Postpartum hypertension has a host of potential causes, some of which may be benign (such as the persistence of mild gestational hypertension or mild chronic hypertension) whereas others (such as severe de novo preeclampsia-eclampsia and HELLP syndrome [a complication of pregnancy characterized by hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and a low platelet count]) can be life threatening.

Management of persistent hypertension

The most common causes for persistent hypertension beyond 48 hours after delivery are GHTN, PE, or chronic hypertension. Initial management will depend on history, clinical findings, presence or absence of associated symptoms, results of laboratory findings (urine protein, platelet count, liver enzymes, serum creatinine, and electrolytes), and response to prior treatment of hypertension.

Certain medications that frequently are prescribed in the postpartum period, such as ergonovine and decongestants, should be discontinued if they are being used. These agents can aggravate preexisting hypertension or result in new-onset hypertension if used in large or frequent doses. Their use also may be associated with cerebral symptoms, nausea, and vomiting.

Subsequent management includes close observation until resolution of hypertension and associated symptoms. If the patient has hypertension only with no symptoms, no proteinuria, and normal laboratory findings, BP control is the focus; antihypertensives are used if systolic BP remains persistently greater than or equal to 150 mm Hg and/or if diastolic BP persists at greater than or equal to 100 mm Hg. Intravenous boluses of either labetalol or hydralazine or oral rapid-acting nifedipine are used initially if systolic BP is greater than or equal to 160 mm Hg or diastolic BP greater than or equal to 110 mm Hg persists for at least 30 minutes. This is followed by oral medication to keep systolic BP less than 150 mg Hg and diastolic BP less than 100 mm Hg.

For patients with persistent hypertension after GHTN or PE, I recommend oral long-acting nifedipine XL (30 mg every 12 hours) or oral labetalol (200 mg every 8-12 hours). Compared with labetalol, oral nifedipine is associated with improved renal blood flow with resultant diuresis, which makes it the drug of choice in women with volume overload. In some, it is necessary to switch to a new agent such as an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor; an ACE inhibitor is the drug of choice in those with pregestational diabetes mellitus, renal disease, or cardiomyopathy. In addition, thiazide or loop diuretics may be needed in women with circulatory overload and in those with pulmonary edema. Antihypertensives such as nifedipine, labetalol, furosemide, captopril, and enalapril are compatible with breastfeeding.

If the BP remains less than 150 mm Hg (systolic) and/or less than 100 mm Hg (diastolic) for 24 hours, and there are no maternal symptoms, the patient may be discharged home with instructions for daily BP measurements (self or by a visiting nurse) and the reporting of symptoms until her next visit in 1 week. Antihypertensives then are discontinued if the BP remains below the hypertensive levels for at least 48 hours. This may take 1 or several weeks to achieve.

Women with PE with severe features should receive close monitoring of BP and of symptoms during the immediate postpartum period, as well as accurate measurements of fluid intake, urinary output, and weight gain. These women often have received large amounts of IV fluids during labor as a result of prehydration before epidural analgesia, as well as IV fluids administered during the use of oxytocin and magnesium sulfate in labor and post partum. Mobilization of extracellular fluid also leads to increased intravascular volume. As a result, women who have PE with severe features – particularly those with abnormal renal function, capillary leak, or early-onset disease – are at increased risk for pulmonary edema and exacerbation of severe hypertension.

Careful evaluation of the volume of IV fluids, oral intake, blood products, urine output, respiratory symptoms, and vital signs is advised. Patients who develop tachycardia or respiratory symptoms such as dry cough, shortness of breath, or orthopnea also should be monitored with pulse oximetry and frequent chest auscultation, as well as chest x-ray.
 

New-onset severe symptoms

Because severe hypertension or PE with severe features may develop for the first time during the postpartum period, postpartum women – and the medical providers and personnel who respond to patient phone calls – should be well educated about the signs and symptoms of severe hypertension or PE. These include new-onset severe headaches that do not respond to maximum doses of analgesics, persistent severe visual changes, and new-onset epigastric pain with nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, orthopnea, shortness of breath, or palpitations. These women are at increased risk for eclampsia, pulmonary edema, stroke, and thromboembolism; these women require careful evaluation and potential hospitalization.

Severe new onset of persistent headaches and/or visual symptoms. Women with hypertension in association with new-onset persistent headaches and/or visual changes should be suspected to have severe PE. Patients who have hypertension with seizure should be initially treated as having eclampsia and should receive brain imaging to rule out other etiologies. Magnesium sulfate therapy must be initiated promptly for seizure prophylaxis and/or treatment. In addition, intravenous antihypertensive medications are recommended to lower BP to the desired goal while considering an alternative cause for the cerebral symptoms.

Women presenting with hypertension in association with refractory and/or thunderclap headaches, visual disturbances, or neurologic deficits should be evaluated for possible cerebrovascular complications such as reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), cerebral venous thrombosis, or stroke. These women will require selective diagnostic neuroimaging and consultation with neurology and/or neurosurgery. Such an evaluation may include CT scan for hemorrhage, MRI for detection of vasogenic edema and/or ischemia or infarction, cerebral angiography for diagnosis of RCVS, and cerebral venography for detection of cerebral venous thrombosis. Subsequent treatment will depend on the etiology.

Severe new-onset epigastric/right upper quadrant pain with nausea and vomiting. Women with persistent nausea, vomiting, or epigastric pain should be evaluated for HELLP syndrome because up to 30% who develop the syndrome do so post partum. The time of onset of clinical and laboratory findings ranges from 1 to 7 days post partum. Women are managed as they are before delivery, with the use of magnesium sulfate, antihypertensives, and close monitoring of vital signs and laboratory values.

In general, patients with HELLP syndrome will demonstrate an improvement in clinical and laboratory findings within 72 hours after treatment. If there is either no improvement or a deterioration in these findings, then it is important to consult with appropriate specialists for evaluation and subsequent management of possible rare syndromes such as acute fatty liver, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, hemolytic uremic syndrome, or exacerbation of lupus.

Severe new-onset shortness of breath, dyspnea, orthopnea, or palpitations. Women with these symptoms in the postpartum period should be evaluated for possible pulmonary edema, pulmonary embolism, or peripartum cardiomyopathy. Women with postpartum hypertension are at risk for pulmonary edema with onset at 3-6 days after delivery. Diagnosis is confirmed by physical exam (tachycardia, tachypnea), presence of rales on lung exam, pulse oximetry (oxygen saturation less than 93%), and chest x-ray, and echocardiography to exclude other etiologies. Treatment of pulmonary edema includes oxygen supplementation, 40 mg IV furosemide, control of severe hypertension, fluid restriction, and supportive care.

Remote prognosis

Recent research suggests that women who develop PE may be at increased risk for future cardiovascular disease such as heart failure, coronary artery disease, and stroke later in life. Indeed, many of the risk factors and pathophysiologic abnormalities of PE are similar to those of coronary artery disease.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Heart Association recommend that women with PE receive close observation in the postpartum period and careful evaluation in the first year after delivery to identify those who could benefit from early intervention to prevent subsequent cardiovascular disease. In general, when pregnancies are complicated by PE, there are opportunities for lifestyle and risk factor modification.
 

Dr. Sibai is professor of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive sciences at the University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston

Postpartum hypertension has a host of potential causes, some of which may be benign (such as the persistence of mild gestational hypertension or mild chronic hypertension) whereas others (such as severe de novo preeclampsia-eclampsia and HELLP syndrome [a complication of pregnancy characterized by hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and a low platelet count]) can be life threatening.

Management of persistent hypertension

The most common causes for persistent hypertension beyond 48 hours after delivery are GHTN, PE, or chronic hypertension. Initial management will depend on history, clinical findings, presence or absence of associated symptoms, results of laboratory findings (urine protein, platelet count, liver enzymes, serum creatinine, and electrolytes), and response to prior treatment of hypertension.

Certain medications that frequently are prescribed in the postpartum period, such as ergonovine and decongestants, should be discontinued if they are being used. These agents can aggravate preexisting hypertension or result in new-onset hypertension if used in large or frequent doses. Their use also may be associated with cerebral symptoms, nausea, and vomiting.

Subsequent management includes close observation until resolution of hypertension and associated symptoms. If the patient has hypertension only with no symptoms, no proteinuria, and normal laboratory findings, BP control is the focus; antihypertensives are used if systolic BP remains persistently greater than or equal to 150 mm Hg and/or if diastolic BP persists at greater than or equal to 100 mm Hg. Intravenous boluses of either labetalol or hydralazine or oral rapid-acting nifedipine are used initially if systolic BP is greater than or equal to 160 mm Hg or diastolic BP greater than or equal to 110 mm Hg persists for at least 30 minutes. This is followed by oral medication to keep systolic BP less than 150 mg Hg and diastolic BP less than 100 mm Hg.

For patients with persistent hypertension after GHTN or PE, I recommend oral long-acting nifedipine XL (30 mg every 12 hours) or oral labetalol (200 mg every 8-12 hours). Compared with labetalol, oral nifedipine is associated with improved renal blood flow with resultant diuresis, which makes it the drug of choice in women with volume overload. In some, it is necessary to switch to a new agent such as an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor; an ACE inhibitor is the drug of choice in those with pregestational diabetes mellitus, renal disease, or cardiomyopathy. In addition, thiazide or loop diuretics may be needed in women with circulatory overload and in those with pulmonary edema. Antihypertensives such as nifedipine, labetalol, furosemide, captopril, and enalapril are compatible with breastfeeding.

If the BP remains less than 150 mm Hg (systolic) and/or less than 100 mm Hg (diastolic) for 24 hours, and there are no maternal symptoms, the patient may be discharged home with instructions for daily BP measurements (self or by a visiting nurse) and the reporting of symptoms until her next visit in 1 week. Antihypertensives then are discontinued if the BP remains below the hypertensive levels for at least 48 hours. This may take 1 or several weeks to achieve.

Women with PE with severe features should receive close monitoring of BP and of symptoms during the immediate postpartum period, as well as accurate measurements of fluid intake, urinary output, and weight gain. These women often have received large amounts of IV fluids during labor as a result of prehydration before epidural analgesia, as well as IV fluids administered during the use of oxytocin and magnesium sulfate in labor and post partum. Mobilization of extracellular fluid also leads to increased intravascular volume. As a result, women who have PE with severe features – particularly those with abnormal renal function, capillary leak, or early-onset disease – are at increased risk for pulmonary edema and exacerbation of severe hypertension.

Careful evaluation of the volume of IV fluids, oral intake, blood products, urine output, respiratory symptoms, and vital signs is advised. Patients who develop tachycardia or respiratory symptoms such as dry cough, shortness of breath, or orthopnea also should be monitored with pulse oximetry and frequent chest auscultation, as well as chest x-ray.
 

New-onset severe symptoms

Because severe hypertension or PE with severe features may develop for the first time during the postpartum period, postpartum women – and the medical providers and personnel who respond to patient phone calls – should be well educated about the signs and symptoms of severe hypertension or PE. These include new-onset severe headaches that do not respond to maximum doses of analgesics, persistent severe visual changes, and new-onset epigastric pain with nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, orthopnea, shortness of breath, or palpitations. These women are at increased risk for eclampsia, pulmonary edema, stroke, and thromboembolism; these women require careful evaluation and potential hospitalization.

Severe new onset of persistent headaches and/or visual symptoms. Women with hypertension in association with new-onset persistent headaches and/or visual changes should be suspected to have severe PE. Patients who have hypertension with seizure should be initially treated as having eclampsia and should receive brain imaging to rule out other etiologies. Magnesium sulfate therapy must be initiated promptly for seizure prophylaxis and/or treatment. In addition, intravenous antihypertensive medications are recommended to lower BP to the desired goal while considering an alternative cause for the cerebral symptoms.

Women presenting with hypertension in association with refractory and/or thunderclap headaches, visual disturbances, or neurologic deficits should be evaluated for possible cerebrovascular complications such as reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), cerebral venous thrombosis, or stroke. These women will require selective diagnostic neuroimaging and consultation with neurology and/or neurosurgery. Such an evaluation may include CT scan for hemorrhage, MRI for detection of vasogenic edema and/or ischemia or infarction, cerebral angiography for diagnosis of RCVS, and cerebral venography for detection of cerebral venous thrombosis. Subsequent treatment will depend on the etiology.

Severe new-onset epigastric/right upper quadrant pain with nausea and vomiting. Women with persistent nausea, vomiting, or epigastric pain should be evaluated for HELLP syndrome because up to 30% who develop the syndrome do so post partum. The time of onset of clinical and laboratory findings ranges from 1 to 7 days post partum. Women are managed as they are before delivery, with the use of magnesium sulfate, antihypertensives, and close monitoring of vital signs and laboratory values.

In general, patients with HELLP syndrome will demonstrate an improvement in clinical and laboratory findings within 72 hours after treatment. If there is either no improvement or a deterioration in these findings, then it is important to consult with appropriate specialists for evaluation and subsequent management of possible rare syndromes such as acute fatty liver, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, hemolytic uremic syndrome, or exacerbation of lupus.

