SAN ANTONIO – A meta-analysis of five trials among 873 premenopausal women with early breast cancer finds that temporarily suppressing ovarian function with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog during chemotherapy helps preserve fertility, reducing risk of premature ovarian insufficiency by 62% and nearly doubling the posttreatment pregnancy rate. In an interview at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, lead investigator Matteo Lambertini, MD, of the Institut Jules Bordet in Brussels, Belgium, discussed subgroup findings, the risk-benefit profile, and appropriate patient selection, as well as avenues for future research in this area.

SAN ANTONIO – A meta-analysis of five trials among 873 premenopausal women with early breast cancer finds that temporarily suppressing ovarian function with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog during chemotherapy helps preserve fertility, reducing risk of premature ovarian insufficiency by 62% and nearly doubling the posttreatment pregnancy rate. In an interview at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, lead investigator Matteo Lambertini, MD, of the Institut Jules Bordet in Brussels, Belgium, discussed subgroup findings, the risk-benefit profile, and appropriate patient selection, as well as avenues for future research in this area.

SAN ANTONIO – A meta-analysis of five trials among 873 premenopausal women with early breast cancer finds that temporarily suppressing ovarian function with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog during chemotherapy helps preserve fertility, reducing risk of premature ovarian insufficiency by 62% and nearly doubling the posttreatment pregnancy rate. In an interview at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, lead investigator Matteo Lambertini, MD, of the Institut Jules Bordet in Brussels, Belgium, discussed subgroup findings, the risk-benefit profile, and appropriate patient selection, as well as avenues for future research in this area.

From the University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT.

Abstract

• Objective: To review the metabolic complications of HIV infection.
• Methods: Review of the literature in the context of 3 clinical cases.
• Results: People with HIV infection are living longer thanks to the advent of potent antiretroviral therapy. This has led to increased incidence of age-related metabolic complications, including a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, hyperlipidemia, metabolic syndrome, and osteoporosis. Appropriate management of these complications requires an understanding of disease-related and drug-related side effects as well as the potential for drug-drug interactions. A multidisciplinary approach to patient management is most effective.
• Conclusion: Awareness of the metabolic complications frequently encountered in HIV infection, drug interactions, and possible toxicities is critical to the successful management of HIV-infected individuals.

Key words: HIV; antiretroviral therapy; hyperlipidemia; metabolic syndrome; diabetes; hypogonadism.

According to the most recent data from the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), 36 million people worldwide are living with HIV/AIDS, with 18 million accessing effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) [1]. The past 2 decades have witnessed enormous advances in the field from prevention to diagnosis and therapeutics, and modern ART largely allows HIV-infected persons to live near-normal life spans [2,3]. However, from the beginning of the epidemic, HIV-infected persons on effective therapy have suffered from myriad metabolic consequences, many of which affect quality of life and result in excess mortality [4]. It is also true that untreated HIV infection portends an increased risk of metabolic complications, likely related to abnormal immune activation, as demonstrated in structured interruption trials [5,6]. It is worth noting, however, that while many of these metabolic dyscrasias and associated risks have historically been attributed primarily to the treatment of HIV infection with ART, data from cohort studies and randomized clinical trials have repeatedly demonstrated significant reductions in morbidity and mortality when ART is initiated early [7]. In this paper, we review HIV-related metabolic complications frequently encountered in clinical practice (hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and bone disease) and best practice considerations in the context of 3 clinical cases.

Case Patient 1

Initial Presentation and History

A 58-year-old male with a history of hypertension and mixed hyperlipidemia is referred for evaluation of newly diagnosed HIV infection. He has no history of intravenous drug use but has had multiple male and female sex partners in the past few years, and requested testing after a partner tested positive. His last negative test was 2 years ago. The patient does not smoke cigarettes. Overall he feels well and tolerates his regimen of lisinopril 10 mg and simvastatin 20 mg daily. On initial evaluation, his exam is unremarkable other than subtle white plaques on the dorsal surface of the tongue and buccal mucosa, and moderate central obesity. Vital signs including blood pressure are normal. Initial laboratory evaluation reveals a CD4 cell count of 150 cells/mm³ and an HIV RNA level of 200,000 copies/mL. Fasting serum total cholesterol is 220 mg/dL, triglycerides 250 mg/dL, LDL 170 mg/dL, and HDL 35 mg/dL. Serum BUN, creatinine, and liver function testing results are normal.

• What initial regimen might be recommended based on the status of his HIV infection and comorbidities?

The most recent iteration of the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) guidelines on use of antiretroviral agents (ARVs) in HIV recommends an initial ART regimen that includes a backbone of 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), generally tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or tenofovir alafenamide, abacavir (ABC), emtricitabine (FTC), or lamivudine (3TC) [2]. To this backbone should be added a third agent; the majority of those currently recommended are integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) (dolutegravir, elvitegravir, raltegravir); one recommended protease inhibitor (PI) (ritonavir-boosted darunavir) is also an option. Some of these initial recommended regimens are available as fixed-dosed combinations in 1 pill, making them attractive options.

The latest guidelines also clearly recommend starting ART in all HIV-infected individuals, irrespective of CD4 count. The patient described above has a very low CD4 count, so there is no question he needs to begin therapy promptly. Given his low CD4 count and relatively high viral load, one may consider a ritonavir-boosted PI as perhaps the most robust option and with a relatively high barrier to resistance development, in contrast to other options. Assuming the patient’s baseline resistance testing reveals a fully sensitive wild-type virus without meaningful resistance mutations, he will begin a regimen of TDF/FTC plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir, 3 pills once daily. Given his low CD4 count (below 200 cells/mm³), he will also need prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, in the form of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) daily. Given the potential for interaction between the boosted PI and simvastatin, his lipid-lowering agent is switched to atorvastatin 10 mg daily.

• What is the association between hyperlipidemia and HIV infection and treatment?

Hyperlipidemia represents a key modifiable risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in HIV-infected individuals [8]. Indeed, a multicenter cross-sectional study of older HIV-infected individuals performed in Spain revealed a 54% prevalence of dyslipidemia and 23% CVD [9]. Most experts believe that metabolic abnormalities observed in HIV-infected individuals are the result of a combination of factors: those resulting from abnormal immune activation and inflammation related to viral replication, and those related to certain ARVs [10].

Early after HIV seroconversion, decline in HDL is one of the first proatherogenic changes observed. This, along with increased triglyceride and LDL levels, likely contribute to increased risk of CVD in this population. Increased microbial translocation, evidenced by increased levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), may drive immune activation, leading to dyslipidemia via a multitude of hypothesized mechanisms [4]. It has been theorized that HDL lipoproteins are less stable on ART, leading to potentially impaired plasma lipolytic activities or hepatic cholesteryl ester uptake [6,11]. Increased VLDL from release of free fatty acids may lead to higher triglyceride levels and triglyceride-rich LDL and HDL, all associated with increased risk of CVD [11].

In terms of effects of specific ARV classes, although newer agents have less of a propensity to cause dyslipidemia, the PI class arguably remains most problematic. In comparison to other classes, the PIs tend to result in greater increases in triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL, and have frequent drug-drug interactions with lipid-lowering agents [10,12]. Estimated prevalence of dyslipidemia in patients receiving PI therapy varies from 28% to 80% [13]. The prospective multinational cohort Data collection on Adverse events of Anti-HIV Drugs (DAD) study found significantly higher rates of hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, and low HDL in patients on PIs in comparison to non–nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) [14]. Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain the PIs adverse effects on lipids, including inhibition of lipogenesis and adipocyte differentiation, decreased hepatocyte clearance of chylomicrons and VLDL, and increased hepatic synthesis of triglycerides [15]. Of the available PIs, atazanavir and darunavir have less potential to lead to dyslipidemia [10], while lopinavir/ritonavir, fosamprenavir, and tipranavir may have the highest [13]. Of the NNRTIs, efavirenz is most frequently associated with dyslipidemia, specifically increased triglycerides and total cholesterol [13]. However, these increased values seen on efavirenz therapy may be offset by relative increases in HDL, with little resultant effect on the total cholesterol:HDL ratio. Rilpivirine, etravirine, and nevirapine are relatively less likely to drive lipid changes, although certain drug interactions are important to recognize in clinical practice, such as the interaction between rilpivirine and proton pump inhibitors [2,13,16]. It is also worth noting that no NNRTIs are included in current guidelines as preferred therapy [2].

Historically, the thymidine analogue NRTIs (stavudine, didanosine, zidovudine) have been associated with lipid dyscrasias and lipoatrophy, but fortunately these are no longer used frequenty except in cases requiring deep salvage therapy for highly treatment-experienced patients. Two newer NRTIs, tenofovir and abacavir, have relatively neutral to favorable effects on lipids. The combination of tenofovir disoproxil (TDF) and emtricitabine (trade name Truvada) was associated with significantly lower triglycerides, total cholesterol and LDL than other NRTI pairs [6]. TDF has been postulated to have lipid-lowering effects. Switch studies in which patients were taken off thymidine analogues and placed on TDF, demonstrated recovery of limb fat in patients with lipoatrophy, and those switched off abacavir-based ART to TDF showed statistically significant lower fasting total cholesterol at week 12, without differences of viral suppression [8]. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a next-generation prodrug of tenofovir that results in improved stability in plasma and higher intracellular levels in comparison to TDF [17]. Although randomized controlled trials of TAF vs TDF-based ARV regimens have suggested statistically higher total cholesterol, serum HDL is also increased resulting in unchanged total:HDL ratios and no differences in risk classifications [18]. Integrase inhibitors (INSTI) now represent first-line therapy in combination with an NRTI backbone, and since their availability in 2007 have been evaluated in comparison to various PIs and NNRTIs. Both raltegravir and dolutegravir have consistently shown broad neutral effects on lipids and are among the most metabolically friendly agents available [19–21]. Because it is given in fixed-dose combination with non-ritonavir pharmacologic booster cobicistat, elvitegravir has effects similar to ritonavir-boosted PIs on lipids [6].

• What are management considerations in the treatment of hyperlipidemia in HIV-infected patients?

Patients with HIV and hyperlipidemia may benefit from lipid-lowering therapy in addition to ART, although in certain cases appropriate switches may make a difference. Careful consideration of drug interactions between ARVs and lipid-lowering agents, in addition to ARV history and known drug resistance, is warranted prior to selecting a regimen in these patients. In addition, the latest American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines suggest evaluating 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) using the pooled cohort equation to determine the type and dose of statin required (moderate vs high intensity) [22]. It is noteworthy that HIV infection and its therapies are not taken into account as potential risk factors in this model. Primary prevention in non-diabetic patients with a statin is recommended for patients with a 10-year absolute risk of ≥ 7.5% [22]. This patient’s risk is estimated at between 12% and 13% based on this equation, so primary prevention with a moderate-or high-intensity statin is recommended (Table 1) [23]. Data from more than 80,000 patients in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) showed that HIV-infected patients with no baseline ASCVD had 50% increased risk of acute myocardial infarction when compared to HIV-uninfected patients over 6 years of follow-up [24]. Thus, consideration of the virus itself or its therapy as an additional risk factor may be valid.

Screening and Monitoring of Hyperlipidemia

The most recent iteration of the DHHS primary care guidelines for the management of HIV-infected individuals recommends obtaining fasting (ideally 12 hours) lipid profiles upon initiation of care, and within 1 to 3 months of beginning therapy [12,13]. These initial levels, along with other elements of the patient’s history and calculation of risk may help determine whether lipid-lowering therapy is indicated, and if so, which therapy would be best. In general, after regimen switches or additions of either ARV or statin therapy, repeating fasting lipid levels 6 weeks later is recommended to gauge the effects of the switch. This is especially critical when interactions between ARVs and lipid-lowering therapies are possible. Some experts recommend performing annual screening of patients with normal baseline lipids or with well-controlled hyperlipidemia on therapy. Assessment of 10-year ASCVD risk is also recommended annually, in addition to baseline risk assessment, to determine the need and appropriateness of statin therapy [25]. The question of primary prevention in HIV has yet to be definitively answered. Small studies in this population have demonstrated that statins have the potential to slow progression of carotid intima media thickness and reduce noncalcified plaque volume [24]. An NIH/AIDS Clinical Trial Group–sponsored randomized clinical trial (“REPRIEVE”) is currently underway to address this question. More than 6000 HIV-infected men and women with no history of ASCVD at 100 sites in several countries are enrolled to assess the benefit of pitavastatin as primary prevention in this risk group [24]. Metabolized via glucuronidation primarily, as opposed to cytochrome p450 (CYP 3A4 isoenzyme), pitavastatin is thought to have fewer drug interactions with ARVs in general [6] (Table 2).

Relevant Drug-Drug Interactions

Deciding which statin to begin in HIV-infected patients depends on whether moderate- or high-intensity therapy is warranted and whether the potential for drug interaction with ARVs exists. Table 2 [6,12] depicts available statins and the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction with the primary ARV classes. Simvastatin and lovastatin are heavily metabolized via the CYP 3A4 pathway, resulting in the highest potential risk of interaction with CYP 3A4 inhibitors, such as the PIs, or inducers (eg, NNRTIs, in particular efavirenz) [6]. The former may inhibit metabolism of these statins, resulting in increased risk of toxicity, while co-administration with efavirenz, for example, may result in inadequate serum concentration and therefore inadequate lipid-lowering effects. Although less lipophilic, atorvastatin results in similar interactions with PIs and NNRTIs, and therefore low starting doses with close monitoring is recommended [6]. Fewer interactions have been noted with rosuvastatin, pravastatin, and pitavastatin, as these do not require CYP 3A4 for their metabolism and are thus less likely to be affected by ARVs. These therefore represent potentially safer first choices for certain patients on ARVs, although of these, only rosuvastatin is classified as a high-intensity statin [22,23] (Table 1). When compared directly to pravastatin 40 mg daily in patients receiving ritonavir-boosted PIs, rosuvastatin performed superiorly at 10 mg per day, resulting in more significant reductions in LDL and triglyceride levels [15]. Although it is eliminated largely unchanged through the kidney and liver, pravastatin has been reported to idiosyncratically interact with darunavir, resulting in potentially increased pravastatin levels and associated toxicity [25]. Treatment of pure hypertriglyceridemia in HIV-infected patients should begin with fibrates, which have little to no risk of interaction with most clinically relevant ARVs [6,10]. Alternatives to lower triglycerides include niacin and N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids [25].

Case 1 Continued

The patient has an impressive response to his initial regimen of TDF/FTC plus boosted darunavir, with repeat CD4 count after 12 weeks of 275 (18%) cells/mm³ and an undetectable viral load (< 20 copies/mL). Other lab parameters are favorable and he is tolerating the regimen well without notable side effects. However, at his next visit, although his viral load remains undetectable, his triglyceride level has increased to 350 mg/dL, although other lipid parameters are comparable to the prior result. He complains of diffuse body aches, concentrated in large muscle groups of the extremities, and dark-colored urine. A creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level is elevated at 300 IU/L (normal, 22–269, negative MB fraction). Serum creatinine is 1.4 mg/dL (had been 1.1 mg/dL at baseline). Given he has done so well otherwise on these ARVs, he is reluctant to make any changes.

• What drug-drug interaction is most likely causing this patient's problem, and how should it be managed?

This scenario is not uncommon in clinical practice, and changes to regimens are sometimes necessary in order to avoid drug interactions. Care must be taken to thoroughly review antiretroviral history and available resistance testing (in this case a relatively short history) in order to ensure a fully active and suppressive regimen is chosen. This description could be the result of an interaction between lipid-lowering therapy and ARVs resulting in increased relative concentrations of one drug or the other and therefore leading to toxicity. Given this possibility, and suboptimal control of hyperlipidemia, consideration should be given to switching both his ART and his statin therapy.

Safety and Potential Toxicities of Lipid-Lowering Therapy

Increased serum concentration of certain statins when co-administered with CYP 3A4 inhibitors like the PIs leads to heightened risk of statin-associated toxicities. In general, this includes muscle inflammation, leading to increases in serum CPK level and associated symptoms, including myalgias, myositis, or in extreme cases, rhabdomyolysis [6]. Although rare, this toxicity can be serious and may lead to acute renal injury if not recognized and managed appropriately. In theory, the potential for statin-associated hepatotoxicity may also be increased in patients receiving PIs, although this has not been borne out in clinical trials [26]. In fact, quite the opposite may be true, in that statins have been shown to improve liver function in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection and with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [6,15].

Case 1 Conclusion

The patient does well on his new ARV regimen of TAF/FTC and dolutegravir, 2 pills once daily. He no longer requires TMP/SMX, as his CD4 count has been reliably above 200 cells/mm³ on several occasions. Serum creatinine is back down to baseline and CPK has normalized. Fasting lipids have improved since the switch, and he no longer has symptoms of myositis on rosuvastatin 10 mg daily.

Summary

Consideration of statin therapy is complicated by potential drug interactions with ARVs and associated toxicity. However, given known effects of ARVs on lipids, and of immune activation and inflammation related to the virus itself, these patients should be carefully evaluated for statin therapy for their anti-inflammatory and immune modulatory effects as much as for their lipid-lowering ability. Utilization of HIV infection and its therapies as additional cardiovascular risk factors when calculating 10-year risk deserves further consideration; forthcoming results of the REPRIEVE trial are certain to contribute valuable information to this field of study.

Case Patient 2

Initial Presentation and History

A 45-year-old female with history of HIV infection since 2008 presents to the office for new-onset diabetes, diagnosed 2 weeks ago. She has had symptoms of polyuria and polydipsia for the last 1 month. She denies diarrhea, nausea, vomiting or weight loss. She is currently on a regimen consisting of zidovudine/lamivudine plus lopinavir/ritonavir. There is no family history of diabetes. Her examination is unremarkable, including normal vital signs (weight 150 lb, blood pressure 114/70, heart rate 76) and no evidence of insulin resistance, including acanthosis nigricans or striae. Glycosylated hemoglobin level (HbA1c) is 8%. Creatinine and liver function tests are within reference ranges.

• Do HIV-infected patients have a higher incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM)?

Prevalence of type 2 DM in HIV-infected patients varies between 2% to 14% [27]. This variation is due to the different cutoffs used for diagnosis, differences in cohorts studied, and how risk factors are analyzed [28–31]. In a recent nationally representative estimate of DM prevalence among HIV-infected adults receiving medical care in the United States in 2009–2010, the prevalence of DM was noted to be 10.3%. In comparison to the general adult US population, HIV-infected individuals have a 3.8% higher prevalence of DM after adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, poverty-level, obesity, and HCV infection [27].

There is controversy over whether HIV infection itself increases the risk of type 2 DM, with some studies showing increased risk [28,32,33] and others showing no independent effect or an inverse effect [30,34,35]. Studies on the impact of ethnicity and race on prevalence of DM are limited [36].

Certain traditional risk factors (age, ethnicity, obesity) are still responsible for most of the increased risk of diabetes in the HIV-infected population [35,37]. HIV infection itself is associated with metabolic dysfunction, independent of ARV. In HIV-infected patients, impaired glucose metabolism is associated with altered levels of adipokines, increased adiponectin and soluble-tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNFR1) and decreased leptin [38,39]. HIV-associated alterations in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell function also impair glycolysis, which may adversely impact glucose metabolism [40].

Other contributing factors in HIV-infected patients are HCV co-infection [41], medications (atypical antipsychotics, corticosteroids), opiates, and low testosterone [42]. HCV co-infection may lead to hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis, and increasing insulin resistance.

Recent genomic studies show several common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with diabetes in the general population. In the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, SNPs accounted for 14% of type 2 DM risk variability, whereas ARV exposure accounted for 3% and age for 19% of the variability in DM [43].

ARVs also increase the risk of type 2 DM by both direct and indirect effects. Certain ARVs causes lipoatrophy [30] and visceral fat accumulation/lipohypertrophy [29,44]. PIs increase insulin resistance via effects on GLUT-4 transporter and decrease insulin secretion through effects on B cell function [45]. NRTIs (eg, stavudine, zidovudine and didanosine) can cause direct mitochondrial toxicity [46–48]. Utilization of newer ARV agents has decreased the prevalence of severe lipoatrophy, but lipohypertrophy and the underlying metabolic abnormalities persist. The DHHS “preferred” nucleoside analogues, tenofovir and abacavir, do not induce mitochondrial toxicity and have more favorable metabolic profiles [49,50]. In ACTG Study 5142, thymidine-sparing regimens were found to cause less lipoatrophy [51]. In addition, darunavir and atazanavir, the preferred and alternative PIs and the integrase strand transfer inhibitor have limited or modest impact on insulin sensitivity [20,52,53]. This has led to a recent decline in the incidence of type 2 DM in HIV-infected patients.

Statins can also increase insulin resistance and DM [54], although studies have shown mixed results [55–57]. The benefits of statin therapy likely outweigh the risk of DM since there is a significant cardiovascular event reduction with their use [58,59].

• How is diabetes diagnosed in HIV-infected patients?

Optimal diabetes screening guidelines have not been established specifically for HIV-infected patients. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines recommend that diabetes in the general population be diagnosed by 2 elevated fasting blood glucose levels, HbA1c, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), or high random glucose with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia [60]. Repeat testing is recommended every 3 years. The OGTT is recommended for diagnosis in pregnant women.

HbA1c may underestimate glycemic burden in HIV-infected individual due to higher mean corpuscular volume, NRTI use (specifically abacavir), or lower CD4 count [61–65]. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 2013 primary care guidelines for HIV-infected patients recommends obtaining a fasting glucose and/or HbA1c prior to and within 1–3 months after starting ARV [12]. Use of HbA1c threshold cutoff of 5.8% for the diagnosis of DM and testing every 6–12 months are recommended.

• How should this patient’s diabetes be managed?

The ADA guidelines suggest a patient-centered approach to management of diabetes [66]. All patients should be educated about lifestyle modifications with medical nutrition therapy and moderate-intensity aerobic activity and weight loss [67]. If a patient is on lopinavir/ritonavir or a thymidine analogue (zidovudine, stavudine), one should consider switching the ARV regimen [2].

There are currently no randomized controlled trials of diabetes treatment specific to patients with HIV infection. Metformin is the first-line agent. It improves insulin sensitivity by reducing hepatic glucose production and improving peripheral glucose uptake and lipid parameters [68,69]. Other oral hypoglycemic agents used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes are shown in Table 3.

Case 2 Continued

The patient is switched to TAF/FTC plus dolutegravir with improvement in blood sugars. She is also started on metformin. Co-administration of metformin and dolutegravir will be carefully monitored since dolutegravir increases metformin concentration [70]. When dolutegravir is used with metformin, the total daily dose of metformin should be limited to 1000 mg.

• How should this patient be followed?

If the patient is still not at goal HbAb1c at follow-up, there are multiple other treatment options, including use of insulin. Goal HbA1c for most patients with type 2 DM is < 7%; however, this goal should be individualized for each patient in accordance with the ADA guidelines [12]. A longitudinal cohort study of 11,346 veterans with type 2 diabetes compared the glycemic effectiveness of oral diabetic medications ( metformin, sulfonylurea and a thiazolidinedione) among veterans with and without HIV infection. This study did not find any significant difference in HbA1c based on different diabetes medications. However the HBA1c reduction was less in black and Hispanic patients. The mechanism for the poorer response among these patients need to be evaluated further [71]. In addition to management of blood sugar, other CVD risk factors, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, smoking, etc, should be assessed and managed aggressively.

Case Patient 3

Initial Presentation and History

A 45-year-old male with a history of HIV infection diagnosed 10 years ago, on TDF/FTC/efavirenz (trade name Atripla) for the last 7 years, presents with a left femoral neck fracture after he missed the pavement and fell on his left hip. His history is significant for IV drug abuse for 10 years prior to diagnosis of HIV, and he has been on methadone for the last 6 years.

• Is HIV infection associated with increased prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis and increased risk of fractures?

