Lisa Diller, MD

Photo from Dana-Farber/

Boston Children’s Cancer

and Blood Disorders Center

Young adult survivors of childhood cancer tend to have inferior health-related quality of life (HRQOL) when compared to the general population, according to research published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) ages 18 to 29 reported overall HRQOL similar to that of people from the general population who were in their 40s.

However, CCSs fared better if they did not have chronic health conditions.

“Our findings indicate survivors’ accelerated aging and also help us understand the health-related risks associated with having had cancer as a child,” said study author Lisa Diller, MD, of Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center and Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts.

“What’s encouraging is that the lower quality of life scores are associated with chronic disease after treatment, not with a history of pediatric cancer itself. If we can prevent treatment-related conditions by changes in the therapy we use for the cancer, then childhood cancer will become an acute, rather than a chronic, illness.”

Dr Diller and her colleagues used information from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study to compare CCSs (n=7105) and their siblings (n=372) and information from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey to make comparisons to the general population (n=12,803).

The researchers estimated health utility, a summary measure of quality of life, in these subjects using the Short Form-6D (SF-6D). A score of “1” indicated perfect health, and a score of “0” indicated death.

Results showed that CCSs had significantly lower SF-6D scores than the general population. The mean scores were 0.77 and 0.81, respectively (P<0.001).

But there were no clinically meaningful differences between the CCSs’ siblings and the general population. Their mean SF-6D scores were 0.80 and 0.81, respectively.

Young adult CCSs ages 18 to 29 had a mean score of 0.78, which was roughly equivalent to that reported for 40-to-49-year-old adults in the general population.

However, the presence or absence of chronic health conditions played a role in HRQOL. CCSs who reported no chronic conditions had SF-6D scores similar to the general population, with a mean score of 0.81.

But CCSs with chronic conditions had scores that matched the scores of chronically ill members of the general population. CCSs with 2 chronic conditions had a mean score of 0.77. Those with 3 or more disabling, severe, or life-threatening conditions had a mean score of 0.70.

“By enabling comparisons to the general population, our findings provide context to better understand how the cancer experience may influence the long-term well-being of survivors,” said study author Jennifer Yeh, PhD, of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston.

“This is another way to understand the health challenges survivors face and where to focus efforts to improve the long-term health and quality of life of survivors.”

Lisa Diller, MD

Photo from Dana-Farber/

Boston Children’s Cancer

and Blood Disorders Center

Young adult survivors of childhood cancer tend to have inferior health-related quality of life (HRQOL) when compared to the general population, according to research published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) ages 18 to 29 reported overall HRQOL similar to that of people from the general population who were in their 40s.

However, CCSs fared better if they did not have chronic health conditions.

“Our findings indicate survivors’ accelerated aging and also help us understand the health-related risks associated with having had cancer as a child,” said study author Lisa Diller, MD, of Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center and Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts.

“What’s encouraging is that the lower quality of life scores are associated with chronic disease after treatment, not with a history of pediatric cancer itself. If we can prevent treatment-related conditions by changes in the therapy we use for the cancer, then childhood cancer will become an acute, rather than a chronic, illness.”

Dr Diller and her colleagues used information from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study to compare CCSs (n=7105) and their siblings (n=372) and information from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey to make comparisons to the general population (n=12,803).

The researchers estimated health utility, a summary measure of quality of life, in these subjects using the Short Form-6D (SF-6D). A score of “1” indicated perfect health, and a score of “0” indicated death.

Results showed that CCSs had significantly lower SF-6D scores than the general population. The mean scores were 0.77 and 0.81, respectively (P<0.001).

But there were no clinically meaningful differences between the CCSs’ siblings and the general population. Their mean SF-6D scores were 0.80 and 0.81, respectively.

Young adult CCSs ages 18 to 29 had a mean score of 0.78, which was roughly equivalent to that reported for 40-to-49-year-old adults in the general population.

However, the presence or absence of chronic health conditions played a role in HRQOL. CCSs who reported no chronic conditions had SF-6D scores similar to the general population, with a mean score of 0.81.

But CCSs with chronic conditions had scores that matched the scores of chronically ill members of the general population. CCSs with 2 chronic conditions had a mean score of 0.77. Those with 3 or more disabling, severe, or life-threatening conditions had a mean score of 0.70.

“By enabling comparisons to the general population, our findings provide context to better understand how the cancer experience may influence the long-term well-being of survivors,” said study author Jennifer Yeh, PhD, of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston.

“This is another way to understand the health challenges survivors face and where to focus efforts to improve the long-term health and quality of life of survivors.”

Lisa Diller, MD

Photo from Dana-Farber/

Boston Children’s Cancer

and Blood Disorders Center

Young adult survivors of childhood cancer tend to have inferior health-related quality of life (HRQOL) when compared to the general population, according to research published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) ages 18 to 29 reported overall HRQOL similar to that of people from the general population who were in their 40s.

However, CCSs fared better if they did not have chronic health conditions.

“Our findings indicate survivors’ accelerated aging and also help us understand the health-related risks associated with having had cancer as a child,” said study author Lisa Diller, MD, of Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center and Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts.

“What’s encouraging is that the lower quality of life scores are associated with chronic disease after treatment, not with a history of pediatric cancer itself. If we can prevent treatment-related conditions by changes in the therapy we use for the cancer, then childhood cancer will become an acute, rather than a chronic, illness.”

Dr Diller and her colleagues used information from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study to compare CCSs (n=7105) and their siblings (n=372) and information from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey to make comparisons to the general population (n=12,803).

The researchers estimated health utility, a summary measure of quality of life, in these subjects using the Short Form-6D (SF-6D). A score of “1” indicated perfect health, and a score of “0” indicated death.

Results showed that CCSs had significantly lower SF-6D scores than the general population. The mean scores were 0.77 and 0.81, respectively (P<0.001).

But there were no clinically meaningful differences between the CCSs’ siblings and the general population. Their mean SF-6D scores were 0.80 and 0.81, respectively.

Young adult CCSs ages 18 to 29 had a mean score of 0.78, which was roughly equivalent to that reported for 40-to-49-year-old adults in the general population.

However, the presence or absence of chronic health conditions played a role in HRQOL. CCSs who reported no chronic conditions had SF-6D scores similar to the general population, with a mean score of 0.81.

But CCSs with chronic conditions had scores that matched the scores of chronically ill members of the general population. CCSs with 2 chronic conditions had a mean score of 0.77. Those with 3 or more disabling, severe, or life-threatening conditions had a mean score of 0.70.

“By enabling comparisons to the general population, our findings provide context to better understand how the cancer experience may influence the long-term well-being of survivors,” said study author Jennifer Yeh, PhD, of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston.

“This is another way to understand the health challenges survivors face and where to focus efforts to improve the long-term health and quality of life of survivors.”

A method for reducing pathogens present in whole blood used for transfusions may reduce the incidence of malaria transmission, and also provide clinical support for patients with severe anemia or hemorrhage, according to the results of a prospective study published April 22 in the Lancet.

“This study is the first to show pathogen reduction treatment of whole blood for transfusion resulted in reduced transmission of a blood-borne infectious parasite in a region hyperendemic for malaria,” wrote Dr. Jean-Pierre Allain of the department of hematology at the University of Cambridge (England) and his coauthors.

Courtesy NIAID

The investigators examined the safety and efficacy of the Mirasol pathogen reduction technology system in the African Investigation of the Mirasol System (AIMS) trial. Between March 12, 2014, and November 7, 2014, 227 adults from Ghana with blood group O+ were admitted to the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, and enrolled in this prospective, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled study of transfusion-transmission of malaria. The patients underwent up to two whole blood transfusions with either pathogen-reduced whole blood (treated), or whole blood prepared and transfused by standard local practice (untreated), within 3 days following randomization. (Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387:1753-61).

Of the patients completing the study protocol and included in the subsequent primary endpoint analysis, 65 nonparasitemic patients were exposed to parasitemic whole blood (28 treated and 37 untreated) and compared with 99 nonparasitemic control patients who received nonparasitemic whole blood (55 treated and 44 untreated), reported Dr. Allain.

The investigators found that the incidence of transfusion-transmitted malaria was significantly lower for the nonparasitemic patients receiving parasitemic whole blood, than for the nonparasitemic control patients who received nonparasitemic whole blood. Of the 65 patients transfused with parasitemic whole blood, 1 of the 28 treated patients (4%) and 8 of the 37 untreated patients (22%) were found to have contracted transfusion-transmitted malaria. Additionally, the safety profiles of the patients receiving treated or untreated whole blood did not differ and no transfusion-related fatalities occurred.

In developing countries, blood supplies are often contaminated by infectious agents, and blood banking systems cannot afford the newest nucleic acid detection technologies for blood-borne pathogens, the investigators wrote. They suggested that technologies designed to reduce pathogens present in whole blood may be of clinical benefit to both individual patients and health care systems. The use of such methods could result not only in better patient outcomes, but also in greater stability in blood supplies, as well as an associated decrease in treatment costs attributable to reductions in preventable infections.

Funding for this project was provided by Terumo BCT, which produces the Mirasol system. All but one of the coauthors disclosed financial ties to the funding source.

A method for reducing pathogens present in whole blood used for transfusions may reduce the incidence of malaria transmission, and also provide clinical support for patients with severe anemia or hemorrhage, according to the results of a prospective study published April 22 in the Lancet.

“This study is the first to show pathogen reduction treatment of whole blood for transfusion resulted in reduced transmission of a blood-borne infectious parasite in a region hyperendemic for malaria,” wrote Dr. Jean-Pierre Allain of the department of hematology at the University of Cambridge (England) and his coauthors.

Courtesy NIAID

The investigators examined the safety and efficacy of the Mirasol pathogen reduction technology system in the African Investigation of the Mirasol System (AIMS) trial. Between March 12, 2014, and November 7, 2014, 227 adults from Ghana with blood group O+ were admitted to the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, and enrolled in this prospective, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled study of transfusion-transmission of malaria. The patients underwent up to two whole blood transfusions with either pathogen-reduced whole blood (treated), or whole blood prepared and transfused by standard local practice (untreated), within 3 days following randomization. (Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387:1753-61).

