2014 Update on abnormal uterine bleeding

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 11:03
Display Headline
2014 Update on abnormal uterine bleeding

As recently defined by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)—and endorsed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists—the term “abnormal uterine bleeding” (AUB) now describes any departure from normal menstrual bleeding.1 To determine the most appropriate intervention for this widespread problem, FIGO proposed that clinicians consider potential contributors to the clinical problem by investigating and categorizing patients according to the following system:

 

  • Polyp
  • Adenomyosis
  • Leiomyoma
  • Malignancy and hyperplasia
  • Coagulopathy
  • Ovulatory disorders
  • Endometrial dysfunction
  • Iatrogenic
  • Not otherwise classified.

A given individual may be found to have one or more of these features, but not all of the features may contribute to the AUB. To facilitate their use, these nine causes are more commonly identified using the acronym PALM-COEIN.

In this article, I focus on three of these categories, presenting recent data on AUB associated with leiomyomata (AUB-L) or adenomyosis (AUB-A), and AUB of an iatrogenic nature (AUB-I).

AUB-L: SATISFACTION RATES ARE SIMILAR 5 YEARS AFTER FIBROID TREATMENT BY SURGERY OR UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION

Gupta JK, Sinha A, Lumsden MA, Hickey M. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:CD005073. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005073.pub3.

Women who undergo uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids are just as satisfied with the outcome as women treated with hysterectomy or myomectomy, according to this 2012 review from the Cochrane Database.

Gupta and colleagues found similar patient-satisfaction rates at 5 years (odds ratio [OR] 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45–1.8), although women undergoing UAE were more likely to require additional interventions within 2 years (56 additional interventions per 1,000 women for surgery vs 250 per 1,000 women for UAE; OR, 5.64).

Details and general findings
Gupta and colleagues selected randomized, controlled trials comparing UAE with surgery:

 

  • three trials of UAE versus abdominal hysterectomy (n = 291)
  • one trial of UAE versus hysterectomy or myomectomy (the specific surgery was determined by patient preference) (n = 157)
  • one trial of UAE versus myomectomy in women desiring future childbearing (n = 121).

In these trials, UAE was bilateral and involved the use of permanent embolic material.

Among the findings:

 

  • Costs were lower with UAE, as assessed by measuring the duration of the procedure, length of hospitalization, and time to resumption of normal activities.
  • Ovarian-failure rates were comparable between women in the UAE and surgery groups. Ovarian function was assessed by measuring follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), although FSH thresholds varied in some of the studies.
  • Pregnancy was less likely after UAE than after myomectomy. In the trial comparing UAE with myomectomy, 26 women later tried to conceive after UAE versus 40 after myomectomy. Significantly fewer women became pregnant after UAE (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10–0.85).

Related Article: Update on Fertility  G. David Adamson, MD; Mary E. Abusief, MD (February 2014)

Bleeding outcomes were not measured
Strengths of this systematic review are its inclusion of high-quality, randomized, controlled trials and its assessment of ovarian-failure rates. However, a major weakness is the fact that its design does not allow for discrete evaluation of bleeding outcomes. Nor can its findings be broken down by the type of leiomyoma being treated.

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
This review demonstrates that women are satisfied with outcomes five years after UAE and that ovarian failure is not more common after UAE than after surgery. Although the available evidence demonstrates that pregnancy following UAE is possible, women requiring a surgical procedure for AUB-L who are uncertain about their childbearing plans or who are hoping to conceive should be encouraged to select myomectomy as their intervention of choice.

 

AUB-A: FOR ADENOMYOSIS-ASSOCIATED AUB, CONSIDER THE LNG-IUS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO HYSTERECTOMY

Ozdegirmenci O, Kayikcioglu F, Akgul MA, et al. Comparison of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysterectomy on efficacy and quality of life in patients with adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):497–502.

In a small randomized, controlled trial of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; Mirena) versus hysterectomy for adenomyosis-associated AUB, women allocated to the LNG-IUS experienced a reduction in bleeding and comparable gains in hemoglobin values during the first year of use. Both the LNG-IUS and hysterectomy improved health-related quality of life, but the LNG-IUS was associated with superior improvements in measures of psychological and social functioning.

Related Article: Update: Minimally invasive gynecology  Amy Garcia, MD (April 2013)

Details and general findings of the trial
Eighty-six women were enrolled in the trial after exclusion of endometrial pathology as a cause of their heavy menstrual bleeding and after transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings were consistent with the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Participants then were randomly assigned to undergo hysterectomy or insertion of an LNG-IUS (43 women in each group). At baseline, the mean (SD) age was 44.28 (4.36) years among women in the LNG-IUS group versus 46.38 (3.76) years among women undergoing hysterectomy (P = .032), a statistical difference that I suspect is not clinically significant.

 

 

Menstrual bleeding, hemoglobin levels, and quality of life were assessed prior to insertion or surgery, and again at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Eleven women in the hysterectomy group were lost to follow-up.

General findings of the trial include:

 

  • Women in the LNG-IUS group had a mean reduction in the volume of menstrual bleeding—as measured by the number of pads used—from two pads to one pad at 6 months, remaining at that level until 12 months. Serum hemoglobin levels increased from a median of just over
    11 g/dL at the time of insertion to 13 g/dL at 6 months and slightly higher at 12 months. In the five self-reported quality-of-life domains assessed (physical, psychological, social, environmental, and a national environmental domain), women using the LNG-IUS demonstrated improvement in all five.
  • Women in the hysterectomy group were treated using an abdominal surgical approach, with one patient experiencing postoperative wound infection that required secondary suture. Postoperative pathologic analysis found that 21 of these women (65.6%) had adenomyosis, six women (18.8%) had myomas, three women (9.4%) had both adenomyosis and a myoma, and two women (6.2%) had a normal uterus. Serum hemoglobin levels increased from a median of roughly 10.5 g/dL at the time of treatment to 13 g/dL at 6 months and slightly higher at 12 months. (There were no statistically significant differences in hemoglobin values between the LNG-IUS and hysterectomy groups at any point in the study.) Quality of life improved in three of the five domains assessed (physical and both environmental domains).

Although 11 women were lost to follow-up, this trial appeared to have an adequate sample size to examine the selected outcomes, and the population was well defined.

Two weaknesses were the limited follow-up (only 12 months) and the use of quality-of-life measures designed for a Turkish population (the trial was conducted in Turkey), which may or may not be fully applicable to a US population.

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
The relationship of adenomyosis to gynecologic symptoms, including heavy menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhea, needs further study. However, this trial confirmed that transvaginal ultrasound is helpful in the nonsurgical diagnosis of adenomyosis and suggests that the LNG-IUS may be as effective at 1 year as hysterectomy for the treatment of adenomyosis-associated heavy menstrual bleeding (AUB-A).
Clinicians who perform office-based ultrasound to assess AUB should familiarize themselves with the criteria for ultrasonic diagnosis of adenomyosis. These criteria include the presence of heterogeneous myometrial echogenicity, a loss of clarity of the endo-myometrial interface, typically radially oriented linear striations, the appearance of myometrial cysts, and an overall globular enlarged uterus characterized by asymmetric thickening of the myometrium.2
In patients with heavy menstrual bleeding who have these findings, particularly if there is coexistent dysmenorrhea and uterine tenderness, it behooves the clinician to consider the LNG-IUS as first-line therapy, especially for women who wish to preserve fertility, but also for women for whom fertility is not an issue.
There is some evidence that the therapeutic effect of the LNG-IUS containing 20 µg of levonorgestrel may start to fade at 2 or 3 years, a possibility that should be shared with patients.3 Other features, such as cavity size, thickness of the myometrium, and the coexistence of clinically relevant leiomyomas, have not been evaluated but may have an impact on the clinical response.

 

AUB-I: LOW-DOSE DOXYCYCLINE REDUCES THE TIME TO AMENORRHEA IN USERS OF CONTINUOUS ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES

Kaneshiro B, Edelman A, Carlson NE, Nichols M, Forbes MM, Jensen J. A randomized controlled trial of subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline to prevent unscheduled bleeding with continuous oral contraceptive pill use. Contraception. 2012;85(4):351–358.

Unscheduled bleeding is the most common complaint among women who use continuous combination oral contraceptives (OCs). Because unscheduled bleeding has been correlated with the upregulation of matrix metalloprotineases (MMPs), Kaneshiro and colleagues conducted a randomized, controlled trial of doxycycline (an MMP inhibitor) versus placebo among users of continuous OCs. The addition of doxycycline to the OC regimen did not significantly reduce unscheduled bleeding during the first 84 days of use, but it did shorten the time required to achieve amenorrhea (mean of 61.7 days for doxycycline vs 85.2 days for placebo; standard error [SE], 7.7 vs 6.7, respectively; P = .03).

Related Article: Big step forward and downward: An OC with 10 μg of estrogen  Robert L. Barbieri, MD (Editorial, May 2011)

Details and general findings of the trial
Participants (n = 65) were healthy women aged 18 to 45 years who had no contraindications to continuous use of combination OCs. Prior to enrollment, they all had used cyclic combination contraception (pill, patch, or ring) without unscheduled bleeding, thereby avoiding the “transition bleeding” that often occurs when continuous OCs are initiated.

 

 

All women in the trial were started on continuous OCs (20 µg ethinyl estradiol with 100 µg levonorgestrel; Aviane) and then randomly assigned to receive one of the following for 84 days in addition to the OC:

 

  • doxycycline 40 mg daily (controlled-release Oracea), a subantimicrobial dose
  • placebo.

After 84 days, doxycycline was discontinued, and participants were observed for an additional 28 days on the OC regimen alone for the documentation of bleeding patterns.

General findings:

 

  • The number of bleeding and spotting days decreased in both groups over the course of the study.
  • During the first 84 days of the trial, bleeding and spotting occurred among a median of 11 and 17 women in the doxycycline and placebo groups, respectively, and bleeding alone (without spotting) occurred in a median 3 and 4 women in the doxycycline and placebo groups, respectively.
  • During the 28-day observation period, bleeding and spotting occurred among a median of 0 and 6 women in the doxycycline and placebo groups, respectively. Bleeding alone (without spotting) was absent in both groups.
  • Women in the doxycycline group were significantly less likely to report side effects such as headache, depressed mood, and abdominal cramping. However, they were more likely to prefer continuous OCs without doxycycline, compared with women receiving placebo (16.1% vs 10.7%).

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
This trial increases our insight into AUB associated with the use of progestins and suggests that concomitant doxycycline may reduce unscheduled bleeding and spotting in women using continuous combination OCs. The trial was of adequate sample size for the primary outcomes, lending credence to its findings, although longer-term data would be helpful.
I have included this trial for two reasons:
It offers useful information regarding the mechanisms and potential prevention or reduction of AUB-I in users of continuous combined estrogen-progestin contraception.
Doxycycline is one of the agents covered in a Cochrane review of high-quality research into AUB-I in women using progestin-only products, including injectables, implantables, intrauterine systems, and oral agents.4 Estrogens have been shown to have some value in reducing breakthrough bleeding associated with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, and individual use of tranexamic acid or doxycycline has shown value in terminating an episode of breakthrough bleeding in women using progestin-only contraceptives.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK!
Share your thoughts on this article or on any topic relevant to ObGyns and women’s health practitioners. Tell us which topics you’d like to see covered in future issues, and what challenges you face in daily practice. We will consider publishing your letter and in a future issue.
Send your letter to: [email protected] Please include the city and state in which you practice.
Stay in touch! Your feedback is important to us!

References

 

 

  1. Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, Fraser IS; FIGO Working Group on Menstrual Disorders. The FIGO classification for causes of abnormal bleeding in the reproductive years. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2204–2208.
  2. Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, Balogun M, Khan KS. Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: Systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(11):1374–1384.
  3. Cho S, Nam A, Kim H, et al. Clinical effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in patients with adenomyosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(4):373.e1–e7.
  4. Abdel-Aleem H, d’Arcangues C, Vogelsong KM, Gaffield ML, Gulmezoglu AM. Treatment of vaginal bleeding irregularities induced by progestin-only contraceptives. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;10:CD003449. 
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Malcolm G. Munro, MD, is Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and Director of Gynecologic Services at Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Medical Center, in Los Angeles, California

The author reports that he is a consultant to Bayer HealthCare.

Issue
OBG Management - 26(3)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
27-32
Legacy Keywords
Malcolm G. Munro,abnormal uterine bleeding,AUB,fibroids, adenomyosis,progestins,International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics,FIGO,Polyp,adenomyosis,Leiomyoma,Malignancy and hyperplasia,Coagulopathy,Ovulatory disorders,Endometrial dysfunction,Iatrogenic,Not otherwise classified,PALM-COEIN,AUB-L,AUB-A,AUB-I,uterine artery embolization,UAE,hysterectomy,myomectomy,abdominal hysterectomy,ovarian-failure rates,pregnancy,LNG-IUS,levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system,Mirena,heavy menstrual bleeding,dysmenorrhea,oral contraceptive,OC,matrix metalloprotineases,MMPs,doxycycline,
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Malcolm G. Munro, MD, is Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and Director of Gynecologic Services at Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Medical Center, in Los Angeles, California

The author reports that he is a consultant to Bayer HealthCare.

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Malcolm G. Munro, MD, is Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and Director of Gynecologic Services at Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Medical Center, in Los Angeles, California

The author reports that he is a consultant to Bayer HealthCare.

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

As recently defined by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)—and endorsed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists—the term “abnormal uterine bleeding” (AUB) now describes any departure from normal menstrual bleeding.1 To determine the most appropriate intervention for this widespread problem, FIGO proposed that clinicians consider potential contributors to the clinical problem by investigating and categorizing patients according to the following system:

 

  • Polyp
  • Adenomyosis
  • Leiomyoma
  • Malignancy and hyperplasia
  • Coagulopathy
  • Ovulatory disorders
  • Endometrial dysfunction
  • Iatrogenic
  • Not otherwise classified.

A given individual may be found to have one or more of these features, but not all of the features may contribute to the AUB. To facilitate their use, these nine causes are more commonly identified using the acronym PALM-COEIN.

In this article, I focus on three of these categories, presenting recent data on AUB associated with leiomyomata (AUB-L) or adenomyosis (AUB-A), and AUB of an iatrogenic nature (AUB-I).

AUB-L: SATISFACTION RATES ARE SIMILAR 5 YEARS AFTER FIBROID TREATMENT BY SURGERY OR UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION

Gupta JK, Sinha A, Lumsden MA, Hickey M. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:CD005073. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005073.pub3.

Women who undergo uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids are just as satisfied with the outcome as women treated with hysterectomy or myomectomy, according to this 2012 review from the Cochrane Database.

Gupta and colleagues found similar patient-satisfaction rates at 5 years (odds ratio [OR] 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45–1.8), although women undergoing UAE were more likely to require additional interventions within 2 years (56 additional interventions per 1,000 women for surgery vs 250 per 1,000 women for UAE; OR, 5.64).

Details and general findings
Gupta and colleagues selected randomized, controlled trials comparing UAE with surgery:

 

  • three trials of UAE versus abdominal hysterectomy (n = 291)
  • one trial of UAE versus hysterectomy or myomectomy (the specific surgery was determined by patient preference) (n = 157)
  • one trial of UAE versus myomectomy in women desiring future childbearing (n = 121).

In these trials, UAE was bilateral and involved the use of permanent embolic material.

Among the findings:

 

  • Costs were lower with UAE, as assessed by measuring the duration of the procedure, length of hospitalization, and time to resumption of normal activities.
  • Ovarian-failure rates were comparable between women in the UAE and surgery groups. Ovarian function was assessed by measuring follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), although FSH thresholds varied in some of the studies.
  • Pregnancy was less likely after UAE than after myomectomy. In the trial comparing UAE with myomectomy, 26 women later tried to conceive after UAE versus 40 after myomectomy. Significantly fewer women became pregnant after UAE (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10–0.85).

Related Article: Update on Fertility  G. David Adamson, MD; Mary E. Abusief, MD (February 2014)

Bleeding outcomes were not measured
Strengths of this systematic review are its inclusion of high-quality, randomized, controlled trials and its assessment of ovarian-failure rates. However, a major weakness is the fact that its design does not allow for discrete evaluation of bleeding outcomes. Nor can its findings be broken down by the type of leiomyoma being treated.

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
This review demonstrates that women are satisfied with outcomes five years after UAE and that ovarian failure is not more common after UAE than after surgery. Although the available evidence demonstrates that pregnancy following UAE is possible, women requiring a surgical procedure for AUB-L who are uncertain about their childbearing plans or who are hoping to conceive should be encouraged to select myomectomy as their intervention of choice.

 

AUB-A: FOR ADENOMYOSIS-ASSOCIATED AUB, CONSIDER THE LNG-IUS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO HYSTERECTOMY

Ozdegirmenci O, Kayikcioglu F, Akgul MA, et al. Comparison of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysterectomy on efficacy and quality of life in patients with adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):497–502.

In a small randomized, controlled trial of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; Mirena) versus hysterectomy for adenomyosis-associated AUB, women allocated to the LNG-IUS experienced a reduction in bleeding and comparable gains in hemoglobin values during the first year of use. Both the LNG-IUS and hysterectomy improved health-related quality of life, but the LNG-IUS was associated with superior improvements in measures of psychological and social functioning.

Related Article: Update: Minimally invasive gynecology  Amy Garcia, MD (April 2013)

Details and general findings of the trial
Eighty-six women were enrolled in the trial after exclusion of endometrial pathology as a cause of their heavy menstrual bleeding and after transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings were consistent with the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Participants then were randomly assigned to undergo hysterectomy or insertion of an LNG-IUS (43 women in each group). At baseline, the mean (SD) age was 44.28 (4.36) years among women in the LNG-IUS group versus 46.38 (3.76) years among women undergoing hysterectomy (P = .032), a statistical difference that I suspect is not clinically significant.

 

 

Menstrual bleeding, hemoglobin levels, and quality of life were assessed prior to insertion or surgery, and again at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Eleven women in the hysterectomy group were lost to follow-up.

General findings of the trial include:

 

  • Women in the LNG-IUS group had a mean reduction in the volume of menstrual bleeding—as measured by the number of pads used—from two pads to one pad at 6 months, remaining at that level until 12 months. Serum hemoglobin levels increased from a median of just over
    11 g/dL at the time of insertion to 13 g/dL at 6 months and slightly higher at 12 months. In the five self-reported quality-of-life domains assessed (physical, psychological, social, environmental, and a national environmental domain), women using the LNG-IUS demonstrated improvement in all five.
  • Women in the hysterectomy group were treated using an abdominal surgical approach, with one patient experiencing postoperative wound infection that required secondary suture. Postoperative pathologic analysis found that 21 of these women (65.6%) had adenomyosis, six women (18.8%) had myomas, three women (9.4%) had both adenomyosis and a myoma, and two women (6.2%) had a normal uterus. Serum hemoglobin levels increased from a median of roughly 10.5 g/dL at the time of treatment to 13 g/dL at 6 months and slightly higher at 12 months. (There were no statistically significant differences in hemoglobin values between the LNG-IUS and hysterectomy groups at any point in the study.) Quality of life improved in three of the five domains assessed (physical and both environmental domains).

Although 11 women were lost to follow-up, this trial appeared to have an adequate sample size to examine the selected outcomes, and the population was well defined.

Two weaknesses were the limited follow-up (only 12 months) and the use of quality-of-life measures designed for a Turkish population (the trial was conducted in Turkey), which may or may not be fully applicable to a US population.

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
The relationship of adenomyosis to gynecologic symptoms, including heavy menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhea, needs further study. However, this trial confirmed that transvaginal ultrasound is helpful in the nonsurgical diagnosis of adenomyosis and suggests that the LNG-IUS may be as effective at 1 year as hysterectomy for the treatment of adenomyosis-associated heavy menstrual bleeding (AUB-A).
Clinicians who perform office-based ultrasound to assess AUB should familiarize themselves with the criteria for ultrasonic diagnosis of adenomyosis. These criteria include the presence of heterogeneous myometrial echogenicity, a loss of clarity of the endo-myometrial interface, typically radially oriented linear striations, the appearance of myometrial cysts, and an overall globular enlarged uterus characterized by asymmetric thickening of the myometrium.2
In patients with heavy menstrual bleeding who have these findings, particularly if there is coexistent dysmenorrhea and uterine tenderness, it behooves the clinician to consider the LNG-IUS as first-line therapy, especially for women who wish to preserve fertility, but also for women for whom fertility is not an issue.
There is some evidence that the therapeutic effect of the LNG-IUS containing 20 µg of levonorgestrel may start to fade at 2 or 3 years, a possibility that should be shared with patients.3 Other features, such as cavity size, thickness of the myometrium, and the coexistence of clinically relevant leiomyomas, have not been evaluated but may have an impact on the clinical response.

 

AUB-I: LOW-DOSE DOXYCYCLINE REDUCES THE TIME TO AMENORRHEA IN USERS OF CONTINUOUS ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES

Kaneshiro B, Edelman A, Carlson NE, Nichols M, Forbes MM, Jensen J. A randomized controlled trial of subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline to prevent unscheduled bleeding with continuous oral contraceptive pill use. Contraception. 2012;85(4):351–358.

Unscheduled bleeding is the most common complaint among women who use continuous combination oral contraceptives (OCs). Because unscheduled bleeding has been correlated with the upregulation of matrix metalloprotineases (MMPs), Kaneshiro and colleagues conducted a randomized, controlled trial of doxycycline (an MMP inhibitor) versus placebo among users of continuous OCs. The addition of doxycycline to the OC regimen did not significantly reduce unscheduled bleeding during the first 84 days of use, but it did shorten the time required to achieve amenorrhea (mean of 61.7 days for doxycycline vs 85.2 days for placebo; standard error [SE], 7.7 vs 6.7, respectively; P = .03).

Related Article: Big step forward and downward: An OC with 10 μg of estrogen  Robert L. Barbieri, MD (Editorial, May 2011)

Details and general findings of the trial
Participants (n = 65) were healthy women aged 18 to 45 years who had no contraindications to continuous use of combination OCs. Prior to enrollment, they all had used cyclic combination contraception (pill, patch, or ring) without unscheduled bleeding, thereby avoiding the “transition bleeding” that often occurs when continuous OCs are initiated.

 

 

All women in the trial were started on continuous OCs (20 µg ethinyl estradiol with 100 µg levonorgestrel; Aviane) and then randomly assigned to receive one of the following for 84 days in addition to the OC:

 

  • doxycycline 40 mg daily (controlled-release Oracea), a subantimicrobial dose
  • placebo.

After 84 days, doxycycline was discontinued, and participants were observed for an additional 28 days on the OC regimen alone for the documentation of bleeding patterns.

General findings:

 

  • The number of bleeding and spotting days decreased in both groups over the course of the study.
  • During the first 84 days of the trial, bleeding and spotting occurred among a median of 11 and 17 women in the doxycycline and placebo groups, respectively, and bleeding alone (without spotting) occurred in a median 3 and 4 women in the doxycycline and placebo groups, respectively.
  • During the 28-day observation period, bleeding and spotting occurred among a median of 0 and 6 women in the doxycycline and placebo groups, respectively. Bleeding alone (without spotting) was absent in both groups.
  • Women in the doxycycline group were significantly less likely to report side effects such as headache, depressed mood, and abdominal cramping. However, they were more likely to prefer continuous OCs without doxycycline, compared with women receiving placebo (16.1% vs 10.7%).

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
This trial increases our insight into AUB associated with the use of progestins and suggests that concomitant doxycycline may reduce unscheduled bleeding and spotting in women using continuous combination OCs. The trial was of adequate sample size for the primary outcomes, lending credence to its findings, although longer-term data would be helpful.
I have included this trial for two reasons:
It offers useful information regarding the mechanisms and potential prevention or reduction of AUB-I in users of continuous combined estrogen-progestin contraception.
Doxycycline is one of the agents covered in a Cochrane review of high-quality research into AUB-I in women using progestin-only products, including injectables, implantables, intrauterine systems, and oral agents.4 Estrogens have been shown to have some value in reducing breakthrough bleeding associated with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, and individual use of tranexamic acid or doxycycline has shown value in terminating an episode of breakthrough bleeding in women using progestin-only contraceptives.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK!
Share your thoughts on this article or on any topic relevant to ObGyns and women’s health practitioners. Tell us which topics you’d like to see covered in future issues, and what challenges you face in daily practice. We will consider publishing your letter and in a future issue.
Send your letter to: [email protected] Please include the city and state in which you practice.
Stay in touch! Your feedback is important to us!

As recently defined by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)—and endorsed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists—the term “abnormal uterine bleeding” (AUB) now describes any departure from normal menstrual bleeding.1 To determine the most appropriate intervention for this widespread problem, FIGO proposed that clinicians consider potential contributors to the clinical problem by investigating and categorizing patients according to the following system:

 

  • Polyp
  • Adenomyosis
  • Leiomyoma
  • Malignancy and hyperplasia
  • Coagulopathy
  • Ovulatory disorders
  • Endometrial dysfunction
  • Iatrogenic
  • Not otherwise classified.

A given individual may be found to have one or more of these features, but not all of the features may contribute to the AUB. To facilitate their use, these nine causes are more commonly identified using the acronym PALM-COEIN.

In this article, I focus on three of these categories, presenting recent data on AUB associated with leiomyomata (AUB-L) or adenomyosis (AUB-A), and AUB of an iatrogenic nature (AUB-I).

