Disease activity-guided dose optimization of TNF inhibitors safe and effective in PsA

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 02/07/2023 - 16:44

Key clinical point: Disease activity-guided dose optimization (DAGDO) of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) showed no negative effect on disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Major finding: Compared with the full-dose continuation period, the mean disease activity score in 28-joint count C-reactive protein was not significantly different for DAGDO (0.06; P = .44) and stable dose after DAGDO (0.03; P = .72) periods. Moreover, the rate ratio of infections was not different in DAGDO (0.76; P = .57) and stable dose after DAGDO (0.77; P = .60) periods compared to the full-dose continuation period.

Study details: Findings are from 2 controlled, parallel, retrospective cohorts including 153 patients with PsA and 171 patients with axial spondyloarthritis who were doing well taking TNFi and were eligible for DAGDO.

Disclosures: This study did not report any source of funding. Dr. den Broeder A declared receiving consultancy, honoraria, congress invitations, and research grants from various sources.

Source: Michielsens CAJ et al. Rheumatology. 2021 Oct 2. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab741.

Publications
Topics

Key clinical point: Disease activity-guided dose optimization (DAGDO) of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) showed no negative effect on disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Major finding: Compared with the full-dose continuation period, the mean disease activity score in 28-joint count C-reactive protein was not significantly different for DAGDO (0.06; P = .44) and stable dose after DAGDO (0.03; P = .72) periods. Moreover, the rate ratio of infections was not different in DAGDO (0.76; P = .57) and stable dose after DAGDO (0.77; P = .60) periods compared to the full-dose continuation period.

Study details: Findings are from 2 controlled, parallel, retrospective cohorts including 153 patients with PsA and 171 patients with axial spondyloarthritis who were doing well taking TNFi and were eligible for DAGDO.

Disclosures: This study did not report any source of funding. Dr. den Broeder A declared receiving consultancy, honoraria, congress invitations, and research grants from various sources.

Source: Michielsens CAJ et al. Rheumatology. 2021 Oct 2. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab741.

Key clinical point: Disease activity-guided dose optimization (DAGDO) of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) showed no negative effect on disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Major finding: Compared with the full-dose continuation period, the mean disease activity score in 28-joint count C-reactive protein was not significantly different for DAGDO (0.06; P = .44) and stable dose after DAGDO (0.03; P = .72) periods. Moreover, the rate ratio of infections was not different in DAGDO (0.76; P = .57) and stable dose after DAGDO (0.77; P = .60) periods compared to the full-dose continuation period.

Study details: Findings are from 2 controlled, parallel, retrospective cohorts including 153 patients with PsA and 171 patients with axial spondyloarthritis who were doing well taking TNFi and were eligible for DAGDO.

Disclosures: This study did not report any source of funding. Dr. den Broeder A declared receiving consultancy, honoraria, congress invitations, and research grants from various sources.

Source: Michielsens CAJ et al. Rheumatology. 2021 Oct 2. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab741.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: PsA November 2021
Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:30
Un-Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:30
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:30
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Risk classification at diagnosis predicts post-HCT outcomes in AML

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 10/28/2021 - 08:31

Key clinical point: Risk classification at acute myeloid leukemia (AML) diagnosis predicted clinical outcomes in patients with or without KMT2A-rearranged AML who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in the first complete remission (CR1).

Major finding: Transplanted patients with KMT2A-rearranged and adverse-risk AML had worse overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, and HR 1.45; both P < .001, respectively), leukemia-free survival (HR 1.26; P = .002, and HR 1.47; P < .001, respectively), and relapse (HR 1.27; P = .01, and HR 1.71; P < .001, respectively) vs. patients with intermediate-risk AML.

Study details: This retrospective registry-based study included 3,779 adult patients with KMT2A-rearranged (n = 426), non-KMT2A intermediate-risk (n = 2,384), or non-KMT2A adverse risk (n = 969) AML who underwent HCT in CR1.