Severe new-onset shortness of breath, dyspnea, orthopnea, or palpitations. Women with these symptoms in the postpartum period should be evaluated for possible pulmonary edema, pulmonary embolism, or peripartum cardiomyopathy. Women with postpartum hypertension are at risk for pulmonary edema with onset at 3-6 days after delivery. Diagnosis is confirmed by physical exam (tachycardia, tachypnea), presence of rales on lung exam, pulse oximetry (oxygen saturation less than 93%), and chest x-ray, and echocardiography to exclude other etiologies. Treatment of pulmonary edema includes oxygen supplementation, 40 mg IV furosemide, control of severe hypertension, fluid restriction, and supportive care.

Remote prognosis

Recent research suggests that women who develop PE may be at increased risk for future cardiovascular disease such as heart failure, coronary artery disease, and stroke later in life. Indeed, many of the risk factors and pathophysiologic abnormalities of PE are similar to those of coronary artery disease.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Heart Association recommend that women with PE receive close observation in the postpartum period and careful evaluation in the first year after delivery to identify those who could benefit from early intervention to prevent subsequent cardiovascular disease. In general, when pregnancies are complicated by PE, there are opportunities for lifestyle and risk factor modification.
 

Dr. Sibai is professor of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive sciences at the University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston

Postpartum hypertension has a host of potential causes, some of which may be benign (such as the persistence of mild gestational hypertension or mild chronic hypertension) whereas others (such as severe de novo preeclampsia-eclampsia and HELLP syndrome [a complication of pregnancy characterized by hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and a low platelet count]) can be life threatening.

Management of persistent hypertension

The most common causes for persistent hypertension beyond 48 hours after delivery are GHTN, PE, or chronic hypertension. Initial management will depend on history, clinical findings, presence or absence of associated symptoms, results of laboratory findings (urine protein, platelet count, liver enzymes, serum creatinine, and electrolytes), and response to prior treatment of hypertension.

Certain medications that frequently are prescribed in the postpartum period, such as ergonovine and decongestants, should be discontinued if they are being used. These agents can aggravate preexisting hypertension or result in new-onset hypertension if used in large or frequent doses. Their use also may be associated with cerebral symptoms, nausea, and vomiting.

Subsequent management includes close observation until resolution of hypertension and associated symptoms. If the patient has hypertension only with no symptoms, no proteinuria, and normal laboratory findings, BP control is the focus; antihypertensives are used if systolic BP remains persistently greater than or equal to 150 mm Hg and/or if diastolic BP persists at greater than or equal to 100 mm Hg. Intravenous boluses of either labetalol or hydralazine or oral rapid-acting nifedipine are used initially if systolic BP is greater than or equal to 160 mm Hg or diastolic BP greater than or equal to 110 mm Hg persists for at least 30 minutes. This is followed by oral medication to keep systolic BP less than 150 mg Hg and diastolic BP less than 100 mm Hg.

For patients with persistent hypertension after GHTN or PE, I recommend oral long-acting nifedipine XL (30 mg every 12 hours) or oral labetalol (200 mg every 8-12 hours). Compared with labetalol, oral nifedipine is associated with improved renal blood flow with resultant diuresis, which makes it the drug of choice in women with volume overload. In some, it is necessary to switch to a new agent such as an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor; an ACE inhibitor is the drug of choice in those with pregestational diabetes mellitus, renal disease, or cardiomyopathy. In addition, thiazide or loop diuretics may be needed in women with circulatory overload and in those with pulmonary edema. Antihypertensives such as nifedipine, labetalol, furosemide, captopril, and enalapril are compatible with breastfeeding.

If the BP remains less than 150 mm Hg (systolic) and/or less than 100 mm Hg (diastolic) for 24 hours, and there are no maternal symptoms, the patient may be discharged home with instructions for daily BP measurements (self or by a visiting nurse) and the reporting of symptoms until her next visit in 1 week. Antihypertensives then are discontinued if the BP remains below the hypertensive levels for at least 48 hours. This may take 1 or several weeks to achieve.

Women with PE with severe features should receive close monitoring of BP and of symptoms during the immediate postpartum period, as well as accurate measurements of fluid intake, urinary output, and weight gain. These women often have received large amounts of IV fluids during labor as a result of prehydration before epidural analgesia, as well as IV fluids administered during the use of oxytocin and magnesium sulfate in labor and post partum. Mobilization of extracellular fluid also leads to increased intravascular volume. As a result, women who have PE with severe features – particularly those with abnormal renal function, capillary leak, or early-onset disease – are at increased risk for pulmonary edema and exacerbation of severe hypertension.

Careful evaluation of the volume of IV fluids, oral intake, blood products, urine output, respiratory symptoms, and vital signs is advised. Patients who develop tachycardia or respiratory symptoms such as dry cough, shortness of breath, or orthopnea also should be monitored with pulse oximetry and frequent chest auscultation, as well as chest x-ray.
 

New-onset severe symptoms

Because severe hypertension or PE with severe features may develop for the first time during the postpartum period, postpartum women – and the medical providers and personnel who respond to patient phone calls – should be well educated about the signs and symptoms of severe hypertension or PE. These include new-onset severe headaches that do not respond to maximum doses of analgesics, persistent severe visual changes, and new-onset epigastric pain with nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, orthopnea, shortness of breath, or palpitations. These women are at increased risk for eclampsia, pulmonary edema, stroke, and thromboembolism; these women require careful evaluation and potential hospitalization.

Severe new onset of persistent headaches and/or visual symptoms. Women with hypertension in association with new-onset persistent headaches and/or visual changes should be suspected to have severe PE. Patients who have hypertension with seizure should be initially treated as having eclampsia and should receive brain imaging to rule out other etiologies. Magnesium sulfate therapy must be initiated promptly for seizure prophylaxis and/or treatment. In addition, intravenous antihypertensive medications are recommended to lower BP to the desired goal while considering an alternative cause for the cerebral symptoms.

Women presenting with hypertension in association with refractory and/or thunderclap headaches, visual disturbances, or neurologic deficits should be evaluated for possible cerebrovascular complications such as reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), cerebral venous thrombosis, or stroke. These women will require selective diagnostic neuroimaging and consultation with neurology and/or neurosurgery. Such an evaluation may include CT scan for hemorrhage, MRI for detection of vasogenic edema and/or ischemia or infarction, cerebral angiography for diagnosis of RCVS, and cerebral venography for detection of cerebral venous thrombosis. Subsequent treatment will depend on the etiology.

Severe new-onset epigastric/right upper quadrant pain with nausea and vomiting. Women with persistent nausea, vomiting, or epigastric pain should be evaluated for HELLP syndrome because up to 30% who develop the syndrome do so post partum. The time of onset of clinical and laboratory findings ranges from 1 to 7 days post partum. Women are managed as they are before delivery, with the use of magnesium sulfate, antihypertensives, and close monitoring of vital signs and laboratory values.

In general, patients with HELLP syndrome will demonstrate an improvement in clinical and laboratory findings within 72 hours after treatment. If there is either no improvement or a deterioration in these findings, then it is important to consult with appropriate specialists for evaluation and subsequent management of possible rare syndromes such as acute fatty liver, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, hemolytic uremic syndrome, or exacerbation of lupus.

Severe new-onset shortness of breath, dyspnea, orthopnea, or palpitations. Women with these symptoms in the postpartum period should be evaluated for possible pulmonary edema, pulmonary embolism, or peripartum cardiomyopathy. Women with postpartum hypertension are at risk for pulmonary edema with onset at 3-6 days after delivery. Diagnosis is confirmed by physical exam (tachycardia, tachypnea), presence of rales on lung exam, pulse oximetry (oxygen saturation less than 93%), and chest x-ray, and echocardiography to exclude other etiologies. Treatment of pulmonary edema includes oxygen supplementation, 40 mg IV furosemide, control of severe hypertension, fluid restriction, and supportive care.

Remote prognosis

Recent research suggests that women who develop PE may be at increased risk for future cardiovascular disease such as heart failure, coronary artery disease, and stroke later in life. Indeed, many of the risk factors and pathophysiologic abnormalities of PE are similar to those of coronary artery disease.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Heart Association recommend that women with PE receive close observation in the postpartum period and careful evaluation in the first year after delivery to identify those who could benefit from early intervention to prevent subsequent cardiovascular disease. In general, when pregnancies are complicated by PE, there are opportunities for lifestyle and risk factor modification.
 

Dr. Sibai is professor of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive sciences at the University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston

At age 35, a woman underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. About 1 month later, she began vomiting and became unable to keep down any food or liquids. She was admitted to the hospital.

Two days after her admission, a dietitian evaluated the patient and recommended that she receive total parenteral nutrition (TPN). However, the attending physician did not order TPN during the patient’s 12-day hospital stay. As a result, the patient experienced vitamin deficiencies, including low thiamine. The patient developed symptoms of neurologic complications but was discharged.

Within 1 week, she was readmitted with the same symptoms, as well as signs of delirium and reduced level of consciousness. Her mental state continued to decline, and she became comatose for a period of time.

The patient now has Wernicke encephalopathy, which she alleged was caused by a lack of thiamine. She has no short-term memory, is wheelchair bound, and lives in a nursing home.

VERDICT

The jury found in favor of the plaintiff, awarding her $14,285,505.86 in damages, including $133,202 for loss of past earning capacity, $888,429 for loss of earning capacity, and $13,263,874.86 for medical care expenses.

COMMENTARY

It is foolish to think of diet as ancillary to medicine. While we often consider the long-term health implications of diet—obesity, atherosclerosis—we may overlook the urgent and emergent conditions that can result from a patient’s diet.

A familiar example is hypoglycemia. We associate it with agents used to treat diabetes. But it also can occur in the context of renal failure, tumor, severe infection, alcohol, or starvation. Similarly, thiamine deficiency would be an obvious consideration in a patient who presented in a coma or with altered mental status. But, as this case shows, thiamine deficiency can sneak up on you. 

Continue to: In this case...

In this case, the patient’s altered structural anatomy rendered her more susceptible to thiamine deficiency, which was ultimately found to be causally related to the physician’s failure to order TPN. This raises an important issue in the management of patients who have had bariatric procedures.

This plaintiff had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, a significant procedure that short circuits a sizable portion of the stomach and about 75 to 100 cm of the small intestine. This surgery carries long-term risks including bowel obstruction, hernias, ulcers, dumping syndrome, low blood sugar, and malnutrition. The last of these can manifest as low levels of B₁₂, folate, thiamine, iron, calcium, and vitamin D.

Roux-en-Y bypass requires adherence to dietary recommendations, lifelong vitamin/mineral supplementation, and follow-up compliance. Patients who have had bariatric procedures are at increased risk for complications—which also raise malpractice risks. Clinicians must be aware that patients who have had a bariatric procedure have altered anatomy. We must take steps to understand the nature of those alterations and how they impact the present clinical picture.

In this case, the altered anatomy in combination with the failure to order TPN resulted in Wernicke encephalopathy—a condition caused by a biochemical lesion that occurs after stores of B vitamin are exhausted. Classic Wernicke encephalopathy is advertised as a triad of ophthalmoplegia, ataxia, and confusion, but only 10% of patients will demonstrate a true triad. 

Wernicke encephalopathy typically occurs in the setting of alcoholism. However, certain other conditions can cause it, including recurrent dialysis, uremia, hyperemesis, thyrotoxicosis, cancer, AIDS, and starvation. It may be caused by surgical GI changes (eg, gastric bypass and banding) and nonsurgical GI causes (eg, pancreatitis, liver dysfunction, chronic diarrhea, celiac disease, and Crohn disease).

Continue to: Prognosis depends on...

Prognosis depends on how quickly the condition is recognized. Prompt treatment can lead to cure. But treatment delays (or lack of treatment) give the disorder the opportunity to progress, and memory and learning impairment may not completely resolve. Mortality in those untreated is 10% to 20%. And 80% of untreated or undertreated patients will develop Korsakoff psychosis, with severe retrograde and anterograde amnesia, disorientation, and emotional changes.

These factors make Wernicke encephalopathy a medical malpractice risk. If the diagnosis is missed, the damage is clear, substantial, and irreversible—as seen in this unfortunate case. This plaintiff’s attorney had a dream of a closing argument to make: Her client will suffer the effects of brain damage, robbing her of her life, her memory, and her very personality. This damage could have been prevented—not through use of an experimental new procedure or an investigational drug, but through use of a simple and readily available vitamin.

Worse still, cases such as this can involve a punitive element. Jurors would be invited to conclude that treating clinicians ignored the patient and left her to starve in her own bed. Always act in the patient’s best interest—and be attuned to situations that may evolve into claims that the patient was abandoned, neglected, or ignored.

Finally, you must address anything in the patient’s written record that is contrary to your plan. The fact pattern makes clear that a nutritional evaluation was obtained 2 days after the plaintiff’s admission. The dietitian recommended TPN. The record is not clear on why the physician did not order it. If you plan to take an action at odds with a prior observation or recommendation, be sure to clearly explain the rationale supporting your course of treatment. If you perform a risk-benefit analysis that leads you to a different conclusion, document that in the record—preferably with a second opinion from another clinician who supports your decision to deviate from the recommendation.

IN SUMMARY

Nutrition can be critically important. Make sure you consider both short- and long-term consequences of nutritional deficiencies. Bariatric surgery patients have altered anatomy, so be cautious with them. Consider the possibility of thiamine encephalopathy—which can be devastating—when the setting is suggestive. And make sure that all recommendations from other clinicians recorded in the patient’s chart are acted on. If you select a course of treatment that departs from prior recommendation, make clear your risk-benefit analysis and consider obtaining a second opinion in support of your decision.

