The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease increased significantly among Americans aged 67 years and older from 2001 to 2018, based on data from more than 25 million Medicare beneficiaries.

FatCamera/Getty Images

The worldwide prevalence – or rate of existing cases – of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increased from 3.7 million in 1990 to 6.8 million in 2017, wrote Fang Xu, PhD, of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and colleagues. “As the prevalence increases with age group, it is important to understand the disease epidemiology among the older population,” they said.

In a study published in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, the researchers reviewed 2018 Medicare data for 25.1 million beneficiaries aged 67 years and older to assess prevalence trends overall and by race and ethnicity. Over the study period, the study population ranged from 23.7 million persons in 2009 to 25.6 million persons in 2018. The incidence – or rate of new cases – of IBD peaks at 15-29 years of age, but approximately 10%-15% of new cases develop in adults aged 60 years and older, so the prevalence of IBD overall is expected to increase over time with the aging of the U.S. population, the researchers said.

In this population of beneficiaries, 0.40% overall had a Crohn’s disease diagnosis and 0.64% had an ulcerative colitis diagnosis. The prevalence for both diseases was consistently highest among non-Hispanic Whites, the researchers noted. In addition, the prevalence of Crohn’s disease was highest among younger beneficiaries, while the prevalence of ulcerative colitis was highest among those aged 75-84 years. Other factors associated with higher IBD prevalence were female gender and residence in large fringe metropolitan counties.

The overall age-adjusted prevalence of Crohn’s disease increased over time with an annual percentage change (APC) of 3.4%, and the overall age-adjusted prevalence of ulcerative colitis increased with an APC of 2.8%. When the researchers examined subgroups of race and ethnicity, the annual increases were higher for non-Hispanic Blacks for both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, with APCs of 5.0% and 3.5%, respectively. “The potential rapid increase of disease prevalence in certain racial and ethnic minority groups indicates the need for tailored disease management strategies in these populations,” the researchers noted.

The study findings were limited by several factors including the lack of socioeconomic data, the potential for coding errors related to Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, and the lack of generalizability to all older adults in the United States, the researchers noted. However, “Medicare data are a useful resource to monitor prevalence of IBD over time, understand its prevalence among older adults, assess differences by demographic and geographic characteristics, and have rich information to study health care use,” they concluded.
 

Consider the younger population

The data from the study need to be considered in the context of an accumulation of patients with IBD, and the distinction between incidence and prevalence, Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, of Northwestern University, Chicago, said in an interview.

The overall incidence of IBD is much greater in younger individuals (approximately ages 15-29 years) compared with older adults, he said. Patients with IBD don’t die of it; they grow old with it. Consequently, the prevalence in the Medicare population increases over time, he explained.

The data may be of interest to the practicing clinician, but would be most useful to hospital and Medicare administrators in terms of planning for an increase in the number of older adults surviving into older adulthood with IBD who will require care, he noted.

The researchers and Dr. Hanauer had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Help your patients better understand their IBD treatment options by sharing AGA’s patient education, “Living with IBD,” in the AGA GI Patient Center at www.gastro.org/IBD.

The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease increased significantly among Americans aged 67 years and older from 2001 to 2018, based on data from more than 25 million Medicare beneficiaries.

FatCamera/Getty Images

The worldwide prevalence – or rate of existing cases – of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increased from 3.7 million in 1990 to 6.8 million in 2017, wrote Fang Xu, PhD, of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and colleagues. “As the prevalence increases with age group, it is important to understand the disease epidemiology among the older population,” they said.

In a study published in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, the researchers reviewed 2018 Medicare data for 25.1 million beneficiaries aged 67 years and older to assess prevalence trends overall and by race and ethnicity. Over the study period, the study population ranged from 23.7 million persons in 2009 to 25.6 million persons in 2018. The incidence – or rate of new cases – of IBD peaks at 15-29 years of age, but approximately 10%-15% of new cases develop in adults aged 60 years and older, so the prevalence of IBD overall is expected to increase over time with the aging of the U.S. population, the researchers said.

In this population of beneficiaries, 0.40% overall had a Crohn’s disease diagnosis and 0.64% had an ulcerative colitis diagnosis. The prevalence for both diseases was consistently highest among non-Hispanic Whites, the researchers noted. In addition, the prevalence of Crohn’s disease was highest among younger beneficiaries, while the prevalence of ulcerative colitis was highest among those aged 75-84 years. Other factors associated with higher IBD prevalence were female gender and residence in large fringe metropolitan counties.

The overall age-adjusted prevalence of Crohn’s disease increased over time with an annual percentage change (APC) of 3.4%, and the overall age-adjusted prevalence of ulcerative colitis increased with an APC of 2.8%. When the researchers examined subgroups of race and ethnicity, the annual increases were higher for non-Hispanic Blacks for both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, with APCs of 5.0% and 3.5%, respectively. “The potential rapid increase of disease prevalence in certain racial and ethnic minority groups indicates the need for tailored disease management strategies in these populations,” the researchers noted.

The study findings were limited by several factors including the lack of socioeconomic data, the potential for coding errors related to Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, and the lack of generalizability to all older adults in the United States, the researchers noted. However, “Medicare data are a useful resource to monitor prevalence of IBD over time, understand its prevalence among older adults, assess differences by demographic and geographic characteristics, and have rich information to study health care use,” they concluded.
 

Consider the younger population

The data from the study need to be considered in the context of an accumulation of patients with IBD, and the distinction between incidence and prevalence, Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, of Northwestern University, Chicago, said in an interview.

The overall incidence of IBD is much greater in younger individuals (approximately ages 15-29 years) compared with older adults, he said. Patients with IBD don’t die of it; they grow old with it. Consequently, the prevalence in the Medicare population increases over time, he explained.

The data may be of interest to the practicing clinician, but would be most useful to hospital and Medicare administrators in terms of planning for an increase in the number of older adults surviving into older adulthood with IBD who will require care, he noted.

The researchers and Dr. Hanauer had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Help your patients better understand their IBD treatment options by sharing AGA’s patient education, “Living with IBD,” in the AGA GI Patient Center at www.gastro.org/IBD.

The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease increased significantly among Americans aged 67 years and older from 2001 to 2018, based on data from more than 25 million Medicare beneficiaries.

