Researcher at a computer

Credit: Darren Baker

A new study suggests that as many as a third of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) could be re-analyzed in ways that modify their conclusions.

The study also indicates that such re-analyses are extremely rare, due to many researchers’ unwillingness to share data.

“There is a real need for researchers to provide access to their raw data for others to analyze,” said John Ioannidis, MD, DSc, of the Stanford Prevention Research Center in California.

“Without this access, and possibly incentives to perform this work, there is increasing lack of trust in whether the results of published, randomized trials are credible and can be taken at face value.”

Dr Ioannidis and his colleagues used the MEDLINE database to evaluate re-analyses of RCTs and detailed their findings in JAMA. A related editorial is also available in the journal.

The team searched for articles written in English describing the re-analysis of raw data used in previously published RCTs. Meta-analyses were excluded from the study, as were studies testing a different hypothesis than the original trial.

The researchers screened nearly 3000 articles of potential interest and read the full text of 226. Of these, 37 were ultimately included in the study. Thirty-two of them had an overlap of at least 1 author from the original paper.

New conclusions

Thirteen of the re-analyses (35% of the total) came to conclusions that differed from those of the original trial with regard to who could benefit from the tested medication or intervention.

Three concluded that the patient population to treat should be different from the one recommended by the original study. One concluded that fewer patients should be treated. And the remaining 9 indicated that more patients should be treated.

The differences between the original RCTs and the re-analyses often occurred because the researchers conducting the re-analyses used different statistical or analytical methods, ways of defining outcomes, or ways of handling missing data.

For example, an RCT on the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices concluded that sclerotherapy reduced mortality but didn’t prevent rebleeding.

The re-analysis, which used a different statistical model of risk, suggested the treatment did prevent rebleeding but didn’t reduce mortality. The new conclusion suggested the intervention would be most appropriate for patients with rebleeding, rather than those at the highest risk of death from the condition.

Another study investigated the best way to deliver an erythropoiesis-stimulating medication to anemia patients by comparing a fixed dose administered once every 3 weeks with weight-based weekly dosing. In the re-analysis, the conclusion changed when investigators used an updated hemoglobin threshold level to determine when therapy should be initiated.

“The high proportion of re-analyses reaching different conclusions than the original papers may be partly an artifact,” Dr Ioannidis said. “By that I mean that, in the current environment, re-analyses that reach exactly the same results as the original would have great difficulty getting published.”

“However, making the raw data of trials available for re-analyses is essential not only for re-evaluating whether the original claims were correct, but also for using these data to perform additional analyses of interest and combined analyses.”

In this way, existing raw data could be used to explore new clinical questions and might occasionally eliminate the need to conduct new trials.

Researcher at a computer

Credit: Darren Baker

A new study suggests that as many as a third of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) could be re-analyzed in ways that modify their conclusions.

The study also indicates that such re-analyses are extremely rare, due to many researchers’ unwillingness to share data.

“There is a real need for researchers to provide access to their raw data for others to analyze,” said John Ioannidis, MD, DSc, of the Stanford Prevention Research Center in California.

“Without this access, and possibly incentives to perform this work, there is increasing lack of trust in whether the results of published, randomized trials are credible and can be taken at face value.”

Dr Ioannidis and his colleagues used the MEDLINE database to evaluate re-analyses of RCTs and detailed their findings in JAMA. A related editorial is also available in the journal.

The team searched for articles written in English describing the re-analysis of raw data used in previously published RCTs. Meta-analyses were excluded from the study, as were studies testing a different hypothesis than the original trial.

The researchers screened nearly 3000 articles of potential interest and read the full text of 226. Of these, 37 were ultimately included in the study. Thirty-two of them had an overlap of at least 1 author from the original paper.

New conclusions

Thirteen of the re-analyses (35% of the total) came to conclusions that differed from those of the original trial with regard to who could benefit from the tested medication or intervention.

Three concluded that the patient population to treat should be different from the one recommended by the original study. One concluded that fewer patients should be treated. And the remaining 9 indicated that more patients should be treated.

The differences between the original RCTs and the re-analyses often occurred because the researchers conducting the re-analyses used different statistical or analytical methods, ways of defining outcomes, or ways of handling missing data.

For example, an RCT on the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices concluded that sclerotherapy reduced mortality but didn’t prevent rebleeding.

The re-analysis, which used a different statistical model of risk, suggested the treatment did prevent rebleeding but didn’t reduce mortality. The new conclusion suggested the intervention would be most appropriate for patients with rebleeding, rather than those at the highest risk of death from the condition.

Another study investigated the best way to deliver an erythropoiesis-stimulating medication to anemia patients by comparing a fixed dose administered once every 3 weeks with weight-based weekly dosing. In the re-analysis, the conclusion changed when investigators used an updated hemoglobin threshold level to determine when therapy should be initiated.

“The high proportion of re-analyses reaching different conclusions than the original papers may be partly an artifact,” Dr Ioannidis said. “By that I mean that, in the current environment, re-analyses that reach exactly the same results as the original would have great difficulty getting published.”

“However, making the raw data of trials available for re-analyses is essential not only for re-evaluating whether the original claims were correct, but also for using these data to perform additional analyses of interest and combined analyses.”

In this way, existing raw data could be used to explore new clinical questions and might occasionally eliminate the need to conduct new trials.

Researcher at a computer

Credit: Darren Baker

A new study suggests that as many as a third of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) could be re-analyzed in ways that modify their conclusions.

The study also indicates that such re-analyses are extremely rare, due to many researchers’ unwillingness to share data.

“There is a real need for researchers to provide access to their raw data for others to analyze,” said John Ioannidis, MD, DSc, of the Stanford Prevention Research Center in California.

“Without this access, and possibly incentives to perform this work, there is increasing lack of trust in whether the results of published, randomized trials are credible and can be taken at face value.”

Dr Ioannidis and his colleagues used the MEDLINE database to evaluate re-analyses of RCTs and detailed their findings in JAMA. A related editorial is also available in the journal.

The team searched for articles written in English describing the re-analysis of raw data used in previously published RCTs. Meta-analyses were excluded from the study, as were studies testing a different hypothesis than the original trial.

The researchers screened nearly 3000 articles of potential interest and read the full text of 226. Of these, 37 were ultimately included in the study. Thirty-two of them had an overlap of at least 1 author from the original paper.

New conclusions

Thirteen of the re-analyses (35% of the total) came to conclusions that differed from those of the original trial with regard to who could benefit from the tested medication or intervention.

Three concluded that the patient population to treat should be different from the one recommended by the original study. One concluded that fewer patients should be treated. And the remaining 9 indicated that more patients should be treated.

The differences between the original RCTs and the re-analyses often occurred because the researchers conducting the re-analyses used different statistical or analytical methods, ways of defining outcomes, or ways of handling missing data.

For example, an RCT on the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices concluded that sclerotherapy reduced mortality but didn’t prevent rebleeding.

The re-analysis, which used a different statistical model of risk, suggested the treatment did prevent rebleeding but didn’t reduce mortality. The new conclusion suggested the intervention would be most appropriate for patients with rebleeding, rather than those at the highest risk of death from the condition.

Another study investigated the best way to deliver an erythropoiesis-stimulating medication to anemia patients by comparing a fixed dose administered once every 3 weeks with weight-based weekly dosing. In the re-analysis, the conclusion changed when investigators used an updated hemoglobin threshold level to determine when therapy should be initiated.

“The high proportion of re-analyses reaching different conclusions than the original papers may be partly an artifact,” Dr Ioannidis said. “By that I mean that, in the current environment, re-analyses that reach exactly the same results as the original would have great difficulty getting published.”

“However, making the raw data of trials available for re-analyses is essential not only for re-evaluating whether the original claims were correct, but also for using these data to perform additional analyses of interest and combined analyses.”

In this way, existing raw data could be used to explore new clinical questions and might occasionally eliminate the need to conduct new trials.

Vial of eculizumab (Soliris)

Credit: Globovision

The UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued a draft guidance recommending eculizumab (Soliris) to treat atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), despite the drug’s high cost.

NICE estimates that eculizumab will cost the National Health Service (NHS) up to £58 million in the first year, rising to £82 million after 5 years.

The drug is currently funded by NHS England through interim specialized commissioning arrangements.

Eculizumab is ‘breakthrough’ for aHUS

aHUS is an extremely rare but life-threatening disease that causes inflammation of blood vessels and the formation of blood clots throughout the body. Patients with aHUS are at constant risk of sudden and progressive damage to, and failure of, vital organs.

Roughly 10% to 15% of patients die in the initial, acute phase of aHUS. The majority of patients—up to 70%—develop end-stage kidney failure requiring dialysis. And 1 in 5 patients has aHUS affecting organs other than the kidneys, most commonly the brain or heart.

Eculizumab inhibits the disease by blocking pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory processes, which can lead to cellular damage in small blood vessels throughout the body, renal failure, and damage to other organs.

“Eculizumab radically improves the quality of life of the small number of people with aHUS,” said NICE Chief Executive Sir Andrew Dillon.

“From the available evidence and from the testimony of clinicians and patients, families, and carers, it is clear that eculizumab is a significant breakthrough in the management of aHUS. The drug offers people with the disease the possibility of avoiding end-stage renal failure, dialysis, and kidney transplantation, as well as other organ damage.”

Breakthrough comes with considerable cost

Eculizumab costs £3150 per 30 mL vial (excluding value-added tax). The net budget impact of eculizumab based on the developer’s predicted rate of uptake over a 5-year period is confidential.

However, to allow consultees and commentators to properly engage in the consultation process, NICE has prepared an illustration of the possible budget impact of eculizumab for aHUS, using information available in the public domain.

This is based on a treatment cost of £340,200 per adult patient in the first year (based on the acquisition cost of the drug and the recommended dosing for an adult), and assumes a patient cohort of 170, as estimated by NHS England in its interim commissioning policy.

If all of these adult patients with aHUS are treated with eculizumab, the budget impact for the first year would be £57.8 million.

If an additional 20 new patients are treated the following year (based on a worldwide incidence of 0.4 per million), the budget impact will rise to £62.5 million in year 2. That assumes all new patients are treated, and all existing patients continue to be treated at the maintenance cost of £327,600 per year.

Using the same assumptions, the budget impact will rise to £69 million in year 3 (190 existing and 20 new patients), £75 million in year 4 (210 existing and 20 new patients), and £82 million in year 5 (230 existing and 20 new patients).

Conditions of the recommendation

The expert committee advising NICE on eculizumab believes the budget impact of recommending the drug for aHUS in relation to the benefits it offers would be lower if the potential for dose adjustment and treatment discontinuation was taken into account, according to Sir Dillon.

“Therefore, the draft guidance recommends that eculizumab is funded only if important conditions are met,” he said. “These include coordinating the use of eculizumab through an expert center and putting in place systems for monitoring how many people are diagnosed with aHUS, how many receive the drug, at what dose, and for how long.”

“The program also needs to develop protocols for starting and stopping treatment with eculizumab for clinical reasons and introduce a research program to collect data to evaluate when stopping treatment or adjusting the dose of the drug might occur.”

Given that the budget impact of eculizumab for treating aHUS will be considerable, the draft guidance also recommends that NHS England and the drug’s developer, Alexion, should consider what opportunities might exist to reduce the overall cost of eculizumab to the NHS.

NICE has not yet issued final guidance to the NHS. These decisions may change after consultation. The public can comment on the preliminary recommendations, which will be available until midday on September 25.

Comments received during this consultation period will be considered by the advisory committee at its meeting in October and, following this meeting, the next draft guidance will be issued.

Vial of eculizumab (Soliris)

Credit: Globovision

The UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued a draft guidance recommending eculizumab (Soliris) to treat atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), despite the drug’s high cost.

NICE estimates that eculizumab will cost the National Health Service (NHS) up to £58 million in the first year, rising to £82 million after 5 years.

The drug is currently funded by NHS England through interim specialized commissioning arrangements.

Eculizumab is ‘breakthrough’ for aHUS

aHUS is an extremely rare but life-threatening disease that causes inflammation of blood vessels and the formation of blood clots throughout the body. Patients with aHUS are at constant risk of sudden and progressive damage to, and failure of, vital organs.

Roughly 10% to 15% of patients die in the initial, acute phase of aHUS. The majority of patients—up to 70%—develop end-stage kidney failure requiring dialysis. And 1 in 5 patients has aHUS affecting organs other than the kidneys, most commonly the brain or heart.

Eculizumab inhibits the disease by blocking pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory processes, which can lead to cellular damage in small blood vessels throughout the body, renal failure, and damage to other organs.

“Eculizumab radically improves the quality of life of the small number of people with aHUS,” said NICE Chief Executive Sir Andrew Dillon.

“From the available evidence and from the testimony of clinicians and patients, families, and carers, it is clear that eculizumab is a significant breakthrough in the management of aHUS. The drug offers people with the disease the possibility of avoiding end-stage renal failure, dialysis, and kidney transplantation, as well as other organ damage.”

Breakthrough comes with considerable cost

Eculizumab costs £3150 per 30 mL vial (excluding value-added tax). The net budget impact of eculizumab based on the developer’s predicted rate of uptake over a 5-year period is confidential.

However, to allow consultees and commentators to properly engage in the consultation process, NICE has prepared an illustration of the possible budget impact of eculizumab for aHUS, using information available in the public domain.

This is based on a treatment cost of £340,200 per adult patient in the first year (based on the acquisition cost of the drug and the recommended dosing for an adult), and assumes a patient cohort of 170, as estimated by NHS England in its interim commissioning policy.

If all of these adult patients with aHUS are treated with eculizumab, the budget impact for the first year would be £57.8 million.

If an additional 20 new patients are treated the following year (based on a worldwide incidence of 0.4 per million), the budget impact will rise to £62.5 million in year 2. That assumes all new patients are treated, and all existing patients continue to be treated at the maintenance cost of £327,600 per year.

Using the same assumptions, the budget impact will rise to £69 million in year 3 (190 existing and 20 new patients), £75 million in year 4 (210 existing and 20 new patients), and £82 million in year 5 (230 existing and 20 new patients).

Conditions of the recommendation

The expert committee advising NICE on eculizumab believes the budget impact of recommending the drug for aHUS in relation to the benefits it offers would be lower if the potential for dose adjustment and treatment discontinuation was taken into account, according to Sir Dillon.

“Therefore, the draft guidance recommends that eculizumab is funded only if important conditions are met,” he said. “These include coordinating the use of eculizumab through an expert center and putting in place systems for monitoring how many people are diagnosed with aHUS, how many receive the drug, at what dose, and for how long.”

“The program also needs to develop protocols for starting and stopping treatment with eculizumab for clinical reasons and introduce a research program to collect data to evaluate when stopping treatment or adjusting the dose of the drug might occur.”

Given that the budget impact of eculizumab for treating aHUS will be considerable, the draft guidance also recommends that NHS England and the drug’s developer, Alexion, should consider what opportunities might exist to reduce the overall cost of eculizumab to the NHS.

NICE has not yet issued final guidance to the NHS. These decisions may change after consultation. The public can comment on the preliminary recommendations, which will be available until midday on September 25.

Comments received during this consultation period will be considered by the advisory committee at its meeting in October and, following this meeting, the next draft guidance will be issued.

Vial of eculizumab (Soliris)

Credit: Globovision

The UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued a draft guidance recommending eculizumab (Soliris) to treat atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), despite the drug’s high cost.

NICE estimates that eculizumab will cost the National Health Service (NHS) up to £58 million in the first year, rising to £82 million after 5 years.

The drug is currently funded by NHS England through interim specialized commissioning arrangements.

Eculizumab is ‘breakthrough’ for aHUS

aHUS is an extremely rare but life-threatening disease that causes inflammation of blood vessels and the formation of blood clots throughout the body. Patients with aHUS are at constant risk of sudden and progressive damage to, and failure of, vital organs.

Roughly 10% to 15% of patients die in the initial, acute phase of aHUS. The majority of patients—up to 70%—develop end-stage kidney failure requiring dialysis. And 1 in 5 patients has aHUS affecting organs other than the kidneys, most commonly the brain or heart.

Eculizumab inhibits the disease by blocking pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory processes, which can lead to cellular damage in small blood vessels throughout the body, renal failure, and damage to other organs.

“Eculizumab radically improves the quality of life of the small number of people with aHUS,” said NICE Chief Executive Sir Andrew Dillon.

“From the available evidence and from the testimony of clinicians and patients, families, and carers, it is clear that eculizumab is a significant breakthrough in the management of aHUS. The drug offers people with the disease the possibility of avoiding end-stage renal failure, dialysis, and kidney transplantation, as well as other organ damage.”

Breakthrough comes with considerable cost

Eculizumab costs £3150 per 30 mL vial (excluding value-added tax). The net budget impact of eculizumab based on the developer’s predicted rate of uptake over a 5-year period is confidential.

However, to allow consultees and commentators to properly engage in the consultation process, NICE has prepared an illustration of the possible budget impact of eculizumab for aHUS, using information available in the public domain.

This is based on a treatment cost of £340,200 per adult patient in the first year (based on the acquisition cost of the drug and the recommended dosing for an adult), and assumes a patient cohort of 170, as estimated by NHS England in its interim commissioning policy.

