To the Editor:

Both alopecia areata (AA) and psoriasis vulgaris are chronic relapsing autoimmune diseases, with AA causing nonscarring hair loss in approximately 0.1% to 0.2%¹ of the population with a lifetime risk of 1.7%,² and psoriasis more broadly impacting 1.5% to 2% of the population.³ The helper T cell (T_H1) cytokine milieu is pathogenic in both conditions.^4-6 IFN-γ knockout mice, unlike their wild-type counterparts, do not exhibit AA.⁷ Psoriasis is notably improved by IL-10 injections, which dampen the T_H1 response.⁸ Distinct from AA, T_H17 and T_H22 cells have been implicated as key players in psoriasis pathogenesis, along with the associated IL-17 and IL-22 cytokines.^9-12

Few cases of patients with concurrent AA and psoriasis have been described. Interestingly, these cases document normal hair regrowth in the areas of psoriasis.^13-16 These cases may offer unique insight into the immune factors driving each disease. We describe a case of a man with both alopecia universalis (AU) and psoriasis who developed hair regrowth in some of the psoriatic plaques.

A 34-year-old man with concurrent AU and psoriasis who had not used any systemic or topical medication for either condition in the last year presented to our clinic seeking treatment. The patient had a history of alopecia totalis as a toddler that completely resolved by 4 years of age with the use of squaric acid dibutylester (SADBE). At 31 years of age, the alopecia recurred and was localized to the scalp. It was partially responsive to intralesional triamcinolone acetonide. The patient’s alopecia worsened over the 2 years following recurrence, ultimately progressing to AU. Two months after the alopecia recurrence, he developed the first psoriatic plaques. As the plaque psoriasis progressed, systemic therapy was initiated, first methotrexate and then etanercept. Shortly after developing AU, he lost his health insurance and discontinued all therapy. The patient’s psoriasis began to recur approximately 3 months after stopping etanercept. He was not using any other psoriasis medications. At that time, he noted terminal hair regrowth within some of the psoriatic plaques. No terminal hairs grew outside of the psoriatic plaques, and all regions with growth had previously been without hair for an extended period of time. The patient presented to our clinic approximately 1 year later. He had no other medical conditions and no relevant family history.

On initial physical examination, he had nonscarring hair loss involving nearly 100% of the body with psoriatic plaques on approximately 30% of the body surface area. Regions of terminal hair growth were confined to some but not all of the psoriatic plaques (Figure). Interestingly, the terminal hairs were primarily localized to the thickest central regions of the plaques. The patient’s psoriasis was treated with a combination of topical clobetasol and calcipotriene. In addition, he was started on tacrolimus ointment to the face and eyebrows for the AA. Maintenance of terminal hair within a region of topically treated psoriasis on the forearm persisted at the 2-month follow-up despite complete clearance of the corresponding psoriatic plaque. A small psoriatic plaque on the scalp cleared early with topical therapy without noticeable hair regrowth. The patient subsequently was started on contact immunotherapy with SADBE and intralesional triamcinolone acetonide for the scalp alopecia without satisfactory response. He decided to discontinue further attempts at treating the alopecia and requested to be restarted on etanercept therapy for recalcitrant psoriatic plaques. His psoriasis responded well to this therapy and he continues to be followed in our psoriasis clinic. One year after clearance of the treated psoriatic plaques, the corresponding terminal hairs persist.

Contact immunotherapy, most commonly with diphenylcyclopropenone or SADBE, is reported to have a 50% to 60% success rate in extensive AA, with a broad range of 9% to 87%¹⁷; however, randomized controlled trials testing the efficacy of contact immunotherapy are lacking. Although the mechanism of action of these topical sensitizers is not clearly delineated, it has been postulated that by inducing a new type of inflammatory response in the region, the immunologic milieu is changed, allowing the hair to grow. Some proposed mechanisms include promoting perifollicular lymphocyte apoptosis, preventing new recruitment of autoreactive lymphocytes, and allowing for the correction of aberrant major histocompatibility complex expression on the hair matrix epithelium to regain follicle immune privilege.^18-20

Iatrogenic immunotherapy may work analogously to the natural immune system deviation demonstrated in our patient. Psoriasis and AA are believed to form competing immune cells and cytokine milieus, thus explaining how an individual with AA could regain normal hair growth in areas of psoriasis.^15,16 The Renbök phenomenon, or reverse Köbner phenomenon, coined by Happle et al¹³ can be used to describe both the iatrogenic and natural cases of dermatologic disease improvement in response to secondary insults.¹⁴

A complex cascade of immune cells and cytokines coordinate AA pathogenesis. In the acute stage of AA, an inflammatory infiltrate of CD4⁺ T cells, CD8⁺ T cells, and antigen-presenting cells target anagen phase follicles, with a higher CD4⁺:CD8⁺ ratio in clinically active disease.^21-23 Subcutaneous injections of either CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ lymphocyte subsets from mice with AA into normal-haired mice induces disease. However, CD8⁺ T cell injections rapidly produce apparent hair loss, whereas CD4⁺ T cells cause hair loss after several weeks, suggesting that CD8⁺ T cells directly modulate AA hair loss and CD4⁺ T cells act as an aide.²⁴ The growth, differentiation, and survival of CD8⁺ T cells are stimulated by IL-2 and IFN-γ. Alopecia areata biopsies demonstrate a prevalence of T_H1 cytokines, and patients with localized AA, alopecia totalis, and AU have notably higher serum IFN-γ levels compared to controls.²⁵ In murine models, IL-1α and IL-1β increase during the catagen phase of the hair cycle and peak during the telogen phase.²⁶ Excessive IL-1β expression is detected in the early stages of human disease, and certain IL-1β polymorphisms are associated with severe forms of AA.²⁶ The role of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α in AA is not well understood. In vitro studies show it inhibits hair growth, suggesting the cytokine may play a role in AA.²⁷ However, anti–TNF-α therapy is not effective in AA, and case reports propose these therapies rarely induce AA.^28-31

The T_H1 response is likewise critical to psoriatic plaque development. IFN-γ and TNF-α are overexpressed in psoriatic plaques.³² IFN-γ has an antiproliferative and differentiation-inducing effect on normal keratinocytes, but psoriatic epithelial cells in vitro respond differently to the cytokine with a notably diminished growth inhibition.^33,34 One explanation for the role of IFN-γ is that it stimulates dendritic cells to produce IL-1 and IL-23.³⁵ IL-23 activates T_H17 cells³⁶; T_H1 and T_H17 conditions produce IL-22 whose serum level correlates with disease severity.^37-39 IL-22 induces keratinocyte proliferation and migration and inhibits keratinocyte differentiation, helping account for hallmarks of the disease.⁴⁰ Patients with psoriasis have increased levels of T_H1, T_H17, and T_H22 cells, as well as their associated cytokines, in the skin and blood compared to controls.^{4,11,32,39,41}

Alopecia areata and psoriasis are regulated by complex and still not entirely understood immune interactions. The fact that many of the same therapies are used to treat both diseases emphasizes both their overlapping characteristics and the lack of targeted therapy. It is unclear if and how the topical or systemic therapies used in our patient to treat one disease affected the natural history of the other condition. It is important to highlight, however, that the patient had not been treated for months when he developed the psoriatic plaques with hair regrowth. Other case reports also document hair regrowth in untreated plaques,^13,16 making it unlikely to be a side effect of the medication regimen. For both psoriasis and AA, the immune cell composition and cytokine levels in the skin or serum vary throughout a patient’s disease course depending on severity of disease or response to treatment.^6,39,42,43 Therefore, we hypothesize that the 2 conditions interact in a similarly distinct manner based on each disease’s stage and intensity in the patient. Both our patient’s course thus far and the various presentations described by other groups support this hypothesis. Our patient had a small region of psoriasis on the scalp that cleared without any terminal hair growth. He also had larger plaques on the forearms that developed hair growth most predominantly within the thicker regions of the plaques. His unique presentation highlights the fluidity of the immune factors driving psoriasis vulgaris and AA.

