How to best evaluate children’s melanocytic lesions for melanoma

Article Type
Changed

 

Children often present for evaluation of a melanocytic lesion that is new, evolving, or worrisome to parents and caregivers.

 

 

Dr. Sheila Fallon Friedlander
Childhood and adolescent melanoma is rare, but the incidence in the United States has been steadily increasing over the past 35 years. A multicenter, retrospective review conducted by Wong et al., using the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1973 and 2009, detected 1,317 cases of melanoma for an incidence rate of 6 (95% confidence interval, 5.7-6.3), and revealed an average increase in adolescent melanoma of 2% per year. The greatest incidence occurred in girls aged 15-19 years, and individuals living in geographic locations with low ultraviolet-B exposure, intermittently exposed to intense UV rays (Pediatrics. 2013 May;131[5]:846-54).

Only 104 cases were diagnosed in children aged less than 10 years, and the melanoma incidence in this age group was relatively unchanging from 1973 to 2009. Dr. Friedlander further emphasized, “Pediatric melanoma is extremely uncommon in patients less than 10 years of age, but more likely to be atypical.”

She continued by describing a group of surgical oncologists at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, who conducted a retrospective review of children with cutaneous melanoma between 1988 and 2007 included in the SEER database, to determine the influence of age on disease presentation. Preadolescents younger than age 10 years were more ethnically diverse (nonwhite), more frequently presented with nontruncal primary melanocytic lesions, and increasingly were diagnosed with advanced disease, compared with their adolescent counterparts (J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Nov;48[11]:2207-13).

The National Cancer Institute
Cordoro et al. conducted a similar large retrospective cohort study of children given the diagnosis of melanoma from 1984 to 2009 at the University of California, San Francisco (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Jun;68[6] 913-25). Discovering that 60% of 70 children did not present with classic ABCDE findings (asymmetry, border, color, diameter, evolving), this group suggested additional ABCD detection criteria (amelanosis, bleeding, bumps, color uniformity, variable diameter, and de novo development) to facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment of pediatric melanoma.

Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) may have increased risk for malignant potential, and can be challenging for pediatric providers to manage. Among all CMN, the increase in melanoma risk is estimated as less than 1%. The risk for malignant melanoma is further increased in individuals with large or giant CMN (greater than 20 cm diameter adult size), with an absolute risk of approximately 2%-5%. The number of satellite nevi also is considered in risk stratification. The presence of greater than 20 satellite nevi is associated with a greater than fivefold risk of neurocutaneous melanosis. There is no documented association between an increased quantity of satellite nevi and malignant melanoma.

“One particularly challenging pigmented lesion identified among pediatric patients is a Spitz nevus,” according to Dr. Friedlander. This lesion presents with greater cytologic atypia than other benign congenital and acquired nevi, and often clinically mimics malignant melanoma if identified in adults. There also exists a subset of atypical Spitz nevi, consisting of lesions with greater cytologic atypia than benign Spitz nevi. A retrospective review at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, of 157 cases of Spitz-type melanocytic lesions identified between 1987 and 2002 revealed increased melanoma risk, minimal mortality, and moderate risk of regional lymph node metastasis (Arch Dermatol. 2011;147[10]:1173-9).

“Classic pediatric Spitz nevi with typical clinical features and history may be managed conservatively with clinical monitoring alone, but those with concerning features such as bleeding, asymmetry, or ulceration should be excised with clear margins,” Dr. Friedlander emphasized. She discouraged sentinel lymph node biopsy, however, given the positive outcomes of 24 patients at Boston Children’s Hospital with atypical Spitz nevi treated with excision alone, published by Cerrato et al. (Pediatr Dermatol. 2011 Dec 30;29[4]:448-53).

“In light of the rising incidence of pediatric melanoma, we need to identify high-risk patients, educate about mole surveillance, and encourage sun protection,” Dr. Friedlander stressed. Children with phenotype of Fitzpatrick I (fair skin, blonde or red hair, and blue eye color) are at highest risk, as are those with a high density of freckles who burn easily and tan poorly. Further risk factors highlighted include excessive sun exposure, indoor tanning, use of phototoxic medications, immunosuppression, and genetics. The first and best line of defense against harmful ultraviolet radiation is covering up (clothing with a tight weave, wet suits, and hats).

The American Academy of Pediatrics encourages staying in the shade when possible, and limiting sun exposure during the peak sun intensity hours, between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. When physical protection is not possible, the American Academy of Dermatology endorses the application of water resistant, broad spectrum SPF of greater than 30 at least every 2 hours.
Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

Children often present for evaluation of a melanocytic lesion that is new, evolving, or worrisome to parents and caregivers.

 

 

Dr. Sheila Fallon Friedlander
Childhood and adolescent melanoma is rare, but the incidence in the United States has been steadily increasing over the past 35 years. A multicenter, retrospective review conducted by Wong et al., using the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1973 and 2009, detected 1,317 cases of melanoma for an incidence rate of 6 (95% confidence interval, 5.7-6.3), and revealed an average increase in adolescent melanoma of 2% per year. The greatest incidence occurred in girls aged 15-19 years, and individuals living in geographic locations with low ultraviolet-B exposure, intermittently exposed to intense UV rays (Pediatrics. 2013 May;131[5]:846-54).

Only 104 cases were diagnosed in children aged less than 10 years, and the melanoma incidence in this age group was relatively unchanging from 1973 to 2009. Dr. Friedlander further emphasized, “Pediatric melanoma is extremely uncommon in patients less than 10 years of age, but more likely to be atypical.”

She continued by describing a group of surgical oncologists at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, who conducted a retrospective review of children with cutaneous melanoma between 1988 and 2007 included in the SEER database, to determine the influence of age on disease presentation. Preadolescents younger than age 10 years were more ethnically diverse (nonwhite), more frequently presented with nontruncal primary melanocytic lesions, and increasingly were diagnosed with advanced disease, compared with their adolescent counterparts (J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Nov;48[11]:2207-13).

The National Cancer Institute
Cordoro et al. conducted a similar large retrospective cohort study of children given the diagnosis of melanoma from 1984 to 2009 at the University of California, San Francisco (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Jun;68[6] 913-25). Discovering that 60% of 70 children did not present with classic ABCDE findings (asymmetry, border, color, diameter, evolving), this group suggested additional ABCD detection criteria (amelanosis, bleeding, bumps, color uniformity, variable diameter, and de novo development) to facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment of pediatric melanoma.

Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) may have increased risk for malignant potential, and can be challenging for pediatric providers to manage. Among all CMN, the increase in melanoma risk is estimated as less than 1%. The risk for malignant melanoma is further increased in individuals with large or giant CMN (greater than 20 cm diameter adult size), with an absolute risk of approximately 2%-5%. The number of satellite nevi also is considered in risk stratification. The presence of greater than 20 satellite nevi is associated with a greater than fivefold risk of neurocutaneous melanosis. There is no documented association between an increased quantity of satellite nevi and malignant melanoma.

“One particularly challenging pigmented lesion identified among pediatric patients is a Spitz nevus,” according to Dr. Friedlander. This lesion presents with greater cytologic atypia than other benign congenital and acquired nevi, and often clinically mimics malignant melanoma if identified in adults. There also exists a subset of atypical Spitz nevi, consisting of lesions with greater cytologic atypia than benign Spitz nevi. A retrospective review at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, of 157 cases of Spitz-type melanocytic lesions identified between 1987 and 2002 revealed increased melanoma risk, minimal mortality, and moderate risk of regional lymph node metastasis (Arch Dermatol. 2011;147[10]:1173-9).

“Classic pediatric Spitz nevi with typical clinical features and history may be managed conservatively with clinical monitoring alone, but those with concerning features such as bleeding, asymmetry, or ulceration should be excised with clear margins,” Dr. Friedlander emphasized. She discouraged sentinel lymph node biopsy, however, given the positive outcomes of 24 patients at Boston Children’s Hospital with atypical Spitz nevi treated with excision alone, published by Cerrato et al. (Pediatr Dermatol. 2011 Dec 30;29[4]:448-53).

“In light of the rising incidence of pediatric melanoma, we need to identify high-risk patients, educate about mole surveillance, and encourage sun protection,” Dr. Friedlander stressed. Children with phenotype of Fitzpatrick I (fair skin, blonde or red hair, and blue eye color) are at highest risk, as are those with a high density of freckles who burn easily and tan poorly. Further risk factors highlighted include excessive sun exposure, indoor tanning, use of phototoxic medications, immunosuppression, and genetics. The first and best line of defense against harmful ultraviolet radiation is covering up (clothing with a tight weave, wet suits, and hats).

The American Academy of Pediatrics encourages staying in the shade when possible, and limiting sun exposure during the peak sun intensity hours, between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. When physical protection is not possible, the American Academy of Dermatology endorses the application of water resistant, broad spectrum SPF of greater than 30 at least every 2 hours.

 

Children often present for evaluation of a melanocytic lesion that is new, evolving, or worrisome to parents and caregivers.

 

 

Dr. Sheila Fallon Friedlander
Childhood and adolescent melanoma is rare, but the incidence in the United States has been steadily increasing over the past 35 years. A multicenter, retrospective review conducted by Wong et al., using the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1973 and 2009, detected 1,317 cases of melanoma for an incidence rate of 6 (95% confidence interval, 5.7-6.3), and revealed an average increase in adolescent melanoma of 2% per year. The greatest incidence occurred in girls aged 15-19 years, and individuals living in geographic locations with low ultraviolet-B exposure, intermittently exposed to intense UV rays (Pediatrics. 2013 May;131[5]:846-54).

Only 104 cases were diagnosed in children aged less than 10 years, and the melanoma incidence in this age group was relatively unchanging from 1973 to 2009. Dr. Friedlander further emphasized, “Pediatric melanoma is extremely uncommon in patients less than 10 years of age, but more likely to be atypical.”

She continued by describing a group of surgical oncologists at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, who conducted a retrospective review of children with cutaneous melanoma between 1988 and 2007 included in the SEER database, to determine the influence of age on disease presentation. Preadolescents younger than age 10 years were more ethnically diverse (nonwhite), more frequently presented with nontruncal primary melanocytic lesions, and increasingly were diagnosed with advanced disease, compared with their adolescent counterparts (J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Nov;48[11]:2207-13).

The National Cancer Institute
Cordoro et al. conducted a similar large retrospective cohort study of children given the diagnosis of melanoma from 1984 to 2009 at the University of California, San Francisco (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Jun;68[6] 913-25). Discovering that 60% of 70 children did not present with classic ABCDE findings (asymmetry, border, color, diameter, evolving), this group suggested additional ABCD detection criteria (amelanosis, bleeding, bumps, color uniformity, variable diameter, and de novo development) to facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment of pediatric melanoma.

Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) may have increased risk for malignant potential, and can be challenging for pediatric providers to manage. Among all CMN, the increase in melanoma risk is estimated as less than 1%. The risk for malignant melanoma is further increased in individuals with large or giant CMN (greater than 20 cm diameter adult size), with an absolute risk of approximately 2%-5%. The number of satellite nevi also is considered in risk stratification. The presence of greater than 20 satellite nevi is associated with a greater than fivefold risk of neurocutaneous melanosis. There is no documented association between an increased quantity of satellite nevi and malignant melanoma.

“One particularly challenging pigmented lesion identified among pediatric patients is a Spitz nevus,” according to Dr. Friedlander. This lesion presents with greater cytologic atypia than other benign congenital and acquired nevi, and often clinically mimics malignant melanoma if identified in adults. There also exists a subset of atypical Spitz nevi, consisting of lesions with greater cytologic atypia than benign Spitz nevi. A retrospective review at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, of 157 cases of Spitz-type melanocytic lesions identified between 1987 and 2002 revealed increased melanoma risk, minimal mortality, and moderate risk of regional lymph node metastasis (Arch Dermatol. 2011;147[10]:1173-9).