If all of these adult patients with aHUS are treated with eculizumab, the budget impact for the first year would be £57.8 million.

If an additional 20 new patients are treated the following year (based on a worldwide incidence of 0.4 per million), the budget impact will rise to £62.5 million in year 2. That assumes all new patients are treated, and all existing patients continue to be treated at the maintenance cost of £327,600 per year.

Using the same assumptions, the budget impact will rise to £69 million in year 3 (190 existing and 20 new patients), £75 million in year 4 (210 existing and 20 new patients), and £82 million in year 5 (230 existing and 20 new patients).

Conditions of the recommendation

The expert committee advising NICE on eculizumab believes the budget impact of recommending the drug for aHUS in relation to the benefits it offers would be lower if the potential for dose adjustment and treatment discontinuation was taken into account, according to Sir Dillon.

“Therefore, the draft guidance recommends that eculizumab is funded only if important conditions are met,” he said. “These include coordinating the use of eculizumab through an expert center and putting in place systems for monitoring how many people are diagnosed with aHUS, how many receive the drug, at what dose, and for how long.”

“The program also needs to develop protocols for starting and stopping treatment with eculizumab for clinical reasons and introduce a research program to collect data to evaluate when stopping treatment or adjusting the dose of the drug might occur.”

Given that the budget impact of eculizumab for treating aHUS will be considerable, the draft guidance also recommends that NHS England and the drug’s developer, Alexion, should consider what opportunities might exist to reduce the overall cost of eculizumab to the NHS.

NICE has not yet issued final guidance to the NHS. These decisions may change after consultation. The public can comment on the preliminary recommendations, which will be available until midday on September 25.

Comments received during this consultation period will be considered by the advisory committee at its meeting in October and, following this meeting, the next draft guidance will be issued.

Doctor with SCD patient

Credit: St Jude Children’s

Research Hospital

A new set of guidelines includes some strong recommendations for managing patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) that are not supported by high-quality evidence, according to researchers.

The group reviewed the medical literature to examine the quality of evidence supporting each of the guideline’s recommendations.

And they discovered a lack of randomized controlled trials in SCD patients that have left “extensive” gaps in our knowledge of the disease.

So while the guidelines do provide some helpful advice for managing patients with SCD, they also leave healthcare professionals with some uncertainties, according to the researchers.

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened an expert panel to develop the guidelines, which are now available on the institute’s website.

Barbara P. Yawn, MD, of the Olmsted Medical Center in Rochester, Minnesota, and her colleagues examined the quality of evidence supporting the guidelines and reported their results in JAMA alongside a related editorial. Several examples of guideline recommendations and supporting evidence follow.

Health management recommendations

The guidelines strongly recommend oral penicillin prophylaxis twice daily until age 5 years in all children with HbSS to prevent invasive pneumococcal infection. And this recommendation is supported by moderate-quality evidence.

But the guidelines also strongly recommend referral to an ophthalmologist for dilated eye examination to screen for retinopathy beginning at age 10 years, and the quality of evidence supporting this recommendation is poor.

Acute SCD complications

The guidelines strongly recommend rapid initiation of parenteral opioids in adults and children with a vaso-occlusive crisis associated with severe pain, a suggestion supported by high-quality evidence.

However, the guidelines also strongly recommend treating SCD patients with acute chest syndrome with an intravenous cephalosporin, an oral macrolide antibiotic, and supplemental oxygen (to maintain oxygen saturation of >95%), as well as closely monitoring patients for bronchospasm, acute anemia, and hypoxemia. And this is supported by low-quality evidence.

Chronic complications

A strong recommendation supported by high-quality evidence is to treat avascular necrosis with analgesics and consult physical therapy and orthopedic departments for assessment and follow-up.

A strong recommendation supported by low-quality evidence is to evaluate all children and adults with SCD and intermittent or chronic hip pain for avascular necrosis by history, physical examination, radiography, and magnetic resonance imaging, as needed.

Use of hydroxyurea

Dr Yawn and her colleagues found that strong recommendations for hydroxyurea are all supported by moderate- or high-quality evidence.

A strong recommendation supported by high-quality evidence is to initiate hydroxyurea in adults who have at least 3 moderate-to-severe pain crises associated with SCD during a 12-month period.

A strong recommendation supported by moderate-quality evidence is to initiate hydroxyurea in adults who have sickle cell-associated pain that interferes with daily activities and quality of life.

Transfusion therapy

For this category, the only strong recommendation supported by high-quality evidence is to transfuse a child with a transcranial Doppler reading greater than 200 cm/s.

The guidelines strongly recommend transfusing red blood cells in adults and children with SCD to bring the hemoglobin level to 10 g/dL prior to undergoing a surgical procedure involving general anesthesia, but this is supported by moderate-quality evidence.

A strong recommendation supported by low-quality evidence is to perform an exchange transfusion in a patient with symptomatic, severe acute chest syndrome (defined by an oxygen saturation less than 90% despite supplemental oxygen).

Conclusions

Dr Yawn and her colleagues said this investigation confirms that developing guidelines for managing SCD is challenging because high-quality evidence is limited in virtually every area related to SCD management.

Therefore, the guidelines leave healthcare professionals with some uncertainties about managing SCD patients. But the researchers hope their analysis will prompt new research that might provide more definitive guidance.

Doctor with SCD patient

Credit: St Jude Children’s

Research Hospital

A new set of guidelines includes some strong recommendations for managing patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) that are not supported by high-quality evidence, according to researchers.

The group reviewed the medical literature to examine the quality of evidence supporting each of the guideline’s recommendations.

And they discovered a lack of randomized controlled trials in SCD patients that have left “extensive” gaps in our knowledge of the disease.

So while the guidelines do provide some helpful advice for managing patients with SCD, they also leave healthcare professionals with some uncertainties, according to the researchers.

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened an expert panel to develop the guidelines, which are now available on the institute’s website.

Barbara P. Yawn, MD, of the Olmsted Medical Center in Rochester, Minnesota, and her colleagues examined the quality of evidence supporting the guidelines and reported their results in JAMA alongside a related editorial. Several examples of guideline recommendations and supporting evidence follow.

Health management recommendations

The guidelines strongly recommend oral penicillin prophylaxis twice daily until age 5 years in all children with HbSS to prevent invasive pneumococcal infection. And this recommendation is supported by moderate-quality evidence.

But the guidelines also strongly recommend referral to an ophthalmologist for dilated eye examination to screen for retinopathy beginning at age 10 years, and the quality of evidence supporting this recommendation is poor.

Acute SCD complications

The guidelines strongly recommend rapid initiation of parenteral opioids in adults and children with a vaso-occlusive crisis associated with severe pain, a suggestion supported by high-quality evidence.

However, the guidelines also strongly recommend treating SCD patients with acute chest syndrome with an intravenous cephalosporin, an oral macrolide antibiotic, and supplemental oxygen (to maintain oxygen saturation of >95%), as well as closely monitoring patients for bronchospasm, acute anemia, and hypoxemia. And this is supported by low-quality evidence.

Chronic complications

A strong recommendation supported by high-quality evidence is to treat avascular necrosis with analgesics and consult physical therapy and orthopedic departments for assessment and follow-up.

A strong recommendation supported by low-quality evidence is to evaluate all children and adults with SCD and intermittent or chronic hip pain for avascular necrosis by history, physical examination, radiography, and magnetic resonance imaging, as needed.

Use of hydroxyurea

Dr Yawn and her colleagues found that strong recommendations for hydroxyurea are all supported by moderate- or high-quality evidence.

A strong recommendation supported by high-quality evidence is to initiate hydroxyurea in adults who have at least 3 moderate-to-severe pain crises associated with SCD during a 12-month period.

A strong recommendation supported by moderate-quality evidence is to initiate hydroxyurea in adults who have sickle cell-associated pain that interferes with daily activities and quality of life.

Transfusion therapy

For this category, the only strong recommendation supported by high-quality evidence is to transfuse a child with a transcranial Doppler reading greater than 200 cm/s.

The guidelines strongly recommend transfusing red blood cells in adults and children with SCD to bring the hemoglobin level to 10 g/dL prior to undergoing a surgical procedure involving general anesthesia, but this is supported by moderate-quality evidence.

A strong recommendation supported by low-quality evidence is to perform an exchange transfusion in a patient with symptomatic, severe acute chest syndrome (defined by an oxygen saturation less than 90% despite supplemental oxygen).

Conclusions

Dr Yawn and her colleagues said this investigation confirms that developing guidelines for managing SCD is challenging because high-quality evidence is limited in virtually every area related to SCD management.

Therefore, the guidelines leave healthcare professionals with some uncertainties about managing SCD patients. But the researchers hope their analysis will prompt new research that might provide more definitive guidance.

Doctor with SCD patient

Credit: St Jude Children’s

Research Hospital

A new set of guidelines includes some strong recommendations for managing patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) that are not supported by high-quality evidence, according to researchers.

The group reviewed the medical literature to examine the quality of evidence supporting each of the guideline’s recommendations.

And they discovered a lack of randomized controlled trials in SCD patients that have left “extensive” gaps in our knowledge of the disease.

So while the guidelines do provide some helpful advice for managing patients with SCD, they also leave healthcare professionals with some uncertainties, according to the researchers.

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened an expert panel to develop the guidelines, which are now available on the institute’s website.

Barbara P. Yawn, MD, of the Olmsted Medical Center in Rochester, Minnesota, and her colleagues examined the quality of evidence supporting the guidelines and reported their results in JAMA alongside a related editorial. Several examples of guideline recommendations and supporting evidence follow.

Health management recommendations

The guidelines strongly recommend oral penicillin prophylaxis twice daily until age 5 years in all children with HbSS to prevent invasive pneumococcal infection. And this recommendation is supported by moderate-quality evidence.

But the guidelines also strongly recommend referral to an ophthalmologist for dilated eye examination to screen for retinopathy beginning at age 10 years, and the quality of evidence supporting this recommendation is poor.

Acute SCD complications

The guidelines strongly recommend rapid initiation of parenteral opioids in adults and children with a vaso-occlusive crisis associated with severe pain, a suggestion supported by high-quality evidence.

However, the guidelines also strongly recommend treating SCD patients with acute chest syndrome with an intravenous cephalosporin, an oral macrolide antibiotic, and supplemental oxygen (to maintain oxygen saturation of >95%), as well as closely monitoring patients for bronchospasm, acute anemia, and hypoxemia. And this is supported by low-quality evidence.

Chronic complications

A strong recommendation supported by high-quality evidence is to treat avascular necrosis with analgesics and consult physical therapy and orthopedic departments for assessment and follow-up.

A strong recommendation supported by low-quality evidence is to evaluate all children and adults with SCD and intermittent or chronic hip pain for avascular necrosis by history, physical examination, radiography, and magnetic resonance imaging, as needed.

Use of hydroxyurea

Dr Yawn and her colleagues found that strong recommendations for hydroxyurea are all supported by moderate- or high-quality evidence.

A strong recommendation supported by high-quality evidence is to initiate hydroxyurea in adults who have at least 3 moderate-to-severe pain crises associated with SCD during a 12-month period.

A strong recommendation supported by moderate-quality evidence is to initiate hydroxyurea in adults who have sickle cell-associated pain that interferes with daily activities and quality of life.

Transfusion therapy

For this category, the only strong recommendation supported by high-quality evidence is to transfuse a child with a transcranial Doppler reading greater than 200 cm/s.

The guidelines strongly recommend transfusing red blood cells in adults and children with SCD to bring the hemoglobin level to 10 g/dL prior to undergoing a surgical procedure involving general anesthesia, but this is supported by moderate-quality evidence.

A strong recommendation supported by low-quality evidence is to perform an exchange transfusion in a patient with symptomatic, severe acute chest syndrome (defined by an oxygen saturation less than 90% despite supplemental oxygen).

Conclusions

Dr Yawn and her colleagues said this investigation confirms that developing guidelines for managing SCD is challenging because high-quality evidence is limited in virtually every area related to SCD management.

Therefore, the guidelines leave healthcare professionals with some uncertainties about managing SCD patients. But the researchers hope their analysis will prompt new research that might provide more definitive guidance.

Contrary to expectations, statin use before the development of type II diabetes did not worsen microvascular complications such as retinopathy, neuropathy, and gangrene of the foot.

In fact, despite concerns that statins have been seen to increase glucose levels and the risk of diabetes development, they may provide a protective effect from these conditions in newly developed diabetic patients, according to an analysis of data from more than 60,000 individuals in the Danish Patient Registry.

Copyright National Eye Institute

"The cumulative incidences of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, and gangrene were reduced in statin users compared with non–statin users, but [the] risk of diabetic nephropathy was similar for all patients with diabetes," stated Dr. Sune F. Nielsen, Ph.D., and Dr. Børge G. Nordestgaard of the Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital. However, they did find that statin use, as previously seen, did significantly increase the risk of developing diabetes in the first place. Their study was published online Sept. 10 in the Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (2014 Sept. 10 [doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70173-1]).

The researchers performed a nested matched study of all men and women living in Denmark who were diagnosed with incident diabetes during 1996-2009 at age 40 years or older, and assessed their outcomes through use of the Danish Civil Registration System, the Danish Patient Registry, and the Danish Registry of Medicinal Product Statistics. After exclusions, 62,716 patients with diabetes were randomly selected for the study: 15,679 statin users and 47,037 non–statin users. The primary outcome was the incidence of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic nephropathy, and gangrene of the foot. The design "captured 100% of individuals in Denmark who had ever used a statin within the time frame of the study."

Follow-up was censored at date of death for 9,560 individuals. During 215,725 person-years of follow-up, diabetic retinopathy was recorded in 2,866 patients, diabetic neuropathy in 1,406, diabetic nephropathy in 1,248, and gangrene of the foot in 2,392.

Over a median follow-up of 2.7 years, statin users were significantly less likely to be diagnosed with diabetic neuropathy (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.75: P less than .0001) and diabetic retinopathy (HR, 0.60; 95% CI 0.54-0.66: P less than .0001) than were those who had not received statins. However, no difference was noted in the incidence of diabetic nephropathy (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85-1.10; P = .62).

In contrast, the researchers found that statin use significantly increased the risk of developing diabetes in people who did not have the disease when the study began. When they compared a random selection of 272,994 non–statin users with 90,998 statin users, the multivariable adjusted hazard ratio for the risk of developing diabetes was 1.17 (95% CI, 1.14-1.21). These results are similar to those seen in previous randomized studies of statin use.

"In conclusion, we found no evidence that statin use is associated with an increased risk of microvascular disease; this result is important and clinically reassuring on its own. Whether or not statins are protective against some forms of microvascular disease, a possibility raised by these data, and by which mechanism, will need to be addressed in studies similar to ours, or in Mendelian randomization studies," said Dr. Nielsen and Dr. Nordestgaard. "Ideally, however, this question should be addressed in the setting of a randomized controlled trial," they added.

Dr. Nordestgaard has received consultancy fees or lecture honoraria from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Merck, and Dr. Nielsen declared no competing interests. The work was supported by Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital.

[email protected]

Contrary to expectations, statin use before the development of type II diabetes did not worsen microvascular complications such as retinopathy, neuropathy, and gangrene of the foot.

In fact, despite concerns that statins have been seen to increase glucose levels and the risk of diabetes development, they may provide a protective effect from these conditions in newly developed diabetic patients, according to an analysis of data from more than 60,000 individuals in the Danish Patient Registry.

Copyright National Eye Institute

"The cumulative incidences of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, and gangrene were reduced in statin users compared with non–statin users, but [the] risk of diabetic nephropathy was similar for all patients with diabetes," stated Dr. Sune F. Nielsen, Ph.D., and Dr. Børge G. Nordestgaard of the Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital. However, they did find that statin use, as previously seen, did significantly increase the risk of developing diabetes in the first place. Their study was published online Sept. 10 in the Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (2014 Sept. 10 [doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70173-1]).

The researchers performed a nested matched study of all men and women living in Denmark who were diagnosed with incident diabetes during 1996-2009 at age 40 years or older, and assessed their outcomes through use of the Danish Civil Registration System, the Danish Patient Registry, and the Danish Registry of Medicinal Product Statistics. After exclusions, 62,716 patients with diabetes were randomly selected for the study: 15,679 statin users and 47,037 non–statin users. The primary outcome was the incidence of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic nephropathy, and gangrene of the foot. The design "captured 100% of individuals in Denmark who had ever used a statin within the time frame of the study."

Follow-up was censored at date of death for 9,560 individuals. During 215,725 person-years of follow-up, diabetic retinopathy was recorded in 2,866 patients, diabetic neuropathy in 1,406, diabetic nephropathy in 1,248, and gangrene of the foot in 2,392.

Over a median follow-up of 2.7 years, statin users were significantly less likely to be diagnosed with diabetic neuropathy (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.75: P less than .0001) and diabetic retinopathy (HR, 0.60; 95% CI 0.54-0.66: P less than .0001) than were those who had not received statins. However, no difference was noted in the incidence of diabetic nephropathy (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85-1.10; P = .62).

