User login
Pregnant Woman, 39, With Hypertension and New-Onset Proteinuria
A 39-year-old black woman, gravida 1, para 0, with an intrauterine pregnancy of 34 weeks and three days (according to last menstrual period and nine-week ultrasound) presented to her Ob-Gyn office for a routine prenatal visit. She was found to have an elevated blood pressure with new onset of 2+ proteinuria. The patient was sent to the labor and delivery unit at the adjoining hospital for serial blood pressure readings, laboratory work, and fetal monitoring.
The patient’s previous medical history was limited to sinusitis. She was taking no prescription medications, and her only listed allergy was to pineapple. Initial lab studies revealed elevations in liver enzymes, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), uric acid, and serum creatinine, as well as thrombocytopenia (see Table 11-5). She also had a critically low blood glucose level, which conflicted with a normal follow-up reading.
At this point, the patient was thought to have HELLP syndrome6 (ie, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count), or possibly acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP).2,4,7-11 Additional labs were drawn immediately to confirm or rule out AFLP. These included repeat serum glucose (following a second reading with normal results), a serum ammonia level, prothrombin time (PT), and partial thromboplastin time (PTT). The most reliable values to distinguish AFLP from HELLP are profound hypoglycemia (found in 94% of women with AFLP12) and an elevated serum ammonia level.4
Given the serious nature of either diagnosis, immediate delivery of the infant was deemed necessary. Because the patient’s cervix was not found favorable for induction, she underwent low-transverse cesarean delivery without complications. She was noted to have essentially normal anatomy with the exception of a small subserosal fibroid posteriorly. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid was present. A male infant was delivered, weighing 5 lb with 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores of 8 and 9, respectively.
Postoperatively, the patient remained in the recovery area, where she received intensive monitoring. She experienced fluctuations in blood glucose, ranging from 33 to 144 mg/dL; she was started on 5% dextrose in lactated Ringer’s solution and treated with IV dextrose 50 g. While the patient was in surgical recovery, results from the second set of labs, drawn before surgery, were returned; findings included an elevated ammonia level and an abnormal coagulation panel, including PT of 25.3 sec, PTT of 48.4 sec, and a fibrinogen level of 116 mg/dL, confirming the suspected diagnosis of AFLP.
Magnesium sulfate, which had been started immediately postop, was discontinued on confirmation of the diagnosis of AFLP. The patient was initially somnolent as a result of general anesthesia but gradually returned to a fully normal sensorium by early morning on postop day 1. Postoperatively, the patient’s hemoglobin was found to be low (8.6 g/dL; reference range, 13.5 to 18.5 g/dL), so she was transfused with two units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) and given fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to correct this coagulopathy. The patient’s platelets were also low at 82,000/mm3 (reference range, 140,000 to 340,000/mm3).
On postop day 1, the patient’s serum creatinine rose to 4.2 mg/dL and her total bilirubin increased to 14.4 mg/dL (reference ranges, 0.6 to 1.2 mg/dL and < 1.0 mg/dL, respectively). Given the multiple systems affected by AFLP and the need for intensive supportive care, the patient was transferred to the ICU.
On her arrival at the ICU, the patient’s vital signs were initially stable, and she was alert and oriented. However, within the next few hours, she became hypotensive and encephalopathic. She required aggressive fluid resuscitation and multiple transfusions of PRBCs and FFP due to persistent anemia and coagulopathy. Her vital signs were stabilized, but she continued to need blood transfusions.
Postop day 2, the patient became less responsive and was soon unable to follow commands or speak clearly. Her breathing remained stable with just 3 L of oxygen by nasal cannula, but in order to prevent aspiration and in consideration of a postoperative ileus, it was necessary to place a nasogastric tube with low intermittent suction. This produced a bloody return, but no intervention other than close monitoring and transfusion was performed at that time.
Abdominal ultrasound showed ascites and mild left-sided hydronephrosis with no gallstones. The common bile duct measured 3 mm in diameter.
Although liver biopsy is considered the gold standard for a confirmed diagnosis of AFLP,13,14 this procedure was contraindicated by the patient’s coagulopathy. Concern was also expressed by one consultant that the patient might have thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) in addition to AFLP. TTP can manifest with similar findings, such as anemia, thrombocytopenia, neurologic symptoms, and renal abnormalities, but usually fever is involved, and the patient was afebrile. A catheter was placed for hemodialysis and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). Given that TTP-associated mortality is significantly decreased by use of TPE,15 this intervention was deemed prudent. The patient underwent TPE on three consecutive days, postop days 2 through 4.
The patient’s mental status began to improve, and by postop day 6, she was able to follow commands and engage in brief conversations. By postop day 9, she had returned almost completely to her baseline mental status.
The patient’s liver function test results and total bilirubin, ammonia, and creatinine levels all improved over the first few postoperative days but began to rise again by day 6. In response to worsening renal and hepatic functioning, the decision was made on postop day 9 to transfer the patient to a hospital with liver transplantation capabilities, should this procedure become necessary.
Discussion
AFLP is a rare condition specific to pregnancy, affecting 1/7,000 to 1/20,000 pregnancies. Due to the low incidence of this disease, randomized controlled trials to study it are not possible. Instead, clinicians must learn either from individual case studies or from retrospective syntheses of cases reported over time.1,2,7 Fortunately, the wealth of information gleaned over the past 30 years has significantly reduced AFLP-associated maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity rates. In the 1980s, maternal and fetal mortality rates as high as 85% were reported.3 Worldwide, maternal mortality associated with AFLP has decreased significantly to 7% to 18%, whereas the fetal mortality rate has fallen to between 9% and 23%.1,16,17
Common trends among women who have developed AFLP include nulliparity, multiparity, and advanced maternal age. One retrospective study of 57 women who had developed AFLP revealed that 35 cases (61%) involved first-time pregnancies. It also showed that 10 (18%) of the women had twins, and 14 (25%) were older than 35.2 In another study of 35 cases of AFLP, 40% of the women were nulliparous, and 11.4% were multiparous, including one triplet gestation.12 In a third, smaller study, 80% of women affected by AFLP were multiparous.10 Currently, there is no known evidence linking any maternal behavior to development of AFLP.
Presentation
Women who present with AFLP often experience vague, nonspecific symptoms, leading to misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. Objective measurements, including physical exam findings, laboratory studies, and other diagnostic tests, will help with a diagnosis. The most frequent initial symptoms are nausea and vomiting (in 70% of patients) and abdominal pain (50% to 80%), epigastric or right upper-quadrant.3 Other common symptoms include fatigue, malaise, anorexia, weight gain, polyuria, and polydipsia.2,3,9,18,19
Because the presenting symptoms in AFLP can be vague, clinicians should complete a thorough physical exam to differentiate accurately among conditions associated with pregnancy. Physical signs present in women with AFLP can include jaundice, ascites, edema, confusion, abdominal tenderness, and fever. More severe cases can present with multisystem involvement, including acute renal failure, gastrointestinal bleeding, pancreatitis, coagulopathy, and hepatic encephalopathy.3,4,9,18
Diagnostic Tests
Relevant laboratory tests include a complete blood count (CBC), liver studies, chemistry, coagulation studies, and urinalysis (see Table 1). Viral causes should be ruled out by way of a hepatitis panel.3 In AFLP, the CBC may show elevated white blood cells, decreased hemoglobin and hematocrit, and decreased platelets. Liver studies show elevated hepatic aminotransferase, bilirubin, LDH, and ammonia levels. Chemistry results show elevated blood urea nitrogen and creatinine, and decreased blood glucose. Coagulation factors are affected, and prolonged PTT, decreased fibrinogen, and proteinurea may also be found.9
Though invasive and not often necessary4,13 (and not possible for the case patient), the definitive diagnostic test for AFLP is liver biopsy.13,14 Biopsy reveals a microvesicular fatty infiltration of the hepatocytes as minute fat droplets surrounding a centrally located nucleus. These fatty infiltrates stain with oil red O, specific for fat. Inflammation is present in 50% of cases. There may also be a picture similar to cholestasis with bile thrombi or deposits within the hepatocytes.20
Due to the risk for hemorrhage and the critical status of women with AFLP, biopsy is often not possible. Ultrasonography may show increased echogenicity; CT may show decreased or diffuse attenuation in the liver. These imaging studies, though possibly helpful in severe cases, often yield false-negative results.3,20
In the absence of another explanation for the patient’s symptoms, the Swansea criteria are used for diagnosis of AFLP.1 Six or more of the following criteria must be present to confirm this diagnosis: vomiting, abdominal pain, polydipsia or polyuria, encephalopathy, leukocytosis, elevated bilirubin, elevated liver enzymes, elevated ammonia, hypoglycemia, renal dysfunction, coagulopathy, elevated uric acid, ascites on ultrasound, and microvesicular steatosis on liver biopsy.1,2,5
Pathophysiology
Normal functions of the liver include metabolism, protein synthesis, and manufacturing of blood coagulation proteins. These functions are disturbed in the presence of AFLP. Thus, women with this disease experience signs and symptoms related directly to the dysfunction of these processes.20-22
Disturbances in the hepatocytes due to excess fatty acids impair the liver’s ability to convert unconjugated bilirubin into conjugated bilirubin, causing plasma levels of unconjugated bilirubin to rise. This increase in bilirubin explains the jaundiced appearance of women with AFLP. AFLP is often thought to occur in conjunction with preeclampsia in many, but not all, patients. Thrombocytopenia in these patients is felt to be secondary to peripheral vascular consumption. Conjugated bilirubin levels may also be increased due to decreased flow of conjugated bilirubin into the common bile duct.21
Another liver function that is disrupted is that of glycogen storage and conversion to glucose, and the liver’s ability to convert nutrients into glycogen is also impaired. Decreased storage of glycogen, along with the liver’s inability to break down previously stored glycogen, causes a decrease in serum glucose levels. Women with AFLP often require treatment with IV dextrose in response to marked hypoglycemia.16,21,23
The liver dysfunction associated with AFLP reduces adequate production of clotting factors and coagulation proteins. Thrombocytopenia, elevated clotting times, and bleeding are all problems seen in AFLP. Mild to moderate elevations in serum aminotransferases and elevated LDH also occur in patients with AFLP.23,24
Genetic Factor
There is little known about the etiology of AFLP, although recent data point to a genetic component that was found in as many as 62% of mothers in one study and in 25% of infants in another study.20-22 Fatty acid oxidation (FAO) is one of the processes of hepatic mitochondria, a process that relies on several enzymes. When FAO is interrupted, fatty acids are deposited in the liver cells, as seen in histologic studies of AFLP.25,26 The common thread in women with this disease is a mutation in one of the enzymes needed for FAO. This enzyme is the long-chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase. Deficiencies in this enzyme are common in mothers with AFLP and their infants.3,16,20,23,27
Differential Diagnosis
Several complications of pregnancy that involve the liver may, on presentation, mimic AFLP.16,20,23,24,28 The most common are hyperemesis gravidarum and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy23 (see Table 216,20,23,24,28); others are preeclampsia/eclampsia and HELLP syndrome. It is important to distinguish between the signs and symptoms associated with each of these disorders in order to provide the most effective treatment. Hepatitis serologies are important in the differential diagnosis when liver enzyme levels are exceptionally high.4,16,22,28
Treatment
The most effective treatment for AFLP is delivery of the infant; often, this alone causes the signs and symptoms of AFLP to resolve.8,21,27,29 In two of three cases in a small study by Aso et al,8 early delivery of the fetus led to complete resolution of symptoms and return to normal liver function. One of these patients was sent home four days after delivery; the other, 14 days later. Other patients may require more invasive treatment and support.8
Management in the ICU is often required to provide appropriate supportive care to the mother after delivery. Acute respiratory distress syndrome, pancreatitis, hemorrhage, encephalopathy, renal failure, and continual liver failure are among the severe complications associated with AFLP.4,8,10 Many women require intubation, dialysis, fluid resuscitation, blood product transfusion, and vasopressor therapy.3,8,11 Prophylactic antibiotics, IV steroids, and glucose may all be required in the supportive care and recovery of a mother with AFLP.3,8,11
TPE has also been useful in instances of severe complications.1,3,6 In one retrospective study, Martin et al1 recommended administration of TPE in patients with AFLP under the following circumstances:
(1) Deteriorating central nervous system abnormalities, such as sensorium changes or coma;
(2) Persistent coagulopathy requiring continued and aggressive blood product support with plasma, red cells, and/or cryoprecipitate;
(3) Advanced renal dysfunction that compromised fluid management;
(4) Progressive cardiopulmonary compromise; and/or
(5) Ongoing fluid management concerns, including significant ascites, edema, anuria/oliguria, and/or fluid overload.1
In rare cases, liver transplantation is needed in patients with AFLP. Westbrook et al18 reviewed 54 cases of liver disease in pregnancy in one UK hospital between 1997 and 2008. Of these, six patients with encephalopathy or elevated lactate were listed for liver transplant, including just one with a diagnosis of AFLP. This woman never actually underwent transplant but recovered in response to medical management alone.18 According to data reported in June 2011 by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network,30 liver transplantation was needed in only three US patients with AFLP between 2000 and 2011. Further retrospective studies on outcomes from transplant versus medical management should be considered to guide future decision making involving this invasive therapy.
The Case Patient
This 39-year-old patient presented during a routine prenatal visit with proteinuria and hypertension, possibly indicative of preeclampsia. Because of the serious nature of this potential diagnosis in pregnancy, she was admitted for monitoring and further testing. Although the diagnosis of AFLP was not confirmed until later, the patient’s preliminary lab studies showed elevated liver enzymes and low platelet counts, signifying the need for prompt intervention and delivery of the infant. At this point, the patient met criteria for HELLP syndrome, but AFLP was suspected after the initial finding of profound hypoglycemia led to further testing.
As an older mother experiencing pregnancy for the first time, this patient fit the profile for AFLP. She initially responded well after delivery of her infant but continued to experience complications. On the days that the patient was treated with TPE, her total bilirubin and liver enzymes were at their lowest. Perhaps this treatment should be considered in more cases of AFLP.
The patient was transferred to a hospital with liver transplantation capabilities, but she ultimately recovered without undergoing transplant.
Conclusion
For the primary obstetric care provider, being aware of the possible complications associated with pregnancy is important. Though uncommon, AFLP is a serious complication that should be ruled out in women who present with vague symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain in the third trimester of pregnancy. The reduction in AFLP-associated morbidity and mortality during the past 20 years is a direct result of increased early recognition and therapeutic delivery.
Referral to a maternal fetal medicine specialist, gastroenterologist, hematologist, and/or nephrologist may be necessary and appropriate in the management of a woman with AFLP. Further study is indicated for use of TPE in more severe cases of AFLP, particularly in women affected by persistent thrombocytopenia and anemia.
The author would like to thank C. Leanne Browning, MD, obstetrics/gynecology, for her invaluable guidance and advice on this project.
References
1. Martin JN Jr, Briery CM, Rose CH, et al. Postpartum plasma exchange as adjunctive therapy for severe acute fatty liver of pregnancy. J Clin Apher. 2009;23(4):138-143.
2. Knight M, Nelson-Piercy C, Kurinczuk JJ; UK Obstetric Surveillance System. A prospective national study of acute fatty liver of pregnancy in the UK. Gut. 2008;57(7):951-956.
3. Barsoom MJ, Tierney BJ. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy (2011). http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1562425-overview. Accessed January 21, 2013.
4. Ko HH, Yoshida E. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006;20(1):25-30.
5. Rathi U, Bapat M, Rathi P, Abraham P. Effect of liver disease on maternal and fetal outcome: a prospective study. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2007;26(2):59-63.
6. Myers L. Postpartum plasma exchange in a woman with suspected thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) vs hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet syndrome (HELLP): a case study. Nephrol Nurs J. 2010;37(4):399-402.
7. Vigil-de Gracia P. Acute fatty liver and HELLP syndrome: two distinct pregnancy disorders. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;73(3):215-220.
8. Aso K, Hojo S, Yumoto Y, et al. Three cases of acute fatty liver of pregnancy: postpartum clinical course depends on interval between onset of symptoms and termination of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(9):1047-1049.
9. Wei Q, Zhang L, Liu X. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a literature review and 11 new cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(4):751-756.
10. Barber MA, Eguiluz I, Martin A, et al. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: analysis of five consecutive cases from a tertiary centre. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(3):241-243.
11. Ajayi AO, Alao MO. Case report: acute fatty liver of pregnancy in a 30-year-old Nigerian primigravida. Niger J Clin Pract. 2008;11(4):389-391.
12. Vigíl-de Gracia P, Montufar-Rueda C. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and outcome based on 35 consecutive cases. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(9):1143-1146.
13. Dey M, Reema K. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy. N Am J Med Sci. 2012;4(11):611-612.
14. Castro MA, Goodwin TM, Shaw KJ, et al. Disseminated intravascular coagulation and antithrombin III depression in acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(1 pt 1):211-216.
15. Altuntas F, Aydogdu I, Kabukcu S, et al. Therapeutic plasma exchange for the treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a retrospective multicenter study. Transfus Apher Sci. 2007;36(1):57-67.
16. Hay JE. Liver disease in pregnancy. Hepatology. 2008;47(3):1067-1076.
17. Wand S, Waeschle RM, Von Ahsen N, et al. Acute fatty liver failure due to acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2012;78(4):503-506.
18. Westbrook RH, Yeoman AD, Joshi D, et al. Outcomes of severe pregnancy-related liver disease: refining the role of transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(11):2520-2526.
19. Fesenmeier MF, Coppage KH, Lambers DS, et al. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy in 3 tertiary care centers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1416-1419.
20. Bacq Y. Liver diseases unique to pregnancy: a 2010 update. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011;35(3):182-193.
21. Huether SE. Alterations of digestive function. In: McCance KL, Huether SE, eds. Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2009:1452-1515.
22. Huether SE. Structure and function of the digestive system. In: McCance KL, Huether SE, eds. Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2009:1420-1451.
23. Schutt VA, Minuk GY. Liver diseases unique to pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;21(5):771-792.
24. Pan C, Perumalswami PV. Pregnancy-related liver diseases. Clin Liver Dis. 2011;15(1):199-208.
25. Ibdah JA. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: an update on pathogenesis and clinical implications. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(46):7397-7404.
26. Browning MF, Levy HL, Wilkins-Haug LE, et al. Fetal fatty acid oxidation defects and maternal liver disease in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(1):115-120.
27. Dekker RR, Schutte JM, Stekelenburg J, et al. Maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity from acute fatty liver of pregnancy in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;157(1):27-31.
28. Lee NM, Brady CW. Liver disease in pregnancy. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(8):897-906.
29. Vora KS, Shah VR, Parikh GP. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a case report of an uncommon disease. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2009;13(1):34-36.
30. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. OPTN/SRTR 2011 Annual Data Report: Liver. http://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/annual_reports/2011/pdf/03_%20liver_12.pdf. Accessed January 18, 2013.
A 39-year-old black woman, gravida 1, para 0, with an intrauterine pregnancy of 34 weeks and three days (according to last menstrual period and nine-week ultrasound) presented to her Ob-Gyn office for a routine prenatal visit. She was found to have an elevated blood pressure with new onset of 2+ proteinuria. The patient was sent to the labor and delivery unit at the adjoining hospital for serial blood pressure readings, laboratory work, and fetal monitoring.
The patient’s previous medical history was limited to sinusitis. She was taking no prescription medications, and her only listed allergy was to pineapple. Initial lab studies revealed elevations in liver enzymes, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), uric acid, and serum creatinine, as well as thrombocytopenia (see Table 11-5). She also had a critically low blood glucose level, which conflicted with a normal follow-up reading.
At this point, the patient was thought to have HELLP syndrome6 (ie, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count), or possibly acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP).2,4,7-11 Additional labs were drawn immediately to confirm or rule out AFLP. These included repeat serum glucose (following a second reading with normal results), a serum ammonia level, prothrombin time (PT), and partial thromboplastin time (PTT). The most reliable values to distinguish AFLP from HELLP are profound hypoglycemia (found in 94% of women with AFLP12) and an elevated serum ammonia level.4
Given the serious nature of either diagnosis, immediate delivery of the infant was deemed necessary. Because the patient’s cervix was not found favorable for induction, she underwent low-transverse cesarean delivery without complications. She was noted to have essentially normal anatomy with the exception of a small subserosal fibroid posteriorly. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid was present. A male infant was delivered, weighing 5 lb with 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores of 8 and 9, respectively.
Postoperatively, the patient remained in the recovery area, where she received intensive monitoring. She experienced fluctuations in blood glucose, ranging from 33 to 144 mg/dL; she was started on 5% dextrose in lactated Ringer’s solution and treated with IV dextrose 50 g. While the patient was in surgical recovery, results from the second set of labs, drawn before surgery, were returned; findings included an elevated ammonia level and an abnormal coagulation panel, including PT of 25.3 sec, PTT of 48.4 sec, and a fibrinogen level of 116 mg/dL, confirming the suspected diagnosis of AFLP.
Magnesium sulfate, which had been started immediately postop, was discontinued on confirmation of the diagnosis of AFLP. The patient was initially somnolent as a result of general anesthesia but gradually returned to a fully normal sensorium by early morning on postop day 1. Postoperatively, the patient’s hemoglobin was found to be low (8.6 g/dL; reference range, 13.5 to 18.5 g/dL), so she was transfused with two units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) and given fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to correct this coagulopathy. The patient’s platelets were also low at 82,000/mm3 (reference range, 140,000 to 340,000/mm3).
On postop day 1, the patient’s serum creatinine rose to 4.2 mg/dL and her total bilirubin increased to 14.4 mg/dL (reference ranges, 0.6 to 1.2 mg/dL and < 1.0 mg/dL, respectively). Given the multiple systems affected by AFLP and the need for intensive supportive care, the patient was transferred to the ICU.
On her arrival at the ICU, the patient’s vital signs were initially stable, and she was alert and oriented. However, within the next few hours, she became hypotensive and encephalopathic. She required aggressive fluid resuscitation and multiple transfusions of PRBCs and FFP due to persistent anemia and coagulopathy. Her vital signs were stabilized, but she continued to need blood transfusions.
Postop day 2, the patient became less responsive and was soon unable to follow commands or speak clearly. Her breathing remained stable with just 3 L of oxygen by nasal cannula, but in order to prevent aspiration and in consideration of a postoperative ileus, it was necessary to place a nasogastric tube with low intermittent suction. This produced a bloody return, but no intervention other than close monitoring and transfusion was performed at that time.
Abdominal ultrasound showed ascites and mild left-sided hydronephrosis with no gallstones. The common bile duct measured 3 mm in diameter.
Although liver biopsy is considered the gold standard for a confirmed diagnosis of AFLP,13,14 this procedure was contraindicated by the patient’s coagulopathy. Concern was also expressed by one consultant that the patient might have thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) in addition to AFLP. TTP can manifest with similar findings, such as anemia, thrombocytopenia, neurologic symptoms, and renal abnormalities, but usually fever is involved, and the patient was afebrile. A catheter was placed for hemodialysis and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). Given that TTP-associated mortality is significantly decreased by use of TPE,15 this intervention was deemed prudent. The patient underwent TPE on three consecutive days, postop days 2 through 4.
The patient’s mental status began to improve, and by postop day 6, she was able to follow commands and engage in brief conversations. By postop day 9, she had returned almost completely to her baseline mental status.
The patient’s liver function test results and total bilirubin, ammonia, and creatinine levels all improved over the first few postoperative days but began to rise again by day 6. In response to worsening renal and hepatic functioning, the decision was made on postop day 9 to transfer the patient to a hospital with liver transplantation capabilities, should this procedure become necessary.