To the Editor:

Both alopecia areata (AA) and psoriasis vulgaris are chronic relapsing autoimmune diseases, with AA causing nonscarring hair loss in approximately 0.1% to 0.2%¹ of the population with a lifetime risk of 1.7%,² and psoriasis more broadly impacting 1.5% to 2% of the population.³ The helper T cell (T_H1) cytokine milieu is pathogenic in both conditions.^4-6 IFN-γ knockout mice, unlike their wild-type counterparts, do not exhibit AA.⁷ Psoriasis is notably improved by IL-10 injections, which dampen the T_H1 response.⁸ Distinct from AA, T_H17 and T_H22 cells have been implicated as key players in psoriasis pathogenesis, along with the associated IL-17 and IL-22 cytokines.^9-12

Few cases of patients with concurrent AA and psoriasis have been described. Interestingly, these cases document normal hair regrowth in the areas of psoriasis.^13-16 These cases may offer unique insight into the immune factors driving each disease. We describe a case of a man with both alopecia universalis (AU) and psoriasis who developed hair regrowth in some of the psoriatic plaques.

A 34-year-old man with concurrent AU and psoriasis who had not used any systemic or topical medication for either condition in the last year presented to our clinic seeking treatment. The patient had a history of alopecia totalis as a toddler that completely resolved by 4 years of age with the use of squaric acid dibutylester (SADBE). At 31 years of age, the alopecia recurred and was localized to the scalp. It was partially responsive to intralesional triamcinolone acetonide. The patient’s alopecia worsened over the 2 years following recurrence, ultimately progressing to AU. Two months after the alopecia recurrence, he developed the first psoriatic plaques. As the plaque psoriasis progressed, systemic therapy was initiated, first methotrexate and then etanercept. Shortly after developing AU, he lost his health insurance and discontinued all therapy. The patient’s psoriasis began to recur approximately 3 months after stopping etanercept. He was not using any other psoriasis medications. At that time, he noted terminal hair regrowth within some of the psoriatic plaques. No terminal hairs grew outside of the psoriatic plaques, and all regions with growth had previously been without hair for an extended period of time. The patient presented to our clinic approximately 1 year later. He had no other medical conditions and no relevant family history.

On initial physical examination, he had nonscarring hair loss involving nearly 100% of the body with psoriatic plaques on approximately 30% of the body surface area. Regions of terminal hair growth were confined to some but not all of the psoriatic plaques (Figure). Interestingly, the terminal hairs were primarily localized to the thickest central regions of the plaques. The patient’s psoriasis was treated with a combination of topical clobetasol and calcipotriene. In addition, he was started on tacrolimus ointment to the face and eyebrows for the AA. Maintenance of terminal hair within a region of topically treated psoriasis on the forearm persisted at the 2-month follow-up despite complete clearance of the corresponding psoriatic plaque. A small psoriatic plaque on the scalp cleared early with topical therapy without noticeable hair regrowth. The patient subsequently was started on contact immunotherapy with SADBE and intralesional triamcinolone acetonide for the scalp alopecia without satisfactory response. He decided to discontinue further attempts at treating the alopecia and requested to be restarted on etanercept therapy for recalcitrant psoriatic plaques. His psoriasis responded well to this therapy and he continues to be followed in our psoriasis clinic. One year after clearance of the treated psoriatic plaques, the corresponding terminal hairs persist.

Contact immunotherapy, most commonly with diphenylcyclopropenone or SADBE, is reported to have a 50% to 60% success rate in extensive AA, with a broad range of 9% to 87%¹⁷; however, randomized controlled trials testing the efficacy of contact immunotherapy are lacking. Although the mechanism of action of these topical sensitizers is not clearly delineated, it has been postulated that by inducing a new type of inflammatory response in the region, the immunologic milieu is changed, allowing the hair to grow. Some proposed mechanisms include promoting perifollicular lymphocyte apoptosis, preventing new recruitment of autoreactive lymphocytes, and allowing for the correction of aberrant major histocompatibility complex expression on the hair matrix epithelium to regain follicle immune privilege.^18-20

Iatrogenic immunotherapy may work analogously to the natural immune system deviation demonstrated in our patient. Psoriasis and AA are believed to form competing immune cells and cytokine milieus, thus explaining how an individual with AA could regain normal hair growth in areas of psoriasis.^15,16 The Renbök phenomenon, or reverse Köbner phenomenon, coined by Happle et al¹³ can be used to describe both the iatrogenic and natural cases of dermatologic disease improvement in response to secondary insults.¹⁴

A complex cascade of immune cells and cytokines coordinate AA pathogenesis. In the acute stage of AA, an inflammatory infiltrate of CD4⁺ T cells, CD8⁺ T cells, and antigen-presenting cells target anagen phase follicles, with a higher CD4⁺:CD8⁺ ratio in clinically active disease.^21-23 Subcutaneous injections of either CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ lymphocyte subsets from mice with AA into normal-haired mice induces disease. However, CD8⁺ T cell injections rapidly produce apparent hair loss, whereas CD4⁺ T cells cause hair loss after several weeks, suggesting that CD8⁺ T cells directly modulate AA hair loss and CD4⁺ T cells act as an aide.²⁴ The growth, differentiation, and survival of CD8⁺ T cells are stimulated by IL-2 and IFN-γ. Alopecia areata biopsies demonstrate a prevalence of T_H1 cytokines, and patients with localized AA, alopecia totalis, and AU have notably higher serum IFN-γ levels compared to controls.²⁵ In murine models, IL-1α and IL-1β increase during the catagen phase of the hair cycle and peak during the telogen phase.²⁶ Excessive IL-1β expression is detected in the early stages of human disease, and certain IL-1β polymorphisms are associated with severe forms of AA.²⁶ The role of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α in AA is not well understood. In vitro studies show it inhibits hair growth, suggesting the cytokine may play a role in AA.²⁷ However, anti–TNF-α therapy is not effective in AA, and case reports propose these therapies rarely induce AA.^28-31

The T_H1 response is likewise critical to psoriatic plaque development. IFN-γ and TNF-α are overexpressed in psoriatic plaques.³² IFN-γ has an antiproliferative and differentiation-inducing effect on normal keratinocytes, but psoriatic epithelial cells in vitro respond differently to the cytokine with a notably diminished growth inhibition.^33,34 One explanation for the role of IFN-γ is that it stimulates dendritic cells to produce IL-1 and IL-23.³⁵ IL-23 activates T_H17 cells³⁶; T_H1 and T_H17 conditions produce IL-22 whose serum level correlates with disease severity.^37-39 IL-22 induces keratinocyte proliferation and migration and inhibits keratinocyte differentiation, helping account for hallmarks of the disease.⁴⁰ Patients with psoriasis have increased levels of T_H1, T_H17, and T_H22 cells, as well as their associated cytokines, in the skin and blood compared to controls.^{4,11,32,39,41}

Alopecia areata and psoriasis are regulated by complex and still not entirely understood immune interactions. The fact that many of the same therapies are used to treat both diseases emphasizes both their overlapping characteristics and the lack of targeted therapy. It is unclear if and how the topical or systemic therapies used in our patient to treat one disease affected the natural history of the other condition. It is important to highlight, however, that the patient had not been treated for months when he developed the psoriatic plaques with hair regrowth. Other case reports also document hair regrowth in untreated plaques,^13,16 making it unlikely to be a side effect of the medication regimen. For both psoriasis and AA, the immune cell composition and cytokine levels in the skin or serum vary throughout a patient’s disease course depending on severity of disease or response to treatment.^6,39,42,43 Therefore, we hypothesize that the 2 conditions interact in a similarly distinct manner based on each disease’s stage and intensity in the patient. Both our patient’s course thus far and the various presentations described by other groups support this hypothesis. Our patient had a small region of psoriasis on the scalp that cleared without any terminal hair growth. He also had larger plaques on the forearms that developed hair growth most predominantly within the thicker regions of the plaques. His unique presentation highlights the fluidity of the immune factors driving psoriasis vulgaris and AA.

