The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that umbilical cord clamping be delayed for at least 30-60 seconds after birth in vigorous preterm and term infants.

Since early studies suggested that up to 90% of the blood transfer from the placenta to the newborn after birth happens with an infant’s first few breaths, it has become common practice to clamp the cord within 15-20 seconds after birth.

In 2012, the ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice recommended use of delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants, but found a lack of evidence in term infants. “However, more recent randomized controlled trials of term and preterm infants as well as physiologic studies of blood volume, oxygenation, and arterial pressure have evaluated the effects of immediate versus delayed umbilical cord clamping (usually defined as cord clamping at least 30-60 seconds after birth),” wrote the members of the College’s Committee on Obstetric Practice in an updated opinion released on Dec. 21.

These studies showed that around 80 mL of blood is transferred from the placenta within 1 minute of birth, which appears to be facilitated by the newborn’s initial breaths. This initial transfer of blood supplies significant quantities of iron – 40-50 mg/kg of body weight - and is associated with a lower risk of iron deficiency during the first year of life (Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e5-10).

The committee cited a 2012 systematic review of the data on preterm infants that found a 39% reduction in the number of infants requiring transfusion for anemia when delayed umbilical cord clamping – defined as a delay of 30-180 seconds – was used, compared with immediate clamping. The review also noted a 41% reduction in the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage and 38% reduction in necrotizing enterocolitis, compared with immediate umbilical cord clamping.

Similarly in term infants, those who had their umbilical cord clamped early showed significantly lower hemoglobin concentrations at birth and were more likely to have iron deficiency at 3-6 months of age, compared with term infants who had delayed clamping.

The committee did note that preterm infants who experienced delayed cord clamping showed higher peak bilirubin levels, compared with early clamping. In term infants, delayed cord clamping was associated with a small increase in the incidence of jaundice requiring phototherapy, although there were no significant differences in the rates of polycythemia or jaundice overall.

“Consequently, obstetrician-gynecologists and other obstetric care providers adopting delayed cord clamping in term infants should ensure that mechanisms are in place to monitor for and treat neonatal jaundice,” the committee members wrote.

With regards to maternal outcomes, there had been concerns that delayed umbilical cord clamping could increase the risk of maternal hemorrhage. But a review of five trials including more than 2,200 women found no sign of an increase in adverse events such as postpartum hemorrhage, increased blood loss at delivery, blood transfusions, or reduced postpartum hemoglobin levels.

“However, when there is increased risk of hemorrhage (e.g., placenta previa or placental abruption), the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping need to be balanced with the need for timely hemodynamic stabilization of the woman,” the authors wrote.

The committee found that skin-to-skin care could still take place with delayed umbilical cord clamping, as gravity was not necessary to facilitate the flow of blood from the placenta to the newborn. They also advised that early care of the newborn could still be carried out, including drying and stimulating for the first breath.

Delayed umbilical cord clamping should also not interfere with active management of the third stage of labor, including the use of uterotonic agents after delivery.

The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that umbilical cord clamping be delayed for at least 30-60 seconds after birth in vigorous preterm and term infants.

Since early studies suggested that up to 90% of the blood transfer from the placenta to the newborn after birth happens with an infant’s first few breaths, it has become common practice to clamp the cord within 15-20 seconds after birth.

In 2012, the ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice recommended use of delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants, but found a lack of evidence in term infants. “However, more recent randomized controlled trials of term and preterm infants as well as physiologic studies of blood volume, oxygenation, and arterial pressure have evaluated the effects of immediate versus delayed umbilical cord clamping (usually defined as cord clamping at least 30-60 seconds after birth),” wrote the members of the College’s Committee on Obstetric Practice in an updated opinion released on Dec. 21.

These studies showed that around 80 mL of blood is transferred from the placenta within 1 minute of birth, which appears to be facilitated by the newborn’s initial breaths. This initial transfer of blood supplies significant quantities of iron – 40-50 mg/kg of body weight - and is associated with a lower risk of iron deficiency during the first year of life (Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e5-10).

The committee cited a 2012 systematic review of the data on preterm infants that found a 39% reduction in the number of infants requiring transfusion for anemia when delayed umbilical cord clamping – defined as a delay of 30-180 seconds – was used, compared with immediate clamping. The review also noted a 41% reduction in the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage and 38% reduction in necrotizing enterocolitis, compared with immediate umbilical cord clamping.

Similarly in term infants, those who had their umbilical cord clamped early showed significantly lower hemoglobin concentrations at birth and were more likely to have iron deficiency at 3-6 months of age, compared with term infants who had delayed clamping.

The committee did note that preterm infants who experienced delayed cord clamping showed higher peak bilirubin levels, compared with early clamping. In term infants, delayed cord clamping was associated with a small increase in the incidence of jaundice requiring phototherapy, although there were no significant differences in the rates of polycythemia or jaundice overall.

“Consequently, obstetrician-gynecologists and other obstetric care providers adopting delayed cord clamping in term infants should ensure that mechanisms are in place to monitor for and treat neonatal jaundice,” the committee members wrote.

With regards to maternal outcomes, there had been concerns that delayed umbilical cord clamping could increase the risk of maternal hemorrhage. But a review of five trials including more than 2,200 women found no sign of an increase in adverse events such as postpartum hemorrhage, increased blood loss at delivery, blood transfusions, or reduced postpartum hemoglobin levels.

“However, when there is increased risk of hemorrhage (e.g., placenta previa or placental abruption), the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping need to be balanced with the need for timely hemodynamic stabilization of the woman,” the authors wrote.

The committee found that skin-to-skin care could still take place with delayed umbilical cord clamping, as gravity was not necessary to facilitate the flow of blood from the placenta to the newborn. They also advised that early care of the newborn could still be carried out, including drying and stimulating for the first breath.

Delayed umbilical cord clamping should also not interfere with active management of the third stage of labor, including the use of uterotonic agents after delivery.

The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that umbilical cord clamping be delayed for at least 30-60 seconds after birth in vigorous preterm and term infants.

Since early studies suggested that up to 90% of the blood transfer from the placenta to the newborn after birth happens with an infant’s first few breaths, it has become common practice to clamp the cord within 15-20 seconds after birth.