Discussion
AFLP is a rare condition specific to pregnancy, affecting 1/7,000 to 1/20,000 pregnancies. Due to the low incidence of this disease, randomized controlled trials to study it are not possible. Instead, clinicians must learn either from individual case studies or from retrospective syntheses of cases reported over time.1,2,7 Fortunately, the wealth of information gleaned over the past 30 years has significantly reduced AFLP-associated maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity rates. In the 1980s, maternal and fetal mortality rates as high as 85% were reported.3 Worldwide, maternal mortality associated with AFLP has decreased significantly to 7% to 18%, whereas the fetal mortality rate has fallen to between 9% and 23%.1,16,17
Common trends among women who have developed AFLP include nulliparity, multiparity, and advanced maternal age. One retrospective study of 57 women who had developed AFLP revealed that 35 cases (61%) involved first-time pregnancies. It also showed that 10 (18%) of the women had twins, and 14 (25%) were older than 35.2 In another study of 35 cases of AFLP, 40% of the women were nulliparous, and 11.4% were multiparous, including one triplet gestation.12 In a third, smaller study, 80% of women affected by AFLP were multiparous.10 Currently, there is no known evidence linking any maternal behavior to development of AFLP.
Presentation
Women who present with AFLP often experience vague, nonspecific symptoms, leading to misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. Objective measurements, including physical exam findings, laboratory studies, and other diagnostic tests, will help with a diagnosis. The most frequent initial symptoms are nausea and vomiting (in 70% of patients) and abdominal pain (50% to 80%), epigastric or right upper-quadrant.3 Other common symptoms include fatigue, malaise, anorexia, weight gain, polyuria, and polydipsia.2,3,9,18,19
Because the presenting symptoms in AFLP can be vague, clinicians should complete a thorough physical exam to differentiate accurately among conditions associated with pregnancy. Physical signs present in women with AFLP can include jaundice, ascites, edema, confusion, abdominal tenderness, and fever. More severe cases can present with multisystem involvement, including acute renal failure, gastrointestinal bleeding, pancreatitis, coagulopathy, and hepatic encephalopathy.3,4,9,18
Diagnostic Tests
Relevant laboratory tests include a complete blood count (CBC), liver studies, chemistry, coagulation studies, and urinalysis (see Table 1). Viral causes should be ruled out by way of a hepatitis panel.3 In AFLP, the CBC may show elevated white blood cells, decreased hemoglobin and hematocrit, and decreased platelets. Liver studies show elevated hepatic aminotransferase, bilirubin, LDH, and ammonia levels. Chemistry results show elevated blood urea nitrogen and creatinine, and decreased blood glucose. Coagulation factors are affected, and prolonged PTT, decreased fibrinogen, and proteinurea may also be found.9
Though invasive and not often necessary4,13 (and not possible for the case patient), the definitive diagnostic test for AFLP is liver biopsy.13,14 Biopsy reveals a microvesicular fatty infiltration of the hepatocytes as minute fat droplets surrounding a centrally located nucleus. These fatty infiltrates stain with oil red O, specific for fat. Inflammation is present in 50% of cases. There may also be a picture similar to cholestasis with bile thrombi or deposits within the hepatocytes.20
Due to the risk for hemorrhage and the critical status of women with AFLP, biopsy is often not possible. Ultrasonography may show increased echogenicity; CT may show decreased or diffuse attenuation in the liver. These imaging studies, though possibly helpful in severe cases, often yield false-negative results.3,20
In the absence of another explanation for the patient’s symptoms, the Swansea criteria are used for diagnosis of AFLP.1 Six or more of the following criteria must be present to confirm this diagnosis: vomiting, abdominal pain, polydipsia or polyuria, encephalopathy, leukocytosis, elevated bilirubin, elevated liver enzymes, elevated ammonia, hypoglycemia, renal dysfunction, coagulopathy, elevated uric acid, ascites on ultrasound, and microvesicular steatosis on liver biopsy.1,2,5
Pathophysiology
Normal functions of the liver include metabolism, protein synthesis, and manufacturing of blood coagulation proteins. These functions are disturbed in the presence of AFLP. Thus, women with this disease experience signs and symptoms related directly to the dysfunction of these processes.20-22
Disturbances in the hepatocytes due to excess fatty acids impair the liver’s ability to convert unconjugated bilirubin into conjugated bilirubin, causing plasma levels of unconjugated bilirubin to rise. This increase in bilirubin explains the jaundiced appearance of women with AFLP. AFLP is often thought to occur in conjunction with preeclampsia in many, but not all, patients. Thrombocytopenia in these patients is felt to be secondary to peripheral vascular consumption. Conjugated bilirubin levels may also be increased due to decreased flow of conjugated bilirubin into the common bile duct.21
Another liver function that is disrupted is that of glycogen storage and conversion to glucose, and the liver’s ability to convert nutrients into glycogen is also impaired. Decreased storage of glycogen, along with the liver’s inability to break down previously stored glycogen, causes a decrease in serum glucose levels. Women with AFLP often require treatment with IV dextrose in response to marked hypoglycemia.16,21,23
The liver dysfunction associated with AFLP reduces adequate production of clotting factors and coagulation proteins. Thrombocytopenia, elevated clotting times, and bleeding are all problems seen in AFLP. Mild to moderate elevations in serum aminotransferases and elevated LDH also occur in patients with AFLP.23,24
Genetic Factor
There is little known about the etiology of AFLP, although recent data point to a genetic component that was found in as many as 62% of mothers in one study and in 25% of infants in another study.20-22 Fatty acid oxidation (FAO) is one of the processes of hepatic mitochondria, a process that relies on several enzymes. When FAO is interrupted, fatty acids are deposited in the liver cells, as seen in histologic studies of AFLP.25,26 The common thread in women with this disease is a mutation in one of the enzymes needed for FAO. This enzyme is the long-chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase. Deficiencies in this enzyme are common in mothers with AFLP and their infants.3,16,20,23,27
Differential Diagnosis
Several complications of pregnancy that involve the liver may, on presentation, mimic AFLP.16,20,23,24,28 The most common are hyperemesis gravidarum and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy23 (see Table 216,20,23,24,28); others are preeclampsia/eclampsia and HELLP syndrome. It is important to distinguish between the signs and symptoms associated with each of these disorders in order to provide the most effective treatment. Hepatitis serologies are important in the differential diagnosis when liver enzyme levels are exceptionally high.4,16,22,28
Treatment
The most effective treatment for AFLP is delivery of the infant; often, this alone causes the signs and symptoms of AFLP to resolve.8,21,27,29 In two of three cases in a small study by Aso et al,8 early delivery of the fetus led to complete resolution of symptoms and return to normal liver function. One of these patients was sent home four days after delivery; the other, 14 days later. Other patients may require more invasive treatment and support.8
Management in the ICU is often required to provide appropriate supportive care to the mother after delivery. Acute respiratory distress syndrome, pancreatitis, hemorrhage, encephalopathy, renal failure, and continual liver failure are among the severe complications associated with AFLP.4,8,10 Many women require intubation, dialysis, fluid resuscitation, blood product transfusion, and vasopressor therapy.3,8,11 Prophylactic antibiotics, IV steroids, and glucose may all be required in the supportive care and recovery of a mother with AFLP.3,8,11
TPE has also been useful in instances of severe complications.1,3,6 In one retrospective study, Martin et al1 recommended administration of TPE in patients with AFLP under the following circumstances:
(1) Deteriorating central nervous system abnormalities, such as sensorium changes or coma;
(2) Persistent coagulopathy requiring continued and aggressive blood product support with plasma, red cells, and/or cryoprecipitate;
(3) Advanced renal dysfunction that compromised fluid management;
(4) Progressive cardiopulmonary compromise; and/or
(5) Ongoing fluid management concerns, including significant ascites, edema, anuria/oliguria, and/or fluid overload.1
In rare cases, liver transplantation is needed in patients with AFLP. Westbrook et al18 reviewed 54 cases of liver disease in pregnancy in one UK hospital between 1997 and 2008. Of these, six patients with encephalopathy or elevated lactate were listed for liver transplant, including just one with a diagnosis of AFLP. This woman never actually underwent transplant but recovered in response to medical management alone.18 According to data reported in June 2011 by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network,30 liver transplantation was needed in only three US patients with AFLP between 2000 and 2011. Further retrospective studies on outcomes from transplant versus medical management should be considered to guide future decision making involving this invasive therapy.
The Case Patient
This 39-year-old patient presented during a routine prenatal visit with proteinuria and hypertension, possibly indicative of preeclampsia. Because of the serious nature of this potential diagnosis in pregnancy, she was admitted for monitoring and further testing. Although the diagnosis of AFLP was not confirmed until later, the patient’s preliminary lab studies showed elevated liver enzymes and low platelet counts, signifying the need for prompt intervention and delivery of the infant. At this point, the patient met criteria for HELLP syndrome, but AFLP was suspected after the initial finding of profound hypoglycemia led to further testing.
As an older mother experiencing pregnancy for the first time, this patient fit the profile for AFLP. She initially responded well after delivery of her infant but continued to experience complications. On the days that the patient was treated with TPE, her total bilirubin and liver enzymes were at their lowest. Perhaps this treatment should be considered in more cases of AFLP.
The patient was transferred to a hospital with liver transplantation capabilities, but she ultimately recovered without undergoing transplant.
Conclusion
For the primary obstetric care provider, being aware of the possible complications associated with pregnancy is important. Though uncommon, AFLP is a serious complication that should be ruled out in women who present with vague symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain in the third trimester of pregnancy. The reduction in AFLP-associated morbidity and mortality during the past 20 years is a direct result of increased early recognition and therapeutic delivery.
Referral to a maternal fetal medicine specialist, gastroenterologist, hematologist, and/or nephrologist may be necessary and appropriate in the management of a woman with AFLP. Further study is indicated for use of TPE in more severe cases of AFLP, particularly in women affected by persistent thrombocytopenia and anemia.
The author would like to thank C. Leanne Browning, MD, obstetrics/gynecology, for her invaluable guidance and advice on this project.
References
1. Martin JN Jr, Briery CM, Rose CH, et al. Postpartum plasma exchange as adjunctive therapy for severe acute fatty liver of pregnancy. J Clin Apher. 2009;23(4):138-143.
2. Knight M, Nelson-Piercy C, Kurinczuk JJ; UK Obstetric Surveillance System. A prospective national study of acute fatty liver of pregnancy in the UK. Gut. 2008;57(7):951-956.
3. Barsoom MJ, Tierney BJ. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy (2011). http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1562425-overview. Accessed January 21, 2013.
4. Ko HH, Yoshida E. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006;20(1):25-30.
5. Rathi U, Bapat M, Rathi P, Abraham P. Effect of liver disease on maternal and fetal outcome: a prospective study. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2007;26(2):59-63.
6. Myers L. Postpartum plasma exchange in a woman with suspected thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) vs hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet syndrome (HELLP): a case study. Nephrol Nurs J. 2010;37(4):399-402.
7. Vigil-de Gracia P. Acute fatty liver and HELLP syndrome: two distinct pregnancy disorders. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;73(3):215-220.
8. Aso K, Hojo S, Yumoto Y, et al. Three cases of acute fatty liver of pregnancy: postpartum clinical course depends on interval between onset of symptoms and termination of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(9):1047-1049.
9. Wei Q, Zhang L, Liu X. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a literature review and 11 new cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(4):751-756.
10. Barber MA, Eguiluz I, Martin A, et al. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: analysis of five consecutive cases from a tertiary centre. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(3):241-243.
11. Ajayi AO, Alao MO. Case report: acute fatty liver of pregnancy in a 30-year-old Nigerian primigravida. Niger J Clin Pract. 2008;11(4):389-391.
12. Vigíl-de Gracia P, Montufar-Rueda C. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and outcome based on 35 consecutive cases. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(9):1143-1146.
13. Dey M, Reema K. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy. N Am J Med Sci. 2012;4(11):611-612.
14. Castro MA, Goodwin TM, Shaw KJ, et al. Disseminated intravascular coagulation and antithrombin III depression in acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(1 pt 1):211-216.
15. Altuntas F, Aydogdu I, Kabukcu S, et al. Therapeutic plasma exchange for the treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a retrospective multicenter study. Transfus Apher Sci. 2007;36(1):57-67.
16. Hay JE. Liver disease in pregnancy. Hepatology. 2008;47(3):1067-1076.
17. Wand S, Waeschle RM, Von Ahsen N, et al. Acute fatty liver failure due to acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2012;78(4):503-506.
18. Westbrook RH, Yeoman AD, Joshi D, et al. Outcomes of severe pregnancy-related liver disease: refining the role of transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(11):2520-2526.
19. Fesenmeier MF, Coppage KH, Lambers DS, et al. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy in 3 tertiary care centers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1416-1419.
20. Bacq Y. Liver diseases unique to pregnancy: a 2010 update. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011;35(3):182-193.
21. Huether SE. Alterations of digestive function. In: McCance KL, Huether SE, eds. Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2009:1452-1515.
22. Huether SE. Structure and function of the digestive system. In: McCance KL, Huether SE, eds. Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2009:1420-1451.
23. Schutt VA, Minuk GY. Liver diseases unique to pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;21(5):771-792.
24. Pan C, Perumalswami PV. Pregnancy-related liver diseases. Clin Liver Dis. 2011;15(1):199-208.
25. Ibdah JA. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: an update on pathogenesis and clinical implications. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(46):7397-7404.
26. Browning MF, Levy HL, Wilkins-Haug LE, et al. Fetal fatty acid oxidation defects and maternal liver disease in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(1):115-120.
27. Dekker RR, Schutte JM, Stekelenburg J, et al. Maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity from acute fatty liver of pregnancy in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;157(1):27-31.
28. Lee NM, Brady CW. Liver disease in pregnancy. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(8):897-906.
29. Vora KS, Shah VR, Parikh GP. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a case report of an uncommon disease. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2009;13(1):34-36.
30. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. OPTN/SRTR 2011 Annual Data Report: Liver. http://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/annual_reports/2011/pdf/03_%20liver_12.pdf. Accessed January 18, 2013.
A 39-year-old black woman, gravida 1, para 0, with an intrauterine pregnancy of 34 weeks and three days (according to last menstrual period and nine-week ultrasound) presented to her Ob-Gyn office for a routine prenatal visit. She was found to have an elevated blood pressure with new onset of 2+ proteinuria. The patient was sent to the labor and delivery unit at the adjoining hospital for serial blood pressure readings, laboratory work, and fetal monitoring.
The patient’s previous medical history was limited to sinusitis. She was taking no prescription medications, and her only listed allergy was to pineapple. Initial lab studies revealed elevations in liver enzymes, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), uric acid, and serum creatinine, as well as thrombocytopenia (see Table 11-5). She also had a critically low blood glucose level, which conflicted with a normal follow-up reading.
At this point, the patient was thought to have HELLP syndrome6 (ie, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count), or possibly acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP).2,4,7-11 Additional labs were drawn immediately to confirm or rule out AFLP. These included repeat serum glucose (following a second reading with normal results), a serum ammonia level, prothrombin time (PT), and partial thromboplastin time (PTT). The most reliable values to distinguish AFLP from HELLP are profound hypoglycemia (found in 94% of women with AFLP12) and an elevated serum ammonia level.4
Given the serious nature of either diagnosis, immediate delivery of the infant was deemed necessary. Because the patient’s cervix was not found favorable for induction, she underwent low-transverse cesarean delivery without complications. She was noted to have essentially normal anatomy with the exception of a small subserosal fibroid posteriorly. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid was present. A male infant was delivered, weighing 5 lb with 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores of 8 and 9, respectively.
Postoperatively, the patient remained in the recovery area, where she received intensive monitoring. She experienced fluctuations in blood glucose, ranging from 33 to 144 mg/dL; she was started on 5% dextrose in lactated Ringer’s solution and treated with IV dextrose 50 g. While the patient was in surgical recovery, results from the second set of labs, drawn before surgery, were returned; findings included an elevated ammonia level and an abnormal coagulation panel, including PT of 25.3 sec, PTT of 48.4 sec, and a fibrinogen level of 116 mg/dL, confirming the suspected diagnosis of AFLP.
Magnesium sulfate, which had been started immediately postop, was discontinued on confirmation of the diagnosis of AFLP. The patient was initially somnolent as a result of general anesthesia but gradually returned to a fully normal sensorium by early morning on postop day 1. Postoperatively, the patient’s hemoglobin was found to be low (8.6 g/dL; reference range, 13.5 to 18.5 g/dL), so she was transfused with two units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) and given fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to correct this coagulopathy. The patient’s platelets were also low at 82,000/mm3 (reference range, 140,000 to 340,000/mm3).
On postop day 1, the patient’s serum creatinine rose to 4.2 mg/dL and her total bilirubin increased to 14.4 mg/dL (reference ranges, 0.6 to 1.2 mg/dL and < 1.0 mg/dL, respectively). Given the multiple systems affected by AFLP and the need for intensive supportive care, the patient was transferred to the ICU.
On her arrival at the ICU, the patient’s vital signs were initially stable, and she was alert and oriented. However, within the next few hours, she became hypotensive and encephalopathic. She required aggressive fluid resuscitation and multiple transfusions of PRBCs and FFP due to persistent anemia and coagulopathy. Her vital signs were stabilized, but she continued to need blood transfusions.
Postop day 2, the patient became less responsive and was soon unable to follow commands or speak clearly. Her breathing remained stable with just 3 L of oxygen by nasal cannula, but in order to prevent aspiration and in consideration of a postoperative ileus, it was necessary to place a nasogastric tube with low intermittent suction. This produced a bloody return, but no intervention other than close monitoring and transfusion was performed at that time.
Abdominal ultrasound showed ascites and mild left-sided hydronephrosis with no gallstones. The common bile duct measured 3 mm in diameter.
Although liver biopsy is considered the gold standard for a confirmed diagnosis of AFLP,13,14 this procedure was contraindicated by the patient’s coagulopathy. Concern was also expressed by one consultant that the patient might have thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) in addition to AFLP. TTP can manifest with similar findings, such as anemia, thrombocytopenia, neurologic symptoms, and renal abnormalities, but usually fever is involved, and the patient was afebrile. A catheter was placed for hemodialysis and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). Given that TTP-associated mortality is significantly decreased by use of TPE,15 this intervention was deemed prudent. The patient underwent TPE on three consecutive days, postop days 2 through 4.
The patient’s mental status began to improve, and by postop day 6, she was able to follow commands and engage in brief conversations. By postop day 9, she had returned almost completely to her baseline mental status.
The patient’s liver function test results and total bilirubin, ammonia, and creatinine levels all improved over the first few postoperative days but began to rise again by day 6. In response to worsening renal and hepatic functioning, the decision was made on postop day 9 to transfer the patient to a hospital with liver transplantation capabilities, should this procedure become necessary.
Discussion
AFLP is a rare condition specific to pregnancy, affecting 1/7,000 to 1/20,000 pregnancies. Due to the low incidence of this disease, randomized controlled trials to study it are not possible. Instead, clinicians must learn either from individual case studies or from retrospective syntheses of cases reported over time.1,2,7 Fortunately, the wealth of information gleaned over the past 30 years has significantly reduced AFLP-associated maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity rates. In the 1980s, maternal and fetal mortality rates as high as 85% were reported.3 Worldwide, maternal mortality associated with AFLP has decreased significantly to 7% to 18%, whereas the fetal mortality rate has fallen to between 9% and 23%.1,16,17
Common trends among women who have developed AFLP include nulliparity, multiparity, and advanced maternal age. One retrospective study of 57 women who had developed AFLP revealed that 35 cases (61%) involved first-time pregnancies. It also showed that 10 (18%) of the women had twins, and 14 (25%) were older than 35.2 In another study of 35 cases of AFLP, 40% of the women were nulliparous, and 11.4% were multiparous, including one triplet gestation.12 In a third, smaller study, 80% of women affected by AFLP were multiparous.10 Currently, there is no known evidence linking any maternal behavior to development of AFLP.
Presentation
Women who present with AFLP often experience vague, nonspecific symptoms, leading to misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. Objective measurements, including physical exam findings, laboratory studies, and other diagnostic tests, will help with a diagnosis. The most frequent initial symptoms are nausea and vomiting (in 70% of patients) and abdominal pain (50% to 80%), epigastric or right upper-quadrant.3 Other common symptoms include fatigue, malaise, anorexia, weight gain, polyuria, and polydipsia.2,3,9,18,19
Because the presenting symptoms in AFLP can be vague, clinicians should complete a thorough physical exam to differentiate accurately among conditions associated with pregnancy. Physical signs present in women with AFLP can include jaundice, ascites, edema, confusion, abdominal tenderness, and fever. More severe cases can present with multisystem involvement, including acute renal failure, gastrointestinal bleeding, pancreatitis, coagulopathy, and hepatic encephalopathy.3,4,9,18
Diagnostic Tests
Relevant laboratory tests include a complete blood count (CBC), liver studies, chemistry, coagulation studies, and urinalysis (see Table 1). Viral causes should be ruled out by way of a hepatitis panel.3 In AFLP, the CBC may show elevated white blood cells, decreased hemoglobin and hematocrit, and decreased platelets. Liver studies show elevated hepatic aminotransferase, bilirubin, LDH, and ammonia levels. Chemistry results show elevated blood urea nitrogen and creatinine, and decreased blood glucose. Coagulation factors are affected, and prolonged PTT, decreased fibrinogen, and proteinurea may also be found.9
Though invasive and not often necessary4,13 (and not possible for the case patient), the definitive diagnostic test for AFLP is liver biopsy.13,14 Biopsy reveals a microvesicular fatty infiltration of the hepatocytes as minute fat droplets surrounding a centrally located nucleus. These fatty infiltrates stain with oil red O, specific for fat. Inflammation is present in 50% of cases. There may also be a picture similar to cholestasis with bile thrombi or deposits within the hepatocytes.20
Due to the risk for hemorrhage and the critical status of women with AFLP, biopsy is often not possible. Ultrasonography may show increased echogenicity; CT may show decreased or diffuse attenuation in the liver. These imaging studies, though possibly helpful in severe cases, often yield false-negative results.3,20
In the absence of another explanation for the patient’s symptoms, the Swansea criteria are used for diagnosis of AFLP.1 Six or more of the following criteria must be present to confirm this diagnosis: vomiting, abdominal pain, polydipsia or polyuria, encephalopathy, leukocytosis, elevated bilirubin, elevated liver enzymes, elevated ammonia, hypoglycemia, renal dysfunction, coagulopathy, elevated uric acid, ascites on ultrasound, and microvesicular steatosis on liver biopsy.1,2,5
Pathophysiology
Normal functions of the liver include metabolism, protein synthesis, and manufacturing of blood coagulation proteins. These functions are disturbed in the presence of AFLP. Thus, women with this disease experience signs and symptoms related directly to the dysfunction of these processes.20-22
Disturbances in the hepatocytes due to excess fatty acids impair the liver’s ability to convert unconjugated bilirubin into conjugated bilirubin, causing plasma levels of unconjugated bilirubin to rise. This increase in bilirubin explains the jaundiced appearance of women with AFLP. AFLP is often thought to occur in conjunction with preeclampsia in many, but not all, patients. Thrombocytopenia in these patients is felt to be secondary to peripheral vascular consumption. Conjugated bilirubin levels may also be increased due to decreased flow of conjugated bilirubin into the common bile duct.21
Another liver function that is disrupted is that of glycogen storage and conversion to glucose, and the liver’s ability to convert nutrients into glycogen is also impaired. Decreased storage of glycogen, along with the liver’s inability to break down previously stored glycogen, causes a decrease in serum glucose levels. Women with AFLP often require treatment with IV dextrose in response to marked hypoglycemia.16,21,23
The liver dysfunction associated with AFLP reduces adequate production of clotting factors and coagulation proteins. Thrombocytopenia, elevated clotting times, and bleeding are all problems seen in AFLP. Mild to moderate elevations in serum aminotransferases and elevated LDH also occur in patients with AFLP.23,24
Genetic Factor
There is little known about the etiology of AFLP, although recent data point to a genetic component that was found in as many as 62% of mothers in one study and in 25% of infants in another study.20-22 Fatty acid oxidation (FAO) is one of the processes of hepatic mitochondria, a process that relies on several enzymes. When FAO is interrupted, fatty acids are deposited in the liver cells, as seen in histologic studies of AFLP.25,26 The common thread in women with this disease is a mutation in one of the enzymes needed for FAO. This enzyme is the long-chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase. Deficiencies in this enzyme are common in mothers with AFLP and their infants.3,16,20,23,27
Differential Diagnosis
Several complications of pregnancy that involve the liver may, on presentation, mimic AFLP.16,20,23,24,28 The most common are hyperemesis gravidarum and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy23 (see Table 216,20,23,24,28); others are preeclampsia/eclampsia and HELLP syndrome. It is important to distinguish between the signs and symptoms associated with each of these disorders in order to provide the most effective treatment. Hepatitis serologies are important in the differential diagnosis when liver enzyme levels are exceptionally high.4,16,22,28
Treatment
The most effective treatment for AFLP is delivery of the infant; often, this alone causes the signs and symptoms of AFLP to resolve.8,21,27,29 In two of three cases in a small study by Aso et al,8 early delivery of the fetus led to complete resolution of symptoms and return to normal liver function. One of these patients was sent home four days after delivery; the other, 14 days later. Other patients may require more invasive treatment and support.8
Management in the ICU is often required to provide appropriate supportive care to the mother after delivery. Acute respiratory distress syndrome, pancreatitis, hemorrhage, encephalopathy, renal failure, and continual liver failure are among the severe complications associated with AFLP.4,8,10 Many women require intubation, dialysis, fluid resuscitation, blood product transfusion, and vasopressor therapy.3,8,11 Prophylactic antibiotics, IV steroids, and glucose may all be required in the supportive care and recovery of a mother with AFLP.3,8,11
TPE has also been useful in instances of severe complications.1,3,6 In one retrospective study, Martin et al1 recommended administration of TPE in patients with AFLP under the following circumstances:
(1) Deteriorating central nervous system abnormalities, such as sensorium changes or coma;
(2) Persistent coagulopathy requiring continued and aggressive blood product support with plasma, red cells, and/or cryoprecipitate;
(3) Advanced renal dysfunction that compromised fluid management;
(4) Progressive cardiopulmonary compromise; and/or
(5) Ongoing fluid management concerns, including significant ascites, edema, anuria/oliguria, and/or fluid overload.1
In rare cases, liver transplantation is needed in patients with AFLP. Westbrook et al18 reviewed 54 cases of liver disease in pregnancy in one UK hospital between 1997 and 2008. Of these, six patients with encephalopathy or elevated lactate were listed for liver transplant, including just one with a diagnosis of AFLP. This woman never actually underwent transplant but recovered in response to medical management alone.18 According to data reported in June 2011 by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network,30 liver transplantation was needed in only three US patients with AFLP between 2000 and 2011. Further retrospective studies on outcomes from transplant versus medical management should be considered to guide future decision making involving this invasive therapy.