At age 35, a woman underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. About 1 month later, she began vomiting and became unable to keep down any food or liquids. She was admitted to the hospital.

Two days after her admission, a dietitian evaluated the patient and recommended that she receive total parenteral nutrition (TPN). However, the attending physician did not order TPN during the patient’s 12-day hospital stay. As a result, the patient experienced vitamin deficiencies, including low thiamine. The patient developed symptoms of neurologic complications but was discharged.

Within 1 week, she was readmitted with the same symptoms, as well as signs of delirium and reduced level of consciousness. Her mental state continued to decline, and she became comatose for a period of time.

The patient now has Wernicke encephalopathy, which she alleged was caused by a lack of thiamine. She has no short-term memory, is wheelchair bound, and lives in a nursing home.

VERDICT

The jury found in favor of the plaintiff, awarding her $14,285,505.86 in damages, including $133,202 for loss of past earning capacity, $888,429 for loss of earning capacity, and $13,263,874.86 for medical care expenses.

COMMENTARY

It is foolish to think of diet as ancillary to medicine. While we often consider the long-term health implications of diet—obesity, atherosclerosis—we may overlook the urgent and emergent conditions that can result from a patient’s diet.

A familiar example is hypoglycemia. We associate it with agents used to treat diabetes. But it also can occur in the context of renal failure, tumor, severe infection, alcohol, or starvation. Similarly, thiamine deficiency would be an obvious consideration in a patient who presented in a coma or with altered mental status. But, as this case shows, thiamine deficiency can sneak up on you. 

Continue to: In this case...

In this case, the patient’s altered structural anatomy rendered her more susceptible to thiamine deficiency, which was ultimately found to be causally related to the physician’s failure to order TPN. This raises an important issue in the management of patients who have had bariatric procedures.

This plaintiff had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, a significant procedure that short circuits a sizable portion of the stomach and about 75 to 100 cm of the small intestine. This surgery carries long-term risks including bowel obstruction, hernias, ulcers, dumping syndrome, low blood sugar, and malnutrition. The last of these can manifest as low levels of B₁₂, folate, thiamine, iron, calcium, and vitamin D.

Roux-en-Y bypass requires adherence to dietary recommendations, lifelong vitamin/mineral supplementation, and follow-up compliance. Patients who have had bariatric procedures are at increased risk for complications—which also raise malpractice risks. Clinicians must be aware that patients who have had a bariatric procedure have altered anatomy. We must take steps to understand the nature of those alterations and how they impact the present clinical picture.

In this case, the altered anatomy in combination with the failure to order TPN resulted in Wernicke encephalopathy—a condition caused by a biochemical lesion that occurs after stores of B vitamin are exhausted. Classic Wernicke encephalopathy is advertised as a triad of ophthalmoplegia, ataxia, and confusion, but only 10% of patients will demonstrate a true triad. 

Wernicke encephalopathy typically occurs in the setting of alcoholism. However, certain other conditions can cause it, including recurrent dialysis, uremia, hyperemesis, thyrotoxicosis, cancer, AIDS, and starvation. It may be caused by surgical GI changes (eg, gastric bypass and banding) and nonsurgical GI causes (eg, pancreatitis, liver dysfunction, chronic diarrhea, celiac disease, and Crohn disease).

Continue to: Prognosis depends on...

Prognosis depends on how quickly the condition is recognized. Prompt treatment can lead to cure. But treatment delays (or lack of treatment) give the disorder the opportunity to progress, and memory and learning impairment may not completely resolve. Mortality in those untreated is 10% to 20%. And 80% of untreated or undertreated patients will develop Korsakoff psychosis, with severe retrograde and anterograde amnesia, disorientation, and emotional changes.

These factors make Wernicke encephalopathy a medical malpractice risk. If the diagnosis is missed, the damage is clear, substantial, and irreversible—as seen in this unfortunate case. This plaintiff’s attorney had a dream of a closing argument to make: Her client will suffer the effects of brain damage, robbing her of her life, her memory, and her very personality. This damage could have been prevented—not through use of an experimental new procedure or an investigational drug, but through use of a simple and readily available vitamin.

Worse still, cases such as this can involve a punitive element. Jurors would be invited to conclude that treating clinicians ignored the patient and left her to starve in her own bed. Always act in the patient’s best interest—and be attuned to situations that may evolve into claims that the patient was abandoned, neglected, or ignored.

Finally, you must address anything in the patient’s written record that is contrary to your plan. The fact pattern makes clear that a nutritional evaluation was obtained 2 days after the plaintiff’s admission. The dietitian recommended TPN. The record is not clear on why the physician did not order it. If you plan to take an action at odds with a prior observation or recommendation, be sure to clearly explain the rationale supporting your course of treatment. If you perform a risk-benefit analysis that leads you to a different conclusion, document that in the record—preferably with a second opinion from another clinician who supports your decision to deviate from the recommendation.

IN SUMMARY

Nutrition can be critically important. Make sure you consider both short- and long-term consequences of nutritional deficiencies. Bariatric surgery patients have altered anatomy, so be cautious with them. Consider the possibility of thiamine encephalopathy—which can be devastating—when the setting is suggestive. And make sure that all recommendations from other clinicians recorded in the patient’s chart are acted on. If you select a course of treatment that departs from prior recommendation, make clear your risk-benefit analysis and consider obtaining a second opinion in support of your decision.

At age 35, a woman underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. About 1 month later, she began vomiting and became unable to keep down any food or liquids. She was admitted to the hospital.

Two days after her admission, a dietitian evaluated the patient and recommended that she receive total parenteral nutrition (TPN). However, the attending physician did not order TPN during the patient’s 12-day hospital stay. As a result, the patient experienced vitamin deficiencies, including low thiamine. The patient developed symptoms of neurologic complications but was discharged.

Within 1 week, she was readmitted with the same symptoms, as well as signs of delirium and reduced level of consciousness. Her mental state continued to decline, and she became comatose for a period of time.

The patient now has Wernicke encephalopathy, which she alleged was caused by a lack of thiamine. She has no short-term memory, is wheelchair bound, and lives in a nursing home.

VERDICT

The jury found in favor of the plaintiff, awarding her $14,285,505.86 in damages, including $133,202 for loss of past earning capacity, $888,429 for loss of earning capacity, and $13,263,874.86 for medical care expenses.

COMMENTARY

It is foolish to think of diet as ancillary to medicine. While we often consider the long-term health implications of diet—obesity, atherosclerosis—we may overlook the urgent and emergent conditions that can result from a patient’s diet.

A familiar example is hypoglycemia. We associate it with agents used to treat diabetes. But it also can occur in the context of renal failure, tumor, severe infection, alcohol, or starvation. Similarly, thiamine deficiency would be an obvious consideration in a patient who presented in a coma or with altered mental status. But, as this case shows, thiamine deficiency can sneak up on you. 

Continue to: In this case...

In this case, the patient’s altered structural anatomy rendered her more susceptible to thiamine deficiency, which was ultimately found to be causally related to the physician’s failure to order TPN. This raises an important issue in the management of patients who have had bariatric procedures.

This plaintiff had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, a significant procedure that short circuits a sizable portion of the stomach and about 75 to 100 cm of the small intestine. This surgery carries long-term risks including bowel obstruction, hernias, ulcers, dumping syndrome, low blood sugar, and malnutrition. The last of these can manifest as low levels of B₁₂, folate, thiamine, iron, calcium, and vitamin D.

Roux-en-Y bypass requires adherence to dietary recommendations, lifelong vitamin/mineral supplementation, and follow-up compliance. Patients who have had bariatric procedures are at increased risk for complications—which also raise malpractice risks. Clinicians must be aware that patients who have had a bariatric procedure have altered anatomy. We must take steps to understand the nature of those alterations and how they impact the present clinical picture.

In this case, the altered anatomy in combination with the failure to order TPN resulted in Wernicke encephalopathy—a condition caused by a biochemical lesion that occurs after stores of B vitamin are exhausted. Classic Wernicke encephalopathy is advertised as a triad of ophthalmoplegia, ataxia, and confusion, but only 10% of patients will demonstrate a true triad. 

Wernicke encephalopathy typically occurs in the setting of alcoholism. However, certain other conditions can cause it, including recurrent dialysis, uremia, hyperemesis, thyrotoxicosis, cancer, AIDS, and starvation. It may be caused by surgical GI changes (eg, gastric bypass and banding) and nonsurgical GI causes (eg, pancreatitis, liver dysfunction, chronic diarrhea, celiac disease, and Crohn disease).

Continue to: Prognosis depends on...

Prognosis depends on how quickly the condition is recognized. Prompt treatment can lead to cure. But treatment delays (or lack of treatment) give the disorder the opportunity to progress, and memory and learning impairment may not completely resolve. Mortality in those untreated is 10% to 20%. And 80% of untreated or undertreated patients will develop Korsakoff psychosis, with severe retrograde and anterograde amnesia, disorientation, and emotional changes.

These factors make Wernicke encephalopathy a medical malpractice risk. If the diagnosis is missed, the damage is clear, substantial, and irreversible—as seen in this unfortunate case. This plaintiff’s attorney had a dream of a closing argument to make: Her client will suffer the effects of brain damage, robbing her of her life, her memory, and her very personality. This damage could have been prevented—not through use of an experimental new procedure or an investigational drug, but through use of a simple and readily available vitamin.

Worse still, cases such as this can involve a punitive element. Jurors would be invited to conclude that treating clinicians ignored the patient and left her to starve in her own bed. Always act in the patient’s best interest—and be attuned to situations that may evolve into claims that the patient was abandoned, neglected, or ignored.

Finally, you must address anything in the patient’s written record that is contrary to your plan. The fact pattern makes clear that a nutritional evaluation was obtained 2 days after the plaintiff’s admission. The dietitian recommended TPN. The record is not clear on why the physician did not order it. If you plan to take an action at odds with a prior observation or recommendation, be sure to clearly explain the rationale supporting your course of treatment. If you perform a risk-benefit analysis that leads you to a different conclusion, document that in the record—preferably with a second opinion from another clinician who supports your decision to deviate from the recommendation.

IN SUMMARY

Nutrition can be critically important. Make sure you consider both short- and long-term consequences of nutritional deficiencies. Bariatric surgery patients have altered anatomy, so be cautious with them. Consider the possibility of thiamine encephalopathy—which can be devastating—when the setting is suggestive. And make sure that all recommendations from other clinicians recorded in the patient’s chart are acted on. If you select a course of treatment that departs from prior recommendation, make clear your risk-benefit analysis and consider obtaining a second opinion in support of your decision.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved siponimod (Mayzent) tablets for the treatment of adults with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), including clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting MS, and active secondary progressive MS.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License

Siponimod is a selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator that binds to S1P1 and S1P5 receptors. Its binding to the S1P1 receptor prevents lymphocytes from leaving the lymph nodes, which contributes to the treatment’s anti-inflammatory effects. Its binding to the S1P5 and S1P1 subreceptors on oligodendrocytes and astrocytes is intended to promote remyelination and prevent inflammation.

The treatment’s approval is based on the results of the phase 3 EXPAND study, according to the agency’s March 26 announcement. This randomized, double-blind study compared siponimod with placebo among 1,651 patients with secondary progressive MS. At baseline, the population’s mean age was 48 years, and mean disease duration was approximately 16 years. More than half the study population had a median Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 6.0 and relied on a walking aid.

Siponimod reduced the risk of 3-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) by 21%, compared with placebo (P = .013). Among participants with relapse activity in the 2 years prior to screening, siponimod reduced the risk of this outcome by 33%, compared with placebo (P = .0100). Siponimod delayed the risk of 6-month CDP by 26%, compared with placebo (P = .0058) and reduced the annualized relapse rate by 55%. In addition, the data suggested beneficial effects of siponimod on cognition, MRI disease activity, and brain volume loss. Siponimod did not provide significant improvements in patients with nonactive secondary progressive MS.

Common adverse events included headache, hypertension, and transaminase increase. The FDA requires siponimod to be dispensed with a medication guide that describes the treatment’s associated risks of infection, macular edema, decreased heart rate, and impaired lung function.

Novartis manufactures the drug. The company expects the drug to be available within 1 week, according to its press release.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved siponimod (Mayzent) tablets for the treatment of adults with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), including clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting MS, and active secondary progressive MS.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License

Siponimod is a selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator that binds to S1P1 and S1P5 receptors. Its binding to the S1P1 receptor prevents lymphocytes from leaving the lymph nodes, which contributes to the treatment’s anti-inflammatory effects. Its binding to the S1P5 and S1P1 subreceptors on oligodendrocytes and astrocytes is intended to promote remyelination and prevent inflammation.

The treatment’s approval is based on the results of the phase 3 EXPAND study, according to the agency’s March 26 announcement. This randomized, double-blind study compared siponimod with placebo among 1,651 patients with secondary progressive MS. At baseline, the population’s mean age was 48 years, and mean disease duration was approximately 16 years. More than half the study population had a median Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 6.0 and relied on a walking aid.

Siponimod reduced the risk of 3-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) by 21%, compared with placebo (P = .013). Among participants with relapse activity in the 2 years prior to screening, siponimod reduced the risk of this outcome by 33%, compared with placebo (P = .0100). Siponimod delayed the risk of 6-month CDP by 26%, compared with placebo (P = .0058) and reduced the annualized relapse rate by 55%. In addition, the data suggested beneficial effects of siponimod on cognition, MRI disease activity, and brain volume loss. Siponimod did not provide significant improvements in patients with nonactive secondary progressive MS.