With recent advancements in antiretroviral therapy and improved survival of the HIV-infected population, osteoporosis and increased fracture risk have become important causes of morbidity and mortality. Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength, which predisposes to an increased risk of fracture. The World Health Organization defines osteoporosis as a bone mineral density (BMD) measurement by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, hip, or forearm that is more than 2.5 standard deviations below that of a "young normal" adult (T-score < –2.5) or a history of one or more fragility fractures. Fragility fractures result from mechanical forces that would not ordinarily result in fracture, such as fall from standing height [40]. Osteopenia is characterized by low BMD (T-score between –1.0 and –2.5) and can be a precursor to osteoporosis.

Several observational, retrospective, and prospective studies have shown lower bone density and an increased risk of fractures in the HIV-infected population compared to age-, race- and sex-matched HIV-negative adults. In a large meta-analysis of pooled prevalence data on 884 HIV-infected patients compared with 654 HIV-uninfected age- and sex-matched controls [72], overall, HIV-infected patients had a significant 6.4-fold increased odds of reduced BMD and a 3.7-fold increased odds of osteoporosis compared to the control population. This meta-analysis also compared ARV-treated subjects to ARV-naive subjects and showed that ARV-treated subjects (n = 824) had a higher prevalence of reduced BMD compared with ARV-naive subjects (n= 202; odds ratio 2.5, 95% CI 1.8–3.7). The odds of osteoporosis was increased 2.4 times (95% CI 1.2 – 4.8) in ARV-treated subjects compared with ARV-naive subjects. None of the studies adjusted for potentially important confounding factors, such as age or duration of HIV infection. PI-treated patients (n = 791) were also found to have a higher prevalence of reduced BMD compared with PI-untreated patients (n = 410; OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1–2.0). The odds of osteoporosis in PI-treated patients (n = 666) was also 1.6-fold greater (95% CI 1.1–2.3) than those not treated with PI (n = 367).

Low bone density has also been reported in HIV- positive premenopausal women irrespective of ARV status. In a recent study of 89 premenopausal women (mean age, 37 years) predominantly of African origin with HIV infection, osteopenia and osteoporosis were prevalent in one-third of these women, irrespective of ARV use and were associated with low BMI [73]. In a sub-study of the INSIGHT trial evaluating prevalence of and risk factors for low BMD in untreated HIV infection, performed at several sites across 6 continents involving 424 subjects, osteopenia was present in a third of this relatively young predominantly non-white ART-naive population (mean age 34 + 10 years) with normal CD4 cell counts, while only 2% had osteoporosis. Factors independently associated with lower BMD at the hip and spine were female sex, Latino/Hispanic ethnicity, lower BMI, and higher estimated glomerular filtration rate. Longer duration of HIV infection was also associated with lower hip BMD. Current or nadir CD4 cell count and HIV viral load were not associated with low BMD [74].

Many studies have reported increased fracture prevalence in the HIV population. In a retrospective study of fracture prevalence in a large US health care system, a significantly higher rate of fractures was reported in HIV-infected men and women compared to non-HIV-infected controls (2.87 vs. 1.77 fractures per 100 persons, P < 0.001). The difference in the increased fracture prevalence was greater in HIV positive men compared to women (3.08 vs. 1.83; P < 0.001). Vertebral, wrist and hip fractures were more prevalent in men compared to vertebral and wrist fractures only in women. Fracture prevalence was higher in both Caucasian females and males and only in African-American women [75].

In the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) [76], age-adjusted fracture rates in the HIV population were noted to be 1.98 to 3.69 times higher than rates in the general population. The HOPS was an open prospective cohort study of HIV-infected adults who were followed at 10 US HIV clinics. Rates of first fractures at any anatomic site from 2000–2008 were assessed among 5826 active HOPS patients (median age 40 years, 79% male, 52% Caucasian, and 73% exposed to ART). Among persons aged 25–54 years, both fracture rates and relative proportion of fragility fractures were higher among HOPS patients than among outpatient controls. Older age, substance abuse, nadir CD4+ cell count <200 cells/mm, HCV infection and DM were associated with incident fractures [76].

• What factors contribute to poor bone health in the HIV population?

Several factors that contribute to low bone density are present at a higher rate in the HIV population (Table 4). These include poor nutritional status in terms of suboptimal calcium and vitamin D intake, hypogonadism, low body weight, and alcohol, tobacco and substance abuse.

Vitamin D deficiency is very common in HIV-infected patients, with a prevalence of up to 60% to 75% [77]. Hypogonadism is also relatively common among HIV population [78], contributing to lower bone density. Co-infection with HCV is also associated with increased risk of fractures. In a large cohort of Medicaid beneficiaries, a significant increase in the risk of hip fracture was demonstrated in HCV/HIV co-infected subjects compared either with HCV mono-infected, HIV mono-infected or non-infected individuals [79]. In another large database study, a significantly higher risk of osteoporotic fracture (closed wrist, vertebral or hip fracture) was reported in HCV/HIV co-infected versus HIV mono-infected individuals [80] with fracture rates of 2.57 and 2.07/1000 patient-years (P < 0.001). Dual treatment for HIV/hepatitis B co-infection has also been shown to be associated with a higher risk of hip fracture compared to treatment of HIV mono-infected individuals [81].

HIV infection itself can increase bone loss and reduce bone formation through direct effects related to the HIV antigen load or indirect effects related to activation of the pro-inflammatory cytokines resulting in bone resorption and loss [82]. Co-infection with HCV and/or hepatitis B also contributes to lower bone density in this population. Certain ARVs may also contribute to low bone density in the HIV population. Lipoatrophy related to HIV may also mediate bone loss through complex relationship between central signaling of adipocyte hormones [82,83].

Direct Viral Effects

Several HIV viral proteins have been shown to promote osteoclast activity (vpr and gp120), suppress osteoblast activity (p55-gag) and increase osteoblast apoptosis [84], resulting in increased bone resorption and reduced bone formation, leading to low bone mass. High HIV RNA viral load and T-cell activation are also associated with elevated levels of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), which results in osteoclast formation and increased bone resorption [85]. Other endogenous physiological inhibitors of osteoclastogenesis such as osteoprotegrin and interferon-γ levels are also remarkably downregulated in advanced HIV infection, resulting in increased bone resorption [86]. At a cellular level, HIV proteins including Tat and Nef reduce the number of available mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) precursors that proliferate into osteoblasts by inducing MSC senescence, due to increased oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction resulting in reduced proliferation of osteoblasts and lower rates of bone formation [87]. Collectively, these mechanisms result in significant uncoupling of bone formation and resorption, resulting in less bone formation and greater rate of bone loss and lower bone density.

Pro-inflammatory Pathways

Cytokines and other soluble immune factors play a major role in the physiology of osteoblast maturation and osteoclastic bone resorption [88,89]. Immune dysfunction and persistent inflammation in HIV result in increased levels of several inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and RANKL, resulting in stimulation of osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption [90]. Due to a disruption between T and B cells in HIV and decreased osteoprotegrin (OPG) production and increased RANKL level, RANKL/OPG ratio is elevated, favoring osteoclastogenesis [91].

• Is antiretroviral therapy associated with bone loss?

The initiation of ART has been reported to cause 2% to 6% bone loss irrespective of the regimen used, similar to that sustained in the first 2 years after menopause [92]. Certain NRTIs and PIs are associated with higher rates of bone loss than others. TDF has been associated most commonly with decreased bone mineral density, which usually stabilizes with continued use [93]. In a randomized trial comparing 4 treatment arms of ABC/3TC or TDF/FTC with EFV or ATV/ritonavir, TDF was associated with a greater reduction in BMD compared to abacavir-based regimens [94]. The likely cause of this may be TDF-mediated renal toxicity, including proximal tubular dysfunction and hypophosphatemia, resulting in increased PTH and bone resorption, and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus [95]. TAF is another prodrug of tenofovir diphosphate associated with less renal and bone toxicity compared with TDF. TAF has been associated with significantly less decrease in bone mineral density and renal dysfunction in randomized studies compared to regimen using TDF [17]. Vitamin D deficiency and hypophosphatemia associated with TDF therapy may present with osteomalacia, which predisposes to bone pain and fractures. Treatment with TDF may rarely be associated with the development of Fanconi syndrome and osteomalacia [96]. BMD is often severely reduced and bone pain and pathological fractures are characteristic features. Certain PI regimens containing ritonavir-boosted atazanavir have also been associated with greater bone loss in the spine than the hip, compared to efavirenz-containing regimens [97].

The universal bone loss associated with ART is thought to be a result of the "immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome" (IRIS). This occurs as a result of rapid improvement in immune function after the commencement of ARV as a result of systemic or local inflammation, resulting in increased levels of cytokines that may contribute to bone loss. This has been shown in animal studies where T cell transplantation into immunocompromised mice to mimic ARV-induced T-cell expansion resulted in increased RANKL and TNF-α production by B cells and/or T cells, accompanied by enhanced bone resorption and BMD loss. When TNF-α or RANKL-null T-cells or TNF-α antagonists were used instead, the loss of cortical bone was prevented [98]. In a prospective study evaluating changes in bone turnover markers and inflammatory cytokines with ARV therapy in HIV infected subjects, a significant increase in bone resorption markers, RANKL and TNF-α were seen after initiation of ARV. The magnitude of CD4-cell recovery correlated with the increase in markers of bone resorption [99], suggesting that recovery of the immune system contributes to the increase in cytokine-mediated bone resorption.

• How is bone health and fracture risk assessed in the HIV-positive population?

The predictive value of low BMD for fracture risk assessment in the HIV-positive population has not been established. In the absence of definitive data, the fracture risk assessment and standard methods of measuring bone density using DXA are utilized. In a large study of 1000 men and women, osteoporosis defined as a BMD T-score –2.5 as measured by DXA, was associated with a significantly increased risk of incident fractures but was not a good predictor of morphometric vertebral fractures [100]. In the absence of prospective longitudinal studies evaluating the bone density parameters at which fracture risk is significantly increased in the HIV population, it is reasonable to follow the guidelines used in the non-HIV population.

The approach to treatment of osteopenia and osteoporosis is similar to that in non HIV-infected population and is directed at lifestyle changes and treatment of secondary causes of osteoporosis [101], followed by initiation of antiresorptive therapy.

Management of Bone Disease

There are several guidelines available for the management of bone disease in the HIV population. The most recent guidelines from the IDSA [12] recommend assessing the risk of fragility fracture using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), without DXA, in all HIV-infected men aged 40–49 years and HIV-infected premenopausal women aged ≥ 40 years. DXA should be performed in men aged ≥ 50 years, postmenopausal women, patients with a history of fragility fracture, patients receiving chronic glucocorticoid treatment, and patients at high risk of falls. In resource-limited settings, FRAX without bone mineral density can be substituted for DXA. ART guidelines should be followed. TDF and boosted PIs should be avoided if possible in at-risk patients. Dietary and lifestyle management strategies for high-risk patients should be employed and anti-osteoporosis treatment initiated if indicated [102].

The FRAX tool is available at www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/ and is used to calculate 10-year fracture risk using patient clinical data, including presence of risk factors for osteoporosis. The tool is population-specific by race and region. It has not been validated for the HIV-positive population and may underestimate fracture risk [103]. HIV status is considered a secondary cause of osteoporosis in FRAX calculation.

The National Osteoporosis Foundation recommends screening with DXA for all women > 65 years of age, all men > 70 years of age, and adults > 50 years of age with additional risk factors for osteoporosis. Evaluation for secondary causes for low BMD should always be considered in the HIV-positive population including evaluation of calcium and vitamin D intake. Laboratory testing may include complete blood count, calcium, phosphate, albumin, creatinine, PTH, 25 hydroxy vitamin D (25,OHD) and 24 hour urine for evaluation of calcium, creatinine and phosphate (especially if on TDF) excretion. Testosterone level can be checked in men and estradiol, prolactin, FSH and LH in women for evaluation of hypogonadism. Bone turnover markers (bone specific alkaline phosphatase and serum C-terminal telopeptide) can also be assessed at baseline.

Studies using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HSPQCT) have shown significant reductions in tibial trabecular bone density and trabecular number in pre-menopausal and postmenopausal HIV-infected women [104], with reduced bone stiffness measured using finite element analysis [105]. Co-infection with HCV is also associated with significantly lower trabecular volumetric BMD and smaller cortical dimensions in the tibia, compared to healthy subjects [106]. HSPQCT is not widely available for clinical use at this time. Lateral imaging of the spine or vertebral morphometric analysis may be done in cases of height loss to assess for occult vertebral compression fractures.

There is a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the HIV-infected population [107]. Treatment goal is to have a vitamin D level of at least 30 ng/mL, based on Endocrine Society practice guidelines [108], and may require supplementation with 1000–2000 units of vitamin D daily. Calcium intake should be optimized, averaging 1000 mg per day including diet and supplements, to be taken in divided amounts through the day for optimal absorption. Secondary causes of low bone density as mentioned in Table 4 should also be addressed. Patients should be counseled on tobacco and alcohol abuse. Corticosteroids should be dosed at the lowest dose needed. Medications such as proton pump inhibitors can impair the absorption of calcium carbonate, in which case calcium citrate supplements should be used if there is suboptimal calcium intake in the diet.

• Which medications have been shown to be effective in treatment of osteoporosis in the HIV population?

Bisphosphonates are the mainstay of therapy for osteoporosis in the HIV-infected population. Only alendronate and zoledronate have substantial evidence of safety and effectiveness in the HIV-infected population, but these studies have been small and of limited duration.

Bisphosphonates are pyrophosphate analogues that inhibit bone resorption by binding to the hydroxyapatite crystals in the bone. Several prospective studies have shown alendronate to increase bone density compared to calcium and vitamin D alone in the HIV infected patients with reduced bone density [109,110], with significant reduction in markers of bone resorption [111].

Zoledronic acid (ZA), an amino-bisphosphonate which is infused intravenously, has also been used in smaller studies in HIV-infected persons. In a prospective study evaluating yearly ZA infusion to biennial ZA infusion in subjects with HIV and low bone density [112], biennial ZA infusions were found to be effective in improving and maintaining bone density in the HIV population. In another prospective study evaluating the effects of ZA in HIV-positive men, ZA infusion was given at baseline and at 12 months. Compared to placebo, treatment group had significantly higher bone density and lower bone turnover markers till 5 years after the last infusion [113].

In a meta-analysis evaluating the effect of bisphosphonates on bone mineral density in 328 adults with HIV infection from 8 randomized controlled trials (5 with alendronate and 3 with ZA as the intervention), a significant increase in BMD at the lumbar spine and hip was observed in the treatment groups at 48 and 96 weeks. However, these studies were not long enough to detect the impact of bisphosphonates on fracture risk [114]. ZA has also been shown to be effective in preventing ARV induced bone loss after a single infusion [115].

These studies confirm that both alendronate and ZA are effective in improving BMD in the HIV-infected population, with early studies showing a beneficial effect of ZA in mitigating ARV-induced bone loss as well. DXA may be repeated 1 to 2 years after initiation of osteoporosis therapy and less often subsequently if BMD is stable to improved [116].

Although these studies show significant improvement in bone density with treatment, longitudinal data on fracture reduction with these medications in the HIV-infected population are not available. Additionally, these patients have onset of osteoporosis at a younger age and the need for osteoporosis treatment needs to be assessed carefully before initiating treatment. There are other medications available for the treatment of osteoporosis in the non-HIV population such as raloxifene, teriparatide and denosumab, but no randomized controlled studies of these agents are available in the HIV-infected population.

Summary

The advent of highly potent antiretroviral therapy capable of early and prolonged viral suppression in HIV-infected patients has resulted in significant increases in life span. As we have already seen, this will likely lead to a rising incidence of various metabolic complications of HIV and ARV, including hyperlipidemia and diabetes with associated cardiovascular disease risk. A keen awareness of these potential complications, drug interactions, and possible toxicities will be paramount to their successful management. Appropriate care of HIV-infected individuals going forward will likely require multidisciplinary collaboration as the epidemic evolves to allow our patients to live not only longer, but healthier lives.

Corresponding author: Lisa M. Chirch, MD, UCONN Health, Farmington, CT 06030, [email protected].

Financial disclosures: None

Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to this article

From the University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT.

Abstract

• Objective: To review the metabolic complications of HIV infection.
• Methods: Review of the literature in the context of 3 clinical cases.
• Results: People with HIV infection are living longer thanks to the advent of potent antiretroviral therapy. This has led to increased incidence of age-related metabolic complications, including a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, hyperlipidemia, metabolic syndrome, and osteoporosis. Appropriate management of these complications requires an understanding of disease-related and drug-related side effects as well as the potential for drug-drug interactions. A multidisciplinary approach to patient management is most effective.
• Conclusion: Awareness of the metabolic complications frequently encountered in HIV infection, drug interactions, and possible toxicities is critical to the successful management of HIV-infected individuals.

Key words: HIV; antiretroviral therapy; hyperlipidemia; metabolic syndrome; diabetes; hypogonadism.

According to the most recent data from the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), 36 million people worldwide are living with HIV/AIDS, with 18 million accessing effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) [1]. The past 2 decades have witnessed enormous advances in the field from prevention to diagnosis and therapeutics, and modern ART largely allows HIV-infected persons to live near-normal life spans [2,3]. However, from the beginning of the epidemic, HIV-infected persons on effective therapy have suffered from myriad metabolic consequences, many of which affect quality of life and result in excess mortality [4]. It is also true that untreated HIV infection portends an increased risk of metabolic complications, likely related to abnormal immune activation, as demonstrated in structured interruption trials [5,6]. It is worth noting, however, that while many of these metabolic dyscrasias and associated risks have historically been attributed primarily to the treatment of HIV infection with ART, data from cohort studies and randomized clinical trials have repeatedly demonstrated significant reductions in morbidity and mortality when ART is initiated early [7]. In this paper, we review HIV-related metabolic complications frequently encountered in clinical practice (hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and bone disease) and best practice considerations in the context of 3 clinical cases.

Case Patient 1

Initial Presentation and History

A 58-year-old male with a history of hypertension and mixed hyperlipidemia is referred for evaluation of newly diagnosed HIV infection. He has no history of intravenous drug use but has had multiple male and female sex partners in the past few years, and requested testing after a partner tested positive. His last negative test was 2 years ago. The patient does not smoke cigarettes. Overall he feels well and tolerates his regimen of lisinopril 10 mg and simvastatin 20 mg daily. On initial evaluation, his exam is unremarkable other than subtle white plaques on the dorsal surface of the tongue and buccal mucosa, and moderate central obesity. Vital signs including blood pressure are normal. Initial laboratory evaluation reveals a CD4 cell count of 150 cells/mm³ and an HIV RNA level of 200,000 copies/mL. Fasting serum total cholesterol is 220 mg/dL, triglycerides 250 mg/dL, LDL 170 mg/dL, and HDL 35 mg/dL. Serum BUN, creatinine, and liver function testing results are normal.

• What initial regimen might be recommended based on the status of his HIV infection and comorbidities?

The most recent iteration of the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) guidelines on use of antiretroviral agents (ARVs) in HIV recommends an initial ART regimen that includes a backbone of 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), generally tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or tenofovir alafenamide, abacavir (ABC), emtricitabine (FTC), or lamivudine (3TC) [2]. To this backbone should be added a third agent; the majority of those currently recommended are integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) (dolutegravir, elvitegravir, raltegravir); one recommended protease inhibitor (PI) (ritonavir-boosted darunavir) is also an option. Some of these initial recommended regimens are available as fixed-dosed combinations in 1 pill, making them attractive options.

The latest guidelines also clearly recommend starting ART in all HIV-infected individuals, irrespective of CD4 count. The patient described above has a very low CD4 count, so there is no question he needs to begin therapy promptly. Given his low CD4 count and relatively high viral load, one may consider a ritonavir-boosted PI as perhaps the most robust option and with a relatively high barrier to resistance development, in contrast to other options. Assuming the patient’s baseline resistance testing reveals a fully sensitive wild-type virus without meaningful resistance mutations, he will begin a regimen of TDF/FTC plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir, 3 pills once daily. Given his low CD4 count (below 200 cells/mm³), he will also need prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, in the form of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) daily. Given the potential for interaction between the boosted PI and simvastatin, his lipid-lowering agent is switched to atorvastatin 10 mg daily.

• What is the association between hyperlipidemia and HIV infection and treatment?

Hyperlipidemia represents a key modifiable risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in HIV-infected individuals [8]. Indeed, a multicenter cross-sectional study of older HIV-infected individuals performed in Spain revealed a 54% prevalence of dyslipidemia and 23% CVD [9]. Most experts believe that metabolic abnormalities observed in HIV-infected individuals are the result of a combination of factors: those resulting from abnormal immune activation and inflammation related to viral replication, and those related to certain ARVs [10].

Early after HIV seroconversion, decline in HDL is one of the first proatherogenic changes observed. This, along with increased triglyceride and LDL levels, likely contribute to increased risk of CVD in this population. Increased microbial translocation, evidenced by increased levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), may drive immune activation, leading to dyslipidemia via a multitude of hypothesized mechanisms [4]. It has been theorized that HDL lipoproteins are less stable on ART, leading to potentially impaired plasma lipolytic activities or hepatic cholesteryl ester uptake [6,11]. Increased VLDL from release of free fatty acids may lead to higher triglyceride levels and triglyceride-rich LDL and HDL, all associated with increased risk of CVD [11].

In terms of effects of specific ARV classes, although newer agents have less of a propensity to cause dyslipidemia, the PI class arguably remains most problematic. In comparison to other classes, the PIs tend to result in greater increases in triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL, and have frequent drug-drug interactions with lipid-lowering agents [10,12]. Estimated prevalence of dyslipidemia in patients receiving PI therapy varies from 28% to 80% [13]. The prospective multinational cohort Data collection on Adverse events of Anti-HIV Drugs (DAD) study found significantly higher rates of hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, and low HDL in patients on PIs in comparison to non–nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) [14]. Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain the PIs adverse effects on lipids, including inhibition of lipogenesis and adipocyte differentiation, decreased hepatocyte clearance of chylomicrons and VLDL, and increased hepatic synthesis of triglycerides [15]. Of the available PIs, atazanavir and darunavir have less potential to lead to dyslipidemia [10], while lopinavir/ritonavir, fosamprenavir, and tipranavir may have the highest [13]. Of the NNRTIs, efavirenz is most frequently associated with dyslipidemia, specifically increased triglycerides and total cholesterol [13]. However, these increased values seen on efavirenz therapy may be offset by relative increases in HDL, with little resultant effect on the total cholesterol:HDL ratio. Rilpivirine, etravirine, and nevirapine are relatively less likely to drive lipid changes, although certain drug interactions are important to recognize in clinical practice, such as the interaction between rilpivirine and proton pump inhibitors [2,13,16]. It is also worth noting that no NNRTIs are included in current guidelines as preferred therapy [2].

Historically, the thymidine analogue NRTIs (stavudine, didanosine, zidovudine) have been associated with lipid dyscrasias and lipoatrophy, but fortunately these are no longer used frequenty except in cases requiring deep salvage therapy for highly treatment-experienced patients. Two newer NRTIs, tenofovir and abacavir, have relatively neutral to favorable effects on lipids. The combination of tenofovir disoproxil (TDF) and emtricitabine (trade name Truvada) was associated with significantly lower triglycerides, total cholesterol and LDL than other NRTI pairs [6]. TDF has been postulated to have lipid-lowering effects. Switch studies in which patients were taken off thymidine analogues and placed on TDF, demonstrated recovery of limb fat in patients with lipoatrophy, and those switched off abacavir-based ART to TDF showed statistically significant lower fasting total cholesterol at week 12, without differences of viral suppression [8]. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a next-generation prodrug of tenofovir that results in improved stability in plasma and higher intracellular levels in comparison to TDF [17]. Although randomized controlled trials of TAF vs TDF-based ARV regimens have suggested statistically higher total cholesterol, serum HDL is also increased resulting in unchanged total:HDL ratios and no differences in risk classifications [18]. Integrase inhibitors (INSTI) now represent first-line therapy in combination with an NRTI backbone, and since their availability in 2007 have been evaluated in comparison to various PIs and NNRTIs. Both raltegravir and dolutegravir have consistently shown broad neutral effects on lipids and are among the most metabolically friendly agents available [19–21]. Because it is given in fixed-dose combination with non-ritonavir pharmacologic booster cobicistat, elvitegravir has effects similar to ritonavir-boosted PIs on lipids [6].