The Case Patient
This 39-year-old patient presented during a routine prenatal visit with proteinuria and hypertension, possibly indicative of preeclampsia. Because of the serious nature of this potential diagnosis in pregnancy, she was admitted for monitoring and further testing. Although the diagnosis of AFLP was not confirmed until later, the patient’s preliminary lab studies showed elevated liver enzymes and low platelet counts, signifying the need for prompt intervention and delivery of the infant. At this point, the patient met criteria for HELLP syndrome, but AFLP was suspected after the initial finding of profound hypoglycemia led to further testing.
As an older mother experiencing pregnancy for the first time, this patient fit the profile for AFLP. She initially responded well after delivery of her infant but continued to experience complications. On the days that the patient was treated with TPE, her total bilirubin and liver enzymes were at their lowest. Perhaps this treatment should be considered in more cases of AFLP.
The patient was transferred to a hospital with liver transplantation capabilities, but she ultimately recovered without undergoing transplant.
Conclusion
For the primary obstetric care provider, being aware of the possible complications associated with pregnancy is important. Though uncommon, AFLP is a serious complication that should be ruled out in women who present with vague symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain in the third trimester of pregnancy. The reduction in AFLP-associated morbidity and mortality during the past 20 years is a direct result of increased early recognition and therapeutic delivery.
Referral to a maternal fetal medicine specialist, gastroenterologist, hematologist, and/or nephrologist may be necessary and appropriate in the management of a woman with AFLP. Further study is indicated for use of TPE in more severe cases of AFLP, particularly in women affected by persistent thrombocytopenia and anemia.
The author would like to thank C. Leanne Browning, MD, obstetrics/gynecology, for her invaluable guidance and advice on this project.
References
1. Martin JN Jr, Briery CM, Rose CH, et al. Postpartum plasma exchange as adjunctive therapy for severe acute fatty liver of pregnancy. J Clin Apher. 2009;23(4):138-143.
2. Knight M, Nelson-Piercy C, Kurinczuk JJ; UK Obstetric Surveillance System. A prospective national study of acute fatty liver of pregnancy in the UK. Gut. 2008;57(7):951-956.
3. Barsoom MJ, Tierney BJ. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy (2011). http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1562425-overview. Accessed January 21, 2013.
4. Ko HH, Yoshida E. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006;20(1):25-30.
5. Rathi U, Bapat M, Rathi P, Abraham P. Effect of liver disease on maternal and fetal outcome: a prospective study. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2007;26(2):59-63.
6. Myers L. Postpartum plasma exchange in a woman with suspected thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) vs hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet syndrome (HELLP): a case study. Nephrol Nurs J. 2010;37(4):399-402.
7. Vigil-de Gracia P. Acute fatty liver and HELLP syndrome: two distinct pregnancy disorders. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;73(3):215-220.
8. Aso K, Hojo S, Yumoto Y, et al. Three cases of acute fatty liver of pregnancy: postpartum clinical course depends on interval between onset of symptoms and termination of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(9):1047-1049.
9. Wei Q, Zhang L, Liu X. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a literature review and 11 new cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(4):751-756.
10. Barber MA, Eguiluz I, Martin A, et al. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: analysis of five consecutive cases from a tertiary centre. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(3):241-243.
11. Ajayi AO, Alao MO. Case report: acute fatty liver of pregnancy in a 30-year-old Nigerian primigravida. Niger J Clin Pract. 2008;11(4):389-391.
12. Vigíl-de Gracia P, Montufar-Rueda C. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and outcome based on 35 consecutive cases. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(9):1143-1146.
13. Dey M, Reema K. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy. N Am J Med Sci. 2012;4(11):611-612.
14. Castro MA, Goodwin TM, Shaw KJ, et al. Disseminated intravascular coagulation and antithrombin III depression in acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(1 pt 1):211-216.
15. Altuntas F, Aydogdu I, Kabukcu S, et al. Therapeutic plasma exchange for the treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a retrospective multicenter study. Transfus Apher Sci. 2007;36(1):57-67.
16. Hay JE. Liver disease in pregnancy. Hepatology. 2008;47(3):1067-1076.
17. Wand S, Waeschle RM, Von Ahsen N, et al. Acute fatty liver failure due to acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2012;78(4):503-506.
18. Westbrook RH, Yeoman AD, Joshi D, et al. Outcomes of severe pregnancy-related liver disease: refining the role of transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(11):2520-2526.
19. Fesenmeier MF, Coppage KH, Lambers DS, et al. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy in 3 tertiary care centers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1416-1419.
20. Bacq Y. Liver diseases unique to pregnancy: a 2010 update. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011;35(3):182-193.
21. Huether SE. Alterations of digestive function. In: McCance KL, Huether SE, eds. Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2009:1452-1515.
22. Huether SE. Structure and function of the digestive system. In: McCance KL, Huether SE, eds. Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2009:1420-1451.
23. Schutt VA, Minuk GY. Liver diseases unique to pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;21(5):771-792.
24. Pan C, Perumalswami PV. Pregnancy-related liver diseases. Clin Liver Dis. 2011;15(1):199-208.
25. Ibdah JA. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: an update on pathogenesis and clinical implications. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(46):7397-7404.
26. Browning MF, Levy HL, Wilkins-Haug LE, et al. Fetal fatty acid oxidation defects and maternal liver disease in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(1):115-120.
27. Dekker RR, Schutte JM, Stekelenburg J, et al. Maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity from acute fatty liver of pregnancy in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;157(1):27-31.
28. Lee NM, Brady CW. Liver disease in pregnancy. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(8):897-906.
29. Vora KS, Shah VR, Parikh GP. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a case report of an uncommon disease. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2009;13(1):34-36.
30. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. OPTN/SRTR 2011 Annual Data Report: Liver. http://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/annual_reports/2011/pdf/03_%20liver_12.pdf. Accessed January 18, 2013.
Fish "Sticks"
Cover
Have you tried these innovative alternatives to antibiotics for UTI prevention?
The authors report no financial relationships relevant to this article.
CASE: Recurrent UTI and antibiotic resistance
A 53-year-old postmenopausal woman with a history of culture-proven recurrent Escherichia coli urinary tract infections (UTIs) presents to the clinic with symptoms of UTI. She was previously treated with a postcoital regimen of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, based on sensitivities identified by culture. A past work-up of her upper and lower urinary tract was negative. You send a catheterized specimen for culture; again, E. coli is identified as the pathogen but proves resistant to her current antibiotic regimen.
What treatment alternatives, aside from antibiotics, are available for this patient—and how might they affect resistance?
Increased antibiotic usage has led to greater bacterial resistance, which is perpetuated by clonal spread. Resistant strains of E. coli have been found in household members, suggesting host-host transmission as a mechanism for dissemination. Alternative treatments that reduce the use of antibiotics may minimize bacterial resistance and increase the efficacy of treatment. In the TABLE , we summarize alternative approaches to the treatment of recurrent UTI. We also describe a strategy to alleviate symptoms.
Alternatives to antibiotics in the treatment and prevention of recurrent UTI
| Category | Type | Examples and doses, if recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Vaginal estrogen | Conjugated estrogen cream Estradiol
| Premarin cream, 0.5–2 g vaginally twice weekly
|
| Nutritive agents | Cranberry juice Cranberry tablets Cystopurin Lactobacilli Blueberry products | Not recommended 1 tablet (300 to 400 mg, depending on manufacturer) twice daily Not recommended Vivag, EcoVag, 1 capsule daily by vagina for 5 days, then once weekly for 10 weeks Not recommended |
| Anti-infective drugs | Methenamine hippurate Methenamine mandelate Methylene blue | Urex or Hiprex, 1 g orally twice daily Mandelamine, 1 g orally 4 times daily Future therapy |
| Urinary acidifiers | Vitamin C/ascorbic acid | 1–3 g orally 3–4 times daily |
| Herbal remedies | Uva ursi Forskolin | Not recommended for long-term use Not recommended |
| Behavioral changes | Adequate hydration Postcoital voiding |
Vaginal estrogen is the only proven alternative to antibiotics for postmenopausal women
A lack of estrogen is a risk factor for UTI and is associated with atrophic mucosa, leading to decreased colonization with lactobacilli, increased vaginal pH, and E. coli colonization.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravaginal estriol cream versus placebo in 93 postmenopausal women found a significant decrease in the rate of UTI among women who used the cream.1 After 8 months of follow-up, the incidence of UTI was 0.5 vs 5.9 episodes per patient-year (P <.001). Interestingly, all pretreatment cultures were negative for lactobacilli. One month after treatment, 61% of women in the estriol group were culture-positive for lactobacilli, compared with 0% of the placebo group.1
A 2008 Cochrane review of nine studies concluded that vaginal estrogen reduces the number of UTIs in postmenopausal women, with variation based on the type of estrogen and duration of use.2
Adverse effects are mild
Twenty-eight percent of the estriol group in the randomized trial described above withdrew from treatment, with 20% citing local side effects, including vaginal irritation, burning, or itching—all of which were mild and self-limited.1 Other possible adverse effects include breast tenderness, vaginal bleeding or spotting, and discharge.2
Clinical recommendations
Given the efficacy of this therapy, we recommend topical estrogen for postmenopausal patients with recurrent UTIs.
Cranberry juice may reduce UTI, but many patients withdraw
from treatment
Cranberries belong to the Vaccinium species, which contains all flavonoids, including anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins. It was previously thought that the acidification of urine produced an antibacterial effect, but several trials have documented no change in urine levels of hippuric acid when cranberry products are given, with no acidification of the urine.3 Current theory suggests that cranberries prevent bacteria from adhering to the uroepithelial cells of the walls of the bladder, by blocking expression of E. coli’s adhesion molecule, P. fimbriae, so that bacteria are unable to penetrate the mucosal surface.4,5 The major benefit of cranberry products over antibiotic prophylaxis is that they do not have the potential for resistance.4
A 2008 Cochrane review concluded that cranberry juice may reduce symptomatic UTIs, particularly among young, sexually active women—but there is a high rate of withdrawal from treatment.6 The optimal method of administration and dose remain unclear. In contrast, two recent randomized, controlled trials—published after the Cochrane review—found no difference in the rate of recurrent UTI in premenopausal women.7,8 Adverse effects in these two trials included constipation, heartburn, loose stools, vaginal itching and dryness, and migraines. Of note, there was no statistical difference in side effects between the cranberry and placebo groups.7
Vaccinium tablets may be protective in older women
Cranberry extracts of 500 mg to 1,000 mg daily have been compared with antimicrobial prophylaxis in two randomized, double-blind, controlled trials. The trials demonstrated mixed benefits. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was associated with a lower rate of UTI in younger women, compared with cranberry extracts alone (P=.02), while cranberry extracts were slightly more effective than trimethoprim alone in older women.9,10 Cranberry tablets were not associated with bacterial resistance, were cheaper, and were viewed as a more natural option. The interventions were equally well tolerated.
Overall efficacy of cranberry tablets is unclear. Side effects, albeit mild, included gastrointestinal disturbances, vaginal complaints, and rash or urticaria. There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse effects between antimicrobial treatment and cranberry tablets.9
Cystopurin has not been studied
Cystopurin is an over-the-counter (OTC) tablet containing cranberry extract and potassium citrate that is taken three times daily (3 g/dose) for 2 days. Interestingly, although a proposed mechanism for the efficacy of vitamin C and cranberry juice has been a reduction of pH, potassium citrate is an alkalizing agent that is reported to relieve burning and reduce urinary urgency and frequency. No studies have assessed this medication in the treatment of a UTI or its symptoms.
Clinical recommendations
The evidence is mixed on the use of cranberry products to reduce recurrent UTI. However, given the limited side effects associated with these products, we offer cranberry tablets to patients who have recurrent UTIs who are interested in a more natural alternative.
We generally do not recommend cranberry juice because the added fluid volume tends to exacerbate frequency and urgency symptoms.
Lactobacilli suppositories may benefit
postmenopausal women
Lactobacilli are fastidious gram-positive rods and are usually the dominant component of the vaginal flora.11 They prevent colonization and infection by more virulent bacteria by competing for adhesion receptors and nutrients as well as producing antimicrobial substances such as hydrogen peroxide and lactic acid. A decrease in lactobacilli leaves the urinary tract susceptible to infectious organisms that may colonize the vaginal mucosa and increase the risk of recurrent UTI.12-14
A 2008 review of randomized, controlled trials of oral lactobacilli and UTI was inconclusive, due to inconsistent dosing strategies and small sample sizes.15 A 2011 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of Lactin-V, a lactobacilli vaginal suppository, found that it reduced the rate of recurrent UTI. Lactin-V contains a hydrogen-peroxide–producing Lactobacillus crispatus developed as a probiotic that was determined to be safe and tolerable as a vaginal suppository in a phase 1 trial.16 The phase 2 trial enrolled 100 young premenopausal women with a history of recurrent UTI who took either Lactin-V or placebo daily for 5 days, then weekly for 10 weeks. Women in the Lactin-V group who had high levels of L. crispatus colonization experienced a significant reduction in the rate of UTI (15% vs 27% in the placebo group), but the effect did not reach statistical significance.14
Little difference in adverse effects
Adverse effects were reported among 56% of patients who received Lactin-V versus 50% of those given placebo. The most common of these were vaginal discharge, itching, and moderate abdominal discomfort.14 Although lactobacillus can potentially promote UTI, this phenomenon is rare.11
Regrettably, Lactin-V is not currently available in the United States. However, there are other lactobacilli vaginal suppositories on the market ( TABLE ). Given the low risk associated with their use, they should be considered as an alternative for patients who cannot or will not use estrogen.
Clinical recommendations
Probiotics such as lactobacilli are categorized as “dietary supplements”; as such, they are not regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration. We recommend the use of lactobacilli suppositories in postmenopausal women who have a contraindication to (or prefer to avoid) vaginal estrogen.
Skip blueberry products for now
Like cranberries, blueberries belong to the Vaccinium species and are thought to interfere with bacterial adhesion to the walls of the bladder. One in vitro trial suggests that blueberries also have antiproliferation effects, although no clinical studies have been performed to date to further investigate safety or efficacy.4 Consequently, we do not recommend use of these products.
Methenamine salts may benefit some populations
These anti-infective agents, including methenamine hippurate and methenamine mandelate, often are used to prevent UTI. They are found in combination OTC medications, such as Prosed DS and Urelle. Methenamine salts are bacteriostatic to all urinary tract pathogens due to their production of formaldehyde.3,16
Although methenamine produces varying concentrations of formaldehyde, depending on the acidity of the urine, there is no evidence that acidified urine enhances methenamine’s effects.16
Advantages of methenamine include the fact that it produces no changes in gut flora, poses no risk for antimicrobial resistance, and has low toxicity. It also is low in cost.17
Methenamine is contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency or severe hepatic disease.
Adverse reactions are generally mild and include gastrointestinal disturbances, skin rashes, dysuria, and microscopic hematuria.16
Methenamine hippurate
A 2007 Cochrane review, deemed up to date in 2010, analyzed 13 randomized, controlled trials involving 2,032 participants. Subgroup analyses suggested that methenamine hippurate may be of some benefit to patients without renal tract abnormalities; these patients experienced significantly reduced symptoms after short-term treatment of 1 week or less.
Patients with spinal injury do not appear to benefit from treatment, according to a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial by Lee and colleagues.18
Methenamine mandelate
This agent is commonly used to prevent recurrent UTI, although there is a paucity of randomized, controlled trials to support its use. One such trial in patients with neurogenic bladder found that methenamine mandelate with acidification was superior to placebo (P <.02) for preventing UTI.19 Beyond this population, however, it’s difficult to assess methenamine’s efficacy in the prevention of recurrent UTI.
Methylene blue may be useful in the elderly
Methylene blue is a light-activated compound described as “photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy” (PACT). Once illuminated, it becomes a bactericide, causing excitation of electrons followed by one of two reactions:
- reduction oxidation
- formation of a labile singlet oxygen and then oxidation.
This makes resistance unlikely.
In an in vitro study, methylene blue was as effective as levofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumonia, Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus, and Staphylococcus aureus when illuminated.
Potential benefits of this mode of treatment include local exposure and no drug interactions.
We suggest that methylene blue be placed and illuminated with a special catheter that would target UTI in the elderly population, among whom 52% of UTIs are associated with use of catheters.20 In vivo effects, adverse effects, and cost are not known, which limits current applicability of this compound.
Vitamin C may reduce UTI in pregnancy
The proposed mechanism for the efficacy of vitamin C for the treatment of UTI is the acidification of urine, which is believed to reduce the proliferation of bacteria. However, several studies have shown that vitamin C, at various doses, does not reliably reduce urine pH.15,21,22 Nonetheless, ascorbic acid was tested for its effect on UTI prevention during pregnancy.
In a single-blind trial, 110 pregnant women were divided into two groups (55 in each group):
- One group received ferrous sulfate (200 mg), folic acid (5 mg), and vitamin C (100 mg) daily for 3 months
- The other received ferrous sulfate (200 mg) and folic acid (5 mg) daily for 3 months.
Urine was cultured monthly. The incidence of UTI was significantly lower in the group receiving vitamin C (12.7%), compared with the control group (29.1%) (P=.03; odds ratio [OR], 0.35).23
Uva ursi may have a prophylactic effect
Uva ursi (UVA-E) is one of the most commonly used herbal supplements for treatment of UTI. The crude extract from Bearberry or Arctostaphylos uva-ursi has been shown to act as an antimicrobial by decreasing bacterial adherence.24 In addition, investigators have found the extract to have diuretic and anti-inflammatory properties.25,26 However, few studies have explored its efficacy. One randomized, controlled trial that included 57 women (30 allocated to UVA-E and 27 to placebo) found a statistically significant reduction in the rate of recurrence at 1 year among women taking UVA-E, compared with those who did not.27
Note that the women in this trial were given UVA-E for 1 month only. Long-term use of this herb has not been studied and may cause liver damage.
In a mouse model, forskolin reduced urinary-tract E. coli
This herb is derived from Indian coleus (Coleus forskohlii), a member of the mint family. It has been used primarily for its antiasthmatic, spasmolytic, and antihypertensive effects. It is believed to activate adenylate cyclase, increasing intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) concentrations and activating a number of key enzymatic pathways.28
The findings of a recent observational study have spurred the use of forskolin in the treatment of recurrent UTI.29 In the study, conducted on mice, when forskolin was injected into the bladder, intracellular E. coli decreased.
It is theorized that the incorporation of bacteria into intracellular vesicles of the bladder prevents exposure to antibiotics. When combined with an antibiotic, forskolin may increase bacterial elimination and thus lower the risk of recurrent infection. However, no randomized trials have evaluated the efficacy of this treatment.
Patients who are already taking antihypertensive medications should be cautious when using this herb, as it may lead to a drop in blood pressure.
Behavior changes are risk-free
One of the natural mechanisms that promotes bacterial elimination and prevents bacterial growth is urination. A recent review article on the subject found several contradictory studies on the effect of fluid intake on the risk of UTI.30 Although there is no definitive evidence that susceptibility to UTI is linked to fluid intake, adequate hydration may reduce the risk of recurrent infection.
Similarly, voiding shortly after sexual intercourse may prevent UTI. One case-control study found a modest protective effect in patients who voided after intercourse.31
Clinical recommendations
Given the low risk of these measures, it seems reasonable to recommend postcoital voiding and increased fluid intake to prevent recurrent UTI.
A focus on symptoms
Phenazopyridine, the chemical found in numerous OTC medications, such as Pyridium, AZO, and Uristat, was discovered by Swiss chemist Bernhard Joos in the 1950s. Its mechanism of action is still unclear, but approximately 65% of the oral dose is excreted by the kidneys, where it has a direct topical analgesic effect.32,33
Clinical recommendations
Patients should be warned that phenazopyridine will lead to orange urine discoloration.
The medication is generally well tolerated but should be used with caution in patients with acute renal failure, hemolytic anemia, or methemoglobinemia, as it may exacerbate these conditions.
Last words
Recurrent UTIs are common and impose a significant financial burden on our healthcare system. Although there are several antibiotic treatment options and dosing regimens available, increasing antibiotic resistance has made management of recurrent UTIs more difficult. Effective alternative treatments that reduce the reliance on antibiotics may minimize bacterial resistance and decrease the financial burden of this common condition.
CASE: Resolved
To reduce vaginal E. coli, the patient is started on vaginal estrogen cream. She is also advised to purchase cranberry tablets to help prevent future infections. Last, she is counseled about behavioral changes she can make and prescribed a short course of antibiotics to treat her culture-proven infection.
We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.
URINARY PROBLEMS?
CLICK HERE to access 9 articles about treating urinary incontinence and urinary tract infections, published in OBG MANAGEMENTin 2012.
1. Raz R, Stamm W. A controlled trial of intravaginal estriol in postmenopausal women with recurrent urinary tract infections. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(11):753-756.
2. Perrotta C, Aznar M, Mejia R, Albert X, Ng CW. Oestrogens for preventing recurrent urinary tract infection in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2:CD005131.-
3. Mayrer AR, Andriole VT. Urinary tract antiseptics. Med Clin North Am. 1982;66(1):199-208.
4. Jepson RG, Craig JC. A systematic review of the evidence for cranberries and blueberries in UTI prevention. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2007;51(6):738-745.
5. Salvatore S, Salvatore S, Cattoni E, et al. Urinary tract infections in women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;156(2):131-136.
6. Jepson RG, Craig JC. Cranberries for preventing urinary tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;1:CD001321.-
7. Stapleton AE, Dziura J, Hooton TM, et al. Recurrent urinary tract infection and urinary Escherichia coli in women ingesting cranberry juice daily: a randomized controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(2):143-150.
8. Barbosa-Cesnik C, Brown MB, Buxton M, Zhang L, DeBusscher J, Foxman B. Cranberry juice fails to prevent recurrent urinary tract infection: results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(1):23-30.
9. Beerepoot MAJ, Reit G, Nys S, et al. Cranberries vs antibiotics to prevent urinary tract infections. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(14):1270-1278.