In 2012, the ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice recommended use of delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants, but found a lack of evidence in term infants. “However, more recent randomized controlled trials of term and preterm infants as well as physiologic studies of blood volume, oxygenation, and arterial pressure have evaluated the effects of immediate versus delayed umbilical cord clamping (usually defined as cord clamping at least 30-60 seconds after birth),” wrote the members of the College’s Committee on Obstetric Practice in an updated opinion released on Dec. 21.

These studies showed that around 80 mL of blood is transferred from the placenta within 1 minute of birth, which appears to be facilitated by the newborn’s initial breaths. This initial transfer of blood supplies significant quantities of iron – 40-50 mg/kg of body weight - and is associated with a lower risk of iron deficiency during the first year of life (Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e5-10).

The committee cited a 2012 systematic review of the data on preterm infants that found a 39% reduction in the number of infants requiring transfusion for anemia when delayed umbilical cord clamping – defined as a delay of 30-180 seconds – was used, compared with immediate clamping. The review also noted a 41% reduction in the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage and 38% reduction in necrotizing enterocolitis, compared with immediate umbilical cord clamping.

Similarly in term infants, those who had their umbilical cord clamped early showed significantly lower hemoglobin concentrations at birth and were more likely to have iron deficiency at 3-6 months of age, compared with term infants who had delayed clamping.

The committee did note that preterm infants who experienced delayed cord clamping showed higher peak bilirubin levels, compared with early clamping. In term infants, delayed cord clamping was associated with a small increase in the incidence of jaundice requiring phototherapy, although there were no significant differences in the rates of polycythemia or jaundice overall.

“Consequently, obstetrician-gynecologists and other obstetric care providers adopting delayed cord clamping in term infants should ensure that mechanisms are in place to monitor for and treat neonatal jaundice,” the committee members wrote.

With regards to maternal outcomes, there had been concerns that delayed umbilical cord clamping could increase the risk of maternal hemorrhage. But a review of five trials including more than 2,200 women found no sign of an increase in adverse events such as postpartum hemorrhage, increased blood loss at delivery, blood transfusions, or reduced postpartum hemoglobin levels.

“However, when there is increased risk of hemorrhage (e.g., placenta previa or placental abruption), the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping need to be balanced with the need for timely hemodynamic stabilization of the woman,” the authors wrote.

The committee found that skin-to-skin care could still take place with delayed umbilical cord clamping, as gravity was not necessary to facilitate the flow of blood from the placenta to the newborn. They also advised that early care of the newborn could still be carried out, including drying and stimulating for the first breath.

Delayed umbilical cord clamping should also not interfere with active management of the third stage of labor, including the use of uterotonic agents after delivery.

The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

A shorter duration of antimicrobial therapy for acute otitis media (AOM) in children is associated with higher rates of clinical failure and higher symptom scores but without any associated reduction in the rates of antimicrobial resistance or adverse events.

Alejandro Hoberman, MD, of the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, and his coauthors report the results of a study in which 520 children aged 6-23 months were randomized to either 10 days of amoxicillin-clavulanate therapy, or 5 days of therapy followed by 5 days of placebo.

A shorter duration of antimicrobial therapy for acute otitis media (AOM) in children is associated with higher rates of clinical failure and higher symptom scores but without any associated reduction in the rates of antimicrobial resistance or adverse events.

Alejandro Hoberman, MD, of the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, and his coauthors report the results of a study in which 520 children aged 6-23 months were randomized to either 10 days of amoxicillin-clavulanate therapy, or 5 days of therapy followed by 5 days of placebo.

A shorter duration of antimicrobial therapy for acute otitis media (AOM) in children is associated with higher rates of clinical failure and higher symptom scores but without any associated reduction in the rates of antimicrobial resistance or adverse events.

Alejandro Hoberman, MD, of the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, and his coauthors report the results of a study in which 520 children aged 6-23 months were randomized to either 10 days of amoxicillin-clavulanate therapy, or 5 days of therapy followed by 5 days of placebo.

For ST segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting between 12 and 24 hours from symptom onset but with no signs of clinical instability, coronary revascularization “may be appropriate,” according to a new report. At the same time, for STEMI patients initially treated with fibrinolysis, revascularization was rated as “appropriate therapy” in the setting of suspected failed fibrinolytic therapy or in stable and asymptomatic patients from 3 to 24 hours after fibrinolysis.

Those are two conclusions contained in a revision of the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization published on Dec. 21 (J Am Coll Cardiol. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.034).

“This update provides a reassessment of clinical scenarios that the writing group felt to be affected by significant changes in the medical literature or gaps from prior criteria,” Manesh R. Patel, MD, chief of the division of cardiology and codirector of the Duke Heart Center at Duke University, Durham, N.C., and chair of the seven-member writing committee for the document, said in a prepared statement. “The primary objective of the appropriate use criteria is to provide a framework for the assessment of practice patterns that will hopefully improve physician decision making and ultimately lead to better patient outcomes.”

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

[email protected]

For ST segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting between 12 and 24 hours from symptom onset but with no signs of clinical instability, coronary revascularization “may be appropriate,” according to a new report. At the same time, for STEMI patients initially treated with fibrinolysis, revascularization was rated as “appropriate therapy” in the setting of suspected failed fibrinolytic therapy or in stable and asymptomatic patients from 3 to 24 hours after fibrinolysis.

Those are two conclusions contained in a revision of the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization published on Dec. 21 (J Am Coll Cardiol. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.034).

“This update provides a reassessment of clinical scenarios that the writing group felt to be affected by significant changes in the medical literature or gaps from prior criteria,” Manesh R. Patel, MD, chief of the division of cardiology and codirector of the Duke Heart Center at Duke University, Durham, N.C., and chair of the seven-member writing committee for the document, said in a prepared statement. “The primary objective of the appropriate use criteria is to provide a framework for the assessment of practice patterns that will hopefully improve physician decision making and ultimately lead to better patient outcomes.”

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

[email protected]

For ST segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting between 12 and 24 hours from symptom onset but with no signs of clinical instability, coronary revascularization “may be appropriate,” according to a new report. At the same time, for STEMI patients initially treated with fibrinolysis, revascularization was rated as “appropriate therapy” in the setting of suspected failed fibrinolytic therapy or in stable and asymptomatic patients from 3 to 24 hours after fibrinolysis.