• What are management considerations in the treatment of hyperlipidemia in HIV-infected patients?

Patients with HIV and hyperlipidemia may benefit from lipid-lowering therapy in addition to ART, although in certain cases appropriate switches may make a difference. Careful consideration of drug interactions between ARVs and lipid-lowering agents, in addition to ARV history and known drug resistance, is warranted prior to selecting a regimen in these patients. In addition, the latest American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines suggest evaluating 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) using the pooled cohort equation to determine the type and dose of statin required (moderate vs high intensity) [22]. It is noteworthy that HIV infection and its therapies are not taken into account as potential risk factors in this model. Primary prevention in non-diabetic patients with a statin is recommended for patients with a 10-year absolute risk of ≥ 7.5% [22]. This patient’s risk is estimated at between 12% and 13% based on this equation, so primary prevention with a moderate-or high-intensity statin is recommended (Table 1) [23]. Data from more than 80,000 patients in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) showed that HIV-infected patients with no baseline ASCVD had 50% increased risk of acute myocardial infarction when compared to HIV-uninfected patients over 6 years of follow-up [24]. Thus, consideration of the virus itself or its therapy as an additional risk factor may be valid.

Screening and Monitoring of Hyperlipidemia

The most recent iteration of the DHHS primary care guidelines for the management of HIV-infected individuals recommends obtaining fasting (ideally 12 hours) lipid profiles upon initiation of care, and within 1 to 3 months of beginning therapy [12,13]. These initial levels, along with other elements of the patient’s history and calculation of risk may help determine whether lipid-lowering therapy is indicated, and if so, which therapy would be best. In general, after regimen switches or additions of either ARV or statin therapy, repeating fasting lipid levels 6 weeks later is recommended to gauge the effects of the switch. This is especially critical when interactions between ARVs and lipid-lowering therapies are possible. Some experts recommend performing annual screening of patients with normal baseline lipids or with well-controlled hyperlipidemia on therapy. Assessment of 10-year ASCVD risk is also recommended annually, in addition to baseline risk assessment, to determine the need and appropriateness of statin therapy [25]. The question of primary prevention in HIV has yet to be definitively answered. Small studies in this population have demonstrated that statins have the potential to slow progression of carotid intima media thickness and reduce noncalcified plaque volume [24]. An NIH/AIDS Clinical Trial Group–sponsored randomized clinical trial (“REPRIEVE”) is currently underway to address this question. More than 6000 HIV-infected men and women with no history of ASCVD at 100 sites in several countries are enrolled to assess the benefit of pitavastatin as primary prevention in this risk group [24]. Metabolized via glucuronidation primarily, as opposed to cytochrome p450 (CYP 3A4 isoenzyme), pitavastatin is thought to have fewer drug interactions with ARVs in general [6] (Table 2).

Relevant Drug-Drug Interactions

Deciding which statin to begin in HIV-infected patients depends on whether moderate- or high-intensity therapy is warranted and whether the potential for drug interaction with ARVs exists. Table 2 [6,12] depicts available statins and the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction with the primary ARV classes. Simvastatin and lovastatin are heavily metabolized via the CYP 3A4 pathway, resulting in the highest potential risk of interaction with CYP 3A4 inhibitors, such as the PIs, or inducers (eg, NNRTIs, in particular efavirenz) [6]. The former may inhibit metabolism of these statins, resulting in increased risk of toxicity, while co-administration with efavirenz, for example, may result in inadequate serum concentration and therefore inadequate lipid-lowering effects. Although less lipophilic, atorvastatin results in similar interactions with PIs and NNRTIs, and therefore low starting doses with close monitoring is recommended [6]. Fewer interactions have been noted with rosuvastatin, pravastatin, and pitavastatin, as these do not require CYP 3A4 for their metabolism and are thus less likely to be affected by ARVs. These therefore represent potentially safer first choices for certain patients on ARVs, although of these, only rosuvastatin is classified as a high-intensity statin [22,23] (Table 1). When compared directly to pravastatin 40 mg daily in patients receiving ritonavir-boosted PIs, rosuvastatin performed superiorly at 10 mg per day, resulting in more significant reductions in LDL and triglyceride levels [15]. Although it is eliminated largely unchanged through the kidney and liver, pravastatin has been reported to idiosyncratically interact with darunavir, resulting in potentially increased pravastatin levels and associated toxicity [25]. Treatment of pure hypertriglyceridemia in HIV-infected patients should begin with fibrates, which have little to no risk of interaction with most clinically relevant ARVs [6,10]. Alternatives to lower triglycerides include niacin and N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids [25].

Case 1 Continued

The patient has an impressive response to his initial regimen of TDF/FTC plus boosted darunavir, with repeat CD4 count after 12 weeks of 275 (18%) cells/mm³ and an undetectable viral load (< 20 copies/mL). Other lab parameters are favorable and he is tolerating the regimen well without notable side effects. However, at his next visit, although his viral load remains undetectable, his triglyceride level has increased to 350 mg/dL, although other lipid parameters are comparable to the prior result. He complains of diffuse body aches, concentrated in large muscle groups of the extremities, and dark-colored urine. A creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level is elevated at 300 IU/L (normal, 22–269, negative MB fraction). Serum creatinine is 1.4 mg/dL (had been 1.1 mg/dL at baseline). Given he has done so well otherwise on these ARVs, he is reluctant to make any changes.

• What drug-drug interaction is most likely causing this patient's problem, and how should it be managed?

This scenario is not uncommon in clinical practice, and changes to regimens are sometimes necessary in order to avoid drug interactions. Care must be taken to thoroughly review antiretroviral history and available resistance testing (in this case a relatively short history) in order to ensure a fully active and suppressive regimen is chosen. This description could be the result of an interaction between lipid-lowering therapy and ARVs resulting in increased relative concentrations of one drug or the other and therefore leading to toxicity. Given this possibility, and suboptimal control of hyperlipidemia, consideration should be given to switching both his ART and his statin therapy.

Safety and Potential Toxicities of Lipid-Lowering Therapy

Increased serum concentration of certain statins when co-administered with CYP 3A4 inhibitors like the PIs leads to heightened risk of statin-associated toxicities. In general, this includes muscle inflammation, leading to increases in serum CPK level and associated symptoms, including myalgias, myositis, or in extreme cases, rhabdomyolysis [6]. Although rare, this toxicity can be serious and may lead to acute renal injury if not recognized and managed appropriately. In theory, the potential for statin-associated hepatotoxicity may also be increased in patients receiving PIs, although this has not been borne out in clinical trials [26]. In fact, quite the opposite may be true, in that statins have been shown to improve liver function in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection and with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [6,15].

Case 1 Conclusion

The patient does well on his new ARV regimen of TAF/FTC and dolutegravir, 2 pills once daily. He no longer requires TMP/SMX, as his CD4 count has been reliably above 200 cells/mm³ on several occasions. Serum creatinine is back down to baseline and CPK has normalized. Fasting lipids have improved since the switch, and he no longer has symptoms of myositis on rosuvastatin 10 mg daily.

Summary

Consideration of statin therapy is complicated by potential drug interactions with ARVs and associated toxicity. However, given known effects of ARVs on lipids, and of immune activation and inflammation related to the virus itself, these patients should be carefully evaluated for statin therapy for their anti-inflammatory and immune modulatory effects as much as for their lipid-lowering ability. Utilization of HIV infection and its therapies as additional cardiovascular risk factors when calculating 10-year risk deserves further consideration; forthcoming results of the REPRIEVE trial are certain to contribute valuable information to this field of study.

Case Patient 2

Initial Presentation and History

A 45-year-old female with history of HIV infection since 2008 presents to the office for new-onset diabetes, diagnosed 2 weeks ago. She has had symptoms of polyuria and polydipsia for the last 1 month. She denies diarrhea, nausea, vomiting or weight loss. She is currently on a regimen consisting of zidovudine/lamivudine plus lopinavir/ritonavir. There is no family history of diabetes. Her examination is unremarkable, including normal vital signs (weight 150 lb, blood pressure 114/70, heart rate 76) and no evidence of insulin resistance, including acanthosis nigricans or striae. Glycosylated hemoglobin level (HbA1c) is 8%. Creatinine and liver function tests are within reference ranges.

• Do HIV-infected patients have a higher incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM)?

Prevalence of type 2 DM in HIV-infected patients varies between 2% to 14% [27]. This variation is due to the different cutoffs used for diagnosis, differences in cohorts studied, and how risk factors are analyzed [28–31]. In a recent nationally representative estimate of DM prevalence among HIV-infected adults receiving medical care in the United States in 2009–2010, the prevalence of DM was noted to be 10.3%. In comparison to the general adult US population, HIV-infected individuals have a 3.8% higher prevalence of DM after adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, poverty-level, obesity, and HCV infection [27].

There is controversy over whether HIV infection itself increases the risk of type 2 DM, with some studies showing increased risk [28,32,33] and others showing no independent effect or an inverse effect [30,34,35]. Studies on the impact of ethnicity and race on prevalence of DM are limited [36].

Certain traditional risk factors (age, ethnicity, obesity) are still responsible for most of the increased risk of diabetes in the HIV-infected population [35,37]. HIV infection itself is associated with metabolic dysfunction, independent of ARV. In HIV-infected patients, impaired glucose metabolism is associated with altered levels of adipokines, increased adiponectin and soluble-tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNFR1) and decreased leptin [38,39]. HIV-associated alterations in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell function also impair glycolysis, which may adversely impact glucose metabolism [40].

Other contributing factors in HIV-infected patients are HCV co-infection [41], medications (atypical antipsychotics, corticosteroids), opiates, and low testosterone [42]. HCV co-infection may lead to hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis, and increasing insulin resistance.

Recent genomic studies show several common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with diabetes in the general population. In the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, SNPs accounted for 14% of type 2 DM risk variability, whereas ARV exposure accounted for 3% and age for 19% of the variability in DM [43].

ARVs also increase the risk of type 2 DM by both direct and indirect effects. Certain ARVs causes lipoatrophy [30] and visceral fat accumulation/lipohypertrophy [29,44]. PIs increase insulin resistance via effects on GLUT-4 transporter and decrease insulin secretion through effects on B cell function [45]. NRTIs (eg, stavudine, zidovudine and didanosine) can cause direct mitochondrial toxicity [46–48]. Utilization of newer ARV agents has decreased the prevalence of severe lipoatrophy, but lipohypertrophy and the underlying metabolic abnormalities persist. The DHHS “preferred” nucleoside analogues, tenofovir and abacavir, do not induce mitochondrial toxicity and have more favorable metabolic profiles [49,50]. In ACTG Study 5142, thymidine-sparing regimens were found to cause less lipoatrophy [51]. In addition, darunavir and atazanavir, the preferred and alternative PIs and the integrase strand transfer inhibitor have limited or modest impact on insulin sensitivity [20,52,53]. This has led to a recent decline in the incidence of type 2 DM in HIV-infected patients.

Statins can also increase insulin resistance and DM [54], although studies have shown mixed results [55–57]. The benefits of statin therapy likely outweigh the risk of DM since there is a significant cardiovascular event reduction with their use [58,59].

• How is diabetes diagnosed in HIV-infected patients?

Optimal diabetes screening guidelines have not been established specifically for HIV-infected patients. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines recommend that diabetes in the general population be diagnosed by 2 elevated fasting blood glucose levels, HbA1c, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), or high random glucose with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia [60]. Repeat testing is recommended every 3 years. The OGTT is recommended for diagnosis in pregnant women.

HbA1c may underestimate glycemic burden in HIV-infected individual due to higher mean corpuscular volume, NRTI use (specifically abacavir), or lower CD4 count [61–65]. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 2013 primary care guidelines for HIV-infected patients recommends obtaining a fasting glucose and/or HbA1c prior to and within 1–3 months after starting ARV [12]. Use of HbA1c threshold cutoff of 5.8% for the diagnosis of DM and testing every 6–12 months are recommended.

• How should this patient’s diabetes be managed?

The ADA guidelines suggest a patient-centered approach to management of diabetes [66]. All patients should be educated about lifestyle modifications with medical nutrition therapy and moderate-intensity aerobic activity and weight loss [67]. If a patient is on lopinavir/ritonavir or a thymidine analogue (zidovudine, stavudine), one should consider switching the ARV regimen [2].

There are currently no randomized controlled trials of diabetes treatment specific to patients with HIV infection. Metformin is the first-line agent. It improves insulin sensitivity by reducing hepatic glucose production and improving peripheral glucose uptake and lipid parameters [68,69]. Other oral hypoglycemic agents used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes are shown in Table 3.

Case 2 Continued

The patient is switched to TAF/FTC plus dolutegravir with improvement in blood sugars. She is also started on metformin. Co-administration of metformin and dolutegravir will be carefully monitored since dolutegravir increases metformin concentration [70]. When dolutegravir is used with metformin, the total daily dose of metformin should be limited to 1000 mg.

• How should this patient be followed?

If the patient is still not at goal HbAb1c at follow-up, there are multiple other treatment options, including use of insulin. Goal HbA1c for most patients with type 2 DM is < 7%; however, this goal should be individualized for each patient in accordance with the ADA guidelines [12]. A longitudinal cohort study of 11,346 veterans with type 2 diabetes compared the glycemic effectiveness of oral diabetic medications ( metformin, sulfonylurea and a thiazolidinedione) among veterans with and without HIV infection. This study did not find any significant difference in HbA1c based on different diabetes medications. However the HBA1c reduction was less in black and Hispanic patients. The mechanism for the poorer response among these patients need to be evaluated further [71]. In addition to management of blood sugar, other CVD risk factors, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, smoking, etc, should be assessed and managed aggressively.

Case Patient 3

Initial Presentation and History

A 45-year-old male with a history of HIV infection diagnosed 10 years ago, on TDF/FTC/efavirenz (trade name Atripla) for the last 7 years, presents with a left femoral neck fracture after he missed the pavement and fell on his left hip. His history is significant for IV drug abuse for 10 years prior to diagnosis of HIV, and he has been on methadone for the last 6 years.

• Is HIV infection associated with increased prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis and increased risk of fractures?

With recent advancements in antiretroviral therapy and improved survival of the HIV-infected population, osteoporosis and increased fracture risk have become important causes of morbidity and mortality. Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength, which predisposes to an increased risk of fracture. The World Health Organization defines osteoporosis as a bone mineral density (BMD) measurement by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, hip, or forearm that is more than 2.5 standard deviations below that of a "young normal" adult (T-score < –2.5) or a history of one or more fragility fractures. Fragility fractures result from mechanical forces that would not ordinarily result in fracture, such as fall from standing height [40]. Osteopenia is characterized by low BMD (T-score between –1.0 and –2.5) and can be a precursor to osteoporosis.

Several observational, retrospective, and prospective studies have shown lower bone density and an increased risk of fractures in the HIV-infected population compared to age-, race- and sex-matched HIV-negative adults. In a large meta-analysis of pooled prevalence data on 884 HIV-infected patients compared with 654 HIV-uninfected age- and sex-matched controls [72], overall, HIV-infected patients had a significant 6.4-fold increased odds of reduced BMD and a 3.7-fold increased odds of osteoporosis compared to the control population. This meta-analysis also compared ARV-treated subjects to ARV-naive subjects and showed that ARV-treated subjects (n = 824) had a higher prevalence of reduced BMD compared with ARV-naive subjects (n= 202; odds ratio 2.5, 95% CI 1.8–3.7). The odds of osteoporosis was increased 2.4 times (95% CI 1.2 – 4.8) in ARV-treated subjects compared with ARV-naive subjects. None of the studies adjusted for potentially important confounding factors, such as age or duration of HIV infection. PI-treated patients (n = 791) were also found to have a higher prevalence of reduced BMD compared with PI-untreated patients (n = 410; OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1–2.0). The odds of osteoporosis in PI-treated patients (n = 666) was also 1.6-fold greater (95% CI 1.1–2.3) than those not treated with PI (n = 367).

Low bone density has also been reported in HIV- positive premenopausal women irrespective of ARV status. In a recent study of 89 premenopausal women (mean age, 37 years) predominantly of African origin with HIV infection, osteopenia and osteoporosis were prevalent in one-third of these women, irrespective of ARV use and were associated with low BMI [73]. In a sub-study of the INSIGHT trial evaluating prevalence of and risk factors for low BMD in untreated HIV infection, performed at several sites across 6 continents involving 424 subjects, osteopenia was present in a third of this relatively young predominantly non-white ART-naive population (mean age 34 + 10 years) with normal CD4 cell counts, while only 2% had osteoporosis. Factors independently associated with lower BMD at the hip and spine were female sex, Latino/Hispanic ethnicity, lower BMI, and higher estimated glomerular filtration rate. Longer duration of HIV infection was also associated with lower hip BMD. Current or nadir CD4 cell count and HIV viral load were not associated with low BMD [74].

Many studies have reported increased fracture prevalence in the HIV population. In a retrospective study of fracture prevalence in a large US health care system, a significantly higher rate of fractures was reported in HIV-infected men and women compared to non-HIV-infected controls (2.87 vs. 1.77 fractures per 100 persons, P < 0.001). The difference in the increased fracture prevalence was greater in HIV positive men compared to women (3.08 vs. 1.83; P < 0.001). Vertebral, wrist and hip fractures were more prevalent in men compared to vertebral and wrist fractures only in women. Fracture prevalence was higher in both Caucasian females and males and only in African-American women [75].

In the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) [76], age-adjusted fracture rates in the HIV population were noted to be 1.98 to 3.69 times higher than rates in the general population. The HOPS was an open prospective cohort study of HIV-infected adults who were followed at 10 US HIV clinics. Rates of first fractures at any anatomic site from 2000–2008 were assessed among 5826 active HOPS patients (median age 40 years, 79% male, 52% Caucasian, and 73% exposed to ART). Among persons aged 25–54 years, both fracture rates and relative proportion of fragility fractures were higher among HOPS patients than among outpatient controls. Older age, substance abuse, nadir CD4+ cell count <200 cells/mm, HCV infection and DM were associated with incident fractures [76].

• What factors contribute to poor bone health in the HIV population?

Several factors that contribute to low bone density are present at a higher rate in the HIV population (Table 4). These include poor nutritional status in terms of suboptimal calcium and vitamin D intake, hypogonadism, low body weight, and alcohol, tobacco and substance abuse.

Vitamin D deficiency is very common in HIV-infected patients, with a prevalence of up to 60% to 75% [77]. Hypogonadism is also relatively common among HIV population [78], contributing to lower bone density. Co-infection with HCV is also associated with increased risk of fractures. In a large cohort of Medicaid beneficiaries, a significant increase in the risk of hip fracture was demonstrated in HCV/HIV co-infected subjects compared either with HCV mono-infected, HIV mono-infected or non-infected individuals [79]. In another large database study, a significantly higher risk of osteoporotic fracture (closed wrist, vertebral or hip fracture) was reported in HCV/HIV co-infected versus HIV mono-infected individuals [80] with fracture rates of 2.57 and 2.07/1000 patient-years (P < 0.001). Dual treatment for HIV/hepatitis B co-infection has also been shown to be associated with a higher risk of hip fracture compared to treatment of HIV mono-infected individuals [81].

HIV infection itself can increase bone loss and reduce bone formation through direct effects related to the HIV antigen load or indirect effects related to activation of the pro-inflammatory cytokines resulting in bone resorption and loss [82]. Co-infection with HCV and/or hepatitis B also contributes to lower bone density in this population. Certain ARVs may also contribute to low bone density in the HIV population. Lipoatrophy related to HIV may also mediate bone loss through complex relationship between central signaling of adipocyte hormones [82,83].

Direct Viral Effects

Several HIV viral proteins have been shown to promote osteoclast activity (vpr and gp120), suppress osteoblast activity (p55-gag) and increase osteoblast apoptosis [84], resulting in increased bone resorption and reduced bone formation, leading to low bone mass. High HIV RNA viral load and T-cell activation are also associated with elevated levels of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), which results in osteoclast formation and increased bone resorption [85]. Other endogenous physiological inhibitors of osteoclastogenesis such as osteoprotegrin and interferon-γ levels are also remarkably downregulated in advanced HIV infection, resulting in increased bone resorption [86]. At a cellular level, HIV proteins including Tat and Nef reduce the number of available mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) precursors that proliferate into osteoblasts by inducing MSC senescence, due to increased oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction resulting in reduced proliferation of osteoblasts and lower rates of bone formation [87]. Collectively, these mechanisms result in significant uncoupling of bone formation and resorption, resulting in less bone formation and greater rate of bone loss and lower bone density.

Pro-inflammatory Pathways

Cytokines and other soluble immune factors play a major role in the physiology of osteoblast maturation and osteoclastic bone resorption [88,89]. Immune dysfunction and persistent inflammation in HIV result in increased levels of several inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and RANKL, resulting in stimulation of osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption [90]. Due to a disruption between T and B cells in HIV and decreased osteoprotegrin (OPG) production and increased RANKL level, RANKL/OPG ratio is elevated, favoring osteoclastogenesis [91].

• Is antiretroviral therapy associated with bone loss?

The initiation of ART has been reported to cause 2% to 6% bone loss irrespective of the regimen used, similar to that sustained in the first 2 years after menopause [92]. Certain NRTIs and PIs are associated with higher rates of bone loss than others. TDF has been associated most commonly with decreased bone mineral density, which usually stabilizes with continued use [93]. In a randomized trial comparing 4 treatment arms of ABC/3TC or TDF/FTC with EFV or ATV/ritonavir, TDF was associated with a greater reduction in BMD compared to abacavir-based regimens [94]. The likely cause of this may be TDF-mediated renal toxicity, including proximal tubular dysfunction and hypophosphatemia, resulting in increased PTH and bone resorption, and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus [95]. TAF is another prodrug of tenofovir diphosphate associated with less renal and bone toxicity compared with TDF. TAF has been associated with significantly less decrease in bone mineral density and renal dysfunction in randomized studies compared to regimen using TDF [17]. Vitamin D deficiency and hypophosphatemia associated with TDF therapy may present with osteomalacia, which predisposes to bone pain and fractures. Treatment with TDF may rarely be associated with the development of Fanconi syndrome and osteomalacia [96]. BMD is often severely reduced and bone pain and pathological fractures are characteristic features. Certain PI regimens containing ritonavir-boosted atazanavir have also been associated with greater bone loss in the spine than the hip, compared to efavirenz-containing regimens [97].

The universal bone loss associated with ART is thought to be a result of the "immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome" (IRIS). This occurs as a result of rapid improvement in immune function after the commencement of ARV as a result of systemic or local inflammation, resulting in increased levels of cytokines that may contribute to bone loss. This has been shown in animal studies where T cell transplantation into immunocompromised mice to mimic ARV-induced T-cell expansion resulted in increased RANKL and TNF-α production by B cells and/or T cells, accompanied by enhanced bone resorption and BMD loss. When TNF-α or RANKL-null T-cells or TNF-α antagonists were used instead, the loss of cortical bone was prevented [98]. In a prospective study evaluating changes in bone turnover markers and inflammatory cytokines with ARV therapy in HIV infected subjects, a significant increase in bone resorption markers, RANKL and TNF-α were seen after initiation of ARV. The magnitude of CD4-cell recovery correlated with the increase in markers of bone resorption [99], suggesting that recovery of the immune system contributes to the increase in cytokine-mediated bone resorption.