AUB-L: SATISFACTION RATES ARE SIMILAR 5 YEARS AFTER FIBROID TREATMENT BY SURGERY OR UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION

Gupta JK, Sinha A, Lumsden MA, Hickey M. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:CD005073. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005073.pub3.

Women who undergo uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids are just as satisfied with the outcome as women treated with hysterectomy or myomectomy, according to this 2012 review from the Cochrane Database.

Gupta and colleagues found similar patient-satisfaction rates at 5 years (odds ratio [OR] 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45–1.8), although women undergoing UAE were more likely to require additional interventions within 2 years (56 additional interventions per 1,000 women for surgery vs 250 per 1,000 women for UAE; OR, 5.64).

Details and general findings
Gupta and colleagues selected randomized, controlled trials comparing UAE with surgery:

 

  • three trials of UAE versus abdominal hysterectomy (n = 291)
  • one trial of UAE versus hysterectomy or myomectomy (the specific surgery was determined by patient preference) (n = 157)
  • one trial of UAE versus myomectomy in women desiring future childbearing (n = 121).

In these trials, UAE was bilateral and involved the use of permanent embolic material.

Among the findings:

 

  • Costs were lower with UAE, as assessed by measuring the duration of the procedure, length of hospitalization, and time to resumption of normal activities.
  • Ovarian-failure rates were comparable between women in the UAE and surgery groups. Ovarian function was assessed by measuring follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), although FSH thresholds varied in some of the studies.
  • Pregnancy was less likely after UAE than after myomectomy. In the trial comparing UAE with myomectomy, 26 women later tried to conceive after UAE versus 40 after myomectomy. Significantly fewer women became pregnant after UAE (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10–0.85).

Related Article: Update on Fertility  G. David Adamson, MD; Mary E. Abusief, MD (February 2014)

Bleeding outcomes were not measured
Strengths of this systematic review are its inclusion of high-quality, randomized, controlled trials and its assessment of ovarian-failure rates. However, a major weakness is the fact that its design does not allow for discrete evaluation of bleeding outcomes. Nor can its findings be broken down by the type of leiomyoma being treated.

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
This review demonstrates that women are satisfied with outcomes five years after UAE and that ovarian failure is not more common after UAE than after surgery. Although the available evidence demonstrates that pregnancy following UAE is possible, women requiring a surgical procedure for AUB-L who are uncertain about their childbearing plans or who are hoping to conceive should be encouraged to select myomectomy as their intervention of choice.

 

AUB-A: FOR ADENOMYOSIS-ASSOCIATED AUB, CONSIDER THE LNG-IUS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO HYSTERECTOMY

Ozdegirmenci O, Kayikcioglu F, Akgul MA, et al. Comparison of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysterectomy on efficacy and quality of life in patients with adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):497–502.

In a small randomized, controlled trial of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; Mirena) versus hysterectomy for adenomyosis-associated AUB, women allocated to the LNG-IUS experienced a reduction in bleeding and comparable gains in hemoglobin values during the first year of use. Both the LNG-IUS and hysterectomy improved health-related quality of life, but the LNG-IUS was associated with superior improvements in measures of psychological and social functioning.

Related Article: Update: Minimally invasive gynecology  Amy Garcia, MD (April 2013)

Details and general findings of the trial
Eighty-six women were enrolled in the trial after exclusion of endometrial pathology as a cause of their heavy menstrual bleeding and after transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings were consistent with the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Participants then were randomly assigned to undergo hysterectomy or insertion of an LNG-IUS (43 women in each group). At baseline, the mean (SD) age was 44.28 (4.36) years among women in the LNG-IUS group versus 46.38 (3.76) years among women undergoing hysterectomy (P = .032), a statistical difference that I suspect is not clinically significant.

 

 

Menstrual bleeding, hemoglobin levels, and quality of life were assessed prior to insertion or surgery, and again at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Eleven women in the hysterectomy group were lost to follow-up.

General findings of the trial include:

 

  • Women in the LNG-IUS group had a mean reduction in the volume of menstrual bleeding—as measured by the number of pads used—from two pads to one pad at 6 months, remaining at that level until 12 months. Serum hemoglobin levels increased from a median of just over
    11 g/dL at the time of insertion to 13 g/dL at 6 months and slightly higher at 12 months. In the five self-reported quality-of-life domains assessed (physical, psychological, social, environmental, and a national environmental domain), women using the LNG-IUS demonstrated improvement in all five.
  • Women in the hysterectomy group were treated using an abdominal surgical approach, with one patient experiencing postoperative wound infection that required secondary suture. Postoperative pathologic analysis found that 21 of these women (65.6%) had adenomyosis, six women (18.8%) had myomas, three women (9.4%) had both adenomyosis and a myoma, and two women (6.2%) had a normal uterus. Serum hemoglobin levels increased from a median of roughly 10.5 g/dL at the time of treatment to 13 g/dL at 6 months and slightly higher at 12 months. (There were no statistically significant differences in hemoglobin values between the LNG-IUS and hysterectomy groups at any point in the study.) Quality of life improved in three of the five domains assessed (physical and both environmental domains).

Although 11 women were lost to follow-up, this trial appeared to have an adequate sample size to examine the selected outcomes, and the population was well defined.

Two weaknesses were the limited follow-up (only 12 months) and the use of quality-of-life measures designed for a Turkish population (the trial was conducted in Turkey), which may or may not be fully applicable to a US population.

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
The relationship of adenomyosis to gynecologic symptoms, including heavy menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhea, needs further study. However, this trial confirmed that transvaginal ultrasound is helpful in the nonsurgical diagnosis of adenomyosis and suggests that the LNG-IUS may be as effective at 1 year as hysterectomy for the treatment of adenomyosis-associated heavy menstrual bleeding (AUB-A).
Clinicians who perform office-based ultrasound to assess AUB should familiarize themselves with the criteria for ultrasonic diagnosis of adenomyosis. These criteria include the presence of heterogeneous myometrial echogenicity, a loss of clarity of the endo-myometrial interface, typically radially oriented linear striations, the appearance of myometrial cysts, and an overall globular enlarged uterus characterized by asymmetric thickening of the myometrium.2
In patients with heavy menstrual bleeding who have these findings, particularly if there is coexistent dysmenorrhea and uterine tenderness, it behooves the clinician to consider the LNG-IUS as first-line therapy, especially for women who wish to preserve fertility, but also for women for whom fertility is not an issue.
There is some evidence that the therapeutic effect of the LNG-IUS containing 20 µg of levonorgestrel may start to fade at 2 or 3 years, a possibility that should be shared with patients.3 Other features, such as cavity size, thickness of the myometrium, and the coexistence of clinically relevant leiomyomas, have not been evaluated but may have an impact on the clinical response.

 

AUB-I: LOW-DOSE DOXYCYCLINE REDUCES THE TIME TO AMENORRHEA IN USERS OF CONTINUOUS ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES

Kaneshiro B, Edelman A, Carlson NE, Nichols M, Forbes MM, Jensen J. A randomized controlled trial of subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline to prevent unscheduled bleeding with continuous oral contraceptive pill use. Contraception. 2012;85(4):351–358.

Unscheduled bleeding is the most common complaint among women who use continuous combination oral contraceptives (OCs). Because unscheduled bleeding has been correlated with the upregulation of matrix metalloprotineases (MMPs), Kaneshiro and colleagues conducted a randomized, controlled trial of doxycycline (an MMP inhibitor) versus placebo among users of continuous OCs. The addition of doxycycline to the OC regimen did not significantly reduce unscheduled bleeding during the first 84 days of use, but it did shorten the time required to achieve amenorrhea (mean of 61.7 days for doxycycline vs 85.2 days for placebo; standard error [SE], 7.7 vs 6.7, respectively; P = .03).

Related Article: Big step forward and downward: An OC with 10 μg of estrogen  Robert L. Barbieri, MD (Editorial, May 2011)

Details and general findings of the trial
Participants (n = 65) were healthy women aged 18 to 45 years who had no contraindications to continuous use of combination OCs. Prior to enrollment, they all had used cyclic combination contraception (pill, patch, or ring) without unscheduled bleeding, thereby avoiding the “transition bleeding” that often occurs when continuous OCs are initiated.

 

 

All women in the trial were started on continuous OCs (20 µg ethinyl estradiol with 100 µg levonorgestrel; Aviane) and then randomly assigned to receive one of the following for 84 days in addition to the OC:

 

  • doxycycline 40 mg daily (controlled-release Oracea), a subantimicrobial dose
  • placebo.

After 84 days, doxycycline was discontinued, and participants were observed for an additional 28 days on the OC regimen alone for the documentation of bleeding patterns.

General findings:

 

  • The number of bleeding and spotting days decreased in both groups over the course of the study.
  • During the first 84 days of the trial, bleeding and spotting occurred among a median of 11 and 17 women in the doxycycline and placebo groups, respectively, and bleeding alone (without spotting) occurred in a median 3 and 4 women in the doxycycline and placebo groups, respectively.
  • During the 28-day observation period, bleeding and spotting occurred among a median of 0 and 6 women in the doxycycline and placebo groups, respectively. Bleeding alone (without spotting) was absent in both groups.
  • Women in the doxycycline group were significantly less likely to report side effects such as headache, depressed mood, and abdominal cramping. However, they were more likely to prefer continuous OCs without doxycycline, compared with women receiving placebo (16.1% vs 10.7%).

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
This trial increases our insight into AUB associated with the use of progestins and suggests that concomitant doxycycline may reduce unscheduled bleeding and spotting in women using continuous combination OCs. The trial was of adequate sample size for the primary outcomes, lending credence to its findings, although longer-term data would be helpful.
I have included this trial for two reasons:
It offers useful information regarding the mechanisms and potential prevention or reduction of AUB-I in users of continuous combined estrogen-progestin contraception.
Doxycycline is one of the agents covered in a Cochrane review of high-quality research into AUB-I in women using progestin-only products, including injectables, implantables, intrauterine systems, and oral agents.4 Estrogens have been shown to have some value in reducing breakthrough bleeding associated with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, and individual use of tranexamic acid or doxycycline has shown value in terminating an episode of breakthrough bleeding in women using progestin-only contraceptives.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK!
Share your thoughts on this article or on any topic relevant to ObGyns and women’s health practitioners. Tell us which topics you’d like to see covered in future issues, and what challenges you face in daily practice. We will consider publishing your letter and in a future issue.
Send your letter to: [email protected] Please include the city and state in which you practice.
Stay in touch! Your feedback is important to us!

References

 

 

  1. Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, Fraser IS; FIGO Working Group on Menstrual Disorders. The FIGO classification for causes of abnormal bleeding in the reproductive years. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2204–2208.
  2. Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, Balogun M, Khan KS. Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: Systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(11):1374–1384.
  3. Cho S, Nam A, Kim H, et al. Clinical effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in patients with adenomyosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(4):373.e1–e7.
  4. Abdel-Aleem H, d’Arcangues C, Vogelsong KM, Gaffield ML, Gulmezoglu AM. Treatment of vaginal bleeding irregularities induced by progestin-only contraceptives. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;10:CD003449. 
References

 

 

  1. Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, Fraser IS; FIGO Working Group on Menstrual Disorders. The FIGO classification for causes of abnormal bleeding in the reproductive years. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2204–2208.
  2. Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, Balogun M, Khan KS. Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: Systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(11):1374–1384.
  3. Cho S, Nam A, Kim H, et al. Clinical effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in patients with adenomyosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(4):373.e1–e7.
  4. Abdel-Aleem H, d’Arcangues C, Vogelsong KM, Gaffield ML, Gulmezoglu AM. Treatment of vaginal bleeding irregularities induced by progestin-only contraceptives. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;10:CD003449. 
Issue
OBG Management - 26(3)
Issue
OBG Management - 26(3)
Page Number
27-32
Page Number
27-32
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
2014 Update on abnormal uterine bleeding
Display Headline
2014 Update on abnormal uterine bleeding
Legacy Keywords
Malcolm G. Munro,abnormal uterine bleeding,AUB,fibroids, adenomyosis,progestins,International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics,FIGO,Polyp,adenomyosis,Leiomyoma,Malignancy and hyperplasia,Coagulopathy,Ovulatory disorders,Endometrial dysfunction,Iatrogenic,Not otherwise classified,PALM-COEIN,AUB-L,AUB-A,AUB-I,uterine artery embolization,UAE,hysterectomy,myomectomy,abdominal hysterectomy,ovarian-failure rates,pregnancy,LNG-IUS,levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system,Mirena,heavy menstrual bleeding,dysmenorrhea,oral contraceptive,OC,matrix metalloprotineases,MMPs,doxycycline,
Legacy Keywords
Malcolm G. Munro,abnormal uterine bleeding,AUB,fibroids, adenomyosis,progestins,International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics,FIGO,Polyp,adenomyosis,Leiomyoma,Malignancy and hyperplasia,Coagulopathy,Ovulatory disorders,Endometrial dysfunction,Iatrogenic,Not otherwise classified,PALM-COEIN,AUB-L,AUB-A,AUB-I,uterine artery embolization,UAE,hysterectomy,myomectomy,abdominal hysterectomy,ovarian-failure rates,pregnancy,LNG-IUS,levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system,Mirena,heavy menstrual bleeding,dysmenorrhea,oral contraceptive,OC,matrix metalloprotineases,MMPs,doxycycline,
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Article PDF Media

Targeting pathways can override resistance in ALL

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 02/25/2014 - 06:00
Display Headline
Targeting pathways can override resistance in ALL

ALL in the bone marrow

Inhibiting two biosynthesis pathways can override treatment resistance in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), preclinical research suggests.

Researchers found that inhibiting only one pathway did not effectively kill ALL cells. The cells simply used another pathway to replicate their DNA and continue dividing.

But inhibiting both pathways induced apoptosis in human leukemia cells and reduced tumor burden in mouse models of T- and B-cell ALL.

“This new, dual-targeting approach shows that we can overcome the redundancy in DNA synthesis in ALL cells and identifies a potential target for metabolic intervention in ALL, and possibly in other hematological cancers,” said study author Caius Radu, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles.

He and his colleagues described this approach in The Journal of Experimental Medicine.

The research began with the knowledge that deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, including deoxycytidine triphosphate (dCTP), are required for DNA replication, which is necessary for cell division. And dCTP can be produced by the de novo pathway or the nucleoside salvage pathway.

Dr Radu and his colleagues discovered that inhibiting the de novo pathway with the compound thymidine caused leukemia cells to switch to the nucleoside salvage pathway for dCTP production.

However, inhibiting both the de novo and nucleoside salvage pathways prevented dCTP production and proved lethal for leukemia cells.

A number of experiments elicited these results. In one, the researchers knocked down the deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) in human T-ALL cells to inhibit the nucleoside salvage pathway. Then, they administered thymidine to inhibit the de novo pathway. This resulted in dCTP depletion, stalled DNA replication, replication stress, DNA damage, and apoptosis.

The researchers also used the small-molecule inhibitor DI-39 to target dCK. They found that co-administration of DI-39 and thymidine induced replication stress and apoptosis in several leukemia cell lines: CEM, Jurkat, MOLT-4, NALM-6 and RS4;116.

The team then tested DI-39 and thymidine in mice bearing CEM tumors. They found the combination reduced tumor growth in mice bearing established, subcutaneous CEM xenografts and in mice with systemic T-ALL.

In the systemic T-ALL model, treatment with thymidine alone resulted in a 7-fold reduction in tumor burden compared to vehicle control or DI-39 alone. But when thymidine and DI-39 were administered together, mice saw a 100-fold reduction in tumor burden compared to thymidine alone.

The thymidine-DI-39 combination also proved effective against B-ALL cells and in a mouse model of B-ALL. However, the effects were not as great as those observed in T-ALL.

Finally, the researchers evaluated the effects of thymidine and DI-39 in hematopoietic progenitor cells. They looked at the Lineage- Sca-1+ c-Kit+ hematopoietic stem cell population, as well as short-term, long-term, and multipotent progenitor hematopoietic progenitor cells.

There was a minor decrease in the percentage of Lineage- Sca-1+ c-Kit+ cells after thymidine treatment. However, there were no other significant changes in progenitor cells between the treatment and control groups. Why leukemic cells and normal hematopoietic progenitors respond so differently to this treatment requires further investigation, the researchers said.

But they also noted that this study advances our understanding of DNA synthesis in leukemic cells and suggests that targeted metabolic intervention could be a new therapeutic approach in ALL.

Publications
Topics

ALL in the bone marrow

Inhibiting two biosynthesis pathways can override treatment resistance in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), preclinical research suggests.

Researchers found that inhibiting only one pathway did not effectively kill ALL cells. The cells simply used another pathway to replicate their DNA and continue dividing.

But inhibiting both pathways induced apoptosis in human leukemia cells and reduced tumor burden in mouse models of T- and B-cell ALL.

“This new, dual-targeting approach shows that we can overcome the redundancy in DNA synthesis in ALL cells and identifies a potential target for metabolic intervention in ALL, and possibly in other hematological cancers,” said study author Caius Radu, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles.

He and his colleagues described this approach in The Journal of Experimental Medicine.

The research began with the knowledge that deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, including deoxycytidine triphosphate (dCTP), are required for DNA replication, which is necessary for cell division. And dCTP can be produced by the de novo pathway or the nucleoside salvage pathway.

Dr Radu and his colleagues discovered that inhibiting the de novo pathway with the compound thymidine caused leukemia cells to switch to the nucleoside salvage pathway for dCTP production.

However, inhibiting both the de novo and nucleoside salvage pathways prevented dCTP production and proved lethal for leukemia cells.

A number of experiments elicited these results. In one, the researchers knocked down the deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) in human T-ALL cells to inhibit the nucleoside salvage pathway. Then, they administered thymidine to inhibit the de novo pathway. This resulted in dCTP depletion, stalled DNA replication, replication stress, DNA damage, and apoptosis.

The researchers also used the small-molecule inhibitor DI-39 to target dCK. They found that co-administration of DI-39 and thymidine induced replication stress and apoptosis in several leukemia cell lines: CEM, Jurkat, MOLT-4, NALM-6 and RS4;116.

The team then tested DI-39 and thymidine in mice bearing CEM tumors. They found the combination reduced tumor growth in mice bearing established, subcutaneous CEM xenografts and in mice with systemic T-ALL.

In the systemic T-ALL model, treatment with thymidine alone resulted in a 7-fold reduction in tumor burden compared to vehicle control or DI-39 alone. But when thymidine and DI-39 were administered together, mice saw a 100-fold reduction in tumor burden compared to thymidine alone.

The thymidine-DI-39 combination also proved effective against B-ALL cells and in a mouse model of B-ALL. However, the effects were not as great as those observed in T-ALL.

Finally, the researchers evaluated the effects of thymidine and DI-39 in hematopoietic progenitor cells. They looked at the Lineage- Sca-1+ c-Kit+ hematopoietic stem cell population, as well as short-term, long-term, and multipotent progenitor hematopoietic progenitor cells.

There was a minor decrease in the percentage of Lineage- Sca-1+ c-Kit+ cells after thymidine treatment. However, there were no other significant changes in progenitor cells between the treatment and control groups. Why leukemic cells and normal hematopoietic progenitors respond so differently to this treatment requires further investigation, the researchers said.

But they also noted that this study advances our understanding of DNA synthesis in leukemic cells and suggests that targeted metabolic intervention could be a new therapeutic approach in ALL.

ALL in the bone marrow

Inhibiting two biosynthesis pathways can override treatment resistance in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), preclinical research suggests.

Researchers found that inhibiting only one pathway did not effectively kill ALL cells. The cells simply used another pathway to replicate their DNA and continue dividing.

But inhibiting both pathways induced apoptosis in human leukemia cells and reduced tumor burden in mouse models of T- and B-cell ALL.

“This new, dual-targeting approach shows that we can overcome the redundancy in DNA synthesis in ALL cells and identifies a potential target for metabolic intervention in ALL, and possibly in other hematological cancers,” said study author Caius Radu, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles.

He and his colleagues described this approach in The Journal of Experimental Medicine.

The research began with the knowledge that deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, including deoxycytidine triphosphate (dCTP), are required for DNA replication, which is necessary for cell division. And dCTP can be produced by the de novo pathway or the nucleoside salvage pathway.

Dr Radu and his colleagues discovered that inhibiting the de novo pathway with the compound thymidine caused leukemia cells to switch to the nucleoside salvage pathway for dCTP production.

However, inhibiting both the de novo and nucleoside salvage pathways prevented dCTP production and proved lethal for leukemia cells.

A number of experiments elicited these results. In one, the researchers knocked down the deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) in human T-ALL cells to inhibit the nucleoside salvage pathway. Then, they administered thymidine to inhibit the de novo pathway. This resulted in dCTP depletion, stalled DNA replication, replication stress, DNA damage, and apoptosis.

The researchers also used the small-molecule inhibitor DI-39 to target dCK. They found that co-administration of DI-39 and thymidine induced replication stress and apoptosis in several leukemia cell lines: CEM, Jurkat, MOLT-4, NALM-6 and RS4;116.

The team then tested DI-39 and thymidine in mice bearing CEM tumors. They found the combination reduced tumor growth in mice bearing established, subcutaneous CEM xenografts and in mice with systemic T-ALL.

In the systemic T-ALL model, treatment with thymidine alone resulted in a 7-fold reduction in tumor burden compared to vehicle control or DI-39 alone. But when thymidine and DI-39 were administered together, mice saw a 100-fold reduction in tumor burden compared to thymidine alone.

The thymidine-DI-39 combination also proved effective against B-ALL cells and in a mouse model of B-ALL. However, the effects were not as great as those observed in T-ALL.

Finally, the researchers evaluated the effects of thymidine and DI-39 in hematopoietic progenitor cells. They looked at the Lineage- Sca-1+ c-Kit+ hematopoietic stem cell population, as well as short-term, long-term, and multipotent progenitor hematopoietic progenitor cells.

There was a minor decrease in the percentage of Lineage- Sca-1+ c-Kit+ cells after thymidine treatment. However, there were no other significant changes in progenitor cells between the treatment and control groups. Why leukemic cells and normal hematopoietic progenitors respond so differently to this treatment requires further investigation, the researchers said.

But they also noted that this study advances our understanding of DNA synthesis in leukemic cells and suggests that targeted metabolic intervention could be a new therapeutic approach in ALL.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Targeting pathways can override resistance in ALL
Display Headline
Targeting pathways can override resistance in ALL
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Malaria parasite originated in Africa, team says

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 02/25/2014 - 06:00
Display Headline
Malaria parasite originated in Africa, team says

Adult chimpanzee
David Morgan & Crickette Sanz

Investigators have found evidence suggesting the malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax originated in Africa.

Until recently, the closest genetic relatives of human P vivax were found only in Asian macaques, leading researchers to believe that P vivax originated in Asia.

The current study, published in Nature Communications, showed that wild apes in central Africa are widely infected with parasites that are, genetically, nearly identical to human P vivax.

This finding overturns the dogma that P vivax originated in Asia, despite being most prevalent in humans there now, and also solves other questions about P vivax infection.

For example, it explains why the Duffy-null phenotype, which confers resistance to P vivax, is common among people indigenous to Africa. And it explains how travelers returning from regions where most people are Duffy-negative can be infected with P vivax.

Paul Sharp, PhD, of the University of Edinburgh in the UK, and his colleagues conducted this research, testing more than 5000 ape fecal samples from dozens of field stations and sanctuaries in Africa for P vivax DNA.

They found P vivax-like sequences in chimpanzees, western gorillas, and eastern gorillas, but not in bonobos. Ape P vivax was highly prevalent in wild communities, exhibiting infection rates consistent with stable transmission of the parasite within the wild apes.

To examine the evolutionary relationships between ape and human parasites, the researchers generated parasite DNA sequences from wild and sanctuary apes, as well as from a global sampling of human P vivax infections.

They constructed a family tree of the sequences and found that ape and human parasites were very closely related. But ape parasites were more diverse than the human parasites and did not group according to their host species. The human parasites formed a single lineage that fell within the branches of ape parasite sequences.

From these evolutionary relationships, the investigators concluded that P vivax is of African—not Asian—origin and that all existing human P vivax parasites evolved from a single ancestor that spread out of Africa.

The high prevalence of P vivax in wild apes, along with the recent finding of ape P vivax in a European traveler, indicates the existence of a substantial natural reservoir of P vivax in Africa.

Resolving the Duffy-negative paradox

Of the 5 Plasmodium species known to cause malaria in humans, P vivax is the most widespread. Although highly prevalent in Asia and Latin America, P vivax was thought to be absent from west and central Africa due to a mutation that causes the Duffy-negative phenotype in most indigenous African people.

P vivax parasites enter human red blood cells via the Duffy protein receptor. Because the absence of the receptor on the surface of these cells confers protection against P vivax malaria, this parasite has long been suspected to be the agent that selected for this mutation. However, this hypothesis had been difficult to reconcile with the belief that P vivax originated in Asia.

“Our finding that wild-living apes in central Africa show widespread infection with diverse strains of P vivax provides new insight into the evolutionary history of human P vivax and resolves the paradox that a mutation conferring resistance to P vivax occurs with high frequency in the very region where this parasite is absent in humans,” said study author Beatrice Hahn, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

“One interpretation of the relationships that we observed is that a single host switch from apes gave rise to human P vivax, analogous to the origin of human P falciparum,” Dr Sharp added. “However, this seems unlikely in this case, since ape P vivax does not divide into gorilla- and chimpanzee-specific lineages.”