Of the patients completing the study protocol and included in the subsequent primary endpoint analysis, 65 nonparasitemic patients were exposed to parasitemic whole blood (28 treated and 37 untreated) and compared with 99 nonparasitemic control patients who received nonparasitemic whole blood (55 treated and 44 untreated), reported Dr. Allain.

The investigators found that the incidence of transfusion-transmitted malaria was significantly lower for the nonparasitemic patients receiving parasitemic whole blood, than for the nonparasitemic control patients who received nonparasitemic whole blood. Of the 65 patients transfused with parasitemic whole blood, 1 of the 28 treated patients (4%) and 8 of the 37 untreated patients (22%) were found to have contracted transfusion-transmitted malaria. Additionally, the safety profiles of the patients receiving treated or untreated whole blood did not differ and no transfusion-related fatalities occurred.

In developing countries, blood supplies are often contaminated by infectious agents, and blood banking systems cannot afford the newest nucleic acid detection technologies for blood-borne pathogens, the investigators wrote. They suggested that technologies designed to reduce pathogens present in whole blood may be of clinical benefit to both individual patients and health care systems. The use of such methods could result not only in better patient outcomes, but also in greater stability in blood supplies, as well as an associated decrease in treatment costs attributable to reductions in preventable infections.

Funding for this project was provided by Terumo BCT, which produces the Mirasol system. All but one of the coauthors disclosed financial ties to the funding source.

A method for reducing pathogens present in whole blood used for transfusions may reduce the incidence of malaria transmission, and also provide clinical support for patients with severe anemia or hemorrhage, according to the results of a prospective study published April 22 in the Lancet.

“This study is the first to show pathogen reduction treatment of whole blood for transfusion resulted in reduced transmission of a blood-borne infectious parasite in a region hyperendemic for malaria,” wrote Dr. Jean-Pierre Allain of the department of hematology at the University of Cambridge (England) and his coauthors.

Courtesy NIAID

The investigators examined the safety and efficacy of the Mirasol pathogen reduction technology system in the African Investigation of the Mirasol System (AIMS) trial. Between March 12, 2014, and November 7, 2014, 227 adults from Ghana with blood group O+ were admitted to the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, and enrolled in this prospective, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled study of transfusion-transmission of malaria. The patients underwent up to two whole blood transfusions with either pathogen-reduced whole blood (treated), or whole blood prepared and transfused by standard local practice (untreated), within 3 days following randomization. (Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387:1753-61).

Of the patients completing the study protocol and included in the subsequent primary endpoint analysis, 65 nonparasitemic patients were exposed to parasitemic whole blood (28 treated and 37 untreated) and compared with 99 nonparasitemic control patients who received nonparasitemic whole blood (55 treated and 44 untreated), reported Dr. Allain.

The investigators found that the incidence of transfusion-transmitted malaria was significantly lower for the nonparasitemic patients receiving parasitemic whole blood, than for the nonparasitemic control patients who received nonparasitemic whole blood. Of the 65 patients transfused with parasitemic whole blood, 1 of the 28 treated patients (4%) and 8 of the 37 untreated patients (22%) were found to have contracted transfusion-transmitted malaria. Additionally, the safety profiles of the patients receiving treated or untreated whole blood did not differ and no transfusion-related fatalities occurred.

In developing countries, blood supplies are often contaminated by infectious agents, and blood banking systems cannot afford the newest nucleic acid detection technologies for blood-borne pathogens, the investigators wrote. They suggested that technologies designed to reduce pathogens present in whole blood may be of clinical benefit to both individual patients and health care systems. The use of such methods could result not only in better patient outcomes, but also in greater stability in blood supplies, as well as an associated decrease in treatment costs attributable to reductions in preventable infections.

Funding for this project was provided by Terumo BCT, which produces the Mirasol system. All but one of the coauthors disclosed financial ties to the funding source.

VANCOUVER – Once-daily eslicarbazepine may offer a more convenient option for controlling newly diagnosed partial-onset seizures, suggest findings of a phase III trial reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

The study of 815 adult patients found that 71.1% of those treated with once-daily eslicarbazepine as monotherapy were seizure free for at least 6 months, compared with 75.6% of those treated with twice-daily controlled-release carbamazepine as monotherapy. The difference fell within the predefined margin for noninferiority.

Additionally, the safety profile of eslicarbazepine was at least as good as that of carbamazepine, and there were no new or unexpected adverse events, relative to those seen in trials in which the former has been used as adjunctive therapy.

“Eslicarbazepine has the same efficacy, has a little bit better safety, and it can be taken once a day,” coauthor Dr. Pedro André Kowacs commented in an interview. “I have been working with it for 12 years. It’s a very, very good drug.”

“There are few antiepileptic drugs that can be taken once a day,” he added. “We know that a more simple schedule enhances adherence of the patient, compliance of the patient to therapy.”

Also, patients can choose when to take eslicarbazepine, according to Dr. Kowacs, who is a neurologist at the Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba in Brazil. “You can take it in the morning or you can take it at night. It doesn’t matter,” he elaborated. “This is in contrast to, say, phenobarbital. If you take it in the morning, perhaps you are going to sleep all day long. And if you take three tabs of Dilantin (phenytoin), probably you get a little bit dizzy.”

In the trial, patients were randomized evenly to once-daily eslicarbazepine (brand name Aptiom) or twice-daily controlled-release carbamazepine (brand name Tegretol XR), each as monotherapy. Eslicarbazepine is currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of partial-onset seizures as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy.

In both groups, the patients were treated according to a three-step dose-level design, with upward titration of dose if they experienced seizures. However, the majority in each group – 67.6% for eslicarbazepine and 76.9% for carbamazepine – remained at the lowest-dose level studied (800 mg once daily and 200 mg twice daily, respectively).

The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in the per-protocol population who were seizure free for the entire 26-week evaluation period at the last received dose level.

Overall, that proportion was 71.1% in the eslicarbazepine group and 75.6% in the carbamazepine group, Dr. Kowacs reported in an Emerging Science session. The absolute difference of –4.28% and the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of –10.30% fell within the predefined noninferiority margin of –12%.

The 1-year rate of freedom from seizures was 64.7% in the eslicarbazepine group and 70.3% in the carbamazepine group. The absolute difference of –5.46% and the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of –11.88% again fell within the noninferiority margin.

Patients in the eslicarbazepine tended to have a lower rate of treatment-emergent adverse events possibly related to the drug, compared with counterparts in the carbamazepine group (41.1% vs. 49.5%). The most common were dizziness and headache.

“The [gamma glutamyl transferase level] was increased in more patients taking carbamazepine,” Dr. Kowacs noted, with a rate of 12.4% versus 2.7% with eslicarbazepine. “Hyponatremia occurred in both groups, but no patient was symptomatic.”

There were two deaths each in the eslicarbazepine group (from glioblastoma and cardiac arrest) and the carbamazepine group (from suicide and lung cancer).

Dr. Kowacs disclosed that he has received personal compensation for activities with Bial, Abbott Laboratories, GlaxoSmithKline, and Cyberonics. The trial was sponsored by Bial-Portela & Cª SA.

VANCOUVER – Once-daily eslicarbazepine may offer a more convenient option for controlling newly diagnosed partial-onset seizures, suggest findings of a phase III trial reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

The study of 815 adult patients found that 71.1% of those treated with once-daily eslicarbazepine as monotherapy were seizure free for at least 6 months, compared with 75.6% of those treated with twice-daily controlled-release carbamazepine as monotherapy. The difference fell within the predefined margin for noninferiority.

Additionally, the safety profile of eslicarbazepine was at least as good as that of carbamazepine, and there were no new or unexpected adverse events, relative to those seen in trials in which the former has been used as adjunctive therapy.

“Eslicarbazepine has the same efficacy, has a little bit better safety, and it can be taken once a day,” coauthor Dr. Pedro André Kowacs commented in an interview. “I have been working with it for 12 years. It’s a very, very good drug.”

“There are few antiepileptic drugs that can be taken once a day,” he added. “We know that a more simple schedule enhances adherence of the patient, compliance of the patient to therapy.”

Also, patients can choose when to take eslicarbazepine, according to Dr. Kowacs, who is a neurologist at the Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba in Brazil. “You can take it in the morning or you can take it at night. It doesn’t matter,” he elaborated. “This is in contrast to, say, phenobarbital. If you take it in the morning, perhaps you are going to sleep all day long. And if you take three tabs of Dilantin (phenytoin), probably you get a little bit dizzy.”

In the trial, patients were randomized evenly to once-daily eslicarbazepine (brand name Aptiom) or twice-daily controlled-release carbamazepine (brand name Tegretol XR), each as monotherapy. Eslicarbazepine is currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of partial-onset seizures as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy.

In both groups, the patients were treated according to a three-step dose-level design, with upward titration of dose if they experienced seizures. However, the majority in each group – 67.6% for eslicarbazepine and 76.9% for carbamazepine – remained at the lowest-dose level studied (800 mg once daily and 200 mg twice daily, respectively).

The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in the per-protocol population who were seizure free for the entire 26-week evaluation period at the last received dose level.

Overall, that proportion was 71.1% in the eslicarbazepine group and 75.6% in the carbamazepine group, Dr. Kowacs reported in an Emerging Science session. The absolute difference of –4.28% and the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of –10.30% fell within the predefined noninferiority margin of –12%.

The 1-year rate of freedom from seizures was 64.7% in the eslicarbazepine group and 70.3% in the carbamazepine group. The absolute difference of –5.46% and the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of –11.88% again fell within the noninferiority margin.

Patients in the eslicarbazepine tended to have a lower rate of treatment-emergent adverse events possibly related to the drug, compared with counterparts in the carbamazepine group (41.1% vs. 49.5%). The most common were dizziness and headache.

“The [gamma glutamyl transferase level] was increased in more patients taking carbamazepine,” Dr. Kowacs noted, with a rate of 12.4% versus 2.7% with eslicarbazepine. “Hyponatremia occurred in both groups, but no patient was symptomatic.”