To the Editor:

Both alopecia areata (AA) and psoriasis vulgaris are chronic relapsing autoimmune diseases, with AA causing nonscarring hair loss in approximately 0.1% to 0.2%¹ of the population with a lifetime risk of 1.7%,² and psoriasis more broadly impacting 1.5% to 2% of the population.³ The helper T cell (T_H1) cytokine milieu is pathogenic in both conditions.^4-6 IFN-γ knockout mice, unlike their wild-type counterparts, do not exhibit AA.⁷ Psoriasis is notably improved by IL-10 injections, which dampen the T_H1 response.⁸ Distinct from AA, T_H17 and T_H22 cells have been implicated as key players in psoriasis pathogenesis, along with the associated IL-17 and IL-22 cytokines.^9-12

Few cases of patients with concurrent AA and psoriasis have been described. Interestingly, these cases document normal hair regrowth in the areas of psoriasis.^13-16 These cases may offer unique insight into the immune factors driving each disease. We describe a case of a man with both alopecia universalis (AU) and psoriasis who developed hair regrowth in some of the psoriatic plaques.

A 34-year-old man with concurrent AU and psoriasis who had not used any systemic or topical medication for either condition in the last year presented to our clinic seeking treatment. The patient had a history of alopecia totalis as a toddler that completely resolved by 4 years of age with the use of squaric acid dibutylester (SADBE). At 31 years of age, the alopecia recurred and was localized to the scalp. It was partially responsive to intralesional triamcinolone acetonide. The patient’s alopecia worsened over the 2 years following recurrence, ultimately progressing to AU. Two months after the alopecia recurrence, he developed the first psoriatic plaques. As the plaque psoriasis progressed, systemic therapy was initiated, first methotrexate and then etanercept. Shortly after developing AU, he lost his health insurance and discontinued all therapy. The patient’s psoriasis began to recur approximately 3 months after stopping etanercept. He was not using any other psoriasis medications. At that time, he noted terminal hair regrowth within some of the psoriatic plaques. No terminal hairs grew outside of the psoriatic plaques, and all regions with growth had previously been without hair for an extended period of time. The patient presented to our clinic approximately 1 year later. He had no other medical conditions and no relevant family history.

On initial physical examination, he had nonscarring hair loss involving nearly 100% of the body with psoriatic plaques on approximately 30% of the body surface area. Regions of terminal hair growth were confined to some but not all of the psoriatic plaques (Figure). Interestingly, the terminal hairs were primarily localized to the thickest central regions of the plaques. The patient’s psoriasis was treated with a combination of topical clobetasol and calcipotriene. In addition, he was started on tacrolimus ointment to the face and eyebrows for the AA. Maintenance of terminal hair within a region of topically treated psoriasis on the forearm persisted at the 2-month follow-up despite complete clearance of the corresponding psoriatic plaque. A small psoriatic plaque on the scalp cleared early with topical therapy without noticeable hair regrowth. The patient subsequently was started on contact immunotherapy with SADBE and intralesional triamcinolone acetonide for the scalp alopecia without satisfactory response. He decided to discontinue further attempts at treating the alopecia and requested to be restarted on etanercept therapy for recalcitrant psoriatic plaques. His psoriasis responded well to this therapy and he continues to be followed in our psoriasis clinic. One year after clearance of the treated psoriatic plaques, the corresponding terminal hairs persist.

Contact immunotherapy, most commonly with diphenylcyclopropenone or SADBE, is reported to have a 50% to 60% success rate in extensive AA, with a broad range of 9% to 87%¹⁷; however, randomized controlled trials testing the efficacy of contact immunotherapy are lacking. Although the mechanism of action of these topical sensitizers is not clearly delineated, it has been postulated that by inducing a new type of inflammatory response in the region, the immunologic milieu is changed, allowing the hair to grow. Some proposed mechanisms include promoting perifollicular lymphocyte apoptosis, preventing new recruitment of autoreactive lymphocytes, and allowing for the correction of aberrant major histocompatibility complex expression on the hair matrix epithelium to regain follicle immune privilege.^18-20

Iatrogenic immunotherapy may work analogously to the natural immune system deviation demonstrated in our patient. Psoriasis and AA are believed to form competing immune cells and cytokine milieus, thus explaining how an individual with AA could regain normal hair growth in areas of psoriasis.^15,16 The Renbök phenomenon, or reverse Köbner phenomenon, coined by Happle et al¹³ can be used to describe both the iatrogenic and natural cases of dermatologic disease improvement in response to secondary insults.¹⁴

A complex cascade of immune cells and cytokines coordinate AA pathogenesis. In the acute stage of AA, an inflammatory infiltrate of CD4⁺ T cells, CD8⁺ T cells, and antigen-presenting cells target anagen phase follicles, with a higher CD4⁺:CD8⁺ ratio in clinically active disease.^21-23 Subcutaneous injections of either CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ lymphocyte subsets from mice with AA into normal-haired mice induces disease. However, CD8⁺ T cell injections rapidly produce apparent hair loss, whereas CD4⁺ T cells cause hair loss after several weeks, suggesting that CD8⁺ T cells directly modulate AA hair loss and CD4⁺ T cells act as an aide.²⁴ The growth, differentiation, and survival of CD8⁺ T cells are stimulated by IL-2 and IFN-γ. Alopecia areata biopsies demonstrate a prevalence of T_H1 cytokines, and patients with localized AA, alopecia totalis, and AU have notably higher serum IFN-γ levels compared to controls.²⁵ In murine models, IL-1α and IL-1β increase during the catagen phase of the hair cycle and peak during the telogen phase.²⁶ Excessive IL-1β expression is detected in the early stages of human disease, and certain IL-1β polymorphisms are associated with severe forms of AA.²⁶ The role of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α in AA is not well understood. In vitro studies show it inhibits hair growth, suggesting the cytokine may play a role in AA.²⁷ However, anti–TNF-α therapy is not effective in AA, and case reports propose these therapies rarely induce AA.^28-31

The T_H1 response is likewise critical to psoriatic plaque development. IFN-γ and TNF-α are overexpressed in psoriatic plaques.³² IFN-γ has an antiproliferative and differentiation-inducing effect on normal keratinocytes, but psoriatic epithelial cells in vitro respond differently to the cytokine with a notably diminished growth inhibition.^33,34 One explanation for the role of IFN-γ is that it stimulates dendritic cells to produce IL-1 and IL-23.³⁵ IL-23 activates T_H17 cells³⁶; T_H1 and T_H17 conditions produce IL-22 whose serum level correlates with disease severity.^37-39 IL-22 induces keratinocyte proliferation and migration and inhibits keratinocyte differentiation, helping account for hallmarks of the disease.⁴⁰ Patients with psoriasis have increased levels of T_H1, T_H17, and T_H22 cells, as well as their associated cytokines, in the skin and blood compared to controls.^{4,11,32,39,41}