In contrast, the researchers found that statin use significantly increased the risk of developing diabetes in people who did not have the disease when the study began. When they compared a random selection of 272,994 non–statin users with 90,998 statin users, the multivariable adjusted hazard ratio for the risk of developing diabetes was 1.17 (95% CI, 1.14-1.21). These results are similar to those seen in previous randomized studies of statin use.

"In conclusion, we found no evidence that statin use is associated with an increased risk of microvascular disease; this result is important and clinically reassuring on its own. Whether or not statins are protective against some forms of microvascular disease, a possibility raised by these data, and by which mechanism, will need to be addressed in studies similar to ours, or in Mendelian randomization studies," said Dr. Nielsen and Dr. Nordestgaard. "Ideally, however, this question should be addressed in the setting of a randomized controlled trial," they added.

Dr. Nordestgaard has received consultancy fees or lecture honoraria from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Merck, and Dr. Nielsen declared no competing interests. The work was supported by Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital.

[email protected]

Contrary to expectations, statin use before the development of type II diabetes did not worsen microvascular complications such as retinopathy, neuropathy, and gangrene of the foot.

In fact, despite concerns that statins have been seen to increase glucose levels and the risk of diabetes development, they may provide a protective effect from these conditions in newly developed diabetic patients, according to an analysis of data from more than 60,000 individuals in the Danish Patient Registry.

Copyright National Eye Institute

"The cumulative incidences of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, and gangrene were reduced in statin users compared with non–statin users, but [the] risk of diabetic nephropathy was similar for all patients with diabetes," stated Dr. Sune F. Nielsen, Ph.D., and Dr. Børge G. Nordestgaard of the Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital. However, they did find that statin use, as previously seen, did significantly increase the risk of developing diabetes in the first place. Their study was published online Sept. 10 in the Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (2014 Sept. 10 [doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70173-1]).

The researchers performed a nested matched study of all men and women living in Denmark who were diagnosed with incident diabetes during 1996-2009 at age 40 years or older, and assessed their outcomes through use of the Danish Civil Registration System, the Danish Patient Registry, and the Danish Registry of Medicinal Product Statistics. After exclusions, 62,716 patients with diabetes were randomly selected for the study: 15,679 statin users and 47,037 non–statin users. The primary outcome was the incidence of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic nephropathy, and gangrene of the foot. The design "captured 100% of individuals in Denmark who had ever used a statin within the time frame of the study."

Follow-up was censored at date of death for 9,560 individuals. During 215,725 person-years of follow-up, diabetic retinopathy was recorded in 2,866 patients, diabetic neuropathy in 1,406, diabetic nephropathy in 1,248, and gangrene of the foot in 2,392.

Over a median follow-up of 2.7 years, statin users were significantly less likely to be diagnosed with diabetic neuropathy (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.75: P less than .0001) and diabetic retinopathy (HR, 0.60; 95% CI 0.54-0.66: P less than .0001) than were those who had not received statins. However, no difference was noted in the incidence of diabetic nephropathy (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85-1.10; P = .62).

In contrast, the researchers found that statin use significantly increased the risk of developing diabetes in people who did not have the disease when the study began. When they compared a random selection of 272,994 non–statin users with 90,998 statin users, the multivariable adjusted hazard ratio for the risk of developing diabetes was 1.17 (95% CI, 1.14-1.21). These results are similar to those seen in previous randomized studies of statin use.

"In conclusion, we found no evidence that statin use is associated with an increased risk of microvascular disease; this result is important and clinically reassuring on its own. Whether or not statins are protective against some forms of microvascular disease, a possibility raised by these data, and by which mechanism, will need to be addressed in studies similar to ours, or in Mendelian randomization studies," said Dr. Nielsen and Dr. Nordestgaard. "Ideally, however, this question should be addressed in the setting of a randomized controlled trial," they added.

Dr. Nordestgaard has received consultancy fees or lecture honoraria from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Merck, and Dr. Nielsen declared no competing interests. The work was supported by Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital.

[email protected]

The "much anticipated" guideline to help primary care and emergency clinicians improve the management of sickle cell disease includes a consensus treatment protocol for implementing hydroxyurea therapy and more detailed guidance regarding long-term transfusion therapy, according to a summary report published online September 9 in Journal of the American Medical Association.

Sickle cell disease (SCD), a life-threatening genetically transmitted disorder affecting 70,000-100,000 Americans, is associated with a wide array of complex acute and chronic complications that require immediate medical attention. But high-quality data on which to base management decisions are sorely lacking, and clinicians get little in the way of guidance from existing recommendations. One result is that "the two most widely available disease-modifying therapies, hydroxyurea and long-term transfusions, are underused, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the only curative approach, has been used in only a small proportion of affected individuals," said Dr. Barbara P. Yawn and her associates on the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute expert panel that issued the summary report.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/National Human Genome Research Institute/Creative Commons License

Even this guideline is somewhat rudimentary due to the dearth of good data "in virtually every area related to SCD management," and cannot help but leave "many uncertainties for health professionals caring for individuals with SCD." But it is hoped that this guideline will furnish a critical foundation for future research and will now begin "to facilitate improved and more accessible care for all affected individuals," said Dr. Yawn, director of research at Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, Minn., and her associates.

The guideline is based on an extensive literature review of more than 13,000 abstracts and articles, which was winnowed to 1,583 original studies regarding SCD. From this, a team of health care professionals in family medicine, internal medicine, pediatric and adult hematology, psychiatry and mental health, transfusion medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, maternal/fetal medicine, and emergency department nursing compiled the guideline as well as the summary, entitled Evidence-Based Management of Sickle Cell Disease: Expert Panel Report 2014 (JAMA 2014 September 9 [doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10517]).

In addition to establishing a protocol for implementing hydroxyurea therapy, the guideline addresses changes in pneumococcal vaccination recommendations for adults and children; annual transcranial Doppler screening coupled with long-term transfusion therapy when necessary to prevent stroke in children aged 2-16 years; rapid initiation of opioids for severe pain during vasoocclusive crises; analgesics and physical therapy for avascular necrosis; ACE inhibitor treatment for adults with microalbuminuria; referral to specialists for screening and treatment of proliferative retinopathy; echocardiography to assess signs of pulmonary hypertension; and monitoring for iron overload in patients receiving transfusion therapy.

Both the summary report and the full guideline are available at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/sickle-cell-disease-guidelines/.

The "much anticipated" guideline to help primary care and emergency clinicians improve the management of sickle cell disease includes a consensus treatment protocol for implementing hydroxyurea therapy and more detailed guidance regarding long-term transfusion therapy, according to a summary report published online September 9 in Journal of the American Medical Association.

Sickle cell disease (SCD), a life-threatening genetically transmitted disorder affecting 70,000-100,000 Americans, is associated with a wide array of complex acute and chronic complications that require immediate medical attention. But high-quality data on which to base management decisions are sorely lacking, and clinicians get little in the way of guidance from existing recommendations. One result is that "the two most widely available disease-modifying therapies, hydroxyurea and long-term transfusions, are underused, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the only curative approach, has been used in only a small proportion of affected individuals," said Dr. Barbara P. Yawn and her associates on the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute expert panel that issued the summary report.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/National Human Genome Research Institute/Creative Commons License

Even this guideline is somewhat rudimentary due to the dearth of good data "in virtually every area related to SCD management," and cannot help but leave "many uncertainties for health professionals caring for individuals with SCD." But it is hoped that this guideline will furnish a critical foundation for future research and will now begin "to facilitate improved and more accessible care for all affected individuals," said Dr. Yawn, director of research at Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, Minn., and her associates.

The guideline is based on an extensive literature review of more than 13,000 abstracts and articles, which was winnowed to 1,583 original studies regarding SCD. From this, a team of health care professionals in family medicine, internal medicine, pediatric and adult hematology, psychiatry and mental health, transfusion medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, maternal/fetal medicine, and emergency department nursing compiled the guideline as well as the summary, entitled Evidence-Based Management of Sickle Cell Disease: Expert Panel Report 2014 (JAMA 2014 September 9 [doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10517]).

In addition to establishing a protocol for implementing hydroxyurea therapy, the guideline addresses changes in pneumococcal vaccination recommendations for adults and children; annual transcranial Doppler screening coupled with long-term transfusion therapy when necessary to prevent stroke in children aged 2-16 years; rapid initiation of opioids for severe pain during vasoocclusive crises; analgesics and physical therapy for avascular necrosis; ACE inhibitor treatment for adults with microalbuminuria; referral to specialists for screening and treatment of proliferative retinopathy; echocardiography to assess signs of pulmonary hypertension; and monitoring for iron overload in patients receiving transfusion therapy.

Both the summary report and the full guideline are available at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/sickle-cell-disease-guidelines/.

The "much anticipated" guideline to help primary care and emergency clinicians improve the management of sickle cell disease includes a consensus treatment protocol for implementing hydroxyurea therapy and more detailed guidance regarding long-term transfusion therapy, according to a summary report published online September 9 in Journal of the American Medical Association.

Sickle cell disease (SCD), a life-threatening genetically transmitted disorder affecting 70,000-100,000 Americans, is associated with a wide array of complex acute and chronic complications that require immediate medical attention. But high-quality data on which to base management decisions are sorely lacking, and clinicians get little in the way of guidance from existing recommendations. One result is that "the two most widely available disease-modifying therapies, hydroxyurea and long-term transfusions, are underused, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the only curative approach, has been used in only a small proportion of affected individuals," said Dr. Barbara P. Yawn and her associates on the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute expert panel that issued the summary report.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/National Human Genome Research Institute/Creative Commons License

Even this guideline is somewhat rudimentary due to the dearth of good data "in virtually every area related to SCD management," and cannot help but leave "many uncertainties for health professionals caring for individuals with SCD." But it is hoped that this guideline will furnish a critical foundation for future research and will now begin "to facilitate improved and more accessible care for all affected individuals," said Dr. Yawn, director of research at Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, Minn., and her associates.

The guideline is based on an extensive literature review of more than 13,000 abstracts and articles, which was winnowed to 1,583 original studies regarding SCD. From this, a team of health care professionals in family medicine, internal medicine, pediatric and adult hematology, psychiatry and mental health, transfusion medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, maternal/fetal medicine, and emergency department nursing compiled the guideline as well as the summary, entitled Evidence-Based Management of Sickle Cell Disease: Expert Panel Report 2014 (JAMA 2014 September 9 [doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10517]).

In addition to establishing a protocol for implementing hydroxyurea therapy, the guideline addresses changes in pneumococcal vaccination recommendations for adults and children; annual transcranial Doppler screening coupled with long-term transfusion therapy when necessary to prevent stroke in children aged 2-16 years; rapid initiation of opioids for severe pain during vasoocclusive crises; analgesics and physical therapy for avascular necrosis; ACE inhibitor treatment for adults with microalbuminuria; referral to specialists for screening and treatment of proliferative retinopathy; echocardiography to assess signs of pulmonary hypertension; and monitoring for iron overload in patients receiving transfusion therapy.

Both the summary report and the full guideline are available at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/sickle-cell-disease-guidelines/.

Today’s cosmetic patient wants to look more youthful every day without spending a lot of money, feeling any pain, or having any postprocedure downtime. With continued technological improvements, dermatologists have been able to provide our patients with the more youthful appearance they desire; however, many of these procedures still are costly, painful, and may require some downtime. New cosmeceutical therapies can be used as adjuncts to these procedures, making antiaging regimens less painful for patients and requiring less postprocedure healing time. In this article, the use of cosmeceuticals in conjunction with chemical peels, lasers, and injectables will be discussed.

Chemical Peels

Chemical peels are used to create an injury of specific skin depth with a goal of stimulating new skin growth and improving surface texture and appearance. They generally are classified as superficial, medium, or deep according to the depth of action. Currently available agents for superficial chemical peels include α-hydroxy acids (AHAs)(eg, glycolic acid [GA]) and β-hydroxy acids (BHAs)(eg, salicylic acid). β-Lipohydroxy acid (up to 10%), a derivative of salicylic acid, is widely used in Europe. Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) can be used for superficial peels (10%–20%) and for medium-depth peels (35%). Combination peels such as Monheit combination (Jessner solution plus TCA), Brody combination (solid CO₂ plus TCA), Coleman combination (GA 70% plus TCA), and Jessner solution with GA can be used as medium-depth peels. Deep peels typically are performed with phenol-based solutions, including the Baker-Gordon phenol peel and the Hetter peel (phenol or croton oil peel).

Specific agents for chemical peels should be selected based on the disorder being treated and should be administered using an appropriate peel depth determined by the histologic level or severity of skin pathology to maximize treatment success.¹ However, other considerations, such as skin characteristics, area of skin to be treated, safety concerns, healing time, and patient adherence also should be taken into account to achieve the best overall results. Although many of the deeper peels recently have been replaced by laser-based ablative treatments, superficial to medium-depth peels still are commonly used in the treatment of fine lines, uneven texture, and dyspigmentation.²

Superficial peels are reasonably safe and well tolerated, usually with only mild discomfort (eg, transient burning, irritation, erythema). Scarring, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), and infection are rare with superficial peels.¹ Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation can be exacerbated by sun exposure, making it important for patients to be educated about sun protection and closely monitored during the recovery phase. In medium and deep peels, lines of demarcation related to the administration technique can occur. Feathering the chemical peel solution at junctions with nonpeeled skin can help to avoid this effect.¹ Side effects associated with deeper chemical peels can include pigmentary changes, infections, allergic reactions, improper healing, hypersensitivity, and underlying disease exacerbation. The best way to prevent complications is to identify patients who are at risk and maintain an appropriate peel depth that balances efficacy with known adverse events.¹ 

Many adjunctive agents (eg, AHAs, BHAs, retinoids, skin-bleaching preparations) can be used to enhance chemical peels and decrease the incidence of PIH. α-Hydroxy acids and BHAs can be beneficial when applied prior to chemical peels. Moisturizers containing AHAs and BHAs can be used for 2 to 3 weeks before superficial or medium-depth chemical peels.² These agents cause thinning of the stratum corneum, thereby creating a more uniform cutaneous surface and allowing for deeper penetration of the chemical peeling agent. Retinoids also are superior prepeeling agents; however, retinoids also can increase the likelihood of irritation, which can be minimized by discontinuing retinoids for 1 week following chemical peels.² A combination of chemical peels and topical bleaching agents has been shown to be effective in treating hyperpigmentation. The chemical peel causes superficial exfoliation, which allows the lightening agent to penetrate more deeply.²

Hydroquinone (HQ) is the gold standard for improvement of existing pigmentation.³ It is one of the most effective inhibitors of melanogenesis both in vitro and in vivo and is widely used for the treatment of melanosis and other hyperpigmentary disorders. It is widely accepted that the depigmentation activity of HQ may partly be related to its ability to act as an alternate substrate of tyrosinase, thereby competing for tyrosine oxidation in active melanocytes.³ Using HQ at a 4% concentration and combining it with retinoids is quite efficacious.² Other commonly used depigmenting agents include kojic acid, ascorbic acid (vitamin C), and niacinamide, which often can be used as adjuncts with or maintenance therapy after HQ treatment.^2,3

The risk for PIH is imminent for chemical peels and cosmetic laser treatments; therefore, it is crucial to educate patients about the importance of daily and aggressive sun protection. There are several methods of reducing or eliminating postprocedure melanin formation, such as inhibiting tyrosinase synthesis, using complex copper to inhibit tyrosinase function, eliminating oxidation reactions that lead to polymer formation, slowing down the transfer of melanosomes to keratinocytes, or acting upstream on the hormone that stimulates melanogenesis.³ Most of the depigmenting agents presently on the market act by inhibiting tyrosinase via one of these mechanisms. 

Skin-lightening agents are primarily formulated as emulsions that have a higher aesthetic appeal. Many of the ingredients get better dispersions with emulsions, which is an added feature of these products. Recently, gel-based formulations also are being considered for their suitability in certain skin types. Efficacy studies for skin-lightening formulations are being carried out through clinical trials that utilize devices that measure skin color in addition to the dermatologist’s assessment.⁴ Other skin parameters (eg, moisturization, texture, barrier integrity, pH) also are being evaluated to give physicians a picture of skin health after the use of skin-lightening agents. With advances in technology and measurement techniques, it is becoming easier to identify the efficacy of these formulations in different skin types.⁴

Lasers

The ultimate goal of laser therapy often is to improve the canvas and color of the skin. Ablative laser resurfacing is reliably the most effective procedure for sun-damaged skin.² This technique causes thermally induced full-thickness epidermal and dermal denudation, which in turn facilitates cytokine-led dermal collagen formation and reepithelialization. Various nonablative modalities also are used for treating photodamaged skin. The epidermis remains unaffected by these nonablative methods, thus decreasing the need for extensive wound care and downtime that is required with ablative treatments. Combining nonablative laser treatments with topical cosmeceuticals has been proven more effective than using either method alone.² The use of topical retinoids prior to ablative laser resurfacing often results in remarkably faster postprocedure healing and reepithelialization (Figure). Retinoids are best applied nightly for at least 2 weeks and optimally for 3 months before ablative laser treatment. Application should be discontinued for 1 week immediately prior to the procedure.