FatCamera/Getty Images

The worldwide prevalence – or rate of existing cases – of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increased from 3.7 million in 1990 to 6.8 million in 2017, wrote Fang Xu, PhD, of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and colleagues. “As the prevalence increases with age group, it is important to understand the disease epidemiology among the older population,” they said.

In a study published in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, the researchers reviewed 2018 Medicare data for 25.1 million beneficiaries aged 67 years and older to assess prevalence trends overall and by race and ethnicity. Over the study period, the study population ranged from 23.7 million persons in 2009 to 25.6 million persons in 2018. The incidence – or rate of new cases – of IBD peaks at 15-29 years of age, but approximately 10%-15% of new cases develop in adults aged 60 years and older, so the prevalence of IBD overall is expected to increase over time with the aging of the U.S. population, the researchers said.

In this population of beneficiaries, 0.40% overall had a Crohn’s disease diagnosis and 0.64% had an ulcerative colitis diagnosis. The prevalence for both diseases was consistently highest among non-Hispanic Whites, the researchers noted. In addition, the prevalence of Crohn’s disease was highest among younger beneficiaries, while the prevalence of ulcerative colitis was highest among those aged 75-84 years. Other factors associated with higher IBD prevalence were female gender and residence in large fringe metropolitan counties.

The overall age-adjusted prevalence of Crohn’s disease increased over time with an annual percentage change (APC) of 3.4%, and the overall age-adjusted prevalence of ulcerative colitis increased with an APC of 2.8%. When the researchers examined subgroups of race and ethnicity, the annual increases were higher for non-Hispanic Blacks for both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, with APCs of 5.0% and 3.5%, respectively. “The potential rapid increase of disease prevalence in certain racial and ethnic minority groups indicates the need for tailored disease management strategies in these populations,” the researchers noted.

The study findings were limited by several factors including the lack of socioeconomic data, the potential for coding errors related to Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, and the lack of generalizability to all older adults in the United States, the researchers noted. However, “Medicare data are a useful resource to monitor prevalence of IBD over time, understand its prevalence among older adults, assess differences by demographic and geographic characteristics, and have rich information to study health care use,” they concluded.
 

Consider the younger population

The data from the study need to be considered in the context of an accumulation of patients with IBD, and the distinction between incidence and prevalence, Stephen B. Hanauer, MD, of Northwestern University, Chicago, said in an interview.

The overall incidence of IBD is much greater in younger individuals (approximately ages 15-29 years) compared with older adults, he said. Patients with IBD don’t die of it; they grow old with it. Consequently, the prevalence in the Medicare population increases over time, he explained.

The data may be of interest to the practicing clinician, but would be most useful to hospital and Medicare administrators in terms of planning for an increase in the number of older adults surviving into older adulthood with IBD who will require care, he noted.

The researchers and Dr. Hanauer had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Help your patients better understand their IBD treatment options by sharing AGA’s patient education, “Living with IBD,” in the AGA GI Patient Center at www.gastro.org/IBD.

Key clinical point: Increased levels of prothrombin induced by vitamin K deficiency or antagonist- II (PIVKA-II) identified patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: Median PIVKA-II serum levels were significantly higher in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (181.50 mAU/mL) vs patients with benign (noncancerous) liver disease (28.60 mAU/mL) or healthy controls (21.82 mAU/mL; both P less than .0001). When comparing HCC patients and healthy controls, PIVKA-II was markedly more sensitive than AFP (83.9% vs 64.3%, respectively), and somewhat more specific (91.5% vs 84.7%). Compared with measuring AFP alone, measuring both PIVKA-II and AFP demonstrated much greater sensitivity (81.95%) and slightly greater specificity (89.3%).

Study details: The researchers used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to measure serum PIVKA-II levels in 168 patients with HCC, 150 patients with benign liver disease, and 153 healthy controls.

Disclosures: Funding sources were described as inapplicable. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source: Feng H et al. BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 13. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08138-3

Key clinical point: Increased levels of prothrombin induced by vitamin K deficiency or antagonist- II (PIVKA-II) identified patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: Median PIVKA-II serum levels were significantly higher in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (181.50 mAU/mL) vs patients with benign (noncancerous) liver disease (28.60 mAU/mL) or healthy controls (21.82 mAU/mL; both P less than .0001). When comparing HCC patients and healthy controls, PIVKA-II was markedly more sensitive than AFP (83.9% vs 64.3%, respectively), and somewhat more specific (91.5% vs 84.7%). Compared with measuring AFP alone, measuring both PIVKA-II and AFP demonstrated much greater sensitivity (81.95%) and slightly greater specificity (89.3%).

Study details: The researchers used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to measure serum PIVKA-II levels in 168 patients with HCC, 150 patients with benign liver disease, and 153 healthy controls.

Disclosures: Funding sources were described as inapplicable. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source: Feng H et al. BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 13. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08138-3

Key clinical point: Increased levels of prothrombin induced by vitamin K deficiency or antagonist- II (PIVKA-II) identified patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: Median PIVKA-II serum levels were significantly higher in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (181.50 mAU/mL) vs patients with benign (noncancerous) liver disease (28.60 mAU/mL) or healthy controls (21.82 mAU/mL; both P less than .0001). When comparing HCC patients and healthy controls, PIVKA-II was markedly more sensitive than AFP (83.9% vs 64.3%, respectively), and somewhat more specific (91.5% vs 84.7%). Compared with measuring AFP alone, measuring both PIVKA-II and AFP demonstrated much greater sensitivity (81.95%) and slightly greater specificity (89.3%).

Study details: The researchers used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to measure serum PIVKA-II levels in 168 patients with HCC, 150 patients with benign liver disease, and 153 healthy controls.

Disclosures: Funding sources were described as inapplicable. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source: Feng H et al. BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 13. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08138-3

Key clinical point: Spleen stiffness, a measure of portal hypertension, was a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among patients with advanced liver disease whose chronic hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) was successfully treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAA).

Major finding: The incidence of HCC was 14% over a median of 41.5 months of follow-up. Six months after successful DAA treatment, spleen stiffness greater than 42 kPa was associated with a small but statistically significant increase in risk for HCC (hazard ratio, 1.025). Among patients whose liver stiffness exceeded 10 kPa, increased spleen stiffness was a risk factor for HCC, but any additional increase in liver stiffness (10-20 kPa vs >20 kPa) was not.