There were two deaths each in the eslicarbazepine group (from glioblastoma and cardiac arrest) and the carbamazepine group (from suicide and lung cancer).

Dr. Kowacs disclosed that he has received personal compensation for activities with Bial, Abbott Laboratories, GlaxoSmithKline, and Cyberonics. The trial was sponsored by Bial-Portela & Cª SA.

VANCOUVER – Once-daily eslicarbazepine may offer a more convenient option for controlling newly diagnosed partial-onset seizures, suggest findings of a phase III trial reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

The study of 815 adult patients found that 71.1% of those treated with once-daily eslicarbazepine as monotherapy were seizure free for at least 6 months, compared with 75.6% of those treated with twice-daily controlled-release carbamazepine as monotherapy. The difference fell within the predefined margin for noninferiority.

Additionally, the safety profile of eslicarbazepine was at least as good as that of carbamazepine, and there were no new or unexpected adverse events, relative to those seen in trials in which the former has been used as adjunctive therapy.

“Eslicarbazepine has the same efficacy, has a little bit better safety, and it can be taken once a day,” coauthor Dr. Pedro André Kowacs commented in an interview. “I have been working with it for 12 years. It’s a very, very good drug.”

“There are few antiepileptic drugs that can be taken once a day,” he added. “We know that a more simple schedule enhances adherence of the patient, compliance of the patient to therapy.”

Also, patients can choose when to take eslicarbazepine, according to Dr. Kowacs, who is a neurologist at the Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba in Brazil. “You can take it in the morning or you can take it at night. It doesn’t matter,” he elaborated. “This is in contrast to, say, phenobarbital. If you take it in the morning, perhaps you are going to sleep all day long. And if you take three tabs of Dilantin (phenytoin), probably you get a little bit dizzy.”

In the trial, patients were randomized evenly to once-daily eslicarbazepine (brand name Aptiom) or twice-daily controlled-release carbamazepine (brand name Tegretol XR), each as monotherapy. Eslicarbazepine is currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of partial-onset seizures as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy.

In both groups, the patients were treated according to a three-step dose-level design, with upward titration of dose if they experienced seizures. However, the majority in each group – 67.6% for eslicarbazepine and 76.9% for carbamazepine – remained at the lowest-dose level studied (800 mg once daily and 200 mg twice daily, respectively).

The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in the per-protocol population who were seizure free for the entire 26-week evaluation period at the last received dose level.

Overall, that proportion was 71.1% in the eslicarbazepine group and 75.6% in the carbamazepine group, Dr. Kowacs reported in an Emerging Science session. The absolute difference of –4.28% and the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of –10.30% fell within the predefined noninferiority margin of –12%.

The 1-year rate of freedom from seizures was 64.7% in the eslicarbazepine group and 70.3% in the carbamazepine group. The absolute difference of –5.46% and the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of –11.88% again fell within the noninferiority margin.

Patients in the eslicarbazepine tended to have a lower rate of treatment-emergent adverse events possibly related to the drug, compared with counterparts in the carbamazepine group (41.1% vs. 49.5%). The most common were dizziness and headache.

“The [gamma glutamyl transferase level] was increased in more patients taking carbamazepine,” Dr. Kowacs noted, with a rate of 12.4% versus 2.7% with eslicarbazepine. “Hyponatremia occurred in both groups, but no patient was symptomatic.”

There were two deaths each in the eslicarbazepine group (from glioblastoma and cardiac arrest) and the carbamazepine group (from suicide and lung cancer).

Dr. Kowacs disclosed that he has received personal compensation for activities with Bial, Abbott Laboratories, GlaxoSmithKline, and Cyberonics. The trial was sponsored by Bial-Portela & Cª SA.

A 67-year-old Asian woman presents with changes under her breasts that manifested several years ago and are slowly becoming more pronounced. Occasionally itchy, the skin is always hot and sweaty. This problem has been treated numerous times over the years with oral and topical antiyeast preparations, to no good effect. She is currently on fluconazole oral.

Aside from obesity, she claims that her only other health problem is “skin rashes” on her arms and scalp, which have persisted for years. Cursory examination of her chart, however, reveals that she also has type 2 diabetes and dementia.

EXAMINATION
The patient is 5 feet tall and weighs 240 lb. She has type II skin with classic Asian coloring. The skin under her breasts is bright pink, with focal areas of dark brown. The affected area extends downward onto her upper abdomen. The surface of the rash is totally macular, with no palpable component.

On both extensor forearms, a scaly, pink rash is seen, covered with thick, white scales. Likewise, on her scalp, particularly above and behind the ears, there are large patches of white scaling with underlying pink skin.

What is the diagnosis?

DISCUSSION
While it is uncommon in those of Asian ancestry, this patient has psoriasis. (The involvement of her scalp and arms helps to corroborate this diagnosis.) But she has other issues that serve to confuse the picture: Her extreme obesity and pendulous breasts trap heat and sweat, which induces a condition called intertrigo. This chronic inflammatory process has become “koebnerized,” a phenomenon in which psoriasis appears in a traumatized area, such as a surgical wound or burn. To make matters even worse, the skin immediately under her breasts has darkened as a result of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation.

So this patient actually has three overlapping problems: intertrigo, koebnerized psoriasis, and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. Her obesity, which is unlikely to improve, is a major contributor to each. Luckily, the inframammary skin changes are relatively asymptomatic.

All three problems can be alleviated by reducing heat and sweat (with antiperspirants, talcum-based powder, weight loss, and use of cotton cloth to separate the breasts from the underlying chest skin), and through use of topical class III steroid creams. We can stop treating it as a yeast infection, because yeast plays little to no part in the process.

TAKE-HOME LEARNING POINTS
• Skin injury—whether from surgery, burn, excoriation, or chronic maceration—can cause psoriasis to flare, a process known as the Koebner phenomenon.

• Intertrigo refers to an inflammatory condition affecting intertriginous areas such as the groin, axilla, abdominal or other folds, and inframammary skin.

• Intertrigo is caused by chronic maceration related to heat and perspiration and is especially common under the breasts.

• The same chronic inflammation that causes intertrigo and the Koebner phenomenon can also result in postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in those with darker skin.

• Bacteria and yeast organisms play only a small role, if any, in these processes.

A 67-year-old Asian woman presents with changes under her breasts that manifested several years ago and are slowly becoming more pronounced. Occasionally itchy, the skin is always hot and sweaty. This problem has been treated numerous times over the years with oral and topical antiyeast preparations, to no good effect. She is currently on fluconazole oral.

Aside from obesity, she claims that her only other health problem is “skin rashes” on her arms and scalp, which have persisted for years. Cursory examination of her chart, however, reveals that she also has type 2 diabetes and dementia.

EXAMINATION
The patient is 5 feet tall and weighs 240 lb. She has type II skin with classic Asian coloring. The skin under her breasts is bright pink, with focal areas of dark brown. The affected area extends downward onto her upper abdomen. The surface of the rash is totally macular, with no palpable component.

On both extensor forearms, a scaly, pink rash is seen, covered with thick, white scales. Likewise, on her scalp, particularly above and behind the ears, there are large patches of white scaling with underlying pink skin.

What is the diagnosis?

DISCUSSION
While it is uncommon in those of Asian ancestry, this patient has psoriasis. (The involvement of her scalp and arms helps to corroborate this diagnosis.) But she has other issues that serve to confuse the picture: Her extreme obesity and pendulous breasts trap heat and sweat, which induces a condition called intertrigo. This chronic inflammatory process has become “koebnerized,” a phenomenon in which psoriasis appears in a traumatized area, such as a surgical wound or burn. To make matters even worse, the skin immediately under her breasts has darkened as a result of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation.

So this patient actually has three overlapping problems: intertrigo, koebnerized psoriasis, and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. Her obesity, which is unlikely to improve, is a major contributor to each. Luckily, the inframammary skin changes are relatively asymptomatic.

All three problems can be alleviated by reducing heat and sweat (with antiperspirants, talcum-based powder, weight loss, and use of cotton cloth to separate the breasts from the underlying chest skin), and through use of topical class III steroid creams. We can stop treating it as a yeast infection, because yeast plays little to no part in the process.

TAKE-HOME LEARNING POINTS
• Skin injury—whether from surgery, burn, excoriation, or chronic maceration—can cause psoriasis to flare, a process known as the Koebner phenomenon.

• Intertrigo refers to an inflammatory condition affecting intertriginous areas such as the groin, axilla, abdominal or other folds, and inframammary skin.

• Intertrigo is caused by chronic maceration related to heat and perspiration and is especially common under the breasts.

• The same chronic inflammation that causes intertrigo and the Koebner phenomenon can also result in postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in those with darker skin.

• Bacteria and yeast organisms play only a small role, if any, in these processes.

A 67-year-old Asian woman presents with changes under her breasts that manifested several years ago and are slowly becoming more pronounced. Occasionally itchy, the skin is always hot and sweaty. This problem has been treated numerous times over the years with oral and topical antiyeast preparations, to no good effect. She is currently on fluconazole oral.

Aside from obesity, she claims that her only other health problem is “skin rashes” on her arms and scalp, which have persisted for years. Cursory examination of her chart, however, reveals that she also has type 2 diabetes and dementia.

EXAMINATION
The patient is 5 feet tall and weighs 240 lb. She has type II skin with classic Asian coloring. The skin under her breasts is bright pink, with focal areas of dark brown. The affected area extends downward onto her upper abdomen. The surface of the rash is totally macular, with no palpable component.

On both extensor forearms, a scaly, pink rash is seen, covered with thick, white scales. Likewise, on her scalp, particularly above and behind the ears, there are large patches of white scaling with underlying pink skin.

What is the diagnosis?