Common adverse events included headache, hypertension, and transaminase increase. The FDA requires siponimod to be dispensed with a medication guide that describes the treatment’s associated risks of infection, macular edema, decreased heart rate, and impaired lung function.

Novartis manufactures the drug. The company expects the drug to be available within 1 week, according to its press release.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved siponimod (Mayzent) tablets for the treatment of adults with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), including clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting MS, and active secondary progressive MS.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License

Siponimod is a selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator that binds to S1P1 and S1P5 receptors. Its binding to the S1P1 receptor prevents lymphocytes from leaving the lymph nodes, which contributes to the treatment’s anti-inflammatory effects. Its binding to the S1P5 and S1P1 subreceptors on oligodendrocytes and astrocytes is intended to promote remyelination and prevent inflammation.

The treatment’s approval is based on the results of the phase 3 EXPAND study, according to the agency’s March 26 announcement. This randomized, double-blind study compared siponimod with placebo among 1,651 patients with secondary progressive MS. At baseline, the population’s mean age was 48 years, and mean disease duration was approximately 16 years. More than half the study population had a median Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 6.0 and relied on a walking aid.

Siponimod reduced the risk of 3-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) by 21%, compared with placebo (P = .013). Among participants with relapse activity in the 2 years prior to screening, siponimod reduced the risk of this outcome by 33%, compared with placebo (P = .0100). Siponimod delayed the risk of 6-month CDP by 26%, compared with placebo (P = .0058) and reduced the annualized relapse rate by 55%. In addition, the data suggested beneficial effects of siponimod on cognition, MRI disease activity, and brain volume loss. Siponimod did not provide significant improvements in patients with nonactive secondary progressive MS.

Common adverse events included headache, hypertension, and transaminase increase. The FDA requires siponimod to be dispensed with a medication guide that describes the treatment’s associated risks of infection, macular edema, decreased heart rate, and impaired lung function.

Novartis manufactures the drug. The company expects the drug to be available within 1 week, according to its press release.

[email protected]

To the Editor:

The tongue is composed of 4 different types of papillae: fungiform, foliate, circumvallate, and filiform. Fungiform papillae, primarily located on the tip and sides of the tongue, are mushroom-shaped epithelial elevations composed of taste buds at the upper surface overlying a core of connective tissue.¹ Foliate and circumvallate papillae are likewise associated with taste buds, while the filiform papillae are hypothesized to exclusively provide a frictional surface for proper food manipulation. Pigmented fungiform papillae of the tongue (PFPT) was first reported by Leonard² in 1905, who described discrete hyperpigmentation present only on the surface of fungiform papillae, mainly in black patients. Although they have been primarily described in black individuals, PFPT also has been occasionally reported in Asian and Middle Eastern individuals as well as Indian women.^3-6

A 36-year-old Indian man initially presented to his primary care provider with brown discoloration of the dorsolateral aspects of the tongue that had been present since childhood. His primary care provider was concerned about a potential syndrome or systemic illness and referred the patient to dermatology for further evaluation. The patient denied any oral mucosal bleeding or discomfort, and a review of systems was unremarkable. His medical and family history were otherwise noncontributory, and he denied a history of tobacco use.

Physical examination of the tongue and oral mucosa revealed numerous 0.5- to 1.0-mm brown papillae in a symmetric distribution, primarily located on the tip and lateral aspects of the tongue (Figure). No hyperpigmentation was present on the posterior aspect of the tongue or on any other mucosal surface. Routine laboratory values were notable for mild elevations in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase (47 U/L [reference range, 10–30 U/L] and 64 U/L [reference range, 10–40 U/L], respectively) and mild hyperbilirubinemia (total bilirubin, 1.8 mg/dL [reference range, 0.3–1.2 mg/dL]). A complete blood cell count and electrolytes were within reference range. Based on the clinical appearance of the lesions and their presence since childhood, the patient was diagnosed with PFPT. No intervention was undertaken, and the patient was reassured of the benign nature of the lesions.

Pigmented fungiform papillae of the tongue presents in 3 variants. The first variant involves hyperpigmentation of all fungiform papillae located on the lateral and frontal aspects of the tongue and is the most common manifestation of PFPT.³ Our patient falls into this category. The second and third variants involve the dorsal surface, with the former involving only a few fungiform papillae on the dorsal aspect of the tongue and the latter variant involving all papillae.³ In 1974, Holzwanger et al³ conducted a survey of 300 random individuals, finding that 30% of black women and 25% of black men had some hyperpigmentation of the tongue, while only 1 white individual demonstrated lingual pigmentation. The physiology of PFPT remains largely unknown. Dermoscopic evaluation often demonstrates elevations with pigmented borders in a rose petal shape.⁷ Histopathologic evaluation reveals melanophages without inflammation that are positive for melanin on Fontana-Masson silver staining but negative for iron on Prussian blue staining.⁸

Despite the fact that PFPT is not a rare condition, the diagnosis remains notably missing from many standard dermatology textbooks and online dermatology resources, making it a potentially overlooked clinical entity.^4-6 The tongue has a number of normal variations that are unlikely to be fully appreciated or acknowledged by dermatologists on routine physical examination but may cause distress to patients and raise concerns from primary care providers. Given that PFPT are benign, physicians should be aware of this diagnosis so as to provide reassurance to patients and avoid unnecessary testing. However, because the tongue can represent a harbinger of systemic disease, the differential diagnosis for the hyperpigmented lesions must always be considered, including Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, hemochromatosis, Addison disease, and Laugier-Hunziker syndrome (a rarer condition causing pigmented lesions on the lips, palate, and tongue), particularly if the hyperpigmented lesions extend beyond the fungiform papillae and do not fit into the 3 categories of PFPT.⁹

To the Editor:

The tongue is composed of 4 different types of papillae: fungiform, foliate, circumvallate, and filiform. Fungiform papillae, primarily located on the tip and sides of the tongue, are mushroom-shaped epithelial elevations composed of taste buds at the upper surface overlying a core of connective tissue.¹ Foliate and circumvallate papillae are likewise associated with taste buds, while the filiform papillae are hypothesized to exclusively provide a frictional surface for proper food manipulation. Pigmented fungiform papillae of the tongue (PFPT) was first reported by Leonard² in 1905, who described discrete hyperpigmentation present only on the surface of fungiform papillae, mainly in black patients. Although they have been primarily described in black individuals, PFPT also has been occasionally reported in Asian and Middle Eastern individuals as well as Indian women.^3-6

A 36-year-old Indian man initially presented to his primary care provider with brown discoloration of the dorsolateral aspects of the tongue that had been present since childhood. His primary care provider was concerned about a potential syndrome or systemic illness and referred the patient to dermatology for further evaluation. The patient denied any oral mucosal bleeding or discomfort, and a review of systems was unremarkable. His medical and family history were otherwise noncontributory, and he denied a history of tobacco use.

Physical examination of the tongue and oral mucosa revealed numerous 0.5- to 1.0-mm brown papillae in a symmetric distribution, primarily located on the tip and lateral aspects of the tongue (Figure). No hyperpigmentation was present on the posterior aspect of the tongue or on any other mucosal surface. Routine laboratory values were notable for mild elevations in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase (47 U/L [reference range, 10–30 U/L] and 64 U/L [reference range, 10–40 U/L], respectively) and mild hyperbilirubinemia (total bilirubin, 1.8 mg/dL [reference range, 0.3–1.2 mg/dL]). A complete blood cell count and electrolytes were within reference range. Based on the clinical appearance of the lesions and their presence since childhood, the patient was diagnosed with PFPT. No intervention was undertaken, and the patient was reassured of the benign nature of the lesions.

Pigmented fungiform papillae of the tongue presents in 3 variants. The first variant involves hyperpigmentation of all fungiform papillae located on the lateral and frontal aspects of the tongue and is the most common manifestation of PFPT.³ Our patient falls into this category. The second and third variants involve the dorsal surface, with the former involving only a few fungiform papillae on the dorsal aspect of the tongue and the latter variant involving all papillae.³ In 1974, Holzwanger et al³ conducted a survey of 300 random individuals, finding that 30% of black women and 25% of black men had some hyperpigmentation of the tongue, while only 1 white individual demonstrated lingual pigmentation. The physiology of PFPT remains largely unknown. Dermoscopic evaluation often demonstrates elevations with pigmented borders in a rose petal shape.⁷ Histopathologic evaluation reveals melanophages without inflammation that are positive for melanin on Fontana-Masson silver staining but negative for iron on Prussian blue staining.⁸

Despite the fact that PFPT is not a rare condition, the diagnosis remains notably missing from many standard dermatology textbooks and online dermatology resources, making it a potentially overlooked clinical entity.^4-6 The tongue has a number of normal variations that are unlikely to be fully appreciated or acknowledged by dermatologists on routine physical examination but may cause distress to patients and raise concerns from primary care providers. Given that PFPT are benign, physicians should be aware of this diagnosis so as to provide reassurance to patients and avoid unnecessary testing. However, because the tongue can represent a harbinger of systemic disease, the differential diagnosis for the hyperpigmented lesions must always be considered, including Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, hemochromatosis, Addison disease, and Laugier-Hunziker syndrome (a rarer condition causing pigmented lesions on the lips, palate, and tongue), particularly if the hyperpigmented lesions extend beyond the fungiform papillae and do not fit into the 3 categories of PFPT.⁹

To the Editor:

The tongue is composed of 4 different types of papillae: fungiform, foliate, circumvallate, and filiform. Fungiform papillae, primarily located on the tip and sides of the tongue, are mushroom-shaped epithelial elevations composed of taste buds at the upper surface overlying a core of connective tissue.¹ Foliate and circumvallate papillae are likewise associated with taste buds, while the filiform papillae are hypothesized to exclusively provide a frictional surface for proper food manipulation. Pigmented fungiform papillae of the tongue (PFPT) was first reported by Leonard² in 1905, who described discrete hyperpigmentation present only on the surface of fungiform papillae, mainly in black patients. Although they have been primarily described in black individuals, PFPT also has been occasionally reported in Asian and Middle Eastern individuals as well as Indian women.^3-6

A 36-year-old Indian man initially presented to his primary care provider with brown discoloration of the dorsolateral aspects of the tongue that had been present since childhood. His primary care provider was concerned about a potential syndrome or systemic illness and referred the patient to dermatology for further evaluation. The patient denied any oral mucosal bleeding or discomfort, and a review of systems was unremarkable. His medical and family history were otherwise noncontributory, and he denied a history of tobacco use.

Physical examination of the tongue and oral mucosa revealed numerous 0.5- to 1.0-mm brown papillae in a symmetric distribution, primarily located on the tip and lateral aspects of the tongue (Figure). No hyperpigmentation was present on the posterior aspect of the tongue or on any other mucosal surface. Routine laboratory values were notable for mild elevations in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase (47 U/L [reference range, 10–30 U/L] and 64 U/L [reference range, 10–40 U/L], respectively) and mild hyperbilirubinemia (total bilirubin, 1.8 mg/dL [reference range, 0.3–1.2 mg/dL]). A complete blood cell count and electrolytes were within reference range. Based on the clinical appearance of the lesions and their presence since childhood, the patient was diagnosed with PFPT. No intervention was undertaken, and the patient was reassured of the benign nature of the lesions.

Pigmented fungiform papillae of the tongue presents in 3 variants. The first variant involves hyperpigmentation of all fungiform papillae located on the lateral and frontal aspects of the tongue and is the most common manifestation of PFPT.³ Our patient falls into this category. The second and third variants involve the dorsal surface, with the former involving only a few fungiform papillae on the dorsal aspect of the tongue and the latter variant involving all papillae.³ In 1974, Holzwanger et al³ conducted a survey of 300 random individuals, finding that 30% of black women and 25% of black men had some hyperpigmentation of the tongue, while only 1 white individual demonstrated lingual pigmentation. The physiology of PFPT remains largely unknown. Dermoscopic evaluation often demonstrates elevations with pigmented borders in a rose petal shape.⁷ Histopathologic evaluation reveals melanophages without inflammation that are positive for melanin on Fontana-Masson silver staining but negative for iron on Prussian blue staining.⁸

Despite the fact that PFPT is not a rare condition, the diagnosis remains notably missing from many standard dermatology textbooks and online dermatology resources, making it a potentially overlooked clinical entity.^4-6 The tongue has a number of normal variations that are unlikely to be fully appreciated or acknowledged by dermatologists on routine physical examination but may cause distress to patients and raise concerns from primary care providers. Given that PFPT are benign, physicians should be aware of this diagnosis so as to provide reassurance to patients and avoid unnecessary testing. However, because the tongue can represent a harbinger of systemic disease, the differential diagnosis for the hyperpigmented lesions must always be considered, including Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, hemochromatosis, Addison disease, and Laugier-Hunziker syndrome (a rarer condition causing pigmented lesions on the lips, palate, and tongue), particularly if the hyperpigmented lesions extend beyond the fungiform papillae and do not fit into the 3 categories of PFPT.⁹

Although the American Academy of Pediatrics had cited a preference for injected flu vaccines for children during the 2018-2019 flu season, this year’s recommendations say either that or the nasal spray formulation are acceptable, according to a press release. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has given similar guidance.