Before (A) and after (B) treatment with a fractional laser in combination with a pre- and postprocedure skin care regimen consisting of retinoids and sunscreen.

Topical retinoids also are effective in reducing erythema and increasing dermal thickness after nonablative treatments. When used prior to laser treatments, retinoids have been shown to decrease the risk for postoperative milia and hyperpigmentation as well as to allow for better penetration of the laser beam secondary to a thinner stratum corneum.² Following ablative resurfacing, retinoid use should be discontinued for several weeks to allow for reepithelialization and adequate healing.

Postprocedure Wound Healing

Most of the recommended products that help decrease postprocedural inflammation are cosmeceuticals containing both antioxidants and anti-inflammatories to help decrease redness and inflammation, including various barrier repair moisturizers. Restoring barrier integrity improves the overall appearance of the skin. The ingredients normally recommended in barrier repair moisturizers are epidermal lipids such as ceramides; hyaluronic acid (HA), which is a humectant; and occlusives for patients with very dry skin. Some of the ingredients in over-the-counter cosmeceuticals that can help decrease redness and inflammation include vitamin C, vitamin E, and vitamin B or niacinamide, which will help plump the barrier and also have anti-inflammatory properties. Additionally, polyphenolic flavonoids such as soy and green tea can help decrease inflammation, along with a number of other organic ingredients, such as caffeine, feverfew, and licorice.⁵ If topical vitamin C is being considered for postprocedure use, the non–ascorbic acid variant should be administered. The magnesium ascorbyl phosphate and ascorbyl palmitate forms of vitamin C have a neutral pH and tend to be better tolerated by patients.

In addition to current prescription and over-the-counter cosmeceuticals used for postprocedure irritation and inflammation, copper peptides and other well-tolerated and effective naturally occurring compounds are being investigated and tried. Copper is a biocide that regulates keratinocyte integrins for epithelization and extracellular matrix remodeling. The extracellular matrix consists of the structural fibrillar collagens and is remodeled or degraded by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that facilitate epithelization. The predominant classes of MMPs include collagenases (ie, MMP-1) and gelatinases (ie, MMP-2, MMP-9) that degrade interstitial collagen and basement membrane proteins.⁶ The MMPs are endogenously inhibited by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). Copper is a cofactor to lysyl oxidase, which cross-links collagen and stimulates expression of MMP-2 and collagen in a complex with a matrix-derived tripeptide (glycyl-histidyl-lysine or Gly-His-Lys [GHK]) in fibroblasts.⁶ Much attention has been focused on the tripeptides, such as GHK and Gly-Gly-His, and their copper complexes, which have high activity and good skin tolerance. These complexes have been shown to play a physiological role in the process of wound healing, tissue repair, and skin inflammation. Gly-Gly-His, GHK, copper chloride, and their copper complexes decrease tumor necrosis factor α–dependent IL-6 secretion in fibroblasts.⁷ IL-6 is crucial for normal wound healing, skin inflammation, and UVB-induced erythema. Because of their anti-inflammatory properties, these copper peptides could potentially be used in place of corticosteroids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which have more side effects.

Botulinum Neurotoxin and Other Injectable Fillers

Acetyl Hexapeptide-3: A Topical Complement to Botulinum Neurotoxin

Acetyl hexapeptide-3 (Ac-Glu-Glu-Met-Gln-Arg-Arg-NH₂) was discovered when looking for a less toxic variation of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) to treat aging skin.⁸ It is patterned from the N-terminal end of the synaptosome-associated protein of molecular weight 25 kDa (SNAP-25), which is essential for docking and fusion of synaptic vesicles to the presynaptic membrane for acetylcholine release.⁹ It prevents formation and stability of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNARE) complex, inhibiting vesicle docking and calcium-dependent catecholamine exocytosis.⁸ It also has been found to substantially inhibit the repetitive muscular contraction of facial expression similar to BoNT type A but with somewhat lower efficacy. Acetyl hexapeptide-3 was shown to inhibit 30% of total catecholamine exocytosis and had a remarkable capacity to permeate the skin.¹⁰ Thus this topical form of BoNT is a useful complement to intramuscular BoNT.

Studies showing the efficacy and safety of acetyl hexapeptide-3 have demonstrated reductions in wrinkle intensity, mainly in the lateral periorbital areas. In one early study, 10 women applied an emulsion containing 10% of the hexapeptide to one lateral periorbital region and the same emulsion without the hexapeptide to the contralateral side, both twice daily for 30 days.¹⁰ A 30% decrease in the depth of skin wrinkles was seen on the hexapeptide side compared with a 10% decrease in the depth of wrinkles on the side treated without hexapeptide. No irritation or toxicity was noted.¹⁰ In another trial, 10 women applied an acetyl hexapeptide-3 cream 5% twice daily to lateral periorbital rhytides, with a 27% improvement in wrinkle depth after a 30-day treatment period.⁹ A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 60 women assessing the safety and efficacy of topical hexapeptide showed a total antiwrinkle efficacy of 48.9% on the side treated with an emulsion containing 10% of the hexapeptide compared with 0% efficacy on the placebo side.⁸ Similar to Blanes-Mira et al,¹⁰ no adverse events such as skin irritation or toxicity were seen.⁸ In all of these studies, wrinkle depth was measured by silicone replica analysis.

Topical acetyl hexapeptide-3 is effective in decreasing wrinkles, and its best use will likely be as an adjunct to intramuscular BoNT, as the intramuscular form likely has higher efficacy with the toxin injected directly into the target muscle; however, patients who want the effects of BoNT without the pain of injections may choose to use topical acetyl hexapeptide-3 alone. Patients who do use acetyl hexapeptide-3 as a complement to their intramuscular BoNT regimen may not need as many units of BoNT with each treatment or may not need certain areas injected as often, leading to fewer injections and less pain with each visit. Skin irritation was not seen as a side effect in these trials. Additionally, the topical form has insignificant acute toxicity (≥2000 mg/kg) compared to BoNT type A (20 ng/kg), and genotoxicity was not seen with testing, making it a safe complementary option to an injectable regimen.⁸

Topical Hyaluronic Acid: A Complement to Injectable Fillers

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a glycosaminoglycan found in the extracellular matrix of the skin that greatly contributes to tissue hydration. Additionally, it plays a crucial role in the synthesis of extracellular matrix molecules and epidermal cell interaction with the environment.¹¹ The water-binding capacity of HA approximates 1000 times its volume or 6 L of water per gram of HA; however, once an individual reaches adulthood, the amount of HA decreases to 5% of baseline levels, thus contributing to xerosis, loss of skin elasticity, and atrophy.^11,12 Although photoaged skin can have increased glycosaminoglycans due to an increase in chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, they are abnormally deposited on elastotic material in the superficial dermis rather than diffusely scattered, as seen in youthful skin.¹²

Many topical antiaging products contain HA, though evidence for efficacy in reducing wrinkles has been lacking, along with concerns that HA cannot penetrate the skin. This concern stems from the fact that the original molecule is 3000 nm in diameter and the intercellular space is only 15 to 50 nm. This space is only 6 to 10 nm at the hyaline membrane. Recently, scientists in Japan found a way to reduce the size of HA molecules to 5 nm (nano-HA) without changing its structure. A study of 33 women who applied the topical nano-HA twice daily for 8 weeks to one periorbital area while the contralateral side was left untreated showed improved hydration of the treated side that continued to increase when measured at 2, 4, and 8 weeks using corneometry.¹¹ Roughness decreased and elasticity increased after week 2, which were maintained throughout the study. Additionally, erythema was measured using a chroma meter, which was found to have decreased at day 57 versus day 1.¹¹ An earlier study by Pavicic et al¹² evaluated the efficacy of topical hyalu-ronan 0.1% formulations of different molecular weights—50, 130, 300, 800, or 2000 kDa—in the periocular area. A randomized group of 76 women were treated twice daily for 2 months with HA cream on one side of the periocular area and placebo cream on the other. With regard to antiwrinkle properties, only the 50- and 130-kDa HA formulations showed marked effects compared with placebo after 2 months.¹²

Topical HA would be an effective addition to an antiwrinkle regimen, especially in patients who are averse to needles or are just starting to get wrinkles and are looking for a noninvasive therapy. Additionally, it would be beneficial for patients who have an injectable filler and BoNT regimen, as these patients will be able to target wrinkles simultaneously with both topical cosmeceuticals and injectables and likely will need fewer units of BoNT and/or filler and possibly fewer injections over time, which translates to decreased pain and adverse outcomes for patients.

Conclusion

The myriad of options dermatologists have to offer patients for cosmetic enhancement provides alternatives for patients who have contraindications to certain treatments, are needle averse, or have lifestyles that do not afford them a great deal of postprocedural healing time. Being knowledgeable about these options and how to combine them for improved outcomes is essential to any cosmetic practice.

Today’s cosmetic patient wants to look more youthful every day without spending a lot of money, feeling any pain, or having any postprocedure downtime. With continued technological improvements, dermatologists have been able to provide our patients with the more youthful appearance they desire; however, many of these procedures still are costly, painful, and may require some downtime. New cosmeceutical therapies can be used as adjuncts to these procedures, making antiaging regimens less painful for patients and requiring less postprocedure healing time. In this article, the use of cosmeceuticals in conjunction with chemical peels, lasers, and injectables will be discussed.

Chemical Peels

Chemical peels are used to create an injury of specific skin depth with a goal of stimulating new skin growth and improving surface texture and appearance. They generally are classified as superficial, medium, or deep according to the depth of action. Currently available agents for superficial chemical peels include α-hydroxy acids (AHAs)(eg, glycolic acid [GA]) and β-hydroxy acids (BHAs)(eg, salicylic acid). β-Lipohydroxy acid (up to 10%), a derivative of salicylic acid, is widely used in Europe. Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) can be used for superficial peels (10%–20%) and for medium-depth peels (35%). Combination peels such as Monheit combination (Jessner solution plus TCA), Brody combination (solid CO₂ plus TCA), Coleman combination (GA 70% plus TCA), and Jessner solution with GA can be used as medium-depth peels. Deep peels typically are performed with phenol-based solutions, including the Baker-Gordon phenol peel and the Hetter peel (phenol or croton oil peel).

Specific agents for chemical peels should be selected based on the disorder being treated and should be administered using an appropriate peel depth determined by the histologic level or severity of skin pathology to maximize treatment success.¹ However, other considerations, such as skin characteristics, area of skin to be treated, safety concerns, healing time, and patient adherence also should be taken into account to achieve the best overall results. Although many of the deeper peels recently have been replaced by laser-based ablative treatments, superficial to medium-depth peels still are commonly used in the treatment of fine lines, uneven texture, and dyspigmentation.²

Superficial peels are reasonably safe and well tolerated, usually with only mild discomfort (eg, transient burning, irritation, erythema). Scarring, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), and infection are rare with superficial peels.¹ Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation can be exacerbated by sun exposure, making it important for patients to be educated about sun protection and closely monitored during the recovery phase. In medium and deep peels, lines of demarcation related to the administration technique can occur. Feathering the chemical peel solution at junctions with nonpeeled skin can help to avoid this effect.¹ Side effects associated with deeper chemical peels can include pigmentary changes, infections, allergic reactions, improper healing, hypersensitivity, and underlying disease exacerbation. The best way to prevent complications is to identify patients who are at risk and maintain an appropriate peel depth that balances efficacy with known adverse events.¹ 

Many adjunctive agents (eg, AHAs, BHAs, retinoids, skin-bleaching preparations) can be used to enhance chemical peels and decrease the incidence of PIH. α-Hydroxy acids and BHAs can be beneficial when applied prior to chemical peels. Moisturizers containing AHAs and BHAs can be used for 2 to 3 weeks before superficial or medium-depth chemical peels.² These agents cause thinning of the stratum corneum, thereby creating a more uniform cutaneous surface and allowing for deeper penetration of the chemical peeling agent. Retinoids also are superior prepeeling agents; however, retinoids also can increase the likelihood of irritation, which can be minimized by discontinuing retinoids for 1 week following chemical peels.² A combination of chemical peels and topical bleaching agents has been shown to be effective in treating hyperpigmentation. The chemical peel causes superficial exfoliation, which allows the lightening agent to penetrate more deeply.²

Hydroquinone (HQ) is the gold standard for improvement of existing pigmentation.³ It is one of the most effective inhibitors of melanogenesis both in vitro and in vivo and is widely used for the treatment of melanosis and other hyperpigmentary disorders. It is widely accepted that the depigmentation activity of HQ may partly be related to its ability to act as an alternate substrate of tyrosinase, thereby competing for tyrosine oxidation in active melanocytes.³ Using HQ at a 4% concentration and combining it with retinoids is quite efficacious.² Other commonly used depigmenting agents include kojic acid, ascorbic acid (vitamin C), and niacinamide, which often can be used as adjuncts with or maintenance therapy after HQ treatment.^2,3

The risk for PIH is imminent for chemical peels and cosmetic laser treatments; therefore, it is crucial to educate patients about the importance of daily and aggressive sun protection. There are several methods of reducing or eliminating postprocedure melanin formation, such as inhibiting tyrosinase synthesis, using complex copper to inhibit tyrosinase function, eliminating oxidation reactions that lead to polymer formation, slowing down the transfer of melanosomes to keratinocytes, or acting upstream on the hormone that stimulates melanogenesis.³ Most of the depigmenting agents presently on the market act by inhibiting tyrosinase via one of these mechanisms. 

Skin-lightening agents are primarily formulated as emulsions that have a higher aesthetic appeal. Many of the ingredients get better dispersions with emulsions, which is an added feature of these products. Recently, gel-based formulations also are being considered for their suitability in certain skin types. Efficacy studies for skin-lightening formulations are being carried out through clinical trials that utilize devices that measure skin color in addition to the dermatologist’s assessment.⁴ Other skin parameters (eg, moisturization, texture, barrier integrity, pH) also are being evaluated to give physicians a picture of skin health after the use of skin-lightening agents. With advances in technology and measurement techniques, it is becoming easier to identify the efficacy of these formulations in different skin types.⁴

Lasers

The ultimate goal of laser therapy often is to improve the canvas and color of the skin. Ablative laser resurfacing is reliably the most effective procedure for sun-damaged skin.² This technique causes thermally induced full-thickness epidermal and dermal denudation, which in turn facilitates cytokine-led dermal collagen formation and reepithelialization. Various nonablative modalities also are used for treating photodamaged skin. The epidermis remains unaffected by these nonablative methods, thus decreasing the need for extensive wound care and downtime that is required with ablative treatments. Combining nonablative laser treatments with topical cosmeceuticals has been proven more effective than using either method alone.² The use of topical retinoids prior to ablative laser resurfacing often results in remarkably faster postprocedure healing and reepithelialization (Figure). Retinoids are best applied nightly for at least 2 weeks and optimally for 3 months before ablative laser treatment. Application should be discontinued for 1 week immediately prior to the procedure.

Before (A) and after (B) treatment with a fractional laser in combination with a pre- and postprocedure skin care regimen consisting of retinoids and sunscreen.

Topical retinoids also are effective in reducing erythema and increasing dermal thickness after nonablative treatments. When used prior to laser treatments, retinoids have been shown to decrease the risk for postoperative milia and hyperpigmentation as well as to allow for better penetration of the laser beam secondary to a thinner stratum corneum.² Following ablative resurfacing, retinoid use should be discontinued for several weeks to allow for reepithelialization and adequate healing.

Postprocedure Wound Healing

Most of the recommended products that help decrease postprocedural inflammation are cosmeceuticals containing both antioxidants and anti-inflammatories to help decrease redness and inflammation, including various barrier repair moisturizers. Restoring barrier integrity improves the overall appearance of the skin. The ingredients normally recommended in barrier repair moisturizers are epidermal lipids such as ceramides; hyaluronic acid (HA), which is a humectant; and occlusives for patients with very dry skin. Some of the ingredients in over-the-counter cosmeceuticals that can help decrease redness and inflammation include vitamin C, vitamin E, and vitamin B or niacinamide, which will help plump the barrier and also have anti-inflammatory properties. Additionally, polyphenolic flavonoids such as soy and green tea can help decrease inflammation, along with a number of other organic ingredients, such as caffeine, feverfew, and licorice.⁵ If topical vitamin C is being considered for postprocedure use, the non–ascorbic acid variant should be administered. The magnesium ascorbyl phosphate and ascorbyl palmitate forms of vitamin C have a neutral pH and tend to be better tolerated by patients.