“Classic pediatric Spitz nevi with typical clinical features and history may be managed conservatively with clinical monitoring alone, but those with concerning features such as bleeding, asymmetry, or ulceration should be excised with clear margins,” Dr. Friedlander emphasized. She discouraged sentinel lymph node biopsy, however, given the positive outcomes of 24 patients at Boston Children’s Hospital with atypical Spitz nevi treated with excision alone, published by Cerrato et al. (Pediatr Dermatol. 2011 Dec 30;29[4]:448-53).

“In light of the rising incidence of pediatric melanoma, we need to identify high-risk patients, educate about mole surveillance, and encourage sun protection,” Dr. Friedlander stressed. Children with phenotype of Fitzpatrick I (fair skin, blonde or red hair, and blue eye color) are at highest risk, as are those with a high density of freckles who burn easily and tan poorly. Further risk factors highlighted include excessive sun exposure, indoor tanning, use of phototoxic medications, immunosuppression, and genetics. The first and best line of defense against harmful ultraviolet radiation is covering up (clothing with a tight weave, wet suits, and hats).

The American Academy of Pediatrics encourages staying in the shade when possible, and limiting sun exposure during the peak sun intensity hours, between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. When physical protection is not possible, the American Academy of Dermatology endorses the application of water resistant, broad spectrum SPF of greater than 30 at least every 2 hours.
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Direct microscopy plus nail clipping identifies onychomycosis

Article Type
Changed

 

In the absence of a typical presentation, combining direct microscopy plus nail clipping histopathology – two diagnostic tests with different sensitivities and specificities – raises the likelihood of correctly diagnosing onychomycosis, according to a report published in Mycoses.

copyright Manuel-F-O/Thinkstock
The investigators assessed the performance of cultures and two inexpensive and readily available techniques, direct microscopy and nail clipping for histopathological examination, at identifying toenail onychomycoses caused by dermatophyte and nondermatophyte molds. Their study sample comprised 212 adults who presented for diagnosis and treatment of toenail lesions to a single center during a 2-year period. Each patient had at least one lesion 2 mm wide and 3-5 mm long on the affected toenail.

The mean patient age was 58.8 years (range, 27-86 years). Most study participants (77.8%) had more than 1 affected nail. Many (29.7%) also had symptoms or signs of cutaneous lesions on the palm, sole, or interdigital region.

Direct microscopy was the most sensitive diagnostic test, correctly identifying 100% of the 122 cases of onychomycosis. In contrast, cultures identified only 34.4% of cases. This low sensitivity for culture testing was expected, and was “likely due to the rapid growth of fungi and bacteria comprising the local microbiota, which often prevents the growth of pathogenic fungi, particularly of slow-growing dermatophytes,” Dr. Lavorato and her associates said (Mycoses. 2017 May 15. doi:10.1111/myc.12633).

Histopathology of nail clippings was the most specific diagnostic test, correctly identifying 77% of cases. “Nail clipping histopathologic analysis complements the [microscopic] examination, particularly in cases of strong clinical suspicion but repeatedly negative mycological tests,” the investigators noted.

Direct microscopy showed greater accuracy with nondermatophytes, while nail clipping showed greater accuracy for dermatophytes, they added.

In this study, Trichophyton rubrum and T. mentagrophytes were the most frequently isolated dermatophytes, found in 70% and 23% of cases, respectively. Neoscytalidium dimidatum and Fusarium species were the most frequently isolated nondermatophytes, found in 44% and 28% of cases, respectively. In addition, Candida yeasts were isolated in samples from 14% of patients, and bacterial colonies were isolated in 70%.

The Mycology Laboratory at Pedro Ernesto University Hospital supported the study. Dr. Lavorato and her associates reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

In the absence of a typical presentation, combining direct microscopy plus nail clipping histopathology – two diagnostic tests with different sensitivities and specificities – raises the likelihood of correctly diagnosing onychomycosis, according to a report published in Mycoses.

copyright Manuel-F-O/Thinkstock
The investigators assessed the performance of cultures and two inexpensive and readily available techniques, direct microscopy and nail clipping for histopathological examination, at identifying toenail onychomycoses caused by dermatophyte and nondermatophyte molds. Their study sample comprised 212 adults who presented for diagnosis and treatment of toenail lesions to a single center during a 2-year period. Each patient had at least one lesion 2 mm wide and 3-5 mm long on the affected toenail.

The mean patient age was 58.8 years (range, 27-86 years). Most study participants (77.8%) had more than 1 affected nail. Many (29.7%) also had symptoms or signs of cutaneous lesions on the palm, sole, or interdigital region.

Direct microscopy was the most sensitive diagnostic test, correctly identifying 100% of the 122 cases of onychomycosis. In contrast, cultures identified only 34.4% of cases. This low sensitivity for culture testing was expected, and was “likely due to the rapid growth of fungi and bacteria comprising the local microbiota, which often prevents the growth of pathogenic fungi, particularly of slow-growing dermatophytes,” Dr. Lavorato and her associates said (Mycoses. 2017 May 15. doi:10.1111/myc.12633).

Histopathology of nail clippings was the most specific diagnostic test, correctly identifying 77% of cases. “Nail clipping histopathologic analysis complements the [microscopic] examination, particularly in cases of strong clinical suspicion but repeatedly negative mycological tests,” the investigators noted.

Direct microscopy showed greater accuracy with nondermatophytes, while nail clipping showed greater accuracy for dermatophytes, they added.

In this study, Trichophyton rubrum and T. mentagrophytes were the most frequently isolated dermatophytes, found in 70% and 23% of cases, respectively. Neoscytalidium dimidatum and Fusarium species were the most frequently isolated nondermatophytes, found in 44% and 28% of cases, respectively. In addition, Candida yeasts were isolated in samples from 14% of patients, and bacterial colonies were isolated in 70%.

The Mycology Laboratory at Pedro Ernesto University Hospital supported the study. Dr. Lavorato and her associates reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

 

In the absence of a typical presentation, combining direct microscopy plus nail clipping histopathology – two diagnostic tests with different sensitivities and specificities – raises the likelihood of correctly diagnosing onychomycosis, according to a report published in Mycoses.

copyright Manuel-F-O/Thinkstock
The investigators assessed the performance of cultures and two inexpensive and readily available techniques, direct microscopy and nail clipping for histopathological examination, at identifying toenail onychomycoses caused by dermatophyte and nondermatophyte molds. Their study sample comprised 212 adults who presented for diagnosis and treatment of toenail lesions to a single center during a 2-year period. Each patient had at least one lesion 2 mm wide and 3-5 mm long on the affected toenail.

The mean patient age was 58.8 years (range, 27-86 years). Most study participants (77.8%) had more than 1 affected nail. Many (29.7%) also had symptoms or signs of cutaneous lesions on the palm, sole, or interdigital region.

Direct microscopy was the most sensitive diagnostic test, correctly identifying 100% of the 122 cases of onychomycosis. In contrast, cultures identified only 34.4% of cases. This low sensitivity for culture testing was expected, and was “likely due to the rapid growth of fungi and bacteria comprising the local microbiota, which often prevents the growth of pathogenic fungi, particularly of slow-growing dermatophytes,” Dr. Lavorato and her associates said (Mycoses. 2017 May 15. doi:10.1111/myc.12633).

Histopathology of nail clippings was the most specific diagnostic test, correctly identifying 77% of cases. “Nail clipping histopathologic analysis complements the [microscopic] examination, particularly in cases of strong clinical suspicion but repeatedly negative mycological tests,” the investigators noted.

Direct microscopy showed greater accuracy with nondermatophytes, while nail clipping showed greater accuracy for dermatophytes, they added.

In this study, Trichophyton rubrum and T. mentagrophytes were the most frequently isolated dermatophytes, found in 70% and 23% of cases, respectively. Neoscytalidium dimidatum and Fusarium species were the most frequently isolated nondermatophytes, found in 44% and 28% of cases, respectively. In addition, Candida yeasts were isolated in samples from 14% of patients, and bacterial colonies were isolated in 70%.

The Mycology Laboratory at Pedro Ernesto University Hospital supported the study. Dr. Lavorato and her associates reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM MYCOSES

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: In the absence of a typical clinical presentation, combining direct microscopy plus nail clipping histopathology – two diagnostic tests with different sensitivities and specificities – raises the likelihood of correctly diagnosing onychomycosis.

Major finding: Direct microscopy was the most sensitive diagnostic test, correctly identifying 100% of the 122 cases of onychomycosis, while histopathology of nail clippings was the most specific diagnostic test, correctly identifying 77% of cases.

Data source: A single-center prospective cross-sectional study involving 212 adults suspected of having onychomycosis during a 2-year period.

Disclosures: The Mycology Laboratory at Pedro Ernesto University Hospital supported the study. Dr. Lavorato and her associates reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

David Henry's JCSO podcast, May-June 2017

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
David Henry's JCSO podcast, May-June 2017

For the May-June issue of the Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology, the Editor in Chief, Dr David Henry, discusses an editorial by Kevin Knopf, a JCSO editor, about drawing on modern portfolio theory to improve cancer care. Side effects come under scrutiny this issue, with a How We Do It article on prehabilitation for lymphedema in head and neck cancer patients, a Review article that examines pancreatitis associated with newer classes of antineoplastic therapies, and a research article that looks at prescriber adherence to antiemetic guidelines with trifluridine-tipiracil. In other research articles, investigators report on physician attitudes and prevalence of molecular testing in lung cancer; a comprehensive assessment of cancer survivors’ concerns to inform program development; and perceived financial hardship among patients with advanced cancer. Two Case Reports address the treatment of Kaposi sarcoma in patients with AIDS, and a third describes a rare case of hypoglycemia induced by a classic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Finally, Dr Henry summarizes an in-depth interview on cardiotoxicity, which he did with his colleague, Dr Joseph Carver.

 

Listen to the podcast below.

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

For the May-June issue of the Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology, the Editor in Chief, Dr David Henry, discusses an editorial by Kevin Knopf, a JCSO editor, about drawing on modern portfolio theory to improve cancer care. Side effects come under scrutiny this issue, with a How We Do It article on prehabilitation for lymphedema in head and neck cancer patients, a Review article that examines pancreatitis associated with newer classes of antineoplastic therapies, and a research article that looks at prescriber adherence to antiemetic guidelines with trifluridine-tipiracil. In other research articles, investigators report on physician attitudes and prevalence of molecular testing in lung cancer; a comprehensive assessment of cancer survivors’ concerns to inform program development; and perceived financial hardship among patients with advanced cancer. Two Case Reports address the treatment of Kaposi sarcoma in patients with AIDS, and a third describes a rare case of hypoglycemia induced by a classic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Finally, Dr Henry summarizes an in-depth interview on cardiotoxicity, which he did with his colleague, Dr Joseph Carver.

 

Listen to the podcast below.

 

For the May-June issue of the Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology, the Editor in Chief, Dr David Henry, discusses an editorial by Kevin Knopf, a JCSO editor, about drawing on modern portfolio theory to improve cancer care. Side effects come under scrutiny this issue, with a How We Do It article on prehabilitation for lymphedema in head and neck cancer patients, a Review article that examines pancreatitis associated with newer classes of antineoplastic therapies, and a research article that looks at prescriber adherence to antiemetic guidelines with trifluridine-tipiracil. In other research articles, investigators report on physician attitudes and prevalence of molecular testing in lung cancer; a comprehensive assessment of cancer survivors’ concerns to inform program development; and perceived financial hardship among patients with advanced cancer. Two Case Reports address the treatment of Kaposi sarcoma in patients with AIDS, and a third describes a rare case of hypoglycemia induced by a classic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Finally, Dr Henry summarizes an in-depth interview on cardiotoxicity, which he did with his colleague, Dr Joseph Carver.

 

Listen to the podcast below.