• How is bone health and fracture risk assessed in the HIV-positive population?

The predictive value of low BMD for fracture risk assessment in the HIV-positive population has not been established. In the absence of definitive data, the fracture risk assessment and standard methods of measuring bone density using DXA are utilized. In a large study of 1000 men and women, osteoporosis defined as a BMD T-score –2.5 as measured by DXA, was associated with a significantly increased risk of incident fractures but was not a good predictor of morphometric vertebral fractures [100]. In the absence of prospective longitudinal studies evaluating the bone density parameters at which fracture risk is significantly increased in the HIV population, it is reasonable to follow the guidelines used in the non-HIV population.

The approach to treatment of osteopenia and osteoporosis is similar to that in non HIV-infected population and is directed at lifestyle changes and treatment of secondary causes of osteoporosis [101], followed by initiation of antiresorptive therapy.

Management of Bone Disease

There are several guidelines available for the management of bone disease in the HIV population. The most recent guidelines from the IDSA [12] recommend assessing the risk of fragility fracture using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), without DXA, in all HIV-infected men aged 40–49 years and HIV-infected premenopausal women aged ≥ 40 years. DXA should be performed in men aged ≥ 50 years, postmenopausal women, patients with a history of fragility fracture, patients receiving chronic glucocorticoid treatment, and patients at high risk of falls. In resource-limited settings, FRAX without bone mineral density can be substituted for DXA. ART guidelines should be followed. TDF and boosted PIs should be avoided if possible in at-risk patients. Dietary and lifestyle management strategies for high-risk patients should be employed and anti-osteoporosis treatment initiated if indicated [102].

The FRAX tool is available at www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/ and is used to calculate 10-year fracture risk using patient clinical data, including presence of risk factors for osteoporosis. The tool is population-specific by race and region. It has not been validated for the HIV-positive population and may underestimate fracture risk [103]. HIV status is considered a secondary cause of osteoporosis in FRAX calculation.

The National Osteoporosis Foundation recommends screening with DXA for all women > 65 years of age, all men > 70 years of age, and adults > 50 years of age with additional risk factors for osteoporosis. Evaluation for secondary causes for low BMD should always be considered in the HIV-positive population including evaluation of calcium and vitamin D intake. Laboratory testing may include complete blood count, calcium, phosphate, albumin, creatinine, PTH, 25 hydroxy vitamin D (25,OHD) and 24 hour urine for evaluation of calcium, creatinine and phosphate (especially if on TDF) excretion. Testosterone level can be checked in men and estradiol, prolactin, FSH and LH in women for evaluation of hypogonadism. Bone turnover markers (bone specific alkaline phosphatase and serum C-terminal telopeptide) can also be assessed at baseline.

Studies using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HSPQCT) have shown significant reductions in tibial trabecular bone density and trabecular number in pre-menopausal and postmenopausal HIV-infected women [104], with reduced bone stiffness measured using finite element analysis [105]. Co-infection with HCV is also associated with significantly lower trabecular volumetric BMD and smaller cortical dimensions in the tibia, compared to healthy subjects [106]. HSPQCT is not widely available for clinical use at this time. Lateral imaging of the spine or vertebral morphometric analysis may be done in cases of height loss to assess for occult vertebral compression fractures.

There is a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the HIV-infected population [107]. Treatment goal is to have a vitamin D level of at least 30 ng/mL, based on Endocrine Society practice guidelines [108], and may require supplementation with 1000–2000 units of vitamin D daily. Calcium intake should be optimized, averaging 1000 mg per day including diet and supplements, to be taken in divided amounts through the day for optimal absorption. Secondary causes of low bone density as mentioned in Table 4 should also be addressed. Patients should be counseled on tobacco and alcohol abuse. Corticosteroids should be dosed at the lowest dose needed. Medications such as proton pump inhibitors can impair the absorption of calcium carbonate, in which case calcium citrate supplements should be used if there is suboptimal calcium intake in the diet.

• Which medications have been shown to be effective in treatment of osteoporosis in the HIV population?

Bisphosphonates are the mainstay of therapy for osteoporosis in the HIV-infected population. Only alendronate and zoledronate have substantial evidence of safety and effectiveness in the HIV-infected population, but these studies have been small and of limited duration.

Bisphosphonates are pyrophosphate analogues that inhibit bone resorption by binding to the hydroxyapatite crystals in the bone. Several prospective studies have shown alendronate to increase bone density compared to calcium and vitamin D alone in the HIV infected patients with reduced bone density [109,110], with significant reduction in markers of bone resorption [111].

Zoledronic acid (ZA), an amino-bisphosphonate which is infused intravenously, has also been used in smaller studies in HIV-infected persons. In a prospective study evaluating yearly ZA infusion to biennial ZA infusion in subjects with HIV and low bone density [112], biennial ZA infusions were found to be effective in improving and maintaining bone density in the HIV population. In another prospective study evaluating the effects of ZA in HIV-positive men, ZA infusion was given at baseline and at 12 months. Compared to placebo, treatment group had significantly higher bone density and lower bone turnover markers till 5 years after the last infusion [113].

In a meta-analysis evaluating the effect of bisphosphonates on bone mineral density in 328 adults with HIV infection from 8 randomized controlled trials (5 with alendronate and 3 with ZA as the intervention), a significant increase in BMD at the lumbar spine and hip was observed in the treatment groups at 48 and 96 weeks. However, these studies were not long enough to detect the impact of bisphosphonates on fracture risk [114]. ZA has also been shown to be effective in preventing ARV induced bone loss after a single infusion [115].

These studies confirm that both alendronate and ZA are effective in improving BMD in the HIV-infected population, with early studies showing a beneficial effect of ZA in mitigating ARV-induced bone loss as well. DXA may be repeated 1 to 2 years after initiation of osteoporosis therapy and less often subsequently if BMD is stable to improved [116].

Although these studies show significant improvement in bone density with treatment, longitudinal data on fracture reduction with these medications in the HIV-infected population are not available. Additionally, these patients have onset of osteoporosis at a younger age and the need for osteoporosis treatment needs to be assessed carefully before initiating treatment. There are other medications available for the treatment of osteoporosis in the non-HIV population such as raloxifene, teriparatide and denosumab, but no randomized controlled studies of these agents are available in the HIV-infected population.

Summary

The advent of highly potent antiretroviral therapy capable of early and prolonged viral suppression in HIV-infected patients has resulted in significant increases in life span. As we have already seen, this will likely lead to a rising incidence of various metabolic complications of HIV and ARV, including hyperlipidemia and diabetes with associated cardiovascular disease risk. A keen awareness of these potential complications, drug interactions, and possible toxicities will be paramount to their successful management. Appropriate care of HIV-infected individuals going forward will likely require multidisciplinary collaboration as the epidemic evolves to allow our patients to live not only longer, but healthier lives.

Corresponding author: Lisa M. Chirch, MD, UCONN Health, Farmington, CT 06030, [email protected].

Financial disclosures: None

Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to this article

From the University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT.

Abstract

• Objective: To review the metabolic complications of HIV infection.
• Methods: Review of the literature in the context of 3 clinical cases.
• Results: People with HIV infection are living longer thanks to the advent of potent antiretroviral therapy. This has led to increased incidence of age-related metabolic complications, including a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, hyperlipidemia, metabolic syndrome, and osteoporosis. Appropriate management of these complications requires an understanding of disease-related and drug-related side effects as well as the potential for drug-drug interactions. A multidisciplinary approach to patient management is most effective.
• Conclusion: Awareness of the metabolic complications frequently encountered in HIV infection, drug interactions, and possible toxicities is critical to the successful management of HIV-infected individuals.

Key words: HIV; antiretroviral therapy; hyperlipidemia; metabolic syndrome; diabetes; hypogonadism.

According to the most recent data from the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), 36 million people worldwide are living with HIV/AIDS, with 18 million accessing effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) [1]. The past 2 decades have witnessed enormous advances in the field from prevention to diagnosis and therapeutics, and modern ART largely allows HIV-infected persons to live near-normal life spans [2,3]. However, from the beginning of the epidemic, HIV-infected persons on effective therapy have suffered from myriad metabolic consequences, many of which affect quality of life and result in excess mortality [4]. It is also true that untreated HIV infection portends an increased risk of metabolic complications, likely related to abnormal immune activation, as demonstrated in structured interruption trials [5,6]. It is worth noting, however, that while many of these metabolic dyscrasias and associated risks have historically been attributed primarily to the treatment of HIV infection with ART, data from cohort studies and randomized clinical trials have repeatedly demonstrated significant reductions in morbidity and mortality when ART is initiated early [7]. In this paper, we review HIV-related metabolic complications frequently encountered in clinical practice (hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and bone disease) and best practice considerations in the context of 3 clinical cases.

Case Patient 1

Initial Presentation and History

A 58-year-old male with a history of hypertension and mixed hyperlipidemia is referred for evaluation of newly diagnosed HIV infection. He has no history of intravenous drug use but has had multiple male and female sex partners in the past few years, and requested testing after a partner tested positive. His last negative test was 2 years ago. The patient does not smoke cigarettes. Overall he feels well and tolerates his regimen of lisinopril 10 mg and simvastatin 20 mg daily. On initial evaluation, his exam is unremarkable other than subtle white plaques on the dorsal surface of the tongue and buccal mucosa, and moderate central obesity. Vital signs including blood pressure are normal. Initial laboratory evaluation reveals a CD4 cell count of 150 cells/mm³ and an HIV RNA level of 200,000 copies/mL. Fasting serum total cholesterol is 220 mg/dL, triglycerides 250 mg/dL, LDL 170 mg/dL, and HDL 35 mg/dL. Serum BUN, creatinine, and liver function testing results are normal.

• What initial regimen might be recommended based on the status of his HIV infection and comorbidities?

The most recent iteration of the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) guidelines on use of antiretroviral agents (ARVs) in HIV recommends an initial ART regimen that includes a backbone of 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), generally tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or tenofovir alafenamide, abacavir (ABC), emtricitabine (FTC), or lamivudine (3TC) [2]. To this backbone should be added a third agent; the majority of those currently recommended are integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) (dolutegravir, elvitegravir, raltegravir); one recommended protease inhibitor (PI) (ritonavir-boosted darunavir) is also an option. Some of these initial recommended regimens are available as fixed-dosed combinations in 1 pill, making them attractive options.

The latest guidelines also clearly recommend starting ART in all HIV-infected individuals, irrespective of CD4 count. The patient described above has a very low CD4 count, so there is no question he needs to begin therapy promptly. Given his low CD4 count and relatively high viral load, one may consider a ritonavir-boosted PI as perhaps the most robust option and with a relatively high barrier to resistance development, in contrast to other options. Assuming the patient’s baseline resistance testing reveals a fully sensitive wild-type virus without meaningful resistance mutations, he will begin a regimen of TDF/FTC plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir, 3 pills once daily. Given his low CD4 count (below 200 cells/mm³), he will also need prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, in the form of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) daily. Given the potential for interaction between the boosted PI and simvastatin, his lipid-lowering agent is switched to atorvastatin 10 mg daily.

• What is the association between hyperlipidemia and HIV infection and treatment?

Hyperlipidemia represents a key modifiable risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in HIV-infected individuals [8]. Indeed, a multicenter cross-sectional study of older HIV-infected individuals performed in Spain revealed a 54% prevalence of dyslipidemia and 23% CVD [9]. Most experts believe that metabolic abnormalities observed in HIV-infected individuals are the result of a combination of factors: those resulting from abnormal immune activation and inflammation related to viral replication, and those related to certain ARVs [10].

Early after HIV seroconversion, decline in HDL is one of the first proatherogenic changes observed. This, along with increased triglyceride and LDL levels, likely contribute to increased risk of CVD in this population. Increased microbial translocation, evidenced by increased levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), may drive immune activation, leading to dyslipidemia via a multitude of hypothesized mechanisms [4]. It has been theorized that HDL lipoproteins are less stable on ART, leading to potentially impaired plasma lipolytic activities or hepatic cholesteryl ester uptake [6,11]. Increased VLDL from release of free fatty acids may lead to higher triglyceride levels and triglyceride-rich LDL and HDL, all associated with increased risk of CVD [11].

In terms of effects of specific ARV classes, although newer agents have less of a propensity to cause dyslipidemia, the PI class arguably remains most problematic. In comparison to other classes, the PIs tend to result in greater increases in triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL, and have frequent drug-drug interactions with lipid-lowering agents [10,12]. Estimated prevalence of dyslipidemia in patients receiving PI therapy varies from 28% to 80% [13]. The prospective multinational cohort Data collection on Adverse events of Anti-HIV Drugs (DAD) study found significantly higher rates of hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, and low HDL in patients on PIs in comparison to non–nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) [14]. Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain the PIs adverse effects on lipids, including inhibition of lipogenesis and adipocyte differentiation, decreased hepatocyte clearance of chylomicrons and VLDL, and increased hepatic synthesis of triglycerides [15]. Of the available PIs, atazanavir and darunavir have less potential to lead to dyslipidemia [10], while lopinavir/ritonavir, fosamprenavir, and tipranavir may have the highest [13]. Of the NNRTIs, efavirenz is most frequently associated with dyslipidemia, specifically increased triglycerides and total cholesterol [13]. However, these increased values seen on efavirenz therapy may be offset by relative increases in HDL, with little resultant effect on the total cholesterol:HDL ratio. Rilpivirine, etravirine, and nevirapine are relatively less likely to drive lipid changes, although certain drug interactions are important to recognize in clinical practice, such as the interaction between rilpivirine and proton pump inhibitors [2,13,16]. It is also worth noting that no NNRTIs are included in current guidelines as preferred therapy [2].

Historically, the thymidine analogue NRTIs (stavudine, didanosine, zidovudine) have been associated with lipid dyscrasias and lipoatrophy, but fortunately these are no longer used frequenty except in cases requiring deep salvage therapy for highly treatment-experienced patients. Two newer NRTIs, tenofovir and abacavir, have relatively neutral to favorable effects on lipids. The combination of tenofovir disoproxil (TDF) and emtricitabine (trade name Truvada) was associated with significantly lower triglycerides, total cholesterol and LDL than other NRTI pairs [6]. TDF has been postulated to have lipid-lowering effects. Switch studies in which patients were taken off thymidine analogues and placed on TDF, demonstrated recovery of limb fat in patients with lipoatrophy, and those switched off abacavir-based ART to TDF showed statistically significant lower fasting total cholesterol at week 12, without differences of viral suppression [8]. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a next-generation prodrug of tenofovir that results in improved stability in plasma and higher intracellular levels in comparison to TDF [17]. Although randomized controlled trials of TAF vs TDF-based ARV regimens have suggested statistically higher total cholesterol, serum HDL is also increased resulting in unchanged total:HDL ratios and no differences in risk classifications [18]. Integrase inhibitors (INSTI) now represent first-line therapy in combination with an NRTI backbone, and since their availability in 2007 have been evaluated in comparison to various PIs and NNRTIs. Both raltegravir and dolutegravir have consistently shown broad neutral effects on lipids and are among the most metabolically friendly agents available [19–21]. Because it is given in fixed-dose combination with non-ritonavir pharmacologic booster cobicistat, elvitegravir has effects similar to ritonavir-boosted PIs on lipids [6].

• What are management considerations in the treatment of hyperlipidemia in HIV-infected patients?

Patients with HIV and hyperlipidemia may benefit from lipid-lowering therapy in addition to ART, although in certain cases appropriate switches may make a difference. Careful consideration of drug interactions between ARVs and lipid-lowering agents, in addition to ARV history and known drug resistance, is warranted prior to selecting a regimen in these patients. In addition, the latest American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines suggest evaluating 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) using the pooled cohort equation to determine the type and dose of statin required (moderate vs high intensity) [22]. It is noteworthy that HIV infection and its therapies are not taken into account as potential risk factors in this model. Primary prevention in non-diabetic patients with a statin is recommended for patients with a 10-year absolute risk of ≥ 7.5% [22]. This patient’s risk is estimated at between 12% and 13% based on this equation, so primary prevention with a moderate-or high-intensity statin is recommended (Table 1) [23]. Data from more than 80,000 patients in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) showed that HIV-infected patients with no baseline ASCVD had 50% increased risk of acute myocardial infarction when compared to HIV-uninfected patients over 6 years of follow-up [24]. Thus, consideration of the virus itself or its therapy as an additional risk factor may be valid.

Screening and Monitoring of Hyperlipidemia

The most recent iteration of the DHHS primary care guidelines for the management of HIV-infected individuals recommends obtaining fasting (ideally 12 hours) lipid profiles upon initiation of care, and within 1 to 3 months of beginning therapy [12,13]. These initial levels, along with other elements of the patient’s history and calculation of risk may help determine whether lipid-lowering therapy is indicated, and if so, which therapy would be best. In general, after regimen switches or additions of either ARV or statin therapy, repeating fasting lipid levels 6 weeks later is recommended to gauge the effects of the switch. This is especially critical when interactions between ARVs and lipid-lowering therapies are possible. Some experts recommend performing annual screening of patients with normal baseline lipids or with well-controlled hyperlipidemia on therapy. Assessment of 10-year ASCVD risk is also recommended annually, in addition to baseline risk assessment, to determine the need and appropriateness of statin therapy [25]. The question of primary prevention in HIV has yet to be definitively answered. Small studies in this population have demonstrated that statins have the potential to slow progression of carotid intima media thickness and reduce noncalcified plaque volume [24]. An NIH/AIDS Clinical Trial Group–sponsored randomized clinical trial (“REPRIEVE”) is currently underway to address this question. More than 6000 HIV-infected men and women with no history of ASCVD at 100 sites in several countries are enrolled to assess the benefit of pitavastatin as primary prevention in this risk group [24]. Metabolized via glucuronidation primarily, as opposed to cytochrome p450 (CYP 3A4 isoenzyme), pitavastatin is thought to have fewer drug interactions with ARVs in general [6] (Table 2).

Relevant Drug-Drug Interactions

Deciding which statin to begin in HIV-infected patients depends on whether moderate- or high-intensity therapy is warranted and whether the potential for drug interaction with ARVs exists. Table 2 [6,12] depicts available statins and the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction with the primary ARV classes. Simvastatin and lovastatin are heavily metabolized via the CYP 3A4 pathway, resulting in the highest potential risk of interaction with CYP 3A4 inhibitors, such as the PIs, or inducers (eg, NNRTIs, in particular efavirenz) [6]. The former may inhibit metabolism of these statins, resulting in increased risk of toxicity, while co-administration with efavirenz, for example, may result in inadequate serum concentration and therefore inadequate lipid-lowering effects. Although less lipophilic, atorvastatin results in similar interactions with PIs and NNRTIs, and therefore low starting doses with close monitoring is recommended [6]. Fewer interactions have been noted with rosuvastatin, pravastatin, and pitavastatin, as these do not require CYP 3A4 for their metabolism and are thus less likely to be affected by ARVs. These therefore represent potentially safer first choices for certain patients on ARVs, although of these, only rosuvastatin is classified as a high-intensity statin [22,23] (Table 1). When compared directly to pravastatin 40 mg daily in patients receiving ritonavir-boosted PIs, rosuvastatin performed superiorly at 10 mg per day, resulting in more significant reductions in LDL and triglyceride levels [15]. Although it is eliminated largely unchanged through the kidney and liver, pravastatin has been reported to idiosyncratically interact with darunavir, resulting in potentially increased pravastatin levels and associated toxicity [25]. Treatment of pure hypertriglyceridemia in HIV-infected patients should begin with fibrates, which have little to no risk of interaction with most clinically relevant ARVs [6,10]. Alternatives to lower triglycerides include niacin and N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids [25].

Case 1 Continued

The patient has an impressive response to his initial regimen of TDF/FTC plus boosted darunavir, with repeat CD4 count after 12 weeks of 275 (18%) cells/mm³ and an undetectable viral load (< 20 copies/mL). Other lab parameters are favorable and he is tolerating the regimen well without notable side effects. However, at his next visit, although his viral load remains undetectable, his triglyceride level has increased to 350 mg/dL, although other lipid parameters are comparable to the prior result. He complains of diffuse body aches, concentrated in large muscle groups of the extremities, and dark-colored urine. A creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level is elevated at 300 IU/L (normal, 22–269, negative MB fraction). Serum creatinine is 1.4 mg/dL (had been 1.1 mg/dL at baseline). Given he has done so well otherwise on these ARVs, he is reluctant to make any changes.

• What drug-drug interaction is most likely causing this patient's problem, and how should it be managed?

This scenario is not uncommon in clinical practice, and changes to regimens are sometimes necessary in order to avoid drug interactions. Care must be taken to thoroughly review antiretroviral history and available resistance testing (in this case a relatively short history) in order to ensure a fully active and suppressive regimen is chosen. This description could be the result of an interaction between lipid-lowering therapy and ARVs resulting in increased relative concentrations of one drug or the other and therefore leading to toxicity. Given this possibility, and suboptimal control of hyperlipidemia, consideration should be given to switching both his ART and his statin therapy.

Safety and Potential Toxicities of Lipid-Lowering Therapy

Increased serum concentration of certain statins when co-administered with CYP 3A4 inhibitors like the PIs leads to heightened risk of statin-associated toxicities. In general, this includes muscle inflammation, leading to increases in serum CPK level and associated symptoms, including myalgias, myositis, or in extreme cases, rhabdomyolysis [6]. Although rare, this toxicity can be serious and may lead to acute renal injury if not recognized and managed appropriately. In theory, the potential for statin-associated hepatotoxicity may also be increased in patients receiving PIs, although this has not been borne out in clinical trials [26]. In fact, quite the opposite may be true, in that statins have been shown to improve liver function in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection and with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [6,15].

Case 1 Conclusion

The patient does well on his new ARV regimen of TAF/FTC and dolutegravir, 2 pills once daily. He no longer requires TMP/SMX, as his CD4 count has been reliably above 200 cells/mm³ on several occasions. Serum creatinine is back down to baseline and CPK has normalized. Fasting lipids have improved since the switch, and he no longer has symptoms of myositis on rosuvastatin 10 mg daily.

Summary

Consideration of statin therapy is complicated by potential drug interactions with ARVs and associated toxicity. However, given known effects of ARVs on lipids, and of immune activation and inflammation related to the virus itself, these patients should be carefully evaluated for statin therapy for their anti-inflammatory and immune modulatory effects as much as for their lipid-lowering ability. Utilization of HIV infection and its therapies as additional cardiovascular risk factors when calculating 10-year risk deserves further consideration; forthcoming results of the REPRIEVE trial are certain to contribute valuable information to this field of study.

Case Patient 2

Initial Presentation and History

A 45-year-old female with history of HIV infection since 2008 presents to the office for new-onset diabetes, diagnosed 2 weeks ago. She has had symptoms of polyuria and polydipsia for the last 1 month. She denies diarrhea, nausea, vomiting or weight loss. She is currently on a regimen consisting of zidovudine/lamivudine plus lopinavir/ritonavir. There is no family history of diabetes. Her examination is unremarkable, including normal vital signs (weight 150 lb, blood pressure 114/70, heart rate 76) and no evidence of insulin resistance, including acanthosis nigricans or striae. Glycosylated hemoglobin level (HbA1c) is 8%. Creatinine and liver function tests are within reference ranges.

• Do HIV-infected patients have a higher incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM)?

Prevalence of type 2 DM in HIV-infected patients varies between 2% to 14% [27]. This variation is due to the different cutoffs used for diagnosis, differences in cohorts studied, and how risk factors are analyzed [28–31]. In a recent nationally representative estimate of DM prevalence among HIV-infected adults receiving medical care in the United States in 2009–2010, the prevalence of DM was noted to be 10.3%. In comparison to the general adult US population, HIV-infected individuals have a 3.8% higher prevalence of DM after adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, poverty-level, obesity, and HCV infection [27].