In addition to current prescription and over-the-counter cosmeceuticals used for postprocedure irritation and inflammation, copper peptides and other well-tolerated and effective naturally occurring compounds are being investigated and tried. Copper is a biocide that regulates keratinocyte integrins for epithelization and extracellular matrix remodeling. The extracellular matrix consists of the structural fibrillar collagens and is remodeled or degraded by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that facilitate epithelization. The predominant classes of MMPs include collagenases (ie, MMP-1) and gelatinases (ie, MMP-2, MMP-9) that degrade interstitial collagen and basement membrane proteins.⁶ The MMPs are endogenously inhibited by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). Copper is a cofactor to lysyl oxidase, which cross-links collagen and stimulates expression of MMP-2 and collagen in a complex with a matrix-derived tripeptide (glycyl-histidyl-lysine or Gly-His-Lys [GHK]) in fibroblasts.⁶ Much attention has been focused on the tripeptides, such as GHK and Gly-Gly-His, and their copper complexes, which have high activity and good skin tolerance. These complexes have been shown to play a physiological role in the process of wound healing, tissue repair, and skin inflammation. Gly-Gly-His, GHK, copper chloride, and their copper complexes decrease tumor necrosis factor α–dependent IL-6 secretion in fibroblasts.⁷ IL-6 is crucial for normal wound healing, skin inflammation, and UVB-induced erythema. Because of their anti-inflammatory properties, these copper peptides could potentially be used in place of corticosteroids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which have more side effects.

Botulinum Neurotoxin and Other Injectable Fillers

Acetyl Hexapeptide-3: A Topical Complement to Botulinum Neurotoxin

Acetyl hexapeptide-3 (Ac-Glu-Glu-Met-Gln-Arg-Arg-NH₂) was discovered when looking for a less toxic variation of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) to treat aging skin.⁸ It is patterned from the N-terminal end of the synaptosome-associated protein of molecular weight 25 kDa (SNAP-25), which is essential for docking and fusion of synaptic vesicles to the presynaptic membrane for acetylcholine release.⁹ It prevents formation and stability of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNARE) complex, inhibiting vesicle docking and calcium-dependent catecholamine exocytosis.⁸ It also has been found to substantially inhibit the repetitive muscular contraction of facial expression similar to BoNT type A but with somewhat lower efficacy. Acetyl hexapeptide-3 was shown to inhibit 30% of total catecholamine exocytosis and had a remarkable capacity to permeate the skin.¹⁰ Thus this topical form of BoNT is a useful complement to intramuscular BoNT.

Studies showing the efficacy and safety of acetyl hexapeptide-3 have demonstrated reductions in wrinkle intensity, mainly in the lateral periorbital areas. In one early study, 10 women applied an emulsion containing 10% of the hexapeptide to one lateral periorbital region and the same emulsion without the hexapeptide to the contralateral side, both twice daily for 30 days.¹⁰ A 30% decrease in the depth of skin wrinkles was seen on the hexapeptide side compared with a 10% decrease in the depth of wrinkles on the side treated without hexapeptide. No irritation or toxicity was noted.¹⁰ In another trial, 10 women applied an acetyl hexapeptide-3 cream 5% twice daily to lateral periorbital rhytides, with a 27% improvement in wrinkle depth after a 30-day treatment period.⁹ A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 60 women assessing the safety and efficacy of topical hexapeptide showed a total antiwrinkle efficacy of 48.9% on the side treated with an emulsion containing 10% of the hexapeptide compared with 0% efficacy on the placebo side.⁸ Similar to Blanes-Mira et al,¹⁰ no adverse events such as skin irritation or toxicity were seen.⁸ In all of these studies, wrinkle depth was measured by silicone replica analysis.

Topical acetyl hexapeptide-3 is effective in decreasing wrinkles, and its best use will likely be as an adjunct to intramuscular BoNT, as the intramuscular form likely has higher efficacy with the toxin injected directly into the target muscle; however, patients who want the effects of BoNT without the pain of injections may choose to use topical acetyl hexapeptide-3 alone. Patients who do use acetyl hexapeptide-3 as a complement to their intramuscular BoNT regimen may not need as many units of BoNT with each treatment or may not need certain areas injected as often, leading to fewer injections and less pain with each visit. Skin irritation was not seen as a side effect in these trials. Additionally, the topical form has insignificant acute toxicity (≥2000 mg/kg) compared to BoNT type A (20 ng/kg), and genotoxicity was not seen with testing, making it a safe complementary option to an injectable regimen.⁸

Topical Hyaluronic Acid: A Complement to Injectable Fillers

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a glycosaminoglycan found in the extracellular matrix of the skin that greatly contributes to tissue hydration. Additionally, it plays a crucial role in the synthesis of extracellular matrix molecules and epidermal cell interaction with the environment.¹¹ The water-binding capacity of HA approximates 1000 times its volume or 6 L of water per gram of HA; however, once an individual reaches adulthood, the amount of HA decreases to 5% of baseline levels, thus contributing to xerosis, loss of skin elasticity, and atrophy.^11,12 Although photoaged skin can have increased glycosaminoglycans due to an increase in chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, they are abnormally deposited on elastotic material in the superficial dermis rather than diffusely scattered, as seen in youthful skin.¹²

Many topical antiaging products contain HA, though evidence for efficacy in reducing wrinkles has been lacking, along with concerns that HA cannot penetrate the skin. This concern stems from the fact that the original molecule is 3000 nm in diameter and the intercellular space is only 15 to 50 nm. This space is only 6 to 10 nm at the hyaline membrane. Recently, scientists in Japan found a way to reduce the size of HA molecules to 5 nm (nano-HA) without changing its structure. A study of 33 women who applied the topical nano-HA twice daily for 8 weeks to one periorbital area while the contralateral side was left untreated showed improved hydration of the treated side that continued to increase when measured at 2, 4, and 8 weeks using corneometry.¹¹ Roughness decreased and elasticity increased after week 2, which were maintained throughout the study. Additionally, erythema was measured using a chroma meter, which was found to have decreased at day 57 versus day 1.¹¹ An earlier study by Pavicic et al¹² evaluated the efficacy of topical hyalu-ronan 0.1% formulations of different molecular weights—50, 130, 300, 800, or 2000 kDa—in the periocular area. A randomized group of 76 women were treated twice daily for 2 months with HA cream on one side of the periocular area and placebo cream on the other. With regard to antiwrinkle properties, only the 50- and 130-kDa HA formulations showed marked effects compared with placebo after 2 months.¹²

Topical HA would be an effective addition to an antiwrinkle regimen, especially in patients who are averse to needles or are just starting to get wrinkles and are looking for a noninvasive therapy. Additionally, it would be beneficial for patients who have an injectable filler and BoNT regimen, as these patients will be able to target wrinkles simultaneously with both topical cosmeceuticals and injectables and likely will need fewer units of BoNT and/or filler and possibly fewer injections over time, which translates to decreased pain and adverse outcomes for patients.

Conclusion

The myriad of options dermatologists have to offer patients for cosmetic enhancement provides alternatives for patients who have contraindications to certain treatments, are needle averse, or have lifestyles that do not afford them a great deal of postprocedural healing time. Being knowledgeable about these options and how to combine them for improved outcomes is essential to any cosmetic practice.

Today’s cosmetic patient wants to look more youthful every day without spending a lot of money, feeling any pain, or having any postprocedure downtime. With continued technological improvements, dermatologists have been able to provide our patients with the more youthful appearance they desire; however, many of these procedures still are costly, painful, and may require some downtime. New cosmeceutical therapies can be used as adjuncts to these procedures, making antiaging regimens less painful for patients and requiring less postprocedure healing time. In this article, the use of cosmeceuticals in conjunction with chemical peels, lasers, and injectables will be discussed.

Chemical Peels

Chemical peels are used to create an injury of specific skin depth with a goal of stimulating new skin growth and improving surface texture and appearance. They generally are classified as superficial, medium, or deep according to the depth of action. Currently available agents for superficial chemical peels include α-hydroxy acids (AHAs)(eg, glycolic acid [GA]) and β-hydroxy acids (BHAs)(eg, salicylic acid). β-Lipohydroxy acid (up to 10%), a derivative of salicylic acid, is widely used in Europe. Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) can be used for superficial peels (10%–20%) and for medium-depth peels (35%). Combination peels such as Monheit combination (Jessner solution plus TCA), Brody combination (solid CO₂ plus TCA), Coleman combination (GA 70% plus TCA), and Jessner solution with GA can be used as medium-depth peels. Deep peels typically are performed with phenol-based solutions, including the Baker-Gordon phenol peel and the Hetter peel (phenol or croton oil peel).

Specific agents for chemical peels should be selected based on the disorder being treated and should be administered using an appropriate peel depth determined by the histologic level or severity of skin pathology to maximize treatment success.¹ However, other considerations, such as skin characteristics, area of skin to be treated, safety concerns, healing time, and patient adherence also should be taken into account to achieve the best overall results. Although many of the deeper peels recently have been replaced by laser-based ablative treatments, superficial to medium-depth peels still are commonly used in the treatment of fine lines, uneven texture, and dyspigmentation.²

Superficial peels are reasonably safe and well tolerated, usually with only mild discomfort (eg, transient burning, irritation, erythema). Scarring, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), and infection are rare with superficial peels.¹ Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation can be exacerbated by sun exposure, making it important for patients to be educated about sun protection and closely monitored during the recovery phase. In medium and deep peels, lines of demarcation related to the administration technique can occur. Feathering the chemical peel solution at junctions with nonpeeled skin can help to avoid this effect.¹ Side effects associated with deeper chemical peels can include pigmentary changes, infections, allergic reactions, improper healing, hypersensitivity, and underlying disease exacerbation. The best way to prevent complications is to identify patients who are at risk and maintain an appropriate peel depth that balances efficacy with known adverse events.¹ 

Many adjunctive agents (eg, AHAs, BHAs, retinoids, skin-bleaching preparations) can be used to enhance chemical peels and decrease the incidence of PIH. α-Hydroxy acids and BHAs can be beneficial when applied prior to chemical peels. Moisturizers containing AHAs and BHAs can be used for 2 to 3 weeks before superficial or medium-depth chemical peels.² These agents cause thinning of the stratum corneum, thereby creating a more uniform cutaneous surface and allowing for deeper penetration of the chemical peeling agent. Retinoids also are superior prepeeling agents; however, retinoids also can increase the likelihood of irritation, which can be minimized by discontinuing retinoids for 1 week following chemical peels.² A combination of chemical peels and topical bleaching agents has been shown to be effective in treating hyperpigmentation. The chemical peel causes superficial exfoliation, which allows the lightening agent to penetrate more deeply.²

Hydroquinone (HQ) is the gold standard for improvement of existing pigmentation.³ It is one of the most effective inhibitors of melanogenesis both in vitro and in vivo and is widely used for the treatment of melanosis and other hyperpigmentary disorders. It is widely accepted that the depigmentation activity of HQ may partly be related to its ability to act as an alternate substrate of tyrosinase, thereby competing for tyrosine oxidation in active melanocytes.³ Using HQ at a 4% concentration and combining it with retinoids is quite efficacious.² Other commonly used depigmenting agents include kojic acid, ascorbic acid (vitamin C), and niacinamide, which often can be used as adjuncts with or maintenance therapy after HQ treatment.^2,3

The risk for PIH is imminent for chemical peels and cosmetic laser treatments; therefore, it is crucial to educate patients about the importance of daily and aggressive sun protection. There are several methods of reducing or eliminating postprocedure melanin formation, such as inhibiting tyrosinase synthesis, using complex copper to inhibit tyrosinase function, eliminating oxidation reactions that lead to polymer formation, slowing down the transfer of melanosomes to keratinocytes, or acting upstream on the hormone that stimulates melanogenesis.³ Most of the depigmenting agents presently on the market act by inhibiting tyrosinase via one of these mechanisms. 

Skin-lightening agents are primarily formulated as emulsions that have a higher aesthetic appeal. Many of the ingredients get better dispersions with emulsions, which is an added feature of these products. Recently, gel-based formulations also are being considered for their suitability in certain skin types. Efficacy studies for skin-lightening formulations are being carried out through clinical trials that utilize devices that measure skin color in addition to the dermatologist’s assessment.⁴ Other skin parameters (eg, moisturization, texture, barrier integrity, pH) also are being evaluated to give physicians a picture of skin health after the use of skin-lightening agents. With advances in technology and measurement techniques, it is becoming easier to identify the efficacy of these formulations in different skin types.⁴

Lasers

The ultimate goal of laser therapy often is to improve the canvas and color of the skin. Ablative laser resurfacing is reliably the most effective procedure for sun-damaged skin.² This technique causes thermally induced full-thickness epidermal and dermal denudation, which in turn facilitates cytokine-led dermal collagen formation and reepithelialization. Various nonablative modalities also are used for treating photodamaged skin. The epidermis remains unaffected by these nonablative methods, thus decreasing the need for extensive wound care and downtime that is required with ablative treatments. Combining nonablative laser treatments with topical cosmeceuticals has been proven more effective than using either method alone.² The use of topical retinoids prior to ablative laser resurfacing often results in remarkably faster postprocedure healing and reepithelialization (Figure). Retinoids are best applied nightly for at least 2 weeks and optimally for 3 months before ablative laser treatment. Application should be discontinued for 1 week immediately prior to the procedure.

Before (A) and after (B) treatment with a fractional laser in combination with a pre- and postprocedure skin care regimen consisting of retinoids and sunscreen.

Topical retinoids also are effective in reducing erythema and increasing dermal thickness after nonablative treatments. When used prior to laser treatments, retinoids have been shown to decrease the risk for postoperative milia and hyperpigmentation as well as to allow for better penetration of the laser beam secondary to a thinner stratum corneum.² Following ablative resurfacing, retinoid use should be discontinued for several weeks to allow for reepithelialization and adequate healing.

Postprocedure Wound Healing

Most of the recommended products that help decrease postprocedural inflammation are cosmeceuticals containing both antioxidants and anti-inflammatories to help decrease redness and inflammation, including various barrier repair moisturizers. Restoring barrier integrity improves the overall appearance of the skin. The ingredients normally recommended in barrier repair moisturizers are epidermal lipids such as ceramides; hyaluronic acid (HA), which is a humectant; and occlusives for patients with very dry skin. Some of the ingredients in over-the-counter cosmeceuticals that can help decrease redness and inflammation include vitamin C, vitamin E, and vitamin B or niacinamide, which will help plump the barrier and also have anti-inflammatory properties. Additionally, polyphenolic flavonoids such as soy and green tea can help decrease inflammation, along with a number of other organic ingredients, such as caffeine, feverfew, and licorice.⁵ If topical vitamin C is being considered for postprocedure use, the non–ascorbic acid variant should be administered. The magnesium ascorbyl phosphate and ascorbyl palmitate forms of vitamin C have a neutral pH and tend to be better tolerated by patients.

In addition to current prescription and over-the-counter cosmeceuticals used for postprocedure irritation and inflammation, copper peptides and other well-tolerated and effective naturally occurring compounds are being investigated and tried. Copper is a biocide that regulates keratinocyte integrins for epithelization and extracellular matrix remodeling. The extracellular matrix consists of the structural fibrillar collagens and is remodeled or degraded by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that facilitate epithelization. The predominant classes of MMPs include collagenases (ie, MMP-1) and gelatinases (ie, MMP-2, MMP-9) that degrade interstitial collagen and basement membrane proteins.⁶ The MMPs are endogenously inhibited by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). Copper is a cofactor to lysyl oxidase, which cross-links collagen and stimulates expression of MMP-2 and collagen in a complex with a matrix-derived tripeptide (glycyl-histidyl-lysine or Gly-His-Lys [GHK]) in fibroblasts.⁶ Much attention has been focused on the tripeptides, such as GHK and Gly-Gly-His, and their copper complexes, which have high activity and good skin tolerance. These complexes have been shown to play a physiological role in the process of wound healing, tissue repair, and skin inflammation. Gly-Gly-His, GHK, copper chloride, and their copper complexes decrease tumor necrosis factor α–dependent IL-6 secretion in fibroblasts.⁷ IL-6 is crucial for normal wound healing, skin inflammation, and UVB-induced erythema. Because of their anti-inflammatory properties, these copper peptides could potentially be used in place of corticosteroids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which have more side effects.

Botulinum Neurotoxin and Other Injectable Fillers

Acetyl Hexapeptide-3: A Topical Complement to Botulinum Neurotoxin

Acetyl hexapeptide-3 (Ac-Glu-Glu-Met-Gln-Arg-Arg-NH₂) was discovered when looking for a less toxic variation of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) to treat aging skin.⁸ It is patterned from the N-terminal end of the synaptosome-associated protein of molecular weight 25 kDa (SNAP-25), which is essential for docking and fusion of synaptic vesicles to the presynaptic membrane for acetylcholine release.⁹ It prevents formation and stability of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNARE) complex, inhibiting vesicle docking and calcium-dependent catecholamine exocytosis.⁸ It also has been found to substantially inhibit the repetitive muscular contraction of facial expression similar to BoNT type A but with somewhat lower efficacy. Acetyl hexapeptide-3 was shown to inhibit 30% of total catecholamine exocytosis and had a remarkable capacity to permeate the skin.¹⁰ Thus this topical form of BoNT is a useful complement to intramuscular BoNT.