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
David Henry's JCSO podcast, May-June 2017
Display Headline
David Henry's JCSO podcast, May-June 2017
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Risk tolerance to MS therapies varies widely

Article Type
Changed

 

NEW ORLEANS – Risk tolerance to current disease modifying therapies by patients with multiple sclerosis varies widely, results from a large national survey demonstrated.

“We have therapies available with a wide range of risks,” study author Sneha Natarajan, PhD, said in an interview at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. “Some of the risks are relatively minor like injection site reactions or flu-like symptoms and some are as bad as PML [progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy], which can be fatal. We don’t know what kind of risks people tolerate.”

Doug Brunk/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Sneha Natarajan
To find out, she and her associates conducted a survey of participants of North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis and visitors to the National Multiple Sclerosis Society website who reported having MS. The benefit of a hypothetical oral disease modifying therapy (DMT) was set at 50% reduction in clinical relapses and 30% reduction in disability progression. The researchers chose six different risk scenarios to evaluate tolerance to six risks: risk of infection, skin rash, kidney injury, thyroid injury, liver injury, and risk of PML. Starting from a risk tolerance of 1:1,000, the risk was adjusted to identify the highest risk tolerated, ranging from “would take regardless of the risk of death” to “no acceptable risk.”

Dr. Natarajan, research coordinator at the Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis at the Cleveland Clinic, reported results from 3,371 survey respondents. Their mean age was 55 years, 93% were white, 61% had the relapsing-remitting form of MS, and 53% were currently taking a DMT. Overall, respondents reported the highest risk tolerance for infection or thyroid risks (1:1,000 for both) and lowest risk tolerance for PML and kidney injury risks (1:1,000,000 for both). Males reported a higher risk tolerance to all six risks (P less than .0001 for all). Females reported a risk tolerance to skin rash that was similar to kidney injury and PML.

“There is a pattern to the risks that our patients accept,” Dr. Natarajan said. “I don’t think a doctor would not recommend a therapy benefit because of a skin rash [risk], but he may need to address the concerns of the patient upfront and have a talk with the patient.”

The researchers also found that current DMT users expressed increased risk tolerance for all outcomes, compared with those not using any DMT (P less than .001). Higher risk tolerance was also expressed by respondents who were older, more disabled, and by those taking infusion therapies.

The National Multiple Sclerosis Society funded the study. Dr. Natarajan reported having no financial disclosures.
 
Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Related Articles

 

NEW ORLEANS – Risk tolerance to current disease modifying therapies by patients with multiple sclerosis varies widely, results from a large national survey demonstrated.

“We have therapies available with a wide range of risks,” study author Sneha Natarajan, PhD, said in an interview at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. “Some of the risks are relatively minor like injection site reactions or flu-like symptoms and some are as bad as PML [progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy], which can be fatal. We don’t know what kind of risks people tolerate.”

Doug Brunk/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Sneha Natarajan
To find out, she and her associates conducted a survey of participants of North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis and visitors to the National Multiple Sclerosis Society website who reported having MS. The benefit of a hypothetical oral disease modifying therapy (DMT) was set at 50% reduction in clinical relapses and 30% reduction in disability progression. The researchers chose six different risk scenarios to evaluate tolerance to six risks: risk of infection, skin rash, kidney injury, thyroid injury, liver injury, and risk of PML. Starting from a risk tolerance of 1:1,000, the risk was adjusted to identify the highest risk tolerated, ranging from “would take regardless of the risk of death” to “no acceptable risk.”

Dr. Natarajan, research coordinator at the Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis at the Cleveland Clinic, reported results from 3,371 survey respondents. Their mean age was 55 years, 93% were white, 61% had the relapsing-remitting form of MS, and 53% were currently taking a DMT. Overall, respondents reported the highest risk tolerance for infection or thyroid risks (1:1,000 for both) and lowest risk tolerance for PML and kidney injury risks (1:1,000,000 for both). Males reported a higher risk tolerance to all six risks (P less than .0001 for all). Females reported a risk tolerance to skin rash that was similar to kidney injury and PML.

“There is a pattern to the risks that our patients accept,” Dr. Natarajan said. “I don’t think a doctor would not recommend a therapy benefit because of a skin rash [risk], but he may need to address the concerns of the patient upfront and have a talk with the patient.”

The researchers also found that current DMT users expressed increased risk tolerance for all outcomes, compared with those not using any DMT (P less than .001). Higher risk tolerance was also expressed by respondents who were older, more disabled, and by those taking infusion therapies.

The National Multiple Sclerosis Society funded the study. Dr. Natarajan reported having no financial disclosures.
 

 

NEW ORLEANS – Risk tolerance to current disease modifying therapies by patients with multiple sclerosis varies widely, results from a large national survey demonstrated.

“We have therapies available with a wide range of risks,” study author Sneha Natarajan, PhD, said in an interview at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. “Some of the risks are relatively minor like injection site reactions or flu-like symptoms and some are as bad as PML [progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy], which can be fatal. We don’t know what kind of risks people tolerate.”

Doug Brunk/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Sneha Natarajan
To find out, she and her associates conducted a survey of participants of North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis and visitors to the National Multiple Sclerosis Society website who reported having MS. The benefit of a hypothetical oral disease modifying therapy (DMT) was set at 50% reduction in clinical relapses and 30% reduction in disability progression. The researchers chose six different risk scenarios to evaluate tolerance to six risks: risk of infection, skin rash, kidney injury, thyroid injury, liver injury, and risk of PML. Starting from a risk tolerance of 1:1,000, the risk was adjusted to identify the highest risk tolerated, ranging from “would take regardless of the risk of death” to “no acceptable risk.”

Dr. Natarajan, research coordinator at the Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis at the Cleveland Clinic, reported results from 3,371 survey respondents. Their mean age was 55 years, 93% were white, 61% had the relapsing-remitting form of MS, and 53% were currently taking a DMT. Overall, respondents reported the highest risk tolerance for infection or thyroid risks (1:1,000 for both) and lowest risk tolerance for PML and kidney injury risks (1:1,000,000 for both). Males reported a higher risk tolerance to all six risks (P less than .0001 for all). Females reported a risk tolerance to skin rash that was similar to kidney injury and PML.

“There is a pattern to the risks that our patients accept,” Dr. Natarajan said. “I don’t think a doctor would not recommend a therapy benefit because of a skin rash [risk], but he may need to address the concerns of the patient upfront and have a talk with the patient.”

The researchers also found that current DMT users expressed increased risk tolerance for all outcomes, compared with those not using any DMT (P less than .001). Higher risk tolerance was also expressed by respondents who were older, more disabled, and by those taking infusion therapies.

The National Multiple Sclerosis Society funded the study. Dr. Natarajan reported having no financial disclosures.
 
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Active
Sections
Article Source

AT THE CMSC ANNUAL MEETING

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
CME ID
139524
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: People with MS report different levels of tolerance to various risks associated with DMTs.

Major finding: Survey respondents reported the highest risk tolerance for infection or thyroid risks (1:1,000 for both) and lowest risk tolerance for PML and kidney injury risks (1:1,000,000 for both).

Data source: A survey of 3,371 people who reported having MS.

Disclosures: The National Multiple Sclerosis Society funded the study. Dr. Natarajan reported having no financial disclosures.

Family reports provide additional information regarding adverse events

Article Type
Changed

 

Clinical Question: Do family reports of adverse events improve incident detection, compared with clinician reports and hospital incident reports?

Background: Hospital incident reports, which are voluntary and suffer from underreporting, capture only a fraction of errors and adverse events (defined as errors resulting in harm). Systematic, prospective surveillance by researchers is the gold standard but is time consuming and expensive. The authors hypothesized that family reports would improve error and adverse event detection.

Study Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Four U.S. pediatric hospitals.

Synopsis: The authors developed a Family Safety Interview, administered weekly and on discharge, and compared reporting of errors and adverse events to clinician reports, hospital incident reports, and systematic review of records by researchers. Of 989 hospitalized pediatric patients, 746 parents/caregivers completed interviews between December 2014 and July 2015. From all sources, the authors found a total of 179 errors and 113 adverse events. Families reported a total of 39 of these 179 errors (including 19 unique errors not reported elsewhere) and 33 of 113 adverse events (8 unique).

Overall, error rates with family-reported errors were 15.5% higher (95% confidence interval, 9.0%-22.3%) than without. Adverse event rates with family reporting were 9.8% higher (95% CI, 3.1%-16.9%) than without. Family-reported error rates were 5 times higher (95% CI, 1.9-13.0) than hospital incident report rates.

The study showed that family-reported error and adverse event rates were significantly higher than voluntary, clinician-only hospital incident report rates. The study was limited to pediatric hospitals on general pediatric and subspecialty services, though findings potentially may be applicable more broadly (for example, adult and surgical services).

Bottom Line: Using a structured interview, families report significantly higher rates of errors and adverse events, compared with other sources.

Reference: Khan A, Coffey M, Litterer KP, et al. Families as partners in hospital error and adverse event surveillance. JAMA Pediatrics. Published online Feb 27, 2017. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4812.

Publications
Sections

 

Clinical Question: Do family reports of adverse events improve incident detection, compared with clinician reports and hospital incident reports?

Background: Hospital incident reports, which are voluntary and suffer from underreporting, capture only a fraction of errors and adverse events (defined as errors resulting in harm). Systematic, prospective surveillance by researchers is the gold standard but is time consuming and expensive. The authors hypothesized that family reports would improve error and adverse event detection.

Study Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Four U.S. pediatric hospitals.

Synopsis: The authors developed a Family Safety Interview, administered weekly and on discharge, and compared reporting of errors and adverse events to clinician reports, hospital incident reports, and systematic review of records by researchers. Of 989 hospitalized pediatric patients, 746 parents/caregivers completed interviews between December 2014 and July 2015. From all sources, the authors found a total of 179 errors and 113 adverse events. Families reported a total of 39 of these 179 errors (including 19 unique errors not reported elsewhere) and 33 of 113 adverse events (8 unique).

Overall, error rates with family-reported errors were 15.5% higher (95% confidence interval, 9.0%-22.3%) than without. Adverse event rates with family reporting were 9.8% higher (95% CI, 3.1%-16.9%) than without. Family-reported error rates were 5 times higher (95% CI, 1.9-13.0) than hospital incident report rates.

The study showed that family-reported error and adverse event rates were significantly higher than voluntary, clinician-only hospital incident report rates. The study was limited to pediatric hospitals on general pediatric and subspecialty services, though findings potentially may be applicable more broadly (for example, adult and surgical services).

Bottom Line: Using a structured interview, families report significantly higher rates of errors and adverse events, compared with other sources.

Reference: Khan A, Coffey M, Litterer KP, et al. Families as partners in hospital error and adverse event surveillance. JAMA Pediatrics. Published online Feb 27, 2017. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4812.

 

Clinical Question: Do family reports of adverse events improve incident detection, compared with clinician reports and hospital incident reports?

Background: Hospital incident reports, which are voluntary and suffer from underreporting, capture only a fraction of errors and adverse events (defined as errors resulting in harm). Systematic, prospective surveillance by researchers is the gold standard but is time consuming and expensive. The authors hypothesized that family reports would improve error and adverse event detection.

Study Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Four U.S. pediatric hospitals.

Synopsis: The authors developed a Family Safety Interview, administered weekly and on discharge, and compared reporting of errors and adverse events to clinician reports, hospital incident reports, and systematic review of records by researchers. Of 989 hospitalized pediatric patients, 746 parents/caregivers completed interviews between December 2014 and July 2015. From all sources, the authors found a total of 179 errors and 113 adverse events. Families reported a total of 39 of these 179 errors (including 19 unique errors not reported elsewhere) and 33 of 113 adverse events (8 unique).

Overall, error rates with family-reported errors were 15.5% higher (95% confidence interval, 9.0%-22.3%) than without. Adverse event rates with family reporting were 9.8% higher (95% CI, 3.1%-16.9%) than without. Family-reported error rates were 5 times higher (95% CI, 1.9-13.0) than hospital incident report rates.