Study details: This was a single-center retrospective study of 140 patients with advanced chronic liver disease whose HCV was successfully treated with DAA. Liver and spleen stiffness were measured at baseline and 6 months after end of treatment.

Disclosures: The researchers reported receiving no funding for the study and stated that they had no conflicts of interest.

Source: Dajti E et al. JHEP Rep. 2021 Apr 14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100289

Key clinical point: Spleen stiffness, a measure of portal hypertension, was a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among patients with advanced liver disease whose chronic hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) was successfully treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAA).

Major finding: The incidence of HCC was 14% over a median of 41.5 months of follow-up. Six months after successful DAA treatment, spleen stiffness greater than 42 kPa was associated with a small but statistically significant increase in risk for HCC (hazard ratio, 1.025). Among patients whose liver stiffness exceeded 10 kPa, increased spleen stiffness was a risk factor for HCC, but any additional increase in liver stiffness (10-20 kPa vs >20 kPa) was not.

Study details: This was a single-center retrospective study of 140 patients with advanced chronic liver disease whose HCV was successfully treated with DAA. Liver and spleen stiffness were measured at baseline and 6 months after end of treatment.

Disclosures: The researchers reported receiving no funding for the study and stated that they had no conflicts of interest.

Source: Dajti E et al. JHEP Rep. 2021 Apr 14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100289

Key clinical point: Spleen stiffness, a measure of portal hypertension, was a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among patients with advanced liver disease whose chronic hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) was successfully treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAA).

Major finding: The incidence of HCC was 14% over a median of 41.5 months of follow-up. Six months after successful DAA treatment, spleen stiffness greater than 42 kPa was associated with a small but statistically significant increase in risk for HCC (hazard ratio, 1.025). Among patients whose liver stiffness exceeded 10 kPa, increased spleen stiffness was a risk factor for HCC, but any additional increase in liver stiffness (10-20 kPa vs >20 kPa) was not.

Study details: This was a single-center retrospective study of 140 patients with advanced chronic liver disease whose HCV was successfully treated with DAA. Liver and spleen stiffness were measured at baseline and 6 months after end of treatment.

Disclosures: The researchers reported receiving no funding for the study and stated that they had no conflicts of interest.

Source: Dajti E et al. JHEP Rep. 2021 Apr 14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100289

Key clinical point: Consider testing for hepatitis D virus in patients receiving nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NA) for chronic hepatitis B virus infection (HBV).

Major finding: Prevalences of anti-HDV and HDV RNA positivity were 2.3% and 1.0%, respectively. Five-year cumulative rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were 22.2% among patients with detectable HDV RNA vs 7.3% among patients with undetectable HDV RNA (P = .01).

Study details: This was a single-center retrospective study of 1,349 patients receiving NA for chronic HBV.

Disclosures: The Center for Liquid Biopsy, Center for Cancer Research, Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, and Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital provided funding. Two coinvestigators disclosed ties to Abbott, BMS, Gilead, Merck, AbbVie, Roche, and IPSEN. The other investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source: Jang T-Y et al. Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87679-w

Key clinical point: Consider testing for hepatitis D virus in patients receiving nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NA) for chronic hepatitis B virus infection (HBV).

Major finding: Prevalences of anti-HDV and HDV RNA positivity were 2.3% and 1.0%, respectively. Five-year cumulative rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were 22.2% among patients with detectable HDV RNA vs 7.3% among patients with undetectable HDV RNA (P = .01).

Study details: This was a single-center retrospective study of 1,349 patients receiving NA for chronic HBV.

Disclosures: The Center for Liquid Biopsy, Center for Cancer Research, Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, and Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital provided funding. Two coinvestigators disclosed ties to Abbott, BMS, Gilead, Merck, AbbVie, Roche, and IPSEN. The other investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source: Jang T-Y et al. Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87679-w

Key clinical point: Consider testing for hepatitis D virus in patients receiving nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NA) for chronic hepatitis B virus infection (HBV).

Major finding: Prevalences of anti-HDV and HDV RNA positivity were 2.3% and 1.0%, respectively. Five-year cumulative rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were 22.2% among patients with detectable HDV RNA vs 7.3% among patients with undetectable HDV RNA (P = .01).

Study details: This was a single-center retrospective study of 1,349 patients receiving NA for chronic HBV.

Disclosures: The Center for Liquid Biopsy, Center for Cancer Research, Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, and Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital provided funding. Two coinvestigators disclosed ties to Abbott, BMS, Gilead, Merck, AbbVie, Roche, and IPSEN. The other investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source: Jang T-Y et al. Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87679-w

Key clinical point: GINS complex subunit 4 (GINS4) is a prognostic biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: GINS4 was overexpressed in HCC. Higher GINS4 expression correlated with higher TNM stage and histologic grade (P less than .0001). Kaplan-Meier survival curves linked higher GINS4 expression with worse overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 1.84; P = .004).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective study of 1,084 patients with HCC, as well as patients with hepatic cirrhosis and healthy controls. GINS4 was analyzed by using existing publicly available databases and immunohistochemistry of specimens from 35 of the HCC patients.

Disclosures: The National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Hunan Province Science and Technology plan provided funding. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source: Zhang Z et al. Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 25. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.654185

Key clinical point: GINS complex subunit 4 (GINS4) is a prognostic biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: GINS4 was overexpressed in HCC. Higher GINS4 expression correlated with higher TNM stage and histologic grade (P less than .0001). Kaplan-Meier survival curves linked higher GINS4 expression with worse overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 1.84; P = .004).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective study of 1,084 patients with HCC, as well as patients with hepatic cirrhosis and healthy controls. GINS4 was analyzed by using existing publicly available databases and immunohistochemistry of specimens from 35 of the HCC patients.

Disclosures: The National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Hunan Province Science and Technology plan provided funding. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source: Zhang Z et al. Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 25. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.654185

Key clinical point: GINS complex subunit 4 (GINS4) is a prognostic biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: GINS4 was overexpressed in HCC. Higher GINS4 expression correlated with higher TNM stage and histologic grade (P less than .0001). Kaplan-Meier survival curves linked higher GINS4 expression with worse overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 1.84; P = .004).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective study of 1,084 patients with HCC, as well as patients with hepatic cirrhosis and healthy controls. GINS4 was analyzed by using existing publicly available databases and immunohistochemistry of specimens from 35 of the HCC patients.

