RRTs in Teaching Hospitals

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/02/2017 - 19:34
Display Headline
Rapid response teams in teaching hospitals: Aligning efforts to improve medical education and quality

In this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine, Butcher and colleagues report on residents' perceptions of a rapid response team's (RRT) impact on their training.[1] RRTs mobilize key clinicians in an attempt to rescue acutely decompensating hospitalized patients. Early recognition is essential, and most systems allow any concerned health professional to activate the RRT. Although the evidence for benefit is somewhat controversial,[2, 3] an overwhelming majority of hospitals have implemented RRTs.[4, 5]

The use of RRTs in teaching hospitals raises important concerns. The ability of nurses and other professionals to activate the RRT without need for prior approval from a physician could potentially undermine resident physician autonomy. Residents may feel that their clinical judgment has been usurped or second guessed. Whether nurse led or physician led, RRTs always introduce new members to the care team.[6] These new team members share in decision making, which may theoretically reduce residents' opportunities to hone their decision‐making skills when caring for potentially critically ill patients.

Despite these potential disadvantages, Butcher and colleagues report that the vast majority of residents found working with the RRT to be a valuable educational experience and disagreed that the RRT decreased their clinical autonomy. Interestingly, surgical residents were less likely to agree that working with the RRT was a valuable educational experience and much more likely to feel that nurses should contact them before activating the RRT.

The results of the study by Butcher et al. highlight several evolving paradigms in medical education and quality improvement. Over the past 10 to 15 years, and fostered in large part by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) duty‐hour revisions,[7] teaching hospitals have moved away from the traditional practice of using residents primarily to fill their clinical service needs to an approach that treats residents more as learners. Resident training requires clinical care, but the provision of clinical care in teaching hospitals does not necessarily require residents. At the same time, healthcare organizations have moved away from the traditional culture characterized by reliance on individual skill, physician autonomy, and steep hierarchies, to an enlightened culture emphasizing teamwork with flattened hierarchies and systems redesigned to provide safe and effective care.[8]

For the most part, the paradigm shifts in medical education and quality improvement have been aligned. In fact, the primary goal of duty‐hour policy revisions was to improve patient safety.[9] Yet, Butcher and colleagues' study highlights the need to continuously and deliberately integrate our efforts to enhance medical education and quality of care, and more rigorously study the effects. Rather than be pleasantly surprised that residents understand the intrinsic value of an RRT to patient care and their education, we should ensure that residents understand the rationale for an RRT and consider using the RRT to complement other efforts to educate resident physicians in managing unstable patients. RRTs introduce a wonderful opportunity to develop novel interprofessional curricula. Learning objectives should include the management of common clinical syndromes represented in RRT calls, but should also focus on communication, leadership, and other essential teamwork skills. Simulation‐based training is an ideal teaching strategy for these objectives, and prior studies support the effectiveness of this approach.[10, 11]

The ACGME has now implemented the Next Accreditation System (NAS) across all specialties. Of the 22 reporting milestones within internal medicine, 12 relate directly to quality improvement and patient safety objectives, whereas 6 relate directly to pathophysiology and disease management.[12] Educating residents on systems of care is further highlighted by the Clinical Learning Environment Review (CLER), a key component of the NAS. The CLER program uses site visits to identify teaching hospitals' efforts to engage residents in 6 focus areas: patient safety; healthcare quality; transitions of care; supervision; duty hours, fatigue management, and mitigation; and professionalism.[13] CLER site visits include discussions and observations with hospital executive leadership, residents, graduate medical education leadership, nursing, and other hospital staff. The CLER program raises the bar for integrating medical education and quality improvement efforts even further. Quality improvement activities that previously supported an informal curriculum must now be made explicit to, and deliberately engage, our residents. Teaching hospitals are being tasked with including residents in safety initiatives and on all quality committees, especially those with cross‐departmental boundaries such as the Emergency Response Team/RRT Committee. Residents should meaningfully participate, and whenever possible, lead quality improvement projects, the focus of which may ideally be identified by residents themselves. An important resource for medical educators is the Quality and Safety Educators Academy, a program developed by the Society of Hospital Medicine and the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, which provides educators with the knowledge and tools to integrate quality improvement and patient safety objectives into their training programs.[14]

In conclusion, we are reassured that residents understand the intrinsic value of an RRT to patient care and their education. We encourage medical educators to use RRTs as an opportunity to develop interprofessional curricula, including those that aim to enhance teamwork skills. Beyond curricular innovation, quality‐improvement activities in teaching hospitals must deliberately engage our residents at every level of the organization.

Disclosure

Disclosure: Nothing to report.

References
  1. Butcher BW, Quist CE, Harrison JD, Ranji SR. The effect of a rapid response team on resident perceptions of education and autonomy. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(1):812.
  2. Chan PS, Jain R, Nallmothu BK, Berg RA, Sasson C. Rapid response teams: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):1826.
  3. Winters BD, Weaver SJ, Pfoh ER, Yang T, Pham JC, Dy SM. Rapid‐response systems as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 pt 2):417425.
  4. Edelson DP, Yuen TC, Mancini ME, et al. Hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation practice in the United States: a nationally representative survey. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(6):353357.
  5. Reason J. Achieving a safe culture: theory and practice. Work Stress. 1998;12(3):293306.
  6. Wood KA, Ranji SR, Ide B, Dracup K. Rapid response systems in adult academic medical centers. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35(9):475482, 437.
  7. Nasca TJ, Day SH, Amis ES. The new recommendations on duty hours from the ACGME Task Force. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(2):e3.
  8. Jones KJ, Skinner A, Xu L, et al. The AHRQ hospital survey on patient safety culture: a tool to plan and evaluate patient safety programs. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, et al., eds. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 2: Culture and Redesign). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43699. Accessed November 4, 2014.
  9. The ACGME 2011 Duty Hour Standards: Enhancing Quality of Care, Supervision, and Resident Professional Development. Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2011.
  10. DeVita MA, Schaefer J, Lutz J, Wang H, Dongilli T. Improving medical emergency team (MET) performance using a novel curriculum and a computerized human patient simulator. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(5):326331.
  11. Wehbe‐Janek H, Pliego J, Sheather S, Villamaria F. System‐based interprofessional simulation‐based training program increases awareness and use of rapid response teams. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014;40(6):279287.
  12. Internal Medicine Milestone Group. The Internal Medicine Milestone Project. A Joint Initiative of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and The American Board of Internal Medicine. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/InternalMedicineMilestones.pdf. Accessed November 4, 2014.
  13. Weiss KB, Bagian JP, Nasca TJ. The clinical learning environment: the foundation of graduate medical education. JAMA. 2013;309(16):16871688.
  14. Myers JS, Tess A, Glasheen JJ, et al. The Quality and Safety Educators Academy: fulfilling an unmet need for faculty development. Am J Med Qual. 2014;29(1):512.
Article PDF
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(1)
Page Number
62-63
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF

In this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine, Butcher and colleagues report on residents' perceptions of a rapid response team's (RRT) impact on their training.[1] RRTs mobilize key clinicians in an attempt to rescue acutely decompensating hospitalized patients. Early recognition is essential, and most systems allow any concerned health professional to activate the RRT. Although the evidence for benefit is somewhat controversial,[2, 3] an overwhelming majority of hospitals have implemented RRTs.[4, 5]

The use of RRTs in teaching hospitals raises important concerns. The ability of nurses and other professionals to activate the RRT without need for prior approval from a physician could potentially undermine resident physician autonomy. Residents may feel that their clinical judgment has been usurped or second guessed. Whether nurse led or physician led, RRTs always introduce new members to the care team.[6] These new team members share in decision making, which may theoretically reduce residents' opportunities to hone their decision‐making skills when caring for potentially critically ill patients.

Despite these potential disadvantages, Butcher and colleagues report that the vast majority of residents found working with the RRT to be a valuable educational experience and disagreed that the RRT decreased their clinical autonomy. Interestingly, surgical residents were less likely to agree that working with the RRT was a valuable educational experience and much more likely to feel that nurses should contact them before activating the RRT.

The results of the study by Butcher et al. highlight several evolving paradigms in medical education and quality improvement. Over the past 10 to 15 years, and fostered in large part by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) duty‐hour revisions,[7] teaching hospitals have moved away from the traditional practice of using residents primarily to fill their clinical service needs to an approach that treats residents more as learners. Resident training requires clinical care, but the provision of clinical care in teaching hospitals does not necessarily require residents. At the same time, healthcare organizations have moved away from the traditional culture characterized by reliance on individual skill, physician autonomy, and steep hierarchies, to an enlightened culture emphasizing teamwork with flattened hierarchies and systems redesigned to provide safe and effective care.[8]

For the most part, the paradigm shifts in medical education and quality improvement have been aligned. In fact, the primary goal of duty‐hour policy revisions was to improve patient safety.[9] Yet, Butcher and colleagues' study highlights the need to continuously and deliberately integrate our efforts to enhance medical education and quality of care, and more rigorously study the effects. Rather than be pleasantly surprised that residents understand the intrinsic value of an RRT to patient care and their education, we should ensure that residents understand the rationale for an RRT and consider using the RRT to complement other efforts to educate resident physicians in managing unstable patients. RRTs introduce a wonderful opportunity to develop novel interprofessional curricula. Learning objectives should include the management of common clinical syndromes represented in RRT calls, but should also focus on communication, leadership, and other essential teamwork skills. Simulation‐based training is an ideal teaching strategy for these objectives, and prior studies support the effectiveness of this approach.[10, 11]

The ACGME has now implemented the Next Accreditation System (NAS) across all specialties. Of the 22 reporting milestones within internal medicine, 12 relate directly to quality improvement and patient safety objectives, whereas 6 relate directly to pathophysiology and disease management.[12] Educating residents on systems of care is further highlighted by the Clinical Learning Environment Review (CLER), a key component of the NAS. The CLER program uses site visits to identify teaching hospitals' efforts to engage residents in 6 focus areas: patient safety; healthcare quality; transitions of care; supervision; duty hours, fatigue management, and mitigation; and professionalism.[13] CLER site visits include discussions and observations with hospital executive leadership, residents, graduate medical education leadership, nursing, and other hospital staff. The CLER program raises the bar for integrating medical education and quality improvement efforts even further. Quality improvement activities that previously supported an informal curriculum must now be made explicit to, and deliberately engage, our residents. Teaching hospitals are being tasked with including residents in safety initiatives and on all quality committees, especially those with cross‐departmental boundaries such as the Emergency Response Team/RRT Committee. Residents should meaningfully participate, and whenever possible, lead quality improvement projects, the focus of which may ideally be identified by residents themselves. An important resource for medical educators is the Quality and Safety Educators Academy, a program developed by the Society of Hospital Medicine and the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, which provides educators with the knowledge and tools to integrate quality improvement and patient safety objectives into their training programs.[14]

In conclusion, we are reassured that residents understand the intrinsic value of an RRT to patient care and their education. We encourage medical educators to use RRTs as an opportunity to develop interprofessional curricula, including those that aim to enhance teamwork skills. Beyond curricular innovation, quality‐improvement activities in teaching hospitals must deliberately engage our residents at every level of the organization.

Disclosure

Disclosure: Nothing to report.

In this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine, Butcher and colleagues report on residents' perceptions of a rapid response team's (RRT) impact on their training.[1] RRTs mobilize key clinicians in an attempt to rescue acutely decompensating hospitalized patients. Early recognition is essential, and most systems allow any concerned health professional to activate the RRT. Although the evidence for benefit is somewhat controversial,[2, 3] an overwhelming majority of hospitals have implemented RRTs.[4, 5]

The use of RRTs in teaching hospitals raises important concerns. The ability of nurses and other professionals to activate the RRT without need for prior approval from a physician could potentially undermine resident physician autonomy. Residents may feel that their clinical judgment has been usurped or second guessed. Whether nurse led or physician led, RRTs always introduce new members to the care team.[6] These new team members share in decision making, which may theoretically reduce residents' opportunities to hone their decision‐making skills when caring for potentially critically ill patients.

Despite these potential disadvantages, Butcher and colleagues report that the vast majority of residents found working with the RRT to be a valuable educational experience and disagreed that the RRT decreased their clinical autonomy. Interestingly, surgical residents were less likely to agree that working with the RRT was a valuable educational experience and much more likely to feel that nurses should contact them before activating the RRT.

The results of the study by Butcher et al. highlight several evolving paradigms in medical education and quality improvement. Over the past 10 to 15 years, and fostered in large part by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) duty‐hour revisions,[7] teaching hospitals have moved away from the traditional practice of using residents primarily to fill their clinical service needs to an approach that treats residents more as learners. Resident training requires clinical care, but the provision of clinical care in teaching hospitals does not necessarily require residents. At the same time, healthcare organizations have moved away from the traditional culture characterized by reliance on individual skill, physician autonomy, and steep hierarchies, to an enlightened culture emphasizing teamwork with flattened hierarchies and systems redesigned to provide safe and effective care.[8]

For the most part, the paradigm shifts in medical education and quality improvement have been aligned. In fact, the primary goal of duty‐hour policy revisions was to improve patient safety.[9] Yet, Butcher and colleagues' study highlights the need to continuously and deliberately integrate our efforts to enhance medical education and quality of care, and more rigorously study the effects. Rather than be pleasantly surprised that residents understand the intrinsic value of an RRT to patient care and their education, we should ensure that residents understand the rationale for an RRT and consider using the RRT to complement other efforts to educate resident physicians in managing unstable patients. RRTs introduce a wonderful opportunity to develop novel interprofessional curricula. Learning objectives should include the management of common clinical syndromes represented in RRT calls, but should also focus on communication, leadership, and other essential teamwork skills. Simulation‐based training is an ideal teaching strategy for these objectives, and prior studies support the effectiveness of this approach.[10, 11]

The ACGME has now implemented the Next Accreditation System (NAS) across all specialties. Of the 22 reporting milestones within internal medicine, 12 relate directly to quality improvement and patient safety objectives, whereas 6 relate directly to pathophysiology and disease management.[12] Educating residents on systems of care is further highlighted by the Clinical Learning Environment Review (CLER), a key component of the NAS. The CLER program uses site visits to identify teaching hospitals' efforts to engage residents in 6 focus areas: patient safety; healthcare quality; transitions of care; supervision; duty hours, fatigue management, and mitigation; and professionalism.[13] CLER site visits include discussions and observations with hospital executive leadership, residents, graduate medical education leadership, nursing, and other hospital staff. The CLER program raises the bar for integrating medical education and quality improvement efforts even further. Quality improvement activities that previously supported an informal curriculum must now be made explicit to, and deliberately engage, our residents. Teaching hospitals are being tasked with including residents in safety initiatives and on all quality committees, especially those with cross‐departmental boundaries such as the Emergency Response Team/RRT Committee. Residents should meaningfully participate, and whenever possible, lead quality improvement projects, the focus of which may ideally be identified by residents themselves. An important resource for medical educators is the Quality and Safety Educators Academy, a program developed by the Society of Hospital Medicine and the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, which provides educators with the knowledge and tools to integrate quality improvement and patient safety objectives into their training programs.[14]

In conclusion, we are reassured that residents understand the intrinsic value of an RRT to patient care and their education. We encourage medical educators to use RRTs as an opportunity to develop interprofessional curricula, including those that aim to enhance teamwork skills. Beyond curricular innovation, quality‐improvement activities in teaching hospitals must deliberately engage our residents at every level of the organization.

Disclosure

Disclosure: Nothing to report.

References
  1. Butcher BW, Quist CE, Harrison JD, Ranji SR. The effect of a rapid response team on resident perceptions of education and autonomy. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(1):812.
  2. Chan PS, Jain R, Nallmothu BK, Berg RA, Sasson C. Rapid response teams: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):1826.
  3. Winters BD, Weaver SJ, Pfoh ER, Yang T, Pham JC, Dy SM. Rapid‐response systems as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 pt 2):417425.
  4. Edelson DP, Yuen TC, Mancini ME, et al. Hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation practice in the United States: a nationally representative survey. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(6):353357.
  5. Reason J. Achieving a safe culture: theory and practice. Work Stress. 1998;12(3):293306.
  6. Wood KA, Ranji SR, Ide B, Dracup K. Rapid response systems in adult academic medical centers. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35(9):475482, 437.
  7. Nasca TJ, Day SH, Amis ES. The new recommendations on duty hours from the ACGME Task Force. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(2):e3.
  8. Jones KJ, Skinner A, Xu L, et al. The AHRQ hospital survey on patient safety culture: a tool to plan and evaluate patient safety programs. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, et al., eds. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 2: Culture and Redesign). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43699. Accessed November 4, 2014.
  9. The ACGME 2011 Duty Hour Standards: Enhancing Quality of Care, Supervision, and Resident Professional Development. Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2011.
  10. DeVita MA, Schaefer J, Lutz J, Wang H, Dongilli T. Improving medical emergency team (MET) performance using a novel curriculum and a computerized human patient simulator. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(5):326331.
  11. Wehbe‐Janek H, Pliego J, Sheather S, Villamaria F. System‐based interprofessional simulation‐based training program increases awareness and use of rapid response teams. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014;40(6):279287.
  12. Internal Medicine Milestone Group. The Internal Medicine Milestone Project. A Joint Initiative of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and The American Board of Internal Medicine. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/InternalMedicineMilestones.pdf. Accessed November 4, 2014.
  13. Weiss KB, Bagian JP, Nasca TJ. The clinical learning environment: the foundation of graduate medical education. JAMA. 2013;309(16):16871688.
  14. Myers JS, Tess A, Glasheen JJ, et al. The Quality and Safety Educators Academy: fulfilling an unmet need for faculty development. Am J Med Qual. 2014;29(1):512.
References
  1. Butcher BW, Quist CE, Harrison JD, Ranji SR. The effect of a rapid response team on resident perceptions of education and autonomy. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(1):812.
  2. Chan PS, Jain R, Nallmothu BK, Berg RA, Sasson C. Rapid response teams: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):1826.
  3. Winters BD, Weaver SJ, Pfoh ER, Yang T, Pham JC, Dy SM. Rapid‐response systems as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 pt 2):417425.
  4. Edelson DP, Yuen TC, Mancini ME, et al. Hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation practice in the United States: a nationally representative survey. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(6):353357.
  5. Reason J. Achieving a safe culture: theory and practice. Work Stress. 1998;12(3):293306.
  6. Wood KA, Ranji SR, Ide B, Dracup K. Rapid response systems in adult academic medical centers. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35(9):475482, 437.
  7. Nasca TJ, Day SH, Amis ES. The new recommendations on duty hours from the ACGME Task Force. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(2):e3.
  8. Jones KJ, Skinner A, Xu L, et al. The AHRQ hospital survey on patient safety culture: a tool to plan and evaluate patient safety programs. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, et al., eds. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 2: Culture and Redesign). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43699. Accessed November 4, 2014.
  9. The ACGME 2011 Duty Hour Standards: Enhancing Quality of Care, Supervision, and Resident Professional Development. Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2011.
  10. DeVita MA, Schaefer J, Lutz J, Wang H, Dongilli T. Improving medical emergency team (MET) performance using a novel curriculum and a computerized human patient simulator. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(5):326331.
  11. Wehbe‐Janek H, Pliego J, Sheather S, Villamaria F. System‐based interprofessional simulation‐based training program increases awareness and use of rapid response teams. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014;40(6):279287.
  12. Internal Medicine Milestone Group. The Internal Medicine Milestone Project. A Joint Initiative of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and The American Board of Internal Medicine. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/InternalMedicineMilestones.pdf. Accessed November 4, 2014.
  13. Weiss KB, Bagian JP, Nasca TJ. The clinical learning environment: the foundation of graduate medical education. JAMA. 2013;309(16):16871688.
  14. Myers JS, Tess A, Glasheen JJ, et al. The Quality and Safety Educators Academy: fulfilling an unmet need for faculty development. Am J Med Qual. 2014;29(1):512.
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(1)
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(1)
Page Number
62-63
Page Number
62-63
Article Type
Display Headline
Rapid response teams in teaching hospitals: Aligning efforts to improve medical education and quality
Display Headline
Rapid response teams in teaching hospitals: Aligning efforts to improve medical education and quality
Sections
Article Source
© 2015 Society of Hospital Medicine
Disallow All Ads
Correspondence Location
Address for correspondence and reprint requests: Kevin J. O'Leary, MD, Division of Hospital Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 211 E. Ontario St., Suite 700, Chicago, IL 60611; E‐mail: [email protected]
Content Gating
Gated (full article locked unless allowed per User)
Gating Strategy
First Peek Free
Article PDF Media

Clinical Decision‐Support Tool

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/02/2017 - 19:34
Display Headline
Clinical decision support: A tool of the hospital trade

The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in US hospitals continues to rise steeply, with nearly 60% of all hospitals having at least a basic EHR as of 2014.[1] EHRs bring with them the ability to inform and guide clinicians as they make decisions. In theory, this form of clinical decision support (CDS) ensures quality of care, reduces adverse events, and improves efficiency; in practice, experience in the field paints a mixed picture.[2, 3] This issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine presents 3 examples of CDS that illustrate the distance between what we see as CDS' full potential and current limitations.

In the study by Herzig et al.[4] investigators took on the challenge of implementing stress ulcer prophylaxis guidelines developed by the Society of Hospital Medicine. The investigators first demonstrated that targeted electronic prompts captured patients' indications for acid suppressive therapy, and could be used to prohibit prescribers from ordering acid suppressive therapy among patients outside the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Through an elegant interrupted time series study design deployed across 2 hospital campuses, the investigators were able to demonstrate immediate and clinically significant reduction in acid suppressive therapy outside the ICU. They further found that the impact of this reduction was augmented over time, suggesting that the electronic prompts had a sustained impact on provider ordering behavior. However, below the headlineand relevant to the limitations of CDSthe investigators noted that much of the reduction in the use of acid suppressive therapy for stress ulcer prophylaxis could be accounted for by providers' choice of another acceptable indication (eg, continuing preadmission medication). The authors speculated that the CDS intervention prompted providers to more accurately record the indication for acid suppressive therapy. It is also possible that providers simply chose an alternate indication to circumvent the decision‐support step. Perhaps as a result of these 2 offsetting factors, the actual use of acid suppressive therapy, regardless of indication, only decreased in a modest and statistically nonsignificant way, casting the true effectiveness of this CDS intervention into question.

Two other studies in this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine[5, 6] provide valuable insights into interactions between social and technical factors[7, 8, 9, 10] that determine the success or failure in the use of technology such as CDS to drive organizational performance. At the technical end of this sociotechnical spectrum, the study by Knight et al.[5] illustrated that a minimally configured and visually unintuitive medication decision‐support system resulted in a high number of alerts (approximately 17% of studied orders), leading to the well‐reported phenomena of alert fatigue and substantially lower response rate compared to those reported in the literature.[11, 12, 13] Moreover, the analysis suggested that response to these alerts were particularly muted among situations that were particularly high risk, including the patient being older, patient having a greater length of stay, care being delivered in the internal medicine service, resident physician being the prescriber, and the medication being on the Institute for Safe Medication Practices list of high‐alert medications. The investigators concluded that a redesign of the medication decision‐support system was needed.

The study by Chen et al.[6] illuminated how social factors pose challenges in implementing CDS. Investigators in this study were previously successful in using a combination of an education campaign and interruptive decision‐support prompts to reduce the inappropriate ordering of blood transfusions. However, even with a successful intervention, up to 30% of transfusions occurred outside of recommended guidelines. This finding prompted the investigators to analyze the free‐text reasons offered by providers for overriding the recommended guidelines. Two key patterns emerged from their structured analysis. First, many of the apparently inappropriate transfusions occurred under officially sanctioned protocols (such as stem cell transplant) that the computer system was not able to take into account in generating alerts. Second, many orders that reflected questionable practices were being entered by resident physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses who were least empowered to challenge requests from senior staff.

Several practical and actionable lessons can be drawn from the 3 sets of investigators featured in this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine. First, all investigators defined metrics that should be tracked over time to demonstrate progress and to make iterative improvements; this discipline is needed in both academic and community settings to prioritize limited CDS resources in an objective and data‐driven way. Second, as the Herzig et al.[4] article illustrated, when it comes to evaluating the impact of CDS, we cannot be satisfied merely with process measures (eg, change in clinical documentation) at the expense of outcome measures (eg, decrease in inappropriate use of therapies). Third, as Chen et al.[6] recognized, CDS is but a component of an educational program to guide and alter clinical behavior, and must be deployed in conjunction with other educational tools such as newsletters, traditional lectures, or academic detailing. Fourth, clinicians with a stake in improving quality and safety should be on guard against the well‐documented phenomena of alert fatigue by ensuring their organization selects an appropriate framework for deciding which CDS alerts are activated andwhere possibledisplay the highest‐priority alerts in the most prominent and interruptive manner. Fifth, CDS must be maintained over time as clinical guidelines and clinicians' receptivity to each CDS evolve. Alerts that are not changing clinical behavior should either be modified or simply turned off. Sixth, free text entered as part of structured data entry (eg, while placing orders) or as reasons for overriding CDS (as in Chen et al.[6]) offer significant insights on how to optimize CDS, and should be monitored systematically on an ongoing basis to ensure the EMR addresses users' changing needs and mental models.

So what is the clinician with an interest in improving healthcare outcomes and organizational efficiency to do given CDS' limitations? One option is to wait for the science of CDS to further mature and have those advances embedded in the EMR at your organization. Another option might be to rely on the information technology and clinical informatics professionals at your organization to decide how CDS should be used locally. In 2014, these may be untenable choices for the following reasons. First, given the universal pressures to improve healthcare outcomes and contain costs,[14] healthcare organizations must use all available tools to achieve challenging performance goals. Second, as EMRs with CDS become commonplace, and as the 3 articles in this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine and others have illustrated, there are many opportunities to misuse or poorly implement CDS, with potentially dire consequences.[15] Third, design and deployment of effective CDS require information technology and informatics professionals to collaborate with clinicians to gauge the quality of EMR data used to drive CDS and clinicians' receptivity to CDS, illuminate the sociotechnical context in which to deploy the CDS, and champion the CDS intervention among their colleagues. Clinicians' input is therefore an essential ingredient to success. Fourth, organizational trust, a key aspect of a healthy safety culture, is hard to build and easy to erode.[9, 16] If clinicians at an organization lose trust in CDS because of poor design and deployment strategies, they are likely to ignore CDS in the future.[17]

Like tools introduced into medicine such as magnetic resonance imaging and highly active antiretroviral therapy, CDS will need to evolve as the clinical community grapples with its potential and limitations. As EMRs move toward ubiquity in the hospital setting, CDS will become part of the fabric of hospital‐based practice, and the Journal of Hospital Medicine readership would do well to learn about this new tool of the trade.

Disclosure

Disclosure: Nothing to report.