There is controversy over whether HIV infection itself increases the risk of type 2 DM, with some studies showing increased risk [28,32,33] and others showing no independent effect or an inverse effect [30,34,35]. Studies on the impact of ethnicity and race on prevalence of DM are limited [36].

Certain traditional risk factors (age, ethnicity, obesity) are still responsible for most of the increased risk of diabetes in the HIV-infected population [35,37]. HIV infection itself is associated with metabolic dysfunction, independent of ARV. In HIV-infected patients, impaired glucose metabolism is associated with altered levels of adipokines, increased adiponectin and soluble-tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNFR1) and decreased leptin [38,39]. HIV-associated alterations in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell function also impair glycolysis, which may adversely impact glucose metabolism [40].

Other contributing factors in HIV-infected patients are HCV co-infection [41], medications (atypical antipsychotics, corticosteroids), opiates, and low testosterone [42]. HCV co-infection may lead to hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis, and increasing insulin resistance.

Recent genomic studies show several common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with diabetes in the general population. In the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, SNPs accounted for 14% of type 2 DM risk variability, whereas ARV exposure accounted for 3% and age for 19% of the variability in DM [43].

ARVs also increase the risk of type 2 DM by both direct and indirect effects. Certain ARVs causes lipoatrophy [30] and visceral fat accumulation/lipohypertrophy [29,44]. PIs increase insulin resistance via effects on GLUT-4 transporter and decrease insulin secretion through effects on B cell function [45]. NRTIs (eg, stavudine, zidovudine and didanosine) can cause direct mitochondrial toxicity [46–48]. Utilization of newer ARV agents has decreased the prevalence of severe lipoatrophy, but lipohypertrophy and the underlying metabolic abnormalities persist. The DHHS “preferred” nucleoside analogues, tenofovir and abacavir, do not induce mitochondrial toxicity and have more favorable metabolic profiles [49,50]. In ACTG Study 5142, thymidine-sparing regimens were found to cause less lipoatrophy [51]. In addition, darunavir and atazanavir, the preferred and alternative PIs and the integrase strand transfer inhibitor have limited or modest impact on insulin sensitivity [20,52,53]. This has led to a recent decline in the incidence of type 2 DM in HIV-infected patients.

Statins can also increase insulin resistance and DM [54], although studies have shown mixed results [55–57]. The benefits of statin therapy likely outweigh the risk of DM since there is a significant cardiovascular event reduction with their use [58,59].

• How is diabetes diagnosed in HIV-infected patients?

Optimal diabetes screening guidelines have not been established specifically for HIV-infected patients. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines recommend that diabetes in the general population be diagnosed by 2 elevated fasting blood glucose levels, HbA1c, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), or high random glucose with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia [60]. Repeat testing is recommended every 3 years. The OGTT is recommended for diagnosis in pregnant women.

HbA1c may underestimate glycemic burden in HIV-infected individual due to higher mean corpuscular volume, NRTI use (specifically abacavir), or lower CD4 count [61–65]. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 2013 primary care guidelines for HIV-infected patients recommends obtaining a fasting glucose and/or HbA1c prior to and within 1–3 months after starting ARV [12]. Use of HbA1c threshold cutoff of 5.8% for the diagnosis of DM and testing every 6–12 months are recommended.

• How should this patient’s diabetes be managed?

The ADA guidelines suggest a patient-centered approach to management of diabetes [66]. All patients should be educated about lifestyle modifications with medical nutrition therapy and moderate-intensity aerobic activity and weight loss [67]. If a patient is on lopinavir/ritonavir or a thymidine analogue (zidovudine, stavudine), one should consider switching the ARV regimen [2].

There are currently no randomized controlled trials of diabetes treatment specific to patients with HIV infection. Metformin is the first-line agent. It improves insulin sensitivity by reducing hepatic glucose production and improving peripheral glucose uptake and lipid parameters [68,69]. Other oral hypoglycemic agents used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes are shown in Table 3.

Case 2 Continued

The patient is switched to TAF/FTC plus dolutegravir with improvement in blood sugars. She is also started on metformin. Co-administration of metformin and dolutegravir will be carefully monitored since dolutegravir increases metformin concentration [70]. When dolutegravir is used with metformin, the total daily dose of metformin should be limited to 1000 mg.

• How should this patient be followed?

If the patient is still not at goal HbAb1c at follow-up, there are multiple other treatment options, including use of insulin. Goal HbA1c for most patients with type 2 DM is < 7%; however, this goal should be individualized for each patient in accordance with the ADA guidelines [12]. A longitudinal cohort study of 11,346 veterans with type 2 diabetes compared the glycemic effectiveness of oral diabetic medications ( metformin, sulfonylurea and a thiazolidinedione) among veterans with and without HIV infection. This study did not find any significant difference in HbA1c based on different diabetes medications. However the HBA1c reduction was less in black and Hispanic patients. The mechanism for the poorer response among these patients need to be evaluated further [71]. In addition to management of blood sugar, other CVD risk factors, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, smoking, etc, should be assessed and managed aggressively.

Case Patient 3

Initial Presentation and History

A 45-year-old male with a history of HIV infection diagnosed 10 years ago, on TDF/FTC/efavirenz (trade name Atripla) for the last 7 years, presents with a left femoral neck fracture after he missed the pavement and fell on his left hip. His history is significant for IV drug abuse for 10 years prior to diagnosis of HIV, and he has been on methadone for the last 6 years.

• Is HIV infection associated with increased prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis and increased risk of fractures?

With recent advancements in antiretroviral therapy and improved survival of the HIV-infected population, osteoporosis and increased fracture risk have become important causes of morbidity and mortality. Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength, which predisposes to an increased risk of fracture. The World Health Organization defines osteoporosis as a bone mineral density (BMD) measurement by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, hip, or forearm that is more than 2.5 standard deviations below that of a "young normal" adult (T-score < –2.5) or a history of one or more fragility fractures. Fragility fractures result from mechanical forces that would not ordinarily result in fracture, such as fall from standing height [40]. Osteopenia is characterized by low BMD (T-score between –1.0 and –2.5) and can be a precursor to osteoporosis.

Several observational, retrospective, and prospective studies have shown lower bone density and an increased risk of fractures in the HIV-infected population compared to age-, race- and sex-matched HIV-negative adults. In a large meta-analysis of pooled prevalence data on 884 HIV-infected patients compared with 654 HIV-uninfected age- and sex-matched controls [72], overall, HIV-infected patients had a significant 6.4-fold increased odds of reduced BMD and a 3.7-fold increased odds of osteoporosis compared to the control population. This meta-analysis also compared ARV-treated subjects to ARV-naive subjects and showed that ARV-treated subjects (n = 824) had a higher prevalence of reduced BMD compared with ARV-naive subjects (n= 202; odds ratio 2.5, 95% CI 1.8–3.7). The odds of osteoporosis was increased 2.4 times (95% CI 1.2 – 4.8) in ARV-treated subjects compared with ARV-naive subjects. None of the studies adjusted for potentially important confounding factors, such as age or duration of HIV infection. PI-treated patients (n = 791) were also found to have a higher prevalence of reduced BMD compared with PI-untreated patients (n = 410; OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1–2.0). The odds of osteoporosis in PI-treated patients (n = 666) was also 1.6-fold greater (95% CI 1.1–2.3) than those not treated with PI (n = 367).

Low bone density has also been reported in HIV- positive premenopausal women irrespective of ARV status. In a recent study of 89 premenopausal women (mean age, 37 years) predominantly of African origin with HIV infection, osteopenia and osteoporosis were prevalent in one-third of these women, irrespective of ARV use and were associated with low BMI [73]. In a sub-study of the INSIGHT trial evaluating prevalence of and risk factors for low BMD in untreated HIV infection, performed at several sites across 6 continents involving 424 subjects, osteopenia was present in a third of this relatively young predominantly non-white ART-naive population (mean age 34 + 10 years) with normal CD4 cell counts, while only 2% had osteoporosis. Factors independently associated with lower BMD at the hip and spine were female sex, Latino/Hispanic ethnicity, lower BMI, and higher estimated glomerular filtration rate. Longer duration of HIV infection was also associated with lower hip BMD. Current or nadir CD4 cell count and HIV viral load were not associated with low BMD [74].

Many studies have reported increased fracture prevalence in the HIV population. In a retrospective study of fracture prevalence in a large US health care system, a significantly higher rate of fractures was reported in HIV-infected men and women compared to non-HIV-infected controls (2.87 vs. 1.77 fractures per 100 persons, P < 0.001). The difference in the increased fracture prevalence was greater in HIV positive men compared to women (3.08 vs. 1.83; P < 0.001). Vertebral, wrist and hip fractures were more prevalent in men compared to vertebral and wrist fractures only in women. Fracture prevalence was higher in both Caucasian females and males and only in African-American women [75].

In the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) [76], age-adjusted fracture rates in the HIV population were noted to be 1.98 to 3.69 times higher than rates in the general population. The HOPS was an open prospective cohort study of HIV-infected adults who were followed at 10 US HIV clinics. Rates of first fractures at any anatomic site from 2000–2008 were assessed among 5826 active HOPS patients (median age 40 years, 79% male, 52% Caucasian, and 73% exposed to ART). Among persons aged 25–54 years, both fracture rates and relative proportion of fragility fractures were higher among HOPS patients than among outpatient controls. Older age, substance abuse, nadir CD4+ cell count <200 cells/mm, HCV infection and DM were associated with incident fractures [76].

• What factors contribute to poor bone health in the HIV population?

Several factors that contribute to low bone density are present at a higher rate in the HIV population (Table 4). These include poor nutritional status in terms of suboptimal calcium and vitamin D intake, hypogonadism, low body weight, and alcohol, tobacco and substance abuse.

Vitamin D deficiency is very common in HIV-infected patients, with a prevalence of up to 60% to 75% [77]. Hypogonadism is also relatively common among HIV population [78], contributing to lower bone density. Co-infection with HCV is also associated with increased risk of fractures. In a large cohort of Medicaid beneficiaries, a significant increase in the risk of hip fracture was demonstrated in HCV/HIV co-infected subjects compared either with HCV mono-infected, HIV mono-infected or non-infected individuals [79]. In another large database study, a significantly higher risk of osteoporotic fracture (closed wrist, vertebral or hip fracture) was reported in HCV/HIV co-infected versus HIV mono-infected individuals [80] with fracture rates of 2.57 and 2.07/1000 patient-years (P < 0.001). Dual treatment for HIV/hepatitis B co-infection has also been shown to be associated with a higher risk of hip fracture compared to treatment of HIV mono-infected individuals [81].

HIV infection itself can increase bone loss and reduce bone formation through direct effects related to the HIV antigen load or indirect effects related to activation of the pro-inflammatory cytokines resulting in bone resorption and loss [82]. Co-infection with HCV and/or hepatitis B also contributes to lower bone density in this population. Certain ARVs may also contribute to low bone density in the HIV population. Lipoatrophy related to HIV may also mediate bone loss through complex relationship between central signaling of adipocyte hormones [82,83].

Direct Viral Effects

Several HIV viral proteins have been shown to promote osteoclast activity (vpr and gp120), suppress osteoblast activity (p55-gag) and increase osteoblast apoptosis [84], resulting in increased bone resorption and reduced bone formation, leading to low bone mass. High HIV RNA viral load and T-cell activation are also associated with elevated levels of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), which results in osteoclast formation and increased bone resorption [85]. Other endogenous physiological inhibitors of osteoclastogenesis such as osteoprotegrin and interferon-γ levels are also remarkably downregulated in advanced HIV infection, resulting in increased bone resorption [86]. At a cellular level, HIV proteins including Tat and Nef reduce the number of available mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) precursors that proliferate into osteoblasts by inducing MSC senescence, due to increased oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction resulting in reduced proliferation of osteoblasts and lower rates of bone formation [87]. Collectively, these mechanisms result in significant uncoupling of bone formation and resorption, resulting in less bone formation and greater rate of bone loss and lower bone density.

Pro-inflammatory Pathways

Cytokines and other soluble immune factors play a major role in the physiology of osteoblast maturation and osteoclastic bone resorption [88,89]. Immune dysfunction and persistent inflammation in HIV result in increased levels of several inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and RANKL, resulting in stimulation of osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption [90]. Due to a disruption between T and B cells in HIV and decreased osteoprotegrin (OPG) production and increased RANKL level, RANKL/OPG ratio is elevated, favoring osteoclastogenesis [91].

• Is antiretroviral therapy associated with bone loss?

The initiation of ART has been reported to cause 2% to 6% bone loss irrespective of the regimen used, similar to that sustained in the first 2 years after menopause [92]. Certain NRTIs and PIs are associated with higher rates of bone loss than others. TDF has been associated most commonly with decreased bone mineral density, which usually stabilizes with continued use [93]. In a randomized trial comparing 4 treatment arms of ABC/3TC or TDF/FTC with EFV or ATV/ritonavir, TDF was associated with a greater reduction in BMD compared to abacavir-based regimens [94]. The likely cause of this may be TDF-mediated renal toxicity, including proximal tubular dysfunction and hypophosphatemia, resulting in increased PTH and bone resorption, and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus [95]. TAF is another prodrug of tenofovir diphosphate associated with less renal and bone toxicity compared with TDF. TAF has been associated with significantly less decrease in bone mineral density and renal dysfunction in randomized studies compared to regimen using TDF [17]. Vitamin D deficiency and hypophosphatemia associated with TDF therapy may present with osteomalacia, which predisposes to bone pain and fractures. Treatment with TDF may rarely be associated with the development of Fanconi syndrome and osteomalacia [96]. BMD is often severely reduced and bone pain and pathological fractures are characteristic features. Certain PI regimens containing ritonavir-boosted atazanavir have also been associated with greater bone loss in the spine than the hip, compared to efavirenz-containing regimens [97].

The universal bone loss associated with ART is thought to be a result of the "immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome" (IRIS). This occurs as a result of rapid improvement in immune function after the commencement of ARV as a result of systemic or local inflammation, resulting in increased levels of cytokines that may contribute to bone loss. This has been shown in animal studies where T cell transplantation into immunocompromised mice to mimic ARV-induced T-cell expansion resulted in increased RANKL and TNF-α production by B cells and/or T cells, accompanied by enhanced bone resorption and BMD loss. When TNF-α or RANKL-null T-cells or TNF-α antagonists were used instead, the loss of cortical bone was prevented [98]. In a prospective study evaluating changes in bone turnover markers and inflammatory cytokines with ARV therapy in HIV infected subjects, a significant increase in bone resorption markers, RANKL and TNF-α were seen after initiation of ARV. The magnitude of CD4-cell recovery correlated with the increase in markers of bone resorption [99], suggesting that recovery of the immune system contributes to the increase in cytokine-mediated bone resorption.

• How is bone health and fracture risk assessed in the HIV-positive population?

The predictive value of low BMD for fracture risk assessment in the HIV-positive population has not been established. In the absence of definitive data, the fracture risk assessment and standard methods of measuring bone density using DXA are utilized. In a large study of 1000 men and women, osteoporosis defined as a BMD T-score –2.5 as measured by DXA, was associated with a significantly increased risk of incident fractures but was not a good predictor of morphometric vertebral fractures [100]. In the absence of prospective longitudinal studies evaluating the bone density parameters at which fracture risk is significantly increased in the HIV population, it is reasonable to follow the guidelines used in the non-HIV population.

The approach to treatment of osteopenia and osteoporosis is similar to that in non HIV-infected population and is directed at lifestyle changes and treatment of secondary causes of osteoporosis [101], followed by initiation of antiresorptive therapy.

Management of Bone Disease

There are several guidelines available for the management of bone disease in the HIV population. The most recent guidelines from the IDSA [12] recommend assessing the risk of fragility fracture using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), without DXA, in all HIV-infected men aged 40–49 years and HIV-infected premenopausal women aged ≥ 40 years. DXA should be performed in men aged ≥ 50 years, postmenopausal women, patients with a history of fragility fracture, patients receiving chronic glucocorticoid treatment, and patients at high risk of falls. In resource-limited settings, FRAX without bone mineral density can be substituted for DXA. ART guidelines should be followed. TDF and boosted PIs should be avoided if possible in at-risk patients. Dietary and lifestyle management strategies for high-risk patients should be employed and anti-osteoporosis treatment initiated if indicated [102].

The FRAX tool is available at www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/ and is used to calculate 10-year fracture risk using patient clinical data, including presence of risk factors for osteoporosis. The tool is population-specific by race and region. It has not been validated for the HIV-positive population and may underestimate fracture risk [103]. HIV status is considered a secondary cause of osteoporosis in FRAX calculation.

The National Osteoporosis Foundation recommends screening with DXA for all women > 65 years of age, all men > 70 years of age, and adults > 50 years of age with additional risk factors for osteoporosis. Evaluation for secondary causes for low BMD should always be considered in the HIV-positive population including evaluation of calcium and vitamin D intake. Laboratory testing may include complete blood count, calcium, phosphate, albumin, creatinine, PTH, 25 hydroxy vitamin D (25,OHD) and 24 hour urine for evaluation of calcium, creatinine and phosphate (especially if on TDF) excretion. Testosterone level can be checked in men and estradiol, prolactin, FSH and LH in women for evaluation of hypogonadism. Bone turnover markers (bone specific alkaline phosphatase and serum C-terminal telopeptide) can also be assessed at baseline.

Studies using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HSPQCT) have shown significant reductions in tibial trabecular bone density and trabecular number in pre-menopausal and postmenopausal HIV-infected women [104], with reduced bone stiffness measured using finite element analysis [105]. Co-infection with HCV is also associated with significantly lower trabecular volumetric BMD and smaller cortical dimensions in the tibia, compared to healthy subjects [106]. HSPQCT is not widely available for clinical use at this time. Lateral imaging of the spine or vertebral morphometric analysis may be done in cases of height loss to assess for occult vertebral compression fractures.

There is a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the HIV-infected population [107]. Treatment goal is to have a vitamin D level of at least 30 ng/mL, based on Endocrine Society practice guidelines [108], and may require supplementation with 1000–2000 units of vitamin D daily. Calcium intake should be optimized, averaging 1000 mg per day including diet and supplements, to be taken in divided amounts through the day for optimal absorption. Secondary causes of low bone density as mentioned in Table 4 should also be addressed. Patients should be counseled on tobacco and alcohol abuse. Corticosteroids should be dosed at the lowest dose needed. Medications such as proton pump inhibitors can impair the absorption of calcium carbonate, in which case calcium citrate supplements should be used if there is suboptimal calcium intake in the diet.

• Which medications have been shown to be effective in treatment of osteoporosis in the HIV population?

Bisphosphonates are the mainstay of therapy for osteoporosis in the HIV-infected population. Only alendronate and zoledronate have substantial evidence of safety and effectiveness in the HIV-infected population, but these studies have been small and of limited duration.

Bisphosphonates are pyrophosphate analogues that inhibit bone resorption by binding to the hydroxyapatite crystals in the bone. Several prospective studies have shown alendronate to increase bone density compared to calcium and vitamin D alone in the HIV infected patients with reduced bone density [109,110], with significant reduction in markers of bone resorption [111].

Zoledronic acid (ZA), an amino-bisphosphonate which is infused intravenously, has also been used in smaller studies in HIV-infected persons. In a prospective study evaluating yearly ZA infusion to biennial ZA infusion in subjects with HIV and low bone density [112], biennial ZA infusions were found to be effective in improving and maintaining bone density in the HIV population. In another prospective study evaluating the effects of ZA in HIV-positive men, ZA infusion was given at baseline and at 12 months. Compared to placebo, treatment group had significantly higher bone density and lower bone turnover markers till 5 years after the last infusion [113].

In a meta-analysis evaluating the effect of bisphosphonates on bone mineral density in 328 adults with HIV infection from 8 randomized controlled trials (5 with alendronate and 3 with ZA as the intervention), a significant increase in BMD at the lumbar spine and hip was observed in the treatment groups at 48 and 96 weeks. However, these studies were not long enough to detect the impact of bisphosphonates on fracture risk [114]. ZA has also been shown to be effective in preventing ARV induced bone loss after a single infusion [115].

These studies confirm that both alendronate and ZA are effective in improving BMD in the HIV-infected population, with early studies showing a beneficial effect of ZA in mitigating ARV-induced bone loss as well. DXA may be repeated 1 to 2 years after initiation of osteoporosis therapy and less often subsequently if BMD is stable to improved [116].

Although these studies show significant improvement in bone density with treatment, longitudinal data on fracture reduction with these medications in the HIV-infected population are not available. Additionally, these patients have onset of osteoporosis at a younger age and the need for osteoporosis treatment needs to be assessed carefully before initiating treatment. There are other medications available for the treatment of osteoporosis in the non-HIV population such as raloxifene, teriparatide and denosumab, but no randomized controlled studies of these agents are available in the HIV-infected population.

Summary

The advent of highly potent antiretroviral therapy capable of early and prolonged viral suppression in HIV-infected patients has resulted in significant increases in life span. As we have already seen, this will likely lead to a rising incidence of various metabolic complications of HIV and ARV, including hyperlipidemia and diabetes with associated cardiovascular disease risk. A keen awareness of these potential complications, drug interactions, and possible toxicities will be paramount to their successful management. Appropriate care of HIV-infected individuals going forward will likely require multidisciplinary collaboration as the epidemic evolves to allow our patients to live not only longer, but healthier lives.

Corresponding author: Lisa M. Chirch, MD, UCONN Health, Farmington, CT 06030, [email protected].

Financial disclosures: None

Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to this article

Syphilis is a chronic systemic infection that has been allotted the epithet “the great imitator” for its gross and histologic similarity to numerous other skin pathologies. Well-characterized for centuries, syphilis features diverse clinical manifestations including a number of cutaneous symptoms.¹

RELATED AUDIOCAST: The Syphilis Epidemic: Dermatologists on the Frontline of Treatment and Diagnosis

The primary stage of infection is classically defined by an asymptomatic chancre at the inoculation site. The secondary stage results from the systemic dissemination of the infection and typically is characterized by cutaneous eruptions, regional lymphadenopathy, and flulike symptoms. This stage gained its notoriety as the great imitator owing to its ability to present with a variety of papulosquamous eruptions. The secondary stage is followed by an asymptomatic latent period that may last months to years, followed by the tertiary stage, which is characterized by the neurologic, cardiovascular, and/or gummatous manifestations that represent the major sources of morbidity and mortality associated with syphilis. It is during the primary, secondary, and early latent stages that the infection is communicable.¹

Case Report

A 40-year-old man presented with multiple intensely pruritic, scattered, erythematous and slightly violaceous, flat-topped papules on the scrotum (Figure 1A) and penile shaft (Figure 1B) of 1 week’s duration. Some of these lesions were annular in appearance. The patient denied any other dermatologic concerns and showed no other skin lesions. A shave biopsy of the right side of the penile shaft was performed, revealing minimal papillary dermis and superficial perivascular dermatitis with substantial perivascular plasmalymphocytic infiltration. The epidermal layer was mildly acanthotic with parakeratosis. A tentative diagnosis of secondary syphilis of unknown latency was made and confirmatory laboratory studies were ordered.

Within weeks, the patient developed a painful 7-mm white patch on the right lower mucosal lip followed several days later by the appearance of a painful lesion on the hard palate (Figure 2 [arrow indicates palatal lesion]) and odynophagia. He presented to the emergency department roughly 3 weeks from the time of index presentation and was started empirically on amoxicillin 500 mg 3 times daily for 10 days for suspicion of strep throat. At a scheduled follow-up with his dermatologist 1 week later, physical examination showed complete resolution of the mucosal lip patch and genital lesions. A round erythematous patch on the right hard palate consistent with a resolving mucosal patch also was noted. A diagnosis of secondary syphilitic infection was made with a rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer of 1:32 (reference range, <1:1) and positive Treponema antibodies. The patient was treated with a single dose of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million U to prevent the development of tertiary syphilis.