10. McMurdo MET, Argo I, Phillips G, Daly F, Davey P. Cranberry or trimethoprim for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections? A randomized controlled trial in older women. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63(2):389-395.
11. Barrons R, Tassone D. Use of Lactobacillus probiotics for bacterial genitourinary infections in women: a review. Clinical Therapeutics. 2008;30(3):453-468.
12. Miller JL, Krieger JN. Urinary tract infections: cranberry juice underwear, and probiotics in the 21st century. Urol Clin N Am. 2002;29(3):695-699.
13. Osset J, Bartolome R, Garcia E, et al. Assessment of the capacity of Lactobacillus to inhibit the growth of uropathogens and block their adhesion to vaginal epithelial cells. J Infect Dis. 2001;183(3):485-491.
14. Stapleton AE, Au-Yeung M, Hooton TM, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of Lactobacillus crispatus probiotic given intravaginally for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(10):1212-1217.
15. Castello T, Girona L, Gomez MR, Mena Mur A, Garcia L. The possible value of ascorbic acid as a prophylactic agent for urinary tract infection. Spinal Cord. 1996;34(10):592-593.
16. Gleckman R, Alvarez S, Joubert DW, Matthews SJ. Drug therapy reviews: methenamine mandelate and methenamine hippurate. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1979;36(11):1509-1512.
17. Vainrub B, Musher DM. Lack of effect of methenamine in suppression of or prophylaxis against, chronic urinary tract infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977;12(5):625-629.
18. Lee BB, Simpson JM, Craig JC, Bhuta T. Methenamine hippurate for preventing urinary tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4:CD003265.-
19. Kevorkian CG, Merritt JL, Ilstrup DM. Methenamine mandelate with acidification: an effective urinary antiseptic in patients with neurogenic bladder. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984;59(8):523-529.
20. Wainwright M, Stanforth A, Jones R, Loughran C, Meegan K. Photoantimicrobials as a potential local approach to geriatric UTIs. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010;50(5):486-492.
21. Bannwart C, Hagmaier V, Straumann E, Hofer H, Buillemier JP, Trutishauser G. Modification of urinary pH through ascorbic acid. Helv Chir Acta. 1981;48(3-4):425-428.
22. Hetey SK, Kleinberg ML, Parker WD, Johnson EW. Effect of ascorbic acid on urine pH in patients with injured spinal cords. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1980;37(2):235-237.
23. Ochoa-Brust GJ, Fernandez AR, Villanueva-Ruiz GJ, et al. Daily intake of 100 mg ascorbic acid as urinary tract infection prophylactic agent during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(7):783-787.
24. Turi M, Turi E, Kotjalg S, Mikelsaar M. Influence of aqueous extracts of medicinal plants on surface hydrophobicity of Escherichia coli strains of different origin. APMIS. 1997;105(12):956-962.
25. Beaux D, Fleurentin J, Mortier F. Effect of extracts of Orthosiphon stamineus Benth Hieracium pilosellaL., Sambucus nigra L. and Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. in rats. Phytother Res. 1999;13(3):222-225.
26. Kubo M, Ito M, Nakata H, Matsuda H. Pharmacological studies on leaf of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. I. Combined effect of 50% methanolic extract from Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. (bearberry leaf) and prednisolone on immuno-inflammation [article in Japanese]. Yakugaku Zasshi. 1990;110(1):59-67.
27. Larsson B, Jonasson A, Fianu S. Prophylactic effect of UVA-E in women with recurrent cystitis: a preliminary report. Curr Ther Res. 1993;53(4):441-443.
28. Christenson JT, Thulesius D, Nazzal MM. The effect of forskolin on blood flow platelet metabolism, aggregation and ATP release. Vasa. 1995;24(1):56-61.
29. Bishop BL, Duncan MJ, Song J, Li G, Zaas D, Abraham SN. Cyclic AMP-regulated exocytosis of Escherichia coli from infected bladder epithelial cells. Nat Med. 2007;13(5):625-630.
30. Beetz R. Mild dehydration: a risk factor of urinary tract infection? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(Suppl 2):S52-58.
31. Foxman B, Chi JW. Health behavior and urinary tract infection in college-aged women. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(4):329-337.
32. Thomas BH, Whitehouse LW, Solomonraj G, Paul CJ. Excretion of phenazopyridine and its metabolites in the urine of humans rats, mice, and guinea pigs. J Pharm Sci. 1990;79(4):321-325.
33. Aizawa N, Wyndaele JJ. Effects of phenazopyridine on rat bladder primary afferent activity and comparison with lidocaine and acetaminophen. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(8):1445-1550.
The authors report no financial relationships relevant to this article.
CASE: Recurrent UTI and antibiotic resistance
A 53-year-old postmenopausal woman with a history of culture-proven recurrent Escherichia coli urinary tract infections (UTIs) presents to the clinic with symptoms of UTI. She was previously treated with a postcoital regimen of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, based on sensitivities identified by culture. A past work-up of her upper and lower urinary tract was negative. You send a catheterized specimen for culture; again, E. coli is identified as the pathogen but proves resistant to her current antibiotic regimen.
What treatment alternatives, aside from antibiotics, are available for this patient—and how might they affect resistance?
Increased antibiotic usage has led to greater bacterial resistance, which is perpetuated by clonal spread. Resistant strains of E. coli have been found in household members, suggesting host-host transmission as a mechanism for dissemination. Alternative treatments that reduce the use of antibiotics may minimize bacterial resistance and increase the efficacy of treatment. In the TABLE , we summarize alternative approaches to the treatment of recurrent UTI. We also describe a strategy to alleviate symptoms.
Alternatives to antibiotics in the treatment and prevention of recurrent UTI
| Category | Type | Examples and doses, if recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Vaginal estrogen | Conjugated estrogen cream Estradiol
| Premarin cream, 0.5–2 g vaginally twice weekly
|
| Nutritive agents | Cranberry juice Cranberry tablets Cystopurin Lactobacilli Blueberry products | Not recommended 1 tablet (300 to 400 mg, depending on manufacturer) twice daily Not recommended Vivag, EcoVag, 1 capsule daily by vagina for 5 days, then once weekly for 10 weeks Not recommended |
| Anti-infective drugs | Methenamine hippurate Methenamine mandelate Methylene blue | Urex or Hiprex, 1 g orally twice daily Mandelamine, 1 g orally 4 times daily Future therapy |
| Urinary acidifiers | Vitamin C/ascorbic acid | 1–3 g orally 3–4 times daily |
| Herbal remedies | Uva ursi Forskolin | Not recommended for long-term use Not recommended |
| Behavioral changes | Adequate hydration Postcoital voiding |
Vaginal estrogen is the only proven alternative to antibiotics for postmenopausal women
A lack of estrogen is a risk factor for UTI and is associated with atrophic mucosa, leading to decreased colonization with lactobacilli, increased vaginal pH, and E. coli colonization.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravaginal estriol cream versus placebo in 93 postmenopausal women found a significant decrease in the rate of UTI among women who used the cream.1 After 8 months of follow-up, the incidence of UTI was 0.5 vs 5.9 episodes per patient-year (P <.001). Interestingly, all pretreatment cultures were negative for lactobacilli. One month after treatment, 61% of women in the estriol group were culture-positive for lactobacilli, compared with 0% of the placebo group.1
A 2008 Cochrane review of nine studies concluded that vaginal estrogen reduces the number of UTIs in postmenopausal women, with variation based on the type of estrogen and duration of use.2
Adverse effects are mild
Twenty-eight percent of the estriol group in the randomized trial described above withdrew from treatment, with 20% citing local side effects, including vaginal irritation, burning, or itching—all of which were mild and self-limited.1 Other possible adverse effects include breast tenderness, vaginal bleeding or spotting, and discharge.2
Clinical recommendations
Given the efficacy of this therapy, we recommend topical estrogen for postmenopausal patients with recurrent UTIs.
Cranberry juice may reduce UTI, but many patients withdraw
from treatment
Cranberries belong to the Vaccinium species, which contains all flavonoids, including anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins. It was previously thought that the acidification of urine produced an antibacterial effect, but several trials have documented no change in urine levels of hippuric acid when cranberry products are given, with no acidification of the urine.3 Current theory suggests that cranberries prevent bacteria from adhering to the uroepithelial cells of the walls of the bladder, by blocking expression of E. coli’s adhesion molecule, P. fimbriae, so that bacteria are unable to penetrate the mucosal surface.4,5 The major benefit of cranberry products over antibiotic prophylaxis is that they do not have the potential for resistance.4
A 2008 Cochrane review concluded that cranberry juice may reduce symptomatic UTIs, particularly among young, sexually active women—but there is a high rate of withdrawal from treatment.6 The optimal method of administration and dose remain unclear. In contrast, two recent randomized, controlled trials—published after the Cochrane review—found no difference in the rate of recurrent UTI in premenopausal women.7,8 Adverse effects in these two trials included constipation, heartburn, loose stools, vaginal itching and dryness, and migraines. Of note, there was no statistical difference in side effects between the cranberry and placebo groups.7
Vaccinium tablets may be protective in older women
Cranberry extracts of 500 mg to 1,000 mg daily have been compared with antimicrobial prophylaxis in two randomized, double-blind, controlled trials. The trials demonstrated mixed benefits. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was associated with a lower rate of UTI in younger women, compared with cranberry extracts alone (P=.02), while cranberry extracts were slightly more effective than trimethoprim alone in older women.9,10 Cranberry tablets were not associated with bacterial resistance, were cheaper, and were viewed as a more natural option. The interventions were equally well tolerated.
Overall efficacy of cranberry tablets is unclear. Side effects, albeit mild, included gastrointestinal disturbances, vaginal complaints, and rash or urticaria. There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse effects between antimicrobial treatment and cranberry tablets.9
Cystopurin has not been studied
Cystopurin is an over-the-counter (OTC) tablet containing cranberry extract and potassium citrate that is taken three times daily (3 g/dose) for 2 days. Interestingly, although a proposed mechanism for the efficacy of vitamin C and cranberry juice has been a reduction of pH, potassium citrate is an alkalizing agent that is reported to relieve burning and reduce urinary urgency and frequency. No studies have assessed this medication in the treatment of a UTI or its symptoms.
Clinical recommendations
The evidence is mixed on the use of cranberry products to reduce recurrent UTI. However, given the limited side effects associated with these products, we offer cranberry tablets to patients who have recurrent UTIs who are interested in a more natural alternative.
We generally do not recommend cranberry juice because the added fluid volume tends to exacerbate frequency and urgency symptoms.
Lactobacilli suppositories may benefit
postmenopausal women
Lactobacilli are fastidious gram-positive rods and are usually the dominant component of the vaginal flora.11 They prevent colonization and infection by more virulent bacteria by competing for adhesion receptors and nutrients as well as producing antimicrobial substances such as hydrogen peroxide and lactic acid. A decrease in lactobacilli leaves the urinary tract susceptible to infectious organisms that may colonize the vaginal mucosa and increase the risk of recurrent UTI.12-14
A 2008 review of randomized, controlled trials of oral lactobacilli and UTI was inconclusive, due to inconsistent dosing strategies and small sample sizes.15 A 2011 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of Lactin-V, a lactobacilli vaginal suppository, found that it reduced the rate of recurrent UTI. Lactin-V contains a hydrogen-peroxide–producing Lactobacillus crispatus developed as a probiotic that was determined to be safe and tolerable as a vaginal suppository in a phase 1 trial.16 The phase 2 trial enrolled 100 young premenopausal women with a history of recurrent UTI who took either Lactin-V or placebo daily for 5 days, then weekly for 10 weeks. Women in the Lactin-V group who had high levels of L. crispatus colonization experienced a significant reduction in the rate of UTI (15% vs 27% in the placebo group), but the effect did not reach statistical significance.14
Little difference in adverse effects
Adverse effects were reported among 56% of patients who received Lactin-V versus 50% of those given placebo. The most common of these were vaginal discharge, itching, and moderate abdominal discomfort.14 Although lactobacillus can potentially promote UTI, this phenomenon is rare.11
Regrettably, Lactin-V is not currently available in the United States. However, there are other lactobacilli vaginal suppositories on the market ( TABLE ). Given the low risk associated with their use, they should be considered as an alternative for patients who cannot or will not use estrogen.
Clinical recommendations
Probiotics such as lactobacilli are categorized as “dietary supplements”; as such, they are not regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration. We recommend the use of lactobacilli suppositories in postmenopausal women who have a contraindication to (or prefer to avoid) vaginal estrogen.
Skip blueberry products for now
Like cranberries, blueberries belong to the Vaccinium species and are thought to interfere with bacterial adhesion to the walls of the bladder. One in vitro trial suggests that blueberries also have antiproliferation effects, although no clinical studies have been performed to date to further investigate safety or efficacy.4 Consequently, we do not recommend use of these products.
Methenamine salts may benefit some populations
These anti-infective agents, including methenamine hippurate and methenamine mandelate, often are used to prevent UTI. They are found in combination OTC medications, such as Prosed DS and Urelle. Methenamine salts are bacteriostatic to all urinary tract pathogens due to their production of formaldehyde.3,16
Although methenamine produces varying concentrations of formaldehyde, depending on the acidity of the urine, there is no evidence that acidified urine enhances methenamine’s effects.16
Advantages of methenamine include the fact that it produces no changes in gut flora, poses no risk for antimicrobial resistance, and has low toxicity. It also is low in cost.17
Methenamine is contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency or severe hepatic disease.
Adverse reactions are generally mild and include gastrointestinal disturbances, skin rashes, dysuria, and microscopic hematuria.16
Methenamine hippurate
A 2007 Cochrane review, deemed up to date in 2010, analyzed 13 randomized, controlled trials involving 2,032 participants. Subgroup analyses suggested that methenamine hippurate may be of some benefit to patients without renal tract abnormalities; these patients experienced significantly reduced symptoms after short-term treatment of 1 week or less.
Patients with spinal injury do not appear to benefit from treatment, according to a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial by Lee and colleagues.18
Methenamine mandelate
This agent is commonly used to prevent recurrent UTI, although there is a paucity of randomized, controlled trials to support its use. One such trial in patients with neurogenic bladder found that methenamine mandelate with acidification was superior to placebo (P <.02) for preventing UTI.19 Beyond this population, however, it’s difficult to assess methenamine’s efficacy in the prevention of recurrent UTI.
Methylene blue may be useful in the elderly
Methylene blue is a light-activated compound described as “photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy” (PACT). Once illuminated, it becomes a bactericide, causing excitation of electrons followed by one of two reactions:
- reduction oxidation
- formation of a labile singlet oxygen and then oxidation.
This makes resistance unlikely.
In an in vitro study, methylene blue was as effective as levofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumonia, Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus, and Staphylococcus aureus when illuminated.
Potential benefits of this mode of treatment include local exposure and no drug interactions.
We suggest that methylene blue be placed and illuminated with a special catheter that would target UTI in the elderly population, among whom 52% of UTIs are associated with use of catheters.20 In vivo effects, adverse effects, and cost are not known, which limits current applicability of this compound.
Vitamin C may reduce UTI in pregnancy
The proposed mechanism for the efficacy of vitamin C for the treatment of UTI is the acidification of urine, which is believed to reduce the proliferation of bacteria. However, several studies have shown that vitamin C, at various doses, does not reliably reduce urine pH.15,21,22 Nonetheless, ascorbic acid was tested for its effect on UTI prevention during pregnancy.
In a single-blind trial, 110 pregnant women were divided into two groups (55 in each group):
- One group received ferrous sulfate (200 mg), folic acid (5 mg), and vitamin C (100 mg) daily for 3 months
- The other received ferrous sulfate (200 mg) and folic acid (5 mg) daily for 3 months.
Urine was cultured monthly. The incidence of UTI was significantly lower in the group receiving vitamin C (12.7%), compared with the control group (29.1%) (P=.03; odds ratio [OR], 0.35).23
Uva ursi may have a prophylactic effect
Uva ursi (UVA-E) is one of the most commonly used herbal supplements for treatment of UTI. The crude extract from Bearberry or Arctostaphylos uva-ursi has been shown to act as an antimicrobial by decreasing bacterial adherence.24 In addition, investigators have found the extract to have diuretic and anti-inflammatory properties.25,26 However, few studies have explored its efficacy. One randomized, controlled trial that included 57 women (30 allocated to UVA-E and 27 to placebo) found a statistically significant reduction in the rate of recurrence at 1 year among women taking UVA-E, compared with those who did not.27
Note that the women in this trial were given UVA-E for 1 month only. Long-term use of this herb has not been studied and may cause liver damage.
In a mouse model, forskolin reduced urinary-tract E. coli
This herb is derived from Indian coleus (Coleus forskohlii), a member of the mint family. It has been used primarily for its antiasthmatic, spasmolytic, and antihypertensive effects. It is believed to activate adenylate cyclase, increasing intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) concentrations and activating a number of key enzymatic pathways.28
The findings of a recent observational study have spurred the use of forskolin in the treatment of recurrent UTI.29 In the study, conducted on mice, when forskolin was injected into the bladder, intracellular E. coli decreased.
It is theorized that the incorporation of bacteria into intracellular vesicles of the bladder prevents exposure to antibiotics. When combined with an antibiotic, forskolin may increase bacterial elimination and thus lower the risk of recurrent infection. However, no randomized trials have evaluated the efficacy of this treatment.
Patients who are already taking antihypertensive medications should be cautious when using this herb, as it may lead to a drop in blood pressure.
Behavior changes are risk-free
One of the natural mechanisms that promotes bacterial elimination and prevents bacterial growth is urination. A recent review article on the subject found several contradictory studies on the effect of fluid intake on the risk of UTI.30 Although there is no definitive evidence that susceptibility to UTI is linked to fluid intake, adequate hydration may reduce the risk of recurrent infection.
Similarly, voiding shortly after sexual intercourse may prevent UTI. One case-control study found a modest protective effect in patients who voided after intercourse.31
Clinical recommendations
Given the low risk of these measures, it seems reasonable to recommend postcoital voiding and increased fluid intake to prevent recurrent UTI.
A focus on symptoms
Phenazopyridine, the chemical found in numerous OTC medications, such as Pyridium, AZO, and Uristat, was discovered by Swiss chemist Bernhard Joos in the 1950s. Its mechanism of action is still unclear, but approximately 65% of the oral dose is excreted by the kidneys, where it has a direct topical analgesic effect.32,33
Clinical recommendations
Patients should be warned that phenazopyridine will lead to orange urine discoloration.
The medication is generally well tolerated but should be used with caution in patients with acute renal failure, hemolytic anemia, or methemoglobinemia, as it may exacerbate these conditions.
Last words
Recurrent UTIs are common and impose a significant financial burden on our healthcare system. Although there are several antibiotic treatment options and dosing regimens available, increasing antibiotic resistance has made management of recurrent UTIs more difficult. Effective alternative treatments that reduce the reliance on antibiotics may minimize bacterial resistance and decrease the financial burden of this common condition.
CASE: Resolved
To reduce vaginal E. coli, the patient is started on vaginal estrogen cream. She is also advised to purchase cranberry tablets to help prevent future infections. Last, she is counseled about behavioral changes she can make and prescribed a short course of antibiotics to treat her culture-proven infection.
We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.
URINARY PROBLEMS?
CLICK HERE to access 9 articles about treating urinary incontinence and urinary tract infections, published in OBG MANAGEMENTin 2012.
The authors report no financial relationships relevant to this article.
CASE: Recurrent UTI and antibiotic resistance
A 53-year-old postmenopausal woman with a history of culture-proven recurrent Escherichia coli urinary tract infections (UTIs) presents to the clinic with symptoms of UTI. She was previously treated with a postcoital regimen of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, based on sensitivities identified by culture. A past work-up of her upper and lower urinary tract was negative. You send a catheterized specimen for culture; again, E. coli is identified as the pathogen but proves resistant to her current antibiotic regimen.
What treatment alternatives, aside from antibiotics, are available for this patient—and how might they affect resistance?
Increased antibiotic usage has led to greater bacterial resistance, which is perpetuated by clonal spread. Resistant strains of E. coli have been found in household members, suggesting host-host transmission as a mechanism for dissemination. Alternative treatments that reduce the use of antibiotics may minimize bacterial resistance and increase the efficacy of treatment. In the TABLE , we summarize alternative approaches to the treatment of recurrent UTI. We also describe a strategy to alleviate symptoms.
Alternatives to antibiotics in the treatment and prevention of recurrent UTI
| Category | Type | Examples and doses, if recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Vaginal estrogen | Conjugated estrogen cream Estradiol
| Premarin cream, 0.5–2 g vaginally twice weekly
|
| Nutritive agents | Cranberry juice Cranberry tablets Cystopurin Lactobacilli Blueberry products | Not recommended 1 tablet (300 to 400 mg, depending on manufacturer) twice daily Not recommended Vivag, EcoVag, 1 capsule daily by vagina for 5 days, then once weekly for 10 weeks Not recommended |
| Anti-infective drugs | Methenamine hippurate Methenamine mandelate Methylene blue | Urex or Hiprex, 1 g orally twice daily Mandelamine, 1 g orally 4 times daily Future therapy |
| Urinary acidifiers | Vitamin C/ascorbic acid | 1–3 g orally 3–4 times daily |
| Herbal remedies | Uva ursi Forskolin | Not recommended for long-term use Not recommended |
| Behavioral changes | Adequate hydration Postcoital voiding |
Vaginal estrogen is the only proven alternative to antibiotics for postmenopausal women
A lack of estrogen is a risk factor for UTI and is associated with atrophic mucosa, leading to decreased colonization with lactobacilli, increased vaginal pH, and E. coli colonization.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravaginal estriol cream versus placebo in 93 postmenopausal women found a significant decrease in the rate of UTI among women who used the cream.1 After 8 months of follow-up, the incidence of UTI was 0.5 vs 5.9 episodes per patient-year (P <.001). Interestingly, all pretreatment cultures were negative for lactobacilli. One month after treatment, 61% of women in the estriol group were culture-positive for lactobacilli, compared with 0% of the placebo group.1
A 2008 Cochrane review of nine studies concluded that vaginal estrogen reduces the number of UTIs in postmenopausal women, with variation based on the type of estrogen and duration of use.2
Adverse effects are mild
Twenty-eight percent of the estriol group in the randomized trial described above withdrew from treatment, with 20% citing local side effects, including vaginal irritation, burning, or itching—all of which were mild and self-limited.1 Other possible adverse effects include breast tenderness, vaginal bleeding or spotting, and discharge.2
Clinical recommendations
Given the efficacy of this therapy, we recommend topical estrogen for postmenopausal patients with recurrent UTIs.
Cranberry juice may reduce UTI, but many patients withdraw
from treatment
Cranberries belong to the Vaccinium species, which contains all flavonoids, including anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins. It was previously thought that the acidification of urine produced an antibacterial effect, but several trials have documented no change in urine levels of hippuric acid when cranberry products are given, with no acidification of the urine.3 Current theory suggests that cranberries prevent bacteria from adhering to the uroepithelial cells of the walls of the bladder, by blocking expression of E. coli’s adhesion molecule, P. fimbriae, so that bacteria are unable to penetrate the mucosal surface.4,5 The major benefit of cranberry products over antibiotic prophylaxis is that they do not have the potential for resistance.4
A 2008 Cochrane review concluded that cranberry juice may reduce symptomatic UTIs, particularly among young, sexually active women—but there is a high rate of withdrawal from treatment.6 The optimal method of administration and dose remain unclear. In contrast, two recent randomized, controlled trials—published after the Cochrane review—found no difference in the rate of recurrent UTI in premenopausal women.7,8 Adverse effects in these two trials included constipation, heartburn, loose stools, vaginal itching and dryness, and migraines. Of note, there was no statistical difference in side effects between the cranberry and placebo groups.7
Vaccinium tablets may be protective in older women
Cranberry extracts of 500 mg to 1,000 mg daily have been compared with antimicrobial prophylaxis in two randomized, double-blind, controlled trials. The trials demonstrated mixed benefits. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was associated with a lower rate of UTI in younger women, compared with cranberry extracts alone (P=.02), while cranberry extracts were slightly more effective than trimethoprim alone in older women.9,10 Cranberry tablets were not associated with bacterial resistance, were cheaper, and were viewed as a more natural option. The interventions were equally well tolerated.