A more plausible scenario, according to the researchers, is that an ancestral P vivax stock was able to infect humans, gorillas, and chimpanzees in Africa until the Duffy-negative mutation started to spread—around 30,000 years ago—and eliminated P vivax from humans there.

Under this scenario, existing human-infecting P vivax is a parasite that survived after spreading out of Africa.

“The existence of a P vivax reservoir within the forests of central Africa has public health implications,” said study author Martine Peeters, PhD, of the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement and the University of Montpellier in France.

“First, it solves the mystery of P vivax infections in travelers returning from regions where 99% of the human population is Duffy-negative. It also raises the possibility that Duffy-positive humans whose work may bring them in close proximity to chimpanzees and gorillas may become infected by ape P vivax. This has already happened once and may happen again, with unknown consequences.”

The investigators are also concerned about the possibility that ape P vivax may spread via international travel to countries where human P vivax is actively transmitted. Since ape P vivax is more genetically diverse than human P vivax, it may have more versatility to escape treatment and prevention measures, especially if human and ape parasites were able to recombine.

Given what biologists know about P vivax’s ability to switch hosts, the researchers suggest it is important to screen Duffy-positive and Duffy-negative humans in west central Africa, as well as transmitting mosquito vectors, for the presence of ape P vivax. The team believes this information is necessary to inform malaria control and eradication efforts of the propensity of ape P vivax to cross over to humans.

The investigators are also planning to compare and contrast the molecular and biological properties of human and ape parasites to identify host-specific interactions and transmission requirements, thereby uncovering vulnerabilities that can be exploited to combat human malaria.

Publications
Topics

Adult chimpanzee
David Morgan & Crickette Sanz

Investigators have found evidence suggesting the malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax originated in Africa.

Until recently, the closest genetic relatives of human P vivax were found only in Asian macaques, leading researchers to believe that P vivax originated in Asia.

The current study, published in Nature Communications, showed that wild apes in central Africa are widely infected with parasites that are, genetically, nearly identical to human P vivax.

This finding overturns the dogma that P vivax originated in Asia, despite being most prevalent in humans there now, and also solves other questions about P vivax infection.

For example, it explains why the Duffy-null phenotype, which confers resistance to P vivax, is common among people indigenous to Africa. And it explains how travelers returning from regions where most people are Duffy-negative can be infected with P vivax.

Paul Sharp, PhD, of the University of Edinburgh in the UK, and his colleagues conducted this research, testing more than 5000 ape fecal samples from dozens of field stations and sanctuaries in Africa for P vivax DNA.

They found P vivax-like sequences in chimpanzees, western gorillas, and eastern gorillas, but not in bonobos. Ape P vivax was highly prevalent in wild communities, exhibiting infection rates consistent with stable transmission of the parasite within the wild apes.

To examine the evolutionary relationships between ape and human parasites, the researchers generated parasite DNA sequences from wild and sanctuary apes, as well as from a global sampling of human P vivax infections.

They constructed a family tree of the sequences and found that ape and human parasites were very closely related. But ape parasites were more diverse than the human parasites and did not group according to their host species. The human parasites formed a single lineage that fell within the branches of ape parasite sequences.

From these evolutionary relationships, the investigators concluded that P vivax is of African—not Asian—origin and that all existing human P vivax parasites evolved from a single ancestor that spread out of Africa.

The high prevalence of P vivax in wild apes, along with the recent finding of ape P vivax in a European traveler, indicates the existence of a substantial natural reservoir of P vivax in Africa.

Resolving the Duffy-negative paradox

Of the 5 Plasmodium species known to cause malaria in humans, P vivax is the most widespread. Although highly prevalent in Asia and Latin America, P vivax was thought to be absent from west and central Africa due to a mutation that causes the Duffy-negative phenotype in most indigenous African people.

P vivax parasites enter human red blood cells via the Duffy protein receptor. Because the absence of the receptor on the surface of these cells confers protection against P vivax malaria, this parasite has long been suspected to be the agent that selected for this mutation. However, this hypothesis had been difficult to reconcile with the belief that P vivax originated in Asia.

“Our finding that wild-living apes in central Africa show widespread infection with diverse strains of P vivax provides new insight into the evolutionary history of human P vivax and resolves the paradox that a mutation conferring resistance to P vivax occurs with high frequency in the very region where this parasite is absent in humans,” said study author Beatrice Hahn, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

“One interpretation of the relationships that we observed is that a single host switch from apes gave rise to human P vivax, analogous to the origin of human P falciparum,” Dr Sharp added. “However, this seems unlikely in this case, since ape P vivax does not divide into gorilla- and chimpanzee-specific lineages.”

A more plausible scenario, according to the researchers, is that an ancestral P vivax stock was able to infect humans, gorillas, and chimpanzees in Africa until the Duffy-negative mutation started to spread—around 30,000 years ago—and eliminated P vivax from humans there.

Under this scenario, existing human-infecting P vivax is a parasite that survived after spreading out of Africa.

“The existence of a P vivax reservoir within the forests of central Africa has public health implications,” said study author Martine Peeters, PhD, of the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement and the University of Montpellier in France.

“First, it solves the mystery of P vivax infections in travelers returning from regions where 99% of the human population is Duffy-negative. It also raises the possibility that Duffy-positive humans whose work may bring them in close proximity to chimpanzees and gorillas may become infected by ape P vivax. This has already happened once and may happen again, with unknown consequences.”

The investigators are also concerned about the possibility that ape P vivax may spread via international travel to countries where human P vivax is actively transmitted. Since ape P vivax is more genetically diverse than human P vivax, it may have more versatility to escape treatment and prevention measures, especially if human and ape parasites were able to recombine.

Given what biologists know about P vivax’s ability to switch hosts, the researchers suggest it is important to screen Duffy-positive and Duffy-negative humans in west central Africa, as well as transmitting mosquito vectors, for the presence of ape P vivax. The team believes this information is necessary to inform malaria control and eradication efforts of the propensity of ape P vivax to cross over to humans.

The investigators are also planning to compare and contrast the molecular and biological properties of human and ape parasites to identify host-specific interactions and transmission requirements, thereby uncovering vulnerabilities that can be exploited to combat human malaria.

Adult chimpanzee
David Morgan & Crickette Sanz

Investigators have found evidence suggesting the malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax originated in Africa.

Until recently, the closest genetic relatives of human P vivax were found only in Asian macaques, leading researchers to believe that P vivax originated in Asia.

The current study, published in Nature Communications, showed that wild apes in central Africa are widely infected with parasites that are, genetically, nearly identical to human P vivax.

This finding overturns the dogma that P vivax originated in Asia, despite being most prevalent in humans there now, and also solves other questions about P vivax infection.

For example, it explains why the Duffy-null phenotype, which confers resistance to P vivax, is common among people indigenous to Africa. And it explains how travelers returning from regions where most people are Duffy-negative can be infected with P vivax.

Paul Sharp, PhD, of the University of Edinburgh in the UK, and his colleagues conducted this research, testing more than 5000 ape fecal samples from dozens of field stations and sanctuaries in Africa for P vivax DNA.

They found P vivax-like sequences in chimpanzees, western gorillas, and eastern gorillas, but not in bonobos. Ape P vivax was highly prevalent in wild communities, exhibiting infection rates consistent with stable transmission of the parasite within the wild apes.

To examine the evolutionary relationships between ape and human parasites, the researchers generated parasite DNA sequences from wild and sanctuary apes, as well as from a global sampling of human P vivax infections.

They constructed a family tree of the sequences and found that ape and human parasites were very closely related. But ape parasites were more diverse than the human parasites and did not group according to their host species. The human parasites formed a single lineage that fell within the branches of ape parasite sequences.

From these evolutionary relationships, the investigators concluded that P vivax is of African—not Asian—origin and that all existing human P vivax parasites evolved from a single ancestor that spread out of Africa.

The high prevalence of P vivax in wild apes, along with the recent finding of ape P vivax in a European traveler, indicates the existence of a substantial natural reservoir of P vivax in Africa.

Resolving the Duffy-negative paradox

Of the 5 Plasmodium species known to cause malaria in humans, P vivax is the most widespread. Although highly prevalent in Asia and Latin America, P vivax was thought to be absent from west and central Africa due to a mutation that causes the Duffy-negative phenotype in most indigenous African people.

P vivax parasites enter human red blood cells via the Duffy protein receptor. Because the absence of the receptor on the surface of these cells confers protection against P vivax malaria, this parasite has long been suspected to be the agent that selected for this mutation. However, this hypothesis had been difficult to reconcile with the belief that P vivax originated in Asia.

“Our finding that wild-living apes in central Africa show widespread infection with diverse strains of P vivax provides new insight into the evolutionary history of human P vivax and resolves the paradox that a mutation conferring resistance to P vivax occurs with high frequency in the very region where this parasite is absent in humans,” said study author Beatrice Hahn, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

“One interpretation of the relationships that we observed is that a single host switch from apes gave rise to human P vivax, analogous to the origin of human P falciparum,” Dr Sharp added. “However, this seems unlikely in this case, since ape P vivax does not divide into gorilla- and chimpanzee-specific lineages.”

A more plausible scenario, according to the researchers, is that an ancestral P vivax stock was able to infect humans, gorillas, and chimpanzees in Africa until the Duffy-negative mutation started to spread—around 30,000 years ago—and eliminated P vivax from humans there.

Under this scenario, existing human-infecting P vivax is a parasite that survived after spreading out of Africa.

“The existence of a P vivax reservoir within the forests of central Africa has public health implications,” said study author Martine Peeters, PhD, of the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement and the University of Montpellier in France.

“First, it solves the mystery of P vivax infections in travelers returning from regions where 99% of the human population is Duffy-negative. It also raises the possibility that Duffy-positive humans whose work may bring them in close proximity to chimpanzees and gorillas may become infected by ape P vivax. This has already happened once and may happen again, with unknown consequences.”

The investigators are also concerned about the possibility that ape P vivax may spread via international travel to countries where human P vivax is actively transmitted. Since ape P vivax is more genetically diverse than human P vivax, it may have more versatility to escape treatment and prevention measures, especially if human and ape parasites were able to recombine.

Given what biologists know about P vivax’s ability to switch hosts, the researchers suggest it is important to screen Duffy-positive and Duffy-negative humans in west central Africa, as well as transmitting mosquito vectors, for the presence of ape P vivax. The team believes this information is necessary to inform malaria control and eradication efforts of the propensity of ape P vivax to cross over to humans.

The investigators are also planning to compare and contrast the molecular and biological properties of human and ape parasites to identify host-specific interactions and transmission requirements, thereby uncovering vulnerabilities that can be exploited to combat human malaria.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Malaria parasite originated in Africa, team says
Display Headline
Malaria parasite originated in Africa, team says
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Hospital to Home Transitions

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/02/2017 - 19:34
Display Headline
The successes and challenges of hospital to home transitions

Hospital readmissions, which account for a substantial proportion of healthcare expenditures, have increasingly become a focus for hospitals and health systems. Hospitals now assume greater responsibility for population health, and face financial penalties by federal and state agencies that consider readmissions a key measure of the quality of care provided during hospitalization. Consequently, there is broad interest in identifying approaches to reduce hospital reutilization, including emergency department (ED) revisits and hospital readmissions. In this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine, Auger et al.[1] report the results of a systematic review, which evaluates the effect of discharge interventions on hospital reutilization among children.

As Auger et al. note, the transition from hospital to home is a vulnerable time for children and their families, with 1 in 5 parents reporting major challenges with such transitions.[2] Auger and colleagues identified 14 studies spanning 3 pediatric disease processes that addressed this issue. The authors concluded that several interventions were potentially effective, but individual studies frequently used multifactorial interventions, precluding determination of discrete elements essential to success. The larger body of care transitions literature in adult populations provides insights for interventions that may benefit pediatric patients, as well as informs future research and quality improvement priorities.

The authors identified some distinct interventions that may successfully decrease hospital reutilization, which share common themes from the adult literature. The first is the use of a dedicated transition coordinator (eg, nurse) or coordinating center to assist with the patient's transition home after discharge. In adult studies, this bridging strategy[3, 4] (ie, use of a dedicated transition coordinator or provider) is initiated during the hospitalization and continues postdischarge in the form of phone calls or home visits. The second theme illustrated in both this pediatric review[1] and adult reviews[3, 4, 5] focuses on enhanced or individualized patient education. Most studies have used a combination of these strategies. For example, the Care Transitions Intervention (one of the best validated adult discharge approaches) uses a transition coach to aid the patient in medication self‐management, creation of a patient‐centered record, scheduling follow‐up appointments, and understanding signs and symptoms of a worsening condition.[6] In a randomized study, this intervention demonstrated a reduction in readmissions within 90 days to 16.7% in the intervention group, compared with 22.5% in the control group.[6] One of the pediatric studies highlighted in the review by Auger et al. achieved a decrease in 14‐day ED revisits from 8% prior to implementation of the program to 2.7% following implementation of the program.[7] This program was for patients discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit and involved a nurse coordinator (similar to a transition coach) who worked closely with families and ensured adequate resources prior to discharge as well as a home visitation program.[7]

Although Auger et al. identify some effective approaches to reducing hospital reutilization after discharge in children, their review and the complementary adult literature bring to light 4 main unresolved questions for hospitalists seeking to improve care transitions: (1) how to dissect diverse and heterogeneous interventions to determine the key driver of success, (2) how to interpret and generally apply interventions from single centers where they may have been tailored to a specific healthcare environment, (3) how to generalize the findings of many disease‐specific interventions to other populations, and (4) how to evaluate the cost and assess the costbenefit of implementing many of the more resource intensive interventions. An example of a heterogeneous intervention addressed in this pediatric systematic review was described by Ng et al.,[8] in which the intervention group received a combination of an enhanced discharge education session, disease‐specific nurse evaluation, an animated education booklet, and postdischarge telephone follow‐up, whereas the control group received a shorter discharge education session, a disease‐specific nurse evaluation only if referred by a physician, a written education booklet, and no telephone follow‐up. Investigators found that intervention patients were less likely to be readmitted or revisit the ED as compared with controls. A similarly multifaceted intervention introduced by Taggart et al.[9] was unable to detect a difference in readmissions or ED revisits. It is unclear whether or not the differences in outcomes were related to differences in the intervention bundle itself or institutional or local contextual factors, thus limiting application to other hospitals. Generalizability of interventions is similarly complicated in adults.

The studies presented in this pediatric review article are specific to 3 disease processes: cancer, asthma, and neonatal intensive care (ie, premature) populations. Beyond these populations, there were no other pediatric conditions that met inclusion criteria, thus limiting the generalizability of the findings. As described by Rennke et al.,[3] adult systematic reviews that have focused only on disease‐specific interventions to reduce hospital reutilization are also difficult to generalize to broader populations. Two of the 3 recent adult transition intervention systematic reviews excluded disease‐specific interventions in an attempt to find more broadly applicable interventions but struggled with the same heterogeneity discussed in this review by Auger et al.[3, 4] Although disease‐specific interventions were included in the third adult systematic review and the evaluation was restricted to randomized controlled trials, the authors still grappled with finding 1 or 2 common, successful intervention components.[5] The fourth unresolved question involves understanding the financial burden of implementing more resource‐intensive interventions such as postdischarge home nurse visits. For example, it may be difficult to justify the business case for hiring a transition coach or initiating home nurse visits when the cost and financial implications are unclear. Neither the pediatric nor adult literature describes this well.

Some of the challenges in identifying effective interventions differ between adult and pediatric populations. Adults tend to have multiple comorbid conditions, making them more medically complex and at greater risk for adverse outcomes, medication errors, and hospital utilization.[10] Although a small subset of the pediatric population with complex chronic medical conditions accounts for a majority of hospital reutilization and cost,[11] most hospitalized pediatric patients are otherwise healthy with acute illnesses.[12] Additionally, pediatric patients have lower overall hospital reutilization rates when compared with adults. Adult 30‐day readmission rates are approximately 20%[13] compared with pediatric patients whose mean 30‐day readmission rate is 6.5%.[14] With readmission being an outcome upon which studies are basing intervention success or failure, the relatively low readmission rates in the pediatric population make shifting that outcome more challenging.

There is also controversy about whether policymakers should be focusing on decreasing 30‐day readmission rates as a measure of success. We believe that efforts should focus on identifying more meaningful outcomes, especially outcomes important to patients and their families. No single metric is likely to be an adequate measure of the quality of care transitions, but a combination of outcome measures could potentially be more informative both for patients and clinicians. Patient satisfaction with the discharge process is measured as part of standard patient experience surveys, and the 3‐question Care Transitions Measure[15] has been validated and endorsed as a measure of patient perception of discharge safety in adult populations. There is a growing consensus that 30‐day readmission rates are lacking as a measure of discharge quality, and therefore, measuring shorter‐term7‐ or 14‐dayreadmission rates along with short‐term ED utilization after discharge would likely be more helpful for identifying care transitions problems. Attention should also be paid to measuring rates of specific adverse events in the postdischarge period, such as adverse drug events or failure to follow up on pending test results, as these failures are often implicated in reutilization.

In reflecting upon the published data on adult and pediatric transitions of care interventions and the lingering unanswered questions, we propose a few considerations for future direction of the field. First, engagement of the primary care provider may be beneficial. In many interventions describing a care transition coordinator, nursing fulfilled this role; however, there are opportunities for the primary care provider to play a greater role in this arena. Second, the use of factorial design in future studies may help elucidate which specific parts of each intervention may be the most crucial.[16] Finally, readmission rates are a controversial quality measure in adults. Pediatric readmissions are relatively uncommon, making it difficult to track measurements and show improvement. Clinicians, patients, and policymakers should prioritize outcome measures that are most meaningful to patients and their families that occur at a much higher rate than that of readmissions.

References
  1. Auger KA, Kenyon CC, Feudtner C, Davis MM. Pediatric hospital discharge interventions to reduce subsequent utilization: a systematic review. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(0):000000.
  2. Co JP, Ferris TG, Marino BL, Homer CJ, Perrin JM. Are hospital characteristics associated with parental views of pediatric inpatient care quality? Pediatrics. 2003;111(2):308314.
  3. Rennke S, Nguyen OK, Shoeb MH, Magan Y, Wachter RM, Ranji SR. Hospital‐initiated transitional care interventions as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 pt 2):433440.
  4. Hansen LO, Young RS, Hinami K, Leung A, Williams MV. Interventions to reduce 30‐day rehospitalization: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):520528.
  5. Hesselink G, Schoonhoven L, Barach P, et al. Improving patient handovers from hospital to primary care: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(6):417428.
  6. Coleman EA, Parry C, Chalmers S, Min SJ. The care transitions intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(17):18221828.
  7. Kotagal UR, Perlstein PH, Gamblian V, Donovan EF, Atherton HD. Description and evaluation of a program for the early discharge of infants from a neonatal intensive care unit. J Pediatr. 1995;127(2):285290.
  8. Ng DK, Chow PY, Lai WP, Chan KC, And BL, So HY. Effect of a structured asthma education program on hospitalized asthmatic children: a randomized controlled study. Pediatr Int. 2006;48(2):158162.
  9. Taggart VS, Zuckerman AE, Sly RM, et al. You Can Control Asthma: evaluation of an asthma education‐program for hospitalized inner‐city children. Patient Educ Couns. 1991;17(1):3547.
  10. Forster AJ, Clark HD, Menard A, et al. Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital. CMAJ. 2004;170(3):345349.
  11. Berry JG, Hall DE, Kuo DZ, et al. Hospital utilization and characteristics of patients experiencing recurrent readmissions within children's hospitals. JAMA. 2011;305(7):682690.
  12. Keren R, Luan X, Localio R, et al. Prioritization of comparative effectiveness research topics in hospital pediatrics. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(12):11551164.
  13. Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Thirty‐day readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care. JAMA. 2011;305(7):675681.
  14. Berry JG, Toomey SL, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Pediatric readmission prevalence and variability across hospitals. JAMA. 2013;309(4):372380.
  15. Parry C, Mahoney E, Chalmers SA, Coleman EA. Assessing the quality of transitional care: further applications of the care transitions measure. Med Care. 2008;46(3):317322.
  16. Moen RD, Nolan TW, Provost LP. Quality Improvement Through Planned Experimentation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw‐Hill; 1999.
Article PDF
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 9(4)
Page Number
271-273
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF

Hospital readmissions, which account for a substantial proportion of healthcare expenditures, have increasingly become a focus for hospitals and health systems. Hospitals now assume greater responsibility for population health, and face financial penalties by federal and state agencies that consider readmissions a key measure of the quality of care provided during hospitalization. Consequently, there is broad interest in identifying approaches to reduce hospital reutilization, including emergency department (ED) revisits and hospital readmissions. In this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine, Auger et al.[1] report the results of a systematic review, which evaluates the effect of discharge interventions on hospital reutilization among children.

As Auger et al. note, the transition from hospital to home is a vulnerable time for children and their families, with 1 in 5 parents reporting major challenges with such transitions.[2] Auger and colleagues identified 14 studies spanning 3 pediatric disease processes that addressed this issue. The authors concluded that several interventions were potentially effective, but individual studies frequently used multifactorial interventions, precluding determination of discrete elements essential to success. The larger body of care transitions literature in adult populations provides insights for interventions that may benefit pediatric patients, as well as informs future research and quality improvement priorities.

The authors identified some distinct interventions that may successfully decrease hospital reutilization, which share common themes from the adult literature. The first is the use of a dedicated transition coordinator (eg, nurse) or coordinating center to assist with the patient's transition home after discharge. In adult studies, this bridging strategy[3, 4] (ie, use of a dedicated transition coordinator or provider) is initiated during the hospitalization and continues postdischarge in the form of phone calls or home visits. The second theme illustrated in both this pediatric review[1] and adult reviews[3, 4, 5] focuses on enhanced or individualized patient education. Most studies have used a combination of these strategies. For example, the Care Transitions Intervention (one of the best validated adult discharge approaches) uses a transition coach to aid the patient in medication self‐management, creation of a patient‐centered record, scheduling follow‐up appointments, and understanding signs and symptoms of a worsening condition.[6] In a randomized study, this intervention demonstrated a reduction in readmissions within 90 days to 16.7% in the intervention group, compared with 22.5% in the control group.[6] One of the pediatric studies highlighted in the review by Auger et al. achieved a decrease in 14‐day ED revisits from 8% prior to implementation of the program to 2.7% following implementation of the program.[7] This program was for patients discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit and involved a nurse coordinator (similar to a transition coach) who worked closely with families and ensured adequate resources prior to discharge as well as a home visitation program.[7]

Although Auger et al. identify some effective approaches to reducing hospital reutilization after discharge in children, their review and the complementary adult literature bring to light 4 main unresolved questions for hospitalists seeking to improve care transitions: (1) how to dissect diverse and heterogeneous interventions to determine the key driver of success, (2) how to interpret and generally apply interventions from single centers where they may have been tailored to a specific healthcare environment, (3) how to generalize the findings of many disease‐specific interventions to other populations, and (4) how to evaluate the cost and assess the costbenefit of implementing many of the more resource intensive interventions. An example of a heterogeneous intervention addressed in this pediatric systematic review was described by Ng et al.,[8] in which the intervention group received a combination of an enhanced discharge education session, disease‐specific nurse evaluation, an animated education booklet, and postdischarge telephone follow‐up, whereas the control group received a shorter discharge education session, a disease‐specific nurse evaluation only if referred by a physician, a written education booklet, and no telephone follow‐up. Investigators found that intervention patients were less likely to be readmitted or revisit the ED as compared with controls. A similarly multifaceted intervention introduced by Taggart et al.[9] was unable to detect a difference in readmissions or ED revisits. It is unclear whether or not the differences in outcomes were related to differences in the intervention bundle itself or institutional or local contextual factors, thus limiting application to other hospitals. Generalizability of interventions is similarly complicated in adults.

The studies presented in this pediatric review article are specific to 3 disease processes: cancer, asthma, and neonatal intensive care (ie, premature) populations. Beyond these populations, there were no other pediatric conditions that met inclusion criteria, thus limiting the generalizability of the findings. As described by Rennke et al.,[3] adult systematic reviews that have focused only on disease‐specific interventions to reduce hospital reutilization are also difficult to generalize to broader populations. Two of the 3 recent adult transition intervention systematic reviews excluded disease‐specific interventions in an attempt to find more broadly applicable interventions but struggled with the same heterogeneity discussed in this review by Auger et al.[3, 4] Although disease‐specific interventions were included in the third adult systematic review and the evaluation was restricted to randomized controlled trials, the authors still grappled with finding 1 or 2 common, successful intervention components.[5] The fourth unresolved question involves understanding the financial burden of implementing more resource‐intensive interventions such as postdischarge home nurse visits. For example, it may be difficult to justify the business case for hiring a transition coach or initiating home nurse visits when the cost and financial implications are unclear. Neither the pediatric nor adult literature describes this well.