Disclosures: The National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Hunan Province Science and Technology plan provided funding. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source: Zhang Z et al. Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 25. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.654185

Key clinical point: Compared with lenvatinib alone, triple combination therapy with lenvatinib, toripalimab, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy appeared to demonstrate acceptable safety and improved survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: Median progression-free survival was 11.1 months with triple combination therapy vs 5.1 months with lenvatinib alone (hazard ratio, 0.48; P less than .001). Compared with lenvatinib alone, triple combination therapy was associated with a significantly higher rate of grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea.

Study details: Findings come from a retrospective study of 157 patients with unresectable HCC, of whom 86 received lenvatinib and 71 received lenvatinib, toripalimab, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with FOLFAX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil).

Disclosures: The study was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, and National Science and Technology Major Project of China. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source:  He M-K et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Mar 25. doi: 10.1177/17588359211002720

Key clinical point: Compared with lenvatinib alone, triple combination therapy with lenvatinib, toripalimab, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy appeared to demonstrate acceptable safety and improved survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: Median progression-free survival was 11.1 months with triple combination therapy vs 5.1 months with lenvatinib alone (hazard ratio, 0.48; P less than .001). Compared with lenvatinib alone, triple combination therapy was associated with a significantly higher rate of grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea.

Study details: Findings come from a retrospective study of 157 patients with unresectable HCC, of whom 86 received lenvatinib and 71 received lenvatinib, toripalimab, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with FOLFAX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil).

Disclosures: The study was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, and National Science and Technology Major Project of China. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source:  He M-K et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Mar 25. doi: 10.1177/17588359211002720

Key clinical point: Compared with lenvatinib alone, triple combination therapy with lenvatinib, toripalimab, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy appeared to demonstrate acceptable safety and improved survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: Median progression-free survival was 11.1 months with triple combination therapy vs 5.1 months with lenvatinib alone (hazard ratio, 0.48; P less than .001). Compared with lenvatinib alone, triple combination therapy was associated with a significantly higher rate of grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea.

Study details: Findings come from a retrospective study of 157 patients with unresectable HCC, of whom 86 received lenvatinib and 71 received lenvatinib, toripalimab, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with FOLFAX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil).

Disclosures: The study was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, and National Science and Technology Major Project of China. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source:  He M-K et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Mar 25. doi: 10.1177/17588359211002720

Physicians’ trust in health care system leaders has taken a steep drop during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a survey conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago on behalf of the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation.

Survey results, released May 21, indicate that 30% of physicians say their trust in the U.S. health care system and health care leadership has decreased during the pandemic. Only 18% reported an increase in trust.

Physicians, however, have great trust in their fellow clinicians.

In the survey of 600 physicians, 94% said they trust doctors within their practice; 85% trusted doctors outside of their practice; and 89% trusted nurses. That trust increased during the pandemic, with 41% saying their trust in fellow physicians rose and 37% saying their trust in nurses did.

In a separate survey, NORC asked patients about their trust in various aspects of health care. Among 2,069 respondents, a wide majority reported that they trust doctors (84%) and nurses (85%), but only 64% trusted the health care system as a whole. One in three consumers (32%) said their trust in the health care system decreased during the pandemic, compared with 11% who said their trust increased.

The ABIM Foundation released the research findings on May 21 as part of Building Trust, a national campaign that aims to boost trust among patients, clinicians, system leaders, researchers, and others.

Richard J. Baron, MD, president and chief executive officer of the ABIM Foundation, said in an interview, “Clearly there’s lower trust in health care organization leaders and executives, and that’s troubling.

“Science by itself is not enough,” he said. “Becoming trustworthy has to be a core project of everybody in health care.”

Deterioration in physicians’ trust during the pandemic comes in part from failed promises of adequate personal protective equipment and some physicians’ loss of income as a result of the crisis, Dr. Baron said.

He added that the vaccine rollout was very uneven and that policies as to which elective procedures could be performed were handled differently in different parts of the country.

He also noted that, early on, transparency was lacking as to how many COVID patients hospitals were treating, which may have contributed to the decrease in trust in the system.
 

Fear of being known as ‘the COVID hospital’

Hospitals were afraid of being known as “the COVID hospital” and losing patients who were afraid to come there, Dr. Baron said.

He said the COVID-19 epidemic exacerbated problems regarding trust, but that trust has been declining for some time. The Building Trust campaign will focus on solutions in breaches of trust as physicians move increasingly toward being employees of huge systems, according to Dr. Baron.

However, trust works both ways, Dr. Baron notes. Physicians can be champions for their health care system or “throw the system under the bus,” he said.

For example, if a patient complains about the appointment system, clinicians who trust their institutions may say the system usually works and that they will try to make sure the patient has a better experience next time. Clinicians without trust may say they agree that the health care system doesn’t know what it is doing, and patients may further lose confidence when physicians validate their complaint, and patients may then go elsewhere.
 

78% of patients trust primary care doctor

When asked whether they trust their primary care physician, 78% of patients said yes. However, trust in doctors was higher among people who were older (90%), White (82%), or had high income (89%). Among people reporting lower trust, 25% said their physician spends too little time with them, and 14% said their doctor does not know or listen to them.

The survey shows that government agencies have work to do to earn trust. Responses indicate that 43% of physicians said they have “complete trust” in government health care agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which is substantially higher than other parts of the health care system. However, trust in agencies declined for 43% of physician respondents and increased for 21%.

Dhruv Khullar, MD, MPP, of the department of health policy and economics at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York, told this news organization the survey results match what he sees anecdotally in medicine – that physicians have been losing trust in the system but not in their colleagues.

He said the sample size of 600 is enough to be influential, though he said he would like to know the response rate, which was not calculated for this survey.

He added that, in large part, physicians’ lack of trust in their systems may come from generally being asked to see more patients and to meet more metrics during the same or shorter periods.

Physicians’ lack of trust in the system can have significant consequences, he said. It can lead to burnout, which has been linked with poorer quality of care and physician turnover, he noted.

COVID-19 led some physicians to wonder whether their system had their best interests at heart, insofar as access to adequate medicines and supplies as well as emotional support were inconsistent, Dr. Khullar said.

He said that to regain trust health care systems need to ask themselves questions in three areas. The first is whether their goals are focused on the best interest of the organization or the best interest of the patient.

“Next is competency,” Dr. Khullar said. “Maybe your motives are right, but are you able to deliver? Are you delivering a good product, whether clinical services or something else?”

The third area is transparency, he said. “Are you going to be honest and forthright in what we’re doing and where we’re going?”

Caroline Pearson, senior vice president of health care strategy for NORC, said the emailed survey was conducted between Dec. 29, 2020, and Feb. 5, 2021, with a health care survey partner that maintains a nationwide panel of physicians across specialties.

She said this report is fairly novel insofar as surveys are more typically conducted regarding patients’ trust of their doctors or of the health care system.

Ms. Pearson said because health care is delivered in teams, understanding the level of trust among the entities helps ensure that care will be delivered effectively and seamlessly with high quality.

“We want our patients to trust our doctors, but we really want doctors to trust each other and trust the hospitals and systems in which they’re working,” she said.

Dr. Baron, Ms. Pearson, and Dr. Khullar report no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Physicians’ trust in health care system leaders has taken a steep drop during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a survey conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago on behalf of the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation.

Survey results, released May 21, indicate that 30% of physicians say their trust in the U.S. health care system and health care leadership has decreased during the pandemic. Only 18% reported an increase in trust.

Physicians, however, have great trust in their fellow clinicians.

In the survey of 600 physicians, 94% said they trust doctors within their practice; 85% trusted doctors outside of their practice; and 89% trusted nurses. That trust increased during the pandemic, with 41% saying their trust in fellow physicians rose and 37% saying their trust in nurses did.

In a separate survey, NORC asked patients about their trust in various aspects of health care. Among 2,069 respondents, a wide majority reported that they trust doctors (84%) and nurses (85%), but only 64% trusted the health care system as a whole. One in three consumers (32%) said their trust in the health care system decreased during the pandemic, compared with 11% who said their trust increased.

The ABIM Foundation released the research findings on May 21 as part of Building Trust, a national campaign that aims to boost trust among patients, clinicians, system leaders, researchers, and others.

Richard J. Baron, MD, president and chief executive officer of the ABIM Foundation, said in an interview, “Clearly there’s lower trust in health care organization leaders and executives, and that’s troubling.

“Science by itself is not enough,” he said. “Becoming trustworthy has to be a core project of everybody in health care.”

Deterioration in physicians’ trust during the pandemic comes in part from failed promises of adequate personal protective equipment and some physicians’ loss of income as a result of the crisis, Dr. Baron said.

He added that the vaccine rollout was very uneven and that policies as to which elective procedures could be performed were handled differently in different parts of the country.

He also noted that, early on, transparency was lacking as to how many COVID patients hospitals were treating, which may have contributed to the decrease in trust in the system.
 

Fear of being known as ‘the COVID hospital’

Hospitals were afraid of being known as “the COVID hospital” and losing patients who were afraid to come there, Dr. Baron said.

He said the COVID-19 epidemic exacerbated problems regarding trust, but that trust has been declining for some time. The Building Trust campaign will focus on solutions in breaches of trust as physicians move increasingly toward being employees of huge systems, according to Dr. Baron.

However, trust works both ways, Dr. Baron notes. Physicians can be champions for their health care system or “throw the system under the bus,” he said.

For example, if a patient complains about the appointment system, clinicians who trust their institutions may say the system usually works and that they will try to make sure the patient has a better experience next time. Clinicians without trust may say they agree that the health care system doesn’t know what it is doing, and patients may further lose confidence when physicians validate their complaint, and patients may then go elsewhere.
 

78% of patients trust primary care doctor

When asked whether they trust their primary care physician, 78% of patients said yes. However, trust in doctors was higher among people who were older (90%), White (82%), or had high income (89%). Among people reporting lower trust, 25% said their physician spends too little time with them, and 14% said their doctor does not know or listen to them.

The survey shows that government agencies have work to do to earn trust. Responses indicate that 43% of physicians said they have “complete trust” in government health care agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which is substantially higher than other parts of the health care system. However, trust in agencies declined for 43% of physician respondents and increased for 21%.

Dhruv Khullar, MD, MPP, of the department of health policy and economics at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York, told this news organization the survey results match what he sees anecdotally in medicine – that physicians have been losing trust in the system but not in their colleagues.

He said the sample size of 600 is enough to be influential, though he said he would like to know the response rate, which was not calculated for this survey.

He added that, in large part, physicians’ lack of trust in their systems may come from generally being asked to see more patients and to meet more metrics during the same or shorter periods.

Physicians’ lack of trust in the system can have significant consequences, he said. It can lead to burnout, which has been linked with poorer quality of care and physician turnover, he noted.

COVID-19 led some physicians to wonder whether their system had their best interests at heart, insofar as access to adequate medicines and supplies as well as emotional support were inconsistent, Dr. Khullar said.

He said that to regain trust health care systems need to ask themselves questions in three areas. The first is whether their goals are focused on the best interest of the organization or the best interest of the patient.

“Next is competency,” Dr. Khullar said. “Maybe your motives are right, but are you able to deliver? Are you delivering a good product, whether clinical services or something else?”

The third area is transparency, he said. “Are you going to be honest and forthright in what we’re doing and where we’re going?”

Caroline Pearson, senior vice president of health care strategy for NORC, said the emailed survey was conducted between Dec. 29, 2020, and Feb. 5, 2021, with a health care survey partner that maintains a nationwide panel of physicians across specialties.

She said this report is fairly novel insofar as surveys are more typically conducted regarding patients’ trust of their doctors or of the health care system.

Ms. Pearson said because health care is delivered in teams, understanding the level of trust among the entities helps ensure that care will be delivered effectively and seamlessly with high quality.

“We want our patients to trust our doctors, but we really want doctors to trust each other and trust the hospitals and systems in which they’re working,” she said.

Dr. Baron, Ms. Pearson, and Dr. Khullar report no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Physicians’ trust in health care system leaders has taken a steep drop during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a survey conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago on behalf of the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation.

Survey results, released May 21, indicate that 30% of physicians say their trust in the U.S. health care system and health care leadership has decreased during the pandemic. Only 18% reported an increase in trust.

Physicians, however, have great trust in their fellow clinicians.

In the survey of 600 physicians, 94% said they trust doctors within their practice; 85% trusted doctors outside of their practice; and 89% trusted nurses. That trust increased during the pandemic, with 41% saying their trust in fellow physicians rose and 37% saying their trust in nurses did.

In a separate survey, NORC asked patients about their trust in various aspects of health care. Among 2,069 respondents, a wide majority reported that they trust doctors (84%) and nurses (85%), but only 64% trusted the health care system as a whole. One in three consumers (32%) said their trust in the health care system decreased during the pandemic, compared with 11% who said their trust increased.

The ABIM Foundation released the research findings on May 21 as part of Building Trust, a national campaign that aims to boost trust among patients, clinicians, system leaders, researchers, and others.

Richard J. Baron, MD, president and chief executive officer of the ABIM Foundation, said in an interview, “Clearly there’s lower trust in health care organization leaders and executives, and that’s troubling.

“Science by itself is not enough,” he said. “Becoming trustworthy has to be a core project of everybody in health care.”

Deterioration in physicians’ trust during the pandemic comes in part from failed promises of adequate personal protective equipment and some physicians’ loss of income as a result of the crisis, Dr. Baron said.

He added that the vaccine rollout was very uneven and that policies as to which elective procedures could be performed were handled differently in different parts of the country.

He also noted that, early on, transparency was lacking as to how many COVID patients hospitals were treating, which may have contributed to the decrease in trust in the system.
 

Fear of being known as ‘the COVID hospital’

Hospitals were afraid of being known as “the COVID hospital” and losing patients who were afraid to come there, Dr. Baron said.

He said the COVID-19 epidemic exacerbated problems regarding trust, but that trust has been declining for some time. The Building Trust campaign will focus on solutions in breaches of trust as physicians move increasingly toward being employees of huge systems, according to Dr. Baron.

However, trust works both ways, Dr. Baron notes. Physicians can be champions for their health care system or “throw the system under the bus,” he said.

For example, if a patient complains about the appointment system, clinicians who trust their institutions may say the system usually works and that they will try to make sure the patient has a better experience next time. Clinicians without trust may say they agree that the health care system doesn’t know what it is doing, and patients may further lose confidence when physicians validate their complaint, and patients may then go elsewhere.
 

78% of patients trust primary care doctor

When asked whether they trust their primary care physician, 78% of patients said yes. However, trust in doctors was higher among people who were older (90%), White (82%), or had high income (89%). Among people reporting lower trust, 25% said their physician spends too little time with them, and 14% said their doctor does not know or listen to them.

The survey shows that government agencies have work to do to earn trust. Responses indicate that 43% of physicians said they have “complete trust” in government health care agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which is substantially higher than other parts of the health care system. However, trust in agencies declined for 43% of physician respondents and increased for 21%.

Dhruv Khullar, MD, MPP, of the department of health policy and economics at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York, told this news organization the survey results match what he sees anecdotally in medicine – that physicians have been losing trust in the system but not in their colleagues.

He said the sample size of 600 is enough to be influential, though he said he would like to know the response rate, which was not calculated for this survey.

He added that, in large part, physicians’ lack of trust in their systems may come from generally being asked to see more patients and to meet more metrics during the same or shorter periods.

Physicians’ lack of trust in the system can have significant consequences, he said. It can lead to burnout, which has been linked with poorer quality of care and physician turnover, he noted.

COVID-19 led some physicians to wonder whether their system had their best interests at heart, insofar as access to adequate medicines and supplies as well as emotional support were inconsistent, Dr. Khullar said.

He said that to regain trust health care systems need to ask themselves questions in three areas. The first is whether their goals are focused on the best interest of the organization or the best interest of the patient.

“Next is competency,” Dr. Khullar said. “Maybe your motives are right, but are you able to deliver? Are you delivering a good product, whether clinical services or something else?”

The third area is transparency, he said. “Are you going to be honest and forthright in what we’re doing and where we’re going?”

Caroline Pearson, senior vice president of health care strategy for NORC, said the emailed survey was conducted between Dec. 29, 2020, and Feb. 5, 2021, with a health care survey partner that maintains a nationwide panel of physicians across specialties.

She said this report is fairly novel insofar as surveys are more typically conducted regarding patients’ trust of their doctors or of the health care system.

Ms. Pearson said because health care is delivered in teams, understanding the level of trust among the entities helps ensure that care will be delivered effectively and seamlessly with high quality.

“We want our patients to trust our doctors, but we really want doctors to trust each other and trust the hospitals and systems in which they’re working,” she said.

Dr. Baron, Ms. Pearson, and Dr. Khullar report no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Key clinical point: Among patients receiving liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), acute rejection conferred a significantly greater likelihood of HCC recurrence.

Major finding: HCC recurred in 28.6% of patients with acute rejections (defined as occurring within 20 months after transplant) vs 13.0% of patients without acute rejections (P = .002). Acute rejection remained a significant risk factor for recurrence in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 2.91).

Study details: Findings come from a retrospective study of 252 patients undergoing liver transplantation for HCC, of whom 91 had histopathologically confirmed acute rejections and 47 had HCC recurrence.

Disclosures: The researchers reported receiving funding for open access publications but no other financial support. The senior author disclosed ties to Merck Serono, Bayer AG, ERBE Elektromedizin, Amgen Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Takeda, Olympus K.K., Medtronic GmbH, and Intuitive Surg. Inc. The other researchers reported having no conflicts.

Source: Gül-Klein S et al. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021 Mar 18. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S292010

Key clinical point: Among patients receiving liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), acute rejection conferred a significantly greater likelihood of HCC recurrence.

Major finding: HCC recurred in 28.6% of patients with acute rejections (defined as occurring within 20 months after transplant) vs 13.0% of patients without acute rejections (P = .002). Acute rejection remained a significant risk factor for recurrence in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 2.91).

Study details: Findings come from a retrospective study of 252 patients undergoing liver transplantation for HCC, of whom 91 had histopathologically confirmed acute rejections and 47 had HCC recurrence.

Disclosures: The researchers reported receiving funding for open access publications but no other financial support. The senior author disclosed ties to Merck Serono, Bayer AG, ERBE Elektromedizin, Amgen Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Takeda, Olympus K.K., Medtronic GmbH, and Intuitive Surg. Inc. The other researchers reported having no conflicts.

Source: Gül-Klein S et al. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021 Mar 18. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S292010

Key clinical point: Among patients receiving liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), acute rejection conferred a significantly greater likelihood of HCC recurrence.

Major finding: HCC recurred in 28.6% of patients with acute rejections (defined as occurring within 20 months after transplant) vs 13.0% of patients without acute rejections (P = .002). Acute rejection remained a significant risk factor for recurrence in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 2.91).

Study details: Findings come from a retrospective study of 252 patients undergoing liver transplantation for HCC, of whom 91 had histopathologically confirmed acute rejections and 47 had HCC recurrence.

Disclosures: The researchers reported receiving funding for open access publications but no other financial support. The senior author disclosed ties to Merck Serono, Bayer AG, ERBE Elektromedizin, Amgen Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Takeda, Olympus K.K., Medtronic GmbH, and Intuitive Surg. Inc. The other researchers reported having no conflicts.

Source: Gül-Klein S et al. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021 Mar 18. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S292010

Key clinical point: High serum levels of angiopoietin 2 (Ang2) levels identified patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and predicted a shorter time to recurrence after treatment with curative intent.

Major finding: Serum Ang2 levels were significantly higher in patients with HCC vs controls (P less than .001) and patients with chronic liver disease (P less than .001). At the optimal threshold (3.5 ng/mL), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 51%, 84%, and 59.5%, respectively. Higher serum Ang2 levels correlated with significantly shorter recurrence-free survival after ablation therapy, even after controlling for other prognostic factors.

Study details: The researchers reviewed medical charts and used sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure Ang2 levels in stored serum from 275 patients with HCC, 98 patients with chronic liver disease, and 20 controls.

Disclosures: Partial funding came from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the Program for Basic and Clinical Research on Hepatitis from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source: J Ao et al. J Cancer. 2021 Mar 5. doi: 10.7150/jca.56436

Key clinical point: High serum levels of angiopoietin 2 (Ang2) levels identified patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and predicted a shorter time to recurrence after treatment with curative intent.

Major finding: Serum Ang2 levels were significantly higher in patients with HCC vs controls (P less than .001) and patients with chronic liver disease (P less than .001). At the optimal threshold (3.5 ng/mL), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 51%, 84%, and 59.5%, respectively. Higher serum Ang2 levels correlated with significantly shorter recurrence-free survival after ablation therapy, even after controlling for other prognostic factors.

Study details: The researchers reviewed medical charts and used sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure Ang2 levels in stored serum from 275 patients with HCC, 98 patients with chronic liver disease, and 20 controls.

Disclosures: Partial funding came from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the Program for Basic and Clinical Research on Hepatitis from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source: J Ao et al. J Cancer. 2021 Mar 5. doi: 10.7150/jca.56436

Key clinical point: High serum levels of angiopoietin 2 (Ang2) levels identified patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and predicted a shorter time to recurrence after treatment with curative intent.

Major finding: Serum Ang2 levels were significantly higher in patients with HCC vs controls (P less than .001) and patients with chronic liver disease (P less than .001). At the optimal threshold (3.5 ng/mL), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 51%, 84%, and 59.5%, respectively. Higher serum Ang2 levels correlated with significantly shorter recurrence-free survival after ablation therapy, even after controlling for other prognostic factors.

Study details: The researchers reviewed medical charts and used sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure Ang2 levels in stored serum from 275 patients with HCC, 98 patients with chronic liver disease, and 20 controls.

Disclosures: Partial funding came from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the Program for Basic and Clinical Research on Hepatitis from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source: J Ao et al. J Cancer. 2021 Mar 5. doi: 10.7150/jca.56436

Young adults with epilepsy experience higher rates of anxiety, depression, and suicidality, compared with their counterparts in the general population, a new study shows.

The findings, based on a study of 144 young adults with epilepsy (YAWE), was published recently in Epilepsy & Behavior.

“People with epilepsy (PWE) are at a significantly higher risk of experiencing mental health difficulties, compared with healthy controls and individuals with other [long-term conditions] such as asthma and diabetes,” according to Rachel Batchelor, MSc, and Michelle D. Taylor, PhD, of the University of London (England) in Surrey.

Young adulthood, which encompasses people aged 18-25 years, has been identified as “a peak age of onset for anxiety and depression,” but mental health in young adults with epilepsy in particular has not been well studied, they wrote.

In the study, Ms. Batchelor and Dr. Taylor reviewed results of an online survey of 144 young adults with epilepsy aged 18-25 years. The survey measured current mental health symptoms, including anxiety, depression, and suicidality, as well as sociodemographic and epilepsy-related factors, coping strategies, and social support (Epilepsy Behav. 2021 May;118:107911. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107911).

The average age of the respondents was 21.6 years, 61% were female, and 88% were of White British ethnicity. A total of 88 participants were single, 48 were in a relationship, and 8 were married or engaged. About one-third (38%) worked full-time, and 28.5% were full-time university students, 18.8% worked part-time, and 8.3% were unemployed and not students. The average age of seizure onset was 12.4 years.

Overall, 116 (80.6%) of the survey respondents met the criteria for anxiety, 110 (76.4%) for depression, and 51 (35.4%) for suicidality.

Ratings of all three of these conditions were significantly higher in females, compared with males, the researchers noted. Anxiety, depression, and suicidality also were rated higher for individuals who waited more than 1 year vs. less than 1 year for an epilepsy diagnosis from the time of seizure onset, for those suffering from anti-seizure medication side effects vs. no side effects, and for those with comorbid conditions vs. no comorbid conditions.

Avoidant-focused coping strategies were positively correlated with anxiety, depression, and suicidality, while problem-focused coping and meaning-focused coping were negatively correlated, the researchers said. In addition, those who reported greater levels of support from friends had lower rates of anxiety and depression, and those who reported greater levels of support from family had lower rates of suicidality.

The study findings were limited by several factors, including the relatively homogenous population, and the absence of data on current anxiety and depression medications and additional professional support, the researchers noted.

However, the results extend the research on mental health in people with epilepsy, and the study is the first known to focus on the young adult population with epilepsy, they said.

“The high rates of anxiety, depression, and suicidality underscore the need for better integration of mental health provision into epilepsy care,” the researchers wrote. “While it would be premature to base recommendations for treating anxiety, depression, and suicidality in YAWE on the current study, investigating the efficacy of psychological interventions (for example, [acceptance and commitment therapy], [compassion-focused therapy], peer support, and family-based [therapy]) designed to address the psychosocial variables shown to independently predict mental health outcomes in YAWE would be worthy future research avenues,” they concluded.