 

Disclosures: This study was funded by Weinberg Family and Mortimer J. Lacher fellowships, American Society of Clinical Oncology Young Investigator Award, National Institutes of Health K12 Paul Calabresi Career Development Award for Clinical Oncology, and others. Some investigators reported receiving personal fees, grants, nonfinancial support, research collaboration, owning stocks, or other relations with various sources including pharmaceutical companies not connected with this study.

 

Source: Menghrajani K et al. Blood Adv. 2021 Sep 22. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004881.

Publications
Topics

Key clinical point: Risk classification at acute myeloid leukemia (AML) diagnosis predicted clinical outcomes in patients with or without KMT2A-rearranged AML who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in the first complete remission (CR1).

Major finding: Transplanted patients with KMT2A-rearranged and adverse-risk AML had worse overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, and HR 1.45; both P < .001, respectively), leukemia-free survival (HR 1.26; P = .002, and HR 1.47; P < .001, respectively), and relapse (HR 1.27; P = .01, and HR 1.71; P < .001, respectively) vs. patients with intermediate-risk AML.

Study details: This retrospective registry-based study included 3,779 adult patients with KMT2A-rearranged (n = 426), non-KMT2A intermediate-risk (n = 2,384), or non-KMT2A adverse risk (n = 969) AML who underwent HCT in CR1.

 

Disclosures: This study was funded by Weinberg Family and Mortimer J. Lacher fellowships, American Society of Clinical Oncology Young Investigator Award, National Institutes of Health K12 Paul Calabresi Career Development Award for Clinical Oncology, and others. Some investigators reported receiving personal fees, grants, nonfinancial support, research collaboration, owning stocks, or other relations with various sources including pharmaceutical companies not connected with this study.

 

Source: Menghrajani K et al. Blood Adv. 2021 Sep 22. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004881.

Key clinical point: Risk classification at acute myeloid leukemia (AML) diagnosis predicted clinical outcomes in patients with or without KMT2A-rearranged AML who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in the first complete remission (CR1).

Major finding: Transplanted patients with KMT2A-rearranged and adverse-risk AML had worse overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, and HR 1.45; both P < .001, respectively), leukemia-free survival (HR 1.26; P = .002, and HR 1.47; P < .001, respectively), and relapse (HR 1.27; P = .01, and HR 1.71; P < .001, respectively) vs. patients with intermediate-risk AML.

Study details: This retrospective registry-based study included 3,779 adult patients with KMT2A-rearranged (n = 426), non-KMT2A intermediate-risk (n = 2,384), or non-KMT2A adverse risk (n = 969) AML who underwent HCT in CR1.

 

Disclosures: This study was funded by Weinberg Family and Mortimer J. Lacher fellowships, American Society of Clinical Oncology Young Investigator Award, National Institutes of Health K12 Paul Calabresi Career Development Award for Clinical Oncology, and others. Some investigators reported receiving personal fees, grants, nonfinancial support, research collaboration, owning stocks, or other relations with various sources including pharmaceutical companies not connected with this study.

 

Source: Menghrajani K et al. Blood Adv. 2021 Sep 22. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004881.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: AML November 2021
Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

No worsening of fatigue or health-related quality of life with oral azacitidine maintenance in AML patients in remission

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 10/28/2021 - 08:31

Key clinical point: Maintenance therapy with oral azacitidine (oral-AZA) did not compromise on fatigue and health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) after intensive chemotherapy (IC).

Major finding: Effects of oral-AZA on fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue: difference in overall least square mean change [D] 0.89; 95% CI 2.37- 0.59) and HrQoL (EQ-5D-3L health utility index: D 0.01; 95% CI, 0.03-0.01; EQ-5D visual analog: D 0.95; 95% CI, 4.38-2.47) were comparable to placebo.