Alopecia areata and psoriasis are regulated by complex and still not entirely understood immune interactions. The fact that many of the same therapies are used to treat both diseases emphasizes both their overlapping characteristics and the lack of targeted therapy. It is unclear if and how the topical or systemic therapies used in our patient to treat one disease affected the natural history of the other condition. It is important to highlight, however, that the patient had not been treated for months when he developed the psoriatic plaques with hair regrowth. Other case reports also document hair regrowth in untreated plaques,^13,16 making it unlikely to be a side effect of the medication regimen. For both psoriasis and AA, the immune cell composition and cytokine levels in the skin or serum vary throughout a patient’s disease course depending on severity of disease or response to treatment.^6,39,42,43 Therefore, we hypothesize that the 2 conditions interact in a similarly distinct manner based on each disease’s stage and intensity in the patient. Both our patient’s course thus far and the various presentations described by other groups support this hypothesis. Our patient had a small region of psoriasis on the scalp that cleared without any terminal hair growth. He also had larger plaques on the forearms that developed hair growth most predominantly within the thicker regions of the plaques. His unique presentation highlights the fluidity of the immune factors driving psoriasis vulgaris and AA.

The obstetrics and gynecology written board exam made everything seem cut and dry. A patient with fibroids causing heavy bleeding? Management options include hormone treatment, minor surgical procedures, or major surgical procedures like myomectomy or hysterectomy. A pregnant patient in labor with a fetal heart rate deceleration? The next step is to shut off the oxytocin infusion, turn the patient on her left side, administer intravenous fluids, and give her oxygen via a nasal cannula. A patient who has ruptured her membranes at 28 weeks? That’s an easy one: magnesium for neuroprotection, latency antibiotics, prenatal steroids, neonatalogy consult. Straightforward.

At the end of June, I was grateful for my residency experience – even though some of it seemed hectic and haphazard – because it ensured that I understood the reasoning behind these multiple-choice questions. But then I started my maternal-fetal medicine fellowship this past July. I was learning the names of new residents, attendings, and nurses, and having to orient myself to an entirely different hospital system. Even labor and delivery board sign-out was completely different. I reassured myself by thinking: Obstetrics is obstetrics. The rules and guidelines of obstetrics are universal, practiced at every level, and always make sense, right?

Dr. Grossman recently completed her residency in obstetrics and gynecology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine–Montefiore Hospital in the Bronx, N.Y., and is currently a first-year maternal-fetal medicine fellow at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York. She reported having no financial disclosures.

*This article was update April 21, 2107.

The obstetrics and gynecology written board exam made everything seem cut and dry. A patient with fibroids causing heavy bleeding? Management options include hormone treatment, minor surgical procedures, or major surgical procedures like myomectomy or hysterectomy. A pregnant patient in labor with a fetal heart rate deceleration? The next step is to shut off the oxytocin infusion, turn the patient on her left side, administer intravenous fluids, and give her oxygen via a nasal cannula. A patient who has ruptured her membranes at 28 weeks? That’s an easy one: magnesium for neuroprotection, latency antibiotics, prenatal steroids, neonatalogy consult. Straightforward.

At the end of June, I was grateful for my residency experience – even though some of it seemed hectic and haphazard – because it ensured that I understood the reasoning behind these multiple-choice questions. But then I started my maternal-fetal medicine fellowship this past July. I was learning the names of new residents, attendings, and nurses, and having to orient myself to an entirely different hospital system. Even labor and delivery board sign-out was completely different. I reassured myself by thinking: Obstetrics is obstetrics. The rules and guidelines of obstetrics are universal, practiced at every level, and always make sense, right?

Dr. Grossman recently completed her residency in obstetrics and gynecology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine–Montefiore Hospital in the Bronx, N.Y., and is currently a first-year maternal-fetal medicine fellow at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York. She reported having no financial disclosures.

*This article was update April 21, 2107.

The obstetrics and gynecology written board exam made everything seem cut and dry. A patient with fibroids causing heavy bleeding? Management options include hormone treatment, minor surgical procedures, or major surgical procedures like myomectomy or hysterectomy. A pregnant patient in labor with a fetal heart rate deceleration? The next step is to shut off the oxytocin infusion, turn the patient on her left side, administer intravenous fluids, and give her oxygen via a nasal cannula. A patient who has ruptured her membranes at 28 weeks? That’s an easy one: magnesium for neuroprotection, latency antibiotics, prenatal steroids, neonatalogy consult. Straightforward.

At the end of June, I was grateful for my residency experience – even though some of it seemed hectic and haphazard – because it ensured that I understood the reasoning behind these multiple-choice questions. But then I started my maternal-fetal medicine fellowship this past July. I was learning the names of new residents, attendings, and nurses, and having to orient myself to an entirely different hospital system. Even labor and delivery board sign-out was completely different. I reassured myself by thinking: Obstetrics is obstetrics. The rules and guidelines of obstetrics are universal, practiced at every level, and always make sense, right?

Dr. Grossman recently completed her residency in obstetrics and gynecology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine–Montefiore Hospital in the Bronx, N.Y., and is currently a first-year maternal-fetal medicine fellow at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York. She reported having no financial disclosures.

*This article was update April 21, 2107.

Patients with obesity need a multidisciplinary approach to achieve a healthy weight. AGA understands the importance of embracing obesity as a chronic, relapsing disease and supports a multidisciplinary approach to the management of obesity led by gastroenterologists.

To watch

AGA Solutions to Successful Obesity Program Integration: Andres Acosta, MD, PhD, assistant professor in medicine, clinical enteric neuroscience translational and epidemiological research, division of gastroenterology and hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, and Sarah Streett, MD, AGAF, clinical associate professor and director of IBD, Stanford (Calif.) University, discuss the AGA Obesity Guide and how GIs can begin to implement the program in their practices. Watch the on-demand webinar in the AGA Community resource library.

To read

POWER: Practice Guide on Obesity and Weight Management, Education and Resources: This practice guide on obesity and weight management will help you develop a multidisciplinary team and obesity care model for your practice.

Episode-of-Care Framework for the Management of Obesity: Moving toward high-value, high-quality care – AGA established an obesity episode-of-care model to develop a framework to support value-based management of patients with obesity, focusing on the provision of nonsurgical and endoscopic services.

These resources are available at www.gastro.org/obesity.

To discuss

Visit the AGA Community to join the discussion on managing your patient with obesity.

Patients with obesity need a multidisciplinary approach to achieve a healthy weight. AGA understands the importance of embracing obesity as a chronic, relapsing disease and supports a multidisciplinary approach to the management of obesity led by gastroenterologists.

To watch

AGA Solutions to Successful Obesity Program Integration: Andres Acosta, MD, PhD, assistant professor in medicine, clinical enteric neuroscience translational and epidemiological research, division of gastroenterology and hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, and Sarah Streett, MD, AGAF, clinical associate professor and director of IBD, Stanford (Calif.) University, discuss the AGA Obesity Guide and how GIs can begin to implement the program in their practices. Watch the on-demand webinar in the AGA Community resource library.

To read

POWER: Practice Guide on Obesity and Weight Management, Education and Resources: This practice guide on obesity and weight management will help you develop a multidisciplinary team and obesity care model for your practice.

Episode-of-Care Framework for the Management of Obesity: Moving toward high-value, high-quality care – AGA established an obesity episode-of-care model to develop a framework to support value-based management of patients with obesity, focusing on the provision of nonsurgical and endoscopic services.

These resources are available at www.gastro.org/obesity.

To discuss

Visit the AGA Community to join the discussion on managing your patient with obesity.