Louise A. Koenig/MDedge News

Because the spray did not work as well against A/H1N1 as the injected vaccine had during the 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 seasons, the AAP did not recommend the spray during the 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 seasons. However, in 2017 the spray’s manufacturer included a new strain of A/H1N1, and new data has supported the spray’s effectiveness against some strains.

The AAP recommends all children aged 6 months and older should be vaccinated, but the flu nasal spray is approved only for nonpregnant patients aged 2-49 years, according to the CDC. That said, the spray is especially appropriate for patients who refuse to receive the injected form, so the choice of formulation is at the pediatrician’s discretion, according to the AAP release.

[email protected]

Although the American Academy of Pediatrics had cited a preference for injected flu vaccines for children during the 2018-2019 flu season, this year’s recommendations say either that or the nasal spray formulation are acceptable, according to a press release. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has given similar guidance.

Louise A. Koenig/MDedge News

Because the spray did not work as well against A/H1N1 as the injected vaccine had during the 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 seasons, the AAP did not recommend the spray during the 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 seasons. However, in 2017 the spray’s manufacturer included a new strain of A/H1N1, and new data has supported the spray’s effectiveness against some strains.

The AAP recommends all children aged 6 months and older should be vaccinated, but the flu nasal spray is approved only for nonpregnant patients aged 2-49 years, according to the CDC. That said, the spray is especially appropriate for patients who refuse to receive the injected form, so the choice of formulation is at the pediatrician’s discretion, according to the AAP release.

[email protected]

Although the American Academy of Pediatrics had cited a preference for injected flu vaccines for children during the 2018-2019 flu season, this year’s recommendations say either that or the nasal spray formulation are acceptable, according to a press release. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has given similar guidance.

Louise A. Koenig/MDedge News

Because the spray did not work as well against A/H1N1 as the injected vaccine had during the 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 seasons, the AAP did not recommend the spray during the 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 seasons. However, in 2017 the spray’s manufacturer included a new strain of A/H1N1, and new data has supported the spray’s effectiveness against some strains.

The AAP recommends all children aged 6 months and older should be vaccinated, but the flu nasal spray is approved only for nonpregnant patients aged 2-49 years, according to the CDC. That said, the spray is especially appropriate for patients who refuse to receive the injected form, so the choice of formulation is at the pediatrician’s discretion, according to the AAP release.

[email protected]

DALLAS – A multicenter, prospective study is underway to determine if the central vein sign can be incorporated into existing multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria.

At the meeting held by the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, Daniel Ontaneda, MD, said that up to 20% of individuals referred for a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) are incorrectly diagnosed with the disease, and about two-thirds of misdiagnosed patients are exposed to unnecessary and sometimes life-threatening risks associated with disease-modifying therapies. “MRI is a sensitive tool for diagnosis of MS and is an integral component of the diagnostic criteria for MS,” said Dr. Ontaneda, a neurologist at the Cleveland Clinic Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research. “However, there are problems with its implementation. Approximately half of individuals referred to an MS clinic present with atypical symptoms [fatigue, cognitive disturbance, pain] and not typical syndromes [unilateral optic neuritis, brain stem syndromes, partial myelitis]. Increasing diagnostic sensitivity may have come at the price of decreased specificity. MRI criteria have a specificity of 32% for dissemination in space and 42% for dissemination in time.”

While misdiagnosis appears to be mainly caused by overinterpretation of abnormal MRI findings, the central vein sign (CVS) is an effective method to overcome such challenges. Recent studies have demonstrated that CVS may help to identify MS, as 85% of white matter lesions in MS have a central vein, compared with only 8% of small vessel ischemic disease, 34% of migraine, and 14% of other inflammatory or autoimmune diseases.

“We think there is a significant and unmet need for more specific and accurate diagnostic tests to facilitate early confirmation of a diagnosis of MS,” Dr. Ontaneda said. “We propose a prospective evaluation of the central vein sign, which we hypothesize will reduce misdiagnosis, hasten early diagnosis, and simplify clinical decision making.”


With funding from the Race to Erase MS Foundation, he and his associates have designed CAVS-MS (Central Vein Sign in MS), a multicenter, prospective, observational trial being conducted at 10 sites. The first phase of the study is a cross-sectional pilot at the 10 sites. The primary objective is to establish the contrast-to-noise ratio of lesion to normal-appearing white matter and central vein to lesion across the 10 sites using 3-tesla FLAIR imaging in subjects with a clinical or radiologic suspicion of MS. The secondary objectives are to investigate the difference in contrast-to-noise ratio identified in the primary objective between pre- and postcontrast FLAIR imaging to identify whether gadolinium injection improves central vein detection, to determine the reproducibility of different methods for detection of positive CVS across sites, and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the different methods for the diagnosis of MS, compared with the McDonald 2010 MS criteria.

The study population will consist of 100 individuals referred to an MS center based on clinical or radiologic suspicion of MS; 30 participants are currently enrolled. The 10 sites include the Cleveland Clinic; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; the University of California, San Francisco; the University of Texas, Houston; the University of Toronto; the University of Vermont, Burlington; the University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles; Yale University, New Haven, Conn.; and the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

CAVS-MS includes development of a software platform for rating of central veins through an imaging software partner, QMENTA. “We are going to have the individual clinicians at each site rate the lesions, so we will have information from 10 different raters,” Dr. Ontaneda said. The study will be coordinated at the Cleveland Clinic, central image analysis will be conducted at the National Institutes of Health, and statistical analysis will be performed at the University of Pennsylvania.

The researchers also hope to perform a prospective study with three objectives. The first is to determine if incorporation of CVS for the diagnosis of MS improves diagnostic accuracy and hastens diagnosis in individuals presenting with typical first clinical events. The second objective “is to determine if incorporation of CVS for the diagnosis of MS improves specificity among individuals presenting with atypical syndromes,” Dr. Ontaneda said. “The third aim is to look at central vein volume as a predictor of clinical/MRI disease activity associated with disability in MS.”

He concluded his remarks by describing the CVS as “a tool that offers promise both for increasing specificity and perhaps enabling earlier diagnosis of MS. Studies will determine if the central vein sign can be incorporated into the diagnostic criteria. The NIH is working with MRI manufacturers to make sequences available for disseminated clinical use.”

Dr. Ontaneda reported that he has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health, the Race to Erase MS Foundation, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Genentech, Genzyme, and Novartis. He has also received consulting fees from Biogen, Genentech, and Novartis.

[email protected]

DALLAS – A multicenter, prospective study is underway to determine if the central vein sign can be incorporated into existing multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria.

At the meeting held by the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, Daniel Ontaneda, MD, said that up to 20% of individuals referred for a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) are incorrectly diagnosed with the disease, and about two-thirds of misdiagnosed patients are exposed to unnecessary and sometimes life-threatening risks associated with disease-modifying therapies. “MRI is a sensitive tool for diagnosis of MS and is an integral component of the diagnostic criteria for MS,” said Dr. Ontaneda, a neurologist at the Cleveland Clinic Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research. “However, there are problems with its implementation. Approximately half of individuals referred to an MS clinic present with atypical symptoms [fatigue, cognitive disturbance, pain] and not typical syndromes [unilateral optic neuritis, brain stem syndromes, partial myelitis]. Increasing diagnostic sensitivity may have come at the price of decreased specificity. MRI criteria have a specificity of 32% for dissemination in space and 42% for dissemination in time.”

While misdiagnosis appears to be mainly caused by overinterpretation of abnormal MRI findings, the central vein sign (CVS) is an effective method to overcome such challenges. Recent studies have demonstrated that CVS may help to identify MS, as 85% of white matter lesions in MS have a central vein, compared with only 8% of small vessel ischemic disease, 34% of migraine, and 14% of other inflammatory or autoimmune diseases.

“We think there is a significant and unmet need for more specific and accurate diagnostic tests to facilitate early confirmation of a diagnosis of MS,” Dr. Ontaneda said. “We propose a prospective evaluation of the central vein sign, which we hypothesize will reduce misdiagnosis, hasten early diagnosis, and simplify clinical decision making.”


With funding from the Race to Erase MS Foundation, he and his associates have designed CAVS-MS (Central Vein Sign in MS), a multicenter, prospective, observational trial being conducted at 10 sites. The first phase of the study is a cross-sectional pilot at the 10 sites. The primary objective is to establish the contrast-to-noise ratio of lesion to normal-appearing white matter and central vein to lesion across the 10 sites using 3-tesla FLAIR imaging in subjects with a clinical or radiologic suspicion of MS. The secondary objectives are to investigate the difference in contrast-to-noise ratio identified in the primary objective between pre- and postcontrast FLAIR imaging to identify whether gadolinium injection improves central vein detection, to determine the reproducibility of different methods for detection of positive CVS across sites, and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the different methods for the diagnosis of MS, compared with the McDonald 2010 MS criteria.

The study population will consist of 100 individuals referred to an MS center based on clinical or radiologic suspicion of MS; 30 participants are currently enrolled. The 10 sites include the Cleveland Clinic; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; the University of California, San Francisco; the University of Texas, Houston; the University of Toronto; the University of Vermont, Burlington; the University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles; Yale University, New Haven, Conn.; and the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

CAVS-MS includes development of a software platform for rating of central veins through an imaging software partner, QMENTA. “We are going to have the individual clinicians at each site rate the lesions, so we will have information from 10 different raters,” Dr. Ontaneda said. The study will be coordinated at the Cleveland Clinic, central image analysis will be conducted at the National Institutes of Health, and statistical analysis will be performed at the University of Pennsylvania.

The researchers also hope to perform a prospective study with three objectives. The first is to determine if incorporation of CVS for the diagnosis of MS improves diagnostic accuracy and hastens diagnosis in individuals presenting with typical first clinical events. The second objective “is to determine if incorporation of CVS for the diagnosis of MS improves specificity among individuals presenting with atypical syndromes,” Dr. Ontaneda said. “The third aim is to look at central vein volume as a predictor of clinical/MRI disease activity associated with disability in MS.”

He concluded his remarks by describing the CVS as “a tool that offers promise both for increasing specificity and perhaps enabling earlier diagnosis of MS. Studies will determine if the central vein sign can be incorporated into the diagnostic criteria. The NIH is working with MRI manufacturers to make sequences available for disseminated clinical use.”

Dr. Ontaneda reported that he has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health, the Race to Erase MS Foundation, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Genentech, Genzyme, and Novartis. He has also received consulting fees from Biogen, Genentech, and Novartis.

[email protected]

DALLAS – A multicenter, prospective study is underway to determine if the central vein sign can be incorporated into existing multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria.

At the meeting held by the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, Daniel Ontaneda, MD, said that up to 20% of individuals referred for a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) are incorrectly diagnosed with the disease, and about two-thirds of misdiagnosed patients are exposed to unnecessary and sometimes life-threatening risks associated with disease-modifying therapies. “MRI is a sensitive tool for diagnosis of MS and is an integral component of the diagnostic criteria for MS,” said Dr. Ontaneda, a neurologist at the Cleveland Clinic Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research. “However, there are problems with its implementation. Approximately half of individuals referred to an MS clinic present with atypical symptoms [fatigue, cognitive disturbance, pain] and not typical syndromes [unilateral optic neuritis, brain stem syndromes, partial myelitis]. Increasing diagnostic sensitivity may have come at the price of decreased specificity. MRI criteria have a specificity of 32% for dissemination in space and 42% for dissemination in time.”

While misdiagnosis appears to be mainly caused by overinterpretation of abnormal MRI findings, the central vein sign (CVS) is an effective method to overcome such challenges. Recent studies have demonstrated that CVS may help to identify MS, as 85% of white matter lesions in MS have a central vein, compared with only 8% of small vessel ischemic disease, 34% of migraine, and 14% of other inflammatory or autoimmune diseases.

“We think there is a significant and unmet need for more specific and accurate diagnostic tests to facilitate early confirmation of a diagnosis of MS,” Dr. Ontaneda said. “We propose a prospective evaluation of the central vein sign, which we hypothesize will reduce misdiagnosis, hasten early diagnosis, and simplify clinical decision making.”


With funding from the Race to Erase MS Foundation, he and his associates have designed CAVS-MS (Central Vein Sign in MS), a multicenter, prospective, observational trial being conducted at 10 sites. The first phase of the study is a cross-sectional pilot at the 10 sites. The primary objective is to establish the contrast-to-noise ratio of lesion to normal-appearing white matter and central vein to lesion across the 10 sites using 3-tesla FLAIR imaging in subjects with a clinical or radiologic suspicion of MS. The secondary objectives are to investigate the difference in contrast-to-noise ratio identified in the primary objective between pre- and postcontrast FLAIR imaging to identify whether gadolinium injection improves central vein detection, to determine the reproducibility of different methods for detection of positive CVS across sites, and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the different methods for the diagnosis of MS, compared with the McDonald 2010 MS criteria.

The study population will consist of 100 individuals referred to an MS center based on clinical or radiologic suspicion of MS; 30 participants are currently enrolled. The 10 sites include the Cleveland Clinic; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; the University of California, San Francisco; the University of Texas, Houston; the University of Toronto; the University of Vermont, Burlington; the University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles; Yale University, New Haven, Conn.; and the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

CAVS-MS includes development of a software platform for rating of central veins through an imaging software partner, QMENTA. “We are going to have the individual clinicians at each site rate the lesions, so we will have information from 10 different raters,” Dr. Ontaneda said. The study will be coordinated at the Cleveland Clinic, central image analysis will be conducted at the National Institutes of Health, and statistical analysis will be performed at the University of Pennsylvania.