Overall efficacy of cranberry tablets is unclear. Side effects, albeit mild, included gastrointestinal disturbances, vaginal complaints, and rash or urticaria. There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse effects between antimicrobial treatment and cranberry tablets.9
Cystopurin has not been studied
Cystopurin is an over-the-counter (OTC) tablet containing cranberry extract and potassium citrate that is taken three times daily (3 g/dose) for 2 days. Interestingly, although a proposed mechanism for the efficacy of vitamin C and cranberry juice has been a reduction of pH, potassium citrate is an alkalizing agent that is reported to relieve burning and reduce urinary urgency and frequency. No studies have assessed this medication in the treatment of a UTI or its symptoms.
Clinical recommendations
The evidence is mixed on the use of cranberry products to reduce recurrent UTI. However, given the limited side effects associated with these products, we offer cranberry tablets to patients who have recurrent UTIs who are interested in a more natural alternative.
We generally do not recommend cranberry juice because the added fluid volume tends to exacerbate frequency and urgency symptoms.
Lactobacilli suppositories may benefit
postmenopausal women
Lactobacilli are fastidious gram-positive rods and are usually the dominant component of the vaginal flora.11 They prevent colonization and infection by more virulent bacteria by competing for adhesion receptors and nutrients as well as producing antimicrobial substances such as hydrogen peroxide and lactic acid. A decrease in lactobacilli leaves the urinary tract susceptible to infectious organisms that may colonize the vaginal mucosa and increase the risk of recurrent UTI.12-14
A 2008 review of randomized, controlled trials of oral lactobacilli and UTI was inconclusive, due to inconsistent dosing strategies and small sample sizes.15 A 2011 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of Lactin-V, a lactobacilli vaginal suppository, found that it reduced the rate of recurrent UTI. Lactin-V contains a hydrogen-peroxide–producing Lactobacillus crispatus developed as a probiotic that was determined to be safe and tolerable as a vaginal suppository in a phase 1 trial.16 The phase 2 trial enrolled 100 young premenopausal women with a history of recurrent UTI who took either Lactin-V or placebo daily for 5 days, then weekly for 10 weeks. Women in the Lactin-V group who had high levels of L. crispatus colonization experienced a significant reduction in the rate of UTI (15% vs 27% in the placebo group), but the effect did not reach statistical significance.14
Little difference in adverse effects
Adverse effects were reported among 56% of patients who received Lactin-V versus 50% of those given placebo. The most common of these were vaginal discharge, itching, and moderate abdominal discomfort.14 Although lactobacillus can potentially promote UTI, this phenomenon is rare.11
Regrettably, Lactin-V is not currently available in the United States. However, there are other lactobacilli vaginal suppositories on the market ( TABLE ). Given the low risk associated with their use, they should be considered as an alternative for patients who cannot or will not use estrogen.
Clinical recommendations
Probiotics such as lactobacilli are categorized as “dietary supplements”; as such, they are not regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration. We recommend the use of lactobacilli suppositories in postmenopausal women who have a contraindication to (or prefer to avoid) vaginal estrogen.
Skip blueberry products for now
Like cranberries, blueberries belong to the Vaccinium species and are thought to interfere with bacterial adhesion to the walls of the bladder. One in vitro trial suggests that blueberries also have antiproliferation effects, although no clinical studies have been performed to date to further investigate safety or efficacy.4 Consequently, we do not recommend use of these products.
Methenamine salts may benefit some populations
These anti-infective agents, including methenamine hippurate and methenamine mandelate, often are used to prevent UTI. They are found in combination OTC medications, such as Prosed DS and Urelle. Methenamine salts are bacteriostatic to all urinary tract pathogens due to their production of formaldehyde.3,16
Although methenamine produces varying concentrations of formaldehyde, depending on the acidity of the urine, there is no evidence that acidified urine enhances methenamine’s effects.16
Advantages of methenamine include the fact that it produces no changes in gut flora, poses no risk for antimicrobial resistance, and has low toxicity. It also is low in cost.17
Methenamine is contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency or severe hepatic disease.
Adverse reactions are generally mild and include gastrointestinal disturbances, skin rashes, dysuria, and microscopic hematuria.16
Methenamine hippurate
A 2007 Cochrane review, deemed up to date in 2010, analyzed 13 randomized, controlled trials involving 2,032 participants. Subgroup analyses suggested that methenamine hippurate may be of some benefit to patients without renal tract abnormalities; these patients experienced significantly reduced symptoms after short-term treatment of 1 week or less.
Patients with spinal injury do not appear to benefit from treatment, according to a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial by Lee and colleagues.18
Methenamine mandelate
This agent is commonly used to prevent recurrent UTI, although there is a paucity of randomized, controlled trials to support its use. One such trial in patients with neurogenic bladder found that methenamine mandelate with acidification was superior to placebo (P <.02) for preventing UTI.19 Beyond this population, however, it’s difficult to assess methenamine’s efficacy in the prevention of recurrent UTI.
Methylene blue may be useful in the elderly
Methylene blue is a light-activated compound described as “photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy” (PACT). Once illuminated, it becomes a bactericide, causing excitation of electrons followed by one of two reactions:
- reduction oxidation
- formation of a labile singlet oxygen and then oxidation.
This makes resistance unlikely.
In an in vitro study, methylene blue was as effective as levofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumonia, Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus, and Staphylococcus aureus when illuminated.
Potential benefits of this mode of treatment include local exposure and no drug interactions.
We suggest that methylene blue be placed and illuminated with a special catheter that would target UTI in the elderly population, among whom 52% of UTIs are associated with use of catheters.20 In vivo effects, adverse effects, and cost are not known, which limits current applicability of this compound.
Vitamin C may reduce UTI in pregnancy
The proposed mechanism for the efficacy of vitamin C for the treatment of UTI is the acidification of urine, which is believed to reduce the proliferation of bacteria. However, several studies have shown that vitamin C, at various doses, does not reliably reduce urine pH.15,21,22 Nonetheless, ascorbic acid was tested for its effect on UTI prevention during pregnancy.
In a single-blind trial, 110 pregnant women were divided into two groups (55 in each group):
- One group received ferrous sulfate (200 mg), folic acid (5 mg), and vitamin C (100 mg) daily for 3 months
- The other received ferrous sulfate (200 mg) and folic acid (5 mg) daily for 3 months.
Urine was cultured monthly. The incidence of UTI was significantly lower in the group receiving vitamin C (12.7%), compared with the control group (29.1%) (P=.03; odds ratio [OR], 0.35).23
Uva ursi may have a prophylactic effect
Uva ursi (UVA-E) is one of the most commonly used herbal supplements for treatment of UTI. The crude extract from Bearberry or Arctostaphylos uva-ursi has been shown to act as an antimicrobial by decreasing bacterial adherence.24 In addition, investigators have found the extract to have diuretic and anti-inflammatory properties.25,26 However, few studies have explored its efficacy. One randomized, controlled trial that included 57 women (30 allocated to UVA-E and 27 to placebo) found a statistically significant reduction in the rate of recurrence at 1 year among women taking UVA-E, compared with those who did not.27
Note that the women in this trial were given UVA-E for 1 month only. Long-term use of this herb has not been studied and may cause liver damage.
In a mouse model, forskolin reduced urinary-tract E. coli
This herb is derived from Indian coleus (Coleus forskohlii), a member of the mint family. It has been used primarily for its antiasthmatic, spasmolytic, and antihypertensive effects. It is believed to activate adenylate cyclase, increasing intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) concentrations and activating a number of key enzymatic pathways.28
The findings of a recent observational study have spurred the use of forskolin in the treatment of recurrent UTI.29 In the study, conducted on mice, when forskolin was injected into the bladder, intracellular E. coli decreased.
It is theorized that the incorporation of bacteria into intracellular vesicles of the bladder prevents exposure to antibiotics. When combined with an antibiotic, forskolin may increase bacterial elimination and thus lower the risk of recurrent infection. However, no randomized trials have evaluated the efficacy of this treatment.
Patients who are already taking antihypertensive medications should be cautious when using this herb, as it may lead to a drop in blood pressure.
Behavior changes are risk-free
One of the natural mechanisms that promotes bacterial elimination and prevents bacterial growth is urination. A recent review article on the subject found several contradictory studies on the effect of fluid intake on the risk of UTI.30 Although there is no definitive evidence that susceptibility to UTI is linked to fluid intake, adequate hydration may reduce the risk of recurrent infection.
Similarly, voiding shortly after sexual intercourse may prevent UTI. One case-control study found a modest protective effect in patients who voided after intercourse.31
Clinical recommendations
Given the low risk of these measures, it seems reasonable to recommend postcoital voiding and increased fluid intake to prevent recurrent UTI.
A focus on symptoms
Phenazopyridine, the chemical found in numerous OTC medications, such as Pyridium, AZO, and Uristat, was discovered by Swiss chemist Bernhard Joos in the 1950s. Its mechanism of action is still unclear, but approximately 65% of the oral dose is excreted by the kidneys, where it has a direct topical analgesic effect.32,33
Clinical recommendations
Patients should be warned that phenazopyridine will lead to orange urine discoloration.
The medication is generally well tolerated but should be used with caution in patients with acute renal failure, hemolytic anemia, or methemoglobinemia, as it may exacerbate these conditions.
Last words
Recurrent UTIs are common and impose a significant financial burden on our healthcare system. Although there are several antibiotic treatment options and dosing regimens available, increasing antibiotic resistance has made management of recurrent UTIs more difficult. Effective alternative treatments that reduce the reliance on antibiotics may minimize bacterial resistance and decrease the financial burden of this common condition.
CASE: Resolved
To reduce vaginal E. coli, the patient is started on vaginal estrogen cream. She is also advised to purchase cranberry tablets to help prevent future infections. Last, she is counseled about behavioral changes she can make and prescribed a short course of antibiotics to treat her culture-proven infection.
We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.
URINARY PROBLEMS?
CLICK HERE to access 9 articles about treating urinary incontinence and urinary tract infections, published in OBG MANAGEMENTin 2012.
1. Raz R, Stamm W. A controlled trial of intravaginal estriol in postmenopausal women with recurrent urinary tract infections. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(11):753-756.
2. Perrotta C, Aznar M, Mejia R, Albert X, Ng CW. Oestrogens for preventing recurrent urinary tract infection in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2:CD005131.-
3. Mayrer AR, Andriole VT. Urinary tract antiseptics. Med Clin North Am. 1982;66(1):199-208.
4. Jepson RG, Craig JC. A systematic review of the evidence for cranberries and blueberries in UTI prevention. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2007;51(6):738-745.
5. Salvatore S, Salvatore S, Cattoni E, et al. Urinary tract infections in women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;156(2):131-136.
6. Jepson RG, Craig JC. Cranberries for preventing urinary tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;1:CD001321.-
7. Stapleton AE, Dziura J, Hooton TM, et al. Recurrent urinary tract infection and urinary Escherichia coli in women ingesting cranberry juice daily: a randomized controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(2):143-150.
8. Barbosa-Cesnik C, Brown MB, Buxton M, Zhang L, DeBusscher J, Foxman B. Cranberry juice fails to prevent recurrent urinary tract infection: results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(1):23-30.
9. Beerepoot MAJ, Reit G, Nys S, et al. Cranberries vs antibiotics to prevent urinary tract infections. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(14):1270-1278.
10. McMurdo MET, Argo I, Phillips G, Daly F, Davey P. Cranberry or trimethoprim for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections? A randomized controlled trial in older women. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63(2):389-395.
11. Barrons R, Tassone D. Use of Lactobacillus probiotics for bacterial genitourinary infections in women: a review. Clinical Therapeutics. 2008;30(3):453-468.
12. Miller JL, Krieger JN. Urinary tract infections: cranberry juice underwear, and probiotics in the 21st century. Urol Clin N Am. 2002;29(3):695-699.
13. Osset J, Bartolome R, Garcia E, et al. Assessment of the capacity of Lactobacillus to inhibit the growth of uropathogens and block their adhesion to vaginal epithelial cells. J Infect Dis. 2001;183(3):485-491.
14. Stapleton AE, Au-Yeung M, Hooton TM, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of Lactobacillus crispatus probiotic given intravaginally for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(10):1212-1217.
15. Castello T, Girona L, Gomez MR, Mena Mur A, Garcia L. The possible value of ascorbic acid as a prophylactic agent for urinary tract infection. Spinal Cord. 1996;34(10):592-593.
16. Gleckman R, Alvarez S, Joubert DW, Matthews SJ. Drug therapy reviews: methenamine mandelate and methenamine hippurate. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1979;36(11):1509-1512.
17. Vainrub B, Musher DM. Lack of effect of methenamine in suppression of or prophylaxis against, chronic urinary tract infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977;12(5):625-629.
18. Lee BB, Simpson JM, Craig JC, Bhuta T. Methenamine hippurate for preventing urinary tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4:CD003265.-
19. Kevorkian CG, Merritt JL, Ilstrup DM. Methenamine mandelate with acidification: an effective urinary antiseptic in patients with neurogenic bladder. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984;59(8):523-529.
20. Wainwright M, Stanforth A, Jones R, Loughran C, Meegan K. Photoantimicrobials as a potential local approach to geriatric UTIs. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010;50(5):486-492.
21. Bannwart C, Hagmaier V, Straumann E, Hofer H, Buillemier JP, Trutishauser G. Modification of urinary pH through ascorbic acid. Helv Chir Acta. 1981;48(3-4):425-428.
22. Hetey SK, Kleinberg ML, Parker WD, Johnson EW. Effect of ascorbic acid on urine pH in patients with injured spinal cords. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1980;37(2):235-237.
23. Ochoa-Brust GJ, Fernandez AR, Villanueva-Ruiz GJ, et al. Daily intake of 100 mg ascorbic acid as urinary tract infection prophylactic agent during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(7):783-787.
24. Turi M, Turi E, Kotjalg S, Mikelsaar M. Influence of aqueous extracts of medicinal plants on surface hydrophobicity of Escherichia coli strains of different origin. APMIS. 1997;105(12):956-962.
25. Beaux D, Fleurentin J, Mortier F. Effect of extracts of Orthosiphon stamineus Benth Hieracium pilosellaL., Sambucus nigra L. and Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. in rats. Phytother Res. 1999;13(3):222-225.
26. Kubo M, Ito M, Nakata H, Matsuda H. Pharmacological studies on leaf of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. I. Combined effect of 50% methanolic extract from Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. (bearberry leaf) and prednisolone on immuno-inflammation [article in Japanese]. Yakugaku Zasshi. 1990;110(1):59-67.
27. Larsson B, Jonasson A, Fianu S. Prophylactic effect of UVA-E in women with recurrent cystitis: a preliminary report. Curr Ther Res. 1993;53(4):441-443.
28. Christenson JT, Thulesius D, Nazzal MM. The effect of forskolin on blood flow platelet metabolism, aggregation and ATP release. Vasa. 1995;24(1):56-61.
29. Bishop BL, Duncan MJ, Song J, Li G, Zaas D, Abraham SN. Cyclic AMP-regulated exocytosis of Escherichia coli from infected bladder epithelial cells. Nat Med. 2007;13(5):625-630.
30. Beetz R. Mild dehydration: a risk factor of urinary tract infection? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(Suppl 2):S52-58.
31. Foxman B, Chi JW. Health behavior and urinary tract infection in college-aged women. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(4):329-337.
32. Thomas BH, Whitehouse LW, Solomonraj G, Paul CJ. Excretion of phenazopyridine and its metabolites in the urine of humans rats, mice, and guinea pigs. J Pharm Sci. 1990;79(4):321-325.
33. Aizawa N, Wyndaele JJ. Effects of phenazopyridine on rat bladder primary afferent activity and comparison with lidocaine and acetaminophen. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(8):1445-1550.
1. Raz R, Stamm W. A controlled trial of intravaginal estriol in postmenopausal women with recurrent urinary tract infections. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(11):753-756.
2. Perrotta C, Aznar M, Mejia R, Albert X, Ng CW. Oestrogens for preventing recurrent urinary tract infection in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2:CD005131.-
3. Mayrer AR, Andriole VT. Urinary tract antiseptics. Med Clin North Am. 1982;66(1):199-208.
4. Jepson RG, Craig JC. A systematic review of the evidence for cranberries and blueberries in UTI prevention. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2007;51(6):738-745.
5. Salvatore S, Salvatore S, Cattoni E, et al. Urinary tract infections in women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;156(2):131-136.
6. Jepson RG, Craig JC. Cranberries for preventing urinary tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;1:CD001321.-
7. Stapleton AE, Dziura J, Hooton TM, et al. Recurrent urinary tract infection and urinary Escherichia coli in women ingesting cranberry juice daily: a randomized controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(2):143-150.
8. Barbosa-Cesnik C, Brown MB, Buxton M, Zhang L, DeBusscher J, Foxman B. Cranberry juice fails to prevent recurrent urinary tract infection: results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(1):23-30.
9. Beerepoot MAJ, Reit G, Nys S, et al. Cranberries vs antibiotics to prevent urinary tract infections. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(14):1270-1278.
10. McMurdo MET, Argo I, Phillips G, Daly F, Davey P. Cranberry or trimethoprim for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections? A randomized controlled trial in older women. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63(2):389-395.
11. Barrons R, Tassone D. Use of Lactobacillus probiotics for bacterial genitourinary infections in women: a review. Clinical Therapeutics. 2008;30(3):453-468.
12. Miller JL, Krieger JN. Urinary tract infections: cranberry juice underwear, and probiotics in the 21st century. Urol Clin N Am. 2002;29(3):695-699.
13. Osset J, Bartolome R, Garcia E, et al. Assessment of the capacity of Lactobacillus to inhibit the growth of uropathogens and block their adhesion to vaginal epithelial cells. J Infect Dis. 2001;183(3):485-491.
14. Stapleton AE, Au-Yeung M, Hooton TM, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of Lactobacillus crispatus probiotic given intravaginally for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(10):1212-1217.
15. Castello T, Girona L, Gomez MR, Mena Mur A, Garcia L. The possible value of ascorbic acid as a prophylactic agent for urinary tract infection. Spinal Cord. 1996;34(10):592-593.
16. Gleckman R, Alvarez S, Joubert DW, Matthews SJ. Drug therapy reviews: methenamine mandelate and methenamine hippurate. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1979;36(11):1509-1512.
17. Vainrub B, Musher DM. Lack of effect of methenamine in suppression of or prophylaxis against, chronic urinary tract infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977;12(5):625-629.
18. Lee BB, Simpson JM, Craig JC, Bhuta T. Methenamine hippurate for preventing urinary tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4:CD003265.-
19. Kevorkian CG, Merritt JL, Ilstrup DM. Methenamine mandelate with acidification: an effective urinary antiseptic in patients with neurogenic bladder. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984;59(8):523-529.
20. Wainwright M, Stanforth A, Jones R, Loughran C, Meegan K. Photoantimicrobials as a potential local approach to geriatric UTIs. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010;50(5):486-492.
21. Bannwart C, Hagmaier V, Straumann E, Hofer H, Buillemier JP, Trutishauser G. Modification of urinary pH through ascorbic acid. Helv Chir Acta. 1981;48(3-4):425-428.
22. Hetey SK, Kleinberg ML, Parker WD, Johnson EW. Effect of ascorbic acid on urine pH in patients with injured spinal cords. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1980;37(2):235-237.
23. Ochoa-Brust GJ, Fernandez AR, Villanueva-Ruiz GJ, et al. Daily intake of 100 mg ascorbic acid as urinary tract infection prophylactic agent during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(7):783-787.
24. Turi M, Turi E, Kotjalg S, Mikelsaar M. Influence of aqueous extracts of medicinal plants on surface hydrophobicity of Escherichia coli strains of different origin. APMIS. 1997;105(12):956-962.
25. Beaux D, Fleurentin J, Mortier F. Effect of extracts of Orthosiphon stamineus Benth Hieracium pilosellaL., Sambucus nigra L. and Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. in rats. Phytother Res. 1999;13(3):222-225.
26. Kubo M, Ito M, Nakata H, Matsuda H. Pharmacological studies on leaf of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. I. Combined effect of 50% methanolic extract from Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. (bearberry leaf) and prednisolone on immuno-inflammation [article in Japanese]. Yakugaku Zasshi. 1990;110(1):59-67.
27. Larsson B, Jonasson A, Fianu S. Prophylactic effect of UVA-E in women with recurrent cystitis: a preliminary report. Curr Ther Res. 1993;53(4):441-443.
28. Christenson JT, Thulesius D, Nazzal MM. The effect of forskolin on blood flow platelet metabolism, aggregation and ATP release. Vasa. 1995;24(1):56-61.
29. Bishop BL, Duncan MJ, Song J, Li G, Zaas D, Abraham SN. Cyclic AMP-regulated exocytosis of Escherichia coli from infected bladder epithelial cells. Nat Med. 2007;13(5):625-630.
30. Beetz R. Mild dehydration: a risk factor of urinary tract infection? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(Suppl 2):S52-58.
31. Foxman B, Chi JW. Health behavior and urinary tract infection in college-aged women. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(4):329-337.
32. Thomas BH, Whitehouse LW, Solomonraj G, Paul CJ. Excretion of phenazopyridine and its metabolites in the urine of humans rats, mice, and guinea pigs. J Pharm Sci. 1990;79(4):321-325.
33. Aizawa N, Wyndaele JJ. Effects of phenazopyridine on rat bladder primary afferent activity and comparison with lidocaine and acetaminophen. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(8):1445-1550.
2013 Update on fertility
CLICK HERE to access several articles on treating fertility issues.
Dr. Abusief reports no financial relationships relevant to this article. Dr. Adamson reports that he receives research grants from LabCorp and Auxogyn, and is the founder and CEO of Advanced Reproductive Care.
Infertility is not just a woman’s issue; it is a couple’s issue. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, one-third of cases of infertility are caused by a reproductive problem for the woman, one-third are caused by a problem for the man, and one-third are due to problems for both partners or to unknown causes.1
Here, we discuss three developments within the past 12 months related to the treatment of infertility:
- The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Committee on Reproductive Medicine—charged with developing evidence-based, cost-effective guidelines that would be accepted as standards for increasing access to quality reproductive medical care in all countries of the world—has developed The FIGO Fertility Tool Box™.
- Smoking cigarettes negatively affects a man’s and woman’s fertility, yet smoking’s contribution to infertility is under-recognized. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine culled the evidence, and published its review on the effects of smoking on fertility.
- Results of a large, population-wide cohort study shed light on the association of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with birth defects and whether underlying factors present in patients with infertility also may play a role.
FIGO offers Tools for managing infertility
Adamson GD. A quick guide to the FIGO Fertility Tool Box. The FIGO Fertility Tool Box. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Web site. http://www.arcfertility.com/figo. Published 2013. Accessed January 21, 2013.
FIGO has as members 125 national ObGyn societies. The FIGO Committee on Reproductive Medicine’s mission is to create access to quality reproductive medical care and is focused on helping infertile women become pregnant and/or on alleviating the burden of infertility. The Committee has just released The FIGO Fertility Tool Box™ to further this goal.
Who should use the Tool Box?
Anybody who wants to help infertile people! It is designed for health-care workers and others who want to make a difference in the lives of infertile people. The Tool Box can be accessed electronically on both computers and cell phones at http://www.figo.org/news/resources/FIGO_Fertility_Tool_Box.
What’s in the Tool Box?
Seven Tools help you tackle the disease/ disability of infertility. Each Tool provides information on how to manage a particular aspect of infertility:
- Tool 1: The FIGO Fertility Daisy—why we should care about infertility
- Tool 2: Overcome personal barriers
- Tool 3: Overcome societal barriers
- Tool 4: Diagnose infertility
- Tool 5: Treat infertility
- Tool 6: Refer/resolve infertility
- Tool 7: Prevent infertility.
The Tools Pyramid ( FIGURE 1 ) contains these seven Tools.
FIGURE 1 The Tools Pyramid™
How do the Tools work?
Each of the seven Tools consists of three levels:
Level 1: Basic Tools. The first level consists of 7 Basic Tools™, which contain information that is brief and succinct—just a simple statement or summary of the Daisy and each of the six Pyramids of Action. The Basic Tools are colored orange.