Patients with obesity need a multidisciplinary approach to achieve a healthy weight. AGA understands the importance of embracing obesity as a chronic, relapsing disease and supports a multidisciplinary approach to the management of obesity led by gastroenterologists.

To watch

AGA Solutions to Successful Obesity Program Integration: Andres Acosta, MD, PhD, assistant professor in medicine, clinical enteric neuroscience translational and epidemiological research, division of gastroenterology and hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, and Sarah Streett, MD, AGAF, clinical associate professor and director of IBD, Stanford (Calif.) University, discuss the AGA Obesity Guide and how GIs can begin to implement the program in their practices. Watch the on-demand webinar in the AGA Community resource library.

To read

POWER: Practice Guide on Obesity and Weight Management, Education and Resources: This practice guide on obesity and weight management will help you develop a multidisciplinary team and obesity care model for your practice.

Episode-of-Care Framework for the Management of Obesity: Moving toward high-value, high-quality care – AGA established an obesity episode-of-care model to develop a framework to support value-based management of patients with obesity, focusing on the provision of nonsurgical and endoscopic services.

These resources are available at www.gastro.org/obesity.

To discuss

Visit the AGA Community to join the discussion on managing your patient with obesity.

The Food and Drug Administration recently authorized 23andMe to provide consumers with results of germline DNA sequence variants associated with risk for 10 health conditions, among them hereditary hemochromatosis, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, celiac disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease. After they submit a saliva sample and pay a test fee, customers ordering the online test will receive a report delineating their ancestry markers and informing them whether they carry any of the genetic variants associated with selected health risks included on the targeted DNA sequencing panel.

Dr. Stoffel is a gastroenterologist, assistant professor of internal medicine, and director of the cancer genetics clinic at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. She has no disclosures.

The Food and Drug Administration recently authorized 23andMe to provide consumers with results of germline DNA sequence variants associated with risk for 10 health conditions, among them hereditary hemochromatosis, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, celiac disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease. After they submit a saliva sample and pay a test fee, customers ordering the online test will receive a report delineating their ancestry markers and informing them whether they carry any of the genetic variants associated with selected health risks included on the targeted DNA sequencing panel.

Dr. Stoffel is a gastroenterologist, assistant professor of internal medicine, and director of the cancer genetics clinic at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. She has no disclosures.

The Food and Drug Administration recently authorized 23andMe to provide consumers with results of germline DNA sequence variants associated with risk for 10 health conditions, among them hereditary hemochromatosis, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, celiac disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease. After they submit a saliva sample and pay a test fee, customers ordering the online test will receive a report delineating their ancestry markers and informing them whether they carry any of the genetic variants associated with selected health risks included on the targeted DNA sequencing panel.

Dr. Stoffel is a gastroenterologist, assistant professor of internal medicine, and director of the cancer genetics clinic at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. She has no disclosures.

Consider revaccinating all perinatally HIV-infected adolescents who did not initiate highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) at the time of initial infant hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination, with a three-dose HBV schedule, recommended researchers at Mahidol University, Bangkok, in a recent study.

In a prospective study from March 2012 to March 2014 ultimately involving 162 perinatally HIV-infected adolescents with immune reconstitution, only 3.6% were receiving HAART at the time of initial infant HBV vaccination and 96.3% had undetectable antihepatitis B surface antibodies (anti-HBs) at baseline. Adolescents with breakthrough HBV infection had been excluded from the cohort.

Joseph Abbott/Thinkstock

Consider revaccinating all perinatally HIV-infected adolescents who did not initiate highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) at the time of initial infant hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination, with a three-dose HBV schedule, recommended researchers at Mahidol University, Bangkok, in a recent study.

In a prospective study from March 2012 to March 2014 ultimately involving 162 perinatally HIV-infected adolescents with immune reconstitution, only 3.6% were receiving HAART at the time of initial infant HBV vaccination and 96.3% had undetectable antihepatitis B surface antibodies (anti-HBs) at baseline. Adolescents with breakthrough HBV infection had been excluded from the cohort.

Joseph Abbott/Thinkstock

Consider revaccinating all perinatally HIV-infected adolescents who did not initiate highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) at the time of initial infant hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination, with a three-dose HBV schedule, recommended researchers at Mahidol University, Bangkok, in a recent study.

In a prospective study from March 2012 to March 2014 ultimately involving 162 perinatally HIV-infected adolescents with immune reconstitution, only 3.6% were receiving HAART at the time of initial infant HBV vaccination and 96.3% had undetectable antihepatitis B surface antibodies (anti-HBs) at baseline. Adolescents with breakthrough HBV infection had been excluded from the cohort.

Joseph Abbott/Thinkstock

ACS Surgery News will be in Las Vegas this week at the annual meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons reporting on the latest in multidisciplinary management of benign and not-so-benign breast disease. Our reporters will cover controversies in neoadjuvant therapy, including managing axilla and skipping surgery with biopsy proven pathological complete response (pCR), as well as the use of axillary ultrasound on a clinically negative axilla, and what to do for in situ carcinoma and borderline cases. Coverage will also include the latest updates in high-risk and genetic predisposition, breast cancer subtypes, lymphedema, and recurrent and metastatic breast cancer, and guidance for coding and reimbursement.

Highly anticipated presentations include:

• Many Women are Choosing Unnecessarily Radical Surgeries for Early-Stage Cancer

• Debunking the Myth of Lymphedema Risk

• Aggressive Inflammatory Breast Cancer Treatment Yields Low Local/Regional Recurrence

Our team will provide daily coverage, beginning Thursday, April 27.

ACS Surgery News will be in Las Vegas this week at the annual meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons reporting on the latest in multidisciplinary management of benign and not-so-benign breast disease. Our reporters will cover controversies in neoadjuvant therapy, including managing axilla and skipping surgery with biopsy proven pathological complete response (pCR), as well as the use of axillary ultrasound on a clinically negative axilla, and what to do for in situ carcinoma and borderline cases. Coverage will also include the latest updates in high-risk and genetic predisposition, breast cancer subtypes, lymphedema, and recurrent and metastatic breast cancer, and guidance for coding and reimbursement.

Highly anticipated presentations include:

• Many Women are Choosing Unnecessarily Radical Surgeries for Early-Stage Cancer

• Debunking the Myth of Lymphedema Risk

• Aggressive Inflammatory Breast Cancer Treatment Yields Low Local/Regional Recurrence

Our team will provide daily coverage, beginning Thursday, April 27.

ACS Surgery News will be in Las Vegas this week at the annual meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons reporting on the latest in multidisciplinary management of benign and not-so-benign breast disease. Our reporters will cover controversies in neoadjuvant therapy, including managing axilla and skipping surgery with biopsy proven pathological complete response (pCR), as well as the use of axillary ultrasound on a clinically negative axilla, and what to do for in situ carcinoma and borderline cases. Coverage will also include the latest updates in high-risk and genetic predisposition, breast cancer subtypes, lymphedema, and recurrent and metastatic breast cancer, and guidance for coding and reimbursement.

Highly anticipated presentations include:

• Many Women are Choosing Unnecessarily Radical Surgeries for Early-Stage Cancer

• Debunking the Myth of Lymphedema Risk

• Aggressive Inflammatory Breast Cancer Treatment Yields Low Local/Regional Recurrence

Our team will provide daily coverage, beginning Thursday, April 27.