Study details: Findings are from the QUAZAR AML-001 trial, including 444 patients with AML with intermediate- or poor-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis and unsuitable for transplantation. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either oral-AZA (n = 225) or placebo (n = 219) in first CR/CRi after IC.

 

Disclosures: This study was funded by Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) Company. Some investigators, including the lead author, reported receiving research/personal support or consulting from, being an employee of, and owning equity in various sources, including Celgene and BMS.

 

Source: Roboz GJ et al. Haematologica. 2021 Sep 23. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.279174.

Publications
Topics

Key clinical point: Maintenance therapy with oral azacitidine (oral-AZA) did not compromise on fatigue and health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) after intensive chemotherapy (IC).

Major finding: Effects of oral-AZA on fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue: difference in overall least square mean change [D] 0.89; 95% CI 2.37- 0.59) and HrQoL (EQ-5D-3L health utility index: D 0.01; 95% CI, 0.03-0.01; EQ-5D visual analog: D 0.95; 95% CI, 4.38-2.47) were comparable to placebo.

Study details: Findings are from the QUAZAR AML-001 trial, including 444 patients with AML with intermediate- or poor-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis and unsuitable for transplantation. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either oral-AZA (n = 225) or placebo (n = 219) in first CR/CRi after IC.

 

Disclosures: This study was funded by Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) Company. Some investigators, including the lead author, reported receiving research/personal support or consulting from, being an employee of, and owning equity in various sources, including Celgene and BMS.

 

Source: Roboz GJ et al. Haematologica. 2021 Sep 23. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.279174.

Key clinical point: Maintenance therapy with oral azacitidine (oral-AZA) did not compromise on fatigue and health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) after intensive chemotherapy (IC).

Major finding: Effects of oral-AZA on fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue: difference in overall least square mean change [D] 0.89; 95% CI 2.37- 0.59) and HrQoL (EQ-5D-3L health utility index: D 0.01; 95% CI, 0.03-0.01; EQ-5D visual analog: D 0.95; 95% CI, 4.38-2.47) were comparable to placebo.

Study details: Findings are from the QUAZAR AML-001 trial, including 444 patients with AML with intermediate- or poor-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis and unsuitable for transplantation. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either oral-AZA (n = 225) or placebo (n = 219) in first CR/CRi after IC.

 

Disclosures: This study was funded by Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) Company. Some investigators, including the lead author, reported receiving research/personal support or consulting from, being an employee of, and owning equity in various sources, including Celgene and BMS.

 

Source: Roboz GJ et al. Haematologica. 2021 Sep 23. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.279174.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: AML November 2021
Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

COVID-19 mortality higher in patients with active AML vs. those in remission

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 10/28/2021 - 08:31

Key clinical point: The source of COVID-19 in most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was presumed to be in-hospital transmission with mortality because COVID-19 was higher in patients with active disease than those in remission.

Major finding: The source of infection was in-hospital transmission in 63% of cases. The overall rate of mortality was 54.5%, with a higher incidence in patients with active AML vs. those in AML remission (83% vs. 17%; P = .0052).

Study details: This retrospective survey evaluated the response of 10 Brazilian hematologists representing 10 cancer centers, providing data on 33 adult patients with either active AML (n = 20) or in AML remission (n = 13) and a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. The patients were admitted to the hospital mainly through urgent or emergency care units.

 

Disclosures: No source of funding was identified. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

 

Source: Fagundes EM et al. Ann Hematol. 2021 Sep 17. doi:  10.1007/s00277-021-04659-w.

Publications
Topics

Key clinical point: The source of COVID-19 in most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was presumed to be in-hospital transmission with mortality because COVID-19 was higher in patients with active disease than those in remission.

Major finding: The source of infection was in-hospital transmission in 63% of cases. The overall rate of mortality was 54.5%, with a higher incidence in patients with active AML vs. those in AML remission (83% vs. 17%; P = .0052).