Files
References
  1. Adler-Milstein J, DesRoches CM, Furukawa MF, et al. More than half of US hospitals have at least a basic EHR, but stage 2 criteria remain challenging for most. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(9):16641671.
  2. Berner ES. Clinical Decision Support Systems: State of the Art. AHRQ publication no. 09–0069‐EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009.
  3. Karsh B‐T. Clinical practice improvement and redesign: how change in workflow can be supported by clinical decision support. AHRQ Publication No. 09–0054‐EF. Rockville, Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. June 2009.
  4. SJ Herzig, JR Guess, DB Feinbloom, M Adra, KA Afonso, MD Howell, ER Marcantonio. Improving Appropriateness of Acid-Suppressive Medication Use via Computerized Clinical Decision Support. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(1):4145.
  5. AM Knight, O Falade, J Maygers, JE Sevransky. Factors Associated With Medication Warning Acceptance for Hospitalized Adults. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(1):1925.
  6. Chen JH, Fang DZ, Goodnough LT, Evans KH, Lee Porter M, Shieh L. Why providers transfuse blood products outside recommended guidelines in spite of integrated electronic best practice alerts. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(1):17.
  7. Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dysktra RH, Guappone K, Carpenter JD, Seshadri V. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int J Med Inform. 2007:76(1):S21S27.
  8. Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended Consequences of Information Technologies in Health Care–An Interactive Sociotechnical Analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;15:542549
  9. Sitting DF, and Singh H. A new socio‐technical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 19(Supplement 3): i6874, October 2010;
  10. Brigham Young University. Socio‐technical Theory. http://istheory.byu.edu/wiki/Socio‐technical_theory (Last updated 11/15/2011).
  11. Weingart SN, Seger AC, Feola N, Heffernan J, Schiff G, Isaac T. Electronic drug interaction alerts in ambulatory care: the value and acceptance of high-value alerts in US medical practices as assessed by an expert clinical panel. Drug Saf. 2011;34(7):58793.
  12. Shah NR, Seger AC, Seger DL, Fiskio JM, Kuperman GJ, Blumenfeld B, Recklet EG, Bates DW, Gandhi TK. Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan–Feb;13(1):511. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
  13. Slight SP, Seger DL, Nanji KC, Cho I, Maniam N, Dykes PC, Bates DW. Are we heeding the warning signs? Examining providers' overrides of computerized drug‐drug interaction alerts in primary care. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e85071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085071. eCollection 2013.
  14. Berwick DM, Nolan TW. Whittington. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff. 2008;27:759769.
  15. Committee on Patient Safety and Health Information Technology; Institute of Medicine. Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2012.
  16. Burns C, Mearns K, McGeorge P. Explicit and implicit trust within safety culture. Risk Anal. 2006;26(5):11391150.
  17. Kesselheim AS, Cresswell K, Phansalkar S, Bates DW, Sheikh A. Clinical decision support systems could be modified to reduce ‘alert fatigue’ while still minimizing the risk of litigation. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30:23102317.
Article PDF
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(1)
Page Number
60-61
Sections
Files
Files
Article PDF
Article PDF

The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in US hospitals continues to rise steeply, with nearly 60% of all hospitals having at least a basic EHR as of 2014.[1] EHRs bring with them the ability to inform and guide clinicians as they make decisions. In theory, this form of clinical decision support (CDS) ensures quality of care, reduces adverse events, and improves efficiency; in practice, experience in the field paints a mixed picture.[2, 3] This issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine presents 3 examples of CDS that illustrate the distance between what we see as CDS' full potential and current limitations.

In the study by Herzig et al.[4] investigators took on the challenge of implementing stress ulcer prophylaxis guidelines developed by the Society of Hospital Medicine. The investigators first demonstrated that targeted electronic prompts captured patients' indications for acid suppressive therapy, and could be used to prohibit prescribers from ordering acid suppressive therapy among patients outside the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Through an elegant interrupted time series study design deployed across 2 hospital campuses, the investigators were able to demonstrate immediate and clinically significant reduction in acid suppressive therapy outside the ICU. They further found that the impact of this reduction was augmented over time, suggesting that the electronic prompts had a sustained impact on provider ordering behavior. However, below the headlineand relevant to the limitations of CDSthe investigators noted that much of the reduction in the use of acid suppressive therapy for stress ulcer prophylaxis could be accounted for by providers' choice of another acceptable indication (eg, continuing preadmission medication). The authors speculated that the CDS intervention prompted providers to more accurately record the indication for acid suppressive therapy. It is also possible that providers simply chose an alternate indication to circumvent the decision‐support step. Perhaps as a result of these 2 offsetting factors, the actual use of acid suppressive therapy, regardless of indication, only decreased in a modest and statistically nonsignificant way, casting the true effectiveness of this CDS intervention into question.

Two other studies in this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine[5, 6] provide valuable insights into interactions between social and technical factors[7, 8, 9, 10] that determine the success or failure in the use of technology such as CDS to drive organizational performance. At the technical end of this sociotechnical spectrum, the study by Knight et al.[5] illustrated that a minimally configured and visually unintuitive medication decision‐support system resulted in a high number of alerts (approximately 17% of studied orders), leading to the well‐reported phenomena of alert fatigue and substantially lower response rate compared to those reported in the literature.[11, 12, 13] Moreover, the analysis suggested that response to these alerts were particularly muted among situations that were particularly high risk, including the patient being older, patient having a greater length of stay, care being delivered in the internal medicine service, resident physician being the prescriber, and the medication being on the Institute for Safe Medication Practices list of high‐alert medications. The investigators concluded that a redesign of the medication decision‐support system was needed.

The study by Chen et al.[6] illuminated how social factors pose challenges in implementing CDS. Investigators in this study were previously successful in using a combination of an education campaign and interruptive decision‐support prompts to reduce the inappropriate ordering of blood transfusions. However, even with a successful intervention, up to 30% of transfusions occurred outside of recommended guidelines. This finding prompted the investigators to analyze the free‐text reasons offered by providers for overriding the recommended guidelines. Two key patterns emerged from their structured analysis. First, many of the apparently inappropriate transfusions occurred under officially sanctioned protocols (such as stem cell transplant) that the computer system was not able to take into account in generating alerts. Second, many orders that reflected questionable practices were being entered by resident physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses who were least empowered to challenge requests from senior staff.

Several practical and actionable lessons can be drawn from the 3 sets of investigators featured in this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine. First, all investigators defined metrics that should be tracked over time to demonstrate progress and to make iterative improvements; this discipline is needed in both academic and community settings to prioritize limited CDS resources in an objective and data‐driven way. Second, as the Herzig et al.[4] article illustrated, when it comes to evaluating the impact of CDS, we cannot be satisfied merely with process measures (eg, change in clinical documentation) at the expense of outcome measures (eg, decrease in inappropriate use of therapies). Third, as Chen et al.[6] recognized, CDS is but a component of an educational program to guide and alter clinical behavior, and must be deployed in conjunction with other educational tools such as newsletters, traditional lectures, or academic detailing. Fourth, clinicians with a stake in improving quality and safety should be on guard against the well‐documented phenomena of alert fatigue by ensuring their organization selects an appropriate framework for deciding which CDS alerts are activated andwhere possibledisplay the highest‐priority alerts in the most prominent and interruptive manner. Fifth, CDS must be maintained over time as clinical guidelines and clinicians' receptivity to each CDS evolve. Alerts that are not changing clinical behavior should either be modified or simply turned off. Sixth, free text entered as part of structured data entry (eg, while placing orders) or as reasons for overriding CDS (as in Chen et al.[6]) offer significant insights on how to optimize CDS, and should be monitored systematically on an ongoing basis to ensure the EMR addresses users' changing needs and mental models.

So what is the clinician with an interest in improving healthcare outcomes and organizational efficiency to do given CDS' limitations? One option is to wait for the science of CDS to further mature and have those advances embedded in the EMR at your organization. Another option might be to rely on the information technology and clinical informatics professionals at your organization to decide how CDS should be used locally. In 2014, these may be untenable choices for the following reasons. First, given the universal pressures to improve healthcare outcomes and contain costs,[14] healthcare organizations must use all available tools to achieve challenging performance goals. Second, as EMRs with CDS become commonplace, and as the 3 articles in this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine and others have illustrated, there are many opportunities to misuse or poorly implement CDS, with potentially dire consequences.[15] Third, design and deployment of effective CDS require information technology and informatics professionals to collaborate with clinicians to gauge the quality of EMR data used to drive CDS and clinicians' receptivity to CDS, illuminate the sociotechnical context in which to deploy the CDS, and champion the CDS intervention among their colleagues. Clinicians' input is therefore an essential ingredient to success. Fourth, organizational trust, a key aspect of a healthy safety culture, is hard to build and easy to erode.[9, 16] If clinicians at an organization lose trust in CDS because of poor design and deployment strategies, they are likely to ignore CDS in the future.[17]

Like tools introduced into medicine such as magnetic resonance imaging and highly active antiretroviral therapy, CDS will need to evolve as the clinical community grapples with its potential and limitations. As EMRs move toward ubiquity in the hospital setting, CDS will become part of the fabric of hospital‐based practice, and the Journal of Hospital Medicine readership would do well to learn about this new tool of the trade.

Disclosure

Disclosure: Nothing to report.

The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in US hospitals continues to rise steeply, with nearly 60% of all hospitals having at least a basic EHR as of 2014.[1] EHRs bring with them the ability to inform and guide clinicians as they make decisions. In theory, this form of clinical decision support (CDS) ensures quality of care, reduces adverse events, and improves efficiency; in practice, experience in the field paints a mixed picture.[2, 3] This issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine presents 3 examples of CDS that illustrate the distance between what we see as CDS' full potential and current limitations.

In the study by Herzig et al.[4] investigators took on the challenge of implementing stress ulcer prophylaxis guidelines developed by the Society of Hospital Medicine. The investigators first demonstrated that targeted electronic prompts captured patients' indications for acid suppressive therapy, and could be used to prohibit prescribers from ordering acid suppressive therapy among patients outside the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Through an elegant interrupted time series study design deployed across 2 hospital campuses, the investigators were able to demonstrate immediate and clinically significant reduction in acid suppressive therapy outside the ICU. They further found that the impact of this reduction was augmented over time, suggesting that the electronic prompts had a sustained impact on provider ordering behavior. However, below the headlineand relevant to the limitations of CDSthe investigators noted that much of the reduction in the use of acid suppressive therapy for stress ulcer prophylaxis could be accounted for by providers' choice of another acceptable indication (eg, continuing preadmission medication). The authors speculated that the CDS intervention prompted providers to more accurately record the indication for acid suppressive therapy. It is also possible that providers simply chose an alternate indication to circumvent the decision‐support step. Perhaps as a result of these 2 offsetting factors, the actual use of acid suppressive therapy, regardless of indication, only decreased in a modest and statistically nonsignificant way, casting the true effectiveness of this CDS intervention into question.

Two other studies in this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine[5, 6] provide valuable insights into interactions between social and technical factors[7, 8, 9, 10] that determine the success or failure in the use of technology such as CDS to drive organizational performance. At the technical end of this sociotechnical spectrum, the study by Knight et al.[5] illustrated that a minimally configured and visually unintuitive medication decision‐support system resulted in a high number of alerts (approximately 17% of studied orders), leading to the well‐reported phenomena of alert fatigue and substantially lower response rate compared to those reported in the literature.[11, 12, 13] Moreover, the analysis suggested that response to these alerts were particularly muted among situations that were particularly high risk, including the patient being older, patient having a greater length of stay, care being delivered in the internal medicine service, resident physician being the prescriber, and the medication being on the Institute for Safe Medication Practices list of high‐alert medications. The investigators concluded that a redesign of the medication decision‐support system was needed.

The study by Chen et al.[6] illuminated how social factors pose challenges in implementing CDS. Investigators in this study were previously successful in using a combination of an education campaign and interruptive decision‐support prompts to reduce the inappropriate ordering of blood transfusions. However, even with a successful intervention, up to 30% of transfusions occurred outside of recommended guidelines. This finding prompted the investigators to analyze the free‐text reasons offered by providers for overriding the recommended guidelines. Two key patterns emerged from their structured analysis. First, many of the apparently inappropriate transfusions occurred under officially sanctioned protocols (such as stem cell transplant) that the computer system was not able to take into account in generating alerts. Second, many orders that reflected questionable practices were being entered by resident physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses who were least empowered to challenge requests from senior staff.

Several practical and actionable lessons can be drawn from the 3 sets of investigators featured in this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine. First, all investigators defined metrics that should be tracked over time to demonstrate progress and to make iterative improvements; this discipline is needed in both academic and community settings to prioritize limited CDS resources in an objective and data‐driven way. Second, as the Herzig et al.[4] article illustrated, when it comes to evaluating the impact of CDS, we cannot be satisfied merely with process measures (eg, change in clinical documentation) at the expense of outcome measures (eg, decrease in inappropriate use of therapies). Third, as Chen et al.[6] recognized, CDS is but a component of an educational program to guide and alter clinical behavior, and must be deployed in conjunction with other educational tools such as newsletters, traditional lectures, or academic detailing. Fourth, clinicians with a stake in improving quality and safety should be on guard against the well‐documented phenomena of alert fatigue by ensuring their organization selects an appropriate framework for deciding which CDS alerts are activated andwhere possibledisplay the highest‐priority alerts in the most prominent and interruptive manner. Fifth, CDS must be maintained over time as clinical guidelines and clinicians' receptivity to each CDS evolve. Alerts that are not changing clinical behavior should either be modified or simply turned off. Sixth, free text entered as part of structured data entry (eg, while placing orders) or as reasons for overriding CDS (as in Chen et al.[6]) offer significant insights on how to optimize CDS, and should be monitored systematically on an ongoing basis to ensure the EMR addresses users' changing needs and mental models.

So what is the clinician with an interest in improving healthcare outcomes and organizational efficiency to do given CDS' limitations? One option is to wait for the science of CDS to further mature and have those advances embedded in the EMR at your organization. Another option might be to rely on the information technology and clinical informatics professionals at your organization to decide how CDS should be used locally. In 2014, these may be untenable choices for the following reasons. First, given the universal pressures to improve healthcare outcomes and contain costs,[14] healthcare organizations must use all available tools to achieve challenging performance goals. Second, as EMRs with CDS become commonplace, and as the 3 articles in this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine and others have illustrated, there are many opportunities to misuse or poorly implement CDS, with potentially dire consequences.[15] Third, design and deployment of effective CDS require information technology and informatics professionals to collaborate with clinicians to gauge the quality of EMR data used to drive CDS and clinicians' receptivity to CDS, illuminate the sociotechnical context in which to deploy the CDS, and champion the CDS intervention among their colleagues. Clinicians' input is therefore an essential ingredient to success. Fourth, organizational trust, a key aspect of a healthy safety culture, is hard to build and easy to erode.[9, 16] If clinicians at an organization lose trust in CDS because of poor design and deployment strategies, they are likely to ignore CDS in the future.[17]

Like tools introduced into medicine such as magnetic resonance imaging and highly active antiretroviral therapy, CDS will need to evolve as the clinical community grapples with its potential and limitations. As EMRs move toward ubiquity in the hospital setting, CDS will become part of the fabric of hospital‐based practice, and the Journal of Hospital Medicine readership would do well to learn about this new tool of the trade.

Disclosure

Disclosure: Nothing to report.

References
  1. Adler-Milstein J, DesRoches CM, Furukawa MF, et al. More than half of US hospitals have at least a basic EHR, but stage 2 criteria remain challenging for most. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(9):16641671.
  2. Berner ES. Clinical Decision Support Systems: State of the Art. AHRQ publication no. 09–0069‐EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009.
  3. Karsh B‐T. Clinical practice improvement and redesign: how change in workflow can be supported by clinical decision support. AHRQ Publication No. 09–0054‐EF. Rockville, Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. June 2009.
  4. SJ Herzig, JR Guess, DB Feinbloom, M Adra, KA Afonso, MD Howell, ER Marcantonio. Improving Appropriateness of Acid-Suppressive Medication Use via Computerized Clinical Decision Support. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(1):4145.
  5. AM Knight, O Falade, J Maygers, JE Sevransky. Factors Associated With Medication Warning Acceptance for Hospitalized Adults. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(1):1925.
  6. Chen JH, Fang DZ, Goodnough LT, Evans KH, Lee Porter M, Shieh L. Why providers transfuse blood products outside recommended guidelines in spite of integrated electronic best practice alerts. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(1):17.
  7. Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dysktra RH, Guappone K, Carpenter JD, Seshadri V. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int J Med Inform. 2007:76(1):S21S27.
  8. Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended Consequences of Information Technologies in Health Care–An Interactive Sociotechnical Analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;15:542549
  9. Sitting DF, and Singh H. A new socio‐technical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 19(Supplement 3): i6874, October 2010;
  10. Brigham Young University. Socio‐technical Theory. http://istheory.byu.edu/wiki/Socio‐technical_theory (Last updated 11/15/2011).
  11. Weingart SN, Seger AC, Feola N, Heffernan J, Schiff G, Isaac T. Electronic drug interaction alerts in ambulatory care: the value and acceptance of high-value alerts in US medical practices as assessed by an expert clinical panel. Drug Saf. 2011;34(7):58793.
  12. Shah NR, Seger AC, Seger DL, Fiskio JM, Kuperman GJ, Blumenfeld B, Recklet EG, Bates DW, Gandhi TK. Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan–Feb;13(1):511. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
  13. Slight SP, Seger DL, Nanji KC, Cho I, Maniam N, Dykes PC, Bates DW. Are we heeding the warning signs? Examining providers' overrides of computerized drug‐drug interaction alerts in primary care. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e85071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085071. eCollection 2013.
  14. Berwick DM, Nolan TW. Whittington. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff. 2008;27:759769.
  15. Committee on Patient Safety and Health Information Technology; Institute of Medicine. Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2012.
  16. Burns C, Mearns K, McGeorge P. Explicit and implicit trust within safety culture. Risk Anal. 2006;26(5):11391150.
  17. Kesselheim AS, Cresswell K, Phansalkar S, Bates DW, Sheikh A. Clinical decision support systems could be modified to reduce ‘alert fatigue’ while still minimizing the risk of litigation. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30:23102317.
References
  1. Adler-Milstein J, DesRoches CM, Furukawa MF, et al. More than half of US hospitals have at least a basic EHR, but stage 2 criteria remain challenging for most. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(9):16641671.
  2. Berner ES. Clinical Decision Support Systems: State of the Art. AHRQ publication no. 09–0069‐EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009.
  3. Karsh B‐T. Clinical practice improvement and redesign: how change in workflow can be supported by clinical decision support. AHRQ Publication No. 09–0054‐EF. Rockville, Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. June 2009.
  4. SJ Herzig, JR Guess, DB Feinbloom, M Adra, KA Afonso, MD Howell, ER Marcantonio. Improving Appropriateness of Acid-Suppressive Medication Use via Computerized Clinical Decision Support. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(1):4145.
  5. AM Knight, O Falade, J Maygers, JE Sevransky. Factors Associated With Medication Warning Acceptance for Hospitalized Adults. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(1):1925.
  6. Chen JH, Fang DZ, Goodnough LT, Evans KH, Lee Porter M, Shieh L. Why providers transfuse blood products outside recommended guidelines in spite of integrated electronic best practice alerts. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(1):17.
  7. Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dysktra RH, Guappone K, Carpenter JD, Seshadri V. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int J Med Inform. 2007:76(1):S21S27.
  8. Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended Consequences of Information Technologies in Health Care–An Interactive Sociotechnical Analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;15:542549
  9. Sitting DF, and Singh H. A new socio‐technical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 19(Supplement 3): i6874, October 2010;
  10. Brigham Young University. Socio‐technical Theory. http://istheory.byu.edu/wiki/Socio‐technical_theory (Last updated 11/15/2011).
  11. Weingart SN, Seger AC, Feola N, Heffernan J, Schiff G, Isaac T. Electronic drug interaction alerts in ambulatory care: the value and acceptance of high-value alerts in US medical practices as assessed by an expert clinical panel. Drug Saf. 2011;34(7):58793.
  12. Shah NR, Seger AC, Seger DL, Fiskio JM, Kuperman GJ, Blumenfeld B, Recklet EG, Bates DW, Gandhi TK. Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan–Feb;13(1):511. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
  13. Slight SP, Seger DL, Nanji KC, Cho I, Maniam N, Dykes PC, Bates DW. Are we heeding the warning signs? Examining providers' overrides of computerized drug‐drug interaction alerts in primary care. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e85071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085071. eCollection 2013.
  14. Berwick DM, Nolan TW. Whittington. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff. 2008;27:759769.
  15. Committee on Patient Safety and Health Information Technology; Institute of Medicine. Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2012.
  16. Burns C, Mearns K, McGeorge P. Explicit and implicit trust within safety culture. Risk Anal. 2006;26(5):11391150.
  17. Kesselheim AS, Cresswell K, Phansalkar S, Bates DW, Sheikh A. Clinical decision support systems could be modified to reduce ‘alert fatigue’ while still minimizing the risk of litigation. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30:23102317.
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(1)
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(1)
Page Number
60-61
Page Number
60-61
Article Type
Display Headline
Clinical decision support: A tool of the hospital trade
Display Headline
Clinical decision support: A tool of the hospital trade
Sections
Article Source
© 2015 Society of Hospital Medicine
Disallow All Ads
Correspondence Location
Address for correspondence and reprint requests: Eric G. Poon, MD, Infectious Boston Medical Center, BCD 5002, 800 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA 02118; E‐mail: [email protected]
Content Gating
Gated (full article locked unless allowed per User)
Gating Strategy
First Peek Free
Article PDF Media
Media Files

Effect of an RRT on Resident Perceptions

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 05/21/2017 - 13:32
Display Headline
The effect of a rapid response team on resident perceptions of education and autonomy

Rapid response teams (RRTs) have been promoted by patient safety and quality‐improvement organizations as a strategy to reduce preventable in‐hospital deaths.[1] To date, critical analysis of RRTs has focused primarily on their impact on quality‐of‐care metrics.[2, 3, 4] Comparatively few studies have examined the cultural and educational impact of RRTs, particularly at academic medical centers, and those that do exist have focused almost exclusively on perceptions of nurses rather than resident physicians.[5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

Although a prior study found that internal medicine and general surgery residents believed that RRTs improved patient safety, they were largely ambivalent about the RRT's impact on education and training.[11] To date, there has been no focused assessment of resident physician impressions of an RRT across years of training and medical specialty to inform the use of this multidisciplinary team as a component of their residency education.

We sought to determine whether resident physicians at a tertiary care academic medical center perceive educational benefit from collaboration with the RRT and whether they feel that the RRT adversely affects clinical autonomy.

METHODS

The Hospital

Moffitt‐Long Hospital, the tertiary academic medical center of the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), is a 600‐bed acute care hospital that provides comprehensive critical care services and serves as a major referral center in northern California. There are roughly 5000 admissions to the hospital annually. At the time the study was conducted, there were approximately 200 RRT calls per 1000 adult hospital discharges.

The Rapid Response Team

The RRT is called to assess, triage, and treat patients who have experienced a decline in their clinical status short of a cardiopulmonary arrest. The RRT has been operational at UCSF since June 1, 2007, and is composed of a dedicated critical care nurse and respiratory therapist available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The RRT can be activated by any concerned staff member based on vital sign abnormalities, decreased urine output, changes in mental status, or any significant concern about the trajectory of the patient's clinical course.

When the RRT is called on a given patient, the patient's primary physician (at our institution, a resident) is also called to the bedside and works alongside the RRT to address the patient's acute clinical needs. The primary physician, bedside nurse, and RRT discuss the plan of care for the patient, including clinical evaluation, management, and the need for additional monitoring or a transition to a higher level of care. Residents at our institution receive no formal instruction regarding the role of the RRT or curriculum on interfacing with the RRT, and they do not serve as members of the RRT as part of a clinical rotation.

The Survey Process

Study subjects were asked via e‐mail to participate in a brief online survey. Subjects were offered the opportunity to win a $100 gift certificate in return for their participation. Weekly e‐mail reminders were sent for a period of 3 months or until a given subject had completed the survey. The survey was administered over a 3‐month period, from March through May, to allow time for residents to work with the RRT during the academic year. The Committee on Human Research at the University of California San Francisco Medical Center approved the study.

Target Population

All residents in specialties that involved direct patient care and the potential to use the adult RRT were included in the study. This included residents in the fields of internal medicine, neurology, general surgery, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, urology, and otolaryngology (Table 1). Residents in pediatrics and obstetrics and gynecology were excluded, as emergencies in their patients are addressed by a pediatric RRT and an obstetric anesthesiologist, respectively. Residents in anesthesiology were excluded as they do not care for nonintensive care unit (ICU) patients as part of the primary team and are not involved in RRT encounters.

Demographics of Survey Respondents (N=236)
DemographicNo. (%)
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: RRT, rapid response team; SD, standard deviation.

  • Where data do not equal 100%, this is due to missing data or rounding. Table does not include 10 respondents who had never cared for a patient for whom the RRT was activated.

Medical specialty 
Internal medicine145 (61.4)
Neurology18 (7.6)
General surgery31 (13.1)
Orthopedic surgery17 (7.2)
Neurosurgery4 (1.7)
Plastic surgery2 (0.8)
Urology9 (3.8)
Otolaryngology10 (4.2)
Years of postgraduate trainingAverage 2.34 (SD 1.41)
183 (35.2)
260 (25.4)
355 (23.3)
420 (8.5)
58 (3.4)
65 (2.1)
75 (2.1)
Gender 
Male133 (56.4)
Female102 (43.2)
Had exposure to RRT during training 
Yes106 (44.9)
No127 (53.8)
Had previously initiated a call to the RRT 
Yes106 (44.9)
No128 (54.2)

Survey Design

The resident survey contained 20 RRT‐related items and 7 demographic and practice items. Responses for RRT‐related questions utilized a 5‐point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The survey was piloted prior to administration to check comprehension and interpretation by physicians with experience in survey writing (for the full survey, see Supporting Information, Appendix, in the online version of this article).

Survey Objectives

The survey was designed to capture the experiences of residents who had cared for a patient for whom the RRT had been activated. Data collected included residents' perceptions of the impact of the RRT on their residency education and clinical autonomy, the quality of care provided, patient safety, and hospital‐wide culture. Potential barriers to use of the RRT were also examined.

Outcomes

The study's primary outcomes included the perceived educational benefit of the RRT and its perceived impact on clinical autonomy. Secondary outcomes included the effect of years of training and resident specialty on both the perceived educational benefit and impact on clinical autonomy among our study group.

Statistical Analysis

Responses to each survey item were described for each specialty, and subgroup analysis was conducted. For years of training, that item was dichotomized into either 1 year (henceforth referred to as interns) or greater than 1 year (henceforth referred to as upper‐level residents). Resident specialty was dichotomized into medical fields (internal medicine and neurology) or surgical fields. For statistical analysis, agreement statements were collapsed to either disagree (strongly disagree/disagree), neutral, or agree (strongly agree/agree). The influence of years of resident training and resident specialty was assessed for all items in the survey using 2 or Fisher exact tests as appropriate for the 3 agreement categories. Analysis was conducted using SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

RESULTS

There were 246 responses to the survey of a possible 342, yielding a response rate of 72% (Table 2). Ten respondents stated that they had never cared for a patient where the RRT had been activated. Given their lack of exposure to the RRT, these respondents were excluded from the analysis, yielding a final sample size of 236. The demographic and clinical practice characteristics of respondents are shown in Table 1.

Resident Perceptions of the RRT (N=236)
The residentStrongly Disagree/Disagree, n (%)Neutral, n (%)Agree/ Strongly Agree, n (%)
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: RRT, rapid response team.

  • Where data do not equal 100%, this is due to missing data or rounding. Includes only data for respondents who had cared for a patient that required RRT activation.

Is comfortable managing the unstable patient without the RRT104 (44.1)64 (27.1)66 (28.0)
And RRT work together to make treatment decisions10 (4.2)13 (5.5)208 (88.1)
Believes there are fewer opportunities to care for unstable floor patients due to the RRT188 (79.7)26 (11.0)17 (7.2)
Feels less prepared to care for unstable patients due to the RRT201 (85.2)22 (9.3)13 (5.5)
Feels that working with the RRT creates a valuable educational experience9 (3.8)39 (16.5)184 (78.0)
Feels that nurses caring for the unstable patient should always contact them prior to contacting the RRT123 (52.1)33 (14.0)76 (32.2)
Would be unhappy with nurses calling RRT prior to contacting them141 (59.7)44 (18.6)51 (21.6)
Perceives that the presence of RRT decreases residents' autonomy179 (75.8)25 (10.6)28 (11.9)

Demographics and Primary Outcomes

Interns comprised 83 (35%) of the respondents; the average time in postgraduate training was 2.34 years (standard deviation=1.41). Of respondents, 163 (69%) were in medical fields, and 73 (31%) were in surgical fields. Overall responses to the survey are shown in Table 2, and subgroup analysis is shown in Table 3.

Perceptions of the RRT Based on Years of Training and Specialty
The resident1 Year, n=83, n (%)>1 Year, n=153, n (%)P ValueMedical, n=163, n (%)Surgical, n=73, n (%)P Value
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: RRT, rapid response team.

  • Where data do not equal 100%, this is due to missing data or rounding.