Some of the challenges in identifying effective interventions differ between adult and pediatric populations. Adults tend to have multiple comorbid conditions, making them more medically complex and at greater risk for adverse outcomes, medication errors, and hospital utilization.[10] Although a small subset of the pediatric population with complex chronic medical conditions accounts for a majority of hospital reutilization and cost,[11] most hospitalized pediatric patients are otherwise healthy with acute illnesses.[12] Additionally, pediatric patients have lower overall hospital reutilization rates when compared with adults. Adult 30‐day readmission rates are approximately 20%[13] compared with pediatric patients whose mean 30‐day readmission rate is 6.5%.[14] With readmission being an outcome upon which studies are basing intervention success or failure, the relatively low readmission rates in the pediatric population make shifting that outcome more challenging.

There is also controversy about whether policymakers should be focusing on decreasing 30‐day readmission rates as a measure of success. We believe that efforts should focus on identifying more meaningful outcomes, especially outcomes important to patients and their families. No single metric is likely to be an adequate measure of the quality of care transitions, but a combination of outcome measures could potentially be more informative both for patients and clinicians. Patient satisfaction with the discharge process is measured as part of standard patient experience surveys, and the 3‐question Care Transitions Measure[15] has been validated and endorsed as a measure of patient perception of discharge safety in adult populations. There is a growing consensus that 30‐day readmission rates are lacking as a measure of discharge quality, and therefore, measuring shorter‐term7‐ or 14‐dayreadmission rates along with short‐term ED utilization after discharge would likely be more helpful for identifying care transitions problems. Attention should also be paid to measuring rates of specific adverse events in the postdischarge period, such as adverse drug events or failure to follow up on pending test results, as these failures are often implicated in reutilization.

In reflecting upon the published data on adult and pediatric transitions of care interventions and the lingering unanswered questions, we propose a few considerations for future direction of the field. First, engagement of the primary care provider may be beneficial. In many interventions describing a care transition coordinator, nursing fulfilled this role; however, there are opportunities for the primary care provider to play a greater role in this arena. Second, the use of factorial design in future studies may help elucidate which specific parts of each intervention may be the most crucial.[16] Finally, readmission rates are a controversial quality measure in adults. Pediatric readmissions are relatively uncommon, making it difficult to track measurements and show improvement. Clinicians, patients, and policymakers should prioritize outcome measures that are most meaningful to patients and their families that occur at a much higher rate than that of readmissions.

Hospital readmissions, which account for a substantial proportion of healthcare expenditures, have increasingly become a focus for hospitals and health systems. Hospitals now assume greater responsibility for population health, and face financial penalties by federal and state agencies that consider readmissions a key measure of the quality of care provided during hospitalization. Consequently, there is broad interest in identifying approaches to reduce hospital reutilization, including emergency department (ED) revisits and hospital readmissions. In this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine, Auger et al.[1] report the results of a systematic review, which evaluates the effect of discharge interventions on hospital reutilization among children.

As Auger et al. note, the transition from hospital to home is a vulnerable time for children and their families, with 1 in 5 parents reporting major challenges with such transitions.[2] Auger and colleagues identified 14 studies spanning 3 pediatric disease processes that addressed this issue. The authors concluded that several interventions were potentially effective, but individual studies frequently used multifactorial interventions, precluding determination of discrete elements essential to success. The larger body of care transitions literature in adult populations provides insights for interventions that may benefit pediatric patients, as well as informs future research and quality improvement priorities.

The authors identified some distinct interventions that may successfully decrease hospital reutilization, which share common themes from the adult literature. The first is the use of a dedicated transition coordinator (eg, nurse) or coordinating center to assist with the patient's transition home after discharge. In adult studies, this bridging strategy[3, 4] (ie, use of a dedicated transition coordinator or provider) is initiated during the hospitalization and continues postdischarge in the form of phone calls or home visits. The second theme illustrated in both this pediatric review[1] and adult reviews[3, 4, 5] focuses on enhanced or individualized patient education. Most studies have used a combination of these strategies. For example, the Care Transitions Intervention (one of the best validated adult discharge approaches) uses a transition coach to aid the patient in medication self‐management, creation of a patient‐centered record, scheduling follow‐up appointments, and understanding signs and symptoms of a worsening condition.[6] In a randomized study, this intervention demonstrated a reduction in readmissions within 90 days to 16.7% in the intervention group, compared with 22.5% in the control group.[6] One of the pediatric studies highlighted in the review by Auger et al. achieved a decrease in 14‐day ED revisits from 8% prior to implementation of the program to 2.7% following implementation of the program.[7] This program was for patients discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit and involved a nurse coordinator (similar to a transition coach) who worked closely with families and ensured adequate resources prior to discharge as well as a home visitation program.[7]

Although Auger et al. identify some effective approaches to reducing hospital reutilization after discharge in children, their review and the complementary adult literature bring to light 4 main unresolved questions for hospitalists seeking to improve care transitions: (1) how to dissect diverse and heterogeneous interventions to determine the key driver of success, (2) how to interpret and generally apply interventions from single centers where they may have been tailored to a specific healthcare environment, (3) how to generalize the findings of many disease‐specific interventions to other populations, and (4) how to evaluate the cost and assess the costbenefit of implementing many of the more resource intensive interventions. An example of a heterogeneous intervention addressed in this pediatric systematic review was described by Ng et al.,[8] in which the intervention group received a combination of an enhanced discharge education session, disease‐specific nurse evaluation, an animated education booklet, and postdischarge telephone follow‐up, whereas the control group received a shorter discharge education session, a disease‐specific nurse evaluation only if referred by a physician, a written education booklet, and no telephone follow‐up. Investigators found that intervention patients were less likely to be readmitted or revisit the ED as compared with controls. A similarly multifaceted intervention introduced by Taggart et al.[9] was unable to detect a difference in readmissions or ED revisits. It is unclear whether or not the differences in outcomes were related to differences in the intervention bundle itself or institutional or local contextual factors, thus limiting application to other hospitals. Generalizability of interventions is similarly complicated in adults.

The studies presented in this pediatric review article are specific to 3 disease processes: cancer, asthma, and neonatal intensive care (ie, premature) populations. Beyond these populations, there were no other pediatric conditions that met inclusion criteria, thus limiting the generalizability of the findings. As described by Rennke et al.,[3] adult systematic reviews that have focused only on disease‐specific interventions to reduce hospital reutilization are also difficult to generalize to broader populations. Two of the 3 recent adult transition intervention systematic reviews excluded disease‐specific interventions in an attempt to find more broadly applicable interventions but struggled with the same heterogeneity discussed in this review by Auger et al.[3, 4] Although disease‐specific interventions were included in the third adult systematic review and the evaluation was restricted to randomized controlled trials, the authors still grappled with finding 1 or 2 common, successful intervention components.[5] The fourth unresolved question involves understanding the financial burden of implementing more resource‐intensive interventions such as postdischarge home nurse visits. For example, it may be difficult to justify the business case for hiring a transition coach or initiating home nurse visits when the cost and financial implications are unclear. Neither the pediatric nor adult literature describes this well.

Some of the challenges in identifying effective interventions differ between adult and pediatric populations. Adults tend to have multiple comorbid conditions, making them more medically complex and at greater risk for adverse outcomes, medication errors, and hospital utilization.[10] Although a small subset of the pediatric population with complex chronic medical conditions accounts for a majority of hospital reutilization and cost,[11] most hospitalized pediatric patients are otherwise healthy with acute illnesses.[12] Additionally, pediatric patients have lower overall hospital reutilization rates when compared with adults. Adult 30‐day readmission rates are approximately 20%[13] compared with pediatric patients whose mean 30‐day readmission rate is 6.5%.[14] With readmission being an outcome upon which studies are basing intervention success or failure, the relatively low readmission rates in the pediatric population make shifting that outcome more challenging.

There is also controversy about whether policymakers should be focusing on decreasing 30‐day readmission rates as a measure of success. We believe that efforts should focus on identifying more meaningful outcomes, especially outcomes important to patients and their families. No single metric is likely to be an adequate measure of the quality of care transitions, but a combination of outcome measures could potentially be more informative both for patients and clinicians. Patient satisfaction with the discharge process is measured as part of standard patient experience surveys, and the 3‐question Care Transitions Measure[15] has been validated and endorsed as a measure of patient perception of discharge safety in adult populations. There is a growing consensus that 30‐day readmission rates are lacking as a measure of discharge quality, and therefore, measuring shorter‐term7‐ or 14‐dayreadmission rates along with short‐term ED utilization after discharge would likely be more helpful for identifying care transitions problems. Attention should also be paid to measuring rates of specific adverse events in the postdischarge period, such as adverse drug events or failure to follow up on pending test results, as these failures are often implicated in reutilization.

In reflecting upon the published data on adult and pediatric transitions of care interventions and the lingering unanswered questions, we propose a few considerations for future direction of the field. First, engagement of the primary care provider may be beneficial. In many interventions describing a care transition coordinator, nursing fulfilled this role; however, there are opportunities for the primary care provider to play a greater role in this arena. Second, the use of factorial design in future studies may help elucidate which specific parts of each intervention may be the most crucial.[16] Finally, readmission rates are a controversial quality measure in adults. Pediatric readmissions are relatively uncommon, making it difficult to track measurements and show improvement. Clinicians, patients, and policymakers should prioritize outcome measures that are most meaningful to patients and their families that occur at a much higher rate than that of readmissions.

References
  1. Auger KA, Kenyon CC, Feudtner C, Davis MM. Pediatric hospital discharge interventions to reduce subsequent utilization: a systematic review. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(0):000000.
  2. Co JP, Ferris TG, Marino BL, Homer CJ, Perrin JM. Are hospital characteristics associated with parental views of pediatric inpatient care quality? Pediatrics. 2003;111(2):308314.
  3. Rennke S, Nguyen OK, Shoeb MH, Magan Y, Wachter RM, Ranji SR. Hospital‐initiated transitional care interventions as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 pt 2):433440.
  4. Hansen LO, Young RS, Hinami K, Leung A, Williams MV. Interventions to reduce 30‐day rehospitalization: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):520528.
  5. Hesselink G, Schoonhoven L, Barach P, et al. Improving patient handovers from hospital to primary care: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(6):417428.
  6. Coleman EA, Parry C, Chalmers S, Min SJ. The care transitions intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(17):18221828.
  7. Kotagal UR, Perlstein PH, Gamblian V, Donovan EF, Atherton HD. Description and evaluation of a program for the early discharge of infants from a neonatal intensive care unit. J Pediatr. 1995;127(2):285290.
  8. Ng DK, Chow PY, Lai WP, Chan KC, And BL, So HY. Effect of a structured asthma education program on hospitalized asthmatic children: a randomized controlled study. Pediatr Int. 2006;48(2):158162.
  9. Taggart VS, Zuckerman AE, Sly RM, et al. You Can Control Asthma: evaluation of an asthma education‐program for hospitalized inner‐city children. Patient Educ Couns. 1991;17(1):3547.
  10. Forster AJ, Clark HD, Menard A, et al. Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital. CMAJ. 2004;170(3):345349.
  11. Berry JG, Hall DE, Kuo DZ, et al. Hospital utilization and characteristics of patients experiencing recurrent readmissions within children's hospitals. JAMA. 2011;305(7):682690.
  12. Keren R, Luan X, Localio R, et al. Prioritization of comparative effectiveness research topics in hospital pediatrics. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(12):11551164.
  13. Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Thirty‐day readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care. JAMA. 2011;305(7):675681.
  14. Berry JG, Toomey SL, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Pediatric readmission prevalence and variability across hospitals. JAMA. 2013;309(4):372380.
  15. Parry C, Mahoney E, Chalmers SA, Coleman EA. Assessing the quality of transitional care: further applications of the care transitions measure. Med Care. 2008;46(3):317322.
  16. Moen RD, Nolan TW, Provost LP. Quality Improvement Through Planned Experimentation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw‐Hill; 1999.
References
  1. Auger KA, Kenyon CC, Feudtner C, Davis MM. Pediatric hospital discharge interventions to reduce subsequent utilization: a systematic review. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(0):000000.
  2. Co JP, Ferris TG, Marino BL, Homer CJ, Perrin JM. Are hospital characteristics associated with parental views of pediatric inpatient care quality? Pediatrics. 2003;111(2):308314.
  3. Rennke S, Nguyen OK, Shoeb MH, Magan Y, Wachter RM, Ranji SR. Hospital‐initiated transitional care interventions as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 pt 2):433440.
  4. Hansen LO, Young RS, Hinami K, Leung A, Williams MV. Interventions to reduce 30‐day rehospitalization: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):520528.
  5. Hesselink G, Schoonhoven L, Barach P, et al. Improving patient handovers from hospital to primary care: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(6):417428.
  6. Coleman EA, Parry C, Chalmers S, Min SJ. The care transitions intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(17):18221828.
  7. Kotagal UR, Perlstein PH, Gamblian V, Donovan EF, Atherton HD. Description and evaluation of a program for the early discharge of infants from a neonatal intensive care unit. J Pediatr. 1995;127(2):285290.
  8. Ng DK, Chow PY, Lai WP, Chan KC, And BL, So HY. Effect of a structured asthma education program on hospitalized asthmatic children: a randomized controlled study. Pediatr Int. 2006;48(2):158162.
  9. Taggart VS, Zuckerman AE, Sly RM, et al. You Can Control Asthma: evaluation of an asthma education‐program for hospitalized inner‐city children. Patient Educ Couns. 1991;17(1):3547.
  10. Forster AJ, Clark HD, Menard A, et al. Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital. CMAJ. 2004;170(3):345349.
  11. Berry JG, Hall DE, Kuo DZ, et al. Hospital utilization and characteristics of patients experiencing recurrent readmissions within children's hospitals. JAMA. 2011;305(7):682690.
  12. Keren R, Luan X, Localio R, et al. Prioritization of comparative effectiveness research topics in hospital pediatrics. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(12):11551164.
  13. Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Thirty‐day readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care. JAMA. 2011;305(7):675681.
  14. Berry JG, Toomey SL, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Pediatric readmission prevalence and variability across hospitals. JAMA. 2013;309(4):372380.
  15. Parry C, Mahoney E, Chalmers SA, Coleman EA. Assessing the quality of transitional care: further applications of the care transitions measure. Med Care. 2008;46(3):317322.
  16. Moen RD, Nolan TW, Provost LP. Quality Improvement Through Planned Experimentation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw‐Hill; 1999.
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 9(4)
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 9(4)
Page Number
271-273
Page Number
271-273
Article Type
Display Headline
The successes and challenges of hospital to home transitions
Display Headline
The successes and challenges of hospital to home transitions
Sections
Article Source
© 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine
Disallow All Ads
Correspondence Location
Address for correspondence and reprint requests: Samir S. Shah, MD, Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., MLC 9016, Cincinnati, OH 45229‐3039; Telephone: 513–636‐0409; E‐mail: [email protected]
Content Gating
Gated (full article locked unless allowed per User)
Gating Strategy
First Peek Free
Article PDF Media

AAN issues nonvalvular atrial fibrillation stroke prevention guideline

'Tepid guidelines' miss opportunity
Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 13:20
Display Headline
AAN issues nonvalvular atrial fibrillation stroke prevention guideline

A new evidence-based guideline on how to identify and treat patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation to prevent cardioembolic stroke from the American Academy of Neurology suggests when to conduct cardiac rhythm monitoring and offer anticoagulation, including newer agents in place of warfarin.

But the guideline might already be outdated in not considering the results of the recent CRYSTAL-AF study, in which long-term cardiac rhythm monitoring of patients with a previous cryptogenic stroke detected asymptomatic patients at a significantly higher rate than did standard monitoring methods.

Dr. Antonio Culebras

The guideline also extends the routine use of anticoagulation for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who are generally undertreated or whose health was thought a possible barrier to their use, such as those aged 75 years or older, those with mild dementia, and those at moderate risk of falls.

"Cognizant of the global reach of the AAN [American Academy of Neurology], the guideline also examines the evidence base for a treatment alternative to warfarin or its analogues for patients in developing countries who may not have access to the new oral anticoagulants," said lead author Dr. Antonio Culebras in an interview.

"The World Health Organization has determined that atrial fibrillation has reached near-epidemic proportions," observed Dr. Culebras of the State University of New York, Syracuse. "Approximately 1 in 20 individuals with AF will have a stroke unless treated appropriately."

The risk for stroke among patients with NVAF is highest in those with a history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or prior stroke, at an absolute value of around 10% per year. Patients with "lone NVAF," meaning they have no additional risk factors, have less than a 2% increased risk of stroke per year.

The AAN issued a practice parameter on this topic in 1998 (Neurology 1998;51:671-3). At the time, warfarin, adjusted to an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0, was, and largely remains, the recommended standard for patients at risk for cardioembolic stroke. Aspirin was the only recommended alterative for those unable to receive the vitamin K antagonist or who were deemed to be at low risk of stroke, although the evidence was scanty.

Since then, several new oral anticoagulant agents have become available, including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran (Pradaxa), and two factor Xa inhibitors – rivaroxaban (Xarelto) and apixaban (Eliquis) – which have been shown to be at least as effective as, if not more effective than, warfarin. Cardiac rhythm monitoring via a variety of methods has also been introduced as a means to try to detect NVAF in asymptomatic patients.

The aim of the AAN guideline (Neurology 2014;82:716-24) was therefore to look at the latest evidence on the detection of AF using new technologies, as well as the use of treatments to reduce the risk of stroke without increasing the risk of hemorrhage versus the long-standing standard of therapy, warfarin. Data published from 1998 to March 2013 were considered in the preparation of the guideline.

Cardiac rhythm monitoring for NVAF

Seventeen studies were found that examined the use of cardiac monitoring technologies to detect new cases of NVAF. The most common methods used were 24-hour Holter monitoring and serial electrocardiograms, but some emerging evidence on newer technologies was included. The proportion of patients identified with NVAF ranged from 0% to 23%, with the average detection rate 10.7% in all of the studies included.

"The guideline addresses the question of long-term monitoring of patients with NVAF," Dr. Culebras said. "It recommends that clinicians ‘might’ [level C evidence] obtain outpatient cardiac rhythm studies in patients with cryptogenic stroke without known NVAF to identify patients with occult NVAF." He added that the guideline also recommends that monitoring might be needed for prolonged periods of 1 or more weeks rather than for shorter periods, such as 24 hours.

However, at the time the guideline was being prepared, recent data from the CRYSTAL-AF study were not available, and this means the guideline is already outdated, Dr. Richard A. Bernstein, professor of neurology at Northwestern University, Chicago, said in an interview. He was not a guideline author.

Dr. Bernstein was on the steering committee for the CRYSTAL-AF trial, which assessed the performance of Medtronic’s Reveal XT Insertable Cardiac Monitor and found that the implanted device could detect NVAF better than serial ECGs or Holter monitoring (8.6% vs. 1.4%; P = .0006); most (74%) cases of NVAF found were asymptomatic.*

"CRYSTAL-AF represents the state of the art for cardiac monitoring in cryptogenic stroke patients and makes the AAN guidelines obsolete," Dr. Berstein said. "[The study] shows that even intermediate-term monitoring (less than 1 month) will miss the majority of AF in this population, and that most of the AF we find with long-term (greater than 1 year) monitoring is likely to be clinically significant."

 

 

With regard to the AAN guideline, he added: "There is no discussion of truly long-term monitoring in the guideline, which is unfortunate." That said, "anything that gets neurologists thinking about long-term cardiac monitoring is likely to be beneficial."

Anticoagulation for stroke prevention

The AAN guideline also provides general recommendations on the use of novel oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) as alternatives to warfarin. Specifically, it notes that in comparison with warfarin, these NOACs are probably at least as effective (rivaroxaban) or more effective (dabigatran and apixaban). Additionally, while apixaban is also likely to be more effective than aspirin, it is associated with a similar risk for bleeding. NOACs have the following advantages over warfarin: an overall lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage and no need for routine anticoagulant monitoring.

From a practical perspective, the AAN guideline suggests that clinicians have the following options available: warfarin to reach an INR of 2.0-3.0, dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, rivaroxaban 15-20 mg/dL, apixaban 2.5-5 mg twice a day, and triflusal 600 mg plus acenocoumarol to reach an INR target of 1.25-2.0. If a patient is already taking warfarin and is well controlled, then they should remain on that therapy and not switch to a newer oral anticoagulant.

The guideline also notes that clopidogrel plus aspirin is probably less effective than warfarin, but the combination is probably better than aspirin alone. However, the risk of hemorrhage is higher.

Where used, triflusal plus acenocoumarol is "likely more effective" than acenocoumarol alone. Triflusal is an antiplatelet drug related to aspirin, used in Europe, Latin America, and Southeast Asia. Acenocoumarol is mostly used in European countries.

Dr. Culebras explained that the guideline was not intended to dictate which treatment to use. "The guideline leaves room on purpose for clinicians to use their judgment," he said. "The overall objective of the guideline is to reduce therapeutic uncertainty and not to issue commandments for treatment."

Although Dr. Bernstein was critical of the guidelines for not advocating the use of anticoagulants strongly enough, he said that the recommendations on anticoagulant choice are "reasonable in that they impute potential clinical profiles of patients who might particularly benefit from one NOAC over another, without making a claim that these recommendations are based on solid data. This reflects how doctors make decisions when we don’t have direct comparative studies, and I think that is helpful."

The guideline was developed with financial support from the American Academy of Neurology. None of the authors received reimbursement, honoraria, or stipends for their participation in the development of the guideline.

Dr. Culebras has received one-time funding for travel from J. Uriach & Co, and he serves on the editorial boards of MedLink, UpToDate.com, and the International Journal of Stroke. He has received royalties from Informa Healthcare and Cambridge University Press, and has held stock in Clinical Stroke Research. Other authors reported current or past ties to companies marketing oral anticoagulants and stroke treatments.

Dr. Bernstein was on the steering committee for the CRYSTAL-AF study and is a paid speaker, researcher, and consultant for Medtronic, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Lifewatch.

*Correction, 4/8/2014: The article previously misstated what the implantable device was detecting in the CRYSTAL-AF study.

Body


Dr. Richard Bernstein

These guidelines are a missed opportunity to empower neurologists to advocate in favor of anticoagulation to prevent stroke. The biggest public health problem in AF is that only half of patients who need anticoagulation are getting it. This disgraceful state of affairs results in patients having cardioembolic strokes that are fatal or worse and that could have been prevented. We neurologists see these complications of inadequate treatment and should be on the front lines of prevention. These tepid guidelines give as much space to bleeding as they do to ischemic stroke prevention, which is inappropriate, and I fear will make neurologists, who are not terribly assertive under any circumstances, even less willing to push doctors to use anticoagulants. 

I would have been happier with a single page that said: "Stop using aspirin. Patients fear major stroke more than they fear bleeding or death, and they are right. Stop undertreating your patients and start preventing strokes." 

Dr. Richard A. Bernstein is professor of neurology and director of the stroke program at Northwestern University, Chicago. 

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, cardioembolic stroke, neurology, American Academy of Neurology, cardiac rhythm monitoring, anticoagulation, warfarin, CRYSTAL-AF study, cardiac rhythm monitoring, cryptogenic stroke
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Body


Dr. Richard Bernstein

These guidelines are a missed opportunity to empower neurologists to advocate in favor of anticoagulation to prevent stroke. The biggest public health problem in AF is that only half of patients who need anticoagulation are getting it. This disgraceful state of affairs results in patients having cardioembolic strokes that are fatal or worse and that could have been prevented. We neurologists see these complications of inadequate treatment and should be on the front lines of prevention. These tepid guidelines give as much space to bleeding as they do to ischemic stroke prevention, which is inappropriate, and I fear will make neurologists, who are not terribly assertive under any circumstances, even less willing to push doctors to use anticoagulants. 

I would have been happier with a single page that said: "Stop using aspirin. Patients fear major stroke more than they fear bleeding or death, and they are right. Stop undertreating your patients and start preventing strokes." 

Dr. Richard A. Bernstein is professor of neurology and director of the stroke program at Northwestern University, Chicago. 

Body


Dr. Richard Bernstein

These guidelines are a missed opportunity to empower neurologists to advocate in favor of anticoagulation to prevent stroke. The biggest public health problem in AF is that only half of patients who need anticoagulation are getting it. This disgraceful state of affairs results in patients having cardioembolic strokes that are fatal or worse and that could have been prevented. We neurologists see these complications of inadequate treatment and should be on the front lines of prevention. These tepid guidelines give as much space to bleeding as they do to ischemic stroke prevention, which is inappropriate, and I fear will make neurologists, who are not terribly assertive under any circumstances, even less willing to push doctors to use anticoagulants. 

I would have been happier with a single page that said: "Stop using aspirin. Patients fear major stroke more than they fear bleeding or death, and they are right. Stop undertreating your patients and start preventing strokes." 

Dr. Richard A. Bernstein is professor of neurology and director of the stroke program at Northwestern University, Chicago. 

Title
'Tepid guidelines' miss opportunity
'Tepid guidelines' miss opportunity

A new evidence-based guideline on how to identify and treat patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation to prevent cardioembolic stroke from the American Academy of Neurology suggests when to conduct cardiac rhythm monitoring and offer anticoagulation, including newer agents in place of warfarin.

But the guideline might already be outdated in not considering the results of the recent CRYSTAL-AF study, in which long-term cardiac rhythm monitoring of patients with a previous cryptogenic stroke detected asymptomatic patients at a significantly higher rate than did standard monitoring methods.

Dr. Antonio Culebras

The guideline also extends the routine use of anticoagulation for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who are generally undertreated or whose health was thought a possible barrier to their use, such as those aged 75 years or older, those with mild dementia, and those at moderate risk of falls.