Optimum antithymocyte globulin exposure after allogeneic hemopoietic cell transplantation (HTC) is associated with a higher probability of survival as a result of reductions in transplant-related and relapse-related deaths, based on findings from a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

The findings come from a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of data from 146 patients with acute lymphoid leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome. All were receiving their first T cell–repleted allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell HCT with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as part of their nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen. Based on hazard ratios for overall survival, nonrelapse mortality, and relapse-related mortality, the optimum range of ATG exposure was 60-95 arbitrary units per day/mL, Rick Admiraal, MD, of the University Medical Centre Utrecht, Netherlands, and his colleagues reported in the Lancet Haematology (Lancet Haematol. 2017 Apr;4[4]:e183-91).

The estimated 5-year survival was significantly greater with optimum ATG exposure than with below-optimum exposure (69% vs. 32%; hazard ratio, 2.41) or with above-optimum exposure (69% vs. 48%; hazard ratio, 2.11).

Optimum ATG exposure also was associated with a greater likelihood of event-free survival: The hazard ratio was 2.54 for those with below-optimum exposure and 1.83 for those with above-optimum exposure, the researchers said. Further, above-optimum exposure was associated with higher relapse-related mortality (hazard ratio, 2.66). Below-optimum exposure was associated with higher non-relapse mortality (hazard ratio, 4.36) as well as with a higher risk for grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (hazard ratio, 3.09), but not for chronic graft-versus-host disease (hazard ratio, 2.38).

Optimum target attainment was better with modeled dosing based on absolute lymphocyte counts than with weight-based dosing, the authors said.

The findings underscore the importance of optimum ATG dosing, as “survival after HCT is highly affected by ATG exposure after HCT,” and they suggest that survival chances may be improved with individualized dosing based on lymphocyte counts–a finding that requires assessment in a prospective study, they concluded.

This study was funded by the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research and the Queen Wilhelmina Fund for Cancer Research. Dr. Admiraal reported having no relevant disclosures.

[email protected]

Optimum antithymocyte globulin exposure after allogeneic hemopoietic cell transplantation (HTC) is associated with a higher probability of survival as a result of reductions in transplant-related and relapse-related deaths, based on findings from a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

The findings come from a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of data from 146 patients with acute lymphoid leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome. All were receiving their first T cell–repleted allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell HCT with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as part of their nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen. Based on hazard ratios for overall survival, nonrelapse mortality, and relapse-related mortality, the optimum range of ATG exposure was 60-95 arbitrary units per day/mL, Rick Admiraal, MD, of the University Medical Centre Utrecht, Netherlands, and his colleagues reported in the Lancet Haematology (Lancet Haematol. 2017 Apr;4[4]:e183-91).

The estimated 5-year survival was significantly greater with optimum ATG exposure than with below-optimum exposure (69% vs. 32%; hazard ratio, 2.41) or with above-optimum exposure (69% vs. 48%; hazard ratio, 2.11).

Optimum ATG exposure also was associated with a greater likelihood of event-free survival: The hazard ratio was 2.54 for those with below-optimum exposure and 1.83 for those with above-optimum exposure, the researchers said. Further, above-optimum exposure was associated with higher relapse-related mortality (hazard ratio, 2.66). Below-optimum exposure was associated with higher non-relapse mortality (hazard ratio, 4.36) as well as with a higher risk for grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (hazard ratio, 3.09), but not for chronic graft-versus-host disease (hazard ratio, 2.38).

Optimum target attainment was better with modeled dosing based on absolute lymphocyte counts than with weight-based dosing, the authors said.

The findings underscore the importance of optimum ATG dosing, as “survival after HCT is highly affected by ATG exposure after HCT,” and they suggest that survival chances may be improved with individualized dosing based on lymphocyte counts–a finding that requires assessment in a prospective study, they concluded.

This study was funded by the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research and the Queen Wilhelmina Fund for Cancer Research. Dr. Admiraal reported having no relevant disclosures.

[email protected]

Optimum antithymocyte globulin exposure after allogeneic hemopoietic cell transplantation (HTC) is associated with a higher probability of survival as a result of reductions in transplant-related and relapse-related deaths, based on findings from a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

The findings come from a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of data from 146 patients with acute lymphoid leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome. All were receiving their first T cell–repleted allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell HCT with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as part of their nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen. Based on hazard ratios for overall survival, nonrelapse mortality, and relapse-related mortality, the optimum range of ATG exposure was 60-95 arbitrary units per day/mL, Rick Admiraal, MD, of the University Medical Centre Utrecht, Netherlands, and his colleagues reported in the Lancet Haematology (Lancet Haematol. 2017 Apr;4[4]:e183-91).

The estimated 5-year survival was significantly greater with optimum ATG exposure than with below-optimum exposure (69% vs. 32%; hazard ratio, 2.41) or with above-optimum exposure (69% vs. 48%; hazard ratio, 2.11).

Optimum ATG exposure also was associated with a greater likelihood of event-free survival: The hazard ratio was 2.54 for those with below-optimum exposure and 1.83 for those with above-optimum exposure, the researchers said. Further, above-optimum exposure was associated with higher relapse-related mortality (hazard ratio, 2.66). Below-optimum exposure was associated with higher non-relapse mortality (hazard ratio, 4.36) as well as with a higher risk for grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (hazard ratio, 3.09), but not for chronic graft-versus-host disease (hazard ratio, 2.38).

Optimum target attainment was better with modeled dosing based on absolute lymphocyte counts than with weight-based dosing, the authors said.

The findings underscore the importance of optimum ATG dosing, as “survival after HCT is highly affected by ATG exposure after HCT,” and they suggest that survival chances may be improved with individualized dosing based on lymphocyte counts–a finding that requires assessment in a prospective study, they concluded.

This study was funded by the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research and the Queen Wilhelmina Fund for Cancer Research. Dr. Admiraal reported having no relevant disclosures.

[email protected]

ORLANDO – The use of the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc for 90 days is safe and effective for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation, according to findings from a phase II study.

An earlier study showed that CCR5 blockade using maraviroc for 33 days was associated with a low incidence of acute GVHD, as well as with absence of early liver and gut GVHD – although delayed severe cases of visceral GVHD still occurred.

The current study was performed because the prior findings raised concerns that brief blockade was insufficient for preventing GVHD over a longer period of time. The new findings show that an extended course may indeed provide additional benefits, Ran Reshef, MD, reported at the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

In 37 high-risk patients who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors using fludarabine/busulfan (Flu/Bu2) conditioning followed by peripheral blood stem cells, maraviroc was given at a dose of 300 mg twice daily, in addition to standard tacrolimus and methotrexate.

The 180-day rates of grade 2-4 and grade 3-4 acute GVHD (the primary endpoint of the study) in these patients were 27% and 5%, respectively. These rates were very similar to the 24% and 6% rates seen in the first study at 6 months after 30 days of maraviroc treatment, said Dr. Reshef of Columbia University Medical Center, New York.

The earlier results were “driven not so much by a reduction in the rates of skin GVHD, but by low rates of visceral GVHD of the gut and the liver – with a striking absence of gut and liver GVHD in the first 100 days,” he said.

Dr. Reshef also noted that the current study had a less favorable donor mix, as no matched related donors were included because of the earlier study’s very low rates of GVHD – with or without maraviroc – in those with related donors, who composed a third of donors.

Long-term follow-up of results from the earlier study, with comparison of a large contemporary control cohort, showed that “there is in fact an impact ... on grade 2-4 and grade 3-4 [GVHD], although the number of events is small, and the study was not powered enough to reach statistical significance,” Dr. Reshef said. The rates of chronic GVHD did not differ between the study subjects and contemporary controls, he noted.

At 100 days in the current study, there were no cases of liver GVHD, two cases of mild upper-GI GVHD, and one case of severe gut GVHD. At 1 year, the disease relapse rate was “fairly reasonable” at 30%, nonrelapse mortality was 12% with only one case of death from GVHD, and the incidence of chronic GVHD was 8%, which was significantly lower than in the prior study, he said.