Is comfortable managing the unstable patient without the RRT  0.01  <0.01
Strongly disagree/disagree39 (47.6)65 (42.8) 67 (41.6)37 (50.7) 
Neutral29 (35.4)35 (23.0) 56 (34.8)8 (11.0) 
Agree/strongly agree14 (17.1)52 (34.2) 38 (23.6)28 (38.4) 
And RRT work together to make treatment decisions  0.61  0.04
Strongly disagree/disagree2 (2.4)8 (5.4) 4 (2.5)6 (8.7) 
Neutral5 (6.1)8 (5.4) 7 (4.3)6 (8.7) 
Agree/strongly agree75 (91.5)137 (89.3) 151 (93.2)57 (82.6) 
Believes there are fewer opportunities to care for unstable floor patients due to the RRT  0.05  0.04
Strongly disagree/disagree59 (72.8)129 (86.0) 136 (85.5)52 (72.2) 
Neutral13 (16.0)13 (8.7) 15 (9.4)11 (15.3) 
Agree/strongly agree9 (11.1)8 (5.3) 8 (5.0)9 (12.5) 
Feels less prepared to care for unstable patients due to the RRT  <0.01  0.79
Strongly disagree/disagree62 (74.7)139 (90.8) 140 (85.9)61 (83.6) 
Neutral14 (16.9)8 (5.2) 15 (9.2)7 (9.6) 
Agree/Strongly agree7 (8.4)6 (3.9) 8 (4.9)5 (6.8) 
Feels working with the RRT is a valuable educational experience  0.61  0.01
Strongly disagree/disagree2 (2.4)7 (4.7) 2 (1.2)7 (9.9) 
Neutral12 (14.6)27 (18.0) 25 (15.5)14 (19.7) 
Agree/strongly agree68 (82.9)116 (77.3) 134 (83.2)50 (70.4) 
Feels nurses caring for unstable patients should always contact the resident prior to contacting the RRT  0.49  <0.01
Strongly disagree/disagree47 (57.3)76 (50.7) 97 (60.2)26 (36.6) 
Neutral9 (11.0)24 (16.0) 26 (16.1)7 (9.9) 
Agree/strongly agree26 (31.7)50 (33.3) 38 (23.6)38 (53.5) 
Would be unhappy with nurses calling RRT prior to contacting them  0.81  <0.01
Strongly disagree/disagree51 (61.4)90 (58.8) 109 (66.9)32 (43.8) 
Neutral16 (19.3)28 (18.3) 30 (18.4)14 (19.2) 
Agree/strongly agree16 (19.3)35 (22.9) 24 (14.7)27 (37.0) 
Perceives that the presence of the RRT decreases autonomy as a physician  0.95  0.18
Strongly disagree/disagree63 (77.8)116 (76.8) 127 (79.9)52 (71.2) 
Neutral9 (11.1)16 (10.6) 17 (10.7)8 (11.0) 
Agree/strongly agree9 (11.1)19 (12.6) 15 (9.4)13 (17.8) 

Effect of the RRT on Resident Education

Of all residents, 66 (28%) agreed that they felt comfortable managing an unstable patient without the assistance of the RRT. Surgical residents felt more comfortable managing an unstable patient alone (38%) compared medical residents (24%) (P<0.01). Interns felt less comfortable caring for unstable patients without the RRT's assistance (17%) compared with upper‐level residents (34%) (P=0.01).

Residents overall disagreed with the statement that the RRT left them feeling less prepared to care for unstable patients (n=201; 85%). More upper‐level residents disagreed with this assertion (91%) compared with interns (75%) (P<0.01). Responses to this question did not differ significantly between medical and surgical residents.

Upper‐level residents were more likely to disagree with the statement that the RRT resulted in fewer opportunities to care for unstable patients (n=129; 86%) compared with interns (n=59; 73%) (P=0.05). Medical residents were also more likely to disagree with this statement (n=136; 86%) compared with surgical residents (n=52; 72%) (P=0.04).

With respect to residents' overall impressions of the educational value of the RRT, 68 (83%) interns and 116 (77%) upper‐level residents agreed that it provided a valuable educational experience (P=0.61). Medical and surgical residents differed in this regard, with 134 (83%) medical residents and 50 (70%) surgical residents agreeing that the RRT provided a valuable educational experience (P=0.01).

Effect of the RRT on Clinical Autonomy

Of all residents, 123 (52%) disagreed that the bedside nurse should always contact the primary resident prior to calling the RRT; 76 (32%) agreed with this statement. Medicine residents were more likely to disagree with this approach (n=97; 60%) than were surgical residents (n=26; 36%) (P<0.01). There was no difference between interns and upper‐level residents in response to this question. Most of those who disagreed with this statement were medical residents, whereas most surgical residents (n=38; 54%) agreed that they should be contacted first (P<0.01).

There were no differences between interns and upper‐level residents with respect to perceptions of the RRT's impact on clinical autonomy: 11% of interns and 13% of residents agreed that the RRT decreased their clinical autonomy as a physician. There was no significant difference between medical and surgical residents' responses to this question.

The majority of residents (n=208; 88%) agreed that they and the RRT work together to make treatment decisions for patients. This was true regardless of year of training (P=0.61), but it was expressed more often among medical residents than surgical residents (n=151, 93% vs n=57, 83%; P=0.04).

DISCUSSION

Most studies examining the educational and cultural impact of RRTs exist in the nursing literature. These studies demonstrate that medical and surgical nurses are often reluctant to call the RRT for fear of criticism by the patient's physician.[5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13] In contrast, our data demonstrate that resident physicians across all levels of training and specialties have a positive view of the RRT and its role in patient care. The data support our hypothesis that although most residents perceive educational benefit from their interactions with the RRT, this perception is greater for less‐experienced residents and for those residents who routinely provide care for critically ill patients and serve as code team leaders. In addition, a minority of residents, irrespective of years of training or medical specialty, felt that the RRT negatively impacted their clinical autonomy.

Our data have several important implications. First, although over half of the residents surveyed had not been exposed to RRTs during medical school, and despite having no formal training on the role of the RRT during residency, most residents identified their interactions with the RRT as potential learning opportunities. This finding differs from that of Benin and colleagues, who suggested that RRTs might negatively impact residents' educational development and decrease opportunities for high‐stakes clinical reasoning by allowing the clinical decision‐making process to be driven by the RRT staff rather than the resident.[5] One possible explanation for this discrepancy is the variable makeup of the RRT at different institutions. At our medical center, the RRT is comprised of a critical care nurse and respiratory therapist, whereas at other institutions, the RRT may be led by a resident, fellow, attending hospitalist, or intensivist, any of whom might supersede the primary resident once the RRT is engaged.

In our study, the perceived educational benefit of the RRT was most pronounced with interns. Interns likely derive incrementally greater benefit from each encounter with an acutely decompensating patient than do senior residents, whether the RRT is present or not. Observing the actions of seasoned nurses and respiratory therapists may demonstrate new tools for interns to use in their management of such situations; for example, the RRT may suggest different modes of oxygen delivery or new diagnostic tests. The RRT also likely helps interns navigate the hospital system by assisting with decisions around escalation of care and serving as a liaison to ICU staff.

Our data also have implications for resident perceptions of clinical autonomy. Interns, far less experienced caring for unstable patients than upper‐level residents, expressed more concern about the RRT stripping them of opportunities to do so and about feeling less prepared to handle clinically deteriorating patients. Part of this perception may be due to interns feeling less comfortable taking charge of a patient's care in the presence of an experienced critical care nurse and respiratory therapist, both for reasons related to clinical experience and to a cultural hierarchy that often places the intern at the bottom of the authority spectrum. In addition, when the RRT is called on an intern's patient, the senior resident may accompany the intern to the bedside and guide the intern on his or her approach to the situation; in some cases, the senior resident may take charge, leaving the intern feeling less autonomous.

If training sessions could be developed to address not only clinical decision making, but also multidisciplinary team interactions and roles in the acute care setting, this may mitigate interns' concerns. Such curricula could also enhance residents' experience in interprofessional care, an aspect of clinical training that has become increasingly important in the age of limited duty hours and higher volume, and higher acuity inpatient censuses. An RRT model, like a code blue model, could be used in simulation‐based training to increase both comfort with use of the RRT and efficiency of the RRTresidentnurse team. Although our study did not address specifically residents' perceptions of multidisciplinary teams, this could be a promising area for further study.

For surgical residents, additional factors are likely at play. Surgical residents spend significant time in the operating room, reducing time present at the bedside and hindering the ability to respond swiftly when an RRT is called on their patient. This could cause surgical residents to feel less involved in the care of that patientsupported by our finding that fewer surgical residents felt able to collaborate with the RRTand also to derive less educational benefit and clinical satisfaction from the experience. Differences between medical and surgical postgraduate training also likely play a role, manifest by varying clinical roles and duration of training, and as such it may not be appropriate to draw direct comparisons between respective postgraduate year levels. In addition, differences in patients' medical complexity, varying allegiance to the traditional hierarchy of medical providers, and degree of familiarity with the RRT itself may impact surgical residents' comfort with the RRT.

Limitations of our study include that it was conducted at a single site and addressed a specific population of residents at our tertiary academic center. Though we achieved an excellent response rate, our subspecialty sample sizes were too small to allow for individual comparisons among those groups. Conducting a larger study at multiple institutions where the makeup of the RRT differs could provide further insight into how different clinical environments and different RRT models impact resident perceptions. Finally, we allowed each respondent to interpret both educational benefit and clinical autonomy in the context of their own level of training and clinical practice rather than providing strict definitions of these terms. There is no standardized definition of autonomy in the context of resident clinical practice, and we did not measure direct educational outcomes. Our study design therefore allowed only for measurement of perceptions of these concepts. Measurement of actual educational value of the RRTfor example, through direct clinical observation or by incorporating the RRT experience into an entrustable professional activitywould provide more quantitative evidence of the RRT's utility for our resident population. Future study in this area would help to support the development and ongoing assessment of RRT‐based curricula moving forward.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that resident physicians have a strongly favorable opinion of the RRT at our institution. Future studies should aim to quantify the educational benefit of RRTs for residents and identify areas for curricular development to enhance resident education as RRTs become more pervasive.

Files
References
  1. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Rapid response teams. Available at: http://www.ihi.org/topics/rapidresponseteams. Accessed May 5, 2014.
  2. Chan PS, Jain R, Nallmothu BK, Berg RA, Sasson C. Rapid response teams: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):1826.
  3. Devita MA, Bellomo R, Hillman K, et al. Findings of the first consensus conference on medical emergency teams. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(9):24632478.
  4. Winters BD, Pham JC, Hunt EA, Guallar E, Berenholtz S, Pronovost PJ. Rapid response systems: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5):12381243.
  5. Benin AL, Borgstrom CP, Jenq GY, Roumanis SA, Horwitz LI. Defining impact of a rapid response team: qualitative study with nurses, physicians and hospital administrators. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(5):391398.
  6. Leach LS, Mayo A, O'Rourke M. How RNs rescue patients: a qualitative study of RNs' perceived involvement in rapid response teams. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(5):e13.
  7. Metcalf R, Scott S, Ridgway M, Gibson D. Rapid response team approach to staff satisfaction. Orthop Nurs. 2008;27(5):266271; quiz 272–273.
  8. Salamonson Y, Heere B, Everett B, Davidson P. Voices from the floor: nurses' perceptions of the medical emergency team. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2006;22(3):138143.
  9. Shapiro SE, Donaldson NE, Scott MB. Rapid response teams seen through the eyes of the nurse. Am J Nurs. 2010;110(6):2834; quiz 35–36.
  10. Shearer B, Marshall S, Buist MD, et al. What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi‐campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(7):569575.
  11. Sarani B, Sonnad S, Bergey MR, et al. Resident and RN perceptions of the impact of a medical emergency team on education and patient safety in an academic medical center. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(12):30913096.
  12. Marshall SD, Kitto S, Shearer W, et al. Why don't hospital staff activate the rapid response system (RRS)? How frequently is it needed and can the process be improved? Implement Sci. 2011;6:39.
  13. Peebles E, Subbe CP, Hughes P, Gemmell L. Timing and teamwork–an observational pilot study of patients referred to a rapid response team with the aim of identifying factors amenable to re‐design of a rapid response system. Resuscitation. 2012;83(6):782787.
Article PDF
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(1)
Page Number
8-12
Sections
Files
Files
Article PDF
Article PDF

Rapid response teams (RRTs) have been promoted by patient safety and quality‐improvement organizations as a strategy to reduce preventable in‐hospital deaths.[1] To date, critical analysis of RRTs has focused primarily on their impact on quality‐of‐care metrics.[2, 3, 4] Comparatively few studies have examined the cultural and educational impact of RRTs, particularly at academic medical centers, and those that do exist have focused almost exclusively on perceptions of nurses rather than resident physicians.[5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

Although a prior study found that internal medicine and general surgery residents believed that RRTs improved patient safety, they were largely ambivalent about the RRT's impact on education and training.[11] To date, there has been no focused assessment of resident physician impressions of an RRT across years of training and medical specialty to inform the use of this multidisciplinary team as a component of their residency education.

We sought to determine whether resident physicians at a tertiary care academic medical center perceive educational benefit from collaboration with the RRT and whether they feel that the RRT adversely affects clinical autonomy.

METHODS

The Hospital

Moffitt‐Long Hospital, the tertiary academic medical center of the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), is a 600‐bed acute care hospital that provides comprehensive critical care services and serves as a major referral center in northern California. There are roughly 5000 admissions to the hospital annually. At the time the study was conducted, there were approximately 200 RRT calls per 1000 adult hospital discharges.

The Rapid Response Team

The RRT is called to assess, triage, and treat patients who have experienced a decline in their clinical status short of a cardiopulmonary arrest. The RRT has been operational at UCSF since June 1, 2007, and is composed of a dedicated critical care nurse and respiratory therapist available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The RRT can be activated by any concerned staff member based on vital sign abnormalities, decreased urine output, changes in mental status, or any significant concern about the trajectory of the patient's clinical course.

When the RRT is called on a given patient, the patient's primary physician (at our institution, a resident) is also called to the bedside and works alongside the RRT to address the patient's acute clinical needs. The primary physician, bedside nurse, and RRT discuss the plan of care for the patient, including clinical evaluation, management, and the need for additional monitoring or a transition to a higher level of care. Residents at our institution receive no formal instruction regarding the role of the RRT or curriculum on interfacing with the RRT, and they do not serve as members of the RRT as part of a clinical rotation.

The Survey Process

Study subjects were asked via e‐mail to participate in a brief online survey. Subjects were offered the opportunity to win a $100 gift certificate in return for their participation. Weekly e‐mail reminders were sent for a period of 3 months or until a given subject had completed the survey. The survey was administered over a 3‐month period, from March through May, to allow time for residents to work with the RRT during the academic year. The Committee on Human Research at the University of California San Francisco Medical Center approved the study.

Target Population

All residents in specialties that involved direct patient care and the potential to use the adult RRT were included in the study. This included residents in the fields of internal medicine, neurology, general surgery, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, urology, and otolaryngology (Table 1). Residents in pediatrics and obstetrics and gynecology were excluded, as emergencies in their patients are addressed by a pediatric RRT and an obstetric anesthesiologist, respectively. Residents in anesthesiology were excluded as they do not care for nonintensive care unit (ICU) patients as part of the primary team and are not involved in RRT encounters.

Demographics of Survey Respondents (N=236)
DemographicNo. (%)
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: RRT, rapid response team; SD, standard deviation.

  • Where data do not equal 100%, this is due to missing data or rounding. Table does not include 10 respondents who had never cared for a patient for whom the RRT was activated.

Medical specialty 
Internal medicine145 (61.4)
Neurology18 (7.6)
General surgery31 (13.1)
Orthopedic surgery17 (7.2)
Neurosurgery4 (1.7)
Plastic surgery2 (0.8)
Urology9 (3.8)
Otolaryngology10 (4.2)
Years of postgraduate trainingAverage 2.34 (SD 1.41)
183 (35.2)
260 (25.4)
355 (23.3)
420 (8.5)
58 (3.4)
65 (2.1)
75 (2.1)
Gender 
Male133 (56.4)
Female102 (43.2)
Had exposure to RRT during training 
Yes106 (44.9)
No127 (53.8)
Had previously initiated a call to the RRT 
Yes106 (44.9)
No128 (54.2)

Survey Design

The resident survey contained 20 RRT‐related items and 7 demographic and practice items. Responses for RRT‐related questions utilized a 5‐point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The survey was piloted prior to administration to check comprehension and interpretation by physicians with experience in survey writing (for the full survey, see Supporting Information, Appendix, in the online version of this article).

Survey Objectives

The survey was designed to capture the experiences of residents who had cared for a patient for whom the RRT had been activated. Data collected included residents' perceptions of the impact of the RRT on their residency education and clinical autonomy, the quality of care provided, patient safety, and hospital‐wide culture. Potential barriers to use of the RRT were also examined.

Outcomes

The study's primary outcomes included the perceived educational benefit of the RRT and its perceived impact on clinical autonomy. Secondary outcomes included the effect of years of training and resident specialty on both the perceived educational benefit and impact on clinical autonomy among our study group.

Statistical Analysis

Responses to each survey item were described for each specialty, and subgroup analysis was conducted. For years of training, that item was dichotomized into either 1 year (henceforth referred to as interns) or greater than 1 year (henceforth referred to as upper‐level residents). Resident specialty was dichotomized into medical fields (internal medicine and neurology) or surgical fields. For statistical analysis, agreement statements were collapsed to either disagree (strongly disagree/disagree), neutral, or agree (strongly agree/agree). The influence of years of resident training and resident specialty was assessed for all items in the survey using 2 or Fisher exact tests as appropriate for the 3 agreement categories. Analysis was conducted using SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

RESULTS

There were 246 responses to the survey of a possible 342, yielding a response rate of 72% (Table 2). Ten respondents stated that they had never cared for a patient where the RRT had been activated. Given their lack of exposure to the RRT, these respondents were excluded from the analysis, yielding a final sample size of 236. The demographic and clinical practice characteristics of respondents are shown in Table 1.

Resident Perceptions of the RRT (N=236)
The residentStrongly Disagree/Disagree, n (%)Neutral, n (%)Agree/ Strongly Agree, n (%)
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: RRT, rapid response team.

  • Where data do not equal 100%, this is due to missing data or rounding. Includes only data for respondents who had cared for a patient that required RRT activation.

Is comfortable managing the unstable patient without the RRT104 (44.1)64 (27.1)66 (28.0)
And RRT work together to make treatment decisions10 (4.2)13 (5.5)208 (88.1)
Believes there are fewer opportunities to care for unstable floor patients due to the RRT188 (79.7)26 (11.0)17 (7.2)
Feels less prepared to care for unstable patients due to the RRT201 (85.2)22 (9.3)13 (5.5)
Feels that working with the RRT creates a valuable educational experience9 (3.8)39 (16.5)184 (78.0)
Feels that nurses caring for the unstable patient should always contact them prior to contacting the RRT123 (52.1)33 (14.0)76 (32.2)
Would be unhappy with nurses calling RRT prior to contacting them141 (59.7)44 (18.6)51 (21.6)
Perceives that the presence of RRT decreases residents' autonomy179 (75.8)25 (10.6)28 (11.9)

Demographics and Primary Outcomes

Interns comprised 83 (35%) of the respondents; the average time in postgraduate training was 2.34 years (standard deviation=1.41). Of respondents, 163 (69%) were in medical fields, and 73 (31%) were in surgical fields. Overall responses to the survey are shown in Table 2, and subgroup analysis is shown in Table 3.

Perceptions of the RRT Based on Years of Training and Specialty
The resident1 Year, n=83, n (%)>1 Year, n=153, n (%)P ValueMedical, n=163, n (%)Surgical, n=73, n (%)P Value
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: RRT, rapid response team.

  • Where data do not equal 100%, this is due to missing data or rounding.

Is comfortable managing the unstable patient without the RRT  0.01  <0.01
Strongly disagree/disagree39 (47.6)65 (42.8) 67 (41.6)37 (50.7) 
Neutral29 (35.4)35 (23.0) 56 (34.8)8 (11.0) 
Agree/strongly agree14 (17.1)52 (34.2) 38 (23.6)28 (38.4) 
And RRT work together to make treatment decisions  0.61  0.04
Strongly disagree/disagree2 (2.4)8 (5.4) 4 (2.5)6 (8.7) 
Neutral5 (6.1)8 (5.4) 7 (4.3)6 (8.7) 
Agree/strongly agree75 (91.5)137 (89.3) 151 (93.2)57 (82.6) 
Believes there are fewer opportunities to care for unstable floor patients due to the RRT  0.05  0.04
Strongly disagree/disagree59 (72.8)129 (86.0) 136 (85.5)52 (72.2) 
Neutral13 (16.0)13 (8.7) 15 (9.4)11 (15.3) 
Agree/strongly agree9 (11.1)8 (5.3) 8 (5.0)9 (12.5) 
Feels less prepared to care for unstable patients due to the RRT  <0.01  0.79
Strongly disagree/disagree62 (74.7)139 (90.8) 140 (85.9)61 (83.6) 
Neutral14 (16.9)8 (5.2) 15 (9.2)7 (9.6) 
Agree/Strongly agree7 (8.4)6 (3.9) 8 (4.9)5 (6.8) 
Feels working with the RRT is a valuable educational experience  0.61  0.01
Strongly disagree/disagree2 (2.4)7 (4.7) 2 (1.2)7 (9.9) 
Neutral12 (14.6)27 (18.0) 25 (15.5)14 (19.7) 
Agree/strongly agree68 (82.9)116 (77.3) 134 (83.2)50 (70.4) 
Feels nurses caring for unstable patients should always contact the resident prior to contacting the RRT  0.49  <0.01
Strongly disagree/disagree47 (57.3)76 (50.7) 97 (60.2)26 (36.6) 
Neutral9 (11.0)24 (16.0) 26 (16.1)7 (9.9) 
Agree/strongly agree26 (31.7)50 (33.3) 38 (23.6)38 (53.5) 
Would be unhappy with nurses calling RRT prior to contacting them  0.81  <0.01
Strongly disagree/disagree51 (61.4)90 (58.8) 109 (66.9)32 (43.8) 
Neutral16 (19.3)28 (18.3) 30 (18.4)14 (19.2) 
Agree/strongly agree16 (19.3)35 (22.9) 24 (14.7)27 (37.0) 
Perceives that the presence of the RRT decreases autonomy as a physician  0.95  0.18
Strongly disagree/disagree63 (77.8)116 (76.8) 127 (79.9)52 (71.2) 
Neutral9 (11.1)16 (10.6) 17 (10.7)8 (11.0) 
Agree/strongly agree9 (11.1)19 (12.6) 15 (9.4)13 (17.8) 

Effect of the RRT on Resident Education

Of all residents, 66 (28%) agreed that they felt comfortable managing an unstable patient without the assistance of the RRT. Surgical residents felt more comfortable managing an unstable patient alone (38%) compared medical residents (24%) (P<0.01). Interns felt less comfortable caring for unstable patients without the RRT's assistance (17%) compared with upper‐level residents (34%) (P=0.01).

Residents overall disagreed with the statement that the RRT left them feeling less prepared to care for unstable patients (n=201; 85%). More upper‐level residents disagreed with this assertion (91%) compared with interns (75%) (P<0.01). Responses to this question did not differ significantly between medical and surgical residents.

Upper‐level residents were more likely to disagree with the statement that the RRT resulted in fewer opportunities to care for unstable patients (n=129; 86%) compared with interns (n=59; 73%) (P=0.05). Medical residents were also more likely to disagree with this statement (n=136; 86%) compared with surgical residents (n=52; 72%) (P=0.04).

With respect to residents' overall impressions of the educational value of the RRT, 68 (83%) interns and 116 (77%) upper‐level residents agreed that it provided a valuable educational experience (P=0.61). Medical and surgical residents differed in this regard, with 134 (83%) medical residents and 50 (70%) surgical residents agreeing that the RRT provided a valuable educational experience (P=0.01).

Effect of the RRT on Clinical Autonomy

Of all residents, 123 (52%) disagreed that the bedside nurse should always contact the primary resident prior to calling the RRT; 76 (32%) agreed with this statement. Medicine residents were more likely to disagree with this approach (n=97; 60%) than were surgical residents (n=26; 36%) (P<0.01). There was no difference between interns and upper‐level residents in response to this question. Most of those who disagreed with this statement were medical residents, whereas most surgical residents (n=38; 54%) agreed that they should be contacted first (P<0.01).

There were no differences between interns and upper‐level residents with respect to perceptions of the RRT's impact on clinical autonomy: 11% of interns and 13% of residents agreed that the RRT decreased their clinical autonomy as a physician. There was no significant difference between medical and surgical residents' responses to this question.

The majority of residents (n=208; 88%) agreed that they and the RRT work together to make treatment decisions for patients. This was true regardless of year of training (P=0.61), but it was expressed more often among medical residents than surgical residents (n=151, 93% vs n=57, 83%; P=0.04).

DISCUSSION

Most studies examining the educational and cultural impact of RRTs exist in the nursing literature. These studies demonstrate that medical and surgical nurses are often reluctant to call the RRT for fear of criticism by the patient's physician.[5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13] In contrast, our data demonstrate that resident physicians across all levels of training and specialties have a positive view of the RRT and its role in patient care. The data support our hypothesis that although most residents perceive educational benefit from their interactions with the RRT, this perception is greater for less‐experienced residents and for those residents who routinely provide care for critically ill patients and serve as code team leaders. In addition, a minority of residents, irrespective of years of training or medical specialty, felt that the RRT negatively impacted their clinical autonomy.

Our data have several important implications. First, although over half of the residents surveyed had not been exposed to RRTs during medical school, and despite having no formal training on the role of the RRT during residency, most residents identified their interactions with the RRT as potential learning opportunities. This finding differs from that of Benin and colleagues, who suggested that RRTs might negatively impact residents' educational development and decrease opportunities for high‐stakes clinical reasoning by allowing the clinical decision‐making process to be driven by the RRT staff rather than the resident.[5] One possible explanation for this discrepancy is the variable makeup of the RRT at different institutions. At our medical center, the RRT is comprised of a critical care nurse and respiratory therapist, whereas at other institutions, the RRT may be led by a resident, fellow, attending hospitalist, or intensivist, any of whom might supersede the primary resident once the RRT is engaged.

In our study, the perceived educational benefit of the RRT was most pronounced with interns. Interns likely derive incrementally greater benefit from each encounter with an acutely decompensating patient than do senior residents, whether the RRT is present or not. Observing the actions of seasoned nurses and respiratory therapists may demonstrate new tools for interns to use in their management of such situations; for example, the RRT may suggest different modes of oxygen delivery or new diagnostic tests. The RRT also likely helps interns navigate the hospital system by assisting with decisions around escalation of care and serving as a liaison to ICU staff.

Our data also have implications for resident perceptions of clinical autonomy. Interns, far less experienced caring for unstable patients than upper‐level residents, expressed more concern about the RRT stripping them of opportunities to do so and about feeling less prepared to handle clinically deteriorating patients. Part of this perception may be due to interns feeling less comfortable taking charge of a patient's care in the presence of an experienced critical care nurse and respiratory therapist, both for reasons related to clinical experience and to a cultural hierarchy that often places the intern at the bottom of the authority spectrum. In addition, when the RRT is called on an intern's patient, the senior resident may accompany the intern to the bedside and guide the intern on his or her approach to the situation; in some cases, the senior resident may take charge, leaving the intern feeling less autonomous.

If training sessions could be developed to address not only clinical decision making, but also multidisciplinary team interactions and roles in the acute care setting, this may mitigate interns' concerns. Such curricula could also enhance residents' experience in interprofessional care, an aspect of clinical training that has become increasingly important in the age of limited duty hours and higher volume, and higher acuity inpatient censuses. An RRT model, like a code blue model, could be used in simulation‐based training to increase both comfort with use of the RRT and efficiency of the RRTresidentnurse team. Although our study did not address specifically residents' perceptions of multidisciplinary teams, this could be a promising area for further study.

For surgical residents, additional factors are likely at play. Surgical residents spend significant time in the operating room, reducing time present at the bedside and hindering the ability to respond swiftly when an RRT is called on their patient. This could cause surgical residents to feel less involved in the care of that patientsupported by our finding that fewer surgical residents felt able to collaborate with the RRTand also to derive less educational benefit and clinical satisfaction from the experience. Differences between medical and surgical postgraduate training also likely play a role, manifest by varying clinical roles and duration of training, and as such it may not be appropriate to draw direct comparisons between respective postgraduate year levels. In addition, differences in patients' medical complexity, varying allegiance to the traditional hierarchy of medical providers, and degree of familiarity with the RRT itself may impact surgical residents' comfort with the RRT.