The study received no outside funding, and the researchers disclosed no financial conflicts.

Young adults with epilepsy experience higher rates of anxiety, depression, and suicidality, compared with their counterparts in the general population, a new study shows.

The findings, based on a study of 144 young adults with epilepsy (YAWE), was published recently in Epilepsy & Behavior.

“People with epilepsy (PWE) are at a significantly higher risk of experiencing mental health difficulties, compared with healthy controls and individuals with other [long-term conditions] such as asthma and diabetes,” according to Rachel Batchelor, MSc, and Michelle D. Taylor, PhD, of the University of London (England) in Surrey.

Young adulthood, which encompasses people aged 18-25 years, has been identified as “a peak age of onset for anxiety and depression,” but mental health in young adults with epilepsy in particular has not been well studied, they wrote.

In the study, Ms. Batchelor and Dr. Taylor reviewed results of an online survey of 144 young adults with epilepsy aged 18-25 years. The survey measured current mental health symptoms, including anxiety, depression, and suicidality, as well as sociodemographic and epilepsy-related factors, coping strategies, and social support (Epilepsy Behav. 2021 May;118:107911. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107911).

The average age of the respondents was 21.6 years, 61% were female, and 88% were of White British ethnicity. A total of 88 participants were single, 48 were in a relationship, and 8 were married or engaged. About one-third (38%) worked full-time, and 28.5% were full-time university students, 18.8% worked part-time, and 8.3% were unemployed and not students. The average age of seizure onset was 12.4 years.

Overall, 116 (80.6%) of the survey respondents met the criteria for anxiety, 110 (76.4%) for depression, and 51 (35.4%) for suicidality.

Ratings of all three of these conditions were significantly higher in females, compared with males, the researchers noted. Anxiety, depression, and suicidality also were rated higher for individuals who waited more than 1 year vs. less than 1 year for an epilepsy diagnosis from the time of seizure onset, for those suffering from anti-seizure medication side effects vs. no side effects, and for those with comorbid conditions vs. no comorbid conditions.

Avoidant-focused coping strategies were positively correlated with anxiety, depression, and suicidality, while problem-focused coping and meaning-focused coping were negatively correlated, the researchers said. In addition, those who reported greater levels of support from friends had lower rates of anxiety and depression, and those who reported greater levels of support from family had lower rates of suicidality.

The study findings were limited by several factors, including the relatively homogenous population, and the absence of data on current anxiety and depression medications and additional professional support, the researchers noted.

However, the results extend the research on mental health in people with epilepsy, and the study is the first known to focus on the young adult population with epilepsy, they said.

“The high rates of anxiety, depression, and suicidality underscore the need for better integration of mental health provision into epilepsy care,” the researchers wrote. “While it would be premature to base recommendations for treating anxiety, depression, and suicidality in YAWE on the current study, investigating the efficacy of psychological interventions (for example, [acceptance and commitment therapy], [compassion-focused therapy], peer support, and family-based [therapy]) designed to address the psychosocial variables shown to independently predict mental health outcomes in YAWE would be worthy future research avenues,” they concluded.

The study received no outside funding, and the researchers disclosed no financial conflicts.

Young adults with epilepsy experience higher rates of anxiety, depression, and suicidality, compared with their counterparts in the general population, a new study shows.

The findings, based on a study of 144 young adults with epilepsy (YAWE), was published recently in Epilepsy & Behavior.

“People with epilepsy (PWE) are at a significantly higher risk of experiencing mental health difficulties, compared with healthy controls and individuals with other [long-term conditions] such as asthma and diabetes,” according to Rachel Batchelor, MSc, and Michelle D. Taylor, PhD, of the University of London (England) in Surrey.

Young adulthood, which encompasses people aged 18-25 years, has been identified as “a peak age of onset for anxiety and depression,” but mental health in young adults with epilepsy in particular has not been well studied, they wrote.

In the study, Ms. Batchelor and Dr. Taylor reviewed results of an online survey of 144 young adults with epilepsy aged 18-25 years. The survey measured current mental health symptoms, including anxiety, depression, and suicidality, as well as sociodemographic and epilepsy-related factors, coping strategies, and social support (Epilepsy Behav. 2021 May;118:107911. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107911).

The average age of the respondents was 21.6 years, 61% were female, and 88% were of White British ethnicity. A total of 88 participants were single, 48 were in a relationship, and 8 were married or engaged. About one-third (38%) worked full-time, and 28.5% were full-time university students, 18.8% worked part-time, and 8.3% were unemployed and not students. The average age of seizure onset was 12.4 years.

Overall, 116 (80.6%) of the survey respondents met the criteria for anxiety, 110 (76.4%) for depression, and 51 (35.4%) for suicidality.

Ratings of all three of these conditions were significantly higher in females, compared with males, the researchers noted. Anxiety, depression, and suicidality also were rated higher for individuals who waited more than 1 year vs. less than 1 year for an epilepsy diagnosis from the time of seizure onset, for those suffering from anti-seizure medication side effects vs. no side effects, and for those with comorbid conditions vs. no comorbid conditions.

Avoidant-focused coping strategies were positively correlated with anxiety, depression, and suicidality, while problem-focused coping and meaning-focused coping were negatively correlated, the researchers said. In addition, those who reported greater levels of support from friends had lower rates of anxiety and depression, and those who reported greater levels of support from family had lower rates of suicidality.

The study findings were limited by several factors, including the relatively homogenous population, and the absence of data on current anxiety and depression medications and additional professional support, the researchers noted.

However, the results extend the research on mental health in people with epilepsy, and the study is the first known to focus on the young adult population with epilepsy, they said.

“The high rates of anxiety, depression, and suicidality underscore the need for better integration of mental health provision into epilepsy care,” the researchers wrote. “While it would be premature to base recommendations for treating anxiety, depression, and suicidality in YAWE on the current study, investigating the efficacy of psychological interventions (for example, [acceptance and commitment therapy], [compassion-focused therapy], peer support, and family-based [therapy]) designed to address the psychosocial variables shown to independently predict mental health outcomes in YAWE would be worthy future research avenues,” they concluded.

The study received no outside funding, and the researchers disclosed no financial conflicts.