The study showed that family-reported error and adverse event rates were significantly higher than voluntary, clinician-only hospital incident report rates. The study was limited to pediatric hospitals on general pediatric and subspecialty services, though findings potentially may be applicable more broadly (for example, adult and surgical services).

Bottom Line: Using a structured interview, families report significantly higher rates of errors and adverse events, compared with other sources.

Reference: Khan A, Coffey M, Litterer KP, et al. Families as partners in hospital error and adverse event surveillance. JAMA Pediatrics. Published online Feb 27, 2017. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4812.

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Nautical metaphors build physician resilience, beat burnout

Article Type
Changed

 

– Linda L.M. Worley, MD, was stunned when a meeting she’d requested with her supervisor to address a shortage of beds turned into a rebuke.

“You’re on the tenure track, Linda. If you want to keep your job 6 years from now, you’d best pick up the pace. You need to see 20 private patients a week, and get moving on your research and publications,” Dr. Worley remembers the supervisor saying. At the time, she was a 32-year-old mother of two, wife, academic faculty physician, and sole attending running a general hospital consultation liaison psychiatry department and the college of medicine student mental health service. She also worked as the 24/7 on-call psychiatrist for a week at a time, said Dr. Worley, now a staff psychiatrist in the Fayetteville, Ark., Veterans Health Care System of the Ozarks and chief mental health officer for South Central VA Health Care Network.

Dr. Linda Worley
Dr. Worley’s immediate response was to go home and “collapse into anguished sobs,” she said in an interview. Her ultimate response, however, was to change tack, as a sailor does to make the most of how the wind is blowing. “When I told my husband I couldn’t manage and felt as though I was capsizing, he told me to ‘reef in my sails,’ ” she said, describing the technique sailors use to reduce their exposure to dangerously strong winds. “That was the day my Smooth Sailing Life nautical metaphor first crystallized.”

Over the decades of an academic medical career complete with tenure, and dozens of published articles and book chapters, Dr. Worley has developed a system for achieving success while avoiding burnout, based on nautical references. In a session cofacilitated by Cynthia M. Stonnington, MD, chair of psychiatry and psychology at the Mayo Clinic’s campus in Scottsdale, Ariz., Dr. Worley presented her tips for self-care at the annual meeting of the American College of Psychiatrists.

“I use the nautical framework as a bio-psycho-social-spiritual model,” Dr. Worley said in an interview. “I teach it to medical students; I teach it to residents; I teach it to distressed physicians. I even teach it to patients when I am explaining a framework for a necessary treatment approach. With sailing, you have to stay in balance. That’s the same with taking good care of ourselves so we are less likely to get sick physically and mentally,” said Dr. Worley, who commutes to Nashville, Tenn., several times a year as part of her appointment as an adjunct professor of medicine at Vanderbilt University.

Her “Smooth Sailing Life” seminars have evolved over the past 20 years and are rooted in her training in psychosomatic medicine, which she said emphasizes the complexity of the entire person. “It’s about the biology and about the emotions, and the bridge between them,” according to Dr. Worley, who has a website, SmoothSailingLife.com, and is working on a book aimed at helping to meet what she said has been a steadily growing thirst for her approach to developing resilience.

“I am not studying anyone, but I am helping people to self-diagnose. I teach people how to avoid having to see a psychiatrist or a mental health provider but also to feel good about reaching out for help when necessary,” she said. “Life is far too short to suffer needlessly.”

In the interview, Dr. Worley said she adapts her presentations to the venue and the time allowed. Key aspects of her system include:

• Care for your yacht, which is the body, including the brain. “You only get one, and if you’re going to have a chance of winning the regatta, you have to take care of it. This means getting good sleep, nutrition, exercise, preventive care, rest, and rejuvenation, including vacation,” Dr. Worley said.

• Chart your course; have a navigational plan that includes your life goals and aspirations. Identify and rely upon “landmarks,” such as being a good spouse, mother, physician, or friend for the most authentic definition of personal success. “These are like buoys that keep us sailing in the right direction,” she said.

• Reef in your sails, meaning mind the “winds that come at us from every side,” she said. This includes triaging tasks and not letting perfectionism get in the way. “Perfectionists take too long to tack; they don’t know when it’s time to turn in the other direction,” she said. “If you want to finish the race, you have to do the best you can in the time you have.” This was the lesson Dr. Worley said she learned that day when she was a young physician feeling overwhelmed.

• Empty your bilge, the nautical term for removing waste water from within the hull. Dr. Worley uses this as a metaphor for identifying and expressing negative emotions of fear, anxiety, sadness, and frustration. “These vital emotions are giving us important messages. It is important to recognize that they are present. Name and accept them, and understand what they are trying to tell us. Is it a symptom of an underlying illness that needs treatment? A conflict in a relationship? A need not being met? Are you living your deepest values? Express the emotions and sort through the best response,” she said. “It’s all part of emotional intelligence.”

• Keep an even keel, which is Dr. Worley’s way of stating the importance of being connected to love and to living your deepest values. “The keel is your character, your connection to meaning, a spiritual connection. In medicine, we shy away from that. I have only lately ventured into talking about this,” she said, noting that this connection can come in numerous ways, such as meditation, and being in nature or with animals. “It’s very personal. It’s hard to quantify, but I have witnessed it and its healing power within the therapeutic alliance.”

 

 

In break-out sessions during her well-attended talk at the meeting, Dr. Worley listened as psychiatrists of all levels of experience and responsibility, ranging from medical directors to those in private community practice, shared the kinds of concerns she said she often encounters in her role as a core faculty member of the Program for Distressed Physicians at the Vanderbilt Center for Professional Health.

“Changes in medicine have been so frustrating; physicians are at their wits’ end. We don’t recruit people into medicine because they have a skill set for expressing their emotions, or taking care of themselves, or dealing with conflict,” she said. “That’s okay. They can learn it.”

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Linda L.M. Worley, MD, was stunned when a meeting she’d requested with her supervisor to address a shortage of beds turned into a rebuke.

“You’re on the tenure track, Linda. If you want to keep your job 6 years from now, you’d best pick up the pace. You need to see 20 private patients a week, and get moving on your research and publications,” Dr. Worley remembers the supervisor saying. At the time, she was a 32-year-old mother of two, wife, academic faculty physician, and sole attending running a general hospital consultation liaison psychiatry department and the college of medicine student mental health service. She also worked as the 24/7 on-call psychiatrist for a week at a time, said Dr. Worley, now a staff psychiatrist in the Fayetteville, Ark., Veterans Health Care System of the Ozarks and chief mental health officer for South Central VA Health Care Network.

Dr. Linda Worley
Dr. Worley’s immediate response was to go home and “collapse into anguished sobs,” she said in an interview. Her ultimate response, however, was to change tack, as a sailor does to make the most of how the wind is blowing. “When I told my husband I couldn’t manage and felt as though I was capsizing, he told me to ‘reef in my sails,’ ” she said, describing the technique sailors use to reduce their exposure to dangerously strong winds. “That was the day my Smooth Sailing Life nautical metaphor first crystallized.”

Over the decades of an academic medical career complete with tenure, and dozens of published articles and book chapters, Dr. Worley has developed a system for achieving success while avoiding burnout, based on nautical references. In a session cofacilitated by Cynthia M. Stonnington, MD, chair of psychiatry and psychology at the Mayo Clinic’s campus in Scottsdale, Ariz., Dr. Worley presented her tips for self-care at the annual meeting of the American College of Psychiatrists.

“I use the nautical framework as a bio-psycho-social-spiritual model,” Dr. Worley said in an interview. “I teach it to medical students; I teach it to residents; I teach it to distressed physicians. I even teach it to patients when I am explaining a framework for a necessary treatment approach. With sailing, you have to stay in balance. That’s the same with taking good care of ourselves so we are less likely to get sick physically and mentally,” said Dr. Worley, who commutes to Nashville, Tenn., several times a year as part of her appointment as an adjunct professor of medicine at Vanderbilt University.

Her “Smooth Sailing Life” seminars have evolved over the past 20 years and are rooted in her training in psychosomatic medicine, which she said emphasizes the complexity of the entire person. “It’s about the biology and about the emotions, and the bridge between them,” according to Dr. Worley, who has a website, SmoothSailingLife.com, and is working on a book aimed at helping to meet what she said has been a steadily growing thirst for her approach to developing resilience.

“I am not studying anyone, but I am helping people to self-diagnose. I teach people how to avoid having to see a psychiatrist or a mental health provider but also to feel good about reaching out for help when necessary,” she said. “Life is far too short to suffer needlessly.”

In the interview, Dr. Worley said she adapts her presentations to the venue and the time allowed. Key aspects of her system include:

• Care for your yacht, which is the body, including the brain. “You only get one, and if you’re going to have a chance of winning the regatta, you have to take care of it. This means getting good sleep, nutrition, exercise, preventive care, rest, and rejuvenation, including vacation,” Dr. Worley said.

• Chart your course; have a navigational plan that includes your life goals and aspirations. Identify and rely upon “landmarks,” such as being a good spouse, mother, physician, or friend for the most authentic definition of personal success. “These are like buoys that keep us sailing in the right direction,” she said.

• Reef in your sails, meaning mind the “winds that come at us from every side,” she said. This includes triaging tasks and not letting perfectionism get in the way. “Perfectionists take too long to tack; they don’t know when it’s time to turn in the other direction,” she said. “If you want to finish the race, you have to do the best you can in the time you have.” This was the lesson Dr. Worley said she learned that day when she was a young physician feeling overwhelmed.

• Empty your bilge, the nautical term for removing waste water from within the hull. Dr. Worley uses this as a metaphor for identifying and expressing negative emotions of fear, anxiety, sadness, and frustration. “These vital emotions are giving us important messages. It is important to recognize that they are present. Name and accept them, and understand what they are trying to tell us. Is it a symptom of an underlying illness that needs treatment? A conflict in a relationship? A need not being met? Are you living your deepest values? Express the emotions and sort through the best response,” she said. “It’s all part of emotional intelligence.”

• Keep an even keel, which is Dr. Worley’s way of stating the importance of being connected to love and to living your deepest values. “The keel is your character, your connection to meaning, a spiritual connection. In medicine, we shy away from that. I have only lately ventured into talking about this,” she said, noting that this connection can come in numerous ways, such as meditation, and being in nature or with animals. “It’s very personal. It’s hard to quantify, but I have witnessed it and its healing power within the therapeutic alliance.”

 

 

In break-out sessions during her well-attended talk at the meeting, Dr. Worley listened as psychiatrists of all levels of experience and responsibility, ranging from medical directors to those in private community practice, shared the kinds of concerns she said she often encounters in her role as a core faculty member of the Program for Distressed Physicians at the Vanderbilt Center for Professional Health.

“Changes in medicine have been so frustrating; physicians are at their wits’ end. We don’t recruit people into medicine because they have a skill set for expressing their emotions, or taking care of themselves, or dealing with conflict,” she said. “That’s okay. They can learn it.”

 

– Linda L.M. Worley, MD, was stunned when a meeting she’d requested with her supervisor to address a shortage of beds turned into a rebuke.

“You’re on the tenure track, Linda. If you want to keep your job 6 years from now, you’d best pick up the pace. You need to see 20 private patients a week, and get moving on your research and publications,” Dr. Worley remembers the supervisor saying. At the time, she was a 32-year-old mother of two, wife, academic faculty physician, and sole attending running a general hospital consultation liaison psychiatry department and the college of medicine student mental health service. She also worked as the 24/7 on-call psychiatrist for a week at a time, said Dr. Worley, now a staff psychiatrist in the Fayetteville, Ark., Veterans Health Care System of the Ozarks and chief mental health officer for South Central VA Health Care Network.