DISCUSSION
While it is uncommon in those of Asian ancestry, this patient has psoriasis. (The involvement of her scalp and arms helps to corroborate this diagnosis.) But she has other issues that serve to confuse the picture: Her extreme obesity and pendulous breasts trap heat and sweat, which induces a condition called intertrigo. This chronic inflammatory process has become “koebnerized,” a phenomenon in which psoriasis appears in a traumatized area, such as a surgical wound or burn. To make matters even worse, the skin immediately under her breasts has darkened as a result of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation.

So this patient actually has three overlapping problems: intertrigo, koebnerized psoriasis, and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. Her obesity, which is unlikely to improve, is a major contributor to each. Luckily, the inframammary skin changes are relatively asymptomatic.

All three problems can be alleviated by reducing heat and sweat (with antiperspirants, talcum-based powder, weight loss, and use of cotton cloth to separate the breasts from the underlying chest skin), and through use of topical class III steroid creams. We can stop treating it as a yeast infection, because yeast plays little to no part in the process.

TAKE-HOME LEARNING POINTS
• Skin injury—whether from surgery, burn, excoriation, or chronic maceration—can cause psoriasis to flare, a process known as the Koebner phenomenon.

• Intertrigo refers to an inflammatory condition affecting intertriginous areas such as the groin, axilla, abdominal or other folds, and inframammary skin.

• Intertrigo is caused by chronic maceration related to heat and perspiration and is especially common under the breasts.

• The same chronic inflammation that causes intertrigo and the Koebner phenomenon can also result in postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in those with darker skin.

• Bacteria and yeast organisms play only a small role, if any, in these processes.

AMSTERDAM – The long-term safety of proton pump inhibitors has once again come into question, as they may quadruple the chance of carrying a bacterial strain highly resistant to both penicillin and cephalosporin antibiotics, a Dutch study suggested.

The observational study showed only association, not causation, according to Dr. Pepijn Huizinga of the Amphia Ziekenhuis Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands. But, he said, the association of PPIs and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase–producing enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) is biologically plausible, and strong enough to warrant deeper investigation. Dr. Huizinga reported the study results at the 2016 European Conference of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

“We are continuously exposed to ESBL-E from many sources – other humans, contaminated foods, and the environment,” Dr. Huizinga said. “The gastric acid barrier is one of the last barriers we have against developing carriage. As long as it is in the normal pH range of 1.5-3, it’s quite efficient at keeping these bacteria from entering our system. But PPIs decrease this to 3 or 4. We already know that this is associated with an increased risk of infections from campylobacteriae, salmonella, and C. [Clostridium] difficile.”

PPI use is exploding in the Netherlands, Dr. Huizinga said, following a worldwide pattern of escalating use. National statistics demonstrate a very sharp upward trend, beginning with the introduction of omeprazole in 1994. By 2013, with five PPIs on the market, there were more than 2.7 million users – 14% of the country’s adult population. About a third of people older than 65 years are using them on a daily basis, according to data from the Dutch Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics.

To examine the relationship, Dr. Huizinga mined data from an ESBL-E prevalence survey conducted at Amphia Ziekenhuis Hospital in 2014 and 2015. The study cohort comprised 570 adults who received a rectal culture within a day of admission. Of these, 5.4% (31) were positive for ESBL-E carriage.

He examined correlations between carriage and several patient characteristics. Women were slightly more likely to be carriers than men (6.6% vs. 4%). There was no difference in the incidence of antibiotic use on day of admission, with 6% of the positive patients taking an antibiotic and 5% not taking one. Carriers were younger than noncarriers (64 vs. 65 years). PPI use was significantly more common among those who carried ESBL-E (8.6% vs. 2.9%).

In a multivariate analysis, there were no significant associations with sex, age, or antibiotic use. PPI use conferred the only significant risk, a fourfold increase in the chance of carriage.

Dr. Huizinga noted that the model didn’t consider the length of time taking the drugs, only whether they were in use on the day of admission. Nor did the study account for any medical comorbidity.

“However,” he said, “I think we do need to consider the possibility that the frequent use of PPIs in the general population could be an important driver of the increase we are seeing in ESBL-E carriage.”

Dr. Huizinga had no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @Alz_Gal

AMSTERDAM – The long-term safety of proton pump inhibitors has once again come into question, as they may quadruple the chance of carrying a bacterial strain highly resistant to both penicillin and cephalosporin antibiotics, a Dutch study suggested.

The observational study showed only association, not causation, according to Dr. Pepijn Huizinga of the Amphia Ziekenhuis Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands. But, he said, the association of PPIs and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase–producing enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) is biologically plausible, and strong enough to warrant deeper investigation. Dr. Huizinga reported the study results at the 2016 European Conference of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

“We are continuously exposed to ESBL-E from many sources – other humans, contaminated foods, and the environment,” Dr. Huizinga said. “The gastric acid barrier is one of the last barriers we have against developing carriage. As long as it is in the normal pH range of 1.5-3, it’s quite efficient at keeping these bacteria from entering our system. But PPIs decrease this to 3 or 4. We already know that this is associated with an increased risk of infections from campylobacteriae, salmonella, and C. [Clostridium] difficile.”

PPI use is exploding in the Netherlands, Dr. Huizinga said, following a worldwide pattern of escalating use. National statistics demonstrate a very sharp upward trend, beginning with the introduction of omeprazole in 1994. By 2013, with five PPIs on the market, there were more than 2.7 million users – 14% of the country’s adult population. About a third of people older than 65 years are using them on a daily basis, according to data from the Dutch Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics.

To examine the relationship, Dr. Huizinga mined data from an ESBL-E prevalence survey conducted at Amphia Ziekenhuis Hospital in 2014 and 2015. The study cohort comprised 570 adults who received a rectal culture within a day of admission. Of these, 5.4% (31) were positive for ESBL-E carriage.

He examined correlations between carriage and several patient characteristics. Women were slightly more likely to be carriers than men (6.6% vs. 4%). There was no difference in the incidence of antibiotic use on day of admission, with 6% of the positive patients taking an antibiotic and 5% not taking one. Carriers were younger than noncarriers (64 vs. 65 years). PPI use was significantly more common among those who carried ESBL-E (8.6% vs. 2.9%).

In a multivariate analysis, there were no significant associations with sex, age, or antibiotic use. PPI use conferred the only significant risk, a fourfold increase in the chance of carriage.

Dr. Huizinga noted that the model didn’t consider the length of time taking the drugs, only whether they were in use on the day of admission. Nor did the study account for any medical comorbidity.

“However,” he said, “I think we do need to consider the possibility that the frequent use of PPIs in the general population could be an important driver of the increase we are seeing in ESBL-E carriage.”

Dr. Huizinga had no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @Alz_Gal

AMSTERDAM – The long-term safety of proton pump inhibitors has once again come into question, as they may quadruple the chance of carrying a bacterial strain highly resistant to both penicillin and cephalosporin antibiotics, a Dutch study suggested.

The observational study showed only association, not causation, according to Dr. Pepijn Huizinga of the Amphia Ziekenhuis Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands. But, he said, the association of PPIs and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase–producing enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) is biologically plausible, and strong enough to warrant deeper investigation. Dr. Huizinga reported the study results at the 2016 European Conference of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

“We are continuously exposed to ESBL-E from many sources – other humans, contaminated foods, and the environment,” Dr. Huizinga said. “The gastric acid barrier is one of the last barriers we have against developing carriage. As long as it is in the normal pH range of 1.5-3, it’s quite efficient at keeping these bacteria from entering our system. But PPIs decrease this to 3 or 4. We already know that this is associated with an increased risk of infections from campylobacteriae, salmonella, and C. [Clostridium] difficile.”

PPI use is exploding in the Netherlands, Dr. Huizinga said, following a worldwide pattern of escalating use. National statistics demonstrate a very sharp upward trend, beginning with the introduction of omeprazole in 1994. By 2013, with five PPIs on the market, there were more than 2.7 million users – 14% of the country’s adult population. About a third of people older than 65 years are using them on a daily basis, according to data from the Dutch Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics.

To examine the relationship, Dr. Huizinga mined data from an ESBL-E prevalence survey conducted at Amphia Ziekenhuis Hospital in 2014 and 2015. The study cohort comprised 570 adults who received a rectal culture within a day of admission. Of these, 5.4% (31) were positive for ESBL-E carriage.

He examined correlations between carriage and several patient characteristics. Women were slightly more likely to be carriers than men (6.6% vs. 4%). There was no difference in the incidence of antibiotic use on day of admission, with 6% of the positive patients taking an antibiotic and 5% not taking one. Carriers were younger than noncarriers (64 vs. 65 years). PPI use was significantly more common among those who carried ESBL-E (8.6% vs. 2.9%).

In a multivariate analysis, there were no significant associations with sex, age, or antibiotic use. PPI use conferred the only significant risk, a fourfold increase in the chance of carriage.

Dr. Huizinga noted that the model didn’t consider the length of time taking the drugs, only whether they were in use on the day of admission. Nor did the study account for any medical comorbidity.

“However,” he said, “I think we do need to consider the possibility that the frequent use of PPIs in the general population could be an important driver of the increase we are seeing in ESBL-E carriage.”

Dr. Huizinga had no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @Alz_Gal

Wait, I know what you’re thinking, boring, dry, and don’t scold me. I am not going to do any of that today, and instead am going to tell you how to easily improve patient care, save money, and improve staff morale.

The easiest things to do to improve safety in the office include better communications, infection control, correct patient/site identification, dealing with emergencies, and staff safety.

Staff communication is often surprisingly poor, and physicians often assume staff can read our minds (and if they have worked for you for many years, maybe they can!). Always make sure staff – and patients – repeat back complicated instructions (better to start by making them less complicated). Never assume your patients are literate, 14% of adults cannot read, so make sure your staff goes over printed materials with the patients.

Something easy you can do is eliminate abbreviations from your prescription pad and your medical record.

Failure to follow up on path reports and lost biopsies is a frequent cause for lawsuits. You need to make sure you have a redundant system for tracking and reporting pathology results. In addition to the old reliable pathology log book, you need a sequential system ensuring that the specimen made it to the lab, that the result was generated and received, that the patient was notified, and that further action was taken if needed. If this is integrated into your electronic medical record, so much the better, but you still need a paper backup log book, “just in case.”