Limitations of our study include that it was conducted at a single site and addressed a specific population of residents at our tertiary academic center. Though we achieved an excellent response rate, our subspecialty sample sizes were too small to allow for individual comparisons among those groups. Conducting a larger study at multiple institutions where the makeup of the RRT differs could provide further insight into how different clinical environments and different RRT models impact resident perceptions. Finally, we allowed each respondent to interpret both educational benefit and clinical autonomy in the context of their own level of training and clinical practice rather than providing strict definitions of these terms. There is no standardized definition of autonomy in the context of resident clinical practice, and we did not measure direct educational outcomes. Our study design therefore allowed only for measurement of perceptions of these concepts. Measurement of actual educational value of the RRTfor example, through direct clinical observation or by incorporating the RRT experience into an entrustable professional activitywould provide more quantitative evidence of the RRT's utility for our resident population. Future study in this area would help to support the development and ongoing assessment of RRT‐based curricula moving forward.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that resident physicians have a strongly favorable opinion of the RRT at our institution. Future studies should aim to quantify the educational benefit of RRTs for residents and identify areas for curricular development to enhance resident education as RRTs become more pervasive.

Rapid response teams (RRTs) have been promoted by patient safety and quality‐improvement organizations as a strategy to reduce preventable in‐hospital deaths.[1] To date, critical analysis of RRTs has focused primarily on their impact on quality‐of‐care metrics.[2, 3, 4] Comparatively few studies have examined the cultural and educational impact of RRTs, particularly at academic medical centers, and those that do exist have focused almost exclusively on perceptions of nurses rather than resident physicians.[5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

Although a prior study found that internal medicine and general surgery residents believed that RRTs improved patient safety, they were largely ambivalent about the RRT's impact on education and training.[11] To date, there has been no focused assessment of resident physician impressions of an RRT across years of training and medical specialty to inform the use of this multidisciplinary team as a component of their residency education.

We sought to determine whether resident physicians at a tertiary care academic medical center perceive educational benefit from collaboration with the RRT and whether they feel that the RRT adversely affects clinical autonomy.

METHODS

The Hospital

Moffitt‐Long Hospital, the tertiary academic medical center of the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), is a 600‐bed acute care hospital that provides comprehensive critical care services and serves as a major referral center in northern California. There are roughly 5000 admissions to the hospital annually. At the time the study was conducted, there were approximately 200 RRT calls per 1000 adult hospital discharges.

The Rapid Response Team

The RRT is called to assess, triage, and treat patients who have experienced a decline in their clinical status short of a cardiopulmonary arrest. The RRT has been operational at UCSF since June 1, 2007, and is composed of a dedicated critical care nurse and respiratory therapist available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The RRT can be activated by any concerned staff member based on vital sign abnormalities, decreased urine output, changes in mental status, or any significant concern about the trajectory of the patient's clinical course.

When the RRT is called on a given patient, the patient's primary physician (at our institution, a resident) is also called to the bedside and works alongside the RRT to address the patient's acute clinical needs. The primary physician, bedside nurse, and RRT discuss the plan of care for the patient, including clinical evaluation, management, and the need for additional monitoring or a transition to a higher level of care. Residents at our institution receive no formal instruction regarding the role of the RRT or curriculum on interfacing with the RRT, and they do not serve as members of the RRT as part of a clinical rotation.

The Survey Process

Study subjects were asked via e‐mail to participate in a brief online survey. Subjects were offered the opportunity to win a $100 gift certificate in return for their participation. Weekly e‐mail reminders were sent for a period of 3 months or until a given subject had completed the survey. The survey was administered over a 3‐month period, from March through May, to allow time for residents to work with the RRT during the academic year. The Committee on Human Research at the University of California San Francisco Medical Center approved the study.

Target Population

All residents in specialties that involved direct patient care and the potential to use the adult RRT were included in the study. This included residents in the fields of internal medicine, neurology, general surgery, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, urology, and otolaryngology (Table 1). Residents in pediatrics and obstetrics and gynecology were excluded, as emergencies in their patients are addressed by a pediatric RRT and an obstetric anesthesiologist, respectively. Residents in anesthesiology were excluded as they do not care for nonintensive care unit (ICU) patients as part of the primary team and are not involved in RRT encounters.

Demographics of Survey Respondents (N=236)
DemographicNo. (%)
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: RRT, rapid response team; SD, standard deviation.

  • Where data do not equal 100%, this is due to missing data or rounding. Table does not include 10 respondents who had never cared for a patient for whom the RRT was activated.

Medical specialty 
Internal medicine145 (61.4)
Neurology18 (7.6)
General surgery31 (13.1)
Orthopedic surgery17 (7.2)
Neurosurgery4 (1.7)
Plastic surgery2 (0.8)
Urology9 (3.8)
Otolaryngology10 (4.2)
Years of postgraduate trainingAverage 2.34 (SD 1.41)
183 (35.2)
260 (25.4)
355 (23.3)
420 (8.5)
58 (3.4)
65 (2.1)
75 (2.1)
Gender 
Male133 (56.4)
Female102 (43.2)
Had exposure to RRT during training 
Yes106 (44.9)
No127 (53.8)
Had previously initiated a call to the RRT 
Yes106 (44.9)
No128 (54.2)

Survey Design

The resident survey contained 20 RRT‐related items and 7 demographic and practice items. Responses for RRT‐related questions utilized a 5‐point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The survey was piloted prior to administration to check comprehension and interpretation by physicians with experience in survey writing (for the full survey, see Supporting Information, Appendix, in the online version of this article).

Survey Objectives

The survey was designed to capture the experiences of residents who had cared for a patient for whom the RRT had been activated. Data collected included residents' perceptions of the impact of the RRT on their residency education and clinical autonomy, the quality of care provided, patient safety, and hospital‐wide culture. Potential barriers to use of the RRT were also examined.

Outcomes

The study's primary outcomes included the perceived educational benefit of the RRT and its perceived impact on clinical autonomy. Secondary outcomes included the effect of years of training and resident specialty on both the perceived educational benefit and impact on clinical autonomy among our study group.

Statistical Analysis

Responses to each survey item were described for each specialty, and subgroup analysis was conducted. For years of training, that item was dichotomized into either 1 year (henceforth referred to as interns) or greater than 1 year (henceforth referred to as upper‐level residents). Resident specialty was dichotomized into medical fields (internal medicine and neurology) or surgical fields. For statistical analysis, agreement statements were collapsed to either disagree (strongly disagree/disagree), neutral, or agree (strongly agree/agree). The influence of years of resident training and resident specialty was assessed for all items in the survey using 2 or Fisher exact tests as appropriate for the 3 agreement categories. Analysis was conducted using SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

RESULTS

There were 246 responses to the survey of a possible 342, yielding a response rate of 72% (Table 2). Ten respondents stated that they had never cared for a patient where the RRT had been activated. Given their lack of exposure to the RRT, these respondents were excluded from the analysis, yielding a final sample size of 236. The demographic and clinical practice characteristics of respondents are shown in Table 1.

Resident Perceptions of the RRT (N=236)
The residentStrongly Disagree/Disagree, n (%)Neutral, n (%)Agree/ Strongly Agree, n (%)
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: RRT, rapid response team.

  • Where data do not equal 100%, this is due to missing data or rounding. Includes only data for respondents who had cared for a patient that required RRT activation.

Is comfortable managing the unstable patient without the RRT104 (44.1)64 (27.1)66 (28.0)
And RRT work together to make treatment decisions10 (4.2)13 (5.5)208 (88.1)
Believes there are fewer opportunities to care for unstable floor patients due to the RRT188 (79.7)26 (11.0)17 (7.2)
Feels less prepared to care for unstable patients due to the RRT201 (85.2)22 (9.3)13 (5.5)
Feels that working with the RRT creates a valuable educational experience9 (3.8)39 (16.5)184 (78.0)
Feels that nurses caring for the unstable patient should always contact them prior to contacting the RRT123 (52.1)33 (14.0)76 (32.2)
Would be unhappy with nurses calling RRT prior to contacting them141 (59.7)44 (18.6)51 (21.6)
Perceives that the presence of RRT decreases residents' autonomy179 (75.8)25 (10.6)28 (11.9)

Demographics and Primary Outcomes

Interns comprised 83 (35%) of the respondents; the average time in postgraduate training was 2.34 years (standard deviation=1.41). Of respondents, 163 (69%) were in medical fields, and 73 (31%) were in surgical fields. Overall responses to the survey are shown in Table 2, and subgroup analysis is shown in Table 3.

Perceptions of the RRT Based on Years of Training and Specialty
The resident1 Year, n=83, n (%)>1 Year, n=153, n (%)P ValueMedical, n=163, n (%)Surgical, n=73, n (%)P Value
  • NOTE: Abbreviations: RRT, rapid response team.

  • Where data do not equal 100%, this is due to missing data or rounding.

Is comfortable managing the unstable patient without the RRT  0.01  <0.01
Strongly disagree/disagree39 (47.6)65 (42.8) 67 (41.6)37 (50.7) 
Neutral29 (35.4)35 (23.0) 56 (34.8)8 (11.0) 
Agree/strongly agree14 (17.1)52 (34.2) 38 (23.6)28 (38.4) 
And RRT work together to make treatment decisions  0.61  0.04
Strongly disagree/disagree2 (2.4)8 (5.4) 4 (2.5)6 (8.7) 
Neutral5 (6.1)8 (5.4) 7 (4.3)6 (8.7) 
Agree/strongly agree75 (91.5)137 (89.3) 151 (93.2)57 (82.6) 
Believes there are fewer opportunities to care for unstable floor patients due to the RRT  0.05  0.04
Strongly disagree/disagree59 (72.8)129 (86.0) 136 (85.5)52 (72.2) 
Neutral13 (16.0)13 (8.7) 15 (9.4)11 (15.3) 
Agree/strongly agree9 (11.1)8 (5.3) 8 (5.0)9 (12.5) 
Feels less prepared to care for unstable patients due to the RRT  <0.01  0.79
Strongly disagree/disagree62 (74.7)139 (90.8) 140 (85.9)61 (83.6) 
Neutral14 (16.9)8 (5.2) 15 (9.2)7 (9.6) 
Agree/Strongly agree7 (8.4)6 (3.9) 8 (4.9)5 (6.8) 
Feels working with the RRT is a valuable educational experience  0.61  0.01
Strongly disagree/disagree2 (2.4)7 (4.7) 2 (1.2)7 (9.9) 
Neutral12 (14.6)27 (18.0) 25 (15.5)14 (19.7) 
Agree/strongly agree68 (82.9)116 (77.3) 134 (83.2)50 (70.4) 
Feels nurses caring for unstable patients should always contact the resident prior to contacting the RRT  0.49  <0.01
Strongly disagree/disagree47 (57.3)76 (50.7) 97 (60.2)26 (36.6) 
Neutral9 (11.0)24 (16.0) 26 (16.1)7 (9.9) 
Agree/strongly agree26 (31.7)50 (33.3) 38 (23.6)38 (53.5) 
Would be unhappy with nurses calling RRT prior to contacting them  0.81  <0.01
Strongly disagree/disagree51 (61.4)90 (58.8) 109 (66.9)32 (43.8) 
Neutral16 (19.3)28 (18.3) 30 (18.4)14 (19.2) 
Agree/strongly agree16 (19.3)35 (22.9) 24 (14.7)27 (37.0) 
Perceives that the presence of the RRT decreases autonomy as a physician  0.95  0.18
Strongly disagree/disagree63 (77.8)116 (76.8) 127 (79.9)52 (71.2) 
Neutral9 (11.1)16 (10.6) 17 (10.7)8 (11.0) 
Agree/strongly agree9 (11.1)19 (12.6) 15 (9.4)13 (17.8) 

Effect of the RRT on Resident Education

Of all residents, 66 (28%) agreed that they felt comfortable managing an unstable patient without the assistance of the RRT. Surgical residents felt more comfortable managing an unstable patient alone (38%) compared medical residents (24%) (P<0.01). Interns felt less comfortable caring for unstable patients without the RRT's assistance (17%) compared with upper‐level residents (34%) (P=0.01).

Residents overall disagreed with the statement that the RRT left them feeling less prepared to care for unstable patients (n=201; 85%). More upper‐level residents disagreed with this assertion (91%) compared with interns (75%) (P<0.01). Responses to this question did not differ significantly between medical and surgical residents.

Upper‐level residents were more likely to disagree with the statement that the RRT resulted in fewer opportunities to care for unstable patients (n=129; 86%) compared with interns (n=59; 73%) (P=0.05). Medical residents were also more likely to disagree with this statement (n=136; 86%) compared with surgical residents (n=52; 72%) (P=0.04).

With respect to residents' overall impressions of the educational value of the RRT, 68 (83%) interns and 116 (77%) upper‐level residents agreed that it provided a valuable educational experience (P=0.61). Medical and surgical residents differed in this regard, with 134 (83%) medical residents and 50 (70%) surgical residents agreeing that the RRT provided a valuable educational experience (P=0.01).

Effect of the RRT on Clinical Autonomy

Of all residents, 123 (52%) disagreed that the bedside nurse should always contact the primary resident prior to calling the RRT; 76 (32%) agreed with this statement. Medicine residents were more likely to disagree with this approach (n=97; 60%) than were surgical residents (n=26; 36%) (P<0.01). There was no difference between interns and upper‐level residents in response to this question. Most of those who disagreed with this statement were medical residents, whereas most surgical residents (n=38; 54%) agreed that they should be contacted first (P<0.01).

There were no differences between interns and upper‐level residents with respect to perceptions of the RRT's impact on clinical autonomy: 11% of interns and 13% of residents agreed that the RRT decreased their clinical autonomy as a physician. There was no significant difference between medical and surgical residents' responses to this question.

The majority of residents (n=208; 88%) agreed that they and the RRT work together to make treatment decisions for patients. This was true regardless of year of training (P=0.61), but it was expressed more often among medical residents than surgical residents (n=151, 93% vs n=57, 83%; P=0.04).

DISCUSSION

Most studies examining the educational and cultural impact of RRTs exist in the nursing literature. These studies demonstrate that medical and surgical nurses are often reluctant to call the RRT for fear of criticism by the patient's physician.[5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13] In contrast, our data demonstrate that resident physicians across all levels of training and specialties have a positive view of the RRT and its role in patient care. The data support our hypothesis that although most residents perceive educational benefit from their interactions with the RRT, this perception is greater for less‐experienced residents and for those residents who routinely provide care for critically ill patients and serve as code team leaders. In addition, a minority of residents, irrespective of years of training or medical specialty, felt that the RRT negatively impacted their clinical autonomy.

Our data have several important implications. First, although over half of the residents surveyed had not been exposed to RRTs during medical school, and despite having no formal training on the role of the RRT during residency, most residents identified their interactions with the RRT as potential learning opportunities. This finding differs from that of Benin and colleagues, who suggested that RRTs might negatively impact residents' educational development and decrease opportunities for high‐stakes clinical reasoning by allowing the clinical decision‐making process to be driven by the RRT staff rather than the resident.[5] One possible explanation for this discrepancy is the variable makeup of the RRT at different institutions. At our medical center, the RRT is comprised of a critical care nurse and respiratory therapist, whereas at other institutions, the RRT may be led by a resident, fellow, attending hospitalist, or intensivist, any of whom might supersede the primary resident once the RRT is engaged.

In our study, the perceived educational benefit of the RRT was most pronounced with interns. Interns likely derive incrementally greater benefit from each encounter with an acutely decompensating patient than do senior residents, whether the RRT is present or not. Observing the actions of seasoned nurses and respiratory therapists may demonstrate new tools for interns to use in their management of such situations; for example, the RRT may suggest different modes of oxygen delivery or new diagnostic tests. The RRT also likely helps interns navigate the hospital system by assisting with decisions around escalation of care and serving as a liaison to ICU staff.

Our data also have implications for resident perceptions of clinical autonomy. Interns, far less experienced caring for unstable patients than upper‐level residents, expressed more concern about the RRT stripping them of opportunities to do so and about feeling less prepared to handle clinically deteriorating patients. Part of this perception may be due to interns feeling less comfortable taking charge of a patient's care in the presence of an experienced critical care nurse and respiratory therapist, both for reasons related to clinical experience and to a cultural hierarchy that often places the intern at the bottom of the authority spectrum. In addition, when the RRT is called on an intern's patient, the senior resident may accompany the intern to the bedside and guide the intern on his or her approach to the situation; in some cases, the senior resident may take charge, leaving the intern feeling less autonomous.

If training sessions could be developed to address not only clinical decision making, but also multidisciplinary team interactions and roles in the acute care setting, this may mitigate interns' concerns. Such curricula could also enhance residents' experience in interprofessional care, an aspect of clinical training that has become increasingly important in the age of limited duty hours and higher volume, and higher acuity inpatient censuses. An RRT model, like a code blue model, could be used in simulation‐based training to increase both comfort with use of the RRT and efficiency of the RRTresidentnurse team. Although our study did not address specifically residents' perceptions of multidisciplinary teams, this could be a promising area for further study.

For surgical residents, additional factors are likely at play. Surgical residents spend significant time in the operating room, reducing time present at the bedside and hindering the ability to respond swiftly when an RRT is called on their patient. This could cause surgical residents to feel less involved in the care of that patientsupported by our finding that fewer surgical residents felt able to collaborate with the RRTand also to derive less educational benefit and clinical satisfaction from the experience. Differences between medical and surgical postgraduate training also likely play a role, manifest by varying clinical roles and duration of training, and as such it may not be appropriate to draw direct comparisons between respective postgraduate year levels. In addition, differences in patients' medical complexity, varying allegiance to the traditional hierarchy of medical providers, and degree of familiarity with the RRT itself may impact surgical residents' comfort with the RRT.

Limitations of our study include that it was conducted at a single site and addressed a specific population of residents at our tertiary academic center. Though we achieved an excellent response rate, our subspecialty sample sizes were too small to allow for individual comparisons among those groups. Conducting a larger study at multiple institutions where the makeup of the RRT differs could provide further insight into how different clinical environments and different RRT models impact resident perceptions. Finally, we allowed each respondent to interpret both educational benefit and clinical autonomy in the context of their own level of training and clinical practice rather than providing strict definitions of these terms. There is no standardized definition of autonomy in the context of resident clinical practice, and we did not measure direct educational outcomes. Our study design therefore allowed only for measurement of perceptions of these concepts. Measurement of actual educational value of the RRTfor example, through direct clinical observation or by incorporating the RRT experience into an entrustable professional activitywould provide more quantitative evidence of the RRT's utility for our resident population. Future study in this area would help to support the development and ongoing assessment of RRT‐based curricula moving forward.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that resident physicians have a strongly favorable opinion of the RRT at our institution. Future studies should aim to quantify the educational benefit of RRTs for residents and identify areas for curricular development to enhance resident education as RRTs become more pervasive.

References
  1. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Rapid response teams. Available at: http://www.ihi.org/topics/rapidresponseteams. Accessed May 5, 2014.
  2. Chan PS, Jain R, Nallmothu BK, Berg RA, Sasson C. Rapid response teams: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):1826.
  3. Devita MA, Bellomo R, Hillman K, et al. Findings of the first consensus conference on medical emergency teams. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(9):24632478.
  4. Winters BD, Pham JC, Hunt EA, Guallar E, Berenholtz S, Pronovost PJ. Rapid response systems: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5):12381243.
  5. Benin AL, Borgstrom CP, Jenq GY, Roumanis SA, Horwitz LI. Defining impact of a rapid response team: qualitative study with nurses, physicians and hospital administrators. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(5):391398.
  6. Leach LS, Mayo A, O'Rourke M. How RNs rescue patients: a qualitative study of RNs' perceived involvement in rapid response teams. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(5):e13.
  7. Metcalf R, Scott S, Ridgway M, Gibson D. Rapid response team approach to staff satisfaction. Orthop Nurs. 2008;27(5):266271; quiz 272–273.
  8. Salamonson Y, Heere B, Everett B, Davidson P. Voices from the floor: nurses' perceptions of the medical emergency team. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2006;22(3):138143.
  9. Shapiro SE, Donaldson NE, Scott MB. Rapid response teams seen through the eyes of the nurse. Am J Nurs. 2010;110(6):2834; quiz 35–36.
  10. Shearer B, Marshall S, Buist MD, et al. What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi‐campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(7):569575.
  11. Sarani B, Sonnad S, Bergey MR, et al. Resident and RN perceptions of the impact of a medical emergency team on education and patient safety in an academic medical center. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(12):30913096.
  12. Marshall SD, Kitto S, Shearer W, et al. Why don't hospital staff activate the rapid response system (RRS)? How frequently is it needed and can the process be improved? Implement Sci. 2011;6:39.
  13. Peebles E, Subbe CP, Hughes P, Gemmell L. Timing and teamwork–an observational pilot study of patients referred to a rapid response team with the aim of identifying factors amenable to re‐design of a rapid response system. Resuscitation. 2012;83(6):782787.
References
  1. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Rapid response teams. Available at: http://www.ihi.org/topics/rapidresponseteams. Accessed May 5, 2014.
  2. Chan PS, Jain R, Nallmothu BK, Berg RA, Sasson C. Rapid response teams: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):1826.
  3. Devita MA, Bellomo R, Hillman K, et al. Findings of the first consensus conference on medical emergency teams. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(9):24632478.
  4. Winters BD, Pham JC, Hunt EA, Guallar E, Berenholtz S, Pronovost PJ. Rapid response systems: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5):12381243.
  5. Benin AL, Borgstrom CP, Jenq GY, Roumanis SA, Horwitz LI. Defining impact of a rapid response team: qualitative study with nurses, physicians and hospital administrators. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(5):391398.
  6. Leach LS, Mayo A, O'Rourke M. How RNs rescue patients: a qualitative study of RNs' perceived involvement in rapid response teams. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(5):e13.
  7. Metcalf R, Scott S, Ridgway M, Gibson D. Rapid response team approach to staff satisfaction. Orthop Nurs. 2008;27(5):266271; quiz 272–273.
  8. Salamonson Y, Heere B, Everett B, Davidson P. Voices from the floor: nurses' perceptions of the medical emergency team. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2006;22(3):138143.
  9. Shapiro SE, Donaldson NE, Scott MB. Rapid response teams seen through the eyes of the nurse. Am J Nurs. 2010;110(6):2834; quiz 35–36.
  10. Shearer B, Marshall S, Buist MD, et al. What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi‐campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(7):569575.
  11. Sarani B, Sonnad S, Bergey MR, et al. Resident and RN perceptions of the impact of a medical emergency team on education and patient safety in an academic medical center. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(12):30913096.
  12. Marshall SD, Kitto S, Shearer W, et al. Why don't hospital staff activate the rapid response system (RRS)? How frequently is it needed and can the process be improved? Implement Sci. 2011;6:39.
  13. Peebles E, Subbe CP, Hughes P, Gemmell L. Timing and teamwork–an observational pilot study of patients referred to a rapid response team with the aim of identifying factors amenable to re‐design of a rapid response system. Resuscitation. 2012;83(6):782787.
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(1)
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 10(1)
Page Number
8-12
Page Number
8-12
Article Type
Display Headline
The effect of a rapid response team on resident perceptions of education and autonomy
Display Headline
The effect of a rapid response team on resident perceptions of education and autonomy
Sections
Article Source

© 2015 Society of Hospital Medicine

Disallow All Ads
Correspondence Location
Address for correspondence and reprint requests: Sumant R. Ranji, MD, UCSF Division of Hospital Medicine, 533 Parnassus Avenue, Box 0131, San Francisco, CA 94143‐0131; Telephone: 415‐514‐9256; Fax: 415‐514‐2094; E‐mail: [email protected]
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media
Media Files

Paclitaxel-Associated Melanonychia

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 01/10/2019 - 13:20
Display Headline
Paclitaxel-Associated Melanonychia

To the Editor:
Taxane-based chemotherapy including paclitaxel and docetaxel is commonly used to treat solid tumor malignancies including lung, breast, ovarian, and bladder cancers.1 Taxanes work by interrupting normal microtubule function by inducing tubulin polymerization and inhibiting microtubule depolymerization, thereby leading to cell cycle arrest at the gap 2 (premitotic) and mitotic phase and the blockade of cell division.2

Cutaneous side effects have been reported with taxane-based therapies, including alopecia, skin rash and erythema, and desquamation of the hands and feet (hand-foot syndrome).3 Nail changes also have been reported to occur in 0% to 44% of treated patients,4 with one study reporting an incidence as high as 50.5%.5 Nail abnormalities that have been described primarily include onycholysis, and less frequently Beau lines, subungual hemorrhagic bullae, subungual hyperkeratosis, splinter hemorrhages, acute paronychia, and pigmentary changes such as nail bed dyschromia. Among the taxanes, nail abnormalities are more commonly seen with docetaxel; few reports address paclitaxel-induced nail changes.4 Onycholysis, diffuse fingernail orange discoloration, Beau lines, subungual distal hyperkeratosis, and brown discoloration of 3 fingernail beds sparing the lunula have been reported with paclitaxel.6-9 We report a unique case of paclitaxel-associated melanonychia.

A 54-year-old black woman with a history of multiple myeloma and breast cancer who was being treated with paclitaxel for breast cancer presented with nail changes including nail darkening since initiating paclitaxel. She was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2010 and received bortezomib, dexamethasone, and an autologous stem cell transplant in August 2011. She never achieved complete remission but had been on lenalidomide with stable disease. She underwent a lumpectomy in December 2012, which revealed intraductal carcinoma with ductal carcinoma in situ that was estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor negative and ERBB2 (formerly HER2) positive. She was started on weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) to complete 12 cycles and trastuzumab (6 mg/kg) every 3 weeks. While on paclitaxel, she developed grade 2 neuropathy of the hands, leading to subsequent dose reduction at week 9. She denied any other changes to her medications. On clinical examination she had diffuse and well-demarcated, brown-black, longitudinal and transverse bands beginning at the proximal nail plate and progressing distally, with onycholysis involving all 20 nails (Figure, A and B). A nail clipping of the right hallux nail was sent for analysis. Pathology results showed evidence of scattered clusters of brown melanin pigment in the nail plate. Periodic acid–Schiff staining revealed numerous yeasts at the nail base but no infiltrating hyphae. Iron stain was negative for hemosiderin. The right index finger was injected with triamcinolone acetonide to treat the onycholysis. Four months after completing the paclitaxel, she began to notice lightening of the nails and improvement of the onycholysis in all nails (Figure, C and D).

 
 

Initial appearance of diffuse, well-demarcated, brown-black, longitudinal and transverse bands beginning at the proximal nail plate and progressing distally, with onycholysis in the nails on the right hand (A) and left hand (B). Four months after completing paclitaxel, the patient began to notice lightening of the nails and improvement of the onycholysis in the nails on the right hand (C) and left hand (D).

The highly proliferating cells that comprise the nail matrix epithelium mature, differentiate, and keratinize to form the nail plate and are susceptible to the antimitotic effects of systemic chemotherapy. As a result, systemic chemotherapies may lead to abnormal nail plate production and keratinization of the nail plate, causing the clinical manifestations of Beau lines, onychomadesis, and leukonychia.10

Melanonychia is the development of melanin pigmentation of the nail plate and is typically caused by matrix melanin deposition through the activation of nail matrix melanocytes. There are 3 patterns of melanonychia: longitudinal, transverse, and diffuse. A single nail plate can involve more than one pattern of melanonychia and several nails may be affected. Longitudinal melanonychia typically develops from the activation of a group of melanocytes in the nail matrix, while diffuse pigmentation arises from diffuse melanocyte activation.11 Longitudinal melanonychia is common in darker-pigmented individuals12 and can be associated with systemic diseases.10 Transverse melanonychia has been reported in association with medications including many chemotherapy agents, and each band of transverse melanonychia may correspond to a cycle of therapy.11 Drug-induced melanonychia can affect several nails and tends to resolve after completion of therapy. Melanonychia has previously been described with vincristine, doxorubicin, hydroxyurea, cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, dacarbazine, methotrexate, and electron beam therapy.11 Nail pigmentation changes have been reported with docetaxel; a patient developed blue discoloration on the right and left thumb lunulae that improved 3 months after discontinuation of docetaxel therapy.13 While on docetaxel, another patient developed acral erythema, onycholysis, and longitudinal melanonychia in photoexposed areas, which was thought to be secondary to possible photosensitization.14 Possible explanations for paclitaxel-induced melanonychia include a direct toxic effect on the nail bed or nail matrix, focal stimulation of nail matrix melanocytes, or photosensitization. Drug-induced melanonychia commonly appears 3 to 8 weeks after drug intake and typically resolves 6 to 8 weeks after drug discontinuation.15

 

 

Predictors of taxane-related nail changes have been studied.5 Taxane-induced nail toxicity was more prevalent in patients who were female, had a history of diabetes mellitus, had received capecitabine with docetaxel, and had a diagnosis of breast or gynecological cancer. The nail changes increased with greater number of taxane cycles administered, body mass index, and severity of treatment-related neuropathy.5 Although nail changes often are temporary and typically resolve with drug withdrawal, they may persist in some patients.16 Possible measures have been proposed to prevent taxane-induced nail toxicity including frozen gloves,17 nail cutting, and avoiding potential fingernail irritants.18

It is possible that the nails of our darker-skinned patient may have been affected by some degree of melanonychia prior to starting the therapy, which cannot be ruled out. However, according to the patient, she only noticed the change after starting paclitaxel, raising the possibility of either new, worsening, or more diffuse involvement following initiation of paclitaxel therapy. Additionally, she was receiving weekly administration of paclitaxel and experienced severe neuropathy, both predictors of nail toxicity.5 No reports of melanonychia from lenalidomide have been reported in the literature indexed for MEDLINE. Although these nail changes are not life threatening, clinicians should be aware of these side effects, as they are cosmetically distressing to many patients and can impact quality of life.19

References

1. Crown J, O’Leary M. The taxanes: an update. Lancet. 2000;356:507-508.

2. Schiff PB, Fant J, Horwitz SB. Promotion of microtubule assembly in vitro by Taxol. Nature. 1979;277:665-667.

3. Heidary N, Naik H, Burgin S. Chemotherapeutic agents and the skin: an update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58:545-570.

4. Minisini AM, Tosti A, Sobrero AF, et al. Taxane-induced nail changes: incidence, clinical presentation and outcome. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:333-337.

5. Can G, Aydiner A, Cavdar I. Taxane-induced nail changes: predictors and efficacy of the use of frozen gloves and socks in the prevention of nail toxicity. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16:270-275.

6. Lüftner D, Flath B, Akrivakis C, et al. Dose-intensified weekly paclitaxel induces multiple nail disorders. Ann Oncol. 1998;9:1139-1141.

7. Hussain S, Anderson DN, Salvatti ME, et al. Onycholysis as a complication of systemic chemotherapy. report of five cases associated with prolonged weekly paclitaxel therapy and review of the literature. Cancer. 2000;88:2367-2371.

8. Almagro M, Del Pozo J, Garcia-Silva J, et al. Nail alterations secondary to paclitaxel therapy. Eur J Dermatol. 2000;10:146-147.

9. Flory SM, Solimando DA Jr, Webster GF, et al. Onycholysis associated with weekly administration of paclitaxel. Ann Pharmacother. 1999;33:584-586.

10. Hinds G, Thomas VD. Malignancy and cancer treatment-related hair and nail changes. Dermatol Clin. 2008;26:59-68.

11. Gilbar P, Hain A, Peereboom VM. Nail toxicity induced by cancer chemotherapy. J Oncol Pharm Practice. 2009;15:143-55.

12. Buka R, Friedman KA, Phelps RG, et al. Childhood longitudinal melanonychia: case reports and review of the literature. Mt Sinai J Med. 2001;68:331-335.

13. Halvorson CR, Erickson CL, Gaspari AA. A rare manifestation of nail changes with docetaxel therapy. Skinmed. 2010;8:179-180.

14. Ferreira O, Baudrier T, Mota A, et al. Docetaxel-induced acral erythema and nail changes distributed to photoexposed areas. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2010;29:296-299.

15. Piraccini BM, Iorizzo M. Drug reactions affecting the nail unit: diagnosis and management. Dermatol Clin. 2007;25:215-221.

16. Piraccini BM, Tosti A. Drug-induced nail disorders: incidence, management and prognosis. Drug Saf. 1999;21:187-201.

17. Scotté F, Tourani JM, Banu E, et al. Multicenter study of a frozen glove to prevent docetaxel-induced onycholysis and cutaneous toxicity of the hand. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4424-4429.

18. Gilbar P, Hain A, Peereboom VM. Nail toxicity induced by cancer chemotherapy. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2009;15:143-155.

19. Hackbarth M, Haas N, Fotopoulou C, et al. Chemotherapy-induced dermatological toxicity: frequencies and impact on quality of life in women’s cancers. results of a prospective study. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16:267-273.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Marisa Kardos Garshick, MD; Patricia Myskowski, MD; Richard Scher, MD

Drs. Garshick and Scher are from the Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. Dr. Scher also is from the Nail Disease Section. Dr. Myskowski is from the Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Marisa Kardos Garshick, MD, 1305 York Ave, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10021 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 95(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E12-E14
Legacy Keywords
paclitaxel, nail changes, melanonychia, onycholysis, chemotherapy
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Marisa Kardos Garshick, MD; Patricia Myskowski, MD; Richard Scher, MD

Drs. Garshick and Scher are from the Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. Dr. Scher also is from the Nail Disease Section. Dr. Myskowski is from the Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Marisa Kardos Garshick, MD, 1305 York Ave, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10021 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Marisa Kardos Garshick, MD; Patricia Myskowski, MD; Richard Scher, MD

Drs. Garshick and Scher are from the Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. Dr. Scher also is from the Nail Disease Section. Dr. Myskowski is from the Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Marisa Kardos Garshick, MD, 1305 York Ave, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10021 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

To the Editor:
Taxane-based chemotherapy including paclitaxel and docetaxel is commonly used to treat solid tumor malignancies including lung, breast, ovarian, and bladder cancers.1 Taxanes work by interrupting normal microtubule function by inducing tubulin polymerization and inhibiting microtubule depolymerization, thereby leading to cell cycle arrest at the gap 2 (premitotic) and mitotic phase and the blockade of cell division.2

Cutaneous side effects have been reported with taxane-based therapies, including alopecia, skin rash and erythema, and desquamation of the hands and feet (hand-foot syndrome).3 Nail changes also have been reported to occur in 0% to 44% of treated patients,4 with one study reporting an incidence as high as 50.5%.5 Nail abnormalities that have been described primarily include onycholysis, and less frequently Beau lines, subungual hemorrhagic bullae, subungual hyperkeratosis, splinter hemorrhages, acute paronychia, and pigmentary changes such as nail bed dyschromia. Among the taxanes, nail abnormalities are more commonly seen with docetaxel; few reports address paclitaxel-induced nail changes.4 Onycholysis, diffuse fingernail orange discoloration, Beau lines, subungual distal hyperkeratosis, and brown discoloration of 3 fingernail beds sparing the lunula have been reported with paclitaxel.6-9 We report a unique case of paclitaxel-associated melanonychia.

A 54-year-old black woman with a history of multiple myeloma and breast cancer who was being treated with paclitaxel for breast cancer presented with nail changes including nail darkening since initiating paclitaxel. She was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2010 and received bortezomib, dexamethasone, and an autologous stem cell transplant in August 2011. She never achieved complete remission but had been on lenalidomide with stable disease. She underwent a lumpectomy in December 2012, which revealed intraductal carcinoma with ductal carcinoma in situ that was estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor negative and ERBB2 (formerly HER2) positive. She was started on weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) to complete 12 cycles and trastuzumab (6 mg/kg) every 3 weeks. While on paclitaxel, she developed grade 2 neuropathy of the hands, leading to subsequent dose reduction at week 9. She denied any other changes to her medications. On clinical examination she had diffuse and well-demarcated, brown-black, longitudinal and transverse bands beginning at the proximal nail plate and progressing distally, with onycholysis involving all 20 nails (Figure, A and B). A nail clipping of the right hallux nail was sent for analysis. Pathology results showed evidence of scattered clusters of brown melanin pigment in the nail plate. Periodic acid–Schiff staining revealed numerous yeasts at the nail base but no infiltrating hyphae. Iron stain was negative for hemosiderin. The right index finger was injected with triamcinolone acetonide to treat the onycholysis. Four months after completing the paclitaxel, she began to notice lightening of the nails and improvement of the onycholysis in all nails (Figure, C and D).

 
 

Initial appearance of diffuse, well-demarcated, brown-black, longitudinal and transverse bands beginning at the proximal nail plate and progressing distally, with onycholysis in the nails on the right hand (A) and left hand (B). Four months after completing paclitaxel, the patient began to notice lightening of the nails and improvement of the onycholysis in the nails on the right hand (C) and left hand (D).

The highly proliferating cells that comprise the nail matrix epithelium mature, differentiate, and keratinize to form the nail plate and are susceptible to the antimitotic effects of systemic chemotherapy. As a result, systemic chemotherapies may lead to abnormal nail plate production and keratinization of the nail plate, causing the clinical manifestations of Beau lines, onychomadesis, and leukonychia.10

Melanonychia is the development of melanin pigmentation of the nail plate and is typically caused by matrix melanin deposition through the activation of nail matrix melanocytes. There are 3 patterns of melanonychia: longitudinal, transverse, and diffuse. A single nail plate can involve more than one pattern of melanonychia and several nails may be affected. Longitudinal melanonychia typically develops from the activation of a group of melanocytes in the nail matrix, while diffuse pigmentation arises from diffuse melanocyte activation.11 Longitudinal melanonychia is common in darker-pigmented individuals12 and can be associated with systemic diseases.10 Transverse melanonychia has been reported in association with medications including many chemotherapy agents, and each band of transverse melanonychia may correspond to a cycle of therapy.11 Drug-induced melanonychia can affect several nails and tends to resolve after completion of therapy. Melanonychia has previously been described with vincristine, doxorubicin, hydroxyurea, cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, dacarbazine, methotrexate, and electron beam therapy.11 Nail pigmentation changes have been reported with docetaxel; a patient developed blue discoloration on the right and left thumb lunulae that improved 3 months after discontinuation of docetaxel therapy.13 While on docetaxel, another patient developed acral erythema, onycholysis, and longitudinal melanonychia in photoexposed areas, which was thought to be secondary to possible photosensitization.14 Possible explanations for paclitaxel-induced melanonychia include a direct toxic effect on the nail bed or nail matrix, focal stimulation of nail matrix melanocytes, or photosensitization. Drug-induced melanonychia commonly appears 3 to 8 weeks after drug intake and typically resolves 6 to 8 weeks after drug discontinuation.15

 

 

Predictors of taxane-related nail changes have been studied.5 Taxane-induced nail toxicity was more prevalent in patients who were female, had a history of diabetes mellitus, had received capecitabine with docetaxel, and had a diagnosis of breast or gynecological cancer. The nail changes increased with greater number of taxane cycles administered, body mass index, and severity of treatment-related neuropathy.5 Although nail changes often are temporary and typically resolve with drug withdrawal, they may persist in some patients.16 Possible measures have been proposed to prevent taxane-induced nail toxicity including frozen gloves,17 nail cutting, and avoiding potential fingernail irritants.18

It is possible that the nails of our darker-skinned patient may have been affected by some degree of melanonychia prior to starting the therapy, which cannot be ruled out. However, according to the patient, she only noticed the change after starting paclitaxel, raising the possibility of either new, worsening, or more diffuse involvement following initiation of paclitaxel therapy. Additionally, she was receiving weekly administration of paclitaxel and experienced severe neuropathy, both predictors of nail toxicity.5 No reports of melanonychia from lenalidomide have been reported in the literature indexed for MEDLINE. Although these nail changes are not life threatening, clinicians should be aware of these side effects, as they are cosmetically distressing to many patients and can impact quality of life.19

To the Editor:
Taxane-based chemotherapy including paclitaxel and docetaxel is commonly used to treat solid tumor malignancies including lung, breast, ovarian, and bladder cancers.1 Taxanes work by interrupting normal microtubule function by inducing tubulin polymerization and inhibiting microtubule depolymerization, thereby leading to cell cycle arrest at the gap 2 (premitotic) and mitotic phase and the blockade of cell division.2

Cutaneous side effects have been reported with taxane-based therapies, including alopecia, skin rash and erythema, and desquamation of the hands and feet (hand-foot syndrome).3 Nail changes also have been reported to occur in 0% to 44% of treated patients,4 with one study reporting an incidence as high as 50.5%.5 Nail abnormalities that have been described primarily include onycholysis, and less frequently Beau lines, subungual hemorrhagic bullae, subungual hyperkeratosis, splinter hemorrhages, acute paronychia, and pigmentary changes such as nail bed dyschromia. Among the taxanes, nail abnormalities are more commonly seen with docetaxel; few reports address paclitaxel-induced nail changes.4 Onycholysis, diffuse fingernail orange discoloration, Beau lines, subungual distal hyperkeratosis, and brown discoloration of 3 fingernail beds sparing the lunula have been reported with paclitaxel.6-9 We report a unique case of paclitaxel-associated melanonychia.

A 54-year-old black woman with a history of multiple myeloma and breast cancer who was being treated with paclitaxel for breast cancer presented with nail changes including nail darkening since initiating paclitaxel. She was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2010 and received bortezomib, dexamethasone, and an autologous stem cell transplant in August 2011. She never achieved complete remission but had been on lenalidomide with stable disease. She underwent a lumpectomy in December 2012, which revealed intraductal carcinoma with ductal carcinoma in situ that was estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor negative and ERBB2 (formerly HER2) positive. She was started on weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) to complete 12 cycles and trastuzumab (6 mg/kg) every 3 weeks. While on paclitaxel, she developed grade 2 neuropathy of the hands, leading to subsequent dose reduction at week 9. She denied any other changes to her medications. On clinical examination she had diffuse and well-demarcated, brown-black, longitudinal and transverse bands beginning at the proximal nail plate and progressing distally, with onycholysis involving all 20 nails (Figure, A and B). A nail clipping of the right hallux nail was sent for analysis. Pathology results showed evidence of scattered clusters of brown melanin pigment in the nail plate. Periodic acid–Schiff staining revealed numerous yeasts at the nail base but no infiltrating hyphae. Iron stain was negative for hemosiderin. The right index finger was injected with triamcinolone acetonide to treat the onycholysis. Four months after completing the paclitaxel, she began to notice lightening of the nails and improvement of the onycholysis in all nails (Figure, C and D).

 
 

Initial appearance of diffuse, well-demarcated, brown-black, longitudinal and transverse bands beginning at the proximal nail plate and progressing distally, with onycholysis in the nails on the right hand (A) and left hand (B). Four months after completing paclitaxel, the patient began to notice lightening of the nails and improvement of the onycholysis in the nails on the right hand (C) and left hand (D).

The highly proliferating cells that comprise the nail matrix epithelium mature, differentiate, and keratinize to form the nail plate and are susceptible to the antimitotic effects of systemic chemotherapy. As a result, systemic chemotherapies may lead to abnormal nail plate production and keratinization of the nail plate, causing the clinical manifestations of Beau lines, onychomadesis, and leukonychia.10

Melanonychia is the development of melanin pigmentation of the nail plate and is typically caused by matrix melanin deposition through the activation of nail matrix melanocytes. There are 3 patterns of melanonychia: longitudinal, transverse, and diffuse. A single nail plate can involve more than one pattern of melanonychia and several nails may be affected. Longitudinal melanonychia typically develops from the activation of a group of melanocytes in the nail matrix, while diffuse pigmentation arises from diffuse melanocyte activation.11 Longitudinal melanonychia is common in darker-pigmented individuals12 and can be associated with systemic diseases.10 Transverse melanonychia has been reported in association with medications including many chemotherapy agents, and each band of transverse melanonychia may correspond to a cycle of therapy.11 Drug-induced melanonychia can affect several nails and tends to resolve after completion of therapy. Melanonychia has previously been described with vincristine, doxorubicin, hydroxyurea, cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, dacarbazine, methotrexate, and electron beam therapy.11 Nail pigmentation changes have been reported with docetaxel; a patient developed blue discoloration on the right and left thumb lunulae that improved 3 months after discontinuation of docetaxel therapy.13 While on docetaxel, another patient developed acral erythema, onycholysis, and longitudinal melanonychia in photoexposed areas, which was thought to be secondary to possible photosensitization.14 Possible explanations for paclitaxel-induced melanonychia include a direct toxic effect on the nail bed or nail matrix, focal stimulation of nail matrix melanocytes, or photosensitization. Drug-induced melanonychia commonly appears 3 to 8 weeks after drug intake and typically resolves 6 to 8 weeks after drug discontinuation.15

 

 

Predictors of taxane-related nail changes have been studied.5 Taxane-induced nail toxicity was more prevalent in patients who were female, had a history of diabetes mellitus, had received capecitabine with docetaxel, and had a diagnosis of breast or gynecological cancer. The nail changes increased with greater number of taxane cycles administered, body mass index, and severity of treatment-related neuropathy.5 Although nail changes often are temporary and typically resolve with drug withdrawal, they may persist in some patients.16 Possible measures have been proposed to prevent taxane-induced nail toxicity including frozen gloves,17 nail cutting, and avoiding potential fingernail irritants.18

It is possible that the nails of our darker-skinned patient may have been affected by some degree of melanonychia prior to starting the therapy, which cannot be ruled out. However, according to the patient, she only noticed the change after starting paclitaxel, raising the possibility of either new, worsening, or more diffuse involvement following initiation of paclitaxel therapy. Additionally, she was receiving weekly administration of paclitaxel and experienced severe neuropathy, both predictors of nail toxicity.5 No reports of melanonychia from lenalidomide have been reported in the literature indexed for MEDLINE. Although these nail changes are not life threatening, clinicians should be aware of these side effects, as they are cosmetically distressing to many patients and can impact quality of life.19

References

1. Crown J, O’Leary M. The taxanes: an update. Lancet. 2000;356:507-508.

2. Schiff PB, Fant J, Horwitz SB. Promotion of microtubule assembly in vitro by Taxol. Nature. 1979;277:665-667.

3. Heidary N, Naik H, Burgin S. Chemotherapeutic agents and the skin: an update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58:545-570.

4. Minisini AM, Tosti A, Sobrero AF, et al. Taxane-induced nail changes: incidence, clinical presentation and outcome. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:333-337.

5. Can G, Aydiner A, Cavdar I. Taxane-induced nail changes: predictors and efficacy of the use of frozen gloves and socks in the prevention of nail toxicity. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16:270-275.

6. Lüftner D, Flath B, Akrivakis C, et al. Dose-intensified weekly paclitaxel induces multiple nail disorders. Ann Oncol. 1998;9:1139-1141.

7. Hussain S, Anderson DN, Salvatti ME, et al. Onycholysis as a complication of systemic chemotherapy. report of five cases associated with prolonged weekly paclitaxel therapy and review of the literature. Cancer. 2000;88:2367-2371.

8. Almagro M, Del Pozo J, Garcia-Silva J, et al. Nail alterations secondary to paclitaxel therapy. Eur J Dermatol. 2000;10:146-147.

9. Flory SM, Solimando DA Jr, Webster GF, et al. Onycholysis associated with weekly administration of paclitaxel. Ann Pharmacother. 1999;33:584-586.

10. Hinds G, Thomas VD. Malignancy and cancer treatment-related hair and nail changes. Dermatol Clin. 2008;26:59-68.

11. Gilbar P, Hain A, Peereboom VM. Nail toxicity induced by cancer chemotherapy. J Oncol Pharm Practice. 2009;15:143-55.

12. Buka R, Friedman KA, Phelps RG, et al. Childhood longitudinal melanonychia: case reports and review of the literature. Mt Sinai J Med. 2001;68:331-335.

13. Halvorson CR, Erickson CL, Gaspari AA. A rare manifestation of nail changes with docetaxel therapy. Skinmed. 2010;8:179-180.

14. Ferreira O, Baudrier T, Mota A, et al. Docetaxel-induced acral erythema and nail changes distributed to photoexposed areas. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2010;29:296-299.

15. Piraccini BM, Iorizzo M. Drug reactions affecting the nail unit: diagnosis and management. Dermatol Clin. 2007;25:215-221.

16. Piraccini BM, Tosti A. Drug-induced nail disorders: incidence, management and prognosis. Drug Saf. 1999;21:187-201.

17. Scotté F, Tourani JM, Banu E, et al. Multicenter study of a frozen glove to prevent docetaxel-induced onycholysis and cutaneous toxicity of the hand. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4424-4429.

18. Gilbar P, Hain A, Peereboom VM. Nail toxicity induced by cancer chemotherapy. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2009;15:143-155.

19. Hackbarth M, Haas N, Fotopoulou C, et al. Chemotherapy-induced dermatological toxicity: frequencies and impact on quality of life in women’s cancers. results of a prospective study. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16:267-273.

References

1. Crown J, O’Leary M. The taxanes: an update. Lancet. 2000;356:507-508.

2. Schiff PB, Fant J, Horwitz SB. Promotion of microtubule assembly in vitro by Taxol. Nature. 1979;277:665-667.

3. Heidary N, Naik H, Burgin S. Chemotherapeutic agents and the skin: an update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58:545-570.

4. Minisini AM, Tosti A, Sobrero AF, et al. Taxane-induced nail changes: incidence, clinical presentation and outcome. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:333-337.

5. Can G, Aydiner A, Cavdar I. Taxane-induced nail changes: predictors and efficacy of the use of frozen gloves and socks in the prevention of nail toxicity. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16:270-275.

6. Lüftner D, Flath B, Akrivakis C, et al. Dose-intensified weekly paclitaxel induces multiple nail disorders. Ann Oncol. 1998;9:1139-1141.

7. Hussain S, Anderson DN, Salvatti ME, et al. Onycholysis as a complication of systemic chemotherapy. report of five cases associated with prolonged weekly paclitaxel therapy and review of the literature. Cancer. 2000;88:2367-2371.

8. Almagro M, Del Pozo J, Garcia-Silva J, et al. Nail alterations secondary to paclitaxel therapy. Eur J Dermatol. 2000;10:146-147.

9. Flory SM, Solimando DA Jr, Webster GF, et al. Onycholysis associated with weekly administration of paclitaxel. Ann Pharmacother. 1999;33:584-586.

10. Hinds G, Thomas VD. Malignancy and cancer treatment-related hair and nail changes. Dermatol Clin. 2008;26:59-68.

11. Gilbar P, Hain A, Peereboom VM. Nail toxicity induced by cancer chemotherapy. J Oncol Pharm Practice. 2009;15:143-55.

12. Buka R, Friedman KA, Phelps RG, et al. Childhood longitudinal melanonychia: case reports and review of the literature. Mt Sinai J Med. 2001;68:331-335.

13. Halvorson CR, Erickson CL, Gaspari AA. A rare manifestation of nail changes with docetaxel therapy. Skinmed. 2010;8:179-180.

14. Ferreira O, Baudrier T, Mota A, et al. Docetaxel-induced acral erythema and nail changes distributed to photoexposed areas. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2010;29:296-299.

15. Piraccini BM, Iorizzo M. Drug reactions affecting the nail unit: diagnosis and management. Dermatol Clin. 2007;25:215-221.

16. Piraccini BM, Tosti A. Drug-induced nail disorders: incidence, management and prognosis. Drug Saf. 1999;21:187-201.

17. Scotté F, Tourani JM, Banu E, et al. Multicenter study of a frozen glove to prevent docetaxel-induced onycholysis and cutaneous toxicity of the hand. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4424-4429.

18. Gilbar P, Hain A, Peereboom VM. Nail toxicity induced by cancer chemotherapy. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2009;15:143-155.

19. Hackbarth M, Haas N, Fotopoulou C, et al. Chemotherapy-induced dermatological toxicity: frequencies and impact on quality of life in women’s cancers. results of a prospective study. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16:267-273.

Issue
Cutis - 95(1)
Issue
Cutis - 95(1)
Page Number
E12-E14
Page Number
E12-E14
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Paclitaxel-Associated Melanonychia
Display Headline
Paclitaxel-Associated Melanonychia
Legacy Keywords
paclitaxel, nail changes, melanonychia, onycholysis, chemotherapy
Legacy Keywords
paclitaxel, nail changes, melanonychia, onycholysis, chemotherapy
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Verrucous Kaposi Sarcoma in an HIV-Positive Man

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 01/10/2019 - 13:20
Display Headline
Verrucous Kaposi Sarcoma in an HIV-Positive Man

To the Editor:

Verrucous Kaposi sarcoma (VKS) is an uncommon variant of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) that rarely is seen in clinical practice or reported in the literature. It is strongly associated with lymphedema in patients with AIDS.1 We present a case of VKS in a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–positive man with cutaneous lesions that demonstrated minimal response to treatment with efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir, doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and alitretinoin.

A 48-year-old man with a history of untreated HIV presented with a persistent eruption of heavily scaled, hyperpigmented, nonindurated, thin plaques in an ichthyosiform pattern on the bilateral lower legs and ankles of 4 years’ duration (Figure 1). He also had a number of soft, compressible, cystlike plaques without much overlying epidermal change on the lower extremities. He denied any prior episodes of skin breakdown, drainage, or secondary infection. Findings from the physical examination were otherwise unremarkable.

Figure 1. Hyperpigmented, nonindurated, thin plaques in an ichthyosiform pattern, as well as a number of soft, compressible, cystlike plaques on the lower leg.

Two punch biopsies were performed on the lower legs, one from a scaly plaque and the other from a cystic area. The epidermis was hyperkeratotic and mildly hyperplastic with slitlike vascular spaces. A dense cellular proliferation of spindle-shaped cells was present in the dermis (Figure 2). Minimal cytologic atypia was noted. Immunohistochemical staining for human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) was strongly positive (Figure 3). Histologically, the cutaneous lesions were consistent with VKS.

Figure 2. A dense cellular proliferation of spindle-shaped cells was present in the dermis as well as slitlike vascular spaces and minimal cytologic atypia (H&E, original magnification ×40).

Figure 3. Immunohistochemical staining for human herpesvirus 8 was strongly positive (original magnification ×40).

At the current presentation, the CD4 count was 355 cells/mm3 and the viral load was 919,223 copies/mL. The CD4 count and viral load initially had been responsive to efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir  therapy; 17 months prior to the current presentation, the CD4 count was 692 cells/mm3 and the viral load was less than 50 copies/mL. However, the cutaneous lesions persisted despite therapy with efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir, alitretinoin gel, and intralesional chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin and paclitaxel.

Kaposi sarcoma, first described by Moritz Kaposi in 1872, represents a group of vascular neoplasms. Multiple subtypes have been described including classic, African endemic, transplant/AIDS associated, anaplastic, lymphedematous, hyperkeratotic/verrucous, keloidal, micronodular, pyogenic granulomalike, ecchymotic, and intravascular.1-3 Human herpesvirus 8 is associated with all clinical subtypes of KS.3 Immunohistochemical staining for HHV-8 latent nuclear antigen-1 has been shown in the literature to be highly sensitive and specific for KS and can potentially facilitate the diagnosis of KS among patients with similarly appearing dermatologic conditions, such as angiosarcoma, kaposiform hemangioendothelioma, or verrucous hemangioma.1,4 Human herpesvirus 8 infects endothelial cells and induces the proliferation of vascular spindle cells via the secretion of basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor.5 Human herpesvirus 8 also can lead to lymph vessel obstruction and lymph node enlargement by infecting cells within the lymphatic system. In addition, chronic lymphedema can itself lead to verruciform epidermal hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis, which has a clinical presentation similar to VKS.1

AIDS-associated KS typically starts as 1 or more purple-red macules that rapidly progress into papules, nodules, and plaques.1 These lesions have a predilection for the head, neck, trunk, and mucous membranes. Albeit a rare presentation, VKS is strongly associated with lymphedema in patients with AIDS.1,3,5 Previously, KS was often the presenting clinical manifestation of HIV infection, but since the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has become the standard of care, the incidence as well as the morbidity and mortality associated with KS has substantially decreased.1,5-7 Notably, in HIV patients who initially do not have signs or symptoms of KS, HHV-8 positivity is predictive of the development of KS within 2 to 4 years.6

In the literature, good prognostic indicators for KS include CD4 count greater than 150 cells/mm3, only cutaneous involvement, and negative B symptoms (eg, temperature >38°C, night sweats, unintentional weight loss >10% of normal body weight within 6 months).7 Kaposi sarcoma cannot be completely cured but can be appropriately managed with medical intervention. All KS subtypes are sensitive to radiation therapy; recalcitrant localized lesions can be treated with excision, cryotherapy, alitretinoin gel, laser ablation, or locally injected interferon or chemotherapeutic agents (eg, vincristine, vinblastine, actinomycin D).5,6 Liposomal anthracyclines (doxorubicin) and paclitaxel are first- and second-line agents for advanced KS, respectively.6

In HIV-associated KS, lesions frequently involute with the initiation of HAART; however, the cutaneous lesions in our patient persisted despite initiation of efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir. He also was given intralesional doxorubicin andpaclitaxel as well as topical alitretinoin but did not experience complete resolution of the cutaneous lesions. It is possible that patients with VKS are recalcitrant to typical treatment modalities and therefore may require unconventional therapies to achieve maximal clearance of cutaneous lesions.

Verrucous Kaposi sarcoma is a rare presentation of KS that is infrequently seen in clinical practice or reported in the literature.3 A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the search term verrucous Kaposi sarcoma yielded 13 articles, one of which included a case series of 5 patients with AIDS and hyperkeratotic KS in Germany in the 1990s.5 Four of the articles were written in French, German, or Portuguese.8-11 The remainder of the articles discussed variants of KS other than VKS.

Although most patients with HIV and KS effectively respond to HAART, it may be possible that VKS is more difficult to treat. In addition, immunohistochemical staining for HHV-8, in particular HHV-8 latent nuclear antigen-1, may be useful to diagnose KS in HIV patients with uncharacteristic or indeterminate cutaneous lesions. Further research is needed to identify and delineate various efficacious therapeutic options for recalcitrant KS, particularly VKS.

Acknowledgment
We are indebted to Antoinette F. Hood, MD, Norfolk, Virginia, who digitized our patient’s histopathology slides.

References

 

1. Grayson W, Pantanowitz L. Histological variants of cutaneous Kaposi sarcoma. Diagn Pathol. 2008;3:31.

2. Amodio E, Goedert JJ, Barozzi P, et al. Differences in Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-specific and herpesvirus-non-specific immune responses in classic Kaposi sarcoma cases and matched controls in Sicily. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:1769-1773.

3. Fagone S, Cavaleri A, Camuto M, et al. Hyperkeratotic Kaposi sarcoma with leg lymphedema after prolonged corticosteroid therapy for SLE. case report and review of the literature. Minerva Med. 2001;92:177-202.

4. Cheuk W, Wong KO, Wong CS, et al. Immunostaining for human herpesvirus 8 latent nuclear antigen-1 helps distinguish Kaposi sarcoma from its mimickers. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;121:335-342.

5. Hengge UR, Stocks K, Goos M. Acquired immune deficiency syndrome-related hyperkeratotic Kaposi’s sarcoma with severe lymphedema: report of 5 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142:501-505.

6. James WD, Berger TG, Elston DM, eds. Andrews’ Diseases of the Skin: Clinical Dermatology. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2006.

7. Thomas S, Sindhu CB, Sreekumar S, et al. AIDS associated Kaposi’s Sarcoma. J Assoc Physicians India. 2011;59:387-389.

8. Mukai MM, Chaves T, Caldas L, et al. Primary Kaposi’s sarcoma of the penis [in Portuguese]. An Bras Dermatol. 2009;84:524-526.

9. Weidauer H, Tilgen W, Adler D. Kaposi’s sarcoma of the larynx [in German]. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1986;65:389-391.

10. Basset A. Clinical aspects of Kaposi’s disease [in French]. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1984;77(4, pt 2):529-532.

11. Wlotzke U, Hohenleutner U, Landthaler M. Dermatoses in leg amputees [in German]. Hautarzt. 1996;47:493-501.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Paul is from the Department of Surgery, Section of Dermatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. Drs. Marathe and Pariser are from the Department of Dermatology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk. Dr. Pariser also is from Virginia Clinical Research, Inc, Norfolk.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Joan Paul, MD, MPH, 18 Old Etna Rd, 3rd Floor, Section of Dermatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 95(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E7-E9
Legacy Keywords
Kaposi sarcoma, verrucous, HIV, herpes virus 8
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Paul is from the Department of Surgery, Section of Dermatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. Drs. Marathe and Pariser are from the Department of Dermatology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk. Dr. Pariser also is from Virginia Clinical Research, Inc, Norfolk.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Joan Paul, MD, MPH, 18 Old Etna Rd, 3rd Floor, Section of Dermatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Paul is from the Department of Surgery, Section of Dermatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. Drs. Marathe and Pariser are from the Department of Dermatology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk. Dr. Pariser also is from Virginia Clinical Research, Inc, Norfolk.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Joan Paul, MD, MPH, 18 Old Etna Rd, 3rd Floor, Section of Dermatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

To the Editor:

Verrucous Kaposi sarcoma (VKS) is an uncommon variant of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) that rarely is seen in clinical practice or reported in the literature. It is strongly associated with lymphedema in patients with AIDS.1 We present a case of VKS in a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–positive man with cutaneous lesions that demonstrated minimal response to treatment with efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir, doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and alitretinoin.

A 48-year-old man with a history of untreated HIV presented with a persistent eruption of heavily scaled, hyperpigmented, nonindurated, thin plaques in an ichthyosiform pattern on the bilateral lower legs and ankles of 4 years’ duration (Figure 1). He also had a number of soft, compressible, cystlike plaques without much overlying epidermal change on the lower extremities. He denied any prior episodes of skin breakdown, drainage, or secondary infection. Findings from the physical examination were otherwise unremarkable.

Figure 1. Hyperpigmented, nonindurated, thin plaques in an ichthyosiform pattern, as well as a number of soft, compressible, cystlike plaques on the lower leg.

Two punch biopsies were performed on the lower legs, one from a scaly plaque and the other from a cystic area. The epidermis was hyperkeratotic and mildly hyperplastic with slitlike vascular spaces. A dense cellular proliferation of spindle-shaped cells was present in the dermis (Figure 2). Minimal cytologic atypia was noted. Immunohistochemical staining for human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) was strongly positive (Figure 3). Histologically, the cutaneous lesions were consistent with VKS.

Figure 2. A dense cellular proliferation of spindle-shaped cells was present in the dermis as well as slitlike vascular spaces and minimal cytologic atypia (H&E, original magnification ×40).

Figure 3. Immunohistochemical staining for human herpesvirus 8 was strongly positive (original magnification ×40).

At the current presentation, the CD4 count was 355 cells/mm3 and the viral load was 919,223 copies/mL. The CD4 count and viral load initially had been responsive to efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir  therapy; 17 months prior to the current presentation, the CD4 count was 692 cells/mm3 and the viral load was less than 50 copies/mL. However, the cutaneous lesions persisted despite therapy with efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir, alitretinoin gel, and intralesional chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin and paclitaxel.

Kaposi sarcoma, first described by Moritz Kaposi in 1872, represents a group of vascular neoplasms. Multiple subtypes have been described including classic, African endemic, transplant/AIDS associated, anaplastic, lymphedematous, hyperkeratotic/verrucous, keloidal, micronodular, pyogenic granulomalike, ecchymotic, and intravascular.1-3 Human herpesvirus 8 is associated with all clinical subtypes of KS.3 Immunohistochemical staining for HHV-8 latent nuclear antigen-1 has been shown in the literature to be highly sensitive and specific for KS and can potentially facilitate the diagnosis of KS among patients with similarly appearing dermatologic conditions, such as angiosarcoma, kaposiform hemangioendothelioma, or verrucous hemangioma.1,4 Human herpesvirus 8 infects endothelial cells and induces the proliferation of vascular spindle cells via the secretion of basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor.5 Human herpesvirus 8 also can lead to lymph vessel obstruction and lymph node enlargement by infecting cells within the lymphatic system. In addition, chronic lymphedema can itself lead to verruciform epidermal hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis, which has a clinical presentation similar to VKS.1

AIDS-associated KS typically starts as 1 or more purple-red macules that rapidly progress into papules, nodules, and plaques.1 These lesions have a predilection for the head, neck, trunk, and mucous membranes. Albeit a rare presentation, VKS is strongly associated with lymphedema in patients with AIDS.1,3,5 Previously, KS was often the presenting clinical manifestation of HIV infection, but since the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has become the standard of care, the incidence as well as the morbidity and mortality associated with KS has substantially decreased.1,5-7 Notably, in HIV patients who initially do not have signs or symptoms of KS, HHV-8 positivity is predictive of the development of KS within 2 to 4 years.6

In the literature, good prognostic indicators for KS include CD4 count greater than 150 cells/mm3, only cutaneous involvement, and negative B symptoms (eg, temperature >38°C, night sweats, unintentional weight loss >10% of normal body weight within 6 months).7 Kaposi sarcoma cannot be completely cured but can be appropriately managed with medical intervention. All KS subtypes are sensitive to radiation therapy; recalcitrant localized lesions can be treated with excision, cryotherapy, alitretinoin gel, laser ablation, or locally injected interferon or chemotherapeutic agents (eg, vincristine, vinblastine, actinomycin D).5,6 Liposomal anthracyclines (doxorubicin) and paclitaxel are first- and second-line agents for advanced KS, respectively.6

In HIV-associated KS, lesions frequently involute with the initiation of HAART; however, the cutaneous lesions in our patient persisted despite initiation of efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir. He also was given intralesional doxorubicin andpaclitaxel as well as topical alitretinoin but did not experience complete resolution of the cutaneous lesions. It is possible that patients with VKS are recalcitrant to typical treatment modalities and therefore may require unconventional therapies to achieve maximal clearance of cutaneous lesions.

Verrucous Kaposi sarcoma is a rare presentation of KS that is infrequently seen in clinical practice or reported in the literature.3 A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the search term verrucous Kaposi sarcoma yielded 13 articles, one of which included a case series of 5 patients with AIDS and hyperkeratotic KS in Germany in the 1990s.5 Four of the articles were written in French, German, or Portuguese.8-11 The remainder of the articles discussed variants of KS other than VKS.

Although most patients with HIV and KS effectively respond to HAART, it may be possible that VKS is more difficult to treat. In addition, immunohistochemical staining for HHV-8, in particular HHV-8 latent nuclear antigen-1, may be useful to diagnose KS in HIV patients with uncharacteristic or indeterminate cutaneous lesions. Further research is needed to identify and delineate various efficacious therapeutic options for recalcitrant KS, particularly VKS.

Acknowledgment
We are indebted to Antoinette F. Hood, MD, Norfolk, Virginia, who digitized our patient’s histopathology slides.

To the Editor:

Verrucous Kaposi sarcoma (VKS) is an uncommon variant of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) that rarely is seen in clinical practice or reported in the literature. It is strongly associated with lymphedema in patients with AIDS.1 We present a case of VKS in a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–positive man with cutaneous lesions that demonstrated minimal response to treatment with efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir, doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and alitretinoin.

A 48-year-old man with a history of untreated HIV presented with a persistent eruption of heavily scaled, hyperpigmented, nonindurated, thin plaques in an ichthyosiform pattern on the bilateral lower legs and ankles of 4 years’ duration (Figure 1). He also had a number of soft, compressible, cystlike plaques without much overlying epidermal change on the lower extremities. He denied any prior episodes of skin breakdown, drainage, or secondary infection. Findings from the physical examination were otherwise unremarkable.

Figure 1. Hyperpigmented, nonindurated, thin plaques in an ichthyosiform pattern, as well as a number of soft, compressible, cystlike plaques on the lower leg.

Two punch biopsies were performed on the lower legs, one from a scaly plaque and the other from a cystic area. The epidermis was hyperkeratotic and mildly hyperplastic with slitlike vascular spaces. A dense cellular proliferation of spindle-shaped cells was present in the dermis (Figure 2). Minimal cytologic atypia was noted. Immunohistochemical staining for human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) was strongly positive (Figure 3). Histologically, the cutaneous lesions were consistent with VKS.

Figure 2. A dense cellular proliferation of spindle-shaped cells was present in the dermis as well as slitlike vascular spaces and minimal cytologic atypia (H&E, original magnification ×40).

Figure 3. Immunohistochemical staining for human herpesvirus 8 was strongly positive (original magnification ×40).

At the current presentation, the CD4 count was 355 cells/mm3 and the viral load was 919,223 copies/mL. The CD4 count and viral load initially had been responsive to efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir  therapy; 17 months prior to the current presentation, the CD4 count was 692 cells/mm3 and the viral load was less than 50 copies/mL. However, the cutaneous lesions persisted despite therapy with efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir, alitretinoin gel, and intralesional chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin and paclitaxel.

Kaposi sarcoma, first described by Moritz Kaposi in 1872, represents a group of vascular neoplasms. Multiple subtypes have been described including classic, African endemic, transplant/AIDS associated, anaplastic, lymphedematous, hyperkeratotic/verrucous, keloidal, micronodular, pyogenic granulomalike, ecchymotic, and intravascular.1-3 Human herpesvirus 8 is associated with all clinical subtypes of KS.3 Immunohistochemical staining for HHV-8 latent nuclear antigen-1 has been shown in the literature to be highly sensitive and specific for KS and can potentially facilitate the diagnosis of KS among patients with similarly appearing dermatologic conditions, such as angiosarcoma, kaposiform hemangioendothelioma, or verrucous hemangioma.1,4 Human herpesvirus 8 infects endothelial cells and induces the proliferation of vascular spindle cells via the secretion of basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor.5 Human herpesvirus 8 also can lead to lymph vessel obstruction and lymph node enlargement by infecting cells within the lymphatic system. In addition, chronic lymphedema can itself lead to verruciform epidermal hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis, which has a clinical presentation similar to VKS.1

AIDS-associated KS typically starts as 1 or more purple-red macules that rapidly progress into papules, nodules, and plaques.1 These lesions have a predilection for the head, neck, trunk, and mucous membranes. Albeit a rare presentation, VKS is strongly associated with lymphedema in patients with AIDS.1,3,5 Previously, KS was often the presenting clinical manifestation of HIV infection, but since the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has become the standard of care, the incidence as well as the morbidity and mortality associated with KS has substantially decreased.1,5-7 Notably, in HIV patients who initially do not have signs or symptoms of KS, HHV-8 positivity is predictive of the development of KS within 2 to 4 years.6

In the literature, good prognostic indicators for KS include CD4 count greater than 150 cells/mm3, only cutaneous involvement, and negative B symptoms (eg, temperature >38°C, night sweats, unintentional weight loss >10% of normal body weight within 6 months).7 Kaposi sarcoma cannot be completely cured but can be appropriately managed with medical intervention. All KS subtypes are sensitive to radiation therapy; recalcitrant localized lesions can be treated with excision, cryotherapy, alitretinoin gel, laser ablation, or locally injected interferon or chemotherapeutic agents (eg, vincristine, vinblastine, actinomycin D).5,6 Liposomal anthracyclines (doxorubicin) and paclitaxel are first- and second-line agents for advanced KS, respectively.6

In HIV-associated KS, lesions frequently involute with the initiation of HAART; however, the cutaneous lesions in our patient persisted despite initiation of efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir. He also was given intralesional doxorubicin andpaclitaxel as well as topical alitretinoin but did not experience complete resolution of the cutaneous lesions. It is possible that patients with VKS are recalcitrant to typical treatment modalities and therefore may require unconventional therapies to achieve maximal clearance of cutaneous lesions.

Verrucous Kaposi sarcoma is a rare presentation of KS that is infrequently seen in clinical practice or reported in the literature.3 A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the search term verrucous Kaposi sarcoma yielded 13 articles, one of which included a case series of 5 patients with AIDS and hyperkeratotic KS in Germany in the 1990s.5 Four of the articles were written in French, German, or Portuguese.8-11 The remainder of the articles discussed variants of KS other than VKS.

Although most patients with HIV and KS effectively respond to HAART, it may be possible that VKS is more difficult to treat. In addition, immunohistochemical staining for HHV-8, in particular HHV-8 latent nuclear antigen-1, may be useful to diagnose KS in HIV patients with uncharacteristic or indeterminate cutaneous lesions. Further research is needed to identify and delineate various efficacious therapeutic options for recalcitrant KS, particularly VKS.

Acknowledgment
We are indebted to Antoinette F. Hood, MD, Norfolk, Virginia, who digitized our patient’s histopathology slides.

References

 

1. Grayson W, Pantanowitz L. Histological variants of cutaneous Kaposi sarcoma. Diagn Pathol. 2008;3:31.

2. Amodio E, Goedert JJ, Barozzi P, et al. Differences in Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-specific and herpesvirus-non-specific immune responses in classic Kaposi sarcoma cases and matched controls in Sicily. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:1769-1773.

3. Fagone S, Cavaleri A, Camuto M, et al. Hyperkeratotic Kaposi sarcoma with leg lymphedema after prolonged corticosteroid therapy for SLE. case report and review of the literature. Minerva Med. 2001;92:177-202.

4. Cheuk W, Wong KO, Wong CS, et al. Immunostaining for human herpesvirus 8 latent nuclear antigen-1 helps distinguish Kaposi sarcoma from its mimickers. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;121:335-342.

5. Hengge UR, Stocks K, Goos M. Acquired immune deficiency syndrome-related hyperkeratotic Kaposi’s sarcoma with severe lymphedema: report of 5 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142:501-505.

6. James WD, Berger TG, Elston DM, eds. Andrews’ Diseases of the Skin: Clinical Dermatology. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2006.

7. Thomas S, Sindhu CB, Sreekumar S, et al. AIDS associated Kaposi’s Sarcoma. J Assoc Physicians India. 2011;59:387-389.

8. Mukai MM, Chaves T, Caldas L, et al. Primary Kaposi’s sarcoma of the penis [in Portuguese]. An Bras Dermatol. 2009;84:524-526.

9. Weidauer H, Tilgen W, Adler D. Kaposi’s sarcoma of the larynx [in German]. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1986;65:389-391.

10. Basset A. Clinical aspects of Kaposi’s disease [in French]. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1984;77(4, pt 2):529-532.

11. Wlotzke U, Hohenleutner U, Landthaler M. Dermatoses in leg amputees [in German]. Hautarzt. 1996;47:493-501.

References

 

1. Grayson W, Pantanowitz L. Histological variants of cutaneous Kaposi sarcoma. Diagn Pathol. 2008;3:31.

2. Amodio E, Goedert JJ, Barozzi P, et al. Differences in Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-specific and herpesvirus-non-specific immune responses in classic Kaposi sarcoma cases and matched controls in Sicily. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:1769-1773.

3. Fagone S, Cavaleri A, Camuto M, et al. Hyperkeratotic Kaposi sarcoma with leg lymphedema after prolonged corticosteroid therapy for SLE. case report and review of the literature. Minerva Med. 2001;92:177-202.

4. Cheuk W, Wong KO, Wong CS, et al. Immunostaining for human herpesvirus 8 latent nuclear antigen-1 helps distinguish Kaposi sarcoma from its mimickers. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;121:335-342.

5. Hengge UR, Stocks K, Goos M. Acquired immune deficiency syndrome-related hyperkeratotic Kaposi’s sarcoma with severe lymphedema: report of 5 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142:501-505.

6. James WD, Berger TG, Elston DM, eds. Andrews’ Diseases of the Skin: Clinical Dermatology. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2006.

7. Thomas S, Sindhu CB, Sreekumar S, et al. AIDS associated Kaposi’s Sarcoma. J Assoc Physicians India. 2011;59:387-389.

8. Mukai MM, Chaves T, Caldas L, et al. Primary Kaposi’s sarcoma of the penis [in Portuguese]. An Bras Dermatol. 2009;84:524-526.

9. Weidauer H, Tilgen W, Adler D. Kaposi’s sarcoma of the larynx [in German]. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1986;65:389-391.

10. Basset A. Clinical aspects of Kaposi’s disease [in French]. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1984;77(4, pt 2):529-532.

11. Wlotzke U, Hohenleutner U, Landthaler M. Dermatoses in leg amputees [in German]. Hautarzt. 1996;47:493-501.

Issue
Cutis - 95(1)
Issue
Cutis - 95(1)
Page Number
E7-E9
Page Number
E7-E9
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Verrucous Kaposi Sarcoma in an HIV-Positive Man
Display Headline
Verrucous Kaposi Sarcoma in an HIV-Positive Man
Legacy Keywords
Kaposi sarcoma, verrucous, HIV, herpes virus 8
Legacy Keywords
Kaposi sarcoma, verrucous, HIV, herpes virus 8
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

A disturbing conversation with another health care provider

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/07/2019 - 12:09
Display Headline
A disturbing conversation with another health care provider

One of my pet peeves is when a patient or colleague speaks ill of another health care provider. I find it unbecoming behavior that often (though not always) speaks more to the character of the speaker than that of the object of anger/derision/dissatisfaction. I recently had the misfortune of interacting with a nurse practitioner who behaved in this manner. (The evidence of my hypocrisy does not escape me.)

A patient had been having some vague complaints for about 5 years, including myalgias, headaches, and fatigue. She remembers a tick bite that preceded the onset of symptoms. She tested negative for Lyme disease and other tick-borne illnesses multiple times, but after seeing many different doctors she finally saw an infectious disease doctor who often treats patients for what he diagnoses as a chronic Lyme infection. The patient was on antibiotics for about 5 years. But because she didn’t really feel any better, she started questioning the diagnosis.

Dr. Karmela K. Chan

I explained to the patient why I thought that fibromyalgia might explain her symptoms. She looked this up on the Internet and found that the disease described her symptoms completely. She was happy to stop antibiotic treatment. However, in the interest of leaving no stone unturned, I referred her to a neurologist for her headaches.

The nurse practitioner who evaluated her sent her for a brain single-photon emission computed tomography scan that showed “multifocal regions of decreased uptake, distribution suggestive of vasculitis or multi-infarct dementia.” The NP then informed the patient of this result, said it was consistent with CNS Lyme, and asked her to return to the infectious disease doctor who then put her back on oral antibiotics.

The patient brought this all to my attention, asking for an opinion. I thought she probably had small vessel changes because she had hyperlipidemia and was a heavy smoker. But I was curious about the decision to label this as CNS Lyme, so I thought I would touch base with the NP. What ensued was possibly one of the most disturbing conversations I’ve had with another health care provider since I started practice.

 

 

She didn’t think she needed a lumbar puncture to confirm her diagnosis. She hadn’t bothered to order Lyme serologies or to look for previous results. “We take the patient’s word for it,” she smugly told me. She had full confidence that her diagnosis was correct, because “we see this all the time.” When I said I thought, common things being common, that the cigarette smoking was the most likely culprit for the changes, her response was: “Common things being common, Lyme disease is pretty common around here.” On the question of why the patient was getting oral antibiotics rather than IV antibiotics per Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for CNS Lyme, the response I got was again, that she sees this “all the time, and they do respond to oral antibiotics.”

I think the worst part was that when I pointed out that the preponderance of other doctors (two primary care physicians, two infectious disease doctors, another neurologist, another rheumatologist, and myself) did not agree with the diagnosis, her reply was to say that “the ID docs around here are way too conservative when it comes to treating chronic Lyme.”

Of course, she could very well be correct in her diagnosis. However, the conceit with which she so readily accused the ID specialists of being “too conservative” when she clearly did not do the necessary work herself (LP, serologies, etc.) just rubs me the wrong way. Lazy and arrogant make a horrible combination.

I politely disagreed and ended the conversation, but I was so worked up about the situation that I decided to write about it, thereby demonstrating the same bad behavior I claim to dislike. I am afraid at this stage in my professional development magnanimity is not a quality that I yet possess. Hopefully, I will not have many opportunities to demonstrate my lack of it.

Dr. Chan practices rheumatology in Pawtucket, R.I.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Legacy Keywords
chronic Lyme, antibiotics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

One of my pet peeves is when a patient or colleague speaks ill of another health care provider. I find it unbecoming behavior that often (though not always) speaks more to the character of the speaker than that of the object of anger/derision/dissatisfaction. I recently had the misfortune of interacting with a nurse practitioner who behaved in this manner. (The evidence of my hypocrisy does not escape me.)

A patient had been having some vague complaints for about 5 years, including myalgias, headaches, and fatigue. She remembers a tick bite that preceded the onset of symptoms. She tested negative for Lyme disease and other tick-borne illnesses multiple times, but after seeing many different doctors she finally saw an infectious disease doctor who often treats patients for what he diagnoses as a chronic Lyme infection. The patient was on antibiotics for about 5 years. But because she didn’t really feel any better, she started questioning the diagnosis.

Dr. Karmela K. Chan

I explained to the patient why I thought that fibromyalgia might explain her symptoms. She looked this up on the Internet and found that the disease described her symptoms completely. She was happy to stop antibiotic treatment. However, in the interest of leaving no stone unturned, I referred her to a neurologist for her headaches.

The nurse practitioner who evaluated her sent her for a brain single-photon emission computed tomography scan that showed “multifocal regions of decreased uptake, distribution suggestive of vasculitis or multi-infarct dementia.” The NP then informed the patient of this result, said it was consistent with CNS Lyme, and asked her to return to the infectious disease doctor who then put her back on oral antibiotics.

The patient brought this all to my attention, asking for an opinion. I thought she probably had small vessel changes because she had hyperlipidemia and was a heavy smoker. But I was curious about the decision to label this as CNS Lyme, so I thought I would touch base with the NP. What ensued was possibly one of the most disturbing conversations I’ve had with another health care provider since I started practice.

 

 

She didn’t think she needed a lumbar puncture to confirm her diagnosis. She hadn’t bothered to order Lyme serologies or to look for previous results. “We take the patient’s word for it,” she smugly told me. She had full confidence that her diagnosis was correct, because “we see this all the time.” When I said I thought, common things being common, that the cigarette smoking was the most likely culprit for the changes, her response was: “Common things being common, Lyme disease is pretty common around here.” On the question of why the patient was getting oral antibiotics rather than IV antibiotics per Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for CNS Lyme, the response I got was again, that she sees this “all the time, and they do respond to oral antibiotics.”

I think the worst part was that when I pointed out that the preponderance of other doctors (two primary care physicians, two infectious disease doctors, another neurologist, another rheumatologist, and myself) did not agree with the diagnosis, her reply was to say that “the ID docs around here are way too conservative when it comes to treating chronic Lyme.”

Of course, she could very well be correct in her diagnosis. However, the conceit with which she so readily accused the ID specialists of being “too conservative” when she clearly did not do the necessary work herself (LP, serologies, etc.) just rubs me the wrong way. Lazy and arrogant make a horrible combination.

I politely disagreed and ended the conversation, but I was so worked up about the situation that I decided to write about it, thereby demonstrating the same bad behavior I claim to dislike. I am afraid at this stage in my professional development magnanimity is not a quality that I yet possess. Hopefully, I will not have many opportunities to demonstrate my lack of it.

Dr. Chan practices rheumatology in Pawtucket, R.I.

One of my pet peeves is when a patient or colleague speaks ill of another health care provider. I find it unbecoming behavior that often (though not always) speaks more to the character of the speaker than that of the object of anger/derision/dissatisfaction. I recently had the misfortune of interacting with a nurse practitioner who behaved in this manner. (The evidence of my hypocrisy does not escape me.)

A patient had been having some vague complaints for about 5 years, including myalgias, headaches, and fatigue. She remembers a tick bite that preceded the onset of symptoms. She tested negative for Lyme disease and other tick-borne illnesses multiple times, but after seeing many different doctors she finally saw an infectious disease doctor who often treats patients for what he diagnoses as a chronic Lyme infection. The patient was on antibiotics for about 5 years. But because she didn’t really feel any better, she started questioning the diagnosis.

Dr. Karmela K. Chan

I explained to the patient why I thought that fibromyalgia might explain her symptoms. She looked this up on the Internet and found that the disease described her symptoms completely. She was happy to stop antibiotic treatment. However, in the interest of leaving no stone unturned, I referred her to a neurologist for her headaches.

The nurse practitioner who evaluated her sent her for a brain single-photon emission computed tomography scan that showed “multifocal regions of decreased uptake, distribution suggestive of vasculitis or multi-infarct dementia.” The NP then informed the patient of this result, said it was consistent with CNS Lyme, and asked her to return to the infectious disease doctor who then put her back on oral antibiotics.

The patient brought this all to my attention, asking for an opinion. I thought she probably had small vessel changes because she had hyperlipidemia and was a heavy smoker. But I was curious about the decision to label this as CNS Lyme, so I thought I would touch base with the NP. What ensued was possibly one of the most disturbing conversations I’ve had with another health care provider since I started practice.

 

 

She didn’t think she needed a lumbar puncture to confirm her diagnosis. She hadn’t bothered to order Lyme serologies or to look for previous results. “We take the patient’s word for it,” she smugly told me. She had full confidence that her diagnosis was correct, because “we see this all the time.” When I said I thought, common things being common, that the cigarette smoking was the most likely culprit for the changes, her response was: “Common things being common, Lyme disease is pretty common around here.” On the question of why the patient was getting oral antibiotics rather than IV antibiotics per Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for CNS Lyme, the response I got was again, that she sees this “all the time, and they do respond to oral antibiotics.”