Study details: This retrospective survey evaluated the response of 10 Brazilian hematologists representing 10 cancer centers, providing data on 33 adult patients with either active AML (n = 20) or in AML remission (n = 13) and a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. The patients were admitted to the hospital mainly through urgent or emergency care units.

 

Disclosures: No source of funding was identified. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

 

Source: Fagundes EM et al. Ann Hematol. 2021 Sep 17. doi:  10.1007/s00277-021-04659-w.

Key clinical point: The source of COVID-19 in most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was presumed to be in-hospital transmission with mortality because COVID-19 was higher in patients with active disease than those in remission.

Major finding: The source of infection was in-hospital transmission in 63% of cases. The overall rate of mortality was 54.5%, with a higher incidence in patients with active AML vs. those in AML remission (83% vs. 17%; P = .0052).

Study details: This retrospective survey evaluated the response of 10 Brazilian hematologists representing 10 cancer centers, providing data on 33 adult patients with either active AML (n = 20) or in AML remission (n = 13) and a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. The patients were admitted to the hospital mainly through urgent or emergency care units.

 

Disclosures: No source of funding was identified. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

 

Source: Fagundes EM et al. Ann Hematol. 2021 Sep 17. doi:  10.1007/s00277-021-04659-w.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: AML November 2021
Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Allo-HSCT in CR1 beneficial for elderly AML patients with unfavorable or intermediate-risk cytogenetics

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 10/28/2021 - 08:31

Key clinical point: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in the first complete remission (CR1) after intensive chemotherapy (IC) offered clinical benefits in elderly patients with intermediate- or unfavorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Major finding: Patients who underwent allo-HSCT vs. those who did not had a significantly lower risk for relapse (hazard ratio [HR] 0.27), longer relapse-free survival (HR 0.47), and overall survival (HR 0.56), but a higher risk for nonrelapse mortality (HR 3.03; all P < .001).

Study details: This retrospective study included 507 elderly patients (age 60-70 years) with AML in CR1 after IC with intermediate or unfavorable risk cytogenetics, of which 203 patients underwent allo-HSCT.

 

Disclosures: No source of funding was identified. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

 

Source: Devillier R et al. Blood Adv. 2021 Sep 15. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004435.

Publications
Topics

Key clinical point: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in the first complete remission (CR1) after intensive chemotherapy (IC) offered clinical benefits in elderly patients with intermediate- or unfavorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Major finding: Patients who underwent allo-HSCT vs. those who did not had a significantly lower risk for relapse (hazard ratio [HR] 0.27), longer relapse-free survival (HR 0.47), and overall survival (HR 0.56), but a higher risk for nonrelapse mortality (HR 3.03; all P < .001).

Study details: This retrospective study included 507 elderly patients (age 60-70 years) with AML in CR1 after IC with intermediate or unfavorable risk cytogenetics, of which 203 patients underwent allo-HSCT.

 

Disclosures: No source of funding was identified. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

 

Source: Devillier R et al. Blood Adv. 2021 Sep 15. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004435.

Key clinical point: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in the first complete remission (CR1) after intensive chemotherapy (IC) offered clinical benefits in elderly patients with intermediate- or unfavorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Major finding: Patients who underwent allo-HSCT vs. those who did not had a significantly lower risk for relapse (hazard ratio [HR] 0.27), longer relapse-free survival (HR 0.47), and overall survival (HR 0.56), but a higher risk for nonrelapse mortality (HR 3.03; all P < .001).

Study details: This retrospective study included 507 elderly patients (age 60-70 years) with AML in CR1 after IC with intermediate or unfavorable risk cytogenetics, of which 203 patients underwent allo-HSCT.

 

Disclosures: No source of funding was identified. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

 

Source: Devillier R et al. Blood Adv. 2021 Sep 15. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004435.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: AML November 2021
Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Varied outcomes in AML patients with NPM-mutant MRD+ at end of IC

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 10/28/2021 - 08:31

Key clinical point: Patients with NPM1-mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with NPM1-mutant measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity (MRD+) at the end of intensive chemotherapy (IC) and not undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in the first remission had variable outcomes.