We all take basic infection precautions when performing procedures, including alcohol hand gel, eye protection, gloves, mask, and cleaning of surgical sites prior to excision. When there are wound infections, which should be rare, you should always culture, and if there is a cluster of infections, particularly with methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), you should consider culturing the anterior nares of the staff. Alternatively, you can preemptively treat the staff with intranasal topical mupirocin daily for 2 weeks.

Measuring the use of alcohol gel before and after staff education is an easy and beneficial quality improvement project. You and your staff are, of course, vaccinated for hepatitis B, and yearly for influenza, and you should consider PPD testing every 2 years for everyone. My asymptomatic receptionist converted, and needed prophylactic tuberculosis treatment and contact tracing.

Wrong-site surgery is a frequent problem for dermatologists. Many of our biopsies are tangential, heal almost invisibly, without marking sutures, and patients have battle-scarred skin, and are elderly. The patients may have trouble remembering or seeing where the biopsy was, so good charts and family members are helpful. Photographs of the biopsy sites can be priceless. If the site still cannot be identified, then rebiopsy, or close follow-up is indicated.

Emergencies are rare, but it is prudent to have an automatic external defibrillator in the office. These are automated, so Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS), or even basic CPR is not required to operate them, and the survival rate after cardiac arrest increases from 2% to 50%. When it has to be replaced after 5 years, take the old one home and teach your spouse how to use it, and maybe they will.

If you do a lot of surgery you may want to get the ACLS training and buy the crash cart drug kit, but many of the drugs have become ferociously expensive, despite being generic.

Staff safety is a crucial consideration and showing concern boosts staff morale. You should dispose of sharps directly into a sharps container and remove the sharps from the tray at the end of the case. You should have a written protocol for needle sticks. I keep the red top tubes, and the first 2 days of HIV medication on site. Sometimes a patient is HIV positive, the sharp exposure is unknown (a cryostat tissue tease for example), or the patient refuses to have their blood drawn. Less obvious, but important to staff, are locks on doors, alarm systems, good parking lot lighting, and security cameras.

Office safety may seem mundane but a few simple measures can save you a fortune, boost employee morale, and most important of all, improve patient care.

Dr. Coldiron is a past president of the American Academy of Dermatology. He is currently in private practice, but maintains a clinical assistant professorship at the University of Cincinnati. He cares for patients, teaches medical students and residents, and has several active clinical research projects. Dr. Coldiron is the author of more than 80 scientific letters, papers, and several book chapters, and he speaks frequently on a variety of topics.

Wait, I know what you’re thinking, boring, dry, and don’t scold me. I am not going to do any of that today, and instead am going to tell you how to easily improve patient care, save money, and improve staff morale.

The easiest things to do to improve safety in the office include better communications, infection control, correct patient/site identification, dealing with emergencies, and staff safety.

Staff communication is often surprisingly poor, and physicians often assume staff can read our minds (and if they have worked for you for many years, maybe they can!). Always make sure staff – and patients – repeat back complicated instructions (better to start by making them less complicated). Never assume your patients are literate, 14% of adults cannot read, so make sure your staff goes over printed materials with the patients.

Something easy you can do is eliminate abbreviations from your prescription pad and your medical record.

Failure to follow up on path reports and lost biopsies is a frequent cause for lawsuits. You need to make sure you have a redundant system for tracking and reporting pathology results. In addition to the old reliable pathology log book, you need a sequential system ensuring that the specimen made it to the lab, that the result was generated and received, that the patient was notified, and that further action was taken if needed. If this is integrated into your electronic medical record, so much the better, but you still need a paper backup log book, “just in case.”

We all take basic infection precautions when performing procedures, including alcohol hand gel, eye protection, gloves, mask, and cleaning of surgical sites prior to excision. When there are wound infections, which should be rare, you should always culture, and if there is a cluster of infections, particularly with methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), you should consider culturing the anterior nares of the staff. Alternatively, you can preemptively treat the staff with intranasal topical mupirocin daily for 2 weeks.

Measuring the use of alcohol gel before and after staff education is an easy and beneficial quality improvement project. You and your staff are, of course, vaccinated for hepatitis B, and yearly for influenza, and you should consider PPD testing every 2 years for everyone. My asymptomatic receptionist converted, and needed prophylactic tuberculosis treatment and contact tracing.

Wrong-site surgery is a frequent problem for dermatologists. Many of our biopsies are tangential, heal almost invisibly, without marking sutures, and patients have battle-scarred skin, and are elderly. The patients may have trouble remembering or seeing where the biopsy was, so good charts and family members are helpful. Photographs of the biopsy sites can be priceless. If the site still cannot be identified, then rebiopsy, or close follow-up is indicated.

Emergencies are rare, but it is prudent to have an automatic external defibrillator in the office. These are automated, so Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS), or even basic CPR is not required to operate them, and the survival rate after cardiac arrest increases from 2% to 50%. When it has to be replaced after 5 years, take the old one home and teach your spouse how to use it, and maybe they will.

If you do a lot of surgery you may want to get the ACLS training and buy the crash cart drug kit, but many of the drugs have become ferociously expensive, despite being generic.

Staff safety is a crucial consideration and showing concern boosts staff morale. You should dispose of sharps directly into a sharps container and remove the sharps from the tray at the end of the case. You should have a written protocol for needle sticks. I keep the red top tubes, and the first 2 days of HIV medication on site. Sometimes a patient is HIV positive, the sharp exposure is unknown (a cryostat tissue tease for example), or the patient refuses to have their blood drawn. Less obvious, but important to staff, are locks on doors, alarm systems, good parking lot lighting, and security cameras.

Office safety may seem mundane but a few simple measures can save you a fortune, boost employee morale, and most important of all, improve patient care.

Dr. Coldiron is a past president of the American Academy of Dermatology. He is currently in private practice, but maintains a clinical assistant professorship at the University of Cincinnati. He cares for patients, teaches medical students and residents, and has several active clinical research projects. Dr. Coldiron is the author of more than 80 scientific letters, papers, and several book chapters, and he speaks frequently on a variety of topics.

Wait, I know what you’re thinking, boring, dry, and don’t scold me. I am not going to do any of that today, and instead am going to tell you how to easily improve patient care, save money, and improve staff morale.

The easiest things to do to improve safety in the office include better communications, infection control, correct patient/site identification, dealing with emergencies, and staff safety.

Staff communication is often surprisingly poor, and physicians often assume staff can read our minds (and if they have worked for you for many years, maybe they can!). Always make sure staff – and patients – repeat back complicated instructions (better to start by making them less complicated). Never assume your patients are literate, 14% of adults cannot read, so make sure your staff goes over printed materials with the patients.

Something easy you can do is eliminate abbreviations from your prescription pad and your medical record.

Failure to follow up on path reports and lost biopsies is a frequent cause for lawsuits. You need to make sure you have a redundant system for tracking and reporting pathology results. In addition to the old reliable pathology log book, you need a sequential system ensuring that the specimen made it to the lab, that the result was generated and received, that the patient was notified, and that further action was taken if needed. If this is integrated into your electronic medical record, so much the better, but you still need a paper backup log book, “just in case.”

We all take basic infection precautions when performing procedures, including alcohol hand gel, eye protection, gloves, mask, and cleaning of surgical sites prior to excision. When there are wound infections, which should be rare, you should always culture, and if there is a cluster of infections, particularly with methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), you should consider culturing the anterior nares of the staff. Alternatively, you can preemptively treat the staff with intranasal topical mupirocin daily for 2 weeks.

Measuring the use of alcohol gel before and after staff education is an easy and beneficial quality improvement project. You and your staff are, of course, vaccinated for hepatitis B, and yearly for influenza, and you should consider PPD testing every 2 years for everyone. My asymptomatic receptionist converted, and needed prophylactic tuberculosis treatment and contact tracing.

Wrong-site surgery is a frequent problem for dermatologists. Many of our biopsies are tangential, heal almost invisibly, without marking sutures, and patients have battle-scarred skin, and are elderly. The patients may have trouble remembering or seeing where the biopsy was, so good charts and family members are helpful. Photographs of the biopsy sites can be priceless. If the site still cannot be identified, then rebiopsy, or close follow-up is indicated.

Emergencies are rare, but it is prudent to have an automatic external defibrillator in the office. These are automated, so Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS), or even basic CPR is not required to operate them, and the survival rate after cardiac arrest increases from 2% to 50%. When it has to be replaced after 5 years, take the old one home and teach your spouse how to use it, and maybe they will.

If you do a lot of surgery you may want to get the ACLS training and buy the crash cart drug kit, but many of the drugs have become ferociously expensive, despite being generic.

Staff safety is a crucial consideration and showing concern boosts staff morale. You should dispose of sharps directly into a sharps container and remove the sharps from the tray at the end of the case. You should have a written protocol for needle sticks. I keep the red top tubes, and the first 2 days of HIV medication on site. Sometimes a patient is HIV positive, the sharp exposure is unknown (a cryostat tissue tease for example), or the patient refuses to have their blood drawn. Less obvious, but important to staff, are locks on doors, alarm systems, good parking lot lighting, and security cameras.

Office safety may seem mundane but a few simple measures can save you a fortune, boost employee morale, and most important of all, improve patient care.

Dr. Coldiron is a past president of the American Academy of Dermatology. He is currently in private practice, but maintains a clinical assistant professorship at the University of Cincinnati. He cares for patients, teaches medical students and residents, and has several active clinical research projects. Dr. Coldiron is the author of more than 80 scientific letters, papers, and several book chapters, and he speaks frequently on a variety of topics.

Bowing to pressure from the hospital industry and Congress, the Obama administration on April 20 delayed releasing its new hospital quality rating measure just a day before its planned launch.

The new “overall hospital quality” star rating aimed to combine the government’s disparate efforts to measure hospital care into one easy-to-grasp metric. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services now publishes more than 100 measures of aspects of hospital care, but many of these measures are technical and confusing since hospitals often do well on some and poorly on others. The new star rating boils 62 of the measures down into a unified rating of one to five stars, with five being the best.