Those are two conclusions contained in a revision of the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization published on Dec. 21 (J Am Coll Cardiol. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.034).

“This update provides a reassessment of clinical scenarios that the writing group felt to be affected by significant changes in the medical literature or gaps from prior criteria,” Manesh R. Patel, MD, chief of the division of cardiology and codirector of the Duke Heart Center at Duke University, Durham, N.C., and chair of the seven-member writing committee for the document, said in a prepared statement. “The primary objective of the appropriate use criteria is to provide a framework for the assessment of practice patterns that will hopefully improve physician decision making and ultimately lead to better patient outcomes.”

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

[email protected]

VIENNA – When the occasional patient on secukinumab for moderate to severe psoriasis fails to achieve a PASI 75 response initially, don’t despair: Continuing treatment with the biologic usually gets them over that bar, Christopher E. Griffiths, MD, reported at the annual congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

A new secondary pooled analysis of four phase III, 52-week, pivotal clinical trials of secukinumab (Cosentyx) indicates that more than three-quarters of initial suboptimal responders will go on to achieve a PASI 75 response. Moreover, more than one-third will have a PASI 90 response by week 16, which is sustained through week 52. And almost one in five slow responders will have a PASI 100 response – clear skin – at week 52, according to Dr. Griffiths, professor of dermatology at the University of Manchester, England.

[email protected]

VIENNA – When the occasional patient on secukinumab for moderate to severe psoriasis fails to achieve a PASI 75 response initially, don’t despair: Continuing treatment with the biologic usually gets them over that bar, Christopher E. Griffiths, MD, reported at the annual congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

A new secondary pooled analysis of four phase III, 52-week, pivotal clinical trials of secukinumab (Cosentyx) indicates that more than three-quarters of initial suboptimal responders will go on to achieve a PASI 75 response. Moreover, more than one-third will have a PASI 90 response by week 16, which is sustained through week 52. And almost one in five slow responders will have a PASI 100 response – clear skin – at week 52, according to Dr. Griffiths, professor of dermatology at the University of Manchester, England.

[email protected]

VIENNA – When the occasional patient on secukinumab for moderate to severe psoriasis fails to achieve a PASI 75 response initially, don’t despair: Continuing treatment with the biologic usually gets them over that bar, Christopher E. Griffiths, MD, reported at the annual congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

A new secondary pooled analysis of four phase III, 52-week, pivotal clinical trials of secukinumab (Cosentyx) indicates that more than three-quarters of initial suboptimal responders will go on to achieve a PASI 75 response. Moreover, more than one-third will have a PASI 90 response by week 16, which is sustained through week 52. And almost one in five slow responders will have a PASI 100 response – clear skin – at week 52, according to Dr. Griffiths, professor of dermatology at the University of Manchester, England.

[email protected]

ORLANDO – Prescribing optimal therapy for a patient with inflammatory bowel disease can be challenging under ordinary circumstances, but add an extra-intestinal manifestation and the complexity grows greater still. Until more evidence-based findings emerge to help guide and individualize systemic or combination therapy, one of the advantages of biologics – their ability to target the intestine – can be a drawback when patients present with other manifestations.

To highlight the challenges and propose management strategies, Corey A. Siegel, MD, presented the case of a 45-year-old man seeking care 8 years after a diagnosis of ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Seven years earlier, after the patient failed 5-aminosalicylic acid medication and prednisone therapy, clinicians prescribed infliximab (Remicade, Janssen) monotherapy. He experienced a “great response,” Dr. Siegel said at the Advances in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases meeting.

The meeting was sponsored by the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation of America.

Dr. Siegel and Dr. Rubin disclosed ties with AbbVie, Janssen, and Takeda. Dr. Sands disclosed ties with AbbVie, Janssen Biotech, and Takeda. Dr. Lichtenstein disclosed ties with AbbVie, Janssen Orthobiotech, and Takeda.

ORLANDO – Prescribing optimal therapy for a patient with inflammatory bowel disease can be challenging under ordinary circumstances, but add an extra-intestinal manifestation and the complexity grows greater still. Until more evidence-based findings emerge to help guide and individualize systemic or combination therapy, one of the advantages of biologics – their ability to target the intestine – can be a drawback when patients present with other manifestations.

To highlight the challenges and propose management strategies, Corey A. Siegel, MD, presented the case of a 45-year-old man seeking care 8 years after a diagnosis of ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Seven years earlier, after the patient failed 5-aminosalicylic acid medication and prednisone therapy, clinicians prescribed infliximab (Remicade, Janssen) monotherapy. He experienced a “great response,” Dr. Siegel said at the Advances in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases meeting.

The meeting was sponsored by the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation of America.

Dr. Siegel and Dr. Rubin disclosed ties with AbbVie, Janssen, and Takeda. Dr. Sands disclosed ties with AbbVie, Janssen Biotech, and Takeda. Dr. Lichtenstein disclosed ties with AbbVie, Janssen Orthobiotech, and Takeda.

ORLANDO – Prescribing optimal therapy for a patient with inflammatory bowel disease can be challenging under ordinary circumstances, but add an extra-intestinal manifestation and the complexity grows greater still. Until more evidence-based findings emerge to help guide and individualize systemic or combination therapy, one of the advantages of biologics – their ability to target the intestine – can be a drawback when patients present with other manifestations.

To highlight the challenges and propose management strategies, Corey A. Siegel, MD, presented the case of a 45-year-old man seeking care 8 years after a diagnosis of ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Seven years earlier, after the patient failed 5-aminosalicylic acid medication and prednisone therapy, clinicians prescribed infliximab (Remicade, Janssen) monotherapy. He experienced a “great response,” Dr. Siegel said at the Advances in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases meeting.

The meeting was sponsored by the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation of America.

Dr. Siegel and Dr. Rubin disclosed ties with AbbVie, Janssen, and Takeda. Dr. Sands disclosed ties with AbbVie, Janssen Biotech, and Takeda. Dr. Lichtenstein disclosed ties with AbbVie, Janssen Orthobiotech, and Takeda.