Major finding: At 12 months, 15% of patients had morphological relapse, 43% had molecular failure, 30% had complete molecular remission, and 12% had European LeukemiaNet-defined molecular persistence with a low copy number (MRD+ in complete remission).

Study details: This study included 100 patients with newly diagnosed NPM1-mutant AML who received at least 2 cycles of IC and had NPM1-mutant MRD+ at the end of IC and who did not plan to undergo HSCT in the first complete remission.

 

Disclosures: No specific source of funding was identified for this study. Some investigators, including the lead author, reported being on a speaker’s bureau and advisory boards for, receiving research funding and royalty payments from, or consulting for various pharmaceutical companies.

 

Source: Tiong IS et al. Blood Adv. 2021 Sep 23. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005455.

Publications
Topics

Key clinical point: Patients with NPM1-mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with NPM1-mutant measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity (MRD+) at the end of intensive chemotherapy (IC) and not undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in the first remission had variable outcomes.

Major finding: At 12 months, 15% of patients had morphological relapse, 43% had molecular failure, 30% had complete molecular remission, and 12% had European LeukemiaNet-defined molecular persistence with a low copy number (MRD+ in complete remission).

Study details: This study included 100 patients with newly diagnosed NPM1-mutant AML who received at least 2 cycles of IC and had NPM1-mutant MRD+ at the end of IC and who did not plan to undergo HSCT in the first complete remission.

 

Disclosures: No specific source of funding was identified for this study. Some investigators, including the lead author, reported being on a speaker’s bureau and advisory boards for, receiving research funding and royalty payments from, or consulting for various pharmaceutical companies.

 

Source: Tiong IS et al. Blood Adv. 2021 Sep 23. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005455.

Key clinical point: Patients with NPM1-mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with NPM1-mutant measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity (MRD+) at the end of intensive chemotherapy (IC) and not undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in the first remission had variable outcomes.

Major finding: At 12 months, 15% of patients had morphological relapse, 43% had molecular failure, 30% had complete molecular remission, and 12% had European LeukemiaNet-defined molecular persistence with a low copy number (MRD+ in complete remission).

Study details: This study included 100 patients with newly diagnosed NPM1-mutant AML who received at least 2 cycles of IC and had NPM1-mutant MRD+ at the end of IC and who did not plan to undergo HSCT in the first complete remission.

 

Disclosures: No specific source of funding was identified for this study. Some investigators, including the lead author, reported being on a speaker’s bureau and advisory boards for, receiving research funding and royalty payments from, or consulting for various pharmaceutical companies.

 

Source: Tiong IS et al. Blood Adv. 2021 Sep 23. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005455.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: AML November 2021
Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

LDAC+venetoclax shows promise as frontline therapy in treatment-naive AML patients unfit for IC

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 10/28/2021 - 08:31

Key clinical point: Combination of low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) with venetoclax vs. placebo improved survival and treatment response in treatment-naive patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (IC).

Major finding: LDAC+venetoclax vs. LDAC+placebo improved median overall survival (hazard ratio 0.70; P = .04), along with higher rates of complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (48.3% vs. 13.2%; P < .001) and postbaseline red blood cell and platelet transfusion independence (39.2% vs. 17.6%; P = .002).

Study details: This was a post hoc analysis performed after an additional 6 months of follow-up of the phase 3 VIALE-C trial, including 211 adult patients with AML who were treatment-naive and unsuitable for IC. Patients were randomly assigned to receive LDAC with venetoclax (n = 143) or placebo (n = 68).

 

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by AbbVie. Some investigators, including the lead author, reported receiving research and financial support from, being on advisory boards or boards of directors for, being a current or former employee of, holding stocks in, or receiving patents and royalties from various pharmaceutical companies, including AbbVie.