Level 2: Support Tools. The second level is Support Tools™, which provide more information and detail—enough so that you know what to do to take action. Support Tools are colored green.
Level 3: Reference Tools. The third level is Reference Tools™, which are lists of references that provide evidence for the information and recommended actions in the Basic and Support Tools. Reference Tools are colored white.
The Glossary provides definitions and explanations of abbreviations and acronyms and is colored white like the References. By coloring the levels icons this way, you can always tell whether you are using a Basic Tool, Support Tool, or Reference Tool.
The Levels Pyramid (FIGURE 2 ) shows how the Basic Tools, Support Tools, and Reference Tools relate to each other. You can choose your Tool and level by clicking on the icons from your computer or cellphone.
FIGURE 2 The Levels Pyramid™
How do I know what to do?—The Actions Pyramids™
With the exception of the Daisy (Tool 1), all Tools have the shape of a pyramid ( FIGURE 3 ). At the base of each pyramid are actions that can be taken in low-resource settings; that is, they are often simpler, elementary, involve fewer people and are low-cost interventions or opportunities. Overall, there are 64 total actions described in the seven Tools.
As you move higher in the pyramid, generally more resources are required to take actions that are usually more complex. You can think of it as a kind of ladder—as you climb higher it usually gets a bit more complex or complicated. Sometimes, however, it might also be easier higher up on the ladder, and the elementary aspects might be those most challenging.
If you are interested in helping a patient with infertility, you are encouraged to do whatever you can do at any level in any of the Tools in The Actions Pyramid. In the online version, you can click on the actions arrow or icons to click immediately to the action you wish to learn about and do.
FIGURE 3 The Actions Pyramid™
Which Tool should I use?
The one you think will work best for you and will give you some results quickly. Doing something is better than doing nothing. There is no right or wrong way to make a start. Then, if you want to do more you can choose other Tools or individual aspects of other Tools to build on what you have already achieved. Or, if you want to be very systematic and are very committed you can start with Tool 1 and work your way through the entire Tool Box.
What if I can’t implement some of the recommendations?
Then drop it and move onto something that you can do or implement. No single component of the Tool Box is so essential to helping infertile couples that your efforts will fail if you can’t apply it. Using even one or two actions in one or two Tools will empower you to help many infertile individuals.
What if I want to change a Tool?
Just do it. The Tool Box is made to be changed so that it can be adapted to work in any type of health-care setting anywhere in the world. You know what works best in your situation. Just never stop caring and trying to help infertile people.
Does the Tool Box have a compliments and complaints section?
Yes, it is called the FIGO Committee on Reproductive Medicine. E-mail us at fertilitytool [email protected]. We would love to hear from you about what you like and what works in the Tool Box and what doesn’t. We hope to constantly improve The FIGO Fertility Tool Box to make it a better Tool to help you tackle the disease/disability of infertility.
This Tool Box now gives providers at any level of women’s health care anywhere in the world easy electronic access to comprehensive evidence-based actions that can be used to help those with infertility
Smoking, by either partner, active or passive, negatively affects reproductive health
Pfeifer S, Fritz M, Goldberg J, et al; the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Smoking and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(6):1400–1406.
Approximately 30% of reproductive-age women and 35% of reproductive-age men smoke cigarettes. Although smoking has been linked to many adverse health effects, the substantial detrimental effects of cigarette smoking on fecundity and reproduction are under-recognized. In a recent publication, the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine reviewed the effects of smoking on fertility.
Smoking’s ill effects on fertility
Conception delay
Smokers are at an increased risk for infertility and conception delay. Independent of other factors, smoking has a negative impact on fecundity, with a trend toward increased time to conception with increased number of cigarettes smoked.2,3 The percentage of women experiencing conception delay for more than 12 months was shown to be 54% higher in smoking versus nonsmoking women in one study.3 These authors found that active smoking by either partner had an adverse effect on conception. Furthermore, the impact of passive smoking by either partner was found to be only slightly less than the impact found for active smoking by either partner.3
Ovarian follicular depletion
Basal levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) are significantly higher in smokers, with one study demonstrating a 66% increase in smoking versus nonsmoking women and a 39% increase in passive versus nonsmoking women.4 Chemicals in cigarette smoke appear to accelerate follicular depletion and loss of reproductive function, and menopause has been found to occur 1 to 4 years earlier in smoking versus nonsmoking women.2
Effects on sperm parameters
Poor function. Smoking has been found to reduce sperm density, motility, and possibly morphology. Sperm function tests appear to be 22% poorer in smokers versus nonsmokers, and the effects are dose-dependent.
No link to male infertility, yet. While evidence suggests an adverse effect on sperm function from smoking, available data do not conclusively demonstrate a reduction in male fertility due to smoking. This could be due to secondary confounding effects of partner status.2
Maternal smoking may decrease sperm counts in offspring, according to Storgaard and colleagues, who found that men whose mothers had smoked more than 10 cigarettes per day had lower sperm densities than men with nonsmoking mothers.5
Mutagenic potential
Tobacco smoke exposure may harm gametogenesis by adversely affecting chromosomes and damaging the meiotic spindle and has been associated with an increased risk of trisomy 21 offspring resulting from maternal nondisjunction.6,7 Gene damage in sperm may be secondary to direct binding of tobacco smoke constituents or chemical byproducts to DNA, creating premutational lesions or “adducts.” These mutagenic adducts have been found in greater numbers in embryos from smokers versus nonsmokers, suggesting a mechanism for the transmission of adversely modified DNA from parental smoking.2
Early pregnancy effects
Smoking increases the risk of spontaneous miscarriage in both natural and assisted conceptions and has been linked to an increased risk for bacterial vaginosis, which in turn increases the risk for second trimester miscarriage and preterm labor.2 Studies also have identified an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy in smokers, including one study demonstrating an odds ratio (OR) for ectopic pregnancy of 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4–8.6) in women who smoked more than 20 cigarettes per day versus nonsmokers.6
Assisted reproductive therapies rendered less effective
Studies of IVF have demonstrated that smokers versus nonsmokers have an increased gonadotropin requirement for ovarian stimulation, lower peak estradiol levels, elevated testosterone levels, fewer oocytes retrieved, higher numbers of cancelled cycles, thicker zone pellucida, lower implantation rates, and an increased rate of failed fertilization.2 In order to achieve conception, smokers require nearly twice the number of IVF cycles versus nonsmokers.2 Authors of a 5-year, prospective study controlling for potential confounders found that if a woman ever smoked in her lifetime, her risk of failing to conceive with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) more than doubled (relative risk, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.38–4.55). Each year of smoking was associated with a 9% increase in the risk of unsuccessful ART cycles (95% CI, 1.02–1.15;
P <.01).8
We have an important role in helping patients quit
A study involving smoking cessation in infertile women found that simple interventions, such as counseling, education, and encouragement during each clinic visit, were more successful than merely providing educational materials and Web site addresses. The rates of smoking cessation increased from 4% at baseline to 24% after 12 months.9
The Public Health Service and National Cancer Institute offer validated, office-based intervention guidelines for smoking cessation, including a five-step approach2 :
- Ask about smoking at every opportunity
- Advise all smokers to stop
- Assist willingness to stop
- Assist patients in stopping (including through the use of pharmaceuticals and carbon monoxide handheld monitors)
- Arrange follow-up visits.
The use of adjunctive medical therapies, including nicotine replacement therapy and/or buproprion, has resulted in a twofold increase in the proportion of nonpregnant women who quit smoking.2 These medical therapies may be useful if behavioral approaches alone fail—although their use has not been studied in infertile women. Smoking cessation rates appear to be higher in infertile versus pregnant women, yet only 18% of women referred for infertility care have received advice on smoking cessation from their referring provider.9
The detrimental effects of smoking on reproductive health are substantial. Nonsmokers with excessive exposure to tobacco smoke have adverse reproductive effects that may be as great as those observed in smokers.
Studies suggest that much of the reduced fecundity observed in smokers may be reversed within 1 year of smoking cessation.2 Clinicians who care for smokers with infertility have a tremendous opportunity to facilitate smoking cessation in their patients and their partners. Smoking-cessation intervention should be a key component of effective treatment of infertility.
The safety of assisted reproductive technologies
Davies ML, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1803–1813.
Since the birth of Louise Brown, the first baby born after being conceived with in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 1978, IVF has become a pillar in the treatment of infertility. Although recognized as a highly effective treatment, the safety of IVF and its related technologies, such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), has been questioned. Studies have linked the use of assisted reproduction, including IVF and ICSI, with an increased risk of birth defects.10-15 Findings, however, were limited by small sample sizes and lack of appropriate controls. Furthermore, it has been unclear if this increased risk is due to factors related to treatment or to an underlying factor present in patients with infertility. It also has been unclear whether there is a differential in risk according to the type of ART used. In a large population-wide cohort study, Davies and colleagues linked a census of treatment with ART in South Australia to a registry of births and terminations with a gestation period of at least 20 weeks or a birth weight of 400 g and registries of birth defects.
The authors compared the risk of birth defects in pregnancies among women who had conceived with the use of ART, women with spontaneous pregnancies who had had a previous birth after ART treatment, women with a diagnosis of infertility who had conceived without ART, and pregnancies in women without infertility. Births and pregnancy terminations secondary to birth defects were studied to assess the birth defect risk from pregnancy to a child’s fifth birthday.
Details of the trial
A total of 308,974 births were included in the analysis. Births in women who conceived with the use of ART were associated with a significant increase in risk of birth defects (8.3%) compared with births conceived spontaneously in fertile women (8.3% vs 5.8%, respectively; unadjusted OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.33-1.62). This effect remained significant after multivariate adjustment (adjusted OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.16-1.41).
While there was no significant association between ART and the risk of specific syndromes such as Down’s, Turner’s, Edward’s, and others, there was a significantly increased adjusted OR for any defect and multiple defects in births conceived with ART versus those conceived spontaneously in fertile women.
The OR for birth defects associated with IVF was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.07-1.48) in unadjusted analyses and 1.07 (95% CI, 0.9-1.26) after multivariate adjustment. The OR for birth defects associated with IVF with ICSI were 1.77 (95% CI, 1.47-2.12) in unadjusted and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.30-1.90) after multivariate analysis. Compared with ICSI, IVF was associated with a reduced risk of any birth defect (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.87).
Births after gamete intrafallopian transfer, intrauterine insemination, or the use of clomiphene citrate at home were associated with significantly increased risks of any birth defect in adjusted analyses. Births after conception with donor insemination and clinically supervised ovulation induction were not associated with an increased risk of birth defects. Births occurring after spontaneous conception in women with a history of a previous birth with ART were also associated with an increased risk of birth defects, even after adjustment for confounders (adjusted OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.56). Births occurring after spontaneous conception in women with a history of infertility without previous ART treatment were also significantly associated with a small increased risk in birth defects (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.99-1.68).
ICSI and birth-defect association persisted
In this large observational study, the authors confirmed findings from previous studies11,12,16-18 that the number of birth defects found in pregnancies conceived with ART are higher than the number found in pregnancies conceived spontaneously. In this study, after multivariate adjustment, the association between IVF and an increased risk of birth defects was found to be no longer significant, but the risk remained elevated after ART with ICSI. These findings are similar to results in previous studies.18,19 The increased risk may be secondary to the ICSI procedure itself19,20 or to underlying male infertility factors leading to the use of ICSI.14
Birth defects appeared to be highest in fresh embryo cycles of ICSI versus IVF and lowest in frozen-embryo cycles. A reduction in birth defects with cryopreservation may be secondary to a reduced likelihood that cryopreserved embryos would survive the thawing process as well as the temporal separation of the developing embryo from a hormonally stimulated cycle.21-23 Treatment with ART was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, urogenital, and gastrointestinal defects, as well as cerebral palsy. The observation of an increased risk of cerebral palsy with ART treatment is consistent with findings from a previous study. Strömberg and colleagues found that the risk of cerebral palsy was increased by a factor of 3.7 among multiples conceived with IVF and 2.8 among singletons conceived with IVF.24
Davies and colleagues also observed that the risk of a birth defect was increased among women with a history of infertility who were able to conceive without ART,25 a finding observed in a previous large Danish registry.15
Although the vast majority of births resulting from assisted reproduction were free of birth defects, treatment with ART was associated with an increased risk of birth defects, compared with spontaneous conception. After adjustment for potential confounders, including maternal age, the risk persisted for conceptions associated with ICSI but not IVF.
While the exact mechanisms responsible for this increased risk remain unknown, the finding of an increased risk of birth defects among women with infertility who conceived without ART indicates that inherent patient factors, rather than assisted reproductive technologies alone, contribute to the risk. These findings can help to guide couples considering assisted reproduction for the treatment of infertility.
We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.
1. Infertility FAQs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/infertility. Updated April 19 2012. Accessed January 20, 2013.
2. Pfeifer S, Fritz M, Goldberg J, et al. the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Smoking and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(6):1400-1406.
3. Hull MG, North K, Taylor H, Farrow A, Ford WC. Delayed conception and active and passive smoking: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood Study Team. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(4):725-733.
4. Cooper GS, Baird DD, Hulka BS, Weinberg CR, Savitz DA, Hughes CL, Jr. Follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations in relation to active and passive smoking. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(3):407-411.
5. Storgaard L, Bonde JP, Ernst E, et al. Does smoking during pregnancy affect sons’ sperm counts? Epidemiology. 2003;14(3):278-286.
6. Yang Q, Sherman SL, Hassold TJ, et al. Risk factors for trisomy 21: maternal cigarette smoking and oral contraceptive use in a population-based case-control study. Genet Med. 1999;1(3):80-88.
7. Zenzes MT, Wang P, Casper RF. Cigarette smoking may affect meiotic maturation of human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(12):3213-3217.
8. Klonoff-Cohen H, Natarajan L, Marrs R, Yee B. Effects of female and male smoking on success rates of IVF and gamete intra-Fallopian transfer. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(7):1382-1390.
9. Hughes EG, Lamont DA, Beecroft ML, Wilson DM, Brennan BG, Rice SC. Randomized trial of a “stage of change” oriented smoking cessation intervention in infertile and pregnant women. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(3):498-503.
10. Rimm AA, Katayama AC, Diaz M, Katayama KP. A meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004;21(12):437-443.
11. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(10):725-730.
12. Hansen M, Bower C, Milne E, de Klerk N, Kurinczuk JJ. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects—a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(2):328-338.
13. Schieve LA, Rasmussen SA, Reefhuis J. Risk of birth defects among children conceived with assisted reproductive technology: providing an epidemiologic context to the data. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(5):1320-1324.
14. Lie RT, Lyngstadaas A, Ørstavik KH, Bakketeig LS, Jacobsen G, Tanbo T. Birth defects in children conceived by ICSI compared with children conceived by other IVF-methods; a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(3):696-701.
15. Zhu JL, Basso O, Obel C, Bille C, Olsen J. Infertility infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish national birth cohort. BMJ. 2006;333(7570):679.-
16. Reefhuis J, Honein MA, Schieve LA, Correa A, Hobbs CA, Rasmussen SA. National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(2):360-366.
17. El-Chaar D, Yang Q, Gao J, et al. Risk of birth defects increased in pregnancies conceived by assisted human reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1557-1561.
18. Källén B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, Olausson PO. In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: infant outcome after different IVF fertilization methods. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(3):611-617.
19. Bonduelle M, Wennerholm U, Loft A, et al. A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization and natural conception. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(2):413-419.
20. Kurinczuk JJ. Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: from theory to reality — just what are the data telling us about ICSI offspring health and future fertility and should we be concerned? Hum Reprod. 2003;18(5):925-931.
21. Pinborg A, Loft A, Aaris Henningsen AK, Rasmussen S, Andersen AN. Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: the Danish National Cohort Study 1995-2006. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1320-1327.
22. Halliday JL, Ukoumunne OC, Baker HW, et al. Increased risk of blastogenesis birth defects, arising in the first 4 weeks of pregnancy, after assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(1):59-65.
23. Wennerholm U, Söderström-Anttila V, Bergh C, et al. Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(9):2158-2172.
24. Strömberg B, Dahlquist G, Ericson A, Finnström O, Köster M, Stjernqvist K. Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population based study. Lancet. 2002;359(9305):461-465.
25. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1803-1813.
CLICK HERE to access several articles on treating fertility issues.
Dr. Abusief reports no financial relationships relevant to this article. Dr. Adamson reports that he receives research grants from LabCorp and Auxogyn, and is the founder and CEO of Advanced Reproductive Care.
Infertility is not just a woman’s issue; it is a couple’s issue. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, one-third of cases of infertility are caused by a reproductive problem for the woman, one-third are caused by a problem for the man, and one-third are due to problems for both partners or to unknown causes.1
Here, we discuss three developments within the past 12 months related to the treatment of infertility:
- The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Committee on Reproductive Medicine—charged with developing evidence-based, cost-effective guidelines that would be accepted as standards for increasing access to quality reproductive medical care in all countries of the world—has developed The FIGO Fertility Tool Box™.
- Smoking cigarettes negatively affects a man’s and woman’s fertility, yet smoking’s contribution to infertility is under-recognized. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine culled the evidence, and published its review on the effects of smoking on fertility.
- Results of a large, population-wide cohort study shed light on the association of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with birth defects and whether underlying factors present in patients with infertility also may play a role.
FIGO offers Tools for managing infertility
Adamson GD. A quick guide to the FIGO Fertility Tool Box. The FIGO Fertility Tool Box. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Web site. http://www.arcfertility.com/figo. Published 2013. Accessed January 21, 2013.
FIGO has as members 125 national ObGyn societies. The FIGO Committee on Reproductive Medicine’s mission is to create access to quality reproductive medical care and is focused on helping infertile women become pregnant and/or on alleviating the burden of infertility. The Committee has just released The FIGO Fertility Tool Box™ to further this goal.
Who should use the Tool Box?
Anybody who wants to help infertile people! It is designed for health-care workers and others who want to make a difference in the lives of infertile people. The Tool Box can be accessed electronically on both computers and cell phones at http://www.figo.org/news/resources/FIGO_Fertility_Tool_Box.
What’s in the Tool Box?
Seven Tools help you tackle the disease/ disability of infertility. Each Tool provides information on how to manage a particular aspect of infertility:
- Tool 1: The FIGO Fertility Daisy—why we should care about infertility
- Tool 2: Overcome personal barriers
- Tool 3: Overcome societal barriers
- Tool 4: Diagnose infertility
- Tool 5: Treat infertility
- Tool 6: Refer/resolve infertility
- Tool 7: Prevent infertility.
The Tools Pyramid ( FIGURE 1 ) contains these seven Tools.
FIGURE 1 The Tools Pyramid™
How do the Tools work?
Each of the seven Tools consists of three levels:
Level 1: Basic Tools. The first level consists of 7 Basic Tools™, which contain information that is brief and succinct—just a simple statement or summary of the Daisy and each of the six Pyramids of Action. The Basic Tools are colored orange.
Level 2: Support Tools. The second level is Support Tools™, which provide more information and detail—enough so that you know what to do to take action. Support Tools are colored green.
Level 3: Reference Tools. The third level is Reference Tools™, which are lists of references that provide evidence for the information and recommended actions in the Basic and Support Tools. Reference Tools are colored white.
The Glossary provides definitions and explanations of abbreviations and acronyms and is colored white like the References. By coloring the levels icons this way, you can always tell whether you are using a Basic Tool, Support Tool, or Reference Tool.
The Levels Pyramid (FIGURE 2 ) shows how the Basic Tools, Support Tools, and Reference Tools relate to each other. You can choose your Tool and level by clicking on the icons from your computer or cellphone.
FIGURE 2 The Levels Pyramid™
How do I know what to do?—The Actions Pyramids™
With the exception of the Daisy (Tool 1), all Tools have the shape of a pyramid ( FIGURE 3 ). At the base of each pyramid are actions that can be taken in low-resource settings; that is, they are often simpler, elementary, involve fewer people and are low-cost interventions or opportunities. Overall, there are 64 total actions described in the seven Tools.
As you move higher in the pyramid, generally more resources are required to take actions that are usually more complex. You can think of it as a kind of ladder—as you climb higher it usually gets a bit more complex or complicated. Sometimes, however, it might also be easier higher up on the ladder, and the elementary aspects might be those most challenging.
If you are interested in helping a patient with infertility, you are encouraged to do whatever you can do at any level in any of the Tools in The Actions Pyramid. In the online version, you can click on the actions arrow or icons to click immediately to the action you wish to learn about and do.
FIGURE 3 The Actions Pyramid™
Which Tool should I use?
The one you think will work best for you and will give you some results quickly. Doing something is better than doing nothing. There is no right or wrong way to make a start. Then, if you want to do more you can choose other Tools or individual aspects of other Tools to build on what you have already achieved. Or, if you want to be very systematic and are very committed you can start with Tool 1 and work your way through the entire Tool Box.
What if I can’t implement some of the recommendations?
Then drop it and move onto something that you can do or implement. No single component of the Tool Box is so essential to helping infertile couples that your efforts will fail if you can’t apply it. Using even one or two actions in one or two Tools will empower you to help many infertile individuals.
What if I want to change a Tool?
Just do it. The Tool Box is made to be changed so that it can be adapted to work in any type of health-care setting anywhere in the world. You know what works best in your situation. Just never stop caring and trying to help infertile people.
Does the Tool Box have a compliments and complaints section?
Yes, it is called the FIGO Committee on Reproductive Medicine. E-mail us at fertilitytool [email protected]. We would love to hear from you about what you like and what works in the Tool Box and what doesn’t. We hope to constantly improve The FIGO Fertility Tool Box to make it a better Tool to help you tackle the disease/disability of infertility.
This Tool Box now gives providers at any level of women’s health care anywhere in the world easy electronic access to comprehensive evidence-based actions that can be used to help those with infertility
Smoking, by either partner, active or passive, negatively affects reproductive health
Pfeifer S, Fritz M, Goldberg J, et al; the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Smoking and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(6):1400–1406.
Approximately 30% of reproductive-age women and 35% of reproductive-age men smoke cigarettes. Although smoking has been linked to many adverse health effects, the substantial detrimental effects of cigarette smoking on fecundity and reproduction are under-recognized. In a recent publication, the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine reviewed the effects of smoking on fertility.
Smoking’s ill effects on fertility
Conception delay
Smokers are at an increased risk for infertility and conception delay. Independent of other factors, smoking has a negative impact on fecundity, with a trend toward increased time to conception with increased number of cigarettes smoked.2,3 The percentage of women experiencing conception delay for more than 12 months was shown to be 54% higher in smoking versus nonsmoking women in one study.3 These authors found that active smoking by either partner had an adverse effect on conception. Furthermore, the impact of passive smoking by either partner was found to be only slightly less than the impact found for active smoking by either partner.3
Ovarian follicular depletion
Basal levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) are significantly higher in smokers, with one study demonstrating a 66% increase in smoking versus nonsmoking women and a 39% increase in passive versus nonsmoking women.4 Chemicals in cigarette smoke appear to accelerate follicular depletion and loss of reproductive function, and menopause has been found to occur 1 to 4 years earlier in smoking versus nonsmoking women.2
Effects on sperm parameters
Poor function. Smoking has been found to reduce sperm density, motility, and possibly morphology. Sperm function tests appear to be 22% poorer in smokers versus nonsmokers, and the effects are dose-dependent.