Most parents hope that their children will be motivated and hard-working at school, but ambitious students usually face very high levels of stress. Ambitious young people typically push themselves very hard and may not spend enough time in play, relaxation, or exploring potential interests. Their time with peers might be more competitive than social or fun. They may become rigidly focused on a goal, paving the way for devastation if they fall short of their own expectations. They may internalize stress and not ask for help if it starts to take a toll on their mental health. But ambition is not incompatible with healthy development and well-being. Pediatricians usually know who the ambitious students in their practice are, and will hear about the stress they may be experiencing. You have the opportunity to offer them (or their parents) some strategies to manage their high stress levels, and build resilience.

Support ambition, but not perfectionism

It can be helpful to acknowledge to young people that they are ambitious, enabling them to acknowledge this fact about themselves. This kind of drive can be an admirable strength when it is part of an emerging identity, a wish to be successful as defined by the patient.

It is more likely to be problematic if it is a product of a parent’s need to have a child perform as they deem best. Second, it is critical to differentiate ambition from perfectionism. While ambition can keep someone focused and motivated in the face of difficulty, perfectionism is a bully that leaves a person feeling perpetually inadequate. Ambition without a specific interest or focus can lead to general perfectionism in a young person, and parents might unwittingly support this by applauding successes or becoming overinvested in this success reflecting onto them. When the pediatrician points out to a patient (and parents) that perfection is neither possible nor desirable, they may respond, “why wouldn’t I want to be perfect?” Remind them that perfectionism is actually the enemy of long-term accomplishment, discouraging risk-taking, reflection, and growth.

Celebrate failure!

The critical difference between an ambitious person who is persistent and determined (and thus equipped to succeed) and the brittle perfectionist is the ability to tolerate failure and setbacks. Point out to your patients that ambition means there will be a lot of setbacks, disappointments, and failures, as they attempt things that are challenging. Indeed, they should embrace each little failure, as that is how real learning and growth happen, especially if they are constantly stretching their goals.

As children or teenagers learn that failure is evidence that they are on track, working hard, and improving, they will develop tenacity and flexibility. Carol S. Dweck, PhD, a psychologist who has studied school performance in young people, has demonstrated that when young people are praised for their results they tend to give up when they fail, whereas if they are praised for their hard work and persistence, they redouble their effort when they fail. Parents, teachers, and pediatricians have the power to shift an ambitious child’s mindset (Dweck’s term) by helping the child change his or her thinking about what failure really means.

Cultivate self-awareness and perspective

It is one of the central tasks of growing up to learn what one’s interests, talents, and values are, and this self-knowledge is especially critical in ambitious young people. Without genuine interests or passions, ambition may feel like a hollow quest for approval. It is more likely to become general perfectionism. So children and teenagers need adults who are curious about their underlying interests, who patiently help them to cultivate these interests and dedicate their ambition to the pursuit of these passions. Younger children need adult time and support to explore a variety of interests, dabbling so they might figure out where their interests and talents converge. This can provide plenty of opportunity to celebrate effort over achievement. By adolescence, they should have a clearer sense of their personal interests and abilities, and will be deepening their efforts in fewer areas. Adolescence is also when they start to build a narrative of who they are and what values are truly their own. Parents can serve as models and facilitators for their teenagers’ emerging sets of values. Values such as honesty, compassion, or generosity (for example) organize one’s efforts, giving them deeper meaning and keeping difficulties in perspective. Values also will help ambitious young people set their own goals and create an individualized and meaningful definition of success, and keep bigger failures, losses, or disappointments in perspective.

Teach self-care

It seems obvious to state that learning how to care for one’s self is essential to well-being, but for ambitious young people (and adults), self-care is often the first thing to go (or the last thing they consider) in their busy days. Explain to your patients (and parents) that without adequate, consistent, restful sleep, all of their hard work will be inefficient or likely squandered. Explain that daily cardiovascular exercise is not frivolous, but rather essential to balance their cognitive efforts, and offers potent protection for their physical and mental health. There is even robust evidence that sleep and exercise are directly helpful to memory, learning, and creativity. When a parent models this kind of self-care, it is far more powerful than simply talking about it!

Relaxation is self-care!

While most teenagers do not need to be taught how to relax, those very ambitious ones are likely to need permission and even help in learning how to effectively and efficiently blow off steam. Help them to approach relaxation as they would approach a new subject, open-minded and trying different things to determine what works for them. Some may find exercise relaxing, while some may need a cognitive distraction (sometimes called “senseless fun,” an activity not dedicated to achievement) such as reading, family games, or television. Social time often is very effective relaxation for teenagers, and they should know that it is as important as sleep and studying for their performance. Some may find that a calming activity such as yoga or meditation recharges their batteries, whereas others may need noisy video games to feel renewed. Suggest that they should protect (just a little) time for relaxation even on their busiest days to help them develop good habits of self-care. Without consistent, reliable relaxation, ambitious young people are at risk for burnout or for impulsive and extreme behaviors such as binge-drinking.

Be on the lookout for red flags

In the same way that high performing athletes are at risk for stress fractures or other injuries of repetitive, intense physical activity, ambitious students are vulnerable to some of the problems that can follow sustained, intense cognitive effort. These risks go up if they are sleep deprived, stop exercising, or are socially isolated. Parents can be on the lookout for signs of depression or anxiety disorders, such as loss of energy, withdrawal from friends or beloved activities, persistent unhappiness or irritability (sustained over days to weeks), and of course morbid preoccupations.

Intense perfectionism is common among young people at risk for eating disorders, depression and self-injury, and anxiety disorders. Beyond recognizing signs, it is even more important for parents and pediatricians to equip ambitious young people to stay connected and ask for help if they experience a change in their emotional equilibrium. Suggest to your patients that they should never worry alone. They should ask for help if they are struggling to sleep, to sustain their motivation or effort, or notice feeling panicked, unusually tearful, or hopeless. Depression and anxiety are common and treatable problems in adolescents, but ambitious adolescents might be inclined to try to soldier through them. Caring adults should demystify and destigmatize mood and anxiety problems. You might point out that they would ask for help for a toothache or a painful knee joint, and that their mental health should be no different.