Comment

Incidence
Syphilis has been well characterized since the early 15th century, though its geographic origin remains a topic of controversy.² Although acquired syphilis infections represented a major source of morbidity and mortality in the early 20th century, the prevalence of syphilis in the United States declined substantially thereafter due to improved public health management.² Syphilis was relatively rare in the United States by the year 1956, with fewer than 7000 cases of primary and secondary disease reported annually.³ The incidence of primary and secondary syphilis infections in the United States increased gradually until 1990 before declining precipitously and reaching an unprecedented low of 2.2 cases per 100,000 individuals in 2000.⁴ These shifts ultimately have resulted in decreased clinical familiarity with the disease presentation of syphilis among many health care providers. Since 2000, the incidence of syphilis infection has increased in the United States, with the greatest increases seen in men who have sex with men, intravenous drug users, and human immunodeficiency virus–infected individuals.^5-7

RELATED ARTICLE: Syphilis and the Dermatologist

Pathogenesis and Transmission
The causative agent in syphilis infection is the bacterium Treponema pallidum, a member of the family Spirochaetaceae, which is distinguished by its thin, regularly coiled form and distinctive corkscrew motility.⁸ Syphilis is communicated primarily by sexual contact or in utero exposure during the primary and secondary stages of maternal infection.⁹ At the time of presentation, our patient denied having any new sexual partners or practices. He reported a monogamous heterosexual relationship within the months preceding presentation, suggesting historical inaccuracy on the part of the patient or probable infidelity in the reported relationship as an alternative means of infection transmission. Untreated individuals may be contagious for longer than 1 year,⁹ making transmission patterns difficult to track clinically.

Presentation
The clinical presentation of infection with T pallidum results from dual humoral and cell-mediated inflammatory responses in the host. The primary stage is classically defined by a single chancre, which develops at the inoculation site(s) 9 to 90 days following exposure. The chancre typically begins as a small papule that rapidly develops into a painless ulcer characterized by an indurated border, red base, bordering edema, and a diameter of 2 cm or less. Indolent regional lymphadenopathy often is observed in conjunction with the primary chancre.¹⁰ Our case is notable for the absence of a primary syphilitic lesion and lack of adenopathy. The primary chancre of syphilis typically resolves within 3 to 6 weeks of onset regardless of whether the patient is treated,⁴ thus suggesting the rare possibility that our patient developed a painless primary chancre without realizing it.

The secondary stage of syphilis infection arises weeks to months after resolution of the primary chancre and is triggered by hematogenous and lymphatic dissemination of the bacteria. The symptoms of secondary syphilis are primarily flulike and may include headache, malaise, fatigue, sore throat, arthralgia, and low-grade fever.⁹ Nontender regional lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly also have been reported.¹¹ Our patient denied any systemic concerns throughout the duration of his illness, with the exception of odynophagia in association with ulceration of the oral mucosa. Abnormal laboratory findings in secondary syphilis are nonspecific and may include an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and/or an increased white blood cell count with absolute lymphocytosis.¹² Laboratory studies drawn at the time of presentation showed no such abnormalities in our patient.

The cutaneous signs of secondary syphilis arise concurrently with systemic manifestations and are a common finding, with lesions of the skin or oral mucosa present in up to 80% of patients,¹³ as in our case. Oral lesions classically involve ulcerations at the tip and sides of the tongue,¹² which is distinct from our patient who developed oral lesions of the mucosal lip and hard palate.

Secondary syphilis classically features a copper-colored maculopapular rash with sharply delineated margins typically present on the palmar and plantar surfaces.¹⁴ Verrucous lesions appearing as moist exophytic plaques on the genitals, intertriginous areas, and/or perineum also have been described and are referred to as condyloma lata in the setting of secondary syphilis.¹⁵ In contrast to these classic findings, our patient demonstrated lichenoid lesions on the genitalia and white mucosal patches on the oral mucosa. Our case also was highly unusual because of the intense pruritus associated with the genital lesions, which starkly contrasts most secondary-stage cutaneous lesions that are classically asymptomatic.¹⁴ Additionally, our case was distinctive due to the lack of palmar or plantar involvement, which is considered a characteristic feature of secondary cutaneous syphilis.¹ Finally, our case was notable for the presence of multiple annular cutaneous lesions, which indicated a late secondary-stage infection during which involution of the lesions produced endarteritis as deeper vessels became involved. A 20-year retrospective study by Abell et al¹¹ demonstrated that 40% of syphilitic rashes are macular, 40% are maculopapular, 10% are papular (as in our case), and the remaining 10% are not easily grouped within these categories.

Differential Diagnosis
It has been estimated that approximately 8% of cutaneous syphilitic lesions demonstrate morphology and distributions suggestive of other dermatologic conditions, including atopic dermatitis, pityriasis rosea, psoriasis, drug-induced eruptions, erythema multiforme, mycosis fungoides, and far more uncommonly lichenoid lesions,^16,17 as in our case.

Histopathology
It has been demonstrated that the gross appearance of the secondary syphilitic lesion depends both on the degree of inflammatory infiltrate and the extent of vascular involvement producing ischemia of the skin.¹ Our case presented with small, flat-topped, papular lesions that grossly resembled lichen planus and were ultimately shown to be the product of dense lymphomononuclear infiltration extending perivascularly and throughout the superficial and deep dermis.

Biopsy of a lesion is one means of diagnosis, though the histologic appearance of secondary syphilis can mimic many other diseases. In primary and secondary syphilis, skin biopsy characteristically shows central thinning or ulceration of the epidermal layer with heavy dermal lymphocyte infiltration, lymphovascular proliferation with endarteritis, small-vessel thrombosis, and dermal necrosis. Lichen planus–type dermatitis is histologically characterized by hyperkeratosis, irregular epidermal hyperplasia, and a dermoepidermal junction that may be obscured by a dense lymphomononuclear infiltrate.⁹ The specimen taken from our patient showed minimal infiltrate in the papillary dermis, suggesting a diagnosis of secondary syphilis with lichenoid features. Despite a gross appearance consistent with lichen planus, the biopsy lacked the hydropic degeneration of the basal layer and keratinocyte necrosis that typically characterize this condition.

Diagnosis
Serologic testing for syphilis infection is comprised of nontreponemal and treponemal studies. Nontreponemal testing, which includes the RPR and VDRL test, detects antibodies to cardiolipin-lecithin antigen, a lipid component of the cell membranes of T pallidum. Because the specificity of these tests is fairly low, they typically are used only for screening and monitoring of disease progression and/or response to treatment. Approximately 25% of cases in the United States of primary syphilis are not detected by nontreponemal testing, whereas a nonreactive test nearly always excludes a diagnosis of secondary or latent-stage syphilitic infection.⁹ Indeed, nontreponemal studies show the highest antibody titers during the late secondary and early latent stages of infection with declining titers thereafter, even in the absence of antibiotic treatment. In our case, diagnosis was made by biopsy and RPR was used for staging; RPR was reactive at a dilution of 1:32, indicative of secondary or early latent infection.

Treponemal testing, which includes the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test, and multiplex flow immunoassay detects antibodies that are specific to syphilis infection. Treponemal antibodies are detectable earlier in the course of infection than nontreponemal antibodies and remain permanently detectable even following treatment. Because of its high specificity, treponemal testing often is used to confirm diagnosis after positive screening with nontreponemal tests.⁴ Positive fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption testing and positive multiplex flow immunoassay may be used to confirm the diagnosis of T pallidum infection.

The tertiary stage of syphilis infection can occur years after conclusion of the secondary stage and is comprised of one or more of the following: gummas, aortic dilatation or dissection, and neurosyphilitic manifestations such as tabes dorsalis or general paresis.¹ It is of vital importance to identify syphilis infection prior to the onset of the tertiary stage to prevent substantial morbidity and mortality.

Treatment
Our patient’s symptoms abated after empiric treatment with amoxicillin for presumed streptococcal throat infection after he presented to the emergency department with odynophagia, which is not surprising given the moderate-spectrum coverage of this β-lactam antibiotic as well as the near-complete susceptibility of Treponema spirochetes to amoxicillin in primary and secondary syphilis with notably lower efficacy in latent or tertiary disease. It was essential to treat the patient with a single dose of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million U, which has been shown to reliably prevent recurrence of infection or progression to tertiary syphilis.¹⁸

Conclusion

We present a rare case of lichenoid secondary syphilis in the absence of lesions on the palmar and plantar surfaces. The patient lacked any other cutaneous or systemic manifestations, except for odynophagia in association with oral mucosal lesions. He denied any new sexual partners and did not recall having a primary chancre. Also strikingly unusual in this case was the intense pruritus associated with the genital eruption, which is unlike the classic lack of symptoms experienced in the great majority of eruptions due to secondary syphilis. A clinical appreciation of the many cutaneous manifestations of syphilis infection remains critical to early identification of the disease prior to progression to the tertiary stage and its devastating sequelae.

Syphilis is a chronic systemic infection that has been allotted the epithet “the great imitator” for its gross and histologic similarity to numerous other skin pathologies. Well-characterized for centuries, syphilis features diverse clinical manifestations including a number of cutaneous symptoms.¹

RELATED AUDIOCAST: The Syphilis Epidemic: Dermatologists on the Frontline of Treatment and Diagnosis

The primary stage of infection is classically defined by an asymptomatic chancre at the inoculation site. The secondary stage results from the systemic dissemination of the infection and typically is characterized by cutaneous eruptions, regional lymphadenopathy, and flulike symptoms. This stage gained its notoriety as the great imitator owing to its ability to present with a variety of papulosquamous eruptions. The secondary stage is followed by an asymptomatic latent period that may last months to years, followed by the tertiary stage, which is characterized by the neurologic, cardiovascular, and/or gummatous manifestations that represent the major sources of morbidity and mortality associated with syphilis. It is during the primary, secondary, and early latent stages that the infection is communicable.¹

Case Report

A 40-year-old man presented with multiple intensely pruritic, scattered, erythematous and slightly violaceous, flat-topped papules on the scrotum (Figure 1A) and penile shaft (Figure 1B) of 1 week’s duration. Some of these lesions were annular in appearance. The patient denied any other dermatologic concerns and showed no other skin lesions. A shave biopsy of the right side of the penile shaft was performed, revealing minimal papillary dermis and superficial perivascular dermatitis with substantial perivascular plasmalymphocytic infiltration. The epidermal layer was mildly acanthotic with parakeratosis. A tentative diagnosis of secondary syphilis of unknown latency was made and confirmatory laboratory studies were ordered.

Within weeks, the patient developed a painful 7-mm white patch on the right lower mucosal lip followed several days later by the appearance of a painful lesion on the hard palate (Figure 2 [arrow indicates palatal lesion]) and odynophagia. He presented to the emergency department roughly 3 weeks from the time of index presentation and was started empirically on amoxicillin 500 mg 3 times daily for 10 days for suspicion of strep throat. At a scheduled follow-up with his dermatologist 1 week later, physical examination showed complete resolution of the mucosal lip patch and genital lesions. A round erythematous patch on the right hard palate consistent with a resolving mucosal patch also was noted. A diagnosis of secondary syphilitic infection was made with a rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer of 1:32 (reference range, <1:1) and positive Treponema antibodies. The patient was treated with a single dose of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million U to prevent the development of tertiary syphilis.

Comment

Incidence
Syphilis has been well characterized since the early 15th century, though its geographic origin remains a topic of controversy.² Although acquired syphilis infections represented a major source of morbidity and mortality in the early 20th century, the prevalence of syphilis in the United States declined substantially thereafter due to improved public health management.² Syphilis was relatively rare in the United States by the year 1956, with fewer than 7000 cases of primary and secondary disease reported annually.³ The incidence of primary and secondary syphilis infections in the United States increased gradually until 1990 before declining precipitously and reaching an unprecedented low of 2.2 cases per 100,000 individuals in 2000.⁴ These shifts ultimately have resulted in decreased clinical familiarity with the disease presentation of syphilis among many health care providers. Since 2000, the incidence of syphilis infection has increased in the United States, with the greatest increases seen in men who have sex with men, intravenous drug users, and human immunodeficiency virus–infected individuals.^5-7

RELATED ARTICLE: Syphilis and the Dermatologist

Pathogenesis and Transmission
The causative agent in syphilis infection is the bacterium Treponema pallidum, a member of the family Spirochaetaceae, which is distinguished by its thin, regularly coiled form and distinctive corkscrew motility.⁸ Syphilis is communicated primarily by sexual contact or in utero exposure during the primary and secondary stages of maternal infection.⁹ At the time of presentation, our patient denied having any new sexual partners or practices. He reported a monogamous heterosexual relationship within the months preceding presentation, suggesting historical inaccuracy on the part of the patient or probable infidelity in the reported relationship as an alternative means of infection transmission. Untreated individuals may be contagious for longer than 1 year,⁹ making transmission patterns difficult to track clinically.

Presentation
The clinical presentation of infection with T pallidum results from dual humoral and cell-mediated inflammatory responses in the host. The primary stage is classically defined by a single chancre, which develops at the inoculation site(s) 9 to 90 days following exposure. The chancre typically begins as a small papule that rapidly develops into a painless ulcer characterized by an indurated border, red base, bordering edema, and a diameter of 2 cm or less. Indolent regional lymphadenopathy often is observed in conjunction with the primary chancre.¹⁰ Our case is notable for the absence of a primary syphilitic lesion and lack of adenopathy. The primary chancre of syphilis typically resolves within 3 to 6 weeks of onset regardless of whether the patient is treated,⁴ thus suggesting the rare possibility that our patient developed a painless primary chancre without realizing it.

The secondary stage of syphilis infection arises weeks to months after resolution of the primary chancre and is triggered by hematogenous and lymphatic dissemination of the bacteria. The symptoms of secondary syphilis are primarily flulike and may include headache, malaise, fatigue, sore throat, arthralgia, and low-grade fever.⁹ Nontender regional lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly also have been reported.¹¹ Our patient denied any systemic concerns throughout the duration of his illness, with the exception of odynophagia in association with ulceration of the oral mucosa. Abnormal laboratory findings in secondary syphilis are nonspecific and may include an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and/or an increased white blood cell count with absolute lymphocytosis.¹² Laboratory studies drawn at the time of presentation showed no such abnormalities in our patient.

The cutaneous signs of secondary syphilis arise concurrently with systemic manifestations and are a common finding, with lesions of the skin or oral mucosa present in up to 80% of patients,¹³ as in our case. Oral lesions classically involve ulcerations at the tip and sides of the tongue,¹² which is distinct from our patient who developed oral lesions of the mucosal lip and hard palate.

Secondary syphilis classically features a copper-colored maculopapular rash with sharply delineated margins typically present on the palmar and plantar surfaces.¹⁴ Verrucous lesions appearing as moist exophytic plaques on the genitals, intertriginous areas, and/or perineum also have been described and are referred to as condyloma lata in the setting of secondary syphilis.¹⁵ In contrast to these classic findings, our patient demonstrated lichenoid lesions on the genitalia and white mucosal patches on the oral mucosa. Our case also was highly unusual because of the intense pruritus associated with the genital lesions, which starkly contrasts most secondary-stage cutaneous lesions that are classically asymptomatic.¹⁴ Additionally, our case was distinctive due to the lack of palmar or plantar involvement, which is considered a characteristic feature of secondary cutaneous syphilis.¹ Finally, our case was notable for the presence of multiple annular cutaneous lesions, which indicated a late secondary-stage infection during which involution of the lesions produced endarteritis as deeper vessels became involved. A 20-year retrospective study by Abell et al¹¹ demonstrated that 40% of syphilitic rashes are macular, 40% are maculopapular, 10% are papular (as in our case), and the remaining 10% are not easily grouped within these categories.

Differential Diagnosis
It has been estimated that approximately 8% of cutaneous syphilitic lesions demonstrate morphology and distributions suggestive of other dermatologic conditions, including atopic dermatitis, pityriasis rosea, psoriasis, drug-induced eruptions, erythema multiforme, mycosis fungoides, and far more uncommonly lichenoid lesions,^16,17 as in our case.

Histopathology
It has been demonstrated that the gross appearance of the secondary syphilitic lesion depends both on the degree of inflammatory infiltrate and the extent of vascular involvement producing ischemia of the skin.¹ Our case presented with small, flat-topped, papular lesions that grossly resembled lichen planus and were ultimately shown to be the product of dense lymphomononuclear infiltration extending perivascularly and throughout the superficial and deep dermis.

Biopsy of a lesion is one means of diagnosis, though the histologic appearance of secondary syphilis can mimic many other diseases. In primary and secondary syphilis, skin biopsy characteristically shows central thinning or ulceration of the epidermal layer with heavy dermal lymphocyte infiltration, lymphovascular proliferation with endarteritis, small-vessel thrombosis, and dermal necrosis. Lichen planus–type dermatitis is histologically characterized by hyperkeratosis, irregular epidermal hyperplasia, and a dermoepidermal junction that may be obscured by a dense lymphomononuclear infiltrate.⁹ The specimen taken from our patient showed minimal infiltrate in the papillary dermis, suggesting a diagnosis of secondary syphilis with lichenoid features. Despite a gross appearance consistent with lichen planus, the biopsy lacked the hydropic degeneration of the basal layer and keratinocyte necrosis that typically characterize this condition.

Diagnosis
Serologic testing for syphilis infection is comprised of nontreponemal and treponemal studies. Nontreponemal testing, which includes the RPR and VDRL test, detects antibodies to cardiolipin-lecithin antigen, a lipid component of the cell membranes of T pallidum. Because the specificity of these tests is fairly low, they typically are used only for screening and monitoring of disease progression and/or response to treatment. Approximately 25% of cases in the United States of primary syphilis are not detected by nontreponemal testing, whereas a nonreactive test nearly always excludes a diagnosis of secondary or latent-stage syphilitic infection.⁹ Indeed, nontreponemal studies show the highest antibody titers during the late secondary and early latent stages of infection with declining titers thereafter, even in the absence of antibiotic treatment. In our case, diagnosis was made by biopsy and RPR was used for staging; RPR was reactive at a dilution of 1:32, indicative of secondary or early latent infection.

Treponemal testing, which includes the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test, and multiplex flow immunoassay detects antibodies that are specific to syphilis infection. Treponemal antibodies are detectable earlier in the course of infection than nontreponemal antibodies and remain permanently detectable even following treatment. Because of its high specificity, treponemal testing often is used to confirm diagnosis after positive screening with nontreponemal tests.⁴ Positive fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption testing and positive multiplex flow immunoassay may be used to confirm the diagnosis of T pallidum infection.

The tertiary stage of syphilis infection can occur years after conclusion of the secondary stage and is comprised of one or more of the following: gummas, aortic dilatation or dissection, and neurosyphilitic manifestations such as tabes dorsalis or general paresis.¹ It is of vital importance to identify syphilis infection prior to the onset of the tertiary stage to prevent substantial morbidity and mortality.

Treatment
Our patient’s symptoms abated after empiric treatment with amoxicillin for presumed streptococcal throat infection after he presented to the emergency department with odynophagia, which is not surprising given the moderate-spectrum coverage of this β-lactam antibiotic as well as the near-complete susceptibility of Treponema spirochetes to amoxicillin in primary and secondary syphilis with notably lower efficacy in latent or tertiary disease. It was essential to treat the patient with a single dose of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million U, which has been shown to reliably prevent recurrence of infection or progression to tertiary syphilis.¹⁸

Conclusion

We present a rare case of lichenoid secondary syphilis in the absence of lesions on the palmar and plantar surfaces. The patient lacked any other cutaneous or systemic manifestations, except for odynophagia in association with oral mucosal lesions. He denied any new sexual partners and did not recall having a primary chancre. Also strikingly unusual in this case was the intense pruritus associated with the genital eruption, which is unlike the classic lack of symptoms experienced in the great majority of eruptions due to secondary syphilis. A clinical appreciation of the many cutaneous manifestations of syphilis infection remains critical to early identification of the disease prior to progression to the tertiary stage and its devastating sequelae.

Syphilis is a chronic systemic infection that has been allotted the epithet “the great imitator” for its gross and histologic similarity to numerous other skin pathologies. Well-characterized for centuries, syphilis features diverse clinical manifestations including a number of cutaneous symptoms.¹

RELATED AUDIOCAST: The Syphilis Epidemic: Dermatologists on the Frontline of Treatment and Diagnosis

The primary stage of infection is classically defined by an asymptomatic chancre at the inoculation site. The secondary stage results from the systemic dissemination of the infection and typically is characterized by cutaneous eruptions, regional lymphadenopathy, and flulike symptoms. This stage gained its notoriety as the great imitator owing to its ability to present with a variety of papulosquamous eruptions. The secondary stage is followed by an asymptomatic latent period that may last months to years, followed by the tertiary stage, which is characterized by the neurologic, cardiovascular, and/or gummatous manifestations that represent the major sources of morbidity and mortality associated with syphilis. It is during the primary, secondary, and early latent stages that the infection is communicable.¹

Case Report

A 40-year-old man presented with multiple intensely pruritic, scattered, erythematous and slightly violaceous, flat-topped papules on the scrotum (Figure 1A) and penile shaft (Figure 1B) of 1 week’s duration. Some of these lesions were annular in appearance. The patient denied any other dermatologic concerns and showed no other skin lesions. A shave biopsy of the right side of the penile shaft was performed, revealing minimal papillary dermis and superficial perivascular dermatitis with substantial perivascular plasmalymphocytic infiltration. The epidermal layer was mildly acanthotic with parakeratosis. A tentative diagnosis of secondary syphilis of unknown latency was made and confirmatory laboratory studies were ordered.

Within weeks, the patient developed a painful 7-mm white patch on the right lower mucosal lip followed several days later by the appearance of a painful lesion on the hard palate (Figure 2 [arrow indicates palatal lesion]) and odynophagia. He presented to the emergency department roughly 3 weeks from the time of index presentation and was started empirically on amoxicillin 500 mg 3 times daily for 10 days for suspicion of strep throat. At a scheduled follow-up with his dermatologist 1 week later, physical examination showed complete resolution of the mucosal lip patch and genital lesions. A round erythematous patch on the right hard palate consistent with a resolving mucosal patch also was noted. A diagnosis of secondary syphilitic infection was made with a rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer of 1:32 (reference range, <1:1) and positive Treponema antibodies. The patient was treated with a single dose of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million U to prevent the development of tertiary syphilis.

Comment

Incidence
Syphilis has been well characterized since the early 15th century, though its geographic origin remains a topic of controversy.² Although acquired syphilis infections represented a major source of morbidity and mortality in the early 20th century, the prevalence of syphilis in the United States declined substantially thereafter due to improved public health management.² Syphilis was relatively rare in the United States by the year 1956, with fewer than 7000 cases of primary and secondary disease reported annually.³ The incidence of primary and secondary syphilis infections in the United States increased gradually until 1990 before declining precipitously and reaching an unprecedented low of 2.2 cases per 100,000 individuals in 2000.⁴ These shifts ultimately have resulted in decreased clinical familiarity with the disease presentation of syphilis among many health care providers. Since 2000, the incidence of syphilis infection has increased in the United States, with the greatest increases seen in men who have sex with men, intravenous drug users, and human immunodeficiency virus–infected individuals.^5-7

RELATED ARTICLE: Syphilis and the Dermatologist

Pathogenesis and Transmission
The causative agent in syphilis infection is the bacterium Treponema pallidum, a member of the family Spirochaetaceae, which is distinguished by its thin, regularly coiled form and distinctive corkscrew motility.⁸ Syphilis is communicated primarily by sexual contact or in utero exposure during the primary and secondary stages of maternal infection.⁹ At the time of presentation, our patient denied having any new sexual partners or practices. He reported a monogamous heterosexual relationship within the months preceding presentation, suggesting historical inaccuracy on the part of the patient or probable infidelity in the reported relationship as an alternative means of infection transmission. Untreated individuals may be contagious for longer than 1 year,⁹ making transmission patterns difficult to track clinically.