Dr. Linda Worley
Dr. Worley’s immediate response was to go home and “collapse into anguished sobs,” she said in an interview. Her ultimate response, however, was to change tack, as a sailor does to make the most of how the wind is blowing. “When I told my husband I couldn’t manage and felt as though I was capsizing, he told me to ‘reef in my sails,’ ” she said, describing the technique sailors use to reduce their exposure to dangerously strong winds. “That was the day my Smooth Sailing Life nautical metaphor first crystallized.”

Over the decades of an academic medical career complete with tenure, and dozens of published articles and book chapters, Dr. Worley has developed a system for achieving success while avoiding burnout, based on nautical references. In a session cofacilitated by Cynthia M. Stonnington, MD, chair of psychiatry and psychology at the Mayo Clinic’s campus in Scottsdale, Ariz., Dr. Worley presented her tips for self-care at the annual meeting of the American College of Psychiatrists.

“I use the nautical framework as a bio-psycho-social-spiritual model,” Dr. Worley said in an interview. “I teach it to medical students; I teach it to residents; I teach it to distressed physicians. I even teach it to patients when I am explaining a framework for a necessary treatment approach. With sailing, you have to stay in balance. That’s the same with taking good care of ourselves so we are less likely to get sick physically and mentally,” said Dr. Worley, who commutes to Nashville, Tenn., several times a year as part of her appointment as an adjunct professor of medicine at Vanderbilt University.

Her “Smooth Sailing Life” seminars have evolved over the past 20 years and are rooted in her training in psychosomatic medicine, which she said emphasizes the complexity of the entire person. “It’s about the biology and about the emotions, and the bridge between them,” according to Dr. Worley, who has a website, SmoothSailingLife.com, and is working on a book aimed at helping to meet what she said has been a steadily growing thirst for her approach to developing resilience.

“I am not studying anyone, but I am helping people to self-diagnose. I teach people how to avoid having to see a psychiatrist or a mental health provider but also to feel good about reaching out for help when necessary,” she said. “Life is far too short to suffer needlessly.”

In the interview, Dr. Worley said she adapts her presentations to the venue and the time allowed. Key aspects of her system include:

• Care for your yacht, which is the body, including the brain. “You only get one, and if you’re going to have a chance of winning the regatta, you have to take care of it. This means getting good sleep, nutrition, exercise, preventive care, rest, and rejuvenation, including vacation,” Dr. Worley said.

• Chart your course; have a navigational plan that includes your life goals and aspirations. Identify and rely upon “landmarks,” such as being a good spouse, mother, physician, or friend for the most authentic definition of personal success. “These are like buoys that keep us sailing in the right direction,” she said.

• Reef in your sails, meaning mind the “winds that come at us from every side,” she said. This includes triaging tasks and not letting perfectionism get in the way. “Perfectionists take too long to tack; they don’t know when it’s time to turn in the other direction,” she said. “If you want to finish the race, you have to do the best you can in the time you have.” This was the lesson Dr. Worley said she learned that day when she was a young physician feeling overwhelmed.

• Empty your bilge, the nautical term for removing waste water from within the hull. Dr. Worley uses this as a metaphor for identifying and expressing negative emotions of fear, anxiety, sadness, and frustration. “These vital emotions are giving us important messages. It is important to recognize that they are present. Name and accept them, and understand what they are trying to tell us. Is it a symptom of an underlying illness that needs treatment? A conflict in a relationship? A need not being met? Are you living your deepest values? Express the emotions and sort through the best response,” she said. “It’s all part of emotional intelligence.”

• Keep an even keel, which is Dr. Worley’s way of stating the importance of being connected to love and to living your deepest values. “The keel is your character, your connection to meaning, a spiritual connection. In medicine, we shy away from that. I have only lately ventured into talking about this,” she said, noting that this connection can come in numerous ways, such as meditation, and being in nature or with animals. “It’s very personal. It’s hard to quantify, but I have witnessed it and its healing power within the therapeutic alliance.”

 

 

In break-out sessions during her well-attended talk at the meeting, Dr. Worley listened as psychiatrists of all levels of experience and responsibility, ranging from medical directors to those in private community practice, shared the kinds of concerns she said she often encounters in her role as a core faculty member of the Program for Distressed Physicians at the Vanderbilt Center for Professional Health.

“Changes in medicine have been so frustrating; physicians are at their wits’ end. We don’t recruit people into medicine because they have a skill set for expressing their emotions, or taking care of themselves, or dealing with conflict,” she said. “That’s okay. They can learn it.”

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS MEETING

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Cosmetic Corner: Dermatologists Weigh in on Face Scrubs

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Cosmetic Corner: Dermatologists Weigh in on Face Scrubs

To improve patient care and outcomes, leading dermatologists offered their recommendations on face scrubs. Consideration must be given to:

  • Crystal Peel Microdermabrasion Exfoliating Face Crème
    Formulary for Physicians, Inc

    “This product is a highly effective facial scrub for patients with thick skin. Its exfoliating ingredient is corundum, another name for aluminum oxide, the crystal used by most microabrasion machines.”— Mark G. Rubin, MD, Beverly Hills, California

     
  • Facial Fuel Energizing Scrub
    Kiehl’s

    Recommended by Gary Goldenberg, MD, New York, New York

     
  • Olay Regenerist Regenerating Cream Cleanser
    Procter & Gamble

    “Oxygenated beads in the creamy formula help to gently exfoliate the skin without overdrying and stripping the skin’s outer layer, leaving the skin soft and fresh.”—Jeannette Graf, MD, New York, New York

     
  • PRESCRIBEDsolutions: Starting Up/Face, Surface Improvement
    Biopelle, Inc

    “I use Starting Up/Face as my daily cleanser, as it contains salicylic acid and helps improve the overall texture plus minimize bumps from shaving, and Surface Improvement about every other day on my face in the shower.”—Joel L. Cohen, MD, Greenwood Village, Colorado

     
  • St. Ives Apricot Blemish Control Scrub
    Unilever

    “It exfoliates and has salicylic acid. After exfoliating, I recommend allowing it to sit on the skin for 5 minutes before washing off.”—Anthony M. Rossi, MD, New York, New York

 

Cutis invites readers to send us their recommendations. Athlete’s foot treatments, cleansing devices, and redness-reducing products will be featured in upcoming editions of Cosmetic Corner. Please e-mail your recommendation(s) to the Editorial Office.

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Cutis or Frontline Medical Communications Inc. and shall not be used for product endorsement purposes. Any reference made to a specific commercial product does not indicate or imply that Cutis or Frontline Medical Communications Inc. endorses, recommends, or favors the product mentioned. No guarantee is given to the effects of recommended products.

Publications
Topics
Sections

To improve patient care and outcomes, leading dermatologists offered their recommendations on face scrubs. Consideration must be given to:

  • Crystal Peel Microdermabrasion Exfoliating Face Crème
    Formulary for Physicians, Inc

    “This product is a highly effective facial scrub for patients with thick skin. Its exfoliating ingredient is corundum, another name for aluminum oxide, the crystal used by most microabrasion machines.”— Mark G. Rubin, MD, Beverly Hills, California

     
  • Facial Fuel Energizing Scrub
    Kiehl’s

    Recommended by Gary Goldenberg, MD, New York, New York

     
  • Olay Regenerist Regenerating Cream Cleanser
    Procter & Gamble

    “Oxygenated beads in the creamy formula help to gently exfoliate the skin without overdrying and stripping the skin’s outer layer, leaving the skin soft and fresh.”—Jeannette Graf, MD, New York, New York

     
  • PRESCRIBEDsolutions: Starting Up/Face, Surface Improvement
    Biopelle, Inc

    “I use Starting Up/Face as my daily cleanser, as it contains salicylic acid and helps improve the overall texture plus minimize bumps from shaving, and Surface Improvement about every other day on my face in the shower.”—Joel L. Cohen, MD, Greenwood Village, Colorado

     
  • St. Ives Apricot Blemish Control Scrub
    Unilever

    “It exfoliates and has salicylic acid. After exfoliating, I recommend allowing it to sit on the skin for 5 minutes before washing off.”—Anthony M. Rossi, MD, New York, New York

 

Cutis invites readers to send us their recommendations. Athlete’s foot treatments, cleansing devices, and redness-reducing products will be featured in upcoming editions of Cosmetic Corner. Please e-mail your recommendation(s) to the Editorial Office.

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Cutis or Frontline Medical Communications Inc. and shall not be used for product endorsement purposes. Any reference made to a specific commercial product does not indicate or imply that Cutis or Frontline Medical Communications Inc. endorses, recommends, or favors the product mentioned. No guarantee is given to the effects of recommended products.

To improve patient care and outcomes, leading dermatologists offered their recommendations on face scrubs. Consideration must be given to:

  • Crystal Peel Microdermabrasion Exfoliating Face Crème
    Formulary for Physicians, Inc

    “This product is a highly effective facial scrub for patients with thick skin. Its exfoliating ingredient is corundum, another name for aluminum oxide, the crystal used by most microabrasion machines.”— Mark G. Rubin, MD, Beverly Hills, California

     
  • Facial Fuel Energizing Scrub
    Kiehl’s

    Recommended by Gary Goldenberg, MD, New York, New York

     
  • Olay Regenerist Regenerating Cream Cleanser
    Procter & Gamble

    “Oxygenated beads in the creamy formula help to gently exfoliate the skin without overdrying and stripping the skin’s outer layer, leaving the skin soft and fresh.”—Jeannette Graf, MD, New York, New York

     
  • PRESCRIBEDsolutions: Starting Up/Face, Surface Improvement
    Biopelle, Inc

    “I use Starting Up/Face as my daily cleanser, as it contains salicylic acid and helps improve the overall texture plus minimize bumps from shaving, and Surface Improvement about every other day on my face in the shower.”—Joel L. Cohen, MD, Greenwood Village, Colorado

     
  • St. Ives Apricot Blemish Control Scrub
    Unilever

    “It exfoliates and has salicylic acid. After exfoliating, I recommend allowing it to sit on the skin for 5 minutes before washing off.”—Anthony M. Rossi, MD, New York, New York

 

Cutis invites readers to send us their recommendations. Athlete’s foot treatments, cleansing devices, and redness-reducing products will be featured in upcoming editions of Cosmetic Corner. Please e-mail your recommendation(s) to the Editorial Office.

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Cutis or Frontline Medical Communications Inc. and shall not be used for product endorsement purposes. Any reference made to a specific commercial product does not indicate or imply that Cutis or Frontline Medical Communications Inc. endorses, recommends, or favors the product mentioned. No guarantee is given to the effects of recommended products.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Cosmetic Corner: Dermatologists Weigh in on Face Scrubs
Display Headline
Cosmetic Corner: Dermatologists Weigh in on Face Scrubs
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Public favors Obamacare over Trumpcare

Article Type
Changed

 

The American Health Care Act, the House Republicans’ replacement for the Affordable Care Act, is currently viewed less favorably than its predecessor, according to a new poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation.

In the survey, 40% of respondents said that they had a “very unfavorable” opinion of the AHCA, compared with 29% for the ACA. The “very favorable” opinions also favored the ACA: 29% to 12%, according to a Kaiser report released May 31.

The main difference in support for the two plans comes from independent voters, 48% of whom have a favorable view of the ACA, compared with just 30% for the AHCA, the report noted. Despite a lack of support for the AHCA, 74% of all respondents said that it is “very likely” or “somewhat likely” that the ACA will be repealed and replaced.

The Kaiser Health Tracking Poll involved 1,205 adults and was conducted May 16-22, 2017.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The American Health Care Act, the House Republicans’ replacement for the Affordable Care Act, is currently viewed less favorably than its predecessor, according to a new poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation.

In the survey, 40% of respondents said that they had a “very unfavorable” opinion of the AHCA, compared with 29% for the ACA. The “very favorable” opinions also favored the ACA: 29% to 12%, according to a Kaiser report released May 31.

The main difference in support for the two plans comes from independent voters, 48% of whom have a favorable view of the ACA, compared with just 30% for the AHCA, the report noted. Despite a lack of support for the AHCA, 74% of all respondents said that it is “very likely” or “somewhat likely” that the ACA will be repealed and replaced.