Many ambitious children have ambitious parents who might look back on their own adolescence and wonder if they were sufficiently balanced in their approach or whether they overreacted to failure. Sometimes honest sharing of successes, failures, and enduring dilemmas can build an empathic bridge from one generation to the next.
 

Dr. Swick is an attending psychiatrist in the division of child psychiatry at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and director of the Parenting at a Challenging Time (PACT) Program at the Vernon Cancer Center at Newton Wellesley Hospital, also in Boston. Dr. Jellinek is professor emeritus of psychiatry and pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Email them at [email protected].

Most parents hope that their children will be motivated and hard-working at school, but ambitious students usually face very high levels of stress. Ambitious young people typically push themselves very hard and may not spend enough time in play, relaxation, or exploring potential interests. Their time with peers might be more competitive than social or fun. They may become rigidly focused on a goal, paving the way for devastation if they fall short of their own expectations. They may internalize stress and not ask for help if it starts to take a toll on their mental health. But ambition is not incompatible with healthy development and well-being. Pediatricians usually know who the ambitious students in their practice are, and will hear about the stress they may be experiencing. You have the opportunity to offer them (or their parents) some strategies to manage their high stress levels, and build resilience.

Support ambition, but not perfectionism

It can be helpful to acknowledge to young people that they are ambitious, enabling them to acknowledge this fact about themselves. This kind of drive can be an admirable strength when it is part of an emerging identity, a wish to be successful as defined by the patient.

It is more likely to be problematic if it is a product of a parent’s need to have a child perform as they deem best. Second, it is critical to differentiate ambition from perfectionism. While ambition can keep someone focused and motivated in the face of difficulty, perfectionism is a bully that leaves a person feeling perpetually inadequate. Ambition without a specific interest or focus can lead to general perfectionism in a young person, and parents might unwittingly support this by applauding successes or becoming overinvested in this success reflecting onto them. When the pediatrician points out to a patient (and parents) that perfection is neither possible nor desirable, they may respond, “why wouldn’t I want to be perfect?” Remind them that perfectionism is actually the enemy of long-term accomplishment, discouraging risk-taking, reflection, and growth.

Celebrate failure!

The critical difference between an ambitious person who is persistent and determined (and thus equipped to succeed) and the brittle perfectionist is the ability to tolerate failure and setbacks. Point out to your patients that ambition means there will be a lot of setbacks, disappointments, and failures, as they attempt things that are challenging. Indeed, they should embrace each little failure, as that is how real learning and growth happen, especially if they are constantly stretching their goals.

As children or teenagers learn that failure is evidence that they are on track, working hard, and improving, they will develop tenacity and flexibility. Carol S. Dweck, PhD, a psychologist who has studied school performance in young people, has demonstrated that when young people are praised for their results they tend to give up when they fail, whereas if they are praised for their hard work and persistence, they redouble their effort when they fail. Parents, teachers, and pediatricians have the power to shift an ambitious child’s mindset (Dweck’s term) by helping the child change his or her thinking about what failure really means.

Cultivate self-awareness and perspective

It is one of the central tasks of growing up to learn what one’s interests, talents, and values are, and this self-knowledge is especially critical in ambitious young people. Without genuine interests or passions, ambition may feel like a hollow quest for approval. It is more likely to become general perfectionism. So children and teenagers need adults who are curious about their underlying interests, who patiently help them to cultivate these interests and dedicate their ambition to the pursuit of these passions. Younger children need adult time and support to explore a variety of interests, dabbling so they might figure out where their interests and talents converge. This can provide plenty of opportunity to celebrate effort over achievement. By adolescence, they should have a clearer sense of their personal interests and abilities, and will be deepening their efforts in fewer areas. Adolescence is also when they start to build a narrative of who they are and what values are truly their own. Parents can serve as models and facilitators for their teenagers’ emerging sets of values. Values such as honesty, compassion, or generosity (for example) organize one’s efforts, giving them deeper meaning and keeping difficulties in perspective. Values also will help ambitious young people set their own goals and create an individualized and meaningful definition of success, and keep bigger failures, losses, or disappointments in perspective.

Teach self-care

It seems obvious to state that learning how to care for one’s self is essential to well-being, but for ambitious young people (and adults), self-care is often the first thing to go (or the last thing they consider) in their busy days. Explain to your patients (and parents) that without adequate, consistent, restful sleep, all of their hard work will be inefficient or likely squandered. Explain that daily cardiovascular exercise is not frivolous, but rather essential to balance their cognitive efforts, and offers potent protection for their physical and mental health. There is even robust evidence that sleep and exercise are directly helpful to memory, learning, and creativity. When a parent models this kind of self-care, it is far more powerful than simply talking about it!

Relaxation is self-care!

While most teenagers do not need to be taught how to relax, those very ambitious ones are likely to need permission and even help in learning how to effectively and efficiently blow off steam. Help them to approach relaxation as they would approach a new subject, open-minded and trying different things to determine what works for them. Some may find exercise relaxing, while some may need a cognitive distraction (sometimes called “senseless fun,” an activity not dedicated to achievement) such as reading, family games, or television. Social time often is very effective relaxation for teenagers, and they should know that it is as important as sleep and studying for their performance. Some may find that a calming activity such as yoga or meditation recharges their batteries, whereas others may need noisy video games to feel renewed. Suggest that they should protect (just a little) time for relaxation even on their busiest days to help them develop good habits of self-care. Without consistent, reliable relaxation, ambitious young people are at risk for burnout or for impulsive and extreme behaviors such as binge-drinking.

Be on the lookout for red flags

In the same way that high performing athletes are at risk for stress fractures or other injuries of repetitive, intense physical activity, ambitious students are vulnerable to some of the problems that can follow sustained, intense cognitive effort. These risks go up if they are sleep deprived, stop exercising, or are socially isolated. Parents can be on the lookout for signs of depression or anxiety disorders, such as loss of energy, withdrawal from friends or beloved activities, persistent unhappiness or irritability (sustained over days to weeks), and of course morbid preoccupations.

Intense perfectionism is common among young people at risk for eating disorders, depression and self-injury, and anxiety disorders. Beyond recognizing signs, it is even more important for parents and pediatricians to equip ambitious young people to stay connected and ask for help if they experience a change in their emotional equilibrium. Suggest to your patients that they should never worry alone. They should ask for help if they are struggling to sleep, to sustain their motivation or effort, or notice feeling panicked, unusually tearful, or hopeless. Depression and anxiety are common and treatable problems in adolescents, but ambitious adolescents might be inclined to try to soldier through them. Caring adults should demystify and destigmatize mood and anxiety problems. You might point out that they would ask for help for a toothache or a painful knee joint, and that their mental health should be no different.

Many ambitious children have ambitious parents who might look back on their own adolescence and wonder if they were sufficiently balanced in their approach or whether they overreacted to failure. Sometimes honest sharing of successes, failures, and enduring dilemmas can build an empathic bridge from one generation to the next.
 

Dr. Swick is an attending psychiatrist in the division of child psychiatry at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and director of the Parenting at a Challenging Time (PACT) Program at the Vernon Cancer Center at Newton Wellesley Hospital, also in Boston. Dr. Jellinek is professor emeritus of psychiatry and pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Email them at [email protected].

Most parents hope that their children will be motivated and hard-working at school, but ambitious students usually face very high levels of stress. Ambitious young people typically push themselves very hard and may not spend enough time in play, relaxation, or exploring potential interests. Their time with peers might be more competitive than social or fun. They may become rigidly focused on a goal, paving the way for devastation if they fall short of their own expectations. They may internalize stress and not ask for help if it starts to take a toll on their mental health. But ambition is not incompatible with healthy development and well-being. Pediatricians usually know who the ambitious students in their practice are, and will hear about the stress they may be experiencing. You have the opportunity to offer them (or their parents) some strategies to manage their high stress levels, and build resilience.

Support ambition, but not perfectionism

It can be helpful to acknowledge to young people that they are ambitious, enabling them to acknowledge this fact about themselves. This kind of drive can be an admirable strength when it is part of an emerging identity, a wish to be successful as defined by the patient.

It is more likely to be problematic if it is a product of a parent’s need to have a child perform as they deem best. Second, it is critical to differentiate ambition from perfectionism. While ambition can keep someone focused and motivated in the face of difficulty, perfectionism is a bully that leaves a person feeling perpetually inadequate. Ambition without a specific interest or focus can lead to general perfectionism in a young person, and parents might unwittingly support this by applauding successes or becoming overinvested in this success reflecting onto them. When the pediatrician points out to a patient (and parents) that perfection is neither possible nor desirable, they may respond, “why wouldn’t I want to be perfect?” Remind them that perfectionism is actually the enemy of long-term accomplishment, discouraging risk-taking, reflection, and growth.

Celebrate failure!

The critical difference between an ambitious person who is persistent and determined (and thus equipped to succeed) and the brittle perfectionist is the ability to tolerate failure and setbacks. Point out to your patients that ambition means there will be a lot of setbacks, disappointments, and failures, as they attempt things that are challenging. Indeed, they should embrace each little failure, as that is how real learning and growth happen, especially if they are constantly stretching their goals.

As children or teenagers learn that failure is evidence that they are on track, working hard, and improving, they will develop tenacity and flexibility. Carol S. Dweck, PhD, a psychologist who has studied school performance in young people, has demonstrated that when young people are praised for their results they tend to give up when they fail, whereas if they are praised for their hard work and persistence, they redouble their effort when they fail. Parents, teachers, and pediatricians have the power to shift an ambitious child’s mindset (Dweck’s term) by helping the child change his or her thinking about what failure really means.

Cultivate self-awareness and perspective

It is one of the central tasks of growing up to learn what one’s interests, talents, and values are, and this self-knowledge is especially critical in ambitious young people. Without genuine interests or passions, ambition may feel like a hollow quest for approval. It is more likely to become general perfectionism. So children and teenagers need adults who are curious about their underlying interests, who patiently help them to cultivate these interests and dedicate their ambition to the pursuit of these passions. Younger children need adult time and support to explore a variety of interests, dabbling so they might figure out where their interests and talents converge. This can provide plenty of opportunity to celebrate effort over achievement. By adolescence, they should have a clearer sense of their personal interests and abilities, and will be deepening their efforts in fewer areas. Adolescence is also when they start to build a narrative of who they are and what values are truly their own. Parents can serve as models and facilitators for their teenagers’ emerging sets of values. Values such as honesty, compassion, or generosity (for example) organize one’s efforts, giving them deeper meaning and keeping difficulties in perspective. Values also will help ambitious young people set their own goals and create an individualized and meaningful definition of success, and keep bigger failures, losses, or disappointments in perspective.

Teach self-care

It seems obvious to state that learning how to care for one’s self is essential to well-being, but for ambitious young people (and adults), self-care is often the first thing to go (or the last thing they consider) in their busy days. Explain to your patients (and parents) that without adequate, consistent, restful sleep, all of their hard work will be inefficient or likely squandered. Explain that daily cardiovascular exercise is not frivolous, but rather essential to balance their cognitive efforts, and offers potent protection for their physical and mental health. There is even robust evidence that sleep and exercise are directly helpful to memory, learning, and creativity. When a parent models this kind of self-care, it is far more powerful than simply talking about it!

Relaxation is self-care!

While most teenagers do not need to be taught how to relax, those very ambitious ones are likely to need permission and even help in learning how to effectively and efficiently blow off steam. Help them to approach relaxation as they would approach a new subject, open-minded and trying different things to determine what works for them. Some may find exercise relaxing, while some may need a cognitive distraction (sometimes called “senseless fun,” an activity not dedicated to achievement) such as reading, family games, or television. Social time often is very effective relaxation for teenagers, and they should know that it is as important as sleep and studying for their performance. Some may find that a calming activity such as yoga or meditation recharges their batteries, whereas others may need noisy video games to feel renewed. Suggest that they should protect (just a little) time for relaxation even on their busiest days to help them develop good habits of self-care. Without consistent, reliable relaxation, ambitious young people are at risk for burnout or for impulsive and extreme behaviors such as binge-drinking.