I think the worst part was that when I pointed out that the preponderance of other doctors (two primary care physicians, two infectious disease doctors, another neurologist, another rheumatologist, and myself) did not agree with the diagnosis, her reply was to say that “the ID docs around here are way too conservative when it comes to treating chronic Lyme.”

Of course, she could very well be correct in her diagnosis. However, the conceit with which she so readily accused the ID specialists of being “too conservative” when she clearly did not do the necessary work herself (LP, serologies, etc.) just rubs me the wrong way. Lazy and arrogant make a horrible combination.

I politely disagreed and ended the conversation, but I was so worked up about the situation that I decided to write about it, thereby demonstrating the same bad behavior I claim to dislike. I am afraid at this stage in my professional development magnanimity is not a quality that I yet possess. Hopefully, I will not have many opportunities to demonstrate my lack of it.

Dr. Chan practices rheumatology in Pawtucket, R.I.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
A disturbing conversation with another health care provider
Display Headline
A disturbing conversation with another health care provider
Legacy Keywords
chronic Lyme, antibiotics
Legacy Keywords
chronic Lyme, antibiotics
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Avoiding disillusionment

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 15:33
Display Headline
Avoiding disillusionment

The holiday season, despite the hustle and bustle, can be a time of reflection. Thanksgiving is a time to reflect on what you have. The secular version of Christmas is a deep plunge into materialism and getting the things you desire. Then come those New Year’s resolutions in which you swear off material things and promise yourself you will become the person you have always wanted to be.

For those in academic settings educating the next cohort of physicians, this time of year has its own rituals. Undergraduate and medical school applications are being reviewed. Medical students are interviewing for residencies. Match day for residents seeking subspecialty fellowships occurs in mid-December. The other residents are starting to interview for real jobs. Overall, a vast undertaking occurs in which talents and aspirations are matched with finite and practical opportunities.

My goal is to advocate for the health of children, so I am concerned about how well pediatrics attracts the best and brightest minds. The best training programs in the world are still going to produce mediocre doctors if we start with mediocre talent. The stakes in recruiting talent are huge. The Washington Post has been running a series on the disappearance of the middle class. Some articles have lamented that the finance sector has recently siphoned off the best and brightest minds to make money by pushing money, rather than creating new technology, products, and jobs (“A black hole for our best and brightest,” by Jim Tankersley on Dec. 14, 2014). My second concern is nourishing the ideals and aspirations of those physician seedlings. Few people keep all their New Year’s resolutions for the entire year, but even partial credit can be important progress in a balanced life.

First, we need to attract people to science. There is a recognized shortage of high school students going into STEM fields (science, technology, engineering, and math). Various programs have been created to attract high school students, and particularly women, to those fields (“Women flocking to statistics, the newly hot, high-tech field of data science,” by Brigid Schulte, the Washington Post, Dec. 19, 2014). This then needs to be reinforced in college. For instance, the analysis of big data in health care is a burgeoning field. We need statisticians who can do the work.

Then we need to attract people to medicine. I’ve been in a few conversations recently about a book titled “Doctored: The Disillusionment of the American Physician,” by Dr. Sandeep Jauhar. I haven’t read more than a few excerpts from the book. An abbreviated version is the author’s essay, “Why Doctors Are Sick of Their Profession,” in the Wall Street Journal (Aug. 29, 2014).

There were enough inaccuracies in that article to dissuade me from reading further, but your mileage may differ. There are data to both support and refute most of his assertions. I believe he is correct that there have been some Faustian bargains made by the past two generations of doctors. Medicine welcomed the improved revenues from Medicare and Medicaid coverage. Those programs improved access, justice, health outcomes, and especially doctors’ incomes, but at a steep price to society. The Golden Goose Dr. Jauhar cited was indeed killed. The following generation of doctors has had to deal with managed care, preapprovals, and denials of payment, along with other cost controls. It was irrational to think that all that money from the government to physicians was going to flow indefinitely without strings. In a related development, the resulting paperwork has crushed solo office practice. Rather than being entrepreneurs, recently boarded pediatricians are trending toward larger group practices and salaried positions. So that affects the degree of independence in a medical career.

In pediatrics, physicians invest considerable time to open career paths into subspecialty areas that interest them, even if the income and lifestyle aren’t better and don’t justify the time and expense of further training. Pediatric hospital medicine is progressing toward becoming a boarded subspecialty with 2-year fellowships. Will that attract the best and brightest of the residents?

Continuing medical education is needed to maintain a knowledge base and a skill set. I assert there also needs to be continuing examination and reinforcement of one’s ideals and life goals. As a pediatrician, I am biased toward believing that maintaining a recommended daily allowance of that activity outperforms making New Year’s resolutions. We all know that crash diets rarely work in the long run.

What practical steps can be taken in the pediatrician’s office? Put up posters that encourage STEM education. Ask adolescents about their plans. The health and life expectancy of your patient will be related far more to his or her career choice than to the discovery of the next medicine to treat chronic hepatitis C. Spending just a moment of each adolescent well visit to explore his/her aspirations also may be just the medicine you need to avoid disillusionment. Maybe you will even inspire a bright teenager to become a pediatrician.

 

 

Dr. Powell is a pediatric hospitalist and clinical ethics consultant living in St. Louis. He is also listserv moderator for the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Hospital Medicine. E-mail him at [email protected].

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
Beyond the White Coat, disillusionment, CME, medical students, new physicians, jobs, adolescentsw
Sections

The holiday season, despite the hustle and bustle, can be a time of reflection. Thanksgiving is a time to reflect on what you have. The secular version of Christmas is a deep plunge into materialism and getting the things you desire. Then come those New Year’s resolutions in which you swear off material things and promise yourself you will become the person you have always wanted to be.

For those in academic settings educating the next cohort of physicians, this time of year has its own rituals. Undergraduate and medical school applications are being reviewed. Medical students are interviewing for residencies. Match day for residents seeking subspecialty fellowships occurs in mid-December. The other residents are starting to interview for real jobs. Overall, a vast undertaking occurs in which talents and aspirations are matched with finite and practical opportunities.

My goal is to advocate for the health of children, so I am concerned about how well pediatrics attracts the best and brightest minds. The best training programs in the world are still going to produce mediocre doctors if we start with mediocre talent. The stakes in recruiting talent are huge. The Washington Post has been running a series on the disappearance of the middle class. Some articles have lamented that the finance sector has recently siphoned off the best and brightest minds to make money by pushing money, rather than creating new technology, products, and jobs (“A black hole for our best and brightest,” by Jim Tankersley on Dec. 14, 2014). My second concern is nourishing the ideals and aspirations of those physician seedlings. Few people keep all their New Year’s resolutions for the entire year, but even partial credit can be important progress in a balanced life.

First, we need to attract people to science. There is a recognized shortage of high school students going into STEM fields (science, technology, engineering, and math). Various programs have been created to attract high school students, and particularly women, to those fields (“Women flocking to statistics, the newly hot, high-tech field of data science,” by Brigid Schulte, the Washington Post, Dec. 19, 2014). This then needs to be reinforced in college. For instance, the analysis of big data in health care is a burgeoning field. We need statisticians who can do the work.

Then we need to attract people to medicine. I’ve been in a few conversations recently about a book titled “Doctored: The Disillusionment of the American Physician,” by Dr. Sandeep Jauhar. I haven’t read more than a few excerpts from the book. An abbreviated version is the author’s essay, “Why Doctors Are Sick of Their Profession,” in the Wall Street Journal (Aug. 29, 2014).

There were enough inaccuracies in that article to dissuade me from reading further, but your mileage may differ. There are data to both support and refute most of his assertions. I believe he is correct that there have been some Faustian bargains made by the past two generations of doctors. Medicine welcomed the improved revenues from Medicare and Medicaid coverage. Those programs improved access, justice, health outcomes, and especially doctors’ incomes, but at a steep price to society. The Golden Goose Dr. Jauhar cited was indeed killed. The following generation of doctors has had to deal with managed care, preapprovals, and denials of payment, along with other cost controls. It was irrational to think that all that money from the government to physicians was going to flow indefinitely without strings. In a related development, the resulting paperwork has crushed solo office practice. Rather than being entrepreneurs, recently boarded pediatricians are trending toward larger group practices and salaried positions. So that affects the degree of independence in a medical career.

In pediatrics, physicians invest considerable time to open career paths into subspecialty areas that interest them, even if the income and lifestyle aren’t better and don’t justify the time and expense of further training. Pediatric hospital medicine is progressing toward becoming a boarded subspecialty with 2-year fellowships. Will that attract the best and brightest of the residents?

Continuing medical education is needed to maintain a knowledge base and a skill set. I assert there also needs to be continuing examination and reinforcement of one’s ideals and life goals. As a pediatrician, I am biased toward believing that maintaining a recommended daily allowance of that activity outperforms making New Year’s resolutions. We all know that crash diets rarely work in the long run.

What practical steps can be taken in the pediatrician’s office? Put up posters that encourage STEM education. Ask adolescents about their plans. The health and life expectancy of your patient will be related far more to his or her career choice than to the discovery of the next medicine to treat chronic hepatitis C. Spending just a moment of each adolescent well visit to explore his/her aspirations also may be just the medicine you need to avoid disillusionment. Maybe you will even inspire a bright teenager to become a pediatrician.

 

 

Dr. Powell is a pediatric hospitalist and clinical ethics consultant living in St. Louis. He is also listserv moderator for the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Hospital Medicine. E-mail him at [email protected].

The holiday season, despite the hustle and bustle, can be a time of reflection. Thanksgiving is a time to reflect on what you have. The secular version of Christmas is a deep plunge into materialism and getting the things you desire. Then come those New Year’s resolutions in which you swear off material things and promise yourself you will become the person you have always wanted to be.

For those in academic settings educating the next cohort of physicians, this time of year has its own rituals. Undergraduate and medical school applications are being reviewed. Medical students are interviewing for residencies. Match day for residents seeking subspecialty fellowships occurs in mid-December. The other residents are starting to interview for real jobs. Overall, a vast undertaking occurs in which talents and aspirations are matched with finite and practical opportunities.

My goal is to advocate for the health of children, so I am concerned about how well pediatrics attracts the best and brightest minds. The best training programs in the world are still going to produce mediocre doctors if we start with mediocre talent. The stakes in recruiting talent are huge. The Washington Post has been running a series on the disappearance of the middle class. Some articles have lamented that the finance sector has recently siphoned off the best and brightest minds to make money by pushing money, rather than creating new technology, products, and jobs (“A black hole for our best and brightest,” by Jim Tankersley on Dec. 14, 2014). My second concern is nourishing the ideals and aspirations of those physician seedlings. Few people keep all their New Year’s resolutions for the entire year, but even partial credit can be important progress in a balanced life.

First, we need to attract people to science. There is a recognized shortage of high school students going into STEM fields (science, technology, engineering, and math). Various programs have been created to attract high school students, and particularly women, to those fields (“Women flocking to statistics, the newly hot, high-tech field of data science,” by Brigid Schulte, the Washington Post, Dec. 19, 2014). This then needs to be reinforced in college. For instance, the analysis of big data in health care is a burgeoning field. We need statisticians who can do the work.

Then we need to attract people to medicine. I’ve been in a few conversations recently about a book titled “Doctored: The Disillusionment of the American Physician,” by Dr. Sandeep Jauhar. I haven’t read more than a few excerpts from the book. An abbreviated version is the author’s essay, “Why Doctors Are Sick of Their Profession,” in the Wall Street Journal (Aug. 29, 2014).

There were enough inaccuracies in that article to dissuade me from reading further, but your mileage may differ. There are data to both support and refute most of his assertions. I believe he is correct that there have been some Faustian bargains made by the past two generations of doctors. Medicine welcomed the improved revenues from Medicare and Medicaid coverage. Those programs improved access, justice, health outcomes, and especially doctors’ incomes, but at a steep price to society. The Golden Goose Dr. Jauhar cited was indeed killed. The following generation of doctors has had to deal with managed care, preapprovals, and denials of payment, along with other cost controls. It was irrational to think that all that money from the government to physicians was going to flow indefinitely without strings. In a related development, the resulting paperwork has crushed solo office practice. Rather than being entrepreneurs, recently boarded pediatricians are trending toward larger group practices and salaried positions. So that affects the degree of independence in a medical career.

In pediatrics, physicians invest considerable time to open career paths into subspecialty areas that interest them, even if the income and lifestyle aren’t better and don’t justify the time and expense of further training. Pediatric hospital medicine is progressing toward becoming a boarded subspecialty with 2-year fellowships. Will that attract the best and brightest of the residents?

Continuing medical education is needed to maintain a knowledge base and a skill set. I assert there also needs to be continuing examination and reinforcement of one’s ideals and life goals. As a pediatrician, I am biased toward believing that maintaining a recommended daily allowance of that activity outperforms making New Year’s resolutions. We all know that crash diets rarely work in the long run.

What practical steps can be taken in the pediatrician’s office? Put up posters that encourage STEM education. Ask adolescents about their plans. The health and life expectancy of your patient will be related far more to his or her career choice than to the discovery of the next medicine to treat chronic hepatitis C. Spending just a moment of each adolescent well visit to explore his/her aspirations also may be just the medicine you need to avoid disillusionment. Maybe you will even inspire a bright teenager to become a pediatrician.

 

 

Dr. Powell is a pediatric hospitalist and clinical ethics consultant living in St. Louis. He is also listserv moderator for the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Hospital Medicine. E-mail him at [email protected].

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Avoiding disillusionment
Display Headline
Avoiding disillusionment
Legacy Keywords
Beyond the White Coat, disillusionment, CME, medical students, new physicians, jobs, adolescentsw
Legacy Keywords
Beyond the White Coat, disillusionment, CME, medical students, new physicians, jobs, adolescentsw
Sections
Disallow All Ads

Vitamin D deficiency

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 14:20
Display Headline
Vitamin D deficiency

Most physicians can recall the impressive x-ray of the rickets rosary or the flared radial head seen in medical school. On almost every exam, there was an a reference to the infant who was solely breastfed which led to seizures and abnormal finding on physical exam, but in practice, most of us would be hard pressed to recall an infant that presented with any of those symptoms.

With recent guideline changes to require that all infants be supplemented with vitamin D from birth, extreme presentations of vitamin D deficiency such as rickets are rare, but has vitamin D deficiency really gone away?

Dr. Francine Pearce

It is hard to pin down the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in adolescents; it depends on the cut-off you use. In one study of 307 healthy Boston adolescents presenting for primary care, 24% were vitamin D deficient (serum 25[OH]D level, ≤15 ng/mL); of these 4.6% were severely vitamin D deficient (25[OH]D level, ≤8 ng/mL) (Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2004;158:531-7). Broader studies have demonstrated the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency to be 7% for adolescent males aged 14-18 years and 10% for females that age (National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief No. 59, March 2011). This makes sense given that the natural sources of vitamin D are oily fishes such as salmon and sardines, cod liver oil, liver, egg yolk, and organ meat, none of which are big favorites in the adolescent population.

Other factors that contribute to the rise in D deficiency are the promotion of sunscreen use to block UV rays which are essential for cutaneous synthesis. Skin cancer prevention and the promotion of the use of sunscreen and a direct correlation of lower vitamin D levels have been identified(Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;88:1519-27).

Obesity plays a unique role, in that it causes sequestration of the vitamin D into the fat cells. With the dramatic rise in adolescent obesity plus poor nutritional intake, vitamin D deficiency is the natural result.

 

 

Clinically it is easy for vitamin D deficiency to go unnoticed. Bones have mineralized, so the typical changes seen in the infant do not occur in the adolescent. But what is apparent is the generalized fatigue, muscle or bone pain, and increased upper respiratory infections. Adolescents with low vitamin D levels also are at increased risk for hypertension, elevated blood sugars, and metabolic syndrome.

Screening for vitamin D deficiency is imperative for the adolescent age group who have been identified to have risk factors because the deficiency can compound other illnesses, prevents appropriate bone mineralization, and decreases the patient’s generalized sense of well-being. Serum 25(OH)D has a long half-life and is a better predictor of serum levels (Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;88:582S-6S).

Supplementation of Vitamin D should be in the form of D3, which has been shown to be more efficient in raising the serum level (Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012;95:1357-64), and dose will vary depending on the severity. Complimenting it with a calcium supplement also will improve bone mineralization and absorption.

Vitamin D deficiency is not a thing of the past. A simple nutritional review with every encounter allows for the educational opportunity for healthy eating and appropriate supplementation. The patient with recurrent upper respiratory infections should be encouraged to maintain a daily intake of at least 600 IU, but in patients with increased risk factors an actual blood test should be done to determine the amount that should be prescribed.

Dr. Pearce is a pediatrician in Frankfort, Ill. She had no relevant financial disclosures. E-mail her at [email protected]. Scan this QR code or go to pediatricnews.com to view similar articles.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Legacy Keywords
Vitamin D, Francine Pearce, deficiency, rickets, metabolic disease, upper respiratory infections, muscle pain, aches
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Most physicians can recall the impressive x-ray of the rickets rosary or the flared radial head seen in medical school. On almost every exam, there was an a reference to the infant who was solely breastfed which led to seizures and abnormal finding on physical exam, but in practice, most of us would be hard pressed to recall an infant that presented with any of those symptoms.

With recent guideline changes to require that all infants be supplemented with vitamin D from birth, extreme presentations of vitamin D deficiency such as rickets are rare, but has vitamin D deficiency really gone away?

Dr. Francine Pearce

It is hard to pin down the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in adolescents; it depends on the cut-off you use. In one study of 307 healthy Boston adolescents presenting for primary care, 24% were vitamin D deficient (serum 25[OH]D level, ≤15 ng/mL); of these 4.6% were severely vitamin D deficient (25[OH]D level, ≤8 ng/mL) (Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2004;158:531-7). Broader studies have demonstrated the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency to be 7% for adolescent males aged 14-18 years and 10% for females that age (National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief No. 59, March 2011). This makes sense given that the natural sources of vitamin D are oily fishes such as salmon and sardines, cod liver oil, liver, egg yolk, and organ meat, none of which are big favorites in the adolescent population.

Other factors that contribute to the rise in D deficiency are the promotion of sunscreen use to block UV rays which are essential for cutaneous synthesis. Skin cancer prevention and the promotion of the use of sunscreen and a direct correlation of lower vitamin D levels have been identified(Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;88:1519-27).

Obesity plays a unique role, in that it causes sequestration of the vitamin D into the fat cells. With the dramatic rise in adolescent obesity plus poor nutritional intake, vitamin D deficiency is the natural result.

 

 

Clinically it is easy for vitamin D deficiency to go unnoticed. Bones have mineralized, so the typical changes seen in the infant do not occur in the adolescent. But what is apparent is the generalized fatigue, muscle or bone pain, and increased upper respiratory infections. Adolescents with low vitamin D levels also are at increased risk for hypertension, elevated blood sugars, and metabolic syndrome.

Screening for vitamin D deficiency is imperative for the adolescent age group who have been identified to have risk factors because the deficiency can compound other illnesses, prevents appropriate bone mineralization, and decreases the patient’s generalized sense of well-being. Serum 25(OH)D has a long half-life and is a better predictor of serum levels (Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;88:582S-6S).

Supplementation of Vitamin D should be in the form of D3, which has been shown to be more efficient in raising the serum level (Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012;95:1357-64), and dose will vary depending on the severity. Complimenting it with a calcium supplement also will improve bone mineralization and absorption.

Vitamin D deficiency is not a thing of the past. A simple nutritional review with every encounter allows for the educational opportunity for healthy eating and appropriate supplementation. The patient with recurrent upper respiratory infections should be encouraged to maintain a daily intake of at least 600 IU, but in patients with increased risk factors an actual blood test should be done to determine the amount that should be prescribed.

Dr. Pearce is a pediatrician in Frankfort, Ill. She had no relevant financial disclosures. E-mail her at [email protected]. Scan this QR code or go to pediatricnews.com to view similar articles.

Most physicians can recall the impressive x-ray of the rickets rosary or the flared radial head seen in medical school. On almost every exam, there was an a reference to the infant who was solely breastfed which led to seizures and abnormal finding on physical exam, but in practice, most of us would be hard pressed to recall an infant that presented with any of those symptoms.

With recent guideline changes to require that all infants be supplemented with vitamin D from birth, extreme presentations of vitamin D deficiency such as rickets are rare, but has vitamin D deficiency really gone away?

Dr. Francine Pearce

It is hard to pin down the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in adolescents; it depends on the cut-off you use. In one study of 307 healthy Boston adolescents presenting for primary care, 24% were vitamin D deficient (serum 25[OH]D level, ≤15 ng/mL); of these 4.6% were severely vitamin D deficient (25[OH]D level, ≤8 ng/mL) (Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2004;158:531-7). Broader studies have demonstrated the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency to be 7% for adolescent males aged 14-18 years and 10% for females that age (National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief No. 59, March 2011). This makes sense given that the natural sources of vitamin D are oily fishes such as salmon and sardines, cod liver oil, liver, egg yolk, and organ meat, none of which are big favorites in the adolescent population.

Other factors that contribute to the rise in D deficiency are the promotion of sunscreen use to block UV rays which are essential for cutaneous synthesis. Skin cancer prevention and the promotion of the use of sunscreen and a direct correlation of lower vitamin D levels have been identified(Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;88:1519-27).

Obesity plays a unique role, in that it causes sequestration of the vitamin D into the fat cells. With the dramatic rise in adolescent obesity plus poor nutritional intake, vitamin D deficiency is the natural result.

 

 

Clinically it is easy for vitamin D deficiency to go unnoticed. Bones have mineralized, so the typical changes seen in the infant do not occur in the adolescent. But what is apparent is the generalized fatigue, muscle or bone pain, and increased upper respiratory infections. Adolescents with low vitamin D levels also are at increased risk for hypertension, elevated blood sugars, and metabolic syndrome.

Screening for vitamin D deficiency is imperative for the adolescent age group who have been identified to have risk factors because the deficiency can compound other illnesses, prevents appropriate bone mineralization, and decreases the patient’s generalized sense of well-being. Serum 25(OH)D has a long half-life and is a better predictor of serum levels (Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;88:582S-6S).

Supplementation of Vitamin D should be in the form of D3, which has been shown to be more efficient in raising the serum level (Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012;95:1357-64), and dose will vary depending on the severity. Complimenting it with a calcium supplement also will improve bone mineralization and absorption.

Vitamin D deficiency is not a thing of the past. A simple nutritional review with every encounter allows for the educational opportunity for healthy eating and appropriate supplementation. The patient with recurrent upper respiratory infections should be encouraged to maintain a daily intake of at least 600 IU, but in patients with increased risk factors an actual blood test should be done to determine the amount that should be prescribed.

Dr. Pearce is a pediatrician in Frankfort, Ill. She had no relevant financial disclosures. E-mail her at [email protected]. Scan this QR code or go to pediatricnews.com to view similar articles.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Vitamin D deficiency
Display Headline
Vitamin D deficiency
Legacy Keywords
Vitamin D, Francine Pearce, deficiency, rickets, metabolic disease, upper respiratory infections, muscle pain, aches
Legacy Keywords
Vitamin D, Francine Pearce, deficiency, rickets, metabolic disease, upper respiratory infections, muscle pain, aches
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

New and Noteworthy Information—January 2015

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/07/2019 - 09:55
Display Headline
New and Noteworthy Information—January 2015

Diabetes prevention and glucose control in midlife may protect against late-life cognitive decline, according to a study published December 2 in Annals of Internal Medicine. Researchers analyzed data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC). The investigators compared the amount of cognitive decline associated with aging with the amount of decline found in the ARIC participants. The study authors determined that participants with poorly controlled diabetes had 19% more cognitive decline than expected. They also observed declines for participants with controlled diabetes and prediabetes. “Knowing that the risk for cognitive impairments begins with diabetes and other risk factors in midlife can be a strong motivator for patients and their doctors to adopt and maintain long-term healthy practices,” stated the researchers.

The likelihood of receiving a clinical cognitive evaluation in elderly individuals with dementia depends on patient-specific factors such as severity of cognitive impairment and current marital status, according to a study published online ahead of print November 26 in Neurology. The investigation was part of the Health and Retirement Study. Eight hundred forty-five people age 70 and older were evaluated for dementia, and 297 met the criteria for dementia. Of those people, 45% had seen a doctor about their memory problems, compared with 5% of those with memory and thinking problems that did not meet the criteria for dementia, and 1% of those with normal memory and thinking skills. People who were married were more than twice as likely to undergo screening as people who were not married.

Stimwave Technologies (Miami Beach, Florida) has received FDA clearance to market the Stimwave Freedom Spinal Cord Stimulator System, a wireless, microtechnology neuromodulation device for the relief of chronic back pain and leg pain. The device, a long-term implant, is between 2 and 11 cm long and can be inserted through a standard needle. The Stimwave Freedom Spinal Cord Stimulator System also eliminates the need for long wires to be tunneled through the body and connected to the battery source. Patients who receive the system can undergo whole-body 3-T or 1.5-T MRI without removing the implant. The Stimwave technology is also fixed in place by an anchor that allows it to move only when the body moves. The device contains no internal batteries or toxic materials.

Chronic impairment of glymphatic pathway function after traumatic brain injury (TBI) may be a key factor that renders the post-traumatic brain vulnerable to tau aggregation and the onset of neurodegeneration, according to a study published December 3 in Journal of Neuroscience. Previously, investigators defined a network of paravascular channels called the glymphatic pathway that facilitates the clearance of solutes such as amyloid-β from the brain. The researchers demonstrated that extracellular tau in mice is cleared from the brain along the paravascular pathways. After TBI, glymphatic pathway function was reduced by 60%, and this impairment persisted for at least one month after injury. Knockout of the gene encoding the astroglial water channel aquaporin-4 exacerbated glymphatic pathway dysfunction after TBI and promoted the development of neurofibrillary pathology and neurodegeneration in the post-traumatic brain.

In patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA), CT evidence of acute ischemia alone or acute ischemia with chronic ischemia is associated with increased subsequent stroke risk within 90 days, according to a study published online ahead of print December 4 in Stroke. Of 2,028 patients who received CT scans within 24 hours of a TIA, 814 (40.1%) had brain damage resulting from ischemia. In addition, 3.4% of the people in the study group had a subsequent stroke within 90 days, and 25% of patients with CT scans showing three types of damage to their brain had strokes. “These findings should prompt physicians to be more aggressive in managing patients with TIA or nondisabling stroke who are diagnosed with acute ischemia, especially if there is additional chronic ischemia and microangiopathy,” the researchers said.

People who have sleep apnea or spend less time in deep sleep may be more likely to have changes in the brain that are associated with dementia, according to a study published December 10 in Neurology. A total of 167 Japanese–American men had sleep tests in their homes at an average age of 84. All men were followed until they died at an average of six years later. Autopsies were conducted on their brains to look for microinfarcts. Of the 41 men who spent the least sleep time with low blood oxygen levels, four had microinfarcts in the brain. Fourteen of the 42 men with the most sleep time with low blood oxygen levels had the abnormalities; thus, they were nearly four times more likely to develop brain damage.

 

 

Brains affected by autism share a pattern of increased immune responses, according to a data analysis published December 10 in Nature Communications. The researchers examined gene expression in samples from two tissue banks, comparing gene expression in people with autism with that in controls without the condition. Data from 104 brain samples from 72 individuals were analyzed. The investigators focused their analysis on microglial cells. In the brains with autism, the microglial cells appeared to be perpetually activated, and their genes for inflammation responses were activated. The results highlight “the lack of current understanding about how innate immunity controls neural circuits,” stated the study authors. Given the known genetic contributors to autism, inflammation is unlikely to be its root cause, they added.

Compared with placebo, progesterone did not improve outcomes when administered to patients with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI), according to a study published online ahead of print December 10 in the New England Journal of Medicine. Patients were randomly assigned to IV progesterone or placebo, and study treatment was initiated within four hours after injury and administered for 96 hours. The trial was stopped for futility. The researchers found no significant difference between the progesterone group and the placebo group in the proportion of patients with a favorable outcome. Favorable outcomes occurred in 51% of patients who received progesterone and in 56% of those who received placebo. Mortality after six months was 18.8% for participants receiving progesterone and 15.7% for those receiving placebo. Phlebitis was more common in the progesterone group.