 

Source: Wei AH et al. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11:163. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00555-8.

Publications
Topics

Key clinical point: Combination of low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) with venetoclax vs. placebo improved survival and treatment response in treatment-naive patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (IC).

Major finding: LDAC+venetoclax vs. LDAC+placebo improved median overall survival (hazard ratio 0.70; P = .04), along with higher rates of complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (48.3% vs. 13.2%; P < .001) and postbaseline red blood cell and platelet transfusion independence (39.2% vs. 17.6%; P = .002).

Study details: This was a post hoc analysis performed after an additional 6 months of follow-up of the phase 3 VIALE-C trial, including 211 adult patients with AML who were treatment-naive and unsuitable for IC. Patients were randomly assigned to receive LDAC with venetoclax (n = 143) or placebo (n = 68).

 

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by AbbVie. Some investigators, including the lead author, reported receiving research and financial support from, being on advisory boards or boards of directors for, being a current or former employee of, holding stocks in, or receiving patents and royalties from various pharmaceutical companies, including AbbVie.

 

Source: Wei AH et al. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11:163. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00555-8.

Key clinical point: Combination of low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) with venetoclax vs. placebo improved survival and treatment response in treatment-naive patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (IC).

Major finding: LDAC+venetoclax vs. LDAC+placebo improved median overall survival (hazard ratio 0.70; P = .04), along with higher rates of complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (48.3% vs. 13.2%; P < .001) and postbaseline red blood cell and platelet transfusion independence (39.2% vs. 17.6%; P = .002).

Study details: This was a post hoc analysis performed after an additional 6 months of follow-up of the phase 3 VIALE-C trial, including 211 adult patients with AML who were treatment-naive and unsuitable for IC. Patients were randomly assigned to receive LDAC with venetoclax (n = 143) or placebo (n = 68).

 

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by AbbVie. Some investigators, including the lead author, reported receiving research and financial support from, being on advisory boards or boards of directors for, being a current or former employee of, holding stocks in, or receiving patents and royalties from various pharmaceutical companies, including AbbVie.

 

Source: Wei AH et al. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11:163. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00555-8.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: AML November 2021
Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

R/R AML: Mito-FLAG improves response, but allo-HSCT remains essential for prolonged survival

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 10/28/2021 - 08:31

Key clinical point: Salvage chemotherapy with a combination of fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and mitoxantrone (Mito-FLAG) was effective and well-tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is essential for long-term disease-free survival.

Major finding: Overall, 56.1% and 19.7% of patients achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery and partial remission, respectively. The median overall survival (OS), 30-day mortality, and 60-day mortality were 13 (95% CI 10.2-15.8) months, 4.5%, and 7.6%, respectively. The median OS was superior in patients who underwent allo-HSCT (75.8%) vs. those who did not (17 months vs. 3 months; P < .001).

Study details: This retrospective study included 66 patients with R/R AML receiving Mito-FLAG treatment followed up for a median duration of 54 months.

 

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding other than Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

 

Source: Mühleck R et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct 5. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03821-1.

Publications
Topics

Key clinical point: Salvage chemotherapy with a combination of fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and mitoxantrone (Mito-FLAG) was effective and well-tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is essential for long-term disease-free survival.

Major finding: Overall, 56.1% and 19.7% of patients achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery and partial remission, respectively. The median overall survival (OS), 30-day mortality, and 60-day mortality were 13 (95% CI 10.2-15.8) months, 4.5%, and 7.6%, respectively. The median OS was superior in patients who underwent allo-HSCT (75.8%) vs. those who did not (17 months vs. 3 months; P < .001).

Study details: This retrospective study included 66 patients with R/R AML receiving Mito-FLAG treatment followed up for a median duration of 54 months.

 

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding other than Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

 

Source: Mühleck R et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct 5. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03821-1.