Be on the lookout for red flags

In the same way that high performing athletes are at risk for stress fractures or other injuries of repetitive, intense physical activity, ambitious students are vulnerable to some of the problems that can follow sustained, intense cognitive effort. These risks go up if they are sleep deprived, stop exercising, or are socially isolated. Parents can be on the lookout for signs of depression or anxiety disorders, such as loss of energy, withdrawal from friends or beloved activities, persistent unhappiness or irritability (sustained over days to weeks), and of course morbid preoccupations.

Intense perfectionism is common among young people at risk for eating disorders, depression and self-injury, and anxiety disorders. Beyond recognizing signs, it is even more important for parents and pediatricians to equip ambitious young people to stay connected and ask for help if they experience a change in their emotional equilibrium. Suggest to your patients that they should never worry alone. They should ask for help if they are struggling to sleep, to sustain their motivation or effort, or notice feeling panicked, unusually tearful, or hopeless. Depression and anxiety are common and treatable problems in adolescents, but ambitious adolescents might be inclined to try to soldier through them. Caring adults should demystify and destigmatize mood and anxiety problems. You might point out that they would ask for help for a toothache or a painful knee joint, and that their mental health should be no different.

Many ambitious children have ambitious parents who might look back on their own adolescence and wonder if they were sufficiently balanced in their approach or whether they overreacted to failure. Sometimes honest sharing of successes, failures, and enduring dilemmas can build an empathic bridge from one generation to the next.
 

Dr. Swick is an attending psychiatrist in the division of child psychiatry at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and director of the Parenting at a Challenging Time (PACT) Program at the Vernon Cancer Center at Newton Wellesley Hospital, also in Boston. Dr. Jellinek is professor emeritus of psychiatry and pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Email them at [email protected].

This series for primary care physicians covers key topics in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma within the context of current national guidelines and clinical practice.

Click here to read the supplement

Randall Brown, MD, MPH, AE-C
Center for Managing Chronic Disease
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

This series for primary care physicians covers key topics in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma within the context of current national guidelines and clinical practice.

Click here to read the supplement

Randall Brown, MD, MPH, AE-C
Center for Managing Chronic Disease
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

This series for primary care physicians covers key topics in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma within the context of current national guidelines and clinical practice.

Click here to read the supplement

Randall Brown, MD, MPH, AE-C
Center for Managing Chronic Disease
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Women with breast cancer are much less likely to opt for contralateral prophylactic mastectomies if they know it won’t prolong their lives, according to a survey of 2,402 women with unilateral stage 0-II breast cancer.

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) – removing the healthy breast along with the cancerous one – is on the rise for early-stage, unilateral breast cancer because of “celebrity exposure and publicity,” said investigators led by Reshma Jagsi, MD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (JAMA Surg. 2016 Dec 21. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4749).

CPM might make sense for women at genetic risk for breast cancer, like actress Angelina Jolie – who made headlines in 2013 when she opted for double mastectomy – but the survey found that nearly one in five women with no genetic risks also opted for CPM when their surgeons made no recommendation either way.

When surgeons advised against the procedure, the number fell to about 2%. Meanwhile, many women said their surgeons stayed silent on the issue, which is a problem, according to the investigators.

Overall, about 44% of women in the survey considered CPM, but just 38% of them said they knew that CPM didn’t improve survival for all women with breast cancer.

“Some patients may pursue CPM for cosmetic symmetry or other reasons. However, it is not clear that average-risk patients who choose CPM truly understand that it will not improve their survival or alter recurrence risk,” the investigators noted.

Surgeons’ knowledge and communication practices could be targets for quality improvement interventions, the investigators wrote. “Our findings should motivate surgeons to broach these difficult conversations with their patients, to make their recommendations clear, and to promote patients’ peace of mind by emphasizing how other treatments complement surgery to reduce the risk of both tumor recurrence and subsequent cancer development,” they said.

Women in the study were identified through the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries of Los Angeles County and Georgia. They were 62 years old, on average. CPM was associated with younger age, white race, higher educational level, family history, and private insurance.

The National Institutes of Health supported the study. Dr. Jagsi reported having no disclosures. A coauthor reported research funding from Myriad Genetics, Invitae, Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, and Genomic Health.

[email protected]

Women with breast cancer are much less likely to opt for contralateral prophylactic mastectomies if they know it won’t prolong their lives, according to a survey of 2,402 women with unilateral stage 0-II breast cancer.

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) – removing the healthy breast along with the cancerous one – is on the rise for early-stage, unilateral breast cancer because of “celebrity exposure and publicity,” said investigators led by Reshma Jagsi, MD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (JAMA Surg. 2016 Dec 21. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4749).

CPM might make sense for women at genetic risk for breast cancer, like actress Angelina Jolie – who made headlines in 2013 when she opted for double mastectomy – but the survey found that nearly one in five women with no genetic risks also opted for CPM when their surgeons made no recommendation either way.

When surgeons advised against the procedure, the number fell to about 2%. Meanwhile, many women said their surgeons stayed silent on the issue, which is a problem, according to the investigators.

Overall, about 44% of women in the survey considered CPM, but just 38% of them said they knew that CPM didn’t improve survival for all women with breast cancer.

“Some patients may pursue CPM for cosmetic symmetry or other reasons. However, it is not clear that average-risk patients who choose CPM truly understand that it will not improve their survival or alter recurrence risk,” the investigators noted.

Surgeons’ knowledge and communication practices could be targets for quality improvement interventions, the investigators wrote. “Our findings should motivate surgeons to broach these difficult conversations with their patients, to make their recommendations clear, and to promote patients’ peace of mind by emphasizing how other treatments complement surgery to reduce the risk of both tumor recurrence and subsequent cancer development,” they said.

Women in the study were identified through the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries of Los Angeles County and Georgia. They were 62 years old, on average. CPM was associated with younger age, white race, higher educational level, family history, and private insurance.

The National Institutes of Health supported the study. Dr. Jagsi reported having no disclosures. A coauthor reported research funding from Myriad Genetics, Invitae, Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, and Genomic Health.

[email protected]

Women with breast cancer are much less likely to opt for contralateral prophylactic mastectomies if they know it won’t prolong their lives, according to a survey of 2,402 women with unilateral stage 0-II breast cancer.