No link to male infertility, yet. While evidence suggests an adverse effect on sperm function from smoking, available data do not conclusively demonstrate a reduction in male fertility due to smoking. This could be due to secondary confounding effects of partner status.2
Maternal smoking may decrease sperm counts in offspring, according to Storgaard and colleagues, who found that men whose mothers had smoked more than 10 cigarettes per day had lower sperm densities than men with nonsmoking mothers.5
Mutagenic potential
Tobacco smoke exposure may harm gametogenesis by adversely affecting chromosomes and damaging the meiotic spindle and has been associated with an increased risk of trisomy 21 offspring resulting from maternal nondisjunction.6,7 Gene damage in sperm may be secondary to direct binding of tobacco smoke constituents or chemical byproducts to DNA, creating premutational lesions or “adducts.” These mutagenic adducts have been found in greater numbers in embryos from smokers versus nonsmokers, suggesting a mechanism for the transmission of adversely modified DNA from parental smoking.2
Early pregnancy effects
Smoking increases the risk of spontaneous miscarriage in both natural and assisted conceptions and has been linked to an increased risk for bacterial vaginosis, which in turn increases the risk for second trimester miscarriage and preterm labor.2 Studies also have identified an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy in smokers, including one study demonstrating an odds ratio (OR) for ectopic pregnancy of 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4–8.6) in women who smoked more than 20 cigarettes per day versus nonsmokers.6
Assisted reproductive therapies rendered less effective
Studies of IVF have demonstrated that smokers versus nonsmokers have an increased gonadotropin requirement for ovarian stimulation, lower peak estradiol levels, elevated testosterone levels, fewer oocytes retrieved, higher numbers of cancelled cycles, thicker zone pellucida, lower implantation rates, and an increased rate of failed fertilization.2 In order to achieve conception, smokers require nearly twice the number of IVF cycles versus nonsmokers.2 Authors of a 5-year, prospective study controlling for potential confounders found that if a woman ever smoked in her lifetime, her risk of failing to conceive with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) more than doubled (relative risk, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.38–4.55). Each year of smoking was associated with a 9% increase in the risk of unsuccessful ART cycles (95% CI, 1.02–1.15;
P <.01).8
We have an important role in helping patients quit
A study involving smoking cessation in infertile women found that simple interventions, such as counseling, education, and encouragement during each clinic visit, were more successful than merely providing educational materials and Web site addresses. The rates of smoking cessation increased from 4% at baseline to 24% after 12 months.9
The Public Health Service and National Cancer Institute offer validated, office-based intervention guidelines for smoking cessation, including a five-step approach2 :
- Ask about smoking at every opportunity
- Advise all smokers to stop
- Assist willingness to stop
- Assist patients in stopping (including through the use of pharmaceuticals and carbon monoxide handheld monitors)
- Arrange follow-up visits.
The use of adjunctive medical therapies, including nicotine replacement therapy and/or buproprion, has resulted in a twofold increase in the proportion of nonpregnant women who quit smoking.2 These medical therapies may be useful if behavioral approaches alone fail—although their use has not been studied in infertile women. Smoking cessation rates appear to be higher in infertile versus pregnant women, yet only 18% of women referred for infertility care have received advice on smoking cessation from their referring provider.9
The detrimental effects of smoking on reproductive health are substantial. Nonsmokers with excessive exposure to tobacco smoke have adverse reproductive effects that may be as great as those observed in smokers.
Studies suggest that much of the reduced fecundity observed in smokers may be reversed within 1 year of smoking cessation.2 Clinicians who care for smokers with infertility have a tremendous opportunity to facilitate smoking cessation in their patients and their partners. Smoking-cessation intervention should be a key component of effective treatment of infertility.
The safety of assisted reproductive technologies
Davies ML, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1803–1813.
Since the birth of Louise Brown, the first baby born after being conceived with in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 1978, IVF has become a pillar in the treatment of infertility. Although recognized as a highly effective treatment, the safety of IVF and its related technologies, such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), has been questioned. Studies have linked the use of assisted reproduction, including IVF and ICSI, with an increased risk of birth defects.10-15 Findings, however, were limited by small sample sizes and lack of appropriate controls. Furthermore, it has been unclear if this increased risk is due to factors related to treatment or to an underlying factor present in patients with infertility. It also has been unclear whether there is a differential in risk according to the type of ART used. In a large population-wide cohort study, Davies and colleagues linked a census of treatment with ART in South Australia to a registry of births and terminations with a gestation period of at least 20 weeks or a birth weight of 400 g and registries of birth defects.
The authors compared the risk of birth defects in pregnancies among women who had conceived with the use of ART, women with spontaneous pregnancies who had had a previous birth after ART treatment, women with a diagnosis of infertility who had conceived without ART, and pregnancies in women without infertility. Births and pregnancy terminations secondary to birth defects were studied to assess the birth defect risk from pregnancy to a child’s fifth birthday.
Details of the trial
A total of 308,974 births were included in the analysis. Births in women who conceived with the use of ART were associated with a significant increase in risk of birth defects (8.3%) compared with births conceived spontaneously in fertile women (8.3% vs 5.8%, respectively; unadjusted OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.33-1.62). This effect remained significant after multivariate adjustment (adjusted OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.16-1.41).
While there was no significant association between ART and the risk of specific syndromes such as Down’s, Turner’s, Edward’s, and others, there was a significantly increased adjusted OR for any defect and multiple defects in births conceived with ART versus those conceived spontaneously in fertile women.
The OR for birth defects associated with IVF was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.07-1.48) in unadjusted analyses and 1.07 (95% CI, 0.9-1.26) after multivariate adjustment. The OR for birth defects associated with IVF with ICSI were 1.77 (95% CI, 1.47-2.12) in unadjusted and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.30-1.90) after multivariate analysis. Compared with ICSI, IVF was associated with a reduced risk of any birth defect (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.87).
Births after gamete intrafallopian transfer, intrauterine insemination, or the use of clomiphene citrate at home were associated with significantly increased risks of any birth defect in adjusted analyses. Births after conception with donor insemination and clinically supervised ovulation induction were not associated with an increased risk of birth defects. Births occurring after spontaneous conception in women with a history of a previous birth with ART were also associated with an increased risk of birth defects, even after adjustment for confounders (adjusted OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.56). Births occurring after spontaneous conception in women with a history of infertility without previous ART treatment were also significantly associated with a small increased risk in birth defects (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.99-1.68).
ICSI and birth-defect association persisted
In this large observational study, the authors confirmed findings from previous studies11,12,16-18 that the number of birth defects found in pregnancies conceived with ART are higher than the number found in pregnancies conceived spontaneously. In this study, after multivariate adjustment, the association between IVF and an increased risk of birth defects was found to be no longer significant, but the risk remained elevated after ART with ICSI. These findings are similar to results in previous studies.18,19 The increased risk may be secondary to the ICSI procedure itself19,20 or to underlying male infertility factors leading to the use of ICSI.14
Birth defects appeared to be highest in fresh embryo cycles of ICSI versus IVF and lowest in frozen-embryo cycles. A reduction in birth defects with cryopreservation may be secondary to a reduced likelihood that cryopreserved embryos would survive the thawing process as well as the temporal separation of the developing embryo from a hormonally stimulated cycle.21-23 Treatment with ART was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, urogenital, and gastrointestinal defects, as well as cerebral palsy. The observation of an increased risk of cerebral palsy with ART treatment is consistent with findings from a previous study. Strömberg and colleagues found that the risk of cerebral palsy was increased by a factor of 3.7 among multiples conceived with IVF and 2.8 among singletons conceived with IVF.24
Davies and colleagues also observed that the risk of a birth defect was increased among women with a history of infertility who were able to conceive without ART,25 a finding observed in a previous large Danish registry.15
Although the vast majority of births resulting from assisted reproduction were free of birth defects, treatment with ART was associated with an increased risk of birth defects, compared with spontaneous conception. After adjustment for potential confounders, including maternal age, the risk persisted for conceptions associated with ICSI but not IVF.
While the exact mechanisms responsible for this increased risk remain unknown, the finding of an increased risk of birth defects among women with infertility who conceived without ART indicates that inherent patient factors, rather than assisted reproductive technologies alone, contribute to the risk. These findings can help to guide couples considering assisted reproduction for the treatment of infertility.
We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.
CLICK HERE to access several articles on treating fertility issues.
Dr. Abusief reports no financial relationships relevant to this article. Dr. Adamson reports that he receives research grants from LabCorp and Auxogyn, and is the founder and CEO of Advanced Reproductive Care.
Infertility is not just a woman’s issue; it is a couple’s issue. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, one-third of cases of infertility are caused by a reproductive problem for the woman, one-third are caused by a problem for the man, and one-third are due to problems for both partners or to unknown causes.1
Here, we discuss three developments within the past 12 months related to the treatment of infertility:
- The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Committee on Reproductive Medicine—charged with developing evidence-based, cost-effective guidelines that would be accepted as standards for increasing access to quality reproductive medical care in all countries of the world—has developed The FIGO Fertility Tool Box™.
- Smoking cigarettes negatively affects a man’s and woman’s fertility, yet smoking’s contribution to infertility is under-recognized. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine culled the evidence, and published its review on the effects of smoking on fertility.
- Results of a large, population-wide cohort study shed light on the association of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with birth defects and whether underlying factors present in patients with infertility also may play a role.
FIGO offers Tools for managing infertility
Adamson GD. A quick guide to the FIGO Fertility Tool Box. The FIGO Fertility Tool Box. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Web site. http://www.arcfertility.com/figo. Published 2013. Accessed January 21, 2013.
FIGO has as members 125 national ObGyn societies. The FIGO Committee on Reproductive Medicine’s mission is to create access to quality reproductive medical care and is focused on helping infertile women become pregnant and/or on alleviating the burden of infertility. The Committee has just released The FIGO Fertility Tool Box™ to further this goal.
Who should use the Tool Box?
Anybody who wants to help infertile people! It is designed for health-care workers and others who want to make a difference in the lives of infertile people. The Tool Box can be accessed electronically on both computers and cell phones at http://www.figo.org/news/resources/FIGO_Fertility_Tool_Box.
What’s in the Tool Box?
Seven Tools help you tackle the disease/ disability of infertility. Each Tool provides information on how to manage a particular aspect of infertility:
- Tool 1: The FIGO Fertility Daisy—why we should care about infertility
- Tool 2: Overcome personal barriers
- Tool 3: Overcome societal barriers
- Tool 4: Diagnose infertility
- Tool 5: Treat infertility
- Tool 6: Refer/resolve infertility
- Tool 7: Prevent infertility.
The Tools Pyramid ( FIGURE 1 ) contains these seven Tools.
FIGURE 1 The Tools Pyramid™
How do the Tools work?
Each of the seven Tools consists of three levels:
Level 1: Basic Tools. The first level consists of 7 Basic Tools™, which contain information that is brief and succinct—just a simple statement or summary of the Daisy and each of the six Pyramids of Action. The Basic Tools are colored orange.
Level 2: Support Tools. The second level is Support Tools™, which provide more information and detail—enough so that you know what to do to take action. Support Tools are colored green.
Level 3: Reference Tools. The third level is Reference Tools™, which are lists of references that provide evidence for the information and recommended actions in the Basic and Support Tools. Reference Tools are colored white.
The Glossary provides definitions and explanations of abbreviations and acronyms and is colored white like the References. By coloring the levels icons this way, you can always tell whether you are using a Basic Tool, Support Tool, or Reference Tool.
The Levels Pyramid (FIGURE 2 ) shows how the Basic Tools, Support Tools, and Reference Tools relate to each other. You can choose your Tool and level by clicking on the icons from your computer or cellphone.
FIGURE 2 The Levels Pyramid™
How do I know what to do?—The Actions Pyramids™
With the exception of the Daisy (Tool 1), all Tools have the shape of a pyramid ( FIGURE 3 ). At the base of each pyramid are actions that can be taken in low-resource settings; that is, they are often simpler, elementary, involve fewer people and are low-cost interventions or opportunities. Overall, there are 64 total actions described in the seven Tools.
As you move higher in the pyramid, generally more resources are required to take actions that are usually more complex. You can think of it as a kind of ladder—as you climb higher it usually gets a bit more complex or complicated. Sometimes, however, it might also be easier higher up on the ladder, and the elementary aspects might be those most challenging.
If you are interested in helping a patient with infertility, you are encouraged to do whatever you can do at any level in any of the Tools in The Actions Pyramid. In the online version, you can click on the actions arrow or icons to click immediately to the action you wish to learn about and do.
FIGURE 3 The Actions Pyramid™
Which Tool should I use?
The one you think will work best for you and will give you some results quickly. Doing something is better than doing nothing. There is no right or wrong way to make a start. Then, if you want to do more you can choose other Tools or individual aspects of other Tools to build on what you have already achieved. Or, if you want to be very systematic and are very committed you can start with Tool 1 and work your way through the entire Tool Box.
What if I can’t implement some of the recommendations?
Then drop it and move onto something that you can do or implement. No single component of the Tool Box is so essential to helping infertile couples that your efforts will fail if you can’t apply it. Using even one or two actions in one or two Tools will empower you to help many infertile individuals.
What if I want to change a Tool?
Just do it. The Tool Box is made to be changed so that it can be adapted to work in any type of health-care setting anywhere in the world. You know what works best in your situation. Just never stop caring and trying to help infertile people.
Does the Tool Box have a compliments and complaints section?
Yes, it is called the FIGO Committee on Reproductive Medicine. E-mail us at fertilitytool [email protected]. We would love to hear from you about what you like and what works in the Tool Box and what doesn’t. We hope to constantly improve The FIGO Fertility Tool Box to make it a better Tool to help you tackle the disease/disability of infertility.
This Tool Box now gives providers at any level of women’s health care anywhere in the world easy electronic access to comprehensive evidence-based actions that can be used to help those with infertility
Smoking, by either partner, active or passive, negatively affects reproductive health
Pfeifer S, Fritz M, Goldberg J, et al; the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Smoking and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(6):1400–1406.
Approximately 30% of reproductive-age women and 35% of reproductive-age men smoke cigarettes. Although smoking has been linked to many adverse health effects, the substantial detrimental effects of cigarette smoking on fecundity and reproduction are under-recognized. In a recent publication, the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine reviewed the effects of smoking on fertility.
Smoking’s ill effects on fertility
Conception delay
Smokers are at an increased risk for infertility and conception delay. Independent of other factors, smoking has a negative impact on fecundity, with a trend toward increased time to conception with increased number of cigarettes smoked.2,3 The percentage of women experiencing conception delay for more than 12 months was shown to be 54% higher in smoking versus nonsmoking women in one study.3 These authors found that active smoking by either partner had an adverse effect on conception. Furthermore, the impact of passive smoking by either partner was found to be only slightly less than the impact found for active smoking by either partner.3
Ovarian follicular depletion
Basal levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) are significantly higher in smokers, with one study demonstrating a 66% increase in smoking versus nonsmoking women and a 39% increase in passive versus nonsmoking women.4 Chemicals in cigarette smoke appear to accelerate follicular depletion and loss of reproductive function, and menopause has been found to occur 1 to 4 years earlier in smoking versus nonsmoking women.2
Effects on sperm parameters
Poor function. Smoking has been found to reduce sperm density, motility, and possibly morphology. Sperm function tests appear to be 22% poorer in smokers versus nonsmokers, and the effects are dose-dependent.
No link to male infertility, yet. While evidence suggests an adverse effect on sperm function from smoking, available data do not conclusively demonstrate a reduction in male fertility due to smoking. This could be due to secondary confounding effects of partner status.2
Maternal smoking may decrease sperm counts in offspring, according to Storgaard and colleagues, who found that men whose mothers had smoked more than 10 cigarettes per day had lower sperm densities than men with nonsmoking mothers.5
Mutagenic potential
Tobacco smoke exposure may harm gametogenesis by adversely affecting chromosomes and damaging the meiotic spindle and has been associated with an increased risk of trisomy 21 offspring resulting from maternal nondisjunction.6,7 Gene damage in sperm may be secondary to direct binding of tobacco smoke constituents or chemical byproducts to DNA, creating premutational lesions or “adducts.” These mutagenic adducts have been found in greater numbers in embryos from smokers versus nonsmokers, suggesting a mechanism for the transmission of adversely modified DNA from parental smoking.2
Early pregnancy effects
Smoking increases the risk of spontaneous miscarriage in both natural and assisted conceptions and has been linked to an increased risk for bacterial vaginosis, which in turn increases the risk for second trimester miscarriage and preterm labor.2 Studies also have identified an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy in smokers, including one study demonstrating an odds ratio (OR) for ectopic pregnancy of 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4–8.6) in women who smoked more than 20 cigarettes per day versus nonsmokers.6
Assisted reproductive therapies rendered less effective
Studies of IVF have demonstrated that smokers versus nonsmokers have an increased gonadotropin requirement for ovarian stimulation, lower peak estradiol levels, elevated testosterone levels, fewer oocytes retrieved, higher numbers of cancelled cycles, thicker zone pellucida, lower implantation rates, and an increased rate of failed fertilization.2 In order to achieve conception, smokers require nearly twice the number of IVF cycles versus nonsmokers.2 Authors of a 5-year, prospective study controlling for potential confounders found that if a woman ever smoked in her lifetime, her risk of failing to conceive with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) more than doubled (relative risk, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.38–4.55). Each year of smoking was associated with a 9% increase in the risk of unsuccessful ART cycles (95% CI, 1.02–1.15;
P <.01).8
We have an important role in helping patients quit
A study involving smoking cessation in infertile women found that simple interventions, such as counseling, education, and encouragement during each clinic visit, were more successful than merely providing educational materials and Web site addresses. The rates of smoking cessation increased from 4% at baseline to 24% after 12 months.9
The Public Health Service and National Cancer Institute offer validated, office-based intervention guidelines for smoking cessation, including a five-step approach2 :
- Ask about smoking at every opportunity
- Advise all smokers to stop
- Assist willingness to stop
- Assist patients in stopping (including through the use of pharmaceuticals and carbon monoxide handheld monitors)
- Arrange follow-up visits.
The use of adjunctive medical therapies, including nicotine replacement therapy and/or buproprion, has resulted in a twofold increase in the proportion of nonpregnant women who quit smoking.2 These medical therapies may be useful if behavioral approaches alone fail—although their use has not been studied in infertile women. Smoking cessation rates appear to be higher in infertile versus pregnant women, yet only 18% of women referred for infertility care have received advice on smoking cessation from their referring provider.9
The detrimental effects of smoking on reproductive health are substantial. Nonsmokers with excessive exposure to tobacco smoke have adverse reproductive effects that may be as great as those observed in smokers.
Studies suggest that much of the reduced fecundity observed in smokers may be reversed within 1 year of smoking cessation.2 Clinicians who care for smokers with infertility have a tremendous opportunity to facilitate smoking cessation in their patients and their partners. Smoking-cessation intervention should be a key component of effective treatment of infertility.
The safety of assisted reproductive technologies
Davies ML, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1803–1813.
Since the birth of Louise Brown, the first baby born after being conceived with in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 1978, IVF has become a pillar in the treatment of infertility. Although recognized as a highly effective treatment, the safety of IVF and its related technologies, such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), has been questioned. Studies have linked the use of assisted reproduction, including IVF and ICSI, with an increased risk of birth defects.10-15 Findings, however, were limited by small sample sizes and lack of appropriate controls. Furthermore, it has been unclear if this increased risk is due to factors related to treatment or to an underlying factor present in patients with infertility. It also has been unclear whether there is a differential in risk according to the type of ART used. In a large population-wide cohort study, Davies and colleagues linked a census of treatment with ART in South Australia to a registry of births and terminations with a gestation period of at least 20 weeks or a birth weight of 400 g and registries of birth defects.
The authors compared the risk of birth defects in pregnancies among women who had conceived with the use of ART, women with spontaneous pregnancies who had had a previous birth after ART treatment, women with a diagnosis of infertility who had conceived without ART, and pregnancies in women without infertility. Births and pregnancy terminations secondary to birth defects were studied to assess the birth defect risk from pregnancy to a child’s fifth birthday.
Details of the trial
A total of 308,974 births were included in the analysis. Births in women who conceived with the use of ART were associated with a significant increase in risk of birth defects (8.3%) compared with births conceived spontaneously in fertile women (8.3% vs 5.8%, respectively; unadjusted OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.33-1.62). This effect remained significant after multivariate adjustment (adjusted OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.16-1.41).
While there was no significant association between ART and the risk of specific syndromes such as Down’s, Turner’s, Edward’s, and others, there was a significantly increased adjusted OR for any defect and multiple defects in births conceived with ART versus those conceived spontaneously in fertile women.
The OR for birth defects associated with IVF was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.07-1.48) in unadjusted analyses and 1.07 (95% CI, 0.9-1.26) after multivariate adjustment. The OR for birth defects associated with IVF with ICSI were 1.77 (95% CI, 1.47-2.12) in unadjusted and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.30-1.90) after multivariate analysis. Compared with ICSI, IVF was associated with a reduced risk of any birth defect (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.87).
Births after gamete intrafallopian transfer, intrauterine insemination, or the use of clomiphene citrate at home were associated with significantly increased risks of any birth defect in adjusted analyses. Births after conception with donor insemination and clinically supervised ovulation induction were not associated with an increased risk of birth defects. Births occurring after spontaneous conception in women with a history of a previous birth with ART were also associated with an increased risk of birth defects, even after adjustment for confounders (adjusted OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.56). Births occurring after spontaneous conception in women with a history of infertility without previous ART treatment were also significantly associated with a small increased risk in birth defects (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.99-1.68).
ICSI and birth-defect association persisted
In this large observational study, the authors confirmed findings from previous studies11,12,16-18 that the number of birth defects found in pregnancies conceived with ART are higher than the number found in pregnancies conceived spontaneously. In this study, after multivariate adjustment, the association between IVF and an increased risk of birth defects was found to be no longer significant, but the risk remained elevated after ART with ICSI. These findings are similar to results in previous studies.18,19 The increased risk may be secondary to the ICSI procedure itself19,20 or to underlying male infertility factors leading to the use of ICSI.14
Birth defects appeared to be highest in fresh embryo cycles of ICSI versus IVF and lowest in frozen-embryo cycles. A reduction in birth defects with cryopreservation may be secondary to a reduced likelihood that cryopreserved embryos would survive the thawing process as well as the temporal separation of the developing embryo from a hormonally stimulated cycle.21-23 Treatment with ART was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, urogenital, and gastrointestinal defects, as well as cerebral palsy. The observation of an increased risk of cerebral palsy with ART treatment is consistent with findings from a previous study. Strömberg and colleagues found that the risk of cerebral palsy was increased by a factor of 3.7 among multiples conceived with IVF and 2.8 among singletons conceived with IVF.24
Davies and colleagues also observed that the risk of a birth defect was increased among women with a history of infertility who were able to conceive without ART,25 a finding observed in a previous large Danish registry.15
Although the vast majority of births resulting from assisted reproduction were free of birth defects, treatment with ART was associated with an increased risk of birth defects, compared with spontaneous conception. After adjustment for potential confounders, including maternal age, the risk persisted for conceptions associated with ICSI but not IVF.
While the exact mechanisms responsible for this increased risk remain unknown, the finding of an increased risk of birth defects among women with infertility who conceived without ART indicates that inherent patient factors, rather than assisted reproductive technologies alone, contribute to the risk. These findings can help to guide couples considering assisted reproduction for the treatment of infertility.
We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.
1. Infertility FAQs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/infertility. Updated April 19 2012. Accessed January 20, 2013.
2. Pfeifer S, Fritz M, Goldberg J, et al. the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Smoking and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(6):1400-1406.
3. Hull MG, North K, Taylor H, Farrow A, Ford WC. Delayed conception and active and passive smoking: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood Study Team. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(4):725-733.
4. Cooper GS, Baird DD, Hulka BS, Weinberg CR, Savitz DA, Hughes CL, Jr. Follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations in relation to active and passive smoking. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(3):407-411.
5. Storgaard L, Bonde JP, Ernst E, et al. Does smoking during pregnancy affect sons’ sperm counts? Epidemiology. 2003;14(3):278-286.
6. Yang Q, Sherman SL, Hassold TJ, et al. Risk factors for trisomy 21: maternal cigarette smoking and oral contraceptive use in a population-based case-control study. Genet Med. 1999;1(3):80-88.
7. Zenzes MT, Wang P, Casper RF. Cigarette smoking may affect meiotic maturation of human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(12):3213-3217.
8. Klonoff-Cohen H, Natarajan L, Marrs R, Yee B. Effects of female and male smoking on success rates of IVF and gamete intra-Fallopian transfer. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(7):1382-1390.
9. Hughes EG, Lamont DA, Beecroft ML, Wilson DM, Brennan BG, Rice SC. Randomized trial of a “stage of change” oriented smoking cessation intervention in infertile and pregnant women. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(3):498-503.
10. Rimm AA, Katayama AC, Diaz M, Katayama KP. A meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004;21(12):437-443.
11. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(10):725-730.