"Cognizant of the global reach of the AAN [American Academy of Neurology], the guideline also examines the evidence base for a treatment alternative to warfarin or its analogues for patients in developing countries who may not have access to the new oral anticoagulants," said lead author Dr. Antonio Culebras in an interview.

"The World Health Organization has determined that atrial fibrillation has reached near-epidemic proportions," observed Dr. Culebras of the State University of New York, Syracuse. "Approximately 1 in 20 individuals with AF will have a stroke unless treated appropriately."

The risk for stroke among patients with NVAF is highest in those with a history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or prior stroke, at an absolute value of around 10% per year. Patients with "lone NVAF," meaning they have no additional risk factors, have less than a 2% increased risk of stroke per year.

The AAN issued a practice parameter on this topic in 1998 (Neurology 1998;51:671-3). At the time, warfarin, adjusted to an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0, was, and largely remains, the recommended standard for patients at risk for cardioembolic stroke. Aspirin was the only recommended alterative for those unable to receive the vitamin K antagonist or who were deemed to be at low risk of stroke, although the evidence was scanty.

Since then, several new oral anticoagulant agents have become available, including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran (Pradaxa), and two factor Xa inhibitors – rivaroxaban (Xarelto) and apixaban (Eliquis) – which have been shown to be at least as effective as, if not more effective than, warfarin. Cardiac rhythm monitoring via a variety of methods has also been introduced as a means to try to detect NVAF in asymptomatic patients.

The aim of the AAN guideline (Neurology 2014;82:716-24) was therefore to look at the latest evidence on the detection of AF using new technologies, as well as the use of treatments to reduce the risk of stroke without increasing the risk of hemorrhage versus the long-standing standard of therapy, warfarin. Data published from 1998 to March 2013 were considered in the preparation of the guideline.

Cardiac rhythm monitoring for NVAF

Seventeen studies were found that examined the use of cardiac monitoring technologies to detect new cases of NVAF. The most common methods used were 24-hour Holter monitoring and serial electrocardiograms, but some emerging evidence on newer technologies was included. The proportion of patients identified with NVAF ranged from 0% to 23%, with the average detection rate 10.7% in all of the studies included.

"The guideline addresses the question of long-term monitoring of patients with NVAF," Dr. Culebras said. "It recommends that clinicians ‘might’ [level C evidence] obtain outpatient cardiac rhythm studies in patients with cryptogenic stroke without known NVAF to identify patients with occult NVAF." He added that the guideline also recommends that monitoring might be needed for prolonged periods of 1 or more weeks rather than for shorter periods, such as 24 hours.

However, at the time the guideline was being prepared, recent data from the CRYSTAL-AF study were not available, and this means the guideline is already outdated, Dr. Richard A. Bernstein, professor of neurology at Northwestern University, Chicago, said in an interview. He was not a guideline author.

Dr. Bernstein was on the steering committee for the CRYSTAL-AF trial, which assessed the performance of Medtronic’s Reveal XT Insertable Cardiac Monitor and found that the implanted device could detect NVAF better than serial ECGs or Holter monitoring (8.6% vs. 1.4%; P = .0006); most (74%) cases of NVAF found were asymptomatic.*

"CRYSTAL-AF represents the state of the art for cardiac monitoring in cryptogenic stroke patients and makes the AAN guidelines obsolete," Dr. Berstein said. "[The study] shows that even intermediate-term monitoring (less than 1 month) will miss the majority of AF in this population, and that most of the AF we find with long-term (greater than 1 year) monitoring is likely to be clinically significant."

 

 

With regard to the AAN guideline, he added: "There is no discussion of truly long-term monitoring in the guideline, which is unfortunate." That said, "anything that gets neurologists thinking about long-term cardiac monitoring is likely to be beneficial."

Anticoagulation for stroke prevention

The AAN guideline also provides general recommendations on the use of novel oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) as alternatives to warfarin. Specifically, it notes that in comparison with warfarin, these NOACs are probably at least as effective (rivaroxaban) or more effective (dabigatran and apixaban). Additionally, while apixaban is also likely to be more effective than aspirin, it is associated with a similar risk for bleeding. NOACs have the following advantages over warfarin: an overall lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage and no need for routine anticoagulant monitoring.

From a practical perspective, the AAN guideline suggests that clinicians have the following options available: warfarin to reach an INR of 2.0-3.0, dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, rivaroxaban 15-20 mg/dL, apixaban 2.5-5 mg twice a day, and triflusal 600 mg plus acenocoumarol to reach an INR target of 1.25-2.0. If a patient is already taking warfarin and is well controlled, then they should remain on that therapy and not switch to a newer oral anticoagulant.

The guideline also notes that clopidogrel plus aspirin is probably less effective than warfarin, but the combination is probably better than aspirin alone. However, the risk of hemorrhage is higher.

Where used, triflusal plus acenocoumarol is "likely more effective" than acenocoumarol alone. Triflusal is an antiplatelet drug related to aspirin, used in Europe, Latin America, and Southeast Asia. Acenocoumarol is mostly used in European countries.

Dr. Culebras explained that the guideline was not intended to dictate which treatment to use. "The guideline leaves room on purpose for clinicians to use their judgment," he said. "The overall objective of the guideline is to reduce therapeutic uncertainty and not to issue commandments for treatment."

Although Dr. Bernstein was critical of the guidelines for not advocating the use of anticoagulants strongly enough, he said that the recommendations on anticoagulant choice are "reasonable in that they impute potential clinical profiles of patients who might particularly benefit from one NOAC over another, without making a claim that these recommendations are based on solid data. This reflects how doctors make decisions when we don’t have direct comparative studies, and I think that is helpful."

The guideline was developed with financial support from the American Academy of Neurology. None of the authors received reimbursement, honoraria, or stipends for their participation in the development of the guideline.

Dr. Culebras has received one-time funding for travel from J. Uriach & Co, and he serves on the editorial boards of MedLink, UpToDate.com, and the International Journal of Stroke. He has received royalties from Informa Healthcare and Cambridge University Press, and has held stock in Clinical Stroke Research. Other authors reported current or past ties to companies marketing oral anticoagulants and stroke treatments.

Dr. Bernstein was on the steering committee for the CRYSTAL-AF study and is a paid speaker, researcher, and consultant for Medtronic, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Lifewatch.

*Correction, 4/8/2014: The article previously misstated what the implantable device was detecting in the CRYSTAL-AF study.

A new evidence-based guideline on how to identify and treat patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation to prevent cardioembolic stroke from the American Academy of Neurology suggests when to conduct cardiac rhythm monitoring and offer anticoagulation, including newer agents in place of warfarin.

But the guideline might already be outdated in not considering the results of the recent CRYSTAL-AF study, in which long-term cardiac rhythm monitoring of patients with a previous cryptogenic stroke detected asymptomatic patients at a significantly higher rate than did standard monitoring methods.

Dr. Antonio Culebras

The guideline also extends the routine use of anticoagulation for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who are generally undertreated or whose health was thought a possible barrier to their use, such as those aged 75 years or older, those with mild dementia, and those at moderate risk of falls.

"Cognizant of the global reach of the AAN [American Academy of Neurology], the guideline also examines the evidence base for a treatment alternative to warfarin or its analogues for patients in developing countries who may not have access to the new oral anticoagulants," said lead author Dr. Antonio Culebras in an interview.

"The World Health Organization has determined that atrial fibrillation has reached near-epidemic proportions," observed Dr. Culebras of the State University of New York, Syracuse. "Approximately 1 in 20 individuals with AF will have a stroke unless treated appropriately."

The risk for stroke among patients with NVAF is highest in those with a history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or prior stroke, at an absolute value of around 10% per year. Patients with "lone NVAF," meaning they have no additional risk factors, have less than a 2% increased risk of stroke per year.

The AAN issued a practice parameter on this topic in 1998 (Neurology 1998;51:671-3). At the time, warfarin, adjusted to an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0, was, and largely remains, the recommended standard for patients at risk for cardioembolic stroke. Aspirin was the only recommended alterative for those unable to receive the vitamin K antagonist or who were deemed to be at low risk of stroke, although the evidence was scanty.

Since then, several new oral anticoagulant agents have become available, including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran (Pradaxa), and two factor Xa inhibitors – rivaroxaban (Xarelto) and apixaban (Eliquis) – which have been shown to be at least as effective as, if not more effective than, warfarin. Cardiac rhythm monitoring via a variety of methods has also been introduced as a means to try to detect NVAF in asymptomatic patients.

The aim of the AAN guideline (Neurology 2014;82:716-24) was therefore to look at the latest evidence on the detection of AF using new technologies, as well as the use of treatments to reduce the risk of stroke without increasing the risk of hemorrhage versus the long-standing standard of therapy, warfarin. Data published from 1998 to March 2013 were considered in the preparation of the guideline.

Cardiac rhythm monitoring for NVAF

Seventeen studies were found that examined the use of cardiac monitoring technologies to detect new cases of NVAF. The most common methods used were 24-hour Holter monitoring and serial electrocardiograms, but some emerging evidence on newer technologies was included. The proportion of patients identified with NVAF ranged from 0% to 23%, with the average detection rate 10.7% in all of the studies included.

"The guideline addresses the question of long-term monitoring of patients with NVAF," Dr. Culebras said. "It recommends that clinicians ‘might’ [level C evidence] obtain outpatient cardiac rhythm studies in patients with cryptogenic stroke without known NVAF to identify patients with occult NVAF." He added that the guideline also recommends that monitoring might be needed for prolonged periods of 1 or more weeks rather than for shorter periods, such as 24 hours.

However, at the time the guideline was being prepared, recent data from the CRYSTAL-AF study were not available, and this means the guideline is already outdated, Dr. Richard A. Bernstein, professor of neurology at Northwestern University, Chicago, said in an interview. He was not a guideline author.

Dr. Bernstein was on the steering committee for the CRYSTAL-AF trial, which assessed the performance of Medtronic’s Reveal XT Insertable Cardiac Monitor and found that the implanted device could detect NVAF better than serial ECGs or Holter monitoring (8.6% vs. 1.4%; P = .0006); most (74%) cases of NVAF found were asymptomatic.*

"CRYSTAL-AF represents the state of the art for cardiac monitoring in cryptogenic stroke patients and makes the AAN guidelines obsolete," Dr. Berstein said. "[The study] shows that even intermediate-term monitoring (less than 1 month) will miss the majority of AF in this population, and that most of the AF we find with long-term (greater than 1 year) monitoring is likely to be clinically significant."

 

 

With regard to the AAN guideline, he added: "There is no discussion of truly long-term monitoring in the guideline, which is unfortunate." That said, "anything that gets neurologists thinking about long-term cardiac monitoring is likely to be beneficial."

Anticoagulation for stroke prevention

The AAN guideline also provides general recommendations on the use of novel oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) as alternatives to warfarin. Specifically, it notes that in comparison with warfarin, these NOACs are probably at least as effective (rivaroxaban) or more effective (dabigatran and apixaban). Additionally, while apixaban is also likely to be more effective than aspirin, it is associated with a similar risk for bleeding. NOACs have the following advantages over warfarin: an overall lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage and no need for routine anticoagulant monitoring.

From a practical perspective, the AAN guideline suggests that clinicians have the following options available: warfarin to reach an INR of 2.0-3.0, dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, rivaroxaban 15-20 mg/dL, apixaban 2.5-5 mg twice a day, and triflusal 600 mg plus acenocoumarol to reach an INR target of 1.25-2.0. If a patient is already taking warfarin and is well controlled, then they should remain on that therapy and not switch to a newer oral anticoagulant.

The guideline also notes that clopidogrel plus aspirin is probably less effective than warfarin, but the combination is probably better than aspirin alone. However, the risk of hemorrhage is higher.

Where used, triflusal plus acenocoumarol is "likely more effective" than acenocoumarol alone. Triflusal is an antiplatelet drug related to aspirin, used in Europe, Latin America, and Southeast Asia. Acenocoumarol is mostly used in European countries.

Dr. Culebras explained that the guideline was not intended to dictate which treatment to use. "The guideline leaves room on purpose for clinicians to use their judgment," he said. "The overall objective of the guideline is to reduce therapeutic uncertainty and not to issue commandments for treatment."

Although Dr. Bernstein was critical of the guidelines for not advocating the use of anticoagulants strongly enough, he said that the recommendations on anticoagulant choice are "reasonable in that they impute potential clinical profiles of patients who might particularly benefit from one NOAC over another, without making a claim that these recommendations are based on solid data. This reflects how doctors make decisions when we don’t have direct comparative studies, and I think that is helpful."

The guideline was developed with financial support from the American Academy of Neurology. None of the authors received reimbursement, honoraria, or stipends for their participation in the development of the guideline.

Dr. Culebras has received one-time funding for travel from J. Uriach & Co, and he serves on the editorial boards of MedLink, UpToDate.com, and the International Journal of Stroke. He has received royalties from Informa Healthcare and Cambridge University Press, and has held stock in Clinical Stroke Research. Other authors reported current or past ties to companies marketing oral anticoagulants and stroke treatments.

Dr. Bernstein was on the steering committee for the CRYSTAL-AF study and is a paid speaker, researcher, and consultant for Medtronic, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Lifewatch.

*Correction, 4/8/2014: The article previously misstated what the implantable device was detecting in the CRYSTAL-AF study.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
AAN issues nonvalvular atrial fibrillation stroke prevention guideline
Display Headline
AAN issues nonvalvular atrial fibrillation stroke prevention guideline
Legacy Keywords
nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, cardioembolic stroke, neurology, American Academy of Neurology, cardiac rhythm monitoring, anticoagulation, warfarin, CRYSTAL-AF study, cardiac rhythm monitoring, cryptogenic stroke
Legacy Keywords
nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, cardioembolic stroke, neurology, American Academy of Neurology, cardiac rhythm monitoring, anticoagulation, warfarin, CRYSTAL-AF study, cardiac rhythm monitoring, cryptogenic stroke
Sections
Article Source

FROM NEUROLOGY

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Mammogram data are not to die for

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 12:08
Display Headline
Mammogram data are not to die for

I remember that day like it was yesterday, though it occurred more than a decade ago. I stood leaning over a black entertainment center in my family room, legs wobbly, heart weary – a surreal and solemn snapshot in time. From a speaker streamed a now-favorite Donnie McClurkin song, called "Stand," with its introspective lyrics: "You’ve prayed and you’ve cried ... . After you’ve done all you can, you just stand."

In the next room I could hear her softly gurgling on her secretions. I needed a moment, no, two or three moments, to collect my thoughts and pull myself together before I returned to face the nightmare I was living. My mother was actively dying in my guestroom. Why? I believed then and, today, many years later, believe just as strongly it was because she had not been getting her mammograms.

National Institutes of Health/Department of Health and Human Services
Many women consider themselves at low risk for breast cancer if they have no close relatives with the disease, the author writes.

As a writer, sometimes I struggle with how personal to get in my blogs, but rest assured. I got her permission to share her story while she was still very lucid and competent. You see, she did not want others’ lives to end as hers was ending. She realized, in her final stages of life, that things would have likely been much different had she had her screening mammograms as recommended.

By the time of her diagnosis in her early 60s, the cancer had already spread. Would a mammogram in her late 50s have saved her life? I believe so, and I’m not alone. So I take issue with a recent article published in BMJ that downplays the significance of mammography (BMJ 2014;348:g366).

In 1980, Canadian researchers randomized 89,835 women, aged 40-59 to receive five annual mammograms or physical breast examinations. They followed these women over a 25-year period, and concluded that yearly mammography in women aged 40-59 did not decrease breast cancer mortality "beyond that of physical examination or usual care when adjuvant therapy for breast cancer is freely available."

Well, how many of us have taken care of women in their 50s, 40s, and even 30s with terminal breast cancer? How many of us would advise a mother, aunt, sister (or self) not to have routine mammography? Not many, I’m sure. There is the art of medicine and the science of medicine. Sometimes these two clash, but I believe the art of medicine is realizing that the science of medicine really doesn’t matter to dying patients and their family members. Sometimes, we have to act in the best interest of individual patients and not rely too heavily on the "data." Data changes, risk factors emerge, or research findings may prove to be skewed or wrong in hindsight. Explains Dr. Poornima Sharma, an oncologist/hematologist at the University of Maryland Baltimore-Washington Medical Center: "While the methodology, mammographic technique, and equipment used in the Canadian study is being assessed and compared to the mammography standards used in the United States, the standard in this country remains annual mammography starting at age 40."

 Still, many women consider themselves at low risk for breast cancer if they have no close relatives with the disease. As erroneous as this assumption may be, this subset of women may be particularly vulnerable to the implication that yearly mammography is not needed.

So do this: Discuss screening mammography with your own family and then use those feelings when a teachable moment presents itself at bedside.

Our patients rely on us to look into their eyes and give them our best advice. Even though I am a hospitalist, there are still those women I feel compelled to counsel about screening mammography, and this study will not lessen my fervor. 

Dr. Hester is a hospitalist with Baltimore-Washington Medical Center who has a passion for empowering patients to partner in their health care. She is the creator of the Patient Whiz, a patient-engagement app for iOS.

Author and Disclosure Information

Legacy Keywords
mammography, mammogram, A. Maria Hester, Teachable Moments,
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

I remember that day like it was yesterday, though it occurred more than a decade ago. I stood leaning over a black entertainment center in my family room, legs wobbly, heart weary – a surreal and solemn snapshot in time. From a speaker streamed a now-favorite Donnie McClurkin song, called "Stand," with its introspective lyrics: "You’ve prayed and you’ve cried ... . After you’ve done all you can, you just stand."

In the next room I could hear her softly gurgling on her secretions. I needed a moment, no, two or three moments, to collect my thoughts and pull myself together before I returned to face the nightmare I was living. My mother was actively dying in my guestroom. Why? I believed then and, today, many years later, believe just as strongly it was because she had not been getting her mammograms.

National Institutes of Health/Department of Health and Human Services
Many women consider themselves at low risk for breast cancer if they have no close relatives with the disease, the author writes.

As a writer, sometimes I struggle with how personal to get in my blogs, but rest assured. I got her permission to share her story while she was still very lucid and competent. You see, she did not want others’ lives to end as hers was ending. She realized, in her final stages of life, that things would have likely been much different had she had her screening mammograms as recommended.

By the time of her diagnosis in her early 60s, the cancer had already spread. Would a mammogram in her late 50s have saved her life? I believe so, and I’m not alone. So I take issue with a recent article published in BMJ that downplays the significance of mammography (BMJ 2014;348:g366).

In 1980, Canadian researchers randomized 89,835 women, aged 40-59 to receive five annual mammograms or physical breast examinations. They followed these women over a 25-year period, and concluded that yearly mammography in women aged 40-59 did not decrease breast cancer mortality "beyond that of physical examination or usual care when adjuvant therapy for breast cancer is freely available."

Well, how many of us have taken care of women in their 50s, 40s, and even 30s with terminal breast cancer? How many of us would advise a mother, aunt, sister (or self) not to have routine mammography? Not many, I’m sure. There is the art of medicine and the science of medicine. Sometimes these two clash, but I believe the art of medicine is realizing that the science of medicine really doesn’t matter to dying patients and their family members. Sometimes, we have to act in the best interest of individual patients and not rely too heavily on the "data." Data changes, risk factors emerge, or research findings may prove to be skewed or wrong in hindsight. Explains Dr. Poornima Sharma, an oncologist/hematologist at the University of Maryland Baltimore-Washington Medical Center: "While the methodology, mammographic technique, and equipment used in the Canadian study is being assessed and compared to the mammography standards used in the United States, the standard in this country remains annual mammography starting at age 40."

 Still, many women consider themselves at low risk for breast cancer if they have no close relatives with the disease. As erroneous as this assumption may be, this subset of women may be particularly vulnerable to the implication that yearly mammography is not needed.

So do this: Discuss screening mammography with your own family and then use those feelings when a teachable moment presents itself at bedside.

Our patients rely on us to look into their eyes and give them our best advice. Even though I am a hospitalist, there are still those women I feel compelled to counsel about screening mammography, and this study will not lessen my fervor. 

Dr. Hester is a hospitalist with Baltimore-Washington Medical Center who has a passion for empowering patients to partner in their health care. She is the creator of the Patient Whiz, a patient-engagement app for iOS.

I remember that day like it was yesterday, though it occurred more than a decade ago. I stood leaning over a black entertainment center in my family room, legs wobbly, heart weary – a surreal and solemn snapshot in time. From a speaker streamed a now-favorite Donnie McClurkin song, called "Stand," with its introspective lyrics: "You’ve prayed and you’ve cried ... . After you’ve done all you can, you just stand."

In the next room I could hear her softly gurgling on her secretions. I needed a moment, no, two or three moments, to collect my thoughts and pull myself together before I returned to face the nightmare I was living. My mother was actively dying in my guestroom. Why? I believed then and, today, many years later, believe just as strongly it was because she had not been getting her mammograms.

National Institutes of Health/Department of Health and Human Services
Many women consider themselves at low risk for breast cancer if they have no close relatives with the disease, the author writes.

As a writer, sometimes I struggle with how personal to get in my blogs, but rest assured. I got her permission to share her story while she was still very lucid and competent. You see, she did not want others’ lives to end as hers was ending. She realized, in her final stages of life, that things would have likely been much different had she had her screening mammograms as recommended.

By the time of her diagnosis in her early 60s, the cancer had already spread. Would a mammogram in her late 50s have saved her life? I believe so, and I’m not alone. So I take issue with a recent article published in BMJ that downplays the significance of mammography (BMJ 2014;348:g366).

In 1980, Canadian researchers randomized 89,835 women, aged 40-59 to receive five annual mammograms or physical breast examinations. They followed these women over a 25-year period, and concluded that yearly mammography in women aged 40-59 did not decrease breast cancer mortality "beyond that of physical examination or usual care when adjuvant therapy for breast cancer is freely available."

Well, how many of us have taken care of women in their 50s, 40s, and even 30s with terminal breast cancer? How many of us would advise a mother, aunt, sister (or self) not to have routine mammography? Not many, I’m sure. There is the art of medicine and the science of medicine. Sometimes these two clash, but I believe the art of medicine is realizing that the science of medicine really doesn’t matter to dying patients and their family members. Sometimes, we have to act in the best interest of individual patients and not rely too heavily on the "data." Data changes, risk factors emerge, or research findings may prove to be skewed or wrong in hindsight. Explains Dr. Poornima Sharma, an oncologist/hematologist at the University of Maryland Baltimore-Washington Medical Center: "While the methodology, mammographic technique, and equipment used in the Canadian study is being assessed and compared to the mammography standards used in the United States, the standard in this country remains annual mammography starting at age 40."

 Still, many women consider themselves at low risk for breast cancer if they have no close relatives with the disease. As erroneous as this assumption may be, this subset of women may be particularly vulnerable to the implication that yearly mammography is not needed.

So do this: Discuss screening mammography with your own family and then use those feelings when a teachable moment presents itself at bedside.

Our patients rely on us to look into their eyes and give them our best advice. Even though I am a hospitalist, there are still those women I feel compelled to counsel about screening mammography, and this study will not lessen my fervor. 

Dr. Hester is a hospitalist with Baltimore-Washington Medical Center who has a passion for empowering patients to partner in their health care. She is the creator of the Patient Whiz, a patient-engagement app for iOS.

Article Type
Display Headline
Mammogram data are not to die for
Display Headline
Mammogram data are not to die for
Legacy Keywords
mammography, mammogram, A. Maria Hester, Teachable Moments,
Legacy Keywords
mammography, mammogram, A. Maria Hester, Teachable Moments,
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Protein appears essential to malaria transmission

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 02/24/2014 - 06:00
Display Headline
Protein appears essential to malaria transmission

P falciparum parasites in the

gametocyte stage (blue) and

uninfected red blood cells

Credit: The Llinás lab

Results of 2 new studies suggest that a single regulatory protein acts as a master switch to trigger development of the sexual forms of malaria parasites.

It appears that the protein, AP2-G, is necessary for activating a set of genes that initiate the development of Plasmodium gametocytes, the only forms of the parasite that are infectious to mosquitoes.

This suggests that if researchers can target AP2-G, they can stop sexual parasites from forming.

And if the sexual forms of the parasite never develop in an infected person’s blood, none will enter the mosquito’s gut, and the mosquito will be unable to infect anyone else with malaria.

“Exciting opportunities now lie ahead for finding an effective way to break the chain of malaria transmission by preventing the malaria parasite from completing its full lifecycle,” said Manuel Llinás, PhD, a professor at Pennsylvania State University who was involved in both studies.

The 2 studies, which were published as letters to Nature, had remarkably similar results, despite the fact that the groups worked with 2 different malaria parasites—Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium berghei.

In one study, researchers analyzed the whole-genome sequences of 2 P falciparum strains that were unable to produce gametocytes. The only mutated, non-functional gene common to both strains was the AP2-G gene.

In the other study, researchers sequenced P berghei parasites that had lost their ability to make gametocytes. Again, the only common mutated gene in these parasites was AP2-G.

To confirm these observations, both groups of researchers disabled the AP2-G gene in parasites that could generate gametocytes.

As expected, disabling the gene prevented the parasites from producing gametocytes. But the parasites regained their ability to make gametocytes when the mutated gene was repaired.

These results, as well as results of additional experiments, suggest that sexual-stage malaria parasites are produced only when the AP2-G protein is in working order.