The Kaiser Health Tracking Poll involved 1,205 adults and was conducted May 16-22, 2017.

 

The American Health Care Act, the House Republicans’ replacement for the Affordable Care Act, is currently viewed less favorably than its predecessor, according to a new poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation.

In the survey, 40% of respondents said that they had a “very unfavorable” opinion of the AHCA, compared with 29% for the ACA. The “very favorable” opinions also favored the ACA: 29% to 12%, according to a Kaiser report released May 31.

The main difference in support for the two plans comes from independent voters, 48% of whom have a favorable view of the ACA, compared with just 30% for the AHCA, the report noted. Despite a lack of support for the AHCA, 74% of all respondents said that it is “very likely” or “somewhat likely” that the ACA will be repealed and replaced.

The Kaiser Health Tracking Poll involved 1,205 adults and was conducted May 16-22, 2017.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Immunization requirements, availability vary in U.S. universities

Article Type
Changed

 

A survey of public and private colleges and universities throughout the United States has revealed marked variation in the requirements for vaccination in the enrollment process and vaccine availability through on-campus student health.

The policies of the institutions usually reflected the policies of the particular state or district.

copyright luiscar/Thinkstock
“It was a bit depressing to see less than 15% of the schools required vaccination for meningococcal disease,” said Kristen A. Feemster, MD, director of research for the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, adding that learning more of the reasoning behind the decision-making for required vaccinations is a priority.

The cross-sectional study surveyed two private and two publicly-funded 4-year degree-granting colleges or universities in each state and the District of Columbia – 216 institutions in total. The institutions were randomly selected to reflect the diversities in size, religious affiliations, and type of institution. The institutions’ websites were scrutinized for information on immunization requirements, vaccinations needed prior to enrollment, vaccination options available on-campus, and consequence of failure to obtain the necessary vaccinations.

© Ingram Publishing/Thinkstock
Of the institutions, 52% were private, about 80% had an enrollment exceeding 5,000, and one-third had an enrollment of over 20,000 students. About 18% of the schools were located in states with no vaccine requirements for college/university students.

A wide variation in vaccine requirements and on-campus availability was evident. MMR vaccination was an admission requirement of about 82% of the schools surveyed. Vaccination was best done prior to arrival on campus, as only 42% of the surveyed colleges and universities offered the vaccine through student health. Vaccination for hepatitis B was required by only 31% of colleges/universities, with 44% offering the vaccine through student health. Vaccination for hepatitis A was required by only about 1% of the surveyed institutions, although the vaccine was available on one-third of the campuses, Dr. Feemster said at the Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting.

Meningococcal B (MenB) vaccination was required by 25 schools, of which 6 (24%) had experienced MenB illness outbreaks. Of the 191 schools that did not have a requirement for MenB vaccination, only 4 (2.0%) had experienced a MenB outbreak.

Of contemporary concern, vaccination for human papillomavirus was offered by one-third of the colleges/universities, but this vaccination was not a requirement for admission to any of the surveyed institutions. Vaccination for influenza, another disease with a high propensity to spread, also was not required by any school, with only 37% having influenza vaccination available as part of student health care.

Compliance with immunization requirements was enforced by 67% of the schools, with course registration not finalized until the necessary vaccinations had been received and documented. Of the 17% of schools that did not have an enforcement policy, 61% cited the vaccine requirements of their particular state, the assumption being that the incoming students from that state would have received the necessary vaccinations, reflecting a more reactive than proactive stance, according to Dr. Feemster. There was no difference in enforcement strategy between the public or private institutions.

Of the surveyed vaccines, at least some were available at just over 91% of the public institutions and at 76% of the private institutions

“The variation in requirements and enforcement suggest inconsistent vaccine uptake. Next steps include a mixed-methods study to measure attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors related to school vaccine policy among a national sample of college students and to identify facilitators and barriers to school vaccine policy implementation among school health administrators and providers,” said Dr. Feemster.

“The ultimate goal is to identify the best practices for implementation of college vaccine policies to optimize vaccine uptake and increase positive attitudes, beliefs, and future intentions about vaccines,” she added.

The sponsor of study was the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. The study was not funded. Dr. Feemster had no conflicts to disclose.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

A survey of public and private colleges and universities throughout the United States has revealed marked variation in the requirements for vaccination in the enrollment process and vaccine availability through on-campus student health.

The policies of the institutions usually reflected the policies of the particular state or district.

copyright luiscar/Thinkstock
“It was a bit depressing to see less than 15% of the schools required vaccination for meningococcal disease,” said Kristen A. Feemster, MD, director of research for the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, adding that learning more of the reasoning behind the decision-making for required vaccinations is a priority.

The cross-sectional study surveyed two private and two publicly-funded 4-year degree-granting colleges or universities in each state and the District of Columbia – 216 institutions in total. The institutions were randomly selected to reflect the diversities in size, religious affiliations, and type of institution. The institutions’ websites were scrutinized for information on immunization requirements, vaccinations needed prior to enrollment, vaccination options available on-campus, and consequence of failure to obtain the necessary vaccinations.

© Ingram Publishing/Thinkstock
Of the institutions, 52% were private, about 80% had an enrollment exceeding 5,000, and one-third had an enrollment of over 20,000 students. About 18% of the schools were located in states with no vaccine requirements for college/university students.

A wide variation in vaccine requirements and on-campus availability was evident. MMR vaccination was an admission requirement of about 82% of the schools surveyed. Vaccination was best done prior to arrival on campus, as only 42% of the surveyed colleges and universities offered the vaccine through student health. Vaccination for hepatitis B was required by only 31% of colleges/universities, with 44% offering the vaccine through student health. Vaccination for hepatitis A was required by only about 1% of the surveyed institutions, although the vaccine was available on one-third of the campuses, Dr. Feemster said at the Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting.

Meningococcal B (MenB) vaccination was required by 25 schools, of which 6 (24%) had experienced MenB illness outbreaks. Of the 191 schools that did not have a requirement for MenB vaccination, only 4 (2.0%) had experienced a MenB outbreak.

Of contemporary concern, vaccination for human papillomavirus was offered by one-third of the colleges/universities, but this vaccination was not a requirement for admission to any of the surveyed institutions. Vaccination for influenza, another disease with a high propensity to spread, also was not required by any school, with only 37% having influenza vaccination available as part of student health care.

Compliance with immunization requirements was enforced by 67% of the schools, with course registration not finalized until the necessary vaccinations had been received and documented. Of the 17% of schools that did not have an enforcement policy, 61% cited the vaccine requirements of their particular state, the assumption being that the incoming students from that state would have received the necessary vaccinations, reflecting a more reactive than proactive stance, according to Dr. Feemster. There was no difference in enforcement strategy between the public or private institutions.

Of the surveyed vaccines, at least some were available at just over 91% of the public institutions and at 76% of the private institutions

“The variation in requirements and enforcement suggest inconsistent vaccine uptake. Next steps include a mixed-methods study to measure attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors related to school vaccine policy among a national sample of college students and to identify facilitators and barriers to school vaccine policy implementation among school health administrators and providers,” said Dr. Feemster.

“The ultimate goal is to identify the best practices for implementation of college vaccine policies to optimize vaccine uptake and increase positive attitudes, beliefs, and future intentions about vaccines,” she added.

The sponsor of study was the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. The study was not funded. Dr. Feemster had no conflicts to disclose.

 

A survey of public and private colleges and universities throughout the United States has revealed marked variation in the requirements for vaccination in the enrollment process and vaccine availability through on-campus student health.

The policies of the institutions usually reflected the policies of the particular state or district.

copyright luiscar/Thinkstock
“It was a bit depressing to see less than 15% of the schools required vaccination for meningococcal disease,” said Kristen A. Feemster, MD, director of research for the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, adding that learning more of the reasoning behind the decision-making for required vaccinations is a priority.

The cross-sectional study surveyed two private and two publicly-funded 4-year degree-granting colleges or universities in each state and the District of Columbia – 216 institutions in total. The institutions were randomly selected to reflect the diversities in size, religious affiliations, and type of institution. The institutions’ websites were scrutinized for information on immunization requirements, vaccinations needed prior to enrollment, vaccination options available on-campus, and consequence of failure to obtain the necessary vaccinations.

© Ingram Publishing/Thinkstock
Of the institutions, 52% were private, about 80% had an enrollment exceeding 5,000, and one-third had an enrollment of over 20,000 students. About 18% of the schools were located in states with no vaccine requirements for college/university students.

A wide variation in vaccine requirements and on-campus availability was evident. MMR vaccination was an admission requirement of about 82% of the schools surveyed. Vaccination was best done prior to arrival on campus, as only 42% of the surveyed colleges and universities offered the vaccine through student health. Vaccination for hepatitis B was required by only 31% of colleges/universities, with 44% offering the vaccine through student health. Vaccination for hepatitis A was required by only about 1% of the surveyed institutions, although the vaccine was available on one-third of the campuses, Dr. Feemster said at the Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting.

Meningococcal B (MenB) vaccination was required by 25 schools, of which 6 (24%) had experienced MenB illness outbreaks. Of the 191 schools that did not have a requirement for MenB vaccination, only 4 (2.0%) had experienced a MenB outbreak.

Of contemporary concern, vaccination for human papillomavirus was offered by one-third of the colleges/universities, but this vaccination was not a requirement for admission to any of the surveyed institutions. Vaccination for influenza, another disease with a high propensity to spread, also was not required by any school, with only 37% having influenza vaccination available as part of student health care.

Compliance with immunization requirements was enforced by 67% of the schools, with course registration not finalized until the necessary vaccinations had been received and documented. Of the 17% of schools that did not have an enforcement policy, 61% cited the vaccine requirements of their particular state, the assumption being that the incoming students from that state would have received the necessary vaccinations, reflecting a more reactive than proactive stance, according to Dr. Feemster. There was no difference in enforcement strategy between the public or private institutions.

Of the surveyed vaccines, at least some were available at just over 91% of the public institutions and at 76% of the private institutions

“The variation in requirements and enforcement suggest inconsistent vaccine uptake. Next steps include a mixed-methods study to measure attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors related to school vaccine policy among a national sample of college students and to identify facilitators and barriers to school vaccine policy implementation among school health administrators and providers,” said Dr. Feemster.

“The ultimate goal is to identify the best practices for implementation of college vaccine policies to optimize vaccine uptake and increase positive attitudes, beliefs, and future intentions about vaccines,” she added.

The sponsor of study was the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. The study was not funded. Dr. Feemster had no conflicts to disclose.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT PAS 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: A survey of colleges and universities nationwide in the United States has revealed marked variation in vaccination requirements and vaccine availability.

Major finding: Of the two public and two private schools surveyed in each state and the District of Columbia, none require vaccination for human papillomavirus, with only one-third of schools having the vaccine available through student health.

Data source: Cross-sectional survey of 216 U.S. colleges and universities.

Disclosures: The sponsor of the study was the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. The study was not funded. Dr. Feemster had no conflicts to disclose.

Here’s what’s trending at SHM

Article Type
Changed
The latest news about upcoming events, new programs, and SHM initiatives

 

HM17 On Demand now available

Couldn’t make it to Las Vegas for SHM’s annual meeting, Hospital Medicine 2017? HM17 On Demand gives you access to over 80 online audio and slide recordings from the hottest tracks, including clinical updates, rapid fire, pediatrics, comanagement, quality, and high-value care.

Additionally, you can earn up to 70 American Medical Association Physician Recognition Award Category 1 Credit(s) and up to 30 American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification credits. HM17 attendees can also benefit by earning additional credits on the sessions you missed out on.

To easily access content through SHM’s Learning Portal, visit shmlearningportal.org/hm17-demand to learn more.
 