Studies showing the efficacy and safety of acetyl hexapeptide-3 have demonstrated reductions in wrinkle intensity, mainly in the lateral periorbital areas. In one early study, 10 women applied an emulsion containing 10% of the hexapeptide to one lateral periorbital region and the same emulsion without the hexapeptide to the contralateral side, both twice daily for 30 days.¹⁰ A 30% decrease in the depth of skin wrinkles was seen on the hexapeptide side compared with a 10% decrease in the depth of wrinkles on the side treated without hexapeptide. No irritation or toxicity was noted.¹⁰ In another trial, 10 women applied an acetyl hexapeptide-3 cream 5% twice daily to lateral periorbital rhytides, with a 27% improvement in wrinkle depth after a 30-day treatment period.⁹ A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 60 women assessing the safety and efficacy of topical hexapeptide showed a total antiwrinkle efficacy of 48.9% on the side treated with an emulsion containing 10% of the hexapeptide compared with 0% efficacy on the placebo side.⁸ Similar to Blanes-Mira et al,¹⁰ no adverse events such as skin irritation or toxicity were seen.⁸ In all of these studies, wrinkle depth was measured by silicone replica analysis.

Topical acetyl hexapeptide-3 is effective in decreasing wrinkles, and its best use will likely be as an adjunct to intramuscular BoNT, as the intramuscular form likely has higher efficacy with the toxin injected directly into the target muscle; however, patients who want the effects of BoNT without the pain of injections may choose to use topical acetyl hexapeptide-3 alone. Patients who do use acetyl hexapeptide-3 as a complement to their intramuscular BoNT regimen may not need as many units of BoNT with each treatment or may not need certain areas injected as often, leading to fewer injections and less pain with each visit. Skin irritation was not seen as a side effect in these trials. Additionally, the topical form has insignificant acute toxicity (≥2000 mg/kg) compared to BoNT type A (20 ng/kg), and genotoxicity was not seen with testing, making it a safe complementary option to an injectable regimen.⁸

Topical Hyaluronic Acid: A Complement to Injectable Fillers

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a glycosaminoglycan found in the extracellular matrix of the skin that greatly contributes to tissue hydration. Additionally, it plays a crucial role in the synthesis of extracellular matrix molecules and epidermal cell interaction with the environment.¹¹ The water-binding capacity of HA approximates 1000 times its volume or 6 L of water per gram of HA; however, once an individual reaches adulthood, the amount of HA decreases to 5% of baseline levels, thus contributing to xerosis, loss of skin elasticity, and atrophy.^11,12 Although photoaged skin can have increased glycosaminoglycans due to an increase in chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, they are abnormally deposited on elastotic material in the superficial dermis rather than diffusely scattered, as seen in youthful skin.¹²

Many topical antiaging products contain HA, though evidence for efficacy in reducing wrinkles has been lacking, along with concerns that HA cannot penetrate the skin. This concern stems from the fact that the original molecule is 3000 nm in diameter and the intercellular space is only 15 to 50 nm. This space is only 6 to 10 nm at the hyaline membrane. Recently, scientists in Japan found a way to reduce the size of HA molecules to 5 nm (nano-HA) without changing its structure. A study of 33 women who applied the topical nano-HA twice daily for 8 weeks to one periorbital area while the contralateral side was left untreated showed improved hydration of the treated side that continued to increase when measured at 2, 4, and 8 weeks using corneometry.¹¹ Roughness decreased and elasticity increased after week 2, which were maintained throughout the study. Additionally, erythema was measured using a chroma meter, which was found to have decreased at day 57 versus day 1.¹¹ An earlier study by Pavicic et al¹² evaluated the efficacy of topical hyalu-ronan 0.1% formulations of different molecular weights—50, 130, 300, 800, or 2000 kDa—in the periocular area. A randomized group of 76 women were treated twice daily for 2 months with HA cream on one side of the periocular area and placebo cream on the other. With regard to antiwrinkle properties, only the 50- and 130-kDa HA formulations showed marked effects compared with placebo after 2 months.¹²

Topical HA would be an effective addition to an antiwrinkle regimen, especially in patients who are averse to needles or are just starting to get wrinkles and are looking for a noninvasive therapy. Additionally, it would be beneficial for patients who have an injectable filler and BoNT regimen, as these patients will be able to target wrinkles simultaneously with both topical cosmeceuticals and injectables and likely will need fewer units of BoNT and/or filler and possibly fewer injections over time, which translates to decreased pain and adverse outcomes for patients.

Conclusion

The myriad of options dermatologists have to offer patients for cosmetic enhancement provides alternatives for patients who have contraindications to certain treatments, are needle averse, or have lifestyles that do not afford them a great deal of postprocedural healing time. Being knowledgeable about these options and how to combine them for improved outcomes is essential to any cosmetic practice.

BARCELONA – More extensive catheter ablation procedures offered no benefit over pulmonary vein isolation alone for persistent atrial fibrillation in the largest-ever randomized trial examining outcomes of the three most popular ablation strategies.

"This study, the STAR AF 2 trial, will force a change in thinking both in the guidelines as well as in clinical practice," Dr. Atul Verma predicted, in presenting the study findings at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.

Because of a widespread belief that catheter ablation success rates are probably lower in persistent AF than in paroxysmal AF, guidelines suggest "operators should consider more ablation based on linear lesions or complex fractionated electrograms," in addition to pulmonary vein isolation, in treating patients with persistent AF (Heart Rhythm 2012;9:632-96). The guidelines noted, however, that there is little evidence to support this recommendation.

The STAR AF 2 trial was conducted to learn if more complex ablation procedures really do provide greater efficacy than pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone. The study included 589 patients at 48 centers in 12 countries. All patients had persistent AF refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic drug and were about to undergo their first-ever catheter ablation.

Participants were randomized 1:4:4 to PVI alone with the procedural endpoint of entrance and exit block by circular mapping catheter, or PVI plus mapping and ablation of complex fractionated electrograms during AF identified using a validated 3-D mapping system, or PVI plus a left atrial roof line and another line along the mitral valve isthmus with the endpoint of bidirectional block confirmed by prespecified pacing maneuvers.

Patients remained blinded as to which of the three treatments they received. They were prospectively followed with 24-hour Holter monitoring at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months along with weekly transtelephonic monitoring transmissions or at any time they felt symptoms.

Successful PVI was achieved in 97% of patients, complex fractionated electrograms were eliminated in 80% of patients assigned to that strategy, and both target lines were blocked in 74% of patients who underwent linear ablation.

The primary outcome was freedom from a documented episode of AF lasting more than 30 seconds after one procedure with or without antiarrhythmic medication through 18 months. The rates were 59% with PVI only, 48% with PVI plus complex fractionated electrograms, and 44% with PVI and linear ablation. These rates weren’t significantly different.

There were downsides to the two more elaborate ablation strategies. Procedural times were roughly 1 hour longer. Moreover, mean fluoroscopy time was 29 minutes in the PVI-only group, compared with 41 and 42 minutes with the more complex procedures. That translates to 44% more radiation exposure for both operators and patients, with absolutely no resultant added benefit over PVI alone, noted Dr. Verma, an electrophysiologist at Southlake Regional Health Center in Newmarket, Ont.

Complication rates across the board in STAR AF 2 were among the lowest ever reported in a multicenter clinical trial of catheter ablation. Of note, however, the sole fatal complication was the result of an atrial esophageal fistula in a patient assigned to PVI plus electrogram ablation.

Discussant Dr. Jagmeet P. Singh, director of the cardiac resynchronization therapy program at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, called STAR AF 2 "a fantastic trial."

"This study surely advocates that less ablation is more – and less works quite well," he said, noting that the roughly 50% success rate at 18 months with PVI alone is comparable to prior published success rates in paroxysmal AF.

Discussant Dr. Paulus Kirchhof said his own recent informal survey of high-volume catheter ablation centers in the United States and Europe indicated roughly one-third do PVI alone for patients with persistent AF, one-third do PVI plus ablation of complex fractionated electrograms, and one-third do PVI plus linear ablation.

"So I would say this was a question at equipoise," added Dr. Kirchhof, professor of cardiovascular sciences at the University of Birmingham (England).

Zeroing in on the added fluoroscopy time associated with the more complex ablation procedures, he noted that observational data suggest lengthier fluoroscopy may be associated with silent, subclinical brain lesions. Based upon the STAR 2 AF results, therefore, a reasonable strategy now for persistent AF is to do PVI alone, then wait and see what happens before considering additional ablation procedures later, he said.

"More importantly, I think this study shows we have to go back to the drawing board. The time pattern of AF – its duration, whether it’s paroxysmal or persistent, the left atrial size – all these things we believe identify patients who need more therapy, they may not actually help us. We just have to accept that not all patients with AF are the same, and that the pattern of AF does not discriminate so well. I think what we can really learn from this trial moving forward is that we need a clinical classification of AF patients. We have to define the patient who would benefit before we continue to develop ever-more intensive interventional strategies," he commented.

Factors worthy of further study as potential tools for separating AF patients into subgroups for treatment purposes include markers of atrial fibrosis, whether by imaging, blood, or ECG patterns; markers of parasympathetic/sympathetic imbalance; clinical markers of abnormal calcium metabolism; or blood markers, Dr. Kirchhof added.

The STAR AF 2 trial was funded by St. Jude Medical. Dr. Verma, Dr. Singh, and Dr. Kirchhof reported receiving grant support from St. Jude Medical as well as other pharmaceutical and medical device companies. In addition, Dr. Verma and Dr. Singh have served on advisory boards for St. Jude.

[email protected]

BARCELONA – More extensive catheter ablation procedures offered no benefit over pulmonary vein isolation alone for persistent atrial fibrillation in the largest-ever randomized trial examining outcomes of the three most popular ablation strategies.

"This study, the STAR AF 2 trial, will force a change in thinking both in the guidelines as well as in clinical practice," Dr. Atul Verma predicted, in presenting the study findings at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.

Because of a widespread belief that catheter ablation success rates are probably lower in persistent AF than in paroxysmal AF, guidelines suggest "operators should consider more ablation based on linear lesions or complex fractionated electrograms," in addition to pulmonary vein isolation, in treating patients with persistent AF (Heart Rhythm 2012;9:632-96). The guidelines noted, however, that there is little evidence to support this recommendation.

The STAR AF 2 trial was conducted to learn if more complex ablation procedures really do provide greater efficacy than pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone. The study included 589 patients at 48 centers in 12 countries. All patients had persistent AF refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic drug and were about to undergo their first-ever catheter ablation.

Participants were randomized 1:4:4 to PVI alone with the procedural endpoint of entrance and exit block by circular mapping catheter, or PVI plus mapping and ablation of complex fractionated electrograms during AF identified using a validated 3-D mapping system, or PVI plus a left atrial roof line and another line along the mitral valve isthmus with the endpoint of bidirectional block confirmed by prespecified pacing maneuvers.

Patients remained blinded as to which of the three treatments they received. They were prospectively followed with 24-hour Holter monitoring at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months along with weekly transtelephonic monitoring transmissions or at any time they felt symptoms.

Successful PVI was achieved in 97% of patients, complex fractionated electrograms were eliminated in 80% of patients assigned to that strategy, and both target lines were blocked in 74% of patients who underwent linear ablation.

The primary outcome was freedom from a documented episode of AF lasting more than 30 seconds after one procedure with or without antiarrhythmic medication through 18 months. The rates were 59% with PVI only, 48% with PVI plus complex fractionated electrograms, and 44% with PVI and linear ablation. These rates weren’t significantly different.

There were downsides to the two more elaborate ablation strategies. Procedural times were roughly 1 hour longer. Moreover, mean fluoroscopy time was 29 minutes in the PVI-only group, compared with 41 and 42 minutes with the more complex procedures. That translates to 44% more radiation exposure for both operators and patients, with absolutely no resultant added benefit over PVI alone, noted Dr. Verma, an electrophysiologist at Southlake Regional Health Center in Newmarket, Ont.

Complication rates across the board in STAR AF 2 were among the lowest ever reported in a multicenter clinical trial of catheter ablation. Of note, however, the sole fatal complication was the result of an atrial esophageal fistula in a patient assigned to PVI plus electrogram ablation.

Discussant Dr. Jagmeet P. Singh, director of the cardiac resynchronization therapy program at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, called STAR AF 2 "a fantastic trial."

"This study surely advocates that less ablation is more – and less works quite well," he said, noting that the roughly 50% success rate at 18 months with PVI alone is comparable to prior published success rates in paroxysmal AF.

Discussant Dr. Paulus Kirchhof said his own recent informal survey of high-volume catheter ablation centers in the United States and Europe indicated roughly one-third do PVI alone for patients with persistent AF, one-third do PVI plus ablation of complex fractionated electrograms, and one-third do PVI plus linear ablation.

"So I would say this was a question at equipoise," added Dr. Kirchhof, professor of cardiovascular sciences at the University of Birmingham (England).

Zeroing in on the added fluoroscopy time associated with the more complex ablation procedures, he noted that observational data suggest lengthier fluoroscopy may be associated with silent, subclinical brain lesions. Based upon the STAR 2 AF results, therefore, a reasonable strategy now for persistent AF is to do PVI alone, then wait and see what happens before considering additional ablation procedures later, he said.

"More importantly, I think this study shows we have to go back to the drawing board. The time pattern of AF – its duration, whether it’s paroxysmal or persistent, the left atrial size – all these things we believe identify patients who need more therapy, they may not actually help us. We just have to accept that not all patients with AF are the same, and that the pattern of AF does not discriminate so well. I think what we can really learn from this trial moving forward is that we need a clinical classification of AF patients. We have to define the patient who would benefit before we continue to develop ever-more intensive interventional strategies," he commented.

Factors worthy of further study as potential tools for separating AF patients into subgroups for treatment purposes include markers of atrial fibrosis, whether by imaging, blood, or ECG patterns; markers of parasympathetic/sympathetic imbalance; clinical markers of abnormal calcium metabolism; or blood markers, Dr. Kirchhof added.

The STAR AF 2 trial was funded by St. Jude Medical. Dr. Verma, Dr. Singh, and Dr. Kirchhof reported receiving grant support from St. Jude Medical as well as other pharmaceutical and medical device companies. In addition, Dr. Verma and Dr. Singh have served on advisory boards for St. Jude.

[email protected]

BARCELONA – More extensive catheter ablation procedures offered no benefit over pulmonary vein isolation alone for persistent atrial fibrillation in the largest-ever randomized trial examining outcomes of the three most popular ablation strategies.

"This study, the STAR AF 2 trial, will force a change in thinking both in the guidelines as well as in clinical practice," Dr. Atul Verma predicted, in presenting the study findings at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.

Because of a widespread belief that catheter ablation success rates are probably lower in persistent AF than in paroxysmal AF, guidelines suggest "operators should consider more ablation based on linear lesions or complex fractionated electrograms," in addition to pulmonary vein isolation, in treating patients with persistent AF (Heart Rhythm 2012;9:632-96). The guidelines noted, however, that there is little evidence to support this recommendation.

The STAR AF 2 trial was conducted to learn if more complex ablation procedures really do provide greater efficacy than pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone. The study included 589 patients at 48 centers in 12 countries. All patients had persistent AF refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic drug and were about to undergo their first-ever catheter ablation.

Participants were randomized 1:4:4 to PVI alone with the procedural endpoint of entrance and exit block by circular mapping catheter, or PVI plus mapping and ablation of complex fractionated electrograms during AF identified using a validated 3-D mapping system, or PVI plus a left atrial roof line and another line along the mitral valve isthmus with the endpoint of bidirectional block confirmed by prespecified pacing maneuvers.

Patients remained blinded as to which of the three treatments they received. They were prospectively followed with 24-hour Holter monitoring at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months along with weekly transtelephonic monitoring transmissions or at any time they felt symptoms.

Successful PVI was achieved in 97% of patients, complex fractionated electrograms were eliminated in 80% of patients assigned to that strategy, and both target lines were blocked in 74% of patients who underwent linear ablation.

The primary outcome was freedom from a documented episode of AF lasting more than 30 seconds after one procedure with or without antiarrhythmic medication through 18 months. The rates were 59% with PVI only, 48% with PVI plus complex fractionated electrograms, and 44% with PVI and linear ablation. These rates weren’t significantly different.

There were downsides to the two more elaborate ablation strategies. Procedural times were roughly 1 hour longer. Moreover, mean fluoroscopy time was 29 minutes in the PVI-only group, compared with 41 and 42 minutes with the more complex procedures. That translates to 44% more radiation exposure for both operators and patients, with absolutely no resultant added benefit over PVI alone, noted Dr. Verma, an electrophysiologist at Southlake Regional Health Center in Newmarket, Ont.

Complication rates across the board in STAR AF 2 were among the lowest ever reported in a multicenter clinical trial of catheter ablation. Of note, however, the sole fatal complication was the result of an atrial esophageal fistula in a patient assigned to PVI plus electrogram ablation.

Discussant Dr. Jagmeet P. Singh, director of the cardiac resynchronization therapy program at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, called STAR AF 2 "a fantastic trial."

"This study surely advocates that less ablation is more – and less works quite well," he said, noting that the roughly 50% success rate at 18 months with PVI alone is comparable to prior published success rates in paroxysmal AF.

Discussant Dr. Paulus Kirchhof said his own recent informal survey of high-volume catheter ablation centers in the United States and Europe indicated roughly one-third do PVI alone for patients with persistent AF, one-third do PVI plus ablation of complex fractionated electrograms, and one-third do PVI plus linear ablation.

"So I would say this was a question at equipoise," added Dr. Kirchhof, professor of cardiovascular sciences at the University of Birmingham (England).

Zeroing in on the added fluoroscopy time associated with the more complex ablation procedures, he noted that observational data suggest lengthier fluoroscopy may be associated with silent, subclinical brain lesions. Based upon the STAR 2 AF results, therefore, a reasonable strategy now for persistent AF is to do PVI alone, then wait and see what happens before considering additional ablation procedures later, he said.

"More importantly, I think this study shows we have to go back to the drawing board. The time pattern of AF – its duration, whether it’s paroxysmal or persistent, the left atrial size – all these things we believe identify patients who need more therapy, they may not actually help us. We just have to accept that not all patients with AF are the same, and that the pattern of AF does not discriminate so well. I think what we can really learn from this trial moving forward is that we need a clinical classification of AF patients. We have to define the patient who would benefit before we continue to develop ever-more intensive interventional strategies," he commented.

Factors worthy of further study as potential tools for separating AF patients into subgroups for treatment purposes include markers of atrial fibrosis, whether by imaging, blood, or ECG patterns; markers of parasympathetic/sympathetic imbalance; clinical markers of abnormal calcium metabolism; or blood markers, Dr. Kirchhof added.

The STAR AF 2 trial was funded by St. Jude Medical. Dr. Verma, Dr. Singh, and Dr. Kirchhof reported receiving grant support from St. Jude Medical as well as other pharmaceutical and medical device companies. In addition, Dr. Verma and Dr. Singh have served on advisory boards for St. Jude.

[email protected]

BARCELONA – Intensive perioperative statin therapy in patients undergoing CABG surgery doesn’t protect against postop atrial fibrillation or myocardial injury, according to a large randomized clinical trial hailed as the "definitive" study addressing this issue.

"There are many reasons why these patients should be put on statin treatment, but the prevention of postop complications is not one of them," Dr. Barbara Casadei said in presenting the findings of the Statin Therapy in Cardiac Surgery (STICS) trial at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.

The STICS results are at odds with conventional wisdom. ESC guidelines give a favorable class IIa, level of evidence B recommendation that "statins should be considered for prevention of new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting, either isolated or in combination with valvular interventions."

"STICS was a very carefully conducted, large scale, robust study that I think has definitely closed the door on this issue," commented Dr. Keith A.A. Fox, professor of cardiology at the University of Edinburgh and chair of the scientific and clinical program committee at ESC Congress 2014.

STICS was a double-blind prospective trial in which 1,922 patients scheduled for elective CABG were randomized to 20 mg per day of rosuvastatin (Crestor) or placebo starting up to 8 days prior to surgery and continued for 5 days postop. All participants were in sinus rhythm preoperatively, with no history of AF, said Dr. Casadei, professor of cardiovascular medicine at the University of Oxford, England.

The two coprimary endpoints in STICS were the incidence of new-onset AF during 5 days of postop Holter monitoring, and evidence of postop myocardial injury as demonstrated in serial troponin I assays.

Postop AF occurred in 21% of those given high-intensity therapy with rosuvastatin and 20% of placebo-treated controls. There was no subgroup where rosuvastatin was protective (see graphic).

Troponin I measurements obtained 6, 24, 48, and 120 hours postop showed areas under the curve that were superimposable in the two study groups, meaning perioperative high-dose statin therapy provided absolutely no protection against postop cardiac muscle injury.

Mean hospital length of stay and ICU time didn’t differ between the two groups, either.

The impetus for conducting STICS was recognition that the guidelines’ endorsement of perioperative high-dose statin therapy in conjunction with cardiac surgery was based upon a series of small randomized trials with serious limitations. Although the results of a meta-analysis of the 14 prior trials looked impressive at first glance – a 17% incidence of postop AF in statin-treated patients, compared with 30% in controls, for a near-halving of the risk of this important complication – these 14 studies totaled 1,300 patients, and there were many methodologic shortcomings.

The STICS researchers hypothesized that a large, well-designed trial – bigger than all previous studies combined – would shore up the previously shaky supporting evidence and perhaps provide grounds for statins to win a new indication from regulatory agencies. Post-CABG AF is associated with a doubled risk of stroke and mortality, and excess hospital costs of $8,000-$18,000 dollars per patient.

Discussant Dr. Paulus Kirchhof, a member of the task force that developed the current ESC guidelines (Europace 2010;12:1360-420), said those guidelines now clearly need to be revisited. Beyond that, he added, STICS provides important new contributions in understanding the pathophysiology of AF.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

"We know that AF is caused by several vicious circles, and we believe that inflammation could influence those and cause AF. And we also thought that postop AF was the condition where inflammation plays the biggest role. Based upon the negative results with this anti-inflammatory intervention, I think we have to question this concept a bit," said Dr. Kirchhof, professor of cardiovascular sciences at the University of Birmingham, England.

Dr. Casadei countered that she’s not ready to write off postop inflammation entirely as a major trigger of new-onset AF following CABG.

"The inflammation is there. We know from experimental work in animals that there is a strong association between inflammation and postop atrial fibrillation, but whether the association is causal, I think, is still debated. However, it may be that the anti-inflammatory effect of statins is not sufficiently strong to actually prevent this complication," she said.

Discussant Dr. Steven Nissen praised STICS as "an outstanding trial."

"I also think there’s a terribly important lesson here, which is the power of self-delusion in medicine. When we base our guidelines on small, poorly controlled trials, we are often making mistakes. This is one of countless examples where when someone finally does a careful, thoughtful trial, we find out that something that people believe just isn’t true. We can’t cut corners with evidence. We need good randomized trials," declared Dr. Nissen, chair of the department of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic.

The STICS trial was funded primarily by the British Heart Foundation, the Oxford Biomedical Research Center, and the UK Medical Research Council. In addition, Dr. Casadei reported receiving an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca in conjunction with the trial.

[email protected]

BARCELONA – Intensive perioperative statin therapy in patients undergoing CABG surgery doesn’t protect against postop atrial fibrillation or myocardial injury, according to a large randomized clinical trial hailed as the "definitive" study addressing this issue.

"There are many reasons why these patients should be put on statin treatment, but the prevention of postop complications is not one of them," Dr. Barbara Casadei said in presenting the findings of the Statin Therapy in Cardiac Surgery (STICS) trial at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.

The STICS results are at odds with conventional wisdom. ESC guidelines give a favorable class IIa, level of evidence B recommendation that "statins should be considered for prevention of new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting, either isolated or in combination with valvular interventions."

"STICS was a very carefully conducted, large scale, robust study that I think has definitely closed the door on this issue," commented Dr. Keith A.A. Fox, professor of cardiology at the University of Edinburgh and chair of the scientific and clinical program committee at ESC Congress 2014.

STICS was a double-blind prospective trial in which 1,922 patients scheduled for elective CABG were randomized to 20 mg per day of rosuvastatin (Crestor) or placebo starting up to 8 days prior to surgery and continued for 5 days postop. All participants were in sinus rhythm preoperatively, with no history of AF, said Dr. Casadei, professor of cardiovascular medicine at the University of Oxford, England.

The two coprimary endpoints in STICS were the incidence of new-onset AF during 5 days of postop Holter monitoring, and evidence of postop myocardial injury as demonstrated in serial troponin I assays.

Postop AF occurred in 21% of those given high-intensity therapy with rosuvastatin and 20% of placebo-treated controls. There was no subgroup where rosuvastatin was protective (see graphic).

Troponin I measurements obtained 6, 24, 48, and 120 hours postop showed areas under the curve that were superimposable in the two study groups, meaning perioperative high-dose statin therapy provided absolutely no protection against postop cardiac muscle injury.

Mean hospital length of stay and ICU time didn’t differ between the two groups, either.

The impetus for conducting STICS was recognition that the guidelines’ endorsement of perioperative high-dose statin therapy in conjunction with cardiac surgery was based upon a series of small randomized trials with serious limitations. Although the results of a meta-analysis of the 14 prior trials looked impressive at first glance – a 17% incidence of postop AF in statin-treated patients, compared with 30% in controls, for a near-halving of the risk of this important complication – these 14 studies totaled 1,300 patients, and there were many methodologic shortcomings.

The STICS researchers hypothesized that a large, well-designed trial – bigger than all previous studies combined – would shore up the previously shaky supporting evidence and perhaps provide grounds for statins to win a new indication from regulatory agencies. Post-CABG AF is associated with a doubled risk of stroke and mortality, and excess hospital costs of $8,000-$18,000 dollars per patient.

Discussant Dr. Paulus Kirchhof, a member of the task force that developed the current ESC guidelines (Europace 2010;12:1360-420), said those guidelines now clearly need to be revisited. Beyond that, he added, STICS provides important new contributions in understanding the pathophysiology of AF.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

"We know that AF is caused by several vicious circles, and we believe that inflammation could influence those and cause AF. And we also thought that postop AF was the condition where inflammation plays the biggest role. Based upon the negative results with this anti-inflammatory intervention, I think we have to question this concept a bit," said Dr. Kirchhof, professor of cardiovascular sciences at the University of Birmingham, England.

Dr. Casadei countered that she’s not ready to write off postop inflammation entirely as a major trigger of new-onset AF following CABG.

"The inflammation is there. We know from experimental work in animals that there is a strong association between inflammation and postop atrial fibrillation, but whether the association is causal, I think, is still debated. However, it may be that the anti-inflammatory effect of statins is not sufficiently strong to actually prevent this complication," she said.

Discussant Dr. Steven Nissen praised STICS as "an outstanding trial."

"I also think there’s a terribly important lesson here, which is the power of self-delusion in medicine. When we base our guidelines on small, poorly controlled trials, we are often making mistakes. This is one of countless examples where when someone finally does a careful, thoughtful trial, we find out that something that people believe just isn’t true. We can’t cut corners with evidence. We need good randomized trials," declared Dr. Nissen, chair of the department of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic.

The STICS trial was funded primarily by the British Heart Foundation, the Oxford Biomedical Research Center, and the UK Medical Research Council. In addition, Dr. Casadei reported receiving an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca in conjunction with the trial.

[email protected]

BARCELONA – Intensive perioperative statin therapy in patients undergoing CABG surgery doesn’t protect against postop atrial fibrillation or myocardial injury, according to a large randomized clinical trial hailed as the "definitive" study addressing this issue.

"There are many reasons why these patients should be put on statin treatment, but the prevention of postop complications is not one of them," Dr. Barbara Casadei said in presenting the findings of the Statin Therapy in Cardiac Surgery (STICS) trial at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.

The STICS results are at odds with conventional wisdom. ESC guidelines give a favorable class IIa, level of evidence B recommendation that "statins should be considered for prevention of new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting, either isolated or in combination with valvular interventions."

"STICS was a very carefully conducted, large scale, robust study that I think has definitely closed the door on this issue," commented Dr. Keith A.A. Fox, professor of cardiology at the University of Edinburgh and chair of the scientific and clinical program committee at ESC Congress 2014.

STICS was a double-blind prospective trial in which 1,922 patients scheduled for elective CABG were randomized to 20 mg per day of rosuvastatin (Crestor) or placebo starting up to 8 days prior to surgery and continued for 5 days postop. All participants were in sinus rhythm preoperatively, with no history of AF, said Dr. Casadei, professor of cardiovascular medicine at the University of Oxford, England.

The two coprimary endpoints in STICS were the incidence of new-onset AF during 5 days of postop Holter monitoring, and evidence of postop myocardial injury as demonstrated in serial troponin I assays.

Postop AF occurred in 21% of those given high-intensity therapy with rosuvastatin and 20% of placebo-treated controls. There was no subgroup where rosuvastatin was protective (see graphic).

Troponin I measurements obtained 6, 24, 48, and 120 hours postop showed areas under the curve that were superimposable in the two study groups, meaning perioperative high-dose statin therapy provided absolutely no protection against postop cardiac muscle injury.

Mean hospital length of stay and ICU time didn’t differ between the two groups, either.

The impetus for conducting STICS was recognition that the guidelines’ endorsement of perioperative high-dose statin therapy in conjunction with cardiac surgery was based upon a series of small randomized trials with serious limitations. Although the results of a meta-analysis of the 14 prior trials looked impressive at first glance – a 17% incidence of postop AF in statin-treated patients, compared with 30% in controls, for a near-halving of the risk of this important complication – these 14 studies totaled 1,300 patients, and there were many methodologic shortcomings.

The STICS researchers hypothesized that a large, well-designed trial – bigger than all previous studies combined – would shore up the previously shaky supporting evidence and perhaps provide grounds for statins to win a new indication from regulatory agencies. Post-CABG AF is associated with a doubled risk of stroke and mortality, and excess hospital costs of $8,000-$18,000 dollars per patient.

Discussant Dr. Paulus Kirchhof, a member of the task force that developed the current ESC guidelines (Europace 2010;12:1360-420), said those guidelines now clearly need to be revisited. Beyond that, he added, STICS provides important new contributions in understanding the pathophysiology of AF.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

"We know that AF is caused by several vicious circles, and we believe that inflammation could influence those and cause AF. And we also thought that postop AF was the condition where inflammation plays the biggest role. Based upon the negative results with this anti-inflammatory intervention, I think we have to question this concept a bit," said Dr. Kirchhof, professor of cardiovascular sciences at the University of Birmingham, England.

Dr. Casadei countered that she’s not ready to write off postop inflammation entirely as a major trigger of new-onset AF following CABG.

"The inflammation is there. We know from experimental work in animals that there is a strong association between inflammation and postop atrial fibrillation, but whether the association is causal, I think, is still debated. However, it may be that the anti-inflammatory effect of statins is not sufficiently strong to actually prevent this complication," she said.

Discussant Dr. Steven Nissen praised STICS as "an outstanding trial."

"I also think there’s a terribly important lesson here, which is the power of self-delusion in medicine. When we base our guidelines on small, poorly controlled trials, we are often making mistakes. This is one of countless examples where when someone finally does a careful, thoughtful trial, we find out that something that people believe just isn’t true. We can’t cut corners with evidence. We need good randomized trials," declared Dr. Nissen, chair of the department of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic.

The STICS trial was funded primarily by the British Heart Foundation, the Oxford Biomedical Research Center, and the UK Medical Research Council. In addition, Dr. Casadei reported receiving an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca in conjunction with the trial.

[email protected]

Case Report

A 65-year-old man presented to the dermatology department for treatment of a scaly rash on the face and scalp. A diagnosis of seborrheic dermatitis was made, and he was prescribed ketoconazole cream 2% and shampoo 2%. Two days later, the patient presented to the emergency department for facial swelling and pruritus, which began 1 day after he began using the ketoconazole cream and shampoo. He reported itching and burning on the face that began within several hours of application followed by progressive facial edema. The patient denied shortness of breath or swelling of the tongue. Physical examination revealed mild facial induration with erythematous plaques on the bilateral cheeks, forehead, and eyelids. The patient was instructed to stop using the ketoconazole cream and shampoo. Within several days of discontinuing use of the ketoconazole products, the dermatitis resolved following treatment with oral diphenhydramine and topical desonide.

Review of the patient’s medical record revealed several likely relevant incidences of undiagnosed recurrent dermatitis. Approximately 2 years earlier, the patient had called his primary care provider to report pain, burning, redness, and itching in the right buttock area following use of ketoconazole cream that the physician had prescribed. Allergic contact dermatitis also had been documented in the patient’s dermatology problem list approximately 1.5 years prior to the current presentation, though a likely causative agent was not listed. Approximately 3 months prior to the current presentation, the patient presented with lower leg rash and edema with documentation of possible allergic reaction to ketoconazole cream.

The patient was patch tested several weeks after discontinuation of the ketoconazole products using the 2012 North American Contact Dermatitis Group series (70 allergens), a supplemental series (36 allergens), an antifungal series (10 allergens), and personal products including ketoconazole cream and shampoo (diluted 1:100). Clinically relevant reactions at 72 hours included an extreme reaction (+++) to the patient’s personal ketoconazole cream 2% (E. Fougera & Co)(Figure 1), and strong reactions (++) to purified ketoconazole 5% in petrolatum and ketoconazole cream 2% (E. Fougera & Co) in an antifungal series (Figure 2). A doubtful reaction to methyl methacrylate was not deemed clinically relevant. No reactions were noted to terbinafine cream 1%, clotrimazole cream 1%, nystatin cream, nystatin ointment, econazole nitrate cream 1%, miconazole nitrate cream 2%, tolnaftate cream 1%, or purified clotrimazole 1% in petrolatum.

Figure 1. Reading at 72 hours of patient’s personal products (ketoconazole cream 2% and ketoconazole shampoo 2%).

Figure 2. Reading at 72 hours of an antifungal series (ketoconazole cream 2% and purified ketocona-zole 5% in petrolatum).

Comment

Ketoconazole is a widely used antifungal but rarely is reported as a cause of allergic contact dermatitis. Allergies to inactive ingredients, especially vehicles and preservatives, are more common than allergies to ketoconazole itself. In our patient, allergy to inactive ingredients was ruled out by negative reactions to individual constituents and/or negative reactions to other products containing those ingredients. A literature review via Ovid using the search terms ketoconazole, allergic contact dermatitis, and allergy found 4 reports involving 9 documented patients with type IV hypersensitivity to ketoconazole,^1-4 and 1 report of 2 patients who developed anaphylaxis from oral ketoconazole.¹ Of the 9 dermatitis cases, 3 patients had positive patch tests to only ketoconazole with no reactions to other imidazoles.^2,3 Monoallergy to clotrimazole also has been reported.⁵ A study by Dooms-Goossens et al⁴ showed that ketoconazole ranked seventh of 11 imidazole derivatives in its frequency to cause allergic contact dermatitis and did not demonstrate statistically significant cross-reactivity with other imidazoles; cross-reactivity usually occurred with miconazole and sulconazole.

Conclusion

This case of contact dermatitis to ketoconazole demonstrates the importance of patch testing with personal products as well as the unpredictability of cross-reactions within the imidazole class of antifungals.

Acknowledgment

This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Case Report

A 65-year-old man presented to the dermatology department for treatment of a scaly rash on the face and scalp. A diagnosis of seborrheic dermatitis was made, and he was prescribed ketoconazole cream 2% and shampoo 2%. Two days later, the patient presented to the emergency department for facial swelling and pruritus, which began 1 day after he began using the ketoconazole cream and shampoo. He reported itching and burning on the face that began within several hours of application followed by progressive facial edema. The patient denied shortness of breath or swelling of the tongue. Physical examination revealed mild facial induration with erythematous plaques on the bilateral cheeks, forehead, and eyelids. The patient was instructed to stop using the ketoconazole cream and shampoo. Within several days of discontinuing use of the ketoconazole products, the dermatitis resolved following treatment with oral diphenhydramine and topical desonide.

Review of the patient’s medical record revealed several likely relevant incidences of undiagnosed recurrent dermatitis. Approximately 2 years earlier, the patient had called his primary care provider to report pain, burning, redness, and itching in the right buttock area following use of ketoconazole cream that the physician had prescribed. Allergic contact dermatitis also had been documented in the patient’s dermatology problem list approximately 1.5 years prior to the current presentation, though a likely causative agent was not listed. Approximately 3 months prior to the current presentation, the patient presented with lower leg rash and edema with documentation of possible allergic reaction to ketoconazole cream.

The patient was patch tested several weeks after discontinuation of the ketoconazole products using the 2012 North American Contact Dermatitis Group series (70 allergens), a supplemental series (36 allergens), an antifungal series (10 allergens), and personal products including ketoconazole cream and shampoo (diluted 1:100). Clinically relevant reactions at 72 hours included an extreme reaction (+++) to the patient’s personal ketoconazole cream 2% (E. Fougera & Co)(Figure 1), and strong reactions (++) to purified ketoconazole 5% in petrolatum and ketoconazole cream 2% (E. Fougera & Co) in an antifungal series (Figure 2). A doubtful reaction to methyl methacrylate was not deemed clinically relevant. No reactions were noted to terbinafine cream 1%, clotrimazole cream 1%, nystatin cream, nystatin ointment, econazole nitrate cream 1%, miconazole nitrate cream 2%, tolnaftate cream 1%, or purified clotrimazole 1% in petrolatum.

Figure 1. Reading at 72 hours of patient’s personal products (ketoconazole cream 2% and ketoconazole shampoo 2%).

Figure 2. Reading at 72 hours of an antifungal series (ketoconazole cream 2% and purified ketocona-zole 5% in petrolatum).

Comment

Ketoconazole is a widely used antifungal but rarely is reported as a cause of allergic contact dermatitis. Allergies to inactive ingredients, especially vehicles and preservatives, are more common than allergies to ketoconazole itself. In our patient, allergy to inactive ingredients was ruled out by negative reactions to individual constituents and/or negative reactions to other products containing those ingredients. A literature review via Ovid using the search terms ketoconazole, allergic contact dermatitis, and allergy found 4 reports involving 9 documented patients with type IV hypersensitivity to ketoconazole,^1-4 and 1 report of 2 patients who developed anaphylaxis from oral ketoconazole.¹ Of the 9 dermatitis cases, 3 patients had positive patch tests to only ketoconazole with no reactions to other imidazoles.^2,3 Monoallergy to clotrimazole also has been reported.⁵ A study by Dooms-Goossens et al⁴ showed that ketoconazole ranked seventh of 11 imidazole derivatives in its frequency to cause allergic contact dermatitis and did not demonstrate statistically significant cross-reactivity with other imidazoles; cross-reactivity usually occurred with miconazole and sulconazole.

Conclusion

This case of contact dermatitis to ketoconazole demonstrates the importance of patch testing with personal products as well as the unpredictability of cross-reactions within the imidazole class of antifungals.

Acknowledgment

This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Case Report

A 65-year-old man presented to the dermatology department for treatment of a scaly rash on the face and scalp. A diagnosis of seborrheic dermatitis was made, and he was prescribed ketoconazole cream 2% and shampoo 2%. Two days later, the patient presented to the emergency department for facial swelling and pruritus, which began 1 day after he began using the ketoconazole cream and shampoo. He reported itching and burning on the face that began within several hours of application followed by progressive facial edema. The patient denied shortness of breath or swelling of the tongue. Physical examination revealed mild facial induration with erythematous plaques on the bilateral cheeks, forehead, and eyelids. The patient was instructed to stop using the ketoconazole cream and shampoo. Within several days of discontinuing use of the ketoconazole products, the dermatitis resolved following treatment with oral diphenhydramine and topical desonide.

Review of the patient’s medical record revealed several likely relevant incidences of undiagnosed recurrent dermatitis. Approximately 2 years earlier, the patient had called his primary care provider to report pain, burning, redness, and itching in the right buttock area following use of ketoconazole cream that the physician had prescribed. Allergic contact dermatitis also had been documented in the patient’s dermatology problem list approximately 1.5 years prior to the current presentation, though a likely causative agent was not listed. Approximately 3 months prior to the current presentation, the patient presented with lower leg rash and edema with documentation of possible allergic reaction to ketoconazole cream.

The patient was patch tested several weeks after discontinuation of the ketoconazole products using the 2012 North American Contact Dermatitis Group series (70 allergens), a supplemental series (36 allergens), an antifungal series (10 allergens), and personal products including ketoconazole cream and shampoo (diluted 1:100). Clinically relevant reactions at 72 hours included an extreme reaction (+++) to the patient’s personal ketoconazole cream 2% (E. Fougera & Co)(Figure 1), and strong reactions (++) to purified ketoconazole 5% in petrolatum and ketoconazole cream 2% (E. Fougera & Co) in an antifungal series (Figure 2). A doubtful reaction to methyl methacrylate was not deemed clinically relevant. No reactions were noted to terbinafine cream 1%, clotrimazole cream 1%, nystatin cream, nystatin ointment, econazole nitrate cream 1%, miconazole nitrate cream 2%, tolnaftate cream 1%, or purified clotrimazole 1% in petrolatum.

Figure 1. Reading at 72 hours of patient’s personal products (ketoconazole cream 2% and ketoconazole shampoo 2%).

Figure 2. Reading at 72 hours of an antifungal series (ketoconazole cream 2% and purified ketocona-zole 5% in petrolatum).

Comment

Ketoconazole is a widely used antifungal but rarely is reported as a cause of allergic contact dermatitis. Allergies to inactive ingredients, especially vehicles and preservatives, are more common than allergies to ketoconazole itself. In our patient, allergy to inactive ingredients was ruled out by negative reactions to individual constituents and/or negative reactions to other products containing those ingredients. A literature review via Ovid using the search terms ketoconazole, allergic contact dermatitis, and allergy found 4 reports involving 9 documented patients with type IV hypersensitivity to ketoconazole,^1-4 and 1 report of 2 patients who developed anaphylaxis from oral ketoconazole.¹ Of the 9 dermatitis cases, 3 patients had positive patch tests to only ketoconazole with no reactions to other imidazoles.^2,3 Monoallergy to clotrimazole also has been reported.⁵ A study by Dooms-Goossens et al⁴ showed that ketoconazole ranked seventh of 11 imidazole derivatives in its frequency to cause allergic contact dermatitis and did not demonstrate statistically significant cross-reactivity with other imidazoles; cross-reactivity usually occurred with miconazole and sulconazole.

Conclusion

This case of contact dermatitis to ketoconazole demonstrates the importance of patch testing with personal products as well as the unpredictability of cross-reactions within the imidazole class of antifungals.

Acknowledgment

This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Thomas Barker, PhD, with

bacteria needed to create

the platelet-like particles

Credit: Gary Meek

Researchers say they’ve developed a new class of synthetic platelet-like particles that can augment natural blood clotting.

The particles are based on soft and deformable hydrogel materials and measure about 1 micron in diameter.

Testing in animal models and a simulated circulatory system suggested the particles are effective at slowing bleeding and can safely circulate in the bloodstream.

The particles have been tested in human blood but not in clinical trials.

Ashley Brown, PhD, of the Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University in Atlanta, and her colleagues described the research involving these particles in Nature Materials.

The team noted that, when fibrinogen proteins receive the right signals from thrombin, they polymerize at the site of bleeding to form a clot. The synthetic platelet-like particles use the same trigger, so they are activated only when the body’s natural clotting process is initiated.

To create that trigger, the researchers employed molecular evolution. They developed an antibody that could be attached to the hydrogel particles to change their form when they encounter thrombin-activated fibrin. The resulting antibody has a high affinity for the polymerized form of fibrin and a low affinity for the precursor material.

“Fibrin production is on the back end of the clotting process, so we feel that it is a safer place to try to interact with it,” said study author Thomas Barker, PhD, of Georgia Tech and Emory University.

“The specificity of this material provides a very important advantage in triggering clotting at just the right time.”

The researchers tested the platelet-like particles in an animal model and a microfluidic chamber designed to simulate conditions within the body’s circulatory system.

The team used the chamber to study normal human blood, as well as blood that had been depleted of its natural platelets. In platelet-rich blood, clots formed as expected, and blood without platelets did not form clots. When the platelet-like particles were added to the platelet-depleted blood, it was able to clot.

The researchers also tested blood from infants who had received anticoagulant treatment prior to undergoing open heart surgery. When platelet-like particles were added to this blood, it was able to form clots.

Finally, the team performed safety testing on blood from hemophilia patients. Because their blood lacked the triggers needed to cause fibrin formation, the particles had no effect.

What ultimately happens to the particles circulating in the bloodstream will be the topic of future research, Dr Brown said. Particles of similar size and composition are normally eliminated from the body.

While the platelet-like particles lack many features of natural platelets, the researchers were surprised to find one property in common. Clots formed by natural platelets begin to contract over a period of hours, beginning the body’s repair process. Clots formed from the synthetic particles also contract, but over a longer period of time.

These particles were originally developed to be used on the battlefield by wounded soldiers, who might self-administer them using a device about the size of a smartphone. But the researchers believe the particles could also reduce the need for platelet transfusions in patients undergoing chemotherapy or bypass surgery, and in those with certain blood disorders.

“For a patient with insufficient platelets due to bleeding or an inherited disorder, physicians often have to resort to platelet transfusions, which can be difficult to obtain,” said study author Wilbur Lam, MD, PhD, of the Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University.

“These particles could potentially be a way to obviate the need for a transfusion. Though they don’t have all the assets of natural platelets, a number of intriguing experiments have shown that the particles help augment the clotting process.”

Thomas Barker, PhD, with

bacteria needed to create

the platelet-like particles

Credit: Gary Meek

Researchers say they’ve developed a new class of synthetic platelet-like particles that can augment natural blood clotting.

The particles are based on soft and deformable hydrogel materials and measure about 1 micron in diameter.

Testing in animal models and a simulated circulatory system suggested the particles are effective at slowing bleeding and can safely circulate in the bloodstream.

The particles have been tested in human blood but not in clinical trials.

Ashley Brown, PhD, of the Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University in Atlanta, and her colleagues described the research involving these particles in Nature Materials.

The team noted that, when fibrinogen proteins receive the right signals from thrombin, they polymerize at the site of bleeding to form a clot. The synthetic platelet-like particles use the same trigger, so they are activated only when the body’s natural clotting process is initiated.

To create that trigger, the researchers employed molecular evolution. They developed an antibody that could be attached to the hydrogel particles to change their form when they encounter thrombin-activated fibrin. The resulting antibody has a high affinity for the polymerized form of fibrin and a low affinity for the precursor material.

“Fibrin production is on the back end of the clotting process, so we feel that it is a safer place to try to interact with it,” said study author Thomas Barker, PhD, of Georgia Tech and Emory University.

“The specificity of this material provides a very important advantage in triggering clotting at just the right time.”

The researchers tested the platelet-like particles in an animal model and a microfluidic chamber designed to simulate conditions within the body’s circulatory system.

The team used the chamber to study normal human blood, as well as blood that had been depleted of its natural platelets. In platelet-rich blood, clots formed as expected, and blood without platelets did not form clots. When the platelet-like particles were added to the platelet-depleted blood, it was able to clot.

The researchers also tested blood from infants who had received anticoagulant treatment prior to undergoing open heart surgery. When platelet-like particles were added to this blood, it was able to form clots.

Finally, the team performed safety testing on blood from hemophilia patients. Because their blood lacked the triggers needed to cause fibrin formation, the particles had no effect.

What ultimately happens to the particles circulating in the bloodstream will be the topic of future research, Dr Brown said. Particles of similar size and composition are normally eliminated from the body.

While the platelet-like particles lack many features of natural platelets, the researchers were surprised to find one property in common. Clots formed by natural platelets begin to contract over a period of hours, beginning the body’s repair process. Clots formed from the synthetic particles also contract, but over a longer period of time.

These particles were originally developed to be used on the battlefield by wounded soldiers, who might self-administer them using a device about the size of a smartphone. But the researchers believe the particles could also reduce the need for platelet transfusions in patients undergoing chemotherapy or bypass surgery, and in those with certain blood disorders.

“For a patient with insufficient platelets due to bleeding or an inherited disorder, physicians often have to resort to platelet transfusions, which can be difficult to obtain,” said study author Wilbur Lam, MD, PhD, of the Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University.

“These particles could potentially be a way to obviate the need for a transfusion. Though they don’t have all the assets of natural platelets, a number of intriguing experiments have shown that the particles help augment the clotting process.”

Thomas Barker, PhD, with

bacteria needed to create

the platelet-like particles

Credit: Gary Meek

Researchers say they’ve developed a new class of synthetic platelet-like particles that can augment natural blood clotting.

The particles are based on soft and deformable hydrogel materials and measure about 1 micron in diameter.

Testing in animal models and a simulated circulatory system suggested the particles are effective at slowing bleeding and can safely circulate in the bloodstream.

The particles have been tested in human blood but not in clinical trials.

Ashley Brown, PhD, of the Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University in Atlanta, and her colleagues described the research involving these particles in Nature Materials.

The team noted that, when fibrinogen proteins receive the right signals from thrombin, they polymerize at the site of bleeding to form a clot. The synthetic platelet-like particles use the same trigger, so they are activated only when the body’s natural clotting process is initiated.

To create that trigger, the researchers employed molecular evolution. They developed an antibody that could be attached to the hydrogel particles to change their form when they encounter thrombin-activated fibrin. The resulting antibody has a high affinity for the polymerized form of fibrin and a low affinity for the precursor material.

“Fibrin production is on the back end of the clotting process, so we feel that it is a safer place to try to interact with it,” said study author Thomas Barker, PhD, of Georgia Tech and Emory University.

“The specificity of this material provides a very important advantage in triggering clotting at just the right time.”

The researchers tested the platelet-like particles in an animal model and a microfluidic chamber designed to simulate conditions within the body’s circulatory system.

The team used the chamber to study normal human blood, as well as blood that had been depleted of its natural platelets. In platelet-rich blood, clots formed as expected, and blood without platelets did not form clots. When the platelet-like particles were added to the platelet-depleted blood, it was able to clot.

The researchers also tested blood from infants who had received anticoagulant treatment prior to undergoing open heart surgery. When platelet-like particles were added to this blood, it was able to form clots.

Finally, the team performed safety testing on blood from hemophilia patients. Because their blood lacked the triggers needed to cause fibrin formation, the particles had no effect.

What ultimately happens to the particles circulating in the bloodstream will be the topic of future research, Dr Brown said. Particles of similar size and composition are normally eliminated from the body.

While the platelet-like particles lack many features of natural platelets, the researchers were surprised to find one property in common. Clots formed by natural platelets begin to contract over a period of hours, beginning the body’s repair process. Clots formed from the synthetic particles also contract, but over a longer period of time.

These particles were originally developed to be used on the battlefield by wounded soldiers, who might self-administer them using a device about the size of a smartphone. But the researchers believe the particles could also reduce the need for platelet transfusions in patients undergoing chemotherapy or bypass surgery, and in those with certain blood disorders.

“For a patient with insufficient platelets due to bleeding or an inherited disorder, physicians often have to resort to platelet transfusions, which can be difficult to obtain,” said study author Wilbur Lam, MD, PhD, of the Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University.

“These particles could potentially be a way to obviate the need for a transfusion. Though they don’t have all the assets of natural platelets, a number of intriguing experiments have shown that the particles help augment the clotting process.”