The low rate of chronic GVHD led to a GVHD/relapse-free survival (GRFS) rate of 49%.

“To put this in context, the [Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research] data for reduced-intensity transplants ... have shown 25% for acute myeloid leukemia and 12% for myelodysplastic syndrome,” he said. “So, we feel that these are by far improved numbers, compared with this benchmark.”

To determine which patients develop GVHD despite chemotaxis blockade and why, Dr. Reshef and his colleagues developed a pharmacodynamic assay to assess the activity of maraviroc in fresh blood samples. They found that those with insufficient CCR5 blockade on day 0 were those with higher incidence of severe acute GVHD, nonrelapse mortality, GRFS, and overall survival.

The investigators performed pharmacokinetic analysis using combined data from both trials to improve understanding of why some patients have insufficient CCR5 blockade. This showed significant variability in day 0 trough of maraviroc among patients (median of 65 ng/mL, range 12-316 ng/mL); levels above the median were associated with a significantly lower incidence of acute grade 2-4 GVHD and a trend toward improved GRFS.

These studies of maraviroc, which was originally developed for the treatment of HIV infection, were done to test the belief that blocking lymphocyte migration might prevent GVHD without interfering with graft-versus-tumor activity. Based on the earlier findings, Dr. Reshef and his colleagues hypothesized that treatment up to day 90 would decrease the rate to less than 30%, from a historical rate of 52%.

Patients in the study were high risk by virtue of age (median, 64 years), HLA matching (matched unrelated, 84%; mismatched unrelated, 16%), and comorbidities (comorbidity index greater than 2 in 49%). Underlying diseases were acute leukemia (78%), myelodysplastic syndrome (16%), and myeloproliferative neoplasm and cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (3% each).

At a median follow-up of 21 months, the 3-month course of maraviroc was well tolerated. Eight patients did not complete treatment because of disease relapse (five patients), skin reaction (one patient), early infection-related death (one patient), or poor tolerance of oral drugs (one patient). Neutrophil, platelet, and T-cell engraftment were similar to historical controls, and rates of infections were also similar, Dr Reshef noted.

“To conclude, an extended course of maraviroc up to day 90 is feasible and safe in the majority of patients,” he said. “This study confirms the effect of CCR5 blockade on visceral GVHD. I’m still awaiting a randomized study to confirm that further.

“A long course of maraviroc does not necessarily affect the rates of acute GVHD, but may help reduce chronic GVHD and improve GRFS,” Dr. Reshef said. “We should look further into the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic variables.”

Dr. Reshef reported receiving research funding from Pfizer.

[email protected]

ORLANDO – The use of the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc for 90 days is safe and effective for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation, according to findings from a phase II study.

An earlier study showed that CCR5 blockade using maraviroc for 33 days was associated with a low incidence of acute GVHD, as well as with absence of early liver and gut GVHD – although delayed severe cases of visceral GVHD still occurred.

The current study was performed because the prior findings raised concerns that brief blockade was insufficient for preventing GVHD over a longer period of time. The new findings show that an extended course may indeed provide additional benefits, Ran Reshef, MD, reported at the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

In 37 high-risk patients who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors using fludarabine/busulfan (Flu/Bu2) conditioning followed by peripheral blood stem cells, maraviroc was given at a dose of 300 mg twice daily, in addition to standard tacrolimus and methotrexate.

The 180-day rates of grade 2-4 and grade 3-4 acute GVHD (the primary endpoint of the study) in these patients were 27% and 5%, respectively. These rates were very similar to the 24% and 6% rates seen in the first study at 6 months after 30 days of maraviroc treatment, said Dr. Reshef of Columbia University Medical Center, New York.

The earlier results were “driven not so much by a reduction in the rates of skin GVHD, but by low rates of visceral GVHD of the gut and the liver – with a striking absence of gut and liver GVHD in the first 100 days,” he said.

Dr. Reshef also noted that the current study had a less favorable donor mix, as no matched related donors were included because of the earlier study’s very low rates of GVHD – with or without maraviroc – in those with related donors, who composed a third of donors.

Long-term follow-up of results from the earlier study, with comparison of a large contemporary control cohort, showed that “there is in fact an impact ... on grade 2-4 and grade 3-4 [GVHD], although the number of events is small, and the study was not powered enough to reach statistical significance,” Dr. Reshef said. The rates of chronic GVHD did not differ between the study subjects and contemporary controls, he noted.

At 100 days in the current study, there were no cases of liver GVHD, two cases of mild upper-GI GVHD, and one case of severe gut GVHD. At 1 year, the disease relapse rate was “fairly reasonable” at 30%, nonrelapse mortality was 12% with only one case of death from GVHD, and the incidence of chronic GVHD was 8%, which was significantly lower than in the prior study, he said.

The low rate of chronic GVHD led to a GVHD/relapse-free survival (GRFS) rate of 49%.

“To put this in context, the [Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research] data for reduced-intensity transplants ... have shown 25% for acute myeloid leukemia and 12% for myelodysplastic syndrome,” he said. “So, we feel that these are by far improved numbers, compared with this benchmark.”

To determine which patients develop GVHD despite chemotaxis blockade and why, Dr. Reshef and his colleagues developed a pharmacodynamic assay to assess the activity of maraviroc in fresh blood samples. They found that those with insufficient CCR5 blockade on day 0 were those with higher incidence of severe acute GVHD, nonrelapse mortality, GRFS, and overall survival.

The investigators performed pharmacokinetic analysis using combined data from both trials to improve understanding of why some patients have insufficient CCR5 blockade. This showed significant variability in day 0 trough of maraviroc among patients (median of 65 ng/mL, range 12-316 ng/mL); levels above the median were associated with a significantly lower incidence of acute grade 2-4 GVHD and a trend toward improved GRFS.

These studies of maraviroc, which was originally developed for the treatment of HIV infection, were done to test the belief that blocking lymphocyte migration might prevent GVHD without interfering with graft-versus-tumor activity. Based on the earlier findings, Dr. Reshef and his colleagues hypothesized that treatment up to day 90 would decrease the rate to less than 30%, from a historical rate of 52%.

Patients in the study were high risk by virtue of age (median, 64 years), HLA matching (matched unrelated, 84%; mismatched unrelated, 16%), and comorbidities (comorbidity index greater than 2 in 49%). Underlying diseases were acute leukemia (78%), myelodysplastic syndrome (16%), and myeloproliferative neoplasm and cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (3% each).

At a median follow-up of 21 months, the 3-month course of maraviroc was well tolerated. Eight patients did not complete treatment because of disease relapse (five patients), skin reaction (one patient), early infection-related death (one patient), or poor tolerance of oral drugs (one patient). Neutrophil, platelet, and T-cell engraftment were similar to historical controls, and rates of infections were also similar, Dr Reshef noted.

“To conclude, an extended course of maraviroc up to day 90 is feasible and safe in the majority of patients,” he said. “This study confirms the effect of CCR5 blockade on visceral GVHD. I’m still awaiting a randomized study to confirm that further.

“A long course of maraviroc does not necessarily affect the rates of acute GVHD, but may help reduce chronic GVHD and improve GRFS,” Dr. Reshef said. “We should look further into the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic variables.”

Dr. Reshef reported receiving research funding from Pfizer.

[email protected]

ORLANDO – The use of the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc for 90 days is safe and effective for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation, according to findings from a phase II study.

An earlier study showed that CCR5 blockade using maraviroc for 33 days was associated with a low incidence of acute GVHD, as well as with absence of early liver and gut GVHD – although delayed severe cases of visceral GVHD still occurred.