©Daniel Mirer/thinkstockphotos.com

But this month, 60 senators and 225 members of the House of Representatives signed letters urging the CMS to delay releasing the star ratings. “We have heard from hospitals in our districts that they do not have the necessary data to replicate or evaluate the CMS’s work to ensure that the methodology is accurate or fair,” the letter from the House members said.

In a notice sent April 20, the CMS told Congress it would delay release of the star ratings on its Hospital Compare website until July 2016. The “CMS is committed to working with hospitals and associations to provide further guidance about star ratings,” the notice said. “After the star ratings go live in their first iteration, we will refine and improve the site as we work together and gain experience.”

But in a conference call with hospital representatives, the CMS officials said they might delay release of the ratings past July if they are still analyzing or revising the methodology, according to people who participated in the call.

Mortality, readmissions, patient experience, and safety of care metrics each accounted for 22% of the star rating, while measures of effectiveness of care, timeliness of care, and efficient use of medical imaging made up 12% in total.

©roobcio/Thinkstock

The hospital industry for months has been urging this delay, arguing that many of the measures will not be relevant to patients seeking a specific service. For instance, a hospital’s death rate for Medicare patients might be irrelevant for a woman trying to decide where to give birth.

The industry’s major trade groups said in a letter to the CMS that some hospitals perform poorly because their patients tend to be lower income and don’t have the support at home. Many of the nation’s most prestigious hospitals have been bracing for middling or poor ratings.

Rick Pollack, president of the American Hospital Association, said in a statement that “the delay is a necessary step as hospitals and health systems work with CMS to improve the ratings for patients, and the AHA commends CMS for their decision.”

Last year, the CMS created a star rating to represent the views of patients in surveys. Two sets of researchers recently determined that hospitals with more stars in patient experience tended to have lower death and readmission rates.

Hospital Compare received 3.7 million unique page views last year, according to an April 2016 paper published in the journal Health Affairs. The author, analyst Steven D. Findlay, called the traffic “not at a level commensurate with [the] stature and potential” of the federal government’s health care facility comparison sites.

Dr. Ashish Jha, a Harvard School of Public Health researcher, said consumers will be more likely to use the unified star ratings, but this specific mix of measures raises concerns. “The idea that dying and being readmitted to the hospital are equally important to patients seems funny to me,” he said.

Kaiser Health News is a national health policy news service that is part of the nonpartisan Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Bowing to pressure from the hospital industry and Congress, the Obama administration on April 20 delayed releasing its new hospital quality rating measure just a day before its planned launch.

The new “overall hospital quality” star rating aimed to combine the government’s disparate efforts to measure hospital care into one easy-to-grasp metric. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services now publishes more than 100 measures of aspects of hospital care, but many of these measures are technical and confusing since hospitals often do well on some and poorly on others. The new star rating boils 62 of the measures down into a unified rating of one to five stars, with five being the best.

©Daniel Mirer/thinkstockphotos.com

But this month, 60 senators and 225 members of the House of Representatives signed letters urging the CMS to delay releasing the star ratings. “We have heard from hospitals in our districts that they do not have the necessary data to replicate or evaluate the CMS’s work to ensure that the methodology is accurate or fair,” the letter from the House members said.

In a notice sent April 20, the CMS told Congress it would delay release of the star ratings on its Hospital Compare website until July 2016. The “CMS is committed to working with hospitals and associations to provide further guidance about star ratings,” the notice said. “After the star ratings go live in their first iteration, we will refine and improve the site as we work together and gain experience.”

But in a conference call with hospital representatives, the CMS officials said they might delay release of the ratings past July if they are still analyzing or revising the methodology, according to people who participated in the call.

Mortality, readmissions, patient experience, and safety of care metrics each accounted for 22% of the star rating, while measures of effectiveness of care, timeliness of care, and efficient use of medical imaging made up 12% in total.

©roobcio/Thinkstock

The hospital industry for months has been urging this delay, arguing that many of the measures will not be relevant to patients seeking a specific service. For instance, a hospital’s death rate for Medicare patients might be irrelevant for a woman trying to decide where to give birth.

The industry’s major trade groups said in a letter to the CMS that some hospitals perform poorly because their patients tend to be lower income and don’t have the support at home. Many of the nation’s most prestigious hospitals have been bracing for middling or poor ratings.

Rick Pollack, president of the American Hospital Association, said in a statement that “the delay is a necessary step as hospitals and health systems work with CMS to improve the ratings for patients, and the AHA commends CMS for their decision.”

Last year, the CMS created a star rating to represent the views of patients in surveys. Two sets of researchers recently determined that hospitals with more stars in patient experience tended to have lower death and readmission rates.

Hospital Compare received 3.7 million unique page views last year, according to an April 2016 paper published in the journal Health Affairs. The author, analyst Steven D. Findlay, called the traffic “not at a level commensurate with [the] stature and potential” of the federal government’s health care facility comparison sites.

Dr. Ashish Jha, a Harvard School of Public Health researcher, said consumers will be more likely to use the unified star ratings, but this specific mix of measures raises concerns. “The idea that dying and being readmitted to the hospital are equally important to patients seems funny to me,” he said.

Kaiser Health News is a national health policy news service that is part of the nonpartisan Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Bowing to pressure from the hospital industry and Congress, the Obama administration on April 20 delayed releasing its new hospital quality rating measure just a day before its planned launch.

The new “overall hospital quality” star rating aimed to combine the government’s disparate efforts to measure hospital care into one easy-to-grasp metric. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services now publishes more than 100 measures of aspects of hospital care, but many of these measures are technical and confusing since hospitals often do well on some and poorly on others. The new star rating boils 62 of the measures down into a unified rating of one to five stars, with five being the best.

©Daniel Mirer/thinkstockphotos.com

But this month, 60 senators and 225 members of the House of Representatives signed letters urging the CMS to delay releasing the star ratings. “We have heard from hospitals in our districts that they do not have the necessary data to replicate or evaluate the CMS’s work to ensure that the methodology is accurate or fair,” the letter from the House members said.

In a notice sent April 20, the CMS told Congress it would delay release of the star ratings on its Hospital Compare website until July 2016. The “CMS is committed to working with hospitals and associations to provide further guidance about star ratings,” the notice said. “After the star ratings go live in their first iteration, we will refine and improve the site as we work together and gain experience.”

But in a conference call with hospital representatives, the CMS officials said they might delay release of the ratings past July if they are still analyzing or revising the methodology, according to people who participated in the call.

Mortality, readmissions, patient experience, and safety of care metrics each accounted for 22% of the star rating, while measures of effectiveness of care, timeliness of care, and efficient use of medical imaging made up 12% in total.

©roobcio/Thinkstock

The hospital industry for months has been urging this delay, arguing that many of the measures will not be relevant to patients seeking a specific service. For instance, a hospital’s death rate for Medicare patients might be irrelevant for a woman trying to decide where to give birth.

The industry’s major trade groups said in a letter to the CMS that some hospitals perform poorly because their patients tend to be lower income and don’t have the support at home. Many of the nation’s most prestigious hospitals have been bracing for middling or poor ratings.

Rick Pollack, president of the American Hospital Association, said in a statement that “the delay is a necessary step as hospitals and health systems work with CMS to improve the ratings for patients, and the AHA commends CMS for their decision.”

Last year, the CMS created a star rating to represent the views of patients in surveys. Two sets of researchers recently determined that hospitals with more stars in patient experience tended to have lower death and readmission rates.

Hospital Compare received 3.7 million unique page views last year, according to an April 2016 paper published in the journal Health Affairs. The author, analyst Steven D. Findlay, called the traffic “not at a level commensurate with [the] stature and potential” of the federal government’s health care facility comparison sites.

Dr. Ashish Jha, a Harvard School of Public Health researcher, said consumers will be more likely to use the unified star ratings, but this specific mix of measures raises concerns. “The idea that dying and being readmitted to the hospital are equally important to patients seems funny to me,” he said.

Kaiser Health News is a national health policy news service that is part of the nonpartisan Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

VANCOUVER – The relationship between hospitals’ procedural volume and patient outcomes that has been observed for many cardiovascular interventions and other surgeries does not hold for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy procedures for acute ischemic stroke, according to an analysis of cases during 2008-2011 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

In-hospital mortality and rates for any complications were not associated with high or low endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EMT) volume at hospitals across the United States in the analysis of 13,502 adult patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke and treated with EMT, neurology resident Dr. Abhishek Lunagariya of the University of Florida, Gainesville, reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

A smaller prior study of 2,749 EMTs done in 296 hospitals in 2008 showed lower mortality in high-volume hospitals that performed 10 or more of the procedures per year (J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov; 22[8]:1263-9).

Of the 13,502 EMTs in the study, 25% occurred at low-volume hospitals performing less than 10 per year. Low-volume hospitals had higher in-hospital mortality than did higher-volume centers performing 10 or more of the procedures per year in an unadjusted comparison (26% vs. 21%). A comparison of a combined endpoint for any complications (in-hospital mortality, intracerebral hemorrhage, and vascular complications) was also significantly in favor of high-volume hospitals (34% vs. 30%).

However, in a multivariate hierarchical model, low-volume hospitals were not associated with higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.23) or rate of any complications (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.21). These analyses were adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, primary payer, median household income, hospital region/teaching status/location/bed size, Charlson Comorbidity Index, calendar year, and use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator.

Dr. Lunagariya noted that he and his associates could not adjust the comparisons for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores because they are not recorded in the National Inpatient Sample. They also could not examine what happened to patients after discharge.

Dr. Lunagariya suggested a variety of possible reasons that might help to explain the lack of an association between hospital procedure volume and outcomes after adjustment: the availability of better thrombectomy devices since the smaller 2008 study, lesser operator variability, favorable patient selection, and an increased skill set of operators working at low-volume hospitals.