“Our research has demonstrated unequivocally that the AP2-G transcription factor protein is essential for flipping the switch that initiates the transformation of malaria parasites in the blood from the asexual stage to the critical sexual stage of their life cycle,” Dr Llinás said.

He and his colleagues believe their discovery is exciting for the future of malaria research. It could spur the development of a sexual-stage vaccine, which would help a person infected with malaria mount an immune response to prevent their parasites from being transmitted to a mosquito, effectively ending the life cycle for that person’s batch of malaria parasites.

Publications
Topics

P falciparum parasites in the

gametocyte stage (blue) and

uninfected red blood cells

Credit: The Llinás lab

Results of 2 new studies suggest that a single regulatory protein acts as a master switch to trigger development of the sexual forms of malaria parasites.

It appears that the protein, AP2-G, is necessary for activating a set of genes that initiate the development of Plasmodium gametocytes, the only forms of the parasite that are infectious to mosquitoes.

This suggests that if researchers can target AP2-G, they can stop sexual parasites from forming.

And if the sexual forms of the parasite never develop in an infected person’s blood, none will enter the mosquito’s gut, and the mosquito will be unable to infect anyone else with malaria.

“Exciting opportunities now lie ahead for finding an effective way to break the chain of malaria transmission by preventing the malaria parasite from completing its full lifecycle,” said Manuel Llinás, PhD, a professor at Pennsylvania State University who was involved in both studies.

The 2 studies, which were published as letters to Nature, had remarkably similar results, despite the fact that the groups worked with 2 different malaria parasites—Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium berghei.

In one study, researchers analyzed the whole-genome sequences of 2 P falciparum strains that were unable to produce gametocytes. The only mutated, non-functional gene common to both strains was the AP2-G gene.

In the other study, researchers sequenced P berghei parasites that had lost their ability to make gametocytes. Again, the only common mutated gene in these parasites was AP2-G.

To confirm these observations, both groups of researchers disabled the AP2-G gene in parasites that could generate gametocytes.

As expected, disabling the gene prevented the parasites from producing gametocytes. But the parasites regained their ability to make gametocytes when the mutated gene was repaired.

These results, as well as results of additional experiments, suggest that sexual-stage malaria parasites are produced only when the AP2-G protein is in working order.

“Our research has demonstrated unequivocally that the AP2-G transcription factor protein is essential for flipping the switch that initiates the transformation of malaria parasites in the blood from the asexual stage to the critical sexual stage of their life cycle,” Dr Llinás said.

He and his colleagues believe their discovery is exciting for the future of malaria research. It could spur the development of a sexual-stage vaccine, which would help a person infected with malaria mount an immune response to prevent their parasites from being transmitted to a mosquito, effectively ending the life cycle for that person’s batch of malaria parasites.

P falciparum parasites in the

gametocyte stage (blue) and

uninfected red blood cells

Credit: The Llinás lab

Results of 2 new studies suggest that a single regulatory protein acts as a master switch to trigger development of the sexual forms of malaria parasites.

It appears that the protein, AP2-G, is necessary for activating a set of genes that initiate the development of Plasmodium gametocytes, the only forms of the parasite that are infectious to mosquitoes.

This suggests that if researchers can target AP2-G, they can stop sexual parasites from forming.

And if the sexual forms of the parasite never develop in an infected person’s blood, none will enter the mosquito’s gut, and the mosquito will be unable to infect anyone else with malaria.

“Exciting opportunities now lie ahead for finding an effective way to break the chain of malaria transmission by preventing the malaria parasite from completing its full lifecycle,” said Manuel Llinás, PhD, a professor at Pennsylvania State University who was involved in both studies.

The 2 studies, which were published as letters to Nature, had remarkably similar results, despite the fact that the groups worked with 2 different malaria parasites—Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium berghei.

In one study, researchers analyzed the whole-genome sequences of 2 P falciparum strains that were unable to produce gametocytes. The only mutated, non-functional gene common to both strains was the AP2-G gene.

In the other study, researchers sequenced P berghei parasites that had lost their ability to make gametocytes. Again, the only common mutated gene in these parasites was AP2-G.

To confirm these observations, both groups of researchers disabled the AP2-G gene in parasites that could generate gametocytes.

As expected, disabling the gene prevented the parasites from producing gametocytes. But the parasites regained their ability to make gametocytes when the mutated gene was repaired.

These results, as well as results of additional experiments, suggest that sexual-stage malaria parasites are produced only when the AP2-G protein is in working order.

“Our research has demonstrated unequivocally that the AP2-G transcription factor protein is essential for flipping the switch that initiates the transformation of malaria parasites in the blood from the asexual stage to the critical sexual stage of their life cycle,” Dr Llinás said.

He and his colleagues believe their discovery is exciting for the future of malaria research. It could spur the development of a sexual-stage vaccine, which would help a person infected with malaria mount an immune response to prevent their parasites from being transmitted to a mosquito, effectively ending the life cycle for that person’s batch of malaria parasites.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Protein appears essential to malaria transmission
Display Headline
Protein appears essential to malaria transmission
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Drug could enhance effects of chemo

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 02/24/2014 - 06:00
Display Headline
Drug could enhance effects of chemo

Patient receiving chemotherapy

Credit: Rhoda Baer

The drug spironolactone could improve the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy by preventing tumor cell repair, according to research published in Chemistry & Biology.

The researchers knew that platinum-based chemotherapy drugs bind to cellular DNA to induce damage.

So they theorized that blocking DNA repair mechanisms would help potentiate chemotherapy by reducing cancer cells’ resistance to treatment.

The team focused their efforts on inhibiting nucleotide excision repair (NER), in which a damaged DNA fragment is replaced with an intact fragment.

Frédéric Coin, PhD, of the Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology in Illkirch, France, and his colleagues screened more than 1200 drugs looking for one that would inhibit NER activity.

And they found that spironolactone—a drug already used to treat fluid retention, high blood pressure, and other conditions—affects NER activity.

Specifically, the team found that, when combined with platinum derivatives, spironolactone significantly increased cytotoxicity in ovarian and colon cancer cells.

As platinum-based chemotherapy is used to treat a range of cancers, similar results might occur in other malignancies as well.

The researchers also noted that, because spironolactone is already in use for other purposes, it doesn’t require a new application for marketing authorization. And its side effects are already known.

The team said this suggests that protocols testing spironolactone in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy could be organized rather quickly.

Publications
Topics

Patient receiving chemotherapy

Credit: Rhoda Baer

The drug spironolactone could improve the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy by preventing tumor cell repair, according to research published in Chemistry & Biology.

The researchers knew that platinum-based chemotherapy drugs bind to cellular DNA to induce damage.

So they theorized that blocking DNA repair mechanisms would help potentiate chemotherapy by reducing cancer cells’ resistance to treatment.

The team focused their efforts on inhibiting nucleotide excision repair (NER), in which a damaged DNA fragment is replaced with an intact fragment.

Frédéric Coin, PhD, of the Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology in Illkirch, France, and his colleagues screened more than 1200 drugs looking for one that would inhibit NER activity.

And they found that spironolactone—a drug already used to treat fluid retention, high blood pressure, and other conditions—affects NER activity.

Specifically, the team found that, when combined with platinum derivatives, spironolactone significantly increased cytotoxicity in ovarian and colon cancer cells.

As platinum-based chemotherapy is used to treat a range of cancers, similar results might occur in other malignancies as well.

The researchers also noted that, because spironolactone is already in use for other purposes, it doesn’t require a new application for marketing authorization. And its side effects are already known.

The team said this suggests that protocols testing spironolactone in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy could be organized rather quickly.

Patient receiving chemotherapy

Credit: Rhoda Baer

The drug spironolactone could improve the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy by preventing tumor cell repair, according to research published in Chemistry & Biology.

The researchers knew that platinum-based chemotherapy drugs bind to cellular DNA to induce damage.

So they theorized that blocking DNA repair mechanisms would help potentiate chemotherapy by reducing cancer cells’ resistance to treatment.

The team focused their efforts on inhibiting nucleotide excision repair (NER), in which a damaged DNA fragment is replaced with an intact fragment.

Frédéric Coin, PhD, of the Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology in Illkirch, France, and his colleagues screened more than 1200 drugs looking for one that would inhibit NER activity.

And they found that spironolactone—a drug already used to treat fluid retention, high blood pressure, and other conditions—affects NER activity.

Specifically, the team found that, when combined with platinum derivatives, spironolactone significantly increased cytotoxicity in ovarian and colon cancer cells.

As platinum-based chemotherapy is used to treat a range of cancers, similar results might occur in other malignancies as well.

The researchers also noted that, because spironolactone is already in use for other purposes, it doesn’t require a new application for marketing authorization. And its side effects are already known.

The team said this suggests that protocols testing spironolactone in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy could be organized rather quickly.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Drug could enhance effects of chemo
Display Headline
Drug could enhance effects of chemo
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Evolving Role of the PNP Hospitalist

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/02/2017 - 19:34
Display Headline
The evolving role of the pediatric nurse practitioner in hospital medicine

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education implemented rules limiting work hours for residents in 2003 and 2011, decreasing the availability of residents as providers at teaching hospitals.[1] These restrictions have increased reliance on advance practice providers (APPs) including nurse practitioners (NPs) and physicians' assistants in providing inpatient care. The NP hospitalist role includes inpatient medical management, coordination of care, patient and staff education, and quality improvement activities.[2] The NP hospitalist role has expanded beyond a replacement for reduced resident work hours, adding value through resident teaching, development of clinical care guidelines (CCGs), continuity of care, and familiarity with inpatient management.[3] The NP hospitalist role has been shown to improve the quality, efficiency, and cost effectiveness of inpatient care.[4, 5]

Favorable quality and cost measure results have been documented for adult NP hospitalists compared to housestaff, including improved patient outcomes, increased patient and staff satisfaction, decreased length of stay (LOS) and cost of care, and improved access to care.[6] These findings are supported by NP inpatient program evaluations at several academic medical centers, which also show increased patient and family satisfaction and improved communication between physicians, nurses, and families.[6, 7, 8] One study demonstrated that collaborative care management of adult medical patients by a hospitalist physician and advanced practice nurse led to decreased LOS and improved hospital profit without changing patient readmission or mortality.[9] Although there is a growing body of evidence supporting the quality and cost effectiveness of the NP hospitalist role in adult inpatient care, there are little published data for pediatric programs.

METHODS

The pediatric nurse practitioner (PNP) hospitalist role at Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO) was initiated in 2006 to meet the need for additional inpatient providers. Inpatient staffing challenges included decreased resident work hours as well as high inpatient volume during the winter respiratory season. The PNP hospitalist providers at CHCO independently manage care throughout hospitalization for patients within their scope of practice, and comanage more complex patients with the attending doctor of medicine (MD). The PNPs complete history and physical exams, order and interpret diagnostic tests, perform procedures, prescribe medications, and assist with discharge coordination. Patient populations within the PNP hospitalist scope of practice include uncomplicated bronchiolitis, pneumonia, and asthma.

The hospitalist section at CHCO's main campus includes 2 resident teams and 1 PNP team. The hospitalist section also provides inpatient care at several network of care (NOC) sites. These NOC sites are CHCO‐staffed facilities that are either freestanding or connected to a community hospital, with an emergency department and 6 to 8 inpatient beds. The PNP hospitalist role includes inpatient management at the CHCO main campus as well as in the NOC. The NOC sites are staffed with a PNP and MD team who work collaboratively to manage inpatient care. The Advanced Practice Hospitalist Program was implemented to improve staffing and maintain quality of patient care in a cost‐effective manner. We undertook a program evaluation with the goal of comparing quality and cost of care between the PNP team, PNP/MD team, and resident teams.

Administrative and electronic medical record data from July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. Data were obtained from inpatient records at CHCO inpatient medical unit and inpatient satellite sites in the CHCO NOC. The 2008 versions 26 and 27 of the 3M All Patient Refined Diagnosis‐Related Groups (APR‐DRG) were used to categorize patients by diagnosis, severity of illness, and risk of mortality.[10, 11] The top 3 APR‐DRGs at CHCO, based on volume of inpatient admissions, were selected for this analysis, including bronchiolitis and RSV pneumonia (APR‐DRG 138), pneumonia NEC (APR‐DRG 139), and asthma (APR‐DRG 141) (N = 1664). These 3 diagnoses accounted for approximately 60% of all inpatient hospitalist encounters and comprised 78% of the PNP encounters, 52% of the resident encounters, and 76% of the PNP/MD encounters. APR‐DRG severity of illness categories include I, II, III, and IV (minor, moderate, major, and extreme, respectively).[12] Severity of illness levels I and II were used for this analysis. Severity III and IV levels were excluded due to lack of patients in these categories on the PNP team and in the NOC. We also included observation status patients. The PNP team accounted for approximately 20% of the inpatient encounters, with 45% on the resident teams and 35% on the PNP/MD team in the NOC (Table 1).

Distribution of Patients on the PNP, PNP/MD, and ResidentTeams by APR‐DRG and Patient Type/Severity of Illness
Distribution of Patients Patient Type/Severity of Illness NP Resident PNP/MD
  • NOTE: N = 1664. Abbreviations: APR‐DRG, All Patient Refined Diagnosis‐Related Groups; MD, doctor of medicine; NP, nurse practitioner; PNP, pediatric nurse practitioner.

Bronchiolitis Observation 26 (23%) 32 (28%) 55 (49%)
Severity I 93 (29%) 77 (24%) 151 (47%)
Severity II 49 (24%) 95 (47%) 60 (29%)
Asthma Observation 7 (14%) 23 (45%) 21 (41%)
Severity I 48 (14%) 191 (57%) 97 (29%)
Severity II 19 (12%) 106 (66%) 35 (22%)
Pneumonia Observation 6 (22%) 12 (44%) 9 (34%)
Severity I 33 (17%) 68 (35%) 93 (48%)
Severity II 37 (14%) 152 (59%) 69 (27%)

The PNP hospitalist program was evaluated by comparing patient records from the PNP team, the PNP/MD team, and the resident teams. Evaluation measures included compliance with specific components of the bronchiolitis and asthma CCGs, LOS, and cost of care.

Outcomes Measured

Quality measures for this program evaluation included compliance with the bronchiolitis CCG recommendation to diagnose bronchiolitis based on history and exam findings while minimizing the use of chest x‐ray and respiratory viral testing.[13] Current evidence suggests that these tests add cost and exposure to radiation and do not necessarily predict severity of disease or change medical management.[14] This program evaluation also measured compliance with the asthma CCG recommendation to give every asthma patient an asthma action plan (AAP) prior to hospital discharge.[15] Of note, this evaluation was completed prior to more recent evidence that questions the utility of AAP for improving asthma clinical outcomes.[16] There were no related measures for pneumonia available because there was no CCG in place at the time of this evaluation.

Outcomes measures for this evaluation included LOS and cost of care for the top 3 inpatient diagnoses: bronchiolitis, asthma, and pneumonia. LOS for the inpatient hospitalization was measured in hours. Direct cost of care was used for this analysis, which included medical supplies, pharmacy, radiology, laboratory, and bed charges. Nursing charges were also included in the direct cost due to the proximity of nursing cost to the patient, versus more distant costs such as infrastructure or administration. Hospitalist physician and NP salaries were not included in direct cost analysis. Outcomes were compared for the PNP team, the resident teams, and the PN/MD team in the NOC.

Analysis

Patients were summarized by diagnosis‐related groups (APR‐DRG) and severity of illness using counts and percentages across the PNP team, resident teams, and the PNP/MD team in the NOC (Table 1). LOS and direct cost is skewed, therefore natural log transformations were used to meet normal assumption for statistical testing and modeling. Chi squared and t tests were performed to compare outcomes between the PNP and resident physician teams, stratified by APR‐DRG. Analysis of variance was used to analyze LOS and direct cost for the top 3 APR‐DRG admission codes while adjusting for acuity. The outcomes were also compared pairwise among the 3 teams using a linear mixed model to adjust for APR‐DRG and severity of illness, treating severity as a nested effect within the APR‐DRG. Bonferroni corrections were used to adjust for multiple comparisons; a P value <0.017 was considered statistically significant. Post hoc power analysis was completed for the analysis of bronchiolitis chest x‐ray ordering, even though the sample size was relatively large (PNP team 128, resident team 204) (Table 1). There was a 7% difference between the PNP and resident groups, and the power of detecting a significant difference was 40%. A sample size of 482 for each group would be necessary to achieve 80% power of detecting a 7% difference, while controlling for 5% type I error. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

RESULTS

PNP adherence to CCGs was comparable to resident teams for the specific measures used in this evaluation. Based on a hospital‐wide goal of ordering diagnostic tests for less than 25% of inpatients with bronchiolitis, there was no significant difference between the PNP team and resident teams. There was no significant difference in the rate of chest x‐ray ordering between the PNP team and the resident teams (15% vs 22%, P = 0.1079). Similarly, there was no significant difference in viral testing between the PNP and physician teams (24% vs 25%, P = 0.9813) (Table 2). Post hoc power analysis indicated that a larger sample size would be required to increase the power of detecting a statistically significant difference in chest x‐ray ordering between these groups. The PNP and resident teams were also compared using compliance with the asthma CCGs, specifically related to the goal of providing an accurate AAP to every patient admitted for asthma. The PNP and resident teams had a similar rate of compliance, with PNPs achieving 81% compliance and MDs 76% (P = 0.4351) (Table 2).

Adherence to Bronchiolitis and Asthma Clinical Care Guidelines by PNP and Resident Teams
Clinical Care Guidelines Diagnostic Test PNP Team Resident Teams P Value
  • NOTE: P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Abbreviations: PNP, pediatric nurse practitioner.

Bronchiolitis care Chest x‐ray 15% 22% 0.1079
Diagnostic testing Viral test 24% 25% 0.9813
Completed asthma action plans 81% 76% 0.4351

LOS and direct costs were compared for the 3 teams for the top 3 APR‐DRGs and controlling for acuity. Table 3 illustrates that there were no significant differences in LOS between the PNP and resident teams or between the PNP and PNP/MD teams for these 3 APR‐DRGs (P < 0.017 considered statistically significant). There was a statistically significant difference in LOS between resident and PNP/MD teams for asthma and pneumonia (P < 0.001). The direct cost of care per patient encounter provided by the PNP team was significantly less than the PNP/MD team for all 3 APR‐DRGs (P < 0.001). The direct cost of care per patient encounter provided by the PNP team was significantly less than the resident teams for asthma (P = 0.0021) and pneumonia (P = 0.0001), although the difference was not statistically significant for bronchiolitis (P = 0.0228) for level of significance P < 0.0017 (Table 3, 4).

Comparison by PNP, PNP/MD, and Resident Teams for Observation and Severity I and Severity II Patients by Direct Cost in Dollars and LOS in hours
PNP Resident PNP/MD P Value PNP vs Resident P Value

PNP vs PNP/MD

P Value Resident vs PNP/MD
  • NOTE: P < 0.017 is considered statistically significant. Abbreviations: LOS, length of stay; MD, doctor of medicine; PNP, pediatric nurse practitioner.

Cost
Bronchiolitis $2190 $2513 $3072 0.0228 <0.0001 0.0002
Asthma $2089 $2655 $3220 0.0021 <0.0001 0.0190
Pneumonia $2348 $3185 $3185 0.0001 <0.0001 0.1142
LOS, h
Bronchiolitis 52 52 51 0.9112 0.1600 0.1728
Asthma 36 42 48 0.0158 0.3151 <0.0001
Pneumonia 54 61 68 0.1136 0.1605 <0.0001
LOS Comparison to PHIS for Observation and Severity I and Severity II Patients by APR‐DRG and Team
PNP Resident PNP/MD PHIS Observation PHIS SeverityIII
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: APR‐DRG, All Patient Refined Diagnosis‐Related Groups; LOS, length of stay; MD, doctor of medicine; PHIS, Pediatric Health Information System, Children's Hospital Association[13]; PNP, pediatric nurse practitioner.

LOS, h
Bronchiolitis 52 52 51 43 70
Asthma 36 42 48 31 48
Pneumonia 54 61 68 46 64

Figure 1 illustrates the monthly patient census on the PNP and resident teams obtained from daily midnight census. There was a dramatic seasonal fluctuation in PNP team census, with a low census in July 2009 (22 patients) and high census in February 2010 (355 patients). The resident teams maintained a relatively stable census year round compared to the PNP team.

Figure 1
Pediatric nurse practitioner (PNP) and resident team census by month.

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSION

The results of this program evaluation suggest that the PNP team at CHCO provides inpatient care comparable to the resident teams at a lower cost per patient encounter for uncomplicated bronchiolitis, pneumonia, and asthma. The results of this program evaluation are consistent with previously published studies demonstrating that NPs improve outcomes such as decreased LOS and cost of care.[9]

In the setting of increasingly stringent restrictions in residency work hours, PNP hospitalists are a valuable resource for managing inpatient care. PNPs can provide additional benefits not explored in this program evaluation, such as increased access to care, increased patient and family satisfaction, improved documentation, and improved communication between nurses and physicians.[6] NP hospitalist providers can also decrease the patient care burden on housestaff, allowing teaching teams to focus on resident education.[6] This point could be made for the PNP team at CHCO, which contributed to care of inpatients during the peak respiratory season census. This strategy has allowed the resident teaching teams to maintain a more manageable patient census during the winter respiratory season, and presumably has allowed greater focus on resident education year round.[17]

Hospitals have been increasingly using evidence based CCGs as a strategy to improve patient outcomes and decrease LOS and cost.[18] CCGs provide an excellent tool for hospitalist physicians and APPs to deliver consistent inpatient care for common diagnoses such as bronchiolitis, asthma, and pneumonia. Increased reliance on CCGs has provided an opportunity to standardize evidence‐based practices and has allowed PNPs to expand their inpatient role at CHCO. The addition of a PNP inpatient team at CHCO also provided an effective strategy for management of seasonal fluctuations in inpatient census, particularly during the winter respiratory season.

Limitations

This is a single‐site program evaluation at a free standing children's hospital. Colorado law allows NPs to practice independently and obtain full prescriptive authority, although licensing and certification regulations for APPs vary from state to state. Our results may not be generalizable to other hospitals or to states where regulations differ. Patients admitted to the NOC sites and those assigned to the PNP team at the main campus are generally lower acuity and complexity compared to patients assigned to the resident teams at the main campus. Although we controlled for severity using the APR‐DRG severity classification, it is possible that our results were biased due to different patient profiles among the PNP and MD hospitalist teams. There were also potential limitations in the cost analysis, which included nursing in direct costs. Although nurse‐to‐patient ratios are comparable across hospitalist sites, the ratios may have varied due to fluctuations in patient census at each site. The CCG monitoring measures used in this evaluation also presented limitations. These measures were selected due to the availability of these data in the electronic medical record. Future studies may provide more clinically relevant information by including additional patient outcomes measures specifically related to inpatient medical management.

Despite the limitations in this program evaluation, we feel that these data add to the current knowledge in pediatrics by showing equipoise between these 2 groups. The PNP hospitalist role continues to evolve at CHCO, and the utility of this role must continue to be evaluated and reported.

Acknowledgements

Dashka Ranade provided Children's Hospital Colorado CCG comparison data for this program evaluation. David Bertoch provided LOS data from the Children's Hospital Association Pediatric Health Information System database.

Disclosures: Supported by NIH/NCATS Colorado CTSI grant number UL1 TR000154. The contents are the authors' sole responsibility and do not necessarily represent official NIH views.