The researchers also hope to perform a prospective study with three objectives. The first is to determine if incorporation of CVS for the diagnosis of MS improves diagnostic accuracy and hastens diagnosis in individuals presenting with typical first clinical events. The second objective “is to determine if incorporation of CVS for the diagnosis of MS improves specificity among individuals presenting with atypical syndromes,” Dr. Ontaneda said. “The third aim is to look at central vein volume as a predictor of clinical/MRI disease activity associated with disability in MS.”

He concluded his remarks by describing the CVS as “a tool that offers promise both for increasing specificity and perhaps enabling earlier diagnosis of MS. Studies will determine if the central vein sign can be incorporated into the diagnostic criteria. The NIH is working with MRI manufacturers to make sequences available for disseminated clinical use.”

Dr. Ontaneda reported that he has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health, the Race to Erase MS Foundation, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Genentech, Genzyme, and Novartis. He has also received consulting fees from Biogen, Genentech, and Novartis.

[email protected]

Most people who could benefit from FDA-approved medications for opioid use disorder do not receive them, and access to those treatments is not equitable, according to a new consensus study report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

“Methadone, buprenorphine, and extended-release naltrexone are safe and highly effective medications that are already approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to treat OUD,” the report said. “These medications save lives, but the majority of people with OUD in the United States receive no treatment at all.”

The report, called “Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Save Lives,” said a critical factor in addressing the crisis is “confronting the major barriers” to using those medications. It also said additional research will be needed to address opioid use disorder among subpopulations in the United States, such as adolescents, older adults, people with comorbidities, racial and ethnic groups, and people with low socioeconomic status. The National Academies’ report was sponsored by NIDA and SAMHSA.

A few weeks before the release of National Academies report, the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) held a webinar providing details on its Action Collaborative on Countering the U.S. Opioid Epidemic. The collaborative, a partnership of public and private stakeholders, aims to address the opioid crisis through a multidisciplinary, cross-sector effort.

The collaborative is represented by federal agencies, state and local governments, health care systems, provider groups, nonprofits, payers, industry, academia, patient organizations, and communities across about 55 organizations, according to Victor J. Dzau, MD, chair of the Action Collaborative and current NAM president. Over a 2-year period, the collaborative’s goal is to accelerate progress in overcoming the opioid crisis by recognizing the challenges, research gaps, and needs of organizations involved in the crisis and “elevate and accelerate evidence-based, multisectoral, and interprofessional solutions,” he said.

“This is not a problem that can be solved by a single sector. It is truly a whole of society problem,” said Adm. Brett P. Giroir, MD, assistant secretary for health at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, said during the webinar. “And the only way that we are going to be able to begin making inroads to reverse the trends of this crisis is if we work together.” Dr. Giroir also serves as cochair of the steering committee for the collaborative.

In its overview of the collaborative, the NAM outlined four working groups developed through a series of surveys and planning meetings that would identify the resources that currently exist to combat the opioid epidemic and determine which resources still need to be developed. In the Health Professional Education and Training Working Group, for example, the objective is to examine what is being taught to health professionals about acute and chronic pain management at an accreditation, certification, and regulatory level to develop educational tools based around knowledge gaps in those areas and analyze how the new resources are affecting health professions after they have been adopted, said Steve Singer, PhD, vice president of education and outreach at the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and colead of the working group.“Our goal is really to provide guidance and resources across the continuum of health professions and education with an interprofessional – and patient-informed view,” he said.

The Opioid Prescribing Guidelines and Evidence Standards Working Group plans to address the disparities in prescribing and tapering guidelines for acute and chronic pain as well as identify where pain management guidelines in different specialties “cannot be justified,” based on available evidence.

“Further, we think it’s really important to not just have guidelines that will sit on a shelf, but we also want to think about how we can support implementation of these guidelines into practice ... ” said Helen Burstin, MD, MPH, executive vice president and CEO for the Council of Medical Specialty Societies and colead of the working group.

Alonzo L. Plough, PhD, MPH, vice president of research-evaluation-learning at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and colead of the Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery Services Working Group, explained that the goal of his group is to identify the “essential elements and components” and best practices of prevention, treatment, and recovery for OUD. He noted that, although the working group will not be able to reach all patient populations affected by OUD, it has discussed targeting vulnerable high-risk populations, such as those involved in the criminal justice system, homeless veterans, mothers, and children.

“This is an ecosystem that requires great concentration and effort to make sure that there are integrated approaches throughout the continuum that work for patients and clients from different walks of life, and I think that our overall guidance is how we can recognize and use evidence to find those approaches and build on them for guidance,” he said.

The Research, Data, and Metrics Needs Working Group is tasked with collaborating with the other groups to obtain currently available information and identify what barriers exist to greater transparency, sharing and interoperability of data as well as what gaps in research currently exist that would further the collaborative’s mission, said Kelly J. Clark, MD, MBA, of the ASAM. “It is simply critical for us to utilize the data that’s out there, to pool it into more actionable information – and then to act on it,” Dr. Clark said.

The NAM is seeking new organizations interested in joining the collaborative as a network organization, which would receive updates and provide input on the collaborative but would not be a part of the working groups.

The first public meeting of the Action Collaborative on Countering the U.S. Opioid Epidemic will take place on April 30, 2019, in Washington.

Most people who could benefit from FDA-approved medications for opioid use disorder do not receive them, and access to those treatments is not equitable, according to a new consensus study report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

“Methadone, buprenorphine, and extended-release naltrexone are safe and highly effective medications that are already approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to treat OUD,” the report said. “These medications save lives, but the majority of people with OUD in the United States receive no treatment at all.”

The report, called “Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Save Lives,” said a critical factor in addressing the crisis is “confronting the major barriers” to using those medications. It also said additional research will be needed to address opioid use disorder among subpopulations in the United States, such as adolescents, older adults, people with comorbidities, racial and ethnic groups, and people with low socioeconomic status. The National Academies’ report was sponsored by NIDA and SAMHSA.

A few weeks before the release of National Academies report, the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) held a webinar providing details on its Action Collaborative on Countering the U.S. Opioid Epidemic. The collaborative, a partnership of public and private stakeholders, aims to address the opioid crisis through a multidisciplinary, cross-sector effort.

The collaborative is represented by federal agencies, state and local governments, health care systems, provider groups, nonprofits, payers, industry, academia, patient organizations, and communities across about 55 organizations, according to Victor J. Dzau, MD, chair of the Action Collaborative and current NAM president. Over a 2-year period, the collaborative’s goal is to accelerate progress in overcoming the opioid crisis by recognizing the challenges, research gaps, and needs of organizations involved in the crisis and “elevate and accelerate evidence-based, multisectoral, and interprofessional solutions,” he said.

“This is not a problem that can be solved by a single sector. It is truly a whole of society problem,” said Adm. Brett P. Giroir, MD, assistant secretary for health at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, said during the webinar. “And the only way that we are going to be able to begin making inroads to reverse the trends of this crisis is if we work together.” Dr. Giroir also serves as cochair of the steering committee for the collaborative.

In its overview of the collaborative, the NAM outlined four working groups developed through a series of surveys and planning meetings that would identify the resources that currently exist to combat the opioid epidemic and determine which resources still need to be developed. In the Health Professional Education and Training Working Group, for example, the objective is to examine what is being taught to health professionals about acute and chronic pain management at an accreditation, certification, and regulatory level to develop educational tools based around knowledge gaps in those areas and analyze how the new resources are affecting health professions after they have been adopted, said Steve Singer, PhD, vice president of education and outreach at the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and colead of the working group.“Our goal is really to provide guidance and resources across the continuum of health professions and education with an interprofessional – and patient-informed view,” he said.

The Opioid Prescribing Guidelines and Evidence Standards Working Group plans to address the disparities in prescribing and tapering guidelines for acute and chronic pain as well as identify where pain management guidelines in different specialties “cannot be justified,” based on available evidence.

“Further, we think it’s really important to not just have guidelines that will sit on a shelf, but we also want to think about how we can support implementation of these guidelines into practice ... ” said Helen Burstin, MD, MPH, executive vice president and CEO for the Council of Medical Specialty Societies and colead of the working group.

Alonzo L. Plough, PhD, MPH, vice president of research-evaluation-learning at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and colead of the Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery Services Working Group, explained that the goal of his group is to identify the “essential elements and components” and best practices of prevention, treatment, and recovery for OUD. He noted that, although the working group will not be able to reach all patient populations affected by OUD, it has discussed targeting vulnerable high-risk populations, such as those involved in the criminal justice system, homeless veterans, mothers, and children.

“This is an ecosystem that requires great concentration and effort to make sure that there are integrated approaches throughout the continuum that work for patients and clients from different walks of life, and I think that our overall guidance is how we can recognize and use evidence to find those approaches and build on them for guidance,” he said.

The Research, Data, and Metrics Needs Working Group is tasked with collaborating with the other groups to obtain currently available information and identify what barriers exist to greater transparency, sharing and interoperability of data as well as what gaps in research currently exist that would further the collaborative’s mission, said Kelly J. Clark, MD, MBA, of the ASAM. “It is simply critical for us to utilize the data that’s out there, to pool it into more actionable information – and then to act on it,” Dr. Clark said.

The NAM is seeking new organizations interested in joining the collaborative as a network organization, which would receive updates and provide input on the collaborative but would not be a part of the working groups.

The first public meeting of the Action Collaborative on Countering the U.S. Opioid Epidemic will take place on April 30, 2019, in Washington.

Most people who could benefit from FDA-approved medications for opioid use disorder do not receive them, and access to those treatments is not equitable, according to a new consensus study report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

“Methadone, buprenorphine, and extended-release naltrexone are safe and highly effective medications that are already approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to treat OUD,” the report said. “These medications save lives, but the majority of people with OUD in the United States receive no treatment at all.”

The report, called “Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Save Lives,” said a critical factor in addressing the crisis is “confronting the major barriers” to using those medications. It also said additional research will be needed to address opioid use disorder among subpopulations in the United States, such as adolescents, older adults, people with comorbidities, racial and ethnic groups, and people with low socioeconomic status. The National Academies’ report was sponsored by NIDA and SAMHSA.

A few weeks before the release of National Academies report, the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) held a webinar providing details on its Action Collaborative on Countering the U.S. Opioid Epidemic. The collaborative, a partnership of public and private stakeholders, aims to address the opioid crisis through a multidisciplinary, cross-sector effort.

The collaborative is represented by federal agencies, state and local governments, health care systems, provider groups, nonprofits, payers, industry, academia, patient organizations, and communities across about 55 organizations, according to Victor J. Dzau, MD, chair of the Action Collaborative and current NAM president. Over a 2-year period, the collaborative’s goal is to accelerate progress in overcoming the opioid crisis by recognizing the challenges, research gaps, and needs of organizations involved in the crisis and “elevate and accelerate evidence-based, multisectoral, and interprofessional solutions,” he said.

“This is not a problem that can be solved by a single sector. It is truly a whole of society problem,” said Adm. Brett P. Giroir, MD, assistant secretary for health at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, said during the webinar. “And the only way that we are going to be able to begin making inroads to reverse the trends of this crisis is if we work together.” Dr. Giroir also serves as cochair of the steering committee for the collaborative.

In its overview of the collaborative, the NAM outlined four working groups developed through a series of surveys and planning meetings that would identify the resources that currently exist to combat the opioid epidemic and determine which resources still need to be developed. In the Health Professional Education and Training Working Group, for example, the objective is to examine what is being taught to health professionals about acute and chronic pain management at an accreditation, certification, and regulatory level to develop educational tools based around knowledge gaps in those areas and analyze how the new resources are affecting health professions after they have been adopted, said Steve Singer, PhD, vice president of education and outreach at the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and colead of the working group.“Our goal is really to provide guidance and resources across the continuum of health professions and education with an interprofessional – and patient-informed view,” he said.

The Opioid Prescribing Guidelines and Evidence Standards Working Group plans to address the disparities in prescribing and tapering guidelines for acute and chronic pain as well as identify where pain management guidelines in different specialties “cannot be justified,” based on available evidence.

“Further, we think it’s really important to not just have guidelines that will sit on a shelf, but we also want to think about how we can support implementation of these guidelines into practice ... ” said Helen Burstin, MD, MPH, executive vice president and CEO for the Council of Medical Specialty Societies and colead of the working group.

Alonzo L. Plough, PhD, MPH, vice president of research-evaluation-learning at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and colead of the Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery Services Working Group, explained that the goal of his group is to identify the “essential elements and components” and best practices of prevention, treatment, and recovery for OUD. He noted that, although the working group will not be able to reach all patient populations affected by OUD, it has discussed targeting vulnerable high-risk populations, such as those involved in the criminal justice system, homeless veterans, mothers, and children.

“This is an ecosystem that requires great concentration and effort to make sure that there are integrated approaches throughout the continuum that work for patients and clients from different walks of life, and I think that our overall guidance is how we can recognize and use evidence to find those approaches and build on them for guidance,” he said.

