look for all of our on-site coverage of the conference at mdedge.com/chestphysician next week.
FROM ATS 2018
SCVD common in women with type 1 diabetes
BOSTON – Women with type 1 diabetes had a high prevalence of systemic collagen vascular diseases in a recent study, suggesting a global or progressive loss of immune tolerance, investigators reported at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.
“The median time of diagnosis for most of those autoimmune diseases was years after the diabetes diagnosis,” according to investigator Yicheng Bao, a medical student at University of Missouri-Kansas City.*
“I think there’s some loss of immune tolerance in these patients with type 1 diabetes that really deserves more study as these patients get older,” Mr. Bao said in a video interview.
The study from Mr. Bao and his colleagues was based on patient questionnaire responses and medical chart reviews for 1,167 adults with type 1 diabetes, including 628 women.
They found that SCVDs occurred in 9.2% of women, who had a significantly higher risk versus men (adjusted odds ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-3.34; P less than 0.0001).
Rheumatoid arthritis was the most commonly diagnosed SCVD, occurring in 4.3% of the women, followed by psoriasis at 2.6% and lupus at 1.8%. Others occurring in less than 1% of women included Sjögren’s, mixed connective tissue disease, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, juvenile RA, and scleroderma.
Older women were at higher risk of SCVD, with a mean age of 53.6 years versus 46.3 years for women with no SCVD (P = 0.006).
Looking at both men and women, investigators found that individuals with type 1 diabetes and an SCVD were more likely to have other autoimmune diseases, such as hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, and celiac disease (adjusted OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.71-4.60; P less than 0.0001).
Based on these findings, clinicians taking care of adults with type 1 diabetes need to be vigilant about checking for collagen vascular autoimmune diseases on review of systems, particularly in older women, Mr. Bao said.
“If the patient has a collagen vascular autoimmune disease with type 1 diabetes, they really need to be checking for these other autoimmune diseases,” he added.
Mr. Bao had no disclosures to report.
*This article was updated on May 18, 2018.
BOSTON – Women with type 1 diabetes had a high prevalence of systemic collagen vascular diseases in a recent study, suggesting a global or progressive loss of immune tolerance, investigators reported at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.
“The median time of diagnosis for most of those autoimmune diseases was years after the diabetes diagnosis,” according to investigator Yicheng Bao, a medical student at University of Missouri-Kansas City.*
“I think there’s some loss of immune tolerance in these patients with type 1 diabetes that really deserves more study as these patients get older,” Mr. Bao said in a video interview.
The study from Mr. Bao and his colleagues was based on patient questionnaire responses and medical chart reviews for 1,167 adults with type 1 diabetes, including 628 women.
They found that SCVDs occurred in 9.2% of women, who had a significantly higher risk versus men (adjusted odds ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-3.34; P less than 0.0001).
Rheumatoid arthritis was the most commonly diagnosed SCVD, occurring in 4.3% of the women, followed by psoriasis at 2.6% and lupus at 1.8%. Others occurring in less than 1% of women included Sjögren’s, mixed connective tissue disease, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, juvenile RA, and scleroderma.
Older women were at higher risk of SCVD, with a mean age of 53.6 years versus 46.3 years for women with no SCVD (P = 0.006).
Looking at both men and women, investigators found that individuals with type 1 diabetes and an SCVD were more likely to have other autoimmune diseases, such as hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, and celiac disease (adjusted OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.71-4.60; P less than 0.0001).
Based on these findings, clinicians taking care of adults with type 1 diabetes need to be vigilant about checking for collagen vascular autoimmune diseases on review of systems, particularly in older women, Mr. Bao said.
“If the patient has a collagen vascular autoimmune disease with type 1 diabetes, they really need to be checking for these other autoimmune diseases,” he added.
Mr. Bao had no disclosures to report.
*This article was updated on May 18, 2018.
BOSTON – Women with type 1 diabetes had a high prevalence of systemic collagen vascular diseases in a recent study, suggesting a global or progressive loss of immune tolerance, investigators reported at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.
“The median time of diagnosis for most of those autoimmune diseases was years after the diabetes diagnosis,” according to investigator Yicheng Bao, a medical student at University of Missouri-Kansas City.*
“I think there’s some loss of immune tolerance in these patients with type 1 diabetes that really deserves more study as these patients get older,” Mr. Bao said in a video interview.
The study from Mr. Bao and his colleagues was based on patient questionnaire responses and medical chart reviews for 1,167 adults with type 1 diabetes, including 628 women.
They found that SCVDs occurred in 9.2% of women, who had a significantly higher risk versus men (adjusted odds ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-3.34; P less than 0.0001).
Rheumatoid arthritis was the most commonly diagnosed SCVD, occurring in 4.3% of the women, followed by psoriasis at 2.6% and lupus at 1.8%. Others occurring in less than 1% of women included Sjögren’s, mixed connective tissue disease, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, juvenile RA, and scleroderma.
Older women were at higher risk of SCVD, with a mean age of 53.6 years versus 46.3 years for women with no SCVD (P = 0.006).
Looking at both men and women, investigators found that individuals with type 1 diabetes and an SCVD were more likely to have other autoimmune diseases, such as hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, and celiac disease (adjusted OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.71-4.60; P less than 0.0001).
Based on these findings, clinicians taking care of adults with type 1 diabetes need to be vigilant about checking for collagen vascular autoimmune diseases on review of systems, particularly in older women, Mr. Bao said.
“If the patient has a collagen vascular autoimmune disease with type 1 diabetes, they really need to be checking for these other autoimmune diseases,” he added.
Mr. Bao had no disclosures to report.
*This article was updated on May 18, 2018.
REPORTING FROM AACE 2018
Key clinical point: The high incidence of systemic collagen vascular diseases in women with type 1 diabetes suggests a potential progressive loss of immune tolerance.
Major finding: Systemic collagen vascular diseases occurred in 9.2% of women, who had a significantly higher risk versus men (adjusted odds ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-3.34; P less than 0.0001).
Study details: A nonrandomized study including retrospective chart review and responses to questionnaires for 1,212 individuals with type 1 diabetes.
Disclosures: Mr. Bao had no disclosures to report.
VIDEO: Dual studies seek answers in isolated skin vasculitis
SANDESTIN, FLA. – Patients with isolated skin vasculitis have always faced a frustrating clinical problem with no clear solution.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
ARAMIS (A Randomized Multicenter Study for Isolated Skin Vasculitis) and its linked genetic investigation, CUTIS (Clinical Transcriptomics in Systemic Vasculitis), may finally identify not only optimal treatments but also insight into the root causes and predictors of treatment response, Christian Pagnoux, MD, said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.
“Isolated skin vasculitis is a much-understudied disease, with only one clinical trial to guide our treatment,” said Dr. Pagnoux of the Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto. In 1995, a 3-month trial randomized 41 patients to skin emollients or to colchicine 0.5 mg/day. Colchicine wasn’t significantly better, but some who had attained remission on it relapsed after discontinuing the drug, which suggested there might be some benefit (Arch Dermatol. 1995;131[12]:1399-1402).
That hint of efficacy in just three patients 23 years ago forms the sole basis of the typical treatment for this disorder: colchicine, Dr. Pagnoux said. “We know that it doesn’t work, yet we continue to prescribe it. Patients deserve better.”
ARAMIS and CUTIS are the first attempts since then at solving this puzzle. ARAMIS is now recruiting about 90 patients in 10 North American medical centers. The three-armed crossover trial will randomize patients to colchicine 0.6 mg twice a day, dapsone 150 mg/day, or azathioprine 2 mg/kg per day for 6 months. Nonresponders can then be rerandomized to one of the other two study drugs for another 6 months. The primary endpoint is clinical response. Secondary endpoints include changes in physician and patient global assessment of response, Skindex29 score, health-related quality of life, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.
ARAMIS patients may also participate in CUTIS, the linked histopathologic and genetic investigation. More broad-ranging than ARAMIS, CUTIS is seeking 50 patients with several forms of idiopathic vasculitis, including cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, drug-induced vasculitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, IgA vasculitis, isolated cutaneous vasculitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, polyarteritis nodosa, and urticarial vasculitis.
The study will examine histopathologic and transcriptomic characteristics in punch biopsies of the lesions. “We very much hope that gene expression profiling on these lesions will help define novel pathways and help us to classify and target therapies,” Dr. Pagnoux said.
To learn more about these studies and refer patients into them, visit the Rare Disease Network pages for ARAMIS and CUTIS.
Dr. Pagnoux had no financial disclosures relevant to either study.
SOURCE: Pagnoux C. CCR 2018
SANDESTIN, FLA. – Patients with isolated skin vasculitis have always faced a frustrating clinical problem with no clear solution.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
ARAMIS (A Randomized Multicenter Study for Isolated Skin Vasculitis) and its linked genetic investigation, CUTIS (Clinical Transcriptomics in Systemic Vasculitis), may finally identify not only optimal treatments but also insight into the root causes and predictors of treatment response, Christian Pagnoux, MD, said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.
“Isolated skin vasculitis is a much-understudied disease, with only one clinical trial to guide our treatment,” said Dr. Pagnoux of the Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto. In 1995, a 3-month trial randomized 41 patients to skin emollients or to colchicine 0.5 mg/day. Colchicine wasn’t significantly better, but some who had attained remission on it relapsed after discontinuing the drug, which suggested there might be some benefit (Arch Dermatol. 1995;131[12]:1399-1402).
That hint of efficacy in just three patients 23 years ago forms the sole basis of the typical treatment for this disorder: colchicine, Dr. Pagnoux said. “We know that it doesn’t work, yet we continue to prescribe it. Patients deserve better.”
ARAMIS and CUTIS are the first attempts since then at solving this puzzle. ARAMIS is now recruiting about 90 patients in 10 North American medical centers. The three-armed crossover trial will randomize patients to colchicine 0.6 mg twice a day, dapsone 150 mg/day, or azathioprine 2 mg/kg per day for 6 months. Nonresponders can then be rerandomized to one of the other two study drugs for another 6 months. The primary endpoint is clinical response. Secondary endpoints include changes in physician and patient global assessment of response, Skindex29 score, health-related quality of life, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.
ARAMIS patients may also participate in CUTIS, the linked histopathologic and genetic investigation. More broad-ranging than ARAMIS, CUTIS is seeking 50 patients with several forms of idiopathic vasculitis, including cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, drug-induced vasculitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, IgA vasculitis, isolated cutaneous vasculitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, polyarteritis nodosa, and urticarial vasculitis.
The study will examine histopathologic and transcriptomic characteristics in punch biopsies of the lesions. “We very much hope that gene expression profiling on these lesions will help define novel pathways and help us to classify and target therapies,” Dr. Pagnoux said.
To learn more about these studies and refer patients into them, visit the Rare Disease Network pages for ARAMIS and CUTIS.
Dr. Pagnoux had no financial disclosures relevant to either study.
SOURCE: Pagnoux C. CCR 2018
SANDESTIN, FLA. – Patients with isolated skin vasculitis have always faced a frustrating clinical problem with no clear solution.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
ARAMIS (A Randomized Multicenter Study for Isolated Skin Vasculitis) and its linked genetic investigation, CUTIS (Clinical Transcriptomics in Systemic Vasculitis), may finally identify not only optimal treatments but also insight into the root causes and predictors of treatment response, Christian Pagnoux, MD, said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.
“Isolated skin vasculitis is a much-understudied disease, with only one clinical trial to guide our treatment,” said Dr. Pagnoux of the Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto. In 1995, a 3-month trial randomized 41 patients to skin emollients or to colchicine 0.5 mg/day. Colchicine wasn’t significantly better, but some who had attained remission on it relapsed after discontinuing the drug, which suggested there might be some benefit (Arch Dermatol. 1995;131[12]:1399-1402).
That hint of efficacy in just three patients 23 years ago forms the sole basis of the typical treatment for this disorder: colchicine, Dr. Pagnoux said. “We know that it doesn’t work, yet we continue to prescribe it. Patients deserve better.”
ARAMIS and CUTIS are the first attempts since then at solving this puzzle. ARAMIS is now recruiting about 90 patients in 10 North American medical centers. The three-armed crossover trial will randomize patients to colchicine 0.6 mg twice a day, dapsone 150 mg/day, or azathioprine 2 mg/kg per day for 6 months. Nonresponders can then be rerandomized to one of the other two study drugs for another 6 months. The primary endpoint is clinical response. Secondary endpoints include changes in physician and patient global assessment of response, Skindex29 score, health-related quality of life, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.
ARAMIS patients may also participate in CUTIS, the linked histopathologic and genetic investigation. More broad-ranging than ARAMIS, CUTIS is seeking 50 patients with several forms of idiopathic vasculitis, including cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, drug-induced vasculitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, IgA vasculitis, isolated cutaneous vasculitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, polyarteritis nodosa, and urticarial vasculitis.
The study will examine histopathologic and transcriptomic characteristics in punch biopsies of the lesions. “We very much hope that gene expression profiling on these lesions will help define novel pathways and help us to classify and target therapies,” Dr. Pagnoux said.
To learn more about these studies and refer patients into them, visit the Rare Disease Network pages for ARAMIS and CUTIS.
Dr. Pagnoux had no financial disclosures relevant to either study.
SOURCE: Pagnoux C. CCR 2018
REPORTING FROM CCR 18
VIDEO: Big Data, self-diagnosis to play role in future of RA, expert says
SANDESTIN, FLA. – Big data informing patient treatment, computer algorithms reading imaging instead of humans, and even accurate patient self-diagnosis could emerge over the next 10 years in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, an expert said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Gerd Burmester, MD, director of rheumatology and clinical immunology at Charité University in Berlin, trotted out staggering numbers on future medical data collection on patients. Data analytics companies project that more than 1,000 terabytes of data per lifetime is expected to be gathered, with just 10% expected to be clinical information and 30% in the form of “-omics,” such as proteomics and genomics, he said. The other 60% is expected to come from sensors and wearables that patients essentially collect themselves with their own devices, he said.
“We will have to use data in the interest of the patient,” he said. “This is the real secret. In order to do this, we need cognitive computing, which assesses structured and unstructured data and is self-learning.”
The days of images being read by human radiologists could be numbered, he said.
“There will be a revolution in imaging scoring,” he said, with computer algorithms generating scores, more quickly separating the normal scans from those that need clinical attention.
He described a possible scenario in which patients get genetic analyses, blood biomarker testing, and imaging performed at kiosks about town, producing a diagnosis without a single physician visit. It might seem fanciful, but when he asked the audience how many thought it was impossible over the next decade, no one raised a hand.
With advances such as the self-rheumatoid arthritis examination tool Rheuma-Check and the decline in cost for whole genome sequencing – along with wait times to see rheumatologists sometimes as long as 6 months – such a scenario might not be far fetched, Dr. Burmester said. It is possible, he said, because patient histories that used to sit in charts, images that used to be on film only, and genetic data that used to be unavailable, are all now in structured, digital form.
Referring to a recent commentary in the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Burmester said physicians have to accept the coming role of computer algorithms.
“If medicine wishes to stay in control of its own future,” he said, “physicians will not only have to embrace algorithms, they will also have to excel at developing and evaluating them, bringing machine-learning methods into the medical domain.”
SOURCE: Burmester, G. CCR 2018.
SANDESTIN, FLA. – Big data informing patient treatment, computer algorithms reading imaging instead of humans, and even accurate patient self-diagnosis could emerge over the next 10 years in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, an expert said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Gerd Burmester, MD, director of rheumatology and clinical immunology at Charité University in Berlin, trotted out staggering numbers on future medical data collection on patients. Data analytics companies project that more than 1,000 terabytes of data per lifetime is expected to be gathered, with just 10% expected to be clinical information and 30% in the form of “-omics,” such as proteomics and genomics, he said. The other 60% is expected to come from sensors and wearables that patients essentially collect themselves with their own devices, he said.
“We will have to use data in the interest of the patient,” he said. “This is the real secret. In order to do this, we need cognitive computing, which assesses structured and unstructured data and is self-learning.”
The days of images being read by human radiologists could be numbered, he said.
“There will be a revolution in imaging scoring,” he said, with computer algorithms generating scores, more quickly separating the normal scans from those that need clinical attention.
He described a possible scenario in which patients get genetic analyses, blood biomarker testing, and imaging performed at kiosks about town, producing a diagnosis without a single physician visit. It might seem fanciful, but when he asked the audience how many thought it was impossible over the next decade, no one raised a hand.
With advances such as the self-rheumatoid arthritis examination tool Rheuma-Check and the decline in cost for whole genome sequencing – along with wait times to see rheumatologists sometimes as long as 6 months – such a scenario might not be far fetched, Dr. Burmester said. It is possible, he said, because patient histories that used to sit in charts, images that used to be on film only, and genetic data that used to be unavailable, are all now in structured, digital form.
Referring to a recent commentary in the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Burmester said physicians have to accept the coming role of computer algorithms.
“If medicine wishes to stay in control of its own future,” he said, “physicians will not only have to embrace algorithms, they will also have to excel at developing and evaluating them, bringing machine-learning methods into the medical domain.”
SOURCE: Burmester, G. CCR 2018.
SANDESTIN, FLA. – Big data informing patient treatment, computer algorithms reading imaging instead of humans, and even accurate patient self-diagnosis could emerge over the next 10 years in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, an expert said at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Gerd Burmester, MD, director of rheumatology and clinical immunology at Charité University in Berlin, trotted out staggering numbers on future medical data collection on patients. Data analytics companies project that more than 1,000 terabytes of data per lifetime is expected to be gathered, with just 10% expected to be clinical information and 30% in the form of “-omics,” such as proteomics and genomics, he said. The other 60% is expected to come from sensors and wearables that patients essentially collect themselves with their own devices, he said.
“We will have to use data in the interest of the patient,” he said. “This is the real secret. In order to do this, we need cognitive computing, which assesses structured and unstructured data and is self-learning.”
The days of images being read by human radiologists could be numbered, he said.
“There will be a revolution in imaging scoring,” he said, with computer algorithms generating scores, more quickly separating the normal scans from those that need clinical attention.
He described a possible scenario in which patients get genetic analyses, blood biomarker testing, and imaging performed at kiosks about town, producing a diagnosis without a single physician visit. It might seem fanciful, but when he asked the audience how many thought it was impossible over the next decade, no one raised a hand.
With advances such as the self-rheumatoid arthritis examination tool Rheuma-Check and the decline in cost for whole genome sequencing – along with wait times to see rheumatologists sometimes as long as 6 months – such a scenario might not be far fetched, Dr. Burmester said. It is possible, he said, because patient histories that used to sit in charts, images that used to be on film only, and genetic data that used to be unavailable, are all now in structured, digital form.
Referring to a recent commentary in the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Burmester said physicians have to accept the coming role of computer algorithms.
“If medicine wishes to stay in control of its own future,” he said, “physicians will not only have to embrace algorithms, they will also have to excel at developing and evaluating them, bringing machine-learning methods into the medical domain.”
SOURCE: Burmester, G. CCR 2018.
EXPERT ANALYSIS AT CCR 18
MDedge Daily News: Heart rate variability a risk factor for depression?
Also, results of the SYGMA1 and SYGMA1 trials show that as-needed budesonide-formoterol prevented exacerbations in mild asthma, patients with Parkinson’s disease may have impaired insulin secretion, and FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb floats ideas on Medicare drug coverage. Listen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.
Also, results of the SYGMA1 and SYGMA1 trials show that as-needed budesonide-formoterol prevented exacerbations in mild asthma, patients with Parkinson’s disease may have impaired insulin secretion, and FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb floats ideas on Medicare drug coverage. Listen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.
Also, results of the SYGMA1 and SYGMA1 trials show that as-needed budesonide-formoterol prevented exacerbations in mild asthma, patients with Parkinson’s disease may have impaired insulin secretion, and FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb floats ideas on Medicare drug coverage. Listen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.
Better matching for blood transfusions
Researchers have developed software that could enable more precise matching for blood transfusions, according to a paper published in The Lancet Haematology.
The software, bloodTyper, can automatically type red blood cell (RBC) and platelet antigens from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data.
In repeated tests, bloodTyper produced results that were more than 99% concordant with results from conventional antigen typing methods.
The researchers said these results suggest bloodTyper could improve transfusion typing.
“[W]ith current technology, it is not cost-effective to do blood typing for all antigens,” said study author William Lane, MD, PhD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts.
“But the algorithm we have developed can be applied to type everyone for all relevant blood groups at a low cost once sequencing is obtained.”
Dr Lane and his colleagues first tested bloodTyper using data from the MedSeq Project—the first randomized trial of WGS in healthy adults.
Blood samples from 110 subjects underwent DNA isolation, WGS, and RBC and platelet antigen typing with bloodTyper. Samples also underwent single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array typing and serological typing.
The researchers compared results with these typing methods and found that bloodTyper was 99.5% concordant with serological and SNP typing across the first 20 MedSeq genomes.
Further refinement of bloodTyper enabled improved concordance for the remaining 90 genomes. The researchers said bloodTyper was 99.8% concordant with serological and SNP typing methods for 38 RBC and 22 platelet antigens (encoded by 17 RBC and 6 platelet genes).
The team made additional modifications to bloodTyper and tested it with 200 genomes from the INTERVAL study. This time, bloodTyper was 99.2% concordant with serological methods for typing of 21 RBC antigens encoded by 14 genes.
When the researchers adjusted for the lower depth of coverage for INTERVAL genomes compared to MedSeq genomes (15× and 30×, respectively), they observed 99.9% concordance between serological typing and bloodTyper.
“This approach has the potential to be one of the first routine clinical uses of genomics for medical care for patients needing blood transfusion,” said study author Connie M. Westhoff, PhD, of the New York Blood Center in New York, New York.
“It could prevent serious or even fatal complications because, once patients are sensitized, they have a life-long risk of hemolytic transfusion reactions if blood transfusion is needed in an emergency.”
Researchers have developed software that could enable more precise matching for blood transfusions, according to a paper published in The Lancet Haematology.
The software, bloodTyper, can automatically type red blood cell (RBC) and platelet antigens from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data.
In repeated tests, bloodTyper produced results that were more than 99% concordant with results from conventional antigen typing methods.
The researchers said these results suggest bloodTyper could improve transfusion typing.
“[W]ith current technology, it is not cost-effective to do blood typing for all antigens,” said study author William Lane, MD, PhD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts.
“But the algorithm we have developed can be applied to type everyone for all relevant blood groups at a low cost once sequencing is obtained.”
Dr Lane and his colleagues first tested bloodTyper using data from the MedSeq Project—the first randomized trial of WGS in healthy adults.
Blood samples from 110 subjects underwent DNA isolation, WGS, and RBC and platelet antigen typing with bloodTyper. Samples also underwent single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array typing and serological typing.
The researchers compared results with these typing methods and found that bloodTyper was 99.5% concordant with serological and SNP typing across the first 20 MedSeq genomes.
Further refinement of bloodTyper enabled improved concordance for the remaining 90 genomes. The researchers said bloodTyper was 99.8% concordant with serological and SNP typing methods for 38 RBC and 22 platelet antigens (encoded by 17 RBC and 6 platelet genes).
The team made additional modifications to bloodTyper and tested it with 200 genomes from the INTERVAL study. This time, bloodTyper was 99.2% concordant with serological methods for typing of 21 RBC antigens encoded by 14 genes.
When the researchers adjusted for the lower depth of coverage for INTERVAL genomes compared to MedSeq genomes (15× and 30×, respectively), they observed 99.9% concordance between serological typing and bloodTyper.
“This approach has the potential to be one of the first routine clinical uses of genomics for medical care for patients needing blood transfusion,” said study author Connie M. Westhoff, PhD, of the New York Blood Center in New York, New York.
“It could prevent serious or even fatal complications because, once patients are sensitized, they have a life-long risk of hemolytic transfusion reactions if blood transfusion is needed in an emergency.”
Researchers have developed software that could enable more precise matching for blood transfusions, according to a paper published in The Lancet Haematology.
The software, bloodTyper, can automatically type red blood cell (RBC) and platelet antigens from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data.
In repeated tests, bloodTyper produced results that were more than 99% concordant with results from conventional antigen typing methods.
The researchers said these results suggest bloodTyper could improve transfusion typing.
“[W]ith current technology, it is not cost-effective to do blood typing for all antigens,” said study author William Lane, MD, PhD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts.
“But the algorithm we have developed can be applied to type everyone for all relevant blood groups at a low cost once sequencing is obtained.”
Dr Lane and his colleagues first tested bloodTyper using data from the MedSeq Project—the first randomized trial of WGS in healthy adults.
Blood samples from 110 subjects underwent DNA isolation, WGS, and RBC and platelet antigen typing with bloodTyper. Samples also underwent single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array typing and serological typing.
The researchers compared results with these typing methods and found that bloodTyper was 99.5% concordant with serological and SNP typing across the first 20 MedSeq genomes.
Further refinement of bloodTyper enabled improved concordance for the remaining 90 genomes. The researchers said bloodTyper was 99.8% concordant with serological and SNP typing methods for 38 RBC and 22 platelet antigens (encoded by 17 RBC and 6 platelet genes).
The team made additional modifications to bloodTyper and tested it with 200 genomes from the INTERVAL study. This time, bloodTyper was 99.2% concordant with serological methods for typing of 21 RBC antigens encoded by 14 genes.
When the researchers adjusted for the lower depth of coverage for INTERVAL genomes compared to MedSeq genomes (15× and 30×, respectively), they observed 99.9% concordance between serological typing and bloodTyper.
“This approach has the potential to be one of the first routine clinical uses of genomics for medical care for patients needing blood transfusion,” said study author Connie M. Westhoff, PhD, of the New York Blood Center in New York, New York.
“It could prevent serious or even fatal complications because, once patients are sensitized, they have a life-long risk of hemolytic transfusion reactions if blood transfusion is needed in an emergency.”