Files
References
  1. Education ACfGM. Common Program Requirements. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 2011.
  2. Kleinpell RM, Hanson NA, Buchner BR, Winters R, Wilson MJ, Keck AC. Hospitalist services: an evolving opportunity. Nurse Pract. 2008;33(5):910.
  3. Steven K. APRN hospitalist: just a resident replacement? J Pediatr Health Care. 2004;18(4):208210.
  4. Borgmeyer A, Gyr PM, Jamerson PA, Henry LD. Evaluation of the role of the pediatric nurse practitioner in an inpatient asthma program. J Pediatr Health Care. 2008;22(5):273281.
  5. Rosenthal LD, Guerrasio J. Acute care nurse practitioner as hospitalist: role description. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2009;20(2):133136.
  6. Howie JN, Erickson M. Acute care nurse practitioners: creating and implementing a model of care for an inpatient general medical service. Am J Crit Care. 2002;11(5):448458.
  7. Fanta K, Cook B, Falcone RA, et al. Pediatric trauma nurse practitioners provide excellent care with superior patient satisfaction for injured children. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(1):277281.
  8. Shebesta K, Cook B, Rickets C, et al. Pediatric trauma nurse practitioners increase bedside nurses' satisfaction with pediatric trauma patient care. J Trauma Nurs. 2006;13(2):6669.
  9. Cowan MJ, Shapiro M, Hays RD, et al. The effect of a multidisciplinary hospitalist/physician and advanced practice nurse collaboration on hospital costs. J Nurs Adm. 2006;36(2):7985.
  10. Averill RF, Goldfield NI, Muldoon J, Steinbeck BA, Grant TM. A closer look at all‐patient refined DRGs. J AHIMA. 2002;73(1):4650.
  11. Muldoon JH. Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine. Pediatrics. 1999;103(1 suppl E):302318.
  12. Association CsH. Patient classification system, Children's Hospital Association. Available at: http://www.childrenshospitals.org/. Accessed January 4, 2014.
  13. Force BCT. Children's Hospital Colorado bronchiolitis clinical care guideline, Bronchiolitis CCG Task Force 2011. Available at: http://www.childrenscolorado.org/conditions/lung/healthcare_professionals/clinical_care_guidelines.aspx. Accessed January 4, 2014.
  14. American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Diagnosis and Management of Bronchiolitis. Diagnosis and management of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):17741793.
  15. Force AT.Children's Hospital Colorado asthma clinical care guideline, Asthma Task Force, 2011. Available at: http://www.childrenscolorado.org/conditions/lung/healthcare_professionals/clinical_care_guidelines.aspx. Accessed January 4, 2014.
  16. Bhogal S, Zemek R, Ducharme FM. Written action plans for asthma in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(3):CD005306.
  17. Hittle K, Tilford AK. Pediatric nurse practitioners as hospitalists. J Pediatr Health Care. 2010;24(5):347350.
  18. Lohr K, Eleazer K, Mauskopf J. Health policy issues and applications for evidence‐based medicine and clinical practice guidelines. Health Policy. 1998;46(1):119.
Article PDF
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 9(4)
Page Number
261-265
Sections
Files
Files
Article PDF
Article PDF

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education implemented rules limiting work hours for residents in 2003 and 2011, decreasing the availability of residents as providers at teaching hospitals.[1] These restrictions have increased reliance on advance practice providers (APPs) including nurse practitioners (NPs) and physicians' assistants in providing inpatient care. The NP hospitalist role includes inpatient medical management, coordination of care, patient and staff education, and quality improvement activities.[2] The NP hospitalist role has expanded beyond a replacement for reduced resident work hours, adding value through resident teaching, development of clinical care guidelines (CCGs), continuity of care, and familiarity with inpatient management.[3] The NP hospitalist role has been shown to improve the quality, efficiency, and cost effectiveness of inpatient care.[4, 5]

Favorable quality and cost measure results have been documented for adult NP hospitalists compared to housestaff, including improved patient outcomes, increased patient and staff satisfaction, decreased length of stay (LOS) and cost of care, and improved access to care.[6] These findings are supported by NP inpatient program evaluations at several academic medical centers, which also show increased patient and family satisfaction and improved communication between physicians, nurses, and families.[6, 7, 8] One study demonstrated that collaborative care management of adult medical patients by a hospitalist physician and advanced practice nurse led to decreased LOS and improved hospital profit without changing patient readmission or mortality.[9] Although there is a growing body of evidence supporting the quality and cost effectiveness of the NP hospitalist role in adult inpatient care, there are little published data for pediatric programs.

METHODS

The pediatric nurse practitioner (PNP) hospitalist role at Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO) was initiated in 2006 to meet the need for additional inpatient providers. Inpatient staffing challenges included decreased resident work hours as well as high inpatient volume during the winter respiratory season. The PNP hospitalist providers at CHCO independently manage care throughout hospitalization for patients within their scope of practice, and comanage more complex patients with the attending doctor of medicine (MD). The PNPs complete history and physical exams, order and interpret diagnostic tests, perform procedures, prescribe medications, and assist with discharge coordination. Patient populations within the PNP hospitalist scope of practice include uncomplicated bronchiolitis, pneumonia, and asthma.

The hospitalist section at CHCO's main campus includes 2 resident teams and 1 PNP team. The hospitalist section also provides inpatient care at several network of care (NOC) sites. These NOC sites are CHCO‐staffed facilities that are either freestanding or connected to a community hospital, with an emergency department and 6 to 8 inpatient beds. The PNP hospitalist role includes inpatient management at the CHCO main campus as well as in the NOC. The NOC sites are staffed with a PNP and MD team who work collaboratively to manage inpatient care. The Advanced Practice Hospitalist Program was implemented to improve staffing and maintain quality of patient care in a cost‐effective manner. We undertook a program evaluation with the goal of comparing quality and cost of care between the PNP team, PNP/MD team, and resident teams.

Administrative and electronic medical record data from July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. Data were obtained from inpatient records at CHCO inpatient medical unit and inpatient satellite sites in the CHCO NOC. The 2008 versions 26 and 27 of the 3M All Patient Refined Diagnosis‐Related Groups (APR‐DRG) were used to categorize patients by diagnosis, severity of illness, and risk of mortality.[10, 11] The top 3 APR‐DRGs at CHCO, based on volume of inpatient admissions, were selected for this analysis, including bronchiolitis and RSV pneumonia (APR‐DRG 138), pneumonia NEC (APR‐DRG 139), and asthma (APR‐DRG 141) (N = 1664). These 3 diagnoses accounted for approximately 60% of all inpatient hospitalist encounters and comprised 78% of the PNP encounters, 52% of the resident encounters, and 76% of the PNP/MD encounters. APR‐DRG severity of illness categories include I, II, III, and IV (minor, moderate, major, and extreme, respectively).[12] Severity of illness levels I and II were used for this analysis. Severity III and IV levels were excluded due to lack of patients in these categories on the PNP team and in the NOC. We also included observation status patients. The PNP team accounted for approximately 20% of the inpatient encounters, with 45% on the resident teams and 35% on the PNP/MD team in the NOC (Table 1).

Distribution of Patients on the PNP, PNP/MD, and ResidentTeams by APR‐DRG and Patient Type/Severity of Illness
Distribution of Patients Patient Type/Severity of Illness NP Resident PNP/MD
  • NOTE: N = 1664. Abbreviations: APR‐DRG, All Patient Refined Diagnosis‐Related Groups; MD, doctor of medicine; NP, nurse practitioner; PNP, pediatric nurse practitioner.

Bronchiolitis Observation 26 (23%) 32 (28%) 55 (49%)
Severity I 93 (29%) 77 (24%) 151 (47%)
Severity II 49 (24%) 95 (47%) 60 (29%)
Asthma Observation 7 (14%) 23 (45%) 21 (41%)
Severity I 48 (14%) 191 (57%) 97 (29%)
Severity II 19 (12%) 106 (66%) 35 (22%)
Pneumonia Observation 6 (22%) 12 (44%) 9 (34%)
Severity I 33 (17%) 68 (35%) 93 (48%)
Severity II 37 (14%) 152 (59%) 69 (27%)

The PNP hospitalist program was evaluated by comparing patient records from the PNP team, the PNP/MD team, and the resident teams. Evaluation measures included compliance with specific components of the bronchiolitis and asthma CCGs, LOS, and cost of care.

Outcomes Measured

Quality measures for this program evaluation included compliance with the bronchiolitis CCG recommendation to diagnose bronchiolitis based on history and exam findings while minimizing the use of chest x‐ray and respiratory viral testing.[13] Current evidence suggests that these tests add cost and exposure to radiation and do not necessarily predict severity of disease or change medical management.[14] This program evaluation also measured compliance with the asthma CCG recommendation to give every asthma patient an asthma action plan (AAP) prior to hospital discharge.[15] Of note, this evaluation was completed prior to more recent evidence that questions the utility of AAP for improving asthma clinical outcomes.[16] There were no related measures for pneumonia available because there was no CCG in place at the time of this evaluation.

Outcomes measures for this evaluation included LOS and cost of care for the top 3 inpatient diagnoses: bronchiolitis, asthma, and pneumonia. LOS for the inpatient hospitalization was measured in hours. Direct cost of care was used for this analysis, which included medical supplies, pharmacy, radiology, laboratory, and bed charges. Nursing charges were also included in the direct cost due to the proximity of nursing cost to the patient, versus more distant costs such as infrastructure or administration. Hospitalist physician and NP salaries were not included in direct cost analysis. Outcomes were compared for the PNP team, the resident teams, and the PN/MD team in the NOC.

Analysis

Patients were summarized by diagnosis‐related groups (APR‐DRG) and severity of illness using counts and percentages across the PNP team, resident teams, and the PNP/MD team in the NOC (Table 1). LOS and direct cost is skewed, therefore natural log transformations were used to meet normal assumption for statistical testing and modeling. Chi squared and t tests were performed to compare outcomes between the PNP and resident physician teams, stratified by APR‐DRG. Analysis of variance was used to analyze LOS and direct cost for the top 3 APR‐DRG admission codes while adjusting for acuity. The outcomes were also compared pairwise among the 3 teams using a linear mixed model to adjust for APR‐DRG and severity of illness, treating severity as a nested effect within the APR‐DRG. Bonferroni corrections were used to adjust for multiple comparisons; a P value <0.017 was considered statistically significant. Post hoc power analysis was completed for the analysis of bronchiolitis chest x‐ray ordering, even though the sample size was relatively large (PNP team 128, resident team 204) (Table 1). There was a 7% difference between the PNP and resident groups, and the power of detecting a significant difference was 40%. A sample size of 482 for each group would be necessary to achieve 80% power of detecting a 7% difference, while controlling for 5% type I error. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

RESULTS

PNP adherence to CCGs was comparable to resident teams for the specific measures used in this evaluation. Based on a hospital‐wide goal of ordering diagnostic tests for less than 25% of inpatients with bronchiolitis, there was no significant difference between the PNP team and resident teams. There was no significant difference in the rate of chest x‐ray ordering between the PNP team and the resident teams (15% vs 22%, P = 0.1079). Similarly, there was no significant difference in viral testing between the PNP and physician teams (24% vs 25%, P = 0.9813) (Table 2). Post hoc power analysis indicated that a larger sample size would be required to increase the power of detecting a statistically significant difference in chest x‐ray ordering between these groups. The PNP and resident teams were also compared using compliance with the asthma CCGs, specifically related to the goal of providing an accurate AAP to every patient admitted for asthma. The PNP and resident teams had a similar rate of compliance, with PNPs achieving 81% compliance and MDs 76% (P = 0.4351) (Table 2).

Adherence to Bronchiolitis and Asthma Clinical Care Guidelines by PNP and Resident Teams
Clinical Care Guidelines Diagnostic Test PNP Team Resident Teams P Value
  • NOTE: P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Abbreviations: PNP, pediatric nurse practitioner.

Bronchiolitis care Chest x‐ray 15% 22% 0.1079
Diagnostic testing Viral test 24% 25% 0.9813
Completed asthma action plans 81% 76% 0.4351

LOS and direct costs were compared for the 3 teams for the top 3 APR‐DRGs and controlling for acuity. Table 3 illustrates that there were no significant differences in LOS between the PNP and resident teams or between the PNP and PNP/MD teams for these 3 APR‐DRGs (P < 0.017 considered statistically significant). There was a statistically significant difference in LOS between resident and PNP/MD teams for asthma and pneumonia (P < 0.001). The direct cost of care per patient encounter provided by the PNP team was significantly less than the PNP/MD team for all 3 APR‐DRGs (P < 0.001). The direct cost of care per patient encounter provided by the PNP team was significantly less than the resident teams for asthma (P = 0.0021) and pneumonia (P = 0.0001), although the difference was not statistically significant for bronchiolitis (P = 0.0228) for level of significance P < 0.0017 (Table 3, 4).

Comparison by PNP, PNP/MD, and Resident Teams for Observation and Severity I and Severity II Patients by Direct Cost in Dollars and LOS in hours
PNP Resident PNP/MD P Value PNP vs Resident P Value

PNP vs PNP/MD

P Value Resident vs PNP/MD
  • NOTE: P < 0.017 is considered statistically significant. Abbreviations: LOS, length of stay; MD, doctor of medicine; PNP, pediatric nurse practitioner.

Cost
Bronchiolitis $2190 $2513 $3072 0.0228 <0.0001 0.0002
Asthma $2089 $2655 $3220 0.0021 <0.0001 0.0190
Pneumonia $2348 $3185 $3185 0.0001 <0.0001 0.1142
LOS, h
Bronchiolitis 52 52 51 0.9112 0.1600 0.1728
Asthma 36 42 48 0.0158 0.3151 <0.0001
Pneumonia 54 61 68 0.1136 0.1605 <0.0001
LOS Comparison to PHIS for Observation and Severity I and Severity II Patients by APR‐DRG and Team
PNP Resident PNP/MD PHIS Observation PHIS SeverityIII
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: APR‐DRG, All Patient Refined Diagnosis‐Related Groups; LOS, length of stay; MD, doctor of medicine; PHIS, Pediatric Health Information System, Children's Hospital Association[13]; PNP, pediatric nurse practitioner.

LOS, h
Bronchiolitis 52 52 51 43 70
Asthma 36 42 48 31 48
Pneumonia 54 61 68 46 64

Figure 1 illustrates the monthly patient census on the PNP and resident teams obtained from daily midnight census. There was a dramatic seasonal fluctuation in PNP team census, with a low census in July 2009 (22 patients) and high census in February 2010 (355 patients). The resident teams maintained a relatively stable census year round compared to the PNP team.

Figure 1
Pediatric nurse practitioner (PNP) and resident team census by month.

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSION

The results of this program evaluation suggest that the PNP team at CHCO provides inpatient care comparable to the resident teams at a lower cost per patient encounter for uncomplicated bronchiolitis, pneumonia, and asthma. The results of this program evaluation are consistent with previously published studies demonstrating that NPs improve outcomes such as decreased LOS and cost of care.[9]

In the setting of increasingly stringent restrictions in residency work hours, PNP hospitalists are a valuable resource for managing inpatient care. PNPs can provide additional benefits not explored in this program evaluation, such as increased access to care, increased patient and family satisfaction, improved documentation, and improved communication between nurses and physicians.[6] NP hospitalist providers can also decrease the patient care burden on housestaff, allowing teaching teams to focus on resident education.[6] This point could be made for the PNP team at CHCO, which contributed to care of inpatients during the peak respiratory season census. This strategy has allowed the resident teaching teams to maintain a more manageable patient census during the winter respiratory season, and presumably has allowed greater focus on resident education year round.[17]

Hospitals have been increasingly using evidence based CCGs as a strategy to improve patient outcomes and decrease LOS and cost.[18] CCGs provide an excellent tool for hospitalist physicians and APPs to deliver consistent inpatient care for common diagnoses such as bronchiolitis, asthma, and pneumonia. Increased reliance on CCGs has provided an opportunity to standardize evidence‐based practices and has allowed PNPs to expand their inpatient role at CHCO. The addition of a PNP inpatient team at CHCO also provided an effective strategy for management of seasonal fluctuations in inpatient census, particularly during the winter respiratory season.

Limitations

This is a single‐site program evaluation at a free standing children's hospital. Colorado law allows NPs to practice independently and obtain full prescriptive authority, although licensing and certification regulations for APPs vary from state to state. Our results may not be generalizable to other hospitals or to states where regulations differ. Patients admitted to the NOC sites and those assigned to the PNP team at the main campus are generally lower acuity and complexity compared to patients assigned to the resident teams at the main campus. Although we controlled for severity using the APR‐DRG severity classification, it is possible that our results were biased due to different patient profiles among the PNP and MD hospitalist teams. There were also potential limitations in the cost analysis, which included nursing in direct costs. Although nurse‐to‐patient ratios are comparable across hospitalist sites, the ratios may have varied due to fluctuations in patient census at each site. The CCG monitoring measures used in this evaluation also presented limitations. These measures were selected due to the availability of these data in the electronic medical record. Future studies may provide more clinically relevant information by including additional patient outcomes measures specifically related to inpatient medical management.

Despite the limitations in this program evaluation, we feel that these data add to the current knowledge in pediatrics by showing equipoise between these 2 groups. The PNP hospitalist role continues to evolve at CHCO, and the utility of this role must continue to be evaluated and reported.

Acknowledgements

Dashka Ranade provided Children's Hospital Colorado CCG comparison data for this program evaluation. David Bertoch provided LOS data from the Children's Hospital Association Pediatric Health Information System database.

Disclosures: Supported by NIH/NCATS Colorado CTSI grant number UL1 TR000154. The contents are the authors' sole responsibility and do not necessarily represent official NIH views.

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education implemented rules limiting work hours for residents in 2003 and 2011, decreasing the availability of residents as providers at teaching hospitals.[1] These restrictions have increased reliance on advance practice providers (APPs) including nurse practitioners (NPs) and physicians' assistants in providing inpatient care. The NP hospitalist role includes inpatient medical management, coordination of care, patient and staff education, and quality improvement activities.[2] The NP hospitalist role has expanded beyond a replacement for reduced resident work hours, adding value through resident teaching, development of clinical care guidelines (CCGs), continuity of care, and familiarity with inpatient management.[3] The NP hospitalist role has been shown to improve the quality, efficiency, and cost effectiveness of inpatient care.[4, 5]

Favorable quality and cost measure results have been documented for adult NP hospitalists compared to housestaff, including improved patient outcomes, increased patient and staff satisfaction, decreased length of stay (LOS) and cost of care, and improved access to care.[6] These findings are supported by NP inpatient program evaluations at several academic medical centers, which also show increased patient and family satisfaction and improved communication between physicians, nurses, and families.[6, 7, 8] One study demonstrated that collaborative care management of adult medical patients by a hospitalist physician and advanced practice nurse led to decreased LOS and improved hospital profit without changing patient readmission or mortality.[9] Although there is a growing body of evidence supporting the quality and cost effectiveness of the NP hospitalist role in adult inpatient care, there are little published data for pediatric programs.

METHODS

The pediatric nurse practitioner (PNP) hospitalist role at Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO) was initiated in 2006 to meet the need for additional inpatient providers. Inpatient staffing challenges included decreased resident work hours as well as high inpatient volume during the winter respiratory season. The PNP hospitalist providers at CHCO independently manage care throughout hospitalization for patients within their scope of practice, and comanage more complex patients with the attending doctor of medicine (MD). The PNPs complete history and physical exams, order and interpret diagnostic tests, perform procedures, prescribe medications, and assist with discharge coordination. Patient populations within the PNP hospitalist scope of practice include uncomplicated bronchiolitis, pneumonia, and asthma.

The hospitalist section at CHCO's main campus includes 2 resident teams and 1 PNP team. The hospitalist section also provides inpatient care at several network of care (NOC) sites. These NOC sites are CHCO‐staffed facilities that are either freestanding or connected to a community hospital, with an emergency department and 6 to 8 inpatient beds. The PNP hospitalist role includes inpatient management at the CHCO main campus as well as in the NOC. The NOC sites are staffed with a PNP and MD team who work collaboratively to manage inpatient care. The Advanced Practice Hospitalist Program was implemented to improve staffing and maintain quality of patient care in a cost‐effective manner. We undertook a program evaluation with the goal of comparing quality and cost of care between the PNP team, PNP/MD team, and resident teams.

Administrative and electronic medical record data from July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. Data were obtained from inpatient records at CHCO inpatient medical unit and inpatient satellite sites in the CHCO NOC. The 2008 versions 26 and 27 of the 3M All Patient Refined Diagnosis‐Related Groups (APR‐DRG) were used to categorize patients by diagnosis, severity of illness, and risk of mortality.[10, 11] The top 3 APR‐DRGs at CHCO, based on volume of inpatient admissions, were selected for this analysis, including bronchiolitis and RSV pneumonia (APR‐DRG 138), pneumonia NEC (APR‐DRG 139), and asthma (APR‐DRG 141) (N = 1664). These 3 diagnoses accounted for approximately 60% of all inpatient hospitalist encounters and comprised 78% of the PNP encounters, 52% of the resident encounters, and 76% of the PNP/MD encounters. APR‐DRG severity of illness categories include I, II, III, and IV (minor, moderate, major, and extreme, respectively).[12] Severity of illness levels I and II were used for this analysis. Severity III and IV levels were excluded due to lack of patients in these categories on the PNP team and in the NOC. We also included observation status patients. The PNP team accounted for approximately 20% of the inpatient encounters, with 45% on the resident teams and 35% on the PNP/MD team in the NOC (Table 1).

Distribution of Patients on the PNP, PNP/MD, and ResidentTeams by APR‐DRG and Patient Type/Severity of Illness
Distribution of Patients Patient Type/Severity of Illness NP Resident PNP/MD
  • NOTE: N = 1664. Abbreviations: APR‐DRG, All Patient Refined Diagnosis‐Related Groups; MD, doctor of medicine; NP, nurse practitioner; PNP, pediatric nurse practitioner.

Bronchiolitis Observation 26 (23%) 32 (28%) 55 (49%)
Severity I 93 (29%) 77 (24%) 151 (47%)
Severity II 49 (24%) 95 (47%) 60 (29%)
Asthma Observation 7 (14%) 23 (45%) 21 (41%)
Severity I 48 (14%) 191 (57%) 97 (29%)
Severity II 19 (12%) 106 (66%) 35 (22%)
Pneumonia Observation 6 (22%) 12 (44%) 9 (34%)
Severity I 33 (17%) 68 (35%) 93 (48%)
Severity II 37 (14%) 152 (59%) 69 (27%)

The PNP hospitalist program was evaluated by comparing patient records from the PNP team, the PNP/MD team, and the resident teams. Evaluation measures included compliance with specific components of the bronchiolitis and asthma CCGs, LOS, and cost of care.

Outcomes Measured

Quality measures for this program evaluation included compliance with the bronchiolitis CCG recommendation to diagnose bronchiolitis based on history and exam findings while minimizing the use of chest x‐ray and respiratory viral testing.[13] Current evidence suggests that these tests add cost and exposure to radiation and do not necessarily predict severity of disease or change medical management.[14] This program evaluation also measured compliance with the asthma CCG recommendation to give every asthma patient an asthma action plan (AAP) prior to hospital discharge.[15] Of note, this evaluation was completed prior to more recent evidence that questions the utility of AAP for improving asthma clinical outcomes.[16] There were no related measures for pneumonia available because there was no CCG in place at the time of this evaluation.

Outcomes measures for this evaluation included LOS and cost of care for the top 3 inpatient diagnoses: bronchiolitis, asthma, and pneumonia. LOS for the inpatient hospitalization was measured in hours. Direct cost of care was used for this analysis, which included medical supplies, pharmacy, radiology, laboratory, and bed charges. Nursing charges were also included in the direct cost due to the proximity of nursing cost to the patient, versus more distant costs such as infrastructure or administration. Hospitalist physician and NP salaries were not included in direct cost analysis. Outcomes were compared for the PNP team, the resident teams, and the PN/MD team in the NOC.

Analysis

Patients were summarized by diagnosis‐related groups (APR‐DRG) and severity of illness using counts and percentages across the PNP team, resident teams, and the PNP/MD team in the NOC (Table 1). LOS and direct cost is skewed, therefore natural log transformations were used to meet normal assumption for statistical testing and modeling. Chi squared and t tests were performed to compare outcomes between the PNP and resident physician teams, stratified by APR‐DRG. Analysis of variance was used to analyze LOS and direct cost for the top 3 APR‐DRG admission codes while adjusting for acuity. The outcomes were also compared pairwise among the 3 teams using a linear mixed model to adjust for APR‐DRG and severity of illness, treating severity as a nested effect within the APR‐DRG. Bonferroni corrections were used to adjust for multiple comparisons; a P value <0.017 was considered statistically significant. Post hoc power analysis was completed for the analysis of bronchiolitis chest x‐ray ordering, even though the sample size was relatively large (PNP team 128, resident team 204) (Table 1). There was a 7% difference between the PNP and resident groups, and the power of detecting a significant difference was 40%. A sample size of 482 for each group would be necessary to achieve 80% power of detecting a 7% difference, while controlling for 5% type I error. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

RESULTS

PNP adherence to CCGs was comparable to resident teams for the specific measures used in this evaluation. Based on a hospital‐wide goal of ordering diagnostic tests for less than 25% of inpatients with bronchiolitis, there was no significant difference between the PNP team and resident teams. There was no significant difference in the rate of chest x‐ray ordering between the PNP team and the resident teams (15% vs 22%, P = 0.1079). Similarly, there was no significant difference in viral testing between the PNP and physician teams (24% vs 25%, P = 0.9813) (Table 2). Post hoc power analysis indicated that a larger sample size would be required to increase the power of detecting a statistically significant difference in chest x‐ray ordering between these groups. The PNP and resident teams were also compared using compliance with the asthma CCGs, specifically related to the goal of providing an accurate AAP to every patient admitted for asthma. The PNP and resident teams had a similar rate of compliance, with PNPs achieving 81% compliance and MDs 76% (P = 0.4351) (Table 2).

Adherence to Bronchiolitis and Asthma Clinical Care Guidelines by PNP and Resident Teams
Clinical Care Guidelines Diagnostic Test PNP Team Resident Teams P Value
  • NOTE: P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Abbreviations: PNP, pediatric nurse practitioner.

Bronchiolitis care Chest x‐ray 15% 22% 0.1079
Diagnostic testing Viral test 24% 25% 0.9813
Completed asthma action plans 81% 76% 0.4351

LOS and direct costs were compared for the 3 teams for the top 3 APR‐DRGs and controlling for acuity. Table 3 illustrates that there were no significant differences in LOS between the PNP and resident teams or between the PNP and PNP/MD teams for these 3 APR‐DRGs (P < 0.017 considered statistically significant). There was a statistically significant difference in LOS between resident and PNP/MD teams for asthma and pneumonia (P < 0.001). The direct cost of care per patient encounter provided by the PNP team was significantly less than the PNP/MD team for all 3 APR‐DRGs (P < 0.001). The direct cost of care per patient encounter provided by the PNP team was significantly less than the resident teams for asthma (P = 0.0021) and pneumonia (P = 0.0001), although the difference was not statistically significant for bronchiolitis (P = 0.0228) for level of significance P < 0.0017 (Table 3, 4).