The Research, Data, and Metrics Needs Working Group is tasked with collaborating with the other groups to obtain currently available information and identify what barriers exist to greater transparency, sharing and interoperability of data as well as what gaps in research currently exist that would further the collaborative’s mission, said Kelly J. Clark, MD, MBA, of the ASAM. “It is simply critical for us to utilize the data that’s out there, to pool it into more actionable information – and then to act on it,” Dr. Clark said.

The NAM is seeking new organizations interested in joining the collaborative as a network organization, which would receive updates and provide input on the collaborative but would not be a part of the working groups.

The first public meeting of the Action Collaborative on Countering the U.S. Opioid Epidemic will take place on April 30, 2019, in Washington.

LAS VEGAS – Communicate with your pharmacists to keep nurse phone calls and empty medication-dispensing devices at bay. Watch out for overlapping medication orders. Beware of gabapentin mishaps, and embrace Tylenol – but not always.

Randy Dotinga/MDedge News

April Smith, PharmD, associate professor of pharmacy practice at Creighton University, Omaha, offered these tips about postoperative care to surgeons at the 2019 Annual Minimally Invasive Surgery Symposium by Global Academy for Medical Education.

“We’re probably one of the most underutilized professions you have on your team,” she said, adding that “we have to know what you’re doing to help you.”

As she explained, “if you’re going to have a new order set, let us know that, so we can be your allies in helping nurses and other people understand why we’re doing what we’re doing. I’m on the same floor, and the nurses are coming up to me and asking me questions. If I can explain to them why we’re doing these things, they’ll get on board a lot faster and save you a lot of phone calls. I know you’re surgeons and you hate that [phone calls].”

Better communication with pharmacists can also boost the stocking of enhanced-recovery medications in automatic dispensing machines, she said, so they’re ready when patients need them.

Dr. Smith offered these tips about specific postsurgery medications:

• Scopolamine is a “great drug for post-op vomiting and nausea,” Dr. Smith said. But do not use it in patients over 65, and it’s contraindicated in glaucoma. Beware of these notable side effects: Blurry vision, constipation, and urinary retention. Dexamethasone and ondansetron can be used as an alternative, she said.
• Use of the blood thinner enoxaparin after discharge may become more common as surgical stays become shorter, Dr. Smith said. She urged surgeons to keep its cost in mind: a 10-day course can be as little as $2 with Medicaid or as much as $140 (a cash price for patients without coverage).
• Make sure to adjust medications based on preoperative or intraoperative doses, she said, to avoid endangering patients by inadvertently doubling up on doses. And watch out for previous use of gabapentin, which is part of enhanced-recovery protocols. Patients who take the drug at home should be put back on their typical dose.
• Also, she warned, “don’t give gabapentin to someone who’s never had it before plus an opioid.” This, she said, can cause delirium.
• Consider starting liquids the night of surgery so patients can begin taking their home medications such as sleep, chronic pain, and psychiatric drugs. Patients will be more stable and satisfied, Dr. Smith said.
• Don’t prescribe hard-to-find medications like oxycodone oral solution or oral ketorolac. These drugs will send patients from pharmacy to pharmacy in search of them, Dr. Smith said.
• Embrace a “Meds to Beds” program if possible. These programs enlist on-site pharmacies to deliver medications to bedside for patients to take home.
• Consider Tylenol as a postoperative painkiller with scheduled doses and be aware that you can prescribe the over-the-counter adult liquid form. However, Dr. Smith cautioned that Tylenol is “not great” on an as-needed basis. Gabapentin and celecoxib (unless contraindicated) are also helpful for postop pain relief, and they’re inexpensive, she said. Three to five days should be enough in most minimally invasive surgeries.
• Don’t overprescribe opioids. “The more we prescribe, the more they will consume,” Dr. Smith said. Check the American College of Surgeons guidelines regarding the ideal number of postsurgery, 5-mg doses of oxycodone to prescribe to opioid-naive patients at discharge. No more than 10 or 15 pills are recommended for several types of general surgery (J Amer Coll Surg. 2018;227:411-8).

Global Academy for Medical Education and this news organization are owned by the same parent company. Dr. Smith reports no relevant disclosures.

LAS VEGAS – Communicate with your pharmacists to keep nurse phone calls and empty medication-dispensing devices at bay. Watch out for overlapping medication orders. Beware of gabapentin mishaps, and embrace Tylenol – but not always.

Randy Dotinga/MDedge News

April Smith, PharmD, associate professor of pharmacy practice at Creighton University, Omaha, offered these tips about postoperative care to surgeons at the 2019 Annual Minimally Invasive Surgery Symposium by Global Academy for Medical Education.

“We’re probably one of the most underutilized professions you have on your team,” she said, adding that “we have to know what you’re doing to help you.”

As she explained, “if you’re going to have a new order set, let us know that, so we can be your allies in helping nurses and other people understand why we’re doing what we’re doing. I’m on the same floor, and the nurses are coming up to me and asking me questions. If I can explain to them why we’re doing these things, they’ll get on board a lot faster and save you a lot of phone calls. I know you’re surgeons and you hate that [phone calls].”

Better communication with pharmacists can also boost the stocking of enhanced-recovery medications in automatic dispensing machines, she said, so they’re ready when patients need them.

Dr. Smith offered these tips about specific postsurgery medications:

• Scopolamine is a “great drug for post-op vomiting and nausea,” Dr. Smith said. But do not use it in patients over 65, and it’s contraindicated in glaucoma. Beware of these notable side effects: Blurry vision, constipation, and urinary retention. Dexamethasone and ondansetron can be used as an alternative, she said.
• Use of the blood thinner enoxaparin after discharge may become more common as surgical stays become shorter, Dr. Smith said. She urged surgeons to keep its cost in mind: a 10-day course can be as little as $2 with Medicaid or as much as $140 (a cash price for patients without coverage).
• Make sure to adjust medications based on preoperative or intraoperative doses, she said, to avoid endangering patients by inadvertently doubling up on doses. And watch out for previous use of gabapentin, which is part of enhanced-recovery protocols. Patients who take the drug at home should be put back on their typical dose.
• Also, she warned, “don’t give gabapentin to someone who’s never had it before plus an opioid.” This, she said, can cause delirium.
• Consider starting liquids the night of surgery so patients can begin taking their home medications such as sleep, chronic pain, and psychiatric drugs. Patients will be more stable and satisfied, Dr. Smith said.
• Don’t prescribe hard-to-find medications like oxycodone oral solution or oral ketorolac. These drugs will send patients from pharmacy to pharmacy in search of them, Dr. Smith said.
• Embrace a “Meds to Beds” program if possible. These programs enlist on-site pharmacies to deliver medications to bedside for patients to take home.
• Consider Tylenol as a postoperative painkiller with scheduled doses and be aware that you can prescribe the over-the-counter adult liquid form. However, Dr. Smith cautioned that Tylenol is “not great” on an as-needed basis. Gabapentin and celecoxib (unless contraindicated) are also helpful for postop pain relief, and they’re inexpensive, she said. Three to five days should be enough in most minimally invasive surgeries.
• Don’t overprescribe opioids. “The more we prescribe, the more they will consume,” Dr. Smith said. Check the American College of Surgeons guidelines regarding the ideal number of postsurgery, 5-mg doses of oxycodone to prescribe to opioid-naive patients at discharge. No more than 10 or 15 pills are recommended for several types of general surgery (J Amer Coll Surg. 2018;227:411-8).

Global Academy for Medical Education and this news organization are owned by the same parent company. Dr. Smith reports no relevant disclosures.

LAS VEGAS – Communicate with your pharmacists to keep nurse phone calls and empty medication-dispensing devices at bay. Watch out for overlapping medication orders. Beware of gabapentin mishaps, and embrace Tylenol – but not always.

Randy Dotinga/MDedge News

April Smith, PharmD, associate professor of pharmacy practice at Creighton University, Omaha, offered these tips about postoperative care to surgeons at the 2019 Annual Minimally Invasive Surgery Symposium by Global Academy for Medical Education.

“We’re probably one of the most underutilized professions you have on your team,” she said, adding that “we have to know what you’re doing to help you.”

As she explained, “if you’re going to have a new order set, let us know that, so we can be your allies in helping nurses and other people understand why we’re doing what we’re doing. I’m on the same floor, and the nurses are coming up to me and asking me questions. If I can explain to them why we’re doing these things, they’ll get on board a lot faster and save you a lot of phone calls. I know you’re surgeons and you hate that [phone calls].”

Better communication with pharmacists can also boost the stocking of enhanced-recovery medications in automatic dispensing machines, she said, so they’re ready when patients need them.

Dr. Smith offered these tips about specific postsurgery medications:

• Scopolamine is a “great drug for post-op vomiting and nausea,” Dr. Smith said. But do not use it in patients over 65, and it’s contraindicated in glaucoma. Beware of these notable side effects: Blurry vision, constipation, and urinary retention. Dexamethasone and ondansetron can be used as an alternative, she said.
• Use of the blood thinner enoxaparin after discharge may become more common as surgical stays become shorter, Dr. Smith said. She urged surgeons to keep its cost in mind: a 10-day course can be as little as $2 with Medicaid or as much as $140 (a cash price for patients without coverage).
• Make sure to adjust medications based on preoperative or intraoperative doses, she said, to avoid endangering patients by inadvertently doubling up on doses. And watch out for previous use of gabapentin, which is part of enhanced-recovery protocols. Patients who take the drug at home should be put back on their typical dose.
• Also, she warned, “don’t give gabapentin to someone who’s never had it before plus an opioid.” This, she said, can cause delirium.
• Consider starting liquids the night of surgery so patients can begin taking their home medications such as sleep, chronic pain, and psychiatric drugs. Patients will be more stable and satisfied, Dr. Smith said.
• Don’t prescribe hard-to-find medications like oxycodone oral solution or oral ketorolac. These drugs will send patients from pharmacy to pharmacy in search of them, Dr. Smith said.
• Embrace a “Meds to Beds” program if possible. These programs enlist on-site pharmacies to deliver medications to bedside for patients to take home.
• Consider Tylenol as a postoperative painkiller with scheduled doses and be aware that you can prescribe the over-the-counter adult liquid form. However, Dr. Smith cautioned that Tylenol is “not great” on an as-needed basis. Gabapentin and celecoxib (unless contraindicated) are also helpful for postop pain relief, and they’re inexpensive, she said. Three to five days should be enough in most minimally invasive surgeries.
• Don’t overprescribe opioids. “The more we prescribe, the more they will consume,” Dr. Smith said. Check the American College of Surgeons guidelines regarding the ideal number of postsurgery, 5-mg doses of oxycodone to prescribe to opioid-naive patients at discharge. No more than 10 or 15 pills are recommended for several types of general surgery (J Amer Coll Surg. 2018;227:411-8).

Global Academy for Medical Education and this news organization are owned by the same parent company. Dr. Smith reports no relevant disclosures.

Although VA nursing homes, on the whole, have sicker patients than do those in private sector nursing homes, they compare closely in terms of quality of care—and in some cases, VA health care gets higher marks. VA has more higher performing facilities (17% vs 11%) and fewer low-performing facilities (17% vs 20%).

Those figures come from the health care inspection reports and staffing data for its 134 community living centers (CLCs) that the VA is, for the first time, posting publicly. So far, VA has posted 101 health inspection reports; the remainder are scheduled for later this year. The reports cover April 2018 to the present.

The VA reports are based on yearly, unannounced inspections conducted by an outside contracted agency. The survey teams assess a variety of aspects of life at VA nursing homes, such as the care of residents and the processes used to give that care, how the staff and residents interact, and the nursing home environment. The surveyors also review residents’ clinical records and interview residents, family members, caregivers, and staff.

VA nursing homes also had a significantly lower percentage (6%) of 1-star (lowest rated) nursing homes compared with 15,487 private sector nursing homes rated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Both Medicare-certified skilled nursing facilities and VA CLCs must meet federal standards, such as having enough staff to provide adequate care. “There is significant evidence of a relationship between resident outcomes and staffing levels in nursing homes,” the VA says in its description of survey criteria.

Many VA nursing home residents are being treated for conditions rarely seen in private sector nursing homes, the VA says, including veteran-specific conditions, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (12% vs 0.5%) and traumatic brain injury (2% vs 0.8%). In 2018, 42% of 41,076 VA CLC residents had a service-connected disability rating of ≥ 50%. CLCs also provide more hospice care and care for conditions related to homelessness.

However, the VA notes that “quality measures are not the same as quality standards.” According to Medicare Nursing Home Compare, the quality of resident care measures are not benchmarks, thresholds, guidelines, or standards of care—they are a “snapshot at a point in time” of the average condition of residents. For instance, individual CLCs may serve special populations and have a higher rate of certain conditions. A CLC that specializes in complex skin and wound care may admit veterans with severe pressure ulcers that occurred at home or another hospital.

Detailed information on individual quality measures and how VA facilities compare with others in their areas are available at www.accesstocare.va.gov/healthcare/qualityofcare. That site also has an interactive searchable map that can be used to locate CLCs by zip code or distance. The health inspection reports are available at www.va.gov/qualityofcare/apps/aspire/clcsurvey.aspx.

Although VA nursing homes, on the whole, have sicker patients than do those in private sector nursing homes, they compare closely in terms of quality of care—and in some cases, VA health care gets higher marks. VA has more higher performing facilities (17% vs 11%) and fewer low-performing facilities (17% vs 20%).