Presentation
The clinical presentation of infection with T pallidum results from dual humoral and cell-mediated inflammatory responses in the host. The primary stage is classically defined by a single chancre, which develops at the inoculation site(s) 9 to 90 days following exposure. The chancre typically begins as a small papule that rapidly develops into a painless ulcer characterized by an indurated border, red base, bordering edema, and a diameter of 2 cm or less. Indolent regional lymphadenopathy often is observed in conjunction with the primary chancre.¹⁰ Our case is notable for the absence of a primary syphilitic lesion and lack of adenopathy. The primary chancre of syphilis typically resolves within 3 to 6 weeks of onset regardless of whether the patient is treated,⁴ thus suggesting the rare possibility that our patient developed a painless primary chancre without realizing it.

The secondary stage of syphilis infection arises weeks to months after resolution of the primary chancre and is triggered by hematogenous and lymphatic dissemination of the bacteria. The symptoms of secondary syphilis are primarily flulike and may include headache, malaise, fatigue, sore throat, arthralgia, and low-grade fever.⁹ Nontender regional lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly also have been reported.¹¹ Our patient denied any systemic concerns throughout the duration of his illness, with the exception of odynophagia in association with ulceration of the oral mucosa. Abnormal laboratory findings in secondary syphilis are nonspecific and may include an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and/or an increased white blood cell count with absolute lymphocytosis.¹² Laboratory studies drawn at the time of presentation showed no such abnormalities in our patient.

The cutaneous signs of secondary syphilis arise concurrently with systemic manifestations and are a common finding, with lesions of the skin or oral mucosa present in up to 80% of patients,¹³ as in our case. Oral lesions classically involve ulcerations at the tip and sides of the tongue,¹² which is distinct from our patient who developed oral lesions of the mucosal lip and hard palate.

Secondary syphilis classically features a copper-colored maculopapular rash with sharply delineated margins typically present on the palmar and plantar surfaces.¹⁴ Verrucous lesions appearing as moist exophytic plaques on the genitals, intertriginous areas, and/or perineum also have been described and are referred to as condyloma lata in the setting of secondary syphilis.¹⁵ In contrast to these classic findings, our patient demonstrated lichenoid lesions on the genitalia and white mucosal patches on the oral mucosa. Our case also was highly unusual because of the intense pruritus associated with the genital lesions, which starkly contrasts most secondary-stage cutaneous lesions that are classically asymptomatic.¹⁴ Additionally, our case was distinctive due to the lack of palmar or plantar involvement, which is considered a characteristic feature of secondary cutaneous syphilis.¹ Finally, our case was notable for the presence of multiple annular cutaneous lesions, which indicated a late secondary-stage infection during which involution of the lesions produced endarteritis as deeper vessels became involved. A 20-year retrospective study by Abell et al¹¹ demonstrated that 40% of syphilitic rashes are macular, 40% are maculopapular, 10% are papular (as in our case), and the remaining 10% are not easily grouped within these categories.

Differential Diagnosis
It has been estimated that approximately 8% of cutaneous syphilitic lesions demonstrate morphology and distributions suggestive of other dermatologic conditions, including atopic dermatitis, pityriasis rosea, psoriasis, drug-induced eruptions, erythema multiforme, mycosis fungoides, and far more uncommonly lichenoid lesions,^16,17 as in our case.

Histopathology
It has been demonstrated that the gross appearance of the secondary syphilitic lesion depends both on the degree of inflammatory infiltrate and the extent of vascular involvement producing ischemia of the skin.¹ Our case presented with small, flat-topped, papular lesions that grossly resembled lichen planus and were ultimately shown to be the product of dense lymphomononuclear infiltration extending perivascularly and throughout the superficial and deep dermis.

Biopsy of a lesion is one means of diagnosis, though the histologic appearance of secondary syphilis can mimic many other diseases. In primary and secondary syphilis, skin biopsy characteristically shows central thinning or ulceration of the epidermal layer with heavy dermal lymphocyte infiltration, lymphovascular proliferation with endarteritis, small-vessel thrombosis, and dermal necrosis. Lichen planus–type dermatitis is histologically characterized by hyperkeratosis, irregular epidermal hyperplasia, and a dermoepidermal junction that may be obscured by a dense lymphomononuclear infiltrate.⁹ The specimen taken from our patient showed minimal infiltrate in the papillary dermis, suggesting a diagnosis of secondary syphilis with lichenoid features. Despite a gross appearance consistent with lichen planus, the biopsy lacked the hydropic degeneration of the basal layer and keratinocyte necrosis that typically characterize this condition.

Diagnosis
Serologic testing for syphilis infection is comprised of nontreponemal and treponemal studies. Nontreponemal testing, which includes the RPR and VDRL test, detects antibodies to cardiolipin-lecithin antigen, a lipid component of the cell membranes of T pallidum. Because the specificity of these tests is fairly low, they typically are used only for screening and monitoring of disease progression and/or response to treatment. Approximately 25% of cases in the United States of primary syphilis are not detected by nontreponemal testing, whereas a nonreactive test nearly always excludes a diagnosis of secondary or latent-stage syphilitic infection.⁹ Indeed, nontreponemal studies show the highest antibody titers during the late secondary and early latent stages of infection with declining titers thereafter, even in the absence of antibiotic treatment. In our case, diagnosis was made by biopsy and RPR was used for staging; RPR was reactive at a dilution of 1:32, indicative of secondary or early latent infection.

Treponemal testing, which includes the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test, and multiplex flow immunoassay detects antibodies that are specific to syphilis infection. Treponemal antibodies are detectable earlier in the course of infection than nontreponemal antibodies and remain permanently detectable even following treatment. Because of its high specificity, treponemal testing often is used to confirm diagnosis after positive screening with nontreponemal tests.⁴ Positive fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption testing and positive multiplex flow immunoassay may be used to confirm the diagnosis of T pallidum infection.

The tertiary stage of syphilis infection can occur years after conclusion of the secondary stage and is comprised of one or more of the following: gummas, aortic dilatation or dissection, and neurosyphilitic manifestations such as tabes dorsalis or general paresis.¹ It is of vital importance to identify syphilis infection prior to the onset of the tertiary stage to prevent substantial morbidity and mortality.

Treatment
Our patient’s symptoms abated after empiric treatment with amoxicillin for presumed streptococcal throat infection after he presented to the emergency department with odynophagia, which is not surprising given the moderate-spectrum coverage of this β-lactam antibiotic as well as the near-complete susceptibility of Treponema spirochetes to amoxicillin in primary and secondary syphilis with notably lower efficacy in latent or tertiary disease. It was essential to treat the patient with a single dose of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million U, which has been shown to reliably prevent recurrence of infection or progression to tertiary syphilis.¹⁸

Conclusion

We present a rare case of lichenoid secondary syphilis in the absence of lesions on the palmar and plantar surfaces. The patient lacked any other cutaneous or systemic manifestations, except for odynophagia in association with oral mucosal lesions. He denied any new sexual partners and did not recall having a primary chancre. Also strikingly unusual in this case was the intense pruritus associated with the genital eruption, which is unlike the classic lack of symptoms experienced in the great majority of eruptions due to secondary syphilis. A clinical appreciation of the many cutaneous manifestations of syphilis infection remains critical to early identification of the disease prior to progression to the tertiary stage and its devastating sequelae.

GENEVA – An oral reversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor known as PRN1008 showed promising efficacy and safety for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris in an interim analysis of an ongoing small-to-date, open-label phase 2 study, according to DeDee Murrell, MD.

PRN1008 is a designer drug intended as an alternative to the long-standing standard therapy for pemphigus, months to years of moderate- or high-dose systemic corticosteroids, with all the debilitating side effects that sledgehammer approach often brings, she said at the annual congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

[email protected]


 

GENEVA – An oral reversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor known as PRN1008 showed promising efficacy and safety for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris in an interim analysis of an ongoing small-to-date, open-label phase 2 study, according to DeDee Murrell, MD.

PRN1008 is a designer drug intended as an alternative to the long-standing standard therapy for pemphigus, months to years of moderate- or high-dose systemic corticosteroids, with all the debilitating side effects that sledgehammer approach often brings, she said at the annual congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

[email protected]


 

GENEVA – An oral reversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor known as PRN1008 showed promising efficacy and safety for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris in an interim analysis of an ongoing small-to-date, open-label phase 2 study, according to DeDee Murrell, MD.

PRN1008 is a designer drug intended as an alternative to the long-standing standard therapy for pemphigus, months to years of moderate- or high-dose systemic corticosteroids, with all the debilitating side effects that sledgehammer approach often brings, she said at the annual congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

[email protected]


 

U.S. jurisdictions are letting pharmacists dispense more vaccines to younger patients with less direct prescriber oversight but barriers remain.

Since the 1990s, states have made laws to increase access to immunization services by giving pharmacists authority to give vaccines, said Cason D. Schmit, JD, of Texas A&M University at College Station, and Matthew S. Penn, JD, director of the Public Health Law Program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. This has the advantage of pharmacies being open longer hours than most physicians’ offices, in addition to the opportunities for immunizing people in rural locations as well as those people without a regular physician.

copyright itsmejust/Thinkstock

U.S. jurisdictions are letting pharmacists dispense more vaccines to younger patients with less direct prescriber oversight but barriers remain.

Since the 1990s, states have made laws to increase access to immunization services by giving pharmacists authority to give vaccines, said Cason D. Schmit, JD, of Texas A&M University at College Station, and Matthew S. Penn, JD, director of the Public Health Law Program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. This has the advantage of pharmacies being open longer hours than most physicians’ offices, in addition to the opportunities for immunizing people in rural locations as well as those people without a regular physician.

copyright itsmejust/Thinkstock

U.S. jurisdictions are letting pharmacists dispense more vaccines to younger patients with less direct prescriber oversight but barriers remain.

Since the 1990s, states have made laws to increase access to immunization services by giving pharmacists authority to give vaccines, said Cason D. Schmit, JD, of Texas A&M University at College Station, and Matthew S. Penn, JD, director of the Public Health Law Program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. This has the advantage of pharmacies being open longer hours than most physicians’ offices, in addition to the opportunities for immunizing people in rural locations as well as those people without a regular physician.

copyright itsmejust/Thinkstock

SAN ANTONIO – A novel antibody drug conjugate has shown promise in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), according to new findings presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

Sacituzumab govitecan, a novel antibody-drug conjugate, demonstrated significant clinical activity when used as a single agent among patients with relapsed/refractory disease who had already received multiple lines of therapy. The objective response rate in a cohort of more than 100 patients was 34%, and that included 3 complete responses and 34 partial responses.

“Sacituzumab govitecan demonstrated significant single-agent activity in this population,” said lead author Aditya Bardia, MD, of Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center.

“Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis that tends to affect young women,” said Dr. Bardia. “Visceral and brain metastases are very common. Currently there is no single standard chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.”

He noted that the response rates to standard chemotherapy are low and that median progression-free survival is in the range of 2-3 months. The response rate to standard chemotherapy first line and beyond, based on available data, is in the range of 6-15%.

“Consequently, there is a large unmet need in the breast cancer community,” said Dr. Bardia.

Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) is an antitrophoblastic cell-surface antigen (anti–Trop-2) and humanized antibody-SN-38 conjugate, which is the active metabolite of the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan. Trop-2 is highly expressed in most epithelial cancers, including TNBC. A phase 1/2 basket trial was previously conducted in a cohort with multiple, advanced epithelial cancers and showed encouraging activity.

Dr. Bardia and his group also published preliminary results earlier this year in patients with metastatic TNBC, which showed an objective response rate of 30%, and last year, sacituzumab govitecan was granted Breakthrough Designation by the Food and Drug Administration. In the current study, the authors expanded the cohort and looked at a more defined population (third-line setting or greater in metastatic TNBC).

In this study, 110 patients who had metastatic TNBC (109 female, 1 male) and had received two or more lines of therapy for metastatic disease were enrolled between July 2013 and February 2017. The cohort included 53 patients from the investigators’ previously reported study in metastatic TNBC (n=69 total). As of this study’s cutoff date (June 30, 2017), 66 patients had died, 30 were in long term follow up, and 14 were still on treatment.

All patients were treated at the 10 mg/kg dose level, receiving 14.5 median doses (range, 1-88) over a median duration of 4.9 months. Treatment was administered on day 1 and 8 in a 21 day cycle, until progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Within the cohort of this heavily pretreated group, 41% received sacituzumab govitecan as third-line therapy while 59% received it at fourth line or more. The majority of patients had previously received taxanes or anthracyclines, and of note, 75% had previously received prior platinum, and 17% had previously received checkpoint inhibitors.

The clinical benefit rate, calculated using the rate of complete and partial response and stable disease greater than 6 months, was 45%. Responses were durable, with a median duration of 7.6 months by local assessment and 9.1 months by central review.

The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval, 4.8-6.6) and median overall survival was 12.7 months (95% CI, 10.8-13.6). Of the long term responders, nine have been progression free for more than a year, and four for more than 2 years. At the time of data cutoff, 12 responders were still receiving treatment.

Of note, Dr. Bardia said, patients stayed on sacituzumab govitecan longer than they had stayed on their most recent previous therapy.

The authors also conducted an exploratory subset analysis but found no difference in response when looking at age, prior regimens, onset of metastasis, the presence of visceral involvement at study entry, or Trop-2 expression.

Response among patients who had previously received checkpoint inhibitors was 47%, but Dr. Bardia cautions that “these numbers are small.”

Treatment with sacituzumab govitecan was well tolerated overall, with 2 patients discontinuing the drug because of related toxicity, and no antidrug antibodies detected. Grade 3 or greater toxicity included neutropenia (39%), leukopenia (14%), and anemia (10%); the incidence of febrile neutropenia was low (7%). There was a high rate of gastrointestinal related toxicity, but the majority were grade 1-2, and the rate of grade 3-4 “was in the single digits, ranging from 5-8%,” said Dr. Bardia. There were no drug-related deaths.

Given the high unmet medical need among patients with metastatic TNBC, data from this trial is being sent to the FDA to be considered for accelerated approval, and a global confirmatory randomized Phase 3 is now underway. “The ASCENT trial is recruiting in the United States right now,” said Dr. Bardia; this trial will include patients with metastatic TNBC who will receive either sacituzumab govitecan or physician’s choice of standard therapy.

Additional studies including rational combinations are currently being evaluated for metastatic TNBC and other breast cancer subsets. 

SOURCE: Bardia A et al. Abstract GS1-07.

SAN ANTONIO – A novel antibody drug conjugate has shown promise in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), according to new findings presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

Sacituzumab govitecan, a novel antibody-drug conjugate, demonstrated significant clinical activity when used as a single agent among patients with relapsed/refractory disease who had already received multiple lines of therapy. The objective response rate in a cohort of more than 100 patients was 34%, and that included 3 complete responses and 34 partial responses.

“Sacituzumab govitecan demonstrated significant single-agent activity in this population,” said lead author Aditya Bardia, MD, of Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center.

“Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis that tends to affect young women,” said Dr. Bardia. “Visceral and brain metastases are very common. Currently there is no single standard chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.”

He noted that the response rates to standard chemotherapy are low and that median progression-free survival is in the range of 2-3 months. The response rate to standard chemotherapy first line and beyond, based on available data, is in the range of 6-15%.

“Consequently, there is a large unmet need in the breast cancer community,” said Dr. Bardia.

Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) is an antitrophoblastic cell-surface antigen (anti–Trop-2) and humanized antibody-SN-38 conjugate, which is the active metabolite of the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan. Trop-2 is highly expressed in most epithelial cancers, including TNBC. A phase 1/2 basket trial was previously conducted in a cohort with multiple, advanced epithelial cancers and showed encouraging activity.

Dr. Bardia and his group also published preliminary results earlier this year in patients with metastatic TNBC, which showed an objective response rate of 30%, and last year, sacituzumab govitecan was granted Breakthrough Designation by the Food and Drug Administration. In the current study, the authors expanded the cohort and looked at a more defined population (third-line setting or greater in metastatic TNBC).

In this study, 110 patients who had metastatic TNBC (109 female, 1 male) and had received two or more lines of therapy for metastatic disease were enrolled between July 2013 and February 2017. The cohort included 53 patients from the investigators’ previously reported study in metastatic TNBC (n=69 total). As of this study’s cutoff date (June 30, 2017), 66 patients had died, 30 were in long term follow up, and 14 were still on treatment.

All patients were treated at the 10 mg/kg dose level, receiving 14.5 median doses (range, 1-88) over a median duration of 4.9 months. Treatment was administered on day 1 and 8 in a 21 day cycle, until progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Within the cohort of this heavily pretreated group, 41% received sacituzumab govitecan as third-line therapy while 59% received it at fourth line or more. The majority of patients had previously received taxanes or anthracyclines, and of note, 75% had previously received prior platinum, and 17% had previously received checkpoint inhibitors.

The clinical benefit rate, calculated using the rate of complete and partial response and stable disease greater than 6 months, was 45%. Responses were durable, with a median duration of 7.6 months by local assessment and 9.1 months by central review.

The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval, 4.8-6.6) and median overall survival was 12.7 months (95% CI, 10.8-13.6). Of the long term responders, nine have been progression free for more than a year, and four for more than 2 years. At the time of data cutoff, 12 responders were still receiving treatment.

Of note, Dr. Bardia said, patients stayed on sacituzumab govitecan longer than they had stayed on their most recent previous therapy.

The authors also conducted an exploratory subset analysis but found no difference in response when looking at age, prior regimens, onset of metastasis, the presence of visceral involvement at study entry, or Trop-2 expression.

Response among patients who had previously received checkpoint inhibitors was 47%, but Dr. Bardia cautions that “these numbers are small.”

Treatment with sacituzumab govitecan was well tolerated overall, with 2 patients discontinuing the drug because of related toxicity, and no antidrug antibodies detected. Grade 3 or greater toxicity included neutropenia (39%), leukopenia (14%), and anemia (10%); the incidence of febrile neutropenia was low (7%). There was a high rate of gastrointestinal related toxicity, but the majority were grade 1-2, and the rate of grade 3-4 “was in the single digits, ranging from 5-8%,” said Dr. Bardia. There were no drug-related deaths.

Given the high unmet medical need among patients with metastatic TNBC, data from this trial is being sent to the FDA to be considered for accelerated approval, and a global confirmatory randomized Phase 3 is now underway. “The ASCENT trial is recruiting in the United States right now,” said Dr. Bardia; this trial will include patients with metastatic TNBC who will receive either sacituzumab govitecan or physician’s choice of standard therapy.

Additional studies including rational combinations are currently being evaluated for metastatic TNBC and other breast cancer subsets. 

SOURCE: Bardia A et al. Abstract GS1-07.

SAN ANTONIO – A novel antibody drug conjugate has shown promise in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), according to new findings presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

Sacituzumab govitecan, a novel antibody-drug conjugate, demonstrated significant clinical activity when used as a single agent among patients with relapsed/refractory disease who had already received multiple lines of therapy. The objective response rate in a cohort of more than 100 patients was 34%, and that included 3 complete responses and 34 partial responses.

“Sacituzumab govitecan demonstrated significant single-agent activity in this population,” said lead author Aditya Bardia, MD, of Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center.

“Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis that tends to affect young women,” said Dr. Bardia. “Visceral and brain metastases are very common. Currently there is no single standard chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.”

He noted that the response rates to standard chemotherapy are low and that median progression-free survival is in the range of 2-3 months. The response rate to standard chemotherapy first line and beyond, based on available data, is in the range of 6-15%.

“Consequently, there is a large unmet need in the breast cancer community,” said Dr. Bardia.

Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) is an antitrophoblastic cell-surface antigen (anti–Trop-2) and humanized antibody-SN-38 conjugate, which is the active metabolite of the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan. Trop-2 is highly expressed in most epithelial cancers, including TNBC. A phase 1/2 basket trial was previously conducted in a cohort with multiple, advanced epithelial cancers and showed encouraging activity.

Dr. Bardia and his group also published preliminary results earlier this year in patients with metastatic TNBC, which showed an objective response rate of 30%, and last year, sacituzumab govitecan was granted Breakthrough Designation by the Food and Drug Administration. In the current study, the authors expanded the cohort and looked at a more defined population (third-line setting or greater in metastatic TNBC).

In this study, 110 patients who had metastatic TNBC (109 female, 1 male) and had received two or more lines of therapy for metastatic disease were enrolled between July 2013 and February 2017. The cohort included 53 patients from the investigators’ previously reported study in metastatic TNBC (n=69 total). As of this study’s cutoff date (June 30, 2017), 66 patients had died, 30 were in long term follow up, and 14 were still on treatment.

All patients were treated at the 10 mg/kg dose level, receiving 14.5 median doses (range, 1-88) over a median duration of 4.9 months. Treatment was administered on day 1 and 8 in a 21 day cycle, until progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Within the cohort of this heavily pretreated group, 41% received sacituzumab govitecan as third-line therapy while 59% received it at fourth line or more. The majority of patients had previously received taxanes or anthracyclines, and of note, 75% had previously received prior platinum, and 17% had previously received checkpoint inhibitors.

The clinical benefit rate, calculated using the rate of complete and partial response and stable disease greater than 6 months, was 45%. Responses were durable, with a median duration of 7.6 months by local assessment and 9.1 months by central review.

The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval, 4.8-6.6) and median overall survival was 12.7 months (95% CI, 10.8-13.6). Of the long term responders, nine have been progression free for more than a year, and four for more than 2 years. At the time of data cutoff, 12 responders were still receiving treatment.

Of note, Dr. Bardia said, patients stayed on sacituzumab govitecan longer than they had stayed on their most recent previous therapy.

The authors also conducted an exploratory subset analysis but found no difference in response when looking at age, prior regimens, onset of metastasis, the presence of visceral involvement at study entry, or Trop-2 expression.

Response among patients who had previously received checkpoint inhibitors was 47%, but Dr. Bardia cautions that “these numbers are small.”

Treatment with sacituzumab govitecan was well tolerated overall, with 2 patients discontinuing the drug because of related toxicity, and no antidrug antibodies detected. Grade 3 or greater toxicity included neutropenia (39%), leukopenia (14%), and anemia (10%); the incidence of febrile neutropenia was low (7%). There was a high rate of gastrointestinal related toxicity, but the majority were grade 1-2, and the rate of grade 3-4 “was in the single digits, ranging from 5-8%,” said Dr. Bardia. There were no drug-related deaths.

Given the high unmet medical need among patients with metastatic TNBC, data from this trial is being sent to the FDA to be considered for accelerated approval, and a global confirmatory randomized Phase 3 is now underway. “The ASCENT trial is recruiting in the United States right now,” said Dr. Bardia; this trial will include patients with metastatic TNBC who will receive either sacituzumab govitecan or physician’s choice of standard therapy.

Additional studies including rational combinations are currently being evaluated for metastatic TNBC and other breast cancer subsets. 

SOURCE: Bardia A et al. Abstract GS1-07.

Parents generally can take photographs of good enough quality to allow accurate teledermatology diagnoses to be made of many pediatric skin conditions, said Daniel M. O’Connor, MD, of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and his associates.

Skin conditions make up 10%-30% of the approximately 200 million pediatric outpatient visits each year, Dr. O’Connor and his colleagues said. But there are fewer than 300 board-certified U.S. pediatric dermatologists for the nation’s nearly 75 million children. So, the possibility of using photos taken by parents for distant pediatric dermatologists to assess is an attractive one.

copyright/Thinkstock.com

Parents generally can take photographs of good enough quality to allow accurate teledermatology diagnoses to be made of many pediatric skin conditions, said Daniel M. O’Connor, MD, of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and his associates.

Skin conditions make up 10%-30% of the approximately 200 million pediatric outpatient visits each year, Dr. O’Connor and his colleagues said. But there are fewer than 300 board-certified U.S. pediatric dermatologists for the nation’s nearly 75 million children. So, the possibility of using photos taken by parents for distant pediatric dermatologists to assess is an attractive one.

copyright/Thinkstock.com

Parents generally can take photographs of good enough quality to allow accurate teledermatology diagnoses to be made of many pediatric skin conditions, said Daniel M. O’Connor, MD, of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and his associates.