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) – removing the healthy breast along with the cancerous one – is on the rise for early-stage, unilateral breast cancer because of “celebrity exposure and publicity,” said investigators led by Reshma Jagsi, MD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (JAMA Surg. 2016 Dec 21. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4749).

CPM might make sense for women at genetic risk for breast cancer, like actress Angelina Jolie – who made headlines in 2013 when she opted for double mastectomy – but the survey found that nearly one in five women with no genetic risks also opted for CPM when their surgeons made no recommendation either way.

When surgeons advised against the procedure, the number fell to about 2%. Meanwhile, many women said their surgeons stayed silent on the issue, which is a problem, according to the investigators.

Overall, about 44% of women in the survey considered CPM, but just 38% of them said they knew that CPM didn’t improve survival for all women with breast cancer.

“Some patients may pursue CPM for cosmetic symmetry or other reasons. However, it is not clear that average-risk patients who choose CPM truly understand that it will not improve their survival or alter recurrence risk,” the investigators noted.

Surgeons’ knowledge and communication practices could be targets for quality improvement interventions, the investigators wrote. “Our findings should motivate surgeons to broach these difficult conversations with their patients, to make their recommendations clear, and to promote patients’ peace of mind by emphasizing how other treatments complement surgery to reduce the risk of both tumor recurrence and subsequent cancer development,” they said.

Women in the study were identified through the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries of Los Angeles County and Georgia. They were 62 years old, on average. CPM was associated with younger age, white race, higher educational level, family history, and private insurance.

The National Institutes of Health supported the study. Dr. Jagsi reported having no disclosures. A coauthor reported research funding from Myriad Genetics, Invitae, Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, and Genomic Health.

[email protected]

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has finalized three cardiac payment bundles that will qualify as advanced alternative payment models under MACRA’s Quality Payment Program, but questions linger as to whether the bundles will survive in the Trump administration.

The bundles include the Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) model, the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) model, and the Cardiac Rehabilitation Incentive Payment model. The three programs were proposed in July 2016 and finalized in a rule posted Dec. 20, and scheduled for publication in the Federal Register on Jan. 3, 2017.

The bundled payment model will place accountability for patient outcomes 90 days after discharge on the hospital where treatment occurred. Beginning July 1, 2017, hospitals in 98 randomly selected metropolitan statistical areas will be placed under this model and monitored for 5 years to test whether the model leads to improved outcomes and lower costs.

Physician participation will be voluntary; those who do participate will eligible for bonus payments as part of a Quality Payment Program advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM) when savings are generated, and responsible for penalties when costs exceed targets. Physician participation would begin in 2018.

[email protected]
 

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has finalized three cardiac payment bundles that will qualify as advanced alternative payment models under MACRA’s Quality Payment Program, but questions linger as to whether the bundles will survive in the Trump administration.

The bundles include the Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) model, the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) model, and the Cardiac Rehabilitation Incentive Payment model. The three programs were proposed in July 2016 and finalized in a rule posted Dec. 20, and scheduled for publication in the Federal Register on Jan. 3, 2017.

The bundled payment model will place accountability for patient outcomes 90 days after discharge on the hospital where treatment occurred. Beginning July 1, 2017, hospitals in 98 randomly selected metropolitan statistical areas will be placed under this model and monitored for 5 years to test whether the model leads to improved outcomes and lower costs.

Physician participation will be voluntary; those who do participate will eligible for bonus payments as part of a Quality Payment Program advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM) when savings are generated, and responsible for penalties when costs exceed targets. Physician participation would begin in 2018.

[email protected]
 

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has finalized three cardiac payment bundles that will qualify as advanced alternative payment models under MACRA’s Quality Payment Program, but questions linger as to whether the bundles will survive in the Trump administration.

The bundles include the Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) model, the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) model, and the Cardiac Rehabilitation Incentive Payment model. The three programs were proposed in July 2016 and finalized in a rule posted Dec. 20, and scheduled for publication in the Federal Register on Jan. 3, 2017.

The bundled payment model will place accountability for patient outcomes 90 days after discharge on the hospital where treatment occurred. Beginning July 1, 2017, hospitals in 98 randomly selected metropolitan statistical areas will be placed under this model and monitored for 5 years to test whether the model leads to improved outcomes and lower costs.

Physician participation will be voluntary; those who do participate will eligible for bonus payments as part of a Quality Payment Program advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM) when savings are generated, and responsible for penalties when costs exceed targets. Physician participation would begin in 2018.

[email protected]
 

People with diabetes have come a step closer to a life without multiple daily finger sticks. The approved use of the Dexcom G5 Mobile Continuous Glucose Monitoring System has been expanded to allow for replacement of fingerstick blood glucose testing for diabetes treatment decisions in people 2 years of age and older with diabetes, the Food and Drug Administration announced .

“Although this system still requires calibration with two daily fingersticks, it eliminates the need for any additional fingerstick blood glucose testing in order to make treatment decisions,” Alberto Gutierrez, Ph.D., director of the office of in vitro diagnostics and radiological health in the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said in the FDA statement.

[email protected]

People with diabetes have come a step closer to a life without multiple daily finger sticks. The approved use of the Dexcom G5 Mobile Continuous Glucose Monitoring System has been expanded to allow for replacement of fingerstick blood glucose testing for diabetes treatment decisions in people 2 years of age and older with diabetes, the Food and Drug Administration announced .

“Although this system still requires calibration with two daily fingersticks, it eliminates the need for any additional fingerstick blood glucose testing in order to make treatment decisions,” Alberto Gutierrez, Ph.D., director of the office of in vitro diagnostics and radiological health in the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said in the FDA statement.

[email protected]

People with diabetes have come a step closer to a life without multiple daily finger sticks. The approved use of the Dexcom G5 Mobile Continuous Glucose Monitoring System has been expanded to allow for replacement of fingerstick blood glucose testing for diabetes treatment decisions in people 2 years of age and older with diabetes, the Food and Drug Administration announced .

“Although this system still requires calibration with two daily fingersticks, it eliminates the need for any additional fingerstick blood glucose testing in order to make treatment decisions,” Alberto Gutierrez, Ph.D., director of the office of in vitro diagnostics and radiological health in the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said in the FDA statement.

[email protected]