Comparison by PNP, PNP/MD, and Resident Teams for Observation and Severity I and Severity II Patients by Direct Cost in Dollars and LOS in hours
PNP Resident PNP/MD P Value PNP vs Resident P Value

PNP vs PNP/MD

P Value Resident vs PNP/MD
  • NOTE: P < 0.017 is considered statistically significant. Abbreviations: LOS, length of stay; MD, doctor of medicine; PNP, pediatric nurse practitioner.

Cost
Bronchiolitis $2190 $2513 $3072 0.0228 <0.0001 0.0002
Asthma $2089 $2655 $3220 0.0021 <0.0001 0.0190
Pneumonia $2348 $3185 $3185 0.0001 <0.0001 0.1142
LOS, h
Bronchiolitis 52 52 51 0.9112 0.1600 0.1728
Asthma 36 42 48 0.0158 0.3151 <0.0001
Pneumonia 54 61 68 0.1136 0.1605 <0.0001
LOS Comparison to PHIS for Observation and Severity I and Severity II Patients by APR‐DRG and Team
PNP Resident PNP/MD PHIS Observation PHIS SeverityIII
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: APR‐DRG, All Patient Refined Diagnosis‐Related Groups; LOS, length of stay; MD, doctor of medicine; PHIS, Pediatric Health Information System, Children's Hospital Association[13]; PNP, pediatric nurse practitioner.

LOS, h
Bronchiolitis 52 52 51 43 70
Asthma 36 42 48 31 48
Pneumonia 54 61 68 46 64

Figure 1 illustrates the monthly patient census on the PNP and resident teams obtained from daily midnight census. There was a dramatic seasonal fluctuation in PNP team census, with a low census in July 2009 (22 patients) and high census in February 2010 (355 patients). The resident teams maintained a relatively stable census year round compared to the PNP team.

Figure 1
Pediatric nurse practitioner (PNP) and resident team census by month.

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSION

The results of this program evaluation suggest that the PNP team at CHCO provides inpatient care comparable to the resident teams at a lower cost per patient encounter for uncomplicated bronchiolitis, pneumonia, and asthma. The results of this program evaluation are consistent with previously published studies demonstrating that NPs improve outcomes such as decreased LOS and cost of care.[9]

In the setting of increasingly stringent restrictions in residency work hours, PNP hospitalists are a valuable resource for managing inpatient care. PNPs can provide additional benefits not explored in this program evaluation, such as increased access to care, increased patient and family satisfaction, improved documentation, and improved communication between nurses and physicians.[6] NP hospitalist providers can also decrease the patient care burden on housestaff, allowing teaching teams to focus on resident education.[6] This point could be made for the PNP team at CHCO, which contributed to care of inpatients during the peak respiratory season census. This strategy has allowed the resident teaching teams to maintain a more manageable patient census during the winter respiratory season, and presumably has allowed greater focus on resident education year round.[17]

Hospitals have been increasingly using evidence based CCGs as a strategy to improve patient outcomes and decrease LOS and cost.[18] CCGs provide an excellent tool for hospitalist physicians and APPs to deliver consistent inpatient care for common diagnoses such as bronchiolitis, asthma, and pneumonia. Increased reliance on CCGs has provided an opportunity to standardize evidence‐based practices and has allowed PNPs to expand their inpatient role at CHCO. The addition of a PNP inpatient team at CHCO also provided an effective strategy for management of seasonal fluctuations in inpatient census, particularly during the winter respiratory season.

Limitations

This is a single‐site program evaluation at a free standing children's hospital. Colorado law allows NPs to practice independently and obtain full prescriptive authority, although licensing and certification regulations for APPs vary from state to state. Our results may not be generalizable to other hospitals or to states where regulations differ. Patients admitted to the NOC sites and those assigned to the PNP team at the main campus are generally lower acuity and complexity compared to patients assigned to the resident teams at the main campus. Although we controlled for severity using the APR‐DRG severity classification, it is possible that our results were biased due to different patient profiles among the PNP and MD hospitalist teams. There were also potential limitations in the cost analysis, which included nursing in direct costs. Although nurse‐to‐patient ratios are comparable across hospitalist sites, the ratios may have varied due to fluctuations in patient census at each site. The CCG monitoring measures used in this evaluation also presented limitations. These measures were selected due to the availability of these data in the electronic medical record. Future studies may provide more clinically relevant information by including additional patient outcomes measures specifically related to inpatient medical management.

Despite the limitations in this program evaluation, we feel that these data add to the current knowledge in pediatrics by showing equipoise between these 2 groups. The PNP hospitalist role continues to evolve at CHCO, and the utility of this role must continue to be evaluated and reported.

Acknowledgements

Dashka Ranade provided Children's Hospital Colorado CCG comparison data for this program evaluation. David Bertoch provided LOS data from the Children's Hospital Association Pediatric Health Information System database.

Disclosures: Supported by NIH/NCATS Colorado CTSI grant number UL1 TR000154. The contents are the authors' sole responsibility and do not necessarily represent official NIH views.

References
  1. Education ACfGM. Common Program Requirements. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 2011.
  2. Kleinpell RM, Hanson NA, Buchner BR, Winters R, Wilson MJ, Keck AC. Hospitalist services: an evolving opportunity. Nurse Pract. 2008;33(5):910.
  3. Steven K. APRN hospitalist: just a resident replacement? J Pediatr Health Care. 2004;18(4):208210.
  4. Borgmeyer A, Gyr PM, Jamerson PA, Henry LD. Evaluation of the role of the pediatric nurse practitioner in an inpatient asthma program. J Pediatr Health Care. 2008;22(5):273281.
  5. Rosenthal LD, Guerrasio J. Acute care nurse practitioner as hospitalist: role description. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2009;20(2):133136.
  6. Howie JN, Erickson M. Acute care nurse practitioners: creating and implementing a model of care for an inpatient general medical service. Am J Crit Care. 2002;11(5):448458.
  7. Fanta K, Cook B, Falcone RA, et al. Pediatric trauma nurse practitioners provide excellent care with superior patient satisfaction for injured children. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(1):277281.
  8. Shebesta K, Cook B, Rickets C, et al. Pediatric trauma nurse practitioners increase bedside nurses' satisfaction with pediatric trauma patient care. J Trauma Nurs. 2006;13(2):6669.
  9. Cowan MJ, Shapiro M, Hays RD, et al. The effect of a multidisciplinary hospitalist/physician and advanced practice nurse collaboration on hospital costs. J Nurs Adm. 2006;36(2):7985.
  10. Averill RF, Goldfield NI, Muldoon J, Steinbeck BA, Grant TM. A closer look at all‐patient refined DRGs. J AHIMA. 2002;73(1):4650.
  11. Muldoon JH. Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine. Pediatrics. 1999;103(1 suppl E):302318.
  12. Association CsH. Patient classification system, Children's Hospital Association. Available at: http://www.childrenshospitals.org/. Accessed January 4, 2014.
  13. Force BCT. Children's Hospital Colorado bronchiolitis clinical care guideline, Bronchiolitis CCG Task Force 2011. Available at: http://www.childrenscolorado.org/conditions/lung/healthcare_professionals/clinical_care_guidelines.aspx. Accessed January 4, 2014.
  14. American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Diagnosis and Management of Bronchiolitis. Diagnosis and management of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):17741793.
  15. Force AT.Children's Hospital Colorado asthma clinical care guideline, Asthma Task Force, 2011. Available at: http://www.childrenscolorado.org/conditions/lung/healthcare_professionals/clinical_care_guidelines.aspx. Accessed January 4, 2014.
  16. Bhogal S, Zemek R, Ducharme FM. Written action plans for asthma in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(3):CD005306.
  17. Hittle K, Tilford AK. Pediatric nurse practitioners as hospitalists. J Pediatr Health Care. 2010;24(5):347350.
  18. Lohr K, Eleazer K, Mauskopf J. Health policy issues and applications for evidence‐based medicine and clinical practice guidelines. Health Policy. 1998;46(1):119.
References
  1. Education ACfGM. Common Program Requirements. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 2011.
  2. Kleinpell RM, Hanson NA, Buchner BR, Winters R, Wilson MJ, Keck AC. Hospitalist services: an evolving opportunity. Nurse Pract. 2008;33(5):910.
  3. Steven K. APRN hospitalist: just a resident replacement? J Pediatr Health Care. 2004;18(4):208210.
  4. Borgmeyer A, Gyr PM, Jamerson PA, Henry LD. Evaluation of the role of the pediatric nurse practitioner in an inpatient asthma program. J Pediatr Health Care. 2008;22(5):273281.
  5. Rosenthal LD, Guerrasio J. Acute care nurse practitioner as hospitalist: role description. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2009;20(2):133136.
  6. Howie JN, Erickson M. Acute care nurse practitioners: creating and implementing a model of care for an inpatient general medical service. Am J Crit Care. 2002;11(5):448458.
  7. Fanta K, Cook B, Falcone RA, et al. Pediatric trauma nurse practitioners provide excellent care with superior patient satisfaction for injured children. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(1):277281.
  8. Shebesta K, Cook B, Rickets C, et al. Pediatric trauma nurse practitioners increase bedside nurses' satisfaction with pediatric trauma patient care. J Trauma Nurs. 2006;13(2):6669.
  9. Cowan MJ, Shapiro M, Hays RD, et al. The effect of a multidisciplinary hospitalist/physician and advanced practice nurse collaboration on hospital costs. J Nurs Adm. 2006;36(2):7985.
  10. Averill RF, Goldfield NI, Muldoon J, Steinbeck BA, Grant TM. A closer look at all‐patient refined DRGs. J AHIMA. 2002;73(1):4650.
  11. Muldoon JH. Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine. Pediatrics. 1999;103(1 suppl E):302318.
  12. Association CsH. Patient classification system, Children's Hospital Association. Available at: http://www.childrenshospitals.org/. Accessed January 4, 2014.
  13. Force BCT. Children's Hospital Colorado bronchiolitis clinical care guideline, Bronchiolitis CCG Task Force 2011. Available at: http://www.childrenscolorado.org/conditions/lung/healthcare_professionals/clinical_care_guidelines.aspx. Accessed January 4, 2014.
  14. American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Diagnosis and Management of Bronchiolitis. Diagnosis and management of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):17741793.
  15. Force AT.Children's Hospital Colorado asthma clinical care guideline, Asthma Task Force, 2011. Available at: http://www.childrenscolorado.org/conditions/lung/healthcare_professionals/clinical_care_guidelines.aspx. Accessed January 4, 2014.
  16. Bhogal S, Zemek R, Ducharme FM. Written action plans for asthma in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(3):CD005306.
  17. Hittle K, Tilford AK. Pediatric nurse practitioners as hospitalists. J Pediatr Health Care. 2010;24(5):347350.
  18. Lohr K, Eleazer K, Mauskopf J. Health policy issues and applications for evidence‐based medicine and clinical practice guidelines. Health Policy. 1998;46(1):119.
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 9(4)
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 9(4)
Page Number
261-265
Page Number
261-265
Article Type
Display Headline
The evolving role of the pediatric nurse practitioner in hospital medicine
Display Headline
The evolving role of the pediatric nurse practitioner in hospital medicine
Sections
Article Source
© 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine
Disallow All Ads
Correspondence Location
Address for correspondence and reprint requests: Stacey Wall, MS, CPNP, Children's Hospital Colorado, 13123 E. 16th Avenue, Box 302, Aurora, CO 80045; Telephone: 720‐777‐5070; Fax: 720‐777‐7259; E‐mail: [email protected]
Content Gating
Gated (full article locked unless allowed per User)
Gating Strategy
First Peek Free
Article PDF Media
Media Files

Bridging the Inpatient–Outpatient Divide

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/02/2017 - 19:34
Display Headline
Changing chronic medications in hospitalized patients—Bridging the inpatient–outpatient divide

There is consensus that the hospital is an appropriate place to start chronic medications for conditions that caused the hospitalization (e.g., aspirin for a patient admitted with acute myocardial infarction). However, little is known about physician attitudes toward starting chronic medications for conditions unrelated to the reason for hospitalization (e.g., aspirin in a patient with a history of myocardial infarction admitted for cellulitis). Although hospitalists can identify and remedy potential gaps in the management of chronic conditions, changes in such medications during the hospital stay can create a number of problems. Contextual factors, such as prior medication trials, patient preferences, and longstanding patterns of disease management, may be unknown to the inpatient clinician, and medication confusion, nonadherence, and adverse effects can result from multiple medication changes.[1, 2] The lack of consensus about changing chronic medications for conditions unrelated to the reason for admission reflects a lack of clarity regarding the risk‐benefit equation in this area.

The study by Breu and colleagues[3] in this issue provides one of the first studies of hospitalist and primary care physician (PCP) attitudes about changing chronic medications during hospitalization for conditions unrelated to the reason for admission. The authors had hospitalists and PCPs consider six cases, half involving a medication change related to the reason for admission and half involving a medication change unrelated to the reason for admission. They found that PCPs were more likely than hospitalists to feel that inpatient interventions were appropriate when unrelated to the reason for admission. However, the majority of both hospitalists and PCPs did not feel interventions in these cases were appropriate.

Although this study provides useful insight into the attitudes of physicians toward these issues, it is likely that even more physicians would be skeptical of initiating chronic medications in the hospital if the scenarios reflected the messy reality that often faces clinicians when patients are hospitalized. The study asked physician respondents to assume full outpatient electronic medical record (EMR) access and communication at discharge. However, in practice, inpatient physicians often do not have full outpatient EMR access. If they do have full access to records, they typically do not have the time to thoroughly review the chart, leading to over half of internal medicine patients having at least one medication discrepancy at admission.[4] In addition, communication between hospitalists and PCPs occurs infrequently, and discharge summaries are often not available by the time of the first postdischarge clinic visit and lack important information, such as diagnostic test results and discharge medications.[2]

We believe that in most clinical settings, the serious problems that accompany changing medications in hospitalized patients argue for a judicious approach to modifying medications for chronic conditions not related to the reason for hospitalization. However, the more important question is how the prescribing process in hospitalized patients can be re‐envisioned in a manner that allows individualization of these decisions to serve both the short‐ and long‐term needs of patients. Because the success and appropriateness of long‐term treatment decisions often depends on contextual factors, PCP follow‐up, and patient medication compliance, in most cases decisions about initiating long‐term therapy for conditions not central to the hospital admission should involve each of these circumstances. Shared decision making models involve clinicians and patients sharing information, expressing treatment preferences, deliberating the options, and coming to an agreement on a treatment plan,[5] and these models have been associated with improved adherence and disease‐specific outcomes.[6] Shared decision making in many cases could be done quickly and efficiently through a quick check‐in with the PCP and a brief discussion with the patient. When consensus cannot be reached with these methods, then raising the issue with the PCP and patient but deferring the final decision until after discharge would be appropriate.

In hospitalized patients, less is often more, and minimizing the number of nonessential medication changes may ultimately yield better outcomes. Although inpatient clinicians can identify important gaps in care, the best solutions come from discussions that can bridge the inpatient‐outpatient divide and ultimately serve the long‐term needs of patients.

Disclosures

The authors are supported by the National Institutes of Health and the American Federation for Aging Research (1K23‐AG030999) and the Department of Veterans Affairs Quality Scholars Program.

References
  1. Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. Adverse drug events occurring following hospital discharge. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:317323.
  2. Kripalani S, Jackson AT, Schnipper JL, Coleman EA. Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: a review of key issues for hospitalists. J Hospital Med. 2007;2:314323.
  3. Breu A, Mueller S, Palamara K, Hinami K, Herzig SJ. Hospitalist and primary care physician perspectives on medication management of chronic conditions for hospitalized patients. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(5):303309.
  4. Unroe KT, Pfeiffenberger T, Riegelhaupt S, Jastrzembski J, Lokhnygina Y, Colon‐Emeric C. Inpatient medication reconciliation at admission and discharge: a retrospective cohort study of age and other risk factors for medication discrepancies. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010;8:115126.
  5. Stevenson FA, Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP. Doctor‐patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:829840.
  6. Wilson SR, Strub P, Buist AS, et al. Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:566577.
Article PDF
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 9(5)
Page Number
332-333
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF

There is consensus that the hospital is an appropriate place to start chronic medications for conditions that caused the hospitalization (e.g., aspirin for a patient admitted with acute myocardial infarction). However, little is known about physician attitudes toward starting chronic medications for conditions unrelated to the reason for hospitalization (e.g., aspirin in a patient with a history of myocardial infarction admitted for cellulitis). Although hospitalists can identify and remedy potential gaps in the management of chronic conditions, changes in such medications during the hospital stay can create a number of problems. Contextual factors, such as prior medication trials, patient preferences, and longstanding patterns of disease management, may be unknown to the inpatient clinician, and medication confusion, nonadherence, and adverse effects can result from multiple medication changes.[1, 2] The lack of consensus about changing chronic medications for conditions unrelated to the reason for admission reflects a lack of clarity regarding the risk‐benefit equation in this area.

The study by Breu and colleagues[3] in this issue provides one of the first studies of hospitalist and primary care physician (PCP) attitudes about changing chronic medications during hospitalization for conditions unrelated to the reason for admission. The authors had hospitalists and PCPs consider six cases, half involving a medication change related to the reason for admission and half involving a medication change unrelated to the reason for admission. They found that PCPs were more likely than hospitalists to feel that inpatient interventions were appropriate when unrelated to the reason for admission. However, the majority of both hospitalists and PCPs did not feel interventions in these cases were appropriate.

Although this study provides useful insight into the attitudes of physicians toward these issues, it is likely that even more physicians would be skeptical of initiating chronic medications in the hospital if the scenarios reflected the messy reality that often faces clinicians when patients are hospitalized. The study asked physician respondents to assume full outpatient electronic medical record (EMR) access and communication at discharge. However, in practice, inpatient physicians often do not have full outpatient EMR access. If they do have full access to records, they typically do not have the time to thoroughly review the chart, leading to over half of internal medicine patients having at least one medication discrepancy at admission.[4] In addition, communication between hospitalists and PCPs occurs infrequently, and discharge summaries are often not available by the time of the first postdischarge clinic visit and lack important information, such as diagnostic test results and discharge medications.[2]

We believe that in most clinical settings, the serious problems that accompany changing medications in hospitalized patients argue for a judicious approach to modifying medications for chronic conditions not related to the reason for hospitalization. However, the more important question is how the prescribing process in hospitalized patients can be re‐envisioned in a manner that allows individualization of these decisions to serve both the short‐ and long‐term needs of patients. Because the success and appropriateness of long‐term treatment decisions often depends on contextual factors, PCP follow‐up, and patient medication compliance, in most cases decisions about initiating long‐term therapy for conditions not central to the hospital admission should involve each of these circumstances. Shared decision making models involve clinicians and patients sharing information, expressing treatment preferences, deliberating the options, and coming to an agreement on a treatment plan,[5] and these models have been associated with improved adherence and disease‐specific outcomes.[6] Shared decision making in many cases could be done quickly and efficiently through a quick check‐in with the PCP and a brief discussion with the patient. When consensus cannot be reached with these methods, then raising the issue with the PCP and patient but deferring the final decision until after discharge would be appropriate.

In hospitalized patients, less is often more, and minimizing the number of nonessential medication changes may ultimately yield better outcomes. Although inpatient clinicians can identify important gaps in care, the best solutions come from discussions that can bridge the inpatient‐outpatient divide and ultimately serve the long‐term needs of patients.

Disclosures

The authors are supported by the National Institutes of Health and the American Federation for Aging Research (1K23‐AG030999) and the Department of Veterans Affairs Quality Scholars Program.

There is consensus that the hospital is an appropriate place to start chronic medications for conditions that caused the hospitalization (e.g., aspirin for a patient admitted with acute myocardial infarction). However, little is known about physician attitudes toward starting chronic medications for conditions unrelated to the reason for hospitalization (e.g., aspirin in a patient with a history of myocardial infarction admitted for cellulitis). Although hospitalists can identify and remedy potential gaps in the management of chronic conditions, changes in such medications during the hospital stay can create a number of problems. Contextual factors, such as prior medication trials, patient preferences, and longstanding patterns of disease management, may be unknown to the inpatient clinician, and medication confusion, nonadherence, and adverse effects can result from multiple medication changes.[1, 2] The lack of consensus about changing chronic medications for conditions unrelated to the reason for admission reflects a lack of clarity regarding the risk‐benefit equation in this area.

The study by Breu and colleagues[3] in this issue provides one of the first studies of hospitalist and primary care physician (PCP) attitudes about changing chronic medications during hospitalization for conditions unrelated to the reason for admission. The authors had hospitalists and PCPs consider six cases, half involving a medication change related to the reason for admission and half involving a medication change unrelated to the reason for admission. They found that PCPs were more likely than hospitalists to feel that inpatient interventions were appropriate when unrelated to the reason for admission. However, the majority of both hospitalists and PCPs did not feel interventions in these cases were appropriate.

Although this study provides useful insight into the attitudes of physicians toward these issues, it is likely that even more physicians would be skeptical of initiating chronic medications in the hospital if the scenarios reflected the messy reality that often faces clinicians when patients are hospitalized. The study asked physician respondents to assume full outpatient electronic medical record (EMR) access and communication at discharge. However, in practice, inpatient physicians often do not have full outpatient EMR access. If they do have full access to records, they typically do not have the time to thoroughly review the chart, leading to over half of internal medicine patients having at least one medication discrepancy at admission.[4] In addition, communication between hospitalists and PCPs occurs infrequently, and discharge summaries are often not available by the time of the first postdischarge clinic visit and lack important information, such as diagnostic test results and discharge medications.[2]

We believe that in most clinical settings, the serious problems that accompany changing medications in hospitalized patients argue for a judicious approach to modifying medications for chronic conditions not related to the reason for hospitalization. However, the more important question is how the prescribing process in hospitalized patients can be re‐envisioned in a manner that allows individualization of these decisions to serve both the short‐ and long‐term needs of patients. Because the success and appropriateness of long‐term treatment decisions often depends on contextual factors, PCP follow‐up, and patient medication compliance, in most cases decisions about initiating long‐term therapy for conditions not central to the hospital admission should involve each of these circumstances. Shared decision making models involve clinicians and patients sharing information, expressing treatment preferences, deliberating the options, and coming to an agreement on a treatment plan,[5] and these models have been associated with improved adherence and disease‐specific outcomes.[6] Shared decision making in many cases could be done quickly and efficiently through a quick check‐in with the PCP and a brief discussion with the patient. When consensus cannot be reached with these methods, then raising the issue with the PCP and patient but deferring the final decision until after discharge would be appropriate.

In hospitalized patients, less is often more, and minimizing the number of nonessential medication changes may ultimately yield better outcomes. Although inpatient clinicians can identify important gaps in care, the best solutions come from discussions that can bridge the inpatient‐outpatient divide and ultimately serve the long‐term needs of patients.

Disclosures

The authors are supported by the National Institutes of Health and the American Federation for Aging Research (1K23‐AG030999) and the Department of Veterans Affairs Quality Scholars Program.

References
  1. Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. Adverse drug events occurring following hospital discharge. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:317323.
  2. Kripalani S, Jackson AT, Schnipper JL, Coleman EA. Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: a review of key issues for hospitalists. J Hospital Med. 2007;2:314323.
  3. Breu A, Mueller S, Palamara K, Hinami K, Herzig SJ. Hospitalist and primary care physician perspectives on medication management of chronic conditions for hospitalized patients. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(5):303309.
  4. Unroe KT, Pfeiffenberger T, Riegelhaupt S, Jastrzembski J, Lokhnygina Y, Colon‐Emeric C. Inpatient medication reconciliation at admission and discharge: a retrospective cohort study of age and other risk factors for medication discrepancies. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010;8:115126.
  5. Stevenson FA, Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP. Doctor‐patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:829840.
  6. Wilson SR, Strub P, Buist AS, et al. Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:566577.
References
  1. Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. Adverse drug events occurring following hospital discharge. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:317323.
  2. Kripalani S, Jackson AT, Schnipper JL, Coleman EA. Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: a review of key issues for hospitalists. J Hospital Med. 2007;2:314323.
  3. Breu A, Mueller S, Palamara K, Hinami K, Herzig SJ. Hospitalist and primary care physician perspectives on medication management of chronic conditions for hospitalized patients. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(5):303309.
  4. Unroe KT, Pfeiffenberger T, Riegelhaupt S, Jastrzembski J, Lokhnygina Y, Colon‐Emeric C. Inpatient medication reconciliation at admission and discharge: a retrospective cohort study of age and other risk factors for medication discrepancies. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010;8:115126.
  5. Stevenson FA, Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP. Doctor‐patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:829840.
  6. Wilson SR, Strub P, Buist AS, et al. Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:566577.
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 9(5)
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 9(5)
Page Number
332-333
Page Number
332-333
Article Type
Display Headline
Changing chronic medications in hospitalized patients—Bridging the inpatient–outpatient divide
Display Headline
Changing chronic medications in hospitalized patients—Bridging the inpatient–outpatient divide
Sections
Article Source
Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA
Disallow All Ads
Correspondence Location
Address for correspondence and reprint requests: Jessica A. Eng, MD, San Francisco VA Medical Center, 4150 Clement St., 181G, San Francisco, CA 94121; Telephone: 415‐221‐4810; Fax: 415‐750‐6641; E‐mail: [email protected]
Content Gating
Gated (full article locked unless allowed per User)
Gating Strategy
First Peek Free
Article PDF Media