Learning-related brain activity in patients with Parkinson’s disease improves as much in response to placebo as to medication, according to a study published in the December issue of Nature Neuroscience. For the study, researchers used functional MRI to scan the brains of 18 patients with Parkinson’s disease as they played a computer game that measures reward learning. In the game, participants discover through trial and error which of two symbols is more likely to lead to a better outcome. Participants played the game when they were not taking medication, when they took medication, and when they took placebo. The researchers found that the dopamine-rich areas of the brain associated with reward learning became equally active when patients took either the real medication or the placebo.

Oral fingolimod may improve outcomes for patients with acute and anterior cerebral circulation occlusion stroke, according to a study published online ahead of print December 8 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The researchers conducted an open-label, evaluator-blinded, parallel-group clinical pilot trial of 22 patients with anterior cerebral circulation occlusion, among whom stroke onset had occurred more than 4.5 hours previously. Participants received standard management alone or standard management plus 0.5 mg of oral fingolimod per day for three consecutive days. Patients receiving fingolimod had lower circulating lymphocyte counts, milder neurologic deficits, and better recovery of neurologic functions. Neurologic rehabilitation was faster among participants who received fingolimod. In addition, enlargement of lesion size was less pronounced between baseline and day seven among patients who received fingolimod.

Migraine headache may double the risk of Bell’s palsy, according to a study published online ahead of print December 17 in Neurology. Two groups of 136,704 people age 18 and older, one group with migraine and one without, were followed for an average of three years. During that time, 671 people in the migraine group and 365 people in the control group were diagnosed with Bell’s palsy. Participants with migraine were twice as likely to develop Bell’s palsy, even after researchers accounted for other factors that could increase the risk of the condition, such as sex, high blood pressure, and diabetes. “Infection, inflammation, or heart and vascular problems could be shared causes for these diseases,” stated the researchers.

Struggling to balance on one leg for 20 seconds or longer is linked to an increased risk for small blood vessel damage in the brain and reduced cognitive function in healthy people with no clinical symptoms, according to a study published online ahead of print December 18 in Stroke. Investigators examined 841 women and 546 men with an average age of 67. To measure one-leg standing time, participants stood with their eyes open and raised one leg. In all, 34.5% of participants with more than two lacunar infarction lesions had trouble balancing, 16% of people with one lacunar infarction lesion had trouble balancing, 30% of participants with more than two microbleed lesions had trouble balancing, and 15.3% of people with one microbleed lesion had trouble balancing.

 

 

Kimberly D. Williams

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 23(1)
Publications
Page Number
4-5
Legacy Keywords
Kimberly D. Williams, Neurology Reviews, TBI, chronic pain, cognitive decline, migraine
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Diabetes prevention and glucose control in midlife may protect against late-life cognitive decline, according to a study published December 2 in Annals of Internal Medicine. Researchers analyzed data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC). The investigators compared the amount of cognitive decline associated with aging with the amount of decline found in the ARIC participants. The study authors determined that participants with poorly controlled diabetes had 19% more cognitive decline than expected. They also observed declines for participants with controlled diabetes and prediabetes. “Knowing that the risk for cognitive impairments begins with diabetes and other risk factors in midlife can be a strong motivator for patients and their doctors to adopt and maintain long-term healthy practices,” stated the researchers.

The likelihood of receiving a clinical cognitive evaluation in elderly individuals with dementia depends on patient-specific factors such as severity of cognitive impairment and current marital status, according to a study published online ahead of print November 26 in Neurology. The investigation was part of the Health and Retirement Study. Eight hundred forty-five people age 70 and older were evaluated for dementia, and 297 met the criteria for dementia. Of those people, 45% had seen a doctor about their memory problems, compared with 5% of those with memory and thinking problems that did not meet the criteria for dementia, and 1% of those with normal memory and thinking skills. People who were married were more than twice as likely to undergo screening as people who were not married.

Stimwave Technologies (Miami Beach, Florida) has received FDA clearance to market the Stimwave Freedom Spinal Cord Stimulator System, a wireless, microtechnology neuromodulation device for the relief of chronic back pain and leg pain. The device, a long-term implant, is between 2 and 11 cm long and can be inserted through a standard needle. The Stimwave Freedom Spinal Cord Stimulator System also eliminates the need for long wires to be tunneled through the body and connected to the battery source. Patients who receive the system can undergo whole-body 3-T or 1.5-T MRI without removing the implant. The Stimwave technology is also fixed in place by an anchor that allows it to move only when the body moves. The device contains no internal batteries or toxic materials.

Chronic impairment of glymphatic pathway function after traumatic brain injury (TBI) may be a key factor that renders the post-traumatic brain vulnerable to tau aggregation and the onset of neurodegeneration, according to a study published December 3 in Journal of Neuroscience. Previously, investigators defined a network of paravascular channels called the glymphatic pathway that facilitates the clearance of solutes such as amyloid-β from the brain. The researchers demonstrated that extracellular tau in mice is cleared from the brain along the paravascular pathways. After TBI, glymphatic pathway function was reduced by 60%, and this impairment persisted for at least one month after injury. Knockout of the gene encoding the astroglial water channel aquaporin-4 exacerbated glymphatic pathway dysfunction after TBI and promoted the development of neurofibrillary pathology and neurodegeneration in the post-traumatic brain.

In patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA), CT evidence of acute ischemia alone or acute ischemia with chronic ischemia is associated with increased subsequent stroke risk within 90 days, according to a study published online ahead of print December 4 in Stroke. Of 2,028 patients who received CT scans within 24 hours of a TIA, 814 (40.1%) had brain damage resulting from ischemia. In addition, 3.4% of the people in the study group had a subsequent stroke within 90 days, and 25% of patients with CT scans showing three types of damage to their brain had strokes. “These findings should prompt physicians to be more aggressive in managing patients with TIA or nondisabling stroke who are diagnosed with acute ischemia, especially if there is additional chronic ischemia and microangiopathy,” the researchers said.

People who have sleep apnea or spend less time in deep sleep may be more likely to have changes in the brain that are associated with dementia, according to a study published December 10 in Neurology. A total of 167 Japanese–American men had sleep tests in their homes at an average age of 84. All men were followed until they died at an average of six years later. Autopsies were conducted on their brains to look for microinfarcts. Of the 41 men who spent the least sleep time with low blood oxygen levels, four had microinfarcts in the brain. Fourteen of the 42 men with the most sleep time with low blood oxygen levels had the abnormalities; thus, they were nearly four times more likely to develop brain damage.

 

 

Brains affected by autism share a pattern of increased immune responses, according to a data analysis published December 10 in Nature Communications. The researchers examined gene expression in samples from two tissue banks, comparing gene expression in people with autism with that in controls without the condition. Data from 104 brain samples from 72 individuals were analyzed. The investigators focused their analysis on microglial cells. In the brains with autism, the microglial cells appeared to be perpetually activated, and their genes for inflammation responses were activated. The results highlight “the lack of current understanding about how innate immunity controls neural circuits,” stated the study authors. Given the known genetic contributors to autism, inflammation is unlikely to be its root cause, they added.

Compared with placebo, progesterone did not improve outcomes when administered to patients with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI), according to a study published online ahead of print December 10 in the New England Journal of Medicine. Patients were randomly assigned to IV progesterone or placebo, and study treatment was initiated within four hours after injury and administered for 96 hours. The trial was stopped for futility. The researchers found no significant difference between the progesterone group and the placebo group in the proportion of patients with a favorable outcome. Favorable outcomes occurred in 51% of patients who received progesterone and in 56% of those who received placebo. Mortality after six months was 18.8% for participants receiving progesterone and 15.7% for those receiving placebo. Phlebitis was more common in the progesterone group.

Learning-related brain activity in patients with Parkinson’s disease improves as much in response to placebo as to medication, according to a study published in the December issue of Nature Neuroscience. For the study, researchers used functional MRI to scan the brains of 18 patients with Parkinson’s disease as they played a computer game that measures reward learning. In the game, participants discover through trial and error which of two symbols is more likely to lead to a better outcome. Participants played the game when they were not taking medication, when they took medication, and when they took placebo. The researchers found that the dopamine-rich areas of the brain associated with reward learning became equally active when patients took either the real medication or the placebo.

Oral fingolimod may improve outcomes for patients with acute and anterior cerebral circulation occlusion stroke, according to a study published online ahead of print December 8 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The researchers conducted an open-label, evaluator-blinded, parallel-group clinical pilot trial of 22 patients with anterior cerebral circulation occlusion, among whom stroke onset had occurred more than 4.5 hours previously. Participants received standard management alone or standard management plus 0.5 mg of oral fingolimod per day for three consecutive days. Patients receiving fingolimod had lower circulating lymphocyte counts, milder neurologic deficits, and better recovery of neurologic functions. Neurologic rehabilitation was faster among participants who received fingolimod. In addition, enlargement of lesion size was less pronounced between baseline and day seven among patients who received fingolimod.

Migraine headache may double the risk of Bell’s palsy, according to a study published online ahead of print December 17 in Neurology. Two groups of 136,704 people age 18 and older, one group with migraine and one without, were followed for an average of three years. During that time, 671 people in the migraine group and 365 people in the control group were diagnosed with Bell’s palsy. Participants with migraine were twice as likely to develop Bell’s palsy, even after researchers accounted for other factors that could increase the risk of the condition, such as sex, high blood pressure, and diabetes. “Infection, inflammation, or heart and vascular problems could be shared causes for these diseases,” stated the researchers.

Struggling to balance on one leg for 20 seconds or longer is linked to an increased risk for small blood vessel damage in the brain and reduced cognitive function in healthy people with no clinical symptoms, according to a study published online ahead of print December 18 in Stroke. Investigators examined 841 women and 546 men with an average age of 67. To measure one-leg standing time, participants stood with their eyes open and raised one leg. In all, 34.5% of participants with more than two lacunar infarction lesions had trouble balancing, 16% of people with one lacunar infarction lesion had trouble balancing, 30% of participants with more than two microbleed lesions had trouble balancing, and 15.3% of people with one microbleed lesion had trouble balancing.

 

 

Kimberly D. Williams

Diabetes prevention and glucose control in midlife may protect against late-life cognitive decline, according to a study published December 2 in Annals of Internal Medicine. Researchers analyzed data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC). The investigators compared the amount of cognitive decline associated with aging with the amount of decline found in the ARIC participants. The study authors determined that participants with poorly controlled diabetes had 19% more cognitive decline than expected. They also observed declines for participants with controlled diabetes and prediabetes. “Knowing that the risk for cognitive impairments begins with diabetes and other risk factors in midlife can be a strong motivator for patients and their doctors to adopt and maintain long-term healthy practices,” stated the researchers.

The likelihood of receiving a clinical cognitive evaluation in elderly individuals with dementia depends on patient-specific factors such as severity of cognitive impairment and current marital status, according to a study published online ahead of print November 26 in Neurology. The investigation was part of the Health and Retirement Study. Eight hundred forty-five people age 70 and older were evaluated for dementia, and 297 met the criteria for dementia. Of those people, 45% had seen a doctor about their memory problems, compared with 5% of those with memory and thinking problems that did not meet the criteria for dementia, and 1% of those with normal memory and thinking skills. People who were married were more than twice as likely to undergo screening as people who were not married.

Stimwave Technologies (Miami Beach, Florida) has received FDA clearance to market the Stimwave Freedom Spinal Cord Stimulator System, a wireless, microtechnology neuromodulation device for the relief of chronic back pain and leg pain. The device, a long-term implant, is between 2 and 11 cm long and can be inserted through a standard needle. The Stimwave Freedom Spinal Cord Stimulator System also eliminates the need for long wires to be tunneled through the body and connected to the battery source. Patients who receive the system can undergo whole-body 3-T or 1.5-T MRI without removing the implant. The Stimwave technology is also fixed in place by an anchor that allows it to move only when the body moves. The device contains no internal batteries or toxic materials.

Chronic impairment of glymphatic pathway function after traumatic brain injury (TBI) may be a key factor that renders the post-traumatic brain vulnerable to tau aggregation and the onset of neurodegeneration, according to a study published December 3 in Journal of Neuroscience. Previously, investigators defined a network of paravascular channels called the glymphatic pathway that facilitates the clearance of solutes such as amyloid-β from the brain. The researchers demonstrated that extracellular tau in mice is cleared from the brain along the paravascular pathways. After TBI, glymphatic pathway function was reduced by 60%, and this impairment persisted for at least one month after injury. Knockout of the gene encoding the astroglial water channel aquaporin-4 exacerbated glymphatic pathway dysfunction after TBI and promoted the development of neurofibrillary pathology and neurodegeneration in the post-traumatic brain.

In patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA), CT evidence of acute ischemia alone or acute ischemia with chronic ischemia is associated with increased subsequent stroke risk within 90 days, according to a study published online ahead of print December 4 in Stroke. Of 2,028 patients who received CT scans within 24 hours of a TIA, 814 (40.1%) had brain damage resulting from ischemia. In addition, 3.4% of the people in the study group had a subsequent stroke within 90 days, and 25% of patients with CT scans showing three types of damage to their brain had strokes. “These findings should prompt physicians to be more aggressive in managing patients with TIA or nondisabling stroke who are diagnosed with acute ischemia, especially if there is additional chronic ischemia and microangiopathy,” the researchers said.

People who have sleep apnea or spend less time in deep sleep may be more likely to have changes in the brain that are associated with dementia, according to a study published December 10 in Neurology. A total of 167 Japanese–American men had sleep tests in their homes at an average age of 84. All men were followed until they died at an average of six years later. Autopsies were conducted on their brains to look for microinfarcts. Of the 41 men who spent the least sleep time with low blood oxygen levels, four had microinfarcts in the brain. Fourteen of the 42 men with the most sleep time with low blood oxygen levels had the abnormalities; thus, they were nearly four times more likely to develop brain damage.

 

 

Brains affected by autism share a pattern of increased immune responses, according to a data analysis published December 10 in Nature Communications. The researchers examined gene expression in samples from two tissue banks, comparing gene expression in people with autism with that in controls without the condition. Data from 104 brain samples from 72 individuals were analyzed. The investigators focused their analysis on microglial cells. In the brains with autism, the microglial cells appeared to be perpetually activated, and their genes for inflammation responses were activated. The results highlight “the lack of current understanding about how innate immunity controls neural circuits,” stated the study authors. Given the known genetic contributors to autism, inflammation is unlikely to be its root cause, they added.

Compared with placebo, progesterone did not improve outcomes when administered to patients with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI), according to a study published online ahead of print December 10 in the New England Journal of Medicine. Patients were randomly assigned to IV progesterone or placebo, and study treatment was initiated within four hours after injury and administered for 96 hours. The trial was stopped for futility. The researchers found no significant difference between the progesterone group and the placebo group in the proportion of patients with a favorable outcome. Favorable outcomes occurred in 51% of patients who received progesterone and in 56% of those who received placebo. Mortality after six months was 18.8% for participants receiving progesterone and 15.7% for those receiving placebo. Phlebitis was more common in the progesterone group.

Learning-related brain activity in patients with Parkinson’s disease improves as much in response to placebo as to medication, according to a study published in the December issue of Nature Neuroscience. For the study, researchers used functional MRI to scan the brains of 18 patients with Parkinson’s disease as they played a computer game that measures reward learning. In the game, participants discover through trial and error which of two symbols is more likely to lead to a better outcome. Participants played the game when they were not taking medication, when they took medication, and when they took placebo. The researchers found that the dopamine-rich areas of the brain associated with reward learning became equally active when patients took either the real medication or the placebo.

Oral fingolimod may improve outcomes for patients with acute and anterior cerebral circulation occlusion stroke, according to a study published online ahead of print December 8 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The researchers conducted an open-label, evaluator-blinded, parallel-group clinical pilot trial of 22 patients with anterior cerebral circulation occlusion, among whom stroke onset had occurred more than 4.5 hours previously. Participants received standard management alone or standard management plus 0.5 mg of oral fingolimod per day for three consecutive days. Patients receiving fingolimod had lower circulating lymphocyte counts, milder neurologic deficits, and better recovery of neurologic functions. Neurologic rehabilitation was faster among participants who received fingolimod. In addition, enlargement of lesion size was less pronounced between baseline and day seven among patients who received fingolimod.

Migraine headache may double the risk of Bell’s palsy, according to a study published online ahead of print December 17 in Neurology. Two groups of 136,704 people age 18 and older, one group with migraine and one without, were followed for an average of three years. During that time, 671 people in the migraine group and 365 people in the control group were diagnosed with Bell’s palsy. Participants with migraine were twice as likely to develop Bell’s palsy, even after researchers accounted for other factors that could increase the risk of the condition, such as sex, high blood pressure, and diabetes. “Infection, inflammation, or heart and vascular problems could be shared causes for these diseases,” stated the researchers.

Struggling to balance on one leg for 20 seconds or longer is linked to an increased risk for small blood vessel damage in the brain and reduced cognitive function in healthy people with no clinical symptoms, according to a study published online ahead of print December 18 in Stroke. Investigators examined 841 women and 546 men with an average age of 67. To measure one-leg standing time, participants stood with their eyes open and raised one leg. In all, 34.5% of participants with more than two lacunar infarction lesions had trouble balancing, 16% of people with one lacunar infarction lesion had trouble balancing, 30% of participants with more than two microbleed lesions had trouble balancing, and 15.3% of people with one microbleed lesion had trouble balancing.

 

 

Kimberly D. Williams

References

References

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 23(1)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 23(1)
Page Number
4-5
Page Number
4-5
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
New and Noteworthy Information—January 2015
Display Headline
New and Noteworthy Information—January 2015
Legacy Keywords
Kimberly D. Williams, Neurology Reviews, TBI, chronic pain, cognitive decline, migraine
Legacy Keywords
Kimberly D. Williams, Neurology Reviews, TBI, chronic pain, cognitive decline, migraine
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Type of Sickle Cell Disease May Affect Risk of Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/07/2019 - 09:55
Display Headline
Type of Sickle Cell Disease May Affect Risk of Neurodevelopmental Disorders

COLUMBUS, OHIO—Among children with sickle cell disease, type of disease and presence of comorbidities may increase the risk for attentional or behavioral problems, according to research presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Child Neurology Society. Demographics and disease complications also may influence the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders among these children.

“Earlier identification of pediatric patients with sickle cell disease and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), intellectual disability, and specific learning disabilities will allow faster treatment of these disorders and may improve academic performance and quality of life,” said Eboni I. Lance, MD, Co-Medical Director of the Sickle Cell Neurodevelopmental Clinic at Kennedy Krieger Institute in Baltimore.

ADHD Was Common Among Participants
From May 2012 to March 2014, Dr. Lance and colleagues conducted a retrospective chart review of children with sickle cell disease who presented to Kennedy Krieger Institute or Johns Hopkins Hospital. The investigators reviewed the charts for documentation of neurodevelopmental diagnoses such as ADHD; attentional problems; behavioral problems; executive dysfunction; learning disabilities in math, reading, and reading comprehension; intellectual disabilities; developmental delay; fine motor disorders; language disorders; and autism spectrum disorders. The researchers also extracted from the charts data about age, genotype of sickle cell disease, disease complication history, treatments, and school services.

A total of 59 children met inclusion criteria, including 18 who presented to Kennedy Krieger Institute and 41 who presented to Johns Hopkins Hospital. Patients’ average age was 17, and 58% of participants were male. Nearly all (97%) of the children were African American. About 63% of the children had hemoglobin SS type sickle cell disease, 20% had hemoglobin SC, and 10% had hemoglobin S-Beta thalassemia.

When the researchers reviewed participants’ neurodevelopmental diagnoses, they found that 19% of patients had ADHD, 19% had developmental delay, 12% had attention problems, 12% had learning disabilities in math, and 12% had learning disabilities in reading comprehension. Also, 10% of participants had a language disorder, 8% had anxiety, and 8% had behavioral problems.

Associations and Risks for Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Children with hemoglobin S-Beta thalassemia plus or null had significantly higher odds of attention problems than children with the hemoglobin SS type of sickle cell disease. Children with sickle cell disease and a history of asthma had significantly greater odds of behavioral problems than children with sickle cell disease without a history of asthma, even after adjustment for gender and sickle cell disease type. The investigators found no other significant relationships between other neurodevelopmental disorders and demographic characteristics or disease-related complications. They noted that stroke was not associated with significantly increased risk of a specific neurodevelopmental diagnosis, in comparison with other neurodevelopmental disorders.

“There may be differences in the disease phenotype, demographics, and prevalence of certain neurodevelopmental disorders within the pediatric sickle cell disease population,” said Dr. Lance. “Children with sickle cell disease should be screened for neurodevelopmental disorders, with emphasis on specific disease-related characteristics and complications as potential risk factors,” added Dr. Lance. “Specifically, evaluations should include a detailed sickle cell disease history of disease characteristics and complications, as well the typical history of neurologic complications and neurodevelopmental symptoms.”

Erik Greb

References

Suggested Reading
Hensler M, Wolfe K, Lebensburger J, et al. Social skills and executive function among youth with sickle cell disease: a preliminary investigation. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014;39(5):493-500.
Hogan AM, Telfer PT, Kirkham FJ, de Haan M. Precursors of executive function in infants with sickle cell anemia. J Child Neurol. 2013;28(10):1197-1202.

Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 23(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
12-13
Legacy Keywords
Erik Greb, Eboni I. Lance, Neurology Reviews, ADHD, intellectual disability, sickle cell
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Related Articles

COLUMBUS, OHIO—Among children with sickle cell disease, type of disease and presence of comorbidities may increase the risk for attentional or behavioral problems, according to research presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Child Neurology Society. Demographics and disease complications also may influence the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders among these children.

“Earlier identification of pediatric patients with sickle cell disease and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), intellectual disability, and specific learning disabilities will allow faster treatment of these disorders and may improve academic performance and quality of life,” said Eboni I. Lance, MD, Co-Medical Director of the Sickle Cell Neurodevelopmental Clinic at Kennedy Krieger Institute in Baltimore.

ADHD Was Common Among Participants
From May 2012 to March 2014, Dr. Lance and colleagues conducted a retrospective chart review of children with sickle cell disease who presented to Kennedy Krieger Institute or Johns Hopkins Hospital. The investigators reviewed the charts for documentation of neurodevelopmental diagnoses such as ADHD; attentional problems; behavioral problems; executive dysfunction; learning disabilities in math, reading, and reading comprehension; intellectual disabilities; developmental delay; fine motor disorders; language disorders; and autism spectrum disorders. The researchers also extracted from the charts data about age, genotype of sickle cell disease, disease complication history, treatments, and school services.

A total of 59 children met inclusion criteria, including 18 who presented to Kennedy Krieger Institute and 41 who presented to Johns Hopkins Hospital. Patients’ average age was 17, and 58% of participants were male. Nearly all (97%) of the children were African American. About 63% of the children had hemoglobin SS type sickle cell disease, 20% had hemoglobin SC, and 10% had hemoglobin S-Beta thalassemia.

When the researchers reviewed participants’ neurodevelopmental diagnoses, they found that 19% of patients had ADHD, 19% had developmental delay, 12% had attention problems, 12% had learning disabilities in math, and 12% had learning disabilities in reading comprehension. Also, 10% of participants had a language disorder, 8% had anxiety, and 8% had behavioral problems.

Associations and Risks for Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Children with hemoglobin S-Beta thalassemia plus or null had significantly higher odds of attention problems than children with the hemoglobin SS type of sickle cell disease. Children with sickle cell disease and a history of asthma had significantly greater odds of behavioral problems than children with sickle cell disease without a history of asthma, even after adjustment for gender and sickle cell disease type. The investigators found no other significant relationships between other neurodevelopmental disorders and demographic characteristics or disease-related complications. They noted that stroke was not associated with significantly increased risk of a specific neurodevelopmental diagnosis, in comparison with other neurodevelopmental disorders.

“There may be differences in the disease phenotype, demographics, and prevalence of certain neurodevelopmental disorders within the pediatric sickle cell disease population,” said Dr. Lance. “Children with sickle cell disease should be screened for neurodevelopmental disorders, with emphasis on specific disease-related characteristics and complications as potential risk factors,” added Dr. Lance. “Specifically, evaluations should include a detailed sickle cell disease history of disease characteristics and complications, as well the typical history of neurologic complications and neurodevelopmental symptoms.”

Erik Greb

COLUMBUS, OHIO—Among children with sickle cell disease, type of disease and presence of comorbidities may increase the risk for attentional or behavioral problems, according to research presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Child Neurology Society. Demographics and disease complications also may influence the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders among these children.

“Earlier identification of pediatric patients with sickle cell disease and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), intellectual disability, and specific learning disabilities will allow faster treatment of these disorders and may improve academic performance and quality of life,” said Eboni I. Lance, MD, Co-Medical Director of the Sickle Cell Neurodevelopmental Clinic at Kennedy Krieger Institute in Baltimore.

ADHD Was Common Among Participants
From May 2012 to March 2014, Dr. Lance and colleagues conducted a retrospective chart review of children with sickle cell disease who presented to Kennedy Krieger Institute or Johns Hopkins Hospital. The investigators reviewed the charts for documentation of neurodevelopmental diagnoses such as ADHD; attentional problems; behavioral problems; executive dysfunction; learning disabilities in math, reading, and reading comprehension; intellectual disabilities; developmental delay; fine motor disorders; language disorders; and autism spectrum disorders. The researchers also extracted from the charts data about age, genotype of sickle cell disease, disease complication history, treatments, and school services.

A total of 59 children met inclusion criteria, including 18 who presented to Kennedy Krieger Institute and 41 who presented to Johns Hopkins Hospital. Patients’ average age was 17, and 58% of participants were male. Nearly all (97%) of the children were African American. About 63% of the children had hemoglobin SS type sickle cell disease, 20% had hemoglobin SC, and 10% had hemoglobin S-Beta thalassemia.

When the researchers reviewed participants’ neurodevelopmental diagnoses, they found that 19% of patients had ADHD, 19% had developmental delay, 12% had attention problems, 12% had learning disabilities in math, and 12% had learning disabilities in reading comprehension. Also, 10% of participants had a language disorder, 8% had anxiety, and 8% had behavioral problems.

Associations and Risks for Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Children with hemoglobin S-Beta thalassemia plus or null had significantly higher odds of attention problems than children with the hemoglobin SS type of sickle cell disease. Children with sickle cell disease and a history of asthma had significantly greater odds of behavioral problems than children with sickle cell disease without a history of asthma, even after adjustment for gender and sickle cell disease type. The investigators found no other significant relationships between other neurodevelopmental disorders and demographic characteristics or disease-related complications. They noted that stroke was not associated with significantly increased risk of a specific neurodevelopmental diagnosis, in comparison with other neurodevelopmental disorders.

“There may be differences in the disease phenotype, demographics, and prevalence of certain neurodevelopmental disorders within the pediatric sickle cell disease population,” said Dr. Lance. “Children with sickle cell disease should be screened for neurodevelopmental disorders, with emphasis on specific disease-related characteristics and complications as potential risk factors,” added Dr. Lance. “Specifically, evaluations should include a detailed sickle cell disease history of disease characteristics and complications, as well the typical history of neurologic complications and neurodevelopmental symptoms.”

Erik Greb

References

Suggested Reading
Hensler M, Wolfe K, Lebensburger J, et al. Social skills and executive function among youth with sickle cell disease: a preliminary investigation. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014;39(5):493-500.
Hogan AM, Telfer PT, Kirkham FJ, de Haan M. Precursors of executive function in infants with sickle cell anemia. J Child Neurol. 2013;28(10):1197-1202.

References

Suggested Reading
Hensler M, Wolfe K, Lebensburger J, et al. Social skills and executive function among youth with sickle cell disease: a preliminary investigation. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014;39(5):493-500.
Hogan AM, Telfer PT, Kirkham FJ, de Haan M. Precursors of executive function in infants with sickle cell anemia. J Child Neurol. 2013;28(10):1197-1202.

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 23(2)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 23(2)
Page Number
12-13
Page Number
12-13
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Type of Sickle Cell Disease May Affect Risk of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Display Headline
Type of Sickle Cell Disease May Affect Risk of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Legacy Keywords
Erik Greb, Eboni I. Lance, Neurology Reviews, ADHD, intellectual disability, sickle cell
Legacy Keywords
Erik Greb, Eboni I. Lance, Neurology Reviews, ADHD, intellectual disability, sickle cell
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article