One audience member noted that some endovascular interventionalists will operate at both high-volume and low-volume hospitals and could account for some of the findings. That indeed might be happening more often and needs to happen more often, Dr. Lunagariya said in an interview, in order to combat the “common belief” that it would be better to wait for a patient to undergo the procedure at a high- rather than low-volume hospital. Patients who receive initial care for stroke at a low-volume hospital but are not stable enough or do not have enough time to be transferred could benefit from EMT if an interventionalist who performs EMT drove there instead, he said.

With even newer devices now available that are thought to be easier to use, Dr. Lunagariya suggested that the similarity in outcomes at low- and higher-volume centers may not change in updated analyses of more recent EMT procedures for ischemic stroke.

The investigators received no funding for the study, and they reported having no financial disclosures.

[email protected]

VANCOUVER – The relationship between hospitals’ procedural volume and patient outcomes that has been observed for many cardiovascular interventions and other surgeries does not hold for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy procedures for acute ischemic stroke, according to an analysis of cases during 2008-2011 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

In-hospital mortality and rates for any complications were not associated with high or low endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EMT) volume at hospitals across the United States in the analysis of 13,502 adult patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke and treated with EMT, neurology resident Dr. Abhishek Lunagariya of the University of Florida, Gainesville, reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

A smaller prior study of 2,749 EMTs done in 296 hospitals in 2008 showed lower mortality in high-volume hospitals that performed 10 or more of the procedures per year (J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov; 22[8]:1263-9).

Of the 13,502 EMTs in the study, 25% occurred at low-volume hospitals performing less than 10 per year. Low-volume hospitals had higher in-hospital mortality than did higher-volume centers performing 10 or more of the procedures per year in an unadjusted comparison (26% vs. 21%). A comparison of a combined endpoint for any complications (in-hospital mortality, intracerebral hemorrhage, and vascular complications) was also significantly in favor of high-volume hospitals (34% vs. 30%).

However, in a multivariate hierarchical model, low-volume hospitals were not associated with higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.23) or rate of any complications (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.21). These analyses were adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, primary payer, median household income, hospital region/teaching status/location/bed size, Charlson Comorbidity Index, calendar year, and use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator.

Dr. Lunagariya noted that he and his associates could not adjust the comparisons for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores because they are not recorded in the National Inpatient Sample. They also could not examine what happened to patients after discharge.

Dr. Lunagariya suggested a variety of possible reasons that might help to explain the lack of an association between hospital procedure volume and outcomes after adjustment: the availability of better thrombectomy devices since the smaller 2008 study, lesser operator variability, favorable patient selection, and an increased skill set of operators working at low-volume hospitals.

One audience member noted that some endovascular interventionalists will operate at both high-volume and low-volume hospitals and could account for some of the findings. That indeed might be happening more often and needs to happen more often, Dr. Lunagariya said in an interview, in order to combat the “common belief” that it would be better to wait for a patient to undergo the procedure at a high- rather than low-volume hospital. Patients who receive initial care for stroke at a low-volume hospital but are not stable enough or do not have enough time to be transferred could benefit from EMT if an interventionalist who performs EMT drove there instead, he said.

With even newer devices now available that are thought to be easier to use, Dr. Lunagariya suggested that the similarity in outcomes at low- and higher-volume centers may not change in updated analyses of more recent EMT procedures for ischemic stroke.

The investigators received no funding for the study, and they reported having no financial disclosures.

[email protected]

VANCOUVER – The relationship between hospitals’ procedural volume and patient outcomes that has been observed for many cardiovascular interventions and other surgeries does not hold for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy procedures for acute ischemic stroke, according to an analysis of cases during 2008-2011 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

In-hospital mortality and rates for any complications were not associated with high or low endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EMT) volume at hospitals across the United States in the analysis of 13,502 adult patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke and treated with EMT, neurology resident Dr. Abhishek Lunagariya of the University of Florida, Gainesville, reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

A smaller prior study of 2,749 EMTs done in 296 hospitals in 2008 showed lower mortality in high-volume hospitals that performed 10 or more of the procedures per year (J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov; 22[8]:1263-9).

Of the 13,502 EMTs in the study, 25% occurred at low-volume hospitals performing less than 10 per year. Low-volume hospitals had higher in-hospital mortality than did higher-volume centers performing 10 or more of the procedures per year in an unadjusted comparison (26% vs. 21%). A comparison of a combined endpoint for any complications (in-hospital mortality, intracerebral hemorrhage, and vascular complications) was also significantly in favor of high-volume hospitals (34% vs. 30%).

However, in a multivariate hierarchical model, low-volume hospitals were not associated with higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.23) or rate of any complications (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.21). These analyses were adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, primary payer, median household income, hospital region/teaching status/location/bed size, Charlson Comorbidity Index, calendar year, and use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator.

Dr. Lunagariya noted that he and his associates could not adjust the comparisons for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores because they are not recorded in the National Inpatient Sample. They also could not examine what happened to patients after discharge.

Dr. Lunagariya suggested a variety of possible reasons that might help to explain the lack of an association between hospital procedure volume and outcomes after adjustment: the availability of better thrombectomy devices since the smaller 2008 study, lesser operator variability, favorable patient selection, and an increased skill set of operators working at low-volume hospitals.

One audience member noted that some endovascular interventionalists will operate at both high-volume and low-volume hospitals and could account for some of the findings. That indeed might be happening more often and needs to happen more often, Dr. Lunagariya said in an interview, in order to combat the “common belief” that it would be better to wait for a patient to undergo the procedure at a high- rather than low-volume hospital. Patients who receive initial care for stroke at a low-volume hospital but are not stable enough or do not have enough time to be transferred could benefit from EMT if an interventionalist who performs EMT drove there instead, he said.

With even newer devices now available that are thought to be easier to use, Dr. Lunagariya suggested that the similarity in outcomes at low- and higher-volume centers may not change in updated analyses of more recent EMT procedures for ischemic stroke.

The investigators received no funding for the study, and they reported having no financial disclosures.

[email protected]

Women with mutations in the BRCA1 gene are likely to have significantly reduced ovarian reserve, according to Dr. Kelly-Anne Phillips and her associates.

After adjusting for age, the average anti-Müllerian hormone concentration for the 172 BRCA1 mutation carriers tested was about 25% less than the 216 noncarriers tested. This difference remained after adjusting for oral contraceptive pill use at time of blood draw, BMI at cohort entry, cigarette smoking ever, length of time from blood draw to analysis, or exclusion of current oral contraceptive users and women who reported they were postmenopausal. The odds ratio for mutation carriers of having an AMH concentration in the lowest quartile was 1.84.

©Christian Jasiuk/Thinkstock

Average AMH concentration in women with BRCA2 mutations did not differ from women who do not carry the mutation. The odds ratio of having an AMH concentration in the lowest quartile for BRCA2 carriers was 0.87.

“Low AMH concentrations have not been shown to affect natural fecundability in young women but are associated with reduced fecundability in older women in their 30s,” the investigators wrote. “The reduced concentrations of AMH observed in this study were equivalent, for example, to a 2-year age increase for a woman in her mid 30s. Thus it is possible that the findings of our study might not translate to clinically relevant fertility implications for younger women, but may be important for the subgroup of BRCA1 mutation carriers who wish to conceive in their late 30s or 40s when fertility is reduced even in the general population.”

Find the full study in Human Reproduction (doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew044).

[email protected]

Women with mutations in the BRCA1 gene are likely to have significantly reduced ovarian reserve, according to Dr. Kelly-Anne Phillips and her associates.

After adjusting for age, the average anti-Müllerian hormone concentration for the 172 BRCA1 mutation carriers tested was about 25% less than the 216 noncarriers tested. This difference remained after adjusting for oral contraceptive pill use at time of blood draw, BMI at cohort entry, cigarette smoking ever, length of time from blood draw to analysis, or exclusion of current oral contraceptive users and women who reported they were postmenopausal. The odds ratio for mutation carriers of having an AMH concentration in the lowest quartile was 1.84.

©Christian Jasiuk/Thinkstock

Average AMH concentration in women with BRCA2 mutations did not differ from women who do not carry the mutation. The odds ratio of having an AMH concentration in the lowest quartile for BRCA2 carriers was 0.87.

“Low AMH concentrations have not been shown to affect natural fecundability in young women but are associated with reduced fecundability in older women in their 30s,” the investigators wrote. “The reduced concentrations of AMH observed in this study were equivalent, for example, to a 2-year age increase for a woman in her mid 30s. Thus it is possible that the findings of our study might not translate to clinically relevant fertility implications for younger women, but may be important for the subgroup of BRCA1 mutation carriers who wish to conceive in their late 30s or 40s when fertility is reduced even in the general population.”

Find the full study in Human Reproduction (doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew044).

[email protected]

Women with mutations in the BRCA1 gene are likely to have significantly reduced ovarian reserve, according to Dr. Kelly-Anne Phillips and her associates.

After adjusting for age, the average anti-Müllerian hormone concentration for the 172 BRCA1 mutation carriers tested was about 25% less than the 216 noncarriers tested. This difference remained after adjusting for oral contraceptive pill use at time of blood draw, BMI at cohort entry, cigarette smoking ever, length of time from blood draw to analysis, or exclusion of current oral contraceptive users and women who reported they were postmenopausal. The odds ratio for mutation carriers of having an AMH concentration in the lowest quartile was 1.84.

©Christian Jasiuk/Thinkstock

Average AMH concentration in women with BRCA2 mutations did not differ from women who do not carry the mutation. The odds ratio of having an AMH concentration in the lowest quartile for BRCA2 carriers was 0.87.

“Low AMH concentrations have not been shown to affect natural fecundability in young women but are associated with reduced fecundability in older women in their 30s,” the investigators wrote. “The reduced concentrations of AMH observed in this study were equivalent, for example, to a 2-year age increase for a woman in her mid 30s. Thus it is possible that the findings of our study might not translate to clinically relevant fertility implications for younger women, but may be important for the subgroup of BRCA1 mutation carriers who wish to conceive in their late 30s or 40s when fertility is reduced even in the general population.”

