NEW YORK – For elderly individuals with depression exacerbated by physical limitations and personal losses, cognitive-behavioral therapy is a powerful tool for improving quality of life, according to the faculty of a workshop on this topic at the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association.

“The focus is on coping skills. It is about how to persevere in the face of adversity,” explained David A. Casey, MD, professor and chair of the department of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at University of Louisville (Ky.).

Ted Bosworth/MDedge News

“Some patients are essentially immobilized by their withdrawal and convinced that their problems are unsolvable, but most will improve their quality of life through CBT,” he maintained.

There are data to support this contention, according to Jesse H. Wright III, MD, PhD, director of the Depression Center at the University of Louisville. He cited controlled studies demonstrating the efficacy of CBT relative to no CBT in relieving depression in the elderly.

“The evidence suggests that combining CBT with pharmacotherapy is better than either alone for managing depression in this age group,” Dr. Wright said.

In developing a therapeutic plan through CBT, patients are given assignments designed to develop participation in meaningful activities. These must be realistic within physical limitations and within the patient’s readiness to engage. Small steps toward a goal might be needed. At each therapeutic encounter, goals are set, and progress should be evaluated at the subsequent therapeutic encounter.

“A written plan is necessary. If you do not write it down, it probably will not happen,” Dr. Casey cautioned. He said a rehearsal of the actions needed to achieve the assigned goals might be helpful before the patient leaves the treatment session. This allows the clinician to recognize and address potential obstacles, including practical issues, such as mobility, or psychological issues, such as fear of physical activities.

Developing persistence in the face of high levels of negativity can be a challenge not only for the patient but also for the physician. According to Dr. Casey, maintaining a positive attitude can be challenging after treating a series of highly withdrawn and discouraged patients. But he emphasized the need for a professional orientation, recognizing that incremental gains in patient well-being, not cure, should be considered a reasonable goal.

“If I can improve the patient’s quality of life, this is a significant success,” he said. He believes it is sometimes necessary to distract patients from potential problems to focus on expected benefits.

“Patients can have a view of their limitations that is accurate but unhelpful,” Dr. Casey said. The goal of CBT is to move the focus to strategies that can restore lost interest and pleasure in daily life.

Dr. Casey and Dr. Wright reported no potential conflicts of interest related to this topic.

NEW YORK – For elderly individuals with depression exacerbated by physical limitations and personal losses, cognitive-behavioral therapy is a powerful tool for improving quality of life, according to the faculty of a workshop on this topic at the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association.

“The focus is on coping skills. It is about how to persevere in the face of adversity,” explained David A. Casey, MD, professor and chair of the department of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at University of Louisville (Ky.).

Ted Bosworth/MDedge News

“Some patients are essentially immobilized by their withdrawal and convinced that their problems are unsolvable, but most will improve their quality of life through CBT,” he maintained.

There are data to support this contention, according to Jesse H. Wright III, MD, PhD, director of the Depression Center at the University of Louisville. He cited controlled studies demonstrating the efficacy of CBT relative to no CBT in relieving depression in the elderly.

“The evidence suggests that combining CBT with pharmacotherapy is better than either alone for managing depression in this age group,” Dr. Wright said.

In developing a therapeutic plan through CBT, patients are given assignments designed to develop participation in meaningful activities. These must be realistic within physical limitations and within the patient’s readiness to engage. Small steps toward a goal might be needed. At each therapeutic encounter, goals are set, and progress should be evaluated at the subsequent therapeutic encounter.

“A written plan is necessary. If you do not write it down, it probably will not happen,” Dr. Casey cautioned. He said a rehearsal of the actions needed to achieve the assigned goals might be helpful before the patient leaves the treatment session. This allows the clinician to recognize and address potential obstacles, including practical issues, such as mobility, or psychological issues, such as fear of physical activities.

Developing persistence in the face of high levels of negativity can be a challenge not only for the patient but also for the physician. According to Dr. Casey, maintaining a positive attitude can be challenging after treating a series of highly withdrawn and discouraged patients. But he emphasized the need for a professional orientation, recognizing that incremental gains in patient well-being, not cure, should be considered a reasonable goal.

“If I can improve the patient’s quality of life, this is a significant success,” he said. He believes it is sometimes necessary to distract patients from potential problems to focus on expected benefits.

“Patients can have a view of their limitations that is accurate but unhelpful,” Dr. Casey said. The goal of CBT is to move the focus to strategies that can restore lost interest and pleasure in daily life.

Dr. Casey and Dr. Wright reported no potential conflicts of interest related to this topic.

NEW YORK – For elderly individuals with depression exacerbated by physical limitations and personal losses, cognitive-behavioral therapy is a powerful tool for improving quality of life, according to the faculty of a workshop on this topic at the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association.

“The focus is on coping skills. It is about how to persevere in the face of adversity,” explained David A. Casey, MD, professor and chair of the department of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at University of Louisville (Ky.).

Ted Bosworth/MDedge News

“Some patients are essentially immobilized by their withdrawal and convinced that their problems are unsolvable, but most will improve their quality of life through CBT,” he maintained.

There are data to support this contention, according to Jesse H. Wright III, MD, PhD, director of the Depression Center at the University of Louisville. He cited controlled studies demonstrating the efficacy of CBT relative to no CBT in relieving depression in the elderly.

“The evidence suggests that combining CBT with pharmacotherapy is better than either alone for managing depression in this age group,” Dr. Wright said.

In developing a therapeutic plan through CBT, patients are given assignments designed to develop participation in meaningful activities. These must be realistic within physical limitations and within the patient’s readiness to engage. Small steps toward a goal might be needed. At each therapeutic encounter, goals are set, and progress should be evaluated at the subsequent therapeutic encounter.

“A written plan is necessary. If you do not write it down, it probably will not happen,” Dr. Casey cautioned. He said a rehearsal of the actions needed to achieve the assigned goals might be helpful before the patient leaves the treatment session. This allows the clinician to recognize and address potential obstacles, including practical issues, such as mobility, or psychological issues, such as fear of physical activities.

Developing persistence in the face of high levels of negativity can be a challenge not only for the patient but also for the physician. According to Dr. Casey, maintaining a positive attitude can be challenging after treating a series of highly withdrawn and discouraged patients. But he emphasized the need for a professional orientation, recognizing that incremental gains in patient well-being, not cure, should be considered a reasonable goal.

“If I can improve the patient’s quality of life, this is a significant success,” he said. He believes it is sometimes necessary to distract patients from potential problems to focus on expected benefits.

“Patients can have a view of their limitations that is accurate but unhelpful,” Dr. Casey said. The goal of CBT is to move the focus to strategies that can restore lost interest and pleasure in daily life.

Dr. Casey and Dr. Wright reported no potential conflicts of interest related to this topic.

Poor sleep is associated with increased suicidal behaviors in college students – even when controlling for depression, a study of 1,700 students shows.

“Furthermore, findings suggest that some specific sleep components – shorter sleep duration, more frequent bad dreams, feeling too cold while sleeping, and greater sleep medication use – are particularly associated with increased suicidal behaviors in college students,” reported Stephen P. Becker, PhD, of the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Center, and his associates.

The researchers recruited students from two universities. Most of the students (65%) were female, white (82%), and in their first year of college (63%). The participants’ sleep was assessed using the nine-item Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), their depressive symptoms were assessed using the Depressive Anxiety Stress Scales-21, and their suicidal behavior was assessed using the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R), which is a four-item, self-report measure.

About two-thirds of the students (64%) were found to have sleep problems (total PSQI score greater than 5), and 24% were found to have suicide risk (total SBQ-R score of at least 7). Of the students who were found to have suicide risk, 83% also had sleep problems.

Using regression analysis, Dr. Becker and his associates found that the odds of being classified with suicide risk were 6.5 times greater for students with depression and 2.7 times greater for those with sleep problems.

The results add to the literature suggesting that sleep would be an “important component to include in screening and intervention efforts to prevent suicidal ideation and attempts on college campuses,” the researchers wrote.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Becker SP et al. J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Apr;99:123-8.

Poor sleep is associated with increased suicidal behaviors in college students – even when controlling for depression, a study of 1,700 students shows.

“Furthermore, findings suggest that some specific sleep components – shorter sleep duration, more frequent bad dreams, feeling too cold while sleeping, and greater sleep medication use – are particularly associated with increased suicidal behaviors in college students,” reported Stephen P. Becker, PhD, of the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Center, and his associates.

The researchers recruited students from two universities. Most of the students (65%) were female, white (82%), and in their first year of college (63%). The participants’ sleep was assessed using the nine-item Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), their depressive symptoms were assessed using the Depressive Anxiety Stress Scales-21, and their suicidal behavior was assessed using the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R), which is a four-item, self-report measure.

About two-thirds of the students (64%) were found to have sleep problems (total PSQI score greater than 5), and 24% were found to have suicide risk (total SBQ-R score of at least 7). Of the students who were found to have suicide risk, 83% also had sleep problems.

Using regression analysis, Dr. Becker and his associates found that the odds of being classified with suicide risk were 6.5 times greater for students with depression and 2.7 times greater for those with sleep problems.

The results add to the literature suggesting that sleep would be an “important component to include in screening and intervention efforts to prevent suicidal ideation and attempts on college campuses,” the researchers wrote.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Becker SP et al. J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Apr;99:123-8.

Poor sleep is associated with increased suicidal behaviors in college students – even when controlling for depression, a study of 1,700 students shows.

“Furthermore, findings suggest that some specific sleep components – shorter sleep duration, more frequent bad dreams, feeling too cold while sleeping, and greater sleep medication use – are particularly associated with increased suicidal behaviors in college students,” reported Stephen P. Becker, PhD, of the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Center, and his associates.

The researchers recruited students from two universities. Most of the students (65%) were female, white (82%), and in their first year of college (63%). The participants’ sleep was assessed using the nine-item Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), their depressive symptoms were assessed using the Depressive Anxiety Stress Scales-21, and their suicidal behavior was assessed using the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R), which is a four-item, self-report measure.

About two-thirds of the students (64%) were found to have sleep problems (total PSQI score greater than 5), and 24% were found to have suicide risk (total SBQ-R score of at least 7). Of the students who were found to have suicide risk, 83% also had sleep problems.

Using regression analysis, Dr. Becker and his associates found that the odds of being classified with suicide risk were 6.5 times greater for students with depression and 2.7 times greater for those with sleep problems.

The results add to the literature suggesting that sleep would be an “important component to include in screening and intervention efforts to prevent suicidal ideation and attempts on college campuses,” the researchers wrote.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Becker SP et al. J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Apr;99:123-8.

AUSTIN, TEX. – A new treatment for endometriosis-related pain, Elagolix, showed evidence of being effective long term, according to a study presented at the annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Elagolix, an oral nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, manufactured by AbbVie, would be the first treatment of its kind if approved by the Food and Drug Administration, and would fulfill a needed relief for a more tolerable approach to severe endometriosis patients, according to presenter Eric S. Surrey, MD, medical director at the Colorado Center of Reproductive Medicine, Lone Tree.

“There have been no new medications approved for a long time for systematic endometriosis and there is a huge gap because the current options are expensive, and they are often injectable drugs,” said Dr. Surrey in an interview. “This would be an oral agent, which would be fabulous because it allows for a lot of flexibility and for many patients this could be much less concerning than using something long acting.”

To test the long-term effects of Elagolix, investigators studied 570 women with moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain who had gathered to participate in a previous phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial concerning the drug’s effectiveness.

In the two extension studies, all participants were given either a 150- or 200-mg dose of Elagolix.

Average age of each patient group was between 31 and 34 years, and all groups were majority white, with a mean length of time from surgical diagnosis ranging from 45.5 to 56.6 months.

Patient improvements in dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain continued between the first 6 months and 12 months of treatment, with a decrease of 46%-77% in the overall number of analgesics taken per day.

After 12 months of consecutive treatment, patients given 150 mg of Elagolix saw mean dysmenorrhea scores improve by 49%-53% from baseline, and by 82% for those at 200 mg, with certain expected adverse events, according to Dr. Surrey.

One of the most common adverse events associated with Elagolix was hot flashes, an unsurprising finding for Dr. Surrey and his colleagues considering Elagolix is a drug that lowers estrogen levels. However, any hot flashes patients experienced during the trial were still better than those associated with current medications, according to Dr. Surrey.

“In this extension study nobody dropped out because of hot flashes in the additional 6-month extension time,” Dr. Surrey explained. “If you look at the gold standard drug for endometriosis now, which is a GnRH agonist, which are highly available and are either injectable or implants, [patients taking these drugs] can have very severe hot flashes that require additional medication to alleviate the hot flashes at the same time.”

Patients did also experience some loss in bone density; however, Dr. Surrey argues the frequency and level of these adverse events is still better than current treatment options. One patient was required to discontinue the trial for bone density loss.

Currently, Elagolix is under FDA priority review, and if approved will be the first oral endometriosis treatment approved in over a decade, according to Dr. Surrey.

Dr. Surrey and several coauthors receive financial support from AbbVie as consultants, board members, and/or employees. Dr. Surrey and Dr. Taylor receive additional support from companies including Pfizer, Bayer, and Obseva.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Surrey ES et al. ACOG 2018, Abstract 11OP.

AUSTIN, TEX. – A new treatment for endometriosis-related pain, Elagolix, showed evidence of being effective long term, according to a study presented at the annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Elagolix, an oral nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, manufactured by AbbVie, would be the first treatment of its kind if approved by the Food and Drug Administration, and would fulfill a needed relief for a more tolerable approach to severe endometriosis patients, according to presenter Eric S. Surrey, MD, medical director at the Colorado Center of Reproductive Medicine, Lone Tree.

“There have been no new medications approved for a long time for systematic endometriosis and there is a huge gap because the current options are expensive, and they are often injectable drugs,” said Dr. Surrey in an interview. “This would be an oral agent, which would be fabulous because it allows for a lot of flexibility and for many patients this could be much less concerning than using something long acting.”

To test the long-term effects of Elagolix, investigators studied 570 women with moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain who had gathered to participate in a previous phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial concerning the drug’s effectiveness.

In the two extension studies, all participants were given either a 150- or 200-mg dose of Elagolix.

Average age of each patient group was between 31 and 34 years, and all groups were majority white, with a mean length of time from surgical diagnosis ranging from 45.5 to 56.6 months.

Patient improvements in dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain continued between the first 6 months and 12 months of treatment, with a decrease of 46%-77% in the overall number of analgesics taken per day.

After 12 months of consecutive treatment, patients given 150 mg of Elagolix saw mean dysmenorrhea scores improve by 49%-53% from baseline, and by 82% for those at 200 mg, with certain expected adverse events, according to Dr. Surrey.

One of the most common adverse events associated with Elagolix was hot flashes, an unsurprising finding for Dr. Surrey and his colleagues considering Elagolix is a drug that lowers estrogen levels. However, any hot flashes patients experienced during the trial were still better than those associated with current medications, according to Dr. Surrey.

“In this extension study nobody dropped out because of hot flashes in the additional 6-month extension time,” Dr. Surrey explained. “If you look at the gold standard drug for endometriosis now, which is a GnRH agonist, which are highly available and are either injectable or implants, [patients taking these drugs] can have very severe hot flashes that require additional medication to alleviate the hot flashes at the same time.”

Patients did also experience some loss in bone density; however, Dr. Surrey argues the frequency and level of these adverse events is still better than current treatment options. One patient was required to discontinue the trial for bone density loss.

Currently, Elagolix is under FDA priority review, and if approved will be the first oral endometriosis treatment approved in over a decade, according to Dr. Surrey.

Dr. Surrey and several coauthors receive financial support from AbbVie as consultants, board members, and/or employees. Dr. Surrey and Dr. Taylor receive additional support from companies including Pfizer, Bayer, and Obseva.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Surrey ES et al. ACOG 2018, Abstract 11OP.

AUSTIN, TEX. – A new treatment for endometriosis-related pain, Elagolix, showed evidence of being effective long term, according to a study presented at the annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Elagolix, an oral nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, manufactured by AbbVie, would be the first treatment of its kind if approved by the Food and Drug Administration, and would fulfill a needed relief for a more tolerable approach to severe endometriosis patients, according to presenter Eric S. Surrey, MD, medical director at the Colorado Center of Reproductive Medicine, Lone Tree.

“There have been no new medications approved for a long time for systematic endometriosis and there is a huge gap because the current options are expensive, and they are often injectable drugs,” said Dr. Surrey in an interview. “This would be an oral agent, which would be fabulous because it allows for a lot of flexibility and for many patients this could be much less concerning than using something long acting.”

To test the long-term effects of Elagolix, investigators studied 570 women with moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain who had gathered to participate in a previous phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial concerning the drug’s effectiveness.

In the two extension studies, all participants were given either a 150- or 200-mg dose of Elagolix.

Average age of each patient group was between 31 and 34 years, and all groups were majority white, with a mean length of time from surgical diagnosis ranging from 45.5 to 56.6 months.

Patient improvements in dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain continued between the first 6 months and 12 months of treatment, with a decrease of 46%-77% in the overall number of analgesics taken per day.

After 12 months of consecutive treatment, patients given 150 mg of Elagolix saw mean dysmenorrhea scores improve by 49%-53% from baseline, and by 82% for those at 200 mg, with certain expected adverse events, according to Dr. Surrey.

One of the most common adverse events associated with Elagolix was hot flashes, an unsurprising finding for Dr. Surrey and his colleagues considering Elagolix is a drug that lowers estrogen levels. However, any hot flashes patients experienced during the trial were still better than those associated with current medications, according to Dr. Surrey.

“In this extension study nobody dropped out because of hot flashes in the additional 6-month extension time,” Dr. Surrey explained. “If you look at the gold standard drug for endometriosis now, which is a GnRH agonist, which are highly available and are either injectable or implants, [patients taking these drugs] can have very severe hot flashes that require additional medication to alleviate the hot flashes at the same time.”

Patients did also experience some loss in bone density; however, Dr. Surrey argues the frequency and level of these adverse events is still better than current treatment options. One patient was required to discontinue the trial for bone density loss.

Currently, Elagolix is under FDA priority review, and if approved will be the first oral endometriosis treatment approved in over a decade, according to Dr. Surrey.

Dr. Surrey and several coauthors receive financial support from AbbVie as consultants, board members, and/or employees. Dr. Surrey and Dr. Taylor receive additional support from companies including Pfizer, Bayer, and Obseva.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Surrey ES et al. ACOG 2018, Abstract 11OP.

TORONTO – Among infants up to 60 days old with an invasive bacterial infection, adverse outcomes are associated with prematurity, ill appearance, and bacterial meningitis, a multicenter retrospective analysis found.

“Young infants are susceptible to serious bacterial infections, particularly when they’re less than 60 days of age,” Christopher Pruitt, MD, said at the annual Pediatric Academic Societies meeting. “Among these infants, bacteremia and bacterial meningitis, also referred to as invasive bacterial infections, are associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality.”

Doug Brunk/MDedge News

Of the 442 infants included in the final analysis, the majority (80%) had bacteremia, 14% had bacterial meningitis plus bacteremia, and 6% had bacterial meningitis only. “For purposes of this study, patients with bacterial meningitis with or without bacteremia were categorized as having bacterial meningitis,” Dr. Pruitt said. He and his associates found that 14.5% of infants had one or more adverse outcomes. Adverse outcomes occurred in 39% of infants with bacterial meningitis, compared with 8.2% of infants with isolated bacteremia. Need for mechanical ventilation, vasoactive medications, and neurologic disability also was more common among infants with bacterial meningitis than it was among children with isolated bacteremia. There were 10 deaths overall, which amounted to about 2% in both groups.

On multivariate analysis, the rate of adverse outcomes was significantly higher for patients with bacterial meningitis than it was for those with isolated bacteremia (adjusted odds ratio, 8.8), for premature versus term infants (AOR, 5.9), for infants who were ill appearing versus non-ill appearing (AOR, 3.9), and for infants with no fever versus those with fever (AOR, 2.4). No significant associations with 30-day adverse outcomes were seen in patients with a complex chronic condition, compared with those without a complex chronic condition (AOR, 2.0), nor in the those aged 29-60 days versus those younger than 29 days (15% vs. 14%, respectively; AOR 0.7).

“When looking at the most common scenario – a full-term infant without an ill appearance, and bacteremia as opposed to bacterial meningitis – 3 of these 219 infants, or 1.4%, had an adverse outcome,” said Dr. Pruitt, who cares for patients in the ED at Children’s of Alabama in Birmingham. “And there were no deaths.” He also reported that 12 infants with invasive bacterial infections were discharged from the index ED visit without antimicrobial treatment. All had bacteremia and none had an adverse outcome.

Dr. Pruitt acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its retrospective design, that the outcomes were limited to 30 days, and the fact that the findings may not be generalizable to nontertiary settings. “Our findings have important implications for the care of infants with invasive bacterial infections,” he concluded. “In particular, the high rate of adverse outcomes for infants with bacterial meningitis can provide some context for clinicians in assessing the need for diagnostic evaluation for invasive bacterial infection and discussing testing and treatment with parents. Our findings may also help to inform inpatient management for hospitalized infants with invasive bacterial infections, as well as anticipatory guidance for parents, particularly around follow-up. Further prospective studies evaluating the long-term outcomes of infants with invasive bacterial infections are needed.”

The study was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Pruitt reported having no financial disclosures.

[email protected]

TORONTO – Among infants up to 60 days old with an invasive bacterial infection, adverse outcomes are associated with prematurity, ill appearance, and bacterial meningitis, a multicenter retrospective analysis found.

“Young infants are susceptible to serious bacterial infections, particularly when they’re less than 60 days of age,” Christopher Pruitt, MD, said at the annual Pediatric Academic Societies meeting. “Among these infants, bacteremia and bacterial meningitis, also referred to as invasive bacterial infections, are associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality.”

Doug Brunk/MDedge News

Of the 442 infants included in the final analysis, the majority (80%) had bacteremia, 14% had bacterial meningitis plus bacteremia, and 6% had bacterial meningitis only. “For purposes of this study, patients with bacterial meningitis with or without bacteremia were categorized as having bacterial meningitis,” Dr. Pruitt said. He and his associates found that 14.5% of infants had one or more adverse outcomes. Adverse outcomes occurred in 39% of infants with bacterial meningitis, compared with 8.2% of infants with isolated bacteremia. Need for mechanical ventilation, vasoactive medications, and neurologic disability also was more common among infants with bacterial meningitis than it was among children with isolated bacteremia. There were 10 deaths overall, which amounted to about 2% in both groups.

On multivariate analysis, the rate of adverse outcomes was significantly higher for patients with bacterial meningitis than it was for those with isolated bacteremia (adjusted odds ratio, 8.8), for premature versus term infants (AOR, 5.9), for infants who were ill appearing versus non-ill appearing (AOR, 3.9), and for infants with no fever versus those with fever (AOR, 2.4). No significant associations with 30-day adverse outcomes were seen in patients with a complex chronic condition, compared with those without a complex chronic condition (AOR, 2.0), nor in the those aged 29-60 days versus those younger than 29 days (15% vs. 14%, respectively; AOR 0.7).

“When looking at the most common scenario – a full-term infant without an ill appearance, and bacteremia as opposed to bacterial meningitis – 3 of these 219 infants, or 1.4%, had an adverse outcome,” said Dr. Pruitt, who cares for patients in the ED at Children’s of Alabama in Birmingham. “And there were no deaths.” He also reported that 12 infants with invasive bacterial infections were discharged from the index ED visit without antimicrobial treatment. All had bacteremia and none had an adverse outcome.

Dr. Pruitt acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its retrospective design, that the outcomes were limited to 30 days, and the fact that the findings may not be generalizable to nontertiary settings. “Our findings have important implications for the care of infants with invasive bacterial infections,” he concluded. “In particular, the high rate of adverse outcomes for infants with bacterial meningitis can provide some context for clinicians in assessing the need for diagnostic evaluation for invasive bacterial infection and discussing testing and treatment with parents. Our findings may also help to inform inpatient management for hospitalized infants with invasive bacterial infections, as well as anticipatory guidance for parents, particularly around follow-up. Further prospective studies evaluating the long-term outcomes of infants with invasive bacterial infections are needed.”

The study was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Pruitt reported having no financial disclosures.

[email protected]

TORONTO – Among infants up to 60 days old with an invasive bacterial infection, adverse outcomes are associated with prematurity, ill appearance, and bacterial meningitis, a multicenter retrospective analysis found.

“Young infants are susceptible to serious bacterial infections, particularly when they’re less than 60 days of age,” Christopher Pruitt, MD, said at the annual Pediatric Academic Societies meeting. “Among these infants, bacteremia and bacterial meningitis, also referred to as invasive bacterial infections, are associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality.”

Doug Brunk/MDedge News

Of the 442 infants included in the final analysis, the majority (80%) had bacteremia, 14% had bacterial meningitis plus bacteremia, and 6% had bacterial meningitis only. “For purposes of this study, patients with bacterial meningitis with or without bacteremia were categorized as having bacterial meningitis,” Dr. Pruitt said. He and his associates found that 14.5% of infants had one or more adverse outcomes. Adverse outcomes occurred in 39% of infants with bacterial meningitis, compared with 8.2% of infants with isolated bacteremia. Need for mechanical ventilation, vasoactive medications, and neurologic disability also was more common among infants with bacterial meningitis than it was among children with isolated bacteremia. There were 10 deaths overall, which amounted to about 2% in both groups.

On multivariate analysis, the rate of adverse outcomes was significantly higher for patients with bacterial meningitis than it was for those with isolated bacteremia (adjusted odds ratio, 8.8), for premature versus term infants (AOR, 5.9), for infants who were ill appearing versus non-ill appearing (AOR, 3.9), and for infants with no fever versus those with fever (AOR, 2.4). No significant associations with 30-day adverse outcomes were seen in patients with a complex chronic condition, compared with those without a complex chronic condition (AOR, 2.0), nor in the those aged 29-60 days versus those younger than 29 days (15% vs. 14%, respectively; AOR 0.7).

“When looking at the most common scenario – a full-term infant without an ill appearance, and bacteremia as opposed to bacterial meningitis – 3 of these 219 infants, or 1.4%, had an adverse outcome,” said Dr. Pruitt, who cares for patients in the ED at Children’s of Alabama in Birmingham. “And there were no deaths.” He also reported that 12 infants with invasive bacterial infections were discharged from the index ED visit without antimicrobial treatment. All had bacteremia and none had an adverse outcome.

Dr. Pruitt acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its retrospective design, that the outcomes were limited to 30 days, and the fact that the findings may not be generalizable to nontertiary settings. “Our findings have important implications for the care of infants with invasive bacterial infections,” he concluded. “In particular, the high rate of adverse outcomes for infants with bacterial meningitis can provide some context for clinicians in assessing the need for diagnostic evaluation for invasive bacterial infection and discussing testing and treatment with parents. Our findings may also help to inform inpatient management for hospitalized infants with invasive bacterial infections, as well as anticipatory guidance for parents, particularly around follow-up. Further prospective studies evaluating the long-term outcomes of infants with invasive bacterial infections are needed.”

The study was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Pruitt reported having no financial disclosures.

[email protected]

Background: Antibiotic use is associated with an increased risk of C. difficile infection. Multiple studies have investigated the effects of probiotics in reducing the risk of C. difficile infection with varied results. This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics in reducing the risk of CDAD in patients taking antibiotics.

Study design: Meta-analysis.

Setting: A comprehensive electronic search for randomized, controlled trials investigating probiotics for prevention of CDAD or C. difficile infection were considered for inclusion. There were no language, publication status, or date limits applied.

Synopsis: This meta-analysis included 31 trials (8,672 participants) evaluating the relationship between probiotics and CDAD. The outcomes were pooled using a random effects model to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. A complete case analysis suggested that probiotics reduce the risk of CDAD by 60% (1.5% vs. 4.0%; relative risk, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.52), although a post-hoc subgroup analysis showed a statistically significant benefit only among patients with a high CDAD baseline risk (greater than 5%). Adverse events were assessed in 32 trials (8,305 participants), and the pooled analysis indicated that probiotic use reduced the risk of adverse events by 17% (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.97).

Limitations to this meta-analysis include missing data from patients lost to follow-up and lack of success in testing all fecal samples. Lastly, that the strongest data for the beneficial effects of probiotics were demonstrated in patients with a high baseline risk of developing CDAD limits the study’s applicability to the general population.

Bottom line: Probiotic use in immunocompetent patients undergoing treatment with antibiotics decreases the incidence of CDAD without an increase in adverse events.

Citation: Goldenberg JZ et al. Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006095.pub4.

Dr. Skinner is a hospitalist at Denver Health Medical Center and an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora.

Background: Antibiotic use is associated with an increased risk of C. difficile infection. Multiple studies have investigated the effects of probiotics in reducing the risk of C. difficile infection with varied results. This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics in reducing the risk of CDAD in patients taking antibiotics.

Study design: Meta-analysis.

Setting: A comprehensive electronic search for randomized, controlled trials investigating probiotics for prevention of CDAD or C. difficile infection were considered for inclusion. There were no language, publication status, or date limits applied.

Synopsis: This meta-analysis included 31 trials (8,672 participants) evaluating the relationship between probiotics and CDAD. The outcomes were pooled using a random effects model to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. A complete case analysis suggested that probiotics reduce the risk of CDAD by 60% (1.5% vs. 4.0%; relative risk, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.52), although a post-hoc subgroup analysis showed a statistically significant benefit only among patients with a high CDAD baseline risk (greater than 5%). Adverse events were assessed in 32 trials (8,305 participants), and the pooled analysis indicated that probiotic use reduced the risk of adverse events by 17% (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.97).

Limitations to this meta-analysis include missing data from patients lost to follow-up and lack of success in testing all fecal samples. Lastly, that the strongest data for the beneficial effects of probiotics were demonstrated in patients with a high baseline risk of developing CDAD limits the study’s applicability to the general population.

Bottom line: Probiotic use in immunocompetent patients undergoing treatment with antibiotics decreases the incidence of CDAD without an increase in adverse events.

Citation: Goldenberg JZ et al. Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006095.pub4.

Dr. Skinner is a hospitalist at Denver Health Medical Center and an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora.

Background: Antibiotic use is associated with an increased risk of C. difficile infection. Multiple studies have investigated the effects of probiotics in reducing the risk of C. difficile infection with varied results. This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics in reducing the risk of CDAD in patients taking antibiotics.

Study design: Meta-analysis.

Setting: A comprehensive electronic search for randomized, controlled trials investigating probiotics for prevention of CDAD or C. difficile infection were considered for inclusion. There were no language, publication status, or date limits applied.

Synopsis: This meta-analysis included 31 trials (8,672 participants) evaluating the relationship between probiotics and CDAD. The outcomes were pooled using a random effects model to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. A complete case analysis suggested that probiotics reduce the risk of CDAD by 60% (1.5% vs. 4.0%; relative risk, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.52), although a post-hoc subgroup analysis showed a statistically significant benefit only among patients with a high CDAD baseline risk (greater than 5%). Adverse events were assessed in 32 trials (8,305 participants), and the pooled analysis indicated that probiotic use reduced the risk of adverse events by 17% (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.97).

Limitations to this meta-analysis include missing data from patients lost to follow-up and lack of success in testing all fecal samples. Lastly, that the strongest data for the beneficial effects of probiotics were demonstrated in patients with a high baseline risk of developing CDAD limits the study’s applicability to the general population.

Bottom line: Probiotic use in immunocompetent patients undergoing treatment with antibiotics decreases the incidence of CDAD without an increase in adverse events.

Citation: Goldenberg JZ et al. Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006095.pub4.

Dr. Skinner is a hospitalist at Denver Health Medical Center and an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora.

Come on. Everyone knows the best part of any conference is meeting up with colleagues, mentors, and friends. So here’s how to do it at (or away from) the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists in Boston on May 16-20.

No one is immune from the pull of colleagues past, present, and even future, not even the program chair Vin Tangpricha, MD, who gave the lowdown in an interview on the best venues for getting in touch.