Key clinical point: Salvage chemotherapy with a combination of fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and mitoxantrone (Mito-FLAG) was effective and well-tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is essential for long-term disease-free survival.

Major finding: Overall, 56.1% and 19.7% of patients achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery and partial remission, respectively. The median overall survival (OS), 30-day mortality, and 60-day mortality were 13 (95% CI 10.2-15.8) months, 4.5%, and 7.6%, respectively. The median OS was superior in patients who underwent allo-HSCT (75.8%) vs. those who did not (17 months vs. 3 months; P < .001).

Study details: This retrospective study included 66 patients with R/R AML receiving Mito-FLAG treatment followed up for a median duration of 54 months.

 

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding other than Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

 

Source: Mühleck R et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct 5. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03821-1.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: AML November 2021
Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Intensification of induction II does not improve outcomes in pediatric high-risk AML

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 10/28/2021 - 08:31

Key clinical point: Intensification of induction II chemotherapy with mitoxantrone and high-dose cytarabine (MA) did not improve survival, but increased toxicity in pediatric patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) vs. cytarabine/daunorubicin/etoposide (ADE).

Major finding: Induction II with MA vs. ADE did not improve 5-year disease-free survival (P = .632) and overall survival (P = .658). Fewer patients receiving MA vs. ADE achieved neutrophil (52.6% vs. 79.3%; P = .011) and platelet (60.0% vs. 82.8%; P = .024) recovery.

Study details: This study included 124 patients with newly diagnosed de novo high-risk AML treated in AAML0531 (n = 29) and AAML1031 (n = 95) trials. For induction II, patients in AAML0531 received ADE and those in AAML1031 received MA. Also, stem cell transplant conditioning used busulfan/cyclophosphamide in AAML0531 and busulfan/fludarabine along with liberalized donor eligibility in AAML1031 trials.

 

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from the COG NCTN Network Group Operations Centres and NCTN Statistics and Data Center. M Loken and LE Brodersen reported being an employee of Hematologics Inc.

 

Source: Elgarten CW et al. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Oct 1. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29281.

Publications
Topics

Key clinical point: Intensification of induction II chemotherapy with mitoxantrone and high-dose cytarabine (MA) did not improve survival, but increased toxicity in pediatric patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) vs. cytarabine/daunorubicin/etoposide (ADE).

Major finding: Induction II with MA vs. ADE did not improve 5-year disease-free survival (P = .632) and overall survival (P = .658). Fewer patients receiving MA vs. ADE achieved neutrophil (52.6% vs. 79.3%; P = .011) and platelet (60.0% vs. 82.8%; P = .024) recovery.

Study details: This study included 124 patients with newly diagnosed de novo high-risk AML treated in AAML0531 (n = 29) and AAML1031 (n = 95) trials. For induction II, patients in AAML0531 received ADE and those in AAML1031 received MA. Also, stem cell transplant conditioning used busulfan/cyclophosphamide in AAML0531 and busulfan/fludarabine along with liberalized donor eligibility in AAML1031 trials.

 

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from the COG NCTN Network Group Operations Centres and NCTN Statistics and Data Center. M Loken and LE Brodersen reported being an employee of Hematologics Inc.

 

Source: Elgarten CW et al. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Oct 1. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29281.

Key clinical point: Intensification of induction II chemotherapy with mitoxantrone and high-dose cytarabine (MA) did not improve survival, but increased toxicity in pediatric patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) vs. cytarabine/daunorubicin/etoposide (ADE).

Major finding: Induction II with MA vs. ADE did not improve 5-year disease-free survival (P = .632) and overall survival (P = .658). Fewer patients receiving MA vs. ADE achieved neutrophil (52.6% vs. 79.3%; P = .011) and platelet (60.0% vs. 82.8%; P = .024) recovery.

Study details: This study included 124 patients with newly diagnosed de novo high-risk AML treated in AAML0531 (n = 29) and AAML1031 (n = 95) trials. For induction II, patients in AAML0531 received ADE and those in AAML1031 received MA. Also, stem cell transplant conditioning used busulfan/cyclophosphamide in AAML0531 and busulfan/fludarabine along with liberalized donor eligibility in AAML1031 trials.

 

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from the COG NCTN Network Group Operations Centres and NCTN Statistics and Data Center. M Loken and LE Brodersen reported being an employee of Hematologics Inc.

 

Source: Elgarten CW et al. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Oct 1. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29281.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: AML November 2021
Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Addition of quizartinib to LDAC improves outcomes in older patients with FLT3-ITD-mutated AML

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 10/28/2021 - 08:31

Key clinical point: Addition of quizartinib to low-dose ara-C (LDAC) vs. LDAC alone improved survival and response in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy (IC).

Major finding: Among patients with FLT3-ITD mutation, LDAC+quizartinib improved response in 38% of patients vs. 0% of patients receiving LDAC alone (P = .02). The 2-year overall survival also improved significantly in patients receiving LDAC+quizartinib (hazard ratio 0.36; P = .024).

Study details: This study included 202 older patients with AML (de novo AML 63%; secondary AML 25%; high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome 11%) unsuitable for IC with (n = 27) or without FLT3-ITD mutation randomly assigned to receive LDAC+quizartinib or LDAC alone.

 

Disclosures: This study was supported by UK National Institute for Health Research, Blood Cancer UK, and Daiichi Sankyo. Some investigators reported being on advisory boards for, receiving research funding and honoraria from, or being an employee of various pharmaceutical companies, including Daiichi Sankyo.

 

Source: Dennis M et al. Blood Adv. 2021 Oct 1. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005038.

Publications
Topics

Key clinical point: Addition of quizartinib to low-dose ara-C (LDAC) vs. LDAC alone improved survival and response in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy (IC).

Major finding: Among patients with FLT3-ITD mutation, LDAC+quizartinib improved response in 38% of patients vs. 0% of patients receiving LDAC alone (P = .02). The 2-year overall survival also improved significantly in patients receiving LDAC+quizartinib (hazard ratio 0.36; P = .024).

Study details: This study included 202 older patients with AML (de novo AML 63%; secondary AML 25%; high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome 11%) unsuitable for IC with (n = 27) or without FLT3-ITD mutation randomly assigned to receive LDAC+quizartinib or LDAC alone.

 

Disclosures: This study was supported by UK National Institute for Health Research, Blood Cancer UK, and Daiichi Sankyo. Some investigators reported being on advisory boards for, receiving research funding and honoraria from, or being an employee of various pharmaceutical companies, including Daiichi Sankyo.

 

Source: Dennis M et al. Blood Adv. 2021 Oct 1. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005038.

Key clinical point: Addition of quizartinib to low-dose ara-C (LDAC) vs. LDAC alone improved survival and response in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy (IC).

Major finding: Among patients with FLT3-ITD mutation, LDAC+quizartinib improved response in 38% of patients vs. 0% of patients receiving LDAC alone (P = .02). The 2-year overall survival also improved significantly in patients receiving LDAC+quizartinib (hazard ratio 0.36; P = .024).

Study details: This study included 202 older patients with AML (de novo AML 63%; secondary AML 25%; high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome 11%) unsuitable for IC with (n = 27) or without FLT3-ITD mutation randomly assigned to receive LDAC+quizartinib or LDAC alone.

 

Disclosures: This study was supported by UK National Institute for Health Research, Blood Cancer UK, and Daiichi Sankyo. Some investigators reported being on advisory boards for, receiving research funding and honoraria from, or being an employee of various pharmaceutical companies, including Daiichi Sankyo.

 

Source: Dennis M et al. Blood Adv. 2021 Oct 1. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005038.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: AML November 2021
Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article