Find the full study in Human Reproduction (doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew044).

[email protected]

Stronger teamwork among researchers, sharing data, and realignment of incentives for scientific breakthroughs, in addition to more funding, are key steps needed to advance cancer research, Vice President Joe Biden said during the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR).

During a plenary speech to close the meeting, Vice President Biden praised the dedication of current cancer researchers and pledged to break down the walls that prevent them from achieving more progress in the field.

“I made a commitment that I will – as I gain this information and knowledge – I will eliminate the barriers that get in your way, get in the way of science and research and development,” he said. “I had to ... learn from all of you how we can proceed, how we can break down silos, how we can accommodate more rapidly the efforts you’re making.”

Vice President Biden, who is leading a new $1 billion initiative to eliminate cancer called “Moonshot,” outlined the top obstacles to cancer research he has garnered from recent visits with renowned cancer scientists and research leaders around the world. This includes a lack of unity among researchers, poor rewards for novel research, and limited data sharing, he said.

“The way the system now is set up, researchers are not incentivized to share their data,” Vice President Biden said, acknowledging that some medical experts are against the idea. “But every expert I’ve spoken to said you need to share these data to move this process rapidly.”

Involving patients earlier in clinical trials design is also a primary focus, he said. Patients should understand more about trials and be more open to signing up.

He noted the “incredible” research currently being conducted by various entities, such as AACR’s Project Genie, Orion Foundation, and The Parker Institute. Mr. Biden stressed however, that such efforts are too isolated.

“It raises [the] question: ‘Why is all this being done separately?’ ” Vice President Biden said. “Why is so much money being spent when if it’s aggregated, everyone acknowledges, the answers would come more quickly?”

Incentives for new research and the way in which funding is alloted must also be redesigned, he stressed. Today, it takes too long for researchers to get projects approved by the government and funding dispersed. He acknowledged the difficulty researchers face in obtaining grants and the fact that those who think “outside the box” are less likely to receive funding.

“It seems to me that we slow down our best minds by making them spend years in the lab before they can get their own grants and, when they do, they spend a third of their time writing a grant that takes months to be approved and awarded,” he said. “It’s like asking Derek Jeter to take several years off to sell bonds to build Yankee stadium.”

The Vice President did not purport to have all the answers, and asked those at the AARC meeting to provide feedback on his suggestions.

“The question I’d ask you to contemplate, because I’d like you to communicate with us, is, ‘Does it require realigning incentives; changing behaviors to take advantage of this inflection point? Does it require sharing more knowledge, treatment, and understanding? Or does that slow the process up?’ ”

He added,“I hope you all know it, but you’re one of the most valuable resources that our great country has, those of you sitting in this room. So ask your institutions, your colleagues, your mentors, your administrators: How can we move your ideas faster together in the interest of patients?”

The Vice President’s Moonshot initiative was announced during President Obama’s 2016 State of the Union Address. The effort includes a new Cancer Moonshot Task Force that will focus on federal investments, targeted incentives, private sector efforts from industry and philanthropy, patient engagement initiatives, and other mechanisms to support cancer research and enable progress in treatment and care, according to the White House. As part of the plan, the President’s fiscal 2017 budget proposes $755 million in mandatory funds for new cancer-related research activities at the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration. The initiative also includes increased investments by the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs in cancer research, including through funding centers of excellence focused on specific cancers and conducting longitudinal studies to determine risk factors and enhance treatment.

[email protected]

On Twitter @legal_med

Stronger teamwork among researchers, sharing data, and realignment of incentives for scientific breakthroughs, in addition to more funding, are key steps needed to advance cancer research, Vice President Joe Biden said during the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR).

During a plenary speech to close the meeting, Vice President Biden praised the dedication of current cancer researchers and pledged to break down the walls that prevent them from achieving more progress in the field.

“I made a commitment that I will – as I gain this information and knowledge – I will eliminate the barriers that get in your way, get in the way of science and research and development,” he said. “I had to ... learn from all of you how we can proceed, how we can break down silos, how we can accommodate more rapidly the efforts you’re making.”

Vice President Biden, who is leading a new $1 billion initiative to eliminate cancer called “Moonshot,” outlined the top obstacles to cancer research he has garnered from recent visits with renowned cancer scientists and research leaders around the world. This includes a lack of unity among researchers, poor rewards for novel research, and limited data sharing, he said.

“The way the system now is set up, researchers are not incentivized to share their data,” Vice President Biden said, acknowledging that some medical experts are against the idea. “But every expert I’ve spoken to said you need to share these data to move this process rapidly.”

Involving patients earlier in clinical trials design is also a primary focus, he said. Patients should understand more about trials and be more open to signing up.

He noted the “incredible” research currently being conducted by various entities, such as AACR’s Project Genie, Orion Foundation, and The Parker Institute. Mr. Biden stressed however, that such efforts are too isolated.

“It raises [the] question: ‘Why is all this being done separately?’ ” Vice President Biden said. “Why is so much money being spent when if it’s aggregated, everyone acknowledges, the answers would come more quickly?”

Incentives for new research and the way in which funding is alloted must also be redesigned, he stressed. Today, it takes too long for researchers to get projects approved by the government and funding dispersed. He acknowledged the difficulty researchers face in obtaining grants and the fact that those who think “outside the box” are less likely to receive funding.

“It seems to me that we slow down our best minds by making them spend years in the lab before they can get their own grants and, when they do, they spend a third of their time writing a grant that takes months to be approved and awarded,” he said. “It’s like asking Derek Jeter to take several years off to sell bonds to build Yankee stadium.”

The Vice President did not purport to have all the answers, and asked those at the AARC meeting to provide feedback on his suggestions.

“The question I’d ask you to contemplate, because I’d like you to communicate with us, is, ‘Does it require realigning incentives; changing behaviors to take advantage of this inflection point? Does it require sharing more knowledge, treatment, and understanding? Or does that slow the process up?’ ”

He added,“I hope you all know it, but you’re one of the most valuable resources that our great country has, those of you sitting in this room. So ask your institutions, your colleagues, your mentors, your administrators: How can we move your ideas faster together in the interest of patients?”

The Vice President’s Moonshot initiative was announced during President Obama’s 2016 State of the Union Address. The effort includes a new Cancer Moonshot Task Force that will focus on federal investments, targeted incentives, private sector efforts from industry and philanthropy, patient engagement initiatives, and other mechanisms to support cancer research and enable progress in treatment and care, according to the White House. As part of the plan, the President’s fiscal 2017 budget proposes $755 million in mandatory funds for new cancer-related research activities at the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration. The initiative also includes increased investments by the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs in cancer research, including through funding centers of excellence focused on specific cancers and conducting longitudinal studies to determine risk factors and enhance treatment.

[email protected]

On Twitter @legal_med

Stronger teamwork among researchers, sharing data, and realignment of incentives for scientific breakthroughs, in addition to more funding, are key steps needed to advance cancer research, Vice President Joe Biden said during the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR).

During a plenary speech to close the meeting, Vice President Biden praised the dedication of current cancer researchers and pledged to break down the walls that prevent them from achieving more progress in the field.

“I made a commitment that I will – as I gain this information and knowledge – I will eliminate the barriers that get in your way, get in the way of science and research and development,” he said. “I had to ... learn from all of you how we can proceed, how we can break down silos, how we can accommodate more rapidly the efforts you’re making.”

Vice President Biden, who is leading a new $1 billion initiative to eliminate cancer called “Moonshot,” outlined the top obstacles to cancer research he has garnered from recent visits with renowned cancer scientists and research leaders around the world. This includes a lack of unity among researchers, poor rewards for novel research, and limited data sharing, he said.

“The way the system now is set up, researchers are not incentivized to share their data,” Vice President Biden said, acknowledging that some medical experts are against the idea. “But every expert I’ve spoken to said you need to share these data to move this process rapidly.”

Involving patients earlier in clinical trials design is also a primary focus, he said. Patients should understand more about trials and be more open to signing up.

He noted the “incredible” research currently being conducted by various entities, such as AACR’s Project Genie, Orion Foundation, and The Parker Institute. Mr. Biden stressed however, that such efforts are too isolated.

“It raises [the] question: ‘Why is all this being done separately?’ ” Vice President Biden said. “Why is so much money being spent when if it’s aggregated, everyone acknowledges, the answers would come more quickly?”

Incentives for new research and the way in which funding is alloted must also be redesigned, he stressed. Today, it takes too long for researchers to get projects approved by the government and funding dispersed. He acknowledged the difficulty researchers face in obtaining grants and the fact that those who think “outside the box” are less likely to receive funding.

“It seems to me that we slow down our best minds by making them spend years in the lab before they can get their own grants and, when they do, they spend a third of their time writing a grant that takes months to be approved and awarded,” he said. “It’s like asking Derek Jeter to take several years off to sell bonds to build Yankee stadium.”

The Vice President did not purport to have all the answers, and asked those at the AARC meeting to provide feedback on his suggestions.

“The question I’d ask you to contemplate, because I’d like you to communicate with us, is, ‘Does it require realigning incentives; changing behaviors to take advantage of this inflection point? Does it require sharing more knowledge, treatment, and understanding? Or does that slow the process up?’ ”

He added,“I hope you all know it, but you’re one of the most valuable resources that our great country has, those of you sitting in this room. So ask your institutions, your colleagues, your mentors, your administrators: How can we move your ideas faster together in the interest of patients?”

The Vice President’s Moonshot initiative was announced during President Obama’s 2016 State of the Union Address. The effort includes a new Cancer Moonshot Task Force that will focus on federal investments, targeted incentives, private sector efforts from industry and philanthropy, patient engagement initiatives, and other mechanisms to support cancer research and enable progress in treatment and care, according to the White House. As part of the plan, the President’s fiscal 2017 budget proposes $755 million in mandatory funds for new cancer-related research activities at the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration. The initiative also includes increased investments by the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs in cancer research, including through funding centers of excellence focused on specific cancers and conducting longitudinal studies to determine risk factors and enhance treatment.

[email protected]

On Twitter @legal_med