12. Hansen M, Bower C, Milne E, de Klerk N, Kurinczuk JJ. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects—a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(2):328-338.
13. Schieve LA, Rasmussen SA, Reefhuis J. Risk of birth defects among children conceived with assisted reproductive technology: providing an epidemiologic context to the data. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(5):1320-1324.
14. Lie RT, Lyngstadaas A, Ørstavik KH, Bakketeig LS, Jacobsen G, Tanbo T. Birth defects in children conceived by ICSI compared with children conceived by other IVF-methods; a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(3):696-701.
15. Zhu JL, Basso O, Obel C, Bille C, Olsen J. Infertility infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish national birth cohort. BMJ. 2006;333(7570):679.-
16. Reefhuis J, Honein MA, Schieve LA, Correa A, Hobbs CA, Rasmussen SA. National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(2):360-366.
17. El-Chaar D, Yang Q, Gao J, et al. Risk of birth defects increased in pregnancies conceived by assisted human reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1557-1561.
18. Källén B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, Olausson PO. In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: infant outcome after different IVF fertilization methods. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(3):611-617.
19. Bonduelle M, Wennerholm U, Loft A, et al. A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization and natural conception. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(2):413-419.
20. Kurinczuk JJ. Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: from theory to reality — just what are the data telling us about ICSI offspring health and future fertility and should we be concerned? Hum Reprod. 2003;18(5):925-931.
21. Pinborg A, Loft A, Aaris Henningsen AK, Rasmussen S, Andersen AN. Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: the Danish National Cohort Study 1995-2006. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1320-1327.
22. Halliday JL, Ukoumunne OC, Baker HW, et al. Increased risk of blastogenesis birth defects, arising in the first 4 weeks of pregnancy, after assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(1):59-65.
23. Wennerholm U, Söderström-Anttila V, Bergh C, et al. Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(9):2158-2172.
24. Strömberg B, Dahlquist G, Ericson A, Finnström O, Köster M, Stjernqvist K. Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population based study. Lancet. 2002;359(9305):461-465.
25. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1803-1813.
1. Infertility FAQs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/infertility. Updated April 19 2012. Accessed January 20, 2013.
2. Pfeifer S, Fritz M, Goldberg J, et al. the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Smoking and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(6):1400-1406.
3. Hull MG, North K, Taylor H, Farrow A, Ford WC. Delayed conception and active and passive smoking: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood Study Team. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(4):725-733.
4. Cooper GS, Baird DD, Hulka BS, Weinberg CR, Savitz DA, Hughes CL, Jr. Follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations in relation to active and passive smoking. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(3):407-411.
5. Storgaard L, Bonde JP, Ernst E, et al. Does smoking during pregnancy affect sons’ sperm counts? Epidemiology. 2003;14(3):278-286.
6. Yang Q, Sherman SL, Hassold TJ, et al. Risk factors for trisomy 21: maternal cigarette smoking and oral contraceptive use in a population-based case-control study. Genet Med. 1999;1(3):80-88.
7. Zenzes MT, Wang P, Casper RF. Cigarette smoking may affect meiotic maturation of human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(12):3213-3217.
8. Klonoff-Cohen H, Natarajan L, Marrs R, Yee B. Effects of female and male smoking on success rates of IVF and gamete intra-Fallopian transfer. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(7):1382-1390.
9. Hughes EG, Lamont DA, Beecroft ML, Wilson DM, Brennan BG, Rice SC. Randomized trial of a “stage of change” oriented smoking cessation intervention in infertile and pregnant women. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(3):498-503.
10. Rimm AA, Katayama AC, Diaz M, Katayama KP. A meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004;21(12):437-443.
11. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(10):725-730.
12. Hansen M, Bower C, Milne E, de Klerk N, Kurinczuk JJ. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects—a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(2):328-338.
13. Schieve LA, Rasmussen SA, Reefhuis J. Risk of birth defects among children conceived with assisted reproductive technology: providing an epidemiologic context to the data. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(5):1320-1324.
14. Lie RT, Lyngstadaas A, Ørstavik KH, Bakketeig LS, Jacobsen G, Tanbo T. Birth defects in children conceived by ICSI compared with children conceived by other IVF-methods; a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(3):696-701.
15. Zhu JL, Basso O, Obel C, Bille C, Olsen J. Infertility infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish national birth cohort. BMJ. 2006;333(7570):679.-
16. Reefhuis J, Honein MA, Schieve LA, Correa A, Hobbs CA, Rasmussen SA. National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(2):360-366.
17. El-Chaar D, Yang Q, Gao J, et al. Risk of birth defects increased in pregnancies conceived by assisted human reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1557-1561.
18. Källén B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, Olausson PO. In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: infant outcome after different IVF fertilization methods. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(3):611-617.
19. Bonduelle M, Wennerholm U, Loft A, et al. A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization and natural conception. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(2):413-419.
20. Kurinczuk JJ. Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: from theory to reality — just what are the data telling us about ICSI offspring health and future fertility and should we be concerned? Hum Reprod. 2003;18(5):925-931.
21. Pinborg A, Loft A, Aaris Henningsen AK, Rasmussen S, Andersen AN. Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: the Danish National Cohort Study 1995-2006. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1320-1327.
22. Halliday JL, Ukoumunne OC, Baker HW, et al. Increased risk of blastogenesis birth defects, arising in the first 4 weeks of pregnancy, after assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(1):59-65.
23. Wennerholm U, Söderström-Anttila V, Bergh C, et al. Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(9):2158-2172.
24. Strömberg B, Dahlquist G, Ericson A, Finnström O, Köster M, Stjernqvist K. Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population based study. Lancet. 2002;359(9305):461-465.
25. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1803-1813.
Cognitive Screening Tools
The purpose of cognitive screening tests is to aid the clinician in early detection of cognitive change as a first step toward accurate diagnosis—a process that requires further assessment. Such changes may herald the beginning of a dementia, such as Alzheimer’s disease, or may indicate an increased risk for delirium, such as in the postoperative setting,6 or functional decline with accompanying safety concerns.7 Early identification of cognitive changes provides an opportunity for case finding, crisis avoidance, and identification of patients for earlier intervention and management, including a discussion of goals with the patient, and assurance that advance directives are complete and accurate.
There is no clear consensus on who should undergo cognitive screening or how frequently it should be carried out. Screening should be targeted at individuals who are at greatest risk for either progressive dementia or delirium. Advancing age is a known risk factor for dementia, but there is no agreement on a specific age at which to initiate cognitive screening. In patients older than 80, there is a 25% to 50% prevalence of dementia,1,11,12 thus suggesting that cognitive screening should be initiated before this age. Furthermore, clinicians who provide medical care for patients of advanced age must be increasingly attentive to the possible presence of cognitive decline.
There is no single, ideal cognitive screening tool that can be recommended for use in every clinical setting. However, the ideal tool would have high sensitivity (ie, the proportion of those with impairment correctly classified as impaired), high specificity (the proportion of those who are unimpaired correctly identified as not having cognitive problems; see Table 1,24-29 below), and a high positive predictive value (proportion identified by screening as impaired who really have cognitive impairment). Additionally, such a tool should be easy to administer and score, and should take a minimum amount of time to conduct in our time-pressured clinical environment.
Cognitive screening does involve some risk, and every tool has known limitations. A significant barrier can be the administration time required, possibly ranging from five to 20 minutes. There is a potential for false-positive results, and there can be distress and stigma associated with a diagnosis of dementia, for both patients and families.
A variety of tools are available for bedside/clinical assessment of cognition (see Table 226,30-34 below). Their administration can be learned without difficulty, and they can be conducted with relative ease to provide insight into a patient’s cognitive abilities and deficits.
The most commonly used cognitive screening tool is the Folstein Mini–Mental State Exam (MMSE).30 With administration taking about 15 minutes, the MMSE includes assessment of attention, orientation, registration, recall/short-term memory, language, and visuospatial construction. Clinicians will find this tool most useful in assessing the individual with suspected early dementia and to follow progression through the early and middle stages of cognitive decline in those with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementing disorders.
The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is perhaps the simplest test to administer.29,32 The patient is given a blank sheet of paper and asked to draw a large circle, then to write numbers inside the circle so that it resembles a face of a clock. Once this is completed, the patient is instructed to “draw the hands on the clock to read ten past eleven.”
The Mini-Cog Test (with instructions available at http://geriatrics.uthscsa.edu/tools/MINICog.pdf) includes the clock-drawing task and a three-word recall, with a simple scoring algorithm.33 Ability to recall all three words, or to recall one or two words with normal results on the clock test, represents a negative screening result for dementia. Conversely, an inability to recall any of the three words, or ability to recall only one or two words with an abnormal clock test, is considered a positive screen for dementia. The Mini-Cog is a good tool for identification of early dementia, but not useful for following changes in individuals identified with cognitive impairment.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was originally designed as a brief screening instrument for mild cognitive impairment.34 It is a single-page, 30-point test, available in multiple languages (with several versions in some languages) at www.mocatest.org. The MoCA includes assessment of short-term memory, visuospatial ability, executive function, attention, concentration, working memory, language, and orientation. A score of 25 or lower is considered subnormal.
The Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) has also been shown to have better sensitivity than the MMSE for early cognitive changes.26 This 11-item tool, with a maximum score of 30 points, includes assessment of seven cognitive domains: orientation, recall, attention, calculation, fluency, language, and visuospatial construction. The five-item delayed recall in the SLUMS has been shown to be an excellent discriminator of those with normal cognition versus mild cognitive change. It is available for general use with no fee; currently, it is widely used by the Veterans Administration system.41
The General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG)27 is a unique two-part tool that includes questions for the patient and for someone who knows the patient well (“informant”). The patient items include memory/recall, orientation, and visuospatial tasks. The six informant questions ask about recall, language, and functional abilities. The GPCOG has been shown to have sensitivity and specificity similar to those of the MMSE27; as its name indicates, it is designed and best suited for screening in a family medicine or general internal medicine practice.
The Memory Impairment Screen (MIS)28 uses a four-item memory recall with simple scoring of 0 to 8, based on the formula: 2x [the number recalled spontaneously) + (the number recalled with cuing)]. It takes less than five minutes to administer, making it a useful tool to screen for suspected memory problems in a busy setting, such as an emergency room. However, the sole reliance on memory, without screening for any other areas of cognition (especially executive function or visuospatial copying), significantly limits the usefulness of the MIS as a general cognitive screening tool.
The cognitive screening instruments described thus far were all designed to be administered in person in a medical setting (office, clinic, or hospital). The 11-item Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS)42 was developed as a brief (taking less than 10 minutes) standardized test of cognitive function, specifically suited for situations in which in-person screening is not possible (eg, for patients who are unable to appear in person for clinical follow-up).42-44 The modified TICS (TICS-M), which includes 13 items, has been shown to have less of a ceiling effect than the MMSE.45 It has also been shown to be a cost-effective screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.46
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale is a useful tool for staging cognitive decline, regardless of the patient’s diagnosis.47 It uses a 0-to-5 rating system in which 0 is considered normal and 5 represents profound impairment/total dependence (see Table 4,47-49 below). The CDR rating system addresses three areas of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment) and three areas of function (community affairs, home and hobbies, personal care). This tool is very helpful to explain to families where an individual with cognitive impairment is in the course of the disease, and what to expect and plan for in the future as the condition progresses. A comparison of CDR level and cognitive screening test scores is presented in Table 5.30,31,34,49
Clinicians in all settings need to become familiar with the use and interpretation of readily available instruments for cognitive screening. None of the tools reviewed is diagnostic in itself, and no one tool is appropriate for all patients in all settings. Familiarity with the components of the most commonly used cognitive screening tools and associated clinical instruments will aid the clinician in the appropriate use and interpretation of these to improve clinical care and outcomes for patients.
1. Alzheimer’s Association. 2012 Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures. www.alz.org/downloads/facts_figures_2012.pdf. Accessed December 11, 2012.
The purpose of cognitive screening tests is to aid the clinician in early detection of cognitive change as a first step toward accurate diagnosis—a process that requires further assessment. Such changes may herald the beginning of a dementia, such as Alzheimer’s disease, or may indicate an increased risk for delirium, such as in the postoperative setting,6 or functional decline with accompanying safety concerns.7 Early identification of cognitive changes provides an opportunity for case finding, crisis avoidance, and identification of patients for earlier intervention and management, including a discussion of goals with the patient, and assurance that advance directives are complete and accurate.
There is no clear consensus on who should undergo cognitive screening or how frequently it should be carried out. Screening should be targeted at individuals who are at greatest risk for either progressive dementia or delirium. Advancing age is a known risk factor for dementia, but there is no agreement on a specific age at which to initiate cognitive screening. In patients older than 80, there is a 25% to 50% prevalence of dementia,1,11,12 thus suggesting that cognitive screening should be initiated before this age. Furthermore, clinicians who provide medical care for patients of advanced age must be increasingly attentive to the possible presence of cognitive decline.
There is no single, ideal cognitive screening tool that can be recommended for use in every clinical setting. However, the ideal tool would have high sensitivity (ie, the proportion of those with impairment correctly classified as impaired), high specificity (the proportion of those who are unimpaired correctly identified as not having cognitive problems; see Table 1,24-29 below), and a high positive predictive value (proportion identified by screening as impaired who really have cognitive impairment). Additionally, such a tool should be easy to administer and score, and should take a minimum amount of time to conduct in our time-pressured clinical environment.
Cognitive screening does involve some risk, and every tool has known limitations. A significant barrier can be the administration time required, possibly ranging from five to 20 minutes. There is a potential for false-positive results, and there can be distress and stigma associated with a diagnosis of dementia, for both patients and families.
A variety of tools are available for bedside/clinical assessment of cognition (see Table 226,30-34 below). Their administration can be learned without difficulty, and they can be conducted with relative ease to provide insight into a patient’s cognitive abilities and deficits.
The most commonly used cognitive screening tool is the Folstein Mini–Mental State Exam (MMSE).30 With administration taking about 15 minutes, the MMSE includes assessment of attention, orientation, registration, recall/short-term memory, language, and visuospatial construction. Clinicians will find this tool most useful in assessing the individual with suspected early dementia and to follow progression through the early and middle stages of cognitive decline in those with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementing disorders.
The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is perhaps the simplest test to administer.29,32 The patient is given a blank sheet of paper and asked to draw a large circle, then to write numbers inside the circle so that it resembles a face of a clock. Once this is completed, the patient is instructed to “draw the hands on the clock to read ten past eleven.”
The Mini-Cog Test (with instructions available at http://geriatrics.uthscsa.edu/tools/MINICog.pdf) includes the clock-drawing task and a three-word recall, with a simple scoring algorithm.33 Ability to recall all three words, or to recall one or two words with normal results on the clock test, represents a negative screening result for dementia. Conversely, an inability to recall any of the three words, or ability to recall only one or two words with an abnormal clock test, is considered a positive screen for dementia. The Mini-Cog is a good tool for identification of early dementia, but not useful for following changes in individuals identified with cognitive impairment.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was originally designed as a brief screening instrument for mild cognitive impairment.34 It is a single-page, 30-point test, available in multiple languages (with several versions in some languages) at www.mocatest.org. The MoCA includes assessment of short-term memory, visuospatial ability, executive function, attention, concentration, working memory, language, and orientation. A score of 25 or lower is considered subnormal.
The Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) has also been shown to have better sensitivity than the MMSE for early cognitive changes.26 This 11-item tool, with a maximum score of 30 points, includes assessment of seven cognitive domains: orientation, recall, attention, calculation, fluency, language, and visuospatial construction. The five-item delayed recall in the SLUMS has been shown to be an excellent discriminator of those with normal cognition versus mild cognitive change. It is available for general use with no fee; currently, it is widely used by the Veterans Administration system.41
The General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG)27 is a unique two-part tool that includes questions for the patient and for someone who knows the patient well (“informant”). The patient items include memory/recall, orientation, and visuospatial tasks. The six informant questions ask about recall, language, and functional abilities. The GPCOG has been shown to have sensitivity and specificity similar to those of the MMSE27; as its name indicates, it is designed and best suited for screening in a family medicine or general internal medicine practice.
The Memory Impairment Screen (MIS)28 uses a four-item memory recall with simple scoring of 0 to 8, based on the formula: 2x [the number recalled spontaneously) + (the number recalled with cuing)]. It takes less than five minutes to administer, making it a useful tool to screen for suspected memory problems in a busy setting, such as an emergency room. However, the sole reliance on memory, without screening for any other areas of cognition (especially executive function or visuospatial copying), significantly limits the usefulness of the MIS as a general cognitive screening tool.
The cognitive screening instruments described thus far were all designed to be administered in person in a medical setting (office, clinic, or hospital). The 11-item Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS)42 was developed as a brief (taking less than 10 minutes) standardized test of cognitive function, specifically suited for situations in which in-person screening is not possible (eg, for patients who are unable to appear in person for clinical follow-up).42-44 The modified TICS (TICS-M), which includes 13 items, has been shown to have less of a ceiling effect than the MMSE.45 It has also been shown to be a cost-effective screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.46
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale is a useful tool for staging cognitive decline, regardless of the patient’s diagnosis.47 It uses a 0-to-5 rating system in which 0 is considered normal and 5 represents profound impairment/total dependence (see Table 4,47-49 below). The CDR rating system addresses three areas of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment) and three areas of function (community affairs, home and hobbies, personal care). This tool is very helpful to explain to families where an individual with cognitive impairment is in the course of the disease, and what to expect and plan for in the future as the condition progresses. A comparison of CDR level and cognitive screening test scores is presented in Table 5.30,31,34,49
Clinicians in all settings need to become familiar with the use and interpretation of readily available instruments for cognitive screening. None of the tools reviewed is diagnostic in itself, and no one tool is appropriate for all patients in all settings. Familiarity with the components of the most commonly used cognitive screening tools and associated clinical instruments will aid the clinician in the appropriate use and interpretation of these to improve clinical care and outcomes for patients.
1. Alzheimer’s Association. 2012 Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures. www.alz.org/downloads/facts_figures_2012.pdf. Accessed December 11, 2012.
The purpose of cognitive screening tests is to aid the clinician in early detection of cognitive change as a first step toward accurate diagnosis—a process that requires further assessment. Such changes may herald the beginning of a dementia, such as Alzheimer’s disease, or may indicate an increased risk for delirium, such as in the postoperative setting,6 or functional decline with accompanying safety concerns.7 Early identification of cognitive changes provides an opportunity for case finding, crisis avoidance, and identification of patients for earlier intervention and management, including a discussion of goals with the patient, and assurance that advance directives are complete and accurate.
There is no clear consensus on who should undergo cognitive screening or how frequently it should be carried out. Screening should be targeted at individuals who are at greatest risk for either progressive dementia or delirium. Advancing age is a known risk factor for dementia, but there is no agreement on a specific age at which to initiate cognitive screening. In patients older than 80, there is a 25% to 50% prevalence of dementia,1,11,12 thus suggesting that cognitive screening should be initiated before this age. Furthermore, clinicians who provide medical care for patients of advanced age must be increasingly attentive to the possible presence of cognitive decline.
There is no single, ideal cognitive screening tool that can be recommended for use in every clinical setting. However, the ideal tool would have high sensitivity (ie, the proportion of those with impairment correctly classified as impaired), high specificity (the proportion of those who are unimpaired correctly identified as not having cognitive problems; see Table 1,24-29 below), and a high positive predictive value (proportion identified by screening as impaired who really have cognitive impairment). Additionally, such a tool should be easy to administer and score, and should take a minimum amount of time to conduct in our time-pressured clinical environment.
Cognitive screening does involve some risk, and every tool has known limitations. A significant barrier can be the administration time required, possibly ranging from five to 20 minutes. There is a potential for false-positive results, and there can be distress and stigma associated with a diagnosis of dementia, for both patients and families.
A variety of tools are available for bedside/clinical assessment of cognition (see Table 226,30-34 below). Their administration can be learned without difficulty, and they can be conducted with relative ease to provide insight into a patient’s cognitive abilities and deficits.
The most commonly used cognitive screening tool is the Folstein Mini–Mental State Exam (MMSE).30 With administration taking about 15 minutes, the MMSE includes assessment of attention, orientation, registration, recall/short-term memory, language, and visuospatial construction. Clinicians will find this tool most useful in assessing the individual with suspected early dementia and to follow progression through the early and middle stages of cognitive decline in those with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementing disorders.
The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is perhaps the simplest test to administer.29,32 The patient is given a blank sheet of paper and asked to draw a large circle, then to write numbers inside the circle so that it resembles a face of a clock. Once this is completed, the patient is instructed to “draw the hands on the clock to read ten past eleven.”
The Mini-Cog Test (with instructions available at http://geriatrics.uthscsa.edu/tools/MINICog.pdf) includes the clock-drawing task and a three-word recall, with a simple scoring algorithm.33 Ability to recall all three words, or to recall one or two words with normal results on the clock test, represents a negative screening result for dementia. Conversely, an inability to recall any of the three words, or ability to recall only one or two words with an abnormal clock test, is considered a positive screen for dementia. The Mini-Cog is a good tool for identification of early dementia, but not useful for following changes in individuals identified with cognitive impairment.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was originally designed as a brief screening instrument for mild cognitive impairment.34 It is a single-page, 30-point test, available in multiple languages (with several versions in some languages) at www.mocatest.org. The MoCA includes assessment of short-term memory, visuospatial ability, executive function, attention, concentration, working memory, language, and orientation. A score of 25 or lower is considered subnormal.
The Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) has also been shown to have better sensitivity than the MMSE for early cognitive changes.26 This 11-item tool, with a maximum score of 30 points, includes assessment of seven cognitive domains: orientation, recall, attention, calculation, fluency, language, and visuospatial construction. The five-item delayed recall in the SLUMS has been shown to be an excellent discriminator of those with normal cognition versus mild cognitive change. It is available for general use with no fee; currently, it is widely used by the Veterans Administration system.41
The General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG)27 is a unique two-part tool that includes questions for the patient and for someone who knows the patient well (“informant”). The patient items include memory/recall, orientation, and visuospatial tasks. The six informant questions ask about recall, language, and functional abilities. The GPCOG has been shown to have sensitivity and specificity similar to those of the MMSE27; as its name indicates, it is designed and best suited for screening in a family medicine or general internal medicine practice.
The Memory Impairment Screen (MIS)28 uses a four-item memory recall with simple scoring of 0 to 8, based on the formula: 2x [the number recalled spontaneously) + (the number recalled with cuing)]. It takes less than five minutes to administer, making it a useful tool to screen for suspected memory problems in a busy setting, such as an emergency room. However, the sole reliance on memory, without screening for any other areas of cognition (especially executive function or visuospatial copying), significantly limits the usefulness of the MIS as a general cognitive screening tool.
The cognitive screening instruments described thus far were all designed to be administered in person in a medical setting (office, clinic, or hospital). The 11-item Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS)42 was developed as a brief (taking less than 10 minutes) standardized test of cognitive function, specifically suited for situations in which in-person screening is not possible (eg, for patients who are unable to appear in person for clinical follow-up).42-44 The modified TICS (TICS-M), which includes 13 items, has been shown to have less of a ceiling effect than the MMSE.45 It has also been shown to be a cost-effective screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.46
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale is a useful tool for staging cognitive decline, regardless of the patient’s diagnosis.47 It uses a 0-to-5 rating system in which 0 is considered normal and 5 represents profound impairment/total dependence (see Table 4,47-49 below). The CDR rating system addresses three areas of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment) and three areas of function (community affairs, home and hobbies, personal care). This tool is very helpful to explain to families where an individual with cognitive impairment is in the course of the disease, and what to expect and plan for in the future as the condition progresses. A comparison of CDR level and cognitive screening test scores is presented in Table 5.30,31,34,49
Clinicians in all settings need to become familiar with the use and interpretation of readily available instruments for cognitive screening. None of the tools reviewed is diagnostic in itself, and no one tool is appropriate for all patients in all settings. Familiarity with the components of the most commonly used cognitive screening tools and associated clinical instruments will aid the clinician in the appropriate use and interpretation of these to improve clinical care and outcomes for patients.
1. Alzheimer’s Association. 2012 Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures. www.alz.org/downloads/facts_figures_2012.pdf. Accessed December 11, 2012.