Skin conditions make up 10%-30% of the approximately 200 million pediatric outpatient visits each year, Dr. O’Connor and his colleagues said. But there are fewer than 300 board-certified U.S. pediatric dermatologists for the nation’s nearly 75 million children. So, the possibility of using photos taken by parents for distant pediatric dermatologists to assess is an attractive one.

copyright/Thinkstock.com

Patients with nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) who enter remission on adalimumab are likely to relapse if the medication is withdrawn – and many won’t attain remission again, even if the drug is restarted.

However, the findings of the ABILITY-3 trial do offer an intriguing potential, Robert Landewé, MD, PhD, said at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology. About 30% of the study group did maintain remission after adalimumab (Humira) withdrawal, suggesting that at least a portion of these patients can stay in good clinical shape off TNF inhibition.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Landewé R et al. ACR 2017 Abstract 1787.

Patients with nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) who enter remission on adalimumab are likely to relapse if the medication is withdrawn – and many won’t attain remission again, even if the drug is restarted.

However, the findings of the ABILITY-3 trial do offer an intriguing potential, Robert Landewé, MD, PhD, said at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology. About 30% of the study group did maintain remission after adalimumab (Humira) withdrawal, suggesting that at least a portion of these patients can stay in good clinical shape off TNF inhibition.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Landewé R et al. ACR 2017 Abstract 1787.

Patients with nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) who enter remission on adalimumab are likely to relapse if the medication is withdrawn – and many won’t attain remission again, even if the drug is restarted.

However, the findings of the ABILITY-3 trial do offer an intriguing potential, Robert Landewé, MD, PhD, said at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology. About 30% of the study group did maintain remission after adalimumab (Humira) withdrawal, suggesting that at least a portion of these patients can stay in good clinical shape off TNF inhibition.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Landewé R et al. ACR 2017 Abstract 1787.

There are currently 15 drugs indicated for adverse conditions of the urinary tract. The reported frequency of use in pregnancy and during breastfeeding for most of these agents is very low or completely absent.

The five subclasses of urinary tract agents are analgesics, antispasmodics, urinary acidifiers, urinary alkalinizers, and urinary germicides. With the exception of the three urinary germicides, anti-infectives are not covered in this column.

Analgesics

The analgesic subclass includes pentosan and phenazopyridine. Pentosan (Elmiron), a heparinlike compound, is an oral drug that is indicated for the relief of bladder pain or discomfort associated with interstitial cystitis. Systemic absorption is low, at about 6%. Because of the high molecular weight (4,000-6,000), it does not appear to cross the placenta, at least in the first half of pregnancy. A 1975 reference described its use in five women with preeclampsia. Each patient received 100 mg intramuscularly every 8 hours for about 5 days in the last weeks of pregnancy. No maternal benefit from the therapy was observed. There was apparently no fetal harm, but the neonatal outcomes were not described.

There are substantial – more than 900 – human pregnancy exposures in the first trimester with phenazopyridine. The exposures were not related to an increased risk of embryo-fetal harm and so use of the drug in pregnancy can be classified as compatible. However, the low molecular weight (about 214 for the free base) suggests that the drug will cross to the embryo and fetus.
 

Antispasmodics

The eight antispasmodics are darifenacin (Enablex), fesoterodine (Toviaz), flavoxate, mirabegron (Myrbetriq), oxybutynin (Ditropan XL), solifenacin (Vesicare), tolterodine (Detrol LA), and trospium.

These agents are indicated for the treatment of overactive bladder with symptoms of urge urinary incontinence, urgency, and frequency. The molecular weights range between 342 and 508, suggesting that all will cross the human placenta. There are no human pregnancy data for six of these agents and very limited data for flavoxate and oxybutynin. There is no evidence of embryo-fetal harm from these two drugs, but only one case involved exposure in the first trimester.

In seven of these drugs, the animal data suggested low risk. There was no embryo harm from doses that were equal to or less than 10 times the human dose based on body surface area (BSA) or area under the concentration curve (AUC). Solifenacin did cause embryo toxicity in pregnant mice. There was no embryo toxicity in pregnant rats and rabbits, but the maximum doses used were very low. Overall, the available data suggest that exposure to an antispasmodic in pregnancy is low risk for embryo, fetal, and newborn harm.
 

Urinary acidifiers

Ammonium chloride is a urinary acidifier as well as a respiratory expectorant. There is a large amount of data related to when the drug was used as an expectorant. There was no evidence that this use was associated with large categories of major or minor malformations. However, there were possible associations with three individual defects: inguinal hernia, cataract, and any benign tumor. No reports describing its use as a urinary acidifier have been located. When large amounts are consumed near term, the drug may cause acidosis in the mother and fetus. The molecular weight (about 53) suggests that it will cross the placenta.

Urinary alkalinizers

Potassium citrate (Urocit-K) is indicated for the management of renal tubular acidosis with calcium stones, hypocitraturic calcium oxalate with nephrolithiasis of any etiology, and uric acid lithiasis with or without calcium stones. The molecular weight (about 307) suggests it will cross the placenta. Only one case of its use in pregnancy has been located. The newborn had an unspecified defect but no other information was provided. The animal data in four species suggest low risk.

Urinary germicides

There are three urinary germicides: methenamine, methylene blue, and nitrofurantoin. Methenamine is available as methenamine mandelate (molecular weight abut 292) and methenamine hippurate (molecular weight about 319). Both are metabolized to formaldehyde (molecular weight about 30), the active agent. The molecular weights suggest that all will cross the placenta. The use of methenamine during pregnancy has been reported in more than 750 pregnancies. There have been no embryo or fetal adverse effects attributed to the drug.

The human data involving oral methylene blue, a weak urinary germicide, is limited to 55 exposures. There were three infants with birth defects (type not specified). Several reports have described the use of intra-amniotic injections to assist in the diagnosis of suspected membrane rupture. This use has resulted in newborns with hemolytic anemia, hyperbilirubinemia with or without Heinz body formation, blue staining of the skin, and methemoglobinemia. Fetal deaths have also been described. Recommendations to avoid the intra-amniotic use of methylene blue were issued more than 10 years ago. Moreover, the use of oral methylene blue as a urinary germicide is no longer recommended.

The low molecular weight (about 238) of nitrofurantoin suggests that it will cross the placenta. It is commonly used in pregnancy for the treatment or prophylaxis of urinary tract infections. The large amount of human data indicates that the risk of drug-induced birth defects is low. Several cohort studies have found no increased risk for birth defects. However, some case-control studies have found increased risks for hypoplastic left heart syndrome and oral clefts. A 2015 review concluded that this difference was due to the increased sensitivity of case-control studies to detect adverse effects (J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Feb;37[2]:150-6).

Use of the drug close to term may cause hemolytic anemia in newborns who are glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficient. Although rare, this may also occur in newborns who are not G6PD deficient. The best course is to avoid use of the drug close to delivery. As for use of the drug in the first trimester, ACOG’s Committee on Obstetric Practice stated in Committee Opinion No. 717 that nitrofurantoin was still thought to be appropriate when no other suitable alternative antibiotics were available (Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sept;130[3]:666-7).
 

Breastfeeding

Except for methenamine and nitrofurantoin, there are no data related to the use of the urinary tract drugs during breastfeeding. Peak levels of methenamine occur at 1 hour, but no reports of adverse effects on nursing infants have been located. Several reports have described the use of nitrofurantoin during breastfeeding. Minor diarrhea was noted in two infants. However, breastfeeding an infant with G6PD deficiency could lead to hemolytic anemia.

Phenazopyridine should be used with caution especially for an infant younger than 1 month or with G6PD deficiency because of the risk for methemoglobinemia, sulfhemoglobinemia, and hemolytic anemia.

Although there have been no reports of the use of mirabegron during lactation, the characteristics of the drug – low molecular weight (about 397), long elimination half life (50 hours), and moderate plasma protein binding (about 71%) – suggest that the drug will be excreted into milk, potentially in clinically significant amounts. There is also concern with use of tolterodine (molecular weight about 476) because both the primary drug and its equipotent metabolite may be excreted into milk.
 

Mr. Briggs is a clinical professor of pharmacy at the University of California, San Francisco, and an adjunct professor of pharmacy at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, as well as at Washington State University, Spokane. He coauthored “Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation” and coedited “Diseases, Complications, and Drug Therapy in Obstetrics.” He reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

There are currently 15 drugs indicated for adverse conditions of the urinary tract. The reported frequency of use in pregnancy and during breastfeeding for most of these agents is very low or completely absent.

The five subclasses of urinary tract agents are analgesics, antispasmodics, urinary acidifiers, urinary alkalinizers, and urinary germicides. With the exception of the three urinary germicides, anti-infectives are not covered in this column.

Analgesics

The analgesic subclass includes pentosan and phenazopyridine. Pentosan (Elmiron), a heparinlike compound, is an oral drug that is indicated for the relief of bladder pain or discomfort associated with interstitial cystitis. Systemic absorption is low, at about 6%. Because of the high molecular weight (4,000-6,000), it does not appear to cross the placenta, at least in the first half of pregnancy. A 1975 reference described its use in five women with preeclampsia. Each patient received 100 mg intramuscularly every 8 hours for about 5 days in the last weeks of pregnancy. No maternal benefit from the therapy was observed. There was apparently no fetal harm, but the neonatal outcomes were not described.

There are substantial – more than 900 – human pregnancy exposures in the first trimester with phenazopyridine. The exposures were not related to an increased risk of embryo-fetal harm and so use of the drug in pregnancy can be classified as compatible. However, the low molecular weight (about 214 for the free base) suggests that the drug will cross to the embryo and fetus.
 

Antispasmodics

The eight antispasmodics are darifenacin (Enablex), fesoterodine (Toviaz), flavoxate, mirabegron (Myrbetriq), oxybutynin (Ditropan XL), solifenacin (Vesicare), tolterodine (Detrol LA), and trospium.

These agents are indicated for the treatment of overactive bladder with symptoms of urge urinary incontinence, urgency, and frequency. The molecular weights range between 342 and 508, suggesting that all will cross the human placenta. There are no human pregnancy data for six of these agents and very limited data for flavoxate and oxybutynin. There is no evidence of embryo-fetal harm from these two drugs, but only one case involved exposure in the first trimester.

In seven of these drugs, the animal data suggested low risk. There was no embryo harm from doses that were equal to or less than 10 times the human dose based on body surface area (BSA) or area under the concentration curve (AUC). Solifenacin did cause embryo toxicity in pregnant mice. There was no embryo toxicity in pregnant rats and rabbits, but the maximum doses used were very low. Overall, the available data suggest that exposure to an antispasmodic in pregnancy is low risk for embryo, fetal, and newborn harm.
 

Urinary acidifiers

Ammonium chloride is a urinary acidifier as well as a respiratory expectorant. There is a large amount of data related to when the drug was used as an expectorant. There was no evidence that this use was associated with large categories of major or minor malformations. However, there were possible associations with three individual defects: inguinal hernia, cataract, and any benign tumor. No reports describing its use as a urinary acidifier have been located. When large amounts are consumed near term, the drug may cause acidosis in the mother and fetus. The molecular weight (about 53) suggests that it will cross the placenta.

Urinary alkalinizers

Potassium citrate (Urocit-K) is indicated for the management of renal tubular acidosis with calcium stones, hypocitraturic calcium oxalate with nephrolithiasis of any etiology, and uric acid lithiasis with or without calcium stones. The molecular weight (about 307) suggests it will cross the placenta. Only one case of its use in pregnancy has been located. The newborn had an unspecified defect but no other information was provided. The animal data in four species suggest low risk.

Urinary germicides

There are three urinary germicides: methenamine, methylene blue, and nitrofurantoin. Methenamine is available as methenamine mandelate (molecular weight abut 292) and methenamine hippurate (molecular weight about 319). Both are metabolized to formaldehyde (molecular weight about 30), the active agent. The molecular weights suggest that all will cross the placenta. The use of methenamine during pregnancy has been reported in more than 750 pregnancies. There have been no embryo or fetal adverse effects attributed to the drug.

The human data involving oral methylene blue, a weak urinary germicide, is limited to 55 exposures. There were three infants with birth defects (type not specified). Several reports have described the use of intra-amniotic injections to assist in the diagnosis of suspected membrane rupture. This use has resulted in newborns with hemolytic anemia, hyperbilirubinemia with or without Heinz body formation, blue staining of the skin, and methemoglobinemia. Fetal deaths have also been described. Recommendations to avoid the intra-amniotic use of methylene blue were issued more than 10 years ago. Moreover, the use of oral methylene blue as a urinary germicide is no longer recommended.

The low molecular weight (about 238) of nitrofurantoin suggests that it will cross the placenta. It is commonly used in pregnancy for the treatment or prophylaxis of urinary tract infections. The large amount of human data indicates that the risk of drug-induced birth defects is low. Several cohort studies have found no increased risk for birth defects. However, some case-control studies have found increased risks for hypoplastic left heart syndrome and oral clefts. A 2015 review concluded that this difference was due to the increased sensitivity of case-control studies to detect adverse effects (J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Feb;37[2]:150-6).

Use of the drug close to term may cause hemolytic anemia in newborns who are glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficient. Although rare, this may also occur in newborns who are not G6PD deficient. The best course is to avoid use of the drug close to delivery. As for use of the drug in the first trimester, ACOG’s Committee on Obstetric Practice stated in Committee Opinion No. 717 that nitrofurantoin was still thought to be appropriate when no other suitable alternative antibiotics were available (Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sept;130[3]:666-7).
 

Breastfeeding

Except for methenamine and nitrofurantoin, there are no data related to the use of the urinary tract drugs during breastfeeding. Peak levels of methenamine occur at 1 hour, but no reports of adverse effects on nursing infants have been located. Several reports have described the use of nitrofurantoin during breastfeeding. Minor diarrhea was noted in two infants. However, breastfeeding an infant with G6PD deficiency could lead to hemolytic anemia.

Phenazopyridine should be used with caution especially for an infant younger than 1 month or with G6PD deficiency because of the risk for methemoglobinemia, sulfhemoglobinemia, and hemolytic anemia.

Although there have been no reports of the use of mirabegron during lactation, the characteristics of the drug – low molecular weight (about 397), long elimination half life (50 hours), and moderate plasma protein binding (about 71%) – suggest that the drug will be excreted into milk, potentially in clinically significant amounts. There is also concern with use of tolterodine (molecular weight about 476) because both the primary drug and its equipotent metabolite may be excreted into milk.
 

Mr. Briggs is a clinical professor of pharmacy at the University of California, San Francisco, and an adjunct professor of pharmacy at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, as well as at Washington State University, Spokane. He coauthored “Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation” and coedited “Diseases, Complications, and Drug Therapy in Obstetrics.” He reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

There are currently 15 drugs indicated for adverse conditions of the urinary tract. The reported frequency of use in pregnancy and during breastfeeding for most of these agents is very low or completely absent.

The five subclasses of urinary tract agents are analgesics, antispasmodics, urinary acidifiers, urinary alkalinizers, and urinary germicides. With the exception of the three urinary germicides, anti-infectives are not covered in this column.

Analgesics

The analgesic subclass includes pentosan and phenazopyridine. Pentosan (Elmiron), a heparinlike compound, is an oral drug that is indicated for the relief of bladder pain or discomfort associated with interstitial cystitis. Systemic absorption is low, at about 6%. Because of the high molecular weight (4,000-6,000), it does not appear to cross the placenta, at least in the first half of pregnancy. A 1975 reference described its use in five women with preeclampsia. Each patient received 100 mg intramuscularly every 8 hours for about 5 days in the last weeks of pregnancy. No maternal benefit from the therapy was observed. There was apparently no fetal harm, but the neonatal outcomes were not described.

There are substantial – more than 900 – human pregnancy exposures in the first trimester with phenazopyridine. The exposures were not related to an increased risk of embryo-fetal harm and so use of the drug in pregnancy can be classified as compatible. However, the low molecular weight (about 214 for the free base) suggests that the drug will cross to the embryo and fetus.
 

Antispasmodics

The eight antispasmodics are darifenacin (Enablex), fesoterodine (Toviaz), flavoxate, mirabegron (Myrbetriq), oxybutynin (Ditropan XL), solifenacin (Vesicare), tolterodine (Detrol LA), and trospium.

These agents are indicated for the treatment of overactive bladder with symptoms of urge urinary incontinence, urgency, and frequency. The molecular weights range between 342 and 508, suggesting that all will cross the human placenta. There are no human pregnancy data for six of these agents and very limited data for flavoxate and oxybutynin. There is no evidence of embryo-fetal harm from these two drugs, but only one case involved exposure in the first trimester.

In seven of these drugs, the animal data suggested low risk. There was no embryo harm from doses that were equal to or less than 10 times the human dose based on body surface area (BSA) or area under the concentration curve (AUC). Solifenacin did cause embryo toxicity in pregnant mice. There was no embryo toxicity in pregnant rats and rabbits, but the maximum doses used were very low. Overall, the available data suggest that exposure to an antispasmodic in pregnancy is low risk for embryo, fetal, and newborn harm.
 

Urinary acidifiers

Ammonium chloride is a urinary acidifier as well as a respiratory expectorant. There is a large amount of data related to when the drug was used as an expectorant. There was no evidence that this use was associated with large categories of major or minor malformations. However, there were possible associations with three individual defects: inguinal hernia, cataract, and any benign tumor. No reports describing its use as a urinary acidifier have been located. When large amounts are consumed near term, the drug may cause acidosis in the mother and fetus. The molecular weight (about 53) suggests that it will cross the placenta.

Urinary alkalinizers

Potassium citrate (Urocit-K) is indicated for the management of renal tubular acidosis with calcium stones, hypocitraturic calcium oxalate with nephrolithiasis of any etiology, and uric acid lithiasis with or without calcium stones. The molecular weight (about 307) suggests it will cross the placenta. Only one case of its use in pregnancy has been located. The newborn had an unspecified defect but no other information was provided. The animal data in four species suggest low risk.

Urinary germicides

There are three urinary germicides: methenamine, methylene blue, and nitrofurantoin. Methenamine is available as methenamine mandelate (molecular weight abut 292) and methenamine hippurate (molecular weight about 319). Both are metabolized to formaldehyde (molecular weight about 30), the active agent. The molecular weights suggest that all will cross the placenta. The use of methenamine during pregnancy has been reported in more than 750 pregnancies. There have been no embryo or fetal adverse effects attributed to the drug.

The human data involving oral methylene blue, a weak urinary germicide, is limited to 55 exposures. There were three infants with birth defects (type not specified). Several reports have described the use of intra-amniotic injections to assist in the diagnosis of suspected membrane rupture. This use has resulted in newborns with hemolytic anemia, hyperbilirubinemia with or without Heinz body formation, blue staining of the skin, and methemoglobinemia. Fetal deaths have also been described. Recommendations to avoid the intra-amniotic use of methylene blue were issued more than 10 years ago. Moreover, the use of oral methylene blue as a urinary germicide is no longer recommended.

The low molecular weight (about 238) of nitrofurantoin suggests that it will cross the placenta. It is commonly used in pregnancy for the treatment or prophylaxis of urinary tract infections. The large amount of human data indicates that the risk of drug-induced birth defects is low. Several cohort studies have found no increased risk for birth defects. However, some case-control studies have found increased risks for hypoplastic left heart syndrome and oral clefts. A 2015 review concluded that this difference was due to the increased sensitivity of case-control studies to detect adverse effects (J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Feb;37[2]:150-6).

Use of the drug close to term may cause hemolytic anemia in newborns who are glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficient. Although rare, this may also occur in newborns who are not G6PD deficient. The best course is to avoid use of the drug close to delivery. As for use of the drug in the first trimester, ACOG’s Committee on Obstetric Practice stated in Committee Opinion No. 717 that nitrofurantoin was still thought to be appropriate when no other suitable alternative antibiotics were available (Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sept;130[3]:666-7).
 

Breastfeeding

Except for methenamine and nitrofurantoin, there are no data related to the use of the urinary tract drugs during breastfeeding. Peak levels of methenamine occur at 1 hour, but no reports of adverse effects on nursing infants have been located. Several reports have described the use of nitrofurantoin during breastfeeding. Minor diarrhea was noted in two infants. However, breastfeeding an infant with G6PD deficiency could lead to hemolytic anemia.

Phenazopyridine should be used with caution especially for an infant younger than 1 month or with G6PD deficiency because of the risk for methemoglobinemia, sulfhemoglobinemia, and hemolytic anemia.

Although there have been no reports of the use of mirabegron during lactation, the characteristics of the drug – low molecular weight (about 397), long elimination half life (50 hours), and moderate plasma protein binding (about 71%) – suggest that the drug will be excreted into milk, potentially in clinically significant amounts. There is also concern with use of tolterodine (molecular weight about 476) because both the primary drug and its equipotent metabolite may be excreted into milk.
 

Mr. Briggs is a clinical professor of pharmacy at the University of California, San Francisco, and an adjunct professor of pharmacy at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, as well as at Washington State University, Spokane. He coauthored “Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation” and coedited “Diseases, Complications, and Drug Therapy in Obstetrics.” He reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

SAN ANTONIO – Fully one-third of patients with heavily pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) had a response to therapy with a novel antibody-drug conjugate called sacituzumab govitecan. The conjugate consists of the active metabolites of the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan linked to a humanized monoclonal antibody target Trop-2, a cell-surface glycoprotein expressed in triple-negative breast cancers and most other epithelial malignancies.

Aditya Bardia, MD, from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, previously reported results of a phase 1/2 basket trial that resulted in sacituzumab govitecan receiving a breakthrough designation from the Food and Drug Administration.

In this video interview, he discusses the conjugate’s activity in the third-line or greater setting for patients with metastatic TNBC, with an overall response rate of 34%, including some complete responses according to independent reviewers, and describes planned clinical trials pitting the agent against standard-of-care single-drug therapies.

The trial was supported by Immunomedics. Dr. Bardia reported institutional funding from the company, but no other conflicts of interest.

SAN ANTONIO – Fully one-third of patients with heavily pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) had a response to therapy with a novel antibody-drug conjugate called sacituzumab govitecan. The conjugate consists of the active metabolites of the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan linked to a humanized monoclonal antibody target Trop-2, a cell-surface glycoprotein expressed in triple-negative breast cancers and most other epithelial malignancies.

Aditya Bardia, MD, from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, previously reported results of a phase 1/2 basket trial that resulted in sacituzumab govitecan receiving a breakthrough designation from the Food and Drug Administration.

In this video interview, he discusses the conjugate’s activity in the third-line or greater setting for patients with metastatic TNBC, with an overall response rate of 34%, including some complete responses according to independent reviewers, and describes planned clinical trials pitting the agent against standard-of-care single-drug therapies.

The trial was supported by Immunomedics. Dr. Bardia reported institutional funding from the company, but no other conflicts of interest.

SAN ANTONIO – Fully one-third of patients with heavily pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) had a response to therapy with a novel antibody-drug conjugate called sacituzumab govitecan. The conjugate consists of the active metabolites of the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan linked to a humanized monoclonal antibody target Trop-2, a cell-surface glycoprotein expressed in triple-negative breast cancers and most other epithelial malignancies.

Aditya Bardia, MD, from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, previously reported results of a phase 1/2 basket trial that resulted in sacituzumab govitecan receiving a breakthrough designation from the Food and Drug Administration.

In this video interview, he discusses the conjugate’s activity in the third-line or greater setting for patients with metastatic TNBC, with an overall response rate of 34%, including some complete responses according to independent reviewers, and describes planned clinical trials pitting the agent against standard-of-care single-drug therapies.

The trial was supported by Immunomedics. Dr. Bardia reported institutional funding from the company, but no other conflicts of interest.