Chapter Excellence Awards

SHM is proud to recognize outstanding chapters for the fourth annual Chapter Excellence Awards. Each year, chapters strive to demonstrate growth, sustenance, and innovation within their chapter activities.

View more at www.hospitalmedicine.org/chapterexcellence. Please join SHM in congratulating the following chapters on their success!

Silver Chapters

Boston Association of Academic Hospital Medicine (BAAHM)

Charlotte Metro Area

Houston

Kentucky

Los Angeles

Minnesota

North Jersey

Pacific Northwest

Philadelphia Tri-State

Rocky Mountain

San Francisco Bay

South Central PA

Gold Chapters

New Mexico

Wiregrass

Platinum Chapters

IowaMaryland

Michigan

NYC/Westchester

St. Louis

Outstanding Chapter of the Year

Michigan

Rising Star Chapter

Wiregrass
 

Student Hospitalist Scholar grant winners

SHM’s Student Hospitalist Scholar Grant provides funds with which medical students can conduct mentored scholarly projects related to quality improvement and patient safety in the field of hospital medicine. The program offers a summer and a longitudinal option.

Congratulations to the 2017-2018 Student Hospitalist Scholar Grant recipients:Summer Program

Anton Garazha

Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science

“Effectiveness of Communication During ICU to Ward Transfer and Association with Medical ICU Readmission”

Cole Hirschfeld

Weill Cornell Medical College

“The Role of Diagnostic Bone Biopsies in the Management of Osteomyelitis”

Farah Hussain

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

“Better Understanding Clinical Deterioration in a Children’s Hospital”

Longitudinal Program

Monisha Bhatia

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine

“Using Electronic Medical Record Phenotypic Data to Predict Discharge Destination”

Victor Ekuta

University of California, San Diego School of Medicine

“Reducing CAUTI with Noninvasive UC Alternatives and Measure-vention”

Yun Li

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth

“Developing and implementing clinical pathway(s) for hospitalized injection drug users due to injection-related infection sequelae”

Learn more about the Student Hospitalist Scholar Grant at hospitalmedicine.org/scholargrant.

SPARK ONE: A tool to teach residents

SPARK ONE is a comprehensive, online self-assessment tool created specifically for hospital medicine professionals. The activity contains 450+ vignette-style multiple-choice questions covering 100% of the American Board of Internal Medicine’s Focused Practice in Hospital Medicine (FPHM) exam blueprint. This online tool can be utilized as a training mechanism for resident education on hospital medicine.

SHM Trending News and Notes

As a benefit of SHM membership, residents will receive a free subscription. SPARK ONE provides in-depth review of the following content areas:

  • Cardiology
  • Pulmonary Disease and Critical Care Medicine
  • Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Nephrology and Urology
  • Endocrinology
  • Hematology and Oncology
  • Neurology
  • Allergy, Immunology, Dermatology, Rheumatology and Transitions in Care
  • Palliative Care, Medical Ethics and Decision-making
  • Perioperative Medicine and Consultative Co-management
  • Patient Safety
  • Quality, Cost and Clinical Reasoning

“SPARK ONE provides a unique platform for academic institutions, engaging learners in directed learning sessions, reinforcing teaching points as we encounter specific conditions.” – Rachel E. Thompson, MD, MPH, SFHM

Visit hospitalmedicine.org/sparkone to learn more.
 

Sharpen your coding with the updated CODE-H

SHM’s Coding Optimally by Documenting Effectively for Hospitalists (CODE-H) has launched an updated program with all new content. It will now include eight recorded webinar sessions presented by expert faculty, downloadable resources, and an interactive discussion forum through the Hospital Medicine Exchange (HMX), enabling participants to ask questions and learn the most relevant best practices.

Following each webinar, learners will have the opportunity to complete an evaluation to redeem continuing medical education credits.

Webinars in the series include:
 

  • E/M Basics Part I
  • E/M Basics Part II
  • Utilizing Other Providers in Your Practice
  • EMR and Mitigating Risk
  • Putting Time into Critical Care Documentation
  • Time Based Services
  • Navigating the Rules for Hospitalist Visits
  • Challenges of Concurrent Care

To purchase CODE-H, visit hospitalmedicine.org/CODEH. If you have questions about the new program, please contact [email protected].
 

Set yourself apart as a Fellow in Hospital Medicine

The Fellow in Hospital Medicine (FHM) designation signals your commitment to the hospital medicine specialty and dedication to quality improvement and patient safety. This designation is available for hospital medicine practitioners, including practice administrators, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. If you meet the prerequisites and complete the requirements, which are rooted in the Core Competencies in Hospital Medicine, you can apply for this prestigious designation and join more than 1,100 FHMs who are dedicated to the field of hospital medicine. Learn more and apply at hospitalmedicine.org/fellow.

 

 

New guide & modules on multimodal pain strategies for postoperative pain management

Pain management can pose multiple challenges in the acute care setting for hospitalists and front-line prescribers. While their first priority is to optimally manage pain in their patients, they also face the challenges of treating diverse patient populations, managing patient expectations, and considering how pain control and perceptions affect Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores. Furthermore, because of the ongoing opioid epidemic, prescribers must ensure that pain is managed responsibly and ethically.

To address these issues, SHM developed a guide to address how to work in an interdisciplinary team, identify impediments to implementation, and provide examples of appropriate pain management. In accompaniment with this Multimodal Pain Strategies Guide for Postoperative Pain Management, there are three modules presented by the authors which supplement the electronic guide.

To download the guide or view the modules, visit hospitalmedicine.org/pain.
 

Proven excellence through a unique education style: Academic Hospitalist Academy

Don’t miss the eighth annual Academic Hospitalist Academy (AHA), Sept. 25-28, 2017, at the Lakeway Resort and Spa in Austin, Texas. AHA attendees experience an energizing, interactive learning environment featuring didactics, small-group exercise and skill-building breakout sessions. Each full day of learning is facilitated by leading clinician-educators, hospitalist researchers, and clinical administrators in a 1 to 10 faculty to student ratio.

The Principal Goals of the Academy are to:

  • Develop junior academic hospitalists as the premier teachers and educational leaders at their institutions
  • Help academic hospitalists develop scholarly work and increase scholarly output
  • Enhance awareness of the value of quality improvement and patient safety work
  • Support academic promotion of all attendees

Don’t miss out on this unique, hands-on experience. Register before July 18, 2017, to receive the early-bird rates. Visit academichospitalist.org to learn more.
 

Choosing Wisely Case Study compendium now available

The Choosing Wisely Case Study Competition, hosted by SHM, sought submissions from hospitalists on innovative improvement initiatives implemented in their respective institutions. These initiatives reflect and promote movement toward reducing unnecessary medical tests and procedures and changing a culture that dictates, “More care is better care.”

Submissions were judged by the Choosing Wisely Subcommittee, a panel of SHM members, under adult and pediatric categories. One grand prize winner and three honorable mentions were selected from these categories. The compendium includes these case studies along with additional exemplary submissions.

View the Choosing Wisely Case Study Compendium at hospitalmedicine.org/choosingwisely.
 

Strengthen your interactions with the 5 Rs of Cultural Humility

Look inside this issue for your 5 Rs of Cultural Humility pocket card. It can be easily referenced on rounds and shared with colleagues. We hope to achieve heightened awareness of effective interactions. In addition to the definitions of each of the Rs, the card features questions to ask yourself before, during, and after every interaction to aid in attaining cultural humility.

For more information, visit hospitalmedicine.org/5Rs.

Brett Radler is communications specialist at the Society of Hospital Medicine.

Publications
Topics
Sections
The latest news about upcoming events, new programs, and SHM initiatives
The latest news about upcoming events, new programs, and SHM initiatives

 

HM17 On Demand now available

Couldn’t make it to Las Vegas for SHM’s annual meeting, Hospital Medicine 2017? HM17 On Demand gives you access to over 80 online audio and slide recordings from the hottest tracks, including clinical updates, rapid fire, pediatrics, comanagement, quality, and high-value care.

Additionally, you can earn up to 70 American Medical Association Physician Recognition Award Category 1 Credit(s) and up to 30 American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification credits. HM17 attendees can also benefit by earning additional credits on the sessions you missed out on.

To easily access content through SHM’s Learning Portal, visit shmlearningportal.org/hm17-demand to learn more.
 

Chapter Excellence Awards

SHM is proud to recognize outstanding chapters for the fourth annual Chapter Excellence Awards. Each year, chapters strive to demonstrate growth, sustenance, and innovation within their chapter activities.

View more at www.hospitalmedicine.org/chapterexcellence. Please join SHM in congratulating the following chapters on their success!

Silver Chapters

Boston Association of Academic Hospital Medicine (BAAHM)

Charlotte Metro Area

Houston

Kentucky

Los Angeles

Minnesota

North Jersey

Pacific Northwest

Philadelphia Tri-State

Rocky Mountain

San Francisco Bay

South Central PA

Gold Chapters

New Mexico

Wiregrass

Platinum Chapters

IowaMaryland

Michigan

NYC/Westchester

St. Louis

Outstanding Chapter of the Year

Michigan

Rising Star Chapter

Wiregrass
 

Student Hospitalist Scholar grant winners

SHM’s Student Hospitalist Scholar Grant provides funds with which medical students can conduct mentored scholarly projects related to quality improvement and patient safety in the field of hospital medicine. The program offers a summer and a longitudinal option.

Congratulations to the 2017-2018 Student Hospitalist Scholar Grant recipients:Summer Program

Anton Garazha

Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science

“Effectiveness of Communication During ICU to Ward Transfer and Association with Medical ICU Readmission”

Cole Hirschfeld

Weill Cornell Medical College

“The Role of Diagnostic Bone Biopsies in the Management of Osteomyelitis”

Farah Hussain

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

“Better Understanding Clinical Deterioration in a Children’s Hospital”

Longitudinal Program

Monisha Bhatia

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine

“Using Electronic Medical Record Phenotypic Data to Predict Discharge Destination”

Victor Ekuta

University of California, San Diego School of Medicine

“Reducing CAUTI with Noninvasive UC Alternatives and Measure-vention”

Yun Li

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth

“Developing and implementing clinical pathway(s) for hospitalized injection drug users due to injection-related infection sequelae”

Learn more about the Student Hospitalist Scholar Grant at hospitalmedicine.org/scholargrant.

SPARK ONE: A tool to teach residents

SPARK ONE is a comprehensive, online self-assessment tool created specifically for hospital medicine professionals. The activity contains 450+ vignette-style multiple-choice questions covering 100% of the American Board of Internal Medicine’s Focused Practice in Hospital Medicine (FPHM) exam blueprint. This online tool can be utilized as a training mechanism for resident education on hospital medicine.

SHM Trending News and Notes

As a benefit of SHM membership, residents will receive a free subscription. SPARK ONE provides in-depth review of the following content areas:

  • Cardiology
  • Pulmonary Disease and Critical Care Medicine
  • Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Nephrology and Urology
  • Endocrinology
  • Hematology and Oncology
  • Neurology
  • Allergy, Immunology, Dermatology, Rheumatology and Transitions in Care
  • Palliative Care, Medical Ethics and Decision-making
  • Perioperative Medicine and Consultative Co-management
  • Patient Safety
  • Quality, Cost and Clinical Reasoning

“SPARK ONE provides a unique platform for academic institutions, engaging learners in directed learning sessions, reinforcing teaching points as we encounter specific conditions.” – Rachel E. Thompson, MD, MPH, SFHM

Visit hospitalmedicine.org/sparkone to learn more.
 

Sharpen your coding with the updated CODE-H

SHM’s Coding Optimally by Documenting Effectively for Hospitalists (CODE-H) has launched an updated program with all new content. It will now include eight recorded webinar sessions presented by expert faculty, downloadable resources, and an interactive discussion forum through the Hospital Medicine Exchange (HMX), enabling participants to ask questions and learn the most relevant best practices.

Following each webinar, learners will have the opportunity to complete an evaluation to redeem continuing medical education credits.