• Thursday Night Chapter Receptions: After the first full day of the meeting, start in the room for your home chapter, then jump to your home state’s chapter, then your training chapter, and so on. This is the easiest and most exciting way at the meeting to connect with your web of colleagues, Dr. Tangpricha suggested enthusiastically. And don’t forget about AACE members from across the globe in the International Chapter Reception, in the biggest (and most fun, by some reports) party room by far. The receptions for all 22 domestic chapters and international members representing 102 countries will be held in the Sheraton Boston Hotel at 6 p.m.
• Wine and Cheese Reception: A Friday night tradition at AACE, from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. in the exhibit hall, this offers a needed break at the end of the second full day of sessions to chat with colleagues, see exhibits, and check out posters.
• Women’s Luncheon: Thursday from 12 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. on Level C. In its fifth year, this luncheon has practically outgrown the meeting, with women entering endocrinology outpacing men. Good luck getting tickets; it’s always popular, Dr. Tangpricha said.
  

  SeanPavonePhot/Thinkstock
• College Breakfast With the Masters: This first-time-ever event welcomes and celebrates all past Masters of the American College of Endocrinology (MACEs). In this free, ticketed event on Saturday morning from 6:30 a.m. to 8 a.m., the largest assembly of MACEs ever gathered in the same room will be introduced to newer AACE fellows, who will then have the opportunity to meet with Masters and gather their insights on how to further their own careers in endocrinology, Dr. Tangpricha said.
• President’s Gala: This ticketed event open to members and family is always a great finale to the meeting, held Saturday night after the convocation, is one Dr. Tangpricha always looks forward to. This family-friendly event features food, libations, and live music.
• Social networking: Stay in touch with attendees and endocrinologists following the events and news from the meeting at #AACE2018, and with a Boston Strong–inspired hashtag of #ClinicalEndoStrong.

[email protected]

Come on. Everyone knows the best part of any conference is meeting up with colleagues, mentors, and friends. So here’s how to do it at (or away from) the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists in Boston on May 16-20.

No one is immune from the pull of colleagues past, present, and even future, not even the program chair Vin Tangpricha, MD, who gave the lowdown in an interview on the best venues for getting in touch.

• Thursday Night Chapter Receptions: After the first full day of the meeting, start in the room for your home chapter, then jump to your home state’s chapter, then your training chapter, and so on. This is the easiest and most exciting way at the meeting to connect with your web of colleagues, Dr. Tangpricha suggested enthusiastically. And don’t forget about AACE members from across the globe in the International Chapter Reception, in the biggest (and most fun, by some reports) party room by far. The receptions for all 22 domestic chapters and international members representing 102 countries will be held in the Sheraton Boston Hotel at 6 p.m.
• Wine and Cheese Reception: A Friday night tradition at AACE, from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. in the exhibit hall, this offers a needed break at the end of the second full day of sessions to chat with colleagues, see exhibits, and check out posters.
• Women’s Luncheon: Thursday from 12 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. on Level C. In its fifth year, this luncheon has practically outgrown the meeting, with women entering endocrinology outpacing men. Good luck getting tickets; it’s always popular, Dr. Tangpricha said.
  

  SeanPavonePhot/Thinkstock
• College Breakfast With the Masters: This first-time-ever event welcomes and celebrates all past Masters of the American College of Endocrinology (MACEs). In this free, ticketed event on Saturday morning from 6:30 a.m. to 8 a.m., the largest assembly of MACEs ever gathered in the same room will be introduced to newer AACE fellows, who will then have the opportunity to meet with Masters and gather their insights on how to further their own careers in endocrinology, Dr. Tangpricha said.
• President’s Gala: This ticketed event open to members and family is always a great finale to the meeting, held Saturday night after the convocation, is one Dr. Tangpricha always looks forward to. This family-friendly event features food, libations, and live music.
• Social networking: Stay in touch with attendees and endocrinologists following the events and news from the meeting at #AACE2018, and with a Boston Strong–inspired hashtag of #ClinicalEndoStrong.

[email protected]

Come on. Everyone knows the best part of any conference is meeting up with colleagues, mentors, and friends. So here’s how to do it at (or away from) the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists in Boston on May 16-20.

No one is immune from the pull of colleagues past, present, and even future, not even the program chair Vin Tangpricha, MD, who gave the lowdown in an interview on the best venues for getting in touch.

• Thursday Night Chapter Receptions: After the first full day of the meeting, start in the room for your home chapter, then jump to your home state’s chapter, then your training chapter, and so on. This is the easiest and most exciting way at the meeting to connect with your web of colleagues, Dr. Tangpricha suggested enthusiastically. And don’t forget about AACE members from across the globe in the International Chapter Reception, in the biggest (and most fun, by some reports) party room by far. The receptions for all 22 domestic chapters and international members representing 102 countries will be held in the Sheraton Boston Hotel at 6 p.m.
• Wine and Cheese Reception: A Friday night tradition at AACE, from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. in the exhibit hall, this offers a needed break at the end of the second full day of sessions to chat with colleagues, see exhibits, and check out posters.
• Women’s Luncheon: Thursday from 12 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. on Level C. In its fifth year, this luncheon has practically outgrown the meeting, with women entering endocrinology outpacing men. Good luck getting tickets; it’s always popular, Dr. Tangpricha said.
  

  SeanPavonePhot/Thinkstock
• College Breakfast With the Masters: This first-time-ever event welcomes and celebrates all past Masters of the American College of Endocrinology (MACEs). In this free, ticketed event on Saturday morning from 6:30 a.m. to 8 a.m., the largest assembly of MACEs ever gathered in the same room will be introduced to newer AACE fellows, who will then have the opportunity to meet with Masters and gather their insights on how to further their own careers in endocrinology, Dr. Tangpricha said.
• President’s Gala: This ticketed event open to members and family is always a great finale to the meeting, held Saturday night after the convocation, is one Dr. Tangpricha always looks forward to. This family-friendly event features food, libations, and live music.
• Social networking: Stay in touch with attendees and endocrinologists following the events and news from the meeting at #AACE2018, and with a Boston Strong–inspired hashtag of #ClinicalEndoStrong.

[email protected]

Suicide prevention gets ‘standard care’ recommendations Also in today’s edition of the Daily News Podcast, fremanezumab may be an effective episodic migraine treatment, e-cigarette usage has changed, and there is evidence that marketing perks increased opioid prescriptions. Listen to the MDedge Daily News Podcast for all the details ons today’s top news.

Suicide prevention gets ‘standard care’ recommendations Also in today’s edition of the Daily News Podcast, fremanezumab may be an effective episodic migraine treatment, e-cigarette usage has changed, and there is evidence that marketing perks increased opioid prescriptions. Listen to the MDedge Daily News Podcast for all the details ons today’s top news.

Suicide prevention gets ‘standard care’ recommendations Also in today’s edition of the Daily News Podcast, fremanezumab may be an effective episodic migraine treatment, e-cigarette usage has changed, and there is evidence that marketing perks increased opioid prescriptions. Listen to the MDedge Daily News Podcast for all the details ons today’s top news.

Lorenzo Norris, MD, editor in chief of MDedge Psychiatry, sits down with Igor Galynker, MD, PhD, to talk about an evaluation model he and his team created aimed at assessing the risk of imminent suicide. Dr. Galynker also discusses ways clinicians can assess their own personal emotional responses to patients who are at risk.

Lorenzo Norris, MD, editor in chief of MDedge Psychiatry, sits down with Igor Galynker, MD, PhD, to talk about an evaluation model he and his team created aimed at assessing the risk of imminent suicide. Dr. Galynker also discusses ways clinicians can assess their own personal emotional responses to patients who are at risk.

Lorenzo Norris, MD, editor in chief of MDedge Psychiatry, sits down with Igor Galynker, MD, PhD, to talk about an evaluation model he and his team created aimed at assessing the risk of imminent suicide. Dr. Galynker also discusses ways clinicians can assess their own personal emotional responses to patients who are at risk.

Purulent pericarditis is an infection within the pericardial space rarely seen in the modern antibiotic era. Most cases are secondary to another infectious process of bacterial, viral, fungal, or parasitic origin.^1,2 Predisposing factors include malignancy, chronic kidney disease, immunosuppression, diabetes mellitus, and alcohol misuse disorder.¹ Although purulent pericarditis has been described extensively in the literature, it is a challenging diagnosis if it is not initially considered within the differential diagnosis repertoire.^1-4 Most authors agree that this may be because it has become an infrequent diagnosis.^1,2 In addition, purulent pericarditis may have an atypical presentation when compared with a classic case of pericarditis.^2,3 The authors believe that this forgotten entity will be revisited through this case.

Case Presentation

A 66-year-old-man was transferred to Veterans Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System (VACHS) from a community hospital with a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and bilateral pleural effusions. Four days prior to arrival at the community hospital, the patient had developed diffuse, watery diarrhea, which resolved in 3 days. After resolution of diarrhea, he began experiencing shortness of breath on exertion that progressed to onset at rest. The patient reported no fever, chills, nausea, vomiting, cough, or contact with others who were not healthy. He had a history of alcohol misuse without liver cirrhosis and reported no chronic diseases or use of medications. The patient had no history of tuberculosis exposure or pneumococcal vaccination, and had a negative interferon gamma release assay.

On admission to the community hospital, the patient was treated for CAP with ceftriaxone and azithromycin. On hospital day 3, the patient developed hypoxemia and an altered mental status. He was started on supplemental oxygen and transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). Antibiotic therapy consequently was changed to levofloxacin and meropenem. However, no clinical improvement was noted on the following days.

On hospital day 7, the patient developed acute respiratory failure that required mechanical ventilation while being transferred to VACHS via air ambulance. His vital signs on arrival were the following: temperature, 97° F; heart rate, 86 beats/min; blood pressure, 103/61 mm Hg; respiratory rate, 14 breaths/min and SaO₂ of 97%, measured while he breathed supplemental oxygen at an FiO₂ of 0.4. 

Hours after arrival, the patient developed sinus tachycardia and hypotension. A bedside 2D echocardiogram demonstrated a large pericardial effusion with diastolic collapse of the right atrium (Figure 2). 

The patient’s clinical condition improved following drainage of pericardial fluid, with no further need for inotropic support. Antibiotic therapy was changed to vancomycin and meropenem. Initial microbiologic samples from pericardial fluid demonstrated Gram-positive diplococci, suggestive of Streptococcus pneumoniae (S pneumoniae) (Figure 4). Other diagnostic pericardial fluid test results included: WBC count 25,330 cmm, with 99% neutrophils and 1% lymphocytes; total protein, 3.8 mg/dL; glucose, < 2.0 mg/dL,LDH, > 2,500 U/L, potassium hydroxide preparation. The tests found no fungus, and the acid fast bacilli smear revealed no Bacillus. However, the pericardial fluid culture failed to demonstrate growth of any organism. Blood cultures also were negative.

The patient underwent anterior thoracotomy with partial pericardiectomy, and a pericardial tube was left in place connected to drainage. During the procedure, an abundant amount of fibrinous tissue was evacuated from the pericardial space (Figure 5). 

The patient was extubated, pericardial and pleural tubes were removed, and he was transferred to the internal medicine ward 24 days after admission to the ICU. He received in-patient physical rehabilitation while completing a 6-week course of IV antibiotics (vancomycin and meropenem). After completion of therapy, the patient received the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination, and an echocardiography was repeated. No significant re-accumulation of pericardial effusion or constrictive pattern was evidenced. The patient was discharged to his out-of-state home, and follow-up was consequently lost.

Discussion

Purulent pericarditis is an infection localized within the pericardial space. Most cases are secondary to an infectious process elsewhere, which could be of bacterial, viral, fungal, or parasitic etiology.¹ Five mechanisms could lead the infecting organism to infect the pericardial space; contiguous spread from intrathoracic site, hematogenous spread, extension from myocardial site, perforating injury or surgery, and extension from a subdiaphragmatic site.¹ Predisposing factors for the development of this condition include malignancy, chronic kidney disease, immunosuppression, diabetes mellitus, and alcohol misuse. Pericarditis is an infection localized within the pericardial space.

Purulent pericarditis has become a rare entity in the antibiotic era.² Prior to the development of antibiotics, most cases were secondary to S pneumoniae.^1,2,5,6 As per Cilloniz and colleagues, about 40% to 50% of all cases of purulent pericarditis are caused by Gram-positive bacteria, mostly S pneumoniae.⁵ In this case study, bacterial culture did not reveal growth of an organism—most likely because the patient had received antibiotics elsewhere. However, Gram-positive cocci were seen within the initial pericardial aspirate. This organism was suspected to have spread contiguously from a pulmonary focus, which also led to pleural effusions.

Since the patient in this case study had no history of thoracic surgery, malignancy, or other immunosuppression, the patient’s history of alcohol misuse was the only predisposing factor for development of purulent pericarditis. Contrary to the common presentation of pericarditis, purulent pericarditis may not have the common clinical findings, such as chest pain, pericardial friction rub, and distended neck veins.^2,3 Furthermore, according to Parikh and colleagues, about 35% of affected patients may have a normal electrocardiogram.² Hence, the diagnosis of purulent pericarditis often is missed because the classic signs of pericarditis are often absent, and other nonspecific symptoms are attributed to initial underlying infection.⁷

A high index of suspicion is needed to diagnose purulent pericarditis. Once a diagnosis is made, initial treatment should consist of prompt drainage of pericardial fluid combined with systemic antibiotic therapy. Vancomycin and a third-generation cephalosporin may be started empirically until results of pericardial fluid cultures become available.³ Drainage can be achieved by pericardiocentesis, pericardiotomy, or pericardiectomy (partial or total).¹ In cases of hemodynamic instability due to cardiac tamponade, sonographically guided pericardiocentesis should be undertaken and an indwelling pericardial catheter left in place.¹ Although this is the simplest and fastest method of evacuation, it may not be effective when dealing with thick, fibrinous fluid. In such cases, intrapericardial fibrinolysis may be considered. This approach may be undertaken early in the process, after drainage insertion, or as salvage therapy, when there has been incomplete evacuation of purulent material or open surgical drainage is not available.

Streptokinase, urokinase, and tissue plasminogen activator have been used for intrapericadial fibrinolysis.¹ However, there is no definite data on dosage or frequency at which these medications should be administered. No matter the therapeutic approach, effective drainage of the pericardial fluid is crucial to avoid the development of pericardial constriction. Constrictive pericarditis occurs when fibrosis and adhesions create a dense pericardium that encases the heart. This causes impaired ventricular filling that can lead eventually to heart failure.⁴ Pericardiectomy is the definitive treatment for constrictive pericarditis.

Conclusion

Although purulent pericarditis has become a rare diagnosis since the development of antibiotics, knowledge of how to identify it is essential since mortality reaches 100% if the diagnosis is missed.⁴ Even when the condition is promptly diagnosed and treated, mortality is 40%, mainly due to cardiac tamponade, septic shock, or constriction.¹ The case presented here illustrates the clinical features associated with this condition. Knowing these features can translate in a successful patient outcome.

Purulent pericarditis is an infection within the pericardial space rarely seen in the modern antibiotic era. Most cases are secondary to another infectious process of bacterial, viral, fungal, or parasitic origin.^1,2 Predisposing factors include malignancy, chronic kidney disease, immunosuppression, diabetes mellitus, and alcohol misuse disorder.¹ Although purulent pericarditis has been described extensively in the literature, it is a challenging diagnosis if it is not initially considered within the differential diagnosis repertoire.^1-4 Most authors agree that this may be because it has become an infrequent diagnosis.^1,2 In addition, purulent pericarditis may have an atypical presentation when compared with a classic case of pericarditis.^2,3 The authors believe that this forgotten entity will be revisited through this case.

Case Presentation

A 66-year-old-man was transferred to Veterans Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System (VACHS) from a community hospital with a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and bilateral pleural effusions. Four days prior to arrival at the community hospital, the patient had developed diffuse, watery diarrhea, which resolved in 3 days. After resolution of diarrhea, he began experiencing shortness of breath on exertion that progressed to onset at rest. The patient reported no fever, chills, nausea, vomiting, cough, or contact with others who were not healthy. He had a history of alcohol misuse without liver cirrhosis and reported no chronic diseases or use of medications. The patient had no history of tuberculosis exposure or pneumococcal vaccination, and had a negative interferon gamma release assay.

On admission to the community hospital, the patient was treated for CAP with ceftriaxone and azithromycin. On hospital day 3, the patient developed hypoxemia and an altered mental status. He was started on supplemental oxygen and transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). Antibiotic therapy consequently was changed to levofloxacin and meropenem. However, no clinical improvement was noted on the following days.

On hospital day 7, the patient developed acute respiratory failure that required mechanical ventilation while being transferred to VACHS via air ambulance. His vital signs on arrival were the following: temperature, 97° F; heart rate, 86 beats/min; blood pressure, 103/61 mm Hg; respiratory rate, 14 breaths/min and SaO₂ of 97%, measured while he breathed supplemental oxygen at an FiO₂ of 0.4. 

Hours after arrival, the patient developed sinus tachycardia and hypotension. A bedside 2D echocardiogram demonstrated a large pericardial effusion with diastolic collapse of the right atrium (Figure 2). 

The patient’s clinical condition improved following drainage of pericardial fluid, with no further need for inotropic support. Antibiotic therapy was changed to vancomycin and meropenem. Initial microbiologic samples from pericardial fluid demonstrated Gram-positive diplococci, suggestive of Streptococcus pneumoniae (S pneumoniae) (Figure 4). Other diagnostic pericardial fluid test results included: WBC count 25,330 cmm, with 99% neutrophils and 1% lymphocytes; total protein, 3.8 mg/dL; glucose, < 2.0 mg/dL,LDH, > 2,500 U/L, potassium hydroxide preparation. The tests found no fungus, and the acid fast bacilli smear revealed no Bacillus. However, the pericardial fluid culture failed to demonstrate growth of any organism. Blood cultures also were negative.

The patient underwent anterior thoracotomy with partial pericardiectomy, and a pericardial tube was left in place connected to drainage. During the procedure, an abundant amount of fibrinous tissue was evacuated from the pericardial space (Figure 5). 

The patient was extubated, pericardial and pleural tubes were removed, and he was transferred to the internal medicine ward 24 days after admission to the ICU. He received in-patient physical rehabilitation while completing a 6-week course of IV antibiotics (vancomycin and meropenem). After completion of therapy, the patient received the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination, and an echocardiography was repeated. No significant re-accumulation of pericardial effusion or constrictive pattern was evidenced. The patient was discharged to his out-of-state home, and follow-up was consequently lost.

Discussion

Purulent pericarditis is an infection localized within the pericardial space. Most cases are secondary to an infectious process elsewhere, which could be of bacterial, viral, fungal, or parasitic etiology.¹ Five mechanisms could lead the infecting organism to infect the pericardial space; contiguous spread from intrathoracic site, hematogenous spread, extension from myocardial site, perforating injury or surgery, and extension from a subdiaphragmatic site.¹ Predisposing factors for the development of this condition include malignancy, chronic kidney disease, immunosuppression, diabetes mellitus, and alcohol misuse. Pericarditis is an infection localized within the pericardial space.

Purulent pericarditis has become a rare entity in the antibiotic era.² Prior to the development of antibiotics, most cases were secondary to S pneumoniae.^1,2,5,6 As per Cilloniz and colleagues, about 40% to 50% of all cases of purulent pericarditis are caused by Gram-positive bacteria, mostly S pneumoniae.⁵ In this case study, bacterial culture did not reveal growth of an organism—most likely because the patient had received antibiotics elsewhere. However, Gram-positive cocci were seen within the initial pericardial aspirate. This organism was suspected to have spread contiguously from a pulmonary focus, which also led to pleural effusions.

Since the patient in this case study had no history of thoracic surgery, malignancy, or other immunosuppression, the patient’s history of alcohol misuse was the only predisposing factor for development of purulent pericarditis. Contrary to the common presentation of pericarditis, purulent pericarditis may not have the common clinical findings, such as chest pain, pericardial friction rub, and distended neck veins.^2,3 Furthermore, according to Parikh and colleagues, about 35% of affected patients may have a normal electrocardiogram.² Hence, the diagnosis of purulent pericarditis often is missed because the classic signs of pericarditis are often absent, and other nonspecific symptoms are attributed to initial underlying infection.⁷

A high index of suspicion is needed to diagnose purulent pericarditis. Once a diagnosis is made, initial treatment should consist of prompt drainage of pericardial fluid combined with systemic antibiotic therapy. Vancomycin and a third-generation cephalosporin may be started empirically until results of pericardial fluid cultures become available.³ Drainage can be achieved by pericardiocentesis, pericardiotomy, or pericardiectomy (partial or total).¹ In cases of hemodynamic instability due to cardiac tamponade, sonographically guided pericardiocentesis should be undertaken and an indwelling pericardial catheter left in place.¹ Although this is the simplest and fastest method of evacuation, it may not be effective when dealing with thick, fibrinous fluid. In such cases, intrapericardial fibrinolysis may be considered. This approach may be undertaken early in the process, after drainage insertion, or as salvage therapy, when there has been incomplete evacuation of purulent material or open surgical drainage is not available.

Streptokinase, urokinase, and tissue plasminogen activator have been used for intrapericadial fibrinolysis.¹ However, there is no definite data on dosage or frequency at which these medications should be administered. No matter the therapeutic approach, effective drainage of the pericardial fluid is crucial to avoid the development of pericardial constriction. Constrictive pericarditis occurs when fibrosis and adhesions create a dense pericardium that encases the heart. This causes impaired ventricular filling that can lead eventually to heart failure.⁴ Pericardiectomy is the definitive treatment for constrictive pericarditis.

Conclusion

Although purulent pericarditis has become a rare diagnosis since the development of antibiotics, knowledge of how to identify it is essential since mortality reaches 100% if the diagnosis is missed.⁴ Even when the condition is promptly diagnosed and treated, mortality is 40%, mainly due to cardiac tamponade, septic shock, or constriction.¹ The case presented here illustrates the clinical features associated with this condition. Knowing these features can translate in a successful patient outcome.

Purulent pericarditis is an infection within the pericardial space rarely seen in the modern antibiotic era. Most cases are secondary to another infectious process of bacterial, viral, fungal, or parasitic origin.^1,2 Predisposing factors include malignancy, chronic kidney disease, immunosuppression, diabetes mellitus, and alcohol misuse disorder.¹ Although purulent pericarditis has been described extensively in the literature, it is a challenging diagnosis if it is not initially considered within the differential diagnosis repertoire.^1-4 Most authors agree that this may be because it has become an infrequent diagnosis.^1,2 In addition, purulent pericarditis may have an atypical presentation when compared with a classic case of pericarditis.^2,3 The authors believe that this forgotten entity will be revisited through this case.

Case Presentation

A 66-year-old-man was transferred to Veterans Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System (VACHS) from a community hospital with a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and bilateral pleural effusions. Four days prior to arrival at the community hospital, the patient had developed diffuse, watery diarrhea, which resolved in 3 days. After resolution of diarrhea, he began experiencing shortness of breath on exertion that progressed to onset at rest. The patient reported no fever, chills, nausea, vomiting, cough, or contact with others who were not healthy. He had a history of alcohol misuse without liver cirrhosis and reported no chronic diseases or use of medications. The patient had no history of tuberculosis exposure or pneumococcal vaccination, and had a negative interferon gamma release assay.

On admission to the community hospital, the patient was treated for CAP with ceftriaxone and azithromycin. On hospital day 3, the patient developed hypoxemia and an altered mental status. He was started on supplemental oxygen and transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). Antibiotic therapy consequently was changed to levofloxacin and meropenem. However, no clinical improvement was noted on the following days.

On hospital day 7, the patient developed acute respiratory failure that required mechanical ventilation while being transferred to VACHS via air ambulance. His vital signs on arrival were the following: temperature, 97° F; heart rate, 86 beats/min; blood pressure, 103/61 mm Hg; respiratory rate, 14 breaths/min and SaO₂ of 97%, measured while he breathed supplemental oxygen at an FiO₂ of 0.4. 

Hours after arrival, the patient developed sinus tachycardia and hypotension. A bedside 2D echocardiogram demonstrated a large pericardial effusion with diastolic collapse of the right atrium (Figure 2). 

The patient’s clinical condition improved following drainage of pericardial fluid, with no further need for inotropic support. Antibiotic therapy was changed to vancomycin and meropenem. Initial microbiologic samples from pericardial fluid demonstrated Gram-positive diplococci, suggestive of Streptococcus pneumoniae (S pneumoniae) (Figure 4). Other diagnostic pericardial fluid test results included: WBC count 25,330 cmm, with 99% neutrophils and 1% lymphocytes; total protein, 3.8 mg/dL; glucose, < 2.0 mg/dL,LDH, > 2,500 U/L, potassium hydroxide preparation. The tests found no fungus, and the acid fast bacilli smear revealed no Bacillus. However, the pericardial fluid culture failed to demonstrate growth of any organism. Blood cultures also were negative.

The patient underwent anterior thoracotomy with partial pericardiectomy, and a pericardial tube was left in place connected to drainage. During the procedure, an abundant amount of fibrinous tissue was evacuated from the pericardial space (Figure 5). 

The patient was extubated, pericardial and pleural tubes were removed, and he was transferred to the internal medicine ward 24 days after admission to the ICU. He received in-patient physical rehabilitation while completing a 6-week course of IV antibiotics (vancomycin and meropenem). After completion of therapy, the patient received the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination, and an echocardiography was repeated. No significant re-accumulation of pericardial effusion or constrictive pattern was evidenced. The patient was discharged to his out-of-state home, and follow-up was consequently lost.

Discussion

Purulent pericarditis is an infection localized within the pericardial space. Most cases are secondary to an infectious process elsewhere, which could be of bacterial, viral, fungal, or parasitic etiology.¹ Five mechanisms could lead the infecting organism to infect the pericardial space; contiguous spread from intrathoracic site, hematogenous spread, extension from myocardial site, perforating injury or surgery, and extension from a subdiaphragmatic site.¹ Predisposing factors for the development of this condition include malignancy, chronic kidney disease, immunosuppression, diabetes mellitus, and alcohol misuse. Pericarditis is an infection localized within the pericardial space.

Purulent pericarditis has become a rare entity in the antibiotic era.² Prior to the development of antibiotics, most cases were secondary to S pneumoniae.^1,2,5,6 As per Cilloniz and colleagues, about 40% to 50% of all cases of purulent pericarditis are caused by Gram-positive bacteria, mostly S pneumoniae.⁵ In this case study, bacterial culture did not reveal growth of an organism—most likely because the patient had received antibiotics elsewhere. However, Gram-positive cocci were seen within the initial pericardial aspirate. This organism was suspected to have spread contiguously from a pulmonary focus, which also led to pleural effusions.

Since the patient in this case study had no history of thoracic surgery, malignancy, or other immunosuppression, the patient’s history of alcohol misuse was the only predisposing factor for development of purulent pericarditis. Contrary to the common presentation of pericarditis, purulent pericarditis may not have the common clinical findings, such as chest pain, pericardial friction rub, and distended neck veins.^2,3 Furthermore, according to Parikh and colleagues, about 35% of affected patients may have a normal electrocardiogram.² Hence, the diagnosis of purulent pericarditis often is missed because the classic signs of pericarditis are often absent, and other nonspecific symptoms are attributed to initial underlying infection.⁷

A high index of suspicion is needed to diagnose purulent pericarditis. Once a diagnosis is made, initial treatment should consist of prompt drainage of pericardial fluid combined with systemic antibiotic therapy. Vancomycin and a third-generation cephalosporin may be started empirically until results of pericardial fluid cultures become available.³ Drainage can be achieved by pericardiocentesis, pericardiotomy, or pericardiectomy (partial or total).¹ In cases of hemodynamic instability due to cardiac tamponade, sonographically guided pericardiocentesis should be undertaken and an indwelling pericardial catheter left in place.¹ Although this is the simplest and fastest method of evacuation, it may not be effective when dealing with thick, fibrinous fluid. In such cases, intrapericardial fibrinolysis may be considered. This approach may be undertaken early in the process, after drainage insertion, or as salvage therapy, when there has been incomplete evacuation of purulent material or open surgical drainage is not available.

Streptokinase, urokinase, and tissue plasminogen activator have been used for intrapericadial fibrinolysis.¹ However, there is no definite data on dosage or frequency at which these medications should be administered. No matter the therapeutic approach, effective drainage of the pericardial fluid is crucial to avoid the development of pericardial constriction. Constrictive pericarditis occurs when fibrosis and adhesions create a dense pericardium that encases the heart. This causes impaired ventricular filling that can lead eventually to heart failure.⁴ Pericardiectomy is the definitive treatment for constrictive pericarditis.

Conclusion

Although purulent pericarditis has become a rare diagnosis since the development of antibiotics, knowledge of how to identify it is essential since mortality reaches 100% if the diagnosis is missed.⁴ Even when the condition is promptly diagnosed and treated, mortality is 40%, mainly due to cardiac tamponade, septic shock, or constriction.¹ The case presented here illustrates the clinical features associated with this condition. Knowing these features can translate in a successful patient outcome.

Red blood cells

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved epoetin alfa-epbx (Retacrit), a biosimilar to epoetin alfa (Epogen/Procrit).

Epoetin alfa-epbx is approved for the treatment of anemia caused by chronic kidney disease, the use of zidovudine in patients with HIV infection, and myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients who have a minimum of 2 additional months of planned chemotherapy.

Epoetin alfa-epbx is also approved for use before and after surgery to reduce the chance that red blood cell transfusions will be needed because of blood loss during elective, noncardiac, or nonvascular surgery.

As with epoetin alfa, the prescribing information for epoetin alfa-epbx contains a Boxed Warning noting that erythropoiesis-stimulating agents increase the risk of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, venous thromboembolism, thrombosis of vascular access, and tumor progression or recurrence.

The FDA granted approval of epoetin alfa-epbx to Hospira Inc., a Pfizer company.

The agency’s approval is based on a review of evidence that included structural and functional characterization, animal study data, human pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, clinical immunogenicity data, and other clinical safety and effectiveness data.

This evidence is available in an FDA briefing document on the biologics license application for epoetin alfa-epbx.

Red blood cells

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved epoetin alfa-epbx (Retacrit), a biosimilar to epoetin alfa (Epogen/Procrit).

Epoetin alfa-epbx is approved for the treatment of anemia caused by chronic kidney disease, the use of zidovudine in patients with HIV infection, and myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients who have a minimum of 2 additional months of planned chemotherapy.

Epoetin alfa-epbx is also approved for use before and after surgery to reduce the chance that red blood cell transfusions will be needed because of blood loss during elective, noncardiac, or nonvascular surgery.

As with epoetin alfa, the prescribing information for epoetin alfa-epbx contains a Boxed Warning noting that erythropoiesis-stimulating agents increase the risk of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, venous thromboembolism, thrombosis of vascular access, and tumor progression or recurrence.

The FDA granted approval of epoetin alfa-epbx to Hospira Inc., a Pfizer company.

The agency’s approval is based on a review of evidence that included structural and functional characterization, animal study data, human pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, clinical immunogenicity data, and other clinical safety and effectiveness data.

This evidence is available in an FDA briefing document on the biologics license application for epoetin alfa-epbx.

Red blood cells

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved epoetin alfa-epbx (Retacrit), a biosimilar to epoetin alfa (Epogen/Procrit).

Epoetin alfa-epbx is approved for the treatment of anemia caused by chronic kidney disease, the use of zidovudine in patients with HIV infection, and myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients who have a minimum of 2 additional months of planned chemotherapy.

Epoetin alfa-epbx is also approved for use before and after surgery to reduce the chance that red blood cell transfusions will be needed because of blood loss during elective, noncardiac, or nonvascular surgery.

As with epoetin alfa, the prescribing information for epoetin alfa-epbx contains a Boxed Warning noting that erythropoiesis-stimulating agents increase the risk of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, venous thromboembolism, thrombosis of vascular access, and tumor progression or recurrence.

The FDA granted approval of epoetin alfa-epbx to Hospira Inc., a Pfizer company.

The agency’s approval is based on a review of evidence that included structural and functional characterization, animal study data, human pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, clinical immunogenicity data, and other clinical safety and effectiveness data.

This evidence is available in an FDA briefing document on the biologics license application for epoetin alfa-epbx.