The current study was performed because the prior findings raised concerns that brief blockade was insufficient for preventing GVHD over a longer period of time. The new findings show that an extended course may indeed provide additional benefits, Ran Reshef, MD, reported at the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

In 37 high-risk patients who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors using fludarabine/busulfan (Flu/Bu2) conditioning followed by peripheral blood stem cells, maraviroc was given at a dose of 300 mg twice daily, in addition to standard tacrolimus and methotrexate.

The 180-day rates of grade 2-4 and grade 3-4 acute GVHD (the primary endpoint of the study) in these patients were 27% and 5%, respectively. These rates were very similar to the 24% and 6% rates seen in the first study at 6 months after 30 days of maraviroc treatment, said Dr. Reshef of Columbia University Medical Center, New York.

The earlier results were “driven not so much by a reduction in the rates of skin GVHD, but by low rates of visceral GVHD of the gut and the liver – with a striking absence of gut and liver GVHD in the first 100 days,” he said.

Dr. Reshef also noted that the current study had a less favorable donor mix, as no matched related donors were included because of the earlier study’s very low rates of GVHD – with or without maraviroc – in those with related donors, who composed a third of donors.

Long-term follow-up of results from the earlier study, with comparison of a large contemporary control cohort, showed that “there is in fact an impact ... on grade 2-4 and grade 3-4 [GVHD], although the number of events is small, and the study was not powered enough to reach statistical significance,” Dr. Reshef said. The rates of chronic GVHD did not differ between the study subjects and contemporary controls, he noted.

At 100 days in the current study, there were no cases of liver GVHD, two cases of mild upper-GI GVHD, and one case of severe gut GVHD. At 1 year, the disease relapse rate was “fairly reasonable” at 30%, nonrelapse mortality was 12% with only one case of death from GVHD, and the incidence of chronic GVHD was 8%, which was significantly lower than in the prior study, he said.

The low rate of chronic GVHD led to a GVHD/relapse-free survival (GRFS) rate of 49%.

“To put this in context, the [Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research] data for reduced-intensity transplants ... have shown 25% for acute myeloid leukemia and 12% for myelodysplastic syndrome,” he said. “So, we feel that these are by far improved numbers, compared with this benchmark.”

To determine which patients develop GVHD despite chemotaxis blockade and why, Dr. Reshef and his colleagues developed a pharmacodynamic assay to assess the activity of maraviroc in fresh blood samples. They found that those with insufficient CCR5 blockade on day 0 were those with higher incidence of severe acute GVHD, nonrelapse mortality, GRFS, and overall survival.

The investigators performed pharmacokinetic analysis using combined data from both trials to improve understanding of why some patients have insufficient CCR5 blockade. This showed significant variability in day 0 trough of maraviroc among patients (median of 65 ng/mL, range 12-316 ng/mL); levels above the median were associated with a significantly lower incidence of acute grade 2-4 GVHD and a trend toward improved GRFS.

These studies of maraviroc, which was originally developed for the treatment of HIV infection, were done to test the belief that blocking lymphocyte migration might prevent GVHD without interfering with graft-versus-tumor activity. Based on the earlier findings, Dr. Reshef and his colleagues hypothesized that treatment up to day 90 would decrease the rate to less than 30%, from a historical rate of 52%.

Patients in the study were high risk by virtue of age (median, 64 years), HLA matching (matched unrelated, 84%; mismatched unrelated, 16%), and comorbidities (comorbidity index greater than 2 in 49%). Underlying diseases were acute leukemia (78%), myelodysplastic syndrome (16%), and myeloproliferative neoplasm and cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (3% each).

At a median follow-up of 21 months, the 3-month course of maraviroc was well tolerated. Eight patients did not complete treatment because of disease relapse (five patients), skin reaction (one patient), early infection-related death (one patient), or poor tolerance of oral drugs (one patient). Neutrophil, platelet, and T-cell engraftment were similar to historical controls, and rates of infections were also similar, Dr Reshef noted.

“To conclude, an extended course of maraviroc up to day 90 is feasible and safe in the majority of patients,” he said. “This study confirms the effect of CCR5 blockade on visceral GVHD. I’m still awaiting a randomized study to confirm that further.

“A long course of maraviroc does not necessarily affect the rates of acute GVHD, but may help reduce chronic GVHD and improve GRFS,” Dr. Reshef said. “We should look further into the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic variables.”

Dr. Reshef reported receiving research funding from Pfizer.

[email protected]

Public reporting of cardiac surgery outcomes has been a disruptive force in cardiology, and especially daunting in pediatric cardiac surgery because of low case volumes and rare mortality. To ensure that public reporting achieves its original goals – providing transparency to the patient care process, holding providers accountable, informing decision making for health care consumers, reducing costs, encouraging more efficient use of health system resources, and improving patient care and outcomes – further study that includes use of appropriate risk adjustment is needed, according to commentaries in the April issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

The journal asked two groups to provide perspective on a study Adam D. DeVore, MD, of Duke University in Durham, N.C., and his coauthors published last year (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;67:963-72). The study analyzed Medicare claims data from 2006 to 2012 for 37,829 hospitalizations for heart attack, 100,189 for heart failure (HF), and 79,076 for pneumonia. Dr. DeVore and his colleagues found readmission rates for the three conditions did not significantly improve after public reporting protocols were implemented in 2009. However, the study did show a significant decrease in ED visits and observation stays for those with HF: from 2.3% to –0.8% for the former (P = .007); and from 15% to 4% for the latter (P = .04).

Public reporting of cardiac surgery outcomes has been a disruptive force in cardiology, and especially daunting in pediatric cardiac surgery because of low case volumes and rare mortality. To ensure that public reporting achieves its original goals – providing transparency to the patient care process, holding providers accountable, informing decision making for health care consumers, reducing costs, encouraging more efficient use of health system resources, and improving patient care and outcomes – further study that includes use of appropriate risk adjustment is needed, according to commentaries in the April issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

The journal asked two groups to provide perspective on a study Adam D. DeVore, MD, of Duke University in Durham, N.C., and his coauthors published last year (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;67:963-72). The study analyzed Medicare claims data from 2006 to 2012 for 37,829 hospitalizations for heart attack, 100,189 for heart failure (HF), and 79,076 for pneumonia. Dr. DeVore and his colleagues found readmission rates for the three conditions did not significantly improve after public reporting protocols were implemented in 2009. However, the study did show a significant decrease in ED visits and observation stays for those with HF: from 2.3% to –0.8% for the former (P = .007); and from 15% to 4% for the latter (P = .04).

Public reporting of cardiac surgery outcomes has been a disruptive force in cardiology, and especially daunting in pediatric cardiac surgery because of low case volumes and rare mortality. To ensure that public reporting achieves its original goals – providing transparency to the patient care process, holding providers accountable, informing decision making for health care consumers, reducing costs, encouraging more efficient use of health system resources, and improving patient care and outcomes – further study that includes use of appropriate risk adjustment is needed, according to commentaries in the April issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

The journal asked two groups to provide perspective on a study Adam D. DeVore, MD, of Duke University in Durham, N.C., and his coauthors published last year (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;67:963-72). The study analyzed Medicare claims data from 2006 to 2012 for 37,829 hospitalizations for heart attack, 100,189 for heart failure (HF), and 79,076 for pneumonia. Dr. DeVore and his colleagues found readmission rates for the three conditions did not significantly improve after public reporting protocols were implemented in 2009. However, the study did show a significant decrease in ED visits and observation stays for those with HF: from 2.3% to –0.8% for the former (P = .007); and from 15% to 4% for the latter (P = .04).