Those figures come from the health care inspection reports and staffing data for its 134 community living centers (CLCs) that the VA is, for the first time, posting publicly. So far, VA has posted 101 health inspection reports; the remainder are scheduled for later this year. The reports cover April 2018 to the present.

The VA reports are based on yearly, unannounced inspections conducted by an outside contracted agency. The survey teams assess a variety of aspects of life at VA nursing homes, such as the care of residents and the processes used to give that care, how the staff and residents interact, and the nursing home environment. The surveyors also review residents’ clinical records and interview residents, family members, caregivers, and staff.

VA nursing homes also had a significantly lower percentage (6%) of 1-star (lowest rated) nursing homes compared with 15,487 private sector nursing homes rated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Both Medicare-certified skilled nursing facilities and VA CLCs must meet federal standards, such as having enough staff to provide adequate care. “There is significant evidence of a relationship between resident outcomes and staffing levels in nursing homes,” the VA says in its description of survey criteria.

Many VA nursing home residents are being treated for conditions rarely seen in private sector nursing homes, the VA says, including veteran-specific conditions, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (12% vs 0.5%) and traumatic brain injury (2% vs 0.8%). In 2018, 42% of 41,076 VA CLC residents had a service-connected disability rating of ≥ 50%. CLCs also provide more hospice care and care for conditions related to homelessness.

However, the VA notes that “quality measures are not the same as quality standards.” According to Medicare Nursing Home Compare, the quality of resident care measures are not benchmarks, thresholds, guidelines, or standards of care—they are a “snapshot at a point in time” of the average condition of residents. For instance, individual CLCs may serve special populations and have a higher rate of certain conditions. A CLC that specializes in complex skin and wound care may admit veterans with severe pressure ulcers that occurred at home or another hospital.

Detailed information on individual quality measures and how VA facilities compare with others in their areas are available at www.accesstocare.va.gov/healthcare/qualityofcare. That site also has an interactive searchable map that can be used to locate CLCs by zip code or distance. The health inspection reports are available at www.va.gov/qualityofcare/apps/aspire/clcsurvey.aspx.

Although VA nursing homes, on the whole, have sicker patients than do those in private sector nursing homes, they compare closely in terms of quality of care—and in some cases, VA health care gets higher marks. VA has more higher performing facilities (17% vs 11%) and fewer low-performing facilities (17% vs 20%).

Those figures come from the health care inspection reports and staffing data for its 134 community living centers (CLCs) that the VA is, for the first time, posting publicly. So far, VA has posted 101 health inspection reports; the remainder are scheduled for later this year. The reports cover April 2018 to the present.

The VA reports are based on yearly, unannounced inspections conducted by an outside contracted agency. The survey teams assess a variety of aspects of life at VA nursing homes, such as the care of residents and the processes used to give that care, how the staff and residents interact, and the nursing home environment. The surveyors also review residents’ clinical records and interview residents, family members, caregivers, and staff.

VA nursing homes also had a significantly lower percentage (6%) of 1-star (lowest rated) nursing homes compared with 15,487 private sector nursing homes rated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Both Medicare-certified skilled nursing facilities and VA CLCs must meet federal standards, such as having enough staff to provide adequate care. “There is significant evidence of a relationship between resident outcomes and staffing levels in nursing homes,” the VA says in its description of survey criteria.

Many VA nursing home residents are being treated for conditions rarely seen in private sector nursing homes, the VA says, including veteran-specific conditions, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (12% vs 0.5%) and traumatic brain injury (2% vs 0.8%). In 2018, 42% of 41,076 VA CLC residents had a service-connected disability rating of ≥ 50%. CLCs also provide more hospice care and care for conditions related to homelessness.

However, the VA notes that “quality measures are not the same as quality standards.” According to Medicare Nursing Home Compare, the quality of resident care measures are not benchmarks, thresholds, guidelines, or standards of care—they are a “snapshot at a point in time” of the average condition of residents. For instance, individual CLCs may serve special populations and have a higher rate of certain conditions. A CLC that specializes in complex skin and wound care may admit veterans with severe pressure ulcers that occurred at home or another hospital.

Detailed information on individual quality measures and how VA facilities compare with others in their areas are available at www.accesstocare.va.gov/healthcare/qualityofcare. That site also has an interactive searchable map that can be used to locate CLCs by zip code or distance. The health inspection reports are available at www.va.gov/qualityofcare/apps/aspire/clcsurvey.aspx.

Hospitalist Benji K. Mathews, MD, SFHM, CLHM, will bring a unique commitment to medical education to HM20, which will be held next year on April 16-18 in San Diego.

Dr. Mathews enjoys receiving technological gadgets periodically at his home. Just ask his elementary school–age children: They’ve learned how to use handheld ultrasound devices on each other.

“They’re able to find their siblings’ kidneys and hearts,” said Dr. Mathews, an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, and a hospitalist with HealthPartners in Saint Paul, Minn. “I often show an image of this to encourage hospitalists that, if children can pick it up, highly educated providers can do the same and more!”

Society of Hospital Medicine members and nonmembers who would like to submit proposals for workshops and didactic sessions at HM20 must move quickly. “The open call for content opened in January 2019, providing enough time to prepare and submit,” Dr. Mathews said. “The HM20 call for content will stay open for 2 weeks after HM19 is wrapped up.”

Dr. Mathews expects HM20 will build upon the successes of this year’s conference and support SHM’s commitment to diversity in voices and programming. More than 4,000 attendees are expected.

“HM20 is a team effort with a diverse group serving on the annual meeting planning committee,” he said. “In conjunction with the submissions we receive from the open call, the Annual Conference Committee really builds on the momentum and feedback from attendees from the previous year’s annual meeting. We will identify popular sessions and topics and also review the data we receive from attendees about how they rated sessions and speakers. The chair and committee members will review all of these metrics and use them to plan HM20.”

Dr. Mathews said several topics will get special emphasis in 2020. “We would like to have more content for nurse practitioners and physician assistants and continued representation from the broad range of hospitalists throughout the nation in academic and community settings,” he said.

“We’re also hoping to provide more credit offerings in addition to those we now offer via the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American Osteopathic Association. Next year, we’re hoping to offer pharmacology credit.”

In addition, he said, “we hope to have focused content on diversity issues such as women in hospital medicine and gender and racial bias. We also plan to provide a continued focus on integration of work and life and topics in technology such as bedside ultrasound and telemedicine.”

Technology will be more than a topic at HM20. SHM plans to embrace it in the conference itself to a greater extent than ever before. “We hope to build an online interactive schedule so that attendees may search tracks by day and credit type and schedule their sessions ahead of time,” Dr. Mathews said. “There will still be a PDF schedule, but we hope to push a more interactive, paperless version. We also hope to have e-posters for the first time at HM20.”

The emphasis on technology is a perfect fit for Dr. Mathews, who’s a pioneer in the use of bedside ultrasound. “I was fortunate to be a part of a great residency program at the University of Minnesota Medical School, which started a hospital medicine pathway that had several nationally recognized hospital medicine leaders as mentors. I was lucky to work with several of them through the HealthPartners organization in Saint Paul, and that developed in me a further desire to practice hospital medicine,” he said. “The group and mentors provided opportunities to develop further niches in my practice. I took an interest in the field of improving diagnosis and combined it with the 21st-century innovative tool of bedside ultrasound. Now, I continue to teach clinicians, educators, and learners.”

Dr. Mathews has no relevant disclosures.

Hospitalist Benji K. Mathews, MD, SFHM, CLHM, will bring a unique commitment to medical education to HM20, which will be held next year on April 16-18 in San Diego.

Dr. Mathews enjoys receiving technological gadgets periodically at his home. Just ask his elementary school–age children: They’ve learned how to use handheld ultrasound devices on each other.

“They’re able to find their siblings’ kidneys and hearts,” said Dr. Mathews, an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, and a hospitalist with HealthPartners in Saint Paul, Minn. “I often show an image of this to encourage hospitalists that, if children can pick it up, highly educated providers can do the same and more!”

Society of Hospital Medicine members and nonmembers who would like to submit proposals for workshops and didactic sessions at HM20 must move quickly. “The open call for content opened in January 2019, providing enough time to prepare and submit,” Dr. Mathews said. “The HM20 call for content will stay open for 2 weeks after HM19 is wrapped up.”

Dr. Mathews expects HM20 will build upon the successes of this year’s conference and support SHM’s commitment to diversity in voices and programming. More than 4,000 attendees are expected.

“HM20 is a team effort with a diverse group serving on the annual meeting planning committee,” he said. “In conjunction with the submissions we receive from the open call, the Annual Conference Committee really builds on the momentum and feedback from attendees from the previous year’s annual meeting. We will identify popular sessions and topics and also review the data we receive from attendees about how they rated sessions and speakers. The chair and committee members will review all of these metrics and use them to plan HM20.”

Dr. Mathews said several topics will get special emphasis in 2020. “We would like to have more content for nurse practitioners and physician assistants and continued representation from the broad range of hospitalists throughout the nation in academic and community settings,” he said.

“We’re also hoping to provide more credit offerings in addition to those we now offer via the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American Osteopathic Association. Next year, we’re hoping to offer pharmacology credit.”

In addition, he said, “we hope to have focused content on diversity issues such as women in hospital medicine and gender and racial bias. We also plan to provide a continued focus on integration of work and life and topics in technology such as bedside ultrasound and telemedicine.”

Technology will be more than a topic at HM20. SHM plans to embrace it in the conference itself to a greater extent than ever before. “We hope to build an online interactive schedule so that attendees may search tracks by day and credit type and schedule their sessions ahead of time,” Dr. Mathews said. “There will still be a PDF schedule, but we hope to push a more interactive, paperless version. We also hope to have e-posters for the first time at HM20.”

The emphasis on technology is a perfect fit for Dr. Mathews, who’s a pioneer in the use of bedside ultrasound. “I was fortunate to be a part of a great residency program at the University of Minnesota Medical School, which started a hospital medicine pathway that had several nationally recognized hospital medicine leaders as mentors. I was lucky to work with several of them through the HealthPartners organization in Saint Paul, and that developed in me a further desire to practice hospital medicine,” he said. “The group and mentors provided opportunities to develop further niches in my practice. I took an interest in the field of improving diagnosis and combined it with the 21st-century innovative tool of bedside ultrasound. Now, I continue to teach clinicians, educators, and learners.”

Dr. Mathews has no relevant disclosures.

Hospitalist Benji K. Mathews, MD, SFHM, CLHM, will bring a unique commitment to medical education to HM20, which will be held next year on April 16-18 in San Diego.

Dr. Mathews enjoys receiving technological gadgets periodically at his home. Just ask his elementary school–age children: They’ve learned how to use handheld ultrasound devices on each other.

“They’re able to find their siblings’ kidneys and hearts,” said Dr. Mathews, an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, and a hospitalist with HealthPartners in Saint Paul, Minn. “I often show an image of this to encourage hospitalists that, if children can pick it up, highly educated providers can do the same and more!”

Society of Hospital Medicine members and nonmembers who would like to submit proposals for workshops and didactic sessions at HM20 must move quickly. “The open call for content opened in January 2019, providing enough time to prepare and submit,” Dr. Mathews said. “The HM20 call for content will stay open for 2 weeks after HM19 is wrapped up.”

Dr. Mathews expects HM20 will build upon the successes of this year’s conference and support SHM’s commitment to diversity in voices and programming. More than 4,000 attendees are expected.

“HM20 is a team effort with a diverse group serving on the annual meeting planning committee,” he said. “In conjunction with the submissions we receive from the open call, the Annual Conference Committee really builds on the momentum and feedback from attendees from the previous year’s annual meeting. We will identify popular sessions and topics and also review the data we receive from attendees about how they rated sessions and speakers. The chair and committee members will review all of these metrics and use them to plan HM20.”

Dr. Mathews said several topics will get special emphasis in 2020. “We would like to have more content for nurse practitioners and physician assistants and continued representation from the broad range of hospitalists throughout the nation in academic and community settings,” he said.

“We’re also hoping to provide more credit offerings in addition to those we now offer via the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American Osteopathic Association. Next year, we’re hoping to offer pharmacology credit.”

In addition, he said, “we hope to have focused content on diversity issues such as women in hospital medicine and gender and racial bias. We also plan to provide a continued focus on integration of work and life and topics in technology such as bedside ultrasound and telemedicine.”

Technology will be more than a topic at HM20. SHM plans to embrace it in the conference itself to a greater extent than ever before. “We hope to build an online interactive schedule so that attendees may search tracks by day and credit type and schedule their sessions ahead of time,” Dr. Mathews said. “There will still be a PDF schedule, but we hope to push a more interactive, paperless version. We also hope to have e-posters for the first time at HM20.”

The emphasis on technology is a perfect fit for Dr. Mathews, who’s a pioneer in the use of bedside ultrasound. “I was fortunate to be a part of a great residency program at the University of Minnesota Medical School, which started a hospital medicine pathway that had several nationally recognized hospital medicine leaders as mentors. I was lucky to work with several of them through the HealthPartners organization in Saint Paul, and that developed in me a further desire to practice hospital medicine,” he said. “The group and mentors provided opportunities to develop further niches in my practice. I took an interest in the field of improving diagnosis and combined it with the 21st-century innovative tool of bedside ultrasound. Now, I continue to teach clinicians, educators, and learners.”

Dr. Mathews has no relevant disclosures.