Webinars in the series include:
 

  • E/M Basics Part I
  • E/M Basics Part II
  • Utilizing Other Providers in Your Practice
  • EMR and Mitigating Risk
  • Putting Time into Critical Care Documentation
  • Time Based Services
  • Navigating the Rules for Hospitalist Visits
  • Challenges of Concurrent Care

To purchase CODE-H, visit hospitalmedicine.org/CODEH. If you have questions about the new program, please contact [email protected].
 

Set yourself apart as a Fellow in Hospital Medicine

The Fellow in Hospital Medicine (FHM) designation signals your commitment to the hospital medicine specialty and dedication to quality improvement and patient safety. This designation is available for hospital medicine practitioners, including practice administrators, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. If you meet the prerequisites and complete the requirements, which are rooted in the Core Competencies in Hospital Medicine, you can apply for this prestigious designation and join more than 1,100 FHMs who are dedicated to the field of hospital medicine. Learn more and apply at hospitalmedicine.org/fellow.

 

 

New guide & modules on multimodal pain strategies for postoperative pain management

Pain management can pose multiple challenges in the acute care setting for hospitalists and front-line prescribers. While their first priority is to optimally manage pain in their patients, they also face the challenges of treating diverse patient populations, managing patient expectations, and considering how pain control and perceptions affect Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores. Furthermore, because of the ongoing opioid epidemic, prescribers must ensure that pain is managed responsibly and ethically.

To address these issues, SHM developed a guide to address how to work in an interdisciplinary team, identify impediments to implementation, and provide examples of appropriate pain management. In accompaniment with this Multimodal Pain Strategies Guide for Postoperative Pain Management, there are three modules presented by the authors which supplement the electronic guide.

To download the guide or view the modules, visit hospitalmedicine.org/pain.
 

Proven excellence through a unique education style: Academic Hospitalist Academy

Don’t miss the eighth annual Academic Hospitalist Academy (AHA), Sept. 25-28, 2017, at the Lakeway Resort and Spa in Austin, Texas. AHA attendees experience an energizing, interactive learning environment featuring didactics, small-group exercise and skill-building breakout sessions. Each full day of learning is facilitated by leading clinician-educators, hospitalist researchers, and clinical administrators in a 1 to 10 faculty to student ratio.

The Principal Goals of the Academy are to:

  • Develop junior academic hospitalists as the premier teachers and educational leaders at their institutions
  • Help academic hospitalists develop scholarly work and increase scholarly output
  • Enhance awareness of the value of quality improvement and patient safety work
  • Support academic promotion of all attendees

Don’t miss out on this unique, hands-on experience. Register before July 18, 2017, to receive the early-bird rates. Visit academichospitalist.org to learn more.
 

Choosing Wisely Case Study compendium now available

The Choosing Wisely Case Study Competition, hosted by SHM, sought submissions from hospitalists on innovative improvement initiatives implemented in their respective institutions. These initiatives reflect and promote movement toward reducing unnecessary medical tests and procedures and changing a culture that dictates, “More care is better care.”

Submissions were judged by the Choosing Wisely Subcommittee, a panel of SHM members, under adult and pediatric categories. One grand prize winner and three honorable mentions were selected from these categories. The compendium includes these case studies along with additional exemplary submissions.

View the Choosing Wisely Case Study Compendium at hospitalmedicine.org/choosingwisely.
 

Strengthen your interactions with the 5 Rs of Cultural Humility

Look inside this issue for your 5 Rs of Cultural Humility pocket card. It can be easily referenced on rounds and shared with colleagues. We hope to achieve heightened awareness of effective interactions. In addition to the definitions of each of the Rs, the card features questions to ask yourself before, during, and after every interaction to aid in attaining cultural humility.

For more information, visit hospitalmedicine.org/5Rs.

Brett Radler is communications specialist at the Society of Hospital Medicine.

 

HM17 On Demand now available

Couldn’t make it to Las Vegas for SHM’s annual meeting, Hospital Medicine 2017? HM17 On Demand gives you access to over 80 online audio and slide recordings from the hottest tracks, including clinical updates, rapid fire, pediatrics, comanagement, quality, and high-value care.

Additionally, you can earn up to 70 American Medical Association Physician Recognition Award Category 1 Credit(s) and up to 30 American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification credits. HM17 attendees can also benefit by earning additional credits on the sessions you missed out on.

To easily access content through SHM’s Learning Portal, visit shmlearningportal.org/hm17-demand to learn more.
 

Chapter Excellence Awards

SHM is proud to recognize outstanding chapters for the fourth annual Chapter Excellence Awards. Each year, chapters strive to demonstrate growth, sustenance, and innovation within their chapter activities.

View more at www.hospitalmedicine.org/chapterexcellence. Please join SHM in congratulating the following chapters on their success!

Silver Chapters

Boston Association of Academic Hospital Medicine (BAAHM)

Charlotte Metro Area

Houston

Kentucky

Los Angeles

Minnesota

North Jersey

Pacific Northwest

Philadelphia Tri-State

Rocky Mountain

San Francisco Bay

South Central PA

Gold Chapters

New Mexico

Wiregrass

Platinum Chapters

IowaMaryland

Michigan

NYC/Westchester

St. Louis

Outstanding Chapter of the Year

Michigan

Rising Star Chapter

Wiregrass
 

Student Hospitalist Scholar grant winners

SHM’s Student Hospitalist Scholar Grant provides funds with which medical students can conduct mentored scholarly projects related to quality improvement and patient safety in the field of hospital medicine. The program offers a summer and a longitudinal option.

Congratulations to the 2017-2018 Student Hospitalist Scholar Grant recipients:Summer Program

Anton Garazha

Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science

“Effectiveness of Communication During ICU to Ward Transfer and Association with Medical ICU Readmission”

Cole Hirschfeld

Weill Cornell Medical College

“The Role of Diagnostic Bone Biopsies in the Management of Osteomyelitis”

Farah Hussain

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

“Better Understanding Clinical Deterioration in a Children’s Hospital”

Longitudinal Program

Monisha Bhatia

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine

“Using Electronic Medical Record Phenotypic Data to Predict Discharge Destination”

Victor Ekuta

University of California, San Diego School of Medicine

“Reducing CAUTI with Noninvasive UC Alternatives and Measure-vention”

Yun Li

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth

“Developing and implementing clinical pathway(s) for hospitalized injection drug users due to injection-related infection sequelae”

Learn more about the Student Hospitalist Scholar Grant at hospitalmedicine.org/scholargrant.

SPARK ONE: A tool to teach residents

SPARK ONE is a comprehensive, online self-assessment tool created specifically for hospital medicine professionals. The activity contains 450+ vignette-style multiple-choice questions covering 100% of the American Board of Internal Medicine’s Focused Practice in Hospital Medicine (FPHM) exam blueprint. This online tool can be utilized as a training mechanism for resident education on hospital medicine.

SHM Trending News and Notes

As a benefit of SHM membership, residents will receive a free subscription. SPARK ONE provides in-depth review of the following content areas:

  • Cardiology
  • Pulmonary Disease and Critical Care Medicine
  • Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Nephrology and Urology
  • Endocrinology
  • Hematology and Oncology
  • Neurology
  • Allergy, Immunology, Dermatology, Rheumatology and Transitions in Care
  • Palliative Care, Medical Ethics and Decision-making
  • Perioperative Medicine and Consultative Co-management
  • Patient Safety
  • Quality, Cost and Clinical Reasoning

“SPARK ONE provides a unique platform for academic institutions, engaging learners in directed learning sessions, reinforcing teaching points as we encounter specific conditions.” – Rachel E. Thompson, MD, MPH, SFHM

Visit hospitalmedicine.org/sparkone to learn more.
 

Sharpen your coding with the updated CODE-H

SHM’s Coding Optimally by Documenting Effectively for Hospitalists (CODE-H) has launched an updated program with all new content. It will now include eight recorded webinar sessions presented by expert faculty, downloadable resources, and an interactive discussion forum through the Hospital Medicine Exchange (HMX), enabling participants to ask questions and learn the most relevant best practices.

Following each webinar, learners will have the opportunity to complete an evaluation to redeem continuing medical education credits.

Webinars in the series include:
 

  • E/M Basics Part I
  • E/M Basics Part II
  • Utilizing Other Providers in Your Practice
  • EMR and Mitigating Risk
  • Putting Time into Critical Care Documentation
  • Time Based Services
  • Navigating the Rules for Hospitalist Visits
  • Challenges of Concurrent Care

To purchase CODE-H, visit hospitalmedicine.org/CODEH. If you have questions about the new program, please contact [email protected].
 

Set yourself apart as a Fellow in Hospital Medicine

The Fellow in Hospital Medicine (FHM) designation signals your commitment to the hospital medicine specialty and dedication to quality improvement and patient safety. This designation is available for hospital medicine practitioners, including practice administrators, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. If you meet the prerequisites and complete the requirements, which are rooted in the Core Competencies in Hospital Medicine, you can apply for this prestigious designation and join more than 1,100 FHMs who are dedicated to the field of hospital medicine. Learn more and apply at hospitalmedicine.org/fellow.

 

 

New guide & modules on multimodal pain strategies for postoperative pain management

Pain management can pose multiple challenges in the acute care setting for hospitalists and front-line prescribers. While their first priority is to optimally manage pain in their patients, they also face the challenges of treating diverse patient populations, managing patient expectations, and considering how pain control and perceptions affect Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores. Furthermore, because of the ongoing opioid epidemic, prescribers must ensure that pain is managed responsibly and ethically.

To address these issues, SHM developed a guide to address how to work in an interdisciplinary team, identify impediments to implementation, and provide examples of appropriate pain management. In accompaniment with this Multimodal Pain Strategies Guide for Postoperative Pain Management, there are three modules presented by the authors which supplement the electronic guide.

To download the guide or view the modules, visit hospitalmedicine.org/pain.
 

Proven excellence through a unique education style: Academic Hospitalist Academy

Don’t miss the eighth annual Academic Hospitalist Academy (AHA), Sept. 25-28, 2017, at the Lakeway Resort and Spa in Austin, Texas. AHA attendees experience an energizing, interactive learning environment featuring didactics, small-group exercise and skill-building breakout sessions. Each full day of learning is facilitated by leading clinician-educators, hospitalist researchers, and clinical administrators in a 1 to 10 faculty to student ratio.

The Principal Goals of the Academy are to:

  • Develop junior academic hospitalists as the premier teachers and educational leaders at their institutions
  • Help academic hospitalists develop scholarly work and increase scholarly output
  • Enhance awareness of the value of quality improvement and patient safety work
  • Support academic promotion of all attendees

Don’t miss out on this unique, hands-on experience. Register before July 18, 2017, to receive the early-bird rates. Visit academichospitalist.org to learn more.
 

Choosing Wisely Case Study compendium now available

The Choosing Wisely Case Study Competition, hosted by SHM, sought submissions from hospitalists on innovative improvement initiatives implemented in their respective institutions. These initiatives reflect and promote movement toward reducing unnecessary medical tests and procedures and changing a culture that dictates, “More care is better care.”

Submissions were judged by the Choosing Wisely Subcommittee, a panel of SHM members, under adult and pediatric categories. One grand prize winner and three honorable mentions were selected from these categories. The compendium includes these case studies along with additional exemplary submissions.

View the Choosing Wisely Case Study Compendium at hospitalmedicine.org/choosingwisely.
 

Strengthen your interactions with the 5 Rs of Cultural Humility

Look inside this issue for your 5 Rs of Cultural Humility pocket card. It can be easily referenced on rounds and shared with colleagues. We hope to achieve heightened awareness of effective interactions. In addition to the definitions of each of the Rs, the card features questions to ask yourself before, during, and after every interaction to aid in attaining cultural humility.

For more information, visit hospitalmedicine.org/5Rs.

Brett Radler is communications specialist at the Society of Hospital Medicine.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME